19980240 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19980331

F
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Parker, DCM
FROM: John Dorney, DWQ
RE: Water Quality comments
Morehead City Railroad Trestle
Carteret County
DWQ Project # 980240
11kTTWAJ
NC ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
May 29, 1998
DWQ has no objections to this project which plans to replace the existing 2400
feet of timber railroad bridge across the Newport River Between the State Port and Radio
Island. As you are aware since there is no fill of waters or wetlands, no 461 Certification
is required.
Please call me at 733-1786 if you have any questions.
cc: Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
John Dorney
Central Files
Monica Toole, HNTB
980240.dcm
Environmental Sciences Branch 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone [phone]j.,, FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Wployer 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
&14
[D F== F1
Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch .
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
FAX:[phone]
Date
FAX TO: N FAX NUMBER: 2 - 3
FiROM:
PHONE:
NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET: 2-
4
W?k
Environmental Sciences Branch 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative' Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
#"

. .b

„ ! .. ,.?
i_V -4 MAY-26-1998 1252 HNTB-RALEIGH 919 782 3448 P.01/04
f1N7"B . RALEIGH OFFICE (088)
TELEFAX TRANSM17TAL
?/ , ` lrilf r l
DATE:
TOTAL NO. OF PAGES: ,
INCLUDING COVER
FROM: TO: J?,r??11?Glt?adY°VD?f'7Yyi
(Sender's Name) (Name of Party Sent To) _- J
PAX NO. (91 ) 782.344$ ?] FAX No. 7*t? q
HNTB Corporation FIRM: AJC-1229X,1) It
16 E. Rowan Street
' i Suite 410 LOCATION:
I Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone] PHONE:_7-3 07
! PROJECT NAME, 1Ut?+?/0'"/Vel PROJECT NO. '5•??P//., LoQ,t
FAX SUBJECT,&& 2r=rD!]VJ /t ?Ipp 4Q1 YV 011411?ta..
C,
? COMMENTS: ('
a . ! S?
dho&x a- 4D k4l, A-?- At, ab
TRANSMITTED BY
TIME SENT: UL? , M I ?It N/?I1
HNTB CORPORATION
PLEASE CALL SENQER AT 919-782-7770 IF TRANSMISSION DIFFICULTIES OCCUR.
r-
4 )s ft
MAY-26-1998 12:52 HNTH-RALEIGH 919 782 3448 P.02/04
w
rho jFNrj c wpaare. Memorandum
To John Dorney, Environmental/Biological Supervisor, Div. Of Date May 21, 1998
Water Quality, NC DENR
From Monica Toole, P.P.., Project Engineer B NTB Job Number 27834
Subject Beaufort & Morehead Railroad Bridge (Trestle)
Replacement overNewport River, port of Morehead City,
Carteret County, North Carolina
NCDOT State Project 6.503 340, TIP P-3100
Letter of Concurrence Regarding Section 401 Water
Quality Certification
To formally document the determination and understanding between both parties, it is the
understanding that no Section 401 Water Quality Certification is required for the above project
because:
1) of the minimal impacts described in the project Environmental Assessment/Finding of No
Signficant impact, dated 10/97
2) of the determination received from the US Army Corps of Engineers, Planning Services
Section for their Regulatory Branch to NCDOT, dated December 22, 1997 (copy attached)
that no COE Section 10 or Section 404 permits are required for the project
3) of returned correspondence from the Division of Water Quality (dated 3/30/98) to the
Division of Coastal Managemont (originally dated 3118/98) that DWQ has no objection to
tho proposed.project
4) verbal confirmation received from HNTB, team members from DWQ personnel (John Dorney
in personal conversation with Bruce Bolick, CZR, 5/5/98 and Eric Cxalamb in personal
conversation with Monica Toole, FINTB, 5/14/98) that no Section 401 Water Quality
Certification is needed for the above project.
Thereby, the NC Department ofEnvironment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of
Water Quality, who has jurisdiction over Section 401 Water Quality Certification in North
Carolina agrees with the above finding and no certification is needed for this project.
John Dorney
Environmental/Biological Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
NCI)ENR
Date
n6/ IM
MAY-26-1998 12:53
Si:PtT riY%w:lm?n?con uissriati

I
HNTH-RALEIGH 919 782 3448 P.03/04
1 4?I.4??/0 1 D• JY { uunvr. nry• r, .•uvn - ., ..
December 22, 1907
Planning Servicaa Section
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P,E., Manager
Planning and Environmental granch
North Carolina Division of HlgM ays
Post Office pox 25201
R*aigh, North Carolina 27911-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
This is In response to your letter of August e, 1097, rawasting our comarents
"f2ept8a:0r *nt Of 240Q ft. (approx) timber rallroad bridge (trestle) over thv Newport R
bQW80n the State Port at Morehead City and Radio island in Carteret County, North
T.I.P. No. P-3104, State Pr9lee t No, e.50304(r (Requistory Branch Action i,D, NO,
1997©5780),
our connMents involve ftagW to flood plains and Jurisdictional r®aayrvast v
Worths, wetlands, ang U.S. Army Corps of Engineers projects. Our cornmenta an
are enclosed.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this project If we can be of fa
assistance, please contact us.
Enclosure
COPY Famished (with copy of
incoming correspondence):
Commander
Fifth COMM Guard District
Federal Building
431 Crawford Street
Portsmouth, Virginia 23705
i:ICi`: (wlcy of Inc. Correa:).
Ct=S•AW RO-UMcLendon
CESAW TS-ON/Vatmam
r
Sinaorely,
James H, Bradley, P.&
Chief, Technical Services Division
the
Include
) Issues
MAY-26-1998 12:53 HNTB-RALEIGH 919 782 3448 P.04/04
•-r,1 a'..'YI !/1 •R?7111A11 •J YV11 Y?VY/ •YY l r+ VY I -•I- . +- .+? •.. p. ?. -.+.. .. - -.. -
' - N
Deaemb 33, 1907
•_ gs 4 Of 4
' U. . ARMY O S tcN t S C 1V
11ROPlaeernent of 2400 ft. (approx) timber railroad brldg• (tvativ) over the Newport R
between the State Port at Morehead Clty and ftedio Island In Carteret County, North
T-1.P. No, P-3400, State Project No, 9.503340" (Regulatory Branch Action 1.0. No. 11
11 &DOO PLAINS: 130C.
The proposed project is located in Carteret County and peitiially within the judeJd
Clone
IimitS of Morehead City, both of which particlpate in the National Flood Insurance prem,
Fron
t a review of Panele 702 and 709 of the August 10866 Carhrat County Flood Inssnce
ftto MAP (FIRM) end Panel 5 of the October 1083 Moroheud City FIRM, the 100-yelood
elevation at the site is 8 feet N.C.V.C. Once the flooding source is coastal storm su the
repl9oemerit of the trestle would not have any mo4ourable affect on the 100-year ffoelevation.
2• WAY RID AND WETLANDS: Qac -
Afthoygh your letter of August 9118e7, did not state the type of structure that w uId be
Wilt to replace the existing trestle, It Is our understanding that the structure wlll be rep oscE at
me Wating location. No wetlands will be filled or excovstod in connection with the pr need
project.
- In ravievring your proposal, we have det+erminiad th no itrtment or the At
pursuent to ,Section t0..oEtho Rivera and Hatboro Act of i ffd or ectTdn 404 of the
Witter Act (33 UGC'
V11) will be required to construct the proJsct., V Q ptit you
with the United States Coast Guar feoarding their requiraments'(If shy) pursuennt-ti
or the Rivera and Harbor Act of 1896,
If you have any quesoone, please contact Mr.
2, .V.-AM Y CO p O ROJECTS: P G- Mr. 11091`111
Nav Ration Section At 19101231-4411
We have no comments, provrdlno that the Federal navigation projeat In the Allan!
Intracoastal Waterway is not affected. From the Projeot description, this appears to be
c8se.
HIS
TOTAL P.04

