IH2954_20230809_DRAFT Phase II ESA

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
EBI Project No. 1123003753
Report Date: August 9, 2023
Site Inspection Date: August 1, 2023
Prepared for:
Orange Community Management, LLC
7 Cottontail Road
Melville, NY 11747
Prepared by:
21 B StreetBurlington, MA 01803ebiconsulting.com
DRA
F
T
August 9, 2023
Mr. Mike Deford
Orange Community Management, LLC
7 Cottontail Road
Melville, NY 11747
Subject: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West, Morganton, North Carolina 28655
EBI Project No. 1123003753
Dear Mr. Deford:
Attached please find our Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (the report) for the above-mentioned asset
(the Subject Property). During the survey and research, our surveyor spoke with agents representing the
Subject Property, or agents of the owner, and reviewed the Subject Property and its history. The report was
completed according to the terms and conditions authorized by you, the Client. This report has been
completed in conformance with the ASTM Standard E1527-21 and the Standard Terms and Conditions for
Third Party Due Diligence Services between Orange Community Management, LLC and EnviroBusiness, Inc.
signed July 20, 2023.
The purpose of this report is to acquire environmental information, observe the general condition and
maintenance status of the Subject Property, to suggest remediation and/or maintenance practices
considered customary for the Subject Property to continue in its current operation, compared to properties
of similar age and condition, and to identify recognized environmental conditions in connection with the
Subject Property described in this report.
This report was performed utilizing methods and procedures consistent with established commercial
practices and in conformance with industry standards. The suggestions represent EBI's opinion based on
written, graphic or verbal information, the property condition and data available to us at the time of the
survey. Factual information regarding operations, conditions or data provided by the Client, occupants,
owner or their representative has been assumed to be correct and complete.
There are no intended or unintended third party beneficiaries to this report, except as expressly stated
herein.
EBI is an independent contractor, not an employee of either the issuer or the borrower, and its
compensation was not based on the findings or recommendations made in the report or on the closing of any
business transaction.
21 B Street
Burlington, MA 01803
ebiconsulting.com
DRA
F
T
We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of
Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312 and we have the specific qualifications
based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the
Subject Property. We have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the
standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312.
Thank you very much for the opportunity to provide environmental consulting services to Orange
Community Management, LLC. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do
not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Respectfully submitted,
EBI Consulting
Signature for Anya Chase Signature for Jon Hickey
Anya Chase / Project Engineer Jon Hickey / Program Manager
[e-mail]
917.804.5470
21 B Street
Burlington, MA 01803
ebiconsulting.com
DRA
F
T
Environmental Assessment Summary
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West Site Size: 5.35 acres
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West Property Type: Manufactured Home Complex
Morganton, North Carolina, 28655 Building Size: 233,046 square feet
Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 1752-70-4512
The following Environmental Assessment Summary Table presents our findings, conclusions and recommended actions for the Subject Property. Refer
to Section 1.0 for full discussions of EBI’s findings, opinions, conclusions and recommended actions.
Report Section
No
Further
Action
REC HREC CREC De
Minimis BER Other Recommended Action Estimated
Cost
2.4 Adjoining Properties 
4.1 Standard Environmental
Records

EBI recommends that the Subject Property
ownership should seek an approved site
closure and removal from the Priority List
through the state's voluntary cleanup
program.
TBD based on
NCDEQ
requirements
4.1.5 Vapor Migration 
4.2.1 Past Uses of Subject Property 
4.2.2 Past Uses of Adjoining and
Surrounding Properties 
5.2.1 Hazardous Substances and
Petroleum Products 
5.2.2 Waste Generation, Storage,
and Disposal 
Environmental Assessment Summary
DRA
F
T
Report Section
No
Further
Action
REC HREC CREC De
Minimis BER Other Recommended Action Estimated
Cost
5.2.3 Underground Storage Tanks
(USTs) & Aboveground
Storage Tanks (ASTs)

5.2.4 Oil-Containing Equipment
and Polychlorinated
Biphenyls (PCBS)

5.3 Additional Site Conditions 
7.1 Asbestos-Containing
Material (ACM)
7.2 Radon 
7.3 Lead-Based Paint (LBP)
7.4 Lead in Drinking Water 
Environmental Assessment Summary
DRA
F
T
Table of Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.0
Findings, Opinions and Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.1
Data Gaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.1.1
Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.2
Subject Property Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32.0
Ownership and Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32.1
Subject Property Improvements and Current Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32.2
Municipal Services & Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42.3
Adjoining Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42.4
Physical Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52.5
User Provided Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63.0
Records Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74.0
Standard Environmental Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74.1
Orphans Listings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84.1.1
Subject Property Listings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84.1.2
Adjoining and Surrounding Property Listings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104.1.3
Local Regulatory Agency Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104.1.4
Vapor Migration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114.1.5
Historical Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114.2
Past Uses of Subject Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124.2.1
Past Uses of Adjoining and Surrounding Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134.2.2
Recorded Land Title Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144.2.3
Property Tax Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144.2.4
Environmental Liens and Activity and Use Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154.2.5
Other Historical Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154.2.6
Subject Property Reconnaissance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165.0
Methodology and Limiting Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165.1
Site Reconnaissance Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165.2
Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175.2.1
Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products (Identified Uses). . . . . . . . . . 175.2.1.1
Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products (Unidentified Uses). . . . . . . . 175.2.1.2
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
DRA
F
T
Unidentified Substances Containers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175.2.1.3
Waste Generation, Storage, and Disposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175.2.2
Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) & Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) . . . . . . . . . . 185.2.3
Existing Storage Tanks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185.2.3.1
Former Storage Tanks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185.2.3.2
Oil-Containing Equipment and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185.2.4
Additional Site Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195.3
Interior Drains, Trenches, or Sumps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195.3.1
Interior Stains or Corrosion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195.3.2
Unusual Odors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195.3.3
Interior Pools of Liquid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195.3.4
Stained Soil or Pavement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195.3.5
Stressed Vegetation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195.3.6
Indications of Solid Waste Disposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195.3.7
Exterior Pits, Ponds or Lagoons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195.3.8
Wastewater or Stormwater Discharge/Disposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205.3.9
Oil-Water Separators or Clarifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205.3.10
Septic Systems or Cesspools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205.3.11
Wells (Drinking Water Wells, Monitoring Wells, Agricultural/Irrigation Wells, or
Process Water Wells) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
5.3.12
Petroleum or Natural Gas Pipelines/Easements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205.3.13
Interviews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216.0
Conditions Outside the Scope of ASTM Practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227.0
Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227.1
Radon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227.2
Lead-Based Paint (LBP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237.3
Lead in Drinking Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237.4
Purpose And Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248.0
Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248.1
Scope-of-Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248.2
Assumptions, Limitations and Exceptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258.3
Special Terms and Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 278.4
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289.0
Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2910.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
DRA
F
T
Appendix A - Photographs
Appendix B - Figures
Appendix C - Pre-Survey Questionnaire and Other Relevant Documentation
Appendix D - Professional Qualifications
Appendix E - Regulatory Database Report
Appendix F - Historical Documentation
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
DRA
F
T
1.0 Introduction
At the request of Orange Community Management, LLC, EBI has performed a Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment (ESA) of the property located at 2353 U.S. Highway 70 West in Morganton, North Carolina,
herein referred to as the Subject Property. The main objective of this ESA was to identify recognized
environmental conditions in connection with the Subject Property, defined in ASTM Practice E1527-21 as
(1) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the Subject Property due to a
release to the environment; (2) the likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or
at the Subject Property due to a release or likely release to the environment; or (3) the presence of
hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the Subject Property under conditions that pose a
material threat of a future release to the environment. This ESA also includes a preliminary evaluation of
certain potential environmental conditions that are outside the scope of ASTM Practice E1527-21.
1.1 Findings, Opinions and Conclusions
EBI has performed this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and
limitations of ASTM Standard E1527-21 of the property located at 2353 U.S. Highway 70 West in
Morganton, North Carolina. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described inSection 8.0
of this report.
This assessment has identified no evidence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs)in connection with
the Subject Property, except for the following:
• The Subject Property, identified as "US 70 Drum Dump", is listed on the NCDEQ's Division of
Waste Management's Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites Priority List. In July 1986, a pile of 55-gallon
drums and other trash was discovered at the bottom of an embankment on the northeastern
portion of the Subject Property, on the south side of US Highway 70. The drums were reportedly
rusted and contained solid and liquid waste material. Sampling of waste, soil, and groundwater
(from a nearby domestic well) showed that contaminant concentrations did not exceed NCDEQ
background levels. In March 1987, all drums and waste materials were removed. A Site
Investigation Report prepared by the North Carolina Solid and Hazardous Waste Management
Branch, dated August 1987, concluded that the direct contact hazard at the site had been
eliminated, and no evidence of surface water or groundwater contamination was identified. It was
suggested that follow-up work at the site could include soil sampling to ensure that no residual
contaminants remain. Between 1993 and 2022, letters were sent annually to the Subject Property
owners, notifying them that the site remains on the NCDEQ's Division of Waste Management's
Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites Priority List. This means that steps have not been taken to achieve
an approved site closure. The most recent letter, dated May 20, 2022, indicates that any party can
complete an approved environmental cleanup by participating in the state's voluntary cleanup
program under an administrative agreement with the NCDEQ. Based upon the absence of
regulatory closure, the Subject Property's listing on the Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites Priority
List is currently considered a recognized environmental condition (REC).
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
1
DRA
F
T
This assessment has identified no evidence of historical recognized environmental conditions (HRECs), controlled
recognized environmental conditions (CRECs), de minimis conditions, or considerations outside the scope of ASTM
Practice E 1527-21 in connection with the Subject Property.
1.1.1 Data Gaps
Any data gaps identified herein, as defined by ASTM Practice E1527-21 § 3.2.19 and 3.2.78, are not
considered to have significantly affected the ability to identify recognized environmental conditions in
connection with the Subject Property and do not alter the conclusions of this report.
1.2 Recommendations
Based upon the findings of this investigation, EBI offers the following:
• EBI recommends that the Subject Property ownership should seek an approved site closure and
removal from the Priority List through the state's voluntary cleanup program. Estimated Cost: TBD
based on NCDEQ requirements.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
2
DRA
F
T
2.0 Subject Property Description
2.1 Ownership and Location
Figure 1 depicts the location of the Subject Property on a street map of Morganton, North Carolina.Figure 2
depicts the location of the Subject Property on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5 Minute
Topographic Quadrangle.Figure 3 depicts the configuration of the Subject Property and adjoining
properties.
Item Subject Property Description
Address 2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
County Burke
Relative Location 770 feet east of the intersection of Dysartsville Road and U.S. Highway 70 West
Current Owner Betty D Dellinger
Primary Land Use Manufactured Home Complex
Current
Occupant(s)
Various residential tenant
Number of Parcels 1
Tax ID / Parcel #(s)1752-70-4512
Parcel
Configuration
Irregular-shaped
Subject Property
Acreage
5.35
2.2 Subject Property Improvements and Current Use
The Subject Property is currently improved with a manufactured home complex, including 19 manufactured
home pad sites. The pad sites are owned by the Subject Property and are leased to the individual owners of
the manufactured home units. For the purpose of this assessment, privately owned mobile home units are
not considered a part of the asset, and interior assessment of the manufactured home units was not
conducted. Areas of the Subject Property surrounding the manufactured home units include
an asphalt-paved drive bisecting the central portion of the Subject Property from north to south, and
gravel-paved driveways at each manufactured home pad site. Landscaping is present between the buildings,
and unimproved wooded land is present on the northern portion of the property and along property
boundaries. The existing manufactured home complex was developed in 1986.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
3
DRA
F
T
Subject Property Improvements
Address Floors Basement Area (SF) DOC DOR
Lot Size
(Acres)
2353 US-70: (19) Mobile
Homes
1 No 233,046 1986 N/A 5.35
SF: Square Feet
DOC: Date of Construction
DOR: Date of Renovation
Please refer to Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products for discussion regarding hazardous
substances and petroleum products at the Subject Property.
2.3 Municipal Services & Utilities
The Subject Property is serviced by the following municipal services and utilities:
Utility Provider/Source
Potable Water Supply Brentwood Water Corporation
Sewage Disposal System On-site septic systems
Electrical Service Duke Energy
Natural Gas Service Not provided
Oil Service Not provided
Heating/Cooling Systems Electric baseboard heating
Emergency Power Not provided
2.4 Adjoining Properties
Property use in the vicinity of the Subject Property is primarily characterized by residential and retail/
commercial development, as well as undeveloped, wooded land.
Direction Description
North The Subject Property is bound to the north by U.S. Highway 70 West, beyond which is
undeveloped wooded land.
South The Subject Property is bound to the south by single-family residential development.
East The Subject Property is bound to the east undeveloped wooded land, beyond which is
single-family residential development.
West The Subject Property is bound to the northwest by a Dollar General store (2379 U.S.
Highway 70 West), and to the west by undeveloped wooded land and single-family,
residential development.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
4
DRA
F
T
No visual evidence of adverse environmental conditions was observed during the survey of the adjoining
properties.
2.5 Physical Setting
Topography
Setting Description
Elevation 1,306 to 1,343 feet above mean sea level (msl)
General Topography Undulating
Slope Gently to moderately sloping
General Slope of
Surrounding Area
Northeast
Geology and Soils
Setting Description
Bedrock No bedrock outcroppings observed.
Geologic Formation Piedmont
Physiographic
Province
Information concerning the geology of the Subject Property was obtained from the
USGS National Water Summary, North Carolina region (1984). The Subject Property
is located within the Piedmont physiographic province, which is characterized by
gently rolling terrain and slow-flowing streams and is underlain by hard crystalline
and igneous rocks that are covered nearly everywhere by a clayey or sandy regolith
consisting of weathered parent rock material and alluvium.
Soil Classification/
Type
Fairview sandy clay loam (FaB2), 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded -
moderately high to high permeable, saprolite residuum weathered from granite and
gneiss and/or saprolite residuum weathered from schist to a depth of 79 inches per
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey (WSS).
Hydrogeology and Hydrology
Setting Description
Nearest Body of
Water/Distance
Unnamed pond / 0.18 miles east of the Subject Property
Estimated Depth to
Groundwater
Groundwater depths and flow gradients are best evaluated by a subsurface
investigation involving the installation of at least three groundwater monitoring wells
and precise measurements of hydrostatic pressure. Monitoring wells were not
observed on the Subject Property.
Anticipated
Groundwater Flow
Direction
Northeast
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
5
DRA
F
T
3.0 User Provided Information
The following section summarizes information provided by Orange Community Management, LLC with
regard to this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. Additionally, a User Questionnaire was forwarded to
the designated Client contact. The User Questionnaire has not been completed and returned to our offices.
The information requested in the User Questionnaire is intended to assist in gathering information that may
be material to identifying recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Subject Property.
Relevant documentation referenced below is presented in the Pre-Survey Questionnaire and Other
Relevant Documentation Appendix.
Type of Information User Provided
Issue
Identified Comments
Title Records No NA
Environmental Liens or
Activity and Use
Limitations
No NA
Specialized Knowledge No NA
Commonly Known or
Reasonably
Ascertainable
Information
No NA
Valuation Reduction for
Environmental Issues
No NA
Previous Reports No NA
User Provided
Documentation
Yes No The User provided contact information for the
Subject Property owner, manager and/or
occupants.
Reason for Performing
the Phase I
Yes No In connection with a real estate transaction.
ASTM User
Questionnaire
No NA
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
6
DRA
F
T
4.0 Records Review
4.1 Standard Environmental Records
A review of standard environmental databases maintained by Federal, state, and tribal offices was
completed through Environmental Data Resources, LLC (EDR). The databases were searched for properties
with reported environmental conditions located within approximate minimum search distances as specified
by ASTM Standard E1527-21, by using geocoding information that identified the coordinates of the
properties in the databases or by checking the street addresses of practically reviewable non-geocoded
“orphan” properties within the same zip code. The database report is presented in the Regulatory Database
Report Appendix.
It should be noted that plotted locations of listed sites are not always accurate. With regard to listings that
are determined or suspected to be inaccurate, based on information from other sources such as direct
observation or consultation with individuals familiar with the property, EBI uses the best available data
when evaluating the location of listed sites discussed below.
The following table provides a summary of the findings of the environmental database report. Specific
properties identified within the database report are further discussed in the sections below. Properties that
are identified within the database report that are not discussed further in the sections below are not
considered to be a concern to the Subject Property based on one or more of the following rationale(s):
absence of reported releases, current regulatory status, distance, presumed hydrogeologic gradient and/or
nature/extent of contamination.
Regulatory Report Summary
Database
Search
Radius
Target
Property
Within
0.12mi
0.12mi to
0.25mi
0.25mi to
0.50mi
0.50mi to
1.00mi Total
NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 0 0
Delisted
NPL
1.000 0 0 0 0 0 0
SEMS 0.500 0 0 0 0 NR 0
SEMS-ARC
HIVE
0.500 0 0 0 0 NR 0
CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 0 0
RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0 0 0 0 NR 0
RCRA-LQG 0.250 0 0 0 NR NR 0
RCRA-SQG 0.250 0 0 0 NR NR 0
RCRA-VSQ
G
0.250 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
7
DRA
F
T
Database
Search
Radius
Target
Property
Within
0.12mi
0.12mi to
0.25mi
0.25mi to
0.50mi
0.50mi to
1.00mi Total
US ENG
CONTROLS
0.500 0 0 0 0 NR 0
US INST
CONTROLS
0.500 0 0 0 0 NR 0
ERNS 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0
NC HSDS 1.000 0 1 0 0 0 1
SHWS 1.000 0 1 0 0 0 1
SWF/LF 0.500 0 0 0 0 NR 0
LUST 0.500 0 0 0 0 NR 0
LAST 0.500 0 0 0 0 NR 0
UST 0.250 0 0 0 NR NR 0
AST 0.250 0 0 0 NR NR 0
INST
CONTROL
0.500 0 0 0 0 NR 0
VCP 0.500 0 0 0 0 NR 0
BROWNFIE
LDS
0.500 0 0 0 0 NR 0
US
BROWNFIE
LDS
0.500 0 0 0 0 NR 0
SWRCY 0.500 0 0 0 0 NR 0
US CDL 0 1 NR NR NR NR 1
SPILLS 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0
IMD 0.500 0 0 0 1 NR 1
4.1.1 Orphans Listings
The database report identified six “orphan sites.” Orphan sites are those facilities that could not be
automatically mapped or geocoded due to inadequate location information. EBI attempted to locate these
facilities via vehicular reconnaissance and interviews with personnel familiar with the area. Based on this
research, EBI did not identify listed orphan sites within the approximate minimum search distances.
4.1.2 Subject Property Listings
The Subject Property listings are discussed in the table below:
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
8
DRA
F
T
Subject Property Summary
Site Name Address Database Elevation (ft) Dist. (ft) / Dir. Comments
2353 WEST US
HIGHWAY 70 5
2353 WEST US
HIGHWAY 70 5,
MORGANTON,
NC
US CDL 1338 Subject Property See discussion
below.
US 70 DRUM
DUMP
Not Provided NC HSDS,
SHWS
1338 Subject Property See discussion
below.
United States Clandestine Drug Labs (US CDL) Database Listing:
The Subject Property address is listed on the Clandestine Drug Labs (US CDL) database, which
includes a listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice maintains a listing of
addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items
that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. The database listing
reports a seizure date of September 20, 2007. No further information was provided for the listing. Based
upon the nature of the database and the information provided, this database listing is considered unlikely to
represent an environmental concern to the Subject Property.
North Carolina Hazardous Substance Disposal Sites (NC HSDS) and State Hazardous Waste Sites (SHWS)
Database Listings:
A site identified as "US 70 Drum Dump" is listed on the NC HSDS and SHWS databases, and is plotted in the
EDR database report on the northern portion of the Subject Property, extending to areas immediately north
and east of the Subject Property. The database listings provide limited information beyond coordinates and
identification numbers.
EBI reviewed available records pertaining to the US 70 Drum Dump site, obtained from the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) online portal (https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/). Multiple
documents were identified dating between August 1987 and May 2022. A Site Investigation Report, dated
August 1987, was conducted by the North Carolina Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch,
Environmental Health Section, CERCLA Unit. The report indicated that on July 2, 1986, a pile of 55-gallon
drums and other trash was discovered at the bottom of an embankment on the northeastern portion of the
Subject Property, on the south side of US Highway 70. The drums were reportedly rusted and contained
solid and liquid waste material that had spilled onto the ground beneath the pile. The source of the drums
was not identified at the time of this assessment. Preliminary samples of waste, soil, and groundwater (from
nearby domestic wells) were collected on July 2, 1986 and submitted for laboratory analysis. Sample results
showed chlorobenzene, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, and methenamine at concentrations above detection
limits in soil and waste; however, it was noted that methenamine was not listed as a CERCLA hazardous
substance at the time of this assessment. No groundwater contaminants were identified, and no water was
observed within the culvert at the time of the assessment. On March 9, 1987, a total of fifty-five (55)
55-gallon drums of solid waste and four (4) 55-gallon drums of liquid waste were staged for removal from
the site. Between March 13 and 14, 1987, additional waste and soil samples were collected. Measurable
concentrations of contaminants were identified in the waste samples; however, concentrations were below
state background levels. Subsequently, the drums were overpacked in larger drums and removed from the
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
9
DRA
F
T
site. Soil removal was deemed unnecessary at the time. The report concluded that the direct contact hazard
at the site had been eliminated, and no evidence of surface water or groundwater contamination was
identified. It was suggested that follow-up work at the site could include soil sampling to ensure that no
residual contaminants remain.
Between 1993 and 2022, letters were sent annually to the Subject Property owners, notifying them that the
site remains on the NCDEQ's Division of Waste Management's Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites Priority List.
This means that steps have not been taken to achieve an approved site closure. The most recent letter, dated
May 20, 2022, indicates that any party can complete an approved environmental cleanup by participating in
the state's voluntary cleanup program under an administrative agreement with the NCDEQ. EBI
recommends the pursuit of an approved site closure and removal from the Priority List through the state's
voluntary cleanup program. Based upon the length of time since the initial sampling was conducted,
additional site investigation may be required. Copies of the Site Investigation Report and other relevant
documents are presented in the appendices.
4.1.3 Adjoining and Surrounding Property Listings
Notable adjoining and/or surrounding properties identified within the ASTM-specified radii are discussed
below.
Surrounding Properties Summary
Site Name Database Address Dist. (ft) / Dir.
Elevation
(ft) Comments
PRESNELL GEN.
MERCH.-1000
GAL
IMD 2668 US 70
WEST, MARION,
NC,
2233.00/NW 1296.0 See discussion
below.
The site located at 2668 U.S. Highway 70 West is listed on the Incident Management Database (IMD) for a
groundwater and/or soil contamination incident. Reportedly, a release of gasoline/diesel was identified
during the removal of a 1,000-gallon underground storage tank (UST) in 1993. No groundwater
contamination was identified. The site was closed November 3, 1993. Based on the regulatory status and
separating distance relative to the Subject Property, it is considered unlikely that conditions associated with
the identified listing represents an environmental concern to the Subject Property.
The above-listed and remaining identified surrounding Federal, State and Tribal Agency Database listings
are not considered an environmental concern to the Subject Property based on one or more of the following
rationale: absence of reported releases, regulatory status, presumed hydrogeologic gradient relative to the
Subject Property and/or nature/extent of contamination.
4.1.4 Local Regulatory Agency Records
Local municipal offices consulted during the completion of this assessment included the following:
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
10
DRA
F
T
Agency
Available Files
Reviewed
Issue
Identified Comments
Burke County Building
Department
NA NA FOIA response pending
Burke County Fire Department NA NA FOIA response pending
4.1.5 Vapor Migration
EBI conducted a vapor migration screening survey of the Subject Property. EBI’s site observations and
review of the environmental database report (cited in the Standard Environmental Records Section) did not
identify any conditions on the Subject Property or on adjoining properties that would indicate a REC relative
to vapor migration exists at the Subject Property.
This vapor migration screening was conducted in accordance with ASTM E1527-21 and is not intended to
satisfy the requirements of ASTM E2600-22. The scope of this screening was limited to visual observations
and review of the environmental database report and did not include the collection and laboratory analysis
of air samples to confirm the presence of airborne contaminants by vapor intrusion.
4.2 Historical Use
EBI attempted to determine the history of the Subject Property dating back to 1940 or first developed
use. EBI attempted to determine the history of the Subject Property dating back to 1940 or first developed
use. It should be noted that a data failure occurred per Section 8.3.6 of ASTM Standard E1527-21.
Specifically, EBI could not identify historic resources at five-year intervals dating back to first developed use.
However, based on the information obtained, which indicated the use of the Subject Property remained the
same during these intervals, this data failure is not considered a significant data gap and is unlikely to affect
the conclusions of this report.
The following table summarizes the historical records that were available for review for the Subject
Property, adjoining properties, and surrounding properties.
Year
Aerial
Photographs
Historical
Topographic
Maps
Fire Insurance
Maps City Directories Other
Not Available 
Pre-1940's 1892 1905
1940's 1947
1950's 1950
1960's 1961
1964
1962
1970's 1976
1980's 1984
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
11
DRA
F
T
Year
Aerial
Photographs
Historical
Topographic
Maps
Fire Insurance
Maps City Directories Other
1990's 1993
1998
1994
1995
1992
1995
2000's 2006
2009
2000
2005
2010's 2012
2016
2013
2016
2019
2010
2014
2017
2020's 2020 2020
4.2.1 Past Uses of Subject Property
Based on User provided information and a review of available records including aerial photographs,
topographic maps, city directories, and fire insurance maps, the previous uses of the Subject Property are
described in the tables below in intervals where meaningful property changes were noted.
Maps, Aerial Photographs, Other Records
Date Description Historical Source
1892 - 1905 The Subject Property appears to be undeveloped with no notable
structures or features.
Topographic Maps
1947 - 1950 The Subject Property appears to be undeveloped wooded land with
no notable structures or features.
Aerial Photographs
1961 - 1962 The north side of the Subject Property is undeveloped wooded
land. The remaining portions of the property appear to be
undeveloped land.
Aerial Photographs
Topographic Maps
1964 A rectangular-shaped structure is present on the northwest side of
the Subject Property, indicative of residential development. The
north side of the Subject Property is undeveloped wooded land. The
remaining portions of the property appear to be undeveloped land.
Aerial Photographs
Topographic Maps
Property Tax Files
1976 The rectangular-shaped structure on the northwest side of the
property is no longer present. A small square-shaped structure is
visible on the southeast side of the Subject Property, likely residential
in nature.
Aerial Photographs
1984 A rectangular-shaped structure is present on the central portion of
the Subject Property, presumably a mobile home development. The
square structure remains on the southeast side of the property.
Aerial Photographs
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
12
DRA
F
T
Date Description Historical Source
1993 The Subject Property is developed with eight mobile home
residences. The existing roadway is present through the central
portion of the property running north to south providing access from
U.S. Highway 70 West to the mobile home units. Undeveloped,
cleared land is visible on the southern portion of the property. The
northeast side of the property remains undeveloped and wooded.
Aerial Photographs
1994 - 1995 Topographic maps depict the property as developed with a roadway
through the central portion of the property running north to south.
The property is shaded, suggesting the site is developed with the
existing manufactured home complex.
Topographic Maps
1998 - Present Supplemental manufactured home structures are present
throughout the Subject Property extending over the southern
portion of the property. The roadway remains on the central portion
of the property. Undeveloped wooded land remains on the northeast
side of the property.
Aerial Photographs
Topographic Maps
City Directories
Year Subject Property Listings
1992 Residential listings.
1995 Address not listed.
2000 - 2020 Residential listings.
4.2.2 Past Uses of Adjoining and Surrounding Properties
Based on a review of available records including aerial photographs, topographic maps, city directories, and
fire insurance maps, the previous uses of the adjoining and surrounding properties are described in the
tables below.
Maps, Aerial Photographs, Other Records
Date Description Historical Source
1892 Adjoining properties consist of undeveloped land with no notable
structures or features with the exception of a stream to the east.
Surrounding properties consist of undeveloped land with no notable
structures or features.
Topographic Maps
1905 Adjoining properties consist of undeveloped land with no notable
structures or features with the exception of a stream to the east.
Surrounding properties consist of undeveloped land with roadways
present to the south and east.
Topographic Maps
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
13
DRA
F
T
Date Description Historical Source
1947 - 1950 Adjoining properties consist of undeveloped wooded land. U.S.
Highway 70 West is present to the north of the Subject Property,
running east to west. Surrounding properties beyond appear to be
undeveloped wooded and/or agricultural land.
Aerial Photographs
1961 - Present Adjoining properties consist of U.S. Highway 70 West and
undeveloped wooded land to the north and various single-family
residential developments to the south, east, and west. Surrounding
properties consist of residential development and undeveloped
wooded land.
Aerial Photographs
Topographic Maps
City Directories
Year Adjoining and Surrounding Property Listings
1992 Residential listings
1995 Residential and business listings including, Rick Wilson Auto Repair.
2000 - 2020 Residential listings
4.2.3 Recorded Land Title Records
Land title records provide information on previous ownership of a property. Typically, deeds signifying
transfer of a land parcel are recorded in county files and can be researched to determine the identity of past
owners. A “chain of title” is a continuous record of ownership for a specific parcel. A 50-year chain of title
search was not included in the scope of work for this assessment.
4.2.4 Property Tax Records
The property card for the Subject Property was obtained from the Burke County Assessor's Office online
records. The property card identifies the current owner as Betty D Dellinger, which acquired the Subject
Property in 2005. A partial listing of the former Subject Property owners and property transfer dates is
presented below.
Property Tax Records
Transfer
Date
Issues
Noted Owner
1/1/1900 No Jeanne C Baker/ Johnny Morgan Baker
2/5/1986 No Judy W Crawley/ James W Crawley
3/1/1990 No Gary Alton ET Lane
9/27/2005 No Betty D Dellinger
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
14
DRA
F
T
4.2.5 Environmental Liens and Activity and Use Limitations
A search for Environmental Liens and Activity and Use Limitations was not included in the scope of this
assessment.
4.2.6 Other Historical Records
No other historical records were researched as part of this assessment. Refer to Section 6.0 for a discussion
of interviews conducted as part of this assessment.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
15
DRA
F
T
5.0 Subject Property Reconnaissance
The Subject Property reconnaissance was conducted by Mrs. Anya Chase, EBI Field Assessor, on August 1,
2023. Mrs. Chase was unaccompanied at the time of the site reconnaissance.
5.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions
The Subject Property reconnaissance consisted of visual and/or physical observations of the Subject
Property and improvements, adjoining properties as viewed from the Subject Property boundaries, and the
surrounding area based on visual observations made from adjacent public thoroughfares. Unimproved
portions of the Subject Property were observed along the perimeter and in a general grid pattern in safely
accessible areas. Building exteriors were observed along the perimeter from the ground, unless described
otherwise. Building interiors were observed as they were made safely accessible, unless described
otherwise.
Weather Sunny
Temperature 85°F
Areas Observed Exterior areas
Inaccessible Areas Residential unit interiors
Reason for Exclusion of
Inaccessible Areas
Objections from owners of residential units
As previously noted in Section 2.2, for the purpose of this assessment, privately owned mobile home units
are not considered a part of the asset, and interior assessment of the manufactured home units was not
conducted. There were no significant portions of the Subject Property that were inaccessible or excluded
from this survey.
5.2 Site Reconnaissance Findings
The following is a summary of visual and/or physical observations of the Subject Property on the day of the
site visit. Photographs of pertinent Subject Property features are presented in the PHOTOGRAPHS
Appendix.
Feature or Condition
Identified on Subject
Property Concern Identified
Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products No NA
Waste Generation, Storage, and Disposal No NA
Underground Storage Tanks & Aboveground Storage Tanks No NA
Oil-Containing Equipment and Polychlorinated Biphenyls
(PCBs)
No NA
Interior Drains, Trenches, or Sumps No NA
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
16
DRA
F
T
Feature or Condition
Identified on Subject
Property Concern Identified
Interior Stains or Corrosion No NA
Unusual Odors No NA
Stained Soil or Pavement No NA
Stressed Vegetation No NA
Indications of Solid Waste Disposal No NA
Exterior Pits, Ponds, or Lagoons No NA
Wastewater or Stormwater Discharge/Disposal Yes No
Oil-Water Separators or Clarifiers No NA
Septic Systems or Cesspools Yes No
Wells (Drinking Water Wells, Monitoring Wells,
Agricultural/Irrigation Wells, or Process Water Wells)
No NA
Petroleum or Natural Gas Pipelines/Easements No NA
5.2.1 Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products
5.2.1.1 Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products (Identified Uses)
No notable hazardous substances or petroleum products in connection with identified uses were observed
at the Subject Property.
EBI did not identify evidence of significant leaks, spills, or the improper handling of petroleum or hazardous
substances that might impact the environmental condition of the Subject Property.
5.2.1.2 Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products (Unidentified Uses)
EBI did not observe evidence of hazardous substance or petroleum products containers at the Subject
Property that were not in connection with identified uses.
5.2.1.3 Unidentified Substances Containers
EBI did not observe evidence of unidentified substances containers at the Subject Property.
5.2.2 Waste Generation, Storage, and Disposal
EBI identified the following waste streams generated at the Subject Property:
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
17
DRA
F
T
Waste generation, Storage, and Disposal
Type of Waste /
Generation Process Type of Storage Location
Disposal Method /
Contractor
Non-Regulated Solid Waste
None identified NA NA NA
No evidence of improper solid waste management or the improper disposal of hazardous substances or
petroleum products was observed at the time of reconnaissance.
5.2.3 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) & Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs)
5.2.3.1 Existing Storage Tanks
Based upon site reconnaissance, interviews, and a review of state and local records, EBI identified no
evidence of existing USTs or ASTs located at the Subject Property.
5.2.3.2 Former Storage Tanks
Based upon site reconnaissance, interviews, and a review of state and local records, EBI did not identify
evidence of former USTs or ASTs located at the Subject Property.
5.2.4 Oil-Containing Equipment and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBS)
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are a chemical component of many dielectric fluids, heat transfer fluids,
hydraulic fluids, lubricating oils, paints, or coatings manufactured prior to July 2, 1979. Equipment that may
potentially contain PCBs includes electrical equipment such as transformers or capacitors or hydraulically
operated equipment, such as elevators, compaction equipment, or manufacturing equipment. The
manufacture and distribution in commerce of PCBs was banned for use in 1979 by the United States
Congress, which enacted the Toxic Substance and Control Act (TSCA). In accordance with US Code of Federal
Regulations Title 40 - Protection of Environment, Chapter 1 - Environmental Protection Agency, Subchapter R -
Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA), Part 761 - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Manufacturing, Processing,
Distribution in Commerce, and Use Prohibitions, the owner of a transformer or other PCB-containing
equipment is responsible for equipment maintenance and remediation in the event of a leak or release.
Non-Regulated Liquid Waste
Sanitary Sewage /
Routine Site Operations
(19) On-site Septic
Systems
Adjacent to
Manufactured Home
Units
N/A
Regulated Solid or Liquid Waste
None identified NA NA NA
Biomedical Waste
None identified NA NA NA
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
18
DRA
F
T
No oil-containing equipment was identified at the Subject Property.
5.3 Additional Site Conditions
5.3.1 Interior Drains, Trenches, or Sumps
No interior drains, trenches, or sumps were identified on the Subject Property.
5.3.2 Interior Stains or Corrosion
No interior stains or corrosion were identified at the Subject Property.
5.3.3 Unusual Odors
No unusual odors were identified at the Subject Property.
5.3.4 Interior Pools of Liquid
No pools of liquid were identified in the interior of the Subject Property.
5.3.5 Stained Soil or Pavement
No stained soil or pavement were identified at the Subject Property beyond minimal normal staining from
parked cars in parking spaces, which is not considered an environmental concern.
5.3.6 Stressed Vegetation
No stressed vegetation was observed at the Subject Property.
5.3.7 Indications of Solid Waste Disposal
No indications of solid waste disposal or fill were observed at the Subject Property.
5.3.8 Exterior Pits, Ponds or Lagoons
No exterior pits, ponds or lagoons were observed at the Subject Property.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
19
DRA
F
T
5.3.9 Wastewater or Stormwater Discharge/Disposal
The ground surface outside the buildings is relatively flat, with a gentle slope to the northeast. Stormwater
runoff from the asphalt- and gravel-paved parking areas adjacent to the existing buildings is directed by the
site topography, resulting in sheet flow dispersal to ditches along the adjacent road frontages. The ditches
are associated with the municipal stormwater sewerage system, operated by the City of Morganton. No
staining or other evidence of a release of hazardous substances or petroleum products was observed in the
vicinity of the stormwater drainage features.
5.3.10 Oil-Water Separators or Clarifiers
No oil-water separators, grease traps, or clarifiers were observed at the Subject Property.
5.3.11 Septic Systems or Cesspools
Sanitary sewerage generated at the Subject Property is discharged to nineteen (19) on-site septic systems.
The septic systems were reportedly installed at the time of construction of the existing manufactured home
complex in 1986. The septic systems are located adjacent to each manufactured home pad site. The septic
tanks filter solids from the buildings’ sanitary wastewater prior to the discharge of liquid effluent to leach
fields. The locations of the leach fields were not provided during this assessment. However, at the time of
assessment, EBI did not identify evidence of seepage or breakout, mismanagement of waste, or the
discharge of hazardous substances or petroleum products to the septic systems.
5.3.12 Wells (Drinking Water Wells, Monitoring Wells, Agricultural/Irrigation Wells, or Process Water
Wells)
No wells were observed or reported at the Subject Property.
5.3.13 Petroleum or Natural Gas Pipelines/Easements
No petroleum or natural gas pipelines or easements were observed or reported at the Subject Property.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
20
DRA
F
T
6.0 Interviews
The site contact or Key Site Manager was contacted to be interviewed to obtain information regarding
recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. Additionally, a Pre-Survey
Questionnaire was forwarded to the designated Subject Property contact. The Pre-Survey Questionnaire
has not been completed and returned to our offices. The information requested in the Pre-Survey
Questionnaire is intended to assist in gathering information that may be material to identifying recognized
environmental conditions in connection with the Subject Property. The Pre-Survey Questionnaire and any
accompanying documentation is presented in the PRE-SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE AND OTHER RELEVANT
DOCUMENTATION Appendix.
The following personnel were interviewed to obtain information regarding recognized environmental
conditions in connection with the Subject Property:
Interviews
Contact / Affiliation
Date of
Communication
Years Associated
with Subject
Property Information Provided
Mr. Mike Deford
Site Representative
Orange Community
Management, LLC
8/1/2023 Not Provided Mr. Deford reported that the existing
buildings were constructed in 1986.
Mr. Deford reported that the Subject
Property has been occupied by
residential development since 1986
and prior to the present day onsite
developments, was believed to be
undeveloped land. Mr. Deford was
unaware of any environmental
concerns associated with the Subject
Property. Mr. Deford also reported
that there is one septic tank per home
located somewhere next to/behind
each dwelling. The residential units
are heated via electric baseboards
and he was not aware of the current
and/or historic use of oil at the
property. Mr. Deford reported that
the property is connected to
municipal water service (Brentwood
Water Corp.) and is not aware of any
natural gas connection capabilities
provided to the property.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
21
DRA
F
T
7.0 Conditions Outside the Scope of ASTM Practice
The following sections address environmental issues or conditions at the Subject Property that parties may
wish to assess in connection with commercial real estate that are outside the scope of ASTM Practice
E1527-21 (non-scope considerations).
7.1 Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM)
Asbestos is a term used to describe a group of six naturally occurring crystalline fiber minerals. Asbestos has
excellent thermal stability, a high degree of tensile strength, and has been used extensively in the textile,
insulation, and building industries, particularly as a component in fireproofing, decorative coatings,
insulation materials, and as reinforcement for plaster binders in building products. Asbestos-containing
building materials are generally classified as friable or non-friable. Friable materials are those which can be
crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure, or by normal use or maintenance can be
expected to emit asbestos fibers into the air. Non-friable ACM is a potential concern if it is damaged by
maintenance work, demolition, or other activities, at which time it may be considered friable.
The manufactured home units are privately owned and are not considered a part of the Subject Property
asset. Interior assessment of the manufactured home units was not conducted as part of this assessment. No
other permanent structures were observed on the Subject Property at the time of assessment.
Due to the continued distribution of a wide variety of asbestos-containing building materials, asbestos may
be present in some of the roofing, flooring, wall and ceiling materials, caulking/putties, adhesives, spackling
compounds, and insulation materials, as well as other building materials that may be used at the Subject
Property. Sampling many of these materials requires techniques that may be destructive to subject facilities,
and in the case of roofing material, may void warranties. It is recommended that an asbestos inspection be
performed in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulatory requirements prior to
renovation, demolition, or other activities that could cause a material disturbance. Any removal or
disturbance of ACM or suspect ACM should be performed by properly trained personnel and in compliance
with federal, state, and local regulations.
7.2 Radon
Radon is a naturally-occurring, colorless and odorless radioactive gas that is generated primarily in granitic
rocks. The United States Surgeon General has published information that radon is a cause of lung cancer.
Radon usually enters a building at the points of contact or nearest contact with the soil, and therefore is the
greatest potential health concern to residents of the lowest level of a building.
The EPA Map of Radon Zones indicates that Burke County is located in a Zone 2 radon area. Zone 2 is
defined as an area that has a moderate potential for radon gas, with a predicted average indoor radon
screening level between 2.0 picoCuries per liter (pCi/L) and 4.0 pCi/L. The EPA recommended Action Level
for radon is 4.0 pCi/L.
Based upon the propensity and in accordance with the scope of work for this assessment, EBI did not
conduct a limited short-term radon screening at the subject Property.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
22
DRA
F
T
7.3 Lead-Based Paint (LBP)
Use of lead in household paint was banned by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) effective
January 1, 1978. The EPA and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) consider
lead-based paint as containing a lead concentration equal to or greater than 1.0 milligram per square
centimeter (mg/cm²) or 0.5% lead by weight, as defined by Title X of the 1992 Housing and Community
Development Act.
Based on the date of construction of the existing building(s) and that the manufactured home units are
privately owned and are not considered a part of the Subject Property asset, a LBP survey was not
conducted at the Subject Property.
7.4 Lead in Drinking Water
Lead has historically been used in pipes, solder, and brass fixtures used in water distribution systems and
building plumbing systems. In 1986, EPA banned the use of lead at concentrations exceeding 0.2% lead in
solder and 8% lead in other plumbing materials. Lead in drinking water results primarily from corrosion of
lead containing materials in service lines or from corrosion of lead containing materials in building plumbing
systems such as lead solder, brass, bronze, and other lead containing alloys. The EPA Action Level for lead in
public drinking water supplies is 0.015 parts per million (ppm) or 0.015 milligrams per liter (mg /L).
Municipal water service is provided to the Subject Property by Brentwood Water Corporation. Potable
water is reportedly obtained from Catawba River. Based upon review of the 2022 Drinking Water Supply
and Water Quality Report, the municipal water supply meets all current criteria established by the Safe
Drinking Water Act (SDWA) and local municipal drinking water standards, including those for lead. Based
upon the existing municipal water service and in accordance with the scope of work for this assessment, EBI
did not conduct lead-in-drinking water sampling at the Subject Property.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
23
DRA
F
T
8.0 Purpose And Scope
This report documents the findings, opinions, and conclusions of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
(ESA) of the property located at 2353 U.S. Highway 70 West in Morganton, North Carolina.
Critical Dates for Report Viability (ASTM E1527-21 § 4.6.2)
Component Date
Date of Government Record Reviews July 21, 2023
Date of Site Reconnaissance August 1, 2023
Date of Interviews August 1, 2023
Date of Declaration (Date of Issuance)August 9, 2023
8.1 Purpose
The purpose of this ESA was to identify recognized environmental conditions and certain environmental
conditions outside the scope of ASTM Practice E1527-21 in connection with the property at the time of the
property reconnaissance.
8.2 Scope-of-Services
This ESA was conducted utilizing a standard of good commercial and customary practice that was consistent
with the ASTM Practice E1527-21. Any significant scope-of-work additions, deletions or deviations to
ASTM Practice E1527-21 are noted below or in the corresponding sections of this report. The
scope-of-work for this assessment included an evaluation of the following:
• Physical characteristics of the Subject Property through a review of referenced sources for
topographic, geologic, soils and hydrologic data.
• Subject Property history through a review of referenced sources such as land deeds, fire insurance
maps, city directories, aerial photographs, prior reports, and interviews.
• Current Subject Property conditions, including observations and interviews regarding the
following: the presence or absence of hazardous substances or petroleum products; generation,
treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous, regulated, or biomedical waste; equipment that
utilizes oils which potentially contain PCBs; and storage tanks (aboveground and underground).
• Usage of surrounding area properties and the likelihood for releases of hazardous substances and
petroleum products (if known and/or suspected) to migrate onto the Subject Property.
• Information in referenced environmental agency databases and local environmental records,
within specified minimum search distances.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
24
DRA
F
T
• Past ownership through a review of available prior reports and local municipal file review.
The scope-of-work also included consideration of the following potential environmental conditions that are
outside the scope of ASTM Practice E1527-21: asbestos-containing materials (ACM), lead-based paint
(LBP), lead in drinking water, and radon.
8.3 Assumptions, Limitations and Exceptions
This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (the report) has been prepared for the use of Orange
Community Management, LLC, in accordance with the Standard Terms and Conditions for Third Party Due
Diligence Services approved and signed by Orange Community Management, LLC (the Agreement), and with
the limitations described below, all of which are integral parts of this report. A copy of the signed Standard
Terms and Conditions for Third Party Due Diligence Services is maintained at the EBI Consulting office in
Burlington, MA. To the extent any provisions of this report conflict with the terms of the Agreement, the
Agreement will control.
EBI has performed this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and
limitations of ASTM Standards E1527-21, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment Process. This report was prepared with no exceptions or deletions from
ASTM Standards E1527-21.
This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment has been prepared to assess a parcel of commercial real estate
with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. §9601) and petroleum products. As such, this practice
is intended to permit Orange Community Management, LLC to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for
the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on
CERCLA liability: that is, the practices that constitute “all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership
and uses of the Subject Property consistent with good commercial or customary practice” as defined in 42
U.S.C. § 9601(35)(B).
In defining a standard of good commercial and customary practice for conducting an environmental site
assessment of a parcel of property, the goal of the processes established by this practice is to identify
recognized environmental conditions. The term recognized environmental conditions means (1) the
presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release
to the environment; (2) the likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the
subject property due to a release or likely release to the environment; or (3) the presence of hazardous
substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property under conditions that pose a material
threat of a future release to the environment. The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum
products even under conditions in compliance with laws. The term does not include de minimis conditions
that generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be
the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
25
DRA
F
T
The information reported was obtained through sources deemed reasonably ascertainable, as defined in
ASTM Standard E1527-21; a visual site survey of areas readily observable, easily accessible or made
accessible by the Subject Property contact (performed by video reconnaissance) and interviews with
owners, agents, occupants, or other appropriate persons involved with the Subject Property and a review of
standard federal, state, and tribal environmental record sources. Municipal information was obtained
through review of reasonably ascertainable standard government record sources and interviews with the
authorities having jurisdiction over the Subject Property. Findings, conclusions, and recommendations
included in the report are based on our visual observations in the field, the standard environmental record
sources and municipal information reasonably obtained, information provided by the Client, and/or a review
of readily available and supplied documents and drawings. EBI relies completely on the information,
whether written, graphic, or verbal, provided by the Subject Property contact or as shown on any
documents reviewed or received from the Subject Property contact, owner or agent, or municipal source,
and assumes that information to be true and correct unless the information is known to be inaccurate or if it
is obvious, based on other information obtained as part of the assessment, that the information is not
accurate. Although there may have been some degree of overlap in the information provided by these
various sources, EBI did not attempt to verify independently the accuracy or completeness of all information
reviewed or received during the course of these environmental services.
The information reported, as well as EBI's findings, conclusions, and recommendations are based upon
sources deemed reasonably ascertainable, as defined in ASTM Standard E1527-21; a visual site survey of
areas readily observable, easily accessible or made accessible by the Subject Property contact and
interviews with owners, agents, occupants, or other appropriate persons involved with the Subject Property
and a review of standard federal, state, and tribal environmental record sources. Municipal information was
obtained through review of reasonably ascertainable standard government record sources and interviews
with authorities having jurisdiction over the Subject Property. Orange Community Management, LLC agrees
that EBI has no obligation to independently verify the accuracy or completeness of the information
reviewed or received during the course of these environmental services.EBI renders no opinion as to the
presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or under un-surveyed and/or inaccessible
portions of the Subject Property. Unsurveyed and inaccessible portions of the Subject Property are
described below. In addition, EBI renders no opinion as to the presence of hazardous substances or
petroleum products in, on or under the Subject Property where direct observation of the interior walls,
floor, or ceiling of a structure was obstructed by objects or coverings on or over these surfaces.
EBI Services and opinions are based on the scientific or technical tests or procedures specifically set forth in
the scope of the Services described in this report. The ASTM Standard E1527-21 does not encompass
analytical testing to evaluate asbestos containing materials, radon, lead-based paint, drinking water quality,
indoor air quality, stored chemicals, debris, fill materials, surface water, or subsurface samples (soil and
groundwater) as part of a Phase I ESA. Because geologic and soil formations are inherently random, variable,
and indeterminate in nature, the Services and opinions provided under this Agreement are not guaranteed
to be a representation of actual conditions on the Subject Property, which are also subject to change with
time as a result of natural or man-made processes, including water permeation. In performing the Services,
EBI used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by environmental consultants or engineers
performing similar services in the same or similar locality at the same time and under similar circumstances.
Any analytical testing performed at the Subject Property has been conducted in accordance with the
Standard Terms and Conditions for Third Party Due Diligence Services approved and signed by Orange
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
26
DRA
F
T
Community Management, LLC (the Agreement) and the client-specific Scope of Work. Unless otherwise
specified herein, such testing involves screening methods intended to provide a broad and approximate
evaluation of conditions at readily accessible portions of the Subject Property, limited by project constraints,
and should not be construed as a comprehensive program designed to comply with a specific regulatory
program. If a thorough and regulatory-compliant study is warranted based on the findings of the Phase I
ESA, EBI will recommend the appropriate further investigation. In certain cases, quantitative laboratory
testing is performed as part of the assessment and analyses have been conducted by an outside laboratory.
EBI relies upon the data provided by the outside laboratory, and has not conducted an independent
evaluation of the reliability of this data. No other representation, expressed or implied, and no warranty or
guarantee is included or intended. The report speaks only as of its date, in the absence of a specific written
update of the report, signed and delivered by EBI. Additional information that becomes available after our
survey and draft submission concerning the Subject Property should be provided to EBI so that our
conclusions may be revised and modified if necessary, at additional cost.
Client and EBI agree that to the fullest extent permitted by law, EBI shall not be liable to Client for any
special, indirect, consequential, punitive, exemplary, incidental or indirect damages or losses whatsoever,
whether caused by EBI's negligence, errors, omissions, strict liability, breach of contract, breach of warranty
or other cause or causes whatsoever. Further, by agreeing to allow EBI to incorporate photographic and/or
video documentation taken by a third-party site contact and/or personnel not affiliated with EBI, Client
agrees to release and hold harmless EBI for any inaccuracies or deficiencies in such photographic or video
documentation.
8.4 Special Terms and Conditions
This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (the report) has been prepared to identify recognized
environmental conditions in connection with the Subject Property, as further discussed above. This report
can be relied upon by only the parties stated in the transmittal letter at the front of this report. In the event
that EBI provides a purchaser written permission to use this report, EBI's liability to such purchaser is
limited to the cost of the report. Amendments to EBI's limitations as stated herein that may occur after
issuance of the report are considered to be included in this report. Payment for the report is made by, and
EBI's contract and report extends to Orange Community Management, LLC only, in accordance with our
Standard Terms and Conditions for Third Party Due Diligence Services.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
27
DRA
F
T
9.0 References
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment References
ASTM Designation E1527-21 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment Process.
Burke County Assessor Property Website: https://gis.burkenc.org/
Environmental Data Resources, LLC, EDR Historical Aerial Photograph report
Environmental Data Resources, LLC, EDR Historical Sanborn Map report
Environmental Data Resources, LLC, EDR Historical Topographic Map report
Environmental Data Resources, LLC, The EDR City Directory Abstract
Environmental Data Resources, LLC, The EDR Radius Report with GeoCheck®
USGS Topographic Map, Glen Apline, North Carolina Quadrangle, 7.5-Minute Series, dated 1986.
Web Soil Survey, NRCS, U.S. Department of Agriculture, August 1, 2023, On-line:
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
28
DRA
F
T
10.0 Terminology
ASTM E1527-21 Terminology
The following provides definitions and descriptions of certain terms defined by ASTM Standard Practice
E1527-21. The Standard Practice should be referenced for further detail related to definitions or additional
explanation regarding the meaning of terms.
Recognized Environmental Condition (REC):(1) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in,
on, or at the subject property due to a release to the environment; (2) the likely presence of hazardous
substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release or likely release to
the environment; or (3) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject
property under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.
De minimis condition:A condition related to a release that generally does not present a threat to human
health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to
the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. A condition determined to be a de minimis condition is
not a recognized environmental condition nor acontrolled recognized environmental condition.
Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition (CREC):Recognized environmental condition affecting the
subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or
authorities with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to
implementation of required controls (for example, activity and use limitations or other property use
limitations).
Historical Recognized Environmental Condition (HREC):A previous release of hazardous substances or petroleum
products affecting the subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable
regulatory authority or authorities and meeting unrestricted use criteria established by the applicable
regulatory authority or authorities without subjecting the subject property to any controls (for
example,activity and use limitations or other property use limitations). A historical recognized environmental
condition is not arecognized environmental condition.
Material Threat:An obvious threat which is likely to lead to a release that, in the opinion of the environmental
professional, would likely result in impact to public health or the environment. An example might include an
aboveground storage tank system that contains a hazardous substance and which shows evidence of damage.
The damage would represent a material threat if it is deemed serious enough that it may cause or contribute
to tank integrity failure with a release of contents to the environment.
Obvious:That which is plain or evident; a condition or fact that could not be ignored or overlooked by a
reasonable observer.
Property Use Limitation:Limitation or restriction on current or future use of a property in connection with a
response to arelease, in accordance with the applicable regulatory authority or authorities that
allows hazardous substances or petroleum products to remain in place at concentrations exceeding
unrestricted use criteria.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
29
DRA
F
T
Business Environmental Risk (BER):A risk that can have a material environmental or environmentally-driven
impact on the business associated with the current or planned use of commercial real estate, not necessarily
related to those environmental issues required to be investigated in this practice. Consideration of business
environmental risk issues may involve addressing one or more non-scope considerations.
Significant Data Gap:Adata gap that affects the ability of the environmental professional to identify
a recognized environmental condition. Significant Data Gaps and how they affect the ability to identify RECs/
CRECs must be discussed in the Conclusions as well as if additional information would assist in determining
the presence of RECs/CRECs.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
30
DRA
F
T
Appendix A
Photographs
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project # 1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina
DRA
F
T
Street view of Subject Property.1.
Northeast side of Subject Property (reported location of historical drum
dumping).2.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
32
DRA
F
T
Representative residential dwelling.3.
Representative residential dwellings.4.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
33
DRA
F
T
Representative residential dwelling.5.
Representative residential dwelling.6.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
34
DRA
F
T
Representative residential dwelling.7.
Representative residential dwelling.8.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
35
DRA
F
T
Representative residential dwelling.9.
North adjacent property (across US 70).10.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
36
DRA
F
T
Northeast adjacent property.11.
Northwest adjacent property.12.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
37
DRA
F
T
South adjacent residential property.13.
South adjacent powerline easement.14.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project #1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina 28655
38
DRA
F
T
Appendix B
Figures
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project # 1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
Burke County, NCAugust 1, 2023

