19960782 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19960814

?.J
A--v 19
CRASS -
a K-- V?
6
!LVZRJY V\,
,nest mo
. ?1%.os 1 w.j
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
[D EHNR
January 21, 1997
Wilson County
DWQ Project # 960782
COE #199606536
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. Charles Pittman
City Manager
City of Wilson
P.O. Box 10
Wilson, NC 27893
Dear Mr. Pittman:
You have our approval to place fill material and secondarily drain 3.24 acres of wetlands or waters for the
purpose of improving a channel at Ridge road drainage improvements to Little Hominy S wamp, as you
described in your application dated 20 January 1997. After reviewing your application, we have decided that
this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 2671. This certification allows you to use
Nationwide Permit Number 26 when it is issued by the Corps of Engineers.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as
modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new
application. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory
mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be
valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed
below. Trees shall be planted on ten foot centers in two staggered rows. Tulip poplars and black gums shall
be planted in equal amounts. DWQ shall be notified after the planting is completed. In addition, you should
get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited
to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed
regulations. This approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless
otherwise specified in the General Certification.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions
are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clea n Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Domey at 919-733-1786.
i ly
on Howaz , r. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Mr. John Dotney
Central Files
Ron Sutton; F.T. Green and Associates 960782.1tr
Division of Water Quality - Environmental Sciences Branch
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer - 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper

F.T. GREEN & ASSOCIATES, P.L.L.C.
ENGINEERS / PLANNERS / SURVEYORS
POST OFFICE BOX 609 / 303 NORTH GOLDSBORO STREET ! WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA 27893
TELEPHONE [phone] / FAX [phone]
January 20, 1997
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535

Attention: Mr. John R. Dorney
SUBJECT: WQC Project #960782
Wilson County
Dear Mr. Dorney:
In response to your letter of September 24 1996 and our on
site meeting on October 21, 1996, enclosed are revised plans for
the Ridge Road Drainage Improvements which r lect a change in
project design capacity from a 10-yr storm to 2-yr storm in the
wetlands area and the planting of popular trees within the drainage
easement to replace shade trees eliminated due to the construction.
The change in a 10-yr storm to a 2-yr storm results in a decrease
of the channel's width of 17 feet. We trust that these changes
will meet your approval and you can proceed with issuance of the
401 Permit.
If you should have any questions concerning this matter,
please feel free to call me.
Respectfully
F Znie REEN & AS OCIATES
Ro L. Sutton, P.E.

i
RLS/kta
cc: Charles Pittman
f•E95057/dmwy.2
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
October 31, 1996
Regulatory Branch
5W
AA'' D
6
Action ID No. 199606536 and Nationwide Permit No. 26 (Headwaters
and Isolated Waters)
Mr. Charles Pittman
City Manager
City of Wilson
Post Office Box 10
Wilson, North Carolina 27893
Dear Mr. Pittman:
Reference is made to your application of July 19, 1996, for
Department of the Army (DA) authorization to impact 1.97 acres of
jurisdictional wetlands associated with the channelization of
Little Hominy Swamp between Ridge Road and Forest Hills Road, in
Wilson, Wilson County, North Carolina. The project is located
adjacent to, and above the.headwaters of, Little Hominy Swamp.
Your application was determined to be incomplete as it did not
clearly identify all adverse wetland impacts associated with the
proposed work.
Reference is also made to the site inspection and meeting on
September 18, 1996, between your agents, Mr. Gary Mitchell with
Mitchell and Associates and Mr. Ron Sutton with F.T. Green and
Associates, and Mrs. Jean B. Manuele of my Raleigh Field Office
Staff, to discuss your proposed drainage improvements and their
impacts as described in your application. During that
inspection, we determined that the subject project will have a
primary impact (mechanized landclearing, excavation and filling)
on 1.97 acres of jurisdictional wetlands along the project
corridor and a secondary impact upon 1.27 acres of wetlands
through drainage associated with the project, for a total of 3.24
acres of jurisdictional impacts. We also noted that this is a
segment of a larger project known as the Hominy Swamp Drainage
Project that will extend throughout Wilson along Hominy Swamp and
Printed on ® Recycled Paper

-2-
its unnamed tributaries. Based upon your agents' comments, the
drainage improvements downstream of this portion of the project
(present application) will be restricted to only clearing and
snagging activities which will not require DA authorization;
therefore, we have determined that the portion of the project
included in your July 19, 1996 application can be considered a
complete and separate project.
For the purposes of the Corps of Engineers' Regulatory
Program, Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330.6,
published in the Federal Register on November 22, 1991, lists
nationwide permits. Authorization was provided, pursuant to
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, for discharges of dredged or
fill material into headwaters and isolated waters.
Your proposed drainage improvements, impacting a total of
3.24 acres of jurisdictional waters of the United States, are
authorized by this nationwide permit provided the work is
accomplished in strict accordance with your submitted plans, the
enclosed conditions, and provided you receive a Section 401 water
quality certification from the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (NCDWQ). You should contact Mr. John Dorney, telephone
[phone], regarding water quality certification. This
nationwide permit does not relieve you of the responsibility to
obtain other required State or local approval.
This verification will be valid until the nationwide permit
is modified, reissued or revoked, which will occur prior to
January 21, 1997. It is incumbent upon you to remain informed of
changes to the nationwide permits, which will be announced by
public notice when they occur. If you commence, or are under
contract to commence, this activity before the date the
nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will have twelve
months from the date of the modification or revocation to
complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of
this nationwide permit.
Ye
-3-
Please be advised that any future jurisdictional impacts
associated with the Hominy Swamp Drainage Project will be
considered cumulatively with the acreage of impacts authorized at
this time. As your agents were informed, future requests for
jurisdictional impacts may require compensatory mitigation for
unavoidable wetland losses, or exceed what can be authorized by
nationwide permit and require a DA individual permit.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mrs. Manuele,
Raleigh Field Office, telephone [phone], Extension 24.
Sincerely,
S. Kenneth Jolly
Manager, Raleigh Regulatory
Field Office
Enclosure
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 227626-0535
Mr. Gary Mitchell
Mitchell & Associates, Inc.
128 Harding Street North
Greenville, North Carolina 27858

