20191385 Ver 1_CombinedPreJDRequest_W_WilsonAve_20191009

dECOLOGICAL
ENGINEERING
June 13, 2016
Mr. William Elliott
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Re: Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
W. Wilson Ave. Improvements
Mooresville, Iredell County, NC
Mr. Elliott:
1151 SE Cary Parkway, Suite 101
Cary, North Carolina 27518
[phone]
Ecological Engineering, LLP (Ecological Engineering) respectfully requests concurrence with the attached request
for preliminary jurisdictional determination (JD) for the above -referenced project. Ecological Engineering is
currently under contract with Stewart, Inc. (Stewart) to provide natural resources inventories, jurisdictional
assessments and reporting. The road improvement project, which includes addition of sidewalks and a pedestrian
bridge, is located in Mooresville, Iredell County, NC.
The approved preliminary JD will assist in avoidance and minimization of unavoidable wetland or stream impacts
associated with design and layout of the project. We have attached the following information to assist with your
review:
• Jurisdictional Determination Request Forms;
• USGS topographic map, soil survey, aerial imagery, and figures denoting wetlands and streams within the
study area; (NOTE: stream & wetland sketches provided, pending survey data)
• USACE data sheets (wetland and upland);
• USACE stream quality assessment forms;
• NCDWR stream forms;
• Site photographs;
• Agent authorization form
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]. We look forward to
hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, LLP
_D6--
David Cooper
Project Scientist
cc: Andy Young, Stewart, Inc.
Ecological Engineering, LLP Project No. 10502-15G

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info:
1. Project Name W. Wilson Ave. Improvements
2. Narne of Property Owner/Applicant: Town of Mooresville, NC
3. Name of Consultant/Agent: David Cooper - Ecological Engineering, LLP
*Agent authorization needs to be attached.
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): N/A
5. Site Address: multiple
6. Subdivision Name: n/a
7. City: Mooresville, NC
8. County: Iredell
9. Lat: 35.580185 Long: -80•828897 (Decimal Degrees Please)
10. Quadrangle Name: Mooresville
11. Waterway: Reeds Creek
12. Watershed: Reeds Creek - Lake Norman, 03050101150040
13. Requested Action:
Nationwide Permit #
General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
1xFx-]Pre-Application Request IlPreliminary Jurisdictional Determination
The following information will be completed by Corps office:
�
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
Site/Waters Name:
Keywords:

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
® Property Information
Address: Multiple
County: Iredell
Directions: From the Asheville area, follow I-40 east to Statesville, then take
exit 152A for I-77 South toward Charlotte. Continue for 16 miles,
then take exit 35 for Brawley School Road and turn left onto
Brawley School Road. Brawley School Road becomes W. Wilson
Avenue. The study area is along W. Wilson Avenue between US
Hwy. 21 and NC Hwy. 115/Main Street. Roadside parking is
available on the north side of W. Wilson Avenue, east of its
intersection with Bradford Glyn Drive.
Parcel Index Number (PIN): Please refer to table below.
PIN
ACRES
OWNER
MAILING ADDRESS
P O BOX 878
4656490902.000
98.09
TOWN OF MOORESVILLE
MOORESVILLE, NC 28115
118 FOX HOLLOW RD
4657418112.000
0.848
HAY SAMUEL H+MARYSE C
MOORESVILLE, NC 28117
126 FOX HOLLOW RD
4657419220.000
0.715
DRAKE LARRY CRAIG JR+PHILOMENA A
MOORESVILLE, NC 28117
P O BOX 878
4657500988.000
0.47
TOWN OF MOORESVILLE
MOORESVILLE, NC 28115
P O BOX 738
4657512072.000
0.523
HORN CLAUDE RJR ETAL
COOLEEMEE, NC 27014
101 BRADFORD GLYN DR
4657512260.000
1.1414
GANGI MICHAEL+SHANE
MOORESVILLE, NC 28115
P O BOX 878
4657514098.000
0.25
TOWN OF MOORESVILLE
MOORESVILLE, NC 28115
PO BOX 1115
4657601812.000
9.45
RADER ELIZABETH B
MOORESVILLE, NC 28115
NOTE: The above parcels are those which have been identified as having jurisdictional streams or wetlands.
Additional parcels are located within the study area, but do not contain jurisdictional resources.
1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
® Name:
Mailing Address
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address
Select one:
David Cooper
Ecological Engineering, LLP
1151 SE Cary Parkway, Suite 101
Cary, NC 27518
[phone]
[e-mail]
❑ I am the current property owner.
® I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant2
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
® Name: Ryan Rase
Deputy Town Manager, Town of Mooresville
Mailing Address: 413 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address 3: [e-mail]
® Proof of Ownership (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
All work to be performed within Town of Mooresville right-of-way. Please refer to parcel
exhibit below and attached, which shows the only portion of the study area and those parcels
which contain jurisdictional resources.
1 If available
z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available

