20191406 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20191011

DR
02*10n of Water R"Ourc"
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance into the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
Version#*
20191406
1
Is a payment required for this project?*
* No payment required
What amout is owed?*
* Fee received
r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone] Chad Turlington:eads\ccturlington
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Purfoy Place Subdivision
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
James Minor
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
10/11/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Kenneth Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
WS -Iv
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.532361
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Harnett
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-78.787769
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
F Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
P Nationwide Permit (NWP)
F- Regional General Permit (RGP)
r- Standard (IP)
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r' Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
P 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
F Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
F Individual Permit
29 - Residential Developments
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
F Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
19. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r• Yes r- No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r' Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Q Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
C Yes r- No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Minoball, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
3636;0083
2c. Responsible party:
James Minor
2d. Address
Street Address
1001 Procure Street
Address Line 2
Suite 101
aty
Fuquay-Varina
Postal / Zip Cade
27526
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
State / Province / R icn
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
r- Yes r No
r- Yes r No

1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
Purfoy Place
1c. Nearest municipality/town:
Fuquay-Varina
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0664-38-0507.000
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Purfoy Road
Address Line 2
City
Fuquay-Varina
Rstal / Zip Cade
27526
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Kenneth Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS -IV
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300040501
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
33.5
State / Rovince / rb7nn
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Site is currently covered by a near 50% - 50% mix of abandoned agricultural fields and forest. Adjacent land use south and east of the property is agricultural and low density
residential. Adjacent land use north and west of the property is medium density residential.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
C' Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
USGS.pdf 2.19MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
JamesTutorProp_SoilSurvey_Final.pdf 2.21 MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.513 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1,459 If
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
Purpose of the proposed project is to install infrastructure and grading as required for 45 new single-family home sites.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
This project will be constructed with a single road, Harnett County water and sanitary sewer, stormwater collection and conveyances, and grading as required to support 45 new single-
family home sites. Equipment used Will be tracked excavators, dump trucks, bulldozers, rollers, paving equipment, etc.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
C2.0 GRAD-OA.pdf
2.01MB
C2.1 SUBD (1).pdf
1.03MB
C2.1 SUBD.pdf
1.03MB
C2.2 SUBD.pdf
1015.36KB
C2.3 SUBD.pdf
1.19MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No f Unknown
Comments:

5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary f Approved f Not Verified r Unknown r WA
Corps AID Number:
SAW -2018-01019
Sc. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Scott Mitchell
Agency/Consultant Company: Mitchell Environmental
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
October 29, 2018
Sd1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Signed Corps PJD 102918.pdf 534.98KB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity?
No.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
R Wetlands PF Streams -tributaries r Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason(?) 2b. Impact type * (?) 2c. Type of W. * 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested* 21. Type of J1l2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area
Im act 1 Road Crossing P Headwater Forest Wetland F -G Yes Both 0.062
P
(acres)
ff:::Il
2g. Total Temporary
Road Grading
Temporary
Relocation
Stream B
Intermittent
Both
2
Average (feet)
249
(linear feet)
Road Crossin9Pest
Driveway Crossing
Permanent
tland BYesBoth
Stream B
Intermittent
0.079
(acres)
Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.141
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.141
11
3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of width * 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
S1
Road Grading
Temporary
Relocation
Stream B
Intermittent
Both
2
Average (feet)
249
(linear feet)
S2
Driveway Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
Stream B
Intermittent
Both
2
Average (feet)
83
(linearfcet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
83
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
332
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
249

3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
All feature crossing impacts are designed as close to perpendicular as possible, in order to minimize impacts. The proposed stream relocation impact
is designed as short as possible to minimize temporary impacts to this feature, while also providing sufficient length to allowfor reasonable road
grading.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Limits of disturbance will be clearly marked wth silt fence / tree protection fence combination before any clearing or grading is allowed.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
F DWR W Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
r- Mitigation bank r Payment to in -lieu fee F Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
Project area is not in a riparian buffer protected basin.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federallstate/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?*
f Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This single-family residential subdivision is unlikely to spur cumulative impacts outside of the project site.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*

r Yes r No r N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
Sa. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r- Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r- Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
r Unknown
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
US Fish & Wildlife Service, Harnett County list of Endangered and Threatened species.
Consultation Documentation Upload
Harnett County Endangered Species.pdf 113.53KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r- Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC DCR HPOWEB.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
HPOWEB-Purfoy Place 101119.pdf 77.17KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
r- Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
Harnett County GIS Flood Hazard Zones layer.
Miscellaneous
Comments
Per the current NC Mitigation Bank Credit Availability List, only one bank eAsts in the project basin that offers wetlands mitigation credits (Barra Farms Phase II Wetland Mitigation Site).
We reached out to their listed contact (Tiffani Bylow) this morning with a request for mitigation credits. We will provide you with a credit reservation letter from them if they have credits
available. If they do not have credits available, we will reach out to NC DMS to request a credit reservation letter from them. A wetland mitigation credit reservation letter will be emailed
directly to you upon receipt from one of these providers.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Signature -
*
,r! By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:

• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
. I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
. I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
. I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Scoff Mitchell
Signature
x'0774411 -C#911 -
Date
10/11/2019