Streambank Stabilization and Planting Guidelines for Stream Restoration and Relocation
Division of Water Quality, Environmental Sciences Branch
October 1, 1996
Streams and rivers throughout N.C. have been long be en eroded and degraded by increased flow from
urbanization and channelization. With large amounts of impervious surfaces, erosion rates are higher and invasive
vegetation often takes over and disrupts the functions of these aquatic systems. Consequently, there is a great
demand for projects related to stream restoration and relocations. Detailed stream relocation guidance is being
developed by the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) staff. The guidance in this handout will serve as an
interim basis until the WRC guidelines are complete. The DOT stream relocation guidelines which have a similar
purpose are attached.
Streams restoration may occur as a result of compensatory mitigation or for other enhancement purposes.
Degraded streams or rivers in need of restoration may have eroded stream banks, a lack of or poorly vegetated
riparian zones or may be severely incised or downcut below the natural riverbed. Impacted streams may also be full
of sediment. Restored streams have increased habitat resulting in more diverse macrobenthic, fish or wildlife
populations as well as enhanced recreational use. Often invasive non-native vegetation should be removed and
replaced with native vegetation which has been proven to have effective root systems for stabilization.
Streams are often relocated during construction processes. During this process, it is important to minimize
impacts to water quality, wetlands and wildlife habitat. The main goal of relocating stream channels is to match or
improve the original stream to a pre-disturbance configuration. Variables such as width, depth, gradient, substrate
and meanders should be similar or better than the original stream design. The opportunity exists in stream
relocations to improve upon a stream that may have been altered by channelization or development. Meanders in
streams should be duplicated or created (if absent) so that the stream has sinuous channels and pool to riffle
sequences should be established for piedmont and mountain streams. It is important to have a variety of conditions
from fast, shallow riffle areas to deeper, slower pool areas and an assorted load of substrate which is naturally
distributed in flowing streams. Pool to riffle sequences should be spaced at 5 to 7 times the channel width. Pools
are generally two times deeper than riffle areas. When possible, the substrate from the original channel should be
collected and reused at the new site. Sinuosity or windiness is measured as the thalweg distance(deepest part of a
stream such as during low flow conditions) divided by the straight line distance (as a crow would fly) over a stretch
of stream. The new channel should be completely stabilized before water is introduced into the new channel. If the
goal for the new stream is to move material, sinuosity should be decreased A program is available to calculate shear
stress to determine which size particles can be moved depending on velocity, sinuosity and the slope of the stream
bed. After stream reconstruction is complete, the stream channel should be sinuous, the bank should be stable and
the stream should have a decreased sediment load and a matched or increased value of biological diversity and
aesthetics.
Currently there are many different types of bioengineering techniques available for streambank stabilization
whereas in the past, riprap was thought to be the answer to stabilization needs. The widespread use of riprap is
• /.
K
undesirable because it causes an increase in velocity and volume of water to downstream areas, creating erosion,
sedimentation and flooding downstream Riprap also does not provide suitable habitat as does natural rock
substrate. Natural rock has more of the small crevices and a diverse mixture of rock sizes in streams create
variations in flow hence more niches, so macrobenthic diversity is higher when natural substrate is present. There
are also problems with mowing or maintaining the aesthetics of rip rapped banks. During riprapping, trees along
river banks are removed which eliminates shading and increases water temperatures. The loss of organic matter to
streams (leaf litter, logs, branches) is also a negative factor associated with riprapping.
In areas of high flow, such as outside curves of meanders or in severely eroded stretches, riprapping may be
necessary to prevent scour and undercutting of banks. In these situations, Rprap should be extended into the channel
bank toe of the slope for a few feet to bank full height. Bank full is considered to be the highest point that the water
level typically reaches on an average of every 1.2 years. Bank full can sometimes be detected by sand deposits or a
change in vegetation.
Several new bioengineering techniques are available for streambank stabilization and are briefly mentioned
below. These methods in conjunction with native plantings can be used to produce aesthetically pleasing,
biologically diverse streams.
Root wads (along with 6-8 feet of tree trunk) from hardwood trees
have been used by the WRC in various projects for stabilization. Root wads
are installed into the eroding bank and are anchored with rebar or boulders.
By the time the root wads rot out, native vegetation is replaced. Tag alder
and buttonbush are frequently used as plantings among the root wads.
Brush layering consists of laying willow cuttings (several feet in
length) horizontally, with the branch tips toward the stream and rooting
end away from the stream Soil is piled on top of the cuttings and several
more layers are installed. When installed during a dormant period (winter
or fall), growth new growth should be apparent the following spring. Thi
is a good method to use in areas of high water flows.
A -jacks are a new tool which were used in the Rocky Branch
restoration demonstration (NCSU) and were placed in the outside curves
the eroded stream bank. A -jacks are 6-legged concrete structures which
interlock and can be stacked as a pyramid. A -jacks are used in combinatii
with coconut husk fibers which are soaked and compressed and made intc
logs. These logs are used at the toe of the slopes and are placed so that th,
overlap the A -jacks. Plants can be planted directly into these logs and the
will biodegrade in 5-7 years after which plants have stabilized the area.
Used in this manner, A -jacks are much more stable than rip-rap.
Lunkers are another stabilization device which are elongated bench
like structures that are open on 3 sides allowing waters to flow through
them, while also providing fish habitat They can be made of recyclable
material or of oak.
Riprap may be used when necessary to protect the outer toe of
meanders. Rip rap should be placed on the outside curves from the toe to
bank full height Bank full is considered to be the highest point that the
water level typically reaches on a yearly average. Bank full can sometime
be detected by sand deposits or a change in vegetation.

p
m ?. L
i
*.... , 1.
Vegetative plantings
The use of native vegetation is desirable since native species are non-invasive and they reduce velocity, protect
banks from scour and have root systems which create bank support. Vegetation also contributes organic matter and
provides shade to protect aquatic life. Shading helps reduce water temperatures and enables higher levels of
dissolved oxygen to be held in water.
In addition to establishing bank vegetation for shading, plantings should be placed on the erosional side (or
outside curve) of streams where velocity is greatest. Vegetative plantings dissipate erosive forces and hold sediment
in place. Plants most effective for bank stabilization have deep roots, low growth forms, dense branching patterns
and are resilient under pressure such as flooding. It is desirable to have at least a 25 foot width of bank vegetation
where feasible.
When replanting of banks is required, there should initially be 400 trees per acre with a total of 320 after 3
years (80% survival rate). Trees planted should be large enough (several feet in height) to ensure that they wont be
scoured away during adverse weather.
The following is list of desirable plants for streambank stabilization:
Plants Commonly Used for Streambank Stabilization or Bioengineering Techniques
Common name Botanical name Comments
Wood plants
River birch (upper bank) Betula ni ra Grows well on upper bank areas.
Green ash Fraxinus enn lvanica Grows 50 to 60' in height.
Silky dogwood (lower
bank) Coryus amomum Great wetland planting potential - stick in the
ground and it grows.
Hazel-nut Corylus americana Although not a wetland plant, does well in
wetland situations.
Tag alder Alnus serrulata Widely used, low growing.
Pawpaw Asimina triloba Understo shrub - can et u to 15 or 20' tall.
Elderberry Sambucus canadensis Grows easily, dies back eve winter.
Buttonbush Ce halanthus occidentalis Grows well in water, small shrub
Black willow (lower bank) Salix nigra Good at becoming established, will root easily,
good lateral root growth for stabilization.
Beauty berry Callicarpa americana Naturalized species, 3-4' tall Will grow in
moist bank, may be hard to find in nursery.

Herbaceous plants
Duck potato or Arrowhead Sagittaria latifolia or
Sa ittaria s pp. Grows effectively in wetter areas. Good
stabilization potential..
Arrow arum Peltandra vir inica Similar to duck potato.
Pickerel weed Pontederia cordata Can be used in deeper waters and as stream
edge species.
Rose mallow Hibiscus moscheutos Can be used on banks where you don't want
tall vegetation.
Blue flag iris Iris vir inica Show iris flower. May be later divided.
Sedges, Rushes Carex s pp, Juncus s Can withstand some inundation....
* Alnus and Myrica are able to fix Nitrogen atmospherically. High levels of N have been found in Alnus where
leaves of Alnus have had 4 times the nitrogen as those of other deciduous trees.

o al,
Pf F
1776 VtA t?j 0-kV K,
Yl l] J?/?(ISL?(L1?4- C (M?P?Q.i ?'W? (il ???QN(d - jUJ?
L
n
l?
P? z
- r r V! QSiy-r _
S
0
1
S
Sa.
4
4
Z be 4fT

I
i

1?'
,
sr
i ?
4 ?

