Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
20071113 Ver 1_U-3816 (3)_20050621
APPROVED: 364 lbs-- I Date/ Date V Palmer Road Extension From NC 211 at SR 1149 (East Pah-ner Road) To NC 20 at SR 1403 (Oakdale Gin Road) in Raeford City of Raeford, Hoke County WBS Element No. 34979.1.1. Federal Project No. STP-0831(2) State Project No. 8.2530301 T.I.P. PROJECT I1 -3816 ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION AND N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DivisjON OF HIGHWAYS Submitted pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c) �r,�,gor),J.�Th,rpe�,h. , �E,,io`um,,tl mental Director Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT 4 John F. Sullivan Ill, P.E., Division Administrator �Fedcral Highway Administration Palmer Road Extension From NC 211 at SR 1149 (East Palmer Road) To NC 20 at SR 1403 (Oakdale Gin Road) in Raeford City of Raeford, Hoke County WBS Element No. 34979. 1.1 Federal Project No. STP- 0831(2) State Project No. 8.2530301 T.I.P. PROJECT U -3816 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT March 2005 DOCUMENTATION PREPARED IN PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH WMI111tr, JA SEAT. '• 26985 S %.�ati/�vSr 9 e oiler M uller, P.E., Project Development Engineer ', v�' , �, • �¢; roject Development and Environmental Analysis Branch ���,�����;.•'��,��•� S. Eric Midkiff, P.E., Project Development Unit Head Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. TYPE OF ACTION .............................................. ............................... 1 II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION ...... ............................... 1 III. - SUMMARY OF ANTICIPATED BENEFICIAL AND ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ......................... 2 ............................... IV. COORIDINATION AND COMMENTS.......... .. ............................... 5 V. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ........ 8 VI. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT .............. 9 APPENDICES A. FIGURES B. CORRESPONDENCE TABLES TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ......................... ............................... 4 Palmer Road Extension From NC 211 at SR 1149 (East Palmer Road) To NC 20 at SR 1403 (Oakdale Gin Road) in Raeford City of Raeford Hoke County S Element �4o, 3 4979. 1. 1 F.A. Project No. STP-0831(2) State Pioject No. 8.2530301 T.I.P. Project No. U-3816 1. TYPE OF ACTION This is a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Administrative Action, Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). The FHWA has determined this project will not have any significant impact on the human environment. This FONSI is based on the Environmental Assessment, which has been independently evaluated by the FHWA and determined to adequately and accurately discuss the environmental issues and impacts of the proposed project. The Environmental Assessment provides sufficient evidence and analyses for determining that an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. The FHWA takes full responsibility for the accuracy, scope, and content of the Environmental Assessment. The improvements outlined in the Environmental Assessment for U -3816 will meet the purpose and need by enabling safer, more efficient traffic operations within the City of Raeford. 11. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), Division of Highways, and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) propose to construct a two-lane shoulder section of new location roadway referred to as the Palmer Road Extension. The limits of construction are from the intersection of NC 211 with SR 1149 (East Palmer Road) to the intersection of NC 20 with SR 1403 (Oakdale Gin Road), in Raeford. The total length of this project is 0.9 miles (1.448 km). Figure I illustrates a vicinity map of the project area. Figures 2A and 2B are aerial views of the project area showing the study corridor for the proposed new alignment for this project. Figures 3A through 3E show the preliminary design for the proposed extension. These figures are located in Appendix A. The preliminary design reflects Alternative A, recommended as preferred in the U-3816 Environmental Analysis signed in October 2003. Alternative A shows a grade separation at the Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad crossing. This alternative was chosen over Alternative B, an at grade railroad crossing, due to railroad crossing safety concerns and also in order to span a small amount of wetlands. This project is included in NCDOT's latest approved Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Right of way and construction are scheduled for federal fiscal years 2005 and 2006, respectively. The current total cost estimate for the proposed improvements is $4,238,125, consisting of $4,000,000 for construction and $238,125 for right of way acquisition. Preliminary designs indicate the relocation of no residences or businesses will be necessary for this project. There is no control of access proposed; meaning that Palmer Road can be accessed by any driveway or intersecting street. A proposed right-of-way width of 150 feet will be required for the Palmer Road Extension. The proposed right-of-way width will be 75 feet on each side of the proposed centerline. The proposed typical cross-section has one 12-foot wide travel lane in each direction, plus an 8-foot wide shoulder, four feet of which will be paved to accommodate bicycles. A bridge will span the railroad tracks. Ill. SUMMARY OF ANTICIPATED BENEFICIAL AND ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The construction of the Palmer Road Extension would be consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan for Hoke County and the City of Raeford's Land Development Plan. By constructing the Palmer Road Extension, there will be several positive impacts on the community. The Palmer Road Extension will create a more efficient route for the 16 school buses that travel within the project area, servicing students at West Hoke Middle School and Hoke High School. In addition, the improvement helps Emergency Medical Service and Fire Department vehicles to have a faster response time. The City of Raeford is encouraging development.for the immediate area surrounding the project. Currently, this area is zoned for farmland uses. The proposed corridor is undeveloped and has been designated as part of a future industrial park. The area has access to rail and the City of Raeford has recently installed new water lines in preparation for development associated with the industrial improvement. The City of Raeford is planning a city park north of the Palmer Road Extension, however the proposed project does not require any land acquisition from this future park. Truck traffic is a primary concern, as it creates congestion and safety concerns throughout the City. The Palmer Road Extension should alleviate