Mitchell Environmental, P.A.
The Department of the Army
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
To Whom It May Concern:
AGENT AUTHORIZATION and
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION FORM
All Blanks to be Fi!!ed in byApplicant
(When Applicant has property/properties under contract
to purchase from duly authorized owner of record)
NCDENR — Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
1, the applicant, hereby designate and authorize representatives of Mitchell Environmental, P.A., to act on my
behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in
support of applications, etc., rom this day forward.
This the -I` day of 20�
(number) (M nth) (Year)
1, the undersigned applicant, with written authorization from a duly authorized owner of record of the
Property/properties identified herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps} to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site
investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Project Name: o[e5 Tu -4.
_ Location: pled,, t C h
Property Applicant's Name
Property Applicant's Signati
Property Applicant's Mailing Address:
o/
Property Applicant's Telephone: ZIF —SFax No. p
Property Applicant's Email Address: ,t i stir: ra. LIZ- - -
1509 Lakestone Village Lane, Suite 205
Fuquay-Vanna, North Carolina 27526
999-669-0329

m
m C n m
mIT
7 ❑
\ n
m 00
p n c
DoB W 03 m W o 0 1c f
C1 �+ co o O W 1} m
as 0 m n r^ W
n
.•. o
m o m v CeA
° W P ,� ed
CMD133
W F W III Q1 m
CID
d m D D
f m
g n n co
W Z Z I W T O CA6
c r 4 W
W n C n o C
Q m
o r o
N� m Ca " W e
O
`U7 \ a W
o n ca N°C
w W
3°, Y y m n mC7n `C
m I W
E
7 °
Z co m m a ° o� ga D0A m m n
� m B
k h CeD F zm p n c°O $b C3 m
n m o C O B /t/ (n CID
m n W n m m WCID
rr
p m n m m m CD 0
W q „ CA
ry m m °m o O
om —•
of
WkB J n m G
CD
o a a ,� G
C m n a
m d� W
0
�' iD Beg m �b
IMP
m
Ali. D°e n O W
m (loins insef, sheet 7) m o
m n m

G y FfT0E4l �
w � 7
µTnI51 N4y■m_Yb2e free Ln
R■�■ ayakd
J `�TI7B'Sk
Ha"
Rawi�
HTpm1T r[o[.. rftp�b4<t r[ouw '+Tames Npa■
e 3 e Ram{ Chm to Ncl HT +•m= Haka*
f
nTU41! -ops■
ITDI-"
HTI:M2 Stat
"KnMI Hoa■
.'mesa �o[ne
'1Teast u�sar,�.rn
Ll.Kc.t a nsacr� a c.n+mr
4[ LN }r FV GY
p tl HTUSM hast
S '
P■h■L kr■dl■Pan#�hr �
hdrAV xw b[
a wkr'af.A R
*.pp Ur WALKE
�wau.drtr a' r
x Y7
Chu, [a■Rtl 3
P
V i A 0341 L C7■ylt � 4
* ■� .
IPurfoy Place I
Subdivision
HARdM
�°K[r CA14A oil
Ath;n VW �
Y.
NTT04? 46u'a
X
r
"s
r4f��o lfc i ■ PIt LN
M&4 L■ Q
tr
Trraa[`f C2ey, 4 Nffth QfNi" DOT. fim HI,RF, Carmin. LNCRPMENT P. NCA LAM

Harnett County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species...
https://www.fws.gov/mleigh/species/cntylist/hamett.htnil
Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of
Concern, and Candidate Species,
Harnett County, North Carolina
Updated: 10-10-2018
Common Name Scientific name
Vertebrate:
Bald eagle
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Cape Fear shiner Range by Basin
Notropis mekistocholas
Carolina madtom Range by Basin
Noturus furiosus
Neuse River waterdog Range by
Necturus lewisi
basin
Red -cockaded woodpecker
Picoides borealis
Invertebrate:
Atlantic pigtoe Range by Basin
Fusconaia masoni
Septima's clubtail
Gomphus septima
Vascular Plant:
Carolina bogmint
Macbridea carohniana
Georgia lead -plant
Amorpha georgiana var.
Rough -leaved loosestrife
Sun -facing coneflower
Nonvascular Plant:
Lichen:
georgiana
Lysimachia asperulaefolia
Rudbeckia hehopsidis
Federal Record Status
Status
BGPA
Current
E
Current
ARS
Current
ARS
Current
E Current
ARS
Current
ARS
Current
ARS
Current
ARS
Current
E Current
ARS Historic
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range."
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information to
support listing. (Formerly "C1" candidate species.)
1 of 2 10/11/2019, 7:18 AM

