20140705 Ver 2_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20191018

ID#* 20140705
Select Reviewer:*
Mac Haupt
Initial Review Completed Date 10/21/2019
Mitigation Project Submittal - 10/18/2019
Version* 2
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?*
Type of Mitigation Project:*
V Stream r Wetlands r Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Kasey Carrere
Project Information
..................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20140705
Existing IDY
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Selma Mill
County: Johnston
Document Information
r Yes r No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:*2
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Closeout Report
File Upload: Selma Mill MY2 Report.pdf 14.73MB
Rease upload only one RDF of the conplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Ryan Medric
Signature:*

Ores
October 18, 2019
Samantha Dailey
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
RE: Selma Mill Year 2 Monitoring Report (SAW-2015-00710)
Ms. Dailey,
302 Jefferson St. Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Corporate Headquarters
5020 Montrose Blvd. Suite 650
Houston, TX 77006
Main: 713.520.5400
Please find attached the Selma Mill Year 2 Monitoring Report. In Year 2, 23 of the 25 vegetation
plots met the 320 stems per acre success criteria. The areas in and around the two plots that
did not meet success will be supplemental planted in the end of 2019 or early 2020. The small
encroachment area (0.05 ac) that was observed along the road in MY1 was observed again in
MY2. RES plans to keep communicating with the landowner as well as adding additional
easement markers to this area. The only stream problem area was an eroded cut bank (30 feet)
on the downstream section of Reach A.
RES is requesting a 10% credit release (730.50 SMU).
Thank you,
6W-4�116�
Ryan Medric I Ecologist

SELMA MILL STREAM
MITIGATION SITE
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
YEAR 2 MONITORING REPORT
Neuse River Basin
CU 03020201
Provided by:
fires
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
919-209-1052
October 2019

Table of Contents
1.0 Project Summary ...............................................
1.1 Project Location and Description ........
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives ..............
1.3 Pro_ject Success Criteria .......................
Stream Success Criteria .............................
Vegetation Success Criteria .......................
1.4 Project Components ............................
1.5 Design/Approach.................................
1.6 Construction and As -Built Conditions
1.7 Year 2 Monitoring Performance..........
Vegetation..................................................
Stream Geomorphology .............................
StreamHydrology ......................................
2.0 Methods............................................................
3.0 Reference..........................................................
.................................................................................... 3
.................................................................................... 3
.................................................................................... 4
.................................................................................... 4
.................................................................................... 4
.................................................................................... 5
.................................................................................... 5
.................................................................................... 6
.................................................................................... 6
.................................................................................... 6
.................................................................................... 6
.................................................................................... 7
.................................................................................... 7
.................................................................................... 7
.................................................................................... 8
Appendix A: Background Tables
Table 1: Project Mitigation Components
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3: Project Contacts Table
Table 4: Project Contacts Table
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View
Vegetation Plot Photos
Stream and Vegetation Problem Areas
Appendix C: Vegetation Plot Data
Table 5: Planted Species Summary
Table 6: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
ADUendix D: Stream Measurement and GeomornholoLyv Data
MY2 Overlay Cross -Section Plots
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 9. Cross Section Morphology Data Table
Table 10. Stream Reach Morphology Data Table
Annendix E: HvdroloLyv Data
Table 11. 2019 Rainfall Summary
Table 12. Documentation of Geomorphically Significant Flow Events
Crest Gauge Reading Photos
MY2 Headwater Valley Restoration Stream Flow Hydrograph
Selma Mill 2 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site October 2019

1.0 Proiect Summary
1.1 Project Location and Description
The Selma Mill Stream Mitigation Site (the "Site") is located within a watershed dominated by agricultural
and residential land use in Johnston County, North Carolina. Prior to construction, the project streams were
significantly impacted by channelization and agricultural practices. The project involves the restoration and
protection of streams in the Neuse River watershed. The purpose of this mitigation site is to restore and
enhance a stream/wetland complex located within the Neuse River Basin. The Site has been designed in
concurrence with the Selma Mill Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Bank. EBX-Neuse I, LLC
("EBX"), acting as the Bank Sponsor, established a Conservation Easement and will monitor the Site for a
minimum of seven years in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Neu -Con Wetland and Stream
Umbrella Mitigation Bank.
The Site is in Johnston County immediately north of Selma, NC (Figure 1). The latitude and longitude for
the site is 35.547353 °N and-78.282503 °W. The site extends approximately 2,300 feet north on the west
side of NC HWY 96 beginning immediately north of W Chestnut Street. A tributary crosses NC HWY 96
approximately 1,900 feet north of W Chestnut Street and extends approximately 1,600 feet west.
The Site consisted of stream restoration on tributaries that drain directly to Mill Creek. The project presents
6,771 linear feet of Stream Restoration generating 7,305 Stream Mitigation Units (SMU). A combination
of Priority 1 and Priority 2 restoration was used on Reaches A and B and Headwater Valley Restoration on
Reach C. Benefits include the storage of excess water during flood events, preventing erosion of stream
banks, reducing in -stream sedimentation, and nutrient reductions. SMU totals were adjusted using the most
recent non-standard buffer width guidance documents.
The Site consisted of agricultural fields, cattle pastures and wooded areas. The total easement area is 34.2
acres. The wooded areas along the easement corridor designated for restoration activities are classified as
mixed pines and hardwoods. Invasive species are present throughout the wooded areas. Restoration
channels were degraded to a point where they could no longer access their floodplain, lack riparian buffers,
allow livestock access, and aquatic life was not supported. Little aquatic habitat was available to support
aquatic life, and the riparian buffers were not maximizing their potential to filter nutrients.
The Site will be monitored on a regular basis and a physical inspection of the site will be conducted at a
minimum of twice per year throughout the seven-year post -construction monitoring period, or until
performance standards are met. These site inspections will identify site components and features that require
routine maintenance. The measure of stream restoration success will be documented by bankfull flows and
no change in stream channel classification. Sand bed channels are dynamic and minor adjustments to
dimension and profile are expected. The measure of vegetative success for the site will be the survival of
at least 210 seven-year old planted trees per acre with an average height of 10 feet at the end of year seven
of the monitoring period.
Upon approval for closeout by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the site will be transferred to the North
Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation (NCWHF). The NCWHF will be responsible for periodic inspection
of the site to ensure that restrictions required in the Conservation Easement or the deed restriction
document(s) are upheld.
Selma Mill 3 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site October 2019

1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The 2010 Neuse River Basin River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) identified several restoration needs
for the entire Neuse River Basin, as well as for I UC 03020201, specifically. The Site was identified as a
stream restoration opportunity to improve water quality, habitat, and hydrology within the Neuse 01 River
Basin.
The project goals address stressors identified in the TLW and include the following:
• Nutrient removal,
• Sediment removal,
• Invasive species treatment,
• Filtration of runoff, and
• Improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat.
The project goals will be addressed through the following project objectives:
• Exclusion of livestock,
• Treatment of exotic invasive species,
• Restoration of forested riparian stream buffers,
• Stabilization of eroding stream banks due to lack of vegetation and livestock hoof shear,
• Addition of large woody debris, such as log vanes, log weirs, root wads,
• Preservation and enhancement of hydrology in existing riparian wetland seeps, and
• Restoration of appropriate pattern, dimension, and profile in stream channels.
1.3 Project Success Criteria
The Site follows the USACE 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines and subsequent guidance. The Mitigation
Plan was approved in August 2016 and therefore does not adhere to the 2016 Wilmington District Stream
and Wetland Mitigation Update. Cross section data will be reported in Years 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and vegetation
and stream hydrology data will be reported annually.
Stream Success Criteria
Two bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The two bankfull
events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until two bankfull
events have been documented in separate years.
There should be little change in as -built cross -sections. If changes do take place, they should be evaluated
to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for example down -cutting or
erosion), or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling, vegetative
changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross -sections shall be classified
using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross -sections should fall within the
quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type. Bank height ratio shall not exceed
1.2, and the entrenchment ratio shall be no less than 2.2 within restored reaches. Channel stability should
be demonstrated through a minimum of two bankfull events documented in the seven-year monitoring
period.
Digital images will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion,
success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal images should
not indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in channel depth.
Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks over time. A
Selma Mill 4 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site October 2019

