20191433 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20191018

DWR
U1*1on Qf wxter Reyvurccs
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance into the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20191433
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Mr. On -Time Construction
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Mark P. Vosberg, PWS
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
10/18/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Little River
Basin
Meuse
Water Classification
W-SV, NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.81416667
Longitude:
78.32027778
Version# *
1
Reviewing Office*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
A. Processing Information -
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
rJ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r- Regional General Permit (RGP)
r- Standard (IP)

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
P 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
14 - Linear transportation
le. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r' Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
C Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner F Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Ralph Rojas
2b. Deed book and page no.:
15803, 215
2c. Responsible party:
Ralph Rojas
2d.Address
Street Address
1120 Edgernont Road
Address Line 2
city
Wendell
Postal / Zip Code
27591
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Mark P. Vosberg, PWS
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
C Yes f• No
C Yes r No

4b. Business Name:
Ecotek
4c.Address
Street Address
333 E. Park Street
Address Line 2
City
Cary
Fbstal / Zip Cade
27511
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
AgentAuth.pdf
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(ff appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/town:
Zebulon
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
2705-1115-5915
2c. Project Address
Street Address
439 Barbee Street
Address Line 2
City
Zebulon
Postal / Zip Code
27597
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Little River
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
W-SV, NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
03020201
4. Project Description and History
State / Province / P gion
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
2b. Property size:
11.88
State / Province / Fegon
NC
Country
Wake
232.47KB
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The proposed 60' long by 6' wide boardwalk will be constructed to span a 30' wide section of Jurisdictional wetland within a utility right-of-way and adjacent to Barbee Street; and a
driveway for accessing a proposed 80' x 190' gravel parking will be constructed in the southeast portion of the site. A cultural resources survey by the NC State Historic Preservation
Office and state -listed species survey by the US Fish & Wildlife Service has been requested to ensure no significant natural or cultural resources are located on or near the proposed
project.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r- Yes F No r- Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
USGS.pdf 421.19KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Soils.pdf 589.3KB

4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.96
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
None
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the proposed project is to: a) build an access driveway and gravel parking lot for the storage of construction vehicles; and b) build a pedestrian and/or bicycling side
walk including the boardwalk described in more detail below that will serve as a connector to and from properties along Barbee Street.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
A proposed 60' long by 6' wide boardwalk will be constructed to span a 30' wide section of jurisdictional Water's within a utility right-of-way adjacent to Barbee Street and a driveway for
accessing a proposed 80' x 190' gravel parking will be constructed in the southeast portion of the site for the storage of construction vehicles.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
P-1.pdf 178.52KB
P-2.pdf 356.08KB
P-3.pdf 117.25KB
P-4.pdf 70.94KB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Mark P. Vosberg, PWS #2625
Agency/Consultant Company: Ecotek
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
R Wetlands r Streams -tributaries r Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
!a. Site #* (?) 2a1 Reason(?) 2b. Impact type * (?) 2c. Type of W. * 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested * 2f. Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area*
Boardwalk T Seep L
Ib Corps 0.001
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.001 0.000
29. Total Wetland Impact
0.001
2h. Comments:
Temporary impacts associated with 6, 8" diameter borings to construct a 30' wide section of Jurisdictional wetland.

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
A 60' long by 6' wide boardwalk was designed to span a 30' wide section of jurisdictional wetland within a utility right-of-way adjacent to Barbee Street.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Temporary impacts associated with 6, 8" diameter borings to construct a 30' wide section of boardwalk over a Jurisdictional wetland area.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r^ Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r' Yes r No
If no, explain why:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r' No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 21-1.1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?
r Yes r No

5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
59. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
f Yes r No
f Unknown
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
There was no evidence of state -listed endangered or threatened species habitat observed on the property during our preliminary wetland and stream
buffer determination; and a request for a state -listed species survey has been sent to the US Fish & Wildlife Services as described by the enclosed.
Consultation Documentation Upload
FWS.pdf 132.72KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
See item G5j above.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
No evidence of a historic structure or structures were observed on the property during our preliminary wetland and stream buffer determination; and a
request for a cultural resources survey has been sent to the NC State Historic Preservation Office as described by the enclosed.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
SHPO.pdf 133.36KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
City of Raleigh and Wake County iMAPS, https://maps.raleighnc.gov/iMAPS/?pin=2705115915
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Report.pdf 5.67MB
Signature
*
fJ By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.

