20191369 Ver 1_Public Notice_20191023

US Army Corps PUBLIC NOTICE
Of Engineers
Wilmington District
Issue Date: October 23, 2019
Comment Deadline: November 21, 2019
Corps Action ID Number: SAW-2018-00053
The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) received an application from Gaston
County Department of Public Works seeking Department of the Army authorization to impact
1,881.5 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel and 0.40 acre of jurisdictional impoundments
associated with the expansion of Gaston County Landfill in Gaston County, North Carolina.
Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached plans.
This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington District Web Site
at http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ue 1�atoryPermitPro re a�m.aspx
Applicant: Gaston County Department of Public Works
Attn: Ray Maxwell
PO Box 1578
Gastonia, North Carolina 28053
AGENT (if applicable):
Authority
HDR
Attn: Kelly Thames
404 S. Church Street, Suite 900
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
The Corps evaluates this application and decides whether to issue, conditionally issue, or deny
the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of the following Statutory Authorities:
® Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S. C. 1344)
❑ Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U. S.C. 403)
❑ Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33
U.S.C.1413)
Version 6.15.2017 Page 1

Location
Location Description:
Project Area (acres):
Nearest Waterway:
Latitude and Longitude
Existing Site Conditions
424
South Fork Catawba River
35.386384' N,-81.174992' W
Nearest Town: Dallas, NC
River Basin: South Fork Catawba
The project is located in the piedmont physiographic region of North Carolina and encompasses
424 acres of land in Gaston County. The project area is approximately 47% landfill, 35%
forested land, consisting of mixed medium aged hardwoods, 7.5% is developed for a commercial
business park, 5% consists of corn crop fields, 4.5% as a yard waste facility, and 1% is
maintained as residential use. Within the 424-acre project area, 321 acres is the area permitted
for landfill uses, of which 60.4% is landfill, 29% is forested, 5.6% is the yard waste facility, and
4% is the commercial business park. The remaining 1% is Philadelphia Church Road, which
bisects the permitted landfill boundary. Surrounding land use is rural residential and agricultural,
with a patchy landscape of discontinuous forested areas. The South Fork Catawba River flows in
a southeast direction along the southwestern project boundary. Hoyle Creek flows south along
the northeastern project boundary. Jurisdictional aquatic resources within the project area include
9 unnamed tributaries, 6 wetlands, and 4 ponds draining to the South Fork Catawba River and 5
unnamed tributaries and 4 wetlands draining to Hoyle Creek.
Applicant's Stated Purpose
The purpose of the project is to utilize the existing landfill and construct Unit I, Phase 2 and Unit
III to combine them with the existing Unit I, Phase 1 and Unit II disposal units to final build out
of the landfill, which would provide an estimated capacity of 20 years or more.
Project Description
The proposed project would involve the expansion of the existing Gaston County Landfill within
its permitted boundary. It would involve the construction of a municipal solid waste (MSW) Unit
III cell, located between MSW Units I and II in the central portion of the landfill. Subsequently,
construction of Unit III would then allow for the construction of Unit I, Phase 2, which would
connect all of Units I, 11, and III for final proposed limits of the MSW cell. The activity would
result in the loss of 280 linear feet of low quality perennial stream channel and 865 linear feet of
low quality intermittent stream channel for a total of 1,145 linear feet of stream channel and 0.40
acres of Pond 1. No wetlands would be impacted by the proposed activity. The proposed project
would also permit unauthorized activities that occurred between 2006 and 2008, requiring an
After -the -Fact Permit for 736.5 linear feet of perennial stream channel. The total impacts include
1,881.5 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel and 0.40 acre jurisdictional pond impacts.
Version 6.15.2017 Page 2