series of images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian vegetation.
Headwater valley restoration reaches will be monitored to document intermittent or seasonal surface flow.
This will be accomplished through direct observation, photo documentation, and the use of stream gauge
transducers with data loggers. Reaches must demonstrate a minimum of 30 consecutive days of flow.
Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the site will follow
IRT Guidance. Vegetation monitoring plots will be a minimum of 0.02 acres in size, and cover a minimum
of two percent of the planted area. Vegetation monitoring will take place annually between July 15 and
leaf drop. The interim measures of vegetative success for the site will be the survival of at least 320 planted
three-year old trees per acre at the end of Year 3, 260 five-year old trees at the end of Year 5, and the final
vegetative success criteria will be 210 trees per acre with an average height of 10 feet at the end of Year
7. The site includes 25 monitoring plots to monitor the 29.8 planted acres. Volunteer trees will be counted,
identified to species, and included in the yearly monitoring reports, but will not be counted towards the
success criteria of total planted stems.
1.4 Project Components
The project area is comprised of a single easement area along three tributaries that flow into Mill Creek.
The easement is separated by a crossing at NC HWY 96. The western portion of the project originates near
the intersection of Hwy 96 and W Chestnut Street and includes Reaches Al, A2, and 133. The eastern portion
of the project is located in an agricultural field to the east of NC HWY 96. This area includes Reaches 131,
132, and C. The stream mitigation components are summarized below and in Table 1.
Mitigation
Stationing
Existing
ProposedMitigation
Base
Adjusted
Reach Type*
(Proposed)
Length
Length
Ratio
SMUs**
SMUs***
(LF)
(LF)
A
P2 Restoration
0+61 to 19+42
1,514
1,881
1:1
1,881
2,068
A
P1/P2 Restoration
19+72 to 27+30
630
758
1:1
758
821
A
P1 Restoration
27+60 to 34+45
571
685
1:1
685
801
B
P2 Restoration
1+94 to 10+39
741
845
1:1
845
903
B
P1/P2 Restoration
10+72 to 22+95
1,062
1,223
1:1
1,223
1,334
B
P2 Restoration
23+55 to 28+59
405
504
1:1
504
503
C
HWV Restoration
0+96 to 11+31
852
875
1:1
875
875
Total
5,775
6,771
6,771
7,305
*P1 =Priority
1; P2 =Priority 2; HWV- Headwater Valley
**Reach C SMUs based on valley length minus 30 feet for the proposed crossing
***See Mitigation Plan for SMU adjustments based on non-standard buffer widths.
Selma Mill 5 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site October 2019

1.5 Design/Approach
The design approach for the Selma Mill Site combined the analog method of natural channel design with
analytical methods to evaluate stream flows and hydraulic performance of the channel and floodplain. The
analog method involves the use of a "template" stream adjacent to, nearby, or previously in the same
location as the design reach. The template parameters of the analog reach are replicated to create the features
of the design reach. The analog approach is useful when watershed and boundary conditions are similar
between the design and analog reaches (Skidmore, et al., 2001). Hydraulic geometry was developed using
analytical methods in an effort to identify the design discharge.
Priority Level 2 restoration was done on Reaches Al, A2, B1, B2, and B3. Priority 1 Restoration was done
on Reach A2 below the confluence with Reach B. For most of the restoration reaches, the channel was
rerouted to adjacent natural valley features. By rerouting the channel and constructing floodplain benches,
the design allows the channel frequent access to its floodplain and the opportunity to create small,
depressional areas within the buffer to enhance habitat for wildlife and aquatic organisms. The headwater
valley restoration approach was done along Reach C. The ditch was plugged and then backfilled to the
extent possible such that cut and fill is balanced along the reach.
1.6 Construction and As Built Conditions
Stream construction was completed in August 2017. The Site was built to design plans and guidelines. No
major changes or modifications were made during construction activities. Final floodplain grading was
completed in May 2018 along with planting and fencing.
1.7 Year 2 Monitoring Performance
The Selma Mill Year 2 Monitoring (MY2) activities were completed in September 2019. All MY data is
present below and in the appendices. The Site is on track to meeting vegetation and stream interim success
criteria.
Vegetation
Monitoring of the 25 permanent vegetation plots was completed during September 2019. Vegetation data
are in Appendix C and associated photos are in Appendix B. MY data indicates that 23 of the 25 plots
are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from
202 to 1,335 planted stems per acre with a mean of 808 planted stems per acre across all plots. Vegetation
Plot 10 fell three trees short of the interim success criteria and Vegetation Plot 20 fell two trees short of the
interim success criteria. The areas in and around these plots will be supplemental planted in 2019/2020. A
total of 25 species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species were noted in 20 of the vegetation
plots. The average tree height observed was 3.4 feet.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the majority of the project. The old road used to haul the excess dirt
from the site along the top of Reach B, however, may need to be reseeded in 2019. RES will keep an eye
on this area during future monitoring events. Additionally, the lower end of Reach A will be revisited in
2019 to treat any Chinese privet (Ligustmm sinense) that may be re -sprouting. There still is a small (0.05
acre) area of encroachment along Highway 96 that RES will continue to monitor and communicate to the
landowner that mowing is prohibited in the easement.
Selma Mill 6 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site October 2019

Stream Geomorphology
Geomorphology data for MY2 was collected during September 2019. Summary tables and cross
section/profile plots are in Appendix D. Overall the MY2 cross sections relatively match the as -built
conditions. Cross Section 19 showed about one foot of bed scour in MY but has remained stable in MY2.
Bank height ratios remain less than 1.2 and entrenchment ratios greater than 2.2.
Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability, such as eroding
banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. The channel is transporting sediment as designed
and will continue to be monitored for aggradation and degradation. One area of bank erosion was observed
on Reach A upstream of Cross Section 11. This area was about 30 feet of bank erosion on the outside of a
meander bend. The problem is not systematic and will be revisited next monitoring year to assess severity.
Stream Hydrology
Crest gauges and flow gauges were installed on Reach A and Reach B and a flow gauge was installed on
Reach C. Seventeen total bankfull events were recorded in 2019; 13 on Reach A and four on Reach B. The
flow gauge recorded 120 consecutive flow days on the Headwater Valley Restoration Reach C. Gauge
locations can be found on Figure 2 and hydrology data is in Appendix E.
2.0 Methods
Stream monitoring was conducted using a Topcon GTS-312 Total Station. Three-dimensional coordinates
associated with cross-section data was collected in the field (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS 3200).
Morphological data was collected at 28 cross -sections. Survey data was imported into CAD, ArcGIS®, and
Microsoft Excel® for data processing and analysis. In April 2018 crest gauges and flow gauges were
installed on Reaches A and B and a flow gauge was installed on Reach C. The flow gauges were installed
within the channel and will continuously record flow conditions at an hourly interval. The crest gauges
were installed on the bank at the bankfull elevation. During quarterly visits to the Site, the height of the
corkline will be recorded. HOBO data from the flow gauges will be corrected using bankfull recordings
from the crest gauges. If there are no corkline readings, the height of the top of bank and water depth will
be recorded and bankfull events will be calculated in Excel. The flow gauge on the headwater valley
restoration reach is calibrated to the height of the nearest downstream riffle to document consecutive flow
days.
Vegetation success is being monitored at 25 permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation plot monitoring
follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes
analysis of species composition and density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry
tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal
conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the origin each monitoring year.
Selma Mill 7 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site October 2019

3.0 Reference
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual,
Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Harman, W., R. Starr, M. Carter, K. Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, C. Miller. 2012. A Function -
Based Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects. US Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC EPA 843-K-12-006.
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). `Broad River Basin Restoration Priorities
2009." (September 2014).
Resource Environmental Solutions (2016). Selma Mill Stream Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan.
Rosgen, D. (1996), Applied River Morphology, 2nd edition, Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
Fourth Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2003. April 2008 NC Stream Mitigation Guidelines.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W.
Lichvar, and C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-10-20. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and
Development Center.
Selma Mill 8 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site October 2019

