20170239_RE_ _External_ Reforestation for 119 possible revision_20191029

Carpenter, Kristi
From: Norton, April R
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2019 1:02 PM
To: Della Moore
Subject: RE: [External] Reforestation for 119 possible revision
Thanks, Della.
I have reviewed the plans associated with the 401 WQC for the Mebane Bypass and the Erosion and Sediment Control
plans. The streambank reforestation hatching is not clear on the approved plans. DWR does not object to the riprap
remaining in place as stated in your recommendations below, provided that Roadside Environmental is fine with this
modification, and as long as there aren't specific mitigation requirements. I'd also like to ensure that the floodplain
benches are constructed according to the plans.
Please let me know if you have any question.
Thanks,
April
From: Della Moore <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 4:26 PM
To: Norton, April R <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [External] Reforestation for 119 possible revision
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
Hello April,
I'm sorry I think I sent you the wrong attachment. The plan sheet is EC-40A/Constl0; it was permit site
7 (triple barrel culvert).
Thanks,
Della Moore
Environmental Assistant Engineer
FIL
1101 East Wendover Ave, Suite 200
Greensboro, NC 27405
336-334-3515P 1 443-983-1580 C
www.rkk.com
Responsive People 1 Creative Solutions
IM © 0
From: Norton, April R <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 1:38 PM

To: Della Moore <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] Reforestation for 119 possible revision
Hi Della. The plan sheet that was attached is difficult to view. Could you please provide me with the permit drawing
sheet number and site number?
After a quick overview, it seems as though it will be fine for the riprap to remain in place; however, I'll have to take a
look at the plan sheets and/or mitigation plans to confirm .
Thanks,
April
From: Della Moore <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 4:23 PM
To: Norton, April R <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Reforestation for 119 possible revision
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
Hi April,
Project C203844 (119) have noticed they have installed riprap where reforestation is suppose to go on the
embankment at culvert 7.
This is one of the site we looked at during your last visit. The plans call for reforestation along the
embankments of this culvert to start 4 feet from the stream's bed (see hatchet marks on the plan sheet).
If you look at the photo, they have gone above the 4' with riprap on the right inlet side of the culvert. The left
inlet side has applicable space and so does the outlet side, however, the question arose: would they need to
remove the riprap and install the plant as per the reforestation details or could they keep the embankment's
riprap and find other suitable areas along the embankment for reforestation?
My suggestion is to keep the existing riprap in place due to the flooding issues and how high the water gets up
in this section and use the surrounding disturbed areas (around the existing embankment) to makeup for the
plants required to accommodate the 0.3 acres. I have not had this issue before and I was asked to get your
feedback on how to approach a fix.
Please review, if you have questions for clarification, feel free to give me a call.
Thanks,
Della Moore
Environmental Assistant Engineer
1101 East Wendover Ave, Suite 200
Greensboro, NC 27405

336-334-3515P 1 443-983-1580 C
www.rkk.com
Responsive People I Creative Solutions
E
M LO
"RK&K" and "RK&K Engineers" are registered trade names of Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP, a Maryland limited liability partnership. This message contains
confidential information intended only for the person or persons named above. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the
sender by return email and delete the message. Thank you.
RK&K is an equal opportunity employer that values diversity at all levels. RK&K does not discriminate in employment on the basis of race, color, religion, sex
(including pregnancy), national origin, political affiliation, sexual orientation, marital status, disability, genetic information, age, parental status, military and
veteran status, and any other characteristic protected by applicable law. Consistent with the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as
amended and other nondiscrimination laws and authorities, we also note that RK&K does not discriminate in its selection or retention of subcontractors on
the grounds of race, color, or national origin. We also note that RK&K will ensure that Minorities will be afforded full opportunity to submit proposals and not
be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in consideration for an award.