-
i
S

!>? ?F
State of North Carolina
DePartment of Environment,
Health and Natural Reso
Division of Water Quality urces
Jamesa Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A- Presto n l-b ward, Jr., P. E., Directo r
Ml'• Charles Pittman
Director of Public Works
City of Wilson
P.O. Box 10
Wilson, NC 27893
Project #960782
Wilson County
?EH R
September 24 `
1996
Dear Iblr. Pittmann:
fill The Division Of Water
fill material into 1.97 acres?ty' Water Quali
rechannelization of waters ty Section has reviewed
efforts. B and/or wetlands located -your Plans for
removed by this pro' ased on this review, we have identified minY Swam the discharge of
stream up to 1.27 Ject. These uses are water stora Pin Wilson County Your project must acres be of wetlands. Furth ge, pollutant remaj cant uses which would be for
that p J ermore, ins
denial Of your 401 built as planned ufficient evidence is present well as aquatic life in the
Certification ui waters and/or wetlands Present '
?orul - we are as required by 15A N CAC m our flies to conclude
N.C. Division of Coal 1 requesting (by co CAC 2B.0109. we are
letter) that the U S Until we receive mO vmg toward
ManagementPY of place this Your project on administrative O1Ps of Engineeneeir
Please provide s and/
Planned and that youwith information hold. or the
Specifically can have your
you no practicable alternative to Position that
Similar approval Construct Your channel to c placing fill in these wmust be constructed arry since most n luck we have issued too a'O (2) ear waters an
this desi channels handle y sto
d/or wetlands.o rm
sign, please info this sto t municipalities in the rather than the 10 year st
aquatic life in ire uenc past utilize ?
the to q Y• If In the two year storm d
desi ated ch location structures v, design
gZ* with M reloc s anne is it becomes ri existing concerned
these °?d be threatened by
and narrative that Karen aP Ch about the potential loss of
you can Karen L of MY staff a Pr ed d Please have
review ofyour 401 Certi an supiolY daddress site -1786. Ann Your engineers discuss
Bye°f this information tom ' Please respond ai designs for yOUrp ojec meatation such as ms
, Raleigh, 611and one copy to
thin two weeks of the date of may be helpful our ap
no longer want to NC . If wed o t h i this letter b
s ear Eric fro Reek meek you at the R a1e
Drive gh Regional Office at 3800
919-733-1786 if sending a
yoPutsue u hav Project and x' will consider two weeks, w anY questions. the project as withdra a will assurer that you
?• I can be reached at
Qy
cc: Weigh DWQ Regional Office
Can files office Corps of Engineers
Manuele; Ralei
K n Lynch, Mitch ell aFiel nd oc? E
qcerely
,
Dorne
y
uality Certifica ' Program
960782.nty
4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC ision of Water Quality
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Acpo0535 • 7ele
mployer p one g? g nmental Science
s Branch
50% 733- 178g FAX919-733-,9959
recycled/ 10% post-consumer Paper
83AOldW3 NOU.3V 3AI.LVWHI=I=I / / A11NnJ.8OddO -=03
£SbZ-66£ (6W :XV:l OObZ-66£ (M) :831N30 SNOllVH3dO
99VZ-66£ (6W :Hd M0011681-Z VNI-108V3 H18ON 'NOS-11M `OL X08 •O•d
a9aul6u3 40 / a0109ala seoimeS oilgnd IueIslssy
'3'd `sllM '1 AJUO
Ff/ J&
NOS11M dO AM
`AlaaaoulS
991,Z-66£-(6L6) Ie Ileo a aw anlb eseeld `suol}senb Aue aneq noA 11
}oafoad eqj enul}uoo o} Luem soop Alp eql pue palpnis bulaq aae suolldo jell 6uguls
966L `6Z aagwaoaa of aolad nog( of lugs eq IIIM sjeeu16ue eql woaj aallel y •Malnai aol
Alp eql of }Iwgns pue loefoid aql JOI san11eua911e aaedaid of sum uaaaO •1•d `uew}L!d
selaegO *ivy ql!m bullaaw Aw pue `966L `LZ aagolop uo ells uo bullaaw all aaj}y
AOUJOd aW aea4
AjunoO uosllM
Z81-096# }oa(o,rFd 30M :3a
9E90-939L3 ON `46191ea
PH N9910 Apaaa LOtt,
AIIIenO aa#eM jo UOISIAla
seamosaIj lein)UN pue `WeaH `luawuO.IIAU3 10 JuawjJedaa
wea60ad U011e311I oo Al!leni} joleM
AawOQ 'El U40f 'JA
966L 'CL jeqweoe(]
n,; . ,
S3ON310S 1d1N3WN0'd1 M19
t L t 330
03A13098 Je8ul6u3 40
94110 80WO
MOO-b68LZ
6481 O31"OdHOON) d7 F11L QN
D1i??OJD? 7i?071 ?O? srai 20
1 LL n?
NOSrIIAk aO -Z13
Ord/A1 j0 *y
JIFA*-OP/LSO5633
saivioossv i xasuo • s • 3
'ATTnj4o9ds6g
PTp/uia
•ajgTssod sp uoos sp 90TJJO STgq 4Op4uoa
asp9Td 'uOTg0p3sT4ps anoA 499m qou sa0p 9Tnpatlos sigq 3I
'L66T Aapnaga3 ATapa uT aoT33o anoA 04 p844Tmgns dTa9doad
aq pTnogs pup L66T dapnupr a4pT dq paTTducoo aq TTTM buTxaas
gap noA gpgq UOT4eUUOJuT agg gpgq 199J 9M •uMpapg4TM ODTJJO anoA
04 UOT490TTddp 9X14 anpg 04 gSTM qou S90p PUP SAT409 AaaA sp goaCoad
sTg4 saapTSUOO uosTTM 3O A4To ago 'aag4an3 '9661 'VZ aaquaa4d9S
3o a94gaT noA UT pauTpquoa smO4T snoaamnu agg gUOU19STnpp a9pun
uaxpg anpg pup xaoM pasodoad STgq 04 SanTgpuaagTR TTp 94pnTpn9 04
buTnuTquoo ST UUT3 STg4 4pg4 p9sTnpp aq 9sv9Td •4oaCoad paouaaagaa
anogp agg buTpapb9. uosTTM 30 A4To 9g4 3o upuz44Td s9Tap40
•aK 04 966T 'TT aaquz909Q 90 a9449T anoA go gdTaoaa UT aap aM
:aTS aPOU
Aqunoa uosTTM
Z8L096# gOaCOad DOM ?SOSL'glls
A9uaOG •g ugor 'JH :UOT4u944K
966T '9T a9quza09Q
SC90-9Z9LZ QUTToapO g4aox 'gbT9Tpg
peOH xaaaD AP99 i T 0 V V
goupag saauaTOS Tpgu9UuuoaTnuS
A4TTpno asgpM go UOTSTnTa
saoanosag Tpan4px pup g4TR9H
'gU9UUOaTnuS go quamgapdaa
RUTTOapo g4aOx 3O 94p4S
6811/-6112 (6W XV.3 / 99£9-L£Z (6W 3NOHd3l31
£68LZ VNIIONVO H1HON 'NOSIIM / 133HiS OH09SCIIOS HIHON £0£ I 609 X08 3013301SOd
SHOA31HnS / 9H3NNb7d / S833NION3
•D•a•aa `saidIDossv v NAAUD :LA
3?
u6
State of North Carolina
Department aturalrRe Resources 4 00
Health a
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor EH N
Jonathan B. Howes, Preston Howard, Jr., P E Secretary A. Pres Director
A. Pres
December 11, 1996
Mr. Charles Pittman
City Manager
City of Wilson
P.O. Box 10
Wilson, NC 27893
Dear Mr. Pittman:
WQC Project #960782
Wilson County
On 19 July 1996, you requested a 401 Water Quality Certification from the Division of
Water Quality for your project (Little Morning Swamp rechannelization) located near concerns Wilson in Wilson County. We wrote to you on 24 st on hold ntil those concerns are that we
have regarding the design of the prod placing sever
char addressed. We met on-site on 21 October lAs of todayCwe have not received a regponse to
which could make this project app 23
we will our earlier letter. Unless receive application s and are not interested n,purs ing the
consider that you have withdrawn awn t
project at this time.
Please call me at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions or would like to discuss this
matter.
$o R. Dorney"
W *r Quality Certific 4in Program
cc: Raleigh. DWQ Regional Office
Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Central Files
Gary Mitchell; Mitchell and Associates 960782.clr
Division of Water Quality • Environmental Sciences Branch
- 919-733-1786 * FAX 91
4401 Reedy creek Rd.. Raleigh, Affirmative A 6-053mp yereP 50°/e recycled/ 1o% post-consumer paper 959
An Equal Opportunity r
?y O F W/ZSO
`tea ua of
2 NORTH
Deputy City Manager / Operations
& Public Services
July 19, 1996
960732
CITY OF WILSON
nodh Carolina
INCORPORATED 1849
27894-0010
Wilmington District Engineer
Corps of Engineers
Department of the Army
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Attention: Cesaw - Co - E
Water Quality Planning
North Carolina Department of Environment
Health and Natural Resources
Department of Environmental Management
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 28626-0535
Attention: Mr. John Dorney
SUBJECT: Nationwide Permit 926 Application
U. S. Army Corp of Engineers
Wetland Permit Application
Little Hominy Swamp between.
Ridge Road and Forest Hills Road
City of Wilson
Gentlemen:
AUG 19
Enclosed for your review and approval is the City of Wilson's application for a Nationwide Permit
926 as it relates to a channel improvement and stabilization project along a stretch of Little Hominy
Swamp between Ridge Road and Forest Hills Road within the corporate limits. This project, which
is needed for the public good and protection of the public health and safety, will have a primary
impact on 1.97 acres of wetland and a secondary impact on 1.27 acres.
P.O. BOX 10, WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA 27894-0010 PH: [phone]
OPERATIONS CENTER: [phone] FAX: [phone]
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ( AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER

.Y.
July 19, 1996
Page 2
We trust that you will act favorably upon this request and if you should have any questions or need
additional information, please forward your request to the attention of the following individual:
Ronnie L. Sutton, P. E.
F. T. Green & Associates
Post Office Box 609
Wilson, North Carolina 27893
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Sincerely,
CITY OF WIL
Charles W. Pitman, III
Deputy City Manager/Operations and Public Services
CWPIII.jb
R -
DEM ID ACTION ID:
?:,.ion- id,! Pernuc Requested (Pr o,,idu ;nationwide Pev!ni: i,}: 26
JOINT FORM FOR
NationNNide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
1?'I1-1,,M40TON DISTRICT Ei?'GL TEER WATER QUALITY PLAIN-N` NN(3
CORPS OF ENGINEERS DIVISION OF E.\VIRONNrPNI'AL lviANAGE'4IENT
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMLY NC DEPARTMENT OF EN W[RON?viEN3 7, HEALTH,
P.O. Box 1890 AN-D NATURAL RES OURCE-S
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 P.O. Bor. 29535
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Telephone [phone] ATTN: MR. JOHI DORN MY
Telephone [phone]
O-1NrE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SEN- I TO THE CORPS OF ENGINE pRS.
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF E-NVIRONMEIN"rAL MANAGENMNT.
PLEASE PRINT. -
1. Owners Name: City of Wilson
2. Owners Address: P.O. Box 10, Wilson, N.C. 27893
3. Owners Phone Number (Home): 399-2462 (Work): 399-2462
4, if Applicable_: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address; phone number--.
Charles W. Pittman - Director of Public Works
P.0. Box 10
Wilson, N.C. 27893
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH ivigP). County: Wilson
Nearest Town or City: _ kT; son
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, Forest E,i 11 s Road (SR 1165) abovP
headwaters of Hominy Swamp
6. Nrun ,e of Closest Strearrv'Rivet: rn„tentnPg ?rePk _
'7. P.iver Basin: Neuse
8. Is Lhis project bated in a watershed classified ac Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, ID'S I, or WS N? YES [ J NO (X]
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES (] NO [X]
If yes, explain.
10. Rstirnated total number of acres of waters of t-I-:e ,?.S., including wetlands, located on project site:
5.0{ Acres
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project.
Filled: 0.17
Drained: N
Flooded: 0.80
Excavated: 1.0
Total Impacted: 1.97

i;es_:irrion of pro:)o"ed WOr% (Attach PLA„S-8 1/2' X I I" drau-ings only): _Re-channelization of
Little Hominy Canal - See plans.
i 3. Purpose of proposed work: To reduce flooding and storm water damage to property. Also,
reduce safety concerns and provide better water flows and to insure protection o
pu is bealEh and-safety.
-
14. Sate reasons why the applicant believes tat his activity must be earned out in wetlands. Also, note measures
taken to minimize wetland impacts. See-below
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USRV S) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
(1?I1?iFS) regarding the presence- or any Federally listed or proposed for Listing endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat in the permit are-a- that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? YES [ Xj NO i ]
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS RIND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWAR-DED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done su° ='4'ES [ g] NO [
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wet and delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and rakes on the property, plans included
F. If available-, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project. N/A
C: if delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line. plans included .
D. If a stormwater managetnert plan is required for ti-ss project, attach copy, N/A
F. What is lard use of surrounding properry? Single Family Residential
F If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? munici al sewer
w
Owner's Signature
bate
14. Due to existing topography, there are no other practical alternatives but to
carry out the re-channelization in wetland areas. Rock check dams will be
placed in accordance with plans; seeding and mulching will take place within
30 days of land disturbance; and silt fences will also be utilized.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Date: 1 I I ??q
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. 9. oY>- Lkw' a?s FH-
2. b,) 10. net-is
3. Ger ! " t..( ri'1yu ry-) ?'C 11. i"?Jw1"i /CjJ c (1 ; C?Q 1
G? l-
6-2)r
C-1
12. ?Vf'?C7?Crf

E.f trUY?a AkYlt 16. ?? r 7it1:?.
Percent of Dominant Species that are 08L, FACW or FAC
i
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
=
I i Other _
-tatureted in Upper 12 Inches
I
Recorded Data Available L-Water Marks
II =iDrift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
j Field Observations: / )rainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water- /Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
--liqater-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (_0 (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
1-T
lj) l?aa?
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase}.
Drainage. Class: ?dv
? F
Taxonomy (Subgroup): ow I
S C Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mortis Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) jMunsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc:
2 end I o?-ti-7
Carp,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosoi Concretions
_
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ SulfidIc Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquio Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Usted on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: ?'
WETLAND DETERMINATION
1 Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ss No (Circle) ;Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes o
I? Hydric Soils Present? Yes N-01) Is this Sem;,iir,g Point Within a Y etiand? Yes h,o
I ?
Remarks:

pproved by nQ SAC 2/92
e
VEGETATION
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Community ID: l r
Transect ID:
Plnt m• l? C
Dominant Plant Species // ff

2.{nip Stratum Indidiicca?too'r'
i-r4co Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
9. J?1 .X TtZC,"?-
10.G0.r' (rrtisC..
3. bruk, f4C 11. L4 ?ru
4. Yn 1-,---, r 12. 1, ?1 e-ns

6. (7i is Qjj_ LCflyt Cam. T_ 14.

8. D-?rQ-S r- E6YIC?rY I mil' "rte V 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are DEL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-).' N c( o
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
II _ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_ Other
k /No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators: I'
Primary Indicators: I?
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift,Unes I
Sediment Deposits
Fold Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondrry Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: i (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
!
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Date
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: I F e

snll <11
(_?7v 01=
Map Unit Name +
Car
r
(Series and Phase): r%?J _
Drainage Class:
} U V?
`
)bj
a
l? { ^t Feld
?

Taxonomy (Subgroup): Ma p
d
Confirm firm Mapped Type? es No
V
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Cinches Horizon (Munsall Moist) (Munse(l Moist) Abundance /Contrast Structure, etc.
n
l ?` ` I O ? ?2 O ? i pa vY-?
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
^
Sulfdic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
774quic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
?Aoducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_1,--?1eyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
} HydroPhric Vegetation Present? Ye No (Circle) ;Circle}
li Wetland Hydrology Present? es No _
Hydric Soils Present? es No Is this Sampling Point Within e, Wetland? i Yes !'o
Remarks:
pproved by HQUSACE 2
Wi;son Az
IRPORT// - ?"

Park
. i'
t•
151:
? o l
? i
,:163
i -
r,
Pine
1 ;•? •' ?L/s4 •
I
'32 57'30"
MN,I
?r GN
107 M!LS°Ij 1°43'
rT 31 MILS
D AND -974 MAGNETIC NORTH
,ATION AT =EN; ER OF SHEET
S Covenant
Ch

'33 '3, (L?ILSON 1:62500) - _ - 130 55'
5455111 7VC.. 4'1 fl'i SCALE 1:24000
2 J i MILE
1S/".r^ 0 1000 3000 4000 50'- 6000 7000 FEET
1 .5 0 KILOMETER
CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929
THIS MAP COMPLIES WITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS
FOR SALE BY U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, RESTON. VIRGINIA 22092
A FOLDER DESCRIBING TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS AND SYMBOLS IS AVAILABLE ON REQUEST
?e' 41 ;
e
, ls, u
- o
Ce1
i
./`\146
.137
? /r
131
A
•
T.B.M. #1
ELEV. 124.33
LEGEND
c? POINT
0 NEW IRON PIPE
0 EXISTING IRON PIPE
EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE
t:> EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE
EXISTING EDGE-OF-WOODS
N ?o ! -
-4
,
I ? I
i 70
0
60' R W
T.B.M. #1
RAILROAD SPIKE IN POWER POLE
NEAR FOREST HILLS ROAD.
ELEVATION 124.33
T.B.M. #2
RAILROAD SPIKE IN 18" OAK.
ELEVATION 128.80
T.B.M. #3
RAILROAD SPIKE IN 30" OAK.
ELEVATION 126.56

25 ,? Li iv
gory ?/ / •\
PROPOSED 75' \
\ PERMANENT EASEMENT \
WOODS ,
45 TYPICAL STONE LINED
.. CHANNEL WITH 1.00 FT.
:;.::. > \p\ THICK CLASS A STONE
: ooh - 75 S.Y.
...... ??
.....;;....... h% .. \
?, .
?...
....: ::..:...::.. ELEV.
o
y„ / \
b-A
:.... ,7 ..::........... ::::.
:..\i::•:
THORPSHIRE FARMS ::::- _?.::*?:
~ ^X
P.B. 11, P. 29 \
P.O. BOX 7058,
WILSON, NC 27893
)EN 1 `> 20 ".?
JOHNNY THOMAS BLACKWELL and
wife SUZANNE G. BLACKWELL
D.B. 1147, P. 823
2103 CANAL DR.
,
3
r

Z
B.M. #2
_EV. 128.80
STONE LINE GRADE
1.00 TRANSITIFTO. CLASS "A"
o STONE - 180 S.Y.
o
..
RICHARD T. SMITH,
WILL CARR SMITH, &
SARA TOMLINSON SMITH
D.B. 1286, P. 877
P.O. BOX 7058

