20191457 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20191022

DR
02*10n of Water R"Ourc"
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance into the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
Version#*
20191457
1
Is a payment required for this project?*
* No payment required
What amout is owed?*
* Fee received
r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Washington Regional Office - [phone] Robert Tankard:eads\rbtankard
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
MLV3
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Sanu Odugbesan
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
10/22/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Jady Branch
Basin
Chowan
Water Classification
C; NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
36.457055
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Gates
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-76.854158
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
P Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r- Regional General Permit (RGP)
r- Standard (IP)
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r' Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
P 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
12 - Utility Lines
le. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - E)iress
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r- No
19. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r' No
1i. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r- Yes r No r Unknown
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
r Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
James Earl Taylor
2b. Deed book and page no.:
book 324 page 705
2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
Street Address
80 US Highway 13
Address Line 2
City
Hall Township
Postal / Zip Code
27935
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
............... ....................................
State / F (mince / Fbgion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r No
r'Yes rNo
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)

3a. Name:
Sanu Odugbesan
3b. Business Name:
Piedmont Natural Gas / Duke Energy
3c.Address
Street Address
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Address Line 2
city
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28233
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Sara Duquette
4b. Business Name:
Pond and Company
4c.Address
Street Address
3500 Parkway Lane
Address Line 2
Suite 500
city
Peachtree Corners
Postal / Zip Code
30092
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Agent Authorization - MLV3.pdf
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/town:
Gatesville
2. Project Identification
State / Province / legion
NC
(buntry
USA
3e. Fax Number:
State / Province / legion
GA
(buntry
USA
4e. Fax Number:
2a. Property Identification Number:
2b. Property size:
6939121101000
0.8
2c. Project Address
Street Address
80 US Hwy 13
Address Line 2
Oty
State / Province / fegm
Hall Township
NC
Postal / Zip (ode
Country
USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
15.83KB

Jady Branch
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C; NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Chowan
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030102030205
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
This project area is a maintained pipeline pump station, which comprises a fenced gravel pad surrounding a natural gas main line valve (MLV) and is bordered by a mixed -age pine -
hardwood forest The surrounding land use is primarily managed pine forestry operations.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Fig1 USGS topo.pdf
883.41 KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
MLV3 -Soils Map.pdf 3.11 MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.82
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
0
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
PNG's existing system requires improvements to infrastructure to meet current federal and integrity standards. Installation of a launcher/receiver set is needed at the existing mainline
valve (MLV) station to allow for in -line tool inspections through existing pipelines.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Work to be performed includes the addition of pig launcher and receiver skids to allow for service at start and end points for internal pipeline inspection. The pig launcher and receiver
skids will be installed at existing maintained mainline valve (MLV) station. Specifically, the area surrounding the pipeline will be excavated to create a work area trench, which will be
reinforced with risers to ensure worker safety. The new pig launcher and receiver will be constructed and tapped into the existing pipeline infrastructure. Equipment involved in the
construction activities may include but is not limited to the typical construction equipment such as track hoes, excavators, bulldozers, trenchers, dump trucks, and work trucks. The use
of timber mats and erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented during and following project construction activities.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
MLV3_Site Plan.pdf 1.09MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the propertyor proposed impact areas?*
G Yes r No r Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved G Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Sara Duquette
Agency/Consultant Company: Pond and Company
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
MLV3_JD Request20190924.pdf 5.17MB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?

D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
)7 Wetlands r Streams -tributaries
r Open Waters r— Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
❑ Buffers
!a. Site #* (') 2a1 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type * (?) f�e of W. * 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested* 2f. Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area*
f
::7Fill:7 P Bottomland Hardwood Forest WS Yes Corps 0.450
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.450
2h. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.450
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Preliminary environmental surveys were conducted in the conceptual phase of this project and included field delineations of the project area and
immediate vicinity. Field delineations identified all water resources of the US and were provided for project planning.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Erosion and Sediment control measures Will be implemented to minimize impacts during construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r: Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
r DWR W Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
P Mitigation bank r Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
The Great Dismal Swamp Restoration Bank, LLC
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Quantity.
Non -riparian wetland
Attach Receipt and/or letter
3c. Comments
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:

The proposed project is not located within any of the six watershed / river basins subject to NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules. In addition, the proposed project will not result in
permanent ditches, piping, or channelization that would convey water in a concentrated or otherwise non -diffuse pattern. During construction soil erosion and sedimentation measures
will be implemented to disperse and concentrated flow in a diffuse pattern. Following construction activities, the area will be returned to pre-existing contours and the area will be seeded
to reestablish vegetation.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project will not result in future development that will impact downstream water quality. The pipeline retrofit project will result in minimal
disturbance and takes place on an existing, maintained right-of-way. Additional impacts are not anticipated.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
C Yes r No
59. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
r Unknown
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
US Fish and Wildlife Service, Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) Official Species List for Gates County, North Carolina
Consultation Documentation Upload

