Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19970455 Ver 1_Complete File_19970523State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources • Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary ID E H N F1 A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director August 19, 1997 Guilford County DWQ Project # 970455 APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS Mr. Michael Habig Morningstar Group Inc. 10833 Monroe Road Matthews, NC 28105 Dear Mr. Habig: You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to fill in 0.19 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose of commercial fill at Greensboro, NC, as you described in your application dated 20 May 1997. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3108. This certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 26 when it is issued by the Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification. This certification replaces one issued on 17 July 1997 by removing the requirement for a wet detention pond. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below. Deed restrictions, conservation easements or similar mechanisms shall be placed in all lots with remaining jurisdictional wetlands and waters to prevent future fill. These mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of this letter. Wetland mitigation shall be conducted as described in your application. If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing. This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786. Attachment cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers Raleigh Feld Office Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office Mr. John Dorsey Central Files Bradley Bennett r stop oward, Jr. P 970455.1tr Division of Water (duality - Environmental Sciences Branch Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone 919-733-1786 FAX # 733-9959 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recyded/10% post consumer paper State of North Carolina Department of Environment, LT.IAA IT Health and Natural Resources 4 • Division of Water Quality James Hunt, Governor p E H N FI Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director July 17, 1997 Guilford County DWQ Project # 970455 APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDPITONS Mr. Michael Habig Morningstar Group Inc. 10833 Monroe Road Matthews, NC 28105 Dear Mr. Habig: You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to fill in 0.19 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose of commercial fill at Greensboro, NC, as you described in your application dated 20 May 1997. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3108. This certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 26 when it is issued by the Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below. Deed restrictions, conservation easements or similar mechanisms shall be placed in all lots with remaining jurisdictional wetlands and waters to prevent future fill. 'Iliese mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of this letter. Wetland mitigation shall be conducted as described in your application. An additional condition is that a final. written stormwater plan including wet detention basins must be approved by DWQ before wetland (or stream) impacts occur. If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing. This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Domey at 919-733-1786. Attachment Sin rel , ton How , Jr. P.E. cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office Mr. John Domey Central Files Bradley Bennett 970455.1tr Division of Water Quality • Environmental Sciences Branch Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NO 27607 Telephone 919-733-1786 FAX # 733-9959 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycledtl0% post consumer paper .' , LEONARD S. M"NER - -- - Environmental Planning Consultant 7113 Hickory Not Drive Latedscape Ambitecture Raleigh, NC 27613 Land planning (919) 370.919.1 Date: August 10, 1997 To, John Dorsey Prom: Len Rindner John: Thank yQu for your approval of the permit application. Please And attached excepts from our permit application report describing mitigation and starmwater quality treatmem. We workzd closely with Ron Linville and he was very suppord" of our approach to the stormwater treatmmi. Jobn 'T'homas of the USACE also conditioned the NWP #26 to include the proposed fninhization, mitigation measures indicated in the application. ralk "..... No impacts are proposed to the 6' to 8' wide creek along the rear property litre. This creek will be protcctcd by a winimurn 100' npa-OgyploRmeul buffer. Jurisdictional Waters which will not be disturbed will be protccted during cormtrwtion from damage due to construction traffic, drainage and other forms of disturbance". "... The following stormwater management facilities and initig"oo measures are facilities are proposed. These r . ect g minim on the site m j% John '1'LuarY,,,m_ tha l• ISACE and Ron Linville of the N('DM These mit gWon facilities ark igioded to ac= within a.75 acre to .80 acre zone of talc site and take admt= of exi.rtina nAt' ml systems. ".» It is also important to note that the paved areas on this site are used much more sporadically with this type of commercial use in contrast to a retail establishment thereby reducing the potential pollatiou in first Mush runoff. l) Minimization of impervious area on-site to the extent feasible. " T, al W= Of im -rvio rc t1it e this SAC is 45% Mott of the rea iin ng 55% o_f t _ area will Lmadn >?n?rgl?tIId not land r&M thereby reducing the in TnduWoa of lawn ohemiesls,.MattQidw„ hcrbici C3. and feat mm U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT Action ID. 192700947 County Guilford GENERAL, PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICA'T'ION Property Owner/Agent Morningstar -Group, Ine c/o Mr. M'ke Habig Address Monroe 10833 Road, w Carolina 28105 Telephone No. '704 847-0445 Size and Location of project (waterway, road name/number, town, etc.) Morningstar ro up's propgrty located off of Randleman Road adinvenl to an unnamed rib uta of Ryan Creek- near dr?e,nshoro. in Guilford, County, North Carolina. Description of Activity Proposed development of a storage facility operation that willrr,5ujt ju impapta W approximately 0.20 M=s of the-Jurisdictional water5 an above beadwate s trit= Byan Creek. This permit is condition d to ittclt?d mi i do eggures of a vegetated &i er for stormwater utilizes lu a pools. le el s discharge velocity and eftbaztia hftio R to h.3* ?zh 'trti 'c vegetation in the buffer. _ -Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only. Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) only. Section 404 and Section 10. _-. NWP 26 Nationwide Permit Number. Any violation of the conditions of the Regional 0oneral or Nationwide Permit referenced above may subject the permittcc to a stop work order, a restoration order, and/or appropriate legal action. This Department of the Army Regional General/Nationwide Permit verifioation does not relieve the undersigned perruittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State, or local approvals/permits. The permittee may need tp contact appropriate State arid local agencies before beginning work. , Regulatory Project Manager Signature Date-July 1997 Expiration to July 8, 1999 M i_._._ SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEAI MI ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF RE( r 4;,, tj CA445 MEMORANDUM PRINT Re? T0: JOHN DORNEY WQ ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES BRANCH SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS -EACH ITEM MUST BE ANSWERED (USE N/A FOR PERMIT YR: 97 PERMIT NO: 0000455 APPLICANT NAME: MORNINGSTAR MINI STORAGE PROJECT-TYPE: COMMERCIAL FILL COE #: RCD_FROM_CDA: APP REG_OFFICE: WSRO NAMES: viewer: 3"/2 L SUPV.: DATE: 120 b NOT APPLICABLE) COUNTY: GUILFORD f?Ecoj?-!, PERMIT TYPE : IND. 1 jR 1991 O DATE _FRMCDA : 05/23/97 RIVER AND SUB BASIN J: 030602 STR INDEX N0: 16-11-14-2-3 STREAM CLASS: C WL_IMPACT?:(VN WL_TYPE: 13 t+v WL_REQUESTED: 0,15 WL_ACR_EST?: Ykg:l WL_SCORE M: N A WATER IMPACTED BY FILL?: ON MITIGATION?: Y/N S•as? C,Q?,? ,,? a MITIGATION-TYPE: (9, 1 S^ MITIGATION_SIZE: ,3 , S'-0euV-.DID YOU REQUEST MORE INFO?: ? IS WETLAND RATING SHEET ATTACHED?: Y/ HAVE PROJECT CHANGES/CONDITIONS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH APPLICANT?: Y/N RECOMMENDATION (Circle One): ISSUE SUE/CO?TD DENY COMMENTS : ?S`?? (?-cL m, f L) ?a c G a ` <?- -? Q-- C- AJ %C? F ?S CC?T/ ?J- , U' l Y F L-r ?