Harnett County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species...
https://www.fws.gov/mleigh/species/cntylist/hamett.htnil
BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. See below.
ARS = At Risk Species. Species that are Petitioned, Candidates or Proposed for Listing under the Endangered
Species Act. Consultation under Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA is not required for Candidate or Proposed species;
although a Conference, as described under Section 7(a)(4) of the ESA is recommended for actions affecting
species proposed for listing.
FSC=Federal Species of Concern. FSC is an informal term. It is not defined in the federal Endangered Species
Act. In North Carolina, the Asheville and Raleigh Field Offices of the US Fish and Wildlife Service (Service)
define Federal Species of Concern as those species that appear to be in decline or otherwise in need of
conservation and are under consideration for listing or for which there is insufficient information to support
listing at this time.Subsumed under the term "FSC" are all species petitioned by outside parties and other
selected focal species identified in Service strategic plans, State Wildlife Action Plans, or Natural Heritage
Program Lists.
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of appearance
with another listed species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S/A) are not biologically
endangered or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. See below.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential).
Experimental, nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened species
on public land, for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
P = proposed. Taxa proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened will be noted as "PE" or "PT",
respectively.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA):
In the July 9, 2007 Federal Register( 72:37346-37372), the bald eagle was declared recovered, and removed
(de -listed) from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered wildlife. This delisting took effect August
8,2007. After delisting, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C. 668-668d) becomes
the primary law protecting bald eagles. The Eagle Act prohibits take of bald and golden eagles and provides a
statutory definition of "take" that includes "disturb". The USFWS has developed National Bald Eagle
Management Guidelines to provide guidance to land managers, landowners, and others as to how to avoid
disturbing bald eagles. For mor information, visit http://www.fws. og v/mi rg atoabirds/baldea e.htm
Threatened due to similarity of appearance(T(S/A)):
In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822-55825), the northern population of the bog turtle (from
New York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from Virginia south
to Georgia) was listed as T(S/A) (threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T(S/A) designation bans the
collection and interstate and international commercial trade of bog turtles from the southern population. The
T(S/A) designation has no effect on land management activities by private landowners in North Carolina, part
of the southern population of the species. In addition to its official status as T(S/A), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service considers the southern population of the bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
Definitions of Record Status:
Current - the species has been observed in the county within the last 50 years.
Historic - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
Obscure - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable/potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of known
records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.
2 of 2 10/11/2019, 7:18 AM