- -•• :.. ?' r3r-"3N.s xtL PAPER
, 1 1 '
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Department of Transportation - Beaufort/Morehead City
Railroad Trestle
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Carteret County, near Morehead City, between the State Port and
Radio Island, over the Newport River
Photo Index - 1995: 41-509 (indexed by H,5-9; I,10-13) 1990: Taylor xed by
F,1-3; G,4-7)
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2,683,000 Y: 360,800 Beaufort Quad'
MAR 3 i
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F 1998 s
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - February 13, 1998
Was Applicant Present No
5
6.
1
.-A
7.
PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - February 12, 1998
Office - Morehead City
SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Carteret County
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PT, EW, ES
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Timber railroad bridge
Planned - Concrete railroad bridge
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
[AREA]
DREDGED FILLED
OTHER
-(A) Vegetated Wetlands
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands Usurpation of
Newport River 28,800 ft2
(C) Other Site Preparation
High ground 576 ff
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 29,376 ff
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA & SC Open: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to replace the existing 2400' timber railroad bridge
across the Newport River.

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
NCDOT - RAILROAD TRESTLE/CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #2
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION:
Project Setting
The project site is located immediately south of the US 70 high-rise bridge which
spans the mouth of the Newport River, in Carteret County, between Radio Island on the
east and Morehead City on the west. The existing 2400' timber railroad bridge between
Radio Island and the State Port at Morehead City primarily serves the port facilities
located on Radio Island. It was originally constructed in 1908 and according to the
applicant is beyond the end of its useful service life. An existing 80' steel bascule spans
over the navigational channel of the Newport River along the Intracoastal Waterway.
The existing structure is a single track, open deck railroad bridge. The
superstructure consists of jointed rail and timber crossties resting on timber beams.
Approximately 386 timber caps and piles (piers) support the superstructure. The bascule
span is located approximately 600' from the west end of the bridge and provides an
opening in the navigational channel for boat traffic. Clearance under the railroad bridge
averages less than 4' above MSL. Tides average -1.2 ft. to 1.3 ft. MSL. Water depths
along the railroad bridge range from less than 10' near shore to 30'-40' along the
channel. The existing right of way is 100'. The mouth of the Newport River is SA
waters. while the Morehead City Harbor Area is SC. The area is closed to shell fishing.
.The NCDOT submitted an Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant-,:.
Impact - for clearinghouse distribution in November of 1997.
Project Description
The NCDOT proposes to, replace the 2400:' timber railroad bridge across the
Newport River between the State Port at Morehead City and Radio Island in Carteret
County, North Carolina. The proposed structure would be constructed on the existing
alignment. The existing timber structure would be completely removed during the
construction process. The applicant proposes to cut the existing timber pilings off just
below the mud line. In addition, 90 concrete piles to. the south of the existing bridge
would also be removed during the construction. These pilings would be pulled or
broken off approximately one foot below the mud line.
The proposed structure would be a single track ballast deck railroad bridge. The
superstructure would consist of jointed rail, timber crossties and crushed stone ballast
resting directing on matched pairs of precast, prestressed concrete girders. The
supporting structures would be precast, reinforced concrete caps placed on top of
concrete and steel foundation piers. There would be approximately 80 piers spaced at
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
NCDOT - RAILROAD TRESTLE/CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #3
30' centers. The existing bascule span would not be replaced as part of this proposal and
would remain in place and fully operational. All work would be performed from barges.
And according to the applicant, no work channels are proposed and no jetting would take
place during construction. The new abutments would be constructed behind existing
abutments.
Anticipated Impacts
Although the proposed 12' X 2400' railroad trestle would continue to usurp
approximately 28,800 fie of Public Trust Areas of the Newport River, this bridge
replacement project would not increase the Public Trust Area affected. Some
disturbance of the substrates would occur during pier/piling installation. However,
according to the applicant, the pilings would not be jetted down so there should be
minimal impact on the water quality and fisheries resources of the Newport River.
There would be a substantial reduction in the number of piles in the Public Trust Area as
a result of the removal of the old timber structure. Approximately 576 fiz of high
ground would be disturbed/excavated to facilitate abutment installation. However, all
land-disturbing activity would take place behind the existing abutments, therefore
minimizing any potential adverse impacts to the estuarine system.
x
The project should not affect boating traffic within the navigational channel
(AIWW). And in order to accommodate rail traffic during construction, the contractor
would be allowed a 4 day railroad shutdown for construction with the railroad. placed in
service at the end of each 4 day work period.
Beaufort and Morehead Railroad Bridge Replacement
Project Description
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to replace the 2400 ft. timber
railroad bridge across the Newport River between the State Port at Morehead City and Radio
Island in Carteret County, North Carolina. The existing bridge was originally constructed in
1908 and is beyond the end of its useful service life. Under state inspection criteria, this bridge
recently scored a sufficiency rating of 9 out of a possible 100. If this were a highway bridge it
would have been immediately closed. However, since it provides the only rail access to Radio
Island, it has remained in service. Because of its poor condition, this bridge has required
constant maintenance and has raised safety and environmental concerns.
The proposed structure will be constructed on the existing bridge alignment, and the existing
timber structure will be completely removed during the construction process (existing timber
piles will be cut off just below the mud line). In addition to removal of the existing timber piles,
90 concrete piles to the south of the existing bridge will also be removed during the construction
process. The additional concrete piles will be pulled or broken off approximately one foot from
the mud line. The existing steel bascule span across the navigational channel of the Newport
River will remain for incorporation into the new structure. Removal of the existing piles, and an
increase in span lengths from 6 ft. to 30 ft. with the new bridge, should result in a net increase in
water flow beneath the bridge. The new bridge will have 148 piles.
Approximately 64 cubic yards of material will be excavated from high ground for construction
of the abutments. The excavated material will be used to build up the railroad bed at the eastern
end of the bridge and as backfill behind the new abutments. The dimensions of excavation at the
eastern end will be (1' deep)(8' long)(24' wide) + (4' deep)(4' long)(24' wide). The dimensions of
excavation at the western end will be (3' deep)(8' long)(24' wide) + (6' deep)(4' long)(24' wide).
The total volume of high ground fill behind the east abutment will be 214 cubic yards.
'All work over water will be performed from barges. No work channels will be constructed, and
no dredging or jetting will take place during the construction process. In order to avoid
disturbance to the adjacent shorelines, the new abutments will be constructed behind existing
abutments which will remain in place.
Statement of Compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Protection Act
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is currently in the process of complying with
the North Carolina Environmental Protection Act. The `Beaufort na Morehead Railroad Bridge
(Trestle) Replacement Over the Newport River,, Pert of Morehead- , Carteret County, North
Carolina, State Environmental Assessment L Finding of No Sigt n?c ant Imact' 'was submitted
for clearinghouse distribution in November 1997.

APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
c. Street address or secondary road number
Immediately south of the US 70 bridge across
the Newport River
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? x Yes No
Name North Carolina Department of Transportation
Contact person: H. Franklin Vick, P.E.
Address P.O. Box 25201
City Raleigh State NC
Zip 27611-5201 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name CZR Incorporated
Address 4709 College Acres Dr. Suite 2
City Wilmington State NC
Zip 28403 Day Phone [phone]
Fax _ [phone]
c. ;Project name (if any) Beaufort and Morehead
Railroad Bridge (Trestle) Replacement
NOTE: Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s), and/or
project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a., County Carteret
b. City, town, community or landmark
Morehead City ! Radio Island
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g.
river, creek, sound, bay) Newport River
3. DESCRIPTION AND
PLANNED USE OF
PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose
(e.g. building a home, motel, marina,
bulkhead, pier, and excavation and/or filling
activities.
Railroad bridge (trestle)
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an
existing project, new work, or both?
Replacement of existing bridge
c. Will the project be. for .public,,. private or
commercial use? Public
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use,
methods of construction and daily operations
of proposed project. If more'space is needed,
please attach additional pages.
see attached sheet
n. Describe location and type of discharges to
4. LAND AND WATER waters of the state. (For example, surface
CHARACTERISTICS runoff, sanitary wastewater, industrial/
commercial effluent, "wash down" and
residential discharges.) Surface runoff
from railroad bridge
a. Size of entire tract Right of way= 2400x 100 ft.
b. Size of individual lot(s) NA
o. Describe existing drinking water supply
source.
NA
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NWL Existing bridge ranges from 6.2 to 10.1
ft. above MSL
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
A thin laver of recently deposited silt and
sand overlying interlayered clays and shelly
sands of the Yorktown or Duplin formations.
e. Vegetation on tract NA (or)en water)
f. Man-made features now on tract Railroad
bridae with bascule
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (consuit the iocaiiand use
plan.)
x Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Lands at eastern and western ends of project
area zoned lndustrial .
?s
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the
applicable zoning. x Yes No
(AYtach zoning compliance certificate, if app)icabie)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment
been done for the tract?
Yes x No If yes, by whom?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes x No
1. Are there wetlands on the site?
Yes x No
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment
facilities.
NA
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
•
•
•
A copy of the deed (with state application
only) or other instrument under which the "
applicant claims title to the affected
properties. If the applicant is not claiming to
be the owner of said property, then forward a
copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written
permission from the owner to carry out the
project.
An accurate, dated work plat (including plan
view and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to
scale in black ink on an 8 %i "by 11 " white
paper. (Refer to Coastal Resources
Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a detailed
,.
description.)
Please note that original drawings are
preferred and only high quality copies will be
accepted. Blue-line prints or other larger plats
are acceptable only if an adequate number of
quality copies are provided by applicant.
(Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of
plat requirements and it must be sufficiently
detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar
with the area to,. the site: Include highway or
secondary road (Fi) $13)., UM.- landmarks, and
the like.
A Stormwater Certification, if one is
necessary.
30 days in which to submit comments on the this application will allow only the development
proposed project to the Division of Coastal described in the application. The project will be
Management. Upon signing this form, the subject to conditions and restrictions contained in
applicant further certifies that such notice has the permit.
been provided.
certify that to the best of my knowledge, the
Name Carolyn Carter proposed activity complies with the State of
Address 108 Old Causeway Rd. North Carolina's approved Coastal Management
Beaufort NC 28516 Program and will be conducted in a manner
consistent with such program.
Phone
certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in
fact, grant permission to representatives of state
Name Erik Strombero. NC State Ports Authority and federal review agencies to enter on the
Address 2202 Burnett Blvd. aforementioned lands in connection with
Wilmington. NC 28401 evaluating information related to this permit
application and follow-up monitoring of the
Phone project.
I further certify that the information provided in
Name this application is truthful to the best of my
Address knowledge.
Phone
This is the 1 1 th day of February, 1998.
A list of previous state or federal permits
issued for work on the project tract. Include Print Name Bruce Bolick. Vice President, CZR Inc.
permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates. ?
NA -- bridge originally constructed in 1908 aL G
Signature
Landowner or Authorized Agent

• A check for $250 made payable to the Please indicate attachments pertaining to your
Department of Environment, Health, and proposed project.
Natural Resources (DEHNR) to cover the costs
of processing the application. - DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
>?? :A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in - DCM MP-3 Upland Development
',oceanfront and inlet areas.
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - to X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
10) If the project involves the expenditure of
public funds or use of public lands, attach a - DCM MP-6 Marina Development
statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
See attached sheet NOTE.• Please sign and date each attachment in
the space provided at the bottom of each
form.
6. CERTIFICATION AND
PERMISSION TO ENTER ON
LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA
Major Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to
complete all other sections of the Joint Application
that relate to this proposed project.
1. BRIDGES
a. Public X Private
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
Superstructure comprised of jointed rail.
timber crossties. crushed stone ballast and
prestressed concrete t-beams. Substructure
comprised of concrete and steel biers.
c. Water body to be crossed by bridge
Newport River
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at
MLW or NWL 10 ft. near shore/30-40 ft, in
navigation channel of AIWW
e. a Will proposed bridge replace an existing
bridge? X Yes No
1f 'yes,
(1) ` Length- ofi existing bridge 2400 ft.
(2) Width of existing bridge' 12 ft.
(3) Navigation-ciearance underneath
existing bridge,. average < 4 ft.
;(4) Will all; or a part of, the existing
bridge be removed? (Explain) Trestle and
associated piles removed to just below mud
line. Steel bascule segment will remain,
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing
culvert(s)? Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert
above the MHW or NWL
9•
h.
k
(4) Will all, or part of, the existing culvert
be removed? (Explain)
Length of proposed bridge 2400 ft.
Width of proposed bridge 12 ft.
Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
NA (no wetlands present)
Will the proposed bridge affect existing
water flow? X Yes No
If yes, explain Removal of the existing
piles. and an increase in s ao n lengths from
6 to 30 ft. with the new bridge. should
increase water flow
Navigation clearance underneath proposed
bridge Clearance beneath western end will
remain approximately the same as the
exiting bridge. Clearance beneath eastern
end will increase as much as 3.5 ft. The
steel bascule segment will remain, hence
clearance in navigation channel will : b .
unaffected.
Will the proposed bridge affect navigation
by reducing or increasing the existing
navigable opening? Yes X No
If Yes, explain
M. Will the proposed, Oridge cross wetlands
containing no navigable waters?
Yes X. -.No
If yes, explain
n. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard
concerning their appro4?
-X_ Yes No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
Coast Guard review in {ogress.
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing
2. CULVERTS navigation potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed 3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
b. Number of culverts proposed
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge
c. Type of culvert (construction material, or culvert require any excavation below the
style) MHW or NWL? _ Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing
bridge? Yes No (2) Width of area to be excavated
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge (3) Depth of area to be excavated
(2) Width of existing bridge (3)
Navigation clearance underneath existing (4) Amount of material to be excavated in
bridge (4) Will cubic yards
all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge
or culvert require any excavation within:
Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other
Wetlands X_ No
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing If yes,
culvert? Yes No (1) Length of area to be excavated
"If. yes, (2) Width of area to be excavated
(1) Length of existing culvert (3) Amount of material to be excavated in
-(2) Width of existing culvert (3) cubic yards
Height of the top of the existing culvert c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge
k .. above the MHW or NWL or culvert : require: any . highground
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert excavation?
be removed? (Explain) X _ Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area'to be excavated see
attached drawings and prG.0ect description
(2) Width of area to. be excavated see
f. Length of proposed culvert attached drawings and .Oroject de'scription
(3) Amount..of material to be excavated in
g. Width of proposed culvert cubic yards 64 cubic yards
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert involves any excavation, please complete
above the MHW or NWL the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing used as high ground fill at east end of
water flow? Yes No bridge and as backfill behind abutments
If yes, explain-
- (2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
see attached drawin

