CCB0057_Nash_SwiftCreek_StructuralFill_May2023GW_FID1827372_20240201

ReUse Technology Water Quality Monitoring
and Corrective Action
Effectiveness Report — May
2023
Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill — CCB0057
Battleboro, Nash County
North Carolina
November 6, 2023
Project No.: 0397281
BERM
The business of sustainability

November 6, 2023
Water Quality Monitoring and Corrective
Action Effectiveness Report - May 2023
Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill — CCB0057
Battleboro, Nash County
North Carolina
Chris Means,
Project Manager
ERM NC, Inc.
300 West Summit Avenue
Suite 330
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
Phone:[phone]
© Copyright 2023 by ERM Worldwide Group Ltd and / or its affiliates ("ERM").
All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form,
or by any means, without the prior written permission of ERM
Brian Wilson, P.G.
Principal -in -Charge
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology November 6, 2023

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION
EFFECTIVENESS REPORT —MAY 2023
Battleboro, Nash County
CONTENTS
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION AND SITE HISTORY.............................................................................................1
1.1 Introduction...........................................................................................................................................1
1.2 Summary of Site Environmental History and Corrective Action............................................................1
2. CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL............................................................................................................3
2.1 Hydrogeology........................................................................................................................................3
2.2 Contaminant Fate and Transport..........................................................................................................3
3. WATER QUALITY MONITORING ACTIVITIES................................................................................4
3.1 Objectives.............................................................................................................................................4
3.2 Monitoring Methods..............................................................................................................................5
4. MONITORING RESULTS...................................................................................................................6
4.1 Groundwater Monitoring Results..........................................................................................................6
4.2 Surface Water Monitoring Results........................................................................................................9
4.3 Laboratory Data Quality Analysis..........................................................................................................9
5. SUMMARY......................................................................................................................................... 9
APPENDIX A HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER RESULTS
APPENDIX B FIELD DATA SHEETS
APPENDIX C LABORATORY DATA
APPENDIX D MANN KENDALL ANALYSIS REPORT
List of Figures
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map and Monitoring Well Locations
Figure 3 Shallow Groundwater Potentiometric Map — May 2023
Figure 4 Groundwater Analytical Sample Results — May 2023
Figure 5 Groundwater Analytical Sample Results — Sulfate — Surficial Aquifer
Figure 6 Hydrogeologic Profile A -A'
Figure 7 Sulfate Concentrations over Time
t_ist of Tables
Table 1 Monitoring Well Construction Data Summary
Table 2 Historical Groundwater Elevation Data
Table 3 Groundwater and Surface Water Analytical Sample Results
Table 4 Groundwater and Surface Water Field Parameter Results
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology November 6, 2023 Page i

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION INTRODUCTION AND SITE HISTORY
EFFECTIVENESS REPORT — MAY 2023
Battleboro, Nash County
INTRODUCTION AND SITE HISTORY
1.1 Introduction
On behalf of ReUse Technology, Inc. (ReUse), ERM NC, Inc. (ERM) has prepared this Water Quality
Monitoring Report to summarize corrective action activities conducted for the Swift Creek Coal
Combustion By -Products (CCBs) Structural Fill site (CCB-0057) located along U.S. Highway 301 north of
Battleboro, Nash County, North Carolina, (hereafter called the "Site" or "subject property"). Corrective
actions have been implemented at the Site to address groundwater quality impacts in accordance with
the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) (ERM, February 27, 2015) approved by the North Carolina Department
of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) on March 12, 2015. The corrective actions were implemented in 2017
and included temporary removal of CCB materials to allow raising the floor elevation above the seasonal
high groundwater table, placing the CCB materials on the raised floor in a reduced footprint, installation of
a synthetic liner (cap) over the limits of the CCBs, and drainage improvements to minimize rainfall
infiltration. Groundwater and surface water monitoring activities presented herein are being conducted at
the Site to monitor the effectiveness of the previously completed corrective actions. The Site location is
shown in Figure 1. A Site map is included as Figure 2.
1.2 Summary of Site Environmental History and Corrective Action
The Site consists of a 25-acre property in northeast Nash County bounded by US Highway 301 to the
west, Lane Swamp to the north and east, and Swift Creek to the south. The area surrounding the Site is
comprised of sparsely populated agricultural land and partially wooded land. In December 1991, the
Solid Waste Section approved a proposed plan submitted by ReUse to use CCBs as structural fill
material in the development of the Site as a commercial property. In September 1992, ReUse began
placement of CCBs as beneficial use fill at the Site. In January 2003, the last shipment of CCBs was
accepted at the Site. In March 2003, the Site had been graded, compacted, covered with an 18-inch soil
cap and planted with grass seed. In December 2003, Full Circle Solutions, Inc. purchased the business
assets of ReUse Technology, Inc., including the Swift Creek Site. According to records of Full Circle
Solutions, Inc., a total of approximately 134,000 tons of CCBs were placed at the Site. On November 4,
2004, the Closure Notice was forwarded to the Solid Waste Section.
In August 2004, Sherrill Environmental, Inc. reported the results of groundwater monitoring at four newly
installed monitoring wells (MW-1 S/MW-1 D, MW-2S/MW-2D) at the Site. Lead and sulfate were detected
at concentrations above the respective groundwater quality standards listed in Title 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code (NCAC), Subchapter 2L .0202 (2L standards), in shallow groundwater on the east
side of the CCB fill. In October 2004, the Solid Waste Section required an assessment by ReUse to
determine the extent of the groundwater impact resulting from the placement of CCBs at the Site. In
March 2006, a Comprehensive Site Assessment for the Swift Creek Project was submitted to the Solid
Waste Section that included the results of an expanded groundwater and surface water assessment. In
September 2006, a Compliance Order was issued by the Solid Waste Section to ReUse. In December
2006, pursuant to the Compliance Order, an Assessment Monitoring Plan and a Swift Creek Dewatering
Analysis were submitted to the Solid Waste Section. The Assessment Monitoring Plan described a
proposed groundwater and surface water monitoring program for the Site. The Swift Creek Dewatering
Analysis described a proposed dewatering subsurface drain along the western boundary of the fill along
US Highway 301 to remove water from the coal ash fill and lower the local groundwater table to provide a
required minimum 1-foot vertical separation between coal ash and seasonal high groundwater elevations.
The Assessment Monitoring Plan was approved by the Solid Waste Section in February 2007. The Swift
Creek Dewatering Analysis was conditionally approved by the Solid Waste Section in July 2007 based on
the performance of the proposed dewatering plan.
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology November 6, 2023 Page 1

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION INTRODUCTION AND SITE HISTORY
EFFECTIVENESS REPORT — MAY 2023
Battleboro, Nash County
In January 2008, a dewatering subsurface drain was installed consisting of a 6-inch polyvinyl chloride
(PVC) drain pipe along the western boundary of the fill along US Highway 301. The drain was designed to
lower the local groundwater table to provide a required minimum 1-foot vertical separation between coal
ash and seasonal high groundwater elevations. Groundwater collected in the pipe was transmitted by
gravity flow to an outfall box located at the north end of the Site at Lane Swamp.
The groundwater and surface water monitoring program was initiated at the Site in October 2007 in
accordance with the Assessment Monitoring Plan. The program consisted of semi-annual sampling and
laboratory analytical testing for metals and sulfates at eight groundwater monitoring well locations and
three surface water monitoring locations. Groundwater levels were also measured in the monitoring wells
and piezometers in order to evaluate ground water flow direction and determine water levels relative to
the CCB fill. The reported results of the groundwater monitoring from 2007 to 2014 confirmed
groundwater quality impacts including concentrations of sulfate, arsenic and lead at levels above the
respective 2L standards. The monitoring reported no impacts to surface water quality in Lane Swamp or
Swift Creek adjacent to the facility.
The Division of Waste Management issued a "Warning Notice" to Full Circle Solutions and ReUse dated
May 16, 2014. The notice stated that the required groundwater vertical separation between filled CCBs
and seasonal high groundwater elevations had not been achieved and exceedances of the 2L standards
had been routinely reported. As a result, a "Groundwater Corrective Action Application" was required to
be submitted for approval.
On behalf of Full Circle Solutions and ReUse, ERM submitted a Corrective Action Application, dated
October 16, 2014, to the Division of Waste Management for approval. The Corrective Action Application
proposed the construction of a synthetic liner (cap) and drainage improvements as corrective actions to
significantly reduce or eliminate rainfall infiltration and leachate generation from the beneficial fill. Two
contingency corrective actions also were identified. The Division issued approval in December 2014 and
requested the submittal of a detailed Corrective Action Plan (CAP) to the Solid Waste Section.
The Corrective Action Plan was submitted in February 2015 and approved by the NCDEQ Solid Waste
Section in March 2015. The Corrective Action Plan was designed to raise existing CCBs to above
historically high groundwater levels to prevent the leaching of contaminants of concern from the existing
CCBs. The CAP included the installation of a protective liner system, cover soil layer, and drainage
outlets to prevent infiltration of precipitation into the CCBs to assist in the prevention of leaching. The
footprint of the limits of ash was condensed from approximately 10 acres to 5 acres, reducing the
effective infiltration area. Implementation of the CAP was delayed approximately one year in 2015-2016
due to a North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) project to realign US Highway 301, along
with bridge replacements across Swift Creek. The corrective measures began on April 24, 2017 and
were completed on January 12, 2018.
In June 2018, two new monitoring wells, MW-5RS and MW-5RD, were installed as replacements for
former upgradient wells MW-5S and MW-5D, which were abandoned in 2015 by the NCDOT as part of
the Highway 301 realignment project. The new wells were located hydraulically upgradient (west) of the
Site on the west side of Highway 301 (see Figure 2) to monitor background water quality in the surficial
aquifer (MW-5RS) and deep aquifer (MW-5RD) zones. The monitoring wells were installed under an
NCDOT right-of-way encroachment agreement (E-0420981800025).
In accordance with the CAP, a performance monitoring and reporting plan was implemented in 2018 to
monitor the effectiveness of the corrective action. The elements of the performance monitoring plan
include:
■ Semi-annual groundwater and surface water monitoring and reporting,
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology November 6, 2023 Page 2

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
EFFECTIVENESS REPORT — MAY 2023
Battleboro, Nash County
■ Quarterly inspection and reporting of the Site for cap structural integrity, erosion control, proper
drainage, etc., and
■ Corrective Action Effectiveness Reports prepared every five years to evaluate and document a
reduction in contaminant concentrations in groundwater and a stable or decreasing plume extent.
2. CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
2.1 Hydrogeology
The following updated conceptual site model (CSM) has been developed based on the corrective action
and monitoring work performed by ERM, as well as previous site investigation activities performed by
others.
The Site is located in the Coastal Plain physiographic province of North Carolina. The Site surficial
geology consists of alluvial terrace deposits consisting of layers and mixtures of silts, clay, sands and
gravels. The alluvial deposits at the Site range in thickness from approximately 8 to 16 feet. The shallow
groundwater at the Site occurs in the alluvial deposits and is referred to as the surficial or alluvial aquifer.
The alluvial aquifer sands are of low to moderate permeability (average hydraulic conductivity 0.67
feet/day). Within the alluvial aquifer zone, a yellowish -brown clay layer was encountered in the majority
of the borings for monitoring wells and piezometers installed at the Site. The clay layer of the alluvial
aquifer at the Site is approximately 1 to 4 feet thick and has a low permeability (average hydraulic
conductivity 0.002 feet/day). The clay layer behaves as a confining layer or perching layer, which
appears to limit the vertical migration of contaminants at the Site. On the west (upgradient) edge of the
Site, the clay layer was reported to be absent in the borings for former wells MW-5S, MW-5D, P-23 and
P-24. The alluvial deposits at the Site are underlain by the Yorktown Formation, a regionally extensive
marine deposit. The upper Yorktown Formation, consisting typically of greenish -gray, clayey, silty, Shelly,
very fine sands, is encountered at the Site from approximately 13 feet below ground surface (bgs) to the
maximum depth of investigation of 35 feet bgs, and has a low permeability (average of 0.002 feet/day).
No groundwater quality impacts have been detected in monitoring wells completed in the deeper
Yorktown aquifer zone.
The general groundwater flow pattern at the Site is controlled largely by two groundwater discharge
features: Lane Swamp to the north and east, and Swift Creek to the south. Groundwater flow in the area
of the Site is generally from west to east with a northeast component of flow toward Lane Swamp at the
north end of the Site, and a southeast component of flow toward Swift Creek at the south end of the Site.
2.2 Contaminant Fate and Transport
The key features of the CSM for contaminant fate and transport are summarized as follows:
■ The depth to groundwater ranges from the ground surface at the creeks and swamps to more than 6
feet bgs in topographically higher areas (not including the beneficial fill footprint).
■ The regional groundwater flow regime within the surficial (alluvial) aquifer flows west to east, with
north and south flow components near Swift Creek and Lane Swamp, which serve as shallow
groundwater discharge features.
■ The estimated groundwater velocities at the Site are very low. The historical calculated groundwater
velocities are approximately 6 to 27 feet per year for the surficial (alluvial) aquifer and approximately
0.03 feet per year for the deeper Yorktown aquifer.
■ Prior to the 2018 corrective action, seasonal rises of the underlying water table and rainfall infiltration
downward through the old soil cap resulted in water infiltration into the coal ash fill. Constituents
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology November 6, 2023 Page 3

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION WATER QUALITY MONITORING ACTIVITIES
EFFECTIVENESS REPORT — MAY 2023
Battleboro, Nash County
within the coal ash fill were dissolved by the infiltration water and became mobile. The former
infiltration mechanism has been mitigated by the corrective action.
Once the infiltration water enters the surficial groundwater, it migrates laterally above a clay confining
or perching layer within the alluvial aquifer zone towards the groundwater discharge features of Lane
Swamp and Swift Creek, which serve to limit the lateral extent of the affected groundwater. The
limited lateral extent of the affected groundwater is evident at wells MW-2S and 2D, located
approximately 200 feet east of the former perimeter of the beneficial fill, where groundwater
concentrations are below 2L standards. Similarly, there is no evidence of affected groundwater to
the west (upgradient) as demonstrated by groundwater monitoring results at current monitoring wells
MW-5RS and MW-5RD and former monitoring wells MW-5S and 5D.
■ Based on historical groundwater monitoring results, the groundwater quality impacts at the Site are
limited to the surficial aquifer zone. No groundwater quality impacts are detected in the deeper
aquifer zone of the Yorktown Formation.
The swamps and creeks surrounding the beneficial fill site act as a "natural perimeter drain" and
intercept the affected groundwater. Based on the historical surface water monitoring results, there
are no surface water quality impacts to Lane Swamp or Swift Creek due to affected groundwater from
the Site.
3. WATER QUALITY MONITORING ACTIVITIES
3.1 Objectives
Demonstration of effectiveness of the completed remediation is the primary objective of the water quality
monitoring program (i.e., remedial performance monitoring). This objective is achieved by monitoring the
reduction of the site -specific contaminants of concern (COC) in groundwater, therefore mitigating the
potential for surface water quality impacts due to contaminated groundwater migration and discharge to
surface water.
The applicable preliminary remedial goals for groundwater and surface water are summarized in the
following table.
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology November 6, 2023 Page 4

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION WATER QUALITY MONITORING ACTIVITIES
EFFECTIVENESS REPORT — MAY 2023
Battleboro, Nash County
Groundwater
•. •
•. •
Compounds
Arsenic
(•
0.01
•
0.15
Barium
0.7
NE
Cadmium
0.002
h
Chromium (Total)
0.01
h
Lead
0.015
0.025
Mercury
0.001
0.000012
Selenium
0.02
0.005
Silver
0.02
0.00006
Sulfate
250
NE
Total Dissolved Solids
500
NE
pH
6.5-8.5
6.0-9.0
Title 15A NCAC, Subchapter 2L .0202, (April 1, 2022)
2 Title 15A NCAC, Subchapter 2B .0200 (2B standards) for Class C Waters (July 26, 2021)
NE = Not Established
mg/L = milligrams per liter
h = hardness dependent dissolved metal standard
Water quality monitoring is conducted in accordance with the NCDEQ-approved Corrective Action Plan
(ERM, March 2015). The following sections summarize the groundwater and surface water monitoring
activities conducted at the Site during the reporting period.
3.2 Monitoring Methods
A water quality monitoring event was conducted at the Site on May 25-26, 2023. Groundwater and
surface water samples were collected from the following monitoring wells and surface water locations.
Monitoring Wells Surface Water Locations
MW-1 S SW-1
MW-1 D SW-2
MW-2S
MW-2D
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5RS
MW-5RD
MW-6
M W-7
M W-8
Subtotal: 11 Subtotal: 2
The monitoring well and surface water locations are shown on Figure 2. Monitoring well construction
details are summarized in Table 1. Surface water location SW-3 was inaccessible during the sampling
event due to the presence of a biological hazard (water moccasin); therefore, no sample could be
collected from this location.
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology November 6, 2023 Page 5

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION MONITORING RESULTS
EFFECTIVENESS REPORT — MAY 2023
Battleboro, Nash County
All monitoring wells were gauged for water levels and then purged and sampled by low -flow purging
methods. The surface water samples were collected as grab samples using clean containers. Field
parameters (pH, conductivity, temperature, dissolved oxygen and oxidation-reduction potential) were
measured for each groundwater and surface water sample by calibrated meters. Well purge logs were
completed for each monitoring well to document the stabilization of field parameters prior to sample
collection. Well purge logs included in the Field Data Sheets provided in Appendix B. The groundwater
and surface water samples were placed in laboratory supplied containers and placed on ice. The samples
were submitted to North Carolina certified laboratory Pace Analytical Services (Formerly Shealy
Environmental Services) (NC329) and were analyzed for eight specific metals, sulfates and total
dissolved solids using the analytical methods summarized below:
Analytical Methods
EPA Method 601 OD Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium (Total)
Lead
Selenium
Silver
EPA Method 7470A Mercury
EPA 300.0 Sulfates
SM 2540 C Total Dissolved Solids
4. MONITORING RESULTS
4.1 Groundwater Monitoring Results
Groundwater monitoring activities were conducted at 11 monitoring wells at the Site. Groundwater depth -
to -water gauging and elevation data are presented in Table 2. The groundwater elevations in the surficial
aquifer on May 25, 2023 ranged from 89.94 feet above mean sea level (ft MSL) at MW-8 located on the
east (downgradient) side of the Site to 94.53 ft MSL at MW-4 located on the west (upgradient) side of the
Site. The groundwater elevations are below the base of the CCB fill, which generally ranges from 94 to
99 ft MSL from east to west. A potentiometric surface map for the surficial (alluvial) aquifer zone for the
May 2023 monitoring event is presented as Figure 3. Groundwater flow in the surficial aquifer over most
of the Site is generally west to east towards Lane Swamp Swift Creek, which serves as a groundwater
discharge zone.
Using the current groundwater elevation data, the hydraulic gradients for the Site were calculated and are
summarized in the following table.
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology November 6, 2023 Page 6

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION
EFFECTIVENESS REPORT - MAY 2023
Battleboro, Nash County
MONITORING RESULTS
Horizontal Hvdraulic Gradients
MW-5RS 90.86 0.79 700.00 0.0011
MW-6 90.07
M W-4 94.53 2.53 400.00 0.0063
M W-3 92.00
Averaae Hvdraulic Gradient 0.0037
Vertical Hvdraulic Gradients
MW-1 S 88.84 90.84 0.06
MW-1 D 69.10 90.78
19.74 0.0030
Down
MW-2S 81.07
MW-2D 61.22
90.74
0.13
19.85
0.0065
Down
90.61
MW-5RS 85.80
MW-5RD 66.07
90.86
-2.46
19.73
-0.1247
Up
93.32
Groundwater seepage velocities were calculated using Darcy's equation, summarized as:
V=(Kxi)/ne
Where:
V = seepage velocity of groundwater in ft/day
K = hydraulic conductivity in ft/day
i = hydraulic gradient (ft/ft)
ne = effective porosity
As summarized below, the estimated groundwater seepage velocity in the surficial aquifer zone using a
primary porosity range of 10-25% is approximately 3 to 7.5 feet per year (ft/yr) based on the May 2023
hydraulic gradients and the previously calculated mean hydraulic conductivities.
Seepage Velocity Range (Surficial Aquifer) =
= (0.55) (0.0037) / (0.25) = 8.17E-03 ft/day
= (0.55) (0.0037) / (0.10) = 2.04E-02 ft/day
Range 25% 2.98 ft/yr
of
porosity 10% 7.46 ft/yr
Seepage
Velocity Approximate Range of 3 to 7.5 ft/yr
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology November 6, 2023 Page 7

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION MONITORING RESULTS
EFFECTIVENESS REPORT — MAY 2023
Battleboro, Nash County
The May 2023 groundwater analytical results are summarized in Table 3 for metals, sulfate and total
dissolved solids (TDS), and in Table 4 for field parameters. Constituents that exceeded 2L standards are
summarized on Figure 4. Laboratory analytical reports for the sampling event are provided in Appendix C.
A historical groundwater data summary is provided in Appendix A.
For the May 2023 monitoring event, four analytes were detected above their respective NC 2L
groundwater standards, as summarized in the following table.
Current Maximum Concentrations in Groundwater — May 2023
mg/L = milligrams per liter
Sulfate, a primary indicator analyte for CCB contaminant releases, was detected in groundwater at
concentrations above its 2L standard (250 mg/L) at five of the 11 monitoring wells. The distribution of
sulfate concentrations across the Site is depicted in Figure 5. A hydrogeologic profile across the Site,
including sulfate concentrations in groundwater, is presented in Figure 6. The highest concentration of
sulfate was detected in the groundwater sample collected from monitoring well MW-1 S (654 mg/L)
located on the eastern (downgradient) side of the Site; however, sulfate concentrations decrease in the
downgradient direction, as evidenced by the sulfate concentration (541 mg/L) detected in the sample
collected from the furthest hydraulically downgradient monitoring well (MW-8).
Graphs of sulfate concentrations over time for select monitoring wells are presented in Figure 7. Since
the completion of the corrective action in January 2018, the graphs indicate fluctuating but overall
decreasing sulfate concentration trends at MW-3, MW-6, MW-7 and MW-8, where the most elevated
sulfate levels have historically been observed.
Notably low values of pH were measured in the groundwater samples from MW-6 (3.5), MW-7 (3.5), and
MW-8 (3.7). The low pH values at the three wells are consistent with historical monitoring results, and
correlate with detections of arsenic and lead, in addition to sulfate, at concentrations above their
respective North Carolina 2L groundwater standards at the three wells.
There were no exceedances of 2L standards in the groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells
MW-5RS and MW-5RD located on the west (upgradient) side of the Site, nor in the sample collected from
monitoring well MW-4, located near the southwest limit of the CCB fill area. The groundwater sample
collected from monitoring well MW-4 exhibited an exceedance of the 2L standard for arsenic during the
November 2021 monitoring event, which was not consistent with historical sampling events. The
groundwater sample collected from monitoring well MW-4 during the May 2023 event was again below
the 2L standard for arsenic. Historically, there have been no detectable levels of arsenic at MW-4 since
2010, with exception of the anomalous result from the November 2021 event.
On the east side of the Site, sulfate and TDS concentrations exceeded their 2L standards in groundwater
samples collected from MW-1 S. The sulfate concentrations exhibit an increasing trend in groundwater
sample collected from MW-1 S; however, the May 2023 concentrations are within the range of historical
monitoring results. All remaining constituent concentrations in samples from the four monitoring wells
located on the east side of the Site (MW-1 S, MW-1 D, MW-2S and MW-21D) were below their respective
2L standards with the exception of a concentration of TDS in MW-1 D. The elevated TDS concentration at
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology November 6, 2023 Page 8