•�\�\i)rlllly J I IS{ \ r
SII I /'II
Sit fill I,/11
/
J/1
Jf
30'0
�� �� ✓ r BUFFEF
AL EJANDRO ESCOBAR
KATHERINE
COOPER-ESCOBAR
DB: 3157; PG: 996
it
X l/
1j11111�111� � 1 1
1hl{ !Id i `}J I11
4I�
yIIIIfI I l! i ttl
KEVIN LYNCH
ANNIE F. LYNCH
DB: 1205; PG: 0161
\\\ v
1) A,
GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL "NORTH CAROLINA ONE CALL" (1-800-632-4949) AT LEAST 48 11.A PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
HOURS PRIOR TO DIGGING TO HAVE EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATED. REPORT ANY ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MUST BE SCHEDULED PRIOR TO ANY WORK, GRADING OR
DISCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEER. INSTALLATION OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
2. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ACTIVITIES WITH UTILITY COMPANIES INVOLVED IN ANY
RELATED RELOCATION (I.E. POWER POLES, TELEPHONE PEDESTALS, WATER METERS,
ETC.).
3. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS AND THE BEST AVAILABLE
RECORD DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CONDITIONS PRIOR TO
BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD
CONDITIONS AND THE PLANS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.
4. ALL PROPOSED INLETS, CATCH BASINS, AND DROP INLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS SHOWN AND SPECIFIED ON THE EROSION CONTROL
PLAN.
5. A P.E. OR AN R.L.S. SEAL IS REQUIRED ON ALL AS -BUILT IMPERVIOUS SURFACES.
6. THE CURB INLETS AND YARD INLETS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE LOCATIONS
SHOWN UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR REPORTING ANY DISCREPANCIES IN THE CATCH BASIN ELEVATIONS
OR THE PROPOSED PIPE SLOPES TO THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR IS ALSO
RESPONSIBLE TO REPORT ANY CONFLICTS BETWEEN ANY UTILITY, STORM DRAIN LINE,
WATER LINE, SEWER LINE OR ANY OTHER PROPOSED OR EXISTING STRUCTURE TO
THE ENGINEER.
7. A LAND DISTURBING PERMIT ISSUED BY NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY
LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES.
8. ALL EXISTING VAULTS, MANHOLES, STORM DRAIN STRUCTURES, VALVE BOXES,
CLEANOUTS, ETC. SHALL BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO MATCH FINISHED GRADE.
9. ALL BACKFILL, COMPACTION, SOILS TESTING, ETC. SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE
OWNER'S INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY.
12. ALL HANDICAP PARKING SPACES AND STRIPED ACCESSIBILITY AISLES ARE TO HAVE NO
MORE THAN A 1:50 (2.0%) SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS. ALL SIDEWALKS ARE TO HAVE NO
MORE THAN A 1:20 (5.0%) SLOPE FOR THE LENGTH OF THE SIDEWALK AND NO MORE
THAN A 1:50 (2.0%) SLOPE FOR THE WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK.
13. IF CONTRACTOR NOTICES ANY DISCREPANCIES IN ANY OF THESE SLOPE
REQUIREMENTS, IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE OWNER
PRIOR TO PLACING ANY HARDSCAPE SO THAT A SOLUTION CAN BE FOUND.
14. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE GIVEN AT THE MAJORITY OF THE MAJOR BREAK POINTS BUT IT
SHOULD NOT BE ASSUMED THAT ALL NECESSARY SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN. DUE
TO SPACE LIMITATIONS, THERE MAY BE OTHER CRITICAL SPOTS NOT LABELED THAT
SHOULD BE TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE
GRADING PLAN IN DETAIL AND SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL CRITICAL GRADE POINTS ARE
STAKED AND FOLLOWED TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.
15.ALL STORM DRAIN PIPES SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH STONE FILTER PROTECTION
AFTER STOPPAGE OF WORK EACH DAY (SEE DETAIL SHEET).
16.EXISTING VEGETATION WITHIN TREE PROTECTIVE AREAS SHALL REMAIN UNDISTURBED
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ANY AND ALL LANDSCAPING AND EXISTING TREES &
SHRUBS TO REMAIN WHICH ARE DAMAGED DURING DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION
SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR USING A LICENSED LANDSCAPE
CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.
17.THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL STATE CODES IN OBSERVING
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES BOTH ON AND OFF-SITE. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR
SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT OR AS
DIRECTED BY THE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR OR THE ARCHITECT.
18. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OFF-SITE DISPOSAL OF ALL
CLEARING AND GRADING WASTE MATERIALS GENERATED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND
FOR OBTAINING ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS FOR OFF-SITE STOCKPILES AND/OR WASTE
10. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS INDICATED ARE AT BACK OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. AREAS.
ALL E�EVAT O\ yaS kRR B,bSED ON N�, CRI D,NORTF (NAD,8,3
/ I) / , N S > �1 \ 111- , } \ \ \ I } �19.ALL CATCH BASINS MUST BE MARKED "DUMP NO WASTE DRAINS TO STREAM" OR
\ } \ 1 }!' 1 1 1 I I �? J \ \ �- I -EQUIVALENT.' J r > f t
111 111 J^/J�� �\l�� 1 1
I/�//I J a 1111)en J/
ll {\ �! 1 t� \1\ r1
I J �• �� _ t 1
I 3' 1 ) / 1 \1///,, l/ Jr r / >)J 1tv✓r\� �r \/ter r� \�� �.` �_i 1 l ! f ) t l / /� )
ci _ / i )/ �w� 11 ///(�< /JJ��.,.,
1y J;///�.fl✓•oR-LL`• �=S>//1 r �\\^ \> \ J f �! �// J-r��J..'-r/ ,� // 1
\�\ \(✓ �� r J l 1 r J
`s Il I-eelI 1' �� 1 -/i .340� - 17
1` \ )V
"V I i/cl��Z���% L' Y 1 L ` t , n `;` J� �� ^ ✓/ J / r �J J .� 1 y J \ / / \ - ^ ^ ' 1
} �� \ l I ) 1 ,( 1��T \ \-� '!'l/' 1' - _ �' " f �•- �/ i ,r /J
350
s _ - _ - _ - _ -� f - JAMWS C. GREGORY
'WOODSLtNE
GRADING LEGEND
250
252
250
---252__
TP
LD
CA
0
250.60
TC
250.00
STORM DRAINAGE
WOODED AREA
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
EASEMENT LINE
SILT FENCE/TREE PROTECTION FENCE
LIIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
FLARED END SECTION
CATCH BASIN
DROP INLET
JUNCTION BOX
SPOT ELEVATION
TOP OF CURB
ELEVATIONS
X350^ r. r / -1 ;
- - 4 - - - - ~ - -ti
ADDRESS: 1304 N. RESPESS STREET, WASHINGTON, N.C. 27889 EMAIL: [e-mail] Phone: [phone]
'M SOIA_,R: GREGORY - - - - - '
D 11831; PG: 9.79- 1_
— — — r — —_ T� 350 ,
L ._ - Q r- �
350.x- -
��- ,�•—� I — 15' STREETSCAPE
BUFFER
45 =
_ ,hD� . 350 75' PRIME VIEW r 3 n
/1 - =
y1lET / - ` SETBACK
Il�Ill�l/1/\:. (7 !h ^J!
`
it I r r 31L�3/JgS I �J
Ln
o 1
DELINEATED I l w l f CO
MAIL KIOSK I� � - I //[\�-
\ WETLANDS 1 o M
re /' / i i I I I I M M �\ \O L�
ESeTUT �r - I y I I I WW M O L\
&ORA TL�T \ 1 ) \ I 1 1 t�
! ` �} 14H- 80(3, RG: f 8'3 (r 1> I 1 II I� MV
ONE
POND
11 ��11�
I / 1 \ S / h\\
) � \ /` \ \11r l III 1
) 339 a\ 1
\I ! 1
t r l ! _\ i'�ll�l ) I 1 - ✓ ai f\ \ l l( j)ll
) J�� JJJJI I` �= I 1 � IiII C)r(�IIJ\�lll~` l /
/� J •lr '( -i J tXISITING .1 f ( \� \�;`�I_.
^WAItE>LINE I t�\ �) ) ii(\
I I l �I'I �l lily
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH HARNETT COUNTY AND NCDOT STANDARDS,
SPECIFICATIONS, AND DETAILS.
LIMTS OF DISTURBANCE = 19.00 AC.
SCALE 1"=150'
NOR
0 150' 300'
p,j�ELOP�jFN��
LICENSE
C-2743
ORTN CA ROS'\ G
/GH,
>>>H CARO
i
`� ©� FESS/0• ��.�
a SEAL r -
/
N4.9-.-
GINE�•
111111
AUGUST 15, 2019
HARNETT COUNTY PROJECT :
7/21/19:
REVISE GRADING, GRADING,
SANITARY SEWER, ADJUST LOT 27
08/15/2018:
REVISE GRADING AT CUL-DE-SAC,
STORM DRAINAGE, WATERLINE
DATE: MAY 16, 2019
ISSUED FOR: REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DRAWINGS
OVERALL
GRADING &
DRAINAGE
PLAN
•
C 2.0
DRAWN BY: SBT CHECKED BY: SBT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CAROLINA LAND DEVELOPMENT

