Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310088_Inspection_20190726Division of Water Resources Facility Number - ; , 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 11 O'. 10 Departure Time: / a ' County: Ih,1) ► ^ Farm Name: �d(A1 f, l_'f''} ✓�Y`' Owner Email: Owner Name: Gf l C— 1 , �—_G✓rA-i t^-1�'1C Phone: Mailing Address: 0 -:,,,j� I V Nc l l ya�eV(QL)2 tLe , ;V c O` SJ C Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: Onsite Representative: /� r Certified Operator: F �- V ✓ I f" ✓� Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Swine Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feedej Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Other Latitude: Region: "t o Phone: 1l Integrator: s'T�t�t � (^ e C Ql Certification Number: 7 -� 0 5 Certification Number: Design Current Design Current Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Raer Non -Layer Design Current nry Pnultry Canacitv Pon. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Longitude: Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Cow —.Dairy Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes [:]�o 0 NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ N E 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: - I Date of inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Freeboard O Observed (in): , 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Ea No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the *structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes P�No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [-]Yes No NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): �� 1 ✓ l9 13. Soil Type(s): &tr V j t' LL 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements [:]Yes [fNo ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes To ❑NA ❑NE ❑NA ❑NE DNA ❑NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑ Yes [21<o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Yes o ❑NA ❑NE ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [;No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [—]Yes [:]No dj'NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: - 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0io ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes I IiIVo ❑ NA ❑ NE `�' the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 2<o ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No [?iA ❑ NE Other Issues ZNo 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 3/No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE V permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EZ'No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #) Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). 2o) cl C cc �,- q.-E �,.� I a Z- S )-i t 1 , 3 1.35 y -S �1 wl , r,�ti crox__