5503_LincolnCoCDLF_GWMR_DIN27917_20161017 (2)

October 2016 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill - Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Prepared for:
Lincoln County
5291 Crouse Road
Crouse, North Carolina 28033
Prepared by:
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
January 13, 2017
S&ME, Inc. | 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard | Charlotte, NC 28273 | p 704.523.4726 | f 704.525.3953 | www.smeinc.com
January 13, 2017
Lincoln County
5291 Crouse Road
Crouse, North Carolina 28033
Attention:Mr. Mark Bivins
Reference:October 2016 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Dear Mr. Bivins:
S&ME Inc. (S&ME) has completed the October 2016 Semi-Annual Monitoring and Reporting for the
Lincoln County Landfill. This report presents the results of the second monitoring event of the year for the
facility.
S&ME appreciates the continued opportunity to provide services to you and Lincoln County. If you have
any questions or need additional information regarding this report, please contact us at [phone].
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
Jasmine Tayouga, E.I.Edmund Q.B. Henriques, L.G.
Staff Professional Senior Geologist
NC Registration No. 1216
Cc: Jaclynne Drummond, NCDENR – Solid Waste Section
October 2016 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
January 13, 2017 ii
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................1
2.0 Groundwater Levels and Flow............................................................................1
3.0 Analytical Data ......................................................................................................1
3.1 Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling......................................................................1
3.1.1 MSW Area “E” and Phase 1...............................................................................................1
3.1.1.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)...........................................................................2
3.1.1.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals).....................................................................................3
3.1.2 MSW Phase 2......................................................................................................................4
3.1.2.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)...........................................................................4
3.1.2.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals).....................................................................................4
3.1.3 MSW Phase 3......................................................................................................................4
3.1.3.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)...........................................................................4
3.1.3.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals).....................................................................................5
3.1.4 C&D Landfill Phase 1 and 2...............................................................................................5
3.1.4.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)...........................................................................5
3.1.4.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals).....................................................................................5
3.1.4.3 Classical Chemistry Compounds...................................................................................6
3.2 Surface Water Sampling..................................................................................................6
3.2.1 Surface Water Locations SW-1 through SW-5...................................................................6
3.2.2 Surface Water Location SW-6.............................................................................................6
3.3 Leachate Sampling............................................................................................................7
4.0 Statistical Analysis................................................................................................7
4.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)...........................................................................7
4.2 Total Metals.......................................................................................................................8
5.0 Methane Readings.................................................................................................8
October 2016 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
January 13, 2017 iii
Appendices
Appendix I – Drawings
Appendix II –Tables
Appendix III – Well Sampling Logs and Laboratory Reports
Appendix IV – Statistical Analysis Procedures
Appendix V – Graphs Depicting Concentrations over Time for Wells with a Statistically Significant
Increase
Appendix VI – Monthly Methane Data (April 2016 – October 2016)
October 2016 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
January 13, 2017 1
1.0 Introduction
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) was contracted by Lincoln County to provide groundwater, surface water, and leachate
monitoring services at the Lincoln County Landfill located at 5291 Crouse Road in Crouse, North Carolina.
This semi-annual monitoring event was conducted on October 17
th through 19
th, 2016.
This report presents the results of the second semi-annual sampling event for the year 2016 at the facility.
The facility’s monitoring network includes one background well (MW-1A), twenty-nine compliance wells,
six (6) surface water sample locations, and one leachate sample. The next sampling event is scheduled for
April 2017.
2.0 Groundwater Levels and Flow
The water table elevations and our interpretation of the groundwater surface expressed as a
potentiometric map along with groundwater flow direction are shown on Drawing 1 of 1 in Appendix I.
Based upon the groundwater elevations in the vicinity of the landfill, groundwater in this area is projected
to flow primarily to the south, with secondary flow toward the southwest and southeast toward tributaries
located east and west of the landfills. Groundwater levels for the monitoring wells are presented in Table
1 in Appendix II.
The hydraulic gradient (i) in the vicinity of each well was estimated by calculating the vertical difference
between the groundwater elevation at each well and one or more nearby contour lines from Drawing 1
of 1. This value was then divided by the horizontal distance measured from the well to the selected
groundwater elevation contour line. Groundwater velocity was calculated by multiplying the gradient (i)
by the hydraulic conductivity (k) and dividing by the estimated effective porosity (ne) of the aquifer.Table
2 in Appendix II summarizes the groundwater flow rates for the monitoring wells.
3.0 Analytical Data
Analytical results for the landfill monitoring wells, surface water samples, and leachate sample are
summarized in Tables 4 through 10 in Appendix II. Detections above the NCAC 2L .0202 Groundwater
Quality Standards (2L Standards), NCAC 2B surface water standards (2B Standards), and/or SW GWP
Standard are highlighted in gray. Field measurements of pH, conductivity, and temperature are
summarized in Table 3 in Appendix II. Well sampling logs containing this information are included in
Appendix III.
3.1 Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling
3.1.1 MSW Area “E” and Phase 1
MSW Area “E” and Phase 1 groundwater monitoring well locations were sampled for Appendix I volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) and Appendix I metals. In addition to Appendix I VOCs and metals, the
groundwater analysis for background monitoring well MW-1A also included inorganic constituents iron
and manganese. A summary of the detected analytes associated with this Phase of the landfill is included
as Table 4 in Appendix II. The groundwater monitoring wells associated with these areas include
October 2016 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
January 13, 2017 2
background well MW-1A, compliance wells MW-8, MW-9, and MW-10R that monitor the abandoned
leachate pond, and compliance wells MW-12 through MW-20 that monitor down gradient and side
gradient of the unlined MSW landfill Area “E” and the lined MSW landfill identified as Phase 1.
Based on the laboratory analytical reports included in Appendix III, thirteen VOCs and fifteen metals were
detected in MSW Area “E” and Phase 1 groundwater monitoring wells during the October 2016
monitoring event. During the October 2016 monitoring even MW-8 was dry, and therefore not sampled.
3.1.1.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Background monitoring well MW-1A had a detection of Chloroform at a concentration of 6.8 micrograms
per liter (µg/L), which is below the 2L Standard of 70 µg/L. Both Bromoform and Chloroform have
historically been detected in monitoring well MW-1A which are commonly associated with chlorinated
municipal water. Due to MW-1A’s close proximity to Crouse Road, it is likely the detection of Chloroform
in the well is from a leaking nearby municipal water or sewer line.
No VOCs were detected in groundwater monitoring wells MW-9, MW-10R, MW-12, MW-15, and MW-18
during the October 2016 monitoring event.
Monitoring wells MW-13, MW-14, MW-16R, MW-17R, MW-19, and MW-20 contained one or more of the
thirteen VOCs detected. Of the VOCs detected, five compounds were detected above their respective 2L
Standard: 1,1-Dichloroethane, Benzene, Methylene Chloride, Tetrachloroethene, and Vinyl Chloride.
Please note that groundwater monitoring well MW-14 had no VOC detections above its respective 2L
Standards.
The analytical results for groundwater monitoring well MW-13 indicated that 1,1-Dichloroethane,
Benzene, Tetrachloroethane, and Vinyl Chloride were detected above their respective 2L Standards. The
results of which are as follows:
♦1,1-Dichloroethane detected at 11 µg/L. 2L Standard is 6 µg/L.
♦Benzene detected at 4.6 µg/L. 2L Standard is 1 µg/L.
♦Tetrachloroethane detected at 2.7 µg/L. 2L Standard is 0.7 µg/L.
♦Vinyl Chloride detected at 0.72 J µg/L. 2L Standard is 0.3 µg/L.
The results for groundwater monitoring well MW-16R indicated that Benzene and Vinyl Chloride were
detected above their respective 2L Standard. The results of which are as follows:
♦Benzene detected at 5.7 µg/L. 2L Standard is 1 µg/L.
♦Vinyl chloride detected at 2.8 µg/L. 2L Standard is 0.03 µg/L.
The results for groundwater monitoring well MW-17R indicated that Benzene and Methylene Chloride
were detected above their respective 2L Standard. The results of which are as follows:
♦Benzene detected at 4.6 µg/L. 2L Standard is 1 µg/L.
♦Methylene Chloride at 33 µg/L. 2L Standard is 5 µg/L.
The results for groundwater monitoring well MW-19 indicated that 1,1-Dichloroethane, Benzene, and
Tetrachloroethene were detected above their respective 2L Standard. The results are as follows:
♦1,1-Dichloroethane detected at 12 µg/L. 2L Standard is 6 µg/L.
♦Benzene detected at 1.8 µg/L. 2L Standard is 1 µg/L.
♦Tetrachloroethene detected at 2.4 µg/L. 2L Standard is 0.7 µg/L.
