20160980 Ver 2_As Built Report_20191029

ID#* 20160980
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 10/29/2019
Mitigation Project Submittal - 10/29/2019
Version* 2
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?*
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands lF Buffer fJ Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jamey McEachran
Project Information
..................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20160980
Existing IDY
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Meadow Spring
County: Johnston
Document Information
r Yes r No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:*2
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Meadow Spring Bank Parcel As Built Report.pdf 4.61MB
Rease upload only one RDF of the conplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Ryan Medric
Signature:*

Bank Parcel Development Plan As -Built Report
Meadow Spring Mitigation Site
DWR Project # 2016-0980v2
Johnston County, North Carolina
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Prepared By:
fires
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
919-829-9909
Bank Sponsor: EBX-Neuse I, LLC
October 2019

Table of Contents
1 Project Summary................................................................
1.1 Project Location and Description ..........................
1.2 Project Success Criteria .........................................
1.3 Project Components ..............................................
1.4 Riparian Restoration and Enhancement Approach
1.5 Construction and As -Built Conditions ..................
1.6 Baseline Monitoring Performance .........................
2 Methods..............................................................................
3 Reference............................................................................
Appendix A: Site Mans
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3: As -Built Plat
Figure 4: Erosion and Sediment Control Plans
Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2: Plant Species Summary
Table 3: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 4: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Appendix C: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets
1
1
1
2
3
4
4
4
5

I Proiect Summary
L I Project Location and Description
EBX—Neuse I, LLC (EBX), an entity of Resource Environmental Solutions (RES), is pleased to provide
this Monitoring Report for the Meadow Spring Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Bank (Parcel).
This Parcel was designed to provide riparian buffer mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due to
development within the Neuse River Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 8-digit Hydrologic
Unit Code (HUC — 03020201). In addition, it provides nutrient offset credits in the 03020201 HUC,
excluding the Falls Lake Watershed, for existing and proposed development requiring such mitigation. This
BPDP is in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295, 15A NCAC
02B .0240 and the RES Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument for Riparian Buffer Mitigation and
Nutrient Offset Credits (UMBI), made and entered into by EBX-Neuse I, LLC acting as the Bank Sponsor
(Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality -Division of Water Resources
(DWR). Supporting figures can be found in Appendix A. The BPDP was also designed in concurrence
with Meadow Spring Stream Mitigation Site in the Neu -Con Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation
Bank (SAW# 2016-01989). The mitigation plan for the Meadow Spring Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank
was approved by the Interagency Review Team (IRT) and constructed in May 2019.
The Meadow Spring Parcel is located in Johnston County approximately three miles north of Smithfield,
North Carolina (Figure 1). The Parcel is located within Neuse River Basin USGS 14-digit HUC
03020201100050, a Targeted Local Watershed, and DWR Subbasin Number 03-04-02. To access the Site
head East on NC 70 from the Town of Wilson Mills and turn right onto Wilson Mills Road and head south
for approximately 1.5 miles. The coordinates of the site are 35.5437°N and - 78.3303°W.
When combining the Meadow Spring Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank with the Meadow Spring
Riparian Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Bank, the conservation easement totals approximately 60.93
acres and includes three unnamed tributaries to the Neuse River. The Parcel is located in an area dominated
by agricultural fields, cattle pastures and wooded areas. The majority of the Parcel was grazed pasture and
disturbed riparian forest. Additional land use practices included the maintenance and removal of riparian
vegetation and the relocation, dredging and straightening of onsite streams that resulted in degraded water
quality and unstable channel characteristics. The Parcel also contained an agricultural pond that was in
place for over 40 years.
The Meadow Spring Stream Mitigation Site was built to provide stream enhancement and restoration on
approximately 7,392 linear feet of streams and wetland restoration and enhancement on approximately
36.51 acres of wetlands, to generate 14.41 wetland mitigation units, within the conservation easement
through a separate mitigation banking instrument with the IRT. The Meadow Spring Bank Parcel was
built to restore and enhance stream systems with their adjacent riparian buffers and their functions and
values to compensate, in appropriate circumstances, for unavoidable riparian buffer impacts and nutrient
load reduction requirements. DWR staff performed an onsite viability assessment for buffer mitigation
and nutrient offset on October 18, 2016 and approved the BPDP in May 2018.
1.2 Project Success Criteria
Annual vegetation monitoring will occur each year for a minimum of five (5) years and will be conducted
during the fall season with the first year occurring at least five months from initial planting. Six vegetation
monitoring plots were installed a minimum of 100 m2 in size and cover at least two percent of the riparian
restoration area. Plots were randomly placed throughout the planted Neuse buffer zones and nutrient offset
mitigation area and are representative of the crediting areas. The following data will be recorded for all
Meadow Spring 1 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2019

