4304_CentralCarolinaTire_Phase1and2_Oct2016_2ndSemiAnnual_DIN27001_20161026

11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
Explanatory Text for Notification Table
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase I/II
Cameron, Harnett, NC
Permit # 43-04
October 3, 2016 Water Quality Monitoring

The results of the October 3, 2016 groundwater and surface water quality monitoring conducted
at the Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase I/II are generally consistent with the results of
previous monitoring conducted at the site. Trace levels of acetone were reported in surface
water samples SW-1 and SW-2. The reported concentrations of acetone are well below the 15A
NCAC 2B surface water quality standard. No other Appendix I VOCs were reported in either
surface water sample. Low levels of various RCRA metals were reported in both surface water
samples. However, the reported concentrations of metals in the surface water samples do not
exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2B surface water quality standards.

None of the reported concentrations of the RCRA metals detected in the groundwater samples
collected from the site on October 3, 2016 exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202
groundwater quality standards. The results of analyses of the groundwater samples for
Appendix I VOCs are generally consistent with the historical data presented in Table 3. Trace
levels of acetone were reported in the samples collected from monitoring wells MW-3, MW-4,
MW-6, and MW-8. The reported concentrations of acetone were well below the 15A NCAC 2L
groundwater quality standard. It is also noted that acetone was detected in an associated blank
sample at a similar concentration to those detected in the groundwater samples. PCE was
reported in the groundwater sample collected from MW-8 (2.1 µg/L) at a concentration that
exceeds the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202 groundwater quality standards. No other
Appendix I VOCs were reported in any of the groundwater samples.

The results of a preliminary site assessment conducted in November 2010, as well as Phase 2,
3 and 4 site assessments conducted in April and May 2012, April 2013, and August 2014,
respectively, indicate that the source of PCE in groundwater at MW-8 is unrelated to the Phase
I/II landfill and is located in the vicinity of the maintenance shelter located north of MW-8. The
results of the preliminary site assessment are reported in the January 2011 Preliminary Site
Assessment Report, the results of the second phase of assessment are reported in the June
2012 Phase 2 Hydrogeologic and Groundwater Quality Assessment Report, the results of the
third phase of assessment are reported in the May 2013 Phase 3 Hydrogeologic and
Groundwater Quality Assessment Report, and the results of the Phase 4 site assessment are
reported in the October 2014 Phase 4 Hydrogeologic and Groundwater Quality Assessment
Report, all of which were previously submitted to the NCDENR Solid Waste Section.

11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 C ell ● [e-mail]

October 26, 2016

Ms. Elizabeth S. Werner, Hydrogeologist
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1646

RE: Report of Results
Semi-Annual Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring: October 2016
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase I/II
Cameron, Harnett County, NC
Permit # 43-04

Dear Ms. Werner:

This report presents the results of semi-annual groundwater and surface water quality
monitoring conducted at the landfill site referenced above (Figure 1) on October 3, 2016. The
scope of work performed included sampling and laboratory analysis of groundwater samples
from eight on-site monitoring wells (MW-2 through MW-9) and surface water samples from two
on-site locations (SW-1 and SW-2). The groundwater and surface water samples were
collected in accordance with the NCDEQ, Division of Waste Management (DWM), Solid Waste
Section (SWS), Groundwater Monitoring Guidance Document, and the facility Water Quality
Monitoring Plan. The sampling and data collection methods, as well as the current and
historical results of field and laboratory testing of the water samples, are presented in the
following sections.

1.0 POTENTIOMETRIC PATTERN AND GROUNDWATER FLOW

Groundwater levels were gauged in the site groundwater monitoring wells on October 3, 2016
as part of the site monitoring. Depths to groundwater were measured using an electronic water
level probe that was thoroughly decontaminated between wells with a non-phosphate soap and
water wash followed in order by multiple rinses with distilled water, an isopropyl alcohol rinse,
and multiple distilled water rinses. Depth to groundwater measurements were made after the
wells were opened for a sufficient period of time to allow water levels to equilibrate with
atmospheric pressure. The locations of the site monitoring wells are depicted in Figure 2.
Groundwater elevation data collected at the monitoring wells on October 3, 2016 are presented
in Table 1. The depth to groundwater across the site, relative to the top of the PVC casing of
– 2 – October 26, 2016
11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
the monitoring wells, ranged from 2.50 feet at MW-2 to 15.63 feet at MW-9, which is consistent
with the surface topography.

A water-table elevation contour map that was developed based on the October 3, 2016
groundwater-gauging data for the Type II monitoring wells is presented as Figure 3. The
pattern of the water-table contours indicates that the horizontal component of shallow
groundwater flow at the site is generally to the east-southeast, which is consistent with the
surface topography and drainage features at the site. The average hydraulic gradient of the
water table, based on the data depicted in Figure 3, ranges from approximately 0.037 ft./ft. in
west-southwest portion of the site to approximately 0.017 ft./ft. in the east-northeast portion of
the site.

2.0 RESULTS OF GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

Groundwater samples were collected from the site monitoring wells and surface water samples
were collected from two on-site locations on October 3, 2016 for laboratory analysis to monitor
the quality of groundwater and surface water at the site. The groundwater and surface water
samples were collected and handled in accordance with the sampling protocols included in the
site Water Quality Monitoring Plan as well as the SWS Groundwater Monitoring Guidance
Document. It is noted that monitoring well MW-9 serves as the upgradient, natural background
well for the facility, and monitoring wells MW-2 through MW-7 serve as the downgradient
monitoring wells. Monitoring well MW-8 is located immediately north of the landfill. Based on its
location relative to the groundwater elevation contours, MW-8 is located hydraulically cross-
gradient to the northern-most area of the landfill and hydraulically up gradient of most of the
landfill area. All reusable sampling equipment was properly decontaminated between sampling
locations with a non-phosphate soap and water wash, followed by multiple rinses with distilled
water. New disposable nitrile or latex gloves were worn during all sampling activities.
Disposable sampling equipment/material was discarded after each use.

Prior to groundwater sampling, all monitoring wells were purged using pre-cleaned Teflon-lined
disposable polyethylene tubing connected to a peristaltic pump under low flow conditions.
During purging, measurements were made in the field of the pH, temperature, specific
conductance and turbidity of the groundwater collected from the monitoring wells, in accordance
with SWS requirements. The results of the field analyses of these parameters are presented in
Table 1. Copies of Groundwater Sampling Forms containing pertinent information recorded in
the field during purging and sampling at each groundwater monitoring well are presented in
Appendix A. The results of the field-measured water-quality parameters indicate that the
values measured in groundwater collected from the site monitoring wells were generally within
the applicable stabilization criteria (see Groundwater Sampling Forms). Groundwater at the site
is acidic to slightly acidic based on the pH values measured in the field (3.70 to 5.89). Specific
– 3 – October 26, 2016
11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
conductance values ranged from 58 (MW-7) to 202 (MW-6) µS/cm. Turbidity values ranged
from 2.31 (MW-7) to 13.1 (MW-2) nephelometric turbidity units (NTUs).