IPaC_ Gates Co.pdf 330.04KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Habitat Conservation, National Marine Fisheries Service, Essential Fish Habitat Mapper v3.0
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
North Carolina State Preservation Office (SHPO) and the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) databases
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Be. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA FIRM panel 3720692800J
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Line 208 MLV 3 Taylor Exhibit REV.pdf
Signature
fJ By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
1.77MB
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Sara Duquette
Signature
asatw. �rza
Date
10/22/2019

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Project Location: MLV3 -Gates County
Please print:
Property Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted project easement, do hereby authorize
Sara Duquette Pond & Co
of
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than above):
4720 Piedmont Row Drive, Charlotte, NC 28210
Telephone: [phone]
I hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of my knowledge.
Sanu Odugbesan, Engineering Project Manager
Authorized Property Owner (Printed) Authorized Signature
Date: D asn�lo l`

OX MAP
Wetland 549
Permanent Waters
Easement
Jurisdictional
Temporary Ditch
Work Space
Wetland
Service Layer Credits: Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
P000 e 95 190 Feet
t 11 11
0 30 60 Meters
Figure 1 - MLV3
USGS Topographic Map
Line 208 - Retrofit
Gates County, North Carolina
August 2019

Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS,
USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
Figure 4 - MLV3
NRCS Soil Survey Map
0 75 150 Feet Line 208 - Retrofit
PONIOe Gates County, North Carolina
September 2019
0 25 50 Meters

