20140189 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_20191015

ID#* 20140189
Select Reviewer:*
Mac Haupt
Initial Review
Completed Date
10/15/2019
Mitigation Project Submittal - 10/15/20 6
Version* 1
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? *
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r— Stream W Wetlands r Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Katie Webber
Project Information
Existing 20140189
(DWR) (numbers only no dash)
ID#:*
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Arrington Bridge III
County: Wayne
Document Information
r Yes r
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Existing
Version: (nurnbersonly)
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: AB III _MY4_2019_Monitoring Report.pdf 7.49MB
Rease upload only one RDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Ryan Medric
Signature:

0rs%,,.s
October 15, 2019
Samantha Dailey
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
302 Jefferson St. Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South, Suite 300
Bellaire, TX 77401
RE: Arrington Bridge III Year 4 Monitoring Report (SAW — 2015 — 00360)
Ms. Dailey,
Please find attached the Arrington Bridge III Monitoring Report. All of the wetland gauges met
the hydroperiod success criteria in MY4. Vegetation monitoring was not performed per the
approved mitigation plan. RES plans to supplemental plant the standing water, low stem density
areas in the winter of 2019/2020 with tree species tolerant to extremely wet conditions.
RES is requesting a 5% (1.63 WMU) credit release.
Thank you,
Ryan Medric I Ecologist

ARRINGTON BRIDGE III WETLAND MITIGATION SITE
YEAR 4 MONITORING REPORT
WAYNE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared For:
EBX-Neuse I, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
919-829-9909
Prepared by:
res
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
October 2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND AND ATTRIBUTES........................................................ 1
1.1 Location and Setting............................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives.................................................................................................. 1
1.3 Project Structure..................................................................................................................... 2
1.3.1 Wetland Restoration Type and Approach...................................................................... 2
1.4 Project History, Mitigation Bank Establishment, Contacts and Attribute Data ..................... 3
1.4.1 Project History................................................................................................................ 3
1.4.2 Project Watersheds......................................................................................................... 3
2 SUCCESS CRITERIA................................................................................................................... 4
2.1 Wetland Success Criteria........................................................................................................ 4
2.2 Vegetation Success Criteria.................................................................................................... 4
2.3 Scheduling/Reporting............................................................................................................. 4
3 MONITORING PLAN................................................................................................................... 5
3.1 Visual Assessment Monitoring............................................................................................... 5
3.2 Vegetation.............................................................................................................................. 5
4 Maintenance and Contingency plan ............................................................................................... 6
4.1 Wetlands................................................................................................................................. 6
4.2 Vegetation.............................................................................................................................. 6
5 Monitoring Year 4(MY4).............................................................................................................. 6
5.1 Year 4 Data Collection........................................................................................................... 6
5.1.1 Hydrology.......................................................................................................................6
5.1.2 Vegetation.......................................................................................................................7
5.1.3 Photo Documentation..................................................................................................... 7
5.2 Adaptive Management............................................................................................................ 7
6 REFERENCES...............................................................................................................................8

Appendices
Appendix A. General Tables and Figures
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Information
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Appendix B. Vegetation Data and Site Photos
(Vegetation data was not collected in MY4. MY3 data is included again for reference.)
Table 5. Planted Species Summary
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted Species (Species by Plot)
Vegetation Plot Photos
Year 4 General Condition Photos
Appendix C. Hydrology Data
Table 8. 2019 Rainfall Summary
Table 9. 2019 Max Hydroperiod
Table 10. Summary of Groundwater Monitoring Results
Chart 1. 2019 Groundwater Monitoring Gauge Hydrographs

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 4 Monitoring Report• Wayne County, North Carolina • October 2019
1 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND AND ATTRIBUTES
1.1 Location and Setting
The Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Project is located in Wayne County approximately three
miles southwest of Goldsboro, NC. To access the Site from the town of Goldsboro, travel south on NC
HWY 117, and turn left onto Arrington Bridge Road (NC Highway 581). Turn right onto the dirt
entrance road immediately after crossing the railroad tracks (approximately 0. 15 miles). Turn left after
0.3 miles. In 0.1 miles, follow the left fork to access the northern end of the Site. Following the path to
the right will lead to the middle and southern portions of the Site.
The site is located in the Neuse River Basin within Cataloging Unit 03020201 (NCDWQ sub -basin 03-
04-12). The project is located within the Neuse River Basin (8 -digit USGS HUC 03020201, 14 -digit
USGS HUC 03020201200040.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Project provides numerous ecological and water quality
benefits within the Neuse River Basin. While many of these benefits are limited to the project area,
others, such as pollutant removal and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have more far-reaching
effects. Expected improvements to water quality, hydrology, and habitat are outlined below.
Design Goals and Objectives
Benefits Related to Water Quality
Benefit will be achieved through cattle exclusion and direct removal of fecal inputs, filtering of runoff
Nutrient removal
through wetland areas, the conversion of active cattle pastures to forested wetlands, and improved
denitrification and nutrient uptake through wetland zones.
Runoff filtration
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of buffer areas that will receive and filter runoff,
thereby reducing nutrients and sediment concentrations reaching water bodies downstream.
Benefits to Flood Attenuation
Water storage
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of wetland areas which will infiltrate more water
during precipitation events than under current site conditions.
Improved groundwater
Benefit will be achieved through the increased storage of precipitation in wetland areas, ephemeral
recharge
depressions, and reconnection of existing floodplain. Greater storage of water will lead to improved
infiltration and groundwater recharge.
Benefits Related to Ecological Processes
Restoration of habitats
Benefit will be achieved by restoring riparian wetland habitat to appropriate bottomland hardwood
ecosystem.

