20160981 Ver 2_As Built Report_20191029

ID#* 20160981
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 10/29/2019
Mitigation Project Submittal - 10/29/2019
Version* 2
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?*
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands lF Buffer fJ Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jamey McEachran
Project Information
..................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20160981
Existing IDY
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Umle
County: Johnston
Document Information
r Yes r No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:*2
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Uwe Bank Parcel As Built Report.pdf 4.17MB
Rease upload only one RDF of the conplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Ryan Medric
Signature:*

Bank Parcel Development Plan As -Built Report
Uzzle Buffer Mitigation Site
DWR Project # 2016-0981v2
Johnston County, North Carolina
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Prepared By:
pres
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
919-829-9909
October 2019

Table of Contents
1.0 Project Summary..................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Project Location and Description..................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Project Success Criteria...................................................................................................................2
1.3 Project Components......................................................................................................................... 2
1.4 Riparian Enhancement Approach.................................................................................................... 3
1.5 Construction and As -Built Conditions............................................................................................. 4
1.6 Baseline Monitoring Performance................................................................................................... 4
2.0 Methods................................................................................................................................................... 4
3.0 Reference................................................................................................................................................ 5
Appendix A: Site Mans
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3: As -Built Plat
Figure 4: Erosion and Sediment Control Plans
Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2: Plant Species Summary
Table 3: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 4: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Appendix C: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets
i

1.0 Proiect Summary
L I Project Location and Description
EBX Neuse I, LLC (EBX), an entity of Resource Environmental Solutions (RES), is pleased to provide
this As -Built Report for the Uzzle Riparian Buffer Mitigation Bank (Parcel). This Parcel was built to
provide riparian buffer mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due to development within the Neuse
River Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC — 03020201)
(Figure 1). This Parcel is in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 and the RES Poplar Creek Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument (UMBI), made and entered into
by EBX-Neuse I, LLC acting as the Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality -Division of Water Resources (DWR). The BPDP has also been constructed in
concurrence with Uzzle Stream Mitigation Site in the Neu -Con Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation
Bank (SAW# 2016-01973). The mitigation plan for the Uzzle Stream Mitigation Bank was approved by
Interagency Review Team (IRT) in February 2019.
The Uzzle Parcel is located in Johnston County approximately six miles southeast of Clayton, North
Carolina. The Parcel is located within Neuse River Basin USGS 14-digit HUC 03020201100040, a
Targeted Local Watershed, and DWR Subbasin Number 03-04-02. To access the Parcel head West on NC
70 from the Town of Wilson Mills and turn left onto Meta Drive. The Parcel is accessible from the end of
Meta Drive. The coordinates of the site are 35.585186 N,-78.393553 W.
The easement is separated by an agricultural crossing, dividing the site into an upper and lower portion.
The upper portion of the project includes reaches LPI, LP2, LP3, LP4, and LP5. The lower portion of the
project includes reaches LP5, LP6, and LP7. The overall drainage area of the Parcel is approximately 2.05
miles squared. Little Poplar Creek (LPI, LP2, LP4, LP5, and LP7) is a perennial stream channel and the
two unnamed tributaries (LP3 and LP6) have been classified as intermittent and confirmed by DWR staff
Furthermore, it was confirmed, by DWR staff, that all riparian areas adjacent to streams associated with
this proposed bank have active cattle grazing. Stream identifications and buffer viability assessments were
performed by the DWR at the January 13, 2017 site visit.
For purposes of the Uzzle Riparian Buffer Bank, the Parcel involved enhancing riparian buffers and other
riparian areas adjacent to mitigated streams onsite. Of the 27.27 acres protected in the conservation
easement, 13.45 acres are enhanced by the removal of cattle from the streams and riparian areas for Neuse
riparian buffer credit only. The BPDP generates credit within the 20-30 foot range, 0-50 foot and 151-200
foot buffer from the proposed top of bank. Majority of the project streams have a riparian buffer of at least
50 feet, excluding crossings and a portion of LP5 and LP6 due to the parallel gas -line easement. Credit
within the 51-150 foot buffer zone was claimed for additional stream credit in the Uzzle Stream Mitigation
Bank. There is no overlap in the buffer bank credit areas and the buffer for stream credit areas. The stream
credit area is solely used for the generation of stream mitigation credits and is not used for the generation
of any other credit. Also, riparian buffer enhancement credits generated on this Bank Parcel are allowed
pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6) but are not used to generate nutrient offset credits.
Uzzle Buffer I Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2019