Appendix A
Background Tables

Table 1. Selma Mill Stream Mitigation Site - Mitigation Assets and Components
Existing
Mitigation
Project
Wetland
Footage
Plan
Approach
Adjusted
Component
Position and
or
Footage or
Restoration
Priority
Mitigation
Mitigation
Mitigation
(reach ID, etc.)'
HydroType'
Acreage
Stationing
Acreage
Level
Level
Ratio (X:1)
Credits
Credits°
Notes/Comments
IV
Full Channel Restoration, Channel Relocation, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent
Reach A
1,514
0+61 to 19+42
1,881
R
P2
1
1,881
2,068
Conservation Easement
Fu11 Channel Restoration, Channel Relocation, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent
Reach A
630
19+72 to 27+30
758
R
P1/P2
1
758
821
Conservation Easement
Full Channel Restoration, Channel Relocation, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent
Reach A
571
27+60 to 34+45
685
R
P1
1
685
801
Conservation Easement
Reach B
741
1+94 to 10+39
845
R
P2
1
845
903
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation Easement.
Reach B
1,062
10+72 to 22+95
1,223
R
P1/P2
1
1,223
1,334
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation Easement.
Full Channel Restoration, Channel Relocation, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent
Reach B
405
23+55 to 28+59
504
R
P2
1
504
503
Conservation Easement
Reach C
852
0+96 to 11+31
875
R
I HWV
1 1
1 875
875
HWV Reetoration, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation Easement
Length and Area Summations by Mitigation Category
Stream
(linear feet)
Riparian Wetland
(acres)
on -riparian
Wetland
(acres)
F
Riverine
Non-Riverine
6,771
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
Creation
Preservation
High Quality Pres
Overall Assets Summary
Overall
Asset Category
Credits
Stream
RNR Wetland
NR Wetland
General Note - The above componenttable is intended to be a close complementto the asset map. Each
entry in the above table should have clear distinction and appropriate symbology in the asset map.
1- Wetiand Groups represent pooled wetland polygons in the map with the same wetland type and
restoration level. If some ofthe wetland polygons within a group are in meaningfully different
landscape positions, soil types or have different community targets (as examples), then further
segmentation in the table may be warranted. Wetland features impacted by credit modifiers such as
utilities shall be listed as a distinct record with the impacted acreage tallied as discreet records in the
table (See Wetland 7 above)
2- Wetiand Position and Hydro Type- Indicates Riparian Riverine,(RR), riparinan non-riverine(RNR) or
Non-Riverine (NR)
3- Buffer Assets -due to the complex nature of buffer and nutrient offset assets they are not included
in this example table. Please see the DMS buffer mitigation plan template for the required asset table
information.
4 -Adjusted Mitigation Credits are based on the non-standard buffer widths.

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Selma Mill Stream Mitigation Site
Elapsed Time Since grading complete: 2 years 2 months
Elapsed Time Since planting complete: 1 year 5 months
Number of reporting Years : 2
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
NA
Aug-16
Final Design — Construction Plans
NA
Feb-17
Construction
NA
Aug-17
Containerized, bare root and B&B plantings for reach/segments 1 &2
NA
May-18
As -built (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline)
May-18
Jun-18
Year 1 Monitoring
Nov-18
Dec-18
Year 2 Monitoring
Sep-19
Oct-19
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Year 6 Monitoring
Year 7 Monitoring
= The number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Selma Mill Stream Mitigation Site
Designer
Primary project design POC
WK Dickson
Frasier Mullen [phone]
Construction Contractor
Construction contractor POC
Wright Contracting / PO Box 545, Siler City, NC 273444
Joseph Wright / [phone]
Survey Contractor
Survey contractor POC
Matrix East, PLLC / 906 N. Queen St., Suite A, Kinston, NC
28501
James R. Watson, PLS / [phone]
Planting Contractor
Planting contractor POC
H&J Forestry
Matt Hitch
Seeding Contractor
Contractor point of contact
Wright Contracting / PO Box 545, Siler City, NC 273444
Joseph Wright / [phone]
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource [phone]
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Arborgen [phone]
Monitoring Performers
RES / 302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110, Raleigh, NC 27605
Stream Monitoring POC
Ryan Medric [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Ryan Medric [phone]
Wetland Monitoring POC
N/A

Table 4. Project Background Information
Project Name
Selma Mill
County
Johnston
Project Area (acres)
34.2
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
Latitude: 35.542346 N Longitude:-78.284053 W
Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody Stems Planted)
29.8
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Coastal Plain
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
3020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
3020201100050
DWR Sub -basin
03-04-02
Project Drainage Area (Acres and Square Miles)
583
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
35%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Agriculture, Residential, Forest, Industrial/Commercial
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Al
A2
131
B2
B3
C
Length of reach (linear feet)
938
1625
1396
278
444
921
Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined, unconfined)
X
X
X
X
X
X
Drainage area (Acres and Square Miles)
267
583
138
189
189
42
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
Perennial
Perennial
Perennial
Perennial
Perennial
Intermittent
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Stream Classification (existing)
G5c/B5
G5c
G5c
G5c
G5c
G5c
Stream Classification (proposed)
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
HWV
Evolutionary trend (Simon)
II / IV
II
VI
II
II
II
FEMA classification
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Regulatory Considerations
Parameters
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting
Docs?
Water of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
SAW-2015-
00710
Water of the United States - Section 401
Yes
Yes
DWR # 14-
0705
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
USFWS
(Corr. Letter)
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
SHPO (Corr.
Letter)
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA or CAMA)
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
Yes
Town of
Selma (Corr.
Letter)
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A

r-� -
oao d r
pew
r��G�G d4 pp i .2
yr� p awn
r�
s
3i3
0
� I
Po-
Boykin Ave
Or
pC
p �=1in3
pF'
en �ei�iman
i.4ve -
e I
Primrose St
Zo'
Legend
Conservation Easement
U
2
"4p
A y
w waknw sr a s`
10` a
V,yc ry g fio z Bennett or
r
_ •, c s �"" � a4ae
y, W Chcsin iil •;r `a3� ti
tlP-Can m
lya a°vi'rr m49r ` H'E.4r 2�o ai
�� spy a Nbnrry y �4 -
ti h
�a
PQ-J9 WQ-d sr n
. t+ Sr by Sr
� r _
ry, 2 ey
lure � Lir L`yi�e
Lrh� y
sr Z'
Si ^I
W` y`
Safm.a,tv
e
F ? r riarc
F•i
y a
.�
"I".
:
?
h
r
"ry,s
r St6?F
5
I
qr
ti
aaae�r
Sr
Fr`
y' hti y
sr
h�aG S'f O
y
Sourcek,Esri
HERE Garmin USGS Interma INCREMENT P NRCan Esri
Odin St gE �a � � p,
wp� y Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC,
drp o, OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
N
Date: 12/11 /2018
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
w _ e Drawn by: RTM res
Selma Mill Buffer/Nutrient Site
n s Checked by: BPB
0 500 1.000
Johnston County, North Carolina
1 inch = 1,000 feet
Feet

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

fires
HWV Restoration 2 N
,r
ro W E
Reach B
P2'Restoration,, ,r
0 150 300
u -w 7t:^ _:. I� - - - -� ✓f Feet
v
Figure 2
Reach A Q o s Current Conditions
P1 Restoration e `
Wilk Overview
MY2 2019
21
wR ® Selma Mill Stream
$ 17 Mitigation Site
-
Johnston County, NC
� - P1 Restoration � ;a, 'A
15 Date: 10/15/2019 Drawn by: RTM
z
•� 16 'w `s Lat:35.542346 Long 78.284053
i"'
':
n
K h LEGEND
.' O Conservation Easement
•
Restoration
Reach A `-_ — HWV Restoration
2. _.
Restoration Reach B Vegetation Plot
.f .
s4 P2Restoration.
>320 stems/acre
<320 stems/acre
Existing Wetlands
p of Bank
j Cross Section
®Flow/Crest Gauge
!� _ ■14 ,,' r,. 4 • Rain Gauge/Ambient
' *s . �� `' `„ _ • °.� `' Veaetation Condition Assessment
��.: ' t s m'►/ N Target Community
} , _ rp J v Present Marginal Absent
. ..t T U Absent
w
' �_ .. - E,i ..a..�A'a► ... r No Fill
s ' Existing 1,ength Proposed Length
ha 5
"Reach Mitigation Type' Ratio BaseSMUs* AsjustedSMUs**
R'; �r.. (1 (1 — Present
A P2 Restoration 1,514 1,881 I:I 1,881 2,068 j
A P1/1`2 Restoration 630 758 1:1 758 821 _
A P1 Restoration 571 685 1:1 685 801
B P2 Restoration 741 845 1.1 845 903
B P1/P2 Restoration 1,062 1,223 1.1 1,223 1,334 REFERENCE
Restoration 405 504 1:1 504 503
n- 4 �`+ " •,.,1- '� `� '°�.. kRt „`" IC - ; - ".- • C HWV Restoration 852 875 1:1 875 875 1.)Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017.
TOTAL 5,775 6,771 6,771 7,305
? ! 2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N.
*Reach C SMUs based on valley length ninus 30 feet for the proposed crossing.
t' **See Figure 11 for SMU adjustments based on non-standazd buffer widths.
M T" 4 } 3.) The parcel data information/property
` t` ;4* �'boundaries depicted on this map is for
- a;, ' ` ' prospect assessment purposes only.
N CFe tofo Gr ph Inf rm n & A I I It is not to be used as final boundaries.
#.. f, 31s 41L k.

y� 3
3
- � � . ,� .fib. _ - ; -1 • � 1 f , e r', _ *�• J
•... ia�l' fj[C 4
A.� pe� Tom,. ~ `1l +1 ` ,-r - -1 •rf � 1
yy�� ■ Mr + ti'�t.
h� F
ti
IWT
N-1
Ma
tr�f ... ✓! 1. �} � �jrJ ��'
x �
- s� iL
j
� �, s4 rf t ^'rt r �° � +L,k'' �=c i�i�'i • Wr`.�: Y'�
,,r� c -t
t a';
�r �, •►�rt'�;.+a, "' R
-4 'F
_ a
R,
t. .a r.• - - - ,h
i
Yiz
i
i
u
res
�+ N
W E
S
i.
0 50 100
n
Feet
1
Figure 2
Current Conditions
Plan View
Selma Mill Stream
Restoration Site
MY2 2019
Johnston County, NC
Date: 10/15/2019 Drawn by: RTM
(Page 1)
LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
Vegetation Plot
o >320 stems/acre
© <320 stems/acre
EZ Existing Wetlands
Restoration
HWV Restoration
Cross Section
Top of Bank
MY2 SPA
® Flow/Crest Gauge
Rain Gauge/Ambient
* Vegetation Condition Assessment
w Target Community
v Present Marginal Absent
� U
a Absent No Fill
.�• N Present
>
C
REFERENCE
}
1.) Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017.
2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N.
3.) The parcel data information/property
boundaries depicted on this map is for
prospect assessment purposes only.
It is not to be used as final boundaries.

