20160978 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20191018

ID#* 20160978
Select Reviewer:*
Mac Haupt
Initial Review Completed Date 10/21/2019
Mitigation Project Submittal - 10/18/2019
Version* 2
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?*
Type of Mitigation Project:*
V Stream r Wetlands r Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Katie Webber
Project Information
..................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20160978
Existing IDY
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Polecat
County: Johnston
Document Information
r Yes r No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:*2
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Polecat MY2 Monitoring Report.pdf 15.52MB
Rease upload only one RDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Ryan Medric
Signature:*

0rols
October 18, 2019
Samantha Dailey
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
RE: Polecat Year 2 Monitoring Report (SAW — 2016-01986)
Ms. Dailey,
302 Jefferson St. Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South, Suite 300
Bellaire, TX 77401
Please find attached the Polecat Year 2 Monitoring Report. All 11 permanent and three fixed
vegetation plots met the 320 stems per acre success criteria. One small area of encroachment
was observed in the DWR portion of the easement upstream of KZ5. RES will communicate
with the farmer and install additional easement markers in this area to prevent further
encroachment.
RES is requesting a 10% credit release (656.70 SMUs).
Thank you,
6W-4�116�
Ryan Medric I Ecologist

POLECAT STREAM
MITIGATION SITE
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
YEAR 2 MONITORING REPORT
Neuse River Basin 030202011
Provided by:
fires
Bank Sponsor: EBX-Neuse I, LLC
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
919-829-9909
October 2019

Table of Contents
1.0 Project Summary ......................................
1.1 Project Location and Description
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives......
1.3 Project Success Criteria ..............
Stream Success Criteria ....................
Vegetation Success Criteria........................................................
1.4 Pro] ect Components.............................................................
1.5 Design/Approach..................................................................
1.6 Construction and As -Built Conditions .................................
1.7 Year 2 Monitoring Performance ...........................................
Vegetation...................................................................................
Stream Geomorphology..............................................................
StreamHydrology.......................................................................
2.0 Methods..............................................................................................
3.0 References..........................................................................................
Appendix A: Background Tables
Table 1: Project Mitigation Components
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3: Project Contacts Table
Table 4: Project Contacts Table
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View
Vegetation Plot Photos
Stream and Vegetation Problem Areas
Appendix C: Ve2etation Plot Data
Table 5: Planted Species Summary
Table 6: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 7a. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Table 7b. Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data
Appendix D: Stream Measurement and Geomorpholo2y Data
MY2 Cross -Section Plots
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 9. Cross Section Morphology Data Table
Table 10. Stream Reach Morphology Data Table
Appendix E: Hydrolou Data
Table 11. 2019 Rainfall Summary
Table 12. Documentation of Geomorphically Significant Flow Events
Crest Gauge Reading Photos

1.0 Proiect Summary
1.1 Project Location and Description
The Polecat Mitigation Site (the "Site") is located within a watershed dominated by agricultural land use in
Johnston County, North Carolina, approximately two miles southeast of Smithfield. The project streams
were significantly impacted by livestock access, row crop production, and nearby urbanization. The project
involves the restoration and protection of streams in the Neuse River watershed. The purpose of this Site is
to restore and enhance a stream complex located within the Neuse River Basin.
The Site lies within USGS Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03020201140010 (USGS, 2012). The 2010 Neuse
River Basin Restoration Plan (RBRP) identified the Neuse River watershed (HUC 03020201140010) as a
Targeted Local Watershed (TLW), a watershed that exhibits both the need and opportunity for wetland,
stream, and riparian buffer restoration. The Site supports many of the Neuse River RBRP and Neuse
Regional Watershed Plan (RWP) goals. The Project's watershed is primarily rural with Interstate 95
occupying the western portion of the watershed. The Project parcels have been in agricultural use for several
decades.
The Site is located within HUC 03020201 and includes streams that directly discharge into the Neuse River.
Many of the project design goals and objectives, including restoration of riparian buffers to filter runoff
from agricultural operations and improve terrestrial habitat, and construction of in -stream structures to
improve habitat diversity, will address the degraded water quality and nutrient input from farming that were
identified as major watershed stressors in the 2010 Neuse RBRP. Water quality stressors that affected the
Site included livestock access, row crop production, and impervious surface. The project presents 8,178
linear feet of stream restoration and enhancement generating 6,567 Stream Mitigation Units (SMU).
The areas adjacent to the Site consist of agricultural fields, cattle pastures and wooded areas. The total
easement area is 53.63 acres. Invasive species were present throughout the wooded areas and will continue
to be treated throughout the monitoring period. Channels restored were incised, both laterally and vertically
unstable, impacted by cattle, lack riparian buffers, and aquatic life was not supported. Stream conditions
along the restoration reaches exhibited habitat degradation because of impacts from livestock and nearby
impervious surfaces because of urbanization.
After completion of all construction and planting activities the Site will be monitored on a regular basis and
a physical inspection of the Site will be conducted at a minimum of twice per year throughout the seven-
year post -construction monitoring period, or until performance standards are met. These site inspections
will identify site components and features that require routine maintenance. The measure of stream
restoration success will be documented by bankfull flows and no change in stream channel classification.
Sand bed channels are dynamic and minor adjustments to dimension and profile are expected. The measure
of vegetative success for the Site is the survival of at least 210 seven-year old planted trees per acre with
an average height of 10 feet at the end of year seven of the monitoring period.
Upon approval for closeout by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the Site will be transferred to the North
Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation (NCWHF). The NCWHF will be responsible for periodic inspection
of the Site to ensure that restrictions required in the Conservation Easement or the deed restriction
document(s) are upheld. Endowment funds required to uphold easement and deed restrictions will be
negotiated prior to site transfer to the responsible party.
Polecat 2 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site October 2019

1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The 2010 Neuse River RBRP identified several restoration needs for the entire Neuse River Basin, as well
as for I UC 03020201. The Polecat Creek watershed (HUC 03020201140010) was identified as a TLW, a
watershed that exhibits both the need and opportunity for wetland, stream, and riparian buffer restoration.
The Polecat Creek watershed includes 42 square miles of watershed area. Twenty percent of the watershed
is used for agricultural purposes and three percent is currently developed.
The Site was identified as a stream and buffer restoration opportunity to improve water quality, habitat, and
hydrology within the Neuse River Basin. The Site is located within I UC 03020201 and includes streams
that directly discharge into the Neuse River. Many of the project design goals and objectives, including
restoration of riparian buffers to filter runoff from agricultural operations and improve terrestrial habitat,
and construction of in -stream structures to improve habitat diversity, will address the degraded water quality
and nutrient input from farming that were identified as major watershed stressors in the 2010 Neuse RBRP.
The project goals address stressors identified in the TLW and include the following:
• Nutrient removal,
• Sediment removal,
• Invasive species treatment,
• Filtration of runoff, and
• Improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat.
The project goals will be addressed through the following project objectives:
• Exclusion of livestock,
• Treatment of exotic invasive species,
• Restoration of forested riparian stream buffers,
• Stabilization of eroding stream banks due to lack of vegetation and livestock hoof shear,
• Addition of large woody debris, such as log vanes, log weirs, and root wads,
• Preservation and enhancement of hydrology in existing riparian wetlands, and
• Restoration of appropriate pattern, dimension, and profile in stream channels.
1.3 Project Success Criteria
The Site follows the USACE 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines and the "Wilmington District Stream and
Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update" dated October 24, 2016. Cross section and vegetation plot data
will be collected in Years 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Stream hydrology data and visual monitoring will be reported
annually.
Stream Success Criteria
Four bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The bankfull
events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until four bankfull
events have been documented in separate years.
Stream restoration reaches will be monitored to document intermittent or seasonal surface flow. This will
be accomplished through direct observation and the use of stream flow gauges with data loggers. Reaches
must demonstrate a minimum of 30 consecutive days of flow.
There should be little change in as -built cross -sections. If changes do take place, they should be evaluated
to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for example down -cutting or
Polecat 3 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site October 2019

erosion), or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling, vegetative
changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross -sections shall be classified
using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross -sections should fall within the
quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type. Bank height ratio shall not exceed
1.2, and the entrenchment ratio shall be no less than 1.4 within restored reaches. Channel stability should
be demonstrated through a minimum of four bankfull events documented in the seven-year monitoring
period.
Digital images will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion,
success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal images should
not indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in channel depth.
Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks over time. A
series of images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian vegetation.
Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the Site will follow
IRT Guidance. Vegetation monitoring plots will be a minimum of 0.02 acres in size, and cover a minimum
of two percent of the planted area. Vegetation monitoring will occur between July 1st and leaf drop and
includes II permanent vegetation plots and three random vegetation plots. The interim measures of
vegetative success for the site will be the survival of at least 320 planted three-year old trees per acre at
the end of Year 3, 260 five-year old trees at the end of Year 5, and the final vegetative success criteria
will be 210 trees per acre with an average height of 10 feet at the end of Year 7. Volunteer trees will be
counted, identified to species, and included in the yearly monitoring reports, but will not be counted
towards the success criteria of total planted stems.
1.4 Project Components
The project area is comprised of a single easement location along multiple drainage features that flow into
the Neuse River. The northern easement area captures two tributaries to Polecat Branch and a portion of its
headwaters. The southeastern easement area is separated from the northern area by a 100-foot crossing, and
is divided into three different areas due to a gas line easement and a telephone line easement. The stream
mitigation components are summarized in Table 1, as well as Figure 2.
Polecat 4 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site October 2019