GENERAL SHEET NOTES
75
Q
O
O
m
O
CV
N
CV
O
00
CV
O
O
O
O
00
O
CV
U
z
0
z
a
0
0
ti
0
rn
LL
ROAD C
----- 15" RCP
I NV.OUT=35.4' — — — —
EX. GRAVEL
HIGHWAY 158
EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY
--38---
1
2
3
15" RCP 5
INV.IN=36.2' 4 6
-LUU LJ
— - __-------- — ��----G3$-- -- -- LINE 208 10"
a- — _71"D — INE 2 8 10
uc20-- ,I ---
CIIVE8�2"� + +* r +* + y +*y* ► �—�"'`__— ,,:� __ L/c, _ _\ — \- — — — —_—�—p �—��O�— ��/ /—,^ fx ^,Mi �(�Yi�i, -�' -.�\ *a*+ * + a++ + ++ *+++ ray*r+ a+ +r++**r+ *+ya *a++*+ +r*+* *+ +*+ asy**+ *++* a+* +a+a*a++ ++sy *aa+*+*+ yr*r +*+ll+1ra�`� aa***+ +* r++r++Y'a r+y y� r♦ +�++at*a+ r++s a+y ay +*+*+ �� + +*+rrar+ a ++ +*"* *r�a+* a+a++ sy r+* + -*r�a*++ r *r al+*�y* *+rr a++s a+ * raa +ryy* +/ + � •:� / * * ++ r+ * r *tl+''* r. ayaya+r + ++ ya+*+ a yaU
y
+yy
ya +r
+*+*++
*+y+y
ar*+
a++*
+*+
*++
ra++
+-
+y
c
2
+*+y UC Uc�+a*++
+ +F+
* + * +
+ +a*+ +
* *a+ aa+*r++ a * y +y+
+ a +*+ 3
+ 8
PIN:6939205922000 PIN: 6939121101000 +y
* r
a+ a**a**+ PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS ra **+ +++BENNETT WATSON C. ROBERTS a rryay*y
**++++yy**yy
*±12nRISER + ya*DB 143 PG 203 COMPANY, INC. ++++ +a + ++ *+y++* r+y
a *+yDB 199, PG 680 *a** + ay
a + +++ * +y
** *+** +a+ + �y+y++ +a2092000 +
+7 PIN: 6939*
�
+ * r + + +
+ +a +a *a s ra +a +a *a " + a *+ * * * *+ a *+ %
a
*a+**+ayy**++**a ayy*ray**a +** 10 RISER y ` at BENNETT WATSON C. ROBERTS
+ y a y r + y y + \ r*y a ++r+* ay*y * *+aa+ ay* +++a+ * r * *+a y+ + + +a+*ry* ++*aDB 143 PG * + a * + ++*+r+ ya*+y y* *+ a * +
+r +
a
+ + +*++r+ **+ +*+ *++ +r *++ *+la+++r +* =+ *a+ ** ** +*+ + +*+ ** *y++**++*aa *+ y * *++r +*+ y y yy *+ +a + * **+
+a+r y *a+r ** yy
y*yyy + *+
+ay* * +* y++y+y+yr ++
+*++
+
a++ar++++ y +y +
++ + * ++ ++* +
++ay +y++ +* y*r *+ +*
y ++ +
y+** + +*+
y + y * ++
*+
y
r
y + * + * r * + + * * + * + + y r y a y + + y +
* + * + ++ *r + * +* a *++ yaa *+ ++*+ a *+y+r a+ *+ r+*aa* a ay+ + ++ +* +* +* ar *+ *r * +y+ a + *y+** + y+*+ *++ r ya *+* +* *y+ *+* a y*+* *aya+ +a *r + * y*+y * * a*+ *+ r+ + +* +* ar y+ +* * * + ay * + ++ *+* +*+ * *+*+
r y+ a + ** + a yr +** ay*+ *+ a y*+* * +yar+ *r a +*++ ayay'+ a_�"` + +* a* r* *+r a ** ®a y*+a a ++ a +a * *a
* * a a*y+a
+*+ay+yy+y+
**+*yFF+ ++ +* +* +a + + +
+ * * *r *++ + *
+ + + y yy *+ +*+++
a
*+ r
+r
y+
+
a + + + +
* r y* + *+ y* y* a y* r y* a'+ may* *
**aa +*ra aa +++ *++a *++a **ra *++a +++a * + ay+ r*+ ++r +*++ **+++r ++raraaa**+*+*a*y*++ +a+++ya** * +y+yaay+ y ** araa+**+*yya++ay+r * *y;yr*+ *y+yyr+yr�+a +ya+*y++ + ++ *+++ a **++*. a++y+ + ;a++r **.+ ryr*+y*+ yy ++a+** ++y y* y*a.* +* *+ yay+++ry* yra*ay*y a*aa+* * y+*+yar+aa *+;*ayay * *+ y+y+yy +y +r *+yya y*+ +*++± a* *+++r+*a*++ ++±r ++ + "+ +*++++ y + ** +a*+* y+ *ayaaa+ *+ a+y+*+* +ay a+y"*+ a+Ea+y+a*ya ++yr *7y;*yr **Fy**y+a ++ + sa♦++ar*+++a+a*.+*ra+* a*+++*aa+a+*y * a+r+ry ya.+y+y*+*+y * y**aay* *y yaaar*ya+y++y*++y;y+y+**y +a♦ya+r+++++a+*.a+ ;+++♦a *ar* +a+* y +y*a* +y+* ay+a++ + a+aa+*ya+y+,*y+y*+*ay r r++yaa++++ *++*a* + ++a++ +Aar + *+a+y+a.y+a **+y ** +yaya** aa+y*++y **y,yr*y* ya+ +++ *++++ **yr+ ++** + r*+*y �a** y*a.a*y *+++ yt*+ + .aar *y+yy;*a*y*y+ay * ♦a+*++++ayaa*y+ ,r++*+*++* +y a**a .yaaa+y*+*+y+y* +a.a y++yr* ;*r**y*ya+ + a+ay++ra*'a++* a*+** *++* *y a*+ary .ray*+yy**y+ * +a+r +y++y* ++;**y**y+ya a+++a*+*y*+ +**+* * +*r+y +a * +++a++*+y+++y+a+ary+y**;*+*ya++y ♦a +++*ya+*+* +++***+a* ***+*.+*+ray**+y*y + aa.y*+*yy+ *+,+*yr+*r a+ *+++ r*++ y+*+*r**y*a+.raaa+++yy++ yy*++yy-+a+*y** a* +++* +a*+ue.*s*++**.y + r aaar ** ++y* + y+++yr +++*+++ **+*y :+** *++ ra ara+ .*y *++++a+a++**+++ya`ay** :*+ *+y +a+.+ *+++a++y+**+++++ +*+y+ :+a* *+y+++aa++* �+ ++++y +*a+r+ *'y*+*:* *++*y++ar* ++r*a a+ *+a*ya y -+*ra+* *+ **++y+++*:+a+ *+*y +* yaaa* aar* r +*++a+ y+ay +r +*+*** *y+y** +y*y:+*a*+* +y+a y arra ayr+ a * ++*+yra+y ay**++** + *y+**+ry+*t:*+*yy*y++ yr+r* ar+* a*y++aa ++ya +y *++* y+ a*+yayy*+*�tiy+* *+r +y y y y* +*+a+*r+r* ++* + ++
+* +ay ++y ++ *+*++r a*y ++Ea+rayr+++++y*a+X+*+r+ ++*y++*y*+y y++ y. *+* *y*+ *a*++r +*aay PN+ r+ y++* *ya+ +yra***G **y+++raa +*a+a+y aya* +++ *++y* a*P*'+s+ a+++*y+a*y*+++*y+RO*+*+ti *+++y* te*a+ *r+*++ +y+ +ay+P+ *y*+++y++ *+++yL**y+++a+ +E+ry+ar *a+y +yaa**+++ +a+**y RT+*y*+ ++**+ay++a+ +r+*y +Y*+ +ar+y a+ yr* +++ y ++r+y+ y *a+ ++ ++a ay+rr+ aL++ +y+**** +++r y *++r*+a*y*+I+*a++*++yy y* *N ++++*+ryy +y r y+ *+*r+y a a+ +y *y+ y + y +* +++*+ y *++++y ay a*y y+* a+ +a++++r+++a +++++yra * y++ ++r a+ *+ * +