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION
EFFECTIVENESS REPORT — MAY 2023
Battleboro, Nash County
SUMMARY
MW-1 D does not appear to be attributable to sulfate or metals, which were below their respective 2L
standards.
Sulfate and TDS concentrations in the groundwater sample collected from well MW-3, which is located on
the central portion of the Site along the southern limit of the CCB fill area, were detected above their 2L
standards, which is consistent with historical monitoring results. However, concentrations of both
constituents detected during the May 2023 event were notably lower than in past events. Sulfate
concentrations in MW-3 show an overall decreasing trend following completion of the corrective action
activities.
4.2 Surface Water Monitoring Results
Consistent with historical monitoring results, all May 2023 surface water monitoring results were below
the respective North Carolina 2B surface water standards for samples collected from Swift Creek (SW-1)
and Lane Swamp (SW-2). As noted previously, surface water location SW-3 was inaccessible and could
not be sampled during the May 2023 monitoring event due to the presence of a biological hazard. The
May 2023 surface water sampling results are summarized in Table 3. Laboratory analytical reports for the
surface water samples are provided in Appendix C. Historical surface water data is summarized in
Appendix A.
4.3 Laboratory Data Quality Analysis
Quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) samples collected during the May 2023 groundwater sampling
activities included one blind duplicate sample collected at MW-1S. The duplicate and parent sample
results for MW-1S can be compared in Table 3. The analytical results of the MW-1S and duplicate
groundwater samples compare favorably, indicating no analytical discrepancy.
4.4 Mann Kendall Analysis
As part of the five year post corrective action review, a statistical analysis was conducted to determine the
corrective action effectiveness. Data was used from the first sampling event post corrective action up to
the most recent data collected in May 2023. Mann Kendall analysis is a common statistical tool for
accessing changes in concentration over time. The results from the statistical analysis can be referenced
in Appendix D.
Following review of the analysis it is noted that sulfate is showing a stable to increasing trend at MW-1S.
Sulfate concentrations in MW-3 are showing an overall significant reduction in sulfate concentrations.
5. SUMMARY
Corrective actions have been implemented at the Site to address groundwater quality impacts in
accordance with the approved CAP. The corrective actions were completed in January 2018 and included
temporary removal of CCB materials to allow raising the floor foundation above the seasonal high
groundwater table, placing the CCB materials on the raised floor in a reduced footprint, installation of a
synthetic liner (cap) over the limits of the CCBs, and drainage improvements to minimize rainfall
infiltration. Groundwater and surface water monitoring activities are being conducted at the Site to monitor
the effectiveness of the previously completed corrective actions.
The May 2023 water quality monitoring event was conducted to evaluate groundwater and surface water
quality at the Site approximately 5.4 years after corrective action implementation. Since the completion of
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology November 6, 2023 Page 9

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION
EFFECTIVENESS REPORT — MAY 2023
Battleboro, Nash County
SUMMARY
the corrective action in 2018, the four monitoring wells (MW-3, MW-6, MW-7 and MW-8) where the
greatest sulfate concentrations in groundwater have historically been detected continue to exhibit overall
decreasing trends as shown in Figure 7. Decreasing sulfate concentration trends indicate that the
corrective action is effectively mitigating groundwater quality impacts at the Site. The May 2023 surface
water quality results continue to demonstrate that there have been no surface water impacts to Swift
Creek or Lane Swamp due to discharges of affected groundwater from the Site.
In accordance with the CAP, semi-annual water quality monitoring will continue at the Site, with the next
monitoring event tentatively planned for December 2023.
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology November 6, 2023 Page 10

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION
EFFECTIVENESS REPORT —MAY 2023
Battleboro, Nash County
SUMMARY
Tables
Table 1 Monitoring Well Construction Data Summary
Table 2 Historical Groundwater Elevation Data
Table 3 Groundwater and Surface Water Analytical Sample Results
Table 4 Groundwater and Surface Water Field Parameter Results
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology November 6, 2023 Page 12

TABLE 1
MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Monitoring
Well
Top of
Casing Elev.
ft MSL
Ground
Surface Elev.
ft MSL
Casing Stick
Up
ft MSL
Screen Interval
ft MSL
Total
Depth (TOC)
ft MSL
Status
MW-1 S
99.54
96.8
2.7
3-13
15.7
Active
MW-1 D
99.90
97.1
2.8
23-33
35.7
Active
MW-2S
94.87
92.1
2.8
6-16
18.7
Active
MW-2D
95.22
92.2
3.0
26-36
39.1
Active
MW-3
102.15
99.2
3.0
7-17
20.0
Active
MW-4
106.06
104.1
2.0
8-18
20.0
Active
MW-5S
102.68
99.7
3.0
6-16
17.0
Abandoned
MW-5D
102.67
99.8
2.9
25-35
37.9
Abandoned
MW-5RS
98.80
TBD
Flush Mount
8-18
18.0
Active
MW-5RD
98.57
TBD
Flush Mount
30-35
37.9
Active
MW-6
98.41
95.0
3.4
6-16
19.4
Active
MW-7
98.63
95.1
3.5
6-16
19.5
Active
MW-8
95.42
92.4
3.0
6-16
19.0
Active
Piezometer
P-1
108.19
105.6
2.6
20-30
32.6
Abandoned
P-2
109.53
106.7
2.8
20-30
32.8
Abandoned
P-3
106.18
104.4
1.8
18-28
30.0
Abandoned
P-4
106.57
104.0
2.6
20-30
32.6
Abandoned
P-5
108.39
105.9
2.5
20-30
32.5
Abandoned
P-6
109.79
107.5
2.3
20-30
32.3
Abandoned
P-7
107.77
105.9
1.9
30-40
41.9
Abandoned
P-8
106.53
103.9
2.6
30-40
42.6
Abandoned
P-9
103.32
100.9
2.4
20-30
32.4
Abandoned
P-10
108.17
106.1
2.1
20-30
32.1
Abandoned
P-11
101.88
99.2
2.7
13-23
25.7
Abandoned
P-12
107.04
104.0
3.0
6-16
19.0
Abandoned
P-13
108.99
105.9
3.1
6-16
19.1
Abandoned
P-14
105.38
101.9
3.5
4-14
17.5
Abandoned
P-15
103.76
101.0
2.8
4-14
16.8
Abandoned
P-16
105.28
102.1
3.2
4-14
17.2
Abandoned
P-17
105.31
101.8
3.5
4-14
17.5
Abandoned
P-18
111.21
107.5
3.7
5-15
18.7
Abandoned
P-19
111.86
108.3
3.6
7-17
20.6
Abandoned
P-20
107.00
104.2
2.8
7-17
19.8
Abandoned
P-21
104.99
99.5
5.5
4.5-11.5
16.5
Abandoned
P-22
103.60
101.8
1.8
17-27
28.8
Abandoned
P-23East
109.75
107.1
2.7
9-19
21.8
Abandoned
P-24West
103.17
101.1
2.1
3-13
15.3
Abandoned
B-1
107.66
105.7
2.0
14-19
21.0
Abandoned
Notes
TOC - top of casing
ft MSL - feet above mean sea level

TABLE 2
HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA
SWIFT CREEK - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Depth Elevation
Depth
Elevation
F Depth Elevation
Depth Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth Elevation
Depth Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Gauging Date
ft BTOC ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC ft MSL
ft BTOC ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC ft MSL
ft BTOC ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
Well Identification
MW-is
MW-1D
MW-2S
MW-213
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5S
MW-51)
MW-6
MW-7
MW-8
MW-5RS
MW-5RD
Lane Swamp
92.25
TOC Elevation (ft MSL):
99.54
99.90
94.87
95.22
102.15
106.06
102.68
102.67
98.41
98.63
95.42
98.80
98.57
TOC Stickup (Ft from GL)
2.7
2.8
2.8
3.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
2.9
3.4
3.5
3.0
-
-
N/A
8-18
N/A
Screened Interval (Ft BGL)
3-13
23-33
6-16
26-36
7-17
6-16
25-35
6-16
6-16
6-16
8-18
30-35
N/A
Geologic Zone Screened
Surficial
Surficial
Surficial
Deep (Yorktown)
I Surficial
Surficial
Surficial
Deep (Yorktown)
Surficial
Surficial
Surficial
Surficial
Deep (Yorktown)
12-Jan-2005
8.21
91.33
8.57
91.33
4.72
90.15
4.7
90.52
9.65
92.50
11.24
94.82
6.01 96.67
6.4 96.27
7.17
91.24
7.63
91.00
NM
1-Aug-2006
8.11
91.43
8.28
91.62
NM
--
NM
--
9.48
92.67
10.15
95.91
5.86 96.82
5.68 96.99
7.18
91.23
7.74
90.89
NM
6-Sep-2006
8.69
90.85
9.05
90.85
4.83
90.04
4.87
90.35
10.32
91.83
11.41
94.65
6.94 95.74
6.84 95.83
7.74
90.67
8.66
89.97
NM
4-Apr-2007
7.80
91.74
8.18
91.72
4.4
90.47
4.75
90.47
9.31
92.84
9.96
96.10
6.12 96.56
5.96 96.71
7.28
91.13
7.8
90.83
4.84 90.58
21-Aug-2007
10.89
88.65
11.30
88.60
6.77
88.10
6.82
88.40
11.4
90.75
13.28
92.78
9.57 93.11
9.42 93.25
10.8
87.61
10.71
87.92
7.67 87.75
21-Oct-2007
11.40
88.14
11.76
88.14
7.31
87.56
7.43
87.79
12.98
89.17
14.06
92.00
10.62 92.06
10.63 92.04
11.9
86.51
11.41
87.22
8.3 87.12
31-Jan-2008
9.13
90.41
9.42
90.48
4.86
90.01
5.02
90.20
10.7
91.45
14.11
91.95
7.65 95.03
8.11 94.56
8.44
89.97
8.71
89.92
5.57 89.85
--
22-Mar-2008
8.10
91.44
8.44
91.46
4.4
90.47
4.54
90.68
9.18
92.97
13.28
92.78
6.98 95.70
7.34 95.33
7.18
91.23
7.79
90.84
4.78 90.64
2.51
89.74
9-Apr-2008
9.26
90.28
9.47
90.43
4.58
90.29
5.02
90.20
10.98
91.17
14.82
91.24
10.87 91.81
10.72 91.95
8.92
89.49
9.06
89.57
5.97 89.45
3.1
89.15
17-Jun-2008
9.12
90.42
9.42
90.48
5.03
89.84
5.23
89.99
10.54
91.61
14.05
92.01
8.93 93.75
8.92 93.75
8.36
90.05
9.06
89.57
6.09 89.33
3.2
89.05
13-Jan-2009
8.22
91.32
8.55
91.35
4.26
90.61
4.46
90.76
9.35
92.80
13.41
92.65
7.16 95.52
7.54 95.13
7.02
91.39
7.6
91.03
4.58 90.84
2.52
89.73
31-Mar-2009
7.60
91.94
7.96
91.94
4.36
90.51
4.38
90.84
6.74
95.41
12.43
93.63
5.98 96.70
6.22 96.45
6.81
91.60
7.2
91.43
4.21 91.21
2.5
89.75
23-Jun-2009
8.62
90.92
8.92
90.98
4.41
90.46
4.77
90.45
10.06
92.09
13.86
92.20
9.83 92.85
9.63 93.04
7.72
90.69
8.52
90.11
5.56 89.86
2.9
89.35
30-Sep-2009
8.86
90.68
9.18
90.72
4.64
90.23
5.00
90.22
10.82
91.33
14.7
91.36
10.4 92.28
10.26 92.41
8.08
90.33
8.51
90.12
5.5 89.92
3.15
89.10
15-Dec-2009
7.54
92.00
NM
--
4.22
90.65
NM
--
8.68
93.47
12.85
93.21
6.3 96.38
NM --
6.78
91.63
7.13
91.50
4.21 91.21
2.6
89.65
31-Mar-2010
7.37
92.17
7.74
92.16
2.42
92.45
4.46
90.76
8.64
93.51
12.52
93.54
5.8 96.88
6.19 96.48
6.77
91.64
7.93
90.70
3.96 91.46
2.14
90.11
29-Jun-2010
9.35
90.19
NM
--
4.94
89.93
NM
--
10.66
91.49
14.62
91.44
9.97 92.71
NM --
9.21
89.20
9.25
89.38
6.31 89.11
3.35
88.90
28-Sep-2010
9.23
90.31
10.05
89.85
4.8
90.07
5.50
89.72
11.55
90.60
14.8
91.26
10.85 91.83
11.1 91.57
9.11
89.30
8.52
90.11
5.48 89.94
4.1
88.15
13-Dec-2010
8.54
91.00
NM
--
4.36
90.51
NM
--
10.12
92.03
14.02
92.04
8.72 93.96
NM --
7.37
91.04
7.93
90.70
4.81 90.61
2.02
90.23
28-Mar-2011
8.03
91.51
8.42
91.48
4.35
90.52
4.67
90.55
9.17
92.98
13.32
92.74
7.45 95.23
7.84 94.83
7.25
91.16
7.53
91.10
4.42 91.00
2.85
89.40
26-Jun-2011
10.05
89.49
10.35
89.55
6.02
88.85
6.32
88.90
11.23
90.92
14.82
91.24
10.59 92.09
10.43 92.24
9.2
89.21
9.98
88.65
7.04 88.38
2.85
89.40
28-Sep-2011
7.84
91.70
NM
--
4.24
90.63
NM
--
8.9
93.25
13.09
92.97
7.62 95.06
NM --
7.13
91.28
7.71
90.92
4.83 90.59
2.2
90.05
18-Dec-2011
8.00
91.54
8.35
91.55
4.32
90.55
4.65
90.57
8.88
93.27
13.1
92.96
7.35 95.33
7.7 94.97
6.98
91.43
7.53
91.10
4.47 90.95
1.8
90.45
23-Mar-2012
8.01
91.53
8.35
91.55
4.31
90.56
4.56
90.66
8.89
93.26
13.01
93.05
7.35 95.33
7.66 95.01
7.03
91.38
7.75
90.88
4.8 90.62
1.65
90.60
28-Jun-2012
8.39
91.15
8.72
91.18
4.65
90.22
4.92
90.30
9.4
92.75
13.38
92.68
8.52 94.16
8.54 94.13
7.42
90.99
8.45
90.18
5.63 89.79
1.95
90.30
18-Sep-2012
7.41
92.13
7.86
92.04
4.16
90.71
4.5
90.72
8.21
93.94
12.73
93.33
7.21 95.47
7.45 95.22
6.82
91.59
7.37
91.26
4.51 90.91
1.52
90.73
17-Dec-2012
8.04
91.50
8.44
91.46
NM
--
NM
--
9.19
92.96
13.36
92.70
8.55 94.13
8.76 93.91
6.82
91.59
7.37
91.26
4.51 90.91
1.45
90.80
26-Mar-2013
7.87
91.67
8.13
91.77
4.23
90.64
4.46
90.76
8.71
93.44
12.84
93.22
7.03 95.65
7.38 95.29
7.08
91.33
7.26
91.37
4.22 91.20
2.05
90.20
12-Apr-2013
8.30
91.24
8.59
91.31
4.31
90.56
4.72
90.50
9.59
92.56
14.13
91.93
8.48 94.20
8.7 93.97
7.47
90.94
7.8
90.83
4.82 90.60
2.85
89.40
25-Jun-2013
8.00
91.54
8.34
91.56
4.18
90.69
4.57
90.65
9.05
93.10
12.97
93.09
6.92 95.76
7.44 95.23
7.05
91.36
7.7
90.93
4.69 90.73
2.45
89.80
26-Sep-2013
8.38
91.16
8.67
91.23
4.32
90.55
4.71
90.51
9.57
92.58
13.65
92.41
9.5 93.18
9.5 93.17
8.75
89.66
8.19
90.44
5.25 90.17
3.05
89.20
28-Mar-2014
7.74
91.80
8.03
91.87
4.33
90.54
4.54
90.68
8.56
93.59
12.53
93.53
6.68 96.00
7.03 95.64
6.92
91.49
7.23
91.40
4.39 91.03
1.85
90.40
27-Jun-2014
8.43
91.11
8.74
91.16
4.45
90.42
4.8
90.42
9.69
92.46
13.93
92.13
7.78 94.90
8.8 93.87
8.33
90.08
8.54
90.09
5.6 89.82
2.95
89.30
26-Sep-2014
7.82
91.72
8.20
91.70
3.91
90.96
4.28
90.94
8.62
93.53
13.81
92.25
6.68 96.00
7.33 95.34
7.1
91.31
7.36
91.27
4.4 91.02
1.95
90.30
17-Dec-2014
7.88
91.66
8.30
91.60
4.22
90.65
4.53
90.69
9.01
93.14
13.71
92.35
7.94 94.74
7.46 95.21
7.24
91.17
7.4
91.23
4.34 91.08
2.1
90.15
28-Jun-2018
9.36
90.18
9.55
90.35
4.56
90.31
4.96
90.26
10.35
91.80
11.65
94.41
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
8.68
89.73
9.12
89.51
5.86 89.56
6.84
91.96
10.52
88.05
22-Jan-2019
8.68
90.86
9.14
90.76
3.8
91.07
4.55
90.67
9.71
92.44
11.24
94.82
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
7.78
90.63
7.93
90.70
4.93 90.49
6.59
92.21
5.75
92.82
17-Jun-2019
8.90
90.64
10.16
89.74
4.06
90.81
4.56
90.66
10.54
91.61
11.96
94.10
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
8.19
90.22
8.55
90.08
5.35 90.07
6.98
91.82
8.95
89.62
9-Mar-2020
8.66
90.88
8.99
90.91
3.95
90.92
4.45
90.77
9.74
92.41
11.26
94.80
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
7.79
90.62
8.08
90.55
4.61 90.81
5.81
92.99
6.01
92.56
9-Nov-2020
8.65
90.89
8.80
91.10
3.73
91.14
4.27
90.95
9.98
92.17
11.56
94.50
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
7.8
90.61
8.2
90.43
4.89 90.53
5.7
93.10
6.03
92.54
25-Mar-2021
8.52
91.02
8.82
91.08
3.8
91.07
4.35
90.87
9.61
92.54
11.3
94.76
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
7.61
90.80
7.5
91.13
NM NM
5.88
92.92
5.28
93.29
1-Nov-2021
8.77
90.77
9.44
90.46
4.21
90.66
4.72
90.50
10.91
91.24
12.94
93.12
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
8.52
89.89
8.7
89.93
5.36 90.06
7.31
91.49
7.35
91.22
22-Mar-2022
8.63
90.91
9.15
90.75
4.19
90.68
4.65
90.57
9.99
92.16
11.56
94.50
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
8.09
90.32
8.45
90.18
5.05 90.37
6.92
91.88
5.79
92.78
19-Oct-2022
9.11
90.43
10.38
89.52
4.24
90.63
5.24
89.98
10.95
91.20
13.11
92.95
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
8.63
89.78
8.71
89.92
5.41 90.01
6.85
91.95
7.53
91.04
23-May-2023
1 8.70
90.84
9.12
90.78
4.13
90.74
4.61
90.61
10.15
92.00
11.53
94.53
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
1 8.34
90.07
8.69
89.94
5.35 90.07
7.94
90.86
5.25
93.32
NE - Not Established
-- = Not Measured
BTOC = Below Top of Casing BGL - Below ground level
ft MSL = feet above Mean Sea Level TOC Stickup data per Sherrill Environmental, Assessment Monitoring Report , Feb 10, 2015 10-7-20 Note: Historical GW elevation values corrected for MW-3
Page 2 of 4
RJRTIDRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 05 SB.xlsA2. GW Elevations

TABLE 3
GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL SAMPLE RESULTS
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 3 of 4
370
Date
D
m
0
po
°7
C
n
a
C
3
s
o
o D.
N C
, 3
r-
N
0-
m
a
c
Z
cn
m
C
3
Cn
-
<
cn
N
m
0
cn
cn
a s
- f<D O
Cn a m
NC 2L Groundwater Standard
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
NC 2B Surface Water Standard
0.15
NE
h
h
0.025
0.000012
0.005
0.00006
NE
NE
GROUNDWATER MONITORING
WELLS
MW-1 S
5/26/23
<0.03
0.104
<0.01
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
622
4,320
FD-01 (MW-1 S)
5/26/23
<0.03
0.111
<0.01
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
654
4,420
MW-1 D
5/26/23
<0.03
0.600
<0.01
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
17.6
880
MW-2S
5/26/23
<0.03
0.114
<0.01
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
<1.0
211
MW-2D
5/26/23
<0.03
0.271
<0.01
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
1.8
317
MW-3
5/26/23
<0.03
0.0398
<0.01
<0.01
0.0111J
<0.0002
<0.04
MW-4
5/26/23
<0.03
0.0657
<0.01
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
17.4
266
MW-5RS
5/25/23
<0.03
0.084
<0.01
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
3.2
249
MW-5RD
5/25/23
<0.03
0.143
<0.01
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
8.2
183
MW-6
5/26/23
0.0461
0.0637
0.0598
0.0656
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.200
<0.05
569
6,7
MW-7
5/26/23
0.0874
<0.01
<0.01
0.185
<0.0002
<0.200
<0.05
565
10,700
MW-8
5/26/23
0.106
<0.01
0.0043J
0.148
<0.0002
<0.400
<0.05
8,400
SURFACE WATER
SW-01
5/25/23
<0.03
0.0376
<0.01
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
6.0
76
SW-02
5/26/23
<0.03
0.0256
<0.005
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
65.2
164
SW-03
---
---
---
---
---
---
All concentrations in milligrams per liter (mg/L) unless
otherwise noted.
--- Not sampled
NE - Not established
Bold with gray background indicates exceedance of NC Groundwater or Surface Water Standard
h = hardness dependent dissolved metal standard
H - Out of holding time
E - Quantitation of compound exceeded calibration range
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 05 SB.xlsx/Table 3-Event Data 2023-5

TABLE 4
GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER FIELD PARAMETER RESULTS
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 4of4
Sample
Location / ID
Date
a
=
CD_0
3
n Q a
n v
3' m
V
3°
s a
N
<
3
s
C LI
v
°
CD
x O
m x
v Q 9
0 p'
<
p
O n
3,< o
cQ <
v Q
NC 2L Groundwater Standard
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NC 213 Surface Water Standard
6.0 - 9.0
NE
NE
50
NE
>5.0
GROUNDWATER MONITORING
WELLS
MW-is
5/26/23
6.2
17.9
6,298
9.4
-9.5
0.61
MW-1D
5/26/23
6.9
19.8
1,460
1.0
-50
0.32
MW-2S
5/26/23
7.0
18.2
382
8.1
-147
0.04
MW-2D
5/26/23
7.3
17.1
529
3.9
-26.9
0.09
MW-3
5/26/23
5.7
18.2
1,226
9.1
96.8
0.22
MW-4
5/26/23
6.4
17.2
413
62.1
57.0
0.36
MW-5RS
5/25/23
7.2
20.0
296
9.9
8.7
2.63
MW-5RD
5/25/23
6.8
19.9
402
3.0
50.2
0.04
MW-6
5/26/23
3.8
15.8
9,422
4.0
227
0.31
MW-7
5/26/23
3.8
17.8
1,540
10.6
209
7.36
MW-8
5/26/23
4.0
17.0
1,234
75.9
244
0.03
SURFACE WATER
SW-01
5/25/23
7.3
19.6
105
15.5
33
6.86
SW-02
5/26/23
6.5
21.4
186
18.1
25
2.81
SW-03
---
---
---
---
---
NE - Not established
Bold value outside of pH standard range
pmhos/cm -micromhos per centimeter
NTU - Nephelometric Turbidity unit
my - millivolt
mg/L - milligram per liter
n/a - not applicable
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 05 SB.xlsx/Table 4-Field Parameters2022-10

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION SUMMARY
EFFECTIVENESS REPORT —MAY 2023
Battleboro, Nash County
Figures
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map and Monitoring Well Locations
Figure 3 Shallow Groundwater Potentiometric Map — May 2023
Figure 4 Groundwater Analytical Sample Results —May 2023
Figure 5 Groundwater Analytical Sample Results —Sulfate —Surf icial Aquifer
Figure 6 Hydrogeologic Profile A -A'
Figure 7 Sulfate Concentrations over Time
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology November 6, 2023 Page 11

E
N,
E
E
A
t
jr J
V
U
100
-d1-
-46.
�
Li
o
lf
-NP-
'4' .7
—b-
-d�
49-
-d�
T TT do. '0'
Z'
-0- �
A�
D r T!—
-d�
4.
-do--
E
2
7 -9b, AP
.—Pope t
too . . d
bL
Ok
% it
E-
T
V1
0 2,000
1100009�� Feet lip Lj 1
------
Legend N Figure 1
Site Site Location Map
0 2,000 ReUse Technology, Inc.
Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill - CCB0057
LD Feet
Environmental Resources Management Environmental Nash County, North Carolina
www.erm.com 1:24,000 1 inch 2,000 feet
ERM
Source: Copyright:© 2013 National Geoqral)hic Society, i-cubed Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet

C h\a"'
,s
BMW=1D� MW-is
MW-2D _0 S
MW-7
�p MW-8
MW-6
r
0 '..
CAI
1:2,400 1 inch = 200 feet
m
0 100 200
E
a
Feet
0
J
Legend
Notes
Figure 2
Shallow Monitoring Well
site CCB -Coal Combustion By -Products
Site Map and Monitoring Well Locations
'. Abandoned Shallow Monitoring Well
CCB Structural Fill Boundary
Reuse Technology, Inc.
Deep Monitoring Well
Topographic Contour (1-ft intervals)
Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill - CCB0057
Battleboro, Nash County, North Carolina
n
Abandoned Deep Monitoring Well
Wetland
n
0 Surface Water Monitoring Location
Freshwater Pond
Environmental Resources Management
n0
Riverine
www.erm.com ERM
Source: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap,
increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survev, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Konq), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Coordinate Svstem: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FPS 3200 Feet
Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, IGN, and the GIS User Community

14 f
SW-1
MW-5S
MW-5D
MW-05RS
90.86
MW-05RD
MO�%-O6
907
-0
MW-01 D
- 90.78*
MW-02D MVV-02S
90.61
n, SW-2
.94
MW-08
/-990.or
1:1,680 1 inch = 140 feet
m
0 70 140
m SW-3
al I
0
�LR
Legend
Figure 3
o
Shallow Monitoring Well
� Site
Potentiometric Surface Contour
Shallow Groundwater Potentiometric Map
'. Abandoned Shallow Monitoring Well
CCB Structural Fill Boundary
— — Inferred Potentionmetric Surface Contour
May 2023
Reuse Technology, Inc.
'-
Deep Monitoring Well
Topographic Contour (1-ft intervals)
Apparent Groundwater Flow Direction
Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill - CCB0057
i
Abandoned Deep Monitoring Well
��� Wetland
Groundwater elevation measurements collected 26 May 2023.
BattlebOrO, Nash County, North Car ling
Y
0 Surface Water Monitoring Location
Freshwater Pond
92.00 - Groundwater Elevation in Shallow Monitoring Well
93.82* - Groundwater Elevation in Deep Monitoring Well (not contoured)
Environmental Resources Management
n
EA Riverine
Elevations in feet above mean sea level
www,erm.com ERM
CCB - Coal Combustion By -Products
Source: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap,
increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survev, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Konq), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Coordinate Svstem: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FPS 3200 Feet
e: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, IGN, and the GIS User Community

n
r / MW-5S MW
MW-4
None Exceed
SW-01
None Exceed
1I1:1,800 1 inch = 150 feet
0 75 150
Ell I Feet
MW-3
Barium 0.038
Sulfate 240
TDS 830
MW-is
Barium 0.23
Sulfate 430
TDS 6,20'
MW-ID
Barium 0.59
Sulfate 15
TDS 780
SW-02
None Exceed
MW-5RD
None Exceed
l'
MW-2D
None Exceed
MW-2S
None Exceed
- MW-511S
None Exceed
a
MW-6
Arsenic
0.055
Barium
0.075
Lead
0.052
Sulfate
600
TDS
5,800
a `mod
a
o
d
!ir
' MW-7
Arsenic 0.080
Barium 0.092
Lead 0.16
Sulfate 670
TDS 8,000
i MW-8
Not Sampled
SW-03
None Exceed
0
Legend
Figure 4
LD
Shallow Monitoring Well
0 site
Groundwater Analytical
Sample Results - Constituents Exceeding
Abandoned Shallow Monitoring Well
CCB Structural Fill Boundary
2L Groundwater Standards — May 2023
Notes:
Reuse Technology, Inc.
Deep Monitoring Well
Topographic Contour (1-ft intervals)
Groundwater samples collected 25/26 May 2023.
Swift Creek CCB Structural FIII - CCB0057
Abandoned Deep Monitoring Well
��� Wetland
430 - Groundwater sample in
e concentration n monitoring wellBattleboro,
Nash County, North Car ling
i
0 Surface Water Monitoring Location
Freshwater Pond
Concentrations in milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Only Concentrations that exceed applicable regulatory standards are shown
EnvironmentalResourco=:gemenc
n
0 Riverine
CCB -Coal Combustion By -Products
www.erm.com ERM
Source: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap,
increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survev, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Konq), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Coordinate Svstem: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FPS 3200 Feet
rce: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, IGN, and the GIS User Community

Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, IGN, and the GIS User Community

Notes:
Vertical Exaggeration = 10:1
1 inch = 150 feet
s
A
Isn
140
130
120
80
70
60
(92.00) Groundwater Elevation
622 Sulfate Concentration (mg/L)
Groundwater Elevation
A (May 2023)
Well Details
150
_ Casing
F=� Screen
140 Subsurface Details
Existing Clay Layer from Boring
Logs (Alluvial)
130
120
110
100
90
80
MW-5S
A
cpl %MW-4
v iD\A/ 4
MW-2S
0
325
650
Feet
70
60
50 I 1 50
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700
Distance (ft)
, Maxar,
W
ih
Figure 6
Hydrogeologic Profile A -A'
ReUse Technology, Inc.
Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill - CCB0057
Battleboro, Nash County, North Carolina
Environmental Resources Management
www.erm.com ERM
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet

FIGURE 7 - SULFATE CONCENTRATIONS OVER TIME
SWIFT CREEK CCB FILL SITE
BATTLEBORO, NASH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
800
700
600
500
400 -
v
300
200
100
0
Off` Oh 00 01 -A, y4' ti0 ti0 ly tL �''
at' at at' at' at' at' at' at' at' at at at at' at' at' at' at' at' at' at
Sulfate • • • • • • Sulfate Concentration Trend
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Oat
1200
1000
800
J
h0
600
v
3 400
N 200
0
Oat/
N. i
fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat
♦Sulfate • • • • • • Sulfate Concentration Trend
M W-6
Ift®AffilkiwA
01 NA ti� ti0 fO
atatat� at atatat� at atatat atatat� at atatat�
Series • • • • • • Sulfate Concentration Trend

FIGURE 7 - SULFATE CONCENTRATIONS OVER TIME
SWIFT CREEK CCB FILL SITE
BATTLEBORO, NASH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1000
900
800
700
600
ao
500
v
400
300 -
200
100
0
at' at' at at at at' at' at' at' at' at at at at' at' at' at' at at
tSulfate • • • • • • Sulfate Concentration Trend
M W-8
1200
1000
soo
£ 600
y
400 i
200
0
o� ow o° do titi titi ti'' ti� tih ;�o ti� tiw ;�° ti° titi titi
fat' fat' fat' Oat' fat' fat' mat' fat' fat' Iat Iat Oat Oat Oat Oat fat
tSuIfate • • • • • • Sulfate Concentration Trend

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION EFFECTIVENESS REPORT —MAY 2023
APPENDIX A HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER
RESULTS
May 2023
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 1 of 13
Sample
Location / ID
Date
D
N
W
°'
�.
C�
n
3
�.
3
n
S
o
3
O C'
v
3
r
�
n
m
C
cn
�
C'
3
<
m
cn
N
m
o
N
(
NO
CD
Q
cn
-o
2
CD
N 3
�"� -o
m o
N m
c' C
S, m
30
S a
o c
�
n
Z s
v
CD
70 O
CD X
v o o
0 9
--^.
<
0
Cn
O
n
O
vCD
NC 2L Ground Water Standard (mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Jul-04
0.028
0.19
<0.001
<0.01
0.068
<0.01
<0.01
490
MW-is
Dec-05
0.02
0.17
<0.001
<0.01
0.042
<0.01
<0.01
608
Oct-06
0.012
0.472
<0.001
<0.01
0.052
0.00064
<0.01
<0.01
740
May-07
<0.01
0.458
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
0.00047
<0.01
<0.01
420
Nov-07
<0.01
0.529
<0.001
<0.01
0.031
0.00089
<0.01
<0.01
520
Jun-08
<0.01
0.619
<0.001
<0.01
0.011
0.00051
<0.01
<0.01
470
Jan-09
<0.01
0.416
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
210
Jun-09
<0.01
0.412
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
220
Dec-09
<0.01
0.256
0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
0.022
<0.01
160
Jun-10
0.012
0.691
0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
280
Dec-10
<0.01
0.599
0.003
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
400
Jun-11
<0.10
0.475
<0.01
<0.10
<0.10
<0.00028
<0.10
<0.10
590
Dec-11
<0.050
0.422
<0.005
<0.050
<0.050
<0.0002
<0.050
<0.050
170
Jun-12
<0.01
0.419
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
150
Dec-12
0.018
0.567
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
180
Jun-13
<0.01
0.174
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
75
Dec-13
<0.01
0.163
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
99
Jun-14
<0.01
0.25
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
110
Dec-14
<0.01
0.408
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
310
Jun-18
<0.015
0.24
<0.005
<0.030
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
320
8,100
5.8
27.0
14,679
5
47
0.18
Jan-19
<0.015
0.27
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
270
4,700
6.0
6.4
4,305
7
4
0.53
Jun-19
<0.015
0.28
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
320
7,400
5.8
21.4
11,617
9
-51
0.19
Mar-20
<0.015
0.22
<0.005
<0.01
0.03
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
480
8,500
6.0
17.0
14,566
5
2
0.25
Nov-20
<0.015
0.26
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
400
8,500
5.6
23.8
8,023
2
-116
0.43
Mar-21
<0.015
0.23
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
430
6,200
6.1
16.1
10,125
8
-80
0.41
Duplicate (FD-01)
Mar-21
<0.015
0.22
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
430
6,100
--
--
--
--
-
Nov-21
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
380
6,800
5.8
20.2
10,278
4.5
-27
0.31
Duplicate (FD-01)
Nov-21
<0.015
0.27
<0.005
<0.01
0.031
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
410
7,000
--
--
--
--
--
Mar-22
<0.015
0.19
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
500
5,100
5.8
15.4
7,670.0
8.2
-7.1
0.0
Duplicate (FD-01)
Mar-22
<0.015
0.19
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
510
5,400
-
--
--
--
Oct-22
<0.015
0.26
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
370
7,500
5.6
16.9
13,200.0
3.2
-54.0
0.3
Duplicate (FD-01)
Oct-22
<0.015
0.27
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
340
6,900
--
--
--
--
May-23
<0.03
0.104
<0.01
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
622
4,320
6.2
17.9
6,298
9.4
-9.5
0.61
Duplicate (FD-01)
May-23
<0.03
0.111
<0.01
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
1 6541
4,420
-
-
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 05 SB.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 2 of 13
o
0
N
CD
N 3
Cn
O
C�
n
cn
(
30
CD
70 O
n
D
W
n
S
o
m
�
cn
NO
�"� -o
m o
S a
o c
Z
CD X
v o o
O
Sample
N
°'
�.
3
�.
O 3
r
�
C
N
CD
Q
N m
C
�
n
s
0 9
--^.
Location / ID
Date
3
C'
v
3
n
C'
3
<
m
m
cn
-o
2
c'
S, m
v
<
vCD
NC 2L Ground Water Standard (mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Jul-04
<0.01
0.54
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
13
MW-1D
Dec-05
<0.01
0.36
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
7.7
Oct-06
<0.01
0.341
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
20
May-07
<0.01
0.343
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
12
Oct-07
<0.01
0.365
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
11
Jun-08
<0.01
0.334
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
14
Jan-08
<0.01
0.356
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
14
Jun-09
<0.01
0.403
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
20
Jun-18
<0.01
0.66
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
19
8,200
6.9
25.6
1,221
3
-93
0.18
Jan-19
<0.01
0.67
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
17
750
6.9
8.9
1,165
7
-46
0.85
Jun-19
<0.01
0.66
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
13
800
6.8
22.4
1,374
11
-56
0.23
Mar-20
<0.01
0.67
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
13
730
7.0
18.2
1,344
9
11
1.97
Nov-20
<0.01
0.6
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
16
810
6.9
24.4
1,304
2
-68
0.40
Mar-21
<0.01
0.59
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
15
780
7.1
20.9
1,229
10
94
1.78
Nov-21
<0.015
0.027
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
16
720
7.0
20.4
1,205
1
-41
0.97
Mar-22
<0.015
0.63
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
14
710
7.0
17.5
1,260
5
76
1.05
Oct-22
<0.015
0.63
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
14
810
7.2
18.4
1,350
5
-45
1.42
May-23
<0.03
0.6
<0.01
I <0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
17.6
880
6.91
19.8
1,460
1
-50
0.32
Jun-04
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
32
MW-2S
Dec-05
<0.01
0.18
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
10.1
Oct-06
<0.01
0.198
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
May-07
<0.01
0.232
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
4.4
Oct-07
<0.01
0.256
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
3.6
Jun-08
<0.01
0.103
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
4.4
Jan-09
<0.01
0.164
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
<5
Jun-09
<0.01
0.173
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
<5
Dec-09
<0.01
0.218
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Jun-10
<0.01
0.229
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Dec-10
<0.01
0.235
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Jun-11
<0.01
0.182
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Dec-11
<0.01
0.216
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Jun-12
<0.01
0.178
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Jun-13
<0.01
0.21
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Dec-13
<0.01
0.199
<0.001
I <0.01
I <0.01
1 <0.0002
<0.01
I <0.01
1 <5
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 05 SB.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 3 of 13
o
0
N
CD
N 3
Cn
O
C�
n
cn
(
30
CD
70 O
n
D
W
n
S
o
m
�
cn
NO
�"� -o
m o
S a
o c
Z
CD X
v o o
O
Sample
N
°'
�.
3
�.
O 3
r
�
C
N
CD
Q
N m
C
�
n
s
0 9
--^.
Location / ID
Date
3
C'
v
3
n
C'
3
<
m
m
cn
-o
2
c'
S, m
v
<
vCD
NC 2L Ground Water Standard (mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Jun-14
<0.01
0.165
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
MW-2S
Dec-14
<0.01
0.2
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Jun-18
<0.015
0.13
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
790
6.3
21.0
448
0
-36
0.18
Jan-19
<0.015
0.21
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
400
6.9
10.0
611
5
-124
0.55
Jun-19
<0.015
0.24
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
430
7.0
20.8
641
2
-152
0.18
Mar-20
<0.015
0.28
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
400
6.9
16.8
759
4
-146
0.36
Nov-20
<0.015
0.24
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
400
6.3
21.3
732
15
-120
0.34
Mar-21
<0.015
0.23
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
340
6.6
16.7
615
2
-101
0.20
Nov-21
<0.015
0.20
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1.0
360
6.9
18.8
684
25
-106
0.30
Mar-22
<0.015
0.20
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1.0
320
7.0
17.0
503
4
-83
0.00
Oct-22
<0.015
0.29
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<2.0
400
7.6
17.5
402
8
-2
0.00
May-23
<0.03
0.114
<0.01
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
<1.0
211
7.0
18.2
382
8
-147
0.04
MW-21D
Jun-04
<0.01
0.17
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.6
Dec-05
<0.01
0.3
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
3.1
Oct-06
<0.01
0.29
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
11
May-07
<0.01
0.254
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
2.9
Oct-07
<0.01
0.273
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
4.8
Jun-08
<0.01
0.265
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
22
Jan-09
<0.01
0.253
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
16
Jun-09
<0.01
0.289
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
6.3
Jun-18
<0.015
0.13
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
790
7.1
25.0
444
10
18
1.30
Jan-19
<0.015
0.30
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.5
310
7.2
9.7
474
5
-94
880.38
Jun-19
<0.015
0.29
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
330
7.3
20.0
501
10
-63
0.27
Mar-20
<0.015
0.29
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
300
7.1
19.4
540
2
75
0.52
Nov-20
<0.015
0.27
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.3
300
7.1
22.0
529
3
-86
0.34
Mar-21
<0.015
0.27
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
300
7.3
20.4
538
2
-84
0.61
Nov-21
<0.015
0.07
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.1
320
7.2
18.3
478
3
-91
0.34
Mar-22
<0.015
0.29
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1
300
7.2
19.1
499
10
-141
0.51
Oct-22
<0.015
0.36
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.2 H
300
7.9
16.3
347
1
33
0.00
May-23
1 <0.031
0.271
<0.01
I <0.01
1 <0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
1 1.81
3171
7.31
17.1
5291
4
-271
0.09
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 05 SB.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 4 of 13
Sample
Location / ID
Date
D
N
W
°'
�.
C�
n
3
�.
3
n
S
o
3
O C'
v
3
r
�
n
m
C
cn
�
C'
3
<
m
cn
N
m
o
N
(
NO
CD
Q
cn
-o
2
CD
N 3
�"� -o
m o
N m
c' C
S, m
30
S a
o c
�
n
Z s
v
CD
70 O
CD X
v o o
0 9
--^.
<
0
Cn
O
n
O
vCD
NC 2L Ground Water Standard (mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Dec-05
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
334
MW-3
Oct-06
<0.01
0.192
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
580
May-07
<0.01
0.342
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
570
Nov-07
<0.01
0.133
<0.001
<0.01
0.036
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
380
Jun-08
<0.01
0.145
<0.001
<0.01
0.022
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
370
Jan-09
<0.01
0.144
<0.001
<0.01
0.013
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
550
Jun-09
<0.01
0.202
<0.001
<0.01
0.081
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
570
Dec-09
0.012
0.192
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
710
Jun-10
0.011
0.094
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
840
Dec-10
<0.01
0.125
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
690
Jun-11
<0.10
0.119
<0.01
<0.10
<0.10
<0.0002
<0.10
<0.10
790
Dec-11
<0.01
0.234
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
410
Jun-12
<0.01
0.125
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.05
<0.01
1,000
Dec-12
0.013
0.136
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
0.011
<0.01
910
Jun-13
<0.10d
0.201
<0.01 d
<0.1 d
<0.1 d
<0.0002
<0.1 d
<0.1 d
950
Dec-13
<0.050d
0.162
<0.005d
<0.05d
<0.05d
<0.0002
<0.05d
<0.05d
890
Jun-14
<0.027d
0.116
<0.002d
<0.07d
<0.01d
<0.0002
<0.025d
<0.07d
970
Dec-14
<0.050d
0.151
<0.005d
<0.05d
<0.05d
<0.0002
<0.05d
<0.05d
760
Jun-18
<0.015
0.066
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
980
830
5.5
27.2
7,611
9
60
0.30
Jan-19
<0.015
0.088
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
930
130
--
4.4
5,256
11
679
369.94
Jun-19
<0.015
0.072
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1,000
4,400
5.2
22.9
6,520
10
-39
0.20
Mar-20
<0.015
0.044
<0.005
<0.01
0.014
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
580
1,600
5.6
16.0
2,456
10.8
-49
0.63
Nov-20
<0.015
0.049
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
710
25,000
5.2
18.9
2,921
6.3
66
0.20
Duplicate (FD-01)
Nov-20
<0.015
0.26
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
370
6,400
--
--
--
--
--
Mar-21
<0.015
0.038
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
240
830
6.0
17.5
1,357
19.8
57
0.38
Nov-21
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
810
2,700
5.4
19.5
3,831
6.0
48
0.39
Mar-22
<0.015
0.038
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
280
850
5.7
15.7
1,287
3.4
-8
0.00
Oct-22
<0.015
0.055
<0.005
<0.01
0.042
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
630
1,800
5.8
16.8
2,340
6.1
113
0.00
May-23
<0.03
0.0398
<0.01
I <0.01
0.011
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
1 251
890
5.7
18.2
1,226
9
97
0.22
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 05 SB.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 5 of 13
Sample
Location / ID
Date
D
N
W
°'
�.
C�
n
3
�.
3
n
S
o
3
O C'
v
3
r
�
v
n
m
C
cn
�
C'
3
<
m
cn
N
m
o
N
(
NO
CD
Q
cn
-o
2
CD
N 3
�"� -o
m o
N m
c' C
u m
30
S a
o c
�
n
Z s
v
CD
70 O
CD X
v o o
0 9
--^.
<
0
Cn
O
n
O
vCD
NC 2L Ground Water Standard (mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
MW-4
Dec-05
<0.01
0.46
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.7
Oct-06
<0.01
0.171
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
May-07
<0.01
<0.100
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
8.6
Oct-07
<0.01
0.147
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.9
Jun-08
<0.01
0.198
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.4
Jan-09
<0.01
0.083
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
6.4
Jun-09
<0.01
0.349
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
7.7
Dec-09
<0.01
0.121
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
7.5
Jun-10
<0.01
0.181
<0.001
0.018
<0.010
0.0006
<0.01
<0.01
15
Dec-10
0.016
0.195
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
16
Jun-11
<0.01
0.227
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01P
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
28
Dec-11
<0.01
0.516
0.003
<0.01
0.021
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
51
Jun-12
<0.01
0.356
0.008
<0.01
0.032
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
100
Jun-13
<0.01
0.109
0.004
<0.01
0.021
0.00078
<0.01
<0.01
250
Dec-13
<0.01
0.167
0.006
<0.01
<0.010
<0.000^
<0.01
<0.01
130
Jul-14
<0.01
0.085
0.0017
<0.01
<0.010
0.00101
<0.01
<0.01
190
Dec-14
<0.01
0.071
0.0017
<0.01
<0.010
0.00111
<0.01
<0.01
260
Jun-18
<0.01
0.041
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
66
450
6.4
25.1
72
7
56
0.28
Jan-19
<0.01
0.044
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
46
320
6.7
9.3
499
13
52
0.83
Jun-19
<0.01
0.052
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
30
310
6.9
22.0
553
7
-91
0.47
Mar-20
<0.01
0.054
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
37
<25
6.5
16.0
455
5
-51
0.42
Nov-20
<0.01
0.061
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
29
250
6.3
43.0
442
10
43
0.52
Mar-21
<0.01
0.059
<0.005
0.14
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
17
200
6.4
16.9
345
22
9
0.26
Nov-21
0.035
0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
25
230
6.4
21.9
320
6
14
0.29
Mar-22
<0.015
0.064
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
17
200
6.4
15.0
352
4
97
0.00
Oct-22
<0.015
0.086
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
20
250
6.4
20.6
381
9
-103
0.00
May-23
1 <0.031
0.0657
<0.01
I <0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
17.4
2661
6.41
17.21
4131
621
571
0.36
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 05 SB.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 6 of 13
Sample
Location / ID
Date
D
N
W
°'
�.
C�
n
3
�.
3
n
S
o
3
O C'
v
3
r
�
n
m
C
cn
�
C'
3
<
m
cn
N
m
o
N
(
NO
CD
Q
cn
-o
2
CD
N 3
�"� -o
m o
N m
c' C
S, m
30
S a
o c
�
n
Z s
v
CD
70 O
CD X
v o o
0 9
--^.
<
0
Cn
O
n
O
vCD
NC 2L Ground Water Standard (mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Dec-05
<0.01
0.45
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.1
MW-5S
Oct-06
<0.01
0.121
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
7
May-07
<0.01
0.218
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
4.7
Oct-07
<0.01
0.278
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
4.9
Jun-08
<0.01
0.046
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
8.7
Jan-09
<0.01
0.051
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
10
Jun-09
<0.01
0.058
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
13
Dec-09
<0.01
0.056
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
17
Jun-10
<0.01
0.057
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
12
Dec-10
<0.01
0.102
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
14
Jun-11
<0.01
0.064
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
17
Dec-11
<0.01
0.087
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
21
Jun-12
<0.01
0.095
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
22
Dec-12
<0.01
0.131
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
25
Jun-13
<0.01
0.025
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
22
Dec-13
<0.01
0.088
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
21
Jun-14
<0.01
0.052
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
14
Dec-14
<0.01
0.082
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
21
Monitor Well
Abandoned on
4/17/15 by
NCDOT and replaced
on 6/11/18
by MW-5RS
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 05 SB.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 7 of 13
o
0
N
CD
N 3
Cn
O
C�
n
cn
(
30
CD
70 O
n
D
W
n
S
o
m
�
cn
NO
�"� -o
m o
S a
o c
Z
CD X
v o o
O
Sample
N
°'
�.
3
�.
O 3
r
�
C
N
CD
Q
N m
C
�
n
s
0 9
--^.
Location / ID
Date
3
C'
v
3
n
C'
3
<
m
m
cn
-o
2
c'
S, m
v
<
vCD
NC 2L Ground Water Standard (mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
MW-5RS
Jun-18
<0.015
0.098
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
12
420
6.9
23.9
454
7
45
3.37
Jan-19
<0.015
0.10
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
3.4
260
6.6
12.6
382
2
78
0.99
Jun-19
<0.015
0.11
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1.0
320
7.0
25.3
594
9
-106
0.17
Mar-20
<0.015
0.09
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
3.1
230
6.6
16.4
363
4
-13
1.10
Nov-20
<0.015
0.10
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
3.1
290
7.0
22.0
477
1
-17
0.32
Mar-21
<0.015
0.07
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.3
210
6.4
18.2
297
3
143
0.69
Nov-21
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.8
300
7.0
22.8
450
3
24
0.47
Mar-22
<0.015
0.10
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
4.7
220
6.7
16.5
364
6
124
0.54
Oct-22
<0.015
0.08
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
150
6.0
22.1
244
0
213
0.35
May-23
<0.03
0.084
<0.01
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
1 3.2
249
7.2
20.01
296
10
9
2.63
Dec-05
<0.01
0.17
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
8.1
MW-5D
Oct-06
<0.01
0.236
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6
May-07
<0.01
0.227
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.8
Oct-07
<0.01
0.258
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.6
Jun-08
<0.01
0.254
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
10
Jan-09
<0.01
0.255
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
10
Jun-09
<0.01
0.261
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
17
Monitor Well
Abandoned on
4/17/15 by
NCDOT and replaced
on 6/11/18
by MW-5RD
MW-51RD
Jun-18
<0.01
0.15
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
26
230
7.3
23.0
327
20
29
0.12
Jan-19
<0.01
0.22
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
17
230
7.4
11.9
374
10
-125
730.47
Jun-19
<0.01
0.21
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
14
250
7.3
24.0
388
9
-94
0.21
Mar-20
<0.01
0.25
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
11
240
7.3
16.2
383
4
-1
2.09
Nov-20
<0.01
0.22
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
7.9
240
7.3
21.5
384
10
-120
0.67
Mar-21
<0.01
0.096
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
4.7
140
7.4
18.6
265
4
136
1.77
Nov-21
<0.01
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.0
190
7.4
21.6
321
1
-45
1.05
Mar-22
<0.015
0.18
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.2
220
7.4
17.7
242
8
-2
2.98
Oct-22
<0.015
0.16
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
7.7 H
170
7.0
20.4
298
0
41
0.40
May-23
1 <0.031
0.143
<0.01
I <0.01
1 <0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
1 8.2
1831
6.81
19.91
4021
3
50
0.04
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 05 SB.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 8 of 13
Sample
Location / ID
Date
D
N
W
°'
�.
C�
n
3
�.
3
n
S
o
3
O C'
v
3
r
�
n
m
C
cn
�
C'
3
<
m
cn
N
m
o
N
(
NO
CD
Q
cn
-o
2
CD
N 3
�"� -o
m o
N m
c' C
S, m
30
S a
o c
�
n
Z s
v
CD
70 O
CD X
v o o
0 9
--^.
<
0
Cn
O
n
O
vCD
NC 2L Ground Water Standard (mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Dec-05
<0.01
1.3
<0.001
<0.01
0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
174
MW-6
Oct-06
<0.01
0.816
<0.001
<0.01
0.013
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
510
May-07
<0.01
0.312
<0.001
<0.01
0.032
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
220
Nov-07
<0.01
0.12
<0.001
<0.01
0.074
0.00026
<0.01
<0.01
290
Jun-08
<0.01
0.08
<0.001
<0.01
0.054
0.00091
<0.01
<0.01
490
Jan-09
<0.01
0.066
NR
NR
0.014
<0.0002
NR
NR
560
Jun-09
0.018
0.155
NR
NR
0.016
0.00026
NR
NR
430
Dec-09
0.014
0.126
<0.001
<0.01
0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
220
Jun-10
0.109
0.313
<0.001
<0.01
0.155
0.0003
<0.01
<0.01
300
Dec-10
0.018
0.138
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.01
<0.01
350
Jun-11
<0.10
0.717
<0.01
<0.10
<0.10
0.00095
<0.10
<0.10
460
Dec-11
<0.01
0.148
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
260
Jun-12
<0.05
0.156
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.05
<0.01
330
Dec-12
0.031
0.131
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
0.012
<0.01
270
Jun-13
<0.01
0.152
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
270
Dec-13
<0.05d
0.247
<0.005d
<0.05d
<0.05d
<0.0002
<0.05d
<0.05d
300
Jun-14
0.0189
0.193
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
260
Dec-14
0.099
0.155
<0.005d
<0.05d
0.122
<0.0002
<0.05d
<0.05d
660
Jun-18
0.043
0.047
<0.005
<0.01
0.045
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1,000
6,300
3.9
25.3
9,665
0
196
0.78
Jan-19
0.039
0.077
<0.005
<0.01
0.022
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
870
3,600
3.8
8.3
4,993
4
290
975.76
Jun-19
0.083
0.086
<0.005
<0.01
0.074
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
760
7,100
3.8
22.0
11,164
5
45
0.20
Mar-20
0.073
0.11
<0.005
<0.01
0.160
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
740
7,000
3.7
16.6
11,118
2
246
0.28
Nov-20
0.066
0.078
<0.005
<0.01
0.085
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
820
7,700
3.5
23.0
9,811
1
294
0.20
Mar-21
0.055
0.075
<0.005
<0.01
0.052
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
600
5,800
3.8
17.6
8,772
1
105
0.26
Nov-21
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
790
5,500
3.7
20.2
9,522
0
231
0.30
Mar-22
0.052
0.083
<0.005
<0.01
0.070
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
670
4,900
3.6
14.9
9,348
3
213
0.00
Oct-22
0.058
0.081
<0.005
<0.01
0.100
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
650
5,100
3.5
19.8
7,890
0
248
0.00
May-23
0.0461
0.0656
<0.01
<0.01
0.073
<0.0002
<0.200
<0.05
569
6,750
3.8
15.8
9,422
4
227
0.31
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 05 SB.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 9 of 13
Sample
Location / ID
Date
D
N
W
°'
�.
C�
n
3
�.
3
n
S
o
3
O C'
v
3
r
�
n
m
C
cn
�
C'
3
<
m
cn
N
m
o
N
(
NO
CD
Q
cn
-o
2
CD
N 3
�"� -o
m o
N m
c' C
S, m
30
S a
o c
�
n
Z s
v
CD
70 O
CD X
v o o
0 9
--^.
<
0
Cn
O
n
O
vCD
NC 2L Ground Water Standard (mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Dec-05
0.038
<0.001
<0.01
0.093
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
379
MW-7
Oct-06
0.03
0.059
<0.001
<0.01
0.053
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
500
May-07
0.017
<0.001
<0.01
0.047
0.0003
<0.01
<0.01
460
Nov-07
0.029
<0.100
<0.001
<0.01
0.124
0.00072
<0.01
<0.01
250
Jun-08
0.019
0.042
<0.001
<0.01
0.072
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
420
Jan-09
0.022
0.052
<0.001
<0.01
0.088
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
500
Jun-09
0.072
0.08
<0.001
<0.01
0.171
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
500
Dec-09
0.128
0.123
<0.01
<0.01
0.273
0.0006
<0.10
<0.10
490
Jun-10
0.208
0.172
<0.01
<0.01
0.379
0.0002
<0.10
<0.10
530
Dec-10
0.23
0.255
<0.01
<0.01
0.649
0.00057
<0.10
<0.10
590
Jun-11
0.134
0.159
<0.01
<0.10
0.396
0.00033
<0.10
<0.10
540
Dec-11
0.107
0.172
<0.01
<0.10
0.468
-U.Uuv<
<0.10
<0.10
640
Jun-12
0.059
0.12
<0.005
<0.05
0.27
<0.0002
<0.05
<0.05
580
Dec-12
0.158
<0.01
<0.10
0.397
<0.0002
<0.10
<0.10
700
Jun-13
0.114
<0.01d
<0.10d
0.19
<0.0002
<0.10d
<0.10d
600
Dec-13
0.07
0.119
<0.05d
<0.050d
0.235
<0.0002
<0.050d
<0.050d
470
Jun-14
0.078
0.093
<0.002d
<0.007d
0.139
<0.0002
<0.025d
<0.010d
670
Dec-14
0.167
0.205
<0.05d
<0.050d
0.553
<0.0002
<0.050d
<0.050d
710
Jun-18
0.041
0.1
0.0074
<0.02
0.089
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
770
9,400
3.8
23.0
13,584
2
243
1.37
Jan-19
0.089
0.097
<0.01
0.190
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
920
8,100
3.8
8.1
10,375
2
250
0.97
Jun-19
0.077
0.16
0.012
<0.01
0.160
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
630
10,000
3.7
21.5
15,916
9
128
0.31
Mar-20
0.093
0.13
0.012
<0.01
0.260
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
770
10,000
4.0
12.0
16,317
5
193
0.41
Nov-20
0.089
0.14
<0.005
<0.01
0.260
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
640
12,000
3.5
20.9
16,203
3
259
0.24
Mar-21
0.080
0.092
<0.005
<0.01
0.160
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
670
8,000
3.8
16.0
12,734
8
186
0.25
Nov-21
0.090
0.13
<0.005
<0.01
0.270
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
700
10,000
3.7
20.9
15,392
4
205
0.27
Mar-22
0.081
0.13
<0.005
<0.01
0.200
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
720
8,300
3.6
14.8
14,887
5
311
0.07
Oct-22
0.077
0.13
0.0052
<0.01
0.220
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
680
9,600
3.5
19.4
16,500
0
255
0.08
May-23
0.0637
0.0874
<0.01
<0.01
0.185
<0.0002
<0.200
<0.05
565
10,700
3.8
17.8
1,540
11
209
7.36
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 05 SB.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 10 of 13
o
0
N
CD
Cn
O
C�
n
(
N 3
30
CD
70 O
n
D
W
n
S
o
m
cn
�
cn
NO
�"� -o
m o
S a
o c
Z
CD X
v o o
O
Sample
N
°'
�.
3
O 3
r
�
C
CD
N m
�
n
s
0 9
--^.
Location / ID
Date
�.
3
C'
v
3
v
n
C'
3
<
m
N
m
Q
cn
-o
2
c' C
u m
v
<
vCD
NC 2L Ground Water Standard (mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
MW-8
May-07
0.025
<0.100
<0.001
<0.01
0.024
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
400
Nov-07
0.03
<0.100
<0.001
<0.01
0.038
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
430
Jun-08
0.031
0.048
<0.001
<0.01
0.027
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
300
Jan-09
0.028
0.039
NR
NR
0.032
<0.0002
NR
NR
350
Jun-09
0.159
0.114
NR
NR
0.173
0.0003
NR
NR
460
Dec-09
0.569
0.286j
<0.016
<0.050
0.0002
<0.135
<0.095
460
Jun-10
0.366
0.232
<0.016
<0.050
0.283
0.0002
<0.135
<0.095
500
Dec-10
0.267
0.243
<0.01
<0.100
0.369
0.0013
<0.100
<0.100
470
Jun-11
0.207
0.223
<0.01
<0.100
0.103
<0.0002
<0.100
<0.100
410.0
Dec-11
<u..i uu
0.321
<0.01
<0.100
<0.0002
<0.100
<0.100
270
Jun-12
0.146
0.169
<0.005
<0.05
0.199
<0.0002
<0.05
<0.05
580
Dec-12
0.11
0.168
<0.01
<0.100
0.234
<0.0002
<0.10
<0.10
580
Jun-13
0.14
0.172
<0.01d
<0.100d
0.169
<0.0002
<0.10d
<0.10d
620
Dec-13
0.126
0.177
<0.05d
<0.050d
0.211
<0.0002
<0.050d
<0.050d
510
Jun-14
0.154
0.13
<0.002d
<0.007d
0.168
<0.0002
<0.025d
<0.010d
700
Dec-14
0.124
0.143
<0.05d
<0.050d
0.263
<0.0002
<0.050d
<0.050d
620
Jun-18
0.055
0.056
<0.005
<0.02
0.10
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1,000
8,400
3.9
19.0
11,539
0
125
0.69
Jan-19
0.1
0.093
<0.005
<0.01
0.100
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
870
7,800
3.8
9.2
11,013
5
216
0.64
Jun-19
0.092
0.092
<0.005
<0.01
0.190
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
780
9,900
3.9
20.5
14,721
2
92
0.33
Mar-20
0.09
0.1
<0.005
<0.01
0.150
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
710
8,100
3.9
13.3
13,074
38
251
0.76
Nov-20
0.078
0.092
<0.005
<0.01
0.230
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
660
16,000
3.4
20.4
13,803
5
204
0.59
Mar-21
Monitor well
unable to be
sampled due
to biological hazard
Nov-21
0.07
0.089
<0.005
<0.01
0.240
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
610
7,300
3.9
19.5
12,230
9
235
0.29
Mar-22
0.071
0.11
<0.005
<0.01
0.110
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
580
6,400
3.8
15.2
11,810
4
261
0.00
Oct-20
0.055
0.1
<0.005
<0.01
0.180
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
650
6,200
3.7
18.4
10,200
4
2
0.00
May-23
0.0598
0.106
<0.01
0.0043J
0.148
<0.0002
<0.400
<0.05
541
8,400
4.0
17.0
1,234
76
244
0.03
All concentrations in milligrams per liter (mg/L) unless otherwise noted
NE - Not established
-- - Not sampled
Bold with gray background indicates exceedance of NC 2L Groundwater Standard
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 05 SB.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

I_1 „=1 L1 101►:I_�+%
SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 11 of 13
O
o
a
�
x
a
o
N.
o
o
C@
� �
<
D
00
n
o
m
m
U)
0-0
m
c
N
v Q
O
Sample
3
0 3.
r
S
U?
C
o
m
y v
Z
s
1<
Location / ID
Date
c'
3
c
3
c
v 3
m
Q
c
c'
3
<
m
v
m
Q
6
=
E
v
ci
C a
V
G�
co cn
V�
0
,�
NC 2B Surface Water Standard -
Class C (ug/1)
0.15
1 NE
1 0.002 h
0.05 h
0.025
10.000012
1 0.005
1 0.00006
1 NE
I NE
1 6.0 - 9.0
1 NE
I NE
1 50
1 NE
1 >5.0
04/03/03
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.005
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
12
SW-01
06/22/04
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<2.0
12/01 /05
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.3
10/06/06
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Surface Water - Upstream
05/04/07
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.6
10/22/07
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
3.8
06/18/08
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
2.5
01/14/09
<0.01
<0.10
NR
NR
<0.01
<0.0002
NR
NR
5.6
06/24/09
<0.01
0.03
NR
NR
<0.01
<0.0002
NR
NR
<5
12/16/09
<0.01
0.048
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.2
06/30/10
<0.01
0.032
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/14/10
<0.01
0.025
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
06/27/11
<0.01
0.041
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/19/11
<0.01
0.025
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/18/12
<0.01
0.028
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
06/25/13
<0.01
0.04
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
04/13/12
<0.01
0.025
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.3
06/27/14
<0.01
0.03
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/17/14
<0.01
0.027
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
06/28/18
<0.015
0.031
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
73
6.95
28.46
101
NM
-2.5
4.2
01/21/19
<0.015
0.090
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
6.1
79
7.84
6.50
107
11.0
37.1
19.2
06/17/19
<0.015
0.058
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.7
110
8.21
27.00
91
139.0
-130.0
2.1
03/09/20
<0.015
0.046
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
3.4
110
6.65
13.00
176
14.4
-45.6
8.4
11/09/20
<0.015
0.032
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.8
91
6.79
15.20
94
9.7
26.2
4.2
03/26/21
<0.015
0.031
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.0
66
6.68
19.20
92
39.0
126.5
6.5
11/01/21
<0.015
0.027
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.3
75
7.32
14.40
77
A
35.4
8.2
03/22/22
<0.015
0.029
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.6
55
7.60
16.00
660
NM
102.0
9.0
10/20/22
<0.015
0.027
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.8
110
5.58
12.19
233
2.2
125.0
7.0
5/25/23
1 <0.031
0.038
<0.01
I <0.01
1 <0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
1 6.01
761
7.31
19.61
1051
15.51
331
6.86
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 05 SB.xlsx/Table A2-Historic SurfaceWater

I_1 „=1 L1 101►:I_�+%
SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 12 of 13
O
o
Q
x
iz
v
o
N.
��
�=
o
o
��
<
D
W
n
o
m
Cl)
m
cn
�
CDo
c
CD
CD a
O
Sample
N
,'
3
0 3
r
Cn
o
C
m
N
Z
n
3 x
Location / ID
Date
0
c'
3
c'
3
c'
CDc
Q
c
3
<
v
a
2
c c
m
<
c
��
G=
n
7-3
1m
NC 2B Surface Water Standard -
Class C (ug/1)
0.15
NE
0.002 h
0.05 h
0.025
1 0.000012
0.005
1 0.00006
1 NE
I NE
1 6.0 - 9.0
1 NE
I NE
1 50
1 NE
1 >5.0
04/03/03
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.005
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
12
SW-02
06/22/04
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<2.0
12/01 /05
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.3
10/06/06
<0.01
0.09
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Surface Water - Downstream
05/04/07
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.6
10/22/07
DRY
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
3.8
08/07/08
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
2.5
01/14/09
<0.01
<0.10
NR
NR
<0.01
<0.0002
NR
NR
5.6
06/24/09
<0.01
0.088
NR
NR
<0.01
<0.0002
NR
NR
<5
12/16/09
<0.01
0.025
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.2
06/30/10
DRY
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/14/10
<0.01
0.034
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
06/27/11
DRY
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/19/11
<0.01
0.027
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/18/12
<0.01
0.031
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
06/25/13
<0.01
0.037
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
04/13/12
<0.01
0.023
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.3
06/27/14
<0.01
0.038
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/17/14
<0.01
0.027
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
06/28/18
<0.015
0.089
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
130
6.98
29.68
369
90.0
-0.4
0.7
01/21/19
<0.01
0.027
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
7
100
5.81
3.60
171
6.6
139.6
14.2
06/17/19
<0.01
0.052
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
150
5.76
26.10
225
23.4
44.2
1.6
03/09/20
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
4.9
98
6.94
13.40
166
5.2
-39.0
9.8
11/09/20
<0.015
0.039
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.1
91
6.41
19.30
133
11.0
-72.0
13.0
03/25/21
<0.015
0.026
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.8
66
7.16
20.40
65
16.2
65.1
9.9
11/09/20
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.5
67
6.8
18.3
325.3
11.4
63.4
3.78
11/01/21
<0.015
0.048
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
5.3
110
6.7
17.1
184.5
6.98
-8.7
2.48
03/22/22
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.5
64
6.7
19.3
70
15
100
11.16
03/22/22
<0.015
0.04
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
1 <0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.6
58
7.1
10.8
59
0.8
37
2.83
5/26/23
1 65.2
1641
6.51
21.4
1861
18.1
251
2.81
1 <0.031
0.0256
<0.005
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 05 SB.xlsx/Table A2-Historic SurfaceWater

I_1 „=1 L1 101►:I_�+%
SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 13 of 13
O
o
'a
CD
x
CL
0
N.
N
��
o
D
_
oo.
?
<
fl
D
W
c�
n
3
o
cn
m
U)
C
m
3
o
-
c
D
m a
O
Sample
m
°'
3
0 3.
r
B
-
c
o
v
Z
3
xCDL
Location / ID
Date
3
3
3
m
Q
3
<
m
m
m
a
2
c
m
" <
c
3
° D
c�i'
7
NC 2B Surface Water Standard -
Class C (ug/I)
0.15
1 NE
1 0.002 "
0.05 "
1 0.025
10.000012
1 0.005
1 0.00006
1 NE
I NE
1 6.0 - 9.0
NE
NE
50
NE
>5.0
05/04/07
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
2.4
SW-03
10/22/07
DRY
06/18/08
<0.01
0.089
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
3.3
01/14/09
<0.01
<0.10
NR
NR
<0.01
<0.0002
NR
NR
20
Surface Water - Downstream
06/24/09
<0.01
0.087
NR
NR
<0.01
<0.0002
NR
NR
<5
12/16/09
<0.01
0.075
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
14
06/30/10
<0.01
0.328
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
47
12/14/10
<0.01
0.074
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
16
06/27/11
DRY
12/19/11
<0.01
0.065
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
8
12/18/12
<0.01
0.067
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.5
06/25/13
<0.01
0.087
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
7.4
04/13/12
<0.01
0.051
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
23
06/27/14
<0.01
0.038
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/17/14
<0.01
0.08
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
9.9
06/28/18
<0.015
0.032
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
76
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
01/21/19
<0.015
0.03
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
31
160
5.6
6.3
257
14.5
138
13.1
06/17/19
<0.015
0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
99
5.7
26.4
235.5
19.7
48.4
5.06
03/09/20
<0.015
0.035
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
9.8
94
6.3
10.5
265.4
6.98
55.1
8.9
11/09/20
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.5
67
6.8
18.3
325.3
11.4
63.4
3.78
03/25/21
Unable to collect
sample
due to biological
hazard near
sampling
location
11/01/21
<0.015
0.026
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
9.3
82
6.5
20.7
172.8
7.28
34.6
3.14
03/22/22
1 <0.015
0.036
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1 151
1201
6.51
16.41
811
11.001
69.0
10.83
05/25/23
1 DRY
All concentrations in micrograms per liter (ug/L) unless otherwise noted
NE - Not established
-- - Not sampled
NM - Not measured
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 05 SB.xlsx/Table A2-Historic SurfaceWater
Bold indicates exceedance of NC 2B Water Quality Standard
h = hardness dependent dissolved metal standard

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION EFFECTIVENESS REPORT — MAY 2023
APPENDIX B FIELD DATA SHEETS
May 2023
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology

ERM
Bottle Order/Label Sheet
Site: Swift Creek
ERM Project Number: 0397281
5 ZSZ3
BOTTLE LABEL
Water Level
Metals
(6010)
Sulfate
(300)
TDS
(2540C)
* M W-OIS-WG-202003
70
X
X
X
MW-OID-WG-202003
X
X
X
MW-02S-WG-202003
X
X
X
MW-02D-WG-202003
X
X
X
MW-03-WG-202003
X
X
X
MW-04-WG-202003
X
X
X
MW-05RS-WG-202003
X
X
X
MW-05RD-WG-202003
; 2
X
X
X
MW-06-WG-202003
,
X
X
X
MW-07-WG-202003
, �'
X
X
X
MW-08-WG-202003
�,
X
X
X
SW-01-WG-202003
—2 z'
X
X
X
SW-02-WG-202003
_ _ 2- 12,19
X
X
X
SW-03-WG-202003
X
X
X
FD-01-WG-202003
X
X
X
-WG-202003
X
X
X
SUM (Bottle Count): 1 16 1 16 1 16
Notes
Please include:
- 1 trip blank per cooler.
- At least 1 CoC per cooler.
- I custody seal per cooler.
- Prepaid shipping labels, if possible.
*Collect FD-01 at MW-01S
Key:
= Normal sample
= Duplicate sample
= QAQC sample
= Extra set for breakage
ERM Field Team Note: add the sample day in dd format to the end of the sample ID (i.e. MW-C

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
r
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other) D fkew
Sample ID: AW - Q - Zo
2 �
Date: & /ZO 2 3
Time Z 15
Sampling Personnel (circle one):
<�=—Rda.FarrD
Andrew Jaskowiak
Weather Conditions (circle one):
Sunny, P ly ClRiily, Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, ck U ompletion
��--..
Well Tag Present: 1Fes,) No
Well Locked: e , No Lock Present: s, No
Well ID info on Tag: No
Well Bolted: v Flo Well Cap:
XeDNo
Well Cap Condition d, Replace, Other:
Well Pad Conditio a li, Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Location: 16rasAsphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (T.D.): c3i0
Screen Length:
5, (015, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): tt) I 'Z
Well Diameter:
a 4, s, 8
Total Volume Purged: 2-7100mL
Casing Type:
eel
Purge Rate: (0 0 mL/min
Sampling Device:
tti', Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point:
op of Ca.inb other
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.): L
Color:
Odor: Yes, No
Time:
min
Volume
Pur ed
DTW:
feet
Temp
CC)
pH
std units
SpC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria2
(gallons)
(see note
belOW)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 mV
+/-
10%4
(,O
I
o .j
g
vq.
1
1799
U
.(0
2
Z
0.
- 1ce
-8
boo
Cl-9
.e)
c.1
-Z
-� 1
5 -Do
1 00
D- O
O
I
-�
10
9•
- ,o
f
qO U
qq
I
�4'
. 30
-
j •
--
J
v
5
(vo
q
Field Parameters measured with: YSI
Official Sampling Date & Time: 5 /Z (, /70 Z j/ I Z 5 S
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010D HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 — 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540C — 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1)- Do not measure depth to bottom of well until after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that maybe resting on the well bottom.
(2)-Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3)-Total draNdown In well to be less than 0.1 m (0.32 it). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep drawdown below 0.1 m (0.32 ft).
(4) +/-10%when turbidity is over 10 NTUs.
(5) Well Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
(6)- DO Is not a slabil¢alion criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard operating Procedure.
(7)-ORP is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
N
ERM
Site Name; Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other)
Sample ID: ..0 15 O S US Z
Date: 40 ZZv2
Time: 5
Sampling Personnel (circle one): a_Fa
Andrew Jaskowiak
Weather Conditions (circle one):
P� Clou , Cloudy, Rain, Other
-'Sunny,
Well Type: Flush Surface Completiol5 Stick Up CompQbn
Well Tag Present: e No
Well Locked: a No Lock Present: )(Z)No
Well ID info on Tag: es No
Well Bolted: es, No Well Cap: )Q No
Well Cap
Condition. oa , Replace, Other.
Well Pad Condltio . Good, acked, Replace, Other:
Well Location: rass sphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (T.D.):
Screen Length:
5, 1615, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): (1)
Well Diameter:
2 4, s, 8
Total Volume Purged:
Casing Type:
V , steel
Purge Rate: 100 mUmin
Sampling Devic :-
Peristaltic, Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: -Polyethylene
Measuring Point:
Top of casing other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.): 12,
Color:
Odor: Yes, No
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
CC
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria2
(gallons)
(see note
belOW)3
+/_
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/_
10 mV
+/_
10%4
I .
Ciqt
U .(da
51.
6
0Iq
I.
to, v.5
W(
0
,o
T. 00
17.
U .70
C1 15
15.5
(�
(0, 3
U
D
(i.
0
0-
-4-
1
4
•v
(o.
UI 5
.5
-�
.5
10
0
0
I So
-
5
ffoll
p
I�•
to&
Z9
f6
-0-601
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro /
Official Sampling Date & Time: 5/ l �G�j / l os
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative:
Hold Time (days):
Lab:
Metals 6010D HNO3
28
Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 —
28
Pace Analytical
TDS 2540c —
7
Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1)- Do not measure depth to bottom of well until after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending times that maybe resting on the Well bottom.
(2) -Stabilize.. criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3) -Total drawdown In well to be less than 0.1 m (0.32 ff). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep drawdown below 0.1 m (0.32 it).
(4) +/-10%when turbidity is over 10 NTUs.
(5) Well Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
(6) - DO is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7)- ORP Is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling' SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
FD- of - (/\-"

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
I.• 1j��,
I; .
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: Monit r Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other) i� - a2
Sample ID: `,- Cif w✓ 7OZ 067 z
Date: 2-C,- 2-0,
Time: 5-1
Sampling Personnel (circle one): Amanda Farr
A rew Jask ialc
Weather Conditions (circle one): . Sunn , Partly Cloudy,
Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well Type: Flush surface Completion, _ ck U pletion
Well Tag Present: (Y No
Well Locked: �Q, No Lock Present• , , No
Well ID info on Tag: e No
Well Bolted: Yes, o Well Cap: 2.5
Well Cap Con ition•, - oo Replace, Other:
Well Pad Conditior�.,Goo racked, Replace, Other:
Well Locatio Gra , Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (T.D.):
Screen Length: 5, 0 15. 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): t1) �'
Well Diameter: 4, 6, 8
Total Volume Purged:
Casing Type: Pv eel
Purge Rate: ' g,g mL/min
Sampling Device: "-. eristal • , Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point: t4kf Ca fig other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.): j
Color: Odor: Yes, No
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
(°C)(Sid
pH
units
SpC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria2
(gallons)
(see note
below)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 mV
+/-
10%4
z
K9Z
I
1
� �
o
A4
yZ
1
0
Z l
zT
1'7,
10
q
7
n `17,1
-2 H
®f tJ
—zG161,
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro/
Official Sampling Date & Time: I' ,
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: /Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010D HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 — 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540C 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1) - Do not measure depth to bottom of well until after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that maybe resting on the well bottom.
(2)- Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecuWe measurements.
(3) - Total draniovm in arell to be less than 0.1 in (0.32 fit). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep drawdo= below 0.1 m (0.32 n).
(4) +/- 10 % vfien turbidity Is over 10 NTUs.
(5) Well Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
(6) - DO Is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7) - ORP is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other) /I t'�
Sample ID: A,— 023 — L-' " 0 2 ,
—
Date: 9 �2-04
Time: I
Sampling Personnel (circle one): A
anda Farr
A drew Jaskowiak
Weather Conditions (circle one): Su
y, Partly Cloudy,
Cloudy; Rain t3tfier
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, ick U
Completion
Well Tag Present: ; Ye , No
Well Locked: e , No Lock Present:
e , No
Well ID info on Tag: tes, No
Well Bolted: Y s, a, Well Cap:
, No
Well Cap Conditio o , Replace, other:
Well Pad Condition: oo , Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Location: , Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (T.D.): 1 %t ql3
Screen Length: 5, 12, 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): t11
Well Diameter: 4, 8, 8
Total Volume Purged: y✓, (�
Casing Type: Py , Steel
Purge Rate: -75 L - mUmin
Sampling Device: I?erista Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point: op of Casi other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.): [
Color: (n F.t Odor: Yes,
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
(eC)
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria2
(gallons)
(see note
below)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 my
+/-
10%,
ly,
),
/112 1
0 L c2
191 '7 2
—11% (
2-Z
�L
a r
OJ
„
't Z
(r
(v
!
Z
'
)7
z
Ir
i
iJ Ly
99
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro /
Official Sampling Date & Time: 51413)
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010D HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 — 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540C 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1) - Do not measure depth to bottom of well unit after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that maybe resting on the well bottom.
(2) -Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3) -Total dravdown in well to be less than 0.1 in (0.32 it). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep dravclovm below 0.1 m (0.32 ft).
1096 atren turbidity Is over 10 NTUs.
(5) Well Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
(6)- DO Is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundvter sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7)-ORP is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
i �0
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type:(t onitor ell, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other)
Sample ID: -
Date: (- 7
Time: f
Sampling Personnel (circle one): Amanda Farr
ndrew Jaskowia
Weather Conditions (circle one): Sunny, Partly Cloudy,
C o n, ther
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, -tick completion
Well Tag Present: dY�s, No
Well Locked: Y s, No Lock Present: YQ, No
Well ID info on Tag: , No
Well Bolted: Yes, a Well Cap: Ke , No
Well Cap Condition: o , Replace, Other:
Well Pad ConditionZoWd, Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Location: ra , Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (T.D.): Zv, a.
Screen Length: 5, , 0 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): (1) 10.2,1
Well Diameter: z 4, s, 8
Total Volume Purgecl l ' rt L-
Casing Type: V , Steel
Purge Rate: %, mL/min
Sampling Device: Re �1;, Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point: r. ,T.pofC itlg other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.): .,n,(-
Color: Odor: Yes, 69
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
Cl
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria2
�,n L_
(gallons)
(see note
below)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 mV
+/-
10%4
1?
T41
py
fl
I
1
('
ilrZ
�'
V
—
/.
J
0,
2
r-ill
IJ2
(
01,10
�
v
j
a
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro /
Official Sampling Date & Time: i0 r �0 / 5-!-:—) Z�j
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010D HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 — 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540C 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1)-Do not measure depth to bottom of well unld after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that maybe resting on the well bottom.
(2) -Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3) -Total drav,dovn in well to be less than 0.1 in (0.32 It). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep dravedown below 0.1 an (0.32 ft).
(4)+/- M when turbidity is over 10 NTUs.
(5) Well Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
(6) - DO h not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7)- ORP is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
- ,lJ,
ERM
Site Name; Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other) M �✓
Sample ID: MW -Olt _69
Date: — Z
Time: '
Sampling Personnel (circle one): Amanda
rr _ _ Andrew Jaskowiak
Weather Conditions (circle one): unny, artly Cil ud , Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, Stick Up Completion Well Tag Present: e0s, No
Well Locked: Q, No Lock Present: 66, No Well ID info on Tag: No
Well Bolted: es, Q Well Cap: e , No
Well -Cap Condition• o , Replace, Other:
Well Pad CondltiorVdooCracked, Replace, Other:
Well Locatlo ' Gra , Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (T.D.): 2-
Screen Length: 5, 16, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): (1)11-50
Well Diameter: 4, s, s
Total Volume Purged:
Casing Type: C Steel
Purge Rate: IOU mL/min
Sampling Device: /feristAtic, Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point: op of Iasi other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.): 115
Color: M a Odor: Yes,
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
Cc)
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria2
wq,
(gallons)
(see note
below)'
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 my
+/-
10%4
(1-44,
N 3 .
. t-4
C,3, q
2
4
atB,
0.55
a.
0
oo
of
o
1000
,
voo
U.
^(P
ti
r 8
i U
1 �
I •O
.5
U
1-1-0
)
v
vo
i
T. 0
v
Field Parameters measured with:
YSI Pro /
Official Sampling Date & Time: /1(9�%61 ?) / I01 J
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010D HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 — 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540C — 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
0)- Do not measure depth to bottom of well until after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that maybe resting on the well bottom.
(2) -Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3)- Total drawdown in well to be less than 0.1 m (0.32 it). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep drawdown below 0.1 m (0.32 ft).
(4) +1-10%when turbidity Is over 10 NTUs.
(5) Well Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
(6) - DO Is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling' SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7) - ORP is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
We
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other) M
Sample ID: V/ - 0,5 ►Z
(�
Date:
Time:
Sampling Personnel (circle one):
manda En
Andrew Jaskowiak
Weather Conditions (circle one):
unny, Partly Cloudy,
loud Rain, Other
Well Type: Flush Surface CO-P I., Stick Up Completion
Well Tag Present: No
Well Locked: es o Lock Present: 4V No
Well ID info on Tag: e , No
Well Bolted; No Well Cap:
&esj No
Well Cap Condition: Dod, eplace, Other:
Well Pad Condition: �!&-b,Woods,
cked, Repla
, Other:
Well Location: Grass, Asphal Concre Other:
Additional Comments: Nk
Total Depth of Well (T.D.): 5 -(ea
Screen Length: fin 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): (1) Cr3
Well Diameter: 6, 8
Total Volume Purged:
Casing Type: , Steel
-
Purge Rate: mum -in
Sampling Device: CjFer , Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point: eop, of Ca-4,g other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.):
Color: Odor: Yes,
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
(eC)
pH
std units
SpC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria2
mL
(see note
below)'
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 mV
+/-
10%4
i
I
,io
l.�
•2
5•
t
-Olt
iq
I,b
ZI
-K
0.0
1.o
O
Z
� •
• LU
o o
�
a
e
2•
1"6.5
I OU
o
22
5.o
Z..o}
-
-
IT A�L
1015
-5(J
o.o
.I
o
1.
,
,V3
0.1'
Af
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro/
Official Sampling Date & Time: 5/ J Z_()Z3/ I L 5S_
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010D HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 - 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540C - 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1) -Do not measure depth to bottom of well until after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that maybe resting on the well bottom.
(2)-Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3)-Total drawdown in well to be less than 0.1 in (0.32 it). Purging rate to be Iowered as necessary to keep dravdovm below 0.1 in (0.32 it).
(4) i/-10%when turbidity Is over 10 NTUs.
(5) Well Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
(6)- DO Is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7)-ORP Is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundvater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
i'
ERM
Site Name; Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other)
Sample ID: //t1 1 -- O 6-4
Date.
Time: ,
Sampling Personnel (circle one): Amanda Farr
Andrew Jasko ak
Weather Conditions (circle one): Sunny, Partly Cloudy,
: loud), Rain, Other
Well Type: F sh -face Completion, Stick Up Completion
Well Tag Present: es No
Well Locke :, Y , No Lock Present: es, No
Well ID info on Tag: Y;�s J No
Well Bolted. Yes, No Well Cap: 46- ' o
Well Cap Condition: good Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition: cod, racked, Replace, Other:
Well Locatiop. Grasp, Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Commen'ts:'�
_.
Total Depth of Well (T.D.):
Screen Length: 5, , 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): (1)
Well Diameter: 4, 8, 8
Total Volume Purged: Iiij fn L
Casing Type: VC Steel
Purge Rate: mUmin
Sampling Device: erista1y , Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point: { op of Casing other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.): Q
Color: '\ Odor: Yes,
Time:
min
Volume
P r ed
DTW:
feet
Temp
(eC)
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria2
(ga ns)
(see note
be,OW)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 my
+/-
10%4
i—l2- 1
4 d
1q. I
tJ 0
4201L
1
t TLf
7ao
t
�,�
121z
0
o
P
1
-J
t
q
21 Oir
2,TX
1
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro /
Official Sampling Date & Time: 6
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative:
Metals 6010D HNO3
Sulfate
TDS
300
2540C
Hold Time (days): Lab:
28 Pace Analytical
28 Pace Analytical
7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1) - Do not measure depth to bottom of well untB after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that maybe resting on the well bottom.
(2) - Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3)-Total dravdovm in well to be less than 0.1 m (0.32 ft). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep dravedmm below0.1 an (0.32 fit).
(4)+/-10%vrhen turbidity Is over 10 NTUs.
(5) Welt Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
(6)-DO Is not a stabilization criterion for the "Grovrc Na(er sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7) - ORP is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling' SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
kirj� ��
ERM
Site Name; Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (lWoniWr W11 , DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other) G - -
Sample ID: l ._ '- L- -
Date: -- j- 2,
Time: <
Sampling Personnel (circle one): Amanda Farr
Andrew Jasko a
Weather Conditions (circle one): C
artly, dy,
Clqud Rain, Other
,,.
,--Sunny,
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, ;_t6 ick Up Coypletion
Well Tag Present: Ye , No
Well Locked: ,X No Lock Present: e , No
Well ID info on Tag: No
Well Bolted: Yes, iRp Well Cap:.. e , No
Well Cap Condition: o W, Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition:(dooq Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Location: ` ra ??Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (T.D.): 1
Screen Length: 5, .10 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): (1)
Well Diameter: r2 4, 6, 8
Total Volume Purged:02i2
Casing Type: v ,steel
Purge Rate: 1� mL/min
Sampling Device: `Ke ista Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point: rT p of Cas6b other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.):
Color: ( __.. Odor: Yes, o
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
CC)
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria2
�-j L,.
(gallons)
(see note
belOW)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 my
+/-
10%4
wry
� `
C
-, G `
F7
'�
-01✓
/,
6-1
�' '
/
o
-i
. l r
-2
'
`�71s
7
Z
14t
10
7 ci
2
yr
2
4,2.�724
0
q
l5I
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro /
Official Sampling Date & Time:
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010D HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 — 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540c — 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1) - Do net measure depth to bottom of well until after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that maybe resting on the well bottom.
(2)-Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3) - Total drandovm in vmll to be less than 0.1 m (0.32 fl). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep dray.Hovm below0.1 m (0.32 it).
(4)+1- 10%vfisn turbidity Is over 10 NTUa.
(5) Well Valwas (gal) = 0.041d2h:
(6) - DO Is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7) - ORP is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwter sampling" SESD Standard operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
t
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other) mori 1 40y- k/cm
Sample ID: MO -Of -
Date: Cj O `j
Time:
Sampling Personnel (circle one): Amanda Farr ---Andrew
Jaskowiak
Weather Conditions (circle one): Sunny, Partly Cloudy,
Iou�,7Rain, Other
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, Stick Up Completion
Well Tag Present: QK l )No
Well Locked: (Ye ,) No Lock Present: No
Well ID info on Tag: es, No
Well Bolted: Yes,)No Well Cap: es�'No
Well Cap Condition: 600d, Replace, Other:
Well Pad Cond'Itio ood, Packed, Replace, Other:
Well Location: Grass, Asphalt, Concrete, oods Other:
Additional Commen s:
Total Depth of Well (T.D.): j (j •
Screen Length: 5, 1 ; 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): (1)
Well Diameter: a 4, 6, 8
Total Volume Purged:
Casing Type: V i teel
Purge Rate: 1 Q mUmin
Sampling Device:. jstalti , Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point:-G--rrg other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.):
Color: tiNc Odor: Yes, No
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
(eC)
pH
(std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria2
fq�
(gallons)
(see note
belOW)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 my
+/-
10p4
CCU
3 .
5
ZCD 6
49
el Z 1
-
0
2.
2-12-11
1000_
94,41
Z'Zci
00,2
It
�Z
,5
q
:�
to
o✓
0
0
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro/
Official Sampling Date & Time: � /A %%2 3 / 2 qS 04
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010D HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 — 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540C — 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1)- Do not measure depth to bottom of well until after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that maybe resting on the well bottom.
(2)-Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3)-Total dray.dovm In well to be less then 0.1 m (0.32 (1). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep drawdown below0.1 m (0.32 it).
(4)+1-10%when turbidity Is over 10 NTUs.
(5) Well Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
(6) - DO Is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7)- ORP in not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
kbti .i
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other)
Sample ID: fYj I--- (J 0 ' ,,21;2- r
Date: —
Time: ' r
Sampling Personnel (circle one): Amanda Farr
And skowiak
Weather Conditions (circle one): Sunny, Partly Cloudy,
Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, S (k Completion
Well Tag Present: ,,,Y¢�, No
Well Locked: . No Lock Pres nt: No
Well ID info on Tag: "e , No
Well Bolted: Yes, o Well Cap: Yes,
Well Cap Condition: o , Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition' Goo , Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well LocationrGra;ls, Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Commenf5'
`-
99
Total Depth of Well (T.D.): I f.
Screen Length: 5, 0, 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): (1)
Well Diameter: 0 a, s, s
Total Volume Purged:
Casing Type: W v steel
Purge Rate: �7 mL/min
Sampling Device: p rista ic, Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point: p of Casing other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.): 11 fj-,
Color:. dor: Yes, Mo
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
(eC)
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria2
(gallons)
(see note
belOW)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 my
+/-
10%4
( >
2
-, "
V
:o
. i
_ j'
/1
Z42.h.
f0,2-,'
% -
.,
12
J/442
�
i23//
-) d
yy
r/� F y
/I}
9
l
Of
nab
IA
g
AL
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro /
Official Sampling Date & Time: )-1U "- 2?/
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010D HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 — 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540c — 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1) - Do not measure depth to bottom dwell md, after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that may be resting on the well bottom.
(2)- Stabii'¢alion r0cda based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3) - Total dr-down in veall to be less than 0.1 m (0.32 0), Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep dravdmm below 0.1 on (0.32 fl).
(4) +/- 10%when turbidity is over 10 NTUa.
(s) Well
Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
(6) -Do
Is not a stabil¢ation criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7)-ORP is not a stabil¢atlon criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
I
ERM
Site Name; Swift Creek ERM Projerct Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other)
Sample ID: S1W -01 -,'
Date: VZ16i ZOV5
Time:
Sampling Personnel (circle one):
Amanda Far
Andrew Jaskowiak
Weather Conditions (circle one):
Surlpy, artly Clo y, Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well Type: Flu Surface Completion, Sti
p Completion
Well Tag Pr sent: Ye , No
Well Locked: Yes, No Loc esent: Yes, No
Well ID info o Ta Yes, No
Well Bolted: Yes, No :
Yes, No
Well Cap Con n: Good, Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition: G Cracked, Replace, O
Well Locat' :Grass, halt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comm ts: lea
r,
Total Depth of Well (T.D.).
Screen Length: 5, 10, 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): 11)
Well Diameter: 2, 4, s, 8
Total Volume Purged: v
Casing Type: PVC, Steel
Purge Rate: L/min
Sampling Device: Peristaltic, Monsoon, Grundfo Baile Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point: Top of casing other:
Pump Intake (ft below M. .):
Color: Odor: Yes, o
Time:
min
Volum
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
(eC)
pH
std units)
SPC
(uSkm)
DO
(m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria"
(gallons)
(see note
belO4
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 mV
+/-
10%4
-� •
(]
. d
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro /
Official Sampling Date & Time: j -ZS- w2 � / 2 : N T
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010D HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 — 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540C — 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1)-Do not measure depth to bottom of well until after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that maybe resting on the well bottom.
(2)-Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3) - Total drawdown in well to be less than 0.1 m (0.32 ti). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep drawdown below 0.1 in(0.32 it).
o .1-10%when turbidly is over 10 NTUs.
(5) Well Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
(6) - DO Is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling"SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7) - ORP Is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling' SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other) %L- 2
Sample ID: 5t -02 -- 61 t -- ""-
Date: �-2- ,
Time: 1
Sampling Personnel (circle one): Amanda Farr
Arew Jas i
Weather Conditions (circle one): Sunny, rtly Clo dy, Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, Stick Up Completion
Well Tag Present: Yes, No
Well Locked: Yes, No Lock Present: Yes, No
Well ID info on Tag: Yes, No
Well Bolted: Yes, No Well Cap: Yes, No
Well Cap Condition: Good, Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition: Good, Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Location: Grass, Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments: 1c,-•,C e-c-
Total Depth of Well (T.D.):
Screen Length: 5, 10, 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): t1)
Well Diameter: 2, 4, s, 8
Total Volume Purged:
Casing Type: PVC,:I
Purge Rate: mL/min
Sampling Device %Peristaltic Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point: To asing other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.):
Color: Odor: Yes, 19D
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
CC)
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria2
(gallons)
(see note
belOW)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 mV
+/-
10%4
Field Parameters measured with:
Official Sampling Date & Time:l,`(� / z
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010D HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 — 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540C — 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1) - Do not measure depth to bottom of well unll after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that may be resting on the well bottom,
(2)-Sta lhzation criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3) - Total dravdovm In well to be less than 0.1 m (0.32 fit). Purging rate to be evvered as necessary to keep dravvdown below0.1 m (0.32 it).
(4) +1- 10%efien turbidity Is over 10 NTUs.
(5) We If Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
(6) - DO Is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundvrater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7)-ORP is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundviater sampling' SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION EFFECTIVENESS REPORT — MAY 2023
/_\» =1 ►11] e\ ZtAb . I7_VA C_1
May 2023
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
June 13, 2023
Chris Means
ERM
300 West Summit Ave
Suite 330
Charlotte, NC 28203
RE: Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
Dear Chris Means:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on May 27, 2023. The results relate only to the
samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the applicable TNI/NELAC Standards and the
laboratory's Quality Manual, where applicable, unless otherwise noted in the body of the report.
The test results provided in this final report were generated by each of the following laboratories within the Pace Network:
• Pace Analytical Services - Asheville
• Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Matthew Brainard
[e-mail]
[phone]
Project Manager
Enclosures
cc: EDDs, Reports, ERM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 1 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
Pace Analytical Services Asheville
2225 Riverside Drive, Asheville, NC 28804
Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87648
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37712
North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 40
Pace Analytical Services Peachtree Corners
110 Technology Pkwy, Peachtree Corners, GA 30092
Florida DOH Certification #: E87315
Georgia DW Inorganics Certification #: 812
CERTIFICATIONS
South Carolina Laboratory ID: 99030
South Carolina Certification #: 99030001
Virginia/VELAP Certification #: 460222
North Carolina Certification #: 381
South Carolina Certification #: 98011001
Virginia Certification #: 460204
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 2 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
Lab ID
Sample ID
Matrix
Date Collected
Date Received
92669674001
MW-0IS-WG-20230526
Water
05/26/2311:25
05/27/23 11:53
92669674002
MW-01 D-WG-20230526
Water
05/26/23 12:55
05/27/23 11:53
92669674003
MW-02S-WG-20230526
Water
05/26/2312:55
05/27/23 11:53
92669674004
MW-02D-WG-20230526
Water
05/26/2311:45
05/27/23 11:53
92669674005
MW-03-WG-20230526
Water
05/26/2310:40
05/27/23 11:53
92669674006
MW-04-WG-20230526
Water
05/26/2310:15
05/27/23 11:53
92669674007
MW-05RS-WG-20230525
Water
05/25/2312:50
05/27/23 11:53
92669674008
MW-05RD-WG-20230525
Water
05/25/2312:55
05/27/23 11:53
92669674009
MW-06-WG-20230526
Water
05/26/23 08:50
05/27/23 11:53
92669674010
MW-07-WG-20230526
Water
05/26/2314:45
05/27/23 11:53
92669674011
MW-08-WG-20230526
Water
05/26/2315:15
05/27/23 11:53
92669674012
SW-01-WG-20230525
Water
05/25/2314:47
05/27/23 11:53
92669674013
SW-02-WG-20230526
Water
05/26/2313:40
05/27/23 11:53
92669674014
FD-01-WG-20230526
Water
05/26/23 00:00
05/27/23 11:53
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 3 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Project:
Pace Project No.:
SWIFT CREEK
92669674
Analytes
Lab lD
Sample ID
Method
Analysts
Reported
Laboratory
92669674001
MW-01S-WG-20230526
EPA 6010D
MS
7
PASI-GA
EPA 7470A
VB
1
PASI-GA
SM 2540C-2015
JMH1
1
PASI-A
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
JCM
1
PASI-A
92669674002
MW-01D-WG-20230526
EPA 6010D
MS
7
PASI-GA
EPA 7470A
VB
1
PASI-GA
SM 2540C-2015
JMH1
1
PASI-A
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
JCM
1
PASI-A
92669674003
MW-02S-WG-20230526
EPA 6010D
MS
7
PASI-GA
EPA 7470A
VB
1
PASI-GA
SM 2540C-2015
JMH1
1
PASI-A
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
JCM
1
PASI-A
92669674004
MW-02D-WG-20230526
EPA 6010D
MS
7
PASI-GA
EPA 7470A
VB
1
PASI-GA
SM 2540C-2015
JMH1
1
PASI-A
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
JCM
1
PASI-A
92669674005
MW-03-WG-20230526
EPA 6010D
MS
7
PASI-GA
EPA 7470A
VB
1
PASI-GA
SM 2540C-2015
JMH1
1
PASI-A
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
JCM
1
PASI-A
92669674006
MW-04-WG-20230526
EPA 6010D
MS
7
PASI-GA
EPA 7470A
VB
1
PASI-GA
SM 2540C-2015
JMH1
1
PASI-A
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
JCM
1
PASI-A
92669674007
MW-05RS-WG-20230525
EPA 6010D
MS
7
PASI-GA
EPA 7470A
VB
1
PASI-GA
SM 2540C-2015
JMH1
1
PASI-A
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
JCM
1
PASI-A
92669674008
MW-05RD-WG-20230525
EPA 6010D
MS
7
PASI-GA
EPA 7470A
VB
1
PASI-GA
SM 2540C-2015
JMH1
1
PASI-A
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
JCM
1
PASI-A
92669674009
MW-06-WG-20230526
EPA 6010D
MS
7
PASI-GA
EPA 7470A
VB
1
PASI-GA
SM 2540C-2015
JMH1
1
PASI-A
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
JCM
1
PASI-A
92669674010
MW-07-WG-20230526
EPA 6010D
MS
7
PASI-GA
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 4 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Project:
SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.:
92669674
Analytes
Lab lD
Sample ID
Method
Analysts
Reported
Laboratory
EPA 7470A
VB
1
PASI-GA
SM 2540C-2015
JMH1
1
PASI-A
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
JCM
1
PASI-A
92669674011
MW-08-WG-20230526
EPA 6010D
MS
7
PASI-GA
EPA 7470A
VB
1
PASI-GA
SM 2540C-2015
JMH1
1
PASI-A
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
JCM
1
PASI-A
92669674012
SW-01-WG-20230525
EPA 6010D
MS
7
PASI-GA
EPA 7470A
VB
1
PASI-GA
SM 2540C-2015
JMH1
1
PASI-A
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
JCM
1
PASI-A
92669674013
SW-02-WG-20230526
EPA 6010D
MS
7
PASI-GA
EPA 7470A
VB
1
PASI-GA
SM 2540C-2015
JMH1
1
PASI-A
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
JCM
1
PASI-A
92669674014
FD-01-WG-20230526
EPA 6010D
MS
7
PASI-GA
EPA 7470A
VB
1
PASI-GA
SM 2540C-2015
JMH1
1
PASI-A
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
JCM
1
PASI-A
PASI-A = Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
PASI-GA = Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 5 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
Sample: MW-01S-WG-20230526
Parameters
Lab ID: 92669674001 Collected: 05/26/23 11:25
Report
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Received: 05/27/23 11:53 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
6010D ATL ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 601 OD Preparation Method: EPA 3010A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Arsenic
ND ug/L 30.0 26.2
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 16:25
7440-38-2
Barium
104 ug/L 10.0 1.3
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 16:25
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 10.0 2.7
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 16:25
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 10.0 3.6
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 16:25
7440-47-3
Silver
ND ug/L 10.0 4.6
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 16:25
7440-22-4
Lead
ND ug/L 25.0 8.1
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 16:25
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 40.0 31.1
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 16:25
7782-49-2
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470A Preparation Method: EPA 7470A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.13
1
06/08/2313:30
06/08/2315:49
7439-97-6
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540C-2015
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Total Dissolved Solids
4320 mg/L 312 312
1
05/31/23 11:45
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
622 mg/L 12.0 6.0
12
06/01/23 06:26
14808-79-8
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 6 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
Sample: MW-01D-WG-20230526
Parameters
Lab ID: 92669674002 Collected: 05/26/23 12:55
Report
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Received: 05/27/23 11:53 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
6010D ATL ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 601 OD Preparation Method: EPA 3010A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Arsenic
ND ug/L 30.0 26.2
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:18
7440-38-2
Barium
600 ug/L 10.0 1.3
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:18
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 10.0 2.7
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:18
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 10.0 3.6
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:18
7440-47-3
Silver
ND ug/L 10.0 4.6
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:18
7440-22-4
Lead
ND ug/L 25.0 8.1
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:18
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 40.0 31.1
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:18
7782-49-2
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470A Preparation Method: EPA 7470A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.13
1
06/08/2313:30
06/08/2316:05
7439-97-6
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540C-2015
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Total Dissolved Solids
880 mg/L 50.0 50.0
1
05/31/23 11:45
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
17.6 mg/L 1.0 0.50
1
06/01/23 06:13
14808-79-8
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 7 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
Sample: MW-02S-WG-20230526
Parameters
Lab ID: 92669674003 Collected: 05/26/23 12:55
Report
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Received: 05/27/23 11:53 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
6010D ATL ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 601 OD Preparation Method: EPA 3010A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Arsenic
ND ug/L 30.0 26.2
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:12
7440-38-2
Barium
114 ug/L 10.0 1.3
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:12
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 10.0 2.7
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:12
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 10.0 3.6
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:12
7440-47-3
Silver
ND ug/L 10.0 4.6
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:12
7440-22-4
Lead
ND ug/L 25.0 8.1
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:12
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 40.0 31.1
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:12
7782-49-2
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470A Preparation Method: EPA 7470A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.13
1
06/08/2313:30
06/08/2316:08
7439-97-6
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540C-2015
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Total Dissolved Solids
211 mg/L 25.0 25.0
1
05/31/23 11:45
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
ND mg/L 1.0 0.50
1
05/31/2316:35
14808-79-8
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 8 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
Sample: MW-02D-WG-20230526
Parameters
Lab ID: 92669674004 Collected: 05/26/23 11:45
Report
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Received: 05/27/23 11:53 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
6010D ATL ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 601 OD Preparation Method: EPA 3010A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Arsenic
ND ug/L 30.0 26.2
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:32
7440-38-2
Barium
271 ug/L 10.0 1.3
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:32
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 10.0 2.7
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:32
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 10.0 3.6
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:32
7440-47-3
Silver
ND ug/L 10.0 4.6
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:32
7440-22-4
Lead
ND ug/L 25.0 8.1
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:32
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 40.0 31.1
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:32
7782-49-2
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470A Preparation Method: EPA 7470A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.13
1
06/08/2313:30
06/08/2316:10
7439-97-6
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540C-2015
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Total Dissolved Solids
317 mg/L 25.0 25.0
1
05/31/23 11:45
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
1.8 mg/L 1.0 0.50
1
05/31/2319:30
14808-79-8
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 9 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
Sample: MW-03-WG-20230526
Parameters
Lab ID: 92669674005 Collected: 05/26/23 10:40
Report
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Received: 05/27/23 11:53 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
6010D ATL ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 601 OD Preparation Method: EPA 3010A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Arsenic
ND ug/L 30.0 26.2
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:23
7440-38-2
Barium
39.8 ug/L 10.0 1.3
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:23
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 10.0 2.7
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:23
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 10.0 3.6
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:23
7440-47-3
Silver
ND ug/L 10.0 4.6
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:23
7440-22-4
Lead
11.1J ug/L 25.0 8.1
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:23
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 40.0 31.1
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:23
7782-49-2
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470A Preparation Method: EPA 7470A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.13
1
06/08/2313:30
06/08/2316:13
7439-97-6
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540C-2015
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Total Dissolved Solids
890 mg/L 50.0 50.0
1
05/31/23 11:45
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
251 mg/L 5.0 2.5
5
06/01/23 01:45
14808-79-8
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 10 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
Sample: MW-04-WG-20230526
Parameters
Lab ID: 92669674006 Collected: 05/26/23 10:15
Report
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Received: 05/27/23 11:53 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
6010D ATL ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 601 OD Preparation Method: EPA 3010A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Arsenic
ND ug/L 30.0 26.2
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:36
7440-38-2
Barium
65.7 ug/L 10.0 1.3
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:36
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 10.0 2.7
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:36
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 10.0 3.6
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:36
7440-47-3
Silver
ND ug/L 10.0 4.6
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:36
7440-22-4
Lead
ND ug/L 25.0 8.1
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:36
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 40.0 31.1
1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:36
7782-49-2
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470A Preparation Method: EPA 7470A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.13
1
06/08/2313:30
06/08/2316:15
7439-97-6
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540C-2015
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Total Dissolved Solids
266 mg/L 25.0 25.0
1
05/31/23 11:45
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
17.4 mg/L 1.0 0.50
1
05/31/23 20:50
14808-79-8
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 11 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
Sample: MW-05RS-WG-20230525
Parameters
Lab ID: 92669674007 Collected: 05/25/23 12:50
Report
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Received: 05/27/23 11:53 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
6010D ATL ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 601 OD Preparation Method: EPA 3010A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Arsenic
ND ug/L 30.0 26.2
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:28
7440-38-2
Barium
84.4 ug/L 10.0 1.3
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:28
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 10.0 2.7
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:28
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 10.0 3.6
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:28
7440-47-3
Silver
ND ug/L 10.0 4.6
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:28
7440-22-4
Lead
ND ug/L 25.0 8.1
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:28
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 40.0 31.1
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:28
7782-49-2
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470A Preparation Method: EPA 7470A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.13
1
06/08/2313:30
06/08/2316:18
7439-97-6
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540C-2015
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Total Dissolved Solids
249 mg/L 25.0 25.0
1
05/31/23 11:42
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
3.2 mg/L 1.0 0.50
1
05/31/23 21:06
14808-79-8
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 12 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
Sample: MW-05RD-WG-20230525
Parameters
Lab ID: 92669674008 Collected: 05/25/23 12:55
Report
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Received: 05/27/23 11:53 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
6010D ATL ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 601 OD Preparation Method: EPA 3010A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Arsenic
ND ug/L 30.0 26.2
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:33
7440-38-2
Barium
143 ug/L 10.0 1.3
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:33
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 10.0 2.7
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:33
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 10.0 3.6
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:33
7440-47-3
Silver
ND ug/L 10.0 4.6
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:33
7440-22-4
Lead
ND ug/L 25.0 8.1
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:33
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 40.0 31.1
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:33
7782-49-2
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470A Preparation Method: EPA 7470A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.13
1
06/08/2313:30
06/08/2316:21
7439-97-6
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540C-2015
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Total Dissolved Solids
183 mg/L 25.0 25.0
1
05/31/23 11:43
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
8.2 mg/L 1.0 0.50
1
05/31/23 21:54
14808-79-8
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 13 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
Sample: MW-06-WG-20230526
Lab ID: 92669674009 Collected: 05/26/23 08:50
Received: 05/27/23 11:53 Matrix: Water
Report
Parameters
Results Units Limit MDL
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
6010D ATL ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 601 OD Preparation Method: EPA 3010A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Arsenic
46.1 ug/L 30.0 26.2
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:38
7440-38-2
Barium
65.6 ug/L 10.0 1.3
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:38
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 10.0 2.7
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:38
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 10.0 3.6
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:38
7440-47-3
Silver
ND ug/L 50.0 23.2
5
06/06/23 09:53
06/07/23 13:48
7440-22-4 D3
Lead
73.2 ug/L 25.0 8.1
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:38
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 200 156
5
06/06/23 09:53
06/07/23 13:48
7782-49-2 D3
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470A Preparation Method: EPA 7470A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.13
1
06/08/2313:30
06/08/2316:23
7439-97-6
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540C-2015
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Total Dissolved Solids
6750 mg/L 417 417
1
05/31/23 11:46
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
569 mg/L 12.0 6.0
12
06/01/23 02:01
14808-79-8
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 14 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
Sample: MW-07-WG-20230526
Lab ID: 92669674010 Collected: 05/26/23 14:45
Received: 05/27/23 11:53 Matrix: Water
Report
Parameters
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
6010D ATL ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 601 OD Preparation Method: EPA 3010A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Arsenic
63.7 ug/L 30.0 26.2 1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:43
7440-38-2
Barium
87.4 ug/L 10.0 1.3 1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:43
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 10.0 2.7 1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:43
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 10.0 3.6 1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:43
7440-47-3
Silver
ND ug/L 50.0 23.2 5
06/06/23 09:53
06/07/23 13:53
7440-22-4 D3
Lead
185 ug/L 25.0 8.1 1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:43
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 200 156 5
06/06/23 09:53
06/07/23 13:53
7782-49-2 D3
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470A Preparation Method: EPA 7470A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.13 1
06/08/2313:30
06/08/2316:26
7439-97-6
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540C-2015
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Total Dissolved Solids
10700 mg/L 625 625 1
05/31/23 11:46
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
565 mg/L 20.0 10.0 20
06/01/2316:06
14808-79-8
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 15 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
Sample: MW-08-WG-20230526
Lab ID: 92669674011 Collected: 05/26/23 15:15
Received: 05/27/23 11:53 Matrix: Water
Report
Parameters
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
6010D ATL ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 601 OD Preparation Method: EPA 3010A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Arsenic
59.8 ug/L 30.0 26.2 1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:41
7440-38-2
Barium
106 ug/L 10.0 1.3 1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:41
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 10.0 2.7 1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:41
7440-43-9
Chromium
4.3J ug/L 10.0 3.6 1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:41
7440-47-3
Silver
ND ug/L 50.0 23.2 5
06/07/23 09:30
06/09/23 13:50
7440-22-4 D3
Lead
148 ug/L 25.0 8.1 1
06/07/23 09:30
06/08/23 21:41
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 400 311 10
06/07/23 09:30
06/12/23 12:24
7782-49-2 D3
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470A Preparation Method: EPA 7470A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.13 1
06/08/2313:30
06/08/2316:34
7439-97-6
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540C-2015
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Total Dissolved Solids
8400 mg/L 500 500 1
05/31/23 11:46
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
541 mg/L 10.0 5.0 10
06/01/23 02:53
14808-79-8
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 16 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
Sample: SW-01-WG-20230525
Parameters
Lab ID: 92669674012 Collected: 05/25/23 14:47
Report
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Received: 05/27/23 11:53 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
6010D ATL ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 601 OD Preparation Method: EPA 3010A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Arsenic
ND ug/L 30.0 26.2
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:48
7440-38-2
Barium
37.6 ug/L 10.0 1.3
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:48
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 10.0 2.7
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:48
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 10.0 3.6
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:48
7440-47-3
Silver
ND ug/L 10.0 4.6
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:48
7440-22-4
Lead
ND ug/L 25.0 8.1
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:48
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 40.0 31.1
1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:48
7782-49-2
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470A Preparation Method: EPA 7470A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.13
1
06/08/2313:30
06/08/2316:36
7439-97-6
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540C-2015
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Total Dissolved Solids
76.0 mg/L 25.0 25.0
1
05/31/23 11:43
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
6.0 mg/L 1.0 0.50
1
05/31/23 22:58
14808-79-8
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 17 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
Sample: SW-02-WG-20230526
Lab ID: 92669674013 Collected: 05/26/23 13:40
Received: 05/27/23 11:53 Matrix: Water
Report
Parameters
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
6010D ATL ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 601 OD Preparation Method: EPA 3010A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Arsenic
ND ug/L 30.0 26.2 1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:53
7440-38-2
Barium
25.6 ug/L 10.0 1.3 1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:53
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 10.0 2.7 1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:53
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 10.0 3.6 1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:53
7440-47-3
Silver
ND ug/L 10.0 4.6 1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:53
7440-22-4
Lead
ND ug/L 25.0 8.1 1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:53
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 40.0 31.1 1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:53
7782-49-2
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470A Preparation Method: EPA 7470A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.13 1
06/08/2313:30
06/08/2316:39
7439-97-6
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540C-2015
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Total Dissolved Solids
164 mg/L 25.0 25.0 1
05/31/23 11:46
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
65.2 mg/L 10.0 5.0 10
05/31/23 23:14
14808-79-8 M1
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 18 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
Sample: FD-01-WG-20230526
Parameters
Lab ID: 92669674014 Collected: 05/26/23 00:00
Report
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Received: 05/27/23 11:53 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
6010D ATL ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010D Preparation Method: EPA 3010A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Arsenic
ND ug/L 30.0 26.2 1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:58
7440-38-2
Barium
111 ug/L 10.0 1.3 1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:58
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 10.0 2.7 1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:58
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 10.0 3.6 1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:58
7440-47-3
Silver
ND ug/L 10.0 4.6 1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:58
7440-22-4
Lead
ND ug/L 25.0 8.1 1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:58
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 40.0 31.1 1
06/06/23 09:53
06/06/23 18:58
7782-49-2
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470A Preparation Method: EPA 7470A
Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.13 1
06/08/2313:30
06/08/2316:42
7439-97-6
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540C-2015
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Total Dissolved Solids
4420 mg/L 312 312 1
05/31/23 11:46
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
654 mg/L 10.0 5.0 10
06/01/23 01:30
14808-79-8
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 19 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
QC Batch: 778690 Analysis Method: EPA 6010D
QC Batch Method: EPA 3010A Analysis Description: 601 OD ATL
Laboratory: Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Associated Lab Samples: 92669674001, 92669674002, 92669674005, 92669674007, 92669674008, 92669674009, 92669674010,
92669674012,92669674013,92669674014
METHOD BLANK: 4039223
Matrix:
Water
Associated Lab Samples:
92669674001, 92669674002, 92669674005, 92669674007, 92669674008, 92669674009, 92669674010,
92669674012,92669674013,92669674014
Blank
Reporting
Parameter
Units
Result
Limit
MDL
Analyzed Qualifiers
Arsenic
ug/L
ND
30.0
26.2
06/06/2316:15
Barium
ug/L
ND
10.0
1.3
06/06/2316:15
Cadmium
ug/L
ND
10.0
2.7
06/06/2316:15
Chromium
ug/L
ND
10.0
3.6
06/06/2316:15
Lead
ug/L
ND
25.0
8.1
06/06/2316:15
Selenium
ug/L
ND
40.0
31.1
06/06/2316:15
Silver
ug/L
ND
10.0
4.6
06/06/2316:15
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
Parameter
4039224
Units
Spike
Conc.
LCS
Result
LCS
% Rec
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Arsenic
ug/L
1000
929
93
80-120
Barium
ug/L
1000
952
95
80-120
Cadmium
ug/L
1000
951
95
80-120
Chromium
ug/L
1000
969
97
80-120
Lead
ug/L
1000
953
95
80-120
Selenium
ug/L
1000
961
96
80-120
Silver
ug/L
1000
980
98
80-120
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 4039225
4039226
MS
MSD
92669674001
Spike
Spike
MS
MSD
MS
MSD
% Rec
Max
Parameter
Units
Result
Conc.
Conc.
Result
Result
% Rec
% Rec
Limits
RPD
RPD Qual
Arsenic
ug/L
ND
1000
1000
939
965
94
97
75-125
3
20
Barium
ug/L
104
1000
1000
926
963
82
86
75-125
4
20
Cadmium
ug/L
ND
1000
1000
920
945
92
95
75-125
3
20
Chromium
ug/L
ND
1000
1000
873
896
87
90
75-125
3
20
Lead
ug/L
ND
1000
1000
901
928
90
93
75-125
3
20
Selenium
ug/L
ND
1000
1000
948
972
95
97
75-125
3
20
Silver
ug/L
ND
1000
1000
957
974
96
97
75-125
2
20
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 20 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
QC Batch: 778886 Analysis Method: EPA 6010D
QC Batch Method: EPA 3010A Analysis Description: 601 OD ATL
Laboratory: Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Associated Lab Samples: 92669674003, 92669674004, 92669674006, 92669674011
METHOD BLANK: 4040245
Matrix:
Water
Associated Lab Samples:
92669674003, 92669674004, 92669674006, 92669674011
Blank
Reporting
Parameter
Units
Result
Limit
MDL
Analyzed Qualifiers
Arsenic
ug/L
ND
30.0
26.2
06/08/23 20:52
Barium
ug/L
ND
10.0
1.3
06/08/23 20:52
Cadmium
ug/L
ND
10.0
2.7
06/08/23 20:52
Chromium
ug/L
ND
10.0
3.6
06/08/23 20:52
Lead
ug/L
ND
25.0
8.1
06/08/23 20:52
Selenium
ug/L
ND
40.0
31.1
06/08/23 20:52
Silver
ug/L
ND
10.0
4.6
06/08/23 20:52
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 4040246
Spike
LCS
LCS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc.
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Arsenic
ug/L
1000
1090
109
80-120
Barium
ug/L
1000
1020
102
80-120
Cadmium
ug/L
1000
1110
111
80-120
Chromium
ug/L
1000
1050
105
80-120
Lead
ug/L
1000
1070
107
80-120
Selenium
ug/L
1000
1040
104
80-120
Silver
ug/L
1000
983
98
80-120
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 4040247
4040248
MS
MSD
92669674003
Spike
Spike
MS
MSD
MS
MSD
% Rec
Max
Parameter
Units
Result
Conc.
Conc.
Result
Result
% Rec
% Rec
Limits
RPD
RPD Qual
Arsenic
ug/L
ND
1000
1000
983
1050
98
105
75-125
7
20
Barium
ug/L
114
1000
1000
1020
1080
90
97
75-125
6
20
Cadmium
ug/L
ND
1000
1000
989
1060
99
106
75-125
7
20
Chromium
ug/L
ND
1000
1000
936
1010
94
101
75-125
7
20
Lead
ug/L
ND
1000
1000
965
1040
96
103
75-125
8
20
Selenium
ug/L
ND
1000
1000
934
1000
93
100
75-125
7
20
Silver
ug/L
ND
1000
1000
884
944
88
94
75-125
7
20
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 21 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
QC Batch: 779258 Analysis Method: EPA 7470A
QC Batch Method: EPA 7470A Analysis Description: 7470 Mercury
Laboratory: Pace Analytical Services - Peachtree Corners, GA
Associated Lab Samples: 92669674001, 92669674002, 92669674003, 92669674004, 92669674005, 92669674006, 92669674007,
92669674008,92669674009,92669674010,92669674011,92669674012,92669674013,92669674014
METHOD BLANK: 4042245 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92669674001, 92669674002, 92669674003, 92669674004, 92669674005, 92669674006, 92669674007,
92669674008,92669674009,92669674010,92669674011,92669674012,92669674013,92669674014
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit MDL Analyzed Qualifiers
Mercury ug/L ND 0.20 0.13 06/08/2315:44
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 4042246
Spike LCS LCS % Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
Mercury ug/L 2.5 2.8 113 80-120
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 4042247 4042248
MS MSD
92669674001 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD % Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Mercury ug/L ND 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 103 108 75-125 5 20
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 22 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
QC Batch: 777722 Analysis Method: SM 2540C-2015
QC Batch Method: SM 2540C-2015 Analysis Description: 2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Laboratory: Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Associated Lab Samples: 92669674001, 92669674002, 92669674003, 92669674004, 92669674005, 92669674006, 92669674007,
92669674008,92669674009,92669674010,92669674011,92669674012,92669674013,92669674014
METHOD BLANK: 4034473 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92669674001, 92669674002, 92669674003, 92669674004, 92669674005, 92669674006, 92669674007,
92669674008,92669674009,92669674010,92669674011,92669674012,92669674013,92669674014
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit MDL Analyzed Qualifiers
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L ND 25.0 25.0 05/31/23 11:42
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 4034474
Spike LCS LCS % Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 250 260 104 90-110
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 4034475
92669674007 Dup Max
Parameter Units Result Result RPD RPD Qualifiers
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 249 259 4 25
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 4034476
92669674010 Dup Max
Parameter Units Result Result RPD RPD Qualifiers
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 10700 10200 5 25
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 23 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
QC Batch: 777681 Analysis Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
QC Batch Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993 Analysis Description: 300.0 IC Anions
Laboratory: Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Associated Lab Samples: 92669674001, 92669674002
METHOD BLANK: 4034209 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92669674001, 92669674002
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit MDL Analyzed Qualifiers
Sulfate mg/L ND 1.0 0.50 05/31/23 23:20
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 4034210
Spike LCS LCS % Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
Sulfate mg/L 50 49.7 99 90-110
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 4034211 4034212
MS MSD
92669629013 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD % Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Sulfate mg/L 0.61J 50 50 51.4 52.2 102 103 90-110 2 10
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 4034213 4034214
MS MSD
92669629023 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD % Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Sulfate mg/L 4.2 50 50 55.6 56.2 103 104 90-110 1 10
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 24 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
QC Batch: 777682 Analysis Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
QC Batch Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993 Analysis Description: 300.0 IC Anions
Laboratory: Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Associated Lab Samples: 92669674003, 92669674004, 92669674005, 92669674006, 92669674007, 92669674008, 92669674009,
92669674010,92669674011,92669674012,92669674013,92669674014
METHOD BLANK: 4034215 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92669674003, 92669674004, 92669674005, 92669674006, 92669674007, 92669674008, 92669674009,
92669674010,92669674011,92669674012,92669674013,92669674014
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit MDL Analyzed Qualifiers
Sulfate mg/L ND 1.0 0.50 05/31/2315:32
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 4034216
Spike LCS LCS % Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
Sulfate mg/L 50 50.3 101 90-110
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 4034217 4034218
MS MSD
92669674003 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD % Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Sulfate mg/L ND 50 50 51.6 52.5 103 104 90-110 2 10
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 4034219 4034220
MS MSD
92669674013 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD % Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Sulfate mg/L 65.2 50 50 49.4 48.9 -32 -33 90-110 1 10 M1
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 25 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALIFIERS
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
DEFINITIONS
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to dilution of the sample aliquot.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
TNTC - Too Numerous To Count
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL -Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit.
RL - Reporting Limit - The lowest concentration value that meets project requirements for quantitative data with known precision and
bias for a specific analyte in a specific matrix.
S - Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine decomposes to and cannot be separated from Azobenzene using Method 8270. The result for each analyte is
a combined concentration.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
SG - Silica Gel - Clean -Up
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2 Chloroethylvinyl ether.
A separate vial preserved to a pH of 4-5 is recommended in SW846 Chapter 4 for the analysis of Acrolein and Acrylonitrile by EPA
Method 8260.
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Reported results are not rounded until the final step prior to reporting. Therefore, calculated parameters that are typically reported as
"Total" may vary slightly from the sum of the reported component parameters.
Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
TN -The NELAC Institute.
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
D3 Sample was diluted due to the presence of high levels of non -target analytes or other matrix interference.
M1 Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 26 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Project:
Pace Project No.:
SWIFT CREEK
92669674
Analytical
Lab ID
Sample ID
QC Batch Method
QC Batch
Analytical Method
Batch
92669674001
MW-01 S-WG-20230526
EPA 3010A
778690
EPA 6010D
778828
92669674002
MW-01 D-WG-20230526
EPA 3010A
778690
EPA 6010D
778828
92669674003
MW-02S-WG-20230526
EPA 3010A
778886
EPA 6010D
779071
92669674004
MW-02D-WG-20230526
EPA 3010A
778886
EPA 6010D
779071
92669674005
MW-03-WG-20230526
EPA 3010A
778690
EPA 6010D
778828
92669674006
MW-04-WG-20230526
EPA 3010A
778886
EPA 6010D
779071
92669674007
MW-05RS-WG-20230525
EPA 3010A
778690
EPA 6010D
778828
92669674008
MW-05RD-WG-20230525
EPA 3010A
778690
EPA 6010D
778828
92669674009
MW-06-WG-20230526
EPA 3010A
778690
EPA 6010D
778828
92669674010
MW-07-WG-20230526
EPA 3010A
778690
EPA 6010D
778828
92669674011
MW-08-WG-20230526
EPA 3010A
778886
EPA 6010D
779071
92669674012
SW-01-WG-20230525
EPA 3010A
778690
EPA 6010D
778828
92669674013
SW-02-WG-20230526
EPA 3010A
778690
EPA 6010D
778828
92669674014
FD-01-WG-20230526
EPA 3010A
778690
EPA 6010D
778828
92669674001
MW-01 S-WG-20230526
EPA 7470A
779258
EPA 7470A
779380
92669674002
MW-01 D-WG-20230526
EPA 7470A
779258
EPA 7470A
779380
92669674003
MW-02S-WG-20230526
EPA 7470A
779258
EPA 7470A
779380
92669674004
MW-02D-WG-20230526
EPA 7470A
779258
EPA 7470A
779380
92669674005
MW-03-WG-20230526
EPA 7470A
779258
EPA 7470A
779380
92669674006
MW-04-WG-20230526
EPA 7470A
779258
EPA 7470A
779380
92669674007
MW-05RS-WG-20230525
EPA 7470A
779258
EPA 7470A
779380
92669674008
MW-05RD-WG-20230525
EPA 7470A
779258
EPA 7470A
779380
92669674009
MW-06-WG-20230526
EPA 7470A
779258
EPA 7470A
779380
92669674010
MW-07-WG-20230526
EPA 7470A
779258
EPA 7470A
779380
92669674011
MW-08-WG-20230526
EPA 7470A
779258
EPA 7470A
779380
92669674012
SW-01-WG-20230525
EPA 7470A
779258
EPA 7470A
779380
92669674013
SW-02-WG-20230526
EPA 7470A
779258
EPA 7470A
779380
92669674014
FD-01-WG-20230526
EPA 7470A
779258
EPA 7470A
779380
92669674001
MW-01S-WG-20230526
SM 2540C-2015
777722
92669674002
MW-01D-WG-20230526
SM 2540C-2015
777722
92669674003
MW-02S-WG-20230526
SM 2540C-2015
777722
92669674004
MW-02D-WG-20230526
SM 2540C-2015
777722
92669674005
MW-03-WG-20230526
SM 2540C-2015
777722
92669674006
MW-04-WG-20230526
SM 2540C-2015
777722
92669674007
MW-05RS-WG-20230525
SM 2540C-2015
777722
92669674008
MW-05RD-WG-20230525
SM 2540C-2015
777722
92669674009
MW-06-WG-20230526
SM 2540C-2015
777722
92669674010
MW-07-WG-20230526
SM 2540C-2015
777722
92669674011
MW-08-WG-20230526
SM 2540C-2015
777722
92669674012
SW-01-WG-20230525
SM 2540C-2015
777722
92669674013
SW-02-WG-20230526
SM 2540C-2015
777722
92669674014
FD-01-WG-20230526
SM 2540C-2015
777722
92669674001
MW-01S-WG-20230526
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
777681
92669674002
MW-01 D-WG-20230526
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
777681
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56
PM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 27 of 33

leAnalyiical
www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Project: SWIFT CREEK
Pace Project No.: 92669674
Lab ID Sample ID
92669674003
MW-02S-WG-20230526
92669674004
MW-02D-WG-20230526
92669674005
MW-03-WG-20230526
92669674006
MW-04-WG-20230526
92669674007
MW-05RS-WG-20230525
92669674008
MW-05RD-WG-20230525
92669674009
MW-06-WG-20230526
92669674010
MW-07-WG-20230526
92669674011
MW-08-WG-20230526
92669674012
SW-01-WG-20230525
92669674013
SW-02-WG-20230526
92669674014
FD-01-WG-20230526
Date: 06/13/2023 12:56 PM
QC Batch Method QC Batch
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1
1993
777682
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1
1993
777682
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1
1993
777682
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1
1993
777682
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1
1993
777682
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1
1993
777682
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1
1993
777682
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1
1993
777682
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1
1993
777682
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1
1993
777682
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1
1993
777682
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1
1993
777682
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Analytical
Analytical Method Batch
Page 28 of 33

Effective Date: 11/14/2022
Laboratory receiving samples: _J
Asheville ❑ Eden❑ Greenwood ❑ Huntersville Raleigh❑ Mechanicsville❑ AtiantaD Kernprcuiilol-1
Sample Condition Client Name. --
UPon Receipt C N C Project i WO# : 92669674 j
Courier: ❑Fed Ex ❑UPS ❑ Client
❑OthOthe
❑ Commercial ❑Pace I I I I
r:
92659674
Custody Seal Present? Dyes No Seals Intact? Dyes VNo
Packing Material; ❑Bubble Wrap OBubble Gags R/None n Other
Thermo MAty. - `
IR Gun O
Type of Ice: Wet ❑Blue
% 1. Correction Factor: �} p
Cooler Temp: `__. Add/Subtract ('C) Q/
Cooler Temp Corrected('C• �. 1,
USDA Regulated Soil (E A, water sample)
Did samples originate in a quarantine zone within the United States: CA, NY, or SC
(check maps)? [7Yes nNo
Chain of Custody Present?
es
No
[I N/A
1.
Samples Arrived within Hold Time?
Yes
❑No
❑N/A
Z.
Short Hold Time Analysis (<72 hr.)?
❑Yes
INa
❑N/A
3.
Rush Turn Around Time Requested?
❑Yes
o
[]N/A
4.
Sufficient Volume?
9'es
❑No
❑NJA
5,
Correct Containers Used?
CJYes
[]NO
❑N/R
6.
Pace Containers Used?
We
❑No
❑N/A
Containers Intact?
byres
[)No
❑N/A
7.
Dissolved analysis: Samples Field Filtered?
Dyes
[]No
N/A
$.
Sample Labels Match CPC?
❑No
❑N/A
9
-Includes Date/Time/Ill/Analysis Matrix;
VV
Headspace in VOA Vials (>5-6mmP
LE] Yes
❑No
/A
10,
Trip Blank Present?
❑Yes
❑No
Trip Blank Custody Seals Present?
COMMENTS/SAMPLE DISCREPANCY
CLIENT NOTIFICATION/RESOLUTION
Person contacted:
Project Manager SCURF Review:
Project Manager SRF Review:
Qualtrax ID: 69614
Date/Initials Person Examining Contents: / 1 rr
Biological Tissuq Fr en? L�
❑Yes ❑No /A
❑None
Temp should be above freezing to 6°C
❑Samplesout of temp criteria. Samples on ice, cooling process
has begun
Did samples originate from a foreign source (Internationally,
including Hawaii and Puerto Rico)? ❑Yes El No
Comments/Dlscrepancv:
Lot ID Of split containers:
Date/Time:
Date:
Date:
Field Data Required? Oyes ❑No
Page 1 of 2
Page 29 of 33

scir,u't:,:�s
Effective Date: 11/14/2022
*Check mark top half of box if pH and/or dechlorination is verified and Project �WO"" : 926696 r 4
within the acceptance range for preservation samples. PM: MW8 Due Date: 06/13/23
Exceptions: VOA, Coliform, TOC, Oil and Grease, DRO/8015 (water) DOC, LLHg CLIENT: 92—ERM
**Bottom half of box is to list number of bottles }
***Check all unpreserved Nitrates for chlorine I
E
w
_
V
N
N
y
a
D
u
a
E
a
m
W
a7
y
a
7
a
E
m
a
m
a
z
Gl
N
Q
D
u
a
E
lf�l
N
a
m
a
W
N
c
M
w
_
7
4
m
Y
w
V
2
R
tA O
S
u
ii
E
v1
o
a
m
V
2
(n
O
Y
a
E
Z
m
a
m
Q
M
Z
°il
u
«
U
N
a
E
,N.�
a
a
m
N
n
2
G
z
a
E
ti
v
o
m
v
a
M.
N
0
w
E
{g
3
a
Z
'a
a
N
rx
a
a
a
•-
C7
a
y
V
=
a
u
S
E
a
m
a -I
.e
l7
a
Z
W
it
w
a
a
E
tV
m
[7
¢
_
N
Q
a
x
E
¢
¢
N
I
t7
a
N
V
a
V
O
¢
J
E
l!7
N
m
L7
a
w
V
a
?
V
S
Z
E
a
J
E
cs
s
Q
z
Q 9
2 as
S
q m
w O a
U N
O p O
7 > >
J .J +
E E E
q
m ai a
t7 W W
o > a
¢
V
It
00
m
0
>
J
E
Y
e+
W
o
¢
`
?
y
QJ
c
a
a
J
N
r.
0.
sc
Z
�,
Y
C7
CL
a
a
rn
C7
a
ra
Q
?
u
a
'n
E
,My
sn
a
w
ry
a
z
?
a
121
41
in
E
N
N
a
n
of
M
Ol
a
O
N
z
M
E
Ln
m
a
m
a
?
'O
dl z
Q�
p� 7
a
¢ u
J
E
N
C CS
l7 vi
a >
z
G!
M
c
Q
J
a
m
l7
o
X
_
2
I
3
�
I
I
4
�
1
`
—
5
\�\VXN
6
I
\,X
7
8
pH Adjustment Log for Preserved Samples
Sample ID Type of Preservative pH upon receipt Date preservation adjusted Time preservation Amount of Preservative Lot 4
adjusted added
Note: Whenever there is a discrepancy affecting North Carolina compliance samples, a copy of this form will he sent to the North Carolina DENR Certification Office (i.e.
Out of hold, incorrect preservative, out of temp, incorrect containers.
Qualtrax ID: 69614
Page 2of2
Page 30 of 33

Effeetive Date: 05/121202205/12%Zpz2
*Check mark top half of box if pH and/or dechlorination is verified and
within the acceptance range for preservation samples.
Exceptions: VOA, Coliform, TOC, Oil and Grease, DRO/8015 (water] DOC, LLitg
**Bottom half of box is to fist number of bottles
***Check all unpreserved Nitrates for chlorine
Q GG
Projec Wa# • 9266,96 i7
4
PM: MW�:19)
Due Oahe: 06/13/23
CLIENTERM
Z
A
a
z
a
M
c
ro
EL
E
1lN�
E tf
w a
m
z
m
N
n
c
m
j
E
u�i
M
a
m
z
m
N
a
c
ro
aJ
E
a
N
d
m
�Z..
v
v
a.
C
h
a
L
.=
.4
0.
m
V
a
O
i
!6
a
J
,n
,'vy
V
aY
m
rr
v
a
p
Z
=
u
ry
a
E
0
fV
M
0.
m
M
u
a
N
u
N
d
J
'^
,M.,
6
m
M
n
a
=
O
z
_V
a
J
,�E
a
m
C
?
l�
'?
Z
a
2
m
a
C
�
M
q
4
=
N
(7
d
v
n
l.J
L
Q
H
ra
Q
m
aNr
a
c
a`r
p
Q
J
E
o
U'
Q
N
v
a
a
t7
N
=
d
E
Q
°'
,y
0
Q
V
x
a
O
�
a
J
C,
N
(a
Q
U
u
v
Z
L
¢
J
uo�
N
OT
C
?
U
=
�!
E
Q7
O
Q
¢
Y w
m y
O
V7 d
FL
m r:
a
Q Q
>
J J
E E
g
M at
] ?
?
v
0
CL
M
S
O
1J
J
ppE
V
m
a
?
V
S
p
}
E
cj
Ml7
a
z
x
=
0.
]
v
(1
N
'°
M
}
m
z
•„
M
W
?;
ul
J
E
r4
�
N
A
i
z
u
N
61
;;
ut
E
V)
M
LcoQ
M
v
IA
iv
=
61
°
�'
J
E
M
Z
a
Z
a
a
C
Q
E
E
0
z
m
C
.�
J
N
7
o
a
N
a
a
O
1
`
1
-
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
PH Adjustment Log for Preserved Samples
Sample ID Type of Preservative pH upon receipt Date preservation adjusted Time preservation Amount of Preservative lot #
adjusted added
—I.., 111— -.c, I„V,�" d uix.icpdnLy arrecung Nortn l.aroiina CDmF
Out of hold, incorrect preservative, out of temp, incorrect containers.
Qualtrax ID: 69614
a copy of this form will be sent to the North Carolina DENRCertifkation Office (i.e.
Page 2 of 2
Page 31 of 33

o
o
o
a
o
w
o
b
b
b
m 3 w m
X7
O
[Nil
II
y
p 0 m o g
m m13 o
Gi
G'7Gi
l]
G�i
b
O�D Z m Z
m
Nm cb
a
3 w, Cn
o
N
r
77
w
�gagolrvA �r�g
91.
n
o a M m 6 6
O O u n
n�$a� o
Y vo '. o S,
m e
m o
0
# v m a o G W w
Q 9FL
3
n �
MATRIX CODE {see valid codes to left]
m 0
�
SAMPLETYPE (G=GRAB C=COMP(
E m c.
l
M
F
�y
D
D
7
O
y
m
22
z
g
m
fp
m m
t;n
' V
61
m
O
m
z n
i 3
g
0
m
A
SAMPLE TEMP AT COLLECTION
m T
N
ryr
F,
S OF CONTAINERS
O !1
y v y o
n n
1
Unpreserved
a
m m m 3
O N m 0
o o On
H2SO4
m o m v c m r 0
il M
HNO3
-u
# m m 3 y
HCI
m
w p N r
NaOH
n^+
N a O n
0
b o
n
Na2S203
y
m n
m
R
C
Methanol
y r�+n
m
Other
Analyses Test
YIN
a
P
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
ix
x
x
Tota 1(6011717470)
w
O
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
X
x
x
x
x
Sulfale by 31
n $
m
rP
x
x
X
x
X
x
X
X
X
x
x
x
Total Dissolved Solids (TOS
n p y
a
�
� w c ❑
0
a cr C�
r C
3
NJ
1,
N
l�
N
Vl
J
w �
m
� .
TEMP in C
m
3
Residual Chlorine (YIN)
Received on
zIce
�S
Sealed
\
Cooler
J
C'
o
Y!N
w
Samples
Intact
-:z,
ti
(YIN)
Page 32 of 33

a
e
o ? n n
o S
fJ N
an d m
z W m .�.
°z
chi 3
m y m
2
G
m q n n
Z Z
0 tin n ( J
�
m 3
N
W � Cb
c
0 3
9
ip m r
3 3 co
m rn
m ty
ooEE
><
x
r
m
m
su
N
a
3
a
M
C,
g m
N
a a L O m�U m
a n S
G
# zO Q a y
m
Z.MATRIX
CO➢F (see vaiid codes to left)
0
0
SAMPLETYPE (G=GRAB C=COMP)
rn a.
x
F
m
n N w
m
Fq
y
m
x
3
D
9
Ll A
Z Z
r
A
m C
�
a
m
p ^I
M, RZ
N
1t o rl
"Ici
m m
m
ri
1 0
m
Z) CD
z
a n
m
N n
+
o
r
m m
z
"�
J m
a 6 Q
C
SAMPLE TEMP AT COLLECTION
m
00FCONTAINERS
C? pa 0
d d a n 3 to
3 o m `a C
m
>< Unpreserved
a O y m n o v rn'
H2SO4
w
n
m z
m r- O
� o
HNO3
m ❑
HCi cn
D
r
° a
NaOH
O n
D
Na2S203
o C
w
y
a ffl
�l
Q
Methanol
: Z Mot
f y
r
s
Other
y_
\
Analyses Tes! YIN
n m
x x x
x
m
Tola RCRAB (60100470}
m x < :D
mx
�
x x
x Sulfate by 300-0
`
x X x
x Total Dissolved Solids (TOS
o p N w
a
c ❑
it 0
m
l
V
O
n O C
CD
I
1! a CD
G
1
$ 0 C rt
a n
N
� a
TEMP in C
m
Residual Chlorine (Y!N)
y m
d e y
Recaived on
o a
Ire
may(
4
z
n
(YIN)
n
u5
(Fn
C7
(i
y
Sealed
\
n
N S
°
Cooler
o
� `�
O
Y!N
m
Samz
\ i
I
Intact
(Y!N (
N
Page 33 of 33

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION EFFECTIVENESS REPORT — MAY 2023
APPENDIX D MANN KENDALL ANALYSIS REPORT
May 2023
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology

Trend Analysis Report
September 26, 2023
1. USER WARNINGS
Mann Kendall analysis is a commonly used statistical tool for assessing changes in concentration over
time. Like most statistical analyses, Mann Kendall makes some assumptions about the data being
analyzed. If these assumptions are not met, the results of the Mann Kendall may be wrong or misleading.
The final section of this memo discusses scenarios that will likely require the input of a qualified
statistician to ensure that the results of the trend test are appropriate for your data. A careful review of the
results tables and figures can help identify any anomalies in the data that merit further assessment.
Selection of an appropriate a: Statistical convention typically uses an a equal to 0.05 which sets the
probability of drawing a false positive conclusion (saying there is a trend when one does not exist) in the
statistical analysis at 5 percent. a can be adjusted up or down to meet specific programmatic needs or to
meet data quality objectives, but changes in a should be made a priori and should not be changed in an
attempt to obtain a more `favorable' result. Often decreasing a will result in a reduction in the probability
of finding a false negative result (saying there is no trend when one actually exists).
2. INTRODUCTION
This report covers the REUSE-SWIFTCREEK data quality, descriptive statistics, and trend analysis.
• The data file used in this report (ARII_MannKendall_202309.xlsx) consists of samples from June
2018 to May 2023.
• The analysis includes 13 unique wells and 3 analytes.
• Descriptive statistics and trend analysis are run for every unique combination of: sys_loc_code,
chemical —name (referred to as Group from hereon). There are 39 unique Groups.
• Trends were conducted at 95% confidence with minimum data requirements of at least 4
detected values and 50% detection frequency for each Group.
3. DATA HANDLING
This section describes the data included in this evaluation, the handling of field duplicates, data qualifiers,
censored values, and handling of anomalous data points.
3.1 Field Duplicates
Only one set of primary and field duplicate measurements were retained for statistical evaluation. While
field duplicates can provide useful information on the sampling methodology, the duplicates are almost
always statistically dependant on the parent sample (USEPA 2009, Page 6-27). Although complicated
methods can be used to allow the inclusion of both values in statistical tests, simpler strategies involve
keeping the maximum value between the two samples, randomly selecting one of the two samples, or
removing the duplicates altogether (USEPA 2009, Page 6-28). Unless otherwise noted, field duplicates
were removed prior to all analysis.
The business of sustainability

3.2 Data Qualifiers
Data was qualified by a data validator to ensure the quality of the reported results. Consistent with lab
conventions, J-flagged values were estimated quantities. Guidance allows for J-flagged values to be used
with reported concentrations but cautions against making regulatory decision based on these values
(USEPA 2014).
Measurements that have an R-flag had their concentration rejected; the result is rejected due to serious
deficiencies in meeting quality control criteria and the analyte may or may not be present in the sample
(USEPA 2014). The data quality review found the results to be valid, reliable and useable for decision
making purposes with the listed qualifiers. No analytical results were rejected.
3.3 Non -Detects
Non -detects (NDs) commonly reported in water monitoring are statistically known as "left censored"
measurements because the concentration of any ND can only be estimated. NDs are assumed to fall
between zero and the reporting limit (USEPA 2009). USEPA (2015) offers a number of options for
handling non -detected values, including Kaplan -Meier estimators, Regression on Order Statistics, and
replacement with surrogate values. The appropriate handling of NDs depends on the statistical test being
used and will be discussed in the following sections as appropriate.
Multiple reporting limits were found for several Groups. Of the 39 unique Groups, 16 of them had different
reporting limits.
Maximum reporting limits were found to be greater than detected values for 2 of the Groups.
4. DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS
Descriptive statistics were calculated for all Groups and can be found in Table 1. Non -detects were
substituted with a value of half the reporting limit for calculations. The descriptive statistics highlight a
number of relevant characteristics about the datasets, including:
• There are a total of 39 Groups.
• 18 Groups have detection rates greater than or equal to 50 percent.
• 18 Groups have 100 percent non -detects.
• 14 Groups have 100 percent detects.
• 10 Groups follow a normal distribution (using Shapiro-Wilks Normality Test) and 0 Groups follow
a log -normal distribution. The remaining 29 Groups have no discernible distribution.
5. TESTING FOR TRENDS
Trend tests are a commonly used tool to assess the effectiveness of remediation efforts. By examining
whether concentrations are increasing, decreasing, or not significant, trend tests provide one line of
evidence about the directional change in concentrations over time.
5.1 Trend Testing Approach
A Mann Kendall test was used to detect changes in concentrations over time. The Mann Kendall Test is a
non -parametric method that tests the following null hypothesis (USEPA 2009):
Null Hypothesis (Ho): No monotonic trend exists.
The business of sustainability

Alternative Hypothesis (Ha): A monotonic trend exists.
A monotonic upward (downward) trend means that the variable consistently increases (decreases)
through time, but the trend may or may not be linear. The Mann -Kendall test is based on the premise that
the lack of monotonic trend should correspond to a time series plot fluctuating randomly about a constant
median with no visually apparent upward or downward pattern (Helsel and Hirsch 2002). Significantly
increasing or decreasing trends (r) are identified at a significant level (a) of less than or equal to 0.05. TZ
can be used like an RZ value to estimate how much variance in y is explained by x (i.e., what proportion of
the variability in concentration is explained by time). USEPA 2009 guidance and/or Helsel and Hirsch
(2002) may be consulted for further details for the Mann -Kendall test. With the specified 95% confidence,
significantly increasing or decreasing trends are identified with p-values as follows:
Tau
p-value
Positive
p <= 0.05
Negative
p <= 0.05
Positive or Negative
p > 0.05
5.2 Data Constraints
Conclusion
Trend
Ho Rejected
Increasing
Ho Rejected
Decreasing
Ho Accepted
Not Significant
Guidance recommends that trend tests be performed with at least eight detected data points to ensure a
reasonable amount of confidence in results (USEPA 2009, p. 17-24). However, it is mathematically
possible to carry out the test with five detected samples. The consequences of using the minimum
sample size is that there is a greater chance of concluding that there is no trend when, in fact there is a
trend (USEPA 2009). If a dataset is comprised of more than 50 percent ND values, the loss of information
is considered too great to support a reliable analysis of trends, so no Mann Kendall test was formed.
Consistent with guidance, in cases where FOD was greater than 50 percent, NDs were substituted with a
constant that is below the lowest detected value (Helsel and Hirsch 2002). This ensures that all NDs are
"tied" in the Mann Kendall and that changing reporting limits have limited influence on whether trends are
detected (USEPA 2009, Helsel and Hirsch 2002). NDs were chosen to be substituted with a value of zero
for the trend analysis.
5.3 Results
Trend tests were calculated with 95% confidence for all Groups that met the minimum data requirements
of at least 4 detected values and 50% detection frequency. A full report of the Mann Kendall trend test
results and timeseries plots can be found in Table 2. The following summarize the results of the trend
analysis:
• There are a total of 39 Groups in the dataset.
• 16 Groups meet the data requirements of the trend test. Of those:
• 2 Groups had a significant increasing trend,
• 3 Groups had a significant decreasing trend,
• 11 Groups had no significant trend.
Time series scatterplots are provided in Figure 1 for each Group. Detection limits for each sample are
also plotted for an easy visual assessment of changing detection limits over time. For Groups with
significant trend, a visual of the linear fit is provided on the graph. The Mann Kendall is a correlation test
and does not provide an estimate of the slope and y-intercept. A parametric test was used to provide a
visual guide only.
The business of sustainability ERM

6. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
Like most statistical analyses, Mann Kendall makes some assumptions about the data being analyzed
including:
• Observations or data obtained over time are independent.
• The observations obtained over time are representative of the true conditions at sampling times.
• The sample collection, handling, and measurement methods provide unbiased and representative
observations of the underlying populations over time.
There is no requirement that the measurements be normally distributed. The Mann Kendall test
can be computed if there are missing values and varying detection limits, but the performance of
the test will be adversely affected by such events. The assumption of independence requires that
the time between samples be sufficiently large so that there is no correlation between
measurements collected at different times.
The Mann Kendall test does not assume that the underlying relationship is linear. However, in cases
where the data are clearly curvilinear, it may be more appropriate to consult with a statistician to employ
different statistical techniques that more accurately characterize the changes in concentration over time.
Special consideration should be given to dataset with clear seasonality and/or NDs. These are
considered in the following sections.
6.1 Seasonality
Seasonal changes in precipitation and temperature can cause cyclical fluctuations in groundwater
concentrations. These seasonal fluctuations functionally add `noise' to the data. This type of noise is
called serial dependence and can make it difficult to determine trends in the data because of a long-term
persistent pattern (like seasonality) or whether it represents a true, underlying change. USEPA Guidance
(2009) strongly recommends accounting for seasonality when performing linear trends in hydrologic data.
Seasonality has not been explicitly handled in the data described herein.
6.2 Non -Detects and Detection Limits
Non -detects (NDs) commonly reported in water monitoring are statistically known as "left censored"
measurements because the concentration of any non -detect either cannot be estimated or is not reported
directly. Rather, it is known or assumed only to fall within a certain range of concentration values (USEPA
2009 p. 15-1). With higher detection limits, that uncertainty is greater because the true value lies
somewhere in a larger range of possible values.
USEPA (2006) notes that no general procedures exist for the statistical analyses of censored datasets. If
a dataset is comprised of more than 50 percent non -detected (ND) values, guidance cautions the user
when interpreting the results of statistical tests, especially for relatively small datasets (USEPA 2009). In
the context of Mann Kendall, there is general agreement that substituting a constant below the lowest
detected value is the best solution for handling non -detected values.
When detection rates are below 85 percent, however, this simple substitution method may lead to bias in
the correlation estimates. Visually reviewing the data is a key step in interpreting the appropriateness of
the statistical results. The time series plots have been generated using the detection limit for non -detects
so that detection rates and multiple detection limits can be visualized. Additional statistical testing may be
needed to address datasets with low detection rates or elevated detection limits.
The business of sustainability

7. REFERENCES
Helsel and Hirsch. 2002. Statistical Methods in Water Resources. Chapter A3. U.S. Department of the
Interior, U.S. Geological Survey.
USEPA. 2006. Data Quality Assessment: Statistical Methods for Practitioners. EPA QA/G-9S. Office of
Environmental Information. Washington, DC.
USEPA. 2009. Statistical Analysis of Groundwater Monitoring Data at RCRA Facilities. Unified Guidance.
EPA/530/R/09/007. Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery. Washington, D.C.
USEPA. 2014. National Functional Guidelines for Superfund Organic Methods Data Review. USEPA 540-
R-014-002. OSWER 9355.0-132. August.
USEPA. 2015. ProUCL Version 5.1.002 Technical Guide: Statistical Software for Environmental
Applications for Data Sets with and without Nondetect Observations. Publication EPA/600/R-07/041,
October.
The business of sustainability

J
0
c�
L
U
0
W
25
W
15
10
5
0
Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
mwain Arzpnir_
CVI
ao c M M C: O O c CO CO
�N �N �pN �N �N �N �N N
O O O O O O O O O O O
N N N N 04 N N N N N N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 0
% Detect: 0
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

0
0
4
2
0
Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
mwal n I Part
CVI
ao c M M C: O O c CO CO
M � � M N � N M N � N M N � N M N N
O O O O O O O —3 O O O O
N N N N N N N N N N N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 0
% Detect: 0
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

W
15
5
0
Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
mwain Siilfa4P
ao c M M C: O O c 04 CO CO
�N �N �pN �N �N N �N N
O O O O O O O O O O O
N N N N 04 N N N N N N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 8
% Detect: 100
95% Confidence
MK Trend: NS
MK p-val: 0.802
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
W
25
on
5
a
MWH15, Arsenic
CAI
ao c M M C: o o c
�o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o
N N 04 N 04 N N N N N N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 0
% Detect: 0
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
0
0
4
2
0
mweI5. Lead
CVI
ao c M M C: o o c
�o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o
N N 04 N 04 N N N N N N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 1
% Detect: 12
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
:6110,
400
0)
E
O
300
aD
U
O
U 200
100
0
mwei5, Suitate
ao c M M C: o o c
�o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o
N N N N 04 N N N N N N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 8
% Detect: 100
95% Confidence
MK Trend: Significant
MK p-val: 0.034
Direction: Increasing
Lines
Linear Fit
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

J
0
c�
L
U
0
W
25
W
15
10
5
0
Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
mwa?n Arzpnir_
CVI
ao c M M C: o o c
�o Mo �o Mo �o Mo �o -)o �o Mo �o
04 04 04 N N N N 04 N N N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 0
% Detect: 0
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

W
0
0
4
2
0
Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
mwa?n I Part
CVI
ao c M M C: o o c
�o Mo �o Mo �o MC) �o -)o �o Mo �o
04 04 04 N N N N 04 N N N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 0
% Detect: 0
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
AA\AII%Il %
W
1.5
0.5
M
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 6
% Detect: 75
95% Confidence
MK Trend: NS
MK p-val: 0.209
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit
����o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o o o o
04 04 04 N N N N N N N N

Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
25
W
15
10
5
0
Arsenic
CVI
ao c M M C: o o c
�o Mo o Mo o Mo �o -)o o Mo o
N N 04 N N N N N N N N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 0
% Detect: 0
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
0
0
4
2
0
Lead
CVI
ao c M M C: o o c
�o Mo o Mo o Mo �o -)o o Mo o
N N 04 N N N N N N N N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 0
% Detect: 0
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
W
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
10
MW02S, Sulfate
17
17 17 17 0 17 17
17
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 0
% Detect: 0
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit
ao c M M C: o o c
�o Mo o Mo �o Mo �o -)o o Mo o
N N 04 N N N N N N N N

J
0
c�
L
U
0
W
25
W
15
10
5
0
Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
MWA� ArQpnir_
CVI
ao c M M C: o o c
�o Mo o Mo �o Mo �o -)o �o Mo o
N N 04 N 04 N N N N N N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 0
% Detect: 0
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
AA\AM11 1 __r
10
0
0 4
U
2
0
�L U �U) �v 5L..) �� �� CcN �c14 C:v) 5V)
CD O CD CDO O O O O O O
04 N 04 N 04 N N N N N N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 3
% Detect: 38
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

J
U)
0
N
U
0
W
1000
400
200
0
Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
MWA3 SII1fa+P
ao c M M C: o o c
�o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o
N N 04 N 04 N N N N N N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 8
% Detect: 100
95% Confidence
MK Trend: Significant
MK p-val: 0.0312
Direction: Decreasing
Lines
Linear Fit
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

J
0
c�
L
U
0
W
25
W
15
10
5
0
Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
MWAA ArQpnir_
CVI
ao cM M co o c�
�o Mo o Mo �o Mo �o -)o �o Mo �o
N N N N N N N N N N N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 1
% Detect: 12
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

W
0
0
4
2
0
Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
MWAA I Part
CVI
ao cM M co o c�
�o Mo o Mo �o Mo �o -)o �o Mo �o
N N N N N N N N N N N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 0
% Detect: 0
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

60
50
J
E
40
O
30
a�
U
O
AN
20
10
0
Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
MWAA Ridfa+P
ao cM M co o c�
�o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o
N N N N N N N N N N N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 8
% Detect: 100
95% Confidence
MK Trend: Significant
MK p-val: 0.00551
Direction: Decreasing
Lines
Linear Fit
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

0.015
J 0.010
a
0.005
Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
mwasn Arzpnir_
c 00
�o
N
Stats
N Data: 1
N Detect: 0
% Detect: 0
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
mwasn I Part
0.010
J
E 0.006
0.004
0.002
c 00
�o
N
Stats
N Data: 1
N Detect: 0
% Detect: 0
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
mwasn Siilfa4P
25
W
J
E 15
10
•
c 00
�o
N
Stats
N Data: 1
N Detect: 1
% Detect: 100
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

J
0
c�
L
U
0
W
25
W
15
10
5
0
Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
mwaj;p 1 Arzpnir_
CVI
c rn M c o o c 04 CO CO
Mo o Mo o Mo �o �o �o Mo �o
N N 04 N N N N N 04 04
Stats
N Data: 7
N Detect: 0
% Detect: 0
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

W
0
0
4
2
0
Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
mwasp 1 I Part
CVI
c rn M c o o c 04 CO CO
Mo o Mo o Mo �o Mo �o Mo �o
N N N N N N N N N 04
Stats
N Data: 7
N Detect: 0
% Detect: 0
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

15
10
U
5
0
Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
mwasp 1 SIIifntP
c rn M c o o c
Mo o Mo o Mo �o Mo �o Mo �o
N N N N N N N N N N
Stats
N Data: 7
N Detect: 7
% Detect: 100
95% Confidence
MK Trend: NS
MK p-val: 0.136
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

J
0
c�
L
U
0
W
25
W
15
10
5
0
Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
MWASRS ArcPnir_
CVI
c rn M c o o c 04 CO CO
Mo o Mo o Mo �o Mo �o Mo �o
N N N N N N N N N 04
Stats
N Data: 7
N Detect: 0
% Detect: 0
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

W
0
0
4
2
0
Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
MWASRS I Part
CVI
c rn M c o o c 04 CO CO
Mo o Mo o Mo �o Mo �o Mo �o
N N N N N N N N N 04
Stats
N Data: 7
N Detect: 0
% Detect: 0
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
ReIeinrnc• c ..IZ_A_
W
4
1
0
O-) O O O C: � C: CN 04 M M
N N N N M N N M N N
O O O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N N N
Stats
N Data: 7
N Detect: 6
% Detect: 86
95% Confidence
MK Trend: NS
MK p-val: 1
Shapes
--W- Detect
NonDetect
p Detect Limit

Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
0.015
J 0.010
a
0.005
Arsenic
c 00
�o
N
Stats
N Data: 1
N Detect: 0
% Detect: 0
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
Lead
0.010
J
E 0.006
0.004
0.002
c 00
�o
N
Stats
N Data: 1
N Detect: 0
% Detect: 0
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
12
10
J
E
5 u state
•
c 00
�o
N
Stats
N Data: 1
N Detect: 1
% Detect: 100
MK criteria not met
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
ReIeinc n ___—:_
W
40
10
0
w w w c_j v � � � cN 04 � v) v)
�pN �N �N DN MN �N �N �N
CD O O CD CD CD O O O O O
N N 04 N N N N N N 04 N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 7
% Detect: 88
95% Confidence
MK Trend: NS
MK p-val: 0.399
Shapes
--W- Detect
NonDetect
p Detect Limit

Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
RA\A/AC 1 __J
W
11
ORE
0
w w w c_j v � � � cN 04 � v) v)
�pN �N �N DN MN �N �N �N
CD O O CD CD CD O O O O O
N N 04 N N N N N N 04 N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 7
% Detect: 88
95% Confidence
MK Trend: NS
MK p-val: 0.179
Shapes
--W- Detect
NonDetect
p Detect Limit

1000
J
E 600
0
c�
L
400
0
W
200
0
Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
MWAF SII1fa+P
ao c M M C: 0 o c
�o �o �o �o 04 o �o �o -)o o �o o
N N 04 N 04 N 04 N N 04 N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 8
% Detect: 100
95% Confidence
MK Trend: NS
MK p-val: 0.0615
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
AA\A/A7 A ----:-
50
J
0) 40
E
O
30
a�
U
O
U
20
10
0
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 8
% Detect: 100
95% Confidence
MK Trend: NS
MK p-val: 0.262
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit
�o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o
N N 04 N 04 N N N 04 N N

W
150
100
50
0
Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
MWI47 I Part
00 C: M M C: o o cCN 04 CO CO
�o �o �o �o �o �o �o -3o o �o o
N N N N N N N N N N N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 8
% Detect: 100
95% Confidence
MK Trend: Significant
MK p-val: 0.0312
Direction: Increasing
Lines
Linear Fit
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

:01
600
0)
O
c�
L
400
U
O
W
200
0
Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
MWA7 Ridfa+P
00 C: M M C: o o c
�o �o �o �o o �o �o �o �o �o �o
N N 04 N 04 N N N 04 N N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 8
% Detect: 100
95% Confidence
MK Trend: NS
MK p-val: 0.0615
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
AA\A/AO A ----:-
.E
50
U 20
10
0
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 8
% Detect: 100
95% Confidence
MK Trend: NS
MK p-val: 0.901
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit
�o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o
N N 04 N 04 N N N 04 N N

Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
AA\A/AO 1 __J
150
U 50
0
w w w c� v � � c 04 L14 � v) V)
�� �pN �N MN DN �N �N �N �N
CD CD CD CD CD O O O O O O
N N N N 04 N 04 N N N N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 8
% Detect: 100
95% Confidence
MK Trend: NS
MK p-val: 0.0615
Shapes
--W- Detect
NonDetect
p Detect Limit

J
U)
0
N
U
0
W
1000
400
200
0
Scatterplots and Trend Analysis
MWAR SII1fa+P
00 C: M M C: 0 o c
�o �o �o �o o �o �o �o �o �o �o
N N 04 N 04 N N N N N N
Stats
N Data: 8
N Detect: 8
% Detect: 100
95% Confidence
MK Trend: Significant
MK p-val: 0.00174
Direction: Decreasing
Lines
Linear Fit
Shapes
--W- Detect
--&- NonDetect
p Detect Limit

ERM has over 160 offices across the following
countries and territories worldwide
Argentina
The Netherlands
ERM's Charlotte, NC Office
Australia
New Zealand
ERM NC, Inc.
Belgium
Norway
300 West Summit Avenue, Suite 330
Brazil
Panama
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
Canada
Peru
Chile
Poland
T: 704-541-8345
China
Portugal
F: 704-624-7928
Colombia
Puerto Rico
France
Romania
www.erm.com
Germany
Russia
Hong Kong
Singapore
India
South Africa
Indonesia
South Korea
Ireland
Spain
Italy
Sweden
Japan
Switzerland
Kazakhstan
Taiwan
Kenya
Thailand
Malaysia
UAE
Mexico
UK
Mozambique
US
Myanmar
Vietnam
The business of sustainability #-7 ERM