trees in the plots: species, common name, height, planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. All stems
in plots will be flagged with flagging tape. Photos are to be taken from all photo points each monitoring
year and provided in the annual reports. Visual inspections and photos will be taken to ensure that
preservation and enhancement areas are being maintained and compliant. The measures of vegetative
success for the Parcel will be the survival of at least 4 native hardwood tree species, where no one species
is greater than 50 percent of the established stems, established at a density of at least 260 planted trees per
acre at the end of Year 5. Native volunteer species may be included to meet the performance standards upon
DWR approval. Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and treated so that none become dominant
or alter the desired community structure of the site.
A visual assessment of the cattle exclusion areas within the conservation easement will also be performed
each year to confirm:
• Fencing is in good condition throughout the site;
• no cattle access within the conservation easement area;
• no encroachment has occurred;
• diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservation easement area; and
• there has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would
negatively affect the functioning of the buffer.
RES must monitor the stream mitigation bank for a minimum of seven years, or until IRT approval.
Therefore, plots placed within riparian restoration areas that are outside of the mitigation area for buffer
and nutrient offset credits will be monitored in accordance with the monitoring protocol in the Meadow
Spring Stream Mitigation Plan.
1.3 Project Components
This Bank generates approximately 4.42 acres (192,368 ftZ) of riparian buffer restoration credits on existing
non -forested pasture, 1.79 acres (26,805 fC) of buffer enhancement credits via cattle exclusion, and 1.88
acres (4,271 lbs) of nitrogen nutrient offset credits. The slight increase in credits is due to a more accurate
treeline survey being used to determine as -built areas. The riparian buffer mitigation credits generated
service Neuse buffer impacts within the USGS 8-digit HUC 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin. The
Nitrogen nutrient offsets generated service nutrient load reduction requirements where payments are
authorized in 15A NCAC 02B .0240 within the USGS 8-digit HUC 03020201, excluding the Falls Lake
Watershed. The Sponsor maintains three credit ledgers. One ledger accounts for buffer Restoration credits,
one ledger accounts for buffer Enhancement credits, and one accounts for Nitrogen nutrient offset credits.
All mitigation credit assets shall be shown on these credit ledgers. The total potential mitigation credits that
the Meadow Spring Bank generates are summarized in the table below.
Meadow Spring 2 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2019

Riparian Buffer Credit
Riparian
Credit
Existing
Credit Per
% Full
Zone
Type
Mitigation Type
Acreage
Acre $
Ratio
Credit
Mitigation Assets
Riparian
Restoration
1.87
43,560
1:1
100%
81,474 ft� (L87 ac)
Buffer
0-50'
Riparian
Enhancement via Cattle
0.69
43,560
2:1
100%
15,002 ftz (0.34 ac)
Buffer
Exclusion
Riparian
Restoration
2.55
43,560
Ll
100%
110,894 W (2.55 ac)
Buffer
51-100'
Riparian
Enhancement via Cattle
0.27
43,560
2:1
100%
5,775 ftz (0.13 ac)
Buffer
Exclusion
Riparian
Enhancement via Cattle
101-20Y
0.84
43,560
2:1
33%
6,029 ftz (0.14 ac)
Buffer
Exclusion
Total Restoration
4.42
192,368 ftz (4.42 ac)
Total Enhancements
1.79
26,805 $' (0.62 ac)
includes ratios & reductions
Nutrient Offset Credit
Credit
Credit Per
Zone
Mitigation Type
Acreage
Ratio
Mitigation Assets (Ibs)
T e
Acre lbs
101-200'
Nitrogen
Restoration
1.88
2,273.02
N/A
4,2711bs (1.88 ac)
TOTAL
1.88
4,271lbs (1.88 ac)
The Sponsor may use the 4.42 acres (192,368 ftz) of riparian restoration generated on the non -forested
pasture for either Neuse riparian buffer credits or Nitrogen nutrient offset credits, but not both. The
Sponsor must submit a written request and receive written approval from DWR prior to any credit
conversions and transfers to the buffer and nutrient offset credit ledgers. With each conversion and
transfer request submitted to the DWR, the Sponsor will provide all updated credit ledgers showing all
transactions that have occurred up to the date of the request.
1.4 Riparian Restoration and Enhancement Approach
The land uses adjacent to the streams purposed for buffer restoration and enhancement were primarily
composed of forested and non -forested pasture which were grazed by livestock, but also included, row -
crops, maintained lawns, and hardwood forests.
Restoration activities based on the design approach included meandering the channel within the natural
valley, backfilling the existing stream, reconnecting the channel to its floodplain, removing the existing
dam embankment (the pond) and restoring hydrology to historically drained wetlands. Diffuse flow is
maintained throughout the mitigated riparian areas.
Enhancement also occurs in areas of grazing adjacent to the stream in accordance with the Consolidated
Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6). RES installed cattle exclusion fencing in all riparian
areas where enhancement credit under this part of the rule is being requested to exclude access to riparian
areas and their associated streams. All fencing was installed to NRCS specifications.
All riparian restoration areas were planted from top of bank back at least 50 feet from the stream with bare
root tree seedlings on an eight by eight foot spacing to achieve an initial density of 680 trees per acre. Bank
planting and stabilization also incorporates the use of a riparian seed mix and temporary ground cover to
prevent erosion after construction. The buffered channels provide water quality and habitat functions within
the sensitive Neuse River watershed, such as nutrient and sediment removal, filtration of runoff, and
improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat. Some areas adjacent to the forested areas may require maintenance
Meadow Spring 3 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2019