r g
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission
from the owner.
(4) Will the disposal area be available for
future maintenance? Yes N_ No
(5) Does the disposal area include a. Will the proposed project involve any
any coastal wetlands (marsh), mitigation? Yes _X No
SAVs, or other wetlands? If yes, explain in detail
Yes X No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2) b. Will the proposed project require the
above. relocation of any existing utility lines?
(6) Does the disposal area include any area Yes X No
below the MHW or NWL? If yes, explain in detail
Yes X No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. C. Will the proposed project require the
2 above. construction of any temporary detour
structures?
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge Yes X No
or culvert result in any fill (other than If yes, explain in detail
excavated material described in Item d.
above) to be placed below MHW or NWL?
Yes X_No d. Will the proposed project require any work
If yes, channels? Yes _ X No
(1) Length of area to be filled (2) If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
Width of area to be filled (3)
Purpose of fill e. How will excavated or fill material be kept
on site and erosion controlled? Fill l? :.
at east end of bridge will be covered with
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge ballast and track and become part of the
or culvert result in any fill (other than railroad bed
excavated material described in Item d.
above) to be placed within: f. What type of construction equipment..will
Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other be used (for example, dragline, backhoe or
Wetlands X_ No hydraulic dredge)? Supply barges, barge
If yes, mounted crane, barge mounted crawler
(1) Length of area to be filled (2) crane. tug-boat, air compressors. Welding
Width of area 'to be filled (3) machine, generators. vibratory hammer pile
Purpose of fill. driver, diesel hammer pile driver, hydraulic
crane backhoe clam shell bucket of
s assorted pick-up trucks'
g. Will the=placement of the. proposed bridge -
or culvert result` in any., fill (other than g. Will wetlands be crossed ',in transporting
excavated material described in Item d. equipment to project site?
above).to-be placed on highground? Yes X No
Yes X 'No If yes, explain steps that will be taken to
If yes, - lessen environmental impacts.
:(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge
or culvert require any shoreline
(3) Purpose of fill stabilization? Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
4. GENERAL
Beaufort and Mprehead Railroad Bridge
Applicant or Project Name
Y9A414a-CA>1 J2Z
Signature
}
11 Februarv 1998
Date
ll fE?i
r

SCALE
1 _ 0 •; 1?.. rx. 1 4)AM
0 0_5 1 MKE
r°e .°"' NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
BEAUFORT AND MOREHEAD RAILROAD
TRESTLE OVER NEWPORT RIVER BETWEEN
MOREHEAD CITY AND RADIO ISLAND
CARTERET COUNTY P-3100
VICINITY MAP :::: ?FlGl
/.fee
:- ¦
a. •?
Lys--? --C „;` _?? •? i ?' f
x" • , < ao
+.: W d x o ch
` ? . \ _ .lam opa7 ? r., a •?l? a
z4w
W Ec
.3 \v
A a M x o x a
r..4 .21
Beaufort Gxann + ` m `? • ,,.s`r~ .:
N, o
ButkheoA
W o p o'er -tA
av Pa, /? Z d /?? I; . n.
J u ; ? /1
,? J `? Od I G E
W ooK .
4,
z ?<
(l(?t>
r
If, 0
?i?i' _ -?
i-'
Grab ------______
d
16
o ? E? 4
}
d 3 x
x
a ° EJ y4
v ?? Q Q o F o
co
m ?r -
s
J
z
Z
? J
H>

? m
Y H

,t
O ??++

Z pp
4? O
.761 (

c-
w
w a a p
e m
o i
Q

- - zp w
x
?- - -
M
C 3
oew?
?ao ao?
0
o
7x
ua ??zyz?y
?u2
w?-
1rV U
?
- -?.--` --,- - aa
?.-7?
o x (
a
o
z as m x
p

m
5
z
W
c
W
y
O
a
a

v
z
A
q
a Nl

Z s
x

---- ng.l
w
?
Z a
? a
W Y ?W . s

.W Z uz-i^W?FF m m p??a .. x. f
?? a ?W ,W,• ????.. 3
W w y?'?z?'r'9?9 $aa=??

m
M. RWH
.81 ?r
W ?o C.O.?p OGO .-
0
W
N o a
Z
a
a
?
4?I?,= a
44ll ppa?x? WZ 5
d <? a
W

C ??iy?Z
WW u
?
-
UaWU
J Z p
yDy
-: 2 K s Pq
?. ?Ktiw a
?
W
?µK uy 3eVp ? ?iy
.tn !gip
] O?yyyC???YY ??{? 1 ¢?
M
n

Z o
$ €R7atmM?YNYQF
aa°
> N ?
? did ?k?3?a e
N

1=
c?
i
tm
it..
M at e Lin e

I N I

IN I

IN I I II

IN I I Is

i
?
? C
n

° - c
c
u
n
+
- - n

a ; $ a
_ c

? o
l 0
o 0

In I
O
O
Z +
0>

- o
O
b N;
m

O

+
n

n

Z ?
J y
N

O
?O
W

U
a
z
_

o

_ z ` 0
0 0
o O O O N M
_ O O
v V) O O
>O r O
, m O
P

? ? 41
v z c 1 ??1 ? Y

V W
j

> O
J O
T
M

a

z
Lr)
W> I>
N
Ovid I >
VZ
Z]
Z2?
C7
oo=
000
JI?++ I

i
i .,

r Y gS
Cg ??° 8
e 1?
Hill
0
v Ea
0
0
v
+
c
t
n
r
0
v
i

? O
o?
>
N_

J

2- x 6-
DRAIN OPENING
(TYP. EA SIDE)
iq
I
w
CONST. JT.
(TYP. EA SIDE)
6•-0. 6._0.
8• 2'-6- 2!-10- 2'-6• s•

! ?
STEM BRIDGE TOP OF RAIL
& VOID & TRACK . & VOID

d ?I I o
h
? 4
?

r??+++ a ++r?+ +r??rr ?+s+a?
44 +++
??rr?i +4,e ++r 4p+
1'-4- 1'-4-
1-10• 1-6- 2'-9- 1-10'
CAST CURB AFTER
RELEASE OF PRESTRESS
in
I
0
I
.I
IH
r
NOTE: (+) INDICATES STRAND LOCATION

PROPOSED
TYPICAL SECTION NOTE: (+) INDICATES STRAND LOCATION
TRANSITION SPANS O
ABUTMENTS & BASCULE)
- 10 3?
°' '°`r" °• NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
s DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
c PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
BEAUFORT AND MOREHEAD RAILROAD
TRESTLE OVER NEWPORT RIVER BETWEEN
MOREHEAD CITY AND RADIO ISLAND
CARTERET COUNTY . P-3100
PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION FIG. 5
12'-0' J
Korchea4 0<5
LIMITS OF EXCAVATION
P
4---
I PRO
OSED WEST ABUTMENT
RAILROAD DaSTING
f tc PROPOSED
r
2'-0' 2'-?•
4'-0' 8.,0.

V ewPort R; ver
P M CAt1APQN. WES1 AflU DA,?NT,..
?*- t PROPOSED WEST ABUTMENT
I 12'- N f- EXISTING EMBANKMENT
-? _ EXISTTMG & PROPOSED t'/IQ
Morehead(
TO 8'-0" Tb MIDPOINT, OF WE
TOTAL VOLUME OF EXCAVATION
9 WEST ABUTMENT
r 1152 W
-0" 2'-0' 42.7 c.y.
4'-0* NOTE: FI6L REQUIRED
VWOT ENO
SEC110N. THkQ GH .XC VAT(ON A &-5-T.-ABUTMENT
-Fort- a?a( V?o,^e`Ieaol ???j?4a?Bd'ia? ?