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 4 Monitoring Report• Wayne County, North Carolina • October 2019
1.3 Project Structure
Arrington Bridge III Site Project Components — Wetland Mitigation
Mitigation Type
Total Acres
Mitigation Ratio
WMUs
Enhancement
5.80
3:1
1.93
Enhancement Low
6.07
5:1
1.21
Restoration
29.37
1:1
29.37
Non -Wetland Buffer
16.62
N/A
N/A
TOTAL:
57.40
32.51
1.3.1 Wetland Restoration Type and Approach
The Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation project provides 32.51 wetland mitigation units through
a combination of Wetland Restoration and two levels of Wetland Enhancement. The existing pasture
areas on the Site are treated with Wetland Restoration at a credit ratio of 1:1. Wetland Restoration
activities included: plugging the main channel and side ditches, removing fill, and regrading the area
to reconstruct historical contours. A credit ratio of 3:1 was put in place for higher -uplift wetland
enhancement areas, including a drained area of planted cypress, an excavated pond, and forested areas
along the north side of the main ditch. A ratio of 5:1 was put in place for the lower -uplift wetland
enhancement areas, which are primarily along the north side of the main ditch. Both levels of Wetland
Enhancement were treated by enhancing the hydrology and providing long-term protection. This was
accomplished by filling the ditches across the site to raise the water table and restore a more natural
drainage pattern. Additionally, the pond was backfilled with the adjacent spoil pile and planted with
trees and a permanent seed mix. Although this was restored to a wetland, it receives Enhancement
credits at a ratio of 3:1 because the pond was already a jurisdictional feature.
1.3.1.1 Wetland Restoration Summary
The primary wetland restoration activities included:
• The backfilling and stabilizing of the main channelized drainage feature and existing side ditches;
• The fill material on one of the access roads was removed and stabilized to restore the natural flow
pattern, and the pond was backfilled with the adjacent spoil pile;
• Areas of cut and fill were re -graded to create a continuous bottomland wetland system.
Plugging ditches and main channelized drainage feature
Plugging of the main feature and side ditches was accomplished through a combination of backfilling
and the construction of ditch plugs throughout the easement area. Approximately 8,600 linear feet of
open ditch was backfilled within the easement boundary. Ditches are filled, compacted, and graded to
the adjacent floodplain elevation. Typical ditch plugs are 20 feet wide and extend above the top of the
ditch bank elevation a minimum of 6 inches. Plugs are constructed of compacted fill placed in 12 -inch
lifts with the upper 18 inches minimally compacted to allow for plant growth. Plugs are spaced such
that successive plugs are no more than 6 inches in elevation below one another. At the point of departure
from the conservation easement, a headwater -type channel is graded to the existing ditch elevation.
When possible, ditch plugs are constructed using excavated material from the restoration and
construction of wetland pools.
Fill Removal, Pond Backfill, and re rg adin o� fsite
Disturbed soils underlain by hydric soils (as described in the soils report) were graded to allow for a
more natural hydrologic regime and function. Additionally, the fill material on the access roads was
removed to restore the natural flow pattern of the site. The restoration site is very gently sloping (less
than one percent) but does contain approximately three feet of elevation difference across the site.
Several decades of agricultural management and mining operations has eliminated microtopography

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 4 Monitoring Report• Wayne County, North Carolina • October 2019
across the site. As outlined in the soils report located in the Mitigation Plan, approximately 12.6 acres
of the project area is described as disturbed soils having hydric indicators and lacking wetland
hydrology. These included large areas in a lower landscape position located adjacent to visible borrow
pits. The soils in these areas had variable textures that were exhibiting hydric indicators. All of this area
was in pasture and being grazed by cattle. One excavated pond is backfilled with soil from the adjacent
spoil pile. The filled pond is considered enhancement due to the jurisdictional status of the existing
open water habitat. The entire conservation easement was disked to break up the plow layer, increase
surface roughness, and promote infiltration.
1.3.1.2 Proposed Wetland Hydrology
The Arrington Bridge III Mitigation Site was once a Cypress Gum Swamp wetland subject to prolonged
inundation as indicated by soils mapping, historical aerial photography, and personal communication
with landowners. By 1974, the area was cleared, much of the borrow removed, and conversion of area
to agricultural production was occurring. The ditch system was mostly in place. The restoration plan
for the site consisted of filling and stabilizing ditches, converting active pasture to a bottomland wetland
system, restoring bottomland hardwood forests, and enhancing the hydrology of existing wetlands. The
backfilling and plugging of ditches lengthens wetland hydroperiods by halting artificial subsurface
drainage and preventing rapid surface drainage. Periodic flooding is vital to sustain plants and wildlife
characteristic of riverine wetlands (Ainslie, 2002). The drainage area for the project area is
approximately 0.63 square miles. The restored wetlands have a variable flooding regime due to the
small size of the drainage area
1.4 Project History, Mitigation Bank Establishment, Contacts and Attribute Data
1.4.1 Project History
The Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site was restored by EBX Neuse I, LLC (EBX). EBX is
an entity of Resource Environmental Solutions LLC (RES). Tables 2, 3, and 4 (Appendix A) provide a
time sequence and information pertaining to the project activities, history, contacts, and baseline
information. EBX, acting as the Bank Sponsor, established a Conservation Easement (CE) and will
monitor the Site for a minimum of seven years. The Mitigation Plan provides detailed information
regarding bank operation, including long term management and annual monitoring activities. The Bank
Sponsor has conveyed the CE to the long-term land steward, the North Carolina Wildlife Habitat
Foundation (NCWHF). The Bank Sponsor will ensure that the conveyed CE will allow for the
implementation of an initial monitoring phase, which will be developed during the design phase and
conducted by the Bank Sponsor. The conveyed CE will allow for yearly monitoring and, if necessary,
maintenance of the Site during the yearly monitoring phases. These activities will be conducted in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the Neu -Con Wetland and Stream Umbrella Mitigation
Bank made and entered into by EBX, USACE, and NCDWR.
1.4.2 Project Watersheds
The easement totals 57.40 acres with one unnamed tributary entering the easement and draining into a
channelized wetland ditch, which runs the length of the easement. The total drainage area at the
downstream limits of the project is 403 acres (0.63 mi2). The land use in the project watershed is
approximately 41 percent cultivated cropland, 18 percent pasture, 16 percent forested, eight percent
residential, eight percent commercial, and seven percent managed open space.

