19980602 Ver 1_Complete File_19980702

Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
244 West Millbrook Road ¦ Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 ¦ [phone] ¦ Fax [phone]-/
To:Ohc (? e U
Project #:
0 %a
Date: ' 9`1
5: c
Project Name:
File: 333b
WE
1-1
Transmittal
Under Separate Cover:
For your information and files ? By mail
For comment or approval ? By courier
Returned for correction, resubmit ? By express
Approved as noted
No. Copies Document No. Date Description I
Remarks: -rka5

If enclosures are not as listed as above, kindly notify us at once.
By: ? le \-J ; n M C. h
Soil/Site Evaluation 3 `lapping and Physical Analysis ¦ Wetlands Mapping and Mitigation M Em-ironmental \Udit"
Can-Site Waste Treatment Svstems, Evaluation and Design
Specifications ?
Brochures or photos ?
Correspondence ?
As per your request
WITHERS & RAVENEL, Engineering & Surveying, Inc.
111 MacKenan Drive, Cary N. C. 27511.9191469-3340•FAX.•9191467--6008
September 30, 1998
Kevin Martin
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc
244 W. Millbrook Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
RE: Kensington C Regency Phases 1 Thru 4
WRES Project No. 96167
Dear Kevin:
Hamilton E. Withers, P.E.
Samuel F. Ravenel, P.E.
James E. Canfeeld P.E.
Loflee G. Smith, P.E.
Jimmy E. Bass, RLS
Michael E. Dickerson, RL.S
As requested please find attached one copy of the revised wetlands permitting map indicating
revisions required by NCDENR-DWQ. Please note that we have revised the culvert crossing
location and eliminated the lot fill in the upstream side of the drained pond. Also attached is a
reduced copy of this sheet. )U* - W in nett; *'?°@4 ?-• " *'?
veer 1?°?w""JRO ei
r1g 12
e reco
"i" 15e F" iF"Piffl*
are C0111
f
Please review this information and advise me if you require additional information. Thank you
for your continued assistance with this project.
Since ely,
ames E. Canfield, P.E.
cc: Neil Matthews, Community Properties
file
?l t?dY ? o.. Ate A
or., +ce\) ks e&, 4 O ?
J AENG-8 U R\PROJ\96\ 167\093098. k.,. wpd
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
A 4 •
NC ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
October 9, 1998
Wake County
DWQProject # 980602
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS and
Neuse River Buffer Rules
Mr. Neil Matthews
Community Properties
3600 Glenwood Avenue
Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27612
Dear Mr. Matthews:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below,
to place fill material in 0.50 acres of wetlands and 100 feet of stream for the purpose of
constructing a road crossing and lot fill at Kensington at Regency, Phases I-IV, as you described
in your application dated June 30, 1998. After reviewing your application, we have decided that
this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Numbers 3101, 3103 and 3108.
These certifications allow you to use Nationwide Permit Numbers 12, 14 and 26 when the Corps
of Engineers issues them. This approval is also valid for the Neuse River buffer rules (15A
NCAC 213 .033). In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you
go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal
Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will
expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise specified in the
General Certification. This Certification replaces the one issued to you on September 29, 1998.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your
application except as modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you
may be required to send us a new application.. If the property is sold, the new owner must be
given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying
with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre,
compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7).
For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification
and any additional conditions listed below.
1. Conservation easements shall be placed in all lots with remaining jurisdictional wetlands
and waters and on areas within 50 feet of al streams on the property to restrict future
wetland and/or water impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place at the time of
recording of the plat.
2. Wetland and stream fill is allowed for sites "E" and "F" and the road bed only.
3. Wetland fill is not allowed at location "D".
4. The invert of the pipe under the road must not be lower than the elevation of the wetland in
location "D".
5. The forest vegetation within 50 feet of all streams and on the old dam within 50 feet of the
stream shall not be removed unless a variance is granted by the EMC or unless rules are
changed to allow this removal.
6. A 50-foot wide wooded buffer shall be planted adjacent to the stream and stormwater form
adjacent lots shall be directed to sheetflow through the buffer.
Division of Water Quality • Non-Discharge Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
10/07/98 WED 14:30 FAX [phone] Foncille MoriseY Corp. 10002
wrrBERS & RA.YENEL, Engineering & Surveying, Inc. N K.w1affr,P.E
F..RfiVfflz4 PE
'.
I.?I MacKenan Drive, ;Gary N.C. 27SII.919/469-3340•FAX.[phone]? U NUal JaMa r. Crflelef,P.E.
OJlee G sm", P.E
JU"Y E B-, RLS
MuNaet E, Dinknvo,% JUS
September 30,1998
Kevin. Martin
Soil'& Environamental Consultants, Ine
.244 W. Millbrook Road
Ra1Gil;h; NC 27609
RR' Kensington C? Regency Phases i Thru. 4,
WRES Project No. 96167..
DearKevin:
As- requested please find attached one copy of the revised wetlands permitting map indicating
revisions required by NCDENR-DWQ, Please note. that we have revised the culvert crossing
location and eliminated the lot fill in the upstream side of the drained pond.. Also attached is a
reduced copy of this sheet. We are also asking you to notify NCDENR-DWQAhat we will not be
able to comply with Condition #1 'requiring easements to he in place within 30 days of the date of
the 401 Certification. 't'hese easements will be put in place with the recordation of the lots which
will occur after infrastructure improvements are completed.; These easements will t e recorded but
not within the 30 day requirement. We would rather have this condition worded "that at time of
record, plat, conservation, easements shall be placed...."
Please review this information and advise me if you require additional information. Thank you
for yotw continued assistance with this project,
Since ly,
ants E: Caufleld, P.E:
cc: [Veil.. Matthews, Community Properties 00
T? l-b .
JdiaxJt7RVMOns04IMSlole.bq.,gM , . .
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
NC ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 29, 1998
Wake County
DWQProject # 980602
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS and
Neuse River Buffer Rules
Mr. William Gerald Smith
3212 Ten Ten Road
Apex, NC 27502
Dear Mr. Smith:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below,
to place fill material in 0.50 acres of wetlands and 100 feet of stream for the purpose of
constructing a road crossing and lot fill at Kensington at Regency, Phases I-IV, as you described
in your application dated June 30, 1998. After reviewing your application, we have decided that
this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Numbers 3101, 3103 and 3108.
These certifications allow you to use Nationwide Permit Numbers 12, 14 and 26 when the Corps
of Engineers issues them. This approval is also valid for the Neuse River buffer rules (15A
NCAC 2B .033). In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you
go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal
Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will
expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise specified in the
General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your
application except as modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you
may be required to send us a new application.. If the property is sold, the new owner must be
given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying
with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre,
compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7).
For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification
and any additional conditions listed below.
1. Conservation easements shall be placed in all lots with remaining jurisdictional wetlands
and waters and on areas within 50 feet of al streams on the property to restrict future
wetland and/or water impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the
date of this letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later).
2. Wetland and stream fill is allowed for sites "E" and "F" and the road bed only.
3. Wetland fill is not allowed at location "D".
4. The invert of the pipe under the road must not be lower than the elevation of the wetland in
location "D".
5. The forest vegetation within 50 feet of all streams and on the old dam within 50 feet of the
stream shall not be removed unless a variance is granted by the EMC or unless rules are
changed to allow this removal.
6. A 50-foot wide wooded buffer shall be planted adjacent to the stream and stormwater form
adjacent lots shall be directed to sheetflow through the buffer.
7. Stream relocation for the road crossing shown on the application is not allowed. Rather the
stream shall be piped in place under the road bed.
Division of Water Quality • Non-Discharge Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
Alf
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an
adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter.
To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless
you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the
Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
John Dorney
Central Files
Kevin Martin; S & E C
James Canfield; Withers and Ravenel
Sincerely,
o oward, r. P.E.
980602. itr
JldlC UI IVUI U I %aCtl U111 ICI
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
D E N F=?L
Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
FAX:[phone]
FAX TO: '\e?j i \/? I V ? 01 /\I'? r\ I FAX NUMBER:
FROM:
PHONE:
NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET:
40?5 ?r
ojyy?

mom' ,? ??
*wy\
?\w- V ??
vw?- rnavc

III fi F F= -+ man- k?r%
C?Z? 'I i4'.Q IA/hLlP?. lV)QC?'.?L'J 5I7fQw-. ?_.
U II
ih r? (!a' pie -
aA??
L?j L
4e.
?S ,% 11,0 r F?noJct9 sY G?Qm ?I N6 Z
0
?o Cons . ??
s? \/JL + pj '3k
_ 31,483 S. F.
K 29,441 S.F. 80 l = 00 32,626 S.F. CHAN
EXISTING /` - LWET
TREE LINE / 2
e z
,'1eaCTS 27,487 S.F. /Z 9 F /,
e' ?c F.
?? ttttt ?%'
/t ?_ ?/ t t t t
NEW CHANNEL D P
•--
' r
BEGIN CHANNEL ,t• T 24
I M PACT 45' • • : t • Jt 6
?•........ t t .
....t...... \
;i
•••• ••••'
.. vvvvv 23,408 S.F. \
v?loode? r
t•t.R. tttt 77 APPROXIMAT
:: 22.869 S.F. ` TREE LINE
CHANNEL ,j ;;;;••, ::
3 90 S.F 'R
TY. OPOS
?J r ?\ CONCRETE
SIDEWALK \ \ 17
5 6 20.040
26,405 S.F. \ \
5 19,566 S.F. \ \
\ \ 1\FA \ \ 19,734 S.F. \
14 -?
6 0,071 S. F. \ \
24,181 S. F.
(o p ?'\
? 13
\
20,066 S.F. 1;? \ 24
/ 7 / \ \ 21,086 S.F. \
\
21,018 S.F. \ \ 25
12 22,484 S.F.
\ \ F < 19,843 S.F. < \ \
\ \ 26
21,177 S.F.
8 P
19,177 S.F.
\\
0 1 1 \ ? 27
/
19,745 S. F. 20,133 S.F.
? ? O ^ C
10 S.F.
WITHERS & RAVENEL, Engineering & Surveying, Inc.
w 111 MacKenan Drive, Cary N. C. 27511.9191469-3340•FAX:[phone]
WITHERS 8 RAVENEI
September 3, 1998
Pete Coldwell
NCDENR-DWQ
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
RE: Kensington @ Regency
DWQ Project 980602 Wake County
WRES Project No. 96167
Dear Mr. Coldwell:
Hamilton E. Withers, P.E.
Sanael F. Ravenel, P.E.
James E. Canfield, P. E.
Loftee G. Smith, P.E.
Jimmy E. Bass, RLS
Michael E. Dickerson, RLS
I am writing this letter to follow-up our correspondence to Mr. Kevin Martin on September 2, 1998
concerning the above referenced project. At Kevin's request, we also sent you a copy of the letter.
The owners have reviewed this letter and requested that we further address the Kensington Hill Way
alignment with respect to your letter to Mr. Gerald Smith dated August 19, 1998. This letter asked,
"specifically can you construct your road crossing to avoid the forest ve etg ation by realigning the
entrance road". As stated in our previous letter, the existing alignment of Kensington Hill Way has
far less impact on existing forest vegetation than the removal of the existing leaking dam and
placement of a new earthen dam embankment and spillway to meet the Town of Cary design criteria.
This is readily visible on site. If the roadway is realigned downstream, the dam will have to be
replaced to partially recoup the financial loss associated with loss of lots. The refurbished pond
would allow for premiums to be added to all adjacent lot prices.
Also, Kevin requested that we discuss the proposed level spreaders in further detail. We would install
these level spreaders at all storm drainage outlets that discharge within required Neuse River buffer
riparian areas. Our plans currently indicate a riparian buffer along the entire length of this drainage
way. It is our understanding, however, that part of this riparian buffer area is not required due to the
absence of forest vegetation.
We hope that this additional information will assist you in your decisions concerning the 401 Water
Quality Certification for this project. Please advise if you require additional information or have any
questions.
Sincerely,
J es E. Canfield, P.E.
cc: Neil Matthews, Smith Ventures, LLC
Kevin Martin, S & EC
File
1:\ENG-SU RTROA96\ 1 6 710 903 9 8_p-pd
0911111998 16:37

? ,
Fax N t tm l: er (9-1.9) &16-9467 ' ?---
DaUe'
To: Na m e-.
Company: ? Q? -
Time Senn
cc: ?U u?s??ue
9!)
.Fax. Number:
subject: ?P???_ rr! iiY l .(>,
Number of pages including; tra.n:smiWal. sheet-; l
(
] For your (omments/aPl)rOviil. For your information
_
? Per our conversation U Per your request
? Please advise U Please call
? Would like to discos. Please handle
Ma rd Copy Sent
? US regular mail ? Hand delivery
[] UPS overnight [ US certified
? Fedaral Fxpre,s No bard copy sen.t
? nthpr
R(?marks-
if ygla hnve arty questions or problems with. fluff transmission, please co;ntal-t : (?
a k (9-19) 846-5900.
Confidentiality Notice
7hit: tr=znsr+ Nsion is intnmda"I r,nly for thv ase cal the intiividum) rIT' amity to whir..}'t it ir addressed and may contain
informatitn, that is privileged and confOrnlisl. If the reader of th'c; nuwsalw, is nol. tho intended incipient, you are hereby
notil'iod thin oav klisc;lusure, dimnbuti.m or cnpyinR of lhir, inicnmation is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
IrawinIission in orror, please. notify un IIII i r'r lii I -Iyby l,•lufJ eruct oAurn the !Axed docU„„entc to 11?: M t6* .16(3vo
?,,I,,h•,••;., vio tho t)„iiod SLale0 Poslnl 4;ivir0.
9198469467
S R:
PAGE 61
Soil & E1ivironmental Consultants, Inc
2441 %M%-- t N1ilibrooV4 Rnwi ¦ R:lloigh, hnrdi Carolina 27609 ¦ C919) X3.5 1x (919) 8/16-9•{i
ti,rili`;itr l.?;llu;ilr It ¦ 1'1s11?1)in?, anal 1`Ily:;i?i,! nnaly5:i: ¦ ;?%r llancls Mahi)i,W ;Ind Mitif;?tion A f;lttnri??Ini'1?C11
C),r`-•ii?7 ?xhl?:tc• ?I'rc•atnu^nl ?}rstems_ [_v:tlualiC?l, atld I)c°:',ign
09/11/1998 10:37 9198469467 = EC' PAGE 02
Soil a Enviro"I le"ta1 Consultants,q>111e
- 7
2244 West Millbmok Read 8 ltsiI?'If?lt I•dc.juli c trotinn. 276o9 a (919184 ?
TO: John Dorney DWQ
Pete Colwell DWO
FROM' Kevin Martin
DATE: September 11, 1993
RE: Kensington. 401 Certiiicat.iola (1)WQ #980602)
I received your nles ,Edge that ti'"' r tiri7l slirrtiki move the road if he call
rather than cross the old farm tlnntl bell with it, I will relay this to hint.
I gun eorry we are of n different opinion. its to "least dwiiaging
alternatives" for the l?rttject. 1 explained my opinion to Pete on-site ,m d
he explained. his to me. I still feral our originally proposed layout is best
for the following reasons:
1. Proposed road impacts are to a Tct:etltly drained ma-umade fai-m pond
that was drained for safety , tal:ionethei rg.'lif w id lw trecs on the 11 1. kcly rebuild al thef
the road is not placed in thislc?
dain to current specs. under noel - il-cportiug NW3 in order. to recoup
losses (via. Water front lot preni ct I us) that will occur due to voU.r
proposed road alignment, Therefore, the. impact area we are being
asked to avoid will return to a. pouid, which will have some water
quality benefits bui: according to Pete they won't be as good as current
conditions. Rebuilding the (1fan to current regPirements will also
remove more trecs than nec:esso y if the pond were not rebuilt.
Contrary to the 5tatcnient in your letter, moving the road will not
reduce the amount of forest vew-1 atio n :impacted by the overall
Project.
¦ w.-timids Ivi.tppin.g ttnd Mitigntirm ¦ En?ftronlx1Pnt 1 Attu
"C' ph ,irnl An?l.ySis n
soil/SiteF,vca)uatir?n ¦ Mapping Y
.r' i.'fct;).U71?`.tll .`_iy;,lk;iil>, liv.thtintiot? a.rtct T`???si
(7T1-S1tP W:itil .
MEMORANDUM
09/11/1998 10:37 9198469467 8,. Et_ PAGE 03
2. Until the proposed devPlnlr?r?etit. t:k?e si1x? wris at1 active cow pasture.
Our plcin included vnlunt`yz?l1 : t'e??nt of Ole pond were 110 esuch taulfcr-1.
riparian stream htiafter do
currently exist% or is required. Moving the roRCl Will reC1UC.e Icilrcl
fragment the buffer that could be est?ibli slwd and the requirei•?.lcnt of
moving the road gives the clic rt[ no incentive to establish such a
buffer. In fact, it will likely become a. fertilized fescue lawn insteo4.
3. The road structure could be utilized Et part. of a wctlcmd storlnwater
treatment system if plaCE'.(i as prol.)()S l by ottz' client. This waitld
involve eliminating wetland ltti ac, L7 '11-I'd log; i of. one. lot. This was
discussed on-site with Pc'-tr. Litt 11(7 wo"16 rte t s 'V if this was 1]7
acceptable alternative or rich. Mi:ied on your r_.Qll T sssume it is not.
By the way iminc.cliat:cly downstreoti, of this project. is a. storm water
pond that was sized to trcat the entire wate.rRhe d.
it-Ig of your concerns is that becc?ti.se some minnows were
My understand
found dowastrcain of and withic, air old drained pond bed, this is a
"significant" stream and imparts shoiild be minimized by placing the
road further downgtrer?m. I and vary concerned that this matter has
taken much longer to resolve th.ttt it sl:tould have bev. i sc we. were ziut
initictlty told tbgt you were molting si. site visit: so tho-t we could be present
and discus" the project on-•sit.c. Toni olso c.wriotus WAY tills "l?rol:?lc~?ii"
came up since the Corps diet tiot: have a problem with the luo'jcct and
your regional office hadn't plattn.ed to vi sit the site b?tsecl 011 a plan
review in the office. I a ii even more (-(Mier~rntxI that whet'. I pmsctited two
alternatives on-site to Fete (his aricl our propo clcpl d) aon disc .ss stn y
opinion of the pros and cons of each trt detail
tell me which was the "best"
To summarize my reasoning tlt:tt our altcrnotive plan is least datlta-ging
as compared to yours the folluwing gable: is presented.
Our Plan DWQ
Neuse 13uffer Preserved
Wetl.a.nd within Pond
Preserved (if inrpcac:t D
omitted) ,
New Riparia" l-3uffer
created
772 ;1CM.3 (-.1500 linear tt)
n0')6 ftz
0,92 scree (Aoo lir?car ft)