RAWL/S-CHURCH ROAD
(S.R.1446) 60' RIGHT-OF-WAY
T I ,
OAK CREEK SUBDIVISION
\✓ r-_�--�-- _M 1 �� /� 1 PC-C,SLIDE: 83D I \ / -rte
------- \ i -
_ 1 \ LANDSCAPED BERM r / �/
(3' TALL x 3' WIDE TOP)
-
J ' I J
I I
N 1
N
U
I_
LU iLU
U)
LU ILU
U)
w
Z_
J I2
U I
Q
/
LANDSCAPED BERM
(3' TALL x 3' WIDE TOP)
i J / 360
I � �
I /
r
STORM STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE #
TOP
STRUCTURE HEIGHT
DESCRIPTION
CB201
338.00
5.00'
Curb Inlet
CB202
338.00
4.35'
Curb Inlet
CB301
347.75
5.30'
Curb Inlet
CB302
353.95
5.20'
Curb Inlet
CB303
353.95
4.80'
Curb Inlet
CB304
347.75
4.50'
Curb Inlet
FES100
333.79
5.06'
Flared End Section
FES101
336.19
3.42'
Flared End Section
FES200
333.42
4.10'
Flared End Section
l
1 J 35
J -I
- J - - - - - -350 - - J / = C' - - - _
STORM PIPE TABLE
PIPE #
DIA
FROM - TO
UPSTREAM
DOWNSTREAMINVERT INVERT
SLOPE
LENGTH
DESCRIPTION
100-101
18"
FES100 - FES101
332.00
334.40
-3.42%
70.12 LF
RCP
200-201
15"
CB201 - FES200
333.00
331.90
3.29%
33.40 LF
15" RCP
201-202
15"
CB202 - CB201
333.65
333.10
2.08%
26.49 LF
15" RCP
301-304
18"
CB304 - CB301
343.25
342.65
2.26%
26.50 LF
18" RCP
301-302
15"
CB301 - CB302
343.20
348.75
1.70%
327.32 LF
15" RCP
302-303
15"
CB303 - CB302
J
348.85
1.13%
26.50 LF
15" RCP
POND
GRADING LEGEND
STORM PIPE TABLE
PIPE #
DIA
FROM - TO
UPSTREAM
DOWNSTREAMINVERT INVERT
SLOPE
LENGTH
DESCRIPTION
100-101
18"
FES100 - FES101
332.00
334.40
-3.42%
70.12 LF
RCP
200-201
15"
CB201 - FES200
333.00
331.90
3.29%
33.40 LF
15" RCP
201-202
15"
CB202 - CB201
333.65
333.10
2.08%
26.49 LF
15" RCP
301-304
18"
CB304 - CB301
343.25
342.65
2.26%
26.50 LF
18" RCP
301-302
15"
CB301 - CB302
343.20
348.75
1.70%
327.32 LF
15" RCP
302-303
15"
CB303 - CB302
349.15
348.85
1.13%
26.50 LF
15" RCP
250
252
250
------252----
TP
LD
cm
250.60
TC
250.00
STORM DRAINAGE
WOODED AREA
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
EASEMENT LINE
SILT FENCE/TREE PROTECTION FENCE
LIIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
FLARED END SECTION
CATCH BASIN
DROP INLET
JUNCTION BOX
SPOT ELEVATION
TOP OF CURB
ELEVATIONS
ADDRESS: 1304 N. RESPESS STREET, WASHINGTON, N.C. 27889 EMAIL: [e-mail] Phone: [phone]
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH HARNETT COUNTY AND NCDOT STANDARDS,
SPECIFICATIONS, AND DETAILS.
LIMTS OF DISTURBANCE = 19.00 AC.
J-,
SCALE 1"=40'
NOR
0 40' 80'
p,j�ELOP�jFN��
w LICENSE 9=
C-2743
-f ORTN CARO'\ G
a SEAL04
r
� ���, GINE , •\�.
R g� Its \\�
AUGUST 15, 2019
HARNETT COUNTY PROJECT #:
7/21/19:
REVISE GRADING, GRADING,
SANITARY SEWER, ADJUST LOT 27
08/15/2018:
REVISE GRADING AT CUL-DE-SAC,
STORM DRAINAGE, WATERLINE
DATE: MAY 16, 2019
ISSUED FOR: REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DRAWINGS
GRADING
PLAN
C 2.1
DRAWN BY: SBT CHECKED BY: SBT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CAROLINA LAND DEVELOPMENT

