NCS000155_Inspection Report_20190427

Permit: NCS000155
SOC:
County: Lee
Region: Raleigh
Contact Person: Dib Paul
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 10/01/08 Expiration: 09/30/13 Owner: Gkn Driveline
Effective: Expiration: Facility: GKN Sanford
4901 Womack Rd
Inspection Date: 0412712019
Primary Inspector: Lauren Garcia
Secondary Inspector(s):
Title:
Entry Time: 12 00AM
Reason for Inspection: Routine
Permit Inspection Type: Stormwater Discharge, Individual
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Sanford NC 27330
Phone: [phone]
Certification: Phone:
Exit Time: 12.00AM
Phone: [phone]
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Page 1 of 4

Permit: NCS000155 Owner -Facility: Gkn Driveline
Inspection Date: 04/27/20113 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
It should be noted the facility's EHS Specialist and original point of contact, Christopher Blaine, was suddenly made
unavailable to the facility, closely following the beginning of the renewal process in April 2019. Due to a serious illness,
Christopher Blaine was forced to take multiple months of medical leave. During this time, the Division was not notified of the
temporary change in personnel and continued with renewal processes and compliance inspection.
A copy of the permit and certificate of coverage was not available onsite.
Monitoring data was not available upon request at the site, except for approximately three lab analytical reports, dated 2017,
2018, and 2019. The site contact was unable to provide any Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) for the current permit
term (2008-2019)-
The SWPPP has not been updated since 2017.
Responsible Parties and Employee training records were present in the SWPPP, accurate through 2017: however, as stated
above, requested documents could not be provided. This was observed to be because remaining personnel were unaware of
the document locations.
The exact location of Outfall 001 was also left undetermined. Several possible Outfall 001s were observed during the site
visit.
The Division is in receipt of only three DMRs, two from 2015 and one from 2016.
The facility was asked to provide all DMRs and monitoring data from the current permit term during the site visit. As stated
above, monitoring data was not available upon request at the site, except for approximately three lab analytical reports.
When prompted, the site contact slated the facility was under the impression Pace Analytical, the lab handling the facility's
analytical testing, was sending the Division the required DMRs.
The Division has no records of receiving DMRs from Pace Analytical, or any other lab, associated with the facility.
All materials, machinery, and tanks were stored/located within proper secondary containment and/or storm -resistant
shelters.
The site appeared to be clean and well maintained.
The outfalls appeared to be clear of debris and were well maintained.
Page 2 of 4

• i
Permit: NCS000155 Owner - Facility: Gkn Driveline
Inspection Date: 0412712019 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
1:10 ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a -Narrative Description of Practices'?
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
E El El El
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑ El 0
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑ 11
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
E ❑
# Does the Plan -nclude a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
0 El El El
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
0❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
0 ❑ ❑ El
Comment
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment: The facility contact, James McBride, claimed the facility has conducted its qualitative monitorin
semi-annually: however, documentation was not available onsite. DEQ has no records of
qualitative monitoring data.
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? E1 ❑ ❑ E
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? 1:1 El N El
Comment: The facility contact James McBride claimed the facility has conducted its analytical monitoring,
however documentation was not available onsite except for three lab analytical reports, from
2017 2018 and 2019. DEQ has no records of qualitative monitoring data except for three
DRMs from 2016 and 2016. When prompted, the facility,contact stated the facility was under the
impression that the lab sends the DMRs to DEQ.
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? El 0
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? [l ❑ E El
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ■ 0 ❑ El
Page 3 of 4

permit: NCS000155 Owner - Facility:Gkn Drrveime
Inspection Date: 04127/2019 Inspection Type : Compl once Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Comment: The facility contact was unaware of the exact location of Outfall 001. Several possible Outfall
001s were observed during the site visit.
Page 4 of 4