NC0074756_Fact Sheet_20190923 (2)

FACT SHEET FOR EXPEDITED PERMIT RENEWALS
This form must be completed by Permit Writers for all expedited permits which do not require
full Fact Sheets. Expedited permits are generally simple 100% domestics (e.g., schools, mobile
home parks, etc) that can be administratively renewed with minor changes, but can include
facilities with more complex issues (Special Conditions, 303(d) listed water, toxicity testing,
instream monitoring, compliance concerns).
Basic Information for Expedited Permit Renewals
Permit Writer / Date
Brianna Young 9/23/19
Permit Number
NCO074756
Facility Name / Facility Class
Greater Badin WWTP / WW-3
Basin Name / Sub -basin number
Yadkin Pee -Dee / 03-07-08
Receiving Stream / HUC
Little Mountain Creek / 0304010402
Stream Classification / Stream Segment
WS-IV / 13-5-1- 2
Does permit need Daily Maximum NH3
limits?
N/A — monthly and weekly limits present
Does permit need TRC limits/language?
Alread resent
Does permit have toxicity testing? IWC (%) if
so
Yes; IWC = 83.4%
Does permit have Special Conditions?
Yes — Effluent pollutant scan
Does permit have instream monitoring?
Yes — DO, TN, TP, temperature
Is the stream impaired on 303 d list)?
Yes — see below
Any obvious compliance concerns?
Yes — see below
Any permit mods since lastpermit?
None
New expiration date
1/31/2024
Comments on Draft Permit?
Yes — see below
Facility Overview:
The Greater Badin WWTP is a Class III facility with a current permitted flow of 0.550
MGD. The facility services the Town of Badin with a population of 1550. The Greater
Badin WWTP influent wastewater is primarily domestic in nature, with additional flow
from seepage from an Alcoa landfill located on Alcoa property into the collection system
1/2 mile from the facility on Wood Street (estimated flows of up to 7500 gpd). Permittee is
a member of the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin Association. Instream monitoring is
waived in light of the facility participation in the Yadkin Pee -Dee Monitoring
Association. Instream monitoring will be immediately reinstated should facility end its
participation in the Association.
The Town of Badin is currently under a moratorium for exceeding 80% of their hydraulic
treatment capacity (per letter dated April 14, 2015).
Pretreatment:
No pretreatment program is required at this time but may change in the future if problems
arise with the landfill leachate.

303(d) listing:
13-5-1-(2) Little Mountain Creek
From a point 0.5 mile upstream of Stanly County SR 1545 to Mountain Cr.
Classification WS-IV Length or Area 7 FW Miles
Assessment Criteria Status Reason for Rating Parameter of Interest Category
Exceeding Criteria Fair Fish Community (Nar, AL, FW) 5
Compliance History (July 2014 — July 2019):
• 2 NOVs for fecal coliform weekly mean exceedances
• 3 NODs, 6 NOVs, 1 enforcement case for flow monthly average exceedances
• 1 NOD for BOD frequency violation
• 1 NOD and 2 NOVs for fecal coliform frequency violations
• 1 NOD for ammonia nitrogen frequency violation
• 1 NOD for TSS frequency violation
• Passed all toxicity tests since January 2015
RPA:
The maximum monthly average flow between June 2016 and May 2019 was
approximately 0.845 MGD.
• Fluoride — No RP, predicted max > 50 % of allowable Cw; Quarterly monitoring
applied
• Zinc — No RP, predicted max < 50% of allowable Cw, no monitoring required
• Chloroform — No RP, predicted max < 50% of allowable Cw, no monitoring
required
• Mercury — RP; monthly monitoring with limit applied
Changes from previous permit to draft:
• Updated eDMR footnote in A(1) and language in A(3)
• Updated outfall map
• Added regulatory citations
• Updated stream characteristics on the Supplement to Permit Cover Sheet
• Added facility grade in A(1)
• Updated limit for TRC in A(1) based on WLA with maximum, monthly average
flow in previous 36 months
• Removed chloroform monitoring in A(1) based on RPA

• Removed manganese monitoring in A(1) as there is no longer a water quality
standard
0 2009 permit factsheet: Manganese was added based on RPA — 1 data point
used of 1.4, chronic limit was 265 ug/L; RPA said limited dataset so
monthly monitoring added to permit
0 2013 permit factsheet: Manganese showed RP, but monitoring was
reduced to quarterly since all reported values were less than half the
allowable concentration and the WQ standard
• Added monitoring and limit for mercury based on RPA
• Updated IWC in A(1) and A(2) based on maximum, monthly average flow from
the previous 36 months
• Removed footnote #6 in A(1) stating "Monitoring should be performed in
conjunction with toxicity testing" as this is no longer required
• Updated tox language in A(2)
• Updated years for effluent pollutant scan in A(4)
Changes from draft to final:
• None
Comments received on draft permit:
• Roberto Scheller (MRO; via email 7/16/19):
o The Greater Badin WWTP facility is of concern to this Office because the
connection of 7500 gallons per day of landfill leachate. The leachate is
generated from the ALCOA/Town of Badin combined landfill. Before
collection of leachate, sampling from the toe ditches of the landfill tested
high in Fluoride and Cyanide. A SOC (EMC SOC WQ S03-010) was
issued to this facility that became effective on January 1, 1999. The SOC
modified effluent monitoring requirements included the sampling for
Cyanide. The landfill is located approximately 152 yards down gradient of
the Old Badin Works (ALCOA site). Sampling from Alcoa, Inc — Badin
Works (NC0004308) outfall #005 had the following results:
■ Sample collected for Cyanide 02/06/2019 — 0.128 mg/l (Samples
collected after rain event)
■ 02/12/2019 — 0.11 mg/1(Sample collected before rain event)
■ 02/21/2019 — 0.019 mg/l (Sample collected week of no rain)
o Landfill is located approximately 200 yards from Alcoa Outfall# 005. This
outfall is permitted to discharge non -contact cooling water, condensate,
compressor condensate, fire protection waters, and groundwater. At time
of sampling the discharge consisted of groundwater. It is therefore
recommended that Cyanide sampling be added to the new permit.
o DWR response: Cyanide monitoring was added in the 2004 permit, but
was removed in the 2009 permit based on the RPA (no reasonable
potential; all values < 5 µg/L between March 2006 and November 2008).
In addition, cyanide monitoring is already required in the permit per the
effluent pollutant scan. The effluent pollutant scans from 2015, 2016, and

2017 all showed cyanide values < 5 µg/L. There is no additional data in
which to base cyanide monitoring requirements on. Therefore, cyanide
monitoring will not be added to the effluent table in Section A. (1), but
will remain present in the effluent pollutant scan requirement. This request
can be reconsidered at the next permit renewal when additional data is
available.
• Hannah Headrick (Aquatic tox; via email 8/9/19):
o Pages 4 and 5 — the testing concentration is listed at 83.4%. We have 77%
in our database and that what was on the previous permit. Just wondering
why the change and which is correct.
■ DWR Response: The IWC was updated based on the reasonable
potential analysis (RPA) and waste load allocation (WLA)
performed with this renewal. These take into account the
maximum monthly average discharge in the previous 36 months as
well as any dilution the facility may be getting.
o Page 6 - It appears that a statement from the ATB templates for this type
of testing is missing from the explanation of Chronic Toxicity Monitoring:
If the Permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than
required by this permit, the results of such monitoring shall be included in
the calculation and reporting of the data submitted on the DMR and all
AT Forms submitted.
Please clarify why this statement was not included on these pages. If this
was a simple omission, please include this statement on these pages of the
permit
■ DWR Response: We use templates for the toxicity conditions in
permits. If it was not present in the permit, it's because it's not
present in the templates we use. If this should be included, all
toxicity language templates that we use will need to be updated.
• Clinton Cook (PWS; via email 9/5/19): Concurs with issuance of permit provide
the following conditions are met:
o Samples collected and measurements taken, as required by the permit,
shall be representative of the permitted discharge. Samples collected at a
frequency les than daily shall be taken on a day and time that is
representative of the discharge for the period of time that the sample
represents. If effluent water characteristics fluctuate such that a single
sample cannot represent the period of time that the sample is intended to
represent, additional samples shall be collected.