Surface water samples were collected from locations SW-1 and SW-2. The sampling locations
are depicted in Figure 2. SW-1 is located approximately 140-feet south-southeast of the south-
central sedimentation pond and within the drainage feature that parallels the southern limits of
scrap tire disposal within the Phase I/II landfill. SW-2 is located approximately 250-feet south-
southeast of the southeastern sedimentation pond and within the primary drainage feature that
parallels the eastern limits of the Phase I/II landfill. The surface water samples from SW-1 and
SW-2 were collected in accordance with the protocol presented in the SWS Groundwater
Monitoring Guidance Document.

All groundwater and surface water samples were analyzed at a North Carolina-certified
laboratory for Appendix I volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by SW 846 Method 8260 and the
8 RCRA metals by EPA 6000/7000 series methods. Summarized results of laboratory analyses
for groundwater and surface water samples collected from the site on October 3, 2016 are
presented in Table 2. Summarized historical groundwater and surface water quality data for the
site are presented in Table 3. Copies of the original laboratory reports are included in
Appendix B.

The laboratory analytical results for surface water samples SW-1 and SW-2 indicate that trace
levels of acetone were reported in samples SW-1 and SW-2 (6.6 µg/L and 5.6 µg/L,
respectively). The reported concentrations of acetone were well below the 15A NCAC 2B
surface water quality standard. No other Appendix I VOCs were reported in either sample. Low
levels of various RCRA metals were reported in both surface water samples. However, the
reported concentrations of metals in the surface water samples do not exceed the
corresponding 15A NCAC 2B surface water quality standards.

The laboratory analytical results for the groundwater samples collected from the site monitoring
wells on October 3, 2016 indicate that trace levels of acetone were reported in the samples
collected from monitoring wells MW-3, MW-4, MW-6, and MW-8. The reported concentrations
of acetone were well below the 15A NCAC 2L groundwater quality standard. It is also noted that
acetone was detected in an associated blank sample at a similar concentration to those
detected in the groundwater samples. Tetrachloroethene (PCE) was reported at a concentration
of 2.1 µg/L in the groundwater sample collected from MW-8, which exceeds the 15A NCAC 2L
.0202 groundwater quality standard of 0.70 µg/L. It is noted that the results of a preliminary site
assessment conducted in November 2010, as well as Phase 2, 3 and 4 site assessments
conducted in April and May 2012, April 2013, and August 2014, respectively, indicate that the
source of PCE in groundwater at MW-8 is unrelated to the Phase I/II landfill and is located in the
vicinity of the maintenance shelter north of MW-8. No other Appendix I VOCs were reported in
any of the groundwater samples.
– 4 – October 26, 2016
11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]

The results of the metals analyses of the groundwater samples indicate that arsenic was
reported in three of the samples, barium and lead were reported in all of the samples, cadmium
was reported in seven of the samples, chromium was reported in three of the samples, mercury
was not reported in any of the samples, selenium was reported in six of the groundwater
samples, and silver was reported in three of the samples. None of the reported concentrations
of the metals detected in any of the groundwater samples exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC
2L .0202 groundwater quality standards.

3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The results of the October 3, 2016 groundwater and surface water quality monitoring conducted
at the Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase I/II are generally consistent with the results of
previous monitoring conducted at the site. Trace levels of acetone were reported in surface
water samples SW-1 and SW-2. The reported concentrations of acetone are well below the 15A
NCAC 2B surface water quality standard. No other Appendix I VOCs were reported in either
surface water sample. Low levels of various RCRA metals were reported in both surface water
samples. However, the reported concentrations of metals in the surface water samples do not
exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2B surface water quality standards.

None of the reported concentrations of the RCRA metals detected in the groundwater samples
collected from the site on October 3, 2016 exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202
groundwater quality standards. The results of analyses of the groundwater samples for
Appendix I VOCs are generally consistent with the historical data presented in Table 3. Trace
levels of acetone were reported in the samples collected from monitoring wells MW-3, MW-4,
MW-6, and MW-8. The reported concentrations of acetone were well below the 15A NCAC 2L
groundwater quality standard. It is also noted that acetone was detected in an associated blank
sample at a similar concentration to those detected in the groundwater samples. PCE was
reported in the groundwater sample collected from MW-8 (2.1 µg/L) at a concentration that
exceeds the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202 groundwater quality standards. No other
Appendix I VOCs were reported in any of the groundwater samples.

The results of a preliminary site assessment conducted in November 2010, as well as Phase 2,
3 and 4 site assessments conducted in April and May 2012, April 2013, and August 2014,
respectively, indicate that the source of PCE in groundwater at MW-8 is unrelated to the Phase
I/II landfill and is located in the vicinity of the maintenance shelter located north of MW-8. The
results of the preliminary site assessment are reported in the January 2011 Preliminary Site
Assessment Report, the results of the second phase of assessment are reported in the June
2012 Phase 2 Hydrogeologic and Groundwater Quality Assessment Report, the results of the
third phase of assessment are reported in the May 2013 Phase 3 Hydrogeologic and
Groundwater Quality Assessment Report, and the results of the Phase 4 site assessment are
– 5 – October 26, 2016
11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
reported in the October 2014 Phase 4 Hydrogeologic and Groundwater Quality Assessment
Report, all of which were previously submitted to the NCDENR Solid Waste Section.

Based on the results of the October 3, 2016 monitoring event, it is recommended that
semiannual detection groundwater monitoring continue without modification. If you have any
questions or require further assistance regarding this report, please call me at 919-995-0363.
The next water quality monitoring event for the Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill is
scheduled for April 2017.