?lewPOrt
R.i Vef
LIMITS OF EXCAVATION
T. PROPOSED EAST ABUTMENT
i

RAILROAD EXISTING i -
PROPOSED i

4

e
1
fY
N
Rcd o
Is Iau

N
t PROPOSE)? EAST ABUTMENT•------«.
1 ABUTMFACE ENT (PROPOSED)
5X$@NG EMBANKMENT ,? - - PROPOSED T/R - -
'
EXISTING T/R - - - - t -8 1/4*
RQd;o
N ewport (ano(
R, ver
8'-.0- TO MIDPOINT OF SLOPE / a
TOTAL'-VOLUME OF EXCAVATION
0 EAST ABUTMENT
576 ft '
21.3 c.y.
NOTE: SEE NEXT SHEET FOR FILL ZONE. -0"
SEPTIQ I]JROUGH EXCAVA7IQN. 0 EAST NT
or?eGLQao? IQ?iI ??0?? Q?? e
a?1o ? 8

q

N

1
l

o
?- Cs L •i
1
b b Oe
4 ap
IR E bdN
.. _.. I......._ off '00+LS S
1 , ..Old L.; ?
58+9£
o QWSL+9T
i
0
0w•L?
+9£
95<0LO
A -
?7S 3 ?
i OW,
i ta00+K
:i
-CC C
f?j i y
9yyT
:i
_ i Ot0 L?
®ro,
.Z t
PA,
i ° O LO'L
ii
- ? i J oesB; c:l
i
fltio c 00++£
owe'.
i - i eto`e'sL+
W, 0
/ _7Y
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONME AND NATURAL RESOURCES
ION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
e MIA
WDENR APR - 2
V4 GRU SEC %
UAttTY N D? \"/
JAMES B. HUNTJP-,.. WATER
GOVERNOR arch 18, 1998
MAR 2 0 1998
MEMORANDUM: DIVISION OF
WAYNEMCDEVITT TO: Mr. A. Preston Howard P.E. DirectorOASTAL MANAGEMENT
SECRETARY 1 ,
Division of Water Quality
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
ROGER N. SCHECTER
DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: NC DOT Beaufort/Morehead City Railroad
Trestle
=N Project Location: between the State Port and Radio Island,
A over the Newport River, near Morehead
n City, Carteret County
x
Proposed Project: to replace the existing 2400' "timber
railroad bridge across the Newport River
Please indicate below your-agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form by April 8, 1998. If you have any.. questions regarding the proposed.
.. .
project, please contact Ted Tyndall at [phone]. When appropriate, in-depth
comments with supporting data is requested.
--° REPLY: X This agency has no objection to theproject as proposed.
-_-? - - _
i
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the
attached comments.
r SIGNED: R C J4 - / tea ,tee 1, DATE
b,
04 LJ__
MOREHEAD CITY OFFICE
'' . HESTRON PLAZA II 151-B HIGHWAY 24 MOREHEAD CITY NC 28557
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST-CONSUMER PAPER
.-
'.
?':
?. .
I

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Department of Transportation - Beaufort/Morehead City
Railroad Trestle
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Carteret County, near Morehead City, between the State Port and
Radio Island, over the Newport River
Photo Index - 1995: 41-509 (indexed by H,5-9; I,10-13) 1990: Taylor Creek (indexed by
F,1-3; G,4-7)
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2,683,000 Y: 360,800 Beaufort Quad "UL"
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F
4. 'INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - February 13, 1998
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - February 12, 1998
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Carteret County C
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PT, EW, ES MAR 2 0 1998
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public DIVISION O
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A COASTAL MAIJAGEMENT
Planned - N/A `
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Timber railroad bridge
Planned -Concrete railroad bridge
(C) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. ?TABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands r

(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands Usurpation of
Newport River 28,800 f
(C) Other Site Preparation
High round 576 fe
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 29,376 ft2
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA & SC Open: No
{
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to replace the existing 2400' timber railroad bridge
across the Newport River.

.t
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
NCDOT - RAILROAD TRESTLE/CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #2
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION:
Project Setting
The project site is located immediately south of the US 70 high-rise bridge which
spans the mouth of the Newport River, in Carteret County, between Radio Island on the
east and Morehead City on the west. The existing 2400' timber railroad bridge between
Radio Island and the State Port at Morehead City primarily serves the port facilities
located on Radio Island. It was originally constructed in 1908 and according to the
applicant is beyond the end of its useful service life. An existing 80' steel bascule spans
over the navigational channel of the Newport River along the Intracoastal Waterway.
The existing structure is a single track, open deck railroad bridge. The
superstructure consists of jointed rail and timber crossties resting on timber beams.
Approximately 386 timber caps and piles (piers) support the superstructure. The bascule
span is located approximately 600' from the west end of the bridge and provides an
opening in the navigational channel for boat traffic. Clearance under the railroad bridge
averages less than 4' above MSL. Tides average -1.2 ft. to 1.3 ft. MSL. Water depths
along the railroad bridge range from less than 10' near shore to 30'-40' along the
channel. The existing right of way is 100'. The mouth of the Newport Rir is SA
waters while the Morehead City Harbor Area is SC. The area is closed to shell fishing.
The NCDOT submitted an Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant
Impact for clearinghouse distribution in November of 1997.
Project Description
ti The NCDOT proposes to replace the 2400' timber railroad bridge across the
Newport River between the State Port at Morehead City and Radio Island in Carteret
County, North Carolina. The proposed structure would be constructed on the existing
alignment: The existing timber structure would be completely removed during the
construction process. The applicant proposes to cut the Zxisting timber pilings' off just`
below the mud line. In addition, 90 concrete piles to the so1qt1hbf the existing bridge
would also be removed during the construction. Thpse: pilings would be pulled or
broken off approximately one foot below the mud line.
The proposed structure would be a single track ballast dec? railroad bridge. The
superstructure would consist of jointed rail, timber crossties and crushed stone ballast
resting directing on matched pairs of precast, prestressed concrete girders. The
supporting structufes would be precast, reinforced concrete caps pjaced on top of
concrete and steel foundation piers. There would be approximately 80 piers spaced at
f

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
NCDOT - RAILROAD TRESTLE/CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #3
30' centers. The existing bascule span would not be replaced as part of this proposal and
would remain in place and fully operational. All work would be performed from barges.
And according to the applicant, no world channels are proposed and no jetting would take
place during construction. The new abutments would be constructed behind existing
abutments.
Anticipated Impacts
Although the proposed 12' X 2400' railroad trestle would continue to usurp
approximately 28,800 fe of Public Trust Areas of the Newport River, this bridge
replacement project would not increase the Public Trust Area affected. Some
disturbance of the substrates would occur during pier/piling installation. However,
according to the applicant, the pilings would not be jetted, down so there should be
minimal impact on the water quality and fisheries resources of the Newport River.
There would be a substantial reduction in the number of piles in the Public Trust Area as
a result of the removal of the old timber structure. Approximately 576 ft2 of high
ground would be disturbed/excavated to facilitate abutment installation. However, all
land-disturbing activity would take place behind the existing abutments, therefore
minimizing any potential adverse impacts to the estuarine system.
The project should not affect boating traffic within the navigational channel
(AIWW). And in order to accommodate rail traffic during., construction, the contractor.
`would be allowed a 4 day railroad shutdown. for construction, with the railroad placed in
.5 service. at the end of each 4 day work period.
.
M. Ted Tyndall Morehead C1ty Office - March 18, 1998
0
??O rho
CZR
INCORPORATED
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
Ted Tyndall
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Hestron Plaza II
151-B Highway 24
Morehead City, NC 28557
Dear Mr. Tyndall:
4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
SUITE 2
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
czrwilmOaol.com
11 February 1998