due to the rapid regeneration of some species, such as red maple (Acer rubrum) and sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua).
1.5 Construction and As Built Conditions
Revegetation of the Site included treating invasive species and planting native hardwood bare root trees.
Prior to planting, RES prepped the site by spraying and ripping the easement. Coastal Plain Small Stream
Swamp is the target community type and was used for all areas within the project. The community is defined
by Schafale (2012). The planting of bare root trees occurred in May and June 2019. Deviations from the
initial planting plan were due to bare root availability. A list of the planted species can be found in Table
2.
Stream construction activities were completed in June 2019. The site was constructed in accordance with
the Approved Mitigation Plan and associated permits. RES acquired 404 (SAW-2016-01989), 401 (DWR
# 16-0980), and NPDES Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (JC#18-097-P; Figure 4) Permits. There were
no easement changes between the submittal of the BPDP Approval and the construction of the site. The
conservation easement is marked every 150-200 feet with North Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation signs
attached to either fences or t-posts. Fences were installed in areas where livestock were present, and t-posts
are used as physical barriers where livestock are not present.
1.6 Baseline Monitoring Performance
The Meadow Spring Baseline Monitoring activities were completed in June 2019. All Baseline Monitoring
data is present below and in the appendices. The Site is on track to meeting vegetation and stream interim
success criteria.
Monitoring of the six permanent vegetation plots was completed during June 2019. Vegetation tables and
transect data are in Appendix B and associated photos are in Appendix C. MYO monitoring data indicates
that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities
ranged from 769 to 1,416 planted stems per acre with a mean of 1,160 planted stems per acre across all
plots. A total of 19 species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species were not noted at baseline
monitoring but are expected to establish in upcoming years. The average tree height observed was 1.7 feet.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the project.
2 Methods
Vegetation success is being monitored at six permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation plot monitoring
follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes
analysis of species composition and density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry
tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal
conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the origin each monitoring year.
Meadow Spring 4 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2019

3 Reference
EBX — Neuse I, LLC (2018). Meadow Spring Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site — Bank Parcel Development Plan.
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
NCDENR. 2009. "Meuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan." Division of Water Quality. http://
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpu/basin/neuse/2009. (October 2013).
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 - Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Meadow Spring 5 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2019

Appendix A
Site Maps

1913 r.
Company Wrench P
Double Barley Brewing
9
0
D.0-T. State Yard P
® Maintenance Engineer
North Carolina ©h
Dot -Equip
a'
1�m'd
aW W
Johnston Correctional
Institution
Legend
Conservation Easement
10
Pi Concrete 9
Services, Inc
Handy Andy Carpets 9 cq°
Marathon 9
S T Wooten Corporaunn
4
The Light of Christ
��,, International outreach...
Q e, Q Landwood Church 9
`� °'A gultalo Rd
Court Nursing
Illation Center
0 4
a e��
4
N L M�3Ne br
field Senior Manor
s�
Ressurection Hill Church
HP
rwvod s! Maa><nr
CA�lenson wy [7
a""eensr`ptensu SmithN" Neuse Charter School
Pented First
PentecostalQ a �E StateEmployees © 9 P
n Houses 2 '�,. Credd Un on
p see M �urwo°d5r°v Kids Care Pediatrics
p�Fnsbn Hwy ns
4 c v Smdhfield•Selma
d 5ja��sr s Smithfield Recreatron
Aquatics Center High School
Pxos, Smithfield
Smithfield Middle School 9 Community
a Park
c
a�
S M I T H F I E L D
er¢rsr WMPM 9 14n
OfridOr 9 •• �ppa prd'LT
6
® Walmart Supwcentar
McDonald's © 'm s~ �a,l°v ^� Belk 9
i
Lion {� y t;
d I
N
Date: 10/25/2019
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
w e Drawn by: RTM res
Meadow Spring Buffer/Nutrient Site
n S Checked by: BPB
0 1,000 21000
Johnston County, North Carolina
1 inch = 2,000 feet
Feet