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 4 Monitoring Report• Wayne County, North Carolina • October 2019
2 SUCCESS CRITERIA
The success criteria for the Arrington Bridge III Site follows accepted and approved success criteria
presented in the North Carolina Wetland Mitigation Guidelines and subsequent agency guidance.
Specific success criteria components are presented below.
2.1 Wetland Success Criteria
2.1.1 Wetland Hydrology Criteria
The Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) has a current WETS table for Wayne County
upon which to base a normal rainfall amount and average growing season. The closest comparable data
station was determined to be WETS station NC713 Goldsboro S Johnson AFB. This station is located
at the Seymour Johnson Air Force Base approximately 1.5 miles east of the proposed mitigation site.
The growing season for Wayne County is 262 days long, extending from March 4 to November 21, and
is based on a daily minimum temperature greater than 28 degrees Fahrenheit occurring in five of ten
years.
Because of the surface roughing and shallow depressions, a range of hydroperiods and inundation is
expected. The hydrology success criterion for the site is to restore the water table at the site so that it
will remain continuously within 12 inches of the soil surface for at least eight percent of the growing
season (approximately 21 days) at each groundwater gauge location.
Restoration and enhancement wetland gauge data is compared to reference wetland gauge data in
growing seasons with less than normal rainfall. In periods of low rainfall, if a restoration gauge
hydroperiod exceeds the reference gauge hydroperiod, and both exceed five percent of the growing
season, then the gauge will be deemed successful. If a gauge location fails to meet these success criteria
in the seven year monitoring period, then monitoring may be extended, remedial actions may be
undertaken, or the limits of wetland restoration will be determined.
2.2 Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the wetland areas on the site follows
IRT Guidance. Vegetation monitoring plots are a minimum of 0.02 acres in size, and cover a minimum
of two percent of the planted area. Vegetation monitoring occurs annually in the fall of each year. The
measures of vegetative success for the site vary based on the planting zones outlined in the mitigation
plan.
The interim measures of vegetative success for the planted areas in the site is the survival of at least
320 planted three-year old trees per acre at the end of Year 3 and 260 five-year old trees per acre at the
end of Year 5. The final vegetative success criteria is the survival of 210 trees per acre at the end of
Year 7 of the monitoring period.
Survival is determined at the plot level, not averaged at the site level. No areas are planted with more
than 50 percent of one species comprising the total composition. In addition, planted vegetation should
show a general trend toward successful establishment of the target communities with vigor and height
growth. Specific height criteria are not specified due to the variability of species and site conditions.
2.3 Scheduling/Reporting
The Bank Sponsor follows the guidance document published by NC DMS, "Monitoring Requirements
and Performance Standards for Stream and/or Wetland Mitigation" dated November 7, 2011 and the
2003 USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines. Due to the fact that this project is a private mitigation

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 4 Monitoring Report• Wayne County, North Carolina • October 2019
bank and not an NC DMS project, monitoring documents follow DMS guidelines only to the extent
necessary for IRT approval. A monitoring report will be generated by December 31st of each
monitoring year documenting activities of the site, and submitted to the IRT. The monitoring program
is implemented to document system development and progress toward achieving the success criteria.
The monitoring program will be undertaken for seven years or until the final success criteria are
achieved, whichever is longer.
3 MONITORING PLAN
Annual monitoring data is reported using the IRT monitoring template. The monitoring report provides
a project data chronology that facilitates an understanding of project status and trends, research
purposes, and assists in decision making regarding project close-out. The success criteria for the
Arrington Bridge III site follows current accepted and approved success criteria presented in the North
Carolina Wetland Mitigation Guidelines, and subsequent agency guidance. Specific success criteria
components are presented in the table below. Monitoring reports will be prepared annually and
submitted to the IRT.
MonitoringRe uirements
Required
Parameter
Frequem
Yes
Groundwater
Groundwater gauges
Quarterly
Groundwater monitoring gauges
Hydrology
distributed throughout the
with data recording devices will
site
be installed on site; the data will
be installed on site; the data will
be downloaded on a quarterly
basis during the growing season.
Yes
Vegetation
A representative coverage of
Semi-annual
Vegetation will be monitored
planted vegetation area.
using the Carolina Vegetation
Survey CVSprotocols
Yes
Exotic and Nuisance
Semi-annual
Locations of exotic and nuisance
Vegetation
vegetation will be mapped.
Yes
Project Boundary
Semi-annual
Locations of fierce damage,
vegetation damage, boundary
encroachments, etc. will be
mapped
Yes
Wetland Visual
Quarterly
Quarterly visual assessments
3.1 Visual Assessment Monitoring
Visual monitoring of all mitigation areas is conducted a minimum of twice per monitoring year by
qualified individuals. The visual assessments include vegetation density, vigor, invasive species, and
easement encroachments. Digital images are taken at fixed representative locations to record each
monitoring event, as well as any noted problem areas or areas of concern. Results of visual monitoring
are presented in a plan view exhibit with a brief description of problem areas and digital images.
Photographs are used to subjectively evaluate surface hydrology, success of vegetation, and
effectiveness of erosion control measures. A series of photos over time should indicate successional
maturation of vegetation.
3.2 Vegetation
Vegetation monitoring plots will be a minimum of 0.02 acres in size, and cover a minimum of two
percent of the planted area. The following data will be recorded for all trees in the plots: species, height,
planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. Monitoring occurs each year during the monitoring
period. Invasive and noxious species are monitored and controlled so that none become dominant or