Jurisdictional Determination Request
.—
Legend
��
!
Streets
'
Study Area
CW's-
Other Project Parcels
RADER
ELIZABETH B
Project Parcels with
Jurisdictional Resources
DRAKE LARRY CRAIG
:: J I • :
JR+PHILOMENAA,
4657419220.000
s �t r
GANGI
MICHAEL+SHANE,
y
+
4657512260.000
�
HAY SAMUEL
H+MARYSE C,
4657418112.000
j
uRaD�Oo'Otvwr
HORN CLAUDE R JR
. o {
ETAL, 4657512072.000
4 TOWN of MOORESVILLE - RADER ELIZABETH B,
4657601812.000
TOWN OF
4
t�
ear _ o
MOORESVILLE,
4656490902.000
HQ -RN r.
DL R Jr LTAL�, ,: , TOWN OF
Gil, U vcH.AFL-SHANE
MOORESVILLE,
4657500988.000
TOWN OF
TOWN
OF MOORESVILLE
MOORESVILLE,
4657514098.000
DRAl<F rARk`tY CRJAIr J,-PWLOlIFNAA
TOWN OF MOORESVILLE
HAY SAMUEL Hs MARYSE C
Fy ....__>F..
NOTE: All work to be performed
Y•,
within Town right-of-way.
Preparectsy:
Prepared For:
Project Parcels with
Jurisdictional Resources
ECOLOGICAL
MENGINEERING
A
W. Wilson Ave. Improvements
Mooresville, Iredell County, INC
�- J
r:
T E
SWA R T
2014 Aerial from NCO -Map.—
100 20
a�
s sa u.,naa.,..x:Q ion a, ncm°.
Map Date: May 27, 21116
r =ova•
3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to
enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and
issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Property Owner (please print)
Ryan Rase, Deputy Town Manager
Town of Mooresville
413 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
® I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS' and provide an approved D for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation. (proceed to F and G
below).
❑ I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved D (this may or may not include a survey plat).
❑ I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved _ID (may or may not
include a survey plat).
° For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USAGE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
® Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
® Size of Property or Project Area: +/- 29 acres total
❑ I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
® Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
® Project Coordinates: see attached tables and figures
Maps (no larger than I Ix17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
® Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
® Aerial Photography of the project area
® USGS Topographic Map
® Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
Wetland Data Sheets
Upland Data Sheets
Landscape Photos, if taken
Tributaries:
® USACE Assessment Forms
® Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
Locations of photo stations
Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.

ATTACHMENT
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
May 27, 2016
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Authorized Agent:
On behalf of:
David Cooper
Ryan Rase
Project Scientist
Deputy Town Manager
Ecological Engineering, LLP
Town of Mooresville
1151 SE Cary Parkway, Suite 101
413 North Main Street
Cary, NC 27518
Mooresville, NC 28115
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO
DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Iredell City: Town of Mooresville
Project Name: W. Wilson Ave. Improvements
Site
Name of nearest
Cowardin
Estimated amount
Class of aquatic
number
waterbody
Latitude
Longitude
Class
of aquatic resource
resource
in study area
Reeds Creek
1
35.579944 ° N
-80.832900 ° W
None
280 If
non -section 10
(Reeds Creek)
2
Stream A (SA)
35.580175 ° N
-80.831468 ° W
None
580 If
non -section 10
3
Stream B (SB)
35.580073 ° N
-80.831250 ° W
None
50 If
non -section 10
4
Stream D (SD)
35.580085 ° N
-80.833042 ° W
None
120 If
non -section 10
5
Wetland A (WA)
35.580085 ° N
-80.831859 ° W
None
<0.01 ac.
wetland
6
Wetland B (WB)
35.580148 ° N
-80.832827 ° W
None
<0.01 ac.
wetland
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters:
Tidal: n/a
Non -Tidal: n/a
1

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 2016-05-02
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States
on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this
preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved
jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other
person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an
approved JD in this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant
is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general
permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree
to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in
reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes
the applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be
processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a
proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other
water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the
United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and
(7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be
processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and
all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional
issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes
necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to
provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an
approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the subject project
site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed
activity, based on the following information:
2

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items
should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference
sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s).
Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 Mooresville, NC.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: NRCS Web Soil Survey & Soil Survey of Iredell County, NC, 2011.
® National wetlands inventory map(s).
Cite name: USFWS online NWI mapper.
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):2014 NCOneMap.
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by
the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
2016-06-13
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the
signature is impracticable)

