19961148 Ver 1_Complete File_19961220

J6 Q t•.
•
r:

#••i `i:?i'•;ij'F E; #i;#:E: ii" -•' ,E: {!E! #i?;? .i?;

: r.• i/

:=`=' ^:.

i
?
)w 3E

co
;
s -o

i

WAKEFIELD PLANTATION
WETLANDS IMPACT TABLE
NATIONWIDE PERMIT 26 SUMMARY
Total acres of waters lost to road construction: 0.1352
Total acres of waters lost to sewer construction: -0-
Total acres of waters lost to site activity: 0.1582
Total acres of waters of the United States lost: 0.1582
Total linear feet of waters filled: 481 ft.
1
NATIONWIDE PERMIT 14 SUMMARY
Crossing 1
Total acres of fill in waters of the United States: 0.0180 ac. i
Total linear feet of fill special aquatic sites: 4.9 ft. i
Crossing 2
Total acres of fill in waters of the United States: 0.0043 ac.
Total linear feet of fill special aquatic sites: 3.0 ft.
Crossing 3
Total acres of fill in waters of the United States: 0.0950 ac.
Total linear feet of fill special aquatic sites: 5.2 ft.
Crossing _4
Total acres of fill in waters of the United States: -0-
Total linear feet of fill special aquatic sites: -0- 1.."
RA-Fi6F-%CAg\WAKEFZDt UWLta2

Crossing 5
Total acres of fill in waters of the United States: -0-
Total linear feet of fill special aquatic sites: -0-
Crossing 6
Total acres of fill in waters of the United States: -0-
Total' linear feet of fill special aquatic sites: -0-
Crossing 7
Total acres of fill in waters of the United States: -0-
Total linear feet of fill special aquatic sites: -0-
Crossing_ 8
Total acres of fill in waters of the United States: 0.0060 ac.
Total linear feet of fill special aquatic sites: 52 ft.
Crossing
Total acres of fill in waters of the United States: 0.0046 ac.
Total linear feet of fill special aquatic sites: 3.0 ft.
Crossing 10
Total acres of fill in waters of the United States: 0.0073 ac.
Total linear feet of fill special aquatic sites: 5.0 ft.
RA•EAX-fir- %WAKEFLD%RESIDLTH2
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
NC ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 24, 1998
Wake County
DWQ Project # 961148
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS, WRP
Mr. Billy Sutton
Wakefield Developers
12492 Falls of the Neuse Road
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Dear Mr. Sutton:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
material in an additional 700 linear feet of stream impact (total stream impact requiring mitigation is now 927 feet)
for the purpose of a residential and commercial development in Wake County, as you described in your application
dated August 31, 1998. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water
Quality Certification Numbers 3102 and 3108. These certifications allow you to use Nationwide Permit Numbers
13 and 26 when the Corps of Engineers issues them. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local
permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal
Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire when the
accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification. All other
conditions in previous Certifications are still applicable. The non-commercial portion of this project has vested
rights with respect to the Neuse River buffer rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) and retains them with this approval.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as
modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new
application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification
and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this
project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC
2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and
any additional conditions listed below.
1. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining jurisdictional
wetlands and waters to notify the state in order to assure compliance for future wetland and/or water
impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of this letter or the issuance of
the 404 Permit (whichever is later).
We understand that you have chosen to contribute to the Wetland Restoration Program in order to compensate
for these impacts to wetlands and/or streams. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2R .0500, this contribution will
satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 211.0506(h). According to 15A NCAC 2H
.0506(h), feet of restoration will be required. Until the Wetland Restoration Program receives and clears your check
(made payable to: DEHNR - Wetland Restoration Program), wetland or stream fill shall not occur. Mr. Ron Ferrell
should be contacted at 919-733-5083 ext. 358 if you have any questions concerning the Wetland Restoration
Program. You have one month from the date of this Certification to make this payment. For accounting purposes,
this Certification authorizes the fill of 927 feet of streams, in 030402 river and subbasin and 927 feet of
stream restoration are required. Please be aware that the Wetland Restoration Program (WRP) rules
require rounding of acreage amounts to one-quarter acre increments (15A 2R.0503(b)).
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition
which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
Division of Water Quality • Environmental Sciences Branch
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorsey at 919-733-1786.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Mr. John Domey
Central Files
Ron Ferrell; Wetland Restoration Program
Kevin Martin; S & E C
F Sin rel
ton r. E.
961148.1tr

NORTH CAROLINA - DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, Wakefield Development Company has permission as outlined below for the
purpose(s) of proposed constructing additional road crossings. All activities associated with these authorized impacts must be
conducted in accordance with the conditions listed in the attached certification transmittal letter. THIS CERTIFICATION IS
NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT FOR WETLAND RESTORATION
LOCATION: Wakefield Subdivision
COUNTY: Wake
BASIN/SUBBASIN: 030402
As required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506, and the conditions of this certification, you are required to compensate for the above
impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands and surface waters as outlined below prior to
conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the state.
Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Wetland Restoration Programs must be rounded to
one-quarter acre increments according to 15A 2R .0503(b)
acres of Class WL wetlands
acres of riparian wetlands
acres of non-riparian wetlands
acres of Class SWL wetlands
927 linear feet of stream channel
(other)
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through the payment of a fee
to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per 15A NCAC 2R .0503. If you choose this option, please sign this form and mail it to the
Wetlands Restoration Fund at the address listed below. An invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you
upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE
NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM.
Signature Date
WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
P.O. BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NC 27626-0535
[phone] ext. 358
L- ] ?

TM
E
VIE
3)
5hy M L)i
J^
??C
,401 (SLED
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
244 West Millbrook Road ¦ Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 ¦ [phone] ¦ Fax [phone]
August 31, 1998
Job #97-3037
NCDEH & NR - DWQ US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr. John Dorney Attn: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
4401 Reedy Creek Road 6508 Falls of the Neuse Ro ite 120
Raleigh, NC 27607 Raleigh, NC 27615 Q
,, god
Re: Nationwide Permits 26 and 13 Wakefield Residential Tra
S6 -P
Dear Mr. Dorney and Mr. Alsmeyer: 3 X998
The purpose of this letter is to request the authorization of Nationwide
26 for 0.129 acres and NW 13 for 205'. The project is located in Wake County
north of the Neuse River, west of Highway 1 and east of Falls of the Neuse Road
near Wake Forest, NC (see Site Vicinity Map).
All impacts will result from the fill of jurisdictional waters for roads for the
development (see Site Plan). Impacts A, B, & C are at the same location as in the
previously submitted site plan by BKA. However, BKA did not request impacts
,at these locations for some unknown reason. Impacts DE & F are additional
crossings that have been required by the City of Raleigh and were not on the
site plan originally. We believe the previous consultant intended to utilize
bottomless culverts in order to avoid requiring permits. However, for reasons
spelled out in the attached City of Raleigh letter they would prefer that "normal"
culvert crossings be utilized. Based on an office meeting with John Dorney &
Preston Howard, it seems that these crossings can be- permitted without V ,w
jeopardizing Wakefield's Neuse Basin Buffer vesting.
A table showing previous project impacts to jurisdictional areas, current
proposed impacts as revised and resultant totals is enclosed. Wetland acreage
impacts as proposed are below the DWQ 1 acre mitigation threshold. Potential
stream mitigation that may be required due to the proposed impacts will need to
be determined during site visits. If required, our clients plan to mitigate is to
pay into the state WRP fund.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Ke in C. Martin
KCM/ sh
Note: Agent authorization letters were previously submitted to the Corps and
DWQ for this project.
Soil/Site Evaluation ¦ Mapping and Physical Analysis ¦ Wetlands Mapping and Mitigation ¦ Environmental Audits
On-Site Waste Treatment Systems, Evaluation and Design
Wakefield Residential Wetland Impacts Currently Requested
NW 13 NW 14 NW12 NW 26
0.03 acres 0 0 0.129
205 linear ft. (ft. sig. Channel
unknown)
Previous Wakefield Impacts A roved b Corps**)
0.02 0.26 0.58 0.767
Linear ft.? Total Width (75' sig. Channel)
110'
Wakefield Project Totals if Commercial Permitted As Revised
0.05 0.26 0.58 0.896
205+ linear ft.? Total Width (ft. sig. Channel
110' unknown)
Note: Impacts shown on the enclosed map and table fall under Nationwide
Permits 26 & 13.
Site visits by DWQ and the Corps will be required to determine if stream
impacts are to "significant' streams. If so, and mitigation is required, the
client' s "plan to mitigate" is to pay into the state WRP program.
** DWQ 401 is still pending for commercial impacts previously approved by
Corps.
DWQ ID: Corps Action ID: See Item 8a
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit ft 13 & 26
Pre-Construction Notification Application
For Nationwide Permits that Require:
1) Notification to the Corps of Engineers
2) Application for Section 401 Certification
3) Coordination with the NC Division of Coastal Management
Send the original and (1) copy of this completed form to the appropriate field office of
the Corps of Engineers (see agency addresses sheet). Seven (7) copies should be sent to
the NC Division of Environmental Management (see agency addresses sheet). PLEASE
PRINT.
1. Owner's Name: Wakefield Developers - Attn: Billy Sutton
2.
Subdivision Name: Wakefield
City: Wake Forest State: NC Zip Code: 27587
Project location address, including subdivision name (if different from mailing address
above): see attached vicinity map
3) Telephone Number (Home):
(Work): 919-556-4310
4) If applicable, agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone
number:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Phone: [phone]
244 West Millbrook Road
Fax: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27609
5. Location of work (provide a map, preferable a copy of USGS topographic map or
aerial photograph with scale):
Mailing Address: 12492 Falls of Neuse Road
County: Wake Nearest town or city: Wake Forest
Specific Location (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
West of Highway 1 and south of Highway 98 (see attached USGS Quad
vicinity map)
6. Impacted or nearest stream/river: unnamed tributaries of Richland Creek
River Basin: Neuse
7a. Is project located near water classified as trout, tidal saltwater (SA), high quality
waters (HQW), outstanding resource waters (ORW), water supply (WS-I or WS-
II)? YES F] NO If yes, explain:
7b. If the project is located within a North Carolina division of coastal management
area of environmental concern (AEC)? YES ? NO
7c.
If the project is located within a coastal county (see page 7 for list of coastal
counties), what is the land use plan (LUP) designation?
8a. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property?
YES ® NO ? If yes, provide Action ID number of pervious permit and
any additional information (including photocopy of 401 certification).
#199602047, #199708091,#199708092, #199708093
8b. Are additional permit requests expected for this property in the future?
YES ? NO E] If yes, describe anticipated work:
do not know at this time
9a. Estimated total number of acres in tract of land: 1,900 total project of which 1400
acres within residential tract
9b. Estimated total number or acres of wetlands located on project site: >50
10a. Number of acres of wetlands impacted by the proposed project by:
Filling: 0.129(26), 0.03(13) Excavation:
Flooding:
Other:
Drainage: Total acres to be impacted: 0.129(26) &
0.03(13)
10b. (1) Stream channel to be impacted by the proposed project (if relocated,
provide distance both before and after relocation):
Length before: 1065'
Width Before (based on normal high water contours):
Width After:
Average depth before:
After:
After:
(2) Stream channel impacts will result from: (check all that apply)
Open channel relocation: ? Placement of pipe in channel: ® 860'
Channel Excavation: ? Construction of a Dam/ Flooding: ?
Other: stream bank stabilization with rip rap (205')
11. If construction of a pond is proposed, what is the size of the watershed draining to
the pond?
What is the expected pond surface area?
12. Description of proposed work including discussion of type of mechanical
equipment to be used (attach plans 81/2" x 11" drawings only):
construction of roads for a residential & commercial development
13. Purpose of proposed work: development of residential & commercial property on
uplands
14. State reasons why it is believed that this activity must be carried out in wetlands
(include any measures taken to minimize wetland impacts):
To gain access to "high" ground. See S&EC letter attached.
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) (see agency addresses sheet) regarding
the presence of any federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or
threatened species or critical habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the
proposed project. Date contacted: (attach responses from these agencies).
handled by USACOE
16. You are required to contact the state historic preservation officer (SHPO) (see
agency address sheet) regarding the presence of historic properties in the permit
area which may be affected by the proposed project Date contacted:
handled by USACOE
17. Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (state)
land?
YES ? NO ® If no, go to 18.
a. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document
pursuant to the requirements of the North Carolina Environmental Policy
Act?
YES ? NO ?
b. If yes, has the document been reviewed through the North Carolina
Department of Administration State Clearinghouse?
YES ? NO ?
If answers to 17b is YES, then submit appropriate documentation from the state
clearinghouse to division of environmental management regarding compliance
with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
Questions regarding the State Clearinghouse review process should be directed to
Ms. Chrys Baggett, Director State Clearinghouse, North Carolina Department of
Administration, 116 West Jones Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-8003,
telephone [phone].
18. The following items should be included with this application if proposed activity
involves the discharge of excavated or fill material into wetlands:
a. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, lakes and ponds on
the property (for Nationwide Permit numbers 14, 18, 21, 26, 29 and 38). All
streams (intermittent and permanent) on the property must be shown on the
map. Map scales should be 1 inch equals 50 feet or 1 inch equals 100 feet or
their equivalent.
b. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant
to the placement of the delineation line.
d. Attach a copy of the stormwater management plan, if required.
e. What is land used of surrounding property? residential, commercial or
undeveloped
f. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal?
municipal
g. Signed and dated agent authorization letter, if applicable.
NOTE: Wetlands or Waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to:
1. Issuance of a Section 404 Corps of Engineers Permit,
2. Either the issuance or waiver of a 401 Division of Environmental
Management (Water Quality) certification, and
3. (in the twenty coastal counties only) A letter from the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management stating the proposed activity is consistent
with the North Carolina oastal Management program.
q- L ?--: ? ?; > R/?(
Owner's ent's ignature Date
(Agentis signature valid only if Agent Authorization Letter from the owner is provided
(18 g•))
WAKEFIELD WETLAND ROAD IMPACTS
cc

sm ? w„?,T R.MC ,. .n?saws, aa? : $
f ? ? g )5
tl
9 WETLAND IMPACTS WAKEFIELD 8-98 SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, Inc. S&EC JOB X13037
g 244 NW Mlblo Ro URo 10. Noah C-" 210ME(Yt% 5W5W0
WAKEFIELD ROADS WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
( NW26 )
IMPACT WIDTH LENGTH AREA LOCATION
A 7ft 220ft 1540 FT2 WAKEFIELD
PLANTATION BLVD
BY GOLF HOLE 7
B 7ft 160ft 1120 ft2 WAKEFIELD
PLANTATION BLVD
BY GOLF HOLE 16
C 7ft 170ft 1190 ft2 WAKEFIELD
PLANTATION BLVD
BY GOLF HOLE 4
D 5ft 100ft 500 ft2 UNNAMMED
STREET BELOW
GOLF HOLE 17
E 7ft 100ft 700 ft2 PROPOSED STREET
BELOW GOLF HOLE
4
F 5ft 110ft 550 ft2 KELWAY DRIVE
i
I I I BELOW YMCA
TOTAL AREA 5600 ft2 = 0.129ac
WAKEFIELD CHANNEL STABILAZATION TABLE
NW13
AREA LENGTH
A 40ft
B 30ft
c 40ft
D 35ft
E 30ft
F 30ft

MN
GN
124 MILS 1.26'
25.11S
UTM GRID AND 1987 MAGNETIC NORTH
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
1 !5 ;ALE 1:24000
1 0 1 MILE
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET
1 .5 0 1 KILOMETER
CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929
WAKE FOREST QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA-WAKE CO.
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
NE/4 RALEIGH 15' QUADRANGLE
/I L./- %---
T i MD
May 27, 1998
60ity Of 6Raleigh
North earolina
Mr. Ted L. Bartelt, PE
Alpha & Omega Group, PC
3100 Spring Forest Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, N. C. 27616
Reference: Culvert at Sta. 59=00, Plantation Blvd. - Wakefield Subdivision
Dear Mr. Bartelt:
The purpose of this document is to respond to your request for the City to accept the use
of a corrugated steel plate arch culvert at the above referenced site. You have indicated
your kaQwledge that the City does not accent metal pipe construction however yo 've
also indicated there are circumstances warranting special considers ion.
Wetland issues seem to be the driving force for most of the case. Your follow up letter of
5-7-98 responds to issues discussed at our 4-27-98 meeting. As I understand the
situation, this crossing was not submitted to the Corps of Engineers as a site where
wetlands would be filled. The developer has two choices. He can now obtain a wetlands
permit or build the road without filling wetlands, After pursuing this, it has been
determined by the Attomey General that the "residential" portion of the Wakefield
Subdivision is grandfathered from the Neuse Basin Buffer Rules. Further, State DWO
has indicated Wakefield would lose their grandfathering if additional wetland permits are
re__ juuired. Since a standard reinforced concrete box culvert would require filling wetlands.
alternative designs have been considered.
State DWQ's interpretation of zero disturbances has resulted in the proposal to utilize a
bottomless arch culvert design. The City has
involves the appropriate
design since part o
two major concerns. The first
crossing will be on rock while
some will be on soil. You have indicated this will be addressed in the final design if the
conceptual design is approved.
OFFICES • 222 'NEST HARGETT STREET • POST 0i-'Cfi SOX 590 • RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602
T P '. Kin I i nc 7-1 T a n I 1?h ? lH?J 'R q?!qW T M i,jn I-1 bQ : RP RFC T-R T-qnH
Mr. Ted L. Bartelt, PE
May 27, 1998
Page 2
The second concern is the fact that the ipe arch will become unusuable or fail faster than
a reinforced concrete structure. Consultation with one of State D7 most
expcrienced metal pipe engineers confirms our belief that a metal i e used under this
scenario will last about half as long as a reinforced concrete box culvert.
Based on the above, Z can recommend acceptance of your proposal provided the owner is
willies to Provide adequate funds to the City for replacement of the pine arch based on a
.
life expectancy of 40 ears vs. that of a concrete structure being in the 75 to 100 year
range.
Please advise acceptance of this condition and we can work out details at a later date.
Needless to say, putting the City in such an awkward position as this has caused quite a
bit of ?ncem. It should be noted that obtaining a wetlands _permit without first asstrrini
that the construction option meets Czty standards in the future will not be considered.
Sinc
Stelraq. Sykes, PP-
City I? sneer
cc: City Manager Benton
Stormwater Services Manager Bowden
FR 'r-i Nn tins 111I S 01 -18N]nbH i '8 S6BHl I M W08--J vs : 88 8662-8i-9nu
401 ISSOF-D
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
244 West Millbrook Road ¦ Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 ¦ [phone] ¦ Fax [phone]
NCDEH & NR - DWQ
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Re:
August 31, 1998
Job #97-3037
US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
Nationwide Permits 26 and 13 Wakefield Residential
Dear Mr. Dorney and Mr. Alsmeyer:
The purpose of this letter is to request the authorization ofW&UJL 1R_Wj*N
26 for 0.129 acres and NW 13 for 205'. The project is located in Wake County
north of the Neuse River, west of Highway 1 and east of Falls of the Neuse Road
near Wake Forest, NC (see Site Vicini Map).
All impacts will result from the fill of jurisdictional waters for roads for the
development (see Site Plan . Impacts A, B, & C are at the same location as in the
previously submitted site plan by BKA. However, BKA did not request impacts
at these locations for some unknown reason. Impacts D,E & F are additional
crossings that have been required by the City of Raleigh and were not on the
site plan originally. We believe the previous consultant intended to utilize
bottomless culverts in order to avoid requiring permits. However, for reasons
spelled out in the attached City of Raleigh letter they would prefer that "normal"
culvert crossings be utilized. Based on an office meeting with John Dorney &
Preston Howard, it seems that these crossings can be permitted without
jeopardizing Wakefield's Neuse Basin Buffer vesting.
A table showing previous project impacts to jurisdictional areas, current
proposed impacts as revised and resultant totals is enclosed. Wetland acreage
impacts as proposed are below the DWQ 1 acre mitigation threshold. Potential
stream mitigation that may be required, due to the proposed impacts will need to
be determined during site visits. If required, our clients plan to mitigate is to
pay into the state WRP fund.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Ke in C. Martin
KCM/sh
Note: Agent authorization letters were previously submitted to the Corps and
DWQ for this project.
Soil/Site Evaluation ¦ Mapping and Physical Analysis ¦ Wetlands Mapping and Mitigation ¦ Environmental Audits
On-Site Waste Treatment Systems, Evaluation and Design
Wakefield Residential Wetland Impacts Currently Requested
NW 13 NW 14 NW12 NW 26
0.03 acres 0 0 0.129
205 linear ft. (ft. sig. Channel
unknown)
PrPvinus Wakefield Impacts (Approved by Corps**)
0.02 0.26 0.58 0.767
Linear ft.? Total Width
1: (75' sig. Channel)
110'
Wakefield Proiect Totals if Commercial Permitted As Revised
0.05 0.26 0.58 0.896
205+ linear ft.? Total Width (ft. sig. Channel
110' unknown)
Note: Impacts shown on the enclosed map and table fall under Nationwide
Permits 26 & 13.
* Site visits by DWQ and the Corps will be required to determine if stream
impacts are to "significant" streams. If so, and mitigation is required, the
client's "plan to mitigate" is to pay into the state WRP program.
** DWQ 401 is still pending for commercial impacts previously approved by
Corps.
DWQ ID:
Corps Action ID:
See Item 8a
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit ft 13 & 26
Pre-Construction Notification Application
For Nationwide Permits that Require:
1) Notification to the Corps of Engineers
2) Application for Section 401 Certification
3) Coordination with the NC Division of Coastal Management
Send the original and (1) copy of this completed form to the appropriate field office of
the Corps of Engineers (see agency addresses sheet). Seven (7) copies should be sent to
the NC Division of Environmental Management (see agency addresses sheet). PLEASE
PRINT.
1. Owner's Name: Wakefield Developers - Attn: Billy Sutton
2. Mailing Address: 12492 Falls of Neuse Road
Subdivision Name: Wakefield
City: Wake Forest State: NC Zip Code: 27587
Project location address, including subdivision name (if different from mailing address
above): see attached vicini , map
3) Telephone Number (Home):
(Work): 919-556-4310
4) If applicable, agenfs name or responsible corporate official, address, phone
number:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Phone: [phone]
244 West Millbrook Road Fax: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27609
5. Location of work (provide a map, preferable a copy of USGS topographic map or
aerial photograph with scale):
County: Wake Nearest town or city: Wake Forest
Specific Location (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
West of Highway 1 and south of Highway 98 (see attached USGS Quad
vicinity map)
6. Impacted or nearest stream/river: unnamed tributaries of Richland Creek
River Basin: Netise
7a. Is project located near water classified as trout, tidal saltwater (SA), high quality
waters (HQW), outstanding resource waters (ORW), water supply (WS-I or WS-
II)? YES E] NO ® If yes, explain:
7b. If the project is located within a North Carolina division of coastal management
area of environmental concern (AEC)? YES ? NO
7c.
If the project is located within a coastal county (see page 7 for list of coastal
counties), what is the land use plan (LUP) designation?
8a. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property?
YES ® NO ? If yes, provide Action ID number of pervious permit and
any additional information (including photocopy of 401 certification).
#199602047,#199708091,#199708092/#199708093
8b. Are additional permit requests expected for this property in the future?
YES ? NO ? If yes, describe anticipated work:
do not know at this time
9a. Estimated total number of acres in tract of land: 1,900 total project of which 1400
acres within residential tract
9b. Estimated total number or acres of wetlands located on project site: >50
10a. Number of acres of wetlands impacted by the proposed project by:
Filling: 0.129(26), 0.03(13) Excavation:
Flooding:
Drainage:
Other:
Total acres to be impacted: 0.129(26) &
0.03(13)
10b. (1) Stream channel to be impacted by the proposed project (if relocated,
provide distance both before and after relocation):
Length before: 1065'
Width After:
Width Before (based on normal high water contours):
Open channel relocation: ? Placement of pipe in channel: ® 860'
Channel Excavation: ? Construction of a Dam/Flooding: ?
Other: stream bank stabilization with rip rap (205')
11. If construction of a pond is proposed, what is the size of the watershed draining to
the pond?
12.
Average depth before:
After:
After:
(2) Stream channel impacts will result from: (check all that apply)
What is the expected pond surface area?
Description of proposed work including discussion of type of mechanical
equipment to be used (attach plans 81/2" x 11" drawings only):
construction of roads for a residential & commercial development
13. Purpose of proposed work: development of residential & commercial property on
uplands
14. State reasons why it is believed that this activity must be carried out in wetlands
(include any measures taken to minimize wetland impacts):
To gain access to "high" ground. See S&EC letter attached.
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) (see agency addresses sheet) regarding
the presence of any federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or
threatened species or critical habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the
proposed project. Date contacted: (attach responses from these agencies).
handled by USACOE
16. You are required to contact the state historic preservation officer (SHPO) (see
agency address sheet) regarding the presence of historic properties in the permit
area which may be affected by the proposed project. Date contacted:
handled by USACOE
17. Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (state)
land?
YES ? NO ® If no, go to 18.
a. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document
pursuant to the requirements of the North Carolina Environmental Policy
Act?
YES ? NO ?
b. If yes, has the document been reviewed through the North Carolina
Department of Administration State Clearinghouse?
YES ? NO ?
If answers to 17b is YES, then submit appropriate documentation from the state
clearinghouse to division of environmental management regarding compliance
with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Questions regarding the State Clearinghouse review process should be directed to
Ms. Chrys Baggett, Director,State Clearinghouse, North Carolina Department of
Administration, 116 West Jones Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-8003,
telephone [phone].
18. The following items should be included with this application if proposed activity
involves the discharge of excavated or fill material into wetlands:
a. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, lakes and ponds on
the property (for Nationwide Permit numbers 14, 18, 21, 26, 29 and 38). All
streams (intermittent and permanent) on the property must be shown on the
map. Map scales should be 1 inch equals 50 feet or 1 inch equals 100 feet or
their equivalent
b. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant
to the placement of the delineation line.
d. Attach a copy of the stormwater management plan, if required.
e. What is land used of surrounding property? residential, commercial or
undevelo
f. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal?
municipal
g. Signed and dated agent authorization letter, if applicable.
NOTE: Wetlands or Waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to:
1. Issuance of a Section 404 Corps of Engineers Permit,
2. Either the issuance or waiver of a 401 Division of Environmental
Management (Water Quality) certification, and
3. (in the twenty coastal counties only) A letter from the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management stating the proposed activity is consistent
with the North Carolina oastal Management program.
(7- L - -- ?,P l?C17S
Owner's en's ignature Date
(Agent's signature valid only if Agent Authorization Letter from the owner is provided
(18 g.))
WAKEFIELD WETLAND ROAD IMPACTS
r>s ,?i•,
• ?3i
t F
aw.)c cu ?, J . 4
o eoo 3 ? f
--? a ) f'II' rz)
E
rF !
ook"
D . L?
)
B d ? ??F 4
> ! f
j?gg
F
'r t tAfAtC£ f & W'
t
•?> f .fie.` ? , i. ?? §d ?? ? ? %'? I ? .. '?
/ I Ii ? T . _ J J
:Xll! Y 77'x?.1 ??' 1? ti ? I ? "py ~ ,
71-1
f ? I ii f ill 1
mt

S
R
WETLAND IMPACTS
WAKEFIELD 8-98 SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS. Inc.
S&EC JOB #3037
244 Nwl Y16.aaY 0wa00w44, Nae1n Oav0.n 27000-010) ME-?W
WAKEFIELD ROADS WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
( NW26 )
IMPACT WIDTH LENGTH AREA LOCATION
A 7ft 220ft 1540 FT2 WAKEFIELD
PLANTATION BLVD
BY GOLF HOLE 7
B 7ft 160ft 1120 ft2 WAKEFIELD
PLANTATION BLVD
BY GOLF HOLE 16
C 7ft 170ft 1 190 ft2 WAKEFIELD
PLANTATION BLVD
BY GOLF HOLE 4
D Sft 100ft 500 ft2 UNNAMMED
STREET BELOW
GOLF HOLE 17
E 7ft looft 700 ft2 PROPOSED STIZEI''r
BELOW GOLF DOLE
4
F 5ft 1 loft 550 ft2 KELWAY DRIVE
BELOW YMCA
TOTAL AREA 5600 ft2 = 0.129ac
WAKEFIELD CHANNEL STABILAZATION TABLE
(NW13)
AREA LENGTH
A 40ft
B 30ft
c 40ft
D 35ft
E 30ft
F 30ft
l /950 Il ? 1 1 \.•
•,Fr- .
qlu
:j 5?
2000 \\.? ~

302
-- -?? ,.
o 1

_-?WZt

I»
?i
V?
cM •``//nli?
O _ II
\ I T _; i
50 ' ?? w
r
I ? g ? 4•` I
r 0 /?
® Son o ti?
i SCALE 1:24000
* 1 0 1 MILE
MN_ GN 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET -
T .5 0 1 KILOMETER !
7•
124 MILS 1.26' CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
25 MILS
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929
WAKE FOREST QUADRANGLE
UTM GRID AND 1987 MAGNETIC NORTH NORTH CAROLINA-WAKE CO.
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET 7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
NE/4 RALEIGH 15' QUADRANGLE