y*r +a* y*+++ *r * aa++y
+ + +y +++y*
+ry++ y
*++a*
+yya*y+++
+ ++++*a*
+ *yaryra+
+
yr++
*
y +
++ + a+
+r +*ara
++a ay
a+*y*y*
y+y+
+ *yy*
aa*ay�
+a *
**+++
s+
±y+
++*
*
ayr
+
yy
++
*+* +*+ * +* a+1:-%+."*+++� y+y *+ a + y *1 *1 +*r
y y*+*r++*++aay*r+ay + *r* **aa ++* "yyy
* ++++* +ar
8CHAINLINKyyary*
+C+++y y +PIN:6928992140000 *
ay+ r
*+ay*ay*+ +*+r+a*
+ma+* +*JAMES EARL TAYLOR y y
+y y+y
+ + *+ +*+++DB 65, PG 174 :++ y +
*
/
/
�
_
IPF*ayya*
+
y�+pary * * ppy+ +*y +* ay+yy
%% a +. **+*ay4 a++y* +* +**+ -p�pya +* y +
*++ 8yy+a+ +ay+ y++ya* **y a ** *+ a
ar
*+y +a + + *y+�* +
++ * * ++*+
+ * 4Sa** + y\+/*+ * +
*ay + �a�++a+++*
+�
+1++ay+aa*:a+r+*** + a+y+ * a **+ + + + +,38
+ a + +* * + *+r*�r + +a+ r+ * +*+ y*+y y++ +
+ *
y++ *y + 7 ++ s +++++ *+
+ a + + * +*a *y
aa* ry
yy PIN: 6905-8 -
++yay +++y++++* y: +*+ EDWARD M. BOWSE+
*. +a+ +*+IAMS, JR
KENNETH M. WILL
HEIRS
*+* +y*
++y++.*+ELAINE P. BOWSERa
+± ++
y + *yyDB466PG 137
+y
+ y* +y++++ + r++ y + *++*+* * +a++++
++ * y a ya r*y+ + y+ +*y+ +* *+ +
+ + * +++ + * +++y ++ ++
+
a * +* ++ ++ + * ++ *+ *y
+ y+y + *+
* + +
* * ++ *+* +y +y++ + ++ + +++r*+* y + * * + a * *+y+*+ry++y +*y +a+* +ya +a++ *+a+ +a++ *a+* ++*r +y+ *++* ++y*a*+ ya++yy+* s+r r* +*++ **+ aara +*r +**+ ++y* ++r+ +y*+++ **a+ *y+ *+* + *+*y *a aa+r a** +*+* y++r +arr *+yy+++* ys++ y+*y* +*a a*a ++*+ *+r sr+* *++ ++** +ya* +++r++yy +a++ *++ yy*+y s++ *a+ y*y a** +a+ ***+ +** ++r +*+ r+yy++r*+y**y y*a++ aa +** ++a +* *aa+* r** y+* +*+ ++y *yrr *+ *a+ r*+ ra y*+ +* ** a+ar* +* *r* *+a * a++ +*++ ** *a+ a** aa y+y +* ** aa++* +* +a* ++r +++*++* yy*aa y** y* y*+ r* *** a++* ++ *+y +a *+*+ **+*+ *y*a+ y* y** y** a* *** +a++ ++ aa* *+ *+*+++y+ *yya+ y* a* ay +* **+ +r* + ay ++ **+ y+yy+ *yy* +* +* * aar* ++ +y * a+ +**++
36.�+ r **+ + y* +a y+y** + ** *r* a+r+ ** r aa+ar ++ y+ y+ *yy* ** ** *ar* +++* ++ a* +a *+a++ **+ y* y+ **yy** a+ ++ +**+* *++ +* r* *r +*+*a +*+ y+ y + **yy** r* ** **** ++* +* +* + *+a+*a * a+ +ayy** *yyya* a+ ** **++* rr+ +*+ +* + ++raar *+y y*a *++ *yy+*r ++ ** *+** +a+ **+ +* ++ a*++a+*a sy+ +*+ +*yy+y +y+ ** *+r ++ ++ *r* +a +r*++*+*y y* ++* *yy*+ ya+ ++ +*+ ++ *** a** +++r +*+*+**y+ +ya+ + *+ ***yy+r yrr **** *** +a* *y+ *** +*++ *a*+* * +y* +ay+ **+ **yy*ra aya ***+ *++* +r+ ++*++ *** y++* *a*+a+*++y *ya+ *+ *+*yya*r yr++ **+* r +** +ar* **+*+ +*+* *yr+ a*+r+r+*yy* ++y+ *++ ++ry++++ y*y+ *+** ++y* y*r+ **+++ *+*+ +ryy+ +r+**y+*+*+y *y** +++r y a++y++*+ yy*++ +*r* y+++a *yy+ +*y*+ *+ ayryr *+++y**+y
+
+ a+a * +y*y ++r* +y+++y*+++ *y+ar ++rr +y++a+ y*yyy* *+yy+ +*+++ +yyyyy +y*++y++*y* ++ry +++* ++*+*
+*ar+ +y++y ++*+a
*+sy* *yy*yy+ +y*++ +r*++
y+yyy+
+
a* + * +*** + *y ys+ * + * + +
*++y
y * *y + *
+ +
+ r * + +
+** + *+a * ++a * +
+ a +
* * + +**
+a +y+y++ + * + *+ ++
a ++ a* r+ a + + ++
+ *+
yy r + * +*
** **+
y++ yyr + +
**++ + + a * * + *y
++
++ ++y+ * *++*y+
a+r+*y
+++*y*
+++*+
a+*+r+
a++r+
y++
++++
a*
a
++
/
/
* * y + * + * + + + * * + + * * a + + * + * + + * * a * r * a
+ y * y + y + y + y + y * y + y + y * + * * * + * r * a + r * + * + * r * a + r * + * + * r * a + r * + * * + + * + * + * + + +
* y a y r y a y + y * y a y r y a y + y * + * + * + + * * + * * * + * + * * * + * * * + * + * + * + * * * + * r + + + + + + * +
+ * + y + * * y + * + + + + + * * + + * * a * + * + * + + r * a + r * + * + + r * a + r * + + + * + * + * r * + + * + y + y a y r
+ * + * + * r * a + + * + * + + r * + + * * + + y + y r y + y + y + y + y + y + y + y + y * y + y + y + y + y * y + y * y + y +
* y a y + y + y + y r y a y r y + y + y r y a y r + * * * + * + * + * + * * * + * + * + * + * * * + * * * a * + + + * + + + * +