Legend
Study Area q , OATS rraf
m
7
Riff ps u J `7 �}j p C W
JI
._21
�
0 A
IfA Greer
I -_ l m Acres
15p f( l_ - FLaMDR
rr; - o,
_
aI 17RY6"J �q�
-
r- 0 w
fzcix.s
T
W W1L5
\`Stream A
CABARRUS-AVE_
A v
AT
zp
Ira
Coto
- � Z-�.. ,. n �. ��•.(__._ � � 4 i � . �NY
Q
Ro q , ��
YU RQ NERIThGE Pk
V o� u 115
f � N
WHITE OAKS RU
Prepared By: Prepared For: N
44I Fig. 1 - USGS Topographic Quad
W. Wilson Ave. Improvements w
ECCL{]GL Mooresville, Iredell County, NC S
ENGI1 ERING T � � T 2013 Mooresville USGS Quadrangle
Co 2,000
,,�I Sf �a.-r psraonr,. 3uNe,111 i VLrSIA
1" = 2,000'

C�r�2
Legend
h.4ap1 'Jf
Q Study Area
hrla E4 r�:• ;
Pf"D I
L'gC
0
A 1p
Pa CPC2 Rif
PrE,
� --� Pe..J2 iftl C t � I:li,�
NU Pia"', PrC2
NC 2
VaH
NO!
I'cE2
%?1C CK2
PrD2
HilD =.
C,1E
Reeds Creek
Stream A '
AF CeC^
Md6
Of
Pond 1 rcL2
,? rF) Pr,C�2 Pa PLFi1
CyrPPc09 Ge
a�,,•, i
1,B1'2
PCE2,;'.
Pr.C` MaE4 �.
Fµ«
b-1118 f"T
- CnC2
rgE CgE
flaG1 LfrEl
Pr,E CeK
PeF
,lp
MaU PcC2 r,PB
Paf ia1al]1 "EZ
2 re G"
CyE
COC2 CO2 P;,F CgE
'dt1C PHI
„_�iaaE9 PCF� CeR liaF4 PCCf2 Paf
Prepared By: Prepared For: N
Fig. 2 - Soil Survey
W. Wilson Ave. Improvements WL
Mooresville, Iredell County, NC S
ECOLOGINGiNEERRING T E'er',, f T 2011 IredMap She t 46l County 1 Survey, o soo 1,000
l lil Sf �ary ArL...Y iWe lill IsiY 1c i "C!.i
1" = 1,000'

Legend,�,��r
Study Area
Major Contour (20-foot Interval)
Minor Contour (2-foot Interval)
-VT 150ai f s
"Q„Fq`3h '.�/'" � "+•} f• �` 1., ; , ... J � * ,.+r c- � t �'� a.Rt 5 .��17,(1�
'�y •! �-€� ��� •�i, 1 1 _?Y �� �i ^l , 4. `mil. � �,� 1� q,��e- .
�hp�� yY•" FI :
,r-
j.- � r,. P if /,t lit.. �,, 1 ♦! .
I
1 _ � No- ' � , t k• it r�xliY l��^ �•_ ♦ °�
SR i10
����.. r - ° r}�i y�,r...;r ;,SFr, �t s ,fe } 2�' M1 •+ ibf.r r-•' � - '�
ae7 �i dam` :a ti x :-
/
£�:' P Yr� � ' • - .)iw^i i� `G �,.`'�„�,�ft, ia�s. � � ' �1�� ,ram yr- � �,.,_•
YNiyf 4iK���Y ',Y rvN� ,{k•yK,s�`'v S ��'1,,�.>••4'
v t r
rA A.e� �„s.. riT •r.>
4
,
gip•
h
J )itc r
11
i
F
.Y
Prepared By: Prepared For: N,
Fig. 3 - Aerial & Topography
W. Wilson Ave. Improvements w+
CENGINEERING
+a�ci Mooresville, Iredell County, NC s
TE'�'1f T 20'4 Aerial C ntoursrfrom NCom ODOT GISom o 500 1,000
1" = 1,000'

