20191435 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20191018

DWR
U1*1on Qf wxter Reyvurccs
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance into the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20191435
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
COIrrESY COPY - DENC Johnson Pond Road Pipeline
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Robert Schwartz
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
10/18/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Middle Creek
Basin
Meuse
Water Classification
27-43-15-(4)
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.642310'
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-78.742419'
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable ureters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
rJ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r- Regional General Permit (RGP)
r- Standard (IP)
Version# *
1
Reviewing Office*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
P 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
12 - Utility Lines
le. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
fJ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
f Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
C Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
r Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
See list provided via upload
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
Dominion Energy Southeast Services
2d.Address
Street Address
220 Operations Way, MC C221
Address Line 2
city
Cayce
Postal / Zip Code
29033
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Robert Schwartz, PE
State / Rovince / R�gion
South Carolina
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
O Yes f No
C Yes r No

3b. Business Name:
Dominion Energy Southeast Services
3c.Address
Street Address
220 Operations Way, MC C221
Address Line 2
city
Cayce
Postal / Zip Cade
29033
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Joey Lawler
4b. Business Name:
S&ME, Inc.
4c. Address
Street Address
9751 Southern Pine Blvd
Address Line 2
city
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28273
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Johnson Pond Road Agent Authorization Form_Signed.pdf
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality / town:
Fuquay Varina
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
See List
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Johnson Pond Road
Address Line 2
City
Fuquay Varina
Postal / Zip Code
27526
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Middle Creek
State / Province / Plagm
South Carolina
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
State / Province / P agion
North Carolina
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
2b. Property size:
2.0
State / Province / Po9an
North Carolina
Country
USA
435.75KB
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
27-43-15-(4)

3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
03020201
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site consists primarily of the existing NCDOT ROW. Smaller portions of the project area will deviate from the ROW and cross private property adjacent to the ROW. The adjacent
land consists of forested area and residential development.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Figure 2 - USGS Exhibit.pdf
423.64KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Figure 3 - Soils Exhibit.pdf 440.16KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.0
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
30
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
To install a natural gas distribution pipeline that Will serve DENC customers in the vicinity.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The pipeline will be installed within a new 10-foot wide permanent easement. Additional temporary workspace sufficient to accommodate an HDD rig that will install bored segments of
the pipe will also be required at several locations.
Construction of the new pipeline will first involve demarcation of clearing limits, jurisdictional boundaries, and other associated workspaces, etc. Appropriate erosion and sedimentation
control (E&SC) measures will be installed as clearing proceeds to prevent sedimentation of adjacent jurisdictional features. No grubbing or below -ground vegetation removal will occur
within wetland areas. A small portion of a non -forested wetland in the NCDOT ROW may be temporarily impacted in order to accommodate the HDD rig that will install the pipe beneath
the wetland without creating additional disturbance. One stream crossing will be conducted via conventional isolation methods, While the remainder will be crossed by HDD.
Following preparation of the work area and installation of necessary E&SC measures in upland areas, the trench will be excavated along the "non -working" side of the easement.
Lengths of the new pipe Will be trucked to the site from temporary storage yards, strung along the easement and placed on skids (wooden pedestals). The pipe segments Will be heat -
welded together, inspected, and then lowered into the trench. Permanent trench breakers Will then be installed where necessary and the trench backfilled. Affected areas will then be
"cleaned up" by rough -grading and temporary seeding (if necessary), followed by final grading, permanent seeding and mulching to restore the easement as closely as possible to pre -
disturbance contours and conditions. All Work within the Wetland and at the stream crossing Will be conducted in accordance with the applicable permit conditions
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Typicals_Johnson_Pond_Rd.pdf 480.55KB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
Sa. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r WA
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Joey Lawler, PWS and Ashley Steele Benz, PWS
Agency/Consultant Company: S&ME
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Data Forms.pdf 291.51KB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
r Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity?

WA
EProposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
V Wetlands F% Streams -tributaries F7 Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type * (?) 2c. Type of W. * 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested* 2f. Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area*
2 Temp work space T ff-mland
Hardwood Forest
WC
No
Both
0.030
(acres)
Temp work space JL
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
WE
Yes
Both
0.090
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.120
29. Total Wetland Impact
0.120
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.000
❑ 3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* name * 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
S1 Utility crossing Temporary Excavation :1E
::Iff::]
Both 1;;;E�]
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
15
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
15
3j. Comments:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)T
Bieck all that apply.
IJ Neuse
rTar-Pamlico
r Catawba
r Randleman
r Goose Creek
r Jordan Lake
G Other
6b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
Permanent Utility corridor
P
S1
No
600
400
Temporary workspace
T
S1
No
300
200
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 300.00 200.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 600.00 400.00

Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 900.00 600.00
61. Comments:
Activity is exempt per Neuse River Buffer Rules Table of Uses
Supporting Documentation
Figures 4-13.pdf 3.17MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The proposed easement was routed to avoid wetlands and streams and utilizing areas that have been previously developed (the NCDOT ROW) where
practicable. Impacts to significant streams and adjacent wetland areas will be avoided by use of HDD.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
At wetland areas, where the pipe will be installed by HDD, Dominion Energy does not plan to clear trees within their 10-foot Wide easement. At the
single stream crossing where the pipe will be installed by conventional means, Dominion Energy plans to only maintain a 10-foot Wide easement. At
this crossing, Dominion Energy Will only require an additional 5 feet of temporary workspace. A dam -and -pump system will be used to divert clean
water flow around the work area until the crossing is completed. Once Work affecting the stream is initiated, it will be carried to completion in an
expeditious manner to minimize the period of disturbance.
See cover letter for additional minimization details.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Wetland/stream impacts are temporary, and buffer impacts are exempt.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
❑ Level Spreader
❑ Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
❑ Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
❑ Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
V Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)

2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project is designed to service customers within limited existing DENC service area.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r No r N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r•' Yes r- No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r- No
If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this activity on the property.
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
See attached cover letter.
Consultation Documentation Upload
NCNHP_Report. pdf 1.14 MB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NMFS Online Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC SHPO Web Server
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No

8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Project will comply with local floodplain ordinance, as applicable.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Map
Miscellaneous U
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
NNP 12 Letter.pdf
235.65KB
Add Landowners.pdf
110.12KB
Restoration Plan.doc.pdf
121.29KB
Photos.pdf
749.23KB
Dominion Energy - Johnson Pond Road - HDD Contingency Plan.pdf
3.97MB
Signature
*
m By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Joey Lawler
Signature
j,vx-I L,Q 1I
Date
10/18/2019