Reach
Mitigation
Type
Stationing
(Proposed)
�
Existing
Length
(LF)
Proposed
Length
(LF)
Mitigation
Ratio
Base
SMUs
Adjusted
SMUs*
KZO**
Enhancement11
0+22
to
2+74
252
252
2.5:1
101
101
KZO
Enhancement II
3+05
to
3+94
89
89
2.5 : 1
36
36
KZ1 f
Enhancement III
0+35
to
5+20
485
485
5:1
97
97
KZl
Enhancement III
5+94
to
9+72
378
378
5:1
76
76
KZ2
P1 Restoration
9+72
to
15+93
575
621
1 : 1
621
699
KZ3
P2 Restoration
6+73
to
8+56
126
183
1: 1
183
183
KZ4TT
PI/P2 Restoration
15+93
to
27+38
1,028
1,145
1: 1
1,145
1,258
KZ4
Enhancement I
27+75
to
28+64
99
99
1.5 :1
66
66
KZ5
P2 Restoration
8+65
to
10+17
123
152
1: 1
152
152
KZ6
P2 Restoration
29+29
to
41+87
1,260
1,258
1: 1
1,258
1,306
MI1:
P1 Restoration
41+87
to
54+14
1,046
1,227
1: 1
1,227
1,227
MIl
P1 Restoration
55+15
to
64+67
878
952
1: 1
952
1,014
PCl
Enhancement III
0+95
to
7+00
605
605
5 : 1
121
131
PC2
Enhancement II
7+00
to
10+73
373
373
2.5 : 1
149
149
PC3
Enhancement III
11+35
to
14+94
359
359
5 : 1
72
72
Total
7,707
8,178
6,256
6,567
* SMUs are adjusted in accordance with Section XI(C)- `Procedures to Calculate Credits for Non-standard Buffer Widths",
published in the October 2016 Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update. A detailed description
of the methodology and calculations is included in Section 6 and Figure(s) 11.
** 30 foot break in easement/stream length for existing culvert crossing
T 74 foot break in easement/stream length for future Atlantic Coast Pipeline
TT 30 foot break in easement/stream length for existing overhead powerline
100 foot in easement/stream length for proposed farm crossing
1.5 Design✓Approach
The stream design approach for the Site was to combine the analog method of natural channel design with
analytical methods to evaluate stream flows and hydraulic performance of the channel and floodplain. The
analog method involves the use of a "template" stream adjacent to, nearby, or previously in the same
location as the design reach. The template parameters of the analog reach are replicated to create the features
of the design reach. The analog approach is useful when watershed and boundary conditions are similar
between the design and analog reaches (Skidmore et al., 2001). Hydraulic geometry was developed using
analytical methods to identify the design discharge.
The Site includes Restoration, Enhancement Level I, Enhancement Level II and Enhancement Level III.
Restoration was done along reaches MI1, KZ2, KZ3, KZ4, KZ5, and KZ6. Restoration reaches typically
include a meandering single -thread stream pattern constructed to mimic the natural planform of a low -
gradient, sand/gravel bed channel. Sinuosity depends on local reference reach conditions and hydrologic
and hydraulic modeling. As a result of the restoration of planform and dimension, periodic flooding and
Polecat 5 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site October 2019

restored riparian buffer provide the appropriate hydrology and sediment transport throughout this
watershed.
Enhancement Level I was done on Reach KZ4; Enhancement Level II and III was done along Reaches
KZ0, KZ1, PC1, PC2, and PC3. Enhancement Level I includes adjustments to the cross -sectional area of
the existing channel and floodplains, as well as installations of wood and rock structures to adjust and
enhance bedform. Enhancement Level II treatments include livestock exclusion and bank stabilization.
Enhancement Level III allows high quality aquatic habitat to be protected and enhanced through invasive
species treatments and supplemental plantings in the riparian buffer.
1.6 Construction and As -Built Conditions
Stream construction and planting was completed in May 2018. The Polecat Mitigation Site was built to
design plans and guidelines. No major changes or modifications were made during construction activities.
The fence and crossings were completed in June 2018. Baseline channel length and stationing is based on
design centerline.
1.7 Year 2 Monitoring Performance
The Polecat Year 2 Monitoring (MY2) activities were completed in September 2019. All Baseline
Monitoring data is present below and in the appendices. The Site is on track to meeting vegetation and
stream interim success criteria.
Vegetation
Monitoring of the 11 permanent vegetation plots and three random vegetation plots was completed during
September 2019. Vegetation data are in Appendix C, associated photos are in Appendix B, and plot
locations are in Appendix B. MY2 monitoring data indicates that all plots are exceeding the interim success
criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 445 to 1,133 planted stems per
acre with a mean of 846 planted stems per acre across the permanent plots. A total of 11 species were
documented within the plots. Volunteer species were observed in two plots. The average tree height
observed was 3.8 feet. Vegetation data from the three 100 square meter (25 meter x 4 meter) random belt
transects showed 648 stems per acre in Random Plot 1, 688 stems per acre in Random Plot 2, and 891 stems
per acre in Random Plot 3.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the project. One area of encroachment was observed along the edge
of the easement near the non jurisdictional ditch upstream of KZ5. This area is approximately 0.22 acres
and is completely in the DWR portion of the project. RES used logs as a physical barrier on the edge of the
easement, but these logs were moved as part of the encroachment. RES will communicate with the farmer
as well as move the logs back to the edge of the easement to prevent future encroachment. The area is
shown on Figure 2, labeled VPA1.
Stream Geomorphology
Geomorphology data for MY2 was collected during September 2019. Summary tables and cross
section/profile plots are in Appendix D. Overall the MY2 cross sections relatively match the as -built
conditions. Minor adjustments are expected during the first few years after construction. Bank height ratios
remain less than 1.2 and entrenchment ratios greater than 1.4.
Polecat 6 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site October 2019

Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability, such as eroding
banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. The channel is transporting sediment as designed
and will continue to be monitored for aggradation and degradation. The bank erosion area that was observed
and reported in MY did not worsen in MY2 and is stable, as vegetation continued to grow and strengthen
the bank.
Stream Hydrology
Flow and crest gauges are located on Reaches KZ2, KZ6, and MI1. There were 14 total bankfull events
recorded on site in MY2; two on KZ2, two on KZ6, and 10 on MI1. Gauge locations can be found on Figure
2 and data are in Appendix E.
2.6 Methods
Stream monitoring was conducted using a Topcon GTS-312 Total Station. Three-dimensional coordinates
associated with cross-section data was collected in the field (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS 3200).
Morphological data was collected at 22 cross -sections. Survey data was imported into CAD, ArcGIS®, and
Microsoft Excel® for data processing and analysis. In May 2018 three sets of crest gauges and flow gauges
were installed along the main project channel. The flow gauges were installed within the channel and will
record flow conditions at an hourly interval. The crest gauges were installed on the bank at the bankfull
elevation. During quarterly visits to the Site, the height of the corkline will be recorded. HOBO data from
the flow gauges will be corrected using bankfull recordings from the crest gauges. If there are no corkline
readings on the crest gauges, the height of the top of bank and water depth can be used to produce bankfull
readings from the HOBO data.
Vegetation success is being monitored at 11 permanent monitoring plots and three random monitoring plots.
Vegetation plot monitoring follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2
(Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of species composition and density of planted species. Data is
processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked
with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the
origin each monitoring year. The random plots are collected in the planted Non -Standard Buffer Width
areas as 100 square meter belt transects. To measure the belt transects, a meter tape is stretched diagonally
across the rows of trees and any tree that falls within width of the transect is recorded. The transects will
be mapped and new locations will be monitored in subsequent years.
Polecat 7 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site October 2019

3.0 References
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual,
Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Harman, W., R. Starr, M. Carter, K. Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, C. Miller. 2012. A Function -
Based Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects. US Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC EPA 843-K-12-006.
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). `Broad River Basin Restoration Priorities
2009." (September 2014).
Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998), A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274
Resource Environmental Solutions (2017). Mallard Water Quality Improvement Site Final Mitigation
Plan.
Rosgen, D. (1996), Applied River Morphology, 2nd edition, Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2003. April 2003 NC Stream Mitigation Guidelines.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W.
Lichvar, and C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-10-20. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and
Development Center.
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory
Mitigation Update.
Polecat 8 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site October 2019