RAWL/S-CHURCH ROAD
(S.R.1446) 60' RIGHT-OF-WAY
T I ,
OAK CREEK SUBDIVISION
\✓ r-_�--�-- _M 1 �� /� 1 PC-C,SLIDE: 83D I \ / -rte
------- \ i -
_ 1 \ LANDSCAPED BERM r / �/
(3' TALL x 3' WIDE TOP)
-
J ' I J
I I
N 1
N
U
I_
LU iLU
U)
LU ILU
U)
w
Z_
J I2
U I
Q
/
LANDSCAPED BERM
(3' TALL x 3' WIDE TOP)
i J / 360
I � �
I /
r
STORM STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE #
TOP
STRUCTURE HEIGHT
DESCRIPTION
CB201
338.00
5.00'
Curb Inlet
CB202
338.00
4.35'
Curb Inlet
CB301
347.75
5.30'
Curb Inlet
CB302
353.95
5.20'
Curb Inlet
CB303
353.95
4.80'
Curb Inlet
CB304
347.75
4.50'
Curb Inlet
FES100
333.79
5.06'
Flared End Section
FES101
336.19
3.42'
Flared End Section
FES200
333.42
4.10'
Flared End Section
l
1 J 35
J -I
- J - - - - - -350 - - J / = C' - - - _
STORM PIPE TABLE
PIPE #
DIA
FROM - TO
UPSTREAM
DOWNSTREAMINVERT INVERT
SLOPE
LENGTH
DESCRIPTION
100-101
18"
FES100 - FES101
332.00
334.40
-3.42%
70.12 LF
RCP
200-201
15"
CB201 - FES200
333.00
331.90
3.29%
33.40 LF
15" RCP
201-202
15"
CB202 - CB201
333.65
333.10
2.08%
26.49 LF
15" RCP
301-304
18"
CB304 - CB301
343.25
342.65
2.26%
26.50 LF
18" RCP
301-302
15"
CB301 - CB302
343.20
348.75
1.70%
327.32 LF
15" RCP
302-303
15"
CB303 - CB302
J
348.85
1.13%
26.50 LF
15" RCP
POND
GRADING LEGEND
STORM PIPE TABLE
PIPE #
DIA
FROM - TO
UPSTREAM
DOWNSTREAMINVERT INVERT
SLOPE
LENGTH
DESCRIPTION
100-101
18"
FES100 - FES101
332.00
334.40
-3.42%
70.12 LF
RCP
200-201
15"
CB201 - FES200
333.00
331.90
3.29%
33.40 LF
15" RCP
201-202
15"
CB202 - CB201
333.65
333.10
2.08%
26.49 LF
15" RCP
301-304
18"
CB304 - CB301
343.25
342.65
2.26%
26.50 LF
18" RCP
301-302
15"
CB301 - CB302
343.20
348.75
1.70%
327.32 LF
15" RCP
302-303
15"
CB303 - CB302
349.15
348.85
1.13%
26.50 LF
15" RCP
250
252
250
------252----
TP
LD
cm
250.60
TC
250.00
STORM DRAINAGE
WOODED AREA
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
EASEMENT LINE
SILT FENCE/TREE PROTECTION FENCE
LIIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
FLARED END SECTION
CATCH BASIN
DROP INLET
JUNCTION BOX
SPOT ELEVATION
TOP OF CURB
ELEVATIONS
ADDRESS: 1304 N. RESPESS STREET, WASHINGTON, N.C. 27889 EMAIL: [e-mail] Phone: [phone]
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH HARNETT COUNTY AND NCDOT STANDARDS,
SPECIFICATIONS, AND DETAILS.
LIMTS OF DISTURBANCE = 19.00 AC.
J-,
SCALE 1"=40'
NOR
0 40' 80'
p,j�ELOP�jFN��
w LICENSE 9=
C-2743
-f ORTN CARO'\ G
a SEAL04
r
� ���, GINE , •\�.
R g� Its \\�
AUGUST 15, 2019
HARNETT COUNTY PROJECT #:
7/21/19:
REVISE GRADING, GRADING,
SANITARY SEWER, ADJUST LOT 27
08/15/2018:
REVISE GRADING AT CUL-DE-SAC,
STORM DRAINAGE, WATERLINE
DATE: MAY 16, 2019
ISSUED FOR: REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DRAWINGS
GRADING
PLAN
C 2.1
DRAWN BY: SBT CHECKED BY: SBT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CAROLINA LAND DEVELOPMENT