WETLANDS BOUNDARY
ROCK CHECK
v ^°j DAM
J11
ROBERT E. TREADWELL and
wife JAYNE W. TREADWELL D.B. 1425, P. 301
2107 CANAL DR.
O\\
wife MARTHA L.
D.B. 1423, P
2111 CANAL
MARK A. THURSTON and
wife JUDITH A. THURSTON
THURSTON
D.B. 1461, P. 593
2109 CANAL DR.
r
PLACE 4 S.Y. CLASS "A"
STONE AROUND END OF /
PIPE ON CHANNEL SLOPE JNap
T.B.M. #3 p/?oS o
ELEV. 126.56 /
k ::::.:
A- .r ............ ........ .........
::::::: • :::::.. ...::::::.::•:.rim .... ......
?'
......... ...::....
......... ......
O .f :::::::::.::::.:._
?. :::::::::::i.i::.'..::;::: :•: :: :::-?".;:° DR. ROBE
t? :.. °:- .r... .... .... :...::.::.:
::.::•::::::;•:::•::::..:':`' ..::: •, ::.... =. ::::: ' w D.B. 106f
:::::...:::..:.:::.:::.:::• E. LEO GREEN, JR.
a r::.::•::•:::; •.;::•.° ..' . cP
o::;:: :::::::.:::::::;::;.;.:: :::.•-::':_::: :-.'•:::.:..:::::.:..::; FE VIRGINIA G. GREEN 2205 CI
;rr! ................ D.B. 1128, P. 59
.? .......... . . ... . . .
,,..... :...::.:....:.?.:.... ................? ......
....: 2201 CANAL DR.
.....

GARY E. PROFFITT and
wife MARTHA L. PROFFITT
D.B. 1423, P. 271
2111 CANAL DR.
L. LEE ASKEW and
wife DENISE W. ASKEW
D.B. 1417, P. 542
2117 CANAL DR.
..i.. _ .._._...__.-.._ __. ._j...._
BOUNDARY NOTE: ALL CONSTRUCT
CITY OF WILSON
UTILITIES SHOWI`
APPROXIMATELY.
RESPONSIBLE Fc
OF ALL EXISTIN(
WHETHER SHOW
CONTRACTOR TC
REMOVAL AND F
UTILITIES, WALL`
CONTRACTOR.
EROSION CONTF
SEEDING AND k
WITHIN 30 DAYS
ACTIVITIES NOT
I
___4 --

ELEVATION 128.15) EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE
SPIKE IN 18" GUM. t -,EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE
ELEVATION 128.62
•/?,? Oc? BOUNDARY
T.B.M. #4
---"?ELEV. 124.83
PROPOSED 75'
PERMANENT EASEMENT
15"
45'
WETLANDS BOUNDARY (TYP) !
.4 THE >o° 6° onx
1 ?-L
D24" GUM
?- • • _? • _ ` ?J 36" GIfM
19.. GUM
BOUNDARY ' ^ J?' ?CY N
T.B.M. #4
CITY OF WILSON ELM
ELEV. 124.83 D.B. 1202, P. 775 ?s':•?fM
i oP>
D 75' I P.O. Box 10
NT EASEMENT
45
: ----
Jr :Et:::{:::.
n Li
IDARY (TYP) /.. o :::..,:.:::•- i
.................... -..-..........-....-
................... .....--...-..... .........--..
_....... ................... ............. ....
I+;
.......
............ .
....................
- i
• .....:. :: r
......... ROC ` f
f
a:.
S
::..
G
30
RICHARD T. SMITH 1
D.B. 1027, P. 419
2303 CANAL DR. \
nd
IITE
=? G
WILLIAM COLE ANDREWS and
wife REBECCA ALTMAN ANDREW:
D.B. 1540, P. 438
2305 CANAL DR.
EXTEND 4" & 6" PVC PIPES
TO PROPOSED CHANNEL AND
LINE EAST SIDE OF CHANNEL
FROM STA. 19+00 TO STA.
20+00 WITH CLASS "A" STONE
- ------------------------------------
i

THEODORE S. -XANIUKA and
CIT1 OF WILSON \ ryti / wife MAUREEN P. KANIUKA
i D.B. 1100, P. 23 D.B. 1531, P. 110
P.O. BOA, 10 2522 BUCKINGHAM ROAD,
6- Guts
...ooh PROPOSED 50'
:::':.;.:::: :.::•;:.:: _': ;::.= :: :: x PERMANENT EASEMENT / .
_:........:.: C /
.......:............ ....... ......... .
::.::..::.-:::: 30
JACOB
:.::::::: "':::;:::;• D.B. 1386
::::;:::•:: o: ' ='...:: ?, / 2524 BUCKI!
:::..' ... / K .....'. 0" CUM Y.
::.. s.?.° ° ` \ ?,? e Jam, o•
'0 1
20' ... ::..: 's) x
12" MLLOV,'
T.B.M. #5
28. 5 3.5 WIRE
ELEV. I n G FENCE i?tiGSfr
IT TRANSITION FROM
STA. 22+80.00 `
% ......`
i and
c? j ! J ....... •.
IDREWS i TO STA. 23+00.00
OD - I
r o-POGE
YrGO=• -v .j cV ? ?,1.
JAMES H. TETTERTON and r
wife LUCINDA H. TETTERTON
D.B. 1498, P. 407 r JOHN N. HACKNEY, III
2403 CANAL DR. D.B. 1436, P. 668
' 2405 CANAL DR.
/ GARY A. STURN
/ wife NANCY C-
D.B. 1528, F
2407 CANAL

I

EROSI
SEEDI
Milt
" OB WYNN T.B.M. #6 ACTH!
1386, P. 752 ?
UCKINGHAM RD. 1 ELEV. 124.62 SILT. I
/ i OR A
/ HARVEY JOSEPH JONES / OBSE
& WIFE MELINDA C. JONES
D.B. 1440, P. 830 JOHN M. BAJEK and SILT
0 2526 BUCKINGHAM RD. wife MARY C. BAJEK
a / D.B. 1332, P. 39
/ 2528 BUCKINGHAM DR.
5
AQILAH TAUB
D.B. 1546, P. 827 /
94" GUM 4 WRE + 2528 BUCKINGHAM DR.
.` .. ?O= WILLIAM D. C
wife THEDA
....... .:.. ,c D.B. 1107.
;:•:::-A-
2532 BUCKING .4p y-
cv Y-
ir3
N
t. o ?.. ' • :.:. 0)
STURNER and
^Y C. STURNER µ r? r
528, .
CANAL DR.17 PAUL L. WALTERS, III and wife
CAROL STOCKDALE WALTERS
/ D.B. 12432, P. 35 z
RICHARD EARLY REEVES and -•`
2409 CANAL DR. . /wife CANDANCE GOOCH REEVES -_j
D.B. 1210, P. 654
/ 2411 CANAL DR. / V
WILLIE NATHANIEL DIXON
D.B. 1403 P. 233
1 2507 CANAL DR.
VA
it
L
BUCKINGHAM DRIV E VALVE
=v
Q
4
-- --- ---
i !NV- 13
.8_
127.44
GAS
VALVE I
I
?? GAS

I I VALVE
SMAUEL CASWELL
( LATHAM, JR.

J( I
D.B. 1548, P. 848 I
I J. THOMAS TAYLOR &
WILLIAM D. CADY and I I !
i I 2600
BUCKINGHAM WIFE OPHELIA M. TAYLOR

O Wife THEDA L. CADY
D
B
11 X
RD. D.B. 1229, P. 362

O .
.
07, 728
2532 BUCKINGHAM dr w +
I ' f (

' 2602 BUCKINGHAM DR.
. I
'! REPLACE 60 LF OF

O I
I
I CURB & GUTTER ON
T.B.M. #7 ii EACH SIDE STONE
BA
SE
+ ELEV. 131.11 & ASPHALT PAVING
O Z, it CLASS "A" STONE

G
a 1.00 FT. THICK
< J

c, o ,
., ? ? w ?

(I 1 Q

r 220 S.Y.
i
?