Owner:DELLINGER, BETTY D5196 SMAWLEY AVE MORGANTON, NC 28655PropertyAddress:2353 US 70 WMORGANTON 28655PROPERTY_DESC
PIN:1752704512PIN EXT:000REID:39371Property Value:$174,706Acreage:5.35Deed Book:001501Deed Page:00987Deed Date:9/27/2005 1:00:00 AM
Disclaimer: The information contained on this page is taken from aerial mapping,tax mapping, and public records and is NOT to be construed or used as a surveyor 'legal description'. Only a licensed professional land surveyor can legallydetermine precise locations, elevations, length and direction of a line, and areas.
0 750375
Feet
1:4,750
1 inch = 396 feet
DRA
F
T
Appendix C
Pre-Survey Questionnaire and Other Relevant Documentation
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project # 1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina
DRA
F
T
Property Summary
Tax Year: 2023
Building Summary
REID 39371 PIN 1752-70-4512 Property Owner DELLINGER, BETTY D
Location Address 2353 US 70 W Property Description MHP WEST 70 MHP Owner's Mailing Address 5196 SMAWLEY AVE
MORGANTON NC 28655
Administrative Data
Plat Book & Page
Old Map #16
Market Area 5075
Township SILVERCREEK
Planning
Jurisdiction
BURKE
City
Fire District WEST END FD
Spec District
Land Class MOBILE HOME
PARK
History REID 1
History REID 2
Acreage 5.35
Permit Date
Permit #
Transfer Information
Deed Date 9/27/2005
Deed Book 001501
Deed Page 00987
Revenue Stamps $90,000
Package Sale Date
Package Sale Price
Land Sale Date 9/27/2005
Land Sale Price $90,000
Improvement Summary
Total Buildings 0
Total Units 0
Total Living Area 0
Total Gross Leasable Area 0
Property Value
Total Appraised Land Value $75,906
Total Appraised Building Value
Total Appraised Misc
Improvements Value
$98,800
Total Cost Value $174,706
Total Appraised Value - Valued By
Cost
$174,706
Other Exemptions
Exemption Desc
Use Value Deferred
Historic Value Deferred
Total Deferred Value
Total Taxable Value $174,706
Photograph
DRA
F
T
Misc Improvements Summary
Land Summary
Ownership History
Notes Summary
Card
#
Unit
Quantity Measure Type Base
Price
Eff
Year
Phys Depr
(% Bad)
Econ Depr
(% Bad)
Funct Depr
(% Bad)
Common
Interest (%
Good)
Value
0 19 SIZE SITE, MOBILE
HOME GRADE D
$5,200.00 2013 0 0 0 $98,800
Total Misc Improvements Value Assessed: $98,800
Zoning Soil Class Description Size Rate Size Adj. Factor Land Adjustment Land Value
R-2 PRIME_SITE 0.50 BY THE ACRE PRICE $26,180 MARKET ADJUSTMENT-200.00 $26,180
R-2 ROAD_FRONT 0.30 BY THE ACRE PRICE $5,340 0.96 MARKET ADJUSTMENT-200.00 $3,076
R-2 BALANCE 4.55 BY THE ACRE PRICE $5,340 0.96 MARKET ADJUSTMENT-200.00 $46,650
Total Land Value Assessed: $75,906
Land Class: MOBILE HOME PARK Deeded Acres: 5.35 Calculated Acres: 5.35
Owner Name Deed Type % Ownership Stamps Sale Price Book Page Deed Date
Current DELLINGER, BETTY D DEED 100 90000 $90,000 001501 00987 9/27/2005
1 Back LANE, GARY ALTON ET DEED 100 27000 $27,000 000764 00523 3/1/1990
2 Back CRAWLEY, JAMES W/ CRAWLEY, JUDY W DEED 100 0 000693 00865 2/5/1986
3 Back BAKER, JEANNE C DEED 100 0 000627 00721 1/1/1900
4 Back BAKER, JOHNNY MORGAN/ BAKER, JEANNE C DEED 100 0 000526 00775 1/1/1900
Building Card Date Line Notes
No Data
DRA
F
T
6876 Susquehanna Trail S York, PA 17403
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.ebiconsulting.com
ENVIROBUSINESS, INC. LOCATIONS | ATLANTA, GA | BALTIMORE, MD | BURLINGTON, MA | CHICAGO, IL
DALLAS, TX | DENVER, CO | HOUSTON, TX | LOS ANGELES, CA | NEW YORK, NY | PHOENIX, AZ
PORTLAND, OR | SAN FRANCISCO, CA | SEATTLE, WA | YORK, PA
July 31, 2023
Re:Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Public Records Request
Subject Property Name: 2353 US 70 W
Project #: 1123003753
Address: 2353 U.S. 70, Morganton, North Carolina 28655
To Whom it May Concern:
EBI Consulting (EBI) is conducting a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) at the above-referenced Subject
Property. As part of the ESA process, we would like to request access to records regarding the following, as applicable:
- Installation or removal of storage tanks (above and underground)
- Hazardous materials storage or release
- Hazardous waste generation or discharge
- Asbestos or lead-based paint abatement
We understand that these records may not be available. Please return any available records to our attention either via
email at [e-mail] or via fax at [phone]. Also, please contact us if fees are expected
to exceed $50.00. If there are any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
JOSHUA RITZ
EBI CONSULTING
21 B STREET
BURLINGTON, MA 01803
[e-mail]
DRA
F
T
6876 Susquehanna Trail SYork, PA 17403
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.ebiconsulting.com
ENVIROBUSINESS, INC. LOCATIONS | ATLANTA, GA | BALTIMORE, MD | BURLINGTON, MA | CHICAGO, IL
DALLAS, TX | DENVER, CO | HOUSTON, TX | LOS ANGELES, CA | NEW YORK, NY | PHOENIX, AZ
PORTLAND, OR | SAN FRANCISCO, CA | SEATTLE, WA | YORK, PA
July 31, 2023
Re:Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Public Records Request
Subject Property Name: 2353 US 70 W
Project #: 1123003753
Address: 2353 U.S. 70, Morganton, North Carolina 28655
To Whom it May Concern:
EBI Consulting (EBI) is conducting a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) at the above-referenced Subject
Property. As part of the ESA process, we would like to request access to records regarding the following, as applicable:
- Current and historical building permits
-Current and historical Certificates of Occupancy
-Dates of public sewer and water connection
-Installation or removal of storage tanks (above and underground)
We understand that these records may not be available. Please return any available records to our attention either via
email at [e-mail] or via fax at [phone]. Also, please contact us if fees are expected
to exceed $50.00. If there are any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
JOSHUA RITZ
EBI CONSULTING
21 B STREET
BURLINGTON, MA 01803
[e-mail]
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
Mr. and Mrs. Gary Lane4466 Patton RoadMorganton, NC 28655
Re:Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites Priority List
US 70 DRUM DUMP
NCD981472624MORGANTON, BURKE
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Lane:
The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) is the lead agency for the protection of environmental resources. DEQ's Division of Waste Management's Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (Branch) is responsible for oversight and approval of the assessment and remediation of sites contaminated with hazardous substances. The site listed above has been included on the fiscal
year (FY) 2020-21 Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites Priority List (Priority List). The Priority List includes 511 sites where past uncontrolled disposal or spills of hazardous substances have been ranked according to their risk to human health and the environment.
and/ or you are identified as the party responsible for the contamination. As required by law, this letter is to notify you of the site's
inclusion on the Priority List which can be viewed at the following website: Each site is ranked on a .01 to 100-point scale according to the ranking system describe in 15A NCAC 13C .0200. Higher scores indicate higher risk
to human health and the environment. This list is current as of the end of the State fiscal year on June 30, 2021, so if site has since received a "No Further Action" determination or has entered the Branch's voluntary cleanup program, you may disregard this letter.
Why you are receiving this letter:
Actions required by certain parties:
done so, is required under North Carolina groundwater quality regulations (15A NCAC 2L) to take immediate action to stop
unpermitted discharges and address any hazards posed by the contaminants. If groundwater has become contaminated from the
discharge, the responsible party must take immediate action to eliminate the source(s) of contamination. Failure of a responsible party to take the initial discharge abatement steps required in 15A NCAC 2L may result in the assessment of a civil penalty or other enforcement action against that responsible party.
Disclosure of contamination:
(CERCLA) imposes the duty to disclose contamination before a property is transferred. Further, Under CERCLA, the owner or operator of a contaminated property could be held responsible for the property's cleanup, based solely on their current ownership of the property. Please be advised that the North Carolina Residential Property Disclosure Act, North Carolina General Statute
§47E, also contains requirements relating to the disclosure of contamination present on residential property.
ROY COOPER
ELIZABETH S. BISER
MICHAEL SCOTT
Governor
Secretary
Director
https://deq.nc.gov/waste-management/dwm/sf/ihs/inactive-hazardous-sites-branch-spl-table-fy-20202021
May 20, 2022
A Property you own is affected by the above-identified contaminated site
Any person or entity responsible for the contamination that has not already
The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality | Division of Waste Management
217 West Jones Street | 1646 Mail Service Center | Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
919.707.8200
DRA
F
T
How to remove the site from the Priority List:
of the site by participating in voluntary cleanup program under an administrative agreement with the Branch. The first step is
to complete and submit a Site Conditions Questionnaire found on our website: https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/waste-
management/superfund-section/inactive-hazardous-sites-program. Branch staff will review the information and assist with a path forward to achieve an approved cleanup. In general, State staff will oversee and approve cleanup actions at the high-risk sites. Lower-risk sites are managed through a privatized oversight program, known as the Registered Environmental
Consultant (REC) Program, whereby Branch-approved environmental consulting firms conduct and certify the site
assessment and cleanup in place of State oversight. Regardless of whether State staff or an REC oversees the cleanup action, if certain criteria are met, a party can conduct a more expedient lower-cost cleanup to less stringent, risk based standards using land controls.
Benefits of conducting an approved voluntary cleanup action under an Administration Agreement:
Note that State Brownfields Agreements for property redevelopment do not excuse responsible parties from contaminant
cleanup and will not automatically result in site closure. Brownfields Agreements serve to implement abatement measures for safe reuse of a purchased property and typically do not address (1) the removal or treatment of contaminant source areas on the Brownfield property and (2) contamination that extends onto neighboring properties. The site will remain on the
Priority List.For more information:
Sincerely,
Janet Macdonald, Head Inactive Hazardous Site Branch
Superfund Section
Any party can complete an approved environmental cleanup
John Walch - Easter Unit - [phone]Collin Day - Western Unit - [phone]
Site records are accessible online by clicking on Superfund Section File Access at the above web site. To schedule an appointment to view the files or to request that a copy of the Priority List be mailed to you, please
contact Scott Ross at [phone].
If you have any questions regarding this letter or how to conduct a cleanup of your
property, please contact me at [phone] or preferably the Regional Supervisor of the county where the site is located. A larger regional map can be viewed at the above web site
• Site is removed from the Inactive Hazardous Sites Priority List • Remedial actions lead to an approved site closure
• Lower-cost, risk-based cleanup standards may be an option • Lenders involved in property transfers often require state or federal approval of cleanup • Proactive work, regardless of responsibility, provides community trust
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality | Division of Waste Management
217 West Jones Street | 1646 Mail Service Center | Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
919.707.8200
DRA
F
T
*684S ERBSF 1 0 ,639*
*684SERBSF10,639 *
Site Name (Subject): US 70 DRUM DUMP
Site ID (Document ID): NCD981472624
Document Name (DocType): Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection (PA/SI)
Report Segment:
Description:
Date of Document:
Date Received :
Box: Enter SF and # with no spaces
Access Level:
Division:
Section:
Program (Document Group):
Document Category:
Print Report for
Record
Go to New
Blank Record
Site Investigation Report
8/1/1987
SF10,639
PUBLIC
WASTE MANAGEMENT
SUPERFUND
SERB (SERB)
FACILITY
Go to New Record -
(default to last
record values)
Delete Record
DRA
F
T
,-----.-----------·-----·"""' ----
I
II
II
I
II
I II
t•
II
I
il I
I
I
'I
I
,I
I
!I
I• I
II
!. I
SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT
US 70 DRUM DUMP
NC D981472624
Morganton, N.C.
August 1987
By
Pat DeRosa, Waste Management Specialist
NC Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Environmental Health Section
CERCIA Unit
--------------·~----·----~ ------·-
-l
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The US 70 Drum Dump is located in Burke County, ~X:: about 10 miles west
of ~1organton and 2 miles east of the Mcibwell County line. The site is at the
bottom of an embankment on the south side of US 70, approximately 0.2 miles
east of the Dysartsville Road intersection. A pile of 55-gallon drums and
other trash were discovered blocking the culvert under US 70 on July 2, 1986.
The drums were rusted and waste material was reportedly spilled onto the
ground around the pile~ The source of the drums was unknown~
Preliminary waste samples were collected by Burke County Emergency
Management and NC Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch on July 2, 1986.
On July 8, 1986, NC CERCLA Unit personnel conducted a site inspection at the
site. Additional samples of waste, soil, and groundwater were collected. All
of the above samples were submitted to the NC State Laboratory of Public
Health on July 10, 1986, for organic and inorganic analyses~ No inorganic
contaminants were detected at levels significantly above background. Three
organic contaminants, chlorobenzene, bis (2-ethylhe.xyl) phthalate, and
methenamine were measured at or significantly above detection limits in soil
-and waste. Methenamine, the predominant contaminant identified, is not,
however, lis ted as a CERCLA hazardous substance. No contaminants were
detected in groundwater. The site was unfenced, accessible, and appeared to
pose a direct contact hazard to local residents.
On March 13-14, 1987, EPA Region IV, Emergency and Remedial Response
Branch, collected composite waste and soil samples at the site. No background
soil sample was collected. Total lead was the only inorganic contaminant
detected at levels significantly higher in solid waste than in soil. Twelve
organic compounds were measured in waste; chlorobenzene, ethyl benzene,
methylene chloride, tetrachloroethylene, xylene, 1,2-dichlorobenzene,
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene. Subsequently, fifty-nine 55-gallon drums of waste
were removed from the site, overpacked, and shipped off site for incineration
or disposal. No soil was removed.
Currently, the direct contact hazard at the site has been eliminated.
Reedy Creek, the nearest downstream surface water is 1. 75 miles from the
site. It is used for fishing and canoeing. City water from unthreatened
surface water sources is available to some residents within three miles. The
remaining residents are dependent on private wells. An estimated 3,125 local
residents are using groundwater for water supply. Wells are set in the
saprolite or bedrock at an average depth of 175 feet. The water table is
encountered around 52 feet and the unsaturated zone is a ''clayey''
soil/saprolite.
There is no evidence of surface water or groundwater contamination at
the site. Follow-up work at the site might include soil sampling to ensure
that no residual contaminants remain.
..:.,2-
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
BACKGROUND
IDeation
The US 70 Drum Dump is located in Burke Cotmty, :OC about 10 miles west
of Morganton and 2 miles east of the Hc!X>well Cotmty line~ The site is at the
bottom of an embankment on the south side of US 70, approximately 0.2 miles
east of the ~sartsville Road intersection~ The coordinates at the site are:
Latitude: 35 41' 53"; !.Dngitude: 081° 51' 17" (Map 1 and 2, Appendix A).
Site Layout
The site occupies an area approximately 30 by 50 feet square at the
mouth of a culvert tmder US 70. It is located on the northeast corner of the
Jim Crawley property, bordered by US 70 to the north and the Elgie McGalliard
property to the east (3~11) ~ The McGalliard residence is about 200 feet
southeast of the site (Map 1, Appendix A) • Drums and trash were piled at the
bottom of the embankment blocking the mouth of the culvert~ Waste was
scattered and spilled as far as 50 feet south of the highway~ Vegetation was
grown up arotmd the pile; however, the area was tmfenced and accessible (3 ,31) •
Ownership History
The ownership history of the site, from the current owner going back
approximately 15 years, is listed below (11):
Jim Crawley (current owner)
Mrs. Johnny Baker
Thomas Mack Ray
Jack Farris
These individuals reside in the Morganton area.
Site Use History
The site was discovered on July 2, 1986, by a backhoe team from the NC
Department of Transportation (OOT) • The backhoe operator was attempting to
clear debris from the mouth of the culvert when he hit the drums.
Approximately 25-30 drums were estimated on site at that time. Some drums
were empty, however, others ·appeared to contain dried paint waste, white
granular material, and a greenish, grease-like substance. Some waste was
spilled when the backhoe pierced the drums. One drum reportedly contained
liguid that coagulated on exposure to air. A strong odor of chlorine or
ammonia was also reported (31). The current property owner and adjacent land
owner had no knowledge of the source or contents of the drums (3).
-3-
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Permit and Regulatory History
The site is not known to have any prior permit or regulatory history.
Remedial Actions to Date
Following the subject field investigation, the NC CERCLA Unit requested
that a removal action be initiated at this site by EPA Region IV~ Emergency
and Remedial Response ltranch (32). On March 9, 1987, a removal action was
initiated, and EPA began staging and temporary storage of the drums.
Composite waste and soil samples were collected on l-1arch 13-14, 1987. Drums
were moved to the Burke County Landfill on Kirksey Road on l-larch 16-17, 1987.
On receipt of the sampling results, drums were overpacked and, on April 14-15,
1987, drums were shipped off site for disposal (15).
Summary Trip Report
On July 7, 1986, NC CERCLA Unit personnel, Lee Crosby, Pat DeRosa, and
Mary Giguere visited the subject site~ Keith Masters, NC OOR/DHS, Solid and
Hazardous Waste Management Branch, directed us to the site and provided
background information. We observed 25 to 30 rusted 55-gallon drums at the
bottom of a 30 ft. embankment on the south side of US 70. 'Ihe topography was
such that surface water would drain from the south onto the site and through
the culvert to the other side of the road. However, no surface water was
observed and the drain pipe appeared to be plugged with drums and debris.
Tires, household trash, and rolls of paper about four feet wide, were also
observed in the culvert. 'Ihe drums had been covered with a clear plastic tarp
and the eastern embankment had been taped off to discourage public entry to
the site. We met briefly with the McGalliard fBmily, the owners of the
property adjoining the site to the east. We also met with Jim Crawley, the
site owner. Both land owners gave us their permission to enter the property
and collect samples as needed. Neither Mr. Crawley nor the McGalliards,
however, had any information as to the source or contents of the drums. Later
that day, we also met with Nick \olaters and Dale Murphy from Burke County
Emergency Management to discuss the site.
On July 8, 1986, we met with Mr. Crawley again to collect a sample from
an inactive well at his shop approximately 0.2 miles west of the site. A
sample could not be obtained, however, due to a break in the pipe between the
pump and the tap. We then proceeded to the site, donned protective clothing,
and began sampling at 0950. At that time, the weather was sunny and hot
(approximately 90 F), with no noticeable wind. Two waste saniples were
collected from an accessible open drum and spill area. 'Ihe drum contained
white rubbery chips and the spill appeared to be a greasy material with a
caramel-like consistency. Additional waste samples could not be collected due
to the physical hazard posed by the unstable drum and trash pile. HNu
readings monitored throughout sampling did not exceed background. A surface
soil sample was collected 5 ft. south of the drums and a background soil
sample was collected approximately 150 ft. upgradient. The nearest well,
located at the residence of Ray Allison approximately 400 ft. west of the
site, was also sampled. Sampling was completed by 1130. Samples were
submitted to the NC State Laboratory of Public Health for organic and
inorganic analyses.
-r4-
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Observers on site during sampling included: Clint Patton, Burke County
Fire Harshall 1 s Office; Jim Fulrrer, Burke County Maintenance Engineer; Steve
Foster, Burke County Training Officer for Emergency Management; Dale Meyer,
Burke County Division of Solid Waste; and Elgie McGalliard, adjacent property
owner. After sampling, we met briefly with Steve Foster to discuss the site.
-5-
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ENVIRONMENTAL SE'ITING
Topography
The site is in Burke County on the western edge of the Piedmont
physiographic province. Gentle hills and broad valleys of the Piedmont give
way to the steep, eastern front of the Blue Ridge Mountains to the northwest
(17) • The site is located at the bottom of an embankment on the south side of
US 70 (3) • Drums at the site were observed from 0 -50 feet from the
highway~ An estimated one foot drop in elevation over this 50 foot horizontal
distance yields an average facility slope of 2% (11)~
Surface Water
Surface drainage from the site, flows northeast under US 70 to an
intermittent creek. The nearest downstream surface water is Reedy Creek. The
distance from the site to Reedy Creek~ measured along the intermittent creek
is 1. 7 5 miles or 9, 240 feet~ The change in elevation over this horizontal
distance is 1292 1 -1080' above mean sea level, or 212 feet (6,11). The slope
of the intervening terrain is therefore 2.3% (1).
From Reedy Creek, surface water flows 0.5 miles to Muddy Creek which
continues 1. 75 miles to the Catawba River (6). There are no surface water
intakes for drinking water supply or irrigation of food crops within 3 miles
downstream of the site (8,9,10). Parts of this stream segment, however, are
heavily used for fishing and canoeing (12).
Geology and Soils
The site lies within the Blue Ridge-Inner Piedmont hydrogeologic unit.
As is typical of the NC Piedmont and Mountain regions, the site is underlain
by a layer of soil and saprolite derived from the underlying fractured bedrock
(13,17). The bedroCk is comprised of a granitic gneiss.or quartz-biotite
gneiss complex which weathers to a reddish-clay saprolite (17). The average
thickness of the saprolite, based on well casing depths, is 63 feet (17).
Groundwater
Private wells within 3 miles of the site are set in either the saprolite
or the bedrock layer (17 ,18). These layers function as a single aquifer and
are hydraulically connected (18, 19). Groundwater is stored in the saprolite
and transmitted through the bedroCk via a fracture system which functions as a
groundwater pipeline (13). The movement of water from the water table to the
fractured bedrock is therefore unconfined.
Wells within 3 miles of the site averar,e around 175 feet deep with 63
feet of casing. The water table aquifer or 'aquifer of concern" is generally
encountered in the saprolite layer at an average of 52 feet below land surface
(17). The unsaturated zone of the soil/saprolite layer is described as
"clayey'' with an estimated average hydraulic conductivity of lQ-5 em/sec
(19). The fractured bedrock has an estimated hydraulic conductivity of Io-3
em/sec (1).
.-6-
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Climate and Meteorology
In the Morganton area, mean annual precipitation is 52 inches and mean
annual evaporation is 36 inches. Net annual precipitation is therefore 16
inches. The 1 year 24-hr. rainfall for the area is 3.5 inches (1) •
Land Use
The site is approximately 10 miles west of the City of Morganton and 3
miles west of the Town of Glen Alpine (Map 2, Appendix A) : This is a lightly
populated rural residential/commercial area along the south side of US 70 •
The nearest residence is approximately 200 feet southeast of the site (Map 1,
Appendix A) ~
Population Distribution
Three circles, representing a 1-, 2-and 3-mile radius around the site,
were constructed on the 1962 USGS 7 .5' quadrangle maps for Glen Alpine, NC and
Marion East, NC (Map 1, Appendix A) • Due to the age of these maps, additional
sources were sought to obtain more accurate population values~ Tax maps, from
the Burke County Tax Office, were used to count all horres within 3 miles of
the site in Burke County (24,25,26). House count values were multiplied by
3.8 persons per home (1). No tax maps were available for McDowell County,
therefore, the relative increase in the rural population between 1960 and 1980
was applied to a house count obtained from the 1962 USGS quadrangle maps
(6,27 ,28). The total populations estimated within 1, 2, and 3 miles of the
site are listed below:
1 mile:
2 miles:
3 miles:
Water Supply
1178 persons
4030 persons
6627 persons
City water from the Glen Alpine and the Brentwood Water Systems is
available to some residents within 3 miles of the site. Both systems purchase
their water from Morganton Which uses an unthreatened surface water source
(22,23). There are no community well systems within 3 miles (20,21). The
remaining residents without access to city water are assumed to be using
private wells. In addition, approximately 5% of the individuals with access
to city water use private wells (23). The total population using groundwater
within 3 miles of the site is estimated at 3,125 residents (24-28).
The nearest well is located approximately 400 feet west of the site at
the Ray Allison residence. This well also supplies water to a neighboring
home (11). Wells in the area average around 175 feet in depth with 63 feet of
casing (17).
-]-
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Critical Environments
The site is located in the western Piedmont region of North Carolina.
There are no coastal wetlands within 2 miles of the site and no freshwater
wetlands have been identified within 1 mile (Map 1, Appendix A). In addition,
there are no critical habitats of federally listed endangered species within 1
mile of the site (7).
-8-
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WASTE TYPES & QUANIT.TIES
Waste Quantities
Fifty-five 55-gallon drums of solid waste and four 55-gallon drums of
liquid waste were found and removed from the site (15). These drums were
overpaCked in larger drums and manifested off site for disposal (16).
Waste Disposal·Nethod
Waste in steel, 55-gallon drums was apparently piled or dumped over the
embankment into the mouth of the culvert. No additional containment was
observed (3,15).
Waste Types
The source of the solid and liquid wastes disposed on site is yet
unknown. Wastes were described as ''white rubbery chips or resin, dried paint
waste, white granular material, greasy caramel-like waste, and grease-like
material with a greenish cast" (2,3,31). The hazardous constituents detected
in the wastes are discussed in '!LABORATCR.Y DATA.11
-9-
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-1
LABORATORY DATA
Preliminary waste samples were collected by Burke County Emergency
Management and :OC Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch on July 2, 1986.
Additional samples of waste, soil, and groundwater were collected by NC CERCLA
Unit personnel on July 8, 1986. Sampling locations are shown in Figure 1~
All of the above samples were submitted to the NC State Laboratory of Public
Health on July 10, 1986 for organic and inorganic analyses (2,3). No
inorganic contaminants were detected at levels significantly above
background. Three organic contaminants, chlorobenzene, bis (2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate, and methenamine were measured at or significantly above detection
limits in soil and waste (2) • Methenamine, the predominant contaminant
identified, is not, however, listed as a CERCLA hazardous substance (30) ~ No
contaminants were detected in groundwater (3). A copy of these laboratory
results is included in Appendix B and summarized in Table 1.
On March 13-14, 1987, EPA Region IV, Emergency and Remedial Response
Branch, collected composite waste and soil samples at the site (15). No
background soil sample was collected. Total lead was the only inorganic
contaminant detected at significantly higher levels in solid waste than in
soil. Twelve organic compounds were measured in waste sampled at the site
(5). The results of these analyses are summarized in Table 2.
-10-
DRA
F
T
L/ooH
/Vo ie..: ~ arntP/eo 11-fr, :-1.0 I
I
tAJe re:_ c..a I I e c fe.-dl .
J~ ~) ;9 o(p. anc(J
. /Ylcu'!~ iv /C a/€-l'j A-.
t);:.h. 'e. . /VV J'tJ ~ /," hJ
cU ·~ram t»?t S jJr() L/7 '~e_d. .
. u..s 'lo
!®
13k &. ' . ~ '
l
i
.I
! j
i . ! t
: +
.. , ... ,
I . .-I
.-I I
------·---·-.:.-·-:-:-·-:----
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.OCATICN II 'IYPE
1 Waste
Solid
2 Waste
Sludge
3 Soil
4 Soil
5 Private
Well
6 Soil
7 Waste
Sludge
8 Waste
Solid
9 Waste
Liquid
J = Est~ted value
TABLE 1
SUMMARY DATA: SAMPLES COILECI'ED JULY 2, 8, 1986
DESCRIPTICN CONIA11INANI'S DETECTED (PPB)
White resin material Methenamine 831,884 J
Chlorobenzene 50
Viscous spilled material Methenamine 431,667 J
5 ft. south of dnnns, Bis (2-ethylhexyl) 224,000
surface soil phthalate
Chlorobenzene 50
Background, surface soil None detected
~150 ft. upgradient (South)
Ray Allison residence None detected
Purplish surface soil None detected
Greasy material from Methenamine 28,542 {ppm)
spilled drum
White granular solid from Methenamine 7,833 J
open drum
Staming liquid from drum Nme detected
area
-12-
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
TABLE 2
SUM1ARY Jl«\TA: C<l1PCSITE SAMPLES COILEcrED MARCH 13-14, 1987
Contaminant
Detected
Lead {Total)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl benzene
Methylenechloride
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
Trichloroethylene
Xylene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dicblorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Soil
<. lppm
~ 10 ppb
<. 10 ppb
< 10 ppb
<.10 ppb
< 10 ppb
~ 10 ppb
< 10 ppb
< 0.1 ppm
< 0.1 ppm
< 0.1 ppm
1, 2 ,4-Trichlorobenzene < 0.1 ppm
Sludge &
Liquid
0.29 ppm
70.96 ppm
1,005 ppm
86.63 ppm
<. 1 ppm
28.88 ppm
103.7 ppm
3139 ppm
346 ppm
183 ppm
387 ppm
85 ppm
-13-
Solid Waste
Waste
25.8 ppm
<10 ppb
< 10 ppb
<10 ppb
79 ppb
< 10 ppb
< 10 ppb
< 10 ppb
"'0.1 ppm
< 0.1 ppm
< 0.1 ppm
3.46 ppm
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TOXICOiffiiCAL/c:HF1-1ICAL CHARACTERISTICS
LEAD
CAS RN: 7439921
mf: Pb; mw: 207.19
NIOSH #: OF 7525000
Bluish-gray, soft metal. mp: 327.43°, bp: 1740°, d: 11.34
@ 20°/4°. vap. press: 1 mm @ 973°.
SYNS:
C.l. 77575
LEAD FLAKE
TOXICITY DATA: 3
LEAD S2
OLOW (POLISH)
CODEN:
orl·rat TDLo!790 mglkg (MGN) AEHLAU 23,102,71
orl-rat TDLo: 1140 mglkg (14D pre-PHMCAA 20,201,78
210 post}
or1-mus TDLo: 1120 mglkg (MGN)
orl-mus TDLo:6300 mglkg (1-210
. preg)
AEHLAU 23,102,71
EXPEAM 31,1312,75
orl-mus TDLo:12600 mglkg (1-210 EXPEAM 31,1312,75
preg) .
or1~mus TDLo:4800.mglkg (1-16D
preg) . .
ivn-ham TDLo:5o mglkg!(8D
preg):TER .
orl-dom TDLo:662·mglkg (1-21W
preg)
ivn-ham TDLo:so mg/kg/(8D
preg):TER
or1-wmn TDLo:4SO mglkg/6Y=CNS
ipr-rat LDLo: 1000 mg/kg ·
orl-pgn LDLo: 160 mglkg
BECfA6 18,271,77
EXPEAM 25,56,69
TXAPA9 25,466,73
EXPEAM 25,56,69
JAMAAP 237,2627,77
EQSSDX 1,1,75
HBAMAK 4,1289,35
Carcinogeni~ Determination: Indefinite IARC** 23,
325,80.
TLV: AIR: 0.15 mglm3 DTLVS* 4,243,80; Toxicology
Review: TRBMA V 33(1),85,75; PGMJAO
51(601),783,75; JDSCAE 58(12),1767,75; IRXPAT
12~1,73; CfPHBG 55,147,71; CTOXAO 6(3),377,73;
QURBAW 7(1),75,74; RREVAH 54,55,75; JAVMA4
164(3),277,74; . AEMBAP . 40,239,73; CTOXAO
5(2),151,72; FOREAE 7,313,42; KOTTAM
11(11),1300,75; GEIGAI 20(3),291,73; STEVA8
2(4),341,74; CLCHAU 19,361,73; AJMEAZ 38,409,65;
85DHAX PB,254,72; PDTNBH 6,204,77; AMTODM
3,209,77. OSHA Standard: Air: TWA 200 uglm3
(SCP-O) FEREAC 39,23540,74. Occupational Expo­
sure to Inorganic Lead recm std: Air: TWA 0.10
mg(Pb)/m3 NTIS••. "NIOSH Manual of Analyt­
ical Methods, VOL 1 102,191,195,200,208,214,262,
VOL 3 S341. Reported in EPA TSCA Inventory,
1980.
THR: See lead compounds. A hmn CNS. HIGH orl;
MOD irr. A common air contaminant. It is a ± CAR
of the lungs and kidney and an exper TER.
Fire Hazard: Mod, in the form of dust when exposed
to heat or flame. See also powdered metals.
Explosion Hazard: Mod, in the form of dust when exposed
to heat or flame.
lncomp: NH,.N03. ClF3, H202, NaN3, Na2~. Zr. diso­
dium acetylide; oxidants.
Disaster Hazard: Dangerous; when heated, emits highly
tox fumes; can react vigorously with oxidizing materi­
als.
For further information see Vol. 1, No. 1 of DPIM Re­
port.
-14-
XYLENE
CAS RN: 1330207
~f: CsH1o; mw: 106.18
SYNS:
DIMETHYLBENZENE
KSYLEN (POLISH)
XILOLI (ITALIAN)
NIOSH #: ZE 2100000
XYLENEN (DUTCH)
XYLOL
XYLOLE (GERMAN)
TOXICITY DATA: 3-2-1 CODEN:
ihl·rat TCLo:JOOO mg/m3/24H TXCYAC 11,55,78
(9-14D preg)
eye·hmn 200 ppm JIHTAB 25,282,43
skn·rbt 100% MOD AMIHAB 14,387,56
skn·rbt 500 mg/24H MOD 28ZPAK ·-,24,72
eye-rbt 87 mg MLD AMIHAB 14,387,56
eye·rbt 5 mgi24H SEV 28ZPAK -,24,72
ihl-hrnn TCLo:200 pprn:IRR JIHTAB 25,282,43
ihl·man LCLo:1oooo ppm/6H BMJOAE 3,442,70
orl·rat LDS0:4300 mg/kg AMIHAB 14,387,56
ihl·rat LCso:sooo pprn/4H NPIRI* 1,123,74
scu-rat LDSO: 1700 mglkg NPIRI* 1,123,74
ipr-mus LDSO: 1570 uglkg AGGHAR 18,109,60
ipr·gpg LPLo:2ooo mglkg AIHAAP 35,21,74
ipr·rnam LDLo:2ooo mglkg AJHY A2 7,276,27
Aquatic Toxicity Rating: TLm96: 100-10 ppm WQCHM•
2,-,74. .
Tox~co/ogy Review: 27ZTAP 3,153,69. OSHA Standard:
Atr: T"W_ A 100 ppm (SCP-U) FEREAC 39,23540,74.
Occupational Exposure to Xylene recm std: Air: TWA
100 ppm; CL 200 ppm/10M NTIS**. "NIOSH Manual
of Analytical Methods, VOL 1 127, VOL 3 S31S. Re­
ported in EPA TSCA Inventory, 1980. EPA TSCA
8(a) Preliminary Assessment Informatioh Proposed
Rule FERREAC 45,13646,80.
THR: A hmn eye irr; A skn eye irr. A hmn IRR and
MOD ipr, scu, ihl; LOW orJ.
Disaster Hazard: When heated to decamp it emits acrid
· smoke and fumes.
Sax, N.I. Dangerous Properties of
Industrial Materials, 6th edition.
Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, NY, 1984.
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
BENZENE CHLORIDE
CAS RN: 108907
mf: CsHsCl; mw: 112.56
NIOSH #: CZ 0175000
Clear, colorless liquid. bp: 131.7°, Iel = 1.3%, uei =
7.1%, @ 150°, mp: -45°, flash p: 85°F (CC), d: 1.113
@-15.5°/15.5°, autoign. temp.: 1180°F, vap. press: 10
mm @ 22.2°, vap. d: 3.88.
SYNS:
CHLOORBENZEEN(DUTCH)
CHLORIIENZENE
CHLORIIENZOL
CHLOROBENZEN(PO~H)
CHLOROBENZENE
CLOROBENZENE (ITALIAN)
MONOCHLOORBENZEEN(DUTCH)
TOXICITY. DATA: 2-1
MONOCHLORBENZENE
MONOCHLORBENZOL(GERMAN)
MONOCHLOROBENZENE
MONOCLOROBENZENE (IT ALlAN)
NCI-c54886
PHENYL CHLORIDE
CODEN:
orl-rat LDS0:2910 mglkg 14CYAT 2,1334,63
ipr-rat LOLo:740() mglkg RMSRA6 16,449,1896
scu-rat LDLo=7000 mgJkg RMSRA6 16,449,1896
ihl-mus LCLo: 15 gmlm3 .GISAAA 20(8),19,55
orl-rbt LDS0:2830 mglkg 14CYAT 2,1394,63
ipr-gpg LOLo=4100 mglkg RMSRA6 16,449,1896
Aquatic Toxicity Rating: TLm96= 100-1 ppm WQCHM*
. 2,-,74.
TL V.· Air: 75 ppm DTL VS* 4,84,80. OSHA Standard:
Air: TWA 75 ppm (SCP-1) FEREAC 39,23540,74.
DOT: Flammable Liquid, Label: Flammable Liquid
FEREAC 41,57018,76. Currently Tested by NTP for
Carcinogenesis by Standard Bioassay Protocol as of
December 1980. "NIOSH Manual of Analytical Meth-1 •
ods .. VOL 2 S133. Reported in EPA TSCA Inventory,
1980. EPA TSCA8(a) Preliminary Assessment Infor­
mation Proposed Rule FERREAC 45,13646,80.
THR: MOD orl; LOW ipr, scu, ihl. Monochlorobenzol
is a fairly strong narcotic and possess~ only slight
irr qualities. For cats, cone .of 1,200 ppm are quite
narcotic, and cone of 3, 700 ppm are fatal after several
hours. The dichlorobenzols are strongly narcotic, l,'Ooo
ppm causing narcosis in guinea pigs followed by death
after 20 hrs exposure. Knowledge of the effects on man
of repeated exposure to subnarcotic concentrations is
meager. In general, it appears that the chlorobenzols
are not as toxic as benzol. Some of the symptoms de­
scribed (methemoglobinemia) suggest that other sub­
stances, _such as nitrobenzol, may have been partially
responsible for the few cases of industrial illness re­
ported. It is possible that prolonged exposure to chloro­
benzol may cause kidney and liver damage.
. Somnolence, loss of consciousness, twitchings of the ex­
tremities, cyanosis, deep, rapid respirations and a small,
irregular pulse are the chief symptoms occurring in
acute exposures. The urine may be burgundy red, and
the red blood cells show degenerative and regenerative
changes.
Fire Hazard: Dangerous, when exposed to heat or flame.
Also violept reaction with AgCl04, dimethyl sulfox­
ide.
Spontaneous Heating: No.
Explosion Hazard: Mod, when exposed to heat or flame .
.;_15-
Disaster Hazard: Dangerous; see chlorine compounds;
can react vigorously with oxidizing materials.
To Fight Fire: Foam, C02, dry chemical, water to-blanket
fire.
For further information see Chlorobenzene, Vol. 2, No.
4 of DPIM Report.
POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYL (AROCLOR
1254)
CAS RN: 11097691 NIOSH #: TQ 1360000
Composed of 11% tetra-, 49% penta-, 34% hexa-and
6% heptachlorobiphenyls (FCfXA V 12,63,74)
SYNS:
AROCHlOR 1254
AROCLOR 1254
CLORODIFENill, ClORO 54%
(ITALIAN)
CHLORIERTE BIPHENYL£, CHLOR•
GEHALT 54% (GERMAN)
CHLORODIPHENYL (54% Cl)
DIPHENYLE CHLORE, 54% DE
CHLORE (FRENCH)
NCI-c02664
TOXICITY DATA: 3
orl-rat TDLo: 188 mglkg (MGN)
orl-rat TDLo:645 mglkg (MGN)
orl-rat TOLo:90 mglkg (7-150 preg)
orl-rbt TDLo:350 mglkg (1-280 preg)
orl-rat TDLo:4 gm/kg/2Y-I:ETA
orl-nius TOLo: 17 gmlkgl
48W-C=NEO
CODEN:
FCTXAV 12,63,74
FCTXAV 12,63,74
FCTXAV 11,471,73
EVPHBI 1,67,71
NCITR• NCI-CG-TR-
38,78
JNCIAM 53,547,74
skn-mus TOLo:4 mglkg:ETA BECTA6 18,552,77
orl-rat LOso: 1295 mglkg · · FCTXA V 12,63,74
ivn-rat LDso:358 mglkg FCTXA V 12,63,74
ipr-mus L050=2840 mglkg BECTA6 8,245,72
Cai-cinogenic Determination: Human Suspected IARC,...
18,43,78.
TLV: Air: 0.5 mg/m3 DTLVS* 4,89,80. Toxicology Re­
view: EVHPAZ 1,105,72; . ARVPAX 14,139,74;
RREVAH 44,1,73; STEVA8 2(4),305,74; BISNAS
20,958, 70. OSHA Standard: Air: TWA 500 ug/m3
(skin) (SCP-1) FEREAC 39,23540,74. Occupational
Exposure to Polychlorinated Biphenyls recm std: Air:
TWA 1.0 ug/m3 NTIS**. NCI Carcinogenesis Bioas­
say Completed; Results Indefinite: Rat (NCITR * NCI­
CG-TR-38,78). ••NIOSH Manual of Analytical Meth­
ods" Vol. 2 S121.
THR: An exper ETA, NEO. A susp hmn CARC. HIGH
ivn; MOD orl, ipr. See also PCB's .
Disaster Hazard: When heated to decomp it emits tox
fumes of cJ-_
For further information see Chlorinated Diphenyls, Vol.
1, No. 3 of DPIM Report.
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
METHANE DICHLORIDE
CAS RN: 75092 NIOSH #: PA 8050000
mf: CH2Cb; mw: 84.93
Coloriess volatile liquid. bp: 39.8°, lei = 15.5% in 0 2,
uel = 66.4% in 02. fp: -96.7°, d: 1.326 @ 20°/4°,
autoign. temp.: 1139°F, vap. press: 380 mm @ 22°, vap. '
d: 2.93.
SYNS:
CHLORURE DE METHYLENE
(FRENCH)
DICHLOROMETHANE (DOT)
FREON 30
METHYLENE CHLORIDE (DOT)
METHYLENE DICHLORIDE
METYLENU CHLOREK (POLISH)
NCI-c50102
METHYLENE BICHLORIDE
TOXICITY DATA:
skn-rbt 810 mg/24H SEV
eye-rbt 162 mg MOD
eye-rbt 10 mg MLD
eye-rbt 17500 mglm3/10M
mmo-sat 5700 ppm
mma-sat 5700 ppm
dni-bmn:tbr 5000 ppm/lH·C
dni-ham=1ng 5000 ppm/lH..C
sce-bam:1ng 5000 ppm/IH..C
3
ih1-rat TCLo:4500 ppm/24H (1-170
preg)
ihl-rat TCLo=.1250 ppm/7H (6-150
preg)
ihl-mus TCLo:1250 ppm/7H (6-150
preg)
ihl-rat TCLo=500 ppmi6HJ2Y:ETA
ihl-hmn TCLo=500 ppm/1Y-I:CNS
ihl-hmn TCLo=500 ppm/8H:BLD
or1-rat LD5o: 167 mglkg
ihl-rat LCS0:88000 mglm3/30M
ihl-mus LC5o: 14400 ppmnH
ipr-mus LDso: 1500 mglkg
scu-mus LD50=6460 mglkg
orl-dog LDLo=3000 mglkg
ihl-dog LCLo: 14108 ppmnH
ipr-dog LDLo=950 mglkg
scu-dog LDLo=2700 mglkg
ivn-dog-LDLo=200 mglkg
ihl-cat LCLo=43400 mg!m3/4.5H
orl-rab LDLo: 1900 mglkg
scu-rbt LDLo=2700 mglkg
ihl-gpg LCLo=5ooo ppmnH
CODEN:
JETOAS 9,171,76
JETOAS 9,171,76
TXCYAC 6,173,76
TXCYAC 6,173,76
MUREA V 56,245,78
MUREA V 56,245,78
MUREAV 81,203,81
MUREAV 81,203,81
MUREAV 81,203,81
TXAPA9 52,29,80
TXAPA9 32,84,75
TXAPA9 32,84,75
TXAPA9 48,A185,79
ABHY AE 43,1123,68
SCIEAS 176,295,72 oowso• 1n6n6
FAVUAI 7,35,75.
NIHBAZ 191,1,49
TXAPA9 9,139,66
TXAPA9 4,354,62
QJPPAL 7,205,34
NIHBAZ 191,1,49
TXAPA9 10,119,67
QJPPAL 7,205,34
QJPPAL 7,205,34
AHBAAM 116,131,36
HBTXAC 1,94,56
QJPPAL 7,205,34
FLCRAP 1,197,67
-16-•
Aquatic Toxicity Rating: TLm96= 1000:).00 ppm
WQCHM* 3,-,74. Carcinogenic Determination: Indefi­
nite IARC** 20,449,79.
TLV: Air: 100 ppm DTLVS* 4,275,80. Toxicology Re­
view: FAZMAE 18,365,74; 27ZTAP 3,94,69. OSHA
Standard: Air: TWA 500 ppm; CL 1000; Pk 2000/5M/
2H (SCP-J) FEREAC 39,23540,74. DOT-ORM-A,
Label: None FEREAC 41,57018,76. Occupational Ex­
posure to Methylene Chloride recm std: Air: TWA 75
ppm; Pk 500 ppm/15M NTIS**. Currently tested by
NTP for Carcinogenesis by Standard Bioassay Protocol
as of December 1980. "NIOSH Manual of Analytical·
Methods'' Vol 1 127, Vol 3 S329. Reported in EPA
TSCA Inventory, 1980. EPA TSCA 8(a) Preliminary
Assessment Information Proposed Rule FERREAC
45,13646,80.
THR: MUT data. A skn, eye irr. An exper ETA, ±
CARC. A hmn CNS, BLD. HIGH orl, ivn; MOD
ipr, orl, scu, ihl; LOW ihl, scu. See also chlorinated
aliphatic hydrocarbons. Very dangerous to the eyes.
Except for its property of inducing narcosis, it has very
few other acute toxicity effects. Its narcotic powers
are quite strong, and in view of its great volatility,
care should be taken in its use. It will not form explosive
mixtureS with air at ordinary temp. However, it can
be decomp by contact with hot surfaces and or)en flame,
and it can then yield toxic fumes, which are irr and
will thus give warning of their pr~ence. It has been
used as an anesthetic in Europe lind is still used there
for local anesthesia. Exper have sltown that 25,000 ppm
cone for. 2 hr exposures were not leth;~. Cone of 7,200
ppm after 8 min caused paresthesia of the extremities;
after 16 min, acceleration of the pulse to 100; during
the first 20 min, congestion in the head, a sense of
heat and slight irr of the eyes. At a level of 2,300
ppm, ihere was no feeling of dizziness during 1-hr
exposures, but nausea did occur after 30 min of ex­
posure. The limit of perception by smell is set at 25-
50 ppm cone. Can cause a dermatitis upon prolonged
skin contact. · A respirator for organic vapors and
fumes should be worn to avoid excessive inhal. Used
aS a food additive permitted in food for human con­
sumption:
Fire Hazard: Reacts violently with Li, NaK, potassium­
tert-butoxide, (KOH + n-methyl-n-nitrosourea).
Explosion Hazard: None under ordinary conditions, but
will form explosive mixtures in atmosphere having high
oxygen content, in liquid 02, N20•, K, Na, NaK.
Disaster Hazard: Dangerous; when heated to decomp,
emits highly tox fumes of phosgene.
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CAS RN: 127184 NIOSH #: KX 3850000
mf: ~Cl4; mw: 165.82
Colorless liquid, chloroform-like odor. mp: -23.35°, bp:
121.20°, flash p: none, d: 1.6311 @ 15°/4°, vap. press:
15.8 mm @ 22°, vap. d: 5.83.
SYNS:
CARBON BICHLORIDE
CARBON DICHLORIDE
.cirEROCHLOROETYLEN (POLISH)
DOW-PER
ETHYLENE TETRACHLORIDE
NCJ-c04580
PERCHLOORETHYLEEN, PER
(DUTCH)
PERCHLORAETHYLEN, PER (GER•
MAN)
TOXICITY DATA: 3
PERCHLORETHYLENE, PER
(FRENCH)
PERCHLOROETHYLENE
PERCLENE
PERCLOROETILENE (ITALIAN)
TETRACHLOORETHEEN(DUTCH)
TETRACHLORAETHEN (GERMAN)
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE (DoT)
TETRACLOROETENE (ITALIAN)
CODEN:
APT009 19,A21,80 ihl-rat TCLo: 1000 ppm/24H (140
pre/1-220 preg)
ihl-rat TCLo: 1000 ppm/24H (1-220 • APTOD9 19,A21,80 .· preg) .
. ihl-rat TCLo:90Q ppm/7H (7-130 r -preg) -•
:·ihl-rat TCLo:300 ppm/7H (6-150
·, preg)
ihl-mus TCLo:3oo ppm/7H (6-150
preg)
skn-rbt 810 mg124H SEV
eye-rbt 162 mg MLO
mmo-sat SO uUplate
mma-sat 200 uUplate
or1-mus TDLo:195 gm/kg/SOW­
I:CAR
orl-mus TD:240 gm!kg/62W-I:CAR
ihl-hmn TCLo=96 ppmf7H:sys
ihl-man TCLo:280 ppm/2H=EYE
ih1-man TCLo:60Q ppm/10M:CNs
orl-rat LDS0:88SO mg/kg
ih1-rat LCLo:400Q ppm/4H
orl-mus LOS0=8100 mg/kg
ih1-mus LCLo:2Jooo mg/m3nH
ipr-mus LOS0:4700 mg/kg
orl-dog LDLo:400Q mg!kg
ipr-dog LDS0=2100 mg/kg
ivn-ilog LDLo:8s mg/kg
orl-cat LDLo:400Q mg/kg
orl-rbt LDLo:SOOO mg/kg
scu-rbt LDLo:noo mg/kg
TJADAB 19,41A,79
TXAPA9 32,84,75
TXAPA9 32,84,75
JETOAS 9,171;76
JETOAS 9,171,76
NIOSH• SAUG77
NIOSH• SAUG77
NCITR• NCI-CG-TR-
13,77
NCITR• NCI-CG-TR-
13,77
NTIS .. PB257-185
AMIHBC 5,566,52
AMIHBC 5,566,52
NPIRI• 1,96,74
JOCMA7 4,262,62
NTIS•• PB257-185
AHBAAM 116,131,36
NTIS .. PB257-185
AJHY A2 9,430,29
TXAPA9 10,119,67
QJPPAL 7,205,34
AJHY A2 9,430,29
AJHY A2 9,430,29
QJPPAL 7,205,34
Aquatic Toxicity Rating: TLm96: 100-10 ppm WQCHM•
3,-,74. Carcinogenic Determination: Animal Positive
IARC .. 20,49i,79.
TL V: Air: 50 ppm (skin) DTLVS• 4,325,80. Toxicology
Review: AJMEAZ 38,409,65; 27ZTAP 3,139,69.
OSHA Standard: Air: TWA 100 ppm; CL 200; Pk
300/5M/3H (SCP-J) FEREAC 39,23540,74. DOT:
ORM-A, Label: None FER~AC 41,57018,76. Occupa­
tional Exposure to Tetrachloroethylene recm std: Air:
TWA 50 ppm;'CL 100 ppm/15M NTIS ... NCI Carci­
nogenesis Bioassay Completed; Results Positive: Mouse
(NCITR• NCI-CG-TR-13,77). NCI Carcinogenesis
Bioassay Completed; Results Negative: Rat (NCITR •
NCI-CG-TR-13, 77). Currently Tested by NTP for Car­
cinogenesis by Standard Bioassay Protocol as ofDe­
cember 1980."NIOSH'Manual of Analytical Methods"
VOL 1 127, VOL 3 S335. NIOSH Current Intelligence
Bulletin 20, 1978. Reported in EPA TSCA Inventory,
1980. EPA TSCA 8E No: 05780146-Followup Sent
as of April, 1979. . -17-
THR: MOD via inhal, oral, scu, ipr and dermal routes.
HIGH via ivn route. _Not corrosive or dangerously
acutely reactive, but toxic by inhal, by prolonged or
reJ)eated contact with the skin or inu meni-;--or when
ingested by mouth. The liquid can cause injuries to
the eyes; however, with proper precautions it can be
handled safely. The symptoms of acute intoxication
from this material are the result of its effects upon
the nervous system.
Exposures to higher cone than 200 ppm cause irr,
lachrymation and burning of the eyes and irr of the
nose and throat. There may be vomiting, nausea, drow­
siness, an attitude of irresponsibility, and even an ap­
pearance resembling alcoholic intoxication. This mate­
rial also acts as an anesthetic, through the inhalation
of excessive amounts within a short time. The symp-·
toms of fatal intoxication are ·irritation of the eyes,
nose and throat, then fullness in the head, mental confu­
sion; there may be headache stupefaction, nausea and
vomiting, personnel suffering from subacute poisoning
may suffer from such symptoms as headache, fatigue, ·
nausea, vomiting, mental confusion and temporary
blurring of the vision. This can occur when inadequate
ventilation results in concentrations higher than 200
ppm, or where the vapor cone are intermittently high
due to faulty handling of the material, or when an
individual fails to take adequate precautionary mea­
sures.
This material can cause dermatitis, particularly after
repeated or prolonged contact with the skin. The der­
matitis is preceded by a reddening and burning and
more rarely, a blistering of the skin. In any event, the
skin becomes rough and dry, due largely to the removal
of skin oils by material. The skin then cracks easily
and is readily susceptible to infection. Upon ingestion
it causes irr of the gastrointestinal tract, which, in tum,
causes nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and bloody stools.
However, such effects are usually less severe than the
effects of swallowing similar amounts of other chlori­
nated hydrocarbons. An exper CARC. MUT data.
It may be handled in the presence or absence of
air, water, and tight with any of the common construc­
tion materials at temp. up to l40°C. This material is
extremely stable and resists hydrolysis. A common air ,
contaminant. Reacts violently with Ba, Be, Li; N204; ·
metals; NaOH.
Disaster Hazard: Dangerous; when heated to decamp it
emits high tox fumes of chlorides.
For further information see Perchloroethylene Yol. 1, No. ,
2 of DPIM Report.
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ETHYL BENZENE
CAS RN: 100414 NIOSH #: DA 0700000
mf: C8H10; mw: 106.18
Colorless liquid, aromatic odor. Mise in alcohol and ether,
insol in NH3; sol in S02• bp: 136.2°, fp: -94.9°, flash
p: 59°F, d: 0.8669-@ 20°/4°, autoign. temp.: 810°F,
vap. press: 10 mm @ 25.9°, vap. d: 3.66, lei = 1.2%,
uel = 6.8%.
SYNS:
AETHYLBENZOL(GERMAN)
ETHYLBENZEEN(DUTCH)
ETHYLBENZOL
ETILBENZENE (ITALIAN)
ETYLOBENZEN(POL~H)
NCJ-c56393
PHENYLETHANE
TOXICITY DATA:
skn-rbt 15 mg/24H open MLD
eye-rbt 100 mg
2-1
ihl-rat TCLo=97 ppm/7H (lSD preg)
ihl-rat TCLo!985 ppm/7H (1-190
preg)
ihl-rat TCLo:96 ppm/7H (1-190 preg)
ihl-rbt TCLo:99 ppm/7H (1-181) preg)
ihl-hmn TCLo=100 ppm/8H
TFX:IRR
CODEN:
AIHAAP 23,95,62
AJOPAA 29,1363,46
BATIL• JAN,81
BATIL• JAN,81
• BATIL· JAN,81
BATIL• JAN,81
AIHAAP 31,206,70
orl-rat LDS0:3SQO mglkg AMIHAB 14,387,56
ihl-rat LCL0:40()() ppm/4H AIHAAP 23,95,62
skn-rbt LDSO:SOQO mglkg FCI'XAV 13,681,75
ihl-gpg LCLo=10000 ppm PHRPA6 45,1241,30
Aquatic Toxicity Rating: TLm96: 100-10 ppm WQCHM•
2,-,74.
TLV: Air: 100 ppm DTLVS• 4,176,80. OSHA Standard:
Air: TWA 100 ppm (skin) (SCP-C) FEREAC 39,
23540,74. DOT: Flammable Liquid, Label: Flammable
Liquid FEREAC 41,57018,76. Selected by NTP Carci­
nogenesiS Bioassay as of December 1980. "NIOSH
Manual of Analytical Methods" VOL 2 829. Reported
in EPA TSCA Inventory, 1980. EPA TSCA 8(a) Pre-.
liminary Assessment Information Proposed Rule
FERREAC 45,13646,80.
THR: MOD via irr to skn, eyes, mu mem and via oral
and inhal routes. The liquid is an irr to the skn and
mu mem. A cone of 0.1% of the vapor in air is an
irr to the eyes ofhmns, and a cone of0.2% is extremely
irr at first, then causes dizziness, irr of the nose and
throat and a sense of constriction of the chest. Exposure
of guinea pigs to 1% cone bas been reported as ~using
ataxia, loss .of consciousness, tremor of the extremities
and finally death through respiratory failure. The
pathological findings were congestion of the brain and
lungs, with edema. No data are available regarding
the effect of chronic exposure. An exper TER.
Erythema and inflammation of the skin may result
from contact of the skn With the liquid. Exposure to
the vapor causes lachrymation and irr of the nose and
throat, dizziness, and a sense of constriction of the
chest. The irr properties are sufficient to cause worl,c-
' ers to leave an atmosphere containing 0.5% of the va­
por.
Fire Hazard: Dangerous, when exposed to heat or flame;
can react vigorously with oxidizing materials.
Spontaneous Heating: No.
Disaster Hazard: Dangerous; keep away from beat and
open flame.
To Fight Fire: Foam, C02, dry chemical.
For further information see Vol. 2, No. 6 of DPIM Re--18-
port.
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE
CAS RN: 117817 NIOSH #: TI 0350000
mf: 4.H380 4; mw: 390.62
SYNS:
BIS(2-ETHYLhEXYL)-1,2-BEN-DOP
ZENEDICARBOXYLATE
01(2-ETHYLHEXYL)oRTHQ-
2-ETHYLHEXYL PHTHALATE
NCJ.C52733
. PHTHALATE
D1(2~ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALA TE
DI-SEC-o<:TYL PHTHALATE.
OCTOIL
TOXICITY DATA: 3-2-1
skn-rbt 500 mg/24H MLO
eye-rbt 500 mg
eye-rbt 500 mg/24H MLD
ipr-rat TDLo=30 gmlkg/(5-150
preg):TER
orl-mus TDLo=7500 mg/kg/(80
preg):TER
orl-man TDLo: 143 mglkg:GJT
orl-rat L050=31 gmlkg
ipr-rat L050=30700 mglkg
ivn-rat LD50=250 mglkg
unk-rat LD50=37000 mglkg
orl-mus LD50=30 gm/kg
ipr-mus LOSO: 14 gmlkg
unk-mus LD50=37000 mg!kg
orl-rbt LDS0:34 gmlkg
skn-rbt LD50=25 gmlkg
skn-gpg LDSO: 10 gmlkg
unk-gpg LD50!37000 mg!kg
ihl-mam LC50=30000 mglm3
orl-rat TDLo=35 mglkg (140 male/
140 pre)
orl-rat TOLo:840Q uglkg (70 male)
orl-rat TOLo=l7200 mglkg (MGN)
orl-rat TOLo=43 gmlkg (MGN)
ipr-rat TDLo: 10 gm/kg (5-150 preg)
ipr-rat TDLo=S gm/kg (5-150 preg) ·
orl-mus TOLo: 1 gm/kg (70 preg)
orl-mus TOLo: 1260 mg!kg (1-180
..-preg)
orl-mus TOLo=3420 mglkg (1-180
preg)
orl-mus TOLo=7200 mg!kg (1-180
preg)
CODEN:
28ZPAK -,48,72
AJOPAA 29,1363,46
28ZPAK -,48,72
JPMSAE 61,51,72
TJADAB 14,259,76
JIHTAB 27,130,45
UCOS .. 1n0161
JIHTAB 27,130,45
TXAPA9 45,230,78
GTPZAB 24(3),25,80
TJADAB 14,259,76
JPMSAE 55,158,66
GTPZAB 24(3),25,80
EVHPAZ 4,3,73
JIHTAB 27,130,45
EVHPAZ 4,3,73
GTPZAB 24(3),25,80
GTPZAB 24(3),25,80
FCTXAV 15,389,77
TXAPA9 53,35,80
NEZAAQ 31,507,76
NEZAAQ 31,507,76
JPMSAE 61,51,72
JPMSAE 61,51,72
JEPTDQ 4,533,80
ENVRAL 22,245,80
ENVRAL 22,245,80
ENVRAL 22,245,80
TLV: Air: 5 mg/m3 DTLVS• 4,159,80. Toxicology Re­
view: EVHPAZ (3),73,73; RREVAH 54,1,75;
JOCMA7 15(10),808,73; CMIVAS 10(3)~9,73; I
ESKHA5 93,1,75; TXAPA9 45,1,78 .. 0SHA Standard:
Air: TWA 5 mg/m3 (SCP-O) FEREAC 39,23540,74.
NTP Carcinogenesis Bioassay Completed as of Decem­
ber 1980. "NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods"
Vol 1 840. Reported in EPA TSCA Inventory, 1980.
EPA TSCA 8(a) Preliminary 'Assessment Information
Proposed Rule FERREAC 45,13646,80.
THR: An exper TER, GIT (man). Possible hmn CARC.
HIGH ivn; LOW orl, ipr, unk, skn; MLD skn, eye
irr.
Disaster Hazard: When heated to decomp it emits acrid
smoke.
For further information see Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate,
Vol. 1, No. 7 and Vol. 2, No. 2 of DPIM Report.
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-1
0-DICHLOROBENZENE
CAS RN: 955501 NIOSH #: CZ 4500000
mf: C;H4Cl2; mw: 147.00
Clear liquid. mp: -17.5°, bp: 180°-183°, fp: -22°, flash
p: 151 °F, d: 1.307 @ 20°/20°, vap. d: 5.05, autoign.
temp.: 1198°F,"lel = 2.2%, uel = 9.2%.
SYNS:
o-DICHLOR BENZOL
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
TOXICITY DATA:
eye-rbt 100 mgi30S rns MLD
orl-rat LDSO:soo mglkg
ihl-rat LCLo:821 ppm/1H
ipr-rat LDS0:84Q mglkg
ivn-mus LDLo:40Q mglkg
or1-rbt mso:soo mglkg
ivn-rbt LDLo:2SO mg/kg
or1-gpg LDLo:2ooo mglkg
ihl-gpg LCLo:8oo ppm.!24H
2
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
NCI-<:54944
CODEN:
AMIHAB 17,180,58
WRPCA2 7,135,68
AMIHAB 17,180,58
MEPAAX 20,519,69"
JPBAA7 44,281,37
8SARAE 3,32,76
JPBAA7 44,281,37
14CYAT 2.1336,63
JPBAA7 44,281,37
Carcinogenic Determination: Indefinite IARC•• 7,
231,74.
TLV: Air: 50 ppm DTLVS* 3,76,71. Toxicology Review:
27z:fAP 3,49,69. OSHA Standard: Air: CL 50 ppm
(SCP-J) FEREAC 39,23540,74. DOT: ORM-A, Label:
NonoFEREAC41,57018,76. Currently Tested by NTP
for Carcinogenesis by Standard Bioassay Protocol as
of December 1980. "NIOSH Manual of Analytical
Methods"VOL3 S13S. Reported in EPA TSCAinven­
tory, 1980. EPA TSCA 8(a) Preliminary Assessment
Information Proposed Rule FERREAC 45,13646,80.
THR: MOD via inhal and oral routes. See chlorobenzene.
The o-~omer is probably more toxic than the m-or
p-forms. It is irr to skn and mu mem. Exper produced
liver and kidney injury. An exper ± CARC. An eye
irr.
Fire Hazard: Mod, when exposed to heat or flame.
Disaster Hazard: Dangerous; see chloride; can react vigor­
ously with oxidizing materials.
To Fight Fire: Water, foam, C02 dry chemical.
Incomp: aluminium.
-19-
P-DICHLOROBENZENE
CAS RN: 106467 NI.OSH #.:... CZ 4550000
mf: C;H4Cl2; mw: 147.00
White crystals, penetrating odor. mp: 53°, bp: 173.4°,
flash p: 150°F (CC), d: 1.4581 @ 20.5°/4°, vap. press:
10 mm@ 54.8°, vap. d: 5.08. ,
SYNS:
1,4-DICHLOORBENZEEN (DUTCH) 1,4-DICLOROBENZENE (ITALIAN)
P-DICHLORBENZOL (GERMAN) NCI-<:54955
P-DICHLOROBENZOL PARADICHLOROBENZOL
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
TOXICITY DATA:
eye-hmn 80 ppm·
mmo-asn 200 mg!L
3
orl-hmn TDLo:3oo mg/kg:SYS
un1c-man LDLo:221 mg/kg
orl-rat mso:soo mg/kg
ipr-rat LDS0:2S62 mg/kg
orl-mus LD50:29SO mg/kg
scu-mus LD50!5145 mg/kg
orl-gpg LDLo:2800 __mg!kg
CODEN:
AMIHAB 14,138,56
CJMIAZ 16,369,70 PCOC•• -,851,66
85DCAI 2. 73,70
WRPCA2 9,119,70
JAPMA8 38,124,49
GUCHAZ 6,183,73
TOIZAG 20(5/6),772,73
14CYAT 2,1338,63
Carcinogenic Determination: Indefinite IARC.. 7,
231,74.
TLV.· Air: 75 ppm DTLVS* 4,126,80 .. Toxicology Review:
31ZNAA 1(1),93,71; 27z:fAP 3,49,69. OSHA Stan­
dard: Air: TWA 75 ppm (SCP-T) FEREAC 39,
23540,74. DOT: ORM-A, Label: None FEREAC
41,57018,76. Currently Tested by NTP for Carcinogen­
esis by Standard Bioassay Protocol as of December
1980. "NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods" VOL
3 S281. Reported in EPA TSCA Inventory, 1980. EPA
TSCA 8(a) Preliminary Assessment Information Pro­
posed Rule FERREAC 45,13646,80.
THR: MOD via ipr and inhal; HIGH oral. An insecticide.
Has been reported to cause liver injury in hmns. An
exper CARC. MUT data.
Fire Hazard: Mod, when exposed to heat, flame or oxidiz­
ers.
Spontaneous Heating: No.
Disaster Hazard: Dangerous; see chlorides; can react vig­
orously with oxidizing materials.
To Fight Fire: Water, foam, C02, dry chemical.
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TOLUENE
CAS RN: 108883
mf;C7Hs; mw: 92.15
NIOSH #: XS 5250000 ,
Colorless liquid, benzol-like odor. Flammable. mp: -95°
to -94.5°, bp: 110.4 °, flash p: 40°F (CC), ulc: 75-80,
lei = 1.27%, uel = 7%, d: 0.866 @ 20°/4°, autoign.
temp.: 896°F, vap. press: 36.7 mm @ 30°, vap. d: 3.14.
Insol in water; sol in acetone; mise in absolute ale, ether,
chloroform.
SYNS:
METHYLBENZENE
METHYLBENZOL •
NCI<07272
PHENYLMETHANE
TOLUEEN (DUTCH)
TOLUEN (CZECH)
TOLUOL
TOLUOLO (ITALIAN)
TOXICITY DATA: 3
cyt-rat-scu 12 gmlkgii2D-I
ihl-rat TCLo: 1500 mg!m3/24H (1-80
pre g)
CODEN:
GTPZAB 17(3),24,73
TXCYAC 11,55,78
ihl-rat TCI.o: 1000 mglm3/24H (7-• FMORAO 28,286,80
140 preg)
orl-mus TDLo:9 gmlkg (6-IS.D preg)
orl-mus TDLo: IS gm/kg (6-150 preg)
orl-mus TDLo:3o gmlkg (6-150 preg)
ihl-mus TCLo:5oo mglm3/24H (6-
130 preg)
TJAOAB I9,41A,79
TJADAB 19,41A,79
TJADAB 19,41A,79
TXCY AC ll,SS,78
unk-rat LDS0:6900 mglkg GISAAA 45(12),64,80
· unk-mus LOS0:2000 mglkg GISAAA 45(12),64,80
eye-hmn 300 ppm JIHTAB 25,282,43
skn-rbt 435 mg MLD UCOS .. 7/23nO
eye-rbt 870 ug MLO UCDS .. 7/23nO
eye-rbt 2 mgi24H SEV 28ZPAK -,23,72
cyt-rat-ihl 610 mg!m3/16W-I GISAAA 42(1),32,77
ihJ-hmn TCLo:200 ppm:CNS JAMAAP 123,1106,43
ihl-man TCLo:too ppm:PSY WEHSAL 9,131,72
orl-rat LD50:sooo mglkg AMIHAB 19,403,59
ihl-rat LCLo:40QO ppm/4H AIHAAP 30,470,69
ipr-rat LDLo=800 mglkg TXAPA9 1,156,59
ihl-mus LCS0:5320 ppm/8H JIHTAB 25,366,43
ipr-mus LOS0:1120 uglkg AGGHAR 18,109,60
skn-rbt LDSQ: 14 gmlkg UCDS .. 7/23nO
scu-frg LDLo:920 mglkg AEPPAE 130,250,28
Aquatic Toxicity Rating: TLm96: 100-10 ppm WQCHM*
4,-,74.
TLV: Air: 100 ppm DTLVS* 4,400,80. Toxicology Re­
view: AEHLAU 22,373,71; CTOXAO 11(5),549,77;
FNSCA6 2,67,73; MUREAV 47(2),75,78; CTOXAO
11(5),549,77; 27ZTAP 3,144,69. OSHA Standard: Air:
TWA 200 ppm; CL 300; Pk 500/lOM (SCP-V)
FEREAC -39,235~,74~ DOT: Flammable Liquid, La­
bel: Flammable Liquid FEREAC41,57018,76. Occupa­
tional Exposure to Toluene recm std: Air: TWA 100
ppm; CL 200 ppm/10M NTis••. Currently Tested by
NTP for Carcinogenesis by Standard Bioassay Protocol
as of December 1980. Reselected by NTP Carcinogen­
esis Bioassay as of December 1980 ... NIOSH Manual
of Analytical Methods" VOL 1 127, VOL 3 S343. Re­
ported in-EPA TSCA Inventory, 1980. EPA TSCA
&(a) Preliminary Assessment Information Proposed
-20-
Rule FERREAC 45,13646,80. EPA TSCA 8E No.
02780079P-Followup Sent as of April,"1979.
THR: MUT data. A skn, eye irr. A hmn CNS, PSY.
MOD ihl, ipr, scu; HIGH ipr; LOW orl, skn. Toluene
is derived from coal tar, and commercial grades usually
contain small amounts ofbenzene as an impurity. Acute
poisoning, resulting from exposures to high cone of
the vapors. are rare with toluene. Inhal of 200 ppm
of toluene for 8 hrs may cause impairment of coordina­
tion and reaction time; with higher cone (up to 800
ppm) these effects are increased and are observed in
a shorter time. In the few cases of acute toluene poison­
ing reported, the effect lias been that of a narcotic,
the workman passing through a stage of intoxication
into one of coma. Recovery following removal from
exposure has been the rule. An occasional report of
chronic poiSoning describes an anemia and leucopenia,
with biopsy showing a bone marrow hypoplasia. These
effects, however, are less common in people working
with toluene, and they are not as severe.
Exposure to cone up to 200 ppm produces few symp­
toms. At 200-500 ppm, headache, nausea, eye irr, loss
of appetite, a bad taste, lassitude, impairment of coordi­
nation and reaction time are reported, but are not usu­
ally accompanied by any laboratory or physical findings
of significance. With higher cone, the above complaints
are increased and in addition, anemia, leucopenia and
enlarged liver may be found in rare cases.
A common air contaminant. ·
Fire Hazard: Slight, when exposed to heat, flame or oxi-
dizers.
Explosion Hazard: Mod, when exposed to flame or re­
acted with (H:z804 + HN03), N204, AgClO,, BrF1.
UF6.
Disaster Hazard: Mod dangerous; when heated it emits
irr fumes; can react vigorously with oxidizing materials.
To Fight Fire: Foam, C02, dry chemical.
For further information see Vol. 2, No. 1 of DPIM Report.
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRICHLORO ETHYLENE
CAS RN: 79-01-6 NIOSH #: KX 4550000
mf: ~HCh; mw: 131.38
Mobile liquid; characteristic odor of chloroform. d: 1.4649
@ 20°/4°; bp: 86.7°; flash p: 89.6°F; lei= 12.5%; uel
= 90% @ above 30°; mp: -73°; fp: -86.8°; autoign.
temp.: 788°F; vap. press: 100 mm @ 32°; vap. d: 4.53. ·
SYNS:
ACElYLENE TRICHLORIDE
1-cHLOR0'-2,2-DICHLOROETH-
YLENE
1,1-DJCHLORo-2-cHLOROETH­
YLENE
DOW-TRI
ETHYLENE TRICHLORIDE
NCJ-co4546
TRICHLOORETHEEN (DUTCH)
TRICHLORAETHEN (OERMAN)
TRI.CLENE
TRICLORETENE (ITALIAN)
VESTROL
SKIN AND EYE IRRITATION
DATA: 3 CODEN:
eye-hmn 5 ppm
skn-rbt 500 mg/24H SEV
eye-rbt 20 mg/24HSEV .
MUTATION DATA:
mmo-sat 100 ul../plate
mma-sat 5 pph/2H
mma-smc 10 ml.IL
slt-mus-ipr I mmoVL
dns-muso.Orl 2500 mg!L
dns-mus=bmr I mmoVL
hrna-mus/smc 400 mglkg
REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS
DATA:
ihl-rat TCLo: 1800 ppm/24H (1-20
preg)
ihl-rat TCLo: 100 ppm/4H (6-220
preg) •
ihl-rat TCLo: 1800 ppm/6H (1-200
preg)
TUMORGENIC DATA:
ihl-rat Tcto:5oo ppm/6H/77W­
I:ETA
JOCMA7 2,383,60
28ZPAK -,28,72
28ZPAK -,28,72
CODEN:
NIOSH• 5AUG77
ARTOON 41,249,79
MUREAV 48,173,77
MUREA V 46,202,77
NTIS•• AO-AOS0-636
NTIS•• AO-A080-636
JEPTDQ 1,411,78
CODEN:
APT009 19,A22,80
JPHYA7 276,24P,78
TXCYAC 14,153,79
CODEN:
ARTOON 43,237,80
orl-mus IDLo:455 glkg!78W-I:CAR
ihl-mus TCLo!JOO ppm/6H/
77W-I:ETA
NCITR• .NCI-CG-TR-2,76
ARTOON 43,237,80
ihl-ham TCLo:1oo ppm/6H/
77W-I:ETA
orl-mus T0:9J2 g/icg!78W-I:CAR
iht-mus TC:5oo ppm/6H/77W-I:ETA
TOXICITY DATA:
orl-hmn LOLo:7 glkg
ihl-hmn TCLo:69()() mg/Ms/
10M:CNS
ihl-hmn TCLo: 160 ppm/83M:CNS
ihl-hmn TOLo=812 mglkg:SYS
ihl-man TCLo:uo ppm/8H:IRR
ihl-man LCLo:2900 ppm
orl-rat L050:4920 mglkg
ihl-rat Lcto:8ooo ppm/4H
orl-mus L050=2402 mglkg
ihl-mus LCLo=3000 ppm/2H
ipr-mus L050=3000 mglkg
ivn-mus L050=34 mglkg
orl-dog LOLo=5860 mglkg
ipr-dog LOSO: 1900 mglkg
scu-dog LOLo: 150 mglkg
ivn-dog LOLo: 150 mglkg
orl-cat LOLo:5866 mglkg
ihl-cat LCLo:32500 mg/M3/2H
orl-rbt LOLo:7330 mglkg
scu-rbt LOLo=1800 mglkg
ihl-gpg LCLo:37200 ppm/40M
ARTOON 43,237,80
NCITR• NCI-CG-TR-2,76
ARTOON 43,237,80
CODEN:
ARTOON 35,295,76
AHBAAM 116,131,36
AIHAAP 23,167,62
BMJOAE 2,689,45
BJIMAG 28,293,71
NZMJAX 50,119,51
AIHAAP 30,470,69
AIHAAP 30,470,69
NTis•• AO-A080-636
AEPPAE 141,19,29
JETOAS 7(4),247,74
CBCCT• 6,141,54
12VXA5 8,1069,68
TXAPA9 10,119,67
HBTXAC 5,76,59
QJPPAL 7,205,34
NBTXAC 5,76,59
AMBAAM 116,131,36
HBTXAC 5,76,59
QJPPAL 7,205,34
HBTXAC 5,76,59
--21-
Aquatic Toxicity Rating:TLm96: 1000-100 ppm
WQCHM* 3,-,74. Carcinogenic Determination: Ani­
mal Positive IARC** 20,545,79; IARC** 11,263,
76.
TL V: TWA 50 ppm; STEL 150 ppm DTLVS* 4,406,
80.
Toxicology Review: JTEHD6 2(3),671,77; CLPTAT 8,
91,67; JOCMA7 16(3),194,74; JOCMA7 17(9),603,75;
FNSCA6 2,67,73; BNYMAM 54,413,78; 27ZTAP
3,146,69. OSHA Standard: Air: TWA 100 ppm; C1200;
Pk 300/5M/2H (SCP-J) FEREAC 39,23540,74. DOT:
ORM-A, Label: None FEREAC 41,57018,76. Occupa­
tional Exposure to Trichloroethylene recm std: Air:
TWA 100 ppm; CL 150 ppm/10M NTIS**. Occupa­
tional Exposure to Waste Anesthetic Gases and Vapors
recm std: Air: CL 2 ppm/1H NTIS••. NCI Carcino­
genesis Bioassay Completed; Results Positive: Mouse
(NCITR*NCI-CG-TR-2,76); Results Negative: Rat
(NCITR(NCI-CG-TR-2,76). Currently tested by NTP
for carcinogenesis by Standard Bioassay Protocol as
of April 1982. NTP Carcinogenesis Bioassay Com­
pleted as of April1982. "NIOSH Manual of Analytical
Methods" VOL 1 127, Vol 3, S336. NIOSH Current
Intelligence Bulletin 2, 1975. Reported in EPA TSCA
Inventory, 1980. EPA TSCA 8e NO: 05780146-
Followup sent as of April, 1979.
THR: A strong skn, eye irr. MUT data. An exper TER,
ETA, CA~C. HIGH ivn, scu; ihl; MOD ihl, orl, ipr;
LOW orl, 1hl. Inhal of high cone causes narcosis and
anesthesia. A form of addiction has been observed in
exposed workers. Prolonged inhal of mod cone causes
headache and drowsiness. Fatalities following severe,
acute exposure have been attributed to ventricular fi­
brillation resulting in cardiac failure. There is damage
to liver and other organs from chronic exposure. Cases
have been reported but are of questionable validity.
Determination of the metabolites trichloracetic acid
and trichloroethanol in urine reflects the absorption
of trichloroethylene. A food additive permitted in
food for human consumption. A common air contam­
inant.
Fire Hazard: Low, when exposed to heat or flame. High
cone of trichloroethylene vapor in high-temp air can
be made to burn mildly if plied with a strong flame.
Though such a condition is difficult to produce, flames
or arcs should not be used in closed equipment which
contains any solvent residue or vapor.
Spontaneous Heating: No.
Disaster Hazard: Dangerous. When heated to decomp
it emits tox fumes of ct-. See chlorides.
For further information see Vol. 1, No. 2 and Vol. 3,
No. 1 of DPIM Report.
Incomp: Can react violently with AI, Ba, N20 4, Li, Mg,
liquid 02, 0 3, KOH, KN03, Na, NaOH, Ti.
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
iiExAMETHYLENETEfRAMINE
CAS RN: 100970 NIQSH #: MN 4725000
mf: CsH12N•; mw: 140.22
· Odorless rhombic ccystals from alcohol. mp: 280° sub­
limes, flash p: 482°F, d: 1.33 @ -5°. V. sl sol in hot eth.
··sYNS:
AMMONIOFORMALDEHYDE
FORMAMINE
HEXAFORM.
HEXAMETHYLENAMn;E
HEXAMETHYI.EI'rrE11tiN
(GERMAN)
· TOXICITY DATA:
.fur-1:SC 6 mglwe1V16H
c:yt-hm.n:hJe 1 ~oVL
dlt-mus-ipr 2S gm/kg
dlt-mus-od 2S gm/kg
scu-rat 1DLo:140 gm/kg/
78W-I:ETA
HEXAMINE
HEXILMETHYLENAMINE
METHENAMINE
1,3,5,7-TETRAAZAADAMANTANE
UROTROPINE
3-2-1 CODEN:
CBINAS 15,219,76
HUMAA7 4;1 12,67
DMWOAX 92,2315,67
HUMAA7 4,112,67
FAONAU 50A,77,72
scu-rat LDLo:2QO mg!kg HBTXAC 1,84,56
ivn-rat LDS0:92QO mg!kg AEPPAE 221,166,S4
orl-mus..LDLo:st2 mg!kg NTIS•• AD-A066-307
ipr-mus LDLo:s12 mglkg CBccre 3,126,51
scu-mus LDLo:450 mg!kg HBTXAC 1,84,56
scu-cat LDLo:2oo mg!kg HBTXAC 1,84,56
scu-gpg·LDLo:Joo mg!kg HBTXA~ 1,84,56
Toxicology Review: CMTV AS 10(3),49,73; 27ZfAP
3,92,69. "NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods"
VOL 4 263•. Reported in EPA TSCA Inventory, 1980.
EPA TSCA 8(a) Preliminary Assessment Information
Proposed Rule FERREAC 45,13646,80.
THR: HIGH scu; LOW via ivn route. A MOD irr to
skn, eyes and mu mem. An exper NEO. Some persons
suffer a skn rash if they come in contact with this
material or the fumes evolved when it is heated. Pure
hexamethylenetetramine may be taken internally in
small amounts· and is used in medicine as a urinary
antiseptic. Its major industrial use is in the manufacture
of phenolic resins. It is combustible and can be readily
ignited when a flame is applied directly to.its surface.
It liberates formaldehyde on decamp.
Fire Hazard: Mod, when exposed to heat or flame; can
react with oxidizing materials. Reacts violently with
Na20z.
-22-
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX A
I MAPS AND PH.O'I'(X;RAPHS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DRA
F
T
35°37130''
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
82°001 18 MI.
Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Su rvey
Control by USGS and USC&GS
Topography by photogrammetnc mP.Ihods fro~ aerial photographs
taken 1960. Field checked 1962
Polyconic project1on. 1927 North Amencan datum
10,000-foot gr1d based on North Carolma coordinate system
1000-meler Uni\·ersal Trarlsverse Mercator gnd ticks,
,:one 17, shown 1n blue 1
Fme red dashed lines indicate selected fence and field lines where
generally visible on aer1al photographs, This Information IS unchecked
Red t1nt md1cates area m wh1ch only landmark bui ldmgs are shown
UTM GRID AND J%2 MAGNETIC NORTH
DECLINATI\JN ~T C(Nr(R Of $H[[T
"'"'
SCALE 1·24000
woo
CONTOUR INTERVAL 40 FEET
DOTIED LINES REPRESENT 20 FOOT CONTOURS
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
THIS MAP COMPLIES WITH NATI ONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS
700() FEET
FOR SALE BY U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, WASHINGTON, D. C. 20242
A FOLDER DESCRIBING TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS AND SYMBOLS IS AVAILABLE ON REQUEST
QUAOR~NGLE LOCATION
MARION EAST QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA
7.5 MINUTE (TOPOGRAPHIC)
81 os;'30"
RIVER
81 ~52130''
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Su rvey
:;ontrol b)· USGS and USC&GS
Heavy-duty __ L1ghl duty fopography by photogram rnetru:: methods from aerial photographs
Metllum-duty ____ -~~-Unimproved dirt ____ ..... ~ aken 1960. Field checked 1962