1.2 Project Success Criteria
Annual vegetation monitoring is to occur each year for a minimum of five (5) years and is to be conducted
during the fall season with the first year occurring at least 5 months from initial planting. As part of the
stream mitigation plan 3.6 acres was planted and four monitoring plots were installed a minimum of 100
in in size. These plots cover at least two percent of the planted mitigation area for the Stream Mitigation
Bank. All four plots are within the riparian buffer that are measuring success of both the stream mitigation
and the buffer riparian area. Data for the plots is to be provided in the Monitoring reports, as a courtesy to
the DWR. The following data is to be recorded for all trees in the plots: species, height, planting date (or
volunteer), and grid location. All stems in plots are to be flagged with flagging tape. Photos are to be taken
from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in the annual reports. Visual inspections and
photos are to be taken to ensure that enhancement areas are being maintained and compliant. The measures
of vegetative success for the parcel are based on the Uzzle Stream Mitigation Plan (Action ID #SAW-2016-
01973). Invasive and noxious species are to be monitored and controlled so that none become dominant or
alter the desired community structure of the site.
A visual assessment of the cattle exclusion areas within the conservation easement is to be performed each
year with all observations provided in the annual monitoring reports, to confirm:
• Fencing is in good condition throughout the site;
• no cattle access within the conservation easement area;
no encroachment has occurred;
diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservation easement area; and
there has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would
negatively affect the functioning of the buffer.
RES is to monitor the stream mitigation bank for a minimum of seven years, or until IRT approval.
Therefore, all plots will be monitored in accordance with the monitoring protocol in the Uzzle Stream
Mitigation Plan.
1.3 Project Components
This Bank generates approximately 6.17 acres (268,834.036 ft2) of buffer enhancement credits. The
approximately 0.21 acre decrease in creditable area following the as -built was due to the removal of buffer
areas less than 20 feet from the top of bank. The riparian buffer mitigation credits generated service Neuse
buffer impacts within the USGS 8-digit HUC 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin, excluding the Fall Lake
Watershed. The Sponsor is to maintain one credit ledger. Th one ledger shall account for buffer
enhancement credits. All mitigation credit assets shall be shown on this credit ledger. The total potential
mitigation credits that the Uzzle Bank generates are summarized below.
Uzzle Buffer 2 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2019

Riparian Buffer Credit
Credit
Riparian
Credit
Mitigation Type
Existing
Used
Per
Ratio
% Full
Mitigation Assets
Zone
Type
Acreage
Acreage
Acre
Credit
(ftZ)
20-30'
Riparian
Enhancement
.09
.09
43,560
2:1
75%
1,407.750 ftZ (0.03 ac)
Buffer
0-50'
Riparian
Enhancement
12.08
12.08
43,560
2:1
100%
255,773.500 ftZ (5.87 ac)
Buffer
151-200'
Riparian
Enhancement
1.58
1.58
43,560
2:1
33%
11,652.795 ftZ (0.27 ac)
Buffer
268,834.036 ftZ (6.172 ac)
Total Enhancements
13.45
includes ratios & reductions
1.4 Riparian Enhancement Approach
Preparation of the Parcel involved spraying exotic invasive species, contoured ripping, seeding, and
planting. Livestock were completely removed from Parcel, in perpetuity by way of conservation easement
and installation of fencing. After construction activities, the subsoil was scarified, and any compaction was
deep tilled before the topsoil was placed back over the site. Any topsoil that was removed during
construction was stockpiled and placed over the site during final soil preparation. This process provides
favorable soil conditions for plant growth. Bare root plantings and live stakes were planted according to the
planting plan.
Enhancement occurred in areas of grazing adjacent to the stream in accordance with the Consolidated
Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6). Where livestock was present, RES installed cattle
exclusion fencing to prohibit access to riparian areas and their associated streams. All fencing was installed
to NRCS specifications.
Riparian enhancement adjacent to streams was approved by the DWR in their Buffer Viability letter dated
January 13, 2017. All enhancement activities began from the tops of the stream banks and extended outward
a maximum of 200 feet perpendicular to the stream channel where possible pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (effective November 1, 2015). It is important to note that areas along all reaches, between the 50-
150-foot buffer width zone, within the project was used to generate additional stream credit for the Uzzle
Stream Mitigation Bank. This area is solely being used for the generation of stream mitigation credits and
is not be used for the generation of any other credit. Buffer crediting is generated from the 0-50 foot and
151-200-foot buffer width zones, with a small area of credit being generated within the 20-30-foot buffer
zone due to project limitation with a gas line easement. Buffer enhancement can only generate buffer
mitigation credit and is not transferrable into nutrient offset credits.
All riparian enhancement activities commenced in concurrence with the stream mitigation activities and
not before. Restoration activities based on the design approach included meandering the proposed channel
within the natural valley, backfilling the existing stream channel, and reconnecting a new channel to its
floodplam. Diffuse flow is to be maintained throughout the mitigated riparian areas.
Uzzle Buffer 3 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2019