- <Z i o- J cG- cc: Regional Office Central Files LEONARD S. RINDNER Environmental Planning Consultant 7113 Hickory Nut Drive Landscape Architecture Raleigh, NC 27613 Land Planning (919) 870-9191 May 20, 1997 Mr. John Thomas US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 6508 Falls of Neuse, Suite 120 Raleigh, NC 27615 910455 Mr. John R. Dorney - Water Quality Planning Division of Environmental Management - NCDEHNR Environmental Science Laboratories 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607 Re: Individual Permit Submittal - Morningstar Mini-Storage. Greensboro, Guilford County, NC Dear John: Please find enclosed the Individual Permit Application and supportive documentation for the Morningstar Mini-Storage Project in Greensboro for your review. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional explanation. Thanks. - / e - e o V6naa ard IS. XRR i finer, P W S Environmental Planning Consultant NC Landscape Architect #578 cc: Mr. Kevin Vogel d Y 0 45? MorningStar Mini-Storage Randleman Road Greensboro, North Carolina Guilford County Individual Permit Report and Supporting Documenta f? Prepared For: MorningStar Mini-Storage MorningStar Group 10833 Monroe Road Matthews, NC 28105 Prepared By: Leonard S. Rindner, PWS Environmental Planning Consultant 7113 Hickory Nut Drive Raleigh, NC 27613 (919) 870-9191 LandDesign Engineering Services. Inc. Oak Branch Drive, Suite 14-C Greensboro, NC 27407 (910) 855-5785 *Subject to verification by the USACE Date :5197 1 1 1 ? 1. PERMIT APPLICATION H. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION III. THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES IV. CULTURAL RESOURCES V. AQUATIC HABITAT VI. JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES VII. WETLANDS PERMITTING AND MITIGATION VIII. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IX. PLANS AND MONITORING X PROTECTION FROM FUTURE DEVELOPMENT XI. CONCLUSION APPENDICES 2 , APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT I OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-003 (33 CFR 3251 Expires October 1996 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send .mments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information0perations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arington, VA 22202.4302: and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NO RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10; 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require permits authorizing activities in, or affecting, navigable waters of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Disclosure: Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be processed nor can a permit be issued. One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned. (ITEMS 1 THRU a TO BE FILLED 'SY THE CORPS 1. APPLICATION NO, 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 13. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED (ITFMS RFI nW Tn 79 Fn ( cn RV APW II`d Nn 5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE ton agent is not re%wral Morningstar Group, Inc. Mike Habig, Project Engineer 6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS 10833 Monroe Road Morningstar Group, Inc. Matthews, NC 28105 4222 Atlantic Avenue RaIP;gn NC 77F,n4 7. APoi_ICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE , 10 AGENT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE a. Residence a. Residence b. Business (704) 847-0445 b. Business (919)875-1178 1 1 . STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION I hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DA NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY 12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE isee uutrucrons) Morningstar mini-storage Randleman Rd., Greensboro, NC 13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (Ifappacswei 114. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (Ireppncabw Unnamed tributary of Ryan Creek 15. LOCATION OF PROJECT 2711 Randleman Road At Intersection of Corliss Rd. and Idolbrook Rd. Guilford NC COUNTY STATE 16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, (see instructional 17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE Access to the site is by exit 124 from Interstate I-85 / I-40 ENG FORM 4345. Feb 94 EDITION OF SEP 91 IS OBSOLETE. roponent: 18. Nature of Activity (Dewipaonorpmiec%, kwud..rneturesl Development of storage facilities, office, parking, access corridors, general grading and storm drainage facilities - see attached report and plans. 19. Project Purpose Mosedbe tbe rwwn of purpose of the project, see lnstroerionsl Development of self-storage facilities for rent. S BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED 20. Reason(s) for Discharge General development requirements - see attached report and proposed minimization and mitigation measures. 21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards _._Eill_:-will. -include :earth. for general development - see attached plans.- 22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled rseelnstrvctto,,sr f .20 ?Scr4S 23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes No Y_ IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK 24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (If more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list). Refer to attached list and survey. 25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application. AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL- IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED City of Greensboro Planning Department - Technical Review Committee City of Greensboro Inspections - Grading Permits City of Greensboro DOT/NCDOT - Driveway Permits City of Greensboro Engineering Department - Water, Sanitary sewer, Storm drainage approval 'Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits 26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized a pent of the applic nt. s^y2 7 SIGNATURE OF APPLICAN DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed. 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both. ' U.S.GP0:1994-520478/82018 MomingStar Group of Matthews, N.C. is planning to develop a storage facility for rent in Greensboro. The 13.40 acre site is in southwest Greensboro. It is proposed to be built on the corner of Randleman Road, a major thoroughfare, between Corliss Road and Idolbrook Drive. Access to the site is by Exit 124 from Interstate 1-85/1-40. Surrounding landuse includes single family developments, small commercial/strip shopping centers, and offices. This site is ideally situated to take advantage of and enhance the rapid economic growth related to expected growth in population and employment opportunities. The project is consistent with City of Greensboro zoning and engineering requirements. The project includes 143,460 square feet of building coverage including storage space. The site is heavily wooded with a mature forest along steeper slopes and floodplain area in the rear of the property. In the process of site plan approval the owner- developers of this project have worked hard to design a first-class development which will meet the growing retail and residential demands of the area while being sensitive to the concerns of their neighbors. Due to the site planning constraints (earthwork) of a development of this type, large contiguous areas must be graded as building pads and parking. In order to develop the_,__ property 0.20 acres of wetlands and surface waters will be impacted. This includes 1,154 If of intermittent tributary. The average width of these small streams is 2 to 2 1/2 feet. About 500' of the streams have been channelized. The wetlands will rate as moderate to high value relative to pollution removal, bank stabilization, aquatic life resources utilizing Guidance for Rating the Values of Wetlands in North Carolina - Fourth Version. To balance the environmental consequences of these unavoidable impacts to surface waters and wetlands the developer has proposed minimization and mitigation measures in coordination with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality. As shown on the plan developer seeks approval to impact approximately 0.20 acres of jurisdictional waters in headwaters. All fill material will be unpolluted and appropriate measures to control sedimentation and erosion will be employed. No impacts are proposed to the 6' to 8' wide creek along the rear property line. This creek will be protected by a minimum 100' non-development buffer. Jurisdictional Waters which will not be disturbed will be protected during construction from damage due to construction traffic, drainage and other forms of disturbance. The developer is proposing storm water management and potential wetland restoration and creation to balance the environmental consequences. These include re-creating a naturalized tributary and utilizing the 100' buffer to treat storm drainage. The following sections describe the important economic and planning criteria, the description of the alternative analysis and finding of no practicable alternative, minimization measures, mitigation and proposed monitoring, and other permitting and environmental considerations. H. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The proposed MorningStar Mini-Storage Project is located on approximately 13.40 acres in the south section of Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina. It is proposed to be built on the corner of Randleman Road, a major thoroughfare, between Corliss Road and Idolbrook Drive. Access to the site is by Exit 124 from Interstate I-85/1-40. Surrounding landuse includes single family developments, small commercial/strip shopping centers, and offices. This site is ideally situated to take advantage of and enhance the rapid economic growth related to expected growth in population and employment opportunities. The project is consistent with City of Greensboro zoning and engineering requirements. The project includes 143,460 square feet of building coverage including storage space. The site is heavily wooded with a mature forest along steeper slopes and floodplain area in the rear of the property. In the process of site plan approval the owner- developers of this project have worked hard to design a first-class development which will meet the growing retail and residential demands of the area while being sensitive to the concerns of their neighbors. Due to the site planning constraints (earthwork) of a development of this type, large contiguous areas must be graded as building pads and parking. In order to develop the property 0.20 acres of wetlands and surface waters will be impacted. This includes 1,154 If of intermittent tributary. The average width of these small streams is 2 to 2 1/2 feet. About 500' of the streams have been channelized. The wetlands will rate as moderate to high value relative to pollution removal, bank stabilization, aquatic life resources utilizing Guidance for Rating the Values of Wetlands in North Carolina - Fourth Version. To balance the environmental consequences of these unavoidable impacts to surface waters and wetlands the developer has proposed minimization and mitigation measures in coordination with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality. As shown on the plan developer seeks approval to impact approximately 0.20 acres of jurisdictional waters in headwaters. All fill material will be unpolluted and appropriate measures to control sedimentation and erosion will be employed. No impacts are proposed to the 6' to 8' wide creek along the rear property line. This creek will be protected by a minimum 100' non-development buffer. Jurisdictional Waters which will not be disturbed will be protected during construction from damage due to construction traffic, drainage and other forms of disturbance. The following sections present the results of the environmental planning and regulatory reviews of the project site and a description of the impacts and proposed minimization and mitigation measures. The undisturbed wetland areas and the mitigation sites will be preserved by the applicant or by a group designated by the owner for this purpose. 4 III. THREATENED AN ENDANGERED SPECIES Federally listed plant and animal species with endangered or threatened status are protected under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. Records maintained by the USFWS indicate no known endangered or threatened species with ranges that extend through Guilford County. IV. CULTURAL RESOURCES The Office of State Archaeology (OSA) and the Survey and Restoration Planning Branch (SPB) of the NC Department of Cultural Resources - State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was visited on April 18, 1997 to review existing mapping on the USGS Quad maps. The purpose of this review was to determine if there was previously identified sites in the project area. Based on the review of the maps at the OSA and at the SPB, no previously identified or surveyed sites are currently indicated on the maps within the project area. V. AQUATIC HABITAT The aquatic systems in the project area consist of headwater wetlands and intermittent tributaries of Ryan Creek. Ryan Creek is a tributary of South Buffalo Creek. A variety of wildlife is supported by these systems including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish, insects, mollusks, and crustaceans. Therefore strict adherence to an approved erosion and sedimentation control plan will be maintained during the construction period in order to control degradation of water quality downstream and protect the areas to be preserved. Impacts from hazardous materials and other toxins to fish and aquatic life such as fuels will be avoided by not permitting staging areas to be located near surface waters. Also, as required by the 401 Water Quality Certification conditions, measures will be taken to prevent "live" or fresh concrete from coming into contact with waters until the concrete has hardened. VI. JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES Preliminary identification and delineation of the Jurisdictional Waters on the site were determined according to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1, 1987, with Appendices. Preliminary data gathering included review and interpretation of topographic maps; USDA Soil Conservation Survey; aerial photographs, and preliminary site visits to selected areas. Then the Routine On-Site Determination Method was utilized to determine the upper boundary of the wetlands. In order to make a positive wetland determination indicators of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soil, and wetland hydrology must be identified as described in the manual. 5 Typical observation plots were located along transects perpendicular to the drainage way direction to observe and record potential indicators. This information was then recorded on Data Form - 1 which indicates specific information about the typical plot. The upper boundary was assumed to occur between the non-wetland and wetland plots. Due to the complexity of this site, numerous additional test plots and borings were conducted when necessary to increase the accuracy of the delineation. Once the wetland / non-wetland determination was made, the characteristics at that point were utilized to determine the wetland boundary between transects and additional test plots through visual observation. The approximate wetland boundary was determined in the field by Leonard S. Rindner, Environmental Planning Consultant, and was reviewed and verified by the USACE (John Thomas) in January, 1997. This delineation between upland and wetland was then surveyed. The actual wetland extents for submittal to the USACE for confirmation, planning, and potential permitting purposes. The site is within a drainage area of a headwater tributary of Ryan Creek to South Buffalo Creek (Water Classification : C NSW) in the Cape Fear River Basin. The majority of the site is a gently sloped ridge in various stages of secondary succession from agricultural uses. A mature oak, hickory, beech dominated forest occurs along the steeper slopes near the floodplain. Bottomland hardwoods including tulip poplar, red maple, hackberry, sycamore, willow oak, and river birch occurs in the floodplain. Portions of the floodplain include dense understory of ligustrum. Most of this area now seems well drained. The primary soils according to SCS Soil Survey on site primarily include Enon fine sandy, Enon-Urban land complex. These are typically well drained upland soils. The steeply sloped areas could be subject to severe erosion. The floodplain soils include Chewacla sandy loam. According to the SCS, there may be a hydric inclusions in poorly drained locations. The vegetation in the forested wetland areas are dominated by Facultative, Facultative Wet, and Obligate plants and includes red maple, green ash, alder, silky dogwood, and other typical tree and shrub species. The herbaceous layer consisted of sedges, soft rush, and others. JURISDICTIONAL. WATERS AND WETLAND DESCRIPTION 1) "A" - Wetland Area and intermittent tributary (PSSIA) = ± 0.19 acre 2) "B" - Bed and Bank Tributaries (PFOIA) = + 0.04 acre 3) "C" - Bed and Bank Tributaries (PFOIA) = + 0 11 acre Total Jurisdictional Waters = + 0.34 acres Intermittent Tributary - 1,354 LF Perennial Tributary - 715 LF 6 Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters on this site have been avoided and/or minimized to the extent feasible. Impacts to wetlands are limited to the following: 1) "A" - Wetland Area along tributaries (PSS IA) = + 0.16 acre 2) "B" - Bed and Bank Tributaries (PFOIA) = + 0.04 acre 3) "C" - Bed and Bank Tributaries (PFOIA) = + 0.00 acre Total Jurisdictional Waters Impacted = ± 0.20 acres Existing Length of Stream Average Stream Width Stream Remaining Impacts to intermittent tributaries ± 2, 069 LF + 6' to 8' Wide Perennial + 2' to 2 1/2' Wide Intermittent + 715' LF -Perennial - + 200' LF - Intermittent + 1,154' - Intermittent tributary VII. WETLANDS PERMITTING AND MITIGATION The area was identified by the developer as an appropriate location to develop this project based on an extensive economic, marketing and demographic analysis. During earlier planning stages other sites as depicted on the attached exhibit were investigated but lacked the appropriate dimensions, and zoning to accommodate the development. The owner reduced the overall project size to allow for the 100' Buffer Area adjacent to the creek. In order for the retail development to be successful and recover the initial multi-million dollar investment certain spatial criteria must be met. These parameters include: a) Visibility from major roadways. b) Corners and/or intersections which historically is the location of the market place. c) Sites are generally rectangular having a lot depth not to exceed 800 - 1000 feet in order to provide visibility for anchor tenants from adjacent roadways. d) Site requirements must also meet local setback, buffer, detention, fire, and landscape development requirements. 