Sincerely,
Nautilus Geologic Consulting, PLLC
Brian S. Boutin, P.G.
Consulting Geologist

Cc: Tim McNeil, Central Carolina Holdings, Inc.
Vance Moore, Garrett and Moore, Inc.
Craig Fortner, Garrett & Moore, Inc.
Drawn by: Reviewed by: Drawing #:
Drawing Date: 1
SITE LOCATION MAP
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill
Harnett County, North Carolina
Source: USGS 7.5’ Topographic Quadrangle Series
Murchisontown, NC 2010
Figure No. Project #:
Scale: USGS
1:24,000 05/31/2012
N
11112 Branding Iron Place Wendell, NC 27591
Office: [phone]
Cell: [phone]
Central Carolina Tire
300
305
310
315
320
320
325
325
330
330
335
335
34
0
34
5
35
0
3
5
5
(306.80)
(306.33)
(316.65)
(318.37)(299.00)
(311.60)
(337.36)
(363.07)
MW-2 20.0 2.0 309.30 2.50 306.80 20.9 4.62 75 13.1
MW-3 20.0 2.0 315.20 8.87 306.33 20.4 5.70 130 5.26
MW-4 20.0 2.0 320.80 4.15 316.65 24.5 4.69 72 12.4
MW-5 20.0 2.0 322.40 4.03 318.37 20.2 5.26 77 2.88
MW-6 25.0 2.0 305.10 6.10 299.00 20.2 5.89 202 4.09
MW-7 20.0 2.0 315.80 4.20 311.60 22.8 4.13 58 2.31
MW-8 20.0 2.0 342.80 5.44 337.36 23.1 4.33 64 5.65
MW-9 30.0 2.0 378.70 15.63 363.07 21.5 3.70 104 3.8
Notes:
MSL = Mean Sea Level
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
Monitoring well construction data taken from October-December 2006 Sampling Event Monitoring Report prepared by Withers & Ravenel.
Well Depth
(Feet BGS)
BGS = Below Ground Surface
GW = Groundwater
October 3, 2016
pH S.C.
umhos/cm
S.C. = Specific Conductance
Permit # 43-04
Monitoring Well and Groundwater Data
Table 1
October 2016 Sampling Event
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase I/II
Harnett County, North Carolina
Well
Identity
ntu = Nephelometric Turbidity Units
Temp. Co
Well Diameter
(Inches)
Field Parameters
Turbidity
(ntu)
Top of Casing
Elevation
(Feet MSL)
Groundwater
Elevation
(Feet MSL)
Depth to
Groundwater
(Feet BTOC)
ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS GWP Std NCAC 2L STD
(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)
Acetone 6.6 5.6 ND 4.9 J 4.7 J ND 11 ND 4.6 J ND NE 6000
Acrylonitrile ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE NE
Benzene ND 0.57 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 1
Bromochloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.6 NE
Bromodichloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.6
Bromoform (Tribromoethane)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 4
Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 10
2-Butanone (MEK), (Methyl Ethyl Ketone)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 4000
Carbon Disulfide ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 700
Carbon Tetrachloride ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.3
Chlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 50
Chloroethane (Ethyl Chloride)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 3000
Chloroform (Trichloromethane)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 70
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.04
Dibromochloromethane (Chlorodibromomethane)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.41 0.4
1,2,-Dibromoethane (Ethylene Dibromide)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.02
Dibromomethane (Methylene Bromide)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.5 70
1,2-Dichlorobenzene (O-Dichlorobenzene)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 20
1,3-Dichlorobenzene (M-Dichlorobenzene)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 200
1,4-Dichlorobenzene (P-Dichlorobenzene)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 6
Trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE NE
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 6
1,2-Dichloroethane (Ethylene Dichloride)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.4
1,1-Dichloroethene (Vinylidene Chloride)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 7
1,2-Dichloroethene (cis and trans isomers)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 60 60
1,2-Dichloropropane (Propylene Dichloride)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.6
1,1-Dichloropropene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE NE
1,3-Dichloropropene (cis and trans isomers)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.4
Ethylbenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 600
Iodomethane (Methyl Iodide)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE NE
2-Hexanone (Methyl Butyl Ketone)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 40
Methyl Chloride (Chloromethane)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 3
Methylene Chloride (Dichloromethane)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 5
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (Methyl Isobutyl Ketone)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 560 NE
Styrene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 70
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.18 0.2
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene), (PCE)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.1 ND NE 0.7
Toluene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 600
1,1,1-Trichloroethane (Methylchloroform)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 200
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.6 0.6
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene), (TCE)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 3
Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 2000
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.005
Vinyl Acetate ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 88 88
Vinyl Chloride ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.03
Total Xylenes ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 500
INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS GWP Std NCAC 2L STD
(in ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)
Arsenic 0.30 J 0.76 J ND 0.65 J ND ND 2.2 0.37 J ND ND NE 10
Barium 41 41 75 17 19 17 44 35 31 89 NE 700
Cadmium 0.025 J 0.18 J 0.067J 0.20 J 0.80 J 0.26 J ND 0.42 J 0.079 J 0.11 J NE 2
Chromium 0.56 J 0.58 J ND 0.66 J ND 0.59 J ND 0.71 J ND ND NE 10
Lead 0.40 J 0.46 J 1.1 0.33 J 0.70 J 0.083 J 0.59 J 2.7 0.64 J 2.5 NE 15
Mercury ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 1
Selenium 0.69 J 0.97 J 0.68 J 2.3 ND 0.93 J 0.96 J 0.48 J ND 0.61 J NE 20
Silver ND 0.012 J ND ND ND 0.079 J ND ND 0.021 J 0.027 J NE 20
Notes:
Values in boldface exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202 groundwater quality standard for Class GA groundwater.J = Estimated value above laboratory method detection limit and below SWSL or reporting limit.