0 Interstate Route 0 ~olycomc projection. 1927 North American datum
U S Route Q SI<Jte Routel O,OOO-foot grid based on North Carolina coordinate system
LOCO-meter Un1~ersal Transverse Mercator grid t1cks, ,
:one 17, shown in blu~
=ine red dashed lmes i nd1ca l~> selected If' nee and field lines where
MARION EAST, N. C 3enerally viSible on aerial photograpns. Th1s 1nformation is unchecked
N3537.5-W8152.5/7 .5
1962
AMS 4655 IH NW-SERIES VB42
UTM GRID AND 1962 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION ~T CENTE!l OF SHEET
c
--:oN7ou R'"7NTERVAL 10 FEET
DOTTED LINES REPRESENT 20-FOOT CONTOURS I DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
THIS MAP COMPLIES WITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS
1 K LOMETER
FOR SALE BY U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVE , WASHINGTON 25, D. C.
A FOLDER DESCRIBING TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS AND SY BOLS IS AVAILABLE ON REQUEST
QUADRANGI E LOC.UION
GLEN ALPINE QUADRANGLE
Heavy-duty
Med1um-duty
NORTH CAROLINA
(TOPOGRAPHIC)
ROAD CLASSif1CATION
Light duty
N.~/81 8J045'
35°451
"51
!12'30''
40'
J947
Un1mproved dnt ---------
Q Interstate Route Q U S Route Q State Route
GLEN AlJPINE, N.C.
N3537.5-W8145/7 5
1962
AMS 4655 Ill NE-SERIES V842
DRA
F
T
N
-
0
US 70 DRUM DUMP
NC D981472624
·­' - -
0
- -----
COUNfY
BURKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROliNA ---- ---- -
DRA
F
T
- - -
US 70 Drum Dump
NC D981472624
-
7-8-86
East side of waste pile.
us 7 0 Drwu Dump
NC D981472624 7-8-86
Recovering waste pile after
sampl ing.
---- -
East side of waste pile.
US 70 Drum Dump
NC D981472624
7-8 -86
Waste pile from eastern
embankment.
--
l
---
West s i de of waste pile.
US 70 Drum Dump
NC D981472624
-
7-8-86
7-8-86
Sample #3-Surface ~ soil 5 ft.
-
south of waste pile .
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX B
I I.ABCRAT<RYDATA
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DRA
F
T
Cc~/\/ .
SAMPLE ANALYSES REQUES N. C. Department of Human Resources I Division of Health Services .
Laboratory of Public Health
P. 0. Box 28047
306 N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, 27611
I Site Number /d /J 9 cf/ l/ ?:;:) (; fl Y
Name of Site {./. L 70 I:J.o un j)UI'h Q
I Collected By ,f?r i: /±e /Loj If ID# ';3 tf'
Field Sample Number --=3:..-.:3=-..::(o=· _3=-=----------­
Site Loca,tion ~ fnoqoA.IDI1:J Ne .
Date Collected • -:(fL(!J ~ / 9fJ{. Time 0 9SO
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Type of Sample:
Environmental Concentrate
Groundwater ( 1) ./ Solid (5)
Comments #t ,&-11,~ ce.-r.,·.q ,Okz-ka c), (2
Surface Water (2) Liquid (6)
Soil (3) Sludge {7)
' : Other (4) Other {8)
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
E:xtractables Total
Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1
__ Arsenic __ Arsenic __ Silver
__ Barium __ Barium __ Sulfates
__ Cadmium __ Cadmium __ Zinc
__ Chromium __ Chloride _Ph
__ Lead __ Chromium __ Conductivity
__ Mercury __ .Copper _ms
__ Selenium __ Fluoride _Toe
__ Silver --Iron --
--__ Lead --
--__ Manganese --
--__ Mercury ----__ Nitrate --
--__ Selenium --
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1
_9.~T:GC/MS _EDB __ ·Methoxychlor
__ Actd:B/N Ext. LPCB's <o1l PP"'--_Toxaphene
_TOX __ Petroleum _2,4-D * --__ l.!ndrin -·-2,4,5-TP (silvex) ~~
--__ Lindane --
MICROBIOLOGY RADIOCHEMISTRY
Parameter Parameter Results PCi/1
__ (MF) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis __ Gross Alpha
__ (MPN) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis __ Gross Beta
----
----
Date Received ~..-~-.lL....::::......L.:~.!...---'-=,----=------1 Date Extracted ~~~~+"~~~'..L..:.":-f~PUJ.:¥U:o!:;~L--
/tJ-!5--~
I
Reported By Lab Number _ __.,!f,_...,.;..:.~_-·....;1.._. 0
::-cr .. :.;_,D.::.;_;;::,...r:.;_.) __________ --f
DHS 3191 (Revised 7/85)
SoliJ and Hazardous Waste (Review 7 /87) 1 /=f6o;t?"~,6-(;a; ?53-I
.
DRA
F
T
I 3
~. C. Department of Human Resources .
lfi\·ision of Health Services . . SAMPLE ANALYSES REQUEST State Laboratory of Public Health
P. 0. Box 28047
306 N. Wilmington Street I lo' b 9 ~ l rr 7-"1-b 2.. V Raleigh; 27611 :::;;:::;a . .::? :,) l /
Sire Number ,Afa:-A Zt:n4 Field ·sample Number ---.....!:::~:....>..:" -:.;..'....:.&=---~.L:-_-'--'---_..:.._---
.ame of Site !fo<f 7? fJ,,, ~~~ DuCrtjJ Site Loca;ion·.,.._ 41 ..... 1.....:.1_,o ..... ,,.-.,-"1~ri<:.LA_,..=/v~.n..,_~,_. -LN-...!.,_~(1 _____ _
Collected By .l/:t i-A-< /Lo.,rlf ID# . ;3_5' Date Collected ·!i-L(!J R · !9fJ-{. ·Time /12 00
type of Sample:
Environmental
I Groundwater ( 1)
Surface Water (2)
I Soil (3)
Other (4)
Concentrate
----'· Solid (5)
__ :__Liquid (6)
../ siudge (7)
__ Other (8)
Comments
#c>L. V1J c<rr,ts . !P !I e-df! aJ(? i" a 'd./
I INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
I
I
I
I
Extractables
Parameter Results mg/1
__ Arsenic
__ Barium
__ Cadmium
__ Chromium
__ Lead
__ · Mercury
_._Selenium
_. _Silver
----
--,1= I
I
I
Parameter
-~~T:GC/MS __ Ac1d:BIN Ext.
_TOX
----
Results mg/1
Total
Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1
__ Arsenic __ Silver
__ Barium __ Sulfates
__ Cadmium __ Zinc
__ Chloride· _Ph
__ Chromium __ ~onductivity
__ Copper _TDS
__ Fluoride _Toe
__ Iron --__ Lead --__ Manganese --
--Mercury --__ Nitrate --__ Selenium --
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1
_·EDB ->L'Methoxychlor < 0 I l ]'f""'-~PCB's <O, l·pprn· ' ....-L... Toxaphene -s:;_o, &:2-Pf!t:ll.
__ Petroleum vz.4,D · <a ·l L1:t:'n1
~Endrin <: 0 l 0 ( 1'P""= JL 2,4,5,TP (silvex) r• <" 0 •l.tflJY1
__ Lindane < (') t Ql.J.. pp.bj --
1.-------------M __ IC_R_O __ B_IO_L_O __ G_Y __ ~---------,.-----~-----RA __ D __ IO_C_H __ E~_I_IS_TR __ Y~. ----------~
Parameter
1--(MF) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis I= (MPN) Coliform Colonies~lOOmls
~-
Date Recdved 1./if · {4(2 t/.. ~ . ·
Parameter Results PCi/1
__ Gross Alpha
__ Gross Beta
Date Reported ::::=-:--::n:;;x;~----:r:-r---------ikJ.l ... 0 rt=:sr.~PC.B} jkJ)
t1 "'f-·'f~ ~Date Analyzed ..... $'--"""..2...;::h~~==-=~o...JUIU.L.l.l? __ J..q_-).~-~~t,:.....~B!.L&~:::::..... __ _ I Do« Ext<Oct<d },Fft~'Y. f; -Jk~&&p
Rc:ported By ------------------Lab Number ----"~-'-"'-'-''--"--"-------------1 DHS 3191 (Revised i/85)
So!iJ and Ha:~rdous Waste (Review 7 /87)
DRA
F
T
I ~-C. Department of Human Resources
Di~o·ision of Health Services SAMPLE ANALYSES REQUEST
3
State Laboratory of Public Health
P. 0. Box 28047
306 N. Wilmington Street /d D Cj J' I </"1'-(pLy
Site Number _,fh&4:l@A3~~-=~--~fi~~-~:1.~f}-':t_ _ __:_· ------Field Sample Number _ ___,3=· ;._,::;3~e'-·, _.\_--__________ _ .arne of Site '/J..) 70 '/j;, I m /\ Uh Q Site Loca~ion· .. mot?jri/LID11;}
I Raleigh, 27611
0 ....J--~ -/1 r.~ ? . -r: /1 0 Q .t:'J I. Collected By l£! -L ,/dr( LWj;p ID# ,"") ~ Date Collected · J!-l._tc;;.J ·tj I Ur>
type of Sample:
/0 30 Time ...... _.........,=-----
Environmental Concentrate Comments
I Groundwater ( 1) Solid (5) ·1!3 . -, ILl ~"-' s k s-. · ,, 1-d ;ru m_s·
Surface Water (2)
/
I -:,L Soil (3)
Other (4)
I Extractables
I Parameter
__ Arsenic
__ Barium
~~--Cadmium __ Chromium
__ Lead
__ Mercury
I ·--Selenium
__ Silver
I
I
I
I
----
----
!?arameter 9.&: T:GC/MS
_. _ Actd:BIN Ext.
_TOX .
I J--
' •--i
Results mg/1
Results mg/1
Liquid (6)
Sludge (7)
Other (8)
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Total
Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1
--Arsenic __ Silver
__ Barium __ Sulfates
__ Cadmium __ Zinc
__ Chloride _Ph
__ Chromium --Conductivity
--Copper _TDS
__ Fluoride _TOC
--Iron --__ Lead --__ Manganese --__ Mercury --__ Nitrate --__ Selenium --
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1
_EDB -l.LMethoxychlor <nl lppm.
LPCB's <. ot ll'fb!l ___L_ Toxaphene <O·Zpnm
__ Petroleum v/2,4-0 -:'Jf=. r
~Endrin < 0~ . _L_ 2,4,5-TP (silvex) .:.f-<~~-=~ __ Lindane --
I MICROBIOLOGY RADIOCHEMISTRY ~------P-a-ra_m_e-te-r~~~~~~----~------.--P-a-ra~m--e-te_r __________ R_e_s_u_lt~s-P_C_i_/_1 ______ ~
1!--(MF) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis ! __ (MPN) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis I . .
II=
DateRecdved 7-/0-~~~ .
IDO<e Emacted~Q~;;~~
Repo:-ted By · I !:>i-15 3191 IRo:vi<,c.-d 7/85)
S,·.l;J anJ H;~:ardous Wa~te (Review 7/87) 3
__ Gross Alpha
__ Gross Beta
Date Reported ~p.~~~s~r.~~~p,r.~~B~s~---------------------
Date Analyzed <g-.;:;..6-3'6JI;g
,.,. -~-~A.'' C• Lab Number ~=!· : U:... .. .;-.;<.'-->
DRA
F
T
I ·. .
~-C. Department of Human Resources State Laboratory of Public Health
3
Dh·ision ofHea!thServices SAMPLE ANALYSES REQUEST P.o. Box28047
I /2--A q _? j t/1-2..(;, 7,.'-f-306N. Wilmington Street ~ 0 r 0 7 Raleigh, 27611
Site Number _;Cf~~'~@§¥~f!":E~;z5§lLZ:~J~f/}9__~__:_---___:_ FieHSample Number --'·3~~-=~--==(~.:..j .....:;~ __ _,___ __ ____; __ _ I Name of Site /J. s= '70 [J,;, I;, [)( l(h£1 Site Location mo,rc;zat1..k.I1J
Collected By & :1: t"+f /Loj/f ID# . ~:3. ?f Date Collected · -:{it.ey ·~ · t9flC
NC!
.. :nme 7[ [) VO I Type of Sample:
Environmental Concentrate
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
___ Groundwater ( 1)
---Surface Water (2)
,/ Soil (3)
__ Other (4)
Extractables
-....--:· Solid (5)
__ Liquip (6)
__ Sludge (7)
__ Other (8)
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
..
Parameter Resulumg/1 Parameter Results mg/1
__ Arsenic __ Arsenic
__ Barium -·-Barium
__ Cadmium __ Cadmium
__ Chromium --Chloride·
__ Lead __ Chromium
__ Mc:rcury __ Copper
_Selenium __ Fluoride I · . Silver __ Iron
__ Lead
1-__ Manganese
--~ercury ,-__ Nitrate. i= __ Selenium.
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Parameter Results mg/1 Parame~er Results mg/1
.9-~T:GC/MS _·EDB
~PCB's < o, I Pf'1"" __ Ac1d:B/N Ext.
_TOX __ Petroleum I .
Comments
.£'1!2(
Total
Parameter
__ Silver
--Sulfates
--Zinc
-Ph
--~onductivity
_TDS
_toe
------------
..
Parameter
~Methoxychlor
' _L_ Toxaphene
vz,4,D I --.~Endrin ~~~ ~ 2,4,5,TP (silvex)
--__ Lindane --I. MICROBIOLOGY RADIOCHEMISTRY
Results mg/1
·•
Results mg/1
~:~ <~·l .
<o ·l
I Paramete< Parameter Results PCi/1
__ Gross Alpha
__ Gross Beta
1~----___,----~~------~~
Dnc Iteceived/$. 0 ·~0~· 'lJ. . . · Date Reported ;:;::-;:::;:::;r""::::i~~c----:-;-.,-------1 'I ~&4. /. ~~~ W ]>~J'T. 4-PdJ:S dLA../1) ./_
D:!:e Extracted ~?t5~ ~-~/~ .Cf":f()Q Date Analyzed g-,:z.6 -8'61{11 ' 1-$'"' ..... }6'.0
Ro:.-ported By ------------------Lab Number 6·'\1919 I DHS 3191 (~c.-~·ised 7185)
Soi!J and Ha:ardous \Vaste (Review 7 /87)
DRA
F
T
N. C. Department of Human Resources State Laboratory of Public Health
I Division of Health Se/rvi·~ fj" Cj
0
_
1
,, t ~ ~A~'/PLE ANALYSES REQUEST P.o. Box 28047 ~ I' -r I £.-(s ~ 306 N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, 27611
I Site Number ~ Field Sample Number ___ 3_?_ .. _~_.;..7 __________ _
NameofSite ~ ~ /)urn.c:J SiteLoca;ion~,/2?o,""j;r-;,a./nl);).l1/(_
Collecrod By L-JU-k ;;;;; ID# ,{? .f Daro Collectod J ~· <4 I? .f1, Time I Type of Sample:
Environmental Concentrate
I ~Groundwater ( 1) __ Solid (5)
Comments
7/-.s:-. /f/1, :nn4 .l'f<> . r n'f'L{ ·
Surface Water (2) Liquid (6)
I Soil (3) Sludge (7)
Other (4) Other (8)
I INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Extractables Total
Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/ 1 Parameter Results mg/1
__ Arsenic __ Arsenic __ silver I
__ Barium __ Barium __ Sulfates
__ Cadmium __ Cadmium __ Zinc
__ Chromium __ Chloride _Ph I __ Lead __ Chromium --Conductivity
__ Mercury __ Copper _TDS
__ Selenium __ Fluoride _TOC
__ Silver __ Iron ----__ Lead ----__ Manganese ----__ Mercury --
--__ Nitrate --
--__ Selenium --
I
I
I ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
I Parameter
_P&T:GC/MS
Results mg/1
~Acid: BIN Ext. I __ T_o_x ____________ _
I MICROBIOLOGY
Parameter
__ (MF) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis
__ (MPN) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis I
--
I --
Parameter
_EDB
.....\L.PCB's
__ Petroleum
./.Endrin
_v'"_, Lindane
Date Received ?--/0-70 {?. ·
I ?E...sr; L. , vA K>.t ,.-p_
Date Extracted z:-3-361/!l? } dj~'$k..7f2
Results mg/1 Parameter
v Methoxychlor ~....LL...L!~~.I...Jj:.,.,U.r't-.._../ Toxaphene
../ 2,4~D
-"'-u:-<~l>O<..Io"7fc-fq-<L.!."t ..,/ 2,4,5~TP (silvex)
RADIOCHEMISTRY
Results mg/1
Parameter Results PCi/1
__ Gross Alpha
__ Gross Beta
--
--
Date Reported=~-----------------p6S7:
Date Analyzed lf-J?-2'6 1& 7?
Reported By ~ ~~1 neon,
----------------------~bNumber --~t~)-=-~·~¥·~~~-·~j~L)~~~.l ___________ _ I DHS 3191 (Revised 7/85)
Solid and Hazardous \Vaste (Review 7/87)
DRA
F
T
N.C. Department of Human Resources
I Division of Health Services SAMPLE ANALYSES REQUEST
I 2-h '-/ d I Lj ·.7 2 ~ ").. v·
State Laboratory of Public Health
P. 0. Box 28047
306 N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, 27611
Site Number ~/'! j-t'f;9 IN orne of Site &L ( 7tJ /)r-u <"/ /) o~
Collected By J'?ar />e ;?tr2fA ID# 1?
IT ype of Sample:
Environmental I _L_ Groundwater ( 1 ).
---Surface Water (2)
__ Soil (3)
__ Other (4)
Concentrate
__ Solid (5)
__ Liquid (6)
__ Sludge (7)
__ Other (8)
_ ......
·3-:j/? Field Sample Number ---'-;___··_-'_<o.:;._ __________ _
Site Locasion .-~112acaa/L./o 11 ;J
---;;T d C!' P. Date Collected ' (u!s..-]'. cY I 7:1 b
~--A1J,Jon
Comments
ce. .s I Yf'. If
/}/('
Time // 2-. .r-1
I
I INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Extractables Total
Parameter Results mg/ 1 Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/ 1
__ Arsenic __ Arsenic __ Silver .. __ Barium __ Barium __ Sulfates .
__ Cadmium __ Cadmium __ Zinc
__ Chromium __ Chloride _Ph
__ Lead __ Chromium --Conductivity
__ Mercury __ Copper _ms
__ Selenium __ Fluoride _Toe
__ Silver __ Iron ----__ Lead ----__ Manganese ----__ Mercury ----__ Nitrate ----__ Selenium --
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1
~P&T:GC/MS _EDB __ Methoxychlor
--Acid: BIN Ext. __ PCB's .. .. --Toxaphene
_TOX __ Petroleum -2,4~D
--__ Endrin --2,4,5~TP (silvex)
---·-Lindane --
MICROBIOLOGY RADIOCHEMISTRY
Parameter Parameter Results PCi/ 1
__ (MF) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis __ Gross Alpha
__ (MPN) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis __ Gross Beta
--------
Date Received .....L-7----<-~....:.f::?_-~tfZ-=&:.;;..?-1(/~·~P.-·_·_...:._ ______ Date Reported-----------------I Date Extracted------------------Date Analyzed 8'-.::lO-g~ 7JLL'I­
--------------------LabNumber ---~-~-'-:j_··-~--·-~-~----------------Reported By
1 DHS 3191 (Revised 7/85)
Solid :md Hazardous Waste (Review 7 /87)
DRA
F
T
N.C. Department of Human Resources
rivision of Health Services SAMPLE ANALYSES REQUEST State Laboratory of Public Health
P. 0. Box 28047
306 N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, 27611 /2-. ~ite Number ~ /) q f / 'f 7CJ b d 'f Field Sample Number _ _...?...e.)__.:3......_0L'''-f1--------
1Namc of Site (/, C 7tJ lJr, l rY1 bu ~ Site Location _-.020 o/!d-Wn; ,A/<1
Collected By ReI :tL /}] a...c....Jec s: ID# _ _.{)~{!.__ Date Collected . 7-J -tft7 Time ~ype ofSampl: _
fJJ /70(]
I
I
Environmental
---Groundwater ( 1)
---Surface Water (2)
./ Soil (3)
__ Other (4)
Concentrate
__ Solid (5)
__ Liquid (6)
__ Sludge (7)
__ Other (8)
Comments
A/co Jt' ,j.._ -Itt; f ~ tl •
I
I
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Extractables
Parameter Results mg/1
__ Arsenic
__ Barium
__ Cadmium
__ Chromium
__ Lead
__ Mercury
__ Selenium
--Silver
--
------
--
Parameter Results mg/1
[~P&T:GC/MS ~Acid: BIN Ext.
_TOX
----
MICROBIOLOGY
Parameter
__ (MF) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis
__ (MPN) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis
--
--
Date Receive~ j(J-Yb t/.1: I Date Extracted ~~d:Pj
Reported By I DHS319l(Revised7185)
SoliJ and Hazardous Waste (Review 7 /87)
Total
Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1
__ Arsenic __ Silver
__ Barium __ Sulfates
__ Cadmium __ Zinc
__ Chloride _Ph
__ Chromium __ Conductivity
__ Copper _ms
__ fluoride _TOC
__ Iron --__ Lead --__ Manganese --__ Mercury --__ Nitrate --__ Selenium --
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Parameter
_EDB
__ PCB's
__ Petroleum
__ Endrin
__ Lindane
7
Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1
__ Methoxychlor
__ Toxaphene
_2,4~0
--2,4,5~TP (silvex)
--
RADIOCHEMISTRY
Parameter Results PCi/1
__ Gross Alpha
__ Gross Beta
----
Date Reported------------------­
Date Analyzed -------------------
Lab Number __ h_.-=-:· '-=-·' .1;..:..9...;.__5.....;3,;_ _______ _
DRA
F
T
I
N. C. Department of Human Resources
rh:ision of Health Services SAMPLE ANALYSES REQUEST State Laboratory of Public Health
P. 0. Box 28047
306 N. Wilmington Street
12_ _,_ 0. . J 3 ~~ J.Q lfite Number /-1-CC /) 7 £'/ ·y '7 ? 6 :1 ~ Field ·Sample Number _--~o_:::__...:.l ____ ..:.__ ______ _
Raleigh·, 27611
IIName of Site (./,[ 7 a be: L t'q b •1;--nr/? Site Location mil) r4ti ;b . ..--~. ;1/{'
Collected By 16-t /1__ tJb,. tft.--;:,· ID# _._C"-41/c---Date Collected 7-,,;;{ -.?(: · Time I 7 tfi Ct lr ype of Sampl;: . .
Environmental Concentrate Comments
I
I
I
---Groundwater ( 1) ----'· Solid (5) #7·-~., t', ,?, ... ~ ..;;? :.<.r? fro,77
I
I
I
I
---Surface Water (2)
__ Soil (3)
__ Other (4)
Extractable&
-~ Liquid (6)
. ~ siudge (7)
__ Other (8)
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1
__ Arsenic __ Arsenic
__ Barium __ Barium
__ Cadmium __ Cadmium
__ Chromium __ Chloride·
__ Lead __ Chromium
__ M~rcury __ Copper
-·-Selenium __ Fluoride
_._Silver __ Iron
--__ Lead
--__ Manganese
--M;ercury
__ Nitrate. != 11-I __ Selenium
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
I Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1
~P~T:GCIMS _·EDB
* __ PCB's . __._..__ Actd:B/N Ext.
_TOX __ Petroleum
--. __ Endrin I
--__ Lindane
Total
Parameter Results mg/1
__ Silver
__ Sulfates
__ Zinc
_Ph
__ Conductivity
_ros _toe
--
----------
Parameter Results mg/1
__ Methoxychlor . __ To~aphene
_2,4~D
--2,4,5~TP (silvex)
--lr-_______ M_I_C_R_O_B_I_O_L_O_G_Y _______ .-___ ~---RA_D_I_O_C_H_E_M_I_STR_Y~·-------~
Parameter II--(MF) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis
__ (MPN) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis
Parameter
__ Gross Alpha
__ Gross Beta
Results PCi/1
I Date Received 1-·/o-?z£; 1/, J? Date Reported
Date Extracted ----------------'-----Date Analyzed -------------------
. ~ '"·1 Ot':"~ -------------------LabNumber n .-.•• }..y I Reported By
DHS 3191 (Revised 7185)
<:"li,J and H~:ardou~ \Vaste (Review 7 /87)
DRA
F
T
. . I .
~-C. Department of Human Resources
• ivision of Health Services SAMPLE ANALYSES REQUEST State Laboratory of Public Health
P. 0. Box 28047
306 N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, 27611 j'J-
I Site Number 7~ {) 9e; Y7 '-h 1 V
NameofSite U<..f. 70 lJ.aun /)urnLl
I Collected By Jrei& /22tzJif'cs ID# 0~
Type of Sample:
Environmental I Groundwater {1)
---Surface Water (2) I Soil (3)
__ Other (4)
Concentrate
/ Solid (5)
__ Liquid ( 6)
__ Sludge (7)
--Other (8)
Field Sample Number -:.-~30::!. :;_.::3;__l-'-..,_/_· --------­
Site Loc~ion ·,/22 o.c:;a4 Pa J
Date Collected 2-Z·-cYG
ZJ ' :
!f/(;l
Time / "7 /OJ
I INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Extractables
Parameter Results mg/1
__ Arsenic
__ Barium
__ Cadmium
__ Chromium
__ Lead
__ Mercury
__ Selenium
__ Silver
----
------
Parameter Results mg/1
~ P&T:GC/MS 2 Acid:B/N Ext.
_TOX
----
MICROBIOLOGY
Parameter
__ (MF) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis
__ (MPN) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis
----
Total
Parameter Results mg/ 1 Parameter Results mg/1
__ Arsenic __ Silver
__ Barium __ Sulfates
__ Cadmium __ Zinc
__ Chloride _Ph
__ Chromium __ Conductivity
__ Copper _TDS
__ Fluoride _Toe
__ Iron --__ Lead --__ Manganese --__ Mercury --__ Nitrate. --__ Selenium --
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Parameter
_EDB
__ PCB's
__ Petroleum
~Endrin
~Lindane
Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1
--i...<:"Methoxychlor :~~ ~Toxaphene
~2,4,D ¥-
<otOl~ / 2,4,5, TP (silvex) ·JC-
<atn ~:71'\.. --
RADIOCHEMISTRY
Parameter Results PCi/ 1
__ Gross Alpha
__ Gross Beta
--
--
Date Reported=-",.--~.,_..,..-._------------1¥ST.:-. -
Date Analyzed Y.../lk=Y{:,7/,J?
DRA
F
T
I
N. C. Department of Human Resources
I Dh:ision of Health Services SAMPLE ANALYSES REQUEST State Laboratory of Public Health
P. 0. Box 28047
306 N. Wilmington Street ,·z_
Site Number Afll, /) 9 // ,y· 7 2-(e ~ l£ I Name of Site, .0/·L_ Zc.'l .D~'l~crJ J),J/np
Collected By c..-/J7..J. /3L 1rke (11 4ID# . --1 Type of Sample: .
I
Environmental Concentrate
___ Groundwater ( 1)
---Surface Water (2)
__ Soil (3)
__ Other (4)
-~·_... Solid (5)
V/ Liqu~d .(6)
__ Sludge (7)
__ Other (8)
Raleigh, 27611
Field Sample Number __ -=o::S:........:2):::;..__.'"f.L.. _..;·"2--=-___;_·_· ____ ..._ __
Site Location [1-1 D .-""'? ,'-! /] Co 0
Date Collected , ;7-;-J-,f/: .
1
? • ·Time __ ··::-::::-_-_. __
Comments
~·c?d.u-d h~n·
I
I INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ExtractabJes
Parameter Results mg/i
, __ Arsenic
__ Barium
j __ Cadmium
j __ Chromium
__ Lead
__ Mercury
__ Seienium
·-·-Silver
----
I ·--I ,--i
Parameter Results mg/1
I...:..L P& T:GC/MS
--Acid: BIN Ext.
_TOX
--
--
MICROBIOLOGY
I Parameter
__ (MF) Coiiform Colonies/lOOmis
__ (MPN) Colifor:n Colonies/lOOmis
--
--
Total
Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1
__ Arsenic -~Silver
-·-Barium __ Sulfates
__ Cadmium __ Zinc
__ Chloride _Ph
__ Chromium --Gonductivity
__ Copper _TDS
__ fluoride _TOC
__ Iron --__ Lead --
__ Manganese --
--11ercury --__ Nitrate. --__ Selenium --
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1
_·EDB __ Methoxychlor . ' __ PCB's __ Toxaphene
__ Petroleum _z,4,D
__ Endrin --2,4,5,TP (silvex)
__ Lindane --
RADIOCHEMISTRY
Parameter Resuits PCi/1
__ Gross Alpha
· __ Gross Beta
--
---
Dztc Received 7:... /0-fie 1/.l Date Reported ------------------1 Date: Extracted ________ __:.. ______ ......:... ___ Date Analyzed __..S';L-.!'!;x:>,._,-"-#.L~ubil-r -J7')'-f-l.'tls.:.l-___________ _
6 ·~-1 oe,t
Rt·porred By -------------------Lab Number ____ ;:.:;__:..::-·:::.·.;....:'·:....~ "'-..;..S_·:....··-----------
InHS 3:91 (Rc:viseJ 7/85) /D
Su!.J ~nd Ha:~rdous \Vaste (Re,·iew 7/87)
DRA
F
T
I···
I
SOLID AND F~ARDOUS WASTE YJl~AG~NT BRANCH
·chain of Custody Record
R'azardous Waste ~..aterials
1 Location of Sampling: Generator -_Transporter
· ____ Storage Facility ____ Disposal Facility
_L_other: · ·j),rU ,. . .,._ IJU_,r-:p ·
____ Treatment ?~~il
__ . ~~ndfiH.
I c 1 N -,., ... r .· 7. 1J T , • ( ) crr.puny s ·arne J e_epnone ~~~~--~~----------------------~--~~---------------
I
I
D t C' 1 d 7J ~ /? 0 .. 1 4 ~ / ·
Teleyhone( 917 ) 733-2.tf 0 I
Time Sampled t2 fJ?J -// ·& ~-_a e ..... :np e /1/~7 . -:r;; _ LO-~
I Type of Process Generating Waste_~--~c~/~IJ~~~~-~~~~~~'11-·~----------------~----------­,.. ..
lc< · fP · . na::Ln L• ossess~on:
-.J.b}_:-.·~· :r::1..; . .:T::!...--""-.~-iJe:....:· :::.1..·~·· ~d1~w~v.L../.t1----~ ti/r,_A !/-/?lr:_ k .. y
• signature tit:l~
I --4/· " . ) --7). -~ .J_.
2 o 14/'--P-<--' 0. r/ZV!tZl/? I
1-/(J-fh·. :
I signature inclusive dates
3.
I signature · title inclusive de. tes
Result~ reported
I signature title date
I Inst::-·,!l.:tions:
I
Complete all applicable information including signatures, and
submit witb'3nalysis request_ fo~s.
I If
.·
DRA
F
T
I
I
SOLID. Al\TD HAZARDOUS WASTE YA~AGEMENT :SRANCH
Chain of Custody Record
Hazardous Waste ¥~terials
~-
I !..oca t ion of Sampling: Generator
Storage Facility
\/Other:· l~tri/Cn
~Treatment ~~ci~
'
Addr-=~:r-. /lJo,~a.4 A,_n,· /Vt. · ·. , . I .. .J , ..
I Colle.::t:~r 1 s Hame ,#_.~iL .. :tY) a"..rkr s
signature
Date ~~.:.~1pled ·. 7~·-z, -:.J7"(, · Time Sampled j 7 .0:0 ·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--~.~~~~--------
Type oi.Process Generating Waste ____ . ~L!~12~tt=-~~~<U~~~{~l~i~'1·r·----------------~-------------
. . y
Chain t:•f Possession:
2. ~·.).~~
.sl.gnature
... .:>.
ResuJts reported
signature
signature
-.. :-· ~ •• ..o!:,i.-
?1/a~i:l /1La"i -!ju--t-#
. title
7·/o-a, .. · ·.
inclusive dates
title inclusive dates
title date
!ns t ~<lt: tions: Complete all applicable information including signatures) and
submit.with·~nalysis request. forms.
It-
DRA
F
T
I
I
•• -• -----• ._._ ---~~-~ -!-.:.\.V .!.\....!.:...-
Chain of Custody Reco~d
Hazardous Waste Y~terials
1 ~ocation Generator
____ Storage Facility
of Sa~pling: Transporter
___ Disposal Facili~y
;/) rJ(!l.-0 .
·Land-F.;--;-; ----·.··.----
I Lother:· ,Vrucn
Cc::.p<:1~y' s Name -U ~-· . q ·0 . Telepbor.e( )
0
--~~~~----L-~~-------------------------·----------------
1 .!.cdrt=!:"!:. · /tLp.,~~.?A ... A:v:,.· JV[E ·
} / '-T"J . • , E/J1-e7~c..i /'/f..e_.~7 c ~v-i' c;kr .. -rt~
I Colle.:tor s_Name £1,1 , tu/t;a(v Teleyho::1e(
.. ~?tllJ:e .
I
Date ;.~:.1pled~7-r----~d::::: __ ·--~£~C.c::~-----------T_ime S~pled _________ _
I
Type o£ Process Generating "Waste Ut1 k. iyt.-J )'') --~~.~~~~-~~~--------------------------------
:2--z-·-cl { . Jh /lJ·./;/-~-e{ h &~ 'JL(JLcy.,fi'r;.
dl~ ;-e..., ~/{l-{!.;-:t1 &"' .&:r-.t.J.e -tt.o.p+ z-ff.,..cf', _
I
'Fl;eld_· £~mp~.e No!' 33 ;z-z--_. __ _
Chair. vf Possession:
I 1.
I 2.
7-$'-,16 -Z-Iu-J't,
iilClusive dates -, ) . Sl.gnature
t-4--t~~-<:;..,c:.h::S...:::;~.4f.-;..... ~13~·~~~~-;;;;_..._..---:---· t!/~--t'~~ 7-/c--J%·
I
I
I
· · signature title ~ inclusive dates
? ..J•
Resu~L~ reported
signature
signatu~e
title inclusive cia tes
ti-:le date
I !nst:::->!Ctions: Co~Plete all applicable information includ~ng signatures, and
submit with·2nalysis request_ fo~s.
I
I
DRA
F
T
I
STATE LABORATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH
I DIVISION OF HEAlTH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUHAN RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 28047-306 N. WitHINGTON, ST., RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
-ORGANiC CHEHICAL ANALYSIS
~E/NEUTRAl AND ACID lAB NO ~0/Y-1£&:. h t11~¥-7 C.o!Yt/ Y t/?CJ/91?9
EXTRACT ABlES FIELD I 3_36J :1' ;Jt. 2-_ 3.JC. . .) . 3_-5t,C
OOHPOOND TYPE (.5) (7) ( .?) ( :3)
UNITS lJQ/1 {pq/kQ. lJQ/1 ~/kq) lJg/1 t'll9tlcru lJQ/1 ~/leg)
litrosodimethylamine /o/130 0 tA 1/1~ ~~
;(2-chloroethyl)ether -I
~-chlorophenol
~· ichlorobenzene
4-dichlorobenzene
1(-dlchlon>benzene
;(2-chlorot .. ""'"""ul)ether
~achloroethane
f-ni troso-di -n-Propyl amine
~nzene horone
~-nltrophenol
-dimethylphenol •
;(2-chloroethoxy)methane
_ ~ichlorophenol
11!.4-trlchlorobenzene
hthalene
achlorobutadiene
H:h 1 oro-m-creso 1
achlorocvclopentadiene
,,6-trichlorophenol
?-chloronaphthalene
rnaphthylene lnethyl phthalate
~initrotoluene /
•ceOAA_hthene '\
~initrophenol fo//6vo
initrotoluene /DJ'3:J7J
l-ni trophenol ,5()}/~t!b
~rene ;o/33D
1 lorophenylphenylether If_
1ethvl phthalate ~
~~ nl tn>-<>-cresol §Dj/fioo
nvlamine /o//3.3o
nzene I (;t;//r,o"
t-branophenyl phenvl ether /d/3.30
achlorobenzene I :n3u
tachlorophenol li2 1/JtCrJ
>henanthrene l!r /.33D ' l ,I/
~hracene ' utyl phthalate 37iJK 39£?K..
uoranthene \ \ !L ~i/ l-1 4
I Estimated value. !pl.: Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
I Haterial was analyzed for but not detected. The nutber is the Hininun Detection limit. -Not analyzed.
-Tentative identification. ·
~-On NRDC list of Priority Pollutants.
~. V.i.v-U.i.on o6 H~ selt.~.i.c.u ~ 3068-0 (4/86 Labo4atonyl
~ cr/f?So ~ 0/9-.r-/
?:Jb / "3./C:,If'
( _{_) _c_ I >
tWit lJlJQ/kg (lJg/1 \Jqlkq -," ~Iff
I
\I/ \I/
DRA
F
T
I
STATE LABORATORY Or PUBLIC HEALTH
I DIVISION OF HEALTII SERVICES, N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES P.O. BOX 28047-306 N; WILMINGTON, ST., RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
BASE/NEUTRAL AND ACID
EXTRACT ABLES
COMPOUND
ovrene
benzidine -
butyl benzyl phthalate
benz Cal anthracene
chrvsene
3 3-dichlorobenzidine
bis(2-ethvlhexvl)ohthalate
di-n-octvl ohthalate
benzo(blfluoranthene
benzo(k)fluoranthene
benzo(a)ovrene
i ndeno (1 2 3-cd) ovrene
dibenzo(a h)anthracene
benzo(q,h iloervlene
anillne
benzoic acid
benzvl alcohol
4-chloroanillne
dibenzofuran
2-methvlnaohthalene
2-methvlohenol
4-methvlohenol
2-nitroani Hne
3-n i troan ili ne
4-nitroanillne
2,4,5-trichloroohenol .
r'Ylt'_<flu,;1o '"'n <l'~
LAB NO
FIELD #
TYPE
UNITS
IIIJ~-;;o
i~J/iPO
llv'/~ [.?O
\Jj
15lJ//(7tJiJ
1/~)jJO
llt5/J1o
.JdJ/ 'Ln,J ,
It
\II
fJ0//6!111
~~~&Pu
I/ o'J;~]o
i'
\
157J/16tJO ,
,
\V
N,j),
ORGANIC CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
t, 0!91/ (; htJ/91/7 1/) tJIY'¥-Y. -,-u,,,:; '37 tv-3?ts
(~) ( 7>---. ( ~ )
UQ/1 u(;kg; UQ/1 £q/kq uq/1 fpg/kro
lA t.A-Dr .
' ;J..;l Lt "10~0
1_.,
I i I
\ \:/ \II
I .A fA lA
It It I
\u ' \
1?~/,ff~ ... "4.;'/.1~7 J {A_
/ /
I J -Estimated value. K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
~oi'IL/Y
33kt
(J)
UQ/1 tlQ/kg)
_(A-:;.-
I
\I/
ld_
I
"ll
_l,.,j_
L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
I U-Material was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the Minimum Detection Limit. NA -Not analyzed.
1/ -Tentative identification. £1·-On NROC list of Priority Pollutants.
I N. c. V-i.v.i..o-i.on o0 Hect.Uh SeJLv-i.c.e.-6
VHS 3068-0 (4/86 Labo~o~y)
&:,~; 9s-tJ £. c;r/9s-/
:l3C7 3?tY
_LL> .-f....t )
(q/lluQ/kQ 'uQ/1) uo/kq
..._-I .A ~/II IF
I
\ \ II
LA AlA-
I/
' ' lA N'A-
I
DRA
F
T
I
I
BASE/NEUTRAL AND ACID
EXTRACT ABLES
STATE LABORATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUHAN RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 28047-306 N. WILMINGTON, ST •• RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
-ORGAN!C CHEHICAL ANALYSIS
LAB NO !(001_95.~ /; Ol'(s-J hol'ts-0 ~ 0/y.).f
FIELD I 337/ sYbr 3]72 337~
TYPE _( .Sl j 3) ( ") (/J--
/
/
V> COftPOONO
UNITS pg/1 (pg/kg) pg/1cPg/lcg) pg/1 ~/leg )Jg/1 (uq/lcq hQ/1 )Jg/lcg
lni trosodimethylcwni ne fA LL /V, ~ {A
s (2-ch loroethyl)ether -
2-chlorophenol
~nol 3-dichlorobenzene
1 4-dichlorobenzene I r,-<lkhl•robe•z ... s(2-chloroi l)ether
xach1oroethane if,..,.,_.,; -n-oroovlami ne
robenzene
horone ·
2-nitrooheno1 I
14-dimethylphenol ~ •
s(2-ch1oroethoxvlmethane ,.
2. 4-dich 1 oropheno 1 ~-
1
~2 4-tri ch lorcbenzene
whthalene i
xachlorobutadiene --J
4-ch 1 oro-m-creso 1 '
lxachlorocvclooentadiene
4 6-trichlorophenol (:\
2-chloronaphthalene 'Vj
~~enaphthvlene methyl phthalate
"" 6-dinitrotoluene 1..'\
a :enaohthene 1',)
14-dinitroohenol ~
4-dinitrotoluene ' 4-n i tropheno 1
~rene hloroohenylphenylether ' diethy1 phthalate
~6-dinit~n!<Ol \
lphenylamine
obenzene
4-brarophenylphenylether
xachlorobenzene
tachloi"'phenol
phenanthrene . I
thracene \
butyl phthalate I 3~/c I I
fluoranthene \/ 0 'I/ \ I
1-Estimated val~Je. •
K -Actual value 1s known to be less than value gtven.
L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
1-Haterial was analyzed for but not detected. The nurber is the Hininun Detection Limit. -Not analyzed.
-Tentative identification. · ~ -On NRDC List of Priority Pollutants.
IC. V.i.v.U,.i.on o6 He.ilih seh.~.i.c.u
S 3068-0 (4/86 Labo~o~y)
//,p
/
/
V>
.4cit1 uQ/kQ
DRA
F
T
I
I
BASE/NEUTRAL AND ACID
EXTRACT ABLES
STATE LABORATORY Of-PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION Of-HEALTH SERVICES, N.C. DEPAR111EN1 OF HUMAN RESOURCES P.O. BOX 28047-306 N. WILHINGlON, ST., RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
ORGANIC a-tEHICAL ANALYSIS
I COHPOOND TYPE ( 5}-= <:J} -(~_) ( -;;r X) .A" )
I ovrene
benzidine -
butvl benzvl ohthalate
I benz(a)anthracene
chrvsene
3 3-dichlorobenzidine
I bis(2-ethvlhexvl)ohthalate
di-n-octvl Phthalate
benzo(b)fluoranthene
\
..J
~
benzo(k)fluoranthene ~
I benzo(a)ovrene
i ndeno (1. 2 3-cdl ovrene
dibenzo(a.h)anthracene
" ,.)
~ I I I 1/
I benzo(Q.h iloervlene ~ u 'I I 'J
aniline
I benzoic acid
benzvl alcohol
( nl\ lA A IVA-_l
'01
4-chloroani tine ••
I dibenzofuran
2~thvtnaohthalene
2~thvtohenol
. 1
\
.... ~
I 4~thvlohenol
2-nitroani tine
3-nitroani tine
\!_ ....
4-nitroani line I . I 1/
I 2.4.5-trichloroohenol
-"' l/ "" \
I
J11J 1/ -Ill .P. n,a m "" .,-" ... ..,. 7.1?33 :r fA /Y "f ;;lK t 511,:;.. JJ, ~,.,..,
I 1\, I I vv
\
I
I
I
I J -Estimated value. K -Actual value is known to be less than value given. L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U -Material was analyzed for but not detected. The nlll"ber is the Hininun Detection Limit. I NA -Not analyzed. 1/ -Tentative identification. ~I -On NROC List of Priority Pollutants.
I N.C. V.i..v.W.i..on o0 HeaUh svw.i..c.u
VHS 3068-0 (4/86 Labo~o~y)
17
DRA
F
T
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STATE LABORATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. WILHINGTON. ST •• RALEIGH. N.C. 27611
PURGEABLE COHPOUNDS LAB NO
FIELD I
COHPOOND TYPE
UNITS
ch 1 oranethane /CD-
brananethane ;OV
dichlonodifluoromethane hl-V'O
vinyl chloride /()0
chloroethane )tJO
rrethvlene chloride ~'f)
trichlorofluoromethane 1/Jo
ethene 1 1-dichloro /;£)
ethane 1 1-dichloro-
1 2-trans-dichloroethene
chloroform
ethane 1.2-dichloro-
ethane 1.1 1-trichloro-
carbontetrach1oride
bromodichloromethane
propane. 1.2-dich1oro-
1.3-trans-dichlo ne
trichloroethylene
ch1onodibromomethane
benzene
ethane 1.1 2-trich1oro-I/
1.3-cis-dichlo ne ' 2-chloroethv1 vinyl ether jtJ/)
branoform 5Zl
ethane 1 1 2 2-tetrach1oro-
ethene. tetrachloro-
toluene
chlorobenzene i
ethv1benzene l/
acetone /0~
2-butanone /00
carbondisulfide j"C;
2-hexanone /00
4-roethv1-2-oentanone /DO
stvrene ~?)
vinyl· acetate loa
o-xvlene -~
)'11./.X-
N.C. Division of Health Services
DHS 3068-o (4/86 Laboratory)
ORGANIC CHEHICAL ANALYSIS
/,{)/ CJ4/P !tJIJ /CJJ./.-7 /IJ/)/qiffj' biJJC!lJ-6
3363 ~?3C.£ 3?(,~-?3 ::4 /,.,
( 5) ( /) ( -=3) (3)
ug/1 (iigtlcg_ ugtl(ug/Jcg ug/(ug/JcgJ pg/lclJg/kg
;:-lA .-t l..L/-
,v 1/
·---~L-r·-· , . ..-/ .:t...Y.;-
().._...-fA-
C--../ fjJ
:;-o _.).0 /
'\I/ \ v .JI \ v
{_,._ vc.---LA ...... l.}-/"
/ / /
\ 1/ ·,v \ k". _... L
(pO (q5f (;f) q_t;:;
7:l_t.,:P ·-q =3 7/
( I ) (_.l)")
l(ilg!VuQ/kQ uQ/1 dCl/ko
u.:;-(.A..~
/
,
..
... I ,v-
lA.-~
,v ,v
DRA
F
T
I
STATE LABORATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH
I DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUHAN RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 28047-306 N. WILHINGTON. ST •• RALEIGH. N.C. 27611
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PURGEABLE COMPOUNDS
COHPOOND
ch 1 oranethane
brananethane
dichlorodifluoromethane
vinvl chloride
chloroethane
methvlene chloride
trichlorofluoromethane
ethene. 1.1-dich1oro
ethane. 1 1-dichloro-
1 2-trans-dichloroethene
chloroform
ethane. 1.2-dichloro-
ethane 1 1 1-trichloro-
carbontetrachloride
bromodichloromethane
orooane 1 2-dichloro-
1.3-trans-dichlo ne
trichloroethvlene
chlorodibromomethane
benzene
ethane 1.1 2-trichloro-
1 3-cis-dichlo ne
2-chloroethvl vinvl ether
bronoform
ethane. 1.1.2.2-tetrachloro-
ethene. tetrachloro-
toluene
chlorobenzene
ethvlbenzene
acetone
2-butanone
carbondisulfide
2-hexanone
4-methvl-2-oentanone
styrene
vinvl acetate
o-xvlene
_"'} -../) 11 ,.._.,/);-, .ffloJ.'
I I
I J -Esttmated value.
LAB NO
FIELD I
TYPE
UNITS
I ;:::
v-
t\'
I;-"
~
"[
,---...
11\
\ ""]\
I ~
\J\
~
~
~·
:::. -\
~/
ORGANIC CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
fn (jjQ_,-._-;s (n()/Cf_L)L-/-7n7ilQ.;.{ /
:j ~t '1 ~37'l-i770 /
-( .3) ( {o l -(7> Yl
ua/1 U<f/ka IJuoll lUotkd ua/1 GOlka IA:ral1 uo/ko
(;:t;::::;7' IV I,.___-=
v / 1/"
'"'-!J.../ u.-
,I/ ,v I/
(-) (+-) c-::>
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L-Actual value-is known to be greater than value given.
U -Material was analyzed for but not detected. The nUTber is the Hininun Detection Limit. I NA·-Not analyzed.
1/ -Tentative identification. £! -On NRDC List of Priority Pollutants.
I N.C. Division of Health Services
DHS 3068-Q (4/86 Laboratory)
/ 7 7
(/l T/1'
A1'<!11 ua/ka l..tttl/1 ua/ko
DRA
F
T
I
~-C. Department of Human Resources
livision of Health Services .. .. ·-·-SAMPLE ANALYSES REQUEST
i.LDi.YI'-1 /L_(.··Ly
State Laboratory of Public Health
P. 0. Box 28047
306 N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, 27611
_J'I/ ' b. -, ,-J /1 --., "7 r: l rt: Number __;_;r;r~:tt:51C-:JC:::::::z6t6:?f= .. =6-rL-------Field Sample Number .......;. ______ ?.:_·~z:..__._...:.J_,(..,_} _____ _
arne of Sire -L~1""l;-,· J«---r.j-Z...J,t~1_ .... /)~.-_·._.,J,,.L;+-7---./<-L.) ._,· :....' <u24r,1-P.L----Site Location !??a,·-·'? z, 1 .6-,, > /l/ l;
-') I ' I ) )
l ollected By /(l..T /)c b-"f'lJ,; ID# V~ Date Collected 'vl&ev c?, dkk:. ., :1
ype of Sample: -)
Environmental 1---Groundwater ( 1)
---Surface Water (2) I Soil (3)
__ Other (4)
Concentrate
_L_ Solid (5)
__ Liquid ( 6)
__ Sludge (7)
__ Other (8)
Comments
7/j clHi: Cc ,E H::il mn:it'o.:~ ( .
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Extractables
Parameter
./Arsenic
../Barium
_LL, Cadmium
ll Parameter
_P&T:GC/MS
__ Acid:B/N Ext. II= TOX
--
It
Results mg/1
<:o.t
<o, I
Results mg/ 1
MICROBIOLOGY
Parameter
_.iL Arsenic
-..LBarium
........L.Cadmium
~hloride
~Chromium
__ Copper
__ Fluoride
__ Iron
.....L..Lead
__ Manganese
-LMercury
__ Nitrate.
_d._ Selenium
<o.'
<-=r .. r
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Parameter Results mg/1
_EDB
__ PCB's
__ Petroleum
__ Endrin
__ Lindane
Total
Parameter
Silver
__ Sulfates
__ Zinc
_Ph
__ Conductivity
_ms
_Toe
Parameter
__ Methoxychlor
--Toxaphene
-2.4-D
__ 2,4,5-TP (silvex)
--
RADIOCHEMISTR'f
Time (') ;/ s·~---
Results mg/ 1
Parameter Parameter Results PCi/1
IE(MF) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis __ Gross Alpha
(MPN) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis __ Gross Beta
----
ll= --
.
Date Recdved ------------------Date Reponed -~d~_.L._ ..... /l~, _~_V\7. 7f..:....~--=J_·,c_. ·-----------1 c >art· Extracted------------------Date Analy:cd -------------------
Reported I3y
I>! IS 1l<ll (R.,vist·J 7/85)
:>•>lhl ;~n,J Ha:ar,lnus Wastt" ( R.,,.i~w 71tH)
Lab Number ; 45Bb JUl :0 t:r-.
\
.2.0
DRA
F
T
I
N. C. Department of Human Resources livi~ion of Health Services . .. . . SAMPLE ANALYSES REQUEST
/ 2 I) .i J.-'·-/ 7 L r. !-'j
State Laboratory of Public Health
P. 0. Box 28047
306 N. Wilmington Street
-_;-tt1L:.::·· bti'·~,~~--~· ·~Ge-=:3/~t _______ F•"eld Sample Number 2 i. t/'l I rli~:::;;i:: ;;;·:oZD---z~ ... -.. ,~; bu01o SiteLoca:ion /J?a,..~., z,,,-:..,1--~/(' It /) <-<-+ v I I (...l.!. ":? ;
Raleigh, 27611
C II dB ~' ..f-/\..;.:> /J!" r 1 ID# ·~-~~~ D C II d .-/' /1 ;:; '1. 0 "' o ecte y ;· ~~A {).._ fr6J,.. "r ~-ate o ecte :> v--<'6( QJ r (U·.:;
I 3F
I··. ,
Time -r:J_.~.;...· _'_'-__
ype of Sample:
Environmental Concentrate
I Groundwater (1)
Surface Water (2)
I Soil (3) / y
Other (4)
Extractables
Parameter
../Arsenic
../Barium
Cadmium
I~ Parameter
_P&T:GC/MS
~~---Acid: BIN Ext.
1-TOX.
--
Results mg/1
( 0./o <o· t <.o .o,;,-
<o. 1
Results mg/1
Solid (5)
Liquid (6)
Sludge (7)
Other (8)
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Parameter
~Arsenic
___.L Barium
_...,L Cadmium
~hloride
~Chromium
__ Copper
__ Fluoride
__ Iron
....LLead
_· _Manganese
~Mercury
__ Nitrate.
_.::..L Selenium
J.B
l[. 7=
<o.J
( 'l.1
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Parameter Results mg/1
_EDB
__ PCB's
__ Petroleum
__ Endrin
__ Lindane
I MICROBIOLOGY
Parameter . Parameter IF (MF) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis __ Gross Alpha
--(MPN) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis __ Gross Beta
--II= --
Comments
Total
Parameter
__ Zinc
_Ph
--Conductivity
_TDS
_TOC
Parameter
__ Methoxychlor
__ Toxaphene
_2,4~0
--2,4,5-TP (silvc:x)
--
RADIOCHEMISTRY
Results mg/1<.9
Results mg/1
.
Results PCi/1
I
I
l ate Received Dare Reponed --=-~_....:1'---f±~ilA'----ll'J'-l.Lf~' (::!...---__ _
atl" Extracted-------------------Date Analy:ed ---,--;-;::~=---;:-;-;----:----------
---------------LabNumber 14 587 JULiO~;[ l l."ported By
HS }101 (Rt"\'NJ 7185} :2-/
.;..,,J,,t "n.l J~:.:-ar~~,, .. ~ \~·!''-rt· rR,.vi ... u..-7/P./\
DRA
F
T
I
:--1. C. Department of Human Resources
l i•·i$ton of Health Services . . SAMPLE ANALYSES REQUEST
/ .. : /' '·/' J, •/ :.~·: ·:-) _!. ]. y
State Laboratory of Public Health
P. 0. Box 28047
306 N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, 27611
·JA · \ -r-u ~ / 1 -=--..... .!-t.r, jitt" Number _ _;.,t.~.._r...~::::;ll!tt.l :==::::!1 ::!•~-~, 7'::f_ ______ Field Sample Number -:--------~'--''-' ---~-· ------
lame of Site {/,£ 70 /) ..... '10] f>urJ:JCl SiteLoca:ion. /J7a,~--,' Zr7.m.q /\/(;
12 " · f :.-. . 1_ ·~ _; ,
Collected By t' a..l-ur: Co_r.t}= ID# ~ Date Collected /v.YI/ ,{ ,!jrQ: -.., l ) I 3F ype of Sample:
Environmental 1---Groundwater ( 1)
---Surface Water (2) I ,./' Soil (3)
__ Other (4)
Concentrate
__ Solid (5)
__ Llquid .. (6)
__ Sludge (7)
__ Other (8)
Comments ,
.-i?-~ ( .. ·" .--_."../ s . ) .• l "" • ( .,.
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Extrac:ta hies
Parameter Results mg/1
((),I
Cadmium < Q. 0 s=
<O,QC
<o.o~
< 0. (
~ ..... t>.aoc
ll Parameter Results mg/1
_P&T:GC/MS IE Acid,B/N Ext. TOX
--It MICROBIOLOGY
Total
Parameter Results mg/1<, Parameter
~Arsenic
_..LBarium
_._L. Cadmium
~hloride·
..J..L Chromium
__ Copper
__ Fluoride
__ Iron
....LLead
__ Manganese
~~ercury
__ Nitrate.
~Selenium
;l. r
< ;;} . .s:
'Lb
< ~.c
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Parameter Results mg/1
_.EDB
__ PCB's .
__ Petroleum
__ Endrin
__ Lindane
.
_,_Silver
__ Sulfates
__ Zinc
__ Ph
__ Conductivity
_TDS
_TOC
Parameter
__ Methoxychlor
__ Toxaphene
_2,4~0
--2,4,5-TP (silvex)
--
RADIOCHEMISTRY
. ., .
Time .J.I~(~..-:..;,.~_· "_·_· __
Results mg/I<j
< ;;l.S:
Results mg/1
Parameter Parameter Results PCi/1 II=" (MF) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis __ Gross Alpha
__ (MPN) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis __ Gross Beta
--II= --.
ate Recdved Date Reporred d.-d-. 1-ltu~ rdt,
I u
latl" Extracted -----------------'-----Date Analy:ed -----:----:--=-::::---:-:------------
; 4588 JUL 1 G Sc;'· -------------------Lab Number " l cported By
H~ 31QI (Rniscd 7185)
.._,,1,,1 .,..,,f J-f.,~ .. ,.,~,, .. c: \'(/<Jc:rt• fR.-v;.-u• 7 /R.7\
DRA
F
T
I
~-C. Department of Human Resources li~·ision of Health Services . . . . SAMPL~ ANALYSES REQUEST
/ ~~~ Y.:ft v / 2.. & ..'-Y
State Laboratory of Public Health
P. 0. Box 28047
306 N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, 27611
l'itc:: Number ..,,J.!J.:}:~·(;:::'·~?~0~1 =:·:::::"f~:zi~?t:• z;:f.1::_ ________ Field Sample Number ...,----------::-,_.lf___.·/'-. _L_: _ . ..,:!.):__ ____ _
a me of Site (/.L 70 /).: .... , i O'J ,/'>I I OJ. (1 Site Loca•ion ,/J?o,.~/' z ( 7 rh ');? /V( '). a -1\ /} "~...... ...... 11 :; ,. -, Collected By ;-Cl..f Ue A<2.f't ID# ~ Date Collected !Y-.u "L r1 6'£.:
""· l J I 36
/ [·,· yO Time"""---'==----
Yt:-e of Sample:
Environmental 1---Groundwater ( 1)
---Surface Water (2) I ./soil(3)
___ Other (4)
Concentrate
__ Solid (5)
---Liquid (6)
--Sludge (7)
__ Other (8)
Comments
I
II INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Extractable& Total
Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/K9 Parameter Results mg/:Ks
. /Arsenic (D. D ( _1L Arsenic <':l.O ~Silver < ;)_ -~-bBadum {. a.l __..L Barium ;l.._() __ Sulfates
Cadmium (o_.o.~ ...-L. Cadmium -<~.s-__ Zinc
Chromium < Ql D.~ ~hloride ..... _Ph I ../Lead ~ ()_. l ~Chromium i.f-,!).. --Conductivity
pMercury < (},(})__ __ Copper _TDS
Sdenium ( O.D() \ __ Fluoride _Toe
1 :......:..L Silver ~ o_.o~ __ Iron --
-==
_.L_Lead ~-() --__ Manganese --
L-Mercury < tJ II --,-__ Nitrate ·--~':)I,\ --....::..L Selenium --
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY II Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/ 1 Parameter Results mg/1
_EDB __ Methoxychlor _P&T:GCIMS IE Add,B/N Ext. __ PCB's __ Toxaphene
TOX. __ Petroleum _2,4-D
__ Endrin --2,4,5-TP (silvex)
__ Lindane --It-MICROBIOLOGY RADIOCHEMISTR"{
1 Parameter Parameter Results PCi/1 n= (MF) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis __ Gross Alpha
__ (MPN) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis __ Gross Beta
IE --
--
3ttc> Recciv~d Date Reported !21 it~ ~~ -fl l:<tt: Extracted------------------
I ... t·portcd 13y
i;" ll'>t ( R~\'IS~d 7185)
Date Analy:ed ----.,-r,...-,~:--....-;;;-;----------/4589 JU[ iG SL
Lab Number ------------------
-• : "'~"•·' J...l.,.,,.,,.t,,,,C. \"(/"tCf'l• (Q,..,;,.u• i /Q.i\
I
DRA
F
T
IQL:~
-....:2
I N. C. Iftp:~rtment of Human Resources ~d
Division of Health Services SAMPLE ANALYSES R c..~
/ 2-iJ '7 J I Y 1 2-~: i Y
State Laboratory of Public Health
P. 0. Box 28047
306 N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, 27611
lsite Number jf'-cfdr_~
.~rune of$rte, .. ·{JC.f· 7o h~u ,n
iotie~·~i_::·.@ ;i!Pc-f14<A
~ ype of Sample: · . · · . / .-, ··:;: .•. ..
:·~··Enviro~mmtal·(· ·. ·· · I ?·_.-. {··Ground~ter~_(l)
-~·Surface•'Water .;(2) "·\ . ' I ·---~-.... ·'Soil"'.£3)
i
. --,~·-Other PH ·• . .f
Concentrate
__ Solid (5)
__ Liquid (6)
__ Sludge (7)
__ Other (8)
Field Sample Number 3 Z U Y
Site Locadon Lf!:_ "t:t1: ~ /1/ <? ;
Date Collected ·:}(AL~jf/9z/. -Time / j ~--~ ~
Comments
/11/;·r,,a ce.s. ul£ if
,,, ; INORGANIC CHEMISTRY I
Extractables
I Parameter Results mg/1
__ Arsenic
__ Barium
I __ Cadmium
__ Chromium
__ Lead
I __ Mercury
__ Selenium
__ Silver
I --
----1-
I
I
Parameter
_P&T:GC/MS
-Acid:B/N Ext.
_TOX
--· --
Results mg/1
I MICROBIOLOGY
Total
Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1
--..lL" Arsenic <-a., ~I -Lsilver <c .. c.-~
_L.Barium <c, I __ Sulfates
~Cadmium -<d). ~~.s;-__ Zinc
__ Chloride _Ph
_:L Chromium -< c!). C) l __ Conductivity
__ Copper _TDS
__ Fluoride _TOC
__ Iron --
./Lead <.Ob'3 --__ Manganese ---lL. Mercury <1.2 ,tz{}C)R --__ Nitrate. ---.L Selenium ~ o,oo.s---
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Parameter Results mg/ 1 Parameter Results mg/1
__ EDB __ Methoxychlor
__ PCB's __ Toxaphene
__ Petroleum _2,4~0
__ Endrin __ 2,4,5~TP (silvex)
__ Lindane --
Parameter Parameter
RADIOCHEMISTRY
Results PCi/1
:..:: .. •.
__ Gross Alpha
__ Gross Beta
, 'j.-~ ..
Date Received ________ !.._,.\ :..:....;.~_-_?_;:..:...~ ._~._:;_.: _.·_· .. _-~'_.:: .,..:·'~-.:....=; ,_: __ Date Reported __ --..~.7_' ..... {...;;~_;.-_8_,_6 __________ _
IDate Extracted --------\-<:.-,~~>:7':·'·:::-------,..,.::··~·:~:.,..~:.:....>_' __ Date Analyzed ------"T--r-i-..-:-:,--......-:-:----------
Reported By ---------~·_·.:;;_.~.;.:t~~:v_<:'T...;..;E·'--(.::::~:;....;._·~;..r_· __ Lab Number _____ J_4_._6_4_5_J_U_L_!_l_· _u_e ____ _
IDHS 3191 (Revised 7/85)
Sulid ~nJ Ha%ardous Waste (Review 1 181)
DRA
F
T
1 / J IA .. <....Jl.'l: ,,~-· ~ , •... 1 1 ... -...-1 f.,.,.._ ~~-11 , . _, .__,
:--:.C. Department of Human Resources
IDi~·ision of Health Services
I "2--
SA~PLE ANALYSES REQUEST
State Laboratory of Public Health
P. 0. Box 28047
306 N. \Vi\mington Street
Raleigh, 27611
1~/. .. "· • t> '-7-F~ ,· u ?,) !~ ~ :._i ;::; ;· ,-.. < -Site Number -r--.3--"o!:"--'"'-:..!--l.J._--'I.;L-J_'-'.r_c_-f.--f...l.~;.>·_.,_~·-:.L..._L+------Field Sample Number ) L: J
I~ a me of Site { I' ( '7(1 l\ r· I 01, u 1/ 0:4) Site Location )I) rJ ( --r :.' t ( rh .·; AI ( l V ' I J '
Collected By ,Ke,·tf__j)].lJ·-kt.) lD# C I DateCollected 'J-,,2-!ft_,
ITvpe of Sample:
Environmental
I. Groundwater ( 1)
Surface Water (2)
I J Soil (3)
Other (4)
Concentrate
__ Solid (5)
__ Liquid (6)
__ Sludge (7)
__ Other (8)
Comments
&.--,..., ;,· ,/..._ .f.·,,;('
I
I
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
I! Extractables Total
Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1<\J Parameter
____::Arsenic < {). 0 l ~Arsenic .~2D ~ilver
~Barium (J .. l ---=::.:Barium l.s-__ Sulfates
__..L_ Cadmium ---=...:::Cadmium ~;)_I '1-__ Zinc
Time ~ /'700
Results mg/I<j
< J..., 't
I ~~.~~ ~Chromium __ Chloride. ~Ph I"s v~f.icr'eiAi= S:e. ...,.., lr.
{. 0.! l /_3 I
I
I
-->..L~ Lead
......::::::.._Mercury
/
1 -:/ Selenium
j :./_s_iivcr
1--1--·--li-I
I
I
Parameter
_P&T:GC/MS
--Acid:B/N Ext.
_TOX
--. --,j
<a·Qd--
5.. a. o.o.~' ~ o. o!{"'
Results mg/1
___._:'Chromium --Conductivity
__ Copper _TDS
__ Fluoride _TOC
__ Iron --_,_.Lead ;1.2 --__ Manganese --~Mercury <O. I --__ Nitrate --
_;L_ Selenium (_ '::1. t Y. --
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1
_EDB --Methoxychlor
__ PCB's __ Toxaphene
__ Petroleum _z,4,D
__ Endrin --2,4,5,TP (silvex)
__ Lindane --
I i ;
i
I I
I
I MICROBIOLOGY RADIOCHEMISTRY ,.---------P-a-r~a-m_c_t_e_r~------------------------------~---P-a_r_a~rn-e_t_e_r _______________ R_e_s_u_l_ts~P-C_i_/_1 ________ ___
1--(MF) Coliform Colonies/lOOmls
__ (MPN) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis
____ Gross Alpha
__ Gross Beta
1-
Dare Recdved ---------------------Dare Reported -----4/Z>..::.~..:::)~J:,.=_,,c..../2-!-J-/4{.~~~--J.Jt......:.~-'-· -----1 Date Extracted ---------~----------Date Analy:cd -----;-.....-;.....-,.;;-;::;-----;rrr--;-~~------
1 459Q JUL ; c 8L Rt·poned By I DH5 31 llJ ( R~vi~c:J 7/85)
Lab Number
:;,,! .. ! >nJ Ha:~rdnus \Vast<· ( Revkw 7/87)
DRA
F
T
I
N. C. Department of Human Resources State Laboratory of Public Health
l )ivision of Health Services SAMPLE ANALYSES REQUEST P. o. Box 28047
306 N. Wilmington Street
/") · Raleigh, 27611
llfite Number ~·'-;1Q;:=::!:""=..,./....,)'---~-c/'-.J_.;.y'l-• ..L/_YL-~-/--',J-C._...:"-· _,_:,_) -'f-1-----Field Sample Number -:-----..... ·.:_').~...._9~· C'-'~(..,:..._ ______ _
IIJamc of Site _,...,.' ''-'-/""".J"-' ·_ . ..t.,/_...0'--J-I...c.).r...G_._.t_.,'-'q'-J-..J.[).._L_. '-''''---o~;j'I-:J.L.----Site Location /l?eJ · ·ya.; -6: .. -, ;L'\
A / . /1'1 ' . /7-,..:) -'!"/, Collected By · e 1 I L fL. ·r •· /r ·· ' ID# _....,(_·-4-1---Date Collected ---L--..t..-'«>~--'-""'-z.___...~~---Time J ype of Sam pi;:
'/ . I (': < ;
Environmental Concentrate
i"\ I ___ Groundwater ( 1)
---Surface Water (2)
__ Solid (5)
__ Liquid ( 6)
_d_ Sludge (7)
__ Other (8)
/, 7 • [)t't~l
I __ Soil (3)
__ Other (4)
Extractables
Parameter Results mg/ 1
~Arsenic .
~Barium <o· <o .Q,s -_l.L Cadmium
__L Chromium <o. as.-
-~:.Lead <,2. l
-~Mercury ~o.od-
._.,... Selenium = Qe {J_s-
..... ./ Silver < ().Q~-
I Parameter Results mg/1
_P&T:GC/MS
--Acid:B/N Ext.
I _TOX
--
I MICROBIOLOGY
Parameter
I __ (MF) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis
--(MPN) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis
--
I --
/ ' . . .'fnr c e c J; c?'.-lu}]
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Total
Parameter Results mg/1:(-' Parameter Results mg/ 1('~
~Arsenic --l.L'Silver
/Barium __ Sulfates
....-'Cadmium __ Zinc
__ Chloride LPh
--.LChromium {. J_t_r __ Conductivity
f.6
__ Copper _TDS
__ Fluoride _Toe
__ Iron
~Lead ('i.e Cf
__ Mangar.ese
...._LMercury <o • t
__ Nitrate
__L Selenium ~ -:2. S"
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Parameter Results mg/ 1 Parameter Results mg/1
_EDB __ Methoxychlor
__ PCB's __ Toxaphene
__ Petroleum _2,4~0
__ Endrin __ 2,4,5·TP (silvex)
__ Lindane --
RADIOCHEMISTR¥
Parameter Results PCi/1
__ Gross Alpha
__ Gross Beta
----
:2 2. l!f.'hl !I Date Received ------------------Date Reported -----'"~"-->. ..... c:A-"-',... --'~'-f-....... _£lA...c.--g-'-7f--LL(}__0~----
IDatt· Extracted Date Analyzed ---..,.-"TT-n~...,.MT--r...,..-T""Y-------
Reported Dy Lab Number 1 L1591 JUL IG bb
lllHS 3191 (R .. vis.-J 7185)
~uli.J an<l Hazardous \Vastl" (Revil"w 7/87)
DRA
F
T
I
I . C. Department of Human Resouret:s
ivision of Health Services SAMPLE ANALYSES REQUEST State Laboratory of Public Health
P. 0. Box 28047
306 N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, 27611 I l-
l itc Number ,.,.A?=-..... · _J· -L(_\____,:f-j--''"'-f_./-J.y' _ _,_/-'2=--. -'U,..",_· ...::.?._~ _<{...__ Field Sample Number ..:..· _. ------=-:::J_,<-.f:~--~oi-.:.·;_·.L./ ____ _
( .• 1"1. '\ J) ? , '( Name of Site _...,ll~'..L--e.J __ ,r...< ....l<...:·-~L_.l~·---....:~~ul:..::.?l..J..-_...~-"-LJ~,:....: .... n:...t,-4p!..L.--Site Location --.~1'---'' _.·.·_1 ... t.i'---J-r-._/1._.<._'7-+-/r-'-"-:; .c..G.L'-:r-~1...:;"'-· ·"'-=·~-----
l .ollected By _L_:.:.../JJ....:.... __ J"7-_..r...l..:.3....J,_._ . .:...IL;:.;t-::...·....l(._,:.t::-~10# --· Date Collected _·...,·.~J_.,...z.J-'-,uf_--..t.f.L.., __ • ___
7
_ Time------
ype of Sample:
I Environmental Concentrate
---Groundwater (1) __ Solid (5)
Comments
{~-f-,%Ju·ci ,.,fVtl"t ,~-c::#
Surface Water (2) /
I ~Liquid (6}
Soil (3) __ Sludge (7)
__ Other (4) __ Other (8)
II INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Extractables Total
I Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter Results mg/1
__ Arsenic ~Arsenic <IJ. ~ \./"'Silver < t .. a
I __ Barium -=.:.Barium <:J.. .o __ Sulfates
__ Cadmium ~Cadmium S:: L.,{J __ Zinc
__ Chromium __ Chloride -LPh ~--'3
___ Lead ~Chromium =-:jiS <LtD __ Conductivity
I ---Mercury __ Copper _TDS
__ Selenium __ Fluoride _TOC
__ Silver __ Iron --
I ----.LLead <:'Cl_.Q --__ Manganese --
~Mercury < O.cJJ-----
I --__ Nitrate. --~Selenium (J. 0 --
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
I Parameter Results mg/1 Parameter
_P&T:GC/MS __ EDB
~--Acid: BIN Ext. __ PCB's
_TOX __ Petroleum
__ Endrin
1-__ Lindane
MICROBIOLOGY
Parameter
--(MF) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis
--(MPN) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis
~ate Received
.)atl" Extracted ________________ ___.:.. __
(
<·ported Dy
HS ~Jill (Rt·vis.,d 7 'HSJ :>.7
Soli.! and Ha:arJnus \Vast<• ( R.,vit•w 7 /H7)
Results mg/1
Parameter
__ Gross Alpha
__ Gross Beta
Parameter Results mg/1
--Methoxychlor
__ Toxaphene
_2,4,0
--2,4,5~TP (silvex)
--
RADIOCHEMISTRY
Results PCi/1
Date Reported ----...;>..,-~:::..._--'--+-...k<.,;~r-..LL-=------­
Date Analyzed ----.--:Mr-r,......---n-r,...-~--r--------
J 4592 Jm: ~.[ ~·~
Lab Number
DRA
F
T
I /-;-~ T-b /( (.v / 1-/I_} J ;.·
•. C. Department of Human Resourn-s
IJivision of Health Services SAMPLE ANALYSES REQUEST State Laboratory of Public Health
P. 0. Box 28047
306 N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, 27611
I . . - / -J --·' --"7 ., 9 itt: Number _;L...:..o. :s~)-L/...:\_L.L~....c' '...Lf-s..(_y'-7L--.LZ__..2~._.,(p"'-' ..::t:_::/"--'(j-'----Field Sample Number ----------:..::.)--'-_..1.,..-L-' ....:'-L-----
Namc of Site -1-l ..... ! ............ (_-~-/~C:....1 -.b;.....<.:<./:.....>o<Uc..Lt..Ln-+-....,,"/-") ....... ...;.1L..O::...J..,.tAt-J""-----Sitt: Location ____./.'---'?_.1 r ........... -~~7-· ·,_,;' ''-"·£....c(l .......... L._· ·~--· '7'} ~·t!:..·--:!(..._1 ______ _
l 'ollected By [ IJJ 17 /3.• .. -,:(.., ftz.ly ID# v --Date Collected 7-2 .. -: t' (,.
ype of Sample:
Time ____ _
I Environmental Concentrate
___ Groundwater ( 1) ~Solid (5)
•'/ ~/()
---Surface Water (2) Liquid (6)
I __ Soil (3) __ Sludge (7)
_ Qc01 (.:;~n.e n ?'' , c < 121
__ Other (4) Other (8)
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
I
I
Extractables
Parameter
~Arsenic ~Barium
~Cadmium
~Chromium
-~Lead
__,.L Mercury
-4Selenium
~Silver
Parameter
_ P&.T:GC/MS
--Acid:B/N Ext.
_TOX
Resuhs mg/1
zo .os= <o. o.s-
<O.o ..
? o. aor <0. ('/5)
Results mg/1
1-
MICROBIOLOGY
Parameter
__ (MF) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis
__ {MPN) Coliform Colonies/lOOmis
Parameter
_._L'Arsenic
__L.Barium
....J..L Cadmium
__ Chloride
....:..L_ Chromium
__ Copper
__ Fluoride
__ Iron
.-:IL.. Lead
__ Manganese
_:,..L Mercury
_,Nitrate · ·
.....:L Selenium
Total
Results mg/ ~ Parameter
~·silver
--Sulfates
--Zinc
.....L...Ph < d.. ~S: __ Conductivity
_TDS
_TOC
<s-.o
Results mg/K.9
Y.t
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Parameter
_EDB
__ PCB's
__ Petroleum
__ Endrin
__ Lindane
Results mg/ 1
Parameter
__ Gross Alpha
__ Gross Beta
Parameter Results mg/1
--Methoxychlor
--Toxaphene
_2,4-D
--2,4,5-TP (silvex)
--
RADIOCHEMISTRY
Results PCi/ 1
I Date Rect:ived
Date Extractt:d ------------------
Date Reported __ _...""'--'"...fr-~.,._t--"""'-4'¥---=j)=--0-----­
Date Analyzed ---.,--:-=,....,.------,--,-----------
I Reported By
!HIS 1l'>IIR.-vis.-,J7/85)
Lab Number J 4 59J JUl I U 56
:-,,1,.1 and Hazardnus \Vast<' ( Revi.-w 7 /87)
DRA
F
T
I
I
11
Location of Sampling:
-·-·-----"' --___ ;...,_ ... ~ --.:.\."iJ..\,.:.:_
SOLID AND F~ARDOUS WASTE YJl~AG~T BRANCH
Chain of Custody Record
Hazardous Waste ~2terials
Generator __ Transporter
_Storage Facility __ Disposal Facility
_____ Treatment F~cil:
_____ Landfill
I _Lother: J).ru ,1--. 1\Ltvr-;p
Corr.puny' s Name_4:(,..-j·/~Luf~_-_7~1J-=--------:------Telephone (:.....--_) _______ _
l .!..ddn~:: ::_ /?2 '' ,/?. clA .-/o Q A' f, , T , . :~
I Coll.::.-:•;:>r's Hame
7
4 .... -c-/).c /Zo.r/:1-'Tele_ohone(f/'i) 753-2d"O /
signature
Date :. ... :npled T/)~6j ~· / 1 cf .(, Time Sampled t2 fQ; -.// 2,. ~-
I Type o£ Process Generating Waste _____ ~c~/~17~~~~~1/.~. ~t~~~"~tJ~-----------------.. y I Field .lnfo~atio~
./) C(/01 a'-' I !!1fd ,_ -
1-
I :Fleld S:nmple No. 37tJO 37!JI
I Chair~ ..:.f Possession:
12.
I
3.
I
signature
signature
,..--. IResu~/~~
... s~~
370:1.. 3703
1/ct/t~. --z/;o!Jt
::tnclus~ve dates
title iilClusivi dates
title inclusiye dates
7 ~ title
. . 1/ I Inst::-w:tions: Complete all applicable information including signc.tures, and
I
submit.with·2nalysis request_ forms.
I
DRA
F
T
SOLID .Al'ID HAZARDOUS WASTE Y.:ANAGEMENT BRANCR
I .
Chain of Custody Record
I Hazardous Waste ~~terials
I ~ocation of Sampling: Generator
Storage Facility
\/Other: ;)rl/07
__ Transporter
____ Disposal Fac~!ity
))1,/h a
___ Treatment Yzci1
___ Landfill
~ I I
Company's Name;..._-.J..{-'j:l-..5s....t.L--· _7-J,._;c!..<1:.___------------Telephone (. __ """")---------
I Addr~::::·r-. /27o."fa,4 A:>n. A/ l , I ~'J I
I Colle<:r.or' s Hame j/-e.ifL_ /)1 cz..rkr .S
I signature
Dn te ~~.:..:npled~_·_. -7~~-·,..!::-z,::::;.._----=:·' .G;:;..P~G,c:.__ ________ Time Sa.mpled_-J/'--7~D:P........,.~---
I Type o£ .Process Generating Waste __ ~L!~L2~~tt~~~<U~~~-~1~1~/7-1··------------~~---------
v I Field Informatio~ ·.
~~~-4' f-&~ /::eJrL/hn.df~£. --7:..7.--[_J.)
I
I
I
Chain L•f Possession:
ResulLs reported
signature
title
. ~/~/~ be-:= /·~-v . title
title
·.
inclusive dates
date
!nst;:-uctions: Complete all applicable information including signatures, and
submit.with~nalysis request. forms.
30
DRA
F
T
I
I
I ~ocation of Sa~pling:
.• -. ---""'·· --___ • .;.::._..,_~_ _;._!\ v J..\...~-
Chain of Custody Record
Hazardous Waste Y~terials
Generator TranS?orter
___ Storage Facility ____ Disposa~ Facili~y _Landfil!
I _Lather: /)ru t?l _ I!J ucryp .
C ciiipa r~y' s Name __ -__;::,U....;.....;S'=-_· ___ 'f-/.. ~-0-=---------------Telephor.e ( ) _______ _
I .:..adrc:::!:. ltki'>c~ a A --ffin. ;VCP ·
_ . ', , 7 E/?J-e·z;;~/ /?t.o,~t: .. .rcv--f cf:..-.,-rt.~ ?'a.:t7~ /Zoul/-collc.: • .Jr s.hame ./311 • f-t: / t?af'-0 I Tele_pho~e( 9/<J') 7:::?3-2/o 1 I -~!m:e ·
Date f. ... :npled 7--;:;?, -cf C-TilDe S2.!!lpled ________ _
I
I
I
I
Type of _Process Generating·waste __ ~L~)~;~7~h~'-~-J~·~~·r~~=~~>~~~-----------------­
\'
Chair ..
2.
3.
\.,f Possession:
s~gnature
'J-"b·-0 { h /lJ./.; rr.=-el h 4-t '!L(Jt-4-l=f(c_; _
dt~ ~c..<:.t'(l-e.--et1 &-7 .&.r-t.k /1.orr.r ?-9-crr: ..
3?-D/{
7-:.f-dt --z -/c) -eft,
~nclusive dates
title
title inclusiye ciates
Complete all applicable information includ~ng signatures, and
submit_with"2nalysis request_ forms.
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX C
I REFERENCES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.
(HW-10) US EPA, 1
1982, p. 31180.
2. State Laboratory of Public Health, NC DHR, Raleigh, NC. Laboratory
Results: Soil, waste, and groundwater samples collected July 8, 1986.
Site Investigation: US 70 Drum Dump, Morganton, "t--.'C, CERCLA Unit, NC
DHR, Raleigh, NC.
3. Summary Trip Report: Site Investigation, US 70 Drum Dump, Morganton,
NC. Letter from Pat DeRosa, NC CERCLA Unit, to Denise Smith, US EPA
Region IV, Atlanta, GA, July 16, 1986.
4. Laboratory results from Advanced Chemistry Labs, Atlanta~ GA, to
HAZTECH, Inc., r.ecatur, GA, April 6, 1987. HAZTECH Project/!:
321-87-636.
5. Sax, N.I. Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 6th edition.
Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, NY, 1984.
6. USGS 7 ~5 ' Quadrangle Maps: Glen Alpine, NC, 1962; .Marion East, NC, 1962.
7. Letter and attachments, from Warren T. Parker, US Fish and Wildlife
Service, to Pat DeRosa, NC CERCLA Unit, June 21, 1985.
Memo to CERCLA Unit Staff, from Pat DeRosa, NC CERCLA Unit, August 12,
1986. Telephone conversation with John Fridell, US Fish and Wildlife
Service.
Federal Register, Volume 51, No. 133, Friday, July 11, 1986 p.
25219-25223.
8. Meiro to file from Pat DeRosa, NC CERCLA Unit, June 15, 1987. Personal
communication with Dick Caspar, Water Supply Branch, NC DHR, Raleigh, NC.
9. NC Department of Transportation map, Burke County, NC.
10. Memo to file from Pat DeRosa, NC CERCLA Unit, June 16, 1987. Telephone
conversation with Leslie Miller, Agricultural Extension Service, Burke
County, NC.
11. Fieldnotes and photographs: Site Investigation, US 70 Drum. Dump,
Morganton, NC, July 8, 1986. Pat DeRosa, NC CERCLA Unit, Raleigh, NC.
12. Memo to file from Pat DeRosa, 't--.'C CERCLA Unit, June 16, 1987. Telephone
conversation with Robert Brown, NC r1ildlife Resources Coumission, Burke
County, NC.
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
13. Heath, R.C., 11Basic Elements of Groundwater Hydrology with Reference to
Conditions in NC, 11 1980. US Geological Survey, Water Resources
Investigations, Open-File Report 80-44, Raleigh, NC~
14. l1emo to file from Pat DeRosa, l\"'C CERCI.A Unit, June 18, 1987. Telephone
conversation with Mario DeLuca, .Agricultural Extension Service, Mclliwell
County, N::.
15. l-'.Emo to file from Pat DeRosa, NC CERCLA Unit, July 1, 1987. Telephone
conversation with Carol Walsh, EPA Region IV, Atlanta, GA.
16. Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifests, 0636A, 0636B, Generator
//NCTMP0001334, US EPA Region IV/fMy. 70 Site, Atlanta, GA.
17. Sumsion, C.T. and Laney, R.L., ''Geology and Groundwater Resources of the
Morganton Area North Carolina,'' Groundwater Bulletin No. 12, March
196 7. Prepared cooperatively by the Geological Survey, US Department of
the Interior, and the NC Department of Water Resources.
18. Well records, Burke County, 1968-1982. ~~resville Regional Office,
Groundwater Section, Division of Environmental .Manageirent, NC Department
of Natural Resources & ColliilUility Developrrent, Mooresville, NC ~
19. ~ to file from Pat DeRosa, NC CERCLA Unit, June 22, 1987. Telephone
conversation with Eric Klingel, Groundwater Section, DEM, NC NRCD,
Mooresville, NC.
20. Memo to file from Pat DeRosa, l\"'C CERCLA Unit, June 16, 1987. Telephone
conversation with Wade Knox, Water Supply Branch, NC DHR, Black
Mountain, NC.
21. Meoo to file from Pat DeRosa, NC CERCLA Unit, June 18, 1987. Personal
cOlliilUilication with Martha Moore, Water Supply Branch, NC DHR, Raleigh,
NC.
22. Memo to file from Pat DeRosa, NC CERCLA Unit, June 15, 1987. Telephone
conversation with Glen Berry, City of Morganton, NC.
23. Memo to file from Pat DeRosa, NC CERCLA Unit, June 16, 1987. Telephone
conversation with Danny Henson, Brentwood Water System, Morganton, NC.
24. . Burke County Tax Maps, 1987. Burke County Tax Office, Morganton, :t\1C.
25. Memo to file from Pat DeRosa, NC CERCLA Unit, July 20, 1987. Telephone
conversation with Louise Greg, Burke County Tax Office, Morganton, NC.
26. Memo to file from Pat DeRosa, NC CERCLA Unit, July 20, 1987. Telephone
conversation with Danny Henson, Brentwood Water System, Morganton, NC.
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. I
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
27. Memo to file from Pat DeRosa, NC CERCLA Unit, July 20, 1987. Telephone
conversation with Joe Silver, Mcfuwell County Tax Off"ice, Marion, :t-."'C.
28. · NC State Government Statistical Abstract, 5th Edition. NC State Data
tvJanagement. Raleigfi-;Nc, 1984.
29. Preliminary Assessrrent: US 70 Drum Dump, lv:lorganton, NC, July 3, 1986.
Mary Giguere, NC CERCLA Unit, Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch,
Raleigh, NC.
30. 40 CFR Part 302, July 1, 1986. Table 302.4-'~ist ot Hazardous
Substances & Reportable Quantities".
31. Memo to file from Mary Giguere, NC CERCIA Unit, July 3, 1986. Telephone
conversation with Keith Masters, Solid & Hazardous Waste Management
Branch, Bakersville, NC.
32. letters to Carol Walsh, EPA Region IV, Atlanta, GA, from Pat DeRosa, l\"C
CERCI.A Unit, Raleigh, NC, August 21, 1986, October 6, 1986, October 30,
1986.
1-'.emo to Lee Crosby from Pat DeRosa, NC CERCIA Unit, October 31, 1987,
December 2, 1987, March 2, 1987. Re: US 70 Drum Dump • DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/ Ref. 3
James G. Martin, Governor
Phillip J. Kirk, Jr., Secretary
Ronald H. Levine, M.D., M.P.H.
July 16, 1986
Ms. Denise Bland
EPA NC CERCLA Project Officer
Air and Hazardous Material Division
345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30365
Dear Ms. Bland:
SUBJbCT: Summary Trip Report
Site Investigation, July 8, 1986
US 70 Drum Dump NC D981472624 us 70
t•tOrganton, NC 28655
State Health Director
The US 70 Drum Dump is located on US 70, approximately 0.2 miles
west of the Dysartsville Road intersection. The site is about 10 miles west
of Morganton and 2 miles east of the McDowell County line, within Burke County.
Approximately 25 to 30 55-gallon drums were discovered in a culvert
beside US 70 on July 2, 1986. A backhoe operator from the NC Department of
Transportation was attempting to clear debris from the entrance to a drainage
pipe running beneath the road \dten he hit the drums. Some material spilled
when the backhoe pierced the drums. One drum reportedly contained liquid that
coagulated when exposed to the air. A strong odor of chlorine or ammonia \vas
also reported. Preliminary waste samples were collected by Burke County
Emergency l~nagement and NC DHR/DHS, Solid and Hazardous Waste ~lanagement
Branch.
On July 7, 1986, NC CERCLA Unit personnel, Lee Crosby, Pat DeRosa,
and Mary Giguere visited the subject site. Keith Masters, NC DHR/DHS, Solid
and Hazardous Waste Management Branch, directed us to the site and provided
background information. \~e observed 25 to 30 rusted 55-gallon drums at_the
bottom of a 30 ft. embankment on the south side of US 70. 1he topography was
such that surface water would drain from the south onto the site and through
the culvert to the other side of the road. However, no surface water was
observed and the drain pipe appeared to be plugged with drums and debris.
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l•fs. Denise Bland
July 16, 1986
Page 2
'Iire5, hou!:iehold trash, and rolls of paper about 4 ft. wide, were also
observed in the culvert. 'i1te drums had been covered with a clear plastic tarp
and the eastern embankment had been taped off to discourage public entry to
the site. \'le met briefly with the McGalliard family, the mmers of the
property adjoining the site to the east. \v'e also met with Jim Crawley, the
site mmer. :Both land owners gave us their vermission to enter the property
and collect samples as needed. Neither l{ir. Cra\vley nor the McGalliards,
however, had any information as to the source or contents of the drums. Later
that day, we also met with Nick Waters and Dale :Murphy from Burke County
hr.lergency Jv1anagement to discuss the site.
On July 8, 1986, we met with ~1r. Crawley again to collect a sample
from an inactive well at his shop approximately 0.2 miles from the site. A
sample could not be obtained, however, due to a break in the pipe between the
pump and the tap. l~e then proceeded to the site, donned protective clothing,
and began sampling at 0950. At that time, the weather was sunny and hot
(approximately 90°F), with no noticeable wind. nvo waste samples were
collected from an accessible open drum and spill area. The drum contained
uhite rubbery chips and the spill appeared to be a greasy material with a
caramel-like consistency. Additional waste samples could not be collected due
to the physical hazard posed by the unstable drum and trash pile. HNu
readings monitored throughout sampling did not exceed background. A surface
soil samvle was collected 5 ft. south of the drums and a background soil
sample was collected approximately 150 ft. upgradient. The nearest well,
located at the residence of Ray Allison approximately 400 ft. west of the
site, was also sampled. Sampling \vas completed by 1130. Samples were
submitted to the NC State Laboratory of Public Health for organic and
inorganic analyses.
Observers on site during sampling included: Clint Patton, Burke
County Fire Marshall's Office; Jim Fulmer, Burke County l·1aintenance Engineer;
Steve foster, Burke County Training Officer for Emergency Management; Dale
I•leyer, Burke County Division of Solid Waste; and hlgie McGalliard, adjacent
property 0\mer. After sampling, we met briefly with Steve Foster to discuss
the site.
If you have any questions please contact me at [phone].
PD/tb/0221b
Sincerely,
~r be_;u)J +
Pat DeRosa
Waste Management Specialist
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch
. Environmental Health Section
DRA
F
T
I Ref. 4
•I ACL ADVANC,ED CHEMISTRY LABS, INC.
I OR. STEVE N. TSOUKALAS
CHIEF CHEMIST
I
HAZTECH, INC.
5280 Panola Industrial Blvd.
Decatur, GA 30035-4013
I Attention: Neville Kingham
I
I PARAMETERS (ppm)
I *Antimony .
*Arsenic
*Beryllium
I *Cadmium
*Chromium
*Copper
*Lead I *Nickel
*Selenium
*Silver I *Thallium
*Zinc
I
Cyanides
I Phenols
I
I *Total Metals
I
I
I
Soil #001
3796
~ .. ;;,;Jf
0.24
< 0.5
:l:'Z2r!
:i§.:Js.
< 1
.9L!r.»"
< 1
< 0.5
< 0.5
~9-lii-
< 0.5
< 1
P.O. BOX 88610 • ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30356
TELEPHONE (404) 455~1266
Client Project No.: #321-87-636
ACL Project No.: #0826
Date Received: 3/19/87
Report Date: 4/6/87
s & L #002
3797
< 0.02
< 0.005
0.02
0.19
0.39
0.29
0.15
0.03 < 0.02
< 0.02
0.79
< 0.5
< 1
S.lvaste #003
3798
... ~ ... 9~.
< 0.05
0.7
.... ~46 ..
33.8.,..·.i-
..25 .• 8' ~l..38,9
< 1
1.7
< 0.5 27Q.-~k -... _ ......
< 0.5
< 1
S{LC}-\IC.~ N . ftot.t{?rk.:~
Steve Tsoukalas, Ph.D.
Director of Chemistry
Page . 1 Of _6_
DRA
F
T
11 ACL
t R. STEVEN. TSOUKALAS
CHIEF CHEMIST
I
HAZTECH, INC.
ADVANCED CHEMIS11?Y LABS, INC.
P.O. BOX 88610 • ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30356
TELEPHONE [phone]
lcnent:
5280 Panola Industrial Blvd.
Client Project No.: #321-87-636
ACL Project No.: #0826
Decatur, GA 30035-4013
.Attention: Neville Kingham
Date Received: 3/19/87
Report Date: 4;6;87
1-----.....,--~-y-------r----, Sample Type : Soil Sample Type : S & L Sample Type : s Haste
Station # 001 Station # : 002 Station # : .Jo,L00'"'"'3..__
Sample #ACL: 3796 Sample #ACL: 3797 Sample #ACL : 3798
Results ( ppb ) Results ( oom •. iJ) Results ( ppb , I TEST REQUIRED
I GC/MS FRACTION •
VOLATILE COMPOUNDS
I Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Benzene < 10 ~ 1,0 ~ lQ
I
Bis (C~Ioromethyl) ether
Bromoform·
Carbon tetrachloride
< 10 .. ~ 1.0 ~ lQ
< 10 ~ l.Q ~ ]Q
< 10 < 1.0 5: 10
I Chlorobenzene
Ch lorod i-bromomethane
Chloroethane
< 10 ~ 70 •. 96-~.\tr· ~ 10