1.5 Construction and As -Built Conditions
Revegetation of the site included treating invasive species and planting native hardwood bare root trees in
areas where stream restoration occurred. Prior to planting, RES prepped the site by spraying and ripping
that section of the easement. Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp is the target community type and was used
for all areas within the project. The community is defined by Schafale and Weakely (2012). The planting
of bare root trees occurred in May 2019. Deviations from the initial planting plan were due to bare root
availability. A list of the planted species can be found in Table 2.
Stream construction activities were completed in May 2019. RES submitted a Stream As -Built Report in
July 2019 to USACE and conducted a site visit in July 2019 with no comments. The site was constructed
in accordance with the Approved Mitigation Plan and associated permits. RES acquired 404 (SAW-2016-
01973), 401 (DWR # 2016-0981), and NPDES Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (JC# 19-012-P; Figure
4) Permits. The conservation easement is marked every 150-200 feet with North Carolina Wildlife Habitat
Foundation signs attached to either fences or t-posts. A fence was installed around the entire easement as
livestock were present throughout.
1.6 Baseline Monitoring Performance
The Uzzle Baseline Monitoring activities were completed in May 2019. All Baseline Monitoring data is
present below and in the appendices. The Site is on track to meeting vegetation and stream interim success
criteria.
Monitoring of the four permanent vegetation plots was completed during May 2019. Vegetation tables and
transect data are in Appendix B and associated photos are in Appendix C. MYO monitoring data indicates
that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities
ranged from 1,133 to 1,497 planted stems per acre with a mean of 1,285 planted stems per acre across all
plots. A total of 15 species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species were not noted at baseline
monitoring but are expected to establish in upcoming years. The average tree height observed was 1.7 feet.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the project.
2.0 Methods
Vegetation success is being monitored at four permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation plot monitoring
follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes
analysis of species composition and density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry
tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal
conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the origin each monitoring year.
Uzzle Buffer 4 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2019

3.0 Reference
Environmental Banc & Exchange — Neuse I, LLC (2018). Uzzle Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site — Bank Parcel
Development Plan
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
NCDENR. 2009. "Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan." Division of Water Quality. http://
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpu/basin/neuse/2009. (October 2013).
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 - Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Uzzle Buffer 5 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2019

Appendix A
Site Maps

1
T
Friendly Check Cashing9
dr,p qd
A Raleigh9 &aCisco qa
Ins u ra rice Aut o Aucti on 6 9
Carolina Comfort Air 9
ME
IBethesda Baptist Church 9
MP
IS
Bailey's
Automotive Repair TT
MIDTOWN IP
MOTORS OF NC
8
c
' Legen
-
c.rr:, Rd
Conservation Easement
Fowler's Nursery9
DayCo Manufacturing 9
uxr� or
�o To
ycle Center y
are9 3
Edgewood
10P� CustomCabinetry
ning9 a-
Southern Accent 4
Shutters and Blinds
1913
TO
Al Custom Meats
d
Wilson Mills
Mini Storage
e�P�
Ozp
N
,,�`P u a
0 v
Interstate Ministries 4 `�
The Mortgage Buses 9
To -
C & S Properties9
N Date: 10/25/2019
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
w _ F Drawn by: RTM res
Uzzle Buffer/Nutrient Site
s Checked by: BPB
0 500 1,0
Johnston County, North Carolina
1 inch = 1,000 feet
Feet

0 .000000
IM
af
ZI
13
fires
\N
0 125 250
Feet
Figure 2
Current Conditions
Plan View
Ik
MYO 2019
Uzzle Buffer/Nutrient Site
0 Johnston County, NC
Date 10/25/2019 Drawn by RTM
Lat 35.590264 Long: -78.394629
LEGEND
Conservation Easement
Vegetation Plot
Buffer Crediting
Enhancement (20-30')
Enhancement (31-50')
Enhancement (151-200')
Stream Alignment
Veaetation Condition Assessment
U) Target Community
2D Present Marginal Absent
U
W Absent
0. No Fill
U)
Present