Tt- Publisher's Affidavit Of Publication
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
PUBLIC NOTICE
STANLY COUNTY
North Carolina Environmental
Management
Commission/NPDES Unit
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said County and
1617 Mail Service Center
State, duly commissioned, qualified and authorized by law
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
to administer oaths, personally appeared; Roger Watson,
Notice of Intent to Issue
who being first duly sworn, deposes and says; that he is
a NPDES Wastewater Permit
Publisher of a newspaper known as THE STANLY NEWS &
The North Carolina Environmental
PRESS, published, issues and entered as second class mail
in the City of Albemarle, in said County and State; that he is
es to issue
es to issue a NPDES wastewater
discharge permit to the person(s)
authorized to make this affidavit and sworn statement; that
listed below. Written comments re-
garding the proposed permit will
the notice or other legal advertisement, a true copy of which
be accepted until 30 days after
is attached hereto, was published in THE STANLY NEWS &
the publish date this notice. The
PRESS on the dates specified on the copy attached.
Director of the NCof
C Division of Wa-
ter Resources (DWR) may hold a
public hearing should there be a
The said newspaper in which such notice, paper, document
significant degree of public inter -
est. Please mail comments and/
or legal advertisement was published was, at the time of
DWR
or information requests DWR
each and every such publication, a newspaper meeting all
at the above address. Intt
persons may visit the DWR at 512
of the requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 or
N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC
the General Statures of North Carolina and was a qualified
to review information on file. Addi-
tional information on NPDES per -
newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597 of the Gen-
mils and this notice may befound
eral Statures of North Carolina. Said notice or other legal
on our website: htto://deq.nc.c�v/
,n
abouUdivisions/water-resources!
advertisement, a true copy of which was attached hereto,
water-resources-permits/waste-
was published in the THE STANLY NEWS & press, on the
water-branch/nodes-wastewater/
public-notices,or by calling (919)
following dates:
707-3601. Stanly County Utilities
has requested renewal of permit
NCO074756 for the Greater Badin
WWTP in Stanly County; this per-
08/13/19
mitted discharge is treated waste-
water to Little Mountain Creek in
the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin.
This discharge may affect future
At a cost of $101.50
allocations in this portion of the
watershed.
Account #: 164061
August 13, 2019
Tagline: PUBLIC NOTICE North
Purchase Order #:
1wr__ 4t__
(signature of person making affidavit)
Sworn and subscribed before me on 08/08/19.
Notary Public. s
My commission expires 07/14/2021

From: Scheller, Roberto
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 1:15 PM
To: Young, Brianna A
Cc: Basinger, Corey
Subject: Greater Badin WWTP (NC0074756)
The Greater Badin WWTP facility is of concern to this Office because the connection of 7500 gallons per
day of landfill leachate. The leachate is generated from the ALCOA/Town of Badin combined
landfill. Before collection of leachate, sampling from the toe ditches of the landfill tested high in
Fluoride and Cyanide. A SOC (EMC SOC WQ S03-010) was issued to this facility that became effective on
January 1, 1999. The SOC modified effluent monitoring requirements included the sampling for
Cyanide. The landfill is located approximately 152 yards down gradient of the Old Badin Works (ALCOA
site). Sampling from Alcoa, Inc — Badin Works (NC0004308) outfall #005 had the following results:
Sample collected for Cyanide 02/06/2019 — 0.128 mg/l (Samples collected after rain event)
02/12/2019 — 0.11 mg/l (Sample collected before rain event)
02/21/2019 — 0.019 mg/1 (Sample collected week of no
rain)
Landfill is located approximately 200 yard from Alcoa Outfall# 005. This outfall is permitted to discharge
non -contact cooling water, condensate, compressor condensate, fire protection waters, and
groundwater. At time of sampling the discharge consisted of groundwater. It is therefore
recommended that Cyanide sampling be added to the new permit. If you should have any questions or
require a site visit please contact me.
Roberto L. Scheller
NC Dept. of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
610 E. Center Ave., Sute 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Ph: 704-235-2204 Fax: [phone]

From: Headrick, Hannah
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2019 10:43 AM
To: Young, Brianna A
Cc: Moore, Cindy
Subject: RE: Draft NPDES permits to public notice
Brianna —
Good morning.
Below are ATB's comments on the two draft permits.
Please be patient with me as I learn this new role. Cindy and I are going through these documents
together and to make sure that we both understand what is going on with these.
Thanks!
Draft NPDES Permit NCO086011— Neilson WTP
* Cover Letter and Page 1 — noticed that the address — has been updated.
* Page 4 - It appears that a statement from the ATB templates for this type of testing is missing
from the explanation of Chronic Toxicity Monitoring:
If the Permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by
this permit, the results of such monitoring shall be included in the
calculation and reporting of the data submitted on the DMR and all AT
Forms submitted.
Please clarify why this statement was not included on these pages. If this was a simple
omission, please include this statement on these pages of the permit.
Draft NPDES Permit NCO074756 — Greater Badin WWTP
* Pages 4 and 5 — the testing concentration is listed at 83.4%. We have 77% in our database
and that what was on the previous permit. Just wondering why the change and which is
correct.
* Page 6 - It appears that a statement from the ATB templates for this type of testing is missing
from the explanation of Chronic Toxicity Monitoring:
If the Permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by
this permit, the results of such monitoring shall be included in the
calculation and reporting of the data submitted on the DMR and all AT
Forms submitted.
Please clarify why this statement was not included on these pages. If this was a simple
omission, please include this statement on these pages of the permit.
Hannah
Hannah Headrick
Environmental Biologist
Division of Water Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
Please note new number - 919 743 8439
[e-mail]
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Young, Brianna A
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2019 7:43 AM
To: Headrick, Hannah <[e-mail]>

Subject: Draft NPDES permits to public notice
Good morning Hannah,
Attached are the Neilson WTP (NC0086011) and Greater Badin WWTP (NC0074756) draft NPDES
permits, which were submitted to public notice this week. Please provide any comments by September
6th.
Thank you,
Brianna Young
Environmental Specialist II
Compliance and Expedited Permitting Branch
Division of Water Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
Office: 919-707-3619
[e-mail]
Mailing address:
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretory
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
August 7, 2019
MEMORANDUM
To: Clinton Cook
NC DEQ / DWR / Public Water Supply
Mooresville Regional Office
From: Brianna Young
Compliance and Expedited Permitting Unit
Subject: Review of Draft NPDES Permit NCO074756
Greater Badin WWTP
Stanly County
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the draft permit and return this form by
September 6, 2019. If you have any questions on the draft permit, please contact me at 919-707-3619
or via e-mail [[e-mail]].
RESPONSE: (Check one)
❑Concur with the issuance of this permit provided the facility is operated and maintained properly,
the stated effluent limits are met prior to discharge, and the discharge does not contravene the
designated water quality standards.
Concurs with issuance of the above permit, provided the following conditions are met:
1. Samples collected and measurements taken, as required by the permit, shall be representative
of the permitted discharge. Samples collected at a frequency less than daily shall be taken on
a day and time that is representative of the discharge for the period of time that the sample
represents. If effluent water characteristics fluctuate such that a single sample cannot represent
the period of time that the sample is intended to represent, additional samples shall be
Collected.
Opposes the issuance of the above permit, based on reasons stated below, or attached:
Signed: IZka�, U , (�X�
Date: ,T M
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919-707-9000

Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence Using Metal Translators
MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58
rREQUIRED DATA ENTRY CHECK WQS
Table 1. Proiect Information
Facility Name
WWTP/WTP Class
NPDES Permit
Outfal I
Flow, Ow (MGD)
Receiving Stream
HUC Number
Stream Class
❑ CHECK IF HQW OR ORW WQS
Greater Badin WWTP
WW-3
NCO074756
001
0.845
Little Mountain River
0304010402
WS-IV
El Apply WS Hardness WQC
7010s (cfs)
7010w (cfs)
30Q2 (cfs)
CIA (cfs)
1010s (cfs)
0.26
0.28
5.60
0.22
Effluent Hardness
Upstream Hardness
----------------------------
Combined Hardness Chronic
----------------------------
Combined Hardness Acute
59.33 mg/L (Avg)
25 mg/L (Avg)
53.65 mg/L
54.4 mg/L
Data Source(s)
❑ CHECK TO APPLY MODEL
Par01
Par02
Par03
Par04
Par05
Par06E
Par07
Par08
Par09
Par10
Par11
Par12
Par13
Par14
Par15
Par16
Par17
Par18
Par19
Par20
Par21
Par22
Par23
Par24
Table 2. Parameters of Concern
Name WGS Type Chronic Modifier Acute PQL Units
Arsenic
Aquactic Life
C
150
FW
340
ug/L
Arsenic
Human Health Water Supply
C
10
HH/WS
N/A
ug/L
Beryllium
Aquatic Life
NC
6.5
FW
65
ug/L
Cadmium
Aquatic Life
NC
1.0505
FW
6.3846
ug/L
Chlorides
Aquatic Life
NC
230
FW
mg/L
Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds
water Supply
NC
1
A
ug/L
Total Phenolic Compounds
Aquatic Life
NC
300
A
ug/L
Chromium III
Aquatic Life
NC
220.0353
FW
1710.8581
ug/L
Chromium VI
Aquatic Life
NC
11
FW
16
pg/L
Chromium, Total
Aquatic Life
NC
N/A
FW
N/A
pg/L
Copper
Aquatic Life
NC
15.1332
FW
21.7848
ug/L
Cyanide
Aquatic Life
NC
5
FW
22
10
ug/L
Fluoride
Aquatic Life
NC
1,800
FW
ug/L
Lead
Aquatic Life
NC
6.9044
FW
179.9206
ug/L
Mercury
Aquatic Life
NC
12
FW
0.5
ng/L
Molybdenum
Human Health
NC
2000
HH
ug/L
Nickel
Aquatic Life
NC
71.0327
FW
647.0796
pg/L
Nickel
Water Supply
NC
25.0000
WS
N/A
pg/L
Selenium
Aquatic Life
NC
5
FW
56
ug/L
Silver
Aquatic Life
NC
0.06
FW
1.1288
ug/L
Zinc
Aquatic Life
NC
242.0315
FW
242.9040
ug/L
Chloroform
water Supply
C
5.8
WS
pg/L
Mercury
Aquatic Life
NC
12
FW
0.5
ng/L
NCO074756 Final FW RPA, input
9/23/2019