NCAC 2L STD = North Carolina Groundwater Standard established in Title 15A of North Carolina Administrative Code Subchapter 2L B = Analyte found in associated field and/or laboratory blank.
GWP Std = Solid Waste Section Groundwater Protection Standard
ND = None detected above laboratory method detection limit.
MW-8MW-3
Laboratory Results for Surface Water and Groundwater Samples
MW-9MW-2
October 3, 2016
Permit # 43-04
MW-4
October 2016 Sampling Event
MW-7
NS = Not Sampled, No sample exists for this sampling period
Table 2
SW-1 SW-2 MW-5 MW-6
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase I/II, Harnett County, NC
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/26/05 3/30/06 10/19/06 4/18/07 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/22/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/6/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/1/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16 10/3/16
Well No:MW-2Arsenic 10 ND ND ND 2.43 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.80 J ND 0.55 J 0.73 J ND ND ND ND 0.39 J ND NDBarium70017015211092.1 JB 162.0 97.5 JB 86.7 JB 115 B 73.4 JB 110.0 69.0 94.0 81.0 95.0 87.0 88.0 74.0 97.0 68.0 90.0 76.0 87.0 75
Cadmium 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.29 J 0.18 J 10.00 0.93 J ND ND 0.46 J 0.20 J 0.22 J 0.050 J 0.077 J ND 0.081 J 0.11 J 0.067J
Chromium 10 ND ND ND 4.58 JB 3.11 J 2.03 JB 1.77 JB 2.91 JB 2.67 JB ND 1.5 J ND 6.10 ND 2.3 B 0.83 JB ND ND 0.76 J 1.50 2.70 0.87 J ND
Lead 15 ND ND ND 1.09 J 3.97 J ND ND 4.82 J ND 1.6 J 0.68 J ND 0.45 J ND 0.73 J 1.10 1.60 1.30 1.20 1.20 2.50 1.50 1.1
Mercury 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Selenium 20 ND ND ND 3.98 J ND 8.75 J ND ND ND 3.3 J ND ND 2.60 3.30 3.30 2.30 0.45 J 0.66 J ND ND 1.60 1.40 0.68 JSilver20NDNDNDNDND2.36 JB 3.57 JB 1.16 JB 1.25 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.015 J ND1,4-Dichlorobenzene 6 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.23 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Methylene Chloride 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.160 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Toluene 600 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.260 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Total Xylenes 500 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.390 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/26/05 3/30/06 10/19/06 4/18/07 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/22/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/6/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/1/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16 10/3/16
Well No:MW-3Arsenic 10 ND ND 3.3 J 3.39 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.92 J ND 2.10 3.20 2.40 2.70 0.98 J 0.39 J 0.95 J 0.88 J 2.00 1.00 0.65 JBarium700ND30.5 34.1 20.0 JB 38.4 J 25.5 JB 28.6 JB 29.5 JB 41.2 JB 31.0 39.0 37.0 44.0 40.0 50.0 39.0 42.0 16.0 33.0 22.0 53.0 26.0 17
Cadmium 2 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.40 ND ND ND ND ND 0.11 J 0.034 J ND ND 0.079 J 0.077 J 0.20 J
Chromium 10 ND ND ND 5.06 JB 1.69 J 2.62 JB 2.62 JB 4.29 JB 2.95 JB ND 1.5 J ND 4.80 ND 2.3 B 0.70 JB ND ND ND 1.40 0.72 J ND 0.66 J
Lead 15 ND ND ND 1.31 J 3.60 J ND 3.77 J 5.60 J 7.01 J 0.97 J 1.9 J 1.2 J 2.30 1.70 2.70 1.10 1.20 0.20 J 0.39 J 0.40 J 2.00 0.45 J 0.33 J
Mercury 1 ND ND ND 0.038 J 0.133 J 0.064 J 0.090 J 0.089 J 0.36 0.056 J ND 0.19 J ND 0.21 ND ND ND ND 0.035 J 0.025 J ND ND NDSelenium20NDNDND5.79 J ND 9.5 J ND ND ND ND 7.60 ND 9.20 11.00 13.00 9.60 3.50 0.93 J 3.60 2.80 9.00 3.80 2.3Silver20NDNDNDNDND2.27 JB 3.74 JB 1.60 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.011 J NDAcetone6000NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND32.3 J ND ND ND ND 2.7 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 4.9 J
Benzene 1 ND ND ND ND 0.610 J ND ND 0.260 J 0.55 J ND ND ND 0.76 0.51 0.85 ND ND ND ND ND 0.84 ND ND
Bromomethane 10 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.0 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 560 ND ND 0.97 J ND ND ND ND ND 2.8 J 0.56 J 0.89 J ND 0.97 J ND 4.8 J ND ND 1.2 J 5 ND 0.85 J ND ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 6 ND ND ND 0.270 J 0.620 J ND ND 0.280 J 0.47 J ND ND ND 0.67 0.47 0.67 ND ND ND ND ND 0.51 ND ND1,2-Dichloroethene (isomers)60 ND 1.5 1.7 0.760 J 2.04 J ND 0.230 J 0.660 J 1.21 J 0.53 J 0.84 0.59 2 1.0 2.2 0.7 0.83 ND ND ND 1.40 ND NDMethylene Chloride 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.110 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Toluene 600 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.270 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Total Xylenes 500 ND ND ND ND 0.140 J ND 0.330 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND1.1 ND 0.490 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.59 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/26/05 3/30/06 10/19/06 4/18/07 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/22/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/6/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/1/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16 10/3/16
Well No:MW-4
Arsenic 10 ND ND 2.9 J 4.16 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.20 1.10 1.20 1.60 1.30 0.95 J 0.72 J ND 0.42 J 0.33 J ND
Barium 700 ND 23.7 20 20.9 JB 24.3 J 33.2 JB 29.6 JB 29.6 JB 22.2 JB 28.0 28.0 20.0 25.0 20.0 16.0 18.0 23.0 15.0 16.0 20.0 22.0 22.0 19
Cadmium 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.16 J ND 0.21 J ND 0.48 J ND ND ND 0.26 J 0.058 J 0.57 J 0.034 J 0.18 J ND 0.096 J 0.21 J 0.80 J
Chromium 10 ND ND ND 4.09 JB 3.11 J 2.77 JB ND 3.40 JB 2.86 JB ND 1.6 J ND 5.00 ND 2.3 B 0.81 JB ND ND ND 0.54 J 0.78 J 0.54 J NDLead15NDNDND3.12 J 6.11 J ND ND ND ND ND 0.96 J ND 0.74 J ND 0.81 J 0.79 J 0.85 J 0.26 J 0.56 J 0.29 J 0.48 J 0.47 J 0.70 JMercury1NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDSelenium20NDNDND3.73 J ND ND ND ND ND ND 3.4 J ND 2.40 2.90 3.00 2.40 0.78 J 0.39 J ND ND 1.00 ND ND
Silver 20 ND ND ND ND ND 2.17 JB 3.90 JB 1.97 JB 1.03 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Acetone 6000 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 4.7 J
Benzene 1 ND ND ND 0.730 J 0.540 J 0.480 J 0.220 J 0.460 J ND 0.56 J ND 0.87 ND 0.93 0.92 0.91 0.77 0.51 ND 0.69 0.69 ND ND
Chloroethane 3000 ND 4.2 1.6 3.59 J 1.99 J 2.35 J 0.820 J 2.55 J ND 1.3 J ND 1.2 ND 1.7 1.4 1.9 ND 0.79 ND 1.1 ND ND ND1,1-Dichloroethane 6 ND 1.0 ND 0.350 J 0.560 J 0.210 J ND 0.160 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND1,2-Dichloroethane 0.4 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,2-Dichloroethene (isomers)60 ND ND ND 0.210 J 0.560 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 560 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.53 J ND ND ND ND ND ND