7
411171,
•
%a
S
ip
�;' AN
Vir
s 4
ly
T ,
Y
r
", P i� .. r � •' / 1 L�'�T .;1�•4 h ray ,sdl, - ,�_ __.
r --
4,
+ s
4
�.;�,. ?��* '� . • ' di ' ' air
LJ�
20 ,each B fires
N
w E
S
0 50 100
Feet
Figure 2
Current Conditions
Plan View
Selma Mill Stream
Restoration Site
MY2 2019
Johnston County, NC
Date: 10/15/2019 Drawn by: RTM
(Page 2)
LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
Vegetation Plot
o >320 stems/acre
= <320 stems/acre
Existing Wetlands
Restoration
HWV Restoration
Cross Section
Top of Bank
MY2 SPA
�- ® Flow/Crest Gauge
Rain Gauge/Ambient
Vegetation Condition Assessment
f w Target Community
T Present Marginal Absent
U
Q Absent No Fill
N
_ w
y Present
REFERENCE
1.)Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017.
2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N.
3.) The parcel data information/property
boundaries depicted on this map is for
prospect assessment purposes only.
It is not to be used as final boundaries.

T
� " • �Y1 * Y' �� � .Y" Y+, ':,r�► t i�. �'itx , •''�a ,4 xr:. j�''y,
.�,gypq,,,, '4i+ F 'v;_ ; ' 'y F ram'
� , . >+.,� ,,. � ,, � . � ►fir„ 1 _ - 4
N.
a
vk
NEEL
ILZ
e r y
CGII ti
T ;
4.
' - V •�4 ''•e . ._✓Gr,'s. _ 7- . `-T: . �:. .. ,N rim' ^ •. � `
N
IL 17
V.
+ 17 Ili
• 1. ";.
-
-
.. 'j.•._!.
10 'All
r.
•
21
Ell
t
8
fires
N
w E
T S
99 0 50 100
Feet
Figure 2
Current Conditions
Plan View
Selma Mill Stream
Restoration Site
MY2 2019
Johnston County, NC
Date: 10/15/2019 Drawn by: RTM
(Page 3)
LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
Vegetation Plot
o >320 stems/acre
= <320 stems/acre
Existing Wetlands
Restoration
HWV Restoration
Cross Section
Top of Bank
MY2 SPA
® Flow/Crest Gauge
Rain Gauge/Ambient
Vegetation Condition Assessment
rn Target Community
w Present Marginal Absent
U
Q Absent No Fill
v
NPresent
c
' REFERENCE
1.)Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017.
2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N.
3.) The parcel data information/property
boundaries depicted on this map is for
prospect assessment purposes only.
It is not to be used as final boundaries.

oz
In
7
11
18
4t
fires
N
W E
S
0 50 100
Feet
Figure 2
Current Conditions
Plan View
Selma Mill Stream
Restoration Site
MY2 2019
Johnston County, NC
Date: 10/15/2019 1 Drawn by: RTM
(Page 4)
LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
Vegetation Plot
= >320 stems/acre
= <320 stems/acre
EZ Existing Wetlands
Restoration
HWV Restoration
Cross Section
Top of Bank
MY2 SPA
(DFlow/Crest Gauge
0 Rain Gauge/Ambient
Vegetation Condition Assessment
U) Target Community
is L Present Marginal Absent
U
Absent No Fill
Present
• >
S
REFERENCE
1.) Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017.
2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N.
3.) The parcel data information/property
boundaries depicted on this map is for
prospect assessment purposes only.
It is not to be used as final boundaries.
0

� fires
.. �� N
i S
' •'S5'§ w �0 50 100
r -5 Feet
= Figure 2
- x
Current Conditions
�..
Plan View
F CG3 Selma Mill Stream
Restoration Site
:r.
y
MY2 2019
Johnston County, NC
iw
� •-'�` �• D t 10/15/2019 Drawn by: RTM
(Page 5)
ANN
LEGEND
,r. '{sib`} w•
�- - O Conservation Easement
t`
y
Vegetation Plot
-
>320 stems/acre
<3 20 stems/acre
EZ Existing Wetlands
- a
Restoration
.. •'*�- , r
H WV Restoration
= � _ Cross Section
Ailz+ _ .
` •�_ _ _ Top of Bank
25 MY2 SPA •. s
.a Flow/Crest Gauge
IP°1t*..>,. �,': ,t
t � Rain Gauge/Ambient
Vegetation Condition Assessment
Community Target
w o unity
p�
Present Marginal Absent
1W ,� Absent No Fill
CG2 tj w
N
Present
>
`. Reach C - c
co
Z3�NREFERENCE
1.)Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017.
Reach g
2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N.
Fill3.) The parcel
ata tip
rty
boundaresdepictdonthsmasfor
[711�
prospect assessment purposes only.
Reachg *g . It is not to be used as final boundaries.
MU N Cr to fo G o pInform

Selma Mill Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1
Vegetation Plot 3
Vegetation Plot 5
Vegetation Plot 2
Vegetation Plot 4
Vegetation Plot 6

"I.
y
h,
Pik ,r
�svn�iryrthn. -
�F TVI?
1 , 09/18/2019

Vegetation Plot 13
Vegetation Plot 15
Vegetation Plot 17
Vegetation Plot 14
Vegetation Plot16
Vegetation Plot 18

''
`� � � a
�,.
.� � �, :s
,, • �„
� �:
�� c'_�� I

Vegetation Plot 25

Stream Problem Areas
Selma Mill
Map Label / Feature Issue / Location
Photo
SPAT / LB Erosion / Reach A
� T
Vegetation Problem Areas
Selma Mill
Map Label / Feature Category / Location / Size
Photo
VPAI / Encroachment / Reach B / 0.05 acres
F! '
VPA2 / Low Stem Density / VP20 / 0.77
acres=..a
:.
VPA3 / Low Stem Density / VP 10 / 0.17 acres

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 5. Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Scientific Name
Total Stems Planted
Green Ash
Froxinus pennsylvanica
6500
Water Oak
Quercus nigra
5500
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
5000
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
5000
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus michauxii
4100
Blackgum
Nyssasylvatica
4000
Yellow -Poplar
Liriodendron tulipifera
3000
River Birch
Betula nigra
2600
Baldcypress
Taxodium distichum
1300
Shumard Oak
Quercus shumardii
1000
Overcup Oak
Quercus lyrata
995
Silky Dogwood
Corpus amomum
502
Buttonbush
Cephalanthus occidentalis
500
Cherrybark Oak
Quercus pagoda
500
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
500
Water Tupelo
Nyssaaquatica
400
Total
41,397
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Planted Stem
Height (ft)
1
931
243
1174
Yes
3.4
2
1 769
81
850
Yes
2.2
3
728
324
1052
Yes
3.1
4
1012
0
1012
Yes
2.7
5
1295
850
2145
Yes
2.4
6
850
121
971
Yes
4.3
7
1093
324
1416
Yes
4.4
8
890
0
890
Yes
3.8
9
445
121
567
Yes
2.9
10
202
40
243
No
3.9
11
526
162
688
Yes
2.5
12
809
162
971
Yes
2.9
13
688
81
769
Yes
3.6
14
728
81
809
Yes
3.6
15
769
0
769
Yes
2.7
16
1012
121
1133
Yes
2.0
17
850
121
971
Yes
3.8
18
486
0
486
Yes
3.2
19
567
121
688
Yes
2.4
20
243
0
243
No
1.8
21
890
0
890
Yes
2.3
22
1255
486
1740
Yes
4.2
23
931
162
1133
Yes
6.9
24
890
162
1052
Yes
3.9
25
1335
364
1700
Yes
3.4
Project Avg
808
165
974
Yes
3.4

Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Selma Mill
Current Plot Data (MY2 2019)
05232018-01-0001
05232018-01-0002
05232018-01-0003
05232018-01-0004
05232018-01-0005
05232018-01-0006
05232018-01-0007
05232018-01-0008
05232018-01-0009
05232018-01-0010
05232018-01-0011
05232018-01-0012
05232018-01-0013
05232018-01-0014
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Betulanigra
river birch
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
2
2
4
1
1
1
11
11
11
6
6
6
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Carya
hickory
Tree
2
Cornusamomum
silkydogwood
Shrub
Crataegus aestivalis
may hawthorn
Shrub Tree
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon
Tree
4
4
4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
101
101
101
1
1
1
1 2
21
21
71
7
7
6
1
1
1
71
7
7
1
1
1
2
2
2
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
3
2
1
1
1
3
1
1
4
4
2
2
Liriodendrontulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
6
6
6
11
1
1
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
Nyssa aquatica
watertupelo
Tree
6
6
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
1
1
1
4
4
4
9
9
9
Pinustaeda
loblolly pine
Tree
3
2
1
Platanusoccidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
21
1 4
4
9
6
6
61
31
3
18
11
1
1
4
4
4
21
21
2
Quercus
oak
Tree
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
10
10
10
7
7
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
12
12
12
5
5
5
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
13
13
13
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
I
I
1
2
2
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
11
1
2
21
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
91
9
9
81
8
8
11
11
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Quercus shumardii
Shumard'soak
Tree
1
1
1
Rhuscopallinum
iflameleafsumac
shrub
1
1
Salixnigra
Iblackwillow
Tree
1
Sambucuscanadensis
ICommon Elderberry
Shrub
1
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
9
9
9
6
6
6
1
11
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
11
11
11
Stem count
231
231
29
191
191
21
18
18
26
25
25
25
321
321
53
211
211
24
271
271
35
221
221
22
111
111
14
51
51
6
13
13
17
20
20
24
17
17
19
18
181
20
size (arcs)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
1 0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Species count
6
6
8
7
7
8
6
6
8
6
6
6
9
9
13
8
8
10
3
3
6
6
6
6
4
4
5
4
4
5
7
7
8
6
6
7
4
4
5
5
5
6
Stems per ACRE
931
1174
7691
7691
850
EMIR
7281
10521
1012
ini?l
1012
1295
1295
2145
850
850
971
1093
1093
1416
890
890
NORM
4451
5671
2021
2021
2431
5261
5261
688
8091
8091
9711
6881
6881
769POWM
7281
809
Selma Mill
I Current Plot Data (MY22019)
Annual Means
05232018-01-0015
05232018-01-0016
05232018-01-0017
05232018-01-0018
05232018-01-0019
05232018-01-0020
05232018-01-0021
05232018-01-0022
05232018-01-0023
05232018-01-0024
05232018-01-0025
MY2(2019)
MY1(2018)
MYO(2018)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
3
3
3
5
5
5
1 1
1
4 4
4
1
1
1
52
52
54
60
60
60
74
74
74
Carya
hickory
Tree
2
Cornusamomum
silkydogwood
Shrub
2 2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
Crataegus aestivalis
may hawthorn
Shrub Tree
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
4
4
4
8
8
8
2
2
2
2
2
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
21
21
21
17
171
171
4 41
61
4 41
41
21 2
2
1
1
1
1
51
51
5
1
1
8
8
8
3
3
3
75
75
83
77
77
77
79
79
79
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
3
3
41
1
9
431
4
Liriodendrontulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1 1
1
11
11
12
18
18
20
46
46
46
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
Nyssa aquatica
watertupelo
Tree
1
1
1
9
9
9
33
33
33
44
44
44
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 2
2
4
4
4
37
37
37
34
34
34
47
47
47
Pinustaeda
loblolly pine
Tree
12
3
21
45
Platanusoccidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
21
21
1
11
11
1
1
1 1
11
41 4
41
1
71
71
7
51 51
5
42
42
62
40
40
401
56
56
56
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1
1
11
11
1
16
16
16
49
49
49
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
5
5
5
3 3
3
51
51
5
7
7
7
20
20
20
12
12
12
18
18
18
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
12
12
12
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
5
5
5
1 1
1
1 1
1
5
5
5
7
7
7
2
2
2
78
78
78
69
69
69
74
74
74
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
2
2
2
1 1
1
1 1
1
1
1
11
6
6
6
11
11
11
13
13
13
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1 3
31
3
1
11
11
1 1
2
4 4
41
21 2
2
11 1
1
9
9
9
81
81
8
13
131
13
1
1
1
16
16
16
88
88
89
107
107
1071
114
114
114
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
16
16
16
2 2
2
1
6
6
6
24
24
24
23
23
23
23
23
23
Quercus shumardii
Shumard'soak
Tree
1
1
1
Rhuscopallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
2
Salixnigra
blackwillow
Tree
1
Sambucuscanadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
1
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
30
30
30
34
34
34
351
351
35
Stem count
191
191
19
2511
1 211
24
12
12
12
14
14
17
6 6
6
221
221
22
311
311
431
241
241
28
22
221
26
33
33
42
500
500
602
541
541
592
6791
6791
679
size (arcs)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1 1
1
1 1
1 25
1 25
1 25
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
1 0.02
0.02
1 0.02
0.02
0.02
1 0.62
1 0.62
1 0.62
Species count
8 8
8
51
51
6
3 3
3
6 6
6
7 7
8
3 31
31
71
51
51
61
51 51
61
51
51
71
61
61
71
191 191
251
171 171
191
16 16
16
Stems per ACRE
769
769
1012
1012
1133
SSOI
971
486
486
567
688
2431
243M
8901
890
890
12551
12551
1740
9711
11331
8901
8901
10521
13351
13351
1700
8091
974
876
958
10991
30991

Appendix D
Stream Measurement and
Geomorphology Data

Upstream
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach A Cross Section 1 - Shallow
165
164
163
° 162
°
w 161
00
160
159
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 1 (Shallow)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation(datum) used
161.8
161.8
162.0
Bankfull Width ft
13.2
13.1
13.7
Floodprone Width ft
>50.2
>50.2
>50.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
1.0
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.8
1.8
1.9
Low Bank Height ft
1.8
1.8
1.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
13.1
13.1
13.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.3
13.2
14.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.8
>3.8
>3.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1.0
1 1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach A Cross Section 2 - Pool
164
163
162
° 161
w 160
159
158
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 2 Pool
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
161.7
161.5
161.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.3
12.7
11.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50.1
>50.0
>50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.5
1.7
1.9
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
2.9
3.2
3.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.9
3.4
2.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
21.5
21.5
21.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.5
7.5
7.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach A Cross Section 3 - Shallow
164
163
162
° 161
w
160
159
158
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
Baseline —MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 3 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
160.1
160.2
160.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.1
17.1
9.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
>50.0
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
0.6
1.1
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.4
1.4
1.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.4
160.1
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
10.6
10.6
10.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.8
27.7
8.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>4.1
>2.9
>5.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1 1.0
0.9
0.8

Upstream
Downstream
162
Selma Mill Reach A Cross Section 4 - Pool
161
160
°
°
w
159
OK
158
157
156
0 3 6 9 12 15
Baseline
18 21 24 27
Distance (ft)
MY1 MY2
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
— — -Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 4 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
160.0
160.1
160.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.2
20.9
19.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
>49.8
>49.9
>49.9
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
0.9
0.9
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
2.8
2.9
2.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.8
2.8
2.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
18.2
18.2
18.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.6
24.0
21.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach A Cross Section 5 - Pool
162
161
160
0 159
w
158
157
OP
156
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 5(Pool)
Based on fixed base ross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
158.8
158.7
158.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.0
11.7
12.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
>50.3
>50.3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
1.3
1.3
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
2.1
2.0
2.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.1
2.2
2.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
15.3
15.3
15.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
1 9.4
8.9
9.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
162
Selma Mill Reach A Cross Section 6 - Shallow
161
°
a)w
160
159
_
158
157
156
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21
Baseline MY1
24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 6 (Shallow)
ased on fixedbaseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
158.7
158.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.4
12.7Floodprone
P58.
Width (ft)
>50.2
>50.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
1.0Bankfull
MaxDepth (ft)
1.6
1.7
.
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.6
1.7
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
12.8
12.8
12.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.0
12.6
12.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
I >3.8
>3.9
>4.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1 1.0
1.0
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach A Cross Section 7 - Shallow
162
161
160
°
Ov
159
w
—100000
00
158
157
156
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 7 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
158.2
158.3
158.5
Bankfu11 Width (ft)
13.2
13.6
14.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
>52.8
>52.9
>52.9
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.8
0.7
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.4
1.4
1.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.4
1.4
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
10.5
10.5
10.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
16.5
17.6
19.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>4.0
>3.9
>3.6
Bankfu11 Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1.0
0.9