'- - Legend
Streets
_ Study Area
Other Project Parcels
RADER ELIZABETH B
Project Parcels with
Jurisdictional Resources
DRAKE LARRY CRAIG
JR+PHILOMENAA,
4657419220.000
GANGI
MICHAEL+SHANE,
z - 4657512260.000
�«
�, I, - -• HAY SAMUEL
it ,L ° + H+MARYSE C,
4657418112.000
BRADp_ ` o rr - (z HORN CLAUDE R JR
oRo_ r ETAL, 4657512072.000
N GIY
A. )TOWN OF MOORESVILLE RADER ELIZABETH B,
'- 4657601812.000
tJL. '
-- TOWN OF
MOORESVILLE,
f �N 4656490902.000
` TOWN OF
` GANGI MICHAEL+SHANE MOORESVILLE,
4657500988.000
-
' I ., TOWN OF
_ i .• $TOWN OF MOORESVILLE MOORESVILLE,
,- - :�,. ti 1 4657514098.000
Y { _
FColj
O RSF,
DRAKE LARRY CRAIG JR+PHILOMENAA \
ffi_
Ilk
' a TOWN OF MOORESVILLE
HAY SAMUEL H+MARYSE C''
o� -49
NOTE: All work to be performed
within Town right-of-way. _-
Prepared By: Prepared For: Project Parcels with
Jurisdictional Resources
W. Wilson Ave. Improvements z ��
CENGINEER
ECOLOGIC L Mooresville, Iredell County, NC
ING T E'er'► f T 2014 Aerial from NCOneMap.com o ioo zoo
l lil Sf ry1'+rl..n, iWe lill 11..}Ci-,!-
Map Date: May 27, 2016 i" = 200'

Legend
QQ
Streets r
Study Area vG
Major Contour (20-foot Interval)^
XN
Minor Contour 2-foot Interval
Ephemeral Feature
Jurisdictional, Perennial Stream , , ' «;�" +►_ ,Ir.90. ��„ P w?
.'� fit. f ��„L-AY �` a%CZ` �`•r-* Q'4t\..
Jurisdictional, Intermittent Stream
it c i 6` vv i� �._ .r fit,, • � 2i '!`
Wetland �' .' :. F .���
126ANDER n 1 4 v0\ , f�•j
SEE NOTES ON DETAIL SHEET
x%V12r�5ar r O
C !�. -
elk(iflRilDi Irk"% �j! ` i OGBURN t+ 4l y sCTS 7'%.! �Q'Q ;•rQ-1 s_ . !p
9 GE=BLUFF
,. �� r I r,'i 4-6 - r 'l "i+� i �fiy/b•� -,I�t� '� V r+rs}��,, Q�_ �i' 1
�, �t'y �� � '�l ` `•i _• � �ri *f.w� �,. f `+!F'`� ,< 4 f� �' _,1r � _ }ice'
+" , u _ .,1 + fj'� Y 4 �,Eb 5.,.'/ f�y ( L ♦ '1 t
:.`y Ste. ^u-'+.rc ,.... ��� 1 Tr'. x 4'� . •a '� :�� X* � sy ,,,,?�({�.. 4 ��G �y i�
�` I 'W •Y�, ,�y, 'r\` �p�•.• I 7i �js -. .. f ^ f+ f S,�'. °F' � �
r'` ti� t n�f,''+� t r i c• '� Q� / �WpOD� �NORMAN03
�j,
ZIP
� 51
D 1 f41iNl.�IYL � ++`i, tP•� � 1'' t"': +(r ..� �''< b� 'h ,f�`� � 1� �fri.�
C'
fis
Streams and Wetlands Exist in
s ti
I z- this Area -See Detail Sheet
I '
,0&,
- � I ' GO � T1 • }fie !
'Q
K STONE`RIDGE a �-
�Q •O� 7 ��i r f��f. � s �.. .r Zd`.r '4 •iiln-;!! •; , � \ _
0
ICI
<�
CHARLOTTE'.
•�� t f y0 •%vf • U�sp�► ,� kl l � ►a �'. �, �'� ,�`�� � W/RFC,{.
Prepared By: Prepared For: Jurisdictional Resources
m
�!A Sketch, Overview
W. Wilson Ave. Improvements z ti
Mooresville, Iredell County, NCECOLOGICAL 3
ENGINEERING T E'er' ► f T 201C ntoursrfrom NCDOTGlgom o aoo eoo
Map Date: May 5, 2016 V = aoo'