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 4 Monitoring Report• Wayne County, North Carolina • October 2019
alter the desired community structure of the site. If necessary, RES will develop a species-specific
control plan. Invasive and noxious species are monitored and controlled so that none become dominant
or alter the desired community structure of the site. Table 6 (Appendix B) provides a success summary
for each vegetation monitoring plot.
4 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY PLAN
All identified problematic areas or areas of concern such as wetland hydrology not meeting success
criteria, erosion/instability, aggradation/degradation, lack of targeted vegetation, and invasive/exotic
species which prevent the site from meeting performance success criteria will be evaluated on a case
by case basis. The USACE will be notified if monitoring or other information indicates that the Bank
Site, or a portion of a Bank Site, is not progressing as anticipated towards meeting the site specific
performance standards as defined in the Mitigation Plan. In such an event the USACE will be provided
with recommendations for adaptive management measures, which may include site modifications,
design changes, revisions to maintenance requirements, and revised monitoring requirements. USACE
approval will be obtained prior to conducting any adaptive management activities.
4.1 Wetlands
Any wetland problem areas which are identified during post construction monitoring activities are
documented and mapped on the Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV) as part of the annual monitoring
report. Wetland problem areas may include wetland hydrology not meeting success criteria. If it is
determined through IRT correspondence that remedial action is required to repair an area, a proposed
work plan will be submitted for remediation.
4.2 Vegetation
Any vegetation problem areas which are identified during post construction monitoring activities are
documented and mapped on the Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV) as part of the annual stream
monitoring report. Vegetation problem areas or areas of concern may include a vegetation plot not
meeting success criteria, invasive species abundance, sparse vegetation areas, etc. If it is determined
through IRT correspondence that remedial action is required to repair an area, a proposed work plan
will be submitted for remediation.
5 MONITORING YEAR 4 (MY4)
The Arrington Bridge III Mitigation Site Year 4 monitoring activities were performed throughout
2019 with the last activity at the beginning of October 2019. All required Year 4 monitoring data is
present below and in the appendices. Data presented shows the site has remained stable throughout
Year 4 and in general is on track to meeting hydrology interim success criteria. Vegetation
monitoring was not required in Year 4 per the approved mitigation plan.
5.1 Year 4 Data Collection
5.1.1 Hydrology
Wetland hydrology is monitored with fifteen automatic recording pressure transducer gauges that have
been installed in representative locations across the wetland restoration areas. Two wetland hydrology
gauges were installed in reference wetland areas. An onsite rain gauge is also installed to document
rainfall events. Monitoring Year 4 wetland hydrology gauge data is documented in Table 9, Appendix
B. Year 4 wetland hydrology data show the site is performing as planned and is trending toward targeted
wetland hydroperiods. During Year 4, wetland hydrology was monitored through October 3. All 15

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 4 Monitoring Report• Wayne County, North Carolina • October 2019
wetland hydrology gauges met the hydrology success criteria of remaining continuously within 12
inches of the soil surface for at least eight percent of the growing season (approximately 21 days). Max
hydroperiods ranged from 21% to 81%. Recorded rainfall data shows the site was below or within
normal limits for six months out of the sampled time. During February, April, and June the site recorded
above average rainfall (Table 8, Appendix B).
5.1.2 Vegetation
Vegetation monitoring was not performed in Year 4 per the approved mitigation plan. Visual
assessments, however, were performed and overall the vegetation is on track to meet success criteria.
The areas noted in Year 3 as low stem density areas are planned to be replanted in the winter of
2019/2020 with species tolerant of extremely wet conditions.
5.1.3 Photo Documentation
Permanent photo point locations are established at each vegetation plot by Resource Environmental
Solutions, LLC staff. Any additional problem areas or areas of concern will also be documented with
a digital photograph during monitoring activities. Digital photographs of the site's condition and
vegetation plots can be found in Appendix B.
5.2 Adaptive Management
In areas of prolonged inundation and poor tree survival RES plans to perform stick plantings of bald
cypress, green ash, black willow, water tupelo, and buttonbush. Stick planting is a method of wetland
tree planting that involves the trimming of roots and inserting bare root or whip stems directly into the
soil. This method is advantageous in inundated soils where planting holes are difficult to establish.

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 4 Monitoring Report• Wayne County, North Carolina • October 2019
6 REFERENCES
Amoroso, J.L., ed. 1999. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina. North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Conner, W.H. and J. W Day. (19 76) Productivity and Composition of a Baldcypress- Water Tupelo Site and a
Bottomland Hardwood Site in a Louisiana Swamp. American Journal of Botany 63 (10): 1354-1364.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater
Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, FWS/OBS-79/31.
U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical
Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
LeGrand, H.E., Jr. and S.P. Hall, eds. 1999. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal Species of
North Carolina. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Peet, RX, Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998), A flexible, multipurpose method for recording vegetation
composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274.
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles and F.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. The University
of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC. 2015. Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Bank, Final
Mitigation Plan. WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC. 2016 Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site, Baseline
Monitoring Report
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Third
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDENR,
Raleigh, NC.
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2002. Regulatory Guidance Letter. RGL No. 02-2, December 24, 2002.
USArmy Corps of Engineers (USAGE), 2013. April 2003 NC Wetland Mitigation Guidelines.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 1974. Soil
Survey of Wayne County, North Carolina.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE). 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W Lichvar,
and C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR -10-20. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Web Soil
Survey; http:lAvebsoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov (September 2014)

Appendix A.
General Tables and Figures
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Information
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View

Appendix A. General Tables and Figures
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site
DWR Project #
USACE Project # SAW -2015-00360
Mitigation Credits
Nitrogen Phosphorous
Stream Ri anan Wetland Non-ri anan Wetland Buffer Nutrient Offset Nutrient Offset
Type
R
RE R
I 1
RE R
RE
Totals
N/A
N/A 29.37
3.14 N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A
Project Components
Project Component -or- Reach
ID
Restoration -
or- Restoration
As -Built Existing Approach Restoration Footage or
Stationing/Location LF Footage/Acreage PI, PII etc. Equivalent Acreage
Mitigation
Ratio
SMUs with
Buffer
Multiplier
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream Riparian Non -riparian Buffer
(linear feet) Wetland Ac. Wetland (square feet)
Upland
(acres)
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration
29.37
Enhancement
5.80
Enhancement 11
Enhancement- Low
6.07
Preservation
BMP Elements
Element
Location Purpose/Function Notes
BR = Bioretention Cell; SF
BMP Elements
= Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond; FS = Filter Strip; S = Grassed
Swale; LS = Level Spreader; NI = Natural Infiltration Area, FB = Forested Buffer

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Activity and Reporting History
Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site
DWR Project #
USACE Project # SAW -2015-00360
Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Mitigation Plan
NA
September 2015
Final Design — Construction Plans
August 2015
August 2015
Construction Completed
May 2016
May 2016
Site Planting Completed
May 2016
May 2016
Baseline Monitoring Document Year 0 Monitoring — baseline
June 2016
July 2016
Year 1 Monitoring
December 2016
March 2017
Year 2 Monitoring
September 2017
September 2017
Year 3 Monitoring
September 2018
September 2018
Year 4 Monitoring
October 2019
October 2019
Year 5 Monitoring
[phone]
Seed Mix Sources
Year 6 Monitoring
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Arbogen, NC Forestry Services Nursery
Year 7 Monitoring
Wetland and Stream Umbrella Bank
EBX Neuse I, LLC
Table 3. Project Contacts
Project Contacts Table
Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site
DWR Project #
USACE Project # SAW -2015-00360
Designer
WK Dickson and Co., Inc.
720 Corporate Center Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
[phone]
Frasier Mullen, PE
Construction Contractor
KBS Earthworks
5616 Coble Church Road
Julian, NC 27283
[phone]
Planting Contractor
H&J Forestry
Matt Hitch
Seeding Contractor
KBS Earthworks
5616 Coble Church Road
Julian, NC 27283
[phone]
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Arbogen, NC Forestry Services Nursery
Bank/Bank SponsorNeu-Con
Wetland and Stream Umbrella Bank
EBX Neuse I, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Project Contact:
Brad Breslow ([e-mail])
Monitoring Performers
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
[phone]
[Project Manager:
Ryan Medric (rmedrickres.us )