Full Name:
Mark Paul Vosberg
Signature
W CvAoelyl
Date
10/18/2019

ECO
33 3 Park Street, Carc N C 27 5 11 L'SA
February 28, 2019
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Mr. Tames Lastinger, Project Manager
3331 Heritage Trace Dr., Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Dear James,
Please consider this correspondence an official notice authorizing Ecotek, with offices at 333 E.
Park Street in. Cary, North Carolina as our agent for the purpose of acquiring permits at the
project site described below, as required by Section 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act:
Owner Name: Mr. On Time Construction
Address: 1120 Edgemont Rd., Zebulon, NC 27591
Phone: [phone]
Project Site: W. Barbee Street Site
Location: Equidistant between the intersection of W. Barbee Street and Moss Road
and the intersection of W. Barbee Street and S. Wakefield Street in
Zebulon, North Carolina
Sincerely,
j�
1<7 f,
Ow�er Signa re
Owner Name
Cc: File
markul caliecotek.com (9 1 9) 3 8 8- 1 6 2 4

P�rk� M
>� 1 21, - -
- T
[ r ,
WT
❑sp , [t - -
3P0��t'
r r
Yq
��� ' ■ V 4 4jQ �� r
Ace1■ f ' L!
M��11r J J ■
Source: USGS Zebulon Quadrangle, 2013
Location: 439 W. Barbee Street, Zebulon, NC
Scale: F, = +1000,
Project Name +11.88-Acre Barbee Street Site
TEK Project No. 19-02
Figure No. 1 of 3
3 N. Main Street, Suite E
Wendell, NC 27591 USA Date Feb. 17, 2019
mark@callecotelc com

D u B
DuB
l• i' 1
LON
�J HOS AL, f
V;lr f A B
DuB
ubject Propertynj4
-
4 ti.
DuBfj wa? 4'' } `-'
D u B Ap.
A C2 f ``
UB ApB2 AgB2 f `L
ApB2e r s G B2
,n ApC2 .P . ' ApB?
�r aA 1 DuB
rf. � A P S? �
Source: Wake County Soil Survey, 1970 Legend
Location: 439 W. Barbee St., Zebulon, NC AgB2 — Appling gravelly sandy loam, 2 — 6% slopes
Scale: 1" = +660' AgC2 — Appling gravelly sandy loam, 6 — 10% slopes
ApB2 — Appling sandy loam, 2-6% slopes
Cn— Colfax sandy loam, hydric
Wy — Worsham sandy loam, hydric
Project Name +11.88-Acre Barbee Street Site
)TEK Project No. 19-02
Figure No. 2 of 3
3 E. Main Street, Suite E
Wendell, NC 27591 USA Date Feb. 17, 2019
mark@callecotek. coin