(n .. ,_
SARN
?
? 4G
//(4` ? j
3c..x

A ?
I CONC
PAD
1? ??
VtA
_
/
"
-/
_T
uj
?
Lu

U
I
`
W _ -x Q? Cc a:
Sgt 1
a P, cL Lt
i
.C 2-PROPOSED

`' !
I CALVIN BRUCE ROSE &
I PROPOSED BLIND ' WIFE, DOLORES P. ROSE ALLEN M. JONES &

JUNCTION BOX w !
W''
°i ``' D.B. 1065, P. 784 I WIFE, CYNTHIA J. JONES

I x
I
2601 CANAL DR. D.B. 1180, P. 332
O 2603 CANAL DR. I
I
EDWARD R. HARDISON & i O 2-N.C.D.O.T. NO. 838
22
WIFE, MARGUERITE B. HARDISO of I .
REINFORCED CONCRETE END-
I D.B. 1066, P. 123
2509 CANAL DR
uj WALLS W/ 60 LF TRIPL

" E
. 54
0 RCP's 90' SKEW

------------

CANAL DRIVE

cyl
b;
1
i
i
i
,Ibjj jb

saTT,1 jEZqUaO
a3T330 TeuOT20g
•pagsenbaa (gOedwT AaPpuooes) aaOe LZ'T auq pup (goEduzT AaewTad)
-'Ole L6-T TEgO4 auq ueug SSOT eq TTTM agrS STug ge sgoedwT Tengop
euq sanaTTaq queOTTdde ails •sagEwTgsa ATuo axe saaOe LZ-T 30
OEdwT AaepuoOas pagewTgsa auq pup saaOe L6-T 3o goedwT pagewTgsa
aewTad auq geug pagou eq pTnous gI •(saouegangsTp pageTOosse
up) Tenowaa aaag azTwTUTw og pagngTgsuT eq pTnous sdags anTSSaabbV
Tenowaa aaaq awOS og gOaCgns eq TTTM (U0TgdTaOS8p s,queOTTdde
uq aad se) eaae sTUy •aTgTSSOd se aTggTT se pegangsTp eq pTnous
dew uo qubTTUbTu MOTTaA UT UMOuS 'S3-d0V LZ-T -xoadde) abeaaoe
oudwT Aaepuooes ails (Z •su0TgTpu0O TeuOTgTppe 'AaeSSaOau 3T 'PUP
OTgebTgTw aaTnbaa pTnous uTseq abeuTeap dweMS AuTwoH OTggTq auq
TggTM TTT3 JO; sgsanbaa TeuoTgTppe AUV (T :silo. TpuoO buTM0TT03
t.[g ugTM penssT eq. ITwaad sTUg geuq UOTUTdo s,OgH aug ST qI
ssNHr?u?io?
MUG QNOO/HaSSI anSSI : (auO OTDJTO) NOIJ.VG IHLMOoUX
LZNVOI'IddFT HZIA QHSSfloSIQ NHHU SNOIZIQNOO/S2[ONF7HO ZoHFOXcl HAVH
NO LQHHDVJ.Id IHHHS ONIJ.VX QNTIZHM SI
?/A : L03NI Huow 1.SHfiba'a floA GIG V, : HZI$ NOIZFIOIZIW
' HdAS NOIZS'OIZILd N/A LNOIZVOI.Liw
N/D: Z IIA Ag (lHILDVCI II 2IHZvM 5 5 : (#)H2IOOS 'IM
Nq): LZSH Hod 'IM 4?- ' QHZSHflbax 'IM
-fl-)9 : HdAS 'IM NIT : L1,oviwi 'IM
0 : SsvIO Y1 Wins
8 - 9 8 - L z :ON XHQNI ul S L 0 M:0 :# NI svq SRS QNV UHAI, ?
-HoIddo mu
MAT/90 : VG0 NH3 HIVG ddv : VQO woud Goa
: # LOG :# HOD .
9 ZMN : HdA1, IiwaHd OIIVZ IaHNNVHD WVHUIS = HdAS ZoHf Oad
dwvAs MIWOH Hglliq-NOS'IIM do AZIo HwN ZNvoI'Iddv
NOS'IIM :AZNIIOo z8L0000 :ON liwaHd 96 ?UK ZIMUJ
(H'IgvoI`Iddv ZON aoi v/N asa) QH2IHMsmv HS isaw waii HovH:,:**
SNOIIVGNHIgwooau QNH IxOdHa .3dvis QNvglaM :109ranS
HZ`dQ HON` aq SHONHI0S gVINHWNOXIANH
' Adas aM Aamao(l NHOF :01
??Iv?:-SHKVN,ZNI2Id 14IIQNVaOw4ln
d9o
Project name `?
County d'
N ame of evaluator.
SiR'aw1 (?Q-GHaMlI?2f1f 'd'\ Nearest road
,tland area - 3• a4 acres Wetland wid
Date
??4/ Ca?o?? p?.
s O eet
20 `? ?n.
b la
Wetland type (select one)*
Bottomland ardwood forest
H
d C3 pine savanna ?. Bog forest 3"
ea
water f r est ? Freshwater marsh ? Bog/fen
? Swamp fores ? Estuarine fringe forest ? Se
? Wet flat
? Ephemeral wetland
? Other
? Pocosin ? Carolina Bay
"The ratin system- cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels s
" -
weight ;
_ Water storage x 4.00 = %<<?:

=- Bank/S

oreline stabilization

x 4.00 = ,.:..
,,;;..:......:.,,
%''":I? ,
Wetland Score
;
;
' -
Pollutan
t removal
? x 5.00 = ,;; :;
?' >:y?;:.;»>... -
`
' Wildlife habitat _ _ -'%`/ `?'..` '

Aquatic life value _? x 4.00 = ;;? ?. _,.
f,,,'......
Recreation/Education x 1.00 = ?:>: ?.:?, ;
* Add 1 point if jn sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1 /2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius ;
',,..,..,i,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,i,,,i,,,,,,i,,,,i,,,,,i,,,,,,,,,,,,,f,if,i?ii„i,,,,,iiiii,iiii,,,i,,,,,,iii„i,,,,,,,,,,,i,,,,,,,,,,.,.,,/,
960782
OF `sot
r1JG 1 4 1996
CITY OF WILSON
o •. u„ snow north Carolina
2 vORTH GPI INCORPORATED 1849
27894-0010
Deputy City Manager/ Operations
& Public Services
July 19, X1996
Wilmington District Engineer
Corps of Engineers
Department of the Army
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Attention: Cesaw - Co - E
Water Quality Planning
North C?rolina Department of Environment
Health and Natural Resources
Department of Environmental Management
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, ?orth Carolina 28626-05.35
Attentio Mr. John Dorney
Nationwide Permit 926 Application
U.S. Army Corp of Engineers
Wetland Permit Application
Little Hominy Swamp between
Ridge Road and Forest Hills Road
City of Wilson
Enclosed 'or your review and approval is the City of Wilson's application for a Nationwide Permit
#26 as it relates to a channel improvement and stabilization project along a stretch of Little Hominy
Swamp b tween Ridge Road and Forest Hills Road within the corporate limits. This project, which
is need er for the public good and protection of the public health and safety, will have a primary
impact 04 1.97 acres of wetland and a secondary impact on 1.27 acres.
P.O. BOX 10, WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA 27894-0010 PH: [phone]
OPERATIONS CENTER: [phone] FAX: [phone]
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
14
V
i
July 19, 1996
Page 2
We trust that you will act favorably upon this request and if you should have any questions or need
additional information, please forward your request to the attention of the following individual:
Ronnie L. Sutton, P. E.
F. T. Green & Associates
Post Office Box 609
Wilson, North Carolina 27893
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Sincerely,
CITY OF WILS
Charles W. Pitman, III
Deputy City Manager/Operations and Public Sri
CWPIII.jb
Vv ?
0? - 4

i
r
DEM tD ,? __ ACTION ID:
Na;ion,ide Perm[ Requested (Provide Nationwide pern-ii,, 9): 26
JOINT FORM FOR
Natiomi ide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
'nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
u'?L'v-.V-GTON DISTRICT EiNGL 1EER WATER QUALITY PLAINT'?'INO --
CORPS OF ENGINEERS DIVISION OF ENVIROINYMI 7AL lvIANAGEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMEN'T', HEALTH,
P.O. Box 1890 AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 P.O. Bor. 29535
ATTN: CESAAl-CO-E Raleigh, INC 27626-0535
Telephone [phone] ATM MIR..IOMNI DORNTEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF ENO MI RS.
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENTT.
PLEASE PRIN'T'.
1. Owners Name: City of Wilson -
2. Owners Address: P.O. Box 10, Wilson, N.C. 27893
3. Owners Phone Number (Home): 399-2462 (Work): 399-2462
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone numb,-:
Charles W. Pittman - Director of Public Works
P. 0. Box 10
Wilson, N.C. 27893
5. Location of work (MLTST ATTACH NLAP). County: Wilson
Nearest Town or City: W; i gnn
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, Fare 11 s R
headwaters of Hominy Swamp
6. Name of Closest Stream/R-vei: rCj„ten,tnea Cr'°PL
7. River Basin: Neuse
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified ?%s Trout, SA, HQW, ORW WS T, or WS II? YES [ j NO [X}
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property" YES [ ) NO [X}
If yes, explain. __ N/A
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of dk:c U.S., including ",etlands, located on project site:
5.0± Acres (-3 -0)
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
Filled: 0.17
Drained: N/A
Flooded: 0.80
Excavated; 1.0 -
Total Impacted: 1.97