Upstream
Downstream
161
Selma Mill Reach A Cross Section 8- Pool
160
°
°
w
159
158
��
cr�
��T�
157
155
Na156
0 3 6 9 12 15
Baseline
18 21 24 27
Distance (ft)
MY1 MY2
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
— — -Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 8(Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfiillelevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
158.1
158.2
158.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.3
12.2
11.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
>48.1
>48.2
>48.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.5
1.4
1.4
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
2.5
2.9
2.6
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.5
3.0
2.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
16.5
16.5
16.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.7
9.0
8.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach A Cross Section 9 - Shallow
160
159
158
°
—
—
157
w
156
155
154
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 9 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
157.2
157.3
157.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.9
18.9
14.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50.1
>50.1
>50.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
0.9
1.1
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
2.0
1.9
1.9
Low Bank Height (it)
2.0
1.8
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
16.3
16.3
16.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.8
22.0
12.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.6
>2.6
>3.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1.0
0.9

Upstream
Downstream
160
Selma Mill Reach A Cross Section 10 - Pool
159
158
°
w
157
156
155
154
0 3 6 9 12 15
Baseline
18 21 24 27
Distance (ft)
MY1 MY2
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
— — -Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 10 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
156.7
156.7
156.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.4
13.4
13.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50.6
>55.2
>55.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (11)
1.2
1.2
1.3
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
2.4
2.5
2.4
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.4
2.6
2.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
16.7
16.7
16.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.8
10.7
10.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
159
Selma Mill Reach A Cross Section 11 - Pool
158
°
157
156
w
_
155
154
153
0 3 6 9 12 15
Baseline
18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 11 Pool
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
155.6
155.6
155.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.0
14.2
15.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50.1
>50.1
>50.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
1.1
1.0
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
2.2
2.2
2.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.2
2.4
2.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
15.7
15.7
15.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.8
12.8
15.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
I N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A

w-
f.
s°-.'
Upstream
J � �! a• � � , ram. .. ��_
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach A Cross Section 12 - Shallow
159
158
157
° 156
w 155
154
153
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull FloodproneArea
Cross Section 12 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
155.9
155.9
156.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.3
13.9
13.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
>50.1
>50.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
1.1
1.1
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
2.1
2.1
2.0
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.1
2.1
1.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
15.6
15.6
15.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.4
12.4
12.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.7
>3.6
>3.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1 1.0
1.0
0.9

Upstream
Downstream
158
Selma Mill Reach A Cross Section 13 - Pool
157
156
°
w
155
154
153
152
0 3 6 9 12 15
Baseline
18 21 24 27
Distance (ft)
MY1 MY2
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
— — -Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 13(Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
155.4
155.5
155.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.4
14.0
13.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
>50.0
>50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.5
1.4
1.4
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
2.7
2.8
2.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.7
2.8
2.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
19.7
19.7
19.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.2
9.9
9.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
I N/A
N/A
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach B Cross Section 14 - Pool
171
170
169
"00,e
°
168
w
167
166
165
0 3 6 9 12 15
Baseline
18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51
Distance (ft)
MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 14(Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfiillelevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
167.9
167.9
168.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.2
17.5
10.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>42.7
>43.4
>43.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
0.7
1.3
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
2.0
1.9
2.0
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.0
1.7
1.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
13.0
13.0
13.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.4
23.7
8.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach B Cross Section 15 -Shallow
171
170
169
w
167
166
165
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 15 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
167.8
167.8
167.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.5
15.9
20.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50.4
>50.4
>50.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.5
0.4
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.6
1.4
1.4
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.6
1.4
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
8.6
8.6
8.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
12.9
29.4
19.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>4.8
>3.2
>3.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1.0
0.9

Upstream
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach B Cross Section 16 - Shallow
171
170
169
° 168
w 167
166
165
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 16 1 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline bankfiill elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
166.9
167.1
167.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.0
13.4
13.2
Floodprone Width (it)
>49.8
>50.1
>50.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (it)
0.8
0.6
0.6
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.4
1.2
1.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.4
1.1
0.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
8.2
8.2
8.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
12.3
22.0
21.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.0
>3.7
>3.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 0.9
1 0.8

Upstream
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach B Cross Section 17 - Pool
170
169
168
° 167
°
w 166
165
164
717-1
1
1
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 17(Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
166.7
166.9
166.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.7
13.1
12.0
Floodprone Width (it)
>49.7
>50.0
>50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
1.0
1.0
Bankfull MaxDepth (it)
2.2
2.2
2.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.2
1.9
1.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
12.6
12.6
12.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.0
13.7
21.1
Banktull Entrenchment Ratio
I N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach B Cross Section 18 - Shallow
169
168
167
° 166
°
w
165
164
163
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
—Baseline MY1 — MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 18 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline bankfiill elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
164.9
165.1
165.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.6
12.4
11.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>56
>56.4
>56.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
0.8
0.8
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.5
1.7
1.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.5
1.7
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
9.4
9.4
9.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.8
16.4
14.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratiol
>5.3
>4.5
>4.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1.0
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach B Cross Section 19 - Pool
167
166
165
° 164
6
w
163
162
161
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 19(Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
164.9
164.8
164.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.1
9.8
9.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
>61.1
>61.1
>61.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
1.4
1.4
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
2.6
3.4
3.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.6
3.7
3.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
13.5
13.5
13.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.1
7.1
6.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
I N/A
I N/A
I N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach B Cross Section 20 - Pool
167
166
165
° 164
w 163
162
161
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 20(Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
163.7
163.7
163.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.4
8.1
8.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50.1
>50.1
>50.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
0.8
0.8
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.5
1.7
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.5
1.6
1.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
6.7
6.7
6.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.2
9.9
11.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
I N/A
I N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach B Cross Section 21 - Shallow
168
167
166
°
165
ID
w 164
163
_ _
_ _
_
_ _
_ _
_
162
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 21 1
Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
163.9
163.9
163.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.1
11.0
10.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50.3
>50.2
>50.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.6
0.6
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.0
1.0
0.9
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.0
0.8
1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
6.6
6.6
6.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
15.4
18.3
17.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.0
>4.6
>4.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
0.8
1.2

Upstream
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach B Cross Section 22 - Shallow
166
165
164
°
163
m
ID
w
_
_
_
_
162
161
160
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section22 1 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevafion (datum) used
162.6
162.7
162.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.7
14.6
13.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50.4
>50.2
>50.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.7
0.7
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.3
1.2
1.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.3
1.1
1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
9.7
9.7
9.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.1
22.1
19.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
1 >4.3
>3.4
>3.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
0.9
0.9

Upstream
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach B Cross Section 23 - Pool
165
164
163
°
162
w
161
160
159
0 3 6 9 12 15
Baseline
18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 23(Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
162.0
162.1
162.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.0
12.4
11.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>48
>50.3
>50.3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.0
1.1
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
2.0
2.4
2.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.0
2.3
2.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
12.5
12.5
12.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.8
12.4
10.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
I N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
I N/A
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach B Cross Section 24 - Pool
162
161
160
°
159
w
158
157
156
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 24 Pool
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
158.4
158.5
158.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.3
12.8
13.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
>44.4
>44.4
>44.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
0.8
0.8
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.7
1.8
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.7
1.8
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
10.7
10.7
10.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.8
15.4
16.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
I N/A
N/A
I N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach B Cross Section 25 - Shallow
162
161
160
°
159
w
__
158
157
156
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 25 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
158.4
158.4
158.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.3
10.3
10.5
Floodprone Width (it)
>50
>50.1
>50.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
0.7
Bankfull MaxDepth (it)
1.3
1.2
1.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.3
1.3
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
7.0
7.0
7.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
15.1
15.3
15.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>4.8
>4.8
>4.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1.0
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach B Cross Section 26 -Shallow
161
160
159
°
158
w
157
156
155
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 26 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
157.8
157.8
157.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.2
10.0
10.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50.3
>50.3
>50.3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.7
0.7
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.3
1.3
1.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.3
1.3
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
7.1
7.1
7.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.9
14.0
15.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.5
>5.0
>4.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1 1.0
1.0
1 0.9

Upstream
w�
Downstream
Selma Mill Reach C Cross Section 27 - Run (HWV)
172
171
170
°
169
w
168
167
166
5 8 11 14 17 20
Baseline
23 26 29 32 35 38 41 44 47 50 53
Distance (ft)
MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 27
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base I MYl I M7 MY3 I MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) use
(Headwater Valley Restoration)
No Morphological Parameters were determined for HW V Reach C
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
Low Bank Height (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio

11 ngfranm
nnw n s4 rpa m
167
Selma Mill Reach C Cross Section 28 - Run (HWV)
166
165
° 164
w 163
_
_
_
_ _ _ _
_ _
_ _
WON
162
161
5 8 11 14 17 20
Baseline
23 26 29 32 35 38 41 44 47 50 53
Distance (ft)
MY1 MY2 — — -Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 28 (HWV)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base I MYl I MY2 I MY3 I MYS I MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
(Headwater Valley Restoration)
No Morphological Parameters were determined for HW V Reach C
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
Low Bank Height (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio

Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Selma Mill Mitigation Site - Reach A: 3,324 feet
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition*
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
---
---
267.0
---
425.0
583.0
---
2
---
---
10.9
---
---
---
---
13.0
---
12.1
13.2
13.3
13.9
0.6
6
Floodprone Width (ft)
32.0
---
36.0
40.0
---
2
---
---
50.0
---
---
---
---
>50
---
50.0
50.6
50.2
52.8
1.1
6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
---
---
---
1.6
---
2.0
2.4
---
2
---
---
1.0
---
---
---
---
1.3
---
0.8
1.0
1.0
1.2
0.2
6
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.5
---
3.0
3.5
---
2
---
---
1.7
---
---
---
---
1.7
---
1.4
1.7
1.7
2.1
0.3
6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
--
--
---
20.2
128.5
1 36.8
1
1 2
11.0
1 ---
I ---
16.5
---
10.5
113.2
113.0
16.3
2.4
6
Width/Depth Ratio
6.4
7.0
7.6
2
11.9
10.2
11.4
13.5
13.6
16.5
1.8
6
Entrenchment Ratio
2.1
>2.2
2
>2.2
>2.2
3.6
3.8
3.8
4.1
0.2
6
'Bank Height Rati1
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 0.0
6
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
4
---
11.5
19.9
---
---
13
30.5
48
4.0
22.2
15.3
71.1
16.1
43
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
-0.02151
0.00759
0.00652
0.05285
0.01491
43
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
6.9
---
17.1
21.6
---
---
13
21
29
8.8
26.8
26.7
55.8
11.3
43
Pool Max depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
2.1
2.6
2.6
4.0
0.4
43
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
40.3
---
63.1
109.8
---
---
48
103.5
159
27.6
80.6
60.1
170.2
37.8
42
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
41.2
---
42.3
43.5
---
---
46
52
58
46
---
52
58
---
---
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
13.1
---
18.4
24.6
---
---
27
36.5
46
27
---
36.5
46
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
--
---
Meander Wavelength (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
49.4
---
50.7
64.9
---
---
89
120.5
152
89
---
120.5
152
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
---
---
---
---
---
---
3.8
3.9
4
---
---
3.5
4
4.5
3.5
---
4
4.5
---
---
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f2
---
---
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
--
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G5c/B5 / B5
E5
E5
E5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
---
---
---
27
Valley length (ft)
1137 / 1545
285
2674
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1146 / 1584
375
3342
3419
Sinuosity (ft)
1.01 / 1.03
1.32
1.25
1.25
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
--
0.0023
---
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.0004 / 0.0021
0.0025
0.002
0.0022
3Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
---
---
---
---
4% of Reach with Eroding Bank
---
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Othe
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
* -Reach was split into 2 segments for the purpose of pre-existing data collection.
1 - The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 -For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification -rue).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 -Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Selma Mill Mitigation Site - Reach B: 2,572 feet
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition**
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
---
---
7.3
8.6
9.2
9.4
1.2
3
---
---
10.9
---
---
---
---
10.0
---
9.2
10.3
10.3
11.7
0.8
7.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
8.0
11.7
13.2
14.0
3.3
3
---
---
50.0
---
---
---
---
>50
---
49.8
51.0
50.3
56.0
2.2
7.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
---
---
---
0.9
1.1
1.2
1.2
0.2
3
---
---
1.0
---
---
---
---
0.9
---
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.1
7.0
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.1
1.5
1.7
1.8
0.4
3
---
---
1.7
---
---
---
---
1.3
---
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.6
0.2
7.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
--
--
---
8.7
9.6
18.7
1 11.4
1 1.6
1 3
11.0
9.4
---
6.6
18.1
18.2
9.7
1.2
7.0
Width/Depth Ratio
6.2
8.0
7.8
9.9
1.9
3
11.9
10.7
11.8
13.4
12.9
15.4
1.5
7.0
Ratio
EntrenEHeh
1.1
1.3
1.4
1.5
0.2
3
>2.2
>2.2
4.3
5.0
5.0
5.5
0.4
7.0
'Bank Rati
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
7.0
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
4
---
11.5
19.9
---
---
8
18.5
29
4.0
15.8
14.7
41.1
9.9
50
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
-0.01354
0.00909
0.00443
0.04809
0.01066
50
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
6.9
---
17.1
21.6
---
---
5
14.5
24
4.7
17.5
15.7
35.6
6.3
43
Pool Max depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.6
1.7
1.8
2.8
0.7
40
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
40.3
---
63.1
109.8
---
---
43
91
139
14.4
60.7
51.8
119.1
26.7
42
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
41.2
---
42.3
43.5
---
---
26
36.5
47
26
---
36.5
47
---
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
13.1
---
18.4
24.6
---
---
19
27.5
36
19
---
27.5
36
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Meander Wavelength (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
49.4
---
50.7
64.9
---
---
70
90.5
111
70
---
90.5
111
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
---
---
---
---
---
---
3.8
3.9
4
---
---
2.6
3.7
4.7
2.6
---
3.65
4.7
---
---
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f2
---
---
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
--
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G5
E5
E5
E5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
---
---
---
15
Valley length (ft)
1392 / 352 / 394
285
2204
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1414 / 382 / 405
375
2619
2695
Sinuosity (ft)
1.02 / 1.09 / 1.03
1.32
1.19
1.19
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
--
0.0023
---
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.0036 / 0.0030 / 0.003
0.0025
0.003
0.0045
3Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
---
---
---
---
4% of Reach with Eroding Bank
---
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Othe
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
** -Reach was split into 3 segments for the purpose of pre-existing data collection.
1 - The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 -For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification -rue).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 -Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 9. Cross Section Morphology Data Table
Selma Mill - Reach A (3,324 feet)
Cross Section 1 (Shallow)
Cross Section 2 (Pool)
Cross Section 3 (Shallow)
Cross Section 4 (Pool)
Cross Section 5 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
161.8
161.8
162.0
161.7
161.5
161.4
160.1
160.2
160.5
160.0
160.1
160.2
158.8
158.7
158.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.2
13.1
13.7
14.3
12.7
11.5
12.1
17.1
9.3
13.2
20.9
19.9
12.0
11.7
12.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50.2
>50.2
>50.2
>50.1
>50.0
>50.0
>50
>50.0
>50
>49.8
>49.9
>49.9
>50
>50.3
>50.3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.7
1.9
0.9
0.6
1.1
1.4
0.9
0.9
1.3
1.3
1.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.8
1.8
1.9
2.9
3.2
3.1
1.4
1.4
1.7
2.8
2.9
2.7
2.1
2.0
2.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.8
1.8
1.8
2.9
3.4
2.5
1.4
160.1
1.3
2.8
2.8
2.4
2.1
2.2
2.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
13.1
13.1
13.1
21.5
21.5
21.5
10.6
10.6
10.6
18.2
18.2
18.2
15.3
15.3
15.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.3
13.2
14.4
9.5
7.5
7.1
13.8
27.7
8.1
9.6
24.0
21.7
9.4
8.9
9.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.8
>3.8
>3.7
N/A
N/A
N/A
>4.1
>2.9
>5.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
0.9
0.8
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
d50 (mm)
Cross Section 6 (Shallow)
Cross Section 7 (Shallow)
Cross Section 8 (Pool)
Cross Section 9 (Shallow)
Cross Section 10 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
158.7
158.8
158.8
158.2
158.3
158.5
158.1
158.2
158.2
157.2
157.3
157.3
156.7
156.7
156.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.4
12.7
12.4
13.2
13.6
14.5
11.3
12.2
11.7
13.9
18.9
14.2
13.4
13.4
13.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50.2
>50.1
>50.1
>52.8
>52.9
>52.9
>48.1
>48.2
>48.2
>50.1
>50.1
>50.1
>50.6
>55.2
>55.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.7
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.2
0.9
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.4
1.4
1.3
2.5
2.9
2.6
2.0
1.9
1.9
2.4
2.5
2.4
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.4
1.4
1.2
2.5
3.0
2.7
2.0
1.8
1.7
2.4
2.6
2.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
12.8
12.8
12.8
10.5
10.5
10.5
16.5
16.5
16.5
16.3
16.3
16.3
16.7
16.7
16.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.0
12.6
12.0
16.5
17.6
19.6
7.7
9.0
8.3
11.8
22.0
12.5
10.8
10.7
10.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.8
>3.9
>4.0
>4.0
>3.9
>3.6
N/A
N/A
N/A
>3.6
>2.6
>3.5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
0.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
d50 mm
Cross
Section
11 (Pool)
Cross
Section
12
(Shallow)
Cross
Section
13 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
155.6
155.6
155.8
155.9
155.9
156.2
155.4
155.5
155.3
Bankfull Width ft
13.0
14.2
15.4
13.3
13.9
13.7
13.4
14.0
13.6
Floodprone Width ft
>50.1
>50.1
>50.1
>50
>50.1
>50.1
>50
>50.0
>50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.2
1 1.1
1.0
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.5
1.4
1.4
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.2
1 2.2
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.0
2.7
2.8
2.7
Low Bank Height ft
2.2
2.4
2.1
2.1
2.1
1.8
2.7
2.8
2.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
15.7
15.7
15.7
15.6
15.6
15.6
19.7
19.7
19.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.8
12.8
15.0
11.4
12.4
12.1
9.2
9.9
9.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
>3.7
>3.6
>3.6
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
PT
0.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
d50 mm
* Annual measurements are based on fixed baseline cross sectional area.