Avoidance and Minimization
The applicant provided the following information in support of efforts to avoid and/or minimize
impacts to the aquatic environment:
According to the applicant, the applicant's preferred alternative would avoid impacts to 11,052
linear feet of stream channel, 5.27 acres of wetlands, and 1.25 acres of ponds. Approximately
80% of the avoided streams (8,992.5 If), 87% of wetlands (4.6 ac.), and 17.5% of ponds (0.22 ac)
are located within, and are protected by, the buffer and setback regulatory controls that limit the
locality of landfill disposal units within a landfill boundary. Discussed in the criteria for
evaluating alternatives, local zoning or land use ordinances, state, or federal rules and/or laws set
forth these buffers and setbacks.
NC General Statute § 130A-295.61 prohibits waste disposal units within FEMA floodplains.
North Carolina Administrative Code 15A NCAC 13B .16002 requires a minimum 300-foot
buffer between a disposal unit and all property lines and roads, and a minimum 500-foot buffer
between a disposal unit and all residences and drinking wells. These regulations are more
restrictive or equal to those listed for landfills in Gaston County's Unified Development
Ordinance 3. Error! Reference source not found. summarizes the regulatory buffers and
setbacks required in determining placement of a disposal unit within a landfill. The 100-foot
buffer around the existing on -site cemetery was a voluntary setback put in place by the landfill
during original development to preserve the feature.
Table 1. Regulatory constraints
Constraint
Width (ft)
Property Boundary Setback
300 ft
Permitted Landfill Boundary
Setback
300 ft
Residential Structures Buffer
500 ft
Road Buffer
300 ft
Cemetery Buffer
100 ft
FEMA Features
Avoid
The applicant has considered alternatives including a no -build option, constructing a new landfill
elsewhere, and a new on -site cell location in order to avoid impacts to jurisdictional stream
channels located within Unit III as described in the Environmental Assessment. Construction
equipment and heavy machinery that would be utilized to build Unit III already have a dedicated
space located in uplands for their storage and maintenance. Additional minimization measures
include sediment and erosion controls that would be used to protect downstream waters. The
Gaston County Landfill has been, and is currently, covered under the National Pollutant
1 httns://www.ncleg.net/enactedlegislation/statutes/html/bvchapter/chanter 130a.html
2 North Carolina Administrative Code. httv:Hreports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20%20environmental%20guality/chanter%2013%20-
%20solid%20waste%20management/subchapter%20b/subchapter%20b%20rules.ndf
s Gaston County Board of Commission. April 2008. Gaston County Unified Development Ordinance.
httns://Iibrarv.municode.com/nc/gaston countv/codes/unified development ordinance
Version 6.15.2017 Page 3

Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit Number NCG120000 for Landfills
(Certificate of Coverage No. NCG120012 effective 11/l/2018, expires 10/31/2021) as issued by
the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) Division of Energy,
Mineral, and Land Resources (NCDEMLR). This coverage includes a Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPP) and periodic water quality monitoring to monitor site discharge and
runoff as required by the general permit. A Section 401 Individual Water Quality Permit is being
submitted concurrently with this IP application.
Compensatory Mitigation
The applicant offered the following compensatory mitigation plan to offset unavoidable
functional loss to the aquatic environment:
There are no active private mitigation banks within Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03050102;
therefore, the applicant proposes compensatory mitigation for all permanent impacts through the
purchase of stream and wetland mitigation credits from the North Carolina Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS). The applicant provided supporting documentation from DMS in a
letter dated August 19, 2019, indicating that they are willing to accept compensatory mitigation
payment for 1,881.5 linear feet of stream impacts and 0.40 acre of non -riparian wetland (for
pond impacts) within the South Fork Catawba Sub -Basin within the Catawba River Basin
(03050102). Proposed compensatory mitigation ratios are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Propose mitigation ratios.
Impact #
Feature
Ratio
Amount of
Credits
Im act
Proposed
Seasonal RPW
Impact 1
1.5:1
848 if
1,272
Stream 1
Perennial RPW
Impact 2
1.5:1
2801f
420
Stream 1
Seasonal RPW
Impact 3
1.5:1
171f
25.5
Stream 2
Impact 4
Pond 1
0.5:1
0.40 ac.
0.25
Unauthorized
Perennial RPW
Impacts
Stream 1
2:1
736.5
1,473
Stream Credits:
1,881.51f
3,190.5
Wetland Credits:
0.4 ac.
0.25
Essential Fish Habitat
Pursuant to the Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, this Public
Notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements. The Corps' initial
determination is that the proposed project would not effect EFH or associated fisheries managed
by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National Marine
Fisheries Service.
Version 6.15.2017 Page 4

