20191431 Ver 1_Beam Road AJD Determination Form 101619_20191017

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aimy.mil/Missions/Re ul�atoiyPermitProi4ram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Beam Road and Westoak Drive
City, State:
Charlotte, North Carolina
County: Mecklenburg
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): See PIN Table on page 44
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Paul Seefried
Mailing Address: Seefried Industrial Properties, Inc.
3333 Riverwood Parkway, Suite 200, Atlanta GA.
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultanti
❑� Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: South 36R, LLC
Mailing Address: 4400 Silas Creek Parkway, Suite 302
Winston-Salem, NC, 27104
Telephone Number: 336-722-2236
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
South 36R, LLC, O. Rolf Blizzard, III Managing Director for Manager
Print Name
Capacity: ❑x Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
9/25/19
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
0 I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
s For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminM JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
✓❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 50.369 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.187711
Longitude:-80.931289
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I Ix17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hM2://www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
F4 USGS Topographic Map
0 Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
0 Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑✓ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
hJ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/readocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see hM?://www.saw.usace.army."I/Missions/Re atory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION L• BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Beam Road Industrial Park, Charlotte and Asheville Regulatory Field
Offices, [phone]
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County/parish/borough: Mecklenburg City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.187711' -, Long.-80.931289' �t.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Sugar Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Unnamed tributary to Sugar Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 030501030103
'Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc... ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
'Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION IL• SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There r� "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or maybe susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There M "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): r
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
II Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 288 linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0.11 acres.
Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Not Applicable.
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
Non -regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):'
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain: On August 8, 2019 Terracon conducted a field survey for potential streams and wetlands by following
protocols as stated in the Army Coprs of Engineers' (ACOE) delineation manual and the April 2012 Eastern
Mountains and Piedmont Regional supplement as well as the NC Department of Water Quality Divisions'
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
s Supporting documentation is presented in Section HIT.

Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins protocols for identification of
streams. Using these methods, it was determined that six non -jurisdictional features were identified on site. These
ephemeral non -jurisdictional upland drainage features did not meet the minimal three necessary criteria of
intermittent or perennial streams and so did not meet the definition of "Waters of the U.S." These ephemeral non -
jurisdictional upland drainage features exhibited minimal geomorphic indicators and exhibited no hydrological or
biological indicators associated with intermittent or perennial streams.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.AA and 2
and Section III.DA.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.DA.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: RPW-1 = 7 acres. RPW-2 = 10 acres -
Drainage area: LPick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through I tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
'Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ® Natural
® Artificial (man-made). Explain: See below.
® Manipulated (man -altered). Explain: Adjacent lands have been heavily altered from historic
agricultural practices and commercial developments. Tributaries are impounded by a man made pond.
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 2 feet
Average depth: 3 feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
® Cobbles ® Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover.
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: Conditions of RPW 1 and 2 experience
impervious surface runoff from adjacent properties.
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: RelativeLstraight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for. Ftermittent but not seasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Discrete and confm4 Characteristics: Surface flow is confined to the channel with inputs from
surrounding landforms.
Subsurface flow: ,Ilnkn yi. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
® changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
®
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
®
sediment sorting
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
®
scour
® sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
® water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
High Tide Line indicated by: 0 Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
® Wetland fringe. Characteristics: Intermittent stream flows directly into northern portion of Wetland
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: 0.11 acres
Wetland type. Explain: Headwater wetland.
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Intermittent flov4. Explain: RPW 2 flows into Wetland 1.
Surface flow is: Discrete and confmA
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick Lisj. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
® Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 1 (or less) river miles from TNW.
Project waters etland
(or less) aerial strai t miles from TNW.
Flow is from: to navigable
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 500-year or greater floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: Water from wetland is clear and exhibits characteristics of those normally found in an
urban setting.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
® Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain: Wetland 1 supports typical vegetation found in urban wetland settings.
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if an�
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis:
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Y 0.11
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: Wetland 1 supports the typical
biological activites associated with wetlands found in an urban setting by providing habitat, housing, and food sources for aquatic
and terrestial species, and improves water quality by providing physical and chemical filtration.
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section IILD:
2. These ephemeral non -jurisdictional upland drainage features did not meet the minimal hydrological, chemical, or biological criteria
necessary for connectivity to TNW's, in addition these features did not meet the definition of "Waters of the U.S." These ephemeral
non jurisdictional upland drainage features exhibited minimal geomorphic indicators and exhibited no hydrological or biological
indicators associated with intermittent or perennial streams..
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section IILD:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:

Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IILB. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: Terracon conducted a field survey for potential streams and wetlands by following protocols as stated in the Army
Coprs of Engineers' (ACOE) delineaiton manual and the April 2012 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional supplement as
well as the NC Department of Water Quality Divisions' Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams
and Their Orgins protocols for identification of streams. Using these methods it was determined that two RPWs and one
wetland were identified on site.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 288 linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: intermittent stream.
Non-RPWs1 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section IILD.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section IILB and rationale in Section IILD.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.1lacres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters?
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):ro
'See Footnote # 3.
' To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section 111.13.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.

❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
'Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands: acres.
F. NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
'Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other. (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non -jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
udgment (check all that apply):
Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: 1,123 linear feet. acres. List type of aquatic resource:
dWetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non -jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a fmding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: ephemeral upland drainage features .
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: Depiction of aquatic resources.
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps:FEMA Flood Map3710452200K, effective on 9/21/2015.
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous detern ination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable/supporting case law:
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

RPW 1 (INTERMITTENT):
—135 LINEAR FEET
r
—0.025 ACRES s'
ET AND,
_
—0.11'ACRES
NON -JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE 2:
—31 LINEAR FEET
L
NON. IURISDICTIONAL FEATURE 3:
—290 LINEAR FEET
14
P
NON -JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE 1•.
—140 LINEAR FEET +r
RPW 2 (INTERMITTENT):
—153 LINEAR FEET
—OA33 ACRES
"
NON�IURISDICTIONAL FEATURE 4:
—151 LINEAR FEET
- E
0
rn
0
NONURISDICTIONAL FEATURE 5:
N
The apprloximate wetlands and non -wetlands lines depicted
^1::
90 LINEAR FEET
� "' -
o
on this drawing were flagged and surveyed with a Trimble
-
Ir
_
Geo7x GPS with GNSS receiver in the field by Terracon
Consultants, Inc. on July 8, 2019. Each survey point was at
-•
-
NON -JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE 6.
sub-meteraccuracy.
—321 LINEAR FEET `• r ,
Total Project Area = 54.0 Acres
L ,_
Total Approximate Non -wetlands Waters = -288 Linear Feet /_-_
0.058 Acres
_
Total Approximate Wetlands = -0.11 Acres
Total Approximate Non jurisdictional Features = 1,123 Linear
'1
p
Legend
Feet
X
`D
TO(1 "
F'3e
I1,harl0
0 Site Boundary
0 250 500 1,000
RPW (Intermittent)
f
Wetlands
Ephemeral Channel DATA SOURCES:
�
ESRI WMS -World Aerial Imagery, OpenStreetMap
�
I
00 tf
Z
N
,r
Project No.:
LL
DEPICTION OF AQUATIC RESOURCES Exhibit
71197469
irerracon
I77
�3 US 21
Jul2019
Beam Road Warehouse
°
J
Daawn B
TPO
(35.186217,-80.929781)
�
o
© OpenStreetMap)(and)
2701 Westport Road
Reviewed By:
Charlotte, NC 28208
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
N
contributors, CC -BY -SA
JAR I PH. [phone]
terracon.com
2
z

NON-�IURISDICTIO
=290 LINEAR FEEL
;W 2 (INTERMITTEN
53 LINEAR FEETM
a 1
� t
ti
S i r:55 1
1 1 7.
s
OpenStreetMap (and)
contributors, CC -BY -SA
Legend
j� Site Boundary RPW (Intermittent)
Wetlands Ephemeral Channel
Project No.:
71197469
Date:
Jul 2019
Drawn By:
TPO
Reviewed By:
JAR
Irerracon
q
LA
Feet
0 50 100 200
DATA SOURCES:
ESRI VVMS -World Aerial Imagery, OpenStreetMap
DEPICTION OF AQUATIC RESOURCES
Beam Road Warehouse
(35.186217,-80.929781)
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Exhibit
1B

Sit U55
Q a�
s
OpenStreetMap (and)
contributors, CC -BY -SA
1
[ROP�' (INTERMITTENT):
5 LINEAR FEET'P025 ACRES
Legend
Site Boundary RPW (Intermittent)
Wetlands Ephemeral Channel
Project No.:
71197469
Date:
Jul2019
Drawn By:
TPO
Reviewed By:
JAR
Irerracon
n.Y�i� 1C.11f�T1A� Al nTllec�
Feet
0 50 100 200
DATA SOURCES:
ESRI WMS - World Aerial Imagery, OpenStreetMap
DEPICTION OF AQUATIC RESOURCES
Beam Road Warehouse
(35.186217,-80.929781)
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Exhibit
1A

NON:IURISDICTIO
=31'LINEAR FEET
PIC
3 �
i
Sit U55 1
0 1 7.
s
OpenStreetMap (and)
contributors, CC -BY -SA
NON-�IURISDICTIONAUFEATURE 1-
=140 LINEAR FEET
Legend
j� Site Boundary RPW (Intermittent)
Wetlands Ephemeral Channel
Project No.:
71197469
Date:
Jul 2019
Drawn By:
TPO
Reviewed By:
JAR
Irerracon
2701 Westport Road Charlotte, NC 28208
PH- [phone] terracon-com
Feet
0 50 100 200
DATA SOURCES:
ESRI VVMS - World Aerial Imagery, OpenStreetMap
DEPICTION OF AQUATIC RESOURCES
Beam Road Warehouse
(35.186217,-80.929781)
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Exhibit
1C

NON!,IURISDICTIONAL'FEATURE 4:
—151 LINEAR FEET
i
�4
JURISDICTIOI
LINEAR FEET
_ � t
3 �
i
KA t
S4 r255 1
�a
13
� I I+ r
x� tco
OpenStreetMap (and)
contributors, CC -BY -SA
A
URISDICTIONAU
INEAR FEETM
1s.
x
Legend Feet
0 50 100 200
j� Site Boundary RPW (Intermittent)
0
Wetlands Ephemeral Channel DATASOURCES:
ESRI WMS - World Aerial Imagery, OpenStreetMap
I
z
m
0
Project No.:
71197469
Date:
Jul 2019
Drawn By:
TPO
Reviewed By:
JAR
Irerracon

LEGEND:
Project Manager:
PRK
Approximate site boundary
Drawn by:
JCW
Indicates parcel owned
Checked by: PRK
by the City of Charlotte.
pproved by:
PRK
PUBHh Indicates freshwater pond.
Projeco.
t
US FWS NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY
Exhibit
Scale:
1: 6,818 Irerracon
Beam Road Industrial Park
File Name: Beam Road at Westoak Drive 3
Exhibit 4 2701 Westport Road Charlotte, North Carolina
Date: Charlotte, NC
Se tember 2019