Table 4. Project Information
Project Information
Project Name
Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site
County
Wayne
Project Area (acres)
57.40
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35.342895°N -78.009907°W
Proiect Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Coastal Plain
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit 12 -digit
03020201200040
DWQ Sub -basin
03-04-12
Project Drainage Area (acres)
403 Acres

ti
d
a Goldsboro
a Y -
oQ °.
a
a °
i Q
Arrington Bridge III Site
O
l9
-c
} o D
s�
x'• (II
' f
C - J
Legend
- Streams
- ABIII Easement
Waterbody
HUC 03020201200040
�L
Jo hFreon
Fa K* E,:
o'0 I ^'\�I\A \ 1NUser
b
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, incrementlP Gor
NR.CAN, Esri Japan, META, Esri China (Hong Kong�Esri (Thailen
TomTom, Mapmylndia, ©OpenStreetMap contributors, and the Gld
Cbrn,mn pity
Figure
Resource Project Vicinity Map
Environmental Arrington Bridge III Site
Solutions 4
0 0.5 1 2 WAYNE COUNTYMiles Scale: NTS
�—;

Appendix B.
Vegetation Data
(Vegetation data was not collected in MY4. MY3 data is included again for reference.)
Table 5. Planted Species Summary
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted Species (Species by Plot)
Vegetation Plot Photos
Year 4 General Conditions Photos

Appendix B. Vegetation Tables
Table 5. Planted Species Summary
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
Total Stems Planted
Asimina thloba
Pawpaw
Bare Root
500
Betula nigra
River Birch
Bare Root
2,650
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Common Buttonbush
Bare Root
500
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
Bare Root
800
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Bare Root
3,200
Driodendron tulipifera
Tuliptree
Bare Root
3,000
Nyssa aquatica
Water Tupelo
Bare Root
2,200
Nyssa b flora
Swamp Blackgum Tupelo
Bare Root
5,200
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Bare Root
6,000
Quercus lyrata
Overcup Oak
Bare Root
5,300
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Bare Root
8,500
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Bare Root
6,050
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Bare Root
1,600
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
Bare Root
3,200
Total
48,700

Appendix B. Vegetation Tables
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary (MY3 2018)
Plot #
Planted Volunteer Total
Stems/Acre Stems/Acre Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Stem
Height (ft)
1
809
40
850
Yes
4.0
2
971
121
1093
Yes
5.1
3
445
0
445
Yes
1.6
4
243
0
243
No
2.3
5
202
0
202
No
1.4
6
405
40
445
Yes
1.7
7
364
121
486
Yes
1.8
8
283
0
283
No
2.8
9
607
0
607
Yes
3.1
10
526
162
688
Yes
2.6
11
567
0
567
Yes
3.9
12
971
405
1376
Yes
3.8
13
121
0
121
No
3.2
14
809
22258
23067
Yes
6.0
15
769
10117
10886
Yes
4.0
16
809
2145
2954
Yes
4.5
17
688
40
728
Yes
2.4
18
607
81
688
Yes
2.3
19
486
81
567
Yes
2.0
20
364
4249
4613
Yes
2.6
21
283
0
283
No
2.4
22
1214
5706
6920
Yes
4.5
23
688
2064
2752
Yes
3.3
24
243
6070
6313
No
2.3
25
364
0
364
Yes
2.0
26
769
11129
11898
Yes
1.8
27
486
0
486
Yes
1.7
Project Avg
559
2401
2960
Yes
3.3