Toluene 600 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.310 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Total Xylenes 500 ND ND ND ND 0.110 J ND 0.540 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/26/05 3/30/06 10/19/06 4/18/07 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/22/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/6/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/1/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16 10/3/16
Well No:MW-5
Arsenic 10 ND ND ND 4.83 JB 1.93 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.55 J 1.30 1.10 0.47 J 0.46 J ND ND ND ND ND ND
Barium 700 ND ND 19.3 58.2 JB 32.3 J 30.8 JB 30.9 JB 33.6 JB 23.8 JB 30.0 28.0 31.0 27.0 32.0 33.0 27.0 31.0 23.0 23.0 22.0 17.0 16.0 17Cadmium2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.22 J 0.45 J ND ND ND 0.043 J 0.12 J ND ND 0.098 J 0.068 J 0.17 J 0.26 JChromium10NDNDND8.54 JB 5.67 J 1.58 JB 1.25 JB 4.10 JB 2.39 JB 0.60 J 1.7 J ND 5.00 ND 2.3 B 0.77 JB ND ND 0.32 J ND 0.81 J ND 0.59 J
Lead 15 ND ND ND 14.5 6.02 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.34 J 0.39 J 0.87 J 0.064 J ND ND 0.64 J 0.26 J 0.083 J
Mercury 1 ND ND ND 0.058 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Selenium 20 ND ND ND 5.42 J ND ND ND ND ND ND 3.2 J ND 4.40 5.10 6.80 3.20 0.66 J 0.59 J ND 2.70 1.30 0.53 J 0.93 J
Silver 20 ND ND ND ND ND 2.32 JB 3.74 JB 1.72 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.081 J ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.037 J 0.079 J
Bromoform 4 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.16 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDToluene600NDNDNDNDNDND0.210 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDTotal Xylenes 500 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.280 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/26/05 3/30/06 10/19/06 4/18/07 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/22/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/6/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/1/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16 10/3/16
Well No:MW-6
Arsenic 10 ND ND 2.8 J 2.25 JB ND ND ND 3.08 J ND ND 0.9 J ND 2.20 2.20 1.70 1.60 0.98 J 0.69 J 1.30 0.88 J 3.30 1.30 2.2
Barium 700 ND 37.4 29.9 30.5 JB 26.3 J 36.1 JB 34.1 JB 30.1 JB 21.3 JB 13.0 16 J 18.0 14.0 28.0 22.0 31.0 29.0 31.0 39.0 36.0 42.0 43.0 44
Cadmium 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.26 J ND 0.37 J ND ND 0.088 J 0.054 J ND 1.90 0.15 J 0.10 J 0.13 J NDChromium10NDNDND5.05 JB 1.31 J 1.88 JB ND ND 2.76 JB 0.60 J 1.2 J ND 4.40 ND 2.7 B 1.2 B ND ND ND 0.31 J 0.97 J ND NDLead15NDNDND1.62 J 4.43 J 6.14 J 3.70 J 3.50 J ND 0.74 J 2.7 J ND 0.87 J ND 0.44 J 0.58 J 0.44 J 0.26 J 0.33 J 0.90 J 2.20 0.61 J 0.59 J
Mercury 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Selenium 20 ND ND ND 4.75 J ND ND ND ND ND 2.8 J 3.9 J ND 5.80 6.60 6.00 4.40 1.10 0.79 J 1.20 2.60 2.10 1.00 0.96 J
Silver 20 ND ND ND ND ND 2.34 JB 3.79 JB 1.47 JB 0.78 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.060 J ND
Acetone 6000 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.74 J 3.34 J 6.0 J 3.1 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 11Benzene1NDND1.4 1.21 1.03 0.780 J 0.880 J 0.990 J 0.81 J 0.56 J ND ND ND 0.26 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDToluene600NDNDNDNDNDND0.180 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDTotal Xylenes 500 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.380 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase I/II
0.03 ND
Table 3
Vinyl Chloride
Permit # 43-04
Harnett County, North Carolina
Historical Summary of Constituent Detections
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/26/05 3/30/06 10/19/06 4/18/07 10/24/07 4/29/08 ND 4/22/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/6/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/1/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16 10/3/16
Well No:MW-7
Arsenic 10 ND ND ND 3.88 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.5 J ND 1.20 1.80 1.40 0.54 J 0.40 J 0.39 J 1.00 ND 0.58 J 0.40 J 0.37 J
Barium 700 ND 77 73.6 163 JB 64.2 J 70.7 JB 61.8 JB 63.0 JB 70.0 JB 67.0 65.0 67.0 54.0 65.0 59.0 62.0 52.0 64.0 55.0 59.0 52.0 62.0 35
Cadmium 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.17 J ND ND ND ND ND 0.11 J ND ND ND 0.059 J 0.12 J 0.42 J
Chromium 10 ND ND ND 5.47 JB ND 1.58 JB 1.46 JB 3.01 JB 3.05 JB ND 2.6 J ND 4.50 ND 2.8 B 1.3 B ND 0.57 J ND 0.86 J 0.55 J 0.57 J 0.71 J
Lead 15 ND ND 2.1 J 10.60 6.54 J 5.69 J 4.02 JB 5.74 JB 6.97 J 3.2 J 9.20 2.7 J 4.10 2.50 4.50 3.60 4.00 4.90 1.50 3.60 2.60 2.60 2.7Mercury1NDNDND0.043 J 0.097 J 0.062 J ND ND 0.117 J 0.023 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDSelenium20NDNDND3.05 J ND 7.96 J ND ND ND ND 3.7 J ND 4.40 5.10 4.70 3.60 0.96 J 0.70J 1.20 ND 1.90 0.47 J 0.48 J
Silver 20 ND ND ND ND ND 2.25 JB 3.62 JB 1.69 JB 0.94 J ND ND ND 0.062 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Acetone 6000 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 8.70 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Benzene 1 ND ND ND ND 0.790 J 0.210 J 0.250 J 0.330 J 0.61 J ND ND ND 0.65 0.68 0.64 ND 0.61 ND 0.61 ND 0.79 ND ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 6 ND ND ND ND 0.150 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND1,2-Dichloroethene (isomers)60 ND ND ND ND 0.240 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDMethylene Chloride 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.23 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDToluene600NDNDNDNDND0.250 JB 0.320 J ND ND ND 4.90 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Total Xylenes 500 ND ND ND ND 0.130 J ND 0.520 J ND 0.11 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/26/05 3/30/06 10/19/06 4/18/07 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/22/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/6/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/1/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16 10/3/16
Well No:MW-8
Arsenic 10 ND ND ND 2.03 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.35 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Barium 700 ND 41.5 42.5 32.1 JB 41.4 J 43.9 JB 46.1 JB 45.0 JB 39.2 JB 38.0 33.0 40.0 41.0 22.0 60.0 61.0 56.0 49.0 41.0 42.0 40.0 42.0 31Cadmium2NDND1.1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.59 J 0.17 J ND ND ND 0.12 J 0.064 J 0.053 J ND 0.092 J 0.16 J 0.17 J 0.079 JChromium10NDNDND5.03 JB 4.54 J 2.33 JB 1.25 JB 3.20 JB 2.95 JB 0.56 J 1.3 J ND 3.70 ND 2.3 B 1.2 B ND 0.47 J 0.82 J 0.52 J 0.88 J 0.72 J NDLead15NDNDND1.04 J 7.71 J 7.42 J ND 6.30 J ND 1.1 J 0.72 J 1.1 J 0.74 J ND 1.00 0.94 J 1.30 1.80 1.30 0.75 J 1.20 1.00 0.64 J