many of these problems. The Palmer Road Extension will create improved mobility and safety for vehicles, particularly large commercial trucks that are currently negotiating the narrow lanes and tight radii of downtown Raeford. The completion of this project would help the City of Raeford and Hoke County Economic Development Commission in their efforts to attract new industry. The City of Raeford indicated that a loop, particularly the southern portion (the Palmer Road Extension), would spur more industrial growth in the area. 2 Indirect and cumulative impacts could be associated with this project. Indirect impacts to consider include the possibility of the development of industrial facilities within the project area. Local planning staff with the City of Raeford and on-site inspections confirmed that industrial development is anticipated and encouraged. The project area has been designated as an industrial park and the proposed extension will make the land accessible for development. New businesses located along the project corridor may bring additional jobs that would require more workforce in the area. This could create a greater demand for housing and might lead to increased residential development. The local city planning office should consider the possible negative effects of urban sprawl on the community in terms of uncontrolled growth and development along the project corridor. Indirect impacts from the loss of wetlands could include the long-term decline of sensitive vegetation and fauna. The project design will minimize the impact to the wetlands, The City of Raeford has stated that any wetland mitigation necessary might be integrated into the design of the proposed industrial park. The project proposes new construction of the roadway facility from NC 211 at SR 1149 (East Palmer Road) to NC 20 at SR 1403 (Oakdale Gin Road). For the year of 2025, the maximum distances to the 72-dBA and 67-dBA noise level contours are 37 feet and 76 feet from the center of the proposed roadway. Hence, no receptors are anticipated to approach or exceed the FHWA Noise Abatement Criteria and no noise sensitive receptors would experience substantial change in exterior noise levels per NCDOT Noise Abatement Policy. Based on past project experience and low traffic volumes, air quality is not expected to exceed the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Therefore, the project's impact on noise and air quality will not be significant. There are no historic structures or archaeological sites eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic Places in the project's Area of Potential Effect (APE), Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed Endangered, and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of March 7, 2002, the USFWS lists the following federally protected species for Hoke County: St. Francis satyr, red-cockaded woodpecker, Rough-leaved loosestrife, Michaux's sumac, and American chaffseed. All are classified as endangered in North Carolina. A determination of "NO EFFECT" has been made for each species based on biologists' field review of the proposed corridor for the Palmer Road Extension, with the exception of Michaux's sumac which has been changed to "MAY EFFECT- NOT LIKELY TO AFFECT" due to potential habitat present in the project study corridor. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has concurred with this finding (see letter in Appendix B). Wetlands were delineated in the field and mapped using the Global Positioning System (GPS). The proposed right of way is approximately 150 ft wide. Total impacts to wetlands within the proposed project area slope stake limits for the proposed grade separation alternative (the selected alternative) at the railroad crossing are 0.12 acres. See Table 1 on the following page for a summary of all direct impacts for U-3816. TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF DIRECT IMPACTS U-3816 Palmer Road Extension TYPE OF IMPACT Alternative A Grade Separation RESIDENTIAL RELOCATEES 0 BUSINESS RELOCATEES 0 SCHOOLS 0 CHURCHES PARKS CEMETARIES 0 0 0 NATIONAL REGISTER LISTED PROPERTIES 0 WETLANDS AFFECTED (HYDRIC SOILS) 0.12 ACRES ACRES HIGH QUALITY WATER ZONE ACRES WATER SUPPLY CRITICAL AREAS 0 0 STREAM IMPACTS (FT.) 0 AGRICULTURAL BIOTIC COMMUNITY 7.9 ACRES MESIC HARDWOOD FOREST 0.69 ACRES OLD FIELD 2.2 ACRES AIR QUALITY IMPACTS 0 NOISE IMPACTS 0 PROTECTED SPECIES 0 SANDHILLS PINE FOREST 1.2 ACRES LENGTH NEW LOCATION (MI.) INTERCHANGES 0.9 0 TOTAL LENGTH (MI.) 0.9 7� 0 IV. COORDINATION AND COMMENTS A. Circulation of the Environmental Assessment The Environmental Assessment was approved by the NCDOT Division of Highways and the FHWA on October 28, 2003. The approved Environmental Assessment was circulated to the following federal, state, and local agencies for review and comment. An asterisk ( *) indicates a written response was received from the agency. Copies of the correspondence received are included in the Appendix. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers * U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service * U. S. Environmental Protection Agency * N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission * N. C. Dept. of Cultural Resources N. C. Dept. of Public Instruction * N. C. Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Region N Planning Agency (MPO) City of Raeford Hoke County B. Comments Received on the Environmental Assessment 1. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Comment 1: Overall, the Service has minimal concern for this project. The Service supports NCDOT's preferred Alternative A since it has slightly less wetland impacts. Response: NCDOT has recommended Alternative A as the preferred alternative. Comment 2: Since potential habitat exists for Michaux's sumac, but no specimens were found during a plant survey at the project site on June 5, 2002, a "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" conclusion is more appropriate. An additional survey should be conducted for this species again within two years of actual project construction. The results of that survey should be submitted to our office for review. Response: The Natural Resources Technical Report has been revisAo reflect this (- conclusion for Michaux's sumac. In addition, an project commitment has been added 5 regarding a new survey for Michaux's sumac to be conducted within two years of actual project construction. 