CD
�R E OF MAN It1A1�IL�FLO�U
f f ■ a Or
r` �
L ■
6.
LEGEND:
ri Approximate site boundary
Indicates parcel owned
by the City of Charlotte.
Project Manager: Project No.
PRK 71197469
Drawn by: Scale:
JCW NTS
Checked by: File Name: PRK Exhibit 3A
pproved by: Date:
PRK September 2019
L
Irerracon
2701 Westport Road
Charlotte, NC
z
LEGEND
r M4hod t• n"d nrmum IEM
g1Ad4t 11-DID} With E7 rt'a p1hJ[ d — i Ja
XA7:M0 APOLkS RhUmb-z ltarlms}
02%OhnuM{hero rlmd Iran rR Am
d 1Rarruai Il cha i ccd f wfh A I i
depth Ima tlmri crm "d ba at drarml
mom d W Gmri w y r rrd h
RrYas Candrfaa'lk *mLM
1111�Flocc !06 r .—
A afih R adurmd Fk d 121h dim I -
R !RiL l7F F Lt 5a Moan'--L
rLoco HkV RG ".11"o km afh n"l dw lz�LCM0.
icam A OMait l rcd Ilaurd
6f "m Ll3ira
crn• E R AAKAfr rk of 4.4z11=rmrMd Rood Fimrd .
rlrrEPAl ---- Chm wd Cmkmc or r,_—Swan
STRR[Tl1A ES 11 11 • 11 Lama Cftm. a lfacdmi
E �
s sa.a C=s Saniom skn 1\Ana Lod Curs
iaa Mlsr Ssdm:a Ekmzbm
Il ar-d n , Lrm;Ef4
Lrrif SbEly
halmia,an MzMdWf
-•— -- mab Marom Qam hm
tarn tr _ prr r Nod rm
ffATuA ES i& 14 r rn
DO" t3rd 111iY
M of" !Taft dkalrbts
IhNFrh4XEL5 Uft-EmEd
4:) Ttispirbm~-dmvmrruphmsw=h. 4
l34r: mW1*c trY rm uw and dOS RM rya
Y JJl iur-rrM prgmM ir3dfa.
n" nap C*ffwm 0 W..i I'MA a I rdada for dm ma ci
QdW Road rrulz If a ■ rm"as dmcrdmd hivar.
Tta b a H%W miawn torn �Ms am 1ENNs bowrrW
maaaaT maadar&
Ths icd hmaM rftrrtm63n a dread d nn} ham Mrs
m *n b" 14194Ly batik pi nm d be MINA TFm map
am mod an P 3 20110 J: 153 =: r`h' and dm aal
nRaadur¢ m srrmdmards aibbagimir kz�lam dies and
!lira Tha Ffi mid s1ldJhamlmrromonmr} afuVa ar
lb x wpsrmfd 4 r data r hrr
Ttsa nap Trays hvdd d the arm anise ce lM 4f�rg Ti ap
aitTr I do nm appau- ha mmmp rrmprr. Rmd m afar
iysK mui bar. nop cuffbm4Wx carrr mf? ids rLMm
1711{7l1 pm rml nm bx mod 111 a s0mciha 4r4s. Map 4as&& fir
urriappmd and imEEkwirad mmm vmM tm u d1w
-W Mar} RsPsmm
FEMA NATIONAL FLOOD HAZARD FIRMette MAP Exhibit
Beam Road Industrial Park
Beam Road at Westoak Drive 3A
Charlotte, North Carolina

10 �
ri
A iro^.
a
h
A, A
ip fit
r lk
F,
t
a
J
Project Manager:
Project No.
LEGEND:
Approximate site boundary
PRK
71197469
Irerracon
NRCS WEB SOIL SURVEY MAP
Exhibit
Drawn by:
Scale:
Beam Road Industrial Park
JCW
NTS
Indicates parcel Owned
Checked by:
File Name:
Exhibit 4
Beam Road at Westoak Drive
4
by the City Of Charlotte.
PRK
2701 Westport Road
Charlotte, North Carolina
pprovedby:
PRK I
Date:
September 2019
Charlotte, NC