Mercury 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Selenium 20 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.7 J 0.33 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Silver 20 ND ND ND ND ND 2.28 JB 3.90 JB 1.29 JB 0.8 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.013 J 0.021 J
Acetone 6000 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 4.6 J1,2-Dichloroethene (isomers)60 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.99 ND 1.20 ND ND NDEthylbenzene29NDNDNDNDNDND0.120 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Tetrachloroethene 0.7 ND ND 1.8 0.310 J 0.550 J 0.730 J 0.960 J 2.40 1.74 B 6.30 1.80 5.40 6.90 3.40 4.40 3.60 4.00 9.20 6.90 8.20 5.80 4.40 2.10
Toluene 600 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.450 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Total Xylenes 500 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.700 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/26/05 3/30/06 10/19/06 4/18/07 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/22/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/6/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/1/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16 10/3/16
Well No:MW-9
Arsenic 10 ND ND 2.6 J 2.88 JB 5.04 J ND ND ND ND 15 ND 13 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1 NDBarium700360242310462 JB 366.0 288 B 50.1 JB 210 B 311 B 680.0 230.0 940 390 800 390 320 540 640 430 510 590 950 89Cadmium2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.21 J 0.23 J 0.52 J 0.31 J ND ND 0.38 J 0.22 J 0.28 J 0.29 J 0.21 J 0.29 J 0.28 J 0.67 J 0.11 J
Chromium 10 ND ND ND 5.71 JB 1.24 J 1.73 JB 1.35 JB 2.82 JB 5.21 JB 1.0 J 2 J ND 8.3 J ND 3.2 B 1.2 B ND ND ND 0.50 J 1 2 ND
Lead 15 ND ND ND 7.21 J 6.84 J 5.02 J ND ND ND 10.00 3.4 J 10 4 6 5 3 7 8 7.1 J 10 10 18 2.5
Mercury 1 ND ND ND 0.83 0.077 J ND ND ND ND 0.12 J ND 0.77 0.35 0.23 0.075 J 0.18 J 0.051 J ND ND 0.12 J 0.14 J 0.068 J ND
Selenium 20 ND ND 2.2 J 1.35 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 4 2 1 ND 2 2 3 3 6 0.61 J
Silver 20 ND ND ND ND ND ND 3.95 JB 1.18 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.34 J ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.032 J 0.027 JBromoform4NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.28 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDEthylbenzene600NDNDNDNDNDND0.210 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Methylene Chloride 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.16 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Toluene 600 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.810 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Total Xylenes 500 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.31 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/26/05 3/30/06 10/19/06 4/18/07 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/22/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/6/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/1/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16 10/3/16
Well No:SW-1
Arsenic 10 ND ND 2.2 J 2.07 JB 2.86 J ND 2.78 J ND ND ND 0.61 J ND 1.90 ND 1.60 0.98 J 0.65 J 0.51 J ND ND 1.50 0.45 J 0.30 JBarium700NDND17.6 18.7 JB 25.5 J 30.4 JB 384 B 36.2 JB 21.1 JB 19.00 32.00 38.00 38.00 24.00 29.00 23.00 24.00 23.00 44.00 30.00 29.00 68.00 41Cadmium2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.370 J 0.28 J ND 0.3 J ND ND ND ND 0.20 J 0.052 J ND ND ND 0.091 J 0.081 J 0.025 J
Chromium 10 ND ND ND 5.76 JB 2.66 J 2.03 JB 2.09 JB 3.70 JB 2.49 JB 0.70 J 1.3 J ND 5.00 ND 2.6 B 1.5 B ND ND ND 0.91 J 3.80 ND 0.56 J
Lead 15 ND ND ND ND 5.39 J 6.07 J 7.11 J 3.91 JB ND ND ND ND 0.27 J ND 0.35 J 0.23 J 0.41 J 0.34 J 0.24 J 0.29 J 2.20 0.43 J 0.40 J
Mercury 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Selenium 20 ND ND 3.7 J 1.96 J ND ND ND ND ND ND 3.3 J ND 4.40 3.00 3.90 1.90 0.45 J 0.40 J ND ND 1.50 1.40 0.69 JSilver20NDNDNDNDND2.46 JB 2.07 JB 1.38 JB 0.87 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDAcetone6000NDNDNDNDND2.51 JB ND ND ND ND 2.8 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.90 6.60Benzene11.0 ND ND ND ND ND 0.260 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 560 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.1 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.88 J ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/26/05 3/30/06 10/19/06 4/18/07 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/22/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/6/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/1/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16 10/3/16
Well No:SW-2
Arsenic 10 ND ND 2.9 J 1.70 JB 2.92 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA ND ND ND 0.51 J 0.47 J ND ND 0.42 J ND 0.76 J
Barium 700 ND ND 21.1 31.1 JB 14.3 J 30.5 JB 55.6 JB 27.5 JB 75.1 JB 48.0 40.0 31.0 NA 25.0 30.0 18.0 26.0 26.0 24.0 28.0 29.0 23.0 41Cadmium2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.3 J ND 1.2 0.63 J NA ND 0.21 J ND 0.44 J ND ND ND 0.036 J 0.080 J 0.18 JChromium10NDNDND6.09 JB 5.66 2.47 JB 2.82 JB 2.82 JB 11.6 B 1.1 J 1.8 J ND NA ND 2.5 B 1.4 B ND ND ND 0.53 J 0.84 J 0.86 J 0.58 JLead15NDNDND0.350 J ND 3.79 J 6.25 J 4.42 J 21.3 ND 1.0 J 1.0 J NA ND 0.45 J 0.93 J 2.9 0.44 J 0.21 J ND 0.52 J 0.41 J 0.46 J
Mercury 1 ND ND 0.15 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Selenium 20 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 4.2 J ND ND NA 1.90 3.00 1.10 0.43 J 0.42 J ND ND 0.92 J 0.68 J 0.97 J
Acetone 6000 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.6
Silver 20 ND ND ND ND ND 2.24 JB 3.73 JB 1.58 JB ND ND ND ND NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.012 J
Notes:
Results in parts per billion (ppb) B = Analyte found in associated field and/or laboratory blank.
ND - Not Detected above the laboratory method detection limit or practical quantitation limit (results prior to April 2007).
NA - Not analyzed for or not available
Values in boldface exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202 groundwater quality standards.
Results for sampling conducted prior to April 2007 as presented in previous GW reports prepared by Withers & Ravenel.
J = Estimated value above laboratory method detection limit and below SWSL or reporting limit.
Harnett County, North Carolina
Table 3 (Continued)
Phase I/II Tire Monofill Landfill (Active)
Historical Summary of Constituent Detections