October 2016 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
January 13, 2017 3
The results for groundwater monitoring well MW-20 indicated that 1,1-Dichloroethane, Benzene, and
Vinyl Chloride were detected above their respective 2L Standard. The results are as follows:
♦1,1-Dichloroethane detected at 7.2 µg/L. 2L Standard is 6 µg/L.
♦Benzene detected at 1.4 µg/L. 2L Standard is 1 µg/L.
♦Vinyl Chloride detected at 0.47 J µg/L. 2L Standard is 0.03 µg/L.
Groundwater monitoring wells MW-13, MW-14, MW-16R, MW-17R, MW-19 and MW-20 monitor down
gradient and side gradient of the of the unlined Area “E” landfill, and the volatile organic constituents
detected in these wells are associated with the unlined landfill section.
3.1.1.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals)
The groundwater monitoring wells associated with the MSW Area “E” and Phase 1 landfills had two or
more Appendix I metals detected. Five constituents were detected above their respective 2L Standard or
SW GWP Standard: Antimony, Arsenic, Cobalt, Thallium, and Vanadium.
♦Antimony was detected above its SW GWP Standard of 1 µg/L in background groundwater
monitoring well MW-1A at a concentration of 1.42 J µg/L, and in compliance monitoring well
MW-14 at a concentration of 6.45 µg/L.
♦Arsenic was detected above its 2L Standard of 10 µg/L in compliance monitoring well MW-13 at a
concentration of 19.2 µg/L, and in compliance monitoring well MW-16R at a concentration of 19.9
µg/L.
♦Cobalt was detected above its SW GWP Standard of 70 µg/L in compliance monitoring wells MW-
10R, MW-12, MW-13, MW-14, MW-16R, MW-17R, MW-18, and MW-19 at concentrations ranging
from 1.68 µg/L to 266 µg/L.
♦Thallium was detected above its SW GWP Standard of 0.28 µg/L in compliance monitoring wells
MW-13, MW-16R, and MW-17R at concentrations ranging from 0.435 J to 1.64 J µg/L.
♦Vanadium was detected above its SW GWP Standard of 0.3 µg/L in compliance groundwater
monitoring well MW-10R at a concentration of 13.9 J µg/L.
Total metal concentrations in groundwater sampled from wells are often dependent on the turbidity or
suspended particulates (from the aquifer formation) retrieved with the groundwater sample. The turbidity
is a function of the sampling method, well construction, how the well was developed, and the grain
size/consolidation of the lithologic unit sampled. Since the unfiltered samples are acidified in the field at
the time of collection, metals contained within the particulates are dissolved into the sample. Thus, the
presence of turbidity in groundwater samples often results in elevated (false positive) analytical results for
total metal concentrations. Therefore, the presence of elevated total metal concentrations does not
necessarily correlate with groundwater impact.
Based on historical water quality data, the background well and each of the compliance groundwater
monitoring wells have contained at least one total metal at concentrations above the 2L Standards. Metal
concentrations in several wells have fluctuated below and above detection limits. In background well MW-
1A, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, iron, lead, silver, and vanadium have been detected at
concentrations above the 2L Standards. Based on this data, it appears that the majority of the metals
detected within the monitoring wells are either naturally occurring or a product of turbidity during
sampling.
October 2016 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
January 13, 2017 4
An Alternate Source Demonstration (ASD) for certain metals in groundwater was prepared for the lined
portions of this facility. The ASD concluded that Antimony, Arsenic, Chromium, Cobalt, Lead, and
Vanadium concentrations observed in the vicinity of the lined portion of the landfill were probable
naturally occurring groundwater concentrations. In accordance with 15A NCAC 02L, “where naturally
occurring substances exceed the established standard, the standard shall be the naturally occurring
concentrations as determined by the Director (NCDEQ).” NCDEQ review and approval of the ASD
prepared for this facility remains pending. If approved, most if not all of the total metal constituents
concentrations detected could be deemed compliant with the 2L Standards.
3.1.2 MSW Phase 2
MSW Phase 2 groundwater monitoring well locations were sampled for Appendix I VOCs and Appendix I
metals. A summary of the detected analytes associated with this Phase of the landfill is included as Table
5 in Appendix II. The groundwater monitoring wells associated with this Phase are compliance wells MW-
21 and MW-24 that monitor side gradient of the landfill and MW-25 and MW-25A that monitor the Phase
2 sump.
3.1.2.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
No VOCs were detected above their respective 2L Standard or SW GWP Standard in the MSW Phase 2
monitoring wells during the October 2016 monitoring event. 1,1-Dichloroethane was detected in MW-
25A at a concentration of 0.42 J µg/L which is below the 2L Standard of 6 µg/L.
3.1.2.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals)
The groundwater monitoring wells associated with the Phase 2 landfill had four or more Appendix I
metals detections, two of which were detected above its respective SW GWP Standard. Cobalt was
detected above the SW GWP Standard of 1 µg/L in groundwater monitoring wells MW-25A at a
concentration of 3.56 J µg/L. Vanadium was detected above the SW GWP Standard of 0.3 µg/L in
groundwater monitoring wells MW-25A at a concentration of 1.63 J µg/L.
As previously discussed above, it appears that the majority of the metals detected within the groundwater
monitoring wells are either naturally occurring or a product of turbidity during sampling.
3.1.3 MSW Phase 3
MSW Phase 3 groundwater monitoring well locations were sampled for Appendix I VOCs and Appendix I
metals. A summary of the detected analytes associated with this phase of the landfill is included in Table
6 in Appendix II. The groundwater monitoring wells associated with this area include compliance wells
MW-32R and MW-34 that monitor down gradient and side gradient of the landfill and MW-33/33A and
MW-35/35A that monitor the Phase 3 sump locations.
3.1.3.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
No VOCs were detected in the MSW Phase 3 monitoring wells during the October 2016 monitoring event.
October 2016 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
January 13, 2017 5
3.1.3.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals)
The groundwater monitoring wells associated with the Phase 3 landfill had two or more Appendix I metals
detected, two of which were detected above their respective 2L Standard or SW GWP Standard. The
detections above standards are as follows:
♦Antimony was detected above the SW GWP Standard of 1 µg/L in groundwater monitoring well
MW-33A at a concentration of 4.05 J µg/L.
♦Vanadium was detected above the SW GWP Standard of 0.3 µg/L in groundwater monitoring well
MW-35A at a concentration of 2.15 J µg/L.
As previously discussed above, it appears that the majority of the metals detected within the groundwater
monitoring wells are either naturally occurring or a product of turbidity during sampling.
3.1.4 C&D Landfill Phase 1 and 2
C&D Landfill Phase 1 and Phase 2 groundwater monitoring well locations were sampled for Appendix I
VOCs; Appendix I metals plus mercury, manganese, and iron; and four classical chemistry compounds:
Chloride, Total Dissolved Solids, Sulfate, and Alkalinity. A summary of the detected analytes associated
with the C&D Landfills is included as Table 7 and 8 in Appendix II. The groundwater monitoring wells
associated with the C&D landfill include compliance wells MW-26, MW-27, and MW-28 that monitor
Phase 1 and MW-29, MW-30, MW-31, and MW-36 that monitor Phase 2. Groundwater monitoring well
MW-36 was installed near the C&D compliance boundary as part of the 2013 C&D Assessment. During
the October 2016 monitoring event, field personnel indicated MW-34 had been completely removed
during the construction of the new phase and therefore could not be sampled.
3.1.4.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
C&D Landfill groundwater monitoring wells had seven VOCs detected during the October 2016
monitoring event, two (2) of which were detected above their respective 2L Standard.
♦Tetrachloroethene was detected in groundwater monitoring well MW-28 at a concentration of 7.4
µg/L, which is above its 2L Standard of 0.7 µg/L.
♦Vinyl Chloride was detected in groundwater monitoring well MW-28 at a concentration of 0.89 J
µg/L, which is above its 2L Standard of 0.03 µg/L.
3.1.4.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals)
The groundwater monitoring wells associated with the C&D landfill had four or more metals detections,
and three (3) constituents were detected above their respective 2L Standard and/or SW GWP Standard.
The detections above standards are as follows:
♦Chromium was detected in groundwater monitoring well MW-36 at a concentration of 50.3 µg/L,
which is above the 2L Standard of 10 µg/L.
♦Cobalt was detected in groundwater monitoring well MW-27 at a concentration of 10.0 µg/L and
at monitoring well MW-28 at a concentration of 2.46 J, which are above the SW GWS Standard of
1 µg/L.
♦Iron was detected in groundwater monitoring wells MW-27, MW-29, MW-31, and MW-36 at
concentrations ranging from 525 to 24,800 µg/L, which are above the 2L Standard of 300 µg/L.
October 2016 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
January 13, 2017 6
♦Manganese was detected in groundwater monitoring wells MW-27 and MW-29 at concentrations
of 1,430 µg/L and 152 µg/L, respectively, which are above the 2L Standard of 50 µg/L.