1.67 acres
1450ft.
D
0
U.i0 acres
Open Watcr Fartx?. 11031" 0
rzestorcd
09/11/1998 10:37 9198469467 EC: PAGE 04
Bottom Line: our plan results in more created buffers, as much or
more preserved buffers, and more. preserved wetlands. So it seems
that to DWQ, beeping an old farut pond is preferable to creating
buffers and preserving wetlands.
I assume all of the above was relOtc(I to YOU 1)y Pete; Mid was considered
in your decision, but 11 ye7l_l. woluicl like' to discuss this further please ca11._
Cc: Danny Smith DWQ
Steve ROI)erts S N. E
Well Matthews Community Properties
Jim Canfield Withcrs & Raveriel
SEP-02-1998 16:01 FROM WITHERS RNUDIEL TO 7339959 P.02
.` WIMERS & RAVENEL, Engineering & Surpeying, life. HuAJilrCn rt?triren,?E
?. .111 MacKenan Driyc, Cary N.C. 27511.9191469-3340•.,,4X:91914157- ra„ tp Rmener, rc•.
600$ catfwl t PE
CR0 6 RA r oflte 6- 3)Wih, AF,
Michatl E, Diaketson,.RLs
Sopteitibcc 271.98 ??e? (rq vl
Mr. Kevid.Martin I rP' Av?s
Soil & Environ=ntal Consultants, Inc:
244 West Mwitbrook Road 1?? _? NnOy
Raleigh, NC 27609,
aV0.(
RE: Kensington @7a R.eg©ncy
WRE,S Project No_ 961,67
DearKevin: •
VVc.arc writirig diis ictter, at your request, In response to the letter addressed to. Mr. Gerald Smith from John Dornev
elated Auquet 19, 1999 ,and subsequent discussions you have had with' representatives of NCDENR. The proposed
Kensing ton Mill Way access 6intto Penny Rwid was located with consideration of the following in.killnatiun:
1. Town of Cary and NCDQT policies require adequate separation between .access points along major
thoroughfares- . bis separation allows for exclusivc left turn lanes to be constructed and also assists with traffic
progression if these intL-rsectiuns are signalized In the future, 'the.705' separation front tderlee Drive to
Kensirkztoii.Hill vray provides jugs enottrh distance for the urquired exclusive left turn lane at tlils entrance
while tnaintaiuingthe existing left turti lane, onto Fried". I,hive, This exclusive Jett tuYrl lane uito Kensington
is required by.NCDOT.
'2_ The reali merit of Kensington Hill WAX ntld he accom fished 'ust within Town oft?ary nrniirnum design
oniteriato allgw for this roadway to cruss the storlnvywer'channel dowd,stmam ofthe'pon ca igmneut'will
cause. o loss of one or two lots, ndversely impacting the project. If this is required; the dcve.kr eF will repair the.
existing dam, ?vhicfi'is lesknlt;, and. install a proper snilhvay devicr. as required by the To:vn of very • t is our
opinion t a this work would cause greater disturbance of the wetland' areas and nearby vegetation than by:
constructing the roadwly as planned.
3. The culvert under the zondw6y has been located in a manner that iviil greatly improve its hydtauHc performance
rattier than locating the culvert so that it worild create a severe angle for the wator ontoring the culvclt fi-onl
the drainage way. Phis angle of entry would require much riiore reinforcement to prevent future erosion.
We 61so propose using' a level spreader desiarted and constructed in accbrdance with NCDENR land Quality
regtiirclnents to suet( flow stonnwaier discharge across the riparian buffer zone.
I mist that thl's infi mlation will r1R9ist you in providini? NC T)UN t with infornrntion reciniwcl fin (ficul (0 ismic Me 4())
Water Quality. Certification for this 'Project. 1?least, ;advise if y??u r?r]tlite additional i?tfi?T;r,ation or have any questions.
5' icerely,
FOR
Jaines E. Canfleld, 'P. B.
cc: Neil Matthew s,. Smith Ventures, t,LC
Vf1te Coldwcll,'NCDFNR-DW(
(_6k) ?04/

, -
e,?
furl-1L P. 02
f 1? ?
` SEP-02-1998 16:00 FROM WITHERS & RAVENEL TO
WITHERS & RAVEN-L, Engineering & Surveying, Inc.
111 MacKenan Drive, Cary N. C. 27511.9,19/469-3340.1%AX: 919/467 6008
FAX TRANSMITTAL
TO: E kp4?9 -DUO
FROM: -,&ZM-DI
JOB
7339959 P.01
Ifainabir E. Mat", P.E.
Samael R &verel, AK
-14mts E. CW01d, P.Z.
L,q#Ls O. Smah, P's,
Amp" E. low. RCS
Muhael H. Dickerson, .?4X S
DATE: ?Mg Z, =
# of Sheets: Z _
(including cover sheet)
FAX #: .q3q_-
PROJECT NAI M K g;y5lA.JGt ?tl BUG)/ __
ORIGINAL, TO FOLLOW BY MAIL: .X,.. YES NO

ADJ 7-M(i 77X4- 7A K YOU WE

1F FAX IS INCOMPLETE, OR IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE
FAX, PLEASE CALL [phone].
SEP-08-1998 09:30 FROM WITHERS :': 1; 1t 1FJ 11 L TO
WITHERS & RAVENEL", mg.ineering & Surveying, Mc.
I:i1 VaMeridn Drive, (;aq N.C. 27511. •9.19/469-3340•FAX:91914d76
®R -,L =j
. F? A
epteniber 3; 1998
Pete Coldwell
1~1CD R-DWQ
4401 Re6ay Creek Road
Raleigh,,NC 27626=0535
RE. : K.cnsington @ Regency
7339959 P.n2
008
llsa?ilinn G I?ilhen, P.&
Sd#wrl F. Ravepk, P.E.
jamn 8 cmtfigg P.F..
Lofte, C. $?nkh,.A&
JIMWP- Ba..,RCS
Michael F. Dfckmoyr,.RLS
DWQ Projcct 980602 Wake Counl.y
VIES Projcct No.. 96167
Dear Mr. Coldwells .
1 am wr ting,this letter to follow-up our corrsspohdencr. to lv1r. Kevin Martin'n September 2, 1:998
concernixtg the above referenced project. At Kevin's request, we nlso sent you a copy of the letter.
The owners have reviewed this letter sind requeste-d that we. fiirt her address the Kenain ton Hill Way
alignment wiih.respeet to your letter to Mr. Ger:ild Smith dtited August 19 1998. This letter asked.
"specifically' ca:n you construct your road cro,;s ink?, to avoid thv; fad vE?c t>?ioz by realigning the
entraWo road'.'. As stated in our'previcm4 letter, the exi-0iuig alignment of Kensington Hill Way bas
tar less :impact on existing forest vegetation than the removal of the existing le,"g dam.and
placement of anew earthen darn embankment. and spillway to meet the Town of Cary.design criteria.
This is..eeadily visible can site. Tf the roadway is realigned downstreatn the dam will have to be
replaced to: partially „r&oup the financial loss associated with loss ,of lots. The refurbished pond
would allow for premiums to be added to all adjacent lot lirices.
Also, Kevin requested that we discuss the proposed level spreaders in further detail. We would in.?all
these level spreadeis:at all.stonn, drainage outlets that discharge within required Neuse: River buffer
ripanah:areas. Our plans currently indicate a riparian buffer along; the e0iire length of this drainage.
way. It is our understanding, However, that part of (his rilsariL'tn buffer area. is not required due to the
absence of forest vegetation.
we hope that tNs- additional information will assist you in your decisions conceniing.the 401 Water
Quality Cert&9ion for this project: Picase advise if you require. additioiWi6rmation or have any .
gdestions . .
Sincerely,
i s E. C:anfieldI P.E. .
cc: NeU Matthews, Smith Ventures, 7.:1,4
Kevin.Martiti, S & EC
File .
r. tcr?c.m;evxoroFU pvrn6?98,vc.Nrd
1011ll_ F.02
SEP-08-1998 09:29 FROM W I THF_RS R-11 .IR El_ 11:"I 7339959 P.01
NaowdVon t. Withers, P.E.
_ Nampo) A Rnren*4 AE.
James E. uhG. s , RE
W THERS & RAVEY AW ,, Engineering & .Surveying, Yn.c. Jbfy E. a", Y
111 MacKenan Dtive, CaryN. C. 27511.9191469-3340-T'A X. 9I9/4ti7-60118 `Ni`hn*I K Dicbnox, AU
ri AX TRANSMITTAL 01 9141
TO: .I.rGQic/e ---
FROM: a f `
DATE-.-
# of Sheets: ?2-
(Including cover sheet)
JOB #. _ FAX # : --
PROD CT NAME:
ORIGINAL TO FOLLOW BY MAIL: _ YES NO

IF FAX 'IS INCOMPLETE,, OR W, YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING TlvW
FAX, .PLEASE GALL [phone].
I
N,le SWAY camak
aAW
rAal\,,
pe\? morA1

ntiu ??6
At.? "Ja4-
tO -?- 20-2 • Zk
??- 1%(
?aX
(A)a
4L-
05?P
eld?rm.
?M? ??l do-luso-

?`?e_ NN,O- - c:gF, ",
v a,x_e A 023?