Cultural Resources
Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Appendix C of 33
CFR Part 325, and the 2005 Revised Interim Guidance for Implementing Appendix C, the
District Engineer consulted district files and records and the latest published version of the
National Register of Historic Places and initially determines that:
❑ Should historic properties, or properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register, be
present within the Corps' permit area; the proposed activity requiring the DA permit (the
undertaking) is a type of activity that will have no potential to cause an effect to an
historic properties.
® No historic properties, nor properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register, are
present within the Corps' permit area; therefore, there will be no historic properties
affected. The Corps subsequently requests concurrence from the SHPO (or THPO).
❑ Properties ineligible for inclusion in the National Register are present within the Corps'
permit area; there will be no historic properties affected by the proposed work. The Corps
subsequently requests concurrence from the SHPO (or THPO).
❑ Historic properties, or properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register, are
present within the Corps' permit area; however, the undertaking will have no adverse
effect on these historic properties. The Corps subsequently requests concurrence from the
SHPO (or THPO).
❑ Historic properties, or properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register, are
present within the Corps' permit area; moreover, the undertaking may have an adverse
effect on these historic properties. The Corps subsequently initiates consultation with the
SHPO (or THPO).
❑ The proposed work takes place in an area known to have the potential for the presence of
prehistoric and historic cultural resources; however, the area has not been formally
surveyed for the presence of cultural resources. No sites eligible for inclusion in the
National Register of Historic Places are known to be present in the vicinity of the
proposed work. Additional work may be necessary to identify and assess any historic or
prehistoric resources that may be present.
The District Engineer's final eligibility and effect determination will be based upon coordination
with the SHPO and/or THPO, as appropriate and required, and with full consideration given to
the proposed undertaking's potential direct and indirect effects on historic properties within the
Corp s-indentified permit area.
Version 6.15.2017 Page 5

Endangered Species
Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Corps reviewed the project area, examined
all information provided by the applicant and consulted the latest North Carolina Natural
Heritage Database. Based on available information:
❑ The Corps determines that the proposed project would not affect federally listed
endangered or threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat.
❑ The Corps determines that the proposed project may affect federally listed endangered or
threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat.
❑ The Corps initiates consultation under Section 7 of the ESA and will not make a
permit decision until the consultation process is complete.
❑ The Corps will consult under Section 7 of the ESA and will not make a permit
decision until the consultation process is complete.
❑ The Corps has initiated consultation under Section 7 of the ESA and will not make a
permit decision until the consultation process is complete.
❑ The Corps determines that the proposed project may affect federally listed endangered or
threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat. Consultation has been
completed for this type of activity and the effects of the proposed activity have been
evaluated and/or authorized by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) in the
South Atlantic Regional Biological Opinion or its associated documents, including
7(a)(2) & 7(d) analyses and Critical Habitat assessments. A copy of this public notice
will be sent to the NMFS.
® The Corps is not aware of the presence of species listed as threatened or endangered or
their critical habitat formally designated pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973
(ESA) within the project area. The Corps will make a final determination on the effects of
the proposed project upon additional review of the project and completion of any
necessary biological assessment and/or consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service and/or National Marine Fisheries Service.
Other Required Authorizations
The Corps forwards this notice and all applicable application materials to the appropriate State
agencies for review.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR): The Corps will generally not make a
final permit decision until the NCDWR issues, denies, or waives the state Certification as
required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500). The receipt of the application and
this public notice, combined with the appropriate application fee, at the NCDWR Central Office
Version 6.15.2017 Page 6