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
0
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
0
Landfill
A.
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
o
Sodic Spot
Soil Map —Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
MAP INFORMATION
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Stony Spot
th
Very Stony Spot
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Wet Spot
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
4�
Other
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
Special Line Features
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Transportation
—
Rails
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
. 0
Interstate Highways
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
US Routes
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Major Roads
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Local Roads
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
Background
Aerial Photography
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 17, Sep 10, 2018
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 23, 2014—Nov
28, 2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9/3/2019
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map —Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CeB2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
224.8
66.9%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
CeD2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15
41.8
12.4%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
MO
Monacan loam, 0 to 2 percent
2.0
0.6%
slopes, frequently flooded
PaE
Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25
58.7
17.5%
percent slopes
PaF
Pacolet sandy loam, 25 to 45
1.8
0.5%
percent slopes
W
Water
6.7
2.0%
Totals for Area of Interest
336.8
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9/3/2019
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
In in
In in
506100 506200 506300 506400 506500 506600 506700 506800
35° 11' 28" N \� 35° 11' 28" N
� y
+4■� + 'F
0. 1F
5� AIN
RA
�R K
Tot
- i
�; •I r ,f Ni
4
5
r
Soil Malvin not Ise valiel.at this scale.
350 10' 54" N - I - - 350 10' 54" N
506100 506200 506300 506400 506500 50660D 506700 506800
m
Map Scale: 1:5,140 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
Meters
$ N 0 50 100 200 300 $
Feet
0 200 400 �0 1200
Map projection: Web Mercator Conermordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9/3/2019
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
0
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Rating
Polygons
W
Hydric (100%)
0
Hydric (66 to 99%)
0
Hydric (33 to 65%)
0
Hydric (1 to 32%)
0
Not Hydric (0%)
0
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating
Lines
~
Hydric (100%)
r 0
Hydric (66 to 99%)
r 0
Hydric (33 to 65%)
r 0
Hydric (1 to 32%)
r r
Not Hydric (0%)
r 0
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating
Points
Hydric (100%)
Hydric (66 to 99%)
0
Hydric (33 to 65%)
0
Hydric (1 to 32%)
Not Hydric (0%)
0
Not rated or not available
Water Features
x
Streams and Canals
Transportation
i--1-+ Rails
­0 Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 17, Sep 10, 2018
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 23, 2014—Nov
28, 2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9/3/2019
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Hydric Rating by Map Unit
Map unit symbol
Map unit name
Rating
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CeB2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2
to 8 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
0
46.3
67.4%
PaE
Pacolet sandy loam, 15
to 25 percent slopes
0
20.1
29.3%
W
Water
0
2.2
3.3%
Totals for Area of Interest
68.6
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9/3/2019
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Description
This rating indicates the percentage of map units that meets the criteria for hydric
soils. Map units are composed of one or more map unit components or soil
types, each of which is rated as hydric soil or not hydric. Map units that are made
up dominantly of hydric soils may have small areas of minor nonhydric
components in the higher positions on the landform, and map units that are made
up dominantly of nonhydric soils may have small areas of minor hydric
components in the lower positions on the landform. Each map unit is rated based
on its respective components and the percentage of each component within the
map unit.
The thematic map is color coded based on the composition of hydric
components. The five color classes are separated as 100 percent hydric
components, 66 to 99 percent hydric components, 33 to 65 percent hydric
components, 1 to 32 percent hydric components, and less than one percent
hydric components.
In Web Soil Survey, the Summary by Map Unit table that is displayed below the
map pane contains a column named 'Rating'. In this column the percentage of
each map unit that is classified as hydric is displayed.
Hydric soils are defined by the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils
(NTCHS) as soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding
long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the
upper part (Federal Register, 1994). Under natural conditions, these soils are
either saturated or inundated long enough during the growing season to support
the growth and reproduction of hydrophytic vegetation.
The NTCHS definition identifies general soil properties that are associated with
wetness. In order to determine whether a specific soil is a hydric soil or nonhydric
soil, however, more specific information, such as information about the depth and
duration of the water table, is needed. Thus, criteria that identify those estimated
soil properties unique to hydric soils have been established (Federal Register,
2002). These criteria are used to identify map unit components that normally are
associated with wetlands. The criteria used are selected estimated soil properties
that are described in "Soil Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 1999) and "Keys to Soil
Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 2006) and in the "Soil Survey Manual" (Soil Survey
Division Staff, 1993).
If soils are wet enough for a long enough period of time to be considered hydric,
they should exhibit certain properties that can be easily observed in the field.
These visible properties are indicators of hydric soils. The indicators used to
make onsite determinations of hydric soils are specified in "Field Indicators of
Hydric Soils in the United States" (Hurt and Vasilas, 2006).
References:
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9/3/2019
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18.
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources
Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436.
Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to soil taxonomy. 10th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Percent Present
Component Percent Cutoff.- None Specified
Tie -break Rule: Lower
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9/3/2019
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 5

�r r
00
46q-
- M
•J w ,
MKS
r r f
N VA■ A
/A4
Ir
low
• s !
�•'i►+. Wetland 1 Data Point , • �� �,!
qP
ti Jbe 1
j{{ i � '�• � err • •ip
�,� . `• _ 1 �
•
IVA
top
,
4r`4 y •
4.
�'. !- r �• 'ram ►` -
LEGEND:
Approximate site boundary
Indicates parcel owned
by the City of Charlotte.
Project Manager:
Project No.
PRK
71197469
PHOTO LOG LEGEND
Exhibit
Drawn by: JCW
NTS Scale:
Irerracon
Beam Road Industrial Park
Checked by:
File Name:
Beam Road at Westoak Drive
5
PRK
t6
2701 Westport Road
pproved by:
Date:
Charlotte, NC
Charlotte, North Carolina
PRK i
lSei)tember 2019

Project No. 71197469 lrerracan
Date Photos Taken: July 8, 2019 Coosultlog Englneen&Scientists
,Q% 3560N (T) OO 35011'11"N, 80055'45"W ±315.Oft ♦ 659ft
Photo 1 View of Wetland 1, facing north.
0 940E (T) O 35011'10"N, 80055'46"W ±78.7ft ♦ 658ft
Photo 2 View of Wetland 1, facing east.
Beam Road Industrial Park, Charlotte, NC.

