WQ0003919_Staff Report_20191015

State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
To: ❑ NPDES Unit ® Non -Discharge Unit
Attn: Ranveer Katyal
From: Will Hart
Washington Regional Office
Application No.: WQ0003919
Facility name: City of Kinston RLAP
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge fg acili , staff report to document the review of both non -
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are gpplicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No
a. Date of site visit: September 27, 2019
b. Site visit conducted by: Will Hart
c. Inspection report attached? ❑ Yes or ® No
d. Person contacted: N A and their contact information: (_) - ext.
e. Driving directions: _
2. Discharge Point(s): N/A
Latitude:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: N/A
Classification: N/A
River Basin and Subbasin No. N/A
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: MN/A
II. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
ORC: Certificate #: Backup ORC: Certificate #:
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
Description of existing facilities:
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow:
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important
for the permit writer to know (i.e., equipment condition, function, maintenance, a change in facility ownership,
etc.)
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Pagel of 3

3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, please explain:
I t . Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ® Yes or ❑ No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: Review of the Annual Report did not identify any
issues.
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
14. Check all that apply:
® No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑ Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV, NOD, etc.)
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, please explain:
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes ®No❑N/A
If yes, please explain:
16. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: N/A
17. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 3

III. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
2. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
® Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
❑ Issue
❑ Deny (Please state reasons: )
3. Signature of report preparer:
Signature of regional supervisor:
10/15/2019
Date:
WV H441
P444i To.y ma
IV. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
The permittee requests to delete nine application fields in Craven and Greene Counties. An inspection of those fields
was performed prior to release from the land application program. The firelds were added to the permit during the
previous permit cycle. Visual inspection found them suitable for release.
BIMS is flagging violations for Late/Missing GW-59's since the most recent renewal. There is no groundwater
monitoring associated with this permit. The current permit does not contain an Attachment C.
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 3

Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id: 175D54E89A7D420C9A15AB60F7FD428C
Subject: WQ0003919StaffReport10142019
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 3 Signatures: 1
Certificate Pages: 2 Initials: 0
AutoNav: Enabled
Envelopeld Stamping: Disabled
Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)
Record Tracking
Status: Original
10/14/2019 11:56:49 AM
Signer Events
Will Hart
[e-mail]
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
In Person Signer Events
Editor Delivery Events
Agent Delivery Events
Intermediary Delivery Events
Certified Delivery Events
Carbon Copy Events
Robert Tankard
[e-mail]
DWR
DEQ
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
Witness Events
Notary Events
Envelope Summary Events
Envelope Sent
Certified Delivered
Signing Complete
Completed
Holder: Will Hart
[e-mail]
Signature
Wa NAa
Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style
Using IP Address: 149.168.204.10
Signature
Status
Status
Status
Status
Status
PIED
Signature
Signature
Status
Hashed/Encrypted
Security Checked
Security Checked
Security Checked
Docu5�".
6 S E C U R E 6
Status: Completed
Envelope Originator:
Will Hart
217 W. Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699
[e-mail]
I Address: 162.248.186.11
Location: DocuSign
Timestamp
Sent: 10/14/2019 11:56:50 AM
Viewed: 10/14/2019 11:56:57 AM
Signed: 10/14/2019 11:58:04 AM
Freeform Signing
Timestamp
Timestamp
Timestamp
Timestamp
Timestamp
Timestamp
Sent: 10/14/2019 11:58:05 AM
Timestamp
Timestamp
Timestamps
10/14/2019 11:58:05 AM
10/14/2019 11:56:57 AM
10/14/2019 11:58:05 AM
10/14/2019 11:58:05 AM

Payment Events Status Timestamps