< 10 < 1.0 ~ 10
< 10 ~ 1.0 ~ lQ
I .2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Dichlorobromomethane
< 10 ~ 1.0 ~ ]Q
< 10 ~ 1,Q ~ ]Q
< 10 ~ 1,0 ~ ]Q
I Dichlorodifluoromethane
1, 1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
< 10 < 1.0 < 10
< 10 < 1.0 < 10
< 10 < 1.0 < 10
I 1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,2-Dichloropropylene
< 10 < 1.0 ~ 10
< 10 5: 1.0 ~ lQ
< 10 ~ 1.0 ~ lQ
I Ethyl benzene
Methyl bromide
Methyl chloride
I Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
< 10 bl005~ ~ lQ
< 10 ~ 1.0 ~ lQ
< 10 < 1.0 < 10
< 10 ]«86:;63~ < 10
< 10 < 1.0 < 10
< 10 < 1.0 .. ·. 79 (~
.I Toluene
1,2-Trans-Dichloroethylene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
< 10 .;28 • .a~ ~-· i·~ ~ 10
< 10 < l.d -~ lQ
< 10 < 1.0 5: 10
I 1,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
< 10. < 1.0 ~ 10
< 10 "103 7'' ~ < 10 ~,; .. . .. ~·:-:·,; .
Trichlorofluoromethane < 10 ~ 1,Q ~ 10
I Vinyl chloride
Xylene
< 10 ~ 1,0 ~ lQ < 10 ~o~3139lit < 10
Page ~2:} Of -f41-
DRA
F
T
•I ACL tR. STEVEN. TSOUKALAS
CHIEF CHEMIST
-I
HAZTECH, INC.
ADVANCED CHEMIS1RY LABS, INC.
· P.O. BOX 88610 it ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30356
TELEPHONE (404) 455·1266
i lclient:
5280 Panola Industrial Blvd.
Client Project No.: #321-87-636
ACL Project No.: /10826 Decatur, GA 30035-4013
I Attention: Neville Kingham
Date Received:
Report Date:
3/19/87
4/6/87
1------~--~~--~~--~ Sample Type : Soil Sample Type : S & L Sample Type : S ·Haste
I TEST REQUIRED
I GC/MS FRACTION •
ACID COMPOUNDS
I 2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphen.ol
1 4,6-Dinitro-0-cresol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
I 2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
P-chloro·M-cresol
I Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
1 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
I
I
I
I
I
I
Station # 001 · Station # : 002 Station # : ~00::::-:3~-
Sample #ACL : 3796 Sample #ACL : 3797 Sam·ple #ACL : · 3798
Results ( ppm Results ( ppm Results ( ppm )
< 0.1 < 1 < 0.1
< 0.1 < 1 < 0.1
< 0.1 < 1 < 0.1
< 0.1 < 1 < 0.1
< 0.1 < 1 < 0.1
< 0.1 < 1 . < 0.1
< 0.1 < 1 < 0.1
< 0.1 < 1 < 0.1
< 0.1 < 1 < 0.1
< 0.1 < 1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 1 < 0.1
Page 3 Of _6_
DRA
F
T
•I ACL ADVANCED CHEMISJ'RY LABS, INC.
I DR. STEVEN. TSOUKALAS
. CHIEF CHEMIST
I
I Client: HAZTECH, INC.
5280 Panola Industrial Blvd.
Decatur, GA 30035-4013
I Attention: Neville Kingham
Sample Type :
Station# . .
Sample #ACL :
Soil
001
3796
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TEST REQUIRED Results{ ppm
GC/MS FRACTION· BASE/
NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
Acenaphthene < 0.1
Acenaphthylene < 0.1
Anthracene < 0.1
Benzidine < 0.1
Benzo (a) anthracene < 0.1
Benzo (a) pyrene < 0.1
3,4· Benzo-fluoranthene < 0.1
Benzo (ghi) perylene < 0.1
Benzo (k) fluoranthene < 0.1
Sis (2-chloroethoxy) methane < 0.1
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether < 0.1
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether "< 0.1
Bis (2-ethyl-hexyl) phthalate ~ 0.1
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ~ 0.1
Butyl benzyl phthalate ~ 0.1
2-Chloronaphthalene ~ 0.1
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether < 0.1
Chrysene < 0.1
Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene < 0.1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 0.1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene < O.I
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene < O.I
3,3'-Dichlorobenzldlne < O.I
Diethyl phthalate < O.I
Dimethyl phthalate < 0.1
Di-N-Butyl phthalate < 0.1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene < 0.1
2,6-Dinitrotoluene < 0.1
Di-N-Cetyl phthalate· < 0.1
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine · < 0.1
)
P.O. BOX 88610 • ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30356
TELEPHONE [phone]
Client Project No.: #321-87-636
#0826
3/19/87
ACL Project No.:
Date Received:
Report Date: 4/6/87
Sample Type : S & L Sample Type : S. Hast
Station# . 002 Station # : 003 .
Sample #ACL : 3797 Sample #ACL : 3798
e
Results ( ppm ) Results { ppm )
< 1 < 0.1
< 1 < 0.1
< 1 < 0.1
< 1 ~ 0.1
< 1 ~ 0.1 < 1 < 0.1
< 1 ~ 0.1
< 1 ~ 0.1
< 1 ~ 0.1
< 1 ~ 0.1
< 1 ~ 0.1
< 1 < 0.1
< 1 s: Q 11
< 1 s: Q I] . < 1 s: Q I]
< 1 s: Q I]
< 1 ~ 0.1
< 1 < 0.1
< 1 < 0.1
~:~~· < 0.1
ttl8..3.. ijiL < 0.1
~.6Ji-;j < 0.1
< 1 < 0.1
< 1 < 0.1
< 1 < 0.1
< 1 < 0.1 < 1 $; 0.1
< 1 ~ 0.1
< 1 ~ 0.1
< 1 ~ 0.1
Page _4_ Of _6 __
DRA
F
T
~ ACL I ADVANCED CHEMIS1''RY LABS, INC. tR. STEVEN. TSOUKALAS.
CHIEF CHEMIST
I
l21ient: HAZTECH, INC.
5280 Panola Industrial Blvd.
11
Decatur, GA 30035-4013
Attention: Neville Kingham
II TEST REQUIRED
II GC/MS FRACTION· BASE/
NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
(CO NT' D) I Fluoran.th~ne
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene II Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
. Hexachloroethane II .
lndeno (1,2,3,-cd) pyrene
lsophorone II Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosodi-methylamine II N-Nitrosodi·N-propylamine
II N-Nitro-sodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrena
II
I
I
II
I
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Sample Type :
Station#
Sample #ACL :
Results ( PJ>m
< 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
< 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
< 0.1 < 0.1
< 0.1 < 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
Soil
001
3796
P.O. BOX 88610 • ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30356
TELEPHONE (404) 455·1266
Client Project No.: #321-87-636
ACL Project No.: #0826
Date Received: 3/19/87
Report Date: 4/6/87
Sample Type : S & L
Station # : 002
Sample #ACL: 3797
Sample Type : S. \·:as te
Station # : ..:::.00=3"---­
Sample #ACL : 3798
Results ( .. _ppm if
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
( 1
( 1
< 1
~·B5. tl
Results( ,
..;.ppm..-'
< 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< O.l
3.46
~ .. ..:...~~-w....Jt'
Page 5 Of 6
) DRA
F
T
~ ACL ADVANCED CHEMISTRY LABS, INC.
t R. STEVEN. TSOUKALAS
. CHIEF CHEMIST
I
· lclient: HAZTECH, INC.
5280 Panola Industrial Blvd.
11
Decatur, GA 30035-4013
Attention: Neville Kingham
P.O. BOX 88610 • ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30356
TELEPHONE (404) 455·1266
Client Project No.: #321-87-636
ACL Project No.: #0826
Date Received: 3;19;87
Report Date':· 4;6187
1------~--~~----~----Sample Type : Soil Sample Type : S & L Sample Type : S. Waste
Station# 001 Station # : 002 Station # : 003
Sample #ACL : 3796 Sample #ACL: 3797 Sample #ACL : 3798
Results( ppb ) Results ( ppb ) Results ( -.l, ppb ~> I' TEST REQUIRED
< 0.2 < 10 < 0.2 I GC/MS FRACTION·PESTICJDES
Aldrin < 0.2 < 10 < 0.2
< 0.2 < 10 < 0.2
< 0.2 < 10 < 0.2 I BHC-alpha
BHC-beta
BHC-delta < 0.2 < 10 < 0.2
< 0.2 < 10 < 0.2
< 0.2 < 10 < 0.2 I BHC-gamma
Chlordane
4,4'-DDT
< 0.2 < 10 < 0.2
< 0.2 < 10 < 0.2
< 0.2 < 10 < 0.2
< 0.2 < 10 < 0.2
< 0.2 < 10 < 0.2
I 4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDD
I Dieldrin
Endosulfan-alpha
Endosulfan-beta < 0.2 < 10 < 0.2
< 0.2 < 10 < 0.2 I Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin
< 0.2 < 10 < 0.2
< 0.2 < 10 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 10 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 10 < 0.2
< 0.2 < 10 < 0.2
< 0.2 < 10 498 G.
I Endrin aldehyde
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
·I
Toxaphene
PCB-1242
PCB-1254
PCB-1221 < 0.2 < 10 < 0.2
I PCB-1232 < 0.2 < 10 < 0.2
< 0.2 < 10 < 0.2
< 0.2 < 10 < 0.2
< 0.2 < 10 < 0.2
PCB-1248
I PCB-1260
PCB-1016
I
I Page 6 Of _6_
·I DRA
F
T
I
•I ACL
I DR. STEVEN. TSOUKALAS
CHIEF CHEMIST
I
IIAZTECJI, INC.
. (_ ?1/13 /;~7 .r-e;v_ -
ADVAJVCED CI-IEMIS1~RY. LAIJS, INC.
P.O. BOX 88610 • ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30356
TELEPHONE [phone]
Client Project No.: ·1 Client:
5280 Panola Industrial Blvd.·
Decatur, GA 30035 ACL Project No.:
Date Received:
#321-87-636
#0826
I Attention: Jack Scott · Report Date: 7/6/87
' ·' ~'
; I ,,
fi : .
I i I __ L...-_______________ __.__ _____________________ !_
-·I
I
I
I
I
1-
I
I
I J
. I~
'\ 4 I.
I
STATION: Soil #001 ' ·
ACL-#3796
EP-Toxicity Chromium = < 0.02
1/5 }0
. .. . 11'••'
,.
..
'
,, . -. . .. ,
. ,
.. ·' \.:
J t-i ~·
•',., • • " > I • f • I
.2~· --~u....IL..,..:L--L~~W9<.
Steve Tsoukalas, Ph.D .
Director of Chemistry
Page~ Of __
...
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
15 June 1987
TO: File
FROM: Pat DeRosa
RE: critical Habitats of Federally Listed Endangered Species in N.C.
I spoke by telephone today with John Fridel!, us Fish and Wildlife
service [phone] to request an update on critical habitats in NC.
~--~-~~.-7
Mr. Fridel! informed me that there have been no changes since our previous
correspondence of August 12, 1986. The "Proposal to List the Cape Fear Shiner
as an Endangered Species with Critical Habitats• in NC (FR Vol. 51, No. 133,
July 11, 1986) is expected to be finalized in the next month or so.
PD/tb/0338b
.·
DRA
F
T
I
I
I 12 August 1986
TO: CERCLA Unit Staff
I FRCM: Pat DeRosa ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RE: Critical Habitats of Federally Listed Endangered Species in N.C.
I spoke by telephone today with John Fridel!, US Fish and Wildlife
Service [phone] to request an update on critical habitats in NC~
Mr~ Fridel! informed me that the only change since our previous correspondence
of June 21~ 1985 has been a "Proposal to List the Cape Fear Shiner as an
Endangered Species with Critical Habitats" in NC~ (FR Vol. 51, No. 133,
July 11, 1986)~ A copy of the proposed rule is attached for you! information.
PD/tb/0221b DRA
F
T
I
~~:'·'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~~~-
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Pat Derosa
United State·s Departn1e~1t of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
E:t\DANGERED SPECIES FIELD STATION
100 OTIS STREET, ROOM 224
ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801
June 21, 1985
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Environmental Health Section
North Carolina Department of Human Resources
P. 0. Box 2091
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Dear Ms. Derosa,
In response to your telephone conversation with John Fridell on May 30, 1985,
we are enclosing the following items of information:
A. North Carolina county distribution records of Federally listed,·
proposed and status review species,
B. map of the critical habitat of the threatened spotfin chub
{Hybopsis monacha),
c. map of the critical habitat of mo~ntain golden heather {Hudsonia
montana), and
D. copy of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service interagency Section 7
consultation process guidelines (included for your information)
The abbreviations following the species names on the North Carolina species
distribution records {A~ above) indicate Federal status, i.e., E -endangered,
T -threatened, PE -proposed endangered, PT -proposed threatened and SR -
under status review. Status review species are not legally protected under the
Endangered Species Act. However, they are subject to being listed and agencies
should be cognizant of their potential presence in a projec~ area.
Since additions and deletions are made to the list of species on a regular
basis, questions regarding updates of the list should be made to this office.
We hope this information will be of use to you. If we can be of any further
assistance,· please call John Fridell or Nora Murdock at [phone].
,. Sincerely yours,
\\. ~C) vuONJ_ ~ -~~
Warren T. Parker
Field Supervisor
3
DRA
F
T
I
1 .......
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
5/78
-~
NORI'H CAroLINA -Critical Habitat
Hyl:x:>psis m:macha, "srx:>tfin chub"
!-'.aeon and swain Cotmties. Little Tennessee River, nain channel fran
the backwaters of Fontana Lake upstream to the North carolina-Georgia
state line.
. ~ .
.·
c: "'~aio t:o. -.,..... -----­-------Co ---Ma~oft •
...
C:ln C:11• 1. ""'-· ~uon Cu. . ---------r--·-----~-----------------: I Rabun Co. Town11 C:o. I
I I --­,
:'fORTH t:."-ROLI~ . .\ -----------ca:oRGIA
DRA
F
T
I
l~d~~:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~~~
I
I-
I
I
I
I
1:: .. :,W»2~
I
I
NORTH CAROLINA -Critical Habitat
Hudsonia montana, "mo~ntain golden heather"
Burke County. The area bounded by the following: on the west by the
2200' contour; on the east by the Linville Gorge Wilderness Boundary
11/80
north from the intersection of the 2200' contour and the Shortoff Mountain
Trail to where it intersects the 3400' contour at ''The Chimneys 11--then
follow the 3400' contour north until it reintersects the Wilderness
Boundary--then follow the Wilderness Boundary again northward until it
intersects the 3200' contour extending west from its intersection with
the Wilderne~s Boundary until it begins to turn south--at this point the
Boundary extends due east until it intersects the 2200' contour.
• I lloltsiO
Lun,lle hila
PISGAH
~ ~ • -~
_,.~.l~~'!J.N.!Jt~\._._ ------_)
L ----___ __j \ ~ .
~ . ' .. ----,\
/ /
DRA
F
T
- - -
I Spotfin Chub
---
Mountain Golden
Heather
US 70 DRUM DUMP
NC D981472624
-
1 inch = approx. 53 miles
- --- -- -CRITICAL HABITATS OF FEDERALLY LISTED
ENDANGERED SPECIES "IN NC
STOKES ROCKING·
HAM
-·-- - -
DRA
F
T
. . I Federal Register I Vol. 51, No. 133 / Friday, July 11, 1986 I Proposed Rules 25219
c ... I R=-c ... X100
7. Bibliography
Eq.15A-A
1. American Society for Testing and
I Materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standards.
Part 31: Water, Atmospheric Analysis.
Philadephia, Pennsylvania. 1974. p. 40-42.
2. Blosser. R.O .. H.S. Oglesby, and AJ<.
I Jain. A study of Alternate S(h Scrubber
Designs Used for TRS Monitoring. National
Council of the Paper Industry for Air and
Stream Improvement, Inc.. New York, New
York. Special Report 77-{)5. July 1977.
I 3. Curtis, F .. and G.D. McAlister.
Development and Evaluation of an ·
Oxidation/Method 6 TRS Emission Sampling
Procedure. Emission Measurement Branch,
Emission Standards and Engineering I Division. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park. North
Carolina· 27711. February 1980.
4. Gellman, LA Laboratory and Field Study
I of Reduced Sulfur Sampling and Monitoring
Systems. National Council of the Paper ·
Industry for Air and Stream Improvement, · ·
Inc.. New York. New York. Atmospheric .
Quality Improvement Technical Bulletin No. I 81. October 1975.
5. Margeson. J.H.. J.E. Knoll. M.R. Midgett. D.B. Ferguson, and P.J. Schworer. A Manual
Method forTRS Determination. Journal of Air
I Pollution Control Association. 35:1280-1286:
December 1985.
[FR Doc. 88-15268 riled 7-10-86: 8:45am]
8IU.ING CODE~~
I DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Ash and Wildlife Service I 50 CFR Part 17
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife ·
and Plants; Proposal to Ust the Cape
I Fear Shiner as an Endangered Species ·
with Critical Habitat
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior. I ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The Service proposes to list
the Cape Fear shiner (Notropis
I mekistocho/as) as an endangered
species with critical habitat under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended. This fish has recently ·
I undergone a reduction in range and
population. It is currently known from
only three small populations in the Cape
Fear River drainage in Randolph. Moore,
I Lee, and Chatham Coun~ies, North
Carolina. Due to the species' limited
distribution, any factor that degrades
habitat or water quality in the short
I river reaches it inhabits-e.g., land use
changes, chemical spills, wastewater
discharges, impoundments, changes in
stream flow, or increases in agricultural
I
I
:onoff--could threaten the species'
survivial. Comments and information
pertaining to this proposal are sought
from the public.·
DATES: Comments from all interested
parties must be received by September
9, 1986. Public bearing requests must be
received by August 25, 1986.
ADDRESSES:.Comments and materials
concerning this proposal should be sent
to Field Supervisor, Endangered Species
Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 100 Otis Street. Room 224,
Asheville, North Carolina 28801.
Comments and materials received will
be available for public inspection, by
appointment, during normal business
hours at the above address. ·
FOR FURTHER INFORJ.,AnON CONTACT:
Richard G. Biggins, at the above address
(704/259-0321 or.FrS 672-{)321).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMAnON:
number of individuals that periodically.
drop down from the population above
Locksville Dam pooL · ·
The second population, represented
by the collection of a specimen near
State Highway Bridge 902 in Chatham ·
County, is located above the Rocky
River Hydroelectric Dam. This
population was historically the best. but
the area yielded only the one specimen
after extensive surveys by Pattern and
Huish (1985). The third population was
found in the Deep River system in
Randolph and Moore Counties. This
population is believed to be small ·
(Pattern and Huish 1985, .1986). Three.
individuals were found above the
Highfalls Hydloelectri~ Reservoir; one
in Fork Creek. Randolph County, and ..
two in the Deep River, Moore County. · .
The species was also found downstream -
of the highfalls Dam. Howeyer, the . :
extent of suitable habitat in this stream
Background reach is limited,·and it is thought that ..
The Cape Fear shiner (Noropis these individuals likely result from .~-·
mekistocholas), the only endemic fish downstream movement from above the
known from North Carolina's Cape Fear reservoir where Cape Fear shiner
River drainage, was discovered in 1962 • habitat is more ~xtensive. · ",.-· · _: , ..
and described by Snelson (19n). This . The Caper Fear shiner is small,' rarely· · •..
fish bas been collected from nine stream exceeding 2 inches in length. The fish's .
reaches in North Carolina (Bear Creek. . body is flushed with a pale silvery ... · '. · . . . .
Rocky River, and Robeson Creek, yellow, and a black band runs along its .
Chatham County; Fork Creek. Randolph sides (Snelson 1971). The fins are
County; Deep River, Moore and yello~sh and somewhat pointed. The:~ ·
Randolph Counties: Deep River, · upper lip is black, an~_the lowerlip .· ·
Chatham and Lee Counties: and Cape bears a thin black bar along it.s,m~
Fear River, Kenneth Creek, and Parkers The Cape Fear shiner, unlike niost other .
Creek. Harnett County (Snelson 19n, member3 of the large genus Nop-opis, ··. _; . : . .-:_::::_·.
W. Palmer and A. Braswell, North feeds extensively_in plant ma,terial, an!l . ·;_ ·.<·;· · · ·
Carolina State Museum ·or Natural its digestive tract il! mo~ed for this .:i. ~·-· · .:·;: · ·_ .
History, personai communication igss; · diet by having ail elongated. convoluted' ·· ...
Pattern and Huish 1985, 1986). Based on . intestine. The species is generally · . · · : ...• T •
a recently completed Service-funded associated with gravel, (:OQble, and ·.··· · ·' ,· -~
·study (Pottern and Huish 1985, 1986) boulder substates and bas been
involving extensive surveys in the Cape observed to inhabit slow pools. riffles,:
Fear River Basin (including all histone and slow runs (Snelson 19n, Pottem · ..
sites) and a review of historical fish and Huish 1985). In these habitats, the
collection records from the Cape Fear, species is typically associated with · ·
Neuse, and Yadkin River systems, the· schools of other related species. but it ls
fish is now restricted to only three never the numerically domin~t.species.
populations. The strongest population Juveniles are often found in Blackwater,
(101 individuals collected in 1964 and among large rock outcrops in mid-
1985) is located around the junction of stream, and in flooded side channels ...
the Rocky River and Deep River in and pools (Pottern and Huish 1985]. No
Chatham and Lee Counties where the information is presently available on
fish inhabits the Deep River from the breeding behavior, feeundity, or
upstream limits of the backwaters of longevity.
Locksville Dam upstream to the Rocky The Cape Fear shiner may always
River then upstream from the Rocky have existed in low numbers. However,
River to Bear Creek and upstream from its recent reduction in range and its
Bear Creek to the Chatham County Road small population size (Pottern and Huish
2156 Bridge. A few individuals were 1985, 1986) increases the species'
collected just downstream of the vulnerability to a catastrophic event.
Locksville Dam. but because of the such as a toxic chemical spill. Dam
limited extent of Cape Fear shiner construction in the Cape Fear system
habitat at this site, it is not believed this has probably had the most serious
is a separate population. Instead, it is impact on the species by inundating the
thought these fish represent a small species' rocky riverine habital Dams
7 -: . .>::-:._~-~
-•• ·• .:· .. -!"' · ... · ,-:=.:
DRA
F
T
I~:
'/'. ,.,
I
1·. ::·. i i ~
I ~ .i I •l r.: ; .
t .r i . li !.
. I
,,, .
25220 Federal Register I Vol. 51, No. 133 I Friday, July 11, 1986 I Proposed Rules
presently under study by the U.S.
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers (COEJ, for the Deep River and
changes in flow regulation at existing
hydroelectic facilities could further
threaten the species. The deterioration
of water quality has likely been another
. factor in the species' decline. The North
·.Carolina Department of Natural
Resources and Community Development
(1983) classified water quality in the ..
Deep River, Rocky River, and Bear
Creek as good to fair, and referred to the
-Rocky river below Siler City as an area
. where their sampling indicates
-degradation. That report also stated:
"Within the Cape Fear Basin, estimated
average annual soil losses from . :
·cropland ranged from 3 tons per acre in
· . . the lower basin to 12 tons in the
headwaters." The North Carolina State
· Division of SoU and \Vater Conservation
: considers_5 tons of soil loss per acre as .
_ .. the maximum allowable. · . . ·
_.. · .. ·: ·The Cape Fear shiner was one of 29 · ·
· ~. · fish species included in a March 18, ·
;.~:
' 1975, Notice of Reliew published by the
Service-hi-the Federal Register (40 FR _
-12297). On December 30, 1982, the . ~Service aruiounced in the Federal·-·
· · Register (47 FR 58454) that the Cape
·. Fear shiner, along with 147 other fish
species,·was being cbilsfdered for': . -~
possible addition to the list of ·· . · ··
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. ·
· OnAprll4, 1985, the SerVice notified .
Federal, S.tate, ·and local governmental ·
agencies ilnd Interested parties that the
· AshevUle Endangered Species Field
Station was reviewing the species' .
status. That notification requested · •
information ori the species' status·and ·
threats to its continued existence. ·
Twelve responses to the April 4, 1985,
notification were received. The COE,
Wilmington District; North Carolina
Division of Parks and recreation,
· Natural Heritage Program; and the North
· Carolina State Museum of Natrual' · · · ·
History provided for the species. ·
. Concern for the species' welfare was
· ·.also expressed by private individuals; '
The other respondents provided no
information on threats, and did not take
a position on the species' status. The
Cape Fear shiner was included in the
Services' September 18, 1985, Notice of
re\-iew of Vertebrate Wildlife (50 FR
. 37958) as a category 1 sp_ecies, indicating
that the Service had substantial
biological data to support a proposal to
list the species as endangered or
threatened. ·
Summary of Factors Affecting the
Species : . . .
Section 4(a)(l) of the Endangered
Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and
regulations (50 CFR Part 424) ·
promulgated to implement the listing population is unknown. The third
provisions of the Act set forth the population, located in the Deep Rh·er
procedures for adding species to the system in Moore and Randolph
Federal Lists. A species may be Counties, is represented by the
determined to be an endangered or collection of six individuals (Pottern and
threatened species due to one or more of Huish 1986). Three individuals were
the five !actors described in section taken from below the dam. As the
4(a)(IJ, These factors and their available habitat below the dam is·
application to the Cape Fear shiner limited. it is believed these fish are·
{Notropis mekistocholasJ are as follows: migrants from the upstream population.
A. The present or threatened ·Potential threats to· the species and its
destruction.-modification, or. curtailment habitat could come from such activities
of its habitat or range. A review.of as road construction, stream channel ·:
historic collection records {Snelson 1971, modification, changes in stream flows.
W; Palmer and A. Braswell personal . for hydroelectric power,' impoundments,
communication 1985), along with recent land use changes, wastewater
survey results (Pattern and Huish 1985, discharges,· and other projects in. the ·
1986), indicates that the Cape Fear. · . watershed if such activities ·are not · · ·.
shiner fs presently restricted to only planned and implement with the
three populations (see ''Background" survival of the species and the
section). Three historic populations have protection of its habitat in mind. The · ..
apparently been extirpated (Po !tern and species is also potentially threatened by
Huish 1985, 1986). Robeson Creek, two U.S. Army Corps of Engineers·.'. ·--
Chatham·co!lJlty, was believed lost' · ·.--projects presently under re\-iew for the
when Jordan Lake flooded part of the Deep River. The Randleman Dam ..
. creek. The reasons' for the loss of . ,". . project would consist of a reservoir pf ..
-populations· from Parkers Creek and·~-_: the Deep Ri\·erin Randolph County,· ' ·
Kenneth creek in Harnett County are... · above known'Cape Fes·r shine~ ~abita~ .
not knoWn. The shiner has also not been The Howai'lis Mill Reseriroir would be
recollected (Pottem and Huish 1985] on the Deep Ri\·cr in Moore' and
· from the Cape Fear River in Harnett: : . Randolph Counties and waul~ flood
County. ·However, review of historical: . · presently used Cape Fear shiner habitat.
and current collection reeords reveals· ; . B. Overutilizalion for commercia/,
that only-one specimen has ever been · . · recretitiond, &cicntific. or eductillonal
collectedfrom this river, and the fish . · purposes: Mosfof the present rari.ge· of_·-
likely was a stray individual from im .. · .. · the Cape Fear shiner is relatively .
.upstream or tributary population. Since inaccessible and ~verutilization of the.
much of the Deep, Haw, and Cape Fear species has not been and Is not .
Rivers and their major tributaries has expected to be a problem. . . . . , ,
been impounded for _hydro.electric, .. . • · . C. Dfs~ase or predation. Although the
power; and much of the rocky sboql -Cape Fear shiner is undoubtedly .
habitat inundated, other populations consumed by predatory animals, there fs
and population segments that were no evidence that this predation is a. ·
never discovered have likely been lost. . threat to the species. ·
to these reservoirs.. D. The inadequacy of existing
·. Of the three remaining populations, regulatory mechanisms. North Carolina
only the one located around the . State Jaw (Subsection 113-272.4)
confluence of the Deep and Rocky prohibits collecting wildlife and fish for
Rivers in Chatham and Lee Counties scientific purposes without a State
(inhabiting a total of about 7.3 river permit. Howe\·er, this State law does not
·miles) appears strong (Pottern and. · protect the species'. habitat from the
Huish 1985). The second population in ' potential impacts of Federal actions.
the Rocky River, above the Rocky River Federal listing will pro\·ide protection
hydroelectric facility, was the source of for the species under the Endangered
the type specimens used to describe the Species Act by requiring a Federal
species (Snelson 1971). Historic records permit to take the species and requi;ing
(W. Palmer and A. Braswell, personal Federal agencies to consult with the?
communication 1985) reveal that Service when projects they fund,
collections of15 to 30 specimens could authcrize, or carry out may affect t.l-te
be expected in this stretch of the Rocky species.
River (State Route 902 or Chatham E. Other natural or manmade factors
County Road 1010 Bridge) during a affecting its continued existence. The
sampling visit in the late 1960s and early major portion of the best Cape Fear
19i0s. Pottem and Huish (1985) sampled shiner population is located at the
the Rocky River throughout this reach junction of the Deep and Rocky Rivers
on numerous occasions and were able to in Chatham and Lee Counties. A major
collect only one specimen.' The reason toxic chemical spill at the U.S. Highway
for the apparent decline in this 15-105 Bridge upstream of this site on
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--Federal Register I Vol. 51, No. 133 I Friday, July 11, 1986 I Proposed Rules 25221
the Rocky Rh•er could jeopardize this
population, and as the other populations
are extremely small and tenuous, the
species' survival could be threatened.
The Service has carefully assessed the
best scientific and commercial
information available regarding the past.
present, and future threats faced by this
species in determining to propose this
rule. Based on this evaluation, the
preferred action is to list the Cape Fear
shiner (Notropis mekistocho/as) as an
endangered species. Because of the
species' restricted range and
vulnerability of these isolated
populations to a single catastrophic
accident, threatened status does not
appear to be appropriate for this species
(see "Critical Habitat" section for a
discussion of why critical habitat is
being proposed for the Cape Fear
shiner) .. ·
Critical Habitat
Critical habitat, as defined by section
3 of the Act means: (i) The specific areas
within the geographical area occupied ·
by a species, at the time it is listed in
accordance with the Act. on which are
found those physical or biological . · ..
features (I) essential to the conservation·
of the species and (II) that may require
special management considerations or
protection, and (ii) specific areas outside
the geographical area occupied by a
species at the time it is listed, upon a
determination that such areas are ·
essential for the conservation of ~e-
species. . . . . .
Section 4(a)(3) of the Act requires that
critical habitat be designated to the
maximum extent prudent and_ . .
determinable ct1ncurrently with the
determination that a species is ·
endangered or threatened. Critical
habitat is being proposed for the Cape
Fear shiner to include: (1)
Approximately 5 miles of the Rocky ·
River in Chatham County, North ·
. Carolina; (2) approximately 8 miles of
Bear Creek. Rocky River, and Deep
River in Chatham and Lee Counties,
North Carolina: (3) approximately 6
miles of Fork Creek-and Deep River in
Randolph and Moore Counties, North
Carolina. ·
(See "Regulation Promulgation"
section for this proposed rule for the
precise description of critical habitat)
These stream sections contain gravel.
cobble, and boulder substrates with
pools, riifles, and shallow runs for adult
fish and slackwater areas with large
rock outcrops and side channels and
pools for juveniles. These areas also
provide water of good quality with
wl~tively low silt loads. .
Section 4(b)(8) requires, for any­
p:-oposcd or final regulation that
designates critical habitat, a brief
description and evaluation of those
activities (public or private) that may.
adversely modify such habitat or may
be affected by such designation.
Activities which presently occur within .
the designated critical habitat include,
in part, fishing; boating, scientific
research, and nature study. These
activities, at their present use level, do
not appear to be adversely impacting
the area. . .
There are also Federal activities that
do or could occur within the Deep River
. Basin and that may be affected by
protection of critical habitat. These
activities include; construction of
impoundments (in particular, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers reservoirs under
study for the upper Deep River), stream·
alterations. bridge and road. · ·
construction, and discharges of
municipal and industrial wastes, and
hydroelectric facilities. These activities
could, if nolcarried out with the · · · ·
protection of the species in mind,
degrade the water and substrate quality
of the Deep River, Rocky River, Bear
Creek. and Fork Creek by increasing
siltation. water temperatures, organic
pollutants, and extremes in water flow.
H any of these activities may affect the ·
critical habitat area and are the result of
a Federal action, section 7(a)(2) of the ·
Act, as amended, requires the agency to
consult with the Service to ensure that
actions" they authorize, fund, _or_ ~rry .
Section 7(a) of the Act, as amended,
requires Federal"ageqcies to evaluate·
their action_s with respect to" any species
that is proposed or listed as endangered
or threatened and with respect to it .
critical habitat, if ariy is being proposed
or designated. Regulations implementing
this interagency cooperation provision
of the Act are codified at 50 CFR Part
402 (see revision at 51 FR 19926; June 3,
1986). Section 7(a)(4) requires Federal
· agencies to confer informally with the
Service on any action that is likely to .
jeopardize the continued existence of a
proposed species or result in the · -
destruction or adverse modification of
proposed criticalhabitat.lf a spec~es is
subsequently listed, section 7(a)(2) ·
requires Federal agencies to ensure that,
activities they authorize, fund. or carry
out are not likely to jeopardize the ' · ·
continued eXistence of such a species or
to destroy or adversely modify itS · ·
critical habitat If a Federal action may
affect a listed species or its critical . -
habitat. the responsible Federal agency
must enter into consultation with the
Service. The Service is presently ·aware
of only two Federal actions under
consideration (Randleman and How8rds
Mill Reservoirs) that may affect the ·
species and the proposed critical ;··· ·.
habitat. The Service has been in cOntact--.
with the U.S. Army Corps of Engiiu~l!rs · . ·,_. ·
concerning the potential impacts of·:.'·
these projects on lhe species ·and its · · !· • ~ ~ · ·
· out. are not likely to destroy or . · ·
adversely modify critical habitat. -. · · ·
Section 4(b )(2) of the Act requires the
Service to consider e·conomic and other -
impa-cts of designating a particular area
as critical habitat. The Service will
consider the critical habitat designation
in light of all additional relevant
information obtained at the time Qffinal
rule.
habitat. The Act and iniplementin8 --~ .~ • · -~ ·_
regulations f()und at 50 CFR 17.21 set· · · _
forth a series of general prohibitions aiid ·' · .. -:-...
exceptions that apply fo all e_ndangered-.. _--·
Wildlife. Thes~ prol!ibit{ons, in part, __ : __
-m&ke it illegal for any person subject to
the jurisdiction of the United States to
take, import or export. ship in inte~tate ...
·commerce in the course of c·omniercial ~--·
· activity, or sell or offer for sale In . ·
Interstate or foreign commerce any: '·' ·
listed species. It also is illegal to ··.
prossess, sell, deliver, carry, transport.
Available to Conservation Measures
Conservation measures provided to
species listed as endangered or
threatened under the Endangered
Species Act include recognition,
recovery actions, requirements for
Federal protection, and prohibitions
against certain practices. Recognition
through listing encourages and results ln
conservation actions by Federal. State,
and private agencies, groups, and
individuals. The Endangered Species
Act provides for possible land
acquisition and cooperation with the
States and requires that recovery
actions be carried out for all listed
species; Such actions are initiated by the
Service following listing. The protection
required of Federal agencies and the
prohibitions against taking and harm are
discussed, in part, below.
or ship any such wildlife that has been
taken illegally. Certain exceptions.·· ·.
would apply to agents of the Service and
State conservation agencies. · ·
Permits may be issued to carry out
otherwise prohibited activities involving
endangered wildlife species under
certain circumstances: Regulations
governing permits are at 50 CFR 17.22
and 17.23. Such permits are available for
scientific purposes, to enhance the
propagation or survival of the species,
and/or for incidental take in connection
with otherwise lawful acti\•ities. In some
instances, permits may be issued during
a specified period of time to relieve
undue economic hardship that would be
suffered if such relief were not ...
available.
DRA
F
T
...
25222 Federal Register 1 Vol. 51, No. 133 ·/ Friday, July 11, 1986 / Proposed Rules
Public Comments Solicited
The Service intends that any final
action from this proposal will be as
accurate and as effective as possible.
. Therefore. any comments or suggestions
from-the public, other concerned
governmental agencies; the scientific
community, industry,_ or any other
The Endangered Species Act provides ·
for a public hearing on this proposal, if
requested. Requests must be filed within
45 days of the date of the proposal. Such
requests must be made in writing and
addressed to the Endangered Species
Field Office, 100 Otis Street, Room 224,
· Asheville, North Carolina 28801.
interested party concerning any aspect National Environmental Policy Act
of this proposal are hereby solicited. ·
Comments particularly are sought · . The-Fish and Wildlife Service has · ..
concerning: .· _ _ determined that an Environmental
(1) Biological, commercial trade, or Assessment. as defined under the .
. other relevant data concerning any.· .. _ authority of the National Environmental
threat (or lack thereof) to this species: Policy Act of1969, need no~ be prepared-
(2) The location of any additional in connection with regulations adopted ·
. po_pulations of this species and the pursuant to section 4(a) of the
Snelson, F.F. 1971. Notropis mekistocholas. a
new cyprinid fish endemic to the Cape Fear
River basin. North Carolina. Copela
197~:449-462.
Author·
The pri~ary'author of ~his-proposed
rule is Richard G. Biggins, Etidangered
Species Field Office, 100 Otis Street.
Room 224, 'Asheville, North Carolina
~01 (~~/259-0021 or FfS 672-0321~. _:
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17 · '· · _·
Endangered and threatened\vildlife;.
Fish, Marine' mammals, PlantS ·· -· . · ·· · · (agriculture)~ -· . ·. : · ·"··>:-: '1:'·.•
· _ Propos~d Regulations Promulgation.
. reasons why any habitat should or Endangered Species Act of1973, as
should not be determined to be critical amended. A notice outlining the Accoroi'ilgly, ft is hereby propo~ed to
. h~bita_t as provided by section 4 of the Service's reasons for this determination . amend Part 17, Subchapter B of Chapter
Act; ' . . . -. . was published in the Federal Register on I, Title 50 of the Code of Federal . . .
--. ·(3) Additional info~ation· ~once~·, October~· 1983 (48 ~ 49~44)· .. ·_ Regulations, as set forth below: . ; .. _ .
the range and distribution of this ..... · ;-. Refeiences· Cited· · · · · · · · !--· 1. The authority citation for Part 17-, ... -:';---i
. : species; · .• ; ·· . . · rth 1 . . fN 1 · ··. ·. continues to read as follows: ·· · •
-:. . . (4) current or planned activities in the No Caro ina Department o atura . . . . -. stlbJ' ect_atea and their,possible imp. acts Resources and Commupity DevelopmenL ·-' . . . Authority: Pub. L ~205, fr1 StaL ~: Pub. · · · · 1983. Status of Water Resourees In the . , .. L ~59, 90 StaL 911, Pub, L 95-:63Z; 92 StaL . . .. on this species: and · ·. . -.. ·. ·eapeFear_River'Basln.135 pp. . _ _ ~-_( 3751: Pub. L96-159, 93 StaL 1225; Pub. L'D?'-t-' _-:. · (5) Any foreseeable economic-and· -. Pattern; G.iJ.. andM.T. Hulsh.1985. StatUs _··:· . 304,96 8~~~.~411 (1.6 U.S.~ 1531 e_t ~-_). :_-...
· :. · .. : ::-othet: impacts result~ from the.· : · -· -siuvey of the CaP.e Fear shiner (Notl"(Jpis .... :2.'1tis_proposed to amend§ 17.1?-{h) .. ·. · · .
'I I,
'
~ I i
· .. · ~ pt:Qposed designation.of critical habitat.· mekiswcholas). us. Fish and Wildlife .. · , · by adding the following, in· alphabetical . . . Fi~al promulgation of the regulations · Semce Contract No.14-16-0009-1522..44 ; _-. order Wider' ._.FISHES," to the List of· ·• : :; :. :
:-.: .. on;this species will take into. · ·: ' .. ·: . pP. .-: .. _ . . -.. : .-:;. ;:·,~ Endangere~~n~.'Ptreat~I!eilWildlife:·. ; ··: :. ·
. ·consideration the. comments_ and any-· · .. Pattern. G.B., and M.T. Huish.1986. . . · ·. , · .. : . . .. , ·· .-. -· -·-~ .. : · -. · ··
.. · -· addi~onal i~orma~on received by the·. Supplliment to the statuS survey of the ·. ·· § 17.11 Endangered ~d_threat~ned' ··
... lSel'Vld lee, adndti~~ch cfommfi' ulnicatilontis may. . Cape Feaishlner'(Notl"(Jpis mekistoi::ho/as).' . !'lldllf!. '; .': : • . ~-·. :_• -:.\;:;. :· .. '
. · . ea o a op on o a ma regu a on U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Contract No. : .:
_that differs from this proposal. . 14-1~152:!. 11 pp. · (h) ~ ~ •: · · · ..... ·.
. • . Vertebrale
population where
. endangered 01 threatened
Status · .. When listed Oillail . 'habitat·
•• I • Special
tules
FtSHEs · .• ~ · • • ·
. Sl*ler.eape.~---.·---'"·--•. ~--No~~---~~ INC) _____ ___;· Entire----E---
--~. · 3: It ~~:rurth~r:~~posed to ~mehd ,-· ;.-· Deep River, th~n downstream in the·.
§ 17.95(e) by adding critical habitat of · Deep River (approximately'2.6) in · · -
the "Cape Fear shiner,'' in the same. Chatham and Lee Counties, to a point
alphabetical order as the species occurs · 0.3 river miles below t~e Moncure, North
. in § 17.11(h). , _ Carolina, U.S. Geologicill Survey Gaging
Station; and . · · § 17.95 CrtHc31 habitat-fish and wHdllfe.
• • * * •
Cape Fear Shiner·:
(Notropis mekistocholas)
(1) North Caroiina. Chatham County.
Approximately 4.1 rriiles of the Rocky
River from North Carolina State ·
. Highway 902 Bridge downstream to
Chatham County Road 1010 Bridge:
· (2) North Carolina. Chatham and Lee ·
Counties. Approximateiy 0.5 miles of ..
Bear Creek, from Chatham County Road
2156 Bridge downstream to the Rocky
River, th~n downstream in the Rocky
River (approximately 4.2 miles) to the
(3) North Carolina. Randolph and
Moore Counties. Approximately 1.5 . .
;0
mlles ofF~rk Creek, from a po~t o.f
creek miles upstream of Randolph
County Road 2873 Bridge downstream to
the Deep River then downstream
appoximately 4.1 miles to the Deep
River in Randolph and Moore Counties,
North Carolina, to a point 2.5 river miles
below Moore County Road 1456 Bridge.
b
1::.
f ~· r • t ~ ( • DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Register f Vol. 51, No. 133 {Friday, July 1i, 1986 / Proposed Rules 25223
Constituent elements include clean
streams with gravel, cobble, and boulder
substrates with pools, riffies, shallow
runs and slackwater areas with large ·
rock outcrops and side channels and .
pools with water of good quality with
relatively low silt loads .
• .. • • •
Dated: 'May 30, 1986.
P. Daniel Smilb;
Acting Assistant Seeretary for.Fish and. ..
Wildlife and Path.. · ·· -· -.".
(FR Doc. 86-~5643 Filed 7-1~; a:4:~ alpJ
BlUING COOE 431>-5~
; . '·
~ . :
'··-..
. ' ' . ' ~ · .....
. , . . ~ . -..
. .. :'' ; ... ·.
!.·
. •.
,.
-~ ~-. ·-· .. •' . ~ . • ;·· .. -:_;I:
. :.: ·-· •,l .
. ~ ...
.. . -;: .. .. . .,. ..... .,~· . .--.... _.
. ..... -~ ... :;•'. -
• •• ''I .. ·• !'-'•
','J _.
·.•
. . ... :'" -~·-~i~ _· .. :_
'.
i:J.'•
'•:
'.,.' ..
.. ..
'·
'';•
:_-...
-; •. ;_
·• . '
. ... _ .: ...
··.-·-: . :":~ -:-. r ...
-. ····'-. . ··.--.. -: ·.•
.. -·-··
• '·; .• . . :._> ~: . , : ---~ ·-r -:
; t :' :::.
II
. '~-.. '
·.
-··· . . .. : .•. --~ : .. '
-·.·
_.,_.,· ..
. .. ·• ::. . .:: .. . ~ •: ·: .. ':
.• :: ~-~-t\.!~·~; ,.; ~-~ .. ~.:-~­
/_:: _:~-...;~ :·; ... ~-.<t··:> ..... -..
:. . . . ;-: ' .. . . . .-~ .,
·""·'!'-:""<". . ~-::·.
-~ ':.:.;; :-.. ~~ .· .. --:· .: .. --.
·. ':-.. t.:;.:., ... ·~: --~~~: ... ~
. .; -.~·i !. ... :· ~ : .. :· .... :. . _; ~-._ .. ; ,,:_ -:·-. .;· '~:~i';.~~-·:·i·,·;:· :~-~;~~
-~·~··} :·:.-~-~-:~:!+:: :.-··-:~·· c>
· .. :~;:tt·' -:. : : .. -~-..
'. ,d ~ .. -_ :~-.. ··i ·:: ~
:-
. ~· -~· ·:i .... ·. " -~ ··.. . . . . . . ~ . -~· : : .. ~...... :: ~
:. ·:-:~··:·i.
.'•. •\
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
To: File
From: Pat DeRosa ~
Re: us 70 Drum Dump
NCD 981472624
15 June 1987
On June 10~ 1987 ~ I spoke with Dick Caspar~ Water Supply Branch~ NC
DHR, Raleigh, NC [phone] regarding surface water supply intake within 3
miles downstream of the subject site~ According to Branch records~ there are
no intakes located within 3 miles downstream of the probable point of entry of
contaminants from the site to surface water. The nearest intake is located on
the Catawba River approximately 10 miles downstream of the site~ 'Ihis intake
serves the City of Morganton water supply system.
PD/pw/0384b
Ref. 8
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TO: File
FROM: Pat DeRosa ~
RE: US 70 Drum Dump
NCD 981472624
1 Ref. 10
June 16~ 1987
On June 11; 1987; I spoke by telephone with Leslie Miller~ Agricultural
Extension Agent~ Burke County~ NC [phone]. I described the site area
and downstream surface water segment to Mr ~ Miller. Mr. Miller knew of no
wells in the area used for irrigation~ He also knew of no irrigation of food
crops from Reedy Creek to the Catawba River 3 miles downstream of the site~
PD/pw/0384b
DRA
F
T
---··----<-.. . , :·~
·~:;:
~-i --------
··--·---·r--------~----------
1-·-------
,_.I ,_. '
DRA
F
T
--------:~:--~ ' .. , --------
DRA
F
T
-., -------------
-...... -. ----·-··--· ------___ ,. ____ ----·-~----
DRA
F
T
I
,'1
,,
;: IV (!___/D 9 J' I l./7-L 0 2 y I c-c----_ ,~J.fL _71') ___ /)cwn __ b.1.1Lntf>-----____ . . _ _ ______ p~_.A/Z/JJ;j _
. . --I ____ ~_Jl1 do~ /to~c:y---J/7n.<~-:r-/'o&:c.e~:.e..LJ:l./1YJ__d~d_---c--
-· ~ _/ ' • '-"--J... -. L.I . -, _ ....... _/") ~-·---·---;~--. ___ w.-(_(h.~~-~-/-CJ.CL~/.l.A__ __ ~Q-~_C~-------------
--------~------~-~~~~~-~~~~~~~--·--------------------1 -_..... --._
I . -_!/_ ~--r:::. 3 o_ft_ct=p --m ___ t:&d.i!!'.ct:c_t_o__~-ll---em.b""' k-:>::e~-__ __ .
------....... , ___ ----~ -------------~--. --· -·-· ------~-----------------------------·----------------------------------------· ..... -------····.
DRA
F
T
i;
H '.
I'
1~------S:~~~-~-·~------Io--.lJ.O.T; .. -.. -'-·-·dd-/.rn ... ~.--~---~~ -~-___ _
·.· --------;· -~-_,-Jyn'Th-_Lj_r -';;? /1l.Ar:y&~n ....... LL .. B~tL-~-...... . I ~---~ -~-.,e.#-4_}_ '!J _ )h._ .604f>"'"'-<j~-__Ae .C-dn:£.....b-Jn-v-; .. .
~-----;;-L~·:h~_?l.JL ___ af/J.l_~---·haA:-____ A_~ ___ /J_q_,~~4~--t4---tL:,~
li ··-----·-·--------~------·-·-------------·------· -------------~------·------.
-----. :1 __ ....2_.,:A CC'e...o -/., ~~ d!J~ btz'f2,..JZ.IL~.r.s:.y.c.L
__ . ! :B.dA:f~a_cf)_ __ uJa.J.-u:-----~-;-f-J~.--L<Ja::f=Le.. __
I ______ -~; £-{)+>"> fno'o/_Q,Jof\. _ _ _ _____ _ ____ ---·---------------·--------------------------
1·-··-------: ----------· --·-------------------------------------·------·----
DRA
F
T
I
,~I
I
,,.J
.-,1
-~-V:~~-~-=--1~ ~~----~-ku---~-~~J(~JdJ.-
l r--C-U.A 0::r O,rr--.~~~_j.;_\,·~~-? ~--··-~-·-· ~--------~
~~-~~) fV--bc-i c. ~ ~~~~-? iJ ~~&!L ""? m~0 4 ~ ..
To.;\(!)r:eA ·e&..~~-j_l:/i_~_c:ro_c_l,_ -r:_..e_~_
-----.. -·-------·· ·--~·····-.·---~----·----------·----· 1----lo~~~.U>L.l~--~_l::~i::J:l.,_ar:r::_E:'Ct:\S -.7.l:z...(·~c:. _________ _
::
.I
; ~
!
1
/(~yt_ fnnr;;/ir~ oL(/ ./'?r~·~':_;;~;...;.___d_· -~-· _' -/':f:....-·~_r:.-=..-s_
~~(AH7L kYO aL«avAAm y£·; ~~S:.~--------
~ : I!
I H . ---·
;!
-·---------,-:--~--~--------~-----------·-·--------.-----------------------------··-----~·--~----··--... ~----·--'-~-----·-'·-·--·---------
d ~ : ,, J,
ll .. d ,.
------------·---------
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
To: File
From: Pat DeRosa ~
Re: us 70 Drum Dump
NCD 981472624
Ref. 12
Jtme 16~ 1987
On Jtme 15; 1987; I spoke by telephone with Robert Brown~ Fisheries
Biologist; Burke Cotmty; NC Wildlife Resources Comnission [phone]
regarding surface water usage within 3 miles downstream of the site~ I
described the stream segment from Reedy Creek to Muddy Creek to the Catawba
River~ Mr ~ Brown said that parts of this stream segment support heavy fishing
and canoeing.
PD/pw/0384b
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1··.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Basic Elements of Ground-Water Hydrology
With Reference to Conditions in North Carolina
By Ralph C. Heath
U.S. Geological Survey ·
Water-Resources Investigations
Operi-File Report 80-44
·.
·.
Prepared in cooperation with the
North· Carolina Department of Natural
Resources and Community Development
Raleigh, North Carolina
1980
_:·-···
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.·.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Hydraulic Conductivity
Unit element of aquifer
0 0 0 0
• CONFINED o
AQUIFER
0
• 0
0 0
•
0
Aquifers transmit water from recharge areas
to discharge areas and thus function as pipe­
lines. The factors controlling ground:-water
movement were first expressed in the form of
an equation by Henry Darcy In 1856. Darcy's
taw is·
where
Q = KA.Qh. (i) dl
Q is the quantity of water,·
K 'is hydraulic conductivity and
depends on the size and
arrangement of the water­
tra·nsmitting openings (pores
and fractures), '
A is cross-sectional area through
which the flow occurs, and
dh/dl is the hydraulic gradient •. !
. .
1'w.ere ·hydroul ie gradient is discussed as on independent
entity, as in the preceding discussion of t-€IC6 IN>
rntOIENrS, it is shoo.o.n s)<Tbolically as t-t_/L ~re
hydroul ic gradient. appe<~rs as one of the factors in on
equation, as in equation I, it is sllOMl s)<rilol ically as
dh/dl to be consistent with other grovnd~ter literature.
12
0 •
• ~ . e
Unit prism of
0 .
0 .
Streamlines
representing
laminar flow
Q: . . -•
aquife~
150 ft3
day
Because the quantity of water (Q} Is directly
proportional to the hydraulic gradient (dh/dl),
we know that ground-water flow Is laminar­
that is, water particles tend to follow discrete
streamlines and not mix with particles in adja­
cent streamlines.
Hydraulic conductivity is expressed in terms
of a unit hydraulic gradient (such as foot per
foot) In order to permit ready comparison of
the water-transmitting capacity of different
materials.
The units of hydraulic conductivity are those
of velocity. Thus, If we rearrangE! equation 1 for
K, we obtain
K = Qdl = (fP day"'Httr = _ft_ ( 2 )
Adh {ft2) (ft) day ·,. ...
I
I
I I
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L_
Hydraulic Conductivity of Selected Rocks
Hydraulic conductivity (rounded values)
Material (fl/day) [(gal/day)/ft>] (meters/day)
Coarse sand ...................... .
Medium sand ..................... .
Silt ............................... .
C lay .............................. .
Limestone (Ca stl e Hay ne) ... ·-.... .
Saprolite .......................... .
Gran ite and gneiss ................ .
Slate ............................. .
200
130
1
0.001
300
5
5
3
1500
1000
5
0.01
2000 so
50
25
60
40
0.2
0.0004
80
2 -
2
1
Hydraulic conductivity replaces the term "field coeffici ent of permeability" and should be used wh en
referring to the water-transmitting characteristic of material in quantitative terms. It is still permissible
to refer in qualitative terms to "permeable" and "impermeable" material.
PROBLEM -Determine the hydraulic conductivity of the confined aquifer shown in the preceding
drawing in both feet per day and gallons per day per sq~are foot.
(1) Solution in feet per day
(Equation) (Q) (A) (dl/dh)
,.---"---, ~ ~ ,.-A--,
K = Qdl = 150 fP X-1-X _1_!!... = 150 fP = 150 tt/day
Adh day fF 1 ft day fF
(2) Conversion of feet per day to gallons per day per square foot
150 fP X 7.5 gal = 1125 (gal/d)/fF
day fF fP
13
1 i
j
'
i ·I
. I
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Physical Setting of the
Ground-Water System
MOUNTAINS
.... s ... ...
0 0
0
-s Groaift Gftd ,.,; ..
E 0 " 0
From the standpoint of ground-water
hydrology, North Carolina may be divided into
two zones, one zone consisting of the Coastal
Plain and the other consisting of the Piedmont
Plateau and the Appalachi an Mountains .
Because differences in the ground-water
system coincide with the different topographic
divisions of the State, it wi ll be useful to.briefly
review these divisions.
As Jasper L. Stuckey, former North Carolina
State Geologist, has said , "The State of North
Carolina extends from the crest of the Great
Smoky and Unaka mo untains on the west, to
c
18
PIEDMONT COASTAL PLA IN
...
-50
0 0 0
-10
the Atlantic Ocean on the east and lies across
three major . topographic provinces of the
United States. As a result, it is divided into three
natural divisions-the Coastal Plain on the
east, the Piedmont Plateau in the center, and
the Appalachian Mountains on the w est.
Beginning at sea level at the eastern edge of the
State the surface of North Carolina rises
gradually in elevatio n and inc reases in
irregularity until it reaches its maximum height
and ru ggedness in the Appal achian Mountains
on the west."
I l ' I ! I I l \
r I I l
I
\
I
I
\
I I
I
I I I I
DRA
F
T
1..---
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I l_ __
Th e Coastal Plain inc lud es almost one-h alf
of th e area of the State and extends west from
the Atl an tic Ocean to th e Fall Line. The Fall
Lin e is not a line but a zone 30 to 40 miles wide
th at is marked by d iscontinuous rapids where
major strea ms leave th e bedroc k areas of the
Pied mont and flow on to the unconsolidated
sedim ents of the Coastal Plain. Altitudes in the
Coastal Plai n range from sea level at the coast
to about 300 to 500 ft. along the Fall Line. The
Coa stal Plain can conveni ently be divided into
th e Tid ewater Regio n, in which the effect of
tid es a nd oth er oceanic influences are
apparent, and the Inner Coastal Plain which,
though underlain by unconsolidated (Coastal~·
Plain) sediments, is not subject to direct~
oceanic effect.
The Pi edmont Plateau contains about
20,000 mi2, or two-fifths of the land area of the
State. It lies between the Coastal Plain on the
east and the Appalachian Mountains on the
west. Altitudes in the Piedmont range from
about 500 ft above sea level along the Fall Line
to about 1500 to 2000 ft. along its western
border. The Piedmont consists of well­
rounded hills and long-rolling ridges with a
19
,. .• , ... -....... -· ·~-.. ; .... r_ ·..:.·":"-._..
n o rth eas t-sou thwest tr end. Part s o f th e
Piedmont co ntain p rominent hills referred to as
mountains. includi ng the Uwharrie Mo untains
in Mo ntgomery and Randolph Counties. the
South M ountains in B urke and Ruth erford
Co unties, and the Bru shy Mountains in Wilkes
County.
The A ppalachian Mountains are bounded on
the east by the Blue Ridge Mountains and on
the west by th e Great Smoky and Unaka
M ountains. The mountain slopes are gentle,
prese nting s m ooth ro unded outlin es. Th e
mountain region of No rth Carolina contains
the highest pea k east of the Mississippi, Mt.
Mitchell at 6,684 ft., 43 peaks above 6,000 ft,
and 82 peaks between 5,000 and 6,000 ft. in
alti tude. The eastern Continental Divid e
follows the Blue Ridge Mountains so that most
of the mountain area drains west to the Gulf of
Mexico. The streams are well graded and
cascades and waterfalls are only locally
abundant.
Reference: Stuckey. Jasper L., 1965, North Carolina: its
geology and mineral resources: North Carolina Depart­
ment of Conservation and Development, 550 p.
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Waf:er-Bearing Rocks
The rocks underlying the surface of North
C aro lina form the environment in which
ground water occurs and moves.
Geolog ists divide all rocks exposed at the
Earth's surface into one of two great classes:
(1) igneous. or (2) sedimentary. Igneous rocks
are th ose that have formed from a molten or
partiall y-molten state. Some types of igneous
rocks. including g ranite, solid ify at great depth
be low the land surface and are referred to ·as
intrusive ig neous rocks. Other igneous rocks
form from lava or volcanic ash ejected onto the ~
surface and are referred to as extrusive ·
igneous rocks.
Sedimentary rocks are rocks form ed by the
accumulation of sediment in water or from the
air. Most sedimentary rocks are unconsolida­
ted (soil-like) at the time of formation. If they
are, in time, buried deeply enough, or if they
undergo certain chemical changes, they may
become consolidated.
Both igneous and sedimentary rocks may,
over the course of geologic time, reach depths
beneath the Earth's crust at which they are
subjected to great heat and pressure. This may
alter both their structural characteristics and
their mineral composition to such an extent
that they are changed into metamorphic rocks.
Depending on their original mod~ of origin,
they may be referred to, for example, as
metavolcanic or metasedimentary rocks.
North Carolina is underlain by an unusually
larg e number of different types of rocks,
including representatives of both the igneous
and sedimentary classes and types of both
20
classes that have been subjected to m etamor­
phism. The major types of rocks are shown on
the accompanying g eneralized geological
map.
T he Piedmo nt and mountain regi ons are
underlai n by igneous and metamorphosed
igneous and sedimentary rocks th at are
referred to co llectively as bedrock. Th ey form
broad northeast -southwest trend ing zones in
wh ich th e rocks are of similar compos ition and
origin. Most of these r-:-cks were formed in th e
Precambrian and Pale <oic Erasof the Earth's
history and thus are a~ least several hundred
million years old. The bedrock in the Pi edmont
and mountains is exposed at the surface along
steep hillsides and stream channels and in
roadcuts. In most other areas they are covered
by unconsolidated material formed from the
breakdown of the bedrock in the process refer­
red to by geologists as weathering. This layer
of weathered material is referred to as saprolite
or residuum.
The Coastal Plain reg~on is also underlain by
the same types of igneous and methamorphic
rocks as those present in the Piedmont.
However, in the Coastal Plain they are covered
by unconcolidated sedimentary deposits
which range in thickness from a few feet along
the Fall Line to about 10,000 ft. at Cape
Hatteras. (See the geologic section in
PHYSICAL SETTING OF THE GROUND­
WATER SYSTEM.) The sediments underlying
the Coastal Plain include sand, clay, beds
composed of seashells, and limestone.
\ i !
i
t ~
\ I i
I
I l '
\
t
\ I I I • I
( ! I i
I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I ! I
I I ! I
\ I I I I I
I
! I I I l I I
I I I I
\ I
\
I
I
I
\ I
I I
\
I
I '
DRA
F
T
--
361
-
>­et:
--
831
--
\ \ \
\
u•
EXPLANATION
~ -{!='o·p·j.'·:1 Surficial sands 15 :: .... :· .. and clays u
~ 0
g >-[j:~";·J Yorklown Formalion ~ ~ :··!r.::. (cloys and shell beds) ~
~ ~
15 j:··:k·J Castle Hayne Limestone o ,_ ··:.·. :··.(sandy lo dense ,_
limes lone I , z
VI => 0 "" u ;:.
"" et: u
u
~ PeeOee Formalfon S ~(sands, cloys, limeSionu)::i
~Bloc~ Creek Farmallon ~(sands, clays, and morls)
2 "" u I&J et: no
~"Tuscaloosa" Formation equi­~ valent (sands end cloys I
~ [ t·,.·:r· :,:::1 Triassic racks ~ ::. ~. ::· 1 sandstone ond conglomerates)
~
841
---
at• · ao•
• • ' r • ~Metamorphosed
~volcanic roth
Granitic Intrusives
end schist
Maslly micaceous scMst and gneiss
.,. ao•
--------r
77' 761
I '
I I '
I )41 I
•• 10 .. .. .. 100 ·~n
II •• 10 10 110 11\0ifUUI
771 761
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
.I i
i•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I!
Rock Units and Aquifers
in i:he Piedmont and Mountains
C ( 0 lit C I A
HYDJlOCWLOCIC UN 1 TS
[[] ~~C~~:~~~BELT
~ ~k~Is~~~tl~·xn Ptrn~"'' BPl.T
EiZ1 2WtW-ar6frh
§ ~ijlsiltWc~ BD.T
P"JJ IC-E U:SIC(Su~u:nit:) till AAGILLITE(Subunlt)
tTh1 hlli~i§ MSINS
Tne rocks underlying the Piedmont and
mountains can be divided into two groups:
(1) bedrock, and (2} saprolite (or residuum).
The saprolite underlies the land surface and
ranges in thickness from a foot or two near
bedrock outcrops to more than 100ft. Bedrock
underlies the saprolite and is the parent rock
from which the saprolite was derived in the
process referred to as weathering.
Many stream valleys, especially those of
larger streams, are underlain by a layer of
·material similar in composition to saprolite.
This material. which has been deposited by the
strea ms during floods, is correctly referred to
as alluvium. However. to avoid unnecessa ry
complications. v.:e will lump the alluvium in
with the saprolite for th e purpose of this
disc ussion.
The bedrock underlyin g the Piedmont and
moun tains consists of many d iffe.rent types of
igneous and metamorp hosed ig neo us and
sed imentary rocks. The Generali zed Geo log i­
cal t!tap of No rth Ca ro lina accompa ny ing the
discussion of WATER-BEAR IN G ROCKS
d ivides the bedrock in the Piedmont and
US 70 DRUM DUMP
NC D981472624
26
c
0
..
mountains into six units. The 1:500,000 scale
Geologic Map of North Carolina, published in
1958, divides the bedrock in the same area into
48 different units. But, a much larger number of
units have beeri identified and are shown on
large scale geologic maps.
The bedrock units differ from each other in
mineral composition and other geologic
characteristics. Fortunately, these differences
do not result in large differences in hydraulic
characteristics so that it is possible to co mbine
the bedrock units into a relatively small number
of hydrogeologic units.
Th e accomp anying map shows the hydro­
geologic units into whi ch the bedrock in the
Piedmont and mountains has bee n divided by
the U.S. Geo logical Su rvey and the North
Ca rolin a Gro un dwater Section.
Th e mos t produc tive hydrogeologic unit s
are the Great Smoky Mountain beit and the
Blue Ridge-Inner Piedmont bel t. The least
productive units are the Carol ina Slate Belt and
the Triassic Basins. The Charlotte Belt is
intermediate in produc tivity.
\
t t !
l
t
\
\
!
i
I
\ I i !
i I
I
I
\ i
I
I
\ _ _j
DRA
F
T
---
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
'I
I :• I
I
I
I
I
!I
I•
i I
II
I
I
L
Ground-Water Situation
in the Piedmont and Mountains
The saprolite (weathered rock) that forms
the land surface in the Piedmont and
mountains consists of unconsolidated granu­
lar material. It thus contains water in the pore
~paces between rock particles.
The bedrock, on the other hand, does not
have any significant intergranular .(primary)
porosity. It contains water, instead, in ·sheet­
like openings formed along fractures (that is,
breaks in the otherwise "solid" rock). Fractures
in bedrock are of two types: (1) joints, which
are breaks along which there has been no
differential move ment; and (2) faults, which are
breaks along which the adjacent rocks have
undergone differential movement.
Faults are form ed during earthquakes and
generally contain larger and ·more extensive
openin gs than th ose developed along joints.
Joi nts, howeve r, are far more numerous than
faults.
Fractures (j oints and fa ults) are more
abundant under valleys, draws, and other
surface depressions than u nder hills .. In fact,
27
geologists assume that it is the presence of
fractures that determined the position of
valleys in the first place. Fractures tend to be
more closely-spaced and the openings
developed along them tend to be larger near
the surface of the bedrock. Most fractures
appear to be non water-bearing below a depth
of 300 to 400ft. Large water-bearing openings,
penetrated below this depth are probably
associated with faults.
The ground-water system in the Piedmont
and mountains is recharged by precipitation
on the interstream areas. A part of the
precipitation infiltrates through the unsatu-
. rated zone to the water table, which normally
occurs in the saprolite.
G round water moves laterally and downward
through the saprolite to points of ground­
water seepage (springs) on the hillsides and to
the streams in th e adjacent valleys. Some of the
water in the saprolite also moves downward
into the bed rock and , thereafter, through the
fractures to the adjacent vall eys.
I
I
I I
I I
I
I i DRA
F
T
-----·-·-~---------
Hydrau lic C haracte ristics of the
Pie d mo nt and Mountain
Ground-VVater System
,---STORAGE
IN
BED ROCK
BEDROCK
One of the most basic concepts of ground­
water hydrology is that aquifers function both
as reservoirs, in which water is in storage, and
as pipelines, which transmit water from one
point to another. This is referred to as the
reservoir-pipeline concept This concept forms
a useful basis on which to discuss the hydraulic
characteristics of the Piedmont and mountain
gro und-water system.
The reservoir (storage) function of aquifers
depends on the porosity. The pipeline function
depends o n t he hydraulic conductivity and the
thickness of th e ·aq uifer. The approximate
range in po rosity and hydraulic conductivity
for the saprolite and bedrock is shown in the
followi ng tab le.
28
Rock type
Saprolite
Bedrock
VIELL---Lj
Porosity in percent
20-30
0.1-1
Hydraulic
conductivity In
feet per day
1-20
1-20
The above values suggest that the principal
difference between saprolite and bedrock is in
water-storage capacity. In other words, th e
saprolite h as the capacity to store a much
larger quantity of water than does the b edrock.
Th is is not the entire story, howeve r.
As we noted above, the capacity of an aq uifer
to transmit w ater depends both on hydraulic
conductivity and on aquifer t hickness. The part
o f the b e d rock co nt ainin g water-bearing
fractures is several times thicker than th e
saprolite.
\
I
I
l
_j
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
il
I
I
I
I
We can then, wi thout great error, view th e
ground -water system in the Piedmont and
mountains as consis ting of a sapro lite rese r­
voir overlyi ng a bedrock p ipel ine consisting of
numerous small, in terconnected pipes. In the
vicini ty of a pumping we ll the bedrock
fractures ("pipes") convey water from the
sapro lite reservoir to the well.
Th e yield of a well drawing from fractured
bedrock depends o n several factors. The most
important of these are believed to be:
1. The number, size, area l extent, and
degree of interconnection of the fractures ··
penetrated by the w ell, -
2. The thickness of saturated saprolite in the
vicinity of the well and the specific yield of
the saprolite, and
29
3. The hydraulic conductivity o f the sapro­
lite and the natu re of the hydraulic c on­
necti on betwe en th e sapro lite and the
bedrock.
The number and the size o f th e fractures
control t he rate at wh ich wate r ca n enter th e
well. T he area l ex tent and degree of intercon­
nection of the fractures control the size of th e
area that supplies water to the well.
Th e thickness and th e specific yi eld of th e
saprolite determines the vol ume of water
available from storage in the saprolite. Th e
hydraulic conductivity of th e sap roli te and th e
nature of the hydraulic connection between
the saprolite and the bedrock determine s the
rate at · which water c an drain from the
saprolite into the bedrock fractures.
J
DRA
F
T
r --
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Selecting Weil Sites in the
Piedmont and Mountains
/
X /
/
Ro ck
5 Number related to topographic position
® Number related to saprolite
Most ground-water supplies in the Piedmont
and mountains are obtained from wells that are
cased through the saprolite and finished with
open holes in the bedrock. The yield of these
wells depends on the number and size of the
fractures they penetrate. Therefore, where
mo"derate to large supplies of water are
needed. well sites should be selected at the
places where fractures appear to be most
abundant. ··
· H. E. LeGrand, of the U.S. Geological
30
thickness
Survey, attempted in 1967 to indicate the
relative favorability of well sites in the
Piedmont and mountains by assigning point
values to areas on the basis of saprolite thick­
ness and topographic position. The point
values assigned by LeGrand to features of the
land surface that suggest thickness of saprolite
and to different topographic positions are
shown below. Selected values of each are also
indicated on the above sketch.
' i
I t i
l
f I i t I
\ t
l
I
l
I
I
l I
-' _j
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-.. -.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Features of land surface
related to saprolite thickness
· Bare rock-almost no soil
Some rock outcrops-very thin soil
A few rock outcrops-thin soil
No fresh outcrops-moderalely
thick soil
No rock outcrops-thick soil
Point
value
0-2
2-6
6-9
9-12
12-15
The point values for saprolite thickness and
topographic position are added and the total is
used in conjunction with the following table to
estimate the chance of obtaining different
Total points Average
Topographic position
Steep ridge top
Upland steep slope
Rounded up_land
Midpoint of ridge slope
Gentle upland slope
· Broad flat upland
lower part of upland slope
Valley bottom of flood plain
Draw with small catchment
Draw with large catchment
Point
value
0
2
4
5
7
8
9
12
15
18
yields. (The following ·table is an abbreviated
and slightly modified version of the table
prepared by LeGrand.)
assigned to yield Chance of success; In percent. for a well to yield at least-
a site (gal/min) ~gal/min ]D_gal/mln
5 3 50
10 6 65
15 15 80
. 20 25 90
"25 40 93
30 ·so 96
Most of the wells used in LeGrand's analysis
were drilled to obtain water for domestic needs
at the sites most convenient to the well owners.
Thus, no special attempt was made to select
the most favorable sites. We know that the
chances of success can be greatly improved if
· wells are not only located in valleys but also at
places where the topography suggests the
·.
20
40
55
70
80
90
31
25 gal/min 50 gal/min 75 gallmln
5 3
15 15
30 15
50 25 20
65 45 35
75 55 45
presence of intersecting fractures. In fact,
recent studies suggest that where best tech­
nology is applied in the selection of well sites,
ali average yield of 150 gal/min can be
expected.·
Reference: LeGrand. H. E •• 1967. Ground water of the
Piedmont and Blue Ridge Provinces in the Southeastern
States: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 538. ·
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
To: File
From: Pat DeRosa ~
Re: US 70 Drum Dump
NCD 981472624
June 18, 1987