it
!p]r£
!. C>]YdriYD iACIPP 6 Q9aA�6T.a
z x LGTAfAl kr roruara cwcu97 �• vx
fm a L,EQaays rfrRra� wwr�s rnc7ansF A X7rca
�Au ulefr� AAF saQwX av nas s[wtr,
nr erarnssc rr n4s sr aln• a w anew rXr aw-+£c icwx
A4411A P riL ARL4 Or slo 9WiFF Zlrir`. M] r+ Fnr✓
DE affJA e...... aLAC scrtK1FD AT fK5 rM£.
A Amomer LKs Ar aG A aNL141371 view 8r ;m
apt W mm GimreLT ad PAar ]T! Y! ill A')MSiAV
c+z.rrr +6FccIR ar 7[Tns:
US HWY. 70
PUBLIC R/W WIDTH VARIES
20' crrsFr r Iq
50' OFFSET
smwm W.
- 4 4i
a!! rc IS
1+
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
AREA I
2M' GFTFXT
'w. OFFset
�• OrFSFT
r5O• OrFAT-
cm�r • ircraomr
fJ6 .ifl, PC S60
RIPARIAN BUFFER CREDIT
RIPARIAN ZONE
MITIGATIONTYPE
AREA(Sa FT.)
AREA(ACRES)
0.50'(9UFFER WIDTH �W &i 30'I
ENF mamENT
3,754
0.09
0.50'(0uFFEil WIDTH x37)
ENHANCEMENT
511,i47
11-74
151-200'
ENHANCEMENT
70,623
1.67
TOTAL ENHANCEMENT
595,924
13.45
CQvsF�40VAOe
FA&artXr Aor�ice WA
(ar
ANEA I M7.a6]
ACt
F P . >!a6] Atl
W.- 2l.2m KY
Lemy
IMF LY WY
o . Xv rover $7'
tfij - .allD
------ - �1r�c Reorbwr Ln[
Roe-CoNs"Upmo n000s w
•� •..� �.+.�++i - c+alca3lanne aasnrtXr feel-vu nnr wvxfca
cv
�- Rrm p�' Q', laiaFOE wrX >w'7
®- Kfm oa4vieeemrr (15r•-zoo)
Lva a uisu
aB fTS6, YG 1]a
Ql�
1'elk
rYne rmwlL we- '�,'�
oY 160y PC 76n ,�qqqlLL,
57. OFFWr3
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
AREA 2
I
f
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
}
Xos cAen Lrrimaprr uc
rp
-
ra r�L Pc 4r1
VXWTY MAP
(nnr m v r)
FAS,EAIENT LIME TABLE
4AC /I
AWCnOW
Iwar
!f
5 36T w- ■
1,uil'
ez
X a7'ra lo'r
rsAaz'
!.
X aa'.T67Y E
ib.i7'
LS
s opww' Y
57m,
!a
s me'ff" C
mu-06'
Lr
s 6a'4F7.1 w
sm.16'
La
5 /6'10'.1" r
66.a0'
LIO
s o.Ta6'ST" F
7.9.Fd'
Lrr (1!f
S �a.fW F
6f.R'
L IY
s .SM W' F
Y116Y'
cm
5 2d .,"7- E
JSLAY
L I.
S ] F'O' r
23. 62'
LI.5
s 76•XS7'r
tt ul
00
X M•ST',r, F
vio.
!fi
s aSM'ml F
=25'
Lfa
s ar'. . C
Imia'
36TN7P" F
i6"",
706 o im mo ova aoo
l w rear �
I L-h - 200 M
$ati1�1K Ic � glgt ��r
zQ
=
�,4 L4717 �s}
�r 'ygg • to
vlur Xo.
ior
��
r71N11! R-
P1110
1
10
n
H
Z
0
—
W
�
-
Z
U
to
Z
j
F-
Z
Z
Q
W
m �
r
Q
H CC
~
W
Z
J
Z
N
Lu
N
Z
W
�
�0
U■
W
tlix
�g
Laa!
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
906 N. OU£EN ST„ SUITE
KINSTON, NC 28501
A
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
FIRM LIC.
,f P-022I
EMAIL: surveyor�motrixeast.ne!
JRW � 9/27/2019 1"�a 200'
sol7ooa7
Awe
U IZLE PUFFER la.4A.4WG