+ y * y + y + y + y + y * y + y * y + r * + * + * * * a * r * a * + * + * a * r * a + + * + * + * r * a + + * + + + + + * + + + + * r * a + r * + * + * + * a + r * + + y + * + y a y r y + y + y + y + y r y + y * y + y + y + y + y * y + y * y + y + y * y +
+ * + * * * + * * * + * + + + * a + * r a + r + a + y + y * a + y * y a y + y * y + y * y a y + y + y a y * y a + r y y * y + y
+ y + y + y * y a y r y a y + y * y a y r y a y + + * + * + * + + * * + * * * + * + * * * + * * * + * + * + * + * * * + + + + +
+ y * y + y + y + y + y * y + y + y + + * * * + * * * a * + * + * + * r * a + r * + * + * r * a + r * + * + + + * + + r * + + *
* y + y r y + y + y * y a y r y a y + y * + a y r y a y * + * + * + * + * * * + * * * + * + * * * + * * * + * * + + + + + + * +
POND AND COMPANY Al M LV 3 OVERALL EASEMENT PLAN ^AA
7
— uc— p
8.
--�__ 9.
—__— 10
SEE SHEET PNG-C-208-0001022 FOR CIVIL GENERAL NOTES,
LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS.
THIS SHEET IS PART OF A MULTI -SHEET SET OF
CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SHALL BE READ WITH THE FULL
SET TO BEST ENSURE PROPER INTERPRETATION.
COORDINATES AND DIMENSIONS ARE TAKEN TO/FROM
CENTERLINE OF FENCE, EDGE OF PAVEMENT, CENTERLINE
OF UTILITY, EDGE OF EASEMENT, FACE OF BUILDING, UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
COORDINATES ARE BASED ON THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM
OF 1983 (NSRS11.NCF) - NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANES,
UNITS OF MEASUREMENT IS U.S. SURVEY FEET.
SEE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST EXISTING SURFACE GRADE AS
REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A CONSISTENT FINISHED SURFACE
AND ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE YARD TO OUTSIDE OF
FENCED AREA. CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE POSITIVE
DRAINAGE WITH 1% MINIMUM SLOPE. NO PONDING OF WATER
SHALL OCCUR.
ADDITIONAL AGGREGATE MATERIAL MAY BE REQUIRED TO
ENSURE GROUNDCOVER EXTENDS 2' MINIMUM BEYOND THE
FENCE LINE.
ACREAGE OF DISTURBANCE = 0.61
ACREAGE OF WETLAND IMPACT = 0.45
LINEAR FOOTAGE OF JURISDICTIONAL DITCH IMPACT = 0
O SHEET KEYNOTES
1. LIMITS OF PERMANENT EASEMENT
2. EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE AND GATE TO BE REMOVED
3. EXISTING DUKE ENERGY STATION PIPING
4. EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE TO REMAIN
5. TEMPORARY WORKSPACE EASEMENT
6. TREES WITHIN PNG PROPERTY FOR REMOVAL
7. LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.)
SHEET LEGEND
FOR DEMOLITION
EXISTING FENCE
-LOD LOD— LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.)
Y. X X 'Ax x X
'A'A'AX X x 'A
3500PARKWAYLANE, SUITE500 SCALE: 1 " = 20' 0 10, 20' 40' 60'
PEACHTREE CORNERS, GA 30092
C-1803 US 158, EURE, NC 27935
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM-1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE
DISCLOSURE ALL PREVIOUS PAPER COPIES OF THIS DRAWING MUST BE DESTROYED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECORDS & INFO. MANAGEMENT (RIM) POLICY 1001
NO. DATE REVISION(S) DESCRIPTION BY CHK APPD DESCRIPTION APPROVALS
A 02/06/2019 30% DESIGN SUBMITTAL KL KU KU AREA CODE - DATE INITIALS REGIONAL LINE 208 RETROFIT PROJECT
B 03/04/2019 60% DESIGN SUBMITTAL KL KU KU ACCOUNT NUMBER - DATE INITIALS ENGINEER P iedmont
C 10/04/2019 60% DESIGN RESUBMITTAL VL KU KU PROJECT NUMBER 3130255 MGR TECH M LV 3 OVERALL EASEMENT PLAN
DRAWING BY VL REC &STD Natural Gas
STATION ID XX-X-XX-XXX-XXXX DATE INITIALS PRINCIPAL COPYRIGHT 2015 PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CORP. NORTH CARO L I NA
PROFESSION,4LENG�,4RCHSTAMP ENGINEER CORP. OFFICE 4720 PIEDMONT ROW DRIVE TABORO & ELIZABETH CITY RESOURCE CENTER
CHECKER INITIALS KU CHARLOTTE, NC 28210
EXISTING DRIVEWAY
60% DESIGN
REF. DWG(S)
PNG-M-208-0001017
SHEET(S) 25 OF 54 1 DWG SCALE
DWG DATE 04/03/9019 SUPERSEDED
ill =20'
DRAWING NUMBER REVISION
PNG-C-208-0001027 C
DISCIPLINE / RESOURCE CENTER / LINE NUMBER