in Raleigh constitutes initial receipt of an application for a 401 Certification. A waiver will be
deemed to occur if the NCDWR fails to act on this request for certification within sixty days of
receipt of a complete application. Additional information regarding the 401 Certification may be
reviewed at the NCDWR Central Office, 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit, 512 North Salisbury
Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260. All persons desiring to make comments regarding
the application for a 401 Certification should do so, in writing, by November 21, 2019 to:
NCDWR Central Office
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins, 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
(LISPS mailing address): 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Or,
(Physical address): 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM):
❑ The application did not include a certification that the proposed work complies with and
would be conducted in a manner that is consistent with the approved North Carolina Coastal
Zone Management Program. Pursuant to 33 CFR 325.2 (b)(2) the Corps cannot issue a
Department of Army (DA) permit for the proposed work until the applicant submits such a
certification to the Corps and the NCDCM, and the NCDCM notifies the Corps that it
concurs with the applicant's consistency certification. As the application did not include the
consistency certification, the Corps will request, upon receipt„ concurrence or objection from
the NCDCM.
® Based upon all available information, the Corps determines that this application for a
Department of Army (DA) permit does not involve an activity which would affect the coastal
zone, which is defined by the Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Act (16 U.S.C. § 1453).
Evaluation
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts
including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will
reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit
which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its
reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be
considered including the cumulative effects thereof, among those are conservation, economics,
aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife
values, flood hazards, flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use,
navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water
quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of
property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving
the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of the
impact of the activity on the public interest will include application of the Environmental
Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines.
Version 6.15.2017 Page 7

Commenting Information
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies
and officials, including any consolidated State Viewpoint or written position of the Governor;
Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this
proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to
determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this
decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water
quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed above.
Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the
overall public interest of the proposed activity.
Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a
public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a public hearing will be
granted, unless the District Engineer determines that the issues raised are insubstantial or there is
otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing.
The Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District will receive written comments pertinent to the
proposed work, as outlined above, until 5pm, November 21, 2019. Comments should be
submitted to David L. Shaeffer, Asheville Regulatory Field Office, 151 Patton Avenue, Room
208, Asheville, North Carolina 28801, at [phone].
Version 6.15.2017 Page 8

LEGEND
a
Gaston County Landfill
Property (424 ac.)
�o
w
�
0 Miles 1
n
r
is
a
L W C,'JL N
['A510N�
High
Shoals
ar
�a
; a
$ Alexs E�4hghn��
p
00 Harv�mQ-' •
Rd
n
a
�d
y
�
P
n
Fc
G
ra
Ar
o�
ram,
�rr
ifs'
rhnrryhtir�
�
O'Af
G��k
,*Park Rrr
2
}33 21
b
n�❑
`�
L
6
ee
4
x
�
N �
ra��r
obvo!
Gaston County, NC r
1
Figure 1. Project Location

gyp.-- \. yt - 'i•
t LEGEND
Xr _
Gaston County Landfill (424 ao )
— f /
Q USGS Quadrangles
T
SOURCE: USES 7.5 minute quad, Lincolnton EaSL NC (1993)--
1 inch = 4,000 feet
4 0 Feet ,0(JO `,'
�'". i��.1r'f.�
Y�
Fanny Hill �N Philadelphia
Road Church Road .
w,.
Nt
ffi+
_ �
d
II
A
4,� w 1
Gaston County,
North Carolina
tr:
FigureQuadrangles