Legend
Streets
Study Area
Major Contour (20-foot Interval)
Minor Contour (2-foot Interval)
Ephemeral Feature
Jurisdictional, Perennial Stream
Jurisdictional, Intermittent Stream
Wetland
NOTES:
1. Delineation performed by Ecological
Engineering on 2 May, 2016. Jurisdictional
status of streams and wetlands has not
been verified by the USACE.
2. Features are sketched approximately
based on observed conditions at the time
y
of delineation. This is not a survey.
3. Streams A, B, and D were flagged on a
single bank to denote reaches in need of
survey. Reeds Creek was not flagged.
t'
Please survey both edges of Streams A,
B, D, and Reeds Creek (as well as
_
wetland flags).
INSET 1, 1" = 30'
SA-U1 tee to
study Area
WA-06 tie
to Stream A
Stream A
SB-0.'i tie 't6
Strearn A Channel — Wetland A
:Stream
B_ i
SB-01 Star
d
r
Stream A q
Wetland A,
See Inset 1
Ephemeral Features (Not Flagged)
INSET 2, 1" = 30'
" I " r--� Wetland B
_
5
/r
Wetland B, � �C
See Inset 2
2
- -
i #x' Stream D
1 ` Reeds Creek,
Not Flagged
Reeds Creek + '
Stream D —#
5-
_ 01
Prepared By: Prepared For: Jurisdictional Resources
Sketch, Detail
W. Wilson Ave. ImprovementsECO
z ��
LOGICAL Mooresville, Iredell County, NC
7�� T� r T E'er', , f T 2014 Aerial from NCDO ap.com o 50 ioo
ENGINEERING Contours from NCDOT GIS
1lil Sf �ary psr4o.ny, 3uNe 1f11 Ci VLrSl9
Map Date: May 5, 2016 i" = ioo'

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: W. Wilson Ave. Improvements City/County: Iredell County Sampling Date: 2016-05-02
Applicant/Owner: Town of Mooresville, NC State: NC Sampling Point: WA -wet
Investigator(s): D. Cooper Section, Township, Range: Roseland
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): <1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P, 137 Lat: 35.580085 Long:-80.831859 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: CgC - Cecil -Urban land complex, 2-10% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes J v l No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes F No ❑
Are Vegetation 0, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes �F No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Iy l No= within a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes J V L No =
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aooly)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
✓❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
✓❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑✓ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
ID Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes 0
Saturation Present? Yes Q
No ❑ Depth (inches): -7"
No ❑ Depth (inches): 0"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes II No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. W. Wilson Ave. Sampling Point: WA -wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Acer rubrum 20 Y FAC
2.
3.
6.
20
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10
20% of total cover: 4
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Y FAC
2. Alnus serrulata
20
Y FACW
3. Ligustrum sinense
10
Y FACU
4. Acer negundo
5
FAC
5. Quercus phellos
5
FAC
6.
50
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25
20% of total cover: 10
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 9.1 m )
1 No shrubs rooted in wetland.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
0
x 1 =
0
FACW species
40
x 2 =
80
FAC species
50
x 3 =150
FACU species
70
x 4 =
280
UPL species
0
x 5 =
0
Column Totals:
160
(A)
510 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.19
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Impatiens capensis 20 Y FACW (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2• Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
6.
7.
10.
11.
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Toxicodendron radicans 10 FAC
,? Hedera helix 60 Y FACU
4.
5.
70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35 20% of total cover: 14
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes n No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
W. Wilson Ave. Sampling Point: WA -wet
Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-3" 7.5YR 4/3 80% 10YR 5/2 20% C M Silt
3-12" 10YR 5/2 95% 7.5YR 4/6 5% C M Silt
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced
MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑✓ No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: W. Wilson Ave. Improvements City/County: Iredell County Sampling Date: 2016-05-02
Applicant/Owner: Town of Mooresville, NC State: NC Sampling Point: WB-wet
Investigator(s): D. Cooper Section, Township, Range: Roseland
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P, 137 Lat: 35.580148 Long:-80.832827
- Slope (%): 8%
Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA - Chewacla loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes I ✓ I No" (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes F-171 No ❑
Are Vegetation 0, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes �F No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Iy l No= within a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes J V L No =
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aooly)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
✓❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
✓❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
ID Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes 0
Saturation Present? Yes Q
No ❑ Depth (inches): -2"
No ❑ Depth (inches): 0"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes II No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. W. Wilson Ave. Sampling Point: WB-wet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Salix nigra
2.
3.
6.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
1 -9; Y FA(,
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover: 3
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Acer negundo 15 Y FAC
2. Alnus serrulata 20 Y FACW
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 17.5
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 9.1 m )
1 Sambucus canadensis (nigra)
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 1
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Impatiens capensis
2.
3.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 45
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. No vines rooted in wetland.
4.
5.
35 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 7
`a
FAC
= Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0.4
— Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
90 Y FACW (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
0
x 1 =
0
FACW species
110
x 2 =
220
FAC species
32
x 3 =
96
FACU species
0
x 4 =
0
UPL species
0
x 5 =
0
Column Totals:
142
(A)
316 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.23
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑✓ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
90 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 18
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes n No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
W. Wilson Ave. Sampling Point: WB-Wet
Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-3" 7.5YR 4/3 80% 10YR 5/2 20% C M Silt
3-12" 10YR 5/2 95% 7.5YR 4/6 5% C M Silt
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced
MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑✓ No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: W. Wilson Ave. Improvements City/County: Iredell County Sampling Date: 2016-05-02
Applicant/Owner: Town of Mooresville, NC State: NC Sampling Point: WAB-Up
Investigator(s): D. Cooper Section, Township, Range: Roseland
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): <1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P, 137 Lat: 35.580103 Long:-80.831843 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: CgC - Cecil -Urban land complex, 2-10% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes J v l No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes F No ❑
Are Vegetation 0, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No 0✓ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No= within a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No =
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aooly)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No Q Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No Q Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No = Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. W. Wilson Ave. Sampling Point: WAB-Up
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Acer rubrum
15
Y
FAC
2. Fagus grandifolia
10
Y
FACU
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Y
FAC
6.
50% of total cover: 22.5
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:_
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Viburnum prunifolium
3. Ligustrum sinense
A Acerneaundo
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 22.5
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 9.1 m )
1 No shrubs rooted in evaluated area.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Polystichum acrostichoides
2.
3.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Toxicodendron radicans
2. Hedera helix
:; Wisteria sinensis
4.
5.
45 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 9
10 Y
FAC
10 Y
FACU
20 Y
FACU
r,
FAC:
45 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 9
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 37.5% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
0
x 1 =
0
FACW species
0
x 2 =
0
FAC species
60
x 3 =
180
FACU species
120
x 4 =
480
UPL species
0
x 5 =
0
Column Totals:
180
(A)
660 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.67
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
20% of total cover:
- Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
10 Y FACU (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
10 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 2
10 FAC
7n Y FOrl1
90 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ❑ No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
W. Wilson Ave. Sampling Point: WAB-Up
Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-8" 10YR 4/4 100% SL
8-12+" 10YR 4/8 100%
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced
Clay
MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑✓
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