2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA Comment 1: EPA has not identified any substantial environmental concerns regarding the proposed project. However, we recommend that additional analysis and information be provided on prime and unique agricultural lands and any unresolved issues with the Oakdale Cotton Gin. NCDOT may also wish to explore the City of Raeford's request for bicycle shoulder widths in an area where such a use would not be potentially safe or compatible with other uses. Response: No prime or unique agricultural lands will be impacted by the project. Additionally, the Oakdale Cotton Gin has been sold and will no longer be operational. Bicycle lanes, in the form of a four -foot paved shoulder, are proposed due to plans by the City of Raeford to construct a city park in the northeast quadrant of the project area. The proposed project does not require any land acquisition from this future park. Comment 2: EPA recommends that a summary table of impacts be provided in the Finding of No Significant Impact Report (FONSI). Response: A brief summary of indirect and cumulative impacts is included in this report as requested. 3. N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission Comment 1: At this time we concur with the EA for this project. Response: Comment noted. Comment 2: All required DOT issued erosion and sedimentation "Approval Documents" must be carbon - copied to Mr. Ricky Revels, DWQ/FRO. It should be noted that "Approval Document" must address the need for a required NCG010000 "Construction Activity" Permit. Response: Comment noted. D 4. Division of Water QualitX Comment 1: DWQ questions why a route intended to divert truck traffic would include bicycle accommodation and wheelchair ramps. Response: As stated on page 12 of the Environmental Assessment for U -3816, the City of Raeford is planning a city park north of the Palmer Road Extension and has asked that NCDOT integrate bicycle plans into the proposed alignment. Comment 2: DWQ also prefers a roundabout to a signalized intersection as this would, if properly designed, expedite the movement of traffic through the intersection and provide a better level of service. Response: The intersection of proposed Palmer Road Extension and SR 1403 will be created due to the realignment of SR 1403. A roundabout design at this location will not work due to geometric restrictions caused by the proposed grade separation at the Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad. Comment 3: Direct impacts to wetlands and streams appear to be minimal. However, the number of house and business relocations, impacts to farms (agri- business) and loss of forested land is unknown. Response: The Environmental Assessment for U -3816 addresses the direct impacts. Also, see Table 1 on page 4 of this document for a summary of direct impacts. Comment 4: Because of the economic development component of the purpose and need, an analysis of the indirect and cumulative impacts may be required. Response: A brief summary of indirect and cumulative impacts is included in the Environmental Assessment. It is agreed that the improvement of the roadway might accelerate the rate of development along the corridor. Two items might serve to mitigate the possible future decrease in impervious surface area: 1. Integration of environmentally sensitive planning and design of the industrial park proposed to the south of the corridor 2. The construction of a city park to the north of the corridor. 7 C. Comments Received During and Following the Public Hearin An informal combined public hearing was held on July 29, 2004 from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. at the Hoke County Government Complex in Raeford. Approximately six people attended the hearing. One written comment was received from the City of Raeford. See Appendix B for the public notice and the handout information from the hearing. I. City Of Raeford The Palmer Road Extension would improve traffic flow on local streets and would allow for the development of a proposed City Park and industrial park. This project is important to the implementation of their year 2000 Water Improvement Plan. Response: Comment noted. V. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Minor revisions to the Environmental Assessment (EA) for this project include the following: I In the EA, there is a discrepancy on the number of trains going through the area. On page five, the EA specifies 4 trains per week, in one paragraph, but 4 trains per day in another. On page seven the EA again specifies 4 trains per week. Therefore, minor clarification was made that 4 trains per day travel through the project area on the Aberdeen and Rockfish Railroad (the "A&R"). 2. The following statement which had been omitted from the EA was added: No 303(4) streams within 1.0 miles of the project (Natural Resources Technical Report page 6) 3. The following statement which had been omitted from the EA was added: No NPDES dischargers within 1.0 miles of the project (Natural Resources Technical Report page 6) 4. The Biological Conclusion for Michaux's sumac was changed from No Effect to May Affect- Not Likely to Adversely Affect because of potential habitat present in the project study corridor. D'. VI. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Based upon a study of the impacts of the proposed project as documented in the Environmental Assessment and comments received from federal, state, and local agencies, it is the finding of the North Carolina Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration that this project will not have a significant impact upon the quality of the human or natural environment. The project is not controversial from an environmental standpoint. No significant impacts to natural, ecological, cultural, or scenic resources are expected. The proposed project is consistent with local plans and will not disrupt any communities. In view of the above evaluation, it ahs been determined a Finding of No Significant Impact is applicable for this project. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement will not be required. 9 r Hoke c r r Fort Bragg cc '06 r *•y �� � r ` r r � N A1 0 1 Mile Corridor Streams/ Rivers Roads i.:. • > Corporate limits 0 Demographic Study Area North Carolina Department of Transportation I' Division of Highways ,:. Project Development And Environmental Analysis Branch Figure 1 Project Location Map Raeford, Hoke County, North Carolina Palmer Road Extension from NC 211 at East Palmer Road (5R 1149) to NC 20 at Oakdale Gin Road ( 5R 1403) TI.P. project No. U -3816 To Fryatt�rElM Fort Brnyg To Southern Pin" PInihurnt y f3 Iew.tiprd ' 1 9702001` ;y e7oaoo4 9703005v �'a►r f �; Qa e 9704001 Ir To Leurrnhurg a n N a IticWlilE]fi! r� Dundarrach To ttnp* Lumberton N A1 0 1 Mile Corridor Streams/ Rivers Roads i.:. • > Corporate limits 0 Demographic Study Area North Carolina Department of Transportation I' Division of Highways ,:. Project Development And Environmental Analysis Branch Figure 1 Project Location Map Raeford, Hoke County, North Carolina Palmer Road Extension from NC 211 at East Palmer Road (5R 1149) to NC 20 at Oakdale Gin Road ( 5R 1403) TI.P. project No. U -3816 ri N N N N N N w N N N N Z 0 N N N N N I M N N PRELIMINARY DESIGN SP ALE I" = 100' ShH 6. BARTHTT &HIS$? Ml w LL �E say y O z � � cP ,Bl1S �� C � Bl1S SUS i -cAS io,000 i T \C�� 7 GAL �p��Py � �S ISM1 BST Z -CAC r nn I II �l Or EEE pul N0, ih'E;1 Np, E� fNEEi NO. oo# DuIGN "r " o1LE�iJ.a MiNfa ENGmm INCOMPLE PE PLANS CO NOT VA MR It dOONlmaN PRELIMM RY PLANS w NOT 0 ro oON!