SF_F_NONCD0002287_20230919_FRB_PASI(2)

Peoples Cleaners
NONCD000 2287
Pre-CERCLA Screening References September 2023 1) United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 40 Code of Federal Regulations -
Part 300, Hazard Ranking System, July 1, 2019, Available On-line at:
https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/100002489.pdf 2) United States Environmental Protection Agency, Superfund Chemical Data Matrix, Appendix B, Updated July, 2022. Query at:https://www.epa.gov/superfund/superfund-chemical-
data-matrix-scdm-query
3) Mecklenburg County NC Geographic Information System (GIS): Polaris 3G (mecklenburgcountync.gov)
4) Google Earth Latitude and Longitude Determinations, Aerial Maps and Imagery: Google
Earth 5) NC DEQ Superfund Section Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch: ARC GIS IHSB Map Viewer: IHSB Map Viewer (arcgis.com).
6) Cooper Environmental, Inc, Charlotte, NC: “Phase I Environmental Site Assessment,
Peoples Cleaners, 1930 Beatties Ford Road, Charlotte, North Carolina, Cooper Project No. 95202.” December 4, 1995.
7) Swope, Eric, Compliance Coordinator, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Waste Management (DWM), Superfund Section, Dry-Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA): “DSCA Outreach Inspection Report, Peoples Cleaners, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC”, August 22, 2008.
8) Kim, Aram, NCDEQ, DWM, Superfund Section, DSCA Compliance Program: “Compliance Inspection Report, Peoples Cleaners, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC”, January 11, 2018. 9) Gregory, Johnny, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation Division, Group
902/North-South Carolina District, 6635 Executive Circle Drive, Suite 180, Charlotte, NC 28212: “Court Forfeiture and Leasing Documents, 1930 Beatties Ford Road”, March 14, 1994.

10) Cooper Environmental, Inc, Charlotte, NC: “Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Reort, Peoples Cleaners, 1930 Beatties Ford Road, Charlotte, North Carolina, Cooper Project
No. 96026”, March 4, 1996.
11) Overcash, Keith, P.E, Regional Supervisor, Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources (DEHNR), Division of Water Quality (DWQ), “Notice of Violation Letter, Peoples Cleaners, Mr. Quillie Smith, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC”, July 29, 1996.

12) Gibson, Judith, Register of Deeds, Mecklenburg County, Charlotte, NC: “United States Internal Revenue Service Deed Transfer, 1930 Beatties Ford Road”, June 30, 1997. 13) Fountain, Niki, Project Manager, NCDEQ, DWM, Superfund Section, DSCA: “Program
Choice Letter, Peoples Cleaners, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC”, May 7, 2007.
14) Swope, Eric, Compliance Coordinator, NCDEQ, DWM, Superfund Section, DSCA: “DSCA Outreach Inspection Report, Peoples Cleaners, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC”, March 13, 2007.

15) Fountain, Niki, Project Manager, NCDEQ, DWM, Superfund Section, DSCA: Memo, “Peoples Cleaners File Transfer to IHSB”, May 7, 2007. 16) Kim, Aram, NCDEQ, DWM, Superfund Section, DSCA Compliance Program:
“Compliance Inspection Report, Peoples Cleaners, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC”, January
11, 2018. 17) King, Jay, Project Manager, NCDEQ, DWM, Superfund Section, DSCA: “Notice of Dry-Cleaning Solvent Contamination: Peoples Cleaners, DC600006”, February 17, 2020.

18) Cobbs, Ne’Shonda, NCDEQ, DWM, Superfund Section, DSCA Compliance Program: “Compliance Inspection Report, Peoples Cleaners, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC”, June 8, 2022.
19) King, Jay, Project Manager, NCDEQ, DWM, Superfund Section, DSCA: E-
communication re: “Peoples Cleaners surface water sample location”, January 9, 2023. 20) Fortney, Caroline, Portfolio Manager, City of Charlotte, General Services: E-communication re: “2015 Custer Street Access and Proposed Phoenix Rising Subdivision”,
February 28, 2023.
21) Wood Environmental & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc, Charlotte, NC: “Report of Phase II Environmental Assessment, Proposed Phoenix Rising Subdivision, Custer Street and LaSalle Street, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28215, Wood Project No. 6228-20-6016.01.36”, July 23, 2021.

22) Heath, Ralph, Basic Elements of Groundwater Hydrology with Reference to Conditions in
North Carolina, Parts I-II, US Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Open-File Report 80-44, 1980: report.pdf (usgs.gov)

23) North Carolina Geological Survey, 1985, Geological Map of North Carolina: Raleigh, North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, Geological
Section, scale 1:5,000,000, in color: The Geology of North Carolina (arcgis.com)
24) United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. June 1980: Mecklenburg Soil Survey (mecknc.gov)
25) US Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web
Soil Survey: Web Soil Survey (usda.gov) 26) Mecklenburg County NC Health Department Well Information System (WIS) 4.0 LUESA-GIS Map Viewer: Well Information System 4.0 (mecklenburgcountync.gov)

27) City of Charlotte, Charlotte Water Source Water Protection Website: Water Quality > Source Water Protection (charlottenc.gov) 28) NCDEQ Source Water Assessment Program (SWAP) Info 2.0 GIS Mapping Tool:
SWAPInfo 2.0 (arcgis.com)
29) US EPA Vapor Intrusion Screening (VISL) Level Calculator Output. January 23, 2023: Vapor Intrusion Screening Level Home (ornl.gov)
30) City of Charlotte Stormwater Pipe/Open Drainage Maps: City of Charlotte Open Data
Portal (charlottenc.gov) 31) North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Fishing Areas GIS Mapping Tool: NC Fishing Areas & Trout Waters (ncpaws.org).

32) US Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Online Wetland Mapper: https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/mapper.html 33) NCDEQ, Natural Heritage Program Data Explorer: Map | North Carolina Natural Heritage
Data Explorer (natureserve.org).
34) White, Jeffrey R., NCDEQ Superfund Section: Pre-CERCLA Screening Passive Soil Gas Investigation Field Sampling Notes. February 27 and March 9, 2023.
35) Cobbs, Ne’Shonda, Compliance Inspector, NCDEQ, DWM, Superfund Section, DSCA
Compliance Program: Letter with Attachment to Smith, Quillie Smith, Owner, Peoples Cleaners (600017C), June 22, 2023. Attachment: DCSA Compliance Program, Inspection Report, Peoples Cleaners, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC, June 16, 2023.
36) Davidson, Landon, Project Manager, NC DEHNR, DWM: Record of Conversation,
“Peoples Cleaners NC Legislative Inquiry Report – UST Removal”, August 15-16, 2007.

37) Caldwell, Shawna, Hydrogeologist, NC Mecklenburg County Government, Groundwater and Wastewater Services: E-communication re: “New Drinking Water Wells”, August 9, 2023.
Attachment: 1942 and 1948 Saint Mark Street Drinking Water Well Laboratory Analytical Results,
2022. 38) US EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) Query: Mecklenburg County, NC. January August 9, 2023: SDWIS Search | Envirofacts | US EPA

39) U.S. Census Bureau Quick Facts Query: Mecklenburg County, NC. U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina; North Carolina

REFERENCE 1

Pt. 300, App. A 40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-19 Edition)
involuntarily obtains ownership or control of property by virtue of its function as sovereig·n; (2)Acquisitions by or transfers to a government entity or its agent (includ­ing governmental lending and credit institutions, loan guarantors, loan in­surers, and financial reg·ulatory enti­ties which acquire security interests or properties of failed private lending or depository institutions) acting as a conservator or receiver pursuant to a clear and direct statutory mandate or reg·ulatory authority; (3)Acquisitions or transfers of assetsthroug·h foreclosure and its equivalents (as defined in 40 OFR 300.ll00(d)(l)) or other means by a Federal, state, or local government entity in the course of administering a g·overnmental loan or loan guarantee or loan insurance progTam; and (4)Acquisitions by or transfers to a government entity pursuant to seizure or forfeiture authority. (b)Nothing· in this section or in OEROLA section 101(20)(D) or section 101(35)(A)(ii) affects the applicability of 40 OFR 300.1100 to any security inter­est, property, or asset acquired pursu­ant to an involuntary acquisition or transfer, as described in this section. NOTE TO PARAGRAPHS (a)(3) AND (b OF THIS SECTION: Reference to 40 CFR 300.1100 is a ref­erence to the provisions regarding secured creditors in CERCLA sections 101(20)(:E)-(G), 42 U.S.C. 9601(20)(:E)-(G). See Section 2504(a) of the Asset Conservation, Lender Liability, and Deposit Insurance Protection Act, Pub­lic Law, 104---208, 110 Stat. 3009-462, 3009-468 (1996). APPENDIX A TO PART 300-THE HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM Table of Contents List of Figures List of Tables 1.0. Introduction. 1.1 Definitions. 2.0 Evaluations Common to Multiple Path-ways. 2.1 Overview. 2.1.1 Calculation of HRS site score. 2.1.2 Calculation of pathway score. 2.1.3 Common evaluations. 2.2 Characterize sources. 2.2.1 Identify sources. 2.2.2 Identify hazardous substances associ­ated with a source. 2.2.3 Identify hazardous substances avail­able to a pathway. 2.3 Likelihood of release. 2.4 Waste characteristics. 2.4.1 Selection of substance potentially pos­ing· greatest hazard. 2.4.1.1 Toxicity factor. 2.4.1.2 Hazardous substance selection. 2,4,2 Hazardous waste quantity, 2.4.2.l Source hazardous waste quantity. 2.4.2.1.1 Hazardous constituent quantity. 2.4.2.1.2 Hazardous wastestream quantity. 2.4.2,1.3 Volume. 2.4.2.1.4 Area. 2.4.2.1.5 Calculation of source hazardous waste quantity value, 2.4.2.2 Calculation of hazardous waste quantity factor value, 2.4,3 Waste characteristics factor category value. 2.4.3.1 Factor category value. 2.4.3.2 Factor category value, considering bioaccumulation potential. 2,5 Targets. 2.5,l Determination of level of actual con-tamination at a sampling location. 2.6.2 Comparison to benchmarks. 3,0 Ground Water Migration Pathway, 3,0,1 General considerations, 3.0.1.1 Ground water target distance limit. 3.0.1.2 Aquifer boundaries. 3.0.1.2,1 Aquifer interconnections, 3,0,1.2.2 Aquifer discontinuities, 3.0.1.3 Karst aquifer. 3.1 Likelihood of release, 3,1.1 Observed release, 3,1,2 Potential to release, 3.1.2.l Containment, 3.1.2.2 Net precipitation, 3.1.2.3 Depth to aquifer. 3.1.2.4 Travel time. 3,1.2.5 Calculation of potential to release factor value, 3.1.3 Calculation of likelihood of release factor category value. 3.2 Waste characteristics, 3,2,1 Toxicity/mobility, 3.2.1.l Toxicity. 3.2.1.2 Mobility, 3.2.1.3 Calculation of toxicity/mobility factor value, 3,2,2 Hazardous waste quantity, 3,2.3 Calculation of waste characteristics factor category value, 3,3 Targets. 3.3,l Nearest well, 3.3,2 Population. 3.3.2.l Level of contamination. 3.3.2.2 Level I concentrations. 3.3,2,3 Level II concentrations, 3.3.2.4 Potential contamination, 3,3,2,5 Calculation of population factor value, 3,3,3 Resources. 3,3.4 Wellhead Protection Area, 3,3,5 Calculation of targets factor category value, 3.4 Ground water migration score for an aq­uifer, 110
1

REFERENCE 2

REFERENCE 3
SITE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed: 05/14/2023
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
07503605 07503605
Ownership
Owner Name Mailing Address
LEVINE C/O SOL LEVINE OF
LEVINE &
1930 BEATTIES FORD RD
CHARLOTTE NC 28216
QUILLIE SMITH 1930 BEATTIES FORD RD
CHARLOTTE NC 28216
Property Characteristics
Legal desc P1A-C &2A & B B1 M3-288 &
PT CLOSED ALLEY
Land Area 0.49 AC
Fire District CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type INDIVIDUAL
Municipality CHARLOTTE
Property Use COMMERCIAL
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed Sale Date Sale Price
09155-193 07/16/1997 $0.00
08220-717 07/21/1995 $0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area No
Census Tract #48
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer No Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#3710454500J
FEMA Panel Date 03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name IRWIN
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
1930 BEATTIES FORD RD CHARLOTTE
04/10/2014 from Mecklenburg County
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1
SITE
SITE
SITE
Nearest
Residence
SITE
University Park
Creative Arts
School
SITE
Kids R Us
Academy
SITE
Phoenix Rising
Proposed Housing
Development
2235 Haines St. WSW01/15/2023
St. Mark Street - WSWs01/15/2023
st paul street01/15/2023

REFERENCE 4
SITE
SITE
SITE
Residential
Residential
Future
Residential
Water Meter
SITE
SITE

REFERENCE 5
SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
PPE 1
SITE
PPE 1
SITE
PPE 1 PPE 2
SITE
PPE 2
SITE
PPE 2
SITE
PPE 2PPE1
SITE
PPE 2PPE1
SITE
SITE
PPE 2
Surface Water
Sample Location

REFERENCE 6

REFERENCE 7
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT Dry Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA) Compliance Program Outreach Inspection Report Date: 08/22/2008
Facility Identification Peoples Cleaners
Facility ID: 600017C DAQ ID: D076 (Meck) EPA Generator ID: NCD986188084 County/FIPS: Mecklenburg/119
Facility Data Peoples Dry Cleaners 1930 Beatties Ford Road Charlotte, NC 28216 Lat: 35m 15d 42.2s Long: 80m 51d 16.5s SIC : 7216 / Dry Cleaning Plants, Except Rugs NAICS: 81232 / Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) Date of Facility Establishment: ~ 1990
Compliance Data Inspection Date: 08/22/2008 Time In: 9:50 am Time Out: 11:50 am Inspector(s): ECS/ADR Operating Status: O/Operating Compliance Code(s): M-MMP violation Action Code: 54/INSPECTION - STATE COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Contact Data Classification Data Solvent: Perchloroethylene System: Dry-to-Dry Installation Date: ?? /2007 Installation Category: Existing/New Consumption Category: Small HW Generator Status : CESQG DSCA Site Number : 60-0006 (IHSB)
Facility Contact Quillie Smith 1930 Beatties Ford Road Charlotte, NC 28269 [phone]
Facility Owner Quillie Smith 1930 Beatties Ford Road Charlotte, NC 28269 [phone]
Property Owner Quillie Smith & Sol Levine 1930 Beatties Ford Road Charlotte, NC 28269 [phone]
Inspector’s Signature:
Date of Signature:
Comments: (MMP and RCRA procedural and recordkeeping requirements) NESHAP Status determined by Mecklenburg Co. AQ (NOV issued)
(I) DIRECTIONS: From the Mooresville Regional Office at 610 East Center Avenue in Mooresville, go west on East Center Avenue. Turn left onto S. Main St. (NC-152). Turn right onto W. McClelland Ave. (NC-152). Turn left onto NC-150. Merge onto I-77 South. Merge onto I-85 S via Exit 13B toward Spartanburg and take the Beatties Ford Rd. exit- (Exit 37). Turn right onto Beatties Ford Rd and the dry cleaning facility is located on the left at 1930 Beatties Ford Road.
(II) FACILITY DESCRIPTION: Peoples Cleaners is classified as an existing small dry cleaner facility, which has been operated by Mr. Quillie Smith, since approximately 1990. Peoples Cleaners was previously a bakery and fish market (1985-1990), and a filling station from the 1950’s to around 1985. PCE/TCE contamination has been discovered on this
property, and the site (60-0006) has been deferred to the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch. Peoples Cleaners has two dry-to-dry dry cleaning machines installed on site. The Realstar RS-260 dry cleaning machine
was no longer in operation, and was de-energized, but contained solvent and solvent waste. The machine was not installed within secondary containment. The Aero-Tech USA 410 dry cleaning machine was operational and did have secondary containment and a refrigerated condenser. Based on the quantity of hazardous waste stored on site and historically generated the facility, Peoples Cleaners is considered to be classified as a Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator (CESQG) at the time of the inspection. Peoples Cleaners now uses MCF as the primary transporter to deliver the facility
generated hazardous waste to the TDS facility. No waste manifests were available for review. Dry Cleaning Equipment Summary
Machine Number Type of Machine Manufacturer Model # Serial # Date (year) of manufacture Date (year) Of Installation Solvent used Observed Operating ?
1 Dry to dry RealStar

RS-260 60-B2-171 ? ? perc No
2 Dry to dry Aero-Tech USA 410 ? ? 2007 Perc No

(III) INSPECTION SUMMARY: On August 22, 2007, Eric Swope, Compliance Coordinator and Alicia Roh, Compliance Inspector, with the North Carolina Division of Waste Management, Dry Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA) Program conducted an outreach training visit at Peoples Cleaners. The inspectors met with Mr. Quillie Smith, store
owner, who provided the inspectors access to the facility’s equipment and available records. Peoples Cleaners had received an Outreach Visit from the DSCA Compliance program on March 13, 2007. An outreach Corrective Action letter, outlining the needed improvements required to ensure environmental compliance with the applicable MMP and RCRA regulations was sent by certified mail to Mr. Quillie Smith, owner of Peoples Cleaners, on March 15, 2007. No response was received by DSCA Compliance. A signed certified mail card was not received by DSCA compliance either. During the initial Outreach Visit, Mr. Smith explained that a fire had occurred at his store approximately 2 weeks prior. One of the dryers had caught fire during the night. Smoke and water damage were prevalent on site in the vicinity of the dry cleaning machines, washers and dryers. Since the fire incident, Mr. Smith stated that he was operating as a pickup location and another plant was performing the dry cleaning until he could get his plant back in operation. Mr. Smith had also received a letter in the mail from the DSCA cleanup program regarding a discovery of contamination on the property.
The Realstar RS-260 dry cleaning machine was operational but did not have secondary containment. Contact water from the dry cleaning machine was collected in an uncovered container that was not stored within spill containment. A lid from a waste drum was placed underneath the solvent pump to catch leaks/oil from the solvent pump. The Aero-Tech USA 410 dry cleaning machine was not operational but did have secondary containment. Water had accumulated in the spill containment underneath the Aerotech dry-cleaning machine, likely leftover from when the fire was extinguished. The carbon filter housings of the Aerotech dry cleaning machine were removed. Perc sensitivity was detected with the halogen leak detector in the vicinity of the open filter housings, and along the floor in front of the dry cleaning
machine where the vinyl tiles were removed. It was brought to Mr. Quillie Smith’s attention that vacuum pump condensate and contact water produced by mopping near
the dry cleaning machines were to be treated as contact water. The vacuum pump exhausted to the interior of the plant and the condensate was not collected and discharged to the floor. Mr. Smith was advised to begin collecting the vacuum pump condensate in a waste container and transfer to either a hazardous waste drum or treat on site utilizing a wastewater treatment unit (mister/evaporator). Wastewater treatment equipment was not used on site. The designated hazardous waste storage area was located in the boiler room. The waste drums were not stored within spill containment, were not labeled as hazardous waste, were not dated with the recommended accumulation start date, and were not properly sealed. Filters were placed in open waste drums that were not properly labeled or sealed. Depleted dry
cleaning machine filters were also observed in a waste dumpster behind the facility. Mr. Smith was also reminded to periodically empty the spotting table waste and dispose in a hazardous waste drum.
The Emergency Information Form (in case of a spill or other emergency) was provided to Mr. Quillie Smith, and he was instructed to complete and post this form close to the telephone. Absorbent spill clean-up materials were not available on site. The following records were kept onsite and were available for review: machine operation manual. The following records
were not kept onsite and were not available for review: perc purchase receipts, perc 12-month running total, Leak Detection and Repair log, receipts pertaining to equipment purchases, modifications and repairs, log of the condenser exit temperature, Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for solvents and spotting agents, Hazardous Waste Inspection Log, monthly Waste
Generation Log, and manifests for waste pickup. Mr. Smith did not maintain the required recordkeeping in the 2007 DSCA Calendar.
Machine maintenance concerns were noted during the outreach visit: Mr. Smith was not aware of where to read the condenser exit temperature or the proper high/low pressure gauge settings/readings for the refrigeration system. Mr. Smith was advised to contact his mechanic or the manufacturer of the dry cleaning machine regarding the refrigeration system readings, and to maintain all required recordkeeping for the facility in the 2007 DSCA Compliance calendar.
The following observations were noted by S. David Ross Sr. Air Quality Specialist, Mecklenburg County Air Quality, during his inspection on May 23, 2007: The facility was not operating in compliance, nor were records kept in compliance with the dry cleaning NESHAP found in 40 CFR 63 Subpart M. On-Site Equipment: RealStar 35 pound dry-to-dry machine
using perchloroethylene as the dry cleaning solvent. While operational, this unit was not operating during the inspection. There were clothes in the drum. Odors behind the machine indicated there are perceptible leaks. Mr. Smith indicated the machine's pump broke in March 2007 after the facility had a fire, and he was decommissioning the machine this week. Mr. Smith stated that he performs daily leak detection, but does not keep records of such. Aero-Tech 35-pound dry-to-dry machine using perchloroethylene as the dry cleaning solvent. This machine was delivered to the site in April 2007, but has not been installed, nor has it been loaded with perchloroethylene. Informed Mr. Smith that when this machine is made operational, he will have to perform records of weekly leak detection, any repairs made, operating conditions, quantitative emissions due to leaks, and concentration of perchloroethylene in drum at end of wash/dry cycle. Record Review: Mr. Smith was given copies of the DSCA calendars, but has not been keeping the records. He was informed that the record keeping is mandatory, and the calendars are a convenient place to keep them. Part of the record keeping is perchloroethylene purchases. Mr. Smith stated that he has been acting as a pick-up store for a year or more. Most of his work he has taken to Park Square Cleaners and Uptown Cleaners, according to Mr. Smith. Other Issues: Mr. Smith was informed that when the Aero-Tech dry cleaning machine becomes operational, he will have to use a quantitative perchloroethylene detector as specified in 40 CFR 63.322 - "Standards" paragraph (o) - "Additional Requirements." When asked where he can get one, I directed him to his dry
cleaning equipment/supplies provider. A Notice of Violation (NOV) was issued for Failure to perform leak detection and make appropriate repairs, and failure to record leak detection and perc purchases. During a follow-up re-inspection, the following observations were noted by S. David Ross Sr. Air Quality Specialist, Mecklenburg County Air Quality, on October 29, 2007: No operational violations were noted; however, the facility still is not keeping records required by the MACT. During the inspection, facility owner Mr. Smith stated that he had returned from a funeral, and this was not a good time to discuss the matter. Another copy of MCAQ's dry cleaner registration from was left with Mr. Smith, as well as a business card with David Ross's MCAQ address and phone number so assistance can be
provided in completing the application. When asked if Mr. Smith has a copy of the State's Dry Cleaner Calendar in the store, he pulled it off the desk, and stated that he is not using it. Mr. Smith stated that the RealStar perchloroethylene dry cleaning machine, which had leaks as represented by the presence of odors during the May 23, 2007 inspection, no longer is used.
The machine still sits in place in the store. It was not operating during this inspection. Mr. Smith stated that he now uses the AeroTech dry cleaning machine, which was not yet operational during the May 23, 2007 inspection. There were no odors detected around this machine during this inspection. A Notice of Violation (NOV) was issued for Failure to perform leak detection and make appropriate repairs, and failure to record leak detection and perc purchases. The following is a summary of Peoples Cleaner’s compliance with respect to the DSCA Required Minimum Management Practices provided in 15A NCAC 02S.0202, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) referenced in 40 CFR part 261.5 and 262. Mecklenburg County Air Quality has previously determined Peoples Cleaner’s compliance status
regarding the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) found in 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart M requirements.
MMPs: 15A NCAC 02S .0202 The Realstar, 3rd Generation dry cleaning machine was fitted with a closed container solvent transfer system, a refrigerated condenser, but without secondary containment (Pictures 3, 4). This machine was de-energized and was no
longer in use. The Aerotech, 3rd Generation dry cleaning machine was fitted with a closed container solvent transfer system, a refrigerated condenser, and secondary containment (Picture 5). Separator (contact) water from the Aerotech dry cleaning machine was collected in an uncovered container that was stored inside the spill containment of the machine (Picture 6). The vacuum pump condensate that was previously discharged onto the floor was manually drained and collected in a dual container system (Picture 8). The onsite wastewater treatment unit (Galaxy mister) was not located within spill containment and no maintenance log was kept (Picture 9). Excess contact water was stored in a 13 gallon drum that was
not stored within spill containment (Picture 10). Dry cleaning machine lint filter debris observed disposed in an uncovered 5-gallon bucket located behind the Aerotech machine (Picture 13).
A sump drain was observed located behind the facility exterior. Slight perc sensitivity detected was detected in the drain. Contact water possibly had been discharged into the drain previously (Picture 16). A dumpster was also observed outside the facility. The bottom of the dumpster was severely corroded with portions of the base missing. Evidence of
prior perc waste disposal was detected in the dumpster (Picture 14). Spill containment was not installed underneath/around each container that contained waste. The Emergency Information form was not prominently posted inside the facility. Adsorbent spill cleanup supplies were not readily available on site. The following records were kept and available for review: None. Underground storage tanks associated with the dry cleaning plant on the property were not observed. (RCRA) Hazardous Waste Regulations: 40 CFR Part 261.5 and 262
The hazardous waste storage area was located in the boiler room. Although several of the drums were empty, drums containing waste were not labeled as hazardous waste, were not dated (recommended), not adequately sealed, and not stored within spill containment (Picture 11). The drums that contained waste were one full 15-gallon liquid waste drum, and two 15-gallon waste drums containing depleted cartridge filters.
A hazardous waste drum was observed behind the Aerotech machine. The drum contained waste, and was not labeled, not dated (recommended), not adequately sealed, and not stored within spill containment (Picture 12). Strong perc odor was detected.
Excess waste drums was observed at the back of the property near the dumpster. The drums appeared empty, or filling with rainwater (Picture 15).
The following records were available for review: None. A review of a manifest history from April 1, 2007 to August 29, 2008, provided by MCF, indicated that 180 pounds of waste were removed on May 8, 2007. During the inspection visit, Mr. Quillie Smith stated that waste had not been picked up since the initial Outreach Visit in
March 2007. Operations resumed approximately 3-4 months after the initial Outreach Visit. NESHAP: 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart M
Although Mecklenburg County Air Quality (MCAQ) retains the authority to inspect and enforce the NESHAP regulations, the following potential violations were observed by the DSCA inspectors. The potential violations will be
referred to Mecklenburg County Air Quality. The owner/operation manuals for the dry cleaning machines were not available at the time of the inspection. The owner
was not using the 2008 DSCA Compliance Calendar, and did use the 2007 DSCA Compliance Calendar. None of the required monitoring had been performed and the required logs/records have not been kept. (perc purchase receipts, 12-month running total of perc purchases, condenser exit temp log, LDAR log). Although the Realstar machine had
been de-energized, the machine contained solvent/waste solvent. Therefore the machine was still ‘active’ by definition. The Aero-Tech machine was operating at the time of the inspection. Inspectors used the TIF halogen detector to determine if perc vapors were present inside the facility. The TIF monitor indicated sensitivity (presence of perc vapors) at the following locations during the inspection: Aerotech Machine: Strong sensitivity was detected around the ‘funnel’ (where non-virgin solvent can be added into the machine), and a pressurized air line that the owner stated was ‘circulating’ air through the drum.
Based on a review of the MCAQ report, the Aerotech machine was delivered to the site in April 2007, and was in operation by October 2007. Therefore DSCA understands that this was a 3rd Generation machine installed after December 2005, and would require a non-vented secondary carbon adsorber or equivalent control device.
(IV) CONCLUSIONS: Based on observations documented by the DSCA Inspector during the August 22, 2008 inspection, it is believed that Peoples Cleaners is in violation of the following regulations:
MMPs - 15A NCAC 02S.0202 (b)(1) Discharging water/wastes containing dry-cleaning solvent into the sewer or land of the state. (b)(1) Failure to maintain complete and current invoices for waste disposal and/or documentation of on site waste treatment if a proper device is utilized. (b)(2) Failure to install spill containment under and around all dry cleaning machines and waste solvent storage areas by January 1, 2002. (b)(2) Failure to maintain emergency spill cleanup materials and an emergency response plan on the premises. (V) RECOMMENDATIONS: A Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement, (NOV/NRE) was issued to
Peoples Cleaners for violations of the DSCA MMPs. It is recommended that a follow up inspection be conducted in November 2008 to establish compliance. If the facility is in non-compliance at that time, it is recommended that an enforcement action be initiated by DSCA, or if necessary, terminate the clean-up agreement. If no response to the NOV/NRE issued by DSCA is received, it is recommended that a follow up inspection occur the first week of July and that immediate Enforcement action be initiated for non-compliance.

REFERENCE 8
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
Dry Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA) Compliance Program
Inspection Report
Date: 1/11/2018

Facility Identification
Peoples Cleaners
Facility ID: 600017C
EPA Generator ID: NCD986188084
County/FIPS: Mecklenburg/119
DSCA Cleanup ID: DC600006
Facility Data
Peoples Cleaners
1930 Beatties Ford Road
Charlotte NC 28216
Lat: 35.261722 Long: -80.854583
SIC: 7216 / Dry Cleaning Plants, Except Rugs
NAICS: 81232/ Dry Cleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated)
Date of Facility Establishment: 1990
Compliance Data
Inspection Date: 1/11/2018
Time In: 08:30 AM Time Out: 09:00 AM
Inspectors: Aram Kim, Neshonda Cobbs
Operating Status: OO/Operating
Compliance Codes: In Violation of MMP
Action Code: 01/Inspection
Contact Data Classification Data
Service Type: Pickup (Full Service Inactive)
Solvent: Perchloroethylene
System: Dry-to-Dry
Installation Date:
Installation Category: New
Consumption Category: Small
HW Generator Status: CESQG
Facility Contact
Quillie Smith
1930 Beatties Ford Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28269
[phone]
Facility Owner
Quillie Smith
1930 Beatties Ford Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28269
[phone]
Property Owner
Quillie Smith
1930 Beatties Ford Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28269
[phone]
Inspector’s Signature:

Date of Signature: 1/11/18

Comments:
NOV/NRE will be issued for repeated violations.

(I) DIRECTIONS: From the Mooresville Regional Office at 610 East Center Avenue in Mooresville, go west on East
Center Avenue. Turn left onto S. Main St. (NC-152). Turn right onto W. McClelland Ave. (NC-152). Turn left onto NC-
150. Merge onto I-77 South. Merge onto I-85 S via Exit 13B toward Spartanburg and take the Beatties Ford Rd. exit- (Exit
37). Turn right onto Beatties Ford Rd and the dry cleaning facility is located on the left at 1930 Beatties Ford Road.

(II) FACILITY HISTORY: Peoples Cleaners has been operated by Mr. Quillie Smith, since approximately 1990. Peoples
Cleaners was previously a bakery and fish market (1985-1990), and a filling station from the 1950’s to around 1985.
PCE/TCE contamination has been discovered on this property, and the site (60-0006) has been deferred to the Inactive
Hazardous Sites Branch. Mr. Smith explained that a fire had occurred at his store in March 2007. In 2012 thedry cleaning
operation became inactive and continued to function as a pick-up store. The Garments that require dry cleaning are taken
to Bennett's Ultra Cleaners.

Solvent History:
Solvent Dates Used
Perchloroethylene 1990 to Present

Previous Inspections:
Date Visit Type Violation
Type(s)
Worst Violation(s) Action(s)
Taken
Response
Due
Received
Date
Inspector
3/10/2016 Inspection MMP No spill containment
under four 15-gallon
drums.
NOV sent
on
3/17/2016
4/8/2016 N/A or
Not Rec'd
Jack
Kitchen
CHKLST
sent on
3/10/2016
None
3/5/2015 Inspection MMP No spill containment CHKLST
sent on
3/6/2015
3/27/2015 N/A or
Not Rec'd
Jack
Kitchen
8/22/2008 Inspection MMP Release, no spill pan
for DC machine,
recordkeeping
NOVNRE
sent on
9/10/2008
9/24/2008 9/23/2008 Alicia
Roh
3/13/2007 Outreach
Training
Visit
MMP Release, no spill pan
for DC machine,
recordkeeping
CAL sent
on
3/15/2007
4/2/2007 N/A or
Not Rec'd
Eric
Swope

Complaints: None

DSCA Sampling: None

(III) FACILITY CLASSIFICATION:

NESHAP INSTALLATION CATEGORY – New: Peoples Cleaners utilizes a 3rd Generation dry-to-dry dry cleaning
machine that was installed in 2007. Since the dry cleaning machine was installed after December 9, 1991, the dry
cleaning machine is classified as a 'New' machine installation.

Dry Cleaning Equipment Summary
No Type of
Machine
Gen Manufacturer
(Mfr)
Model # Serial # Mfr
Date
Install
Date
End
Date
Solvent Used Observed
Operating?
1 Dry-to-
Dry
3rd RealStar RS-260 60-B2-
171
-- -- 2012 Perchloroethylene Removed
2 Dry-to-
Dry
3rd Aero-Tech
USA
410 -- -- 2007 N/A Perchloroethylene No

NESHAP SOURCE CATEGORY - SMALL: Peoples Cleaners is classified as a Small Area Source because it
purchased less than 140 gallons of perc during the previous 12-month period. Based on a review of the receipts for the
past year, Peoples Cleaners did not purchase any perc in the last 12 months.

HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR CATEGORY - CESQG: Peoples Cleaners is classified as a Conditionally
Exempt Small Quantity Generator (CESQG) because the facility has routinely generated less than 220 pounds of waste
per month during the past 12 months, and stores less than 2,200 pounds of hazardous waste on site. XXXX full 15-
gallon drums of hazardous waste were observed on site at the time of the inspection (approx. 250 lbs). The facility
utilizes an onsite wastewater treatment unit (WWTU) to dispose of facility-generated contact water.

(IV) INSPECTION SUMMARY: On January 11, 2018, Aram Kim and Neshonda Cobbs, Compliance Inspectors, with
the North Carolina Division of Waste Management, Dry Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA) Program conducted a
Compliance Inspection at Peoples Cleaners. The inspectors met with Mr. Quillie Smith, store owner, who provided the
inspector access to the facility's equipment and available records.

The Realstar RS-260 3rd generation dry cleaning machine was removed from the facility in 2012. The Aero-Tech USA dry-
to-dry 3rd generation dry cleaning machine (picture 1) is remained on site. Even though the machine is still connected to
power, the solvent tanks appeared to be empty of perc and the machine has not been in operation since 2012. The facility
continues to be operated as a pickup store only. All garments are sent to Bennett Ultra Cleaners to be cleaned. The facility
boiler remains nonfunctional at the time of the inspection.

Multiple 15-gallon waste drums were observed inside the boiler room at the rear of the facility (picture 2). Three 15-gallon
hazardous perc waste drums appeared to contain liquid waste or waste filters from the perc dry cleaning machines. It was
difficult to check how full each drum was due to the limited light and access space in the boiler room. Two waste drums
which could be storing waste were not stored within spill containment and three drums were stored within inadequate spill
containment. The inspectors explained to the owner that the drums containing waste should be either removed by the
licensed waste hauler or stored within adequately sized spill containment for 15-gallon drums. The inspectors briefly
discussed the decommissioning process of the facility with the owner.

The inspectors provided contact information of several licensed waste haulers for Mr. Smith. The dry cleaning machine has
not been in use for at least 5 years and no dry cleaning waste had been removed from the facility in the past three years.
Logbooks for leak inspections, repairs, and monitoring have not been kept or required. Perc had not been purchased since
2012.

Emergency information form was completed and posted on site. Emergency spill cleanup material was stored on site.

The following is a summary of Peoples Cleaners' compliance with respect to the DSCA Required Minimum Management
Practices provided in 15A NCAC 02S.0202 and Recovery Act (RCRA) referenced in 40 CFR part 261.5 and 262. It was
strongly recommended that Mr. Quillie Smith contact Mecklenburg County Air Quality with questions regarding Peoples
Cleaners' compliance with the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) found in 40 CFR Part
63 Subpart M requirements.

MMP VIOLATIONS - 15A NCAC 02S.0202

1. Spill containment was not installed under and around the waste solvent storage containers.

2. The spill containment being utilized has a volumetric capacity less than 110 percent of the largest container that
it is storing.

NESHAP VIOLATIONS - 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart M
NOTE: The Mecklenburg County Air Quality Program retains the authority to determine the facility's NESHAP compliance
status.

None

RCRA VIOLATIONS - Hazardous Waste Regulations: 40 CFR Part 262.34
None

(V) CONCLUSIONS: Based on observations documented by the DSCA Inspectors during the January 11, 2018 inspection,
Peoples Cleaners is currently in violation of the following regulations:

MMPs - 15A NCAC 02S.0202
(b)(2) Failure to maintain spill containment under and around the waste solvent storage area by January 1,
2002 [15 NCAC 0202 (b)(2)]. Spill containment shall have a volumetric capacity of 110 percent of
the largest vessel, tank, or container within the spill containment area and shall be capable of
preventing the release of the applicable dry cleaning solvent beyond the spill containment area for a
period of at least 72 hours.
(b)(2) Failure to install spill containment with a volumetric capacity of 110 percent of the largest vessel,
tank, or container within the spill containment area and capable of preventing the release of the
applicable dry cleaning solvent beyond the spill containment area for a period of at least 72 hours. [15
NCAC 0202 (b)(2)].

NESHAP - 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart M
NOTE: The Mecklenburg County Air Quality Program retains the authority to determine the facility's NESHAP compliance
status.

None

RCRA- Hazardous Waste Regulations: 40 CFR Part 261 - 262
None

(VI) ENFORCEMENT HISTORY (Penalties): None

(VII) RECOMMENDATIONS: A DSCA Compliance Program Checklist (#02532) was issued to Mr. Quillie Smith,
owner of Peoples Cleaners, indicating the compliance issues to be addressed. A Notice of Violation (NOV)/Notice of
Recommendation for Enforcement (NRE) will be issued to Mr. Quillie Smith for the violations observed during the
inspection. DSCA Supervisors will determine if enforcement and civil penalties are warranted after reviewing a written
response from Peoples Cleaners. A follow-up inspection should be conducted by January 11, 2019 to confirm compliance.

(VIII) PHOTOGRAPHS:
Picture 1: Aero-Tech USA 3rd generation dry-to-dry dry cleaning machine. Machine has not been in operation since 2012.
Machine is partially decommissioned, but still connected to electricity.

Picture 2: Several 15-gallon hazardous waste drums observed inside the boiler room. Three drums appeared to be partially
full of liquid and or filter waste. Spill containment was either not installed or not adequate.

REFERENCE 9
JUL-25-1996 09=03 902
f._ ...:SIMILE TRANSMISSION
COVER PAGE
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
CRIMINAL fNVESTIGA TlON DIVISION
GROUP 902/NORTH-SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT
6635 EXECUTIVE CIRCLE DRIVE. SUITE 180
CHARLOTIE, NORTH CAROLINA 28212
VOICE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
From; [ J
[ ]
{<~
r. ]
[ ]
l ]
Michael Lutz, Group Manager
Cynthia Fish
Johnny Gregory
Betty Hollingworth
Floyd Mitchell
Other
Other
[ 1 Tom Novota
[ ] Dennis 0 • Dell
[ 1 Brenda Shore
[ ] Jeff Smith
[ ] Kathy Sorrell
[ ] David Sousa
To: f ~· !;:±~...:L..:!::.-::':i:;.....--zr--, __ ______.~
nate: r 7/r;!(r 6 ]
Transmitted:[ 7 pages+ cover]
P.01
Contents; [ & ~ d lSC U.t£,d, 4~ z:r C.-:fJ fl? IE t!ottAt I~.< fii<FetY71f '!11 e ,,..,,~~
~rdi!~-; ":~~w~~(ik1J L_'!. __ --~-_ _5_.u_QbJ_ __ Sm5~e2~,r tf1
This communication is intended for the sole use of the individual to whom it is addressed and may
contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law. lf the reader of this commwtication is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent for
delivering the communication to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this conm\unication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone call and
return the communication to the address above via the United States Postal Service.
nlffC.-frfVl1 1 u~inlfVS P/I{ ~eed cOft€'!. It-rtrftet( c/,c.u,lf{"ttV'tJ lfl C»0. 5'6~ .. 5/f.],
'1lle cf'Pdr~~~twr pe~-h )'o sell )'},t 1'-"~~{;;tt f" '115 o111 J?lfF'J ;r twt..r:-~
c 1111 ljlt{ f!Yt. as some t''dl!l'llc.e... 1~71?rf l,relf1
JUL-25-1996 09:04 902 P.02
....
-. >
Ulf:tTBD STATES DlS'l'RICT COURT
WES'l'ERN DiftUCI' 01' ROR'l'H OAAOLnfA
CJIAlU.Oirrl DIVUXOif .. _
FILED
CHMLCm'£. N.C.
~·· \,iourt (;\IIJII'h ._.. •' "',
W Dil' of N. c.
CIVXL tfO. l: 93CV198-MU
. UfU'l'ED li'l'ATE5 OF NmftlCA,
Plaintiff,
v.
)
)
)
)
)
)
1930 BEA'rl'IIS PORD ROAD, )
CIIARID1'1'E, ROJl1!'8 CAROLINA, AS )
IIORE PARTic:vu.Jt.LY DESCRIBED AS )
LOTS lA, lB, lC, 2A ARD 28, )
.BLOCK 1, LDlC!OtJf Hl!:tCHTS, nP )
8001<. 3, PAGE 288, AS :RBCORDBD )
IN DIED BOOK 5608, PAGE 194, )
MICKLBHBURG COUM'l'I fUBLXC )
.REGZS'l'RY' )
Defendant.
)
)
THXS MATTER i~ before tb• ~ upon P1a1nt1t~•• MO~ion ~or
Final J\ldca-nt of Forfeitura1 filed March ..fJL 1994, and it
appearing 1:bat the Vnited states Jlar&bal published notiae of tbis
•otion in accordanc. with law and tllat due notice waa :p~:operly
•a4e, the D:Rlrt tinds:
1. Tbat prooess was 4Uly is5ued in this aation •nd ~t the
Detendent v.s duly aei•ed by th• Uni~ad States Rarebal
pura~t to •aid process;
2. .Tbat no penon (other tJlan tile cn.arlotte-ar.ckleabuq Tax
Collector) have filed any clai• or uswer within tbe tiae
fhaa4 by lavr
3. 'tbat the tJni 'tlld states stipulated i:o 1:he iilterest of the
Cbarlotte-HeckleftbUrg Tax Collector,
4. 11Jat the vnlted. s~·~·· hnbe):' -~ipu1·~-~0 t=h• in~.re.~
of Quillie Smitb in tbis action, despite his failur-e to
file a claim and answe~;
5. Tbe allegations of the eo-plaint are taken aa adaittedJ
and,
4. ~ aetion. token by the unite4 state• and it• •geata,
im:l.udi119 any ota-t• anA local. law •n:row-o.......t o:rri.ola1s ..
JUL-25-1996 09:04 902 P.03
-· .. . ' "·-·
~ war• reasonable, proper, anci in good fai~b, in accordance
with 28 u.s.c. I 2465. J •· .
BaRd upon the above fi.ndinqs. IT IS • 11BRBBY. OltDDBD11
ADJUDGED .UD OICIEID;
1.. That final judpeai: i• hereby entered ago1Mt the Del.n-
dant. ( u .ore particularl.y clea<n'~ in paravnpb 4 of
the COJiplaint lor J'orf•iture .iD Ru filed. by the United
states in this action), and all right, tlt1e, and
int~=st in said Def~ndan~, e:xcept as ~~lJ' set fofth
herein, is now v .. t.ed and haa been vested ainue 1:ha date
of the first criainal oet tiVii'MJ raice t.u ~is forfeiture
in the United StateR of america1 ·
2. 'l'bat th.a interest of the Cbal"lotte-M•ckl.nlnu:9 Tax
COllector i• to :be paid out of the proceeds txoa the
dispo•ition of the Defendant, o~ auch otba~ aaurca of
t'Und• as the Vnited. fta.tea Harahel de-apprgp~i•t.• ancl
in accordance with 1aw1 said inte~et of the Cha.rlotte-
Mecklenbu%'9 Tax coll.c:tozo is to be deteminecl by ~
United St•tes Kanh&l un12er local, st.te, and fedaJ!'a1 law
at the ti.e of final di•po•ition of the DetendantJ
J. That the specific sua of $9, l7a. 00 w1 tbout J.n~erest 1a to
be paid tg Quillie Slllith, by and through his attomay ~
Sol Levine, laq •• upon ~inal dispo~~ition o;C the Defen•
dant, after all. costs of the United St:atu voveX'2'aaADt are
tint nc::overecl and all intereet of tbe Charlotte-
MeckleMuJ:9 Tax Collector an pai4J
3. Tb•~ any an4 all Gt:bea!' pe~ONt olabinw any ript, tiUe,
or int•~•t in or to the De.tendaft~ u. benby held in
default;
4. That na other right. title, or interest in the Defenr!ant
&M.ll.~exiet exce~Jt for thoaa &XpN1J8ly set torth hereilu
andr
JUL-25-1996 09:05 902
Mr. Quillie Smi~h
1930 Beatties Ford Road
Charloete, NC 28216
J
U.S. Departmerat" .ustice
Ap:t"il 24, 1.995
Re: Case Number 3:93CV198
Dea.r Mr. Smith:
P.04
'It has come to our attention t.hat no payment hae :been
recei 11ed since March 13 , l.!i 95 • AccoNing to the rental. agreement,
your rent payments of $900. oo are due the first Qe each month.
Thus, on May l, 1995, you are respOnSible to pay $900.00 for the
month of April and $900.00 for the month of May. We will axpect
payment in the amount of $1,800-00, payable ~o the U.S. Marshals
Service and mailed to the addrass in the letterhead above so that
~t is received on or before May 9, 1995.
I understand that you hava been in eommunications with the
Inter-nal Revenue Service. Perhaps you del.ayed l)ayment since there
will be a transfer to that office.
Be odvia•d, hgwever, tbct.t our office received a note J::t:om IRS
which indicating that they will only Qe responsible for collection
of the rent from Mr. Smith ft:'CICI\ the date that they take posseasion of the .suhj eot property from the O'SMS •
I see that my la•t ~ette~ to YQU, dated February 22, ·1995,
inforrued you stated, •payments should be made payable to the U.S.
Marshals Service until you are notified that IRS does in fact bave
custody of thte subject property. '' That. etatement st.11~ applies.
Sincerely,
Property Management Specialist
cc·: Johnny Gregory, Internal Revenue Service
cc: Frad HUd$on, United States Attorn~'& Office
I _ ~-2719%
~~.
902
Mr. Ouillie smith
1930 Beatties Vord ~ad
Cha:r:lotte, NC
)
O.S..Deparbaeatof Jusdce
United Slates .Marsbals Sc=rvice
We,..,.. Dfnrlct D/ Ntmh CarollluJ
u..w .... c...-...
lfMIOIU,._,
'-ro.litot .... 7/fl
~.NtNIAC'4Nfi!M 3102
February 22, 1995
Re: 3 : 9 3CV'198, 193 0 B&ATTISS FOIU) ROAD, cmuu:.oTTE
Dear Mr. Smith:
P.05
The above mentioned property was forfeited March 22, 1994.
It was discussed in a meeting with IRS on Cecember 19 and was the
subject of a letter eo IRS dated December ~&, and was discussed
aga~n in the meetin~· with IRS on Feb~ 2, 1995. ·
Apparently, the Internal Revenue Service is very aware that
this property is an IRS, Depa~t of 'l'ra;a11u:ry, case; and thay
have the ~ights to acqui~ cuatody of same.
we are currently inqui:r:ing ae to the status of the OltDD. TO
S'DBS'!'I"fO"tB C'O'S':ODDN. We will not officially transfer the ~ope.rty
tc IRS until we ha~e a filea ~opy of same.
Our office had a sale contract and were intending to close
and simply forward the proceeds to Internal Reavenue Service
EXecutive Otfice. S&id contract was signed by you, the proEipec;:tive
buyer, on November 9, 1994. The United States Attorney1 a Office
appr(W'ed the sale of the property to you. Yotll! ofl.•r. which
indicated a selling prica of fl.OO, 00 0. 00, wa• acc:ept•d by the OSMS,
and the closing was to be on or betore January 31, 19~5. lboleVer,
it is QU~ unde;r;standin.g thilt you requested t:llat our office consider
an extension to the contract, but our office is net willing to do
ao.
we are, by copy of thie letter, informing certain parties of
this cleci.sion. eo ltOT renew the ~:ontrac:t, and we a.J;e in•tead wai,ieg
o~ ~~ ~ Sub&tit.'!,te CUgt;gd;tan so !;ha& the f!iooert;v cap be turnf!d QDi a; IRS. We are also reminding and in ~ng the same
parties of the del~n~cy in your rent payments.
JUL-25-1996 09:06 902
BEiqT DRJ•INQORICY
R.BNTAL AGREEMENT, COPY A"rrACBBJ:), UIDICATBD $900.00 PER MONTH.
PROM MR. QUIJ;,I,IB SMITH TO tl9MS BRQDIHXW P/'l./93 •
. I count .1.8 months fro10 and irlc~uding september, 1.993 to and
inc1~ng February. 1994. Meaning 18 X $900 • $1,.200.00. The
aMOunt of rent :received. is $6,110.00. The cUfference, the
delinquency. thereto~, is ll.2la.QO.
Of course, there is the negotiation which al~owed $9,1?2.00
to be disbursed to you upon t:he cloein9 of the propert-y pu:r:suant. to
the Orde~ dated 3/16/94. However, it goes without saying that
$9,l72.00 is less than $9,250.00, eo there will be nothing ~aid TO
you from ths sale of tbe property.
YOQ owe $78.00. and with aach pa•a~g month beginning and
including March, J.995, the debt to the united States increases
$900.00. Whether the Internal .ReV"anue. Service enters into a
selling eontr~ct with you or nQt, you are accountable. to pay your
rent obligation.
Ne wi~l accept $78.00 for your arrearage in your FebrQary,
1995 rent, and $900.00 is due March 1, 1995. Payments should be
made payable t:o u.s_ Marahala S&:rvic:e until you a.re notifia<1 that
IRS does iq fact have custody of the subject property.
Thi~ prgperty will be taken off the market by our contr•et
Ccmpan¥ as of February 24, ~995-Thie property wil1 become ~he
responsiQility of the Internal Revanua Sa%Vioe somet::i.ma the3:'"o.-ftor.
we are waiting for the Order to SUbstitute CUstodian, and IRS
cannoe assume CWiJtody until. that point.
Sincerely,
WALTER B. EDMISTEN
·unit sta~
y; JAnG ftltlLLBR
.Asset Forfeiture Specialist
AttaeblneJlt: Copy of Rental Agree11lftnt:
copy with attacbmant to:
P.06
Mr. Johnny Gregory, Internal Revenue Service-~~~~~
Mr. Edwil_l Hunter, Realtor.. ?J ~ ~~.? ...,
l"z:'ank 'Mhi tney, AtJSA ....J
The attoxuey who wx:ote on behalf of Mr. SUdth, sol Levine
Deputy tJni ted States Marshal Steve Gladden
*Note to Mr. Hunter; Plea~te take the property off the mcu:ket:. we
'-Fill. info%lla }"'01a' of"fice of other developments as well. _
JUL-25-1996 09=06 902
-. ..
•r:wnw•=
~-t: ·ta t:be P:~-4 WS~ IIIC I t: ••• ~ era t·tt'!r.tf1 _,
!let:wa-. ~ OCc:upul.t: aDd 'tba-U.U.'blll!! St:aw• ~-~
(._) , 11: is. agraad. tlaa'l:' ._ a COIIIUtiaa of caat'l EIUIId ac=t'\\penC!" ..
tba QO.,._t w.t.ll. be ~•ibl.e. ·~J:" tall JWQD ;t o~ •11 zwew
-·r~~ to~ ate ar aeJ.~ az ~ pi:OJIC:tj" br tDe Ua.Ltad.
Stat a • lflla'bal.s serrtca-. RlliDtal ,._ tnll bill .ada peya&ll• to 1:l2a
P.07
-ttaitalt Stat:ea. ~ br t1.t'le al.7'. Mid:. 1d.11. '-..... uaar:dell t:G t:tae
-_: V.lta.& Stac.a ,._...1• SeJ:"'tc:.t at' 1:tle ~ apac~~1ed below or
.. -~ ta aur Sucb. .-rsoa o:r: .ea.t.:Lt1.88 ... •r -...-cs~1-br the ttui ta4 ~ Sbrt'ea' lfaZ'abals se~tca. ·
Oc J'iiHQta. 1JDCl!arataad tbat" _,. a~tr 4••o•it:.. ........_ raaotal,
L• 1 p&J nt:• or .ar g~-* -j--~ .,_ 4Jl.tCIIItle,
.-tell .....-paid to -.r pw&a~ or ..etti• pno~ to ttaa sei~NZt~ bY'
tSie U'lai'tlld: ::.IStart.a **'ell•il·• ~--lillie~ \! SII$EUI'il..tey err
t:1a U'll1.tad. Rates .. I II• ~ en:-'tla ~'bill • .._
Clc:Riw"• zt.
'JI:r' t:t.-oe ear ~ ae tat::. _., 1. • r •• :IIIII:' ~ • r • ,, ... a rtwc:w ~ f!4 t=--...;L:I t'·• eoe.. -'*-• u~t~ wc.P ~l. J:a:D•• co.u:t: •5CIM1a-rt • r Na en ,., ... • ~ 1a:'tiQ1.: .e.
~ = I: ~:' ::~ = ~¥.1Wi,., ~ ia --t:!la ~ I .,
Oc:Qa-t. ....., adllltaJ.edgnnt t1aa1: t:tl1.-. 42': •• ••t: ,._ ._. ~ .. ........, •'taal4.. ..-ay:z ad t::u .-.r 1:11at oec•a.-ata ~ -.a. t:aai-....:~
wLUJ. • ggpr ot au. a ag:J:• st.
All XMrta or c:o:r:z:aa~ ~ 1M Co:c'NIIU'da4 to:
U'lli.t:a4 Stat .. ~· S'ea:Yice P.O. ~ 710 ~. NC 28802. (704)2.71-tan
.ln'N: .J•~ MU.l.c
Da1:a .. ;: .. 2s~2 .?·
TOTAL P.07

REFERENCE 10

REFERENCE 11

REFERENCE 12

REFERENCE 13
&, ~A ~;;~~
NCDE_N_R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Dexter R. Matthews, Director Division of Waste Management
March 8, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT
QUILLIE SMITH I SOL LEVINE
1930 BEATTIES FORD RD
CHARLOTTE, NC 28216
RE: Discovery of Dry-Cleaning Contamination
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
The Division of Waste Management has received information indicating dry-cleaning solvent
contamination at 1930 Beatties Ford Rd, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County. Unless further
investigation proves the contamination is from a source not originating from this property, you as
the dry cleaner or property owner are considered a potentially responsible party (PRP) and liable
for the costs of any assessment and remediation.
You have a choice in deciding under which of the two state environmental over-site programs
the assessment and remediation of the contamination will be managed:
Dry-Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA) Program -Sites contaminated with dry-cleaning
solvent may be eligible for access to the DSCA Fund.
• The majority of the assessment and remediation costs will be covered by the Fund minus
a deductible and co-pay.
• The DSCA Program will manage the cleanup of the site.
• The site's priority ranking will dictate when the site will be cleaned up to risk-based
standards.
Inactive Hazardous Sites (IHS) Program -Property owners, business owners or business
operators that decide not to participate in the DSCA Program will be placed in the IHS Program
by default.
• The PRP may cover all of the costs of assessment and remediation.
Please direct any questions or correspondence to:
Division of Waste Management
Attn: Niki Fountain
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
[phone]
1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Phone [phone]\ FAX [phone]\ Internet http://wastenotnc.org
An Equal Opportunity I Affirmative Action Employer-Printed on Dual Purpose Recycled Paper
~.'
Contamination Discovery Letter
March 8, 2007
DSCA Site 060-0006
QUILLIE SMITH I SOL LEVINE Page 2
If we do not receive a reply from you within 60 days, the site will be placed on the IHS
Program's site list and you will be responsible for all costs of assessment and remediation.
Sincerely, G'lAJu·~
Niki Fountain
DSCA Project Manager
cc:

REFERENCE 14
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
Dry Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA) Compliance Program
Outreach Inspection Report
Date: 03/13/2007
Facility Identification
Peoples Cleaners
Facility ID: 600017C
DAQ ID:
EPA Generator ID: NCD986188084
County/FIPS: Mecklenburg/119
Facility Data
Peoples Cleaners
1930 Beatties Ford Road
Charlotte, NC 28269
Lat: 35m 15d 42.2s Long: 80m 51d 16.5s
SIC : 7216 / Dry Cleaning Plants, Except Rugs
NAICS: 81232 / Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated)
Date of Facility Establishment: ~ 1990
Compliance Data
Inspection Date: 03/13/2007
Time In: 1:18 pm Time Out: 3:30 pm
Inspector(s): ECS/ADR
Operating Status: O/Operating
Compliance Code(s): M-MMP violation

Action Code: 00/ Outreach Training visit
Contact Data Classification Data
Solvent: Perchloroethylene
System: Dry-to-Dry
Installation Date: ??
Installation Category: Existing
Consumption Category: Small
HW Generator Status : CESQG
DSCA Site Number : N/A
Facility Contact
Quillie Smith
1930 Beatties Ford Road
Charlotte, NC 28269
[phone]

Facility Owner
Quillie Smith
1930 Beatties Ford Road
Charlotte, NC 28269
[phone]

Property Owner
Quillie Smith & Sol
Levine
1930 Beatties Ford Road
Charlotte, NC 28269
[phone]

Inspector’s Signature:

Date of Signature:
Comments:
Outreach CA letter issued by certified mail 3/19/2007?
(MMPs and RCRA procedural and recordkeeping requirements)

NESHAP Status to be determined by Mecklenburg Co. AQ
Recommend follow up inspection no later than March 2008

(I) DIRECTIONS: From the Mooresville Regional Office at 610 East Center Avenue in Mooresville, go west on East
Center Avenue. Turn left onto S. Main St. (NC-152). Turn right onto W. McClelland Ave. (NC-152). Turn left onto
NC-150. Merge onto I-77 South. Merge onto I-85 S via Exit 13B toward Spartanburg and take the Beatties Ford Rd. exit-
(Exit 37). Turn right onto Beatties Ford Rd and the dry cleaning facility is located on the left at 1930 Beatties Ford Road.

(II) FACILITY DESCRIPTION: Peoples Cleaners is classified as an existing small dry cleaner facility, which has been
operated by Mr. Quillie Smith, since approximately 1990. Peoples Cleaners was previously a bakery and fish market
(1985-1990), and a filling station from the 1950’s to around 1985.

Peoples Cleaners has two dry-to-dry dry cleaning machines installed on site. Although the Realstar RS-260 dry cleaning
machine was operational, it was not in use during the outreach visit and was not installed within secondary containment.
The Aero-Tech USA 410 dry cleaning machine was not operational but did have secondary containment. Based on the
quantity of hazardous waste stored on site and historically generated the facility, Peoples Cleaners is considered to be
classified as a Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator (CESQG) at the time of the inspection. Peoples Cleaners
uses Safety Kleen as the primary transporter to deliver the facility generated hazardous waste to the TDS facility, also
owned and operated by Safety Kleen.

Dry Cleaning Equipment Summary
Machine
Number
Type of
Machine
Manufacturer Model # Serial # Date (year) of
manufacture
Date (year)
Of Installation
Solvent
used
Observed
Operating ?
1 Dry to dry RealStar

RS-260 ? perc No
2 Dry to dry Aero-Tech
USA
410 ? Perc No

(III) INSPECTION SUMMARY: On March 13, 2007, Eric Swope, Compliance Coordinator and Alicia Roh,
Compliance Inspector, with the North Carolina Division of Waste Management, Dry Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act
(DSCA) Program conducted an outreach training visit at Peoples Cleaners. The inspectors met with Mr. Quillie Smith, store
owner, who provided the inspectors access to the facility’s equipment and available records.

The following is a summary of Peoples Cleaner’s compliance with respect to the DSCA Required Minimum Management
Practices provided in 15A NCAC 02S.0202, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) referenced in 40
CFR part 261.5 and 262. It was strongly recommended that Mr. Smith contact Mecklenburg County Air Quality in order to
determine Peoples Cleaner’s compliance with the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)
found in 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart M requirements.

During a discussion with Mr. Smith regarding facility operations, Mr. Smith explained that a fire had occurred at his store
approximately 2 weeks prior. One of the dryers had caught fire during the night. Smoke and water damage were prevalent
on site in the vicinity of the dry cleaning machines, washers and dryers. Since the fire incident, Mr. Smith stated that he was
operating as a pickup location and another plant was performing the dry cleaning until he could get his plant back in
operation. Mr. Smith had also received a letter in the mail from the DSCA cleanup program regarding a discovery of
contamination on the property.

The Realstar RS-260 dry cleaning machine was operational but did not have secondary containment. Contact water from
the dry cleaning machine was collected in an uncovered container that was not stored within spill containment. A lid from a
waste drum was placed underneath the solvent pump to catch leaks/oil from the solvent pump.

The Aero-Tech USA 410 dry cleaning machine was not operational but did have secondary containment. Water had
accumulated in the spill containment underneath the Aerotech dry-cleaning machine, likely leftover from when the fire was
extinguished. The carbon filter housings of the Aerotech dry cleaning machine were removed. Perc sensitivity was detected
with the halogen leak detector in the vicinity of the open filter housings, and along the floor in front of the dry cleaning
machine where the vinyl tiles were removed.

It was brought to Mr. Quillie Smith’s attention that vacuum pump condensate and contact water produced by mopping near
the dry cleaning machines were to be treated as contact water. The vacuum pump exhausted to the interior of the plant and
the condensate was not collected and discharged to the floor. Mr. Smith was advised to begin collecting the vacuum pump
condensate in a waste container and transfer to either a hazardous waste drum or treat on site utilizing a wastewater
treatment unit (mister/evaporator). Wastewater treatment equipment was not used on site.

The designated hazardous waste storage area was located in the boiler room. The waste drums were not stored within spill
containment, were not labeled as hazardous waste, were not dated with the recommended accumulation start date, and were
not properly sealed. Filters were placed in open waste drums that were not properly labeled or sealed. Depleted dry
cleaning machine filters were also observed in a waste dumpster behind the facility. Mr. Smith was also reminded to
periodically empty the spotting table waste and dispose in a hazardous waste drum.

The Emergency Information Form (in case of a spill or other emergency) was provided to Mr. Quillie Smith, and he was
instructed to complete and post this form close to the telephone. Absorbent spill clean-up materials were not available on
site.

The following records were kept onsite and were available for review: machine operation manual. The following records
were not kept onsite and were not available for review: perc purchase receipts, perc 12-month running total, Leak Detection
and Repair log, receipts pertaining to equipment purchases, modifications and repairs, log of the condenser exit temperature,
Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for solvents and spotting agents, Hazardous Waste Inspection Log, monthly Waste
Generation Log, and manifests for waste pickup. Mr. Smith did not maintain the required recordkeeping in the 2007 DSCA
Calendar.

Machine maintenance concerns were noted during the outreach visit: Mr. Smith was not aware of where to read the
condenser exit temperature or the proper high/low pressure gauge settings/readings for the refrigeration system. Mr. Smith
was advised to contact his mechanic or the manufacturer of the dry cleaning machine regarding the refrigeration system
readings, and to maintain all required recordkeeping for the facility in the 2007 DSCA Compliance calendar.

(IV) CONCLUSIONS: Peoples Cleaners has received an outreach visit from the DSCA Compliance program in which
inspectors reviewed all of the applicable regulations that apply to the facility. An outreach corrective action letter, outlining
all of the needed improvements required to ensure environmental compliance was sent by certified mail to Mr. Quillie Smith,
owner of Peoples Cleaners, on March 19, 2007.

(V) RECOMMENDATIONS: Peoples Cleaners is required to respond to DSCA compliance by April 2, 2007 as to what
actions have been taken to address items 1-19 in the corrective action letter. If the response is received by DSCA by the
requested date no further action is required. It is recommended that a DSCA compliance inspection be conducted by March
2008. It was strongly recommended that Mr. Smith contact Mecklenburg County Air Quality in order to determine Peoples
Cleaner’s compliance with the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) found in 40 CFR Part
63 Subpart M requirements.

To: Mr. Quillie Smith, Owner
Peoples Cleaners
1930 Beatties Ford Road
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County
North Carolina 28216

From: Mr. Eric Swope, Compliance Coordinator
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR)
Division of Waste Management (DWM)
Dry-Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA) Program

Date: March 15, 2007

Please address the following issues at Peoples Cleaners, as discussed during our on-site meeting on March
13, 2007.

1) Install spill containment (secondary containment) underneath and around all dry-cleaning
machines, dry-cleaning solvent pumps and stills.
2) Install spill containment (secondary containment) under all hazardous waste storage areas.
3) All hazardous waste drums and containers containing waste (including contact water containers)
must be sealed (except when adding or removing wastes) and stored in spill containment.
4) Remove and properly dispose or treat the water that has collected in the spill containment
(secondary containment) underneath the Aerotech dry-cleaning machine.
5) All hazardous waste drums containing any waste solvent must be labeled “Hazardous Waste.”
6) Small Quantity Generators (SQG) are required to label hazardous waste drums with the
accumulation start date (the date waste was initially added to the drum). DSCA advises all
cleaners subject to the hazardous waste requirements to label waste drums with both the
accumulation start date and the end date (the date drum is sealed for waste pickup). Based on a
review of the EPA Envirofacts database, the EPA ID number assigned to your facility location
(at 2133 Beatties Ford Road) is NCD986188084.
7) All depleted dry cleaning machine filters must be properly disposed in hazardous waste drums.
This includes dry cleaning filters observed in a waste dumpster behind the facility.
8) Replace the back cover of the carbon filter housings of the Aerotech dry cleaning machine.
9) Complete the Emergency Information Form (in case of a spill or other emergency) and post this
form close to the telephone.
10) Absorbent spill clean-up materials must be available on site for use to clean up any spills. (Your
solvent supplier can advise you regarding the proper absorbent materials to use.)
11) Treat vacuum pump condensate as contact water. Discontinue releasing untreated vacuum pump
water (contact water) onto the floor. Begin collecting the vacuum pump condensate in a waste
container and transfer to either a hazardous waste drum or treat on site utilizing a wastewater
treatment unit (mister/evaporator).
12) Maintain on site receipts of manifests pertaining to waste pickup (please keep these organized
and in order from most recent to oldest). EPA regulations state these need to be on site for 3
years. It is recommended that you log the hazardous waste pickup manifests in the “Hazardous
Waste Manifest Log-for waste shipped off site” table at the back of the calendar.
13) Maintain on site receipts pertaining to equipment purchases, modifications and repairs.
14) Begin immediately keeping all required (highlighted red) monthly recordkeeping logs found in
the 2007 DSCA Compliance Calendar.
15) It is recommended that you contact your solvent supplier in order to obtain records pertaining to
your solvent purchases.
16) It is recommended that you ask the manufacturer or mechanic who services the dry cleaning
machine where to read the condenser exit temperature at the end of the drying cycle. If there is
not a refrigerated condenser exit temperature readout, it needs to be installed. It is required to
maintain condenser exit temperatures below 45 degrees Fahrenheit at the end of the
drying/cleaning cycle, to ensure efficient recovery of perchloroethylene vapors.
17) Make sure you have the Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for perchloroethylene, spotting
agents and all other solvents that are used at your facility and keep onsite (can be obtained from
your solvent supplier). It is recommended that you keep these in a binder.
18) Mop water may potentially contain perc and therefore would be considered contact water.
DSCA strongly recommends that such mop water be either drummed as hazardous waste or
treated by utilizing an onsite wastewater treatment unit (mister/evaporator).
19) Periodically empty the spotting table waste and dispose in a hazardous waste drum.

Note: Items 20-22 are only necessary if you choose to treat your contact water onsite with a waste
water treatment unit (mister or evaporator)

20) In the future, if you choose to utilize an on-site waste water treatment unit (mister/evaporator) to
treat your contact/separator water instead of drumming as hazardous waste, DSCA strongly
recommends the utilization of 2 carbon filters (to insure that the contact water containing perc
solvent is completely recovered and not released into the environment).
21) In the future, when or if you utilize an on-site waste water treatment unit, begin keeping the
“Onsite Waste Water Treatment Unit: (Evaporator/mister) Log” found in the 2007 DSCA
Compliance Calendar once you install and operate the new onsite waste treatment unit.
22) In the future, when or if you utilize an on-site waste water treatment unit, spill containment is
required under all on-site waste treatment units (mister or evaporators).

Please thoroughly review the 2007 DSCA Compliance Calendar and immediately begin keeping the
required records and documentation. Please also review the “Minimum Management Practice (MMPs)”
compliance requirements and the “Letter of Introduction” as it lists items that compliance inspectors will
need to review to determine environmental compliance at your dry cleaner facility.

The Mecklenburg County Air Quality program should be contacted regarding an explanation of
NESHAP requirements that apply to your facility and to determine your NESHAP compliance
status.

Please reply by email or submit a written response to the address below by April 2, 2007, as to the actions
you have taken to address the above items 1-19.

Division of Waste Management
DSCA Compliance Program – Attn: Eric Swope
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646

We appreciate your immediate attention to these concerns. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance
during the site visit on March 13, 2007.

Regards,

Eric Swope [e-mail] 919-508-8457
Alicia Roh [e-mail] 919-218-0015
Peoples Cleaners Outreach Visit
1930 Beatties Ford Road March 13, 2007
Charlotte NC 28216 ECS/ADR
[phone] Page 1 of 3

Picture 1: Peoples Dry Cleaners (Mecklenburg
County)

Picture 3: Dry to Dry Realstar RS-260
dry cleaning machine with no spill (secondary)
containment around and underneath.

Picture 2: Storefront

Picture 4: Back of dry cleaning machine
showing no spill containment. Separator
(contact) water is collecting in an uncovered
bucket and is not in spill containment.

Peoples Cleaners Outreach Visit
1930 Beatties Ford Road March 13, 2007
Charlotte NC 28216 ECS/ADR
[phone] Page 2 of 3
Picture 5: Dry to Dry Areotech USA 410 dry
cleaning machine with spill (secondary)
containment. (Not in service)

Picture 7: Spotting table??

Picture 6: Back of dry cleaning machine.
Water remaining in spill containment from the
fire??

Picture 8: Vacuum press, exhausting to the air,
and possibly draining onto the floor.

Peoples Cleaners Outreach Visit
1930 Beatties Ford Road March 13, 2007
Charlotte NC 28216 ECS/ADR
[phone] Page 3 of 3
Picture 10: Waste filters placed in waste
container; not sealed.
Picture 9: Hazardous waste storage drums an
empty solvent drums (?) in the boiler room.
Not adequately labeled.

Picture 12: Depleted filter observed in
dumpster located at the rear exterior of the
facility.
Picture 11: Open filter housing Aerotech
machine.

REFERENCE 15

REFERENCE 16
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
Dry Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA) Compliance Program
Inspection Report
Date: 1/11/2018

Facility Identification
Peoples Cleaners
Facility ID: 600017C
EPA Generator ID: NCD986188084
County/FIPS: Mecklenburg/119
DSCA Cleanup ID: DC600006
Facility Data
Peoples Cleaners
1930 Beatties Ford Road
Charlotte NC 28216
Lat: 35.261722 Long: -80.854583
SIC: 7216 / Dry Cleaning Plants, Except Rugs
NAICS: 81232/ Dry Cleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated)
Date of Facility Establishment: 1990
Compliance Data
Inspection Date: 1/11/2018
Time In: 08:30 AM Time Out: 09:00 AM
Inspectors: Aram Kim, Neshonda Cobbs
Operating Status: OO/Operating
Compliance Codes: In Violation of MMP
Action Code: 01/Inspection
Contact Data Classification Data
Service Type: Pickup (Full Service Inactive)
Solvent: Perchloroethylene
System: Dry-to-Dry
Installation Date:
Installation Category: New
Consumption Category: Small
HW Generator Status: CESQG
Facility Contact
Quillie Smith
1930 Beatties Ford Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28269
[phone]
Facility Owner
Quillie Smith
1930 Beatties Ford Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28269
[phone]
Property Owner
Quillie Smith
1930 Beatties Ford Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28269
[phone]
Inspector’s Signature:

Date of Signature: 1/11/18

Comments:
NOV/NRE will be issued for repeated violations.

(I) DIRECTIONS: From the Mooresville Regional Office at 610 East Center Avenue in Mooresville, go west on East
Center Avenue. Turn left onto S. Main St. (NC-152). Turn right onto W. McClelland Ave. (NC-152). Turn left onto NC-
150. Merge onto I-77 South. Merge onto I-85 S via Exit 13B toward Spartanburg and take the Beatties Ford Rd. exit- (Exit
37). Turn right onto Beatties Ford Rd and the dry cleaning facility is located on the left at 1930 Beatties Ford Road.

(II) FACILITY HISTORY: Peoples Cleaners has been operated by Mr. Quillie Smith, since approximately 1990. Peoples
Cleaners was previously a bakery and fish market (1985-1990), and a filling station from the 1950’s to around 1985.
PCE/TCE contamination has been discovered on this property, and the site (60-0006) has been deferred to the Inactive
Hazardous Sites Branch. Mr. Smith explained that a fire had occurred at his store in March 2007. In 2012 thedry cleaning
operation became inactive and continued to function as a pick-up store. The Garments that require dry cleaning are taken
to Bennett's Ultra Cleaners.

Solvent History:
Solvent Dates Used
Perchloroethylene 1990 to Present

Previous Inspections:
Date Visit Type Violation
Type(s)
Worst Violation(s) Action(s)
Taken
Response
Due
Received
Date
Inspector
3/10/2016 Inspection MMP No spill containment
under four 15-gallon
drums.
NOV sent
on
3/17/2016
4/8/2016 N/A or
Not Rec'd
Jack
Kitchen
CHKLST
sent on
3/10/2016
None
3/5/2015 Inspection MMP No spill containment CHKLST
sent on
3/6/2015
3/27/2015 N/A or
Not Rec'd
Jack
Kitchen
8/22/2008 Inspection MMP Release, no spill pan
for DC machine,
recordkeeping
NOVNRE
sent on
9/10/2008
9/24/2008 9/23/2008 Alicia
Roh
3/13/2007 Outreach
Training
Visit
MMP Release, no spill pan
for DC machine,
recordkeeping
CAL sent
on
3/15/2007
4/2/2007 N/A or
Not Rec'd
Eric
Swope

Complaints: None

DSCA Sampling: None

(III) FACILITY CLASSIFICATION:

NESHAP INSTALLATION CATEGORY – New: Peoples Cleaners utilizes a 3rd Generation dry-to-dry dry cleaning
machine that was installed in 2007. Since the dry cleaning machine was installed after December 9, 1991, the dry
cleaning machine is classified as a 'New' machine installation.

Dry Cleaning Equipment Summary
No Type of
Machine
Gen Manufacturer
(Mfr)
Model # Serial # Mfr
Date
Install
Date
End
Date
Solvent Used Observed
Operating?
1 Dry-to-
Dry
3rd RealStar RS-260 60-B2-
171
-- -- 2012 Perchloroethylene Removed
2 Dry-to-
Dry
3rd Aero-Tech
USA
410 -- -- 2007 N/A Perchloroethylene No

NESHAP SOURCE CATEGORY - SMALL: Peoples Cleaners is classified as a Small Area Source because it
purchased less than 140 gallons of perc during the previous 12-month period. Based on a review of the receipts for the
past year, Peoples Cleaners did not purchase any perc in the last 12 months.

HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR CATEGORY - CESQG: Peoples Cleaners is classified as a Conditionally
Exempt Small Quantity Generator (CESQG) because the facility has routinely generated less than 220 pounds of waste
per month during the past 12 months, and stores less than 2,200 pounds of hazardous waste on site. XXXX full 15-
gallon drums of hazardous waste were observed on site at the time of the inspection (approx. 250 lbs). The facility
utilizes an onsite wastewater treatment unit (WWTU) to dispose of facility-generated contact water.

(IV) INSPECTION SUMMARY: On January 11, 2018, Aram Kim and Neshonda Cobbs, Compliance Inspectors, with
the North Carolina Division of Waste Management, Dry Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA) Program conducted a
Compliance Inspection at Peoples Cleaners. The inspectors met with Mr. Quillie Smith, store owner, who provided the
inspector access to the facility's equipment and available records.

The Realstar RS-260 3rd generation dry cleaning machine was removed from the facility in 2012. The Aero-Tech USA dry-
to-dry 3rd generation dry cleaning machine (picture 1) is remained on site. Even though the machine is still connected to
power, the solvent tanks appeared to be empty of perc and the machine has not been in operation since 2012. The facility
continues to be operated as a pickup store only. All garments are sent to Bennett Ultra Cleaners to be cleaned. The facility
boiler remains nonfunctional at the time of the inspection.

Multiple 15-gallon waste drums were observed inside the boiler room at the rear of the facility (picture 2). Three 15-gallon
hazardous perc waste drums appeared to contain liquid waste or waste filters from the perc dry cleaning machines. It was
difficult to check how full each drum was due to the limited light and access space in the boiler room. Two waste drums
which could be storing waste were not stored within spill containment and three drums were stored within inadequate spill
containment. The inspectors explained to the owner that the drums containing waste should be either removed by the
licensed waste hauler or stored within adequately sized spill containment for 15-gallon drums. The inspectors briefly
discussed the decommissioning process of the facility with the owner.

The inspectors provided contact information of several licensed waste haulers for Mr. Smith. The dry cleaning machine has
not been in use for at least 5 years and no dry cleaning waste had been removed from the facility in the past three years.
Logbooks for leak inspections, repairs, and monitoring have not been kept or required. Perc had not been purchased since
2012.

Emergency information form was completed and posted on site. Emergency spill cleanup material was stored on site.

The following is a summary of Peoples Cleaners' compliance with respect to the DSCA Required Minimum Management
Practices provided in 15A NCAC 02S.0202 and Recovery Act (RCRA) referenced in 40 CFR part 261.5 and 262. It was
strongly recommended that Mr. Quillie Smith contact Mecklenburg County Air Quality with questions regarding Peoples
Cleaners' compliance with the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) found in 40 CFR Part
63 Subpart M requirements.

MMP VIOLATIONS - 15A NCAC 02S.0202

1. Spill containment was not installed under and around the waste solvent storage containers.

2. The spill containment being utilized has a volumetric capacity less than 110 percent of the largest container that
it is storing.

NESHAP VIOLATIONS - 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart M
NOTE: The Mecklenburg County Air Quality Program retains the authority to determine the facility's NESHAP compliance
status.

None

RCRA VIOLATIONS - Hazardous Waste Regulations: 40 CFR Part 262.34
None

(V) CONCLUSIONS: Based on observations documented by the DSCA Inspectors during the January 11, 2018 inspection,
Peoples Cleaners is currently in violation of the following regulations:

MMPs - 15A NCAC 02S.0202
(b)(2) Failure to maintain spill containment under and around the waste solvent storage area by January 1,
2002 [15 NCAC 0202 (b)(2)]. Spill containment shall have a volumetric capacity of 110 percent of
the largest vessel, tank, or container within the spill containment area and shall be capable of
preventing the release of the applicable dry cleaning solvent beyond the spill containment area for a
period of at least 72 hours.
(b)(2) Failure to install spill containment with a volumetric capacity of 110 percent of the largest vessel,
tank, or container within the spill containment area and capable of preventing the release of the
applicable dry cleaning solvent beyond the spill containment area for a period of at least 72 hours. [15
NCAC 0202 (b)(2)].

NESHAP - 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart M
NOTE: The Mecklenburg County Air Quality Program retains the authority to determine the facility's NESHAP compliance
status.

None

RCRA- Hazardous Waste Regulations: 40 CFR Part 261 - 262
None

(VI) ENFORCEMENT HISTORY (Penalties): None

(VII) RECOMMENDATIONS: A DSCA Compliance Program Checklist (#02532) was issued to Mr. Quillie Smith,
owner of Peoples Cleaners, indicating the compliance issues to be addressed. A Notice of Violation (NOV)/Notice of
Recommendation for Enforcement (NRE) will be issued to Mr. Quillie Smith for the violations observed during the
inspection. DSCA Supervisors will determine if enforcement and civil penalties are warranted after reviewing a written
response from Peoples Cleaners. A follow-up inspection should be conducted by January 11, 2019 to confirm compliance.

(VIII) PHOTOGRAPHS:
Picture 1: Aero-Tech USA 3rd generation dry-to-dry dry cleaning machine. Machine has not been in operation since 2012.
Machine is partially decommissioned, but still connected to electricity.

Picture 2: Several 15-gallon hazardous waste drums observed inside the boiler room. Three drums appeared to be partially
full of liquid and or filter waste. Spill containment was either not installed or not adequate.

REFERENCE 17

February 17, 2020

To: Mr. Quillie Smith
1930 Beatties Ford Road
Charlotte, NC 28216

Re: Notice of Dry-Cleaning Solvent Contamination
1930 Beatties Ford Road-People’s Cleaners DC600006
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina

Dear Mr. Smith:

The Division of Waste Management has received information indicating that dry-cleaning solvent
contamination was discovered during a site investigation at the above-referenced location. I have included a
copy of the site report. This contamination appears to be related to the dry-cleaning facility located on your
property. Unless further investigation proves that the contamination is from a source not originating from
your property, you as a property owner are considered a potentially responsible party (PRP) and liable for the
costs of any assessment and remediation.

As I explained, you do have a choice for deciding under which of the two state environmental over-site
programs the contamination on the property will be managed. An overview of each program below:

Dry-Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA) Program - Sites contaminated with dry-cleaning solvent may
be eligible for access to the DSCA Fund. This is the Program I discussed with you on the phone.

▪ The majority of the costs for assessment and remediation will be covered by the Fund minus a
deductible and co-pay. There is also a one-time $1,000 application fee to enter the DSCA Program.
▪ The DSCA Program will manage the cleanup of the site.
▪ The site's priority ranking will dictate when the site will be cleaned up to risk-based standards.

Inactive Hazardous Sites (IHS) Program - Property owners or business owners that decide not to
participate in the DSCA Program will be placed in the IHS Program by default.

▪ The PRP will cover all of the costs of assessment and remediation.
▪ The PRP will be responsible for contracting a registered environmental consultant.
DC600006 (People’s Cleaners)
1930 Beatties Ford Road
DSCA/IHS Choice Letter
Page 2
▪ Contaminated groundwater that has or will migrate off the property is not eligible for alternate risk-
based standards without the approval of off-property owners. There are fees associated with obtaining
risk-based alternate groundwater standards.

Please direct any questions or correspondence to:

Division of Waste Management
North Carolina Dry-Cleaning Solvent Act Program
Attn: DSCA Program/Jay W. King
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646

Or contact me directly at:

919.707.8367
[e-mail]

I appreciated the time you gave me to discuss the site and the benefits of the DSCA Program. I also
understand that any future financial obligation, for any reason, will be a serious issue for you. Therefore, if I
do not receive a reply from you within 60 days, the site will be placed on the IHS Program's site list.

Sincerely,
Jay W. King, DSCA Project Manager
Division of Waste Management, NCDEQ

cc: Delonda Alexander, DSCA Program
Charlotte Jesneck, IHS Program

REFERENCE 18

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT Dry Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA) Compliance Program Inspection Memo

Facility Identification
Peoples Cleaners Facility ID: 600017C EPA Generator ID: NCD986188084 County/FIPS: Mecklenburg/119 DSCA Cleanup ID: DC600006
Facility Data Peoples Cleaners 1930 Beatties Ford Road
Charlotte NC 28216 Lat: 35.261722 Long: -80.854583 SIC: 7216 / Dry Cleaning Plants, Except Rugs NAICS: 81232/ Dry Cleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) Date of Facility Establishment: 1990
Compliance Data Inspection Date: 6/8/2022 Time In: 11:00 AM Time Out: 11:10 AM Inspector: Ne’Shonda Cobbs Operating Status: OO/Operating Compliance Codes: In Compliance Action Code: 01/Inspection
Contact Data Classification Data Service Type: Pickup (Full Service Inactive) Solvent: Perchloroethylene System: Dry-to-Dry Installation Date: 2007 Installation Category: New Consumption Category: Small HW Generator Status: VSQG
Facility Contact
Quillie Smith 1930 Beatties Ford Rd. Charlotte, NC 28269 [phone]
Facility Owner
Quillie Smith 1930 Beatties Ford Rd. Charlotte, NC 28269 [phone]
Property Owner
Quillie Smith 1930 Beatties Ford Rd. Charlotte, NC 28269 [phone]
Inspector’s Signature:
Date of Signature: 6/8/22
Comments:
Facility has not operated dry-cleaning machine in over 10 years or cleaned any items. Owner just keeps building open.

(I) FACILITY HISTORY: Peoples Cleaners has been operated by Mr. Quillie Smith, since approximately 1990. Peoples Cleaners was previously a bakery and fish market (1985-1990), and a filling station from the 1950’s to around 1985. PCE/TCE contamination has been discovered on this property, and the site (60-0006) has been deferred to the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch. Mr. Smith explained that a fire had occurred at his store in March 2007. In 2012 the dry-cleaning operation became inactive and continued to function as a pick-up store. No garments have been processed at the facility or through pick up location in several years. Solvent History: Solvent Dates Used
Perchloroethylene 1990 to Present
Dry Cleaning Equipment Summary
No Type of Machine Gen Manufacturer (Mfr) Model # Serial # Mfr Date Install Date End Date Solvent Used Observed Operating?
1 Dry-to-Dry 3rd RealStar RS-260 60-B2-171 -- -- 1/1/2012 Perchloroethylene removed
2 Dry-to-Dry 3rd Aero-Tech USA 410 -- -- 1/1/2007 N/A Perchloroethylene no
(II) INSPECTION SUMMARY: On June 08, 2022, Ne’Shonda Cobbs, Compliance Inspector, with the North Carolina Division of Waste Management, Dry Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA) Program conducted a Compliance Inspection at Peoples Cleaners. The facility appears to still be open, however, no one was onsite at the time of the inspection. The owner is older and appears to have the facility open even though no business is being processed at the location. Previous inspections indicated that the machine had not been in use in many years. There is no power to the rear of the facility where the dry-cleaning equipment is located. Bennett’s Ultra Clean previously cleaned for the facility but according to the owner of Bennett’s, he has not cleaned for the facility in several years. A letter was sent in January 2020 to the facility in hopes that someone assisting the owner, would read it and reach back out to the program to provide additional details. No response
was ever provided. Another letter will be sent to the facility to try to illicit a response to whomever assists the owner. The owner is clearly not independent and has to have assistance to be present at the facility.

REFERENCE 19
From:King, Jay W
To:White, Jeffrey R
Subject:RE: Peoples Cleaners - 1930 Beatties Ford Rd
Date:Monday, January 9, 2023 1:16:46 PM
Attachments:Re Peoples Cleaners Charlotte.msg
image001.png
DC600006 _20200217_ChoiceLetter.pdf
DC600006_20070308_Correspondence.pdf
IH2287_20180921_Lab Results of creek below site.pdf
DC600006_19960304_PreDSCA_Ph2EnvAssessment.pdf
DC600006_20180924_SWS_Location.jpg
Good afternoon Jeffrey. I don’t believe we have met. I’m in Green Square.
This site has never been in the DSCA Program. This site has been referred back to IHSB twice now. I
talked with Quilly Smith after sending the attached choice letter 2020 about joining the DSCA
Program. Non-starter, he can’t afford the initial $1,000 app fee so there is no way he would have
been able to fulfill the financial obligations of our program. So back to IHSB jurisdiction. SW sample
info attached. Long way from the property, but nothing found. This property was seized at some
point by the US Customs Service, details unknown other than the city was giving Mr. Smith loans to
buy the property.
I couldn’t find my correspondence to Mike, but I do remember doing it. That’s all I got.

Jay W. King
DSCA Project Manager
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: [phone]
[e-mail]

From: White, Jeffrey R <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2023 12:22 PM
To: King, Jay W <[e-mail]>
Subject: Peoples Cleaners - 1930 Beatties Ford Rd

Good Afternoon Mr. King,

I am conducting a Pre-CERCLA Screening for the Peoples Cleaners Site, NONCD0002287 that will
include some passive soil gas sampling.

I found a correspondence dated 8/24/18 with you and a Mr. Mike Rogers regarding the property
owner and some surface water sampling.

Do you have any further information regarding the surface water sample/assessment and response
from the owner, Quilly Smith regarding the DSCA program? Was he cooperative?

Any help/information would be appreciated. Thanks!

Jeffrey R. White
Hydrogeologist, Superfund Section
Division of Waste Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: [phone] | Cell: [phone]
[e-mail]

From:King, Jay W
To:Rogers, Mike
Subject:RE: People"s Cleaners 1930 Beatties Ford Rd
Date:Friday, August 24, 2018 2:13:02 PM
Attachments:image004.jpg
image001.jpg
Thanks for the correct info about the site. I’ll just ask him what interest Lovine and assoc. has in the
property since they are listed as well. Maybe they are just a property manager since it says c/o.

2018_JWK_SIG

From: Rogers, Mike
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 2:01 PM
To: King, Jay W <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: People's Cleaners 1930 Beatties Ford Rd

We don’t have the lab samples back yet. Evidently, there was some sort of drug bust or illegal
activity at the site and the US Marshall’s office took the property and Quilly Smith worked at first
with them and then with the IRS to obtain the property. During our site visit there, I talked with
Quilly and he affirmed there had been a drug bust there. According to the Mecklenburg GIS site,
Quilly Smith is the current owner of the property.

From: King, Jay W
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 1:14 PM
To: Rogers, Mike <[e-mail]>
Subject: People's Cleaners 1930 Beatties Ford Rd

Good Afternoon Mike. I’m sure Colin told you I would be calling about subject property. I plan to give
Quilly Smith a call about the DSCA Program. Looks like there is evidence enough from the Cooper
Environmental report for the site to be an eligible petitioner. I’m still trying to figure out who
actually owns the property? Him or Sol Levin and Associates? GIS lists them both. Maybe something
to that since I had heard thru another party that the city may have taken the property several years
ago but gave it back through a free money program called “city within a city”. So I have to figure out
if the financial obligations can be met to qualify for DSCA.

Did you get the surface water sample results back yet? Colin told me you guys collected one to the
SE of the cleaner?

REFERENCE 20
From:Fortney, Caroline
To:White, Jeffrey R
Cc:Alexander, Pamela; Miller, Matt; Fortney, Caroline
Subject:[External] RE: Property Access Letter - 2015 Custer St.
Date:Tuesday, February 28, 2023 9:10:16 AM
Attachments:image001.pngimage002.png
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spam.
Thanks for clarifying that. Let us know if you need anything else from us.

Best,

Caroline Fortney
Portfolio Manager
City of Charlotte|General Services
600 East 4th Street, 12th floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
[phone] | [e-mail]

From: White, Jeffrey R <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 8:32 AM
To: Fortney, Caroline <[e-mail]>
Cc: Alexander, Pamela <[e-mail]>; Miller, Matt
<[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXT]RE: [EXT]RE: [External] Property Access Letter - 2015 Custer St.

Caroline,

We do not need access to the property owned by the City of Charlotte anymore since PSG sampling
was completed via the Phase II (which I appreciate you sending).

The sent proposed sampling plan was preliminary and dependent upon final access authorization
from property owners.

I apologize for not clarifying yesterday that we would not be accessing or installing on the City’s
property or any of the others that we did not have signed access agreements for.

Jeffrey R. White
Hydrogeologist, Superfund Section
Division of Waste Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: [phone] | Cell: [phone]
[e-mail]

From: Fortney, Caroline <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2023 8:57 AM
To: White, Jeffrey R <[e-mail]>
Cc: Alexander, Pamela <[e-mail]>; Miller, Matt
<[e-mail]>; Fortney, Caroline <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [EXT]RE: [External] Property Access Letter - 2015 Custer St.

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spam.

Good Morning, Jeffrey,

Although we are not opposed to sampling taking place on the property, the City (to my knowledge)
has not signed the appropriate paperwork to provide access to the site. Let’s make sure to have the
paperwork in place before crews go onto the City’s property.

Do you think you still need to do sampling, even with the Phase II report?

Assuming you do, I’ll work on getting the access request through the proper channels on my end.

Caroline Fortney
Portfolio Manager
City of Charlotte|General Services
600 East 4th Street, 12th floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
[phone] | [e-mail]

From: White, Jeffrey R <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2023 8:51 AM
To: Fortney, Caroline <[e-mail]>
Cc: Alexander, Pamela <[e-mail]>; Miller, Matt
<[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXT]RE: [External] Property Access Letter - 2015 Custer St.

Hi Caroline,

Thank you for getting back to me and providing the Phase II report.

We will be mobilizing to the site at 1000 and should arrive ~1230-1300.

Please feel free to call my cell phone anytime this afternoon while we are in the field to install the
other PSG samplers if you feel it may relate or alter our original proposed sampling plan.

Otherwise, I am also free for the 0900 – 1300 slot tomorrow.

Jeffrey R. White
Hydrogeologist, Superfund Section
Division of Waste Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: [phone] | Cell: [phone]
[e-mail]

From: Fortney, Caroline <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2023 4:41 PM
To: White, Jeffrey R <[e-mail]>
Cc: Alexander, Pamela <[e-mail]>; Miller, Matt
<[e-mail]>; Fortney, Caroline <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Property Access Letter - 2015 Custer St.

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spam.

Jeffrey,

I am following up on your request attached and below. The City recently completed a Phase I and
Phase II assessment for this site. We would like to share the Phase II with you and setup a time to
touch base about the request early next week. Are you available for 30 mins in any of the time
windows below?

Monday 11:30am - 1:00pm
Monday 1:30am - 5:00pm
Tuesday 9:00am-9:30am
Tuesday 4:00pm-5:00pm

Caroline Fortney
Portfolio Manager
City of Charlotte|General Services
600 East 4th Street, 12th floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
[phone] | [e-mail]

From: Wells, Ebony <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 11:57 AM
To: Loy, Anne-Rose <[e-mail]>; Radcliff, Anna
<[e-mail]>; Sossamon, Leisa <[e-mail]>
Cc: Fortney, Caroline <[e-mail]>
Subject: Fwd: [EXT]Property Access Letter - 2015 Custer St.

Good afternoon,
Please see email below regarding property access to a city owned property for an environmental
assessment/sampling.

Begin forwarded message:
From: "White, Jeffrey R" <[e-mail]>
Date: February 21, 2023 at 11:48:40 AM EST
To: "Wells, Ebony" <[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXT]Property Access Letter - 2015 Custer St.

Ms. Wells,

Please see the attachments for the property access form and letter with a brief
explanation of the purpose and extent of our environmental assessment/sampling.

I’ve also included a preliminary proposed sampling location map dependent upon how
many properties respond/grant access.

Thank you so much for your help and please do not hesitate to call/email me with any
questions.

Jeffrey R. White
Hydrogeologist, Superfund Section
Division of Waste Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: [phone] | Cell: [phone]
[e-mail]

REFERENCE 21

Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc.
2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28208
Licensures: NC Engineering F-1253, Geology C-2478
T: 704-357-8600
www.woodplc.com
‘Wood’ is a trading name for John Wood Group PLC and its subsidiaries
July 23, 2021

Ms. Pamela Alexander, MFFI
Risk Management/Compliance Officer
City of Charlotte
Housing & Neighborhood Services (HNS)
600 East Trade Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202

Subject: Report of Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Proposed Phoenix Rising Subdivision
Custer Street and LaSalle Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28215
Wood Project: 6228-20-6016.01.36

Dear Ms. Alexander:
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. (Wood) is pleased to submit this Report of Phase II
Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the above-referenced site located in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Included in this report is an outline of our understanding of the project information, a description of the
assessment activities, a discussion of the laboratory results, and our conclusions. This assessment was
completed in general accordance with our proposal Prop21CARO.188, dated June 7, 2021.
Project Information
The site located at Custer Street and LaSalle Street, Charlotte, North Carolina (Figure 1), is comprised of
seven land parcels totaling approximately 2.45 acres of undeveloped former residential lots and
undeveloped woodland areas. Wood recently completed a Phase I ESA at the site and identified the
following adjoining property that has a potential to create a recognized environmental condition (REC) in
connection with the site:
 The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) issued a Notice of Violation
(NOV) on July 29, 1996 for the People’s Cleaners (1930 Beatties Ford Road) facility based on
documented chlorinated solvent contamination from both tetrachlorethylene (PCE) and
trichloroethene (TCE) found in the underlying groundwater. A Phase II Environmental Assessment
report (dated March 4, 1996) also indicated the presence of accumulated liquid near floor drains
and an empty drum that once contained PCE. On January 6, 2020, a Senior Environmental Specialist
with the NCDEQ-DSCA Program visited the facility and observed a 15-gallon waste drum containing
Phoenix Rising – Report of Phase II ESA
Charlotte, North Carolina
July 23, 2021

2

PCE stored in the boiler room of the facility. The spill containment container used for the waste
drum was noted to not be large enough to hold the required 110% of the drum’s maximum
capacity. Another 15-gallon drum of unknown liquid was observed being stored on a pallet in the
boiler room of the facility. In addition to the drycleaner, this property was reportedly occupied by a
gasoline station (Younges Service Station) from at least 1959 to 1984, and as Peoples Cleaners from
at least 1989 to the present. Based on distance from the site, historical usage as a service station and
drycleaner and documented groundwater impacts at the neighboring property, Wood considers the
People’s Cleaners facility to have the potential to create a REC in connection with the site.
 Surrounding properties to the west included a service station at 2012 Beatties Ford Road from at
least 1974 to 1994. Based on distance from the site and historical usage as a service station at the
adjoining facility located at 2012 Beatties Ford Road (currently Ford’s Used Tires), Wood considers
this facility to have the potential to create a REC in connection with the site.

City of Charlotte Housing & Neighborhood Services requested Wood perform a Phase II ESA to assess the
site for potential impacts related to the identified RECs. The Phase II ESA activities are described in the
sections below.
Assessment Activities
Prior to conducting the sub-surface assessment activities, Wood contacted the North Carolina underground
utility location service (811) and a private underground utility locator to mark buried objects such as pipes,
tanks, or underground utility lines. The purpose of this effort is to minimize the potential for probing into
underground utilities, tanks or lines buried at the subject property.
Soil-Gas Sampling and Analyses
On July 6, 2021, Wood personnel and probing subcontractor licensed in the State of North Carolina,
Innovative Environmental Technologies (IET), mobilized to the site to advance four soil borings for the
installation of four temporary soil-gas sampling points (SG-1 to SG-4). The locations of the temporary
soil-gas sampling points are shown on Figure 2. The soil-gas sampling was performed in general
accordance with the NCDEQ Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Guidance, (dated
March 2018).
The IET probing crew advanced the four soil borings using an AMS PowerProbe 9500-VTR direct-push
probe rig. A soil sampler was driven into the soil to remove soil cores from the subsurface. To minimize
the potential for cross-contamination between sample locations, a new PVC sleeve (tube) was inserted
into the sampler for each soil boring. The borings were advanced to an approximate total depth of five
feet below ground surface (bgs). Dedicated soil-gas sampling points were placed into each borehole and
connected to disposable tubing extending to the ground surface. A sand pack of approximately 8 to 10
inches thick was placed around the sampling points. The remaining annulus of the boreholes were filled
with hydrated bentonite to ground surface. The tubing was then connected to a PVC tee with PVC ball
Phoenix Rising – Report of Phase II ESA
Charlotte, North Carolina
July 23, 2021

3

valves on either side. One side of the tee was connected to a laboratory-provided, dedicated flow
controller with an in-line vacuum gauge leading to a 1-liter Summa canister. The other side of the tee was
connected to a peristaltic pump for sample train purging. Prior to sample collection, each sample train
was purged of stagnant air and a leak-check was performed. The Summa canisters and sample train were
surrounded by a helium-shroud for leak-check detection. The helium-shroud consisted of a plastic
sheeting placed over the Summa canister and sample tubing, then filled with helium. Wood personnel
collected the leak-check sample from the sample point by purging sub-slab soil gas into a Tedlar® bag.
The purging flow rate was measured using a Sensidyne Go-Cal Air Flow meter and was conducted at an
approximate flow rate of 200 milliliters per minute (mL/min). The leak-check sample was screened in the
field for helium using an MGD-2002 Multi-Gas leak (di-electric) detector. Wood personnel also used the
helium detector to monitor the concentration of helium inside the shroud. A leak was considered to occur
when the helium concentration inside the Tedlar® bag was greater than 10% of the helium concentration
within the shroud.
Following the leak-check, a soil-gas sample was collected into the Summa canister at an approximate flow
rate of 200 mL/min. Following collection of the soil-gas samples, the Summa canisters were delivered
under chain-of-custody protocol to Pace Analytical Services, LLC (Pace), an American Industrial Hygiene
Association (AIHA) – Laboratory Accreditation Programs (LAP) certified laboratory. The soil-gas samples
were analyzed by Pace for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) via EPA Method TO-15. Following
collection of the soil-gas samples, the soil-gas sampling points were removed, to the extent possible, and
the boreholes were backfilled with bentonite to the ground surface. Soil cuttings generated during the
installation of the soil-gas sampling points were spread onsite. Soil-gas sampling field worksheet are
included as Attachment A.
Groundwater Sampling and Analyses
Following the completion of the soil borings for the soil-gas sampling points, on July 6, 2021, the IET
probing crew off-set to the side of each boring by about 3 to 4 feet and advanced a second boring for the
installation of temporary groundwater monitoring wells. The locations of the four temporary monitoring
wells (TW-1 to TW-4) are shown on Figure 2. IET advanced the soil borings for the temporary well
installation using the same methods to install the soil-gas sampling points as described above. The soil
borings were advanced to an approximate depth of 15 feet bgs, except for TW-4 which was advanced to
an approximate depth of 25 feet bgs due to lack of apparent moisture in the silt. Visual and olfactory
observations relative to the soil cores were recorded by our field personnel. The soil types encountered in
each of the temporary monitoring well borings were recorded to prepare soil boring field worksheets
(Attachment B).
Phoenix Rising – Report of Phase II ESA
Charlotte, North Carolina
July 23, 2021

4

The IET probing crew installed a temporary groundwater monitoring well consisting of a one-inch
diameter PVC well screen (10-foot length) and riser in each of the four borings. A filter sand pack was
placed around each well screen to approximately two feet above the screened interval. A bentonite seal
was placed above the sand pack. Following installation, Wood personnel developed monitoring wells
TW-1, TW-2, and TW-4 with a peristaltic pump until the purged water is visibly clear. TW-3 was not
developed with a peristaltic pump due to the minimal saturated section observed during the installation
of TW-3. The temporary wells were left to stabilize overnight prior to groundwater sampling. The
temporary monitoring wells’ construction and abandonment driller records are included as Attachment
C.
On July 6, 2021, Wood personnel collected groundwater samples from the four temporary wells. Prior to
sample collection, the well caps for each of the temporary groundwater monitoring wells were removed,
and the water level was allowed to stabilize to ambient atmospheric pressure. The water level was
measured in each well with an electronic water level probe to determine depth to the water surface from
the top of the PVC riser pipe. The depth to groundwater ranged from 5.48 feet in temporary well TW-2 to
14.91 feet in well TW-4.
Following the measurement of the depth to water in each well, temporary monitoring wells TW-1, TW-2,
TW-3, and TW-4 were sampled using a peristaltic pump and dedicated tubing. The groundwater samples
were collected using low flow purging techniques, to the extent possible, in general accordance with EPA
Region IV SESD Field Branches Quality System and Technical Procedures guidance. During purging,
groundwater field parameters were collected using a YSI ProPlus water quality meter with a commercially
manufactured flow cell and an HFS MicroTPI turbidity meter. Groundwater field parameters collected
through the flow cell included pH, specific conductivity, dissolved oxygen, temperature, and oxidation
reduction potential. In well TW-3, with the least saturated section, the water level was unstable during
purging. Therefore, sample collection occurred soon after purging commenced so that there would be
water to sample.
Following completion of purging, groundwater samples were collected from each well into laboratory-
provided containers, placed in a cooler on ice, and delivered to Pace, a North Carolina certified laboratory,
under chain-of-custody protocol. The groundwater samples were analyzed by Pace for VOCs via EPA
Method 8260. Soil cuttings and purge water generated during the groundwater sampling activities were
spread on site. Following sample collection, the PVC casings for the temporary monitoring wells were
removed and the boreholes were backfilled using bentonite to the ground surface. Groundwater sampling
field worksheets are included as Attachment D.

Phoenix Rising – Report of Phase II ESA
Charlotte, North Carolina
July 23, 2021

5

Analytical Results
The results of the soil-gas laboratory analysis are shown on Table 1. The laboratory analytical reports and
chain-of-custody forms are included as Attachment E. A summary of the findings is as follows:
Soil-Gas
 Benzene was detected in the soil-gas samples collected from soil-gas sampling points SG-1, SG-2,
SG-3, and SG-4 at concentrations of 43.4, 55.9, 48.3, and 44.6 µg/m3, respectively. The detected
concentrations of benzene exceeded the NCDEQ DWM Residential Sub-Slab and Exterior Soil-Gas
Screening Levels (SGSLs) of 12 µg/m3.
 Naphthalene was detected in the soil-gas samples collected from soil-gas sampling points SG-1,
SG-2, SG-3, and SG-4 at concentrations of 7.0, 7.5, 7.4, and 5.5 µg/m3, respectively. The detected
concentrations of naphthalene exceeded the NCDEQ DWM Residential SGSLs of 2.8 µg/m3.
 Detectable concentrations of acetone, 2-butanone, carbon disulfide, chloroethane, chloromethane,
dichlorodifluoromethane, 1,2-dichloropropane, ethanol, ethylbenzene, 4-ethyltoluene, n-heptane,
2-hexanone, 4-methyl-2-pentanone, 2-propanol, propylene, styrene, tetrachloroethene, toluene,
trichlorofluoromethane, 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene,
1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, vinyl chloride, m&p-xylene, and o-xylene were identified in soil-gas samples
collected from at least one soil-gas sampling point. None of these concentrations exceeded the
respective NCDEQ DWM Residential SGSLs. No other detectable VOC concentrations were identified
in the soil-gas samples collected during this assessment.
Groundwater
 Results from the VOC analysis of the four groundwater samples did not report constituents above
their respective laboratory reporting limits.
Risk Assessment
The NCDEQ Risk Calculator (June 2021 Version) was used to evaluate cumulative vapor intrusion risk for the
site using the highest soil-gas concentration of each detected constituent. This assessment was performed in
general accordance with the NCDEQ Risk Calculator User Guide dated February 2021, and the Risk
Calculator output is provided as Attachment F. The soil-gas to indoor air pathway was considered for a
resident receptor and the results show that neither the target carcinogenic risk (10-4) nor the target hazard
index (1.0) was exceeded.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Based on the results of this assessment, Wood offers the following conclusions and recommendations:

 Detectable concentrations of VOCs were not identified in the groundwater samples collected
during this assessment. Based on these results, it appears the groundwater impacts identified at
Phoenix Rising – Report of Phase II ESA
Charlotte, North Carolina
July 23, 2021

6

the adjoining People’s Cleaners facility (1930 Beatties Ford Road) or potential impacts from the
adjoining former service station at 2012 Beatties Ford Road have not impacted the site and
additional groundwater assessment activities are not recommended at this time.

 Concentrations of VOCs which exceeded their respective NCDEQ Residential SGSLs were
identified in the soil-gas samples collected during this assessment. The highest soil-gas
concentration of each detected constituent was evaluated using the NCDEQ Risk Calculator for
cumulative vapor intrusion risk and neither the carcinogenic risk or hazard index was exceeded.
The results indicate that the potential for contaminant vapor intrusion into the planned residential
buildings is low and further evaluation of vapor intrusion or vapor mitigation controls are not
warranted at this time.

Limitations
Wood does not guarantee the subject properties are free of contamination or hazardous waste material
due to unknown or latent conditions that may become evident in the future, either on the site or on
adjoining or nearby properties. In addition, site conditions might change over time. Should further
surface, subsurface, chemical, or other data become available after the date of issue of this report, the
findings, conclusions, and recommendations contained herein may have to be modified. Review by Wood
of such additional information would be conducted upon receipt of a written request from our client.
The findings contained herein are relevant to the dates of Wood’s July 2021 site activities and should not
be relied upon to represent conditions at later dates. If changes in the nature, usage, or layout of the
property or nearby properties are made, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report
may not be valid. If additional information becomes available, it should be provided to Wood so the
original conclusions and recommendations can be modified as necessary.
Closing
Wood appreciates the opportunity to provide our services to you. If you have questions, please contact
the undersigned at [phone] at your convenience.
Sincerely,
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc.

Morgan Snead Helen P. Corley, LG, BCES
Staff Scientist Principal Hydrogeologist

Enclosures

FIGURES

7
4
0
7
2
0
760
740
740
7 2 0
760
720
7 20
760740
740740 720Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, EsriJapan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, andthe GIS User Community
PREPARED BY:
DATE:
CHECKED BY:
DATE:
SITE TOPOPHOENIX RISING SUBDIVISIONLASALLE STREET AND CUSTER STREETCHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
Document Path: F:\AMEC_Projects\2020\6228-20-6016 HUD\Pheonix\MXD\TopoUSE1.mxdPROJECT NO:6228206016
LM
3/19/2021
MS
3/19/2021
FIGURE:1
0 500 1,000Feet
¯
§¨¦521
§¨¦277
§¨¦16
§¨¦74
§¨¦77
§¨¦85
Legend
Site Boundary
Contour (20ft)
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc.2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100Charlotte, NC 28208(704) 357-8600
Lasalle St Custer StG a r n e t te P lLegend
Site Boundary Parcel
PREPARED BY:
DATE:
CHECKED BY:
DATE:
SAMPLE LOCATIONSPHOENIX RISING SUBDIVISIONLASALLE STREET AND CUSTER STREETCHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
¯Document Path: F:\AMEC_Projects\2020\6228-20-6016 HUD\Pheonix\MXD\SampleLocations.mxdPROJECT NO:6228206016
LM
7/23/2021
MS
7/23/2021
FIGURE:1
0 100 20050Feet
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc.2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100Charlotte, NC 28208(704) 357-8600
!
!
!
!
Peoples Dry Cleaners/Former Younges Service Station (1930 Beatties Ford Road)
SG-1/TW-1 SG-2/TW-2
SG-3/TW-3
SG-4/TW-4
!Soil-Gas/Groundwater Sample Location

TABLE

Sample ID SG-1 SG-2 SG-3 SG-4
Sample Duration 6-minute 5-minute 5-minute 6-minute
Sample Collection Date 7/6/2021 7/6/2021 7/6/2021 7/6/2021
Shroud Helium Concentration (ppm)1,300 46,000 34,000 27,000
Leak Check Helium Concentration (ppm)25 0.0 20 0.0
Acteone 49.8 53.6 78.3 60.2 220,000
Benzene 43.4 55.9 48.3 44.6 12
2-Butanone 16.8 17.4 27.3 9.6 35,000
Carbon Disulfide 117 55.4 49.4 28.8 4,900
Chloroethane <1.0 <1.1 4.3 2.4 70,000
Chloromethane 3.2 1.8 21.9 11.0 630
Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.7 700
1,2-Dichloropropane 4.5 5.5 3.8 2.5 25
Ethanol 29.3 18.3 25.6 13.5 NE
Ethylbenzene 16.4 17.4 17.9 12.4 37
4-Ethyltoluene 8.6 6.9 8.3 5.2 NE
n-Heptane 14.8 10.4 15.9 16.3 2,800
n-Hexane 58.2 18.1 31.8 35.9 4,900
2-Hexanone 27.1 25.8 28.8 <8.1 210
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 101 82.2 82.4 42.9 21,000
Naphthalene 7.0 7.5 7.4 5.5 2.8
2-Propanol 7.6 <5.0 <5.0 <4.8 1,400
Propylene 88.4 37.6 626 1,100 21,000
Styrene 2.0 2.1 4.4 4.7 7,000
Tetrachloroethene 14.8 105 7.5 9.2 280
Toluene 1,510 4,360 1,580 1,930 35,000
Trichlorofluoromethane 6.0 9.2 7.8 3.4 NE
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <2.9 3.2 3.4 <3.0 35,000
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 28.2 21.6 28.4 17.8 420
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 7.8 6.3 7.4 5.1 420
Vinyl chloride <0.49 <0.53 2.7 3.6 5.6
m&p-Xylene 51.8 44.3 54.9 35.5 700
o-Xylene 22.0 18.6 23.0 15.3 700
Notes:Prepared By/Date: MAS 7/19/21
1. Concentrations shown in micrograms per meter cubed (µg/m3)Checked By/Date: RPD 7/20/21
2. NCDEQ Residential SGSLs = Division of Waste Management Residential Sub-Slab and Exterior Soil-Gas Screening Levels, dated June 2021
3. TCR = Target Cancer Risk
4. THQ = Target Hazard Quotient
5. Values shown with "<" were not detected above the referenced laboratory reporting limit (RL)
6. Bolded and shaded values exceed the NCDEQ Residential SGSLs
6. NE = Standard not established
7. ppm = parts per million
NCDEQ Residential SGSL
(TCR = 1.0E-06; THQ=0.2)
(µg/m3)
Table 1 - Summary of Soil-Gas Analytical Results
Phoenix Rising Subdivision
Charlotte, North Carolina
Wood Project Number 6228-20-6016.01.36

ATTACHMENT A
SOIL-GAS SAMPLING FIELD WORKSHEETS

ATTACHMENT B
SOIL BORING FIELD WORKSHEETS

Red, Brown, Brown Clayey SILT
Tan, Gold Sandy SILT, black mottling
Tan, Gold, Sandy SILT. Wet
Boring Terminated at 15 Ft with 10 Ft screen (5-15 ft)Sand 3-15 FtBentonite 0-3 Ft
DEPTH
(ft)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATIONOF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT THE EXPLORATIONLOCATION. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHERLOCATIONS AND AT OTHER TIMES MAY DIFFER.INTERFACES BETWEEN STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE.TRANSITIONS BETWEEN STRATA MAY BE GRADUAL.
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NO.: TW-1
SOIL BORING LOG
SAMPLES
TYPE
FINES (%)
SPT N-Value (bpf)
Moist (%)LEGEND
Charlotte HNS
July 6, 2021
6228-20-6016
AMS POWER PROB 950VTR
6 Inches
ELEV
(ft)
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
IDENT
SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OFSYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW.
SOIL CLASSIFICATIONAND REMARKS
PL (%)
STANDARDPENETRATIONTEST(blows per6" increment)
LL (%)
PROJECT:
NORTHING:
EASTING:
DRILLED:
PROJ NUM:
DRILLER:
EQUIPMENT:
METHOD:
HOLE DIA.:
REMARKS:
LOGGED BY:
PREPARED BY:
CHECKED BY:
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40OLD LOGS.GPJ 7/21/21
Tan, Brown, Clayey SILT
Tan Brown, Sandy SILT
Tan Brown, Sandy SILT, Wet
Boring Terminated at 15 Ft with 10 Ft Screen (5-15 ft) Sand 3-15 FtBent 0-3 Ft
DEPTH
(ft)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATIONOF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT THE EXPLORATIONLOCATION. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHERLOCATIONS AND AT OTHER TIMES MAY DIFFER.INTERFACES BETWEEN STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE.TRANSITIONS BETWEEN STRATA MAY BE GRADUAL.
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NO.: TW-2
SOIL BORING LOG
SAMPLES
TYPE
FINES (%)
SPT N-Value (bpf)
Moist (%)LEGEND
Charlotte HNS
July 6, 2021
6228-20-6016
AMS POWER PROB 950VTR
6 Inches
ELEV
(ft)
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
IDENT
SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OFSYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW.
SOIL CLASSIFICATIONAND REMARKS
PL (%)
STANDARDPENETRATIONTEST(blows per6" increment)
LL (%)
PROJECT:
NORTHING:
EASTING:
DRILLED:
PROJ NUM:
DRILLER:
EQUIPMENT:
METHOD:
HOLE DIA.:
REMARKS:
LOGGED BY:
PREPARED BY:
CHECKED BY:
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40OLD LOGS.GPJ 7/21/21
ASPHALT/GRAVEL
Red, Brown, Clayey SILT
Brown, Tan, Sandy SILT
Brown, Tan, Sandy SILT, Wet
Boring Terminated at 15 Ft with 10 Ft Screen (5-10 ft) Sand 3-15 FtBent 0-3 Ft
DEPTH
(ft)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATIONOF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT THE EXPLORATIONLOCATION. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHERLOCATIONS AND AT OTHER TIMES MAY DIFFER.INTERFACES BETWEEN STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE.TRANSITIONS BETWEEN STRATA MAY BE GRADUAL.
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NO.: TW-3
SOIL BORING LOG
SAMPLES
TYPE
FINES (%)
SPT N-Value (bpf)
Moist (%)LEGEND
Charlotte HNS
July 6, 2021
6228-20-6016
AMS POWER PROB 950VTR
6 Inches
ELEV
(ft)
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
IDENT
SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OFSYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW.
SOIL CLASSIFICATIONAND REMARKS
PL (%)
STANDARDPENETRATIONTEST(blows per6" increment)
LL (%)
PROJECT:
NORTHING:
EASTING:
DRILLED:
PROJ NUM:
DRILLER:
EQUIPMENT:
METHOD:
HOLE DIA.:
REMARKS:
LOGGED BY:
PREPARED BY:
CHECKED BY:
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40OLD LOGS.GPJ 7/21/21
Tan, Orange, Clayey SILT
Tan, Brown, Clayey SILT
Brown Clayey SILT
Tan, Orange Clayey SILT
Tan, Orange Clayey SILT
Boring Terminated at 25 Ft with 10 Ft Screen (15-25 ft) Sand 13-25 FtBent 0-13 Ft
DEPTH
(ft)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
THIS RECORD IS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATIONOF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT THE EXPLORATIONLOCATION. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHERLOCATIONS AND AT OTHER TIMES MAY DIFFER.INTERFACES BETWEEN STRATA ARE APPROXIMATE.TRANSITIONS BETWEEN STRATA MAY BE GRADUAL.
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NO.: TW-4
SOIL BORING LOG
SAMPLES
TYPE
FINES (%)
SPT N-Value (bpf)
Moist (%)LEGEND
Charlotte HNS
July 6, 2021
6228-20-6016
AMS POWER PROB 950VTR
6 Inches
ELEV
(ft)
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
IDENT
SEE KEY SYMBOL SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OFSYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BELOW.
SOIL CLASSIFICATIONAND REMARKS
PL (%)
STANDARDPENETRATIONTEST(blows per6" increment)
LL (%)
PROJECT:
NORTHING:
EASTING:
DRILLED:
PROJ NUM:
DRILLER:
EQUIPMENT:
METHOD:
HOLE DIA.:
REMARKS:
LOGGED BY:
PREPARED BY:
CHECKED BY:
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40OLD LOGS.GPJ 7/21/21

ATTACHMENT C
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION AND ABANDONMENT RECORDS

WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD (GW-1) For Internal Use Only:
Form GW-1 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources Revised 2-22-2016
1. Well Contractor Information:
Well Contractor Name
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #:
List all applicable well construction permits (i.e. UIC, County, State, Variance, etc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
Agricultural Municipal/Public
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply) Residential Water Supply (single)
Industrial/Commercial Residential Water Supply (shared)
Irrigation
Non-Water Supply Well:
Monitoring Recovery
Injection Well:
Aquifer Recharge Groundwater Remediation
Aquifer Storage and Recovery Salinity Barrier
Aquifer Test Stormwater Drainage
Experimental Technology Subsidence Control
Geothermal (Closed Loop) Tracer
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Return) Other (explain under #21 Remarks)
4. Date Well(s) Completed: Well ID#
5a. Well Location:

Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)

Physical Address, City, and Zip

County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
N W
6. Is(are) the well(s): Permanent or Temporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: Yes or No
If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the
repair under #21 remarks section or on the back of this form.
8. For Geoprobe/DPT or Closed-Loop Geothermal Wells having the same
construction, only 1 GW-1 is needed. Indicate TOTAL NUMBER of wells
drilled:
9. Total well depth below land surface: (ft.)
For multiple wells list all depths if different (example- )
10. Static water level below top of casing: (ft.)
If water level is above casing,
11. Borehole diameter: (in.)
12. Well construction method:
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY:
13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test:
13b. Disinfection type: Amount:
14. WATER ZONES
FROM TO DESCRIPTION
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
15. OUTER CASING (for multi-cased wells) OR LINER (if applicable)
FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft.ft.in.
16. INNER CASING OR TUBING (geothermal closed-loop)
FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft.ft.in.
ft.ft.in.
17. SCREEN
FROM TO DIAMETER SLOT SIZE THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft.ft.in.
ft.ft.in.
18. GROUT
FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK (if applicable)
FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METHOD
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
20. DRILLING LOG (attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM TO DESCRIPTION (color, hardness, soil/rock type, grain size, etc.)
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
21. REMARKS
22. Certification:

Signature of Certified Well Contractor Date
By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance
with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a copy of this record has been provided to the well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24a
above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program,
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
24c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to
the address(es) above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of
completion of well construction to the county health department of the county
where constructed.
Terry White
3287-A
IET
one
7/6/2021 TW-1
Vacant Lot
2041 Custer St. Charlotte 28216
Mecklenburg
35 15 44 80 51 12
15
10.95
2 1/4
Direct Push
7/8/2021
10.95 15
0 5 1 sch40 PVC
5 15 1 0.010 sch40 PVC
0
3
3
15
Bentonite
#2 Sand Poured
Poured/4LB
See Consultant Log
WELL ABANDONMENT RECORD
Form GW-30 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources Revised 2-22-2016
1. Well Contractor Information:
Well Contractor Name (or well owner personally abandoning well on his/her property)
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #:
List all applicable well construction permits (i.e. UIC, County, State, Variance, etc.) if known
3. Well use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
Agricultural Municipal/Public
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)Residential Water Supply (single)
Industrial/Commercial Residential Water Supply (shared)
Irrigation
Non-Water Supply Well:
Monitoring Recovery
Injection Well:
Aquifer Recharge Groundwater Remediation
Aquifer Storage and Recovery Salinity Barrier
Aquifer Test Stormwater Drainage
Experimental Technology Subsidence Control
Geothermal (Closed Loop)Tracer
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Return) Other (explain under 7g)
4. Date well(s) abandoned:
5a. Well location:
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
Physical Address, City, and Zip
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
N W
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS OF WELL(S) BEING ABANDONED
Attach well construction record(s) if available. For multiple injection or non-water supply wells
ONLY with the same construction/abandonment, you can submit one form.
6a. Well ID#:
6b. Total well depth: (ft.)
6c. Borehole diameter: (in.)
6d. Water level below ground surface: (ft.)
6e. Outer casing length (if known): (ft.)
6f. Inner casing/tubing length (if known): (ft.)
6g. Screen length (if known): (ft.)
WELL ABANDONMENT DETAILS
7a. For Geoprobe/DPT or Closed-Loop Geothermal Wells having the same
well construction/depth, only 1 GW-30 is needed. Indicate TOTAL NUMBER of
wells abandoned:
7b. Approximate volume of water remaining in well(s): (gal.)
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY:
7c. Type of disinfectant used:
7d. Amount of disinfectant used:
7e. Sealing materials used (check all that apply):
Neat Cement Grout Bentonite Chips or Pellets
Sand Cement Grout Dry Clay
Concrete Grout Drill Cuttings
Specialty Grout Gravel
Bentonite Slurry Other (explain under 7g)
7f. For each material selected above, provide amount of materials used:
7g. Provide a brief description of the abandonment procedure:
8. Certification:
Signature of Certified Well Contractor or Well Owner Date
By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) abandoned in
accordance with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 2C .0200 Well Construction Standards
and that a copy of this record has been provided to the well owner.
9. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
abandonment details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
10a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
abandonment to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
10b. For Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 10a
above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
abandonment to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program,
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
10c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the
address(es) above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion
of well abandonment to the county health department of the county where
abandoned.
For Internal Use ONLY:
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD (GW-1) For Internal Use Only:
Form GW-1 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources Revised 2-22-2016
1. Well Contractor Information:
Well Contractor Name
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #:
List all applicable well construction permits (i.e. UIC, County, State, Variance, etc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
Agricultural Municipal/Public
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply) Residential Water Supply (single)
Industrial/Commercial Residential Water Supply (shared)
Irrigation
Non-Water Supply Well:
Monitoring Recovery
Injection Well:
Aquifer Recharge Groundwater Remediation
Aquifer Storage and Recovery Salinity Barrier
Aquifer Test Stormwater Drainage
Experimental Technology Subsidence Control
Geothermal (Closed Loop) Tracer
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Return) Other (explain under #21 Remarks)
4. Date Well(s) Completed: Well ID#
5a. Well Location:

Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)

Physical Address, City, and Zip

County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
N W
6. Is(are) the well(s): Permanent or Temporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: Yes or No
If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the
repair under #21 remarks section or on the back of this form.
8. For Geoprobe/DPT or Closed-Loop Geothermal Wells having the same
construction, only 1 GW-1 is needed. Indicate TOTAL NUMBER of wells
drilled:
9. Total well depth below land surface: (ft.)
For multiple wells list all depths if different (example- )
10. Static water level below top of casing: (ft.)
If water level is above casing,
11. Borehole diameter: (in.)
12. Well construction method:
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY:
13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test:
13b. Disinfection type: Amount:
14. WATER ZONES
FROM TO DESCRIPTION
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
15. OUTER CASING (for multi-cased wells) OR LINER (if applicable)
FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft.ft.in.
16. INNER CASING OR TUBING (geothermal closed-loop)
FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft.ft.in.
ft.ft.in.
17. SCREEN
FROM TO DIAMETER SLOT SIZE THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft.ft.in.
ft.ft.in.
18. GROUT
FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK (if applicable)
FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METHOD
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
20. DRILLING LOG (attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM TO DESCRIPTION (color, hardness, soil/rock type, grain size, etc.)
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
21. REMARKS
22. Certification:

Signature of Certified Well Contractor Date
By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance
with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a copy of this record has been provided to the well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24a
above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program,
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
24c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to
the address(es) above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of
completion of well construction to the county health department of the county
where constructed.
Terry White
3287-A
IET
one
7/6/2021 TW-2
Vacant Lot
2041 Custer St. Charlotte 28216
Mecklenburg
35 15 44 80 51 12
15
5.48
2 1/4
Direct Push
7/8/2021
5.48 15
0 5 1 sch40 PVC
5 15 1 0.010 sch40 PVC
0
3
3
15
Bentonite
#2 Sand Poured
Poured/4LB
See Consultant Log
WELL ABANDONMENT RECORD
Form GW-30 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources Revised 2-22-2016
1. Well Contractor Information:
Well Contractor Name (or well owner personally abandoning well on his/her property)
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #:
List all applicable well construction permits (i.e. UIC, County, State, Variance, etc.) if known
3. Well use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
Agricultural Municipal/Public
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)Residential Water Supply (single)
Industrial/Commercial Residential Water Supply (shared)
Irrigation
Non-Water Supply Well:
Monitoring Recovery
Injection Well:
Aquifer Recharge Groundwater Remediation
Aquifer Storage and Recovery Salinity Barrier
Aquifer Test Stormwater Drainage
Experimental Technology Subsidence Control
Geothermal (Closed Loop)Tracer
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Return) Other (explain under 7g)
4. Date well(s) abandoned:
5a. Well location:
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
Physical Address, City, and Zip
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
N W
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS OF WELL(S) BEING ABANDONED
Attach well construction record(s) if available. For multiple injection or non-water supply wells
ONLY with the same construction/abandonment, you can submit one form.
6a. Well ID#:
6b. Total well depth: (ft.)
6c. Borehole diameter: (in.)
6d. Water level below ground surface: (ft.)
6e. Outer casing length (if known): (ft.)
6f. Inner casing/tubing length (if known): (ft.)
6g. Screen length (if known): (ft.)
WELL ABANDONMENT DETAILS
7a. For Geoprobe/DPT or Closed-Loop Geothermal Wells having the same
well construction/depth, only 1 GW-30 is needed. Indicate TOTAL NUMBER of
wells abandoned:
7b. Approximate volume of water remaining in well(s): (gal.)
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY:
7c. Type of disinfectant used:
7d. Amount of disinfectant used:
7e. Sealing materials used (check all that apply):
Neat Cement Grout Bentonite Chips or Pellets
Sand Cement Grout Dry Clay
Concrete Grout Drill Cuttings
Specialty Grout Gravel
Bentonite Slurry Other (explain under 7g)
7f. For each material selected above, provide amount of materials used:
7g. Provide a brief description of the abandonment procedure:
8. Certification:
Signature of Certified Well Contractor or Well Owner Date
By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) abandoned in
accordance with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 2C .0200 Well Construction Standards
and that a copy of this record has been provided to the well owner.
9. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
abandonment details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
10a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
abandonment to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
10b. For Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 10a
above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
abandonment to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program,
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
10c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the
address(es) above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion
of well abandonment to the county health department of the county where
abandoned.
For Internal Use ONLY:
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD (GW-1) For Internal Use Only:
Form GW-1 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources Revised 2-22-2016
1. Well Contractor Information:
Well Contractor Name
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #:
List all applicable well construction permits (i.e. UIC, County, State, Variance, etc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
Agricultural Municipal/Public
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply) Residential Water Supply (single)
Industrial/Commercial Residential Water Supply (shared)
Irrigation
Non-Water Supply Well:
Monitoring Recovery
Injection Well:
Aquifer Recharge Groundwater Remediation
Aquifer Storage and Recovery Salinity Barrier
Aquifer Test Stormwater Drainage
Experimental Technology Subsidence Control
Geothermal (Closed Loop) Tracer
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Return) Other (explain under #21 Remarks)
4. Date Well(s) Completed: Well ID#
5a. Well Location:

Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)

Physical Address, City, and Zip

County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
N W
6. Is(are) the well(s): Permanent or Temporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: Yes or No
If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the
repair under #21 remarks section or on the back of this form.
8. For Geoprobe/DPT or Closed-Loop Geothermal Wells having the same
construction, only 1 GW-1 is needed. Indicate TOTAL NUMBER of wells
drilled:
9. Total well depth below land surface: (ft.)
For multiple wells list all depths if different (example- )
10. Static water level below top of casing: (ft.)
If water level is above casing,
11. Borehole diameter: (in.)
12. Well construction method:
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY:
13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test:
13b. Disinfection type: Amount:
14. WATER ZONES
FROM TO DESCRIPTION
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
15. OUTER CASING (for multi-cased wells) OR LINER (if applicable)
FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft.ft.in.
16. INNER CASING OR TUBING (geothermal closed-loop)
FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft.ft.in.
ft.ft.in.
17. SCREEN
FROM TO DIAMETER SLOT SIZE THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft.ft.in.
ft.ft.in.
18. GROUT
FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK (if applicable)
FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METHOD
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
20. DRILLING LOG (attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM TO DESCRIPTION (color, hardness, soil/rock type, grain size, etc.)
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
21. REMARKS
22. Certification:

Signature of Certified Well Contractor Date
By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance
with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a copy of this record has been provided to the well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24a
above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program,
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
24c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to
the address(es) above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of
completion of well construction to the county health department of the county
where constructed.
Terry White
3287-A
IET
one
7/6/2021 TW-3
Vacant Lot
2041 Custer St. Charlotte 28216
Mecklenburg
35 15 44 80 51 12
15
8.74
2 1/4
Direct Push
7/8/2021
8.74 15
0 5 1 sch40 PVC
5 15 1 0.010 sch40 PVC
0
3
3
15
Bentonite
#2 Sand Poured
Poured/4LB
See Consultant Log
WELL ABANDONMENT RECORD
Form GW-30 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources Revised 2-22-2016
1. Well Contractor Information:
Well Contractor Name (or well owner personally abandoning well on his/her property)
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #:
List all applicable well construction permits (i.e. UIC, County, State, Variance, etc.) if known
3. Well use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
Agricultural Municipal/Public
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)Residential Water Supply (single)
Industrial/Commercial Residential Water Supply (shared)
Irrigation
Non-Water Supply Well:
Monitoring Recovery
Injection Well:
Aquifer Recharge Groundwater Remediation
Aquifer Storage and Recovery Salinity Barrier
Aquifer Test Stormwater Drainage
Experimental Technology Subsidence Control
Geothermal (Closed Loop)Tracer
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Return) Other (explain under 7g)
4. Date well(s) abandoned:
5a. Well location:
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
Physical Address, City, and Zip
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
N W
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS OF WELL(S) BEING ABANDONED
Attach well construction record(s) if available. For multiple injection or non-water supply wells
ONLY with the same construction/abandonment, you can submit one form.
6a. Well ID#:
6b. Total well depth: (ft.)
6c. Borehole diameter: (in.)
6d. Water level below ground surface: (ft.)
6e. Outer casing length (if known): (ft.)
6f. Inner casing/tubing length (if known): (ft.)
6g. Screen length (if known): (ft.)
WELL ABANDONMENT DETAILS
7a. For Geoprobe/DPT or Closed-Loop Geothermal Wells having the same
well construction/depth, only 1 GW-30 is needed. Indicate TOTAL NUMBER of
wells abandoned:
7b. Approximate volume of water remaining in well(s): (gal.)
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY:
7c. Type of disinfectant used:
7d. Amount of disinfectant used:
7e. Sealing materials used (check all that apply):
Neat Cement Grout Bentonite Chips or Pellets
Sand Cement Grout Dry Clay
Concrete Grout Drill Cuttings
Specialty Grout Gravel
Bentonite Slurry Other (explain under 7g)
7f. For each material selected above, provide amount of materials used:
7g. Provide a brief description of the abandonment procedure:
8. Certification:
Signature of Certified Well Contractor or Well Owner Date
By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) abandoned in
accordance with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 2C .0200 Well Construction Standards
and that a copy of this record has been provided to the well owner.
9. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
abandonment details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
10a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
abandonment to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
10b. For Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 10a
above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
abandonment to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program,
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
10c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the
address(es) above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion
of well abandonment to the county health department of the county where
abandoned.
For Internal Use ONLY:
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD (GW-1) For Internal Use Only:
Form GW-1 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources Revised 2-22-2016
1. Well Contractor Information:
Well Contractor Name
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #:
List all applicable well construction permits (i.e. UIC, County, State, Variance, etc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
Agricultural Municipal/Public
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply) Residential Water Supply (single)
Industrial/Commercial Residential Water Supply (shared)
Irrigation
Non-Water Supply Well:
Monitoring Recovery
Injection Well:
Aquifer Recharge Groundwater Remediation
Aquifer Storage and Recovery Salinity Barrier
Aquifer Test Stormwater Drainage
Experimental Technology Subsidence Control
Geothermal (Closed Loop) Tracer
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Return) Other (explain under #21 Remarks)
4. Date Well(s) Completed: Well ID#
5a. Well Location:

Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)

Physical Address, City, and Zip

County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
N W
6. Is(are) the well(s): Permanent or Temporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: Yes or No
If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the
repair under #21 remarks section or on the back of this form.
8. For Geoprobe/DPT or Closed-Loop Geothermal Wells having the same
construction, only 1 GW-1 is needed. Indicate TOTAL NUMBER of wells
drilled:
9. Total well depth below land surface: (ft.)
For multiple wells list all depths if different (example- )
10. Static water level below top of casing: (ft.)
If water level is above casing,
11. Borehole diameter: (in.)
12. Well construction method:
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY:
13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test:
13b. Disinfection type: Amount:
14. WATER ZONES
FROM TO DESCRIPTION
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
15. OUTER CASING (for multi-cased wells) OR LINER (if applicable)
FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft.ft.in.
16. INNER CASING OR TUBING (geothermal closed-loop)
FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft.ft.in.
ft.ft.in.
17. SCREEN
FROM TO DIAMETER SLOT SIZE THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft.ft.in.
ft.ft.in.
18. GROUT
FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK (if applicable)
FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METHOD
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
20. DRILLING LOG (attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM TO DESCRIPTION (color, hardness, soil/rock type, grain size, etc.)
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
21. REMARKS
22. Certification:

Signature of Certified Well Contractor Date
By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance
with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a copy of this record has been provided to the well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24a
above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program,
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
24c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to
the address(es) above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of
completion of well construction to the county health department of the county
where constructed.
Terry White
3287-A
IET
one
7/6/2021 TW-4
Vacant Lot
2041 Custer St. Charlotte 28216
Mecklenburg
35 15 44 80 51 12
25
14.91
2 1/4
Direct Push
7/8/2021
14.91 25
0 15 1 sch40 PVC
15 25 1 0.010 sch40 PVC
0
13
13
25
Bentonite
#2 Sand Poured
Poured/11LB
See Consultant Log
WELL ABANDONMENT RECORD
Form GW-30 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources Revised 2-22-2016
1. Well Contractor Information:
Well Contractor Name (or well owner personally abandoning well on his/her property)
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #:
List all applicable well construction permits (i.e. UIC, County, State, Variance, etc.) if known
3. Well use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
Agricultural Municipal/Public
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)Residential Water Supply (single)
Industrial/Commercial Residential Water Supply (shared)
Irrigation
Non-Water Supply Well:
Monitoring Recovery
Injection Well:
Aquifer Recharge Groundwater Remediation
Aquifer Storage and Recovery Salinity Barrier
Aquifer Test Stormwater Drainage
Experimental Technology Subsidence Control
Geothermal (Closed Loop)Tracer
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Return) Other (explain under 7g)
4. Date well(s) abandoned:
5a. Well location:
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
Physical Address, City, and Zip
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
N W
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS OF WELL(S) BEING ABANDONED
Attach well construction record(s) if available. For multiple injection or non-water supply wells
ONLY with the same construction/abandonment, you can submit one form.
6a. Well ID#:
6b. Total well depth: (ft.)
6c. Borehole diameter: (in.)
6d. Water level below ground surface: (ft.)
6e. Outer casing length (if known): (ft.)
6f. Inner casing/tubing length (if known): (ft.)
6g. Screen length (if known): (ft.)
WELL ABANDONMENT DETAILS
7a. For Geoprobe/DPT or Closed-Loop Geothermal Wells having the same
well construction/depth, only 1 GW-30 is needed. Indicate TOTAL NUMBER of
wells abandoned:
7b. Approximate volume of water remaining in well(s): (gal.)
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY:
7c. Type of disinfectant used:
7d. Amount of disinfectant used:
7e. Sealing materials used (check all that apply):
Neat Cement Grout Bentonite Chips or Pellets
Sand Cement Grout Dry Clay
Concrete Grout Drill Cuttings
Specialty Grout Gravel
Bentonite Slurry Other (explain under 7g)
7f. For each material selected above, provide amount of materials used:
7g. Provide a brief description of the abandonment procedure:
8. Certification:
Signature of Certified Well Contractor or Well Owner Date
By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) abandoned in
accordance with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 2C .0200 Well Construction Standards
and that a copy of this record has been provided to the well owner.
9. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
abandonment details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
10a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
abandonment to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
10b. For Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 10a
above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
abandonment to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program,
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
10c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the
address(es) above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion
of well abandonment to the county health department of the county where
abandoned.
For Internal Use ONLY:

ATTACHMENT D
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD WORKSHEETS

ATTACHMENT E
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY FORMS

#=CL#
July 13, 2021
LIMS USE: FR - MATT MILLER
LIMS OBJECT ID: 92548178
92548178
Project:
Pace Project No.:
RE:
Mr. Matt Miller
WOOD E&I
2801 Yorkmont Road
Charlotte, NC 28208
Phoenix Rising
Dear Mr. Miller:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on July 07, 2021. The results relate only to the
samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the applicable TNI/NELAC Standards and the
laboratory's Quality Manual, where applicable, unless otherwise noted in the body of the report.
The test results provided in this final report were generated by each of the following laboratories within the Pace Network:
• Pace Analytical Services - Charlotte
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Ryan Brumfield
[e-mail]
Project Manager
[phone]
Enclosures
cc:Mr. Andrew Frantz, WOOD E&I
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 1 of 26
#=CP#
CERTIFICATIONS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Pace Analytical Services Charlotte
9800 Kincey Ave. Ste 100, Huntersville, NC 28078
Louisiana/NELAP Certification # LA170028
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37706
North Carolina Field Services Certification #: 5342
North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 12
South Carolina Certification #: 99006001
Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87627
Kentucky UST Certification #: 84
Virginia/VELAP Certification #: 460221
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 2 of 26
#=SA#
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Lab ID Sample ID Method
Analytes
Reported LaboratoryAnalysts
92548178001 TW-1 EPA 8260D 63 PASI-CCL
92548178002 TW-2 EPA 8260D 63 PASI-CSAS
92548178003 TW-3 EPA 8260D 63 PASI-CCL
92548178004 TW-4 EPA 8260D 63 PASI-CCL
PASI-C = Pace Analytical Services - Charlotte
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 3 of 26
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Sample:TW-1 Lab ID:92548178001 Collected:07/07/21 11:30 Received:07/07/21 15:15 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
Analytical Method: EPA 8260D
Pace Analytical Services - Charlotte
8260D MSV Low Level
Acetone ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 67-64-125.0 1
Benzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 71-43-21.0 1
Bromobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 108-86-11.0 1
Bromochloromethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 74-97-51.0 1
Bromodichloromethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 75-27-41.0 1
Bromoform ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 75-25-21.0 1
Bromomethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 74-83-92.0 1
2-Butanone (MEK)ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 78-93-35.0 1
Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 56-23-51.0 1
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 108-90-71.0 1
Chloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 75-00-31.0 1
Chloroform ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 67-66-31.0 1
Chloromethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 74-87-31.0 1
2-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 95-49-81.0 1
4-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 106-43-41.0 1
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 96-12-82.0 1
Dibromochloromethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 124-48-11.0 1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 106-93-41.0 1
Dibromomethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 74-95-31.0 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 95-50-11.0 1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 541-73-11.0 1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 106-46-71.0 1
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 75-71-8 v11.0 1
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 75-34-31.0 1
1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 107-06-21.0 1
1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 75-35-41.0 1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 156-59-21.0 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 156-60-51.0 1
1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 78-87-51.0 1
1,3-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 142-28-91.0 1
2,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 594-20-71.0 1
1,1-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 563-58-61.0 1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 10061-01-51.0 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 10061-02-61.0 1
Diisopropyl ether ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 108-20-31.0 1
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 100-41-41.0 1
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 87-68-32.0 1
2-Hexanone ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 591-78-65.0 1
p-Isopropyltoluene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 99-87-61.0 1
Methylene Chloride ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 75-09-25.0 1
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 108-10-15.0 1
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 1634-04-41.0 1
Naphthalene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 91-20-31.0 1
Styrene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 100-42-51.0 1
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 630-20-61.0 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 79-34-51.0 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/13/2021 12:53 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 4 of 26
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Sample:TW-1 Lab ID:92548178001 Collected:07/07/21 11:30 Received:07/07/21 15:15 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
Analytical Method: EPA 8260D
Pace Analytical Services - Charlotte
8260D MSV Low Level
Tetrachloroethene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 127-18-41.0 1
Toluene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 108-88-31.0 1
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 87-61-61.0 1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 120-82-11.0 1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 71-55-61.0 1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 79-00-51.0 1
Trichloroethene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 79-01-61.0 1
Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 75-69-41.0 1
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 96-18-41.0 1
Vinyl acetate ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 108-05-42.0 1
Vinyl chloride ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 75-01-41.0 1
Xylene (Total)ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 1330-20-71.0 1
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 179601-23-12.0 1
o-Xylene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:22 95-47-61.0 1
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)99 %07/09/21 18:22 460-00-470-130 1
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)113 %07/09/21 18:22 17060-07-070-130 1
Toluene-d8 (S)105 %07/09/21 18:22 2037-26-570-130 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/13/2021 12:53 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 5 of 26
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Sample:TW-2 Lab ID:92548178002 Collected:07/07/21 10:40 Received:07/07/21 15:15 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
Analytical Method: EPA 8260D
Pace Analytical Services - Charlotte
8260D MSV Low Level
Acetone ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 67-64-125.0 1
Benzene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 71-43-21.0 1
Bromobenzene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 108-86-11.0 1
Bromochloromethane ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 74-97-51.0 1
Bromodichloromethane ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 75-27-41.0 1
Bromoform ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 75-25-2 IK1.0 1
Bromomethane ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 74-83-92.0 1
2-Butanone (MEK)ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 78-93-35.0 1
Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 56-23-51.0 1
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 108-90-71.0 1
Chloroethane ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 75-00-3 IH,L11.0 1
Chloroform ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 67-66-31.0 1
Chloromethane ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 74-87-31.0 1
2-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 95-49-81.0 1
4-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 106-43-41.0 1
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 96-12-82.0 1
Dibromochloromethane ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 124-48-11.0 1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 106-93-41.0 1
Dibromomethane ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 74-95-31.0 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 95-50-11.0 1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 541-73-11.0 1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 106-46-71.0 1
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 75-71-81.0 1
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 75-34-31.0 1
1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 107-06-21.0 1
1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 75-35-41.0 1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 156-59-21.0 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 156-60-51.0 1
1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 78-87-51.0 1
1,3-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 142-28-91.0 1
2,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 594-20-71.0 1
1,1-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 563-58-61.0 1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 10061-01-51.0 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 10061-02-61.0 1
Diisopropyl ether ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 108-20-31.0 1
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 100-41-41.0 1
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 87-68-32.0 1
2-Hexanone ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 591-78-65.0 1
p-Isopropyltoluene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 99-87-61.0 1
Methylene Chloride ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 75-09-25.0 1
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 108-10-15.0 1
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 1634-04-41.0 1
Naphthalene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 91-20-31.0 1
Styrene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 100-42-51.0 1
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 630-20-61.0 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 79-34-51.0 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/13/2021 12:53 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 6 of 26
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Sample:TW-2 Lab ID:92548178002 Collected:07/07/21 10:40 Received:07/07/21 15:15 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
Analytical Method: EPA 8260D
Pace Analytical Services - Charlotte
8260D MSV Low Level
Tetrachloroethene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 127-18-41.0 1
Toluene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 108-88-31.0 1
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 87-61-61.0 1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 120-82-11.0 1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 71-55-61.0 1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 79-00-51.0 1
Trichloroethene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 79-01-61.0 1
Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 75-69-41.0 1
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 96-18-41.0 1
Vinyl acetate ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 108-05-42.0 1
Vinyl chloride ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 75-01-41.0 1
Xylene (Total)ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 1330-20-71.0 1
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 179601-23-12.0 1
o-Xylene ND ug/L 07/08/21 18:58 95-47-61.0 1
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)98 %07/08/21 18:58 460-00-470-130 1
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)97 %07/08/21 18:58 17060-07-070-130 1
Toluene-d8 (S)103 %07/08/21 18:58 2037-26-570-130 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/13/2021 12:53 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 7 of 26
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Sample:TW-3 Lab ID:92548178003 Collected:07/07/21 12:00 Received:07/07/21 15:15 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
Analytical Method: EPA 8260D
Pace Analytical Services - Charlotte
8260D MSV Low Level
Acetone ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 67-64-125.0 1
Benzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 71-43-21.0 1
Bromobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 108-86-11.0 1
Bromochloromethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 74-97-51.0 1
Bromodichloromethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 75-27-41.0 1
Bromoform ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 75-25-21.0 1
Bromomethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 74-83-92.0 1
2-Butanone (MEK)ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 78-93-35.0 1
Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 56-23-51.0 1
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 108-90-71.0 1
Chloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 75-00-31.0 1
Chloroform ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 67-66-31.0 1
Chloromethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 74-87-31.0 1
2-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 95-49-81.0 1
4-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 106-43-41.0 1
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 96-12-82.0 1
Dibromochloromethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 124-48-11.0 1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 106-93-41.0 1
Dibromomethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 74-95-31.0 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 95-50-11.0 1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 541-73-11.0 1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 106-46-71.0 1
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 75-71-8 v11.0 1
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 75-34-31.0 1
1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 107-06-21.0 1
1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 75-35-41.0 1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 156-59-21.0 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 156-60-51.0 1
1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 78-87-51.0 1
1,3-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 142-28-91.0 1
2,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 594-20-71.0 1
1,1-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 563-58-61.0 1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 10061-01-51.0 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 10061-02-61.0 1
Diisopropyl ether ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 108-20-31.0 1
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 100-41-41.0 1
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 87-68-32.0 1
2-Hexanone ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 591-78-65.0 1
p-Isopropyltoluene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 99-87-61.0 1
Methylene Chloride ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 75-09-25.0 1
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 108-10-15.0 1
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 1634-04-41.0 1
Naphthalene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 91-20-31.0 1
Styrene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 100-42-51.0 1
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 630-20-61.0 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 79-34-51.0 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/13/2021 12:53 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 8 of 26
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Sample:TW-3 Lab ID:92548178003 Collected:07/07/21 12:00 Received:07/07/21 15:15 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
Analytical Method: EPA 8260D
Pace Analytical Services - Charlotte
8260D MSV Low Level
Tetrachloroethene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 127-18-41.0 1
Toluene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 108-88-31.0 1
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 87-61-61.0 1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 120-82-11.0 1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 71-55-61.0 1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 79-00-51.0 1
Trichloroethene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 79-01-61.0 1
Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 75-69-41.0 1
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 96-18-41.0 1
Vinyl acetate ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 108-05-42.0 1
Vinyl chloride ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 75-01-41.0 1
Xylene (Total)ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 1330-20-71.0 1
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 179601-23-12.0 1
o-Xylene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:40 95-47-61.0 1
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)100 %07/09/21 18:40 460-00-470-130 1
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)110 %07/09/21 18:40 17060-07-070-130 1
Toluene-d8 (S)102 %07/09/21 18:40 2037-26-570-130 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/13/2021 12:53 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 9 of 26
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Sample:TW-4 Lab ID:92548178004 Collected:07/07/21 13:10 Received:07/07/21 15:15 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
Analytical Method: EPA 8260D
Pace Analytical Services - Charlotte
8260D MSV Low Level
Acetone ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 67-64-125.0 1
Benzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 71-43-21.0 1
Bromobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 108-86-11.0 1
Bromochloromethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 74-97-51.0 1
Bromodichloromethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 75-27-41.0 1
Bromoform ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 75-25-21.0 1
Bromomethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 74-83-92.0 1
2-Butanone (MEK)ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 78-93-35.0 1
Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 56-23-51.0 1
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 108-90-71.0 1
Chloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 75-00-31.0 1
Chloroform ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 67-66-31.0 1
Chloromethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 74-87-31.0 1
2-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 95-49-81.0 1
4-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 106-43-41.0 1
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 96-12-82.0 1
Dibromochloromethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 124-48-11.0 1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 106-93-41.0 1
Dibromomethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 74-95-31.0 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 95-50-11.0 1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 541-73-11.0 1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 106-46-71.0 1
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 75-71-8 v11.0 1
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 75-34-31.0 1
1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 107-06-21.0 1
1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 75-35-41.0 1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 156-59-21.0 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 156-60-51.0 1
1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 78-87-51.0 1
1,3-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 142-28-91.0 1
2,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 594-20-71.0 1
1,1-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 563-58-61.0 1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 10061-01-51.0 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 10061-02-61.0 1
Diisopropyl ether ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 108-20-31.0 1
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 100-41-41.0 1
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 87-68-32.0 1
2-Hexanone ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 591-78-65.0 1
p-Isopropyltoluene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 99-87-61.0 1
Methylene Chloride ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 75-09-25.0 1
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 108-10-15.0 1
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 1634-04-41.0 1
Naphthalene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 91-20-31.0 1
Styrene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 100-42-51.0 1
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 630-20-61.0 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 79-34-51.0 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/13/2021 12:53 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 10 of 26
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Sample:TW-4 Lab ID:92548178004 Collected:07/07/21 13:10 Received:07/07/21 15:15 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
Analytical Method: EPA 8260D
Pace Analytical Services - Charlotte
8260D MSV Low Level
Tetrachloroethene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 127-18-41.0 1
Toluene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 108-88-31.0 1
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 87-61-61.0 1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 120-82-11.0 1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 71-55-61.0 1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 79-00-51.0 1
Trichloroethene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 79-01-61.0 1
Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 75-69-41.0 1
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 96-18-41.0 1
Vinyl acetate ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 108-05-42.0 1
Vinyl chloride ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 75-01-41.0 1
Xylene (Total)ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 1330-20-71.0 1
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 179601-23-12.0 1
o-Xylene ND ug/L 07/09/21 18:59 95-47-61.0 1
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)97 %07/09/21 18:59 460-00-470-130 1
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)108 %07/09/21 18:59 17060-07-070-130 1
Toluene-d8 (S)104 %07/09/21 18:59 2037-26-570-130 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/13/2021 12:53 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 11 of 26
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
632081
EPA 8260D
EPA 8260D
8260D MSV Low Level
Laboratory:Pace Analytical Services - Charlotte
Associated Lab Samples:92548178002
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK:3320255
Associated Lab Samples:92548178002
Matrix:Water
Analyzed
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
1,1-Dichloropropene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L ND 2.0 07/08/21 11:58
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
1,3-Dichloropropane ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
2,2-Dichloropropane ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
2-Butanone (MEK)ug/L ND 5.0 07/08/21 11:58
2-Chlorotoluene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
2-Hexanone ug/L ND 5.0 07/08/21 11:58
4-Chlorotoluene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ug/L ND 5.0 07/08/21 11:58
Acetone ug/L ND 25.0 07/08/21 11:58
Benzene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
Bromobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
Bromochloromethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
Bromodichloromethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
Bromoform ug/L ND 1.0 IK07/08/21 11:58
Bromomethane ug/L ND 2.0 07/08/21 11:58
Carbon tetrachloride ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
Chlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
Chloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 IH07/08/21 11:58
Chloroform ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
Chloromethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
Dibromochloromethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
Dibromomethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/13/2021 12:53 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 12 of 26
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK:3320255
Associated Lab Samples:92548178002
Matrix:Water
Analyzed
Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
Diisopropyl ether ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
Ethylbenzene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/L ND 2.0 07/08/21 11:58
m&p-Xylene ug/L ND 2.0 07/08/21 11:58
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
Methylene Chloride ug/L ND 5.0 07/08/21 11:58
Naphthalene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
o-Xylene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
p-Isopropyltoluene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
Styrene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
Tetrachloroethene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
Toluene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
Trichloroethene ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
Vinyl acetate ug/L ND 2.0 07/08/21 11:58
Vinyl chloride ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
Xylene (Total)ug/L ND 1.0 07/08/21 11:58
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)%104 70-130 07/08/21 11:58
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%100 70-130 07/08/21 11:58
Toluene-d8 (S)%106 70-130 07/08/21 11:58
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
3320256LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 56.950 114 70-130
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L 55.650 111 70-130
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 53.350 107 70-130
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L 54.950 110 70-130
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L 57.550 115 70-130
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/L 53.850 108 70-132
1,1-Dichloropropene ug/L 57.250 114 70-131
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/L 56.250 112 70-134
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/L 52.350 105 70-130
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/L 57.250 114 70-130
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L 54.450 109 70-132
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/L 54.050 108 70-130
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 56.950 114 70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L 53.250 106 70-130
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 54.350 109 70-130
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 56.350 113 70-130
1,3-Dichloropropane ug/L 55.050 110 70-130
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/13/2021 12:53 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 13 of 26
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
3320256LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 55.950 112 70-130
2,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 60.850 122 70-130
2-Butanone (MEK)ug/L 111100 111 70-133
2-Chlorotoluene ug/L 54.850 110 70-130
2-Hexanone ug/L 103100 103 70-130
4-Chlorotoluene ug/L 54.950 110 70-130
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ug/L 105100 105 70-130
Acetone ug/L 104100 104 70-144
Benzene ug/L 56.350 113 70-130
Bromobenzene ug/L 53.450 107 70-130
Bromochloromethane ug/L 55.050 110 70-130
Bromodichloromethane ug/L 54.850 110 70-130
Bromoform ug/L 49.3 IK509970-131
Bromomethane ug/L 63.150 126 30-177
Carbon tetrachloride ug/L 56.350 113 70-130
Chlorobenzene ug/L 54.150 108 70-130
Chloroethane ug/L 77.4 IH,L15015546-131
Chloroform ug/L 58.750 117 70-130
Chloromethane ug/L 49.650 99 49-130
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 54.650 109 70-130
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 56.850 114 70-130
Dibromochloromethane ug/L 57.450 115 70-130
Dibromomethane ug/L 53.650 107 70-130
Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/L 53.350 107 52-134
Diisopropyl ether ug/L 54.950 110 70-131
Ethylbenzene ug/L 54.950 110 70-130
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/L 56.750 113 70-131
m&p-Xylene ug/L 112100 112 70-130
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/L 57.750 115 70-130
Methylene Chloride ug/L 53.950 108 68-130
Naphthalene ug/L 56.050 112 70-133
o-Xylene ug/L 56.150 112 70-130
p-Isopropyltoluene ug/L 63.550 127 70-130
Styrene ug/L 57.550 115 70-130
Tetrachloroethene ug/L 54.950 110 70-130
Toluene ug/L 53.450 107 70-130
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 54.750 109 70-130
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 56.050 112 70-130
Trichloroethene ug/L 55.850 112 70-130
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L 51.350 103 61-130
Vinyl acetate ug/L 129100 129 70-140
Vinyl chloride ug/L 54.350 109 59-142
Xylene (Total)ug/L 168150 112 70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)%91 70-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%101 70-130
Toluene-d8 (S)%95 70-130
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/13/2021 12:53 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 14 of 26
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qual% RecConc.
3320257MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
MSSpike
Result
92547915007
3320258
MSD
Result
MSD
% Rec RPD
MSDMS
Spike
Conc.
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 2000 119 70-135122 22000ND23902440
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L 2000 124 70-148122 12000ND24802450
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 2000 109 70-131111 12000ND21802210
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L 2000 123 70-136119 32000ND24602380
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L 2000 131 70-147130 12000ND26202610
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/L 2000 132 70-158143 92000ND26302870
1,1-Dichloropropene ug/L 2000 129 70-149131 12000ND25902620
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/L 2000 104 68-140123 162000ND20902460
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/L 2000 113 67-137113 02000ND22602250
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/L 2000 107 70-139119 112000ND21302380
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L 2000 111 69-136118 62000ND22202370
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/L 2000 113 70-137116 32000ND22602320
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 2000 118 70-133122 42000ND23502450
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L 2000 117 67-138113 42000ND23402260
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 2000 128 70-138124 32000ND25602490
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 2000 112 70-133118 52000ND22402350
1,3-Dichloropropane ug/L 2000 116 70-136116 02000ND23302320
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 2000 106 70-133113 72000ND21102270
2,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 2000 121 52-155117 42000ND24202330
2-Butanone (MEK)ug/L 4000 124 61-147126 24000ND49505030
2-Chlorotoluene ug/L 2000 108 70-141117 82000ND21602340
2-Hexanone ug/L 4000 112 67-139109 34000ND44604350
4-Chlorotoluene ug/L 2000 107 70-135112 42000ND21502230
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ug/L 4000 121 67-136116 44000ND48204630
Acetone ug/L 4000 128 55-159131 34000ND51105240
Benzene ug/L 2000 121 67-150123 12000ND24602490
Bromobenzene ug/L 2000 110 70-134119 72000ND22002370
Bromochloromethane ug/L 2000 124 70-146119 42000ND24702370
Bromodichloromethane ug/L 2000 123 70-138123 02000ND24602460
Bromoform ug/L IK200010157-138104 32000ND20202080
Bromomethane ug/L 2000 95 10-20098 32000ND19001960
Carbon tetrachloride ug/L 2000 129 70-147133 32000ND25802650
Chlorobenzene ug/L 2000 116 70-137117 12000ND23202330
Chloroethane ug/L IH200013151-166140 62000ND26302800
Chloroform ug/L 2000 132 70-144135 22000ND27002760
Chloromethane ug/L 2000 132 24-161130 12000ND26302600
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 2000 126 67-148127 12000ND25202540
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 2000 121 70-142121 02000ND24202420
Dibromochloromethane ug/L 2000 122 68-138118 32000ND24402350
Dibromomethane ug/L 2000 130 70-134127 22000ND26002540
Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/L 2000 106 43-155109 32000ND21202180
Diisopropyl ether ug/L 2000 130 65-146130 02000ND26102600
Ethylbenzene ug/L 2000 116 68-143115 12000256048904860
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/L 2000 106 62-151119 122000ND21102380
m&p-Xylene ug/L 4000 104 53-157113 3400092801350013800
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/L 2000 131 59-156122 72000ND26102450
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/13/2021 12:53 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 15 of 26
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qual% RecConc.
3320257MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
MSSpike
Result
92547915007
3320258
MSD
Result
MSD
% Rec RPD
MSDMS
Spike
Conc.
Methylene Chloride ug/L 2000 133 64-148130 22000ND26702610
Naphthalene ug/L 2000 98 57-150116 13200083627903160
o-Xylene ug/L 2000 112 68-143116 12000414063906460
p-Isopropyltoluene ug/L 2000 117 70-141127 92000ND23402550
Styrene ug/L 2000 116 70-136121 42000ND24002500
Tetrachloroethene ug/L 2000 119 70-139124 42000ND23902490
Toluene ug/L 2000 86 47-15776 12000134001510014900
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 2000 129 70-149125 42000ND25802490
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 2000 118 70-138117 12000ND23602350
Trichloroethene ug/L 2000 123 70-149127 32000ND24602540
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L 2000 127 61-154120 62000ND25402390
Vinyl acetate ug/L 4000 136 48-156136 04000ND54305420
Vinyl chloride ug/L 2000 127 55-172127 02000ND25302540
Xylene (Total)ug/L 6000 107 66-145114 26000134001980020300
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)%95 70-13094
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%97 70-13097
Toluene-d8 (S)%98 70-13098
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/13/2021 12:53 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 16 of 26
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
632411
EPA 8260D
EPA 8260D
8260D MSV Low Level
Laboratory:Pace Analytical Services - Charlotte
Associated Lab Samples:92548178001, 92548178003, 92548178004
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK:3322039
Associated Lab Samples:92548178001, 92548178003, 92548178004
Matrix:Water
Analyzed
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
1,1-Dichloropropene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L ND 2.0 07/09/21 14:24
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
1,3-Dichloropropane ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
2,2-Dichloropropane ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
2-Butanone (MEK)ug/L ND 5.0 07/09/21 14:24
2-Chlorotoluene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
2-Hexanone ug/L ND 5.0 07/09/21 14:24
4-Chlorotoluene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ug/L ND 5.0 07/09/21 14:24
Acetone ug/L ND 25.0 07/09/21 14:24
Benzene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Bromobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Bromochloromethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Bromodichloromethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Bromoform ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Bromomethane ug/L ND 2.0 07/09/21 14:24
Carbon tetrachloride ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Chlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Chloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Chloroform ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Chloromethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Dibromochloromethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Dibromomethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/13/2021 12:53 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 17 of 26
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK:3322039
Associated Lab Samples:92548178001, 92548178003, 92548178004
Matrix:Water
Analyzed
Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/L ND 1.0 v107/09/21 14:24
Diisopropyl ether ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Ethylbenzene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/L ND 2.0 07/09/21 14:24
m&p-Xylene ug/L ND 2.0 07/09/21 14:24
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Methylene Chloride ug/L ND 5.0 07/09/21 14:24
Naphthalene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
o-Xylene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
p-Isopropyltoluene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Styrene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Tetrachloroethene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Toluene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Trichloroethene ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Vinyl acetate ug/L ND 2.0 07/09/21 14:24
Vinyl chloride ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
Xylene (Total)ug/L ND 1.0 07/09/21 14:24
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)%101 70-130 07/09/21 14:24
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%101 70-130 07/09/21 14:24
Toluene-d8 (S)%102 70-130 07/09/21 14:24
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
3322040LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 53.350 107 70-130
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L 50.650 101 70-130
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 54.150 108 70-130
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L 53.850 108 70-130
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L 49.350 99 70-130
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/L 51.550 103 70-132
1,1-Dichloropropene ug/L 47.550 95 70-131
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/L 55.050 110 70-134
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/L 52.250 104 70-130
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/L 54.050 108 70-130
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L 54.450 109 70-132
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/L 52.950 106 70-130
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 52.550 105 70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L 47.550 95 70-130
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 52.950 106 70-130
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 52.850 106 70-130
1,3-Dichloropropane ug/L 51.650 103 70-130
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/13/2021 12:53 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 18 of 26
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
3322040LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 52.750 105 70-130
2,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 53.450 107 70-130
2-Butanone (MEK)ug/L 111100 111 70-133
2-Chlorotoluene ug/L 50.750 101 70-130
2-Hexanone ug/L 116100 116 70-130
4-Chlorotoluene ug/L 49.350 99 70-130
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ug/L 112100 112 70-130
Acetone ug/L 119100 119 70-144
Benzene ug/L 51.450 103 70-130
Bromobenzene ug/L 51.150 102 70-130
Bromochloromethane ug/L 50.350 101 70-130
Bromodichloromethane ug/L 52.550 105 70-130
Bromoform ug/L 55.550 111 70-131
Bromomethane ug/L 45.650 91 30-177
Carbon tetrachloride ug/L 52.950 106 70-130
Chlorobenzene ug/L 51.050 102 70-130
Chloroethane ug/L 51.250 102 46-131
Chloroform ug/L 48.450 97 70-130
Chloromethane ug/L 49.850 100 49-130
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 49.950 100 70-130
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 52.450 105 70-130
Dibromochloromethane ug/L 54.850 110 70-130
Dibromomethane ug/L 54.250 108 70-130
Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/L 61.5 v15012352-134
Diisopropyl ether ug/L 49.250 98 70-131
Ethylbenzene ug/L 50.950 102 70-130
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/L 52.950 106 70-131
m&p-Xylene ug/L 103100 103 70-130
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/L 50.350 101 70-130
Methylene Chloride ug/L 49.850 100 68-130
Naphthalene ug/L 55.750 111 70-133
o-Xylene ug/L 51.450 103 70-130
p-Isopropyltoluene ug/L 52.050 104 70-130
Styrene ug/L 54.150 108 70-130
Tetrachloroethene ug/L 50.150 100 70-130
Toluene ug/L 51.450 103 70-130
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 50.350 101 70-130
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 54.450 109 70-130
Trichloroethene ug/L 50.450 101 70-130
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L 57.750 115 61-130
Vinyl acetate ug/L 114100 114 70-140
Vinyl chloride ug/L 51.650 103 59-142
Xylene (Total)ug/L 154150 103 70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)%95 70-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%101 70-130
Toluene-d8 (S)%98 70-130
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/13/2021 12:53 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 19 of 26
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qual% RecConc.
3322041MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
MSSpike
Result
92548198012
3322042
MSD
Result
MSD
% Rec RPD
MSDMS
Spike
Conc.
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 8000 114 70-135117 38000ND90809380
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L 8000 123 70-148125 28000ND98109980
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 8000 112 70-131113 18000ND89809050
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L 8000 110 70-136116 58000ND88209260
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L 8000 119 70-147118 18000ND95309410
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/L 8000 122 70-158123 18000ND97509810
1,1-Dichloropropene ug/L 8000 113 70-149116 28000ND90509270
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/L 8000 102 68-140109 68000ND81608690
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/L 8000 105 67-137106 18000ND83908460
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/L 8000 101 70-139109 88000ND80908730
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L 8000 99 69-136108 98000ND79008670
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/L 8000 111 70-137114 38000ND88709100
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 8000 108 70-133110 28000ND86008810
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L 8000 114 67-138115 18000ND90809190
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 8000 117 70-138119 18000ND94009530
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 8000 107 70-133112 48000ND85708960
1,3-Dichloropropane ug/L 8000 110 70-136110 08000ND88108820
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 8000 108 70-133109 18000ND86708730
2,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 8000 100 52-155108 88000ND80008660
2-Butanone (MEK)ug/L 16000 104 61-147111 616000ND1670017700
2-Chlorotoluene ug/L 8000 112 70-141113 28000ND89309080
2-Hexanone ug/L 16000 107 67-139111 416000ND1710017800
4-Chlorotoluene ug/L 8000 105 70-135106 18000ND83908500
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ug/L 16000 106 67-136110 416000ND1690017600
Acetone ug/L 16000 112 55-159116 416000ND1790018600
Benzene ug/L 8000 117 67-150113 38000ND93509050
Bromobenzene ug/L 8000 110 70-134112 28000ND87608970
Bromochloromethane ug/L 8000 111 70-146123 108000ND88809810
Bromodichloromethane ug/L 8000 113 70-138118 48000ND90709400
Bromoform ug/L 8000 106 57-138107 18000ND84408550
Bromomethane ug/L 8000 110 10-200110 08000ND88308830
Carbon tetrachloride ug/L 8000 118 70-147120 28000ND94309620
Chlorobenzene ug/L 8000 113 70-137114 18000ND90409090
Chloroethane ug/L 8000 148 51-166153 48000ND1180012300
Chloroform ug/L 8000 120 70-144126 58000ND957010100
Chloromethane ug/L 8000 100 24-161103 38000ND80308250
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 8000 115 67-148116 1800032201240012500
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 8000 107 70-142110 28000ND85808780
Dibromochloromethane ug/L 8000 113 68-138115 28000ND90709220
Dibromomethane ug/L 8000 111 70-134113 18000ND88909020
Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/L v1800010443-155109 58000ND82908700
Diisopropyl ether ug/L 8000 106 65-146111 58000ND84508840
Ethylbenzene ug/L 8000 114 68-143113 18000ND91509040
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/L 8000 105 62-151110 58000ND84308830
m&p-Xylene ug/L 16000 113 53-157112 116000ND1800017900
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/L 8000 103 59-156113 108000ND82409080
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/13/2021 12:53 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 20 of 26
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qual% RecConc.
3322041MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
MSSpike
Result
92548198012
3322042
MSD
Result
MSD
% Rec RPD
MSDMS
Spike
Conc.
Methylene Chloride ug/L 8000 115 64-148112 38000ND98909640
Naphthalene ug/L 8000 102 57-150110 78000ND81508760
o-Xylene ug/L 8000 111 68-143114 38000ND88909150
p-Isopropyltoluene ug/L 8000 107 70-141110 38000ND85308830
Styrene ug/L 8000 113 70-136115 28000ND90409190
Tetrachloroethene ug/L 8000 109 70-139110 18000ND87408810
Toluene ug/L 8000 115 47-157114 08000ND91609130
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 8000 118 70-149122 38000ND94409730
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 8000 107 70-138110 38000ND85308780
Trichloroethene ug/L 8000 136 70-149116 38000366004750045900
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L 8000 125 61-154129 48000ND999010300
Vinyl acetate ug/L 16000 118 48-156124 516000ND1880019800
Vinyl chloride ug/L 8000 112 55-172118 58000ND89909420
Xylene (Total)ug/L 24000 112 66-145113 024000ND2690027100
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)%104 70-130100
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%100 70-130100
Toluene-d8 (S)%100 70-13099
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/13/2021 12:53 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 21 of 26
#=QL#
QUALIFIERS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
DEFINITIONS
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to dilution of the sample aliquot.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
TNTC - Too Numerous To Count
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL - Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit.
RL - Reporting Limit - The lowest concentration value that meets project requirements for quantitative data with known precision and
bias for a specific analyte in a specific matrix.
S - Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine decomposes to and cannot be separated from Azobenzene using Method 8270. The result for each analyte is
a combined concentration.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
SG - Silica Gel - Clean-Up
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2 Chloroethylvinyl ether.
A separate vial preserved to a pH of 4-5 is recommended in SW846 Chapter 4 for the analysis of Acrolein and Acrylonitrile by EPAMethod 8260.
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
TNI - The NELAC Institute.
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
This analyte exceeded secondary source verification criteria high for the initial calibration. The reported results should be
considered an estimated value.IH
The recalculated concentration of the calibration standard(s) did not meet method acceptance criteria; this result should
be considered an estimated value.IK
Analyte recovery in the laboratory control sample (LCS) was above QC limits. Results for this analyte in associated
samples may be biased high.L1
The continuing calibration verification was above the method acceptance limit. Any detection for the analyte in the
associated samples may have a high bias.v1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/13/2021 12:53 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 22 of 26
#=CR#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548178
Phoenix Rising
Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method QC Batch Analytical Method
Analytical
Batch
92548178001 632411TW-1 EPA 8260D
92548178002 632081TW-2 EPA 8260D
92548178003 632411TW-3 EPA 8260D
92548178004 632411TW-4 EPA 8260D
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/13/2021 12:53 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 23 of 26
Page 24 of 26
Page 25 of 26
Page 26 of 26
#=CL#
July 14, 2021
LIMS USE: FR - MATT MILLER
LIMS OBJECT ID: 92548079
92548079
Project:
Pace Project No.:
RE:
Mr. Matt Miller
WOOD E&I
2801 Yorkmont Road
Charlotte, NC 28208
PHOENIX RISING
Dear Mr. Miller:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on July 07, 2021. The results relate only to the
samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the applicable TNI/NELAC Standards and the
laboratory's Quality Manual, where applicable, unless otherwise noted in the body of the report.
The test results provided in this final report were generated by each of the following laboratories within the Pace Network:
• Pace Analytical Services - Minneapolis
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Ryan Brumfield
[e-mail]
Project Manager
[phone]
Enclosures
cc:Mr. Andrew Frantz, WOOD E&I
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 1 of 20
#=CP#
CERTIFICATIONS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548079
PHOENIX RISING
Pace Analytical Services, LLC - Minneapolis MN
1700 Elm Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414
1800 Elm Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414--Satellite Air
Lab
A2LA Certification #: 2926.01*
Alabama Certification #: 40770
Alaska Contaminated Sites Certification #: 17-009*
Alaska DW Certification #: MN00064
Arizona Certification #: AZ0014*
Arkansas DW Certification #: MN00064
Arkansas WW Certification #: 88-0680
California Certification #: 2929
Colorado Certification #: MN00064
Connecticut Certification #: PH-0256
EPA Region 8 Tribal Water Systems+Wyoming DW
Certification #: via MN 027-053-137
Florida Certification #: E87605*
Georgia Certification #: 959
Hawaii Certification #: MN00064
Idaho Certification #: MN00064
Illinois Certification #: 200011
Indiana Certification #: C-MN-01
Iowa Certification #: 368
Kansas Certification #: E-10167
Kentucky DW Certification #: 90062
Kentucky WW Certification #: 90062
Louisiana DEQ Certification #: AI-03086*
Louisiana DW Certification #: MN00064
Maine Certification #: MN00064*
Maryland Certification #: 322
Michigan Certification #: 9909
Minnesota Certification #: 027-053-137*
Minnesota Dept of Ag Approval: via MN 027-053-137
Minnesota Petrofund Registration #: 1240*
Mississippi Certification #: MN00064
Missouri Certification #: 10100
Montana Certification #: CERT0092
Nebraska Certification #: NE-OS-18-06
Nevada Certification #: MN00064
New Hampshire Certification #: 2081*
New Jersey Certification #: MN002
New York Certification #: 11647*
North Carolina DW Certification #: 27700
North Carolina WW Certification #: 530
North Dakota Certification #: R-036
Ohio DW Certification #: 41244
Ohio VAP Certification (1700) #: CL101
Ohio VAP Certification (1800) #: CL110*
Oklahoma Certification #: 9507*
Oregon Primary Certification #: MN300001
Oregon Secondary Certification #: MN200001*
Pennsylvania Certification #: 68-00563*
Puerto Rico Certification #: MN00064
South Carolina Certification #:74003001
Tennessee Certification #: TN02818
Texas Certification #: T104704192*
Utah Certification #: MN00064*
Vermont Certification #: VT-027053137
Virginia Certification #: 460163*
Washington Certification #: C486*
West Virginia DEP Certification #: 382
West Virginia DW Certification #: 9952 C
Wisconsin Certification #: 999407970
Wyoming UST Certification #: via A2LA 2926.01
USDA Permit #: P330-19-00208
*Please Note: Applicable air certifications are denoted with
an asterisk (*).
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 2 of 20
#=SA#
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548079
PHOENIX RISING
Lab ID Sample ID Method
Analytes
Reported LaboratoryAnalysts
92548079001 SG-1 TO-15 61 PASI-MMJL
92548079002 SG-2 TO-15 61 PASI-MMJL
92548079003 SG-3 TO-15 61 PASI-MMJL
92548079004 SG-4 TO-15 61 PASI-MMJL
PASI-M = Pace Analytical Services - Minneapolis
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 3 of 20
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548079
PHOENIX RISING
Sample:SG-1 Lab ID:92548079001 Collected:07/06/21 14:36 Received:07/07/21 15:15 Matrix:Air
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
Analytical Method: TO-15
Pace Analytical Services - Minneapolis
TO15 MSV AIR
Acetone 49.8 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 67-64-111.3 1.87
Benzene 43.4 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 71-43-23.0 1.87
Benzyl chloride ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 100-44-74.9 1.87
Bromodichloromethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 75-27-42.5 1.87
Bromoform ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 75-25-29.8 1.87
Bromomethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 74-83-91.5 1.87
1,3-Butadiene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 106-99-00.84 1.87
2-Butanone (MEK)16.8 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 78-93-35.6 1.87
Carbon disulfide 117 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 75-15-01.2 1.87
Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 56-23-52.4 1.87
Chlorobenzene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 108-90-71.8 1.87
Chloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 75-00-31.0 1.87
Chloroform ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 67-66-34.6 1.87
Chloromethane 3.2 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 74-87-30.79 1.87
Cyclohexane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 110-82-73.3 1.87
Dibromochloromethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 124-48-13.2 1.87
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 106-93-41.5 1.87
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 95-50-15.7 1.87
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 541-73-15.7 1.87
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 106-46-75.7 1.87
Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.8 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 75-71-81.9 1.87
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 75-34-31.5 1.87
1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 107-06-21.5 1.87
1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 75-35-41.5 1.87
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 156-59-21.5 1.87
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 156-60-51.5 1.87
1,2-Dichloropropane 4.5 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 78-87-51.8 1.87
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 10061-01-54.3 1.87
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 10061-02-64.3 1.87
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 76-14-22.7 1.87
Ethanol 29.3 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 64-17-53.6 1.87
Ethyl acetate ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 141-78-61.4 1.87
Ethylbenzene 16.4 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 100-41-41.7 1.87
4-Ethyltoluene 8.6 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 622-96-84.7 1.87
n-Heptane 14.8 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 142-82-51.6 1.87
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 87-68-310.1 1.87
n-Hexane 58.2 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 110-54-31.3 1.87
2-Hexanone 27.1 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 591-78-67.8 1.87
Methylene Chloride ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 75-09-26.6 1.87
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)101 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 108-10-17.8 1.87
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 1634-04-46.8 1.87
Naphthalene 7.0 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 91-20-35.0 1.87
2-Propanol 7.6 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 67-63-04.7 1.87
Propylene 88.4 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 115-07-11.6 1.87
Styrene 2.0 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 100-42-51.6 1.87
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 79-34-52.6 1.87
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/14/2021 06:17 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 4 of 20
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548079
PHOENIX RISING
Sample:SG-1 Lab ID:92548079001 Collected:07/06/21 14:36 Received:07/07/21 15:15 Matrix:Air
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
Analytical Method: TO-15
Pace Analytical Services - Minneapolis
TO15 MSV AIR
Tetrachloroethene 14.8 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 127-18-4 C81.3 1.87
Tetrahydrofuran ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 109-99-91.1 1.87
Toluene 1510 ug/m3 07/14/21 01:38 108-88-314.3 18.7
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 120-82-114.1 1.87
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 71-55-62.1 1.87
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 79-00-51.0 1.87
Trichloroethene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 79-01-61.0 1.87
Trichlorofluoromethane 6.0 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 75-69-42.1 1.87
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 76-13-12.9 1.87
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 28.2 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 95-63-61.9 1.87
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 7.8 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 108-67-81.9 1.87
Vinyl acetate ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 108-05-41.3 1.87
Vinyl chloride ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 75-01-40.49 1.87
m&p-Xylene 51.8 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 179601-23-13.3 1.87
o-Xylene 22.0 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:01 95-47-61.7 1.87
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/14/2021 06:17 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 5 of 20
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548079
PHOENIX RISING
Sample:SG-2 Lab ID:92548079002 Collected:07/06/21 15:04 Received:07/07/21 15:15 Matrix:Air
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
Analytical Method: TO-15
Pace Analytical Services - Minneapolis
TO15 MSV AIR
Acetone 53.6 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 67-64-112.2 2.02
Benzene 55.9 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 71-43-23.3 2.02
Benzyl chloride ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 100-44-75.3 2.02
Bromodichloromethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 75-27-42.7 2.02
Bromoform ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 75-25-210.6 2.02
Bromomethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 74-83-91.6 2.02
1,3-Butadiene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 106-99-00.91 2.02
2-Butanone (MEK)17.4 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 78-93-36.1 2.02
Carbon disulfide 55.4 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 75-15-01.3 2.02
Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 56-23-52.6 2.02
Chlorobenzene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 108-90-71.9 2.02
Chloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 75-00-31.1 2.02
Chloroform ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 67-66-35.0 2.02
Chloromethane 1.8 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 74-87-30.85 2.02
Cyclohexane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 110-82-73.5 2.02
Dibromochloromethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 124-48-13.5 2.02
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 106-93-41.6 2.02
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 95-50-16.2 2.02
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 541-73-16.2 2.02
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 106-46-76.2 2.02
Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.8 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 75-71-82.0 2.02
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 75-34-31.7 2.02
1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 107-06-21.7 2.02
1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 75-35-41.6 2.02
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 156-59-21.6 2.02
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 156-60-51.6 2.02
1,2-Dichloropropane 5.5 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 78-87-51.9 2.02
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 10061-01-54.7 2.02
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 10061-02-64.7 2.02
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 76-14-22.9 2.02
Ethanol 18.3 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 64-17-53.9 2.02
Ethyl acetate ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 141-78-61.5 2.02
Ethylbenzene 17.4 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 100-41-41.8 2.02
4-Ethyltoluene 6.9 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 622-96-85.0 2.02
n-Heptane 10.4 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 142-82-51.7 2.02
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 87-68-310.9 2.02
n-Hexane 18.1 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 110-54-31.4 2.02
2-Hexanone 25.8 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 591-78-68.4 2.02
Methylene Chloride ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 75-09-27.1 2.02
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)82.2 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 108-10-18.4 2.02
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 1634-04-47.4 2.02
Naphthalene 7.5 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 91-20-35.4 2.02
2-Propanol ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 67-63-05.0 2.02
Propylene 37.6 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 115-07-11.8 2.02
Styrene 2.1 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 100-42-51.7 2.02
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 79-34-52.8 2.02
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/14/2021 06:17 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 6 of 20
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548079
PHOENIX RISING
Sample:SG-2 Lab ID:92548079002 Collected:07/06/21 15:04 Received:07/07/21 15:15 Matrix:Air
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
Analytical Method: TO-15
Pace Analytical Services - Minneapolis
TO15 MSV AIR
Tetrachloroethene 105 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 127-18-4 C81.4 2.02
Tetrahydrofuran ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 109-99-91.2 2.02
Toluene 4360 ug/m3 07/14/21 10:27 108-88-346.4 60.6
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 120-82-115.2 2.02
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 71-55-62.2 2.02
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 79-00-51.1 2.02
Trichloroethene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 79-01-61.1 2.02
Trichlorofluoromethane 9.2 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 75-69-42.3 2.02
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane 3.2 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 76-13-13.2 2.02
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 21.6 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 95-63-62.0 2.02
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 6.3 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 108-67-82.0 2.02
Vinyl acetate ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 108-05-41.4 2.02
Vinyl chloride ND ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 75-01-40.53 2.02
m&p-Xylene 44.3 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 179601-23-13.6 2.02
o-Xylene 18.6 ug/m3 07/12/21 22:34 95-47-61.8 2.02
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/14/2021 06:17 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 7 of 20
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548079
PHOENIX RISING
Sample:SG-3 Lab ID:92548079003 Collected:07/06/21 15:24 Received:07/07/21 15:15 Matrix:Air
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
Analytical Method: TO-15
Pace Analytical Services - Minneapolis
TO15 MSV AIR
Acetone 78.3 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 67-64-112.2 2.02
Benzene 48.3 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 71-43-23.3 2.02
Benzyl chloride ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 100-44-75.3 2.02
Bromodichloromethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 75-27-42.7 2.02
Bromoform ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 75-25-210.6 2.02
Bromomethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 74-83-91.6 2.02
1,3-Butadiene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 106-99-00.91 2.02
2-Butanone (MEK)27.3 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 78-93-36.1 2.02
Carbon disulfide 49.4 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 75-15-01.3 2.02
Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 56-23-52.6 2.02
Chlorobenzene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 108-90-71.9 2.02
Chloroethane 4.3 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 75-00-31.1 2.02
Chloroform ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 67-66-35.0 2.02
Chloromethane 21.9 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 74-87-30.85 2.02
Cyclohexane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 110-82-73.5 2.02
Dibromochloromethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 124-48-13.5 2.02
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 106-93-41.6 2.02
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 95-50-16.2 2.02
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 541-73-16.2 2.02
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 106-46-76.2 2.02
Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.9 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 75-71-82.0 2.02
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 75-34-31.7 2.02
1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 107-06-21.7 2.02
1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 75-35-41.6 2.02
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 156-59-21.6 2.02
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 156-60-51.6 2.02
1,2-Dichloropropane 3.8 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 78-87-51.9 2.02
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 10061-01-54.7 2.02
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 10061-02-64.7 2.02
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 76-14-22.9 2.02
Ethanol 25.6 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 64-17-53.9 2.02
Ethyl acetate ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 141-78-61.5 2.02
Ethylbenzene 17.9 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 100-41-41.8 2.02
4-Ethyltoluene 8.3 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 622-96-85.0 2.02
n-Heptane 15.9 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 142-82-51.7 2.02
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 87-68-310.9 2.02
n-Hexane 31.8 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 110-54-31.4 2.02
2-Hexanone 28.8 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 591-78-68.4 2.02
Methylene Chloride ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 75-09-27.1 2.02
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)82.4 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 108-10-18.4 2.02
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 1634-04-47.4 2.02
Naphthalene 7.4 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 91-20-35.4 2.02
2-Propanol ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 67-63-05.0 2.02
Propylene 626 ug/m3 07/14/21 02:34 115-07-117.7 20.2
Styrene 4.4 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 100-42-51.7 2.02
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 79-34-52.8 2.02
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/14/2021 06:17 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 8 of 20
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548079
PHOENIX RISING
Sample:SG-3 Lab ID:92548079003 Collected:07/06/21 15:24 Received:07/07/21 15:15 Matrix:Air
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
Analytical Method: TO-15
Pace Analytical Services - Minneapolis
TO15 MSV AIR
Tetrachloroethene 7.5 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 127-18-4 C81.4 2.02
Tetrahydrofuran ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 109-99-91.2 2.02
Toluene 1580 ug/m3 07/14/21 02:34 108-88-315.5 20.2
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 120-82-115.2 2.02
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 71-55-62.2 2.02
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 79-00-51.1 2.02
Trichloroethene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 79-01-61.1 2.02
Trichlorofluoromethane 7.8 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 75-69-42.3 2.02
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane 3.4 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 76-13-13.2 2.02
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 28.4 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 95-63-62.0 2.02
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 7.4 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 108-67-82.0 2.02
Vinyl acetate ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 108-05-41.4 2.02
Vinyl chloride 2.7 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 75-01-40.53 2.02
m&p-Xylene 54.9 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 179601-23-13.6 2.02
o-Xylene 23.0 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:28 95-47-61.8 2.02
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/14/2021 06:17 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 9 of 20
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548079
PHOENIX RISING
Sample:SG-4 Lab ID:92548079004 Collected:07/06/21 15:44 Received:07/07/21 15:15 Matrix:Air
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
Analytical Method: TO-15
Pace Analytical Services - Minneapolis
TO15 MSV AIR
Acetone 60.2 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 67-64-111.7 1.94
Benzene 44.6 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 71-43-23.2 1.94
Benzyl chloride ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 100-44-75.1 1.94
Bromodichloromethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 75-27-42.6 1.94
Bromoform ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 75-25-210.2 1.94
Bromomethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 74-83-91.5 1.94
1,3-Butadiene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 106-99-00.87 1.94
2-Butanone (MEK)9.6 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 78-93-35.8 1.94
Carbon disulfide 28.8 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 75-15-01.2 1.94
Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 56-23-52.5 1.94
Chlorobenzene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 108-90-71.8 1.94
Chloroethane 2.4 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 75-00-31.0 1.94
Chloroform ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 67-66-34.8 1.94
Chloromethane 11.0 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 74-87-30.81 1.94
Cyclohexane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 110-82-73.4 1.94
Dibromochloromethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 124-48-13.4 1.94
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 106-93-41.5 1.94
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 95-50-15.9 1.94
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 541-73-15.9 1.94
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 106-46-75.9 1.94
Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.7 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 75-71-82.0 1.94
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 75-34-31.6 1.94
1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 107-06-21.6 1.94
1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 75-35-41.6 1.94
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 156-59-21.6 1.94
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 156-60-51.6 1.94
1,2-Dichloropropane 2.5 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 78-87-51.8 1.94
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 10061-01-54.5 1.94
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 10061-02-64.5 1.94
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 76-14-22.8 1.94
Ethanol 13.5 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 64-17-53.7 1.94
Ethyl acetate ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 141-78-61.4 1.94
Ethylbenzene 12.4 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 100-41-41.7 1.94
4-Ethyltoluene 5.2 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 622-96-84.8 1.94
n-Heptane 16.3 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 142-82-51.6 1.94
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 87-68-310.5 1.94
n-Hexane 35.9 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 110-54-31.4 1.94
2-Hexanone ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 591-78-68.1 1.94
Methylene Chloride ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 75-09-26.8 1.94
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)42.9 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 108-10-18.1 1.94
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 1634-04-47.1 1.94
Naphthalene 5.5 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 91-20-35.2 1.94
2-Propanol ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 67-63-04.8 1.94
Propylene 1100 ug/m3 07/13/21 00:20 115-07-150.9 58.2
Styrene 4.7 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 100-42-51.7 1.94
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 79-34-52.7 1.94
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/14/2021 06:17 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 10 of 20
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548079
PHOENIX RISING
Sample:SG-4 Lab ID:92548079004 Collected:07/06/21 15:44 Received:07/07/21 15:15 Matrix:Air
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
Analytical Method: TO-15
Pace Analytical Services - Minneapolis
TO15 MSV AIR
Tetrachloroethene 9.2 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 127-18-41.3 1.94
Tetrahydrofuran ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 109-99-91.2 1.94
Toluene 1930 ug/m3 07/13/21 00:20 108-88-344.6 58.2
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 120-82-114.6 1.94
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 71-55-62.2 1.94
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 79-00-51.1 1.94
Trichloroethene ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 79-01-61.1 1.94
Trichlorofluoromethane 3.4 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 75-69-42.2 1.94
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 76-13-13.0 1.94
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 17.8 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 95-63-61.9 1.94
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 5.1 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 108-67-81.9 1.94
Vinyl acetate ND ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 108-05-41.4 1.94
Vinyl chloride 3.6 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 75-01-40.50 1.94
m&p-Xylene 35.5 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 179601-23-13.4 1.94
o-Xylene 15.3 ug/m3 07/12/21 23:55 95-47-61.7 1.94
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/14/2021 06:17 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 11 of 20
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548079
PHOENIX RISING
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
755496
TO-15
TO-15
TO15 MSV AIR Low Level
Laboratory:Pace Analytical Services - Minneapolis
Associated Lab Samples:92548079001, 92548079002, 92548079003, 92548079004
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK:4028316
Associated Lab Samples:92548079001, 92548079002, 92548079003, 92548079004
Matrix:Air
Analyzed
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/m3 ND 0.56 07/12/21 09:47
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/m3 ND 0.70 07/12/21 09:47
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/m3 ND 0.28 07/12/21 09:47
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane ug/m3 ND 0.78 07/12/21 09:47
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/m3 ND 0.41 07/12/21 09:47
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/m3 ND 0.40 07/12/21 09:47
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/m3 ND 3.8 07/12/21 09:47
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/m3 ND 0.50 07/12/21 09:47
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/m3 ND 0.39 07/12/21 09:47
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 ND 1.5 07/12/21 09:47
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/m3 ND 0.41 07/12/21 09:47
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/m3 ND 0.47 07/12/21 09:47
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/m3 ND 0.50 07/12/21 09:47
1,3-Butadiene ug/m3 ND 0.22 07/12/21 09:47
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 ND 1.5 07/12/21 09:47
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 ND 1.5 07/12/21 09:47
2-Butanone (MEK)ug/m3 ND 1.5 07/12/21 09:47
2-Hexanone ug/m3 ND 2.1 07/12/21 09:47
2-Propanol ug/m3 ND 1.2 07/12/21 09:47
4-Ethyltoluene ug/m3 ND 1.2 07/12/21 09:47
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ug/m3 ND 2.1 07/12/21 09:47
Acetone ug/m3 ND 3.0 07/12/21 09:47
Benzene ug/m3 ND 0.81 MN07/12/21 09:47
Benzyl chloride ug/m3 ND 1.3 07/12/21 09:47
Bromodichloromethane ug/m3 ND 0.68 07/12/21 09:47
Bromoform ug/m3 ND 2.6 07/12/21 09:47
Bromomethane ug/m3 ND 0.39 07/12/21 09:47
Carbon disulfide ug/m3 ND 0.32 07/12/21 09:47
Carbon tetrachloride ug/m3 ND 0.64 07/12/21 09:47
Chlorobenzene ug/m3 ND 0.47 07/12/21 09:47
Chloroethane ug/m3 ND 0.27 07/12/21 09:47
Chloroform ug/m3 ND 1.2 MN07/12/21 09:47
Chloromethane ug/m3 ND 0.21 07/12/21 09:47
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/m3 ND 0.40 07/12/21 09:47
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/m3 ND 1.2 07/12/21 09:47
Cyclohexane ug/m3 ND 0.88 07/12/21 09:47
Dibromochloromethane ug/m3 ND 0.86 07/12/21 09:47
Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/m3 ND 0.50 07/12/21 09:47
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane ug/m3 ND 0.71 07/12/21 09:47
Ethanol ug/m3 ND 0.96 07/12/21 09:47
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/14/2021 06:17 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 12 of 20
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548079
PHOENIX RISING
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK:4028316
Associated Lab Samples:92548079001, 92548079002, 92548079003, 92548079004
Matrix:Air
Analyzed
Ethyl acetate ug/m3 ND 0.37 07/12/21 09:47
Ethylbenzene ug/m3 ND 0.44 07/12/21 09:47
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/m3 ND 2.7 07/12/21 09:47
m&p-Xylene ug/m3 ND 0.88 07/12/21 09:47
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/m3 ND 1.8 07/12/21 09:47
Methylene Chloride ug/m3 ND 1.8 07/12/21 09:47
n-Heptane ug/m3 ND 0.42 07/12/21 09:47
n-Hexane ug/m3 ND 0.36 07/12/21 09:47
Naphthalene ug/m3 ND 1.3 07/12/21 09:47
o-Xylene ug/m3 ND 0.44 07/12/21 09:47
Propylene ug/m3 ND 0.44 07/12/21 09:47
Styrene ug/m3 ND 0.43 07/12/21 09:47
Tetrachloroethene ug/m3 ND 0.34 07/12/21 09:47
Tetrahydrofuran ug/m3 ND 0.30 07/12/21 09:47
Toluene ug/m3 ND 0.38 07/12/21 09:47
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/m3 ND 0.40 07/12/21 09:47
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/m3 ND 1.2 07/12/21 09:47
Trichloroethene ug/m3 ND 0.27 07/12/21 09:47
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/m3 ND 0.57 07/12/21 09:47
Vinyl acetate ug/m3 ND 0.36 07/12/21 09:47
Vinyl chloride ug/m3 ND 0.13 07/12/21 09:47
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
4028317LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/m3 57.759.3 97 70-130
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/m3 77.175.4 102 70-132
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/m3 61.859.6 104 70-134
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane ug/m3 84.283.6 101 70-130
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/m3 46.943.9 107 70-133
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/m3 39.643.5 91 70-130
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/m3 192177 108 69-132
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/m3 53.454 99 70-142
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/m3 87.882.5 106 70-138
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 63.666.2 96 70-146
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/m3 46.244.4 104 70-132
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/m3 53.150.6 105 70-134
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/m3 53.353.7 99 70-143
1,3-Butadiene ug/m3 23.524.2 97 70-136
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 65.766.3 99 70-145
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 66.666.3 100 70-140
2-Butanone (MEK)ug/m3 31.932.3 99 50-139
2-Hexanone ug/m3 55.844.8 125 70-148
2-Propanol ug/m3 150149 101 67-135
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/14/2021 06:17 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 13 of 20
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548079
PHOENIX RISING
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
4028317LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
4-Ethyltoluene ug/m3 54.853.7 102 70-145
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ug/m3 53.744.9 120 70-139
Acetone ug/m3 125128 98 64-130
Benzene ug/m3 40.034.8 115 70-131
Benzyl chloride ug/m3 55.357.6 96 70-130
Bromodichloromethane ug/m3 74.273.1 102 70-133
Bromoform ug/m3 121114 106 70-137
Bromomethane ug/m3 41.442.5 97 64-134
Carbon disulfide ug/m3 38.034.4 110 70-131
Carbon tetrachloride ug/m3 68.669.4 99 70-131
Chlorobenzene ug/m3 50.850.2 101 70-130
Chloroethane ug/m3 27.528.8 95 69-141
Chloroform ug/m3 58.152.4 111 70-130
Chloromethane ug/m3 21.922.6 97 70-130
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/m3 45.743.4 105 70-137
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/m3 57.449.4 116 70-144
Cyclohexane ug/m3 45.737.4 122 70-137
Dibromochloromethane ug/m3 10293.2 109 70-132
Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/m3 53.954.6 99 70-130
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane ug/m3 68.571.2 96 70-130
Ethanol ug/m3 130124 105 63-133
Ethyl acetate ug/m3 41.338.9 106 70-136
Ethylbenzene ug/m3 50.447.8 105 70-142
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/m3 145133 109 70-135
m&p-Xylene ug/m3 10095.4 105 70-141
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/m3 43.939.6 111 70-143
Methylene Chloride ug/m3 193190 101 70-130
n-Heptane ug/m3 50.444.6 113 70-137
n-Hexane ug/m3 39.338 103 70-135
Naphthalene ug/m3 66.265.2 101 67-132
o-Xylene ug/m3 49.447.6 104 70-141
Propylene ug/m3 20.718.9 110 70-130
Styrene ug/m3 48.347 103 70-142
Tetrachloroethene ug/m3 72.473.4 99 70-130
Tetrahydrofuran ug/m3 36.132.1 112 70-136
Toluene ug/m3 49.241.6 118 70-138
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/m3 46.643.6 107 70-130
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/m3 63.050.5 125 70-145
Trichloroethene ug/m3 60.458.4 103 70-130
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/m3 52.062 84 69-135
Vinyl acetate ug/m3 50.846.4 110 70-146
Vinyl chloride ug/m3 29.528 105 70-137
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/14/2021 06:17 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 14 of 20
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548079
PHOENIX RISING
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
Dup
Result QualifiersRPDResult
10568732001
4029321SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/m3 NDND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/m3 NDND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/m3 NDND
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane ug/m3 .94JND
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/m3 NDND
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/m3 NDND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/m3 NDND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/m3 1.3JND
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/m3 NDND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 NDND
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/m3 NDND
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/m3 NDND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/m3 .88JND
1,3-Butadiene ug/m3 NDND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 1.1JND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 6.1 16.0
2-Butanone (MEK)ug/m3 5.9 36.1
2-Hexanone ug/m3 NDND
2-Propanol ug/m3 20.3 120.6
4-Ethyltoluene ug/m3 NDND
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ug/m3 .9JND
Acetone ug/m3 42.8 740.0
Benzene ug/m3 .35JND
Benzyl chloride ug/m3 NDND
Bromodichloromethane ug/m3 NDND
Bromoform ug/m3 NDND
Bromomethane ug/m3 NDND
Carbon disulfide ug/m3 .22JND
Carbon tetrachloride ug/m3 NDND
Chlorobenzene ug/m3 NDND
Chloroethane ug/m3 NDND
Chloroform ug/m3 NDND
Chloromethane ug/m3 0.86 90.94
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/m3 NDND
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/m3 NDND
Cyclohexane ug/m3 .91JND
Dibromochloromethane ug/m3 NDND
Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/m3 2.5 112.8
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane ug/m3 NDND
Ethanol ug/m3 151 2148
Ethyl acetate ug/m3 2.4 12.3
Ethylbenzene ug/m3 .89JND
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/m3 NDND
m&p-Xylene ug/m3 2.6JND
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/m3 NDND
Methylene Chloride ug/m3 NDND
n-Heptane ug/m3 1.6 51.6
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/14/2021 06:17 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 15 of 20
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548079
PHOENIX RISING
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
Dup
Result QualifiersRPDResult
10568732001
4029321SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
n-Hexane ug/m3 1.4 81.3
Naphthalene ug/m3 NDND
o-Xylene ug/m3 .96JND
Propylene ug/m3 NDND
Styrene ug/m3 .86JND
Tetrachloroethene ug/m3 NDND
Tetrahydrofuran ug/m3 1.3 21.3
Toluene ug/m3 3.5 13.5
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/m3 3.4 23.5
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/m3 NDND
Trichloroethene ug/m3 NDND
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/m3 16.8 016.8
Vinyl acetate ug/m3 NDND
Vinyl chloride ug/m3 NDND
Parameter Units
Dup
Result QualifiersRPDResult
10568732002
4029322SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/m3 NDND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/m3 NDND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/m3 NDND
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane ug/m3 .77JND
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/m3 NDND
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/m3 NDND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/m3 NDND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/m3 1.3JND
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/m3 NDND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 NDND
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/m3 NDND
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/m3 NDND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/m3 .89JND
1,3-Butadiene ug/m3 NDND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 NDND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 6.4 85.9
2-Butanone (MEK)ug/m3 3.4JND
2-Hexanone ug/m3 NDND
2-Propanol ug/m3 2.3JND
4-Ethyltoluene ug/m3 NDND
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ug/m3 NDND
Acetone ug/m3 25.5 226.0
Benzene ug/m3 .42JND
Benzyl chloride ug/m3 NDND
Bromodichloromethane ug/m3 NDND
Bromoform ug/m3 NDND
Bromomethane ug/m3 NDND
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/14/2021 06:17 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 16 of 20
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548079
PHOENIX RISING
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
Dup
Result QualifiersRPDResult
10568732002
4029322SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Carbon disulfide ug/m3 NDND
Carbon tetrachloride ug/m3 NDND
Chlorobenzene ug/m3 NDND
Chloroethane ug/m3 NDND
Chloroform ug/m3 NDND
Chloromethane ug/m3 0.97 110.87
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/m3 NDND
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/m3 NDND
Cyclohexane ug/m3 .89JND
Dibromochloromethane ug/m3 NDND
Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/m3 2.8 142.5
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane ug/m3 NDND
Ethanol ug/m3 86.9 1872.2
Ethyl acetate ug/m3 .32JND
Ethylbenzene ug/m3 .88JND
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/m3 NDND
m&p-Xylene ug/m3 2.5JND
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/m3 NDND
Methylene Chloride ug/m3 NDND
n-Heptane ug/m3 1.5 41.6
n-Hexane ug/m3 1.1J1.4
Naphthalene ug/m3 NDND
o-Xylene ug/m3 .91JND
Propylene ug/m3 NDND
Styrene ug/m3 NDND
Tetrachloroethene ug/m3 NDND
Tetrahydrofuran ug/m3 .8JND
Toluene ug/m3 2.1 12.1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/m3 NDND
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/m3 NDND
Trichloroethene ug/m3 NDND
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/m3 16.9 117.1
Vinyl acetate ug/m3 NDND
Vinyl chloride ug/m3 NDND
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/14/2021 06:17 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 17 of 20
#=QL#
QUALIFIERS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548079
PHOENIX RISING
DEFINITIONS
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to dilution of the sample aliquot.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
TNTC - Too Numerous To Count
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL - Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit.
RL - Reporting Limit - The lowest concentration value that meets project requirements for quantitative data with known precision and
bias for a specific analyte in a specific matrix.
S - Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine decomposes to and cannot be separated from Azobenzene using Method 8270. The result for each analyte is
a combined concentration.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
SG - Silica Gel - Clean-Up
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2 Chloroethylvinyl ether.
A separate vial preserved to a pH of 4-5 is recommended in SW846 Chapter 4 for the analysis of Acrolein and Acrylonitrile by EPAMethod 8260.
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
TNI - The NELAC Institute.
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
Result may be biased high due to carryover from previously analyzed sample.C8
The reporting limit has been raised in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 4740.2100 Subpart 8. C, D. Reporting Limit
Evaluation Rule.MN
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/14/2021 06:17 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 18 of 20
#=CR#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92548079
PHOENIX RISING
Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method QC Batch Analytical Method
Analytical
Batch
92548079001 755496SG-1 TO-15
92548079002 755496SG-2 TO-15
92548079003 755496SG-3 TO-15
92548079004 755496SG-4 TO-15
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 07/14/2021 06:17 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 19 of 20
Page 20 of 20

ATTACHMENT F
NCDEQ RISK CALCULATOR OUTPUT
DEQ Risk Calculator - Vapor Intrusion - Resident Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Version Date: June 2021
Basis: May 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: SG-1
CAS # Chemical Name:
Soil Gas
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Calculated
Indoor Air
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Target Indoor
Air Conc. for
Carcinogens @
TCR = 1E-06
Target Indoor Air
Conc. for Non-
Carcinogens @
THQ = 0.2
Calculated
Carcinogenic
Risk
Calculated
Non-
Carcinogenic
Hazard
Quotient
67-64-1 Acetone 49.8 1.494 - 6.5E+03 4.6E-05
71-43-2 Benzene 43.4 1.302 3.6E-01 6.3E+00 3.6E-06 4.2E-02
75-15-0 Carbon Disulfide 117 3.51 - 1.5E+02 4.8E-03
74-87-3 Chloromethane 3.2 0.096 - 1.9E+01 1.0E-03
75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.8 0.084 - 2.1E+01 8.1E-04
78-87-5 Dichloropropane, 1,2- 4.5 0.135 7.6E-01 8.3E-01 1.8E-07 3.2E-02
100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 16.4 0.492 1.1E+00 2.1E+02 4.4E-07 4.7E-04
142-82-5 Heptane, N- 14.8 0.444 - 8.3E+01 1.1E-03
110-54-3 Hexane, N- 58.2 1.746 - 1.5E+02 2.4E-03
591-78-6 Hexanone, 2- 27.1 0.813 - 6.3E+00 2.6E-02
67-63-0 Isopropanol 7.6 0.228 - 4.2E+01 1.1E-03
78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 16.8 0.504 - 1.0E+03 9.7E-05
108-10-1 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone) 101 3.03 - 6.3E+02 9.7E-04
91-20-3 ~Naphthalene 7 0.21 8.3E-02 6.3E-01 2.5E-06 6.7E-02
115-07-1 Propylene 88.4 2.652 - 6.3E+02 8.5E-04
100-42-5 Styrene 2 0.06 - 2.1E+02 5.8E-05
127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 14.8 0.444 1.1E+01 8.3E+00 4.1E-08 1.1E-02
108-88-3 Toluene 1510 45.3 - 1.0E+03 8.7E-03
75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 6 0.18 - -
95-63-6 Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4- 28.2 0.846 - 1.3E+01 1.4E-02
108-67-8 Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5- 7.8 0.234 - 1.3E+01 3.7E-03
106-42-3 Xylene, P- 51.8 1.554 - 2.1E+01 1.5E-02
108-38-3 Xylene, m- 51.8 1.554 - 2.1E+01 1.5E-02
95-47-6 Xylene, o- 22 0.66 - 2.1E+01 6.3E-03
Cumulative: 6.8E-06 2.5E-01
All concentrations are in ug/m3
Output Form 3B
Carcinogenic risk and hazard quotient cells highlighted in orange are associated with non-volatile chemicals. Since these chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion
risk, no risk values are calculated for these chemicals.
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
DEQ Risk Calculator - Vapor Intrusion - Resident Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Version Date: June 2021
Basis: May 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: SG-2
CAS # Chemical Name:
Soil Gas
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Calculated
Indoor Air
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Target Indoor
Air Conc. for
Carcinogens @
TCR = 1E-06
Target Indoor Air
Conc. for Non-
Carcinogens @
THQ = 0.2
Calculated
Carcinogenic
Risk
Calculated
Non-
Carcinogenic
Hazard
Quotient
67-64-1 Acetone 53.6 1.608 - 6.5E+03 5.0E-05
71-43-2 Benzene 55.9 1.677 3.6E-01 6.3E+00 4.7E-06 5.4E-02
75-15-0 Carbon Disulfide 55.4 1.662 - 1.5E+02 2.3E-03
74-87-3 Chloromethane 1.8 0.054 - 1.9E+01 5.8E-04
75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.8 0.084 - 2.1E+01 8.1E-04
78-87-5 Dichloropropane, 1,2- 5.5 0.165 7.6E-01 8.3E-01 2.2E-07 4.0E-02
100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 17.4 0.522 1.1E+00 2.1E+02 4.6E-07 5.0E-04
142-82-5 Heptane, N- 10.4 0.312 - 8.3E+01 7.5E-04
110-54-3 Hexane, N- 18.1 0.543 - 1.5E+02 7.4E-04
591-78-6 Hexanone, 2- 25.8 0.774 - 6.3E+00 2.5E-02
78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 17.4 0.522 - 1.0E+03 1.0E-04
108-10-1 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone) 82.2 2.466 - 6.3E+02 7.9E-04
91-20-3 ~Naphthalene 7.5 0.225 8.3E-02 6.3E-01 2.7E-06 7.2E-02
115-07-1 Propylene 37.6 1.128 - 6.3E+02 3.6E-04
100-42-5 Styrene 2.1 0.063 - 2.1E+02 6.0E-05
127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 105 3.15 1.1E+01 8.3E+00 2.9E-07 7.6E-02
108-88-3 Toluene 4360 130.8 - 1.0E+03 2.5E-02
76-13-1 Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane, 1,1,2- 3.2 0.096 - 1.0E+03 1.8E-05
75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 9.2 0.276 - -
95-63-6 Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4- 21.6 0.648 - 1.3E+01 1.0E-02
108-67-8 Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5- 6.3 0.189 - 1.3E+01 3.0E-03
106-42-3 Xylene, P- 44.3 1.329 - 2.1E+01 1.3E-02
108-38-3 Xylene, m- 44.3 1.329 - 2.1E+01 1.3E-02
95-47-6 Xylene, o- 18.6 0.558 - 2.1E+01 5.4E-03
Cumulative: 8.4E-06 3.4E-01
All concentrations are in ug/m3
Output Form 3B
Carcinogenic risk and hazard quotient cells highlighted in orange are associated with non-volatile chemicals. Since these chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion
risk, no risk values are calculated for these chemicals.
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
DEQ Risk Calculator - Vapor Intrusion - Resident Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Version Date: June 2021
Basis: May 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: SG-3
CAS # Chemical Name:
Soil Gas
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Calculated
Indoor Air
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Target Indoor
Air Conc. for
Carcinogens @
TCR = 1E-06
Target Indoor Air
Conc. for Non-
Carcinogens @
THQ = 0.2
Calculated
Carcinogenic
Risk
Calculated
Non-
Carcinogenic
Hazard
Quotient
67-64-1 Acetone 78.3 2.349 - 6.5E+03 7.3E-05
71-43-2 Benzene 48.3 1.449 3.6E-01 6.3E+00 4.0E-06 4.6E-02
75-15-0 Carbon Disulfide 49.4 1.482 - 1.5E+02 2.0E-03
74-87-3 Chloromethane 21.9 0.657 - 1.9E+01 7.0E-03
75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.9 0.087 - 2.1E+01 8.3E-04
78-87-5 Dichloropropane, 1,2- 3.8 0.114 7.6E-01 8.3E-01 1.5E-07 2.7E-02
75-00-3 Ethyl Chloride (Chloroethane) 4.3 0.129 - 2.1E+03 1.2E-05
100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 17.9 0.537 1.1E+00 2.1E+02 4.8E-07 5.1E-04
142-82-5 Heptane, N- 15.9 0.477 - 8.3E+01 1.1E-03
110-54-3 Hexane, N- 31.8 0.954 - 1.5E+02 1.3E-03
591-78-6 Hexanone, 2- 28.8 0.864 - 6.3E+00 2.8E-02
78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 27.3 0.819 - 1.0E+03 1.6E-04
108-10-1 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone) 82.4 2.472 - 6.3E+02 7.9E-04
91-20-3 ~Naphthalene 7.4 0.222 8.3E-02 6.3E-01 2.7E-06 7.1E-02
115-07-1 Propylene 626 18.78 - 6.3E+02 6.0E-03
100-42-5 Styrene 4.4 0.132 - 2.1E+02 1.3E-04
127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 7.5 0.225 1.1E+01 8.3E+00 2.1E-08 5.4E-03
108-88-3 Toluene 1580 47.4 - 1.0E+03 9.1E-03
76-13-1 Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane, 1,1,2- 3.4 0.102 - 1.0E+03 2.0E-05
75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 7.8 0.234 - -
95-63-6 Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4- 28.4 0.852 - 1.3E+01 1.4E-02
108-67-8 Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5- 7.4 0.222 - 1.3E+01 3.5E-03
75-01-4 Vinyl Chloride 2.7 0.081 1.7E-01 2.1E+01 4.8E-07 7.8E-04
106-42-3 Xylene, P- 54.9 1.647 - 2.1E+01 1.6E-02
108-38-3 Xylene, m- 54.9 1.647 - 2.1E+01 1.6E-02
95-47-6 Xylene, o- 23 0.69 - 2.1E+01 6.6E-03
Cumulative: 7.8E-06 2.6E-01
All concentrations are in ug/m3
Output Form 3B
Carcinogenic risk and hazard quotient cells highlighted in orange are associated with non-volatile chemicals. Since these chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion
risk, no risk values are calculated for these chemicals.
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
DEQ Risk Calculator - Vapor Intrusion - Resident Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Version Date: June 2021
Basis: May 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: SG-4
CAS # Chemical Name:
Soil Gas
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Calculated
Indoor Air
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Target Indoor
Air Conc. for
Carcinogens @
TCR = 1E-06
Target Indoor Air
Conc. for Non-
Carcinogens @
THQ = 0.2
Calculated
Carcinogenic
Risk
Calculated
Non-
Carcinogenic
Hazard
Quotient
67-64-1 Acetone 60.2 1.806 - 6.5E+03 5.6E-05
71-43-2 Benzene 44.6 1.338 3.6E-01 6.3E+00 3.7E-06 4.3E-02
75-15-0 Carbon Disulfide 28.8 0.864 - 1.5E+02 1.2E-03
74-87-3 Chloromethane 11 0.33 - 1.9E+01 3.5E-03
75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.7 0.081 - 2.1E+01 7.8E-04
78-87-5 Dichloropropane, 1,2- 2.5 0.075 7.6E-01 8.3E-01 9.9E-08 1.8E-02
75-00-3 Ethyl Chloride (Chloroethane) 2.4 0.072 - 2.1E+03 6.9E-06
100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 12.4 0.372 1.1E+00 2.1E+02 3.3E-07 3.6E-04
142-82-5 Heptane, N- 16.3 0.489 - 8.3E+01 1.2E-03
110-54-3 Hexane, N- 35.9 1.077 - 1.5E+02 1.5E-03
78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 9.6 0.288 - 1.0E+03 5.5E-05
108-10-1 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone) 42.9 1.287 - 6.3E+02 4.1E-04
91-20-3 ~Naphthalene 5.5 0.165 8.3E-02 6.3E-01 2.0E-06 5.3E-02
115-07-1 Propylene 1100 33 - 6.3E+02 1.1E-02
100-42-5 Styrene 4.7 0.141 - 2.1E+02 1.4E-04
127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 9.2 0.276 1.1E+01 8.3E+00 2.6E-08 6.6E-03
108-88-3 Toluene 1930 57.9 - 1.0E+03 1.1E-02
75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 3.4 0.102 - -
95-63-6 Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4- 17.8 0.534 - 1.3E+01 8.5E-03
108-67-8 Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5- 5.1 0.153 - 1.3E+01 2.4E-03
75-01-4 Vinyl Chloride 3.6 0.108 1.7E-01 2.1E+01 6.4E-07 1.0E-03
106-42-3 Xylene, P- 35.5 1.065 - 2.1E+01 1.0E-02
108-38-3 Xylene, m- 35.5 1.065 - 2.1E+01 1.0E-02
95-47-6 Xylene, o- 15.3 0.459 - 2.1E+01 4.4E-03
Cumulative: 6.8E-06 1.9E-01
All concentrations are in ug/m3
Output Form 3B
Carcinogenic risk and hazard quotient cells highlighted in orange are associated with non-volatile chemicals. Since these chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion
risk, no risk values are calculated for these chemicals.
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
DEQ Risk Calculator - Vapor Intrusion - Resident Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Version Date: June 2021
Basis: May 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: Soil Gas (Maximum Concentrations)
CAS # Chemical Name:
Soil Gas
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Calculated
Indoor Air
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Target Indoor
Air Conc. for
Carcinogens @
TCR = 1E-06
Target Indoor Air
Conc. for Non-
Carcinogens @
THQ = 0.2
Calculated
Carcinogenic
Risk
Calculated
Non-
Carcinogenic
Hazard
Quotient
67-64-1 Acetone 78.3 2.349 - 6.5E+03 7.3E-05
71-43-2 Benzene 55.9 1.677 3.6E-01 6.3E+00 4.7E-06 5.4E-02
75-15-0 Carbon Disulfide 117 3.51 - 1.5E+02 4.8E-03
74-87-3 Chloromethane 21.9 0.657 - 1.9E+01 7.0E-03
75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.9 0.087 - 2.1E+01 8.3E-04
78-87-5 Dichloropropane, 1,2- 5.5 0.165 7.6E-01 8.3E-01 2.2E-07 4.0E-02
75-00-3 Ethyl Chloride (Chloroethane) 4.3 0.129 - 2.1E+03 1.2E-05
100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 17.9 0.537 1.1E+00 2.1E+02 4.8E-07 5.1E-04
142-82-5 Heptane, N- 16.3 0.489 - 8.3E+01 1.2E-03
110-54-3 Hexane, N- 58.2 1.746 - 1.5E+02 2.4E-03
591-78-6 Hexanone, 2- 28.8 0.864 - 6.3E+00 2.8E-02
67-63-0 Isopropanol 7.6 0.228 - 4.2E+01 1.1E-03
78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 27.3 0.819 - 1.0E+03 1.6E-04
108-10-1 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone) 101 3.03 - 6.3E+02 9.7E-04
91-20-3 ~Naphthalene 7.5 0.225 8.3E-02 6.3E-01 2.7E-06 7.2E-02
115-07-1 Propylene 1100 33 - 6.3E+02 1.1E-02
100-42-5 Styrene 4.7 0.141 - 2.1E+02 1.4E-04
127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 105 3.15 1.1E+01 8.3E+00 2.9E-07 7.6E-02
108-88-3 Toluene 4360 130.8 - 1.0E+03 2.5E-02
76-13-1 Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane, 1,1,2- 3.4 0.102 - 1.0E+03 2.0E-05
75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 9.2 0.276 - -
95-63-6 Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4- 28.4 0.852 - 1.3E+01 1.4E-02
108-67-8 Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5- 7.8 0.234 - 1.3E+01 3.7E-03
75-01-4 Vinyl Chloride 3.6 0.108 1.7E-01 2.1E+01 6.4E-07 1.0E-03
106-42-3 Xylene, P- 54.9 1.647 - 2.1E+01 1.6E-02
108-38-3 Xylene, m- 54.9 1.647 - 2.1E+01 1.6E-02
95-47-6 Xylene, o- 23 0.69 - 2.1E+01 6.6E-03
Cumulative: 9.0E-06 3.8E-01
All concentrations are in ug/m3
Output Form 3B
Carcinogenic risk and hazard quotient cells highlighted in orange are associated with non-volatile chemicals. Since these chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion
risk, no risk values are calculated for these chemicals.
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator

REFERENCE 22
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Basic Elements of Ground-Water Hydrology
With Reference to Conditions in North Carolina
By Ralph C Heath
U.S. Geological Survey
Water-Resources Investigations
Open-File Report 80-44
Prepared in cooperation with the
North Carolina Department of Natural^
Resources and Community Development
Raleigh, North Carolina
1980
United States Department of the Interior
CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
H. W. Menard, Director
For Additional Information Write to:
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Post Office Box 2857
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Copies of this report may be purchased from:
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Open-File Services Section
Branch of Distribution
Box 25425, Federal Center
Denver, Colorado 80225
Preface
Ground water is one of North Carolina's
most valuable natural resources. It is the
primary source-of water supplies in rural areas
and is also widely used by industries and
municipalities, especially in the Coastal Plain.
However, its use is not increasing in proportion
to the growth of the State's population and
economy. Instead, the present emphasis in
water-supply development is on large regional
systems based on reservoirs on large streams.
The value of ground water as a resource not
only depends on its widespread occurrence
but also on its generally excellent chemical
quality. Thus, in most cases, ground-water
does not require treatment prior to use, except
as a precaution against unsuspected pollution.
However, in an effort to control stream
pollution, greater and greater emphasis is
being placed on the land disposal of liquid and
solid wastes. One result of this may be
increasingly widespread deterioration of
ground-water quality.
The development of ground-water supplies
and the protection of ground-water quality
requires knowledge of the occurrence of
ground water and knowledge of how ground-
water systems function. The lack of such
knowledge among those involved in the
development, management, and regulation of
water supplies has been an important element
in the avoidance of ground water as a source of
large supplies and in the increasing occur-
rence of ground-water pollution.
This report was prepared as an aid to
developing a better understanding of the
ground-water resources of the State. It
consists of 46 essays grouped into five parts.
The topics covered by these essays range from
the most basic aspects of ground-water
hydrology to the identification and correction
of problems that affect the operation of supply
wells. The essays were designed both for self
study and for use in workshops on ground-
water hydrology and on the development and
operation of ground-water supplies.
Relative to the use of this report in
workshops, selected essays have been used in
workshops for the staff of the North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Com-
munity Development and in short courses for
operators of water systems that utilize wells as
a source of supply. The essays used in each
workshop and short course were selected on
the basis of the background and needs of the
group.
Finally, most of the essays contain sketches
that illustrate the main points covered in the
text. However, to facilitate the rearrangement
of essays for use in different workshops, they
are not numbered and titled as in most
technical reports. For those who find this
disconcerting, I suggest that the text of each
essay simply be viewed as an expanded
explanation of the sketches.
Ralph C. Heath
Definitions of Terms
Aquifer (p. 7)1 A water-bearing bed that will yield water in a usable quantity.
Bedrock (p . 20) A collective term for the metamorphic and igneous rocks underlying the Piedmont
and mountains.
Capillary fringe (p . 5 ) The zone above the water table in which water is held by surface tension. Water
in the capillary fringe is under a pressure less than atmospheric.
Conductivity, hydraulic (p. 12 ) The capacity of a unit cube of rock to transmit water.
Cone of depression (p. 49) The depression of heads around a pumping well caused by the withdrawal
of water.
Confining bed (p.7 ) A layer of rock that hampers the movement of water.
Dispersion (p. 40) The extent to which a substance injected into an aquifer spreads as it moves
through the aquifer.
Drawdown (p. 52) The reduction in head at a point caused by the withdrawal of water from an aquifer.
Equipotential line (p. 42 ) A line (on a map) or cross section along which total heads are the same.
Flow line (p. 42 ) The idealized path followed by particles of water.
Flow net (p. 42 ) The grid pattern formed by a network of flow lines and equipotential lines.
Formation (p. 22) A distinct rock layer named for a locality near which it occurs.
Gradient, hydraulic (p. 10) Change in head per unit of distance measured in the direction of the
steepest change.
Head, total (p. 10) The height above a datum plane of the surface of a column of water. It is composed
in a ground-water system of elevation head and pressure head.
Porosity (p. 9 ) The openings in a rock. ~
Saprolite (p. 20) The soil-like rock that occurs between land surface and bedrock in the Piedmont and
mountains.
Specific retention (p. 9 ) The volume of water retained in a rock after gravity drainage.
Specific yield (p. 9 ) The volume of water that will drain under the influence of gravity from a
saturated rock.
Storage coefficient (p. 33) The volume of water released from storage in a unit prism of an aquifer
when the head is lowered a unit distance.
Stratification (p. 36) The layered structure of sedimentary rocks.
Transmisslvity (p. 37) The capacity of an aquifer to transmit water. It equals the hydraulic
conductivity times the aquifer thickness.
Water table (p. 5 ) The level in the zone of saturation at which the pressure is equal to the
atmospheric pressure.
Zone, saturated (p. 5 ) Subsurface zone in which all interconnected openings are full of water.
Zone, unsaturated (p. 5 ) Subsurface zone, usually starting at the land surface, that contains both
water and air.
1 Page numbers refer to page on which the term is discussed.
IV
Contents
Page
Preface ............................................................................... m
Definition of terms .................................................................... iv
Part I. INTRODUCTION TO GROUND-WATER HYDROLOGY ........................... j.
Ground water as a resource in North Carolina ..................................... 3
Rocks and water ................................................................. ~~4
Underground water .............................................................. 5
Hydrologic cycle ................................................................. e
Aquifers and confining beds ...................................................... 7
Porosity of soils and rocks ....................................................... ~a
Specific yield and specific retention ............................................... 9
Heads and gradients ............................................................. 10
Hydraulic conductivity ........................................................... 12
Functions of ground-water systems ............................................... 14
Part II. GROUND-WATER GEOLOGY OF NORTH CAROLINA .......................... 17
Physical setting of the ground-water system ....................................... 18
Water-bearing rocks .............................................................. 20
Rock units and aquifers in the Coastal Plain ....................................... 22
Ground-water situation in the Coastal Plain ....................................... 24
Rock units and aquifers in the Piedmont and mountains .......................... 2e
Ground-water situation in the Piedmont and mountains ............................ 2?
Hydraulic characteristics of the Piedmont and
mountain ground-water system ............................................... 28
Selecting well sites in the Piedmont and mountains .............................'... 30
Part III. BASIC HYDRAULIC CONCEPTS AND METHODS .............................. 33
Capillarity and unsaturated flow .................................................. 34
Stratification and unsaturated flow ................................................ 36
Transmissivity ................................................................... 37
Storage coefficient ............................................................... 33
Ground-water flow and dispersion ................................................ 40
Ground-water movement and topography ......................................... 41
Ground-water flow nets .......................................................... 42
Ground-water movement and stratification ........................................ 44
Ground-water velocity ............................................................ 46
The cone of depression .......................................................... 49
The source of water derived from wells ............................................ so
Aquifer tests ..................................................................... 52
Analysis of aquifer-test data ...................................................... 54
Time-drawdown analysis ......................................................... 56
Distance - drawdown analysis .................................................... 58
Part IV. BASIC ASPECTS OF GROUND-WATER DEVELOPMENT ....................... 59
Well-construction methods ....................................................... eo
Well logs ........................................................................ ea
Water-well design ................................................................ 64
Well-acceptance tests ............................................................ ee
Well interference ................................................................. 68
Aquifer boundaries ............................................................... ?o
Salt-water encroachment ......................................................... 72
Well-field design ................................................................. 74
Part V. OPERATION OF GROUND-WATER SUPPLIES .................................. 77
Measurements of water levels and pumping rates ................................... 78
Supply-well problems — decline in yield ........................................... so
Protection of supply wells ......................................................... ea
Supply-well problems — changes in water quality .................................. 84
Well records and files ............................................................. ae
International system units ........................................... Inside back cover
Relation of units of hydraulic conductivity
and transmissivity ............................................... Inside back cover
Acknowledgments
Technical review: M. D. Winner and D. G. Jordan
Editorial review: H. S. Revel
Drafting: John Teel
Typing: Mamie C. Hodge and Janet McBride
Cover Photograph
. Servicing a continuous water-level recorder on an
observation well operated by the U.S. Geological Survey
in the Cape Hatteras National Seashore.
(Photograph by Ralph C. Heath, U.S. Geological Survey)
VI
PART I.
INTRODUCTION TO
GROUND-WATER
HYDROLOGY
"... all concerned recognize that the quality that the ... wells ... will be retained and
of water from the ... River is normally far used as the backup supply ... when the
superior to that of the wells ..." chloride concentration in the River becomes
..,, i, .* f *u to° hiQh -••" However, all concerned are aware of the
fact that there are times When the river Will -Excerpts from a letter regarding a change in the
be unsuitable as a source Of potable water. source of a municipal supply from wells to a stream.
To provide for such situations, it was agreed
Ground Water As A
Resource in North Carolina
1 1
11
n
n
n
n
/
\i
i
i i•"•
i1
t
n IT-\ •
m mm
,0^
f-
11 1
111
n
*»*»
m m n i in
in
m
11 n n
*** <$
sS* sf* *** ',/*»/>,c " r^ J/7/">" r ^(vv. ""*•
/^x FTTI /w ^^ —\ A ^^-n ^->
'/pf \V^<^ iii in
Y »^i
M/\//
w&%® III
Y^ V w- \^i^^^\^y \(/ y\/lterLt\//
In 1975, North Carolina had 224 municipal
water systems serving 500 or more customers.
Of these systems, 102 obtained a part or all of
their water from wells. These systems serve
more than 500,000 people with 70 Mgal/day
(million gallons per day) of water. These
figures show the importance of ground water in
North Carolina as a source of municipal
supplies. They do not, however, show the
overall importance of ground water.
In addition to the people served ground
water through municipal systems, more than
2,400,000 people living in rural areas (of a total
State population of more than 5,000,000)
obtain their water supplies from wells and
springs. Ground water is also an important
source of water for industries and agriculture.
The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that
540 Mgal/day of ground water were being used
in North Carolina in 1975. Most of this use is in
the Coastal Plain region where ground water is
obtained from extensive and productive sand
and or limestone aquifers. Although the
aquifers underlying the Piedmont and moun-
tains are much less productive than those in
the Coastal Plain, ground water is an important
source of supply for small cities and industries
and is the primary source for rural homes and
farms.
Rocks and Water
PRIMARY OPENINGS
WELL-SORTED SAND POORLY-SORTED SAND
POROUS MATERIAL
SECONDARY OPENINGS
FRACTURED ROCK
FRACTURES IN
GRANITE
CAVERNS IN
LIMESTONE
Most of the rocks near the Earth's surface are
composed of both solids and holes. The solid
part is, of course, much more obvious than the
holes, but without the holes there would be no
underground water to supply wells and
springs.
There are different kinds of holes in rocks
and it is sometimes useful to be aware of these.
If the holes were formed at the same time as the
rock, they are referred to as primary openings.
The pores in sand and gravel are primary
openings. The sand aquifers underlying the
Coastal Plain contain water in primary
openings.
If the holes were formed after the rock was
formed, they are referred to as secondary
openings. The fractures in granite and other
igneous and metamorphic rocks are secondary
openings. Caverns in limestone, which are
formed as ground water slowly dissolves the
rock, are an especially important type of
secondary opening. Ground water in the
bedrock underlying the Piedmont and moun-
tains occurs in secondary openings, as
does much of that in the limestones underlying
the Coastal Plain.
Underground Water
Surface
water
LU
O
CC.
oc.
CO
O
IVI
CO
INTERMEDIATE ZONE
CAPILLARY (FRJNGE
JJ. L
Water table
GROUND WATER
All water beneath the land surface is referred
to as underground water. The equivalent term
for water on the land surface is surface water.
Underground water occurs in two different
zones. One zone, which occurs immediately
below the land surface in most areas, contains
both water and air and is referred to as the
unsaturated zone. The unsaturated zone is
almost invariably underlain by a zone in which
all interconnected openings are full of water.
This zone is referred to as the saturated zone.
Water in the saturated zone is the only
underground water that is available to supply
wells and springs and is the only water to which
the name ground water is correctly applied.
Recharge of the saturated zone occurs by
percolation of water from the land surface
through the unsaturated zone. The unsatura-
ted zone is, therefore, of great importance to
ground-water hydrology. This zone may be
divided usefully into three parts (or subzones);
(1) the soil zone, (2) the intermediate zone, and
(3) the capillary fringe.
The upper part - from the land surface to a
depth of several feet - is referred to as the so/7
zone. The soil zone is the zone that supports
plant growth. It is crisscrossed by living roots,
by holes left by decayed roots of earlier
vegetation, and by animal and worm burrows.
This zone tends to have a higher porosity and
to be more permeable than the underlying
material. The soil zone is underlain by the
intermediate zone, which differs in thickness
from place to place depending on the thickness
of the soil zone and the depth to the capillary
fringe.
Moving to the lowest part of the unsaturated
zone, the boundary between it and the
saturated zone is occupied by the capillary
fringe. The capillary fringe results from the
attraction between water and rocks. As a result
of this attraction, water clings as a film on the
surface of rock particles and rises up small-
diameter pores against the pull of gravity.
Water in the capillary fringe and in the
overlying part of the unsaturated zone is
under a negative hydraulic pressure - that is, it
is under a pressure less than atmospheric. The
water table is the level in the saturated zone at
which the hydraulic pressure is equal to
atmospheric pressure.
Hydrologic Cycle
The term hydrologic cycle is used to refer to
the constant movement of water above, on, and
below the Earth's surface. The concept of the
hydrologic cycle is central to an understanding
of the occurrence of water and the develop-
ment and management of water supplies.
Although the hydrologic cycle has neither a
beginning nor an end, it is convenient to
discuss its principal features by starting with
evaporation from vegetation, from exposed
surfaces including the land surface, and from
the ocean. This moisture forms clouds which,
under favorable conditions, return the water to
the land surface or oceans in the form of
precipitation.
Precipitation occurs in several forms,
including rain, snow, and hail, but we will
consider only rain in this discussion. The first
rain wets vegetation and other surfaces and
then begins to infiltrate into the ground.
Infiltration rates vary widely, depending on
land use, from possibly as much as an inch per
hour in mature forests to a tenth of an inch per
hour in silty soils under cultivation. When and if
the rate of precipitation exceeds the rate of
infiltration, overland flow occurs.
The first infiltration replaces soil moisture
and thereafter the excess percolates slowly
across the intermediate zone to the zone of
saturation. The water in the zone of saturation
moves downward and laterally to sites of
ground-water discharge such as springs on
hillsides or seeps in the bottoms of streams and
lakes or beneath the ocean.
Water reaching streams, both by overland
flow and from ground-water discharge, moves
to the sea where it is again evaporated to
perpetuate the cycle. •
Movement is, of course, the key element in
the concept of the hydrologic cycle. Some
"typical" rates of movement are shown in the
following table, along with the distribution of
the Earth's water supply.
Location
Rate of
movement
Distribution of
Earth'* water
supply (percent)
Atmosphere
Water on land surface
Water below the land surface
Ice caps and glaciers
Oceans
100s of miles per day
10s of miles per day
feet per day
feet per day
0.001
.02
.52
1.88
97.58
Aquifers and Confining Beds
Water-table
well Artesian well
,_.
5g
o 1^
URATED
JONE
t—
en
UNCONFINED
AQUIFER
CONFINING
BED
CONFINED
AQUIFER
" '.*•'•'•.'•••'••'.•'.*"•
:.:V.::.'/: ::••""•'••//.
••••;•• SAND ':'••'.'•'•
• ' . ',' • • •'.•'•'' .'•.-.••'•.'.•'•••• •
••.•:••'.•. ••'••• ••:.•.
S^fl^j
i i ii i i ii i ii i i i
-T — 'L IMESTONE| —
1 1 Il l l li i i
\ \ \ 1
7
POTENTIOMETRIC-)
SURFACE £
CAPILLARY-, FRINGE J
nn<fiim<mimi
Wuici Tuuic "^
Well screen
Well screen
or
open hole
I
s
L
\
t
c
u» at
<
i
J
i
«
3
M M
Q.
r
r
From the standpoint of ground-water
occurrence, all rocks underlying the Earth's
surface are classified either as aquifers or
confining beds. An aquifer is a rock unit that
will yield water in a usable quantity to a well or
spring. (In geological usage, "rock" includes
unconsolidated sediments.)
A confining bed is a rock unit that restricts
the movement of ground water either into or
out of adjacent aquifers.
Ground water occurs in aquifers under two
different conditions. Where water only partly
fills an aquifer, the upper surface of the
saturated zone is free to rise and decline. The
water in such aquifers is said to be unconfined
and the aquifers are referred to as unconfined
aquifers.
Where water completely fills an aquifer that
is overlain by a confining bed, the water in the
aquifer is said to be confined. Such aquifers are
referred to as confined aquifers.
Wells open to unconfined aquifers are
referred to as water-table wells. The water level
in these wells indicates the position of the
water table in the surrounding aquifer.
Wells drilled into .confined aquifers are
referred to as artesian wells. The water level in
artesian wells stands at some height above
the top of the aquifer but not necessarily above
the land surface.
The static water level in tightly cased wells
open to a confined aquifer stands at the level of
the potentiometric surface of the aquifer.
Porosity of Soils and Rocks
Vu =0.3 ft 3
Vt = 1.0 ft 3
Water — _-
o o o o o o o o oo ooooooooo
OOO° ° O O O Oo o Dry o o°°°sand °°° o o s u n u Q o
OOOOOOOOOOooooooooo
0 oooooooOo
ooo o o o o o o <
o o 6*0 ^ o o"o~
o * * ~ " '<>•• Saturated
|^~sand ^
O<3 O'p O Q"O O O
ooo "<» o a o Z!
• o o o ooo <a
oob "ooo o
Porosity (q
Volume of voids.( V» ) 0.3 ft 3
Total volume (Vt) 1.0 ft 3
= 0.30
The openings (holes) in a soil or rock are
referred to as its porosity. We express porosity
either as a decimal fraction or as a percent.
Thus
t
V
If we multiply the porosity determined with
equation 1 by 100, the result is porosity expres-
sed as a percent.
Soils are among the most porous of natural
materials because soil particles tend to form
loose clumps and because of the presence of
root holes and animal burrows.
where n = porosity, as a decimal fraction,
Vt = total volume of a soil or rock
sample
vs = volume of solids in the sample,
and
vv = volume of holes (voids).
Selected values of porosity
(Percent by volume)
Material Primary openings Secondary openings
Equal-size spheres (marbles)
Loosest packing ..........
Tighest packing ..........
Soil ..........................
Clay .........................
Sand ........................
Gravel .......................
Limestone (Castle Hayne) ....
Marble (mountains) ..........
Granite, gneiss, and schist ....
(Piedmont and mountains).
48
26
55
50
25
20
10 10
2
0.1
Specific Yield and
Specific Retention
S r =0.l ft3
O O Q o o o o e e e
o o o_p e e o o~b 0*000000_""<> Moist ~"° °
000 „„_ J — O • O
o
o o
sand
o_o o o o
O o o o e a
o"o e »~c
Water
Water retained as
a film on rock
surfaces and in
capillary- size
openings after
gravity drainage.
GRANULAR MATERIAL
S y =0.2 ft
Water
0.2ft 3 O.I ft 3n = Sv t S r - ——— -h ————= 0.30
y I ft 3 I ft 3
Porosity is important in ground-water hy-
drology because it tells us the maximum
amount of water a rock can contain when it is
saturated. However, it is equally important to
know that only a part of this water is available
to supply a well or a spring.
Hydro legists divide porosity into the part
that will drain under the influence of gravity
(called specific yield) and the part that is re-
tained as a film on rock surfaces and in very-
small openings (called specific retention). It
should be noted that the physical forces that
control specific retention are the same forces
involved in the thickness and moisture con-
tent of the capillary fringe.
Specific yield tells us how much water is
available for man's use and specific retention
tells us how much water remains in the rock
after it is drained.
FRACTURED ROCK
Thus
and s --d by vt
where by = specific yield,
Sr = specific retention,
V^ = volume of water that drains
from a total volume of Vt,
Vr = volume of water retained in a
total volume of Vt, and
vt = total volume of a soil or rock
sample.
Selected values of porosity, specific yield, and specific retention
(Percent by volume)
Material Porotlty Specific yield Specific retention
Soil .............................
Clay .............................
Sand ............................
Gravel ...........................
Limestone (Castle Hayne) ........
Marble ...........................
Granite, gneiss, and schist .........
55
50
25
20
20
2
0.1
40
2
22
19
18
1.8
0.09
15
48
3
1
2
0.2
0.01
Heads and Gradients
Measuring point ( top of casing )
Well I x*(Alt I0° ft) (Alt 98ft'|Well 2
L/CJJto
wat
ude of measuring point -
1x///r /r / +- / s
>th
er
t
3
J
»
J
•>
/7
»*•in
t
r uisiunce ILH /uu \\\ ———— ^M Land surface
i
TV
~~ Head loss(ht) <~™~ T-m_ _L^ __
•a
o o>JC
« UNCONFINED AQUIFER
£ Well
Jl
>«—
00
}Water table^
Ground-
water
movement
"S Bottom of aquifer — •>. 01
« (National Geodetic
uj Datum plane Vertical Datum of 1929)
In many ground-water investigations it is
either necessary or desirable to know the depth
to the water table and the direction and rate
of ground-water movement. Both of these
require the measurement of the position of the
water level in wells.
The first step is to identify (and describe) a
fixed point - measuring point (MP) - that all
measurements will be referred to. The depth
to the water level below the measuring point
can be measured by any of several means.
(See MEASUREMENTS OF WATER LEVELS
AND PUMPING RATES.) In order to deter-
mine the direction and rate of ground-water
movement, it is necessary to measure the
depth to water (D to W) in at least three wells
and to determine the altitude of their measur-
ing points with respect to a common datum
plane - usually mean sea level (now officially
the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929).
If the D to W in a nonflowing well is sub-
tracted from the altitude of the MP, the result is
the total head at the well. Total head, as we
know from fluid mechanics, is composed of
elevation head, pressure head, and velocity
head. Because ground water moves relatively
slowly, we can ignore velocity head. There-
fore, the total head at an observation well
involves only two components - elevation head
and pressure head. Ground water moves in the
direction of decreasing total head; this may
or may not be in the direction of decreasing
pressure head.
The equation for total head (hs) is
(I)
where z is elevation head and is the distance
from the datum plane to the point where the
pressure head is hp.
All other factors being constant, the rate of
ground-water movement depends on the hy-
draulic gradient. The hydraulic gradient is the
change in head per unit of distance in a given
direction. If not specified, the direction is
understood to be in the direction in which the
maximum rate of decrease in head occurs.
10
If we assume that the movement of ground
water is in the plane of the preceding draw-
ing - in other words, that it moves from well
1 to well 2 - we can calculate the hydraulic
gradient from the information given on the
drawing. The hydraulic gradient is hL/L where
h|_ is the head loss between wells 1 and 2 and L
is the distance between them, or
h L (100 ft -15 ft) - (98ft-18ft)
L " 780ft
85 ft - 80 ft _ 5ft
780 ft 780 ft
Gradients are usually expressed in feet/mile
or feetper 1000 eetThus
Both the direction of ground-water move-
ment and the hydraulic gradient can be deter-
mined if the following data are available for
three wells located in any triangular arrange-
ment such as that shown on Sketch A.
1. The relative geographic position of the
wells,
2. The distance between the wells, and
3. The relative position of the water level in
each well.
Steps in the solution are outlined below
and illustrated on Sketch B.
(a) Identify the well that has the inter-
mediate water level-that is, neither
the highest nor the lowest water level.
(b) Calculate the position between the
wells having the highest and lowest
water levels at which the ground-
water level is the same as in the
intermediate well.
(c) Draw a straight line between the
intermediate well and the point
identified in step b between the wells
having the highest and lowest water
level. This line represents a segment
of the water-level contour along
which the total head is the same as in
the intermediate well.
(d) Draw a line perpendicular to the
water-level contour and through
either the well with the highest or the
lowest water level. This line parallels
the direction of ground-water move-
ment.
(e) Divide the difference in water level
between the well and the contour by
the distance between the well and
the contour. The answer is the
hydraulic gradient.
SKETCH A SKETCH B
Well I
26.26 ft.
Well 2
26.20 ft
Well 3
26.07 ft.
0 25 50 IOO FEET
(b) (26.26-26.20) (26.26-26.07)
2I5 26.26 ft.
X = 68 ft.
(a) Well 2
W.L. = 26.20 ft
(e) 26.2 -26.07
HL _ O.I3 ft.
L " I33 ft
- 5.2 ft/mile
26.07 ft.
11
Hydraulic Conductivity
Unit element
of aquifer
Streamlines
representing
laminar flow
r / i
/^".* •
11 —— •
IIJ="°,
— —r
J. « .*.
•
5
• • •
* * • -.". ' o - . •
0 . - • & •
0 • •
*• <»-0 o . •
r2T.^«.
7^
150 ft'
day
Unit prism of aquifer
Aquifers transmit water from recharge areas
to discharge areas and thus function as pipe-
lines. The factors controlling ground-water
movement were first expressed in the form of
an equation by Henry Darcy in 1856. Darcy's
law is
where
dl
Q is the quantity of water,
K is hydraulic conductivity and
depends on the size and
arrangement of the water-
transmitting openings (pores
and fractures),
A is cross-sectional area through
which the flow occurs, and
dh/dl is the hydraulic gradient.1
Because the quantity of water (Q) is directly
proportional to the hydraulic gradient (dh/dl),
we know that ground-water flow is laminar -
that is, water particles tend to follow discrete
streamlines and not mix with particles in adja-
cent streamlines.
Hydraulic conductivity is expressed in terms
of a unit hydraulic gradient (such as foot per
foot) in order to permit ready comparison of
the water-transmitting capacity of different
materials.
The units of hydraulic conductivity are those
of velocity. Thus, if we rearrange equation 1 for
K, we obtain
Adh
_ (ft3 day"1 ) (ft) =
(ft2) (ft)(2)
'Where hydraulic gradient is discussed as an independent
entity, as in the preceding discussion of HE0C6 /JK)
GVOIEMS, it is shown s>rrbol ical ly as h{_/L. Where
hydraulic gradient appears as one of the factors in an
equation, as in equation I, it is shown $>rrbolically as
dh/dl to be consistent with other ground-water literature.
12
Hydraulic Conductivity of Selected Rocks
Hydraulic conductivity (rounded values)
Material_________________(ft/day) [(gal/day)/ft*] (meters/day)
Coarse sand ..................
Medium sand .................
Silt ...........................
Clay ..........................
Limestone (Castle Hayne) .....
Saprolite ......................
Granite and gneiss ............
Slate .........................
. . . . . 200
..... 130
..... 1
. . . . . 0.001
. . . . . 300
..... 5
..... 5
..... 3
1500
1000
5
0.01
2000
50
50
25
60
40
0.2
0.0004
80
2
2
1
Hydraulic conductivity replaces the term "field coefficient of permeability" and should be used when
referring to the water-transmitting characteristic of material in quantitative terms. It is still permissible
to refer in qualitative terms to "permeable" and "impermeable" material.
PROBLEM - Determine the hydraulic conductivity of the confined aquifer shown in the preceding
drawing in both feet per day and gallons per day per square foot.
(1) Solution in feet per day
(Equation) (Q) (A) (dl/dh)
K _ Qdl _ 150 ft3 y 1 y 1 ft _ 150 ft3 _ iqn ft/d K - Adh * day X ft* X 1 ft ' day ft* ' 15° ft/day
(2) Conversion of feet per day to gallons per day per square foot
13
Functions of
Ground-Water Systems
Discharge
area
GROUND-WATER SYSTEM
The aquifers and confining beds underlying
any area comprise the ground-water system of
the area. Hydraulically, this system serves two
functions: (1) it stores water to the extent of its
porosity, and (2) it transmits water from re-
charge areas to discharge areas. Thus, a
ground-water system serves both as a reservoir
and as a pipeline. With the exception of
cavernous limestones and lava flows, ground-
water systems are more effective as reservoirs
than as pipelines.
Water enters ground-water systems in
recharge areas and moves through them, as
dictated by hydraulic gradients and hydraulic
conductivities, to discharge areas.
The identification of recharge areas is
becoming increasingly important because of
the expanding use of the land surface for waste
disposal. In a humid area, such as North Caro-
lina, recharge occurs in all interstream areas -
that is, in all areas except along streams and
their adjoining flood plains. The streams and
flood plains are, under most conditions,
discharge areas.
Recharge rates are generally expressed in
terms of volume (such as gallons or ft3), per
unit of time (such as a day or a year), and per
unit of area (such as a square mile or acre).
When the units are reduced to their simpliest
form, the result is recharge expressed as a
depth of water on the land surface per unit of
time. Recharge rates vary from year to year,
depending on the amount of precipitation, its
seasonal distribution, air temperature, and
other factors. Among the other factors are land
use. For example, recharge rates are much
higher in forest than in cities.
14
Relatively few estimates of recharge rates
have been made in North Carolina. The
information presently available suggests that
rates in the Piedmont and mountains range
from about 100,000 gallons per day per square
mile in the areas underlain by Triassic rocks to
about 250,000 (gal/d)/mi2 in areas underlain by
granite and gneiss. Rates in the Coastal Plain
are believed to range from about 250,000
(gal/d)/mi2 in areas underlain by clayey soils to
1,000,000 (gal/d)/mi2 in areas underlain by
thick sandy soils.
The rate of movement of ground water from
recharge areas to discharge areas depends on
the hydraulic conductivities of the aquifers and
confining beds through which the water moves
and on the hydraulic gradients. (See GROUND-
WATER VELOCITY.) A convenient way of
showing the rate is in terms of the time required
for ground water to move from different parts
of a recharge area to the nearest discharge
area. The time ranges from a few days in the
zone adjacent to the discharge area to
thousands of years (millennia) for water that
moves from the central part of the recharge
area through the deeper parts of the system.
Natural discharge from ground-water
systems not only includes the flow of springs
and the seepage of water into stream channels,
but also evaporation from the upper part of the
capillary fringe where it occurs within a few
feet of the land surface. Large amounts of
water are also withdrawn from the capillary
fringe and zone of saturation by plants during
the growing season. Thus, discharge areas not
only include the channels of perennial streams
but also the adjoining flood plains and other
low-lying areas.
One of the most significant differences
between recharge areas and discharge areas is
that discharge areas are invariably much
smaller in areal extent that recharge areas. This
shows, as we would expect, that discharge
areas are more "efficient" than recharge areas.
Recharge involves unsaturated movement of
water in the vertical direction; in other words, in
the direction in which the hydraulic conductiv-
ity is generally the lowest, whereas discharge
involves saturated movement, much of it in the
horizontal direction - that is, in the direction of
the largest hydraulic conductivity.
15
16
PART II.
GROUND-WATER GEOLOGY
OF NORTH CAROLINA
"It is time that we return to examining
hydrologic systems and attempting to
describe the systems in a more realistic,
quantitative manner. When one comes to
solving problems of chemical contamina-
tion, it is necessary to quantify the
distribution of porosity, dispersivity, and
other factors. Dispersivity measured at only
a few field locations tends to be large; from
three to more than five orders of magnitude
larger than those measured in the labora-
tory. This suggests that the geologic
complexity of real aquifers greatly compli-
cates the flow field, causing increased
hydrodynamic dispersion.
-From remarks by Dr. John Bredehoeft at hearings on
"Ground-water quality research and development"
before the Subcommittee on Environment and the
Atmosphere, 95th Congress, 2nd Session, April
1978, p. 236.
17
Physical Setting of the
Ground-Water System
MOUNTAINS PIEDMONT COASTAL PLAIN
Bint Rid9« front
Pi«4mont Pletttu
•5-J
'-.i'Stt lt»tl^jjxx*W
&*&*!&&%
Gronitt t«4
6 ntitt
'Cfcoflttlt 6nti*t t«4 Btlt Scftitt
I—10
From the standpoint of ground-water
hydrology, North Carolina may be divided into
two zones, one zone consisting of the Coastal
Plain and the other consisting of the Piedmont
Plateau and the Appalachian Mountains.
Because differences in the ground-water
system coincide with the different topographic
divisions of the State, it will be useful to briefly
review these divisions.
As Jasper L. Stuckey, former North Carolina
State Geologist, has said, "The State of North
Carolina extends from the crest of the Great
Smoky and Unaka mountains on the west, to
the Atlantic Ocean on the east and lies across
three major topographic provinces of the
United States. As a result, it is divided into three
natural divisions—the Coastal Plain on the
east, the Piedmont Plateau in the center, and
the Appalachian Mountains on the west.
Beginning at sea level at the eastern edge of the
State the surface of North Carolina rises
gradually in elevation and increases in
irregularity until it reaches its maximum height
and ruggedness in the Appalachian Mountains
on the west."
The Coastal Plain includes almost one-half
of the area of the State and extends west from
the Atlantic Ocean to the Fall Line. The Fall
Line is not a line but a zone 30 to 40 miles wide
that is marked by discontinuous rapids where
major streams leave the bedrock areas of the
Piedmont and flow onto the unconsolidated
sediments of the Coastal Plain. Altitudes in the
Coastal Plain range from sea level at the coast
to about 300 to 500 ft. along the Fall Line. The
Coastal Plain can conveniently be divided into
the Tidewater Region, in which the effect of
tides and other oceanic influences are
apparent, and the Inner Coastal Plain which,
though underlain by unconsolidated (Coastal
Plain) sediments, is not subject to direct
oceanic effect.
The Piedmont Plateau contains about
20,000 mi2, or two-fifths of the land area of the
State. It lies between the Coastal Plain on the
east and the Appalachian Mountains on the
west. Altitudes in the Piedmont range from
about 500 ft above sea level along the Fall Line
to about 1500 to 2000 ft. along its western
border. The Piedmont consists of well-
rounded hills and long-rolling ridges with a
northeast-southwest trend. Parts of the
Piedmont contain prominent hills referred to as
mountains, including the Uwharrie Mountains
in Montgomery and Randolph Counties, the
South Mountains in Burke and Rutherford
Counties, and the Brushy Mountains in Wilkes
County.
The Appalachian Mountains are bounded on
the east by the Blue Ridge Mountains and on
the west by the Great Smoky and Unaka
Mountains. The mountain slopes are gentle,
presenting smooth rounded outlines. The
mountain region of North Carolina contains
the highest peak east of the Mississippi, Mt.
Mitchell at 6,684 ft., 43 peaks above 6,000 ft,
and 82 peaks between 5,000 and 6,000 ft. in
altitude. The eastern Continental Divide
follows the Blue Ridge Mountains so that most
of the mountain area drains west to the Gulf of
Mexico. The streams are well graded and
cascades and waterfalls are only locally
abundant.
Reference: Stuckey, Jasper L, 1965, North Carolina: its
geology and mineral resources: North Carolina Depart-
ment of Conservation and Development, 550 p.
19
Water-Bearing Rocks
The rocks underlying the surface of North
Carolina form the environment in which
ground water occurs and moves.
Geologists divide all rocks exposed at the
Earth's surface into one of two great classes:
(1) igneous, or (2) sedimentary. Igneous rocks
are those that have formed from a molten or
partially-molten state. Some types of igneous
rocks, including granite, solidify at great depth
below the land surface and are referred to as
intrusive igneous rocks. Other igneous rocks
form from lava or volcanic ash ejected onto the
surface and are referred to as extrusive
igneous rocks.
Sedimentary rocks are rocks formed by the
accumulation of sediment in water or from the
air. Most sedimentary rocks are unconsolida-
ted (soil-like) at the time of formation. If they
are, in time, buried deeply enough, or if they
undergo certain chemical changes, they may
become consolidated.
Both igneous and sedimentary rocks may,
over the course of geologic time, reach depths
beneath the Earth's crust at which they are
subjected to great heat and pressure. This may
alter both their structural characteristics and
their mineral composition to such an extent
that they are changed into metamorphic rocks.
Depending on their original mode of origin,
they may be referred to, for example, as
metavolcanic or metasedimentary rocks.
North Carolina is underlain by an unusually
large number of different types of rocks,
including representatives of both the igneous
and sedimentary classes and types of both
classes that have been subjected to metamor-
phism. The major types of rocks are shown on
the accompanying generalized geological
map.
The Piedmont and mountain regions are
underlain by igneous and metamorphosed
igneous and sedimentary rocks that are
referred to collectively as bedrock. They form
broad northeast - southwest trending zones in
which the rocks are of similar composition and
origin. Most of these rocks were formed in the
Precambrian and Paleozoic Erasof the Earth's
history and thus are at least several hundred
million years old. The bedrock in the Piedmont
and mountains is exposed at the surface along
steep hillsides and stream channels and in
roadcuts. In most other areas they are covered
by unconsolidated material formed from the
breakdown of the bedrock in the process refer-
red to by geologists as weathering. This layer
of weathered material is referred to as saprolite
or residuum.
The Coastal Plain region is also underlain by
the same types of igneous and methamorphic
rocks as those present in the Piedmont.
However, in the Coastal Plain they are covered
by unconcolidated sedimentary deposits
which range in thickness from a few feet along
the Fall Line to about 10,000 ft. at Cape
Hatteras. (See the geologic section in
PHYSICAL SETTING OF THE GROUND-
WATER SYSTEM.) The sediments underlying
the Coastal Plain include sand, clay, beds
composed of seashells, and limestone.
20
84°83"82
to " T .Metamorphosed
volconic rocks
Yorktown Formation
(clays and shell beds)
Castle Hayne Limestone (sandy to dense limestone)NvJ Metomorphosed sedimentary
and volconic rocksPee Dee Formation
(sands, clays limestones)Gneiss and schist
Black Creek Formotion (sands, clays, and morls)
.*.".\\"\ Mostly micaceous schist •••••I
Tuscolooso Formation equi- valent (sands and clays)
Triossic rocks(sandstone and conglomerates)
76"
Rock Units and Aquifers
in the Coastal Plain
The Coastal Plain of North Carolina is
underlain by sedimentary rocks that were
deposited in water in several different layers
which geologists refer to as formations.
Formations are commonly given names for
places near which they are exposed at the land
surface, for ease in referring to them in
geologic literature.
Rock layers are normally given names by
geologists if they have a distinct composition
or, if of variable composition, include materials
deposited during a particular segment of
geologic time. Named rock units may or may
not coincide with hydrologic units so that in
ground-water reports some aquifers may be
referred to by the formal geologic names used
by geologists, such as the Castle Hayne
Limestone and Yorktown Formation, and
others may be given more informal names,
such as the "Upper aquifer", "Surficial aquifer"
or "post-Miocene deposits." The name
"Surficial aquifer" indicates the aquifer in any
area that is closest to land surface and thus is
clearly identifiable, regardless of any other
names that may have been assigned to that
rock unit.
Non-geologists concerned both with ground-
water problems and with ground-water studies
in the Coastal Plain are probably con-
fused by the different named applied to the
different hydrologic units. The following chart
was prepared in an effort to eliminate some of
this confusion. We should note, however, that in
preparing the chart we have neither tried to
include all formation names nor been overly
concerned with the relative geologic age of the
formations. The names used in the last two
columns can be confusing to the extent that all
units are referred to as "aquifers." Confining
beds composed of clay occur in all of the
formations and in the formations of Cretaceous
age clay comprises about half of the total
thickness.
The two most important aquifers in the
Coastal Plain are the upper aquifer and the
limestone aquifer. Recharge of the ground-
water system is from precipitation on the land
surface. Therefore, the surficial aquifer has the
largest yield in terms of rate per unit area (for
example, gallons per minute per square mile).
The upper aquifer is also most subject to
pollution from land-surface waste disposal. The
limestone aquifer is the most productive aquifer
in North Carolina in terms of yields of individual
wells. Wells capable of yielding more than 1000
gal/min can. readily be developed in this
aquifer.
Geologic
age
Formation or geologic
name
Names used in some
ground-water reports
Simpliest useful
hydrologic names
Pleistocene
Pliocene
Miocene
Oligocene
Eocene
Paleocene
Cretaceous
Pleistocene deposits
Croatan Formation
Yorktown Formation
Pungo River Formation
Belgrade Formation
River Bend Formation
Castle Hayne Limestone
Beaufort Formation
Peedee Formation
Black Creek Formation
"Tuscaloosa" Formation
Post-Miocene deposits
Yorktown aquifer
Upper aquifer
Castle Hayne aquifer Limestone aquifer
Beaufort aquifer
Cretaceous aquifer Lower aquifer
22
The complex interlaying of the sediments
underlying the Coastal Plain is shown in the
following cross section. It will also be observed
from the cross section that the rock layers (and
formations) underlying the Coastal Plain dip
toward the coast at a rate of about 15 ft./mi. As a
result, each formation occurs at a greater depth
below land surface toward the coast.
Saprehti and
Tirraci dipotiti
0 10 20 30 KILOMETERS
Vertical exaggeration X 66
23
Ground-Water Situation
in the Coastal Plain
T,.-T-~^*:-^t
RKTOWN DEPOSITS •>*>:Lj
^^^^^-•--^^^^rr; YORK TOWN -.AQUIFER -'^^^r^jl^f^m S
X S±r
L.N ' .' ' . ' i . 'CASTLE HAYNE^ AQUIFER ~=-^r
Sand —JT Clay Shells Limestone
Recharge of the ground-water system in the
Coastal Plain occurs in the "upland" areas
above the flood plains of perennial streams.
Water reaching the saturated zone moves
downward and laterally through the system to
discharge areas.
Ground-water discharge occurs by seepage
through the bottoms and sides of streams and
drainage ditches and also through evaporation
from the top of the capillary fringe in
flood plains and other areas in which the water
table is within several feet of the land surface
During the growing season, ground water is
also used by plants whose roots reach the
capillary fringe or saturated zone. In the area
adjacent to the coast, ground'water also
discharges by seepage into the sides and
bottoms of estuaries and the ocean.
The presence of clay layers in the Coastal
Plain formations hampers recharge to the
deeper aquifers, so that most of the recharge
tends to move laterally to discharge areas
through the shallowest aquifers. Recharge to
the deepest aquifers occurs only in the central
part of the interstream recharge areas. This is
an important point relative to waste disposal, in
that if pollution of the deeper aquifers is to be
avoided, waste disposal sites should be located
as close as possible to perennial streams.
Prior to the construction of drainage ditches
into the central part of the interstream areas,
the water table reached the land surface in
these areas during the fall, winter, and early
spring recharge season. As a result, water was
ponded on the surface for periods of several
months each year in high-level swamps
referred to as pocos/ns.
Two regional aspects of the Coastal Plain are
of primary importance from the standpoint of
ground-water occurrence and availability. The
first is the nature of the surficial materials,
which controls the recharge to the ground-
water system. The second is the geologic con-
ditions that control the occurrence of aquifers
and confining beds.
24
The materials forming the surface of the
Coastal Plain can usefully be divided into
sandy and clayey soils on the basis of their
effect on ground-water recharge. Recharge in
the areas underlain by sandy soils is much
more effective than in the areas underlain by
clayey soils. One of the consequences of this is
a much larger sustained base flow of streams in
these areas.
The geologic conditions in the area of about
25,000 mi2 occupied by the Coastal Plain
differ significantly from one part of the region
to another. These differences affect both the
occurrence and the availability of ground
water. As an aid to understanding the Coastal
Plain ground-water system, it is useful to divide
the region into four hydrologic areas.
Information on these is summarized in the
following table in which the areas are listed in
order from the simpliest to the most complex.
Hydrologic
area
Geohydrologic
characteristics
Yield of the most
productive w«Hs
(gal/mln)
Remarks
Sand Hilts
Outer Banks
Castle Hayne
Limestone
Central
Coastal
Plain
Productive water-bearing sand
at the land surface and over-
lying, for the most part, much
less-productive material.
Productive water-bearing sand
at the land surface containing
fresh water in contact with
sea water.
Productive limestone overlain
and underlain by less-productive
sand interbedded with clay.
Numerous thin layers of water-
bearing sand complexly interbedded
with clay.
50-250
25-100
more than
1000
250-1000
Water obtained from both bored wells
and from screened drilled and driven
wells. Water only slightly mineralized.
Water obtained from both shallow,
vertical, screened wells, and from
horizontal collectors. Fresh-water
zone subject to salt-water encroach-
ment both from above and below.
Drilled open-hole wells. Water
moderately hard. Aquifer is confined
and large withdrawals affect a large area.
Sediments of Cretaceous age comprise
most productive zones and is
tapped by multiple-screened drilled
wells. Water of excellent quality
and, in places, naturally softened.
Surficial sand aquifer also widely
used for domestic supplies.
SOILS HYOROLOGIC AREAS
Sandy
soils
25
Rock Units and Aquifers
in the Piedmont and Mountains
• ^^^^--M^'M^^^m.
rt!tri GREAT SHOP MCTJNTAIM BELT
iJj3 ME1ASKDIMENTAEY ROCKS
(7771 CAROLIHA SLXp BELT
lXj£J tlcxaVOI^AWICS
__ n*rit-eiAj>it, CSubimlt)
f=~j ARCILLITE(Subunlt)
rasa TRIASSIC BASIHS
o 10 20 >o «o so
The rocks underlying the Piedmont and
mountains can be divided into two groups:
(1) bedrock, and (2) saprolite (or residuum).
The saprolite underlies the land surface and
ranges in thickness from a foot or two near
bedrock outcrops to more than 100 ft. Bedrock
underlies the saprolite and is the parent rock
from which the saprolite was derived in the
process referred to as weathering.
Many stream valleys, especially those of
larger streams, are underlain by a layer of
material similar in composition to saprolite.
This material, which has been deposited by the
streams during floods, is correctly referred to
as alluvium. However, to avoid unnecessary
complications, we will lump the alluvium in
with the saprolite for the purpose of this
discussion.
The bedrock underlying the Piedmont and
mountains consists of many different types of
igneous and metamorphosed igneous and
sedimentary rocks. The Generalized Geologi-
cal Map of North Carolina accompanying the
discussion of WATER-BEARING ROCKS
divides the bedrock in the Piedmont and
mountains into six units. The 1:500,000 scale
Geologic Map of North Carolina, published in
1958, divides the bedrock in the same area into
48 different units. But, a much larger number of
units have been identified and are shown on
large scale geologic maps.
The bedrock units differ from each other in
mineral composition and other geologic
characteristics. Fortunately, these differences
do not result in large differences in hydraulic
characteristics so that it is possible to combine
the bedrock units into a relatively small number
of hydrogeologic units.
The accompanying map shows the hydro-
geologic units into which the bedrock in the
Piedmont and mountains has been divided by
the U.S. Geological Survey and the North
Carolina Groundwater Section.
The most productive hydrogeologic units
are the Great Smoky Mountain belt and the
Blue Ridge-Inner Piedmont belt. The least
productive units are the Carolina Slate Belt and
the Triassic Basins. The Charlotte Belt is
intermediate in productivity.
26
Ground-Water Situation
in the Piedmont and Mountains
The saprolite (weathered rock) that forms
the land surface in the Piedmont and
mountains consists of unconsolidated granu-
lar material. It thus contains water in the pore
spaces between rock particles.
The bedrock, on the other hand, does not
have any significant intergranular (primary)
porosity. It contains water, instead, in sheet-
like openings formed along fractures (that is,
breaks in the otherwise "solid" rock). Fractures
in bedrock are of two types: (1) joints, which
are breaks along which there has been no
differential movement; and (2) faults, which are
breaks along which the adjacent rocks have
undergone differential movement.
Faults are formed during earthquakes and
generally contain larger and more extensive
openings than those developed along joints.
Joints, however, are far more numerous than
faults.
Fractures (joints and faults) are more
abundant under valleys, draws, and other
surface depressions than under hills. In fact,
geologists assume that it is the presence of
fractures that determined the position of
valleys in the first place. Fractures tend to be
more closely-spaced and the openings
developed along them tend to be larger near
the surface of the bedrock. Most fractures
appear to be non water-bearing below a depth
of 300 to 400 ft. Large water-bearing openings,
penetrated below this depth are probably
associated with faults.
The ground-water system in the Piedmont
and mountains is recharged by precipitation
on the interstream areas. A part of the
precipitation infiltrates through the unsatu-
rated zone to the water table, which normally
occurs in the saprolite.
Ground water moves laterally and downward
through the saprolite to points of ground-
water seepage (springs) on the hillsides and to
the streams in the adjacent valleys. Some of the
water in the saprolite also moves downward
into the bedrock and, thereafter, through the
fractures to the adjacent valleys.
27
Hydraulic Characteristics of the
Piedmont and Mountain
Ground-Water System
STORAGE
IN
SAPROLITE
STORAGE
IN
BEDROCK
=H
One of the most basic concepts of ground-
water hydrology is that aquifers function both
as reservoirs, in which water is in storage, and
as pipelines, which transmit water from one
point to another. This is referred to as the
reservoir-pipeline concept This concept forms
a useful basis on which to discuss the hydraulic
characteristics of the Piedmont and mountain
ground-water system.
The reservoir (storage) function of aquifers
depends on the porosity. The pipeline function
depends on the hydraulic conductivity and the
thickness of the aquifer. The approximate
range in porosity and hydraulic conductivity
for the saprolite and bedrock is shown in the
following table.
Rock type Porosity in percent
Saprolite 20-30
Bedrock 0.1-1
Hydraulic
conductivity In
feet per day
1-20
1-20
The above values suggest that the principal
difference between saprolite and bedrock is in
water-storage capacity. In other words, the
saprolite has the capacity to store a much
larger quantity of water than does the bedrock.
This is not the entire story, however.
As we noted above, the capacity of an aquifer
to transmit water depends both on hydraulic
conductivity and on aquifer thickness. The part
of the bedrock containing water-bearing
fractures is several times thicker than the
saprolite.
28
We can then, without great error, view the
ground-water system in the Piedmont and
mountains as consisting of a saprolite reser-
voir overlying a bedrock pipeline consisting of
numerous small, intercorin~ected~pipes. In the
vicinity of a pumping well the bedrock
fractures ("pipes") convey water from the
saprolite reservoir to the well.
The yield of a well drawing from fractured
bedrock depends on several factors. The most
important of these are believed to be:
1. The number, size, areal extent, and
degree of interconnection of the fractures
penetrated by the well,
2. The thickness of saturated saprolite in the
vicinity of the well and the specific yield of
the saprolite, and
3. The hydraulic conductivity of the sapro-
lite and the nature of the hydraulic con-
nection between the saprolite and the
bedrock.
The number and the size of the fractures
control the rate at which water can enter the
well. The areal extent and degree of intercon-
nection of the fractures control the size of the
area that supplies water to the well.
The thickness and the specific yield of the
saprolite determines the volume of water
available from storage in the saprolite. The
hydraulic conductivity of the saprolite and the
nature of the hydraulic connection between
the saprolite and the bedrock determines the
rate at which water can drain from the
saprolite into the bedrock fractures.
29
Selecting Well Sites in the
Piedmont and Mountains
Rock
outcrop
5 Number related to topographic position
(3) Number related to saprolite thickness
Most ground-water supplies in the Piedmont
and mountains are obtained from wells that are
cased through the saprolite and finished with
open holes in the bedrock. The yield of these
wells depends on the number and size of the
fractures they penetrate. Therefore, where
moderate to large supplies of water are
needed, well sites should be selected at the
places where fractures appear to be most
abundant.
H. E. LeGrand, of the U.S. Geological
Survey, attempted in 1967 to indicate the
relative favorability of well sites in the
Piedmont and mountains by assigning point
values to areas on the basis of saprolite thick-
ness and topographic position. The point
values assigned by LeGrand to features of the
land surface that suggest thickness of saprolite
and to different topographic positions are
shown below. Selected values of each are also
indicated on the above sketch.
30
Features of land surface Point
related to saprolite thickness value
Bare rock-almost no soil 0-2
Some rock outcrops-very thin soil 2-6
A few rock outcrops-thin soil 6-9
No fresh outcrops-moderately
thick soil 9-12
No rock outcrops-thick soil 12-15
Topographic position
Steep ridge top
Upland steep slope
Rounded upland
Midpoint of ridge slope
Gentle upland slope
Broad flat upland
Lower part of upland slope
Valley bottom of flood plain
Draw with small catchment
Draw with large catchment
Point
vaiue
0
2
4
5
7
8
9
12
15
18
The point values for saprolite thickness and
topographic position are added and the total is
used in conjunction with the following table to
estimate the chance of obtaining different
yields. (The following table is an abbreviated
and slightly modified version of the table
prepared by LeGrand.)
Total points
assigned to
a site
5
10
15
20
25
30
Average
yield
(gal/min)
3
6
15
25
40
60
3 gal/min
50
65
80
90
93
96
Chance of success,
10 gal/min
20
40
55
70
80
90
In percent, for a well to yield at
25 gai/min
5
15
30
50
65
75
50 gal/min
3
15
15
25
45
55
least—
75 gal/min
__•»
—
—
20
35
45
Most of the wells used in LeGrand's analysis
were drilled to obtain water for domestic needs
at the sites most convenient to the well owners.
Thus, no special attempt was made to select
the most favorable sites. We know that the
chances of success can be greatly improved if
wells are not only located in valleys but also at
places where the topography suggests the
presence of intersecting fractures. In fact,
recent studies suggest that where best tech-
nology is applied in the selection of well sites,
an average yield of 150 gal/min can be
expected.
Reference: LeGrand, H. E., 1967, Ground water of the
Piedmont and Blue Ridge Provinces in the Southeastern
States: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 538.
31
REFERENCE 23
REFERENCE 24
Soil Map—Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
(Peoples Cleaners)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
3/16/2023
Page 1 of 339018203901900390198039020603902140390222039023003901820390190039019803902060390214039022203902300512860512940513020513100513180513260513340513420513500513580
512860 512940 513020 513100 513180 513260 513340 513420 513500 513580
35° 15' 49'' N 80° 51' 31'' W35° 15' 49'' N80° 51' 1'' W35° 15' 33'' N
80° 51' 31'' W35° 15' 33'' N
80° 51' 1'' WN
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
0 150 300 600 900Feet
0 50 100 200 300Meters
Map Scale: 1:3,480 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
SITE
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 22, Sep 12, 2022
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 13, 2022—May
9, 2022
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Soil Map—Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
(Peoples Cleaners)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
3/16/2023
Page 2 of 3
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
CeD2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
7.3 13.6%
CuB Cecil-Urban land complex, 2 to
8 percent slopes
44.1 82.0%
Ur Urban land 2.3 4.3%
Totals for Area of Interest 53.7 100.0%
Soil Map—Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Peoples Cleaners
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
3/16/2023
Page 3 of 3
REFERENCE 25

REFERENCE 26

SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE

REFERENCE 27

[Ú
[Ú
[Ú
[Ú
")
")
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
!(
!(
§¨¦
§¨¦
§¨¦
§¨¦§¨¦
")
")
")
!(
!(
#*
!(
")
")
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*

Vest WTP820 Beatties Ford Rd.
Franklin WTP5200 Brookshire Blvd.
Mt. Island Main Water Intake12548 Pump Station Rd.
Lake Norman Water Intake7420 Oliver Hager Rd.
Lee S. Dukes WTP7980 Babe Stillwell Rd.
Field Crews / Zone 25730 General Commerce Dr.
Customer Service & Engineering5100 Brookshire Blvd.
Environmental Services Facility & Administration4222 Westmont Dr.
LANCASTER CO., SC
YORK CO., SC
GASTON CO.
LINCOLN CO.
IREDELL CO.
CABARRUS CO.
UNION CO.
Field Crews / Zone 111609 Horde Dr
Field Crews / Zone 44100 West Tyvola Road
Field Crews / Zone 312131 Park Rd
Installation and Development Services 600 East Trade Street (basement level)
Mallard Creek WWTP12400 Hwy 29 North
McDowell Creek WWTP4901 Neck Rd.
McAlpine Creek WWTP12701 Lancaster Hwy.
Sugar Creek WWTP5301 Closeburn Rd.
Irwin Creek WWTP4000 Westmont Dr.

Oxford Glen
Ashe PlantationS Tryon StPark RdStatesville RdN Tryon StSouth BvRea RdProvi
dence RdAlbemarle Rd
Idlewild Rd
W e s t B v
Mo
nroe R
d
Wilkinson Bv
Brookshire Bv
E
W
T H
arris B
v
E Independence Bv
T h e P la za
La
wyers R
d
Carmel RdSteele Creek RdCol
ony RdCentral Av
W W T Harris BvMt Holly-Huntersville RdSharon RdBrief RdSam Furr Rd
Sardis Rd Blair RdN Graham StPineville-M atthew s RdB
eatties Ford R
d
Lancaster HyMccoy RdRidge Rd
Ar d re y K e ll R d
Elm
L
n
N C 73 Hy
Johnst
on RdMallard Creek RdM ckee RdEastfield RdS un s et Rd
Eastway DrOakdale RdU n iversity C ity B vRandolph Rd
E 7th StGrey RdHambright Rd
Westinghouse Bv N Sharon Amity RdHarrisburg RdMatthews-Mint Hill RdMarvin Rd
York Rd
Fairview Rd
Cabarrus RdHood RdShamrock DrReames RdW Arrowood Rd
Plaza Rd Ext
E John St
East Bv
Selwyn AvLittle Rock RdLebanon RdOld Plank Rd
Plott
RdYorkmont Rd Sh
ear
er RdPence Rd
Gibbon Rd
N Davidson StSam Newell RdRama RdDixie River RdE 4th St
B
ellhav
en B
v Old Statesville RdChoate Cr
Bro
w
ne R
d
W e st C a ta w b a A v
Tom Short RdHucks Rd
Wed
di
ngt
on RdCaldwell RdQueen City Dr Pavili
on BvMiranda Rd
Hamilton Rd
David Cox Rd
Remount Rd
Craig Av
Sledge Rd
Moss RdP a rkton R d
IBM Dr
Barringer DrMarsh Rd
Raintree Ln
E 36th St
Main St
Alexander Rd
S Trade StZ
o
a
r
R
d Colville RdSharon LnScaleybark Rd
Mclean Rd
E Westinghouse Bv N Main StCar
owi
nds BvQ
u
ail H
ollo
w
R
dEuclid AvKil
bor
ne Dr
S a rd is L nQueens Rd WestW Craighead Rd
Rocky River Church RdS Wendover RdEngland StWestmore land Rd
High Ridge RdN Old Statesville RdLansdowne RdV e rh oe ff D rJohn Kirk DrBoyce RdBriar Creek RdPerformance Rd
McAlway Rd77
77
85
485
85
September 26, 2017­
!(Raw Water Intakes
!(Water Treatment Plants
$1 Water Tanks & Storage
[Ú Water Booster Pump Stations
")Wastewater Treatment Plants
#*Field Crew Zone Offices
Field Crew ZonesCharlotteCorneliusDavidsonHuntersvilleMatthewsMint HillPineville
#*CLTWater Office Locations

REFERENCE 28

REFERENCE 29

Output generated 23JAN2023:12:39:29
Commercial Air Inputs 1
Variable
Commercial
Air
Default
Value
Site-Specific
Value
AFgw (Attenuation Factor Groundwater) unitless 0.001 0.001
AFss (Attenuation Factor Sub-Slab) unitless 0.03 0.03
ATw (averaging time - composite worker)365 365
EDw (exposure duration - composite worker) yr 25 25
EFw (exposure frequency - composite worker) day/yr 250 250
ETw (exposure time - composite worker) hr 8 8
THQ (target hazard quotient) unitless 0.1 0.1
LT (lifetime) yr 70 70
TR (target risk) unitless 1.0E-06 1.0E-04
Output generated 23JAN2023:12:39:29
Commercial Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels (VISL)2
Key: I = IRIS; P = PPRTV; O = OPP; A = ATSDR; C = Cal EPA; X = PPRTV Screening Level; H = HEAST; D = DWSHA; W = TEF applied; E = RPF applied;
U = user provided; G = see RSL User's Guide Section 5; CA = cancer; NC = noncancer.
Chemical
CAS
Number
Does the
chemical
meet
the
definition
for
volatility?
(HLC>1E-5
or VP>1)
Does the
chemical
have
inhalation
toxicity
data?
(IUR
and/or
RfC)
Is Chemical
Sufficiently
Volatile and Toxic
to
Pose Inhalation
Risk
Via Vapor
Intrusion
from Soil
Source?
(Cvp > Ci,a,Target?)
Is Chemical
Sufficiently
Volatile and Toxic
to
Pose Inhalation
Risk
Via Vapor
Intrusion from
Groundwater
Source?
(Chc > Ci,a,Target?)
Target
Indoor Air
Concentration
(TCR=0.0001
or THQ=0.1)
MIN(Cia,c,Cia,nc)
(µg/m3)
Toxicity
Basis
Target
Sub-Slab and
Near-source
Soil Gas
Concentration
(TCR=0.0001
or THQ=0.1)
Csg,Target
(µg/m3)
Target
Groundwater
Concentration
(TCR=0.0001
or THQ=0.1)
Cgw,Target
(µg/L)
Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4 Yes Yes Yes Yes 1.75E+01 NC 5.84E+02 2.42E+01
Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 Yes Yes Yes Yes 8.76E-01 NC 2.92E+01 2.18E+00
Is Target
Groundwater
Concentration
< MCL?
(Cgw < MCL?)
Pure Phase
Vapor
Concentration
Cvp\
(25 ℃)\
(µg/m3)
Maximum
Groundwater
Vapor
Concentration
Chc\
(µg/m3)
Temperature
for Maximum
Groundwater
Vapor
Concentration
(℃)
Lower
Explosive
Limit
LEL
(%
by
volume)
LEL
Ref
IUR
(ug/m 3)-1
IUR
Ref
RfC
(mg/m3)
RfC
Ref
Mutagenic
Indicator
Carcinogenic
VISL
TCR=0.0001
Cia,c(µg/m3)
Noncarcinogenic
VISL
THQ=0.1
Cia,nc(µg/m3)
No (5)1.65E+08 1.49E+08 25 -2.60E-07 I 4.00E-02 I No 4.72E+03 1.75E+01
Yes (5)4.88E+08 5.15E+08 25 8.00 CRC 4.10E-06 I 2.00E-03 I Mut 2.99E+02 8.76E-01
Output generated 23JAN2023:12:39:29
Commercial Vapor Intrusion Risk 3
Chemical
CAS
Number
Site
Groundwater
Concentration
Cgw\
(µg/L)
Site
Indoor Air
Concentration
Ci,a\
(µg/m3)
VI
Carcinogenic
Risk
CDI
(µg/m3)
VI
Carcinogenic
Risk
CR
VI
Hazard
CDI
(mg/m3)
VI
Hazard
HQ
IUR
(ug/m3)-1
Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4 1600 1.16E+03 9.44E+01 2.45E-05 2.64E-01 6.61E+00 2.60E-07
Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 12 4.83E+00 3.94E-01 1.62E-06 1.10E-03 5.52E-01 4.10E-06
*Sum ---2.62E-05 -7.16E+00 -
IUR
Ref
Chronic
RfC
(mg/m3)
RfC
Ref
Temperature
(℃)\
for
Groundwater
Vapor
Concentration Mutagen?
I 4.00E-02 IRIS 25 No
I 2.00E-03 IRIS 25 Mut
--
Output generated 23JAN2023:12:39:29
Chemical Properties 4
Chemical
CAS
Number
Does the
chemical
meet
the
definition
for
volatility?
(HLC>1E-5
or VP>1)
Does the
chemical
have
inhalation
toxicity
data?
(IUR
and/or
RfC)MW
MW
Ref
Vapor
Pressure
VP
(mm Hg)
VP
Ref
S
(mg/L)
S
Ref
MCL
(ug/L)
Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4 Yes Yes 165.83 PHYSPROP 1.85E+01 PHYSPROP 2.06E+02 PHYSPROP 5
Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 Yes Yes 131.39 PHYSPROP 6.90E+01 PHYSPROP 1.28E+03 PHYSPROP 5
HLC
(atm-m 3/mole)
Henry's
Law
Constant
(unitless)
H` and HLC
Ref
Henry's
Law
Constant
Used in
Calcs
(unitless)
Normal
Boiling
Point
BP
(K)
BP
Ref
Critical
Temperature
TC\
(K)
TC\
Ref
Enthalpy of
vaporization
at
the normal
boiling point
ΔHv,b\
(cal/mol)
ΔHv,b\
Ref
Lower
Explosive
Limit
LEL
(%
by
volume)
LEL
Ref
1.77E-02 7.24E-01 PHYSPROP 7.24E-01 394.45 PHYSPROP 6.20E+02 YAWS 8288.72 CRC -
9.85E-03 4.03E-01 PHYSPROP 4.03E-01 360.35 PHYSPROP 5.71E+02 YAWS 7504.78 CRC 8.00 CRC
Output generated 08JUN2023:16:53:33
Resident Air Inputs 1
Variable
Resident
Air
Default
Value
Site-Specific
Value
AFgw (Attenuation Factor Groundwater) unitless 0.001 0.001
AFss (Attenuation Factor Sub-Slab) unitless 0.03 0.03
EDres (exposure duration) years 26 26
ED0-2 (mutagenic exposure duration first phase) years 2 2
ED2-6 (mutagenic exposure duration second phase) years 4 4
ED6-16 (mutagenic exposure duration third phase) years 10 10
ED16-26 (mutagenic exposure duration fourth phase) years 10 10
EFres (exposure frequency) days/year 350 350
EF0-2 (mutagenic exposure frequency first phase) days/year 350 350
EF2-6 (mutagenic exposure frequency second phase) days/year 350 350
EF6-16 (mutagenic exposure frequency third phase) days/year 350 350
EF16-26 (mutagenic exposure frequency fourth phase) days/year 350 350
ETres (exposure time) hours/day 24 24
ET0-2 (mutagenic exposure time first phase) hours/day 24 24
ET2-6 (mutagenic exposure time second phase) hours/day 24 24
ET6-16 (mutagenic exposure time third phase) hours/day 24 24
ET16-26 (mutagenic exposure time fourth phase) hours/day 24 24
THQ (target hazard quotient) unitless 0.1 0.1
LT (lifetime) years 70 70
TR (target risk) unitless 1.0E-06 1.0E-06
Output generated 08JUN2023:16:53:33
Resident Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels (VISL)2
Key: I = IRIS; P = PPRTV; O = OPP; A = ATSDR; C = Cal EPA; X = PPRTV Screening Level; H = HEAST; D = DWSHA; W = TEF applied; E = RPF applied;
U = user provided; G = see RSL User's Guide Section 5; CA = cancer; NC = noncancer.
Chemical
CAS
Number
Does the
chemical
meet
the
definition
for
volatility?
(HLC>1E-5
or VP>1)
Does the
chemical
have
inhalation
toxicity
data?
(IUR
and/or
RfC)
Is Chemical
Sufficiently
Volatile and Toxic
to
Pose Inhalation
Risk
Via Vapor
Intrusion
from Soil
Source?
(Cvp > Ci,a,Target?)
Is Chemical
Sufficiently
Volatile and Toxic
to
Pose Inhalation
Risk
Via Vapor
Intrusion from
Groundwater
Source?
(Chc > Ci,a,Target?)
Target
Indoor Air
Concentration
(TCR=1E-06
or THQ=0.1)
MIN(Cia,c,Cia,nc)
(µg/m3)
Toxicity
Basis
Target
Sub-Slab and
Near-source
Soil Gas
Concentration
(TCR=1E-06
or THQ=0.1)
Csg,Target
(µg/m3)
Target
Groundwater
Concentration
(TCR=1E-06
or THQ=0.1)
Cgw,Target
(µg/L)
Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4 Yes Yes Yes Yes 4.17E+00 NC 1.39E+02 5.76E+00
Vinyl Chloride 75-01-4 Yes Yes Yes Yes 1.68E-01 CA 5.59E+00 1.47E-01
Is Target
Groundwater
Concentration
< MCL?
(Cgw < MCL?)
Pure Phase
Vapor
Concentration
Cvp\
(25 ℃)\
(µg/m3)
Maximum
Groundwater
Vapor
Concentration
Chc\
(µg/m3)
Temperature
for Maximum
Groundwater
Vapor
Concentration
(℃)
Lower
Explosive
Limit
LEL
(%
by
volume)
LEL
Ref
IUR
(ug/m 3)-1
IUR
Ref
RfC
(mg/m3)
RfC
Ref
Mutagenic
Indicator
Carcinogenic
VISL
TCR=1E-06
Cia,c(µg/m3)
Noncarcinogenic
VISL
THQ=0.1
Cia,nc(µg/m3)
No (5)1.65E+08 1.49E+08 25 -2.60E-07 I 4.00E-02 I No 1.08E+01 4.17E+00
Yes (2)1.00E+10 1.00E+10 25 3.60 CRC 4.40E-06 I 1.00E-01 I Mut 1.68E-01 1.04E+01
Output generated 08JUN2023:16:53:33
Resident Vapor Intrusion Risk 3
Chemical
CAS
Number
Site
Sub-Slab and
Exterior Soil
Gas
Concentration
Csg\
(µg/m3)
Site
Indoor Air
Concentration
Ci,a\
(µg/m3)
VI
Carcinogenic
Risk
CDI
(µg/m3)
VI
Carcinogenic
Risk
CR
VI
Hazard
CDI
(mg/m3)
VI
Hazard
HQ
IUR
(ug/m 3)-1
IUR
Ref
Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4 105 3.15E+00 1.12E+00 2.92E-07 3.02E-03 7.55E-02 2.60E-07 I
Vinyl Chloride 75-01-4 3.6 1.08E-01 1.46E-01 6.44E-07 1.04E-04 1.04E-03 4.40E-06 I
*Sum ---9.36E-07 -7.65E-02 -
Chronic
RfC
(mg/m 3)
RfC
Ref
Temperature
(℃)\
for
Groundwater
Vapor
Concentration Mutagen?
4.00E-02 IRIS 25 No
1.00E-01 IRIS 25 Mut
--
Output generated 08JUN2023:16:53:33
Chemical Properties 4
Chemical
CAS
Number
Does the
chemical
meet
the
definition
for
volatility?
(HLC>1E-5
or VP>1)
Does the
chemical
have
inhalation
toxicity
data?
(IUR
and/or
RfC)MW
MW
Ref
Vapor
Pressure
VP
(mm Hg)
VP
Ref
S
(mg/L)
S
Ref
MCL
(ug/L)
Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4 Yes Yes 165.83 PHYSPROP 1.85E+01 PHYSPROP 2.06E+02 PHYSPROP 5
Vinyl Chloride 75-01-4 Yes Yes 62.50 PHYSPROP 2.98E+03 EPI 8.80E+03 PHYSPROP 2
HLC
(atm-m 3/mole)
Henry's
Law
Constant
(unitless)
H` and HLC
Ref
Henry's
Law
Constant
Used in
Calcs
(unitless)
Normal
Boiling
Point
BP
(K)
BP
Ref
Critical
Temperature
TC\
(K)
TC\
Ref
Enthalpy of
vaporization
at
the normal
boiling point
ΔHv,b\
(cal/mol)
ΔHv,b\
Ref
Lower
Explosive
Limit
LEL
(%
by
volume)
LEL
Ref
1.77E-02 7.24E-01 PHYSPROP 7.24E-01 394.45 PHYSPROP 6.20E+02 YAWS 8288.72 CRC -
2.78E-02 1.14E+00 PHYSPROP 1.14E+00 259.85 PHYSPROP 4.25E+02 CRC 4971.32 CRC 3.60 CRC
Output generated 08JUN2023:16:59:03
Commercial Air Inputs 1
Variable
Commercial
Air
Default
Value
Site-Specific
Value
AFgw (Attenuation Factor Groundwater) unitless 0.001 0.001
AFss (Attenuation Factor Sub-Slab) unitless 0.03 0.03
ATcom (averaging time - composite worker)365 365
EDcom (exposure duration - composite worker) yr 25 25
EFcom (exposure frequency - composite worker) day/yr 250 250
ETcom (exposure time - composite worker) hr 8 8
THQ (target hazard quotient) unitless 0.1 0.1
LT (lifetime) yr 70 70
TR (target risk) unitless 1.0E-06 1.0E-06
Output generated 08JUN2023:16:59:03
Commercial Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels (VISL)2
Key: I = IRIS; P = PPRTV; O = OPP; A = ATSDR; C = Cal EPA; X = PPRTV Screening Level; H = HEAST; D = DWSHA; W = TEF applied; E = RPF applied;
U = user provided; G = see RSL User's Guide Section 5; CA = cancer; NC = noncancer.
Chemical
CAS
Number
Does the
chemical
meet
the
definition
for
volatility?
(HLC>1E-5
or VP>1)
Does the
chemical
have
inhalation
toxicity
data?
(IUR
and/or
RfC)
Is Chemical
Sufficiently
Volatile and Toxic
to
Pose Inhalation
Risk
Via Vapor
Intrusion
from Soil
Source?
(Cvp > Ci,a,Target?)
Is Chemical
Sufficiently
Volatile and Toxic
to
Pose Inhalation
Risk
Via Vapor
Intrusion from
Groundwater
Source?
(Chc > Ci,a,Target?)
Target
Indoor Air
Concentration
(TCR=1E-06
or THQ=0.1)
MIN(Cia,c,Cia,nc)
(µg/m3)
Toxicity
Basis
Target
Sub-Slab and
Near-source
Soil Gas
Concentration
(TCR=1E-06
or THQ=0.1)
Csg,Target
(µg/m3)
Target
Groundwater
Concentration
(TCR=1E-06
or THQ=0.1)
Cgw ,Target
(µg/L)
Is Target
Groundwater
Concentration
< MCL?
(Cgw < MCL?)
Chloroform 67-66-3 Yes Yes Yes Yes 5.33E-01 CA 1.78E+01 3.55E+00 Yes (80)
Toluene 108-88-3 Yes Yes Yes Yes 2.19E+03 NC 7.30E+04 8.07E+03 No (1000)
Pure Phase
Vapor
Concentration
Cvp\
(25 ℃)\
(µg/m3)
Maximum
Groundwater
Vapor
Concentration
Chc\
(µg/m3)
Temperature
for Maximum
Groundwater
Vapor
Concentration
(℃)
Lower
Explosive
Limit
LEL
(%
by
volume)
LEL
Ref
IUR
(ug/m 3)-1
IUR
Ref
RfC
(mg/m3)
RfC
Ref
Mutagenic
Indicator
Carcinogenic
VISL
TCR=1E-06
Cia,c(µg/m3)
Noncarcinogenic
VISL
THQ=0.1
Cia,nc(µg/m3)
1.26E+09 1.19E+09 25 -2.30E-05 U 9.77E-02 U No 5.33E-01 4.28E+01
1.41E+08 1.43E+08 25 1.10 U -5.00E+00 U No -2.19E+03
Output generated 08JUN2023:16:59:03
Commercial Vapor Intrusion Risk 3
Chemical
CAS
Number
Site
Sub-Slab and
Exterior Soil
Gas
Concentration
Csg\
(µg/m3)
Site
Indoor Air
Concentration
Ci,a\
(µg/m3)
VI
Carcinogenic
Risk
CDI
(µg/m3)
VI
Carcinogenic
Risk
CR
VI
Hazard
CDI
(mg/m 3)
VI
Hazard
HQ
IUR
(ug/m3)-1
IUR
Ref
Chronic
RfC
(mg/m3)
RfC
Ref
Temperature
(℃)\
for
Groundwater
Vapor
Concentration Mutagen?
Chloroform 67-66-3 7.68 2.30E-01 1.88E-02 4.32E-07 5.26E-05 5.38E-04 2.30E-05 U 9.77E-02 U 25 No
Toluene 108-88-3 30.5 9.15E-01 7.46E-02 -2.09E-04 4.18E-05 -5.00E+00 U 25 No
*Sum ---4.32E-07 -5.80E-04 ---
Output generated 08JUN2023:16:59:03
Chemical Properties 4
Chemical
CAS
Number
Does the
chemical
meet
the
definition
for
volatility?
(HLC>1E-5
or VP>1)
Does the
chemical
have
inhalation
toxicity
data?
(IUR
and/or
RfC)MW
MW
Ref
Vapor
Pressure
VP
(mm Hg)
VP
Ref
S
(mg/L)
S
Ref
MCL
(ug/L)
HLC
(atm-m 3/mole)
Henry's
Law
Constant
(unitless)
H`
and
HLC
Ref
Chloroform 67-66-3 Yes Yes 119.38 U 1.97E+02 U 7.95E+03 U 80 3.67E-03 1.50E-01 U
Toluene 108-88-3 Yes Yes 92.14 U 2.84E+01 U 5.26E+02 U 1000 6.64E-03 2.71E-01 U
Henry's
Law
Constant
Used in
Calcs
(unitless)
Normal
Boiling
Point
BP
(K)
BP
Ref
Critical
Temperature
TC\
(K)
TC\
Ref
Enthalpy of
vaporization
at
the normal
boiling point
ΔHv,b\
(cal/mol)
ΔHv,b\
Ref
Lower
Explosive
Limit
LEL
(%
by
volume)
LEL
Ref
1.50E-01 334.25 U 5.36E+02 U 6990.00 U -
2.71E-01 384.15 U 5.92E+02 U 7930.00 U 1.10 U

REFERENCE 30

SITE
PPE 1
PPE 2
SITE
PPE 1
PPE 2

REFERENCE 31

SITE
Catawba
River

REFERENCE 32

Oakda
l
eRdMtHollyRd
S
out
hP
o
i
ntRdSunsetRd
CharlotteDouglasInt'lAirport
Mt Holly
Belmont
Sedgefield
Hoskins
Shuffletown
Enderly Park
SugarCreek274
Westinghouse
B
lv
d
ST r y o n StPleasantRdHandsMillHwyHighway21BypNPineville
Lake Wylie
Sharonbrook
Starmount
801ft
A l bemarleR d
LawyersRdNGrahamStHarr isburgRdBlairRdO l dConcordRdR
a
n
dolphR
dR o c ky R iv e rRd
MonroeRd
CabarrusRd
B riefR dBeattiesFordRd S
a
mB
l
a
c
k
R
dLowerRockyRiverRdHarrisburg
NorthCharlotte
Idlewild
Grove Park
Pine Ridge
Mint Hill
Charlotte
ReaR d
ReaRdPr
o
vi
denceRdProvidenceRdMon
r
o
e
RdCarmelRdI
dlewil
dRd
IdlewildRdSardi
s
RdW
LawyersRd
M cKe e R d
NC-21
8
WPotterRdSelwyn Park
Indian Trail
Matthews
1930 Beatties Ford Rd, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28216
Natural Heritage Program Map
Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, City of Charlotte, NC, Esri, HERE, Garmin,
SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, USDA
North Carolina Boundary
Rivers
Lakes
Managed Areas
Dedicated Nature Preserve
Registered Heritage Area
Conservation Easement
Other Protection
Federal Ownership
State Ownership
Local Government Ownership
Private
March 30, 2023 0 3 61.5 mi
0 5 102.5 km
1:233,524

REFERENCE 33

SITE
PPE 1 PPE 2

REFERENCE 34

REFERENCE 35
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT Dry Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA) Compliance Program Inspection Report

Facility Identification
Peoples Cleaners Facility ID: 600017C EPA Generator ID: NCD986188084 County/FIPS: Mecklenburg/119 DSCA Cleanup ID: DC600006
Facility Data Peoples Cleaners 1930 Beatties Ford Road
Charlotte NC 28216 Lat: 35.261722 Long: -80.854583 SIC: 7216 / Dry Cleaning Plants, Except Rugs NAICS: 81232/ Dry Cleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) Date of Facility Establishment: 1/1/1990
Compliance Data Inspection Date: 6/16/2023 Time In: 10:00 AM Time Out: 10:20 AM Inspector(s): Ne’Shonda Cobbs Operating Status: OO/Operating Compliance Codes: In Violation of MMP Action Code: 01/Inspection
Contact Data Classification Data Service Type: Full Service (Closed) Solvent: System: N/A Installation Date: 2007 Installation Category: New Consumption Category: Small HW Generator Status: NA
Facility Contact
Quillie Smith 1930 Beatties Ford Rd. Charlotte, NC 28269 [phone]
Facility Owner
Quillie Smith 1930 Beatties Ford Rd. Charlotte, NC 28269 [phone]
Property Owner
Quillie Smith 1930 Beatties Ford Rd. Charlotte, NC 28269 [phone]
Inspector’s Signature:
Date of Signature: 6/16/2023
Comments:
Waste and equipment have been removed but the owner can’t provide details or records.

(I) DIRECTIONS: From the Mooresville Regional Office at 610 East Center Avenue in Mooresville, go west on East Center Avenue. Turn left onto S. Main St. (NC-152). Turn right onto W. McClelland Ave. (NC-152). Turn left onto NC-150. Merge onto I-77 South. Merge onto I-85 S via Exit 13B toward Spartanburg and take the Beatties Ford Rd. exit- (Exit 37). Turn right onto Beatties Ford Rd and the dry-cleaning facility is located on the left at 1930 Beatties Ford Road. (II) FACILITY HISTORY: Peoples Cleaners has been operated by Mr. Quillie Smith, since approximately 1990. Peoples Cleaners was previously a bakery and fish market (1985-1990), and a filling station from the 1950’s to around 1985. PCE/TCE contamination has been discovered on this property, and the site (60-0006) has been deferred to the Inactive
Hazardous Sites Branch. Mr. Smith explained that a fire had occurred at his store in March 2007. In 2012 the dry-cleaning operation became inactive and continued to function as a pick-up store. A site visit in June 2023 revealed that the machines had been removed at some point in 2022. Bennett's Ultra Cleaners clean garments on occasions that are dropped off at the
facility. Solvent History:
Solvent Dates Used
Perchloroethylene 1990 to 2022
Previous Inspections:
Date Visit Type Violation
Type(s)
Worst Violation(s) Action(s)
Taken
Response
Due
Received
Date
Inspector
6/8/2022 Inspection In Compliance N/A INF sent on 7/18/2022 8/8/2022 N/A or Not Rec'd Ne’Shonda Cobbs 1/6/2020 Inspection In Compliance N/A INF sent on 1/15/2020 2/5/2020 N/A or Not Rec'd Ne’Shonda Cobbs
CHKLST sent on 1/6/2020
8/16/2018 Follow up
Inspection
In
Compliance
N/A CHKLST
sent on 8/16/2018
None N/A or
Not Rec'd
Ne’Shonda
Cobbs
1/11/2018 Inspection MMP Inadequate spill containment, No spill containment (15-gal waste drums)
NOVNRE sent on 2/2/2018
2/23/2018 N/A or Not Rec'd Aram Kim
CHKLST sent on 1/11/2018
3/10/2016 Inspection MMP No spill containment
under four 15-gallon drums.
NOV sent
on 3/17/2016
4/8/2016 N/A or
Not Rec'd
Jack
Kitchen
CHKLST sent on 3/10/2016
3/5/2015 Inspection MMP No spill containment (specify) CHKLST sent on 3/6/2015
3/27/2015 N/A or Not Rec'd Jack Kitchen
8/22/2008 Inspection -- -- NOVNRE
sent on 9/10/2008
9/24/2008 9/23/2008 Alicia Roh
3/13/2007 Outreach Training Visit
-- -- CAL sent on 3/15/2007
4/2/2007 N/A or Not Rec'd Eric Swope
Complaints: None DSCA Sampling: None (III) FACILITY CLASSIFICATION: Dry Cleaning Equipment Summary
No Type of Machine Gen Manufacturer (Mfr) Model # Serial # Mfr Date Install Date End Date Solvent Used Observed Operating?
1 Dry-to-
Dry
3rd RealStar RS-260 60-B2-
171
-- -- 1/1/2012 Perchloroethylene removed
2 Dry-to-Dry 3rd Aero-Tech USA 410 -- -- 1/1/2007 12/31/2022 Perchloroethylene removed
(IV) INSPECTION SUMMARY: On June 16, 2023, Ne’Shonda Cobbs, compliance inspector, with the North Carolina
Division of Waste Management, Dry Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA) program conducted a compliance inspection at Peoples Cleaners. The inspector met with Mr. Quillie Smith, facility owner, who provided the inspector with access to the facility's equipment and available records.
The inspector arrived and found that Mr. Smith removed the dry-cleaning machine and possibly the waste as well. Mr. Smith stated that after he received the information letter in 2020, he decided to remove the machine and waste. The inspector
was not clear on who completed the machine removal, nor if the waste remained onsite or not. Mr. Smith stated that he removed the machine himself and didn’t have a mechanic or company do the removal. The inspector believes the machine has been taken to a local scrap yard being that it had previously not been operated in years. Mr. Smith couldn’t provide any details as to the name of the facility in which he took the machine. When the inspector tried to gain access to the rear of the facility where the waste had previously been stored, Mr. Smith stated that he cleared out the entire area. He stated that he got rid of the drums along with the machine. When the inspector inquired on how he got rid of the waste, he stated that the company out of GA took it. The inspector assumed based on previous site records and MCF being the company in the area from GA, that they disposed of his waste. Mr. Smith didn’t have any records to verify the removal. The inspector contacted MCF directly and was informed that the last time they removed waste from the facility was in 2019. The inspector also
checked with another major waste hauler in the area, and they had no records of a removal from the facility either. The owner is older and does not seem to understand fully or answer clearly when communicating. A CAL will be sent to the
facility requesting the disposal information and the location of the machine’s dump site. The inspector was only able to see the area that previously contained the machine, so the assumption that the waste has been removed is based on the owner’s communication. The owner didn’t allow entry into the rear of the facility and the condition of the rear is also unsafe from appearance. The inspector will continue to reach out to the owner to verify how the waste was removed, if at all. ***************See attached photos************ (V) CONCLUSIONS: Based on observations documented by the DSCA Inspector during the June 16, 2023, inspection, Peoples Cleaners is currently in violation of the following regulations: MMPs - 15A NCAC 02S.0202
(b)(1) Failure to maintain complete and current invoices for waste disposal [15A NCAC 02S.0202(b)(1)]. Waste manifests are required to be kept on site for three years and available for review.

NESHAP - 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart M NOTE: The Mecklenburg County Air Quality Program retains the authority to determine the facility's NESHAP compliance status.
None
RCRA- Hazardous Waste Regulations: 40 CFR Part 261 - 262 None
(VI) ENFORCEMENT HISTORY (Penalties): None (VII) PHOTOGRAPHS:
Picture 1: Store front of People’s Cleaners.

Picture 2: Area that previously contained dry-cleaning machine.

To: Quillie Smith, Owner
Peoples Cleaners (600017C)
1930 Beatties Ford Road Charlotte, NC 28216 From: Ne’Shonda Cobbs, Compliance Inspector
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ)
Division of Waste Management (DWM) Dry-Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA) Program Date: June 22, 2023

On June 16, 2023, a compliance inspection was conducted at your facility. At that time, the inspector observed that the waste and dry-cleaning equipment that had previously been onsite had been removed. The inspector attempted to confirm the waste hauler that removed your waste; however, the company name you provided stated that they did not remove the waste onsite. Please be reminded that maintaining the records for the
waste removal is a requirement. Please provide the records to show the manifest of the removal of the waste
drums from your facility. Also, even though solvent and/or equipment is no longer onsite, the records are to remain onsite for 5 years per DSCA requirements. Please note that the EPA also requires that they remain onsite for at least 3 years. If you could please include the disposal location of the dry-cleaning equipment as well.
At no time shall any dry-cleaning solvent, wastes containing dry-cleaning solvent, or water containing dry-cleaning solvent be discharged onto land or into waters of the State, sanitary sewers, storm drains, floor drains, septic systems, boilers, or cooling-towers.

Please submit a written response to the address below by July 13, 2023, with the requested information. Division of Waste Management
DSCA Compliance Program – Attn: Delonda Alexander
1646 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1646

Peoples Cleaners June 21, 2023
Page 2 of 2

We appreciate your immediate attention to these concerns. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the site visit on June 16, 2023. If you have any questions and/or concerns, please contact me at the number listed below.

Regards,
Ne’Shonda Cobbs 919-218-8409

REFERENCE 36

REFERENCE 37

From:Caldwell, Shawna
To:White, Jeffrey R
Subject:[External] RE: [External]RE: Well Records / Lab
Date:Wednesday, August 9, 2023 8:18:16 AM
Attachments:image001.png
221031010.pdf
220831005.pdf
220912022.pdf
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Report suspicious emails with the
Report Message button located on your Outlook menu bar on the Home tab.
Hi Jeffery,

I apologize for taking so long to get this to you, but I was trying to get better
information/documentation for you.

I have attached VOC sampling results for 1942 and 1948 Saint Mark Street. The well at 2235 Haines
ST had not been sampled at the time of your inquiry.

I have been trying to get the well records we discussed, but I have not been able to get copies of the
well construction record for the wells at 1942 and 1948 Saint Mark ST and 2235 Haines ST or the
abandonment record for 2204 Lasalle ST yet.

I did speak directly to the Mecklenburg County Environmental Specialists responsible for permitting
and inspecting the new well installations and the well abandonment. They indicated that they
personally inspected the grouting of the casing and the well head completion for the new wells at
1942 and 1948 Saint Mark ST and 2235 Haines ST and the grouting of the well at 2204 Lasalle ST for
permanent abandonment. All of these activities met the requirements of the permits according to
both 15A NCAC 2C Well Construction Standards and Mecklenburg County Groundwater Well
Regulations.

The well at 2235 Haines ST was installed in 2020. The wells at Saint Mark ST would have been
installed early Fall 2022. The well at 2204 Lasalle ST was permanently abandoned a few years ago.

The wells at 2235 Haines ST and 1942 and 1948 Saint Mark ST are all potable wells. The permits for
all three of these wells require that the well owner sample these wells every two years for VOCs and
report any detections to Mecklenburg County Groundwater and Wastewater Services (GWS). GWS
sends reminders when wells are due for the biannual sampling with an offer to complete the
sampling through our well testing program.

I requested that a sample be collected from the well at 2235 Haines ST, but the results are not yet
available.

Please let me know if you have questions or I can help otherwise. Thx! Have a great day.

Shawna W. Caldwell, PG
Hydrogeologist
Mecklenburg County Government
Groundwater and Wastewater Services
3205 Freedom Dr., Suite 8000
Charlotte, NC 28208
GWS Phone: [phone]
GWS Fax: [phone]
Direct Line: 980.314.1626
Cell Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message and any attachments included are from the
Mecklenburg County Health Department and are for sole use by the intended recipient(s). The
information contained herein may include confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized
review, forwarding, printing, copying, distributing, or using such information is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you received this message in error, or have reason to believe you are not
authorized to receive it, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the
original message. Thank you!

From: White, Jeffrey R <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 3:07 PM
To: Caldwell, Shawna <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External]RE: Well Records / Lab

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Good afternoon Shawna,

I was just following up on the VOC laboratory results for the WSW’s located at Saint Mark Street we
discussed over the phone a while back related to the People’s Cleaner’s site at 1930 Beatties Ford
Road.

We are wrapping up the report and although not necessary to include, it would be helpful if we
could include them for any potential future assessment/evaluation.

Thank you and feel free to call me any time.

Jeffrey R. White
Hydrogeologist, Federal Remediation Branch
Superfund Section, Division of Waste Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
New Office Number:
[phone]
New Email Address:
[e-mail]

DEQ is updating its email addresses to @deq.nc.gov
Employee email addresses may look different, but email performance will not be impacted.

From: White, Jeffrey R
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2023 12:20 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Well Records / Lab

Hi Shawna,

I noticed I requested the wrong address for the well laboratory results and GW-1 form in my
previous email.

The address is 1942 and 1948 Saint Mark Street.

Please let me know if you or anyone else is able to assist with this as we may need to put this on our
workplan for sampling if not.

Thank you,

Jeffrey R. White
Hydrogeologist, Federal Remediation Branch
Superfund Section, Division of Waste Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
New Office Number:
[phone]
New Email Address:
[e-mail]

DEQ is updating its email addresses to @deq.nc.gov
Employee email addresses may look different, but email performance will not be impacted.

From: White, Jeffrey R
Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2023 2:00 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Well Records / Lab

Good afternoon Shawna,

My name is Jeffrey and I’m working on a Pre-CERCLA Screening (PCS) Assessment related to the
Peoples Cleaners site located at 1930 Beatties Ford Road, Charlotte, NC.

I have a few questions about some new water supply wells within the study area of the site
regarding potential receptors/contaminant pathways.

I was able to pull up the records for the two wells located at 1929 & 1933 Saint Paul Street, however,
I was unable to find the laboratory results. Do you have access to these and the actual drillers well
records? These would be the closest downgradient wells to the Peoples Cleaners site and would be
conducive for me to document and include in the assessment.

The assessment has mostly focused on the subsurface intrusion pathway of adjacent properties to
the site; however, we do look at all potential pathways.

I was also unable to pull up the well records for the properties listed below to confirm if they were
drinking water wells:

- 1929 & 1933 Saint Paul Street (new construction)
- 2235 Haines Street (new construction)
- 2204 Lasalle Street (appears abandoned)

Please feel free to give me a call if it would be easier to discuss. I can also provide you with the PCS
report once finalized. Any help would be much appreciated!

Jeffrey R. White
Hydrogeologist, Federal Remediation Branch
Superfund Section, Division of Waste Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
New Office Number:
[phone]
New Email Address:
[e-mail]

From:Caldwell, Shawna
To:White, Jeffrey R
Subject:RE: [External] RE: [External]RE: Well Records / Lab
Date:Monday, September 18, 2023 12:15:36 PM
Attachments:image001.png
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Report suspicious emails with the
Report Message button located on your Outlook menu bar on the Home tab.
Yes, these wells have been installed and are active drinking water wells. Pls let me know if you need
more info. Thx! Have a great day.

Shawna W. Caldwell, PG
Senior Hydrogeologist
Mecklenburg County Government
Groundwater and Wastewater Services
3205 Freedom Dr., Suite 8000
Charlotte, NC 28208
GWS Phone: [phone]
GWS Fax: [phone]
Direct Line: 980.314.1626
Cell Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message and any attachments included are from the
Mecklenburg County Health Department and are for sole use by the intended recipient(s). The
information contained herein may include confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized
review, forwarding, printing, copying, distributing, or using such information is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you received this message in error, or have reason to believe you are not
authorized to receive it, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the
original message. Thank you!

From: White, Jeffrey R <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 12:36 PM
To: Caldwell, Shawna <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: [External]RE: Well Records / Lab

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hey Shawna,

Thanks again for all your help. I just have one more quick question.

We may have discussed it on the phone, but I just wanted to double check.

Did we confirm the status of the two wells at 1929 & 1933 Saint Paul Street (new construction)?

REFERENCE 38

REFERENCE 39