Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout670011_Inspection_20191015Facility Number 0 - F1 t 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: IS Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: .® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: IITT ArrivalTime: J'A A in NIV-U I Departure Time: County: Farm Name: P. I` . Cox CCTY rat'^ Owner Email: Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: ':TA Pit CDlo Integrator: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Swine Wean to Finish Wean to Feedej Feeder to Finis] Farrow to Weai Farrow to Feed Other Other Latitude: Region: Phone: q 10 330 6Y33 Certification Number: Certification Number: Design Current Design Current Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Layer <)I INon-Layer Design Current Dry Poultry CanaeitV Poo. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Discharges and Stream Imoacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? Longitude: Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes ©'No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No �A ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No L NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes DIM ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued Facili Number: fol( Date of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes mNo ❑ N j ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No i NNA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: q b Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): 1 a, Observed Freeboard (in): 33 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes E57No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes JA/No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. dYes [—]No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ /Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) bN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. ❑ Yes Q'lgo ❑ Yes �/Io ❑ Yes [3 o ❑ Yes [3No ❑ Yes EK ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑,NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑ Yes E�<o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E] o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes ❑ o ❑ NALj 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: Date of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 040 ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. []Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? [:]Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [—]No [ZNA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [],14o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes / No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No © NA 2[*NE ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). Iv9 ju�ve j Av4 zoi '001 e D nr � - F;�c '�3S \o t kC1 �F W 0 P aMch�t,r.� �C_ CY ) $sec Reviewer/InspectorName: �^C� � V' h Phone: q1 1672A S/' Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _—�// Date: (� 1 Page 3 of 3 2141415