City of Raleigh
North earolina.
May 27, 1998
Mr. Ted L. Bartelt, PE
Alpha & Omega Group, PC
3100 Spring Forest Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, N. C. 27616
Reference: Culvert at Sta. 59=00, Plantation. Blvd. - Wakefield Subdivision
Dear Mr. Bartelt:
The purpose of this document is to respond to your request for the City to accept the use
of a corrugated steel plate arch culvert at the above referenced site. You have indicated
owever you e
your knowledge that the City does not accept metal pipe construction however-
also indicated there are circumstances warranting special consideration.
Wetland issues seem to be the driving force for most of the case. Your follow up letter of
5-7-98 responds to issues discussed at our 4-27-98 meeting. As I understand the
situation, this crossing was not submitted to the Corps of Engineers as a site where
wetlands would be filled. The developer has two choices. He can now obtain a wetlands
permit or build the road without filling wetlands. After pursuing this, it has been
determined by the Attomey General that the "residential" portion of the Wakefield
Subdivision is grandfathered from the Neuse Basin Buffer Rules. Further, State D WO
has indicated Wakefield would lose their grandfathering if additional wetland permits are
re uir d. Since a standard reinforced concrete box culvert would require filling wetlands.
alternative designs have been considered.
State D WQ's interpretation of zero disturbances has resulted in the proposal to utilize a
bottomless arch culvert design. The City has expressed two major concerns. The first
involves the appropriate footing design since part o the crossing will be on rock while
some will be on soil. You have indicated this will be addressed in the final design if the
conceptual de-sign is approved.
OFFICES • 222'NEST HARGETT STRE?T • POST O=-ICE BOX 590 • RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602
TO'd Noiins I??IH 01 -IdNlInU 1 '8 SNAH11M WOdd bS:60 8661-BT-onu

Mr. Ted L. Bartelt. PE
May 27, 1998
Pace 2
The second concern is the fact that the pipe arch will become unusuable or fail f tc +i,
a reinforced concrete structure
expenetlced metE
scenario will last
as r an
Consultation with one of State DOT's most
engineers confirms our belief that a metal tripe used under this
half as long as a -reinforced concrete box culvert.
Based on the above, I can recommend acceptance of your. proposal provided the owner is
willing to provide adequate funds to the City for replacement of the pipe arch based on a
.
life expectancy of 40 ears vs. that of a concrete structure being in the 75 to 100 year
range.
Please advise acceptance of this condition and we can work out details at a later date.
Needless to say, putting the City in such an awkward position as this has caused quite a
bit of cionceM. It should be noted that obtaining a wetlands permit without first assurin,
that the construction option meets City standards in the future will not be considered
Sincere
City
Sykes, PL
cc: City Manager Benton
Stormwater Services Manager Bowden
FO ' d NO11-S A-1-118 01 IONSf1H?? ?8 SNc 3HI I M WON--J bS : ea 8661-eT-onu
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
A
T4
;01J i
soft
[D F-= F1
May 23, 1997
Wake County
DWQ Project # 961148
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. Danny Colton
1802 Bright Road
Suite 320
Landover, MD 20785
Dear Mr. Colton:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to fill and
excavate in 0.2934 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose of Wakefield subdivision in Raleigh, NC,
as you described in your application dated 20 December 1996, 31 January 1997 and 20 May 1997. After
reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality
Certification Numbers 3101, 3103 and 3108. These certifications allow you to use Nationwide Permit
Numbers 12, 14 and 26 when it is issued by the Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should get any
other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to)
Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed
regulations. This approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless
otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except
as modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a
new application. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre,
compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this
approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional
conditions listed below.
Deed restrictions, conservation easements or similar mechanisms shall be placed in all lots with
remaining jurisdictional wetlands to prevent future fill within 30 days of the date of this letter. A stream
mitigation plan to compensate for the 481 linear feet of stream impacts shall be submitted to DWQ
within 6 weeks of this letter. Otherwise, mitigation requirements can be satisfied by participating in the
Wetland Restoration Program within 6 weeks of this letter. The wetlands at crossing #1 for Falls of the
Neuse Road shall be left in their current vegetative condition. An additional 401 Certification will be
required for the remainder of the site (i.e. commercial properties). A small tributary adjacent to the
proposed Neuse River bridge crossing should be avoided. Deed restrictions, conservation easements or
similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining jurisdictional wetlands to prevent future
fill within 30 days of the date of this letter.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send
Division of Water Quality - Environmental Sciences Branch
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
Page 2
DWQ Project #961148
May 23, 1997
a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office
of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Mr. John Domey
Central Files
Craig Bromby; Huton & Williams
ston Howard, Jr. P2
961148.1tr

® Barrett Kays & Associates
Environmental Sciences
Civil Engineering
Environmental Engineering
Planning
Landscape Architecture
Pre-Permit Application Meeting
December 19, 1996, 10:00 a.m.
General Agenda
Inrod uctions
Permitting Agent for all Permittees: Jim Spangler, BKA Project Manager 919.828.1903
• Residential Owner/Permittee: Wakefield Developers, LLC, 1802 Brightseat Road, Landover,
MD 20785, Attn. Danny Colton.
• Commercial Owner/Permittee: Atlantic Real Estate Corporation, 100 Capitola Dr., Suite 309,
Durham, NC 27713, Attn: Rick Rowe.
• Falls of Neuse Road, Phase 1 Co-Owners/Permittees: Wakefield Developers (as above) and
Anvil Associates, LLP, 1003 High House Road, Suite 105, Cary, NC 27513, Attn: Tim
Smith. *NOTE: This project will become City of Raleigh-owned.
• Falls of Neuse Road, Phase 2 Owner/Permittee: City of Raleigh or NCDOT
Overview of Wakefield Masterplan
Project-Specific Discussions

Sewer Line Infrastructure Projects
1. Upper Neuse Sewer Extension. Multiple impact locatioi.WP 12. Apply 12/20/96,
2. Richland Creek Trunk Sewer. Multiple impact locations. NWP 12. Apply 12/20/96 &c?
wu??t -?icP^ '3. Residential Subdivision Collectors. Multiple impact locations. NWP 12. Apply?
(jNbl? ,14. Commercial Subdivision Collectors. Multiple impact locations. NWP 12. Apply ?
lV 1G? *(design done by others)
Roadway Projects
1. Relocation of Falls of Neuse Road, Phase 1. Multiple NWP 14. Apply 12/20/96
2. Plantation Drive Residential Collector. Multiple NWP 14. Apply 12/20/96
3. Commercial Collectors. Multiple NWP 14. Apply 12/20/96
4. Residential Subdivision Streets. Multiple NWP 14. Apply ?
Other Development Projects, probably utilizing NWP 26. All apply after Jan 1, 1997*
1. Residential Development Headwaters Impacts
2. Commercial Development Headwaters Impacts
3. Golf Course/Residential Stormwater Structure Impacts
4. Commercial Development Stormwater Structure Impacts
5. Relocation of Falls of Neuse Road, Phase 2
*(involves potential COE reconsideration of prior wetland delineation)
224 EAYETTEVILLE STRFET MALL
SUITE 100, P.O. BOX 2979
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602-2979
TELEPHONE [phone]
FACSIMILE 919 828-036.
III III
m m m m m m m m No
COMMUNITY RIVERINE SHRUB/EMERGENT MIXED MESOPHYTIC
ASSEMBLAGE BOTTOMLAND POOLS HARDWOOD FOREST
HARDWOOD FOREST
Swamp Chestnut Oak Cinnamon Fern American Beech
CANOPY Cherrybark Oak
Green Ash Rushes
Sedges Northern Red Oak
White Oak
VEGETATION American Elm Smartweed Southern Red Oak
Willow Oak Arrowhead Pignut Hickory
Yellow Poplar Lizard's Tail Black Gum
Water Oak Cattail
Sugarberry Peat Moss
Streambank vegetation

Tag Alder
Buttonbush
Black Willow
Elderberry
River Birch
American Sycamore
Ironwood
Viburnum

LAND FORM Floodplain Flats Floodplain Pools Upland Terraces and
Oxbows Slopes
Conceptual Model of Target Community Patterns Figure: ?s
EcoScience
Corporation Concord Mills Wetland Mitigation Site Project: 98-007
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Date: June 1998
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
244 West Millbrook Road ¦ Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 ¦ [phone] ¦ Fax [phone]
Us Army Corps of Engineers NCDEHNR-DWQ A ,?p
Attn: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer Attn: Mr. John Dorneyo Usl?
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road - Suite 120 4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27615 - 6846 Raleigh, NC 27607 '
August 28, 1997
Re::equest fo"dditional impact under Nationwide 14 permit (Action ID # 199602047)
at Wakefield Development - residential portion.
Dear Mr. Alsmeyer and Dorney:
In a letter dated July 23, 1997, the Corps of Engineers authorized impacts under
Nationwide Permits 12, 13, and 14 for various activities relative to the development of
Wakefield Plantation residential. and golf course project in northern Wake County. In a
subsequent review of one road crossing area which was previously thought to a non-
impact site, it was discovered that a section of a small eroded channel would need to be
impacted for road construction.
On August 4, 1997 I visited the site with Mr. Eric Galamb of the NCDEHNR-DWQ
Raleigh office. We observed that the channel, which shows as jurisdictional on the most
recent approved wetland delineation, was basically an overflow channel from a small farm
pond. The principal spillway has apparently become clogged/damaged in years past and
during storm events water flows over the edge of the dam and around to the original,
natural creek channel. The channel is mostly in upland, manmade material, does not
appear to have base flow, and is nearly void of any vegetation. The area to be impacted is
approximately 4' wide at top of bank and approximately 100' in length, resulting in 400
square feet (0.009 acres) of impact to a channel of minimal function. The natural channel
portion downstream is not planned to be impacted.
We are requesting that this be added to the impacts which are presently authorized under
Nationwide 14 for the project. This impact is in an area which is scheduled for
construction in the very near future and we would appreciate any consideration you could
give in a timely response. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Since
r • p
ke Orto - Soil and
Consultants, Inc.
Soil/Site Evaluation ¦ Mapping and Physical Analysis ¦ Wetlands Mapping and Mitigation ¦ Environmental Audits
On-Site Waste Treatment Systems, Evaluation and Design
_UD
I-LiffiR E± J
3-N

e

W? -?,e l?l s. ?
4j v ;c C-
f 6Trb r?
AY V4 4e
1--) A 6 /L? li
hay CP?? ?r??????
L ? 7Z??P Est ? V?

w /a2-
spa
vvvAf-
IA9
Alf ? w
?--
c

w
l
5, Azae,
-ell
-it 41
I
?7Po7 c 02?,?c?O/C)c.
Ag Oct
,C rnno
10ju
I INS CQV?' Ke f Gl o3 4-Ne,lo CP-?? o v3e> a- d f-eS c d,a-,A w?
dt v4o e C P , ©? •? ar c l ?l ??
oSeS
`ZGf Lf /l wf
f Oc?S Fu?'S aF NtuSG ?,?oc ?oh? S ??`' o
3/ ?tL `0Pi f rocec?5 :5cA?u.(
o?
4 ` Q C,4,?s more iA-? ?4er "J
ho (san. 1q?7) . Coy W;?? yet - ??? s
- orvt ,?eSf D? S v i S%o?- ?q vl ce 'se , CO Qs?ee, s
ffavt 13/9 7' G?iniH?rc?G- f r`c.or ?'y`? 1M-
l ,G?' 7? i a s Uic ?J CD t,,Ja-I-d AA,t Q-n
ut,
?) CDC lefele- ?/4n y ?lfoh 04 SK 171?7
W1 cv??] 041)^a-? Ae
G
i.ac-f vJc re s ? Jv),al
44'd
cow(St Art ro.S©o/614.74e) ??o. G /'oar/ sy ---
y
jao 27/? 7 ??'IK Wig
31/? 7
.
.? .
dyc s? ?&j4 efc . we-
/d ?) Cow/?r?1C? (???o ?7? - Cod o?u?O ?°`t ???? ??.s?l. a? !?
rr? /?'t ?? /97 Coe 4,6440 ,Oa e d a ?
w ? fmAl
.P?lvU,?.c s . ? ?/lD ecl C? n?
tc
s' fle?•- i s aj
?.-
Nwp we
r Z I i GJ z7 9 7
-3 il? 7 &I&-ea add?
74 ?-
?' y C? (-- ZOad GoZwie / sci
Qom' ? ?C vw C?co? tom.- ori-e- a?ca.tj vim- , (?
5
JIAP& fYV 6W
Coe /1/ VIP
q&O
?' a?Ceae.
76
A
Z3 ?7 I)P4 wp%av 2 93?1
Itef( IL ®-6 Z ?t (41 2,&). a 1?L ?r 'y'o IOt 1orJ ?a
17
?Ssr ,?? its?de?'`
2f f
zZ'. f 2-1/17 So,-J fel d • 30
s?
? 3 R? Nc -Fw, le ?lf?.,-n ??cs. ?f-J s ?o tp?e44Si'&
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
4 *•
ArW&
NC ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 18, 1998
Wake County
DWQ Project # 961148
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS and Neuse River Buffer
Rules
Mr. Billy Sutton
Wakefield Developers
12492 Falls of the Neuse Road
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Dear Mr. Sutton:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material in an
additional 0.008 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose of modifying previously permitted road crossings at Wakefield
Residential and Sunstar Homes Tracts, as you described in your application dated December 3, 1998. After reviewing your
application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Numbers 3102 and 3103. These
certifications allow you to use Nationwide Permit Numbers 13 and 14 when the Corps of Engineers issues them. This approval is
also valid for the Neuse River buffer rules (15A NCAC 2B .033). In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local
permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater,
Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA
permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified below. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required
as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the
attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
1. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining jurisdictional wetlands and waters or areas within
50 feet of all streams and ponds to notify the state in order to assure compliance for future wetland and/or water impact. These
mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of this letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later).
2. All other conditions of our earlier Certification dated September 23, 1997 and September 24, 1998.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act
within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-
7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have
any questions, please telephone John Domey at 919-733-1786.
n rely,
1
y ston ow Jr. IRE
Attachment r
3,
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
John Domey
Central Files
Kevin Martin; S & E C
961148.1tr
Division of Water Quality • Non-Discharge Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
244 West Millbrook Road ¦ Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 ¦ [phone] ¦ Fax [phone]

September 23, 1998
Job #97-3037
SEP 2 51998
US Army Corps of Engineers WETLANDS GROUP NCDEH&NR-DWQ
Attn: Mr. Todd Tugwell (L. A. VATER UALITY SECTIM Attn: Eric Galamb
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120 4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27615 Raleigh, NC 27607
Re: Nationwide Permits 26, 14 and 13 Wakefield Residential Tract.
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
The purpose of this letter is to revise our previous request dated 8/31/98 for the
authorization of Nationwide Permit 26 for 0.129 acres and NW 13 for 205'. The
project is located in Wake County north of the Neuse River, west of Highway 1
and east of Falls of the Neuse Road near Wake Forest, NC (see Site Vicinity
Map). Impacts will not change nor will locations but we now intend to ask that
impacts C & E be covered under Nationwide Permit 14. Previously the Corps
issued a NW 14 Permit for impact #9 (see attached Barret Keys & Associates
map) on the same stream as currently proposed impact C & E. Therefore as we
currently understand your policy this crossing may be eligible to utilize NW 1.4.
We desire to do so in order to avoid an Individual Permit.
All impacts will result from the fill of jurisdictional waters for roads for the
development (see Site Plan). Impacts A, B, & C are at the same location as in the
previously submitted site plan by BKA. However, BKA did not request impacts
at these locations for some unknown reason. Impacts D,E & F are additional
crossings that have been required by the City of Raleigh and were not on the
site plan originally. The Corps and DWQ have determined that impacts A, C, D,
E, and F are to significant channels. DWQ is requiring that mitigation for these
700' of stream impacts be made via payment of $87,500 into the WRP. We hope
such mitigation will be adequate for Corps requirements.
A table showing previous project impacts to jurisdictional areas, current
proposed impacts as revised and resultant totals is enclosed. Wetland acreage
impacts as proposed are below the DWQ 1 acre mitigation threshold. Our
clients plan to mitigate is to pay into the state WRP fund. Please note, if possible
due to Corps policy change regarding NW 14, our client desires to reserve the
option to re-permit impacts D & F under NW 14. The sole purpose of doing so
would be to reduce the linear feet of stream channel impacts that count toward
the NW 26 500' maximum.
Soil/Site Evaluation ¦ Mapping and Physical Analysis ¦ Wetlands Mapping and Mitigation ¦ Environmental Audit:
On-Site Waste Treatment Systems, Evaluation and Design

Please contact us if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Kevin C. Martin
Note: Agent authorization letters were previously submitted to the Corps and
DWQ for this project.
KCM/edk
Wakefield Residential Wetland Impacts Currently Requested
NW 13 NW 14 NW12 NW 26
0.03 acres-
205 linear ft. 0.043 acres
270 linear ft 0 0.086 acres
430'
Previous Wakefield Impacts (Approved b Corps") Commercial & Residential
0.02 0.26 0.58 0.767
Linear ft.? Total Width (75' sig. Channel)
110'
Wakefield Proiect Totals if Residential Permitted As Revised
--- - ------
0.05 -- - I --
0.303 0.58
--- 0.602

205+ linear ft.?
Total Width J
Total Width
124' 430'
Note: Impacts shown on the enclosed map and table fall under Nationwide
Permits 26, 13, & 14.
Site visits by DWQ and the Corps have occurred to determine
"significant" streams. The client's "plan to mitigate" is to pay into the
state WRP program. $87,500 for 700' of impacts of locations A, C, D, E &
F.
** DWQ 401 is still pending for commercial impacts previously approved by
Corps. Impact S2 approved by the Corps included 75' of significant
stream channel impact that will not occur because DWQ will not be able
to approve the stormwater pond at this location due to the Neuse Buffer
Rules. Therefore, prior to this application significant stream impacts = 0.
This fact is reflected in the total 430' if the requested impacts are
approved. Also, impacts B1, B2, B4, B5 and S3 (0.251 acres) will not be
allowed due to Neuse Basin Buffer rules. This is reflected in the project
total 0.602 acres of impact under NW 26 if the requested impacts are
approved.

WAKEFIELD ROADS WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
INIl'ACT WIDTH LENGTH AREA LOCATION
A 7ft 220ft 1540 ft WAKEFIELD
NW 26 PLANTATION
BLVD BY GOLF
HOLE 7
B 7ft 160ft 1120 ft WAKEFIELD
NW 26 PLANTATION
BLVD BY GOLF
HOLE 16
C 7ft 170ft 1190 ft WAKEFIELD
NW 14 PLANTATION
BLVD BY GOLF
HOLE 4
D 5ft 100ft 500 ft UNNAMIvIED
NW 26 STREET BELOW
GOLF HOLE 17
E 7ft 100ft 700 ft PROPOSED
NW 14 STREET BELOW
GOLF HOLE 4
F 5ft I loft 550 ft KELWAY DRIVE
NW 26 BELOW YMCA
TOTAL AREA 5600 fe = 0.129ac
WAKEFIELD CHANNEL STABILAZATION TABLE
(NW131

AREA LENGTH
A 40ft
B . " 30ft
c 40ft
D 35ft
E 30ft
F 30ft
SSoU-Environmental Consultants, Inc.

244 West Millbrook Road ¦ Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 ¦ [phone] ¦ Fax [phone]
December 3, 1998
Job #97-3656
US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
N DEH&NR-DWQ
Eric Galamb
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Re: Revision to Existing Nationwide Permit 14 Wakefield Residential Tract.
Dear Mr. Alsmeyer:
The purpose of this letter is to revise a previous NW 14 permit by increasing the
impact under Nationwide Permit 14 by 0.008 acres from 0.0046 acres originally
approved. The project is located in Wake County north of the Neuse River, west
of Highway 1 and east of Falls of the Neuse Road near Wake Forest, NC (see Site
Vicinity Map). Impacts and location will change slightly. Previously the Corps
issued a NW 14 Permit for impact #9 (see attached Barret Keys & Associates
map) on the same stream but at a different location. The current proposal is to
move the impact upstream.
All impacts will result from the fill of jurisdictional waters for a road for the
Crosland Apartment Site 5 development (see Site Plan). 32' of rip rap will also
be required under non reporting NW 13. Previously 67 of channel was
impacted by road crossing #9 but final design at the proposed location requires
112' of pipe.
A table showing previous project impacts to jurisdictional areas, current
proposed impacts as revised and resultant totals is enclosed. Wetland acreage
impacts as proposed are below the DWQ 1 acre mitigation threshold. Impacts
are to a Corps "unimportant" and DWQ "insignificant" stream so no mitigation
should be required. However, the client was previously charged for mitigation
at impact # 9 so he will likely desire to utilize the credit elsewhere at a later date.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Kevin C. Martin
KCM/ edk
Note: Agent authorization letters were previously submitted to the Corps and
DWQ for this project.
Soil/Site Evaluation ¦ Mapping and Physical Analysis ¦ Wetlands Mapping and Mitigation ¦ Environmental Audits
On-Site Waste Treatment Systems, Evaluation and Design

Wakefield Residential Wetland Impacts Currently Requested
NW 13 NW 14 NW12 NW 26
0.002
32 ft. 0.008 acres
45 linear ft 0 0
Previous Wakefield Impacts (Approved b Corps") Commercial & Residential
0.056 0.303 0.58 0.767
Linear ft.? Total Width (75' sig. Channel)
255' 124'
Wakefield Project Totals if Residential Permitted As Revised
0.058 0.311 0.58 0.602
287 linear ft.? Total Width Total Width
124' 430'
DWQ 401 is still pending for commercial impacts previously approved by
Corps.
Note: Client is on an extremely tight time schedule to try to "beat" the wet
season. Anything you can do to expedite processing of this minor request
would be greatly appreciated.
L ?
DWQ ID:
Mailing Address: 12492 Falls of Neuse Road
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #): 13 & 14
Pre-Construction Notification Application
For Nationwide Permits that Require:
1) Notification to the Corps of Engineers
2) Application for Section 401 Certification
3) Coordination with the NC Division of Coastal Management
Send the original and (1) copy of this completed form to the appropriate field office of
the Corps of Engineers (see agency addresses sheet). Seven (7) copies should be sent to
the NC Division of Environmental Management (see agency addresses sheet). PLEASE
PRINT.
1. Owner's Name: Wakefield Developers - Attn: Billy Sutton
2.
City: Wake Forest
State: NC Zip Code: 27587
Project location address, including subdivision name (if different from mailing address
above): see attached vicinity map
3) Telephone Number (Home):
Corps Action ID: See Item 8a
Subdivision Name: Wakefield
4) If applicable, agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone
number:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Phone: [phone]
(Work): 919-556-4310
244 West Millbrook Road
Fax: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27609
5. Location of work (provide a map, preferable a copy of USGS topographic map or
aerial photograph with scale):
County: Wake Nearest town or city: Wake Forest
Specific Location (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
West of Highway 1 and south of Highway 98 (see attached USGS Quad
vicinity map)
6. Impacted or nearest stream/river: unnamed tributaries of Richland Creek
River Basin: Neuse
7a. Is project located near water classified as trout, tidal saltwater (SA), high quality
waters (HQW), outstanding resource waters (ORW), water supply (WS-I or WS-
II)? YES E] NO ® If yes, explain:
7b. If the project is located within a North Carolina division of coastal management
area of environmental concern (AEC)? YES ? NO
7c.
If the project is located within a coastal county (see page 7 for list of coastal
counties), what is the land use plan (LUP) designation?
8a. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property?
YES ® NO ? If yes, provide Action ID number of pervious permit and
any additional information (including photocopy of 401 certification).
#199602047, #199708091, #199708092, #199708093
8b. Are additional permit requests expected for this property in the future?
YES ? NO ? If yes, describe anticipated work:
do not know at this time
9a. Estimated total number of acres in tract of land: 1,900 total project of which 1400
acres within residential tract
9b. Estimated total number or acres of wetlands located on project site: >50
10a. Number of acres of wetlands impacted by the proposed project by:
Filling: .008 (14),.002 (13) Excavation:
Flooding: Other:
Drainage: Total acres to be impacted:.008 (14)
.002 (13)
10b. (1) Stream channel to be impacted by the proposed project (if relocated,
provide distance both before and after relocation):
Length before: 144' total
After:
previously authorized)
Width Before (based on normal high water contours):
Width After:
Average depth before:
(2) Stream channel impacts will result from: (check all that apply)
Open channel relocation: ? Placement of pipe in channel: N112' total
67 previously authorized
Channel Excavation: ? Construction of a Dam/Flooding: ?
Other: stream bank stabilization with rip rap (32')
11. If construction of a pond is proposed, what is the size of the watershed draining to
the pond?
What is the expected pond surface area?
12. Description of proposed work including discussion of type of mechanical
equipment to be used (attach plans 81/2" x 11" drawings only):
After:
construction of roads for a residential development
13. Purpose of proposed work: development of residential property on
uplands
14. State reasons why it is believed that this activity must be carried out in wetlands
(include any measures taken to minimize wetland impacts):
To gain access to "high" ground. See S&EC letter attached.
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) (see agency addresses sheet) regarding
the presence of any federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or
threatened species or critical habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the
proposed project. Date contacted: (attach responses from these agencies).
handled by USACOE
16. You are required to contact the state historic preservation officer (SHPO) (see
agency address sheet) regarding the presence of historic properties in the permit
area which may be affected by the proposed project. Date contacted:
handled by USACOE
17. Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (state)
land?
YES ? NO ® If no, go to 18.
a. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document
pursuant to the requirements of the North Carolina Environmental Policy
Act?
YES ? NO ?
b. If yes, has the document been reviewed through the North Carolina
Department of Administration State Clearinghouse?
YES ? NO ?
If answers to 17b is YES, then submit appropriate documentation from the state
clearinghouse to division of environmental management regarding compliance
with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Questions regarding the State Clearinghouse review process should be directed to
Ms. Chrys Baggett, Director State Clearinghouse, North Carolina Department of
Administration, 116 West Jones Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-8003,
telephone [phone].
18. The following items should be included with this application if proposed activity
involves the discharge of excavated or fill material into wetlands:
a. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, lakes and ponds on
the property (for Nationwide Permit numbers 14, 18, 21, 26, 29 and 38). All
streams (intermittent and permanent) on the property must be shown on the
map. Map scales should be 1 inch equals 50 feet or 1 inch equals 100 feet or
their equivalent.
b. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant
to the placement of the delineation line.
d. Attach a copy of the stormwater management plan, if required.
e. What is land used of surrounding property? residential, commercial or
undeveloped
f. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal?
municipal
g. Signed and dated agent authorization letter, if applicable.
NOTE: Wetlands or Waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to:
1. Issuance of a Section 404 Corps of Engineers Permit,
2. Either the issuance or waiver of a 401 Division of Environmental
Management (Water Quality) certification, and
3. (in the twenty coastal counties only) A letter from the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management stating the proposed activity is consistent
with the North Carolina Coastal Management program.
Owner's/Agent' s Signature Date
(Agent's signature valid only if Agent Authorization Letter from the owner is provided
(18 g.))
! J f is 0
-' roy'??1
L41
1
r
? r
r I
? Ir
0
?o ••. f
f
lei I
'o IL
Z0Q LtiS'ON L9b69b8 F -1?INAOUN T SN3HlIM 921ZZ 86i20iET
?s
bill
9
r

ti
c
i
i
r,

t
OOP7-;AKEFIELD WETLAND ROAD IMPACTS
o new 4
i
E
B ----------------------- -? C ?iF ?..
A
F
Ap -J, 1 4 ?
Y ) x1" '1
III'
???i?tA.FC7 GY'EJ!7L'R ? '•N ? 'x" ? i r I ', fi rta -sr..T: o.< t ??:
p
Q .u. mu:
WETLAND IMPACTS .wm xxc,
WAKEFIELD 8-98 SOIL. & LNIARONMENIAL CONSULTANTS, Inc. w.ao1s:
S&EC JOB #3037
6
- 211
M..1 wr.a.. a..i.x.?.y., wax f:.-.n.. izrox.(Np sa-sooo
t)
l
l b \ I 11' / ?\ r h
;.S
?U((' 302
R ?
Ix
/
,