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Date:
rro ect information
S&ME Project Name:
Type of Project:
Location:
DENC Johnson Pond Road Pipeline
Natural Gas Transmission Line Project
Wake County, NC
rroperty owner/Kep intormation
Owner Name: Dominion Energy Southeast Services, Corporate Environmental
Mailing Address: 220 Operations Way, MC C221
Cayce, SC 29033
Telephone No. 803.217.7112
Contact: Robert Schwartz, PE
wgent information
Business Name:
Street Address:
City, State, Zip:
Telephone No.
Contact:
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28273
704.523.4726
Joey Lawler, PWS
Authorization: I, {lA S. G'°F'^' '' e hereby authorize S&ME, Inc. to
submit information to and coordinate with the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USAGE) and/or the NC Division of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) and other
relevant Federal/State/Local agencies pursuant to obtaining necessary
environmental permits for the project referenced above. If applicable, this also
authorizes the USACE/NCDEO to access the proposed easement for the
purposes of conducting site assessment/confirming the accuracy of delineated
boundaries.
Signature: /l
S&ME, INC. / 9751 Southern Pine Blvd / p 704.523.4726 f 704.525.3953 / www.smeinc.com

Affected Landowners
Johnson Pond Road Pipeline
Dominion Energy North Carolina
Wake County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7335-19-075
Note: Dominion Energy North Carolina has acquired, or is in the process of acquiring temporary workspace or an
easement on these properties.
County
Deed Book
Page
PIN
Owner
Mailing Address
Harold R. Fowler and
300 Bentwillow Drive
Wake
9569
1190
678661990
Patricia S. Fowler
Fuquay Varina, NC 27526-8621
Canio M. Codella III and
3005 Brozak Drive
Wake
16016
2578
678671493
Kathryn Shuler Codella
Fuquay Varina, NC 27526-8467
Patricia Lasater Duma and
7835 Valleyfield Drive
Wake
14-E
1153
679603162
Debra L. Flentje
Springfield, VA 22153-4117
Charles Leonard Parker
PO Box 123
Wake
2903
297
678588069
and James Judd Parker
Fuquay Varina, NC 27526-0123
D. Watson Adcock and
8020 Kensington Drive
Wake
2997
656
678697535
Willa A. Adcock
Fuquay Varina, NC 27526-9471

44
f ,
4 r hsy
co
d4 � _
41
%,I, FV 11)
' ` *•
Es
AL pa 00
t b Qy j s p f rLn
ti r' 1 s>rS x O
t
Im
#_..f HAS �s`—` ! Z
F
uj
X Z_
JJ
SEE w J
FG 4 SEE FIG.
—
G
(� w Q
n3 r V
SEE FIG. ( �
yr_
} ♦ `raw— x N off
■
ro I � �� -- r'� I � „"`3 yr•°r} � V` Z
O z
Qu v
_ c9
o
T
o w,
V
Z `• `Nf _ _
SCALE:
iv
d} — —
1 1,000
DATE
10/18/19
— 71 PROJECT NUMBER:
z REFERENCE:` .-_.._.-
V THE ABOVE 1970 WAKE COUNTY SOIL SURVEY MAPS 84, 85,91, &92 WERE OBTAINED FROM THE 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 _ ` -e 1y,• f` 7335-19-075
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS). PROJECT ALIGN MENT INFORMATION WAS c'� ' z_'y
- LEGEND FIGURE NO.
OBTAINED FROM THE OWNER. PLEASE NOTE THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.f -,
IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT _ — s.ese
ITS ACCURACY S&ME, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) E-0 �PROPOSEDPIPELINE
imam
o ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE ABOVE DATA.
Q JURISDICTIONAL IMPACTS EXHIBITS

0
N
0
0
0
0
E
4m
W
y � �
W
W
vi
'Ar [
Q
a
z
>
a
a
Q
�
� Z
Ln
'ailQ
0
-r11111L
I
V
wimam "a Lla
0
o
V
V
K
a
V
a
BASIL DO N CT
1low 9w4rialb,i
L--7-
moll ,�•_ .
JOHNSON POND RD JOHNSON POND RD ,
�= n
j r
s 4,,..
REFERENCE: FEATURES DELINEATED BY S&ME PERSONNEL IN SEPTEMBERAND OCTOBER
2019.THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS
of
DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOTBASEDON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION,
UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
III
Q
z
O
z
°
ZJ
~
xLuQ
x
w
W
z
z
J
Cf
U
�
au
a
=
00
Q
0
o
z
Lu
LL
z
O
Q
°�
o
}
O
W
F-
z
O
lJ
w
in
U
d
Y
A
�
a�
N
O
LEGEND
Q PROJECT LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE (LOD)
PROPOSED PIPELINE
i PERMANENT MAINTAINED ROW SCALE:
1 TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS 1 " = 100 '
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS 10/18/19
EXISTING CULVERT PROJECT NUMBER
�.• ® WETLANDS 733S-19-07S
0 100 200 300 •• • — STREAM CENTERLINE FIGURE NO.
STREAM BANKS
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) •�� DELINEATED FEATURES OUTSIDE LOD 8

jlu 0R f 3
-1-
�,��� _
Zt
4E+ _ '�'. 4p 1. a
f z
xLuQ
x z
0
W '-'-' J
N WCf L� Z d L W
c W U v
o !` ao a
a =
T LLI
un off
Q O
-- l7 z
JOHNSON POND RD U. o
Q
E _ ,� JOHNSON POND RD W Z �off
al ------- z O
E-+ p Lu
E p �1
a
z
do _
�r
U I
s
Lu
i l
p .3► �
' l
10
LEGEND
uLf Z Q PROJECT LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE (LOD)
} ! m PROPOSED PIPELINE
PERMANENT MAINTAINED ROW SCALE:
1f 1 TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS 1 " = 100 '
+� TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS DATE:
0 10/18/19
EXISTING CULVERT
G PROJECT NUMBER
�' ® WETLANDS 733S-19-07S
V
REFERENCE: FEATURES DELINEATED BY S&M E PERSO NNEL IN SEPTEMBER AND OCTOBER 0 100 200 300 STREAM CENTERLINE FIGURE NO.
2019.THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS
DISPLAYEDAREAPPROXIMATED.THEYARENOTBASEDONCIVILSURVEYINFORMATION, STREAM BANKS
o UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. 9
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) DELINEATED FEATURES OUTSIDE LOD

Restoration Plan
Johnson Pond Road Pipeline Project
Wake County, North Carolina
The proposed project has been designed to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts where practicable. As
part of mitigation for unavoidable impacts, the following plan shall be implemented to restore temporarily -
affected wetlands and the stream. This plan entails restoration of temporarily -disturbed areas to their
original contours and conditions to the degree practicable upon project completion. Unless otherwise
authorized by the appropriate permits, no fills or spoils of any kind will be permanently placed within
wetlands or along the stream banks. Further, disturbed wetland areas and streambanks will be permanently
stabilized using coir matting (with no plastic or nylon) and native vegetative cover.
Proposed restoration activities will include the removal of placed fill material and restoration of original pre -
disturbance contours. Excavated material shall be returned to the trench to the extent possible, and
remaining excess material relocated and retained on an upland site. Excavated topsoil will be stockpiled
separately, kept viable, and then replaced uniformly over the area of excavation from which it was removed.
The native seed mix identified in Table 1 below will be utilized within temporarily -disturbed streambanks and
riparian buffer areas.
Table 1: Riparian Seed Mix
Agrostis perennans
Autumn bentgrass
15
Andropogon gerardii
Big bluestem
10
Coreopsis lanceolata
Lanceleaf coreopsis
10
Elymus virginicus
Virginia wildrye
20
Juncus effusus
Soft rush
5
Panicum virgatum
Switchgrass
15
Rudbeckia hirta
Blackeyed susan
10
Schizachyrium scoparium
Little bluestem
5
Sorghastrum nutans
Indian grass
5
Tripsacum dactyloides
Eastern gamagrass
5
Riparian Seed Mix is to be applied to all disturbed streambanks and buffer areas. The recommended
application rate: 20 lbs. per acre.