1 U_scrirtion of pro^•oSecd %vork (.Attach PL,_,'S-8 1;2.. X 11" dra%vings only): Re-channelization of
-
Little Hominy Canal - See plans. _ -
13. Purpose of proposed work: To reduce flooding and storm water damage to property. Also,
reduce safety concerns and provide better water flows. and to insure protection o
pu is alth an sa e y. _
14. State reasons why the applicant believest1?at ibis activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also, note measures
taken to minimize wetland impacts. See Dei ow
1 S. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USRV S) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed orproposed for listing endangered or threatened species or critical
h abitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? YES [ X) 1?T0 r
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
properties in the perrnit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done su? 4'ES (X1 NO[
]
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DElvi:
A. Wotland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property. plans included
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project. N/A
C: If delineation was performed b a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line. plans included .
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for &ds project, attach copy. N/A
E. What is land use of surrounding property? `_ Single Family Residential
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? municipal sewer
14. Due to existing topography, there are no other practical alternatives but to
carry out the re-channelization in wetland areas. Rock check dams will be
placed in accordance with plans; seeding and mulching will take place within
30 days of land disturbance; and silt fences will also be utilized.
,_JW11UJ a 0LruuLu1c uate
DATA FORM Ius0
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION QTY ot=
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: ,')4 Card -Lr. - L )0 ? Date: 1_(?
Applicant/Owner: County:' (? p??1
Investigator: M E _+z:,1-1,f6 State: tom) <
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? is No
C Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)?
Yes ;([N) Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes <20) Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. LI?"a'Oc Pf ldz?t?n
E7A
9. Co, I.Ix?Y? u v?
l S
2. 10. S I YIP?i

4.
?e'U3S ?r
'tf?? 110
r w . 12. (3 1'? b
>>
?
'
5.U'UPr?J
S' 1'??C.t,c?1?1?II
? 13.' i y k"Ci ?) ?7?2? {- ?1
`
I
6.1=1G??i1C7(a 14.
7. V; /`Gl l1 -
8 f`IYLaY?Ic? ?'kQ?,r,; < 1 16.x: r l r r? U_
a .
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC ?o
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
-taturated in Upper 12 Inches
L,-Water Marks
)Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Feld Observations: _?brainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) ',`Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
-Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (_0 (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
1 _ FAC•Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
c I-TV b x::?
Ij ) u;'c-a.S
Map Unit Name,.
(Series and Phase)
Drainage-Class: el
ji) di Taxonomy (Subgroup): J ?-?S Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon fMunsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast. Structure. etc:
2 end i o?-n
_L0 12 I pDr?)
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histio Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_Su(fidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquio Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gieyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
A(
Hydrophydc Vegetation Present? as No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present?o
Hydric Soils Present? Yes "No Is this Sampling Point Within a Weiland? Yes No
Remarks:
Proved v
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Prolect/Site: So (.ar>??c _IA34 F-r -4 9- 1l5'gd . Date: _l 1 S
Applicant/Owner: 3:7. ree ?'1 County: 1; (So
Investigator: 1 IAA -. State: Nc-
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Des No Community ID:
Is the. site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes & Plot ID:
(if needed, explain on reverse.) -
VEGETATION .
Dominant Plant Species
1Za a, Ls Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
9. E: X
s. P6-r- rbr-u? _ FAG 11.E-I' l r
a. Y-n 12. , I' o er se
c1
5. r 1s.
I -
l
6. )Frl, LS Qt lt?rl4o? '' 11
? 7k V 14.

s. t ?C y 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-). Nil c
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Streem, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
Other
V No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Feld Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Second ry Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Date
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: ?v A77 77777
f

wrL-SDA
5
n

SOILS
C.) ? Y oi- ?i?-So?J
Map Unit Name
S
i it
it
(
er
es and Phase): Val
Drainage Class:
• U Vt?
T Feld
m
!J-air} 5
axonomy (Subgroup): ) nfirm Ma fir
Mapped Mapped
Co
Type? es No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Cinches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance /Contrast Structure, etc.

"f 51 ` C)
10 i oa??,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor
!-4
uic Moisture Re
ime _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Li
d
L
l
q
g ste
_
on
oca
Hydric Soils List
Ll F aducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
71--P1eyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
4
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? <Ye No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland HydroloV Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? es No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? (aes No
Remarks:
Nark I,
u
. I
MRPC
-163
r> tl
11
\ jl II
i \\ ?Cerr
J i \\i
f Golf
Course'
•//-1i46
ti 22.2 '
? I
??
.137
C
vv'.
-- --- Peace
Ch
-Tee I •?
II
r? 1`I
232 57'30"
AN
GIN
1
E'
107 MILS 1.43'
31 MILS
10 AND 1974 MAGNETIC NORTH
4ATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
I
Covenant
p Ch
i
233 2341 (WILSON 1:62 500) I cr A'i?T 3 S11 ?5. 236 55'
5455 1/l
SCALE 1:24 000
1 z 0 1 MILE
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET
1 .5 0 1 KILOMETER
CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 `s
THIS MAP COMPLIES WITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS \\
FOR SALE BY U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, RESTON, VIRGINIA 22092
A FOLDER DESCRIBING TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS AND SYMBOLS IS AVAILABLE ON REQUEST
6
L

\ 1 ?-oo
t
r ?
i
25
? I
60' R W
LEGEND
b, POINT
0 NEW IRON PIPE
0 EXISTING IRON PIPE
EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE
EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE
EXISTING EDGE-OF-WOODS
T.B.M. #1
RAILROAD SPIKE IN POWER POLE
NEAR FOREST HILLS ROAD.
ELEVATION 124.33
T.B.M. #2
RAILROAD SPIKE IN 18" OAK.
ELEVATION 128.80
T.B.M. #3
RAILROAD SPIKE IN 30" OAK.
ELEVATION 126.56
T.B.M. #1
ELEV. 124.33
Lid
u
PROPOSED 75' \
PERMANENT EASEMENT \
WOODS \-
M 45 TYPICAL STONE LINED
CHANNEL WITH 1.00 Fr.
\o\ THICK CLASS "A" STONE
=== ..... \ 75 S.Y.
:.?i,i'i.:•:....j.?•r.•:'••.'.ti..'•'...'•'''•''... `*V::':•:::\,`
x \
....... .'.' ....:.':`'':-:'':. \
.... \ .
it \
:::..::.:..; ........ ............... T.B.M.
O l \ .. `....... ELEV.
...
:•:•:'::::•:?
. mac: P -- _,..:'•:
INV z... ?..........
\ \ ::-::::::::•::...;........'fi x ;- - - - - - - - - -----
THORPSHIRE FARMS ,,,' \ o
P.B. 11, P. 29- . ::::::: ....... o
P.O. BOX 7058/ ..... .:: ::::
WILSON, NC 27863 IEN
JE
l
JOHNNY THOMAS BLACKWELL and
wife SUZANNE G. BLACKWELL
D.B. 1147, P. 823
2103 CANAL DR.

?_ - - - - - -- -
i
3
Z
3.M. #2
.EV. 128.80
STONE LINE GRADE
TRANSITION
1.00 FT. CLASS "A"
o \ STONE - 180 S.Y.
0
77
:
RICHARD T. SMITH,
WILL CARR SMITH, &
SARA TOMLINSON SMITH
D.B. 1286, P. 877
P.O. BOX 7058
4
WETLANDS BOUNDARY
ROCK
.. ..'w
.::: •.::. •.. ...:: "" ?' ?°j DAM
°
.. ...... .... ....
....::.::.:.:::......:::: o e
05
...
..... o 0
. ... ................
.............
.....
` :..::. ,,, . ...............
...
.......... :.
WALTER S. UNVILLE and °
wife DEAS C. UNVILLE
D.B. 1304, P. 10 -- -- -- o
2105 CANAL DR.
r.
ROBERT E. TREADWELL and
wife JAYNE W. TREADWELL
D.B. 1425, P. 301 4 ,
2107 CANAL DR.
CHECK ?
P
I
o
.......... :
11-11, ................. ..
........... .........
......................
..................
..: .
r
?.
-r
E. PROFFI
wife MARTHA L.
7to GARY
D.B. 1423. P
2111 CANAL
MARK A. THURSTON and
wife JUDITH A. THURSTON
THURSTON
D.B. 1461, P. 593
2109 CANAL DR.