USACE AID#
DWQ9
Site # (indicate on attached map)
M
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: l�,1 d1(141aaj-e3w11fe 2. Evaluator's name:_ �• t c,�2r✓
3. Date of evaluation: 9o/&- OY-02.
5. Name of stream: 1 lr1 /�- llr ' 0 Cr k
t
7. Approximate drainage area: - 0.2 4.
4. Time of evaluation: //.0/ cant.
6. River basin:
8. Stream order: / °
9. Length of reach evaluated: ,ZOt?1-f 10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.. 12. Subdivision name (if any
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.5-s oOS Longitude (ex.-77.55661 1): - 9013149
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS they G Other A-cAe
13. Location of reacts under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying streann(s) location).-
/V. r'w, eg ie-ed3 Creef'.
14. Proposed channel work (if any):. _78Z)-L0,2d,hMp9,vwBILE eG
15. Recent weather conditions: Ad 1?1/ lw"11
16. Site conditions at time of visi
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ,Section 10 Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
C"�hs -h
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed -y (I-iV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NQ If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential S %Commercial _% Industrial ,% Agricultural
�Q %a Forested %n Cleared / Logged % Other
22. Bankfull width: S 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): -
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends M-Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest duality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments: c Aht"s,
ak,,45, &"S, eZc... I5, ;+� e%,r sFrP'add- :�, (.lam. diel, JPn 69n8.& pw_X`r .
Evaluator's Signature Date 2016 - ©.i-D2-
This channel evaluation
orm is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USAGE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change- version 06/03. To Comment, please call 9I9-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
/ f W
j
NS
{� fv
rY // 1 %•/+ " %�� ffi .. ,.
lu
Z-
"
,g;r/ i�,'J,�'�„f/'"• %r r ,,fir,/%r� J ar' ,l,r,%' .r./ r,'' y
' a�'
y[� rp ,• /t' f. rtr .b ` x / ! r
Z
,. ,,...; ...±6. rr;..,...�,..�`I�.,��.(n�.n}{.s
u
'
Awl, r ,"' r,.' ? ,,:, f/-"r r/ rb JY .y All
� ellce ofnEr�euC6'r ehen[�
(� eke d,�has 0 no, drsczres,
r
`
�% rr• �. M, r � f� �! dl�cha eJr %'���'. ��� `r/�' „,r�s5f�'/�/,: r„'r '�rr�r %� ';/r����r ,'/,//p� �'Fi- ,� F/r,� �,�
a
+,ar fr�ty%'
Wwyvirlp-a/
`,9
.i ... ..._ .. r MINIM,
/mew .0 Ll
MESSY
�
0101,10,81.,
yyr„ .. r/ / .fl 3
4Jj OWN
r,:.J.. .. vk%.,,. L,j`rrr'�,�;
f Lr• / , .%rrr/4`x.` :/` i`.
�f/.y"l „q,', rr�lX� �An'vJ�„•-,�
t .�t . J
�,.y/
z
f/�.svr.
%'Kp
�IMN,
s.'r,' f ' /
r Yff
'�+L'1
//y' ,/7 " /,i'. /, f sF . :�S.r✓." Urffi" hP' s':e"�"l Y'`
rl o , e " {�
� � /r% /�K��Tr � .. J nl ���1'�i3'?".�
f l' l ', `
err,,' �" ri<,
i� � �1�����
i C 3 ,, t
i'J'. ���
6,i;.f r�7� r
�'. N +� y,fr�{ fi: , ..a F' �% ��� / '�� f ''�F,�'
f f'''�i / � ,'S'-"1���J'
�/}rF y. �` •"i
Ovvf;l�,,
.
ON,.
. /i �t�
.�'r�. �' ••/i�� v�,�.r?i
�f`��V � %f `'
�
��, //��,""````/(ry/,'`�"r/f� /,�"
ai",��d ,r//„/„J'...
'.,r' yr,�Y �f �.,Yr �/ / ,�.r%if✓"a�F`"{rY' /' � .�r� '�/ 'f���`J
rYd'Fr J 'S` ,,, r' ''h ''�f
/ /'"`� '''F'!/��;;,�'•r''f
ry.
/
N _ FJ f,Et { F
�e r_
7a.s. �.. �'' '�''s �.. � ��Y7 ��, /�/N
' .,f,
:%r"/ d 'r.S''rr ,. /f..o-%'r /
�w',rf'1�r�,y'�,r�/f'f,%;r`; r/�',.rrfY,'F'-J,i„�.r
,f ?'rr !Nr1
���� ^r,.�:�%.
y / Jry/` •"�7"v'J y •.:vgiif//' .r
,
�:`'` �"�`,rf lxF%rr r� •!',` / 1"�i 'r
. :Y Frlf/'{F� f l{ .{fsf i/
///-'dj.ffi/ ,✓/. -.
,k
;,.„„ -.. /y;.. � r�".`r f/"`'. /! ,<.�yrr �,�/! ,, �1 :�f`
ril 9�'f rrJ r�i :.% "r�'irj/�'✓' f
r'.%'r r' .' '?Yi
Y�.Yf�...., �i?��/.�>i"�..
�,�
�f, ✓�,'+,, r�. �r/, ,.�?t�..: .�..,-,,:?,,.....r+,.:�.:. �f lf,.'... �h�i�s„
�N.f F .,««,frf` r�'f
/'�. ,'��
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
"A)�S,,nPw ,.F ..
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: 0h 0- Uure,syl 2. Evaluator's name: 4
3. Date of evaluation: 5 _C� — 4. Time of evaluation: WLO A-111
] 7�
5. Name of stream: t lt.i�� "" UT I e.A C ". 6. River basin: C �C..i c1_
7. Approximate drainage area: W- M . 8. Stream order: J
C'
9. Length of reach evaluated: 10. County: T ► e
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any)
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): J 4 � L�L) Longitude (ex.—77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): QgPV Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
u,op � �5 \A �e_ on 3, e
14. Proposed channel work (if any): — <. (h . v Yv.,4
15. Recent weather conditions:_ _ r) Q rn.i' In i�� I � � (� c �" f�.�
16. Site conditions at time of visi
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters ✓"Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES VjQ If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES CI
21. Estimated watershed land use: �% Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
10 % Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):_
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) L_�entle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: 111teStraight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score ,(from reverse):+ «� Comments: r 1t12c - aow
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
iiiwv viiaiavwiiatlw aiu, 11M a,)�oUbbV l Hl WUNLUI JM-CUII15.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET _
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: ' l /
1. Applicant's name: T Y� D � 'He W . 0 , (9�-'e 2. Evaluator's name: �1- og-h.1`"1"►�l".
3. Date of evaluation: 5 -- 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream:S�reao .L? LEER ,e <; ( ""P js 6. River basin: —Co 1,w 12m
7. Approximate drainage area: 4 0 < < ftx� 8. Stream order:
5. f
9. Length of reach evaluated: 63 ' C) ' 10. County-�T(P C` (.
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): 90s 9 3S S-�
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35 , SS Q 1Jy� Longitude (ex.—77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): GP Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (n__ttote nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