_-
\
Jj?
ub?
Jfl

A
?p/j, lCO,N Z 1 4 INYMw

MN
GN
124 MILS
25 MILS
AID AND 1987 MAGNETIC NORTH
.MATION AT CENTER Of SHEF.T
ff. vl, wgg
SCALE 1:24 Opp +' a
ti
N4
0
1rm
1 u 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 1 MILE
7000 FEET
E3= -- _ S 0
1 KILOMETER
CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
NATIONAL GEOOETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929
WAKE FOREST OUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA-WAKE CO.
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
NE/4 RA1_EIOl1 15' QUADRANOI:E
and
. {
I?„? 9cliyg
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
244 West Millbrook Road ¦ RaleiWI N6a Carolina 27609 ¦ [phone] ¦ Fax [phone]
December 3, 1998
Job #97-3876
US Army Corps of Engii
Attn: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
6508 Falls of the Neuse I
Raleigh, NC 27615
NCDEH&NR-DWQ
Attn: John Dorney
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Re: Nationwide Permits 14 and 13 Wakefield Residential Tract (Sunstar
Homes Tract).
Dear Mr. Alsmeyer & Mr. Dorney:
The purpose of this letter is to revise a previous Nationwide 14 permit for the
project. The project is located in Wake County north of the Neuse River, west of
Highway 1 and east of Falls of the Neuse Road near Wake Forest, NC (see Site
Vicinity Map). Impacts totals not changed under NW 14. Previously the Corps
issued a NW 14 Permit for impact #10 (see attached Barret Keys & Associates
map). However, BKA only requested 63 linear feet of impact. Current designs
indicated 122' of piping will be needed and 50' of rip rap under non-reporting
NW 13. The previously approved impact at site #2 for 62' of stream will no
longer be required. Therefore even though crossing #10 is larger since no impact
will occur at #2 there is no net change in total impact.
A table showing previous project impacts to jurisdictional areas, current
proposed impacts as revised and resultant totals is enclosed. Wetland acreage
impacts as proposed are below the DWQ 1 acre mitigation threshold. We do not
believe this impact is to a Corps "important" nor a DWQ Significant Stream so
mitigation should not be required.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
ve"? cx?r-' 14L
Kevin C. Martin
Note: Agent authorization letters were previously submitted to the Corps and
DWQ for this project.
KCM/edk
Soil/Site Evaluation ¦ Mapping and Physical Analysis ¦ Wetlands Mapping and Mitigation ¦ Environmental Audits
On-Site Waste Treatment Systems, Evaluation and Design
Additional Wakefield Residential Wetland Impacts Currently Requested
NW 13 NW 14 NW12 NW 26
0.006
50 ft. 0 0 0
Previous Wakefield Impacts (Approved by Corps") Commercial & Residential
0.02 0.303 0.58 0.767
Linear ft.? Total Width (75' sig. Channel)
124'
Wakefield Project Totals if Residential Permitted As Revised
0.056 0.303 0.58 0.602
255+ linear ft.? Total Width Total Width
124' 430'
DWQ 401 is still pending for commercial impacts previously approved by
Corps.
Sunstar.tbl
DWQ ID: Corps Action ID: See Item 8a
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit ft 13 & 14
Pre-Construction Notification Application
For Nationwide Permits that Require:
1) Notification to the Corps of Engineers
2) Application for Section 401 Certification
3) Coordination with the NC Division of Coastal Management
Send the original and (1) copy of this completed form to the appropriate field office of
the Corps of Engineers (see agency addresses sheet). Seven (7) copies should be sent to
the NC Division of Environmental Management (see agency addresses sheet). PLEASE
PRINT.
1. Owner's Name: Wakefield Developers - Attn: Billy Sutton
2.
Subdivision Name: Wakefield
City: Wake Forest
State: NC Zip Code: 27587
Project location address, including subdivision name (if different from mailing address
above): see attached vicinity map
3) Telephone Number (Home):
(Work): 919-556-4310
4) If applicable, agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone
number:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Phone: [phone]
244 West Millbrook Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Fax: [phone]
5. Location of work (provide a map, preferable a copy of USGS topographic map or
aerial photograph with scale):
Mailing Address: 12492 Falls of Neuse Road
County: Wake Nearest town or city: Wake Forest
Specific Location (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
West of Highway 1 and south of Highway 98 (see attached USGS Quad
vicinity map)
6. Impacted or nearest stream/river: unnamed tributaries of Richland Creek
River Basin: Neuse
7a. Is project located near water classified as trout, tidal saltwater (SA), high quality
waters (HQW), outstanding resource waters (ORW), water supply (WS-I or WS-
In? YES ? NO ® If yes, explain:
7b. If the project is located within a North Carolina division of coastal management
area of environmental concern (AEC)? YES ? NO
7c.
If the project is located within a coastal county (see page 7 for list of coastal
counties), what is the land use plan (LUP) designation?
8a. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property?
YES ® NO ? If yes, provide Action ID number of pervious permit and
any additional information (including photocopy of 401 certification).
#199602047,#199708091,#199708092,#199708093
8b. Are additional permit requests expected for this property in the future?
YES ? NO ? If yes, describe anticipated work:
do not know at this time
9a. Estimated total number of acres in tract of land: 1,900 total project of which 1400
acres within residential tract
9b. Estimated total number or acres of wetlands located on project site: >50
10a. Number of acres of wetlands impacted by the proposed project by:
Filling: 0.006 (13) Excavation:
Flooding:
Other:
Drainage: Total acres to be impacted: 0.006 NW 13
NW14 impacts not to change.
10b. (1) Stream channel to be impacted by the proposed project (if relocated,
provide distance both before and after relocation):
Length before: 170'
Width Before (based on normal high water contours):
Width After:
Average depth before:
After:
After:
(2) Stream channel impacts will result from: (check all that apply)
Open channel relocation: ? Placement of pipe in channel: ® 122'
Channel Excavation: ? Construction of a Dam/Flooding: ?
Other: stream bank stabilization with rip rap (50')
11. If construction of a pond is proposed, what is the size of the watershed draining to
the pond?
What is the expected pond surface area?
12. Description of proposed work including discussion of type of mechanical
equipment to be used (attach plans 81/2" x 11" drawings only):
construction of a road for a residential development
13. Purpose of proposed work: development of residential property on
uplands
14. State reasons why it is believed that this activity must be carried out in wetlands
(include any measures taken to minimize wetland impacts):
To gain access to "high" ground. See S&EC letter attached.
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) (see agency addresses sheet) regarding
the presence of any federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or
threatened species or critical habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the
proposed project. Date contacted: (attach responses from these agencies).
handled by USACOE
16. You are required to contact the state historic preservation officer (SHPO) (see
agency address sheet) regarding the presence of historic properties in the permit
area which may be affected by the proposed project. Date contacted:
handled by USACOE
17. Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (state)
land?
YES ? NO ® If no, go to 18.
a. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document
pursuant to the requirements of the North Carolina Environmental Policy
Act?
YES ? NO ?
b. If yes, has the document been reviewed through the North Carolina
Department of Administration State Clearinghouse?
YES ? NO ?
If answers to 17b is YES, then submit appropriate documentation from the state
clearinghouse to division of environmental management regarding compliance
with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Questions regarding the State Clearinghouse review process should be directed to
Ms. Chrys Baggett, Director State Clearinghouse, North Carolina Department of
Administration, 116 West Jones Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-8003,
telephone [phone].
18. The following items should be included with this application if proposed activity
involves the discharge of excavated or fill material into wetlands:
a. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, lakes and ponds on
the property (for Nationwide Permit numbers 14, 18, 21, 26, 29 and 38). All
streams (intermittent and permanent) on the property must be shown on the
map. Map scales should be 1 inch equals 50 feet or 1 inch equals 100 feet or
their equivalent.
b. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant
to the placement of the delineation line.
d. Attach a copy of the stormwater management plan, if required.
e. What is land used of surrounding property? residential, commercial or
undeveloped
If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal?
municipal
g. Signed and dated agent authorization letter, if applicable.
NOTE: Wetlands or Waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to:
1. Issuance of a Section 404 Corps of Engineers Permit,
2. Either the issuance or waiver of a 401 Division of Environmental
Management (Water Quality) certification, and
3. (in the twenty coastal counties only) A letter from the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management stating the proposed activity is consistent
with the North Carolina Coastal Management program.
4?&Ock l2-
Owner's/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature valid only if Agent Authorization Letter from the owner is provided
(18 g.))
OCT-27-SS 0S=3S FROM:SUNSTAR HOMES CORP ID: PAGE 2/2
A .r
46
`? - - MY r
's"' d0 ?`• Jam,
7 -••/i t r
Rc,
\\,' 36
n O t'?zlvwnl
'SIL
O I fi'V\
fD K ? ? Y: 1
r++
C F ti?'4Yr?O

s
4
L
r
Xx

* 1
MN SCALE 1:24 OOp _
0
CN
...00 0 1000 p0pp
1 3000 4000 --- 1 M
5 5000 6000 7000 FEET
124 MILS 1.26• --'_.'•_- 0 -- '.`.-----?
I KILOMETER
25ait_S CONTOUR
INTERVAL 10 FEET
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929
INTO AND 1987 MAGNETIC NOaTT,' I - WAKE FOREST QUADRANGLE
INATION AT CENTER Or SNEFT NORTH CAROLINA-WAKE CO.
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
NE/4 RAE.E1G11 15' QUADRANGLE
1/?S
1

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Q
?EHNF:?L
September 23, 1997
Wake County
DWQ Project # 961148
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. Danny Colton
1802 Bright Road
Suite 320
Landover, MD 20785
Dear Mr. Colton:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to fill and
excavate in 03024 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose of Wakefield subdivision in Raleigh, NC,
as you described in your application dated 20 December 19%, 31 January 1997, 20 May 1997 and August
28, 1997. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water
Quality Certification Numbers 3101, 3103 and 3108. These certifications allow you to use Nationwide
Permit Numbers 12,14 and 26 when it is issued by the Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should get
any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited
to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed
regulations. This approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless
otherwise specified in the General Certification. This certification replaces the one issued on May 23,
1997.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except
as modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a
new application. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre,
compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this
approval to bevalid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional
conditions listed below.
Deed restrictions, conservation easements or similar mechanisms shall be placed in all lots with
remaining jurisdictional wetlands to prevent future fill within 30 days of the date of this letter. A stream
mitigation plan to compensate for the 481 linear feet of stream impacts shall be submitted to DWQ
within 6 weeks of this letter. Otherwise, mitigation requirements can be satisfied by participating in the
Wetland Restoration Program within 6 weeks of this letter. The wetlands at crossing #1 for Falls of the
Neuse Road shall be left in their current vegetative condition. An additional 401 Certification will be
required for the remainder of the site (i.e. commercial properties). A small tributary adjacent to the
proposed Neuse River bridge crossing should be avoided. Deed restrictions, conservation easements or
similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining jurisdictional wetlands to prevent future
fill within 30 days of the date of this letter.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification for the additional crossing approved by this
modified certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date
that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which conforms to Chapter
Division of Water Quality - Environmental Sciences Branch
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
FAX # [phone]

Page`
DWQ Project #961148
September 22, 1997
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Boa 27447,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for
a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Feld Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Mdse Ortosky; S&EC 2' -
Central Files

n How r Jr. P.E.
961148dtr

1\ \1 ` ` `\\ ` 1,_ \ ?,
t? . ?, ?, ?? o ? 1 oy _ 7"',
r
I I Typical Blockage Removal/Restoration Sint Potential Pond Remova estoration Site y ,
IVII)
Typical Road Crossing Remova l/Restoration
\ :, \
1
a
U LT
OAK
\` \ T ical Streambank Stabilization Sites 0.9 ?
245-U'S
-3-97 Wakefield Check Plot
From 6
1 \ ' ?\ ` ;? - lr b Withers and Ravenel
l
1 ,
--Y J
Typical Actively Eroding Stream Banks on First Order Streams

r
? ?r 5r
• .1 ?a i;
?? 1bt I"f 1} ?;'
y .. LYF :.. ?trtN..
Typical Farm Road Channel Crossing
i! ,% -
"Blow-out" of Streambanks Below Farm Road Crossing
Typical Section of Stream Channel Blocked by Trees and Stumps
(looking upstream)
2?? S r*ec,
? = 100

170 S
/0
- ?7
F
ski, (' -

17
?= 927' ? ??
Intent
This concept stream mitigation plan is being proposed in response to planned
impacts to 481 linear feet of stream channel in the Wakefield development.
These impacts result from road crossings, cart paths, sewer and irrigation lines.
The intent of the mitigation effort will be to restore or enhance 481 linear feet of
stream channel on the Wakefield site.
A number of opportunities exist to enhance channels on site where erosion is
actively degrading the streambank. There are also a few sites where stream
restoration is possible by removal of an old farm road crossing and in one case
the opportunity exists to remove an old farm pond and restore the preexisting
channel.
It is important to note that stream stabilization is planned on several sections of
channel which are to be cleared as result of fairway construction for the golf
course. Stabilization, enhancement, and restoration of 1750 linear feet of channel
is described in the Wetland Restoration Plan, Clear-only Areas, Wakefield Golf
Course, May 1997 prepared by Soil and Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Significant portions of that 1750 linear feet are areas which are presently
degraded and are planned to be stabilized and restored. The 481 linear feet of
stream mitigation proposed in this concept plan is in addition to that effort.
It is the intent of this concept plan to describe areas which are typical target
restoration sites. The actual sites will located and described in detail in the
detailed mitigation plan which will follow this concept plan.
Target Restoration Sites
The typical degraded stream site is a section of streambank where there is
significant ongoing erosion which would likely be intensified by increased
runoff from a developed watershed. These sites would benefit from stabilization
and, in places, reconfiguration of the channel. Preference would be given to sites
on those first order channels which begin and end on the site. These sections
would likely respond most favorably to restoration (easier to stabilize create
habitat within) and their stabilization would result in greater resource and
property protection per dollar invested than a high-flow, high-bank channel
section within the larger floodplain of Richland Creek.
There are a few road crossings associated with the former farm which may be
removed and the 30' - 40' section restored to natural topography and vegetation.
Also there is one pond on site which is in need of repair and could possibly be
removed. This would allow replacement of the original channel (likely now
silted in) and vegetation.
There may be other appropriate sites on the overall tract which may researched
during preparation of the detailed plan.
The accompanying site photos (taken 6-11-97) are typical of potential restoration
sites in and around the golf course area. The accompanying site map indicates
the location of these and other potential sites.
Methodology
The goals of stream restoration will be to: 1) stabilize the channel, 2) augment
riparian cover and, 3) enhance instream habitat structure.
Techniques for stabilization would involve re-grading of steep banks and
application of bioengineering techniques (particularly adapted to the smaller
streams) such as; 1) root wad revetments, 2) "live-staking", 3) coir log
revetments, 4) "A" jacks, log crib, or native stone revetments. See stabilization
techniques concepts sketches.
Augmentation of riparian cover would be accomplished by planting of various
shrub species (willow, alder, viburnum, silky dogwood, etc) in and around the
restored/ stabilized channel sections.
Enhancement of stream habitat (riffle-pool complexes, overhead cover, in-
stream structural complexity, etc.) could be accomplished by employing log
check dams, stone wing deflectors, native stone clusters, and lunkers as
appropriate.
Where no natural channel exists (road crossings, dam, etc.) the existing fill and
structure (culvert pipes, stone, etc.) could be removed and a natural channel
configuration (similar to that above and below the fill) could be graded into the
previously covered site. The new channel would then be stabilized in the
manners described above.
0 ee rt-1, I? A
10
r ?I
li?e- wiI?O") st a1? "
l??J? c r I
Carr VYl ?
C.,,,1l olo &'a?e5 _

Lilac'
1i-ai-I'l/e, 5

? v`(?e r?-ai wti
?? Cod ?` ?Lt?`I I rYt
G??Lr Ia??
can 7+s
ha&TlaT can ? ar??"r mn ??s
io
c.? t?? i Pif l o o rs G 1 e-4a ? °° I J
. T l •.
?W l
?5-?ytC?G?V`s ?ar X15
Val

vN, c??r c v;? r
? 5
To
Date 3

WHILE
M 7e-no fq
0 AM
Time /9'.ro p
PM
YOU WERE OUT
of 116h hm IL 40/ - S
Phone () $99- 3??g
Area Code Number Extension
TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT
RETURNED YOUR CALL
Message ?P?'?riy TM?u-?/.?7?

Operator

O AMPAD REORDER
`?PNND EFFICIENCY- #23-006
oQ? 'eld ?
ro?o-
Afq
p p6.? )40 t-

40q
Y'OQ Ore ipe? #-J," WIb 1 µ+--VJ&-cam'

LL
CL
an\w?)
l c?J Va4 covme c?\J IL ,
*
n
,S,:Pw ?
f p0.?

Concept Stream Mitigation Plan
June 12, 1997
by
Soil and Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Prepared in response to mitigation needs as a result of
stream impacts on Wakefield Development, Wake County, NC.
For concept approval only.
RECE/VE')
Jul 1 1199,
E4IRONMENrq USCI?'IyCES

NC DEM WU ENVSI l r- ax : y1 y- May 14 J f r . u l / l1J
UV ? 1.
'' I NIA`I 2
,-
Qs 4l,
DEts';•ID . 1p9GCR?5 A=XON ID
iATIOI DIE•;'pSRi'iIT?,RE tJEST D (PROVIDE NRT:oNoPID.s. P
-P. co-'-STRx7CTIaN KOTIFICATION APPLICATION
'OR 2dATI;CNWIDE;:'FERITS;. THAT 1EQXJIRE:
l
. 2a' ??L*c.7?z=o?r• Veit see?zrs? •ans r?xTt?=ca?saoH
31 l7CtpiDZwLZ`LOat`•11IT$ T NC D19ZSICH O? C=M=AL
Mm. T - *0Rx%%2=; .A=DtO!;..{:x Rx.. or ma3 COMPLETIL Fcpjt To. TSR•' A"pl?01?RzATE :
FIE:Z.D :StSF$'TCE O ":TSE CCAI?S: aP' ENQnsrr?e csim AG CY 7?DDRT'SSES ET) . SEVEN
(?.) CQPIES..;SAOEQ gE'.SE.t3T.:TO-THE N.C. DSVISIO1fOF E1+7V2ROIr'li EI?T¢BEASl t?iriAGclENT
{ SEE;.AG?:t?TCY riDbRE93 3 SHEET) 2r 32? PRINT .
W.a4e'field' Development Company;
OWNERS
2MAILING.' D ESS :' 18!QZ Rrightseat Road, Suite 320, Landover; Maryland 20785
Wakefield Plantation
- - -; __ r ___`, SVH.aIVYSZON NAME:
CITY, Raleigh SATE: N.C. ZIP CODE;
P.Rr,SJEGT`•:;TiCCAfi'St; f .ADDECES INCLIIDING SII30IVISI00 NAi'?E (IF DIFE'ERE14T PRc?M
?1dAII:I?,Cr<,ADD?Sg??:ABCIVE? s ` ? .
3 :: T.LEPi'iQNE 1Qt1i?ER. (FIOME): i (WORT{)
PLZCABZ; :AG DTT;'S ?j4RME-•`oa RESPONSIBLE a RPORATE OE£ICIAL? AACRESS,;
PHONE ;NUI?lBER• rai.g A ..1i-ombq, Hlunton & Willia Box 1.09,
Releigl?. N X27602 g-19-899-.3032 (0); 919-833-63t2 (fax) ; cbromby@hunton. com
cop.Y OF QSGS 'TOPOGRAPHIC
aR C2TY': Raleigh

t
x NOW

NL DEM WU LEWSLI Tax May 14 'yJ 1!)_U3 F. U4nJ5
I
],4 ,: 5'1"ATE 'R1"..ASCNS WHY IT S,.. BELIEVED THAT 2H=3 ACTIVITY .MV
;ST
8ECARRIED '
OQT IN TiFETLAIIDS : ( INCLUDE ANY MEASCIMS TAKEN TO MIMIC ZE : WETLAND
p gj , Cunsarbctzon of: subdivision. tibme?' and Anf'?a'strue't6ip. aiill act
w tlancs to a m-nbr ? dekree%,-' e:, number, -of :glades -oa: ,the= site . Wetlands impacts
have been' reduce,. .... .,. .' .. , .... .'?.: .. .' ,._.?_? .
35. YOU ARE RE(?QIRED TO COi3'ACT 'THE If ANI? W ZDLl'FFZ.'•SERVICE
. . : .
(ETSFWS )` &i3D/C?1 N1kTYONAIk MARINE. FISHERIES S ERIVICE . (Ar'MFS'j • t'.SEE AGENCY m. 1.
ADDRESSES r SK ET.1 REGA RING THE.. AE5E,NCE of .14INY...E'EDERALI,Y Z ssED ..OR
PROP05ED -FOR =LI;$TING_.ENDAI7GERED OR T.tiREATEN£?D SPECIES: OA CRITICAL HABITAT
IN' TrIE TsM.*CT. AREA . HAT.:I k`L ...BE -AFFECTED I
CONTACTED (ATTACH RESPONSES
:t'6 .oU ittt? .Ta cottncT' TFE sTATIr' H=sTO?uc .:ESEATION OFFICER
:('3FFP0) . (SEE`>' ENC C• :ADDRESSES .SFLET): REGARDING .THE' PRESENCE :OF; HISTORIC
PAO EATIES.: t ..T?tE P0=T :1?REA..WHICH• .MA?G• BE.A?'F'EC.1;ED•. -BY, _THE 'PROPOSED :.
: :??oisres? bATS..cONTStC1rED, -• •
:a.
.17'. DOES TH?'r PROJE IN LVE. -AN: EXPENDI•TIIAE?••.or.. POSLZC.. rdNDS •.,bR..THE USE OF
pUeL'LC ' ESTATE.). S.A2fD? .
1'.-.NO. W TO is)
a« _:22% jS&g DOE3 lXE`.':PlOJE : Rl 2.QU E :F.. PAPATIgN: ;O;F AN ;E..TZRONMENTAL
DOCISEIT ':PUR9?tJllslTr T!' ::'!!1£ REQDiREMENTS` OF S'HE' NORTH 1;CARdL2NA:' IRONMENTAh :
b. IF X$S-.. IfA3 '. THE DOCIIMEl?T ; BEE14 - RM. MD Tn0.V9H THE', NORTH CAROLM
DEPARTMENT`0F..•ADMIN'IS.TRATIQN'STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?'
ES' (.':;::NO::..? (•? ,
:Y
IF &3*itt to o 'IS:F YES, 'TIfEN. SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCMONT.ATION • FROM THE .
STATE :CLFAR283HCGSE...TQ' BIVTSL4N:.. OF ENVSRONMEq' T14L.,,, NAG£MEbtT.•:.REGAR,DING: '
...Cox P7?YAIfCE, `WI'TH' T1?IE DIORTH `.CPIROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POI ICY,
QV£S.TIOATS REt3u•WING THE` STATE. CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS' SHOULD, BE
DIRECTEx7 TO JV3 ; tCHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE: CLEARgNGHatJSE; NORTH
CARGLY(A DEPItTtrlENT 4F ADMIIISTRATZf3N, 116 WEST JONES, STREET, RALEIGH, '
NORTH ' cAROLIN7? 2760 108 .0?3TELEPHONE (919) ?33-6. 69'.
y:. 4

WAKEFIELD PLANTATION
WETLANDS IMPACT TABLE
Road Impacts
Key Area Cross
[NWP 141 Length
[NWP 261 Location
1 0.0180 ac. 4.9 ft. 160.0 ft. Falls of Neuse Rd.
2 0.0043 ac. 3.0 ft. 62.0 ft. Falls of Neuse Rd.
3 0.0950 ac. 52 ft. 79.0 ft. Plantation Drive
4 0 0 0 Plantation Drive
5 0 0 0 Plantation Drive
6 0 0 0 Plantation Drive
7 0 0 0 Minor Thorofare
8 0.0060 ac. 5.2 ft. 50.0 ft. SFD-6
9 0.0046 ac. 3.0 ft. 67.0 ft.- Tract 3
10 0.0073 ac. 5.0 ft. 63.0 ft. Minor Thorofare
RA-E&E: \CA M W AKEPMRESIDL.TB2

WAKEFIELD PLANTATION
WETLANDS IMPACT TABLE
Sewer Impacts
Key Wetland Impact
[NWP 12] Wetland Loss
[NWP 261 Location
1 0.1370 ac. [manhole] Richland Creek Sewer
2 0.0223 ac. 0 Richland Creek Sewer
3 0.1252 ac. [manhole] Richland Creek Sewer
4 0.0003 ac. 0 Richland Creek Sewer
[10] 0.0028 ac. 0 Richland Creek Sewer
[11] 0.0003 ac. 0 Richland Creek Sewer
[12] 0.0260 ac. 0 Richland Creek Sewer
[13] 0.0040 ac. 0 Richland Creek Sewer
[14] 0.0117 ac. 0 Richland Creek Sewer
[15] 0.0079 ac. 0 Richland Creek Sewer
[16] 0.0175 ac. 0 Richland Creek Sewer
=[17] 0.0049 ac. 0 Richland Creek Sewer
Water Intake Line -- Richland Creek
Impact 100 square feet of waters of United States (0.023 ac.)
(Location within Richland Creek yet to be determined)
RA-E&E:\CAB\W AKEFLD\RESIDL.TB2
Z91*1alm\4'139HVM\81+ VHTs-V11
'Jv 609'i' 1 n;OI
09S' i 8
6t,0'0 L
'a'9081'0 9
08Z'0 S
a? 0£6'0 t
a? OZZ'0 £
OZS'0 z
OLL'0 I
?aad 'oN Laid JEOID
(fo pnvu pun amfins punt aAogv im)
sua.V SiuO juai3 -- asanoa 3toO
arIavs lavcl II sc[mvr am
NOISVJLKv'Id (IrlmaxvtA

WAKEFIELD PLANTATION
WETLANDS IMPACT TABLE
NATIONWIDE PERMIT 26 SUMMARY
Total acres of waters lost to road construction: 0.1352
Total acres of waters lost to sewer construction: -0-
Total acres of waters lost to site activity: 0.1582
Total acres of waters of the United States lost: 0.1582
Total linear feet of waters filled: 481 ft.
NATIONWIDE PERMIT 14 SUMMARY
Crossing 1
Total acres of fill in waters of the United States: 0.0180 ac.
Total linear feet of fill special aquatic sites: 4.9 ft.
Crossing 2
Total acres of fill in waters of the United States: 0.0043 ac.
Total linear feet of fill special aquatic sites: 3.0 ft.
Crossing 3
Total acres of fill in waters of the United States: 0.0950 ac.
Total linear feet of fill special aquatic sites: 5.2 ft.
Crossing 4
Total acres of fill in waters of the United States: -0-
Total linear feet of fill special aquatic sites: -0-
RA-E&E:\CAR WAKEFLMES[DL.TB2
Crossing 5
Total acres of fill in waters of the United States: -0-
Total linear feet of fill special aquatic sites: -0-
Crossing 6
Total acres of fill in waters of the United States: -0-
Total linear feet of fill special aquatic sites: -0-
Crossing 7
Total acres of fill in waters of the United States: -0-
Total linear feet of fill special aquatic sites: -0-
Crossing 8
Total acres of fill in waters of the United States: 0.0060 ac.
Total linear feet of fill special aquatic sites: 5.2 ft.
Crossing 9
Total acres of fill in waters of the United States: 0.0046 ac.
Total linear feet of fill special aquatic sites: 3.0 ft.
Crossing 10
Total acres of fill in waters of the United States: 0.0073 ac.
Total linear feet of fill special aquatic sites: 5.0 ft.
RA-E&E:\CAB\W AKEFLD\RESIDL.TB2

V I-
i d
g.
W
W Q ?.
O s X11
Mi
q24-
N ?
t?
,3
?I
: .::J .
Z ::::::::::::::
Hill
j? V
bC d
44 a
All

yc:

i?
4
l
? e

1

N '
N
1C
IN

V
()ZZ

/ WATERS OF aVED
IN EKED ME I,
Czz
\ Wakefield Project
w Falls of Neese
\ ' Blvd.
Wetland Crossing
\\ _,? ;\ \?;,\ Crossing 1
Scale 1" = 50' ??
?1
/ '' 11 ` \ 1,,11\• l\ l \ '•'?`? ` '\ ? /\
1
2? .
yam'.` ?. __i
2ES
.1,

Wakefield Project
Residential Street
Tract-4
1?etland Crossing
Crossing 2 ,?
Scale 1" = 50' -'Z
I r
G

ti
v
i
i
0? .

i ? Cy

0

Wakefield Project
Plantation Drive
Wetland Crossing
Crossing 3
?? - z
Scale 1 - 50'
??

0pG
i
WETLANDS
0
0
s ?,z
N
0
Wakefield Project
Plantation Drive
Wetland Crossing
Crossing 5
Scale V -- 50'

901

0

Wakefield Project
Commercial Collector
Street,
Wetland Crossing
\\1 ??\ Crossing Sale 1 -- 50' ??_
eve
WA TFR.S F U.
? ? 1 r a
// r c,1
X Q)
i ? ?•? 1, ?,

JJ

1
tv
I`

/
/I
?l
Wakefield Project
Residential Street
SFD-6
Wetland Crossing
Crossing 8
Scale 1u = 50' ?i?Z

,05 =?? aEe?s
?•. 6UtSSO.1 ,
6uissoJO puellam
E-10BJJ
Iaajls Jelluapisau
1091oJd REa!a?fef?
n
330

?\: ? it ?j? ?' h•a ?i ?
?111II11
?I

1 ?
i it
i' / ;
'APR-17-1997 08:22 FROM WITHERS & RAVENEL TO a-soy=utt r•e?
f
WE ANDS ;?.
N-
??? •?,~~
1
?a
DISTURBED
AREA-318 SF ' •CROSSING IG
LENGTH=63' i }
i!
4 ?
t t ENrv4MfK do SURVEYING
1 WITHERS & RAVENEL
1 ` WV t ;Arw . Aac.
111 M=Kwwn 0*0
Cary, N. C. 27311
t ; 1 F ar -ae
l WAKERELD TRACT• 6
1 WMANOS JUPAC*
0A;E:4 SCALE.J! ZD
ti• t>g t'1'•'
1
TOTAL P.02

11.1.
i
A.REA Or li1r ----? ??
p.131m AG.