Appendix A
Background Tables

Table 1. Polecat Stream Mitigation Site - Mitigation Assets and Components
Project
Component
(reach ID, etc.)'
Wetland
Position and
HydroType'
Existing
Footage
or
Acreage
Stationing
Mitigation
Plan
Footage or
Acreage
Restoration
Level
Approach
Priority
Level
Mitigation
Ratio (X:1)
Mitigation
Credits
Adjusted
Mitigation
Credits°
Notes/Comments
KZO
252
0+22 to 2+74
252
E II
-
2.5 : 1
101
101
Bank Stabilization, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation Easement
KZO
89
3+05 to 3+94
89
E II
-
2.5 : 1
36
36
Bank Stabilization, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation Easement
KZ1
485
0+35 to 5+20
485
E III
-
5 : 1
97
97
Invasive Species Treatment, Supplemental Buffer Plantings, Permanent Conservation Easement
KZ1
378
5+94 to 9+72
378
E III
-
5 : 1
76
76
Invasive Species Treatment, Supplemental Buffer Plantings, Permanent Conservation Easement
KZ2
575
9+72 to 15+93
621
R
P1
1 : 1
621
699
Full Channel Restoration, Channel Relocation, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent
Conservation Easement
KZ3
126
6+73 to 8+56
183
R
P2
1 : 1
183
183
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation Easement
KZ4
1,028
15+93 to 27+38
1,145
R
P1 / P2
1 : 1
1,145
1,258
Full Channel Restoration, Channel Relocation, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent
Conservation Easement
KZ4
99
27+75 to 28+64
99
E I
-
1.5 :1
66
66
Bank Modification, Installation of Structures, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation Easement
KZ5
123
8+65 to 10+17
152
R
P2
1 : 1
152
152
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation Easement
KZ6
1,260
29+29 to 41+87
1,258
R
P2
1 : 1
1,258
1,306
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation Easement
M11
1,046
41+87 to 54+14
1,227
R
P1
1 : 1
1,227
1,227
Full Channel Restoration, Channel Relocation, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent
Conservation Easement
M11
878
55+15 to 64+67
952
R
P1
1 : 1
952
1,014
Full Channel Restoration, Channel Relocation, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent
Conservation Easement
PC1
605
0+95 to 7+00
605
E III
-
5 : 1
121
131
Invasive Species Treatment, Supplemental Buffer Plantings, Permanent Conservation Easement
PC2
373
7+00 to 10+73
373
E II
-
2.5 : 1
149
149
Bank Stabilization, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation Easement
PC3
359
11+35 to 14+94
359
1 E III
I -
1 5: 1
72
72
Invasive Species Treatment, Supplemental Buffer Plantings, Permanent Conservation Easement
Length and Area Summations by Mitigation Category
Stream
Restoration Level (linear feet)
Riparian Wetland
(acres)
on -riparian
Wetland
(acres)
Riverine
Non-Riverine
Restoration 5,538
Enhancement
Enhancement 1 99
Enhancement 11 714
Enhancement III 1,827
Creation
Preservation
High Quality Pres
Overall Assets Summary
Overall
Asset Category
Credits
Stream
RNR Wetland
NR Wetland
General Note -The above componenttable is intended to be a close complementto the asset map. Each
entry in the above table should have clear distinction and appropriate symbology in the asset map.
1- Wetiand Groups represent pooled wetland polygons in the map with the same wetland type and
restoration level. If some ofthe wetland polygons within a group are in meaningfully different
landscape positions, soil types or have different community targets (as examples), then further
segmentation in the table may be warranted. Wetland features impacted by credit modifiers such as
utilities shall be listed as a distinct record with the impacted acreage tallied as discreet records in the
table (See Wetland 7 above)
2- Wetiand Position and Hydro Type- Indicates Riparian Riverine,(RR), riparinan non-riverine(RNR) or
Non-Riverine (NR)
3- Buffer Assets -due to the complex nature of buffer and nutrient offset assets they are not included
in this example table. Please see the DMS buffer mitigation plan template for the required asset table
information.
4 -Adjusted Mitigation Credits are based on the non-standard buffer widths.

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Polecat Stream Mitigation Site
Elapsed Time Since grading complete: 1 year 5 months
Elapsed Time Since planting complete: 1 year 5 months
Number of reporting Years : 2
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
NA
Jul-17
Final Design — Construction Plans
NA
Jan-18
Stream Construction
NA
May-18
Containerized, bare root and B&B plantings for reach/segments 1 &2
NA
May-18
As -built (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline)
Jul-18
Jul-18
Year 1 Monitoring
Dec-18
Jan-19
Year 2 Monitoring
Sep-19
Oct-19
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Year 6 Monitoring
Year 7 Monitoring
= The number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Selma Mill Stream Mitigation Site
Designer
WK Dickson and Co., Inc. / 720 Corporate Center Dr., Raleigh,
NC 27607
Primary project design POC
Frasier Mullen [phone]
Construction Contractor
KBS Earthwork Inc. / 5616 Coble Church Rd., Julian, NC
27283
Construction contractor POC
[phone]
Survey Contractor
Matrix East, PLLC / 906 N. Queen St., Suite A, Kinston, NC
28501
Survey contractor POC
James R. Watson, PLS / [phone]
Planting Contractor
H&J Forestry
Planting contractor POC
Matt Hitch
Seeding Contractor
KBS Earthwork Inc. / 5616 Coble Church Rd., Julian, NC
27283
Contractor point of contact
[phone]
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource [phone]
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Arborgen [phone]
Monitoring Performers
RES / 302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110, Raleigh, NC 27605
Stream Monitoring POC
Ryan Medric [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Ryan Medric [phone]
Wetland Monitoring POC
N/A

Table 4. Project Background Information
Project Name
Polecat
County
Johnston
Project Area (acres)
53.63
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
Latitude: 35.4754 N Longitude:-78.3117 W
Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody Stems Planted)
17.72
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Coastal Plain
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
03020201140010
DWR Sub -basin
03-04-02
Project Drainage Area (Acres and Square Miles)
3,059
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<2%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Agriculture, Forest
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
0
IQ1
IQ2
IQ3
0
I0
IQ6
MI1
PC1
PC2
PC3
Length of reach (linear feet)
341
863
621
183
1244
152
1258
2179
605
373
359
Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined, unconfined)
C
UC
w
C
C
C
w
C
NIA
UC
UC
Drainage area (Acres and Square Miles)
217
524
533
88
735
88
787
825
NIA
3046
3059
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
I
I
I
P
I
P
P
P
P
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
WA
C;NSW
C;NSW
dC;NSA
Stream Classification (existing)
5
E4
CS
C4/G4c
CS
CS
E4/5
NIA
5
Stream Classification (proposed)
ON11A
5
E4
5
E4
5
5
E4
NIA
5
E5
Evolutionary trend (Simon)
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
WA
WA
WA
WA
FEMA classification
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
WA
AE
AE
AE
Regulatory Considerations
Parameters
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting
Docs?
Water of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
SAW-2016-
01986
Water of the United States - Section 401
Yes
Yes
DWR # 16-
0978v2
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
USFWS
(Corr. Letter)
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
SHPO (Corr.
Letter)
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA or CAMA)
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
Yes
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A

Legend
Conservation Easement
I►j
----- BcffpHWn Rd_
a
1'
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCRE,N ENT P, NRCan, Esri
9 Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esii (Thailand), NGCC
z OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
N
Date: 7/17/201 S
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
w e Drawn by: D rLms
Polecat Stream Mitigation Site
s Checked by:: DPI
o soo 1,000
Johnston County, North Carolina
1 inch = 1,000 feet

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

Prolwsed Reach
Mitigation Type
Proposed Length(LIF)
Mitigation Ratio
BaseSMUs
AdjustedSMLTs
KZl
KLl
Enhancement lII
Enhancement III
485
378
1:5.0
1 : 5.0
97
76
97
76
KZ2
PI Restomtion
621
1 : 1.0
621
699
KZ4
Pl/ P2 Restomtion
1,145
1 : 1.0
1,145
1,258
KZ4
EnhancementI
99
1:1.5
66
66
KZ6
P2 Restoration
1258
1:1.0
1,258
1,306
MB
PI Restoration
1227
1 : 1.0
1,227
1,227
MB
KZ3
KZ5
PI Restoration
P2 Restomtion
P2 Restomtion
952
183
152
1 : 1.0
1:1.0
1:1.0
952
183
152
1,014
183
152
PCl
Enhancement III
605
1 : 5.0
121
131
PC2
Enhancement II
373
1:2.5
149
149
PC3
Enhancement III
359
1 : 5.0
72
?2
KZO
Enhancement II
252
1:2.5
101
101
KZO
Enhancement II
89
1:2.5
36
36
Total
1 8,178 1
6,256
6,567
�-
k � res
<r.
o
W E
J :
i
sP R
S
' 0 250 500
..,.. � : '� �` :. .,,.. _ ,.-•"; •_,�� ' - ...� Feet
,� �� `�, Figure 2
1 L @ N' llfy.4A
Current Conditions Overview
' ait MY2 2019
Nr
Polecat Stream
Restoration Site
K•Z6 -
P2 Restoration
KZ 1 Johnston County, NC
KZO Date: 10/15/2019 Drawn by: MDD
I KZ4"
P2 Resioratlon 3 1 Lat:35.4754 Long:-78.3117
LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
;: ,fi 0 VP >320 stems/acre
Random Vegetation Plot
Existing Wetland
X
Restoration
Enhancement
P2 Restoration 'mot Enhancement 11
3 — Enhancement Ill
.KZ4 R2,Restoration Top of Bank
P1/P2 Restoration Cross Section
- - ® Flow/Crest Gauge
r
• Rain Gauge
REFERENCE
I 1.)Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017.
2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N.
3.) The parcel data information/property
boundaries depicted on this map is for
prospect assessment purposes only.
It is not to be used as final boundaries.
x-
N C to f G,�,o h Inf rm

f
�„ Y.
q1' to
f4,'r •,.i l T a �. '
.A x
- ,� � - � _ sic- 4�'�,�,�IrR:�„�� `� �' --'^�•
1 IL
Ait
.�F M l='� ` �� r� ;� A�� � + a -Y — f+'•
t
il
KZ1 '-
0
4 �4
9�
O
F
k.
.1►
_W
54�IL
- t
fires
Is, �
0 50 100
Feet
Figure 2
(Page 1)
Current Conditions
Plan View - MY2 2019
f' Polecat Stream
Mitigation Site
Johnston County, NC
Date: 10/15/2019 Drawn by: RTM
Lat: 35.4754 Long:-78.3117
LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
VP >320 stems/acre
o Random Vegetation Plot
® Existing Wetland
Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
Enhancement Ill
Top of Bank
s Cross Section
ED Flow/Crest Gauge
40 Rain Gauge
Vegetation Condition Assessment
Target Community
Present Marginal Absent
Q Absent F-Fill
rn
v
N
Present t XXX
c
REFERENCE
1.) Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017.
2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N.
3.) The parcel data information/property
boundaries depicted on this map is for
prospect assessment purposes only.
It is not to be used as final boundaries.