E SE SWi "` l 1
90 120 150 V 210 A6 2
I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 f I I I•
dw
77
I,h
�"�_ .r "''e � • ��.�� .mac'; SF .,...r,� � R � ,;� — 5-..s,- ::>.'.
��rC+i �.rt' y � �� •`t ;. '- -.lY `.�`. 1 '9 �_' tiff � ��!!•�.` ��Y%+} �"�k,, v
r ��,,,�: �'� .•.- ••' +i sue_,'
• • 3 Viewof - • 1, facing south.
- svv �,, = W J NW N
24` r,y '.> L00 330 0
:0'551441-W ±315.Oft A •
.i.il4jP; `�, J i�-.k r � ���� �� .T,.'r �.• r A^ � y' y �';, '
� _ x' +g .� �:a'r.- Rif + •��� u
-a.,�'s'9`�,w

sw 1 J NW
180 210 240 21D 300 330
fk
A
Aira.
sw VI t NW
210 240 300 330
40"
ot
_Mar

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority: AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 71197469 BEAM ROAD INDUSTRIAL PARK City/County: CHARLOTTE/ MECKLENBURG Sampling Date: 7/8/19
Applicant/Owner:
SEEFRIED INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES/ SOUTH 36 LLC. State: NC Sampling Point: Wetland 1
Investigator(s): TPO and PRK Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.18771 Long:-80.931289
Soil Map Unit Name: Cecil (CeB2) sandy clay loam and Pacolet (PaE) sandy loam. NWI classification:
Slope (%): 2-5
Datum:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_Surface Water (Al)
_True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ High Water Table (A2)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_Saturation (A3)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Water Marks (131)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Drift Deposits (133)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Iron Deposits (135)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: wetland 1
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Asimina triloba
20 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Acerrubrum
10 No
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3. Carpinus caroliniana
15 Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4. Fraxinus americana
10 No
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5. Ulmus americana
10 No
FACW
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60.0% (A/B1
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
65 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
33 20% of total cover:
13
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
1. Ligustrum sinense
40 Yes
FACU
FAC species 50 x 3 = 150
2.
FACU species 60 x 4 = 240
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 120 (A) 410 (B
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.42
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
40 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
9
m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless c
11.
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Parthenocissus quinquefolia
10 Yes
FACU
2. Smilax rotundifolia
5 Yes
FAC
3. Vitis rotundifolia
FAC
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
15 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Wetland 1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type'
Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-8
7.5YR 4/2
70
5YR 4/6 30 C
M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
8-14
7.5YR 4/4
60
5YR 4/6 40 C
M
Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
14-18
7.5YR 5/4
40
5YR 4/6 60 C
M
Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric S
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority: AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 71197469 BEAM ROAD INDUSTRIAL PARK City/County: CHARLOTTE/ MECKLENBURG Sampling Date: 7/8/19
Applicant/Owner: SEEFRIED INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES/ SOUTH 36 LLC. State: NC Sampling Point: Upland
Investigator(s): TPO and PRK Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.18771 Long:-80.931289
Soil Map Unit Name: Cecil (CeB2) sandy clay loam and Pacolet (PaE) sandy loam. NWI classification:
Slope (%): 2-5
Datum:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_Surface Water (Al)
_True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ High Water Table (A2)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Saturation (A3)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Water Marks (131)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Drift Deposits (133)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Iron Deposits (135)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
G FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Upland
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
30 Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2. Acerrubrum
10 No
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3. Carpinus caroliniana
20 Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4. Liquidambar styraciflua
15 No
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5. Carya glabra
15 No
FACU
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B1
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
90 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Ligustrum sinense
60 Yes
FACU
FAC species 60 x 3 = 180
2.
FACU species 105 x 4 = 420
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 165 (A) 600 (B
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.64
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
- Dominance Test is >50%
9.
-2
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
60 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
9
m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless c
11.
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
15 Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
15 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5 7.5YR 3/3 99 2.5YR 4/6 1 C M
5-8 2.5YR 4/6 95 7.5YR 3/3 5 C M
C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric S
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 7/8/2019
Project/site: 71197469
Latitude: 35.187711
Evaluator: TPO
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude:-80.931289
Total Points:
Stream is least intermittent 16
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
at
E hemera Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
Q
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
O
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2)
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
CD
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
ED
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 2.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 3 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
7
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
Form is representative for all non -jurisdictional features 1-6 as identified on
Exhibit 1.

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS (PIN)
PIN
ACREAGE
PROPERTY OWNER
14312201
8.94
SOUTH 36R LLC
14312202
11.6
SOUTH 36R LLC
14312204
1.15
SOUTH 36R LLC
14312205
0.93
SOUTH 36R LLC
14312206
1.53
SOUTH 36R LLC
14312207
1.39
SOUTH 36R LLC
14312208
0.76
SOUTH 36R LLC
14312210
0.81
SOUTH 36R LLC
14312211
0.85
SOUTH 36R LLC
14312212
4.15
SOUTH 36R LLC
14312213
2.21
SOUTH 36R LLC
14312214
2.33
SOUTH 36R LLC
14312215
2.21
SOUTH 36R LLC
14312216
2.09
SOUTH 36R LLC
14312217
1.94
SOUTH 36R LLC
14312220
7.21
SOUTH 36R LLC