Figure 3. Gaston County Landfill Property Ownership

LEGEND
Permitted Landfill
Boundary (.321 ac.)
Gaston County t-andili
._ Property (424 ac.)
- Facilily Structures
Residential Structures ..-
All Buffers I Setbacks r
Constraints r%
- - - Seasonal RPW
Perennial RPW
Pond
i Wetlands
ss Culvert
T FEMA Floodway
FEMA 100-Yr Floodplain
FEMA 5DD-Yr Flo0dpialn
I no = 1.000 t 1
r— — — — — — - —
Feet 1,000
Pre -Subtitle 0 x x x
x a F x x n x
x x x x x z
fir. x x x x x }• x >�
x n x x Y � 'l ,t� I�•.
xa� �,yltflr� x'.
Y � ` tlf�llt�li x. x
�! x
I
x
R
x
X
x
xx%xxx
• iijl ! I I J�l� [
,t:`
= x. % x x
!Y.
.�
x x x w
x, x
x x
xxk'
.. x x x
x _.
i/
Figure 4. Gaston County Landfill Site Layout
LEGEND
Permitted Landfitl T„
Boundary (321 ac }
y Gaston County Landfill
Property (424 ac.)
b
_ Facility Structures
Residential Structures All Butlers I Setbacks I _
- Constraints Ilk"
Stream Impacts
Pond Impacts >
- - Seasonal RPW
— Perennial RPW
Wetlands
Pond
�- Culvert
FEMA Floodway
FEMA 100-Yr Floodplain
n FEMA 500-Yr Floodplain
I i�cn = r,000 ke1
0 Feet t,000
Figure 5. Preferred Alternative Site Layout — Impacts Overview
LANDFILL AREAS
pc Closed - Construction
pemolftn Waste Limits
r•{�Closed - Municipal Solid
,^/ante Limits
Active Construction &
DemolMon Wasle Limits
Proposed Final Munlctpal
Solid Waste Limits
y- ;y Active Municipal Solid
Waste Limits
At Capacity Municipal
Solid Waste Limits
<,
+smWa�me� lm yas
'mlWtn Tva
•ppre�wa Pnnman..T
A And JO And
ieesnei lllTll �n
B65 0
A.nmWI PPW Pn
� 6
WNemA lec.l
0 P
•e.w ye.l
0. 6
Tae1 Steam
Ie--In
.. 1as 11 6
T..1N,W"
6 6
MFy+-00
'7�1►aM
.. Nswctlhnl
K4 0
LANDFII-L. AREAS
Preferred Alt - Proposed
Final Municipal Solid
fVaste Limits
Closed - Construction &
Demolition Waste Limits
Cldsed • Municipal Solid
t!!W ; Baste Llmils
Active Construcilon &
Demolltlan Waste Limits
Active Municipal Solid
y Waste Limits
Inactive Municipal Solid
_c 1