}Eumom �U5 �1 r lol LL -z o i i1 � (� J 4� I �`✓J FIGURE 3A ,app' � I I I I . � � I I � i I � � l III 7"", , 11 1 .ko:T'1',,,, ... -. :!P: F � ��r' E---�TOWEP E0 ISMILBUS �0 �Q Q� CI / t t t t# t t t } t t t i w040E t 1 # ttt tt tt it t t "t i k t t t t t ttt ttt t �t t t Litt tt� }} it i t k t t II t Ik t it ........ t t t t It tt r+l c "Mf7n r. g1L r Imo/ EUS Bus �sOL � II I BUS � DESEERNGH Iv H,IIIC BUS now dRuNa NG, ; r; •, •fin .�:. i u� II�Ft NO, 0DWtr QUIGN HooQua . ENGINEER XNER INCOMPLE E PLANS 00 NOT VdE Puq /A ACOMMM PRELIMM RY PLANS Po NoT UR ro MNMVMON t } t t r t I t / Itt tl t l� 0 r "-N SCALE 1 °= (00' PREL(MlNARY DESIGN FIGURE 3B 970Aq' IP 7990,09' � t I Y Ir t coo II k k 4 II k k i k t II I' 4 t BM�kI I 'I k t EEEV � 31,9' t k RR 4E t IN BJE COil I I } I I I t 'I k tk } # t it tt t w i i tt t t I k tt # t t t II tY t tt t t k I k t II t t uw m Na wOWWAT SON CRAM NS ION ,NS &W SHEET Nq, INER ., NS IWI INS iF aTP�N,�,NT 6F T F h 9 H X 9 MARCH a �$s United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Raleigh Field Office Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636.3726 December 31, 2003 Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. Project Development and Environmental Analysis North Carolina Department of Transportation 1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1548 Dear Dr. Thorpe: R i cc 'ti d f This letter is in response to your November 26, 2003 letter requesting comments from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed extension of Palmer Road from NC 211 at SR 1149 (East Palmer Road) to NC 20 at SR 1403 (Oakdale Gin Road) in Raeford, Hoke County, North Carolina (TIP No. U- 3816). These comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 -667d) and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531- 1543). The EA addresses two build alternatives, both 09 miles long. Both utilize the same horizontal alignment. Alternative A utilizes a grade separation (bridge) at the railroad crossing, while Alternative B utilizes an at -grade intersection at the railroad crossing. The North Carolina Department of Transportation's ( NCDOT) preferred alternative is A. From the information and aerial photograph provided, it appears that most of the alignment will be placed in open agricultural lands. Wetland impacts are minimal: Alternative A with 0.12 acres of impact and Alternative B with 0.33 acres of impact. No stream impacts will occur. It also appears that a relatively small amount of wildlife habitat in the form of approximately 1.9 acres of fragmented forest will be impacted. Overall, the Service has minimal concern for this project. The Service supports NCDOT's preferred Alternative A since it has slightly less wetland impacts. There are five federally endangered species listed for Hoke County: the red - cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Saint Francis' satyr (Neonympha mitchelhi francisci), American chaffseed (Schwalbea americana), rough- leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia) and Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii). NCDOT has determined that the proposed project will have no effect on these five species. Due to the lack of habitat, the Service concurs that the project will have no effect on the red - cockaded woodpecker, Saint Francis' satyr, American chaffseed and rough- leaved loosestrife. However, since potential habitat exists for Michaux's sumac, but •sir• �' '�r :�.'•i: This letter is in response to your November 26, 2003 letter requesting comments from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed extension of Palmer Road from NC 211 at SR 1149 (East Palmer Road) to NC 20 at SR 1403 (Oakdale Gin Road) in Raeford, Hoke County, North Carolina (TIP No. U- 3816). These comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 -667d) and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531- 1543). The EA addresses two build alternatives, both 09 miles long. Both utilize the same horizontal alignment. Alternative A utilizes a grade separation (bridge) at the railroad crossing, while Alternative B utilizes an at -grade intersection at the railroad crossing. The North Carolina Department of Transportation's ( NCDOT) preferred alternative is A. From the information and aerial photograph provided, it appears that most of the alignment will be placed in open agricultural lands. Wetland impacts are minimal: Alternative A with 0.12 acres of impact and Alternative B with 0.33 acres of impact. No stream impacts will occur. It also appears that a relatively small amount of wildlife habitat in the form of approximately 1.9 acres of fragmented forest will be impacted. Overall, the Service has minimal concern for this project. The Service supports NCDOT's preferred Alternative A since it has slightly less wetland impacts. There are five federally endangered species listed for Hoke County: the red - cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Saint Francis' satyr (Neonympha mitchelhi francisci), American chaffseed (Schwalbea americana), rough- leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia) and Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii). NCDOT has determined that the proposed project will have no effect on these five species. Due to the lack of habitat, the Service concurs that the project will have no effect on the red - cockaded woodpecker, Saint Francis' satyr, American chaffseed and rough- leaved loosestrife. However, since potential habitat exists for Michaux's sumac, but no specimens were found during a plant survey at the project site on June 5, 2002, a "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" conclusion is more appropriate. An additional survey should be conducted for this species again within two years of actual project construction. The results of that survey should be submitted to our office for review. We believe that the requirements of section 7 (a)(2) of the ESA have been satisfied for now. We remind you that obligations under section 7 consultation must be reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered in this review; (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action. The Service believes that this EA adequately addresses the existing fish and wildlife resources, the waters and wetlands of the United States, and the potential impacts of this proposed project on these resources. The Service appreciates the opportunity to review this project. If you have any questions regarding our response, please contact Mr. Gary Jordan at (919) 856 -4520, ext. 32. Sincerely, Garland B. Pardue, Ph.D. Ecological Services Supervisor cc: Chris Militscher, USEPA, Raleigh, NC Travis Wilson, NCWRC, Creedmoor, NC Beth Barnes, NCDWQ, Raleigh, NC Richard Spencer, USAGE, Wilmington, NC David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington, NC U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGEN Region 4 5E" Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, S.