61
fires
IV
W
4
"N
0 50 100
21 Feet
Figure 2
(Page 2)
Current Conditions
Plan View - MY2 2019
Polecat Stream
. . . . . . . . . Mitigation Site
KZ1 Johnston County, NC
Date 10/15/2019 Drawn by: RTM
Lat 35.4754 Long: -78.3117
*L 60 171� LEGEND
C3 Conservation Easement
=1 VP >320 stems/acre
Random Vegetation Plot
A
'4 rZ] Existing Wetland
3 Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
AW Enhancement III
Top of Bank
Cross Section
ED Flow/Crest Gauge
Rain Gauge
4L Vegetation Condition Assessment
....... ....... ---- W Target Community
W Present Mar final Absent
U
Absent No Fill
W Present
REFERENCE
1 Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017.
Wk 2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N.
3.) The parcel data information/property
boundaries depicted on this map is for
prospect assessment purposes only.
It is not to be used as final boundaries.

N
0&
.t
6
fires
F
0 50 100
Feet
Figure 2
(Page 3)
Current Conditions
Plan View - MY2 2019
Polecat Stream
Mitigation Site
Johnston County, NC
Date: 10/15/2019 Drawn by: RTM
Lat: 35.4754 Long:-78.3117
LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
® VP >320 stems/acre
o Random Vegetation Plot
® Existing Wetland
— Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
— Enhancement III
Top of Bank
Cross Section
® Flow/Crest Gauge
Rain Gauge
Vegetation Condition Assessment
H Target Community
T Present Marginal Absent
U
Q Absent No Fill
fn
v
.N
Present
f6
C
REFERENCE
1.) Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017
2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N
3.) The parcel data information/property
boundaries depicted on this map is for
prospect assessment purposes only.
It is not to be used as final boundaries.
0&
.t
6
fires
F
0 50 100
Feet
Figure 2
(Page 3)
Current Conditions
Plan View - MY2 2019
Polecat Stream
Mitigation Site
Johnston County, NC
Date: 10/15/2019 Drawn by: RTM
Lat: 35.4754 Long:-78.3117
LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
® VP >320 stems/acre
o Random Vegetation Plot
® Existing Wetland
— Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
— Enhancement III
Top of Bank
Cross Section
® Flow/Crest Gauge
Rain Gauge
Vegetation Condition Assessment
H Target Community
T Present Marginal Absent
U
Q Absent No Fill
fn
v
.N
Present
f6
C
REFERENCE
1.) Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017
2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N
3.) The parcel data information/property
boundaries depicted on this map is for
prospect assessment purposes only.
It is not to be used as final boundaries.

0
Ee
0
2
•
fires
0 50 100
Feet
Figure 2
(Page 4)
❑ Current Conditions
Plan View - MY2 2019
Polecat Stream
Mitigation Site
Johnston County, NC
Date: 10/15/2019 Drawn by: RTM
Long: . . . . . .
3117
LEGEND
C3 Conservation Easement
EM VP >320 stems/acre
o Random Vegetation Plot
rZ] Existing Wetland
Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
Enhancement III
Top of Bank
Cross Section
ED �Iow/Crest Gauge
Rain Gauge
Vegetation Condition Assessment
U) Target Community
.W Present Marginal Absent
U
wo. Absent
Present
> EM
REFERENCE
1.) Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017.
2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 LITM Z17N.
3.) The parcel data information/property
boundaries depicted on this map is for
prospect assessment purposes only.
It is not to be used as final boundaries.

i f
w ,
Y7. -
_.. N
- E
�� r�J s� - • ores
r
•'� S
ti4
0 50 100
! Feet
Figure 2
(Page 5)
yl
a W
., Current Conditions
Plan View - MY2 2019
r
Polecat Stream
-A AI Mitigation Site
Johnston County, NC
k �� Date: 10/15/2019 Drawn by: RTM
1
� Long:-78.3117
_ � rr LEGEND
{,� �~"� � r✓•^-- - �..�-.�_-_.__�_ �, ,.,� t�,�~1 KZs fly- _ OConservation Easement
6 ® VP >320 stems/acre
Random Vegetation Plot
M�1�.„ �� ® Existing Wetland
, 7 `~" — Restoration
Enhancement I
k Enhancement 11
Enhancement III
k Top of Bank
"^ t Cross Section
4k r, wv�
(D low/Crest Gauge
Rain Gauge
'< Vegetation Condition Assessment
w Target Community
w Present Mar inal Absent
fi U
Absent No Fill
Present
REFERENCE
? 1.) Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017.
- 2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N.
3.) The parcel data information/property
s boundaries depicted on this map is for
prospect assessment purposes only.
It is not to be used as final boundaries.
• N Cente fo Geo ph' Inf rm � n & A I i

1�
ZZ
yrl✓��A/
00.
i
;:•rs .
fires
� E
VV S
lJ ytf d _ 0 50 100
Feet
x
X E
Figure 2
(Page 6)
' Current Conditions
J-
Plan View - MY2 2019
Polecat Stream
Mitigation Site
'vl�y r Johnston County, NC
Date: 10/15/2019 Drawn by: RTM
Lat: 35.4754 Long:-78.3117
LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
VP >320 stems/acre
o Random Vegetation Plot
- $ ® Existing Wetland
Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
— Enhancement III
Top of Bank
Cross Section
® Flow/Crest Gauge
Rain Gauge
Vegetation Condition Assessment
w Target Community
w Present Marginal Absent
U
Q Absent =OF
rn
v
.N
Present
>
C
REFERENCE
1.) Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017.
2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N.
3.) The parcel data information/property
boundaries depicted on this map is for
prospect assessment purposes only.
It is not to be used as final boundaries.

I�
s
r
U
!.
e
fires
CO+-
m
0 50 100
Feet
Figure 2
(Page 7)
Current Conditions
Plan View - MY2 2019
Polecat Stream
Mitigation Site
Johnston County, NC
Date: 10/15/2019 Drawn by: RTM
Lat: 35.4754 Long:-78.3117
LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
0 /P >320 stems/acre
o Random Vegetation Plot
® Existing Wetland
— Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
— Enhancement III
Top of Bank
Cross Section
® rlow/Crest Gauge
Rain Gauge
Vegetation Condition Assessment
H Target Community
.v Present Marginal Absent
U
Q Absent No Fill
v
N
Present
c
REFERENCE
1.) Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017
2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N
3.) The parcel data information/property
boundaries depicted on this map is for
prospect assessment purposes only.
It is not to be used as final boundaries.

Polecat MY2 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1
Vegetation Plot 3
Vegetation Plot 5
Vegetation Plot 2
Vegetation Plot 4
Vegetation Plot 6

Vegetation Plot 7
Vegetation Plot 9
Vegetation Plot 11
Vegetation Plot 8
Vegetation Plot 10

Stream Problem Areas
Selma Mill
Label / Feature Issue / Location / Size
Photo
N/A
N/A
Vegetation Problem Areas
Selma Mill
I Label / Feature CategOry / Location / Size I Photo I
VPAI/ Encroachment / DWR Area / 0.22 ac.