AREA TABLE
UTILITY STATION SITE EASEMENT (USSE) 10. 109 AC
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (TCE) 10.132AC EXHIBIT A
SCALE: V = 60'
60 30 0 60
UTILITY TEMPORARY
STATION SITE CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT EASEMENT
uc
PIN:6939205922000
BENNETT WATSON C. ROBERTS
DB 143 PG 203
DB 143 PG 203 3/4" IRON
ROD FOUND
LINE TABLE
LINE
BEARING
LENGTH
L1
SO4°31'38"E
56.90'
L2
SO4°02'55"E
31.90'
L3
N04°03'00"W
31.90'
L4
N04°03'00"W
56.91'
L5
N85°01'30"E
10.00,
NOTES
US N��H�A
-� �c�—bJV7
-j � O�
EX. STATION I
SITE O
O
PIN:6939121101000 p
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
COMPANY, INC.
DB 199, PG 680 O
Si -
VICINITY MAP (NOT TO S
PIN:6939205922000
BENNETT WATSON C. ROBERTS
DB 143 PG 203
DB 143 PG 202
ALUMINUM PIPE FOUND
@ PAINTED TREE
42"E 195.00' (TOTAL)
119
L5 N85°01_30"E 98.69' , 50.00` 25.53'.' X �X
r y-* !, X
/ NL'
USSE.'.'.'.'.'.
I;
S85°01'10"W 1.. ............. ..
�I.... T. TCE
S85 01 10 WW 184.70' �-
208-GATE-036_OS2
PIN:6928992140000
JAMES EARL TAYLOR
DB 65, PG 174 /
1. AREA BY COORDINATE COMPUTATION.
2. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND, IN US SURVEY FEET.
3. SUBJECT TO ANY AND ALL EASEMENTS, RIGHTS -OF -WAY,
STREETS AND ASSESSMENTS, AS THE SAME MAY APPEAR OF
RECORD IN THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE, CLERK OF COURT,
TOWN OR COUNTY TAX OFFICES, OR WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN
ACQUIRED BY PRESCRIPTIVE USE.
INTENDED FOR THE PURPOSES OF EASEMENT
I
4 THIS SURVEY IS
CARO
ACQUISIT ON ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A BOUNDARY
OF THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON.
��XN\\ �N
�/
SURVEY
��
5. NC GRID COORDINATES AS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON
\��O Q.�FESS/6N--
GPS OBSERVATIONS UTILIZING NCGS' NETWORK RTK SYSTEM
SEAL =
AND ARE REFERENCED TO THE NAD 83(NSRS 2011) DATUM.
_
COMBINED FACTOR 1 VERTICAL POSITIONS
_ I — 446 4
V
ARE REFERENCED TO NAVD 88(GEOID 1 A).
6. THIS MAP HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT
- \
'
Ci <,
/-,
AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND
'-1 El�•
SURJ
�F�'p•
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
�i �� ���
7. PURSUANT F A
NCGS 7FORf)A(PUBLIC
/// Y
PROPOSED EASEMENT TUTIILITY AS DEFINED EIFINO D IN G.S.
IS\;\\\��NN\
62-3.11
I, JEFFERY S. SMITH, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION (DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN
BOOK 65, PAGE 174); THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED
ARE CLEARLY INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION
FOUND IN BOOK 65 BOOK 174; THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION IS
1:11,756; AND THAT THIS MAP MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF
THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN NORTH
CAROLINA (12 NCAC 56.1600).
z�ll� PLS L-4 4
LEGEND
EASEMENT FOR
QO IRON PIPE SET(IPS) A REBAR FOUND (RBF)
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.Fzt-s
• COMPUTED POINT UTILITY POLE
ACROSS THE LANDS OFF
-
IRON ROD FOUND GUY WIRE
s- SE`vs: r�mr
— — — — FLARE SITE EASEMENT AREA
JAM ES EARL TAYLOR
REGIONAL LAND SURVEYORS, INC.
— — — — — — — EXISTING EASEMENT
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
SUBJECT BOUNDARY LINE (SURVEYED)
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
SUBJECT BOUNDARY LINE (NOT SURVEYED)
INC FIRM LICENSE NO. C-1362
UC— UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATIONS
80 US HWY 13
DRAWN BY: PGG
REVISIONS
ADJOINER BOUNDARY LINE (SURVEYED)
DEED BOOK 324 PAGE 705
DATE: 02/11/2019
03/27/2019
—OHU— OVERHEAD UTILITIES DB DEED BOOK
HALL TOWNSHIP, GATES COUNTY, NC
—O CHAIN LINK PB PLAT BOOK
JOB NO. 1822.04
X WIRE FENCE PG PAGE
CREW CHIEF: TB
— — — — RIGHT OF WAY E/P EDGE OF
nwYm v,• TREE LINE PAVEMENT
PROJECT # 3130255 TRACT # 208-GATE-036_OS2
PAGE 1 OF 1