MECKLENBURG COUNTY— PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID:14312201 SOUTH 36RLLC
4625 BEAM RD CHARLOTTE NC 4400 SILAS CREEK PKWY, SUITE 302
WINSTON-SALEM NC 27104
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
Land Use Desc
Exemption/Deferment
Last Sale Date
Last Sale Price
Legal Description
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Land Value
Building Value
Features
Total
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Story
Foundation
Full Bath(s)
Total (SgFt)
0400 Neighborhood
IN04
OFFICE Land
389426 SQUARE FEET
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
NA
NA
Notice of 2019 Real Estate Assessed Value
Year Built Built Use / Style
Heat Fuel
External Wall Fireplace(s)
Half Bath(s) Bedroom(s)
Total Appraised Value
$493,400
$492,000
$0
$1,400
$493,400
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
0400 389426 SQUARE FEET IN04 $492,000
FEATURES
Year Built Type Quantity Units Value
1960 DWELLING 1 1 $0
1900 STORAGE 1 200 $1,200
-1900 PUMP HOUSE 1 : 36 $200
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these
are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or
listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$493,400
12/13/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$779,800
05/09/2012
2011
Board of Equalization and Review - Decision
$779,800
03/17/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$2,493,200
04/21/2010
2010
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
$1,753,300
05/19/2008
2008
CORRECTION OF LAND AREA:AC/SQ FT/DIM
$3,636,600
10/18/2003
2003
EQUALIZATION OF VALUE
$4,165,200
03/15/2003
2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$4,685,800
44 .4 T1 -A
500 ft
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate Information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data herein, Its use or interpretation.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID:14312202
SOUTH 36R LLC
3311 BEAM RD CHARLOTTE NC
4400 SILAS CREEK PKWY, SUITE 302
WINSTON-SALEM NC 27104
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 1600
Neighborhood
Land Use Desc INDUSTRIAL
Land
Exemption/Deferment
Municipality
Last Sale Date
Fire District
Last Sale Price
Special District
Legal Description NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Notice of 2019 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
Building Value
Features
Total
BUILDING (1)
IN04
486129.6 SQUARE FEET
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
Total Appraised Value
$554,400
$554,400
$0
$0
$554,400
Finished Area
Year Built Built Use / Style
Story
Heat Fuel
Foundation
External Wall Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s) Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood Assessment
1600 486129.6
SQUARE FEET IN04 $554,400
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows
only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these
are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing
from this list or
listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessors Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019 COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$554,400
,12/13/2014
2011 REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$972,300
05/09/2012
2011 Board of Equalization and Review - Decision
$972,300
03/17/2011
.2011 COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$3,889,000
04/21/2010
12010 DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
$1,823,000
OS/19/2008
.2008 CORRECTION OF LAND AREA:AC/SQ FT/DIM
$1,890,800
03/15/2003
2003 COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$2,010,000
115b
500i t
71