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 5. Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Scientific Name
Total Stems Planted
Green Ash
Froxinus pennsylvonico
2400
Sycamore
Plotonus occidentolis
2400
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
2400
Blackgum
Nysso sylvotico
2400
River Birch
Betulo nigro
2400
Baldcypress
Toxodium distichum
2400
Water Oak
Quercus nigro
2000
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus michouxii
2000
Overcup Oak
Quercus lyrata
2000
Total
20,400
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Stem
Height (ft)
1
809
0
809
Yes
5.4
2
850
0
850
Yes
3.5
3
890
0
890
Yes
3.0
4
890
0
890
Yes
4.6
5
769
0
769
Yes
4.2
6
971
40
1012
Yes
3.3
7
931
0
931
Yes
3.2
8
1133
0
1133
Yes
3.0
9
445
0
445
Yes
3.1
10
728
40
769
Yes
4.7
11
890
0
890
Yes
4.0
Project
Avg
846
7
854
Yes
3.8

Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 7a. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Polecat
Current Plot Data PMAY2 2019
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species T efPn.L1P-"1l
0210--0001
0210-01-0002
0210-01-0003
0210-01-0OU4
0210-01-00D6
0210-01-0006
0210-01-0007
2
2
T
2
PnoLS
1 _
P-all
I 1
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
2
T
2
PnoLS
P-all
1
T
1 3
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
LI-
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
3
4
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon
Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
8
8
8
5
5
5
14
14
14
_J
I
_3
_
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
7
7
7
_
_
1
1
1
_
j
J
J
_
_
_
J
J
J
Quercus
oak
Tree
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
3
3
3
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
J
J
3
7
2
L
L
J
J
J
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
_
_
_
9
9
9
2
J
J
2
2
L
C
J
5
5
4
Taxodium distichum bald cypress
Tree
_4
_4
_Z-
8
8
8
1
11
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems erACRE
20
20
2C
21
21
21
22
22
22
22
22
22
_ 9
_ 9
_ 9
24
24
25
23
23
23
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
5
5
5
61
61
6
61
61
6
51
5
5
5
5
3
5
5
6
5
5
5
W9.4
809.4
809.4
949.8
849.8
849.8
990.3
890.3
590.3
990.3
890.3
890.3
769.91
769.91
768.9
971.2
971.2
1012
930.91
930.81
930.8
Polecat
Current Plot Data MY2 2019
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
0210-01-0009
0210-01-0009
0210-01-0010
0210-01-0011
MY2 (2019)
MY1(2019)
MY0 (2019)
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
6
6
6
1
_
1
-
-
-
27
27
27
27
27
27
30
30
30
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon
Tree
4
4
-
4
4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
'1
1
_
41
_
42
=3
=3
=3
48
48
48
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
450
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
2
f
J
J
J
13
LJ
13
_3
_3
1-81
27
27
27
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
_
_
_
5
5
6
-
-
4
26
26
27
26
26
26
31
311
31
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
15
15
15
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
5
5
.51
26
26
26
25
25
25
4
4
4
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
10
10
10
2
2
2
25
25
25
24
24
24
28
28
28
Quercus nigra
Iwater oak
Tree
11
1
11
4
4
4
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
6
6
6
-
-
4
4
4
4
42
42
=2
52
52
52
66
66
66
Taxodium distichum bald cypress
Tree
2
21
2
2
2
2
25
25
23
26
26
26
32
32
32
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems erACRE
28
28
28
17
171
11
18
1S
19
22
22
22
2-30
2-30
232
2=7
247
697
295
295
295
i
1
1
1
11
1i
11
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.27
0.27
0.27
8
8
8
5
5
5
5
5
5
7
7
7
10
10
10
10
10
11
10
10
10
1133
1133
1133
445.2
445.2
445.2
728.4
725.4
768.9
890.3
990.3
990.3
846.2
946.2
953.5
908.7
909.7
2564
1049
1049
1M

Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 7b. Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data
Random Plot 1
#
Species
Height (cm)
1
Quercus phellos
58
2
Quercus phellos
60
3
Nysso sylvotico
62
4
Quercus lyroto
59
5
Plotonus occidentolis
152
6
Plotonus occidentolis
205
7
Quercus lyroto
81
8
Quercus phellos
75
9
Quercus phellos
57
10
Toxodium distichum
140
11
Toxodium distichum
60
12
Toxodium distichum
170
13
Plotonus occidentolis
92
14
Plotonus occidentolis
129
15
Plotonus occidentolis
141
16
Quercus phellos
65
Stems/Acre
648
Average Height (cm)
100
Average Height (ft)
3.3
Plot Size (m)
25x4
Random Plot 2
#
Species
Height
(cm)
1
Froxinus pennsylvonico
59
2
Froxinus pennsylvonico
53
3
Quercus phellos
60
4
Quercus phellos
63
5
Quercus phellos
42
6
Toxodium distichum
52
7
Toxodium distichum
90
8
Froxinus pennsylvonico
63
9
Froxinus pennsylvonico
50
10
Froxinus pennsylvonico
50
11
Quercus michouxii
63
12
Plotonus occidentolis
79
13
Froxinus pennsylvonico
58
14
Quercus phellos
50
15
Froxinus pennsylvonico
60
16
Plotonus occidentolis
40
17
Froxinus pennsylvonico
50
Stems/Acre
688
Average Height (cm)
58
Average Height (ft)
1.9
Plot Size (m)
25x4
Random Plot 3
#
Species
Height (cm)
1
Plotonus occidentolis
99
2
Plotonus occidentolis
109
3
Plotonus occidentolis
68
4
Betulo nigro
88
5
Plotonus occidentolis
102
6
Plotonus occidentolis
97
7
Plotonus occidentolis
150
8
Betulo nigro
210
9
Betulo nigro
215
10
Betulo nigro
135
11
Betulo nigro
124
12
Betulo nigro
125
13
Betulo nigro
172
14
Quercus phellos
191
15
Plotonus occidentolis
195
16
Quercus lyroto
59
17
Betulo nigro
150
18
Betulo nigro
181
19
Betulo nigro
230
20
Betulo nigro
161
21
Plotonus occidentolis
73
22
Toxodium distichum
148
Stems/Acre
891
Average Height (cm)
140
Average Height (ft)
4.6
Plot Size (m)
25x4

Appendix D
Stream Measurement and
Geomorphology Data

•.��.�,�
��" ..�},-��;. -�;7r�
.fl `fir.-�' p 'T 1
r
• ^.l ,,�p �+'
•ram' .i "r� -�
•'!4s_•' • .fit
r
Upstream
Downstream
Polecat - Reach KZ2 - Cross Section 1 - Pool
142
141
140
°
w
13970'
138
137
136
0 3 6 9 12 15
18 21
24 27
Distance (ft)
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
MYO-2018 - MY1-2018
MY2 —
— -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 1 (Pool)
Based
on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record e evahon ( atum) use
138.9
139.0
139.0
Bankfull Width ft
11.9
14.0
14.1
Floodprone Width ft
50.1
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
1.2
1.2
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.4
2.6
2.6
Low Bank Height ft
2.4
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
16.3
16.3
16.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.8
12.1
12.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Polecat - Reach KZ2 - Cross Section 2 - Shallow
143
142
141
° 140
w 139
138
137
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 MY1-2018 MY2-2019 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 2 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
138.9
139.0
139.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.4
13.7
15.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
49.5
>49.7
>49.7
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.2
1.1
1.0
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.6
1.7
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.6
1.7
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area fe
15.0
15.0
15.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.2
12.5
15.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.0
>3.6
>3.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Polecat - Reach KZ2 - Cross Section 3 - Shallow
141
140
139
° 138
°
w
_ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _
137
136
135
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018—MY1-2018 MY2-2019 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 3 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
137.0
137.0
137.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.7
11.1
13.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
49.9
>49.8
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
1.0
0.9
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.5
1.6
1.6
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.5
1.6
1.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
11.8
11.5
11.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.5
10.7
15.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.3
>4.5
>3.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1 1.0
1.0
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
141
Polecat - Reach KZ3 - Cross Section 4 - Run
140
139
° 138
°
w
137
136
135
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
_ _
0 3 6 9 12 15
MYO-2018—MY1-2018
18 21
24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MY2-2019 — — -Approx. Bankfull FloodproneArea
Cross Section 4 (Run)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
136.2
136.3
136.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.8
6.7
6.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
49.9
>50.2
>50.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
0.7
0.6
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.0
1.1
1.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.0
1.2
1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
4.4
4.4
4.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.6
10.2
10.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
7.3
>7.5
>7.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1.1
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Polecat - Reach KZ4 - Cross Section 5 - Shallow
139
138
137
0 136
w
135
134
133
15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60 63
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 — MY1-2018 MY2-2019 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 5 (Shallow)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
135.5
135.7
135.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.3
18.7
13.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
74.2
>74.5
>74.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
0.9
1.3
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.9
1.9
1 2.0
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.9
1.6
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fi)
17.0
17.0
17.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
15.6
20.6
10.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.5
>4.0
>5.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
0.8
0.8

Upstream
Downstream
138
Polecat - Reach KZ4 - Cross Section 6 - Pool
137
136
°
°
w
135
134
133
132
15
18 21 24 27 30
MYO-2018
33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60 63
Distance (ft)
—MY1-2018 MY2-2019 — — -Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 6 (Pool)
'Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
135.2
135.3
135.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.4
15.1
13.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
72.2
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.5
1.3
1.4
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
2.5
2.5
2.5
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.0
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
19.6
19.6
19.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.2
11.7
9.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
I N/A
I N/A
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
138
Polecat - Reach KZ5 - Cross Section 7 - Shallow
137
136
°
w
135
134
_
_ _
_ _ _ _
133
132
0 3 6 9 12 15
MYO-2018—MY1-2018
18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MY2-2019 — — -Approx. Bankfull FloodproneArea
Cross Section 7 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
134.1
134.1
134.2
Bankfu11 Width (ft)
6.5
7.5
8.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
49.8
>49.9
>49.9
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
0.5
0.4
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.0
1.1
1.0
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.0
1.0
0.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
3.8
3.8
3.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.1
14.7
19.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
7.7
>6.7
>5.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
0.9
0.9