c,-- cv-21/- Li's nwpt-,
14. Proposed channel work (if any): r( ec;;
15. Recent weather conditions: n o ra� y, w i `l",�:, o c�
16. Site conditions at time of visit: SunnW
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters V-Vater Supply Watershed Ia: (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 0 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES (9
21. Estimated watershed land use: -% Residential
% Forested
22. Bankfull width:
24. Channel slope down center of stream: %Flat (0 to 2%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight 'Occasional bends
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES elfo
Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
% Cleared / Logged % Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (> 10%)
Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments: i o n.S
ep �s Gin 4?��a r 4L,�e bLr_ w Gh IA2 ► Ls At e
C"°
Evaluator's Signature Date J "—
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
iiiwv viiaiavwi13tlw al 11UL a66Q6bUU Hl UUQSLUI SLI-CAIIIS.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: - - -t
Project/Site: lq/ �z1',' jJD�� P
Latitude: 35• ti80/`%S_
Evaluator: D,
County-Trehd
Longitude:-13013/W
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (c'
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennia
Other .er,,`rn
e.g. Quad Name:
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"3`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
C7)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
CD
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
n
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
CD
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
)
2
3
9. Grade control
0
CD
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1 0.5
1
1
11. Second or greater order channel
o'= b�
Yes = 3
`artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal = 61 . )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
(M)
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
CD
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biologv (Subtotal = /:)+.% )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
CID
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
®
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
©
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0'5
1
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 fher =
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: C7
Project/Site: W � 1�
Latitude: 3Jr'. 5g
Evaluator: -
County. (�
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determin 'on (circle one)
Other
if 2:9 9 or erennial if a 30'
Ephemeral I ermi nt Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1"' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
C)
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
X
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
(_0_J9
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
anniciai aitcnes are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav [Subtotal = 7 . s- ]
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
0
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes AW
L. 1:3i010UV [Subtotal = t7. F1 ]
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
®
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
(0)
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other.D
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.1
Date:
f
ProjectlSite: W
Latitude: Jr.
Evaluator:4,
County: li(a de)
Longitude: - O
Total Points:
Stream is at least Intermittent �`�
� �
Stream Determination (circle one)
e eDll Intermittent Perennial
Other c
V c
e.g. Quad Name:
If z 19 or perennial if a 30* - ,?
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1", Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
-ripple-pool sequence
0
�
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
(3)
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
QD)
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
COP
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
aruticiai ditdnes are not rated; see discussions In manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ) • S }
12. Presence of Baseflow
(D
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
cy
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
UP
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = , 0 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
OD
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
QD
0
20. Macrobenthos {note diversity and abundance}
(Q7
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
(J
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other Zro
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: �^ '} ,
Project/Site: �s -�-
Latitude:
Evaluator:
,
County: T
Longitude: - I
Other D - 2
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent j�
Stream Determination (circle one)
z 19 or perennial if z 30' 7 .
Ephemeral Intermittent r n I
e.g. Quad Name:if
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
12, Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strung
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
0
1
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1C2>
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
0)
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
®
2
3
8. Neadcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
arunCiai aiwnes are not raiea; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = / 0 , 0
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
Q
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
Q1V1
0.5
D
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
0
0.5
CD
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
C. Biology [Subtotal = , IN
18. Fibrous roots in streambed,
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
C41
2
3
22. Fish
CT0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
cy0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: nD�s
G��

W. Wilson Ave. Improvements - Iredell County, NC
Site Photographs -Taken May 2, 2015
Photo 1— Reeds Creek, looking Upstream toward W. Wilson Ave. Photo 2 — Reeds Creek, looking Downstream toward W. Wilson
Ave.
Photo 3 — Stream A, looking Downstream near Flag SA-1
Photo 5 - Stream A at Flag SA-39, tie to Reeds Creek
W. Wilson Ave. Improvements
Site Photographs
Photo 4 — Stream A, looking Downstream from Flag SA-35
Photo 6 — Stream B, looking Downstream from Flag SB-02
Ecological Engineering Project No. 10502-150
Page 1 of 2

Photo 7 — Ephemeral Feature C, looking Downstream
A+ y
Photo 8 — Stream D, looking Downstream from Flag SD-0
Photo 9 — Wetland B (no photo taken of Wetland A)
W. Wilson Ave. Improvements Ecological Engineering Project No. 10502-150
Site Photographs Page 2 of 2

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
TOWN OF MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Project Name:
Project Location:
Date:
TOWN OF
MOORESV1 LLE NORTH CAROLINA
W. Wilson Ave. Improvements
W. Wilson Ave. from U5 Hwy 21 to NC Hwy 115
June 2015
The undersigned does hereby authorize:
The Professional Engineers and Scientists Ecological Engineering, LLP
of
(Contractor / Agent)
(Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this
permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Mailing Address:
Town of Mooresville
413 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
I hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of
my knowledge.
Ryan Rase Date
Deputy Town Manager, Town of Mooresville