11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
APPENDIX A

Groundwater Sampling Forms
EFM E IPMENT CALIBRATION FORM
(:.i:)i (-t i, Proiect#: C C -T/ ,&:_
INSTRUMENT: Y LT- S;-;
SERIAL NO.:
INSTRUMENT:(/l :,,t
SERIAL NO.:
Calibration Recorded Bv 1f{-
rri :ft L Lol#,\'zt/ r ?',-.,
Lot#('zr>a/
/.718 mS Lot# ?/li6(-r, Exp: {/ I 7
Lot# ;-6' ,€--lq.Exp'. f / t
Calibration Recorded Bv f2_
EFM E IPMENT CALIBRATION FORM
Project #:a(lGlient: ,// ori, i ,
INSTRUMENT:'57 3 s(
SERIAL NO.: o 9 6/ ffi-l d3 0(,39o
INSTRUMENT:
SERIAL NO.:
Calibration Recorded
/o"3 t(Lot# i:i t J44
"€;'aa't
Lour.66t-o,'3 : oJ st-/"t/o-3-tl
JO-J /I
Lot#(ity/q, Exp: g !- J/-,t'
Calibration Recorded
nd Water Sample Collection Record
ln'l'/' j
well ff Piezometer I
e. Length of Water Cotumn I I ? 'l
6-oy
f. Calculated Wett Votume (see back) t.6 U
Pumping Rate: /0 0 milminrrge Volume (@ _ well volumes) _ N/Aurbidity N/A NTUs
WATER LEVEL DATA:
a. Total Well Length
b. Water Table Depth
WELL PURGING DATA
4.<)
a. Purge Method
b. Acceptance Criteria
- Minimum Required
e. Acceptance criteria ss/fail
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
Have parameters
lf no or N/A -
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
from Top of Casing)
c. Casing Material PVC
d. Casing Diamete r 2"
LOW FLOW
fined (from workplan)
Client NAUTILUS
Project No: CENTRAL
Date: 10/ i /16
Time: Stan /74-{ "t/p.
Yes -
Hd
- Maximum Allowable
- Stabilization of 10 To
c. Field Testing Used: Make Model Serial Number
d. Field Testing Equ Calibration Documentation Found on Separate Form
removed
reached
below
Method: Peristaltic Pump
Comments
No N/ADNntrtrn
Signature
4.t e lat
Date _10t 3 t16
Client: NAUTILUS
Project No: CENTR
Site Location: CAMEF
Weather Conds: - fv,rurv*
Dale: _101 3 hG
Time: Start e?.Tl'l am/pm
Finish r.(77 am/pm
WATER LEVEL DATA:
a. Total Well Length
b. Water Table Depth
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method
Well d- Piezometer I?
e. Len'gtnof WaterColumn i /i. 3 -/ (a-o)
'rv\vu-f
nd Water Sample Collection Record
from Top of Casing)
/, /\)e' c. Casing Material PVC
!<d. Casing Diamete r 2" f. Calculated Well Votume (see back) 'd " 1
LOW FLOW
b. Acceptance Criteria
- Minimum Required
- Maximum Allowable
- Stabilization of
c. Field Testing
(from workplan)
rge Volume (@ _well volumes) _ N/A Pumping nate: / O-t mlimin.N/A NTUS-----aA o/o
Used: Make Model Serial NumberYSI 556 c,fl-t c t3 c_)'-
d. Field Testing E Calibration Documentation Found on Separate Form
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume
Has required
Have parameters
lf no or N/A -
SAMPLE COLLECTION:Method: Peristaltic Pump
Comments
Yes,.*frw
removed
reached
below
No N/Atrtrilnft D
Signature_Date_rol]lt6
C|ient NAUTILUS
Project No: CENTRAL
Date: 1Ot 9 nG
rime: start /d4d "r/p.
Volume
Removed ml
4344-
',14
t- - 6
WATER LEVEL DATA:
a. Total Well Length
b. Water Table Depth
WELL PURGING DATA
Comments
' fllw- 6
Water Sample Collection Record
from Top of Casing)Well M Piezometer fl
__\) c. Casing Material PVC e. Length of Water Column f g ,':1 0 1a-O)
f. Calculated Well Volume (see back) -2 . id. Casing Diamete r 2"
tOW FLOW
(from workplan)
Volume (@ _ well volumes) _ N/A Pumping Rate: ./0O r'r.'n- Maximum Allowable urbidity N/A NTUs
- Stabilization of 10%
c. Field Testing
6 tJ
a. Purge Method
b. Acceptance Criteria
- Minimum Required
d. Field Testing
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
Have parameters
lfnoorN/A-E below
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Used: Make Model Serial NumberYSI 556 nq 6t@19i3
Calibration Documentation Found on Separate Form
removed
reached
No N/Antrntrnt]
YesnilF
Method: Peristaltic Pump
Signature Date rcl 3 fi6
d. Field Testing E Calibration Documentation Found on Separate Form
e. Acceptance criteria Yes
E'E
Water Sample Collection Record
from Top of Casing)
c. Casing Material PVC
d. Casing Diamete r 2"
LOW FLOW
Weil/piezo ,O, A O". 1
well p Piezometer I
e. Length of Water Column / 5. I O-Ol
f. Calculated Well Volume (see back) ,'gg
WATER LEVEL DATA: (
a. Total Well Length ao,()q
b. Water Table Depth q' eO
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method
b. Acceptance Criteria
- Minimum Required
- Maximum Allowable
- Stabilization of
c. Field Testing
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
Have parameters
lf no or N/A -below
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Used: Make Model Serial NumberYSI 556 c1(t,Na7 o3
.-.--------_-
No N/Auf]nnnn
: NAUTILUS
No: CENTRAL
Site Location: CAMERON,
Weather Conds: !. n^ t 'l 6
Date:
-10/i
l'16
Time: Stari /9/o am/pm
Finish l/ ro am/pm
(from workplan)
Volume (@ _ well volumes) _ N/A Pumping Rate: //0 muminN/A NTUs
-------7A o/o
removed
reached
Method: Peristaltic Pump
Comments
Signature Da1tr-
-
fit J h6