9/17/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trustresources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section
that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for
additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Gates County, North Carolina
rand
:Is.- :n1
�A'=e w
YY �1r111�1rn
k%X
11n 1 11 rI I II_il
1
I'+tr!1111m r11r4
5
nw.I1-
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
18 [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/KHYZUGHLIFEDHCLM6SPX2CCKUI/resources 1/13

Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
IPaC: Explore Location
�o�
Foy
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/KHYZUGHLIFEDHCLM6SPX2CCKUI/resources 2/13

9/17/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near
the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and
project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can
only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in
IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries ).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information.
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAME STATUS
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/KHYZUGHLIFEDHCLM6SPX2CCKUI/resources 3/13

IPaC: Explore Location
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https.//ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Birds
NAME
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
httpL//ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Critical habitats
Threatened
STATUS
Endangered
STATUS
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS kS LOCATION.
In
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act .
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/KHYZUGHLIFEDHCLM6SPX2CCKUI/resources 4/13

9/17/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general
public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip:
enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
.F 90
NAME REEDING SEASON (IFA
........................................................................
IIN.G SEASON IS INDICATED
................................................................
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,04 CON'
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but
warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development
or activities.
httpL.//ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
..................................................................................
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
........................................................................................................
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS
...................................................................................
ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE.
"BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES
...........................................................................................................
THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
........................................................................................................
Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/KHYZUGHLIFEDHCLM6SPX2CCKUI/resources 5/13

9/17/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in 44
the continental USA and Alaska. 4e X0
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in J Pr }
the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
Xs�e
"w-NJ
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ
"Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (NW)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.)
A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be
used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the
week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that
week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was
found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence
is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence
across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted
Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any
week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/KHYZUGHLIFEDHCLM6SPX2CCKUI/resources 6/13

1:7`r1POIN
IPaC: Explore Location
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of
presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its
entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort ( )
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe .00 V%llk \0
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all
years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
%00-% %me
■ probability of p
%, breeding season
I survey effort no data
SPECIES ]AN
FEB
MAR
APR M (
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC
American Kestrel
BCC -BCR (This is ..—11—
..............................................
i
Bird of Conservation
..................................................
Concern (BCC) only in
...................................................
.part
...icular Bird
...............................
Conservation Regions
.....................................................
(BCR.... in the
...............................
continental USA)
Bald Eagle
g
I■■11.1+
11�� 11111111
hi I -�-- -111111111111111
(This is not Bird o
................................................
Conservation
Concern (B C) in this
.aa..............................................
rea, utwarrants
.............................................
attention because of
..................................................
the ..Eagle Act or for
.............................................
.potent
.............ial
........
susceptibilities in
..........................................
offshore areas from
.................................................
certain types of
......................................
development or
.......................................
activities.)
........................
Eastern Whip
poor -will
BCC R a n g e w i d e
......................................
(CON) (This is a Bird
................................................
of Conservation
.......................................
Concern (BCC)
...................................
throughout its range
..................................................
in the continental
...........................................
USA and Alaska.)
.........................................
-- _--1 -++--
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/KHYZUGHLIFEDHCLM6SPX2CCKUI/resources 7/13