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Use "PA STE SPECIAL
Effluent Hardness Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
Date Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
10/20/2015
54 54
Std Dev.
4/19/2016
72 72
Mean
4/12/2017
52 52
C.V. (default)
n
10th Per value
Average Value
Max. Value
11.0151 1
59.3333 2
0.6000 3
3 4
52.40 mg/L 5
59.33 mg/L 6
72.00 mg/L 7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Upstream Hardness Values"then"COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
25 25 Std Dev. N/A
Mean
25.0000
C.V.
0.0000
n
1
10th Per value
25.00 mg/L
Average Value
25.00 mg/L
Max. Value
25.00 mg/L
2-
NCO074756 Final FW RPA, data
9/23/2019

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Part
Par21
Par22
Use"PASTE SPECIAL
Use"PASTE SPECIAL
Use"PASTE SPECIAL
Fluoride
Values" then "COPY"
Zinc
Values"men"Copy'
Chloroform
Values"then"COPY"
. Maximum data
. Maximum data
. Maximum data
points = 58
points = 58
points = 58
Date Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
Date Data BDL=1/2DL
Results
Date Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1 1/13/2015 450
450
Std Dev.
351.0679
1
10/20/2015 21 21
Std Dev.
3.0551
1 1/13/2015 <
5
2.5
Std Dev.
1.4540
2 4/14/20,5 780
780
Mean
616.1111
2
4/19/2016 19 19
Mean
18.3333
2 4/14/2015 <
5
2.5
Mean
3.2714
3 7/14/2015 620
620
C.V.
0.5698
3
4/12/2017 15 15
C.V. (default)
0.6000
3 7/14/2015 <
5
2.5
C.V.
0.4445
4 10/13/2015 430
430
n
18
4
n
3
4 10/13/2015
5.2
5.2
n
21
5 1/12/2016 750
750
5
5 1/12/2016 <
5
2.5
6 4/12/2016 510
510
Mult Factor =
1.39
6
Mult Factor =
3.00
6 4/12/2016 <
5
2.5
Mult Factor =
1.25
7 7/19/2016 340
340
Max. Value
1500.0 ug/L
7
Max. Value
21.0 ug/L
7 7/19/2016
5.4
5.4
Max. Value
6.900000 pg/L
8 10/12/2016 280
280
Max. Fred Cw
2085.0 ug/L
8
Max. Pred Cw
63.0 ug/L
8 10/12/2016 <
5
2.5
Max. Pred Cw
8.625000 pg/L
9 1/24/2017 320
320
9
9 1/24/2017 <
5
2.5
10 4/11/2017 260
260
10
10 4/11/2017 <
5
2.5
11 7/19/2017 380
380
11
11 7/19/2017 <
5
2.5
12 10/11/2017 390
390
12
12 10/11/2017
6.1
6.1
13 1/25/2018 360
360
13
13 1/25/2018 <
5
2.5
14 4/18/2018 650
650
14
14 4/18/2018
5.1
5.1
15 7/18/2018 830
830
15
15 7/18/2018 <
5
2.5
16 10/9/2018 1500
1500
16
16 10/9/2018 <
5
2.5
17 1/16/2019 1300
1300
17
17 1/16/2019 <
5
2.5
18 4/9/2019 940
940
18
18 4/9/2019 <
5
2.5
19
19
19 10/20/2015
6.9
6.9
20
20
20 4/19/2016 <
5
2.5
21
21
21 4/12/2017 <
5
2.5
22
22
22
23
23
23
24
24
24
25
25
25
26
26
26
27
27
27
28
28
28
29
30
29
30
29
3
31
31
31
32
32
32
33
33
33
34
34
34
35
35
35
36
36
36
37
37
37
38
38
38
39
39
39
40
40
40
41
41
41
42
42
42
43
43
43
44
44
44
45
45
45
46
46
46
47
47
47
48
48
48
49
49
49
50
50
50
51
51
51
52
52
52
53
53
53
54
54
54
55
55
55
56
56
56
57
57
57
58
58
58
NCO074756 Final FW RPA, data
3- 9/23/2019

Date Data
1 10/20/2015 3.8
2 4/19/2016 6.3
3 4/13/2017 5.9
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Mercury
Values"then"COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
BDL=1/2DL
Results
3.8
Std Dev.
1.3429
6.3
Mean
5.3333
5.9
C.V. (default)
0.6000
n
3
Mult Factor =
3.00
Max. Value
6.300000 ng/L
Max. Fred Cw
18.900000 ng/L
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
4-
NCO074756 Final FW RPA, data
9/23/2019

Greater Badin WWTP
NCO074756
Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence Using Metal Translators
MAXIMUM
Qw (MGD) =
0.8454
1Q10S (cfs) =
0.22
7Q10S (cfs) =
0.26
7Q10W (cfs) =
0.28
30Q2 (cfs) =
NO 30Q2 DATA
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) =
5.60
Receiving Stream:
Little Mountain River HUC 0304010402
DATA POINTS = 58
WWTP/WTP Class: WW-3
IWC% @ 1Q10S =
85.62373393
1WC% @ 7Q10S =
83.44265429
IWC% @ 7Q10W =
82.39325916
1WC% @ 30Q2 =
N/A
IW%C @ QA =
18.96155017
Stream Class:
WSW
Outfall 001
Qw = 0.84535484 M G D
COMBINED HARDNESS (me/L)
Acute = 54.4 mg/L
Chronic = 53.65 mg/L
YOU HAVE DESIGNATED THIS RECEIVING
STREAM AS WATER SUPPLY
Effluent Hard: 0 value > 100 mg/L
Effluent Hard Avg = 59.33 mg/L
PARAMETER
NC STANDARDS OR EPA CRITERIA
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
TYPE
a
Applied
Chronic Acute
n # Det. Max Pred Cw Allowable Cw
Standard
Acute: NO WQS
Fluoride
NC
1800 FW(7Q10s)
ug/L
18 18
2,085.0
Chronic: 2,157.2
_
No RP, Predicted Max t 50% of Allowable Cw
No value > Allowable Cw
apply Quarterly Monitoring
Acute: 283.7
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowable Cw - No
Zinc
NC
242.0315 FW(7Q10s) 242.9040
ug/L
3 3
63.0
Monitoring required
Note: n < 9
C.V. (default)
-----------------------------
Chronic: 290.1
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowable Cw - No
Limited data set
No value > Allowable Cw
Monitoring required
Acute: NO WQS
Chloroform
C
5.8 WS(Qavg)
µg/L
21 5
8.62500
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic: 30.58822
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowable Cw - No
No value > Allowable Cw
Monitoring required
Acute: NO WQS
Mercury
NC
12 FW(7Q10s)
0.5
ng/L
3 3
18.90000
Note: n <_ 9
C.V. (default)
Chronic: 14.38113
RP shown -apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
Limited data set
No value > Allowable Cw
NCO074756 Final FW RPA, rpa
Page 5 of 50 9/23/2019

NH3/TRC WLA Calculations
Facility: Greater Badin WWTP
PermitNo. NC0074756
Prepared By: Brianna Young
Enter Design Flow (MGD): 0.845355
Enter s7Q10 (cfs): 0.26
Enter w7Q10 cfs : 0.68
Total Residual Chlorine (TRC)
Daily Maximum Limit (ug/1)
Ammonia (Summer)
Monthly Average Limit (mg NH3-N/1)
s7Q10 (CFS)
0.26
s7Q10 (CFS)
0.26
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.845355
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.84535
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
1.3103
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
1.3103
STREAM STD (UG/L)
17.0
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.0
Upstream Bkgd (ug/1)
0
Upstream Bkgd (mg/1)
0.22
IWC (%)
83.44
IWC (%)
83.44
Allowable Conc. (ug/1)
20
Allowable Conc. (mg/1)
1.2
Ammonia (Winter)
Monthly Average Limit (mg NH3-N/1)
Fecal Coliform
w7Q10 (CFS)
0.68
Monthly Average Limit:
200/100ml DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.84535
(If DF >331; Monitor)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
1.3103
(If DF<331; Limit)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.8
Dilution Factor (DF)
1.20 Upstream Bkgd (mg/1)
0.22
IWC (%)
65.83
Allowable Conc. (mg/1)
2.6
Total Residual Chlorine
1. Cap Daily Max limit at 28 ug/I to protect for acute toxicity
Ammonia (as NH3-N)
1. If Allowable Conc > 35 mg/I, Monitor Only
2. Monthly Avg limit x 3 = Weekly Avg limit (Municipals)
3. Monthly Avg limit x 5 = Daily Max limit (Non-Munis)
If the allowable ammonia concentration is > 35 mg/L, no limit shall be imposed
Fecal Coliform
1. Monthly Avg limit x 2 = 400/100 ml = Weekly Avg limit (Municipals) = Daily Max limit (Non -Muni)