7 Improperly designed retail centers often fail and leave vacant buildings as eyesores in the community. Further reduction of the size of the building does not meet current market design standards and severely jeopardize the success of the project in this highly competitive industry. For these reasons, it is apparent that with the proposed mitigation and minimization measures to reduce the environmental consequences of this intense development that the wetland area and small stream areas be filled for this retail development. While most of the impacts to jurisdictional waters and wetlands are apparently unavoidable due to the engineering, and spatial requirements, stormwater treatment facilities will be incorporated into the design of the project. No impacts are proposed to the 6' to 8' wide creek along the rear property line. This creek will be protected by a minimum 100' non-development buffer. Jurisdictional Waters which will not be disturbed will be protected during construction from damage due to construction traffic, drainage and other forms of disturbance. The following avoidance and minimization efforts and measures have been taken: 1) Reduction of project scope of the project to allow for the development of stormwater management facilities and wetland creation mitigation if applicable. 2) Modification of typical and standard treatment of storm drainage design. 3) Best Management Practices will also be employed to minimize impacts to Jurisdictional Waters. This will include: a) Siltation Barriers; Sediment Traps and Diversion Ditches b) Barricades to define construction limits c) Preconstruction meetings d) Vehicular access will be restricted to specific areas to avoid disturbance to adjacent wetlands and natural areas to be preserved. e) Methods to prevent short term impacts will be inspected regularly and maintained during construction of the project. f) Wetlands to be preserved will be clearly marked prior to construction to prevent accidental damage to wetlands. The contractors will be held responsible for unauthorized wetland damage not permitted according to plans and specifications. Preconstruction meetings shall be held if necessary with representatives of the USACE and the NCDWQ. 8 g) Short term construction impacts, primarily stream sedimentation will affect aquatic habitat, however this will be minimized to the extent practicable to promote rapid recovery. h) Project construction will strictly adhere to an approved Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan. Best Management Practices will include utilizing siltation trapping ponds and other erosion control structures where appropriate. Impacts from hazardous materials and other toxins to fish and aquatic life such as fuels will be avoided by not permitting staging areas to be located near surface waters. i) As required by the 401 Water Quality Certification conditions, measures will be taken to prevent "live" or fresh concrete from coming into contact with waters until the concrete has hardened. A final stormwater management and mitigation plan has been developed to provide for a "no net loss" of wetland habitat, value, and function to the extent feasible on this site. The wetlands on this site based on an evaluation by the NCDWQ were of high quality and value according to the Fourth Version - Guidance for Rating Values of Wetlands in North Carolina. Most of the values are attributed to: Bank Stabilization Pollutant Removal Aquatic life habitat The following stormwater management facilities and mitigation measures are facilities are proposed. These reflect a review on the site with John Thomas of the USACE and Ron Linville of the NCDWQ. These mitigation facilities are intended t occur within a .75 acre to .80 acre zone of the site and take advantage of existing natural systems It is also important to note that the paved areas on this site are used much more sporadically with this We of commercial use in contrast to a retail establishment thereby reducing the potential pollution in first flush runoff, 1) Minimization of impervious area on-site to the extent feasible. Existing forested areas to remain to the extent feasible. The total area of impervious surface on this site is 45%. Most of the remaining 55% of the area will remain natural and not landscaped thereby reducing the introduction of lawn chemicals, pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers. 9 2) Stream Relocation and Creation Re-establishing a natural vegetated channel with rip rap jointing, natural planting and other methods to dissipate velocity and create pools and riffles. The revegetated channel as well as other on-site storm drainage will flow to a plunge pool and then to a stone level spreader. These will spread storm drainage evenly over the approximate 100' wide forested area for treatment. It is expected that substantial portions of the floodplain area will be restored to wetlands. Storm drainage from the existing and mostly stable residential area to the south of the site will bypass the storm drainage system on this site. 3) On-Site Wetland Creation The creek apparently has been substantially eroded due to the increasing amounts of stormwater from the surrounding urban areas. This has hydrologically isolated portions of the adjacent floodplain by reducing the frequency and duration of water inundation and saturation within the proposed mitigation area. The loss of the wetland hydrology has also been enhanced by deposition of sediments from disturbed areas upstream. The USACE confirmed that these areas are not considered jurisdictional wetlands. It is expected that with increased frequency and duration of saturation from stormwater runoff that several pockets within the floodplain will be restored or enhanced adequately to become jurisdictional wetlands. This observation was made with the assistance of Ron Linville of the NCDWQ. This will be accomplished by directing stormwater to these areas to these areas as well as for stormwater treatment. The water will be diffused utilizing plunge pools, level spreading devices, and/or other methods to reduce discharge velocity. The floodplain area has a diverse population of hydrophytic vegetation that will likely withstand the increased duration of saturation and ponding in the winter and early spring. Dominant species include sycamore, red maple, silky dogwood, privet, tulippoplar and sweet gum. Herbaceous species currently include honeysuckle, poison ivy, microstegium, and others. It is expected that with increased saturation some vegetation may suffer, such as eleagnus, privet, honeysuckle, as well as other upland species. However it is expected that willow, green ash, alder, and other herbaceous species would succeed naturally. Additional vegetation monitoring will be conducted following issuance of the permit to determine the need for additional planting in the future to enhance the habitat values. The use of BMP's will be used as appropriate to minimize unavoidable impacts. Impacts from hazardous materials and other toxins to fish, such as fuels, will be avoided by not permitting staging areas to be located near tributaries or wetlands. Also, measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact with waters until the concrete has hardened. Employment of strict erosion and sediment control procedures will be specified to avoid impacts to water quality. 