On June 17, 1987, I spoke by telephone with Mario Deluca, Associate
Agricultural Extension Agent, McDowell County, [phone], regarding usage
of groundwater for irrigation of food crops in McDowell County. Mr. Deluca
said he knows of no irrigation wells in the county.
PD/pw/0384b
1. Ref. 14
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TO:
FROM:
RE:
File
Pat DeRosa ~
US 70 Drum Dump
NC D981472624
Ref. 15
1 July 1987
On June 22, 1987, I spoke by telephone with Carol Walsh, OSC, EPA
Region IV, Emergency and Remedial Response Branch, Atlanta, GA [phone],
regarding the removal action at the subject site. She recounted the following
sequence of events: EPA emergency response personnel moved up to the site on
March 9, 1987 and began staging and temporary storage of the drums.
Fifty-five 55-gallon drums of solid material and four 55-gallon drums of
liquids were found at the site. No form of containment was observed.
Composite waste and soil samples were collected on March 13-14, 1987. Drums
were moved to the Burke County Landfill on Kirksey Road on March 16-17, 1987.
On receipt of the sampling results, drums were overpacked on April 14-15, 1987
and shipped off-site for disposal.
PD/tb/0384b
DRA
F
T
ana t:OVIfOfllllt:ll&al .~v•••• -· -. .__ ------
I
I
. ··-· -· .
Em«gency & .~ . (8031734-5424.! =:-.t .' . '. ,'
'•· .-;.. ~ ' .
•' •. ·_: '9p.~· 1 ..,. '•I •, "
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~----------~~~-r.~~~~~~O~M~S~~~~ Ref . 16 ~-.
Information In the allaaea .,.... 1a not
required by Federal law, but Ia by Stat. law.
7. T~ 2 Company Name
9. Cesignated FaciU:y Name and Sit. Address ~~I?/YI1AL c;(,vA II (111 L~xl'
t?~I L.Il._UI'-t) )r__
1181-1 ~
/.;_ A-1 >I Jr' P,t _¢ t..J!. j_ ; t~ ).. I V I j./ g ~ / £/Vt< Yh -'i1~:
L-I (). "'' •> t1 N I Cf q .J ( r:. ?_!...) ....:.j:;-~.~:2,:2;.-__i.~-----+...L..L.+-L!_L-...L. ... L.L-t---t.~~~~rl
d.
'. ~ o-:r--~lo£ ~...~~At-..1\t:
. ~-~~?~· . ~"~~~iir~to!(;;T~ cr i'S1::y(--'-,'3 is ;:iJ
1-1 I I I I I
15. Special Handling lnstructior:s and Addi tiona! lr.fcrrr ..;lion ~
/),t...t..-jJAJ.TfE.C.I~ ;t7c'~ ?3)!..,/j (, )/..,
\.0 0 ~ 4>~'1 \
5. QEJjERA TOR"S CERTlFICAnON: I ~eby Glodar•lt".at ~ =r.t.,-,taof!tlls~n~ arwfvlly and aec\lra-'Yde-.clibod 3boW by pcopet ahiPQin<;l name and ant dasa.ifted.
pacl<.ed. mat1t•"1. and 1.3beled. and are In &ll reap6cta !n p<cr;et condition roc transport by highway ..::c:onslf>'l kJ appllcat:le !ntamatlonaJ and national !]........,menl nt~~ulallona and
tt>e laws of ::.. Sta'-of Sault\ C.Voiii\L
If I am a large quantity generator. I c .ortily ltlat 1 haw a .><OIIr&m Ill 0-'aee to reduce lt\6 YOiume c.nd toa.lclty of~ genera:.d to ~ d~r•l n.r.-i!.n.nnlned t.-, be ec:onomk:ally
PBC~i~•-a-... ;,_.._. selec1ed l • ~ iT><r.T'Od of tr-~ a~~:>rage. « dlspoul CUtTWIIIy avail.l.ble to me whlcn mlnlml:tn 1t1e pr-nlllld fvtunl ttlrM'IO llwnan
'"-l1n llld the ......VOt'••nent:OR.III am all<l'\all Guat:Ufy ~00'.1 have made• good 1ai1tt eflortkJ ~my ....... ~Uon and Mlect 1t\e-wu&e ~-1..-.od
h:.l Ia ....a&ble :o me and !hat I can &~toni.
-~~~~==~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I
'• I
I
.I
~~~ ~~~~A~F~~--~8~7~oo-~~~l~0---.~9~/86~)~?~ra-v~t·o_u_c~~----~~--~~~~~--~--~~------------·----------------------~~-L~-l-J~ .J <er ~... .._. .----.. ~ :10r.3 are Cc sol ~~ [DHEC 1~-0 (Fi<N. 10/86))
I
---------
I
I
_____ _j
r I
t I
il !I I 1
DRA
F
T
------··-----~....,~ ........ -.......... _ --..-----------·-·---~----------------~
and Environmental Control
f
11~:-------------~~~~H--
-~~" -""""'-"-~"""' !c< """T""'"""' A.."cn ' ! ? .. . -_~;'-._... . -·. . .
I! i ! ; li:r:~l-1 o ~'J~'{~-3"d=i-= 1L.J ,·-·cc;·~--,1 .
I I' : I i l~=L.' I I .' 1_:-1 I_. I !_. ~:-_,· -:.L_U-1 I
j I '5 .-. J H .,. 1 . d . . -• I I .
1 • . ,pec:a anc.;n.;~ r.str.Jc'.lons ar<: A c•ton;;. r: cr.na~on 1· 13u_t-;)A 2 / ~C.;-/ ? t ~ '6) {.I ;53{, ) ~
•.• @ I
I
I
~{aq\\
6.. GE>4ER..ATOR"S CERilF\CA.TlOH: I h.erebyoK:i.ar~ &tat l!,e ::cnte.r~~ o1' tr.is ccns;gnmem..,.... tully and accurae.ly descr:~ aocv~ t-.:y propet" a.h!ppinQ name and are da.s.a.ified..
packed. n .N'i<ed, and labeled. and are In all r~;><>ct!l in p:-o~ c=di,;oo ~r tran300rt by hl~;~hway accord in<;~ to applicat-ie interr.a~cnal and nat!G<Ial govemr,.nt reQula!lons and
lt\e Ia'*"' of tt-. State of So\.11'1 C..: oil""-
If I am alarQe quantity ~to<'. I e&rtity that I have a o~rvn In ;:l.aca to reduce the 'VOl urn<~ and toJUC!ty of,....,. genent<Od to C"te de<;lr-I tu.v.o detlt<TT\lne<lto be economlcaJty
Pf'aCticable and that I haV"> :selected the pra~ :ka~e """"od of trealn'en+, !'"""Qe. cr dbposal curre<~!!y IIVLiable to m<1 whlcn m1nimi z.,s tfle pceaent and 1\rtuno !tlr-1 to human
h.e:a.l1t1.ar.d the eovtronme:Tt-()A. tt1 a..i1 a sm.e:J Qu&.rH.:ty ·;e . ..:rat.Of". i "•v• ma.:"o't a gv--....1 faith ef'fort to mlntmlze my Wa,j.JII ~•lkn s.nd s.eiec!'ttte ~t ·.va..a::te tT\all.Ag-em.ent moe1:hod
'lh&r Ia available ~ me af\d !na• I CN'I alford.
I I ,, ~ 4 i9!bs. c:( ._ ..........._.._._.__.1~
b I I I I I I jibs. d I lk
DRA
F
T
. \' :
--0
GEOLOGY AND ·GROUND-WATER RESOURCES
..
. -
of the
MORGANTON
RALEIGH
~ARCH.
1967
AREA
. ~ ....
. · .... -
CERCLA
-·
, .. . : ...
. •-··.:.
DRA
F
T
I.
I I cEOLOGY AND GRO~JND-\VATER RESOURCES
· of··· the· . · ·.·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
.
lVIORGANTON AREA
NORTH CAROLINA
... !.f ... ·, ·, .. ~
By
Carlton T. Sumsion
Geologist, U. S. Geological Survey
Chemical Qu~l'lity of Water Section
:···
By
R. L. Laney·
Chemist, U.S. Geological Survey · .. l_.
GROUND WATER BULLETIN NUMBER 12
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
George E. Pickett, Director
Division of Ground Water
Harry M. Peek, Chie(
....
PREPARED COOPERATIVELY BY THE GEOLOGICAL S0RVEY
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
AND THE
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
MARCH 1967
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
-------
--~--~----------·~ •-. ~ ----------
GEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF THE
MORGANTON AREA , NORTH CAROLINA
By
ABSTRACT
Th e Morganton area, located i n t he west-c e ntral part of North
Carolina , comprises Avery, Burke , Caldwell , McDowell , Mitchell, Watauga,
and Yancey Counties. The area includes 2,522 square miles apportioned
between t he Blue Ridge and inner Piedmont physiographic provinces. From
southeast to northwest, the topographic relief of gentle hills and broad
valley s of t he inner Piedmont gives way to the steep eastern front of
the Blue Ridge, beyond which more subdued slopes 'toward the west prevail.
Streams and drainage courses are of geologically subsequent development
on fracture systems which have clearly defined patterns throughout most
of t he area.
Metamorphic and igneous rocks underlying the area range in compo­
sition from quartzite to gabbro. Gneissic, schistose, pyroclastic, and
quartzi t ic rocks are the most prominent lithologic types. Structur al
trends in t he area are varied , but generally are oriented north to
northeast.
Ground water is obtained from weathered rock or saprolite and
alluv ium by dug and bored wells. Drilled wells derive ground water
from joint and shear openings in unweathered bedrock. Wells drilled
in low, flat areas and narrow, linear valleys hav e greater yields than
wells drilled on high ground or slopes. The pre sent rate of ground­
wate r withdrawal has only local effe c t on the hei ght of the water
t abl e . The amoun t of ground wa t e r c ontaine d i n b e drock decreases wi th
de pt h , he nc e drilling wells d e eper th a n abo ut 300 fe et u s ually wi l l
not subs t anti a lly incr e ase wel l yields . .·
One-hundred and ten wate r analyses are use d t o dete rmine t he
chemic a l quality of the ground water in the Horganton a rea. Gene r ally,
ground water is slightly acid, c ontains l ess than 150 ppm dissolved
s olids, i s soft (less than 50 ppm ha rdne ss a s Ca c o3), and contains less
I
DRA
F
T
I·.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I .c
:~
~-.)_ :·<
2
than 0.3 ppm iron. Due to differences in duration of water-rock contact,
dissolved solids are highest in water from drilled wells and dug wells
and least in water from springs. Based on concentrations of chloride
and nitrate'· dug wells are considerably more susceptible to contamina­
tion than springs or drilled wells in the Morganton area.
Chemical analyses of ground water in the Morganton area can be
divided into five types by use of pattern diagrams. Ground-water types
can be mapped but are shown to extend across and change within boundaries
-~ . ~ of rock units.
I ·a
DRA
F
T
----------·~'V --·-- ---
N US 7 0 DRUM DUMP
NC D981472624
a. Halifax area, Bulletin 51
b. Greensboro area, Bulletin 55
c. Charlotte area, Bulletin 63
d. States vi II e are a, 8 u II e tin 6 8
e. G r e e n vi II e are a, 8 u II e tin 7 3
f. Wilmington area, Ground-Water Bulletin I
g. Goldsboro ~.rea , Ground-Water Bulletin 2
h. Fayetteville area, Ground-Water Bulletin 3
i. Swanquarter area, Ground-Water Bulletin 4
j. Monroe area, Ground-Water Bulletin 5
k. Southport area, Ground-Water Bulletin 6
I. Northwestern N.C. area, report in preparation
m. Raleigh area, report in preparation
n. Durham area, report in preparation
o. Elizabeth City area, report in preparation
~~~Thl?®t~rJ~::Lti~!f!.J)i{9J!!J..6J.u:~J?o.nJ
q. Asheville area, report in preparation
r. Waynesville area, report in preparation
s. Murphy area, report in preparation
Figure 1. Index map of North Carolina showing area of investigat ion by counties and
physiographic divisions.
- --,
DRA
F
T
-----~
I
I
I
I
II
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
-• I I ~
-j
I l I
f.
I ... y L>-•
9
GEOLOGY
Introduction
··The Morganton area is underlain by a complex assemblage of meta­
morphic rock types. These rocks were mapped on a reconnaissance basis
during this investigation. In order to fae:ilitate map rt-presentation
of rock types for their relation to quantity and quality of ground water,
rock classification in this report is based on composition and physical
identification rather than stratigraphic r~lationships. Stratigraphy
l in the Mo.J:ganton area is complex and, in plac es , obscure due to re-
current regional metamorphism. Boundary transitions between rock types
may be defined within a few inches or feet 9 or they may be represented
by wide .zone.s in which the rock types are intermixed and interlayered,
showing only a progressive change in dominant rock type. Generally the
change in type is gradational and the contact between types is indeter­
minate. Hence, rock-type boundaries should be considered approximate
on the geologic map (pl. 2).
The succession of ge.ologic events w-hich brought about the exist­
ing complex of lithologies within the inner Pie dmont and Blue Ridge pro­
vinces is not yet clearly understood. Heterogeneity of rock types
associated with compositional layering indicates c:. ·__.·iverse sedimentary
and igneous origin in an environment of rapid deposition. Relict sedi­
mentary structures, current bedding and graded bedding, are present in
some compositional layers. Mter the ·deposition of these intermixed
sedimentary and igneous rocks, they underwent recurrent regional meta­
morphism by compression which has tranaformed them by heat and directed
pressure :into a folded complex of gneisses and schists. Many of the
pegmatite dikes or veins within the metamorphic complex are probably
by-products of this metamorphic heat and pres sure. Basic igneous
stocks and dikes of gabbro and diaba~e intruded ~he metamorphic-rock
complex later, mainly within t he Blue Ridge part of the Morgant on area.
The elevation and ensuing erosion of th ~ rock c omp le x for -~ very long
t ime is evident from .the beveled appearance of "the inntr Piedmont and
the dissected aspect of the Blue R1dge province. Throughout the inner
Piedmont and in many places w-ithin the Blue Ridg provinee deep we at her­
ing of .bedrock has pLoduced a thick hesidual mantle. Mechanical weather­
ing, t hough effective in expos 1ng bedrock in areas of greater reli ef, is
! .,
·l
i
il
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -'~
"''
/0 ·· ..
10
less effective than the action of chemical weathering in most of the
area."
Areal Distribution and Character of Rocks
Pegmatite
Veins or ~ikes of this rock type are irregular, light-colored,
coarsely crystalline quartz, feldspar, and mica. In the red-brown
saprolite mantle pegmatites appear as contrasting light-gray to White
masses of clay. Pegmatite veins or dikes are formed by the solidifica­
tion of highly mineralized, volatile solutions which originated at
high temperatures and pressures. Although they are commonly considered
to _be by-products of igneous intrusion, their temperatures and pressures
of origin are not inconsistent with those likely undergone by the host
rocks during regional metamorphism. Crystals in.pegmatites are of
mineralogic interest because they are usually large and well formed.
These veins or dikes are common in most of the metamorphic rock types
of the Morganton area. They' range in thickness from a few inches to
many feet and may be traced for greater linear distances, but they are
not-large enough to define on the g~~logic map.
Bakersville Gabbro and diabase dikes
Gabbro is a dark gray, greenish, or black rock, finely crystal­
line. The rock is said to have a diabasic texture when its fine laths
of plagioclase are enclosed in augite. Gabbro and diabase rocks weather
to a dark-red earth, and weathered bedrock exposures show characteris­
tically rounded exfoliation surfaces. West of Bakersville in the
vicinity of Red Hill, Mitchell County, a small gabbro stock has in­
truded metamorphic rocks ~est of Elk Park in Avery County. In these
same areas numerous small diabase dikes, apparently related to the
intrusive stocks, strike northwestward, roughly parallel to structural
trends of amphibolite gneiss and layered gneiss which the dikes intrude.
These dikes are not large enough to define on the geologic ~ap. A dia­
base dike unrelated to the gabbro stocks is shown on the geologic map
in Burke and Caldwell Counties because of its great length and apparent
continuity. It strikes about N. 35° W., roughly normal to regional
structural trends. The width of this dike, where it can be seen in
outcrops, ranges from less than 10 feet to nearly 30 feet (fig. 4).
DRA
F
T
I
!----- - -- - --
Plate 2-
Geologic mop of the Morganton area.
North Carolina. showing major rock lype ·
•• : ,!' ~·
·• t v I 0 ~ O
---
"""'"
CL[V[LANO
C 0 UN T Y
US 7 0 DRUM DUMP
NC 0981472624
- -
'< ..
" 0 G ... ~
COUNTY
- ---
[liPLANA T\ON
=·l o..e... .. dlkt
[ .. ] ............
~J
G o.-1·-~-
B Sol~t--c.f
GJ ""o..,hc: •-"
B o.-u-tooo•hlt
B Gor...,•....CO 1C;
B Lo.,..,.o~·
B """"""'~ .....
El ~"Q-R1
8 &«. .... -(
El w~oe .--
B ~~~~OO'Wlr'
B ~...ell,.,.
~ B 0 $chtt.,_ ....
El -w B 0 --z
1---·-·
l
---~----..... -----------
--.....
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
13
Gran:.t ic gneiss
Outcrops of this heterogeneous complex are generally granite
gneiss. Intermixed and interlayered with the granite gneiss are
biotite-muscovite echist , amphibolite gneiss and schist, compositionally
layered gneiss, micaceous quartzite, dolomitic gneiss, and quartz-biotite­
monzonite gneiss. Boundary transitions of this complex rock type are
generally wide zones which show only a progressive change in dominant
components. The grarutic gneiss complex weathers to a reddish-clay
residuum. This comp~ex extends from southeastern McDowell County north­
eastward through central Burk~ and Caldwell Counties.
Quartz -biotit~ gneiss
This mica gneiss complex consiets predominately of quartz-biotite
gneiss and schist~ compositionally layered gneiss, schistose quartzite,
dolomitic gneiss, quartz-monzonite gneiss, and micaceous crystalline
limestone. Its boundary transitions are rarely well defined. The mica
gneiss complex weathers to . reddish-clay saprolite which contains
schistose layers of light-bro~~ decayed mi~a. As shown on the geologic
map, quartz-biotite gneiss is the most extensive rock type in the Morgan­
ton area.
Garnet-mica schist
This schist is varied in color from green, to gray, and rust.
Dark-gray graphitic layers are net uncommon in this unit. Contacts of
this rock are sharply defined where they are exposed. The garnet-mica
schist weathers to a reddish clay in whi~h much of the original schis­
tosity is preserved. Several Plongate units of this garnetiferous,
quartz-muscovite schist. extend northt-ast'.vard from western McDowell
County into southern Yancey County, .-\compositionally similar unit
occurs in eastern Caldwell Cow1ty .
Lay ered gne1ss
As with other metamorphic-rock complexes in the Morganton area,
the layered-gneiss complex has a wholl y heterogeneous aspect (figs.
6 and 7). It is distinguishP.d by primary c ompositional layering. In
outcrops tens of feet wide it is gpnerally gray, feldspathic, quartzose
rock with sharply defined compo;;i til•nal layers which have continuity and
DRA
F
T
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L
19
schistose quartzites; light-colored 9 schistose, pyroclastic rocks; mica
schist-; layered gneiss; mica gneiss ; dark-gray phyllite; graphitic
schist; light-gray quartzite; dolomitic, quartzitic rocks; and light­
colore-d, fe l dspathic quartzite. T'ney "'eather to varied shades of red,
sandy clay •. Designated as schistose, quartzitic rocks on the geologic
map , t hey extend northeastward from McDowell County through Burke ?
Caldwell , and Watauga Counties.
Dol omite and limestone
Where it is exposed in quarries, bedding in the light-gray, dense,
crystalline dolomite is massive 9 with only l ocal thin beds and dark-gray,
argillaceous partings. Linville Caverns , north of Ashford in McDowell
County, is a network of s~lution channels developed on joint systems
-within the dolomite. Near Woodlawn9 McDowell County, the dolomite is
quarried for road metal. A small outcrop of light -gray and white dolo­
mite, too small to define on the geologic map, is exposed in a railroad
cut about It miles northwest of Bandanna in Mitchell County. Dark-blue
and dark-gray, foliated, micaceous , crystalline limestone outcrops, too
small to define on the geologic map , occur north and west of Marion in
McDowell County (fig. 10). These small limestone outcrops appear to be
aligned on a trend of approximately N. 55° E., consistent with regional
structural trends.
Quartzite
·The light-tan and white , massive-and cross-bedded, fine-grained
quartzite local l y contains dark-gray and dark~green, graphitic, argil­
laceous partings (fig. 11). It weathers to a light-colored, sandy
earth, in some places resembling unmetamorphosed, friable sandstone.
The quartzite is exposed in a large , di3sec t ed anticline near the cen­
tral part of the Morganton are a . A simi l a r quartz ite , c oarse -grained,
containing v aried amounts cf fe l dspat hic cons ti t ueats , light-colored
pyroclastic layers, with dark-gray and black ergilla ceous interbeds,
occurs in northern Mitchell , \vatauga , a:;:-,d Yancey Countie s .. ·
Saprdi te
Mechanical and chemical weathe ring of roc ks in the Horgant on area
has formed an extensive residual man tJ.e .:f soils and saprolite. Sapro­
li--te , or decomposed rock, i n this area deve.lop.e a be_st oo gne--issic and
I ;
II ·d
·f
Jl
! 'I q!
[ L I
. I ~
' • t
I i
I
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
22 .,
schis~ose rocks containing feldspar or amphibolite minerals as these are
very unstable in the presence of air and moisture. As weathering pro­
gresses, soluble products of weathering (and some colloids) are con­
tinually removed by ground-1·iater circulation. The residuum of clay
minerals, oxides of iron and aluminum, quartz, and other insoluble
ac.ce·ssory minerals, with partly weathered rock constituents, compose
saprolite . Where the mantle is more deeply developed and least affected
by erosion, it may comprise a zone of soils, an intensely weathered
zone -of saprolite 9 and a transitional zone between saprolite and un­
WBathered rock. Relict schistosity or foliation and partly weathered
laminae of mica are_ common ·where the antle has been untlisturbed. The
thickness of the mantle in the Morganton area ranges from less than 1
foot U> over -100 feet. The saprolite mantle is deepest and best
developed over low areas of the inner Piedmont and in areas of subdued
relief in parts of the Blue Ridge upland.
Alluvial sediments
Much of the surface material throughout the Morganton area has
been transported varied distances by alluvial processes. In the larger
stream valleys coarsely stratified ·sediments of siz~~ ranging from clay
to small boulders form alluvial deposits up to 50 feet thick. Auger-hole
transections to test for thickness and character of sediments and for
·ground-water · occurrence in the Catawba and Yadkin River valleys penetrated
varied thicknesses of alluvium consisting of high percentages of clay.
Rapid weathering processes may be partly responsible for the large amounts
of clay in stream-valley sediments. Terrace deposits of coarse gravel and
boulders are present along most of the larger perennial streams.
,•
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -
I
I
I
~--
I
I
I
I 2'" . ..
42
GROUND·WATER HYDROLOGY
The Hydrologic Cycle
The constant circulation of water vapor and water between the earth
and the atmosphere is called the hydrologic cycle. Heat from the sun
causes .water from the oceans and the rivers, lakes, and soil of the land
to evaporate into the atmosphere. The oceans cover about three-fourths
of the earth's surface, but nearly 5t times as much water is evaporated
from the oceans as from the land surfaces. The amount of water vapor the
atmospnere is able to hold depends on its temperature; as its temperature . .
increases the atmosphere can retain more moisture. Relative humidity is
the :amount of water vapor in the air compared with the maximum amount of
water v~por that the air could hold at a giv~n temperature. When moisture
in th~ atmosphere attains a relative humidity of 100 percent, the satura­
tion point, either by cooling or acquisition of water vapor, conditions
are-favorable for precipitation that may fall as rain, sleet, hail, or
snuw4 Dew is an important source of moisture for plants in arid regions.
I Water--from precipitation on the land surfaces may run off into lakes and
streams and return to the oceans, or some may infiltrate the soil and
percolate downward to the zone of saturation from whence it may move lat­
e·rally·.to reappear at lower surfaces as···seeps and springs or streams, or
prec-ipitation may evaporate after falling on the earth and return direct­
ly to·;·the atmosphere {fig. 15). This transfer of moisture between the
earth and the atmosphere through many complex and divergent routes is
unending.
The water table
Subsurface water is that which has infiltrated the earth's surface
or the soil layer. It may b~ used and transpired by plants, it may be
evaporated directly from the soil, or it may percolate downward to the
zone of saturation where it becomes part of the ground-water reservoir.
Subsurface water in the unsaturated zone, known as the zone of aeration,
occurs in three layers: the soil layer, an intermediate layer, and a
lower layer or capillary fringe which lies directly over the z~ne of
satUration or ground-water reservoir {fig. 15). When sufficient water
has infiltrated the soil layer to overcot;te the molecular attraction of
soil part'icles, it will begin to percolate downward through the
DRA
F
T
i
1-
/1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l_
44
rrrtermedTate layer by the pull of gravity. The capillary fringe consists
of water held above the zone of saturation by capillary attraction; in
fine s±lts or clayey earth it may rise several feet and in coarse gravel
it may ri~e less than an inch. The upper surface of the zone of satura­
tion· ·is known as the water table. The zone of saturation is the vast
system of ground-water reservoirs in permeable rock that provide water
to seeps , springs, and effluent streams 9 and to wells. Configuration
o·f the water table is generally a subdued reflection of topographic re­
lief, although it may be-discontinuous between joint and shear systems
-in bedrock. The bottom of the zone of saturation is obscure; it may be
defined conditionally as the greatest depth at which ground-water circula­
tion occurs in joint and shear systems.
Occurrence of ground water
·Ground water in the Morganton area occurs in the deeply weathered
r·e-si-dnal mant le or saprolite and in joints or shear openings in bedrock.
Trend of ground-water movement in saprolite or bedrock openings is more
or less directly from higher interfluvial places in topography, and the
water table, to lower areas, generally to effluent perennial streams.
Rate of ground-water movement is dependent on hydraulic gradient and
p~~ability of the water-saturated zone. Where relict schistosity is
present in saprolite, it influences the movement of ground water, as
t ransmission takes place more freely parallel to relict schistose
layers. t han normal to them. Shallow wells in saprolite have long been
a source of ground water for domestic use wnerever the weathered mantle
i s of sufficient thickness and permeability to yield ground water. Al­
t hough this shallow source of water continues to be of significance for
individual domestic water s~pplies, it seldom provides sufficient water
for· industrial or municipal applications. Aerial photographs and topo­
graphic maps show many subsequent s t r eams of th e Morganton area in
r ectangular-trellis patterns which are, by reconnaissanc e fi eld data ,
i ndicative of underlying joint and shear systems i n bedrock. Circula­
t ion of groun d wate al ong j oi nt and shea systems causes en l argement
of thes e linear openings by s oluti on wi t h consequent i n c r~asing perme a­
bi lity., pa~t i cularl y in gne is s ic rock t yPe s whi ch contain ca lc ic plagi o­
c lase an d in d ~l~mi t ic rocks. Surficially the increase in permeability
i s manif ested ·by de vel opment of linear depressions ove r t he underlying
DRA
F
T
-·-----------------p· I
ZONE OF
AERATION
GROUND­
WATER
ZONE
Figure 15.
0 C E AN
Simplified diagram of the hydrologic cycle and
subsurface water zones.
'·
.t-1 ••
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I•
I
I
pattenr of joint and shear systems. These linear depressions, generally
in re·ctangular patterns, are persistent for considerable distances and
range in width from tens of feet to about a quarter of a mile. They may
or IllRY' _not retain perennial streams, depending on topographic circum­
stanc:e·s. These linear zones of relatively high permeability are most
obvi-ous in the inner Piedmont, but they are present throughout the
Morgant·on area and represent the best sites for development of ground
water (pl. 1).
Dug and bored wells
The oldest source of ground water in this area is from wells dug
in the water-bearing saprolite or flood-plain alluvium. Bored wells
diffe~-from the older dug wells only in the manner in which they are
excavated and in their slightly greater depths; th~y are usually augered
througp..· .saprolite to or nearly to bedrock. Dug and bored wells are the
smirce·:··of domestic water supplies for individual farms or outlying resi­
dences ·not availed of municipal water systems. Of 125 dug and bored wells
inventoried, the average depth is 35 feet and the average depth to the
water table is 23 feet. The deepest bored well in the area is 150 feet
and .th~.greatest depth to the water table is 120 feet. Insufficient data
preclude any estimate of yields from these wells except that they provide
enough -water for domest ic use. Quality of ground water from dug and bored
wells · is generally comparable to that from drilled wells as re-lating to
hardne-ss or dissolved minerals. Risk of contamination in shallow wells
is ~eater because of their obvious nearness to possible surface sources
of con~ination. Bored wells, and perhaps some dug wells, will continue
to be « source of domestic supplies for new residences in outlying areas.
Caution should be taken to locate a dug or bored well at sufficient ele­
vation or distance from any septic tank, sewage field, barn, stable, sty,
or aimilar ·source of contamination. Tests for possible contamination
of household-water supplies from shallow wells should be made at fairly
frequent intervals. Water-table fluctuations are shown from monthly
measurements of 26 dug or bored observation wells in the Morganton area,
mostly in the inner Piedmont province, in figures 17, 19, 21, 23, 25,
and 29.
----------
--~
-_j
DRA
F
T
I
II
I
I
I
I
46
Drilled wells
Drilled wells are a source of ground water for individual, indus­
trial ., .and municipal water systems throughout the area. They are drilled
and cased thr-ough the residual saprolite mantle and obtain ground water
from ··f r actures or s_imilar openings in unweathered bedrock. The available
qu:anti t-y of ground wate~ ro drilled we lls i s dependent on the degree to
wh±ch e source rock is frac t ured and permeable to ground-water movement.
At greater depths, beyond about 300 feet, fractures or similar openings in
bedrock decrease in size and number; hence the average optimum depth of
drill.ed ·wells is not over 300 feet (table 4). Inventories of drilled wells
sh~w-that. most are about 6 inches in diameter. Larger well diameters will
provide greater yields due to increased number of intersected rock openings
and greater· rock surface from which ground water will be available. A few
industrial and municipal wells are 8 or 12 inches in diameter. Drilled
wells will generally yield greater quantities of water from topographically
low or flat areas and from draws or swales, as these features generally
· represent differential weathering of more fractured and permeable under­
lying bedrock (table 5). No attempt has been made to relate yield of wells
to the· many rock types of the area due to the deficiency of representative
well-s in each rock type. Fractures and similar ope~~rigs appear to be of
more -consequence to yield of drilled wells than rock type. Hardness of
ground .water from drilled wells is generally low. Locally, dissolved iron
may be -sufficient to preclude ground water from some industrial uses.
Jr·on in ground water of this area is probably derived from pyroxene,
amphibole, and iron-sulphide minerals. Iron may also come from ground
water contact with well casing, pump parts, and other iron objects.
Where· the well head is properly sealed, possibility of contamination of
water in drilled wells from surface sources is unlikely. Present rates
of ground-water withdrawal have no discernable effect on the water table.
Ground-water use in the Morganton area is negligible in comparison to
the amount of water available as r echarge .
Springs
High annual precipitation in the area of this investigation favors
a large· number of springs, particularly in the Blue Ridge prov ince. Sat­
·urati·on. of residual mantle and fracture zones in bedrock results in dis­
charge of ground water from the storage reservoirs where the water table
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
·I·
I.
·I· ! .
I
.I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
-TABLE ~. · Average yield of drilled wells according to depth in the
.1-lorganton area.
·· ·R:a.nie in depth Number Average Average Average
. ·(f"eet) of depth yield yield per foot
wells (feet) (gpm) of well
/ .
0-100 130 76 13.0 0.17
101-200 16~ 1~5 1~.5 0.10
201-300 .. t ~2 2~5 19.5 0.08
Deeper than 300 ~1 377 17.5 0.05
All wells 377 156 15.0 0.10
is intersected by land surface, usually in·draws or on slopes whe~e the
mantle-bedr.ock:con±act is exposed. Rate of spring discharge is dependent
on .hyaJ:ati.li·c· gradient of the water table and permeability where the spring
issues~from the ground-water reservoir. Fluctuation of spring discharge
is dependent on the size ·and permeability of the reservoir or source rock,
and ·on·variations in precipitation. Springs from large underground reser­
vtiirs ·of relatively loW permeability will show le~~ £luctuation·than those
issuing from small underground. reservoirs of relatively high permeability.·
Where ·.'springs are common in the Morganton area they are used for domestic
and"municipal water supplies. Most springs used are of small discharge,
l-to·3~gallons per minute, and the water is usually retained in a large­
~a~ity storage tank against greater-than-discharge demands of short
duration. Quality of spring water in the Blue Ridge province is generally.
very:-.:gqod, as it contains few dissolved mineral substances. Due to the
near-sur~ace -origin of spring.water, contamination is a possibility not
to lle ·.overlooked. Use of springs for domestic and public water supplies
should-receive equal consideration with. respect to possible pollution as
shallow dug or bored wells. Monthly fluctuations of 37 observation
springs in the area, mostly in the Blue Ridge province, are shown in figures
17, 19, 21, 2:;, 25, 27, and 29.
Municipal water supplies
<In the Morganton area there are 22 towns or communities supplied ·
by municipal water systems. Ten of these municipal sy~tems obtain water
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
62
Burke County
(Area, 506 square miles; 1960 population, 52,701)
Burke County is in the southeastern part of the area of investi­
gation (fig·. 1). It is mostly within the iriner Piedmont province, but
in the northwest it lies in part on the steep eastern slope of the Blue
Ridge province. Topography in Burke County is o greatly contrasying
r el i ef ; from monadnock-like hills separated by broad valley s in the
inner Piedmont to high-gradient , deeply dissected slopes on the Blue
Ridge front. Altitudes range from less than 1,000 feet above mean sea
level at several places on the southeast boundary to 4,350 feet on Long
Arm Mountain in northwest Burke County near Linville Falls. Burke
County lies within the Catawba River drainage basin. Streams and drain­
age courses generally appear to be of subse~uent d~elopment as they are
closely related to geologic structural features; joint and shear systems
are coincident to most streams.
The largest towns are Morganton, the county seat, Glen Alpine,
Drexel, Valdese, and Hildebran. The economy is predominantly agricul­
tural; about 27 percent of the county area is farml~~d. Forest products
supplement agriculture. Manufacturing, mainly of textiles and furniture,
is localized in and near the larger towns. The northwest tip of Burke
County is crossed by the Blue Ridge Parkway.
Metamorphic rock types in Burke County are heterogeneous, but
mica gneiss, mica schist, granitic gneiss, and shistose quartzite pre­
dominate. Structural trends of these rocks are generally oriented
northeastward (pl. 2). A unique diabase dike strike s nearly normal to
the regional structural trend in the eastern part of Burke County.
}fonadnock-like hills and steep, dissected slopes appear to be errosional
remnants rather than structural features. The residual mantle of weather­
ed bedrock or saprolite is well developed over most of the inner Piedmont
part of Burke County.
Drilled wells furnish much of the domest ic, industrial, and muni­
cipal water supplies, but surface-water storage provides the greatest
quantities of industrial and municipal water in Burke County. Principal
sources of surface water are the impoundments of the Catawba River in
Lake Rhodhiss and the Henry Fork of the Catawba River. The Lake James
impoundment of the Catawba River is primarily a source of hydroelectric
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
'•
I
I I
1
---·------
power. Most drilled wells in Burke County are less than 200 feet deep.
Of 62 such wells the average depth is 137 feet and average yield 14
gallons per minute. Wells having the highest yields are in: Low, flat
areas; narrow, linear valleys; or draws. Dug and bored wells are common
in outlying areas. Of 32 dug and bored wells the average depth is 40
feet and the average depth to the water table is 27 feet. Data of yields
from the dug and bored wells are insufficient to provide a statistical
representation. Springs are not as commonly used in Burke County as in
counties wholly within the Blue Ridge province. Glen Alpine and Rhodhiss
are the only communities in Burke County which use ground water for
municipal supplies. All other municipal water systems use surface run­
off which is filtered, chlorinated, and additionally treated before use.
Analyses of ground water from Burke County are shown in table 9.
Water from wells 59 and 104 contained iron in -excess of 0.3 ppm. High
nitrate and chloride concentration occurred in water from wells 3, 16,
62, 72, 88, 112, and 113. Well 62 contains water having nitrate concen­
trations greater than 45 ppm.
DRA
F
T
·I
64
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
l
I
I
I
I
I.
·~
I
I
I
I
n
0 c z ... -<
US 70 DRUM DUMP
NC D981472624
n
0 c: "' .. ..
-., .. . ij
RUTHERFORD
COUNTY
Figure 18. Map of Burke County showing locations of wells and springs.
EXPLANATION
•5 Wtll ,u Sprlno
0 2 3 4 !IMIIto,
8oM MOO Odopttd f"'"'
N.C. State HipoJ ~
I
LINCOLN
COUNTY
-+-~--liS"C
I -... N
L ..
DRA
F
T
-
I '-------
--TABLE 9. RECORDS OF WELLS IN BURKE COUNTY
Location Owner
Type
. of
Well
Depth
(ft)
2.7 Mi. W of Jonas Ridge-Blue Ridge Parkway Drilled 200
Diam­
eter
(in)
6
2 12.5 Mi. NW of Morganton-Optimist Park-----do--120 6
3 13.4 Mi. NW of Morganton-E. Sanders------Dug-­
'• 11.0 Hi. NW of Morganton-II. Perry-----Bored-
5 1.6 Mi. SE of Table Rock-P. Kinkaid------Drilled
33 30
32 30
70 6
6 1.8 Mi. SW of Table Rock-G. W. Crouch----do-105 6
7 8 .5 Hi. NW of Morganton-J. A. McGimsey--Bored-56 24
8 7.0 Mi. NW of Morganton--W. D. Lowder---Dug--50 30
9 6. 0 Hi. NW of Morganton--C. D. Nichols---Bored-70 30
10 5 .1 Mi. NW of Morganton--S. Miller-------do-80 30
11 1,,5 Mi . NW of Morganton-D. Galloway------do--45 30
12 1.0 Mi. E of Oak Hill---P. Deck------Drilled 200 6
13 5.0 Mi. N of Morganton--E. Weaver-------do--127 6
lt. 1._0 Mi. N of Morganton--C. Webb---------do--163 6
15 3.8 Mi. NE of Morganton--T. Dooley------do--lllt 6
16 5. 3 Mi. NE of Morganton--G. B. Arney---Dug--'<5 36
17 3,1, Mi. NE of Morganton--P. Jones-------Drilled 150 6
18
19
20
21
22
23
211
2. 5 Hi. NE of ~lorganton--
1.5 Mi. NW of Morganton­
!. 7 Hi. NW of Morganton--
2 .5 Mi. NW of ~lorganton--
2 .9 Mi. NW of Morgantoo-­
lt .O Mi . NW of Morganton­a. 7 Mi. NW of Morganton--
II. H. Speas-----do-­
J. C. Smith------do­
L. c.
E.
L.
Shuffler----­
Suddi th-----
Davis----­
Silvers-----
R. L. LaFevers--
-do-
--do-
Do red­
-do­
Drilled
219
132
150
152
92
52
73
25 2.5 Hi. NW of Glen Alpine P. Dale--------do-170
26 2. 5 Hi. NW of Glen Alpine P. Dale----------do-107
27 .3.5 Mi. NW of Glen Alpine C. Drowning--------do--115
28 5 .0 Hi. NW of Glen Alpine J, C. Smith-------do-165
29 L. 0 Mi. N of Dri d ewa lcr-J. Carswell-------do--131
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
Ja
39
ItO
.) Mi . No Dridgc"·atex-J, Cai'J!well---------do---
1.8 Mi. NW of Bridgewater T. Rich----------do-
2 .1 Hi. NW of Bridgewater II. F. Bobbett-----do-
0.8 Mi. W of Longtovn---J. C. Dellinger---do-
0.8 Hi, N of Longtown----W. P. Case--------d o-
1.1 Hi. N of Longtown---D. H. Bristol-----do-
1 . 6 Mi. N of Longtovn--I!. Edwards------do--
1.8 ~li. NW of Long town--R. Edwards-------do­
.2 ML "S o IJrirlgcwatcr-G. l!imphill------do-
6.0 Mi. SW of Glen Alpine C. Carswell-----Bored--
6 .5 ~li. SW o.! Glen Alpin J. McEla th----Drilled
135
115
175
75
165 v.o
184
165
215
60
300
(llO)
6 .0 Hi . SW of Glen Alpine J. Patton,---------do-210
6
6
6
6
30
30
6
6
6.
(,
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
30
6
6
Depth Water-bear-
of ing material
casing
(!t)
10
ItO
32
70
65
56
50
70
80
45
72
58
129
'<2
80
45
90
60
100
92
52
4'<
80
55
75 1,3
90
85
60
55
30
150
ll6
120
litO
60
60
'<5
78
Quartzite--
Layered
gneiss----­
Saprolite--
--do----
Layered
gneiss--­
Quartzite-­
Saproli te-­
-do----
-do------
-do------
-do----
Granitic
gneiss---
-do----
--do-----
-do----
Saprolite
Granitic
gneiss---­
--do-----
-do----
-do-----
-do----
Saprolite-­
-do----
Granitic
gneiss---
--do-----
Mica gneiss-
--do-----
--do----
Granitic
gneiss---­
Mica gneiss--
--do-------
--do----
-do----
--do-----
Schistose
quartzite­
Mica gneiss­
-do----
-do-----
Saprolite-­
Granitic
gneiss---
-do-----
Water
level
(ft)
Yield
(gpm)
Draw­
down
(ft)
Topo­
graphy Remarks
2'• '<0.0 105 ft. Draw-Water came from
80 35.0
16
17
20 20.0
70
t.8
35
50
35
70
5.0
).0
6.0
25 10.0
t.o· t..O
15
65 20.0
75
90
60
90
7'<
'<4
40
20.0
7.0
?.5
15.0
3.5
62 20.0
50 1.0
35 20.0
35 . t..O
60 9.5
60
'<5
6
50
50
65
80
t.O
35
7.0
4.5
6.0
8.0
10.0
6.0
15.0
25.0
'•·5
t.O.O
'<5 15.0
after six different
20 min. intervals----
Slope--Be<lrock @ ItO feet­
Flat--ObsC'l'vation well­
--do-
-do-
Slope-­
-do-
-do-
-do--Bottom on bedrock-
Draw­
Slope-­
-do-
-do­
Flat­
Slope-
Flat-Observation well­
Flat--
Slope-­
--do-
--do--
Flat­
Slope­
-do-
-do-
Draw­
Slope­
Flat­
Slope-­
-do-
-do---
-do---
-do--
Flat-­
Draw-­
Slope-
Draw­
--do-
liard water---
Slope-!lard water--_;:­
-do-
Flat---Drilled to 300 ft.
-do--
and gravel filled
to 110 ft.---
DRA
F
T
- - -- --- -I -... --- -- - - -TABLE 9· ll.ECORDS OF WELLS IN DU!lKE COUNTY (Continued)
Well
No. Location Owner
Type
of
Well
Depth
(ft)
lt2 lt,6 Hi. SW o Glen ALpine J . Farris---------Drilled 140
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59 60
61
62
63
61.
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
3.5 ~1i. SW of Glen Alpine H. A. Taylor-----do--141
2. 7 Hi. SW of Glen Alpine R. HcNeilley------do---122
~.2 Hi. SW of Glen Alpine W. Taylor--------do--333
1._9 Hi. SW of Glen Alpine W. Taylor----------do--315
1.0 Hi. SW of Glen Alpine T. Clontz---------do---100
0. 5 Hi. SW of Glen Alpine T. Rich----------do-150
Glen Alpine-----------Town of Glen --do--355
Alpine---------
0. 7 Hi. S of Glen Alpine-0. Brach-------do-119
0.5 Hi. SE of Gl en Alpine J. F. Proctor----do--86
1.5 Hi. E of Glen Alpine-Church---------do---300
Morganton------------D. Busic--------do-124
1.5 Hi. SE of Morganton--N. Epley--------do--176
1. 8 Hi. SE of ~1organton--H. Towery--------do--275
2. 2 Hi. E of ~1organton--C. Jl. Bumgarner---do--150
2.11 Mi. E of Horganton---J. S. Kinkaid-------do---. 90
2.2 Hi . E of Horgnnton---J, Farris---------do---71
4. 0 Hi. NE of Horgan ton-C. Leonhardt----do-235
Rutherford College------Valdese Gen. --do--400
Hospital------
3. 7 Hi. SW of Rhodhiss---C. Tunmire-------do--65
3-3 Hi. SW of fU1odhiss---Zirmnerman--------Dug--62
3. 0 Hi. SW of Rhodhiss--0. Habry--------do---45
2.5 Hi. SW of fU1odhiss---E. H. Aikens---Drilled 51
!:! • 1 Mi. SW of Rhodlli ss---L. Drown--------do-75
1.1 Hi. S of Rhodhiss---Smith-Moore Co.--Bored--35
Rh odhi As-----------------Rhodlliee Mille----Drilled 151
I1J10tlhiss------------------do--------------do--
1. 2 Hi. E of lfi ldebra n---Church----------do--
0.9 Hi. E of Hildebran--'-J. S. Hildebran--Dug--­
Hild ebran------------Quaker Headows Drilled
Hilla--------
Diam­
eter
(in)
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
8
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
8
5
4'x,4'
5'x5'
36
6
24
6
8
6
48
8
72 IIi ldebran-----------Clines Hills----Dug---45 48
73 0. 9 Hi. W of llil dehrnn--Southern Desk Drilled 200 8
Co. #2------
7'• 1.5 ~1L W of Hi ldebran---R. Stilwell----Bored-30 18
75 2.3 Hi. SW of llildcbrnn-J. D. Sweet---Drilled 180 6
76 8.0 Mi. E of Horgnnton--L. IUergeeull----do-149 6
77 5.0 Hi. E of Mo rganton~--M. Selzer-----do--1'20 6
78
79
80
81
82
83
I1.0 Hi. SE of ~1orgnnton-H. Moxley------do--
1"2 Hi. SE of Morganton-P. Smith----Dored-
2. 7 Hi. S of Morganton--F. Duckworth---Drilled
J.l Mi. S of Morganton--F. Hull---------do-3-'• Mi. S of Morganton--J. C. Digh--------do­
).1 Mi. SW of Morganton-J, Duckworth-----do-
298
36
120
132
133
H5
6
6
6
6
6
6
------------------------------·--------··-
Depth Water-bear-
of ing material
cae!ng
(ft)
60
46
60
65
85
60
60
86
43
75
80
70
60
80
16
30
55
-45
51
35
60
252
30
74
75
85
36
40
70
Io6
110
Granitic
gneiss--­
-do----
--do-------
-do-----
--do-----
-do------
-do-----
--do-------
--do------
G rani tic
gneiss--
-do-----
-do-------
-do------
--do--------
-do------·
--do-------
-do-----
-do---
Mica schist--
--do------
Saprolite--
--do------
-do-----
Mica schist­
Saprolite-­
Mica gneiss-
--do-----
--do------
Saprolite-­
Mica gne iss-
Saprolite-­
Mica gneiss-
SAprolite-­
Mica gneiss--
-do----
Granitic
gneiss---
--do----
Saprolite-­
Granitic
gneiss----
--do-----
--do----
--do----
Water
level
(it)
Yield
(gpni)
30.0
45 25.0
30 30.0
50 4.0
55 1•-5
35 9.0
65 5-5
255
60 20.0
10.0
60 5.0
70 20.0
30 t,,o
60
65 12.0
25 20.0
33 20.0
95
25
52
39
23
62 3.0
23
38 20.0
30
35.0
11.0
20.0
30 100.0
15
15 100.0
55 10.0
35 7.0
28
10
30
45
55
20.0
12.0
6.0
Draw­
down
(ft)
205 ft.
afte r 3
hre. @
20 gpm
Topo­
graphy
Draw---
-do­
Flat--­
Slope--
Remarks
-do--liard water-----­
Flat--
Slope--
Draw---Yleld questionable
--do--­
Flat--
Sl ope-­
Draw-­
Slope-
-do--liard water------­
Flat--
--do--
--do---
Slope-­
Flat-
--do--
--do-Observation we ll--
--do-
-do---
Slope-­
--do--
Flat---Water has high iron
content--------
--do--
--do--
Slope--
Flat-Water treated for
iron content---
Slope--Observation well­
Draw---Ideal well location
Flat-­
Draw--­
Slope-­
Flat--
Hill top
Flat--­
Flat--
-do­
Slope­
-do--
-
" ~ '':~
__j
DRA
F
T
! I
l_ -· -------··
84
85
86
87.
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
101,
105
106
107
108
109
llO
lll
112
llj
3. 5 Mi.
4. 0 Mi.
4. 5 Mi.
5.0 Mi.
l.4Mi.
5. 5 Mi.
5. 8 Mi.
6 .1 Mi.
7.6 Mi.
7.4 Mi.
7.9 Mi.
7. 5 Mi.
14.0 Mi.
11.0 Mi.
10.3 Mi.
8. 2 Mi.
6. 6 Mi.
6.8 Mi.
3.7 Mi.
2.6 .Hi.
4.0 Mi.
!).0 Mi.
6.0 Mi.
6.3 Mi.
7.1 Mi.
8. 2 Mi.
10.7 Mi.
1).6 Mi.
14.9 Mi.
15.1 Mi.
sw of Morganton-
sw of Morganton-
sw of Morganton-
sw of Morganton--
s of Glen Alpine-
SWo GJ.en Alpine
sw of Glen Alpine
sw of Glen Alpine
sw of Glen Alpine
sw of Glen Alpine
sw of Glen Alpine
sw of Gle_n Alpine sw of Morganton-
SW of Morganton-
SW of Morganton-
SW of Morganton-
SW of ·Morganton-
s of Morganton-
s of Morganton--
S of Morganton-
SE of Morganton-
SE of Morganton--
SE of Morganton-
SE o! Morganton--
SE of Morganton-
SE of Morganton-
SE of Morganton-
SE of Morganton-
SE of Morganton-
SE of Morganton-
J. c. Propst-----do--
P. Propst--------do---
M. Propst------do-
Hush Puppy Fish Bored-
Camp--------
B. Self------Dug---
T. Rich-----Drilled
J. o. Taylor-----do--
J. Allen--------do-
P. Dooley--------do--
Church---------do---
H. Patton-------do-
E. Tallent-----do-w. c. Burns----Bored-
D. Morrison---Drilled
c. B. Leonhardt---Dug---
L. J. Denton------do-
R. Rich--------Drilled w. Chapman-----do--w. Chapman-----do-
w. !L Mull-----Dug---
J. E. Huehlhouser-Drilled
F. c. Port-----do-c. c. Shouppe---Dug--
M. Willis-----do-w. R. Hull----Bored-z. c. Peeler---Dug--
R. E. Moses----do-
R. Tallant---do--
B. Hildebran----do--w. H. Iluffman--Do red
180 6 160 Granitio 25.0 Flat--
gneiss---
220 6 65 --do 70 20.0 --do--
153 6 85 Mica gneiss-58 6.5 Slope-
14 24 14 Saprolite--13 2.0 --do--
33 48 -do 28 Slope-Observation well-
103 6 70 Graci tic 15.0 Flat--
gneies---
165 6 50 -do-----38 25.0 -do--
158 6 70 --do-----65 3.0 Slope-Bedrock @ 90 !eet-
124 6 108 -do----5.0 -do--
195 6 55 -do-----62 3.0 -do-
132 6 50 -do 48 10.0 -do-
225 6 20 -do----20 20.0 Flat--
30 30 30 Saprolite--20 -do-Hard water----
100 6 60 Granitic 25.0 --do-
gneiss---
24 30 Saprolite--20 Slope-Observation well-
18 36 -do-----14 Flat--
105 6 20 Mica gneiss-20 20.0 -do-
210 6 20 Mica gneiss-15.0 --do-liard water
120 6 60 Granitic 10.0 --do-
gneiss---
55 40 I ---Saprolite--43 Slope-
185 6 · 115 Mica gneiss-85 5.0 --do-
175 JO 160 -do-----15 7.0 --do-
20 30 J -do----16 -do-Dug in bedrock ex-
cept !or soil at
surface
22 J6 22 Saprolite--20 -do-Observation well-
9 24 9 -do----7 --do-
12 30 12 -do 6 -do-
35 J6 -do-----20 --do-
26 30 lJ -do 16 --do-
27 48 -do----24 Flat--Observation well-
60 24 60 -do----jO --do-
DRA
F
T
- -
Well
No.
---
Location
lA 0.1 Hi. NE of JonllB Ridge
2A J,l Mi. SE of Jonas Ridge
JA 8.1 Mi. S of .Jonas Ridge-
--
Ower
---·--.
TABLE 10. RECORDS OF SPRINGS IN IlUilKE COUNTY
Type
of Well
Diam­
Depth eter
(rt) (in)
" '·' · ..
~· ..
Depth Water-bear-
of ing material
casing
(ft)
Arkose--
-do----
Quartzitic
arkose--
..
--
Water Yield
leTel (gpm)
(rt)
Draw­
dow
(rt)
-
Topo­
graphy
--
Remarks
-0'\
00
Slope-49° F. -4-9-62-
Draw-48° F. -12-12-61
Observation
spring:-..;.._-­
-do---45° F. -4-10-62-
\
-
________ ..... ~--.. _____________________ ... ___________________ .....
,·
DRA
F
T
GPM r---------~----~=:~ .~·--·--·--· T°F 5 ~-~--.~~C-------~-~--~
4 ~------------------~
3 ~------------------~
2 ~--~~------------~
OJ FMAMJ JASONO
2A, 3.1 mi. SE of Jonas Ridge
= 47 r----:--:----::::::=::::=--------, -~ 48 1------1-----.Jo~-----1
0 49 t------1-----T-----f
~ 50 t-------J-------~-----f
0 -51 .c Q. 52 Pr----~:.....,_ ________ __.:~
~ 53 1-\,..,......l:-.--_____________ --1
54~~~~~~~~~~~
62, 3.3 mi. SW of Rhodhiss
----~ 17 ..--------------~ ~~~I ~:::::=:::: ~
0 _21 J F M A M J J A 5 0 N 0
98, 10.3 mi. SW of Morganton
T•F
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
IS
-16 .:: 17
t 18 -"i 19 .e 20 = 21 0. ~ 22 JASONO
3, 13.4 mi. . Morganton
5 25 ~----;=.======--· l; 26 t----~~---~:----1 -~ 27 t-----+------~--1 2 28 1---__,,._ ______ ~
.c Ci. 29 J.-,C..~.,L-------------4
~ 30 lt--I~-L.-.J-~--1-......__,__-'---1-1.-.1
J F M A:M J.. J A S 0 N 0
72, Hildebran
~ ~ 15 ,__ ___ ...;.... _____ ___,
...
I) 16 ~--~-~~oc-------t 1 17 J.--...,c--:.....,_--.:~--------f
,g 18 h'----' -----~~---1 a. 19 ._ _ ___;,:..___ ____ .......;::........,~
~ 20 1.--11--l---L--L..--'---'--'--l---'---'-...__.. J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0
107, 6.3 mi. SE of Morganton
--~28 ...
:! 29 0 ~30
,g 31
:[32
~ 33 J F M AM J J A 5 0 N 0
16, 5.3 mi. NE pf Morganton
'
--~ 25 . .-------------------1
~ 26 1--------------~ 0 ~ 27 1-------------~
.2 28 1---~~:.....,_~-~-----f
:[ 29 J:li..----.J-------~---1
~ 30 1..-.....11-1-L~~~~-J--...L---1-~
88, 1.4 mi. 5 of Glen Alpln·e
~ --'-1) -0 i~~~=~ 1 1~1;:] 0 JFMAMJJA50NO
1_12, 14.9 ml SE of Morganton
Figure 19. Burke County observation spring and well hydrogrqphs, 1962.
... . .. .. . ... ··-----. ···-· .. -... ·----··.
DRA
F
T
---·---
...... . ..
~ ..... c:l
-= 0 "" .. .. c. u Gl Cll ..... ..... , ~ .. ~ ~ s < Q) , 0 .....
Gl Po ~ u rn c. ;... ..... 9 ;... .. ~ .. .. Cll 0 IC c:l Cll .. u u -.4' JJ .!C Q) ... Gl -.4 g g u .. =' .. ...
~ col 0 IC -.4 1"4 lZI ... rn Cl rn <
3 f(;n ~ I nu!f 33 Jan. 16, 1962 8.4 0.1 16 er c Du-45 Jan. 16 •••••• 5.5 .o 59 rnsh II Dr-400 Mar. 22, 1952 29 --62 rnsh c Du-62 Jan. 16, 1962 4.9 .1 67 rngn II Dr-151 Apr. 18, 1957 29 .o 68 rnsh III Dr-046 Apr. 18 •••••• 15 .o
72 men c Du-1~i JIJ.n. 16, 1962 4.3 .1 73 men II Dr-200 Jan. 12, 1!!63 25 --80 er I Du-33 Jun. 16, l!JG2 11 .o !JO men I Du-21 Mar. 21. ••••• 11 .o 104 men IV Dr-105 Jan. 12, !9G3 27. --112 mgn c Du-27 Jan. 16, 1962 a. a .1
113 mgn II B • 60 Jan. 12, 1963 12 --
---,. ---
TABLE 11.-CHEMICAL ANALYSES Of GROUND WATER FROM BURKE COUNTY
Ch 1 1 em ca 1 ana yses, 1 t n par s per m 1111 on
...... " 0 ~ ..... ..... ..... c:l tiO ..... ..... ..... =-..... =-w ..... .. ~ ...... (.) ..... l1 ..., ..... ..... "" Gl ~ 1111 IC ~ .. ...... ...... ..... Gl ..., 9 lZI El ..., cd ...... Gl Gl Gl "' ..... =' c:l , , 1111 Q) g "" -.4 g .8 Gl ..... ! " g " .. -.4 "" IC .. .. -.4 Gl = "" a ~-0 c:l u a -.4 -= ~ 0 ~ ~ , ... ... ~ =' d 1"4 .. col ... 0 i. -.4 -.4 =' 1111 M =-u =-Cll ~ ~ Cll
0.12 --5.6 2.1 3,8 2.9 0.1 23 7.8 3.a 0.1 .02 --16 3.7 25 4.0 ~· 2 ·31 .2 53 .1 .48 0.)0 17 1.7 7 ,<\ I --69 6.9 1.1 .1 .09 --1.3 2.1 45 . 5.7 .3 9 .a 52 .o .01 .oo 17 2.7 5.5 3.6 .2 76 7.0 3.0 .2 .01 .01 9.2 3.4 14 1.6 ,4 64 6.4 6.a .2
.04 --1.9 1.2 21 2.0 .2 (j 2.6 25 .o .17 --10 2.1 5.7 2.3 --51 6.2 1.4 .2 .07 --14 1.2 2.6 2.7 .1 45 1.a 2.4 .1 .15 .02 1~ 1.1 1.6 1.0 .o 48 1.0 1.6 .o .44 --3.3 1.0 . 5,8 1.4 --30 .2 1.0 .1 .12 --5.3 2.2 4.5 2.5 .1 1a 1.a 9.7 .o
.10 --4.6 ,3 3.3 2.4 --20 .4 3.0 .1
----
. .,
Dissolved Hardness
solids as CaC03
(.) ..... • .. 0 ...... 2 co " 1"4 0 ...,
lZI .. ,
Gl ...... Gl cd Cll .. g ... .. ... Gl ~ Gl IC gu; cd c:l ... .g ~ ,.8 cd Po =' ""CII .. " "" u ~a g~ ... 0 " ';; ICed -.4 If Cll lZI = u u:. lZIU
1.7 0.5 --48 24 4
14 1.1 --138 54 30 .o --98 98 49 --48 .o --164 12 5 .o .1 105 108 54 0 .a .1 '81 90 37 0
19 .o 82 00 10 6
.1 ----78 31 0
5.0 .a 68 64 40 3 .7 .o 55 55 30 0 .o ----55 12 0 4.6 .o --49 22 a
3.0 ----
-
Gl u ..... 5~ .. ,
UN =' , ..
c:l{lf 0 UVI 0 u.= ""EI ~0 ""'" uu
Cll-.4 P.Q = l'll""" c.
67 6.3
230 7.0
130 7.1
283 5.3
140 6.9
128 6.9
140 5.2
100 6.7
80 6.9
93 6.6
52 6.3
74 6.2
--...)
0
.. 0 ....
8
10
0
5
5
0
0
5 --10 --
5
39 13 0 49 5.9 --2A akp D s Jan. 16, 1962 ].:_4 _ • .:...~-L.-! 02 --.6 .1 1.4 .s .1 6 .2 .7 .o .1 .o --14 2 0 11 6.1 5 -1.1 Rock Type
qm -quartz-monzonite gneiss
msh -sillimanite-mica schist
gr -granitic gneiss
mgn • quartz-biotite gneiss
lgn • layered gn~iss
amgn • amphibolite gneiss
augn • augen gneiss
Begn • Beech Granite
arph • argillite and phyllite
akp -arkosic and pyroclastic rocks
qah • 1chi1toaa quart&itic rocka
qtz • quartzite
.... -··--l_/ Water Type
I • calcium, magne1ium, sodium bicarbonate
II • calcium, sodium, magnesium bicarbonate
Ill • calcium-sodium, magnesium bicarbonate
IV • 1odium1 calcium, magnesium bicarbonate
V • magneaium1 calcium, sodium bicarbonate
D • dlaaolved aolids too low to reflect effects.
of lithology upon water composition
C • excessive chlo~lde and/or nitrate masks
effects of lithology upon water composition
~./ ~
S • spring
Dr • drilled well
Du -dug well
B • bored well
DRA
F
T
't' •• •• • • ·---: ... ~ • ... • • ...: . -· , • •.•••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·1.
I
rl.
;:
I
1-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
80 ... ·_
McDowell County
(Area~ 442 square miles; 1960 population, 27,742) ·
·.McDowell County is situated in the southwest part of the area of
investigation (fig. 1). In common with Burke and Caldwell Counties, it .-·
lies partly in the inner Piedmont province and partly in the Blue Ridge
phys~ographic province. From southeast to northwest monadnocK~like hills
' separated by moderately wide, linear valleys in southeast McDowell County
' yield to deeply dissected, rugged slopes of the eastern Blue Ridge front
near-the Catawba River. Altitudes range from less than 1,000 feet in
.the southeast corner to 5,665 feet above mean sea level on High Pinnacle
at the ·northwest corner of the county. McDowell County lies mostly with­
in the Catawba River drainage-basin. Tributaries of the Broad River drain
a small part of southern McDowell County. The Catawba River courses north~
eastward near the Blue Ridge-inner Piedmont bounda~ and is impounded i~
· Lake James. Streams and drainage courses appear to be of subsequent devel­
opment, as they are mostly coincident to joint and shear systems.
Marion, the county seat, is the largest town and Old Fort is the
only.other town-of substantial size in McDowell County. Agriculture
:dominates the economy to which forest p~ducts are ..... :1.pplementa~. About
23 percent of the county is farmland. Manufacturing, mainly of furniture
and textiles, is localized in and near Marion and Old Fort. Quar~ing,
about 8 miles north of Marion, produces dolomite used mostly for road
metal. The northwest bounda~ of McDowell Count,y is traversed by nearly
40.miles of the scenic Blue Ridge Parkway •.
Mica gneiss predominates in exposures of the complex metamorphic
rock types of this area (pl. 2). Layered gneiss, granitic gneiss, and
quartzite are other prominent rock types. Structural trends range from
nearly.north to northeast. A deeply weathered residual mantle of sapro­
lite overlies most of the inner Piedmont part of McDowell County. Sapro­
lite is thin or absent on the Blue Ridge front.
Surface water is the source of municipal supplies for Marion and
Old Fort. The water is filtered, chlorinated, and additionally treated
before use. Drilled wells furnish water to many farms and outlying
residences. Most of the drilled wells are less than 200 feet deep. Of
27 such wells the average depth is 110 feet and the average yield is
14.5 gallons per minute. Drilled wells having the highest yields are
. ,.
I
l I I
DRA
F
T
.. ··' 81
1·ocated -in: low, flat areas; relatively· narrow, linear valleys; or
draws. Dug and bored wells are common throughout the inner Piedmont
portion of Mcpowell Coun:ty, providing domestic vater for farms and resi­
dences. Of '6o~dug and bored wells the average depth is 39 feet and the
average depth to the water table is 27 feet. Insufficient data preclude
statistical repr~sentation of yields from dug and'bored wells. Springs
are more commonly used in the Blue Ridge part of McDowell County. The
community of Little Switzerlan~ procures its municipal water supply from
springs.
Analyses of ground water from McDowell County are shown in table
17. Water from.wells 29· and 6'* contained more than 0.3 ppm iron. Water
""from wells 39 and 6'* contained high concentrations of chloride an~/or
nitrate. Analysis of water· from well 6 is noteworthy. Water from this
well had the highest pH (9.l).of any water sample4 in the Morganton
area, a strong "rotten egg" odor {hydrogen sulfide), ·and relatively high
sodium rind sulfate concentrations. This well probably is receiving water
from pegmatite containing sodic feldspar and sulfides.
.. ,
1·1· !.•· DRA
F
T
I 82
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
• c • ...
0
1: • ...
MITCHELL
COUIITT
RUTH[IIf'OIID
A V!IIT
COUIITT
• ..
COUNTY
.. .. ...
Figure 22. Mop of McDowell County showing IC'tc:Jtions C'lf welis :Jrd :Sf:rin;J~.
H
}
·~
US 70 DRUM DUMP
NC D981472624
·~·~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
l l
J
f t
I
DRA
F
T
- --.-------· --------, - - --- ---- -------TADLE 15. RECORDS OF WELLS IN McDOWELL COUNTY
Well
No.
2
3
'• 5
.6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
13
Location Owner
Ashford---------------S. C. Gouge-----
1.1 Hi. S of Ashford-----Sam Brown-------
1. 5 Mi. N of North Cove--C. Weathers-----
1.6 Mi. N of Nor.th Cove-J . G. Childera---
0.8 fli. N of No r t h Cove--D. McCall-------
6.8 Hi. W of Woodlawn----N. C. State Fish
l!atchery---------
7. 2 Mi. W of Woodlawn-----do----------
0 .6 Hi. N of Woodlawn--L. J. Robinson--
1. 6 Hi. S of Woodlawn---Ray Dyrd---------
2. 7 Mi. N of Marion-----Dill Nicho1a-----
2 .1 Hi. N of Hnrion------R. Lavender-----
2.0 Mi. N of Marion----G. Biddix-------
1.1 Mi. N of Marion----J. Lauder------
6. 6 Hi . E of Har_ion------K. Thomba------
Type
of
Well
Bored-­
-do­
Drilled
Bored­
-do­
Drilled
--do---
-do--
Bored­
--do--
--do--
--do-
Drilled
-do-
Depth
(ft)
37
27
120
40
16
253
120
190
16
7
60
12
137
ll5
Diam­
eter
(in)
24
2'• 6
30
30
6
6
6
30
18
30
30
6
6
15 5.3 Hi. E of Marion----z. B. Adams------Bored--1,0 30
16 4.5 Hi. E of Marion---C .. E. Edwards---Drilled 139 6
17 4. 3 Hi. E of Marion-----G. Mace-------do-130 6
18 }.8 Hi. E of Hnrion----0. Aldridge-----do--68 6
19 4.5 Hi . E oi Marion----G. C. Welch--------do--136
20 4.0 Hi. E of Marion-----Hollifield and
6
Church--------Bored-24 24
21 3. 7 Mi. E of Marion---G. Holland--------do--16 21t,
22 3.5 Hi. E of Marion----Lingerfelt----Dug--20 4''x4'
23 ,2.0 Mi. NE of Marion----V. Davia-------Drilled 237 6
2'• 0. 7 Mi. NW of Mnrion-----W. F. Morris------do--325 6
25 1.0 Mi. W of Marion----J. G. Hollifield-Dorcd--67 2'•
26 2.0 fli. NW of Marion---P. E. Edwards---Drilled 8/1 6
27 5.0 Mi. NW of f1arion-----G. Crawford-----do--310 6
28 5. 2 Hi. W of Marion---·--W. V. Shuford-----do-64 6
29 6. 2 Hi. W of Ma ri on-----Sam Parker----Dug--21 36
30 5.5 Hi. NE of Old Fort--T. H. Burnett----Drilled 85 6
}1 l~oO Hi. NE of Old Fort--W. R. McDaniel----Dug---40 30
32 2.8 Hi. NE of Old Fort--S. N. Allieon-----Drilled 57 6
33 1.3 Hi. NE of Old Fort---R. E. Evane-------do--63 6
3'• Graphite----------------------Bored-19 18
35 1.3 Hi. S of Old Fort----H. Wilson---·--Drilled 100 6
36 1.3 Hl. SE of Old Fort---G. R. Early------do--120 6
37 1.6 Hi. SE of Old Fort--T. B. Faw------Dug--)6 )6
}8 3. 9 Mi. SE of Old Fort-Church--------Bored-75 30
}9 '"8 Hi. SE of Old Fort-R. F. Cathey---Dug--48 '*O
'•O 5.8 Hi. SE of Old Fort--Bored-28 30
1,1 6.0 Hi. SE of Old Fort-J. Reel Drilled 79 6
lt2 6.3 Hi. SE of Old Fort--B. W. Simpeon---do-115 6
It} 6. 0 Hi. SE of Old Fort---A. F. Hill Bored-45 30
1,1, 1. 2 Mi. SW of Providence-F. J. Day -do-1•8 30
'•5 2.0 Hi. W of Providence--C. Wall Drilled 302 6
Depth
of
casing
(ft)
37
27
80
'•0
16
20
20
150
16
7
60
12
137
100
24
'16
100
85 '•0
35
50
19
80
60
36
75
28
62
75
45
48
58
Water bP.ar­
ing material
Alluviwn---­
-do---­
Quartzite---
--do-----
Alluviwn----­
Amphiboli te
gnei ss----
-do-------
Quartzite--­
Saproli te---­
All uvi wn---­
Saproli te----
--do--------
Layered
gneiss---­
Biotite
gneiss----
--do---------
-do--------
--do---------
Dioti te
gneiss----
--do-------
Snprol i te--
-do--------
-do-------
Biotite
gneiss---
Water
l evel
(rt)
25
20
.30
20
10
4.9
1
25
'* 2
5
3
72
25
60
12
7
14
60
-do-------80
Snprol i te----5'•
Mien gneiss-­
Layered
gneiss----
-do-----8
Saprolite---3
-do-----
-do----
Layered 32
gneiss----
--do-----
Saprolite----11
Layered
gneiss----
--do-----
Saprolite----30
--do----67
-do------43
--do------12
Hica gneiss-' 50
--do---------15
Saprolite----27
--do-------32
Layered
gnehe-----
·--··· -.
Yield
(gpm)
12 .0
11.0
9.0
).5
7 .5
2.5
7.0
20.0
11.0
8.0
25.0
75.0
15.0
8.5
8.0
7.5
20.0
~--/,""""::---.-..:...~-·-·~ ... --
Draw­
down
(!t}
Topo­
graphy Remarks
Flat---liard water-----­
-do---Slightly hard water
--do-----do-------------
--do---
--do---0\Jscrvn tion well--
Slope--S02 in water, not
potabl e---------
--do---
--do---
Flat---\Bedrock at 16 feet­
--do---Observation well--­
Slope--
Flat---
Slope--
Hilltop
Slope-­
--do---
--do---Iron in water----
--do---Slightly hard water
--do---
Flat---
--do---Observation well---
--do---
Slope--
--do---
--do---
Flat-­
--do---
--do---
-do---Observation well-
--do-
Slope-­
--do---
Flat--­
Slope­
Slope-
-do---
Flat---Often cloudy-----­
Slope--
-do---Observation well­
Flat---
--do---
--do---
Slope-­
--do---
--do---
-. .. ·.------~-·----···-·-~~~~~
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
I
I
I
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Mooresville Regional Ofhce
Ref. 18
James C. Martin, Governor
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
Albert F Hilton, Regional Manager
Ms. Pat Derosa
Environmental Health Section
Solid & Hazardous Waste
P. 0. Box 2091
Raleigh, N. C. 27602
Dear Ms. Derosa:
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
July 7, 1987
Subject: Technical Assistance
Well Records
Burke County, N. C.
In response to your r equest of Ju l y 5, 1987, enclosed is the following
information:
Two well records within a three mile radius of the point .2 of a
mile east of the intersection of Hwy. 70 and Dysartsville Road.
If you should have any quest ions, please do not hesitate to contact
this Office at [phone].
EJK:pb
919 North Main Street, P.O Box 950, Mooresville, N.C. 28115-0950 a Telephone [phone]
I [_ _______ _
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
I
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
ADDRESS: ------~::::::::;:=:----......;;...-~-:---
3. TOPOGRAPHY: draw, slop~, hlll,(!all~lat, ridge
IJ. RIG TYPE OR METHOD: kt(L fLt)T ' Use e • $ 1
5. TOTAL DEPTH: )(&,_! ft. Date j4tf-, (cf(3 f y-Z 7-4&
6. 'CASING: Dept~ ft.; Diam • .ftL_ in.; Type ~ { K·
Grout: Depth • Method -----------
1. SCREEN: from {ft.) to (ft.) slot size type
11./) ,
8. WATER ZONES (depth): __ .sr._:...,j_u_~----------
9. QUALITY: TEMP: ----
10. STATIC WATER LEVEL: ~ft. below top of casing which Ia
--2::.._ ft. (~below) land surface. Date ~'i 7-b ~~
IJ. YIELD: (gpm) '3 cJ Flow,~.b-~ ~11, Est.
..
L7 /h-) -I
0
(place this sheet over correct square
on map, match corners and circle a dot at well location.)
12. PUMPING WATER LEVEL: --ft. after_ hrs. pumping at_ gp•. Spec. cap. -----gpm/ft. of cl
::: :::~K::·· ReM K. ~·*"t d+~r"'!l 1/ ~ ·diu':·
15. DRILL LOG: Depth
Soil and Rock Formation From To
• ., • I
\
. .~ ...........
1
Hp. -----/($P
' •
;-o
~Cc7J
/tlP/1..'
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'·
MAP:
2· OWNER: H l?l--L.{..TC~t.. ~ t, "i) • jltiA1Tf? . (It, I? p.
ADDRESS: Me !? ({ A tl.T,. iJj, ;y, (?, '2 t?'b.\"'~,-
3. TOPOGRAPHY: draw, slope, hi 11' valley, flat, ridge
"· RIG TYPE OR METHOD: :-:1iR c I?: -./.l ? ,t
"Jt -~"-~),. .-. s. TOTAL DEPTH:~> L. ~ ft. Date . ...:.. 1--L.
6. CASING: .!..1-::J De;>th ___.:.!.. ft.: Diarn. _L_ in.: Type /)I ··I j./ ·'" .,... ,..~ l. ~
Grout: Depth : ~lcthod 'v
7. SCREEN: from (ft. ) to (ft.) slot size type w I E
I >--+----+----~
I
"'/ / ·"' . 8. WATER ZO!iES { c<:;.: h) : _ _::.._..;___, ____________ _
I I .-----!...-~--..,----· ·-----·j
9. QUALITY: ·------------THI?: -----I
f.
10. STATIC W!TE; -€VEL: 1 ft. ~ciow top of casin~ which i~ s
'i ,4."-·.~. "l-.: ---;·· -==-.. ft. .;;)ve, bel ow) l anc surface. Date-'-~----".:......-..:...._:___:_ \tl!acc this .... ·.·.;~t :vc:-COt"I"t'' .~iu •• re~
':Jo ·'"· , ,-) II •. YIELD: (g;:::: .:::; Flow, Pu::1p, Bail.~::-~\..
on map, r.iat.~. c ..... .~t.:r!::. and t.. • .•. 11
dot at well .o~a~~on.)
12. PUMPING w:.-,_,. _.:\'EL: __ ft. after. __ hrs. pum;>ing at __ gpm. Spec. cap. -------gprn' ::. of dd.
13. PUI-lP: type __________ , !ntake depth ------• ~ap. -----g pm, Hp.
I q, REI-lARKS:
-----·-------------------------------"----
15. DRILL LOG: Depth .~:~h
Soil anc Rock Formation From To Soil and Roc .... =::lrn:ation f;-:.. To
~·' I ~ I I ' I .-__ -::.· C I .f (,.-• .:.r \· I
"J:?c:,· .!..::·) 13i...li I I ~~:..-........ ·------------=-:..._!,_~~----------+-r. -+--1
I
I
i ------------+--t--1--------------·-·····-
1 I I ··-. -----··--------------L--.1---l--------------'----'--3
~~.:o ccpy-Department of Water Resources; Slue-Driller's copy; Green-Owner's copy, Form GW-1
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• LOCATION: TOWN _.;·._ ... ··:._: l~J-· ---------. ~·, ' ·;
MAP: I•
2. OWNER:. B (2e7,J~
ADDRESS: -----:::::;::=;:~'t;./.::::::'::1~---------
3. TOPOGRAPHY: flat, ridge
~­-~.L....:.=------Use -------
s. TOTAL DEPTH: ---ft. Date -----
6. CASIHG: Depth __ ft.; Diam. __ in.; Type-------
Grout: Depth • Method --------------
7. SCREEN: from (ft.) to (ft.) slot size type
a. WATER ZOHES (depth):---------------
9. QUALITY: TEMP: ----
10. STATIC WATER LEVEL: __ ft. below top of casing which Is
I I
L-
~ -
0
QUADRANGLE MO. ...
"7
~ )( .. I
__ ft. (above, below) land surface. Date (place this sheet over correct square on map, match corners and circle a
11 YIELD ( ) dot at well location.) • : gpm Flow, Pump, Ball, Est.
12. PUMPIHG WATER LEVEL: __ ft. after __ hrs. pu•plng at __ gp11. Spec. cap. gpm/ft. of de
15. DRILL LOG: Depth
Soil and Rock Formation From To
----~_.--------~ .. -~.
\ White co .. '
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HAP: ~-----------------------------------r~---------------------------------QUADRANGLE liO.
:,\\'!\ER: 'T? Rl.: N'TL·J {\~ i2 V\IIJ-7:!:!,':7 (I{) I? p N .
t.:;Dr:rss: '_All·'-' i? (!:A t./7i.:t/, ;V. \"': -= .·:/ k f.-.,~').\--7 ..
.:::-..1t~, slope, hi 11, valley, flat, ridge -I~ I /:! .-')·) 0 . / /U( v .\ :G ..... : ~~
Gr.;,~ . : ) ... · ~-~ ___ ; Method --------------------------
7. SC~E~!-1: rr.;,:;1 (ft.} to (ft.} slot size type
8. WATEI\ ZONES ~c. ;;th} : ---'--</J-:._~,._-____________ _
g, QU.'.LITY: -----------------TEH?:
10. STATIC t.~TE; _:\'~l: I ' it. ~cl~w top of casing which is
/ ---... ~elow) iand surface. Date .,;vve,
11. YIELD: (i;;::' .-I • -• 1 ~:~ J ~/"" J -----~··..:.-""'\,__ ________ Flow, Pur.~p, Baa , -t.-.-·~··'-
I
I
'-·----i---··
! ; ~~-~··-~r·
• I i . I l I "Hi r--i----~
' s
(plac~ Lhi~ shcc~ over correct ~qu~~L
on m~~. match c~rncrs and circle a
dot a~ ~t~: location.)
after ___ hrs. pur.~ping at ___ gpm. Spec. 12. PUl-l? lliG .. ' _;:.'EL: ft. ~I~. ~: .. ----------gpm/ ft. of
13. PUMP: it;.'---·
Pt· REI-lARKS:
15. DRILL .L.:O~:
5:)/l_
_____ , I nta~a cepth --------• Cap.
Soil and Rock Formation
Depth
From
· ....... · . -· '
To
---------gpm, Hp.
Depth
Soil and Rock Formation
dd.
To
--------------+--+-------...--------'--.. ·-·--
i
--·~-
White copy-Department of Water Resources; Blue-Driller!& copy; Green-Owner's copy, Form GW-1
DRA
F
T
'I ..
,_. \ · ..
' '
I ·, : ..•. 1.'·
1 ~. ----·-.l_
1 I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
... -}'.·
·1
·-·-··l··----1
; !
/
J
. ·,
I "-
l
j -~
-
··I:
! ·.~·~ 1~:: .. :) '~· ~0'
. ; . !4 ;:: i --: -~ \ 1:.,
-... : ~: j
-
'l;qd_, .··;·,.
/ I
--~-.... -~---:~---
·l·'-.."t!=.! t
·-113ft!:
'/f:'Boar--; .
1 'I~ m,, t . '4
:II' ·•.)G : -~ ~ ...
•' :_. ( . -~ ·... .
jlt/2-
. ·\I
. ·:~
,.;!
. . ,
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
22 June 1987
To: File
From: Pat DeRosa ~
Re: US 70 Drum Dump
NCD 981472624
On June 12, 1987, I spoke by telephone with Eric Klingel, Regional
Hydrologist for Burke County, Groundwater Section, DEM, NC NRCD
[phone], regarding groundwater conditions surrounding the subject
site. Mr. Klingel indicated that groundwater usage in the area is from the
bedrock aquifer. He also explained that the saprolite overlying the bedrock
serves as a groundwater reservoir. He indicated that there is no confining
layer or hydraulic separation between the saprolite and bedrock.
On June 17, 1987, I spoke with Bob Crawford, Hydrogeological Technician
working with Mr. Klingel. Mr. Crawford said that he had identified 13 well
records within the site vicinity and provided the following information based
on these records:
Average well depth = 252 ft.
Average static water level = 54 ft.
Average casing depth = 38 ft.
Mr. Crawford estimated the average hydraulic conductivity of the saprolite at
10-5 em/sec.
PD/pw/0384b
! Ref. 19
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
To: File
From: Pat DeRosa ~
Re: us 70 Drum Dump
NCD 981472624
\, Ref. 20
Jtme 16~ 1987
On Jtme 12; 1987; I spoke by telephone with Wade Knox; Water Supply
Engineer; NC DHR [phone] regarding commmity water supplies in McDowell
Cotmty ~ Mr: Knox knew of no community water system serving the portion of
McDowell Cotmty within 3 miles of the subject site~ 'lbe nearest comnunity
well systems identified, were greater than 3 miles from the site:
PD/pw/0384b
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
To:
June 18, 1987
File
I From: Pat DeRosa ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Re: US 70 Drum Dump
NCD 981472624
On June 11, 1987, I spoke with Martha Moore, Water Supply Branch