As previously discussed above, it appears that the majority of the metals detected within the groundwater
monitoring wells are either naturally occurring or a product of turbidity during sampling. Since October
2007, Iron and Manganese have been included in the analysis for the C&D wells, and since April 2008, Iron
and Manganese were included in the analysis for the background well MW-1A. Iron and Manganese have
been detected in MW-1A in each monitoring event that has included their analysis.
3.1.4.3 Classical Chemistry Compounds
Total Dissolved Solids, Chloride, Sulfate, and Alkalinity were analyzed for in the C&D landfill groundwater
monitoring wells. The results of the analyses are summarized in Tables 7 and 8 in Appendix II. Please
note that none of the classical chemistry compounds analyzed for exceeded any of the established 2L
Standards and/or SW GWP Standards.
3.2 Surface Water Sampling
Lincoln County Landfill has five surface water sampling locations positioned in the tributaries located to
the east, south, and west of the landfill as indicated on the attached Drawing 1 of 1 in Appendix I. The
original five surface water samples are analyzed for Appendix I VOCs and Appendix I metals plus Mercury,
Iron and Manganese. Beginning with the April 2010 sampling event, a sixth surface water sample location
was added to the semi-annual monitoring plan, SW-6. The addition of SW-6 to the monitoring plan was
in response to the January 2009 leachate release at the facility. SW-6 is located at the discharge of the
lowland area downgradient from the leachate holding tanks as indicated on Drawing 1 of 1. During the
October 2016 sampling event, surface water locations SW-3, SW-5, and SW-6 were not sampled due to
the tributaries being dry or having no flow in those areas at the time of the sampling event. A summary
of the detected analytes associated with the surface water samples collected is included as Table 9 in
Appendix II.
3.2.1 Surface Water Locations SW-1 through SW-5
Surface water sampling location SW-1 had a detection of one VOC, Chloroform, commonly associated
with chlorinated municipal water. Surface water sampling location SW-2 also had a detection of one VOC,
Acetone. Neither VOC has an established 2B Standard.
Surface water sampling location SW-4 had no volatile organic compounds detected during the October
2016 monitoring event.
Three or more metals were detected in surface water sampling locations SW-1, SW-2, and SW-4, none of
which were detected at concentrations above their respective 2B Standard.
3.2.2 Surface Water Location SW-6
Surface water from SW-6 could not be sampled due to the tributary being dry at this location during the
October 2016 sampling event.
October 2016 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
January 13, 2017 7
3.3 Leachate Sampling
A sample of the leachate from the leachate collection system for the landfill was collected from the lift
station prior to leachate entering the on-site leachate holding tanks. The leachate sample was analyzed
for Appendix I VOCs, Appendix I metals, BOD, COD, Nitrate/Nitrite, Sulfate, TSS, and Phosphorous. A
summary of the detected analytes for the leachate is included as Table 10 in Appendix II.
4.0 Statistical Analysis
S&ME compared the water quality data with the 2L Standards and the SW GWP standards and performed
a statistical evaluation of the data. S&ME utilized three (3) statistical methods to evaluate statistically
significant increases between the compliance monitoring wells and the background monitoring well (MW-
1A).
The first method utilized was a one-way parametric Analysis of Variance (Parametric ANOVA). The
parametric ANOVA analysis is recommended by the 1992 guidance document for parameters with fewer
than 15% non-detects in a specific well.
The second method used was the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric rank method. The Kruskal-Wallis
method is recommended by the 1992 guidance document for parameters that have 15% to 90% non-
detects in a specific well.
The third method used was an inter-well non-parametric prediction limit. The prediction limit was used for
parameters with greater than 90% non-detects in a specific well. The 1992 guidance document
recommends this method when a significant portion of the samples are non-detect.
Tables 11 through 13 in Appendix II summarize the results of the statistical analysis. Copies of the
analytical procedures used to perform the analysis used by the ChemStat software are included in
Appendix IV.
4.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
One (1) or more volatile organic compounds were found to have a statistical increase over background
concentrations in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13, MW-14, MW-16(16R), MW-17(17R), MW-19, and
MW-20 that are located downgradient from the unlined closed landfill Area “E”. The statistical increases
are as follows:
♦1,1-Dichloroethane in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13, MW-14, MW-16(16R), MW-19 and
MW-20. It should be noted that concentrations of 1,1-Dichloroethene in MW-13 and MW-16
have decreased over time, whereas the concentrations at MW-19 were rising.
♦1,4-Dichlorobenzene in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13 and MW-16(16R). The
concentrations at MW-13 were generally stable, whereas the concentrations at MW-16 were
rising.
♦Benzene in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13 and MW-16(16R). Reported concentrations
over time have been generally stable.
♦cis-1,2-Dichloroethene in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13, MW-16(16R), MW-19 and MW-
20. Concentrations at these wells have been relatively stable, although a rising trend over time is
noted at MW-16.
♦Chlorobenzene in groundwater monitoring well MW-16(16R).
October 2016 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
January 13, 2017 8
♦Chloroethane in groundwater monitoring well MW-13. It should be noted that concentrations of
Chloroethane in well MW-13 have decreased over time.
♦Methylene Chloride in groundwater monitoring wells MW-17(17R), MW-19 and MW-20. It should
be noted that concentrations of Methylene Chloride in wells MW-19 and MW-20 have decreased
over time.
♦Tetrachloroethene in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13 and MW-19. Reported
concentrations over time have been generally stable.
♦Toluene in groundwater monitoring well MW-13.
♦Trichloroethene in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13 and MW-19. Reported concentrations
over time have been generally stable.
♦Vinyl Chloride in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13 and MW-16(16R). Reported
concentrations over time have been generally stable.
♦Total Xylenes in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13 and MW-17(17R). Reported
concentrations over time have been generally stable.
There were no volatile organic compounds with statistically significant increases over background for
the Phase 2 and Phase 3 MSW wells. Graphs depicting concentrations over time for constituents with
a statistical increase are provided in Appendix V.
4.2 Total Metals
Total metal concentrations in groundwater sampled from wells are often dependent on the turbidity or
suspended particulates (from the aquifer formation) retrieved with the groundwater sample. The turbidity
is a function of the sampling method, well construction, how the well was developed, and the grain
size/consolidation of the lithologic unit sampled. Since the unfiltered samples are acidified in the field at
the time of sample collection, metals contained within the particulates are dissolved into the water
sample. Thus, the presence of turbidity in groundwater samples often results in elevated (false positive)
analytical results for total metal concentrations. Therefore, the presence of elevated total metal
concentrations does not necessarily correlate with groundwater impact.
Based on the historical water quality data, the background well and each of the compliance groundwater
monitoring wells (excluding MW-19, 22, 24 and 25) have contained at least one (1) total metal at
concentrations above the 2L Standards. The statistical evaluation indicates that eight (8) of the
compliance groundwater monitoring wells (MW-8, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, and 33A) contained at least one (1)
metal at a statistically significant level higher than the background well. Metal concentrations in several
wells have fluctuated between non-detect and detect. In the background well, MW-1A, antimony,
beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, iron, lead, silver, and vanadium have been detected at
concentrations above the 2L Standards. Graphs depicting concentrations over time for constituents with a
statistical increase are provided in Appendix V.
5.0 Methane Readings
Methane Readings are collected from eleven (11) locations on site, including eight (8) methane
monitoring wells (MMW-1 through MMW-8) and the scale house, landfill shop, and lift station on site.
Methane readings are measured monthly by Lincoln County personnel using a GEM 2000 gas meter. April
2016 through October 2016 methane readings and a figure showing their locations are located in
Appendix VI.