CZR appreciates the opportunity we had to meet with you on 14 January 1998 to discuss
the CAMA Major Development Permit application for the replacement of the Beaufort and
Morehead Railroad Bridge. This was a productive meeting which we hope will streamline the
application process. We have incorporated your suggestions from our meeting into a revised
permit application which we have enclosed along with a check for the $ 250.00 application fee:
Included in the revisions are new, simpler figures depicting the high ground excavation and. fill.
Please call Bruce Bolick or me if you have a need for any additional information. Thanks again
for your assistance with this project.
Sincerely,
t,

cc: Monica Toole, HNTB
Bruce Bolick, Project-Manager
1598.01 file
140 INTRACOASTAL POINTE DRIVE • SUITE 301 • JUPITER, FLORIDA 33477-5064
TEL [phone] • FAX [phone] • czrjup0aol.com

Beaufort and Morehead Railroad Bridge Replacement
Project Description
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to replace the 2400 ft. timber
railroad bridge across the Newport River between the. State Port at Morehead City and Radio
Island in Carteret County, North Carolina. The existing bridge was originally constructed in
1908 and is beyond the end of its useful service life. Under state inspection criteria, this bridge
recently scored a sufficiency rating of 9 out of 6. possible 100. If this were a highway bridge it
would have been immediately closed. However, since it provides the only rail access to Radio
Island, it has remained in service. Because of its poor condition, this bridge has required
constant maintenance and has raised safety and environmental concerns.
The proposed structure will be constructed on the existing bridge alignment, and the existing
timber structure will be completely removed during the construction process (existing timber
piles will be cut off just below the mud line). In addition to removal of the existing timber piles,
90 concrete piles to the south of the existing bridge will also be removed during the construction
process. The additional concrete piles will be pulled or broken off approximately one foot from
the mud line. The existing steel bascule span across the navigational channel of the Newport
River will remain for incorporation into the new structure. Removal of the existing piles, and an
increase in span lengths from 6 ft. to 30 ft. with the new bridge, should result in a net increase in
water flow beneath the bridge. The new bridge will have 148 piles.
Approximately 64 cubic yards of material will be excavated from high ground for construction
of the abutments. The excavated material will be used to build up the railroad bed at thee.eastern
end oflxhe bridge and as backfill behind the new abutments. The dimensions of excavation at the
eastern end will be (1' deep)(8' long)(24' wide) + (4' deep)(4' long)(24' wide). The dimensions of
excavation at the western end will be (3' deep)(8' long)(24' wide) ,+ (6' deep)(4' long)(24' wide).
The total volume of high ground fill behind the east abutment will be 214 cubic yards.
All work over water will be performed from barges. No work: channels will be constructed, and
no dredging or jetting will take place during the construction process. In order to avoid
disturbance to the adjacent shorelines, the new abutments will be constructed behind.existing
abutments which will remain in place.
Statement of Compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Protection Act
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is currently in the process of complying with
the North Carolina Environmental Protection Act. The "Beaufort and Morehead Railroad Bridge
(Trestle) Replacement Over the Newport River, Port Q Morehead City, Car red County, North
Carolina, State Environmental Assessment L Finding 4f No Significant Impact" was submitted
for clearinghouse distribution in November 1997.
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
Name North Carolina Department of Transoortation
Contact person: H. Franklin Vick, P.E.
Address P.O. Box 25201
City Raleigh State NC
Zip 2761 1-5201 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name CZR Incorporated
Address 4709 College Acres Dr. Suite 2
City Wilmington State NC
Zip 28403 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
e! Project name (if any) Beaufort and Morehead
Railroad Bridge (Trestle) Replacement
NOTE: Permit will be issyed-ln,namerbf landowner(s); and/or
project flame.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County Carteret 4.
b. City, town, community or landmark
Morehead City / Radio Island
c. Street address or secondary road number
Immediately south of the US 70 bridge across
the Newport River
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? x Yes No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g.
river, creek, sound, bay) Newport River
3. DESCRIPTION AND
PLANNED USE OF
PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propane
(e.g. building a home, motel, marina,
bulkhead, pier, and excavation and/or fitling
activities.
Railroad bridge (trestle)

b. Is the proposed activity maintenance'of an, , r
existing project, new work, or both?
Replacement of existing bridge
c. Will the project be for public, private or
commercial use? Public
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use,
methods of construction and daily operations
of proposed project:' If more space is needed,
please attach additional pages. -
see attached sheet
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract Right of way= 2400x100 ft.
b. Size of individual lot(s) NA
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NWL_ Existing bridge ranges from 6.2 to 10.1
ft. above MSL
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
A thin layer of recently deposited silt and
sand overlying interla eered clays and shelly
sands of the Yorktown or Duolin formations.
e. Vegetation on tract NA (open water)
n. Describe location and type of discharges to
waters of the state. (For example, surface
runoff, sanitary wastewater, industrial/
commercial effluent, "wash down" and
residential discharges.) Surface runoff
from railroad bridge
o. Describe existing drinking water supply
source.
NA
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
f. Man-made features now on tract Railroad •
bridge with bascule
g.. `hat is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
criissification of the site? (Consult the local land use
plan;, :
x Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
?. h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
:Lands at eastern and western ends of project
area zoned Industrial
i. Is fhe proposed project consistent with the
applicable zoning? x Yes No,
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
j. Has a, professional archaeological assessment
been done for the tract?
Yes x No If yes, bye w.opm?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve 'a National
Register listed or eligible property?_..
Yes x No
1. Are there wetlands on the site?
Yes x No
A copy of the deed (with state application
only) or other instrument under which the
applicant claims title to the affected
properties. If the applicant is not claiming to
be the owner of said property, then forward a
copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written
permission from the owner to carry out the
project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan
view and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to
scale in black ink on an 8 YZ "by 11 " white
paper. (Refer to Coastal Resources
Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a detailed`
description.)
Please note that original drawings are
preferred and only high quality copies will be
accepted. Blue-tine •pririts or;?otheir larger plats
are acceptable only if an ade4uate number of
quality copies are provided .by applicant.
(Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of
plat requirements and it must be sufficiently
detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar
with the area to the site. Include highway or
secondary road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and
the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is
necessary.*
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment
facilities.
NA

30 days in which to submit comments on the
proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the
applicant further certifies that such notice has
been provided.
Name Carolyn Carter
Address 108 Old Causeway Rd
Beaufort, NC 28516
Phone
Name Erik Stromberg. NC State Ports Authority
Address 2202 Burnett Blvd.
Wilmington. NC 28401
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits
issued for work on the project tract. Include
permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
NA -- bridge originally constructed in 1908
Q
• A check for $250 made payable to the
Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources (DEHNR) to cover the costs
of processing the application. .
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.'
• A statement of, compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C:.G.S. ,113A - to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of
public funds or use of public lands, attach a
statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
See attached sheet
6. CERTIFICATION ANp
PERMISSION TO ENTER ON
LAND '
this application will allow only the development
described in the application. The project will be
subject to conditions and restrictions contained in
the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the
proposed activity complies with the State of
North Carolina's approved Coastal Management
Program and will be conducted in a manner
consistent with such program.