Upstream
Downstream
136
Polecat - Reach KZ4 - Cross Section 8- Pool
135
134
°
°
w
133
132
131
130
25 28 31 34 37 40
MYO-2018—MYl-2018
43 46
49 52 55 58 61 64 67 70 73
Distance (ft)
MY2-2019 — — -Approx. Bankfull FloodproneArea
Cross Section 8(Po ol
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
133.3
133.4
133.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.1
12.8
14.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
72.4
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
1.3
1.2
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
2.1
2.3
2.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.1
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (It)
16.7
16.7
16.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.4
9.8
11.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Polecat - Reach KZ4 - Cross Section 9 - Shallow
137
136
135
°
134
w
133
132
131
25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64 67 70 73
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 MYl-2018 MY2-2019 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 9 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
133.4
133.4
133.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.3
13.2
13.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
76.4
>76.7
>76.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
1.2
1.2
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.7
1.8
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.7
1.8
1.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
15.6
15.6
15.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.3
11.2
11.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
5.8
>5.8
>5.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Polecat - Reach KZ4 (EI) - Cross Section 10 - Shallow
136
135
134
°
133
a)
w
132
131
130.7
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 MYl-2018 MY2-2019 - - -Approx. Bankfull FloodproneArea
Cross Section 10 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
132.6
132.6
132.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.5
8.9
8.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
27.8
>28.7
>28.7
Bankfull Mean Depth (it)
1.2
1.1
1.1
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.7
2.1
2.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.7
2.3
2.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area fe
10.0
10.0
10.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.3
7.9
7.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
3.3
>3.2
>3.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.1
1.1

Upstream
Downstream
136
Polecat - Reach KZ6 - Cross Section 11 - Shallow
135
134
°
133
w
132
131
_______
_
_
_
_
130
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21
MYO-2018—MY1-2018
24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MY2-2019 — — -Approx. Bankfull FloodproneArea
Cross Section 11 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
131.7
131.9
131.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.1
14.8
15.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
48.6
>49.9
>50.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
1.0
1.0
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.7
1.8
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.7
1.7
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
15.1
15.1
15.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.3
14.5
15.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
1 3.7
>3.4
>3.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1.0
0.9

Upstream
Downstream
Polecat - Reach KZ6 - Cross Section 12 - Pool
134
133
132
° 131
w 130
129
128
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 MY1-2018 MY2-2019 — — •Approx. BankfuII
Cross Section 12(Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
130.8
130.8
130.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.7
11.4
11.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
45.0
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
1.2
1.2
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.9
2.1
2.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.9
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
13.7
13.7
13.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.3
9.4
9.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Polecat - Reach KZ6 - Cross Section 13 - Shallow
135
134
133
°
132
w
131
130
129
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 MYl-2018 MY2-2019 — — -Approx. Bankfull ——FloodproneArea
Cross Section 13 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
131.1
131.1
131.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.5
12.8
12.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.3
>50.1
>50.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
1.2
1.2
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.9
1.9
1.9
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.9
2.1
2.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 06
14.7
14.7
14.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.6
11.1
11.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.0
>3.9
>3.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.1
1.1

Upstream
Downstream
Polecat - Reach KZ6 - Cross Section 14 - Pool
132
131
130
°
129
w
128
127
126
0 3 6 9 12 15
18 21
24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018
MY1-2018
MY2-2019 — — •Approx. BankfU
Cross Section 14(Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
129.6
129.7
129.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.0
22.3
15.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.1
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.9
1.2
1.7
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
2.8
2.8
2.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.8
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
26.3
26.3
26.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.5
19.0
9.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
I N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Polecat - Reach KZ6 - Cross Section 15 - Shallow
133
132
131
° 130
w
129
128
127
�
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 MYl-2018 MY2-2019 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 15 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
129.3
129.3
129.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.0
13.6
13.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.1
>50.0
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
1.3
1.3
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
2.0
1.9
2.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.0
2.0
2.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (116
18.1
18.1
18.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.8
10.3
10.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
3.6
>3.7
>3.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Polecat - Reach Mil - Cross Section 16 - Shallow
132
131
130
° 129
m
w 128
127
126
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 — MYl-2018 MY2-2019 — — -Approx. Bankfull FloodproneArea
Cross Section 16 Shallow
Based on fixed basjLne bankfiill elevation M
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
128.9
128.9
128.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.1
14.0
14.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
>49.9
>49.9
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
1.4
1.4
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
2.1
2.1
2.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.1
2.1
2.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 06
19.9
19.9
19.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.0
9.9
10.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
3.5
>3.6
>3.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Polecat - Reach M11 - Cross Section 17 - Pool
131
130
129
0
° 128
°
w 127
126
125
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 MYl-2018 MY2-2019 — — -Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 17(Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
128.8
128.8
128.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.3
14.9
13.8
Floodprone Width (it)
50.0
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.7
1.6
1.8
Bankfull MaxDepth (it)
2.6
3.1
1 3.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.6
N/A
N/A
Bankfiill Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
24.5
24.5
24.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.3
9.0
7.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
I N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Polecat - Reach M11 - Cross Section 18 - Pool
129
128
127
° 126
7
°
w
125
124
123
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 MY1-2018 MY2-2019 — — -Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 18 Pool
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
126.3
126.7
126.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.7
25.4
17.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
51.7
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
4.1
0.7
1.1
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
2.6
2.3
1 2.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.6
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 06
19.0
19.0
19.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.5
34.0
15.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
I N/A
N/A
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Polecat - Reach M11 - Cross Section 19 - Shallow
130
129
128
° 127
6
w 126
mmollill
125
124
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 MYl-2018 MY2-2019 — — -Approx. Bankfull FloodproneArea
Cross Section 19 (Shallow)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
126.4
126.3
126.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.8
14.7
14.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.1
>50.0
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.2
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.7
1.8
2.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.7
1.7
2.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
16.6
16.6
16.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.3
13.0
12.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
3.4
>3.4
>3.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0

Upstream
2 -
' - r"�{ . ��. ,'� •fit Y y .�'w. it
Downstream
Polecat - Reach M11 - Cross Section 20 - Pool
129
128
127
° 126
w 125
124
123
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 MY1-2018 MY2-2019 — — -Approx. BankfUll
Cross Section 20(Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
125.5
125.7
125.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.7
14.8
14.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.6
1.4
1.4
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
2.5
2.5
2.5
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.5
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
20.5
20.5
20.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.9
10.7
9.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Polecat - Reach Mil - Cross Section 21 - Shallow
129
128
127
°
126
w
_
_ _
_
_
_ _
_ _
125
124
123
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 MY1-2018 MY2-2019 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 21 1
Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
125.3
125.4
125.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.9
14.5
13.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
49.9
>50.0
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.0
1.1
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.7
1.9
2.0
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.7
1.8
2.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
14.2
14.2
14.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.8
14.7
12.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
3.9
>3.5
>3.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
0.9
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
128
Polecat - Reach Mil (Reconnected Channel) - Cross Section 22 - Run
127
126
°
ID
w
125
124
123
122
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21
MYO-2018 MY1-2018
24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MY2-2019 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 22 Run
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
124.9
124.9
124.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.6
11.3
11.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
32.9
>30.4
>31.5
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.4
0.4
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
0.8
0.7
0.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
0.8
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
4.7
4.7
4.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
28.6
27.5
27.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.8
>2.7
>2.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.2
1.0

Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Polecat Mitigation Site - Reaches KZ2, KZ4, KZ6, M11: 5,203 feet
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition*
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
---
---
8.1
11.3
11.9
13.6
2.0
6
---
---
12.2
---
---
---
7.0
13.2
14.0
11.6
13.3
13.1
16.3
1.4
11
Floodprone Width (ft)
16.0
24.0
24.0
30.0
5.5
6
---
---
>50
---
---
---
27.0
30.0
31.0
>32.9
>52.9
>50
>76.4
12.2
11
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
---
---
---
1.0
1.4
1.4
1.7
0.3
6
---
---
1.0
---
---
---
1.1
1.3
1.4
0.4
1.1
1.2
1.4
0.3
11
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.4
1.9
2.0
2.4
0.4
6
---
---
2.3
---
---
---
1.4
1.6
1.8
0.8
1.7
1.7
2.1
0.3
11
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
--
--
--
12.0
14.8
115.1
1 18.2
1 2.5
1 6
12.2
13.2
16.6
19.3
4.7
114.8
115.1
19.9
4.0
11
Width/Depth Ratio
4.7
8.9
9.9
11.8
3.1
6
12.1
10.2
10.5
10.9
10.0
13.2
11.3
28.6
5.4
11
EntrenchmenE tio
1.2
2.2
2.1
3.1
0.7
6
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.8
>4.0
>3.9
>5.8
0.8
11
'Bank Hei hti
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 0.0
11
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
4
---
7.5
16
---
---
2
---
7.5
22
---
---
5
14.5
27
4.6
21.8
20.3
62.6
11.8
70
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
-0.01907
0.0058
0.0050
0.07613
0.01189
70
Pool Length (ft)
3
---
10
26
---
---
3
---
10
41
---
---
4
22.5
47
3.8
19.5
17.7
44.1
10.3
72
Pool Max depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
1.4
2.5
2.6
3.3
0.5
71
Pool Spacing (ft)
21
---
39.5
67
---
---
5
---
34
47
---
---
30
45
64
26.7
71.1
67.4
333.4
42.1
69
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
23
---
30
52
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
31
59
95
31
---
59
95
---
---
Radius of Curvature (ft)
9
---
15
45
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
15
72.5
149
15
---
72.5
149
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
--
---
Meander Wavelength (ft)
50
---
57
151
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
62
185
347
62
185
347
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
1.8
---
2.8
4.3
---
---
---
---
---
---
4
8
12
4
---
8
12
---
---
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f2
---
---
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
--
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E4 / C4 / G4c / G5 / E4 / E5
E4/5
E4 / E5
E4 / E5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
---
---
20-25
---
---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
---
---
---
19 / 30 / 32 / 34
Valley length (ft)
513 / 1136 / 1170 / 1936
901
513 / 1136 / 1170 / 1936
---
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
556 / 1193 / 1287 / 1958
1074
621 / 1281 / 1264 / 2286
---
Sinuosity (ft)
1.08 / 1.05 / 1.1 / 1.01
1.19
1.21 / 1.13 / 1.08 / 1.18
1.07
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0032 / 0.0042 / 0.0028 / 0.0057
0.008
---
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.0017 / 0.0038 / 0.0022 / 0.0051
0.008
0.0023 / 0.0021
0.0028
3Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
---
---
---
---
4% of Reach with Eroding Bank
---
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Othe
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
* -Reach was split into 4 segments for the purpose of pre-existing data collection.
1 - The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 -For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification -rue).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 -Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Polecat Mitigation Site - Reach KZ3: 183 feet
Parameter
Gauge'
Regional curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
3.0
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
7.0
---
---
---
6.8
---
---
---
Floodprone Width (ft)
---
---
6.0
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
>16
---
---
---
49.9
---
---
---
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
1.1
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.6
---
---
---
0.6
---
---
---
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft
---
---
1.4
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.8
---
---
---
1.0
---
---
---
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
1 ---
I ---
I ---
1 3.3
1 ---
4.4
---
---
4.4
Width/Depth Ratio
2.7
7.4
---
---
---
10.6
Entrenchment Ratio
2.0
>2.2
>7.3
'Bank Height atil
---
---
1.0
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
4.9
9.0
8.0
15.0
4.5
4
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
-0.00879
0.00783
0.00681
0.02651
0.01464
4
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
3.0
5.5
4.8
9.2
2.7
4
Pool Max depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
1.4
1.6
1.6
1.9
0.2
4
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
15.4
28.8
24.4
46.5
16.0
3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Meander Wavelength (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
I ransport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
---
---
---
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
---
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/M2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G5
---
E5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
---
---
---
---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
---
---
---
6
Valley length (ft)
471
---
174
---
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
476
---
183
---
Sinuosity (ft)
1.01
---
1.05
1.03
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.0085
---
0.0042
0.0063
3 Bankfull Flood lain Area (acres
---
---
---
---
4% of Reach with Eroding Bank
---
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metrici
T
Biological or Otheq
I
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 - The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 - For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rue).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 - Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvaluc/nccdcd only if the n exceeds 3

Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Polecat Mitigation Site - Reach KZ5: 152 feet
Parameter
Gauge 2
Regional curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
4.6
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
6.0
---
---
---
6.5
---
---
---
Floodprone Width (ft)
---
---
8.0
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
>14
---
---
---
>49.8
---
---
---
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
0.5
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.7
---
---
---
0.6
---
---
---
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft
---
---
1.0
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.9
---
---
---
1.0
---
---
---
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
1 ---
I ---
I ---
1 2.2
1 ---
4.1
---
---
---
1 3.8
Width/Depth Ratio
9.8
8.9
---
---
---11.1
Entrenchment Ratio
5.4
>2.2
>7.7
'Bank Height atil
---
---
1.0
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
7.9
9.7
8.7
13.7
2.7
4
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.00478
0.01047
0.01069
0.01571
0.0051
4
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
2.2
5.6
5.3
9.2
3.5
3
Pool Max depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
1.2
1.4
1.5
1.5
0.2
3
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
26.8
41.4
41.4
56.1
20.8
2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Meander Wavelength (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
I ransport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
---
---
---
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
---
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/M2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G5
---
E5
E5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
---
---
---
---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
---
---
---
4
Valley length (ft)
473
---
148
---
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
482
---
152
---
Sinuosity (ft)
1.02
---
1.03
1.06
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.0096
---
0.0034
0.0079
3 Bankfull Flood lain Area (acres
---
---
---
---
4% of Reach with Eroding Bank
---
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metrici
T
Biological or Otheq
I
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 - The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 - For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rue).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 - Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvaluc/nccdcd only if the n exceeds 3

Table 9. Cross Section Morphology Data Table
Polecat Site
Cross Section 1 (Pool)
Cross Section 2 (Shallow)
Cross Section 3 (Shallow)
Cross Section 4 (Run)
Cross Section 5 (Shallow)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
138.9
139.0
139.0
138.9
139.0
139.1
137.0
137.0
137.1
136.2
136.3
136.3
135.5
135.7
135.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.9
14.0
14.1
12.4
13.7
15.2
11.7
11.1
13.7
6.8
6.7
6.7
16.3
18.7
13.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50.1
N/A
N/A
>49.5
>49.7
>49.7
>49.9
>49.8
>50
>49.9
>50.2
>50.1
>74.2
>74.5
>74.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.6
0.7
0.6
1.0
0.9
1.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.4
1 2.6
2.6
1.6
1.7
1.8
1
1
1
1 1.5
1.6
1 1.6
1.0
1.1
1 1.1
1 1.9
1.9
1 2.0
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.4
N/A
N/A
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.0
1.2
1.1
1.9
1.6
1.7
BanlditO Cross Sectional Area fe
16.3
16.3
16.3
15.0
15.0
15.0
11.8
11.5
11.8
4.4
4.4
4.4
17.0
17.0
17.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.8
12.1
12.3
10.2
12.5
15.4
11.5
10.7
15.9
10.6
10.2
10.4
15.6
20.6
10.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
>4.0
>3.6
>3.3
>4.3
>4.5
>3.6
>7.3
>7.5
>7.4
>4.5
>4.0
>5.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
0.8
0.8
Cross Section 6 (Pool)
Cross Section 7 (Shallow)
Cross Section 8 (Pool)
Cross Section 9 (Shallow)
Cross Section 10 (Shallow)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
1\/fY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
135.2
135.3
135.4
134.1
134.1
134.2
133.3
133.4
133.4
133.4
133.4
133.5
132.6
132.6
132.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.4
15.1
13.8
6.5
7.5
8.4
13.1
12.8
14.1
13.3
13.2
13.3
8.5
8.9
8.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>72.2
N/A
N/A
>49.8
>49.9
>49.9
>72.4
N/A
N/A
>76.4
>76.7
>76.6
>27.8
>28.7
>28.7
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.5
1.3
1.4
0.6
0.5
0.4
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.5
2.5
2.5
1.0
1.1
1.0
2.1
2.3
2.3
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.7
2.1
2.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.0
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
0.9
2.1
N/A
N/A
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.7
2.3
2.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft�
19.6
19.6
19.6
3.8
3.8
3.8
16.7
16.7
16.7
15.6
15.6
15.6
10.0
10.0
10.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.2
11.7
9.7
11.1
14.7
19.0
10.4
9.8
11.8
11.3
11.2
11.3
7.3
7.9
7.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
>7.7
>6.7
>5.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
>5.8
>5.8
>5.8
>3.3
>3.2
>3.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
0.9
0.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
Cross Section 11 (Shallow)
Cross Section 12 (Pool)
Cross Section 13 (Shallow)
Cross Section 14 (Pool)
Cross Section 15 (Shallow)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
1\/fY3
1\/fY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
1\/fY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) use
131.7
131.9
131.9
130.8
130.8
130.8
131.1
131.1
131.1
129.6
129.7
129.6
129.3
129.3
129.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.1
14.8
15.5
10.7
11.4
11.3
12.5
12.8
12.8
14.0
22.3
15.8
14.0
13.6
13.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
>48.6
>49.9
>50.2
>45
N/A
N/A
>50.3
>50.1
>50.1
>50.1
N/A
N/A
->50.1
>50.0
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.9
1.2
1.7
1.3
1.3
1.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.9
2.1
2.1
1.9
1.9
1.9
2.8
2.8
2.7
2.0
1.9
2.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.9
N/A
N/A
1.9
2.1
2.0
2.8
N/A
N/A
2.0
2.0
2.2
BanlduO Cross Sectional Area(ft 2
15.1
15.1
15.1
13.7
13.7
13.7
14.7
14.7
14.7
26.3
26.3
26.3
18.1
18.1
18.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.3
14.5
15.8
8.3
9.4
9.4
10.6
11.1
11.1
7.5
19.0
9.5
10.8
10.3
10.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.7
>3.4
>3.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
>4.0
>3.9
>3.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
>3.6
>3.7
>3.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
0.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.1
1.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 16 (Shallow)
Cross Section 17 (Pool)
Cross Section 18 (Pool)
Cross Section 19 (Shallow)
Cross Section 20 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
128.9
128.9
128.9
128.8
128.8
128.7
126.3
126.7
126.8
126.4
126.3
126.3
125.5
125.7
125.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.1
14.0
14.2
14.3
14.9
13.8
12.7
25.4
17.4
14.8
14.7
14.3
12.7
14.8
14.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
>49.9
>49.9
>50
N/A
N/A
>51.7
N/A
N/A
>50.1
>50.0
>50
-
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.7
1.6
1.8
1.5
0.7
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.6
1.4
1.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.1
2.1
2.2
2.6
1 3.1
3.1
2.6
2.3
2.3
1.7
1.8
2.1
2.5
2.5
2.5
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.1
2.1
2.2
2.6
N/A
N/A
2.6
N/A
N/A
1.7
1.7
2.2
2.5
N/A
N/A
BankfjU Cross Sectional Area ft2
19.9
19.9
19.9
24.5
24.5
24.5
19.0
19.0
19.0
16.6
16.6
16.6
20.5
20.5
20.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.0
9.9
10.1
8.3
9.0
7.8
8.5
34.0
15.9
13.3
13.0
12.3
7.9
10.7
9.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.5
>3.6
>3.5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>3.4
>3.4
>3.5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
Cross
Section
21
(Shallow)
Cross Section
22
(Run)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
125.3
125.4
125.4
124.9
124.9
124.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.9
14.5
13.1
11.6
11.3
11.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>49.9
>50.0
>50
>32.9
>30.4
>31.5
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.0
1.1
0.4
0.4
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.7
1.9
2.0
0.8
0.7
0.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.7
1.8
2.0
0.8
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
14.2
14.2
14.2
4.7
4.7
4.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.8
14.7
12.1
28.6
27.5
27.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.9
>3.5
>3.8
>2.8
>2.7
>2.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.2
1.0
* Annual measurements are based on fixed baseline cross sectional area.