O tz
? o
J
i
l--
21"
J?
v
SLOPE 0.10
i l 21" PVG
L-?
. SLOP = 0.10 ?o .
20" D.I.
N Wakefield Project
Richland Creek Sewer
Crossing 1
Scale 1' = 50'

N
0
/ N
v

I
4-
JLI.
i
1 /
LENGTH 13102
._Qt"C OAa, %
`.
21" °VC
l-?
LENGTH 156-20 LENGTH 285.40
I-?" 20" D.i. t17
Wakefield Project
N
Richland Creek Sewer
Crossing 2
Scale 1' = 50'

-- ? z s
......... "
\•WATERS

j
'AREA C= It, IP?
6.1252 AC.
_ L
i

1 /
1 ?
Io" D.I. mII LE?GT-! Ici.55 SLG°= J.15 °r,

Wakefield Project
Richland Creek Sewer
Crossing 3
Scale 1' = 50'

A I,- A I- M\=..: \-? \
\ r'
C
1

SLOPE 0.22 9.
12" PvC

I,- -
LONG--T' 36o.5-i
Wakefield Project
Richland Creek Sewer
Crossing 4
Scale T SO'

1-1

1 `
24" D.I.
SLOPE

LENGTW 400.00

INDEPENDENT PROJECT
Richland Creek Sewer
Crossing 10
Scale T = 50'

/ m
1

-k
AREA OF IMPACT
02003 AC.
a

q, 24110.1.
a

LENG-TN 221.11 SLOPE 0.08 9- 24" D.I.
N Independent Project
Richland Creek Sewer
Crossing 11
Scale 1' = 50'
)Z,
nO
?LU
W
ulz
z}

i
LENGTH 133.06
SLOPE 008 qo
24" PVC

LEWGTH 318B3
SLOPE 0.08 %
N Independent Project
Richland Creek Sewer
Crossing 12
Scale 1' = 50'
r

1
\ I i
i
i
N
? a
•v
t

I

.OPE 0D8 90 24" PVC LEWSTN 241J4
SLOPE 008 90 24" PVC

Independent Project
N
Richland Creek Sewer
Crossing 13
Scale T a 50'

M,
\NX

\. I
\I/
\I
i
TOPE 0.03 90
SLOPI
N Independent Project
Richland Creek Sewer
Crossing 14
Scale 1' -- 50'

N
a
v
W
41 LF. OF

R
N
\ -A \ I C U. li1CVv IIVLT/?

5% 24" D.I.
. V*TW 141.92
?PE 0.08 qo
24" D.I.
N
LD*TW 184.05 SLOPE 0-08 % ffl2
Independent Project
Richland Creek Sewer
Crossing 15
Scale 1' = 50'

13 4.05 SLOPE 0.08 %
4" D.I

i

LE`r-M4 25133
SLOPE-0.10%
20" D.I.
N Independent Project
Richland Creek Sewer
Crossing 16
Scale 1' = 50'

,51"VZ,
1 N
N
• _ I
,a
N
N
N \ WW
T CD
o?
N \ O
O
V O
NO,
W W
N
O O
N ?
2gA OP IMPACT
0 G.
NNE
AREA OP4M GT
-0018 AC.. _ °
N
_ y
f?-
LEWGTH 14328
SLOPE 0.10 qo
21" PVC

LEWGTW 29320
SLOPE 0.10 %
Independent Project
N
Richland Creek Sewer
Crossing 17
Scale 1' = 50'
w? WITHERS & RAVENEL Engineering & Surveying
WITHER 111 MacKenan?Driivee • Cary, N.lC 227511 r'
JOB NAME ,?'Q?y'??`?`? '?????7? 1???? COMPUTED BY
SUBJECT "•"?`? '?'"?? ???"?-? CHECKEDBY
Sod 6p 1l
p???-? - ?.qs m G.0

(24-P i

Cl?- emu-
+ looM 5c_

Fi)4kh'SI1 tb
JOB NO.
SHEET NO.
DATE
FEA -- lJr? 4.1 1111 WIC-w y- cz ^ v, % .
r ? i i us
1= r f i.; fit \ CI U i
LUI
Y'
c7 U
03 P 03
_ ftI? /
Vd
Q < r i i
i
!t1
of a
WI < J / 1i111.
UJI
.A 100
? i
' s
I
U '
I '
?y v/J O J t
e?0' rR Z:
ti
l O

•? b a J013 NO.
:'.
:O
• tt<t<tt ' (i i ...':1 C. '.i' Or;- .,c Cary N l .. .. 7 j i i ???-- --- -'---.
On-E
COMPUTED BY
$tJE3.1°:?.:' ___ ?"_'? _`-"?2i •?'?}?n!1I?(J UN?.. .J lt?V7? ICQ.G?J? CHI_CKED9y
C,EoSS ? •-l?S
?`?D. ?C1?tom
C
TVZA
sirw?? (arz.sr?
ASfi{ °c P Ai'+
S'a^C 6Pr5c
- _ .(II ?•(? l = t ,n 111 ?ti ? r.. ..
ill- ? ? 1t?
-------------
CUSS SEcit.a-?
-to W,011;
'1 l ?t
r- "Cqz-
"Ltt,l ve ?

I
I?
loll"
i
ENGINEERING do SUPVEYINC -
7
WITHERS RAVENEL
III A/acKenan Orfve
Cary, N.C. Z7511
FAX : M-4.67 6=
r=v??\\' '? - WAKEFIELD TRACT_
\ wETLANOs «vrPaCr
0A rr. 31 SCAL
1 y \ \
I

/%

1 `7
CAZTI«
?ssca ? µa
1

0
! C?

i _?--

s
r

CEO S$ t t?1C? 1'uJ . _
,> = ' ,/ ?.. .• , 1, ?,

j it `''
ENCINEERIN(i 4 tila:vrnr•tr
WITHERS & RA VENEL
&grn-&*Hng & sulvarfnq, JIm.
1 ! f MacKenan Or.'re
Cor. H.C. 7%511
p.,rw( . ?t9-j69-mw

wAKEFIELD TRACT

AMEBA
NN
ENCINEEPING & SUPVEYINC
WITHERS RA VEHEL
Engln4wYng & &rwrln9, lrrc• \-?
Ill A/acKenan Dr1ve
Cary, K.C. 275II
FAX : ? : 919-169-,SS10
f.(X 919-167-60Y1Q
WAKEFIELD TRACT _
\\ Wr rLANOS IMPACT
? OarE: L+ 1 SCALE.

1

C?QT C¢osSt???! -
( R.tz.t.?a;?? ? ;
ua55? No . 3
a
?L
E•crt ???'r• ?;.•

i
c
f .

Owr-/tF,e?i
4

•? i

-? ? ? - - ' ? • ?:. mss:;. ? ?
IN: - v
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING , - - - - ' - ' + _ -
WWII H RS RA VC NEL
I ..•;, fnyln«rfiry & SurrVyirry, /nc•
f ! f VocKsnon Ddve
?- Cory, N.C. 27511
?-? Pt.Vhf 9f9-t69-SS?O ?.
f1A? WAKEFIELD TRAC1'___._
WE LANos ijupACr
f o..rg 1?1 scACr _fa _? ?! ? i •
I y 1 0

- ? o / i 1 r I i
r
r ! 1
C uzr-2 C,?,Jk4
0•ZZ?=L•
%
:? - -
ENC!NEERIr!C & SuRVEYir!C
?• ! ', ----- WITH RS RA VFNc
I I / fnQ(nsvrfn? 't Surwyfng, Inc
\ ,' ill uocKenQn Orfve - i
Cori, N.C. 27511
PHONE . 419-469-MJO i
rAY :gig-467-&W
WAKEFIELD TRACT
`? .' ..,:? 3/lilt] ;r?•uC (oo i
? ^ e
-(IT
L
J

car/???
(,?aSsl,? t? .
.S
z
i r.-
1
ENGINEERING ?c SURVEYING
WITHERS L1: RA VENEL
Envfn.rwfnp & Surm7fr g Inc. -J
l ^ ?? III Macxdnan Ohre
\? 'r Cary, X.C. 2;511
WAKEPELD TRACT
i ` I 1 1 ?1?
I ?
I ' 1 1 1
I /
i 1
a
r , ?.
J ?HIX;
I
Ir.

Jul 0.C13 k?.
link A
r
/ ENGINEERING et SURVEYING
T
1 A V1rNEL
4.41,
. ¦ •
-f

? '' .i ?'.\, ?y`??. FnylF,wrfny ? suFrs?rt¢. Ana •` ?
`1 1'f , `' 1 r 1 111 AlacKonan Orfve
r. ' \ \ Cary, N.C. 27511
l ? ; ! 1 Pl,d/C : 9l?1S9-SSla
. /' / i i •'I , / / ? 1 r i 1 1\ FAY : 914-467-6nGS \ \ '
I ? \ I
WAKEFIELD TR ACT__ \ I
wETUNOS IMPACT \
' `? I1.rt1' 3 Z? _2j SCALE: 147 _ \\.

O
KJ ? J j
2f, ".
A?

.
,I r r r r ? /'?/ ? .may-
?l
\1
d
J G fQ. ENGINEERING do SURVEYING
WITHERS RA VENEL
AV 111 UacKdnan Orrve
i 1 I u. ( .z.
U r! t r• ;;fie Cary, N.C. Z7511 `
fAX : 9JP-447-60M
J
/ - WAKERaD TRACT
I WETLANOS lA4PACT
I _ U.I rE. 3.11 SCat. E 10-
l• ? /I: ? n ? \O i
4 41 r , - f

04)35t-6 8 /

?t Ai

I
.

-l!

1)jllf?ll W/MERS RAVENEL rrgfn. t & sing, Inc 1I1 MacKenan Ort"
Cary, N.C. 2751 t
? ? ?_?r? P'r0+`E : 9f9-X69-1317 ?r
?,? l 1 ' ;?? ?- PAX :419-sS7-6GY??
WAKEFIELD TRACT
? _? wETLat:pS ?MPaCf
C?

11 I-e

V

it
OHI
ENCINEERNC do SURVEYING
?=' -? - - -
?tjll??`•;'? / 1 1 / ???1 „ WITHERS & RAVEN L
Engln~*7g & Surv*ng, Ir,
111 MacKenan Orive
?r U' E ??ti uZL,
. J! ?, C ? Cary. N.C. 27511

WAKEFIELD TRACT,_ WETLANDS IWPACr
narE 34Z7`_U SCAtC 100.. `

LZ
1

F .•
r ? .•1 p
it
i
1.J G•
Q-Epco _ ONt?
- -? / WITHERS & RA VENEL
Engfn"Hng Sur myfrt? Inc /
/ i I I NcclCercn Orfve
? Cory, Y. C. zi5/1 ./?
WAKEFIELD TRACT
wETLAnOS IMPAc 1 )
it At foo t
L`\ ? ,? ?_? ? '?? i ? ? ? `?11? X1\1. ? ! ? •.?\ \I`,I'

F ?

F !t

\ X
V

r_
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
1
?"•:'= c rat ? ? '? 1 i ? ? ! i
t
WITHERS RA VE "
??? '\?'? Eny!?wrfnp & Surwylrr9, Inc.
\\ I l l WacKenan Orfve
?• \ \\\ \\? Cary, N.C. [751i
FAAr :: Off(-4467-6T0[0744
wc!L ADS IAAPArf
/ ` -
?, " t
31 z,-jjlj
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
BRUSSELS, BELGIUM
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
HONG KONG
KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE
McLEAN, VIRGINIA
CRAIG A. BROMBY
INTERNET MAIL: cbrombyahunton.com
HUNTON & WILLIAMS
P. O. Box 109
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602
TELEPHONE [phone]
FACSIMILE [phone]
[phone]
May 20, 1997
Eric Galamb
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
RE: Wakefield Plantation Project
Dear Mr. Galamb:
NEW YORK, NEW YORK
NORFOLK, VIRGINIA
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
WARSAW,POLAND
WASHINGTON, D.C.
FILE No.: 52614.000002
DIRECT DIAL: [phone]
RECEIVED
M AY ; 1997.:
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
-,.1
Thank you for your prompt review of the application for 401 Certification submitted by
Wakefield Developers, LLC, for its Wakefield Plantation project. You raised a number of
questions to which I am responding in this letter.
1. Will individual lots with wetlands be subject to fill activity and have those impacts been
accounted for in the application?
The present plans for developing the residential use portions of the project call for no fill
activity on individual lots. If any lot does require fill at a future time, the lot owner would be
responsible for permitting and mitigation. If individual deed restrictions are required to
ensure that responsibility is met, the applicant will provide such deed restrictions as lots are
finally platted and sold.
2. Will the wetlands avoided by use of a median in the roadway denoted as New Falls of the
Neuse Road remain in its current vegetated state or are there plans to modify the wetland?
The segment of New Falls of the Neuse Road was expressly designed with a median strip to
avoid impact on the wetland around which it passes. Plans call for leaving the wetland in its
current vegetated state. However, in conjunction with the plans to design a planting plan to
convert to emergent wetlands the presently forested wetlands occurring on the golf course,
Q ild `?u?uM aufUm •D
uo:RnS •g mn1111A1
uoTIOD •I JORMQ :o
U4:HVD
?Cquiojg[•V Srezo
.wwy? ;Dl? ? "?
`sinoX Aloiaouis
•loofozd aill jo om4eaj aailjo Aue io sosuodsoi
osailj fuipmSoi suoilsonb Niue anvil noAjj aui llvo of aag laaj oseald •uoi?eoilddr sigl uo aui pue
u01103 •zWgllAx Suileap ui fsolmoo moA zo3 noA 31uv ls, •spaaooid loofoid slgl se f4jImb zairm
jo uoisiniQ 3111 pine nOA ql!M guplaonn of p cAuoj s3lool `D'IZ `szadolanaQ pIOIJ03 Ak
•loofozd aill Aq palouduii oq Illm jwill paq urea.4s ai11 ui sosn oill
jo uolWsllTTU of gummijod s}laam xis uiLl m weld uoi?L'ST?iui v 1iuzgns of sueld lueoilddu oqj,
i sazlznzlov app,
,fq palovduiz aq ll!m lvgl uivails fb laaf.svauzl Igp, aql aiv.;?zlzu[ of 2uisodoid juvallddv aql sI •£
•puellom vane Umpow aill .ioj
weld 2uiluvid v u2isop osle `fqilen6 jolvAk jo uoisiniQ aill Xq paimboijj `plnoo lueoildde ailj
Z oftcl
L6hi 1 6 AV qumpo oug "I A Cl SIKVI'I-IIM 39 NO.LN1IH

MEMO
DATE: 7
TO: SUBJECT:
4
Frr
WL
?s 4
Ca I na Depart ent of nvi ronment
Health, and Natural Resources printed on ecyeiedF er
/' A?Q11AMN?"? JJ eA?
HUNTON 8c WILLIAMS
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
BRUSSELS, BELGIUM
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
HONG KONG
KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE
MCLEAN, VIRGINIA
CRAIG A. BROMBY
INTERNET MAIL: [e-mail]
G. Wayne Wright, Ph.D.
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Department of the Army
Corps of Engineers, Wilmington. District
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28401-1890
John R. Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
RE: Wakefield Plantation
Dear Dr. Wright and Mr. Dorney:

NEW YORK, NEW YORK
NORFOLK, VIRGINIA
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
WARSAW,POLAND
WASHINGTON, D.C.
FILE No.: 52614.000002
DIRECT DIAL: [phone]
Enclosed please find a Pre-Construction Notification Application for work at the
Wakefield Plantation project in Raleigh, North Carolina. We discussed this project with Corps
of Engineers staff in a meeting on April 14, 1997, and with Water Quality Section staff in a
meeting on April 25, 1997. The wetlands impacts have been significantly reduced as a result of
modifications to sewer line crossings, road crossings, relocation of streets, and the substitution of
arches for the golf cart paths within the golf course. A historical survey has been completed (a
copy of the report will be forwarded as soon as we receive it from the consultant), and a wetlands
planting plan for modified emergent wetlands areas in the golf course has been prepared (a copy
of this plan will also be provided in a subsequent communication). Wakefield Development has
expended significant sums to effect these reductions in impact to wetlands and waters of the
United States. We do not believe that there are any additional reductions that could reasonably
be made in a cost-effective manner that preserve the essential scope and character of the project.
P. O. Box loo
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27602
TELEPHONE [phone]
FACSIMILE [phone]
19191 899-3096
May 19, 1997

HUNTON & WILLIAMS
G. Wayne Wright, Ph.D.
John R. Dorney
May 19, 1997
Page 2
Wakefield Development Company has been refining this project plan since mid-1996.
We believe the result to be an environmentally superior development. We would like to proceed
with construction at the earliest possible time. Given the fact that our impacts are so slight, we
hope that your review can proceed expeditiously. Please feel free to contact me, or the principals
William H. Sutton (919/556-4310) or Daniel I. Colton (301/982-9400), if you have any questions
regarding this submittal.
Thank you for your prompt consideration of this Pre-Construction Notification.
Sincerely yours,
Craig A. romby
CAB:psb
Enclosures
1%
c: Daniel I. Colton (w/encl)
William H. Sutton (w/encl)
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Ja mes 6. Hunt, Jr., G ove mor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
May 13, 1997
Mr. James A. Spangler
Barrett Kays and Associates
Suite 100
224 Fayetteville Street Mall
Raleigh NC 27602-2979
Dear Mr. Spangler:
Subject: Wakefield Project Site Visit, DWQ No. 961148
_x IW
Iq , --T-T 1%
E) EHNFzI
Thank you for your 8 April 1997 letter which discussed the site visit with Mr. Eric Galamb
of my staff at the Wakefield Development site on 18 February 1997. You stated that "Mr.
Galamb was never refused access, hindered or prevented in any way from doing his job". Upon
discussion with Mr. Galamb as well as others present, it is clear that ,you requested that those
present remove their vehicles from behind the gate which y u then proceeded to lock before you
left the site. Given recent events regarding the permitting of this development, including
accompanying Mr. Galamb on another site visit, I trust that this matter will not occur again.
Please call me at 733-1786 if you have any questions.
cc: Eric Galamb
Craig Bromby
ISSierely yours,
R. Dorney
Environmental Sciences Branch - 4401 Reedy Creek Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer SO TO recycle&10% post consumer paper
V 10
?• ' e4l
S /
con Qir?Gw ?t. L ??
S7?19--
VI-P
? G

c
:?- irk I o - -0?
\? T?? 1

. N6?,
"'71JOa-

v?r 4--,,',A,& A4t-
ci << re es??? r 2t-t_l?l
} n j
NAJI W?? ( ((?
® Barrett Kays & Associates
April 8, 1997
Mr. John R. Dorney
Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27607
Re: Wakefield, DWQ #961148
(BKA # 9612019, 9612020, 9612021, 9611002A)
Dear John:
Environmental Sciences
Civil Engineerring
Environmental Engineering
Planning
Landscape Architecture
FAG ??? *1
???
Thank you for your letter dated March 27, 1997 (attached). We appreciate your confirmation of
the status of your review, and your suggestions regarding rip-rap in channels.
However, I would like to comment on your last paragraph. Mr. Galamb was never refused
access, hindered or prevented in any way from doing his job. I merely declined to participate,
on that date, in his inspection activities. In fact, I know, as do the applicants who stayed with
him, that Mr. Galamb remained on the project site after I left.
Sincerely,
BARRETT KAYS & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
s 4ASp`amingger
*r__
Project Manager
Attachment
cc: Craig Bromby;
Danny Colton;
Rick Rowe;
Eric Almeyer, COE;
Eric Galamb, DWQ
224 FAYETTEVILLE STREET MALL
SUITE 100, P.O.BOX 2979
RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27602-2971)
TELEPHONE [phone]
H:\clients\wakefi\memos\jrd0l.doc FACSIMILE 919 8 2 8- 0 3 6 5
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Mr. James Spangler
Barrett Kays and Associates
224 Fayetteville Street Mall
Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27602-2979
Dear Mr. Spangler:
Re: Wakefield Project
Wake County
DWQ Project No. 961148
E:> IF= Fl
March 27, 1997

h ,d ' 4

A pre-application meeting for the Wakefield project was held on December 19, 1996.
On December 20, 1996, we received an application for the road crossings. In
conversations with the Corps of Engineers (COE), your project was deemed incomplete
due to the lack of information on the residential lots and golf course.
Our January 15, 1997 letter stated that the application was not complete due to lack of
information regarding a stormwater plan as well as the wetland impacts for the entire
Wakefield development. On January 31, 1997 we received the document entitled,
"Supporting Documentation for Outstanding Road and Sewer Applications, Wakefield
Area, Raleigh, North Carolina." However this report does not address our concerns about
this project.
On March 20, 1997 the COE has determined that your project does not qualify for
authorization by Nationwide Permits and that an Individual Permit or a modification of the
existing proposal will be required. The COE also has determined that the entire Wakefield
parcel is considered to be one subdivision (residential, commercial, schools and golf
course). Since the Supporting Documentation" is not an application for all impacts
associated with the proposed development, our processing time has not and will not start
until this application is complete, we request again that the entire impacts from the roads,
golf course, subdivision and commercial be included in one application.
It appears from the "Supporting Documentation" that avoidance/minimization options
still exist. Lots are not labeled or numbered. Therefore, we are unable to specifically
identify the areas that we believe that avoidance and minimization efforts can occur. The
present system of placing the impacts on three maps (one for roads, one for sewer, and one
for miscellaneous) is not conducive to discuss alternate designs. Impacts should be shown
on one map with color coding or shading to show the impacts by category.
The DWQ generally recommends against placing rip rap on the stream bottom.
Placement of rip rap on the bottom transfers the energy downstream which usually results
in unstable banks. Therefore unless there is a sound engineering reason to place rip rap on
the substrate, it should be removed from the application.
Division of Water Quality • Environmental Sciences Branch
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • '50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
The DWQ performed a site visit to a number of sites on March 4, 1997. Not all of the
wetland and stream sites were visited. You should contact Mr. Eric Galamb to schedule
another site visit in order to complete our field evaluation.
During the 4 March 1997 site visit, aquatic life was found in the stream that runs
parallel to the proposed relocated Falls of the Neuse Road. Should stream impacts for this
stream or others exceed 150 linear feet, stream mitigation may be needed. Furthermore
stormwater treatment will be required for the commercial properties. These wetland ponds
should be designed so that the wetlands and streams do not dry up.
Wetland mitigation may be required for this project. If wetland impacts exceed one
acre, DWQ will require wetland mitigation. The mitigation plan should be included with
the revised application.
Finally as you are aware, a site visit was scheduled for February 18, 1997. Mr.
Galamb explained the sites he needed to visit as part of the review of the project. You
refused him entry to the site. Please be advised that by refusing access to the site, you
violated NCGS. 143-215.3(a)(2). NCGS 143-215.6(a)(1) states that, " A civil penalty of
not more that ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) may be assessed by the Commission
against any person who refuses access to the Commission or its duly designated
representative to any premises for the purpose of conducting a lawful inspection." If
access is denied to any Water Quality staff for this project or any other, we will make a
recommendation for enforcement. Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Eric
Galamb at 733-1786.
cc: Eric Alsmeyer, COE
Danny Colton
Rick Rowe
Eric Galamb
S' cerel ;
Jo n R. Dorney
Environmental Sciences
® Barrett Ka s & Associates
Y
April 8, 1997
Mr. John R. Dorney
Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27607
Re: Wakefield, DWQ #961148
(BKA # 9612019, 9612020, 9612021, 9611002A)
Dear John:
Civil Engineerring
Environmental Engineering
Planning
Landscape Architecture
11-161,
Thank you for your letter dated March 27, 1997 (attached). We appreciate your confirmation of
the status of your review, and your suggestions regarding rip-rap in channels.
However, I would like to comment on your last paragraph. Mr. Galamb was never refused
access, hindered or prevented in any way from doing his job. I merely declined to participate,
on that date, in his inspection activities. In fact, I know, as do the applicants who stayed with
him, that Mr. Galamb remained on the project site after I left.
Sincerely,
BARRETT KAYS & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
James A. Spangler
Project Manager
Attachment
cc: Craig Bromby;
Danny Colton;
Rick Rowe;
Eric Almeyer, COE;
Eric Galamb, DWQ
224 FAYETTEVILLE STREET MALL
SUITE 100, P.O.BOX 2979
RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27602-2979
TELEPHONE [phone]
H:\clients\wakefi\memos\jrd0l.doe FACSIMILE 919 8 2 8- 0 3 6 5
r r a.
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, T Health and Natural Resources / • •
?IW
IF
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor NNW
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary p E H N F1
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
March 27, 1997
Mr. James Spangler
Barrett Kays and Associates
224 Fayetteville Street Mall
Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27602-2979
Dear Mr. Spangler:
Re: Wakefield Project
Wake County
DWQ Project No. 961148
A pre-application meeting for the Wakefield project was held on December 19, 1996.
On December 20, 1996, we received an application for the road crossings. In
conversations with the Corps of Engineers (COE), your project was deemed incomplete
due to the lack of information on the residential lots and golf course.
Our January 15, 1997 letter stated that the application was not complete due to lack of
information regarding a stormwater plan as well as the wetland impacts for the entire
Wakefield development. On January 31, 1997 we received the document entitled,
"Supporting Documentation for Outstanding Road and Sewer Applications, Wakefield
Area, Raleigh, North Carolina." However this report does not address our concerns about
this project.
On March 20, 1997 the COE has determined that your project does not qualify for
authorization by Nationwide Permits and that an Individual Permit or a modification of the
existing proposal will be required. The COE also has determined that the entire Wakefield
parcel is considered to be one subdivision (residential, commercial, schools and golf
course). Since the Supporting Documentation" is not an application for all impacts
associated with the proposed development, our processing time has not and will not start
until this application is complete, we request again that the entire impacts from the roads,
golf course, subdivision and commercial be included in one application.
It appears from the "Supporting Documentation" that avoidance/minimization options
still exist. Lots are not labeled or numbered. Therefore, we are unable to specifically
identify the areas that we believe that avoidance and minimization efforts can occur. The
present system of placing the impacts on three maps (one for roads, one for sewer, and one
for miscellaneous) is not conducive to discuss alternate designs. Impacts should be shown
on one map with color coding or shading to show the impacts by category.
The DWQ generally recommends against placing rip rap on the stream bottom.
Placement of rip rap on the bottom transfers the energy downstream which usually results
in unstable banks. Therefore unless there is a sound engineering reason to place rip rap on
the substrate, it should be removed from the application.
Division of Water Quality • Environmental Sciences Branch
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
ti
The DWQ performed a site visit to a number of sites on March 4, 1997. Not all of the
wetland and stream sites were visited. You should contact Mr. Eric Galamb to schedule
another site visit in order to complete our field evaluation.
During the 4 March 1997 site visit, aquatic life was found in the stream that runs
parallel to the proposed relocated Falls of the Neuse Road. Should stream impacts for this
stream or others exceed 150 linear feet, stream mitigation may be needed. Furthermore
stormwater treatment will be required for the commercial properties. These wetland ponds
should be designed so that the wetlands and streams do not dry up.
Wetland mitigation may be required for this project. If wetland impacts exceed one
acre, DWQ will require wetland mitigation. The mitigation plan should be included with
the revised application.
Finally as you are aware, a site visit was scheduled for February 18, 1997. Mr.
Galamb explained the sites he needed to visit as part of the review of the project. You
refused him entry to the site. Please be advised that by refusing access to the site, you
violated NCGS 143-215.3(a)(2). NCGS 143-215.6(a)(1) states that, " A civil penalty of
not more that ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) may be assessed by the Commission
against any person who refuses access to the Commission or its duly designated
representative to any premises for the purpose of conducting a lawful inspection." If
access is denied to any Water Quality staff for this project or any other, we will make a
recommendation for enforcement. Should you halve any questions, please contact Mr. Eric
Galamb at 733-1786.
cc: Eric Alsmeyer, COE
Danny Colton
Rick Rowe
Eric Galamb
qn ' re l R,, Dorney
',_-F?.SJM RALEIGH REGULATORY 03.21. 1997 16:19 P.02
aj
March 20, 1997
Regulatory Bzanch
ACTION ID Nos. 199602047, and 199700234 through 199100251
Mr. Daniel. 1. Colton, President
Colton Development, Incorporated
1802 Brightseat Road, Suite 320
Landover, Maryland 20785
Dear Mr. Colton:
On December 20, 1996, your authorized agent, Mr. Jim
Spangler of Barrett Kays and Assoclates, submitted a permit
application, on your behalf and on behalf of Atlantic Real Estate
Incorporation, for Department of the Army (DA) approval to
discharge fill material into 0.56 acre of jurisdictional waters
of the United. States, including wetlands, for the proposed
construction of thoroughfare and collector roads and the
installation of utility lines associated with the Wakefield
Development. This proposed project, involving construction of
residential, commercial and golf course facilities, consists of
approximately 2,400 acres located adjacent to, and below the
headwaters of, the Neuse River and Richland Creek, north of
Raleigh, in Wake County, North Carolina. By letter dated January
17, 1997, I informed you that your application was incomplete as
it did not include complete and accurate information regarding
all jurisdictional activities associated with the project.
In response to my letter of January 17, 1997, your agent
submitted supporting documentation to complete the referenced
perrlit application on January 31, 1997. Based upon our review of
the information regarding jurisdictional inpacts included in your
original application as well as the supporting documentation, my
staff made a determination that the proposed activities would
result in more than minimal adverse environmental effects.
Accordingly, we advised your agent on February 27, 1997, that the
project did not qualify for authorization by Nationwide Permits
(NWPs) and that you could either apply for an individual DA
permit or modify your proposal to minimize jurisdictional impacts
and reapply for NWP authorization. At your agent's request, a
meeting was held on March 10, 1997, to discuss our decision to
exert discretionary authority.
FRbM RALEIGH REGULATORY 03.21.1997 16:19 P.03
2
Construction of all portions of Wakefield will cumulatively
impact approximately 5.9 acres of wetlands and 1.5 acres of
stream channels associated with Richland Creek, unnamed
tributaries of Richland Creek, and the Neuse River. The wetlands
to be impacted are primarily wooded and are located adjacent to
creeks and streams on the property which drain to the Neuse
River, which is a recognized nutrient-sensitive water. The
wetlands provide significant water quality functions such as the
entrapment of pollutants, conversion of accumulated nutrients
into non-toxic states, and settling Qf suspended sediments. The
wetlands also provide flood storage capacity, the loss of which
would decrease the retention time for upland runoff and thereby
further impair water quality functions. Additionally, they
provide important habitat for numerous aquatic and terrestrial
species, as well as travel corridors for mobile species. Based
on these anticipated impacts, we continue to believe that the
proposed jurisdictional activities within waters of the United
States associated with the Wakefield Development (residential,
commercial, schools, and golf course) will rosult in morn than
minimal adverse environmental effects- Accordingly, your
proposed work, as depicted in your permit application of December
20, 1996, does not qualify for NWP authorization.
Based upon discussions during the March 10, 1997 meeting, it
is our understanding that you intend to reevaluate your proposal
to further avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts as much as
practicable. Upon completion of that review, your agent will
submit a modified PCN for our consideration and processing in
accordance with our regulations and guidelines. Please be
reminded that, for the purposes of NWP 26, the entire Wakefield
parcel is considered to be one subdivision. Accordingly, the 3-
acre and 500 linear foot restrictions will be considered
cumulatively pursuant to NWP 26 for all portions of the
development (residential, commercial, schools, and golf course).
Please also note that the North Carolina Department of
Cultural Resources has recommended, by letter dated January 9,
1997, (copy enclosed) that an archaeological survey be conducted
of the project area. This reconnendation is based upon the high
potential that the property contains both prehistoric and
historic period archaeological sites which may be eligible for
inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. The
FFiOM RALEIGH REGULATORY
3
03.21.1997 16 20 P.04
requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act must
be fulfilled for any DA permit authorization (NWP or individual
permit) involving a property listed or eligible for listing on
the National Register of Historic Places. Accordingly, the
concerns identified by the Department of Cultural Resources must
be resolved prior to any permit action taken by the Corps of
Engineers.
Should you have questions, please contact Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
of my regulatory staff at the Raleigh Regulatory Field Office,
telephone [phone], extension 23.
Sincerely,
Michael D. Smith, P.W.S.
Chief, North Section
Regulatory Branch
File : wkf1eld. doc
CESAW-CO-RN/SMTTH
FILE/MALL 3120197
Enclosure
Copy Furnished (w/o Enclosure):
Mr. Jim Spangler
Barrett Kays and Associates
Post Office Box 2979
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-2979
Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley
North Carolina Department of
Cultural Resources
109 East Jones street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807
BCF:
CESAW-CO-RR/Jolly & Alsmeyer
I .•FRbM RALEIGH REGULATORY 63.21.1997 16:19 P.61
1 1 III 11?- - 1 4Y ?
FACSIMILE 'T'RANSMITTAL HEAM SHEET
? aa+ er vas ram. ?. ? z?? t: +n. o,?1,eu,?t +ad+?-v ? aasca
COMMAND/ NAME/ OFFICE TELEPHONE
FAX NO.
OFFI E SYMPOL IA"r7Vnfjo. AI [ mmm-j. 1AU7VV0sv1comm.1.
USAGE, Wilmington Distda T(cu JOlly
Raleigh ResWswry Piold Ofr= CESAW-CO-RR (919) 876-$441, psi. 22 [phone]
CLASSIFICATION PRECEDENCE NO. PAGES DATE-TIME MONTH YEAR RM.EASERIS SIGNA-fURC
anewng this
f!c$der/
UNCLASS r d'? 47
REMARKS
.Space Below for Comrnrrnicedons Center Use Only
DA FORM 391", JUL 90 DA FORM 3918474 AUG 72 Is OBSOLETE USAVPC v3.1o
NCWRC,HCP,FALLS LAKE