Appendices
Appendix I – Drawings
G
G
G
G
G
G
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
MW-8
MW-26
C&D PHASE II
C&D PHASE I
EXISTING AREA "E"CLOSED LANDFILLEXISTING AREA "D"PHASE IPHASE II
PHASE III
MW-9(804.76)
MW-30(832.25)
MW-18(834.09)
MW-36(824.44)
MW-35(804.93)
MW-34
MW-33(803.05)
MW-31(847.40)
MW-29(836.88)
MW-28(870.56)
MW-27(861.61)
MW-25(808.34)
MW-24(813.42)
MW-21(815.55)MW-20(843.61)
MW-1A(889.02)
MW-15(819.60)
MW-14(840.24)MW-13(839.81)
MW-12(813.55)
MW-32R(809.22)
MW-25A(808.01)MW-17R(857.35)
MW-16R(859.79)
MW-10R(805.33)
MW-19(832.03)
825
8
3
0
820
8
3
5
8
4
0
815
8
4
5
8 1 0
8
5
0
8 5 5
8
6
0
8 0 5
8 6 5 8 7 0
8 7 5
8 8 0
8 8 5
SW-4
SW-5
SW-1
SW-2
SW-3
SW-6
856
86 4
8 5 2
8 4 8
8 4 4
8 3 6
8
3
2
828
824
868
872
87 6
816
884
888
812
892808
804
796
8 9 6
904
9 0 8
912 916
9 2 4
792
788
784
9 2 8
932
9
3
6
864
924
924
904
9 1 6
892
884
7 8 4
936
928
796
8 1 2
9 1 2
824
9
3
6
8
7
6
9 1 2
936
844
868
8 9 2
912
808
7 8 8
9 2 8
848
8
8
8
932
8
6
8
904
856
932
8 8 8
856
892
8
6
8
9 0 8
8 9 6
9 0 4
784
8 7 2
872
848
8 5 2
9 0 8
90
8
9 2 4
876
8 8 4
912
8 1 2
892
9 1 6
836
924
9 3 2
S H O A L R D
C R O U S E R D
Y
O
D
E
R R
D
SHIRLEY REYNOLDS LN
0 500 1,000Feet
LEGEND
<GROUNDWATER MONITOR WELLS
G SURFACE WATER SAMPLE
GROUNDWATER CONTOURS - 5 FT INTERVAL
C&D LANDFILL BOUNDARY
MSW BOUNDARY
STREAMS
4' CONTOURS
ROADS
DIRT ROADS
SITE
´
1
G R O U N D W A T E R C O N T O U R M A P
O C T O B E R 2 0 1 6
L I N C O L N C O U N T Y L A N D F I L L
C R O U S E , N O R T H C A R O L I N A
1 3 5 6 -0 7 -0 0 4
1 " = 5 0 0 '
J A N 2 0 1 7
FIGURE NO.
S C A L E :
P R O J E C T N O :
D A T E :
D R A W N B Y :
C H E C K E D B Y :
N C E N G . L I C E N S E #F -0 1 7 6
3 2 0 1 S P R I N G F O R E S T R D , R A L E I G H , N C 2 7 6 1 6
W W W .S M E I N C .C O M
D R A W I N G N U M B E R :
B T R
B -2 6 8 0
Appendix II –Tables
Latitude Longitude Ground TOC DTW - TOC GW ELEV.
(MM/DD/YY)(ft)(ft-MSL)
MW-1A Background - - -35.4305188° -081.3550147° - - -929.27 - - - to - - -- - - to - - -- - - to - - -- - - to - - -- - - to - - -- - -40.25 889.02
MW-8 Leachate Lagoon - - -35.4204767°-081.3543964°- - -840.03 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -DRY N/A
MW-9 Leachate Lagoon - - -35.4205014°-081.3544769°- - -840.20 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -35.44 804.76
MW-10R Leachate Lagoon - - -35.4209399°-081.3538215°- - -834.97 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -29.64 805.33
MW-12 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4229138°-081.3543339°- - -827.57 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -14.02 813.55
MW-13 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4252197°-081.3569120°- - -872.78 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -32.97 839.81
MW-14 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4252431°-081.3570085°- - -871.44 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -31.20 840.24
MW-15 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4232655°-081.3580245°- - -847.86 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -28.26 819.60
MW-16R Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4270857°-081.3570696°- - -876.39 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -16.60 859.79
MW-17R Area "E" and Phase 1 07/20/93 35.4262555°-081.3548668°898.14 899.64 0.0 to 20.0 20.0 to 35.0 0.0 to 16.0 16.0 to 18.0 18.0 to 45.5 - - -42.29 857.35
MW-18 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4246249°-081.3576782°859.20 861.41 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -15.2 to 30.2 - - -27.32 834.09
MW-19 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4247561°-081.3576590°859.95 859.73 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -63.0 to 68.0 - - -27.70 832.03
MW-20 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4256922°-081.3575990°- - -860.00 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -10.1 to 25.1 - - -16.39 843.61
MW-21 Phase 2 09/03/99 35.4221305°-081.3579143°853.80 855.91 0.0 to 27.0 27.0 to 42.0 0.0 to 23.0 23.0 to 25.0 25.0 to 42.0 SAP 40.36 815.55
MW-24 Phase 2 09/02/99 35.4219922°-081.3540276°838.95 841.13 0.0 to 14.0 14.0 to 29.0 0.0 to 10.0 10.0 to 12.0 12.0 to 29.0 SAP 27.71 813.42
MW-25 Phase 2 08/31/99 35.4213534°-081.3546541°836.75 838.73 0.0 to 15.0 15.0 to 30.0 0.0 to 11.0 11.0 to 13.0 13.0 to 30.0 SAP 30.39 808.34
MW-25A Phase 2 09/01/99 35.4212848°-081.3547068°836.75 838.84 0.0 to 50.0 50.0 to 60.0 0.0 to 46.0 46.0 to 48.0 48.0 to 60.0 SAP 30.83 808.01
MW-26 C&D Phase 1 09/08/99 35.4273089°-081.3527074°869.11 871.19 0.0 to 6.0 6.0 to 21.0 0.0 to 4.0 4.0 to 5.0 5.0 to 21.0 SAP 15.10 N/A
MW-27 C&D Phase 1 09/07/99 35.4278831°-081.3533157°879.03 880.90 0.0 to 10.0 10.0 to 25.0 0.0 to 6.0 6.0 to 8.0 8.0 to 25.0 SAP 19.29 861.61
MW-28 C&D Phase 1 04/01/99 35.4276977°-081.3542728°912.72 915.68 0.0 to 36.0 36.0 to 51.0 0.0 to 32.0 32.0 to 34.0 34.0 to 51.0 SAP 45.12 870.56
MW-29 C&D Phase 2 04/30/02 35.4252895°-081.3534741°877.45 879.97 0.0 to 30.0 30.0 to 45.0 0.0 to 26.0 26.0 to 28.0 28.0 to 45.0 PWR 43.09 836.88
MW-30 C&D Phase 2 05/02/02 35.4259842°-081.3520549°883.72 886.35 0.0 to 45.0 45.0 to 60.0 0.0 to 41.0 41.0 to 43.0 43.0 to 60.0 SAP 54.10 832.25
MW-31 C&D Phase 2 06/19/03 35.4266563°-081.3521999°877.40 879.88 0.0 to 25.0 25.0 to 40.0 0.0 to 21.0 21.0 to 23.0 23.0 to 40.0 PWR 32.48 847.40
MW-32R Phase 3 12/20/04 35.4214589°-081.3583317°825.89 827.25 0.0 to 10.0 10.0 to 25.0 0.0 to 6.0 6.0 to 8.0 8.0 to 25.0 SAP 18.03 809.22
MW-33 Phase 3 12/30/04 35.4208632°-081.3585631°816.33 819.38 0.0 to 7.0 7.0 to 22.0 0.0 to 3.0 3.0 to 5.0 5.0 to 22.0 SAP 16.33 803.05
MW-33A Phase 3 12/30/04 35.4208632°-081.3585631°815.94 818.67 0.0 to 56.5 56.5 to 61.5 0.0 to 52.5 52.5 to 54.5 54.5 to 61.5 ROCK 16.30 802.37
MW-34 Phase 3 12/21/04 35.4202637°-081.3569455°829.82 832.77 0.0 to 17.0 17.0 to 32.0 0.0 to 13.0 13.0 to 15.0 15.0 to 32.0 SAP NM N/A
MW-35 Phase 3 12/28/04 35.4200537°-081.3551088°836.85 839.64 0.0 to 19.0 19.0 to 34.0 0.0 to 15.0 15.0 to 17.0 17.0 to 34.0 SAP 34.71 804.93
MW-35A Phase 3 12/28/04 35.4200537°-081.3551088°836.77 839.83 0.0 to 60.0 60.0 to 65.0 0.0 to 56.0 56.0 to 58.0 58.0 to 65.0 SAP 35.68 804.15
MW-36 C&D Phase 2 06/26/13 35.4252949° -081.3518019° 852.00 854.83 0.0 to 19.5 19.5 to 34.5 0.0 to 9.5 9.5 to 17.7 17.7 to 35.0 SAP 30.39 824.44
Notes:
(ft-MSL)Feet Mean Sea Level DTW Depth to Water Sch. 40 Schedule 40 Pipe PWR Partially Weathered Rock
(ft-bls)Feet Below Land Surface GW ELEV.Groundwater Elevation 0.010 Slot 0.010-Inch Machine-Slotted Pipe ROCK Bedrock
TOC Top of Casing #2 Filter Sand Medium to Fine Grained Silica Sand Neat CementCement Mixture without Bentonite - - -Not Available
Ground Ground Surface Bentonite Bentonite Pellets SAP Saprolite
DRY No water in well at time of sampling
NS Well was not sampled
N/A Not Applicable
2-inch, SCH. 40, PVC 2-inch, 0.010 Slot, PVC Neatr Cement Bentonite Interval
(decimal degrees)(ft-MSL)(ft-bls)(ft-bls)(ft-bls)
Screen Interval Grout Interval Seal Interval Filter Pack Geology in
Screen
Interval
October 2016
(ft-bls)(ft-bls)
Table 1
Well Construction Summary and Water Level Data
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No: 1356-07-004
Well ID Area Monitored
Install Date
GPS Coordinates Survey Elevations Casing Interval
K n I v
Well Hydraulic Cond. Eff. Porosity Gradient Flow Velocity
ID (ft/day)(ne)(ft/ft)(ft/yr)
MW-1A - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-8 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-10R - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-12 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-13 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-15 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-16R - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-17R 1.4E+00 17%0.02 67
MW-18 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-20 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-21 4.5E-01 23%0.01 8
MW-24 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-25 1.0E-01 24%0.01 2
MW-26 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-27 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-28 3.2E-01 - - -- - -- - -
MW-29 8.6E-01 3%0.04 406
MW-30 5.0E+00 24%0.07 521
MW-31 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-32R 2.6E-01 20%0.03 12
MW-33 3.0E+00 27%0.03 134
MW-34 7.5E+00 21%- - -- - -
MW-35 4.9E-01 16%0.01 8
MW-36 3.5E+00 20%0.06 353
Notes:
(4) Seepage velocity v = (K*i)/ne
- - -Not Available
(1) Hydraulic Conductivity was calculated from slug tests performed after well
construction.