01)
N
U
H
W
W
2
U)
W
W
W
z_
J
U
Q
Irl
345 \ \ \` \ II \ )
I (
\t \\ \ / )I \ - ✓ \ / \ 1 y
OAK CREEK SUBDIVISION I I I / ;' / – ly–
/ \ \ i PC: C, SLIDE: 83D, � / ) / � " / _
I ( TREE PROTECTION \ / \\ / / / / ) / \ / I I I I / LANDSCAPED BERM
, .
' c ( TYP
FENCE ) ) � J \ \ // 1 / I / (' � I I I ` I I / I / c / (3' TALL x 3' WIDE TOP)
\ \ < \ I \ \ \ �\ / I / J I 1\ 1 I J t' ( / \ v 360- j
/
LIMITS OF / (10 / 11 1 \\–�
DISTURBANCE, (TYP.) 20 REAR YARD ` ` �\ // / �� \ \\ J / \ \ ( I / �7 , �6 � ; _--_-
> / SETBACK, (TYP.) ELIN TED // / l\ r 15 PERIMETER { yy l / _ _ l _ _ _ _ _ _ I
Q� RIRRAP VELOCITY / J \ / r
/ / . �WETLAll93' / > BUFFER, (TYP.) \ / \ \ / '/T I
— — \ \ — \
L
SIPATOR, (TYP.)
—IL
If
IK
Z I \ i n i n .. . - - - - I \� .\ —/ \' \ \ \/ \ .� y \ 1 \ ) / / / / - i i / r I IF /
\
I11 I\19
\ \ ) 7578.25 SQ. FT_.
\ \ 0.40 AC
LD LD \
.34p -
05 \
33
I33_
I — — 17554.81 SCS. -FT-
0.4.Q
FT0.,4.Q AC \ l
_ � J
)< I 1 \ I
WI
IW / yIf
1/
/ J DELI,NEJTED
/ / ) WETLA DS
1
If
I I�
/
STORM STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE #
TOP
STRUCTURE HEIGHT
DESCRIPTION
CB401
348.95
5.70'
Curb Inlet
CB402
349.20
5.45'
Curb Inlet
CB403
353.85
4.60'
Curb Inlet
CB404
353.85
4.15'
Curb Inlet
\ \ I I UIJ I UMD/11VliC, 1 I T r.J
JAMES C. TUTOR _ 1
DEBRA TUTOR
DB: 803�-RGL368`
\ \
GRADING LEGEND
STORM PIPE TABLE
PIPE #
DIA
FROM - TO
UPSTREAM
DOWNSTREAMINVERT INVERT
SLOPE
LENGTH
DESCRIPTION
400-401
18"
CB401 - FES400
343.25
342.00
1.19%
104.93 LF
18" RCP
401-402
18"
CB401 - CB402
343.35
343.75
1.10%
36.36 LF
18" RCP
402-403
15"
CB403 - CB402
349.25
344.20
2.00%
251.97 LF
15" RCP
403-404
15"
CB404 - CB403
349.70
349.40
1.13%
26.50 LF
15" RCP
250
252
250
252
TP
LD
ca
■
250.60
25TC
0.00
STORM DRAINAGE
WOODED AREA
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
EASEMENT LINE
SILT FENCE/TREE PROTECTION FENCE
LIIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
FLARED END SECTION
CATCH BASIN
DROP INLET
JUNCTION BOX
SPOT ELEVATION
TOP OF CURB
ELEVATIONS
ADDRESS: 1304 N. RESPESS STREET, WASHINGTON, N.C. 27889 EMAIL: [e-mail] Phone: [phone]
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH HARNETT COUNTY AND NCDOT STANDARDS,
SPECIFICATIONS, AND DETAILS.
LIMTS OF DISTURBANCE = 19.00 AC.
I
I
10
17517.9//1 pS,,��Q. FT. I
— _0,4Q3AIC—
I/
I
I
I
42
17554.81 SQ. FT.,
0.40 AC
-364 - I
I
L1
C')
00
0
Q
z
p,j�ELOP�jFN��
LICENSE
C-2743
f OR TN CARO'--' G
\\0\1111!!///x//
CARO
a SEAL r
GIN14/
E , • \�.
AUGUST 15, 2019
HARNETT COUNTY PROJECT #:
7/21/19:
REVISE GRADING, GRADING,
SANITARY SEWER, ADJUST LOT 27
08/15/2018:
REVISE GRADING AT CUL-DE-SAC,
STORM DRAINAGE, WATERLINE
I
— / I
I
I -
DATE: MAY 16, 2019
ISSUED FOR: REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DRAWINGS
SCALE 1"=40'
NOR
0 40' 80'
GRADING
PLAN
C 2.2
DRAWN BY: SBT CHECKED BY: SBT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CAROLINA LAND DEVELOPMENT
z
x
W
~ Qom
U)
oz�
LU
U)
W
z_
w �4
w
=
O
�
x
HARNETT COUNTY PROJECT #:
7/21/19:
REVISE GRADING, GRADING,
SANITARY SEWER, ADJUST LOT 27
08/15/2018:
REVISE GRADING AT CUL-DE-SAC,
STORM DRAINAGE, WATERLINE
I
— / I
I
I -
DATE: MAY 16, 2019
ISSUED FOR: REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DRAWINGS
SCALE 1"=40'
NOR
0 40' 80'
GRADING
PLAN
C 2.2
DRAWN BY: SBT CHECKED BY: SBT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CAROLINA LAND DEVELOPMENT