TEL:[phone] Mar 17'97 15:20 No.007 P.02
® North C:arofina W ' fe Recces Commission f° 1
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604,1188,919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorncy
Division of Water Quality
rr+?
From: Owen F, Anderson, Pi rngnt Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
Date: March 17, 1997
Subject: 401 Water Quality Certification for Wakefield Development, Neuse River Basin
Wake County, DWQ 961148
Staff biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed
the subject project. We made a site visit with the consultants on March 4, 1997. Our comments
are provided in accordance with certain provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48
Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-6674) and Section 401(b) of the Clean Water Act of 1977
(a.9 amended),
We have reviewed the application dated December 20, 1996 for impacts for relocation of
Falls of the Ncusc Road, Plantation Drive and a commercial collector street. Based on our
conversations with the consultant in the field, there will be a school, a residential development, a
golf course and a commercial development on the property. Based on the information provided
in the application, there will be an impact of 0.5236 acres of wetlands. The application states
that there iq a total cif0.4786 acres of wetland on the projeet sites.
We are of the opinion that the applicant is pursuing a piecemeal approach to the project.
No application has been submitted for impacts for the residential section or the golf course;
however, the map submitted with the application indicates there are likely to be impacts from
both. It is not possible for utw staff to detorminc if impacts have been avoided or minimized. A
piecemeal approach may not insure a minimization of impacts, because once major infrastructure
is in place the residential development and golf course placement is limited.
We do not believe that sewer routing has minimized impacts to streams in the area,
Munholes 19, 17, and 21 downstrcmn of the school sits are located approxima.toly 15-25 fcnc Off
of the creek bank. This will likely necessitate clearing vegetation from the stream banks and
may cause the streams to be destabilized and severely impacted,
NCI WRC , HCP , FALLS LAKE TEL :[phone] Mar 17 ' 97 15:21 No. 007 P.03
Wakefield Plantation
961148
2
March 17, 1997
We have the following comments and recommendations concerning this certification:
1. Require the applicant to submit an application that accurately reflects the impacts and
wetlands for the entire project. The application should cover impacts for the residential
section, golf course, and roadways. A mitigation plan to compensate for all unavoidable
impacts should be submitted concurrently with the application.
2. Insure that the sewers have been routed to minimize impacts to streams. Moving the
sewers further t""rom the stream banks is recommended.
3. Place deed restrictions on all remaining wetlands on the property to prevent additional fill
by current or future owners.
Thiink you for the opportunity to commont during the planning stages for this project. If I
oun be of further amsjstmcc, contact me at [phone].
cc: Eric Alsmoyer, US Army Corps of Engineers
r

I M
U g

040

14 "Ise
4
0
?I

a
I
f
r?
8
1
3
1
{ I.
I
r

t:
f
I
0--
001. I V ® 3 $
V
r

M
av
V
b
j
m

T VS
9.. J
0 A.
3S nN? ?
t?
VP
o S ? -?.. ¢ S rd s
Xxx?x
co
Project narnp.
County la ?'?
y
Name of evaluator
AU Nearest road k
Wetland area ? A- acres Wetland widt
Date
Wetland type (select one)*
? ottomland hardwood forest ? Pine savanna ? Bog forest
CtIY Headwater forest ? Freshwater marsh ? Bog/fen
? Swamp forest ? Estuarine fringe forest ? Seep
? Wet flat ? Ephemeral wetland ? Other
? Pocosin ? Carolina Bay
*The rating sys em cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
OW weight
Water storage x 4.00 =
?
G,1
Bank/Shoreline stabilization
Pollutant removal
Wildlife habitat
-
x 4.00 =
x 5.00 =
x 2.00
i , ' XI ?
'` '''' rl? Wetland Score

U v Aquatic life value

Recreation/Education .-

- x 4.00

x 1.00 #'•''"
..
G * Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% non point disturbance within 1 /2 mile upstre am, upslope, or radius
frrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr..rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

s? D
n ?

LA4

... r
c?rn? srT
- - - -------- --- ---
7, -2
G 6° X " , ?? h?- 7?$ .' _- ? S ),;v /y ?--ws/l Lo
OoQs t?? 1 'VC '?. oC' S s;s.nc N
2?.3h3?NS'I? ?121-
f-1-7 7
??-xSb
I?
&A a28 6!6 'mow 04AYAW*T -OT 5 .?

RpoII iol

u

sll''llI''Ill"' Barrett Ka ys & Associates, P.A.
224 FAYETTEVILLE STREET MALL
' SUITE 100, 11.0. BOX 2979
RALEIGI I. NC 27602-2979
' I'P.I,F,PI IONS 919 828-1903
1ACSIMIIJ: 919 828-036

.Ianumv_ 1997
® Barrett Ka s & Associates

January 31, 1997
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615

Mr. Eric Galamb
N. C. Division of Water Quality
' 4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Environmental Sciences
Civil Engineerring
Environmental Engineering
Planning
Landscape Architecture
' RE: Requested Additional Information to Complete Permit Applications (COE #199602047, 199700234
through 199700251; DWQ #961148) for Wakefield
' BKA #9612019, 9612020, 9612021, 9611002-A
Dear Mr. Alsmeyer and Mr. Galamb:
Please find attached a set of documentation that fulfills your agencies' requests for additional information on the
' Wakefield-area projects.
We have attempted to quantify all potential impacts, by type and permittee. Please note that a significant portion of
the planned residential developments have been through the site plan application/review/approval process by the
City of Raleigh. The residential applicants are committed to moving forward with their projects, and are willing to
implement the avoidance, minimization and mitigation techniques associated wit their projects.
The commercial portions of the area have not been through that process. Also, the commercial applicants have not
yet decided how they will proceed, if at all, with wetlands and stormwater permitting, design, etc., beyond the
information presented in the attached package.
' We hope that this information package provides you with the information necessary to proceed with review and

1

224 FAYETTEVILLE STREET MALL
' SUITE 100, P.O.BOX 2979
RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27602-2979
TELEPHONE [phone]
H:\clients\wakefi\9612021\corext\EA003.doc FACSIMILE 919 8 2 8- 0 3 6 5

i
® Barrett Kays & Associates
1
1 Page 2
January 31, 1997
1 Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
Mr. Eric Galamb
1
approval of the minor road crossing and sewer line impact permit applications associated with the major sewer trunk
1 lines and highways to serve this 2,400 acre area.
Sincerely,
1 BARRETT "YS & ASSOCIATES
c-?4-:
1 James .Spangler, I
ct Manager
1 Attachment
1 cc: Danny Colton Barrett Kays
Rich Rowe LaMarr Bunn
Karl Blackley Carl Simmons
1 Billy Sutton
1
1
1
1
1 H:\clients\wakeft\9612021\corext\EA003.doc

S
1
N
3
1
N
O
O

Contents
Introduction
Permit Application
Other Anticipated Impacts
Proposed Mitigative Measures
HAcl Tents\wakefi\9612021 \reports\wetpermit. doc
1
2
3
4

u

C

F

r

I I

H

F

Introduction
The purpose of this report is to provide additional information regarding impacts to
wetlands and waters of the U.S. resulting from proposed development project activities at
the 2,400 acre area commonly known as Wakefield in Raleigh, NC. Joint permit
applications were submitted on December 20, 1996, for three road projects (NWP-14),
including Relocation of Falls of the Neuse Road, Plantation Drive Collector Street, and
Commercial Collector Street; and three sanitary sewer projects (NWP-12) including the
Upper Neuse Sewer Extension, Richland Creek Trunk Sewer, and Richland Creek
Tributary Sewers. In response to this submittal, the Corps of Engineers (COE) expressed
concerns regarding impacts of additional proposed construction (residential, commercial
and golf course areas) at the site, as referenced in the January 17, 1997 letters from
Michael Smith (COE) to Mr. Danny Colton of Wakefield Developers, L.L.C and Mr.
Rick Rowe of Atlantic Real Estate Company. This report addresses these concerns by
providing information on potential impacts from projects over the entire area. Section 1.0
provides general information including physical site description, property owners, land
uses, and proposed development plans. Section 2.0 contains a copy bf the previously
submitted permit applications for major roads and sanitary sewers. This submittal hereby
makes for reapplication of these permits. Section 3.0 provides detailed quantification of
potential impacts from the remaining projects, as requested by the COE, including the.
residential, commercial, and golf course projects of the area. In addition to road and
sanitary sewer impacts in these areas, this section addresses expected impacts from
miscellaneous activities such as stormwater facility siting, lot grading, and stream bank
stabilization. Section 4.0 describes the minimization/avoidance efforts in the planning
process, generalized mitigation plans, and stormwater issues.
HAd ients\wakefi\9612021\reports4etpermit.doc
fl
1.0 Site Description
The approximately 2,400-acre Wakefield area is located in north Raleigh, NC. The

n

project sites are bordered on the west by Falls of the Neuse Road, on the east by U.S.
Highway 1, on the north by Old NC 98, and on the south by the Neuse River. The area is
located within the Richland Creek subbasin and the Neuse River watershed, and occupies
approximately 22% of the 9600+-acre Richland Creek basin. The area is within city
limits of the City of Raleigh. Richland Creek flows through the area from the north and
empties into the Neuse River approximately 2000 feet south of the property line. A site
location map is provided in Figure 1.
The area encompasses broad, rolling topography in the uplands over the east and west
portions of the property. The central portion of the site generally consists of narrower
ridges with moderate to steep slopes along the stream valleys draining to a floodplain
bordering Richland Creek. Surface elevations range from approximately 290 feet above
mean sea level (msl) in the northwest corner of the site to 190 feet above msl at the
southern end of the site along Richland Creek. The area consists of approximately fifteen
hydrologic sub-basins which contain third and fourth order streams and wetland units
draining to Richland Creek and the Neuse River.
The average annual precipitation in the Raleigh area, based on long-term records from
Raleigh-Durham International Airport, is 44.4 inches (NOAA, 1995). This precipitation
is well distributed across the year, with monthly averages ranging from 2.6 to 5.1 inches.
Typically, July and August are the months with the most precipitation, and October and
November are the months with the least precipitation. The average annual temperature
for the study area is 49.5° F.
According to the Wake County Soil Survey (SCS, 1971), the soils at the Wakefield area
are mostly of the Cecil-Appling association. The soils of this association are
H:\clients\wakefi\9612021 \reports\wetpermit.doc

® Barrett Kays &
Associates
Enviromnaird Sciences
C""' gineering
Gmirwmaand Firgineering
Plavtntg
lcadsccpe Amckfemm
224 Fayetteville St. Mall
Raleigh, NC 27602
[phone] Phone
[phone] Fax
N
W E
S
Scale: 1"=38K'
WAKEFIELD
GENERAL SITE LOCATION
COUNTY
,o OUgq oce/?, LANDFILL
Ns
DURANT
TRAILS !``'F''?"8c^ I ? fri I \ e?uv.?m?c! nron oq

' characterized by gently sloping to steep, deep, well drained soils that have a subsoil of
' firm clay loam to clay; which is derived mostly from granite, gneiss, and schist.
' 1.1 Land Ownership - needs more information
The contiguous property (2100+ acres), excluding parcels owned by CP&L, NCDOT and
Wake Forest, was originally purchased by Anvil Associates, L.L.P. from North Hills,
' Inc. in July, 1996, as shown on Figure 2. Subsequently, portions of the property have
been sold to various parties with different development objectives. First, approximately
121 acres were purchased by Wake County in 1996 for construction of a K-12 school
campus and a YMCA, Figure 3. The property was further subdivided into residential
' areas purchased by Wakefield Developers, L.L.P. in 1996, and commercial areas in the
process of being purchased by Atlantic Real Estate Company, Figure 3. The residential
' portion will be further divided into individual development tracts for sale to Hale Irwin
' Golf and homesite developers, pending ongoing negotiations and property sales, Figure 4.
' 1.2 Land Use IS".
' Existing land use consists of woods (1513 ac), grass/open space (505 ac.), low density
residential (5 ac), industrial areas including the CP&L substation (23 ac.) and Wake
' Forest sewer pumping station (1/3 ac.), gravel and dirt roads (19 ac.), and water (18 ac.).
These existing land uses were determined from recent aerial photos which were digitized
into a GIS to determine acreages as shown on Figure 5.
' Proposed future land use, assuming full build out of the site, includes park/grass/open
space (259 ac.), golf course (187 ac.), woods (13 ac.), medium density residential (652
ac.), high density residential (201 ac.), commercial/ industrial (465 ac.), institutional (179
ac.), roads (99 ac.), and water (27 ac.). These future land use acreages were determined
from the most recent master planning efforts at the site and are shown in general form on
' Figure 6.
H Acl ients\wake fi\9612021 \reports\wetperm it. doc
0

N
Hi
t
l
30 ?
a
r j
I

/? m N m

/ r
W ae ??? ?
1

< k
/ I

Q I ??s
\ M
-\
a
r N,. co

` r
d W W b /
go Ic
°'Y a W
?d
<
V ® = ° i
? i
i
i
1 ?
i
T.

y(?
?F<

tom- ?'

I
TM N co
w? YOU ?
3<
0
z
\
\
V
a?
V
m

K

1
J
r I /
<

M
W
b
gill 3 a

i 1

Gi
M
l

W
04
J
I
LL
1 i

?7
F

Z I

1

2.0 Copy of Previously Submitted Permits for Which Re-Application is Hereby Made

1

0

d

n

7

1*1?
HAcl ients\wakefi\9612021 \reports\wetpermit.doc
Prior Applications
for
' Road Construction Projects
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
13A Barrett Days & Associates
J
' December 20, 1996
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer and
' U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regional Office
' Via Hand Delivery, December 20, 1996
Re: Joint Permit Applications for NWP 14
BKA#: 9612021
'
Dear Mr. Alsmeyer:
Environntel7ta! Sciences
Civil Engineering,
Environmental Engineering
n!li:C?rttl I>ChltcchnYe
Mr. F.ric Galamb
Water Quality Section RECEIVED
DWQ - DEHNR
Regulatory Branch
' We are pleased to submit to you permit applications for the following projects:
1. Project I - Relocation of Falls of Neuse Road, Phase 1
2. Project 2 - Plantation Drive Collector Street
3. Project 3 - Commercial Collector Street
' Please also find joint permit application forms, data tables, maps indicating proposed areas of
impacts, and location maps for NWP 14. All requirements of NWP 14 and state conditions will
be met. We have attempted to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands and Waters of 1i.S.
We have also included the City of Raleigh Comprehensive Plan Amendment Map (CP-14-96).
This was the City of Raleigh's proposed and adoption changes to add these roadways to the
City's comprehensive plans when this area was brought into the City's jurisdiction this year.
The three roadway projects are required to be built pursuant to Raleigh's comprehensive plans to
' serve regional traffic movements. We believe that all three of these projects represent separate
and complete projects.
We have also enclosed a Wetland NWI Map and Soils Map indicating. the general acceptability
of the future Neuse River crossing for the Phase II of Relocation of Falls of Neuse Road which is
' not part of this project nor a responsibility of the current applicant. As you requested we have
computed that the end of the road as it approaches the Neuse River can shift in a "window"' of
UOOLtt /UU fC:Ct alutig the Neuse River. It I? pCv.il)al?IC LnaL LILC iLILLtrL: LiIC i CLI?? t- cl
t will require only a bridge. The location on the south side of the river is situated where an upland
ridge and hill comes down to the river.

' 224 FAN' ETTFVIL,LE ST P.EET N4AL1.
SUI I'E 100, P.O. BOX 2979
RAi.El011. N0RTII CAR1NA 2-,0 -_9:.
' TELEP110NE 919 8 2 8 1 9 0 3
14 \clienu\wakefi\9612024\corext\ea002.doc
F:?cst?tiLE 9t9 gzao3es

IN Barrett Kays & Associates
Please contact me if you need any additional information. As we discussed with you, the
application desire to start construction as soon as possible therefore your prompt help has been
most appreciated.
Sincerely,
BARRETT KAYS & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
James . Spang E.I.
cc: Eric Galamb
IN,
H:\c1 ients\wakef \9612024korext\ea002.doe
' En 2

T

d
' ? r,CeL
j.yi . aC(
;cscz
V
2
7
I, r
I.r ?.
r r
AU(,
rtiLrlY? r, vin
CIA ?11?'/? //? l r ? J 1`? ( f' ` \ x>, ? \? 11 ` C J_?\ I( i
PR)l 4-
XP"
OUB
moo.
1J 11.
`PFOf? Wo'A /
I A-7
--7 G` ll(A-? •{? srt?y;G?'i`CJ Y°c.' Gf7-.-
r
1

u

r
LI
the Iccrticn of c y e-.
Ccnne` cr c-tOz he 'Ncker'al f
sire frcrr, ,=-clt Lcke 'c .;ic?:lcnd
Creek mcil be ccns ac d cs
dcvefcOment plcru (;Cr the crew
cre reviewed.
J--
L.
I

--- - --- ------
(? SIGN;}?? sots ?I

?ICEFjE?-? A\KEAAtl
Are-
?e^?c? C , ere maec ses C, e wec. C
aNcvs cad cec
once es-cj Cc--,ec-;cns oe? oe
e`CCI c 1? re?Ce: 7Cj uses are
?.
"•C?..'C J =C

FoL.v?
MUM imam=

- Relocation of Falls of-Neuse Rd.
DEM ID: ACTION ID: Phase I
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #): NTP l# 14
' JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
' Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER WATER QUALITY PLANNING
CORPS OF ENGINEERS DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
' DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
P.O. Box 1890 AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 P.O. Bor. 29535 RECEIVED
' ATTN: CESAW-CO-E Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Telephone [phone] ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone] DEC 2 0 1596
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE COWS OL ERS. h
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF E.NVIRONME
PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: Wakefield Developers, LLC Anvil Associates, LLP
1802 Brightseat Road and 003 high House Road, Suite 105
2. Owners Address: I -apdg-Gr s n.4T1 20 S r\L Tf S 1 Z
3. Owners Phone Number (Home): (Work):
' 4. U Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number:
Jin Spangler Barrett Kays & Associates

I I

919-825-1903 224-?Fayetteville Street Mall,Suite 100
t' /1 r7 ?] Ralei h, N(' 776n9 ?A7a
C Lac at.on 0f w071, 'ST Ai 1-.'??CH T.? a ?<(?
Nearest Town or City: Rale igh
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): See attachedsite man
Generally, past of current Falls of Neuse Road, west of US llw-y 1,
north of Neuse River
6. Name of Closest StreanvRiver: Richland Creel,

0

7. River Basin: Neuse
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS 11? YES [ ] NO f{ ]
9. Have any Section 444 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES [ ] NO ( ]
If yes, explain.
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site:
0.2071 ac.
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
Filled: n?.?7-1 ac
Drained:
Flooded:
Excavated:
Total Impacted: 0.2071 acres

I
r

7

12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-8 1/2" X I1" drawings only):
Construction of major thoroughfare with 6 lanes and 130' to 250' right of way;
and minor thoroughfare with 80' r.o.w.
13. Purpose of proposed work: Provide major thoroughfare connection, as shown on amended
City of Raleigh Comprehensive Plan CP-14-96, for regionwide traffic movement.
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity must be carried out in wedlands. Also, note measures
taken to minimize wetland impacts. Minimal crossings necessary to provi e road
_extension between designated terminus on comprehensive plan.
15. You.are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? .. YES INTO [ J
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES ;x) NO[
)
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line.
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy.
E. What is land use of surrounding property?
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal?

's SigU.lm Date
7A-+4E? A. S PE?c??
Bmt? E -Tv Kp'- -s ? A5?0 c .
A-S A; SGT FD 2 O W N E9 .
11
i
Road Project 1
Relocation of Falls of the Neuse Road
NWP #14
12/20/96
Acreage of Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. located on and impacted by the project.

Crossing Acres Located
in Project Acres Impacted
by Crossing
R1A 0.0143 0.0143
R113 0.0460 0.0460
R1C 0.0935 0.0935
R1 D 0.0188 0.0188
R1 E 0.0245 0.0245
R1 F 0.0022 0.0022
R1G 0.0078 0.0078
Total Acres on Project Site 0.2071
Total Acres Impacted by Project 0.2071

,. t

1

r

11
1 IS:r I f?l
l•- /011 ox F
UIN\rUU U
\ I Jli /
i
I RELOCATION
N OF
® Barrett Kays & FALLS OF NEUSE ROAD
Associates PHASE I
E-iran -mlS,,i-,s W (Approximate Locations)
ci?d engineering
Environmental Engineering

' Planning S
Londscape Archiieca- WAKE FOREST, N.C.
NE/4 RALEIGH 15' QUADRANGLE
224 Fayetteville St. Mall
35078-H5-T5-024
Raleigh, NC 27602
[phone] Phone Scale: I"=20001 1967
[phone] Fax PHOTOREVISED 1987
DMA-52551 NE-SERIES V842

0

'?? ?,/??, ,' i(;• ? ;!? :????, ?-??;,,? `, .,??? t,, ,;..?.?1 Jai
1Z 7(
K?i
? il
301
U\? i C J \\;. 31
ji,
U \ \ I -" \\
?J X
J m/ / J \ i , l'r 00 0
1 ; IJ 1 ??
?4U
G i I ' 300 ( ,
\o I,'i ' ? su zta/ i
\\\
W r.
\, , .\.50 i ? I "? \U
J1 vr/ `,\ liv
/I
r -.
/ o
UU
1 \
?1 \ I
\1 I?I
\ I
,•, `', WATERS OF U. S.
?R A_
2L

ii
I
0.
i

Road Project 1
Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road,
Phase I
Crossing A
Scale 1" = 50'
r

i

I
260
1 I
250

240 j

"

----------------- 72
RCP
' 230
i
,I
I
220
I
i

Road Project 1
Relocation of Falls

of Neuse Road,
Phase I
Crossing `4
Scale 1" = 50'

I
I , AEA Or? M ACT--x).04^0 Ac_
i
i
I
Oj
I U
? II I I
I
Road Project 1
j j Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road,
I
I Phase I
Crossing B
??? I i I Scale 1" = 50?
r

' I

i

230
i

' j
i

24x8 AR,,
l
1
190

' L ` Lf
0 0 0 0 0 0 o c
N N N N

N
cli
Road Project 1
' 45+00 46+0o Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road,
Phase
Crossing R
Scale 1" -- 50'
If
?I
?i
1
l
1
?I
i
O I /
I /
I /
I /
,.1 1
1 c
i 1 x-22
?'; - ?- -
I V,
,lei I
,
;
pRF41, \ IMPACT=0.0935 Ac
I
? RICy?-/ ? R
Road Project 1
Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road,
Phase
1 I `I
Crossing C
Scale 1" = 50'
r

I
? I

i
?I

230
i

I 220 I

I
?
I
210 I

-? 48'x/'
I
200
190
Ln
00
o T)
r?
CO
O
N CD
O
N r--
O
N N (D CO
O OI OI
O G:_
C
C,
48+00 49+00 50+00
51 JIF 00
Road Project 1
Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road,
Phase I
Crossing C
Scale 1" = 50'
?J
.. \1 \ \ I / /jam /
t _ \ \ \ ;
i
1 i
OF PACT' 0.0188 c ` -
WATERS OF S\
\
1
1
I \r"
Road Project 1
Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road,
Phase
Crossing
` 1: scale 1" = 5Q'

I
240

i i
210

_ {-------- i ;,/
? I
N N N Road Project 1
53+00 54+00 Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road,
Phase
Crossing D
Scale 1" = 50'

?I

\ i

k
Y
j^r/ 1

VF D _

?;- Road Project 1
Relocation of Falls
of euse Road,
Phase
Crossing E
Scale 1" a 5®'

250
240
230

210
Cam! N
NI NI N
6+00 97+00

I _
i;
I
I I
Road Project 1
Relocation of Palls
N N of Neuse Road,
Phase t
98+00
Crossing E
Scale 1" = 50'
1
?I
?I
1
?i
?I

Road Project 1
Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road,
Phase 1
Crossing F
Scale 1" = 50'

,

I

330
i
3 2 0
I
I

310 ?
_ -- - --- -- - -- ----
z00

I 54 RCP

Ii ---1 -- 290 --
i

280

Road Project 1
Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road,
Phase I
Crossing IF
Scale 1" -- 50'
i
\WAT S.
PAC :TS 7 Ac
1 "
/

\\ Road Project 1
Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road,
Phase
Crossing G
Scale 1" _ 50'

310

300

I
-- F

280
--
?
-- --
-
-- I

i 54"_RCR,

270
- ---- -- --- - -------
Road P
t 1
rojec
Relocation of Falls
o of Neuse Road,
N N N Phase 1
31+00 32+00 Crossing G
Scale 1" = 50'

n

F

Plantation Drive
' DEM ID: ACTION ID: Residential Collector Street
1. ` ation? ide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit r): VF11n P14
' JOINT FORM FOR
Nation,"ide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
W
ENGI OF N DISTRICT ENGINEER WATER QUALITY PLANNLNG _
CORPS OF ILMINGTO
' DEPARTMENT OF?THE ARMY DNCC DEPARTMENT PENN-v ON-NENl-,A FM E I V E
P.O. Box 1890 AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 P.O. Bo,: 29535 DEC l ??
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Telephone [phone] ATiN: MR. JOHN DOR-NEY
Telephone [phone] Regulatory Branch
' ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF ENGINT-ERS.
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: Wakefield Developers, L.L.C.
2- Owlets Address: 1302 Br i ghtseat- Roadi, Landover, MW 20T85
3. Owners Phone Number (Home): (Work):
' =. U Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corpor ate n`f;cial, address, p`:;o^e number:
Jim Spangler Parrarr k ?,S ? a•???6??tes
919-828-1903 224 Fayetteville Street `?all, Suite 100
Ral.ei5Zh ',,C 276 -2Q7g
Nearest Town or City: Raleigh
' Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): See attached site map
Generally, east of current Falls of h Ne „5e RDAH , ?TPgt of
Richland Creek, connecting to future NC 98 Bypass
' 6. Name of Closest Stream/River: Richland ;;reek
' 7. River Basin:
8. Is this protect located in a watershed classificui as Trout, Sn, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS II? YES [ j NO (t j
' 9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES (] NO )
TF?.?c ,..-nlaln
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site:
' 0.2134 ac- .