LEGEND
EASTING TREELINE rah
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE -LEO LOD-
PROPOSED CONSERVATION EASEMENT•
1 SILT FENCE - - - - - - -
`♦� ` STAGINGISTOCKPILE AREA
ICONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
111roll
HAUL ROUTE
0
1p
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
PROPOSED PUMP AROUND LOCATION ^Q
'r• i f - - - - _ ROCK PIPE INLET PROTECTION
TOTAL AREA OF DISTURBANCE- 11.4 ACRES
�_ TOTAL AREA OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT: 27.a ACRES
g
Q07�
yr. .��� _: • ��_ .---�---�� _ - �-
4.
!r ! - . REACH I.P2 PERMIT BOX
:Jr . ems✓ 1,- @ -.,�• 1
rt, -
MATCH LINE SEE DWG NO. ESC2
Q,W.K.pIG(90N8C0-,IRC. ALL FtlGH[SRE.SERYEO. REPROOUCTIONCRLI$E OFTHE CONTENTS OF TFyS DOOL111ENT. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS DDCUAENT, IN WHOLE OR INP WRITTEN CO"Saf OF WJL DICKSON B CO., INC., PROHIBITED. ONLY COPIES mm THE ORQINNAL OF THIS DOCUMENT. MARKED WITH AN INAL SIGNATURE AAA SHALL BE ODWIRERF@ TO SE VALID, TRUE COPIES.
FILE NAME:O:LProje Jana Em9rmme w Stlulon 2017021200RA - 7014 uu1F MaymlM Sne%CADUPIen 6e1=17024200RA SFR_ESG P lAAwQ_Fe6nr9rT 6. 2019 • HoX¢e
DDI&SON
c munity4* uch"c Wm
TY IPoRa W + Wa RBeaw
Lkb_ I3"wrr m + Geametxs
720 OorpQm10 Onus
Relelgh. NO 27807
I 919.782.0496
V919.7S29N372
w .wkdldrwn.wm
IICux y
03 96
GINIi .•;r1
�7iArflritNViVN�
FULL SCALE: 1— of
0 100 200
2^ - FULL SCALE
�FV4LF 3 T��'
o
0
v
a
}
w
8 QN I 2 LL
Y I
1 cc 1i ¢ z
+Ijz
I
f
LJ
I
PBD,1-DATE: IJAN 20,9
O.C.' DNP
O.O- DATE: IJAN. 201 S
DRAWNJG NUMBER:
ES1
PRDJ. N0.:
201702420OFtA
�z
z2
T
=
a
W
r 2
�
7 �
p¢
W
❑❑ C
[7
p
2
N ?S d
Em

U I,
wci
_
L7 • • I _ ."� .�' CLOD LOD
REACH LP --REACH LP5
W
ElJ= `....
z x ter._ �- A
... ....... .
•
1
REACH LP3 !
I
I
6
REACH 3P7
-...- -'. '. .• �• it __'���.'. .•. .. •• •' .a+i� ,',•. � �..
fe
1i A
REACH LPS �r+• 'r'
�:.f �'" i �. • : •'.. 7s�•,',1iz
•� w-�'.•.•.g���'�=• � tom•---�:•••• ,.,. �• .. ..... _ ... w.
lop,
�.' -r S I'``-- _'.�'" _ __ �°`,�-,• ..�1
�� � f _L^1�--�_� AI � � ..ice. �..�•
lip IN
M0
EXISTING TREELINE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE-IAR-LGP-
PROPOSED CONSERVATION EASEMENT •
SILT FENCE - - - - - - -
STAGINGlSTOCKPILE AREA __ 1
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
HAUL ROUTE
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING T�
PROPOSED PUMP AROUND LOCATION�`�
ROCK PIPE INLET PROTECTION n
TOTAL AREA OF DISTURBANCE: 11.4ACRES
TOTAL AREA OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT: 27.3 ACRES
DD CKSON
convirumly infra uB—limm
harmpoAwlk • WIImr FOerourcea
Ud— De W pAr t + c -
72D Corporate Orrva
Raleigh. NC 27H07
EN W9-762-0495
vnwr w, 5.782.9672
. kdlCkgpn.Carn
rw fa.A�.
¢¢ SEALN
iu�i�`
2.5• ZD!°I
FULL SCALE: 1'=IW
0 100 200
�x - PALL sC'.41 F
HALF 3CALE�'
m_
a
a
a
IX
�IX
k
ca
N
��
Ill Z
0 x v_
° c�
LU 8
� 5wyy
WyjW
¢O ❑
PROQ.0ATE: JAN.2019
O.C.: DNP
O.C. DATE: JAN. 2019
DRAWING NUMBER:
ESC2
PROD. NO.:
2017024200RA

Appendix B
Vegetation Assessment Data

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2. Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Scientific Name
Total Stems Planted
Water Oak
Quercus nigra
1,800
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus michauxii
1,100
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
900
Bald Cypress
Taxodium distichum
800
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
700
Blackgum
Nyssa sylvatica
700
Green Ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
600
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
600
River Birch
Betula ni ra
500
Overcup Oak
Quercus lyrata
400
Tuli tree
Liriodendron tuli i era
400
Flowering Dogwood
Cornus florida
400
Buttonbush
Ce halanthus occidentalis
300
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
300
American Hazelnut
Cor lus americana
300
Totall
9,800
Table 3. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Success
Average
Plante d
Volunteer
Total
Plot #
Criteria
Stem
Stems/Acre
Stems/Acre
Stems/Acre
Met?
Height (ft)
1
1376
0
1376
Yes
1.6
2
1497
0
1497
Yes
1.6
3
1133
0
1133
Yes
1.8
4
1133
0
1133
Yes
1.8
Project Avg
1285
0
1285
Yes
1.7