The native seed mix identified in Table 2 below will be utilized within the temporarily -disturbed wetland
areas.
Table 2: Wetland Seed Mix
Bidens aristosa
Showy tickseed
7
Carex vulpinoidea
Fox sedge
12
Dichanthelium clandestinum
Deertongue
8
Elymus virginicus
Virginia wildrye
20
Juncus effusus
Soft rush
4
Panicum dichotomiflorum
Smooth panicgrass
14
Panicum rigidulum
Redtop panicgrass
8
Panicum virgatum
Switchgrass
23
Polygonum pensylvanicum
Pennsylvania smartweed
2
Sparganium americanum
Eastern bur reed
2
Wetland Seed Mix is to be applied to the disturbed wetland areas. The recommended application rate: 20 lbs.
per acre. To provide quicker cover, the mixes specified in Tables 1 and 2 should also be augmented with the
appropriate cover/companion species, as identified in Table 3.
Table 3: Cover/Companion Crops
Seca(e cerea(e
Cereal or
Early Spring or
30 Ibs/acre
Grows 3-4' tall, but not a strong a
Winter rye
Fall
com etitor.
Lo(ium perenne
Perennial rye
Early Fall or
20-50%
Shorter rye; lasts about 2 years,
Spring
then dies out.
Uroc(oo ramose
Brown Top
Spring, Summer
20-50%
Good germination; dies off with
Millet
frost; does not tolerate mowing.
Substitutions to the riparian and wetland mixes identified in this restoration plan may be made with prior
approval. Any substitutions shall consist of appropriate native species.
Additional information related to streambank restoration activities is included on the Typical Stream and
Wetland Crossing Details. Riparian and wetland seed mixes are available at:
Mellow Marsh Farm
1312 Woody Store
Road Siler City, N.C. 27344
919.742.1200
www.mellowmarshfarm.com

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
DENC Johnson Pond Road Pipeline
Wake County, NC
S&ME Project No. 7335-19-075
PHOTOGRAPH1
VIEWING DIRECTION: North
DESCRIPTION/COMMENT: View of
S1. Impacts avoided by use of HDD.
PHOTOGRAPH
VIEWING DIRECTION: West
DESCRIPTION/COMMENT: View of
WA (Bottomland Hardwood Forest).
Minor temporary impacts required
to establish workspace for HDD rig
next to road.

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
DENC Johnson Pond Road Pipeline
Wake County, NC
S&ME Project No. 7335-19-075
PHOTOGRAPH
11
VIEWING DIRECTION:N/A
DESCRIPTION/COMMENT: View of
�-
typical soil pedon taken from WA.
4
n
Mr
•� :r
_ -
•SCR-"s . —

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
DENC Johnson Pond Road Pipeline
Wake County, NC
S&ME Project No. 7335-19-075
PHOTOGRAPH 5
VIEWING DIRECTION: West
DESCRIPTION/COMMENT: View of
WB (Bottomland Hardwood Swamp).
Impacts avoided by use of HDD.
4
K
PHOTOGRAPH 6
VIEWING DIRECTION:South
�..
DESCRIPTION/COMMENT: View of
WC (Bottomland Hardwood Swamp).
Impacts avoided by use of HDD.
f
y..
:1.
c
's�
r
�i

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
DENC Johnson Pond Road Pipeline
Wake County, NC
S&ME Project No. 7335-19-075
PHOTOGRAPH 7
VIEWING DIRECTION: NA'�
!�-^
V51
DESCRIPTION/COMMENT: View of
typical soil pedon taken from WC.-
f, I , X

■ ■■■ Roy Cooper. Governor
ME NC DEPARTMENT OF Susi Hamilton, Secretary
women NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
0 son Walter Clark, director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-10312
September 24, 2019
Amy Moore
S&ME, Inc
9751 Southern Pine Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28273
RE. Johnson Road Pipeline, 7335-19-075
Dear Amy Moore.
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water
Management Trust Fund easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented
near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butlerLncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
Q 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC 918.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Johnson Road Pipeline
Project No. 7335-19-075
September 24, 2019
NCNHDE-10312
Element Occurrences
Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name
Element Accuracy Federal
State Global State
Group
Observation Occurrence Status
tatus Rank Rank
a j
Date Rank
Freshwater
34956 Fusconaia masoni Atlantic Pigtoe
2004-07-07 E 3-Medium Proposed
Endangered G2 S3
Bivalve
Threatened
Freshwater
8924 Strophitus undulatus Creeper
2018-06-07 E 3-Medium ---
Threatened G5 S3
Bivalve
Natural
13302 Dry-Mesic ---
2013 C 3-Medium ---
--- G4G5 S4
Community
Oak --Hickory Forest
(Piedmont Subtype)
Natural
8840 Mesic Mixed Hardwood---
2013 B 2-High ---
--- G3G4 S4
Community
Forest (Piedmont
Subtype)
Natural
30513 Piedmont Bottomland ---
2009-03-07 A 2-High ---
--- G3G4 S2
Community
Forest (High Subtype)
Natural Areas
Documented Within Project Area
Re resentational Rating collective Rating
NEU/Middle Creek Aquatic Habitat R3 (High)
C3 (High)
Middle Creek Bluffs and Floodplain R2 (Very High)
C4 (Moderate)
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area
Managed Area N m Owner Owner Type
Triangle Greenways Council Preserve Triangle Greenways Council Private
Triangle Greenways Council Preserve Triangle Greenways Council Private
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s:Z/ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/helr). Data query generated on September 24, 2019; source: NCNHP, Q3 Jul 2019.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 5