f il" '2
C|ient NAUTILUS
Project No: CENTRAL
Site Location: CAMERON,
Date: 10t 3 ti6t'*" gpx r{Vj- "r/p,
WATER LEVEL DATA:
a. Total Well Length
b. Water Table Depth
a0
Water Sample Collection Record
from Top of Casing)
c, Casing Material PVC
d. Casing Diamete r 2"
LOW FLOW
Wett p Piezomeier I
e. Lerigthof WaterCotumn i7..5 0 @-b)
f. Calculated Well Volume (see back) A .i5";.5
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method
b. Acceptance Criteria
- Minimum Required
- Maximum Allowable
- Stabilization of pa
c. Field Testing
d. Field Testing
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
Have parameters
lf no or N/A -
(from workplan)
Volume (@ _ well volumes) _ N/A Pumping Rate: /5O ml/minN/A NTUs
-------7T%
Used: Make Model Serial NumberYSr 556 016 /Ga7o3
Calibration Documentation Found on Separate Form
removed
reached
No N/Anntrutrulized
in below.
Comments
"'tn.a
SAMPLE COLLECTION:Method: Peristaltic Pump
Signature Date _ 101? /16
Iient; NAUTILUS
No: CENTRAL
Site Location: CAMERON
Date: _1Ol 3 ho
Time: Start z3 Ji am/pm
Finish lfro am/pm
INATIRE. PERMIT#4304
Collector(s) rirlr i,'*719,,,tf
WATER LEVEL DATA:
a. Total Well Length
b. Water Table Depth
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method
b. Acceptance Criteria
- Minimum Required
- Maximum Allowable
- Stabilization of par
c. Field Testing
d. Field Testing
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume
Has required
Have parameters
lf no or N/A -
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Comments
nd Water Sample Collection Record
from Top of Casing)
c. Casing Material PVC
d. Casing Diamete r 2"
LOW FLOW
'o' alu- )
Well M Piezometer fl
e. Length of Water Column i I , /3 6-Oy
f. Calculated Well Volume (see back) 1,8/
Pumping Rate: /dt, ml/min.
Serial Number
;lo
rge Volume (@ _ well volumes) _ N/Aurbidity N/A NTUs
(from workplan)
1A o/"
Used: Make ModelYSt 556_ egt,t,hioj
t Calibration Documentation Found on Separate Form
removed
reached
below
Yesnad
No N/Ailntrtrtrn
Peristaltiq Pump
Signature Qr:4 ,
: NAUTILUS
No: CENTRAL
Site Location: CAMERON,
Weather 6en6s' -l'lf-,--E
Date:
-10/r?
/16
Time: Start ./.1 J7 am/pmTIRE. PERM M3O4
WATER LEVEL DATA:
a. Total Well Length
b. Water Table Depth
WELL PURGING DATA
JCJ
4.t
a. Purge Method
b. Acceptance Criteria
- Minimum Required
- Maximum
- Stabilization of pa
Turbidity N/A NTUSneters 10 o/o
c. Field Testing Used: Make Model
d. Field Testing Calibration Documentation Found on Separate Form
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume removed
Has required been reached
Have parameters
lf no or N/A -below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION:Method: Peristaltic Pump
Comments
nd Water Sample Collection Record
from Top of Casing)
c. Casing Material PVC
d. Casing Diamete t 2"
LOW FLOW
fi l"'. ta'
Well M Piezometer I
e. Length of Water Column t'9 't 5 1a-O1
f. Calculated Well Volume (see back) ? 't F
Serial Number
(from workplan)
Volume (@ _ well volumes) _ N/A Pumping aate:JOO mt/min.
Yes No N/AatrtrafrrVtrtr
Signature Date_10/3/16
NATIRE. PERMIT#4304
Date: _10/ ! /16
Time: Start /l qs am/pm
Finish ^ra' am/Pm
Client: NAUTILUS
Project No: CENTRAL
Site Location: CAMERON,
Weather Conds: {', *^. r '"1'J'l
RCRA METALS
Water Sample Collection Record
from Top of Casing)
c. Casing Material PVC
d. Casing Diamete r 2"
LOW FLOW
?1.'- I
Well E Piezometer I
e. Length of Water Column / 4. 5 { 6-o1
f. Calculated Well Volume (see back) d 37
WATER LEVEL DATA:
a. Total Well Length
b. Water Table Depth J. I
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method
b. Acceptance Criteria
- Minimum Required
- Maximum Allowable
- Stabilization of par
c. Field Testing
d. Field Testing
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
Have parameters
lf no or N/A -
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Comments
ilv'a
(from workplan)
Volume (@ _well volumes) _ N/A Pumping Rate: /'ff mliminN/A NTUS---------1d o/o
Make
Calibration Documentation Found on Separate Form
i a,J
removed
reached
below.
Method: Peristaltic Pump
Yes No N/AannfrnrEntr
Signature Date 1ot3 t16

11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
APPENDIX B

Laboratory Reports
And
Chain-of-Custody Records

Page 1 of 59
Page 2 of 59
Page 3 of 59
Page 4 of 59
Page 5 of 59
Page 24 of 59
Page 25 of 59
Page 26 of 59
Page 27 of 59
Page 28 of 59
Page 29 of 59
Page 30 of 59
Page 31 of 59
Page 32 of 59
Page 33 of 59
Page 34 of 59
Page 35 of 59
Page 36 of 59
Page 37 of 59
Page 38 of 59
Page 39 of 59
Page 40 of 59
Page 41 of 59
Page 42 of 59
Page 43 of 59
Page 44 of 59
Page 45 of 59
Page 46 of 59
Page 47 of 59
Page 48 of 59
Page 49 of 59
Page 50 of 59
Page 51 of 59
Page 52 of 59
Page 53 of 59
Page 54 of 59
Page 55 of 59
Page 56 of 59
Page 57 of 59
Page 58 of 59
Page 59 of 59