Draft 2018 NC Category 5 Assessments "303(d) List" for EPA Submittal
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin
13-16 Clarks Creek
From source to Pee Dee River
13-5-1-(1)
Classification I C I Length or Area
\ssessment Criteria Status Reason for Rating JEEW
Exceeding Criteria Fair
Little Mountain Creek
From source to a point 0.5 mile upstream of Stanly County SR 1545
Classification L Length or Area L
\ssessment Crit
06— now —
Exceeding Criteria Fair
13-5-1-(2) Little Mountain Creek
Upper Pee Dee Subbasin 03040104
13 Units FW Miles Previous AU Number
Parameter of Interest Category
Benthos (Nar, AL, FW)
1 Units LW Miles __] Previous AU Number
Benthos (Nar, AL, FW)
From a point 0.5 mile upstream of Stanly County SR 1545 to Mountain Cr.
Classification WS-IV Length or Area 6 Units FW Miles
\ssessment Criteria Status Reason for Rating Parameter of Interest
Exceeding Criteria � Fair Benthos (Nar, AL, FW)
13-5-(0.7) Mountain Creek
From Stanly County SR 1542 to a point 0.5 mile upstream of mouth
Classification WS-IV —1 Length or Area
Exceeding Criteria I Fair
9
� 0
Previous AU Number
7 Units FW Miles Previous AU Number
Paramet of Interest W Catee-
Fish Community (Nar, AL, FW)
5
Rocky Subbasin 03040105
3/29/2019 Draft 2018 NC Category 5 Assessments "303(d) List" for EPA Submittal Page 249 of 259

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing and Self Monitoring Summary
Grantsboro WTP
NCO088323/001
County: Pamlico
Mysd24PF
Begin:
11/1/2018 Ac P/F Monit: 90% M
NonComp:
J
F M
A
M
2015
Fail
2016
Pass
2017
Pass
2018
Pass
2019
Pass
Greater Badin Water& Sewer District
NCO074756/001
County: Stanly
Ceri7dPF
Begin:
3/1/2014
chr lim: 77%
NonComp:
J
F M
A
M
2015
Pass
Pass
2016
Pass
Pass
2017
Pass
Pass
2018
Pass
Pass
2019
Pass
Pass
Greensboro Osborne WWTP
NCO047384/001
County: Guilford
Ceri7dPF
Begin:
7/1/2014
chr lim: 90%
NonComp:
Single
J
F M
A
M
2015
95
>100
2016
>100
>100
2017
>100
>100
2018
Pass >100(P)
<22.5 >100(P)
>11
2019
>100
-
>100(P)
Greenville WTP
NCO082139/001
County: Pitt
Ceri7dPF
Begin:
6/1/2015
Chr Monit: 90%
NonComp:
J
F M
A
M
2015
Pass
Pass
2016
Fail
Fail
2017
Pass
Pass
2018
Pass
Fail
2019
Pass
Pass
Greenville WWTP
NCO023931/001
County: Pitt
Ceri7dPF
Begin:
3/1/2016
chr lim: 20%
NonComp:
Single
J
F M
A
M
2015
>80
2016
>80
2017
>80
2018
>80(P)Pass
2019
>80
Region: WARO
Basin: NEU10
Mar Jun Sep Dec
SOC JOC:
7Q10: NA
PF: NA IWC:
Freq: Q
J
J
A
S
O N
Pass
Pass
-
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
H
Pass
Region: MRO
Basin: YAD08
Jan Apr Jul Oct
SOC JOC:
7Q10: 0.26
PF: 0.55 IWC:
77 Freq: Q
J
J
A
S
O N
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Region: WSRO
Basin:
CPF02
Jan Apr Jul Oct
SOC JOC:
70.10:
2.1
PF: 40.0 IWC:
95 Freq: Q
I
J
A
S O
N
>100
>100
94.9 >100(P)
>100
>100
>100 >100(P)
>100
>100(P) Pass
Region: WARO
Basin:
TAR05
Jan Apr Jul Oct
SOC JOC:
7Q10:
PF: 1.2
IWC:
Freq: Q
J
J
A
S O
N
Pass
Fail
Pass
H
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Region: WARD
Basin:
TAR05
Mar Jun Sep Dec
SOC JOC:
7Q10:
109
PF: 17.5
IWC:
20 Freq: Q
J
J
A
S O
N
>80>80(P)
>80 -
>80
>80
>80(P)>80
Pass -
>80
H >80
D
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
r
G
C
D
>80
>80 >80(P)
Pass >80(P)
>80
Leeend: P= Fathead minnow (Pimohales aromelas). H=No Flow (facilitv is active). s = Salit test between Certified Labs
Page 51 of 125

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for:
Report Date:
07/12/19 Page:
1 of 3
Permit:
nc0074756
MRS Between 7 -
2014 and 7 - 2019
Region:
%
Violation
Category:%
Program Category:
Facility Name: %
Param Name %
County:
%
Subbasin: %
Violation Action: %
Major Minor:
%
PERMIT: NCO074756
FACILITY:
Greater Badin Water & Sewer District - Badin WWTP
COUNTY: Stanly
REGION: Mooresville
Limit Violation
MONITORING
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED
%
REPORT
OUTFALL
LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT
VALUE
Over
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
11 - 2015
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
11/16/15
3 X week
ug/I
22
24
9.1
Daily Maximum
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
11 - 2015
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
11/17/15
3 X week
ug/I
22
24
9.1
Daily Maximum
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
09 - 2016
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
09/06/16
3 X week
ug/I
22
23
4.5
Daily Maximum
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
10 - 2018
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
10/12/18
3 X week
ug/I
22
36
63.6
Daily Maximum
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
10 - 2018
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
10/16/18
3 X week
ug/I
22
25
13.6
Daily Maximum
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
10 - 2018
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
10/22/18
3 X week
ug/I
22
27
22.7
Daily Maximum
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
11 _ 2018
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
11/13/18
3 X week
ug/I
22
28
27.3
Daily Maximum
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
11 _ 2018
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
11/14/18
3 X week
ug/I
22
24
9.1
Daily Maximum
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
11 - 2018
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
11/16/18
3 X week
ug/I
22
28
27.3
Daily Maximum
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
11 -2018
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
11/21/18
3 X week
ug/I
22
30
36.4
Daily Maximum
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
04 - 2018
001
Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, MFC
04/28/18
3 X week
#/100ml
400
1,469.44
267.4
Weekly Geometric Mean
Proceed to NOV
Broth,44.5 C
Exceeded
11 _ 2018
001
Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, MFC
11/17/18
3 X week
#/100ml
400
2,348.92
487.2
Weekly Geometric Mean
Proceed to NOV
Broth, 44.5 C
Exceeded
03 - 2015
001
Effluent
Flow, in conduit or thru
03/31/15
Continuous
mgd
0.55
0.56
1.8
Monthly Average
Proceed to NOD
treatment plant
Exceeded
11 _ 2015
001
Effluent
Flow, in conduit or thru
11/30/15
Continuous
mgd
0.55
1.058
92.3
Monthly Average
Proceed to NOV
treatment plant
Exceeded
12 - 2015
001
Effluent
Flow, in conduit or thru
12/31/15
Continuous
mgd
0.55
1.073
95.0
Monthly Average
Proceed to
treatment plant
Exceeded
Enforcement Case
02 - 2016
001
Effluent
Flow, in conduit or thru
02/29/16
Continuous
mgd
0.55
0.655
19.1
Monthly Average
Proceed to NOV
treatment plant
Exceeded