October 2016
(3) Hydraulic gradient calculated by measuring linear feet between selected contour
intervals.
Table 2
Groundwater Flow Data
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No: 1356-07-004
(2) Effective porosity was estimated from soils collected within the saturated portion of
screen interval during well construction.
Well ID
DTW TOC
(ft-bls)pH Temp (°C)
Conductance
(μS)
Turbidity
(NTU)
MW-1A 40.25 5.16 17.6 19 9.81
MW-8
MW-9 35.44 6.47 16.4 45 1.32
MW-10R 29.64 6.26 17.5 132 117.50
MW-12 14.02 5.46 18.3 139 28.45
MW-13 32.97 5.90 19.4 300 17.30
MW-14 31.20 5.60 18.3 148 1.86
MW-15 28.26 6.30 17.1 60 8.54
MW-16R 16.60 6.40 20.7 841 29.13
MW-17R 42.29 5.04 18.5 73 14.16
MW-18 27.32 6.13 15.3 223 51.83
MW-19 27.70 6.40 16.5 132 3.91
MW-20 16.39 5.60 19.7 148 0.78
MW-21 40.36 5.31 16.1 86 23.97
MW-24 27.71 5.15 18.2 245 2.20
MW-25 30.39 5.80 18.9 146 37.12
MW-25A 30.83 6.10 19.1 117 6.86
MW-26 15.10 6.00 21.7 95 0.38
MW-27 19.29 5.00 18.0 362 7.53
MW-28 45.12 4.90 17.7 49 5.02
MW-29 43.09 5.36 18.1 245 4.68
MW-30 54.10 6.10 19.1 71 12.90
MW-31 32.48 5.55 16.7 59 65.82
MW-32R 18.03 7.00 20.7 81 14.35
MW-33 16.33 6.40 19.9 101 1.21
MW-33A 16.30 6.60 19.5 239 1.71
MW-34
MW-35 34.71 6.20 17.6 23 12.04
MW-35A 35.68 6.20 17.5 23 12.04
MW-36 30.39 5.35 15.6 22 6.38
Notes:
°C degrees Celsius
μS micro siemems
NTU nephelometric turbidity unit
Table 3
October 2016 - Field Parameters in Monitoring Wells
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
DRY
Not Located
EPA Appendix I Volatile
Organic Compounds Method
8260 (µg/L)
NCDEQ
SWSL
15A
NCAC
2L
Soild
Waste
GWP ST
MW-1A MW-8 MW-9 MW-10R MW-12 MW-13 MW-14 MW-15 MW-16R MW-17R MW-18 MW-19 MW-20
1,1-Dichloroethane 5 6 NE 11 2.4 J 1.0 J 5.1 12 7.2
1,4 - Dichlorobenzene 1 6 NE 2.7 3.9 2.6 1.5
cis-1,2,-Dichloroethene 5 70 NE 2.4 J 8.0 2.7 J 1.1 J 3.6 J
Benzene 1 1 NE 4.6 5.7 4.6 1.8 1.4
Chlorobenzene 3 50 NE 4.5
Chloroform 5 70 NE 6.8
Ethyl Chloride (Chloroethane)10 3000 NE 0.81 J 0.53 J
Methylene Chloride 1 5 NE 33 2.8 0.91 J
Tetrachloroethene 1 0.7 NE 2.7 0.54 J 2.4 0.55 J
Trichloroethene 1 3 NE 2.0 1.1 1.8 0.70 J
Trichlorofluoromethane 1 2000 NE 0.45 J
Vinyl chloride 1 0.03 NE 0.72 J 2.8 0.47 J
Xylenes (total)5 500 NE 2.0 J 12 1.6 J 1.7EPA Appendix I Metals
Method 6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Antimony 6 NE 1 1.42 J 6.45 0.849 J
Arsenic 10 10 NE 19.2 19.9
Barium 100 700 NE 24.6 J 27.5 J 82.4 J 141 94.6 J 26.9 J 79.1 J 539 129 60.0 J 30.8 J 93.2 J
Beryllium 1 NE 4 0.310 J 0.172 J 0.245 J
Chromium 10 10 NE 1.52 J 2.69 J 7.58 J
Cobalt 10 NE 1 2.35 J 17.5 266 1.49 J 33.8 18.4 1.68 J 5.66 J
Copper 10 1000 NE 1.83 J 2.76 J 4.87 J 4.74 J 4.17 J 7.06 J 3.93 J 1.74 J
Iron 300 300 NE 26.6 J
Lead 10 15 NE 5.01 J
Manganese 50 50 NE 8.50 J
Nickel 50 100 NE 5.03 J 3.39 J 14.1 J 2.73 J 11.1 J 8.28 J 2.46 J
Silver 10 20 NE 6.39 J
Thallium 5.5 NE 0.28 0.128 J 0.151 J 0.714 J 0.119 J 1.64 J 0.435 J 0.220 J
Vanadium 25 NE 0.3 13.9 J
Zinc 10 1000 NE 7.70 J 27.0 16.4 5.40 J 15.5
Table 4
October 2016 - Detected Analytes in Monitoring Wells for MSW Area “E” and Phase 1
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
DRY
DRY
EPA Appendix I Volatile
Organic Compounds Method
8260 (µg/L)
NCDEQ
SWSL
15A
NCAC
2L
Soild
Waste
GWP ST
MW-21 MW-24 MW-25 MW-25A
1,1-Dichloroethane 5 6 NE 0.42 J
EPA Appendix I Metals
Method 6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Antimony 6 NE 1 0.708 J
Barium 100 700 NE 55.7 J 241 270 144
Beryllium 1 NE 4 0.111 J 1.05 0.296 J
Cadmium 1 2 NE 0.393 J
Chromium 10 10 NE 1.98 J 4.70 J
Cobalt 10 NE 1 3.56 J
Copper 10 1000 NE 2.12 J 1.91 J 2.10 J 1.73 J
Nickel 50 100 NE 5.69 J
Thallium 5.5 NE 0.28 0.191 J 0.151 J
Vanadium 25 NE 0.3 1.63 J
Zinc 10 1000 NE 15.8 29.1 26.5 8.72 J
Table 5
October 2016 - Detected Analytes in Monitoring Wells for MSW Phase 2
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
EPA Appendix I Volatile
Organic Compounds Method
8260 (µg/L)
NCDEQ
SWSL
15A
NCAC
2L
Soild
Waste
GWP ST
MW-32R MW-33 MW-33A MW-34 MW-35 MW-35A
EPA Appendix I Metals
Method 6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Antimony 6 NE 1 4.05 J 0.545 J
Barium 100 700 NE 15.6 J 42.1 J 4.76 J 47.4 J 45.6 J
Beryllium 1 NE 4 0.155 J
Cadmium 1 2 NE 0.387 J
Chromium 10 10 NE 3.20 J
Copper 10 1000 NE 1.82 J 5.14 J 1.85 J
Vanadium 25 NE 0.3 2.15 J
Zinc 10 1000 NE 35.0 17.4 7.15 J
No Volatile Organic Compounds Detected in Phase 3 During October 2016 Sampling
Table 6
October 2016 - Detected Analytes in Monitoring Wells for MSW Phase 3
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
EPA Appendix I Volatile
Organic Compounds Method
8260 (µg/L)
NCDEQ
SWSL
15A NCAC
2L
Soild
Waste
GWP ST
MW-26 MW-27 MW-28
1,1-Dichloroethane 5 6 NE 0.64 J
Benzene 1 1 NE 0.51 J
Tetrachloroethene 1 0.7 NE 0.45 J 7.4
Tetrahydrofuran NE NE NE 5.8
Trichloroethene 1 3 NE 0.47 JVinyl Chloride 1 0.03 NE 0.89 J
EPA Appendix I Metals
Method 6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Barium 100 700 NE 86.2 J 160 104
Beryllium 1 NE 4 0.322 J
Chromium 10 10 NE 2.24 J 1.81 J
Cobalt 10 NE 1 10.0 2.46 J
Copper 10 1000 NE 3.93 J 2.91 J
Iron 300 300 NE 32.4 J 534 222 J
Manganese 50 50 NE 2.85 J 1,430 27.6 J
Nickel 50 100 NE 17.0 J 3.95 J
Thallium 5.5 NE 0.28 0.185 0.128 J
Zinc 10 1000 NE 15.9 10.2
Classical Chemistry
Compounds (mg/L)
Chloride NE 250 NE 3.6 J 33
Sulfate as SO4 250 250 NE 3.7 J 50 J
Total Dissolved Solids NE 500 NE 200
Total Alkalinity NE NE NE 30 59
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Lincoln County Landfill
October 2016 - Detected Analytes in Monitoring Wells for C&D Phase 1
Table 7
EPA Appendix I Volatile Organic
Compounds Method 8260 (µg/L)
NCDEQ
SWSL
15A
NCAC
2L
Soild
Waste
GWP ST
MW-29 MW-30 MW-31 MW-36
Benzene 1 1 NE 0.55 J
Methyl Chloride (Chloromethane)1 3 NE 2.4
EPA Appendix I Metals Method
6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Barium 100 700 NE 13.6 J 68.0 J 5.07 J 54.3 J
Beryllium 1 NE 4 0.313 J
Chromium 10 10 NE 50.3
Copper 10 1000 NE 5.56 J 2.59 J
Iron 300 300 NE 24,800 76.7 J 4,300 525
Manganese 50 50 NE 152 23.9 J 29.7 J 14.9 J
Nickel 50 100 NE 24.3 J
Zinc 10 1000 NE 5.90 J 4.43 J
Classical Chemistry Compounds
(mg/L)
Chloride NE 250 NE 4.6 J
Sulfate as SO4 250 250 NE 5.9 J 3.8 J 7.7 J
Total Dissolved Solids NE 500 NE 110
Total Alkalinity NE NE NE 99 21
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Lincoln County Landfill
October 2016 - Detected Analytes in Monitoring Wells for C&D Phase 2
Table 8
EPA Appendix I Volatile
Organic Compounds Method
8260 (µg/L)
15A NCAC
2B SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SW-4 SW-5 SW-6
Acetone NE 11 J dry dry dry
Chloroform NE 0.50 J dry dry dry
EPA Appendix I Metals
Method 6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Barium 1,000 20.0 J 20.9 J dry 24.6 J dry dry
Iron NE 636 190 J dry 429 dry dry
Manganese NE 87.7 16.1 J dry 15.7 dry dry
Zinc 36 15.7 dry dry dry
Classical Chemistry
Compounds (mg/L)
BOD NE NA NA dry NA dry dry
COD NE NA NA dry NA dry dry
Sulfate NE NA NA dry NA dry dry