r NiVrFs
+ cErrMMA EA:1DR a asrnreen
P. Af2 AtSTnm ARE of C ri//ONW ]fFASNoli4-A�rS AY
w W PIET- E f1faEGK L/4F95 -r+ - sF horn.
a w uUTP y NI w »as semrr-
A AU /yRlRlae Cr t✓ 51.w+Er 4 to AN7/' rIC afarlF ZOfaS
■CE
7. IN[aMaRp
E6,w7L.K5 W,r AW
EAISIS-ru4vn A&qn»
.eraN•WlOaParEdaAr
Ammo pAaHa;/T u, •r
COMM A[aaafrr
'
I I I
I i
I
I
I I
� I I
srFrwrxx �ro r� � a �wenmrsMw
Par P, Pc fE7
�
EASEMENT LINE
TABLE
LINE i
64'NECT7Q10'
CYSrANCf
ral!
1� _�
L+
a ]T OW, F
r]p+Y
r/r7
P!E
��
L]
s M.VT]- E
r -M,
}
Imm-
`
-
Is
M -11d .' E
-n,
1
7a',f/'fa• •v-
1
WC1NITr MAP
_
(nn- m scfw
11
`_
w fmz N m
Pt: -,I
_ SO' OffSFr
_ _ Nk]0/r f/Rf /AMer [/nTLO Aa4rftFveP
L'B fNl, PC Yia
so' OFFSET
_
' w, OfF T
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT Poo' "
AREA f - ',
-'_ +G17' V05E1'
sa• u rser
srFr*F>.�sa+ +//T e/arro owrnrAsmw
PIP 17-v. Ac a+
Pa 2 PG 57
''
♦
jl
a
'
1 r00' OI"f'ffT
so' u'-rSEr �� •�^
E
4�—
a7•
aage' E I ■
M Ty + • ,I .
,+
.t�• +
+++*+ + .
k /r` w D-F5ET . .
+ �. .
+ �4
------- -----� 1 . _ .
Pa r,m+/T
arew.
047
--- �- --J }�
+rmo
MINT W MY
WYwhm
n
-------'-' ApgM/q n urt
HAr 1vcFFaow'r
maw w[
•� �. cQ%vm w � iFEJ-Ka wr 9.w1Em
Pc AkM 17r
a .oloo"v+trt
- Et"m 4cmw0r W-w)
�. a4FrF1v aEswalraw (sr'-rro)
FR4Fle%uT WA
D ufK"0rtr+1 w-m
!81' caslr+ea)
_ arrre>o auxarorr (]+=rEv7
AT£A 1(A At A'i f]f) • 7p Q]T MS
®. fk>tFFa FMHINCLWIf (rol'-70f17
MInP.EPIr W73EY (10+-PL177
©- K7AYP W401O.
. roo c�7'sFr " ar=7 v 11
srePhxrrsw r�r raarro rrerNens.w -v. - tm' nl7SET
% 2, rC 6T �
�• { 1
Ilk +
r40' OFFSET ..•�— - - - ' a �
RIPARIAN BUFFER CREDIT
RIPARIAN ZONE
MITIGATION TYPE
AREA(SQ. Fr.)
AREA(ACRES)
0.50'
RESTORATION
91,474
1,07
ENHANCEMENT
30,003
0,69
51'-100"
RESTORATION
110,B94
2.55
ENHANCEMENT
11,550
0,27
101'-200'
JENHANCEMENT
36,538
0.64
TOTAL RESTORATION
192,3 88
4-42
TOTAL FNM MCFMfNT
7B.B91
r 79
NUTRIENT OFFSET CREDIT
ZONE
CREDIT TYPE
MITIGATION)
TYPE
AREA{SM FT.}
AREAIACRESI
101-200'
NITROGEN
RESTORATION
$1,944
1,88
TOTAL NITROGEN OFFSETS
81,844
1-m
Ipa o 30 1a0 NO Wp
Usear 3
1 i. Ip0 IL
11`��i�li4lplf Il1f1111
<H Cw]LOrIGd
Y 7 -
auL r -
sl
V 4 Lr1fY � S
yl �f �IElY14Lp �``
WEI M
1 0: 1
W
!AR
'w ■
I
z
_0
z
■
2
x
p
H
z
2
N6
N6 W
m
z
z
z
0
0
z
W
_
W
0
0
cc
a
�
W
0
H
W
cc
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
906 N. QUEEN ST., SUITE
KINSTON, NC 28501
A
TEL: [phone]
FAX.' 252-522-4747
FIRM LIC. # P-0227
EMAIL: surveyor0matmeeast.net
JRW -
9%27/2019
vuitct to
20160051
p1A11p6 x
MEADOW SPRINGS 6VFFER-0WG

W.Lv W 3TEPI1EaSON
pe— Paa7
A
� � 1---- - LEGEND
I-
EXISTING TREELINE
` LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LOD
I
( PROPOSEQ CONSERVATION EASEMENT - :ce
I SILT FENCE? WATTLE ■ ■ ■
`I1 I STAGING+STOCKPILE AREA
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
III HAUL ROUTE
(III A TEMPORARY STREAM CR6531N6
PROPOSED PUMP AROUND LOCATION 4W--1--1r--10--00
y�y I
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG.
{SEE DETAIL QYYG R2}
o
TOTAL AREA OF 615Tt1RB/WCE= 39 ACRES
TOTAL AREA OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT: 61 ACRES
wlLaw rwn rmn, urea
PnRTr+Ene,w C6 , NT- Pc:oa
xra lw.9TFPNEt of
srEPxexscr ear ur�rrEowanu:as�iP oe +ou. Pc aia oe me.Pc aos Pa
� iT]2 PG ,5, �2 P6 s13
P62 vC,E�
CA
EXISTI NG CHANN EL TO BE FILLED f
(IMPACT PERMITTED SEE APPENDIX D I• r ' �k_
OF EROSION CONTROL PACKAGE( k J■
EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE FILLED
(IMPACT PERMITTED SEE APPENDIX D '• �-f %
OF EROSION CONTROL PACKAGE]
X�x�
EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE FILLED
(IMPACT PERMITTED SEE APPENDIX O
OF EROSION CONTROL PACKAGE(
:d'.� eoo ee 000a l'A
PERMITBOX
vQ''� oeee
LQO01
I ��
{� 0
map a qo
30 0 'e"9
1 ao°000ao°o !
i o �oeocoaen"a _
oo
EXISTING DRNEWAY(APPROX.)
rnl::ym
• ! G BI;
E E '•
STfP.4f+SON ,DOT Il•NTED PMINEPSHIv pa
1'+]Y Pp rsr
oa 2 PG ,m
EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE FILLED
(IMPACT PERMITTED SEE
APPENDIX D OF EROSION
CONTROL PACKAGE)
IN HATCHED AREA AS GRADING OCCURS AROUND PILLED
CHANNEL AND BREACHED PONO, CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE
THAT EROSION CONTROL WATTLES ARE INSTALLED BETWEEN
AREAS OF GRADING AND CHANNEL RECEIVING RUNOFF. WORK
SHALL PROCEED FROM UPSTREAM TOWARD DOWNSTREAM.
AND WATTLE LOCATION MAY BE ADJUSTED AS WORK
PROGRESSES.
EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE FILLED
(IMPACT PERMITTED SEE APPENOM O
OF EROSION CONTROL PACKAGE)
�e�ilri►gin..
PROPOSED RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
(SEE DETAIL? DWG 061
I
WDI&SON
wp.px►�ry Inra:mxlure a,r+wnand
Ttanspwallon t Water Resources
UrIm Dwwoprrnnt . GoonwM
7W Corporate DrNa
Raleigh, NC 27W7r
(rj 81&7820995
{q 919.782.W72
wwyr.wktliclaon.pom
��µla+el,rlry�,
SEAL
'�$ • S
rl1
FULL SCALE: I' -I W
0 100 2W
r - HALF FULL SCALE
SCALE'
sWs
� W
z
7
z
z
LU
U ❑
z
x%
Qo
O
LL J
oQ $
I' M
FC
z
0 = o:=
Z
�: ova
z Q N III-
to 2 � V �
8
w❑2 �
z$op�p
PRGJ- DATE: 901AR. 2019
O.C.: �TLM
O.C. DAATE rFEB. 2019
DRAWING NUMBER: •.
E S Cl 1 1
PROD. ND.:
20160215.00.RA
M.