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Johnson Road Pipeline
Project No. 7335-19-075
September 24, 2019
NCNHDE-10312
Element Occurrences
Documented
Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID 1[cientific
Name Common Name Element
Accuracy
Federal State
Global
State
Group
WOb7servation Occurrence
Status Status
Rank
Rank
i
M Rank
< It
i
Dragonfly or
32043
Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner
2004-Pre H?
5-Very
--- Significantly
G5
S2?
Damselfly
Low
Rare
Freshwater
18654
Alasmidonta undulata Triangle Floater
2016-11-04 C
3-Medium
--- Threatened
G4
S3
Bivalve
Freshwater
34956
Fusconaia masoni Atlantic Pigtoe
2004-07-07 E
3-Medium
Proposed Endangered
G2
S3
Bivalve
Threatened
Freshwater
2952
Lampsilis radiata Eastern Lampmussel
2018-06-07 E
3-Medium
--- Threatened
G5
S3
Bivalve
Freshwater
8924
Strophitus undulatus Creeper
2018-06-07 E
3-Medium
--- Threatened
G5
S3
Bivalve
Freshwater
16205
Villosa constricts Notched Rainbow
1992-05-18 E
3-Medium
--- Threatened
G3
S3
Bivalve
Natural
13302
Dry-Mesic ---
2013 C
3-Medium
--- ---
G4G5
S4
Community
Oak --Hickory Forest
(Piedmont Subtype)
Natural
37185
Floodplain Pool ---
2017-04-13 B
2-High
--- ---
G3
S2
Community
Natural
8840
Mesic Mixed Hardwood---
2013 B
2-High
--- ---
G3G4
S4
Community
Forest (Piedmont
Subtype)
Natural
30513
Piedmont Bottomland ---
2009-03-07 A
2-High
--- ---
G3G4
S2
Community
Forest (High Subtype)
Natural
37184
Piedmont/Mountain ---
2017-04-13 E
2-High
--- ---
G4G5
S4
Community
Semipermanent
Impoundment (Open
Water Subtype)
Natural
5094
Piedmont/Mountain ---
2013 E
3-Medium
--- ---
G4
S4
Community
Semipermanent
Impoundment (Shrub
Subtype)
Page 3 of 5

Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Group Observation
DjM
Vascular Plant 10838 Thermopsis mollis Appalachian Golden- 2002-09-19
banner
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Wepresentational Rating
NEU/Middle Creek Aquatic Habitat R3 (High)
Middle Creek Bluffs and Floodplain R2 (Very High)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name
Triangle Greenways Council Preserve Triangle Greenways Council
Triangle Greenways Council Preserve Triangle Greenways Council
Element Accuracy Federal
State
Global State
Occurrence Status
Status
Rank Rank
Rank
B 3-Medium ---
Special
G3G4 S2
Concern
Vulnerable
NEW Collective Rating
C3 (High)
C4 (Moderate)
Owner Type
Private
Private
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s:Z/ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/helr). Data query generated on September 24, 2019; source: NCNHP, Q3 Jul 2019.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 4 of 5

NCNHDE-10312: Johnson Road Pipeline
<. r"Pinmsl Farm
- � r 1 Dr
�a
400p Rd
a v I
y I
Y
I Erackcnr
L
i 6
D'
C I'C cc
r
a
Qte. !v1
.,;mJD-lyn�dm
S,
hluit field Dr
y.
BenAvinds Goff
3 Country Club
N
'lJhitted Rd
W+E
S
September 24, 2019
M
Project Boundary
F1
Buffered Project Boundary
E3
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
El
Managed Area (MAREA)
5
"uo n
Pryer alb
5�
tiv
F f�
Ge We r BI
Tr
y �a
C)on�Y(3r oo ,
a
K
Y
d
� Tech Rd
Rd
N
dn�
Banks Rd
. r
1:33,606
0 0.275 0.55 1.1 mi
0 0.45 0.9 1.8 km
Sources' Esri, HERE, Garmia, Intermap, increment P Corp_. GEBCC,, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esn China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Page 5 of 5

12-IN. COMPOST
FILTER SOCK
(SEE NOTE 2)
WETLAND
BOUNDARY
WETLAND
TIMBER MAT SECTION VIEW
12-IN. COMPOST TIMBER MAT WORK AREA III =
FILTER SOCK 4-FT. DIMENSIONS VARY
(SEE NOTE 2) 12-IN. COMPOST MIN. BASED ON EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS
FILTER SOCK
(SEE NOTE 2) TIMBER MATS 10-FT. MIN.
(TYP.)
n n E_ 0�f
WETLAND WETLAND
BOUNDARY
W W W W W W W W W W
y 41 IV WA
41
WETLAND
i
i
i
90_1:T KAlnl
I
1 Al
PLAN VIEW
TIMBER MATS
(TYP.)
CROSS-SECTION A -A
TIMBER MAT NOTES
1. TIMBER EQUIPMENT MATS SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET OUTSIDE OF
WETLAND BOUNDARIES.
2. COMPOST FILTER SOCK SHALL BE INSTALLED 4-FT. FROM THE EDGE OF THE TIMBER
MATS AND ADJACENT TO THE UNDISTURBED WETLANDS.
3. INSTALL TIMBER MATS IN WORK AREA AS NEEDED. POSITION A SERIES OF TIMBER
MATS AS NEEDED TO CREATE A SAFE, FLAT WORK AREA. MATS SHALL BE POSITIONED
TO BUTT UP AGAINST EACH OTHER.
4. TIMBER MATS SECTIONS ARE TYPICALLY ATTACHED.
5. USE ADDITIONAL TIMBER MAT LAYERS TO RAISE WORK AREA ABOVE GRADE WHERE
POOR SOIL CONDITIONS EXIST. ATTEMPT TO USE NO MORE THAN TWO (2) LAYERS IN
WETLANDS.
6. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO TIMBER MATS AS
SHOWN ON PLAN DRAWINGS.
7. DURING TIMBER MAT INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT THE
INTRODUCTION OF UPLAND SOILS OR OTHER MATERIALS INTO WETLANDS.
TIMBER MAT MAINTENANCE
1. INSPECT AT LEAST ONCE PER 7 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A RAIN
EVENT GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 1.0-IN. IN 24 HOURS. INSPECT MORE
FREQUENTLY DURING PERIODS OF HEAVY USE.
2. TIMBER MATS AND ALL OTHER MATERIALS SHALL BE COMPLETELY REMOVED DURING
FINAL CLEAN-UP. REMOVAL OF THIS STRUCTURE IS NOT CONTINGENT UPON
ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMANENT VEGETATION.
z
O
z
F- Q
X z
w J
w O
z �
J Q
w V
a
a =
Ln re,
O
W z
O z
F' o O
Z V
a Q
z �
O
Z
O
SCALE:
N.T.S.
DATE:
10/18/2019
PROJECT NUMBER
7335-19-075
FIGURE NO.
14

