Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310852_Inspection_20191003Division of Water Resources Facility Number - Z771� 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: XRoutine 0 Complaint ® Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: i OIZ l l Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region: Farm Name: '_— C�I C �✓e w (I V 0!2 j!�U Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: 441_ OnsiteRepresentative: C71r"15 i)v p` Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Design Current Swine Capacity Pop. to Other Other Wean Latitude: Phone: l 10 2-t1 U 0 I L (;- Integrator: Certification Number: Certification Number: Design Current Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Layer � Non -La er I I E Design Current Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Longitude: Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No [/ `NA ❑ NE E3'NA ❑ NE d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) U Yes U No U NA U NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [rN ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? 1 9 Page I of 3 1e��(U Y� 21412015 Continued Facili Number: Z I jDate of Inspection: - Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [—]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): AZ) 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 27No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Ejr No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [r No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [214o ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Aoolication 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑1TE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑'NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 0% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s) 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA J:J'NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE Reouired Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? es No NA NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes Zoo NA the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ N 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: Date of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA B NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 4�i& the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA D<E 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA IE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA IE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA EKE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA / D E ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes �Io ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes NA PNo� ❑ NE Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑34. Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE Reviewer/Inspector Signatut `11Q-19101Zlj IO I k 1/4/10 S Page 3 of 3