Appendix B
Vegetation Assessment Data

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2. Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Scientific Name
Total Stems Planted
Water Oak
Quercus nigra
3,500
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus michauxii
2,700
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
2,300
Baldcypress
Taxodium distichum
21000
Green Ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2,000
Overcup Oak
Quercus lyrata
2,000
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
2,000
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
2,000
Swamp Tupelo
Nyssa bi ora
2,000
Water Tupelo
Nyssa aquatica
1,700
Yellow Poplar
Liriodendron tuli i era
1,600
Crab Apple
Malus angustifolia
800
S Dogwood
Cornus amomum
800
Flowering Dogwood
Cornus florida
800
Buttonbush
Cephalanthus occidentalis
700
Blackgum
Nyssa sylvatica
600
American Plum
Prunus americana
500
American Hazelnut
Corylus americana
400
River Birch
Betula nigra
400
Elderberry
Sambucus nigra
100
Total
28,900
Table 3. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Plante d
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Stem
Height (ft)
1
1255
0
1255
Yes
1.8
2
1093
0
1093
Yes
1.6
3
769
0
769
Yes
1.6
8
1012
0
1012
Yes
1.6
9
1416
0
1416
Yes
1.8
11
1416
0
1416
Yes
1.6
Project Avg
1160
0
1160
Yes
1.7

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 4. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Meadow Spring
Current Plot Data (MYO 2019)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
06122019-01-0001
06122019-01-0002
06122019-01-0003
06122019-01-0008
06122019-01-0009
06122019-01-0011
MYO (2019)
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
8
8
8
4
4
4
1
1
1
13
13
13
Cephalanthus occidentali
common buttonbush
Shrub
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
2
2
2
2
2
2
Cornus florida
flowering dogwood
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
Corylus americana
American hazelnut
Shrub
3
3
3
3
3
3
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
81
8
8
4
4
4
12
12
12
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
5
5
5
Malus angustifolia
southern crabapple
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Nyssa aquatica
watertupelo
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
4
4
4
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
6
6
6
3
3
3
2
2
2
10
10
10
24
24
24
Prunus americana
American plum
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus
oak
Tree
4
4
4
17
17
17
6
6
6
10
10
10
14
14
14
3
3
3
54
54
54
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
8
8
8
14
14
14
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
2
2
2
7
7
7
Quercus nigra
wateroak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
11
11
11
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
ITree
5
5
5
1
1
1
4
4
4
10
10
10
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
31
311
31
27
27
27
191
191
19
251
25
25
35
35
35
351
351
35
172
172
172
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.15
8
L12551
8
6
6
6
9
9
9
6
6
6
7
7
7
12
12
12
20
20
20
12551255
1093
1093
1093
769
769
769
1012
1012
1012
1416
1416
1416
1416
14161
1416
11601
11601
1160

Appendix C
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Meadow Spring MYO Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1
Vegetation Plot 3
Vegetation Plot 9
Vegetation Plot 2
Vegetation Plot 8
Vegetation Plot 11