I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in
fact, grant permission to representatives of state
and federal review agencies to enter on the
aforementioned lands in connection with
evaluating information related to this permit
application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in'
this application is truthful to the best of my
knowledge.
This is the 11 th day of February, 1998.
Print Name Bruce Bolick, Vice President, CZR''lnc.!
Signature a,,?
Landowner or Authorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining t6 your
proposed project.
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
_ DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
_ DCM'MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE. 'Please sign and date each attachment in
the-space provided at the'bottom -of each
form.
I understand that any permit issued in response to

BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA (4) Will all, or part of, the existing culvert
Major Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to be removed? (Explain)
complete all other sections of the Joint Application
that relate to this proposed project.
g. Length of proposed bridge 2400 ft.
1. BRIDGES h. Width of proposed bridge 12 ft,
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
NA (no wetlands present)
a. Public X Private
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing
b. Type of bridge (construction material) water flow? X Yes No
. ".Superstructure comprised of jointed rail, If yes, explain Removal of the, existing
f timber crossties crushed stone ballast and piles, and an increase inspan engths from
prestressed concrete t-beams. Substructure 6 to 30 ft. with the new bridge, should
comprised of concrete and steel piers. increase water flow,
c Water body to be crossed by bridge k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed
Newport River bridge Clearance beneath western end will
remain approximately the same as the
d. Water, depth at the proposed crossing at exiting bridge. Clearance beneath eastern
MLW or NWL 10 ft, near shore/30-40 ft, in end will increase as much as 3.5 ft. The
navigation channel of AIWW steel bascule segment will remain, hice
clearance in navigation channel will be
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing unaffected,
bridge? X Yes No
If yes, L Wilt _the proposed bridge affect navigation
(1)- Length of existing bridge 2400 ft, by reducing "or, increasing ` the existing
(2) Width of existing bridge .12 ft, navigable o.pIng? ' Yes X No
(3) Navigation clearance underneath If Yes, expo(
existing bridge average < 4 ft:
(4) Will all, or a part of, the .existing b
,. , _. -.:bridge be removed? (Explain} Trestle and
associated piles removed to just-below mud M. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands
line. Steel bascule segment will remain, containing no navigable waters?
Yes _X No
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing If yes, explain
culvert(s)? Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing cul",uert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert n. Have yott contacted the U.S. Coast Guard
above the MHW or NWL concerning their approval?
_X Yes No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
Coast Guard review in progress.
2. CULVERTS
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
c. Type of culvert (construction material,
style)
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing
bridge? Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge - (3)
Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge (4) Will
all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing
navigation potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge
or culvert require any excavation below the
MHW or NWL? _ Yes _X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
b.
e.. Will proposed culvert replace an existing
culvert? Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert (3)
Height of the top of the existing culvert c.
above. the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of'the existing culvert
be removed? (Explain)
f. Length 0: prqpose8 culvert
x
g. Width of proposed culvert
d.
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert
above the MHW or NWL. .
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing
water flow? Yes No
If yes, explain
t
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in
cubic yards
Will the placement of the proposed bridge
or culvert require any excavation within:'
- Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs -'Other
Wetlands X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated.
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in
cubic yards
Will the placement of the _proposed.bridge
or culvert require any highground
excavation?
X Yes No
If "yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated ,see
attached drawings an project descri tp ion
(2) Width of area to be 'excavated. see
attached drawings and project, description -
(3) Amount of material to beexcavated in
cubic yards 64 cubic yards
'
If the placement of the bridge-;or culvert
involves any" excavation, please "complete
the following:'
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
used as high ground fill at east end of
bridge and as backfill behind abutments
(2) Dimensions.. of spoil disposal area
see attached drawings
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
X . Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission
from the owner.
(4) Will the disposal area be available for
future maintenance? Yes NA _ No

(5)' Does the disposal area include
any coastal wetlands (marsh),
SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes X_ No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area
below the MHW or NWL?
Yes X No
If yes, give dimension if different from No.
2 above.
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge
or culvert result in any fill (other than
excavated material described in Item d.
above) to be placed below MHW or NWL?
Yes _X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled (2)
Width of area to be filled (3)
Purpose of fill
f: "Will the placement of the proposed bridge
or culvert result in any fill (other than
excavated material described in Item d.
above) to be placed within:
_ Coastal Wetlands SAVs _ Other
Wetlands X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled (2)
Width of area to be filled (3)
Purpose of fill
-g. Will;the placement of the proposed bridge
or culvert result in any fill (other than
excavated material described in Item d.
above),to be placed on highground?
Yes X No
if yes, ,
0) Length of area to be filled.
(2) `Width of area to..be filled
(3) Purpose of fill '
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any
mitigation? Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
b. Will the proposed project require the
relocation of any existing utility lines?
Yes _X No
If yes, explain in detail
c. Will the proposed project require the
construction of any temporary detour
structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
d. Will the proposed project require any work
channels? Yes X No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept
on site and erosion controlled? Fill placed
at east end of bridge will be covered with
ballast and track and become part of the
railroad bed:
f. What type of construction equipment will
be used (for example, draglinet backhoe or
hydraulic dredge)? Supply barges barge
mounted crane. barge mounted crawler
crane tug-boat, air compressors welding
machine, generators vibratory hammer pile
driver, diesel hammer pile driver, hydraulic
or?et, ba Uoe, "clam shell" bucket. and
assorted pick-up trucks
g. Will wetlands' be crossed in transporting
equipment to,project site?'
Yes "'X-_ No
If yes, explain steps,that_ will be taken to
lessen environmentaf impacts:
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge
or culvert require any shoreline
stabilization? Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
_Beaufort and Morehead Railroad Bridge
Applicant or Project Name
Signature
11 February 1998
Date

?/ Portsmo
fh0 ?'
/ u
O -coke Infer
West
Led
ar Islan v
?
Qy- OA ;% 'Srcash/rtfef'
-. SUr+O 2 J Ola
PYI? Sr
2 d i ?/ SEA
S l?fanti
K ??j??? ?Orum lnf¢(
Cc?' °> c Bettie A? i 0?t 76'00'
- --- Newport
)0
O \ ellans A I G twat Wifl4ton i` i c0?r?
( 3 <tt (c1 O
C FO EST ?C4fd a<b? 6 z/ P Smy(na '
Peletter 11 y uer _3lralts
Ace Man • ' tMarshX tberg
d%6-Pine KnollSsfiNltor?? , of fbJester j O
f e -3 / O Mu
. 'b 9pe S-/O-n .!,¦ ..... 58 i Atlantic S ?O'r Hsrk2?`EY t
z '"i,$alter - Heath rs
n \' ts`and 1/?
'Fda ._-/.' EmBrald Beach sth i N.1..e keo...err v°r I
Point Isle Beach r•1aool A,e- NjcfQ`
BngUP In(P( a.y,o 1ll-ch Al- a? yip
CA uGHiHOUSE OUT 77"00•
r
A..
r
nse 1r E W P O R . a ?./ .,a rtes
T ?. • 70
1-
-.a tw _ ' . 1 V a. ?, t r
Ly4 i
Wrld.vy .c?' 4 ? tzae'? •?I?izw
I
'- 1176
N 1171 ?/ia? ?• '% le]r
r I%i tid9 .T
yl r . a uaa Ert. EHE ° Yr?B ; 15 - fors. Mo d .
...
- I c CITY Pop. 55
70 - .
0, U :• t9 o-: ? '?:.. ?Torf Vii. :yL?:f ?\
zzz:
E ORT -
:
B A;'
•ci?+?:<__. AS _: '?.t.•EdCf MACON .'\EV a,:?? ??
ATUINTK EA
pv* SEA . M¦K E,r...sr?
v. .... .. ...... NOt(
$MOM
^ POP. 646 I
1!2Z-;11f17
aeala `
< .• ° o NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
BEAUFORT AND MOREHEAD RAILROAD
TRESTLE OVER NEWPORT RIVER BETWEEN
MOREHEAD CITY AND RADIO ISLAND
CARTERET COUNTY P-3100
VICINITY MAP FIG. 1
x°'%%? /
:1 w