(?- "? X
3 - iOoL4 Or l0,-J- 5-
od- d/ o, = s 7p-.a?` aA?
X09/11/1998 10:35 9198469467 S &. EC; PAGE 01
r'' c.-.••.:,,..:. .. n,rrwf,r, rFirii,BFrMfrmY.
Soil & Environmental Consultants, In(
2,4111 %A?.st Millbrook R.ow1 ¦ RaleiglI, North C.-trolim 27{)09 ¦ [phone] M Pax (919) 846-(M
l;ac si vile Sheet
] it\' h111n11)Ci' (`) 19) F,46-9467
Date' q.? 1 i l 194( --
To: Name:
Company,
-----
Fax Number:
Tine Sent:
Cc* 1 (r 1
97
From: K li r? m!-"?[.- ?1------ - - `;uhjt>rt_??,? c) _ -
Number of pages including transmit:Lil sheet- ( ^
[} For your comments/apmoval. For your information
? Per our couversation Per your request
? Please advise Please call
Would like to discuss Please handle
HA rd Copy Sent:
? US regular mail Hand delive[)r
? UPS Overnight U US certified
E] Federal Rxpress L] No hard copy sent
? C7ther
Remarks:
If yot, have any questioti.s or problems with the transmission, please contact-
a t [phone].
Confidentiality Notice
This truiil;n?i uic)n ir: inlondod only for the imo of tit,, individual or onlity In which it i4 adritim- d r4nd may ronlain
inli.irnuitiull that is privilePed 9nA <:onfid,yntial. If the readerrif Ihir, moss„go is nr,l thr intondod rrcipienl, you are hereby
nutiI icd Iltat Oily Jisclowr(*, distribution or copy inr, of this infnrmatir+n irr strickly prohibited. If yott hAvo rer.0.ivad this
lronsmissiun in orror, please notify us iritrt odintraly by telq)hon(? rind rol,urn t1w faxed documents to us tit the 4ibov(:u•.hlro 7? vi.i tl-iv United Stutca Po iAnI !-_,rvir-o.
tiinli`it, I ?:t!iiali ilr ¦ R1:1pping :it,d 111iy.sicol Anal)'si", ¦ \?/ctl;t,icls Mal>I7infl ;m(I Mitigation ¦ FT1Vll0I)ltt0l1t:tl
tai, 'itr ??:ast< "I ri. atnv nl S},,itr•nt ;, f?v;lllI'll ion :Intl 1)t'.':iti!rt
i 0,3/11/1998 10: 35 9198469467 & Er ; PAGE 02
Soil && Enviroltx>tnerital. Consultants, Inc.
244 \Vest Millbrccl( Road ¦ R;ilripl I, North C;aroiitiri 2/609 ¦ [phone] • Fax (o).!)) M69,167
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney 1)W(-.)
Pete Colwell TWO
FROM: Kevin Martin
DATE: September 11, 1.998
RD: Kensington 401 Certif'ica.tiori. (DWQ #980002)
1 received your message, that the client should move the road if he cnn
rather than cross the old firrri pond bed witli it. I will relay this to hini.
I am sorry we are of a. riiffereW opir?inn as to "lv st damaging
alternatives" for the proje(J. I exp4dried nly opinion to Pete on-site and
he explained his to me. I still feel our originally proposed layout is best
for the following reasons:
1. Proposed road impacts are to a, recently drained manmade farm pond
that was drained for sa_R-ty reasons (leakage and trees on the dam). It
the road is not placed iii this location the client will likely rebuild the
dam to current specs. under iron. - reporting N W 3 in order to recoup
losses (via. water tiront lot premiui is) thti.t will occur clue to your
proposed road alignment. Therefore, the impact: arc i, we are being
asked to avoid will return to ?.t porid, which will brave some water
quality benefits lint ar.:c:ordiiig to Pc lx, they zvi?ra't be a.s good as current
conditions. Rebuilding thc tl im to t;i.irrent requirements will also
remove more. trees thin nccr.:is ry if the pond were not rebuilt.
Contrary to the q a .cincnt in yoi r tenter, ?itoving the rood will not
reduce the amount of forefit vege.tatirn? impoct:ed by the overall
project.
5ni1/Site E`alunLlot1 ¦ Mappir?t; anti Pllysic.il 0<11ysis ¦ \vell:an(ls MO.Pping and Miti9111011 ¦ Y:rivironweiltal Midit
c?rj-Site Waste 't'rcatrr? ut. `>ys?ruis, EvAU Jtion and Desigt?
09/11/1998 10:35 9198469467 S & EC PAGE 03
2. Until the propo-,ed clPVFlnpn-trrnt, the site was an active cotiy pasture.
Our plan inclilded voluntarily recsual lishing over 800 feet of wooded
riparian stream buffer dowiistreari1 of t:ltc pond were Tio such buffet'
currently exists or is required, Moving; the road will. reduce and
fragment the buffer that cook] he established and the requirement of
moving the road gives the client nca incentive to establish such a
buffer. In fact, it will likely become a fertilized fescue lawn instead..
3. The road structure could be utilized as pant of a wetland stormwa-ter
treatment system if' placed is proposed by our client. This would
involve eliminating wetland inil)sic:t D and loss of oite 1ut.. This was
discussed, on-site with Pete but be would ttoL 50.y if this wa.s an
acceptable alternative or noL. E ascd on your call I assume it is not.
By the way inintediaLely dowrtsUcri_t?t of this project is a storm. wnter
pond that was sized to treat the entire watershed.
My understanding of your conc_erItc; is th. t because some minnows were
found downstream of o rid within ct ti old drained pon(l hed, this is a
"significant." stream and imp clts sbo] Ild ho ruinitnizFd by placing the
road further downstream. 'I :am very crmcorned that this rnat:tcr has
taken nt.uch longer to rr`.solvr ihsitt it should have because wry were not:
i,-,.itially told that yoi.t werc r.n +ltirtp, ;i sitr visit so that we could be prescnt
and discuss the projec=t on-site... 1 om crltio curious why this "problem."'
carne up since the Corps diet. not hove si. problem with the prp ' ject atad
your regional office Had=n't planned. let visit. the sitc, based on a- plod
review in the office. J ant. even trtore_• concerned that when l presented two
alternatives on-site to Pete (his rend. our proposed Platt) mid discussed my
opinion of the pros and cons of r ac"li in dct.ail he. could not (or would not,)
tell me which was the "best".
To sun-nna-'rize my rea.sonitil; tlint: oa-tr ?qltcrn<ttive plan is least dasta..t_gnIg
as compared to yours the followint; WI-tlr. is ltrr scnLcd.
-- Our Alan DWQ
- - - - Alternative
Neuse Buffer Preserved 1,72 .tr:tc s (-•1. 500 liurar ft) 1,67 wres
[ 1-45pft)
Wetland within Pond -- 0026 UP
Prr.wi-vcd (if iiapac:t: D
omitted)
Ncw Riparian Duffcr 0.0"? ncl.- n (800 littoor ft)
Created
0
0
Open Water Fran. Pot-A rl W30 :acres
Restored
0-
X7911111998 10:35 9198469467 S & EC PAGE 84
Bottom Line: our plan results in snore created buffers, as much or
more preserved buffers, and more preserved wetlands. So it seems
that to DWQ, keeping an old farne pond is preferable to creating
buffers and preserving wetlands.
I assume all of the above, was relatcd to you by Pete wind was considered
in your decision, but it' you would like to discuss this further please call.
Cc: Danny Smith DWQ
Steve Roberts 3 & EC
Neil Matthew:, Cou nlunity Propc-.rtics
Jini Canfield Withcrs &; R veiiel
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
1 ? •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
August 19, 1998
DWQ Project # 980602
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr.William Gerald Smith
3212 Ten Ten Road
Apex, NC 27502
Dear Mr. Smith:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your plans for the discharge of fill material into 0.7 acres of streams
and/or wetlands located at Kensington at Remington subdivision in Wake County for residential development.
Insufficient evidence is present in our files to conclude that your project must be built as planned in waters and/or
wetlands in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506. Therefore, unless modifications of the proposal are made as
described below, we will have to move toward denial of your 401 Certification as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0507(e)
and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information. Until we receive
additional information, we are requesting (by copy of this letter) that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers place your
project on administrative hold.
Please provide us with information supporting your position that states your project must be constructed as
planned and that you have no practicable alternative to placing fill in these waters and/or wetlands. Specifically can you
construct your road crossing to avoid the forest vegetation by realigning the entrance road to swing east of the end of the
buffer and then intersect with Devonhall Lane? This alignment would also minimize stream impacts. Also please
address how stormwater will be directed to sheetflow across the buffer zone. Any documentation such as maps and
narrative that you can supply to address alternative designs for your project may be helpful in our review of your 401
Certification. Also this project will require compensatory mitigation as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h). Your
mitigation proposal is insufficient because none was proposed for the net loss of perennial stream.
Please respond within two weeks of the date of this letter by sending a copy of this information to me and one
copy to Mr. Danny Smith Raleigh Regional Office at 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh NC 27609. If we do not hear from
you in two weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as
withdrawn. I can be reached at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions.
S' er
Jo R. Domey
Wier Quality Certification rogram
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Wilmington Office Corps of Engineers
Central Files
John Domey
Raleigh Field Office Corps of Engineers
980602.nty
Division of Water Quality • Non-Discharge Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 • Telephone [phone] • FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
Division of "Water ouafity
MEMO From: a Date:
To: Subject: LI X5166` 6V rLc
4W0 9??U z 9?Gyj
5?e Ice Li, ,"?L /?a 4oy, ejo ?4ese a/'e ae-4*'
re Go vm o, eHCIQ 4,?I'l S'
9g602? e vti?se
L,-r) G o,,?? 6r'h a Z ((es //c' ae r
1666 fviw? ?o?a4?aSe
c?
Pose bas%? avO a?
?_--L 2 ? fe r fo
S4f-a k, - 44'e y w,e to ca le ?? e G^ acam
`laM0 f,?/ac s
`3?lid c;?r??'ss o fQ ? ?f;a? l s f?Pa ? .??,-f, ? fd??
P
r55rqes
J 108 R
A??v'psS AUO%?aace aT
5)
?Cnow???,?e `rP?s?'ac^c,'?r?1? ?r d f (,tiff??- -f ?ij?'c?
6) 46
Pa f oe-,e a v ea,
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
PO Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 / Phone: [phone]
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: /% Go%'/j
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: , ,Opwle y
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name William Smith County Wake
Project Number 98 0681 County2
Recvd From APP Region Raleigh
Received Date 7/23/98 Recvd By Region
Project Type residential
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
12 HWF O Y O N 127-43-4.5 WSIII NSW 030402 0.71
14 HWF VY ON F-27-43-4.5 WSIII NSW 030402
2,6 HWF OO Y _0N F---27-43-4.5 WSIII NSW 030402 r- F
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet

Is Mitigation required? O Y ON
Did you request more info? O Y ON
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y ON
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? O Y O N
MT. ts: /I Recommendation: endation: Issue O Issue/Cond ?O Deny
nips, U vi?Qr.- /',e?nsYvrilGTlOvt, Parr of wP7lulira/ i??rQGG? 1'5 - GIievc-too
.4 _e
E14-15-
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
TRIAGE CHECKLIST
"arm
Project Name. W
Project Number: ?D
County: W A'"
The attached project has been sent to you for review for the following reasons. Please consider whether a
site visit is needed to determine the impacts. Particular attention should focus on the below checked items.
Please feel free to call the central office staff member assigned to your region if you nerd assistance.
Stream length impacted.
- Stream determination (Le. intermittent or perennial, or any channel preset).
- Wetland impact and distance to blue-line surface waters on USGS tooo map.
Nimimization/avoidance options.
NW 14. Cs access to highground or wetlands)?
Neuse buffer rules.
Pond (water) fill (i.e. is the pond drained or holding water)?
Pond creation (I.e. in uplands, in a drained channel, or in wetlands). Please locate streams and
channels (if any) so that the central office can determine.
Midsation ratios.
Stormwater pond placed in wetlands.
- Ditchina in wetlands.
Is the applicant's proposed stream/wedand midgation site available and viable?
Applicant/consultant has a history of non-compliance (check drawings and application for
accuracy).
Has project been split from previous work to avoid mitigation requirements?
Consistent with pre-application meetings?
Cumulative impact concerns.
OTHER:
DWQ ID: 98068, Corps Action 1D:
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #): 12,14 and 26
Pre--Construction Notification Application
For Nationwide Permits that Require:
1) Notification to the Corps of Engineers
2) Application for Section 401 Certification
3) Coordination with the NC Division of Coastal Management
Send the original and (1) copy of this completed form to the appropriate field office of
the Corps of Engineers (see agency addresses sheet). Seven (7) copies should be sent to
the NC Division of Environmental Management (see agency addresses sheet). PLEASE
PRINT.
1. Owner's Name: William Gerald Smith
2. Mailing Address: 3212 Ten Ten Rd.
Subdivision Name:
City: Apex
State: NC Zip Code: 27502
Project location address, including subdivision name (if different from mailing address
above): The project area will be referred to as Kensington @ RegencV and is located
adjacent to the south side of Penny Rd. approximately 0.75 miles east of the SR 1010
(Ten Ten Rd.) /SR 1379 (Penny Rd.) intersection (see Site Vicinity Map).
3) Telephone Number (Home): (Work): 919 362 6573
4) If applicable, agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone
number.
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Phone: [phone]
244 W. Millbrook Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
5. Location of work (provide a map, preferable a copy of USGS topographic map or
aerial phdtograph with scale):
County: Wake
Nearest town or city: Apex
Z0'd 00:20 86611011Z0 AAnIHlnMIN uaralH>I UrIA-1
Specific Location (include road numbers, landmarks, ebc.): The project area is
located adjacent to the south side of Penny Rd. approximately 0.75 miles east of
the SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd.)/SR 1379 (Penny Rd.) intersection (see Site Vicinity
Ma
6. Impacted or nearest stream/river: Unnamed tributary of Dutchman Branch
River Basin: Neuse
7a• Is project located near water classified as trout, tidal saltwater (SA), high quality
waters (HQW), outstanding resource waters (ORW), water supply (WS-I or WS-
II)? YES ? NO ® If yes, explain:
7b. If the project is located within a Nofth Carolina division of coastal management
area of environmental concern (AEC)? YES ? NO 2
7c, If the project is located within a coastal county (see page 7 for list of coastal
counties), what is the land use plan (LUP) designation? NA
8a. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property?
YES ? NO ED If yes, provide Action TD number of pervious permit and any
additional information (including photocopy of 401 certification).
8b. Are additional permit requests expected for this property in the future?
YES (E] ) NO ( JZ ) If yes, describe anticipated work:
9a. Estimated total number of acre6 in tract of land: 58.6
9b. Estimated total number or acres of wetlands locateed on project sibe:1.5
10a. Number of acres of wetlands impacted by the proposed project by:
Filling: 0.695
Flooding:
Drainage-
CA'd
bb:JA AAAI'AS'2A
Excavation: 0.011
Other.
Total acres to be impacted: 0.706
nanidnnnaa HRI31HN WONA
10b. (1) Stream channel to be impacted by the proposed project (if relocated,
provide distance both before and after relocation):
Length before: 385ft
After: 31Oft
Width Before (based on normal high water contours): 3ft
Width After: NAft
Average depth before: 0.25ft
After: NAft
(2) Stream channel impacts will result from. (check all that apply)
Open channel relocation: Q Placement of pipe in channel: IR
Channel Excavation: Q Construction of a Dam/Flooding:
Other:
11,. If construction of a pond is proposed, what is the size of the watershed draining to
the pond? NA
What is the expected pond surface area? NA
12. Description of proposed work including discussion of type of mechanical
equipment to be used (attach plans 81/2" x 11" drawings only):
Construction of a residential subdivision using conventional methods and
equipment.
13. Purpose of proposed work To provide desired housing near the town of Apex,
NC.
14. State reasons why it is believed that this activity must be carried out in wetlands
(include any measures taken to minimize wetland impacts): In order to utilize the
propex tY effectively as a residential subdivision, wetlands and channels must be
impacted. Minimization measures include: elimination of unessential impacts and
the establishment of a vegetated buffer in a riparian area where forest vegetation
currently'does not exist.
00'd 90:20 8661'01'2.0 AdoiulnUd H@131Ub WON.d
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) (see agency addresses sheet) regarding
the presence of any federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or
threatened species or critical habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the
proposed project_ Date contacted: (attach responses from these agencies).
Handled by USACE
16. You are required to contact the state historic preservation officer (SHPO) (see
agency address sheet) regarding the presence of historic properties in the permit
area which may be affected by the proposed project. Date contacted:
Handled by USACE
17. Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public
(state) land?
YES ? NO ® If no, go to 18.
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document
pursuant to the requirements of the North Carolina Environmental Policy
Act?
YES ? NO ?
b. If yes, has the document been reviewed through the North Carolina
Department of Administration Stat Clearinghouse?
YES ? NO ?
If answers-to 17b is YES, then submit appropriate documentation from the state
clearinghouse to division of environmental management regarding compliance
with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
Questions regarding the State Clearinghouse review process should be directed to
Ms. Chrys Baggett; Director State Clearinghouse, North Carolina Department of
Administration, 116 West Jones Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-8003,
telephone [phone].
18. The following items should be included with this application if proposed activity
involves the discharge of excavated or fill material into wetlands:
a. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, lakes and ponds on
the property (for Nationwide Permit numbers 14,18, 21, 26, 29 and 38). All
streams (intermittent and permanent) on the property must be shown on the
ca 1.4 Cb:IR RFfI10I1l9 nacidins38 H0I31UN W08J
map. Map scales should 6c 1 inch equals 50 feet or 1 inch equals 100 feet or
their equivalent-
b. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant
to the placement of the delineation line.
d. Attach a copy of the storm water management plan, if required.
e. What is land used of surrounding property? Residential Commercial
f. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? Sanitary Sewer
g. Signed and dated agent authorization letter, if applicable.
NOTE: Wetlands or Waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to:
1_ Issuance of a Section 404 Corps of Engineers Permit,
2. Either the issuance or waiver of a 401 Division of Environmental
Management (Water Quality) certification, and
3. (in the twenty coastal counties only) A letter from the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management stating tho proposed activity is consistent
with the North Carolina Coastal Management program-
Owner's/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature valid only if
Agent Authorization Letter from
the owner is provided (18 g.))
991 *A Cb: )A RAA11R1 •za r%801HInS38 HS13188 woad
Site Vicinity Map
For the.
Penny Road Project
Apex quadrangle (USGS 7.5 minute series)
Scale =1;2000
u'

.rr -IJ4
- r
l A'A
9b:L0 866i'0I'L0
:.,,,:.
a,
a?
1 !?