Appendix D
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets

Plot (continued): 06122019-01-0001 Jun 2019 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 06122019-01-0001 arty: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): Date: / / New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.550308 Datum: NAD27
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:-78.34365 UTM Zone:�200
N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg):
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID
species Naine
Map
char
Source*
X Y
0.1m 0.1m
Jun 2019 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
1
Betula nigra
R
0.3
0.3
58.0
2
Betula nigra
R
1.7
0.4
49.0
3
Quercus phellos
O
R
3.1
0.6
50.0
4
Quercus sp.
O
R
4.4
0.8
72.0
5
Quercus phellos
O
R
5.8
1.0
37.0
6
Betula nigra
R
7.1
1.1
50.0
7
Betula nigra
R
8.6
1.2
52.0
9
Betula nigra
©
R
9.9
1.3
51.0
10
Quercus michauxii
R
9.9
3.6
56.0
11
Platanus occidentalis
R
9.1
3.6
69.0
12
Taxodium distichum
O
R
7.9
3.6
59.0
13
Taxodium distichum
R
6.9
3.5
62.0
14
Taxodium distichum
O
R
5.8
3.5
58.0
15
Quercus michauxii
R
4.6
3.5
55.0
16
Quercus michauxii
O
R
3.7
3.5
58.0
17
Taxodium distichum
O
R
2.7
3.4
62.0
18
Quercus michauxii
R
1.6
3.4
50.0
19
Taxodium distichum
R
0.4
3.3
66.0
20
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
0.3
6.1
53.0
21
Quercus sp.
®
R
1.3
6.3
45.0
22
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
2.4
6.4
51.0
23
Quercus sp.
R
3.7
6.5
42.0
24
Liriodendron tulipifera
@
R
4.9
6.7
53.0
25
Diospyros virginiana
R
5.9
6.9
43.0
26
Quercus phellos
O
R
7.1
7.1
59.0
27
Liriodendron tulipifera
R
8.2
7.2
48.0
28
Betula nigra
®
R
9.1
7.3
61.0
29
Betula nigra
R
9.9
7.4
50.0
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm sprout
mmmmm�
mmmmm�
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CPS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 06122019-01-0001 Jun 2019 Data THIS YEARS DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
30 Quercus sp. O R 4.2 9.9 47.0 ❑
31 Betula nigra R 2.8 9.5 60.0 ❑
32 Quercus phellos O R' 1.3 9.2 51.0 ❑
#stems: 31 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species NaT11e Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & SnbsamplinQ**:
Heigh t Lut-0 ff (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain whytothe right): L110cm Li 50cm Li 100cm Li 137cm
Species Name
0
e
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(rite DBH)
* *Required if crt-off >10cm or subsample ? 100%. 01
•2
•
• 3
••
04
••
♦•5
••
r6
�8
�10 Form W S2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CPS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map_ of stems on plot_ 06122019-01-0001 x-axis: 200 ° # stems: 31
--
:CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems mna Z zze:
marked with lowercase letters (i.e. "A" is different from "a"). N —
Y:Sn
n
0
E
�
®
O
0
®
b
D
4)
T
C
O
O
O
0
(0,0)
X:Sm
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CPS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 06122019-01-0002
VMD Year (1-5): 1� Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
35.550128 Datum: NAD27
-78.34304 UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 256
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID
species Naine
Map
char
Source*
X Y
0.1m 0.1m
Jun 2019 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
33
Cornus florida
(�)
R
0.3
0.5
57.0
34
Platanus occidentalis
J)
R
3.0
0.9
57.0
35
Quercus lyrata
R
2.8
1.8
50.0
36
Cornus florida
R
2.5
3.2
49.0
37
Quercus michauxii
R
2.3
4.3
40.0
38
Quercus lyrata
R
2.0
5.2
36.0
39
Quercus phellos
O
R
1.9
6.3
24.0
40
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
1.8
7.2
36.0
41
Quercus sp.
®
R
1.1
9.1
48.0
42
Quercus sp.
O
R
3.7
9.9
48.0
43
Quercus sp.
O
R
4.1
8.8
45.0
44
Quercus sp.
O
R
4.2
7.8
36.0
45
Quercus sp.
R
4.4
6.5
48.0
46
Quercus sp.
O
R
4.6
5.3
26.0
47
Quercus sp.
O
R
4.9
4.1
53.0
48
Quercus lyrata
@
R
5.2
3.0
55.0
49
Quercus sp.
R
5.3
2.1
50.0
50
Quercus sp.
O
R
5.6
1.0
47.0
51
Quercus sp.
O
R
5.8
0.2
50.0
52
Quercus sp.
R
9.5
0.4
45.0
53
Quercus phellos
O
R
9.2
1.3
37.0
54
Quercus sp.
R
8.4
2.9
60.0
55
Quercus sp.
O
R
8.0
4.6
70.0
56
Quercus sp.
O
R
7.9
5.5
68.0
57
Quercus sp.
O
R
7.6
6.9
70.0
58
Quercus sp.
R
7.3
8.3
65.0
59
Quercus sp.
O
R
7.2
9.7
60.0
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm sprout
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CPS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
06122019-01-0002
Jun 2019 Data
THIS YEARS DATA
ID Sp0C10S
map source X Y
ddh Height DBH
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
char (m) (m)
(mm) (cm) (cm)
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
#sterns: 27 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Sp0C10S NaT110 Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & Snbsamplina**:
Heigh t Lut-0 ff (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain whytothe right): L110cm Li 50cm Li 100cm Li 137cm
Species Name
0
e
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(rite DBH)
* *Required if crt-off >10cm or subsample ? 100%. 01
:2
W 3
••
♦4
�•
H5
••
6
•
�8
�10 Form W S2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CPS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map_ of stems on plot_ 06122019-01-0002 X-axis: 256 ° # stems: 27
--
:CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems smallzze.
marked with lowercase letters (i.e. ' A" is different from "a").
0
Y:Sn
0
®
0