10 Existing wetlands and surface waters and buffer areas will be protected from erosion and sedimentation during construction and installation of the mitigation sites. Control structures such as sedimentation traps, siltation barriers, and/or at a minimum silt fence will be utilized as necessary. The Stormwater Management Plan has been designed and implemented for the project to meet the 401 Water Quality Certification requirements. The stormwater management facilities will be designed the Stormwater Best Management Practices NCDEHNR' November 1995. To help offset the loss of the wetlands value and reduce the potential nutrient impacts downstream the developer proposes utilizing the non-wetland floodplain and a 100' buffer and filter strips to treat runoff while preserving the mature forest habitat to the extent feasible and to potentially create/restore storm drainage wetlands as the primary treatment system. Properly designed filtration areas and buffers have been proven to be a viable solution to reduce pollution and have been utilized to protect reservoirs and streams in protected watersheds. Establishing and maintaining a natural, forested, low maintenance ecosystem will reduce the volume of runoff, and thereby reduce erosion and pollutants coming from an area of more intensive land use to a water body. The reduction of erosion and pollutants occurs through natural mechanisms such as deposition, infiltration, adsorption, absorption, filtration, and decomposition. Natural forested areas have the capacity for collecting and storing nutrients and the canopy protects the soil from erosion. If additional area is necessary for treatment based on calculations during the design process, stormwater wet detention ponds or other methods will be utilized to supplement the proposed treatment plan. The specific plans will include: 1. Detailed Description of Proposed Treatment Facilities 2. Methods of Construction 3. Grading Plan & Storm Drainage Plan 4. Planting Plan for relocated channel 5. Monitoring Methodology 6. Schedule 7. Additional Information as required-'USACE & NCDWQ conditions All new plantings will consist FACW and OBL species. Planting will be conducted in the spring and the fall. Annual ryegrass or other annual vegetation will be utilized in order to provide temporary stabilization during the summer and winter months or until planting times become available. 11 During planting wetlands and surface waters will be protected from erosion and sedimentation. Control structures such as sedimentation traps, siltation barriers, and/or at a minimum silt fence will be utilized as necessary. Scrub/Shrub Alnus serrulata. Betula nigra Cephalanthus occidentalis Cornus amomum Ilex decidua Lindera benzoin Sambucus canadensis Viburnum species Others as approved Bmomland Hardwood Diospyros virginiana Frax. pennsylvanica Nyssa sylvatica Quercus species Taxodium distichum Others Herbaceous Zone 1 - Wetland areas in temporarily saturated soils or subject to occasional and brief inundation Agrostis alba (Red Top) Polygonum spp.(Smartweed) Carex species (Sedge) Juncus effusus (Soft Rush) Eleocharis spp.(Spikerush) Leersia sp. (rice cutgrass) Zone 2 - Wetland areas prone to persistent flooding or nonding Moist to 1 Foot of Water Three Square Bulrush Creeping Spike Rush Soft Rush Sedge species Lizard Tail Shallow Water Plants Sweet Flag Arrow-Arum Duck Potato Pickerel Weed others Planting shall be in naturalistic / random clumps to encourage diversity. Specific plant species, quantities, and size which will be utilized for the mitigation sites will be dependent on availability, cost, time of year in which planting occurs. Existing wetlands and surface waters will be protected from erosion and sedimentation during construction and installation of the mitigation sites. Control structures such as sedimentation traps, siltation barriers, and/or at a minimum silt fence will be utilized as necessary. Future impacts to wetlands that are created and preserved will be protected by the applicant or by a group designated by the applicant for this purpose. Deed restrictions and protective covenants will be developed to protect these areas from future development. These deed restrictions will be submitted to the USACE and the NCDWQ for approval. 12 It is expected that willow, green ash, alder, and other herbaceous species would succeed naturally in these created wetlands. Additional vegetation monitoring will be conducted to determine the need for additional planting in the future to enhance the habitat values. Detailed plans for the mitigation areas will be further articulated from the plans included in this document. These plans will be submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality for approval. Plans will include : Site Preparation Requirements Vegetation Requirements Tracking and Monitoring Requirements A monitoring program will be developed to monitor the mitigation areas to include: Vegetation Parameters Species Composition and Abundance Survival Growth Monitoring of vegetation will be conducted on a semi-annual basis for five years according to the following general procedures. A. Measure growth, species diversity, advise on removal of invasive species. B. Establishment of a representative sample observation plots C. Periodic site visits will be conducted for maintenance, aesthetic purposes, and possible modifications to increase survival rates. D. Field data will be recorded on a monitoring data form and submitted along with representative photographs in a annual monitoring report. This will be submitted to the Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Water Quality. At the end of the fifth year a report will be prepared for review and to determine the need for future monitoring or modifications. Reporting Annual Progress Reports will be prepared which summarizes the data collected in the field and notes trends. Photographs at fixed stations will be taken to document the trends and changes occurring at the sites. These reports will be furnished to the USACE and the NCDWQ. After the fifth year of monitoring, a summary report and as-builts will be furnished to the USACE and the NCDWQ for review and discussion regarding compliance of the project with conditions of the permit. Success Criteria The data collected during the monitoring period will be utilized to evaluate the success of the mitigation areas. The success criteria will be as follows: 13 Soil saturation within 12 inches of the surface for a minimum of approximately 12 consecutive days during the early part of the growing season. Establish at least one hydrology indicator per the 1987 USACE Wetland Delineation Manual in the sample plot. Establishment at least one hydric soil characteristic or match adjacent riparian habitat surroundings. Not less than 60% survival rate for planted saplings or other planted vegetation. These vegetative, soil, and hydrological characteristics must be met to determine success of the wetland mitigation. If the mitigation is determined to be unsuccessful the following one or more of the following contingency plans will be implemented. 1) Selected re-installation of vegetation, thinning, and/or acceptance 2) Hydrological modifications or manipulation 3) Alternative sites 4) "In Lieu Fees" Schedule Grading and installation of water control structures where applicable will be conducted concurrently with project construction and is expected to begin in the spring/summer of 1997. Vegetation planting and installation is expected to be conducted in the dormant season of November, 1997-March, 1998. Temporary crops in areas to be seeded may be required until final planting is conducted. X. PROTECTION FROM FUTURE DEVELOPMENT Upon completion of construction of the mitigation sites as - built drawings will be prepared. The survey will include: boundary of each area finish grades drainage control features The preserved and created wetlands and buffers will be protected from future impacts by the applicant or by a group designated by the applicant for this purpose. Development of these areas will be deed restricted in accordance with restrictive covenants which will be developed for approval by the USACE and/or NCDWQ. Restrictive Covenants will include the following information: The area shall remain in its natural condition in perpetuity Acreage of wetland preservation area, wet detention ponds, and created wetlands Prohibition of the placement of utilities, filling, dredging, construction, or other activities. 