NC DHR, Raleigh, NC [phone] regarding community well systems within
3 miles of the subject site. Based on a coordinate grid of latitudes and
longitudes, no community well systems were identified in Burke County within
3 miles of the subject site.
PD/pw/0384b
Ref. 21
DRA
F
T
(
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----------~ ··------~-----·----··~ ~-.~~
To: File
From: Pat DeRosa (@
Re: us 70 Drum Dump
NCD 981472624
15 Jtme 1987
On Jtme 10, 1987, I spoke by telephone with Glen Berry, Chief Design
Technician, Engineering Department, City of Morganton [phone], to
determine the extent of water distribution from Morganton. Mr. Berry
indicated that the Glen Alpine water system is served and maintained by the
City of Morganton. We discussed the extent of water distribution from Glen
Alpine to the area within 3 miles of the site. These waterlines were marked
on the USGS map. Mr. Berry indicated that water service closer to the site is
provided by Brentwood Water System which also purchases water from Morganton.
PD/pw/0384b
Ref . 22
DRA
F
T
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
To: File
From: Pat DeRosa
Re: us 70 Drum Dump
NCD 981472624
I Ref. 23
June 16~ 1987
On June 11 ~ 1987, I spoke by telephone with Danny Henson~ Manager,
Bren~ Water System [phone] regarding water service within 3 miles
of the subject site~ Mr ~ Henson described the extent of the distribution
lines in this area while I marked these on the USGS topographic map~ Mr.
Henson confirmed that Brentwood purchases its water from the City of Morganton
and that they do not use any wells. He also indicated that although some
residents within the distribution area still use wells~ about 95% of the homes
with access to city water have hooked up. '!he system serves a total of 2~034
units.
PD/pw/0384b
DRA
F
T
. ' I I
I l
i
i
I
I
I i I
~;.~ co•:::> _EO :!Y STE=!f3?r-!OT03;:;::;.•.1~'.i::TRI:. l·'i::7HC'JS
Ill t.CCO~~!~:;E •,L--;H :--,;.Ti:)NAL /"-'.;.~?1!\:G s:;.,•::.;..:ms
BY
L:-\:\D\1.-\RK E\Gl:\EERL:\G CO., 1:\C.
CCi'lSU~ rwG 6 Prl::J ro~P./.MM~ ril/C E"llGI!I£ERS
? 0. BJX 6§4-c.:.RY, N. C.
P:-i,T03::.:.::o:-~r ~t.TE· !/27175 ?~3Jt.CT N':l 75-1
.._;;..<;..:, Y~T! "£1o."l C<Ctlt."~"IO'"• AT -r,.: e~t.a:: =<J : .. ~ '-~,;.,11 ~~se
-----------~---... ----·· ----·-·----~----------------·· --· -----·-------·-------
17 33
~"''] 16 32 ~'''"
400 0 400 8'JO 1:?00 1600 FEH 5~~ mrr::--nmrc;m~ .............. ~x:="" n;;:;;;;o;J
S:;ALE: r• • '-DO'
15 31
2000' (;FtJD E~ED Otl N'JRTH t:.RO'_I'IA STATE PLAN":: COJiHlii~.:.TE SYSTEM
-
:>:;:;.:>t:I;T'f 0~ iiJO{f".[ C::<;t;":"'f,.N:l-=<TI-1 Clo}ll)t~~A.
'-'.&.+'5 t.;;l"l" l~ &t ~~:>f<:O~J~E~ WIOH:l-! . .'"T ?."l'!i7i[t. Pt:>~,&SIOh'
. ----~·-~-----·--------------------------··--·-~~:~ e;r..,~ :_o.:'~~:~·.::~.~--~~-2~-_:::;~F . .-.t"'.!; ______ -----.----------
-----~------·. ---·-··----------·--~--~·· -----------------------------------.J -· --·---... -----------------------=-···-·····-
JSU llJ\JE
----,··-;:-; --.,---------------
3"~4
dr>u....t: ~
f;_,.J vr...U1
COUNT .1c
~;ORTH C.--\ ROLI:".-\
--or·;.r-;.-:--=------~-~~--·-·-·
(};
~--·
. /
67-
/0 (}
./
/ (
\
I
-~<.._ . .,. __
TO\IINSHIP
II.AP NO.
DATE
_.._ _____ ----~-----~----
(
.:..;...--; • .: ----;--=..: ------:-;:
i
I
1.
I I -I
.,
.!
j
l
I·
I
j
i
DRA
F
T
.. :_----==--..=--------·--·--·-----------
E U~6.000 ----------------1-'0( ~-~ ~----------
. -..
M..:..P .CC!'>1?:u::o 3Y STE;;E:?"".OTOG? ... ..:.'·'~·'t:Tn:G .'-~ETHCCS
IN AC..:CiiDA~.CE WlTn f~Ai.C'.AL ,\:AP~i:.O ST.J..';~,.:..RQS
BY
LAND:\fARK El'\Gl:\EEHI:\G CO., 1:\C.
. '
CONSC/t.T!NG 8 PhCTCfJP....;.~'-~J£TR/C Et:GJ,'EERS
P. 0, SOX ea~ CA::IY, N. C.
PHOTOORAPnY CATC:: 1/27/7~ PRC....ECi :'.0 75 ·I
,_
' t ! . !
~!i:OA.HAfi "!(.o.H 0£CL N,J.fiCS J.: HI~ CE:IIl i~ O"" r .. ;; C:O!,O;TY !V!S
& r~JJ Lj ~ -:-
/ tJ /(~ -z:. 7" _s
18 34
§:''';~ ~17$: 33 "'''~
16 32
-SHc.ET IZ..OEX
-----------------.:..·.::: ·-:.---·--:..:---~--=-... :-::·· .. -_£-~~-~--~-:.-_:::;;· •• ;.·_. 7"..;:--:---. ---------------.
------
. ~-_______ _:-
_-\. /
.· .. _/··
t ··­
' \.
\
)-_-/
/1
~I .. · ·.·.. ~· -.
(
.--
L_~-r~----------~~~----~----~~------------~------~--~~------~------~! c
400 0 ~00 800 1200 tEOO FEET =--~s;:;;;;:;:;;;-"="'" •=="""'"'"'E'--::""'-'l SCALE I~ • 400'
2000' GRtO BASED ON NORTH GAROL.r;A STATE PLA~.IE CCOrl:Dltl..\TE SYSTEM
PROPI!JIT't OF !IUR.(£ :::CC'lTY. ~CR!H ~;.Ot.!NA..
MAPS HOT TO 9E 1\E?~CCUC!!). N1Tr10UT •O!•TTfN Jl[iO..Io!;E;S,OV FiiCM al.iU<!: COU'HY f'lA.o,;"L';O C~ TAX OEf'Ai<l.VE.'iT.
1--/1
' / " / '----......... _//
• PREPARED FOR AND PROPERTY OF
BUR J{Jl~ -COU l\1T1T
NORT H CA RO LI ;'I;A
..
/
/ ./
/
.~
!
TOWNSHIP
MAP NO.
DATE
i.
......
I i
I
I
i I
DRA
F
T
MAP CC.MPILED BY ST£RE0Pri0TOGRAV,I'>',ETRIC fJ'ElHOOS
IN ACCORDANCE V.ITH NATIONAL t/,APPING STAND.::.ROS
BY
LA!':D:\1ARK E:'\GI~EERI:\G CO., 1:\C.
CONSULTf'V(; 8 PHOTOGR~M/11£TRIC E~'G!,\££RS
P 0 SOX 668 CARY, N C
P"iOTOG~A?tiY OA1E 1127/75 PROJECT NO 75·1
~-·
*
~~~0• ~.il( "'[j,N OECI.IHA.1o0f.. AT •..c[ C£11.~~1:" 0~ ~.,£ COcft,fY !iS~
5 19
~~]
17
SHEET INDEX
···-----
35
34
33
1<.. ·~ -~
2000' GRID 8"-SEO ON NOI'HH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COOR01N"ATE SYSTEM
?POPERTY Of OIURr..£ COU~TY, NDRTH CAROl.lt.IA
"'APS NOT TO 8£ REPROOVC£0, W!THO\.IT WIUTTEN PERMISSION ~FlO,.. BV'U,E COUNTY PLANNING OR UX Dl:PUITMEWT.
-,
\
~ I
I ' ""' 0
TOWNSHIP
.
PREPARED FOR AND PROPERTY OF
]flURii JP MAP NO.
DATE
l\ORTH CAROLINA
··~. '· -·-.. .
DRA
F
T
' .
I
r
i i
' I I . I
! I
. /
/
.. /
> I
!
! .
·.
. ' I
~ ·.'\ \ ·--··-. ·-·. _, 1·--· -·--·
. ...-:···.-···~--~---. ----.;;,..---::..--,-· -~--------.--:.--· --~--__;;_--·:; ___ ...
:e I-
I I
:I
' '
·, I (1
Y . . ·· I . ' I ,
I -..;:
~--~----~----~~----~~~~----~-------------~~~r-----~----~--~~-T~-T----~--~~-------r:~-:~~----~~---7------T-~~==----------~------~~~~--~~~= ·~ I . ~ ~ ~~
I
.I
I
I
I I !
j
J_ .-~-==:·--·~\ L......---/j_~~
MA? CGr•'P:LCJ 3Y STC:?.::VFriOTCQr<,:.·.w;:::-;;•c 'ti;::H-.OC.S
N ACCCRC..;.'~:E WITH :s,r:·~·;.:..L .. \;.?::::.~ S7.:.",JA~CS
BY
LA i\'D\IAR K E:\GI:\EERl:\G CO., 1:\C:.
CONSULTING 5 PHCTOGH"'·''.:.•ct~:C =;-.Gt•:E=Hs
P. o eox ese c..::..~Y. N c.
PHOTC~Jq;.?.-n o;;:E. 1/27/75 ?R::>...ECT 1>.-0 75-:
.,;:-o~-:-... ,~. ~=!·. ;:!<:: .... : ,., J.7 T.,;:: (:€\·;:~ OF r.,,: ~o.·.~y r9S6
19
18
17
35 50
~';''~ 49 ~34 :-;:
""'''
33 48
. -SH~ET lhJEX
! _lb __ -_= __ ·-_-__ = __ =_=_ .~---=-=~ .. _=~-~ ... --------=-~=_ .. ~. _=_-___ ~~=m~~~=~~·=~=~~~-----=-----~ .--.-~:-... ~-:~~~
~---------
.-
I
~-__; ~···.)y ..
I
400 0 400 500 12CO 1600 FE;::T ~-~ ...... .:.~~.:Z.'$11 ..,."..:~--::s:-....J.:::: ... =~--~..;d
SCALE· I" • .;oc·
2000' GR.D BAS::O ON ~~0~ C.;RCL:l'lA STA7E PLA.\~ CCO~:>INATE SYS7=:.'-1 I\O RTH CA ROLl :\A
c:J ::: . (j) ~ c4'..r lh ·b~-c::. ~
. I ii').~.S .. -
·==-----=-=-=~----~----------------~~
----=--=-... --·· -:=:._ --~-____ _. __ ;_.:.._.:_ ~ ~~-" -~---_ .. :-:....:: __ ~----~~----------·---· --·---------
'•
0 & .,
"' ....
~----------------~Z
TO W~ISHiP , .
.
·: .. , .
MAP NO.
DATE
··~ '
_'_ · .. .. _., .. . .
--:-~~--~----------· ·----........,-----·----.
' I ·--
' i I .•.
t -·
I I l
j
I
I ! !
DRA
F
T
_J_
!
1
I I I I
I
\
\
' ' ' ' ' ' '
/
'
)
' ' '
\
-..::.--::::-.::::.\ --
i I
\
~-~' --~-
~---~------~
-3 . 0
'
MA? cc·:;>_~J 2Y sr~;;:::-:;;.,::;-:-v::~.:..·.··.·:::-=.: ·.·:::·.,;os
iN ACCC~i:'.'.::..:E !J.i':"!-1 'lA:' -C'I,.;_ ,_,..;;~ '.:i s·A·.:;..;:;:s
L\:\!Y\J..\Rh E:\GI\TERI\(; CO., 1\C.
* ._I I I"
-~-!~~·;
;p ""-S c• 2~ ~-~
..,;::;..;:;, ,-~ ·:: .... .:.·. :<::. '"' • .;-•t :­'-£ 0:.!'.'£~ ;,, --~ :Ul•.:• .,~.;
16 32 _I 47
"-'·"'~! 15 ~ 31 " 46 _,,..;::::.
30 1 45 .
-~ ~ -'
./. . I )
: J < f"(__· __ _
I I i
;:c~~:;:y .!" ~ .. 1':!0.~ :.lUNil', :>j':Q7'i : ... ;;.:~ ,;.;
'0\;J>S \GT TO 30: ,:nc:.J..::::-. -.... :-.-cur ""'77E'l ~::::v.s.;;.c·•
;::oc·~ ~ .. ;,.:: :;~~~l "'·"'~'~'~ c;; r:.;~ )£.:>.:.;;·.,:: ... r
·------------~------------·· ----~--.. -----. r-;-----·---------~---:;--=-..._...... -----------.------~---
y
/'
-··-------
TOWNSHIP
COlJNT -1( MAP NO.
DATE
i\.ORTH C.-\ ROLl\,\
..
E ., -:.,:.~:,...
0 o_
. ·"' ----------------------g
z
8 o.
--~ ...
'z
. ~ c
--~-----.
·<
-· t
0 0 ------~~-~--------~ 0 ...
z
-
·_'.
.. ,, . .,-·, .
"
,. . . ,, -
L --
. ···. -,. .. .. .
' ;
_· ... ..
I
I
f I
I
DRA
F
T
-/
-A _ ./ \
:1 . .:.? cry..·,::>_::::: 2'' ST:::::;;::or..;)T03R.:.·.··.-::--:-PJ: ,,.::Tr~::Js
::-. ;.cco;:c:-,:,·.:E v.,-.., · . .:.·o·.:.L t-';..??8G s·.:.·.:.:.::s
BY
L\\"D\ I.-\ R 1\ C\G I \" E E R I \"G CO., I \"C.
~----·----_.:. __
D .
~;:;.;.:., "&!f ~~.<.·, ~[C..tt.-"l.::lr. 4T •..-[ :!·.~~" c;: r .. r c:.~.-.. 11 s~6
17 3 3
16 ~''~] ~~~,,
15 31
' -
4 8
47
46
,/
I
---1~--
I
I
I
/
1 .
I
400 C .!00 8 :>0 :2;::>::1 16-:.0 FEET m::::~-~~-OOI:::ll:u; FC'"":'"rr=~ s-:;.u::· 1-. 4oo•
l>' • .:.:>S t,~T -:, 6~ Ff<>O!~J ... .:EC. N."':"!-.:l_r." \lio'#:;~Hr. P!li!o'.t!StO~
~;:>"' c.,;,-.! :UJ!.~• :>_,,,.,.;~ c;. -.. x ~;:~ .. ;;~"!"'T.
----------·----------·--------------·
---~--'-'-----~-------.. ....__._ .• r_.._ ___ ••~--•-.-.-. -------"'-··-·-~•
·-=------~~~~=----------
~\0 RT H C_-\ ROL I~.-\ i • I ' ..
---1..= 7..-: __ (.A)a.>kL_d,l.t:k£h.tL b.~~----------··--·­
//']~
'. ;
i ! l.
\~
:.
TOWI"SHIP
IV.AP NO.
DATE
6 .... ..._ ........
------------------------·---· ·--------·------
I
z l
,.
' i
....
J
DRA
F
T
···--
/
DRY PONES COMMUNITY
tv'.t.P COM?lLED ev STEREOPHOTOG~',..~ETRIC METHODS
IN ACCORDANCE WlTh N~TIO'oAL y.;p::.p·~o STA.N::l4ROS
BY
\
Lr\.'\Dl\1ARK El\Gil\EERI~G CO., 1:\'C.
CONSULTING 8 PrtOTOORAMM£ f RIC £NGIN££RS
P 0. B:IX 668 CARY, N C
PHOTOGRt..PriY DATE 1127/75 PROJECT NO 75-1
------
z
\ )1
. I ···----
I
---4----~~~-------~~~n-----~~~~~~4-~---~~~~7-~~--~~-l~~~~~--~=--~~~~--~-!
\
*
AW~Ot ~ll( M(lo.h' ~Cl IO,ol,fJON Af
•oo[ C[r.;~ ['I Of 1.,;: C.O\IMTY 19!>5
18
17
16
34 49
~~3] 48
'"'
32 47
SHEET INDE X
···~
. I
/
40~0 ~~~0 ~~~·00~";;;;;~800~~~120~0 ~~1600 FEET
SCALE I" • 400'
2000' GRlO BASED ON NORTH CAROL.NA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM
Pi>OP[IITY OF" <IURKE COUNTY, NCRTH GA.ROLINA
MAPS NOT TO BE II(PilOOUCEO, WITHOUT WlhrT[N PERMISSION ~~"' i'lu..,!l£ COlii.'TY PLil!i~ING CFI Tl • OEPAiiTMENT.
\
>
/
\ )
?REPAREO FOR AND PROPERTY OF
:'\ORTH CA ROLI ~A
/
·,
I
I
I ~I I
·~~Ub~l'~-
~~~~~~----~--~~~~~--~--~~
z
' \
/ /
\
\
\
\
\
I
/
/
/ / /
TOWNSHIP
MAP NO.
DATE
·--'
/
I I
I I •
I
I
\
\ \ I
I
I
/ /
DRA
F
T
r.r,;.::: ~or.·= :...EC :n· ~1;:;::;:~p,.;,:nc.'3~.;·.·:.•t:7~tC 1-',;::TH:>DS
:-. "'c=or;i)I-.~JC£ v..'!n : •. :..·o~:;:.:... ro.·.;.:::?;~:; sT;.t~:.;.:=ms
BY
L:\.\0\l.-\RK E.\G I.\EERI.\0 CO., 1:\C.
p c :s:x 6€8 t .:.i:<l', N. C.
* TL . ·--· 'II I ~ o:'.'~,
1.:-:-~:.T .. ~·~ ... .&. .. :..£:..:t..1,1~ Af
! .. t ct ... ·ut ~ • .. c ~.1 .. ,,. •i~
20 36 51
19 ~ 35 ~,,,~
~'"" 50
18 34 4 9
.. : -"< 5 ,_£ 1 IN..,_X.
··-------·---------------------­------------~-----------------------. --·------~----------------------··. ·--~
----~----------_:__:_·_-__ -_...=~:.....:...: .=: ~------------~---~-
·. '.
-. .
,c-;~~-~-.;.;:;:~;-...;--;-;;;.~.::-~-:-:~ ~--, ·--~-~:~~·::.-;:-"T""-;-..;:-r;.~-=)-'~T ~3":::"· ---~~; --:-----------
·./-
'\f
\1_.
I ..•
t;QQ 0 <:OO 6!)0 1200 1500 FEET c.:::£:m=::t=~mo-...................... ' e; ~-~
S:.ALE· l' • "00'
o>::.~<>[i<1V c• 8J;!I{£ CO:JN'fY, ~::1\71'! C..:.=l~.l"lA,
lo'J.?S o,:;J 70 er ll!PPO:;IJ:!.~. W ~"O'J! I\'F!-Ii1Et. ?t~!"':UlOII ~-~"' Co..O,I'.! COJ',;l' P.A'I'I!\:;. C~ ':"U ;>!P.:.I<1'~<.;;10t,. --.------·--···· --·--· •• ··-~
-
-I -
··~.
TO'Nr-.!SHIP
II.AP NO.
DATE
~\ORTH CA ROLli\.--\
----~-· ----------------------·--------------------
----·"·--------------
--...
~----·--· --------
I l I I l
.I
I I
' .
-l
I I -•· !
DRA
F
T
! -i -
---~------------------------:-:----:--:-~;;.-.---~,--:-----,-.---:---·~-----..,..-;;--_---:-.--~--' ----,......----.-.~~--~-~. -~------·--·---~---------~~-------------------------------------------------------
r--:.:.P cc.·:~·-::~ 3, S1 ::iEO::>.;=.tro:;:::::;,·.~:.•:::;:::l: r-·::-noos
t\ .:..CCOr:l)A.'K;:: Wi":"h ~ • .:.11:•~;.,:._ !-•.;..;:::.,\3 ~-;..!DA;;DS
BY
L\:\0\L-\RK E:\GI.'\EER I .'\G CO., 1:\C.
? 0 . 3:JX 668 c.:..!:l:Y, N C.
PH':.TO::F .:.?;tY C.:.TE l/27/75 P?.;:)J£C.T !·~ 75-1
,c,:>:>:-:,-v ... '! Y<;".<.•; :~c_,.,q.::t. J.T • ... r :::•.·:::r. ~r , ... ~ :.o.•t..'• .s~r;
I I 35
34
33
50 6 4
~0-'"'-..> ~-4~--~ 63 . '' ..........
48 62
-:--, ... ~ '
--------------------------------.....,..---------------····---------------~---·---· ---
~----~--~--~--------------~------~---------------------=-~
400 0 ~00 BIJO l?DO 10~0 FEET ~~ttzi:oo::!::-e=•s~~~
&.::.ALE: 1• ~<:.DO'
.:>;..:..~t:l!":'Y :l .. !.JI!(!; ~J.;o, Tl'. o,~:i0-1'0 C.<.•O.!•;A
... .:.:.s ~w::· -: ii~ I'E::~:;:::..r::::t.. "''o'Tri'JU'i l•r!Q,i'iH' ""[l<M.E:.SION
__ -~ --------~--------~-----------~~: .... c.-·~ ::;·~.:~:o:,_..,.l,. .. ~_:,; .:=-l.-~:_?:_::_::_':'~T __ -----
~,ORT H C-\ RO Ll :\_-\
-·-----·--·--------'-[ _ __.--:; ~---~--~-··,.£/'n).J.u.Au~--
1/ 1'1 .e..,.,
TO'Nt-;SHIP
~"'AP NO_
DATE
----
'
1
I t
I
t l
r
I
DRA
F
T
MAP COMPILED BY STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRIC METHODS
IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL MAPPING STANDARDS
BY
LAl'\DMAR K ENGINEER! NG CO., I NC.
CONSULTING 8 PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERS
P. 0 . BOX: 668 GARY. N. C
PHOTOGRA.PHV DATE: l/21/75 PRo.JECT NO 75 -1
,, ,, ,. , . .. ,.
,I ·:
•' !! •·
i\ / l '-~
-I
-··--· I
'
\
T*L· I 111•
l"' li!IUi 0t> 24'
1 "'llS
APPI>QXI .. AH "'1£~ OECliH-\TiOt.l "'l HU' C(NT[ilt ~ fol( COU!rilt l~!i6
\
34 49 63
33 ~~~'~ 62
32 47 61
SHEET INDEX
I'·
/. ' \ \ ' ·.'-
I ! -, '
'·
! \
~ .
\~,-~· ~-~
D
0
0
.C)
\
u I .. /
-------'
/
\
)
• . !:!? .... CO
ROLLI\IG O.lK 'J.'OOD
. [ . 84.")0C
)
----------~----~~~~----_Ju_ __ ~--~~~u_--~ __ _J ____ ~-----~~~--~--~_u~ __ L_ ______ _L~~--l-~~----~~z
2000' GRID BASED ON NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM
PFlOf>£RT'I' 01" BUR«.£ COUNTY, NOIIHi CAROlllrilto
lr(..I..PS NOT 10 8£ II[PIIOOOCtO, WlT"OIJT NRITT[N PERMISSION
FROM BuCil".( QOUMTY 91.ANPIING OR ~ I)(PAATM£NT. -
?REPARED FOR AND PAOPERT¥. OF
JlllJ n J\ Jl~
'\ORTH CAROLINA
TOWNSHIP
MAP NO.
DATE
----------
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I~
TO: File
FROM: Pat DeRosa
RE: US 70 Drum Dump
NC 0081472624
July 20, 1987
On July, 9, 1987, I spoke by telephone with Louise Greg, Burke County
Tax Office [phone], regarding the 1987 tax maps I had received from her
office. She explained the map symbols as below:
Commercial buildings: Blackened.
Industrial buildings: Hashed.
Residential buildings: Blank.
1-!igh power lines: Boxed "x".
Fence line: "x".
0418b/PD/pd
' I I
\ Ref. 25
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
July 20, 1987
I TO: File
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FROM: Pat DeRosa e)>
RE: US 70 Drum Dump
NC D981472624
On July 10, 1987, I spoke by telephone with Danny Henson, Manager,
Brentwood Water System [phone], to clarify the location of water
distribution lines within a 3-mile radius of the subject site. From his
description, I marked the water distribution lines in yellow on the
topographic map and subsequently marked these lines on the Burke County Tax
Maps as well.
0418b/PD/pd
Ref. 26
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TO: File
FROM: Pat DeRosa
RE: US 70 Drum Dump
NC D981472624
July 20, 1987
On July 10, 1987, I spoke by telephone with Joe Silver, Land Records
Manager, McDowell County Tax Office (704) 65Z-71Zl, regarding tax maps
indicating the location of residences within McDowell County. Mr. Silver said
that no such maps were currently available, however, the 1980 US Census would
provide a fair estimate of population density. He estimated that 60 -80
homes are currently located in the portion of McDowell County within 3 miles
of the subject site.
0418b/PD/pd
Ref. 27
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I' .
I
I
.I
I
I
I
1-
I
I ,-: ...... ...
• . . ,
•.· -I ·' -
'
I
I
I
I
I
NorthC~mma&~eG~crrunecl
Statistical Abstract
Research and Planning Services
Office of State Budget and Management
-1
. l
DRA
F
T
- -
\JI
-- ---Table 8
1950 1960
Percent Percent
County · Urban Rural Urban Rural
State Total 33o7~ 66.3J )9.5~ 60o5J
Alamance 41.5 58.5 51.2 48.8
Alexander -too.o -· too.o
Alleghany -too.o -too.o
Anson 12.7 87.3 15.0 85.0
Ashe -too.o -1oo.o
Avery· -1oo.o -too.o
Beeufort J2.9 67.1 27.6 72.4
Bertie -too.o -1oo.o
Bladen -too.o -1oo.o
Brunswick -loo.o -100.0
Buncombe 47o0 5J,O 52.7 &t~ Burke 24ol 75.7 • 23.0
Ceberrus 66.0 J4,0 67.7 32oJ
Coldwell 18.2 81.8 26.0 74.0 Camden -1oo.o -1oo.o
Carteret J6,2 63.8 31.o 69.0
Caswell -1oo.o -1oo.o Catowbo llo7 66.3 44.1 ,,g
Chatham 9.8 90.2 16.6 83.4
Cherokee -1oo.o -roo.o
Chow en J5o6 64.4 JB,o 62.0
Cloy -too.o -too.o
Cleveland .35.3 64.7 J8,9 61.1
Columbus 8.4 91.6 9.6 90.4 Craven 32o4 67.6 26o7 73oJ
CullDer land J9,7 60e3 47,3 52.7
Currituck -1oo.o -1QO.O
Dare -100.0 -1oo.o
Davidson J9,7 60.3 J9,4 60.6
Davie -1oo.o -roo.o
Duplin -1oo.o o.1 99.9
Durham 20.2 79.8 . 75.6 24.4
EdgecollDe 40.7 59oJ 42.9 57ol
forsyth 65.8 J4o2 69.2" Jo.a
franklin 8.t 91.9 to.o 90.0
Gaston 55o2 44.8 61.8 .38.2
Gates -100.0 -too.o Graha111 -100.0 -1oo.o
Granville 21.0 79.0 21.1 78.9
Gr~ene -1oo.o -1oo.o
Gull ford 66.0 34.0 76.1 23.9
Hall fllx. 24.1 75.9 :52.7 , 67oJ
Harnett 20.3 79.7 22.3 71o7
Haywood 27o1' 72.9' 28oJ 7lo7
Henderson l9o1 B(),J l6oJ 83.7
llertford 16.7 8J,J J1,8 68o2
lloke -1oo.o 18.7 81ol
Hyde -1oo.o -1oo.o
I redo II 42.7 57.J 42.8 57.2
Jackson -100.0 -1oo.o
- ----· - --· -mBAH Nil RURAL DISmiBUTIOH Cf' Tll£ f'a'ULATIOH Cf' NMTH CAA«.INA COUNTIES
YEARS· 1950, 1960, 1970, 1980
197o(a) 1980 1950 1960
Percent Percent Percent Percent
Urban Rural Urban Rural County Urban Rural. Urban Rural
45.5~ 54.5S 48.0~ 52.0~
60.9 J9.t 64.6 35o4 Johnston 12.5 87.5 19.9 eo. I -too.o 3.4 96.6 Jones -too.o -too.o -100.0 -1oo.o Lee ~2.6 57.4 46.1 5Jo9
l6o9 ' Blot 16.4 8).6 Lenoir 39.9 60.1 44.9 55·1 -1oo.o -100.0 Lincoln 19.7 BO.l 19.8 oo.2 -too.o -1oo.o Mdlowell 21.9 78.1 12.5 <ihl" 24.9 75.1 20.9 79.1 Mecon -too.o -1oo.o -1oo.o -1oo.o Madison -100.0 -100.0 -100.0 11.6 88.4 Mort In 17.8 82.2 25.5 74.5 -100.0 12 • .3 87.7 Meek lenburg 71.5 28.5 78.0 22.0
52.2 47.8 62.9 ~ Mitchell -1oo.o 18.0 82.0 28.5 71.5 .34.8 Montgomery -1oo.o -1oo.o
64.0 )6.0 62.6 . .
Moore 12.9 67.1 14.2 85.8
)0.9 69.1 28.4 71.6 Nash 24.7 75,3 28.4 71.6 -100.0 -100.0 New Hanover 71.2 28.8 69.0 31.0
27.2 72.8 19.9 00.1 Northempton -1oo.o -1oo.o -1oo.o -1oo.o Onslow 18.2 a1 .a 20.5 79.5 42.9 57ol ,,B 44.2 Orange 26.7 7J,) 29ol 70.7
15.9 84.1 "·' 86.7 Poml leo -1oo.o -1oo.o -100.0 -1oo.o Posquohnk 52.1 47.9 54.9 5.3.6
44.3 55.7 42.7 57 • .3 Pender -1oo.o -1oo.o -too.o -too.o Perqulmans. -100.0 -too.o
.34.0 66.0 28.5 71.5 Person 17.7 82o3 19.5 8().5
8.9 91.1 16.2 8.3.8 Pitt )0.8 69.2 42.8 57.2
55.2 44.8 49.6 50.4 Polk -1oo.o -1oo.o
76.1 23o9 86.6 1.3.4 Randolph 15.2 84.8 25o3 74.7 -1oo.o -100.0 Rlchoond J4oJ 65.7 JJ,6 66.4 -100.0 -1oo.o Robeson 10.5 89.5 20o3 79.1
l7o1 62.9 JJ,4 66.6 Rockingham .38.5 61.5 41.1 58.9
1.3.4 86.6 10.7 89.3 Rowan 41, I 58.9 47.2 52.8 ..
14.9 85.1 14.2 85.8 Rutherford Jl,4 66.6 31.1 68.9
. 75.9 24.1 80.2 19.8 Sampson 8.9 91.1 . 15.5 84.5
47.1 52.9 45.9 54.1 Scotland 27.1 72.9 J2.7 67oJ
68.8 J1,2 75.2 24.8 Stanly 31.8 68.2 JO,O 70.0 tt.o 89.0 10.8 89.2 Stokes -. too.o -too.o ..
71.0 29.0 69.1 )0,9 Surry ,28.4 71.6 20.6 79.4 -100.0 -100.0 Swain -1oo.o -1oo.o -1oo.o -100.0 Transylvania 25.7 74oJ 29.7 70oJ J2o7 67.3 J4,8 65.2 Tyrrell -too.o -100.0 -1oo.o -100.0 Union 24.1 75.9 24.4 75.6
76.7 2J,J 75.9 24.1 Vance :54.3 65.7 )9.8 60.2
36.5 6J.5 37.1 . 62.9 Wake 5).1 46.9 6:5.2 )6.8
22.5 77.5 23.0 n.o Warren -1oo.o -1oo.o
27.9 72ol 24.5 75.5 Washington 34.0 66.0 J4,6 65.4
28.0 n.o 19.4 80.6 Watauga 16.2 BloB 21.0' 79.0 .
J6,6 6}.4 Jl,8 66.2 warne : 39.2 60.8 40.8 59.2
19.:5 80.7 u.s 82.2 WI kes 9.7 90ol 9.3 90.7 -1oo.o -100.0 Wilson 42o2 57.8 49.8 50.2
44.2 55.8 :53.0 67.0 Yadkln -too.o -1oo.o -1oo.o -too.o Yancey -100.0 -1oo.o
-- -
197o(a) 1980
Percent Percent
Urban R~ral Urban Rural
22.9 n.t 26.8 7J.2 -100.0 -too.o
.38.5 61.5 40·2 59.8
45.0 55.0 47o4 52·6 16.2 Bl.B II ·5 88.5
30o6 69.4 10.5 ~ -100.0 tlo1 86.9 -100.0 -too.o
26.6· 7.3.4 2Jo7 76.)
79.6 20.4 87.6 12.4
-100.0 -100.0 -1oo.o 12.0 88.0
15.2 84.8 23·8 76.2
32.2 67.8 40.0 60.0
69.5 .30.5 86.7 1.3.3
-100.0 -100.0
57.5 42.5 64.6 35.4 50ol 49.7 57.5 42.5 -100.0 -roo.o
52.4 46.4 49.2 50.8
-1oo.o 0.1 99.9 -100.0 -100.0•
20.7 79.3 25,.8 74.2
50.0 50.0 49o7 50 • .3 -100.0 -1oo.o
.30.2 69.8 30oJ 69.7 Jl,4 66.6 40.0 60.0
27 • .3 72.7 29oJ 70.7
44.7 55.3 40oJ 59.7.
42.1 57.9 44o2 55,8
JOol 69.9 28.6 71.4
15.9 84.1 15.2 84.8
32.9 67.1 J6,Q 64.0
26.0 74.0 3lol 68.9 -too.o 26.5 73.5
25.0 75.0 16.) 8:5.7 -100.0 -100.0 26.6 7.3.4 22.7 . 77ol -100.0 -1oo.o
25ol 74.7 2lo7 7Bo3
42.5 57.5 36.8 6:5.2
69.6 .30.4 11 .a 28.2 -100.0 -1oo.o
:54.0 66.0 l0o9 69.1
J7e4 62.6 32o2 67.8
46.7 5J,J 64.4 .35.6
6.8 9:5.2 10.9 89.1 "·' 48.9 54o5 45.5 -too.o -1oo.o -1oo.o -1oo.o
(a) Urban-rural percentages for 1970 were not corrected for all those counties which hed population corrections after the 1970 urben-rurat figures were published but wore corrected In selected counties by the Bureau of the Census.
SOORCE: Office of Stote Budget and Manageioont, Research and Pl11nnlng Scrvlcas. U ,$. Departu~nt of Commerce, Burtlau of the Cen~us,
-
DRA
F
T
-· - - --.. - -·---· ----- - --Table " 9
I, URBAN AND RUM.. DISmiBUTION ~ 1980 fa>ULATION AND PERCENT OWIGE FROM 1970, BY (X)UNT'f
Total Poeulatlon Urban P2fulatlon Rural P~ulatlon
1980 Census · $ Change Total $Of $ Change Total $Of . $ Change (b) Coun Of P ulatron(a) 1970-1980(b) 1980 . Coun Frm 1970(b) 1980 Coun Frm 1970
State Total 5,881,766 15.7% 2,822,852 48.0% 22.2% 3,058,914 52.0% 10.4%
Alomonce 99,319 ·~ \ 2.9 64 J 196 64.6 9.3 35,123 l 35.4 -6.7
Alex onder 24,999 . • 26o4 847 3o4 NA: .. 24,157 96o6 24 o1
Alleghony 9,587· .. 17.9 0 0 0 9,587 1oo.o 17.9
Anson 25,649 9.2 4,206 16.4 5.8 21,443 83.6 9.9
Ashe 22,325 14.1 0 0 0 22,325 100.0 14. I
·Avery 14,409 13.9 0 0 0 14,409 100.0 IJ,9
Beoufort 40,355' 12o2 B,4tB 20.9 -6o1 31,937 79ol 1Bo2
Bertie 21,024 2.4 0 0 0 21,024 1oo.o 2o4 Bloden 30,491 15.2 3,551' 11.6 NA 26,940 88.4 1.7 Brunswick 35,777 47.7 4,405 12.3 NA 31,372 87.7 29.5
Buncombe 160,934 . 10.9 101,281 62.9 33.9 59,653 37.1 -14.0
Burke 72,504 20.1 25,261 34.8 47.0 47,243 65.2 9.4 Cobarrus 85,895 .. 15.1 53,803 62.6 12.6 32,092 37.4 19.5 Coldwell 67,746 19.5 19,216 28.4 9.6 48,530 71.6 23.9 Comden 5,829 6.9 0 0 0 5,829 100.0 6.9
Corteret 41,092 30.0 8,185 19.9 -4.8 32,907 80.1 43.1
Coswell 20,705 8.7 0 0 0 20,705 100.0 8.7
Cotowbo 105,208 15.8 58,750 55.8 50.9 46,458 44.2 -10.5 Chothom 33,415. 13.1 4,446 13.3 -5.2 28,969 86.7 16.5 0\ Cherokee 18,933 15.9 0 0 . 0 18,933 1oo.o 15.9
Chow an 12,558 16.7 5,357 42.7 12.4 7,201 57.3 20.1
Cloy 6,619 27.8 0 0 0 6,619 100.0 27.8
Cleveland 83,435 15.0 23,740 28.5 -3.7 59,695 71.5 24.6
Colunbus : 51,037 8.7 8,275 16.2 97.3 42,762 83.8 0 Craven 71,043 13.6 35,228 49.6 2.0 35,815 50.4 27.9
Cunberland 247,160 16.6 213,919 86.6 32.6 33,241 13.4 -34.4
Currituck 11,089 59.0 0 0 0 11,089 100.0 59.0 Oore 13,377 91.2 0 0 0 13,377 100.0 91.2 Dovldson 113,162 18.3 37,836 33.4 6.7 75,326 66.6 25.2 Oovle 24,599 30.5 2,637 10.7 4.3 21,962 89.3 34.5
Duplin 40,952 7.7 5,796 14.2 2.6 35,156 85.8 8.6
Ourhom 152,785 15.2 122,470 80.2 21.5 30,315 19.8 -5.0 Edgecombe 55,988 7.0 25.712 45.9 4.2 30,276 54.1 9.4 Forsyth J 243,683 13.3 183,137 75.2 24.2 60,546 24.8 -9.6 Fronklln 30,055 12.1 3,238 ro.8 ro.r 26,817 89.2 12.3
Goston 162,568 9.5 112,378 69.1 6.7 50,190 30.9 16.5 Gotes 8,875 4.1 0 0 0 8,875 100.0 4.1 Grohom 7,217 1o.o 0 0 0 7,217 roo.o ro.o Grenville 34,043 3.9 11,843 .34.8 10.5 22,200 65.2 0.7 Greene 16,117 7.7 0 0 0 16,11'7 100.0 7.7
Guilford 317,154 9.9 240,860 75.9 8.8 76,294 24.1 13.4 Hollfox 55,286 2.6 20,531 37.1 4.5 34,755 62.9 1.5 Hornett 59,570 19.9 13,710 23.0 22.9 45,860 n.o 19.1 H11ywood 46,495 t1.5 t1,396 24.5 -2.1 ~5,099 75.5 16.7 Henderson 58,580 36.9 t1 ,346 19.4 -5.5 47,234 80.6 53.4
Hertford 23,368 -4.4 7,894 33.8 -8.3 1:5,474 66.2 3.7 Hoke 20,383 24.0 3,630 17.8 14.2 16,753 82.2 26.4
Hyde 5,873 5.4 ·o 0 0 5,873 100.0 5.4 I redo II 82,530 14.3 27,197 3:S.O -14.7 55,341 67.0 37.3
Jock son 25,811 19.5 0 0 0 25,flt 1 100.0 t'i.5
DRA
F
T
-- -lllllllston-.. 0,5~ .. 4 -... -.. ,.9-.... 66 ~.2-·--Jones 91705 -{).8 0 0 0 91705 1oo.o -{).8
Lee .361718 20.5 141773 40.2 26.1 211945 59.8 n.o
Lenoir 59,819 8.4 281361 47.4 14·1 311438 52.6 3.6
Lincoln 421372 29.6 4,679 ' ·11.5 -7.6 37,493 68.5 .36.9
McDowell 35,135. 14.6 3,664 . 10.5 -60.7 31,451 69.5 47.9
Macon 201178 27.8 2,640 13. I NA 171538 66.9 1t .1
Madlsoi"' 16,827 5.1 0 0 0 16,627 1oo.o 5.1
M~rtln · 25,948 4.9 61159 -23.7 ,-6.3 19,769 76.3 9.0
Mecklenburg 404,270 14.0 3531956 87.6 25·3 501314 12.4 -30.3
Mitchell 14,426 7.3 0 0 0 14,428 roo.o 7.3
Montgomery 22,469 16.6 21702 12.0 NA 191767 88.o 2.6
Moore 501505 29.3 12,041 23.8 to2.5 381464 76.2 16.2
Nash 67' 153 13.6 261863 40.0 '41.3 401270 60.0 0.4
New Henover 103,471 24.7 89,734 86.7 55o7 13,737 "·' •45.8
· Northampton 221584 -2.2 0 0 0 221564 1oo.o -5.9
Onslow 112,784 ' 9.4 72,891 64.6 23.0 391893 35.4 -9.0
Orange 77,055 :n.9 44,326 57.5 52~8 32,729 42.5 14.0
Pamllco 101398 9.8 0 0 0 '10,398 1oo.o 9.8
Pasquotank 281462 6.1 14,004 49.2 -o.s 14,458 50.6 13.4
Pender 22,215 22.4 24 o.1 NA 22,191 99.9 22.3
Perqulmans 9,466 13.6 0 0 0 91466 100.0 13.6
Person 29,164 12.5 7,532 25.6 40.3 21,632 74.2 5.3
Pitt 90,146 22.0 44,808 49.7 21.3 '45,336 50.3 22.7
Polk 12,904 10.6 ·o 0 0 12,984 100.0 10.6
Randolph 91,728 20. I 271774 30.3 20.4 631954 69.7 20.0
Richmond 451461 14.0 181210 40.0 36.5 271271 60.0 2.7
Robeson 1011610 19.8 291769 29.3 28·6 711821 70.7 16.5
Rockingham 83,426 15.2 331597 40.3 3.8 49,829 59.7 24.5
Rowan 991186 10.2 431806 44.2 15·5 55,380 55.6 6.3
Rutherford 531767 13.6 15,368 28.6 1·1 38,419 71.4 16.2 ...., Sampson 49,687 10.5 7,552 15.2 5.5 42,135 64.8 1t .5
Scotland 321273 19.8 11 ,606' 36.0 31~0 20,667 64.0 14.4
Stanly 48,517 13.3 15,110 31.1 35·8 33,407 68.9 5.4
Stokes 33,066 39.1 6,757 26.5 NA 241329 73.5 2.3
'
; Surry 591449 15.6 9,666 16.3 -24·6 ' 49,763 63.7 29.1
Swain 10,283 16.4 0 0 0 10,263' 100.0 30.6
: Transy I van I a 23 417 ' . 16.8 51323 22·7 1.5 161094 77.3 25.0 I . Tyrrell 31975 4.4 0 0 0 . 3,975 100.0 4.4
·Union 70,360 26.6 151254 21.7 10·1 55,126 76.3 34.9
Vance 36,-746 12.4 13,522 36.6 . -2·1 231226 63.2 23.6
Wake 3011327 31.6 2161334' 71.6 36.0 641993 26.2 22.4
. Warren. 161232 2.7 0 0 0 '161232 1oo.o 2.7
Washington 141601 5.4 41571 30.9 -4.3 10,230 69.1 10.4
Watauga J1 ,666 35.3 101 1?1 32.2 16.4 21,475 . 67.6 46.6
Woyne 971054 13.6 62,539 64.4 56.9 34,515 J5.6 -24.2
Wilkes 561657 16.4 61419 10.9 91.2 52,238 69.1 13.2
Wilson 63,132 9.6 34,424 54.5 17.3 26,708 45.5 2·0
Yadkln 26,439 15.6 0 0 0 26,439 100.0 15.6
Yancey 14,934 18.3 0 0 0 14,934 100.0 16.3
(a) Corrections to the 1960 counts for Pender and Randolph counties are not shown due to unavalloblllty of corrections for
urban and rural parts.
(b) Corrections to the 1970 Census for total urban and rural populatlo~ are tdken Into account In computation of percentages.
NA Not Applicable.
SOURCE; u.s. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Office of State Budget and Management, Research and Planning Services.
DRA
F
T
I
I
• SITE NAME AND LOCA T1 ON
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
PART I -INFORMATION AND ASSESSMENT
Ref. 29
II. IDENTIFICATION
SSIIE NAME CLegal, common, or descriptive name of site> • 70 Drum Dump j8~s:T~0ET, ROUTE NO., OR SPECIFIC LOCATION IDENTIFIER
03 CITY I Morganton
COORDINATES: LATITUDE 35° 41' 53" I LONGITUDE 81° 50' 17"
I DIRECTIONS TO SITE <Starting from nearest public road) Take 1-40 east of Morganton to the Lake James/
sartville Rd. Exit. T~ke a right at the top of exit; take this rd. to US 70. Take art. on U.S. 70. Go
approximately .2 miles, site Is or the right.
I RESPONSIBLE PARTIES
OWNER 1<1f known) m c-r·aw ey
CITY
102 ST~ET <Business, mailing, residentlel)
08 STREET (Business, mailing, residential)
I
07 OPERATOR (If known and different from owner)
I CITY 110 STATEIII ZIP COOE 112 TELEPHONE NUMBER!
~ TYPE OF OWNERSHIP (Check one)
XI A. PRIVATE [ l B. FEDERAL: ____________ <_A~ge~n....;;c~y) [ l C. STATE
l F. OTHER: (Specify)
l D. COUNTY [ l E. MUNICIPAL
l G. UNKNOWN
I OWNER/OPERATOR NOTIFICATION ON FILE (Check all that apply) (CERCLA 103c)
I A. RCRA 3001 DATE RECEIVED: ( l B. UNCONTROLLED WASTE SITE DATE RECEIVED [ l C. NONE
IV. CHARACTER I ZA T1 ON OF POTENTIAL HAZARD
I ON SITE INSPECTION BY <Check all that apply>
I YES DATE ( l A. EPA ( l B. EPA CONTRACTOR ( l C. STATE [ l D. OTHER CONTRACTOR
( l E. LOCAL HEALTH OFFICIAL ( I F •. OTHER:
l l NO CONTRACTOR NAME(s):
SITE STATUS (Check one) 03 YEARS OF OPERATION
( J A. ACTIVE [XI B. INACTIVE [ J C. UNKNOWN [ I UNKNOWN
BEGINNING YEAR ENDING YEAR
DESCRIPTION OF SUBSTANCES POSSIBLY PRESENT. KNOWN, OR ALLEGED NC Dept. of Transportation was working on a
dretnage ditch under U.S. 70 and a backhoe operator uncovered 25-30 drums. Contents of drums Is unknown; some
empty, some have material resembling dried paint, some have a grease like materiel, some have a granuler
DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL HAZARD TO ENVIRONMENT AND/OR POPULATION material. A few drums were broken open by
the backhoe operator and the contents spilled out. If hazardous wastes are present they can leak Into the soil &
11rundwater. Groundwater could be used by some of the surrounding residences.
PRIORITY ASSESSMENT
PRIORITY FOR INSPECTION (Check one.Dif hlghtlor medHium Is checkedttoomolete P1artd2 -t Waste Part ~ -escr1p on ot azardous vana 1ons and nci en s> Information and
J A. HIGH [XJ B. MEDIUM [ J C. LOW [ J D. NONE
( I n~g+ IvY requIred ( Inspect I on requ I r:-ed) .
I CONTACT
<lnsoectbion on time avataa le bas1sJ (No further action needed complete current disposition form>
lth Masters, Waste Mgmt. Specialist
,_PERSON REsPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSMENT
Mary Glguere/Lee Crosby
1
05 AGENCY 'ORGANIZATION 103 TELEPHONE NUMBERI08 DATE
NC DHR/DHS SHW Mgmt. Br. [phone] 07/03/86
FORM 2070-12 (7-81>
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3 July 1986
TO: File
FROi•f: Mary Giguere (\ftG
RE: U.S. 70 Drum Dump
A telephone conversation was held with Keith Masters of the NC DHR/DHS
Solid and Hazardous \vaste Mgmt. Branch about the U.S. 70 Drum Dump site. Mr.
Masters had been to·the site and had gathered information about the site. The
following is the information relayed to me about the site.
1) The site was discovered on July 2, 1986, by a backhoe team from
NC Department of Transportation (DOT). The backhoe operator was
trying to clear debris from the entrance to a drainage pipe
running under U.S. 70 when he hit the drums.
2) Nick Waters and Dale Murphy from Burke County Emergency Management
[[phone]], Mike Parker from NRCD-DFM Mooresville Office and
Keith r·Iasters and Larry Fox from DHR/DHS Solid and Haz. Waste
Mgmt. Branch responded to DOT's request for help. ·
3) There are 25-30 drums on the site. They are positioned at the
bottom of an embankment for U.S. 70. Some of the drums are empty,
some contained dried paint waste, some contain a white granular
substance and some contain a grease like substance with a greenish
cast.
4) Some of the material was spilled when the backhoe pierced a drum.
The DOT backhoe operator said that one drmn contained liquid but
it coagulated when exposed to the air. The backhoe operator also
reported a strong ammonia or chlorine odor in.the air. The
operator is reported to have had a rash break out on his arms.
5) DOT employees copied down the following information from five
drums:
A) Trylox H00-25
493-43-450
B) 20-18-55-75RSC
DOT 17BSTO
C) Acetic Acid 36
0-T-20-A-1
D) Lot 88654T40N500
RACA
E) Synthron
6) Synthron is a company with a facility in Morganton. Synthron's
president, Dr. Larry Bott, came to the site and after looking at
the drums said that none of the material present was from Synthron.
I
Ref. 31
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
7) There are no streams within a mile of the site. The site is
against the road embankment so the area might hold surface water.
8) Three samples were collected by Burke County Emergency Management
and three _samples were collected by Keith Masters and Larry Fox.
These have been sent by NC Courier to Mack Henderson NC DHR/DHS
SHW Mgmt. Branch.
9) Property owners from the current owner going back approx. 15 years:
Jan Crawley
Mrs. Johnny Baker
Thomas Mack Ray
Jack Farris
10) The contact persons at DOT are: Harold Stalcup and Larry Taylor
[phone]
11) Directions to the site:
MG/tb/0193b
Take I-40 west of Morganton to the Dy~artville/Lake James Exit.
Take a right onto Dysartville Road,-at U.S. 70 take another
right. Go approximately .2 miles and site will be on the right. DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
North Carolina Department of Human Resources
Division of Health Services
P.O. Box 2091 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-2091
Ref. 32
James G. Martin, Governor
Phillip J. Kirk, Jr., Secretary
Ronald H. Levine, M.D., M.P.H.
Zl August 1986
Ivls. Carol \~alsh
Emergency Response and Control.Section
U.S Environmental Protection Agency
345 Courtland Street, N; E.
A~!ant.~, GA , 30~65
.near Ms. Walsh: ·
SUBJECT: US 7 0 Drum Dump
NC D981472624
Stnte Health Director
As per' our telephone conversation tbis afternoon, please find the
following enclosed: ·
1.
2.
3.
4.
PA and documentation.
Laboratory results received to date.
Summary Trip Report for SI
conducted July 8, 1986.
Site photo.
If you have any questions please contact me :at [phone].
PD/tb/022lb
Enclosures
Sincerely, .
#r~
Pat DeRosa, Waste Management Specialist
CERCLA Unit
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management llt:mch
Environmental Health Section ·
I
'•
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~-...-;-STAr£:~.. • .-J'....,t!' _..,.I'll., ... ~ ....
(l ~:~;.51~~\ _;,~~-~-t~o/
····~~~
North Carolina Department of Human Resources
Division of Health Services
P.O. Box 2091 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-2091
James G. Martin, Governor
Phillip J. Kirk, Jr., Secretary
Ms. Carol Walsh
6 October 1986
Ronald H. Levine, M.D., M.P.H.
State Health Director
Emergency Response and Control Section
US EPA
345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30365
Dear Ms. Walsh:
Subject: US 70 Drum Dump
NC D981472624
As per our telephone conversation this morning, please find
enclosed the results of inorganic analyses.performed on samples collected at
the subject site.
PD/tb/0184b
Enclosures
If you have any questions, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
'-ilr~
Pat DeRosa, Waste Management Specialist
CERCLA Unit
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management BranCh
Environmental Health Section
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-·1
I
I
I
I
....-:""~~· < .. ~-~~ '".W·,._ /~ ( J '~~"' t .. ~; !*~ ~$ ~~ ::s . rlh'.. . >' l:S •:-; f-·,1Rf #\(~!_. -1 • (£/
~!),._.(<-~"··"" -.·.,?­...•. -:..-;::;.....
North Carolina Department of Human Resources
Division of Health Services
P.O. Box 2091 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-2091
James G. Martin, Governor
Phillip J. Kirk, Jr., Secretary
Ronald H. Levine, M.D., M.P.H.
30 October 1986
Ms. Carol Walsh
Emergency Response and Control Section u.s. Environmental Protection Agency
345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30365·
Dear Ms. Walsh:
Subject: US 70 Drum Dump
NC D98147Z6Z4
State Health Director
As per our telephone conversation this morning, please find the
following-enclosed for your review:
1. Results of organic chemical analyses performed on
samples collected at the subject site.
2. Chemical and toxicological data on hexamethylenetetramine,
an organic contaminant measured on site.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience so that we may
proceed with appropriate action at this site. I may be reached at
[phone].
PD/tb/0193
Enclosures
Sincerely,
/(q_;~-/Je /2-c~--
Pat DeRosa, Waste Management Specialist
CERCLA Unit
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management-Branch
Environmental Health Section
3
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TO: Lee Crosby
FROM: Pat DeRosa Pt~
RE: US 70 Dnnn Dump
NC D981472624
31 October 1986
Laboratory analyses of samples collected at the subject site on
July 8, 1986 have been completed. These results indicate methenamine
(hexamethylenetetramine CAS #100970) at approximately 7,833 ppb -28,542 ppm
in waste sampled at the site. This compound is not listed as a hazardous
substance under CERCLA (FR Vol. 48, No. 102, Table 302.4, May 25, 1983).
Methenamine is a moderately toxic irritant to skin, eyes, and mucous
membranes. It is water soluble. It poses a moderate fire hazard when exposed
to heat or flame and liberates formaldehyde on decomposition. Its major
industrial use is in the manufacture of phenolic resins.
I have contacted Carol Walsh, Emergency Response and Control Section,
US EPA Region IV regarding these findings.
PD/tb/0184b
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Lee Crosby
Pat DeRosa {t)
US 70 Drum Dump
NC D981472624
2 December 1986
I spoke by telephone with Carol Walsh, Emergency Response and Control
Section, EPA Region IV, [phone] regarding the subject site. She plans
to initiate an immediate removal action through ERCS. She will visit the site
on Thursday, December 11, 1986 to determine equipment needs and to identify a
staging area for the drums. The staging area should limit public
accessibility to the waste and provide an area where drums can be sampled and
temporarily stored until appropriate treatment or disposal actions can be
taken. She indicated that once staging was initiated, EPA would see the
removal through to final disposition whether or not the waste was deemed
hazardous.
PD/tb/pc
cc: Doug Holyfield
Julian Foscue
s
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TO: Lee Crosby
FROM: Pat DeRosa ~
RE: US 70 Drum Dump
NC D981472624
2 March 1987
Carol Walsh, the EPA OSC for this site, phoned this afternoon with an
update on the subject site. Carol said she plans to visit the site on
Wednesday, March 3, 1987 with the response manager or foreman to plan
removal. She will return to the site on Monday, March 9, 1987 to initiate
removal and staging. She has been in touch with Nick Waters, Burke County
Emergency Management, and Jim Fulver, NC DOT, regarding the start-up of the
removal action.
PD/tb/0187b
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX D
I SITE lliSPECTION FORM
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DRA
F
T
I
I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION ,
&EPA 01 STATE I 02 SITE NUMBER SITE INSPECTION REPORT NC D981472624
PART 1 ·SITE LOCATION AND INSPECTION INFORMATION . .
II. SITE NAME AND LOCATION I
01 SITE NAME (legal, c:cmmon, oraesc~ove name ot aile} 02 STREET, ROUTE NO., OR SPECIFIC LOCATION IOENTIAER
us 70 Drum Dump us 70
03CITY 04 STATE r5 ZIP COOE 106COUNTY J7JOBCONG OOOE OIST'
Morganton NC 28655 Burke 12 10 I
09 COORDINATES 10 TYPE OF OWNERSHIP (Chec~ one/
LATITUDE I LONGITUDE O::A. PRIVATE 0 B. FEDERAL 0 C. STATE 0 D. COUNTY 0 E. MUNICIPAL .3-.5.. 4-.l. ..5. ..3 • .0...8....1....5 .... L .. L7 0 F. OTHER 0 G. UNKNOWN
Ill. INSPECTION INFORMATION '
I
01 DATE OF INSPECTION 02 SITE STATUS 03 YEARS OF OPERATION
7 l BL 86. 0 ACTIVE ---I -----X. UNKNOWN
MONTH .. DAY YEAR ~NACTIVE BEGINNING YEAR ENDING YEAR
04 AGENCY PERFORMING INSPECTION (Chect .. -_,., I
0 A. EPA 0 B. EPA CONTRACTOR· 0 C. MUNICIPAL 0 D. MUNICIPAL CONTRACTOR
XI E. STATE b F.STATECONTRACTOR
(NatMotllnnJ ,_olflnn}
0 G. OTHER tNMMotlitmJ ~I
05 CHIEF INSPECTOR 06 TITLE D7 ORGANIZATION 08 TELEPHONE NO. I
Pat DeRosa Waste Management Spec. NC S & HWMBr 1919 733-2801
09 OTHER INSPECTORS 10TITLE 11 ORGANIZATION · 12 TELEPHONE NO.
Mary Giguere Industrial Hygienist NC S & HWMBr (919 733-2801 I
Lee Crosby Environmental Chemist NC S & HWMBR (919 733-2801
' I
( )
I ( )
( )
13 SITE REPRESENTATIVES INTERVIEWED 14 TITLE 15AOORESS 18 TELEPHONE NO
Jim Crawlev · Owner· us 70, Morganton, NC t7ot} 584-0627
I
.
Elgie McGalliard Neighbor us 70, Morganton, NC (7041 584-4300 I
·. ( J
( J I
I ( ,
( J
I
17 ACCESS GAINED BY 18 ~E OF INSPECTION 19 WEATHER CONDITIONS: (Check.,.../
lQ PERMISSION 0950 -1125 Su.nny, no wind, 90° F 0 WARRANT
IV.INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM I
01 CONTACT 02 OF (AgencrtOtgMIZIIIIott/ D3 TELEF'HONE NO.
I ~ .
Jim Crawley property owner (704 1 584-0627
04 PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE INSPECTION FORM 05AGENCY 06 ORGANIZA liON 07 TELEPHONE NO. OS DATE
Pat DeRosa NC DHR S & HWM Br 919) 733-2801 7 I 2ll 8:Z MONTH DAY YEAR I EPA FORM 2070-13 (7·811
I
DRA
F
T
I
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION ,
&EPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 STATE r2 SITE NUMBER
PART 2 ·WASTE INFORMATION NC D981472624 . '
II. WASTE STATES, QUANTITIES, AND CHARACTERISTICS
I
I
01 PHYSICAL STATES (Chockolth.ltoppty) 02 WASTE QUANTITY AT SITE 03 WASTE CHARACTERISTICS tChec .. l thotopoty)
(Musur•s ot waste quantifies
[XA.SOUD 0 E. SLURRY must be /ndependentl [X A. TOXIC 0 E. SOLUBLE 0 I.HIGHLYVOLATILE &}: B. POWDER, FINES E F.UQUIO TONS 0 B. CORROSIVE 0 F. INFECTIOUS 0 J. EXPLOSIVE
C. SLUDGE OG.GAS 0 C. RADIOACTIVE 0 G. FLAMMABLE 0 K. REACTIVE
CUBIC YAROS 0 D. PERSISTENT 0 H. IGNITABLE 0 l. INCOMPAT1BLE
0 D. OTHER 0 M. NOT APPUCABLE
tsoocWyl NO.OFORUMS .2.9__{55-gal) <
Ill. WASTE TYPE
I
I
CATEGORY SUBSTANCE NAME 01 QROSS AMOUNT 02 UNIT OF MEASURE 03COMMENTS
SLU SLUDGE
OLW OILY WASTE
® SOLVENTS ~PP list below I
PSO PESTICIDES .
@~ OTHER ORGANIC CHEMICALS
IOC INORGANIC CHEMICALS I
ACD ACIDS
BAS BASES
CMES) HEAVY METALS I
IV. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES tS••Aooendl•lo<moottreouenttyc~odcAs Numbe,..J
01 CATEGORY 02 SUBSTANCE NAME 03 CAS NUMBER 04 STORAGE/DISPOSAL METHOD 05 CONCENTRATION 06 MEASURE OF CONCENTRATION
SOL ' Chlorobenzene lv 108907 Drums dumoed 70.96 ppm I
SOL Ethvlbenzene 100414 in culvert 10005 ppm
SOL I Methylene chloride 75092 86.63 ppm
SOL I Toluene 108883 28.88 ppm I
SOL I Trichlonethvlene 79016' 103.7 ppm
SOL \ Xylene 1330207 3139 ppm
~m. I 1 ? -DirhlornhPn7e>n<> Q~~Ol 146 nnm I
SOL I 1 3 -Dichlorobenzene 541731 183 ppm
SOL I 1 4 -Dichlorobenzene 106467 387 ppm
SOL I 1.2.4 -Trichl6robenzene ,120821 3.46 -85 ppm I ooc PCB 1254 11097691 298 ppb
SOli \ Tetrachloroethylene 127184 79 ppb
ooc Bis(2-ethvlhexyl) 117817 224 mg/kg I phthalate
ooc _Mpf"_henamine 100970 *Not a listed CERCLA 7.8-832 mg/kg
MES Lead 7439921 haz. sub. 25.8 ppm I
. V. FEEDSTOCKS (SeoAooondl•forCASNumbers)
CATEGORY 01 FEEDSTOCK NAME 02 CAS NUMBER CATEGORY 01 FEEDSTOCK NAME 02 CAS NUMBER
FOS FOS I
FDS FOS
FDS FOS
FDS FDS I
VI. SOURCES OF INFORMATION rc••soeclllcreteronc••· e.p., .,.,. '"••· oompto onotysts. r•oon•l
(See attached) .
Ref •. 2-4, 6, 11, 15, 16, 29, 30 I
EPA FORM 2070·13(7·811 I
I
DRA
F
T
I ...
I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION ~ .
&EPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 STATE I 02 SITE NUMBER
Nt. nQH1a7?f>?L. PART 3 ·DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS
IL HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS I
01 XXA. GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: I XX POTENTIAL D ALLEGED
03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: IV 312 5 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION
None detected in nearest well sampled July 8, 1986 I .
01 ]0}0. SURFACE WATER CONTAMINATION 02 0 OBSERVED(DATE: I :XX POTENTIAL D ALLEGED
03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION I
No surface water sampling is known to have been conducted. Nearest surface water,
Reedy Creek, is 1. 75 miles from site. I
01XXC. CONTAMINATION OF AIR .. 02 0 OBSERVED IQATE: I 0 POTENTIAL iruhLEGEO
03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION
·Odors were rep6rte~ at the site, however, no·· s ignif ican t deflection-was,measured ·using I
the HNu.
I 01XJ{o. FIRE/EXPLOSIVE CONDmONS 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: I 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED
03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION
I Waste has been ·removed•
·• I
01 Xl(E. DIRECT CONTACT 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: I 0 POTENTIAL 0 AU.EGED
03 POPULATION POTENTIALlY AFFECTED: 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION I
Waste has been· remo:ved. i I
01XX.F. CONTAMINATION OF SOIL 02Q{OBSERVED (DATE: :Z-8 8:Z I 0 POTENTIAL D AU.EGED
03 AREA POreNTIALl Y AFFECTED: 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION .. (Acroa) ..
Soil contamination with bis (2-ethylhexyl)phthalate was measured.
01 0 G. DRINKING WATER CONTAMINATION 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: I 0 POTENTIAL 0 AU.EGED
03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 04 NAARA TIVE DESCRIPTION I
01 0 H. WORKER EXPOSURE/INJURY · 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: I 0 POTENTIAL 0 AU.EGEO
. 03 WORKERS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION I
' ;
01 0 I. POPULATION EXPOSURE/INJURY 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: I 0 POTENTIAL. 0 AU.EGEO
I
03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION
I ~
I EPA FOAM 2070·13 (7·81)
I
DRA
F
T
I
•
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION
&EPA. SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 STATE,02 SITE NUMBER
PART 3 ·DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS NC TIC)R 14 72624
II. HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS rcontirluedJ
I
I
01 0 J. DAMAGE TO FLORA 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: ) 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED
04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION I
.
01 0 K. DAMAGE TO FAUNA 02 0 OBSERvED (DATE: ) 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED
04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION ltnclucle Mmersl otspociesJ I
I
01 0 L CONTAMINATION OF FOOD CHAIN 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: ) D POTENTIAL · 0 ALLEGED
04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION . I i· ::-.)_. r --r • ."' ~J.:J. fi
01 ~·UNSTABLE CONTAINMENT OF WASTES 02 KJ OBSERVED (DATE: Zl8l82 ) 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED
(Splits/Runoff/Standing liquids, Leak/rig drums I ..
03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 04 NAARA TIVE DESCFIIPTION I
Uncontained drums were observed blocking a culvert under-US 70 •.
01 0 N. DAM.AGE TO OFFSITE PROPERTY 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: ) · 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED I
04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION
I
01 0 0. CONTAMINATION OF SEWERS, STORM DRAINS, WWTPs 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: ) 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED
04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPJION I
01 0 P. ILLEGAUUNAUTHORIZEDDUMPING 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: ) [] POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED
04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION I
I
. 05 DESCRIPTION OF ANY OTHER KNOWN, POTENTIAL. OR ALLEGED HAZARDS
I
Ill. TOTAL POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
IV. COMMENTS I
: I
V. SOURCES OF INFORMATIONICdespec~K:telerences,e. g .. srareMes. sampleanalys,.. ropo•tst ~
(See attached) I
I Ref. 2, 3, 6, 11, 15, 16. f
-··· .. I
I
DRA
F
T
-. •, ' . ~.:.. ~ ·., i .. ' •
I
oEPA. POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION
SITE INSPECTION 01 STATE I 02 SITE NUMBER
PART 4-PERMIT AND DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION Nr. lnq81472624
II. PERMIT INFORMATION .
01 TYPEOFPERMITISSUED 02 PERMIT NUMBER 03 DATE ISSUED 04 EXPIRAnON DATE OS COMMENTS
I
I
ICII«t .. tNt ot>t>/y)
DA. NPDES
DB. UIC I
DO. AIR
DO. RCRA .
0 E. RCRA INTERIM STATUS
0 F. SPCCPLAN I
0 G. STATE1s-:drl
0 H. LOCAL1s-:drl
01. OTHER ts-:Nrl I
HJ. NONE No known nermits
111. SITE DESCRIPTION
01 STORAGE/DISPOSAL (Chock or rhot opplyJ 02AMOUNT 03 UNIT OF MEASURE 04 TREATMENT (Cheek .. _~~ OS OTHER I
0 A. SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT D A.INOENERATION
0 B. PILES D B. UNDERGROUND INJECTION 0 A. BUILDINGS ON SITE
0 C. DRUMS, ABOVE GROUND D C. C:HEMICAUPHYSICAL
D D. TANK. ABOVEGROUND D D. BIOLOGICAL
0 E. TANK, BELOW GROUND 0 E. WASTE OIL PROCESSING 06 AREA OF SITE .
D F. LANDFILl D F.SOLVENTRECOVERY
D G. LANOFAFIM D G. OTHER RECYCUNGIRECOVERY ~ OJ4 (ACtN} ~ H. OPEN DUMP 59 55-gal D H. OTHER
I
DI.OTHER drums (Sp«<fy}
(SpoeHyJ
07COMMENTS I
..
I . ..
•.
IV. CONTAINMENT
01 CONTAINMENTOFWASTES(Choek.,.l I
0 A. ADEQUATE, SECURE D B. MODERATE 0 C. INADEQUATE, POOR IX D. INSECURE, UNSO.UND, DANGEROUS
02 DESCRIPnON OF DRUMS, DIKING, UNERS, BARRIERS, ETC. were found dumped at the bottom of an embankment on Drums, with no other containment,
the south side of US 70. Drums were blocking culvert under the highway. Some drums w I
re
.I open and spilled.
V. ACCESSIBILITY
01 WASTE EASILY ACCESSIBLE: @:vEs o NO
-02 COMMENTS Drums and waste were highly accessible from U~ 70 or neighboring homes. Site was
unfenced. Waste was removed March-April 1987.
VI. SOURCES OF INFORMATION tCHe spocmc retorences. e.g. srere '""'· umptoen•trsit. r•tx>d•l
.I
I
(See attached) .
Ref. 3, 11., 15 I
:I EPA FORM 70· 20 13(781)
I
DRA
F
T
I
•
&EPA POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION
SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 STATEr2 SITE NUMBER
NC D981472624 PART 5 ·WATER, DEMOGRAPHIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
II. DRINKING WATER SUPPLY
I
I
01 TYPE OF DRINKING SUPPLY 02STATUS 03 DISTANCE TO SITE
(C-kos-bi•J
SURFACE WELL ENDANGERED AFFECTED MONITORED
COMMUNITY A. 0{ B.D A.D B.D C.lO A. ]0 (ml) I
NON.COMMUNITY C.D D.:KJ D.KJ E.D F.D B. ,g79 (ml) . Ill. GROUNDWATER
01 GROUNDWATER USE IN VICINITY (Check"""' I
QCA. ONLY SOURCE FOR DRINKING 0 B. DRINKING
(Other $0Urt:os •-ble}
0 C. COMMERCIAL, INDUSmiAL,IRRIGATION 0 D. NOT USED, UNUSEABLE
(Unl!od Other IOUrt:OS 1-}
COMMERCIAL.INDUSffiiAl.IRRIGATION (No other w1ter IOCJtces IVI'-ble) .. I
02 POPULATION SERVED BY GROUNDWATER 3125 03 DISTANCE TO NEAREST DRINKING WATER WELL • 076 (ml)
04DEPTHTOGROUNOWATER 05 DIRECTION OF GROUNDWATER FLOW 06 DEPTH TO AQUIFER 01 POTENllAL YIELD 08 SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER
OF CONCERN OF AQUIFER
.rV 52 (It) -----nJ 52 (ft) ---·(gpd) DYES IRNO I
09 DESCRIPTION OF WEU.S C~ uougo, <top!ft, on<tloeeffon relotfvelopopu~atlonend bvldln(ls/
Private wells serve an estimated 3125 residents within 3 miles of the site. Most of
these residents have no alternate water source. Wells average~ 175' deep with 63' I
casing.
10RECHARGE AREA 11 DISCHARGE AREA I
DYES COMMENTS DYES COMMENTS
DNO DNO
IV. SURFACE WATER I
01 SURFACEWATERUSEIChockone)
0[ A. RESERVOIR,mcj;@ DB. IRRIGATION, ECONOMICALLY D C. COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL D D. NOTCURRENTL Y USED
DRINKINGWA t:R -H IMPORTANT RESOURCES I
02 AFFECTED/POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BODIES OF WATER
NAME: AFFECTED DISTANCE TO SITE I
Beed~ C:t:eek 0 1. 75 (mi)
Muddy ~:r.:eak D 2.25 (ml)
ea:tawba Ri:vef: D ,, (ml) I
V. DEMOGRAPHIC AND PROPERTY INFORMATION
01 TOTAL POPULATION WITHIN 02 DISTANCE TO NEAREST POPULATION
ONE ( 1) MILE OF SITE TWO (2) MILES OF SITE THREE (3) MILES OF SITE
A. ] 128 B. 4030 c. 6627 .038 (ml)
NO. OF PERSONS NO. OF PERSONS NO. OF PERSONS
I
03 NUMBER OF BUILDINGS WITHIN TWO 121 MILES OF SITE 04 DISTANCE TO NEAREST OFF·SITE BUILDING
·-v 1800 .038 (ml) I
05 POPULATION WITHIN VICINITY OF SITE (Pro""'• m<rraUve <1oscrtptOort ot nature ot population wnhln Yk:lrlnyol Silo, e.g., rural, .nn.po, <tansotypoput.rocl utban area)
The site is approximately 10 miles west of Morganton and 3 miles west of Glen Alpine.
This is a lightly populated rural residential/commercial area. I
. I
EPA FORM 2070·13 (7·81J I
I
DRA
F
T
I
I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION ,
&EPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 STAT~02SITENUMBEA
PART 5-WATER, DEMOGRAPHIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA Nr nQR1l.7?t;?l.
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
01 PERMEABIUTY OF UNSATURATED ZONE (Ch..:tOMI I
0 A. 1 o-e - 1 o-e em/sec ~-10-4 -1Q-6cm/sec 0 C. 10-•-1Q-3 em/sec 0 D. GREATER THAN 1 o-3 cmlsec
I 02 PERMEABIUTY OF BEDROCK (Check OM)
0 A. IMPERMEABLE 0 B. RELATIVELY IMPERMEABLE 0 C. RELATIVELY PERMEABLE O(D. VERY PERMEABLE < ' · (Lossi/IMI lo-6cmtsec) (lo-4 -10-a em/sec} clo-z-10-4 cmtsecJ (GrMt.,,..; 10-z em/Sec}
I 03 DEPTH TO BEDROCK 04 DEPTH OF CONTAMINATED SOIL ZONE OS SOIL pH
fjd (fl) (default) 6 (fl} --
06 NET PRECIPITATION 07 ONE YEAR 24 HOUR RAJNFALL OS SLOPE
SITE SLOPE I DIRECTION OF SITE SLOPE I TERRAIN AVERAGE SLOPE
16 : 3.5 2 % south 2.3 (in) · (in) % I
09 FLOOD POTENTIAL 10
0 SITE IS ON BARRIER ISLAND, COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA, RIVERINE FLOODWAY SITE IS IN ---YEAR FLOODPLAIN I 11 DISTANCE TO WETLANDS (5 ICIW __ , 12 DISTANCE TO CRITICAL HABITAT (oi--IWd _,.,,
ESTUARINE OTHER > ] (ml)
A. }: 2 (mil B. )l (ml) ENDANGERED SPECIES: NA I
13 LAND USE IN VICINITY.
...
DISTANCE TO:
RESIDENTIAL AREAS; NATIONAUSTATE PARKS, AGRICULTURAL LANDS
COMMERCIAUlNDUSTRIAL FORESTS, OR WILOUFE RESERVES PRIME AG LAND AGLAND I
.•
A. ] 5 (mil B. .038 (ml} c. nnk. (ml) D. ~] (ml) ·I
14 DESCRIPTION OF SITE IN RELATION TO SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY
The site is located at the bottom of an embankment on the south side of US 70.
Drums were located in the mouth of the culvert under the highway. The site is
surrounded by the rolling·hill~-characteristic of western piedmont region of N.C. I
I
I .
I
I
;
I VII. SOURCES OF INFORMATION tCil•~~>«Nic roto,.ncos. •·O·· stat• ,..,, -anllfs'-. roponsJ
I
(See attached) .
Ref. 1, 3, 6, 8-14, 17·, 19-28.
I E AFORM2070 13(7 81) p
I
DRA
F
T
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE &EPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT
PART6·SAMPLE AND FIELD INFORMATION
II. SAMPLES TAKEN
01 NUMBER OF 02 SAMPLES SENT TO
SAMPLE TYPE SAMPLES TAKEN
GROUNDWATER 1 State Laboratorv of Public Health.
SURFACE WATER Nr. mm R<l1 ,:do-h N'r.
WASTE 5 State·Lahoratorv of Pub};,.. HP<l1t-h
AIR NC DHR. Raleigh. NC
RUNOFF
SPILL . SOIL 3 State Laboratorv of Public Health
VEGETATION NC DHR, Raleigh, NC ! •
OTHER
Ill. FIELD MEASUREMENTS TAKEN
011YPE D2COMMENTS
IV. PHOTOGRAPHS AND MAPS
01 TYPE IX GROUND 0 AERIAL I 02 IN CUSTODY OF NC CEBCI,A IInH
(Nitn8 of O'l/111/zatlon or lndi1rld1MIJ
03 MAPS I 04 LOCATION OF MAPS !X YES Attached
· ONO
V. OTHER FIELD DATA COLLECTED IProWdon.-tvodoscrlptionJ
HNu -bkgd N 1 ppm
No significant increase measured.
-:
VI. SOURCES OF INFORMATION reno wocmcroteronc••· o.g .• .,.,.mos. ssmpl.,nstrsis. report•!
(See attached)
Ref. 2, 11
EPA FORM 2070·13 (7·81)
I. IDENTIFICATION
01 STATE,02 SITE NUMBER
Nr. DQR147%?t..
03 ESTIMATED DATE
RESULTS AVI'Jt.NJU:
10-16-86
.-,.
10-16-86
--..
10-16-86
•
.
I
I
-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DRA
F
T
II
I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION &EPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 STATE r2 SITE NUMBER
NC D981472624 PART 7 ·OWNER INFORMATION
II. CURRENT OWNER(S) PARENT COMPANY lffapp/lc«bbeJ I
j01NAME 02D+BNUMBER 08 NAME 09D+BNUMBER
Jim Crawley-.
03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. So•. RFD I, otc.J _r•srccoDE 1 0 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. So•. RFD I, otc.J r1~CCODE
US Hwy 70, Rt. 2; Box 414A
I
OS CITY ·reSTATE 07ZIPCODE 12CITY 1'3STATE 14ZIPCOOE .
Morganton NC 28655
01NAME 02 D+B NUMBER 08 NAME 09D+BNUMBER
I 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. So•. RFD 1, otc.J r4$1CCODE 10 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. So•, RFD I, otc.J rt~CCODE
OS CITY r6STATE 07 ZIPCOOE 12 CITY . r3STATE 14ZIPCODE .
01NAME 02 D+B NUMBER OeNAME 090+BNUMBER I
03 STREET AOORESS(P.O. So•. RFDI,otc.l r4SICCOOE 10 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. eo.: RFO I, otc.J IIISICCOOE
OS CITY _reSTATE 07ZIPCODE 12CITY r3STATE 14ZIPCODE ..
OtNAME 02 D+ B NUMBER OBNAME 09D+BNUMBER
I
I
03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. So•, RFO I, otc.J r·SICCO~E 1 0 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. So•. RFD 1. otc.J r~CCODE
OS CITY . reSTAT 07 ZIP CODE 12CITY J3STATE 14ZIPCODE . I
Ill. PREVIOUS OWNER(S) Mt most,.,., t~tstl· IV. REAL TV OWNER(S) ,,.,.,_,,.,,.,.,..c•ntllrlrl
01NAME 02 D+B NUMBER OtNAME 02D+BNUMBER I Mrs. Johnny Baker
03 STREET ADDRESS (P.o. eo., RFO 1, otc.J I 04SICCODE 03 STREET ADDRESSIP.O. So•. RFDI, ore.} ·104~CCODE
OS CITY 106STATE 07ZIPCODE OS CITY .loasrATE 07ZIPCODE
Morganton NC
I
01NAME 02 D+B NUMBER 01NAME 02D+BNUMBER ..
Thomas Mack Ray I
03 STREET ADDRESS!P.O. So•. RFDI, etc.} 104SICCODE 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. eo., RFO I, otc.J ~04~CCODE
OS CITY reSTATE 07ZIPCODE OS CITY reSTATE 07ZIPCODE
Morganton NC · I
01NAME 02D+BNUMBER OINAME 02 0+9 NUMBER
Jack Farris
03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. Bot. RFQ.I. otc.J 10.4 SIC CODE 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. eo.. RFO I, otc.J 104SICCODE
:
I
OS CITY . reSTATE 07ZIPCOOE OS CITY reSTATE 07ZIPCODE
Morganton NC I
V. SOURCES OF INFORMATION rcnespecHtc retorences. e.g., •t•tetllo•. ·-••oJrsiS, report•l
~
I'See attached) I
Ref. 11. I EPA FORM 2070-13 (7·811
I
DRA
F
T
I
•
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION
&EPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 STATE I 02 SITE NUMBER
PART 8 ·OPERATOR INFORMATION NC D9814 726 24
II. CURRENT OPERATOR (Pto-ltllff;,.nrltOmo,.,o~ OPERATOR'S PARENT COMPANY f"oppl/cobt•J
I
I
01NAME r20+BNUMBER 10NAME r 1 D+BNUMilE~-·
Not in aj>_eration
03 SmEET ADDRESS (P.O. So•. RFD I, ote.l 104SICCODE 12 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. So•, RFD I, otc.} r3SICCODE
' ..
05CITY r6 ST.ATEr7 ZIP CO•DE .• 14CITY r5STATEr6ZIPCODE
.. -
I
I
OSYEARSOFOPERATION I 09 NAME OF OWNER
Ill. PREVIOUS OPERATOR(S) rusr ,_, toeonrllnt: ptOV#do ontrt dlrtoronrr""" o,.,•rl PREVIOUS OPERATORS' PARENT COMPANIES trtoppllcabloJ I
01NAME r2 D+ B NUMBER tO NAME 111 D+BNUMBER .
03 smEET ADDRESS (P.o. So•. RFo•. ote.l r4SICCODE 12 STREET ADDRESS (P.O.IIOJ<. RFDI, otc.} r3SICCOOE I
05CITY r6 STATE r7 ZIP CODE t4CITY r5STATE,18ZIPCODE .. I
08 yEARS OF OPERATION 109 NAME OF OWNER DURING THIS PERIOD
01NAME r2 D+B N~MBER tO NAME 111 O+BNUMBER I
03 STREET AOORESS (P.O. So•. RFD I, ote.} r4SICCODE 12 SmEET ADDRESS (P.O. So•. RFD I, ore.} r3SICCODE
05CITY r6STATEr7 ZIP CODE 14CITY r5STATEr6ZIPCODE
08 YEARS OF OPERATION I 09 NAME OF OWNER DURING THIS PERIOD
I
I
OtNAME r2 D:B NUMBER tO NAME ·111 D+B NUMBER
03 SmEET ADDRESS(P.O. So•. RFDI, ote.} 104SICCODE t 2 SmEET ADDRESS (P.O. So•, RFD I, ore.} r3SICCODE
05CITY J06STATEr7ZIPCODE 14CITY r5STATE,18ZlPCODE
I
I
08 YEARS OF OPERATION I 09 NAME OF ~WNER DURING THIS PERIOD ..
IV. SOURCES OF INFORMATION rcnoopoclflc rotoronces. 'o.Q., ,,,,, ,,,., -•ONiot•ts. retJOttsJ I
_,.,.. . I
:
I
. I
I EPA FORM 2070-13 (7 ·81)
I
DRA
F
T
I
I '. -
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION
&EPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 STATEr2SITENUMBER •
PART 9 ·GENERATOR/TRANSPORTER INFORMATION NC D981472624
II. ON-SITE GENERATOR I·
01NAME 02 D+B NUMBER
03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. eo._ RFD I, ole.) 104SICCODE . I
I OS CITY r6STATE 07 ZIPCODE
Ill. OFF.SITE GENERATOR(S)
01NAME 02 D+B NUMBER 01NAME 02D+BNUMBER
Unknown I 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. So•. RFD I, ole.) 104SICCODE 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. Bo•, RFD I, ole.) r4SJCCODE .
OS CITY r6STATE 07 ZIP CODE OS CITY r6STATE OTZIPCODE. I
01NAME 02 D+B NUMBER 01NAME 02D+BNUMBER
03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. BoiC, RFD I, ole.) . r4SICCODE 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. Soz, RFD I, ole.) r4SJCCODE
OS CITY r6STATE OTZIPCODE OS CITY r6STATE OTZIPCODE
I
I
IV. TRANSPORTER(S)
01NAME 02 D+B NUMBER 01NAME 02D+BNUMBER
Unknown I
03 STREET ADDRESS !P.O. Soz. RFD I, ole.) I 0.4 SIC CODE 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. So•. RFD#, ole.) I 04'SJC CODE
OS CITY r6STATE 07ZIPCODE OS CITY r6STATE OTZIPCODE
'•
I
I 01 NAME 02 D+BNUMBER 01NAME 02D+BNUMBER
03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. So•. RFD 1, ole.) r4SJCCODE 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. So•. RFDII, ole.) r4SJCC0o;
OS CITY rBSTATE OTZIPCODE OS CITY r6STATE 07ZIPCODE I
I V. SOURCES OF INFORMATION tCII• ap..mc ,.,.,.ncos. •·II·· 11o1• , .... ,omp~. on.~-tsJs. ,.,.,,,
I
:
I
I .
I EPA FORM 2070·13 (7·61)
I
DRA
F
T
I
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I.IDENTIFICAnON
&EPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT ~;TATE~~~~M2~~4 PART 10 ·PAST RESPONSE ACTIVITIES
II. PAST RESPONSE ACTIVmES
I
I
01 0 A. WATER SUPPLY CLOSED 02DATE 03AGENCY
04 DESCRIPTION
01 0 B. TEMPORARY WATER SUPPLY PROVIDED 02DATE 03AGENCY I
04 DESCRIPTION .
01 0 C. PERMANENT WATER SUPPLY PROVIDED 02DATE 03AGENCY I
04 DESCRIPTION
01 0 D. SPILLED MATERIAL REMOVED 02DATE 03AGENCY
04 DESCRIPTION I
.
01 0 E. CONTAMINATED SOIL REMOVED 02DATE 03AGENCY
04 DESCRIPTION I
01 Xl}f. WASTE REPACKAGED 02 DATE 4 I 4 'H 03AGENCY IS'_KPA
04 DESCRIPTION
Waste overpacked & shipped off site for disposal I
01 ~ G. WASTE DISPOSED ELSEWHERE 02DATE ':{/ F./R 03AGENCY us;EEA
04 ESCRIPTION
Waste removed for temporary storage. I
01 0 H. ON SITE BURIAL 02DATE 03AGENCY
04 DESCRIPTION I
01 0 I. IN SITU CHEMICAL TREATMENT
04 DESCRIPTION
02DATE 03AGBpY
01 0 J. IN SITU BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT 02DATE 03AGENCY I
04 DESCRIPTION
01 0 K. IN SITU PHYSICAL TREATMENT 02DATE 03AGENCY
04 DESCRIPTION I
01 0 L ENCAPSULATION 02DATE 03AGENCY
04 DESCRIPTION I
01 0 M. EMERGENCY WASTE TREATMENT 02DATE 03AGENCY
04 DESCRIPTION . I
01 0 N. CUTOFF WALLS 02DATE 03AGENCY
04 DESCRIPTION I
01 0 0. EMERGENCY DIKING/SURFACE WATER DIVERSION 02DATE 03AGENCY
04 DESCRIPTION I
01 0 P. CUTOFF TRENCHES/SUMP 02DATE 03AGENCY
04 DESCRIPTION -
01 0 0. SUBSURFACE CUTOFF WALL 02 DATE 03AGENCY I
04 DESCRIPTION
EPA FORM 2070·13 (7 ·81 I I
I
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
.. POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION
&EPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 STATEI 02 SITE NUMBER
PART 10 ·PAST RESPONSE ACTIVITIES INC: DQRll..7?1)?l.
II PAST RESPONSE ACTIVmES tConllnuedJ
01 0 R. BARRIER WALLS CONSTRUCTED 02DATE 03AGENCY
04 DESCRIPTION .
01 0 S. CAPPING'COVERING 02DATE 03AGENCY I
04 DESCRIPTION
<
01 0 T. BULK TANKAGE REPAIRED 02DATE 03AGENCY
04 DESCRIPTION I
01 0 U.GROUTCURTAINCONSTRUCTED 02DATE 03AGENCY
04 DESCRIPTION I
01 0 V. BOTTOM SEALED 020ATE . 03AQENCY
0:4 DESCRIPTION I
01 0 W. GAS CONTROL 02DATE 03AGENCY
04 DESCRIPTION I
01 0 X. FIRE CONTROL 02DATE 03AGENCY
I 04 DESCRIPTION
01 0 Y. LEACHATE TREATMENT 02DATE 03AGENCY·
04 DESCRIPTION I 01 0 Z. AREA EVACUATED 02DATE 03AGENCY
04 DESCRIPTION
01 0 1.ACCESSTOSITERESTRICTED 02DATE 03AGENCY
04 DESCRIPTION I
01 0 2. POPULATION RELOCATED 02DATE 03AGENCY
04 DESCRIPTION . I
01 0 3. OTHER REMEDIAL ACTMTlES 02DATE 03AGENCY
04 DESCRIPTION I
I ..
I
;
I Ill. SOURCES OF INFORMATION tCito spoclfie rotoroncos. o.a .• ••••• "••· sample.,.., ..... ropor1s1
(See attached) .
Ref. 15,.16 I
I EPAFORM2070·13(7·81)
I
DRA
F
T
&EPA
II. ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE
SITE INSPECTION REPORT
~ART 11 • EN.FORCEMENT INFORMATION
01 PAST REGULATORY/ENFORCEMENT ACTlON IX YES 0 NO
02 DESCRIPTION OF FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL REGULATORY/ENFORCEMENT ACTION
I. IDENTIFICATION
01 STATE! 02 SITE NUMBER NC ID981472624
US EPA Region IV conducted a removal action at the site beginning March 9, 1987.
Drums were moved to the Burke County Landfill on Kirksey Rd. for temporary storage
on March 16-17, 1987. On receipt of sampling results, drums were overpacked on April
14-15, 1987 and shipped off site for disposal.
Ill. SOURCES OF INFORMATION (Cite specNic reterencos. o.g., stot• /lies, .. mplo onolysis, reports/
(See attached)
Ref 15.
EPA FORM 2070-13 (7·811
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX E
I SI'IE SAFElY PLAN
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DRA
F
T
I
I SITE SAFh'IY PLAN
I A. GENERAL INFORlvfl\TION
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site Name US 70 Drum Dump
Location US 70 approx. 2 miles east of the
Burkefl4cDowell County Line
Site Number NC D981472624
Date 7/7/86
Purpose of Visit __ ____;PA X SI __ ....;Other
Proposed Date of Inspection _..;...7 /:...8;;.!/....;;8;...;:;6 ________ _
Date of Briefing _7~/-:.7...:../...;;.8..;;..6 _______ _
Priority Ranking ---
Site Investigation Team
Persmmel
Pat DeRosa
l·iary Giguere
Lee Crosby
PLAN PREPARATION:
Prepared By Ma Gi uere
Low X Medium .........;____;____; ___ High
Responsibilities
sampling
sampling
observing
Approved By --..!~~¥o::e..;...R&.--.::...< ---::~::loC.l~~.l\------
B. SITE/WASTE QfARACTERISTICS
Waste Type(s) ? Liquid ? Solid ? Sludge -...:...? __ Gas
Characteristics ? Corrosive ? Ignitable Radioactive
? Volatile .....:..? __ Toxic ? Reactive Other
List Known or Suspected Hazards (pllysical,chemical biological or radioactive)
on Site and their toxicological effects. Also, if known, list chemical amounts
HAZARl>
hazards on this site are
unknown. One drum is
marked: Acetic acid.
hFFhCT(S)
Skin corrosive
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Facility Description: Size------Buildings _....;n:;;;.o;;.:n::.:e:,...._ ____ _
Disposal Methods Being Investigated surface dumping of drums
Unusual Features on Site (dike integrity, power lines, terrain etc.):
drums are stacked on an embankment, site is overgrown. Some drums are at a
precarious angle
History of the Site: site is an embankment for US Highway 70 at an entrance
to a culvert under the road. Drums are rusted, it is estimated that they have
been in place for ten to fifteen years. It is estimated that there are 20 -30
drums present.
C. HAZARD hVALUATION
The site presents unknown chemical hazards. The site has no apparent odors and
carutot be considered a confined space. The site will be sampled using full
face respirators with acid gas/OV cartridges, saranex coated tyveks, double
gloves (latex inner and PVC outer) and rubber boots. This site does contain
safety hazards. No drum will be sampled that is not easily accessible. No
climbing over or onto drums will be permitted. Caution will be exercised at
all times. HNu will be used. If readings of greater than 10 ppm above
backgrowtd are detected site will be vacated.
D. WORK PLAN INS'IRUCTION
Map or Sketch Attached? No Perimeter Identified? ~Ye....;;s;.;..:;_ __
Command Post Identified? No
Zones of Contamination Id'-en...;..t"-:i:-::f:-:-i-ed? No _....;;;.;..:;___
Personal Protective Equipment
Level of Protection A B __ _;;: ___;x~_c D ------'
Modifications full face resp. with OV/acid gas cartridges saranex coated
tyveks, rubber boots, double PVC gloves. Gloves and boots will be taped.
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Surveillance Equipment:
X H Nu
___ Explosimeter
___ TLD
Detector Tubes and Pumps
02 .Meter
(Radiation Monitor)
Decontamination Procedures
Level A ---
Level B ---
X Level C
___ Level D
Segregated equipment drop, boot cover and glove wash, boot
cover and glove rinse, tape removal, suit and hard hat
removal, SCBA backpack removal, inner glove wash, inner
glove removal, inner clothing removal, field wash, redress
Segregated equipment drop, boot cover and glove wash,boot
cover and glove rinse, tape removal. boot cover removal
outer glove removal, suit/safety removal, SCBA backpack
removal, inner glove wash, inner glove rinse, facepiece
removal, inner glove removal, inner clothing removal, field
wash, redress.
Segregated equipment drop, boot cover and glove wash, boot
cover and glove rinse, tape removal, boot cover removal,
outer glove removal,suit/safety boot wash, suit/safety boot
rinse (Canister or Mask Change), safety boot removal, splash
suit removal, inner glove wash, inner glove rinse, facepiece
removal, inner glove removal, inner clothing removal. field
wash redress.
Segregated equipment drop. boot and glove wash, boot and
glove rinse.
Nodifications trash will be left on site.
Work Schedule/ Limitations private well, background soil, waste concentrate
samples
EMERGENCY PRECAUTIONS
Acute Exposure Symptoms
eyes
skin
inhalation
ingestion
First Aid
irrigate immediately
soap and water wash
fresh air & artificial resp.
medical attention
DRA
F
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
Hospital (Address and Phone Number)
Grace Hospital [phone]
2201 S. Sterling Street, Morganton, NC
Emergency Transportation Systems (Phone Numbers)
Fire use 911
Ambulance _u=s::.:e:.....:;.9.=.11=--------------
Rescue Squad _....;u:;;s:..::e;,._;;_91~1::....-_________ _
Emergency Route to Hospital Take US 70 west approx •• 2 miles, take a left,
get on 40 east to Morganton, take Hwr· 18 east, after getting onto Hwy. 18,
hospital will be on the right in about on block.
PREVAILING WEATHER CONDITIONS AND FORECAST sunny with a high in the upper
90s or low lOOs.
EQUIPMENT CHECKLIST
X Air purifying respirator X First Aid Kit
X Cartridges for respirator X 3 gal. Distilled H20
3M 8710 Respirator X Personal Protective
02 Indicator Clothing
---=~-Detector Tube & Pump X Boots or Boot Covers
X Eye Wash Unit X Coveralls (tyvek) x H Nu X Eye Protection
X pH Meter Hard Hat
Explosimeter X Decontamination
---Radioactive Monitor l-laterials.
ASHh\TILLE
704-255-4490
CHARLOTTE
704-379-5827
DURHAM
1-800-672-1697
GREENSBORO
919-379-4105
1-800-722-2222
Poison Control Center -State Coordinator
Duke University Medical Center
Telephone: [phone]
Box 3024
Durham, NC 27710
Western NC Poison
Control Center
Memorial Mission Hosp.
509 Biltmore Ave. 28801
Mercy Hospital
2001 Vail Ave, 28207
HENDERSONVILLE
704-693-6522
Ext. 555, 556
HICKORY
704-322-6649
Duke Univ Medical Center JACKSONVILLE
Box 3007, 27710 919-577-2555
Moses Cone Hospital WILMINGTON
1200 N. Elm St, 27420 919-343-7046
~largaret R. Pardee
Memorial Hospital
Fleming St., 28739
Catawba Mem. Hosp.
Fairgrove Chur. Rd 28601
Onslow Mem. Hospital
Western Blvd. 28540
New Hanover Mem. Hospital
2131 S. 17th St, 28401
DRA
F
T
Appendix D
Professional Qualifications
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project # 1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina
DRA
F
T