Cl)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
A�
s
(0,0)
X:Sm
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CPS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 06122019-01-0003
VMD Year (1-5): 1� Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
35.549423 Datum: NAD27
-78.34261 UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 260
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Jun 2019 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID species Naine char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* tern lcm* 1 cm sprout
60
Cephalanthus occidentalis
R
0.3
0.4
50.0
61
Malus angustifolia
®
R
1.2
3.3
33.0
62
Quercus sp.
R
2.3
2.7
53.0
63
Quercus sp.
O
R
3.5
1.9
41.0
64
Quercus nigra
O
R
4.7
1.5
41.0
65
Prunus americana
R
5.8
1.0
31.0
66
Quercus sp.
@
R
8.6
2.5
51.0
67
Quercus sp.
O
R
7.5
3.4
53.0
68
Platanus occidentalis
R
6.5
4.1
29.0
69
Platanus occidentalis
J)
R
2.0
6.1
66.0
70
Nyssa sylvatica
R
1.0
6.6
40.0
71
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
0.5
9.8
78.0
72
Quercus sp.
O
R
1.6
9.2
30.0
73
Quercus sp.
R
3.3
8.6
30.0
74
Platanus occidentalis
R
4.9
8.2
62.0
75
Taxodium distichum
O
R
7.6
8.5
67.0
76
Platanus occidentalis
R
7.8
7.1
48.0
77
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
8.6
5.0
45.0
78
Platanus occidentalis
R
9.5
9.7
51.0
#stems: 19 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CPS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
06122019-01-0003
Jun 2019 Data.
THIS YEARS DATA
ID Sp0C10S
map source X Y
ddh Height DBH
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
char (m) (m)
(mm) (cm) (cm)
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & Snbsamplina**:
Heigh t Lut-0 ff (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain whytothe right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
C
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(rite DBH)
* *Required if ctt-off >10cm or subsample ? 100%. 01
•2
•
• 3
••
♦4
••
H5
••
:6 �
•
�8
�10 Form W S2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 06122019-01-0003
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 260 °
# stems: 19
map size:
01
sm
all
N
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CPS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 06122019-01-0008
VMD Year (1-5): 1� Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
35.549514 Datum: NAD27
-78.339046 UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 105
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Jun 2019 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID species Naine char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* tern lcm* 1 cm sprout
196
Corylus americana
R
9.0
0.9
21.0
197
Corylus americana
R
7.7
0.7
26.0
198
Corylus americana
R
6.5
0.4
32.0
199
Platanus occidentalis
R
0.2
0.2
70.0
200
Quercus sp.
O
R
1.4
0.7
52.0
201
Quercus phellos
O
R
2.9
1.2
33.0
202
Quercus sp.
O
R
4.0
1.5
60.0
203
Quercus phellos
O
R
5.3
2.0
32.0
204
Quercus sp.
O
R
6.6
2.3
58.0
205
Platanus occidentalis
R
7.9
2.8
40.0
206
Nyssa biflora
R
9.2
3.1
39.0
207
Quercus sp.
R
9.4
5.7
30.0
208
Betula nigra
R
8.0
5.5
70.0
209
Quercus sp.
O
R
6.6
5.3
58.0
210
Quercus sp.
R
4.8
4.9
70.0
211
Quercus sp.
O
R
3.4
4.5
66.0
212
Nyssa biflora
O
R
1.9
4.1
45.0
213
Quercus sp.
®
R
0.5
3.9
57.0
214
Betula nigra
R
0.7
6.8
51.0
215
Quercus sp.
O
R
2.0
7.2
35.0
216
Quercus sp.
O
R
3.6
7.8
28.0
217
Platanus occidentalis
R
5.0
8.4
71.0
218
Nyssa biflora
@
R
6.5
9.1
40.0
219
Betula nigra
MjM
1.8
�
59.0
220
Betula nigra
®
R
0.6
9.3
55.0
#stems: 25 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CPS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
06122019-01-0008
Jun 2019 Data.
THIS YEARS DATA
ID Sp0C10S
map source X Y
ddh Height DBH
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
char (m) (m)
(mm) (cm) (cm)
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & Snbsamplina**:
Heigh t Lut-0 ff (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain whytothe right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
C
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(rite DBH)
* *Required if crt-off >10cm or subsample ? 100%. 01
•2
•
• 3
••
♦4
••
H5
••
:6 �
•
�8
�10 Form W S2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 06122019-01-0008
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 105 ° N #stems: 25
map size:
0 small
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. 11
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the M-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 06122019_01_0009 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): 1� Date: / / New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.550187 Datum: NAD27
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM--78.338805 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 30
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID
species Naine
Map
char
Source*
X Y
0.1m 0.1m
Jun 2019 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
221
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
0.4
0.3
78.0
222
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
0.4
2.7
50.0
223
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
0.4
4.0
50.0
224
Quercus lyrata
R
0.5
5.2
56.0
225
Quercus phellos
O
R
0.2
6.5
51.0
226
Quercus sp.
®
R
0.2
7.6
56.0
227
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
0.2
8.9
51.0
228
Quercus lyrata
R
1.3
9.2
36.0
229
Diospyros virginiana
O
R
1.5
7.4
79.0
230
Quercus sp.