T.B.M. #3
ELEV. 126
k ..
G
• : ' ......•::.
c
GARY E. PROFFITT and
wife MARTHA L. PROFFITT
D.B. 1423, P. 271
2111 CANAL DR.
L. LEE ASKEW and
wife DENISE W. ASKEW
D.B. 1417, P. 542
2117 CANAL DR.

D.B. 1128, P. 59
2201 CANAL DR.

DR. ROBEI
D.B, 106?
2205 Cf
NOTE: ALL CONSTRUCTI
CITY OF WILSON
UTILITIES SHOWN
APPROXIMATELY.
RESPONSIBLE R
OF ALL EXISTIN(
WHETI'HER SHOW
CONTRACTOR TC
REMOVAL. AND F
UT>LITIES, MALL.:
CONTRACTOR.
EROSION CONTF
SEEDING AIND N
WITHIN 30 DAYc
ACTIVITIES NOT
SILT FENCE TO
OR AS DEEMED
OBSERVATION.
SILT FENCE
ELEVATION 128.15
w
SPIKE IN 18" GUM.
ELEVATION 128.62
EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE
EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE
AAV
/. Ds BOUNDARY
?' . T.B.M. #4
c ELEV. 124.83 t
PROPOSED 75' I
PERMANENT EASEMENT -
• ? 7 5::
45
WETLANDS BOUNDARY (TYP)-? I /
_T
-r- -
--- ------ -
- -- -------- --

-
-

- -

-

1
i
TREES 3o r.," s^?K
j l_^F: o _ ` Lr 30" Gum
c - k I
) 24" GUM
---\ `-; ?- 35` GUM
BOUNDARY GUM
T.B.M. #4
CITY OF WILSON 12'' E> na $
ELEV. 124.83 D.B. 1202, P. 775 ,s:.M
P.O. BOX 10
D 75'
NT EASEMENT °r$ ......................
-
f i5" GUMS ./ O •..c:i.:•:i;tii•:ii}
.Lg
45 =.:....:::::'.
?Y.Y.:•::.• :::4'::::::::.
• ........... ... .........
..........
. ............... ................
..... ......... ............... ... ... .
...
L?
::
Jr .....:..:
........
....... ................ .
aiDG / I
O'
P
T
'\ s
-? a
:::::::::. `30f
1
RICHARD T. SMITH
D.B. 1027, P. 419
2303 CANAL DR.
nd
ITE
WILLIAM COLE ANDREWS and
wife REBECCA ALTMAN ANDREW
D.B. 1540, P. 438
2305 CANAL DR.
EXTEND 4" & 6" PVC PIPES
TO PROPOSED CHANNEL AND
LINE EAST SIDE OF CHANNEL
FROM STA. 19+00 TO STA.
20+00 WITH CLASS "A" STONE
i

--- - ----- ------ ------ -

-- --- , ------------- ----- ----- ---

t
\ co / THEODORE S. -KANIUKA and
CIT1' OF WILSON N / wife MAUREEN P. KANIUKA
D.B. 1100, P. 237 \ • / ?/ D.B. 1531, P. 110
P.O. BOX 10 2522 BUCKINGHAM ROAD,
35" GUN N
o) PROPOSED 50'
::•::....;::. •::..::..:` : ":::•:.:.: Y.
oPERMANENT EASEMENT /
... .... C
C
...:::...
:•:::
^::-:::. JACOB
:::::::....:....:;•::.
::...z;D.B. 1386
c
?•?::G , J
• :.\ `. Q Jr alb
12" WILLOW
T.B.M. #5 r
ELEV. ! 3.5• b Q ?7
cn WIRE '? SWi _•? '%-`
28. 5 _ FENCE ?l ??NG o r ?' `''1
I Lam st {'????? 4 ? ?::?::::s• '?'?.:'`?
IN TRANSITION FROM
4
'S and STA. 22+80.00
NDREWS I TO STA. 23+00.00
i8 WOOD N
BRIDGE h
•G,Or, - OWN Lei-??
JAMES H. TETTERTON arid RIDGr
wife LUCINDA H. TETfERTON t i
D.B. 1498, P. 407 JOHN N. HACKNEY, III a
2403 CANAL DR. D.B. 1436, P. 668
I 2405 CANAL DR.
/ GARY A. STURN
/ wife NANCY C.
D.B. 1528, F
2407 CANAL

--___ ---
- -- ---------
---- - ----

'
i
I y. .- .--
0
DOB WYNN T.B.M. #6
1386, P. 752
UCKINGHAM RD. ELEV. 124.62
EROSI
SEEDII
WITHIr
ACTM
SILT I
/ i OR A`,
/ HARVEY JOSEPH JONES OBSEI
& WIFE MELINDA C. JONES
/
4 / D.B. 1440, P. 830 JOHN M. BAJEK and SILT I
1 / 2526 BUCKINGHAM RD. wife MARY C. BAJEK /
D.B. 1332, P. 39
/ 2528 BUCKINGHAM DR.
o ?Jo Z AQILAH TAUB
a°O. D.B. 1546, P. 827 /
.>4•- C-UM 4 NINE ?, + .? ,may J 2528 BUCKINGHAM DR. -
F rvCF WILLIAM D. C
?C'7? o wife THEDA I
li 4., . ;-.- t ?:?:' s?.. • ' mss,.... - .... ; .: - ? ,? \ D. B. 1107.
>?': '-s' •. ;. ,J , ' •;?.• ::... Q ry 25,32 BUCKING:
'
zo 7-
¢ ?< <? ? 4 ? ? ?,) ? _ ... •..? x s'• „?•:.. N? V ?. ?ARrv ? ? li, ? o `ire-' (?
, }
l?
--j CIV
STURNER and
'Y C. STURNER h. r7
528, P. 417 /PAUL L. WALTERS, 111 and wife
CANAL DR. CAROL STOCKDALE WALTERS
/ D.B. 12432, P. 35 RICHARD EARLY REEVES and a
2409 CANAL DR. /wife CANDANCE GOOCH REEVES L
D.B. 1210, P. 654
/ 2411 CANAL DR. / V
F?
WILLIE NATHANIEL DIXON
D.B. 1403 P. 233
/ 2507 CANAL DR.
?.
VALVE 'NA.'ER
->-li VALVE---
VALVE 4J t:
BUCKINGHAM DRIVE TOP WATER - ---- --
? ° 134 8^
WILLIAM D. CADY and

wife THEDA L CADY
O D.B. 1107, 728
O 2532 BUCKINGHAM dr.
O
O T.B.M. #7
'+' ELEV. 131.11
? Z
C4
Q D •? -r ? ?Y 0+11 w

L ..
S I
. s
4 'MtR
FE,1'CE
T ?i t /
?? , J ,/; I41
s it
j L `U w y ?S
2
-PROPOSED I
y` t,
CATCH BASINS] i NCIION
CALVIN BR E ROSE &
EDWARD R. HARDISON & xj 2-N.C.D.O.T. NO. 838.22
WIFE, MARGUERITE B. HARD IS0
Is
' ` ' I REINFORCED CONCRETE END
D.B. 1066, P. 123 WALLS W/ 60 LF TRIPLE
i 2509 CANAL DR. 54"0 RCP'S 90' SKEW

c? w
G J ?
w a-a
2 Q ?
l-'ro I o
BAR 4 I J
' '; ' W ?; WIFE, DOLORES P. ROSE ALLEN M. JONES &
I PROPOSED BLIND I D.B. 1065, P. 784 WIFE, CYNTHIA J. JONES
JUNCTION BOX I 't 2601 CANAL DR. D.B. 1180, P. 332
'! j O I 2603 CANAL DR.

m -- - -
CAN DRIVE

GAS
I I !NV- 7 27.44

G
VALUE AS
VALVE
? I I SMAUEL CASWELL (- - - --T
Z
i LATHAM, JR.
_
I I D.B. 1548, P. 848 I J. THOMAS TAYLOR &

I 2600
I BUCKINGHAM WIFE OPHELIA M. TAYLOR "

w J
RD D.B. 1229, P. 362
. 2602 BUCKINGHAM DR.
REPLACE 60 LF OF
CURB & GUTTER ON
j EACH SIDE, STONE BASE
& ASPHALT PAVING
?? !"
I i CLASS "A" STONE
;, I w
a 1.00 FT. THICK
220 S Y
' I x ' j/ 7 G i
SAR-N
BARN I C `' I I
?J I ! HD I ?, r I CONC
x ?? Fir I PAD
I WALL /" ?