11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impactcd by the proposed project:
Filled:
0.2572 uc.
' Drain al - -- -- -
Flooded:
Excavated:
Total Impacted: 0.2572 ac.
fl

1

H
k

0

F

12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLAY'S-8 1/2" X 11" drawings only): -
Construction of residential collector with 4 lanes and 60'
to 90' right of w
13. Purpose of proposed work: Provide residential collector connection, as shown or
amended City of Raj ei¢1) CmmPrPhnns;. o nl an ('P-1/1-96-for reZiQo ' traffic, rinirpm r
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also, note measures
taken to minimize wetland impacts. Minimal crossings necessary to Provide road extension
between designated terminus on the comprehensive elan.
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? YES iC ] NO [ ]
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NTvIFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES `x ) NO[
)
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line.
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy.
E. What is land use of surrounding property?
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal?
s Simia&ke

Date

1

Road Project 2
Plantation Drive Residential Col lector Street
' NWP #14
12/20/96
Acreage of Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. located on and impacted by the project.
Acres Located Acres Impacted
' Crossing in Project by Crossing
R2A" 0.0440 0.0613
' R213
R2C` 0.0142
0.1250 0.0142
0.1515
R2D 0.0131 0.0131
R2E 0.0171 0.0171
'
Total Acres on Project Site 0.2134
Total Acres Impacted by Project 0.2572

Impact outside Right of Way due to slope of fill

dt'-
1
;nln
1
i?
? II`

0
H

I I
I?;??r

s i

® Barrett Kays &
Associates
En ?i.annu-.uul Sciencer
C!"!1 Engineering
E-iranmenra7 Engineering
Planning
L. dscape Archilec fare
224 Fayetteville St. Mall
Raleigh, NC 27602
[phone] Phone
[phone] Fax
N
S
Scale: 1 "=2000'
PLANTATION DRIVE
RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR
(Approximate Locations)
WAKE FOREST, N.C.
NE/4 RALEIGH 15' QUADRANGLE
35078-1-15-T5-024
1967
PHOTOREVISED 1987
DMA- 5255 1 NE-SERIES V842
ARrA OF IMPACT: 0.0613 Ac
wF .?_ANos
° i Road Project 2
Plantation Drive
% Collector Street
Crossing A
,L
f-61
-c, Scale 1" = 50'
10

1 1.1"
j-
u
03
NI
WATERS U.S

?J

Road Project 2
Plantation Drive
Collector Street
Crossing B
Scale 1" = 50'
?j.
N
? I
l
i
t
1
i r
i?
,
- 1l A
' Vr „V'AC.l
'
i
/
r
i
i
i
v?
Road Project 2
Plantation Drive
Collector Street
Crossing C
Scale 1" = 50'
T ? \
A
1 )I
A
WATERS OF U. S.
i
i
/ LL/
r__ I
\
F IMP = 0131 Ac
j Road Project 2
Plantation Drive
Collector Street
Crossing D
/ Scale 1" -- 50'
1

? f
?0r IU)ACI=L.Ji71 AC -
A' A -
` '-
?- Road Project 2
Plantation Drive
Collector Street
Crossing E
Scale 1" = 50'

O 0O
OC

v/ v
U?
IMPACT AREA
0.0019 AC
ANTI-SEEP
COLLAR (TYP.)
- 7?0 44
L-14 k?_ op

SEER PROD CT 2
Richlan reek ,
Se
CROSS G?.L
Scale : 1" 20'

I
4
co
CY)
2

veeo

i

W
I
i
EWE ECT 2
Richland Creeks/
CRO - SIN J
Scale 1. 1"=20'/
i
CY)

j --SEW- , CT 2
;Richland Creed';
1
1\-/
Sewer
CR0SSIN J
Scale ? 1"=20' P

r

1

t

DEM ID: ACTION ID: Richland Creek Tributory Sewers
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #): frt'rp1112
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER WATER QUALITY PLAN 1NG RECEIVED
, CORPS OF ENGINEERS DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGE
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALl
P.O. Box 1890 AND NATURAL RESOURCES UtC L 0 i )
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 P.O. Bo,: 29535
' ATTN: CESAW-CO-E Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Telephone [phone] ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY Regulatory Branch
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
PLEASE PRWr.
1. Owners Name: Wakefield Developers
' 2. Owne s Address: 1802 Ilrinhtseat Road, an io. c:r i) ,)7°5
3. Owners Phone Number (Home): (Work):
4. U Applicable: Agent's name or responsible address, phone number:
Jim Spanger ;Jarrett lays S Associates
919 - 828-1903 224 Favetteville Street Mall, Suite 100
Ra1e.(;n, '1C 27602 - 2970,
5 T ^ n r ; ` .r. n -} (",T?.' S T A77 A,
r u ?, n, n ---- - -- --- ----
Nearest Town or Citv: Raleigh
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): See attached site map generally east
of current Falls of the Neuse Road, west of Richlands Creek.
6. Name of Closest Strearn/River: Richland Creek
7. River Basin: Neuse
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS II? YES [ J NO [X ]
9. Have any Section 444 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES [ ] NO [y,]
If yes, cxplain.
10. Estimat.cd total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site: U U,?2.
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
' Filled:
Drained:
Flooded:
Excavated: 0.0077 acres
Total Impacted: 0.0077 acres

12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLAY'S-8 1/2" X I I" drawings only):
Installation of Sanitary sewer lines.

1

r
D
13. Purpose of proposed work: Extend City of Raleigh municipal sewer system to serve
future residential areas
14.
taken Statemireasonsnimize etlathe ndaim acct believes that this activity musq birec o°acttIiev Y vrC$' note measures
p Minimal crossings re
collection, anti-seep collars to be installed at all crossings.
15: You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed orproposed for listing endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? . YES [1-] INTO
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS. [ )
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the pre sen?e of historic
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES [ ] NO [ ]
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line.
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy.
E. What is land use of surrounding property?
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal?
y?
I
?? tN !1 R, r; vw N t?V Aj P L! C/b"'7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Sewer Project 3
Richland Creek Tributary Sewers
NWP #12
12/20/96
Acreage of Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. located on and impacted by the project.
Acres Located Acres Impacted
Crossing in Project by Crossing
SM 0.0023 0.0003
S313 0.0041 0.0002
S3C 0.0046 0.0006
SM 0.0280 0.0045
S3E 0.0023 0.0003
SY 0.0023 0.0003
S3G 0.0023 0.0003
S31-1 0.0069 0.0012
Total Acres on Project Site 0.0528
Total Acres Impacted by Project 0.0077

' A
0
WATER! ?F-U. S.
i
j ,
RFA OF IMPACT=
,6002 ACRES
- PROJECT AREA
0.0041 ACRES
00!
MH
c NI

SEWERS PROJECT" 3
RICHLAND CREEK `f RIB.
- - C r?o s 1-n4' A & R
J-ca-le
- ''
o
L
L?j
00
AREA OF IMPACT=0.0003 ACRES
Df?o

I
i
!
?E7
17
11 /
MCI&
'Pro
46 II { ,\

'PR ECT AREA=0.0023 Ac.
SEWER PROJECr ? '111?
RIC AND CREEK
Crossi ® & E ,?
Scale Vc 0'

i
REA 0.0003 A:
TRIB.
2
ORSS

t 1
WATERS OF U S.I

1 ,.

owl 4-
---- --- -S- R P R Q
RICHLAND C

--\
0.0023 Ac_ /.- --- ._-- ----__-?--__- _- --

r - 3
---
I
1,77/

cil
r.
i -
' - r
1
?1
r 1 //?/ i Ii'?? 1?^? ? ? l ? \?

j

t DENT DD: ACTION ID: Commercial Collector Street
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #.)' i1i'rp !`14
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
' Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER WATER QUALITY PLANNING
CORPS OF ENGINEERS DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
' DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
P.O. Box 1890 AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 P.O. Bo:,: 29535 RECEIVED
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] ATM: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone] DEC 2 o i?96
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CO ??,QQF?????E???IIGINEERS.
' SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVTRONMEN`N?f JA6q a-Ch
PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: Atlantic Pp,?l P&rarP
Hers.Address: 100 Canit.o is Sun t?
?0> F,
O?t un- C 7 13
3. Owners Phone Number (Home): (Work):
' 4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number:
Jim Spangler Barrett Kays & Associates
' 919-828-1903 224 Fayetteville Street 'Mall- Suite 100
Raleinh \rC ?7??n?_?qlo
Nearest Town or City: Raleigh
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): See attached site map
Generally, west of US IIwy 1, connecting future Falls of the Neuse Road
F

to future Plantation Drive
6. Name of Closest Stream/River: Richland Cr.ee!,_
7. River Basin: Neuse
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS II? YES [ J NO [x1
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES [ ) NO F
If yes, explain.
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site:
0.0581 car
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
Filled:
0.0593 a-c_
' Drained
Flooded:
' Excavated:
Total Impacted: 0.0593 acres

I

0
0

0

12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-8 1/2" X 11" drawings only):
Construction of minor thoroughfare with 80' right of way
13. Purpose of proposed work: Provide commercial service connection, as shown on amended
City of Ralei1h Comprehensive Plan CP-14-96, for re,ionwide traffic movement
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also, note measures
taken to minimize wetland impacts. Minimal crossings necessary to provide road extension,
between designated terrain-us- on the romprehansdire, pi aL?
15. You arc required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? YES [ x] NO [ ]
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NNMS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES [x ] NO [ ]
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
IT Additional information required by DEM:
deli,.eation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the proae, }.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
dc..:._-lon lin'-.
D. U a storm water management plan is required for this project, attach copy.
i= ia? 13 land use of surrounding property ?
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal?

tZ-?0 4l?
Owne 's Slgn?uk
Date

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Road Project 3
Commercial Collector Street
NWP #14
12/20/96
Acreage of Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. located on and impacted by the project.

Crossing Acres Located
in Project Acres Impacted
by Crossing
R3A 0.0098 0.0098
R313 0.0054 0.0054
RK 0.0102 0.0102
R3D` 0.0327 0.0339
Total Acres on Project Site 0.0581
Total Acres Impacted by Project 0.0593
Impact outside Right of Way due to slope of fill

L
Ill;-

D
I6: J XI

c'i"li \\! /:
r?

99?
Y;i"
® Barrett Keys &
Associates
E-- m....„rul .Science,
c-'! Engincer(ng
En wonmenn,l Engineering
Pla, iag
L-d-p-4-hitec-,
224 Fayett-lle St. Mall
Raleig)S NC 27602
[phone] Phrntc
[phone] Fax
N
S
Scale: I "=2000'
CONI1N'IERCIAL COLLECTORS
(Approximate Locations)
WAKE FOREST, N.C.
NEI4 RALEIGH 15' QUADRANGLE
35078-H5-T5-024
1967
PHOTOREVISED 1987
Dh1A- 5255 1 NE-SERIES V842
li
1
111
'I
1
'I
?I
I W
U

i
r
/ i

GJ I it ''
WATERS OF U.
z I i
j R A IMPA =0.0098 Ac

i
x
wl
J
j

Road Project 3
Commercial Collector Street
Crossing A
Scale 1" = 50'
CI3
\\ \ -- --
v
\
??610
i
5
\ %?,IoS\.OF U_. S.
AR A F !MPA =10,2254 _
Road Project 3
Commercial Collector Street
Crossing B
Scale 1" -- 50'
co
10
cl
s
0

X
----------------------
9EZI
WAT S OF U.S.
X I
Road ? I
Project 3
Commercial Collector Street
Crossing
Scale
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Prior Applications
for
Sewer Construction Projects

' L•'nvironniental Sciences
Civil Engineering
1 Barrett Kays & Associates Environmental
December 20, 1996 ?°?
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer ? ,
1.f.S. Arm\ Corps o1 ! n1Linc\,! !C?
Raleigh Area Office
D._
Via Hand Delivery, December ?0. NQO k E3Ca C?
Re: Permit Applications for N\?, i) 12 BKA#: 961202{
Dear Mr. Alsmevei :
We are pleased to Snhnw lII v'ml ;lppl1C1!Iit?Il? IM the ICvlll?v?Illt? projects:
1. Project I Upper Ncuse ?c\vcr 1 vtcnsioll
Prolec!
3. PrOJect j klchllmd (-Acci I rlt?UtCll\ ?\\CIs
Please also [Ind enclosed pCI-11111 <Ippliv;Iti1?n forms- data Lables- maps indicating proposed a!
of impacts. and location maps k)v A'WI) i All rCyuirements of-N\\/I) 12 and state c?>nditiiy:1?
Ii ,. \,II `t'.._ ?! ',l, p :p\: ,'..,. "!!. lllltl lCi ?(?11drl \\"1H
I-CCIUICCd, alld 1110 CAISt111L ,_rAdc 1, .:,1,1b11jlICd.
As we discussed in our meeting \\ith you ion 1•hursdav, December 19, 1996, all three proiects
represent separate and complete projects. Please contact me if you need any additional
information
Sincerely,
BARRETT KAYS & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
1<In1c> I A. Sp:uigicr- ? .I ".J .

I H:\clients\wakefi\961207.4\e rex,\-00 Ldo
224 FAYF?l'TF,VILLE Sritf:LI '.L.
I:\CSI\IIL1: 91.9 S25 0 3%,7,

DEM ID: ACTION ID: Upper. Neuse Sewer Extension
National ide Pe T=it Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit I"): Ned?? #12
JOINT FORM FOR
Nation,Aide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER WATER QUALITY PLANNLNG y
CORPS OF ENGINEERS DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANA V
' DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
P.O. Box 1890 AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 P.O. Boy 29535 DEC l U l yb
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Telephone [phone] ATTN: MR. IOH?N DORNEY Regulatory Branch
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: Wakefield Developers, LLC
? 1302 Brimhtseat Road, Landover, '-1D 20735
Ovvnc,s Address'
3. Owners Phone Number (Home): (Work):
4. U Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number:
Jim Spangler Barrett Kays & Associates
[phone] 224 1'ayetteville Street Mall, Suite 100
Raleigh, tdC 27602 - 2979
Nearest Town or City: Raleigh
1 Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): See attached Site Map East of Falls
of the Neuse Road, North of Neuse River, Nest of. Richland Creek
¦
6. Name of Closest Strcam/River: Neuse River.
7. River Basin: Neuse
' 8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS II? YES [ ] NO r]
9. Have any Section 444 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES [ J NO FK ]
If yes, explain.
0. F stimatzd total nurnbcr of acres of waters of the U.S., including wcdands, located on proicct site:
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
Filled:
' Drained:
Flooded.
Excavated:
' Total Impacted:

12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-8 1/2" X 11" drawings only):
Installation of Sanitary sewer line (16" to 8") to talking 7442 LF
in 3' wide trench with 20 to 30' easement.
13., Purpose of proposed work: Extend City of Raleigh municipal sewer system to serve
the upper Neuse basin.
' 14. State reasons why the applicant believes at this activity must b e P?" Hands. o t s
taken to minimize wetland impacts. Minimal crossings requffe ZS? ? ??}1 gravi tffll HIf
anti-seep collars to be installed at all crossings.
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? YES [ ` ] NO [ )
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES [?) NO [ ]
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the propert}.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line.
D. Lf a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy.
E. What is land use of surrounding property?
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal?
2)2-6 Date

N's At-c" l Fop 04J?? ??h?pLlC 1

Sewer Project 1
Upper Neuse Sewer Extension
NWP #12
12/20/96
Acreage of Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. located on and impacted by the project.

Crossing Acres Located
in Project Acres Impacted
by Crossing
S1A 0.0046 0.0003
S113 0.0037 0.0003
S1C 0.0303 0.0045
S1 D 0.0188 0.0003
S 1 E 0.0014 0.0002
S1F 0.0024 0.0003
S 1 G 0.0035 0.0005
S 1 H 0.0017 0.0002
S1I 0.0010 0.0001
Total Acres on Project Site 0.0674
Total Acres Impacted by Project 0.0064
"I,-

1K
5r 11
` 7J
\ 1
??• _ ? 1, l_ ? ?t ?? . ' ? /? ?ie / ` `\? \ \'?`??,?
302
A,
1?1 3
\\,
1?
1
JI j?
II^ ? /
J
T11"
I ) i
r
11) 1
/ I
11?
/?h 1
r
ilk
I
1
I
t, ? .
I
, I l,?
i. '
A
-
\A

t

, . f

1
4- 1
® Barrett Kays &
Associates
Environ.ne.nal Scirnces
Ci.d! Engineering
Enos -enml Engineering
Planning
Landscape Archirec mre
224 Fayetteville St. Mail
Raleigh, NC 27602
[phone] Phone
[phone] fax
UPPER :\'EUSE
SEWER EXTENSION
(Approximate Locations)
LL' E
WAKE FOREST, N.C.
5 NE14 RALEIGH 15' QUADRANGLE
35078-H5-T5-024
1967
SCdlC. 111=200?/?t PHOTOREVISED 1987
DMA- 52551 NE-SERIES V842

11

C

H

CII'
,
WATERS IN
RROJECT SITE
00046 AC

1

r

-1 AC?
j -AREA OF IMPACT',
/ 0.0003 `AC
i Il
,,111/A?TERS OF U.S. -
i
ANTI-SEEP
COLLAR (TYP.)

SEWER--PROJECT 1
Upper Ne-use
_ Sewer
C RR \
Scale
ill.-201
PROJECT AREA
0.0037 \AC
1 ,
ANTI-SEEP
CO LAR (TYP.)
WATERS OF U. S/' - n
SEWER PROJECT 1.
Uppe?Neuse
/ ?---Sewer
C R O S-SING B
/ -Scale 1"=2 '

i

1 / NI T I _SF-7r= ? i
\1
?j
JLJl

LL- - -
-=
0JECT- '
bevver
/RCS. mow. A E m A ,/?.
Scalp-
i 5 O'

1
\ `\?\\ \\ \ \ \ - '` \-
- 14?
-
-
0i
-SE WE-R--P Ac
S,?

SEWE-R-PROJECT 1-
?e N \ use
PP?
\
Sewe-r?
-----_CROSS]N E
-Scal\e 1°=20'
t
1

I

L
I-4,?

Q/9!

SEWER-R-ROJECT 1
__U p-p er N e u see
Sewer,,
_._ C OSSTNG? 7i?7'
Scale 1"=20'x'_,

I -

_

j /

i?
I? I
i
it
y
?$'EUER PROJE'CT f
UppO Neese
Sewer
CRO'SS/1NG C7
?clale T'=20'
?I
r

I`-

V
avv '

SEWER/ROJE-G T----i-
Upper Neuse
Sewer
CROSS
tale 1".20'
i
i
/ --

_,-K

E C-T _-1
ise

1

0

1

1

DEM ID: ACTION ID: Richland Creek Trunk Sewer
Nat'l on%vide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #): iAP #12
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER WATER QUALITY PLANNLNG
CORPS OF ENGINEERS DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENFT, HE RECEIVED
P.O. Box 1890 AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 P.O. Boy 29535
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 DEC L U 1y96
Telephone [phone] ATTN: MR..;OHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
1Qr
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CO&gFUEN8)E'E
Rq.nCh
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
PLEASE PRINT.
Wakefield Developers, LLC
1. Owners Name:
2. Owners Address: 1501_ "aD 20785
Dr s ''• - _ -_

3. Owners Phone Number (Home):
(Work):
4. Lf Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate o`f i ',, address, phone numb::
Jim Spangler Barrett Kays & Associates
919-828-1903 224 Favecteville Street Mall, Suite 100
aieis;h, `iC 27602 - 2979
S -7
Nearest Town or City. Ralei h

Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, ctc.): See attached site ma
Richland Creek between ideuse River and llS iiwv. . 14111,
6. Name of Closest Stream/River: Richland Crcc'
7 Ri B Meuse
generally following
i ver assn.
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS II? YES [ ] NO [-X]
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES [ ] NO [X]

If yes. explain.
10. Estimated total number of act-cs of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site:
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
' Filled:
' Drained:
Flooded:
Excavated: o.Ole6
Total Impacted: 7 tohg6
12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLAN'S-8 1/2" X 11" drawings only):
Installation of Sanitary sewer line (24' to 8') totalling 10,846 LP
in 3' wide trench with 20' to 40' easement

u
J

11

13. Purpose of proposed work: Extend City of Raleigh municipal sewer system to serve Richland
Creek basin.
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also note measures
taken to minimize wetland impacts. Minimal crossings required to achieve gravity
collection, anti-seep collars to be installed at all crossings.
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? YES [ x ] NO [ ]
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NNIFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES [x) NO[
]
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line.
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy.
E. What is land use of surrounding property?
F. U applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal?
M's
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
Sewer Project 2
Richland Creek Trunk Sewer
NWP #12
12/20/96
Acreage of Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. located on and impacted by the project.
Acres Located Acres Impacted
Crossing in Project by Crossing
S2A 0.0028 0.0002
S213 0.0260 0.0019
S2C 0.0170 0.0000
S21D 0.0150 0.0003
S2E 0.0076 0.0025
S2F 0.1420 0.0016
S2G 0.0230 0.0017
S21-1 0.0265 0.0019
S21 0.0040 0.0003
S2J 0.0070 0.0002
Total Acres on Project Site 0.2709
Total Acres Impacted by Project 0.0106

J

0

I

I I ? l ? ,A
o?J
Z56 :.
?I3 y3 \I I L.',r ?II 1
1 300
? I ( I
?; • r % .ice- c ,2
J !? ) i
Jam)
,
C

J ?I

_ , I \ -
I
+1
J
B ? ,

a;
/ r r..l ? 1 I
(Fa
I /
1
® Barrett Kays &
Associates
E-,wo--i
l Sciences
Civd Engineering
En vironmenlal £ngi-ering
Planning
L-dscnpe .4-hi,-,-
224 Fayetteville St. ?,1nll
Raleigh, NC 2 7602
[phone] Phone
(919) 8280365 Far
?\ JI 11 I /'J j ? i? ?
\/? i1
r '

?I
w f
S
Scale: i "=2000'

I

l rNK
/III ??r` l

f
1 (j
I j;

I ,
, i

/r

I ?
,l N,
11, I
r lrr-+?
1, R 3 ?

I ,V
?I
/. _
, r I
I I?i Cam.'

/- ;?
/
RICHLAND CREEK
-CRUNK SEWER
(Approximate Locations)
WAKE FOREST, N.C.
NE/4 RALEIGH 15' QUADRANGLE
35078-H5-T5-024
1967
PHOTOREVISED 1987
DMA- 52551 NE-SERIES V842

i
II
1.
AREAS OF l 1
IMPACT \ 1
0.0002AC
\ \ ° zd,

ANTI-SEEP -
COLLA'R (T,-YP.)
i
WE TLANC
M
-- WATERS IN
PROJECT SITE
0.0028:

=-? WATERS OF U.S.
SEWER PROJECT 2
i

Richland Creek
Sewer
-----CR`OS S IN Ca A
Scale : V=20'
p
AREAS IN FROJECT -
' 0.02(o5 AC
I
i
i
i'

ii -w=12
FDA
0.0o 19 AC
3EwER PROJECT-2-
Richlands Creek
ewer
CROSSING B
Scale, : Vz20'

1
1
VZ1

i?
I
? VJ ?U\
?s" ?? .
AREA) PROJECT
0.017 AC--SEWER PROJECT 2
Richland Creek
Sewer
,_- - ROSStNG C
Scale :,1"=20'
EX. WETLANDS
PROP.
WETLANDS
j
AR A IN
P OJECT
0 007 AC
JJ

I
---------- ----
? IMPACT
?? ?
AREA
O.OOS]?AC
i
Yk
?06J
P ECT
.0AC
y' y
N*4
ii
i
SEWER PROJECT 2
,Richland Creek
Sewer
CROSSING D
Scale 0'

1
WETLANDS

IMPACT AREA
0.0 AC
aazs

® AREA IN PROJECT
0-.G02-6-AC:
_

i?
WATE " S'" OF U.S.

EWER \ PROJECT 2
ichiand Creek
Sewer
CROSSING E
le :A"=20'
SS cc
IM. T AREA
0.0.01,6 AC
Mir.

\?- AREA N PROJECT
0.142 iC
! ?dw

c a
Sewer
CROSSING F
Scale : Vz20'
SEWER PROatECT 2
d Creek
Richland
AREA IN PROJECT w
0.0230 AC / w
IMPACT AREA
0.0017 AC
-C
0
N
1

1g ?`
0
00
00
0
00
O
00
0

a i
!?l
o
Li)
1A)

SE-wER-PROJECT
Richlands Cree-
??- wer
CROSSING G
Scale : V=20'
3.0 Other Anticipated Impacts
' COE
h
to
e
This section provides the additional impact information requested by t
' complete the permit applications for each type of project in the Wakefield area.
Generally, there are six project "types" that are planned to occur across the area that may
' impact streams or wetlands: 1) road construction; 2) sewer construction; 3) stormwater
utility construction; 4) lot filling; 5) dam/lake construction in residential areas; and 6)
' other projects such as streambank stabilization, power line easement vegetation clearing,
wetland enhancement/creation, and temporary deminimus construction impacts.

Major roadway and sewer construction project impact permits have been applied for, and
' are contained in Section 2 of this report. Locations of these major projects have been
predetermined by governmental agencies for the most part, not the applicants, as
' described in the permit applications. Where possible, wetland and water impacts have
been avoided and minimized.

' The additional potential impacts which have not yet been applied for?are described
d
d
h
i
l
e
ave
nc
u
schematically in the following sections. These potential impacts
significant redesigns of all parts of the residential and golf course properties to minimize
and avoid wetlands and waters impacts where practicable. Conceptual plans for the

' commercial and shopping center applicant's projects have not yet included rigorous
avoidance and minimization efforts. For example the total linear feet of stream impacts
' associated with the conceptual plans exceeds 150 feet. Once the commercial developer
decides how to proceed with the development of individual commercial lots, a plan for
' mitigation of these stream impacts, as well as an alternative analysis will be presented as
part of that applicant's future project applications.

All available site planning information, as provided by the anticipated permit applicants
' has been used to quantify the potential impacts associated with the various developments
in the area. It should be noted that the residential developments are in various stages of
H:\cl ients\wakefA9612021\reports\wetpermit.doc

n

0

site plan approval by City of Raleigh. A significant portion of the residential
development has been approved (over 500 ac.). Site planning has not developed as
quickly on the commercial tracts. The commercial owner is at this time uncertain
whether they or individual parcel owners will be responsible for permitting or stormwater
management associated with the conceptual plans presented in this report.
Preliminary stormwater planning has been completed for the entire site under full build-
out conditions. A complete Stormwater management plan will be submitted in the
future, but preliminary results are included herein to facilitate the permitting process
regarding location and size of facilities.
These conceptual plans have been presented to and reviewed by the N. C. Division of
Water Quality wetlands and stormwater personnel on January 29, 1997. In accordance
with the City of Raleigh Stormwater Management Measures (15A NCAC 2H .1008),
calculations were based on methods described in "Controlling Urban Runoff: A Practical
Manual for Planning and Designing Urban BMPs" (MWCOG, 1987). The site was
divided into 15 hydrologic sub-basins for modeling runoff volumes and pollutant loads.
Land use and soil data were combined within each sub-basin to calculate a weighted
runoff coefficient which was used to convert annual rainfall into annual runoff from each
sub-basin. Pollutant loads were calculated by multiplying the runoff volume by the event
mean concentration (EMC) of various pollutants including suspended solids, BOD,
COD, total phosphorus, dissolved phosphorous, total nitrogen, total keldjahl nitrogen,
total copper, total lead, and total zinc. The EMCs were obtained from the "Results of the
Nationwide Urban Runoff Program: Final Report" (EPA, 1983), These values were
developed by statistical analysis of pollutant concentrations in urban runoff from
monitored sites throughout the US.
To achieve a minimum of 85% suspended solids removal, wet detention basins were
designed using methods described in "Stormwater Best Management Practices"
(DEHNR, 1995). The proposed stormwater management plan includes construction of
HAd ients\wakefi\9612021\reports\wetpermit.doc

two wet detention basins to treat runoff from the commercial portions of the site
combined with wetland creation and enhancement to treat runoff from the residential
' i
l
i
d 7
d
h
li
8
i
f
h
d
-acre wet pon
nary ana
ys
-acre an
s
on t
e pre
m
s,
port
ons o
t
e property. Base
' are required to achieve the 85% TSS removal associated with the two commercial areas
of the site. A total of 15 acres of wetlands creation and/or enhancement are required to
' treat the runoff from the residential areas, and can also function as mitigation for
unavoidable impacts to wetlands. The additional wetland creation for residential runoff
' treatment can be achieved by expanding the existing wetlands below the residential
portions of the property.
1
In order to develop maximum potential impact estimates, potential stormwater pollutant
' removal requirements, mitigation scenarios and other comprehensive plans, the following
assumptions have been made:
' 1. The S & EC delineation is used, even though that delineation is pending
reconsideration by the Corps.
' 2. Lot Filling dictated by the available site plans is 100%, even though
construction plane will reduce this amount.
hi
h
t
t
d
id
h
f
d
f
di
3
S
g
wa
er
o e
ge.
tream w
t
s are
rom e
ge o
or
nary
.
' 4. Development of commercial and residential areas does not include semi-
pervious construction materials.
' 5. Offsite stormwater is untreated.
6. The wet detention pond located on the commercial tracts will require 1 /3 of its
' surface area to be located in wetlands.
' Typical designs for roadways, sewer crossings, bank stabilization, golf course cart paths,
stormwater outfalls for the residential tracts, and other impacts are included in the
' following sections of this report. A matrix which quantifies impacts by project type and
permit applicant is included.