Sulfate as SO4 NE NA NA dry NA dry dry
Phosphorous NE NA NA dry NA dry dry
Nitrate as N NE NA NA dry NA dry dry
Nitrate/Nitrite as N NE NA NA dry NA dry dry
Total Suspended Solids NE NA NA dry NA dry dry
Total Alkalinity NE NA NA dry NA dry dry
Table 9
October 2016 - Detected Analytes in Surface Water Samples
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
EPA Appendix I Volatile Organic
Compounds Method 8260 (µg/L)
NCDEQ SWSL Lift Station
EPA Appendix I Metals Method
6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Arsenic 10 435
Barium 100 2,030
Chromium 10 67.0
Cobalt 10 23.2
Copper 10 26.5
Lead 10 21.3
Nickel 50 77.3
Silver 10 3.84 J
Thallium 5.5 1.39 JD
Vanadium 25 83
Zinc 10 614
Classical Chemistry Compounds (mg/L)
BOD NE 64
COD NE 620
Sulfate as SO4 250 6600 J
Phosphorous NE 8300 D
Nitrate as N 10 40 J
Nitrite as N 1000 280 J
Nitrate/Nitrite as N NE 320
Total Alkalinity NE 1,700 D
Total Suspended Solids NE 710
Table 10
October 2016 - Detected Analytes in Leachate
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
No Volatile Organic Compounds Detected in October 2016
Notes:
(1) ug/L = micrograms per liter (parts per billion)
(2) mg/L = milligrams per liter (parts per million)
(3) μS = microSiemens
(4) 15A NCAC 2L = North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standards
(5) 15A NCAC 2B = North Carolina Surface Water Quality Standards
(6) GWP ST = Solid Waste Groundwater Protection Standard
(7) NE = No established standard
(8) Bold indicates above 15A NCAC 2L, 15A NCAC 2B, or SWS GWP standard
(9) Compounds not shown were not detected.
(10) SWSL = North Carolina Department of Environmtental Quality, Solid Waste Section Limit established in 2007
(11) NA = Not Analyzed
(12) J = Analyte detected is between the Method Detection Limit (MDL) and the SWSL
(13) B = Analyte was detected in the associated method blank
(14) D = The sample was analyzed at dilution
(15) Dry = surface water sample location dry or no flow, location not sampled
Notes for Tables 4 through 10
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
1,1-Dichloroethane MW-13 2%PA TRUE Concentrations have decreased over time
MW-14 51%KW TRUE
MW-16 26%KW TRUE Concentrations have decreased over time
MW-17 81%KW FALSE
MW-19 33%KW TRUE Concentrations rising over time
MW-20 35%KW TRUE Concentrations inconsistent over time
1,4-Dichlorobenzene MW-13 55%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
MW-16 57%KW TRUE Concentrations rising over time
MW-17 91%PL FALSE
MW-19 93%PL FALSE
MW-20 85%KW FALSE
Antimony MW-14 55%KW FALSE
MW-19 58%KW FALSE
Arsenic MW-13 47%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
MW-16 59%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
Barium MW-12 38%KW FALSE
MW-13 34%KW FALSE
MW-14 45%KW FALSE
MW-16 35%KW TRUE Concentrations rising over time
MW-17 35%KW FALSE
MW-10 23%KW FALSE
MW-15 22%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
MW-8 39%KW FALSE
MW-9 35%KW FALSE
MW-18 33%KW FALSE
MW-19 50%KW FALSE
MW-20 33%KW FALSE
Benzene MW-13 34%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
MW-16 52%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
MW-17 88%KW FALSE
MW-19 65%KW FALSE
MW-20 70%KW FALSE
Beryllium MW-10 58%KW FALSE
MW-17 56%KW FALSE
MW-15 39%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene MW-13 44%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
MW-16 47%KW TRUE Concentrations rising over time
MW-17 91%PL FALSE
MW-19 56%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
MW-20 60%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
Chlorobenzene MW-16 61%KW TRUE
Chromium MW-9 34%KW FALSE
MW-10 33%KW FALSE
Table 11
October 2016 Statistical Analysis for Phase 1 and Area "E"
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Page 1 of 3
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Table 11
October 2016 Statistical Analysis for Phase 1 and Area "E"
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Cobalt MW-12 30%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
MW-13 0%PA TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
MW-14 77%KW FALSE
MW-16 9%PA FALSE
MW-17 40%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
MW-10 63%KW FALSE
MW-8 32%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
MW-9 89%KW FALSE
MW-18 63%KW FALSE
MW-20 63%KW FALSE
Copper MW-13 66%KW FALSE
MW-14 43%KW FALSE
MW-17 63%KW FALSE
MW-9 68%KW FALSE
MW-10 60%KW FALSE
MW-18 55%KW FALSE
MW-20 88%KW FALSE
Ethyl Chloride MW-13 36%KW TRUE Concentrations declining with over time
(Chloroethane)MW-20 83%KW FALSE
Lead MW-16 46%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
Methylene Chloride MW-17 91%PL TRUE First Detection and First SSI in April 2015
MW-19 48%KW TRUE Concentrations have decreased over time
MW-20 48%KW TRUE Concentrations have decreased over time
Nickel MW-10 70%KW FALSE
MW-12 57%KW FALSE
MW-13 47%KW FALSE
MW-14 66%KW FALSE
MW-16 54%KW FALSE
MW-17 47%KW FALSE
MW-18 65%KW FALSE
Silver MW-16 72%KW FALSE
Tetrachloroethene MW-13 49%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
MW-14 83%KW FALSE
MW-17 72%KW FALSE
MW-19 50%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
MW-20 73%KW FALSE
Thallium MW-10 91%PL FALSE
MW-13 45%KW FALSE
MW-14 92%PL FALSE
MW-16 52%KW FALSE
MW-17 88%KW FALSE
MW-18 63%KW FALSE
Page 2 of 3
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Table 11
October 2016 Statistical Analysis for Phase 1 and Area "E"
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Toluene MW-12 98%PL FALSE
MW-13 70%KW FALSE Concentrations vary from non-detect to detect
Trichloroethene MW-13 49%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
MW-14 89%KW FALSE
MW-16 87%KW FALSE
MW-17 84%KW FALSE
MW-19 53%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
MW-20 73%KW FALSE
Trichlorofluoromethane MW-17 95%PL FALSE
Vanadium MW-10 30%KW FALSE
Vinyl Chloride MW-13 62%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
MW-16 28%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
MW-20 85%KW FALSE
Xylenes (Total)MW-13 40%KW TRUE Concentrations generally stable over time
MW-17 91%PL TRUE First Detection and First SSI in April 2015
MW-19 71%KW FALSE
MW-20 85%KW FALSE
Zinc MW-10 28%KW FALSE
MW-14 47%KW FALSE
MW-16 33%KW FALSE
MW-17 37%KW FALSE
Page 3 of 3
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Antimony MW-25A 46%KW FALSE
Barium MW-21 32%KW FALSE
MW-24 38%KW FALSE
MW-25 39%KW FALSE
MW-25A 32%KW FALSE
Beryllium MW-21 51%KW FALSE
MW-24 51%KW FALSE
MW-25 53%KW FALSE
Cadmium MW-25 86%KW FALSE
Chromium MW-25 47%KW FALSE
MW-25A 30%KW FALSE
Cobalt MW-25A 51%KW FALSE
Copper MW-21 73%KW FALSE
MW-24 76%KW FALSE
MW-25 78%KW FALSE
MW-25A 70%KW FALSE
1.1-Dichloroethane MW-25A 97%PL FALSE
Nickel MW-25 67%KW FALSE
Thallium MW-24 73%KW FALSE
MW-25 86%KW FALSE
Vanadium MW-25A 43%KW FALSE
Zinc MW-21 62%KW FALSE
MW-24 43%KW FALSE
MW-25 44%KW FALSE
MW-25A 49%KW FALSE
Table 12
October 2016 Statistical Analysis for Phase 2
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Page 1 of 1