DEWATERING PUMP z
WITH SECONDARY 20-FT. MIN. (TYP.) Q
CONTAINMENT 0
a
O
nn LOD —
SCREEN INTAKE
Fx
TRENCH >�
LOD
TRENCH
DEWATERING HOSE
SILT FENCE OR 12-IN.
COMPOST FILTER SOCK
STREAM CROSSING - PUMP BY-PASS NOTES
1. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT OPERATE WITHIN THE
STREAM OR TRAVERSE STREAM UNTIL THE DAY OF PIPE
INSTALLATION.
2. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY COFFER DAMS WITHIN LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL DEWATERAREA BETWEEN DAMS AND
ENSURE TIGHT SEAL OF DAMS PRIOR TO TRENCHING.
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PASSING ALL WATER
WHICH IS TO BE FILTERED THROUGH A FILTER BAG PLACED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH APPROPRIATE E&SC MEASURES. INSTALL
12-INCH COMPOST FILTER SOCK ON THREE DOWNGRADIENT
SIDES OF FILTER BAG. DEWATERING PUMPS SHALL BE PLACED
WITHIN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT.
4. SCREEN PUMP INTAKES TO MINIMIZE ENTRAINMENT OF AQUATIC
LIFE. PLACE PUMP INTAKE IN SUMP HOLE/POOL UPSTREAM OF
UPSTREAM COFFER DAM. PLACE BYPASS HOSE OUTSIDE OF
STREAM BANKS WITH DISCHARGE DOWNSTREAM OF
DOWNSTREAM COFFER DAM BEFORE COMMENCING BYPASS.
TAKE MEASURES TO PREVENT STREAMBED SCOUR AT PUMP
DISCHARGE THROUGH THE USE OF AN ENERGY DIFFUSER. TAKE
REASONABLE MEASURES TO PREVENT INTAKE FROM SUCTIONING
THE STREAM SUBSTRATE.
COFFER DAM
(TYP.)
SCREEN INTAKE
(TYP.)
21 z DIFFUSER
= m
ol w
O
w
o I I I
LOD
PROPOSED PIPE
BY-PASS HOSE
BY-PASS PUMP WITH
SECONDARY
CONTAINMENT
LOD
TEMPORARY
WORKSPACE 5-FT.
-- ----- ------------ �__f ---
TB PERMANENT
EASEMENT 10-FT.
LOD LOD LOD
10-FT.
2 > 50-FT. RIPARIAN BUFFER (TYP.)
W
�O
V) u-
5. THE PUMP(S) SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO CONVEY NORMAL
STREAM FLOW. HAVE STANDBY PUMPS AND GENERATORS
CAPABLE OF HANDLING 100% OF ANTICIPATED FLOW ON -SITE IN
CASE OF PUMP FAILURE ORA RAIN EVENT. CONTINUOUSLY
MONITOR THE DAM AND PUMPS TO ENSURE PROPER OPERATION
THROUGHOUT THE STREAM CROSSING. ALL PUMPS SHALL BE
PLACED WITHIN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT.
6. THE STREAM CROSSING SHOULD BE MADE PERPENDICULAR TO
THE STREAM TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS SHOWN ON
PERMITTED PLANS. INSTALL SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT THE STREAM CROSSING. EXTEND
SILT FENCE 20-FT. MINIMUM ON BOTH SIDES OF EDGE OF
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
7. LIMIT THE REMOVAL OF VEGETATION TO THE CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT AREA. ONLY HAND CLEARING IS ALLOWED ON STREAM
BANKS AND WITHIN 10-FT. OF TOP OF BANK, EXCEPT WITHIN THE
TRENCHLINE OR FOR SAFETY PURPOSE.
8. THE STREAM CROSSING SHOULD BE CONDUCTED "IN THE DRY'
DURING LOW FLOW CONDITIONS. LOCAL WEATHER CONDITIONS
SHALL BE MONITORED IN ORDER TO AVOID ANTICIPATED
RAINFALL EVENTS DURING, OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING,
INSTALLATION OF THE PIPE.
9. THE STREAM CROSSING SHALL BE EXECUTED IN THE MINIMAL
AMOUNT OF TIME NECESSARY; BEGIN INSTREAM WORK IN THE
MORNING, INSTALLATION AND RESTORATION SHALL OCCUR
WITHIN A 24-HOUR PERIOD TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL.
IN NO INSTANCE SHOULD INSTALLATION AND RESTORATION
EXCEED 48 HOURS WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR.
10. CONTRACTOR SHALL ATTEMPT TO SEGREGATE STREAM BED
SUBSTRATE FROM SUBGRADE.
11. NO WASTES, SPOILS, SOLIDS OR FILLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN
STREAM OR RIPARIAN AREAS BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THOSE
DEPICTED ON THE DRAWINGS.
12. THE STREAM CROSSING SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL
CONTOURS TO FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL, ONCE
CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. AFTER SUBGRADE HAS BEEN
BACKFILLED APPLY STREAM SUBSTRATE, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT
PRACTICAL.
13. ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY IN
ORDER TO PROTECT THE AFFECTED STREAM AND PREVENT
VIOLATIONS OF WATER QUALITY STANDARDS.
14. ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR TO ASSIST IN DETERMINATION OF
WHETHER PUMP AROUND OR FLUME STREAM CROSSING METHOD
IS TO BE USED.
SCALE:
N.T.S.
DATE:
10/18/2019
PROJECT NUMBER
7335-19-075
FIGURE NO. 1
16