Mrs. Anya Chase
Project Engineer
Employed at EBI since 2020, in the industry since 2016
B.S.: Integrated Studies with focuses in Natural Resource Management/Policy,
Professional Credentials:

Since 2016, Mrs. Anya Chase, Project Engineer, has gained extensive experience Due Diligence and Construction
Monitoring of commercial and residential properties and has conducted various assessments including performing
Environmental Site Assessments (ESA) and Property Condition Assessments (PCA) within the environmental and
engineering consulting industry in accordance with the ASTM Standard of Practice. Mrs. Chase has successfully
completed various project assignments including property transaction due diligence site assessments, property
condition engineering evaluations, and environmental site assessments at a large range of commercial and industrial
property types, as well as multi-family and similar work for financial institutions. Additional environmental experience
includes Phase II Subsurface Investigations, APE-VE inspections/reports, Loan Checks, and various projects within the
telecommunications field working with solar, cell towers, and water towers.
Relevant project experience:
ESAs: Mrs. Chase has conducted hundreds of ASTM Phase I Environmental Site Assessments for various property
types across the eastern and southern United States, including researching property environmental and regulatory
history via review of environmental databases and local records; ensuring regulatory compliance with state and
federal regulations; sampling for lead and radon; and employee training. The property types include industrial,
commercial, residential, agricultural, and vacant properties, as well as those undergoing construction and remediation.
Mrs. Chase has experience in ensuring efficient coordination with other environmental and engineering professionals
to carry out the assessments, reports, and recommendations effectively.