�I+�:�IirR�Isi!J�ri{I�a�+tj�ttj✓'Iyj`� jj�,�yfj� yljfxl
e+ ftj✓✓it/tyjjylyjj+f�y+✓*tij✓II ,gerox ln.r inp..b
'! ✓tt
LEGEND yt�✓tjy+ty{, jly✓+j✓I APw.�n p,.un�.�
4Fy� j{✓j✓jjt✓jjj� tjtjejj aor.,n..rTp. law., JD A.
rd All Constraints trraiR s 5@Thacks y�flyl+;�*4�;y`
r � �', s,�t♦r,,.
f� Stream Impacts y�I P-1.1p,Pw{Ifl No a
PandImpacts 0ylj��� �� wauer.�i.cp a a
.� 'jttjj✓ljjtyr.,t yj! Pond f=y o.. u
✓+ - Seasonal RPW •+ iij+40ij� T.adi sve.m 1.145 lr o
r tyy tjj ✓Ijy ✓f - .I W.d
°
— Perennial RPW Iij IE'f�t Ir+ n�p�a..io a
JIMM
•ii++ty�jjtj�j�; ""°� ToiulE 0
f1Pond j l+Ijjj✓t� � im1,�.le, �
- Wetlands
a Culvert +,� :irart 2 Sea onaff_
�nrfi-3nP 1e9 Perennial RPW 1 Perenrata jj� lt:i
r — — — — — — — - — 1 280 It of impact (fill) Break
0 Feel 30@ ,+fjr .Sea9onae RPVV I
848 If of impact (fill)
Impacts LANDFILLAREAS
{� f Seasonal RPW 2
+ +see, i{ {.. 17 If of impact t fill', Preterrad Alt •Proposed
}�yjjt{jy Final Municipal Solid
nr rrrt y jj{+r, Waste Limits
t+s_ Closed • Constructlon E
Demolition Waste Limits
. j✓✓rjy+Ay{,/r+II jy/l+ylrl
! _ II ,t�y"rlj1000, y+J�'f+yt�iryyll� iJ2tmDIItC'Ion5Waste Limits
7171
... i ijAcive
y a5" fjjjtiiy+�rjj{Ijjt✓tjtyttjjjtj Closed-MunicipalSalid
1i11LE33Y
ii+ tt+{Ij�jtyjytjj�y j jt�� Write Limits
_ Impact 4 ty�jyjt*y�jyyjry+ j jam,
✓t y+J'I i+✓I i+•✓ x x Active Municipal Solid
x
Pond 1 ItP+✓ram`✓Jr.i•✓t+� , � x Waste Limb
11.4010. (fiilj +to;+✓fj I{!�✓!y fit+
- - -- Itjy{t jityjir+jji� WasteLmilscipalSolid
x , A. _' j✓j{ijlyi j✓Iijiy iyjtr y Not Yet Constructed
�+s►"�✓+ fii+�ji, #�°yam*fiji "
Figure 6. Proposed Impacts
LEGEND fjjf� f x xi' x x an.rre *rP. .ro..n
All Suffers 7 Setbacks! IMPACTS fy f,✓ x x x x
� If
Constraints Proposed Stream Impacts 6,,r$xxxxxxxx
j SITE RESOURCES C Proposed Pond Impacts p*0t x x xij1 x
�
Seasonal RPW Unauthorized Impacts '-•� j✓ , r x x x x 3Y5''��m...nr .rn N9
+ — Perennial RPW Culvert installation x xxx X X*neen.rr inq'PM1 r+es
E* - Unauthorized Impacts for x x tiwn ene<ntr
Pond Impoundment x x x X Pnpw`ao-..m
�j Vktlands nG 3on10 x r
� xxxx xxx e w.ee"a rmwmm o x
►i -.-.. mwbi. i
t't, �
acF
`;� ,� coal Pora Pnwaelec.i .. x
51i u x�xXxXxxxX
,. reran a RPW 1�t+a 848 1f na impact(fill)4: <xxxx
r J
_80 If of Impact (fill) 1 _ jttj+ P x x
jj t t+«r ( 2:1 ratio stream credits) x
2:1 ratio (stream credit �Jy��etj�f #
t r
_ t Break Impact #3 1967 LANDFILL PERMIT
yr�*++* Seasonal RPW 2 APPROVAL
!yr✓t{j 17 If of impact (fill) Closed-Consnucticn s
Unauthorized Impact +, jy +ytt{ 2.1 ratio (stream credits) s Demolition Waste Limits
Perennial RPW 1 tjIj!♦{t�{j iepal5olldM
r,- 433.25 LF of impact + jj�✓ijf� fr{��lJj��rji��t�� waste Limits
(unauthorized impoundment) 1997 LANDFILL PERMIT
" 2:1 ratio (stream credits) _ Unauthorized Impact ,r EXPANSION APPROVAL
and
Perennial RPW 1 Active construction &
303,25 LF of impact Demolition waste Limits
Impact #4 i' (unauthorized culvert installation) •� Proposed Final Municipal
m
Pond 1 Yam_ 2.1 ratio (streacredits) Solid Waste Limits
0.40 ac. of impact (fill) 'to ,✓✓r41 ✓t Active Municipal Solid
0-5:1 ratio (wetland Credo,P�Iy��✓rji�✓yj*�ty�'+Ij�j � waste Limits
,,- _I+j✓Iy++lly`✓tI tjljyjtij
Z< - i✓{{j t+fjytj)�r+I+pJj�' Inactive Municipal Solid
�` i i s%y'r✓dijfitj+jjt�d't{i". - '*.' ��t� Waste tirnils
Figure 7. Proposed Impacts and Unauthorized Impacts that Previously Occurred

24" OPERATIONAL COVER
GEOCOMPOSITE COMPACTED SOIL LINER
GEOMEMDRANE STRUCTURAL FILL
W
•..,r.,I...��...,I.�r.,i.,r....�..�r.,...i•�..`.., .. ■.. �.. �.. fir. �.. �.. �.. �.. ��
#57 STONE -j
PERFORATED 6" l 2' ` 10 OZ/SY
SCH 80 PVC PIPE I`^ GEOTEXTILE
CAD 1 % MIN. SLOPE
VARIES (SEE NOTE 1)
NQT:
I. WIDTH TO BE AS WIDE AS WET AREA
1 11K1nCr)nr7 A IA! r-%Ir-%r- MrrA I,
NTS
Figure 8. Cross Section of Fill

Figure 9. Adjoining Property Ownership