!f((((
A80idln938 H9I31UN W08J

_, ?!?1
Fable 1. Impact summary arranged according to impact-
Impact Type R2 W L CH Lin. Ft. Permit
Lin. FT. Ma'or Minor
A CH 485 20 12
B WL 1227 26
C WL 12569 160 385 14
D W L 9026 26
E W L 5276 26.
_
F WL 2188 26
Project Totals 30,771 160 20
Note: Channel impacts requested under Nationwide Permit 14 have not been counted toward the
project total.
Table 2. Impact summary arranged according to permit.
Permit Wetland Channel
Major Minor
12 485 20 ft.
14 12569
26 17717
Note: Channel impacts requested under Nationwide Permit 14 have not been counted toward the
project total.
80'd Lb:LO 866T'OT'L0 e%801U1n93S H0I31UN W08A
i '
I
t' I' f j?t
Q ?
y. 1
I ,
' e p$
EEt
TZ lit
i
r
60'd

1'
1 ? J

? 1 F
11 /
r
11
; ???_
X
\
1
1
' 1'1 1
~
' ? Ja 17 a r ? •'

9A fl? ? n ti ? ?
d
e e
c

? ?
O ?? ODO b ® =E
a
a
0.
v?
A
x
a
it
.3- /
p 9
`; 111 VA //(/ \1\ ,n?. 1t{? `4.; (?! '2.w I( m???,^pi II ? I II - \J
?.. ?? . W f: 1 fib ;E\
ramiL_3?^J
tat

e.s ?a ? r
V
r ,1
r-?
q? i

(58oibinO38 HS 131U8 WOSA
z
W
Q'.
x
z
x
_ r ,pia ? ?E 1 ° 11 Y1? I
r- -7 V -1
t y ?1 t 1 "'d I l.- _-J
iIARM6 LIPL
y M.a?. 1i 11. 1/ ^ ? Nw ? . ? I Nj ? ' I llY I
\sl' ?? ? a I
z
?\-~ly 7 £•.i I I ???`t ?? ?/N^? ?ti,`? ,? ?'A I I rid I ?
I I
n / r? J // na \ L ^1 J? 1F
\ I?ka
1
1
I 1 ,
Lb:LO 8661'01'2.0
V" •%C+•!-_ `\ TRIANGLE " 22,443 S.F.
1 ` r 21
22
24,014 S. F.
23 20,144 S.F. rl F-
\ \ NOW C
21,88, s.F. WIND'
6 qF 20 HOMEOWNERS
2t,pSB S. NJ,295 S.F. MB 1G
ZONED R_q
SYNC
AVE. LOT
64
I
34 20.617 S-F. t
q ,
?
,31 20 164 S F LPHASE, fig
,..
1 18,242 S.F.1 StD VYALK? t, (stn -iv---
P.)--?
\ \ ,, : 1 63
1 32 /? `--- 20,654 S.F.
\4\ 25,462 S.F.1
31 c \ 183 2 S.F.
\ 26.046 S.F. +
! C I
S.F. I JOHN &
v
\ \ -.? z
WAKE
36 ? 0761
' ZONED
H/dls 20,743 FUTURE PHP
P lK su
L20.494 S.F.
ti \ \ 26,107 S.F.
V.I I 19,387 S.F. 2,118 5.F. \
4 PROP 5.
k I CCNCR 60
;V
25,915 S.F.
N
AA v
7
59 ~ ?. WETLANDS
\ 36,037 5,F,
56 5 57 5? \' A
i.F. 21.056 S.F. 19,434 S.F. ' 24.612 S.F.
i
-J L
KENSINGTON @ REGENCY
n T_T A Cl Ul 0 T TV
0T'd L0:20 8661'0T'20 ANciui1938 H0131UN W08J
50' BUILDING
SETBACK FROM
PENNY ROAD \

10
K'=40'
31
-- ?'
2914-41 S. F. v
EXISTING
TREE UNE ?z
27,4197 S.F.
NEW CHANNEL
BEGIN CHANNEL
IMPACT

CHANNEL

? S1
.? 31,483 5,
'
80 •
32,626 S.F. CH?N -`

9
ITT F.
•.•r• /
vV.
EN f? C -
r'
MPACT r' •"

` 23,408 5,F. \
•
1 1
' 7' APPROXIMA
'?• V 869 S
22 , TREE LINE
F
, .
.

)N
\MILY) " F L [J '? l
f
3 90 S.F Ty -f tOPOS
?- O• ` ' ` CONCRETE
'n ink \ r' SIOEWALK'
2
5 16
26,405 S.F'. 15 10,566 S.F.
{ \ ` 19.73 S.F. \ \
\ }A ?' 14
6 0.071 s.F. \
24,181 ST,
ro
13
20,066 S.F. 2z
21,066
E„ / 2.5
Ii'I 8b:10 8661*01'L0 A801tlln93d H0I31U?J W08J
PRE-DISCHARGE NOTIFICATION PCN
TO: National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island, NC Fax [phone]
US Fish & wildlife Service
Raleigh, NC FAX [phone]
State Historic Presezvation Office
Raleigh, NC FAX [phone]E53
NC Division of Water Quality
Raleigh, NC FAX [phone]
NC Wildlife Remources Commission
Creedrr:aor, NC FAX (919) sae-9939
1. ACTION 7D: 199820101/19982.037/199821038
2. APPLICANT: William Gerald Smith
3. DATE OF TRANSMITTAL: 7/13/98
30c t4 #
4. RESPONSE DEADLINE(5 days from transmittal): 7/17/98
5. COMMENT DEADLINE(10 days from response deadline): 7/27/98
6. SEND COMMENTS TO: RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
RALEIGH, NC
ATTN: Todd Tugwell
FAX [phone]
we are also forwarding the attached PCN to the Fish and Wildlife
Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service for review and
comment concerning any likely affect to any threatened or
endangered species or their critical habitat within those
agencies` jurisdiction.
101d VP:Z0 8661'01'G0 nNOiuin93N HSI31UN F
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Kensington @ Reg ency Phases I-IV County Wake
Project Number 98 0602 County2
Recvd From APP Region Raleigh
Received Date 7/2/98 Recvd By Region
Project Type residential subdivision
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
12 I - O Y O N F-27-43-4.5 wsIII NSW 030402 0.70
14 F -PT @N F- 27-43-4.5 wsrv Nsw 030402
26 F- O Y O -NF-r-27--43-4.5 wsItI Nsw 030402 F F-
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Mitigation required? Q Y # N
Did you request more info? Q Y .8 N
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y N
Recommendation: Q Issue ® Issue/Coed 0 Deny
Comments: ,
cc: Regional Office Page Number 1
Central Office IA
Kensington a Regency
Residential subdivision with NW 12, 14, and 26. The maps indicate that the Neuse Buffer will be
protected. Please include this language in the 401 Certification.
Please note: Due to time limitations I did not conduct a site visit. I discussed this project with
Steve Roberts. The Road crossing is located (partially on a pond dam) and in wetlands. This
Office recommends that forest vegetation be established (reestablished). That is, the Road
Crossing straighten the stream pathw?ditionally, see green highlighter for new pathway). This area should
be reestablished in forest vegetation. it should be required that sheet flow out side of
zone 2 of the riparian zone be achieved. Accordingly, no drop outlets for stormwater should be
allowed in the stitam. Stormwater management should be achieved through other means.
Just a thought: perhaps due to NBR a stomrwater management plan should be required?
MEMOPANDUM
TO: John Dorney
U Non-Discharge Branch
Regional Contact:
WO Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Preston East Apts County Wake
Project Number 98 0626 County2
Recvd From APP Region Raleigh
Received Date 6/28/98 Recvd By Region
Project Type apartments
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream . Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index, Prim. Supp. Basin Req.` Req.
14 O YO N 27-33-3 NSW 030402 I - r-
26 F-? O'Y Q N F- 27-33-3 I c NSW U30402 _? F-?
NBR ?- O YO N 27-33-3 NSW 030402 I -
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Mitigation required?
Did you request more info?
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached?
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant'.
Comments: Recommendation:
OY ON
O Y .0-tt-
O Y
O Y 0-14,
JV Issue 0 Issue/Cond O Deny
cc: Regional Office Page Number 1
Central Office
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
244 West Millbrook Road ¦ Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 [phone] ¦ Fax [phone]
98o6o2
June 30, 1998
Job # 98-3330
W R Qlji,? 4'F'
NCDEH&NR-DWQ US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn. Mr. John Dorney Attn. Mr. Todd Tugwell
4401 Reedy Creek Rd. 6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd. Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 276607 Raleigh, NC 27615-6846
Subj. Authorization request for Nationwide Permit 14 and 26
Penny Rd. Project
Dear Mr. Dorney and Mr. Tugwell:
The purpose of this letter is to request the authorization of Nationwide Permits 12, 14 and
26 for a series of channel and wetland impacts resulting from construction of a residential
subdivision (Kensington @ Regencey Phases I-IV). The property is owned by William
Gerald Smith and is located adjacent to the south side of Penny Rd. approximately 0.75
miles east of the SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd.)/SR 1379 (Penny Rd.) intersection (see Site
Vicinity Map). The impacts are illustrated on the attached site plan and summarized in
Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1. Impact summary arranged according to impact.
0?1_ I
mpact Type Ft2 WL CH Lin. Ft. Permit
Lin. FT. Major Minor
A CH 485 20 12
B W L 1227 26
C W L 12569 160 385 14
D W L -962-6 26
E W L -176 26
F W L 2188 26
Project Totals 30,771 160 20 --------
Note: Channel impacts requested under Nationwide Permit 14 have not been counted toward the
project total.
t.50 ?b 0
Soil/Site Evaluation ¦ Mapping and Physical Analysis ¦ Wetlands Mapping and Mitigation ¦ Environmental Audits
On-Site Waste Treatment Systems, Evaluation and Design
Table 2. Impact summary arranged according to permit.
Permit Wetland Channel
Major Minor
12 485 20 ft.
14 12569 ----- ------
26 17717
Note: Channel impacts requested under Nationwide Permit 14 have not been counted toward the
project total.
According to our evaluations, mitigation should not be required for this project.
Therefore, a plan to mitigate has not been submitted.
Please call if you have questions, or if you would like to schedule a site meeting.
Sincerely,
A-'_ '44
Steve Roberts
Attachments: Pre-construction Notification Form
Site Plan/ Impact Map
Agent Authorization Form
Wetland Data Forms
Site Vicinity Map
DWQ ID: Corps Action ID:
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit ft 12,14 and 26
Pre-Construction Notification Application
For Nationwide Permits that Require:
1) Notification to the Corps of Engineers
2) Application for Section 401 Certification
3) Coordination with the NC Division of Coastal Management
Send the original and (1) copy of this completed form to the appropriate field office of
the Corps of Engineers (see agency addresses sheet). Seven (7) copies should be sent to
the NC Division of Environmental Management (see agency addresses sheet). PLEASE
PRINT.
1. Owner's Name: William Gerald Smith
2. Mailing Address: 3212 Ten Ten Rd.
Subdivision Name:
City: Apex
State: NC Zip Code: 27502
Project location address, including subdivision name (if different from mailing address
above): The project area will be referred to as Kensington Q Regenca and is located
adjacent to the south side of Penny Rd. approximately 0.75 miles east of the SR 1010
(Ten Ten Rd.)/SR 1379 (Penny Rd.) intersection (see Site Vicinity Map).
3) Telephone Number (Home): (Work): 919 362 6573
4) If applicable, agents name or responsible corporate official, address, phone
number:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Phone: [phone]
244 W. Millbrook Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
5. Location of work (provide a map, preferable a copy of USGS topographic map or
aerial photograph with scale):
County: Wake Nearest town or city: Apex
Specific Location (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The project area is
located adjacent to the south side of Penny Rd. approximately 0.75 miles east of
the SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd.)/SR 1379 (Penny Rd.) intersection (see Site Vicinity
Map).
6. Impacted or nearest stream/river: Unnamed tributary of Dutchmans Branch
River Basin: Neuse
7a. Is project located near water classified as trout, tidal saltwater (SA), high quality
waters (HQW), outstanding resource waters (ORW), water supply (WS-I or WS-
II)? YES ? NO ® If yes, explain:
7b. If the project is located within a North Carolina division of coastal management
area of environmental concern (AEC)? YES ? NO
7c. If the project is located within a coastal county (see page 7 for list of coastal
counties), what is the land use plan (LUP) designation? NA
8a. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property?
YES ? NO ® If yes, provide Action ID number of pervious permit and any
additional information (including photocopy of 401 certification).
8b. Are additional permit requests expected for this property in the future?
YES ( ? ) NO ( ® ) If yes, describe anticipated work:
9a. Estimated total number of acres in tract of land: 58.6
9b. Estimated total number or acres of wetlands located on project site: 1_5
10a. Number of acres of wetlands impacted by the proposed project by:
Filling: 0.695 Excavation: 0.011
Flooding:
Other:
Drainage: Total acres to be impacted: 0.706
10b. (1) Stream channel to be impacted by the proposed project (if relocated,
provide distance both before and after relocation):
Length before: 385ft
After: 31 Oft
Width Before (based on normal high water contours): 3ft
Width After: NAft
Average depth before: 0.25ft
After: NAft
(2) Stream channel impacts will result from: (check all that apply)
Open channel relocation: n Placement of pipe in channel: E
Channel Excavation: n Construction of a Dam/Flooding: L1
Other:
11. If construction of a pond is proposed, what is the size of the watershed draining to
the pond? NA
What is the expected pond surface area? NA
12. Description of proposed work including discussion of type of mechanical
equipment to be used (attach plans 81/2" x 11" drawings only):
Construction of a residential subdivision using conventional methods and
equipment.
13. Purpose of proposed work: To provide desired housing near the town of Apex,
NC.
14. State reasons why it is believed that this activity must be carried out in wetlands
(include any measures taken to minimize wetland impacts): In order to utilize the
property effectively as a residential subdivision, wetlands and channels must be
impacted. Minimization measures include: elimination of unessential impacts and
the establishment of a vegetated buffer in a riparian area where forest vegetation
currently does not exist.
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) (see agency addresses sheet) regarding
the presence of any federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or
threatened species or critical habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the
proposed project. Date contacted: (attach responses from these agencies).
Handled by USACE
16. You are required to contact the state historic preservation officer (SHPO) (see
agency address sheet) regarding the presence of historic properties in the permit
area which may be affected by the proposed project. Date contacted:
Handled by USACE
17. Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public
(state) land?
YES ? NO ® If no, go to 18.
a. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document
pursuant to the requirements of the North Carolina Environmental Policy
Act?
YES ? NO ?
b. If yes, has the document been reviewed through the North Carolina
Department of Administration Stat Clearinghouse?
YES ? NO ?
If answers to 17b is YES, then submit appropriate documentation from the state
clearinghouse to division of environmental management regarding compliance
with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Questions regarding the State Clearinghouse review process should be directed to
Ms. Chrys Baggett, Director State Clearinghouse, North Carolina Department of
Administration, 116 West Jones Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-8003,
telephone [phone].
18. The following items should be included with this application if proposed activity
involves the discharge of excavated or fill material into wetlands:
a. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, lakes and ponds on
the property (for Nationwide Permit numbers 14, 18, 21, 26, 29 and 38). All
streams (intermittent and permanent) on the property must be shown on the
map. Map scales should be 1 inch equals 50 feet or 1 inch equals 100 feet or
their equivalent.
b. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant
to the placement of the delineation line.
d. Attach a copy of the storm water management plan, if required.
e. What is land used of surrounding property? Residential /Commercial
f. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? Sanitary Sewer
g. Signed and dated agent authorization letter, if applicable.
NOTE: Wetlands or Waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to:
1. Issuance of a Section 404 Corps of Engineers Permit,
2. Either the issuance or waiver of a 401 Division of Environmental
Management (Water Quality) certification, and
3. (in the twenty coastal counties only) A letter from the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management stating the proposed activity is consistent
with the North Carolina Coastal Management program.
,L-, 0, Y?Jk
Owner's/Agent's Signature
-3o--2 s
Date
(Agent's signature valid only if
Agent Authorization Letter from
the owner is provided (18 g.))
A-!37 03:34A
?1 ?4 rJ V ?11??µ*at?A
•.e,vv?
Soul & Environmental Consultants, inc.
244 West Millbrook Road • Raleigh, North CaraUrm 27609 is (919) 6(6-59001 Fax(919) 84"467
AGENT AUTHORIZAIrION FORM
ALL BUNKS 1'0 BE COMPLETED BY CURRENT NDOWNER
Name:
Address: __3Z/p_
Address: C_ r7 _0 Z_
Phone-
Z_
Project Namwoescription:
Date:
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Cc" of EUPneers
Wilminghrp District
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 29402
Attn: •
Fuld Office,
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Peruatting
To Whom It May CoAcem;
6r wo'
_1 5_4g01
`Mad-'ta. Nmt
V0We,J 7=s'VY'4
Q? CASE. mar Z SAY

L the content =Vertx owner, hereby designate and authedze Soil and
Euviropmental Consultants, Inc. to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of
permit applications, to furl ish upon request suppleweotal inform tiou Tin sa it of
applications, etc. frown this day fares Ord. This the !_?_ dry of
This ratification supersedes any previous correapaudeoce concerning the agent for
this project,
?? ? ?.csncd ?.n.
Print Ch*ners Name:
z
rEwirrt owners Sigmtare;
cY: Mr. John Dorney
NC DEKNR-DE M
Water Quality PlaRAIRS
4M Reedy Ct+eeh Road
Raleigh, NC VW7
cc: Mr. Steve Roberts
Soil and Enviroammeatal Cotwultants, Inc.
Sod/Site Evaluation r Mapping snd pttysic,+l Analysis ¦ Wcdrnds Mapping and Mitigation ¦ Envirvnfnenral Audits
On-Sire waste Tre2calcnt Systems, Evaluation and Dtsigr?

o
R -t n
}

s m.