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8909 MaR 4 2004 March 1, 2004 �o A aIV00NOF .h ( y IGHW4Y5 Dr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. �'r�9 L A N A4 Environmental Manager Director, Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch N.C. Department of Transportation 1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1548 SUBJ: EPA Review of the Federal Environmental Assessment for the Palmer Road Extension from NC 211 to NC 20, Raeford, in Hoke County; Federal Aid Project No. STP- 0831(2), State Project No. 8.2530301, T.I.P. Project No. U- 3816 Dear Dr. Thorpe: Pursuant to Section 309 of the Clean Air Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reviewed the referenced North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Palmer Road Extension, Raeford, in Hoke County. The EA addresses the No -build alternative and two construction alternatives (Alternative A includes a 2 -lane facility with a grade separation (bridge) at the railroad crossing and Alternative B which includes 2 -Iane facility with an at -grade intersection). The length of the new Iocation extension project is approximately 0.9 miles. Two -foot bike lanes along the shoulders are also being provided. The proposed project is a non - Merger Team project. EPA offers the following comments on the EA. EPA has no environmental concerns regarding the project's overall purpose and need and the general alternatives considered as outlined in the EA. However, EPA notes that part of the purpose and need for the project is to divert truck traffic from Raeford. This use incompatible with bicycle lanes as requested by local officials. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT Impacts to wetlands (0.12 acres for NCDOT's preferred Alternative A) appear to be minimal and there is one intermittent stream (Unnamed tributary to Peddlers Branch) within the study area but it is not expected to be impacted from the proposed project.. There are no residential or business relocations. There are no impacts expected to noise receptors, air quality, historic or cultural resources, hazardous material sites or endangered species. From the aerial photographs shown in Figures 2A and 2B, the project would appear to impact farmlands and terrestrial forests. There is no analysis of the potential impacts to these resources in the body of the EA. According to the Natural Resource Technical Report (NRTR) in Appendix B, Page 9, the impacts to forest communities are approximately 1.9 acres, including Sandhills Pine Forest and Mesic Hardwood Forest. Also identified in this table, impacts to agricultural lands are 7.9 acres. However, there is no analysis or discussion contained in the EA or NRTR if these agricultural lands are considered prime or unique. There is a letter of concern dated July 6, 2001, from the Oakdale Cotton Gin in Appendix C that would indicate that the proposed project alignment would substantially impact their farming operations. NCDOT needs to provide further information on the status of prime and unique agricultural lands. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES EPA has not identified any substantial environmental concerns regarding the proposed project. However, we recommend that additional analysis and information be provided on prime and unique agricultural lands and any unresolved issues with the Oakdale Cotton Gin. NCDOT may also wish to explore the City of Raeford's request for bicycle shoulder widths in an area where such a use would not be potentially safe or compatible with other uses. Furthermore, we recommend that a summary table of impacts be provided in the FNSI. This summary table is consistent with the recommendations being developed by the joint Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), NCDOT and EPA work group on NEPA document streamlining. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this EA. Should you have questions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact Christopher Militscher of my staff at 919 -856 -4206. Sincerely, (�� 4-- Heinz J. Mueller, Chief NEPA Program Office Office of Policy and Management --'La L1 MEMORANDUM R P.gC1111 rPC Charlas R Fulhroc)d, Bz"utivo Dircctm TO: Melba McGee Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs, DENR FROM: Travis Wilson, Highway Project Coordinator Habitat Conservation Prograrn �— r DATE: January 2, 2004 SUBJECT: North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Environmental Assessment (EA) for the extension of Palmer Road from NC 211 to NC 20 in Raeford, Hoke County, North Carolina. TiP Na. U -3816, SCH Project No. 04- 0155, Staff biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject EA and are familiar with habitat values in the project area. The purpose of this review was to assess project impacts to fish and wildlife resources. Our comments are provided in accordance with certain provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as a„iended., 16 U.S.C. 661- 667d). NCDOT proposes to extend Palmer Road from NC 211 at $,It i 1.49 cQ NC 20 at S,R 1403, the project will be constructed as a two -lane shoulder facility. The total project .length is approximately 0.4 miles. The construction of this project will impact 0. 12 acres of wetlands for alternative A and 0.33 acres for alternative B, there will be no impacts to perennial streams. We have reviewed the data in the EA. Due to the urban nature of this project site the environmental impacts are n1itl.imal: At this time, we concur with the EA for this project. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this EA. If we can be of any further assistance please call me at (919) 528 -9886. cc: Gary Jordan, U.S. Fisb and Wildlife Service, Raleigh Jahn Hennessy, DWQ, Raleigh Richard Spencer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Mailing Addres.a: Division of Niand Fisheries • 1721 Mad Service Center • Raleigh, N(71 27699 -17? 1 Telephone: (9191 733 -5631 c:c. 231 - Fax: (519) 711.7543 NCDENR Department of Environment and Natural Resources INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS Project Number: 0 �4' /s pueDace; 0 / o < < c After review of this project it has been determined that the DEAR permit(s) and /or approvals indicated may need to be obtained in order for this project w comply with North Carolina Law. Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of this Fo All applications, information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same Regional Office. rm. ! PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS Normal Process Time facilities and/or Emission Sources as per 15 A NCAC NIA (5tatutoryTime Limit) Permit to construct & operate wastewater treatment Application 90 days before begin construction or award of construction facilities, sewer system extensions & sewer systems contracts. On -site inspection. Post - application technical conference usual. 