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for:
Permit: nc0074756 MRs Between 7 - 2014 and 7 - 2019 Region: %
Facility Name: % Param Name % County: %
Major Minor: %
Report Date: 07/12/19 Page: 2 of 3
Violation Category:% Program Category: %
Subbasin:% Iq
Violation Action:
PERMIT: NCO074756
FACILITY: Greater Badin Water & Sewer District - Badin WWTP
COUNTY: Stanly
REGION: Mooresville
Limit Violation
MONITORING
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED
REPORT
OUTFALL
LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT
VALUE
Over
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
09 -2018
001
Effluent
Flow, in conduit or thru
09/30/18
Continuous
mgd
0.55
5.741
943.8
Monthly Average
None
treatment plant
Exceeded
11 - 2018
001
Effluent
Flow, in conduit or thru
11/30/18
Continuous
mgd
0.55
0.681
23.8
Monthly Average
Proceed to NOV
treatment plant
Exceeded
12 _ 2018
001
Effluent
Flow, in conduit or thru
12/31/18
Continuous
mgd
0.55
0.845
53.7
Monthly Average
Proceed to NOV
treatment plant
Exceeded
01 - 2019
001
Effluent
Flow, in conduit or thru
01/31/19
Continuous
mgd
0.55
0.738
34.1
Monthly Average
Proceed to NOV
treatment plant
Exceeded
02 - 2019
001
Effluent
Flow, in conduit or thru
02/28/19
Continuous
mgd
0.55
0.661
20.3
Monthly Average
Proceed to NOV
treatment plant
Exceeded
03 - 2019
001
Effluent
Flow, in conduit or thru
03/31/19
Continuous
mgd
0.55
0.563
2.4
Monthly Average
Proceed to NOD
treatment plant
Exceeded
04 - 2019
001
Effluent
Flow, in conduit or thru
04/30/19
Continuous
mgd
0.55
0.58
5.4
Monthly Average
Proceed to NOD
treatment plant
Exceeded
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED
%
REPORT
OUTFALL
LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT
VALUE
Over
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
11 -2014
001
Effluent
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) -
11/01/14
3 X week
mg/I
Frequency Violation
Proceed to NOD
Concentration
12 -2014
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
12/27/14
3 X week
ug/I
Frequency Violation
No Action, Facility
Reporting Error
11 - 2014
001
Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, MFC
11/01/14
3 X week
#/100ml
Frequency Violation
Proceed to NOD
Broth, 44.5 C
02 _ 2016
001
Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, MFC
02/06/16
3 X week
#/100ml
Frequency Violation
Proceed to NOV
Broth, 44.5 C
02 - 2016
001
Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, MFC
02/20/16
3 X week
#/100ml
Frequency Violation
Proceed to NOV
Broth, 44.5 C
11 -2014
001
Effluent
Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as
11/01/14
3 X week
mg/I
Frequency Violation
Proceed to NOD
N) - Concentration
02 -2019
001
Effluent
Oxygen, Dissolved (DO)
02/09/19
3 X week
mg/I
Frequency Violation
None

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for:
Permit: nc0074756 MRs Between 7 - 2014 and 7 - 2019 Region: %
Facility Name: % Param Name % County: %
Major Minor: %
Report Date: 07/12/19 Page: 3 of 3
Violation Category:% Program Category: %
Subbasin:% Iq
Violation Action:
PERMIT: NCO074756 FACILITY: Greater Badin Water & Sewer District - Badin WWTP COUNTY: Stanly REGION: Mooresville
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING VIOLATION UNIT OF CALCULATED
REPORT OUTFALL LOCATION PARAMETER DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE Over VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION
11 -2014 001 Effluent Solids, Total Suspended - 11/01/14 3 X week mg/I Frequency Violation Proceed to NOD
Concentration
01 _2016 001 Effluent Temperature, Water Deg. 01/02/16 5 X week deg c Frequency Violation No Action, Facility
Centigrade Reporting Error

HCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
RECEIVEDRNCDENR/DWR
April 14, 2015 APR 2 2 2015
CERTIFIED MAIL 7013 2630 0001 8998 0775
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Donna Davis, Director
Stanly County Utilities
1000 North First Street; Suite 12
Albemarle, NC 28001
Subject: Imposition of Sewer Line Moratorium
Demonstration of Future Wastewater Treatment Capacities
NPDES Permit NCO074756
Stanly County Utilities — Greater Badin WWTP
Stanly County
Dear Ms. Davis:
MOORESVILWOROS
LE REGIONAL. OFFICE
15A NCAC 02T .0118, "Demonstration of Future Wastewater Treatment Capacities," was adopted by
the Environmental- Management Commission to ensure that wastewater treatment systems owned or
operated by municipalities, counties, sanitary districts or public utilities do not exceed their hydraulic
treatment capacities. This Rule specifies that no permits for sewer line extensions will be issued by the
Division of Water Resources to facilities exceeding 80% of their hydraulic treatment capacity unless
specific evaluations of future wastewater treatment needs have been completed.
A review of your self monitoring reports has indicated flow at the subject facility exceeded the 80%
threshold for calendar year 2014. The average flow calculated for this period was 0.4748 MGD, and
represented 86.33% of the current treatment capacity. Therefore, we will be unable to approve any
further sewer line extensions for this facility until such time as you have complied with the requirements
contained in the Rule.
In order to attain compliance with the Rule, you must submit an approvable engineering evaluation of
future wastewater treatment needs. This evaluation must outline specific plans for system expansion
and include the sources of funding for the expansion. If future expansion is not proposed, a detailed
justification must be made based on past growth records and future growth projections and, as
appropriate, shall include conservation plans or other specific measures to achieve waste flow
reductions.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Phone:[phone] \Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper

Ms. Donna Davis
Greater Badin Sewer Line Moratorium
p. 2
To prevent delays in the processing of your future permit applications for sewer line extensions, please
submit a plan of action containing the information necessary to comply with the appropriate
demonstrations as described above to the following address:
DENR-DWR
Compliance & Expedited Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Provision For Sewer Line Approvals While On Moratorium
Per the terms of NCAC 02T .0118 (3), the Director may, on a case by case basis, allow permits to be
issued to facilities exceeding the 80 percent loading rate if 1) the additional flow will not cause the
facility to exceed its permitted hydraulic capacity, 2) the facility is in compliance with all other permit
limitations and requirements and 3) it is demonstrated that adequate progress is being made in
developing the required engineering evaluations or plans and specifications. Delegation for approval
and denial of such requests has been given to the Water Quality Regional Operations Supervisor for the
Mooresville Region. If you wish to ask for a waiver of the moratorium per this provision of the rule,
please send all required information in support of your request to the Mooresville Regional Office.
Any plans and specifications for expansion should be submitted to the Division of Water Infrastructure.
We look forward to working with you on development of plans to meet your future wastewater
treatment needs. If you have any questions. regarding this matter, please contact the Water Quality
Regional Operations staff of our Mooresville Regional Office at [phone], or Bob Sledge of the
Compliance & Expedited Permitting Unit at [phone]. E-mail correspondence may be directed to
Mr. Sledge at [e-mail].
;n4cery,
S. Jay Zimmerman, Director
Division of Water Resources
Attachment (15A NCAC 02T .0118)
cd ooresvil & egional Office
PERCS Unit
NPDES Files
Central Files

ROY COOPER NOR-,H CAROLINA
Gai:-Ewno? frrvironmenral Quafify
NUCHA1EL S- REC.GAN
Secrsta'
LINI]A CULPEPPER
IMreriRe Direcmr
October 17, 2018
Ms. Donna Davis, Utilities Director
Stanly County Department of Public Works
1000 North 1st Street
Albemarle, NC 28001
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Badin WWTP
NPDES Permit #NC0074756
Stanly County, NC
Dear Ms. Davis:
On August 30, 2018, Roberto Scheller of this Office conducted an inspection at the subject facility.
This inspection was conducted as a Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) to insure compliance with permit
requirements and conditions. At the time of inspection subject facility appeared to be well maintained and
operated. We wish to thank the operating staff for assistance regarding this inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact Roberto Scheller, of the Mooresville Regional Office, at 704-663-1699 or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
A14CC681AF27425...
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
D-EQ�
MysT.uN N Frv+bm.�.�1tl G1Wf
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
704-663-1699

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 IN 2 15 1 3 I NCO074756 111 12 I 18/08/30 I17 18 i d 19 i G i 201
21111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 f6
Inspection
Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 131 QA ---------------------- Reserved -------------------
671
70Igu 72 n73l—L 74 751 I I I I
71 tyI
80
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES oermit Number)
10:OOAM 18/08/30
14/03/01
Badin WWTP
NC Hwy 740 Off NCSR 1716
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
Badin INC 28009
12:10PM 18/08/30
19/01/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Earl Pearson Almond/ORC/704-422-3564/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Donna Davis,1000 N 1st St Albemarle NC 28001/Utilities
Director/704-986-3691/7049863711 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
DocuSigned by:
Roberto Scheller ES� MRO WQ//252-946-6481/ 10/15/2018
91C2A007838943E.-
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
W. Corey Basinger MRO WQ//704-235-2194/
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
DocuSigned by:
10/16/2018
E- Page#
A14CC681 AF27425...