14 A permanent easement for the purpose of constructing, monitoring, and maintaining the mitigation area and preserved wetlands. Obligations if monitoring indicates that the area has not met the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual criteria. XI. CONCLUSION The 13.40 acre development will have useful benefits to this rapidly growing region. The development will be an asset to this area of Greensboro by needed services. The goal of the site plan with minimization and mitigation measures is to help balance the environmental consequences of this development by creating and/or protecting beneficial wetlands and surface waters and protecting water quality downstream. Due to the economic, engineering, and spatial requirements of a commercial development of this magnitude and after a thorough alternative analysis, filling of the wetlands areas on this tract has been proven to be unavoidable. We have reacted positively to recommendations and concerns of the USACE and NCDWQ. The developer has made a sincere commitment to provide the minimization measures and compensatory mitigation for impacts to streams and wetlands in order to develop this commercial facility as provided in the application. We are requesting your assistance and approval of our application with the conceptual mitigation plan as expeditiously as possible to help meet many contractual commitments. Since the engineering, architectural, sedimentation and erosion control, stormwater treatment and wetland mitigation on this complex project need to be designed together, the plans will be developed concurrently with the Construction Documents to make sure they are effectively coordinated. As stated in our application final mitigation plans will be submitted for approval to the USACE and the NCDWQ for approval. Construction of the mitigation site if on-site will occur concurrently with other aspects of the project. 15 SEEGER MAP COMPANY HUNTER B V ,kE11MWL i"S NeFen TA . / d? .r A. Si ? ?. A6 d ¦ J UlHM? • 'r' ?...Y..,I ^ S FR T 3 LEN 00 REC a ECK P r O G DPECK RCALOGEWNA ¢ J ' A' Y`. N I 'nom _. A ,, MIODLEN SCHOOI? . CENT R r ¦ FIRE ELEM. SCHOOL t REC.LENTE P RK F ?? J FLORlQA 4T. ¦ r GIL[?¦qHP RK H WII TER. ¦ ? ..t p STA71 3 S BNX E f ; E' BPEG S ? ( ELEM pSCHOOL 1 ; C n CENTER k' T a N.C. ERI.oYOYME rrpp 2s` ' IL Sp1E ,. O NOSPI- o y ?Z?a OFFI 3 1A11 S L ELEM. SC OL A j r??, FHOME4 PARK I ? ' I 27 03 ° ? $ • i -. r ~' 0 t SI Ippy E I FlRE ST 1 11 f ?? ? I ? ? P . J . .- - NM - q SIw -FOUR"SEASONS TOWN CENTRE --? d nm K 51 SOUTH ELM STp Aro r ¦ WO SOUTH a ' Po M M E n IC n I • NaPPF „? CI ? qq O SPRI VALIEGY d W. LN PlA2A P P9OA NO 'j CENTER y?j f pp A Xraa e tt O a R V 4 4 G .? - 4PAING LLEY CHr LEMSEC I? L^ SHOPPING Hi 1 E_ m '. j PO l11Nd - ¦ CENTER uuuu1111 4t I N 9TONE47NROW CROSSING SHOPPING HEN L SMITH: G e'^ R q CI r W t = SPRINO VALLEY t ; CENTER HIGH HOOL S ?' C ,FyMt PARK ®¢ W 8 1 : F 1 '? 421 ¢ n 5 4 I p ? A CHER .' ETEM. SCFIOOL K?B°'nne G W M Po D Ctu:mee 1 E r 't M -; HAMPTON PARK ? yy 0r YI ` vme Kn 1 Q, ?' ° r N FIRE STATION 13 ? ,., Q 1 9 a V c a • L Ct yF M b O roPL b j d Cr H A TF G Pi d ? a c . d d - ?I 90 '9l1AI ?? WE TB RY_ FRAZIER ,. 0 F P RN ELEW ? r FQF ALLEN ! M.DOLE } * _ ¦ SCHOOL EPOINTE 27406 I ?p/ EM. SCHOOL R0. ? I ' ?v VICINITY MAP / I Nwwen o I AXF ru. `4net+R jr- . 1tlH111` `\L\1m _`M. I i ~ GeeY _ Aro Rd S -- -220 SITE d - - --- -- 70 e 40 ? iI G' D, }eI Ir p / G' GREENH A V E N /S P K d Q f` J g E emml A ry FFF ?n 1] .r*ODLEA ACRES i W00DLEA; G LA,EE PA N A PARK HE BNRANCHSLIBORARY UARE BRANCH Po Knot d VANDAUA ELEM. IN SCHOOL ¦ F _ w y Re - Q 11"IHMA "K } / Ve _ V r ?N G Y fiN.f \. ' I E s 1 -? - RAND EMAN AC 6 MAR 2740 PX. to ''.., (MA m AU. P _ " ? ? flARI. Rd 8 ?8 ? MorningStar Mini-Storage Guilford County, North Carolina Leonard S. Rindner, PWS s Exhibit 1 04" ZD r (J- Date : April 28, 1997 5 ,, _IX M E L EM SCHOOL st MXM^ B '• . _ ; LEN 00 PECK • O O PECK = Y+n r J.C MIDDLE N SCHOOL LENT • a R FIRE STATI 1 B SCHOOL gNYX 5 P RK _ a J 51 S'+ SCHOOL ELEM. MURPHEY S ¦ F / ;oMES I ?? 27 03 PARK 1 6 G I? ? ® ... J ; Srw - - " - - - ??"FOUR SEA40N5 X,n 4 E n n d I p TOWN CENTRE E K. ? y oo+^H Ra - w t cl IVTH F .. •.. j i ?-l2`4W +C 1, 9 Y ? an 1 UST N + ? E SC C M Z ,• L LHa, E , . ROLLDIO ? C W . ?STHROW A 0 C z LI -- SPRING VA X BEN L SMITH; a SING ^?: M ;. A h wX ?+^ l PARK R IGH SCHOOL N + I $ ? p I 0 d , f 1 f ?a ¢ P ? O 5 CL ?b ?> Q b a 7 A r E CHER 5CHODL EM NY . ?t d 8 I _- _?-- - i CBI ^ R R 70 PX OIT ma 1 r J T 0 1. M PA RK ' : abRURa OILL[DP!? RK ? BOUOATION TER.. r SG TI' E,.j+,?:. , a. ;IF?,tLr Ya G' ' N i N C. E?y0YYE1 T • . 1 QK,?Q$PIE ' ... O HOSPI G 9 ofcK. e PARK „„ra M' Hn, }I I 1 I N ? V M . FIRE ST 11 . II G, SOUTH ELM 9Tp 13 X pw 9 PLAZA SHOPPING +p b CENTER ;PO +^ tl w I 421 SELECTED SITE a P iNUmW r X / d w G I I C woos r-? ? aldela I I 1 Or 2 "M ' 1 a 06 BENCMMpRK S °a"a Y -' n .. w d SOURRE RC V __ _-_ .?__ _ 90 __ rp N a A? Mun .. d XM ? I __J VOCK p PARK 'E + 1 G NE TB RYG ELEM ERC i O al....?. _ :.!® P RK `' ?~ • SCHOOL C¢ v.• • ^. a) ly ALLEN MIDDLE 8.* SCHOOL P g - ? --? [ D POINTE POINTS HOLDEN I ?I RAND MAN cROSSI SHOPPING °C,•MARI T \ CFN7ER ALTERNATE SITE 2740 G PX f 1 ? . ?n I ?1 27406 g 220 F p 8 8 ; R+RR I j r I Y $ ??, a I a, ' a SUMNER ¦ l{Z 1 ELEM. SCHOOL I O Pn. ?i I ' I, \ I ? I I ?Q I p 5 NHaa>ow -- d M ?- P,I / 8 __J i +"'a j I pa Rn. B°"°on gip; sl _... { MorningStar Mini-Storage Nwm+nDm, Guilford County, North Carolina - - ---- -- -- - __ -.. -- _- -- P - ___._?__ Leonard S. Rindner, PWS -? i S+wxbr Pn Exhibit 2= OF X20 N? 1 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS SITE LOCATION Date : April 28, 1997 ISEEGER NANY i\o / L ffoicd 40 J T r PiM t1 ZIETIC *soon- I C'S I •. •• Ps le- - f^ - / ter. `.T--- '.T'] •?• - j _ • G -?_ ?J/? . • *. eel`:/_ ` ,II Roe SITE. it >,- _ - ± ' - • ,Poe ?. ` 1 /. s< t PO Mini-Storage ,O0 \ •• • • ; i t . Guilford County, North Carolina • • • • ` ?,?, ?'!. :iC, •,Q f ` ; Leonard S. Rindner, PWS "'_'_ ` ; t ?.: -. F o • +i __ t j,, ?,? Qf. ?''? Exhibit 3 OF LO l NWI MAP Date • April 28, 1997 .* t y J y ? i ? /4 a •dl+ ?, /i "y'.Ym1`, . i'' . '?,??? ?s ; '1R•_ ? rJ? ?, ?v ?Rt ?' ML EuB y k, t '? ???SAS ...?0 ?'lr"" ?,vt "'?'?.1??i A. ?rc? ,??f ?.. ?Blk,v/,.? ? £. ? 1 ? ? ?A?q ?f' ????; '"? fix' >z EuB lift { ? ?? SITE ??. " 71 rR, <i l _ x a uB. nit, s ups? , x r ?, . te'n' r,] i' ?,?.;?? ??? - .: +?• ? ,? . ?T ( a _s„ h? ?O ...? r ??=` ?"'?,;?. ? ,,,, __'"? X yy a "vd ?' r d s C ?S U B . @<_? MorninaStar Milli-Storage Guilford County, North Carolina Leonard S. Rindner, PWS Exhibit '4 Or ZO n [7 NRCS MAP *'a e , !?". 1 3 A> w Date :April 28, 1997 1 3 ;xe ?x tts a k Ipi py¢Qee QRi R81tiy oY is i ? t?r ? ?`_?? 2 aFt y'E8tp?Ye? ig 2? ? P G °c ..ki^' 4 d itits I Y I . Y _ • I .i• r.--.. ;:1-•a..Ifit,,,t il; ?_ ?_„f \`_ ?nf'+,t• 64: ?.. J?° r \\\ I,. I WF litl '"_ °+. a?E ? aY I ?? s'i I s' I c ;it< I ? I vd :9; HA I 'y N `? I I I i1! ° a r I I /- I mot' t, I I " E I I I Wr I I i I •?rt .- _E I I rt FL- ii , r ? ? ?I : ? Ep I %1 e I .ate °i? iia ? ? I -?? } ?:¢t ,.? r. 111°.1:?•`-? i ?' -'-?..? I 1 FY I 10. i a,1v 1 E ° ?a pYpb N4 a Nyb v W ..>d WETLAND DELINEATION A ? s fi+ _ ? is I . ? tt ??, • Is? I?ilil II iJ Y •. V : [ in,.. Ili4liAlf{ttd?li .. _. JURISDICTIONAL WATERS AND WETLAND DESCRIPTION 1) "A" Wetland Armand intermittent tributary (PSSIA) =±0.19 acre Morningstar Mini-Storage 2) "B" Bed and Bank Tributaries (PFOI A) = + 0.04 acre Guilford County, North Carolina 3) I.C. Bed and Bank Tributaries (PFOIA) =+0 11 acre Leonard S. Rindner, PWS Total Jurisdictional Waters = + 0.34 acres Exhibit 5 OF XO Intermittent Tributary - 1,354 LF Perennial Tributary - 715 LF Date : April 28, 1 997 111 =aa zn9 - 3ntao o A1?.4 I .-- -? •8 S .01'Qt.I M.Lr IS .S S _ <G I -?__?-- W PC ' 40 I .S- i8.. 11 9 •. 2 yW a_ C _ I 9 W a° " 9.SL x3183 VD } ?rCl M I v'?oU I Y` ^Y 1 g^Y ?/ C*'?(S ` i ?72d 19 Es 3 <QiSa W 1 ism C ? a o a I =xi5? 'xc =..d w 3 B o Wa A A<" I m.. y. I -11 -4r,. .sb s"W W <° e I s; _ I sc sod: r? rrs< d S.e E' I is: I CJ cJ 71 I - - V W? .? cz, ?? M I I ? •?o I T ?? ?? ?? ?I I W G ? ' i_mmd? ! W I ga. ?4s g I I y s fY f„ N? I _ I ¢ I I Na i u V I O f _R V)R c n I I ?s O i ??^A• IRa ?? I I aoR: tl ?_ . ?p G iC ? I I I ' ^c gam Z .J I + I =-?' ? 3GCC a.?a I w v I .. % s= h I Q Q i I r. a I R`? ? ^E? 1 Fax ? i ? i z I I _Y =s o 3 F 4 I I q;._ s ? ? ?' I I 4.4 I _ I Aa. ?$• i3 =Rb ••E rya L' ?,, I' i .2 H. C-4 Z-d 3: 0. vi M - ?b4l????. ^s ?. I Yya "? I I 1 3.W .01 .Cl N I I I ce en Al MorningStar Mini-Storage - wa •°t •0vv"Guilford County, North Carolina WETLAND DELINEATION Ob?a NbW3jQN1Va Leonard S. Rindner, PWS Exhibit (i OF 20 Date : April 28, 1997 I I i'9( 1 r.(I S. . fl YSy 1 R W 1 LYng? Q I U U W`a ? O ' az « [t h•[IS?-l5 1 tZ 1d •t9 flu 3 a. m ?d xa? Re ? a I °?s sstl ? a ??s ? ? gl .r?•rty .Sa I ..d . R 4 I W W m I i0 I n I I I I I I ? I \ + I W Q < 0 I ? I 1 i ` I I I, W r, I z • N Yv a a°? a Nm?, I I I i I I I i I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I a„ W,1 IY = i°? =Sv ° gn> R°P ue sog e - Qf Q ? 4- o O a ? ?c N S - u ¢ v Q "9 .. Qa zce 0 ?sy 0EL \. • rna •• °[Poti . . 14Nba ---? WETLAND DELINEATION t w ?- :sF_Y M1 S 9 " S y N F i°-• 1 N W 10 0 Y a ? rl ? Y G a 1 v¢.._ I ?4v?9 GAD 1 a O U Y0 I m l? Ov ?a ?35?: _?vn ai d3d'Jhd a5 'N;iv'.) 5? 1 W G 1 a - ;•? e u, r I j ¢ a a rr ? za ? za ?a n F z?r, n G 1 v I .1 ?, ? jn r a 'na 4 °m I vi VN 1 1 T S p n _n a K n a^+? Na 1 ? zo Jar ?', 1 ' ?Wn WO ?