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 4. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Uzzle
Current Plot Data
(MYO 2019)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
05302019-01-0001
05302019-01-0002
05302019-01-0003
05302019-01-0004
MYO
(2019)
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
6
6
6
1
1
1
2
2
21
10
10
10
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cornus amomum
s dogwood
Shrub
3
3
3
2
2
2
5
5
5
Cornus florida
flowering dogwood
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Diospyros virginiana
common ersimmon
Tree
2
2
2
2
21
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
2
4
4
4
6
6
6
Liriodendron tuhpifera
tuhptree
Tree
5
5
5
2
2
2
1
1
1
8
8
8
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
8
8
8
5
5
5
13
13
13
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
11
11
11
18
18
18
Quercus
oak
Tree
17
17
17
11
11
11
2
2
2
5
5
5
35
35
35
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus pheflos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
6
6
6
1
1
1
8
8
8
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
4
4
4
6
6
6
4
4
4
2
21
2
16
16
16
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
341
34
34
37
37
37
28
28
28
28
281
28
1271
127
127
1
1
1
1
4
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.10
8
8
8
71
7
7
11
11
11
8
8
8
15
15
15
1376
1376
1376
1497
1497
1497
11331
11331
1133
11331
11331
11331
12851
12851
1285

Appendix C
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Uzzle MYO Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1
Vegetation Plot 3
Vegetation Plot 2
Vegetation Plot 4