Lp
CO
o
; (( II II I 1% ( I\ I\1 I (I I J I / / IA\K PCREA�\K`SUBDIVISION
C
��IDE: 83D
BOBBYLPPINC
"cp0.
II
uYNE�4fR/&C),E`
--\\'c'wllll 111\ 11\\ \\�\ 11 1 I / I I I I I I I ( \ \\ `\,\ _--' \ -\ \ \ -\
--- \o (\ 1 1 1\\ DB: 678; PG:431I
-
275- - -1 1 1
1 (^
\ \ \ 15 PERIMETER
BUFFER,TYP.
___-•/� /I I I I , I I I I� \11 I I \I \ I l I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ^� --' ( )
17)16 15
/ /� I JI \J/^i�l I I I 1 I \ \ I 1 \ � \ \ _' ' J ` -
1 / / 1 � ( 1 \ 1 I I I \ \ / \ ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I l \
~ L1 •��\ }\ \ \ �\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ IN, \
1�
TTI -T�-=��'I- -� \\ \\ Ir\
X15/\,--
o\
\
p,j�ELOP�jFN��
LICENSE
C-2743
-I" "11<RTy CARO.\ PG.
/GH,
a SEAL r
/
GINE , • \\\
g1 It \\�
AUGUST 15, 2019
- 1 \0 \ \\ \
\\\\_-0.4T
,I \
NSANITARY SEWER -0.
27 _ - EASEMENTTN O -
- - -- -- za
\ \ ✓
\ \
\
...:,.:,t _tCBU
Tj
- 1 1 \ 1 ,
W
I S.:. « . � l
/ _ _ _ \\ \ \ �x \ _ - 295 1 \ \ -
_ _ - 1 L-
\
CB506
/ jr \ S \ ( \ \ - t \ l l l \ \ m L \ -�_ U \- \ _ ---- W W \ U) I -I QOM
- �\ - tY Lm _ zz
/ , I I I I\_\ \ \ to ] �� \ \ \ \ \ LO \ 8+00 - _ 3 0 �' _ _ - _ _ - - - - to -
I _WI 1 N \\v-2 ; y _ _3 0Lo \ \ 5+00 +_ x U
\ I I I ' I I I �--------- - \ \ 90 \ \ ! \ \ - \ \-\ \ X� Cn ���
CB502 \ \ 15" RCP - ----- -
\ LU
Z MQM
I r I I \ I I I I I 1--- �� --_ - hO 24in' 1 o
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ .• _ 310 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ _ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ C) U
28 \ \ 2 S \ \ \ \ \ \ H ^
Q
_ U
I \ \ c' 9556.67 S6 ItT. _ _ _ _ // - _ _ - -Ei f�IEATED \ <-\ FES601 _ \ \ - _ _ _ \ di \ _ d di \ ` U
� - ( _ \ - \ \ \ \ \ iRGnnA \ \ \ ea a e� {�� a� a a� a��- �� ��.� r, 0A4 7
r
1
1
I
I
I
1
I 1 1♦ 1 -
IT� lam- < r-
\\\ \ \ I I II ( I 1 I I I 1 1 I I 05,
/ �/J ) / / / \ /310- �� ---
15 PERIMETER
BUFFER, (TYP.) --
1 1 1 1 r 1 1 I I I�� _\-
\ 11 I 1� 1 1 1 1 1 11 111 11 II 1 1 1 1 I/ I IJ I I I I/ I / ) I � -
RE O AT
W[
) \` L 3:1 .
F-
0 f
\\\\\ \ \ \\\\ \\ \\ \\\ \\\\\ \ l I l I I\
\
STORM STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE #
TOP
STRUCTURE HEIGHT
DESCRIPTION
CB501
306.90
11.80'
Curb Inlet
CB502
310.60
9.60'
Curb Inlet
CB503
325.20
9.70'
Curb Inlet
CB504
335.25
7.95'
Curb Inlet
CB505
335.25
5.60'
Curb Inlet
CB506
325.20
7.10'
Curb Inlet
-VV60DSLINE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \ t ` - - _ �\ }\ \� \ \ \ \ �--------
--- - - -
-------
/ - - - -315-
=D STREAM
IE BOTTOM;
IDE SLOPE)
r r
/ JAMES C. 7
DEBRA Tl
I I DBS 803; PI
/ r
f
\ L
STORM PIPE TABLE
PIPE #
DIA
FROM - TO
UPSTREAM
DOWNSTREAMINVERT INVERT
SLOPE
LENGTH
DESCRIPTION
50OA-501
18"
CB501 - JB500A
295.10
294.10
5.08%
19.67 LF
18" RCP
501-502
18"
CB502 - CB501
301.00
297.10
3.80%
102.74 LF
18" RCP
502-503
15"
CB503 - CB502
315.50
303.00
4.07%
306.93 LF
15" RCP
503-504
15"
CB504 - CB503
327.30
317.00
4.08%
252.15 LF
15" RCP
503-506
15"
CB506 - CB503
318.10
317.20
3.40%
26.50 LF
15" RCP
504-505
15"
CB505 - CB504
329.65
328.30
5.10%
26.48 LF
15" RCP
W
i y �
DELWEA7I=�-! -\�-- ,\�_-- � I 1 W v I
� / .•. _ - � \ �" �_ -' _ � ..- �� \ \ / v �• .� - � \ W.IIS
"ORS
6 DELINEATED
•325 - - /WETLANDS
- - - - I
1 f `/ -\I/ ��� \�, -1 , \\\' \ ��_ \ \ \✓✓rte /-- ^rr-J- \� /' / .� \ �\ \/L
GRADING LEGEND
250
252
250
252
TP
LD
ca
■
250.60
TC
250.00
STORM DRAINAGE
WOODED AREA
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
EASEMENT LINE
SILT FENCE/TREE PROTECTION FENCE
LIIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
FLARED END SECTION
CATCH BASIN
DROP INLET
JUNCTION BOX
SPOT ELEVATION
TOP OF CURB
ELEVATIONS
ADDRESS: 1304 N. RESPESS STREET, WASHINGTON, N.C. 27889 EMAIL: [e-mail] Phone: [phone]
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH HARNETT COUNTY AND NCDOT STANDARDS,
SPECIFICATIONS, AND DETAILS.
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE = 19.00 AC.
c�)
00
0
Q
Z
SCALE 1"=40'
NOR
0 40' 80'
HARNETT COUNTY PROJECT #:
7/21/19:
REVISE GRADING, GRADING,
SANITARY SEWER, ADJUST LOT 27
08/15/2018:
REVISE GRADING AT CUL-DE-SAC,
STORM DRAINAGE, WATERLINE
DATE: MAY 16, 2019
ISSUED FOR: REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DRAWINGS
GRADING
PLAN
C 2.3
DRAWN BY: SBT CHECKED BY: SBT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CAROLINA LAND DEVELOPMENT