z
z
DEWATERING PUMP
WITH SECONDARY
20-FT. MIN. (TYP.)
m
= m
CONTAINMENT
O
O O
COFFER DAM
III
a
O
w
O
(TYP.)
LOD LOD
L D
TEMPORARY
WORKSPACE 5-FT.
—
— — —7.
— — — — — — —
— — — — — — —
SCREEN INTAKE
(TYP.)
—
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
� �
J
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
TRENCH
TB
TB�
PERMANENT
f
F(��
I
EASEMENT 10-FT.
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
TRENCH
DEWATERING HOSE
SILT FENCE OR 12-IN.
COMPOST FILTER SOCK
w�
�0
STREAM CROSSING - FLUME NOTES
1. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT OPERATE WITHIN THE
STREAM OR TRAVERSE THE STREAM UNTIL THE DAY OF PIPE
INSTALLATION.
2. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY COFFER DAMS WITHIN LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL DEWATERAREA BETWEEN DAMS AND ENSURE
TIGHT SEAL OF DAMS PRIOR TO TRENCHING. CONTRACTOR SHALL
BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PASSING ALL WATER WHICH IS TO BE
FILTERED THROUGH A FILTER BAG PLACED IN CONJUNCTION WITH
APPROPRIATE E&SC MEASURES. INSTALL 12-IN. COMPOST FILTER
SOCK ON THREE DOWNGRADIENT SIDES OF FILTER BAG.
DEWATERING PUMPS SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN SECONDARY
CONTAINMENT.
4. INSTALL FLUME PIPE AND PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 12-INCHES OF
COVER OR% DIAMETER OF PIPE FOR FLUMES GREATER THAN
36-INCH IN DIAMETER. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SIZE
FLUME PIPE TO ADEQUATELY ACCOMMODATE BANK FULL FLOWS.
ALIGN FLUME PIPE(S) TO PREVENT BANK EROSION AND STREAMBED
SCOUR.
10-FT. (TYP.)
5. THE STREAM CROSSING SHOULD BE MADE PERPENDICULAR TO THE
STREAM TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL. INSTALL SILT FENCE
PERPENDICULAR TO THE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT STREAM
CROSSING. EXTEND SILT FENCE 20-FT. MINIMUM ON BOTH SIDES
OF EDGE OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
6. LIMIT THE REMOVAL OF VEGETATION TO THE CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT AREA. ONLY HAND CLEARING IS ALLOWED ON STREAM
BANKS AND WITHIN 10-FT. OF TOP OF BANK, EXCEPT WITHIN THE
TRENCHLINE OR FOR SAFETY PURPOSE.
7. THE STREAM CROSSING SHOULD BE CONDUCTED "IN THE DRY'
DURING LOW FLOW CONDITIONS. LOCAL WEATHER CONDITIONS
SHALL BE MONITORED IN ORDER TO AVOID ANTICIPATED RAINFALL
EVENTS DURING, OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING, INSTALLATION OF
THE PIPE.
8. THE STREAM CROSSING SHALL BE EXECUTED IN THE MINIMAL
AMOUNT OF TIME NECESSARY; BEGIN INSTREAM WORK IN THE
MORNING, INSTALLATION AND RESTORATION SHALL OCCUR
WITHIN A 24-HOUR PERIOD TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL. IN
NO INSTANCE SHOULD INSTALLATION AND RESTORATION EXCEED
48 HOURS WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL
INSPECTOR.
i
u
W
z
ui
50-FT. RIPARIAN BUFFER (TYP.)
x
w
a
w
w
z_
1
J
w
a
z
Q
o
1:4
V
0
0
fsl
�
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL ATTEMPT TO SEGREGATE STREAM BED
0
SUBSTRATE FROM SUBGRADE.
10. DO NOT REMOVE FLUME PIPE DURING TRENCHING, PIPELAYING, OR
=
BACKFILLING ACTIVITIES, OR INITIAL STREAMBED RESTORATION
0
EFFORTS.
11. NO WASTES, SPOILS, SOLIDS OR FILLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN
STREAMS OR RIPARIAN AREAS BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THOSE
DEPICTED ON THE DRAWINGS.
12. THE STREAM CROSSING SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL
CONTOURS TO FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL, ONCE CONSTRUCTION
IS COMPLETED. AFTER SUBGRADE HAS BEEN BACKFILLED APPLY
STREAM SUBSTRATE, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL.
13. ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY IN
ORDER TO PROTECT THE AFFECTED STREAM AND PREVENT
VIOLATIONS OF WATER QUALITY STANDARDS.
SCALE:
14. ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR TO ASSIST IN DETERMINATION OF
N.T.S.
WHETHER PUMP AROUND OR FLUME STREAM CROSSING METHOD
IS TO BE USED.
DATE:
10/18/2019
PROJECT NUMBER
7335-19-075
FIGURE NO.
17

STREAM PLAN VIEW
RIPARIAN SEEDING AREA (TYP.)
(50-FT. + STREAM BANK)
T-17---71 -ITI—TIT— _ T
71r:7N
I-
STREAM CROSSING - POST -CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1. AFTER THE PIPELINE IS INSTALLED, RESTORE STREAMBED & BANK
SUBGRADE TO ORIGINAL CONTOURS TO FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL,.
AFTER SUBGRADE HAS BEEN BACKFILLED APPLY STREAM SUBSTRATE,
TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL.
2. UPON COMPLETION OF CONTOUR RESTORATION, DISTURBED STREAM
BANKS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH RIPARIAN SEED MIX (SEE RIPARIAN
SEED SPECIFICATIONS).
3. RIPARIAN SEED MIX SHALL EXTEND FROM 50-FT. LANDWARD OF THE
TOP OF BANK DOWNSLOPE TO THE TOE OF BANK.
4. INSTALL COIR MATTING ON STREAM BANKS. COIR MATTING SHALL BE
NORTH AMERICAN GREEN BIONET C70OBN OR ENGINEER APPROVED
EQUIVALENT.
5-FT. MIN. COVER DEPTH
COIR MATTING
STREAM BANKS = C70OBN TEMPORARY MATTING = SC150BN
(10-FT. + STREAM BANK) 40-FT. MIN.
.L - -'r IT IT I 7 I- Z IT r -r r -
FT
-1 r r—
_--7 -r
Li I
—III iTiBi� I I—
TRENCH BREAKER
(TYP.)
STREAM SECTION VIEW
ORDINARY HIGH
WATER MARK (OHWM)
5. COIR MATTING SHALL EXTEND FROM 10 FEET LANDWARD OF THE TOP
OF BANK TO DOWNSLOPE TOE OF BANK. DO NOT INSTALL COIR
MATTING IN STREAM BED.
6. INSTALL TEMPORARY MATTING ON SLOPES ADJACENT TO STREAM
BANKS. TEMPORARY MATTING SHALL BE NORTH AMERICAN GREEN
BIONET SC150BN OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
7. TEMPORARY MATTING ON SLOPES SHALL EXTEND FROM COIR
MATTING A MINIMUM OF 40-FT. LANDWARD.
8. FOLLOWING PIPELINE INSTALLATION, REINSTALL SILT FENCE OR
SCALE:
N.T.S.
COMPOST FILTER SOCKS PERPENDICULAR TO THE CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT AT STREAM CROSSINGS.
DATE:
9. PERMANENT MAINTAINED ACCESS CORRIDORS SHALL BE RESTRICTED
TO THE MINIMUM WIDTH PRACTICAL AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 10-FT.
10/18/2019
PROJECT NUMBER
IN WIDTH.
7335-19-075
STREAM CROSSING - POST -CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE
FIGURE NO.
1. INSPECT STREAM CROSSING E&SC MEASURES AT LEAST ONCE PER 7
CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A RAIN EVENT GREATER
THAN OR EQUAL TO 1.0-IN. IN 24 HOURS.
��

a
HB
HC
i if
30 MIL HDPE LINER
=1 o m
J
LL I LL U- 1
I Q ° I
0 I ui 0 I
I I
I I
I
---I-- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — --I---�
�— — —I— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 7 — —�
I I
I I
I
pp,1 30 MIL HDPE LINER 1
I1-/
co co
z I z
Q I Q
I U-
0 I2 0
1 0 10 0
I � I
Iawil0 MISTA
TOP OF BANK
"---30 MIL HDPE LINER
HB
HC I OHWM 17
STREAM FLOW
CROSS-SECTION A -A'
COFFER DAM NOTES
CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY COFFER DAMS WITHIN
EDGES OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT. CONSTRUCT
DAMS USING SANDBAGS COVERED WITH CLEAN 30
MIL HDPE LINER OR CLEAN STEEL PLATE DRIVEN
INTO THE STREAM BANKS AND STREAM BED. USE
SANDBAGS TO SHORE STEEL PLATE IF NEEDED.
2. THE HEIGHT OF THE COFFER (HC) DAM SHALL BE
CALCULATED USING BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING
METHODS.
A. HC = HB/4 + 1-FT. (HB = HEIGHT OF STREAM BANK
IN FEET) WITH A 2-FT. MINIMUM DAM HEIGHT
B. HC = BASE FLOW + 1-FT. (BASE FLOW TO BE
IDENTIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION)
THE GREATER OF THE TWO RESULTING HEIGHTS
SHALL BE USED FOR THE COFFER DAM.
ADDITIONAL HEIGHT MAY BE REQUIRED BASED ON
FLOW CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF
CONSTRUCTION.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE TIGHT SEAL OF
SANDBAG COFFER DAM.
4. SANDBAGS SHOULD BE PLACED ALONG THE EDGES
OF THE COFFER DAM TO KEEP WATER FROM
CUTTING AROUND THE COFFER DAM.
=m
E5
SCALE:
N.T.S.
DATE:
10/18/2019
PROJECT NUMBER
7335-19-075
FIGURE NO. 1
19