=o coo o+?© __? o =??
1 U" ?§
11\\

?
7

io :. .n
o{
\`4 I ,
? , ? I I J? I I

ri
i "
i 3a
I
w
v ?
e: n

\ ?
I \
\ I
? r ._ _ _
?
\\ I
?I M
? £ N I I

:.
'
I f
i
? ?/?
z I ?:, I
M: //r
a. l i
I
u \ J
r r.z
J I "? I
?(
I I i
3 J

i
\.` \\ ? \ \ ?? / ? ?^ I II I I I y I

z
a
w
a
rn
A
z
" .J
:? ? `• \ > / ?\ `// N" ?1 I' \ ? \? i lvk Ili I, ? )y i ? i)

t I I ?R \ ?

Delineation Performed by: Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
244 West Millbrook Road 231 16th Avenue NE
Raleigh, NC 27609 Hickory, NC 28601
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Penny Road Date: 9-10-97
Applicant/Owner: Community Properties County: Wake
Investigator: Steve Roberts State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes
Is the site significantly disturbed
(Atypical situation)?
Is the area a potential problem area?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
11iriodendron tulipifera Canopy FAC
2.Quercus alba Canopy FACU
3.1'agus grandiflora Canopy FACU
4.Pinus tacda Canopy FAC
5.Cornus Florida Shrub FACU
61onicera japonica Vine FAC
7.Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC
81ycopodium obscurum Herb FACU
Community 1D: Mixed Hardwood Forest
No Transit ID:
No Plot ID:
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
9.Polystichuni acrosticoid . Herb FAC
10.Tipularia discolor Herb FACU
11.Goodyera repens Herb UPL
12.0iniaphila maculata Herb N1
13.
14.
15.
16.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 42%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (describe in remarks)
Stream, Lake or Tide. Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: _ ___>24 (in.)
Welland Hvdrolov-v Indicators
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators: (2 or more required)
Oxidized Root Channels in
Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC Neutral Test
Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase):
Taxonomy (Subgroup)
Appling fine sandy loam
Typic Kanhapludults
Drainage Class: Well
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description:
De
th Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
p
(ins.) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-8 Ap 10YR 5/2 sandy loam
8-11 E 10YR 6/4 sandy loam
11-14 BE 7.5YR5/6 sandy clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Hislic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Ayuic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Remarks: No indicators
Wetland Determination
(circle yes or no)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? No
Is This Sampling Point Within a Wetland? No
Remarks:
_ Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (explain in remarks)
Delineation Performed by: Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
2.14 West Millbrook I?oad 231 16th Avenue NE
Raleigh, NC 27609 Hickory, NC 28601
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone](0
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Penny Road Date: 9-10-97
Applicant/Owner: Community Properties County: Wake
Investigator: Steve Roberts State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes
Is the site significantly disturbed
(Atypical situation)?
Is the area a potential problem area?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1.Acer ruhrum Canopy FAC
2.Quercus phellos Canopy FACW-
3.Liriodendron tuh fera Canopy FAC
4.Vacciniriin corymbosum Shrub FACW
5.Alnus serrulata Shrub FACW+
6.Salix caroliniana Shrub OBL
7.Arundinaria gigantea Shrub FACW
8. Woodzaardia areolata Herb OBL
Community ID: Bottomland Hardwood
No Transit ID:
No Plot ID: Wetland C
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
9. Carex lurida Herb OBL
10.0smunda cinamomea Herb FACW+
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 1(X)%
Remarks:- ------
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (describe in remarks)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge.
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 10 (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: _ _1_ (in.)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
X Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
X Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Seconda ry Indicators: (2 or more required)
X Oxidized Root Channels in
Upper 12 Inches
X Water-Stained Leaves
X Local Soil Survey Data
X _ FAC Neutral Test
Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wehadkee and Bibb soils
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquents
Drainage Class: Poorly
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(ins.) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-7 A 10YR 4/2
7-10 Btlg 10YR 5/2
10-20 B12g 10YR 6/2
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
_X_ Aquic Moisture Regime
_X_ Reducing Conditions
_X_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Remarks:
silt loam
silty clay loam
fine sandy clay 6w,-
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
Organic: Streaking in Sandy Soils
_X_ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_X_ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (explain in remarks)
Wetland Determination
(circle yes or no)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Is This Sampling Point Within a Welland? Yes
Remarks:
001--
'SOIL $C??
\N C. 2 TS
'Q;J
1Q03 ? o
OF/VORTH GP.,//
Site Vicinity Map
For the
Penny Road Project
Apex quadrangle (USGS 7.5 minute series) I
Scale =1:2000
8 ?.f? ', i / , ,Mf`--?'?? ?-?????,??. ? ? iii/ `--!? ???? _ y??
LU/
Rath J, ? I ?^ ???/? 1 74 . ?I I f •?? au ?? I %
pl
aES? ?? iTo erl
\ Loo'oui, ° IIQ
Tower it
/
50 6M
480
? _
.00
-Cern
;
l ? ' ??? \ ,win .:•_ ? ,.? ll i'; ?' -- ,¢,?_ -?.
7
\ \ J
L
45
4 8
43M
x'j
-0,
50
j I mo? ;;I 5tmi
I ' ` •?r•? ? • 1 ??V r I I C r ? ?I -- ? ? ? ? r??? r
Cern %
I ?
- ~ -s
PENNY ROAD SHALL QE WIDENED ACROSS / ~ ~ ti / ~
FRON AGE OF THIS PROPERTY TO ONE-HALF ~ ~ ~ OF 5 BB & 78 R/W PER TOWN OF CARY X"" ~ ~
~ THOR UGHFARE PLAN. ~ / ~ ~
~ ~ y ~ i
COMM N OPEN SPACE i ~ ~ c 1 = ,
MAINT IN._D BY HO ~IEOWNERS ~
ASSO IATION 0.81 ACfZES ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~
30' STREETSCAPE ~ ~ ~
BUFF R. MINIM M .EXISTING HOUSE E U
OF AN P T & OTHER STRUCTURES ~ ~ C 0 Y REES ~ / p TO B REMOVED ~ ! ~
EVERY 40 , 2.5 / / ~ CALIPER AT PLANTING ~ /
N
50 ~ / 85
OR' ~ ";9 21,881 S.F. 50 BUILDING Ea~E'. ~ o
SETBACK FROM ~ - . ' ~
PENNY ROAD / ~ - •
~ - / bry R• ~ i
~ 'J ~~P~ ,
1 ^ ~ i / X19' V 4 t Y
~c / `,l i 29, 410 S. F.
~ ~ / 1, ~ ~ ~ , ~ 83 4
t a~~ a~ , • 3 ` 22,106 S.F. 1 \ ~ oa ~ 5 5
~ ( A~ ~ 1 / Dsl i pA ~ / 1'h
~ 8 2 i~ i ~ i
~ ~ ° ~ 26,595 S•F• /
F / ~i _ r ~ ~ /
/
~ 81
p / / ~ 31,483 S.F• ! / sa;'~s 1 ~ s
/ . . n 29,44, S.F. s 8 0
~1 a . ~ S ~ 72 / . ',,t 32,626 S.F. CH N .i' ` I
- r % / 37,091 S.F• 71
_ I L WET i ; ' 41,364 S.F.
~O TYP. / EXISTING r` 7 R S; /
TREE LINE ~ , - - . • i 27,9 s•F. ~ / • M 2 ? ~ / M i ~ N
27 487 F ~ t ' ~ ~ / / " s.. !
' z g / / ~ s
.F, 7 4 J / ~ 26,653 S.F.
a 70 3 / / n EN C N RIVER 28,397 s.F. N 3 N
NEW CHANNEL BA BUFFER o ~ 75 ~ ~ v ° / O
° . / 1 \ / ! 24,117 S.F. W NDS IMPA T
BEGIN CHANNEL / - 2 69 \ 45, v ° ° ° ~ ~ ~ p, / 61 • 6 ~ . IMPACT „ 20,292 S.F.
C............ \ 23,408 S.F.
M APPROXIMAT /
°°v°° / 77 \ . ° , TREE LINE / 3 R UTILITY RELATED
22,869 S.F. u ~ r°v° °v° P. 68 r
CHANNEL / ~ ~ ° ~ ' iBg 26,6 3 .F. / EXISTING A ANITA Y 'W S R SE. ER CROSSING. .485 SF
19 / / NOW OR FORMERLY ~ ~ TREE LINE
? • ~ia°.%fi~ 19,399 S.F. / / DANBURY SUBDIVISION / ° 20 LF _
/ ~ / / ZONED R-1000 (SINGLE FAMILY) ~ /9• /
AVE. LOT SIZE-13,700 SF ~ ~ ROADWAY CROSs~
V. ~ , 18 ~ ~ . 67 3 90 S.F 30 R
~ TYP. ~DPO$ 19,587 S. 27,171 S.F. 20 ~L 0. ' \ ~ CONCRETE B STA. 15+00 ~ KENSINGTON HILL WAY. 1 . ,227 SF
~,F 1 7 2,,220 S.F• ~ \ SIDEWALK' ~
' ~ , 20,040 S.F. ~ i C OLD POND ,AREA . .12,569 SF
5 i 16 160 LF
f ~ 26,405 S.F, ~ ,9,So6 S.F. 15 LOT FILLS
\ / 19,734 S.F. SITE ~ 6
\ k _ T ~ TRIANGLE y 1 22,443 S.F. / K ; ~ D LOT 3 . , 9,026 SF
~ 9 s 0,0 , S.F. 21
6 1 _ / c~ _ 22 r / ~ 24,014 S.F. E LOT 78. .5,276 5F
24,181 S.F. ~ p ~ 20,144 S.F, r -
2 3 \ 13 ~ / / 2o,ss, s.F, u NOW OR FORMERLY F LOT 79. • 2,188 SF
65 ~ WINDSOR OAKS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
\ 24 HOMEOW V \ ~ 9 ' a 20,295 S.F. \ 21,086 S.F. ~a'' ~ MB 1984 PG 1591
v, -7 u ZONE 2 5 , u, ZONED R-40W WAKE COUNTY NOTE:
' / - .o \ , . - 21,018 S.F. 1 2 22,484 S.F. • AVE sINGLE FAMILY NEUSE RIVER BUFFER SH W AVE. LOT SIZE-12,023 SF 0 N SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION
~ 19 843 S.F. BY NCDENR-DWG.
\ ~ 26 / o~ \ 0 21,177 S.F. ~ G \ U
\ / ~ t 6 4
\ ~ \ 20,617 S.F, ~ P
8 \ 3 4 27 / 20,,64 S.F. IIJ_ 19,177 S.F. 3 3
° 11 20133 S.R. HANK IMPA T S
' 18,242 S.F. SIDEWALK I~'- \ ~V 19,745 S.F. ~ ~ ~ P. \ /
\ r - L ~ ~ O \ 63 ROADWAY CROSS.
\ - \ ~ 20,854 S.F. 32 ,F
\ / 9 25 462 S.F, _
20,810 S.F. 1 ~ Q 0 _ 35 C OLD POND AREA , .385 LF r
, F 31 q 8,817 S.. 18,752 S.F, i
28 4 F 26,0 6 S.. \ 32 640 S.F. 3 0 ~ ` NOTE:
~ 'gas ' 1 6 \ 29 v ~ \ J 21,744 S.F. Now oR FORMERLY THIS CHANNEL IMPA T I
4'~ m \ 20,139 S.F. ~ ` - 8 S.F. J01 V JOHN & CAROL SMITH C S CONTAINED COMPLETELY
I WAKE couNTY P.I.N. WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DRAINED POND BED.
- 3 6 ~ F \ - Z ~ 20,133 S.. / HAS , I 20,743 _ 0761.03-04-2159 ZONED R-12 (VACANT)
/ / ~ FUTUR FUTURE PHASE OF FERNWOOD
SUBDIVISION
/ 61 46 / / 20,494 S.F,
23,049 S.F. \ s,. , / \
37 44 ~ \ _ 11 J 4„ 42 41 ~ 26,,97 S.F. ro
40 3 9 - ~ 25,922 S.F, lg 760 S.F, 19,889 S F. 19,667 S.F. 19 445 S.F. 1 F ~ - - , 9,387 S.. 2,116 S.F,
51 o \ ~
PROP 5' ~ , \ CONCR \ 6 O 3 a
4 7 a - J L_ _ ~ '0 ~ - - ~ 25 915 S.F. N o~ N
22,687 S.F. v _ - --°i- \ \a 7 V r
r N 23 t--•- ~nf - ~ ~ \ \ n
a D,l 1 \ \
' ~ r 1 110,1' '.10• 110.. J~' e ~ 00 0
R=36.5' - - ~ NHAL - \ \ I so R -1 59
\ ~ wETLANt ti 36,037 S.F. WETLANDS r''.
48 5 50 ~ ~ . N 30 890 S.F. 51 ~ 51 ~ ~ ~ 5 8 ,.r; i ~
53 54 ,9„D S.F. 55 57 ' _ 5 6 Q 49 r 4 , 18,217 S•F• 18,150 S.F. 18,150 S.F. 18,150 S.F, 18,150 S.F, 21,056 S•F, ~ r 19,434 S.F, 2 ,6 2 S.F. ~ ~,i ~
N 19,443 S.F. ~ • ' i ~~1~ ~r ~
G R ,r , ~ APHIC SCALE i ~
~ - - - - ~ J r _J L >r ~ - - , ~ ~ ioo o so ~o0 20o aoo
c ~ NOVV OR FORMERLY NOW OR FORMERLY Nas'22'at'w ~sla•~t'
DANBURY SUBDIVISION DANBURY SUBDIVISION
a ZONED R-1000 (SINGLE FAMILY ( IN FEET )
1- DIIF I (1T CI7F.17 'i99 CF
i inca = iuu it.
r
Revisions WITHERS & RAVENEL En meerin & Surveying, Inc.
C 9 9 No. Description, Date B KENSINGTON @ REGENCY / EDrawn Scale CAD File 1"=100' SHTWI.DWG
111 MocKenon Drive Carl, N.C. 27511 A LOT REVISIONS BY OWNER 47-16-79-8 GAS B REVISIONS BY OWNER 6 4 98 GAS _ WETLANDS PERMITTING MAP Dote Sheet No. 4/16/98
co [m PHASES I WITHERS k IV 919-489-3340 FAX [phone] REVISIONS Y S&EQ y Job No.
Y 96167 of