Appendix B. Vegetation Tables
Table 7: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species (NIY3 2018)
Arrington Bridge III
Current Plot Data (MY32018)
Current Plot Data (MY32018)
Annual Means
00002-01-0001
00002-01-0002
00002-01-0003
00002-01-0004
00002-01-0005
00002-01-0006
00002-01-0007
00002-01-0008
00002-01-0009
00002-01-0010
00002-01-0011
00002-01-0012
00002-01-0013
MY3(2018)
MY2(2017)
00002-01-0020
MY1(2016)
00002-01-0022
MYO(2016)
00002-01-0024
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
PnoLS P -all
T
PnoLS P -all T
MY1(2016)
PnoLS P -all T
MYO(2016)
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
PnoLS P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
Acerrubrum
red maple
Tree
1
550
3
250
50
4
1
100
1359
340
50
150
Asiminatriloba
pawpaw
Tree
100
1359
340
Asiminatriloba
pawpaw
Tree
2
2
2
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1 1
1
2
2
5 5
5
3 3
3
river birch
Tree
10
29
29
214
28
28
48
34
34
34
36
36
36
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
2 2
40
1
1
2
2 2
2
2
2
2
1 1
126
29
29
214
28
28
48
34
34
34
36
36
36
Cerciscanadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
Cornusamomum
silkydogwood
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
7
Cornusamomum
silkydogwood
Shrub
Diospyrosvirginiana
Icommon persimmon Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
DONTKNOW: unsure record
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
11
1
45
45
45
182
182
182
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
4
4
1 1
4
10 10
10
2 2
2
7 7
7
4 4
4
5 5
5
8 8
8
1 1
1
4
4
4
90
90
94
91
91
91
91
91
91
101
101
101
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
11
1
1
45
45
45
182
182
182
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
4
4
4
8 8
8
1
1
1
6 6
6
54
2
2
3 3
3
4
4
4
Liriodendrontulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
3
3
3
4 4
4
9 9
9
90
90
94
91
91
91
91
91
91
101
101
101
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
1
29
29
29
38
38
38
Nyssaaquatica
watertupelo
Tree
3
50
54
2
Liriodendrontulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
Nyssabiflora
swamptupelo
Tree
3
3
3
1 1
1
2 2
2
3 3
3
2 2
2
4 4
4
1 1
1
5 5
5
9
9
9
2 2
2 51
51
51
60
60
60
93
93
93
96
96
96
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore Tree
3
3
3
71 71
7
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
4 4
41
1
1
1
1
49
49
49
50
50
50
97
97
97
91
91
91
Quercus
oak
Tree
I
5
5
5
I
I
1
1 1
1
2 2
2
1 1
1
2
2
2
4 4
4
2
2
2
29
29
29
12
12
12
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
5
5
5
American sycamore
7 7
7
6 6
6
2
1 1
1
1 1
1
7
1
3 3
3
3 3
3
2
2 2
2
1 1
1
4 4
4
5
5
64
64
64
75
75
75
126
126
126
128
128
128
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak Tree
5
5
5
50
97
97
97
91
91
91
Quercus
oak
Tree
2 2
2
3 3
3
10
10
10
38
38
38
47
47
47
98
98
98
86
86
86
Quercus nigra
wateroak
Tree
1
2
2
2
29
29
29
12
12
12
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
51 51
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
2 2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
13
13
13
11
11
11
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
3 3
3
2
4 4
4
3 3
3
64
64
64
75
1 1
1
126
126
126
128
128
1 1
1
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
3 3
3
3
3
20
20
20
22
22
22
46
46
46
43
43
43
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
5 5
5
3
3
1 1
1
1 1
1
2 2
2
4 4
4
38
38
47
47
47
98
98
98
86
86
86
1 1
1 28
28
28
25
25
25
28
28
28
24
24
24
2 2
2
Stem count
20
20
21
24 24
27
11 11
11
6 6
6
5 5
5 10 10
11
9 9
12
7 7
7 15 15
15
13 13
17
14 14
14
24
24
34
3 3
3 373
373
1975
406
406
774
737
737
737
849
849
849
willow oak
Tree
size (ares)
1
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8 8
1
1
1
1
1
1
27
27
20
27
20
22
27
22
46
46
size (ACRES)
431
0.02
43
Taxodium distichum
0.02
ITree
0.02
1
1
0.02
1 0.02
0.02
0.02
5
0.02
0.02
1
1 1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
4
1 0.02
0.67
2 2
0.67
0.67
0.67
28
Species count
6
6
6
25
6 6
6
2
2
2
24
4 4
4
Stem count
3 3
3
3 3
4
269
3 3
4
2 2
2
4 4
4
15
4 4
5
14
5 5
5
4
4
5
2 2
2 11
11
13
13
13
15
16
16
16
13
13
13
12
373
Stems per ACRE
809
809
850
774
971
1093
737
445
445
849
243
243
size (ares)
202 202
1
405
445
1
364
486
283 2231 283
1
6071
607
1
S261
688
5671
5671
9711
9711
13761
1211 1211 121
SS91
2960
6091 1160
1
11051 11051
12731
12731 1273
Arrington Bridge III
Current Plot Data (MY32018)
Annual Means
00002-01-0014
00002-01-0015
00002-01-0016
00002-01-0017
00002-01-0018
00002-01-0019
00002-01-0020
00002-01-0021
00002-01-0022
00002-01-0023
00002-01-0024
00002-01-0025
00002-01-0026
00002-01-0027
MY3(2018)
MY2(2017)
MY1(2016)
MYO(2016)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
Acerrubrum
red maple
Tree
1 1
550
250
50
1
100
100
50
150
100
1359
340
Asiminatriloba
pawpaw
Tree
2
2
2
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
3
1
7
7
8
1 1
2
4 4
9
2 2
40
1
1
2
2 2
2
2
2
2
1 1
126
29
29
214
28
28
48
34
34
34
36
36
36
Cerciscanadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
Cornusamomum
silkydogwood
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon
Tree
4
4
4
DONTKNOW: unsure record
11
1
1
45
45
45
182
182
182
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
4
4
4
8 8
8
1
1
1
6 6
6
2 2
2
3 3
3
4
4
4
1 1
1
3
3
3
4 4
4
9 9
9
90
90
94
91
91
91
91
91
91
101
101
101
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
1
3
50
54
2
Liriodendrontulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
29
29
29
38
38
38
Nyssaaquatica
watertupelo
Tree
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
4 4
4
5
5
5
1 1
1
2 2
2
1 1
1
2
2
2
4 4
4
51
51
51
60
60
60
93
93
93
96
96
96
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
6 6
6
2
2
2
7
7
7
1
1
1
2 21
2
2 2
2
4 4
4
5
5
5
1 1
4 4
4
49
49
49
50
50
50
97
97
97
91
91
91
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
2
2
2
29
29
29
12
12
12
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
51 51
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
2 2
2
4
4
4
1 1
1
2 2
2
8 8
8
3
31
3
1 1
1
2
2
2
4 4
4
3 3
3
64
64
64
75
75
75
126
126
126
128
128
128
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
3 3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
2
2
2
1 1
1
3
3
3
2 2
2
38
38
38
47
47
47
98
98
98
86
86
86
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
2 2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
13
13
13
11
11
11
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
5
5
5
8 8
8
1
1
1
20
20
20
22
22
22
46
46
46
431
43
43
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
ITree
1 1
1
5 5
5
1 1
1
3 3
3
4 4
4
2 2
2
28
28
28
25
25
25
28
28
28
241
24
24
Stem count
20 20
570
19
19
269
20
20
73
17 17
18
15
15
17
12 12
14
9 9
114
7 7
7
30 30
171
17
171
68
61 61
156
9
9
9
19 19
294
121 12
12
373
373
1975
406
406
774
737
737
737
8491
8491
849
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
27
27
27
27
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
Species count
6 6
7
5
5
6
5
5
7
4 4
5
5
5
6
6 6
7
4 4
5
3 3
3
7 7
9
6
6
7
4 4
5
4
4
4
6 6
8
2 2
2
11
11
13
13
13
15
16
16
16
13
13
13
Stems per ACRE
809 23067
7691
769 10886
8091
8091
2954
6881
7281
6071
6071
688M
4861
56
3641
4613
2831
283
12141
69201
6881
6881
2752
2431
63131
3641
3641
364M
7691118981
= 4861
486
SS91
29601
6091
6091 1160
11051 1105
1273
1273 1273

Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Photos
Appendix B.
Arrington Bridge III Vegetation Plot Photos (NIY3 2018)
Vegetation Plot 1(8/21/2018)
Vegetation Plot 2 (8/21/2018)
Vegetation Plot 3 (8/21/2018)
Vegetation Plot 4 (8/21/2018)
Vegetation Plot 5 (8/21/2018)
Vegetation Plot 6 (8/21/2018)

Vegetation Plot 7 (8/21/2018)
Vegetation Plot 9 (8/21/2018)
Vegetation Plot 11(8/21/2018)
Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 8 (8/21/2018)
Vegetation Plot 12 (8/21/2018)

Vegetation Plot 13 (8/21/2018)
Vegetation Plot 15 (8/22/2018)
Vegetation Plot 17 (8/22/2018)
Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 14 (8/22/2018)
Vegetation Plot 16 (8/22/2018)
Vegetation Plot 18 (8/22/2018)

Vegetation Plot 19 (8/22/2018)
Vegetation Plot 21(8/22/2018)
Vegetation Plot 23 (8/22/2018)
Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 20 (8/22/2018)
Vegetation Plot 22 (8/22/2018)
Vegetation Plot 24 (8/22/2018)

Vegetation Plot 25 (8/22/2018)
Vegetation Plot 27 (8/22/2018)
Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 26 (8/22/2018)

Arrington Bridge III General Conditions Photos
General Conditions Photo (7/31/2019)
Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Photos
General Conditions Photo (10/3/2019)

Appendix C.
Hydrology Data
Table 8. 2019 Rainfall Summary
Table 9. 2019 Max Hydroperiod
Table 10. Summary of Groundwater Monitoring Results
Chart 1. 2019 Groundwater Monitoring Gauge Hydrographs

Table 8. 2019 Rainfall Summary
Month
Average
Normal Limits
30 Percent 70 Percent
Goldsboro
Station
January
4.64
3.56
5.37
3.95
February
3.67
2.47
4.28
5.52
March
4.55
3.28
5.53
5.31
April
3.45
2.15
4.31
7.40
May
3.87
2.65
4.83
2.93
June
4.03
2.51
4.94
7.15
July
5.34
3.51
6.38
6.14
August
5.52
3.49
6.34
3.66
Septem ber
5.57
2.43
7.40
4.13
October
3.10
1.99
4.39
---
Novem ber
3.01
1.94
3.65
---
Decem ber
3.44
2.28
4.25
---
Total
50.19
32.26
61.67
46.19
Notes:
Goldsboro CRONOS Database - Cherry Research Station (GOLD)
Table 9.
2019 Max Hydroperiod (Growing Season 4 -Mar through 21 -Nov, 262 days)
Well Data for March 4, 2019 thru October 3, 2019
Success Criterion 8%
Gauge
Consecutive
Cumulative
Occurrences
Percent of
Days growing
Season
Percent of
Days growing
Season
AW1
54.5
21%
74.5
28.4%
8
AW2
127.5
49%
203.0
77.5%
4
AW3
1 127.5
49%
228.5
87.2%
5
AW4
213.5
81%
213.5
81.5%
1
AW5
91.5
35%
206.0
78.6%
4
AW6
127.5
49%
199.0
76.0%
5
AW7
120.5
46%
194.5
74.2%
5
AW8
79.5
30%
120.5
46.0%
7
AW9
213.5
81%
213.5
81.5%
1
AWN
121.5
46%
204.0
77.9%
5
AWI1
128.5
49%
209.0
79.8%
4
AW12
90.5
35%
181.5
69.3%
6
AW13
84.5
32%
152.5
58.2%
9
AW14
78.5
30%
144.0
55.0%
7
AW15
128.5
49%
204.0
77.9%
4
REFAW1
213.5
81%
213.5
81.5%
1
REFAW2
62.5
24%
77.0
29.4%
4

Table 10.
Summary of Groundwater Monitoring Results
Arrington B ride III
Gauge ID
Percent of Growing
Season; Success Criteron 8%
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
(2016) (2017) (2018)
Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
(2019) (2020) (2021) (2022)
AW1
18%
10%
5%
21°
AW2
12%
71%
43%
49%
AW3
38%
59%
39%
49%
AW4
31%
71%
41%
81%
AW5
31%
59%
44%
35%
AW6
43%
59%
42%
49%
AW7
31%
71%
44%
46%
AW8
24%
50%
39%
30%
AW9
24%
71%
41%
81%
AW10
26%
57%
40%
46%
AW11
31%
58%
41%
49%
AW12
31%
71%
43%
35%
AW13
31%
18%
41%
32%
AW14
31%
55%
45%
30%
AW15
18%
59%
24%
49%
REFAW1
31%
59%
43%
81%
REFAW2
17%
19%
22%
24%

Chart 1. 2018 Groundwater Monitoring Gauge Hydrographs
2019 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW1
20 10.0
Growing Season
9.0
10
8.0
_
�
w
=
6.02
t7
C -10
i7
---^----
^----- —
--- ---
---:
--
---------
d
W
—
JS
R
a
4.0 �
c
R
3
30
3.0
20
-40
1.0
-60 .l I !!. _ t 1 l I 1 J. 4. I ial t a°
J F I•.1 r. I•.1 .. J A 5 O N D
Months
id Dsyftgm AWAW1
2019 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW2
20 10.0
Growing Season
9.0
8.0
r
�
C
N
�
6.0m
_____--_—
________________________------------------
____
C
7
H
5.0 ❑
w
-
Fy
a
4.0Z
-20
3
a
�
L
a
3.0
20
da
1.0
5a
0.0
J F M A M J J A s O N D
Months
�OtlCeouo DaNy RaIMiA �A&11 AW2

2019 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW3
za 1°.°
Growing Season
8.0
19
&0
°
Q
r
7.0
Q
C
N
C
fi.fl
Q .10
R—
V
C
— — — — — — —
m
LU
-z0
a
a
d0 `
3
3.0
{} -30
20
AD
1.0
50
0.0
J F M A M J J A S 0 N D
Months
�ciopffifwa oay RaaYaN —aan Aws
2019 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW4
20 1o.0
GrovAi
ig Season
90
10
&°
°
7.0
t
Q
Q
&o=
V
:I -10
.
=
7
Q
5.0
w
.2
—
a
-20
4.0 d
3
a
Q
s5 x
so
20
-40
1.0
-60 &°
J F ki A M J J A S 0 N D
Months
�GtlUE6ao nary RsnTall ABIIAwa