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: DENC Johnson Pond Road Pipeline City/County: Fuqauy Varina / Wake Sampling Date: 14-Oct-19
Applicant/Owner: DENC State: Sampling Point: WA
Investigator(s): J. Lawler Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope: 0.5% / 0.3 °
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 35.6448050 Long.: -78.7413970 Datum:
Soil Map unit Name: Chewacla - Fluyaquentic Dystrudepts NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes O No O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes * No O
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No O
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O No O Is the Sampled Area Yes O No O
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes O No O within a Wetland?
Remarks:
Taekn in wooded portion of WA on west side of Johnosn Pond Road.
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑d Drainage Patterns (B10)
0 Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC-neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes O No OO
Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes O No O
Depth (inches): 9
Yes O No O
Saturation Present?
Yes No O
Wetland Hydrology
Depth (inches): 6
Present?
includes capillary fringe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
WETS data - Apex NC Station
Remarks:
Based on NRCS method, prior three-month period has been normal.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
Sampling Point: WA
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Betula nigra
2. Carpinus caroliniana
3. Quercus michauxii
4. Ouercus laurifolia
5. Liguidambar styraciflua
6.
7.
8.
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
1. Quercus michauxii
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1. Arundinaria gigantea
2. Smilax rotundifolia
3. Lonicera japonica
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Absolute
-r -.-.
Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
40
0
28.6%
FACW
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
35
0
25.0%
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
20
❑
14.3%
FACW
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
25
❑
17.9%
FACW
20
❑
14.3%
FAC
Percent of dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0
❑
o.o°io
Total % Cover of: Multioly by:
140
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
5
�/❑
100.0%
FACW
FACW species 105 x 2 = 210
0
❑
0.0%
FAC species 58 x 3 = 174
0
❑
0.0%
FACU species 3 x 4 = 12
0
❑
0.0%
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
0
❑
0.0%
column Totals: 166 (A) 396 (B)
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.386
0
❑
0.0°ro
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0
❑
0.0%
0 Dominance Test is 50%
0
❑
o.o%
>
d❑ Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
5
= Total Cover
❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
0
❑
0.0%
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
0
❑
0.00%
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
0
❑
0.00%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
0
❑
0.00%
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
0 ❑ o.o%
0
❑
o.o%
Four Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0%
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
0
= Total Cover
regardless of height.
d❑
Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
15
71.40%
FACW
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (f m) tall.
3
❑
14.30%
FAC
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
3
❑
14.30%
FACU
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
0
❑
0.00%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
El0.0%
in height.
0
0
❑
o.o%
Five Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0°ro
❑
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
0
0.00%
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
0
❑
0.00%
diameter at breast height (DBH).
El
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
0
0.0%
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
0
❑
0.00%
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
0
❑
0.00%
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (f to 6 m) in height.
21
=Total Cover
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
0
❑
0.00%
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (f
0
❑
0.00%
m) in height.
0
❑
0.00%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
0
❑
0.00%
height.
0
❑
o.o%
Hydrophytic
0
❑
0.0%
Vegetation
Yes * No ❑
0
= Total Cover
Present?
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant
*Indicator suffm = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

soil Sampling Point: WA
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
Unchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvce 1 Locz Texture Remarks
0-9 10YR 4/4 95 7.5YR 5/6 5 Loam
9-12 10YR 5/2 95 7.5YR 5/6 5 Loam
1 Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (AS)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions(F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes * No ❑
Remarks:
Soil is hydric
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: DENC Johnson Pond Road Pipeline City/County: Fuqauy Varina / Wake Sampling Date: 14-Oct-19
Applicant/Owner: DENC State: Sampling Point: WA - UP
Investigator(s): J. Lawler Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope: 1.0% / 0.6 °
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 35.6449860 Long.: -78.7410550 Datum:
Soil Map unit Name: Chewacla - Fluyaquentic Dystrudepts NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes O No O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes * No O
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes O No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O No O Is the Sampled Area Yes O No O
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes O No O within a Wetland?
Remarks:
Taken in wooded upland area near WA.
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC-neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes O No OO
Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes O No O
Depth (inches): 0
Yes O No O
Saturation Present?
Yes O No O
Wetland Hydrology
Depth (inches): 0
Present?
includes capillary fringe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
WETS data = Apex Station
Remarks:
Based on NRCS method, prior three-month period has been normal.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
Sampling Point: WA - UP
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Pinus taeda
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
3. Quercus falcata
4. Carpinus caroliniana
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
1. Ilex opaca
2. Acer rubrum
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5-
1 . Lonicera japonica
2. Ligustrum sinense
3. Smilax rotundifolia
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Absolute
-r -.-.
Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
40
0
32.0%
FAC
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
40
�/❑
32.0%
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
25❑
20.0%
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
20
❑
16.0%
FAC
0
❑
0.0°io
Percent of dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 37.5% (A/B)
0
❑
o.00/o
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0
❑
o.00/o
Total % Cover of: Multioly by:
125
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
10
0
50.0%
FACU
10
0
50.0%
FAC
FAC species 75 x 3 = 225
0
❑
0.00/0
FACU species 82 x 4 = 328
0
❑
0.00/0
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
0
❑
0.00/0
column Totals: 157 (A) 553 (B)
0
❑
0.00/0
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.522
0
❑
0.0%
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Dominance Test is > 50%
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
20
= Total Cover
❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
0
❑
0.0%
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
0
❑
0.00/0
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
0
❑
0.00/0
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
0
❑
0.00/0
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
0 ❑ o.o%
0
❑
o.o%
Four Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0%
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
0
= Total Cover
regardless of height.
d❑
Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
5
50.0%
FACU
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (f m) tall.
2
0
20.0%
FACU
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
3
0
30.0%
FAC
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
0
❑
0.0%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
El0.0%
in height.
0
0
❑
o.o%
Five Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0%
❑
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
0
0.00/0
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
0
❑
0.00/0
diameter at breast height (DBH).
El
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
0
0.0%
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
0
❑
0.00/0
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
0
❑
0.00/0
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (f to 6 m) in height.
10
=Total Cover
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
2
❑
100.0%
FAC
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (f
0
❑
0.00/0
m) in height.
0
❑
0.00/0
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
0
❑
0.00/0
height.
0
❑
o.o%
Hydrophytic
0
❑
0.0%
Vegetation
Yes ❑ No
2
= Total Cover
Present?
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is not dominant
*Indicator suffm = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