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
NCO074756 I11 12, 18/08/30 117 18 JCJ
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Page#

Permit: NCO074756 Owner - Facility: Badin WWTP
Inspection Date: 08/30/2018 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
❑
❑
0
❑
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
❑
❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
❑
0
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The current permit was issued on March 1, 2014 and expires on January 31, 2019.
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: At time of inspection plant appeared to be well kept and operated.
Record Keeping
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
Yes No NA NE
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
■
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 3

Permit: NCO074756
Inspection Date: 08/30/2018
Record Keeping
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
Comment:
Owner - Facility: Badin WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees
Celsius)?
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
•
❑
❑
❑
•
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
Comment: Facility contracts with Environmental 1, Inc. (Certification #10) to perform analysis.
Temperature. pH. DO and chlorine residual is performed under field certification #5144.
Pump Station - Influent
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
Is the wet well free of excessive grease?
Are all pumps present?
Are all pumps operable?
Are float controls operable?
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
Comment:
Influent Sampling
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Is sample collected above side streams?
Is proper volume collected?
Is the tubing clean?
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees
Celsius)?
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
Comment: At time of inspection influent sampler was noted at 6 degree Celsius.
Yes No NA NE
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
Yes No NA NE
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
Page# 4

Permit: NCO074756
Inspection Date: 08/30/2018
Owner - Facility: Badin WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Bar Screens
Yes No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
b.Mechanical
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the unit in good condition?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Oxidation Ditches
Yes No NA NE
Are the aerators operational?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are the aerators free of excessive solids build up?
❑
❑
❑
❑
# Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
0
❑
❑
❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?
❑
❑
❑
Are settleometer results acceptable (> 30 minutes)?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
❑
❑
❑
Are settelometer results acceptable?(400 to 800 ml/I in 30 minutes)
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment: 30 minute settelometer test was conducted during insepction, MLSS settled quickly to 240
ml/I with a clear suDernatant above sludae blanket.
Secondary Clarifier
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
Are weirs level?
Is the site free of weir blockage?
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational?
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/4 of the sidewall depth)
I f-TINNSIM W
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
•
❑
❑
❑
•
❑
❑
❑
•
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
•
❑
❑
❑
•
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
Page# 5

Permit: NCO074756 Owner - Facility: Badin WWTP
Inspection Date: 08/30/2018 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Comment: At time of inspection effluent was clear with few visible suspended solids.
Disinfection -Gas
Yes No NA NE
Are cylinders secured adequately?
❑
❑
❑
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
❑
❑
❑
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
❑
❑
❑
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
0
❑
❑
❑
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
❑
❑
0
❑
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
❑
❑
0
❑
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000-
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
❑
❑
❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
❑
❑
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
0
❑
❑
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Effluent was reviewed at point of discharge into Little Mtn. Creek. At time of inspection no
foam or floating solids were noted at point of discharge.
Effluent Sampling
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
Is proper volume collected?
Is the tubing clean?
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type
representative)?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Sample analysis are performed by Environmental 1 Inc. of Greenville, NC (Labatory
Certification # 10). DO, pH, Temperature and C12 is performed under Field Certification
#5144. At time of inspection effluent sampler was noted at 4 degrees Celsius.
Page# 6

Permit: NC0074756
Inspection Date: 08/30/2018
Drying Beds
Is there adequate drying bed space?
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate?
Owner - Facility: Badin WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Are the drying beds free of vegetation?
# Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds?
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge?
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant?
# Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill?
# Is the sludge land applied?
(Vacuum filters) Is polymer mixing adequate?
Comment: Drying beds are used as needed.
Yes No NA NE
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
■
❑
Page# 7

STANLY COUNTY
Ate-, 14iw, `a4d' Saccms,
Emily Phillips, Environmental Specialist
NC Dept. of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resource!RECEIVEDIDENWDWR
Compliance & Expedited Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center JAN z019
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Ms. Phillips,
Water Resources
Permitting Sec
Please find attached the permit renewal application for the Greater Badin Wastewater Treatment
Plant (NPDES ID NC0074756) located in Badin, Stanly County, North Carolina. The Greater
Badin Water and Sewer District, operated by Stanly County Utilities is requesting renewal of the
existing permit. There have been no changes to the facility since issuance of the last permit.
Enclosed with this letter you will find one signed original and two copies of the NPDES from 2A
application and related documentation, one signed original and two copies of this cover letter and
one original and two copies of the sludge management plan for this facility.
Should you have any questions related to this application, please feel free to contact the Stanly
County Utilities Director, Duane Wingo at the address below, by email at
dwingogstanlycountync.gov or by phone at [phone]. Thank you for your review of this
request for our permit renewal.
Sincerely,
Dw,
Donna Davis
Director
www.stanlycountync-eov
Stanly County Utilities PI 704.986.3686
1000 N. First Street, Suite 12, Albemarle, NC 28001 F1 704.986.3711

NPDES APPLICATION FOR PERMIT RENEWAL - FORM A
For Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) or other treatment systems treating
domestic wastes < 0.1 MGD with no pretreatment program.
Mail the complete application to:
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NPDES Permit 000074756
If you are completing this form in computer use the TAB key or the up - down arrows to move from one
field to the next. To check the boxes, click your mouse on top of the box. Otherwise, please print or type.
1. Contact Information:
Owner Name
Stanly County Utilities
Facility Name
Greater badin WWTP
Mailing Address
1000 N 1st Street Suite 12
City
Albemarle
State / Zip Code
North Carolina 28001
Telephone Number
[phone]
Fax Number
[phone]
e-mail Address
[e-mail]
2. Location of facility producing discharge:
Check here if same address as above ❑
Street Address or State Road 18 NC 740 Hwy
City Badin
State / Zip Code North Carolina 28009
County Stanly
3. Operator Information:
Name of the firm, public organization or other entity that operates the facility. (Note that this is not
referring to the Operator in Responsible Charge or ORC)
Name Stanly County Utilities
Mailing Address 1000 N 1st Street Suite 12
City
State / Zip Code
Telephone Number
Fax Number
Albemarle
North Carolina 28001
[phone]
[phone]
4. Population served: 1516
1 of 3 Form -A 1/06

NPDES APPLICATION FOR PERMIT RENEWAL - FORM A
For Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) or other treatment systems treating
domestic wastes < 0.1 MGD with no pretreatment program.
5. Do you receive industrial waste?
® No ❑ Yes (if you have an approved pre-treatment program, must complete Form 2A)
6. Type of collection system
® Separate (sanitary sewer only) ❑ Combined (storm sewer and sanitary sewer)
7. Outfall Information:
Number of separate discharge points 1
Outfall Identification number(s) 01
Is the outfall equipped with a diffuser? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Name of receiving stream(s) (Provide a map showing the exact location of each outfallr
Little Mountain Creek
9. Frequency of Discharge: ® Continuous
If intermittent:
Days per week discharge occurs: 7
❑ Intermittent
Duration: 24 hours
10. Describe the treatment system
List all installed components, including capacities, provide design removal for BOD, TSS, nitrogen and
phosphorus. If the space provided is not sufficient, attach the description of the treatment system in a
separate sheet of paper.
See attached graphic
11. Flow Information:
Treatment Plant Design flow 0.550 MGD
Annual Average daily flow 0.367 MGD (for the previous 3 years)
Maximum daily flow MGD (for the previous 3 years)
12. Is this facility located on Indian country?
❑ Yes ® No
2 of 3 Form -A 1106

NPDES APPLICATION FOR PERMIT RENEWAL - FORM A
For Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) or other treatment systems treating
domestic wastes < 0.1 MGD with no pretreatment program.
13. Effluent Data
Provide data for the parameters listed. Fecal Coliform, Temperature and pH shall be grab samples, for all other
parameters 24-hour composite sampling shall be used. Effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples
and must be no more than four and one half years old.
Parameter
Daily
Maximum
Monthly
Average
Units of
Measurement
Number of
Samples
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
(BOD5)
Fecal Coliform
Total Suspended Solids
Temperature (Summer)
Temperature (Winter)
pH
14. List all permits, construction approvals and/or applications:
Type
Hazardous Waste (RCRA)
UIC (SDWA)
NPDES
PSD (CAA)
Non -attainment program (CAA)
Permit Number
15. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
Type
NESHAPS (CAA)
Ocean Dumping (MPRSA)
Dredge or fill (Section 404 or CWA)
Special Order of Consent (SOC)
Other
Permit Number
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the
best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
L.IU64V1e JI w
Printed name of Person Signing
VA'�:U
'I" t 0
Title
Signature of Applicant Date
11
) � [If( 1 (_
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 (b)(2) states: Any person who knowingly makes any false statement
representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document files or required to be
maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that
Article, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method
required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management
Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed
$25,000, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a
punishment by a fine of not more than $25,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both, for a similar
offense.)
3 of 3 Form -A 1 /06