2018 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW6
2018 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW5
za
1o.a
Growing Season
F7
Growing Season
a.o
+a
9.0
10
sD
80
m °
7.D
r
70
t
V
v
=
c
C
O
N
&Q
C
O .1Q
_
S.Dz
-10
I --------
----------- ---
-----------------
— — — —
c
—
m
5,00
W
50p
w
a
-20
—
d
-20
AO
3
R%
0.0
a
m,y
30
c7 -a0
0.
=
O
3.D
0 -30
z°
20
A0
1Q
II
_Sp ■l 1,tillL
Q 0
J F
m A M J J A 5 0 N
D
Months
m=mC-udMm DaNy Ralnlan-ABIIIAWr
2018 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW6
20 10.0
Growing Season
9.0
10
80
0
70
t
V
=
N
&Q
C
O .1Q
_
V
_
--------------------------
a
d
5,00
W
a
-20
AO
3
a
30
c7 -a0
z°
-40
1.0
0.0
-50
3 F M A M J J A 5 0 N D
Months
I AGO EaEdO Day Ra MaA-A&IIANK

2018 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW8
2098 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW7
24
10.0
Growing Season
F
F7
8.4
10:
9.0
10
S0
0 4
d
L
V
7.0
80
0
80 4)
V
-10
R-------
--------- — — --
--
--
m
t
m
7.0
V
C
=
.7—
s.o 0
w
d
N
—
-20
--�—
_
'V
7 R —
°f
— — — — — —
------------ --
---
—
--- --�--
5 4 G
w
3.4
—
Q
,d. -20
c
2.0
4.0Z
C
tl
3
O
3.0
S7 -30
20
-40
1.0
-50
D.0
J
F M A M J J A S 0 N
n
Months
0.0
�Od0 OallyPAnw Aemmn
Months
2018 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW8
20 10.0
Growing Season
9.0
10
S0
0 4
d
L
V
7.0
C
=
D
80 4)
V
-10
R-------
--------- — — --
--
--
---------------
m
.7—
s.o 0
w
d
G
-20
40 `
3
a
e
3.4
2.0
-4o
1.0
0.0
-50
J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0
Months
��deuorowity Ranror-Aeiu�we

2018 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW10
20 10.0
Growing Season
ao
10
&0
Q 0 7.0
t
v
= N
C S-0=
a -10 U
m— — — — — — — --------------- --- —--------- ----
a
d 5.0 D
Uj
�3 -20 a
R
Ra-
? 4.0 U
� a
C7
so
-30
2,0
40
1.0
50 0.0
J F M A M J J A 5 O M D
Months
CMM xODsyRaWml ABIIIAWEO

2018 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW12
2018 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW11
30
-
10.0
Growing Season
Growing Season
a.0
20
8.0
25
&0
w 10
N
70
L
V
C
N
=
B-0 t
iv
c
—
a
m
V
C
s.o 0
w
`m
y^
-
a
-10
60M
C
�
3
---------- ---
---------
-----
4 -Oa
C
C
C
a`
0
(D
3 0
-20
W
a.o
500
01
-30
n
-5
1.0
-40
all C I 1 4 11
0.0
J
F M A M J J A S O N
O
Months
d
�(i01dd00fOO�JiF�Y� ABIIIAW11
2018 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW12
35 10.0
Growing Season
8.0
25
60
15
70
L
V
C
y^
60M
C
�
5
C
a
d
W
500
01
n
-5
4.0')
d
c
a
_
�
- - - - - - -
----------- --
---
----------
----
3.0
[7 -15
20
-25
7.0
UW35
0.0
J F M A M J J A s ❑ N D
Months
as Gditwo a�gaanrm—AeroAwrz

201$ Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW14
2018 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW13
05
1a.o
Growing Season
8.0
25
8.0
&0
5
N
m
30
7.0
v
=
7.0
N
�
V
�
5
v
_
C
c
—
m
=
R
5.0 C0
LLI
V
7
W
—
1
—
'O.
.d. -5
m
a
4.0 m
=
4
a
— — — — — — — ---------- — -- --
'-'---- ------
----'
3.0
C7 -15
3.0
2.0
-25
l
1.0
05 .
II
all I- 1 4 L.
0.0
J
F M A M J J A S O N
0
Months
�CMW anoalyRWM —AeuAMS
-30 1.0
201$ Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW14
50
10.0
Growing Season
8.0
8.0
30
7.0
20
V
�
_
C
N
6.0 t
0 10
=
R
V
7
W
56 p
w
—
a
4.0 m
3
a
-10
-------
---------— — — --
--
— — -----
3.0
-20
20
-30 1.0
-40 . L � 0.0
J F M A M J J A 5 O N O
Months
�GWSWe DVYRanraa —aan Aw+a

2018 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW15
20 10.0
Growing Season
9.0
10
S.0
07.
m
L
IN7.0
U
C
c&
O
N
0.1c
-70
C
d
—
50Q
W
—
a
-2o
d.0 0
3
a
0
3-D
ii -30
20
-40
1.0
50
0.0
J F M A M J J A S O N ❑
Months
�GdOmuf Mlrf RmnrA A&IIAW15
2018 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge REFAW1
20 10.0
Growing Season
9.0
10
80
m 0
7.0
Z
U
C
o
8-0 z
-�o
C
a
m
s.o 0
w
-
J' -20
a
r
c a
'a
0 -30 3 0
a0
-40
to
I
-50 ill l.. 0.0
J F M A M J J A S O N ❑
Months
�6doaodn DmyRanfa A&IIREFAWI

2018 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge REFAW2
zo
10.0
Growing Season
9.0
10
&0
w
W
t
U
0
7.0
c
_
O
&0
-10
---____
_______ ____ ___ _______ _________
7
as
&0 O
W2
`m
a
-20
a0
U
c
d
°
a0
t7
-30
20
�0
7.0
5o
Q0
J
F M A M J J A S O N O
Months
�GdCa D*R*Am-RBIIREFAM