Table 9. Cross Section Morphology Data Table
Selma Mill - Reach B (2,572 feet) Reach C (875 Feet)
Cross Section 14 (Pool)
Cross Section 15 (Shallow)
Cross Section 16 (Shallow)
Cross Section 17 (Pool)
Cross Section 18 (Shallow)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
167.9
167.9
168.1
167.8
167.8
167.8
166.9
167.1
167.2
166.7
166.9
166.9
164.9
165.1
165.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.2
17.5
10.3
10.5
15.9
20.0
10.0
13.4
13.2
10.7
13.1
12.0
10.6
12.4
11.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>42.7
>43.4
>43.4
>50.4
>50.4
>50.4
>49.8
>50.1
>50.1
>49.7
>50.0
>50.0
>56
>56.4
>56.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
0.7
1.3
0.8
0.5
0.4
0.8
0.6
0.6
1.2
1.0
1.0
1
0.9
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.0
1.9
2.0
1.6
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.2
1.1
2.2
2.2
2.2
1.5
1.7
1.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.0
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.1
0.9
2.2
1.9
1.9
1.5
1.7
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
13.0
13.0
13.0
8.6
8.6
8.6
8.2
8.2
8.2
12.6
12.6
12.6
9.4
9.4
9.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.4
23.7
8.2
12.9
29.4
19.0
12.3
22.0
21.1
9.0
13.7
21.1
11.8
16.4
14.2
M
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
>4.8
>3.2
>3.9
>5.0
>3.7
1 >3.8
N/A
N/A
N/A
>5.3
>4.5
1 >4.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
0.9
0.8
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
d50 (mm)
T
I -I
I
Cross Section
19 (Pool)
Cross Section 20 (Pool)
Cross Section 21
(Shallow)
Cross Section 22
(Shallow)
Cross Section 23 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
164.9
164.8
164.7
163.7
163.7
163.8
163.9
163.9
163.9
162.6
162.7
162.7
162.0
162.1
162.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.1
9.8
9.6
7.4
8.1
8.8
10.1
11.0
10.6
11.7
14.6
13.7
11.0
12.4
11.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>61.1
>61.1
>61.1
>50.1
>50.1
>50.1
>50.3
>50.2
>50.2
>50.4
>50.2
>50.2
>48
>50.3
>50.3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
1.4
1.4
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.7
0.7
1.1
1.0
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.6
3.4
3.1
1.5
1.7
1.8
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.3
1.2
1.3
2.0
2.4
2.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.6
3.7
3.5
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.0
0.8
1.1
1.3
1.1
1.1
2.0
2.3
2.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
13.5
13.5
13.5
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.6
6.6
6.6
9.7
9.7
9.7
12.5
12.5
12.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.1
7.1
6.8
8.2
9.9
11.6
15.4
18.3
17.0
14.1
22.1
19.3
9.8
12.4
10.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>5.0
>4.6
>4.7
>4.3
>3.4
>3.7
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
LL
1.0
0.8
1.2
1.0
0.9
0.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
d50 mm
Cross Section 24 (Pool)
Cross Section 25 (Shallow)
Cross Section 26 (Shallow)
Cross Section 27 (HWV)
Cross Section 28 (HWV)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
158.4
158.5
158.5
158.4
158.4
158.4
157.8
157.8
157.9
(Headwater Valley Restoration)
No Morphological Parameters were determined for HWV
Reach C
(Headwater Valley Restoration)
No Morphological Parameters were determined for HWV
Reach C
Bankfull Width ft
11.3
12.8
13.4
10.3
10.3
10.5
9.2
10.0
10.5
Floodprone Width ft
>44.4
>44.4
>44.4
>50
>50.1
>50.1
>50.3
>50.3
>50.3
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.0
0.8
0.8
1
1
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.3
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
Low Bank Height ft
1.7
1.8
1.7
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
10.7
10.7
10.7
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.1
7.1
7.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.8
15.4
16.7
15.1
15.3
15.8
11.9
14.0
15.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
>4.8
>4.8
>4.8
>5.5
>5.0
>4.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
0.9
d50 mm
* Annual measurements are based on fixed baseline cross sectional area.

ReachTable 10. Stream Reach Data Summary
Selma Mill -
Dimension and Substrate -Shallow only
Bank -full Width (ft)
Floodprone Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
'Bank -full Max Depth
Low Bank Height
Width/Depth Ratio
Entrenchment
'Bank Height Ratis
Shallow Length
ShallowSlope
Pool Length®m
Pool Maxclepth
Pool Spacing
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Radius of Curvature (ft)
•
®®®®®®
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Width Ratio
AdditionalMeander
Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg length
(ft)
WaterSinuosity
- Slope
Channel ..-
of Reach with Eroding Bankn
Channel2%
Habitat -
Biological Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 10. Stream Reach Data Summary
Selma Mill - Reach B (2,572 feet)
Dimension and Substrate -Shallow only
Bank -full Width (ft)
Floodprone Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
'Bank -full Max Depth
Low Bank Height
Bank -full Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
Width/Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
'Bank Height Ratio
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool LengthPool
Max depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Radius of Curvature (ft)
•
®®®®®®
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Width Ratio
AdditionalMeander
Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg length
(ft)
WaterSinuosity
- Slope
Channel ..-
��-
of Reach with Eroding Bankn
Channel2%
Habitat -
Biological Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Appendix E
Hydrology Data

Table 11. 2019 Rainfall Summary
Month
Average
Normal
Limits
Johnston County
Airport Station
Precipitation
30
Percent
70
Percent
January
4.24
3.18
4.95
2.35
February
3.66
2.46
4.37
4.07
March
4.57
3.38
5.36
3.05
April
3.24
1.93
3.93
5.52
May
4.16
2.83
4.97
2.52
June
4.14
2.63
5.00
6.17
July
5.14
3.37
6.17
11.31
August
4.58
2.97
5.51
1.64
September
4.54
2.15
5.54
5.34
October
3.16
1.75
3.89
---
November
2.95
1.81
3.57
---
December
3.05
1.96
3.67
---
Total
47.43
30.42
56.93
41.97
Table 12. Documentation of Significant Flow Events
kfull umbumber of
Year aNEvents
Maximum Bankfull Height (ft)
Estimated Date of Highest Event
Crest Gauge 1 (Reach A)
M Y12018
12
0.90
9/ 17/2018
MY2 2019
13
2.12
7/ 12/2019
Crest Gauge 2 (Reach B)
MY12018 3
0.35
11/13/2018
Y22019 4
1.75
8/14/2019
iik
Max Consecutive Flow Days
Number MowEvents
Crest Gauge 3 (Reach C - Headwater Valley Restoration)
MYl 2018*
38
12
MY2 2019
120
10
*MY1 data (April 5 - Nov 29, 2018) was updated to incorporate elevation of downstream riffle to calculate stream flow

Crest Gauge Reading Photos
Crest Gauge 1 (Reach A) — Wrack Line
Crest Gauge 2 (Reach B) — 1.75 feet

MY2 2019 Selma Mill Crest Gauge 3 (HWV Reach C)
14
12
10
t
CL
(D
$
L
6
4
2
--
—
.
. J
n Jul n-- 0 n
LIn I
I nnE,
0 I
J F M A M J J A S
Months
Rainfall CG3 Bed — — — — IDS Riffle Elevation