Phase IIs: Mrs. Chase has five years of conducting Phase II Site Investigations throughout the eastern United States,
aiding in the determination of environmental risks and liabilities at properties for commercial real estate transactions.
Duties included within the subsurface investigations included the identification of the source of contamination and
tracing the extent via the collection and classification of soil samples; installation and sampling of groundwater
monitoring wells; utilization of a Photo Ionization Detector; overseeing of underground storage tank (UST) removals;
and providing detailed summaries of findings.

Property Condition Assessments: Mrs. Chase has been involved in the real estate services consulting industry
conducting PCA inspections since 2016. Assessments include conducting surveys and structural assessments to
assess the structural condition and expected useful life of buildings, their structural systems, roofs, facades, interior
finishes, electrical, HVAC, plumbing, mechanical systems, and fire and life safety at a large range of commercial
property types, including multi-family, and similar work for financial institutions. Mrs. Chase conducts Freddie Mac
and Fannie Mae Property Condition Assessments in the southeast region where she resides.

DRA
F
T

Jon Hickey
Program Manager
Employed with EBI since 2010; over 15 years of experience
BS Environmental Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered Intern Engineer in the State of New York

-Based Paint Inspector in the State of New York

Jon Hickey is a program manager with over 15 years of experience specializing in Environmental Site Assessments and
Property Condition Assessments for the real estate and telecommunications industries. Jon has successfully completed
hundreds of project assignments pertaining to property transaction due diligence site assessments, including transaction
screens, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, peer report reviews and Property Condition Assessments. In addition, he
has extensive experience overseeing subsurface investigations, remediation projects and asbestos and lead-based paint
surveys. At EBI, he currently performs technical reviews of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment reports and peer reports
and provides project coordination and portfolio management. He works closely with lending institutions, corporate
environmental officers, legal counsel and real estate brokers to develop strategies for managing properties with
environmental concern.
Relevant project experience:
Environmental Site Assessments, Various Locations
Jon has over 15 years of experience conducting Environmental Site Assessments for commercial, industrial and multifamily
residential properties located nationwide and in Canada. He has extensive experience conducting Environmental Site
Assessments for real estate and telecommunications sites located throughout the New York metropolitan area. These
assessments were performed to evaluate current and historic site conditions, potential off-site liabilities, environmental
control systems, and site remediation costs to advise prospective buyers, operators and owners of potential and existing
environmental concerns.
In addition to environmental assessments, he has performed hundreds of Property Condition Assessments for various
property owners and financial institutions for portfolios and individual projects in the Northeast and Canada. Projects
completed ranged in size and complexity from small single-family residences and individual businesses to multi-story
apartment buildings and multi-building shopping centers.
He has also conducted various stages of technical investigations, including subsurface investigations, remediation projects,
environmental compliance audits and hazardous materials surveys. These investigations have included the management,
installation and oversight of soil borings, soil vapor points and groundwater monitoring wells utilizing various sampling
techniques such as direct-push, auger and air rotary and the sampling of environmental media. Property types have ranged
from heavily industrialized to residential properties.
DRA
F
T
Appendix E
Regulatory Database Report
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project # 1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina
DRA
F
T
FORM-LBC-GON
®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
2353 U.S. 70
2353 U.S. 70
Morganton, NC 28655
Inquiry Number: 07396101.2r
July 21, 2023
DRA
F
T
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary 11
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5
Physical Setting Source Map A-9
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-11
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, LLC. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist
from other sources. This Report is provided on an "AS IS", "AS AVAILABLE" basis. NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED IS MADE
WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES,
AFFILIATES AND THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT,
INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING ACCURACY, QUALITY, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS,
COMPREHENSIVENESS, SUITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT,
MISAPPROPRIATION, OR OTHERWISE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
RESOURCES, LLC OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES OR THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR ANY DIRECT,
INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES OF ANY TYPE OR KIND (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED
TO LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF USE, OR LOSS OF DATA) INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT. Any analyses, estimates,
ratings, environmental risk levels, or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property.
Only an assessment performed by a qualified environmental professional can provide findings, opinions or conclusions regarding the
environmental risk or conditions in, on or at any property.
Copyright 2023 by Environmental Data Resources, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any
report or map of Environmental Data Resources, LLC, or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, LLC or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC07396101.2r Page 1
DRA
F
T
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC07396101.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E1527 - 21), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E2247 - 16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E1528 - 22) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
2353 U.S. 70
MORGANTON, NC 28655
COORDINATES
35.6968190 - 35˚ 41’ 48.54’’Latitude (North):
81.8381900 - 81˚ 50’ 17.48’’Longitude (West):
Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator:
424165.2UTM X (Meters):
3950446.2UTM Y (Meters):
1338 ft. above sea levelElevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
13839780 GLEN ALPINE, NCTarget Property Map:
2019Version Date:
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
20200921Portions of Photo from:
USDASource:
DRA
F
T
07396101.2r Page 2
3 PRESNELL GEN. MERCH. 2668 US 70 WEST IMD Lower 2233, 0.423, NW
2 US 70 DRUM DUMP US 70 SHWS Lower 228, 0.043, North
Reg US 70 DRUM DUMP NC HSDS Same 1 ft.
1 2353 WEST US HIGHWAY 2353 WEST US HIGHWAY US CDL TP
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
2353 U.S. 70
MORGANTON, NC 28655
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS
DRA
F
T
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC07396101.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this
property see page 8 of the attached EDR Radius Map report:
EPA IDDatabase(s)Site
2353 WEST US HIGHWAY
2353 WEST US HIGHWAY
MORGANTON, NC
N/AUS CDL
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
DRA
F
T
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC07396101.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF List of Solid Waste Facilities
DEBRIS Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
OLI Old Landfill Inventory
LCID Land-Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LUST Regional UST Database
LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST State Trust Fund Database
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST AST Database
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCP Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY Recycling Center Listing
DRA
F
T
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC07396101.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
HIST LF Solid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
ODI Open Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS Spills Incident Listing
SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80 SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD Records Of Decision
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES Mines Master Index File
DRA
F
T
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC07396101.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
PFAS NPL Superfund Sites with PFAS Detections Information
PFAS FEDERAL SITES Federal Sites PFAS Information
PFAS TSCA PFAS Manufacture and Imports Information
PFAS RCRA MANIFEST PFAS Transfers Identified In the RCRA Database Listing
PFAS ATSDR PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing
PFAS WQP Ambient Environmental Sampling for PFAS
PFAS NPDES Clean Water Act Discharge Monitoring Information
PFAS ECHO Facilities in Industries that May Be Handling PFAS Listing
PFAS ECHO FIRE TRAINING Facilities in Industries that May Be Handling PFAS Listing
PFAS PART 139 AIRPORT All Certified Part 139 Airports PFAS Information Listing
AQUEOUS FOAM NRC Aqueous Foam Related Incidents Listing
PFAS PFAS Contamination Site Listing
AIRS Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS ASBESTOS
COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP Animal Operation Permits Listing
PFAS TRIS List of PFAS Added to the TRI
MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System
PCSRP Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
CCB Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
SEPT HAULERS Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.
DRA
F
T
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC07396101.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites
NC HSDS: The Hazardous Substance Disposal Sites list contains locations of uncontrolled and
unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file contains sites on the national priority list as well as the state
priority list. The data source is the North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis.
A review of the NC HSDS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/09/2011 has revealed that there is 1
NC HSDS site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
US 70 DRUM DUMP 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 0 8
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
SHWS: The State Hazardous Waste Sites records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state
funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by
potentially responsible parties. The data come from the Department of Environment & Natural Resources’
Inactive Hazardous Sites Program.
A review of the SHWS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/28/2023 has revealed that there is 1 SHWS
site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
US 70 DRUM DUMP US 70 N 0 - 1/8 (0.043 mi.) 2 8
Facility Id: NCD981472624
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Records of Emergency Release Reports
IMD: Incident Management Database.
A review of the IMD list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/28/2023 has revealed that there is 1 IMD
DRA
F
T
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC07396101.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8
site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
PRESNELL GEN. MERCH. 2668 US 70 WEST NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.423 mi.) 3 8
Facility Id: 11182
DRA
F
T
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC07396101.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 6 records.
Site Name Database(s)____________ ____________
HENREDON FURNITURE CO. PRP
MERCER TRANSPORTATION - DIESEL SPI LAST
ASKAR TRUCK SPILL LAST
VACANT CONVENIENCE LUST
COLONEL’S PANTRY LUST TRUST, INST CONTROL
2035 U.S. 70 W US CDL
DRA
F
T
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
0 8080
1080
1
2
00
1120
1320
1
280
1240
1
160
12
40
1 280
1
2
8
0
1
3
2
0
1280
1 280
1160
1320
12801320
1240
1320
1280
1280
1 2 8 0
1240
13 6 0
1360
1320 1360
1 360
1320
1320
1
3
2
0
1320
1
320
1320
1320
1320
13
20
1320
1160
1 280
1 3201200
13201320
1320
1320
1080
10 8 01080
1320
1320
1
2
8
0
1280
1
3
20
1
2
0
0
1320
12 40
1240
1 2
12
40
1 2 4 0
1240
1 240
1 320
1 2 8 0
1280
1 2 80
1280
1280
1
2
8
0
1280
1280
1280
12 80
1280
1280
1 2 8 0
128 0
1 280
1280
1280
1
2
8
0
1280
1280
1160
0
1120
1120
11
112 0
1120
1 1 20
1120
1120
1120
11
201
1
2
0
1
1
6
0
1 1 6 0
1
160
1160
1160
1160
1160
1
1
60
116
0
1160
116 0
1 1 6 0
1160
1160
11 6 0
1160
1
160
1
2
4
0
1240
1
2
4
0
1240
1240
1240
1240
1
2
4
0
1240
1240
1
2
4
0
1240
1240
1240
1
2
40
1
2
4
0
1240
1 2 4 0
1240
1240
1240
1240
1240
1240
1240
1 2 00
1
2
0
0
1200
1200
12001
200
1 200
1
2
0
0
1200
1 2 0 0
1200
12
0
0
1200
1200
1 2 0 0
120 0
1
2
0
0
1200
1200
1
2
00
1200
1200
1200
12
0
0
1 2 0 0
1 2 0 0
DRA
F
T
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
1280
1360
1360
1360
1360
1320
1320
1360
1320
13
2
0
1320
13
2
0
13
2
0
1320
1
12
1280
12
8
0
1280
128
0
124
0
1240
DRA
F
T
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL LIENS
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL
Lists of Federal sites subject to
CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities
undergoing Corrective Action
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-VSQG
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROLS
Federal ERNS list
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS
Lists of state- and tribal
(Superfund) equivalent sites
1 NR 0 0 0 1 1.000NC HSDS
Lists of state- and tribal
hazardous waste facilities
1 NR 0 0 0 1 1.000SHWS
Lists of state and tribal landfills
and solid waste disposal facilities
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF
TC07396101.2r Page 4
DRA
F
T
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500OLI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LCID
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LAST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST TRUST
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INST CONTROL
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500HIST LF
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL
1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1US CDL
Local Land Records
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2
Records of Emergency Release Reports
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS
TC07396101.2r Page 5
DRA
F
T
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS
1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500IMD
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 90
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 80
Other Ascertainable Records
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250ABANDONED MINES
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFINDS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOCKET HWC
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPECHO
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS NPL
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS FEDERAL SITES
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS TSCA
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS RCRA MANIFEST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS ATSDR
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS WQP
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS NPDES
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS ECHO
TC07396101.2r Page 6
DRA
F
T
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS ECHO FIRE TRAINING
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS PART 139 AIRPORT
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AQUEOUS FOAM NRC
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPAIRS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPASBESTOS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFinancial Assurance
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPDES
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPAOP
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS TRIS
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MINES MRDS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PCSRP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CCB
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSEPT HAULERS
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA HWS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LF
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LUST
4 0 0 1 0 2 1- Totals --
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC07396101.2r Page 7
DRA
F
T
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
09/20/2007Seizure Date:
NCState:
MORGANTONCity:
2353 WEST US HIGHWAY 70 5Address:
US CDL:
Actual:
1338 ft.

Property MORGANTON, NC
Target 2353 WEST US HIGHWAY 70 5 N/A
1 US CDL2353 WEST US HIGHWAY 70 5 1012203394
8636.07296094Area of feature in internal units squared:
362.571976247Length of feature in internal units:
360Sites designated as superfund cleanup sites:
720943.3125Y-value coordinate in feet:
1157487.25X-value coordinate in feet:
362.57196044Total perimeter in coverage units:
8636.07226562Total area in coverage units:
Not reportedSuperfun Number:
1Site Type:
Not reportedCity:
Not reportedAddress:
US 70 DRUM DUMPName:
HSDS:
1 ft.
< 1/8
, NC
Region N/A
HSDS NC HSDSUS 70 DRUM DUMP S102442477
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
ON SCREEN PLACEMENT ON GEOREFERENCED MAPGeolocation Method:
35.69905 / -81.83795Lat/Longitude:
NCD981472624EPAID:
MORGANTON, NCCity,State,Zip:
US 70Address:
US 70 DRUM DUMPName:
SHWS:
228 ft.
0.043 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
1306 ft.

< 1/8 MORGANTON, NC
North US 70 N/A
2 SHWSUS 70 DRUM DUMP 1000141468
MARION, NCCity,State,Zip:
2668 US 70 WESTAddress:
PRESNELL GEN. MERCH.-1000 GALName:
11182Facility ID:
IMD:
2233 ft.
0.423 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
1296 ft.

1/4-1/2 MARION, NC
NW 2668 US 70 WEST N/A
3 IMDPRESNELL GEN. MERCH.-1000 GAL S105892870
TC07396101.2r Page 8
DRA
F
T
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedRBCA GW:
Not reportedRBCA GW Codes:
Not reportedRecord Status:
Not reportedDate Cleanup Initiated:
Not reportedDate Land Use Restriction Filed:
Not reportedMTBE in Groundwater Y/N/U Yes, No or Unknown:
Not reportedFacility Phone Number:
Not reportedMTBE in Well Y/N/U Yes, No or Unknown:
Not reportedNumber of Supply Wells Located on Property:
Not reportedExtent of Contamination:
Not reportedDate Case Closed:
Not reportedDate Close Review Requested From RP or Owner:
Not reportedRBCA:
Not reportedCorrective Action Plan Selected - up to 5:
Not reportedUse of Land, Industrial:
-82.11055555Longitude:
35.67222222Latitude:
Not reportedIntermediate Condition Present:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
Not reported7.5 Min Quad:
Not reportedInitial reported risk of incident (never changes):
Not reportedSamples Include:
Not reportedSampled By:
Not reportedCurrent Risk Condition:
FacilityLocation:
Not reportedSite Priority:
0Num Affected:
Not reportedPhase 1 or Phase 2:
Not reportedNotice of Violation:
Not reportedWells Affected:
Not reportedNotice of Regulatory Requirement:
Not reportedPriority Update:
Not reportedWhether Tank is Regulated:
Not reportedSite Priority:
Not reportedWhether Tank is Commercial or Non Commercial:
Not reportedDate Incident Reported:
Not reportedPetroleum Type:
1Location:
GASOLINE/DIESELType:
Leak-undergroundSource:
Not reportedResponsible Party County:
CommercialOperation Type:
PrivateOwnership:
Not reportedResponsible Party City,State,Zip:
Not reportedResponsible Party Mailing Address:
6Operation:
Not reportedResponsible Party Contact Name:
4Ownership:
Not reportedResponsible Party/Company Name:
Not reportedRegional Office:
Not reportedInitials of UST Regional Contact:
Not reportedIncident ID:
Not reportedUST ID:
Not reportedOperator:
RELEASE FOUND DURING REMOVAL OF UST.Incident Desc:
11/3/1993Submit Date:
7/2/1993Date Occurred:
PRESNELL GEN. MERCH.-1000 GAL (Continued)S105892870
TC07396101.2r Page 9
DRA
F
T
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
1993-11-03 00:00:00Close-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Sighned:
Not reportedCorrective Action Planned:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
Not reportedNORR Issued:
Not reportedNOV Issued:
COIncident Phase:
1993-12-22 00:00:00Last Modified:
11182Facility ID:
Status:
DWMAgency:
NODGPS:
82.1105555555556Longitude Decimal:
35.6722222222222Latitude Decimal:
820638Longitude Number:
354020Latitude Number:
Not reportedWells Contam:
JCADem Contact:
Not reportedPriority Code:
LRisk Site:
4Setting:
Not reportedQty Recovered 1:
Not reportedQty Lost 1:
GASOLINEMaterial:
Not reportedOperator County:
Not reportedOperator City,State,Zip:
Not reportedOperator Address:
Not reportedOwner Company:
Not reportedContact Phone:
YesSoil Contam:
No Groundwater Contamination detectedGW Contam:
Not reportedComments:
Not reportedRP Landowner?:
Not reportedRP Operator?:
Not reportedRP Owner?:
Not reportedReference Number for Media Disk for Archived Record:
Not reportedPollutant Type Present:
PRESNELL GEN. MERCH.-1000 GAL (Continued) S105892870
TC07396101.2r Page 10
DRA
F
T
ORPHAN SUMMARY
TC07396101.2r Page 11
DRA
F
T
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 04/26/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2023
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:
EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 04/26/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2023
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
TC07396101.2r Page GR-1
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 04/26/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2023
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 03/26/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2023
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/23/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 04/26/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2023
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC07396101.2r Page GR-2
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 04/26/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2023
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 03/06/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2023
Number of Days to Update: 11
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 03/06/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2023
Number of Days to Update: 11
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 03/06/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2023
Number of Days to Update: 11
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC07396101.2r Page GR-3
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 03/06/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2023
Number of Days to Update: 11
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate
less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 03/06/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2023
Number of Days to Update: 11
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 02/08/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2023
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/21/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 02/20/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/21/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2023
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 02/20/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/21/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2023
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC07396101.2r Page GR-4
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2023
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/08/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2023
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 12/15/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/19/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/15/2023
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information. (Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
sites).
Date of Government Version: 03/22/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2023
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC07396101.2r Page GR-5
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
DEBRIS: Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
NCDEQ Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Temporary Disaster Debris Staging Site (TDDSS) Locations
which are available to be activated in a disaster or emergency.. Disaster Debris Sites can only be used for temporary
disaster debris storage if the site’s responsible party activates the site for use by notifying the NCDEQ DWM
Solid Waste Section staff during an emergency
Date of Government Version: 12/09/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/09/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2023
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LCID: Land-Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
A list all of the Land-Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notification facilities (under 2 acres in
size) in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2022
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 04/28/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/19/2023
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/14/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version: 04/28/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2023
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/14/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 04/25/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC07396101.2r Page GR-6
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 04/19/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 04/26/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 04/19/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 04/03/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2023
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC07396101.2r Page GR-7
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 03/08/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2023
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 04/21/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2023
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/14/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version: 03/10/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2023
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2023
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/25/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC07396101.2r Page GR-8
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/19/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 04/26/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/08/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2023
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC07396101.2r Page GR-9
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/08/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2023
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 142
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/29/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/13/2023
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/23/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/19/2023
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/08/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2023
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
TC07396101.2r Page GR-10
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007
Number of Days to Update: 17
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version: 01/31/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/29/2022
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/06/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/06/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009
Number of Days to Update: 137
Source: EPA, Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015
Number of Days to Update: 176
Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/07/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
TC07396101.2r Page GR-11
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version: 05/22/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/23/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2023
Number of Days to Update: 48
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2023
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 05/22/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/23/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2023
Number of Days to Update: 48
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Local Land Records
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 04/26/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2023
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 03/19/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2023
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills, hazardous material releases, sanitary sewer overflows, wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets, citizen complaints, and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
Date of Government Version: 12/22/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2023
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
TC07396101.2r Page GR-12
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
Date of Government Version: 04/28/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/19/2023
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/14/2023
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 03/06/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2023
Number of Days to Update: 11
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 05/08/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/16/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2023
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/28/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 06/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2022
Number of Days to Update: 239
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/10/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC07396101.2r Page GR-13
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019
Number of Days to Update: 574
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 07/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2023
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/11/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/21/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version: 03/13/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2023
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/01/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/14/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/14/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC07396101.2r Page GR-14
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2023
Number of Days to Update: 283
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/16/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2023
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2023
Number of Days to Update: 75
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/19/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/28/2023
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/18/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2023
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 04/26/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2023
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RMP: Risk Management Plans
TC07396101.2r Page GR-15
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 04/26/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2023
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/14/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC07396101.2r Page GR-16
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 03/15/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2023
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2023
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019
Number of Days to Update: 251
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 96
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/14/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
TC07396101.2r Page GR-17
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/07/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 03/31/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2023
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Telephone: Varies
Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2023
Number of Days to Update: 11
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
TC07396101.2r Page GR-18
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 546
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.
Date of Government Version: 03/03/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2023
Number of Days to Update: 98
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/26/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/14/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/28/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 04/26/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2023
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
TC07396101.2r Page GR-19
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data
Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration.
Date of Government Version: 04/03/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 02/02/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2023
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2023
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron
ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such
as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 01/07/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2023
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory
contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
TC07396101.2r Page GR-20
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
Date of Government Version: 03/17/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2023
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Department of Interior
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 02/02/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2023
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/17/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 11/09/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2023
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Defense
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 03/25/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2023
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels
Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 05/15/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/17/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2023
Number of Days to Update: 54
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/17/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/28/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PFAS NPL: Superfund Sites with PFAS Detections Information
EPA’s Office of Land and Emergency Management and EPA Regional Offices maintain data describing what is known
about site investigations, contamination, and remedial actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) where PFAS is present in the environment.
TC07396101.2r Page GR-21
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
Date of Government Version: 06/07/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2023
Number of Days to Update: 1
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS FEDERAL SITES: Federal Sites PFAS Information
Several federal entities, such as the federal Superfund program, Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and
Space Administration, Department of Transportation, and Department of Energy provided information for sites with
known or suspected detections at federal facilities.
Date of Government Version: 03/30/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2023
Number of Days to Update: 8
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS TSCA: PFAS Manufacture and Imports Information
EPA issued the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) Rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and requires
chemical manufacturers and facilities that manufacture or import chemical substances to report data to EPA. EPA
publishes non-confidential business information (non-CBI) and includes descriptive information about each site,
corporate parent, production volume, other manufacturing information, and processing and use information.
Date of Government Version: 03/30/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2023
Number of Days to Update: 71
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS RCRA MANIFEST: PFAS Transfers Identified In the RCRA Database Listing
To work around the lack of PFAS waste codes in the RCRA database, EPA developed the PFAS Transfers dataset by
mining e-Manifest records containing at least one of these common PFAS keywords: PFAS, PFOA, PFOS, PERFL, AFFF,
GENX, GEN-X (plus the VT waste codes). These keywords were searched for in the following text fields: Manifest
handling instructions (MANIFEST_HANDLING_INSTR), Non-hazardous waste description (NON_HAZ_WASTE_DESCRIPTION),
DOT printed information (DOT_PRINTED_INFORMATION), Waste line handling instructions (WASTE_LINE_HANDLING_INSTR),
Waste residue comments (WASTE_RESIDUE_COMMENTS).
Date of Government Version: 03/30/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2023
Number of Days to Update: 33
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS ATSDR: PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing
PFAS contamination site locations from the Department of Health & Human Services, Center for Disease Control &
Prevention. ATSDR is involved at a number of PFAS-related sites, either directly or through assisting state and
federal partners. As of now, most sites are related to drinking water contamination connected with PFAS production
facilities or fire training areas where aqueous film-forming firefighting foam (AFFF) was regularly used.
Date of Government Version: 06/24/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 601
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/06/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS WQP: Ambient Environmental Sampling for PFAS
The Water Quality Portal (WQP) is a part of a modernized repository storing ambient sampling data for all environmental
media and tissue samples. A wide range of federal, state, tribal and local governments, academic and non-governmental
organizations and individuals submit project details and sampling results to this public repository. The information
is commonly used for research and assessments of environmental quality.
TC07396101.2r Page GR-22
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
Date of Government Version: 03/30/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2023
Number of Days to Update: 33
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS NPDES: Clean Water Act Discharge Monitoring Information
Any discharger of pollutants to waters of the United States from a point source must have a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The process for obtaining limits involves the regulated entity
(permittee) disclosing releases in a NPDES permit application and the permitting authority (typically the state
but sometimes EPA) deciding whether to require monitoring or monitoring with limits. Caveats and Limitations:
Less than half of states have required PFAS monitoring for at least one of their permittees and fewer states have
established PFAS effluent limits for permittees. New rulemakings have been initiated that may increase the number
of facilities monitoring for PFAS in the future.
Date of Government Version: 03/30/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2023
Number of Days to Update: 8
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS ECHO: Facilities in Industries that May Be Handling PFAS Listing
Regulators and the public have expressed interest in knowing which regulated entities may be using PFAS. EPA has
developed a dataset from various sources that show which industries may be handling PFAS. Approximately 120,000
facilities subject to federal environmental programs have operated or currently operate in industry sectors with
processes that may involve handling and/or release of PFAS.
Date of Government Version: 03/30/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2023
Number of Days to Update: 4
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS ECHO FIRE TRAINING: Facilities in Industries that May Be Handling PFAS Listing
A list of fire training sites was added to the Industry Sectors dataset using a keyword search on the permitted
facilitys name to identify sites where fire-fighting foam may have been used in training exercises. Additionally,
you may view an example spreadsheet of the subset of fire training facility data, as well as the keywords used
in selecting or deselecting a facility for the subset. as well as the keywords used in selecting or deselecting
a facility for the subset. These keywords were tested to maximize accuracy in selecting facilities that may use
fire-fighting foam in training exercises, however, due to the lack of a required reporting field in the data systems
for designating fire training sites, this methodology may not identify all fire training sites or may potentially
misidentify them.
Date of Government Version: 03/30/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2023
Number of Days to Update: 4
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS PART 139 AIRPORT: All Certified Part 139 Airports PFAS Information Listing
Since July 1, 2006, all certified part 139 airports are required to have fire-fighting foam onsite that meet military
specifications (MIL-F-24385) (14 CFR 139.317). To date, these military specification fire-fighting foams are
fluorinated and have been historically used for training and extinguishing. The 2018 FAA Reauthorization Act has
a provision stating that no later than October 2021, FAA shall not require the use of fluorinated AFFF. This provision
does not prohibit the use of fluorinated AFFF at Part 139 civilian airports; it only prohibits FAA from mandating
its use. The Federal Aviation Administration?s document AC 150/5210-6D - Aircraft Fire Extinguishing Agents provides
guidance on Aircraft Fire Extinguishing Agents, which includes Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF).
TC07396101.2r Page GR-23
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
Date of Government Version: 03/30/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2023
Number of Days to Update: 4
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
AQUEOUS FOAM NRC: Aqueous Foam Related Incidents Listing
The National Response Center (NRC) serves as an emergency call center that fields initial reports for pollution
and railroad incidents and forwards that information to appropriate federal/state agencies for response. The spreadsheets
posted to the NRC website contain initial incident data that has not been validated or investigated by a federal/state
response agency. Response center calls from 1990 to the most recent complete calendar year where there was indication
of Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) usage are included in this dataset. NRC calls may reference AFFF usage in
the ?Material Involved? or ?Incident Description? fields.
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2023
Number of Days to Update: 5
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS: PFAS Contamination Site Listing
List of PFAS facilities
Date of Government Version: 05/18/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/14/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
AIRS: Air Quality Permit Listing
A listing of facilities with air quality permits.
Date of Government Version: 03/05/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/08/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2023
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ASBESTOS: ASBESTOS
Asbestos notification sites
Date of Government Version: 01/31/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2023
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage,
transportation, use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version: 12/15/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/19/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/15/2023
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
TC07396101.2r Page GR-24
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/16/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 04/21/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2023
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/14/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012
Number of Days to Update: 23
Source: Department of Environmental & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/17/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/22/2023
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits.
Date of Government Version: 12/01/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/15/2023
Number of Days to Update: 21
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/07/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 02/22/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2022
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AOP: Animal Operation Permits Listing
This listing includes animal operations that are required to be permitted by the state.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2020
Number of Days to Update: 1
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC07396101.2r Page GR-25
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
CCB: Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
These are not permitted Coal Ash landfills A list all of the now closed Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) in North
Carolina, in point data form. The purpose is to provide the public and other government entities a visual overview
of coal ash structural fills throughout the state and increase public awareness of their current locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS TRIS: List of PFAS Added to the TRI
Section 7321 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (NDAA) immediately added certain
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to the list of chemicals covered by the Toxics Release Inventory
(TRI) under Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) and provided a framework
for additional PFAS to be added to TRI on an annual basis.
Date of Government Version: 06/07/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2023
Number of Days to Update: 1
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCSRP: Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
To treat petroleum-contaminated soil in order to protect North Carolinaa??s environment and the health of the
citizens of North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 08/18/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2022
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEPT HAULERS: Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
This list of all active and permitted Septage Land Application Site (SLAS) and Septage Detention and Treatment
Facility (SDTF) sites in North Carolina. The purpose of this map is to provide the public and government entities
a visual overview of the businesses that manage septage and septage facilities throughout the state.
Date of Government Version: 01/17/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/18/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/06/2023
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES
facilities.
Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: EPA, Office of Water
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC07396101.2r Page GR-26
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
Date of Government Version: 08/23/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/28/2023
Number of Days to Update: 98
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC07396101.2r Page GR-27
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013
Number of Days to Update: 176
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014
Number of Days to Update: 196
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013
Number of Days to Update: 172
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 11/16/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/16/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/06/2023
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/11/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/21/2023
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
TC07396101.2r Page GR-28
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/07/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019
Number of Days to Update: 53
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2023
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/10/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/28/2023
Data Release Frequency: Annually
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2023
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: Endeavor Business Media
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty
Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information
is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its
fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business
Media.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Endeavor Business Media
This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best
effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals.
TC07396101.2r Page GR-29
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005, 2010 and 2015 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC07396101.2r Page GR-30
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRA
F
T
TC07396101.2r Page A-1
geologic strata.
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
2019Version Date:
13839780 GLEN ALPINE, NCTarget Property Map:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
1338 ft. above sea levelElevation:
3950446.2UTM Y (Meters):
424165.2UTM X (Meters):
Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator:
81.83819 - 81˚ 50’ 17.48’’Longitude (West):
35.696819 - 35˚ 41’ 48.55’’Latitude (North):
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
MORGANTON, NC 28655
2353 U.S. 70
2353 U.S. 70
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM®
DRA
F
T
TC07396101.2r Page A-2
should be field verified.
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
TP
TP
0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 1338 ft.
North South
West East
11
9
4
12
0
0
12
3
7
13
2
2
13
2
1
13
2
0
13
2
0
13
2
1
13
2
5
13
3
8
13
2
0
13
2
5
12
5
9
12
0
1
11
9
1
12
4
4
11
5
9
11
9
4
12
2
7
12
4
6
13
2
2
12
8
6
13
6
4
12
5
0
12
8
8
12
8
8
13
4
9
13
6
0
13
3
8
12
9
2
12
7
9
12
8
3
12
5
1
12
3
3
12
0
7
11
9
6
12
4
0
12
6
5
General ENEGeneral Topographic Gradient:
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
DRA
F
T
TC07396101.2r Page A-3
Not Reported
GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION
GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapGLEN ALPINE
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Electronic
Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property
FEMA FIRM Flood data3710174000K
FEMA FIRM Flood data3710176000J
FEMA FIRM Flood data3710176200J
Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data3710175200K
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
and bodies of water).
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
DRA
F
T
TC07396101.2r Page A-4
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Metamorphic RocksCategory:PaleozoicEra:
MississippianSystem:
migmatiteSeries:
mm3Code: (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils.
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
DRA
F
T
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
3
2 3
1
2
4
4
0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles
DRA
F
T
TC07396101.2r Page A-6

Well drainedSoil Drainage Class:
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group:
sandy clay loamSoil Surface Texture:
FairviewSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 2
Min: 3.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 4
Max: 14 Not reportedNot reportedloam78 inches38 inches 4
Min: 3.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 4
Max: 14 Not reportedNot reportedclay loam38 inches25 inches 3
Min: 3.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 4
Max: 14 Not reportedNot reportedclay25 inches 7 inches 2
Min: 3.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 4
Max: 14 Not reportedNot reportedsandy clay loam 7 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)

> 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Well drainedSoil Drainage Class:
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group:
sandy clay loamSoil Surface Texture:
FairviewSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 1
in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data.
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
DRA
F
T
TC07396101.2r Page A-7
Min: 3.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 4
Max: 14 Not reportedNot reportedsandy clay loam 7 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)

> 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Well drainedSoil Drainage Class:
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group:
sandy clay loamSoil Surface Texture:
FairviewSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 3
Min: 3.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 4
Max: 14 Not reportedNot reportedloam78 inches38 inches 4
Min: 3.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 4
Max: 14 Not reportedNot reportedclay loam38 inches25 inches 3
Min: 3.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 4
Max: 14 Not reportedNot reportedclay25 inches 7 inches 2
Min: 3.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 4
Max: 14 Not reportedNot reportedsandy clay loam 7 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)

> 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Not hydric
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
DRA
F
T
TC07396101.2r Page A-8
Min: 4.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 14
Max: 42 Not reportedNot reportedsandy loam79 inches29 inches 4
Min: 4.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 14
Max: 42 Not reportedNot reportedsandy clay loam29 inches 7 inches 3
Min: 4.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 14
Max: 42 Not reportedNot reportedsandy loam 7 inches 3 inches 2
Min: 4.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 14
Max: 42 Not reportedNot reportedsandy loam 3 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)

> 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Well drainedSoil Drainage Class:
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group:
sandy loamSoil Surface Texture:
RhodhissSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 4
Min: 3.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 4
Max: 14 Not reportedNot reportedloam78 inches38 inches 4
Min: 3.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 4
Max: 14 Not reportedNot reportedclay loam38 inches25 inches 3
Min: 3.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 4
Max: 14 Not reportedNot reportedclay25 inches 7 inches 2
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
DRA
F
T
TC07396101.2r Page A-9
No Wells Found
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
1/4 - 1/2 Mile NWNC0112437 2
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
1/2 - 1 Mile SouthUSGS40000889456 5
1/2 - 1 Mile WestUSGS40000889535 4
1/4 - 1/2 Mile NorthUSGS40000889603 3
0 - 1/8 Mile SouthUSGS40000889541 1
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
1.000State Database
Nearest PWS within 1 mileFederal FRDS PWS
1.000Federal USGS
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
DRA
F
T
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
1280
1120
1120
1240 1
2801080
1 080
1240
1 200
1320
1
280
1
1 60 12
8
0
1
280
13
2
0
1200
12
00
1280
1280 1 280
116 0
1160
13
20
1320
1280
1
2 8

0
1 2 8 0
1240
13 60
1 360
20
1320
1320
1120
11
20
1120
1320 1360
1 3 60
1320
1320
1
3
20
1320
1320
1320
1320
1320
1
320
13
20 1280
1
3201200
1 3 20
1360
1320
1320
1320
1080
108 0
1080
1080
1080
10
80
0
80
1320
1320
1280
1280
1280
1280
1280
1
2
8
0
1 28 0
1 3
2
0
12001240 1320
1280
1240
1240
12 40
12 4 0
1240
1 2 4 0
1240
1 2 40
1240
1 2 4 0
1240
1240 1320
1 2 8 01280
1 2 8 0
1280
1 2 80
1280
1280
1
2
80
1
280
1280
1280
1 280
1280
1280
1 2 8 0
1280
1 280
1280
1280
12
8
0
1120
1
320
1
2
8
0
1280
1280
1280
1240
1200
1200
0
1
160
1
160
1160
1160
1
1
20
1120
1120
112
01120
1120
1 1 2 0
1 1 20
1120
1120
1120
1
1
2
0
0
1
1
2
0
11
2
0
1
1
6
0
1160
160
1160
1160
1
160
1160
1160
1160
1160
1
1
60
11 60
11
60
1160
11 6 0
1 1 6 0
1
1
6
0
1160
1160
11 6 0
1160
1
1
60
1 2 40
1
2
4
0
1240
1240
0
1
2
40
1240
1240
1240
1240
1
2
4
0
1240
1240
1
240
12 401240
1240
1
2
4
0
1
2
4
0
1240
1 2 4 0
1240
1
240
1240
1240
1240
1 240
1240
1 2 4 0
1240
12
0
0
1 2 0 0
1200
1
2
0
0
120 0
0
1200
1200
12001
200
1 200
1
2
0
0
1 20 0
1 2 0 0
1200
1
2
0
0
1200
1200
1 2 0 0
1
2
00
1200
12
0
0
1
2
00
1200
1
2
00
12 0 0
1200
1200 12
0
0
1 2 0 0
1 200
1200
NC
DRA
F
T
TC07396101.2r Page A-11
0814106Longitude: 354443Latitude:
UntreatedTreatment: 101 - 500 PersonsPopulation served:
MORGANTONCity served: 012County FIPS:
28655System zip:
NCSystem state: MORGANTONSystem city:
Not ReportedSystem address: SNOW HILL METHODISTSystem name:
00000200Retail population: Not ReportedDate system deactivated:
7706Date system activated: ActiveActivity status:
NC0112437PWS ID: 28655PWS zip:
NCPWS state: MORGANTONPWS city:
Not ReportedPWS address: SNOW HILL METHODISTPWS name:
System Owner/Responsible PartyPWS type:
NC0112437PWS ID: 28655PWS zip:
NCPWS state: MORGANTONPWS city:
Not ReportedPWS address: SNOW HILL METHODISTPWS name:
System Owner/Responsible PartyPWS type: NC0112437PWS ID:
IPwsactivitycode:
28655Contactzip: NCContactstate:
MORGANTONContactcity: Not ReportedContactaddress2:
Not ReportedContactaddress1: Not ReportedContactphone:
Not ReportedContactorgname: SNOW HILL METHODISTContact:
PrivateOwner: TNCWSPwstype:
GroundwaterPsource longname: 1Pwssvcconn:
200Retpopsrvd: ClosedStatus:
37023Fipscounty: Not ReportedZipserved:
NCStateserved: Not ReportedCityserved:
SNOW HILL METHODISTPwsname: NC0112437Pwsid:
NCState: 04Epa region:
2
NW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
NC0112437FRDS PWS
Not ReportedNote:
Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 45Feet below surface:
1967Level reading date: 1Ground water levels,Number of Measurements:
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units:
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units:
210Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date:
Not ReportedAquifer Type: Felsic GneissFormation Type:
Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline-rock aquifersAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
Not ReportedHUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: BK-041Monitor Location:
USGS North Carolina Water Science CenterOrganization Name:
USGS-NCOrganization ID:
1
South
0 - 1/8 Mile
Lower
USGS40000889541FED USGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
DRA
F
T
TC07396101.2r Page A-12
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units:
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units:
158Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date:
Not ReportedAquifer Type: Felsic GneissFormation Type:
Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline-rock aquifersAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
Not ReportedHUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: BK-091Monitor Location:
USGS North Carolina Water Science CenterOrganization Name:
USGS-NCOrganization ID:
5
South
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
USGS40000889456FED USGS
Not ReportedNote:
Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 35Feet below surface:
1967Level reading date: 1Ground water levels,Number of Measurements:
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units:
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units:
300Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date:
Not ReportedAquifer Type: Mafic GneissFormation Type:
Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline-rock aquifersAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
Not ReportedHUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: BK-040Monitor Location:
USGS North Carolina Water Science CenterOrganization Name:
USGS-NCOrganization ID:
4
West
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
USGS40000889535FED USGS
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units:
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units:
140Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date:
Not ReportedAquifer Type: Mafic GneissFormation Type:
Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline-rock aquifersAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
Not ReportedHUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: BK-042Monitor Location:
USGS North Carolina Water Science CenterOrganization Name:
USGS-NCOrganization ID:
3
North
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
USGS40000889603FED USGS
0815030Longitude: 354200Latitude:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
DRA
F
T
TC07396101.2r Page A-13
Not ReportedNote:
Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 65Feet below surface:
1967Level reading date: 1Ground water levels,Number of Measurements:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
DRA
F
T
TC07396101.2r Page A-14
0%30%70%3.560 pCi/LBasement
Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedLiving Area - 2nd Floor
0%0%100%1.775 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor
% >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea
Number of sites tested: 10
Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 28655
: Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
: Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L.
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Federal EPA Radon Zone for BURKE County: 2
7.76.67.152
9.33.117.454
__________________________________
Max pCi/LMin pCi/LAvg pCi/LNum Results
Radon Test Results
State Database: NC Radon
AREA RADON INFORMATION
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
®
DRA
F
T
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005, 2010 and 2015 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOW Information SystemR
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC07396101.2r Page PSGR-1
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
DRA
F
T
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
North Carolina Wildlife Resources/Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Natural Heritage Occurrence Sites Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic) that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site’s significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or high quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC07396101.2r Page PSGR-2
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
DRA
F
T
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC07396101.2r Page PSGR-3
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
DRA
F
T
This Report contains certain products owned by or licensed by Tele Atlas North America, Inc.
("TANA") and licensed to EDR pursuant to an agreement between EDR and TANA (the "TANA
Agreement"). Such products include the Dynamap® /2000 (commencing with the most current
version, nationwide coverage, ArcInfo™ format, tiled by county, with semi−annual Updates) and
are referred to in this Report as the "Licensed Products".
The use of the Licensed Products with a non−TANA map may result in increased variance
between the location displayed on the map and ground truth location.
The recipient of the Report (hereinafter referred to as an "End User") shall use such Report solely
for its internal purposes and not for resale.
U.S. GOVERNMENT RIGHTS. If End User is an agency, department, or other entity of the United
States Government, or funded in whole or in part by the United States Government, then use,
duplication, reproduction, release, modification, disclosure or transfer of this commercial product
and accompanying documentation, is restricted in accordance with the LIMITED or RESTRICTED
rights as described in DFARS 252.227−7014(a)(1) (JUN 1995) (DOD commercial computer
software definition), DFARS 227.7202−1 (DOD policy on commercial computer software), FAR
52.227−19 (JUN 1987) (commercial computer software clause for civilian agencies), DFARS
252.227−7015 (NOV 1995) (DOD technical data − commercial items clause); FAR 52.227−14
Alternates I, II, and III (JUN 1987) (civilian agency technical data and noncommercial computer
software clause); and/or FAR 12.211 and FAR 12.212 (commercial item acquisitions), as
applicable. In case of conflict between any of the FAR and DFARS provisions listed herein, the
construction that provides greater limitations on the Government’s rights shall control.
Contractor/manufacturer is Tele Atlas North America, Inc., 11 Lafayette Street, Lebanon, NH
03766−1445. Phone: [phone]. The Licensed Products are © 1984−2008 by Tele Atlas North
America, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. For purpose of any public disclosure provision under
any federal, state or local law, it is agreed that the Licensed Products are a trade secret and a
proprietary commercial product and not subject to disclosure.
If End User is an agency, department, or other entity of any State government, the United States
Government or any other public entity or funded in whole or in part by the United States
Government, such End User agrees to protect the Licensed Products from public disclosure and
to consider the Licensed Products exempt from any statute, law, regulation, or code, including
any Sunshine Act, Public Records Act, Freedom of Information Act, or equivalent, which permits
public access and/or reproduction or use of the Licensed Products. In the event that such
exemption is challenged under any such laws, any and all right to retain any copies or to use of
the Licensed Products shall be terminated and considered immediately null and void. Any copies
of the Licensed Products held by End User shall immediately be destroyed. If any court of
competent jurisdiction considers this clause void and unenforceable, in whole or in part, for any
reason, then all Licensed Products previously delivered to End User will be destroyed.
DRA
F
T
Appendix F
Historical Documentation
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
EBI Project # 1123003753
2353 U.S. Highway 70 West
Morganton, North Carolina
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
DRA
F
T
Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com
2353 U.S. 70
2353 U.S. 70
Morganton, NC 28655
July 21, 2023
7396101.3
DRA
F
T
Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Certified Sanborn Results:
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, LLC or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
page-
The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million
fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris &
Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track
historical property usage in approximately 12,000
American cities and towns. Collections searched:
Library of Congress
University Publications of America
EDR Private Collection
The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™
Limited Permission To Make Copies
Sanborn® Library search results
Contact:EDR Inquiry #
Site Name: Client Name:
Certification #
PO #
Project
07/21/23
2353 U.S. 70
2353 U.S. 70 EBI Consulting
21 B Street
Morganton, NC 28655
7396101.3
Burlington, MA 01803
Joshua Ritz
The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by EBI Consulting were
identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection
includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is
authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results
can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn.
The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the
day this report was generated.
6C18-4125-B94E
NA
UNMAPPED PROPERTY
1123003753
This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library,
LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target
property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property
were not found.
Certification #: 6C18-4125-B94E
EBI Consulting (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely
for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may
be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with
EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request.
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, LLC. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. This Report is provided on an
“AS IS”, “AS AVAILABLE” basis. NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT.
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES AND THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, OF ANY
KIND OR NATURE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN
THIS REPORT, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING ACCURACY, QUALITY, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS,
COMPREHENSIVENESS, SUITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT,
MISAPPROPRIATION, OR OTHERWISE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC OR ITS
SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES OR THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR ANY DIRECT, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES OF ANY TYPE OR KIND (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF USE, OR LOSS OF
DATA), ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT.
Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels, or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only an assessment
performed by a qualified environmental professional can provide findings, opinions or conclusions regarding the environmental risk or conditions in, on or at any
property.
Copyright 2023 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
7396101 3 2
DRA
F
T
2353 U.S. 70
2353 U.S. 70
Morganton, NC 28655
Inquiry Number: 7396101.5
July 26, 2023
The EDR-City Directory Image Report
6 Armstrong Road
Shelton, CT 06484
800.352.0050
www.edrnet.comEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources Inc
DRA
F
T
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
Executive Summary
Findings
City Directory Images
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to
Environmental Data Resources, LLC. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and
surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. This Report is provided on an “AS IS”, “AS AVAILABLE” basis. NO
WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
RESOURCES, LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES AND THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, OF
ANY KIND OR NATURE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND
INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING
ACCURACY, QUALITY, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS, COMPREHENSIVENESS, SUITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MISAPPROPRIATION, OR OTHERWISE. ALL RISK IS
ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES,
AFFILIATES OR THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR ANY DIRECT, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES OF ANY TYPE OR KIND (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF PROFITS,
LOSS OF USE, OR LOSS OF DATA), ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE
DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels, or risk
codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be
interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only an
assessment performed by a qualified environmental professional can provide findings, opinions or conclusions regarding the
environmental risk or conditions in, on or at any property.
Copyright 2023 by Environmental Data Resources, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in
part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, LLC, or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, LLC or its affiliates.
All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
DRA
F
T
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DESCRIPTION
Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assist
environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past
activities.EDR’s City Directory Report includes a search of available business directory data at
approximately five year intervals.
RECORD SOURCES
The EDR City Directory Report accesses a variety of business directory sources, including Haines, InfoUSA,
Polk,Cole, Bresser, and Stewart. Listings marked as EDR Digital Archive access Cole and InfoUSA records.
The various directory sources enhance and complement each other to provide a more thorough and
accurate report.
EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The
purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer.
RESEARCH SUMMARY
The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. A check mark indicates
where information was identified in the source and provided in this report.
Year Target Street Cross Street Source
2020 EDR Digital Archive
2017 Cole Information
2014 Cole Information
2010 Cole Information
2005 Cole Information
2000 Cole Information
1995 Cole Information
1992 Cole Information
EDR Digital Archive
1988 US West Marketing
1983 Miller's City Directory
7396101-5 Page 1
DRA
F
T
FINDINGS
TARGET PROPERTY STREET
2353 U.S. 70
Morganton, NC 28655
Year CD Image Source
US 70 W
2020 pg A3 EDR Digital Archive
2017 pg A6 Cole Information
2014 pg A9 Cole Information
2010 pg A12 Cole Information
2005 pg A15 Cole Information
2000 pg A18 Cole Information
1988 -US West Marketing Street not listed in Source
1983 -Miller's City Directory Street not listed in Source
US HIGHWAY 70 W
1995 pg A21 Cole Information
1992 pg A22 Cole Information
7396101-5 Page 2
DRA
F
T
FINDINGS
CROSS STREETS
Year CD Image Source
DYSARSVILLE RD
1992 -EDR Digital Archive Target and Adjoining not listed in Source
DYSARTSVILLE RD
2020 pg. A1 EDR Digital Archive
2017 pg. A4 Cole Information
2014 pg. A7 Cole Information
2010 pg. A10 Cole Information
2005 pg. A13 Cole Information
2000 pg. A16 Cole Information
1995 pg. A19 Cole Information
1988 -US West Marketing Street not listed in Source
1983 -Miller's City Directory Street not listed in Source
PRITCHARD DR
2020 pg. A2 EDR Digital Archive
2017 pg. A5 Cole Information
2014 pg. A8 Cole Information
2010 pg. A11 Cole Information
2005 pg. A14 Cole Information
2000 pg. A17 Cole Information
1995 pg. A20 Cole Information
1992 -EDR Digital Archive Target and Adjoining not listed in Source
1988 -US West Marketing Street not listed in Source
1983 -Miller's City Directory Street not listed in Source
7396101-5 Page 3
DRA
F
T
City Directory Images
DRA
F
T
-
DYSARTSVILLE RD
EDR Digital Archive
7396101.5 Page: A1
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2020
3909 LEVI HORNEY
ROGER BAUMGAURTNER
3919 CHRISTOPHER CAPPS
VON MOSTELLER
3925 BRUCE PUTNAM
3939 JEFFERY RUDISILL
JESSE HORNEY
KATHY HORNEY
LEROY HORNEY
MELISSA REED HORNEY
3943 CAROLYN LAIL
3955 THOMAS REED
3975 GARY SHELL
3989 AMY FENDER
AMY SEIDEL
DAVID FENDER
4036 GRACE WATSON
HENRY BURT
RACHEL EPLEYDRA
F
T
-
PRITCHARD DR
EDR Digital Archive
7396101.5 Page: A2
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2020
3982 RICKY HOYLE
3984 TIMOTHY MCPETERS
TINA MCPETERS
3986 DUSTIN BOLLINGER
ROCKY BOLLINGER
DRA
F
T
-
US 70 W
EDR Digital Archive
7396101.5 Page: A3
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2020
2309 BURDETTE HUGHES
CHARLES HUGHES
DARRYL HUGHES
GRACE HUGHES
NORMA SPEAGLE
VICTOR SPEAGLE
2343 CALEB SMITH
DAVID SMITH
2347 JANE EDWARDS
2353 BRAD CAVANAUGH
DANNY VANCE
DON BLACKWELL
ED FAIRBANKS
ETHEL HARRIS
KATRINA MARTINEZ
MARY RESENDIZ
ROBERTO LOPEZ
STEVE OSBORN
TAMMY ARROWOOD
TINA MCPETERS
2365 MIKALA HOUPE
RYAN HAWKINS
SCOTT FURTADO
2379 EMILY MORGAN
2395 DAVID REED
KAREN REID
DRA
F
T
-
DYSARTSVILLE RD
Cole Information
7396101.5 Page: A4
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2017
3909 BAUMGAURTNER, ROGER
3925 PUTNAM, BRUCE C
3939 HORNEY, LEROY N
3945 ARNEY, JOSEPH A
3955 REED, THOMAS W
3975 SHELL, GARY W
3989 FENDER, DAVID M
4005 DUBOSE, SANDRA
DRA
F
T
-
PRITCHARD DR
Cole Information
7396101.5 Page: A5
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2017
3964 SMITH, TIMOTHY S
3974 JONES, MARIA
3982 KEELING, DANETTE K
3986 CAMPBELL, THELMA C
DRA
F
T
-
US 70 W
Cole Information
7396101.5 Page: A6
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2017
2300 BROWN, DANIEL J
2335 MORETZ, DANIEL
2347 EDWARDS, JANE C
2353 BLANTON, MICHAEL
BRADSHAW, JOSHUA
EPLEY, KENNY R
GREENE, JESSICA
HARRIS, ETHEL K
MCPETERS, TINA A
OSBORN, JOHN F
SMITH, JAMES E
TATE, HELIX O
2365 HAWKINS, RYAN
2379 WALKER, TRULA R
2395 REED, DAVID CDRA
F
T
-
DYSARTSVILLE RD
Cole Information
7396101.5 Page: A7
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2014
3909 BAUMGAURTNER, ROGER
3919 SHEILA, HEATHER
3925 PUTNAM, BRUCE C
3929 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
3939 HORNEY, LEROY N
3941 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
3943 HORNEY, VERNON J
3945 ARNEY, JOSEPH A
3955 REED, THOMAS W
3975 SHELL, GARY W
3989 SEIDEL, AMY N
4003 CRANE, SANDRA S
DRA
F
T
-
PRITCHARD DR
Cole Information
7396101.5 Page: A8
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2014
3925 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
3964 SMITH, TIMOTHY S
3974 CAMPBELL, THELMA
3982 KEELING, DANETTE A
3986 BOLLINGER, ANGELA
DRA
F
T
-
US 70 W
Cole Information
7396101.5 Page: A9
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2014
2300 BROWN, DANIEL
ROBINSON, STEPHANIE N
2309 FERGUSON, DAPHNE E
2333 XIANG, KAO
2335 JACKSON, MELISSA
2347 EDWARDS, JANE C
2349 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
2353 AUTREY, DEBRAH
COYLE, MADELYN
EPLEY, KENNY R
MCPETERS, GENE
MOSES, CHRISTOPHER
RESENDIZ, MARY
SAMS, RANDY L
SMITH, JAMES E
STAFFORD, RAY
2365 ABERNATHY, MALLIE B
2379 WALKER, TRULA R
2395 REED, DAVID CDRA
F
T
-
DYSARTSVILLE RD
Cole Information
7396101.5 Page: A10
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2010
3909 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
3919 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
3929 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
3939 HORNEY, LEROY N
3941 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
3943 HORNEY, VERNON J
3945 ARNEY, JOSEPH A
3955 REED, THOMAS W
3975 SHELL, GARY W
3989 HART, OPHELIA A
4003 CRANE, SANDRA S
DRA
F
T
-
PRITCHARD DR
Cole Information
7396101.5 Page: A11
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2010
3925 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
3944 DAVIS, TERRY
EDMONSON, LARRY
3964 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
3974 HOYLE, GREG A
3982 HOYLE, RICKY D
3986 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
DRA
F
T
-
US 70 W
Cole Information
7396101.5 Page: A12
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2010
2284 POTEET, JUDY
2309 COOK, MARGARET W
FERGUSON, DAPHNE E
HUGHES, GRACE C
2333 XIANG, KAO
2335 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
2347 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
2349 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
2353 AUTREY, DEBRAH
BARLOW, ALICE
BUCHANAN, PATRICIA
EPLEY, KENNY R
GORDON, CINDY L
MARKLAND, RETHA
MODE, KALEE
OLSEN, CRYSTAL
PEARSON, NANCY
PIERSON, GENE
RESENDIZ, MARY
SAMS, RANDY L
SCHNEIDER, DAVID A
STRUSE, KENDRA
TATE, HELIX O
TERRY, SCOTT
2365 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
2379 WALKER, CLINTON A
2395 REED, DAVID C
DRA
F
T
-
DYSARTSVILLE RD
Cole Information
7396101.5 Page: A13
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2005
3909 PEDIGO, JENNIFER L
3919 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
3929 CURFMAN, JESSICA A
3939 HORNEY, LEROY N
3941 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
3943 TRAVISON, BETTIE
3945 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
3955 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
3975 SHELL, GARY W
4003 CRANE, SANDRA S
DRA
F
T
-
PRITCHARD DR
Cole Information
7396101.5 Page: A14
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2005
3944 EWERT, DAVID V
3956 COMER, JOHN M
MICHAELS, BOBBY
3964 SMITH, TIMOTHY S
3974 HOYLE, GREG A
3982 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
DRA
F
T
-
US 70 W
Cole Information
7396101.5 Page: A15
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2005
2300 ROBINSON, DANIEL
2309 SPEAGLE, RANDY
2335 MCDANIELS, CHARLES A
2347 GARRISON, JULIE M
2353 CARSWELL, VICKY
GUERRERO, CONNIE
HARRIS, ETHEL K
HITCHENS, BRENDA R
MARKLAND, WILLIAM C
MARTINEZ, JOE
MASON, JOYCE
MOODY, N
SAMS, RANDY L
SAULMAN, THOMAS
STAFFORD, CINDY L
TATE, HELIX
TESTER, PHILLIP A
WACASTER, ROY
YEARICK, RICHARD
2365 BRISTOL, BOBBIE J
2379 WALKER, CLINTON A
2395 REED, DAVID I
DRA
F
T
-
DYSARTSVILLE RD
Cole Information
7396101.5 Page: A16
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2000
4471 KISER, C R
4617 FREEMAN, TIM
4635 SIDS MARKET
4644 LOR, SOUA
4663 BROWNING, MARTY
4697 JOHNSON, BUD
4749 TAYLOR, BETTY E
4818 FARRIS, BEN
DRA
F
T
-
PRITCHARD DR
Cole Information
7396101.5 Page: A17
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2000
3982 KEELING, DANETTE
3986 KEELING, DANETTE
DRA
F
T
-
US 70 W
Cole Information
7396101.5 Page: A18
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2000
2302 REEP, KAY
2309 NORMAN, N
2353 HUDGINS, NIKKI
MOODY, N
TESTER, CAROL
YEARICK, RICHARD
2385 LEATHERMAN, M Y
2395 JOHNSON, THAD F
DRA
F
T
-
DYSARTSVILLE RD
Cole Information
7396101.5 Page: A19
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
1995
3929 BOURGWILLIAMSN, GISELLA
HUMMEL, JAMES
3939 HORNEY, LEROY
3945 HORNEY, FANNIE P
3955 COOPER, L E
3975 SHELL, WAYNE
3989 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
4036 WATSON, JOHN R
4085 PATTON, JOHNNY L
4312 EPLEY, HOMER L
4393 MOONEY, SUSAN
4421 COURTNEY, ROBERT
4471 KISER, C R
4493 HUGHES, KENNETH
4617 FREEMAN, TIM
4635 SIDS MARKET
4663 BROWNING, MARTY
4697 JOHNSON, BUD
4751 EPLEY, MYRTLE D
4779 CRAWLEY, LOYE L
4803 CRAWLEY, ALVIN L
4817 GREENE, J T
4818 FARRIS, BEN
4834 HOPKINS, HOPE
4858 CRAWLEY, JEWELL
4859 DOBSON, R G
4879 LOR, THAI
4890 WATSON, PAUL
4891 HANG, XUE
4898 HOUK, SID
4914 YOUNG, JERRY
4947 WHEELER, GERALD
4956 DEATON, WAYNE K
4957 PERKINS, J K
4982 SHUPING, HELEN
4983 WELCH, CURRAN
5000 PASSMORE, JERRY G
5011 BETHEL METHDST CHRC
5018 KALE, PAUL G
5035 KISER, LARRY D
5054 MILLIGAN, JAMES P
5132 DODD, OTIS
5394 POLLARD, HICKS JR
6155 BROWNING, ED
6170 LIEDKIE, ALLEN A
6230 FYFE, BRETT
6231 CHRISTIANA FURN
FITZGERALD, JEFFREY
DRA
F
T
-
PRITCHARD DR
Cole Information
7396101.5 Page: A20
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
1995
3944 EVANS, THOMAS
3964 OLLIS, LAKE
3982 NICHOLS, BARBARA
DRA
F
T
-
US HIGHWAY 70 W
Cole Information
7396101.5 Page: A21
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
1995
1619 RICK WILSON AUTO REPAIR
2124 BELLE FARM
2425 JAMES W CRAWLEY HEATING & BLDG
2663 BRESCO LIMITED
2907 BUBBA'S CARDS
DRA
F
T
-
US HIGHWAY 70 W
Cole Information
7396101.5 Page: A22
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
1992
1615 GREENE, CLAY
2353 YANCEY, C D
2629 DELLINGER, BOBY J
TODD, KYLE
2681 CHAPMAN, M
DRA
F
T