30 days not discharging into state surface waters. (90 days) 1 NPOES- permit to discharge into surface water and /or Application 180 days before begin activity. On -site inspection preappllcation % permit to operate and construct wastewater facilities conference usual. Additionally, obtain permit to construct wastewater -treatment 90 -120 days f discharging into state surface waters. facility- granted after NPOES. Reply time, 30 days after receipt of plans at issue (N /A) W C- & 0 I r eo 0 of NPDES permit- whichever is later, (90 days) 0 Water Use Permit Preapplication technical conference usually necessary 30 days I Complex Source Permit required under 15 A NCAC (N(A) Well Construction Permit Complete application must be received and permit issued prior to the. 7 days installation of a weiL {15 day,; ❑ Dredge and Fill Permit Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property owner. On -site inspection. Preapplication conference usual. Filing may require Easement 55 days to Fill from N.0 Department of Administration and Federal Dredge and Fill Permit. (90 days) r I Permit to construct & operate Air Pollution Abatement facilities and/or Emission Sources as per 15 A NCAC NIA 60 days (20.0100, 20,0300, 21•i.0600) Any open burning associated with subject proposal must be in compliance with 15 A NCAC 2D.1900 1 Demolition or renovations of structures containing % asbestos material must be in compliance with f 15 A_ NCAC 2D.1110 (a) (1) which requires notification NIA 60 days and removal prior to demolition. Contact Asbestos (90 days) Control Group 919- 733.0820, I Complex Source Permit required under 15 A NCAC 20.0800 _ i,,� " The Sedlmentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity. An erosion & sedimentation { control plan will be required if one or more acres to be disturbed Plan filed with proper Regional Office (Land Ouali Section) at least 30 , 20 days 1 days before beginning activity. A fee of $40 for the first acre or any part of an acre - S r ti JZi� (30 days) The 54•:!Imentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be addressed with respect to the referenced Local Ordinance 30 days Q Mining Permit 11 -cite inspection usual. Surety band fill e! with DENPL Bond amount varies with I type mine and number of acres of affected land. Any are mined greater than 30 days one acre must be permitted. The appropriate bond must be received before (60 days) i the permit can be issued. " North Carolina Burning permit On -site inspection by N.C. Division of Forest Resources if permit exceeds 4 days 1 day (NIA) Special Ground Clearance Burning Permit -22 counties On -site Inspection by N.COlvision of Forest Resources required -1f more than five 1 day i In coastal N.C_ with organic soils. acres of ground clearing activities are Involved Inspections should be requested (WA) at least ten days before actual burn is planned." ❑ I Oil Refining Facilities ,t N/A 90 -120 days (NIA) (� Dam Safety Permit if permit required, apptlmtlon 60 days before begin constructlon. Applicant must hire N.C. qualified - engineer to: prepare plant ,lnspectconstruction,certify construction Is according to DENR approved plans. May also require permit under mosquito control program, and a 404 permit from Corps of Engineers. 30 days An inspection of site is necessary to verify Hazard Classification. A minimum (60 days) fee of S2t>a.00 must accompany the application. An addklona( processing fee based on a percentage or the total Project cost will be required upon completion. �..i "_rm;; .0 or"' z'rpioratcry oii or gas weii Ale surety bond of $5,CC0 with OENR running m Stare of N.0 conditional that any top ' d by drill operator shall, upon abandonment, be plugged according CO OENR rules and regulations, 10 days CJ Geophysical Exploration Permit (111,4) Application filed with OENR at least 10 days prior to issue of permit: Application by letter. No standard application form. 10 days ❑ State lakes Construction Permit (NIA) Application fees based an structure size is charged. Must include descriptions & drawings of structure & proof of ownership of riparian property, 15 - 20 days 401 WaterQuafityCertificatfon (NIA) NIA 55 days ❑ CAMA Permit for MAJOR development 030 days) $250.00 fee must accompany application 60 days ❑ CAMA Permit for MINOR development (130 days) $50.00 fee must accompany application 22 days ❑ Several geodetic monuments are located in or near the (25 days) project area. If any monument needs to be moved or destroyed, please notify; 'N.C. Geodetic Survey,, Box 27687 Raleigh, N.C. 27611 ❑ Abandonment of any welts, if required must be in accordance with Tide 15A. Subchapter 1C.0100, (1 Notification of the proper regional office is requested if'orphan' underarnund storage tanks (UTM are discovered during excavation 9 an Y operation. ❑ Compliance with 15A NCAC 2H 1000 (Coastal S[ormwater Rules) is required 45 days * Y .;4,,eT 44 Other cor�menu (attach additional pages as necessary, being certain to cite comment authority) (NIA) D, 0, r , :..�. w ' frrr` s• �., � 1i3.: a,+. ,� 1y- n.l w S r :� _ Cc - <�r�i � d �a /GIY. 'e c! A. in :_ N.:.f�ei �%i.lT ffre•'G�i UJC ..'.i.� --a T< 'Yd:5TH 4dc�s✓jl t� a ",f eri - :'-rte . �;t� � �n - y. r� _L- N ee) 0 'j JT C..[, a i l /7- 2tX3; REGIONAL OFFICES Questions regarding these Permits should be addressed to the Regional Office marked hpinw ❑Asheville Regional Office 59 Woodfn Place Asheville, N.C.28801- (828) 251 -6208 ❑ Mooresville Regional Office 919 North Main Street Mooresville, N.C- 28115 (704) 663 -1699 ' ❑ Wilmington Regional Office 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, N.C.28405 (910) 395 -3900 ❑ Fayetteville Regional Office ❑ Raleigh Regional Office 225 Green Street, Suite 71.4 ©Winston -5alem Regional Office 3800 Barrett Drive, P.Q. Box 276$7 Fayetteville, N.C. 28301 Raleigh, N,C.2761.1.:• {91.0) 486 -1541 585 Waughtown Street Winston- Salem, N.C. 27107 (919) 571 X700 (336) 771 -4600 ❑ Washington Regional Office 943 Washington Square Mall Washington, N.C. 27889 (252) 946 -6481 . N STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTIVENT OF TRANSPORTATION MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDOTIPPETT GOVERNOR JULY 29, 2004 SECRETARY DEAR CITIZEN: THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING THIS OPEN -FORUM PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED PALMER ROAD EXTENSION. A TWO -LANE ROADWAY WITH SHOULDERS IS PLANNED FOR MOST OF THE PROJECT; HOWEVER, ADDITIONAL TURN LANES ARE PROPOSED AT BOTH THE PALMER ROAD/ NC 211 AND PALMER ROAD/NC 20 INTERSECTIONS. IN ADDITION, A BRIDGE IS PROPOSED CROSSING THE ABERDEEN & ROCKFISH RAILROAD. OAKDALE GIN ROAD WILL BE REALIGNED PROVIDING IMPROVED VISABILITY AND SAFETY. CONTAINED IN THIS HANDOUT PACKAGE IS INFORMATION ABOUT THE PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT, THE