O
R
2.1
5.5
60.0
231
Quercus sp.
O
R
2.1
4.0
53.0
232
Quercus sp.
R
2.2
2.8
65.0
233
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
2.2
1.5
53.0
234
Quercus sp.
O
R
4.5
1.0
38.0
235
Platanus occidentalis
(s)
R
4.5
2.3
58.0
236
Quercus lyrata
R
4.5
3.4
40.0
237
Diospyros virginiana
O
R
4.5
4.5
51.0
238
Quercus sp.
@
R
4.2
5.8
40.0
239
Quercus sp.
R
4.1
6.8
23.0
240
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
3.9
8.0
50.0
241
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
3.9
9.6
55.0
242
Quercus sp.
O
R
6.3
7.9
59.0
243
Quercus phellos
O
R
6.7
6.6
65.0
244
Quercus sp.
R
6.9
5.5
51.0
245
Quercus sp.
O
R
6.9
4.0
60.0
246
Quercus sp.
O
R
6.7
2.9
53.0
247
Quercus sp.
R
6.8
1.6
66.0
248
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
8.5
0.2
58.0
249
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
8.7
0.7
48.0
250
Quercus sp.
O
R
8.7
2.1
63.0
251
Taxodium distichum
O
R
8.7
3.2
55.0
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm sprout
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. 1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 06122019-01-0009 Jun 2019 Data THIS YEARS DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
252 Quercus sp. (H) R 8.6 5.0 60.0 ❑
253 Taxodium distichum J) R 8.6 6.5 37.0 El
254 Taxodium distichum © R 8.5 7.9 67.0
255 Taxodium distichum R 8.5 9.1 71.0
#stems: 35 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species NaT11e Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & su bsam ding* *:
Heigh t fut-0 ff (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain whytothe right): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
e
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(rite DBH)
* *Required if crt-off >10cm or subsample ? 100%. 01
•2
• 3
100 •4
N5
00
:6 �
�8
}�9
�10 Form W S2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. 1:
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map_ of stems on plot_ 06122019-01-0009 X-axis: 30 ° # stems: 35
--
:CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems N mna size:
marked with lowercase letters (i.e. "A" is different from "a").
Y:Sn
0
c
O
b
0 i
a
TI
0
0
T
0
0
O
0
O
0
0
d
B
(0,0)
X:Sm
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. 1:
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 06122019_01_0011 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): 1� Date: / / New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.54959 Datum: NAD27
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.337572 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 350
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID
species Naine
Map
char
Source*
X Y
0.1m 0.1m
Jun 2019 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
279
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
0.9
9.3
71.0
280
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
0.3
8.5
70.0
281
Platanus occidentalis
R
0.6
5.0
72.0
282
Platanus occidentalis
R
1.4
5.8
45.0
283
Platanus occidentalis
(h)
R
2.1
6.4
71.0
284
Platanus occidentalis
R
2.7
7.3
56.0
285
Platanus occidentalis
R
3.3
8.0
27.0
286
Corpus amomum
O
R
3.9
8.9
46.0
287
Platanus occidentalis
@
R
4.7
9.6
60.0
288
Quercus michauxii
R
8.4
9.8
58.0
289
Quercus michauxii
O
R
7.7
9.4
33.0
290
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
7.0
8.5
41.0
291
Quercus nigra
O
R
6.4
7.8
39.0
292
Corpus amomum
R
5.7
6.8
44.0
293
Quercus lyrata
R
5.1
5.7
30.0
294
Platanus occidentalis
R
4.4
4.9
70.0
295
Quercus lyrata
R
3.7
4.0
47.0
296
Quercus phellos
R
3.0
3.3
37.0
297
Betula nigra
J)
R
2.3
2.5
55.0
298
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
1.7
1.7
30.0
299
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
1.0
1.1
35.0
300
Platanus occidentalis
R
0.3
0.4
65.0
301
Nyssabiflora
R
4.3
0.5
55.0
302
Quercus lyrata
R
5.0
1.3
52.0
303
Quercus lyrata
R
6.5
3.0
53.0
304
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
7.1
4.0
47.0
305
Quercus lyrata
®
R
7.8
4.9
50.0
306
Quercus lyrata
©
R
8.5
6.1
46.0
307
Quercus lyrata
R
9.2
6.8
42.0
308
Nyssa aquatica
J)
R
9.8
7.5
47.0
309
Quercus sp.
(H)
R
9.8
3.4
45.0
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm sprout
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. 1.
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 06122019-01-0011 Jun 2019 Data THIS YEARS DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
310 Quercus lyrata R 9.3 2.9 41.0 ❑
311 Quercus sp. O R 8.6 1.6 48.0 El
312 Quercus sp. R 7.9 0.9 49.0
313 Corpus florida R 7.5 0.4 45.0
#stems: 35 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species NaT11e Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & su bsam ding* *:
Heigh t fut-0 ff (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain whytothe right): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
e
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(rite DBH)
* *Required if crt-off >10cm or subsample ? 100%. 01
•2
• 3
100 •4
N5
00
:6 �
�8
}�9
�10 Form W S2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. 1.
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map_ of stems on plot_ 06122019-01-0011 X-axis: 350 ° # stems: 35
--
:CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems map size:
:marked with lowercase letters (i.e. "A" is different from "a"). N small
0�
Y:Sn
D
O
0
b
0
0
I
0
O
0
O(H
O
J)
0
0
O
Da
�o
(0,0)
X:Sm
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. 11
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1