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Antimony MW-33A 31%KW TRUE typically 2 ug/L, but increased to ~4 ug/L in 2016
MW-35A 50%KW FALSE
Barium MW-32 8%PA FALSE
MW-33 8%PA FALSE
MW-33A 23%PA FALSE
MW-35 8%PA FALSE
MW-35A 8%PA FALSE
Beryllium MW-33 42%KW FALSE
Cadmium MW-33A 85%KW FALSE
Chromium MW-35A 27%KW FALSE
Copper MW-32 71%KW FALSE
MW-33A 35%KW FALSE
MW-35 76%KW FALSE
Vanadium MW-35A 223%KW FALSE
Zinc MW-32 29%KW FALSE
MW-33A 23%KW FALSE
MW-35 20%KW FALSE
Table 13
October 2016 Statistical Analysis for Phase 3
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Page 1 of 1
Notes:
(1) SSI = Statistically Significant Increase
(2) PA = One Way Parametric Analysis of Variance (Parametric ANOVA)
The parametric ANOVA analysis is recommended by the 1992 guidance document for parameters
with fewer than 15% non-detects in a specific well.
(3) KW = Kruskal Wallis Non-Parametric Rank Analysis
The Kruskal-Wallis method is recommended by the 1992 guidance document for parameters that
have 15% to 90% non-detects in a specific well.
(4) PL = Non-Parametric Inter-Well Prediction Limit Analysis
The prediction limit was used for parameters with greater than 90% non-detects in a specific well.
The 1992 guidance document recommends this method when a significant portion of the samples
are non-detect.
Notes for Tables 11 through 13
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Appendix III – Well Sampling Logs and Laboratory Reports
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-1A
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 13:27 5.19 18.5 274.30
3.0 13:33 5.19 17.9 51.94
6.0 13:40 5.17 17.5 14.45
Final 9.0 13:47 5.16 17.6 9.81
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Comments
Lab
19
19
19
17.35
3.0
20
Electric Water Level Probe
Field Cleaned Mega Monsoon
Gary Simcox
57.60
TOC
40.25
ENCO
HCL
disposable teflon bailer
Appendix I Metals + Hg,
Mn, Fe HNO3(1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-8
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0
Final
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
32.00
0.00
0.00
Disposable Teflon Bailer
Electric Water Level Probe
Gary Simcox
TOC
32.00
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
Not sampled/well dry
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-9
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 9:55 6.59 16.5 1.15
6 10:02 6.49 16.3 3.38
12 10:10 6.47 16.4 1.92
Final 18 10:18 6.47 16.4 1.30
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 10:45 6.22 17.5 1.32
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
(1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab ENCO
Clear
HCL
HNO3
42
43
44
45
10/19/2016
10:45
disposable teflon bailer
40
UnpreservedDissolved Metals
Electric Water Level Probe
Field Cleaned Mega Monsoon
TOC
35.44
68.00
Gary Simcox
32.56
5.3
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-10R
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 12:15 6.13 17.3
0.3 12:18 6.26 17.5 1014.00
Final
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 11:05 117.50
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
(1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
Gary Simcox
0.3
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
29.64
31.10
135
132
1.46
Disposable Teflon Bailer
10/19/2016
11:05
disposable teflon bailer
Filled metals containers and well was dry, will come back later for VOA's
ENCO
not much water/turbid
HCL
HNO3
Dissolved Metals Unpreserved
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-12
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 11:40 5.53 17.3
1.0 11:44 5.62 16.7
2.0 11:47 5.60 16.5
Final 3.0 11:51 5.55 16.3 28.45
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 11:55 5.46 18.3 28.45
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
(1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab ENCO
Clear
HCL
HNO3
166
161
145
133
10/19/2016
11:55
disposable teflon bailer
This well could be purged with and sampled with a pump.
Dissolved Metals Unpreserved
139
Electric Water Level Probe
Disposable Teflon Bailer
TOC
14.02
20.00
Gary Simcox
5.98
1.0
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-13
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/17/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 5.90 19.1 1.88
1.3 5.80 17.5 10.79
2.6 6.00 17.5 11.02
Final 3.9 6.00 17.2 8.77
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 14:40 5.90 19.4 17.30
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
287
Bob Bryant
Clear
Tag illegible
1.3
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
32.97
40.50
245
258
282
7.53
Disposable Teflon Bailer
10/18/2016
14:40
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
300
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-14
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/17/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 6.90 18.2 2.11
7.8 6.30 18.0 3.88
15,6 6.10 18.0 7.35
Final 23.4 6.30 17.8 0.74
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 14:55 5.60 18.3 1.86
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab ENCO
HCL
HNO3
129
119
118
118
10/18/2016
14:55
disposable teflon bailer
148
Electric Water Level Probe
Field Cleaned Typhoon Pump
TOC
31.20
76.00
Bob Bryant
Clear
Tag illegible
44.80
7.8
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-15
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/17/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 6.00 17.5 10.53
0.4 5.40 16.4 44.57
0.8 5.40 16.1 41.34
Final 1.2 15:30 5.30 16.1 31.86
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 14:25 6.30 17.1 8.54
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
53
Bob Bryant
Clear
0.4
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
28.26
30.50
55
55
55
2.24
Disposable Teflon Bailer
10/18/2016
14:25
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
60
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-16R
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/17/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 6.00 19.7 2.16
1 vol 6.10 18.3 97.11
2 vol 6.20 18.0 142.00
Final 3vol 12:06 6.20 18.0 161.30
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 13:20 6.40 20.7 29.13
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab ENCO
HCL
HNO3
798
785
765
766
10/18/2016
13:20
disposable teflon bailer
841
Electric Water Level Probe
Disposable Teflon Bailer
TOC
16.60
21.60
Bob Bryant
Clear
5'
0.87
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-17R
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 14:45 4.84 18.6
1.0 14:48 4.98 18.0
3.0 14:54 5.04 17.7
Final 4.5 15:00 5.05 17.7 436.80
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 10:20 5.04 18.5 14.16
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments:
Lab
69
Gary Simcox
1.5
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
42.29
51.10
66
65
68
8.81
Disposable Teflon Bailer
10/19/2016
10:20
disposable teflon bailer
This well could be purged with and sampled with a pump.