L
STANLY COUNTY
W te,. {fir-; Laird. Scame,
Stanly County Utilities
Greater Badin Water and Sewer District
NPDES ID NCO074756
Sludge Management Plan
The Greater Badin waste water treatment plant provides treatment of domestic wastewater for
the Greater Badin Water and Sewer District located in Stanly County, North Carolina. The
facility generates between 25 and 30 dry tons of sludge annually. The sludge is dried on site and
hauled to Uwharrie Environmental, a landfill receiving site in Montgomery County, North
Carolina. Sludge is deposited on the Badin wwtp drying beds periodically throughout the year
and hauled to the landfill once or twice per year.
www.stanlycountync.gov
Stanly County Utilities PI 704.986.3686
1000 N. First Street, Suite 12, Albemarle, NC 28001 Fj 704.986.3711

ROY COOPER NORTH CAROLINA
Govvrnor Envfrmmenta! Quality
MICHAEL S- REGAN
Secrete.,
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director
January 08, 2019
Donna L. Davis, Utilities Dir.
Greater Badin Water & Sewer District
1000 N 1st St Ste 12
Albemarle, NC 28001
Subject: Permit Renewal
Application No. NCO074756
Badin WWTP
Stanly County
Dear Applicant:
The Water Quality Permitting Section acknowledges the January 7, 2019 receipt of your permit renewal application and
supporting documentation. Your application will be assigned to a permit writer within the Section's NPDES WW permitting
branch. Per G.S. 150B-3 your current permit does not expire until permit decision on the application is made.
Continuation of the current permit is contingent on timely and sufficient application for renewal of the current permit. The
permit writer will contact you if additional information is required to complete your permit renewal. Please respond in a
timely manner to requests for additional information necessary to allow a complete review of the application and renewal
of the permit.
Information regarding the status of your renewal application can be found online using the Department of Environmental
Quality's Environmental Application Tracker at:
https•//deq nc.ciov/permits-regulations/permit-guidance/environmental-application-tracker
If you have any additional questions about the permit, please contact the primary reviewer of the application using the
links available within the Application Tracker.
sincerely,
Wren Thedford
Administrative Assistant
Water Quality Permitting Section
ec: WQPS Laserfiche File w/application
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919-807-6300

L
STANLY COUNTY
6t/atu� f ir. Land Sacemr
Emily Phillips, Environmental Specialist
NC Dept. of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources
Compliance & Expedited Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Ms. Phillips,
RECEIVED/DENR/DWR
JAN 0 7 2019
Water Resources
Permitting Section
Please find attached the permit renewal application for the Greater Badin Wastewater Treatment
Plant (NPDES ID NC0074756) located in Badin, Stanly County, North Carolina. The Greater
Badin Water and Sewer District, operated by Stanly County Utilities is requesting renewal of the
existing permit. There have been no changes to the facility since issuance of the last permit.
Enclosed with this letter you will find one signed original and two copies of the NPDES from 2A
application and related documentation, one signed original and two copies of this cover letter and
one original and two copies of the sludge management plan for this facility.
Should you have any questions related to this application, please feel free to contact the Stanly
County Utilities Director, Duane Wingo at the address below, by email at
dwin o a,stanlycountync.gov or by phone at [phone]. Thank you for your review of this
request for our permit renewal.
Sincerely,
oz'� �4xoa4'�
Donna Davis
Director
www.stanlycountync.eov
Stanly County Utilities PI 704.986.3686
1000 N. First Street, Suite 12, Albemarle, NC 28001 F1 704.986.3711

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: I PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: I RIVER BASIN:
FORM
2A
NPDES
Greater Badin WWTP, NCO074756
Renewal
NPDES FORM 2A APPLICATION OVERVIEW
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
Yadkin — Pee Dee
Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a "Basic Application Information" packet
and a "Supplemental Application Information" packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 mgd must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application Information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A. Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.8. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
B. Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow >_ 0.1 mgd. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions B.1 through 8.6.
C. Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information.
Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E (Toxicity Testing
Data):
Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (SIUs) or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). SIUs are defined as:
1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions); and
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions), or
b. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
C. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
G. Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G (Combined Sewer
Systems).
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE PART C (CERTIFICATION)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 1 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Greater Badin 1NWTP, NCO074756
Renewal
Yadkin — Pee Dee
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS:
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet
A.I. Facility Information.
Facility Name Greater Badin WWTP
Mailing Address 1000 N. First St. Suite 12
Albemarle NC 28001
Contact Person Earl Almond
Title WWTP Supervisor
Telephone Number [phone]
Facility Address 18 NC 740 Hwy
(not P.O. Box) Badin, NC 28009
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following:
Applicant Name Stanly County Utilities / Greater Badin Water and Sewer District
Mailing Address 1000 N. First St. Suite 12
Albemarle NC 28001
Contact Person Duane winoo
Title Utilities Director
Telephone Number [phone]
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
® owner ® operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
❑ facility ® applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state -issued permits).
NPDES NCO074756 PSD
UIC Other
RCRA Other
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
Name Population Served Type of Collection System Ownership
Badin NC 28009 1550 Separate sanitary sewer
Total population served
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 2 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Greater Badin WWTP, NC0074756 Renewal Yadkin — Pee Dee
A.5. Indian Country.
a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
_ Yes ® No
b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian Country?
1 Yes [ No
A.6. Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12-month time period
with the 12t' month of "this year' occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
a. Design flow rate 0.550 mgd
Two Years Ago Last Year This Year
b. Annual average daily flow rate 0.473 mqd 0.340 mqd 0.289 mqd
C. Maximum daily flow rate 3.011 mqd 2.496 mqd 1.449 mgd
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the type(s) of collection system(s) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution (by miles) of each.
[' Separate sanitary sewer 100 %
Combined storm and sanitary sewer %
A.8. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.? E] Yes j] No
If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
i. Discharges of treated effluent
ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent
iii. Combined sewer overflow points
iv. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks)
V. Other
b. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? Yes
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location:
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s)
Is discharge [ 1 continuous or intermittent?
c. Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater?
If yes, provide the following for each land application site:
Location:
1
0
0
0
No
_
mgd
Yes
No
Number of acres:
Annual average daily volume applied to site: mgd
Is land application continuous or intermittent?
d. Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works? Yes
No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 3 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Greater Badin WWTP, NCO074756 Renewal Yadkin — Pee Dee
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
If you answered "Yes" to question A.8.a, complete questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outfall (including bypass points) through
which effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. If you answered "No" to question
A.8.a, go to Part B, "Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 mgd."
A.9. Description of Outfall.
a. Ouffall number
b. Location
(City or town, if applicable)
(Zip Code)
Stanly
NC
(County)
(State)
35d 23m 55s N
80d 07m 20s W
(Latitude)
(Longitude)
C. Distance from shore (if applicable) N/A
ft.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) N/A
ft.
e. Average daily flow rate 0.289
mgd
f. Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge? ❑ Yes
® No (go to A.9.g.)
If yes, provide the following information:
Number f times per year discharge occurs:
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge:
mgd
Months in which discharge occurs:
g. Is ouffall equipped with a diffuser? ❑ Yes
® No
A.10. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water Little Mountain Creek into Mountain Creek into Pee Dee River
b. Name of watershed (if known)
United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
C. Name of State Management/River Basin (if known):
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known): _
d. Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable)
acute cfs chronic cfs
e. Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable): mg/I of CaCO3
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 5 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Greater Badin VWVfP, NCO074756
Renewal
Yadkin — Pee Dee
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
__i Primary ❑ Secondary
l Advanced ❑ Other. Describe:
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal or Design CBOD5 removal %
Design SS removal 85 %
Design P removal %
Design N removal %
Other %
C. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:
Chlorination
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlorination used for this outfall? ® Yes ❑ No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration? Yes ❑ No
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart.
Outfall number:
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
AVERAGE DAILY VALUE
PARAMETER
Value
Units
Value
Units
Number of Samples
pH (Minimum)
6.9
S.U.
pH (Maximum)
7.1
S.U.
Flow Rate
1.240
mgd
0.407
m d
31
Temperature (Winter)
16.0
C
13.28
C
20
Temperature (Summer)
26.2
C
25.5
C
22
* For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value
MAXIMUM DAILY
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
POLLUTANT
METHOD
MUMDL
--
Conc. j
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
BOD5
2.4
m /L
0.171
m /L
14
SM5210B
2.0
DEMAND (Report one)
CBOD5
FECAL COLIFORM
6000
#/100mL
3.429
#/100mL
14
SM9222D
1
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
11
m /L
5.45
m /L
14
SM2540D
1
END OF PART A.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 6 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Greater Badin WVVfP NCO074756
Renewal
Yadkin — Pee Dee
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART B. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DESIGN FLOW GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD (100,000 gallons per day).
All applicants with a design flow rate >_ 0.1 mgd must answer questions B.1 through B.6. All others go to Part C (Certification).
B.1. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
120,000 gpd
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.)
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping, if applicable.
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within Y, mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed.
f. If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed.
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
backup power sources or redunancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g.,
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram.
8.4. Operation/Maintenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? - Yes fi] No
If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractor's responsibilities (attach additional
pages if necessary).
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: j 1
Responsibilities of Contractor:
B.5. Scheduled improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements, submit separate responses to question 13.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a. List the outfall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule-
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies.
Yes No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 7 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Greater Badin WWTP, NCO074756
Renewal
Yadkin — Pee Dee
C. If the answer to B.5.b is "Yes," briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable).
d. Provide dates imposed by any compliance schedule or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed below, as
applicable. For improvements planned independently of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion dates, as
applicable. Indicate dates as accurately as possible.
Schedule Actual Completion
Implementation Stage MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY
Begin Construction
End Construction / / / /
Begin Discharge
Attain Operational Level
e. Have appropriate permits/clearances concerning other Federal/State requirements been obtained? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Describe briefly:
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD ONLY).
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide the indicated
effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is discharged. Do not include information
on combine sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing data must be
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be no more than four and on -half years old.
Outfall Number: 00`
MAXIMUM DAILY
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
POLLUTANT
METHODSamples
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
0.280
mg/L
0.085
mg/L
14
EPA350.1
0.04
CHLORINE (TOTAL
36
µg/L
16.4
µg/L
14
HACH 8167
10
RESIDUAL, TRC)
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
7.9
mg/L
7.55
mg/L
14
SM45000G
0.1
TOTAL KJELDAHL
NITROGEN (TKN)
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
NITROGEN
OIL and GREASE
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
8.91
mg/L
3.62
mgiL
3
EPA365.4
0.04
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
(TDS)
TOTAL CYANIDE
FLUORIDE
END OF PART B.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99) Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 8 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Greater Badin WWTP, NCO074756
Renewal
Yadkin — Pee Dee
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART C. CERTIFICATION
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained in the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
® Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
❑ Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
❑ Part E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data)
❑ Part F (Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
❑ Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION.
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
for knowing violations.
Name and official title Donna L Davis Utilities Director
Signature /N11-11— yLtAZ:11,42
Telephone number [phone]
Date signed December 3, 2018
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDENR/ DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 9 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART D. EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DATA
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd or it has (or is required
to have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the following
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which
effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided below
any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant
scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
Outfall number: (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MUMDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE, PHENOLS, AND HARDNESS.
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
TOTAL PHENOLIC
COMPOUNDS
HARDNESS (as CaCO3)
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other metals requested by the permit writer
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 10 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Outfall number: (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
Of
Samples
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONITRILE
BENZENE
BROMOFORM
CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLORODIBROMO-
METHANE
CHLOROETHANE
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL
ETHER
CHLOROFORM
DICHLOROBROMO-
METHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRANS-I,2-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
1,3-DICHLORO-
PROPYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYL BROMIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1,1, 2, 2-TETRA-
CHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLORO-
ETHYLENE
TOLUENE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 11 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Outfall number: (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MUMDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1,2-
TRICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other volatile organic compounds requested by the permit writer
ACID -EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
4,6-DIN ITRO-O-CRESOL
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
2,4,6-
TRICHLOROPHENOL
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other acid -extractable compounds requested by the permit writer
BASE -NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ACENAPHTHENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
BENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(A)PYRENE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 12 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Outfall number: (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.
e ( P 9 9 )
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLIMDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
3,4 BENZO-
FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
BENZO(K)
FLUORANTHENE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)-
ETHER
BIS (2-CHLOROISO-
PROPYL)ETHER
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE
4-BROMOPHENYL
PHENYLETHER
BUTYL BENZYL
PHTHALATE
2-CHLORO-
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLORPHENYL
PHENYLETHER
CHRYSENE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
DIBENZO(A,H)
ANTHRACENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
3,3-DICHLORO-
BENZIDINE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
112-DIPHENYL-
HYDRAZINE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 13 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Outfall number: (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MUMDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-
BUTADIENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-
PENTADIENE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
INDENO(1,2,3-CD)
PYRENE
ISOPHORONE
NAPHTHALENE
NITROBENZENE
N-NITROSODI-N-
PROPYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
METHYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
PHENYLAMINE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
1,2,4-
TRICHLOROBENZENE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other base -neutral compounds requested by the permit writer
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other pollutants (e.g., pesticides) requested by the permit writer
END OF PART D.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 14 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Greater Badin WWTP, NCO074756
Renewal
Yadkin — Pee Dee
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd, 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403), or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question EA for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.I. Required Tests.
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
chronic acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half years. Allow one
column per test (where each species constitutes a test). Copy this page if more than three tests are being reported.
Test number: 18
Test number: Test number:
a. Test information.
Test Species & test method number
Age at initiation of test
Outfall number
Dates sample collected
Date test started
Duration
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title
Edition number and year of publication
Page number(s)
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 15 of 22