~~r
I / /
P NNY ROAD SHALL BE WIDENED ArR~SS , I I ~ / / E J , / -
FRONTAGE OF THIS PROPERTY TO ~ NE-HALF , J ~ / 1
OF 53 8B & 78 R/W PER TOWN F ~ , ~ r ~
P N. ' ' / THOROUGHFARE LA , ~ ~
/ rr i r / rr- r COMMON OPEN SPACE i i ~ / ± r r
Y HOMEOWNERS ~ ! \ ~ ~~\tJJ f MAINTAINED B , . \
ASSOCIATION (0.81 ACRES) , i I - ~ ; J \ r ..,,.-~i
. \ I I ~ rr rr r r
' STREETSCAPE / ~ + r i r 30 EXISTING HOUSE f r ~ , 1 , r r ,
UFFER. MINIMUM r ~ ~ / 1 1 + \ r r B & OTHER STRUCTURES \ I1 < r r i
CANOPY TREES / , / I I + I OF ~ 70 BE REMOVED ~ / / I I r I i
EVERY 40 , 2.5 ' ~ ;'r I \ ~ , CALIPER AT PLANTING / ` `
' \ / ' III I ,,,r+'»»`\`\\`~\ \ r I -4 Y 4,y ~ i i
R, / / I I ~ 21,8$'1 S.F. j ~ + j °e ' ? r t i
50~ BUILDING ERA' ' / I i i i l i ' ~I `v +
0~ r / - III , +?y~ 1.11' SETBACK FROM , ~ J / _ I ? ~ I I I + I ~ r i i
PENNY ROAD i \ / / I •C "T 1 ? i I i i ~ ~ i', a i / Y ~ ~ 11 f l jilt ~ 1ii I r i ~ i
V`'' r \ ? I 1 1 i 1j1 ` 1 1 1 1 1 1Ir I r r
',,,y , ~ 7 'h\, III \ I l r III , W ~ ! / i i ? ' //i'I 1111 I 4 II , I
/ ~i9` J / J 111 ' III 1 ~P r r l r 2,410 S.F. III tr-__ ~ rr, I II ' I / t
? ~ ~ ? 1 V I , r 1 1 r ' 1~~ ` / ~ , i III ? ~ I l i r r r I r i
~ r I V I ` J tl e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / / ~ 1j1 r' / 11 1!!I 1 II ~ ~ r r 22,16 S.F / 1 1 1 J/ r 1 1 i t
/ ~ ~ / rr ~ < I I ' / ~ / i Iii ~ ' I ' '
~ t , / ~ ? ~6,595r S.Fr
i
y % r /f ! r r ~ / r r I I
? / ! / / / ! r f ! ! ~ i`r r / I
rr 1 / r.J f ! / / lilt / / r ~ r r / / 1 l ~ ~ / 1 /
~ I i r f / / Qi r r / ~ ; 31,483,5.F. r F / \t .
r fr I l ~ , J i j / r-, r r / % yJ / / / / ~ / t / / /
' ' ' / 3,626 ~4.F. , / / / ~ ,'~'9''% r ! i / j ' / , / / / / I ,,a , r , ~ , r / / t 37,091 S.F. 71 ,
? r rr ~ , y'" ? r ` 41364 S.F. J ' ~
- - 7 ,
/ I J -..L / X79 S.F.
I ING r / r II / / r • . V /
TREE LINE I y ~ ' r r' r'' i 11 i ' I ~ i /
? '
/ _ / _ / r ~ 26,653 5 , / r . /
/ / , ,r r • , t' . RNER \ / ~ . 223,3 .F. ~ p
r ? BUFFER J
r - '4117 ? z 9 , J t J I
/ / . , ~ ~ ,0,29 .F.,/ r / / r , ~ ' i '.9'
/ I / 23,408 ~.f. / r / /
t / ~ S~.TII~
r / / I r 3 , / / V / . , 485 SF
i J / a 22,869 S.F. r P• ; ; ' EXISTING 1 ~ , ~ ~ J J 26~ S . t / ( A SANITARY SEWER CROSSING. EXISTING
~ ~ \ , , \ I TREE u N 20 LF TREE u E
, / ! / i J / ' ? r
R Y i J ~ / ' ` 19,399 SF,,~ % t ~ NOW OR FORME L , J J ~ / t , / / ? I
DANBURY SUBDIVISION ,r J s ' / 11 I ROADWAY CROSSINGS
ZONED R-1000 (SINGLE Y)~, J , ~ ` ~ . ~ / 1 i F . .12,569 S C OLD POND AREA
T IZE=13 700 SF ~ nvE. LOS ~ _ 671 ? - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ 27171 ~F. 130 LF
~ 3 S.F 0 ~ 19,587 S. t~ 20-'~ ~ ? 6 SF
~ ' ~ CON ETE ~ ..--2T"Z2~~S.F. 7 ~ ; WAY EMBANKMENT LOT 78. 30 C ROAD
I 4 S.F. r I r - 20' 0 i
? ~ - i t r ~ .16
r 1 26,405 S.F. ~
' ) ' ~ 1 Z34 S F. \ SITE , r / / ~ --,1 ~ 'iRT~CNGLE 22•+43 S.. ~ SF . .5,276 E LOT 7&
4 ` ,
! ~ J r tr 71 S.F. 1 t ~ ~ .2,188 SF F LOT 79
, / ~ , ~ 24,0'14 S.F. J r ~ /
I'J \ x'24,181 SyE , - ~ ` ? ~ 3 , , NOW OR Ff NOW OR FORMERLY
; , ` ~ ? ; ` ~ ` - WINDSOR WINDSOR OAKS N TE: 0
ti r \ L .1! WNERS AS' y ,.r / ~ 20,0 SrF. r ~ ~ , - HOMED / ~ r \ ? 4 / 48.9• ~ ~ 20,295 S.F. - 4 I EOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. CT TO VERIFICATION NEUSE RIVER BUFFER SHOWN SUBJE
~ ~ J / \ \ ? ~ \ MB 198 , _ _ / - / J i ~ 21,+x,86 S.F. \\ZONED R-40W _ _ _ MB 1984 PG 1591 - ZONED R-40W WAKE COUNTY Y NCDENR-DWQ. 6
/ ~ , r \ SINGLE I SINGLE FAMILY
~r ?r 'r~~" / _ r ~ I \ Y1VE. LOT SIZE Y~VE. LOT SIZE=12,023 SF
' J 6 / r ` I 1[2,48 S.F. i i
2 x _ I ~ ~ 64 / i / \ ! 1,1'7 ~.F. / / i
r ; . S / \ 1 1 I 1 / ,r' 20,61~,.i;.F. / ~ , ti 1
r _ I 34 T P
j ' i ? I 20,16 , ,
r 7 2 3 r ,17h .F. ; , - ' ~ . SID ALK ~ ~ ~ / ~ 1, 20.133' S. . S.F.
i ' i / ' / ~ ,42 / ~ 745 S.F. ~ Bo
3, 6
~ J.. ~ \t ~ / r 20,8 S.F. AREA . .130 LF C OLD POND
? / / / ~ 1+i ~ ~ 1 / .i / i \ ` 25,462 S.F. ~
% 18,817/S.F. ' ? ,752 S.F, , ~
\ \ ,3 Q NOW OR NOW OR FORMERLY
, 32,640 S.F{? ~ t `r - - - \ I ~ ~ 21,744 S.F. ~ r r S. JOHN & CJ JOHN & CAROL SMITH
• \ I 2 139 $F. i i r / i r 5.--~' WAKE COl ' WAKE COUNTY P.LN.
\ 6 0761.03-04-2159
` ` ` i r 3 ~ ' ~ ' ~ ONED R-' ~ I r / ~ Z ZONED R-12 (VACANT)
/ / ~ ? 20133 S.F. HAS ~ I . r Ftlrlmt P FUTIHtt PHASE OF FERNWOOD
SUBDNISION
r' r ' 23;09 S.F. ? r t i ~ i 1 J~ / % / a~~' ~ ' i i ~
l~L~ I , , 26 97 ~F. J r i '
4 0 \ 43 J , r / ~ 25,922 S.F. 18,760 S.F.? 19,88 S.F. r 19,667 ~.F. f 19,445 S.Fr 19,38 S.F. ,1165.F.1 r / / / -
1 ? ' 1 r r r / r / J ' r / ' t I ~ r / , , ~ / J J r ~
, / ~ , / / i i/ r J 25 15 S.F. N . / 47J - , , , , ~
r / 22,68 S.F. , / / ~ i~ ~ / J ~ ! ~
i / r Jr f' ~ ~ ~ , r / ~ r - ~ J / / / + i
i t
~TtAI~IDS
r r 60 ? I ? ? r J J l i i ' . i ' / / / i x36,037 S.. , I i
i , r 8 r - J I / + . r r fr / , , / ~ J, ~ r / I
1 o , ? I 1 t 1 r 7 / I / J 5 n n r n n 4 n y~'~ / / f t 2 3 1 I _ 51 a _ . GRAPHIC SCALE .
J 0,890 S.F.r , 19,110 S.F. r r r ~ r / / J •F• ,612 S.F~ ; / I I ~ r r J / 19,434r~ ~ r ? ~ ~ / 49 18 217 S.Ft 18150 sF. 1 ,150 S.. 1 ,15a S.. 48, S.E. X1,0 ,S.F. , , I 1 I, 100 ~ 50 too 200
' r• I + 443 S.F. r J , r r / 1 ~ / J / ~ ' ~ . _ i I /
1 ~ ~ t\ / r r ~ 1 + rJ % Jr I r / JJ J lJ l I' I /r? ' . / / / I j % 1 i ! j ' 1 / rf ~ J r J j ~ ...,r' ( r/ I ~ ! / r I ~ 44 J / ~i~•
, \ ! I / ~ (IN FEET )
? \ ~ » NOW 0 FORME Y / 22'A ~ r-:..,,_r1 ~ , ~ ~ , , r 1 ~ /t„/ ..r r/ ~ i r\-„a' I I I ~.IN F K~ RLY \ I , ! . t, / _q / r i / ' ; ? r ~ 1 inch = 1 ff»
, , ~ ~ _ _ t!, c r".~,,,,n ci io nclnt~ r _ , r r r-, A ! _ / ~ .?Pr r / / ~
rWRY SUBQM UHINDUIYI QVD inawy. ',i / r v V i j / )
r r ZONED R-1000 SINGLE bMILY / ! t t I . r~, , Ate, LOT SIZE- 123 SF
EC 1"=100' SHTWI.DI
y Date Sheet No.
EChosickedd Scale CAD File WETLANDS PERMITTING MAP AS 4 _16/98
WlIHERS & RAVENEI Engineering & Surveying.. Inc. No. Descri tion Date OJEC A LU L REV15ION5 gX QWNER A/16/0 KENSINGTON @ REGENCY W1 of FC 9616 7
111 MacKenan Drlve 6ary, NI,CI' 17511
FID evisions 919-469-3340 FAX [phone] PHASES I IV N k AV N REVISIONS PER NCDENR-DWQ 9 30 98 IL By Job No,

WI N ACROSS ~ ~ ~ PENNY ROAD SHALL BE DE ED ~ ~
- A F ~ ~i~ FRONTAGE OF THIS PROPERTY TO ONE H L i ~ / ~
OF 53'66 & 78' R/W PER TOWN OF CARY ~ ; - ~ ~ THOROUGHFARE PLAN. ~ j' / ~ ~
i j~~ i ~ ~
COMMON OPEN SPACE
MAINTAINED BY HOMEOWNERS ~ ~ ~ ~
ASSOCIATION (0.81 ACRES) ~ ~ / ~ ;o;~ ~
/ i- 30~ STREETSCAPE XI TING HOUSE X'~
ES ~ BUFFER. MINIMUM
& OTHER STRUCTURES ~ / ~ ~ OF CANOPY TREES j „ TO BE REMOVED ~ /
EVERY 40 , 2.5 ~ ~
A IPER AT PLANTING ~ / C L g,,~ / 13~ . ~
85 o ~ ~
pR• 3~ ; 21,881 S.F.
' BUILDING R~~~ ~ 50 Eon ,e,~° ~ _ - SETBACK FROM , ~o = ~ ~ ' ~ -
PENNY ROAD ~ / - ~ / -
~ ti R, / / /
~ / P~~ ~ p0
~ OqF ~ ~ ~ ~ 41 F. 1~ ~ ~ 29, 0 S.
/ B i 83
~ oo ` ~ ^ R'=4O ~ ~a oy ~ j ~9 22,106 S.F. /
/ S ~ ~ / ~ V'~t~r139 ~ `
a 82
/ i s~ ~ . 26,595 S. F. i~ ~ ~
Q ~ ~ i~ o n~ ~y i ~
R i
i Nb .66 ~ / i ~ ~ ~ 1 i i z, / 8 eT % • ~ Sb~ fit. ,,F`~
~l , 31,483 S.F. / i ~ ~ c• ~ / / ~ ~ ~
LCD _ il ' ~ \ - - 80 29,441 S.'~. J
M1+' H i ~J ~ / 2 ~ , ~a~?a- - 32,626 S.F. ~ . i V ~ ~ CH N % -
/ _ _ I i 37,091 S.F. ~ 1
~0'0~ / i~ ~ 41 4 F - L. WET ; ~ ~ ,36 s. . l~) i
~70 . ~ P. / 7 EXISTING ~ . _ S ; ~ /
~ R _ 27,9 s.F. TREE LINE Z , ~ ' / / N N
2 • 27,487 S.F. ~ ! ~ i 0' ~ /
z g w . 74
,F. ~ I ~ ; ~ ~ a~ ~ /r~ ~ ~ 26,653 S.F. 7 ~ . 1 0 3
vvovvd ~ / n EN C IV 28,397 S.F. - N R ER o n N
~ -1 F IMPACT BA BUFFER O h
NEW CHANNEL 7 5 ~ ° WETLANDS IMPACTS
iv ° i / i~• 24,117 S.F. \ l i ~ 69
BEGIN CHANNEL 45, ~;d• ~ ; - ' ~ P• . L 6 20,292 S.F.
IMPACT vvvvvv ?vvv v•• ~ ~'r 23,408 S. F, ~ \ nvv •vtvv v
vv vvvv n 1 id••' ' - ~ APPROXIMAT ~
i 77 • dvv • TREE LINE ~ 3 'R UTILITY RELATED
...v 22,869 S.F, p. 6 ~ ~ ~vvvv vvo . ~ ~ev... _ E) EXISTING A SANITARY SEWER CROSSING. .485 SF
CHANNEL ` : ° ~~9 26,s 3 .F. / TF TREE LINE
19 / ~ •vvvvvv ~ vvvvvv ~ / / 20 LF
NOW OR FORMERLY 19,399 S.F.
(VISION / / ~ ~ ~ / / DANBURY SUBD a ZONED R-1000 SINGLE FAMILY ~ `y, /
( ) / ~ AVE. LOT SIZE=13,700 SF / ~ ROADWAY CROSSI~
18 ~ 67 3 90 S.F 30'R p 19,587 S. ~ 27,171 S.F. B STA. 15+00 ~ KENSINGTON HILL WAY. .1,227 SF
np. ~0 OSE 2O ,
• ~L O. CONCRETE 21 220 S.F. ~ ~ ~ SIDEWALK ~ C OLD POND AREA . .12,569 SF
' ~ 20,040 S. F. ~ ~ ~ . ~ i 160 LF
~ \ 16 , ~
~ ~ 26,405 S.F. ~ ~ ~ 19,566 S.F. i 15 ~ LOT FILLS
~ SITE ~ 6 6 f 19,734 S.F.
~ • \ TRIANGLE 22,443 s.F. r y / D LOT 3 . , 9,026 SF
14 ~ 9 , \ / 21 _ V tr 0 071 S.F.
~ 22 r 6 / 4 14 F / 2 ,0 S. . E LOT 78. .5,276 SF
24,181 S.F. ~ Q ~ 20,144 S.F. s. - 2 3 NDW NOW OR FORMERLY F LOT 79. ~ ~ ~ ~ .2,188 SF
~ 13 / ~ / 20,661 .,.F. ~ WIN WINDSOR OAKS
~ \ ~ 20,066 S.F. °r ~ - 65 24 ~ . HOMEOWNER HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
\ V ~ Qea' 20,295 S.F. 21,086 S.F. MB MB 1984 PG 1591 NOTE:
\ ~ - - ZONED R 7 25 ~ o~,~ SI ZONED R-40W WAKE COUNTY sINCLE FAMILY NEUSE RIVER BUFFER SHOWN SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION
o ~ ~ ` ' - ~ AVE. LO 21,018 S.F. 1 2 22,484 S.F. AVE. LOT SIZE=12,023 SF
v.r - m 19,843 S.F. 26 z \ ~ G~ - BY NCDENR-DWc~.
\ 21,177 S.F. o ~ 64
\ / ~ \ / \ ~l ~ 20,617 S.F.
\ P ~ 3 4
8 I~ 7 / 20,164 S.F. 2 C~IANNEL IMPACTS
19,177 S.F. 3 3 1 1 zo 133 s.F. SIDEWALK S'€-
\ 41 19,745 S.F. ~ ~0 ~ 8' P, / ~
\ \ r o 6 3 \ - ROADWAY CROSS111~GS
\ \ 20,854 S.F.
\ / 9 ~ 25,462 S.F. / - - Q C OLD POND AREA . .385 LF
20,810 S.F. 1 0 35
~1 31 - - A 18,817 S.F. 18,752 S.F. ~p~ 28 26,D46 S.F.
"~fl ' \ 32,640 S.F. 6 ~ N N NOTE:
~'<.u \ 2 ;J 1 744 .F. C ~ \ J 2 , s , a s.F. JOHN NOW OR FORMERLY THIS CHANNEL IMPACT IS CONTAINED COMPLETELY JOHN & CAROL SMITH
a~4 N \ 20,139 S.F. ~ WAK WAKE couNrY P.LN. WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DRAINED POND BED.
07E 0761.03-D4-2159
45 _ 36 - ZONE( ~ 'as 20,133 S.F. / PHAS I 20,743 . . ZONED R-12 (VACANT)
/ , FUTURE PI FUTURE PHASE OF FERNWOOD
/ - - c - P I~-- 61 SUBDIVISION
/ / 4 6 - , i 20 494 S.F.
23,049 S.F. ~ ~ / 37 a
~ _ -1 - 44 ~ 43 42 41 40 26,197 S.F. N
39 - 25,922 S.F. 18,760 S.F. 19,889 S.F. 19,667 S. F. 19,445 S,F, 19,387 S.F. 4 2,116 S.F. ~ -
- / 5q r , n: ~ \
PROP 5' / , CONCR \ ~ O ,3
~ ~ 4 7 ,m o - - cin~ 1____ , F ry •p 25,9 5 S..
22,687 S.F. v N \ o
_ ~ , 3 ° ac ~ - 3':°}~~
I/ J~ ~ 110.1' ttQ' 110' 11n
CD / 9~
m R=36.5' - - N++AL - - ~ I~ I- 5 9 60 R -I I ~ I r WETLANDS I WETLANDS
36,037 S.F ~
48 5 ~ 50 ~ , N ~ ~ ~ 58 i .~1 %'i ~
3D,E39D S.F. ~ 51 ~ 5 2 5 3 5 4 ~ 5 7 ,911D S. F. 55 _ 56 4 J F 1 150 S.F. 24,612 S.F, 18,217 S.. 8, 18,150 S.F. 18,150 S,F, 18,150 S.F. 21,056 S.F. 19,434 S. F. ~ .S
cu 19,443 S.F. j , ~ GRAPHIC SCALE
__~L__ L I II ~ ~ 0 50 20D 400
J ~ - J L~ ~ L_ - ~
~ NOW OR FORMERLY NOW OR FORMERLY N89'22'41"w 1614.11' ~
g DANBURY SUBDIVISION DANBURY SUBDIVISION ( [N FEET )
_ inn u
3 LUNLU K- I UUU ~Z) NULL rAM LT)
AVE. LOT SIZE=12 322 SF u~ /
r Designer Scale CAD File
Revisions ERS & RAVENEL Engineering & Surve in , Inc. WITH Y 9 No. Description Date j JEC 1"=100' SHTWI.DWG
/ KENSINGTON @ REGENCY WETLANDS PERMITTING MAP Drawn By Date Sheet No. GAS 4/16/98
111 MacKenan Drive Cary, N. C. 27511 A LOT REVISIONS BY OWNER 4 16 98 B REVISIONS BY OWNER 6/4/98 PHASES I _ Checked By Job No.
WITHER S & RAENEL 919-469-3340 FAX [phone] REVISION Y S&EC 6 2 98 y JEC 96167 of