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 14312204
SOUTH 36R LLC
3311 BEAM RD CHARLOTTE NC
4400 SILAS CREEK PKWY. SUITE 302
WINSTON-SALEM NC 27104
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 1600
Neighborhood
Land Use Desc INDUSTRIAL
Land
Exemption/Deferment
Municipality
Last Sale Date
Fire District
Last Sale Price
Special District
Legal Description L6 &STR U/M
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Notice of 2019 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
Building Value
Features
Total
BUILDING (1)
IN04
50226 SQUARE FEET
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
Total Appraised Value
$162,000
$162,000
$0
$0
$162,000
Finished Area
Year Built Built Use / Style
Story
Heal Fuel
Foundation
External Wall Fireplace(s)
Full Baths)
Half Bath(s) Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood Assessment
1600 .50225
SQUARE FEET IN04 $162,000
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history
shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these
are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or
listed in the wrong order.
If you have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year Reason for Change New Value
01/15/2019
2019 COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION $162,000
'01/23/2013
12012 Board of Equalization and Review - Decision $100,500
12/13/2014
2011 REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON $100,500
03117/2011
12011 COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION $90,400
200 ft
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 14312205
SOUTH 36R LLC
3311 BEAM RD CHARLOTTE NC
4400 SILAS CREEK PKWY. SUITE 302
WINSTON-SALEM NC 27104
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 1600
Neighborhood
Land Use Desc INDUSTRIAL
Land
ExemptionlDeferment
Municipality
Last Sale Date
Fire District
Last Sale Price
Special District
Legal Description L7 &STR U/M
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Notice of 2019 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
Building Value
Features
Total
BUILDING (1)
IN04
40772 SQUARE FEET
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
Total Appraised Value
$131,500
$131,600
$0
$0
$131,500
Finished Area
Year Built Built Use / Style
Story
Heat Fuel
Foundation
External Wall Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s) Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood Assessment
1600 40772
SQUARE FEET IN04 $131,500
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history
shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these
are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or
listed in the wrong order.
If you have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year Reason for Change New Value
01/15/2019
2019 COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION $131,500
01/23/2013
2012 Board of Equalization and Review - Decision $81,500
12/13/2014
2011 REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON $81,500
03/17/2011
2011 COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION $73,400
200 ft
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY - PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 14312206
SOUTH 36R LLC
3311 BEAM RD CHARLOTTE NC
4400 SILAS CREEK PKWY, SUITE 302
WINSTON-SALEM NC 27104
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 1600
Neighborhood
Land Use Desc INDUSTRIAL
Land
Exemption/Deferment
Municipality
Last Sale Date
Fire District
Last Sale Price
Special District
Legal Description L3 & 8 & STIR U/M
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Notice of 2019 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
Building Value
Features
Total
BUILDING (1)
IN04
66690 SQUARE FEET
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
Total Appraised Value
$212,900
$212,900
$0
$0
$212,900
Finished Area
Year Built Built Use / Style
Story
Heat Fuel
Foundation
External Wall Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s) Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood Assessment
1600 66690
SQUARE FEET IN04 $212,900
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history
shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these
are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or
listed in the wrong order.
If you have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year Reason for Change New Value
01/15/2019
2019 COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION $212,900
01/23/2013
2012 Board of Equalization and Review - Decision $133,400
i 12/13/2014
2011 REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON $133,400
03/17/2011
2011 COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION $120,000
m
uZ
200 ft
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data herein, its use or Interpretation.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 14312207
SOUTH 36R LLC
4620 BEAM RD CHARLOTTE NC
4400 SILAS CREEK PKWY, SUITE 302
WINSTON-SALEM NC 27104
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 1600
Neighborhood
IN04
Land Use Desc INDUSTRIAL
Land
60504 SQUARE FEET
Exemption/Deferment
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description 1-7 BSTR U/M
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Notice of 2019 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
Building Value
Features
Total
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area Year Built
Built Use / Style
Story Heat
Fuel
Foundation External Wall
Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s) Half Bath(s)
Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
Total Appraised Value
$195,100
$195,100
$0,
$0
$195,100
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
11600 60504 SQUARE FEET IN04 $195,100
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these
are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or
listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$195,100
01/23/2013
2012
Board of Equalization and Review - Decision
$121,000
12/13/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$121,000
03/17/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
p $105,900
ri
200 ft
go
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 14312208
SOUTH 36R LLC
4600 BEAM RD CHARLOTTE NC
4400 SILAS CREEK PKWY, SUITE 302
WINSTON-SALEM NC 27104
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 1600
Neighborhood
IN04
Land Use Desc INDUSTRIAL
Land
33018 SQUARE FEET
Exemption/Deferment
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description L2 U/M
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Notice of 2019 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
Building Value
Features
Total
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
Built Use / Style
Story
Heat
Fuel
Foundation
External Wall
Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
Total Appraised Value
$106,500
$106,600
$0
$0
$106,500
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
1600 33018 SQUARE FEET IN04 $106,500
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these
are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or
listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$106,500
01/23/2013
2012
Board of Equalization and Review - Decision
$66,000
12/13/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$66,000
03/17/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$69,400
LZ
100 ft
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 14312210 SOUTH 36R LLC Total Appraised Value
4226 BEAM RD CHARLOTTE NC 4400 SILAS CREEK PKWY, SUITE 302 $114,200
WINSTONSALEM NC 27104
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
1600 Neighborhood IN04
Land Use Desc
INDUSTRIAL Land 36414 SQUARE FEET
Exemption/Deferment
Municipality CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District NA
Legal Description
L4 U/M
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Notice of 2019 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$114,200
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$114,200
No buildings to show.
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood Assessment
1600 35414
SQUARE FEET t IN04 $114,200
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these
are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or
listed in the wrong order.
If you have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year Reason for Change New Value
01/15/2019
2019 COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION $114,200
01/23/2013
2012 Board of Equalization and Review - Decision $70,800
12/13/2014
2011 REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON $70,800
03/17/2011
2011 COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION $63,700
10/21/2009
2009 CLERICAL CORRECTION IN VALUE $63,700
100 ft
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or Implied, are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 14312211
SOUTH 36R LLC
4238 BEAM RD CHARLOTTE NC
4400 SILAS CREEK PKWY, SUITE 302
WINSTONSALEM NC 27104
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 1600
Neighborhood
Land Use Desc INDUSTRIAL
Land
Exemption/Deferment
Municipality
Last Sale Date
Fire District
Last Sale Price
Special District
Legal Description L5 U/M
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Notice of 2019 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
Building Value
Features
Total
BUILDING (1)
IN04
36590 SQUARE FEET
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
Finished Area
Year Built
Built Use / Style
Story
Heat
Fuel
Foundation
External Wall
Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
Bedroom(s)
Total(SgFt)
Total Appraised Value
$118,000
$118,000
$0
$0
$118,000
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
1600 136590 SQUARE FEET IN04 $118,000
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these
are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or
listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change Effective for Tax Year
01/15/2019 2019
,12/13/2014 2011
0
03/17/2011 2011
R
i
3
200 ft