LOCATION MAP
PERMIT DRAWINGS FOR SIDEWALK PROPOSED BY
MR,, ON -TIME CONSTRUCTION
ZEBULON
15TEI
NOT TO SCALE
ENVIRONMENTAL NOTES:
1. AN ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY OF THE SITE WAS PERFORMED BY MARK P. VOSBERQ
PROFESSIONAL WETLAND SCIENTIST (12625).
2 THE SITE INCLUDES VEGETATION THAT IS PART OF THE ORIGINAL LANDSCAPINQ INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO LARGE TREES, UNDER- STORY TREES AND SHRUBS
J. THE SITE ALSO INCLUDES STANDS OF VOLUNTEER/NATIVE CANOPY TREES THAT ARE GREATER
THAN 6-INCHES IN DBH.
4. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO ENSURE THE PRESERVATION OF EXISTING LANDSCAPING
VEGETA710N.
5. THERE ARE JIMSDIC71ONAL WATERS OF THE U.S LOCATED ON THE SITS MINIMAL TO NO
IMPACTS ANTICIPATED FOR PRIVATE SIDEWALK CROSSING
fhb dwwwt b copyoted by CSO W&M4 with ag righb marsed the use of thb downwi or any
mint be performed or of it vNiout outhori W by the En Capiee of drib documentt mtod ust cane from the �gial dooment
eantabbg the orighd seal and elgnahn of the Eng w, mlow wRbn permbebn b ghen by the Enginer.
439 BARBEE STREET
ZEBUL ON, NORTH CAROLINA 27597
LEGEND
- - — EXISIING BOUNDARY
CENTERLINE OF RIGHT OF WAY
PROP. PRIVATE RIGHT OF WAY
— PROP. LOT LINE
PROP. LOT NUMBER
EX. CONTOUR & ELEVATION
PROP. CONTOUR & ELEVATION
EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPE
PROP. STORM DRAIN PIPE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
0
PROP. BUILDING FOOTPRINT
— — — EX. STREAM TOP OF BANK
® RIPARIAN BUFFER (NEUSE BASIN)
EX. WETLAND AREA
WETLAND IMPACT AREA
INDEX TO DRA WINGS
SHEET No.
DESCRIPTION
DRAWING No.
1
OF
4
COVER SHEET
P1
2
OF
4
GENERAL LAYOUT
P2
3
OF
4
PLAN VIEW AT WETLAND CROSSING
P3
4
OF
4
PROFILE VIEW AT WETLAND CROSSING
P4
t7!
CwSD
ENGINEERING
LICENSE / C-2710
P.O. BOX 1250
WENDELL, NC 27591
[phone]
a
Q
RQ
z C, rn U
ALz� o
I C5 z
�LLJ
Ncn z
0
~ U
tail U
w
Y
T-'K
The Natural Selection„
DA TE.• 10/1112019
HORZ. SCALE: 1" = 80'
VERT. SCALE: N/A
DRA WN B Y.• JFO
CHECKED BY- MP V
Sheet
Sheet No.
1
• •
OF
4

L.A. 1 1%W1 L1111 WWW1TWr%1%1
LINDA BROWN
D.B. 16061 PG. 2270
Us dwwwt b copylghted by CSO MMM4 with ag rights resolved be use of thb downwi or any
part of it vNiout tprohbifod
must be performed orouthori W by the En Capiee of M d`ocumentmusf M cane ham the gr of dooment
`contabbg the orighd seal and slgnohre of the Eng w, wrens witten permbdm b ghen by the Engboor.
t7!
CSD
ENGINEERING
LICENSE / C-2710
P.O. BOX 1250
WENDELL, NC 27591
[phone]
o �
Q
i
z
REQ cr
O��rn U
U Z N I=-
R � Z O
I z
�N�� z
0
~ U
Lail U
W
Y
1 TEK
The Natural Selection
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L1
N
38'45'06"E
115.35'
JULIA FOSCUE
L2
N
38'59'57"E
100.96'
D.B. 8098 PG. 210
L3
N
39'06'41 "E
101.04'
DA TE.• 10/1112019
L4
N
38'45' 15"E
100.32'
HORZ. SCALE: 1 " = 80'
VERT. SCALE: N/A
/
%
L5
N
M09'45"E
99.15'
DRAWN B Y.• JFO
NC GRID NORTH NAD 83
L 6
N
38'58'25"E
95.70'
44, B.O.M. 2008 PG. 589
L7
N
38'47'39"E
129.55'
CHECKED BY.• MP
N = 751532.204 0 50 100 200
E = 2201784.013
L8
N
38'38' 10"E
104.87'
Feet
L9
N
38'51'25"E
106.26'
��
1" = 100'
Sheet
L10
N
39-01-24"E
1 109.34'
Sheet No. 2 of 4