- ~ -s
PENNY ROAD SHALL QE WIDENED ACROSS / ~ ~ ti / ~
FRON AGE OF THIS PROPERTY TO ONE-HALF ~ ~ ~ OF 5 BB & 78 R/W PER TOWN OF CARY X"" ~ ~
~ THOR UGHFARE PLAN. ~ / ~ ~
~ ~ y ~ i
COMM N OPEN SPACE i ~ ~ c 1 = ,
MAINT IN._D BY HO ~IEOWNERS ~
ASSO IATION 0.81 ACfZES ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~
30' STREETSCAPE ~ ~ ~
BUFF R. MINIM M .EXISTING HOUSE E U
OF AN P T & OTHER STRUCTURES ~ ~ C 0 Y REES ~ / p TO B REMOVED ~ ! ~
EVERY 40 , 2.5 / / ~ CALIPER AT PLANTING ~ /
N
50 ~ / 85
OR' ~ ";9 21,881 S.F. 50 BUILDING Ea~E'. ~ o
SETBACK FROM ~ - . ' ~
PENNY ROAD / ~ - •
~ - / bry R• ~ i
~ 'J ~~P~ ,
1 ^ ~ i / X19' V 4 t Y
~c / `,l i 29, 410 S. F.
~ ~ / 1, ~ ~ ~ , ~ 83 4
t a~~ a~ , • 3 ` 22,106 S.F. 1 \ ~ oa ~ 5 5
~ ( A~ ~ 1 / Dsl i pA ~ / 1'h
~ 8 2 i~ i ~ i
~ ~ ° ~ 26,595 S•F• /
F / ~i _ r ~ ~ /
/
~ 81
p / / ~ 31,483 S.F• ! / sa;'~s 1 ~ s
/ . . n 29,44, S.F. s 8 0
~1 a . ~ S ~ 72 / . ',,t 32,626 S.F. CH N .i' ` I
- r % / 37,091 S.F• 71
_ I L WET i ; ' 41,364 S.F.
~O TYP. / EXISTING r` 7 R S; /
TREE LINE ~ , - - . • i 27,9 s•F. ~ / • M 2 ? ~ / M i ~ N
27 487 F ~ t ' ~ ~ / / " s.. !
' z g / / ~ s
.F, 7 4 J / ~ 26,653 S.F.
a 70 3 / / n EN C N RIVER 28,397 s.F. N 3 N
NEW CHANNEL BA BUFFER o ~ 75 ~ ~ v ° / O
° . / 1 \ / ! 24,117 S.F. W NDS IMPA T
BEGIN CHANNEL / - 2 69 \ 45, v ° ° ° ~ ~ ~ p, / 61 • 6 ~ . IMPACT „ 20,292 S.F.
C............ \ 23,408 S.F.
M APPROXIMAT /
°°v°° / 77 \ . ° , TREE LINE / 3 R UTILITY RELATED
22,869 S.F. u ~ r°v° °v° P. 68 r
CHANNEL / ~ ~ ° ~ ' iBg 26,6 3 .F. / EXISTING A ANITA Y 'W S R SE. ER CROSSING. .485 SF
19 / / NOW OR FORMERLY ~ ~ TREE LINE
? • ~ia°.%fi~ 19,399 S.F. / / DANBURY SUBDIVISION / ° 20 LF _
/ ~ / / ZONED R-1000 (SINGLE FAMILY) ~ /9• /
AVE. LOT SIZE-13,700 SF ~ ~ ROADWAY CROSs~
V. ~ , 18 ~ ~ . 67 3 90 S.F 30 R
~ TYP. ~DPO$ 19,587 S. 27,171 S.F. 20 ~L 0. ' \ ~ CONCRETE B STA. 15+00 ~ KENSINGTON HILL WAY. 1 . ,227 SF
~,F 1 7 2,,220 S.F• ~ \ SIDEWALK' ~
' ~ , 20,040 S.F. ~ i C OLD POND ,AREA . .12,569 SF
5 i 16 160 LF
f ~ 26,405 S.F, ~ ,9,So6 S.F. 15 LOT FILLS
\ / 19,734 S.F. SITE ~ 6
\ k _ T ~ TRIANGLE y 1 22,443 S.F. / K ; ~ D LOT 3 . , 9,026 SF
~ 9 s 0,0 , S.F. 21
6 1 _ / c~ _ 22 r / ~ 24,014 S.F. E LOT 78. .5,276 5F
24,181 S.F. ~ p ~ 20,144 S.F, r -
2 3 \ 13 ~ / / 2o,ss, s.F, u NOW OR FORMERLY F LOT 79. • 2,188 SF
65 ~ WINDSOR OAKS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
\ 24 HOMEOW V \ ~ 9 ' a 20,295 S.F. \ 21,086 S.F. ~a'' ~ MB 1984 PG 1591
v, -7 u ZONE 2 5 , u, ZONED R-40W WAKE COUNTY NOTE:
' / - .o \ , . - 21,018 S.F. 1 2 22,484 S.F. • AVE sINGLE FAMILY NEUSE RIVER BUFFER SH W AVE. LOT SIZE-12,023 SF 0 N SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION
~ 19 843 S.F. BY NCDENR-DWG.
\ ~ 26 / o~ \ 0 21,177 S.F. ~ G \ U
\ / ~ t 6 4
\ ~ \ 20,617 S.F, ~ P
8 \ 3 4 27 / 20,,64 S.F. IIJ_ 19,177 S.F. 3 3
° 11 20133 S.R. HANK IMPA T S
' 18,242 S.F. SIDEWALK I~'- \ ~V 19,745 S.F. ~ ~ ~ P. \ /
\ r - L ~ ~ O \ 63 ROADWAY CROSS.
\ - \ ~ 20,854 S.F. 32 ,F
\ / 9 25 462 S.F, _
20,810 S.F. 1 ~ Q 0 _ 35 C OLD POND AREA , .385 LF r
, F 31 q 8,817 S.. 18,752 S.F, i
28 4 F 26,0 6 S.. \ 32 640 S.F. 3 0 ~ ` NOTE:
~ 'gas ' 1 6 \ 29 v ~ \ J 21,744 S.F. Now oR FORMERLY THIS CHANNEL IMPA T I
4'~ m \ 20,139 S.F. ~ ` - 8 S.F. J01 V JOHN & CAROL SMITH C S CONTAINED COMPLETELY
I WAKE couNTY P.I.N. WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DRAINED POND BED.
- 3 6 ~ F \ - Z ~ 20,133 S.. / HAS , I 20,743 _ 0761.03-04-2159 ZONED R-12 (VACANT)
/ / ~ FUTUR FUTURE PHASE OF FERNWOOD
SUBDIVISION
/ 61 46 / / 20,494 S.F,
23,049 S.F. \ s,. , / \
37 44 ~ \ _ 11 J 4„ 42 41 ~ 26,,97 S.F. ro
40 3 9 - ~ 25,922 S.F, lg 760 S.F, 19,889 S F. 19,667 S.F. 19 445 S.F. 1 F ~ - - , 9,387 S.. 2,116 S.F,
51 o \ ~
PROP 5' ~ , \ CONCR \ 6 O 3 a
4 7 a - J L_ _ ~ '0 ~ - - ~ 25 915 S.F. N o~ N
22,687 S.F. v _ - --°i- \ \a 7 V r
r N 23 t--•- ~nf - ~ ~ \ \ n
a D,l 1 \ \
' ~ r 1 110,1' '.10• 110.. J~' e ~ 00 0
R=36.5' - - ~ NHAL - \ \ I so R -1 59
\ ~ wETLANt ti 36,037 S.F. WETLANDS r''.
48 5 50 ~ ~ . N 30 890 S.F. 51 ~ 51 ~ ~ ~ 5 8 ,.r; i ~
53 54 ,9„D S.F. 55 57 ' _ 5 6 Q 49 r 4 , 18,217 S•F• 18,150 S.F. 18,150 S.F. 18,150 S.F, 18,150 S.F, 21,056 S•F, ~ r 19,434 S.F, 2 ,6 2 S.F. ~ ~,i ~
N 19,443 S.F. ~ • ' i ~~1~ ~r ~
G R ,r , ~ APHIC SCALE i ~
~ - - - - ~ J r _J L >r ~ - - , ~ ~ ioo o so ~o0 20o aoo
c ~ NOVV OR FORMERLY NOW OR FORMERLY Nas'22'at'w ~sla•~t'
DANBURY SUBDIVISION DANBURY SUBDIVISION
a ZONED R-1000 (SINGLE FAMILY ( IN FEET )
1- DIIF I (1T CI7F.17 'i99 CF
i inca = iuu it.
r
Revisions WITHERS & RAVENEL En meerin & Surveying, Inc.
C 9 9 No. Description, Date B KENSINGTON @ REGENCY / EDrawn Scale CAD File 1"=100' SHTWI.DWG
111 MocKenon Drive Carl, N.C. 27511 A LOT REVISIONS BY OWNER 47-16-79-8 GAS B REVISIONS BY OWNER 6 4 98 GAS _ WETLANDS PERMITTING MAP Dote Sheet No. 4/16/98
co [m PHASES I WITHERS k IV 919-489-3340 FAX [phone] REVISIONS Y S&EQ y Job No.
Y 96167 of