?z°w _
0 .0,
E- ?w
01 14
•`3 zFt=1t1.W Cd 94
f- 0 10
'r wawaa ° E2
)))
Ile
BeaufortChann + ^ cd •` t `'?
m
,t
m c `?•J if ^aNo t.
GQ .rti 1° /
?? , ..,?/?{{fin `` '\ ?? ? r r ? ?..?' l ? ° C ? 0'
Butichead,
E
• • ' ' ?t
r _
73 -
,Rw r-
-- !.j
-tkII
ry(
v
f 17?o
Y
\•- Q m a
? , 3e a v
0
t
o-
O M
,I
i' -
II
I
I
0
it
r.
;• I I
I o U
i JJ
' l
-ll
N
J
z
Z N
J
o °
hoc ?
O ow
l
ado a w
5
w
aoc?g wza:

O z
ak.6
?zo a0Q
o U''.
?
ooI U Z
P Et)
zw aowa o

E- ad m
93
w Da U
F a
Z ? Z
d ? -

A

t
N Z
Z

-
C
I
w
(
N ?
?
?
{¢
Z W
?

T QCI OF
JUr
4
U ?
N
U
o } ? u
2
O
3
?
W i F H m
?i
y
Z ? a6t
?
'
?
a g ?<6zgoN
?am
Z

U
??
? O ?V
N
D
g O
OW
Z
s
gig

W
? _
N yJ 2R'O -.
Y3 ??
m g
. Z
U
.=
N
=O
e
z za NWa$
A4 7G;
8a
W _
VO DYO •?V fi
DVO V?
?
Q m m
W
N
O P

n'
u

'O yS, ?N ? ?ZV W.
f
~
? K?
qF n ? d ? ?z2??c
z
?
. z z z
? -
YS
!{J
. c
?
I W
c
N
W L1 y?
?
Y
N v
aU V
O
O 1
W yp
?¢
-yc O ¢ri$cm
_ ? o
O
dd
3
Z
o
Y
tl
O
(U?
-_- Y
r
qQQ?`?''
1W
?
-
O >
Z
m WPt6 ..y I=???Q
x
NO
ff
JU
?????
4 ?33
a
?
?¢;
OY?
'9
a
0 x Jx?Q
$ ?
Gizh??
nt??''
?z z
n?
aga
3Y?
oV?
N N -N/1 v Y1Pn
Match L -

l _
rl
UI
v? I

a

m ?

I

i

C
C
+

J CL
R

- O

+
Z a = N
> m
4-
4

•

n ? ? O
- n N O

v n _ j N

z a
> m

o
I o
_
o 0
N
Q -
I?

O
j d +
6 0?

_ O .
+
m

0
0
n

°n

? a
y
0
- o
+

x 10

z
u -
o

-
O
N
?

I o
I'
a 2

a

' O O O? N? Q O O
V1 ?D O
I? O
m O Q
O• •-•
I
° ? ?
? ???g G ('V

o

a
?
C
n 4-4

O

O 'y g
1 ? e
N W f

o
0 0
N 0
T-
M
0
o
+
cu
N /1
LL
ID

.. u (Ll
o»? >
emu=
u=?
z i•°n
moi
W
ooZ
22I ?.
?xx

C«

L`•
t h
e4 4 0
0
v
0

a ?
3

1
1

I
O?
I >

19•-O'
2 z 6'
DRAIN OPEN
NG
(TYP. EA SIDE)
in
1
w
CONST. -m
(TYP. EA. SIDE)
8'-0' 6'-0'
2'-6' 2'-10' 2'-6' B'
STEM (E BRIDGE I STE"
do VOID Ac TRACK TOP OF RAIL do VUID

a I m I n

da
a,
+d++++ a +a+?+
+++++i ++d F+++ °6

++++?.° +a+a E+
....p++ it++++
1'-4' 1'-4' 1'-4' t'-4'
1-10' 2'-8' i-8' 1-6' 2'-8' 1-10'
CAST CURB AFTER
RELEASE OF PRESTRESS
if7
O
I
iV
NOTE (+) INDICATES STRAND LOCATION

PROPOSED
!. 'TYPICAL SEC11ON NOTE. (+) INDICATES STRAND LOCATION
, i wsm0N SPANS O
p9UTMENTS & BASCULE)
JL
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
"
`. TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
S PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
BEAUFORT AND MOREHEAD RAILROAD
TRESTLE OVER NEWPORT RIVER BETWEEN
MORI,IIEAD CITY AND RADIO ISLAND
CARTERET COUNTY P-3100
PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION FIG. 5
12'-0"
Morchead
= 0 ?y

WAITS OF EXCAVATION --
?+--- T PROPOSED WEST ABUTMENT
RAILROAD LwsnNG
do PROPOSED
2'-0' i 2'-0'

PLAN_ Mf W t?- EXCAtl.A-nQN. WEST ASUIMEN1..
Newport
IQ+ ver

h+- t PROPOSE6 WEST ABUTMENT
/- EXISTING EMBANKMENT
msnrG k PROPQSED T/k
4L lue,w o
Mo?ehead
• r /
{ so 8'-0" TO MIDPOIN OF
?b OPE
TOTAL VOLUME OF EXCAVAnory
W WEST ABUTMENT
r 1152 tt3
-Q" 2'-0" i - 42.7 ay.
NOTE; 0 FILL RETARED .
d WEST EN
SECTION THkQlJQK-=AY-A TlQN 1 ST A13UTMENT
It F0
rt-
12'-0"
?jele, ok-f-'
k (
LIMITS OF EXCAVATION 1
I
q. PROPOSED EAST ABUTMENT
1
RAILROAD EXISTING 71i
do PROPOSED I
-o' 2'-D'

P
Q
Rcdi o
Ts I a'sd
I
N
I ?
f
0
I
N
PROPOSED EAST ABUTMENT---------i
12'-0' FILL FACE EAST
ABUTMENT (PROPOSED)
EX1SitNG EMSANKMCNT ti - PROPOSED T/R I
EXISTING T/R 1-1'-8 1/4'
--- - - - Acid 1' 0
i y
Newport is t44d
-ve
8'-d' TO MIDPOINT OF SLOPE I.A
TOTAL VOLUME OF EXCAVATION
® EAST ABUTMENT
" 4'(4'X 4')tl'(o')(24') /
570 ft
= 21.3 cy 2'-0' 2'-0'
NOTE: SEE NEXT SHEET FOR FILL ZONE. , 4 0'
E -nQN TMRDUGH EXCAVATION. 0 EAST ABUTM NT
Wow 8
8" Fort cte,4

o
9 CL
n
F
V)
I?
c?
^s^
G
.- cs a _I
b b U: v l
1 I C?
m
C4 o o it
a9
1
+.. ' 0141;
Ol0'L-
i 114 li ? ..
O
IWW
F- T
gill,
oa•c.
TOR
O L
Ott s
d.... di. d '.. 4io t'sa+ d
oss-a: c?
5?+ OWL
' 00+4 S
I
`.. Oc0l0 L,SLt££
01.0 L_iOS+££
ti N