Table 10. Stream Reach Data Summary
Polecat Mitigation Site - Reaches KZ2, KZ4, KZ6, MI1: 5,203 feet
Parameter
Baseline
W-1
W-2
W- 3
MY- 5
W- 7
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft
11.6
13.3
13.1
16.3
1.4
11
11.1
13.85
13.7
18.7
2.0
11
8.8
13.4
13.7 15.5
1.8
11
Floodprone Width (ft
>32.9
>52.9
>50
>76.4
12.2
11
>30.4
>52.8
>50
>76.7
12.7
11
28.7
52.7
50.0 76.6
13.0
11
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft
0.4
1.1
1.2
1.4
0.3
11
0.4
1.1
1.1
1.4
0.3
11
0.9
1.2
1.2 1.4
0.2
11
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft
0.8
1 1.7
1.7
2.1
0.3
11
0.7
1.7
1.8
1 2.1
0.4
1 11
1.6
1.9
2.0 1 2.2
0.2
11
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ff)
4.7
1 14.8
15.1
19.9
4.0
11
4.7
14.8
15.1
19.9
4.0
11
10.0
15.3
15.1 19.9
2.8
11
Width/Depth Rati
10.0
13.2
11.3
28.6
5.4
11
9.9
14.2
12.5
27.5
5.4
11
7.8
12.0
11.3 15.9
2.6
11
Entrenchment Rati
>2.8
>4.0
>3.9
>5.8
0.8
11
1 >2.7
>3.8
>3.6
>5.8
0.8
11
3.2
3.9
3.6 5.8
0.9
11
Bank Height Rati
1.0
1.0
1.0
100!
0.0
11
0.8
1.0
1.0
1.2
0.1
11
0.8
1.0
1.0 1.1
0.1
11
Profile
Shallow Length (ft
4.59
21.83
20.31
11.81
70
Shallow Slope (ft/ft
-0.02
0.006
0.005
0.076
0.012
70
Pool Length (ft
3.75
19.47
17.74
44.13
10.32
72
Pool Max depth (ft]
1.364
2.499
2.554
3.321
0.457
71
Pool Spacing (ftj
26.73
171.12
167.45
333.4
42.15
1 69
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft
31
--- 59 95 --- ---
Radius of Curvature (ft
15
--- 72.5 149 --- ---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft
---
--- --- --- --- ---
Meander Wavelength (ft
62
--- 185 347 --- ---
Meander Width Ratiol
4
1 --- 1 8 1 12 1 --- I ---
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classiticatio
E4 / E5
Channel Thalweg length (ft
---
Sinuosity (ft
1.07
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft
---
Channel slope (ft/ft
0.0028
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / SO
--- --- --- --- ---
'SC%/ Sa%/ G%/ C%/ B%/ Be°/
'd16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Bank
---
EW
Channel Stability or Habitat Metri
---
Biological or Othe
---
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 10. Stream Reach Data Summary
Polecat Mitigation Site - Reach KZ3: 183 feet
Parameter
Baseline
W-1
W-2
W- 3
W_ 5
W- 7
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
---
6.8
---
---
---
---
---
6.7
---
---
---
---
---
6.7
---
---
---
Floodprone Width (ft
---
---
49.9
---
---
---
---
---
>50.2
---
---
---
---
---
>50.1
---
---
---
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft
0.6
0.7
0.6
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.0
1.1
1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ff)
4.4
4.4
4.4
Width/Depth Ratio
10.6
10.2
10.4
Entrenchment Ratic
>7.3
>7.5
>7.4
Bank Height Rati
1.0
---
---
---
---
---
1.1
---
---
---
1
Profile
Shallow Length (ft
4.89
8.975
8.02
14.97
4.486
4
Shallow Slope (ft/ft
-0.01
0.008
0.007
0.027
0.015
4
Pool Length (ft
3
5.465
4.815
9.23
2.694
4
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.446
1.615
1.569
1.876
0.185
4
Pool Spacing (ft)
15.38
28.76
24.42
46.49
1 16
1 3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
---
---
--- ---
---
---
Meander Wavelength (ft
Meander Width Rati
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classiticatio
Channel Thalweg length (ft
Sinuosity (ft
1.03
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.0063
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S°/
---
---
--- ---
---
'SC%/ Sa%/ G%/ C%/ B%/ Be°/
'd16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Bank
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric!
Biological or Othe
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 10. Stream Reach Data Summary
Polecat Mitigation Site - Reach KZS: 152 feet
Parameter
Baseline
W-1
W-2
W- 3
W_ 5
W- 7
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
---
6.5
---
---
---
---
---
7.5
---
---
---
---
---
8.4
---
---
---
Floodprone Width (ft
---
---
>49.8
---
---
---
---
---
>49.9
---
---
---
---
---
>49.9
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft
---
---
0.6
---
---
---
---
---
0.5
---
---
---
---
---
0.4
---
---
---
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
---
---
1.0
---
---
---
---
---
1.1
---
---
---
---
---
1
---
---
---
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ff)
---
---
3.8
---
---
---
---
---
3.8
---
---
---
---
---
3.8
---
---
---
Width/Depth Ratio
---
---
11.1
---
---
---
---
14.7
---
---
---
---
---
19
---
Entrenchment Rati
---
---
>7.7
---
---
---
---
---
>6.7
---
---
---
---
---
>5.9
---
---
'Bank Height Rati
---
---
1.0
---
---
---
---
---
0.9
---
---
---
---
---
0.9
---
---
---
Profile
Shallow Length (ft
7.99
9.723
9.665
13.69
2.677
4
Shallow Slope (ft/ft
0.005
0.01
0.011
0.016
0.005
4
Pool Length (ft
2.16
5.553
5.35
9.15
3.499
3
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.186
1.408
1.506
1.532
0.193
3
Pool Spacing (ft)
26.76
41.44
41.44
56.12
20.76
2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft
---
--
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
---
--- ---
---
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
---
---
--- ---
---
---
Meander Wavelength (ft
---
---
--- ---
---
---
Meander Width Rati
--
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classiticatio
E5
Channel Thalweg length (ft
---
Sinuosity (ft
1.06
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft
---
Channel slope (ft/ft
0.0079
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S°/
---
---
--- ---
---
'SC%/ Sa%/ G%/ C%/ B%/ Be-7
'd16 / d35 / d50 / 784 / d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Bank
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metri
---
Biological or Othe
___
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Appendix E
Hydrology Data

Table 11. 2019 Rainfall Summary
Month
Average
Normal
Limits
Smithfield Station
Precipitation
30
Percent
70
Percent
January
4.24
3.18
4.95
2.35
February
3.66
2.46
4.37
4.07
March
4.57
3.38
5.36
3.05
April
3.24
1.93
3.93
5.52
May
4.16
2.83
4.97
2.52
June
4.14
2.63
5.00
6.17
July
5.14
3.37
6.17
11.31
August
4.58
2.97
5.51
1.64
September
4.54
2.15
5.54
5.34
October
3.16
1.75
3.89
---
November
2.95
1.81
3.57
---
December
3.05
1.96
3.67
---
Total
47.43
30.42
56.93
41.97
Table 12. Documentation of Significant Flow Events
Year
Bankfull Events
Maximum Bankfull Height (ft)
Estimated Date of Highest Event
Crest Gauge 1 (KZ2)
M Y12018
3
1.05
9/ 15/2018
MY2 2019
2
1.51
7/12/2019
Crest Gauge 2 (KZ6)
MYl 2018
3
1.47
9/14/2018
MY2 2019
2
2.18
7/12/2019
Crest Gauge 3 (1\4I1)
MY12018
8
1.77
9/15/2018
MY2 2019
10
2.40
7/12/2019

Crest Gauge Reading Photos
Crest Gauge 1 (KZ2) — No Manual Reading — General Condition Photo
Crest Gauge 2 (KZ6) — 2.18 feet

l' i
La
tit
41
A' Ziii»' a
e };
_r.