~~r
I / /
P NNY ROAD SHALL BE WIDENED ArR~SS , I I ~ / / E J , / -
FRONTAGE OF THIS PROPERTY TO ~ NE-HALF , J ~ / 1
OF 53 8B & 78 R/W PER TOWN F ~ , ~ r ~
P N. ' ' / THOROUGHFARE LA , ~ ~
/ rr i r / rr- r COMMON OPEN SPACE i i ~ / ± r r
Y HOMEOWNERS ~ ! \ ~ ~~\tJJ f MAINTAINED B , . \
ASSOCIATION (0.81 ACRES) , i I - ~ ; J \ r ..,,.-~i
. \ I I ~ rr rr r r
' STREETSCAPE / ~ + r i r 30 EXISTING HOUSE f r ~ , 1 , r r ,
UFFER. MINIMUM r ~ ~ / 1 1 + \ r r B & OTHER STRUCTURES \ I1 < r r i
CANOPY TREES / , / I I + I OF ~ 70 BE REMOVED ~ / / I I r I i
EVERY 40 , 2.5 ' ~ ;'r I \ ~ , CALIPER AT PLANTING / ` `
' \ / ' III I ,,,r+'»»`\`\\`~\ \ r I -4 Y 4,y ~ i i
R, / / I I ~ 21,8$'1 S.F. j ~ + j °e ' ? r t i
50~ BUILDING ERA' ' / I i i i l i ' ~I `v +
0~ r / - III , +?y~ 1.11' SETBACK FROM , ~ J / _ I ? ~ I I I + I ~ r i i
PENNY ROAD i \ / / I •C "T 1 ? i I i i ~ ~ i', a i / Y ~ ~ 11 f l jilt ~ 1ii I r i ~ i
V`'' r \ ? I 1 1 i 1j1 ` 1 1 1 1 1 1Ir I r r
',,,y , ~ 7 'h\, III \ I l r III , W ~ ! / i i ? ' //i'I 1111 I 4 II , I
/ ~i9` J / J 111 ' III 1 ~P r r l r 2,410 S.F. III tr-__ ~ rr, I II ' I / t
? ~ ~ ? 1 V I , r 1 1 r ' 1~~ ` / ~ , i III ? ~ I l i r r r I r i
~ r I V I ` J tl e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / / ~ 1j1 r' / 11 1!!I 1 II ~ ~ r r 22,16 S.F / 1 1 1 J/ r 1 1 i t
/ ~ ~ / rr ~ < I I ' / ~ / i Iii ~ ' I ' '
~ t , / ~ ? ~6,595r S.Fr
i
y % r /f ! r r ~ / r r I I
? / ! / / / ! r f ! ! ~ i`r r / I
rr 1 / r.J f ! / / lilt / / r ~ r r / / 1 l ~ ~ / 1 /
~ I i r f / / Qi r r / ~ ; 31,483,5.F. r F / \t .
r fr I l ~ , J i j / r-, r r / % yJ / / / / ~ / t / / /
' ' ' / 3,626 ~4.F. , / / / ~ ,'~'9''% r ! i / j ' / , / / / / I ,,a , r , ~ , r / / t 37,091 S.F. 71 ,
? r rr ~ , y'" ? r ` 41364 S.F. J ' ~
- - 7 ,
/ I J -..L / X79 S.F.
I ING r / r II / / r • . V /
TREE LINE I y ~ ' r r' r'' i 11 i ' I ~ i /
? '
/ _ / _ / r ~ 26,653 5 , / r . /
/ / , ,r r • , t' . RNER \ / ~ . 223,3 .F. ~ p
r ? BUFFER J
r - '4117 ? z 9 , J t J I
/ / . , ~ ~ ,0,29 .F.,/ r / / r , ~ ' i '.9'
/ I / 23,408 ~.f. / r / /
t / ~ S~.TII~
r / / I r 3 , / / V / . , 485 SF
i J / a 22,869 S.F. r P• ; ; ' EXISTING 1 ~ , ~ ~ J J 26~ S . t / ( A SANITARY SEWER CROSSING. EXISTING
~ ~ \ , , \ I TREE u N 20 LF TREE u E
, / ! / i J / ' ? r
R Y i J ~ / ' ` 19,399 SF,,~ % t ~ NOW OR FORME L , J J ~ / t , / / ? I
DANBURY SUBDIVISION ,r J s ' / 11 I ROADWAY CROSSINGS
ZONED R-1000 (SINGLE Y)~, J , ~ ` ~ . ~ / 1 i F . .12,569 S C OLD POND AREA
T IZE=13 700 SF ~ nvE. LOS ~ _ 671 ? - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ 27171 ~F. 130 LF
~ 3 S.F 0 ~ 19,587 S. t~ 20-'~ ~ ? 6 SF
~ ' ~ CON ETE ~ ..--2T"Z2~~S.F. 7 ~ ; WAY EMBANKMENT LOT 78. 30 C ROAD
I 4 S.F. r I r - 20' 0 i
? ~ - i t r ~ .16
r 1 26,405 S.F. ~
' ) ' ~ 1 Z34 S F. \ SITE , r / / ~ --,1 ~ 'iRT~CNGLE 22•+43 S.. ~ SF . .5,276 E LOT 7&
4 ` ,
! ~ J r tr 71 S.F. 1 t ~ ~ .2,188 SF F LOT 79
, / ~ , ~ 24,0'14 S.F. J r ~ /
I'J \ x'24,181 SyE , - ~ ` ? ~ 3 , , NOW OR Ff NOW OR FORMERLY
; , ` ~ ? ; ` ~ ` - WINDSOR WINDSOR OAKS N TE: 0
ti r \ L .1! WNERS AS' y ,.r / ~ 20,0 SrF. r ~ ~ , - HOMED / ~ r \ ? 4 / 48.9• ~ ~ 20,295 S.F. - 4 I EOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. CT TO VERIFICATION NEUSE RIVER BUFFER SHOWN SUBJE
~ ~ J / \ \ ? ~ \ MB 198 , _ _ / - / J i ~ 21,+x,86 S.F. \\ZONED R-40W _ _ _ MB 1984 PG 1591 - ZONED R-40W WAKE COUNTY Y NCDENR-DWQ. 6
/ ~ , r \ SINGLE I SINGLE FAMILY
~r ?r 'r~~" / _ r ~ I \ Y1VE. LOT SIZE Y~VE. LOT SIZE=12,023 SF
' J 6 / r ` I 1[2,48 S.F. i i
2 x _ I ~ ~ 64 / i / \ ! 1,1'7 ~.F. / / i
r ; . S / \ 1 1 I 1 / ,r' 20,61~,.i;.F. / ~ , ti 1
r _ I 34 T P
j ' i ? I 20,16 , ,
r 7 2 3 r ,17h .F. ; , - ' ~ . SID ALK ~ ~ ~ / ~ 1, 20.133' S. . S.F.
i ' i / ' / ~ ,42 / ~ 745 S.F. ~ Bo
3, 6
~ J.. ~ \t ~ / r 20,8 S.F. AREA . .130 LF C OLD POND
? / / / ~ 1+i ~ ~ 1 / .i / i \ ` 25,462 S.F. ~
% 18,817/S.F. ' ? ,752 S.F, , ~
\ \ ,3 Q NOW OR NOW OR FORMERLY
, 32,640 S.F{? ~ t `r - - - \ I ~ ~ 21,744 S.F. ~ r r S. JOHN & CJ JOHN & CAROL SMITH
• \ I 2 139 $F. i i r / i r 5.--~' WAKE COl ' WAKE COUNTY P.LN.
\ 6 0761.03-04-2159
` ` ` i r 3 ~ ' ~ ' ~ ONED R-' ~ I r / ~ Z ZONED R-12 (VACANT)
/ / ~ ? 20133 S.F. HAS ~ I . r Ftlrlmt P FUTIHtt PHASE OF FERNWOOD
SUBDNISION
r' r ' 23;09 S.F. ? r t i ~ i 1 J~ / % / a~~' ~ ' i i ~
l~L~ I , , 26 97 ~F. J r i '
4 0 \ 43 J , r / ~ 25,922 S.F. 18,760 S.F.? 19,88 S.F. r 19,667 ~.F. f 19,445 S.Fr 19,38 S.F. ,1165.F.1 r / / / -
1 ? ' 1 r r r / r / J ' r / ' t I ~ r / , , ~ / J J r ~
, / ~ , / / i i/ r J 25 15 S.F. N . / 47J - , , , , ~
r / 22,68 S.F. , / / ~ i~ ~ / J ~ ! ~
i / r Jr f' ~ ~ ~ , r / ~ r - ~ J / / / + i
i t
~TtAI~IDS
r r 60 ? I ? ? r J J l i i ' . i ' / / / i x36,037 S.. , I i
i , r 8 r - J I / + . r r fr / , , / ~ J, ~ r / I
1 o , ? I 1 t 1 r 7 / I / J 5 n n r n n 4 n y~'~ / / f t 2 3 1 I _ 51 a _ . GRAPHIC SCALE .
J 0,890 S.F.r , 19,110 S.F. r r r ~ r / / J •F• ,612 S.F~ ; / I I ~ r r J / 19,434r~ ~ r ? ~ ~ / 49 18 217 S.Ft 18150 sF. 1 ,150 S.. 1 ,15a S.. 48, S.E. X1,0 ,S.F. , , I 1 I, 100 ~ 50 too 200
' r• I + 443 S.F. r J , r r / 1 ~ / J / ~ ' ~ . _ i I /
1 ~ ~ t\ / r r ~ 1 + rJ % Jr I r / JJ J lJ l I' I /r? ' . / / / I j % 1 i ! j ' 1 / rf ~ J r J j ~ ...,r' ( r/ I ~ ! / r I ~ 44 J / ~i~•
, \ ! I / ~ (IN FEET )
? \ ~ » NOW 0 FORME Y / 22'A ~ r-:..,,_r1 ~ , ~ ~ , , r 1 ~ /t„/ ..r r/ ~ i r\-„a' I I I ~.IN F K~ RLY \ I , ! . t, / _q / r i / ' ; ? r ~ 1 inch = 1 ff»
, , ~ ~ _ _ t!, c r".~,,,,n ci io nclnt~ r _ , r r r-, A ! _ / ~ .?Pr r / / ~
rWRY SUBQM UHINDUIYI QVD inawy. ',i / r v V i j / )
r r ZONED R-1000 SINGLE bMILY / ! t t I . r~, , Ate, LOT SIZE- 123 SF
EC 1"=100' SHTWI.DI
y Date Sheet No.
EChosickedd Scale CAD File WETLANDS PERMITTING MAP AS 4 _16/98
WlIHERS & RAVENEI Engineering & Surveying.. Inc. No. Descri tion Date OJEC A LU L REV15ION5 gX QWNER A/16/0 KENSINGTON @ REGENCY W1 of FC 9616 7
111 MacKenan Drlve 6ary, NI,CI' 17511
FID evisions 919-469-3340 FAX [phone] PHASES I IV N k AV N REVISIONS PER NCDENR-DWQ 9 30 98 IL By Job No,

WI N ACROSS ~ ~ ~ PENNY ROAD SHALL BE DE ED ~ ~
- A F ~ ~i~ FRONTAGE OF THIS PROPERTY TO ONE H L i ~ / ~
OF 53'66 & 78' R/W PER TOWN OF CARY ~ ; - ~ ~ THOROUGHFARE PLAN. ~ j' / ~ ~
i j~~ i ~ ~
COMMON OPEN SPACE
MAINTAINED BY HOMEOWNERS ~ ~ ~ ~
ASSOCIATION (0.81 ACRES) ~ ~ / ~ ;o;~ ~
/ i- 30~ STREETSCAPE XI TING HOUSE X'~
ES ~ BUFFER. MINIMUM
& OTHER STRUCTURES ~ / ~ ~ OF CANOPY TREES j „ TO BE REMOVED ~ /
EVERY 40 , 2.5 ~ ~
A IPER AT PLANTING ~ / C L g,,~ / 13~ . ~
85 o ~ ~
pR• 3~ ; 21,881 S.F.
' BUILDING R~~~ ~ 50 Eon ,e,~° ~ _ - SETBACK FROM , ~o = ~ ~ ' ~ -
PENNY ROAD ~ / - ~ / -
~ ti R, / / /
~ / P~~ ~ p0
~ OqF ~ ~ ~ ~ 41 F. 1~ ~ ~ 29, 0 S.
/ B i 83
~ oo ` ~ ^ R'=4O ~ ~a oy ~ j ~9 22,106 S.F. /
/ S ~ ~ / ~ V'~t~r139 ~ `
a 82
/ i s~ ~ . 26,595 S. F. i~ ~ ~
Q ~ ~ i~ o n~ ~y i ~
R i
i Nb .66 ~ / i ~ ~ ~ 1 i i z, / 8 eT % • ~ Sb~ fit. ,,F`~
~l , 31,483 S.F. / i ~ ~ c• ~ / / ~ ~ ~
LCD _ il ' ~ \ - - 80 29,441 S.'~. J
M1+' H i ~J ~ / 2 ~ , ~a~?a- - 32,626 S.F. ~ . i V ~ ~ CH N % -
/ _ _ I i 37,091 S.F. ~ 1
~0'0~ / i~ ~ 41 4 F - L. WET ; ~ ~ ,36 s. . l~) i
~70 . ~ P. / 7 EXISTING ~ . _ S ; ~ /
~ R _ 27,9 s.F. TREE LINE Z , ~ ' / / N N
2 • 27,487 S.F. ~ ! ~ i 0' ~ /
z g w . 74
,F. ~ I ~ ; ~ ~ a~ ~ /r~ ~ ~ 26,653 S.F. 7 ~ . 1 0 3
vvovvd ~ / n EN C IV 28,397 S.F. - N R ER o n N
~ -1 F IMPACT BA BUFFER O h
NEW CHANNEL 7 5 ~ ° WETLANDS IMPACTS
iv ° i / i~• 24,117 S.F. \ l i ~ 69
BEGIN CHANNEL 45, ~;d• ~ ; - ' ~ P• . L 6 20,292 S.F.
IMPACT vvvvvv ?vvv v•• ~ ~'r 23,408 S. F, ~ \ nvv •vtvv v
vv vvvv n 1 id••' ' - ~ APPROXIMAT ~
i 77 • dvv • TREE LINE ~ 3 'R UTILITY RELATED
...v 22,869 S.F, p. 6 ~ ~ ~vvvv vvo . ~ ~ev... _ E) EXISTING A SANITARY SEWER CROSSING. .485 SF
CHANNEL ` : ° ~~9 26,s 3 .F. / TF TREE LINE
19 / ~ •vvvvvv ~ vvvvvv ~ / / 20 LF
NOW OR FORMERLY 19,399 S.F.
(VISION / / ~ ~ ~ / / DANBURY SUBD a ZONED R-1000 SINGLE FAMILY ~ `y, /
( ) / ~ AVE. LOT SIZE=13,700 SF / ~ ROADWAY CROSSI~
18 ~ 67 3 90 S.F 30'R p 19,587 S. ~ 27,171 S.F. B STA. 15+00 ~ KENSINGTON HILL WAY. .1,227 SF
np. ~0 OSE 2O ,
• ~L O. CONCRETE 21 220 S.F. ~ ~ ~ SIDEWALK ~ C OLD POND AREA . .12,569 SF
' ~ 20,040 S. F. ~ ~ ~ . ~ i 160 LF
~ \ 16 , ~
~ ~ 26,405 S.F. ~ ~ ~ 19,566 S.F. i 15 ~ LOT FILLS
~ SITE ~ 6 6 f 19,734 S.F.
~ • \ TRIANGLE 22,443 s.F. r y / D LOT 3 . , 9,026 SF
14 ~ 9 , \ / 21 _ V tr 0 071 S.F.
~ 22 r 6 / 4 14 F / 2 ,0 S. . E LOT 78. .5,276 SF
24,181 S.F. ~ Q ~ 20,144 S.F. s. - 2 3 NDW NOW OR FORMERLY F LOT 79. ~ ~ ~ ~ .2,188 SF
~ 13 / ~ / 20,661 .,.F. ~ WIN WINDSOR OAKS
~ \ ~ 20,066 S.F. °r ~ - 65 24 ~ . HOMEOWNER HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
\ V ~ Qea' 20,295 S.F. 21,086 S.F. MB MB 1984 PG 1591 NOTE:
\ ~ - - ZONED R 7 25 ~ o~,~ SI ZONED R-40W WAKE COUNTY sINCLE FAMILY NEUSE RIVER BUFFER SHOWN SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION
o ~ ~ ` ' - ~ AVE. LO 21,018 S.F. 1 2 22,484 S.F. AVE. LOT SIZE=12,023 SF
v.r - m 19,843 S.F. 26 z \ ~ G~ - BY NCDENR-DWc~.
\ 21,177 S.F. o ~ 64
\ / ~ \ / \ ~l ~ 20,617 S.F.
\ P ~ 3 4
8 I~ 7 / 20,164 S.F. 2 C~IANNEL IMPACTS
19,177 S.F. 3 3 1 1 zo 133 s.F. SIDEWALK S'€-
\ 41 19,745 S.F. ~ ~0 ~ 8' P, / ~
\ \ r o 6 3 \ - ROADWAY CROSS111~GS
\ \ 20,854 S.F.
\ / 9 ~ 25,462 S.F. / - - Q C OLD POND AREA . .385 LF
20,810 S.F. 1 0 35
~1 31 - - A 18,817 S.F. 18,752 S.F. ~p~ 28 26,D46 S.F.
"~fl ' \ 32,640 S.F. 6 ~ N N NOTE:
~'<.u \ 2 ;J 1 744 .F. C ~ \ J 2 , s , a s.F. JOHN NOW OR FORMERLY THIS CHANNEL IMPACT IS CONTAINED COMPLETELY JOHN & CAROL SMITH
a~4 N \ 20,139 S.F. ~ WAK WAKE couNrY P.LN. WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DRAINED POND BED.
07E 0761.03-D4-2159
45 _ 36 - ZONE( ~ 'as 20,133 S.F. / PHAS I 20,743 . . ZONED R-12 (VACANT)
/ , FUTURE PI FUTURE PHASE OF FERNWOOD
/ - - c - P I~-- 61 SUBDIVISION
/ / 4 6 - , i 20 494 S.F.
23,049 S.F. ~ ~ / 37 a
~ _ -1 - 44 ~ 43 42 41 40 26,197 S.F. N
39 - 25,922 S.F. 18,760 S.F. 19,889 S.F. 19,667 S. F. 19,445 S,F, 19,387 S.F. 4 2,116 S.F. ~ -
- / 5q r , n: ~ \
PROP 5' / , CONCR \ ~ O ,3
~ ~ 4 7 ,m o - - cin~ 1____ , F ry •p 25,9 5 S..
22,687 S.F. v N \ o
_ ~ , 3 ° ac ~ - 3':°}~~
I/ J~ ~ 110.1' ttQ' 110' 11n
CD / 9~
m R=36.5' - - N++AL - - ~ I~ I- 5 9 60 R -I I ~ I r WETLANDS I WETLANDS
36,037 S.F ~
48 5 ~ 50 ~ , N ~ ~ ~ 58 i .~1 %'i ~
3D,E39D S.F. ~ 51 ~ 5 2 5 3 5 4 ~ 5 7 ,911D S. F. 55 _ 56 4 J F 1 150 S.F. 24,612 S.F, 18,217 S.. 8, 18,150 S.F. 18,150 S,F, 18,150 S.F. 21,056 S.F. 19,434 S. F. ~ .S
cu 19,443 S.F. j , ~ GRAPHIC SCALE
__~L__ L I II ~ ~ 0 50 20D 400
J ~ - J L~ ~ L_ - ~
~ NOW OR FORMERLY NOW OR FORMERLY N89'22'41"w 1614.11' ~
g DANBURY SUBDIVISION DANBURY SUBDIVISION ( [N FEET )
_ inn u
3 LUNLU K- I UUU ~Z) NULL rAM LT)
AVE. LOT SIZE=12 322 SF u~ /
r Designer Scale CAD File
Revisions ERS & RAVENEL Engineering & Surve in , Inc. WITH Y 9 No. Description Date j JEC 1"=100' SHTWI.DWG
/ KENSINGTON @ REGENCY WETLANDS PERMITTING MAP Drawn By Date Sheet No. GAS 4/16/98
111 MacKenan Drive Cary, N. C. 27511 A LOT REVISIONS BY OWNER 4 16 98 B REVISIONS BY OWNER 6/4/98 PHASES I _ Checked By Job No.
WITHER S & RAENEL 919-469-3340 FAX [phone] REVISION Y S&EC 6 2 98 y JEC 96167 of