•m m' 1 1 a iz G s tj U I 1 N 2 1 1 w 1 _ r a i a` i 1 1 NC Z?_ a z a ?` I i d W.-? -n i 1 J !L ' V I • ? r .00'191 M ,00 ,9Z .. S - g i I1 5bo ??° rn T- I'? - ?z L IVr 2 n r m I I ? I ? I s I ly, O 2 I 0$ m I J O 0 I MorningStar Mini-Storage I Guilford County, North Carolina :I Leonard S. Rindner, PWS Exhibit ? CO' ZD Date : April 28, 1997 ?• i e..0e ° gYS• °• aTh2l el ?•. §?: ? e Rz?i s: YS ? a ??9 lei 2 1 tl9zt ri < ? ? ° 6ypr6 };- a a It'll 1° Tii Z ° - Yv a ??? 9 ! s '?? a YT` , ,1? Y s d pe ? yi' •it's?lT,?al??I t,r?'a 91??; ? $p ?? ?? ? I €? gg I s ? ?? ; ? ? ? ? 4ii? C s ?eelg;?7p?F??js14?? ?gq94'! ? • ? n -- -- ------ --- p - -- - ---------- -- ---L-AH IF a r to }1=r , ?,; ii Y! 9e a'}til! ?. ,< /,= e! \ ` .? i T I • ;? : p at "I a 11 1 • a . r ' 1 (• ?l i #? '???+. •; n.w e,ae., .EE - -, m.., E 1 I I tiE s,<!Y E14 xf? Iwl ?. t ia+..sw a,=.o. • °fm:°° C i? ; ??S' ?Y b` I a I I I I I e,?i? ? ! .e W la_:!_ ? 6 A„?„ ? !I ;- •?:., ? ? -? -'?F??? ; ? _ ?...- Baaas /1pp '.m `al~i•?ti?lfr• ? ?.`_?_? •'??,•?'?.== I:dTT ,"ef: I, ??•Tj,• a .? ?_ ?*`rt=s?4-. ?_?? "Yl E5 x ? ? 9 a a? !r w4 .. a 8? OVERALL SITE PLAN ??? - I. I aEliH v ,? 7 Y fill MorningStar Mini-Storage Guilford County, North Carolina Leonard S. Rindner, PWS Exhibit $ of zo Date : April 28, 1997 J O Y 'r O ^ a ?} k ZZ si 1- W 5-p ?. J "CSC N W ?C 1 N J a R4•. `5 x r.', 6 ; Z e' V -z m ?r7y? h:? T .yB{ ' t ? ? ?I 3 r131 L7 _ , ? S ? C" t l41 . J U ? ? O Y ZO W O y] µ0Z Q s? . N r Z ¢ O j Q w V Z H < 4 F' E WZ N 0. < eeE? E 'o Q f w &g z Rl O a 2 O 1919 ,H ?? 9"a a tl w i' € S z U Z F•... << Q __ ! Z O O 6 LL .... Z W _.,y .. t 33 55 w z < _ o a O ,. e ?c I 9? ' a W ~ f JW a' N ?• J ~ ?i _ ? X e ? a 6 Z a 5 N J ; w LL ?_ J.g 'w ?.1R? 1 I o f O O f 1• O l P f'?- C R tI '1 \ .0 wx ?' / w.y V LL < ~'' < y Z W Nei w "'to.J {{y1I ? ? pC, °u. I - C } I ? "Q' Fa- _A?I?'?'':''Y •.J,I •. J N _ RI 1,9? FO FO O O I 3 e II J ?r ti o ? .s• •I fl .? wi W ` p?•a°y ; LL II z 4 = a Z Z rW- E A C " `I?. W? a r la a ,? %-p N ?I w 8 r 1 '?I I e p - n 1- w N L I. p = QR CL z _ ~ < ,}I m ado Q15I v aZ - w? Q ? ,?'r' I •IaY ?.. j? yn ??ibPr+ O ?II 1 1 1 .. o v, •1 ?L p `r'ai. .1?, pad, p I I < I if , w , r 0 f d,??'A y z cc z iz' t I .,1? ?,+r-•.z- ?? ? ?`? .;!•?. .?../ a v_Ui -?C f ?'°"°"'"'°..I I? ? l,lx N ?l 1 C;7 Q w``?-? p >+,?i Z o? z } ou o ? Y yy 7A7Q I 1 ip ?5 ?. \''f `? ^'f.\ga. yYi=t % W as J `R O o < 7 ,pp?1, yS6 C 9: < ?p ?? IQYi ` _ MorningStar Mini-Storage Guilford County, North Carolina Leonard S. Rindner° PWS OVERALL PERMITTING & STORMWATER TREATMENT/ Exhibit 9 OF 20 MITIGATION PLAN Date :April 28, 1997 76C EXIST. GROUP 750 DATUM ELEV 745.00 N tD PROP. G RAD ID WETLAND LIMITS B ACK OF CURB o° °. 00 o N U 0+00 RLE NO. TYPICAL WETLAND CROSS SECTION DATE: INGSTAR MINI-STORAGE MAY. 1997 MORN -+?•?; SECTION • ,..aDec* NUMBER W _ X CS-1 FI ?- MorningStar Mini-Storage Guilford County, North Carolina Leonard S. Rindner, PWS Exhibit 10 OF 20 1+00 NG PROP. CHANNEL H OR. 1 40' VER. 1" = 4' 380 CYt - WETLAND FILL PROPOSED SECTION Date : April 28, 1997 4.1 lei ?\ ON ne 3pvypn 0, \ ?? ,,\?. l Nbiva W W ?a J R O ? \ ?w l II Q. vwoar wt 4d t > - p as 30X 1,,, ?, . `.; h lj; 1?I 11 J; Z ?Ir? 8 oil, _ R QSO. a , \ \ V V ,; "I y+ti? d au R " Z I: ? ? 1 r -rnarua?lwar w ? ? M I, i i I! I/ oHama'?raois'r 1) I ?• ; 2NIM, ?oruois 435o eae-- ` c c ~ 'r 'i1 \`' Q %; s l u' ANmine r?vaocs O3 Q C J W V= f w. J st,' J = Ceu =rant Q ow", Q 42 oi'azda) W O O - J i O V arc ln?vavaa a W -_? - Q J I ?h*t Li ^ d Z s .1 w w 1 \- / ?- I' fl LU 69r '..1 W , w LL , onminq -ar7ts W ` f dOvd Orr W O Z T?11 Z t \ ' i? ` O uaiv a raoys 1 210. N . J - W ora)Ine 3o+aoirQ>soeoaa `\ -\ a Orr :..t\ A = 0 :111 \ rf y? - - p LL ti atS7Shcs ??- \ o- /' 75 N°a II m •03S Z Z jR ?', Q vt X \\ I l e,,a W Z 3, ` ' -?L/7 `?sQlc <3 Itl$ AV, =?_elK`47i - 6e1 (? x PIS u W LL a l r/. w r Z V ''' r ? I I 1 I (n I 1 I I ? / r ' a 1 I I I •\ t I 1 k'? ?M r ' II t l\ Q \\ 1 g w MorningStar Mini-Storage C7 Guilford County, North Carolina ' r Q Leonard S. Rindner, PWS r F- Exhibit ( OF ZO 1 Date : April 28, 1997 V r+ r ?,: '%40 Tfw? •u raj y + *t 7'sR?.f3 KL ?q{rc a v . -T.. •.nuc+q rwdlw. a +. rr?ia.! '•i.+4 _ -1 ._.? _i ? : .-?SC? '?., 1 ? C w y .rr ? n ! !1' a •^t }+. ,,?.r .. pia -, ?; _ h 4 f • Fucw pwdP yl 4 ct s +ar s6 .f•rqJj? .J,T 31 .14 ?.??v'W..+Tr,?y?'??'4?ylSyrr#?, '?P? .v r?•y?[,?. YiTl"?fG. o'., ?. as a % V ?", x yry r !• r X +• \ J\Y\ x . f ^F.k ^L !x'F A ,{ Q •sy'?Ye b ,r ?': -.;?:?•?; `^ O O ? C ? ? ,s.", ?d ,?, ? Y?.• ,. 3 f, /•. I. ` Y ? f? r `.r ?' !J ?'' t:'t' O O C >r ??? _ r - ° Ca 0 r '' ' .. ; r ><7".t • 2' . T/,TrilMl h• II II II II ? E ? 5 tc-, ?. Y.,. J F wa 1- _?ry Y??7.0 ^J??5 \q,y? Shy .L •: W \ w 7 3 a r`+:: Z to »v.. Q rV, <p?' ?? ! Z «. 0 Q.'Q :.-?•' ? fr ati<p, a,f,?' .a at + jar iA:r raw. r-7 (?, .I ?.r .may. r < • .a{,aa`'4 i-• o o r- p _ _ r +? w/ ?"? µ S a '? 4 t?ru ;? ark n N 0 r- c4 ',t* ?+ +r d s • a +1 +1 +I +I +I +I I , ' V I Q Z f!! a 39 \,• Eo o m O a'p'z j w ro+ C7 W [? Lz. F t q E. .1,'.J .[ ' ?ib._ ? ?.? L .?. Qy ?t. .:- Q :yA.d? '?1e??? ??h ?•',•O ?; .. 0 3. to Z I f " SFr c Y 0 do o o' rf a in A cC 1- tir W O W W pQ $ iy ` ,j? m LIJ + ?' I ?vb v 8 H Q.' U Z LL Z O Q r ., Y; Y: „ 5 H Z Q H f I- 3 $v J a. Uj y a z c > N J W ?N F w¢ vz 3 a ..a ?- Qj z --- <? W \\ LL, ?\ I'll I ` s`$ 2 I- _? -- ---- ---------- --? - __ --- 'ii' A' f I rr ?oY 3 \ a 2 E J -? -- vm, ai3?3nv w 111 I .ir.KAOS> -_ `Mw YR II i Sp ~ 8 _. .y` d I I'rI Ik All ? a`?:?1• a,` t ?lT _wt +t0•` _ ? ? ry. ^{}?uT ?. -'1 I r.Q 3,T11i1h ? :;;_ 1 >! Tr ? r ?? ?'" 3Yt ?'"s•31 i, II ? I x ?? yi a ! I ei . Y •`? ? .?? ? ?J$ ? ? ?• ??.. wi' --tea. .,:??`; ??%: rj,. ?;? , `4R •'i ± ?C R _' : I ? 11 ^.? - , . - .?. , • J•. .mob. ,? Q?, . d d ljit \\ I i -oH W \/. \I,? ('? `'. il' •1?. \ `loan a K -r''? ,?. max, \\ r\. II ?' ?. III I \.•_? I + : p I I J _ IQ 1" ?,- R p NIA vw W - W o ?MorningStar Mini-Storage \s a ? + all ,t > Guilford County, North Carolina ? I? I ; W S J - W _- W Leonard S. Rindner, PWS I o ry y -? oa Exhibit 12 OF 20 w _j s Date : April 28, 1997 r t/ + W ' I to 7. If, 'fir ? / 1 << O ,?' Q "?'-•-' Q = U. A .? > LL /- f r adi" Q Q a Q a' O ?_ W W Z --' :45E I'vig is i W ' f CL 88 -. - i W /n, Q Q Q r 0 let Q oNglrg r R a - Ana 3ovaaFs oaodoae 18' Q Ott Uj R r M ; W na braou oxo',oae' W I J --- Q • W F- R, J = C ?u????oav cu 'aula) W f!) / O ,? V - arr wad , • \ , \ r. \'• - '-' -- Q CL a.+ e 4. U. W? G' -aim 3ovaus aaoeaw .. /W/??{{ Q ?M,?/'? C Qe I r, ', V e? .OLf V T:y \ \i W Sib /u. in ?7i I3 I? 7? •I Zia a /01 ?!'5 Iii t W / 3ovaoi?`Q3soeoaa v ` 1 7 SN 'tot _ oo ac y s I rt n3C .'?, `??F 7 AI ;1 yt ,??? rr` U. y ' W AM W 0 Fn Ott N 71, I. ?: _, ,??, . a•,{r{,,, ,.,? ? `\ \ \ ? ?wois woad - L' -{ I . ,+ \ ?` r. a . X \ \ \'uc :d I n 1 ` W !Qn +an a3soeoae : 1 n , I 11 <3 Ct q_. X`-;? - \ I ':?? III a y • -`+>>r 1 = -€dl ` ` - A`• vyp`i?ryp •,,`_..?`? '.I? iI.A 40 lot ?- .;s r a+?14= ???.? -? ? -{mac -? ?j< " ? • - tl?/3vj ii Q+i Q Y o-I ti? Q? 0 06 i \ ,Iy y, 77 Y!y( / Q??1?.(?r r a LIJ T ?oa. law ozgzt W?? l + 1 W I S?g7i - W,^ \??? mac' =6 "• % w ¢°¢' 4 CL 13 Q? Morningstar Mini-Storagte W \\, ,1 \ 'ly ?`I J Guilford Countv. North Carolina Q ; `t t\a ', Leonard S. Rindner. PWS a oN° . \ °` W 0 O Exhibit 13 OF 20 ? Zo \ y , y\ •\ I Z , Iz us W Date : April 28. 1997 b ,.y ?: `.t•?' _ .; ?f1. ?lt',:,:-?5-?. i:: • :?;?::..,?•y...... r?;t:rs•Ry;,$?1t4"?r¢4w`lea:?:tia?":? ?fi??{S''T.,•?•.iitlY•????.wv?.?.r?.+y??,...? _ ?' ? :.N.. ... ,. _ .•. ?1 .1,) •sf aT L 1' y?y?r ?+f tr??",? \ f'f? ?".. "d f ', •(_ f: •r?r/ N,.?y•1'?1•"\7..Z•'+r?'' .. ?•??.'rq• ?i,.aY E) y" Na 'a h?1 1'1 ` tiN"\°' lit ,t., ?''. to y `L ?t'y'f+. ,ti ?. r ?'\Y ?/I !'? "4}, , 'f` t' r'Y rw F 'M Sri r yc?• 4•" k t t .;, tt L y,?, Zt . t'' ?c9 v.y ?''?• tf.rXs? r ^ t tr ??-. y 'v :t ? r ?" 'i i• ? •r '? ? . ?fS \?" Ss:? ? ''4. c')lF./ 1 F o r' i . \. € a M t ? \ ¦ ?St a?ti: sd 1? X a3x , Y _ ?? ""C ay ?• r 1 , y ?? v ; ?`!,•}.t„i j•? ? ? ? t\ c rr??'?.Y??r ,2 r z .v \ G A a, ? r / , .-_,t c?o+. + 1 , ?i" 1 y\1•_ \.?.; I?!'?aoypS:f . t i"c%. '?i \I ti v ..1 M'?,j \ ,•1?} ..al- ''?; e: •t- . r T / ?7iy. ra ,,,'"t'•• 7 .I,r: V?• v ,??+ly t. '-? •/ 1rbc.s y .r i 1 , r:Z ).,r\=:' PM Z ,. ?• L• •r ? ? w r.: ? r? ? 'R ? ? a y x p 3,2 1 Q ; t r k r w Q-.? kr j y cf .4 K_ l \t 2 -^ ? K '+ t t 1 L ?? ? - y 4 Z t -v:7i+:' 1 e: W-!,y?/.?. ¢ p\^S?e!y? 4'{,'? i J! x a y a t F tau r a ,, s 4 W k. rL .Q •_+f<ly ,+<?,;F Vii.; ty., r: ". \a?y? \ t?,ir,? y 1 r et• ?? 'M r IT!jr .4 , or 51 1?. 1?1 b }?' d A !1. wYp4 I.. i \I/ S Y S 1 1.? ?T• '• .' 1Li'?1,,`h,'C ?' MS ??•It w k 'I +? .•,,,Q y?, / j /f?.v ^? ?• 3c O rX9 t3i~ O i 'ys trr+:.sJY ..? r n e.? tsKSt?^ Z y cyy? rfrtr ?I? a Z I^ t f '?