LOCATIONIDESIGN, AND RIGHT OF WAY PROCEDURES. YOU ARE INVITED TO READ THE MATERIAL TO BECOME ACQUAINTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. THE PROJECT BEGINS AT THE EXISTING WEST PALMER ROAD /NC 211 INTERSECTION AND PROCEEDS IN AN EASTERLY DIRECTION ON NEW LOCATION, CROSSES THE ABERDEEN & ROCKFISH RAILROAD, AND ENDS AT NC 20 AT THE EXISTING OAKDALE GIN ROAD INTERSECTION --A TOTAL DISTANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 1.3 MILE. AS PART OF THIS PROJECT, OAKDALE GIN ROAD WILL BE REALIGNED INTERSECTING PALMER ROAD EXTENSION APPROXIMATELY 1300 FEET WEST OF THE: CURRENT NC 20 INTERSECTION. UPON COMPLETION OF THE REALIGNMENT, APPROXIMATELY 1800 FEET OF EXISTING OAKDALE GIN ROAD WILL BE REMOVED. A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION AND DESIGN ALTERNATIVE IS AVAILABLE FOR YOU TO REVIEW. REPRESENTATIVES OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ARE AVAILABLE TO DISCUSS THE PROJECT AND ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PLANNING/DESIGN. REPRESENTATIVES OF THE RIGHT OF WAY BRANCH ARE AVAILABLE TO DISCUSS THIS AREA AND TO ADDRESS YOUR QUESTIONS. THE PURPOSE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING IS TO SEEK YOUR THOUGHTS ON THE PROPOSED PROJECT. YOU MAY PROVIDE THEM BY USING THE COMMENT SHEET IN YOUR HANDOUT. WRITTEN COMMENTS MAY BE SUBMITTED TO THE MEETING MODERATOR, DEPOSITED IN THE DESIGNATED CONTAINER, OR MAILED WITHIN THE NEXT 15 DAYS TO THE ADDRESS SHOWN ON THE COMMENT SHEET. ALL COMMENTS WILL BECOME PART OF THE PUBLIC RECORD. AGAIN, I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING THE OPEN -HOUSE PUBLIC HEARING AND FOR GIVING US YOUR COMMENTS. A DECISION ON THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL BE MADE IN THE NEAR FUTURE. MAILING ADDRESS: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HUMAN ENVIRONMENT 1583 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH NC 27699 -1583 SINCERELY, LEN HENDRICKS PUBLIC HEARING OFFICER TELEPHONE: 919- 715 -1500 FAX: 919 - 715 -1522 WESS1TE' WWW,NCDQT.ORG LOCATION: PARKER LINCOLN BLOfi 272R CAPITAL BLVD RALEIGH NC 271504 r PURPOSE OF PROJECT The primary- purpose of the project is to improve traffic flow south of Raeford by providing a continuous route frori NC -211 to NC 2Q:. lrr addition, the project will provide regional connectivity between US 1 and 1 -95 and local connectivity between other circumferential roadways in Hoke County linking industries that are planned for this area. The proposed extension will improve safety by removing truck and other through traffic accessing US 401 and 1 -95 via NC 20 from local streets The project will provide access foi proposed development in this area, including a city park planned for the northeastem quadrant and an industrial park planned for the southeastern quadrant. The proposed action will allow Palmer Road- to operate as a major thoroughfare. PURPOSE OF PUBLIC HEARING Tonight's hearing is one step in the Department of Transportation's procedure for making you, the public, a part of the planning process. The Department of Transportation is soliciting your views on the proposed location /design of the Palmer Road Extension from NC 211 to NC 20. The Department of Transportation's views on the above project are set forth in the environmental document — Environmental Assessment. A copy of this report and a copy of the public hearing map is available for public review in the Hoke County Government Complex located at 227 North Main Street in Raeford and in the City of Raeford Government Complex located at 315 North Main Street in Raeford. YOUR PARTICIPATION Several representatives of the North Carolina Department of Transportation are present at this meeting. Any of these people will be happy to talk with you, explain the proposal to you, and answer your questions. Now that the opportunity is here, you are encouraged to participate by voicing your comments to Department of Transportation representatives at this meeting, by writing them on the comment sheet and placing it in the designated box, or mailing them during the 15 days following the public hearing. Those wishing to submit written material may do so to: Mr. Len Hendricks Public Hearing Officer NCDOT Public Involvement Unit 1583 Mai( Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1583 Telephone: (919) 715 -1594 FAX: (919) 715 -1501 email: Hendricks@dot.state.nc.us WHAT IS, DONE WITH THE INPUT? A post-hearing-meeting will be conducted after the comment period. has ended. This meeting will be attended by.NCDOT staff representing_ Planning, Design, Traffic, Right of Way, Public Involvement, and others wha play .a role in the development of a project. When appropriate, representatives from the Federal Highway- Administration and local governmental officials also attend. All spoken and written issues are discussed at this meeting. Most issues are resolved at the post hearing meeting The Department of Transportation considers safety, costs, traffic service, social impacts, and public comments in making decisions. Complex issues may require additional study and may be reviewed by higher management .Board of TranVortation Members, andlor the Secretary of Transportation. Minutes of the post - hearing meeting are prepared and this summary is available to the public. You may request this document- on the attached comment sheet. STATE - FEDERAL RELATIONSHIP This proposed project is a Federal -Aid Highway Project and thus will be constructed under the State - Federal Aid Highway Program. Financing of this project will be 80% Federal Funds and 20% State Funds. The Board of Transportation is responsible for the selection and scheduling of projects on the Federal Aid System, their location, design, and maintenance cost after construction. The Federal Highway Administration is responsible for the review and approval of the previously mentioned activities to ensure that each Federal Aid Project is designed, constructed, and maintained to Federal Aid Standards. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DfVISION OF HIGHWAYS c PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH U- 3816 RAEFORD PALMER ROAD EXTENSION FROM NC 211 AT SR 1149 TO NC 20 AT SR 1403 HOKE COUNTY w � s ■ r ■ a ■ r • r i • r • r Length: Typical Section: PROJECT INFORMATION 1.27 Miles From NC 211 To NC 20; Two Lanes - Shoulders Each Lane 12` Wide 8' Wide/4' Paved 'Paved Shoulders May Be Used For Bicycle Traffic Oakdale Gin Road Realignment Two Lanes - Shoulders Each Lane 12' Wide B' Wide Right of Way: 150 Feet "Construction Easements Will Be Required Along Both NC 211 And NC 20 For Intersection Improvements Reiocatees: Estimated Cost: Residences: 0 Businesses: 0 Total 0 Right of Way: $ 238,125 Roadway 3,163,000 Structure 837,000 Total $ 4,238,125 Tentative Schedule: Right of Way: August, 2005 Construction: August, 2007 TYPICAL SECTION Palmer Road Extension From NC 299 To NC 20 I 4,- PALMM ID. E1 TINSION Yi- MAIN ST. Y2= HWY 211E - Y4- NC 20 Ylrr- ST. PAULS ItD. TYPICAL SECTION Oakdale Gin Road Realignment From Approximately 9800 Feet Southwest of NC 20 Intersection Intersecting Palmer Road Extension Approximately 9300 Feet West of NC 20 Intersection t• r i i i• r • a •• �• lThs a a Oyical erargpltlor p n�jarPrgi�ct The ataralprvxss and pu6lc irwoAement 4 t+es are establsl+ed cur an;grxopr+aee kre) for earl project based on its corrtolexq ar�d�+ WYw7iTacmrcbncewithfederrrardstataJegalrequiemers ¢} - �— rndiaasryP�F+ r�P +�+Pa�+���P�'�4�sPecificprajecU 6 Dcsteiop Local A Thorraughfaee. Plan Study Initiation - - Conduct initial field trip -- Meet with local policy boards and technical staff *-- Conduct goals and objectives survey — Establish local steering committee (upon local request) Data Collection — Collect socio- economic data (land use, population, traffic volumes and employment data) — Collect transportation network data Research environmental and cultural concerns — Receive input from various local area sources (needs, problems, concerns, etc.) — local area develops future year socio- economic forecasts Data Analysis — Model existing transportation network — Generate design year transportation information — Conduct deficiency analysis Discuss Findings with local Area Policy Boards, Technical Staff, and Public . o — Discuss deficiencies with local area • — Discuss possible alternative solutions Plan Development — Develop alternative plans — Review project impacts — Conduct cost - benefit analyses — Discuss alternatives with local area staff and policy boards • -- Conduct public information workshop(s) — Discuss and resolve pubic comments with local staff — Select recommended plan in cooperation with local staff and policy boards Plan Adoption — Local government conducts public hearing(s) •— Present plan for adoption by local government and the North Carolina Board of Trartsportat ion Plan Implementation — local government - enforces land use controls • — Present project requests through TIP process 1111. Develop Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) • — Local. governments select priorities to in -dude in TIP 0 — Board of Transportation holds annual public meetings statewide to update the previous year's TIP — Transcribe comments and material received at public meetings, and submit to Transportation Board Transportation Board members work with NCDOT staff to update TIP • — Release draft Transportation improvement Program to the press, public and governments for review. — Finalize TIP following comments — Board of Transportation adopts state TIP 9 — Metropolitan Planning Organizations receive public comment and approve local 11P — Secretary of Transportation approves local TIPS Ill:. Develop EnvinmummoW Doamrtier� Notify Public and Government Agencies of Project Study 0 — Hold citizen information workshops — Evaluate comments received at workshops • — Form citizen's advisory group to get local citizens involved (upon local request) Select corridors to be studied identify feasible corridors and evaluate costs and environmental impacts — Hold information workshop on selected corridors NCDOT staff uses recommendations from local citizens, governments and state agencies to prepare a draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or Environmental Assessment (EA) Prepare Draft Environmental Document e — Make draft EIS or EA, which addresses the impacts of each corridor, available to public and send to review agendes and local officials for comment • — Hold public hearing on location of corridor (Z &-day comment period follows public hearing) — NCDOT holds post hearing meeting and a corridor is recommended using technical data and information received in conjunction with the public hearing — Notify public of selected corridor Prepare Final Environmental Document — Begin preliminary design of highway in selected corridor (1) — If final ELWnding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) required, send to State Clearinghouse (N.C. Dept of Administration) and federal agencies for 30-day comment period — Send notification of Final EIS to Review Agencies and Federal Register — Publish record of decision on preliminary design using comments from public, review agencies and the FHWA • — Hold public hearing on project design (lMay public comment period follows public hearing) (1) — Hold post hearing meeting where any changes in design are made if necessary. (1) mime steps am wrnbwd wide corridor location for axw snatier prolem Queswrd? Ca# Gwen Pamcpaaon urur 1919) 250 -4092 North Carolina Oepamment of Transportation, P.Q. aox 2.5201 Raleigh, N.0 27611 211196 Right of Way Acquisition; - Final Design Plans are Prepared Construction RIGHT OF WAY PROCEDURES After decisions are made regarding the final design, the proposed right of way limits will be staked in the ground. Affected owners of property will be contacted by a Right of Way Agent and a meeting will be arranged. The agent will explain the plans and the Property owner will be advised as to how the project will affect him. The agent will inform you of your rights as a property owner. If permanent right of way is required, professionals who are familiar with real estate values will evaluate or appraise your property. The evaluations or appraisals will be reviewed for completeness and accuracy and then a written offer will be made to you by the Right of Way Agent. The current market value of the property at its highest and best use when it is appraised will be offered as compensation. The Department of Transportation must: 1. Treat all owners and tenants equally. 2. Fully explain the owner's rights. 3. Pay just compensation in exchange for property rights. 4. Furnish relocation advisory assistance. RELOCATION ASSISTANCE If you are a relocatee, that is, if your residence or business is to be acquired as a part of the project, additional assistance in the form of advice and compensation is available. You will also be provided with assistance on locations of comparable housing and/or commercial establishments, moving procedures, and moving aid. Moving expenses may be paid for you. Additional monetary compensation is available to help homeowners cope with mortgage increases, increased value of comparable homes, closing costs, etc. A similar program is available to assist business owners. The Right of Way Agent can explain this assistance in greater detail. NOTE: PAMPHLETS SUMMARIZING RIGHT OF WAY AND RELOCATION PROCEDURES ARE AVAILABLE AT THE MODERATOR'S TABLE. Palmer Road Extension From NC 211 To NC 20 July 29, 2064 U -3816 Hoke County WBS Element 34979.1.1 Project 8.2530301 NAME: ADDRESS: COMMENTS AND /OR QUESTIONS: Comments may be mailed to: Len Hendricks, Public Hearing Officer N. C. Department of Transportation, Public Involvement Unit 1583 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1583 Telephone: (919) 715 -1594 FAX; (919) 715 -1501 email: Ihend ricks @dot. state. nc. us