IPaC: Explore Location
Prairie Warbler
BCC R a n g e w i d e
......................................
(CON) (This is a Bird
................................................
of Conservation
.......................................
Concern (BCC)
...................................
throughout its range
.......................................
in the continental
...........................................
USA and Alaska.)
.........................................
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC R a n g e w i d e
......................................
(CON) (This is a Bird
................................................
of Conservation
.......................................
Concern (BCC)
...................................
throughout its range
.......................................
in the continental
...........................................
USA and Alaska.)
.........................................
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
......................................
(CON) (This is a Bird
................................................
of Conservation
.......................................
Concern (BCC)
...................................
throughout its range
..................................................
in the continental
...........................................
USA a.nd Alaska.)
........................................
Rusty Blackbird
BCC Rangewide
..............................is........
(CON) (This a Bird
...............................................
of Conservation
.......................................
Concern (BCC)
...................................
.t...hroughout its range
..............................................
.i.n.the
.....continental
...................................
USA and Alaska.)
.........................................
+-+- ++-+ ++++ 1111 1111 1111 1111 1--- -A— ---+ -+--
+-+- ++-+ ++++ 111111" 1111 111 1 111 - 1 A— ---+ -+--
+-+- 1+-+ ++1+-��+ -+-- --
11-+ 1111 11++ +-++ ++-- ---- -+ -1 A- ----
Wood Thrush +_+— ++—+ +d I I
BCC Rangewide
......................................
(CON) (This is a Bird
................................................
ofConvatio
.n
Concern (BCC)..
...................................
throughout its range
..................................................
in the continental
..........................................
USA and Alaska.) ase
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at
any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to
occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to
occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or
bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species
that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is
queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/KHYZUGHLIFEDHCLM6SPX2CCKUI/resources 8/13

IPaC: Explore Location
intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore
activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the
Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen
science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, g6the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or
year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or
(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds
guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur
in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
j 14
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Con-servation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird
impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/KHYZUGHLIFEDHCLM6SPX2CCKUI/resources 9/13

IPaC: Explore Location
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam
Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the
Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be
in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring
in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10
km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or
minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about
conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize
impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities ! �J ^1(Z
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
This location overlaps the following National Wildlife Refuge lands:
LAN D
Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge
t. [phone]
18 [phone]
3100 Desert Road
Suffolk, VA 23434-8973
https://www.fws.gov/refuges/profiles/index.cfm?id=51580
ACRES
19,920.16 acres
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/KHYZUGHLIFEDHCLM6SPX2CCKUI/resources 10/13

IPaC: Explore Location
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update
our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual
extent of wetlands on site. 0\
This location overlaps the following wetlands: oe &
The area of this project is too large for IPaC to load all NWI wetlands in the area. The list below
may be incomplete. Please contact the local U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service office or visit the NWI
map for a full list.
FRESHWATER EMERGENT WETLAND
PEM1Ad
PEM1/SS1Ed
PEM1 F ICU
PEM1 B
PEM1 E
PEM1/FO1F
PEM1 Cd
PEM1A
PEM1 Bd
PEM1 Fx
PEM1C
PEM1Cx
PEM1 Fh
PEM1Ch
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
PFO1Ed
P FO1 Cd
PFO1E
PFO1 A
PFO1F
P FO1 /4C
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/KHYZUGHLIFEDHCLM6SPX2CCKUI/resources 11/13

IPaC: Explore Location
PF01 /4B
P FO 1 /4A
PF01 /2F
PF01 C
PF01 /2E
PSS1 F
PF04Cd
PF01/4Ad
PSS1 /EM1 E
PF04/1 C
PSS1 E
PF01/4Cd
PSS1 C
PSS1 /EM1 B
PSS1 B
PSS1 A
PSS1 /EM1 C
PF01 ME
PF04E
PF04C
PF06/UBF
PSS1 ME
PSS1 BE
PF06F
PSS3C
PF04A
PF01 B
FRESHWATER POND
PUBH 04
PUBHx
PUBHh
RIVERINE
R2UBH
R4SBC
R5UBFx
R5UBH
R2UBHx
Foy
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high
altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error
is inherent in the use of imagery, thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in
revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/KHYZUGHLIFEDHCLM6SPX2CCKUI/resources 12/13

IPaC: Explore Location
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietaryjurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish
the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal,
state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may
affect such activities.
Foy
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/KHYZUGHLIFEDHCLM6SPX2CCKUI/resources 13/13