After dechlorination
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 16 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Greater Badin WWTP, NCO074756
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin — Pee Dee
Test number: Test number: Test number:
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type: if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural' or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Salinity
Temperature
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
LC5o
95% C.I.
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 17 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Greater Badin WWTP, NCO074756
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin — Pee Dee
Chronic:
NOEC
%
%
%
IC25
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DD/YYYY)?
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe:
EA. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted:
END OF PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: I RIVER BASIN:
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
❑ Yes ' No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs.
b. Number of CIUs.
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name:
Mailing Address:
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s):
Raw material(s):
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd (_ continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd (_ continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
Yes No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ❑ No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
_I Truck [ I Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REM EDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been noted that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ❑ No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous .j Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 20 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
I SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART G. COMBINED SEWER SYSTEMS
If the treatment works has a combined sewer system, complete Part G.
GA. System Map. Provide a map indicating the following: (may be included with Basic Application Information)
a. All CSO discharge points.
b. Sensitive use areas potentially affected by CSOs (e.g., beaches, drinking water supplies, shellfish beds, sensitive aquatic ecosystems, and
outstanding natural resource waters).
C. Waters that support threatened and endangered species potentially affected by CSOs.
G.2. System Diagram. Provide a diagram, either in the map provided in GA or on a separate drawing, of the combined sewer collection system that
includes the following information.
a. Location of major sewer trunk lines, both combined and separate sanitary.
b. Locations of points where separate sanitary sewers feed into the combined sewer system.
C. Locations of in -line and off-line storage structures.
d. Locations of flow -regulating devices.
e. Locations of pump stations.
CSO OUTFALLS: M i
Complete questions G.3 through G.6 once for each CSO discharge point.
G.3. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number
b. Location
(City or town, if applicable) (Zip Code)
(County) (State)
(Latitude) (Longitude)
C. Distance from shore (if applicable) ft.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) ft.
e. Which of the following were monitored during the last year for this CSO?
❑ Rainfall ❑ CSO pollutant concentrations ] CSO frequency
❑ CSO flow volume ❑ Receiving water quality
f. How many storm events were monitored during the last year?
G.4. CSO Events.
a. Give the number of CSO events in the last year.
events ( I actual or!- approx.)
b. Give the average duration per CSO event.
hours (❑ actual or ❑ approx.)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 21 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: I PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: I RIVER BASIN:
C. Give the average volume per CSO event.
million gallons (❑ actual or ❑ approx.)
d. Give the minimum rainfall that caused a CSO event in the last year
Inches of rainfall
G.5. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water:
b. Name of watershed/river/stream system:
United State Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
C. Name of State Management/River Basin:
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
G.6. CSO Operations.
Describe any known water quality impacts on the receiving water caused by this CSO (e.g., permanent or intermittent beach closings, permanent or
intermittent shell fish bed closings, fish kills, fish advisories, other recreational loss, or violation of any applicable State water quality standard).
END OF PART G.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 22 of 22

Additional information, if provided, will appear on the following pages.
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

L
STANLY COUNTY
'law su66"rs,
Stanly County Utilities
Greater Badin Water and Sewer District
NPDES ID NCO074756
Sludge Management Plan
The Greater Badin waste water treatment plant provides treatment of domestic wastewater for
the Greater Badin Water and Sewer District located in Stanly County, North Carolina. The
facility generates between 25 and 30 dry tons of sludge annually. The sludge is dried on site and
hauled to Uwharrie Environmental, a landfill receiving site in Montgomery County, North
Carolina. Sludge is deposited on the Badin wwtp drying beds periodically throughout the year
and hauled to the landfill once or twice per year.
www.stanlycountync.gov
Stanly County Utilities 111704.986.3686
1000 N. First Street, Suite 12, Albemarle, NC 28001 1`1 704.986.3711

l
T�� /•GR
16" INFLUENT -�
I INFLL
PUMF
STA?
CONTROL
BUILDING
UIVCJ 1 GR
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT FIG. I.3-I