PUBLIC RIGHT -OF_
W. BARBEE ST. 50' R/W (SR-2348)
. BOARDWALK CROSSING
FOOTING (TYP)
EX. EDGE OF PA
-------------
- -------------------- 7 ----------------
---- -------- 7
PROPOSED EASEMENT
E E
fhb dw ment b copylghted by CSO W&M4 with ag righb reserved the use of thb dxwnmi or my
part of it wffimt must be performed or t outhorimdfm thy the En Capim of drib docummtod ` t musf cane from the origholf dooment
contabbg the Mod seal and elgwWv of the EngYw, LWm wRbn permbdm b ghen by the Engboar.
WETLAND BOUNDARY
E E E E
CwSD
ENGINEERING
LICENSE / C-2710
P.O. BOX 1250
WENDELL, NC 27591
[phone]
o
Pz
Q
�Q cr
a��rn U
U Z N I=—
� � Z � O
���c Z
O
~ U
tail U
W
Y
TEK
The Natural Selection
DA TE: 10/1112019
HORZ. SCALE: 1 " = 10'
VERT. SCALE: N/A
DRA WN B Y.• JFO
CHECKED BY- MP V
Sheet P3
Sheet No. 3 OF 4

5
PROPOSED SIDEWALK GRADE
PROP. BOARDWALK CROSSING
4 X 4 WOOD POSTS
CONCRETE FOUNDATION (TIP)
OF WETLANDS
0+50
Thb dw ment b copylghted by CSO MMM4 with ag righb marsed the use of thb doaanen6 or any
mint be performed or of it vNiout outhori W by the En Capiee of drib documentt mted ust cane from the �gial dooment
contabbg the Mod seal and elgnabro of the Eng w, LWm wRbn permbdm b ghen by the Enginer.
. PARAPET (HAND RAIL)
215
EX. GROUND ® PROP. CENTERLINE
CSD
ENGINEERING
LICENSE / C-2710
P.O. BOX 1250
WENDELL, NC 27591
[phone]
TE'K
The Natural Selection„
DA TE: 10/1112019
HORZ. SCALE: 1" = 10'
VERT. SCALE: 1" = 1'
DRA WN B Y.• JFO
CHECKED BY- MP V
1+5o P4
Sheet
Sheet No. 4 OF 4

3 3 3 E. P a r k S t r e e t, C a r y, N C 2 7 5 1 1 U S A
October 18, 2019
State Historic Preservation Office
Ms. Renee Gledhill -Early
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Re: +11.88-Acre MOTC Site
439 Barbee Street, Zebulon, NC
Dear Renee,
Enclosed please find a location map, preliminary site plan and representative photographs for
your review and approval.
In summary, the project will require one wetland crossing with minimum to no impact for the
construction of 50' long by 6' wide pedestrian boardwalk. The site will also contain the paved
driveway and the 80' x 190' gravel parking lot necessary to store on and off road vehicles. Please
note, there is no evidence of an historic structure or structures on the property.
At your earliest convenience, please provide us with information regarding any historically
significant structures, artifacts, travel routes or encampments known to exist in the vicinity of the
proj ect.
Sincerely,
rz
Mark P. Vosberg, P.W.S.
Principal, Wetland Scientist
Encl.
Cc: Ralph Rojas, Mr. On -Time Construction
mark a) call ecotek.com (9 1 9) 3 8 8- 1 6 2 4

3 3 3 E. P a r k S t r e e t, C a r y, N C 2 7 5 1 1 U S A
October 18, 2019
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Mr. Peter Benjamin
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Re: +11.88-Acre MOTC Site
439 Barbee Street, Zebulon, NC
Dear Mr. Benjamin,
Enclosed please find a location map, preliminary site plan and representative photographs for
your review and approval.
In summary, the project will require one wetland crossing with minimum to no impact for the
construction of 50' long by 6' wide bicycle and pedestrian boardwalk. The site will also contain
the paved driveway and the 80' x 190' gravel parking lot necessary to store on and off road
vehicles. Please note, there is no evidence of state -listed endangered or threatened species habitat
on the property.
At your earliest convenience, please provide us with information regarding any federal or state -
listed species known to exist in the vicinity of this project.
Sincerely,
Mark P. Vosberg, P.W.S.
Principal, Wetland Scientist
Encl.
Cc: Ralph Rojas/Mr. On -Time Construction
[e-mail] (9 1 9) 3 8 8- 1 6 2 4

GTEK
3 N. Main Street,
Wendell, NC
2 7 5 9 1 USA
PRELIMINARY
WETLAND
&
STREAM
BUFFER DELINEATION
+11.88-Acre Barbee Street Site
Zebulon, North Carolina
Prepared For;
Steve Rojas, Vice President
Mr. On -Time Construction
1120 Edgemont Road
Zebulon, NC 27591
Prepared By:
Mark Vosberg, dba Ecotek
3 N. Main Street, Suite E
Wendell, NC 27591
mark(&_callecotek. c o m ( 9 1 9) 3 9 9- 1 6 2 4

February 19, 2019
Mr. On -Time Construction
Steve Rojas, Vice President
1120 Edgemont Road
Zebulon, NC 27591
Re: +11.88-Acre Barbee Street Site
Preliminary Wetland & Stream Buffer Delineation
Dear Steve,
At your request, we have completed a preliminary wetland and stream buffer delineation within
the +11.88-acre Barbee Street site in Zebulon, NC. Based on US Army Corp of Engineers
(USACE) technical criteria for wetland identification, and the NC Department of Environmental
Quality (NC DEQ) technical criteria for stream identification, there is one (1) jurisdictional
water's of the U.S./buffer and one (1) intermittent stream/buffer within the subject site. An aerial
photograph from the Wake County GIS, indicating jurisdictional water's data points, stream
classification point, photo point locations and the approximate jurisdictional water's/intermittent
stream boundaries is included as Figure 3.
LOCATION
The subject property is located equidistant between the intersection of W. Barbee Street and
Moss Road and the intersection of W. Barbee Street and S. Wakefield Street in Zebulon, North
Carolina, as shown by Figure 1. Geographically, the site can be found at approximately 350 48'
51" N, 78' 19' 13" W of the Third Principal Meridian and is positioned at approximately 345'
above sea level at its highest point.
TOPOGRAPHY
A map from the USGS 7.5-Minute Topographic Series, Zebulon Quadrangle (2013) was
reviewed to determine the presence of a dot -dash, or solid blue line stream within the site. Dot -
dash or solid blue line streams may be considered jurisdictional waters by the USACE, and
therefore subject to Section 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act. Figure 1 indicates neither a
dot -dash, nor a solid blue line stream is present within the subject property.
SOIL SURVEY
A map from the USDA Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Wake County, North Carolina
(1970) was reviewed to determine the potential for finding hydric soils within the subject
property. Areas containing hydric soils may be considered jurisdictional waters by the USACE,
and therefore subject to Section 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act. Figure 2 indicates the
following soils are present on -site:
[e-mail] (9 1 9) 3 8 8- 16 2 4

2
• AgB2 — Appling gravelly sandy loam, 2-6% slopes, eroded
• AgC2 — Appling gravelly sandy loam, 6-10% slopes, eroded
• ApB2 — Appling sandy loam, 2-6% slopes, eroded
• Cn Colfax sandy loam, hydric
• Wy — Worsham sandy loam, hyric
METHODOLOGY
The Coi s of Engineers Wetland Delineation Field Manual, January 1987, identifies mandatory
technical criteria for wetland identification. The three essential characteristics of a jurisdictional
wetland are hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology. Hydrophytic vegetation
consists of plants "typically adapted" to life in saturated soil conditions and separates plants into
five groups with varying degrees of tolerance to soil saturation or inundation. Hydric soils are
defined as "soils formed under conditions of saturation, flooding or ponding long enough during
the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part (Natural Resource
Conservation Service, 1995)." High organic content and redoximorphic features such as a gleyed
matrix are field indicators of hydric soils. Hydrologic indicators are usually the most difficult to
qualify in the field. Typically, soil saturation at 12" inches or less below the soil surface for
12.5% of the growing season leads to dominance by hydrophytic plant species and the reducing
soil conditions described above.
The NC DWQ — DWQ, Stream Technical Advisory Committee developed and approved the
Stream Identification Form; Version 4.11. The form was designed to produce a numerical rating
in order to determine the origin of regulated streams for riparian buffer applications; and contains
a geomorphologic, hydrologic and biologic section with categories for assigning a numerical
rating to 26 field indicators within columns entitled absent, weak, moderate or strong. The
ratings are designed to capture the expected range of variability for each field indicator in a
scientifically defendable manner. Streams receiving a 19-point rating or more are classified as
intermittent, whereas streams receiving a 30-point rating or more are classified as perennial.
Streams classified as intermittent or perennial are subject to riparian buffer rules.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The property is determined to contain approximately 2.15-acre of jurisdictional water's of the
U.S./buffer and 0.19-acre of jurisdictional stream/buffer based on the methodology outlined
above as established by the USACE and NC DEQ, respectively. We therefore recommend a
boundary survey of the jurisdictional water's areas be performed to determine exact size,
configuration and location. The survey will also be necessary in the event a Section 401 or 404
permit is required. Typically, avoidance of the jurisdictional water's of the U.S./buffer and
stream buffer, minimization of impact, and mitigation must be attempted before authorization of
a permit.
[e-mail] ( 9 1 9) 3 8 8- 1 6 2 4

3
Accordingly, we recommend that any site plan prepared for the property avoid jurisdiction
water's of the U.S./buffer and stream/buffer to the extent possible. However, if total impacts less
than 0.10-acre of jurisdictional waters and/or ISO linear feet of stream are unavoidable, these
disturbances may be allowed with mitigation by the USACE and NC DEQ under an existing
Nationwide permit and General Water Quality Certification, respectively.
We also recommend: a) a verification of this preliminary wetland and stream buffer delineation
be performed by a regulatory specialist with the USACE and NC DEQ; and b) the jurisdictional
waters boundaries survey be performed after verification to plat the property prior to any further
site planning.
We are prepared to assist you with coordinating the regulatory verification, the jurisdictional
water's boundary survey and the development of a site plan for avoidance and minimization of
impacts, along with a permit application on your behalf to the USACE and NC DEQ.
Please call or write with any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Mark P. Vosberg, P.W.S.
Principal, Wetland Scientist
Encl.
mark@callecotek. c o m ( 9 1 9) 3 8 8- 16 2 4

r
gs 6 x Po
t f f i
i
27,
WT
Osp
f sr.r.
i PraSub,��ect-pert�.�
f f3 ;
Str to .,'Q. -.
f
Ce
icupa
f
i ■
-- "`
Source: USGS Zebulon Quadrangle, 2013
Location: 439 W. Barbee Street, Zebulon, NC
Scale: 1" _ +1000,
Project Name +1 1.88-Acre Barbee Street Site
TEK project No. 19-02
Figure No. 1 of 3
3 N- Main Street, Suite E
Wendell. NC 27591 USA date Feb. 17, 2019
[e-mail]

u �
,yam ' D u B ` '.
TI-6 -1 Al L., f f �T
r f LL
r � �
f 7 G
f"DuBr 1; Ens
Ap
nav bj e
Du
Ap
AP i
r.
gm
_ AOB y� n A
DuB
Source. Wake County Soil Survey, 1970 Legend
Location: 439 W- Barbee St., Zebulon, NC AgB2 — Appling gravelly sandy loam, 2 — 6% slopes
Scale: 1" = +660' AgC2 --- Appling gravelly sandy loam, 6 — 10% slopes
ApB2 — Appling sandy loam, 2-6% slopes
Cn — Colfax sandy loam, hydric
Wy — Worsham sandy loam, hydric
Project Name ±11.8$-Acre Barbee Street Site
TEK Project No. 19-02
Figure No. 2 of 3
3 E. Main Street, Suite E
Wendell, NC 27-191 USA Date Feb. 17, 2019
rracrkC� cadlecnrek. cnm

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
ProjectlSite: ! n ,fi
Latitude: o !
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude: A ,r
r
Total Points:
Stream De (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intehniffent
if>_ 19 orperennial if? 30*
Ephemera ntermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: yy``��"�"�" '
�'R']ulLa (
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal - J)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
,a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex_ riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
1
2
3
6_ Depositional bars or benches
,,
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
CD
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal - )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
cip2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0=5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1
1.
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5
r = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
rr
r
^'
' 0 6

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
project/site: Barbee Street Site City/County: Zebulon/Wake
Applicant/Owner: Steve Rojas State: NC
Investigator(s): Mark Vosberg Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): Pond Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 35 48' 52.92" N Long: 78 19' 11.96" W Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Wy - Worsham sandy loam NWI classification: POW3
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E _V] No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil =, or Hydrology EZ:1 significantly disturbed? Y Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes = No =
Are Vegetation, Soil =, or Hydrology Q naturally problematic? N (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Sampling Date: 02/14/2019
_ Sampling Point: 1A
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No = Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No= within a Wetland? Yes = No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No =
Remarks:
Photo-1: water's of the U.S with wetland fringe
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauiredE check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Q Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Q High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
[] Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
Q Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
[] Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑✓ Water Marks (B1)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑✓ Sediment Deposits (82)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Q✓ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
I[]
El Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
L Water -Stained Leaves (89)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
,QAquatic Fauna (1313)
❑✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
I�
Yes � - r No Q Depth (inches): 2-4"
Water Table Present?
Yes = No Q Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?
Yes Q No = Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 1A
Absolute Dominant Indicator I Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: 2 (A)
2
3.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30'r
1. Liquidambar styracilfua 50 Yes FAC+
6
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
50 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30'r )
1. Eupatoriam capillifolium 30 FACU
2. Setaria glaca 20 FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: 66% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species 0
x 1 — 0
FACW species 0
x 2 = 0
FAC species 70
x 3 = 210
FACU species 30
x 4 =120
UPL species 0
x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 100
(A) 330 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A — 3-3
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
l Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation �I��I
1 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes LNo�
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Photo-1: excavated former wetland area to build pond resulting in wetland fringe during prolonged seasonal saturation
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 1 A
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
0-4 5Y 5/3 33 Clayey surface layer
4-12+ 2.5Y 5/2 66
Low chroma
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
Lj 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (SS) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Ej Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type. Clayey surface layer
Depth (inches): 0-4 Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks:
Restricted surface layer, low chroma and oxidized rhizopheres in subsoil (4-12")
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProiectlSite: Barbee Street Site City/county: Zebulon/Wake
Applicant/Owner: SteVe Rojas state: NC
Investigator(s): Mark Vosberg Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): None Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex slope (%a): 0-1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 35 48' 53.47" N Long: 78 19' 13.27" W Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Cn - Colfax sandy loam NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes F No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation rn Soil =, or Hydrology = significantly disturbed? Y Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes = No
Are Vegetation = Soil =, or Hydrology = naturally problematic? N (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Sampling Date: 02/14/2019
_ Sampling Point: 1 B
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No I -'J
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No= within a Wetland? Yes 0 No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No =
Remarks:
Photo-2: sampling area located just west of water's of the U.S
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sails (CB)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Stunted .,Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑--II Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
1_I Water -Stained Leaves (R9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes = No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes = No [= Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes❑ Non Depth
n
(inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:1 B
30 r
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Liquidambar styracilfua
20
Yes
FAG+
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Yes
FAC
3. Pinus taeda
10
Yes
FAC
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30'r }
1. Liquidambar styracilfua 20 Yes FAC+
2. Liriodendron tulipifera 20 Yes FAC
5
6
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: _ }
1.
2.
5
6
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30'r )
1. Allium canadense
7
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
`+u = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG. 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
0
x 1 =
0
FACW species
0
x 2 =
0
FAC species
90
x 3 =
270
FACU species
10
x 4 =
40
UPL species
0
x 5 =
0
Column Totals:
100
(A)
310 (B)
Prevalence Index =
B/A = 3.1
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Z 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Veaetation Strata:
3.6
ree-Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
pproximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
10 Yes FACU• cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
10 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation �
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Present? Yes r - r No=
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Photo-2: prior converted wetland hydrologically disconnected from groundwater discharge area located offsite
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: i Is
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvr)el LOC2 Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/3 66 Medium chroma, LOC
8-12+ 10YR 5/6 33
RM=Reduced Matrix. MS —Masked Sand
High chroma, LOC
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
0 Histosol (At)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Fpipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (SB) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (39) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (176)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
L] Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑I✓
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

� � I A �., �� � r`' � -� �^ � ry it 9 it � •r. • i!( � �.=, r � ,' �f';�: �� `i
f I T
n ` "
Al
41
03
! f -e � r �`.i. ` .�. � `,r' H.� e �ai �'d•'''f 1 �-..n "�. '� 5 V y ' � �,��`1.
Ajo
e
a .
A,