Appendix D
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets

Plot (continued): 05302019-01-0001 May 2019 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (arm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05302019-01-0001 arty: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): F171 Date: / / _ New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.590498 Datum: NAD27
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.39564 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): L 195
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID
Species Name
Map
char
Source*
X Y
0.1m 0.1m
May 2019 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
2
Quercus sp.
O
R
0.4
0.3
25.0
3
Quercus sp.
O
R
1.4
2.4
49.0
5
Quercus sp.
O
R
2.6
2.7
39.0
6
Quercus sp.
O
R
3.8
2.6
40.0
7
Quercus sp.
@
R
4.9
1.9
50.0
8
Quercus sp.
O
R
6.2
1.4
50.0
9
Quercus sp.
R
7.4
1.0
39.0
10
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
8.8
0.7
48.0
11
Betula nigra
R
9.7
3.0
61.0
12
Taxodium distichum
R
8.5
3.1
21.0
13
Taxodium distichum
R
7.2
3.4
59.0
14
Taxodium distichum
O
R
6.0
4.1
50.0
15
Taxodium distichum
Cr)
R
4.9
4.6
51.0
16
Quercus sp.
O
R
3.9
4.9
51.0
17
Quercus sp.
O
R
2.9
5.2
53.0
18
Quercus sp.
(j)
R
1.4
5.3
55.0
19
Quercus sp.
O
R
0.3
4.9
50.0
20
Quercus sp.
®
R
0.3
7.1
41.0
21
Quercus sp.
O
R
1.3
7.2
55.0
22
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
2.1
7.3
55.0
23
Quercus nigra
(aj)
R
3.4
7.5
50.0
24
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
4.8
7.4
45.0
25
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
5.7
7.0
53.0
26
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
7.2
6.7
61.0
27
Quercus sp.
©
R
8.2
6.0
63.0
28
Quercus sp.
O
R
9.4
5.8
64.0
29
Quercus nigra
O
R
9.0
8.1
61.0
30
Quercus sp.
®
R
8.0
8.5
55.0
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm sprout
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 05302019-01-0001 May 2019 Data THIS YEARS DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (arm) (cm) (cm) sprout
31 Platanus occidentalis R 6.5 9.0 68.0 ❑
32 Quercus sp. O R 5.2 9.5 61.0
33 Quercus phellos R 4.2 9.8 25.0
34 Platanus occidentalis J) R 3.2 9.8 76.0
35 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 1.8 9.9 26.0 ❑
36 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R =5 9.6 54.0 ❑
#stems: 34 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Ex DIanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamnlinQ**:
Height Lut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
e
SEEDLINGS—
HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS—
DBH
TREES— DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(,rite DBH)
* *Re quimd if cLt-off >10cm or subsample ? 100%. 01
•2
•
• 3
••
• *4
••
N5
••
:6
•
�8
}�m{ 9
�10 Form W S2, ver 9.1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot_ 05302019-01-0001 X-axis: 195 ° # stems: 34
----------- map size:
,CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems small
�marked with lowercase letters (i.e. "A" is different from "a"). N -0
Y:Sm
h
1
®
0
O
O
O
O
b
u0
©
O
Da
r
0
0
0
0
0
c
L
(0,0)
X:Sm
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05302019_01_0002 arty: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-�: Date: / / 7 7 New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.590355 Datum: NAD27
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.39523 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): L 324
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID
Species Name
Map
char
Source*
X Y
0.1m 0.1m
May 2019 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
N
38
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
0.7
0.4
77.0
39
Quercus phellos
O
R
0.6
1.7
47.0
40
Quercus phellos
®
R
0.6
3.3
44.0
41
Quercus phellos
O
R
0.6
4.7
57.0
42
Quercus phellos
O
R
0.6
6.3
55.0
43
Quercus phellos
(g)
R
0.9
7.7
60.0
44
Platanus occidentalis
R
0.5
8.8
70.0
45
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
3.0
9.8
50.0
46
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
2.8
8.6
52.0
47
Quercus sp.
R
2.8
7.2
32.0
48
Betula nigra
R
2.6
5.8
60.0
49
Quercus phellos
O
R
2.4
4.7
59.0
50
Quercus sp.
O
R
2.1
3.3
49.0
51
Cornus amomum
O
R
2.1
1.9
48.0
52
Quercus sp.
O
R
2.2
0.6
50.0
53
Quercus sp.
O
R
4.5
1.1
42.0
54
Platanus occidentalis
R
4.2
2.3
47.0
55
Quercus sp.
R
4.1
3.7
25.0
56
Cornus amomum
O
R
4.4
5.1
52.0
57
Quercus sp.
R
4.7
6.3
31.0
58
Quercus sp.
O
R
4.9
8.1
39.0
59
Quercus sp.
O
R
5.4
9.4
31.0
60
Betula nigra
R
8.3
9.7
50.0
61
Betula nigra
©
R
7.9
8.4
54.0
62
Betula nigra
R
7.6
7.1
52.0
63
Betula nigra
R
7.0
6.2
48.0
64
Quercus sp.
O
R
6.7
4.9
47.0
65
Taxodium distichum
O
R
6.4
3.6
40.0
66
Taxodium distichum
R
6.7
2.2
23.0
67
Taxodium distichum
O
R
6.7
1.1
46.0
68
Betula nigra
R
8.4
1.1
51.0
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm sprout
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 05302019-01-0002 May 2019 Data THIS YEARS DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (arm) (cm) (cm) sprout
69 Quercus sp. R 8.3 2.1 50.0 ❑
70 Taxodium distichum O R 8.3 2.9 56.0
71 Cornus amomum R 8.5 3.8 44.0 ❑
72 Taxodium distichum O R 8.6 5.0 50.0 ❑
73 Quercus sp. O R 8.7 5.9 51.0
74 Taxodium distichum O R 9.0 6.9 40.0 ❑
#stems: 37 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* tern Vigor* Damage* Notes
Ex DIanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamnlinQ**:
Height Lut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
e
SEEDLINGS—
HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS—
DBH
TREES— DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(,rite DBH)
* *Re quimd if cLt-off >10cm or subsample ? 100%. 01
•2
•
• 3
••
• *4
••
N5
••
:6
•
�8
}�m{ 9