` E+ S, A ,?? Q /? V 1?e7" '??p •.1 im dpi .5?. W ,.on +1 ZZ a ? o i Z "c) c e c o x p? o o `Z a 4 e y v *: 'i ) . y? yy/7• yy?77 5? p' "?Q?S yW? yW1 M - O •`$•VI "' ?v yy1 '\,R'r a"• • 4] Jp ?1l W +c ?i j r X t :? O J . Q U. • ? li O '• pP y. 7rr • 3 F Z Z, I.i. J W O r f, ''i?byr? \ g Q W 1 8 "? : Q Z LLI - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .zr 3Aupmw3 -- ?`- - - a-- _ E J ^ 8 ?- - ?, W t Q•V t ? v? - ??_. Qi? r 1 1 L" \ t t /r W Jl Z ??,'nJ^} Sri its (? 'j ,\\',• N y \\?- S 1 / //' .1.?`? 4' \ Y ?' d t 4 ?. ,4' i `O •#(L. W,p?t rW? (b 7 4 L.U s?rT ^fL JI •. 11 fsl ?l , O t /y/ f?` W O U. d I? i va, f.^ ..? -•Jr '. .4 y d?Yf Q ` Q r'? a ? O ?_?I .ti W a Z - y r' c ? .. I 1: ?? J J J ? iv: M. .9 MorningStar Mini-Storage !t - ?` ?' ~ ~ ~ Guilford County? North Carolina \ ?•; \`?? \`?. '" ?` `: h ' -'? e Leonard S. Rindner, PWS+ , \ \? `? •?, `; T\ •\ . :' e LL y ;p Exhibit 14M 20 _ t Date : April 28 1997 Q s 7 t A ?: 1 ? - aatiy bwws A? TOP OF BANK d d d d d d d d d d d d d d - UvE STAKES d d d d d d d c."I d d d d d 0 oo°o°no 0° °o° °° 00%0 00 JTE ° °o 0o o° ° ,.. °_?? \---- TOE OF BANK FLOW ,_ A PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE LIVE STAKING BURY A MINIMUM Fn? GRADE ? of e' (TYP.) EROSION CONTROL MATERIAL - EXISTNG CHANNEL BOTTOM NORMAL WATER LEVEL PLANT SPACING BASED ON TYPE OF VEGETATION AND SITE CONDITIONS. SECTION A-A MECKLENBURG STORM WATER SERVICES CHANNEL RESTORATION TECHNIQUES MorningStar Mini-Storage Guilford County, North Carolina Leonard S. Rindner, PWS Exhibit 15 OF 20 > Date : April 28, 1997 Procedure: 1. Material: A. Live staking plant materials must be from dormant shrubs or trees that will root well from cuttings and are appropriate for the hydrologic zone in which they are planted. For example, black willow, silky dogwood and elderberry all generally root well and may be planted in either zone. Cuttings should not be smaller than 1/Z inch in diameter and not greater than 2 inches in diameter. Recommended staking materials for the two planting zones may include: Frequently Flooded: 1. black willow (Salix nigra), tree, 80-100 ft. 2. silky dogwood (Cornus amomum), shrub, to 10 ft. 3. elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), shrub, to 12 ft. 4. cottonwood (Populus deltoides), tree, to 100 ft. 5. tag alder (Alnus serrulata), shrub, to 15 ft. 6. spicebush (Lindera benzoin), shrub, to 10 ft. 6. arrowwood viburnum (Viburnum dentarum), shrub, to 10 ft. 7. yellow-root (Xanthorhiza simplicissima), spreading shrub, 2-3 ft. Infrequently Flooded: 1. black willow (Salix nigra), tree, 80-100 ft. 2. silky dogwood (Cornus amomum), shrub, to 10 ft. 3. elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), shrub, to 12 ft. 4. coral berry (Symphoricarpos orbiculatus), shrub, to 3 ft. 5. groundselbush (Baccharis halimifolia), shrub, to 12 ft. 6. arrowwood viburnum (Viburnum dentatum), shrub, to 10 ft. 7. shadbush (Amelanchier arborea), tree, to 40 ft. 8. redbud (Cercis canadensis), tree, to 40 ft. 2. Equipment: A. A saw, loppers, and pruning shears to collect and prepare stakes; B. A steel rod or rebar of slightly smaller diameter than the cuttings to be planted (multiple rods may be required). A small sledge hammer(s) may be required to pound the rod(s) for the pilot holes; C. A dead blow hammer to drive the live stakes. MorningStar Mini-Storage Guilford County, North Carolina Leonard S. Rindner, PWS Exhibit Ito CV 20 Date : April 28, 1997 REOIRNTLY FLOODED MATCH EXISTING GROUND CUT EXISTING BANK To F?W. CREEK BANK SLOPE EROSION CONTROL MATERIAL RECONTOLMING OF BANK -? MATCH CHAW4EL BOTTOM EX1SnNC EXISTNG CRUNEL BOTTOM 2 CONSTRUMN NEW BANK (F REGUR DOF ) T r SEE NOTE 2 I NOTEI CEOTEXTI E FAEMC ?- FILL TO FNSN BANK SLOPE W"H COMPACTED ORCAMC NCDOT RIPRAP FREE FXL MATERw_ FILL To BE PLACED N 1 • MAX. USS AND COMPACTED BEr*M LIFTS. RIPRAP TOE PROTECTION WITH BANK CONTOURING NOTES: 1. RIPRAP SLOPE SHALL BE SITE SPECIFIC. 2. RECOMMEND TOP ELEVATION OF RIPRAP BE SET AT 2-YEAR EVENT. MorningStar Mini-Storage Guilford County, North Carolina Leonard S. Rindner, PWS MECKLENBURG STORM WATER SERVICES Exhibit 17 OF 20 CHANNEL RESTORATION TECHNIQUES Date : April 28,1997 A? OF 6MIK P JOINT 4G (TYP.) OF SAW OF RIPRAP PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE RIPRAP JOINT PLANTING IT A//??MyMUL/Y Ir (TYp.) 7') D ON SECTION A-A MECKLENBURG STORM WATER SERVICES CHANNEL RESTORATION TECHNIQUES MorningStar Mini-Storage Guilford County, North Carolina Leonard S. Rindner, PWS Exhibit JIB OIL 20 Date : April 28, 1997 Y Y N b QI ? ? w 0 U I ' \ ' I . I i I If ? I \ I -r I I [ I' 7 f . = I I n . Ni s a,• P' \j ! I I , ? I I il? 91e E c le. ?{Y if? t ? / . I ' 1 1 b 6Fe : ?'Ye bz? i r 7 o ?P I. If ! = I I ? B I r'? I " I? I ? Y• I{]I I O e tt J 0 { I o II I I I I I !f e MorningStar Mini-Storage Guilford County, North Carolina Leonard S. Rindner, PWS Exhibit I q Otr 7-0 .v _ II . .-.._..-.._.._ 3AI60 O131l3NHl ?S(9i I! ... I I yf. I •' I . I _ I . I 1 .1 rw ? 6 ? ?1i:e ?q;' i II ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER KEY Date : April 28, 1997 24. List of Adjacent Property Owners: 1 - S. S. Clark, Sr., Property N/F Section 2 Dixie A. Hull PB 31 PG 45 DB 3481 PG 951 ,2 - S. S. Clark, Sr. Property N/F Section 2 Robert L. Stitz PB 31 PG 45 DB 2907 PG 308 3 - S. S. Clark, Sr. Property N/F Section 2 David Bartlett PB 31 PG 45 DB 3512 PG 2202 y- - S. S. Clark, Sr. Property N/F Park Strether K. Cox Section 2 DB 3657 PG 1614 PB 31 PG 45 S- Woodlea Acres Section 7 Flood Plain & Open Area PB 38 PG 14 G - N/F Albert Reeder DB 2549 PG 833 7 - N/F Walter Wayne Reeder DB 4259 PG 721 Refer to enclosed survey for locations of adjacent property owners. MorningStar Mini-Storage Guilford County, North Carolina Leonard S. Rindner, PWS Exhibit ZO 01= 20 LIST OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS Date : April 28, 1997 LanbDesign Engineering Services, Inc. May 13, 1997 Mr. Leonard S. Rindner, PWS Environmental Planning Consultant 7113 Hickory Nut Drive Raleigh, NC 27613 RE: Morningstar Mini-Storage Randleman Road, Greensboro, NC LDESI P.N. 76044 Dear Mr. Rindner: Please find the following reasons the above referenced site has been selected by Morningstar Group, Inc. for their next Mini-Storage Development and why there are no practical alternatives to that site. As you know, any commercial development has to meet certain minimum requirements to be successful. Obviously, one of the most important is site selection. Sites, such as the selected Randleman Road Site, requires adequate access, dimensions, and local zoning and development requirements. The marketplace is also essential. There needs to be a substantial customer base at the local level. Morningstar Group has been looking for just such a site in the Randleman Road area for the past two years. Other sites investigated have either been too small, did not have the required access or did not have the visibility requirement to the community. One site in particular, see attached map, was not zoned correctly and turned down for a rezoning petition. The Randleman Road site is ideal for Morningstar Group. It presents a highly visible site along a major roadway with a large number of residential and commercial patrons in close proximity to the site. It was for these reasons that Morningstar Group, after two years of research, decided that the Randleman Road site gave them the greatest possibility for success. 1700 East Boulevard 14-C Oak Branch Drive Charlotte, NC 28203 Greensboro, NC 27407 Telephone: 704.376.7777 Telephone: 910.855.5785 Fax: 704.376.8235 Fax: 910.855.1864 .a Mr. Leonard S. Rindner, PWS May 13, 1997 LDESI P.N. 76044 Page 2 Please feel free to incorporate this information in your report. Call if you have any additional questions. Thank you. Sincerely, Kevin W. Voge LandDesign Engineering Services, Inc. KWV/tmr ?A LanbDesio Engineering Services, Inc. DATE: May 5, 1997 TO: Len Rindner Environmental Planning Consultant FROM: Kevin Vogel, PE LandDesign Engineering Services, Inc. RE: Morningstar Mini-Storage Randleman Road Site The following is a list of additional certifications and approvals required for the above referenced project: 1. Planning approval through City of Greensboro Technical Review Committee - City of Greensboro Planning Department. 2. Grading Permit issued through City of Greensboro Inspections Department. 3. Driveway Permits issued through City of Greensboro and North Carolina State Department of Transportation. 4. Construction Drawing approval through City of Greensboro Engineering Department - Includes approval of water, sanitary sewer and storm drainage utilities. Keep in mind that watershed approval of this site is not required on a local level due to the fact that the site is not within a water quality watershed. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you KV/tr 1700 East Boulevard Charlotte, NC 28203 Telephone: 704.376.7777 Fax: 704.376.8235 14-C Oak Branch Drive Greensboro, NC 27407 Telephone: 910.855.5785 Fax: 910.855,1864