H:\cl Tents\wakefA961202I Veports\wetpermit.doc
fl

C

J

Table 1 - Total Impacts to Jurisdictional Areas at the Wakefield Site (acres)
Applicant
Jointly Anvil and Jointly Wakefield Jointly Atlantic
Project Wakefield Wakefield Developers and Atlantic Real Real Estate Total by Project
Developers Developers Hale Irvin Golf Estate and Others Others Type
Road Construction
Relocate Falls of the Neuse Road 0.21 0.21
Plantation Drive-Resid. Collector 0.26 0.26:
Commercial Collector 0.06 0.06
Residential Streets 0.58 0.58
Commercial Streets ?(0.07) ? (0.07) ?(0.07) 0.07
Golf Cart Paths 0.01 0.01
Sewer Construction
Neuse River Trunk 0.01 0.01
Richland Creek Trunk 0.01 0.01
Richland Thb Trunks, 0.01 0.01
Residential Lot Collectors 0.03 0.03
Commercial Lot Collectors ? ? ? ?
Stormwater
Residential Conveyance 0.00
Residential Stream Outfalls 0.07 0.07
Commercial Conveyance ? ? ? ?
Commercial Stream Outfalls ? ? ? ?
Wet Detention Basins ?(2.67) ?(2.67) ?(2.67) 2.67
Lot Filling
Residential 1.70 1.70
Commercial ?(0.20) ?(0.20) ?(0.20) 0.20
Other
Dam/Lake Construction 0.17 0.17
Power Line Clearing 1.06 1.06
Streambank Stabilization 0.11 ? ? 0.11
Direct Impact Total
7
by Applicant 0.21 2.84 0.12 .06 (?-3.0) 0.00 (?-2.94) 1.06 (?-4.0) 7.23
Note: Shaded lines denote outstanding applications (see Section 2 of this report)
?- Denotes undecided permit applicant

J

it

LEGEND
ROADS misc
0.00 AC
0-, STORM DRAIN
, WETLANDS IMPACT
0m00 AC AREA OF IMPACT
0
00 AC GOLF CART CROSSINGS
. WETLANDS IMPACT
BANK SABILIZATION ALONG
0
00 AC GOLF COURSE (SEE DETAIL)
.
SEWER

FILING OF WETLANDS
x.,00 AC' / WATERS OF US
1000 T TOTAL LENGTH
OF IMPACT
10,00 AC TOTAL

AREA
OF IMPACT

EW WATERS OF US
AREA IN AC
0
- ??-, TOTAL AREA
ASSOCIATED
IMPACTED WATERS OF US
DISTURBANCE ?_ IN IMPOUNDMENT

Road Construction Projects

C?

' January 31, 1997
Mr. Lamarr Bunn
' Barrett Kays and Assoc.
224 Fayetteville Street Mall
Suite 100
P.O. Box 2979
Raleigh, NC 27602-2979

1

CI

City Of CRaleig
North Carolina
RE: Wakefield Street Requirements
Dear Mr. Bunn:
This letter is to confirm that the general street layout within the portions of the
Wakefield development that have been submitted to date for approval by the City of
Raleigh is in substantial compliance with the City's development regulations.
As you know, the city staff has spent substantial effort coordinating this development
project with your firm in an attempt to help you minimize stream crossings and negative
impacts to wetlands. The City's development regulations would typically require
significantly greater numbers of street interconnections between adjacent tracts
(typically at least one connection per 1,500 feet of adjacent property lines). We have
waived this requirement in several areas within Wakefield. As a result, the remaining
stream crossings and wetlands encroachments by proposed streets, in my view, have
been minimized as much as possible.
In early January, I had two telephone conversations with Mr. Eric Alsmeyer (Corps of
Engineers Regulatory Project Manager) in which I advised him in substantial detail of
the City's development regulations as they pertained to the Wakefield development. I
also spoke with him today to advise him that, for brevity's sake, I would reference those
conversations in this letter rather than reiterate the details of our street regulations.
If further information is needed, please call me at 890-3430.
Sincerely,
Edison H. Johnson, Jr., P.E.
Transportation Services Engineer
Raleigh Dept. of Transportation
OFFICES • 222 WEST HARGETT STREET • POST OFFICE BOX 590 • RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602
Recycled Paper
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
N
,
W F
40 y
?? ? : Fes->y Oz
y F- f- a ?
o gf 5
.§Y g ?wW Oa
u
raz

w ps
z,
J
K W
'o I

s
Cti vI ; d ¢ W y
LLW 123 LL6
® O Z m
Yd
J
}- a
3 V
y
ate`'
?O WNCE f

:3

r

I"
i.
a -
r`
i
J
tas

3
C--P
3
a
a r-
i
vi
i z
o
o I

a o

"

w II

Q C
O

i
z
I 0-
_ 0-
0 a
w a
N
o a
z ?
w
l
a
?

A

V

.
O
m
W_
I
S
F-
U
z
w
e
U
Q
a
¢
U
a
3
N -
w w
O a
N >
O
Z
¢ N
rI w
w K
a >
J
Q
U
CL
N
w
. N
J W
x
S Q
o cn
N
b.
iJ
O
O
e
J
J
}
0
Z
U ?
W _
N I
O Z
Z O
W K
Q.
o ¢
W
J ?
w I
N
W
Q
J
(N
w
a
a
w
W
U
Z
O
U
D
U
O
L,
z
w
w
?j
N
A
U
0
0
z
? I
z a:
z a
w a
< 13 I
J I
w ?
m m ? i m m
/
!f i
m m m m i m i m m i ?
OmO368AC
s
OmO373AC
?Tn
7771
l1
-OPEN SP
QREENWAY E
YMCA
140 1 -WAF
?C
APTS - 1
0 mihw a %ir a___a c
ROA
AN
r r \.
0
y
400L SITE
LAKE
T ?
1 7T ?.
44
m= r r r r r r r r ? am
co
OPEN SPACE As Q
O-1A
CLUBOHOUSE
S
m r = m

a-13

ROADS
C-1

`'!49 *\\\\IWSHWINMEN9% M
.o
466
115
j
SHOPPING CENTER
CP&L
SUB STATION
0.0115 AC
r.vv-r, 'n%a APTS - 2 k
CENTER
)115 AC
„
L ------ - - - - -------------- - ------------- -
GREENWAY EASEMENT
FROM CL OF RICHLAND CREEK
CITY OF RALEIGH GREENWA•

SIP
OQ
0
4

O
1+
'o
APTS - 4
m m ow m
115
?01

17.86 Acres
0.0115
RETAIL
72.04 Acres
OFFICE
10.41 Aci
ro Q. 0 A D
OFFICE 1 MULTI-FAMILY
8.75 Acres 1 25.03 Acres i?
5 AC
.0115 11C
o?
1n RESTA
II MIXED
35. A

OFFICE/
COMMUNITY
/ SERVICE
15.8 Acres
.0115

,7
i
MULTI-FAMILY t...? "
20.94 Acres
MF-1

A1 ! A C
20.52 Acres
OFFICE
14.72 Acres
HOTEL
X10.3 Acres
ENTERTAINMENT
24.13 Acres
ROADS
B=3
ASSISTED LIVING/
OFFICE
14.45 Acres
SFD - 3

OPEN SPACE
\ I I % ! COMMERCIAL
sm- PED/51KE
11 EASEMENT ?.i
0.0115
0.0115 AC

Q
/ 4?
Q?
4C

ROADS
C-3
m m
cr
CD
n
O
D
C
n
O
i
WETLANDS
CREEK
AREA OF IMPACI
AREA OF DISTURBANCE
ANTISEEP COLLARS
NOTE:
ORIGINAL GRADE TO BE
RESTORED AFTER CONSTRUCTION
WETLANDS
TYPICAL WETLANDS SEWER CROSSINGS
NOT TO SCALE
20' CITY OF RALEIGH
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT

APTS - 3
48.45 AC

?N
MF -
LAKE + OP.
1

1

' Other Projects:
1
Lot Fills
Dam/Lake Construction
Power Line Clearing

Streambank Stabilization

1

J
J -
F
C
L
Q
W
Q
HiVd
i2jvo
s3PJVA
/V\/?J Hldd i2JVO

L
C
C
C
L
C
C
C
V?
? T
U
O f-
U
1-
Of d
a
Of
Q
U ?
LL.
C-)
<
U
j U Z O
V ! O

Z w Z

Q C7
?

W F
M
J
Q
U F-
_

? \
\ ??'Gyti
\ J
I
I
?.
6\ \

i U

J-- d8 AO d 1
\\?
III
/?
1
I ?,
1 l l
l I \?/
?
??
?
1-I I MI
III=III-II/???, N
o
I I I I I I I I ? I I- \///? ? v
=III ? I j? w
III-I
\ ?

____ ? ? ? \
Q
I-III >
1111111
Ed o 0

o
-1 I I ; I.
I I ; /%\??
c
II
I I I
?/jam/
I Q ?
a \?
I I I
o W d8 J0 d 1

a U
HlVd
12id0 lc-r i
U j

s312Jdn
M/6 HiVd l?IbO
o \//

I
I
I

b

F
4.0 Mitigation Issues to be Considered

L

This section describes mitigation efforts planned for the site which will offset
unavoidable wetland impacts based on development plans. As detailed below, these
measures include development and construction plans designed to mitigate the impacts
quantified in Section 3.0.
4.1 Stormwater Management
Preliminary stormwater planning has been completed for the entire site under full build-
out conditions. A complete Stormwater management plan will be submitted in the
future, but preliminary results are included herein to facilitate the permitting process
regarding location and size of facilities.
These conceptual plans have been presented to and reviewed by the N. C. Division of
Water Quality Wetlands and stormwater personnel on January 29, 1997. In accordance
with the City of Raleigh Stormwater Management Measures (15A NtAC 2H .1008),
calculations were based on methods described in "Controlling Urban Runoff: A Practical
' Manual for Planning and Designing Urban BMPs" (MWCOG, 1987). The site was
divided into 15 hydrologic sub-basins for modeling runoff volumes and pollutant loads.
Land use and soil data were combined within each sub-basin to calculate a weighted
runoff coefficient which was used to convert annual rainfall into annual runoff from each
sub-basin. Pollutant loads were calculated by multiplying the runoff volume by the event
mean concentration (EMC) of various pollutants including suspended solids, BOD,
' COD, total phosphorus, dissolved phosphorous, total nitrogen, total keldjahl nitrogen,

' total copper, total lead, and total zinc. The EMCs were obtained from the "Results of the
l
h
"
ese va
ues were
(EPA, 1983), T
Nationwide Urban Runoff Program: Final Report
' developed by statistical analysis of pollutant concentrations in urban runoff from
monitored sites throughout the US.

'
The proposed stormwater management plan includes construction of two wet detention
basins to treat runoff from the commercial portions of the site combined with wetland
creation and enhancement to treat runoff from the residential portions of the property. To
achieve a minimum of 85% suspended solids removal, wet detention basins were
designed using methods described in "Stormwater Best Management Practices"
' (DEI NR, 1995).. Based on the preliminary analysis, 8-acre and 7-acre wet ponds are
required to achieve the 85% TSS removal associated with the two commercial areas of
' the site. As shown on Figure , the locations for the detention basins has been
generally selected in order to estimate wetland impacts described in Section 3.0 No
' impacts are expected for the basin on the west side of Richland Creek while
approximately 2.67 acres will be impacted by the basin on the east side of Richland
'
Creek.
The additional wetland creation for residential runoff treatment can be achieved by
' expanding the existing wetlands below the residential portions of the property. Based on
methods described in "Design of Stormwater Wetland System" (MWCOG, 1992), a total
' of approximately 15 acres of wetlands creation and/or enhancement are required to treat
the runoff from the residential areas. These additional on-site wetland areas can also
' function as mitigation for unavoidable impacts to wetlands in other areas.
4.2 Additional Erosion Control Mitigation

C

Engineering controls will be used throughout the site to minimize erosion due to
development activities, including:
1) Velocity dissipators will be installed at all Stormwater outfalls to reduce
erosion potential
2) Bank stabilization along the outside meanders of all streams intersecting the
proposed golf course to reduce erosion potential
3) Golf course drainage will be directed to grassed swales or bioretention areas
and will not be directly discharged to streams

0

u

7

1
4) Pre-construction instream flows will be maintained in all streams
5) Utility conveyances (water, sewer, etc.) will be located in road right-of-ways
6) Construction plans will be developed which will significantly avoid and
reduce impacts from lot filling and temporary construction activities
4.3 Additional Creation and Rehabilitation of Jurisdictional Areas
Two new lakes are proposed for construction in the residential portions of the site. These
new lakes will become additions to the total jurisdictional area at the site since they will
be hydrologically connected via jurisdictional areas (streams) to navigable waters of the
US. The total area of these proposed lakes is approximately 8.8 acres and they will
provide significant pollutant removal functions on the residential portions of the site.
Stream rehabilitation along all golf course crossings will reduce current sediment loads
from these areas. Based on high erosion rates from historic farming practices in upland
areas of the site, significant sediment deposits are located along most of the streams at the
site. Continuing erosion of these depositional areas will be minimized by the stream
rehabilitation efforts to provide overall improvements in water quality.
4.4 Quantification of Mitigation Efforts
This section provides preliminary quantification of proposed on-site mitigation measures.
Quantifiable mitigation efforts include creation of new lakes and wetlands, construction
of wet detention basins, stream rehabilitation. The mitigation efforts are presented in
relation to the potential impacts for each permit applicant in Table 2.

1

r
r

L
?I!

L
i
Table 2 - Mitigative Measures (acres)
Applicant
Jointly Anvil and Jointly Wakefield Jointly Atlantic
Wakefield Wakefield Developers and Atlantic Real Real Estate
Mitigation Measure Developers Developers Hale Irwin Golf Estate and Others Others Total
New Lakes 8.8
Wetland Creation 15
Wet Detention Basins 15
Stream Rehabilitaion
Total Mitigation Acreage 0 23.8 0 15 0 0 38.8
Total Impact Acreage 0.21 2.84 0.12 .06 ?-3.0 0.00 ?-2.94 1.06 ?-4.0 7.23
Net Mitigation: Imact Ratio 5.37

C 2? Iq. RESOLUTION
NIIM.BF-R (1996) 304
CL A RESOLUTION TO
AMEND TEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN...
f. CP-14-96
WMMrA S, the purpose of the Comprehensive Plan is to provide
general guidance to City agencies, other Dublic agencies,
prsvate v s and organizations as they prepare detailed
Plans. P=grams or ordinances; and
WMMMAS, it is the intent of the City council to maintain and
amend this plan as the official statement of city Council policy
, -ftc1ft=g the future development of the City of Raleigh; and
WHO-REAS? the City has recently annexed an area north of the
Reuse River between Falls of the Neuse Road and Capital
Boulevard (US 1) known -as Wakefield, an area that is not
currently included in Greater Raleigh urban Area Thoroughfare
Plan but is within the area Covered by the Town of Wake Forest
Thoroughfare Plan, both of which are elements of the Capital
Area Metropolitan Thoroughfare Plan; and
W" REAS, after a careful review of urban form, park,
t_aasaortation and street needs within the Wakefield area greenwa,
of the
North Dist_--ic t, am_enelments are proposed to the urban form,
thoroughfares and collectors and park/greenway systems in this
_ gene_-al area .
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY _ TEE CITY COUNCIL OF RALEIGB, NORTH
CAROLINA that the Comp-rehensive Plan be amended by adopting
CP-14-96 Wakefield Area II-ban Farm, ?arks, Thoroughfares and
Collector St= eet Pm?eAdmentz wish its accampanying maps
B IT FUF= R RE.SOLVED tee= t e Capital Area Me-r-cc' *-
Thcrcu, :fare Plan be age.^.da_ as deemed a --r^=-iate ?
p_ _ s-,, i ect
=ul =ma a.... C_cn by the C___aa' A= an Me-=! i •A y
Organ:zat_.rn (-C:. a.:c .. -?...*? P?ar.^.:.'Zg
(T CC a.d tie N. Board C_`0 T. arse o-=t_or.
inc_ude he followinc tho: 2g:+.==. Z;,er. er..s es Sa..^. or. t !:e
PART 1 - Amenr4=ents requiring NCDOT 6 IK?O Cone:.-rence
1. Designation of existing Capital Boulevard (US, I) as a•
Proposed freeway mayor thoroughfare (City subclassification -
principal arterial, gateway car:-idor) from the c-arrent
thoroughfare plan boundary at the Neuse Rive: northward to NC 98
in Wake Forest, including proposed interchanges at US IA and at
the proposed NC 98 Bypass.
2• Deletion of a proposed
approximately 1,500 feet east of
Road beginning at its crossing of
where it ties back into existing F
major thoroughfare located
existing Falls of the Neuse
the Neuse River nor-,sward to
311s cf the Neuse Road.
3• Addition of a proposed ma?'cr thoroughfare
subclassification - secondary ??e: (City.
Falls of the Neuse Boulevard, begi-=.L- g) ?attt.eeabove referenced
crossing of the Neuse Rive-*- and extending in a northeasterly
direction to intersect with US I (Capital Boulevard) opposite US
1-A with a proposed grade-separated interchange as indicated in
Item #1.
4. Deletion of the realigned portion of existing Falls of the
Neese Road in the vicinity Old NC 98 West.
5. Addition of a proposed minor thoroughfare generally parallel
to, and approximately 1,500 feet west of, Capital Boulevard
from the proposed NC 98 Bypass to the proposed Falls of the
Neuse Boulevard.
6. Addition of a proposed minor thoroughfare beginning at
existing Falls of the Neese Road a?r*+te1y 4400 feet north
of its C=ssinq of the Neese river and %extending in a
southeasterly direction to intersect vibe the proposed Falls of
the Neese Boulevard.
PART 2 - City Roadway Classification Amendments .
1. Change the major thoroughfare subclassification of existing
Falls of the Neese Road and Old NC 98 from "secondary arterial"
to "noa-arterial" beginning at its intersection with the
Proposed Falls of the Neese Boulevard northward to the proposed
NC 98 Bypass.
2. Subclassify the proposed NC 98 Bypass as a secondary arterial,
major thoroughfare.
Adopted: 12/3/96
Dis:ributicn: City Cc-sncil Inspections
Cif Manager City Atrc^av
Pla?*?g { 3) Transpor`?tan

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Ja mes B. Hunt, Jr., G ove mor
Jonathan B. Howesy Secretary
Steven J. Levitas, Deputy Secretary
A MIwMAI
741
ON% WOO
C) EHNR
Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
FAX:[phone]
FAX TO: 1 /frheg, I FAX NUMBER:
FROM:
PHONE:
NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET:
?d?k.fie l?
5???? Mr f

?, J`,, ? ?a? ?, p y? _ sr? ?J?/ ?r???b©?1 f 1?? i?/,?) 2-? 1o t/?
,/l(?' a?j Iyl,/lO?S ?I.0 '?-.!? lit
?av 417 09?2b _ ???,, Wr s 5 '?) ?? -? rah r? 1 t? lj
11-2

i
?i w? 5?? - Ma j dv<_ we f(a alo1 ? -64 ?a 0? C ?
4 l 4. dollae f't ?o -(S G? l l L-4-Q ?br /mot Df l
T55
l r,?e f We basl`vi ??- 767 C- 605-74
- 5? rya y i`d 7J
.2-?dtS ?`"`?ccG
Q "d r
1 fil l r (?/? 1G lGl k al q, l e-a' a b4 e - w-.-, t ? S
_?__. _ _________.:___..?_.---___.._ aS,?172Q7??Qb ._..?R/?? ..??'1?1 .'??2=111its?._.?.??I.??_..©?_.___...__ ___----__ --_._..._.
tit ap?y??.>O,? ? ??,?/ _ ? .?rD?'I .?, ?? ?SD?o?_._ .._..._? ` ;?-??____ _??0 p.?_. _- ----
1 ?9 _. __ _
..__ ___-_. _ . _. . yid ! ?"_ 5......O?a? i%?0? `n a_ -??_.??? -?, ???? _ /?°'??
rI J ?' ? ?'
r
11 z 417 7u
Wakefield Stormwater Management Plan
SUMMARY INFORMATION
Total Richland Creek Basin (ac) 9635
Site is approximately 22% (ac) 2120
Site contributes 17% of existing Total Suspended Solids (TSS) load
Site contributes 38% of future TSS. load
Stormwater Management Options will reduce future TSS loads by 85% to a level equivalent
to 30% to 70% of existing estimated loads
General Future Land Use Onsite
Area (ac) % of site % of watershed
Open/Woods 300 14% 3%
Golf Course 190 9% 2%
Residential 855 40% 9%
Commercial 465 22% 5%
Institutional 180 8% 2%
Roads 100 5% 1%
Water 30 1% 0%
Total 2120 100% 22%
G{dc? ?G afou' fV 6y?+?f

Wakefield Stormwater Management Plan
Scenario 1 - Regional Wet Detention Facility
Single wet detention structure designed to remove 85% of TSS from the entire
Richland Creek watershed and site drainage to the Neuse River
Drainage Area (ac)
Subbasins Included
Surface Area of Perm. Pool
@ 6' avg depth (ac)
@ 9' avg depth (ac)
Storage of Temp. Pool
Volume (ac-ft)
Total Storage
Volume @ 6' avg depth (ac ft)
Volume @ 9' avg depth (ac ft)
Approximate Footprint (ac)
Approximate Construction Cost
Approx. Annual Maint. Cost (5%)
Advantages
Disadvantages
Wet Detention
Pond # 1-1
9635
all
59.7
45.3
197
555
469
69
$ 24,087,500
$ 1,204,375
Single point of Operation and Maintenance
Treat runoff from entire basin
Possibly minimizes conveyance infrastructure
Not as efficient at controlling larger storm events
Construction and O&M costs not easily apportioned
40
Wakefield Stormwater Management Plan
Scenario 2 - Four Wet Detention Facilities
Multiple wet detention structures designed to remove 85% of TSS from runoff directly associated
with the site, including drainage to Richland Creek and the Neuse River
Wet Detention Wet Detention Wet Detention Wet Detention
Pond # 2-1 Pond # 2-2 Pond # 2-3 Pond # 2-4
Drainage Area (ac) 429.2 581.7 468.0 605.1
Subbasins Included 5,7,10,12 1,2,3,4 6,9,13 8,11,14,15
Surface Area of Perm. Pool
@ 6' avg depth (ac) 7.3 5.3 4.3 6.3
@ 9' avg depth (ac) 5.3 3.9 3.1 4.7
Storage of Temp. Pool
Volume (ac-ft) 23.3 17.0 13.6 20.8
Approximate Footprint (ac) 8 6 5 7
(assumes +15% surface area of permanent pool)
Approximate Construction Cost $ 1,072,985 $ 1,454,268 $ 1,169,968 $ 1,512,745
Residential/Golf Course portion $ 1,221,585 $ 830,677 $ 1,240,451
Commercial portion $ 1,072,985 $ 232,683 $ 339,291 $ 272,294
Approx. Annual Maint. Cost (5%) $ 53,649 $ 72,713 $ 58,498 $ 75,637
Residential/Golf Course portion $ 61,079 $ 41,534 $ 62,023
Commercial portion $ 53,649 $ 11,634 $ 16,965 $ 13,615
Total Construction Cost $ 5,209,965
Residential/Golf Course portion $ 3,292,713
Commercial portion $ 1,917,252
Total Annual Maint. Cost $ 260,498
Residential/Golf Course portion $ 164,636
Commercial portion $ 95,863
Advantages increased efficiency
Can be designed to easily exceed pollutant removal goals
Construction and O&M costs can be apportioned by land use
Disadvantages Increased conveyance infrastructure
Multiple points of O&M
Note: Costs for construction and O&M of conveyance infrastructure are not included in these estimates
.r
Wakefield Stormwater Management Plan
Scenario 3A- Wet Detention Facilities plus Wetlands

Two wet detention structures designed to remove 85% of TSS from runoff directly associated with high
impact areas combined with wetlands enhancement to address runoff from low impact areas.
Wet Detention Wet Detention Stormwater
Pond # 3-1 Pond # 3-2 Wetlands
Drainage Area (ac) 429.2 856.2 798.6
Subbasins Included 5,7,10,12 8,9,11,13,14,15 1,2,3,4,6
Surface Area of Perm. Pool
@ 6' avg depth (ac) 7.3 8.7
@ 9' avg depth (ac) 5.3 6.5
Storage of Temp. Pool
Volume (ac-ft) 23.3 29.0
Approximate Footprint (ac) 8 10 16
(assumes +15% surface area of permanent pool)
Approx. Construction Cost $ 1,072,985 $ 2,140,538 $ 800,000
Residential/Golf Course portion $ 1,583,998 $ 648,000
Commercial portion $ 1,072,985 $ 556,540 $ 152,000
Approx. Annual Maint. Cost (5%) $ 53,649 $ 107,027 $ 24,000
Residential/Golf Course portion $ 79,200 $ 19,440
Commercial portion $ 53,649 $ 27,827 $ 4,560
Total Construction Cost $ 4,013,523
Residential/Golf Course portion $ 2,231,998
Commercial portion $ 1,781,525
Total Annual Maint. Cost $ 184,676
Residential/Golf Course portion $ 98,640
Commercial portion $ 86,036
Advantages Maximizes treatment efficiency
Minimizes conveyance infrastructure and O&M
Construction costs more easily apportioned
Onsite wetland mitigation
Lowest cost alternative
Disadvantages O&M costs not easily apportioned
Note: Costs for construction and O&M of conveyance infrastructure are not included in these estimates

Wakefield Stormwater Management Plan
Scenario 313- Preliminary Recommendation - Wet Detention Facilities plus Wetlands
Excluding coverage of Park and School areas
?Od
V VO
l?
Two wet detention structures designed to remove 85% of TSS from runoff directly associated with high
impact areas combined with wetlands enhancement to address runoff from low impact areas.
Wet Detention Wet Detention Stormwater
Pond # 3-1 Pond # 3-2 Wetlands
Drainage Area (ac) 429.2 607.3 798.6
Subbasins Included 5,7,10,12 8,9,11,13,14,15 1,2,3,4,6
Surface Area of Perm. Pool
@ 6' avg depth (ac) 7.3 6.2
@ 9' avg depth (ac) 5.3 4.6
Storage of Temp. Pool
Volume (ac-ft) 23.3 20.4
Approximate Footprint (ac) 8 7 16
(assumes +15% surface area of permanent pool)
Approx. Construction Cost $ 1,072,985 $ 1,518,143 $ 800,000
Residential/Golf Course portion $ 1,123,425 $ 648,000
Commercial portion $ 1,072,985 $ 394,717 $ 152,000
Approx. Annual Maint. Cost (5%) $ 53,649 $ 75,907 $ 24,000
Residential/Golf Course portion $ 56,171 $ 19,440
Commercial portion $ 53,649 $ 19,736 $ 4,560
Total Construction Cost $ 3,391,128
Residential/Golf Course portion $ 1,771,425
Commercial portion $ 1,619,702
Total Annual Maint. Cost $ 153,556
Residential/Golf Course portion $ 75,611
Commercial portion $ 77,945
Advantages Maximizes treatment efficiencv
Minimizes conveyance infrastruc?? ?? and O&M
Construction costs more easily apportioned
Onsite wetland mitigation
Lowest cost alternative
Disadvantages O&M costs not easily apportioned
Note: Costs for construction and O&M of conveyance infrastructure are not included in these estimates
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 5U°
RO. BOX 1890
A\TT'EPBnRY
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF January 17, 1997
Regulatory Branch
Subject: Action ID Nos. 199602047, 199700234 through 199700251,
and Nationwide Permit No. 12 (Utility Lines) and Nationwide
Permit No. 14 (Minor Road Crossing)
RECEIVED
Mr. Danny Colton ?`??? Z ? ?g97
Wakefield Developers, LLC \ \? ENVIRON
1802 Brightseat Road ?NTA! SCIcNC,E,
Landover, Maryland 20785 /
Dear Mr. Colton:
Please reference the December 20, 1996, permit applications,
submitted on your behalf by Mr. James A. Spangler of Barrett Kays
and Associates, for Department of the Army approval to discharge
fill material over 0.56 acre of jurisdictional waters and
wetlands of the United States for the proposed construction of
thoroughfare and collector roads and the proposed installation of
utility lines associated with a residential and commercial
development and an affiliated golf course. This proposed
development, containing approximately 2,400 acres, is presently
known as "Wakefield" and was formally owned by North Hills
Development, Incorporated. The site is located adjacent to and
below the headwaters of the Neuse River and Richland Creek. It
is generally bound by Falls of Neuse Road on the west; the
proposed NC-98 Bypass to the north; US-1 to the east; and the
Neuse River on the south. Additionally, the site is located
within the City of Raleigh's extraterritorial jurisdictional,
southwest of the Town of Wake Forest, in Wake County, North
Carolina.
The applications you have submitted do not include the
anticipated impacts associated with the proposed construction of
the residential development, the commercial development, or the
golf course. We would anticipate adverse environmental impacts
will be associated with the additional roads, utility line
installations, lot fills,, and golf course fills associated with
this project. Our regulations, (33CFR325), outline processing
procedures for a Department. of the Army (DA) permit. We are
required to look at "all activities which the applicant plans to
undertake which are reasonably related to the same project and
for which a DA permit would be required... District Engineers