Reason for Change
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
New Value
$118,000
$73,200
$73,200
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY -- PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 14312212 SOUTH 36R LLC
3311 BEAM RD CHARLOTTE NC 4400 SILAS CREEK PKWY, SUITE 302
WINSTON-SALEM NC 27104
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 1600 Neighborhood
Land Use Desc INDUSTRIAL Land
Exemption/Deferment Municipality
Last Sale Date Fire District
Last Sale Price Special District
Legal Description NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Notice of 2019 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
Building Value
Features
Total
IN04
172105 SQUARE FEET
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
Built Use / Style
Story
Heat
Fuel
Foundation
External Wall
Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
Total Appraised Value
$351,800
$351,800
$0
$0
$351,800
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
1600 - 172105 SQUARE FEET INCA $351,800
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these
are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or
listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$351,800
01/23/2013
i
2012
Board of Equalization and Review - Decision
$344,200
12/13/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$344,2pp
03/17l2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$309,800
03/15/2003
2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
1$309,800
,o
500 n
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY - PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 14312213
SOUTH 36R LLC
4430 BEAM RD CHARLOTTE NC
4400 SILAS CREEK PKWY, SUITE 302
WINSTON-SALEM NC 27104
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 1600
Neighborhood
Land Use Desc INDUSTRIAL
Land
Exemption/Deferment
Municipality
Last Sale Date
Fire District
Last Sale Price
Special District
Legal Description NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Notice of 2019 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
Building Value
Features
Total
BUILDING (1)
IN04
95876 SQUARE FEET
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
Finished Area
Year Built
Built Use / Style
Story
Heat
Fuel
Foundation
External Wall
Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
Total Appraised Value
$227,000
$227,000
$0
$0
$227,000
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
1600 95876 SQUARE FEET IN04 $227.000
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these
are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or
listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/20'19
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$227,000
,12/13/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW -PEARSON
$191,800
03/17/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$191,800
200 ft
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY - PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 14312214 SOUTH 36R LLC
4418 BEAM RD CHARLOTTE NC 4400 SILAS CREEK PKWY, SUITE 302
WINSTON-SALEM NC 27104
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 1600
Land Use Desc INDUSTRIAL
Exemption/Deferment
Last Sale Date
Last Sale Price
Legal Description NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Land Value
Building Value
Features
Total
BUILDING (1)
Neighborhood
Land
Municipality
Fire District
Special District
Notice of 2019 Real Estate Assessed Value
IN04
101887 SQUARE FEET
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
Finished Area
Year Built
Built Use / Style
Story
Heat
Fuel
Foundation
External Wall
Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
Total Appraised Value
$229,900
$229,900
$9
$0
$229,900
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
1600 101887 SQUARE FEET IN04 $229,900
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these
are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or
listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$229,900
12/13/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$203,800
03/17/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$203,800
14] 1i E 14
200 ft
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY— PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 14312215
SOUTH 36R LLC
Total Appraised Value
4406 BEAM RD CHARLOTTE NC
4400 SILAS CREEK PKWY, SUITE 302
$227,200
WINSTON-SALEM NC 27104
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 1600
Neighborhood IN04
Land Use Desc INDUSTRIAL
Land 96316 SQUARE FEET
Exemption/Deferment
Municipality CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District NA
Legal Description NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Notice of 2019 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$227,200
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$227,200
No buildings to show.
LAND
Use Units Type
Neighborhood Assessment
1600 96316 SQUARE FEET
IN04 1$227,200
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these
are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or
listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions, please call the County Assessors Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change . Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$227,200
i01/15/2019
12/13/2014 2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$196,200
OW20/2012 2011
Board of Equalization and Review - Decision
$196,200
`03/17/2011 2011
: COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$291,100
03/15/2003 2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$290,800
200 ft
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the mosYaccurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 14312216
SOUTH 36R LLC
3311 BEAM RD CHARLOTTE NC
4400 SILAS CREEK PKWY, SUITE 302
WINSTON-SALEM NC 27104
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 1600
Neighborhood
Land Use Desc INDUSTRIAL
Land
Exemption/Deferment
Municipality
Last Sale Date
Fire District
Last Sale Price
Special District
Legal Description NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Notice of 2019 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
Building Value
Features
Total
BUILDING (1)
IN04
91476 SQUARE FEET
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
Finished Area
Year Built
Built Use / Style
Story
Heat
Fuel
Foundation
External Wall
Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
Total Appraised Value
$224,900
$224,900
$0
$0
$224,900
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
11600 91476 SQUARE FEET IN04 $224,900
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these
are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or
listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$224,900
12/1312014
.2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$183,000
03/17/2011
2011
j COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$183,000
W1212003
' 2003
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
$183,000
200It
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or Implied, are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID:14312217
SOUTH 36R LLC
3311 BEAM RD CHARLOTTE NC
4400 SILAS VREEK PKWY. SUITE 302
WINSTON-SALEM NC 27104
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 1600
Neighborhood
Land Use Desc INDUSTRIAL
Land
Exemption/Deferment
Municipality
Last Sale Date
Fire District
Last Sale Price
Special District
Legal Description NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Notice of 2019 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
Building Value
Features
Total
BUILDING (1)
IN04
84680 SQUARE FEET
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
Total Appraised Value
$221,600
$221,600
SO
$0
$221,600
Finished Area Year Built Built Use / Style
Story Heat Fuel
Foundation External Wall Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s) Half Bath(s) Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
1600 ' 84680 SQUARE FEET IN04 $221,600
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these
are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or
listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change Effective for Tax Year Reason for Change New Value
01/15/2019 2019 COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION $221,600
r12/13/2014 2011 ! REVALUATION REVIEW -PEARSON $169,400
03/17/2011 2011 COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION $169,400
;03/15/2003 2003 COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION $169,400
200 ft
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data herein, its use or Interpretation.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY - PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 14312220
SOUTH 36R LLC
3311 BEAM RD CHARLOTTE NC
4400 SILAS CREEK PKWY, SUITE 302
WINSTONSALEM NC 27104
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 1600
Neighborhood
IN04
Land Use Desc INDUSTRIAL
Land
314068 SQUARE FEET
ExemptionlDeferment
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Notice of 2019 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
Building Value
Features
Total
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
Built Use / Style
Story
Heat
Fuel
Foundation
External Wall
Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
Total Appraised Value
$443,400
$443,400
$0
$0
$443,400
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
1600 314068 SQUARE FEET IN04 $443,400
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these
are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or
listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
01/16/2019
12/13/2014
05/09/2012
03/1712011
04/21/2010
t0-
'�i3x
500 It
Effective for Tax Year
2019
2011
2011
2011
2010
�tY
am-
Reason for Change
I COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
I Board of Equalization and Review - Decision
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible- No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation.
New Value
$443,400
$628,100
$628,100
$2,010.000
$942.200