�10 Form W S2, ver 9.1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot_ O53O2O19-01-0002 x-axis: 324' #stems: 37
------------ map size:
,CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems
��marked with lowercase letters (i.e. "A" is different from "a"). " small
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ N
Y:Sm
o
O
O
On
O
®
K
0
T
T
O
®
4)
O
0
�
0
(0,0)
X:Sm
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05302019_01_0003 arty: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-�: Date: / / 7 7 New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.589926 Datum: NAD27
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.39545 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): L 210
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID
Species Name
Map
char
Source*
X Y
0.1m 0.1m
May 2019 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
N
75
Corpus florida
R
3.3
1.0
40.0
76
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
3.9
2.1
50.0
77
Diospyros virginiana
O
R
5.2
2.3
55.0
78
Diospyros virginiana
O
R
6.7
2.2
61.0
79
Corpus amomum
O
R
8.1
2.1
51.0
80
Corpus amomum
®
R
9.4
2.0
76.0
81
Taxodium distichum
R
8.7
4.5
70.0
82
Nyssa sylvatica
R
7.3
4.6
53.0
83
Liriodendron tulipifera
R
6.0
5.3
45.0
84
Taxodium distichum
R
4.7
5.3
53.0
85
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
3.4
5.3
41.0
86
Taxodium distichum
O
R
2.4
5.0
63.0
87
Taxodium distichum
(rD
R
1.4
4.3
36.0
88
Nyssa sylvatica
R
0.9
3.1
55.0
89
Quercus phellos
®
R
0.7
2.0
52.0
90
Quercus sp.
O
R
0.6
0.6
56.0
91
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
0.5
7.9
55.0
92
Nyssa sylvatica
(g)
R
1.6
8.2
63.0
93
Nyssa sylvatica
R
2.9
7.9
51.0
94
R
4.1
8.0
36.0
95
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
(p)
R
5.3
7.9
59.0
96
Nyssa sylvatica
R
6.5
7.7
40.0
97
Nyssa sylvatica
R
7.7
7.5
55.0
98
Nyssa sylvatica
R
8.8
7.1
44.0
99
Platanus occidentalis
R
9.2
9.5
74.0
100 Betulanigra
R
8.1
9.6
58.0
101
Nyssa sylvatica
R
7.0
9.8
48.0
10WPlatanus occidentalis 0 R 0.2 9.9 70.0 ❑
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm sprout
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
05302019-01-0003
May 2019 Data
THIS YEARS DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
ddh Height DBH
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
char (m) (m)
(mm) (cm) (cm)
(min) (cm) (cm) sprout
#sterns: 28 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampline**:
Height Lut-Off (All stems shorterthan this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): Li 10cm Li 50cm Li 100cm Li 137cm
Species Name
0
e
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(,rite DBH)
**Required if crt-off >10cm or subsample ? 100%. 101
•2
•3
♦164
♦•5
6
::8
}�3
;r0 Form WS2,ver9.1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot_ O53O2O19-01-0003 x-axis: 210' #stems: 28
----------- map size:
CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems ��
�marked with lowercase letters (i.e. "A" is different from "a"). r J small
N �/
Y:Sm
a
t
0
0
O
O
®
0
(i)
r
O
0 v
0
9
4)
O
0
0
0
F
(0,0)
X:Sm
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05302019_01_0004 arty: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-�: Date: / / 7 7 New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.589301 Datum: NAD27
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.39560 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): L 250
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID
Species Name
Map
char
Source*
X Y
0.1m 0.1m
May 2019 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
N
104
Quercus sp.
R
4.2
0.3
42.0
105
Quercus sp.
R
5.2
1.2
39.0
106
Nyssa sylvatica
Cs)
R
6.3
2.0
29.0
107
Nyssa sylvatica
R
7.5
2.7
41.0
108
Nyssa sylvatica
R
8.6
3.3
47.0
109
Platanus occidentalis
R
9.7
6.0
74.0
110
Cephalanthus occidentalis
R
8.4
5.5
43.0
ill
Platanus occidentalis
R
7.2
5.3
70.0
112
Platanus occidentalis
R
6.0
4.4
62.0
113
Platanus occidentalis
R
4.8
3.7
76.0
114
Nyssa sylvatica
R
3.6
3.2
43.0
115
Platanus occidentalis
R
2.5
2.1
80.0
116
Betula nigra
®
R
1.3
1.2
48.0
117
Quercus lyrata
R
0.5
0.3
44.0
118
Quercus sp.
®
R
0.5
3.6
57.0
119
Quercus michauxii
O
R
1.5
4.4
55.0
120
Taxodium distichum
O
R
2.6
5.2
63.0
121
Platanus occidentalis
R
3.7
5.9
46.0
122
Platanus occidentalis
R
5.0
6.5
71.0
123
Betula nigra
R
6.3
7.4
54.0
124
Platanus occidentalis
R
7.3
8.4
77.0
125
Taxodium distichum
O
R
8.4
8.5
53.0
126
Platanus occidentalis
R
6.3
9.8
36.0
127
Quercus sp.
R
5.3
9.5
43.0
128
Quercus sp.
O
R
4.1
8.6
47.0
129
Platanus occidentalis
R
2.9
8.0
55.0
130
Platanus occidentalis
(rD
R
1.7
7.2
58.0
131
Nyssa sylvatica
(�)
R
0.6
6.5
49.0
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm sprout
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
05302019-01-0004
May 2019 Data
THIS YEARS DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
ddh Height DBH
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
char (m) (m)
(mm) (cm) (cm)
(min) (cm) (cm) sprout
#sterns: 28 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampline**:
Height Lut-Off (All stems shorterthan this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): Li 10cm Li 50cm Li 100cm Li 137cm
Species Name
0
e
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(,rite DBH)
**Required if crt-off >10cm or subsample ? 100%. 101
•2
•3
♦164
♦•5
6
::8
}�3
;r0 Form WS2,ver9.1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot_ O53O2O19-01-0004 X-axis: 250° #stems: 28
----------- map size:
,CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems
��marked with lowercase letters (i.e. "A" is different from "a"). 0 small
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------' ���//
N
Y:Sm
u
O
0
0
0
0
®
no
0
a
m
L
(0,0)
X:Sm
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1