ENCO
Clear
HCL
HNO3
73
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-18
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 8:40 6.12 15.1
1.0 8:45 6.13 15.3 51.83
Final
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
227
223
4.68
Electric Water Level Probe
Disposable Teflon Bailer
TOC
27.32
32.00
Gary Simcox
0.0
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-19
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 5.70 15.2 0.28
5.60 15.5 0.13
5.90 15.6 7.37
Final 8:45 5.90 15.7 0.01
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 9:30 6.40 16.5 3.91
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
155
Bob Bryant
Clear
7.7
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
27.70
72.00
153
155
155
44.30
Field Cleaned Typhoon Pump
10/19/2016
9:30
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
132
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-20
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/17/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 5.80 18.7 274.30
1.8 5.60 17.2 51.94
3.7 5.80 16.7 14.45
Final 5.5 5.40 16.7 9.81
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 5.60 19.7 0.78
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab ENCO
HCL
HNO3
143
131
120
116
10/18/2016
15:25
disposable teflon bailer
148
Electric Water Level Probe
Disposable Teflon Bailer
TOC
16.39
27.00
Bob Bryant
Clear
No tag
10.61
1.8
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-21
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 8:00 5.26 16.2
1.0 8:05 5.31 16.1
2.0 8:10 5.31 16.1 23.97
Final
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
Gary Simcox
0.5
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
40.36
43.60
107
92
86
3.24
Disposable Teflon Bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-24
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 11:06 5.22 17.1
1.0 11:10 5.20 16.3
2.0 11:14 5.22 16.3 52.59
Final
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 11:25 5.15 18.2 2.20
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
(1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab ENCO
Clear
HCL
HNO3
242
241
238
10/19/2016
11:25
disposable teflon bailer
This well could be purged with and sampled with a pump.
245
Dissolved Metals Unpreserved
Electric Water Level Probe
Disposable Teflon Bailer
))
TOC
27.71
31.60
Gary Simcox
3.89
0.7
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-25
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 5.60 18.8 1.03
0.2 12:10 5.80 18.6 236.20
Final
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 11:00 5.80 18.9 37.12
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
Bob Bryant
Clear
Well dry at 1 volume
0.2
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
30.39
31.50
167
166
1.11
Disposable Teflon Bailer
10/19/2016
11:00
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
146
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-25A
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 6.80 18.6 45.69
5.1 6.40 18.1 3.37
10.2 6.70 18.0 0.87
Final 15.3 12:00 6.10 17.7 0.33
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 11:00 6.10 19.1 6.86
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab ENCO
HCL
HNO3
151
147
145
142
10/19/2016
11:00
disposable teflon bailer
117
Electric Water Level Probe
Field Cleaned Typhoon Pump
TOC
30.83
60.00
Bob Bryant
Clear
29.17
5.1
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-26
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 7.10 20.4 2.84
1.4 6.20 18.5 58.87
2,8 5.90 18.2 39.52
Final 4.2 16:27 5.80 18.1 19.94
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 12:55 6.00 21.7 0.38
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
12:55
23.00
7.90
107
103
102
10/19/2016
Disposable Teflon Bailer
100
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
15.10
Bob Bryant
Clear
1.4
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle None
95
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-27
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 15:20 5.06 17.7
1.0 15:22 5.13 16.9
3.0 15:27 5.14 16.7
Final 4.5 15:31 5.14 16.7 85.48
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 12:30 5.00 18.0 7.53
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
TOC 1.4
359
353
347
Disposable Teflon Bailer
19.29
27.30
Electric Water Level Probe
Gary Simcox
This well could be purged with and sampled with a pump.
ENCO
Clear
HCL
HNO3
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle None
362
10/19/2016
12:30
disposable teflon bailer
338
8.01
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-28
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 14:10 4.87 18.6
1.0 14:13 4.85 17.7
3.0 14:19 4.85 17.5
Final 5.0 14:26 4.86 17.6 21.07
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 9:45 4.90 17.7 5.02
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments:
Lab
9:45
54.80
9.68
93
49
46
10/19/2016
Disposable Teflon Bailer
46
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
45.12
Gary Simcox
1.7
disposable teflon bailer
This well could be purged with and sampled with a pump.
ENCO
Clear
HCL
HNO3
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle None
49
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-29
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 16:35 5.35 17.8
1.0 16:38 5.45 17.2
2.0 16:42 5.48 17.4 263.20
Final
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 13:20 5.36 18.1 4.68
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle None
245
TOC
43.09
Gary Simcox
0.7
13:20
47.30
4.21
244
244
243
10/19/2016
Disposable Teflon Bailer
Electric Water Level Probe
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-30
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 6.00 19.1 0.45
5.60 17.0 370.00
5.60 16.4 358.00
Final 5.60 16.4 718.70
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 12:40 6.10 19.1 12.90
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
12:40
64.00
9.90
41
46
86
10/19/2016
Disposable Teflon Bailer
94
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
54.10
1.7
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle None
71
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-31
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 15:55 5.61 17.0
2.0 16:02 5.43 16.4
4.0 16:10 5.32 16.1
Final 6.0 16:19 5.57 16.1 156.30
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 12:55 5.55 16.7 65.82
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
disposable teflon bailer
This well could be purged with and sampled with a pump.
ENCO
slightly turbid
HCL
HNO3
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle None
59
TOC
32.48
Gary Simcox
1.8
12:55
42.80
10.32
85
59
48
10:19
Disposable Teflon Bailer
61
Electric Water Level Probe
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-32R
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 0/17/16 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 7.00 18.5 1.45
1.6 6.60 17.7 57.26
3.2 6.60 16.7 83.86
Final 4.8 12:53 5.70 16.6 504.80
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 13:40 7.00 20.7 14.35
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottles
Comments
Lab ENCO
HCL
HNO3
72
67
67
64
10/18/2016
13:40
disposable teflon bailer
81
9.22
Disposable Teflon Bailer
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
18.03
28.05
Bob Bryant
Clear
1.6
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-33
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/17/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 7.50 19.4 13.54
1.6 6.70 18.2 302.10
2.0 13:59 6.00 18.2 261.20
Final
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 13:55 6.40 19.9 1.21
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottles
Comments
Lab
Bob Bryant
Clear
MW-33
1.6
Electric Water Level Probe
Dry at 2 gallons
TOC
16.33
25.30
94
91
95
8.97
Disposable Teflon Bailer
10/18/2016
13:55
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
101
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-33A
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/17/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 6.70 18.5 11.04
8.4 6.80 16.9 3.15
16.8 7.00 16.8 0.28
Final 25.8 13:46 7.00 16.3 0.28
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 14:05 6.60 19.5 1.71
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottles
Comments
Lab ENCO
HCL
HNO3
215
257
250
234
10/18/2016
14:05
disposable teflon bailer
239
48.25
Field Cleaned Typhoon Pump
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
16.30
64.55
Bob Bryant
Clear
8.4
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-35
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 7.00 16.4 79.55
5.60 16.0 >1100
Final
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 10:25 6.20 17.6 12.04
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottles
Comments
Lab ENCO
HCL
HNO3
27
24
10/19/2016
10:25
disposable teflon bailer
23
2.54
Disposable Teflon Bailer
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
34.71
37.25
Bob Bryant
Clear
Well was dry at 1 volume
0.4
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-35A
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 6.00 16.7 165.30
5.9 6.30 16.3 19.01
11,83 6.40 15.9 7.54
Final 17.7 10:30 6.20 16.0 2.06
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final Grab 10:30 6.20 17.5 12.04
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottles
Comments
Lab
63
Bob Bryant
Clear
5.9
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
35.68
69.69
58
62
63
34.01
Field Cleaned Typhoon Pump
10/19/2016
10:40
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
23
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-36
Sampling Personnel (1)(2)
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/18/2016 Purging Equipment
Total Voume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)Turbidity
Initial 0 17:10 5.29 16.2
1.0 17:14 5.27 15.4
2.0 17:18 5.30 15.4
Final 3.0 17:22 5.32 15.5 792.10
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Final 23.0 9:10 5.35 15.6 6.38
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe(1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments:
Lab
TOC 1.0
Gary Simcox
Field Cleaned Mega Monsoon
30.39
36.80
6.41
Electric Water Level Probe
Disposable Teflon Bailer
26
23
20
20
10/19/2016
9:10
Clear
Developed well with monsoon pump (20 gallons) turbidity is <10 ntu
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle None
22
Surface Water and Leachate Samples
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project 1356-07-004
Location Date Time Sampled Sample Observations
SW-1 10/17/2016 15:25 Clear
SW-2 10/17/2016 16:25 Clear
SW-3 10/17/2016 not sampled Dry
SW-4 10/17/2016 13:50 Slightly Turbid
SW-5 10/17/2016 not sampled No Flow
SW-6 10/17/2016 not sampled Dry
Lift Station 10/17/2016 12:45 (Sampled from Pump #2 Lift Station)
Appendix IV – Statistical Analysis Procedures
Appendix V – Graphs Depicting Concentrations over Time for
Wells with a Statistically Significant Increase
Appendix VI– Monthly Methane Data
(April 2016 – October 2016)
L
E
G
E
N
D
WWW.SMEINC.COM
1
METHANE MONTORING LOCATIONS
LINCOLN COUNTY LANDFILL
CROUSE, NORTH CAROLINA
LIFTSTATION
S
C
A
L
E
H
O
U
S
E
S
H
O
P
A
R
E
A