soil
Sampling Point: WA - UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
Unchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvce 1 Locz Texture Remarks
0-12 10YR 4/4 95 10YR 5/6 5 Sandy Loam
1 Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (AS)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions(F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No
Remarks:
Soil is not hydric
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: DENC Johnson Pond Road Pipeline City/County: Fuqauy Varina / Wake Sampling Date: 14-Oct-19
Applicant/Owner: DENC State: Sampling Point: WC
Investigator(s): J. Lawler Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope: 1.0% / 0.6 °
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 35.6411930 Long.: -78.7430760 Datum:
Soil Map unit Name: Chewacla - Fluyaquentic Dystrudepts NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes O No O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes * No O
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No O
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O No O Is the Sampled Area Yes O No O
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes O No O within a Wetland?
Remarks:
Taken in wooded portion of WC west of Johnson Pond Road.
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑d Drainage Patterns (B10)
0 Saturation (A3)
❑d Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑d Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC-neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes O No OO
Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes O No O
Depth (inches): 0
Yes O No O
Saturation Present?
Yes O No O
Wetland Hydrology
Depth (inches): 12
Present?
includes capillary fringe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
WETS data = Apex Station
Remarks:
Based on NRCS method, prior three-month period has been normal.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
Sampling Point: WC;
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Liguidambar styraciflua
3. Nyssa sylvatica
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1. Carex lurida
2. Persicaria pensvlvanica
3. Saururus cernuus
4. Smilax rotundifolia
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Toxicodendron radicans
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Absolute
-r -.-.
Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
60
0
57.1%
FAC
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
25
0
23.8%
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
20
❑
19.0%
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Percent of dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0
❑
o.o°io
Total % Cover of: Multioly by:
105
= Total Cover
OBL species 65 x 1 = 65
0
El
0.0%
FACW species 50 x 2 = 100
0
❑
0.0%
FAC species 112 x 3 = 336
0
❑
0.0%
FACU species 0 x 4= 0
0
❑
0.0%
0PL species 0 x 5= 0
0
❑
0.0%
column Totals: 227 (A) 501 (B)
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.207
0
❑
0.0°ro
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0
❑
0.0%
0 Dominance Test is > 50%
0
❑
o.o%
d❑ Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
0
= Total Cover
❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
0
❑
0.0%
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
0
❑
0.00%
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
0
❑
0.00%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
0
❑
0.00%
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
0 ❑ o.o%
0
❑
o.o%
Four Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0%
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
0
= Total Cover
regardless of height.
d❑
Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
40
33.3%
OBL
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (f m) tall.
50
0
41.7%
FACW
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
25
0
20.80%
OBL
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
5
❑
4.20%
FAC
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
El
in height.
0
0.0%
0
❑
o.o%
Five Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0°ro
❑
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
0
0.00%
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
0
❑
0.00%
diameter at breast height (DBH).
El
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
0
0.0%
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
0
❑
0.00%
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
0
❑
0.00%
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (f to 6 m) in height.
120
=Total Cover
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
2
❑
100.00%
FAC
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (f
0
❑
0.00%
m) in height.
0
❑
0.00%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
0
❑
0.00%
height.
0
❑
o.o%
Hydrophytic
0
❑
0.0%
Vegetation
Yes * No ❑
2
= Total Cover
Present?
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
*Indicator suffm = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

soil
Sampling Point: WC
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvce 1 Locz Texture Remarks
0-12 10YR 5/2 65 10YR 2/1 10 C M Loam See additonal mottling
below
10YR 4/6 25 C M Loam
1 Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (AS)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions(F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes * No ❑
Remarks:
Soil is hydric.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: DENC Johnson Pond Road Pipeline City/County: Fuqauy Varina / Wake Sampling Date: 14-Oct-19
Applicant/Owner: DENC State: Sampling Point: WC - UP
Investigator(s): J. Lawler Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Mound Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% / 0.0 °
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 35.6411930 Long.: -78.7430760 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla - Fluyaquentic Dystrudepts NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes O No O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes * No O
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No O
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O No O Is the Sampled Area Yes O No O
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes O No O within a Wetland?
Remarks:
Taken in upland area north of WC
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC-neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes O No OO
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes O No O
Depth (inches):
Yes O No O
Saturation Present?
Yes O No O
Wetland Hydrology
Depth (inches):
Present?
includes capillary fringe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
WETS Data = Apex Station
Remarks:
Based on NRCS method, prior three-month period has been normal.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
Sampling Point: WC - UP
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Liguidambar styraciflua
2. Ulmus americana
3. Pinus taeda
4. Carpinus caroliniana
5. Ilex opaca
6. Liriodendron tulipifera
7.
8.
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
1. Carpinus caroliniana
2. Ilex opaca
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Toxicodendron radicans
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Absolute
-r -.-.
Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
50
0
32.3%
FAC
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
40
�/❑
25.8%
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
25
El
16.1%
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
15
❑
9.7%
FAC
15
❑
9.7%
FACU
Percent of dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
10
❑
6.5%
FACU
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0
❑
o.o°io
Total % Cover of: Multioly by:
155
= Total Cover
oBL species 0 x 1 = 0
10
0
50.0%
FAC
FACW species 40 x 2 = 80
10
0
50.0%
FACU
FAC species 104 x 3 = 312
0
❑
0.0%
FACU species 35 x 4 = 140
0
❑
0.0%
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
0
❑
0.0%
column Totals: 179 (A) 532 (B)
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.972
0
❑
0.0°ro
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0
❑
0.0%
0 Dominance Test is > 50%
0
❑
o.o%
d❑ Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
20
= Total Cover
❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
0
❑
0.0%
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
0
❑
0.00%
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
0
❑
0.00%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
0
❑
0.00%
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
0 ❑ o.o%
0
❑
o.o%
Four Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0%
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
0
= Total Cover
regardless of height.
El
Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
2
100.0%
FAC
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (f m) tall.
0
❑
0.00%
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
0
❑
0.00%
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
0
❑
0.00%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
El
in height.
0
0.0%
0
❑
o.o%
Five Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0°ro
❑
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
0
0.00%
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
0
❑
0.00%
diameter at breast height (DBH).
El
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
0
0.0%
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
0
❑
0.00%
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
0
❑
0.00%
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (f to 6 m) in height.
2
= Total Cover
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
2
❑
100.00%
FAC
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (f
0
❑
0.00%
m) in height.
0
❑
0.00%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
0
❑
0.00%
height.
0
❑
o.o%
Hydrophytic
0
❑
0.0%
Vegetation
Yes * No ❑
2
= Total Cover
Present?
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
*Indicator suffm = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

soil Sampling Point: _WC - UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
Unchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvce 1 Locz Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 4/3 100 Sandy Loam
2-12 10YR 5/4 100 Loam
1 Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (AS)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions(F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No
Remarks:
Soil is not hydric.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0