0
should reject, as incomplete, any permit application which fails
to comply with this requirement." In addition, pursuant to
33CFR330 Appendix A(C), notification to the District Engineer
must include "any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s) or
individual permit(s) used or intended to be used to authorize any
part of the proposed project or any related activity."
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer of my regulatory staff verbally explained
our concerns to Mr. Spangler during his telephone conversations
of January 9 and 16, 1997. He outlined the fact that we have
determined that the residential development, the commercial
development, and the golf course are reasonably related to the
proposed road system and utility line system. Based upon our
conclusions, you are notified that the applications you have
submitted are not complete and therefore cannot be processed at
this time. You are advised to re-evaluate the manner in which
you have applied for our approvals and to resubmit the
applications with all required information. We will commence the
processing of your applications upon receipt of all complete and
accurate information regarding the additional jurisdictional
activities associated with the project.
Please note that the following information will likely apply
to the proposed project, particularly if your complete
application involves an Individual DA Permit. On November 15,
1989, the Department of the Army and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency signed a memorandum of agreement (MOA)
establishing procedures to determine the type and level of
mitigation necessary to comply with the Clean Water Act, Section
404(b)(1) Guidelines. This MOA, which became effective on
February 6, 1990, provides for (1) avoiding impacts to waters and
wetlands through the selection of the least damaging, practicable
alternative; (2) taking appropriate and practicable steps to
minimize impacts to waters and wetlands; and (3) compensating for
any remaining unavoidable impacts to the maximum extent
practicable and appropriate. To enable the Regulatory Branch to
process a permit application in full compliance with this MOA,
the following additional information should be provided with any
application:
a. Permits are available only for work dependent upon being
located within an aquatic site and being the least
environmentally damaging, practicable alternative. Information
2

(alternatives analysis) regarding any other practicable
alternatives, including upland alternatives, to the work for
which you have apply must be provided, as well as justification
that your selected plan is the least damaging to waters and/or
wetland areas.
b. It is necessary for you to have taken all appropriate and
practicable steps to minimize wetland losses. Please indicate
all that you have done, especially regarding development and
modification of plans and proposed construction techniques, to
minimize adverse impacts.
C. The MOA then states that appropriate and practicable
mitigation will be required for all unavoidable adverse impacts
remaining after practicable minimization has been employed.
Please outline your plan to mitigate for the projected,
unavoidable losses of waters and/or wetlands, or provide
information as to the absence of any such appropriate and
practicable measures.
Any questions or comments, and your complete Department of
the Army permit package, may be addressed to Mr. Alsmeyer at
telephone [phone], extension 23.
Sincerely,
' r1
Michael D. Smith, P.W.S.
Chief, North Section
Regulatory Branch
3

Copies Furnished:
Mr. James A. Spangler
Barrett Kays & Associates
Post Office Box 2979
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-2979
J Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Barrett Kays & Associates
December 20, 1996
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer and
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regional Office
Via Hand Delivery, December 20, 1996
Re: Joint Permit Applications for NWP 14
BKA#: 9612024
Dear Mr. Alsmeyer:
Environmental Sciences
Civil Engineering
Environmental Engineering
Planning
Landscape Architecture.
Mr. Eric Galamb
Water Quality Section
DWQ - DEHNR
?V
We are pleased to submit to you permit applications for the following projects:
1. Project 1 - Relocation of Falls of Neuse Road, Phase 1
2. Project 2 - Plantation Drive Collector Street
3. Project -3) -Commercial Collector Street
02 ?P ?O
?F
Please also find joint permit application forms, data tables, maps indicating proposed areas of
impacts, and location maps for NWP 14. All requirements of NWP 14 and state conditions will
be met. We have attempted to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands and Waters of U.S.
We have also included the City of Raleigh Comprehensive Plan Amendment Map (CP-14-96).
This was the City of Raleigh's proposed and adoption changes to add these roadways to the
City's comprehensive plans when this area was brought into the City's jurisdiction this year.
The three roadway projects are required to be built pursuant to Raleigh's comprehensive plans to
serve regional traffic movements. We believe that all three of these projects represent separate
and complete projects.
We have also enclosed a Wetland NWI Map and Soils Map indicating the general acceptability
of the future Neuse River crossing for the Phase II of Relocation of Falls of Neuse Road which is
not part of this project nor a responsibility of the current applicant. As you requested we have
computed that the end of the road as it approaches the Neuse River can shift in a "window" of
about 700 feet along the Neuse River. It is probable that the future crossing of the Neuse River
will require only a bridge. The location on the south side of the river is situated where an upland
ridge and hill comes down to the river.
224 FAYETTEVILLE STREET MALL
SUITE 100, P.O. BOX 2979
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27602-=i
TELEPHONE [phone]
H:\cl ients\wakefi\9612024\corext\ea002.doc
FACSIMILE 919 823-0365
Barrett Kays & Associates
Please contact me if you need any additional information. As we discussed with you, the
application desire to start construction as soon as possible therefore your prompt help has been
most appreciated.
Sincerely,
BARRETT KAYS & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
1
James . Spang E.I.
cc: Eric Galamb
H:\cl ients\wakefi\9612024\corext\ea002. doc
14-
g?
WAKEFIELP A?KEA
,
?` otD mac. °? ? ;??;::::^:?•M;;:::?< -•• I ? . J
r:..:
The Icccficn of c 9reernwcy • ?`, ' :•?:'.??. ` •:? ?;:?.?' _ u?.1L ?-} ?O
nec`or ccz?ss the 'rvckereld ?"?•:.?,>?:x 7,7
........
srfe from Fait Lcke to Riau `,? ?„a ° •J
cnd .. ?:?:..??`>?,,.' ?• "<= Vii'
Creed mdl be ceri ideyed t ' eMW
Ccve{c®mertt plcr s for the
Creff ?,?w^xgy,^tb' I ?'
ere feV1eWL°`fj. ?.bav,"".v• • ,...;. • ,.?; ..e.
`•?`y::?VYMw?Ni":''???,..-..yam `
1 .. '?y:;ii::"c;?w?" "?`'e?`'-;;erns<.. ` •? n. ????.??
r•-
•x;;J, a
A ZIE
.•y tom.:'`:::: +:??;.`;::'.::x?r
CC'.,S Arec=. wne'e
venic;"ic'- cc" mixec ::ses (=,'e
c::c?,e? auc:ic
I svcys cnc ceces.,;cn c? -?ec'fiens be*weo
office. ^erc cl cnd resicen;ict uses =,-a 3^ccurcy =c
L?V
7
011
zj"
RQ?(?-...- --• ?' Jr .V?/ ?,:? ?-r,
\.
r
AA
,^t LL
.J. .i', Q,.; ?\` ? f... :I ?/,1, r r ?/ .lr';+/i ?. ',?y I -? o?\ `.?;/ ..\.\ ? ?r?•C '' /? ? "/, ?/?\ i)
„
XF-
75-
,'?.?. ', ?.`..' ? ` ., 'I: ? ii, it ?l/ ,?'f.. ?:r,. ??irr i r,%.?? ;r.`, \ '; r'?•
.. : .? r ', ?.' I __,,. .,:.. r'.? ? rr??'v, ? ?. ;?,? ';i: ,r,, ?j• Q I?t??.k?i- '.4'• ?s.?,?) \,11' ? `,? '? ?1`?\
?gy
?,. ?? "!,` '^? t'n _ ? 'I : ? / -\,,? t \' ,? '`? ? \'1 i % ?' __? i _ a \t.. D I'?:?`1?. ? ? I . \?t? ? I l?:,, ? I:'r.
1.®
ilk
.,: :.,{? iI ?'O ? •,? ;\ /,I { ? \ D '"\\'` .r, ?/yrr?'rJr'???- ?\\ ,y: ?1 .. r i?' ?.t
,I
•-.,:.. :? „\ ?,•:,` , ,..p/ '?i:?, ?, I is i ?-\: \ ; \?\?ii. -\ i,? _ ? .??_,.
..,? /. ,,. \? ?.? '. i,l r i ;'.,\,Q ?.1 ,? ?,?t \ ? ? i/ p ? /., i \ iy V. ? ? ?z ?;., 1? r,? \-' ? T/ ?\'??l \\\ ?, ? •. ? L/? 1.?r \'.:
,
,,
l,• „? '•:` .':: :_?.- ;I; ?.:,.' ? i r'?':
r ,
t f ?` ??? l ? u ._ ? t-r' f,`, ",? '1l (P O % I i /1??- ??i '.? ??, ?\? \?? I \,%!i?rr -7.. .-_
;II? \ -?? i = ? I ?' Uk"t? ,?{?? -lf ? ?O\ ; ? -U? D ? 'JL01 ( ,'• % ?\t \ \ :1 ?t ? ?? Wf i>i i ?'j % 'i
;P't ? \ ? - ? 5 - S ?)r ??f•? O_o ??\ :'?_? ? O-? I ;'??Q?'. \.r ('_'' /?\-'//; `? \!r"fir
i?
/ ; 1 1
l
ej-7- r? i 1 fit
'T \` "0 '\ ,,r 1 111
ass
l
,
'
l;
O D
,
v
70
;, S 1 / u f
vr
` cv a 1 ,
.
-I I
?'!ru
l `
,
:
r
?S
•?; s 'fin x v ? ' ., N ? ;;?9: 'N '<k
q
_ a-
n
A
r?
/: is w ' e ?•
' 1> 1 • ^' tD , i m: ' `?" Try
m
oa / ? ? N`: - Ay ? /e
B ° / ... D ? N f :.w?'' ?'? me w F % ? •? D r? '-tS
l/:-e .k e l
1
v thr
,•r7 t'+?i$•?N J N y/^,?`? l?1.-y h r.,'\ „? 'Rr??W-.•?°r
A J,? t'\ C t t I', :mss ?N. N '?R13'?iyti. p'I
'::mom Su ? 4
??-? oP j rF ? '°rs yr ? D r g4L1 'r1 fi ;X ? -
} ?n n 3
\ D G ? 3 ,y N, t Y m
D
eq o 3 ? ? 3 ? lard ? , ?q
Sc,. 15840
_ o (loins sheer 13)
y' ? ? ? J ? a r•; +^,:, w 2` 1
Y `.., r,. ?.. t 0? r, , t •S' 1.: A - N:? ?,, T Mill +, :u:C r JY: i. fr
Y`.?y d .j .0? ?, 4: ?3•,..i: 3N y'fi) ? f •?. y"3} '? 1S"e ^:*':'•?_
f'
1Jr .,rt•
0
!n c N? u 0 o I?1 h" N
h. ? trf 8C.
iD ?, +t' 1 • ? s. t` ? ? , ter ? i .k,, ? t( . ?: ; ? ?
,•A
W?, `}'S'r •.: B" +Y"'` ?.,.?' ga. ..:}.. ? "•tS'" N N v n ,.
1
r1
??':..? r• ?.M ?t??:?? \ N .//?"= ` .t?'W y ? COI
i c D Icy, >r?.. Ef f'w' h., .,t •t ? '. ?2:. =
X A• ?
J.?? 4 Yvr.: frt. ,M1U D .t .N%// r~ N\``?? ,< \\ N
o R4r ? 9492-_ i .WN''/ n? 3? ?..•i '\ \\ v I?
J
N G t ? ? iI m y r - a,
t 0 1 1?. i i.0 r9 82 7/r ?: n?
W 11
w r1 ; 4 X n ;a n ?.'1?
h. dr':,"^.7V 1 ! n? f." •i+ ./?.: '.r? ?,..',?^+.-? `? Y a?s: WP ? J , ?
y . ?n
V
TOM
?X? w)?.?-. ,h .:? :.-41w.E?he"w r:+..? 'r? ,? r• C, A? .'. -._() A` .,°..'.?

Relocation of Falls of Neuse Rd.
DEM ID: ACTION ID: Phase I
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #): NWP # 14
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P .O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. Boy. 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
ATTN: MR. ;OHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMEN r.
PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: Wakefield Developers, LLC Anvil Associates, LLP
1802 Brightseat Road and 1003 High house Road, Suite
107-
2. Owners Address: 9p 20725 rarY, Nr 2711,1
3. Owners Phone Number (Home):
(Work):
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number:
Jim Spangler Barrett Kays & Associates
919-828-1903 224-jFa etteville Street Mall,Suite 100
Raleigh, Nc 976ng-?979
Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP). County: [Fake
Nearest Town or City: Raleigh
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): See -attachedsite man
Generally, past of current Falls of Neuse Road, west of US Hwy 1,
north of Neuse River
6. Name of Closest Stream/River: Richland Creek
7. River Basin: _ Neuse
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS II? YES [ ] NO ? ]
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES [ ] NO ? ]
If yes, explain.
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site:
0.2071 ac-
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
Filled: n ^? i ac
Drained:
Flooded:
Excavated:
Total Impacted: 0.2071 acres
f
12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-8 1/2" X 11" drawings only):
Construction of major thoroughfare with 6 lanes and 130' to 250' right of way;
and minor thoroughfare with 80' r.o.w.
13. Purpose of proposed work: Provide major thoroughfare connection, as shown on amended
City of Raleigh Comprehensive Plan CP-14-96, for regionwide traffic movement.
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity must be carried out in weVnds. Also, note measures
taken to minimize wetland impacts. Minimal crossings necessary to provi e road
-extension between designated terminus on comprehensive plan.
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? .. YES ] NO[
)
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES ;x ] NO[
]
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line.
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy.
E. What, is land use of surrounding property?
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal?
Q-A-0465 A. S PAnt&4?
Mko-t W r ,l 'S d+ Assoc
f-s A&EA T Fog OWNER .
I V 11
Road Project 1
Relocation of Falls of the Neuse Road
NWP #14
12/20/96
Acreage of Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. located on and impacted by the project.
Acres Located Acres Impacted
Crossing in Project by Crossing
R1A 0.0143 0.0143
R1 B 0.0460 0.0460
R1C 0.0935 0.0935
R1 D 0.0188 0.0188
R1 E 0.0245 0.0245
R1 F 0.0022 0.0022
R1 G 0.0078 0.0078
Total Acres on Project Site 0.2071
Total Acres Impacted by Project 0.2071

O`ff' V01-11,.

o
0
?0
\250
/ ` ICI 1 i L/ p = 1
J
Wit(
® Barrett Kays &
Associates
Environmental sciences
Civil Engineering
Environmental Engineering
Planning
Landscape Architecture
224 Fayetteville St. Mall
Raleigh, NC 27602
[phone] Phone
[phone] Fax
U
N
W E
.S'
Scale: 1 "=2000'
RELOCATION
OF
FALLS OF NEUSE ROAD
PHASE 1
(Approximate Locations)
WAKE FOREST, N.C.
NE/4 RALEIGH 15' QUADRANGLE
35078-H5-T5-024
1967
PHOTOREVISED 1987
DMA- 6255 1 NE-SERIES V842

w
0
? j
WATERS OF U.S.
\
i
\

OF IMPACT=

i
U q? j
Road Project 1
Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road,
Phase 1
Crossing A
Scale 1" -- 50'
? r

260
250
240

230 72" RCP
220

Road Project 1
Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road,
Phase I
Crossing A
Scale 1" -- 50'

t
R)
O
V
O
(JlI
V

V
i
V
TO
V I
I ?
O
I I v
V '
?I
I
I
A EA OF IM ACT=
l II
i
F'01
I '
rv
CD o
C CF"
I I
I li !,? I: I
iv
ITV
0
i Road Project 1
Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road,
Phase
Crossing B
Scale 1" = 50' N
i ,

230
220
210
24'x8' ARCH
i
200
190
N O O O n r".
CC CO Ln Ln Cfl CO CO CD
O O O O O O O O

ClN
-CN
N N N N
45+00 46+00 Road Project 1
Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road,
Phase
Crossing B
Scale 1" -- 50'
r

F)J
O
fU
O
Ul
(U
O
fU
O
W
O
f
I?
VV??Vl}1
O 1
J
r
r?l
i
I?
O
fU
O
0,11
R)
O
I fJ _
I I c I RI?yt ANO cRe£K
I
Road Project 1
Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road, j
Phase
Crossing C
Scale 1" = 50' I
O
I /
I /
I /
I /
I /
I/
v
i
i
1 ?
'II
I'
F)J
1
?i
1
N

AREA 0 IMPACT=0.0935 Ac
i
rv
407 = 44L aleoS
3 6ulssoJO
I aseyd
'peoll asnaN Jo
sllej 10 uolleoolebl
L IoaEIoad peoIi
00+L9 00+C J 00+6t 00+8V
N
O
co N
O
?I
C? N
O

?1 N
O
p
U1 N
O
N
O N
O
J N
O
P,
00 N
0
p
Ul
061
ON
HO?V ,0,9? O1Z

OZZ
NZ

,q
t7

1
1
F)J
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
?I
a
v
I -
fU
0
P
R-)
/ CO
18 c r `- -
/
/
I /
I /
I lr
I /
I /
I /
I / \
1 /
? i
fU 'r \
1 Project 1
Road ?
° Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road,
Phase I
Crossing D
Scale 1" = 50'
O
f
Y ? Y

240
230
i
220

72" R
CP i

210

200 I
i

O N d
O

N

N _
N

N

N

Road Project 1
i

Relocation of Falls
53+00 54+0o of Neuse Road,
Phase I a
Crossing D
Scale 1" = 50'

1 2z:711

w
z
J
WE AND AREA P E RVED
IN IDENE MEDIA
WA RS OF
IN ED MEDI
r ?
i
\ \1
Road Project 1
Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road,
Phase
Crossing E
Scale 1" -- 50'
r

250
240
230
n
E
220
12° RCP
210

Road Project 1
o N
Relocation of Falls
_
N N N N
N N N N N of Neuse Road,
Phase 1
6+00 97+00 98+00 Crossing E
Scale 1" -- 50'

`?O ,
1?3

? °o
00
1
00

Road Project 1
Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road,
Phase
Crossing F
Scale 1" = 50'
%, ?

330
320

310
300

290 54" RCP

280 i

Road Project 1
Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road,
Phase
Crossing F
Scale 1" -- 50'
w ,
I
i
10

O_
r-

g x
99
x.

00

\1
8j

Road Project 1
Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road,
Phase
Crossing G
Scale 1" = 50'
r , 0

310
300

280

270
,J 54" RCP

Road Project 1

o
?

N

N

N Relocation of Falls
of Neuse Road,

Phase 1
31+00 32+00 Crossing G
Scale 1" -- 50'
I?
Plantation Drive
DEM ID: ACTION ID: Residential Collector Street
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #): NWP #14
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER WATER QUALITY PLANNING
CORPS OF ENGINEERS DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
P.O. Box 1890 AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 P.O. Bor. 29535
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Telephone [phone] ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: Wakefield Developers, L.L.C.
2. Owners Address: 1802 Brightseat Road, Landover, MD 20
3. Owners Phone Number (Home):
(Work):
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number:
Jim Spangler BArrorr VnWc AgSg612t28
919-828-1903 224 Fayetteville Street Mall, Suite 100
Raleigh. N 7602-797A
5 Location of «•ork (MUST ATTACH k AP). County: Wake
Nearest Town or City: Raleigh
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): See attached site map
Generally, east of current Fall of h N iv;p grmfi wP t. of
Richland Creek, connecting to future NC 98 Bypass
6. Name of Closest Stream/River: Richland Creek
7. River Basin:
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS II? YES (] NO [x ]
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES [ ] NO ix ]
If yes, explain.
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site:
0.2134 ac-
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
Filled:
Drained:
Flooded:
Excavated:
0.2572 ac.
Total Impacted: 0.2572 oaa.
12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-8 1/2" X 11 drawings only):
Construction of residential collector with 4 lanes and 60' to 901 . right of way
13. Purpose of proposed work: Provide residential collector connection, as shown on
amended City of Ral eioh CmmnrPtlPtICiVP P1 C'P t Q for 7 nn *ia
-E],.q, S affix mnvcma t
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also, note measures
taken to minimize wetland impacts. Minimal crossings- necessary to provide road extension
between designated terminus on the comprehensive plan.
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? YES i ] NO[
]
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES'-x1 NO[
]
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line.
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy.
E. What is land use of surrounding property?
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal?
A? ? ?VAf , Ld-
A-S ANts6?1
f? K o wt ?Af?it c -r
4, - f
r
Road Project 2
Plantation Drive Residential Collector Street
NWP #14
12/20/96
Acreage of Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. located on and impacted by the project.
Acres Located Acres Impacted
Crossing in Project by Crossing
R2A* 0.0440 0.0613
R213 0.0142 0.0142
R2C* 0.1250 0.1515
R2D 0.0131 0.0131
R2E 0.0171 0.0171
Total Acres on Project Site 0.2134
Total Acres Impacted by Project 0.2572
* Impact outside Right of Way due to slope of fill
v t

A) 11
5 _ o

?y F? I
250
Urf

/ \
o
1 4
??? ? 7 1 302 r?? ?'
?
?
• o?
?? ? ?
? \ ??
?
?I,
._
'
.
,
\J
?
?
'0
-?•\?. ?.k? ?11 t/ ? l '
? I ? -??/ ? ?
,•?\/? ll ?/' ? Ili ?\
?
?: 17 \

?f
\J 1

i I 4 m_ ? 1J /\O? ?? 2111,

PLANTATION DRIVE
N RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR
® Barrett Kays & (Approximate Locations)
Associates
Environmental Sciences W E
Civil Engineering
Environmental Engineering WAKE FOREST, N.C.
Planning S NE14 RALEIGH 15' QUADRANGLE
Landscape Architecture 35078-H5-T5-024

1967
224 Fayetteville St. Mall
Raleigh, NC 27602 PHOTOREVISED 1987
[phone] Phone Scale: 1 tt=2000' DMA- 5255 1 NE-SERIES V842
[phone] Fax

m

IMPA

Road Project 2
Plantation Drive
Collector Street
Crossing A
Scale 1" -- 50'
? I

6
N
13
?J
ARE OF IMP CT=0.0142 Ac

r,
r,
)
r
Road Project 2
Plantation Drive
Collector Street
Crossing B
co Scale 1" -- 50'

Y,... y0
i
W
n?
I o
!J

d

Road Project 2
Plantation Drive
Collector Street
Crossing C
Scale 1" = 50'

,J
FO
'n
(_I1 U

QT?
CP
CO

9
„
,

Road Project 2
Plantation Drive
Collector Street
Crossing D
Scale 1" -- 50'

rr
?r
r
C)
,
A A F IMPACT=0.0171 A
WATERS OF U.S. ,-
,
jn
Road Project 2
Plantation Drive
Collector Street
Crossing E
Scale 1" -- 50'
r
DEM ID:
W;

Raleigh
Nationwide Pern-it Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #): NWT #14
JOINT FORM FOR
NationRide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER WATER QUALITY PLANNING
CORPS OF ENGINEERS DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
P.O. Box 1890 AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 P.O. Bor. 29535
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Telephone [phone] ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: Atlantis Raal Fcf-nta rgzpgrgtjee
2. Owners Address: 100 Capitola Drive, Suite 309, Durham, NC 27713
3. Owners Phone Number (Home):
(Work):
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number:
Jim Spangler Barrett Kays & Associates
919-828-1903 224 Fayetteville Street Mal Suite 100
Raleigh. NC 27602-2979
5 Location of -•ork r.MI?ST ATTACH MAP). County* Wake
Nearest Town or City:
ACTIONID: Commercial Collector Street
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): See attached site map
Generally, west of US Hwy 1, connecting future Fall's of the Neuse Road
to future Plantation Drive
6. Name of Closest StreanvRiver: Richland Creek
7. River Basin: Neuse
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS II? YES [ ] NO [xl
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES [) NO F
If yes, explain.
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site:
0.0581 oc,
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
Filled:
0.0593 6Xt_
Drained:
Flooded:
Excavated:
Total Impacted: 0.0593 acres

Road Project 3
Commercial Collector Street
NWP #14
12/20/96
Acreage of Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. located on and impacted by the project.
Acres Located Acres Impacted
Crossing in Project by Crossing
R3A 0.0098 0.0098
R36 0.0054 0.0054
R3C 0.0102 0.0102
R3D* 0.0327 0.0339
Total Acres on Project Site 0.0581
Total Acres Impacted by Project 0.0593
* Impact outside Right of Way due to slope of fill

-? / /)I // - ? '? I 00 \ ??• -,?? /I ICI ?/__I/?C/?
U!
F i

?;-
A- -
?-
- ;

P. ing
!!

Oll It,

N
Barrett Kays &
® COMMERCIAL COLLECTORS

(Approximate Locations)
Associates
Environmental Sciences W E
Civil Engineering

Environmental Engineering
Planning S
Landscape ArchilecGre WAKE FOREST, N.C.

NE/4 RALEIGH 15' QUADRANGLE

35078-H5-T5-024
224 Fayetteville St. Mall
Raleigh, NC 27602 Scale: I "=20001
[phone] Phone
[phone] Fax 1967
PHOTOREVISED 1987
DMA- 5255 1 NE-SERIES V842

w
7
U
w
z
J
r
X
W
I
rr
II
r /
r?
II
li
II
/I
r/
II
r
r
/
r!
i
\
I
I?
CO
co
Road Project 3
Commercial Collector Street
Crossing A
Scale 1" = 50'
?Iw If'u
N '
0? N
N? VN
i
II'
"QO
---------------
0

co
c
ci

Road Project 3

Commercial Collector Street
Crossing B
Scale 1" -- 50'
a
C,D
0
1
967
0
2 75
265
255
5p7
?4 0
0?z
260
?0?1o

s
0

0Pz
PACT=O.

Road Project 3
?9z Commercial Collector Street
Crossing C
Scale 1" = 50'

4OW
?fl
M OD
\\
0
XN
X
N
x
N
N v
UI
X
N
N
0
21 34500/ V
O
-U.UJI
x
fJ
N
N
N
u)

x
N
N
x
N
Road Project 3
Commercial Collector Street
750
Crossing D
1 Scale 1" -- 50'
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
&14
E3 FEHNF= I
January 15, 1997
Mr. James Spangler
Barrett Kays and Associates
224 Fayetteville Street Mall, Suite 100
P.O. Box 2979
Raleigh, NC 27602-2979
Dear Mr. Spangler:
Re: Application for 401 Water Quality Certification
Wakefield Development
Wake County
DWQ Project # 961148
On 20 December 1996 we received an application for wetland and stream fill for road
crossings for the Wakefield development. We understand from Mr. Ken Jolly of the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers that they have determined that this project is incomplete due to
the lack of information regarding the wetland impacts for golf course and residential lots.
DWQ has also determined that this application is incomplete due to lack of information
regarding a storm water plan for highly impervious areas (notably the commercial area and
shopping center) as well as any wetland impacts for this area, and residential subdivision
streets and any lot fill. These areas are listed in the "General Agenda: Pre-Permit
Application Meeting; December 19,1996" attended by Mr. Eric Galamb of my staff.
Finally if wetland or stream mitigation is required by DWQ or COE, this plan should be
developed as part of the application.
Until this additional information is provided this application is incomplete and our
processing "clock" will not start. We urge you to continue the pre-application process with
DWQ and the Corps to complete and refine the application in order to expedite its eventual
review. Mr. Eric Galamb of my staff will continue to be the contact for DWQ along with
Mr. Danny Smith of our Raleigh Regional Office. Please call me at 733-1786 if you have
any questions.
IS* ecerely,
J0. hn R. Dorney,
cc: Eric Galamb
Danny Smith, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Ken Jolly, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Central Files
Division of Water Quality • Environmental Sciences Branch
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
AT4
0?jj
C) FE F10
January 15, 1997
Mr. James Spangler
Barrett Kays and Associates
224 Fayetteville Street Mall, Suite 100
P.O. Box 2979
Raleigh, NC 27602-2979
Dear Mr. Spangler:
Re: Application for 401 Water Quality Certification
Wakefield Development
Wake County
DWQ Project # 961148
On 20 December 1996 we received an application for wetland and stream fill for road
crossings for the Wakefield development. We understand from Mr. Ken Jolly of the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers that they have determined that this project is incomplete due to
the lack of information regarding the wetland impacts for golf course and residential lots.
DWQ has also determined that this application is incomplete due to lack of information
regarding a storm water plan for highly impervious areas (notably the commercial area and
shopping center) as well as any wetland impacts for this area, and residential subdivision
streets and any lot fill. These areas are listed in the "General Agenda: Pre-Permit
Application Meeting; December 19, 1996" attended by Mr. Eric Galamb of my staff.
Finally if wetland or stream mitigation is required by DWQ or COE, this plan should be
developed as part of the application.
Until this additional information is provided this application is incomplete and our
processing "clock" will not start. We urge you to continue the pre-application process with
DWQ and the Corps to complete and refine the application in order to expedite its eventual
review. Mr. Eric Galamb of my staff will continue to be the contact for DWQ along with
Mr. Danny Smith of our Raleigh Regional Office. Please call me at 733-1786 if you have
any questions.
ISS' erely,
Jo ?n R. Dorney
cc ` tic Galan
Danny Smith, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Ken Jolly, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Central Files
Division of Water Quality • Environmental Sciences Branch
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper