6301_MooreCounty_MSWLF_CAER_FID1809532_20230619

*ENR USE ONLY• I I ❑Paper Report ❑Electronic Data - Email CD (data loaded: Yes / No Doc/Event #:
NC DENR I IEnvironmental Monitoring
Division of Waste Management - Solid Waste Reporting Form
Notice: This form and any information attached to it are "Public Records" as defined in NC General Statute 132-1. As such, these documents are
available for inspection and examination by any person upon request (NC General Statute 132-6).
Instructions:
• Prepare one form for each individually monitored unit.
• Please type or print legibly.
• Attach a notification table with values that attain or exceed NC 2L groundwater standards or NC 2B surface water standards. The notification
must include a preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of each value. (e.g. naturally occurring, off -site source, pre-existing
condition, etc.).
• Attach a notification table of any groundwater or surface water values that equal or exceed the reporting limits.
• Attach a notification table of any methane gas values that attain or exceed explosive gas levels. This includes any structures on or nearby the
facility (NCAC 13B .1629 (4)(a)(i).
• Send the original signed and sealed form, any tables, and Electronic Data Deliverable to: Compliance Unit, NCDENR-DWM, Solid Waste
Section, 1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1646.
Solid Waste Monitoring Data Submittal Information
Name of entity submitting data (laboratory, consultant, facility owner):
S&ME, Inc. (Consultant for Moore County)
Contact for questions about data formatting. Include data preparer's name, telephone number and E-mail address:
Name: Edmund Q.B.
E-mail: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
NC Landfill Rule: Actual sampling dates (e.g.,
Facility name: Facility Address: Facility Permit # (0500 or .1600) October 20-24, 2006)
Moore County Landfill 456 Turning Leaf Way, 63-01 .0500 NA
Aberdeen, North Carolina 28315
Environmental Status: (Check all that apply)
Initial/Background Monitoring Detection Monitoring Assessment Monitoring O Corrective Action
of data submitted: (Check all that apply)
Groundwater monitoring data from monitoring wells
Groundwater monitoring data from private water supply wells
Leachate monitoring data Surface water monitoring data x
Methane gas monitoring data
Corrective action data (specify) Monitored Natural Attenuation Data
Other(specify)
CAER Report
Notification attached?
B No. No groundwater or surface water standards were exceeded.
Yes, a notification of values exceeding a groundwater or surface water standard is attached. It includes a list of groundwater and surface water
monitoring points, dates, analytical values, NC 2L groundwater standard, NC 2B surface water standard or NC Solid Waste GWPS and
preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of any concentration.
Yes, a notification of values exceeding an explosive methane gas limit is attached. It includes the methane monitoring points, dates, sample
values and explosive methane gas limits.
Certification
To the best of my knowledge, the information reported and statements made on this data submittal and attachments are true and correct.
Furthermore, I have attached complete notification of any sampling values meeting or exceeding groundwater standards or explosive gas
levels, and a preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of concentrations exceeding groundwater standards. I am aware that there
are significant penalties for making any false statement, representation, or certification including the possibility of a fine and imprisonment.
Edmund Q.B. Henriques, PG Senior Geologist / S&ME, Inc. 336-312-3330
Facility Representative Name (Print) Title (Area Code) Telephor
C n n /1 n f� 6/15/2023 Affix NC
Signature
8646 W. Market Street, Suite 105, Greensboro NC 27409
Facility Representative Address
F-0176
NC PE Firm License Number (if applicable effective May 1, 2009)
Revised 6/2009
Date
Geologist Seal
4
a
121� m
4 t m
a�q�s«naP u�yta®r

PREPARED FOR:
Moore County
703 Pinehurst Avenue
Carthage, NC 28327
PREPARED BY:
S&ME, Inc.
8646 West Market Street, Suite 105
Greensboro, NC 27409
June 15, 2023

June 15, 2023
Moore County
703 Pinehurst Avenue
Carthage, NC 28327
Attention: Mr. Steve Perkins transmitted by email to: [e-mail]
Reference: Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Dear Mr. Perkins:
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) has prepared this Corrective Action Evaluation Report for the Moore County Landfill in
accordance with Contract Amendment #5 dated April 22, 2022. On behalf of Moore County, this report will be
submitted electronically to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Waste
Management, Solid Waste Section (NCDEQ). If you have any questions regarding this report and associated
findings, please contact your Project Manager, Edmund Henriques.
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
Cody A. McMechem, G.I.T.
Environmental Staff Professional
Edmund Q.B. Henriques, L.G.
Project Manager / Principal Geologist
cc. Jaclynne Drummond, NCDEQ, transmitted electronically to [e-mail]
S&ME, Inc. 18646 West Market Street, Suite 105 1 Greensboro, NC 27409 1 p 336.288.7180 1 www.smeinc.com

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill �R
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D I
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction.......................................................................................................................1
1.1 Site Description and Background.................................................................................................1
1.2 Compliance Monitoring History.................................................................................................. 2
1.3 Regulatory Status........................................................................................................................... 5
1.4 Aquifer Characteristics.................................................................................................................. 6
1.5 Contaminant Distribution............................................................................................................. 7
1.6 Description of Site Conceptual Model......................................................................................... 8
2.0 Corrective Action Summary............................................................................................9
2.1 Physical and Chemical Changes In the Aquifer and Plume Characteristics ..........................9
2.1.1 Aromatic Compounds.....................................................................................................................10
2.1.2 Aliphatic Compounds......................................................................................................................10
2.1.3 Geochemistry...................................................................................................................................11
2.1.4 131OCHLOR Model.........................................................................................................................13
2.1.5 Trends in Contaminant Concentrations.........................................................................................14
2.2 Refining the Conceptual Model..................................................................................................16
2.3 Corrective Action Method Evaluation.......................................................................................17
2.4 Impacts At The Compliance Boundary and Off -Site Migration............................................18
3.0 Conclusions and Recommendations...........................................................................19
4.0 Refences............................................................................................................................20
List of Figures
Figure 1 — Site Location
Figure 2 — Groundwater Elevation Contour Map October 2022 Monitoring Event
Figure 3 — Total VOC Isoconcentration Map, December 2017 Monitoring Event
Figure 4 — Total VOC Isoconcentration Map, October 2018 Monitoring Event
Figure 5 — Total VOC Isoconcentration Map, October 2019 Monitoring Event
Figure 6 — Total VOC Isoconcentration Map, October 2020 Monitoring Event
Figure 7 — Total VOC Isoconcentration Map, October 2021 Monitoring Event
Figure 8 — Total VOC Isoconcentration Map, October 2022 Monitoring Event
Figure 9 — Current 2L Standard Exceedances, October 2022 Monitoring Event
Figure 10— Current 2L Standard Exceedance and Cross -Sections A -A' and B-B'
Figure 11 — Potential Water Well Receptors'
June 15, 2023

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
List of Tables
s
0
Table 1 —Active Monitoring Well Construction Information
Table 2 — Groundwater Elevation Data — October 2022
Table 3 — Summary of Estimated Horizontal Velocities
Table 4 — Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
Table 5 — Record of Surface Water Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
Table 6 — Historic Methane Readings at Gas Compliance Points and Vents GV-33, GV-34, GV-35 & GV-36
Table 7 — Summary of Constituents of Concern
Table 8 — Record of Groundwater Field Parameters
Table 9 — Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results — MNA Parameters
Appendices
Appendix I — Well Logs
Appendix II — Natural Attenuation Screening Protocol Forms
Appendix III — BIOCHLOR Model
Appendix IV — Time vs Concentration Charts
Appendix V — Mann -Kendall Statistics
June 15, 2023

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill .�
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
1.0 Introduction
This Corrective Action Evaluation Report (CAER) was prepared for Moore County (the County) by S&ME, Inc.
(S&ME) for the Moore County Landfill, North Carolina Solid Waste Permit No. 61-03. This CAER was prepared in
accordance with the guidance document "Guidelines for Corrective Action Evaluation Reports" issued by the NC
Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) formerly known as the North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources.
1.1 Site Description and Background
The Moore County Landfill (the "facility") is located at 456 Turning Leaf Way in Aberdeen, North Carolina as shown
on Figure 1. The facility is owned and operated by Moore County under Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01 issued by
the NCDEQ-SWS. The facility encompasses approximately 314 acres and contains a municipal solid waste (MSW)
transfer facility, a closed unlined MSW landfill and an active C&D landfill. The closed unlined MSW Landfill is
located on the eastern side of the facility (comprising approximately 60 acres) and the active Construction and
Demolition (C&D) Landfill is located on the western side of the facility. Several smaller Land Clearing and Inert
Debris (LCID) landfill units are also present at the facility.
The facility is bound to the west by Horse Creek and to the north and south by unnamed tributaries of Horse
Creek. A power -line right-of-way transects the property and represents the eastern boundary of the closed MSW
landfill. Topographic surface elevations at the facility range from approximately 460 feet above mean sea level
(AMSL) along the eastern portion of the closed MSW landfill to approximately 350 feet AMSL on the southwestern
side of the facility. The site is surrounded by wooded, agricultural, or rural residential properties.
The Moore County MSW landfill began accepting solid waste in 1968 and stopped accepting waste before
October 9, 1993. The landfill was capped and closed to avoid Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
Subtitle D regulations under the NCAC 1313.1600 rules. The final closure was approved by NCDEQ in December
1996 and the County expressed their intent to comply with post -closure monitoring regulations in January 1997.
In 1993, a transfer station was constructed at the facility to handle the County's solid waste stream. In September
of 1993, Moore County entered into an agreement with Uwharrie Environmental, Inc. which later became Republic
Services of North Carolina, LLC, granting the private company operation responsibilities at its transfer station.
After closure of the MSW landfill in 1993, the County opened a C&D landfill under the existing solid waste permit
#63-01. The County temporarily stockpiled C&D waste from approximately 1993 to 1996, until the current landfill
C&D landfill was permitted and constructed. The County manages the C&D and LCID waste streams generated
within Moore County and operates the C&D landfill.
S&ME understands that at the request of the NCDEQ, the facility voluntarily commenced a corrective action
program, specifically Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA), due to groundwater impacts from volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) at the closed unlined MSW landfill. The County also monitors water quality at the active C&D
landfill in accordance with Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) 1313. 0600 and the facility's
approved modified Water Quality Monitoring Plan (WQMP).
June 15, 2023

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill �r
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D I
1.2 Compliance Monitoring History
The MSW landfill was originally monitored by five monitoring wells which were installed in June 1987. The original
MSW landfill monitoring network consisted of MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, and MW-5. Monitoring wells MW-1,
MW-2, MW-3, and MW-4 were used as the downgradient monitoring wells and MW-5 (side gradient of the MSW
landfill) was used as the background well. The five original monitoring wells were located with the anticipation of
expanding the MSW landfill; however, prior to the promulgation of the Subtitle D regulations, the County closed
the MSW landfill. The County constructed the currently active C&D landfill to the west and down -gradient of the
closed MSW landfill. Since the monitoring wells MW-3 and MW-4 are downgradient of the active C&D facility,
monitoring wells MW-6 through MW-9 were added in March 1995 to monitor the area between the MSW and
C&D facilities. Monitoring well MW-10 was also added to the monitoring network in March 1995 to monitor the
groundwater down -gradient of the C&D landfill.
Because the MSW landfill closed in October 1993, the County monitored the closed MSW landfill under the 15A
NCAC 13B. 0600 Rules. Due to detections of VOCs in samples from monitoring wells downgradient of the closed
MSW landfill and concerns of off -site migration expressed by the NCDEQ in January 1996, the County voluntarily
proceeded with groundwater corrective action. In September 1996, additional monitoring wells were installed at
the facility in an effort to delineate the horizontal and vertical extent of contamination, and to serve as monitoring
points for the newly constructed C&D facility. The additional monitoring wells included MW-11S/D, MW-12S/D,
MW-13S/D, MW-14, and MW-15. Monitoring wells MW-16S/D were later installed to replace MW-12S/D during
an expansion of the C&D facility. A private water supply well at the Blake residence (PW-1), which is located
upgradient of the facility, was added to the monitoring network in 1996, along with surface water monitoring
points (SW-1 and SW-2). Following the approval of the CAER submitted in May 2012, two additional surface water
monitoring points were added in order to better assess surface water quality and potential plume migration at the
site. In October 2012, surface water points SW-3 and SW-4 were added to the compliance monitoring network
and were sampled for the first time.
In a letter dated October 6, 1999, the NCDEQ, in a response to low-level VOC detections and exceedances of
methane above the lower explosive limit (LEL) along the northern property line, requested that the County
perform a water quality assessment and explosive gas study in accordance with 15A NCAC 13B. 0402(3) to
delineate the extent of VOC impacts to groundwater and the possibility of methane gas crossing the property line.
A "Methane and Groundwater Quality Assessment Report" was submitted with an addendum to NCDEQ in
December of 2000. In this report, HDR identified a confining unit at depth, which was reported to limit vertical
groundwater contamination. In January 2005, NCDEQ requested that Moore County complete an Assessment of
Corrective Measures (ACM) and select a remedy in accordance with 15A NCAC 2L .0106. HDR submitted the ACM
in July 2005 with MNA as the primary proposed remedy with a contingency plan for active Landfill Gas (LFG)
remediation if one or more of the following criteria were met:
An increasing trend in contaminant concentrations was not originally predicted during remedy selection.
Large increases in contaminant concentration in near -source wells are indicative of a new release.
Identification of contaminants in monitoring wells located outside the original plume boundary.
Evidence that contaminants may reach a receptor or other media (e.g., surface water) not previously
expected to be reached.
Contaminant concentrations are not decreasing rapidly enough to achieve the remediation objectives.
Changes in surrounding land and/or groundwater which may adversely affect the protectiveness of MNA.
June 15, 2023

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
ICI_
NCDEQ approved the recommendations in the ACM on November 21, 2005; however, they did not require a
public hearing, as this was not required for this facility under the applicable regulations (HDR, 2005).
A revised WQMP was prepared in July 2006 and approved October 13, 2006, by NCDEQ. This Plan includes
monitoring of NC Appendix I VOCs and RCRA metals for all groundwater and surface water monitoring points, as
well as "performance monitoring" (i.e., MNA) parameters for selected wells. In a letter from the NCDEQ dated April
18, 2008, Moore County received permission to eliminate hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and volatile fatty acids from
the semi-annual monitoring list, and complete groundwater modeling annually. This letter also specified that the
County would collect the full suite of "performance monitoring parameters" in April and October 2011, and
present a MNA CAER after completion of the October 2011 water quality monitoring event (WQME). The first
MNA CAER was submitted to the NCDEQ on May 15, 2012, and in a letter dated August 30, 2012, the NCDEQ
granted the County permission to continue MNA for another five-year period at the end of which the County is
required to submit another CAER (after the 2016 sampling events).
On May 16, 2013, Joyce Engineering, Inc. submitted Contingency Plan Update and Implementation Plan - Revised
which was approved by NCDEQ June 5, 2013. Three passive gas vents (GV-30, GV-31, and GV-32) were installed in
February 2014. As a follow up to the installation of the passive gas vents a Contingency Plan Update Evaluation
was submitted by Golder on March 16, 2015. In the Contingency Plan Update Evaluation letter, the County
requested more time to assess the effectiveness of the passive gas vents. A meeting was held on March 10, 2016,
to discuss the groundwater trends at the site and the effectiveness of the passive gas vents. During this meeting,
Golder indicated it appeared that groundwater VOC concentration trends over time were declining. At this
meeting and in a correspondence dated March 14, 2016, NCDEQ indicated that an Alternate Source
Demonstration (ASD) would be required to address groundwater impacts in the C&D landfill monitoring wells.
Since the beginning of the 2005 ACM activities, it was inferred that the VOC impacts in groundwater samples from
C&D monitoring wells were due to the MSW landfill, as impacts were noted during the initial sampling event at
the C&D facility.
In two letters dated September 28, 2017, the NCDEQ-SWS indicated that they would not approve the ASD for
VOCs at the C&D Landfill, at that time. They also requested that Moore County implement landfill gas and
groundwater corrective action at the closed MSW landfill; and commence assessment monitoring at the C&D
landfill pursuant to 15A NCAC 13B .0545. On December 6, 2017, after additional communications and a meeting
with NCDEQ-SWS, Moore County submitted a letter confirming their intention to comply with the NCDEQ-SWS
requests and requested an extension to comply, which was approved by NCDEQ-SWS on December 11, 2017.
On behalf of Moore County, Golder submitted:
CAER dated October 16, 2017,
Assessment Monitoring Work Plan, dated January 5, 2018.
Landfill Gas Remediation Plan dated January 31, 2018,
Groundwater Corrective Action Milestone Schedule, dated January 31, 2018 (which included the submission
of the NC Solid Waste .0500 Groundwater Corrective Action Application), and
In accordance with Golder's Assessment Monitoring Work Plan, dated January 5, 2018, monitoring wells MW-11 SR,
MW-11 DR, and MW-15R were subsequently installed to replace monitoring wells MW-11 S, MW-11 D, and MW-15.
The replacement wells were sampled in June 2018, as part of the first assessment monitoring event for the C&D
June 15, 2023

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill .�
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
landfill. Groundwater samples collected from assessment monitoring wells were analyzed for constituents listed in
North Carolina Appendix II and the C&D landfill indicator parameters required by NCDEQ-SWS (e.g., chloride,
manganese, sulfate, iron, alkalinity, total dissolved solids (TDS), and tetrahydrofuran). Samples from monitoring
wells MW-6 and MW-7 were also analyzed for Appendix II constituents, to further assess whether the
groundwater impacts detected at the C&D landfill were attributable to the upgradient MSW landfill.
In a letter dated February 22, 2018, NCDEQ approved a request made by Moore County to decommission
monitoring wells MW-16S and MW-16D and replace them in the groundwater monitoring network with MW-175,
MW-17D, and MW-18 which were to be installed in conjunction with the permitting of new Cell VI of the C&D
landfill. Between May 31 and June 4, 2018, monitoring wells MW-175, MW-17D, and MW-18 were installed, and
monitoring wells MW-16S and MW-16D were properly abandoned. Monitoring wells MW-17S and MW-17D were
first sampled during the routine semi-annual monitoring event conducted during November 2019. Monitoring
well MW-18 was first sampled during the routine semi-annual monitoring event conducted in April 2020.
During the April 2020 water quality monitoring event, groundwater monitoring was conducted at the closed MSW
landfill in accordance with the approved Water Quality Monitoring Plan and Phase I of the Groundwater Corrective
Action Milestone Schedule which was approved by NCDEQ-SWS on February 13, 2018. Phase I of the Groundwater
Corrective Action Milestone Schedule included the following activities:
Installation of the methane cut-off trench to the south of MW-15 (completed November 2, 2078)
Replacement of MW-15 with MW-15R (completed June 1, 2018)
Conversion of MW-15 to compliance methane monitoring well GP-18 (completed December 7, 2018)
Continuation of MNA (as detailed in the approved Water Quality Monitoring Plan)
In accordance with the approved Water Quality Monitoring Plan, dated December 10, 2019, hereafter referred to
as the WQMP, monitoring wells in the MSW compliance network are corrective action MNA monitoring wells and
are currently analyzed for VOCs listed in North Carolina Appendix I, RCRA metals, and an approved suite of MNA
parameters (which includes chloride, ethane, ethene, methane, nitrate, sulfate, sulfide, total alkalinity, and total
organic carbon). In addition, active C&D monitoring wells MW-4, MW-5, and MW-11SR are also sampled as
corrective action MNA monitoring wells and analyzed for the same suite of MNA parameters.
Analytical results for the April 2020 water quality monitoring event detected benzene at a concentration of 1.6
pg/L in monitoring well MW-18. Based on this apparent exceedance of the corresponding 2L Standard, a
verification sampling event was conducted on June 5, 2020, with laboratory analyses reporting 1.2 pg/L Benzene.
Based on the verified exceedance of the 2L Standard for benzene, an update of the Assessment Monitoring
Program was required. On June 26, 2020, new monitoring well MW-19 was installed down -gradient (in the
direction of contaminant migration) of monitoring well MW-18, near the facility boundary. Monitoring well MW-
19 was first sampled during October 2020, then monitored semi-annually thereafter. To date, benzene has not
been detected at monitoring well MW-19.
The facility is currently performing Phase I corrective measures, which include NCDEQ approved LFG remedies and
groundwater remedies. Phase I remedies included installation of the methane cut-off trench near GP-18 and
continuation of MNA for groundwater. The methane cut-off trench installed in 2018 was to serve dual purposes.
The trench targeted reduction of the LEL conditions observed at GP-18. The local increase in venting of LFG could
June 15, 2023 4

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill .�
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
theoretically improve groundwater quality in the vicinity of MW-15R, by increasing the transfer of VOCs in LFG to
the atmosphere, rather than to underlying groundwater.
On behalf of Moore County, S&ME conducted additional site investigations focused on advancing knowledge of
existing site conditions. As presented in S&ME's Waste Extents and Soil Cover System Thickness Assessment Report,
dated June 30, 2022, and Landfill Gas Vent Installation Report, dated June 30, 2022, facility engineering controls
that hold a potential to reduce contaminant mass transfers from landfill waste to groundwater, were considered
for their potential contributions to long-term management of groundwater quality. S&ME performed limited
assessments of the MSW landfill cover soil thickness, cover system surface topography, and waste extents. The
relevant assessment findings include:
The MSW cover system soils were observed to consist of three or more feet of soil, likely locally derived,
overlying historically placed solid waste. Generally speaking, the observed soil cover system thickness was
reasonable for a landfill closed during the early 1990s.
A review of MSW landfill topography using 2021 site LIDAR survey data identified various subtle
topographic low areas, likely related to settlement of waste over time. Several topographic low areas
correlated with areas of observed temporary water ponding. With this information, Moore County
initiated placement and grading of clean fill soils in select low areas, with a goal of improving positive
storm drainage off the cover system. Restoring positive surface drainage off the landfill is expected to
lessen water infiltration into the MSW waste and generation of landfill gas. Engineering controls that
lessen water infiltration into the waste should diminish contaminant mass transfers from waste to
groundwater, thereby enhancing the performance of MNA.
A Frequency Domain Electromagnetic (FDEM) survey was employed to assess the lateral extents of the
MSW landfill. The survey results found the extents to be similar to those historically depicted. The FDEM
survey did result in recognition of a natural earth partition between two MSW landfill waste units. Given
the sandy nature of site soils, this partition could represent a dominant local conduit for landfill gases
migrating out of the adjacent waste units, then migrating northward toward gas monitoring point GP-18,
the non -compliant northern property boundary monitoring point. It was hypothesized that installation of
gas vent wells within this presumed gas migration conduit should relieve subsurface gas pressures and
lessen the northward migration of landfill gases. In accordance with the NCDEQ approved Work Plan, new
passive gas vent wells GV-35 and GV-36 were installed on June 16, 2022, as part of a gas vent pilot test.
Quarterly landfill gas monitoring to date has indicated that these two new vent wells yield among the
highest methane gas readings recorded at the facility. The pilot test is on -going.
The October 2022 monitoring event included collection of samples for certain MNA analyses required for the five-
year review CAER report, to be submitted in 2023.
It is noted that several monitoring wells were replaced during this CAER 5-year review period. To simplify
discussion, monitoring wells that were replaced will be referred to herein by the current well name (i.e., MW-11 S =
MW-11 SR, MW-11 D = MW-11 DR, MW-13S = MW-13SR, MW-13D = MW-13DR, MW-15 = MW-15R.
1.3 Regulatory Status
As stated above, the Moore County MSW Landfill stopped accepting waste before October 9, 1993, and the
landfill was capped and closed by October 9, 1994; therefore, the facility was monitored under the 15A NCAC 13B
June 15, 2023

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
ICI_
.0500 rules. As described above in Section 1.2, the facility commenced a groundwater corrective action program,
specifically MNA, due to groundwater impacts from VOCs at the closed MSW landfill. In a letter dated April 18,
2008, NCDEQ requested that Moore County complete a MNA CAER after completion of the October 2011 WQME.
The first MNA CAER prepared by Golder was submitted to the NCDEQ on May 15, 2012, and in a letter dated
August 30, 2012, the NCDEQ granted the County permission to continue MNA for another five-year period at the
end of which the County was required to submit another CAER. The second MNA CAER dated October 16, 2017,
was prepared by Golder.
This MNA CAER covers water quality monitoring for the period December 2017 through October 2022.
1.4 Aquifer Characteristics
The facility is located within the Inner Coastal Plain Physiographic Province of North Carolina. The geologic units
of this region range in age from the Cretaceous Period to the Tertiary Period. Based on the North Carolina
Geologic Survey (NCGS) geologic map of North Carolina, the facility is underlain by sands, silts, and clays of the
Middendorf Formation, which generally consist of intercalated, lenticular, thick -bedded, light-colored sands and
clays (mudstones) with local concentrations of clay-clast conglomerates (NCGS, 1985 and Sohl, Norman, and
James, 1991). Prior assessment reports for the facility describe the subsurface mainly as silty sand (SM), poorly
sorted sand (SP), and well sorted sand (SW) inter -bedded with discontinuous silt (ML) and clay (CL) lenses as
defined by the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). The discontinuous silt and clay lenses varied in thickness
from one inch to several feet in facility borings. The lateral extents of these fine-grained lenses were not defined.
The boring logs for monitoring wells installed at the facility can be found in Appendix I. A summary of monitoring
well construction information is presented in Table 1.
The uppermost groundwater beneath the facility is a shallow, unconfined aquifer comprised of primarily of sands
mixed with relatively thin silt and clay seams. Beneath the facility, the uppermost aquifer is approximately 55 feet
thick and underlain by a clay confining layer (HDR, 2005). This water table aquifer is recharged by precipitation
infiltration, primarily in upland areas, with shallow groundwater discharging to local streams. Groundwater levels
vary seasonally, declining during the summer when atmospheric conditions favor evaporation and plants transpire
large amounts of water, and rising during the winter when plants are generally dormant.
The MSW and C&D landfill units are located in upland areas that generally slope downward to the south toward
Horse Creek. The waste management units occupy upland aquifer recharge areas. Water percolating through
daily cover soils or final cover soil system interacts with waste and generates leachate. Leachate will percolate
downward until it reaches the water table aquifer. Once leachate containing contaminants of concern (COC) enter
the aquifer, characteristics of their migration in the aquifer are primarily governed by hydraulic pressure gradients
and preferred flow paths within the aquifer media.
In general, surface water and groundwater at the facility flows to the west and southwest toward Horse Creek,
which is located along the western property boundary, representing the most significant local hydraulic boundary.
Relative to the MSW and C&D landfill units, a lesser component of groundwater flow is presumed to the north
and south toward adjacent minor unnamed tributaries of Horse Creek. Groundwater occurs at depths varying from
approximately 6 to 34 feet below ground surface across the facility. Measurements of groundwater elevations
obtained during the October 2022 monitoring event are summarized in Table 2 and were used to prepare a
groundwater surface contour map presented as Figure 2.
June 15, 2023

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D I
A review of groundwater elevations at well nests MW-11 SR/MW-11 DR and MW-1 3SR/MW-1 3DR indicated vertical
pressure gradients that suggest a relatively low downward flow component at these well locations. No nested
wells pairs exist at the Horse Creek margin; however, it is reasonable to assume that the uppermost aquifer would
exhibit an upward pressure gradient at Horse Creek, the most significant local hydraulic boundary.
In April 2005 during the ACM study conducted by HDR seventeen, (17) groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1,
MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, MW-5, MW-6, MW-7, MW-8, MW-9, MW-11S/D, MW-13S/D, MW-14, MW-15, and MW-
16S/D) were chosen to estimate of hydraulic conductivity for the upper aquifer sediments at the facility. Falling
and rising head tests were applied to calculate the hydraulic conductivity values for well screen intervals
representing the uppermost aquifer at the facility.
Relying upon the HDR data, groundwater velocities are calculated for each semi-annual water quality monitoring
event. Historically, an effective porosity of 0.35 was selected for the shallow aquifer at the site based on typical
effective porosity values for similar soil types (HDR, 2005). The Golder and S&ME groundwater elevation contour
maps prepared during this 5-year CAER review period were generally consistent with those previously submitted
by Golder and HDR.
Using site data collected, estimates for rates of groundwater flow for the uppermost aquifer beneath the
monitored portion of facility were calculated using the following modified Darcy equation:
Vaw = Ki/ne
where Vgw = average linear velocity (feet/year), K = hydraulic conductivity (feet/year), i = horizontal hydraulic
gradient, and ne = effective porosity.
Five generalized flow paths were examined to estimate linear groundwater flow velocities within areas containing
constituents of concern in groundwater (see Figure 2). The calculated linear velocities for these flow paths
exhibited a range of 15 to 385 feet/year, with an average linear velocity of 111 feet/year, as shown on Table 3. The
estimated average linear velocity of 161 feet/year for Pathway 1 was utilized in the BIOCHLOR modeling discussed
in Section 2.0. The linear velocity equation makes simplifying assumptions of a homogeneous and isotropic
aquifer. The range of linear velocity values observed are indicative of heterogeneous conditions present in the
uppermost aquifer at the facility. The heterogeneous and anisotropic conditions imposed by site geologic
conditions, include but are not limited to the discontinuous, relatively thin silt and clay lenses.
1.5 Contaminant Distribution
The main COCs in groundwater at the facility are VOCs. Although inorganic constituents have been detected in
groundwater samples above published standards, they appear to be naturally occurring based on available data
and as presented in prior routine compliance monitoring reports. Groundwater and surface water analytical results
from semiannual monitoring events from December 2017 through October 2022 are summarized in Table 4 and
Table 5, respectively, along with the historical data available for the facility. The laboratory certificates -of -analysis,
the chain of custody form, and laboratory data reviews for these sampling events were provided previously with
corresponding Water Quality Monitoring Reports. Multiple Appendix I organic constituents were detected above
the method detection limit (MDL) in samples from one or more downgradient monitoring wells during this CAER
review period. Three of the Appendix I organic constituents were detected at concentrations that exceeded their
respective 15A NCAC 02L Standards (21- Standards): benzene (in samples collected from MW-6, MW-7, MW-8,
June 15, 2023

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D I
MW-9, MW-11SR/DR, MW-13SR, MW-14, MW-15R, and MW-18), vinyl chloride (in samples from MW-6, MW-7,
MW-11SR/DR, MW-14, MW-15R, MW-175, and MW-18), and 1,4-Dioxane (in samples from MW-2, MW-7, MW-8,
MW-9, MW-11SR/DR, MW-13SR/DR, MW-14, MW-17SR/DR, MW-18, and MW-19). In November 2018, NCDEQ
added 1,4-Dioxane to the monitored analyte list for North Carolina landfills. Since 1,4-Dioxane was added to the
monitored parameter list, it has been detected at concentrations exceeding the corresponding 2L Standard.
As presented in previous reports, including the 2005 ACM (submitted by HDR) and 2017 ACM (submitted by
Golder), the groundwater contaminant source at the facility has been identified as leachate and landfill gas from
the closed unlined MSW landfill. Historically VOCs, including the chlorinated alkanes, chlorinated alkenes,
chlorinated benzenes, and benzene have been detected at relatively low concentrations at the facility. The
contaminant plume originates underneath the closed MSW landfill and in general extends in the downgradient
groundwater flow directions toward the west and southwest. Groundwater contamination has been detected to
the north in samples from MW-15R, likely due to LFG and localized groundwater flow toward the northern
drainage feature. It is believed that some of the VOC detections in groundwater at the facility, and especially in
samples from wells MW-6 and MW-15R can be attributed to LFG present in and upgradient of those locations.
The relatively high concentrations of methane detected in MW-6 and MW-15R are documented on Table 6.
Figures 3 through 8 provide total VOCs isoconcentration contours for conditions observed during each fall semi-
annual WQME, performed over the past five years. Due to the recent addition of 1,4-Dioxane, total VOC
isoconcentration extents for November 2018 and thereafter, are not directly comparable with prior event extents.
For regulatory compliance, the extents of 2L Standards exceedances are appropriate. Figure 9 depicts estimated
isoconcentration contours for VOCs with 2L Standard exceedances reported during the October 2022 WQME.
Based on the estimated extents of 2L Standard exceedances as shown in Figure 9, some off -site migration of
VOCs above the 2L Standards was plausible during the last five-year period, north of wells MW-6 and MW-15R.
1.6 Description of Site Conceptual Model
The groundwater contaminant source at the facility has been identified as leachate and LFG from the closed
unlined MSW landfill. Water percolating through the cover soil system interacts with waste and generates
leachate. Leachate will percolate downward until it reaches the water table aquifer. Once leachate containing COC
enters the aquifer, characteristics of their migration in the aquifer are primarily governed by hydraulic pressure
gradients and preferred flow paths within the aquifer media. LFG migrating horizontally in the vadose zone away
from the landfill can also transport COCs in the vapor phase over relatively short distances. This can result in a
gas -to -water phase transfer of low levels of VOCs to uppermost aquifer beyond the MSW landfill limits of waste.
In general, surface water and groundwater at the facility flow to the west and southwest toward Horse Creek,
which is located along the western property boundary, representing the most significant local hydraulic boundary.
Relative to the MSW and C&D landfills, a lesser component of groundwater flow is predicted to the north and
south toward adjacent minor unnamed tributaries of Horse Creek. Horse Creek west of the landfill is classified by
NCDEQ as a WSII, Water Supply.
Historic concentrations of VOCs in groundwater have been highest in samples from monitoring wells located
immediately downgradient of the closed MSW landfill (e.g., MW-6, MW-7, and MW-14). Other relatively elevated
concentrations of VOCs have been reported in samples collected from MW-11 SR, MW-11 DR, and MW-15R. The
June 15, 2023

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill �r
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
same suite of VOCs detected in MW-6 and MW-15R have been detected in samples collected from MW-11 SR and
MW-11 DR, intimating that each of the three wells are downgradient of the same contaminant source area.
In the 2017 CAER report, Golder stated that elevated VOC concentrations in the vicinity of monitoring well MW-
15R were likely related to LFG. In November 2018 a landfill gas cut-off trench was installed in an area between the
MSW landfill and well MW-15R. During the last four monitoring events, no 2L Standard violations were reported
for MW-15R. As discussed further in Section 2.3, it is plausible to attribute some of the recent improvements in
groundwater quality at MW-15R to passive venting of LFG intercepted by the new gas cut -of trench. The historical
presence of methane gas in MW-6 and MW-15 / GP-18 is recorded in Table 6.
Two hydrogeologic cross -sections were prepared to depict subsurface conditions, general hydrogeologic
characteristics of the aquifer, and recent COC concentrations (see Figure 10). Cross-section A -A' begins on the
west side of the active C&D landfill and runs to east following a path through MW-19, MW-8, MW-13SR / MW-
13DR, and MW-6. Cross-section B-B' bisects an area between the MSW landfill and C&D landfill following a path
through MW-6, MW-14, MW-7, MW-8, and MW-9. Cross -Section B-B' is oriented generally perpendicular to the
direction of shallow groundwater flow. It includes an area of the historically high total VOC concentrations
immediately down -gradient of MSW landfill source area.
2.0 Corrective Action Summary
The approved MNA voluntary groundwater corrective action was initiated in April 2007. MNA was selected as an
appropriate remedy due to the low risk to human health and the environment determined for the known
groundwater impacts and the fact that the removal of the contaminant source (the closed, unlined MSW landfill) is
not feasible. The data collected during the ACM showed that reducing geochemical conditions did exist and that
natural absorption, biodegradation, and molecular dispersion (i.e., attenuation) of VOC was already occurring at
the facility. Similar findings were reported by Golder in the 2017 CAER report.
An evidence approach to support MNA as an acceptable remedy requires a suitable conceptual site model (CSM)
based on site specific geologic, hydrogeologic, and geochemical conditions. Evaluations to be conducted include
an assessment of known site contaminants and the presence or absence of degradation products. Site
geochemical parameters are evaluated for indicators of a conducive environment and conditions that may limit
the attenuation capacity of the effected aquifer. One of the primary lines of evidence involves a review of the
groundwater plume behavior with a focus on changes in spatial distributions of contaminants and evaluations of
decreasing concentration trends over time. Multiple lines of evidence are assessed to determine the overall
effectiveness of the remedy.
2.1 Physical and Chemical Changes In the Aquifer and Plume Characteristics
A review of data collected indicates that there have been no significant changes to the field geochemical
characteristics of the aquifer during the CAER evaluation period, excluding seasonal variations. There have been
changes in the contaminant plume over the CAER five-year monitoring period. Since implementation of the MNA
corrective measure, the number of constituents exceeding corresponding 2L Standards has declined along with
the number of wells containing a 2L Standard exceedance. For calendar year 2022, the number of constituents at
the facility exceeding the 2L Standard declined to two, excluding 1,4-Dioxane added to the monitored analyte list
June 15, 2023

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill �r
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
for landfills in 2018. Table 7 provides a summary of the constituents of concern, the locations where they have
been detected, and changes to these lists over time.
The overall size of the total VOC plume is estimated to fluctuate some over time. As discussed in Section 1.5, total
VOC isoconcentration extents for November 2018 and thereafter, are not directly comparable with prior event
extents due to the addition of 1,4-Dioxane. Furthermore, given the relatively low concentrations of the COC, some
of the apparent fluctuations may be attributed to short-term variances due to normal sampling variations and the
ability to accurately quantify contaminant concentrations. Except for 1,4-dioxane, the groundwater COC data set
largely suggests trends of overall declining concentrations over time as described further herein.
As presented by Golder in the 2017 CAER document, the facility's organic constituents can be divided into two
main groups: aromatic and aliphatic organic compounds. The aromatic compounds previously presented for the
facility included 1,4-dichIorobenzene; benzene; and chlorobenzene, and the aliphatic compounds identified
include 1,1-Dichloroethane; 1,2-Dichloroethane, cis 1,2-Dichloroethene (cDCE); Tetrachloroethene (PCE);
Trichloroethene (TCE); and Vinyl Chloride (VC).
The new COC for this CAER evaluation period was 1,4-Dioxane, which falls into the aliphatic organic compound
group. Literature suggests that 1,4-Dioxane was used as a solvent stabilizer, it is often found in association with
releases of other chlorinated solvents. The detection of 1,4-Dioxane does not represent evidence of a new release.
2.1.1 Aromatic Compounds
In most cases, aromatic VOCs are readily susceptible to the natural attenuation processes in aerobic environments.
Aromatic VOCs degrade slower in the anaerobic conditions found in the subsurface at the facility. Under
anaerobic conditions, aromatic VOCs may provide a carbon source for stimulation of biological degradation of
chlorinated aliphatic compounds. Therefore, under the mixed -plume scenario present at the facility, natural
biodegradation processes for both contaminant classes may be stimulated at the facility (USGS, 2006).
2.1.2 Aliphatic Compounds
Aliphatic VOCs are relatively soluble and mobile in groundwater, generally recalcitrant to degradation in aerobic
environments, especially when compared to aromatic VOCs. Due to the relatively recalcitrant nature of aliphatic
VOCs, higher concentrations may be found further downgradient in groundwater than aromatic VOCs when
similar source masses are involved. Unlike aromatic VOCs, biodegradation rates for most aliphatic VOCs are
relatively higher in anaerobic aquifer conditions, as compared to aerobic aquifer conditions.
Published literature indicates that reductive dechlorination can occur by sequential dechlorination from
tetrachloroethene (PCE) —> trichloroethene (TCE) —> cis 1,2-dichloroethene (cDCE) —> vinyl chloride (VC) —> ethene.
In anaerobic environments, the highest concentrations of parent compounds PCE and TCE tend to be near the
source, with degradation products or daughter products (e.g., such as cDCE, VC, and ethene) located
downgradient from the source. During the biodegradation process, the chlorinated hydrocarbon is used as an
electron acceptor and chlorine atoms are removed and replaced with hydrogen atoms. In this case biodegradation
is an electron donor limited process, controlled by the availability of carbon sources such as organic matter in the
aquifer matrix or aromatic VOCs as indicated above. Chlorinated hydrocarbons can also undergo biodegradation
through use as an electron doner. In this case the rate of reductive dechlorination is controlled by the availability
of electron acceptors such as nitrate, ferric iron, sulfate, or via co -metabolic processes.
June 15, 2023 10

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D I
Literature reports indicate that the dechlorination sequence can be inhibited or interrupted at the cDCE to VC
chloride stage and VC to ethene stage if the aquifer is characterized by weakly reductive conditions. Data obtained
during this assessment indicates that suitable conditions exist in site groundwater.
In the case of landfills, the degradation of PCE and TCE to daughter products often occurs at or near waste units,
which typically produce anerobic conditions. Degradation of chlorinated VOCs in groundwater can produce
concurrent plumes of parent compounds and daughter products, with the VC plume generally extending farthest
from the source area. When degradation is occurring within the waste mass, clear indications of the degradation
sequence can be obscured due to the introduction of the degradation products at the point of release. Given that
the source areas for the subject release are within the landfill waste, source area monitoring wells are non-existent.
This limitation required that the MNA evaluations make assumptions regarding source concentrations and if the
source concentration is constant or decays over time. Based on the monitoring data obtained, the facility exhibits
characteristics indicative of reductive dechlorination and biodegradation occurring, suggesting that MNA is an
effective remedy.
Although 1,4-Dioxane is considered resistant to naturally occurring biodegradation processes, there is some
evidence that intrinsic biodegradation can take place under suitable site conditions (Adamson, D et. al. 2015).
Published literatures suggest that MNA may be possible when 1,4-Dioxane concentrations are less than 150
microgram per liter (pg/L). The sample size for the groundwater analytical data set for 1,4-Dioxane at the subject
site is relatively small. Given an anticipated relatively low attenuation rate, long-term groundwater plume
monitoring data is essential. Additional monitoring data is needed to perform an adequate evaluation of MNA as
an effective remedy for 1,4-Dioxane.
2.1.3 Geochemistry
Analysis of geochemical or indicator parameters (including chloride, dissolved oxygen, ethane, ethene, ferrous
iron, methane, nitrate, oxygen reduction potential, total alkalinity, total organic carbon, sulfate, sulfide, and volatile
fatty acids) was performed on samples from the "performance monitoring" or MNA monitoring wells. A summary
of the results from the geochemical or indicator parameter monitoring can be found in Table 8 (field parameter)
and Table 9 (laboratory analytical results).
To assess the possibility that chlorinated (aromatic and aliphatic) VOCs are naturally attenuating at the site,
geochemical parameters were evaluated based on criteria presented in the Technical Protocol for Evaluating
Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Solvents in Ground Water, Table 2.3 (EPA, 1998). The BIOCHLOR model
software includes a form (e.g., score card) which utilizes the same criteria and scoring system. Relying upon field
and laboratory data for the October 2022 WQME, score cards were completed for site monitoring wells MW-4,
MW-6, MW-8, MW-9, MM-11SR, and MW-15R, and are presented in Appendix II. Site conditions for October
WQMEs over the last 5 years report generally similar conditions. The screening protocol scores for wells MW-4,
MW-6, MW-8, MW-9, MW-11SR, and MW15R can be interpreted to indicate that there is adequate, too strong
evidence for anaerobic biodegradation of chlorinated organics.
The field measured dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations fluctuated over time but were generally between the 0.1
and 0.5 milligrams per liter (mg/L) and oxygen reduction potential (ORP) was generally less than 50 milli -volts
(mV) in monitoring wells MW-6, MW-7, MW-8, MW-9, MW-11SR, and MW-15R. Literature reports that ORP levels
less than 50 mV indicate that the reductive pathway is possible. Additionally, in general, concentrations of ferrous
June 15, 2023 11

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D I
iron reported for monitoring wells MW-2, MW-6, MW-7, MW-8, MW-9, MW-11SR, and MW-15R support the
presence of a reducing geochemical environment. As noted in the previous section, a reducing geochemical
environment is generally supportive of reductive dechlorination (i.e., biodegradation) of chlorinated VOCs.
The biological process of methanogenesis can produce methane associated with reductive dechlorination. This
process typically occurs relatively close to the contaminant source area. Dissolved methane concentrations greater
than 0.5 mg/L have been reported in groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW-6, MW-7, MW-8, MW-9,
MW-11SR, and MW-15R. Observed methane concentrations greater than 0.5 mg/L could indicate reductive
dechlorination of chlorinated VOCs. Since dissolved methane can also be associated with landfill gas migrating
through the vadose zone, this additional source needs to be considered. Most groundwater monitoring wells at
the site are not monitored for methane gas. Methane gas is monitored at MW-6 and GP-18 and has been
detected above the lower explosive limit for methane in these wells.
The process of sulfate reduction typically occurs further from the source area, when compared with
methanogenesis. Reported sulfate concentrations were generally below 20 mg/L in monitoring wells MW-1, MW
2, MW-3, MW-6, MW-7, MW-9, MW-11 SR, and MW-15R. Concentrations of sulfate greater than 20 mg/L can
inhibit reductive dechlorination. Similarly, nitrate concentrations greater than 1 mg/L can inhibit reductive
dechlorination. Nitrate in groundwater monitoring wells MW-1, MW-3, MW-6, MW-7, MW-8, MW-9, MW-11SR,
and MW-15R were generally not reported above 1 mg/L.
Chloride in groundwater is generally non -reactive. Chloride should accumulate in groundwater in areas where
reductive dechlorination is occurring. During the current MNA evaluation period, chloride has been routinely
detected at concentrations greater than 2 times the background concentration in samples from MW-2, MW-4,
MW-6, MW-7, MW-8, MW-9, and MW-11SR, providing evidence of reductive dechlorination of chlorinated COCs.
In areas of reductive dechlorination of chlorinated VOCs, there should be a positive correlation between zones of
microbial activity and increased alkalinity. Increases in alkalinity result from the dissolution of minerals in the
aquifer matrix, which is driven by the production of carbon dioxide by the metabolism of microorganisms. The
alkalinity of groundwater samples was determined by laboratory analysis for total alkalinity during the MNA
evaluation period. The data presented in Table 9 provide evidence for total alkalinity concentrations for wells
MW-2, MW-4, MW-6, MW-7, MW-8, MW-9, MW-11 SR, and MW-15R down -gradient of the source area being
elevated at least two times the background values well MW-5. Similarly, analytical results summarized in Table 9
also show elevated concentrations of dissolved carbon dioxide in downgradient wells MW-3, MW-4, MW-6, MW-
7, MW-8, MW-9, MW-11SR, and MW-15R when compared with background well MW-5, providing additional
supporting evidence of biodegradation of chlorinated VOCs.
The sequential reduction of PCE -> TCE -> cDCE -> VC is suggested by the groundwater analytical data obtained
for the facility. PCE, TCE, cDCE, and VC were detected during the early years of groundwater monitoring at
concentrations that exceeded their corresponding 2L standards. Ethene is the anticipated final daughter product
of reductive dechlorination of VC. MNA performance monitoring for ethene has resulted in only two estimated
detections. VC concentrations in wells near the MSW source area have declined overtime, with the last two years
reporting most VC detections in the 2 pg/L or less range. The relatively low VC concentrations currently observed
coupled with detection limits of 1 pg/L and greater for ethene, may give reason for the non -detection of ethene,
thus the absence of ethene as an indicator parameter is not a concern. Under these conditions, the utility of
ethene is limited as this indicator parameter to support the reductive dechlorination of VC.
June 15, 2023 12

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
ICI
Based on the evaluations presented above, facility geochemical parameters indicate adequate to strong evidence
for anaerobic biodegradation of chlorinated VOCs and suggest that anaerobic biodegradation of the chlorinated
VOCs is naturally occurring. Furthermore, the presence of aromatic hydrocarbons within the plume and the
generally reducing geochemical conditions also allow for the degradation of aromatic hydrocarbons as a carbon
source during biological degradation of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons. It is recognized that biodegradation
processes can slow as chlorinated VOCs and aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations diminish with time.
2.1.4 BIOCHLOR Model
Based on historic groundwater analytical data, the highest groundwater contaminant concentrations have
generally occurred in the northern portion of the contaminant plume, immediately west of the MSW landfill. This
area also exhibited greater horizontal extents of total VOCs as indicated on Figures 3 through 8; therefore, this
area was selected for a performance evaluation of MNA utilizing the BIOCHLOR model. Monitoring wells MW-6,
MW-11 SR, and MW-4 represent the modeled plume centerline, chosen due to the position of the wells, simulating
the estimated groundwater flow from the MSW landfill source area to Horse Creek, the dominant local
groundwater discharge point. The prior CAER report utilized MW-15R as a well immediately down -gradient of the
source area for the BIOCHLOR modeling performed. It is S&ME's opinion that MW-6 is more representative of the
groundwater flow path assessed, thus MW-15R was not utilized in the BIOCHLOR modeling for this CAER report.
Furthermore, S&ME believed that the gas cut-off trench installed in November 2018, immediately south of MW-
15R has had localize influence on groundwater quality, thus use of MW-15R in the model could result in model
predictions that were not representative of the flow -path assessed.
The start date for the site model was 1968, the year when waste was reportedly first placed in the closed MSW
landfill. Historically, the first model simulations associated with the MNA evaluation were performed after the
October 2007 WQME; therefore, the model was calibrated at 39 years and then projected to 100 years. Each
subsequent model was calibrated based on the same concept and the model was calibrated using a duration
period (time in years) equal to the difference between the modelled scenario year and 1968. The initial model
created in October 2007 showed the simulated biodegradation of PCE, TCE, DCE, and VC. After October 2007,
there were no detections of PCE or TCE in the monitoring wells along the modeled plume centerline. Since PCE
and TCE were not detected after 2007, the original model was considered to be calibrated for PCE and TCE during
the October 2007 modeling event and the values for their 1 st order decay coefficient were used throughout.
The BIOCHLOR modeling program generates plots that compare concentrations of PCE, TCE, cDCE, VC, and
ethene over time with no degradation, to concentrations where sequential 1 st order biological attenuation is
occurring. For this CAER report review period (December 2017 — October 2022), the model was run with 49-year
and 100-year simulations, for wells MW-6, MW-11 SR, and MW-4, using PCE, TCE, DCE, VC, and ethene as the
modeled constituents. Several model runs were performed using source area concentrations and primary model
inputs that were consistent with prior modeling efforts conducted by others. The output results did not show
reasonable calibration. Considering groundwater analytical results for the last five years, for wells immediately
down gradient of the MSW source area, S&ME inferred that source area concentrations have likely diminished.
Improvements to model calibration were achieved utilizing lower source concentrations. Consistent with prior
modeling efforts, source concentrations applied in the model were considered constant for the duration of each
modeled scenario. For the centerline wells there were several non -detections of modeled constituents in October
2022. The detection limit was relied upon when non -detections were reported. The data input page and the
associated constituent plots for the 49-years and 100 years simulations are provided in Appendix III.
June 15, 2023 13

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill �r
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
In summary, the results of the BIOCHLOR modeling conducted annually from December 2017 through October
2022 predict concentrations of DCE and VC that plot on or below the sequential first order decay curve in each
model run, indicating that degradation of the constituents is occurring. PCE, TCE, and ethene were generally not
detected during the last 5 years, therefore, they can no longer be assessed with the model.
The BIOCHLOR model outputs exhibit concentrations that decline to non -detectable concentrations before the
end of the graphs, which represent the location of Horse Creek. There appears to be little to no difference
between the curves on the 49-year and 100-year simulations, indicating the contaminant plume is currently at or
near a steady state condition and changes in its downgradient expanse should be limited.
The October 2022 isoconcentration contours suggest the potential for off -site migration of VOCs to the north
near MW-15R. In this area a limited separation distance exists between the edge of waste and the property line.
As discussed in Section 2.1.5, there are trends of improving groundwater VOC concentrations at MW-15R. The
benzene plume in the vicinity of monitoring wells MW-18 and MW-19, is estimated to be near the eastern
property line. As discussed in Section 2.1.5 below, concentrations at MW-19 appear to be generally stable.
2.1.5 Trends in Contaminant Concentrations
The evidence approach to support MNA as an acceptable remedy indicates that trends of decreasing COC
concentrations over time, should be considered a primary line of evidence. Appendix IV presents the intra-well
concentration trend graphs for analytes exceeding 2L Standards (i.e., benzene, vinyl chloride, and 1,4-Dioxane)
during the December 2017 through October 2022, CAER evaluation period. The chart formats developed include:
Five Benzene charts, each with a group of wells that occur along one of the five conceptual flow paths
originating at or near the MSW landfill and ending near Horse Creek.
Five VC charts, each with a group of wells that occur along one of the five conceptual flow paths
originating at or near the MSW landfill and ending near Horse Creek.
cDCE charts to depict the daughter product of PCE and TCE. One chart for wells that are directly adjacent
to the MSW landfill and another chart for wells that are directly adjacent to the C&D landfill. Charts for
PCE and TCE were not prepared due to the number of non -detections.
1,4_Dioxane charts. One chart for wells that are directly adjacent to the MSW landfill and another chart for
wells that are directly adjacent to the C&D landfill.
In general, the charts for benzene, cDCE, and VC depict overall trends of declining concentration with time.
For some wells, segments of the benzene, cDCE, and VC charts where concentrations have declined to relatively
low -levels or concentrations approach method detection limits, make it difficult to discern a trend. These
occurrences likely reflect natural temporal variability and/or limitation of laboratory analytical accuracy, thus they
do not necessarily indicate that MNA is no longer a viable remedy. Benzene and Vinyl Chloride were present at
concentrations greater than the corresponding 2L Standards during this CAER evaluation period. During the CAER
review period, concentrations for cDCE were less than the corresponding 2L Standard.
Concentration trends for 1,4-Dioxane over time are generally less obvious. Published literature reports that
detections of 1,4-Dioxane by routine analytical methods may be complicated by the compound's relatively high
solubility in water and chlorinated VOC interferences. The population of the 1,4-Dioxane data set is relatively small
due to its introduction in 2018, thus the data set is of lower statistical power.
June 15, 2023 14

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
ICI_
The trend charts provide a powerful qualitative visual analysis of intra-well COC concentrations over time. As an
additional evaluation tool, the Mann -Kendall statistical test was also applied to analyze trends in concentrations
over time for the same data set. This statistical test assesses if there is a monotonic upward or downward trend of
the variable of interest (COC concentrations) over time. A monotonic upward (downward) trend means that the
variable consistently increases (decreases) through time, but the trend may not be linear. The Mann -Kendall test is
broadly accepted by many regulatory agencies since it applies a quantitative evaluation to trends in
concentrations over time. However, like most statistical tests, the user must consider inherent limitations
associated with the test method.
For the current CAER period evaluations, the tests were constrained to data obtained between October 2015
through October 2022. This protocol made the Mann -Kendall test results more rigorous by excluding more
substantial concentration changes present in the full historic data set. As recommended for the Mann Kendall test,
non -detection values were modified for the test. Concentrations reported as non -detections were converted to
values'/z of the reporting limit. The Mann -Kendall test indicated the following intra-well trends:
MW-4: VC (NA), cDCE (S), Benzene (AND), and 1,4-Dioxane (NTD).
MW-6: VC (D), cDCE (D), Benzene (D), and 1,4-Dioxane (D).
MW-7: VC (NTD), cDCE (NTD), Benzene (D), and 1,4-Dioxane (NTD).
MW-9: VC (NA), cDCE (S), Benzene (S), and 1,4-Dioxane (NTD).
MW-14: VC (S), cDCE (D), Benzene (D), and 1,4-Dioxane (NTD).
MW-15R: VC (S), cDCE (NTD), Benzene (D), and 1,4-Dioxane (NA).
MW-11SR: VC (D), cDCE (D), Benzene (NTD), and 1,4-Dioxane (D).
MW-11 DR: VC (D), cDCE (D), Benzene (NTD), and 1,4-Dioxane (D).
MW-13SR: VC (NA), cDCE (S), Benzene (D), and 1,4-Dioxane (1).
MW-13DR: VC (AND), cDCE (D), Benzene (NA), and 1,4-Dioxane (NTD).
MW-18: VC (D), cDCE (D), Benzene (D), and 1,4-Dioxane (S).
MW-19: VC (NA), cDCE (NA), Benzene (AND), and 1,4-Dioxane (S).
S = Stable, D = Decreasing, I = Increasing, NTD = No Trend Discernable, AND = All Non -Detects,
NA = No trend suggested due to a high percentage of non -detections.
The Mann -Kendall tests contained in Appendix V generally indicated stable or declining concentrations of the
COCs at the wells evaluated, with some trends not discernable due to a high percentage of non -detections. A
high percentage of non -detections of COCs is a favorable and desired outcome. As mentioned in the discussion of
time vs concentration charts, detections of relatively low concentrations and/or concentrations approximating the
respective reporting limits are conditions that hamper analyses of trends over time. These occurrences likely
reflect either natural temporal variability and/or limitations of laboratory analytical accuracy, thus they do not
necessarily indicate that MNA is no longer a viable remedy.
The Mann -Kendall test was performed on the 1,4-dioxane data set as an initial screening tool. The Mann -Kendall
test requires at least four data points to perform the calculations. However, it is S&ME opinion that the current
1,4-dioxane data set does not have adequate statistical power to provide for reliable conclusions and associated
decision making.
June 15, 2023 15

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill .�
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
2.2 Refining the Conceptual Model
After completing the initial phase of the MNA performance evaluation period, the original conceptual model
presented in the 2005 ACM submitted by HDR, in the 2012 and 2017 CAER reports, and the one presented in
Section 1.5 of this report remain accurate depictions of site conditions. In the last five years there has been a
growing number of low-level detections of certain VOCs at the facility, which makes it increasingly difficult to
accurately assess recent trends in concentrations over time, given that some of the variances observed between
monitoring events may not be statistically significant. This and other factors limit the functionality of the
BIOCHLOR model to accurately simulate some of the more recent site conditions. This is a common challenge
when concentrations of COCs approach the laboratory MDLs. This technical limitation need not overshadow the
fact that an increase in the number of low-level detections is a positive outcome. Assessing trends in COC
concentrations over time is considered a primary line of evidence for evaluations of MNA.
The BIOCHLOR model was run for the CAER review period with results indicating simulated biodegradation of
COCs as first -order biotransformation. Furthermore, site geochemical data and indicator parameters provide
secondary evidence of subsurface conditions that are favorable for biodegradation to occur at the facility.
There is some evidence that Total Organic Carbon (TOC) concentrations decrease with increased distance from the
source, with the more apparent area for this occurrence located west of wells MW-8 and MW-9, represented by
wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3. Since reductive dechlorination is often limited by the amount of available organic
carbon, such as provided for in MSW landfill leachate and consumed by the biodegradation process; a slower rate
of biodegradation away from the landfill (i.e., an organic carbon source) is expected. Wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3,
MW-8, and MW-9 report cDCE and VC concentrations less than the corresponding 2L Standard, thus lower TOC
concentrations in this area have had no impact on groundwater quality compliance.
VC and cDCE are among the final reductive dechlorination compounds produced and can be more recalcitrant
daughter compounds when compared with other compounds involved earlier in the process. Stalling of the
dechlorination process at the cDCE or VC steps can occur where site conditions are less suitable for supporting the
process. A review of site geochemistry data collected indicates suitable conditions for reductive dechlorination. VC
has been detected in down -gradient well MW-18 but not in well MW-19, located further downgradient. S&ME
believes that VC detected at MW-18 migrated from the MSW landfill and the area represented by well MW-14.
The simplified groundwater flow paths depicted in Figure 2 cannot fully capture heterogeneous aquifer subtleties
that influence groundwater flow beneath the facility. The presence of relatively low concentrations of VC in down -
gradient monitoring well MW-18 does not indicate that MNA is an unsuitable corrective measure, rather it likely
indicates a slower degradation rate for VC, and that additional travel distances from the source area may be
necessary to achieve CAP cleanup goals.
Groundwater contamination detected to the north in samples from MW-15R, is likely due to LFG and a minor
component of groundwater flow toward the northern drainage feature. It is believed that some of the VOC
detections in groundwater at the facility, and especially in samples from wells MW-6 and MW-15R can be
attributed in part to LFG present in and upgradient of those locations.
Recent trends in COC concentrations over time at well MW-15R are noteworthy. Well MW-15R is in the immediate
vicinity of the passive LFG cut-off trench installed in November 2018, as part of an LFG remediation plan.
Groundwater analytical results received after November 2018, indicate a higher percentage of non -detections of
June 15, 2023 16

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
ICI_
VC and the last four monitoring events reported consistently lower concentrations of benzene. Although
additional time vs concentration data is needed to substantiate this opinion, it appears plausible to attribute all or
part of the apparent improvements in groundwater quality at MW-15R to passive venting of LFG intercepted by
the cut-off trench. Recognizing the potential benefits of enhanced LFG management discussed in Section 1.2,
Moore County initiated a pilot test in 2022. The pilot test involved localized improvements to the MSW cover
system and installation of two additional passive gas vents that tapped into transmissive vadose zone sandy
sediments forming a partition between two MSW landfill units. At this time, it is premature to forecast benefits the
cover system improvements and/or the additional venting of LFG from the new vents wells may provide.
2.3 Corrective Action Method Evaluation
The MNA corrective action evaluations conducted provide evidence that biodegradation is occurring and that
there is a reduction in contaminant concentrations (with respect to chlorinated ethene COCs). The BIOCHLOR
model and associated EPA screening score card tool were used to evaluate biodegradation of COCs. The
BIOCHLOR model is designed to evaluate changes in concentrations that occur along a flow path that is linear and
with groundwater flow that is directly down -gradient. Relying solely upon site topography and assuming a minor
component of shallow groundwater flow toward the north or northwest, localized off -site migration of
groundwater COCs, although likely limited in extent, is estimated in the area north of MW-6 and MW-15R.
Both primary (e.g., changes in COC concentrations over time) and secondary lines of evidence (e.g., site
geochemistry and other indicator parameters) presented herein converge to support MNA as an appropriate
groundwater corrective action remedy for the Moore County Landfill. As stated previously in this report, there is
sufficient evidence showing that reductive conditions exist and that reductive dechlorination is occurring. Due to
sufficiently strong reductive conditions, aromatics compounds, more specifically benzene, chlorobenzene, and 1,4-
dichlorobenzene may not breakdown as easily as they would in more aerobic conditions. However, they may be
utilized and degraded as a carbon source in a mixed anaerobic plume scenario, effectively supporting reductive
dechlorination. In the last five years, concentrations of benzene and 1,4-dichlorobenzene have not decreased
significantly at wells immediately down -gradient of the MSW source area, indicating a constant source remains in
the waste mass. This condition produces low single digit benzene concentrations greater than the corresponding
2L Standard but less than the corresponding EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) currently exists. Conversely,
1,4-dichlorobenzene concentrations are one order of magnitude or more, less than the corresponding 2L
Standard. Concentrations of the aliphatic COCs have been decreasing and there has not been a detection of PCE
or TCE above the corresponding 2L Standards since October 2007.
Historic methane monitoring data reported persistent relatively high levels of methane at compliance monitoring
probes GP-10, MW-6, and MW-15 / GP-18. In 2005 Moore County installed 12 passive gas vents into 2 trenches
dug into waste to the south of MW-15 along the facility's northern property boundary to attempt mitigation of
probable off -site migration of methane gas. In 2007, 3 more trenches with 12 more passive gas vents were added
to the passive gas trench system. In 2005, HDR added a contingency to MNA, suggesting that the facility initiate
more aggressive methane corrective actions if the gas vent/trench system was not effective at keeping LFG from
crossing the compliance boundary. Following the submittal of the May 2012 CAER, it was determined that more
aggressive methane corrective actions should be taken and on May 16, 2013, Moore County submitted the
Contingency Plan Update and Implementation Plan — Revised. The contingency plan was approved by the NCDEQ
in a letter dated June 5, 2013, and in accordance with the approved plan, three additional vents, GV-30, GV-31,
June 15, 2023 17

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill �r
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
and GV-32 were installed in February 2014, to the south of the existing trench -vent system. These passive gas
vents have regularly produced high concentrations of LFG.
Based on persistently elevated levels of methane at compliance monitoring probe MW-15 (GP-18), Golder
prepared a Gas Remediation Plan. As part of a Gas Remediation Plan, the LFG cut -off -trench was installed in
November 2018, in an area between the closed MSW landfill and monitoring well MW-15 (GP-18). Following
installation of the LFG cut-off trench, LFG monitoring data continued to suggest the potential for methane
migrating offsite to the north. Subsequently, Moore County evaluated options that would aid in the management
of landfill gases, which can contribute to groundwater exceedances.
In 2022, Moore County placed and graded additional clean fill soils in certain low areas on the MSW cover system,
to improve positive surface drainage. Reduced infiltration into the waste should reduce generation of landfill
gases, and transfers of vapor phase constituents to underlying groundwater. In June 2022, S&ME initiated a pilot
test involving installation and monitoring of two new passive landfill gas vents that tap into transmissive vadose
zone sandy sediments forming a narrow partition between two MSW landfill units. Landfill gas monitoring
continues for the pilot test, conducted to assess a potential to enhance management of landfill gas migration in
the vicinity of monitoring point GP-18. Supplemental measures to aid in mitigation of horizontal migration of LFG
from the MSW landfill should further enhance the currently viable MNA of VOCs in facility groundwater.
2.4 Impacts At The Compliance Boundary and Off -Site Migration
As stated in Section 2.3 and depicted on Figure 9, it is plausible that benzene and VC concentrations in
groundwater may extend beyond a portion of the northern compliance boundary (e.g., area north of MW-6) at
concentrations greater than their respective 2L Standards. The BIOCHLOR models, trend charts, and Mann Kendall
test suggest that the contaminant plume is generally stable or shrinking. Accordingly, it is forecasted that the
contaminant plume may not migrate significantly further to the north. The aerobic conditions expected north of
the property boundary will likely degrade the aromatics and potentially vinyl chloride. The creeks surrounding the
landfill property represent common hydraulic boundary conditions, which limit lateral migration of groundwater
COCs at a significant distance from the property boundary.
Figure 11 presents the desk -top water well receptor information developed previously by Golder, which was
based on a review of the available public water supply GIS database. Based on this receptor information, there are
no downgradient water supply well receptors identified within 1500 feet of the contaminant source (e.g., MSW
landfill). Considering the absence of downgradient water well receptors and that VOCs are at relatively low
concentrations, these factors support continued MNA for the groundwater remedy. As shown on Table 5, during
2017 — 2022 CAER monitoring period 1,4-Dioxane was detected in samples from SW-1, SW-3, and SW-4 at
concentrations greater than the 15A NCAC 02B, NC Protective value. Currently, there is no corresponding 15A
NCAC 02B surface water standard for 1,4-Dixoane. No other VOCs were detected with concentration greater than
a corresponding 15A NCAC 02B surface water standard or NC Protective values.
Table 6 provides recent methane gas detections at property boundary compliance points. As presented in Sectior
2.3, a pilot test was initiated in 2022, exploring an option to improve methane gas control. The pilot test efforts
are on -going. In 2022 Moore County reestablished efforts to develop a dialog with the Blake family, the owner of
the parcel to the north of the MSW landfill. It is Moore County's desire to negotiate purchase of additional land to
the north. The facility's current property boundary provides limited separation between the edge of waste for the
June 15, 2023 18

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill �r
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
close MSW landfill and the off -site property to the north, thus additional buffer property is needed. The property
to the north is mostly undeveloped, with no structures within 400 feet or greater of the facility's, norther property
boundary. Thus, off -site migration of methane gas presents a relatively low risk to human health and the
environment.
3.0 Conclusions and Recommendations
In conclusion, based on our evaluation of the five-year CAER period from December 2017 through October 2022,
it is possible that groundwater impacts extend slightly beyond the property boundary on the northern side of the
facility as estimated on Figure 9. The County is currently exploring the option to acquire buffer property in this
area to mitigate potential risks to human health and the environment. The BIOCHLOR modeling performed
suggests that the plume has reached stabilization. This is consistent with observed trends of VOCs generally
declining over time as depicted in time vs concentration charts (Appendix IV) and by a reduction in the number
of COC detected with concentrations greater than the 2L Standard during the CAER period (see Table 7).
One new COC, 1,4-Dioxane was introduced during the CAER review period due to NCDEQ's addition of this
volatile organic compound to the target compound list for North Carolina landfills. Published literature reports
that although this compound is resistant to naturally occurring biodegradation processes, biodegradation in
groundwater can take place under suitable site conditions. The sample size for the facility's 1,4-Dioxane
groundwater analytical data set is limited and provides limited statistical power. This limitation is manifested in
time vs concentration charts that exhibit a general lack of discernable trends over time. Acquisition of several
years of additional time series data for 1,4-Dioxane, collected during future semi-annual monitoring events is
recommended. Additional data is needed prior to selection of a remedy, which could include MNA. A Contingency
Plan Update involving 1,4-Dioxane should be prepared and submitted to NCDEQ prior to the end of the next 5-
year CAER evaluation period.
It appears that the addition of the LFG cut-off trench between the edge of waste and MW-15R, resulted in
improved groundwater quality at MW-15R, however, non -compliant methane gas conditions persist at property
line monitoring point GP-18. The off -site property to the north is an undeveloped pine tree woodland area, with
no structures within 400 feet or more of the northern property line; therefore, the methane LEL exceedance is not
currently known to pose a risk to human health. In 2022, Moore County initiated a pilot test, which involved
repairs to improve surface drainage off the MSW landfill cover system and installation of two additional passive
landfill gas vents. Reduced infiltration of water into the waste should reduce generation of landfill gases, and
transfers of vapor phase constituents to underlying groundwater. Measured methane concentrations detected at
existing in -waste methane vents GV-30, GV-31, and GV-32 and new vents GV-35 and GW-36 installed in
transmissive vadose zone sediments, have been relatively high; therefore, these vents help limit off -site landfill gas
migration. Based on the age of the MSW waste it is not anticipated that additional in -waste passive or active
vents/wells would be an appropriate remedy. The limited separation distance between the edge of waste and the
northern property line imposes a physical limitation. During the CAER review period, the County initiated dialog
with the adjoining property owner to the north of MW-6 and GP-18. The County desires to resolve this issue by
purchasing the adjoining property to the north, to increase their buffer area. The County respectfully requests
additional time to explore the current feasibility of the desired property acquisition, which represents the most
reasonable and reliable solution to reported exceedances of methane LEL conditions at the northern property line.
June 15, 2023 19

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
ICI_
Surface water monitoring has not indicated exceedances of corresponding 15A NCAC 02B surface water
standards. 1,4-Dioxane, a new groundwater COC has been detected in surface water samples collected from
locations SW-1, SW-2, and SW-3 at concentrations that exceed the 15A NCAC 02B North Carolina In -Stream
Target Value set at 0.35 pg/L for Class WS (I-V) surface waters; however, no 2B Standard currently exists. Based on
the analytical results received and absence of a 02B Standard, it appears that offsite migration of 1,4-Dioxane is
not currently known to pose a risk to human health and the environment via the surface water pathway.
Based on the current information and as shown on Figure 11, no downgradient receptors have been identified
within a 1500-foot radius of the source area (closed MSW landfill). Because no potential risk receptors were
identified during the Golder desktop receptor survey, continuation of MNA for the remediation of VOCs at the
facility is proposed, with continued assessment of the likelihood of the contaminants of concern crossing the
compliance boundary at concentrations above the 2L Standard. Should a new receptor be identified in the
immediate area or if the plume appears to be migrating off -site above the 2L Standard, the installation of
additional monitoring wells and/or re-evaluating the sole use of MNA as a remedy may be appropriate; however,
this situation does not currently exist. There is not an evident need to implement a contingency plan to address
VOC concentrations in groundwater. The County continues efforts to assess the feasibility of obtaining additional
buffer property to the north to address methane non -compliant conditions and the potential of slight off -site
migration of groundwater COC.
There is strong evidence of reductive dechlorination at the facility based on indicator parameter results, the
BIOCHLOR modeling, and declining trends in VOCs; therefore, continuation of MNA monitoring is recommended,
along with on -going pilot testing discussed herein. At the end of the next five-year MNA monitoring period, the
need for an addendum to the ACM will be evaluated.
4.0 Refences
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, 75A NC Administrative Code
Subchapter 28.0200 Classifications and Water Quality Standards Applicable to Surface Waters and Wetlands of NC,
November 2019. Surface Water Standards Tables updated 06-10-2019.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, 75A NC Administrative Code
Subchapter 2L .0200 Groundwater Quality Standards, April 2022.
Golder Associates NC, Inc. (Golder), Alternate Source Demonstration for Active C&D Landfill, Moore County
Construction and Demolition Landfill, NC SWP# 63-01, Submitted to NCDEQ: February 28, 2017.
Golder Associates NC, Inc. (Golder), Assessment Monitoring Work Plan, Moore County Construction and
Demolition Landfill, NC SWP# 63-01, Submitted to NCDEQ: January 5, 2018.
Golder Associates NC, Inc. (Golder), Corrective Action Evaluation Report, Moore County Landfill, NC SWP# 63-01,
Submitted to NCDENR: May 15, 2012.
Golder Associates NC, Inc. (Golder), Groundwater Corrective Action Evaluation Report, Moore County Landfill, NC
SWP# 63-01, Submitted to NCDEQ: October 16, 2017.
June 15, 2023 20

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill �r
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Golder Associates NC, Inc. (Golder), Groundwater Corrective Action Milestone Schedule, Moore County Closed MSW
Landfill, NC SWP# 63-01, Submitted to NCDEQ: January 31, 2018.
Golder Associates NC, Inc. (Golder), Landfill Gas Remediation Plan, Moore County Closed MSW Landfill, NC SWP#
63-01, Submitted to NCDEQ: January 31, 2018.
Golder Associates NC, Inc. (Golder), Request for Extension, Moore County Landfill, NC SWP# 63-01, Submitted to
NC DEQ: December 6, 2017.
Golder Associates NC, Inc. (Golder), Request for Monitored Natural Attenuation Parameter Modification, Moore
County Landfill, NC SWP# 63-01, Submitted to NCDENR: January 22, 2008.
Golder Associates NC, Inc. (Golder), Response to Letters Received from NC DEQ Dated September 28, 2077, Moore
County Landfill, NC SWP# 63-01, Submitted to NCDEQ: October 26, 2017.
Golder Associates NC, Inc. (Golder), Second Semi -Annual Water Quality Monitoring Report, Moore County Landfill,
NC SWP# 63-01, Submitted to NCDEQ: March 29, 2017.
Golder Associates NC, Inc. (Golder), Water Quality Monitoring Plan, Moore County Landfill, NC SWP# 63-01,
Submitted to NC DEQ: Submitted to NCDEQ: December 10, 2019.
Golder Associates NC, Inc. (Golder), Semi -Annual Water Quality Reports, for monitoring during December 2017,
April 2018, October 2018, April 2019, October 2019, and April 2020.
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas (HDR), Addendum to Plan to Address Potential Contamination, Moore
County Landfill, NC SWP# 63-01, Submitted to NCDENR: March 20, 2000.
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas (HDR), Assessment of Corrective Measures Report, Moore County Landfill, NC
SWP# 63-01, Submitted to NCDENR: July 29, 2005.
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas (HDR), Phase I Environmental Assessment, Moore County Landfill, NC SWP#
63-01, Submitted to NCDENR: November 30, 1999
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas (HDR), Water Quality Monitoring Plan, Moore County Landfill, NC SWP# 63-
01, Submitted to NCDENR: July 20, 2006.
Joyce Engineering, Inc., Contingency Plan Update and Implementation Plan - Revised, Moore County Landfill, NC
SWP# 63-01, Submitted to NCDENR: May 16, 2013.
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR), Division of Solid Waste
Management, Water Quality Monitoring at Moore County Sanitary Landfill, Moore County Landfill, NC SWP# 63-
01, NCDEHNR to Moore County: January 23, 1996.
June 15, 2023 21

Corrective Actions Evaluation Report
Moore County Landfill
Aberdeen, North Carolina III
s
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D E
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of Waste Management,
Request for Monitored Natural Attenuation Parameter Modification, Moore County Landfill, NC SWP# 63-01, NC
DENR to Moore County: April 18, 2008.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), Solid Waste Section, Division of Waste
Management, Alternate Source Demonstration, Moore County Construction and Demolition Landfill, NC SWP# 63-
01, NCDEQ to Moore County: September 28, 2017.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), Solid Waste Section, Division of Waste
Management, Groundwater Corrective Action and Landfill Gas Corrective Action, Moore County Closed MSW
Landfill, NC SWP# 63-01, NCDEQ to Moore County: September 28, 2017.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), Solid Waste Section, Division of Waste
Management, Groundwater Corrective Action Milestone Schedule, Moore County Closed MSW Landfill, NC SWP#
63-01, NCDEQ to Moore County: February 13, 2018.
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME), Waste Extents and Soil Cover System Thickness Assessment Report, dated June 30, 2022,
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME), Landfill Gas Vent Installation Report, dated June 30, 2022
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME), Semi -Annual Water Quality Reports, for monitoring during October 2020, April 2021, October
2021, April 2022, and October 2022.
Adamson, D. et al. 2015. Evidence of 7,4-dioxane attenuation at groundwater sites contaminated with chlorinated
solvents and 7,4-dioxane. Environmental Science & Technology 49(11):6510-6518
June 15, 2023 22

Tables

TABLE 1
Active Monitoring Well Construction Information
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
I Identificat
MW-1
06/05/87
508605.64
1854636.41
Ground Surface
Elevation
390.70
Measuring Point
Elevation
392.87
Total Well
Depth
20
Well
DepthEL.Winates
370.70
2
6.97 - 17.07
383.73 - 373.63
Sand
MSW Landfill
MW-2
06/06/87
508508.07
1853819.73
373.39
375.50
20
353.39
2
7.52-17.77
365.87 - 355.62
Sand
MSW Landfill
MW-3
06/06/87
508781.79
1852845.34
362.00
363.82
16.5
345.50
2
5.75 - 15.88
356.25 - 346.12
Sand and Silty Clay
MSW Landfill
MW-4
06/06/87
509793.80
1853641.22
363.40
366.19
15
348.40
2
4.28 -14.09
359.12 - 349.31
Sand and Silty Clay
C&D Landfill
MW-5
06/06/87
510970.55
1853091.84
384.06
386.61
20
364.06
2
6.96-17.21
377.10 - 366.85
Sand and Clayey Sand
Background
MW-6
03/06/95
510385.96
1853881.79
403.50
405.86
20
383.50
2
5.00 - 20.00
398.50 - 383.50
Sand to Silty Sand
MSW Landfill
MW-7
03/06/95
509783.24
1853820.43
399.20
402.01
20
379.20
2
4.00 - 19.00
395.20 - 380.20
Sand, Silt, Silty Sand, Clay
MSW Landfill
MW-8
03/06/95
509384.99
1853844.10
395.20
397.85
20
375.20
2
5.00 - 20.00
390.20 - 375.20
Sand, Silt, Silty Sand, Clay
MSW Landfill
MW-9
03/06/95
508964.80
1854268.28
403.70
406.06
30
373.70
2
15.00 - 30.00
388.70 - 373.70
Silty Sand
MSW Landfill
MW-11SR
06/01/18
510452.38
1852905.36
383.41
386.13
28
355.41
2
18.00 - 28.00
358.13 - 368.13
Clayey Sand
C&D Landfill
MW-11DR
05/31/18
510453.00
1852911.56
383.41
386.36
44
339.41
2
34.00 - 44.00
342.36 - 332.36
Sand
C&D Landfill
MW-13SR
06/24/20
509541.34
1853156.68
383.87
386.57
20
363.87
2
10.00-20.00
373.87 - 363.87
Sand
C&D Landfill
MW-13SD
O6124120
509549.23
1853164.04
383.31
385.99
40
343.31
2
30.00-40.00
353.31-343.31
Sand/Clay
C&D Landfill
MW-14
09/16/96
510056.32
1853641.99
397.88
400.58
20
377.88
2
5.00 - 20.00
392.88 - 377.88
Sand to Silty Sand
Upgradient of C&D Landfill
MW-15
09/19/96
510597.22
1854401.13
429.31
431.10
35
394.31
2
20.00 - 35.00
409.31 - 394.31
Sand to Silty Sand
MSW Landfill
MW-15R
05/29/18
510589.03
1854391.51
428.81
431.48
47
381.81
2
37.00 - 47.00
384.48 - 374.48
Sand
MSW Landfill
MW-17S
05/31/18
509704.03
1852096.70
371.45
374.16
18
353.45
2
8.00 - 18.00
363.45 - 353.45
Sand
C&D Landfill
MW-17D
06/01/18
509693.71
1852101.52
372.05
374.56
34
338.05
2
29.00 - 34.00
343.05 - 338.05
Clay/Sandy-Clay
C&D Landfill
MW-18
06/04/18
509369.85
1852249.28
365.35
368.50
13
352.35
2
5.00 - 13.00
360.35 - 352.35
Gravelly Sand, Sand, Sandy Clay
C&D Landfill
MW-19
06/25/20
509324.26
1852158.78
363.95
366.67
13
350.95
2
5.00-13.00
358.95 - 350.95
Sand
C&D Landfill
GP-10R
O6/25/20
508889.16
1855952.87
431.90
434.21
15
416.90
2
5.00-15.00
426.90 - 416.90
Sand
MSW Landfill
GP-13R
05/31/18
509405.06
1852208.08
367.1
370.29
10
357.10
2
3.00-10.00
364.10 - 357.10
Sand
C&D Landfill
GP-14R
05/30/18
509680.01
1852109.63
372.05
374.78
10
362.05
2
3.00 - 10.00
369.05 - 362.05
Clayey Sand to Sand
C&D Landfill
GP-15R
06/04/18
510038.89
1852041.09
364.85
367.73
10
354.85
2
3.00 -10.00
361.85 - 354.85
Sandy Clay, Gravelly Sand
C&D Landfill
GP-19
06/25/20
510494.25
1853794.49
397.08
399.33
10
387.08
2
5.00-10.00
393.08 - 387.07
Sand
MSW Landfill
Notes:
1.) ft AMSL = feet above mean sea level
2.) ft BGS = feet below ground surface
3.) Well construction information for monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-16S/D collected from boring logs and well construction records from HDR Engineering, Inc. of the
Carolinas July 2006 Water Quality Monitoring Plan. TOC and Ground Elevations are taken from the July 2005
Assessment of Corrective Measures Report and/or well records where available.
4) Well construction information for monitoring well MW-19 obtained from boring logs and well construction records from Golder, Inc.
5) shaded cells denote abandoned wells

TABLE 2
Groundwater Elevation Data
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project Number 4358-20-043D
A
PF Well I'
TO(ft AMSL) n.
366.67
Date(f
�-
WE
�
(MSL) ���
.1
1
(fAMSL(ft)
(fANISE
(ft
A
•�
A
' (
Dft(
.� •�
M0MMeasurement
.1
SL) M
�®
®m
Notes:
1.) ft AMSL = feet above mean sea level 5) NM = not measured
2.) TOC = top of casing
3.) GWE = Groundwater Elevation (calculated)
4.) DTW = Depth to Water

TABLE 3
Summary of Estimated Horizontal Flow Velocities
CAER Report 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project Number 4358-20-043D
Pathway 1
9.80E+00
3.50E-03
35%
0.016
161
Pathway 2
8.80E+00
3.10E-03
35%
0.014
133
Pathway 3
8.40E-01
3.04E-04
35%
0.018
15
Pathway 4
1.80E+01
6.30E-03
35%
0.020
385
Pathway 5
4.20E+00
1.50E-02
35%
0.019
82
Mean Values =
8.33E+00
5.64E-03
35%
0.012
111
Notes:
(1) Facility average Hydraulic Conductivity of 0.0559 cm/sec was calculated from monitoring well slug tests performed by HDR
(2) Effective porosity is an estimated value, actual values will vary
(3) Hydraulic gradient calculated by measuring linear feet along the flow path between contour lines.
(4) Seepage velocity v = (K*i)/ne
TAGreensbo—O\-j-20%358-20-30—County—dfill\Task B-C—Repa62622-cexables.— 6/16=23

TABLE 4
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01 I
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
Constituent/Parameter
f(
Units
M,.,.
"POL
Background
Monitoring Well
MW-5
MW-11DR
MW-13SR
MW-13DR
Active C&D Monitoring
MW-14
Wells
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-18
MW-19
& MNA Performanc
Monitoring
MW-4
Wells I
MW-11SR
M[W-1
MW-2
Closed MSW Monitoring
MW-3
Wells
MW-6
& MNA Performance
MW-7
Monitoring
MW-8
Wells
MW-9
MW-15115R
Antimony
ug/L
06/20/18
0.74
2
--
ND
ND
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
--
--
--
ND
ND
--
--
--
NC21- IMAC = 1 ug/L
ug/L
11/27/18
0.74
2
--
ND
ND
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
EPA MCL = 6 ug/L
ug/L
04/02/19
0.74
2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
0.74
2
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
--
ND
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
04/07/20
0.74
2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
0.74
2
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
04/13/21
0.74
2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/19/21
0.74
2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
04/12/22
0.74
2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/24/22
0.74
2
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
Arsenic
ug/L
--
--
--ND--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
--
--
--
--
--
NC 2L = 10 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
--
--
--
--
--
EPA MCL = 10 ug/L
ug/L
03/10/92
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/20/95
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
ug/L
06/27/95
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
ug/L
10/29/96
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ND
18
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
04/19/00
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
--
--
--
ND
--
11
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
19
ND
ND
10
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
11
ND
ND
ND
10
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
14
17
14
14
11
ug/L
04/26/04
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
12
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
15
ND
ND
ND
14
ug/L
04/04/05
10
10
10
15
10
29
10
ug/L
10/04/05
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
13
15
12
21
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
11
ND
ND
ND
ND
12
ND
ND
11
16
ug/L
10/09/06
--
--
--
ND
--
13
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
14
ND
ND
ND
11
ug/L
04/24/07
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
38
27
ug/L
10/30/07
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.2
J ND
ND
6.9
J 7.8 J
ug/L
04/23/08
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
3.2
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.3 J
ug/L
10/06/08
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.7 J
ug/L
04/13/09
10
ND
5.1
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
8.2
J 17.1
6.6
J 11.4
10.1 J
ug/L
10/15/09
10
5.30 J
6.47
J
5.54 J
6.53
J
2.86
J ND
8.63
J 18.3
11.6
15.9
12.6
ug/L
04/26/10
10
ND
10.8
ND
3.14
J
ND
3.50
J
14.2
31.0
8.54
J 13.4
28.5
ug/L
10/19/10
10
5.16 J
24.9
ND
ND
ND
ND
29.5
33.0
22.6
28.0
26.6
ug/L
04/18/11
--
--
10
ND
--
20.0
--
--
--
--
ND
--
3.29
B
ND
5.35
B
18.7
14.6
B 16.1
B 19.2
14.6 B
ug/L
10/10/11
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.96
J
5.48
J 4.73
J 5.67
J 19.0
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
--
--
10
4.42 B
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
4.31
B 3.32
B
ND
29.4
ND
17.9
B Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
--
--
10
ND
--
6.36
J --
--
--
--
ND
--
2.90
J
ND
2.91
J
9.82
J 21.6
9.74
J 10.7
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
10
3.97 B
ND
5.21 B
2.87
B
ND
4.42
B
17.8
ND
ND
14.7
B Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
--
--
10
ND
--
9.62
J --
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
24.5
32.0
20.3
18.0
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
--
--
10
ND
--
8.25
J --
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
23.3
19.7
15.2
19.5
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
5.4
10
Dry
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.99
J 10.8
14.1
38.6
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
5.4
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
20.3
21.8
ND
8.41
J Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
5.4
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
20.0
ND
32.4
8.73 J
ug/L
04/11/16
5.4
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
12.6
27.0
11.3
38.7
29.6
ug/L
11/30/16
6.8
10
ND
48.1 (ND)
ND
ND
ND
ND
65.8 (ND)
20.4 (ND)
14.9 (ND)
85.6 (41.9)
39.6 (42.4)
(Dissolved)
ug/L
11/30/16
6.8
10
--
--
--
--
14.4
(Verification Event)
ug/L
02/09/17
6.8
10
ND
40.5
--
(Dissolved)
ug/L
02/09/17
6.8
10
--
--
--
39.0
ug/L
04/11/17
6.8
10
ND
7.78
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
10.5
8.67
J ND
53.7
31.8
ug/L
12/12/17
6.8
10
ND
19.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
25.9
21.5
8.49
J 53.2
25.4
ug/L
06/20/18
7.6
--
10
ND
ND
22.7
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
22.8
ND
ND
38.6
ND
ug/L
11/27/18
7.6
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
14.9
ND
38.4
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
7.6
10
--
ND
ND
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
11.7
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
7.6
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
36.5
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
7.6
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
23.8
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
7.6
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
64.8
ND
ug/L
04/13/21
7.6
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
7.6
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
43.9
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
7.6
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.92 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
11.9
ND
ug/L
10/24/22
6.4
20
10
ND
ND
6.7
J ND
8.7
J ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
12
J ND
10
J 68
ND
T1Greensboro1-%-j-020W358-20-043D-C-ty Le 11%Task B-C-Rep-22-caxbbles.- Page 4 of 51

TABLE
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
I onstituent/Parameter
C
Units
?DatefM
DIL
Be
M onit or
I MWEINIF
MW-13DR
Active C&D
MW-14
Monitoring
Wells
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-18
MW-19
Active L;&u
& MNA
Monitoring
for the Closed
MW-4
15
monitoring
Perf
MSW
vvens
anc
07e lis
Lang.
MW-11SR
57
MW-2
27
Closed
MSW Monitoring
MW-3
13
Wells
MW-6
& MNA
Performance
MW-7
Monitoring
MW-8
Wells
MW-9
�N
MW-15115R
Barium
ug/L
03/05/90
NC 2L = 700 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
35
23
73
66
23
EPA MCL = 2000 ug/L
ug/L
03/10/92
30
23
43
69
12
ug/L
04/20/95
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
06/27/95
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/30/07
100
13.5 J
44.4
J
52.8
J
46.6
J
65.8
J
13.8
J
40.1
J
17.0
J
60.3
J
80.2
J
15.5 J
ug/L
04/23/08
100
11.9 J
42.6
J
31.7
J
57.1
J
55.4
J
12.1
J
59.5
J
26.8
J
52.1
J
81.1
J
12.3 J
ug/L
10/06/08
100
12.8 J
45.7
J
41.8
J
40.9
J
58.8
J
13.8
J
42.0
J
31.2
J
51.4
J
83.1
J
12.4 J
ug/L
04/13/09
100
11.5 J
51.3
J
56.0
J
49.5
J
65.8
J
17.2
J
42.6
J
36.7
J
81.6
J
89.8
J
14.9 J
ug/L
10/15/09
100
13.7 J
44.7
J
72.6
J
28.6
J
66.7
J
19.1
J
40.0
J
33.9
J
67.5
J
78.6
J
20.8 J
ug/L
04/26/10
100
9.47 J
49.9
J
54.7
J
43.3
J
66.0
J
19.8
J
39.8
J
33.4
J
67.2
J
80.3
J
11.7 J
ug/L
10/19/10
100
16.6 J
42.4
J
29.5
J
31.4
J
52.6
J
14.9
J
29.5
J
25.2
J
53.9
J
69.7
J
13.6 J
ug/L
04/18/11
100
13.1 J
48.1
J
41.9
J
48.8
J
64.8
J
21.4
J
40.2
J
28.2
J
70.3
J
81.9
J
17.5 J
ug/L
10/10/11
100
14.3 J
47.5
J
71.2
J
46.1
J
66.7
J
22.0
J
39.9
J
30.1
J
71.7
J
74.7
J
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
100
19.5 J
52.1
J
40.5
J
62.7
J
75.0
J
21.7
J
39.8
J
30.1
J
67.5
J
84.9
J
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
100
15.4 J
54.3
J
10.1
J
52.0
J
68.1
J
18.8
J
39.5
J
39.7
J
64.2
J
73.0
J
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
100
14.6 J
49.4
J
26.8
J
40.5
J
60.8
J
20.4
J
42.7
J
36.7
J
78.4
J
86.4
J
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
100
12.4 J
56.5
J
24.5
J
35.8
J
38.3
J
21.1
J
50.5
J
47.1
J
65.3
J
90.1
J
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
100
13.6 J
47.3
J
15.9
J
35.3
J
41.8
J
15.2
J
42.6
J
28.9
J
60.6
J
102
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
1
100
Dry
50.4
J
25.9
J
33.6
J
46.3
J
25.5
J
49.3
J
31.1
J
103
98.4
J
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
1
100
15.6 J
49.2
J
95.6
J
46.6
J
53.3
J
32.9
J
45.0
J
28.4
J
74.7
J
93.7
J
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
1
100
14.7 J
45.8
J
21.2
J
30.4
J
52.1
J
25.2
J
36.6
J
28.6
J
88.8
J
92.8
J
12.6 J
ug/L
04/11/16
1
100
13.7 J
41.5
J
69.3
J
31.9
J
38.8
J
34.0
J
44.4
J
28.6
J
65.5
J
84.0
J
8.38 J
ug/L
11/30/16
1
100
14.4 B
36.7
B
38.3
B
28.6
B
38.2
B
30.0
B
44.5
J
24.2
B
75.1
J
84.2
J
8.70 B
ug/L
04/11/17
1
100
14.5 J
45.3
J
28.5
J
29.9
J
54.5
J
32.6
J
45.0
J
26.6
J
99.7
J
106
9.34 J
ug/L
12/12/17
1
100
12.9 J
43.5
J
35.6
J
34.8
J
55.6
J
36.8
J
47.9
J
28.6
J
77.3
J
98.2
J
14.5 J
ug/L
06/20/18
1.1
--
100
11.7 J
58.2 J
39.8
J
40.3
J
59.9 J
26.7
J
57.0
J
31.8
J
42.7
J
33.3
J
76.3
J
89.3
J
38.6 J
ug/L
11/27/18
1.1
10
--
13.9
53.1
40.4
60.4
68.4
30.5
38.7
31.9
38.9
39.2
50.5
78.8
32.3
ug/L
04/02/19
1.1
10
15.4
49.0
37.8
54.9
98.0
30.4
38.3
33.5
37.8
40.8
54.2
78.4
38.9
ug/L
11/19/19
1.1
10
14.5
59.3
56.9
68.3
16.5
--
53.9
71.2
37.8
54.9
38.5
52.7
38.3
102
117
19.8
ug/L
04/07/20
1.1
10
12.8
54.7
42.2
91.8
10.6
86.7
--
43.0
69.3
NS
NS
NS
42.9
25.7
69
83
40.0
ug/L
10/13/20
1.1
10
15.4
52.7
19.1
44.0
44.6
87.9
33.4
83.8
59.5
25.9
72.8
26.7
34.7
33.9
41.0
34.4
75.6
95.5
27.5
ug/L
04/13/21
1.1
10
32.7
55.0
22
48.3
18.2
136.0
22.4
89.5
103
103.0
89.0
NS
NS
NS
46.0
38.4
66.6
78.2
25.0
ug/L
10/19/21
1.1
10
21.6
51.9
22.9
39.6
44.7
84.2
36.4
78.1
19.8
35.8
67.1
23.7
63
36.7
42.3
33.6
80.0
99.9
42.2
ug/L
04/12/22
1.1
10
--
38.9
55.2
25.1
49.4
43.3
60.9
32.8
88.5
67.1
16.7
66.8
ISIS
NS
NS
37.5
26.1
63.3
87.8
24.1
ug/L
10/24/22
4.4
10
700
49.0
52.0
20
35.0
40.0
72.0
17.0
64.0
22
35.0
57.0
25
54
39
38.0
24.0
87.0
130.0
ND
T1G---%-j-020W358-20-043D -C-ty Le 11%-k B - C- Rp-2--bI-- Page 5 of 51

TABLE 4
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
2L = 2 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
ND
ND
ND ND
k MCL = 5 ug/L
ug/L
03/10/92
ND
ND
ND ND
ug/L
04/20/95
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- --
ug/L
06/27/95
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- --
ug/L
09/22/95
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND --
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- --
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
2
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
1
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
1
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ug/L
10/09/06
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND ND
ug/L
04/24/07
ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ug/L
10/30/07
--
--
1
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND ND
ug/L
04/23/08
1
ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ug/L
10/06/08
1
ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ug/L
10/15/09
--
--
1
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND ND
ug/L
04/26/10
1
ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ug/L
10/19/10
--
--
1
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND ND
ug/L
04/18/11
1
ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ug/L
10/10/11
--
--
1
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND ND
ug/L
04/17/12
--
--
1
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND ND
ug/L
10/09/12
--
--
1
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND ND
ug/L
04/15/13
--
--
1
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND ND
ug/L
09/30/13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ug/L
04/16/14
1
ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ug/L
10/15/14
0.36
1
Dry
ND
ND
ND ND
ug/L
04/15/15
0.36
1
ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ug/L
10/07/15
0.36
1
ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ug/L
04/11/16
0.36
1
ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ug/L
11/30/16
0.36
1
ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ug/L
04/11/17
0.36
1
ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ug/L
12/12/17
0.36
1
ND
--
ND
ND
ND ND
ug/L
06/20/18
0.36
1
ND
0.500
B
ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ug/L
11/27/18
0.36
1
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ug/L
04/02/19
0.36
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ug/L
11/19/19
0.36
1
ND
ND
0.409 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ug/L
04/07/20
0.36
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS NS
ug/L
10/13/20
0.36
1
ND
1.09
1.03
ND
1.93
ND
ND
1.26
ND
ND
1.11
ND ND
ug/L
04/13/21
0.36
1
ND
0.526
J 0.572 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.811 J
ND
ND
ND
NS NS
ug/L
10/09/21
0.36
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS NS
ug/L
04/12/22
0.36
1
ND
0.496
J 0.395 J
ND
1.49
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS NS
ug/L
10/24/22
0.36
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS NS
ND
ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.487 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.685 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.15
0.722 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.585 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
ND
ND
ND
2.16
1.57
NS
1.04
1.25
NS
ND
ND
NS
1.01
ND
NS
ND
ND
k
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1
2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ND
ND
Dry
ND
ND
Dry
ND
ND
Dry
ND
ND
Dry
ND
ND
Dry
ND
ND
Dry
ND
ND
Dry
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.696
J ND
0.734
J ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.67
0.662
J 1.92
0.612
J ND
0.855 J
ND
ND
ND
0.584
J ND
0.615 J
ND
ND
ND
TAGreensboro1-%-j-020W358-20-043D-C-ty Le 11%Task B-C-Rep-22-caxbbles.- PTge 6Of 51

TABLE
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
JConstituent/Parameter
Units
MDate
rDL
ND
MW-13DR
Active C&D Monitoring
MW-14
Wells
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-18
MW-19
Active L;&u
& MNA
Monitoring
for the Closed
MW-4
ND
monitoring
Performanc;
vvens
Wells .
MSW Lang
MW-11SR
M
ND
Closed
MW-2
ND
MSW Monitoring
MW-3
ND
Wells & MNA
MW-6
Performance
MW-7
Monitoring
MW-8
Wells
MW-9
MW-15115R
Chromium
ug/L
03/05/90
NC 2L = 10 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
ND
ND
ND
12
10
EPA MCL = 100 ug/L
ug/L
03/10/92
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
--
ug/L
04/20/95
ND
ND
ND
12
7
ug/L
06/27/95
--
--
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
11
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
19
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/30/07
10
ND
ND
2.4
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/23/08
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.1
J ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/09
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.02 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/10
10
5.84 J
ND
3.07
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
10
ND
ND
1.02
J
1.90 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
10
3.10 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.25
J Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
10
1.65 J
ND
3.37
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.64 B
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
10
ND
ND
2.25
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
10
ND
ND
1.88
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
1.4
10
Dry
ND
5.71
J
1.83 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
1.4
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.64 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
1.4
10
ND
ND
2.97
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/16
1.4
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.36 J
ug/L
11/30/16
1.4
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.42 J
ug/L
04/11/17
1.4
10
ND
ND
2.22
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
1.4
10
ND
ND
1.88
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
1.4
--
10
ND
ND
ND
1.55
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/27/18
1.4
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
1.4
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
1.4
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
1.4
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.46
J
3.68 J
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
1.4
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.59 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/21
1.4
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
1.4
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.04
ND
ND
1.91
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
1.4
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.84 J
ND
ND
2.56
J
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/24/22
1.1
10
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.50
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.2
J ND
T1G---%-j-020W358-20-043D -C-ty Le 11%-k B - C- Rp-2--bI-- Page 7 of 51

TABLE 4
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01 I
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
[Constituent/Parameter
Units
MDate
10
2.13
J
Active C&D Monitoring
ND
Wells
--
--
--
--
Active L;&u
& MNA
Monitoring
for the Closed
ND
monitoring
Performanc;
MSW
vvens
Wells
La nflM
ND
--
Closed
--
MSW Monitoring
--
Wells &
--
MNA Performance
--
Monitoring
--
Wells
--
�N
--
ND
Cobalt
ug/L
06/20/18
1.4
--
NC 2L IMAC = 1 ug/L
ug/L
11/27/18
1.4
10
--
ND
2.03
J
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
1.4
10
ND
2.55
J
ND
ND
1.63 J
ug/L
11/19/19
1.4
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
1.4
10
ND
ND
1.50 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
1.4
10
ND
1.49
J
ND
1.51
J ND
ND
1.48 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/21
1.4
10
--
ND
1.63
J
ND
1.43
J ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/19/21
1.4
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
04/12/22
1.4
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/24/22
1.4
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
Copper
ug/L
5
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--ND
10
ND
ND
NC 2L=1000 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
ND
ND
14
12
ND
EPA MCL = 1300 ug/L
ug/L
03/10/92
ND
ND
ND
110
ND
--
--
ug/L
04/20/95
ND
--
ND
ND
14
11
ug/L
06/27/95
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
10/09/06
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
04/24/07
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
10/30/07
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
04/23/08
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
06/20/18
1.6
--
10
2.28 B
ND
ND
5.70
B
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/27/18
1.6
10
--
ND
ND
ND
3.17
B
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
1.6
10
ND
ND
ND
--
3.37
J
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
1.6
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.96 J
1.76
J
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
1.6
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
1.75
J
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
1.6
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.26 J
ND
2.97 J
1.99
2.03 J
3.81
J
ND
ug/L
04/13/21
1.6
10
ND
ND
1.97
J ND
3.37 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/19/21
1.6
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.20
J
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
04/12/22
1.6
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.47
J
ND
NS
NS
NS
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/24/22
1.6
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
T1Greensboro1-%-j-020W358-20-043D-C-ty Le 11%Task B-C-Rep-22-caxbbles.- Page 8 of 51

TABLE
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
C onstituent/Parameter
Units
MDate
rDL
16
MW-13DR
Active C&D
MW-14
Monitoring
Wells
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-1 8
MW-19
Active L;&u
& MNA
Monitoring
for the Closed
MW-4
14
monitoring
Performanc;
vvens
Wells
MSW Lang
MW-11 1 SIR
1
Closed
MW-2
29
MSW Monitoring
MW-3
6
Wells
MW-6
& MNA
Performance
MW-7
Monitoring
MW-8
Wells
MW-9
MW-15115R
Lead
ug/L
03/05/90
NC 2L = 15 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
EPA MCL = 15 ug/L*
ug/L
03/10/92
14
25
10
39
12
--
--
--
ug/L
04/20/95
ND
--
--
--
--
7
ND
18
16
ug/L
06/27/95
--
--
--
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
13
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
10
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
10
ND
ND
13
ND
ND
19
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
12
ND
14
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ND
11
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
13
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/30/07
10
ND
3.9
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.6
J
5.2
J
6.5
J
2.6
J
2.5 J
ug/L
04/23/08
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
10
ND
ND
9.4
J
ND
ND
ND
2.9
J
4.9
J
ND
ND
2.2 J
ug/L
04/13/09
10
ND
6.3
J
ND
ND
2.1 J
2.3
J 5.4
J
5.2
J
6.5
J
6.4
J
5.5 J
ug/L
10/15/09
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.90
J
ND
ND
2.27 J
ug/L
04/26/10
10
ND
3.82
J
ND
ND
2.47 J
ND
3.17
J
4.54
J
3.95
J
3.09
J
3.89 J
ug/L
10/19/10
10
4.34 J
2.07
J
3.45
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.92
J
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
10
ND
5.09
J
2.00
J
ND
ND
ND
5.57
J
5.07
J
6.87
J
ND
5.19 J
ug/L
10/10/11
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
10
ND
ND
2.26
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.08
J
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
10
ND
3.49
J
2.51
J
ND
ND
ND
3.89
J
2.89
J
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
10
ND
ND
2.11
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
10
ND
4.05
J
2.75
J
ND
ND
ND
6.67
J
5.81
J
5.32
J
3.31
J
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
10
ND
4.17
J
3.06
J
ND
ND
ND
5.24
J
7.02
J
4.95
J
2.83
J
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
2.1
10
Dry
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
2.1
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
2.1
10
ND
ND
4.58
J
3.55
J ND
ND
3.21
J
4.36
J
ND
5.90
J
6.76 J
ug/L
04/11/16
2.1
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.87 J
ug/L
11/30/16
3.1
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
3.1
10
ND
ND
4.48
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
3.1
10
ND
7.48
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.80
J
ND
3.33
J
ND
5.91 J
ug/L
06/20/18
3.1
--
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/27/18
3.1
10
--
ND
3.42
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
3.1
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
23.8
ug/L
11/19/19
3.1
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
3.1
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
3.1
10
ND
6.92
4.49 J
ND
11.2
ND
ND
7.49
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
9.32
J
10.9
9.86
6.58
J
9.94 J
ug/L
04/13/21
3.1
10
ND
8.39
J 9.88 J
ND
7
J
3.98 J
ND
ND
7.9 J
5.15
J
11.5
NS
NS
NS
4.25
J
4.39
J
13.9
10.9
13
ug/L
10/19/21
3.1
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
3.1
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
3.98
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/24/22
3.1
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
T1G---%-j-020W358-20-043D -C-ty Le 11%-k B - C- Rp-2--bI-- Page 9 of 51

TABLE
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
JConstituent/Parameter
Units
MDate
LDL
rM
Be
M onitor
IMWEINIF
0.5
MW-13DR
Active C&D Monitoring
MW-14
Wells
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-18
MW-19
Active L;&u monitoring
& MNA Perf
Monitoring
07e
for the Closed MSW
MW-4
ND
vvens
anc
lis '
Lang.
MW-11SR
R11111W
ND
Closed
MW-2
0.5
MSW Monitoring
MW-3
ND
Wells & MNA
MW-6
Performance
MW-7
Monitoring
MW-8
Wells
MW-9
�N
MW-15115R
Mercury
ug/L
03/05/90
NC 2L = 1 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
0.6
0.6
0.8
2.4
0.6
EPA MCL = 2 ug/L
ug/L
03/10/92
0.7
1.1
ND
6
1.3
--
--
ug/L
04/20/95
ND
--
--
--
ND
ND
1.2
0.3
ug/L
06/27/95
--
--
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
1.01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/30/07
0.2
0.17 J
0.12 J
0.24
0.21
0.16 J
ND
ND
ND
0.17
J ND
ND
ug/L
04/23/08
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.21
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/09
0.2
ND
ND
ND
0.0952 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/10
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
0.2
ND
ND
ND
0.478
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
0.2
ND
ND
ND
0.175 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
0.17
0.2
Dry
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
0.17
0.2
ND
ND
0.0261 J
ND
ND
ND
0.0796 J
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
0.17
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.197 J
ND
ND
ND
0.201
ug/L
04/11/16
0.17
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.274
ND
ND
0.219
ug/L
11/30/16
0.17
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
0.17
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
0.10
0.2
ND
0.0990 J
ND
0.103 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.118
J 0.111 J
ug/L
06/20/18
0.15
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/27/18
0.15
0.2
--
0.281
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.338
ND
0.187
J ND
ug/L
04/02/19
0.15
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
0.15
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
0.15
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
0.15
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/21
0.15
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.476
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
0.15
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.15
0.2
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/24/22
I
0.08
0.2
1
I
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.14 J
ND
ND
0.71
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Nickel Total
ug/L
06/20/18
2.2
--
50
4.03 B
3.14
B
ND
2.30 B
ND
--
ND
ND
NC 2L = 100 ug/L
ug/L
11/27/18
2.2
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
2.2
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
2.2
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
2.2
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
2.2
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
04/13/21
2.2
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/19/21
2.2
10
ND
ND
KID
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
KID
ND
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
04/12/22
2.2
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/24/22
3.3
40
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.3 J
ND
ND
ND
KID
ND
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
T1G---%-j-020W358-20-043D -C-ty Le 11%-k B - C- Rp-2--b1-- Page 10 of 51

TABLE 4
Record of Groundwater Monitoring
Results
(Detected
Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid
Waste Permit
No. 63-01
a -
Aberdeen, Moore County, North
Carolina
I
I
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Background
Monitoring Well
Active C&D Monitoring
Wells
Active L;&u monitoring
& MNA Performance
Monitoring
vvens
Wells
Closed
MSW Monitoring
Wells
& MNA Performance
Monitoring
Wells
-
ConstituentlParameter
Selenium
Units
ug/L
D,
04/28/06
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NC 2L = 20 ug/L
ug/L
10/09/06
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
EPA MCL = 50 ug/L
ug/L
04/24/07
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/30/07
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/23/08
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
--
--
10
ND
--
6.4
B --
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
4.7
B 13.9
B
ND
14.6
B
15.2 B
ug/L
10/15/09
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.02
B
2.47
B
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
--
--
10
ND
--
1.35
J --
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
1.17
J 1.18
J
ND
ND
3.22 J
ug/L
10/19/10
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
2.48 J
1.09
J 0.919
J 2.88
J
1.30
J
4.50
J
1.49 J
ug/L
04/18/11
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
4.90 J
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
2.71
J ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
--
--
10
ND
--
5.54 (ND)
J --
--
--
--
2.86 (ND) J
--
ND
ND
ND
4.55 (ND)
J ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
12.4
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
5.0
--
10
Dry
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
5.0
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
5.0
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/16
5.0
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
6.2
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
6.2
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
6.2
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
6.2
--
10
ND
ND
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/27/18
6.2
10
--
ND
ND
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
6.2
10
--
ND
ND
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
6.2
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
6.2
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
6.2
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/21
6.2
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
6.2
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
6.2
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/24/22
6.2
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Silver
ug/L
04/28/06
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NC 2L = 20 ug/L
ug/L
10/09/06
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
EPA MCL = 100 ug/L"
ug/L
04/24/07
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/30/07
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/23/08
--
--
10
2.8 B
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.6
B
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/09
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.03
J
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
--
--
10
ND
--
5.35
J --
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
3.86
J 5.70
J
5.29
J
5.55
J
2.17 J
ug/L
10/19/10
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
--
--
10
ND
--
5.35
J --
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
5.13
J ND
ND
5.64
J
1.95 J
ug/L
10/10/11
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
9.37
J
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.66
J
ND
2.43
J
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
--
--
10
ND
--
2.19
J --
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
--
--
10
ND
--
4.10
J --
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
4.63
J 5.55
J
4.09
J
2.61
J
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
--
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
1.9
--
10
Dry
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
1.9
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
1.9
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/16
1.9
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
1.9
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
1.9
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.92
J
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
1.9
--
10
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.43
B
ND
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
1.9
--
10
ND
ND
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/27/18
1.9
10
--
ND
ND
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
1.9
10
--
ND
ND
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
1.9
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
1.9
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
1.9
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/21
1.9
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
1.9
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
1.9
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/24/22
1.9
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Page 11 of 51

TABLE 4
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01 I
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
[Constituent/Parameter
Units
MDate
25
2.86
J
Active
C&D
3.60
Monitoring
J
Wells
--
--
--
--
Active L;&u
& MNA
Monitoring
for the Closed
ND
monitoring vvens
Performanc;
Wells
MSW La nflM
3.39 J
--
Closed
--
MSW Monitoring
--
Wells
4.40
& MNA Performance
J 3.09 J
Monitoring
--
Wells
--
�N
--
ND
Vanadium Total
ug/L
06/20/18
1.4
--
NC 2L IMAC = 0.3 ug/L
ug/L
11/27/18
1.4
10
ND
1.65
J
1.95
J
ND
2.90 J
--
--
ug/L
04/02/19
1.4
10
--
ND
1.65
J
1.65
J
--
--
--
--
ND
2.46 J
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
11/19/19
1.4
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
--
1.92
J ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
04/07/20
1.4
10
--
ND
ND
1.55
J
ND
2.02 J
ND
--
ND
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
10/13/20
1.4
10
ND
1.70
J
2.15
ND
4.83
J
ND
ND
2.34 J
ND
ND
2.32 J
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
04/13/21
1.4
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/19/21
1.4
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.2
J ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
04/12/22
1.4
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.97 J
ND
ND
3.72
J ND
NS
NS
NS
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/24/22
1.0
10
0.3
ND
1.70
J
2.2 J
1 J
3
J
1.4
J 2.3 J
2.2 J
ND
2.5
J 4.4 J
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
Zinc
ug/L
5
--
--
--
34
--
--
--
--
--
--26
--
43
79
11
--
--
--
--
--
NC 2L = 1000 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
ND
ND
24
24
ND
EPA MCL = 5000 ug/L
ug/L
03/10/92
30
31
40
31
21
--
--
--
--
ug/L
04/20/95
--
--
--
35
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
47
60
49
51
--
ug/L
06/27/95
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
10/09/06
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
04/24/07
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
10/30/07
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
04/23/08
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
06/20/18
4.4
--
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/27/18
4.4
10
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
4.4
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
4.4
10
ND
ND
5.24
J
ND
ND
22.6
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
4.4
10
ND
27.7
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
4.4
10
ND
ND
455
ND
4.83
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
04/13/21
4.4
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/19/21
4.4
10
ND
ND
26.8 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
04/12/22
4.4
10
--
ND
ND
7.43 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/24/22
8.7
20
1000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
140
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
TAGreensboro1-%-j-020W358-20-043D-C-y Le 11%Task B-C-Rep-22-caxbbles.- Page 12 of 51

TABLE
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
[Constituent/Parameter
Units
MDate
rDL
1469
_W
MW-13DR
Active C&D Monitoring
MW-14
Wells
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-1 8
MW-19
Active L;&u monitoring
& MNA Performanc;
Monitoring
for the Closed
MW-4
419
vvens
Wells
MSW Lang
MW-11 1 SIR
MW-I
239
Closed
MW-2
1110
MSW Monitoring
MW-3
394
Wells &
MW-6
MNA Performance
MW-7
Monitoring
MW-8
Wells
MW-9
MW-15115R
Iron
ug/L
03/05/90
NC 2L = 300 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
7800
700
2510
17000
6500
EPA MCL = 300 ug/L
ug/L
03/10/92
213
463
90
3110
323
--
--
--
--
ug/L
04/20/95
186
--
--
--
--
1340
9600
51200
71500
ug/L
06/27/95
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ug/L
10/09/06
ug/L
04/24/07
ug/L
10/30/07
ug/L
04/23/08
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
06/20/18
22
--
300
72.9 J
83,700
135,000
1,790
144,000
ug/L
11/27/18
22
50
--
ND
88,300
142,000
417
141,000
ug/L
04/02/19
22
50
ND
82,700
134,000
--
--
440
129,000
ug/L
11/19/19
22
50
ND
75,900
152,000
38,400
181
--
15,500
101,000
ug/L
04/07/20
22
50
ND
52,300
141,000
2,670
448
111,000
2,510
101,000
ug/L
10/13/20
22
50
ND
83,800
66,200
7,600
139,000
14,400
2,500
103,000
ND
397
119,000
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
04/13/21
22
50
ND
94,700
78,700
8,000
45,900
9,390
1,470
131,000
60,400
19,300
123,000
NS
NS
NS
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/19/21
22
50
ND
72,500
58,600
8,430
136,000
48,700
2,200
93,400
305
1,130
88,200
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
04/12/22
22
50
--
ND
92,200
84,500
11,000
160,000
214
190
34,100
368
1,530
122,000
NS
NS
NS
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/24/22
20
100
300
ND
66,000
60,000
9,000
120,000
32,000
230
62,000
330
2,700
120,000
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
TAG--0\-f-0204358-20-043D -C-ty Le 11%-k B - C- Rp-2--bI-- Page 13 of 51

TABLE
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
JConstituent/Parameter
Units
MDate
rDL
_W
MW-13DR
Active C&D Monitoring
MW-14
Wells
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-11 8
MW-19
Active L;&u monitoring
& MNA Performanc;
Monitoring
for the Closed
MW-4
ND
vvens
Wells .
MSW Lang
11111W
MW-11 1 SIR
M
31
Closed
MW-2
ND
MSW Monitoring
MW-3
ND
Wells &
MW-6
MNA Performance
MW-7
Monitoring
MW-8
Wells
MW-9
MW-15115R
NU
Manganese
ug/L
03/05/90
NC 2L = 50 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
20
14
50
50
13
EPA MCL = 50 ug/L
ug/L
03/10/92
ND
ND
47
32
ND
--
--
--
--
ug/L
04/20/95
ND
--
--
23
23
1020
173
ug/L
06/27/95
--
--
--
--
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ug/L
10/09/06
ug/L
04/24/07
ug/L
10/30/07
ug/L
04/23/08
--
--
--
--
ug/L
06/20/18
1.5
--
50
ND
200
186
40.2 J
346
ug/L
11/27/18
1.5
10
--
1.73 J
203
185
103
384
ug/L
04/02/19
1.5
10
3.52 J
190
174
--
--
185
443
ug/L
11/19/19
1.5
10
2.68 J
191
212
114
2.71
J --
131
248
ug/L
04/07/20
1.5
10
1.59 J
166
229
99.6
8.4
J 228
53
258
ug/L
10/13/20
1.5
10
2.85 J
180
569
123
183
164
47.8
227
ND
11
294
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
04/13/21
1.5
10
4.80 J
178
683
150
68
104
37.3
241
229
327
372
NS
NS
NS
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/19/21
1.5
10
2.13 J
156
560
71.8
176
181
19.4
154
2.52 J
34
259
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
04/12/22
1.5
10
--
4.62 J
169
683
141
180
27
1.9
J 129
320
3
352
NS
NS
NS
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/24/22
1.3
10
50
7.90 J
150
470
66
130
200
5.6
J 120
ND
84
320
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
TAG--0\-f-0204358-20-043D —C—ty Le 11%—k B - C— Rp-2--bI-- Page 14 of 51

TABLE
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
[Constituent/Parameter
Units
MDate
rDL
_W
MW-13DR
Active C&D
MW-14
Monitoring Wells
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-11 8
MW-19
Active L;&u monitoring
& MNA Performanc;
Monitoring
for the Closed MSW
MW-4
vvens
Wells .
Lang
11111W
MW-11 1 SIR
M
Closed
MW-2
MSW Monitoring
MW-3
Wells
MW-6
& MNA
Performance
MW-7
Monitoring
MW-8
Wells
MW-9
MW-15115R
Acetone
ug/L
03/05/90
NC 2L = 6000 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
ug/L
03/10/92
ug/L
04/20/95
ug/L
06/27/95
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
3085
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ND
541
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
335
390
108
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
728
ND
139
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
185
ND
2628
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
129
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
422
110
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ND
192
119
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
125
113
361
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
1400
123
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
138
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/30/07
100
ND
4.8
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
380
60
16
7.7
5.6
ug/L
04/23/08
100
ND
ND
5.7 J
ND
ND
ND
420
120
220
10
J
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
100
ND
7.6
B
ND
ND
ND
ND
1100
160
56
J
20
B
210
ug/L
04/13/09
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
48
J
240
160
ND
45 J
ug/L
10/15/09
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
78
J
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
80
J
25
J
77
J
8.9
J
140
ug/L
10/19/10
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
180
1700
ND
ND
170
ug/L
04/18/11
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
29
J
36
J
ND
36
J
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
15
J
--
ND
5.0
J
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
10
J
56
J
12
J
18
J
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
290
ND
13
J
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
150
88
J
73
J
12
J
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
94
J
24
J
9.8
J
5.5
J
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
280
36
J
6.3
J
15
J
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
1.2
100
Dry
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
16
J
110
6.6
J
12
J
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
1.2
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
210
110
16
J
7.0
J
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
1.2
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
130
200
6.4
J
2.6
J
98 J
ug/L
04/11/16
1.2
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
290
110
ND
55
J
300
ug/L
11/30/16
10
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
46
J
10
J
ND
19
J
980
ug/L
04/11/17
10
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
20
J
ND
ND
880
ug/L
12/12/17
10
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
11
J
20 J
ug/L
06/20/18
10
--
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
20
B
19
B
11
B
20
B
ND
ug/L
11/27/18
10
20
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
28
190
56
57
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
10
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
12
J
490
21
ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
10
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
12
J
ND
ND
190
ug/L
04/07/20
10
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
26
59
ND
17
J
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
10
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
490
D
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/21
10
20
ND
ND
KID
ND
120
ND
ND
11
J
22
ND
10
NS
NS
NS
46
75
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
10
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
18
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
27
270
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04112/22
10
20
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
18
J
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
27
270
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/24/22
10
20
6000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
14
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
21
ND
ND
ND
TAG--0\-f-0204358-20-043D —C—ty Le 11%—k B - C— Rp-2--bI-- Page 15 of 51

TABLE
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
C onstituent/Parameter
Units
MDate
rDL
MW-13DR
Active C&D Monitoring
MW-14
Wells
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-11 8
MW-19
Active L;&u monitoring
& MNA Performanc;
Monitoring
for the Closed MSW
MW-4
vvens
Wells
Lang
MW-11 1 SIR
MW-2
Closed
MSW Monitoring
MW-3
Wells &
MW-6
MNA Performance
MW-7
Monitoring
MW-8
Wells
MW-9
MW-15115R
Benzene
ug/L
03/05/90
NC 2L = 1 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
EPA MCL = 5 ug/L
ug/L
03/10/92
ug/L
04/20/95
ug/L
06/27/95
ND
3.2
8.8
9.8
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6
6
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ND
59
ND
5
6
--
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6
9
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6
7
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
5
ND
ND
6.5
11
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ND
6.6
ND
6.4
11
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
8.5
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
5.3
ND
ND
ND
6.2
10
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
11
ug/L
03/14/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
3
ND
3
ND
ND
4
11
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.6
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
5.2
9.2
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.1
9.6
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
8
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.8
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
8.9
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
8.4
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.8
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.9
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.5
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.6
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.5
ug/L
04/24/07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.1
3.5
3.3
ug/L
10/30/07
1
ND
2.2
ND
ND
1.2
ND
3.0
1.5
2.7
3.2
4.2
ug/L
04/23/08
1
ND
2.5
ND
ND
0.92
J
ND
ND
2.8
0.84
J 4.0
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.97
J
ND
ND
2.1
2.2
2.5
6.4
ug/L
04/13/09
1
ND
2.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.6
ND
3.1
3.4
5.9
ug/L
10/15/09
1
ND
2.2
0.40 J
1.1
1.4
ND
3.4
1.3
2.9
3.5
4.0
ug/L
04/26/10
1
ND
2.5
ND
ND
1.1
ND
2.2
2.4
3.1
3.6
5.2
ug/L
10/19/10
1
ND
2.3
ND
ND
1.0
ND
3.1
ND
3.0
3.6
4.6
ug/L
04/18/11
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.80
J
3.9
ND
4.1
ug/L
10/10/11
1
ND
2.2
ND
ND
1.0
ND
3.4
--
3.4
3.5
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
1
ND
2.3
ND
0.81
J
1.0
ND
3.6
1.2
4.3
3.9
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
1
ND
2.0
ND
0.69
J
1.2
ND
2.2
2.2
3.6
4.0
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
1
ND
2.1
ND
ND
0.74
J
ND
2.4
1.1
3.6
4.2
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
1
ND
2.1
ND
ND
0.50
J
ND
2.2
2.7
2.4
3.4
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
1
ND
2.0
ND
ND
0.67
J
ND
2.9
1.8
2.8
3.3
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
0.15
1
Dry
1.9
ND
ND
0.81
J
ND
2.8
1.6
3.9
3.4
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
0.15
1
ND
1.2
ND
ND
0.81
J
ND
1.5
0.69
J
1.9
2.9
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
0.15
1
ND
2.4
ND
ND
0.80
J
ND
3.9
1.6
3.1
3.9
6.3
ug/L
04/11/16
0.15
1
ND
2.2
ND
ND
0.54
J
ND
2.0
0.64
J
3.5
3.8
2.8
ug/L
11/30/16
0.15
1
ND
2.0
ND
ND
0.45
J
ND
2.6
1.4
2.9
2.9
3.6
ug/L
04/11/17
0.15
1
ND
2.2
ND
ND
1.2
ND
2.9
ND
3.9
4.1
3.4
ug/L
12/12/17
0.15
1
ND
--
1.4
ND
--
0.87
J
0.60
J
ND
2.4
1.1
2.7
3.5
4.4
ug/L
06/20/18
0.15
1
ND
1.2
1.6
ND
2.4
ND
1.0
ND
2.5
1.1
3.3
3.4
1.1
ug/L
11/27/18
0.15
1
--
ND
2.0
2.0
ND
2.8
ND
ND
ND
3.3
0.75
J
2.3
3.6
1.5
ug/L
04/02/19
0.15
1
ND
2.1
1.6
ND
2.7
ND
0.50
J
ND
3.4
1.1
J
2.7
3.4
1.8
ug/L
11/19/19
0.15
1
ND
1.6
2.3
ND
ND
--
ND
2.8
0.48
J
0.97
J
ND
3.7
1.6
2.9
3.8
5.7
(Verification Event)
ug/L
01/08/20
0.57
1
ND
KID
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.5
ug/L
04/07/20
0.15
1
ND
1.6
ND
ND
1.7
ND
ND
1.6
ND
3.1
ND
ND
ND
1.4
ND
2.5
3.6
1.5
(Verification Event)
ug/L
06/05/20
0.15
1
ND
KID
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.2
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
0.15
1
ND
1.9
ND
ND
2.2
ND
ND
0.99 J
ND
ND
3.2
ND
0.54
J
ND
2.5
ND
2.8
4.0
1.2
ug/L
04/13/21
0.15
1
ND
2.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.2
ND
ND
2.7
NS
NS
NS
2.6
1
3.2
3.2
0.8 J
ug/L
10/19/21
0.15
1
ND
1.9
KID
ND
1.7
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.6
ND
ND
ND
1.6
1.1
2.1
2.2
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.15
1
--
ND
1.7
ND
ND
1.9
ND
ND
0.87 J
ND
ND
2.4
NS
NS
NS
2.3
ND
2.2
3.2
0.94 J
I
ug/L
I
10/24/22
I
0.15
I
1
I
1
I
ND
I
1.7
I
0.54 J
ND
1.9
ND
ND
0.71 J
ND
ND
I
2.2
ND
I
0.86
J
ND
2.2
0.8
J
2.3
3.7
0.72 J
I
TAG--0\-f-0204358-20-043D -C-ty Le 11%-k B - C- Rp-2--bI-- Page 16 of 51

TABLE
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid
Aberdeen, Moore County, North
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
mqm
Detected Monitoring
C c onstituent/Parameter
Waste Permit
Carolina
Units
No. 63-01
"Dater
WP('L
OL
SWSL
Background
Monitoring Well
MW-5
MW-11DR
MW-13SR
MW-13DR
Active C&D
MW-14
Monitoring
Wells
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-11 8
MW-19
Active L;&u monitoring
& MNA Performanc
Monitoring
for the Closed MSW
MW-4
vvens
Wells '
Lan
A
MW-11SR
MW-2
Closed
MSW Monitoring
MW-3
Wells
MW-6
& MNA
Performance
MW-7
Monitoring
MW-8
Wells
MW-9
MW-15115R
'lorobenzene
ug/L
03/05/90
NC 2L = 50 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
EPA MCL = 100 ug/L
ug/L
03/10/92
ug/L
04/20/95
ug/L
06/27/95
ND
ND
ND
6.5
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.5
ND
ug/L
04130/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.4
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.1
ND
ug/L
04127/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.1
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
7.1
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
3
ND
ND
ND
ND
6
ND
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
5.5
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
12
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.3
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
13
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
10.5
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
8.6
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
8.6
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
10.8
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
10.9
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
11.9
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
9
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
9.1
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.8
ND
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
9.1
ND
ug/L
10/30/07
3
ND
3.0
ND
ND
4.0
ND
0.93
J
0.98
J
2.4
J
9.2
0.48 J
ug/L
04/23/08
3
ND
2.7
J
ND
ND
2.5
J
ND
ND
0.45
J
ND
9.9
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
3
ND
2.1
J
ND
ND
2.6
J
ND
ND
0.93
J
ND
9.0
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
3
ND
2.9
J
ND
ND
3.4
ND
0.71
J
ND
1.1
J
11
ND
ug/L
10/15/09
3
ND
3.2
ND
8.4
3.8
ND
1.2
J
1.0
J
2.9
J
11
0.57 J
ug/L
04/26/10
3
ND
3.2
ND
ND
2.7
J
ND
0.81
J
0.61
J
1.0
J
11
ND
ug/L
10/19/10
3
ND
3.0
ND
ND
3.1
ND
0.99
J
ND
1.5
J
10
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
3
ND
3.2
ND
ND
2.6
J
ND
ND
0.81
J
2.7
J
7.8
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
3
ND
3.9
ND
6.7
3.0
ND
1.6
J
--
3.6
9.6
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
3
ND
3.6
ND
6.3
2.8
J
ND
1.4
J
0.86
J
2.3
J
12
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
3
ND
3.5
ND
5.6
3.1
ND
1.3
J
1.4
J
2.5
J
11
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
3
ND
3.1
ND
ND
1.9
J
ND
1.1
J
0.41
J
1.1
J
10
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
3
ND
2.5
J
ND
ND
1.2
J
ND
1.2
J
1.0
J
0.64
J
9.2
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
3
ND
3.3
ND
ND
1.8
J
ND
1.2
J
0.75
J
0.74
J
9.1
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
0.17
3
Dry
2.6
J
ND
1.6
J 2.1
J
ND
0.96
J
1.4
J
3.1
10
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
0.17
3
ND
2.7
J
ND
ND
2.1
J
ND
0.69
J
ND
1.1
J
10
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
0.17
3
ND
2.6
J
ND
ND
2.3
J
ND
1.2
J
1.8
J
3.6
9.9
0.64 J
ug/L
04/11/16
0.17
3
ND
2.6
J
ND
ND
1.2
J
ND
0.74
J
ND
2.1
J
10
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
0.17
3
ND
2.3
J
ND
ND
1.4
J
ND
1.0
J
1.4
J
3.1
8.4
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
0.17
3
ND
2.6
J
ND
ND
3.3
ND
1.4
J
ND
4.6
12
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
0.17
3
ND
--
1.2
J
ND
--
7.1
2.1
J
ND
ND
1.4
J
4.0
10
0.62 J
ug/L
06/20/18
0.17
3
ND
0.62 J
2.9
J
ND
1.3 J
ND
2.8
J
ND
1.8
J
0.93
J
2.8
J
10
0.40 J
ug/L
11/27/18
0.17
1
--
ND
0.97 J
3.5
ND
1.0
ND
0.90
J
ND
1.6
0.46
J
0.91
J
7.4
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
0.17
1
ND
1.2
3.4
ND
1.0
ND
1.3
ND
1.4
ND
1.2
9.3
0.44 J
ug/L
11/19/19
0.17
1
ND
0.90 J
5.1
ND
ND
--
ND
1.3
3.7
2.6
ND
1.9
4.1
6.1
11
0.91 J
ug/L
04/07/20
0.17
1
ND
ND
5.3
ND
ND
1.2
ND
1.6
NS
NS
NS
1.2
ND
1.9
9.6
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
0.17
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.8
ND
ND
0.88
J
ND
ND
1.9
ND
1.2
ND
1.6
ND
4.3
8.9
ND
ug/L
04/13/21
0.17
1
ND
1.3
ND
ND
1.5
ND
ND
0.91
J
KID
0.53 J
1.6
NS
NS
NS
1.5
0.9
J
3.8
10.0
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
0.17
1
ND
1.2
ND
ND
5.2
ND
ND
0.93
J
KID
ND
1.2
NS
2.6
ND
1.7
1.9
J
6.7
6.2
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.17
1
--
ND
1.6
2.2
ND
7.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
3.3
7.6
ND
ug/L
10/24/22
0.17
1
50
ND
2
1.8
ND
8.4
ND
ND
0.83
J
ND
ND
2.1
1.8
3.4
ND
1.6
3.1
6.9
13.0
ND
TAG--0\-f-0204358-20-043D -C-ty Le 11%-k B - C- Rp-2--bI-- Page 17 of 51

TABLE
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
JConstituent/Parameter
Units
MDate
rDL
_W
MW-13DR
Active C&D Monitoring
MW-14
Wells
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-11 8
MW-19
Active L;&u monitoring
& MNA Performanc;
Monitoring
for the Closed
MW-4
vvens
Wells .
MSW Lang
11111W
MW-11 1 SIR
M
Closed
MW-2
MSW Monitoring
MW-3
Wells
MW-6
& MNA Performance
MW-7
Monitoring
MW-8
Wells
MW-9
MW-15115R
Chloroethane
ug/L
03/05/90
NC 2L = 3000 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
ug/L
03/10/92
ug/L
04/20/95
ug/L
06/27/95
13.3
4.2
6.6
8.5
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
12
14
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ND
23
14
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
23
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
17
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
19
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
16
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
15
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6
ND
ND
ND
2
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/30/07
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.3
J ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/23/08
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
10
ND
1.2 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.8
J 0.55 J
0.78
J
1.3
J 2.5 J
ug/L
04/13/09
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.1
J
ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/09
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/10
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.54
J
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
10
ND
0.65 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.79
J
ND
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
0.23
10
Dry
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
0.23
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
0.23
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/16
0.23
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
0.23
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
0.23
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
0.23
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.65 J
ug/L
06/20/18
0.23
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/27/18
0.23
1
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
0.23
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
0.23
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
0.23
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
0.23
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/21
0.23
1
ND
ND
KID
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
0.23
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.23
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/24/22
0.23
1
ND
ND
KID
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
TAG--0\-f-0204358-20-043D -C-ty Le 11%-k B - C- Rp-2--bI-- Page 18 of 51

TABLE 4
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid
Aberdeen, Moore County, North
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
onstituent/Parameter
Waste Permit
Carolina
Units
No. 63-01
"Dater
--
WP('L
--
--
Monitoring Well
MW-5
ND
MW-11DR
--
MW-13SR
--
MW-13DR
--
Active C&D
MW-14
ND
Monitoring
Wells
MW-17S
--
MW-17D
--
MW-11 8
--
MW-19
--
Monitoring
for the Closed
MW-4
ND
Wells '
MSW Lan
MW-11SR 1111111VI-MI
--
ND
MW-2
ND
Closed
MSW Monitoring
MW-3
ND
Wells &
MW-6
ND
MNA Performance
MW-7
ND
Monitoring
MW-8
ND
Wells
MW-9
ND
I
MW-15115R
ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
04/24/07
NC 2L = 20 ug/L
ug/L
04/28/07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
EPA MCL = 600 ug/L
ug/L
10/09/07
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/30/07
5
ND
2.7
J
ND
ND
0.75
J
ND
ND
ND
0.81
J
0.61
J
ND
ug/L
04/23/08
5
ND
2.1
J
ND
ND
0.43
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.69
J
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
5
ND
1.5
J
ND
ND
0.42
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.64
J
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
5
ND
2.3
J
ND
ND
0.64
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.73
J
ND
ug/L
10/15/09
5
ND
2.2
J
ND
0.62
J
0.67
J
ND
ND
ND
0.81
J
0.69
J
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
5
ND
2.0
J
ND
ND
0.50
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.82
J
ND
ug/L
10/19/10
5
ND
2.1
J
ND
ND
0.53
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.88
J
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
5
ND
2.0
J
ND
ND
0.43
J
ND
ND
ND
0.51
J
0.67
J
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
5
ND
1.9
J
ND
0.47
J
0.49
J
ND
ND
0.86
J
0.49
J
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
5
ND
2.0
J
ND
0.49
J
0.64
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.66
J
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
5
ND
2.0
J
ND
ND
0.49
J
ND
ND
ND
0.48
J
0.76
J
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
5
ND
1.7
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.65
J
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
5
ND
1.2
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.72
J
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
5
ND
1.7
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.68
J
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
0.19
5
Dry
1.3
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.59
J
0.58
J
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
0.19
--
5
ND
--
--
--
1.4
J
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.51
J
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
0.19
5
ND
1.1
J
ND
ND
0.42
J
ND
ND
ND
0.65
J
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/16
0.19
5
ND
1.0
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
0.19
5
ND
0.92
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
0.19
--
5
ND
--
--
--
0.94
J
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.57
J
ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
0.19
--
5
ND
--
--
--
0.82
J
--
--
--
--
ND
--
0.44
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.59
J
ND
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
0.19
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/27/18
0.19
1
--
ND
ND
1.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
0.19
1
ND
ND
1.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
0.19
1
ND
ND
1.8
ND
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.49
J 0.84
J
0.41
J
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
0.19
1
ND
ND
1.3
ND
ND
0.55 J
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
0.19
1
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.6
ND
ND
0.52 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.54
J
ND
ug/L
04/13/21
0.19
1
--
ND
0.51 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.55 J
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
0.19
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.8
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.91
J
ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.19
1
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/24/22
0.19
1
20
ND
0.47 J
ND
ND
2.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.44
J 0.67
J
ND
ND
TAGreensboro1580\Proj-0204358-20-043D-C-ty Le 11%Task B-C-Rep-22-caxbbles.- Page 19 of 51

TABLE
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
C onstituent/Parameter
Units
MDate
rDL
MW-13DR
Active C&D Monitoring
MW-14
Wells
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-1 8
MW-19
Active L;&u monitoring
& MNA Performanc;
Monitoring
for the Closed MSW
MW-4
vvens
Wells
Lang
MW-11 1 SIR
Closed
MW-2
MSW Monitoring
MW-3
Wells &
MW-6
MNA Performance
MW-7
Monitoring
MW-8
Wells
MW-9
MW-15115R
1,4-uichlorobenzene
ug/L
03/05/90
NC 2L = 6 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
EPA MCL = 75 ug/L
ug/L
03/10/92
ug/L
04/20/95
ug/L
06/27/95
ND
3.3
2
7.4
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
6
ND
ND
ND
7
6
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
7.8
ND
ND
ND
7
6.1
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.1
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
9.7
ND
ND
ND
5.2
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
8.7
ND
ND
ND
5.9
5.6
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
21
ug/L
03/14/00
ND
2
ND
ND
3
ND
ND
ND
ND
4
ND
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
7.5
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.4
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
9.5
ND
ND
ND
10
6.3
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
6.7
ND
ND
ND
5.1
5.9
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.6
8.3
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.9
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.7
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.3
7.5
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.8
7.8
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
5.1
ND
ND
ND
5.9
6.9
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.1
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.6
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.8
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6
ug/L
04/24/07
ND
5.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.5
5.7
ug/L
10/30/07
1
ND
5.7
ND
ND
1.9
ND
2.0
0.49
J
4.0
3.0
3.3
ug/L
04/23/08
1
ND
5.5
ND
ND
1.8
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.2
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
1
ND
4.9
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.5
ND
3.6
5.8
ug/L
04/13/09
1
ND
6.9
ND
ND
2.3
ND
1.6
ND
0.97
J
4.2
5.9
ug/L
10/15/09
1
ND
5.5
ND
ND
2.6
ND
3.4
1.6
4.1
3.7
5.3
ug/L
04/26/10
1
ND
6.0
ND
ND
2.0
ND
1.8
1.2
0.67
J
3.9
4.9
ug/L
10/19/10
1
ND
4.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.8
3.9
5.3
ug/L
04/18/11
1
ND
5.0
ND
ND
1.5
ND
1.7
0.92
J
3.0
3.0
5.4
ug/L
10/10/11
1
ND
5.1
ND
0.82
J ND
ND
4.0
--
4.1
3.1
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
1
ND
5.2
ND
ND
2.2
ND
4.3
1.1
2.6
4.0
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
1
ND
5.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.7
1.8
3.3
4.9
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
1
ND
4.7
ND
ND
1.9
ND
3.2
0.74
J
1.1
3.9
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
1
ND
4.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.0
1.4
0.41
J
3.9
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
1
ND
4.7
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.1
0.83
J
0.60
J
3.7
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
0.19
1
Dry
4.0
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.4
1.6
4.1
3.3
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
0.19
1
ND
4.0
-
0.45 J
ND
ND
ND
1.2
0.58
J
0.72
J
3.4
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
0.19
1
ND
3.9
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.3
1.4
5.4
3.3
7.8
ug/L
04/11/16
0.19
1
ND
4.8
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.4
ND
2.3
3.1
5.4
ug/L
11/30/16
0.19
1
ND
3.5
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.9
1.3
3.5
2.5
4.8
ug/L
04/11/17
0.19
1
ND
4.4
-
ND
ND
1.7
ND
2.8
0.63
J
6.1
3.6
5.0
ug/L
12/12/17
0.19
1
ND
--
2.7
-
ND
--
0.97
J 1.2
ND
2.4
1.3
4.6
2.7
5.1
ug/L
06/20/18
0.19
1
ND
1.7
4.3
ND
2.8
ND
1.9
ND
2.9
0.72
J
3.4
2.6
0.89 J
ug/L
11/27/18
0.19
1
--
ND
2.1
4.2
ND
2.3
ND
0.53 J
ND
2.6
ND
1.2
2.7
0.89 J
ug/L
04/02/19
0.19
1
ND
2.9
4.2
ND
2.6
ND
0.74 J
ND
2.0
ND
1.2
2.6
1.3
ug/L
11/19/19
0.19
1
ND
2.0
5.6
ND
ND
--
0.46 J
2.9
0.45
J 1.2
ND
2.3
3.0
6.2
2.9
5.8
ug/L
04/07/20
0.19
1
ND
2.1
5.1
ND
ND
2.1
ND
2.9
NS
NS
NS
1.3
ND
2.5
2.6
0.92 J
ug/L
10/13/20
0.19
1
ND
2.6
ND
ND
5.1
ND
ND
1.8
ND
ND
3.1
ND
0.59 J
ND
1.7
ND
5.3
3.1
0.73 J
ug/L
04/13/21
0.19
1
ND
3.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.0
ND
ND
2.4
NS
NS
NS
1.6
0.81
J
3.1
2.7
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
0.19
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.6
ND
ND
ND
1.5
0.84
J
5.1
ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.19
1
--
ND
2.8
ND
ND
5.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
2.2
ND
3.0
2.3
ND
ug/L
10/24/22
0.19
1
6
ND
2.8
1.2
ND
5.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.5
ND
ND
ND
1.9
1.7
4.8
ND
ND
T1G---%-j-020W358-20-043D -C-ty Le 11%-k B - C- Rp-2--bI-- Page 20 of 51

TABLE
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
C onstituent/Parameter
Units
MDate
rDL
MW-13DR
Active C&D
MW-14
Monitoring
Wells
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-11 8
MW-19
Active L;&u monitoring
& MNA Performanc;
Monitoring
for the Closed MSW
MW-4
vvens
Wells
Lang
MW-11 1 SIR
MW-2
Closed
MSW Monitoring
MW-3
Wells
MW-6
& MNA
Performance
MW-7
Monitoring
MW-8
Wells
MW-9
MW-15115R
1,1,-L)ichloroethane
ug/L
03/05/90
NC 2L = 6 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
ug/L
03/10/92
ug/L
04/20/95
ug/L
06/27/95
--
7.9
9.3
13.4
9.6
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
9
ND
18
10
19
12
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
11
ND
14
ND
10
--
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
--
70
7
ND
7
80
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
14
74
5
ND
6
72
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
12
64
6.2
8.3
7.5
72
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
45
8.1
ND
5.3
60
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
8.4
50
ND
ND
ND
46
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
9.7
37
ND
ND
5.6
39
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
--
12
ND
ND
ND
24
ug/L
03/14/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
4
ND
12
ND
ND
ND
20
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
5.9
--
19
ND
ND
ND
23
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
909
ND
ND
ND
24
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
5.5
9.2
ND
ND
ND
23
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
16
ND
6
ND
22
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
5.5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
5.7
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
9.5
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
11.7
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
10.7
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
8.5
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
11.5
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
10.7
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
10.1
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
17.7
ug/L
04/24/07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.9
ug/L
10/30/07
5
ND
1.0
J
0.69 J
ND
1.1
J
ND
1.4
J
0.38
J 4.3
J
0.51
J
3.6 J
ug/L
04/23/08
5
ND
1.2
J
ND
ND
0.84
J
ND
ND
0.76
J ND
0.87
J
1.0 J
ug/L
10/06/08
5
ND
1.2
J
ND
ND
0.61
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.83
J
7.4
ug/L
04/13/09
5
ND
0.79
J
ND
ND
0.77
J
ND
0.67
J
ND
0.65
J
0.74
J
4.7 J
ug/L
10/15/09
5
ND
0.71
J
0.78 J
ND
0.76
J
ND
1.1
J
ND
1.2
J
0.45
J
2.4 J
ug/L
04/26/10
5
ND
0.64
J
ND
ND
0.56
J
ND
0.51
J
ND
0.86
J
0.49
J
2.8 J
ug/L
10/19/10
5
ND
0.68
J
ND
ND
0.59
J
ND
0.75
J
ND
0.74
J
0.59
J
2.7 J
ug/L
04/18/11
5
ND
0.69
J
ND
ND
0.47
J
ND
0.51
J
ND
1.0
J
0.50
J
2.0 J
ug/L
10/10/11
5
ND
0.78
J
0.42 J
ND
0.53
J
ND
0.91
J
--
1.0
J
0.45
J
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
5
ND
0.66
J
ND
ND
0.51
J
ND
0.87
J
ND
1.0
J
0.40
J
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
5
ND
0.58
J
ND
ND
0.64
J
ND
0.46
J
ND
0.75
J
0.55
J
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
5
ND
0.49
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.53
J
ND
0.85
J
0.45
J
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.49
J
0.42
J ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.53
J
ND
0.45
J
0.42
J
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
0.13
5
Dry
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.50
J
ND
0.87
J
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
0.13
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
0.13
5
ND
0.73
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.58
J
ND
0.62
J
ND
1.1 J
ug/L
04/11/16
0.13
5
ND
0.66
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.61
J
ND
0.90 J
ug/L
11/30/16
0.13
5
ND
0.59
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.70
J
ND
0.77 J
ug/L
04/11/17
0.13
5
ND
0.61
J
ND
ND
0.44
J
ND
ND
ND
1.1
J
ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
0.13
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.46
J
ND
0.66 J
ug/L
06/20/18
0.13
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.49
J
ND
ND
ug/L
11/27/18
0.13
1
--
ND
0.64 J
0.50
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.93 J
ug/L
04/07/20
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
0.13
1
ND
0.43 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.56
J
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/21
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
0.56
J
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.41
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
T1G---%-j-020W358-20-043D -C-ty Le 11%-k B - C- Rp-2--bI-- Page 21 of 51

TABLE 4
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01 I
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
onstituent/Parameter
Units
MDaterDL
--
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
Active L;&u
Monitoring
for the Closed
ND
monitoring
vvens
Wells
MSW Lang
--
ND
ND
Closed
MSW Monitoring
ND
Wells
ND
& MNA
Performance
ND
Monitoring
ND
Wells
ND
ND
--
1
ND
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/L
10/30/07
NC 2L = 0.4 ug/L
ug/L
04/23/08
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
EPA MCL = 5 ug/L
ug/L
10/06/08
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/09
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/10
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
0.21
1
Dry
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
0.21
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
0.21
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/16
0.21
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
0.21
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
0.21
--
1
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
0.21
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
0.21
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/27/18
0.21
1
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
0.21
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
0.21
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
0.21
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
0.21
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/21
0.21
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
0.21
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.21
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.21
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
04/28/06
--
--
ND
16.3
ND
ND
6.4
ND
19.6
ND
ND
ND
18.4
NC 2L = 70 ug/L
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
17.3
ND
ND
5.1
ND
14.3
9.5
ND
9.3
19.4
EPA MCL = 70 ug/L
ug/L
04/24/07
--
ND
19.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
15.3
ND
ND
ND
7.3
ug/L
10/30/07
5
ND
20
4.4
J
ND
5.1
0.35
J
14
6.4
3.0
J
1.6
J
17
ug/L
04/23/08
5
ND
20
ND
ND
3.0
J
ND
3.8
J
3.1
J
ND
2.2
J
3.2 J
ug/L
10/06/08
5
ND
14
ND
ND
2.8
J
ND
5.1
5.8
ND
2.5
J
12
ug/L
04/13/09
5
ND
14
ND
ND
3.7
J
ND
6.1
ND
ND
2.9
J
12
ug/L
10/15/09
5
ND
17
6.2
1.9
J
4.6
J
0.41
J
15
5.1
5.0
1.8
J
16
ug/L
04/26/10
5
ND
13
0.60
J
ND
2.8
J
0.43
J
7.5
3.2
J
ND
2.3
J
7.2
ug/L
10/19/10
5
ND
13
ND
ND
3.0
J
ND
8.4
ND
ND
2.8
J
10
ug/L
04/18/11
5
ND
12
ND
ND
2.8
J
ND
6.8
3.4
J
ND
1.9
J
11
ug/L
10/10/11
5
ND
12
3.0
J
1.5
J
2.6
J
ND
13
--
2.8
J
1.6
J
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
5
ND
11
1.8
J
1.4
J
2.2
J
0.39
J
16
2.8
J
ND
1.6
J
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
5
ND
7.0
ND
1.5
J
2.5
J
ND
9.1
3.2
J
ND
2.0
J
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
5
ND
7.3
ND
ND
1.7
J
ND
11
1.2
J
ND
1.7
J
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
5
ND
4.0
J
ND
ND
1.2
J
ND
5.6
2.7
J
ND
1.7
J
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
5
ND
6.7
ND
ND
1.6
J
ND
6.8
1.6
J
ND
2.1
J
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
0.15
5
Dry
5.3
0.43
J
0.70
J
1.9
J
ND
4.3
J
2.5
J
ND
1.2
J
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
0.15
5
ND
3.4
J
-
3.1
J
ND
2.0
J
ND
1.6
J
0.47
J
ND
0.89
J
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
0.15
5
ND
4.3
J
-
ND
ND
1.7
J
ND
2.6
J
2.7
J
ND
0.69
J
1.5 J
ug/L
04/11/16
0.15
5
ND
3.1
J
-
1.0
J
ND
0.88
J
ND
2.0
J
0.49
J
0.50
J
0.85
J
0.42 J
ug/L
11/30/16
0.15
5
ND
3.6
J
0.58
J
ND
0.68
J
ND
2.0
J
2.1
J
0.52
J
0.63
J
0.53 J
ug/L
04/11/17
0.15
5
ND
3.0
J
ND
ND
1.9
B
ND
2.5
B
ND
0.66
B
0.60
B
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
0.15
5
ND
--
2.2
J
ND
1.1
J
0.81
J
ND
0.68
J
1.8
J
2.0
J
0.84
J
1.0 J
ug/L
06/20/18
0.15
5
ND
2.6 J
3.0
J
ND
1.6 J
ND
1.2
J
ND
4.4
J
1.0
J
ND
0.54
J
1.9 J
ug/L
11/27/18
0.15
1
--
ND
3.6
3.0
0.80
J
1.8
ND
ND
ND
3.3
0.64
J
ND
1.0
1.6
ug/L
04/02/19
0.15
1
ND
3.3
2.3
ND
1.1
ND
0.44
J
ND
1.3
ND
ND
1.3
2.5
ug/L
11/19/19
0.15
1
ND
2.4
3.9
1.8
ND
--
1.5
1.1
0.72
J
0.84
J
ND
1.5
2.0
ND
0.43
J
0.76 J
ug/L
04/07/20
0.15
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.9
ND
ND
--
--
1.9
ND
ND
ND
2.1
ug/L
10/13/20
0.15
1
ND
3.0
ND
0.96
J 1.7
ND
ND
3.8
ND
ND
1.7
ND
ND
ND
3.1
7.8
0.43
J
0.74
J
1.6
ug/L
04/13/21
0.15
1
ND
3.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.9
1.5
1.9
1.2
NS
NS
NS
1.2
0.61
J
0.71
J
1.2
2.5
ug/L
10/19/21
0.15
1
ND
3.3
1
ND
ND
1.3
ND
1.8
ND
ND
1
ND
0.68
J
ND
2.2
0.98
J
ND
J
ND
2.4
ug/L
04/12/22
0.15
1
--
ND
3.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.8
ND
ND
1.7
NS
NS
NS
1.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/24/22
0.15
1
70
ND
2.7
1.2
0.86
J 2.2
ND
ND
1.5
ND
0.57
J
0.84 J
ND
ND
ND
1.1
1.4
ND
ND
1.0
T1Greensboro1-%-j-020W358-20-043D-C-ty Le 11%Task B-C-Rep-22-caxbbles.- Page 22 of 51

TABLE
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid
Aberdeen, Moore County, North
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
111111111M
Detected Monitoring
I( onstituent/Parameter
Waste Permit
Carolina
Units
No. 63-01
"Dater
OL
WP('L
SWSL
Background
Monitoring Well
MW-5
MW-11DR
MW-13SR
MW-13DR
Active C&D
MW-14
Monitoring
Wells
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-11 8
MW-19
Active L;&u monitoring
& MNA Performanc
Monitoring
for the Closed
MW-4
vvens
Wells '
MSW Lan
A
MW-11SR
Closed
MW-2
MSW Monitoring
MW-3
Wells & MNA
MW-6
Performance
MW-7
Monitoring
MW-8
Wells
MW-9
MW-15115R
Ethylbenzene
ug/L
03/05/90
NC 2L = 600 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
EPA MCL = 700 ug/L
ug/L
03/10/92
ug/L
04/20/95
ug/L
06/27/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
9.4
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/30/07
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/23/08
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/09
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/10
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
0.13
1
Dry
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
0.13
1
ND
0.62
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.66 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/16
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
0.13
1
ND
0.48
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
0.13
1
ND
0.48
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
0.13
1
ND
ND
0.41
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/27/18
0.13
1
--
ND
ND
0.46
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
0.13
1
ND
ND
0.58
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.67
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/21
0.13
1
ND
ND
KID
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/24/22
0.13
1
ND
ND
KID
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
T1G---%-j-020W358-20-043D —C—ty Le 11%—k B - C— Rp-2--bI-- Page 23 of 51

TABLE
Record of Groundwater Monitoring
Results
(Detected
Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid
Waste Permit
No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North
Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Background
Monitoring Well
Active C&D Monitoring
Wells
Active L;&u monitoring
& MNA Performance
Monitoring
vveiis
Wells
Closed
MSW Monitoring
Wells &
MNA Performance
Monitoring
Wells
Detected Monitoring
Constituent/Parameter
Chloromethane
Units
ug/L
Sample
Date
03/05/90
MDL
POL
SWSL
MW-5
MW-IIDR
MW-13SR
MW-13DR
MW-14
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-18
MW-19
for the Closed
MW-4
MSW Landfill
MW-11 1 SIR
MW-11
MW-2
MW-3
MW-6
MW-7
MW-8
MW-9
MW-15115R
NC 2L = 3 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
ug/L
03/10/92
ug/L
04/20/95
ug/L
06/27/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
26
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
40
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
32
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/30/07
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/23/08
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/09
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/10
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.67 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
0.13
1
Dry
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/16
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/27/18
0.13
1
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/21
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/24/22
0.13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Page 24 of 51

TABLE
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid
Aberdeen, Moore County, North
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
111111111M
Detected Monitoring
I( onstituent/Parameter
Waste Permit
Carolina
Units
No. 63-01
"Dater
WP('L
OL
SWSL
Background
Monitoring Well
MW-5
MW-11DR
MW-13SR
MW-13DR
Active C&D Monitoring
MW-14
Wells
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-11 8
MW-19
Active L;&u monitoring
& MNA Performanc
Monitoring
for the Closed
MW-4
vvens
Wells '
A
MSW Lan
MW-11SR
Closed
MW-2
MSW Monitoring
MW-3
Wells &
MW-6
MNA Performance
MW-7
Monitoring
MW-8
Wells
MW-9
MW-15115R
Methylene chloride
ug/L
03/05/90
NC 2L = 5 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
EPA MCL = 5 ug/L
ug/L
03/10/92
ug/L
04/20/95
ug/L
06/27/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
40
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ND
15
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/30/07
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/23/08
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/09
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/10
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
0.23
1
Dry
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
0.23
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
0.23
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/16
0.23
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
0.23
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
0.23
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
0.23
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
0.23
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/27/18
0.23
1
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
0.23
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
0.23
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.64 J
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
0.23
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
0.23
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/21
0.23
1
ND
ND
KID
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
KID
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
0.23
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.23
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
KID
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/24/22
0.23
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
KID
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
TAG--0\-f-0204358-20-043D —C—ty L-11%—k B - C— Rep-2--bI-- Page 25 of 51

TABLE 4
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01 I
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
[Constituent/Parameter
Units
MDate
rDL
--
--
_W
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
Active L;&u monitoring
Monitoring
for the Closed
ND
vvens
Wells .
MSW Lang
1111W
--
M
ND
Closed
MW-2
ND
MSW Monitoring
ND
Wells
ND
& MNA
Performance
MW-7
ND
Monitoring
MW-8
ND
Wells
MW-9
ND
ND
ND
2-Butanone
ug/L
10/30/07
--
100
NC 2L = 4000 ug/L
ug/L
04/23/08
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.8
J
2.8
J ND
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
17
J
14
J
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/09
--
--
100
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.8
J ND
ug/L
10/19/10
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.8
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.6
J
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.4
J
1.3
J
ND
13
J Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
1.3
100
Dry
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
1.3
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
1.3
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/16
1.3
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
28
J
7.0
J
ND
4.2
J ND
ug/L
11/30/16
1.3
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.4
J
ND
ND
ND
6.4 J
ug/L
04/11/17
1.3
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
24 J
ug/L
12/12/17
1.3
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
1.3
--
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/27/18
1.3
5
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
1.3
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
21
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
1.3
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.7
ug/L
04/07/20
1.3
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
1.3
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/21
1.3
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
1.3
5
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
9.3
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
1.3
5
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/24/22
1.3
5
4000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.1 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Naphthalene
ug/L
03/05/90
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
NC 2L = 6 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
ug/L
03/10/92
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
04/20/95
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
06/27/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.5
ND
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
10/09/06
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
04/24/07
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
06/20/18
0.11
--
10
ND
ND
--
--
0.65
J
--
--
--
--
ND
0.58 J
--
--
--
ND
ND
--
--
--
ug/L
11/27/18
0.11
1
--
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
0.11
1
ND
0.40
J
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
0.11
1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
0.11
1
ND
0.42
J
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
0.11
1
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.49
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
ND
ND
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
04/13/21
0.11
1
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
ND
NS
NS
NS
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/19/21
0.11
1
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
04/12/22
0.11
1
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
ND
NS
NS
NS
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/24/22
0.11
1
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
TAGreensboro1-%-j-020W358-20-043D-C-y Le 11%Task B-C-Rep-22-caxbbles.- Page 26 of 51

TABLE
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
[Constituent/Parameter
Units
MDate
rDL
_W
MW-13DR
Active C&D Monitoring
MW-14
Wells
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-11 8
MW-19
Active L;&u monitoring
& MNA Performanc;
Monitoring
for the Closed MSW
MW-4
vvens
Wells .
Lang
11111W
MW-11 1 SIR
M
Closed
MW-2
MSW Monitoring
MW-3
Wells &
MW-6
MNA Performance
MW-7
Monitoring
MW-8
Wells
MW-9
MW-15115R
Tetrachloroethene
ug/L
03/05/90
NC 2L = 0.7 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
EPA MCL = 5 ug/L
ug/L
03110/92
ug/L
04/20/95
ug/L
06127/95
8.4
3.2
ND
ND
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03128/96
ND
ND
ND
12
ND
ND
ND
--
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6
ug/L
04108/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
8
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
9.2
ND
ND
ND
9.1
ug/L
04130/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
8.2
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
ug/L
04127/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.6
ug/L
03114/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10117100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
8.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10111/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10108/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10113103
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10104105
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10109/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10130/07
1
ND
0.52 J
0.35 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.38 J
ug/L
04/23/08
1
ND
0.40 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10106108
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.49 J
ug/L
04/13/09
1
ND
0.44 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.49 J
ug/L
10115/09
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.50 J
ug/L
04/26/10
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.47 J
ug/L
10/19110
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.52 J
ug/L
04/18/11
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
09130113
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
0.17
1
Dry
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
0.17
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10107115
0.17
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/16
0.17
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
0.17
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
0.17
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
0.17
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
0.17
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11127118
0.17
1
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
0.17
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11119/19
0.17
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
0.17
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10113120
0.17
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/21
0.17
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10119/21
0.17
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.17
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10124/22
0.17
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
TAG--0\-f-0204358-20-043D -C-ty Le 11%-k B - C- Rp-2--bI-- Page 27 of 51

TABLE 4
Record of Groundwater Monitoring
Results
(Detected
Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid
Waste Permit
No. 63-01
a -
Aberdeen, Moore County, North
Carolina
I I
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
-
Background
Monitoring Well
Active C&D
Monitoring Wells
Active L;&u monitoring
& MNA Performance
Monitoring
vvens
Wells
Closed
MSW Monitoring
Wells
& MNA Performance
Monitoring
Wells
Toluene
ug/L
D, -
03/05/90
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
NC 2L = 600 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
EPA MCL = 1000 ug/L
ug/L
03/10/92
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
04/20/95
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
06/27/95
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
ug/L
09/22/95
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
ug/L
03/28/96
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
ug/L
10/29/96
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
15
ug/L
10/14/98
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
2
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/19/00
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/06
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/30/07
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
0.31
J --
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/23/08
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
0.53
J --
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/09
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
0.47
J --
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/10
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
0.47
J --
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
0.43
J --
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.44 J
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
0.14
--
1
Dry
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.59
J
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
0.14
--
1
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
0.14
--
1
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.56
J
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/16
0.14
--
1
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
0.14
--
1
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
0.48
J ND
0.60
J
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
0.14
--
1
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.0
B
ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
0.14
--
1
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.64
J
ND
0.44 J
ug/L
06/20/18
0.14
--
1
ND
ND
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/27/18
0.14
1
--
ND
ND
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.48
J
ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
0.14
1
--
ND
ND
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
0.14
1
--
ND
ND
--
--
ND
ND
ND
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.48
J
ND
0.43 J
ug/L
04/07/20
0.14
1
--
ND
ND
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
0.40
J
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
0.14
1
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.48
J ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.40
J ND
0.51
J
0.43
J ND
ug/L
04/13/21
0.14
1
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.48
J ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
0.14
1
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.61
J 1.3
0.67
J
0.52
J ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.14
1
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
0.54
J
ND
ND
ug/L
10/24/22
0.14
1
600
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.67
J
ND
ND
Page 28 of 51

TABLE
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
C onstituent/Parameter
Units
MDate
rDL
MW-13DR
Active C&D
MW-14
Monitoring
Wells
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-1 8
MW-19
Active L;&u monitoring
& MNA Performanc;
Monitoring
for the Closed MSW
MW-4
vvens
Wells
Lang
MW-11 1 SIR
Closed
MW-2
MSW Monitoring
MW-3
Wells &
MW-6
MNA Performance
MW-7
Monitoring Wells
MW-8
MW-9
MW-15115R
I richloroethene
ug/L
03/05/90
NC 2L = 3 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
EPA MCL = 5 ug/L
ug/L
03110/92
ug/L
04/20/95
ug/L
06127195
3.6
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03128196
ND
ND
ND
6.4
ND
ND
ND
--
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
ug/L
04108/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.9
ug/L
04130/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.4
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
5.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10111101
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10108102
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10113/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10125/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10104/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10109/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10130107
1
ND
1.5
J
0.40 J
ND
0.30 J
ND
ND
ND
0.31 J
ND
0.46 J
ug/L
04/23/08
1
ND
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10106108
1
ND
0.76
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.46 J
ug/L
04/13/09
1
ND
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.74 J
ug/L
10115/09
1
ND
0.97
J
0.51 J
0.64
J ND
ND
ND
ND
0.44 J
ND
0.50 J
ug/L
04/26/10
1
ND
0.85
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.50 J
ug/L
10119/10
1
ND
0.59
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.42 J
ug/L
04/18/11
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10110/11
1
ND
0.77
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
1
ND
0.50
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/09112
1
ND
0.54
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
09/30113
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
1
ND
0.41
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/15114
0.15
1
Dry
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
0.15
1
ND
0.50
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
0.15
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.53 J
ug/L
04/11/16
0.15
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
0.15
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
0.15
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.95 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
0.15
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
0.15
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/27118
0.15
1
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
0.15
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11119119
0.15
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
0.15
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10113120
0.15
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/21
0.15
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10119/21
0.15
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.15
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10124/22
0.15
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
T1G---%-j-020W358-20-043D -C-ty Le 11%-k B - C- Rp-2--bI-- Page 29 of 51

TABLE 4
Record of Groundwater Monitoring
Results
(Detected
Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid
Waste Permit
No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North
Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Background
Monitoring Well
Active C&D Monitoring
Wells
Active L;&u
& MNA
Monitoring
monitoring vvens
Performance
Wells
Closed
MSW Monitoring
Wells
& MNA
Performance
Monitoring
Wells
-
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
D, -
03/05/90
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
NC 2L = 0.03 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
EPA MCL = 2 ug/L
ug/L
03/10/92
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
04/20/95
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ug/L
06/27/95
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
5.3
9.4
40.3
15.9
--
ug/L
09/22/95
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
45
20
--
ug/L
03/28/96
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
13
--
ND
ND
12
ND
--
ug/L
10/29/96
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
35
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
58
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
18
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
28
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
21
ND
ND
ND
17
ug/L
03/14/00
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
16
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
8
ND
15
5
4
ND
9
ug/L
04/19/00
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
25
21
ND
ND
11
ug/L
10/17/00
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
40
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
14
ND
28
13
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
35
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
25
16
ND
11
16
ug/L
10/11/01
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
12
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
15
12
28
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
13
10.8
17.7
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
18.5
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
12.5
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
11.4
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
15.9
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
19.4
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
13.3
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
11.7
ND
12.8
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
12.8
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
14.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/06
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
12.4
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
7.6
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
--
ND
ug/L
10/30/07
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
2.8
--
--
--
--
0.30
J --
ND
2.7
ND
3.6
ND
4.2
1.2
ND
ug/L
04/23/08
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
5.1
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
1.4
ND
ND
3.0
ND
1.8
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
5.8
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
1.2
ND
3.4
J
2.1
ND
1.9
3.9
ug/L
04/13/09
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
5.4
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
1.6
ND
1.3
ND
0.67
J
1.7
3.0
ug/L
10/15/09
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
3.5
--
--
--
--
0.62
J --
0.92
J 2.1
ND
4.0
ND
5.3
1.1
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
5.4
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
1.9
ND
2.0
2.4
0.81
J
1.6
2.4
ug/L
10/19/10
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
ND
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
1.3
ND
ND
ND
0.53
J
ND
2.1
ug/L
04/18/11
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
2.8
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
0.91
J
ND
0.78
J
0.90
J
1.0
0.71
J
2.2
ug/L
10/10/11
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
3.1
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
0.86
J
ND
2.8
--
3.7
1.2
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
3.7
--
--
--
--
ND
--
0.39
J 0.79
J
ND
2.0
1.5
ND
1.1
Dry
ug/L
10/09/12
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
2.6
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
1.3
ND
2.0
2.0
ND
1.4
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
3.5
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
0.61
J
ND
2.6
1.5
ND
1.1
Dry
ug/L
09/30/13
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
2.3
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
3.1
1.4
ND
0.85
J
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
--
--
1
ND
--
--
--
3.1
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
1.7
1.8
ND
1.3
Dry
ug/L
10/15/14
0.32
--
1
Dry
--
--
--
2.3
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
0.62
J
ND
2.2
1.5
0.57
J
0.55
J
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
0.32
--
1
ND
--
--
--
1.8
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
0.72
J
ND
0.78
J
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
0.32
--
1
ND
--
--
--
3.4
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
0.61
J
ND
2.7
1.5
ND
0.51
J
1.2
ug/L
04/11/16
0.32
--
1
ND
--
--
--
3.3
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
0.72
J
0.71
J
0.48
J
0.42
J
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
0.32
--
1
ND
--
--
--
2.5
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
1.3
1.1
0.64
J
ND
0.48 J
ug/L
04/11/17
0.32
--
1
ND
--
--
--
1.9
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
1.4
0.45
J
0.65
J
ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
0.32
--
1
ND
--
--
--
2.0
--
--
--
--
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
1.5
1.1
0.99
J
ND
0.47 J
ug/L
06/20/18
0.32
--
1
ND
2.2
--
--
2.7
--
--
--
--
ND
1.9
ND
ND
ND
2.1
2.1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/27/18
0.32
1
--
ND
1.8
--
--
2.3
--
--
--
--
ND
2.3
ND
ND
ND
1.9
1.1
ND
ND
0.50 J
ug/L
04/02/19
0.32
1
--
ND
2.1
--
--
1.4
--
--
--
--
ND
2.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.4
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
0.32
1
--
ND
1.3
--
--
2.5
ND
ND
--
--
ND
2.0
ND
ND
ND
1.3
1.3
ND
ND
0.74 J
ug/L
04/07/20
0.32
1
--
ND
1.3
--
--
1.3
ND
ND
1.8
--
ND
2.0
NS
NS
NS
ND
0.89
J
ND
ND
ND
(Verification Event)
ug/L
06/05/20
0.32
1
--
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
1.1
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/13/20
0.32
1
--
ND
1.8
ND
ND
2.3
0.79
J ND
1.9
ND
ND
2.4
ND
ND
ND
1.1
5.4
ND
ND
1.1
ug/L
04/13/21
0.32
1
--
ND
2.2
0.86
J ND
0.85 J
ND
ND
1.6
0.6 J
0.5
J 1.8
NS
NS
NS
1.2
2.2
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
0.32
1
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.6
1.8
ND
1.0
J ND
ND
J ND
ND
NS
ND
1.2
1.6
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.32
1
--
ND
1.4
ND
ND
3.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.2
NS
NS
NS
ND
1.4
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/24/22
0.32
1
0.03
ND
1.6
ND
ND
2.1
ND
ND
0.5
J ND
ND
2.6
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Page 30 of 51

TABLE
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
C onstituent/Parameter
Units
MDate
rDL
MW-13DR
Active C&D
MW-14
Monitoring
Wells
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-11 8
MW-19
Active L;&u monitoring
& MNA Performanc;
Monitoring
for the Closed
MW-4
vvens
Wells
MSW Lang
MW-11 1 SIR
Closed
MW-2
MSW Monitoring
MW-3
Wells & MNA
MW-6
Performance
MW-7
Monitoring
MW-8
Wells
MW-9
MW-15115R
Xylenes (Total)
ug/L
03/05/90
NC 2L = 500 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
EPA MCL = 10000 ug/L
ug/L
03110/92
ug/L
04/20/95
ug/L
06127195
ND
ND
4.7
4.3
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03128196
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04108/97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
10.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04130/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
18
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10111101
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10108102
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10113/03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10125/04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10104/05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10109/06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10130107
5
ND
0.52
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.34 J
ND
4.4
J
0.44
J
ND
ug/L
04/23/08
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10106108
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.4
ug/L
04/13/09
5
ND
0.47
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.41
J
0.98 J
ug/L
10115/09
5
ND
0.51
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.46
J
0.45
J
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
5
ND
0.52
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.3 J
ug/L
10119/10
5
ND
0.48
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.47
J
0.41
J
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10110/11
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/17/12
5
ND
0.56
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/09112
5
ND
0.45
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/13
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
09/30113
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/16/14
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/15114
0.45
5
Dry
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.60
J
ND
Dry
ug/L
04/15/15
0.45
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dry
ug/L
10/07/15
0.45
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.93
J
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/16
0.45
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
0.45
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.61
J
ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
0.45
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.3
B
ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
0.45
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.2
J
ND
ND
ug/L
06120118
0.45
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.99
J
ND
ND
ug/L
11127118
0.45
3
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04102119
0.45
3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.45
J
ND
ug/L
11119119
0.45
3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.2
J
ND
ND
ug/L
04107120
0.45
3
ND
ND
0.48
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
0.7
J
ND
ND
ug/L
10113120
0.45
3
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.49
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.2
0.46
J
ND
ug/L
04/13/21
0.45
3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
0.45
3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.45
3
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10124/22
0.45
3
500
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.1
J
ND
ND
TAG--0\-f-0204358-20-043D -C-ty Le 11%-k B - C- Rp-2--bI-- Page 31 of 51

TABLE 4
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results (Detected Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, INC Solid
Waste Permit
No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North
Carolina
I
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Detected Monitoring
r
Background
monitoring WJ
Active C&D Monitoring
Wells
& MNA
Monitoring
Performanc
Wells
Closed
MSW Monitoring
Wells
& MINA
Performance
Monitoring
Wells
Constituent/Parameter
1,4-Dioxane
Units
ug/L
nDate
11/27/18
1.2
PCIL
2.0
SWSL
--
MW-5
ND
1110��
5.6
--
MW-13DR
--
MW-14
15
MW-17S
--
--
MW.q
--
MW_19
--
for ffi. Closed
MW-4
2.8
MSW Lal.
MW-11SR
7.3
ND
MW-2
7.8
MW-3
ND
MW-6
2.9
MW-7
4.6
MW_8
6.3
MW_9
39
MW-15115R
ND
NC 2L= 3.0 ug/L
ug/L
04/02/19
1.2
2.0
ND
4.8
11
2.0
8.4
ND
7.5
ND
1.6
J
4.0
7.2
23
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
0.8
2.0
ND
3.9
15
1.6
J 5.2
2.0
4.8
2.3
14
1.1
J 1.4
J
10
39
22
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
0.8
2.0
--
ND
5.9
--
--
15
3.0
8.5
11
--
2.2
4.3
NS
NS
NS
2.5
1.1 J
16
29
NO
ug/L
10/13/20
0.8
2.0
--
ND
4.4
3.4
2.5
14
2.3
6.8
10
2.8
1.3
5.4
ND
9.7
1.0
J 2.0
6.9
29
25
NO
ug/L
04/13/21
0.8
2.0
--
ND
5.3
3.8
3.4
5.2
0.9
J 10.0
15
7.9
5.3
7.0
NS
NS
NS
1.7
3.9
22
30
2.2
ug/L
10/19/21
0.8
2.0
--
ND
3.9
9.2
3.3
17
3.4
7.1
13
2.9
1.6
J 5.1
ND
25
1.6
J 1.8
J
6.3
48
34
NO
ug/L
04/12/22
0.8
2.0
--
ND
4.3
8.8
4.2
19
ND
12.0
9
8.1
ND
3.6
NS
NS
NS
1.3
J
4.0
22
44
NO
ug/L
10/24/22
0.3
1.0
3
ND
2.6
7.2
2.6
11
1.3
5.6
6
1.9
1.2
1.7
1.2
J 14
1.2
1.3
J
9.3
74
21
NO
Tetrahydrofuran
ug/L
06/20/18
0.53
1.0
ND
2.6
1.8
ND
5.5
NC 2L= No Standard
ug/L
11/27/18
0.53
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
0.53
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
15
ug/L
11/19/19
0.53
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/20
0.53
1.0
ND
2.4
ND
ND
3.3
ND
ND
6
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
04/13/21
0.53
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
8.6
7.5
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/19/21
0.53
1.0
--
ND
3.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.3
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
04/12/22
0.53
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.8
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ug/L
10/24/22
0.53
1.0
2000
ND
3.6
ND
ND
6.8
4.2
ND
4
ND
ND
4.9
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
Notes:
1.) ug/L = Micrograms per liter
2.) ND = Not detected at the stated reporting limit
3.) NM = Not measured
4.) J = Estimated concentration reported below Solid Waste Section Limit
5.) -- = No data available
6.) Blanks = Field, trip, and method blanks
7.) Reanalysis = Reanalysis result in parenthesis next to the original result (e.g., reanalysis was performed for arsenic in January 2017)
8.) Dissolved = Dissolved sample in brackets [e.g. a dissolved sample was analyzed for MW-9 for the Febuary 2017 verification event]
9.) Bold = Concentration above the current NC 2L Groundwater Standard or NC 2L IMAC Groundwater Standard
10.) Shaded and Bold = Concentration above the current NC 2L Groundwater Standard or NC 2L IMAC Groundwater Standard and EPA MCL
11.) EPA MCL = US Environmental Protection Agency Maximum Contaminant Level
12.) SWS GSP = Solid Waste Section Groundwater Protection Standard
13.) SWS Reporting Limit = NCPQL or lab -specific reporting limit prior to October 2007 and NCSWSL starting in October 2007 and ending June 1, 2018
14.) = EPA MCL is an action level
15.)"= EPA MCL is a secondary standard
16.) Historical data prior to 10/30/07 provided by HDR Engineering of the Carolinas, Inc. Data 10/30/07 to 6/30/2020 Provided by Golder
17.) Samples collected using low -flow purge and sample techniques.
18.) PQL = Practical quantitation limit - lab specific limit
19.) MDL = Method Detection Limit
20.) SWSL = Solid Waste Section Reporting Limits (historic)
21.) The Blake Well not sampled in June 2018 and April 2020 as the power was out at the residence and no sample could be obtained.
TAGreensboro15G%\fecQ020W3e8-20-043D-C-ty Landfill\Task B - CH Rep­22-caxbb1es.x Page 32 of 51

TABLE 5
Record of Surface Water
Monitoring
Results (Detected
Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC
Solid Waste
Permit No.
63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County,
North Carolina
S&ME Project Number 4358-20-043D
M
FD.t.tctu.ed
Detection
Cons it ntlParameter
Units
Date
Limit
Limit
SW-2
SW-1 SW-3 SW-4
Arsenic
ug/L
03/05/90
ND
ND
SW Standard = 10 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
ND
ND
ug/L
03/10/92
ND
ND
ug/L
04/20/95
ND
ND
ug/L
06/27/95
ND
ND
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ND
ND
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
--
ND
ND
ug/L
11/01/07
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/23/08
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/09
10
2.85 J
4.46 J
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/10
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
10
3.00 B
6.69 B
3.37 J
ug/L
10/10/11
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/17/12
10
ND
ND
5.70 J
ug/L
10/09/12
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/15/13
10
3.57 B
ND ND ND
3.34 J
ug/L
09/30/13
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/16/14
--
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/14
5.4
10
7.20 J
ND 9.37 J ND
ND
ug/L
04/15/15
5.4
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/07/15
5.4
10
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/16
5.4
10
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
6.8
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
6.8
10
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
6.8
10
ND
7.17 J Dry ND
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
7.6
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
11/28/18
7.6
--
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
7.6
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
7.6
9.27 J
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
7.6
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/20
7.6
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
7.6
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/22
7.6
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/26/22
6.4
ND
ND ND ND
ND
TAGreenabao-1580�r,j 1sU02014358-20-MD Moore County LanM18T8sk B- CAER R,wdQ022_casr tables.Au

TABLE 5
Record of Surface Water
Monitoring
Results (Detected
Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC
Solid Waste
Permit No.
63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County,
North Carolina
S&ME Project Number 4358-20-043D
F.t.tctu.edntlParameter
Detection
Units
Date
Limit
L
SW-1
SW-3
SW-4
Barium
ug/L
03/05/90
--
--
ND
ND
--
--
--
SW Standard = 1000 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
ND
21
ug/L
03/10/92
ND
ND
ug/L
04/20/95
ND
ND
ug/L
06/27/95
ND
ND
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ND
ND
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
--
ND
ND
--
ug/L
11/01/07
100
10.3 J
29.1
J
1.10
J
ug/L
04/23/08
100
13.9 J
27.9
J
0.20
J
ug/L
10/06/08
100
12.5 J
29.5
J
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
100
14.2 J
28.0
J
ND
ug/L
10/13/09
100
11.6 J
29.6
J
1.02
J
ug/L
04/26/10
100
13.8 J
28.4
J
ND
ug/L
10/19/10
100
13.3 J
19.3
J
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
100
27.1 J
24.4
J
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
100
11.7 J
23.6
J
ND
ug/L
04/17/12
100
17.8 J
24.0
J
ND
ug/L
10/09/12
100
12.7 J
26.2
J
32.4
J
26.0 J
1.07
J
ug/L
04/15/13
100
12.5 J
28.0
J
32.1
J
24.2 J
ND
ug/L
09/30/13
100
10.9 J
26.5
J
22.0
J
41.0 J
ND
ug/L
04/16/14
--
100
18.3 J
22.5
J
196
25.7 J
ND
ug/L
10/15/14
1
100
15.1 J
19.5
J
630
30.5 J
ND
ug/L
04/15/15
1
100
18.9 J
21.2
J
80.2
J
33.2 J
ND
ug/L
10/07/15
1
100
12.6 J
20.1
J
Dry
29.8 J
ND
ug/L
04/12/16
1
100
14.7 J
18.6
J
Dry
36.2 J
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
1
100
12.6 B
16.0
B
20.1
B
25.4 B
7.92
ug/L
04/11/17
1
100
13.0 J
23.0
J
Dry
22.2 J
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
1
100
9.82 J
17.0
J
Dry
19.9 J
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
1
100
19.5 J
20.6
J
27.4
J
29.2 J
ND
ug/L
11/28/18
1
--
12.9
16.1
19.2
20.9
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
1.1
13.6
15.1
18.7
19.8
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
1.1
13.9
19.3
22.1
20.0
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
1.1
13.5
17.0
22.2
21.7
ND
ug/L
10/15/20
1.1
11.1
22.6
23.0
27.6
ND
ug/L
04/12/21
1.1
14.0
21.4
20.8
20.7
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
1.1
10.7
22.4
22.8
26.6
ND
ug/L
04/11/22
1.1
12.9
21.7
21.6
27.0
ND
ug/L
10/26/22
4.4
11.0
24.0
24.0
22.0
ND
TAGreenabao-1580�,jeolaU02014358-20-MD Moore County LanM18T8sk B- CAER R,wdQ022_casr tabl-Au

TABLE 5
Record of Surface Water
Monitoring
Results (Detected
Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, INC
Solid Waste
Permit No.
63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County,
North Carolina
S&ME Project Number 4358-20-043D
M
FD.t.tctu.ed
Detection
Cons it ntlParameter
Units
Date
Limit
L
SW-1 SW-3 SW-4
Cadmium
ug/L
03/05/90
--
--
ND
ND -- --
--
SW Standard
ug/L
03/21/91
ND
ND
Acute = 0.82 ug/L
ug/L
03/10/92
ND
ND
Chronic = 0.15 ug/L
ug/L
04/20/95
ND
ND
ug/L
06/27/95
ND
ND
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
7
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ND
ND
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
1
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
5
4
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
4
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
4
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
1
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/06
1
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
--
ND
ND
ug/L
11/01/07
1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/23/08
1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/09
1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/10
1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/17/12
1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/12
1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/15/13
1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
09/30/13
1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/16/14
--
1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/14
0.36
1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/15/15
0.36
1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/07/15
0.36
1
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/16
0.36
1
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
0.36
1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
0.36
1
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
0.36
1
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
0.36
1
ND
ND ND 0.36 B
0.38 J
ug/L
11/28/18
0.36
--
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
0.36
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
0.36
ND
0.45 J ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
0.36
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/20
0.36
ND
ND 0.378 J ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/21
0.36
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
0.36
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/22
0.36
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/26/22
0.44
ND
ND ND ND
ND
TAGreenabao-1580�r,j 1sU02014358-20-MD Moore County LanM18T8sk B- CAER R,wdQ022_caer tabl-Au

TABLE 5
Record of Surface Water
Monitoring
Results (Detected
Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, INC
Solid Waste
Permit No.
63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County,
North Carolina
S&ME Project Number 4358-20-043D
M
FD.t.tctu.ed
Detection
Cons it ntlParameter
Units
Date
Limit
L
SW-1 SW-3 SW-4
Chromium
ug/L
03/05/90
--
--
ND
ND -- --
--
SW Standard
ug/L
03/21/91
ND
ND
Acute = 183 ug/L
ug/L
03/10/92
ND
ND
Chronic = 23.8 ug/L
ug/L
04/20/95
ND
ND
ug/L
06/27/95
ND
ND
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ND
ND
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
--
ND
ND
ug/L
11/01/07
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/23/08
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/09
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/10
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
10
1.19 J
ND
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/17/12
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/12
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/15/13
10
1.47 B
ND ND ND
1.70 J
ug/L
09/30/13
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/16/14
--
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/14
1.4
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/15/15
1.4
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/07/15
1.4
10
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/16
1.4
10
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
1.4
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
1.4
10
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
1.4
10
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
1.4
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
11/28/18
1.4
--
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
1.4
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
1.4
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
1.4
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/20
1.4
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
1.4
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
1.4
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/22
1.4
ND
ND 1.45 J ND
ND
ug/L
10/26/22
1.1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
TAGreenabao-1580�r,j 1sU02014358-20-MD Moore County LanM18T8sk B- CAER R,wdQ022_caer tabl-Au

TABLE 5
Record of Surface Water
Monitoring
Results (Detected
Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, INC
Solid Waste
Permit No.
63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County,
North Carolina
S&ME Project Number 4358-20-043D
FD.t.tctu.ed
Cons it M ntlParameter
Units
Date
Detection
Limit
L
SW-1 SW-3 SW-4
Copper
ug/L
03/05/90
--
--
ND
ND -- --
--
SW Standard
ug/L
03/21/91
ND
ND
Acute = 3.64 ug/L
ug/L
03/10/92
ND
ND
Chronic = 2.74 ug/L
ug/L
04/20/95
ND
ND
ug/L
06/27/95
ND
ND
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ND
ND
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ug/L
10/09/06
ug/L
04/24/07
--
ug/L
11/19/19
1.60
-
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
1.60
1.78 J
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/20
1.60
ND
1.78 J 2.13 J ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
ANR
ANR ANR ANR
ug/L
10/19/21
ANR
ANR ANR ANR
ug/L
04/11/22
ANR
ANR ANR ANR
ug/L
10/26/22
ANR
ANR ANR ANR
TAGreenabao-1580�r,j 1sU02014358-20-MD Moore County LanM18T8sk B- CAER R,wdQ022_caer tabl-Au

TABLE 5
Record of Surface Water
Monitoring
Results (Detected
Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, INC
Solid Waste
Permit No.
63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County,
North Carolina
S&ME Project Number 4358-20-043D
M
FD.t.tctu.ed
Detection
Cons it ntlParameter
Units
Date
Limit
L
SW-1 SW-3 SW-4
Lead
ug/L
03/05/90
--
--
ND
ND -- --
--
SW Standard
ug/L
03/21/91
ND
ND
Acute = 14 ug/L
ug/L
03/10/92
ND
ND
Chronic = 0.54 ug/L
ug/L
04/20/95
ND
ND
ug/L
06/27/95
ND
ND
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ND
ND
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
--
ND
ND
ug/L
11/01/07
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/23/08
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/09
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/10
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
10
6.77 J
ND
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
10
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/17/12
10
2.00 J
ND --
ND
ug/L
10/09/12
10
ND
ND 2.38 J ND
ND
ug/L
04/15/13
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
09/30/13
10
ND
ND ND 2.88 J
ND
ug/L
04/16/14
--
10
ND
ND 18.3 ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/14
2.1
10
ND
ND 15.3 ND
ND
ug/L
04/15/15
2.1
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/07/15
2.1
10
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/16
2.1
10
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
3.1
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
3.1
10
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
3.1
10
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
3.1
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
11/28/18
3.1
--
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
3.1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
3.1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
3.1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/20
3.1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
3.1
ND
ND 4.55 J ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
3.1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/22
3.1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/26/22
6.6
ND
ND ND ND
ND
TAGreenabao-1580�r,j 1sU02014358-20-MD Moore County LanM18T8sk B- CAER R,wdQ022_caer tabl-Au

TABLE 5
Record of Surface Water
Monitoring
Results (Detected
Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC
Solid Waste
Permit No.
63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County,
North Carolina
S&ME Project Number 4358-20-043D
M
ED.t.tctu.ed
Detection
Cons it ntlParameter
Units
Date
Limit
L
SW-11 SW-3 SW-4
Mercury
ug/L
03/05/90
--
--
ND
ND -- --
--
SW Standard = 0.012 ug/L
ug/L
03/21/91
ND
ND
ug/L
03/10/92
ND
ND
ug/L
04/20/95
ND
ND
ug/L
06/27/95
ND
ND
ug/L
09/22/95
ND
ND
ug/L
03/28/96
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/96
ND
ND
ug/L
04/08/97
ND
ND
ug/L
10/29/97
ND
ND
ug/L
04/30/98
ND
ND
ug/L
10/14/98
ND
ND
ug/L
04/27/99
ND
ND
ug/L
10/21/99
ND
ND
ug/L
03/14/00
ND
ND
ug/L
04/19/00
ND
ND
ug/L
10/17/00
ND
ND
ug/L
04/10/01
ND
ND
ug/L
10/11/01
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/02
ND
ND
ug/L
10/08/02
ND
ND
ug/L
04/09/03
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/03
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/04
ND
ND
ug/L
10/25/04
ND
ND
ug/L
04/04/05
ND
ND
ug/L
10/04/05
ND
ND
ug/L
04/28/06
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
--
ND
ND
ug/L
11/01/07
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/23/08
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/09
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/10
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/17/12
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/12
0.2
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/15/13
0.2
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
09/30/13
0.2
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/16/14
--
0.2
ND
ND 0.190 J ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/14
0.17
0.2
ND
ND 0.411 (ND) ND
ND
ug/L
04/15/15
0.17
0.2
ND
ND 0.0593 J ND
ND
ug/L
10/07/15
0.17
0.2
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/16
0.17
0.2
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
0.17
0.2
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
0.17
0.2
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
0.099
0.2
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
0.15
0.2
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
11/28/18
0.15
--
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
0.15
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
0.15
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/20
0.15
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.15
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
0.15
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/22
0.15
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/26/22
0.08
ND
ND ND ND
ND
TAGreenabao-1580�r,j 1sU02014358-20-MD Moore County LanM18T8sk B- CAER R,wdQ022_casr tabl-Au

TABLE 5
Record of Surface Water
Monitoring
Results (Detected
Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC
Solid Waste
Permit No.
63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County,
North Carolina
S&ME Project Number 4358-20-043D
M
FD.t.tctu.ed
Detection
Cons it ntlParameter
Units
Date
Limit
Limit
SW-2
SW-1 SW-3 SW-4
Acetone
ug/L
11/01/07
100
ND
ND
ND
"NC Protective" 3100 ug/L
ug/L
04/23/08
100
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
100
4.0 B
4.8 B
5.0 J
ug/L
04/13/09
100
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/09
100
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
100
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/10
100
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
100
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
100
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/17/12
100
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/12
100
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/15/13
100
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
09/30/13
100
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/16/14
--
100
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/14
1.2
100
ND
ND 13 J ND
ND
ug/L
04/15/15
1.2
100
ND
ND 7.4 J 6.0 J
ND
ug/L
10/07/15
1.2
100
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/16
1.2
100
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
10
100
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
10
100
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
12/12/17
10
100
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
10
100
ND
ND ND ND
15
ug/L
07/30/18
10
100
ND ND
ND
ug/L
11/28/18
10
--
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/20
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/22
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/26/22
10
ND
ND ND ND
ND
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
04/28/06
--
ND
ND
SW Standard = 488 ug/L
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
--
ND
ND
ug/L
11/01/07
3
ND
0.88 J
ND
ug/L
04/23/08
3
ND
0.61 J
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
3
ND
0.60 J
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
3
ND
0.72 J
ND
ug/L
10/13/09
3
ND
0.74 J
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
3
ND
0.71 J
ND
ug/L
10/19/10
3
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
3
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
3
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/17/12
3
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/12
3
ND
0.76 J ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/15/13
3
ND
0.88 J ND ND
ND
ug/L
09/30/13
3
ND
0.70 J ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/16/14
--
3
ND
0.67 J ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/14
0.17
3
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/15/15
0.17
3
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/07/15
0.17
3
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/16
0.17
3
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
0.17
3
ND
ND 0.42 J ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
0.17
3
ND
0.86 J Dry ND
ND
ug/L
12/14/17
0.17
3
ND
0.43 J Dry ND
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
0.17
3
ND
0.42 J 0.58 J ND
ND
ug/L
07/30/18
0.17
3
ND ND
ND
ug/L
11/28/18
0.17
--
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
0.17
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
0.17
ND
0.57 J ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
0.17
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/20
0.17
ND
0.98 J ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.17
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
0.17
ND
ND 0.57 J ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/22
0.17
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/26/22
0.17
ND
1.2 ND ND
ND
TAGreenabao-1580�r,j 1sU0204358-20-MD Moore County LanM18T8sk B- CAER R,wdQ022_caer tabl-Au

TABLE 5
Record of Surface Water
Monitoring
Results (Detected
Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, INC
Solid Waste
Permit No.
63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County,
North Carolina
S&ME Project Number 4358-20-043D
Method
SWS
Downstream
Monitoring
Sample
rD,t,tctu,ed
tection
DeCons
Reporting
Blanks
it ntlParameter
Units
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
11/01/07
--
1
ND
ND -- --
ND
No SW Standard
ug/L
04/23/08
1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/09
1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/10
1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/17/12
1
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/12
1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/15/13
1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
09/30/13
1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/16/14
--
1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/14
0.19
1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/15/15
0.19
1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/07/15
0.19
1
ND
ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/16
0.19
1
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
0.19
1
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
0.19
1
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
12/14/17
0.19
1
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
0.19
1
ND
0.42 J ND ND
ND
ug/L
07/30/18
0.19
ND ND
ND
ug/L
11/28/18
0.19
--
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
0.19
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
0.19
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
0.19
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/20
0.19
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.19
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
0.19
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/22
0.19
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/26/22
0.19
ND
ND ND ND
ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
04/28/06
--
ND
ND
INC Protective = 60 ug/L
ug/L
10/09/06
ND
ND
ug/L
04/24/07
--
ND
ND
ug/L
11/01/07
5
ND
0.33 J
ND
ug/L
04/23/08
5
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/06/08
5
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/13/09
5
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/13/09
5
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/26/10
5
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/10
5
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/18/11
5
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/10/11
5
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
04/17/12
5
ND
ND
ND
ug/L
10/09/12
5
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/15/13
5
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
09/30/13
5
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/16/14
--
5
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/14
0.15
5
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/15/15
0.15
5
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/07/15
0.15
5
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/16
0.15
5
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
11/30/16
0.15
5
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/17
0.15
5
ND
ND Dry ND
0.54 J
ug/L
12/12/17
0.15
5
ND
ND Dry ND
ND
ug/L
06/20/18
0.15
5
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
07/30/18
0.15
5
ND ND
ND
ug/L
11/28/18
0.15
--
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/02/19
0.15
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
11/19/19
0.15
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/07/20
0.15
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/15/20
0.15
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/12/22
0.15
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/19/21
0.15
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
04/11/22
0.15
ND
ND ND ND
ND
ug/L
10/26/22
0.15
ND
ND ND ND
ND
TAGreensbao-1580�r,j 1sU02014358-20-MD Moore County LanM18T8sk B- CAER R,wdQ022_caer tabl-Au

TABLE 5
Record of Surface Water
Monitoring
Results (Detected
Constituents)
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC
Solid Waste
Permit No.
63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County,
North Carolina
S&ME Project Number 4358-20-043D
For-
Downstream
Detected
Date
Method
Limit
SWS
Limit
SW-2
SW-1 SW-3 SW-4
Toluene
ug/L
11/01/07
1
NO
NO
NO
SW Standard = 11 ug/L
ug/L
04/23/08
1
NO
NO
NO
(freshwater standard)
ug/L
10/06/08
1
NO
NO
NO
ug/L
04/13/09
1
NO
NO
NO
ug/L
10/13/09
1
NO
NO
NO
ug/L
04/26/10
1
NO
NO
NO
ug/L
10/19/10
1
NO
NO
NO
ug/L
04/18/11
1
NO
NO
NO
ug/L
10/10/11
1
NO
NO
NO
ug/L
04/17/12
1
NO
NO
NO
ug/L
10/09/12
1
NO
NO 0.95 J NO
NO
ug/L
04/15/13
1
NO
NO NO NO
NO
ug/L
09/30/13
1
NO
NO NO NO
NO
ug/L
04/16/14
1
NO
NO NO NO
NO
ug/L
10/15/14
0.14
1
NO
NO NO NO
NO
ug/L
04/15/15
0.14
1
NO
NO NO NO
NO
ug/L
10/07/15
0.14
1
NO
NO Dry NO
NO
ug/L
04/12/16
0.14
1
NO
NO Dry NO
NO
ug/L
11/30/16
0.14
1
NO
NO NO NO
NO
ug/L
04/11/17
0.14
1
NO
NO Dry NO
0.80 J
ug/L
12/12/17
0.14
1
NO
NO Dry NO
NO
ug/L
06/20/18
0.14
1
NO
NO NO NO
NO
ug/L
07/30/18
0.14
1
NO NO
NO
ug/L
11/28/18
0.14
NO
NO NO 0.57 J
NO
(Verification Sample)
ug/L
02/13/19
0.14
NO
ug/L
04/02/19
0.14
NO
NO NO NO
NO
ug/L
11/19/19
0.14
NO
NO NO NO
NO
ug/L
04/07/20
0.14
NO
NO NO NO
NO
ug/L
10/15/20
0.14
NO
NO NO NO
NO
ug/L
04/12/22
0.14
NO
NO NO NO
NO
ug/L
10/19/21
0.14
NO
NO NO NO
NO
ug/L
04/12/22
0.14
NO
NO NO NO
NO
ug/L
10/26/22
0.14
NO
NO NO NO
NO
1,4-Dioxane
ug/L
11/28/18
1.2
NO
NO 2.7 NO
ND
(Verification Sample)
ug/L
02/13/19
1.2
2.7
'NC Protective' = 0.35 ug/L
ug/L
04/02/19
1.2
NO
NO 2.2 NO
NO
ug/L
11/19/19
1.2
NO
1.3 J 2.5 1.0 J
NO
ug/L
04/07/20
1.2
NO
1.2 J 3.0 0.94 J
NO
ug/L
10/15/20
1.2
NO
2.5 2.7 0.91 J
NO
ug/L
04/12/22
1.2
NO
NO 2.6 1.1
NO
ug/L
10/19/21
1.2
NO
3.2 3.6 J 1.6 J
NO
ug/L
04/11/22
1.2
NO
3.4 3.8 0.81 J
ug/L
10/26/22
0.3
NO
4.1 4.5 0.54 J
NO
Notes:
1.) mg/L = milligrams per liter
2.) ug/L = micrograms per liter
3.) ND = Not detected at the stated reporting limit
4.) J = Estimated value
5.) -- = No available data
6.) SWS Reporting Limit = NC PQL or lab -specific reporting limit prior to October 2007 and NCSWSL starting in October 2007.
7.) Shaded = Constituent exceeds applicable Surface Water Standard
8.) Blanks = Field, trip and method blanks
9.) Surface Water Standards based on WS-II, High Quality Water Classification for Horse Creek and its tributary per 15A NCAC 2B.
10.) SW Standard for lead is a Narrative Standard per 2B .0211
11.) Upstream and downstream designations based on inspection of site conditions and flow regimes. Reports prior to October 2009 had the designations inadvertently switched.
12.) For standards with both acute and chronic listed, acute = highlighted and chronic = bolded
TAGreenabao-1580�r,j 1sU02014358-20-043D Moore County LanMIKTesk B -CAER Re dQ022_caer tables.Am

Table 6
Historic Methane Readings At Gas Compliance Points and Vents GW-33, GV-34, GV-35 & GV36
Moore County Landfill (Permit No. 63-01)
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Methane
I (%)
Scale-
house
M int.
Shop
Transfer
Station
Blake 'Or;71
Crawlspace
9
10
Irrp'
W�=
11
WrFG—P--E
13
WE-G—p-
14
=Mlffp—
15R
W_
7-6
W_19
7-W=Wr'7v-JF7-7GV-35
_33
GV-36
Page 43 of 51

Table 6
Historic Methane Readings At Gas Compliance Points and Trench Vents GW-33 & GV-34
Moore County Landfill (Permit No. 63-01)
Aberdeen, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
= a
III E
IFF M.
--
0.0%
--
0.0%
--
2.0%
0.5%
0.0%
--
0.2 %
--
--
--
--
--
--
04/17/14
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--
0.0%
40.6%
--
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--
0.0%
--
0.0%
-
0.0%
0.0%
4.8 %
--
0.5 %
--
--
--
--
-
--
08/25/14
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--
0.0%
21.2%
-
0.0%
0.0/
0.0%
--
0.0%
--
0.0%
-
0.0%
0.0%
10.7%
--
54.0%
--
--
--
--
-
--
10/16/14
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--
0.0%
38.1%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--
0.0%
--
0.0%
-
0.0%
2.3%
42.3%
-
58.3%
-
--
-
--
-
--
01/16/15
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--
0.0%
21.6%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--
0.2%
--
11.2%
-
0.0%
0.0%
17.4%
-
55.9%
-
--
-
--
-
--
04/21/15
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--
0.0%1
43.6%
-1
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--1
0.0%
--
27.7%
-
0.0%1
0.0%
1.5%
-
0.7%
-
--
-
--
-
--
08/17/15
0.0%1
0.0%
0.0%1
0.0%
0.0%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--
0.2%
--
0.1%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
-
51.8%
-
--
-
--
-
--
01/28/16
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--
0.1%
53.7%
-
0.0%
0.1%
0.1%
--
0.1%
--
0.1%
-
0.1%
0.1%
22.0%
-
49.6%
--
--
-
--
-
--
04/11/16
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
52.0%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--
0.0%
--
0.0%
-
0.0%
0.0%
14.8%
-
10.6%
--
--
-
--
--
--
08/05/16
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
31.0%
-
0.2%
0.2%
0.2%
--
0.2%
--
1.2 %
-
0.2%
2.5 %
1.1 %
-
60.2%
--
--
-
--
--
--
12/02/16
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
8.3%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--
0.0%
--
0.0%
-
0.0%
0.0%
4.0%
-
0.7%
-
--
-
-
--
02/09/17
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--
0.0%
--
0.0%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-
0.0%
-
--
-
--
-
--
04/12/17
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25.3%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--
0.0%
--
0.0%
-
0.0%
0.4%
14.5%
-
29.1%
-
--
-
-
--
08/16/17
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--
0.0%
--
0.0%
-
0.0%
1.6%
0.6%
-
28.9%
-
--
-
--
-
--
12/12/17
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%1
0.0%
0.0%
21.2%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--
0.0%
--
0.0%
-
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
-
9.1%
-
--
-
-
--
01/22/18
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
12.2%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--
0.0%
--
0.0%
-
0.0%
0.0%
44.2%
-
53.5%
-
--
-
-
--
06/20/18
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20.1%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--
0.0%
--
0.0%
-
0.0%
1.0%
0.8%
-
54.6%
--
--
-
--
-
--
08/23/18
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--
0.0%
--
0.0%
-
0.0%
0.6%
3.9%
-
16.2%
--
--
-
--
-
--
11/28/18
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0/
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
7.1%
-
8.1%
--
--
46.5%
1.4%
-
--
02/13/19
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15.3%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%1
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20.7%
-
20.7%
--
--
0.0%
0.0%
-
--
04/03/19
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
19.1%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
13.7%
-
0.6%
--
--
9.1%
7.0%
-
--
09/26/19
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.5%
-
55.5%
--
--
35.1%
9.0%
-
--
11/20/19
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
-
18.6%
--
--
4.9%
0.2%
-
--
02/17/20
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
18.7%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
11.9%
-
28.1%
--
--
35.9%
0.3%
-
--
04/07/20
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
32.2%
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
23.6%
-
59.9%
--
--
42.0%
9.0%
-
--
09/15/20
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
abandoned
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
22.5 %
--
--
25.0%
22.1 %
-
--
12/11/20
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
abandoned
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
9.6%
0.0%
61.3%
-
--
45.0%
52.2%
-
--
02/24/21
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
abandoned
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
0.0%
1.4 %
28.7 %
0.0%
67.8 %
-
--
44.5 %
51.4 %
-
--
04/12/21
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
2.0%
0.0%
21.8%
-
--
39.5%
36.1%
-
--
09/29/21
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
19.5%
0.0%
57.5%
-
--
55.6%
46.8%
-
--
12/17/21
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
13.8%
0.0%
27.8%
10.1%
57.0%
34.3%
46.6%
-
--
03/25/22
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
29.1%
0.0%
54.7%
28.1%
56.4%
53.7%
51.6%
-
--
06/07/22
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
0.0%
0.0 %
4.7 %
0.0%
42.4 %
30.5%
56.5%
49.1 %
50.7 %
06/16/22
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
abandoned
NM
NM
NM
abandoned
NM
abandoned
NM
abandoned
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
58.4%
54.9%
06/17/22
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
abandoned
NM
NM
NM
abandoned
NM
abandoned
NM
abandoned
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
21.1%
21.3%
57.6%
52.4%
58.1%
57.2%
57.3%
09/26/22
0.0 %
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
abandoned
0.0 %
0.0 %
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0 %
0.0%
0.1 %
9.5 %
0.0%
50.8 %
13.7 %
56.1 %
52.5 %
47.9 %
55.6 %
56.2
12/16/22
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
13.8%
0.0%
56.5%
27.4%
51.4%
54.2%
47.6%
56.4%
57.0%
03/28/23
0.0 %
0.0 %
0.0 %
0.0 %
0.0 %
abandoned
0.0 %
0.0 %
0.0 %
abandoned
0.0%
abandoned
0.0 %
abandoned
0.0 %
0.0%
0.4 %
6.9 %
0.0 %
38.7 %
40.1 %
31.8 %
35.7 %
49.8 %
26.4 %
46.7 %
Notes: - Gas probes with GP prefix installed March 2000, except GP-20 & GP-21 install October 2021.
GV 1-12 installedin November 2004. GV 13-24 installedin November 2007. METHANE (%) @ M W -1$ G P-18
GV 25-29 installedin February2009. G V 30-33 installed April 2014
GV 33 & G V-34 installed November 2018 (gas cut-off trench) 100%
GV-35 & G V-36 installed June 2022 90%
NM = not measured 80%
Lower explosive limit of methane gas: 5 % 70%
Upper explosive limit of methane gas: 15 % 60%
50%
Indicates methane gas levels between upper and lower explosive limit.
40%
Indicates methane gas levels above upper explosive limit. 30%
All data recorded prior to 08/082007 supplied by HDR. 20%
All data recorded prior to 9115120 supplied by Golder 10%
-- May indicate a reading of zero OR no record. o%
O O�' O� Oa Oy Oh Off' O O^ O� 00 00 00 OA ti ti ti ��' l�' l3 l' ti �y �y ti 1^ h0 l0 l0 lA ti ti ti ti tiry lry h3
green shading indicates a compliance gas monitoring well replaced with new well
orange shading= vent wells that are not compliance wells o� '�� o� ry� o� ti\ of ,-N "No -No o� tit o� v� o� YN o\ ti\ o0 1\ o� ti\ o0 1\ 10 1\ oe tiN oe -N oe N oo +�� oo .�� o0 N oO v' oe
yellow shading =active compliance monitoring wells with LEL > 5
light yellow shading = gas monitoring points installed for pilot test
Page 44 of 51

TABLE 7
Summary of Constituents of Concern
Corrective Action Evaluation Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-O43D
Benzene
MW-6, MW-7, MW-8, MW-9, MW-15R
5
MW-11SR, MW-11DR, MW-13SR, MW-14, MW-18
5
Vinyl Chloride (VC)
MW-6, MW-7, MW-15R
3
MW-11SR, MW-11DR, MW-14, MW-17S, MW-18
5
1,4-Dioxane (NCDEQ added
parameter in 2018)
MW-2, MW-7, MW-8, MW-9
4
MW-11SR, MW-11DR, MW-13SR, MW-13DR,
MW-14, MW-17S, MW-17D, MW-18, MW-19
8
.. i •
Benzene
MW-2, MW-6, MW-7, MW-8, MW-9,
MW-15R
6
MW-11SR, MW-11DR, MW-14, MW-16S
4
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
MW-8, MW-15R
2
None
0
1,2-Dichloroethane
MW-2
1
MW-11DR
1
Tetrachloroethane (PCE)
none
0
MW-11 DR
1
Vinyl Chloride (VC)
MW-1, MW-2, MW-6, MW-7, MW-8, MW-
9, MW-15R
7
MW-11SR, MW-11DR, MW-13SR, MW-13DR,
MW-14, MW-16S, MW-16D
7
CAER Period 2007 - 2011 COCs
Benzene
MSW Monitoring Wells
MW-1, MW-2, MW-6, MW-7, MW-8,
MW-9, MW-15R
# of Impacted Wells
7
C&D Monitoring Wells
MW-11SR, MW-11DR, MW-13SR, MW-13DR,
MW-14
# of Impacted Wells
5
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
none
0
MW-14
1
1,1-Dchloroethane
MW-15R
1
MW-11 DR
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
none
0
MW-11DR
1
Tetrachloroethane (PCE)
none
0
MW-11 DR, MW-16S, MW-16D
3
Vinyl Chloride (VC)
MW-1, MW-2, MW-6, MW-7, MW-8,
MW-9, MW-15R
7
MW-4, MW-11SR, MW-11DR, MW-13SR,
MW-13DR, MW-14, MW-16S, MW-16D
g
Historic COCs
Benzene
MSW Monitoring Wells
MW-2, MW-6, MW-7, MW-8, MW-9,
MW-15R
# of ImpactedImpacted
6
MW-11 DR, MW-12D, MW-14
3
Bromodichloromethane
none
0
MW-11 DR
1
Carbon Tetrachloride
MW-6
1
none
0
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
MW-9, MW-15R
2
MW-14
1
1,1-Dichlorobenzene
MW-2, MW-6, MW-7, MW-8, MW-9, MW-
15R
6
MW-11SR, MW-11DR, MW-12S, MW-12D,
MW-13SR, MW-13DR, MW-14, MW-16D
8
Chloromethane
MW-8
1
MW-14
1
Methylene Chloride
MW-6
1
MW-11 DR, MW-12D
2
Tetrachloroethane PCE
MW-6
1
MW-11 DR, MW-12D
2
Trichloroethene (TCE)
MW-6, MW-15R
2
MW-11 DR, MW-12D
2
Vinyl Chloride (VC)
MW-2, MW-6, MW-7, MW-8, MW-9,
MW-15R
6
MW-11SR, MW-11DR, MW-12S, MW-12D,
MW-13SR, MW-14
6
Note 1: Original compliance wells MW-1IS, MW-11D, MW-13S, and MW13D and their corresponding replacement wells MW-11 SR, MW-11DR, MW-13SR, MW-13DR were considered to represent the same general area, thus
the current well name is used in the table and report text for ease of discussion.
Note 2: COC lists include any well with at least one concentration reported greater than the corresponding 15A NCAC 02L groundwater standard, excluding estimated values.
Note 3: Monitoring wells MW-12S and MW-12D were abandoned after the October 2005 monitoring event, due to expansion of C&D landfill.
Note 4: Monitoring wells MW-16S and MW-16D were abandoned after the April 2019 monitoring event, replaced with MW-17S& MW-17D, due to expansion of C&D landfill.
T:\Greensboro-1580\Projects\2020\4358-20-043D Moore County Landfill\Task B - CAER Report\2022_caer tables.xlsx

TABLE 8
Record of Groundwater
Field Parameter
Data
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill,
NC Solid
No. 63.01
Aberdeen, Moore County,
North Carolinermit
y
I I
S&ME Project No. 4358.20.043D
Reporting
Background
R
Active
:r Monitoring
Wells
Active :r
Performanc
Monitoring Wells
M nitoring
& MNA
Wells
Closed MSW
Monitoring
Wells & MNA Performance
Monitoring
Wells
=
E
Parameter
Temperature (field)
Units
Celsius
Sample Date
04/28/06
16.00
18.00
r'
--
MWA 3S
-
MWA 3D
14.00
--
r'
-
17.00
16.00
r
16.00
--
--
--
--
for
16.00
he sed MSW
18.00
Landfill
-
16.00
15.00
14.00
17.00
17.00
13.00
18.00
19.00
--
(lab prior to Oct. 07)
Celsius
10/09/06
20.00
20.00
--
21.00
19.00
--
-
19.00
21.00
21.00
--
-
--
--
20.00
21.00
-
20.00
19.00
19.00
19.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
18.00
--
Celsius
04/24/07
17.00
17.00
--
16.00
16.00
--
-
16.00
19.00
17.00
--
-
--
--
19.00
19.00
-
18.00
17.00
17.00
17.00
18.00
16.00
20.00
18.00
--
Celsius
11/01/07
19.48
19.27
--
22.63
20.36
--
-
18.73
21.79
20.70
--
-
--
--
19.54
19.57
-
18.31
19.20
19.70
19.18
23.88
20.66
20.17
18.67
--
Celsius
04/23/08
14.83
17.56
--
16.92
17.97
--
-
16.55
18.28
19.26
--
-
--
--
16.55
16.83
-
14.84
15.59
14.80
16.52
16.28
16.61
17.82
17.33
--
Celsius
10/08/08
18.79
20.25
--
21.33
20.11
--
-
19.63
21.52
23.46
--
-
--
--
19.48
20.29
-
15.72
18.90
18.81
19.77
19.84
19.20
19.23
19.27
--
Celsius
04/13/09
14.55
16.64
--
14.52
15.95
--
-
16.11
17.99
17.69
--
-
--
--
15.24
16.47
-
14.94
14.91
14.86
15.82
16.55
14.09
18.62
17.43
--
Celsius
10/17/09
17.80
18.76
--
20.43
19.24
--
-
18.22
20.40
22.62
--
-
--
--
18.80
17.57
-
17.45
18.56
18.18
18.77
17.82
19.38
18.79
17.98
--
Celsius
04/26/10
16.23
18.63
--
16.30
17.85
--
-
16.85
18.44
20.91
--
-
--
--
15.66
16.52
-
14.40
15.51
14.85
17.05
18.24
16.05
18.45
17.25
--
Celsius
10/19/10
18.68
18.13
-
19.53
17.94
--
-
20.51
21.33
19.78
--
-
--
--
18.22
18.97
-
20.26
19.20
18.21
20.55
19.28
21.16
20.74
18.97
--
Celsius
04/18/11
15.48
18.09
--
15.69
17.59
--
-
17.16
19.67
22.01
--
-
--
--
16.10
17.19
-
17.39
15.45
15.45
16.95
19.00
15.23
21.49
19.89
--
Celsius
10/10/11
18.69
18.65
--
19.40
17.70
--
-
18.65
23.36
23.08
--
-
--
--
20.55
19.52
-
19.55
19.66
20.27
19.13
--
19.40
19.20
Dry
--
Celsius
04/17/12
16.60
18.06
--
17.34
19.68
--
-
17.29
20.47
21.08
--
-
--
--
16.25
18.15
-
17.55
16.39
16.11
18.01
16.55
16.42
19.29
Dry
--
Celsius
10/09/12
18.13
18.68
--
19.67
18.48
--
-
19.04
22.11
22.26
--
-
--
--
20.14
20.62
-
18.77
18.76
18.85
20.17
20.54
19.57
19.14
Dry
--
Celsius
04/15/13
14.23
18.63
--
15.72
16.97
--
--
16.64
19.06
19.35
--
-
--
--
14.23
18.08
-
15.28
14.26
14.04
16.92
17.86
16.11
19.24
Dry
--
Celsius
09/30/13
19.00
19.60
--
19.20
17.90
--
--
20.10
22.20
22.10
--
-
--
--
20.40
20.60
-
20.70
19.30
19.50
19.90
20.70
20.80
20.10
Dry
--
Celsius
04/16/14
12.90
17.30
--
14.60
16.40
--
--
14.80
14.80
17.10
--
-
--
--
14.00
15.80
-
13.20
13.70
13.60
15.20
16.80
13.80
17.10
Dry
--
Celsius
10/15/14
Dry
18.20
--
17.20
17.80
--
--
18.10
20.80
20.00
--
-
--
--
20.00
18.80
-
18.80
18.50
19.10
18.40
19.80
19.50
19.40
Dry
--
Celsius
04/15/15
13.69
16.40
--
13.65
15.35
--
--
13.47
15.42
16.12
--
-
--
--
13.52
14.29
-
13.71
13.38
13.45
14.21
14.37
12.66
16.53
Dry
--
Celsius
10/07/15
19.20
19.78
--
20.46
18.60
--
--
20.04
22.92
23.64
--
-
--
--
21.15
19.76
-
20.40
19.01
19.57
19.99
21.67
20.61
20.46
17.64
--
Celsius
04/11/16
15.60
16.88
--
14.93
16.25
--
-
14.61
15.73
20.15
--
--
--
--
13.71
14.90
-
14.06
14.90
15.70
16.20
16.30
13.72
16.65
17.80
--
Celsius
11/30/16
17.49
18.41
--
19.70
18.30
--
-
19.40
20.16
20.60
--
--
--
--
17.77
19.51
-
18.50
17.80
16.80
20.28
20.90
18.89
20.7
17.50
--
(Verification Event)
Celsius
02/09/17
--
-
--
-
--
--
-
--
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
17.80
--
Celsius
04/11/17
16.13
18.21
--
16.6
18.43
--
-
17.2
18.41
20.27
--
--
--
--
15.93
17.61
-
16.34
15.51
15.34
17.6
18.77
16.62
19.59
18.7
--
Celsius
12/12/17
15.0
17.9
--
18.5
17.8
--
-
18.0
18.9
16.9
--
--
--
--
14.2
15.7
-
16.2
16.0
15.1
18.2
13.9
17.5
18.0
17.8
--
Celsius
06/20/18
19.9
--
21.0
21.3
21.0
--
-
19.79
22.38
22.50
--
--
--
--
22.7
--
19.6
21.13
19.88
20.45
22.57
23.06
18.9
21.46
--
23.20
Celsius
11/27/18
16.2
--
17.1
18.7
16.9
--
-
18.9
20.4
19.1
--
--
--
--
15.5
--
19.0
15.9
16.3
15.5
18.8
18.6
15.7
19.5
--
17.60
Celsius
04/02/19
11.9
--
15.9
16.4
15.5
--
-
16.2
16.2
13.9
--
--
--
--
13.7
--
15.0
14.6
15.1
14.3
18.8
17.9
15.4
17.3
--
21.8
Celsius
11/19/19
17.2
--
18.9
18.6
18.2
--
-
19.0
-
--
19.1
17.1
--
--
17.4
--
19.7
18.1
17.5
16.8
19.4
18.6
18.5
19.4
--
18.9
(Verification Event)
Celsius
01/08/20
--
--
--
-
--
--
-
--
-
--
--
--
--
-
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
17.4
Celsius
04/07/20
15.3
--
19.9
16.2
17.0
--
-
16.4
-
--
20.6
22.1
21.3
-
15.7
--
18.0
--
--
--
18.5
17.8
16.8
20.8
--
19.7
(Verification Event)
Celsius
06/05/20
--
--
--
-
--
--
-
--
-
--
--
--
22.4
-
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Celsius
10/14/20
20.0
--
19.2
-
--
21.3
21.0
19.5
-
--
22.1
21.4
22.6
21.1
20.4
--
19.9
20.5
19.6
18.2
22.0
21.9
20.7
20.7
--
18.5
Celsius
04/13/21
17.2
--
18.2
-
--
17.7
19.8
19
-
--
20.4
20.9
21.1
16.6
16.1
--
18.3
NS
NS
NS
16.5
18.0
15.2
17.4
--
18.5
Celsius
10/19/21
20.8
--
17.7
-
--
18.7
18.0
20
-
--
21.8
20.7
21.5
20.1
19.8
--
17.1
19.2
18.1
17.7
21.8
24.0
21.6
22.8
--
19.2
Celsius
04/12/22
16.3
--
20.5
-
--
16.4
16.3
17.9
-
--
17.4
20.2
21.4
14.8
17.1
--
20.1
NS
NS
NS
16.8
20.9
19.4
20.7
--
18.9
Celsius
10/24/22
20.4
20.3
18.6
17.8
18.5
20.6
20.2
20.7
18.9
20.1
21.3
18.7
19
18.6
19.6
18.6
19.2
21.1
18.0
pH (field)
S.U.
04/28/06
4.90
4.70
--
-
5.40
--
-
5.90
4.70
4.70
--
-
--
-
5.10
6.30
-
5.00
6.10
5.00
5.90
5.90
6.10
6.40
5.50
--
S.U.
10/09/06
4.70
4.70
--
6.10
5.30
--
-
6.00
4.60
4.90
--
-
--
-
5.20
6.40
-
5.10
6.10
4.90
5.80
5.90
6.10
6.50
5.60
--
S.U.
04/24/07
5.00
5.10
--
6.10
5.10
--
-
5.80
4.60
4.70
--
-
--
--
4.60
6.20
-
5.30
6.00
4.80
5.60
6.00
6.00
6.30
5.60
--
S.U.
11/01/07
4.53
4.73
--
5.87
4.92
--
-
5.96
5.28
4.63
--
-
--
--
5.04
6.40
-
4.59
6.08
4.65
5.82
5.89
5.99
6.43
5.53
--
S.U.
04/23/08
5.63
5.85
--
8.16
6.55
--
-
8.00
6.59
4.98
--
-
--
--
6.07
7.78
-
5.55
7.20
5.89
7.19
7.62
7.62
7.50
7.46
--
S.U.
10/08/08
4.00
4.53
--
7.22
5.13
--
-
5.96
5.56
4.69
--
-
--
--
4.82
6.16
-
4.52
5.83
3.66
5.65
6.00
5.75
6.36
5.27
--
S.U.
04/13/09
4.52
5.31
--
5.62
5.10
--
-
5.92
6.02
4.13
--
-
--
--
5.05
6.23
-
4.76
6.08
4.65
5.70
5.70
5.55
6.38
5.42
--
S.U.
10/17/09
4.46
4.90
--
5.99
5.11
--
-
6.06
6.28
5.08
--
-
--
--
5.46
6.39
-
5.69
6.17
4.61
6.06
5.78
6.16
6.49
5.66
--
S.U.
04/26/10
4.20
5.10
--
5.41
4.54
--
-
5.68
5.65
4.99
--
-
--
--
4.42
6.05
-
4.53
5.74
4.28
5.62
6.02
5.31
6.23
5.48
--
S.U.
10/19/10
4.32
4.99
--
6.03
5.05
--
-
6.01
5.88
5.38
--
-
--
--
5.01
6.35
-
4.66
6.03
4.41
5.83
5.93
5.92
6.39
5.56
--
S.U.
04/18/11
4.11
4.63
--
5.62
5.00
--
-
5.62
5.87
5.18
--
-
--
--
4.72
6.13
-
4.39
5.59
4.17
5.36
5.68
5.55
6.04
5.41
--
S.U.
10/10/11
4.96
6.08
--
6.21
5.25
--
-
6.24
7.91
7.13
--
-
--
--
6.79
7.15
-
6.12
7.41
6.59
6.23
--
6.24
6.38
Dry
--
S.U.
04/17/12
3.46
4.69
--
5.38
4.68
--
-
5.74
5.92
4.62
--
-
--
--
3.91
5.86
-
5.33
5.56
3.88
5.76
5.80
5.57
6.38
Dry
--
S.U.
10/09/12
4.98
4.74
--
5.70
4.67
--
-
6.04
5.73
5.32
--
-
--
--
5.22
6.07
-
5.58
6.19
4.85
6.14
5.57
6.06
6.49
Dry
--
S.U.
04/15/13
4.28
5.28
--
5.77
4.70
--
-
6.04
6.07
5.52
--
-
--
--
4.71
6.67
-
5.19
6.26
4.02
5.95
6.12
6.04
6.57
Dry
--
S.U.
09/30/13
4.72
5.33
--
6.24
5.67
--
-
6.16
6.13
5.73
--
-
--
--
5.31
6.14
-
4.83
6.22
4.74
6.14
6.23
6.02
6.48
Dry
--
S.U.
04/16/14
5.00
6.19
--
6.72
6.07
--
-
6.47
6.61
6.50
--
-
--
--
6.16
6.70
-
5.28
6.46
5.14
6.41
6.64
6.29
6.77
Dry
--
S.U.
10/15/14
Dry
5.85
--
6.65
5.73
--
-
6.58
7.13
6.66
--
-
--
--
6.12
7.06
-
5.63
6.59
5.30
6.55
6.62
6.73
7.07
Dry
--
S.U.
04/15/15
3.01
5.56
--
6.74
5.93
--
-
6.48
6.57
6.33
--
-
--
--
5.93
5.86
-
4.61
6.09
4.40
6.33
6.44
6.36
6.97
Dry
--
S.U.
10/07/15
3.59
4.44
--
5.52
4.12
--
-
4.52
4.80
5.94
--
-
--
--
4.70
5.60
-
4.38
5.29
3.51
6.07
4.11
5.32
6.32
4.37
--
S.U.
04/11/16
3.75
4.87
--
5.07
4.87
--
-
6.29
6.32
5.58
--
-
--
--
4.94
6.42
-
4.81
5.78
3.82
5.66
5.70
5.27
6.41
5.61
--
S.U.
11/30/16
4.95
5.82
--
5.70
5.33
--
-
5.87
6.55
6.26
--
-
--
--
5.98
6.55
-
4.48
5.82
4.05
6.23
6.23
6.20
6.28
5.22
--
(Verification Event)
S.U.
02/09/17
--
-
--
-
--
--
-
--
-
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
6.38
--
S.U.
04/11/17
4.86
5.62
--
6.15
5.53
--
-
6.01
6.33
6.15
--
-
--
--
5.75
6.47
-
4.83
6.16
4.70
5.90
5.86
6.27
6.54
5.32
--
S.U.
12/12/17
4.48
5.55
--
6.12
4.99
--
-
6.13
6.29
5.99
--
-
--
--
6.00
6.35
-
5.32
6.13
4.28
6.07
5.45
6.19
6.40
5.70
--
S.U.
06/20/18
4.67
-
6.12
5.99
5.34
--
-
5.95
5.93
6.14
--
-
--
--
6.01
--
6.29
3.79
5.79
3.83
6.00
5.76
5.93
6.34
--
5.71
S.U.
11/27/18
4.61
--
5.77
6.2
5.67
--
-
6.38
5.9
6.15
--
-
--
--
5.97
--
6.44
4.12
5.59
3.82
6.45
6.46
5.51
5.51
--
6.11
S.U.
04/02/19
4.49
--
6.35
6.26
5.92
--
-
6.29
6.07
6.09
--
-
--
--
6.02
--
6.49
4.59
6.18
4.59
6.22
6.24
5.95
6.44
--
5.98
S.U.
11/19/19
4.33
--
6.19
6.26
5.31
--
-
6.30
-
--
6.27
9.08
--
--
6.29
--
6.32
5.33
6.00
4.39
6.16
6.01
6.32
6.50
--
5.95
(Verification Event)
S.U.
01/08/20
--
--
--
-
--
--
-
--
-
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
5.76
S.U.
04/07/20
4.18
--
6.15
6.05
5.49
--
-
6.31
-
--
5.92
9.76
6.22
--
5.8
--
6.2
--
--
--
6.14
5.87
6.16
6.54
--
5.83
(Verification Event)
S.U.
06/05/20
--
--
--
-
--
--
-
--
-
--
--
-
6.06
--
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
S.U.
10/14/20
4.4
--
6.4
-
--
6.1
5.3
6.4
-
--
5.9
7.6
6.3
6.1
6.0
--
6.5
4.8
6.1
4.6
6.2
6
6.1
6.4
--
6.1
S.U.
04/13/21
4.9
--
6.5
-
--
6.4
5.4
8.7
-
--
5.3
9.6
6.3
6.3
6.4
--
6.5
NS
NS
NS
6.3
6.4
6.1
6.5
--
6.2
S.U.
10/19/21
4.6
--
6.4
-
--
6.1
5.4
6.4
-
--
6.3
7.2
6.4
6.5
6.1
--
6.5
4.7
6.2
4.6
6.2
6.2
6.3
6.5
--
6.1
S.U.
04/12/22
4.7
--
6.6
-
--
6.2
5.4
6.7
-
--
5.0
11.3
6.0
6.1
6.0
--
6.3
NS
NS
NS
6.1
6.0
6.4
6.4
--
5.9
S.U.
1 10/24/22
1 5.2
1
6.8
9.3
9.2
6.1
8.8
8.4
5.5
6.1
1 6.2
6.5
1 4.2
5.9
4.0
5.9
6.6
6.5
6.1
5.7
T:\GreensbomI-Projecls\POPO\4358- N3D Moore County Len011Tazk B--Repon\2022raerTables-

TABLE 8
Record of Groundwater
Field Parameter
Data
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill,
NC Solid
No. 63.01
Aberdeen, Moore County,
North Carolinermit
y
I I
S&ME Project No. 4358.20.043D
Reporting
Background
Active
r Monitoring
Wells
Active :r
Performance
Monitoring
M nitoring
Wells & MNA
Wells
Closed MSW
Monitoring
Wells & MINA Performance
Monitoring
Wells
=
E
Parameter
Specific Conductance
Units
us/cm
Sample Date
04/28/06
21
r
56
r'
--
-
r
60
--
r'
-
370
194
r
77
--
r
-
--
--
for t
27
he ClosedoMSW
1144
Landfill
-
88
697
31
398
267
728
1788
241
--
(field)
us/cm
10/09/06
20
48
--
348
45
--
-
447
147
74
--
-
--
--
120
1206
-
103
635
34
398
328
622
1577
332
--
(lab prior to Oct. 07)
us/cm
04/24/07
19
74
--
273
47
--
-
430
172
61
--
-
--
--
98
957
-
105
621
43
323
479
594
1362
271
--
us/cm
11/01/07
27
66
--
338
47
--
-
499
556
91
--
-
--
--
132
1790
-
103
779
41
445
472
723
2170
300
--
us/cm
04/23/08
20
90
--
330
48
--
-
502
476
120
--
-
--
--
82
1532
-
90
705
32
179
499
403
2163
264
--
us/cm
10/08/08
17
105
--
999
215
--
-
457
529
684
--
-
--
--
90
1330
-
80
554
30
316
505
328
1773
245
--
us/cm
04/13/09
13
178
--
258
76
--
-
563
1160
148
--
-
--
--
123
1323
-
92
791
38
373
369
530
2214
315
--
us/cm
10/17/09
22
81
--
436
45
--
-
584
1115
184
--
-
--
--
216
1981
-
239
879
44
623
437
854
2270
403
--
us/cm
04/26/10
15
139
--
331
56
--
-
624
425
177
--
-
--
--
148
1645
-
76
717
40
379
653
551
2184
286
--
us/cm
10/19/10
20
97
--
387
74
--
-
679
670
207
--
-
--
--
129
1953
-
78
729
46
523
502
682
2199
384
--
us/cm
04/18/11
21
98
--
410
81
--
-
710
1406
235
--
-
--
--
142
1802
-
89
802
49
478
452
869
2395
392
--
us/cm
10/10/11
24
64
--
418
47
--
-
671
898
302
--
-
--
--
265
1452
-
281
855
53
699
--
1041
2342
Dry
--
us/cm
04/17/12
21
69
--
357
49
--
-
620
869
123
--
-
--
--
118
791
-
202
807
39
619
383
698
2328
Dry
--
us/cm
10/09/12
20
58
--
341
56
--
-
572
627
212
--
-
--
--
25
926
-
152
821
37
642
406
698
2092
Dry
--
us/cm
04/15/13
18
52
--
313
60
--
-
532
930
206
--
-
--
--
75
963
-
71
694
34
645
405
697
2176
Dry
--
us/cm
09/30/13
21
144
--
391
106
--
-
673
1227
359
--
-
--
--
102
1014
-
77
491
43
725
761
550
2303
Dry
--
us/cm
04/16/14
58
227
--
422
158
--
-
690
797
684
--
-
--
--
99
1103
-
95
534
54
769
697
671
2292
Dry
--
us/cm
10/15/14
Dry
105
--
420
91
--
-
710
2260
810
--
-
--
--
148
1186
-
120
580
88
920
640
1150
2360
Dry
--
us/cm
04/15/15
23
191
--
263
107
--
-
494
2030
846
--
-
--
--
398
728
-
87
576
40
523
300
455
1835
Dry
--
us/cm
10/07/15
23
180
--
361
82
--
-
739
670
633
--
-
--
--
118
1638
-
69
588
47
907
495
1085
2381
373
--
us/cm
04/11/16
19
243
--
261
133
--
-
625
1326
759
--
-
--
--
351
1804
-
53
467
53
818
521
564
1803
280
--
us/cm
11/30/16
19
263
--
321
102
--
-
780
1274
811
--
-
--
--
314
2095
-
53
454
46
917
516
850
2002
334
--
(Verification Event)
us/cm
02/09/17
--
-
--
-
--
--
-
--
-
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
2070
--
us/cm
04/11/17
20
234
--
366
92
--
-
806
1426
703
--
-
--
--
251
1925
-
55
641
51
890
298
1140
2217
312
--
us/cm
12/12/17
20
208
--
429
49
--
-
779
807
526
--
-
--
--
324
1443
-
160
756
64
891
460
984
2200
401
--
us/cm
06/20/18
23.0
-
781
346
80.6
--
-
820
449
604
--
-
--
--
399
--
1233
61
784
54
840
590
989
220.2
--
268
us/cm
11/27/18
19.6
-
786
287
131
--
-
863
299
529
--
-
--
--
451
--
1604
51.8
467
43.9
922
560
561
237
--
266
us/cm
04/02/19
445
--
800
257
164
--
-
729
380
581
--
-
--
--
445
--
1978
51.4
453
52
888
976
597
2016
--
359
us/cm
11/19/19
22.7
--
684
439
60.2
--
-
958
-
--
690
363
--
--
477
--
1421
155
548
69.4
626
366
1064
1376
--
356
(Verification Event)
us/cm
01/08/20
--
--
--
-
--
--
-
--
-
--
--
-
--
-
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
264
us/cm
04/07/20
17.4
--
668
259
113.4
--
-
937
-
--
525
454
969
-
336
--
1278
--
--
--
798
369
776
2041
--
348
(Verification Event)
us/cm
06/05/20
--
--
--
-
--
--
-
--
-
--
--
-
856
-
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
us/cm
10/14/20
19
--
754
-
--
318
88
944
-
--
582
328
1031
353
238
--
1487
48
469
53
806
445
1006
2005
--
461
us/cm
04/13/21
29
--
900
-
--
346
94
312
-
--
228
385
1241
824
883
--
1666
NS
NS
NS
935
843
821
1926
--
363
us/cm
10/19/21
26
--
735
-
--
350
93
1061
-
--
769
292
1029
197
267
--
1497
47
936
71
942
668
1272
2143
--
314
us/cm
04/12/22
35
-
842
-
--
406
111
1129
-
--
125
923
682
95
121
--
1275
NS
NS
NS
850
331
796
2175
--
422
us/cm
10/24/22
45
722
356
96
1068
444
266
625
233
308
1007
51
919
78
857
494
1098
2190
427
--
NM
NM
--
-
0.32
0.49
NM
--
7.79
1.02
-
7.02
0.59
4.19
0.63
0.44
NM
0.47
0.37
--
(lab prior to Oct. 07)
mg/L
10/09/06
6.59
NM
--
NM
NM
--
-
0.35
0.25
NM
--
-
--
--
0.50
0.41
-
1.32
0.38
2.23
0.36
0.55
NM
0.87
1.49
--
mg/L
04/24/07
10.02
NM
--
NM
NM
--
-
0.91
0.84
NM
--
4.26
0.99
-
6.37
5.25
4.26
0.90
1.19
NM
0.75
1.41
mg/L
11/01/07
8.02
NM
--
NM
NM
--
-
1.08
0.59
NM
--
-
--
--
2.17
0.40
-
7.26
0.64
4.93
0.75
0.33
NM
0.47
0.41
--
mg/L
04/23/08
9.65
1.69
--
2.29
2.49
--
-
1.48
1.58
2.43
--
-
--
--
4.50
1.55
-
5.66
1.53
6.74
1.78
1.66
2.24
2.20
1.60
--
mg/L
10/08/08
7.12
2.28
--
0.67
0.54
--
--
0.98
2.15
0.79
--
-
--
--
1.67
0.72
-
5.41
0.81
3.84
0.49
0.86
0.85
6.29
1.46
--
--
1.30
1.45
2.00
--
-
--
--
2.65
1.12
-
5.55
1.40
5.52
0.67
1.38
1.31
0.78
1.66
--
mg/L
10/17/09
9.10
0.88
--
0.89
1.37
--
--
1.04
1.15
0.95
--
-
--
--
1.80
0.85
-
1.84
1.23
4.89
0.74
0.55
2.05
1.05
3.97
--
--
1.05
1.28
1.21
--
-
--
--
1.06
0.28
-
4.23
0.91
5.52
0.54
1.98
1.08
0.70
0.96
--
mg/L
10/19/10
7.77
0.54
--
0.25
1.96
--
-
0.60
0.47
1.13
--
--
--
--
2.07
0.60
-
4.77
0.27
4.52
0.31
1.50
0.50
0.31
0.36
--
mg/L
04/18/11
8.02
0.46
--
0.89
0.97
--
-
0.55
0.62
0.89
--
--
--
--
1.90
0.25
-
4.94
0.59
5.15
0.65
2.38
0.77
0.59
0.72
--
mg/L
10/10/11
6.78
0.60
--
0.63
0.53
--
-
0.62
0.65
1.07
--
--
--
--
0.86
0.79
-
1.09
0.64
4.53
0.87
--
1.09
0.93
Dry
--
mg/L
04/17/12
9.09
1.00
--
0.24
1.78
--
--
0.91
1.01
2.73
--
-
--
--
1.44
1.31
-
1.58
0.68
5.64
0.29
7.01
1.07
0.88
Dry
--
mg/L
10/09/12
6.36
0.23
--
0.48
0.39
--
--
0.23
0.24
0.32
--
-
--
--
4.86
0.23
-
0.56
0.49
2.98
0.43
6.38
0.44
0.57
Dry
--
mg/L
04/15/13
8.50
0.86
--
0.83
0.89
--
--
0.81
0.82
1.21
--
-
--
--
2.97
1.04
-
5.34
0.73
6.64
1.13
40.5
0.54
0.41
Dry
mg/L
09/30/13
7.46
0.32
--
0.42
0.47
--
--
0.42
0.27
0.61
--
-
--
--
0.70
0.68
-
1.95
0.40
2.48
2.29
0.70
0.37
0.34
Dry
--
mg/L
04/16/14
8.20
0.33
--
0.77
0.49
--
--
0.53
1.79
1.79
--
-
--
--
7.87
0.49
-
6.04
0.39
5.89
1.05
1.55
0.48
0.36
Dry
--
mg/L
10/15/14
Dry
0.57
--
0.90
0.71
--
--
0.68
0.60
0.65
--
-
--
--
1.07
0.85
-
0.95
0.58
1.93
0.67
1.27
0.41
0.88
Dry
--
mg/L
04/15/15
7.24
0.89
--
0.84
0.86
--
--
0.86
0.59
0.68
--
-
--
--
0.53
0.61
-
3.19
0.59
4.00
0.96
1.72
0.75
0.69
Dry
--
mg/L
10/07/15
5.45
0.93
--
1.24
2.00
--
--
0.38
0.49
0.81
--
-
--
--
1.90
0.40
-
3.61
1.65
2.76
0.59
0.35
0.72
5.13
--
--
mg/L
04/11/16
7.77
1.85
--
0.87
1.16
--
--
0.53
0.58
1.30
--
-
--
--
1.17
1.01
-
3.42
0.87
3.93
0.92
1.21
0.82
0.54
mg/L
11/30/16
7.26
0.20
--
0.33
0.18
--
--
0.71
0.13
0.22
--
-
--
--
0.10
0.05
-
2.78
0.28
4.11
0.22
1.34
0.18
1.12
0.42
--
(Verification Event)
mg/L
02/09/17
--
-
--
-
--
--
--
--
-
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.88
--
--
mg/L
04/11/17
7.02
0.30
--
0.18
0.18
--
--
0.56
0.16
0.51
--
-
--
--
1.52
0.18
-
3.83
0.45
3.99
0.34
1.17
0.37
0.41
0.67
--
mg/L
12/12/17
6.79
0.23
0.25
0.25
--
--
0.24
0.25
0.45
--
-
--
--
0.84
0.24
-
1.71
0.39
2.38
0.26
--
0.35
0.38
0.41
--
mg/L
06/20/18
7.45
-
0.19
0.24
0.23
--
--
0.21
0.69
0.44
--
-
--
--
0.19
--
0.47
3.71
0.23
7.08
1.39
0.15
0.24
0.26
--
0.26
mg/L
11/27/18
6.34
--
0.36
0.19
0.28
--
--
0.21
1.45
0.23
--
-
--
--
0.22
--
0.17
2.80
0.42
3.17
0.2
0.26
0.38
0.1
--
0.25
mg/L
04/02/19
6.62
--
0.12
0.04
0.11
--
--
0.11
2.76
0.28
--
-
--
--
1.12
--
0.27
2.34
0.12
3.21
0.2
0.27
0.2
0.24
--
0.18
mg/L
11/19/19
6.26
--
0.21
0.14
0.10
--
--
0.21
-
--
0.14
1.98
--
--
0.80
--
0.20
1.00
0.30
2.2
0.44
0.96
0.36
0.24
--
0.28
(Verification Event)
mg/L
01/08/20
--
--
--
-
--
--
-
-0.30
mg/L
04/07/20
7.24
--
0.32
0.11
015
--
--
0.97
-
--
1.26
0.31
0.07
--
0.29
--
0.38
--
--
--
0.28
0.85
1.58
3.91
--
0.08
(Verification Event)
mg/L
06/05/20
--
--
--
-
--
--
mg/L
10/14/20
4.9
-
0.1
-
--
0.3
0.2
0.5
-
--
1.3
1.2
0.10
0.3
4.6
--
1.6
3.3
0.3
2.5
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.1
--
2.0
mg/L
04/13/21
5.4
--
0.4
-
--
0.1
0.2
0.6
-
--
1.9
0.6
0.50
0.4
0.2
--
0.2
NS
NS
NS
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
--
0.3
mg/L
10/21/21
4.5
--
0.3
-
--
0.2
0.2
0.2
-
--
2.5
1.8
0.20
3.8
0.2
--
0.3
3.0
6.2
1.8
2.1
0.3
0.2
0.2
--
0.2
mg/L
04/12/22
6.2
--
0.4
-
--
0.3
0.4
0.7
-
--
4.4
2.4
0.40
0.3
2.4
--
0.2
NS
NS
NS
0.2
0.6
0.3
0.2
--
0.4
mg/L
1 10/24/22
1 3.8
1
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.20
4.2
1 0.2
0.2
1 2.2
0.2
1.8
0.2
1.6
0.2
0.2
0.3
T:\GreensbomI-Projecls\POPO\4358- N3D Moore County Len011Tazk B--Repon\2022raerTables-

TABLE 8
Record of Groundwater Field Parameter Data
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63.01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358.20.043D
Parameter
Oxidation Reduction Pote
Reporting
Units
mV
Sample D. te
04/28/O6
Background
,
286
NM
--
NM
NM
--
Active
--
C&D Monitoring
31
Wells
265
NM
--
-
--
--
Active C&D
Performanc
239
Monitoring
M nitoring
-46
Wells & MNA
Wells
-
258
79
Closed MSW
254
Monitoring
2
Wells & MNA Performance
9
Monitoring
NM
Wells
-43
128
E
--
(field)
mV
10/09/06
232
NM
--
NM
NM
--
--
7
252
NM
--
-
--
--
194
-68
-
2.4
32
220
4
-2
NM
-7
--
(lab prior to Oct. 07)
mV
04/24/07
190
NM
--
NM
NM
--
--
9
224
NM
--
-
--
--
198
-77
-
168
32
220
-8
-38
NM
-60
22
-
mV
11/01/07
252
NM
--
NM
NM
--
-
-87
18
NM
--
-
--
--
180
-171
-
332
-48
331
-84
-119
NM
-123
-72
--
mV
04/23/08
60.9
65.2
--
-89.5
50.4
--
-
-58.2
31.1
134.8
--
45.7
-101.6
-
21.4
-4.7
67.1
-112.5
-113.5
-90.9
-81.7
-133.5
-
mV
10/08/08
223.0
164
--
-119
89
--
-
-45.3
66.1
179
--
-
--
--
217.6
-72.1
-
228
66.1
309.3
-106.6
-65.1
-32.1
-94.4
-60.7
--
mV
04/13/09
285.2
92.5
--
-22.8
119.4
--
-
-25.1
-16.3
332.2
--
-
--
--
214.4
-87.8
-
283.5
-8.3
292.0
-73.6
-28.5
-17.9
-90.9
-27.0
--
mV
10/17/09
296.9
192.7
--
-62.6
134.8
--
-
-48.3
-48.4
182.0
--
-
--
--
117.6
-92.5
-
36.9
-18.1
255.8
-54.6
-24.6
-59.9
-94.3
-16.4
--
mV
04/26/10
221.0
83.5
--
-52.3
118.0
--
-
-48.5
54.4
145.7
--
-
--
--
200.1
-86.7
-
172.8
28.0
173.3
-98.0
-42.7
-15.6
-85.9
-77.9
--
mV
10/19/10
282.2
104.9
--
-51.8
155.3
--
-
-44.0
71.1
132.6
--
-
--
--
208.2
-83.7
-
148.0
82.9
198.7
-81.7
-22.4
-48.9
-94.8
-109.6
--
mV
04/18/11
267.0
208.7
--
11.8
121.3
--
-
-30.9
-2.2
151.4
--
-
--
--
214.4
-62.8
-
223.4
45.2
220.0
-16.8
-44.7
12.8
-79.4
-5.1
--
mV
10/10/11
80.9
138.6
--
-70.1
87.4
--
-
-85.1
-25.9
61.8
--
-
--
--
97.3
-47.6
-
23.3
15.7
142.6
-86.3
--
-75.4
-102.4
Dry
--
mV
04/17/12
244.8
141.7
--
-5.4
126.4
--
-
-53.9
16.3
187.8
--
-
--
--
163.0
-27.9
-
67.2
138.4
180.8
-61.1
1.90
-24.4
-111.8
Dry
--
mV
10/09/12
106.2
85.8
--
-32.2
111.0
--
-
-76.4
13.1
60.8
--
-
--
--
89.8
-58.9
-
70.0
19.4
101.4
-79.3
-32.1
-53.2
-98.0
Dry
--
mV
04/15/13
198.6
170.1
-
-33.9
106.8
--
-
-74.4
-4.7
116.7
--
-
--
--
133.0
-86.8
-
193.0
86.5
214.9
-38.7
-60.7
-72.5
-113.4
Dry
--
mV
09/30/13
286.1
138.6
-
-33.2
104.8
--
-
-34.6
-3.3
81.0
--
-
--
--
213.2
-41.6
-
308.5
128.0
332.6
-45.7
-43.9
-16.4
-64.6
Dry
--
mV
04/16/14
338.3
40.4
--
-62.2
88.3
--
-
-60.0
4.9
31.3
--
-
--
--
232.2
-95.8
-
282.2
142.5
338.4
-59.3
-55.0
-39.8
-42.2
Dry
--
mV
10/15/14
Dry
209.1
--
-56.2
177.5
--
-
-38.6
-81.9
25
--
-
--
--
187.1
-77.9
-
245.9
58.8
394.5
-56.1
-21.9
-60.7
-103
Dry
--
mV
04/15/15
339.9
61.4
--
-52.6
6.8
--
-
-63.3
-53.7
16.5
--
-
--
--
-22.1
-9.1
-
90.4
-20.8
65.1
-55.9
-19.8
-36.6
-97.2
Dry
--
mV
10/07/15
115.6
3.8
--
-20.9
27.1
--
-
-61.1
-77.2
-116.5
--
-
--
--
-40.5
-182.9
-
18.1
-61.9
20.2
-73.1
-96.2
-100
-135.7
--
--
mV
04/11/16
373.4
50.4
--
-29.2
40.7
--
-
-55.3
-29.09
8
--
-
--
--
64
-70.3
-
189.7
105
354.2
-41.8
24.7
-14.6
-70.4
--
--
mV
11/30/16
230
34.9
--
-46
74
--
-
-73.8
-65.1
-18.0
--
-
--
--
58.6
-86.6
-
379
66.8
345
-75.8
-58.4
-56.7
-79.1
-27.60
--
(Verification Event)
mV
02/09/17
--
-
--
-
--
--
-
--
-
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
-92.9
--
--
mV
04/11/17
175
68.2
--
-35.9
85.5
--
-
-45.8
-29.1
9.6
--
-
--
--
120
-85.6
-
262
49.1
200
-38.5
56.4
-45.3
-61.4
11.8
--
--
-42.5
-65.4
-1.8
--
mV
06/20/18
417
-
-16.0
-20.3
109
--
-
-52.4
67.1
15.3
--
-
--
--
156
--
-66.1
196
178
166
-22.4
3.2
-29.0
-69.9
--
42.2
mV
11/27/18
298
-
-72.5
-29.9
42.6
--
-
-70.8
56.8
12.1
--
-
--
--
132
--
-81.8
257
59.4
287
-146
-90.6
-65.7
-103
--
-81.8
mV
04/02/19
270
-
-78.0
-65.7
14.4
--
-
-80.9
190.2
6.9
--
-
--
--
90
--
-94.6
194
98.8
419
-48
-77.2
-30.9
-78
--
-17.6
--
-42.0
--
-105.6
38.4
43.3
56.8
-133.4
-97.6
-124.6
-131.1
--
-123.1
(Verification Event)
mV
01/08/20
--
-
--
-
--
-157.7
04/07/20
419.5
-
-108.5
-40.2
35.6
--
-
-92.8
-
--
104.0
7.2
-88.3
-
19.0
--
-107.9
--
--
--
-86.7
-23.1
-81.6
-88.2
--
-49.6
(Verification Event)
mV
06/05/20
--
-
--
-
--
--
-
--
-
--
--
-
-65.7
-
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
mV
10/14/20
338.0
-
-81.0
-
--
-45
99
-88
-
--
67.0
-143
18.0
35.0
112.0
--
-103.0
204
65
352
-87.0
-23
-54.0
-105.0
--
-70
mV
04/13/21
233
-
-149
-
--
-86
110
-16
-
--
217
-86
-121
-46
-41
--
-122
NS
NS
NS
-98
-89
-57
-96
--
-83
mV
10/21/21
253
-
-85
-
--
-47
90
-95
-
--
-11
-61
-82
87
70
--
-99
224
108
221
-87
-89
-106
-101
--
-36
mV
04/12/22
327
--
-100
-
--
-19
132
-105
-
--
350
-32
39
191
187
--
-134
NS
NS
NS
-77
-18
-85
-135
--
-80
mV
10/24/22
-84
-252
-270
-263
-106
-203
-280
-272
100
-302
-270
181
157
254
-117
-191
-224
-133
-77
Turbidity(field)
--NM
NM--
-20
7.2--
-
-
--5.1
290--
70
7.8
12
55
86
NM
240
35
--
a poor toOct.
--
NM
NM
--
-
500
-
NM
--
-
-
--
120
850
--
65
55
34
210
500
NM
330
75
--
NTU
04/24/07
3.1
NM
--
NM
NM
--
-
300
1.5
NM
--
-
-
--
6
700
--
2.2
11
2.4
45
700
NM
350
400
--
NTU
11/01/07
116
204
--
243
415
--
-
95.1
137
116
--
-
--
--
330
>1000
-
39.4
96.3
99.1
116
105
151
155
111
--
--
20.2
45.1
--
-
3.91
12.4
3.33
--
12.2
369
-
2.71
8.15
4.35
9.36
29.2
7.07
67.9
15.8
--
NTU
10/08/08
2.46
5.68
--
46.6
6.21
--
-
8.06
20.1
2.11
--
-
--
--
5.77
286
-
3.94
1.03
1.11
7.37
47.9
4.75
90.4
30.4
--
NTU
04/13/09
2.26
9.91
--
9.42
13.7
--
-
12.6
28.8
2.33
--
-
--
--
6.49
38.2
-
3.98
17.6
15.8
--
69.4
15.6
16.7
81.5
--
NTU
10/17/09
3.17
2.32
--
25.0
2.89
--
-
5.96
24.0
3.20
--
-
--
--
52.8
85.4
-
13.3
4.02
3.52
4.18
207
7.79
30.8
36.8
--
NTU
04/26/10
5.07
5.83
--
18.2
5.54
--
-
2.67
17.7
7.09
--
-
--
--
6.69
648
-
6.23
4.92
4.20
13.0
37.4
10.9
61.0
32.9
--
NTU
10/19/10
17.8
0.43
--
39.2
6.73
--
-
<100
8.94
2.54
--
-
--
--
52.9
87.6
-
10.3
36.1
2.44
12.8
71.3
<100
23.0
8.36
--
NTU
04/18/11
30.2
100
--
20.0
26.1
--
-
12.1
35.8
22.1
--
-
--
--
35.4
145
-
32.1
13.0
78.9
8.57
83.7
12.8
19.0
12.1
--
NTU
10/10/11
35.9
57.7
--
10.6
26.4
--
-
66
15.6
76.7
--
--
--
--
15.8
52.8
-
35.8
6.70
5.13
15.2
--
18.7
11.5
Dry
--
NTU
04/17/12
31.6
51.2
--
21.5
26.8
--
-
80.4
95.4
18.1
--
--
--
--
64.0
84.9
-
76.6
74.0
7.35
25.8
97.6
22.5
91.5
Dry
--
NTU
10/09/12
20.1
5.77
--
2.04
18.8
--
-
9.06
19.3
24.7
--
-
--
--
64.7
47.3
-
32.7
2.57
2.25
14.7
82.0
41.7
17.8
Dry
--
NTU
04/15/13
15.8
14.6
--
15.60
44.3
--
-
12.7
26.1
30.9
--
-
--
--
71.5
200
-
46.5
9.02
7.47
129
55.4
57.9
33.9
Dry
--
NTU
09/30/13
12.1
26.4
--
8.75
13.7
--
-
16.3
12.1
51.3
--
-
--
--
52.5
44.6
-
33.1
9.06
7.12
36.7
30.5
24.7
61.0
Dry
--
NTU
04/16/14
24.2
30.1
--
13.8
17.4
--
-
18.5
24.1
52.5
--
-
--
--
58.8
82.6
-
51.2
8.42
19.1
46.5
47.5
16.9
19.0
Dry
--
NTU
10/15/14
Dry
24.7
--
17.2
13.6
--
-
10
51
39.9
--
-
--
--
62.7
93.6
-
53
2.06
3.81
18.6
46.6
7.03
66.2
Dry
--
NTU
04/15/15
35.7
26.1
--
13.2
24.9
--
-
18.4
29.0
142
--
-
--
--
18.8
48.5
-
21.0
4.76
1.21
22.3
31.1
36.9
11.8
Dry
--
NTU
10/07/15
4.85
10.1
--
30.1
45.5
--
-
9.19
11.0
3.83
--
-
--
--
39.5
724
-
25.4
0.99
0.78
19.3
32.6
1.81
8.6
25.20
--
--
18.1
148
-
10.4
2.23
0.77
16.5
10.7
1.34
22.60
94.1
--
NTU
11/30/16
6.9
1.05
--
5.6
10.8
--
-
3.11
13.1
4.71
--
-
--
--
8.64
32.8
-
23.3
1.80
1.21
11.7
64.3
5.62
8.54
60.0
--
(Verification Event)
NTU
02/09/17
--
-
--
-
--
--
-
--
-
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
-
--
7.59
--
--
NTU
04/11/17
7.89
5.43
--
4.85
9.97
--
-
4.48
8.26
25.4
--
-
--
--
33.3
220
-
11.7
2.03
0.72
8.47
19.0
6.31
8.31
34.2
--
NTU
12/12/17
5.14
4.33
--
4.79
4.68
--
-
15.5
10.8
8.62
--
-
--
--
40.8
28.3
-
28.8
4.74
0.13
7.36
5.97
8.12
6.76
19.7
--
NTU
06/20/18
6.11
--
6.36
9.22
9.91
--
-
820
7.93
8.13
--
-
--
--
9.38
--
4.97
9.98
7.76
7.08
9.89
5.98
5.01
7.63
--
6.34
NTU
11/27/18
2.40
--
9.87
6.83
7.05
--
-
2.11
9.69
6.25
--
-
--
--
8.00
--
4.49
9.80
7.64
1.41
9.99
6.79
5.01
9.95
--
6.34
NTU
04/02/19
9.14
--
2.09
9.69
5.26
--
-
5.28
2.51
132
--
-
--
--
8.52
--
3.62
8.50
5.74
3.92
8.26
16.4
18.8
9.58
--
9.60
NTU
11/19/19
1.36
--
1.40
2.83
6.10
--
-
3.89
-
--
9.50
8.99
--
17.0
--
0.54
19.4
3.74
1.73
9.36
20.4
7.01
8.14
--
9.98
(Verification Event)
NTU
01/08/20
--
--
--
-
--
--
-
--
-
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
7.90
NTU
04/07/20
0.73
--
3.01
4.02
8.98
--
-
0.87
-
--
9.40
6.04
9.65
--
9.90
--
1.78
--
--
--
8.94
4.61
7.62
6.00
--
9.74
(Verification vent
--
--
--
-
-
--
-
19.9
-
--
--
--
--
--
NTU
10/14/20
2.01
--
3.94
-
--
8.25
73
2.45
-
--
9.66
57
7.67
8.39
9.89
--
0.58
5.99
4.89
1.69
8.89
32.6
2.0
5.12
--
15.7
NTU
04/13/21
2.71
--
6.89
-
--
8.84
9.7
8.7
-
--
12.10
62.6
6.13
27
12.9
--
4.06
NS
NS
NS
13.8
8.86
4.2
1.66
--
12.6
NTU
10/19/21
2.3
--
2.91
-
--
8.58
3.6
5.94
-
--
9.3
35.9
9.10
10.1
22.7
--
1.58
5.45
3.0
2.8
11.9
9.94
9.3
4.25
--
5.0
NTU
04/12/22
1.1
--
4.90
-
--
6.90
6.4
7.3
-
--
5.0
11.6
33.60
30
31.8
--
2.70
NS
NS
NS
15.3
9.4
9.9
3.2
--
12.1
NTU
10/24/22
2.72
--
2.10
-
--
4.90
1.4
9.76
-
--
6.4
3.8
9.70
24.2
7.89
--
1.30
22.8
2.4
3
8.48
9.1
8.6
2.9
--
46.0
Notes:
1.) mg/L = milligrams per liter
2.) ND = not detected at or above the laboratory reporting limit
3.) NM = not measured
4.) uS/cm = microseimens per centimeter
5.) NTU = Nephelometric Turbidity Units
6.) S.U. = Standard Units
7.) Samples collected using low -flow purge and sample techniques (when possible).
T:\GreensbomI5 Prvjecls\POPO\4353- N3D Moore County Len011Tazk B-- Repo1\2022rae, Tables As

TABLE 9
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results - MNA Parameters
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
re
M
ZDatp.l
04/11/17
Nor
Background
MW-5
ND
MW-11DR
MW-13SR
Active
MW-13DR
:D Monitoring
MW-14
Wells
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-18
ND
MW-19
C&D Monitoring
MNA
MW-4
0.35
Performance
J
Wells &
MW-11SR
MW-1
ND
Closed
MW-2
ND
MSW Monitoring
MW-3
ND
Wells
MW-6
0.89
& MNA
J
Performance
MW-7
0.82
J
Monitoring
MW-8
Wells
MW-9
0.77
J
MW-15/15R
1.00
Sulfide
mg/L
mg/L
12/12/17
ND
--
0.54
J
0.16
J
ND
ND
ND
0.11
J
1.30
J
2.70
J
0.66 J
mg/L
06/20/18
0.01
0.1
ND
0.38
J
0.50
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.13
J
ND
2.70
J
ND
mg/L
11/27/18
0.01
0.1
ND
0.17
J
0.62
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.97
J
3.20
1.40
ND
mg/L
04/02/19
0.01
0.1
ND
1.50
0.46
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.65
J
0.57
J
1.70
0.21 J
mg/L
04/07/20
0.01
0.1
ND
0.83
J
0.42 J
0.16
J
0.28 J
0.16
2.70
1.00
0.58 J
mg/L
10/13/20
0.01
0.1
ND
0.22
J ND
ND
0.12
ND
ND
0.42
J
ND
ND
0.17 J
ND
ND
ND
0.16
ND
0.78
J
1.40
0.27 J
mg/L
04/13/21
0.01
0.1
ND
0.49
J ND
ND
0.37
ND
ND
0.30
J
ND
ND
1.10
NS
NS
NS
0.19
ND
1.10
1.60
0.35 J
mg/L
10/19/21
0.01
0.1
ND
0.04
J 0.02 J
ND
0.16
ND
ND
0.06
J
ND
0.07
J
0.05 J
NS
ND
ND
0.19
0.46
0.14
0.30
0.29 J
mg/L
04/12/22
0.01
0.1
ND
0.04
J ND
ND
0.05 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.08 J
NS
NS
NS
0.18
0.23
0.18
0.13
ND
mg/L
10/24/22
0.86
0.86
NA
ND
1.40
1.2
1.1
ND
1.8
ND
1.20
ND
1.30
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.10
3.80
1.20
ND
0.0
1
0.5
Chloride
mg/L
04/11/17
ND
--
--
--
--
42
43
ND
40
3.7
J
16
2.9
J
95
ND
mg/L
12/12/17
2
J
--
47
31
9.9
54
4.1
J
20
14
92
ND
mg/L
06/20/18
2.2
5.0
ND
6.9
44
34
ND
63
2.8
J
15
7.1
110
3.1 J
mg/L
11/27/18
2.2
5.0
ND
3.9
J
42
20
ND
30
2.7
J
16
6.3
120
ND
mg/L
04/02/19
2.2
5.0
ND
3.5
J
39
20
--
ND
29
3.8
J
13
5.0
94
ND
mg/L
04/07/20
2.2
5
ND
8.4
--
--
33
--
--
56
--
--
3.2 J
--
--
--
14
4.0
J
100
3.1 J
mg/L
10/13/20
2.2
5
2.5
J
21
7.7
5.8
52
22
3.0
41
14
8.9
27
2.3
J
38
5.5
13
20
69
100
D
2.9 J
mg/L
04/13/21
2.2
5
2.9
J
22
8.4
6.8
15
8.2
2.9
51
36
30
34
NS
NS
NS
13
10
50
99
D
3.1 J
mg/L
10/19/21
2.2
5
3.5
J
18
1.6
7
61
27
3 J
44
13
10
26
2.7
J
93
7.8
13
25
110
D
120
D
3.3 J
mg/L
04/12/22
2.2
5
3.6
J
19
14
8.2
64
5.2
3.5 J
34
26
2.8
J
19.0
NS
NS
NS
11
17
43
D
140
D
4.3 J
mg/L
10/24/22
2.2
5
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
59
16
ND
35
ND
ND
ND
3.4
J
73
ND
9
12
98
D
110
D
2.9 J
2.9
1
22.2
'
21.8
15.3
2.8
Nitrate as N
mg/L
04/11/17
0.240
J
0.100
J
14
--
0.950
J
0.180
J
ND
0.077
J
0
J
0.140
J
0.180 J
mg/L
12/12/17
0.550
J
0.130
J
0.280
J
0.600
J
1.100
J
ND
0.140
J
0
J
0.120
J
0.160 J
mg/L
06/20/18
0.025
1.000
0.450
J
0.120
J
6.000
J
0.840
J
1.700
J
ND
0.140
J
0
J
0.170
J
0.140 J
mg/L
11/27/18
0.025
1
0.410
0.170
4.400
1.200
0.050
J
ND
0.130
0
0.200
0.240
mg/L
04/07/20
0.025
1
0.320
mg/L
10/13/20
0.41
1
0.380
J
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
2.300
J
0.090 J
0.850
0.130
ND
0.110
0
0.120
0.100
0.510
mg/L
04/13/21
0.41
1
1.400
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
0.220
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
1
ND
ND
ND
mg/L
10/19/21
0.41
1
0.940
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
0.11
0.15
0.760
4.6
D
0.35
0.12
0.14
0.09
J
0.10
0.11
mg/L
04/12/22
0.41
1
2.400
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
1.60
0.08 J
NS
NS
NS
0.15
0.08
J
0.07
J
0.05
J
0.04 J
mg/L
10/24/22
0.041
0.1
NA
1.700
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
0.27
0.08 J
0.21
3.4
D
ND
0.05
J
0.12
0.07
J
0.07
J
0.06 J
0.879
3.24
0.17
Nitrite as N
mg/L
04/11/17
ND
19
J
0.030
J
ND
ND
ND
0.033
J
ND
ND
ND
mg/L
12/12/17
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
mg/L
06/20/18
0.017
0.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
mg/L
11/27/18
0.017
0.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.017
J
ND
ND
ND
mg/L
04/02/19
0.017
0.1
ND
27
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.098
J
ND
ND
ND
mg/L
04/07/20
0.017
0.1
ND
--
ND
ND
ND
0.038 J
mg/L
10/13/20
0.017
0.1
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
mg/L
04/13/21
0.017
0.1
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
mg/L
10/19/21
0.017
0.1
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
0.021
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
mg/L
04/12/22
0.017
0.1
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
0.023
J
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
mg/L
10/24/22
0.017
0.1
NA
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
0.022
J
ND
ND
0.025
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.017
J
ND
Total Dissolved Solids
mg/L
06/20/18
50
50
ND
ND
180
200
--
--
mg/L
11/27/18
50
50
ND
ND
160
110
mg/L
04/02/19
50
50
ND
ND
--
270
220
--
mg/L
04/07/20
10
10
ND
66
--
--
420
--
--
280
--
--
290
mg/L
10/13/20
10
10
ND
250
96
50
240
350
200
430
160
150
550
mg/L
04/13/21
10
10
ND
270
82
30
74
240
250
470
350
520
680
NS
NS
NS
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
mg/L
10/19/21
10
10
ND
200
78
ND
250
380
150
410
8
130
540
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
mg/L
04/12/22
10
10
ND
190
100
ND
300
ND
250
330
230
60
530
NS
NS
NS
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
mg/L
10/24/22
50
50
NA
190
230
94
50
230
230
170
410
160
76
96
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
T:\Greensboro1580\P.jeois12020\4358-26043D Moore County Landfll\Task 6 - CAER RepoA2022_- W.A.. Page 49 of 51

TABLE 9
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results - MNA Parameters
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
Le Monitoring
am
go
rSWSL
Background
Monitoring Well
:D Monitoring
Wells
AMC
MNA
Monitoring
Performance
Wells
for MSW
Closed
MSW Monitoring
Wells
& MNA
Performance
Monitoring
Wells
mg/L
�. -Landfill
04/11/17
MW-5
ND
MW-11DR
MW-13SR
D-
14
J
98
J
9.3 J
10
J
8.7
J
14
J
ND
3.5
J
NO
-0
Sulfate as SO4
mg/L
12/12/17
ND
11
J
38
J
10.0 J
16
J
10
J
8.9
J
ND
NO
1.8 J
mg/L
06/20/18
2.9
5.0
ND
ND
9.8
J
22
J
8.6 J
13
J
9.1
J
7.3
J
ND
NO
3.1 J
mg/L
11/27/18
2.9
5.0
ND
ND
8.1
29
7.6
5.2
7.6
9.2
NO
NO
1.1
mg/L
04/02/19
2.9
5.0
ND
ND
--
9.2
61
8.2
4.5
J
7.9
1.6
NO
NO
8.7
mg/L
04/07/20
2.9
5
ND
ND
--
--
35
--
--
NO
--
38
--
--
--
10
NO
NO
9.7
mg/L
10/13/20
2.9
5
NO
13
16
9.1
7.1
99
35
7
12
32
ND
8.0
5.5
8.4
7.2
NO
ND
NO
7.2
mg/L
04/13/21
2.9
5
2.9
12
18
10
19
20
33
45
23
110
14
NS
NS
NS
11
NO
ND
ND
6.8
mg/L
10/19/21
2.9
5
2.9 J
11
18
8
7
95
30
42
10
35
ND
9
17
11
7
NO
ND
ND
9.6
mg/L
04/12/22
2.9
5
ND J
9
22
9
6
8
25
44
20
14
7
NS
NS
NS
6
ND
ND
ND
6.5
mg/L
10/24/22
2.9
5
NA
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
NO
NO
ND
NO
9
ND
NO
4
J
ND
ND
ND
3.0
0.5
0
5.8
Total Alkalinity as CaCO3
mg/L
04/11/17
ND
150
470
NO
230
NO
200
110
920
110
mg/L
12/12/17
ND
170
350
49
290
D
NO
260
110
1,000
130
mg/L
06/20/18
14
15
NO
87
170
94
NO
310
NO
250
150
1,100
85
mg/L
11/27/18
14
15
ND
81
130
41
NO
180
NO
240
160
890
90
mg/L
04/02/19
14
15
NO
ND
--
120
20
--
NO
170
NO
ND
ND
710
40
mg/L
04/07/20
14
15
NO
51
--
190
--
--
140
--
--
170
--
210
110
740
83
mg/L
10/13/20
14
15
ND
220
49
ND
190
140
120
290
95
39
620
NO
180
NO
190
120
240
D
830
96
mg/L
04/13/21
14
15
ND
260
34
21
42
24
160
320
D
200 D
260
730 D
NS
NS
NS
240
300
230
D
760
110
mg/L
10/19/21
14
15
ND
210 D
43
3
220
190
97
31
D
45 D
60
470 D
NO
320
D
NO
210
D
89
D
310
D
900
D
40
mg/L
04/12/22
14
15
ND
270 D
76
23
300 D
NO
210
D 280
D
180 D
ND
590 D
NS
NS
NS
220
D
92
D
210
D
870
D
64
mg/L
10/24/22
5
5
NA
ND
210
49
24
250
110
84
240
57
97
350
8.6
330
NO
210
91
340
890
NO
0
85
Total Organic Carbon
mg/L
04/11/17
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
9.2
--
43
--
1
9.1
0.780
J
26
13
59
37
mg/L
12/12/17
ND
13
27
5
8.7
9.2
15
7.1
40
14
mg/L
06/20/18
0.34
1.0
ND
12
11
1.7
12
1.1
19
6.5
66
4.8
mg/L
11/27/18
0.34
1.0
0.470 J
15
9.3
2
7.8
1.0
25
6.0
68
3.3
mg/L
04/02/19
0.34
1.0
ND
12
11
1.1
6.2
0.95
J
56
9.4
42
43
mg/L
04/07/20
0.54
1.0
ND
--
--
--
--
--
--
26
17
32
1.7
mg/L
10/13/20
0.54
1.0
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
11
22
0.9
J
30
21
21
37
2.6
mg/L
04/13/21
0.54
1.0
1.0
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
42
34
NS
NS
NS
57
26
18
34
2.5
mg/L
10/19/21
0.54
1.0
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
14
21
1
13
2
18
28
26
39
2.2
mg/L
04/12/22
0.54
1.0
16
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
6
1 J
NS
NS
NS
17
18
20
43
3.5
mg/L
10/24/22
0.5
1.0
NA
1.8
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
17
11
2
10
2
7
14
24
36
NO
2
11
Nitrate/Nitrite as N
mg/L
04/11/17
0.24
0.120
14.0
--
0.950
0.180
NO
0.110
0.160
0.140
0.180
mg/L
12/12/17
0.55
0.130
2.8
0.600
1.100
NO
0.140
0.140
0.120
0.160
mg/L
06/20/18
0.041
0.1
0.45
0.120
6.0
0.840
1.700
NO
0.140
0.110
0.170
0.140
mg/L
11/27/18
0.041
0.1
0.41
0.170
4.4
1.200
0.050
J
NO
0.150
0.200
0.200
0.240
mg/L
04/02/19
0.041
0.1
0.32
0.110
3.6
1.000
0.048
J
NO
0.150
0.080
J
0.100
0.120
mg/L
04/07/20
0.041
0.1
0.32
--
--
--
--
--
0.089
J
0.095
J
0.099
J
0.110
mg/L
10/13/20
0.041
0.1
0.38 J
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
2.3
J
0.090 J
0.85
0.130
0.110
0.200
0.120
0.100
0.510
mg/L
04/13/21
0.041
0.1
1.40
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
0.22
NO
NS
NS
NS
ND
0.650
NO
ND
NO
mg/L
10/19/21
0.041
0.1
0.94
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
0.13
0.150
0.760
4.60
D
0.350
0.120
0.140
0.094
J
0.100
0.110
mg/L
04/12/22
0.041
0.1
2.40
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
1.70
0.075 J
NS
NS
NS
0.150
0.080
J
0.072
J
0.052
0.044 J
mg/L
10/24/22
0.041
0.1
NA
1.70 D
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
0.29
0.077 J
0
3
NO
0.052
J
0.120
0.066
J
0.066
J
0.062 J
3
1
0.121
0.168
T:\G-e .boro1580\P.jeois12020\4358-26043D Moore County Landfll\Task 6-CAER RepoA2022_-tabl.A.. Page 50 of 51

TABLE 9
Record of Groundwater Monitoring Results - MNA Parameters
CAER Report - 2022
Moore County Landfill, NC Solid Waste Permit No. 63-01
Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4358-20-043D
[enpI
Background
Active
:D Monitoring
Wells
MNA
Performance
Closed
MSW Monitoring
Wells
& MNA
Performance
Monitoring
Wells
0
D. -
MW_5
MW-11DR
MW-13SR
MW-13DR
MW-14
MW-17S
MW-17D
MW-18
MWA 9
MW-4
MW-11SR
MWA
MW-2
MW-3
MW-6
MW-7
MW_8
MW-15/15R
Ethane
mg/L
04/11/17
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
mg/L
12/12/17
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
mg/L
06/20/18
0.0013
0.002
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
mg/L
11/27/18
0.0013
0.002
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
mg/L
04/02/19
0.0013
0.002
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
mg/L
04/07/20
0.0051
0.006
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
mg/L
10/13/20
0.0051
0.006
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
mg/L
04/13/21
0.0051
0.006
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
mg/L
10/19/21
0.0051
0.006
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
mg/L
10/19/21
0.0051
0.006
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
mg/L
10/24/22
0.0003
0.0011
NA
NO
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ND
0.00063 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
0.00
0.00
Ethane
mg/L
04/11/17
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
mg/L
12/12/17
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
mg/L
06/20/18
0.0015
0.003
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
mg/L
11/27/18
0.0015
0.003
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
mg/L
04/02/19
0.0051
0.006
NO
NO
ND
NO
ND
NO
ND
ND
NO
NO
mg/L
04/07/20
0.0051
0.006
NO--
--
--
--
--
ND
ND
NO
NO
mg/L
10/13/20
0.0051
0.006
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ND
ND
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
mg/L
04/13/21
0.0051
0.006
NO
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
mg/L
10/19/21
0.0051
0.006
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ND
NO
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
mg/L
04/12/22
0.0051
0.006
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
NO
ND
NO
ND
mg/L
10/24/22
0.00031
0.001
NA
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ND
ND
NO
ND
NO
ND
0.00095
J
0.0018
ND
ND
0.00
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Methane
mg/L
04/11/17
0.496 J
5.06
0.372
0.636 J
0.099
NO
6.05
1.56
5.90
5.10
mg/L
12/12/17
0.567 J
1.67
0.879
0.264
0.012
NO
1.79
1.62
2.34
3.58
mg/L
06/20/18
0.45
1.00
ND
3.10
0.154
NO
0.041
NO
1.45
2.97
2.35
0.40
mg/L
11/27/18
0.45
1.00
NO
1.06
0.948
NO
0.019
NO
3.84
4.02
5.64
0.96
mg/L
04/02/19
0.45
1.00
ND
3.60
0.039
0.566 J
0.055
NO
4.06
5.93
5.04
2.08
mg/L
04/07/20
0.0051
0.006
ND
2.16
1.94
0.67
1.36
mg/L
10/13/20
0.0051
0.006
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ND
4.46
ND
ND
3.68
6.150
5.68 D
3.20
mg/L
04/13/21
0.0051
0.006
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
0.323
3.28
NS
NS
NS
12.4
5.91
D
6.370
D
ND
1.64
mg/L
10/19/21
0.0051
0.006
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
0.480
D
2.44
ND
0.824
ND
2.8
D
2.78
D
3.930
D
0.52
1.52
mg/L
04/12/22
0.0051
0.006
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ND
3.53 D
NS
NS
NS
4.7
D
2.81
D
4.460
D
2.30
2.79
mg/L
10/24/22
0.00057
0.00058
NA
0.730
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
0.240
7.80
0.660
0.11
0.00063
9.5
8.20
8.700
5.00
NO
0.224
0.429
W4.9
2.26
Carbon dioxide
mg/L
04/07/20
17.2
51
55.7
499
288
451
365
mg/L
10/13/20
21.6
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
573
55.7
5.24
47.5
429
D
406
D
462
J
729 D
425
mg/L
04/13/21
62.1
75.0
28.1
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
217
D
423
NS
NS
NS
ND
373
D
126
ND
242
mg/L
10/19/21
2.07
2.5
22.5
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
73
D
448 D
60.2
259
D 81.8
239
D
243
D
314
D
179
216
mg/L
10/19/21
2.07
2.5
13.0
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
23
D
424 D
NS
NS
NS
410
D
102
323
D
393
297
mg/L
10/24/22
1300
5000.0
NA
ND
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ANR
ND
ND
ND
ND
84000
ND
ND
NO
ND
NO
172
Notes:
ug/L = Micrograms per liter
ND = Not detected at the stated reporting limit
NM = Not measured
J = Estimated concentration reported below Solid Waste Section Limit
-- = No data available
Dissolved = Dissolved sample in brackets [e.g. a dissolved sample was analyzed for MW-9 for the Febuary 2017 verification event]
SWS Reporting Limit = NCPQL or lab -specific reporting limit prior to October 2007 and NCSWSL starting in October 2007 and ending June 1, 2018
Historical data prior to 10/30/07 provided by HDR Engineering of the Carolinas, Inc. Data 10/30/07 to 6/30/2020 Provided by Golder
Samples collected using low -flow purge and sample techniques.
Multiple dilutions were employed by the analytical laboratory for the April 2020 event: Chloride, Sulfate, Nitrate as N, Nitrate/Nitrite, Total Alkalinity as CaCO3, Antimony, Selenium, Thallium, Methane. Refer to the lab report for full details.
PQL = Practical quantitation limit - lab specific limit
MDL = Method Detection Limit
Cells shaded orange present calculated average concentrations for select MNA indicator parameters
T:\G-nsboro1580\P.jeois12020\4358-26043D Moore County Landfll\Task 6 - CAER RepoA2022_- tab. A.. Page 51 of 51

Figures

BLAKE RESIDENCE (CRAWL SPACE MONITORED) Q
W-2
100
cP-16
GROUND UBSCU ED 1 / -11 ` ..w 1� �° %6 �j-(
SEE ACCURACY
/ r"�' 37 GP-19 'J - �( ° /� ° r1 V J
11 ✓.✓" 2 f �(J�l l�l U
g 2 1 ° ° _. G a o m II
Z GP- 6 l�J 1 ♦♦ °°387.4 i� ` 12 10 9 �\�\ 9 Y7�1 e
P 74R ONED)�� / ° I 00 44. w4oww r
ACTIVE /320 ° �� Q r n Q
111C&D s 1vV0LANDFILL °8 CLOSED o O I ° z J Z
I. z J
2 l ' I -• ( I __LANDFILL \�<2 ✓ ° II III..*
C) O
E
MA-16D \ I O Q
MW- 7 3W-17D CE 6 \ ` c U
J
\ `\lO3P I QG 14 °
(ANDONED) \ 300 ~ z
H
o
3�71f 373., O
7
��-�j
� i f�° 0P1yygg ♦ ° � � w
%ems
W 1 P-13 381.20
359.13 3 .iGfiMDO ED - _ �-, o ° ♦ \ .. ;. ��O of
LLJ
co
000,
3 �INTENANCE SHOP �v _ �_� (ABANDONED)
_ z o
�SCALEHOUSE
/_1y I,356.60 � �\ \` / �NSFER STA
IND OBSCURED O
♦ \ `� __ ` `� \ f /
ACCURACY NOTE � �
\ / ` 66.84 f� a0
♦ 5 sW,B/
K SCALE:
° ° AS SHOWN
DATE:
REFERENCE: GENERAL SITE FEATURES, LANDFILL LIMITS OF WASTE, PARCEL BOUNDARIES PARCEL BOUNDARY F GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION JUNE 2023
AND WELL LOCATIONS PROVIDED BY GOLDER IN 2020. • • APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF WASTE 380.92 MEASURED GROUNDWATER ELEVATION IN MONITORING WELL PROJECT NUMBER
EXISTING 2 FT GROUND SURFACE CONTOUR O MONITORING WELL
EXISTING 10 FT GROUND SURFACE CONTOUR ABANDONED MONITORING WELL 4358-20-043D
STREAM, POND AND WETLAND LIMITS PASSIVE LANDFILL GAS VENTS FIGURE NO.
= EXISTING ROAD LANDFILL GAS TRENCH VENT
0 400 800 — — — MSW LANDFILL COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY SURFACE WATER SAMPLE
C&D LANDFILL COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY ABANDONED METHANE PROBE
POTENTIOMETRIC GROUNDWATER CONTOUR (5ft INTERVAL) A METHANE PROBE L
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) ESTIMATED GROUNDWATER PATHWAY C ESTIMATED GROUNDWATER PATHWAY NUMBER

BLAKE RESIDENCE (CRAWL SPACE MONITORED)
�- V N
a
--�� / Z0 0
-17
MW-15R cP-16
GROUND UBSCU ED -11SR •^ �- �(�(�
SEE ACCURACY OTE 7.4 3GPw19 j ' J_x� — � �� ° �// ° I 0
11 / /,\// 16.2 '' I ��` ° - O � \ `� 7�� 9.:ji� 4 3 2 Uj
GP- 6" \� ` �J 7.0 ✓ 'x 12 11 \�� \ 6 7
/ /
S
ND ' / / `7
59.62
` P-15R 4 ` ACTIVE / �i09 10.8 ' ° ° ` I O
r II
c
F LAND / °° ° ° ��O
ILL 320
CLOSED
O
MSW
` \ _\' ' '
\Mw-7 _-- LANDFILL31
165� 384gg7 1�f
1,3
6.7
.CELL 6 uMW 7 14R ' 10
361.90 I / i7 �
0
`Z4NED) � 30M ,r/
MW-13D-11 F
-
0
373.E
P-13 1 _
mw-1 360.0 ABANDONED)_
.00 MAINTENANCE SHOP �/ (ABANDONED)
28.0� ;, G
O
C
J z
J
O
z Ck�
Q
Q
J U
O
U z
LLJ LLI
c� Lu
�_&
ael
\ o / SCALEHOUSE
/ NSFER STAI1%LOFFICEE
OBSCURED 7 /
o
.URACY NOTE
4.0000
4.7
K SCALE:
° ° AS SHOWN
DATE:
ZEFERENCE: GENERAL SITE FEATURES, LANDFILL LIMITS OF WASTE, PARCEL BOUNDARIES PARCEL BOUNDARY [ NOT DETECTED JUNE 2023
AND WELL LOCATIONS PROVIDED BY GOLDER IN 2020. • • APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF WASTE O MONITORING WELL
EXISTING 2 FT GROUND SURFACE CONTOUR ABANDONED MONITORING WELL PROJECT NUMBER
EXISTING 10 FT GROUND SURFACE CONTOUR PASSIVE LANDFILL GAS VENTS 4358-20-043D
STREAM, POND AND WETLAND LIMITS )Z( LANDFILL GAS TRENCH VENT FIGURE NO.
EXISTING ROAD ❑ SURFACE WATER SAMPLE
0 400 800 — — — MSW LANDFILL COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY & ABANDONED METHANE PROBE
C&D LANDFILL COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY A METHANE PROBE
DEC. 2017 TOTAL VOC's ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) 4.7 DEC. 2017 TOTAL VOC's CONCENTRATION IN GROUNDWATER

BLAKE RESIDENCE (CRAWL SPACE MONITORED) Q
.2a III =
U
/ -17 1
GROUND OBSCU ED MW-11SR '�( _ _ /—_�L— / ✓ 0 0 0 o I ' Q
SEE ACCU.CY OTE �� 17.5 3 ` GPw19 / o� �( _ /// o r1
16.7 '' �` ° �`` .M -:\ ' 4 J3-` z ° / . G = o ° ° �� U (D
J.11�l 9 7 6 5 $ ° i �,
GP 6 f 0 43.6 ! 12 11 1U \�\ 6
MW-11. D 8 o / �O 1o °ooe°
' o p
S�4 3.6 ` �\ ; 1 1 o ° °° \\ ° \� s ° II z W
P-15R ' ` 1 1° �0///
1 1a
ACTIVE 32.1°Q
LANDFOILL1° A O ` �I J z
--� �9�FCP� ` 3Q` G 14 � \ \\�\ ` \ I —_��— ♦ ,/I o( l(l°o 1 /
.o %OO CLOSED
O~ J� / MSW I L
MW-7 LANDFILL O
3r�_�z0
MW-16 Q/\\ X31
197E, LQU17M 1DELL 6MW- 7' P-14R VW-D
361.90
(A NDONEC, \\ ` \ , 100 30Mo
�_ 6' °
R }} - o o i
V\ �NW-7gg 3.11 �},A � V\ °`1i
P-13 / 1 i j 14
359.13 360.9b ABANDONED)- ,. \\ 67.2 ° ♦ Q W
0
co
��--
MOTENAN SHOP -\ 7t---__ _— i \ (AB ED)
° o ANDON
i
/NIJSCALEHOUSE
1 ND / TRANSFER STA1%W.OFFICE
OBSCURED \ ` _` III ND
.URACY NOTE --- / v ,f - - _ /
� 1
J� ❑SW-3 f 1
9.2
—�
� s w-iA
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
DATE:
ZEFERENCE: GENERAL SITE FEATURES, LANDFILL LIMITS OF WASTE, PARCEL BOUNDARIES PARCEL BOUNDARY [ NOT DETECTED JUNE 2023
AND WELL LOCATIONS PROVIDED BY GOLDER IN 2020. • • APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF WASTE O MONITORING WELL
EXISTING 2 FT GROUND SURFACE CONTOUR ABANDONED MONITORING WELL PROJECT NUMBER
EXISTING 10 FT GROUND SURFACE CONTOUR PASSIVE LANDFILL GAS VENTS 4358-20-043D
STREAM, POND AND WETLAND LIMITS LANDFILL GAS TRENCH VENT FIGURE NO.
EXISTING ROAD ❑ SURFACE WATER SAMPLE
0 400 800 — — — MSW LANDFILL COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY & ABANDONED METHANE PROBE
C&D LANDFILL COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY A METHANE PROBE A
OCT. 2018 TOTAL VOC's ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR 4
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) 9.2 OCT. 2018 TOTAL VOC's CONCENTRATION IN GROUNDWATER

BLAKE RESIDENCE (CRAWL SPACE MONITORED) Q
.2a III =
\.Jlr ND
31'
0000
��� ` 1 MW-15R GP-180-01
/ �// ► 08 ��211.0
wry
GROUND OBSCU ED _11S I :.:/ i6" ° =� i�'!•// o ° o ° II °'
SEE ACCU.CY OTE / 19.1 3 W-� oo
` ��--GP-19 j%° ' 1�1� — �� ° r1
8.2 I swo J`: /j / s7 zs'"�' `°((a z 1 ° / U}
Q s O �� 9 7 6 6
`� o J 10.7 / /' 12 11 10
��10'' o ma�°
/� �'' ry % o�ii ( z
S�4 2.0 ;��►i °° °°� �s° II o Zw
P-65R 1e 1 0 0
ACTIVEz1.a 4° / C\\ II O w Q
i \ i LANDFILL 1 0 0 �° 32 0 11 -o O o I J Z
//,/'
' I CLOSED J o �o �—
/„ - J
_\_! I >MW-7 /4 7 Iy�} — LANDFFIILL
��f� 16 \ \ i ` 38�' I 1 \31 // J \ o ` �I z Q
M -16D y` r Ly
362.37 �� / 197.E \ �� w Q U
MW- 7 W-17D �CEL 6 \ i I l° , ��
oP 36 1.8 0.0 QG 14 \ _\\\ i _ 1I ° V
(A�NDONED) x , \- , 300 ° ` z z
ND �^ tl °so \ 0 0 0 o r� O O
i 1\ i r �NiW-1a6ft 37311 ` (\\ ° o — // O ;I 0 Z
un
20 11
391` --� O af
6.3 )
co
_
� MAINT NANCE SHOP
SCALEHOUSE
1 MW 3
TRANS libQ`OFFICE�
r
>m
OBSCURED \ r _r 5.4 �f % a
'URACY NOTE
�Syp_3
5.6
s �2r�
K SCALE:
° ° AS SHOWN
DATE:
ZEFERENCE: GENERAL SITE FEATURES, LANDFILL LIMITS OF WASTE, PARCEL BOUNDARIES PARCEL BOUNDARY [ NOT DETECTED JUNE 2023
AND WELL LOCATIONS PROVIDED BY GOLDER IN 2020. • • APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF WASTE O MONITORING WELL
EXISTING 2 FT GROUND SURFACE CONTOUR ABANDONED MONITORING WELL PROJECT NUMBER
EXISTING 10 FT GROUND SURFACE CONTOUR PASSIVE LANDFILL GAS VENTS 4358-20-043D
STREAM, POND AND WETLAND LIMITS LANDFILL GAS TRENCH VENT FIGURE NO.
EXISTING ROAD ❑ SURFACE WATER SAMPLE
0 400 800 — — — MSW LANDFILL COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY A ABANDONED METHANE PROBE
C&D LANDFILL COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY A METHANE PROBE
OCT. 2019 TOTAL VOC's ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR 15
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) 5.4 OCT. 2019 TOTAL VOC's CONCENTRATION IN GROUNDWATER

BLAKE RESIDENCE (CRAWL SPACE MONITORED)
v \
1
-17
GP-18
0
`��(L IGjI may(
GROUND UBSCUED . \ d - / M 19� Y� _
SEE ACCURACY DTE 23.5 3 W-11 }�GP-19 j `1�l �p ///
/� 16.5 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ " ` o-" O / 26 M 9a' lil/"i 4 3 2 OD
GP-16 • f 0 12.4 ✓ 11 10 6 7
♦ ♦ `o
♦ ♦ ♦'ter O
1.3
I P9.5R WKNDpNED1
ACTIVE i 38.14� \ II
t
C&D °
i / \ LANDFILL RRR 00 �° 32 "o {ja �I
CD o?� j ° II°
MSW
MW-7 _LANDFILL I \ <2 II
384 7
M`i-i 6D • �r II
MW- 7 W-17D `rcELL s\� �� / 20.1 ; /
36 3.1 6.6 IQG 14 �\ ` 'o-'�,,o // o
(AVNDONED) \\ , ` 30 q o 0 \
/►1�1a�6g2�i�
MW-1 19.9 ABANDONED
"28
i MAINNANCESHOP "_ �_ / - (ABANDONE D)
o
` \_
�426 / �
SCALEHOUSE
l 1.0 ` \ TRANSFER STA1%4OFFICE
UND OBSCURED /
` r � ND o
ACCURACY NOTE - ` i / M,
\ ❑SW-3\ n 0000
o
REFERENCE: GENERAL SITE FEATURES, LANDFILL LIMITS OF WASTE, PARCEL BOUNDARIES PARCEL BOUNDARY [ NOT DETECTED
AND WELL LOCATIONS PROVIDED BY GOLDER IN 2020.
■ ■ APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF WASTE O MONITORING WELL
EXISTING 2 FT GROUND SURFACE CONTOUR ABANDONED MONITORING WELL
EXISTING 10 FT GROUND SURFACE CONTOUR PASSIVE LANDFILL GAS VENTS
STREAM, POND AND WETLAND LIMITS )Z( LANDFILL GAS TRENCH VENT
EXISTING ROAD ❑ SURFACE WATER SAMPLE
0 400 800 — — — MSW LANDFILL COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY & ABANDONED METHANE PROBE
C&D LANDFILL COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY A METHANE PROBE
OCT. 2020 TOTAL VOC's ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) 10 OCT. 2020 TOTAL VOC's CONCENTRATION IN GROUNDWATER
z
W
Ow
z
�--*
J
J
L.L
z
J
L
L^
zo
Q�J
�
U
O
ozz
U
O o
C1� N
u
w
z
LLI
L LJ
u
OO
�Q
�
LLJ
Ow
co
O
O O
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
DATE:
JUNE 2023
PROJECT NUMBER
4358-20-043D
FIGURE NO.

BLAKE RESIDENCE (CRAWL SPACE MONITORED) Q
.2a-17 III =
GP-18
GROUND OBSCU ED MW-11 '^ *1
SEE ACCURACY OTE / /�6--
21.9 3 W-� GPw19 ' }�/v,��� J�/�( // o I Q 0
16 S ' ♦ 26 _ l�l"^ z
\♦Pf i ♦ 0 38.0 12 10 6 7 s s
76,920 OZ
l59.62 DONED) P\ `
\ ACTIVE � w 14 -a- 100
/�R /
I / \ ` LANDFILL �// 32.80 '° 32 -o �O ` o
RRR 0 ' CLOSED
MSWLL
MW-7 — —_LANDFILL I <2 II 'F7 / Ck�
`�r i6D(aM� 16S\ ` 384,g7' X31 // / \ �� o ` �� z O Q Q
MW-17 °'�W_1 `�cELL 6\� �� — .I / 28Vva \ 1 I 1 ��� \ �� j I� \\ W F�-+ _
°P 36 6.5 7.1 QG 14 \ ` / N ♦o ° `\\o u + ~
(ANDONEDi I �_" �; 30X o
o
3.33D ��- 10.2 r, lr" 0 \� �� O
— o
W_16• 373.1 \ e ♦ 1oo
\ 37 f _ V
-13R �� ��—__. _ ,, - ReV ° ° ,. �� ...� �� N � �
LLJ
M 34.7 V""'ONED
z.s ..,,,.-..f �^ / ,./ ,i ° ♦ II _ ♦ --� \ V O LLJ
co
M NTENAN SHOP = _ / (ABANDONED)
42.9
SCALEHOUSE
mw TRANSFER STAOFFICE�
OBSCURED \ ♦_ \ \ \ __ — ♦ I� _1 // f:,. O
.URACY NOTE - - \ / / ND ( - _ O
�\ 28.3 '0000, S�
/ ♦ sw-1'000-
/ /
0000
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
DATE:
ZEFERENCE: GENERAL SITE FEATURES, LANDFILL LIMITS OF WASTE, PARCEL BOUNDARIES PARCEL BOUNDARY [ NOT DETECTED JUNE 2023
AND WELL LOCATIONS PROVIDED BY GOLDER IN 2020. • • APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF WASTE O MONITORING WELL
EXISTING 2 FT GROUND SURFACE CONTOUR ABANDONED MONITORING WELL PROJECT NUMBER
EXISTING 10 FT GROUND SURFACE CONTOUR PASSIVE LANDFILL GAS VENTS 4358-20-043D
STREAM, POND AND WETLAND LIMITS LANDFILL GAS TRENCH VENT FIGURE NO.
EXISTING ROAD ❑ SURFACE WATER SAMPLE
0 400 800 — — — MSW LANDFILL COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY & ABANDONED METHANE PROBE
C&D LANDFILL COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY A METHANE PROBE
OCT. 2021 TOTAL VOC's ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) 1.6 OCT. 2021 TOTAL VOC's CONCENTRATION IN GROUNDWATER

- 1 �• P BLAKE RESIDENCE (CRAWL SPACE MONITORED) Q
.2a-17
III =
GP-18
GROUND OBSCU ED S / MW-11S •'" _ _ �' -�` �/ ° I ' ���jjj Q
SEE ACCURACY OTE // / 16.8 GPw19 ' �� �/ ` ° 0
11 / 1is
7.5 S ��•,` �` %27\_~ z 181
\ 9 7 6
` \ /y 1 � ♦ 00 p
10�
ssz 1 / °I I °` ° ° I Z
P-1sR �� p
ACTIVE 1 / / 40.114 ° ° 1 {�� W Q
LANDC&DFILL / 3z CLOSED ° J o O ° I Ei J ci Z
MSW ? I ,"/ L O
s\� 384
v7 _ —_LANDFILL I <2F ° �� I�� ' ~ Q
31 �/ \ �
1sD
MW-17 z-17D/CELL 6\� .00
_ � / 37.8
° 36 5.5 5.6 G ,14 \ I ♦j ` a(l t i/ ° ° U ~ H
/�(AVNDONED) \\\ ` � ..J► — ` 30�
.�..... o
0
/i " W-1 .373.E
° �. / Un L I
o /.�.�/L
`ems / I / \` Io°
M-, w 1 ABANDONED)_ / 1 �� \\ 90.4 / f ,
is LLJ
3o.a 1 \ n ° o v <
J _ - oW
� , a ��_ - � co
� AIN NANC SHOP (ABANDONED)
If
SCALEHOUSE
1.2 ` \ \ / TRANSFER STAOFF`E� O % s/ o�
p /
OBSCURED ` ` �/ / 3.0 (f.,... / O_
.URACY NOTE - � � _ 1 V ,f // � -' '
\ ❑SW-3�
18.3 /
% sw-1
ZEFERENCE: GENERAL SITE FEATURES, LANDFILL LIMITS OF WASTE, PARCEL BOUNDARIES PARCEL BOUNDARY [ NOT DETECTED
AND WELL LOCATIONS PROVIDED BY GOLDER IN 2020. • APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF WASTE O MONITORING WELL
EXISTING 2 FT GROUND SURFACE CONTOUR ABANDONED MONITORING WELL
EXISTING 10 FT GROUND SURFACE CONTOUR PASSIVE LANDFILL GAS VENTS
STREAM, POND AND WETLAND LIMITS LANDFILL GAS TRENCH VENT
EXISTING ROAD ❑ SURFACE WATER SAMPLE
0 400 800 — — — MSW LANDFILL COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY A ABANDONED METHANE PROBE
C&D LANDFILL COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY A METHANE PROBE
OCT. 2022 TOTAL VOC's ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) 1z OCT. 2022 TOTAL VOC's CONCENTRATION IN GROUNDWATER
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
DATE:
JUNE 2023
PROJECT NUMBER
4358-20-043D
FIGURE NO.
`!l
u

BLAKE RESIDENCE (CRAWL SPACE MONITORED)
C
GROUND OBSCURED a MW-11SR
SEE ACCURACY NOTE 3 �——,GP-19 "�,�
/ 2.2 370.4 1.7 1.3 J 27 28�l�l
2.6 MW-1 1.6 ♦� ` A _
GP-1 1.7 10
MV 11D 2.6 �387.47 '�
C,7o
1` •� \ s , QI W
<1 9.6AND0 EI 1 /
1.2 P 17 \\ ACTIVE / Mw-1a
\ ` C&D ' 1.9 ° 32�
o q 0�0 W J z
` \ LANDFILL / / ' 11 ' CLNOD Ogg o I'° U Z - J
\ /
_
MW-7 °f _LANDFILL ° II`
Or-I 0H 0
31 1\<15.�J `•��U
—MW-1 W-1 D ELL6 v
3 < P-14R r~/~
I H
f�S
(A NDONEDc) 30�13 ,((
\o / Iz--I OCal p
LU LLj
A
10'<7.2 .- - OLZZ„-13R /6 N. � CAA ''
MW-1 P-13 2.3 p�,I,
071J Sta
LU
00 MAINTENANCE SHOP / �1 = /" N
(ABA - ---_ �"✓ O
'\K SCALEHOUSE
< ' / TRANSFER STAll"%uFFICE
UND OBSCURED ` ` \ �� / 8 r,f p
ACCURACY NOTE
❑SW-3 _ \ n W-2 <1
0.86 J 1.2 J l�d
14
SW-1
Ky
SCALE:
° AS SHOWN
■ ■ PARCEL BOUNDARY XX BENZENE CONCENTRATION IN GROUNDWATER DATE:
APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF WASTE VINYL CHLORIDE ■ ■ EXISTING 2 FT GROUND SURFACE CONTOUR 1,4-D OXA E CONCENTRATION INON IN GROUNDWATERTER JUNE 2023
REFERENCE: GENERAL SITE FEATURES, LANDFILL LIMITS OF WASTE, PARCEL BOUNDARIES -
AND WELL LOCATIONS PROVIDED BY GOLDER IN 2020. EXISTING 10 FT GROUND SURFACE CONTOUR J ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION PROJECT NUMBER
STREAM, POND AND WETLAND LIMITS ug/L MICROGRAMS PER LITER 4358-20-043D
EXISTING ROAD O MONITORING WELL
MSW LANDFILL COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY ABANDONED MONITORING WELL FIGURE NO.
C&D LANDFILL COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY PASSIVE LANDFILL GAS VENTS
0 400 800 — — — BENZENE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR LANDFILL GAS TRENCH VENT
VINYL CHLORIDE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR ❑ SURFACE WATER SAMPLE
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) — 1,4-DIOXANE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR ABANDONED METHANE PROBE
METHANE PROBE A

♦
x�e�
T6 071
GROUND OBSCU ED
SEE ACCURACY �OTE
GROUND OBSCURED
SEE ACCURACY NOTE
EISW
0 300 600
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)
■ ■ PARCEL BOUNDARY
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF WASTE
1
I
N®4
474.8,
BLAKE RESIDENCE (CRAWL SPACE MONITORED)
aov2 // %
W-9 3.7 9 _ iJ
<10000Il
°D°°°
TAT R'fC - °
o F '
ZZ 0
EXISTING 2 FT GROUND SURFACE CONTOUR
EXISTING 10 FT GROUND SURFACE CONTOUR
STREAM, POND AND WETLAND LIMITS
EXISTING ROAD
MSW LANDFILL COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY
— — — —
C&D LANDFILL COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY
— — — —
BENZENE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR
VINYL CHLORIDE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR
1,4-DIOXANE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR
xx
BENZENE CONCENTRATION IN GROUNDWATER
VINYL CHLORIDE CONCENTRATION IN GROUNDWATER
1,4-DIOXANE CONCENTRATION IN GROUNDWATER
ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION
ug/L
MICROGRAMS PER LITER
O
MONITORING WELL
ABANDONED MONITORING WELL
x
PASSIVE LANDFILL GAS VENTS
LANDFILL GAS TRENCH VENT
❑
SURFACE WATER SAMPLE
ABANDONED METHANE PROBE
METHANE PROBE
MONITORING WELL SCREENED INTERVAL
v
MEASURED GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
MIDDENDORF FORMATION - SAND, SANDSTONE AND MUDSTONE. GRAY TO PALEGRAY WITH AN ORANGE CAST, MOTTLED; CLAY BALLS AND
Fe -CEMENTED CONCRETIONS COMMON, BEDS LATERALLY DISCONTINUOUS, CROSS -BEDDING COMMON
SCALEHOUSE
ELEV. (FT.)
440
L�
ELEV. (FT.)
420
400
380
360
340
320
300
MW-13 SR ug/L MW-13 DR ug/L
Benzene 0.54 J Benzene ND
Vinyl Chloride ND Vinyl Chloride ND
1 4-Dioxane 7.2 1 4-Dioxane 2.6
\ cn o
MW-19 ugL MW-18 ug/L / ACTIVE C&D
Benzene ND Benzene 0.71 J LANDFILL
Vinyl Chloride ND Vinyl Chloride 0.52 J
1 4-Dioxane 1.9 1 4-Dioxane 6.1
W o� .
Lu
1A —
MW-6 ug/L
o�c Benzene 2.2 MW-14 ug/L MW-7 ug/L
420 — a Vinyl Chloride ND Benzene 1.9 Benzene 0.811
1 4-Dioxane 1.3 J Vinyl Chloride 2.1 Vinyl Chloride ND
m co 14-Dioxane 11 14-Dioxane 9.3
cC
C
400 _ u
Z
Z /
380
360
340
320
I �
I
MW-7 ug/L
Benzene 0.81 J
Vinyl Chloride ND
1 4-Dioxane 9.3
CLOSED
MSW
LANDFILL
I
20
10
0
200 100 0
GRAPHIC SCALE
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 200'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 20'
MW-9 ug/L
MW-8 ug/L Benzene 3.7
Benzene 2.3 Vinyl Chloride ND
Vinyl Chloride ND 1 4-Dioxane 21
1 4-Dioxane 74
\
200 100 0
GRAPHIC SCALE
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 200'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " = 20'
20
10
1935 21st AVENUE SOUTH
NASHVILLE, TN 37212
[phone]
4358-20-043D
DRAWING NUMBER
10
i
m
0
z
_ _1 Z
_ _1
UJ
-
p O
Z <
a
j V
� O
O
Lu w
Of w

1 ,' w _t•
4
i
.�i
L T
'4,y .. . .. , - 1'• -.� yyy� .. ',`: e0 �� ••L' i ,a -TT : �lr[ l;'. 't '- � s
r
"' r'Y: • 1E
1 � I44
_ ..-..-.,� .. - :.. �•. .; ;w 4 _ Y „yl.;'il i r it x�ir
,�� �' I i J�•: �, �. '. 7 . _ - e-/I' 4 � 7 rv� �- ' :+ Fr ,'wvy"x
1:
- 4h
rf C
g, 4
yL•
y
l "
ti
i�p R
'J - ¢# - � .. • = .,tip i j S , � . .r}.ir
' ~ L
itLL.
z i .�-
�: rs. � �. L -----�--_ •_ '-o,+ - �iti'_ � {r L off. - - ' ` .yrF`i��
x
,
i
,
r
�.Y
c
i
[
r 1,
- . � -. i Y a -.. - .,: , : - _ '� , e - �, - 'alp, � . r ,s�. • a'F • :� Y
• ... der, � _. ,. � - , , , r' � .• '��' `.; ,.,i �,�_' � y'r r•.'_ r
' s
VL
mown
y ,
T r
!
13.
.r• .r►} y a��}{jp` .1 a•' - y i . ' 1 ' k s � � :i+. _ 'i ' � , I i. - �_
�y r 1 a •�7:d'•- � V"•�. _ I .�'. .:5.' w.i . iw Y� l_ 1 ,� Y, 1 _ ''��i A S• �.
r .. v3i• i. S. i'
k., i Y� '�... �..I`i ` d� • r4 ,. '1 -1 � .. I o'.. �. ,l .r -} l.. Y 7'----- i i y r%
�• _ �'(% � �_[• * - .. .��• �`y .� Y'• y,� • � Y .I� �'1 _ Tj;�� i �..- �'j { - �, 'rl 1 l .l -�' 's4�
�• .. 9b Tom` I• S � 1
7 3 l � K• i
r �: �
p 1.7'•'d
!�ZA
lop-
0000
r s y
-ftaft
r e
1 S
c
s
_ J,r.. ?. '.� • _ ` _ � ti, . .!1. 'tit
+` r. is ` yy
s , L a
S ,S Ay fY
• 6 �t• .] e4 i r S 't ._ 7C^ - , •R� •^yf � - �•�. i' V.. - qq y' /"lk
• - - i � � • � if' r rk � ..1' ri �.
44
It
JT
3. �- s' -- � !i .. - - - '. r• a��s . �•'� `�- :+ _ 3+" k , ` 1'. S5 r i � x y,; '1 � �', :
_
i• •t
• S L
+r
• gg
1• i
x'
n•
- :+ v . Y ,� � (� i y' � 1 ,{, Orr w � ,— � � • .
P
.. , •q
.. t, � '1' ' j' r - •h1 - .'j.L 1 ... `y' S7' .�3.. _ S" ... •�1, - R- .�� i! M1 ��',i i
1 C
-
+ ., ,...y ."'moo r. � .. .- - - - ''� - Y�• ".r
1 ..
,
'
S
..........
... _, - �, � ► • - � _ -,� #i .. .. � -l; ., . + . _ .. .� `,{ .:� � ' � ...� � , 'i'� kr1 �,'; f{Y•. J . �ti� � '.�rrp„� 1'! 'Y
, ,�� �': r :T '. jar z:' �.; , u,;�'� .t.'. , • '•�' '� � ! - — •+ � F: i
' p . �, _ _ y' ' .� ..=•n� � - � :' � 1, ;f 3Ler.i.K• , ryi•, 4y : i} � #Yy-� A' .� - ` , � T .;SQL i • F
V `,L - . � .� r� - / �� '�' .lo`l �� ♦`k� I - _ 'rf! ` +Mr '1 1' -ir
e tea- S � 1l�r�. o � _ i ,e�... . _ .�'• x � �4 ' 1,
r, , , i r 1 JJ f_ tea• +`v` _, - q: , '! m IJ l.t
• [L - '4 :;� a I��
. •1� -f'-�- i=•• TAT tr .P' _ ` r p� ti
, k
Y
r
,. ♦ .: .'::, .11 • .. .. .. .-.. •. 1F - ri s � yr.
.µ
t _
r J �
}�,
Y
.j.
• r 1 G
:r,. .,,., V €., A , ., ., iS "B � .: '; !' _. r� xrsv, '+. Yayk*r 1 i•/. 1 i �# �'�r i "�
'+Sr.�• •" -'. F .k .ysl, .�.y .,^�v • ..� � d �..� l yn. 71
•
Y .
•
:S
a
,
z
. I
w
.z
a
—
QQQ �
c
r
•
-
• i 1 E., q Y� d
_i['• ' x�� .11 1 I� y ',•r p r 1 1.
aV4
OF
I r i .■ r•• 4 •f1 ,
i f 1 t.
. tyy �i ` ' is „'� o _ } � �q"� '-fi" s: - .. - '�' .Y ryt,1 � :4 . � '� • 1s t �1; � +S � �'' .[ .
' i - ,''•"' `}i ,� .Y ¢. .'., Sa f �' i 1 .lyy. ' i ,i Y 1. �... � :� •I �1{ { '. T �'S �
F
L
• a.
1
v
,
"
r Al�
-
L `f
1 •
A.. .1
r
• L; . ; ,fir � .. �'j�- , �u ... '�,� _ _ ; „ p�
r qq Lys,
}
y
•
,
i
i
.h l
,,,,,,� ,
f "•=`�.i�';�
J14�1.,' �•" .. E' ..r. �'- � _ r. �- - � .. k '•1 r•��'� ':I."�nF�' _.- ��? ';. � ,y t ,P.
tL
e??Ik i�i. �. 'S +•• :»I . - �r'�p�gy "r : ` �[I r -•�• � � +��},i� :i '� � ya�.
•y#'r v .. .Sr �� ri�• b �1 .%� i riur�Y` : i -•s , � . ,S .� �_.
a
'x
t. •
f '' Y� � s ` o _ G,,�' � � i"/�'' '' ''1 a ,a. y�i E.�. 1F' f '•a �'- � i - _'. - � F � ' • "t1
�7s�,y1 1 � 1 y •,
'� 'vim1�` � ' �� e � - ' _ �' +�;,� �'• , ..• ' Si � x y.� , -'! .>+�,.,
�! �J.. - � - . �� r .f,.. ,L � 4� ";�a, • !tiRL'. �'1� x� :r ' ?'yf;����.:'. �•� �� � . ..L�t ^ L. 4'.
.Y • { -� 1�� r v't►.�Ls, E .� .� `L ti„! yi 5 ti .{ Ar.
��• • `l'• )'r ,"•'- ` .,y 1�', ,. ` -a ., fir' - .,Y'. 1. Y• ��.•l", • 1 �r. N' . . ! �;� ► .! ' .1
,
- ,]f� a .{, ___--__ i � ,� .y, .. .1.1, �'�y. '.1 ii111� ..� ,7 yG •F'4 �l
•�•,.a�. i• �� � 1 ; � w�'►' �a. -�.�' � �.. rG��,,.'� _ _ �'.•i /,�, I ' - - .4' t � 5 �E.fY I
'{' a -r�R r ,�y+� n�j, r+lS� �ypr �, ��. V ll' Y ' •i.. "� ' ;g �'. � 1
�' ll •1 E •�,� - Jr w ' �' i
ivy' 1,• -J'.., b •1 •''•
` r[''` T 4 {�' w "I�, ��� `s It s'.#. ; ill' ti. � • a� . 1.�'' - (�' ` .f• 4 ` t -
j iron.
I. _ 1
�� it •�" � ° _ ,. . _ . , � �..ryf. ; A , .
•� t.� r� 'S'►�„ ,'� 7'IRv '`'?�'�' .* • .�'-� y _!'' .i'� ,i� •p ? � n 1%1111* � [ : •y _ �i• - yI i% _ - x yr� �•
t
40
IL
♦
E s
1 F s
L i s`
P l ,
. (
•i. .'\, ,� " 'i �' �w1+• Sy .�;� ��{ry+A '� -' r'� YT ���, v . � `.>t'i,r, -I . � � _ � - f�� � ,
�s r - �. __ . _ _ .r.. . _ _ �_ _ _ � �. r. .. .. .. . _ � � \ is":. - :�' •..r�.�. ` . _ _ '�''ti.'�{ .1f"' 1
O
Z

Appendices

Appendix I - Well Logs

-
drilling Hechod:
Well Number: MW= Auger
Dace Started:
Drilling Fluids: Done
Date Finished- 6 ji me, B7 Static Water Level: Date:
Geologist/Engineer:Hayes Observed By:
Remarks:
O,.D.. of Borehole: 6.5"
ALL DEPTHS REFERENCED FROM GROUND SURFACE O j} of Casing-.--. 2.375'
- �_ Length of Screen:
1 0 . 1 0 !
LOCKABLE CAP 0. 01 �!!
Screen Opening Size:
PROTECTME C
ELEvxTiOm OF
GROUND SURFACE
E_ortland
Cr TPEI
2" Sch 40 PVC
{SIZE 6 TYPEi
BENTONITE
SAND
211 Sch 40 Pl
{StZ E a TV?
IP OISTANCE 2 • 3 3
0.0
.
I
H TO TOP OF SENTONITE 3..
4..5'
-K TO TOP OF GRAVEL
rH TO TOP OF SCREEN 6.47 r
r
'TH TO BOTTOM OF SCREEN 1La7_
1
rAL DEPTH
PROJECT SOIL& MATERIAL ENGINEERS, INC.
Moore Co„ Landfill RALEI GH , NORTH CAROLINA
Moore County, North Carola a
S C ALE: NTS
JOB NO;; 4112-87-146
FIG., NO::

due
20 „(
DESCRIPTION
ELEV. ,♦PENETRATION -BLOWS PER FT,'.
60 80 100
0 10 20 30 40
Medium Dense Tan Slightly Silty
Coarse SAND with Gravel (SP)
W
13
21
Loose to Medium Dense, Gray, Orange
Slightly Silty Clayey Coarse SAND
(Sp)
22
Boring Terminates at 20 ft.
BORING AND SAMPLING MEETS ASTM D-1566
CORE DRILLING MEETS ASTM D-2113
PENETRATION IS THE NUMBER OF BLOWS OF 140 LB. HAMMER,
FALLING 30 3N REQUIRED TO DRIVE 14 IN I D SAMPLER I FT
00 UNDISTURBED SAMPLE = WATER TABLE-24HR
150 % ROCK CORE RECOVERY WATER TABLE-IHR.
M
TEST BORING RECORD
BORING NO, � L --»
DATE DRILLED 6-�-87
JOB NO, 4112-87-146
SOIL & MATERIAL ENGINEERS, INC.

Well Number:, Mw-2 ! 6rfiling. Hethod:Auger _- -
Date Started: 6-6-87 _ Drilling Fluids:None n
Date Finished: 6-k-EZ Static Water Level: Date:
Geologist/Engineer: Haves Observed By:
Remarks:
ALL DEPTHS REFERENCED FROM GROUND SURFACE
LOCKABLE
PROTECTIVE C
Et.,EVATFOH OF
GROUND SURFACE
Portland
(TYPE)
211 i 40 PVC
(SIZE S TYPE]
B ENTOH[T£
SAND I
2" Sch 40 PV1
(SIZE % TTPt
PROJECT
Moore County Landfill
Moore County, North Caroli
O.,D,. of Borehole: tl
O.,D., of Casing: :1C; T ,
Length of Screen: 30-751 _
Screen Opening Size: 0-nin"
rP OISiAHCE
0.0
H TO TOP Of BENTOHITE 1 .35`
H TO TOP OF GRAVEL 2.42
M TO TOP OF SCR££N 7.52r
A DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREEN 17.77,
TOTAL DEPTH 20.0'
SOIL 5 MATERIAL ENGINEERS, INC. SCALE:. N.T.s
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA JOB NO:4112-87-146
FIG. NO:.

DEPTH
FT.
0
RE
13.0
20„(
DESCRIPTION ELEV. OPENETRATION--BLOWS PER FT.
n In 20 30 40 60 60 100
BORING AND SAMPLING MEETS ASTM D-1586
CORE DRILLING MEETS ASTM D-2113
PENETRATION IS THE NUMBER OF BLOWS OF 140 LB HAMMER.
FALLING 301N REQUIRED TO DRIVE 14 IN I D SAMPLER i FT.
UNDISTURBED SAMPLE WATER TABLE-24HR
_= WATER TABLE-1 HR.
ROCK CORE RECOVERY -
5.0
TEST BORING RECORD
BORING NO KW-2
DATE DRILLEDl=L=8-7 —
4112-87-146
JOB NO.
.--�-
SOIL & MATERIAL. ENGINEERS, INC.

Well Nusber: - 0 $rikfing Method: Auger _
Date Started:-6-6-87 Drilling Fluids: None
Date Finished:6-6-87 Static Water. Level: Date:
Geologist/Engi.neer:.Rgyps — Observed By:
Remarks: -
0,.D, of Borehole: 6•5"
ALL DEPTHS REFERENCED FROM GROUND SURFACE 2.375"
O.D. of Casing:
Length of Screen- 10.13`
LOCKABLE CAP
Screen Opening Size: nin" _
PROTECTrVE C
ELEvaTrON Of
GROUND SURFACE
Portland
(TYPE)
2'1,o�) 40 PI
(SIZE S TYPE)
B EHroN1TE
$AND
2" Sch 40 P
(SIZE & TYP'
IP DISTANCE 2.25
H TO TOP OF BENTOHITE i - 9
r
'H TO TOP OF GROVEL_ 3.0
r
H TO TOP OF SCREEN 5.75
•
1
DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREEN L5 . u —
TOTAL OEvrm 16.5
PROJECT SOILS MATERIAL ENGINEERS, INC. SCALE:, N.T.S.
Moore County Landfill RAL.EIGH, NORTH CAROLINA JOB NO" 4112-87-146
Moore County, North Caroli a FIG„ NO..

DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEV. *PENETRATION --BLOWS PER FT.
FT 0 10 20 30 40 60 80 100
14..0
16..`
Medium Dense to Loose Tan Slightly
Clayey Coarse SAND (SP)
11
4
i
Hard Tan, Pink Medium Sandy Silty CLAY(CL)
r
Boring 'Terminated at 16..5 ft.,
BORING AND SAMPLING MEETS ASTM D-1586
CORE DRILLING MEETS ASTM D-2113
cn PENETRATION IS THE NUMBER OF BLOWS OF 140 LB HAMMER,
FALLING 30 IN. REQUIRED TO DRIVE 1,4 IN.. I D SAMPLER I FT.
UNDISTURBED SAMPLE = WATER TABLE-24HR
�5C�°% ROCK CORE RECOVERY WATER TABLE-IHR,
5
TEST BORING RECORD
BORING NO. MW-3
DATE DRILLED
4112-87-146
JOB NO.
—
SOIL & MATERIAL ENGINEERS, INC„

Well Number:MGI-k __ • briiling Hetbod: Auger r
Date Started:&-6-87 Drilling Fluids: Hone
Date Finished: 6- - Static Water Level: Date:
Geologist/Engineer: Hav s Observed By:
Remarks'
O.,D„ of Borehole: "
ALL DEPTHS REFERENCED FROM GROUND SURFACE
O.D. of Casing: " _
''sill Length of Screen- "
LOC+CABLE CAP T I -
{1 Screen Opening Size:Q.OIO"
PROTECTIVE C
ELEVATION OF
GROUNO SURFACE
Portland
{TYPE)
2" S chC
(SIZE 9 TYPE)
B ENTOMTE
SAND
2" Sch 40 PVC
(StZE 6 TYP
IP DtSTA NLE 2.80
0.0
M TO TOP OF BENTOHITE
H TO TOP OF GRAVEL, 2.5
H TO TOP OF SCREEN
i
TN TO BOTTOM OF SC CEN 14.09
l
AL DEPTH 15.0
PROJECT SOILS MATERI AL ENGI NEERS, IN C.
Moore County Landfill RAL,EI GH, NORTH CAROLINA
Moore County, North Caroli I
a
SCALE",
JOB NO:
F I G .• NO'..
N.T.S.
4112-87-146

DEPTH
FT.
8„0
14.0
15.,0
DESCRIPTION ELEV. PENETRATION -BLOWS PER FT.
Loose Pink, Tan Slightly Silty Slightl
Clayey Coarse SAND (SP)
. 9
2
Very Loose ran, Pink Slightly Silty
Coarse SAND (SP)
9
tztt ink, an Medium Sandy7LAY
rn
Boring Terminated at 15„0
BORING AND SAMPLING MEETS ASTM D-I586
CORE DRILLING MEETS ASTM D-21I3
PENETRATION IS THE NUMBER OF BLOWS OF 140 LB HAMMER.
FALLING 30 IN.. REQUIRED TO DRIVE 14 IN I, D SAMPLER I FT.
UNDISTURBED SAMPLE — WATER TABLE-24HR
j50�% ROCK CORE RECOVERY -!--:—WATER TABLE -I HR.
I•1m
TEST BORING RECORD
MW-4
BORING NO,.
DATE DRILLED 6� 6—S7
,SOB NO. 4112-87-146
SOIL & MATERIAL ENGINEERS, INC.,

• method'.-- Auger
Well Number:_ W S - • dri ang
Dace Started- 6 R7 Drilling Fluids:
None
Static tracer Level: Date:
Date Finished: f,—R-87
Geologist/Engineer:_Hay.QG Observed By:
Remarks:
0„D,, of Borehole: 6.511
ALL OEPTKS REFERENCED FROM GROUND SURFACE D. of Casing'. 2.37511
Length of Screen:
J_OCKA8LE CAP I11 0OTt
1Screen Opening Size:.01 L
PROTECTIVE C
ELEVATION OF
GROUND SURFACE
Portland
(T"ET
2i1 Sch 40 PVC
(SIZE a TrpE]
BENTO wTE
SAND
2" Sch 40 F
(SIZE IL TTI
�P OISTANCE 2.91I
m.
3„40'
N To Top OF BENTONITE
fN TO TOP OF GRAVEL 5.0�
6.96
TN TO TOP OF SCREEN
PTN TO BOTTOu OF SCREEN 17 . 21,
i
TAL DEPTH 20.0
PROJECT SOILS MATERIAL ENGINEERS, INC
Moore County Landfill RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
Moore County, North Caroli a
S C ALE':.
JOB NO:.
FIG.. NO
N.T.S.
411.2-87-146

DEPTH
FT
DESCRIPTION ELM PENETRATION—BL01WS PER 7.
n in 20 30 40 60 80 100
4 „0
WIP
14
19..0
20..0
Tan Brown 5jigntiy
SAND (SW)
18
Medium Dense Pink Tan Slightly Silty
Clayey Coarse SAND (SC)
9
Medium Dense Pink -Tan Slightly Silty
Coarse SAND (SP)
12
Medium Dense Tan -Gray Silty, Clayey
Coarse to Fine SAND (SC)
6
Medium Dense Tan -Pink Slightly Clayey
Q
Boring Terminated at 20..0 ft.
*Coarse SAND (SP)
BORING AND SAMPLING MEETS ASTM D-1586
CORE DRILLING MEETS ASTM 0- 2113
PENETRATION IS 7HE NUMBER OF BLOWS OF 140 LB HAMMER,
FALLING 30 IN. REQUIRED TO DRIVE 14 IN I D SAMPLER I FT
UNDISTURBED SAMPLE = WATER TABLE-24HR.
I501% POCK CORE RECOVERY = WATER TABLE-] HR
9..5
TEST BORING RECORD
mw-BORING NO. 6.�- 8 --
DATE DRILLED---
JOB NO, 411-145
SOIL & MATERIAL. ENGINEERS, INC„

MONITORING WELL
INSTALLATION DIAGRAM
PROTECTIVE
DEPTH PIPE HEIGHT FT
BELOW
GROUND
SURFACE STICKUP FT
i o
1 FT
3 FT
5 FT
2.3 FT
GROUT MIX:
LEAN PORTLAND/BENTONITE SLURRY
-RENTQI.TE SEAL
1 BAG SENTONITE CHIPS. 50 LBS.
IMPERVIOUS ZONE:
3 FT THICK
PERMEABLE ZONE:
17 FT THICK
PEiZOMETER NO..: WW-6
BORING NO..: B-6
JOB NO..: 07625-001--018
PREPARED 8Y: C- WELTM
CHECKED By: C. LEE
DATE:. 3/6/95. _
EL. 403.5 FT.
TOP OF GROUND
SURFACE
PR TECTTVE METAL CASING
LOCKING
RISER PIPE: SCHEDULE
ASTM DESIGNATION: ---------
ID: __Z---- OD: ---------
COUPLINGS: - T1jBl6Qfp_w FT
PIPE IN _ 10 _ FT LENGTHS
PIPE FT
SCREEN _____.__ t 5 --------- FT
TOTAL:--------22.3------- FT
THICKNESS OF UPPER SEAL 2 FT
LENGTH OF SCREEN 15 FT
SAND 17 FT
20 FT }�
20 FT J BOTTOM OF BORING
R MARK ALL MEASUREMENTS TO THE NEAREST 0.1 FT.
HDR 6 vg. kr- MOORE COUNTY LANDFILL

f
PROJECT:
MOORE
COUNTY LANDFILL
PROJECT NO: 07625-001-018
LOCATION:
JACKSON HAMLET
60RING NUM13ER: 8-6
PAGE: 1 of 1
BORING
LOG
DATE: 3/6/95
NUMBER
DEPTH
SPT T WL SI
DESCRIPTION (USCS)
COMMENTS
UPPER 1', DENSE, BROWN, MED--GRAINED
4'
SILTY SAND W/ 1 /4 —1 /Z' QTZ PEBBLES
(SM), THEN 4 LIGHT GRAY, MASSIVE,
SS-1
12,20.21 SS
VERY FINE SILT (ML) OR CLAY (CL), THEN
3" DENSE, RED MED—GRAINED SILTY
8'
SAND (SM), DRY.
UPPER 3", LIGHT GRAY, MASSIVE, V. FINE
SS-
9,12,17 SS
SILT (ML) OR CLAY (CL), THEN V. FIRM,
VARIGATED BROWN TO MAROON COARSE
SILTY SAND W/SOME QTZ PEBBLES (SM),
DRY
SS-3
8,9,11 SS
INTERBEDDED, FIRM, YELLOW —BROWN,
FINE TO COARSE, SILTY SAND (SM), WET
EOH @ 20'
SS--4
8,10,12 SS
VERY FIRM, VARIGATED YELLOW —BROWN,
RED --BROWN, MAROON, COARSE TO VERY
COARSE, W/SOME QTZ PEBBLES, SILTY T
24'
CLEAN SAND (SM—SP), WET.
28'
32'
36'
40'
BOREHOLE COMPLETION:
20'
ILYL
!N - SCREEN
SS - SPUTSPOON
WATER
DEPTH:
13.9' BELOW GRADE
DATE: 3/ 13/95
SPT - SOL PDNETRJ D M
TEST-it'^M
ST - SHELBY TUBE
T - TYPE
v& - WATER LEVEL
DRILLING METHOD: HOLLOW STEM AUGERS
lir"IR
LOGGED BY:
C. WELTY

DEPTH
BELOW
GROUND
SURFACE
0 FT
2 FT
4 FT
of
MONITORING WELL
INSTALLATION DIAGRAM
PROTECTIVE
PIPE HEIGHT FT
STICKUP FT
GROLIT MIX:
LEAN PORTLAND/BENTONTE SLURRY
BENTQNITE AFC.'
I 9AG SENTONRE CHPS. 50 LBS_
IMPERVIOUS ZONE:
2 FT THICK
PERMEABLE ZONE:
17 FT THICK
PEIZOMIETFR No.: IJW 7
BORING NO, : 8-7
,108 No.,: 07625-001-018
PREPARED BY: C. WELTY
CHECKED BY: C. LEE
DATE: _ 3 fi 95 —
EL 399.2 FT.
TOP OF GROUND
SURFACE
PROTECTIVE METAL CASING
LOCKING
RISER PIPE: SCHEDULE ____ N
ASTM DESIGNATION:
ID: OD:
COUPLINGS: TFIffb=
PIPE IN 10 _ FT. LENGTHS
ppE __1-10 CUT 4 _8!z 1 FT
SCREEN 15 FT
TOTAL: 21.8 FT
THICKNESS OF UPPER SEAL 2 F
LENGTH OF SCREEN 15 FT
SMD 17 FT
19 FT _ Jf-1
20 FT _ _ BOTTOM OF BORING
imREMARK5: ALL MEASUREMENTS TO THE NEAREST 0.1 FL•
H R Etgkweer hg¢ >nc
MOORE COUNTY LANDFILL

s
PROJECT: MOORE COUNTY LANDFILL PROJECT NO: 07625-001-018
LOCATION: JACKSON HAMLET BORING NUMBER: B-7 PAGE: 1 of 1
BORING LOG DATE: 3/6/95
NUMBER DEPTH SPT T WL Sl DESCRIPTION (USCS) COMMENTS
UPPER HALF OF SAMPLE IS FIRM, VARIGATED
4' MAROON, COARSE TO VERY COARSE, PEBBLY,
SILTY SAND (SM). LOWER HALF IS VERY FIRM
SS-1 10,10,11 SS BRIGHT YELLOW -BROWN, FINE-GRAINED SILTY
SAND (SM), DRY..
8 1 DENSE, VARIGATED LIGHT TAN, YELLOW -BROWN,
MAROON, MEDIUM TO COARSE SILTY SAND WITH SOME.
CLAY RIP -UP CLASTS (SM), DRY
SS-2 13,17,21 SS
UPPER QUARTER OF SAMPLE IS VERY FIRM,
VARIGATED YELLOW -BROWN TO RED, MEDIUM
SILTY SAND (SM). MIDDLE HALF IS VERY FIRM,
1 6' 10,12,12 SS LIGHT GRAY, YELLOW --BROWN TO LIMONITE -YELLOW,
SS- 3 FINE CLAYEY SAND (SC) WITH A 1" -Z" SANDY CLAY
LENS BOTTOM QUARTER IS YELLOW -BROWN TO GRAY-
BROWN, MEDIUM TO COARSE SILTY SAND (SM), MOIST.
EOH ® 20'
SS-4 9,9,12 SS VERY RRM, VARIGATED LIMONITE -YELLOW, YELLOW -BROWN,
RED, mMOON, MEDIUM TO VERY COARSE SILTY SAND (SDI)
2 4' WITI.1 A Z' GRAY VERY FINE SILT (ML) OR CLAY (CL)
NDR BOTTOM, WET
28'
32'
36'
40'
BOREHOLE COMPLETION: 20' K Y
Si - SMEEN
55 - SPL[iSPooN
SPT - WL PDORADON
WATER DEPTH: 1 1 .9' BELOW GRADE DATE: 3/13/95 SHELBY TUBE
-
T - IYPE
WL - WATER LML
DR{LLING METHOD: HOLLOW STEM AUGERS
LOGGED BY: C WELTY

m
IE
DEPTH
BELOW
GROUND
>URFACE
0
5 FT I
f
MONITORING WELL
INSTALLATION DIAGRAM
PROTECTIVE
PIPE HEIGHT
STICKUP � FT 1 2.7 FT
R�,T M X..
LEAN POM LAND/BENTONITE SLURRY
NT N R
I BAG BENTONfIE CHIPS, 50 LBS.
IMPERVIOUS ZONE:
3 FT THICK
PERMEABLE ZONE:
17 FT THICK
PEIZOMETER KO.- 11W-8
BowNG NO. _ B-8
JOB NO.: 07625-001-018
PREPARED B1f: C. MiTy
CHECKED BY: C. LEE
DATE; 3/61.95
EL, 395.2 FT,
TOP OF GROUND
SURFACE
PROT CTIVE METAL CASIN
LOCKING
RISER PIPE SCHEDULE — 19
ASTM DESIGNATION:
ID: - OD:
COUPLINGS: THREAD FT
PIPE IN 10 FT LENGTHS
PtPE I —10 (gt T O 7.71 - FT
SCREEN 15 FT
TOTAL: 22.7
THICKNESS OF UPPER SEAL 2 F7
I
LENGTH OF SCREEN 15 FT
SAND 17 FT
20 FT
20 _ _BOTTOM OF BORING
gFM&EKS; ALL MEASUREMENTS TO THE NEAREST 0.1 FT.
HM Engkm ewi'1 b'r—
MOORE COUNTY LANDFILL

PROJECT: MOORE COUNTY LANDFILL
LOCATION: JACKSON HAMLET
BORING LOG
NUMBER DEPTH SPT T WL SI
PROJECT: NO: 07625-001-018
BORING NUMBER: 8-8 PAGE: 1 of 1
DESCRIPTION (USCS)
4 FILL TO 6-1/2'. THEN VERY FIRM, YELLOW
BROWN, VERY SILTY, MEDIUM TO COARSE SAND
SS-1 7,9112 SS WITH GRANULES (SM), DRY
8'
VERY DENSE, VARIGATED & INTEREEDDED, LIGHT
GRAY, LIMONITE -YELLOW, RED, GRAY, SLIGHTLY SILTY,
COARSS-2 13,21,33 SSWITH �}yp TVERY CH;CKSCLAYELL STRNOGERS, WIT
(SR)
VERY FIRM, YELLOW --BROWN TO RED, GRAY,
SLIGHTLY SILTY, COARSE TO VERY COARSE SAND
55-3 1 1 6'-j 10,10,11 1 SS
SS-4 �7SS
2 4'
28'
32'
(SP) INTERBEDDED WITH I- TO 6" BEDS OF HARD,
LIGHT REDDISH -GRAY, UASSINE FINE SILT (ML) OR CLAY
(CL), WET
EOH ® 20'
FIRM, MAROON, WELL SORTED SILTY MEDIUM -
GRAINED SAND (SM) WITH ONE C1/2' CLAY STRINGER,
Y&F.
36'
40'
BOREHOLE COMPLETION: 20'
WATER DEPTH: 10 5' BELOW GRADE,
DRILLING METHOD: HOLLOW STEM AUGERS
LOGGED BY: C. WELTY
DATE: .3/ 1 3/9 5
DATE: 3/7/95
COMMENTS
K Y•
si - SCREEN
SS - SPUTSPOoN
SPT - SOE PENEMATION
TEST-N NUMBER
ST -- SHELBY TUBE
T -- TYPE
wL - WATER LEVEL
r

w
DEPTH
BELOW
ROUND
;URFACE
11 FT
13 FT
15 FT
I
MONITORING WELL
INSTALLATION DIAGRAM
PROTECTIVE
PIPE HEIGHT FT
STICKUP - FT 1 2.4 FT
Sri MiX
LEM PORnAND/BC9TONITE SLURRY
DENTONITE
1 BAG BENTOMTE CHIPS, 50 LBS.
IMPERVIOUS ZONE:
13 FT THICK
PERMEABLE ZONE:
17 FT THICK
PEIZOMEIEK NO..: MW-9
BORING NO..:
8-9
J013 NO„; 07625-001-018
PREPARED BY:
C. WELTY
CHECKED BY:
C. LEE
DAB;
3L6195
EL. 403.7 FT.
TOP OF GROUND
SURFACE
P TECTN ME & Q&51NG I
LOCKING
RISER PIPE: SCHEDULE _ 40
ASTM DESIGNATION:
ID: - OD:
CW UNGS:._ RRE6Xp - FT
PIPE IN w._ 1 o Fr. LENGTHS
PIPE IN _ 1-1 o FT.. LENGTHS
PIPE _ 1--10 (CiiT 0 7.4' FT `
SCREEN 15 FT
TOTAL: 32.4 FT
THICKNESS OF UPPER SEAL 2 F
LENGTH OF SCREEN 15 FT
.. yI
SAND 17 FT
30 FT
30 BOTTOM OF BORING
gg ALL MEASUREMENTS TO THE NEAREST 0.1 FT.
m 8
OORE COUNTY LANDFILL
HDR

PROJECT:
MOORE
COUNTY LANDFILL
PROJECT NO: 07625-001-018
LOCATION:
JACKSON HAMLET
BORING NUMBER: B-9
PAGE: 1 of 1
BORING
LOG
DATE: 3/6/95
NUMBER
DEPTH
SPT T WL SI
DESCRIPTION (USCS)
COMMENTS
4'
UPPER 1' IS FIRM, `FELLOW -BROWN SLIGHTLY
SS-1
G,1O,17 SS
SILTY COARSE SAND (SP), GETTING RED DIRECTLY
ABOVE 2 -T GRAY SANDY CLAY (CL)_ LOWER PORTION
8
IS VERY qW, LIGHT TAN MEDIUM TO COARSE SILTY SAND
(SM), DRY..
SS-2
8.10,15 SS
VERY FIRMA, LIGHT TAN, FINE-GRAINED SILTY
CLAYEY SAND (SC -Sty), LOTS OF KAOUNITE, DRY.
1 5
SS
UPPER HALF OF SAMPLE 6 VERY FIRM, LIGHT TAN FINE
SS-3
11.12,15
TO MEDIUM, VERY SILTY SAND (SM).. LOWER HALF IS VERY
STIFF, UGiT GRAY, wSSNE, VERY CLEM, VERY FINE SILT (ML)
OR 0-P1Jl X CLAY (CL), DRY.
SS-4
15,18,23 SS
DENSE, VARIGATED GRAY, TAN, BROWN, RED,
COARSE SILTY SAND, WET..
24'
SS-5
13.14,19 SS
DENSE, VARIGATED, BLOOD RED, BLUE --GRAY,
DEEP TAN, RED -YELLOW, VERY COARSE TO COARSE,
2 8'
POORLY SORTED SILTY SAND, WET
EOH ® 30'
32'
36'
40'
BOREHOLE COMPLETION: 30,
sl - SCREEN
55 - SpuTspwN
WATER
DEPTH:
19 9' BELOW GRADE
DATE: 3/13/95
sf - sm P'fNETR nm
ST - s�Y �
T - TYPE
WL - WATER LEVM
DRILLING METHOD: HOLLOW STEM AUGERS
im
LOGGED BY:
C. WELTY

DEPTH
BELOW
GROUND
SURFACE
1.0 FT
3.0 FT
5.0 FT
PROTECTIVE
PIPE HEIGHT
MONITORING WELL
INSTALLATION DIAGRAM
382.34 FT
1.98 FT
GROUT MIX:
PORTLAND TYPE I CEMENT
BENTONITE SEAL:
3/8-INCH SEN70NITE PELLETS
IMPERVIOUS ZONE:
3.0 FT THICK
PERMEABLE ZONE:
17.0 FT THICK
MOORE COUNTY C&D LANDFILL
PEIZOMETER NO.: MW-11S
BORING NO.: B-115
JOB NO.: 07625-001-018
PREPARED BY: J. ISHAM
CHECKED BY:
DATE: _ 9/16/96
EL. 380.36 FT.
TOP OF GROUND
SURFACE
PROTECTVE METALOASING
4-INCH SQUARE BLACK STEEL
WELL BOX WITH LOCKING COVER
RISER PIPE: SCHEDULE _ 40 _
ASTM DESIGNATION:
ID: _-2 0-ilv_CL _ OD: _
COUPLINGS: __ ?HRADED FT
PIPE IN 10_0 FT. LENGTHS
PIPE--_L1)- I M. FT
PIPE — LL5.O FT
SCREEN _ M-5.O 1 _ t0.0 FT
TOTAL: 21.98 ------ FT
THICKNESS OF UPPER SEAL 2.0 FT
LENGTH OF SCREEN 15.0 FT
SAN D 17.0 FT
FT
20.0 FT BOTTOM OF BORING
REMARKS: ALL MEASUREMENTS TO THE NEAREST 0.1 FT.
N=_2,999.7523
E=2,914.1607
FDR En&ew nQ Ia.

DEPTH
BELOW
GROUND
SURFACE
0
26.0 FT
28.0 FT
30.0 FT
PROTECTIVE
PIPE HEIGHT
MONITORING WELL
INSTALLATION DIAGRAM
383.05 FT
3.02 FT
GROUT MIX:
PORTLAND TYPE I CEMENT
BENTONITE SEAL-
3/8-INCH BENTONITE PELLETS
IMPERVIOUS ZONE:
28.0 FT THICK
PERMEABLE ZONE:
12.0 FT THICK
MOORE COUNTY C&D LANOFILL
PEIZOMETER NO.: Mw-11D
B0RING NO.: B-1 ID
JOB NO.: 07625-001-018
PREPARED BY: J. 15HAM
CHECKED BY:
DATE: . _.-_. 9/16/96
EL. 380.03 FT.
TOP OF GROUND
SURFACE
PROTECTIVEMEIAL CASING
4-INCH SOUARE BLACK STEEL
WELL BOX WITH LOCKING COVER
RISER PIPE:
SCHEDULE
__ 40__
ASTM DESIGNATION: --------
ID: _.�9 �iNCH _ OD:
----
COUPLINGS:
THREADED FT
PIPE IN _ 10.0
FT
LENGTHS
PIPE------.C1J=3_0Z
--M
FT
PIPE _-_�3��?
0_ 0 ----
FT
SCREEN
�_10.0__-_-_
FT
TOTAL: _43_02 __--__ Fi
THICKNESS OF UPPER SEAL 2.0 FT
LENGTH OF SCREEN 10.0 FT
SAND 12.0 FT
FT -- - - - - - - -
40.0 FT - - - - - - - - BOTTOM OF BORING
REMARKS: ALL MEASUREMENTS TO THE NEAREST 0.1 FT.
fDq N=3 01 1 .4497
E=2,914.0764
MDR Er4roerina kr-

PROJECT: MOORE COUNTY C&D LANDFILL
PROJECT NO: 07625-001-018
LOCATION: HIGHWAY 5, ABERDEEN, NC
BORING LOG
NUMBER I DEPTH I SPT I T I WL I S1
BORING NUMBER: B-1 1 D PAGE: 1 of 1-
DATE: 9/ 16/96
DESCRIPTION (USCS) I COMMENTS I
4'
SS-1 17 SS v TAN, MEDIUM TO COARSE GRAINED, MEDIUM -
DENSE CLAYEY SAND (SC), MOIST, SLIGHTLY
8' PLASTIC, MOTTLED MAROON AND BROWN.
SS-2 6 SS TAN, YELLOW TO BROWN, COARSE TO VERY
COARSE -GRAINED, LOOSE SAND (SM), WET,
MOTTLED, IRON OXIDE STAINING.
SS-3 1 6' 20 SS TAN, YELLOW, MAROON, WHITE, MEDIUM -DENSE,
COARSE TO VERY COARSE -GRAINED SAND (SM),
VERY WET, MOTTLED, IRON OXIDE STAINING.
SS-4 21 SS SAME AS ABOVE (SM), MEDIUM TO COARSE -
GRAINED, ALTERNATING LENSES OF MAROON,
24' WHITE, YELLOW AND TAN SAND WITH FINES, WET.
SS-5 24 SS SAME AS ABOVE (SM), MINOR CLAY STRINGERS
28' (GRAY), WET
SS-6
19
SS
=
WHITE TO TAN, COARSE -GRAINED, MEDIUM -DENSE
I
-
SAND (SM), MOTTLED YELLOW, MAROON AND
BROWN, WET, FINES MIXED
_-
AT
SS-7
36'
17
SS
NO SAMPLE OBTAINED DUE TO HEAVING SANDS.
-� ORILLIIv
-
24 H
BOREHOLE COMPLETION: 40 FEET BELOW LAND SURFACE
51 - SCREEN
SS - SP�IT5Po0N
WATER DEPTH: 6.75 FEET BELOW LAND SURFACE DATE: 9/17/96
5� �NENUr .
ti
ST - SHELBY TUBE
T -rfPE
DRILLING METHOD: 4 1/4—INCH HOLLOW STEM AUGERS
a
WL - WATER LEVEL
m
LOGGED BY: J. ISHAM
0
Q
�►�
a

DEPTH
BELOW
GROUND
SURFACE
PROTECTIVE
PIPE HEIGHT
1.0 9FT-
3.0
5,
0FT
MONITORING WELL
INSTALLATION DIAGRAM
392.35 FT
2.72 FT
GROUT MIX:
PORTLAND TYPE I CEMENT
QENTONITE SEAS,:
3/8-INCH BENTONITE PELLETS
IMPERVIOUS ZONE:
3.0 FT THICK
PERMEABLE ZONE:
77.0 FT THICK
i
MOORE COUNTY C&D LANDFILL
PEIZOMETER NO.: MW-12S
BORING NO: 8--12S
JOB NO.: 07625-001-018..
PREPARED BY: J. ISHAM
CHECKED BY:
DATE: _ 117/96
EL. 389.63 FT,
TOP OF GROUND
SURFACE
PROTECTIVE MLIAL CASING
4-INCH SQUARE BLACK STEEL
WELL BOX WITH LOCKING COVER
RISER PIPE: SCHEDULE ,..40__
ASTM DESIGNATION:
ID: _-_0_ �NQH-- OD: ---------
COUPLINGS: THREADFQ___ FT
PIPE IN __10.0 __ FT. LENGTHS
PIPE FT
PIPE _�1 $ Q ------ FT
SCREEN _�L-5.0;�_ 10A __ FT
TOTAL: ______ 22.72 _ FT
THICKNESS OF UPPER SEAL 2.0 FT
LENGTH OF SCREEN 15.0 FT
SAN D 17,0 FT
FT
2 0.0 FT
- - - - - BOTTOM OF BORING
REMARKS: ALL MEASUREMENTS TO THE NEAREST 0.1 FT.
-- N=2L532.2047
E 2-965.3629
:.'R =Blgh9er hgl klr-.

PROJECT: MOORE COUNTY C&D LANDFILL PROJECT NO: 07625-001-018
LOCATION: HIGHWAY 5, ABERDEEN, NC BORING NUMBER: B-12S
PAGE: l of 1
BORING LOG
DATE: 9/17/9E
NUMBER
DEPTH
SPT
T
WL
Si
DESCRIPTION (USCS)
COMMENT
4'
—
YELLOW —BROWN TO TAN, MEDIUM —DENSE,
SS-1
25
SS
—
_
MEDIUM TO COARSE —GRAINED CLAYEY
SAND (SC), SLIGHTLY MOIST, MOTTLED,
g,
IRON OXIDE STAINING.
!
=
LIGHT GRAY TO WHITE, DENSE FINE TO
VERY FINE—GRAINED SAND (SW), MINOR
VERY UNIFORM
SS-2
.34
SS
_
FINES, SLIGHTLY KAOLINITIC, VERY MOIST,
TEXTURE
_
-
—
_
IRON OXIDE STAINING.
TAN, YELLOW, WHITE, MAROON AND BROWN,
SS-3
1 6'
10
SS
LOOSE, COARSE TO VERY COARSE —GRAINED
-
=
SAND (SM), MOTTLED, WET, MIXED WITH
FINES
T D = 20 FEET
24'
28'
.32'
AT
��
36,
DRILLI
24 Yr"
40'
BOREHOLE COMPLETION: 20 FEET BELOW LAND SURFACE
K Y:
S! - SCREEN
SS - SPUTSPOON
WATER DEPTH: 12.36 FEET BELOW LAND SURFACE DATE: 9 18 96
/ /
TESTNENU BP.
I
ST - SHELBY TUSt
T - TYPE
WL - WATER LEVEL J
DRILLING METHOD: 4 1/4—INCH HOLLOW STEM AUGERS
DF
LOGGED BY: J ISHAM
�'

J
MONITORING WELL
INSTALLATION DIAGRAM
DEPTH PROTECTIVE
BELOW PIPE HEIGHT
GROUND
392.28 FT
SURFACE 2.68
F7
0
26.0 FT
28.0 FT
30.0 FT
GROUT MIX:
PORTLAND TYPE I CEMENT
BENTONITE SEAL:
3/8-INCH BENTONITE PELLETS
IMPERVIOUS ZONE:
28.0 FT THICK
PERMEABLE ZONE:
12-0 FT THICK
MOORE COUNTY C&D LANDFILL
PEIZOMETER NO.: MW� 12D
BORING NO.: 8--120
JOB NO: 07625-001-018
PREPARED BY: J. ISHAM
CHECKED BY:
DATE: 9/17/96
EL. 389.60 FT_
TOP OF GROUND
SURFACE
PROTECTIVE METAL CASING
4-INCH SQUARE BLACK STEEL
WELL BOX WITH LOCKING COVER
RISER PIPE: SCHEDULE
ASTM DESIGNATION: -_--___--
ID: _��o _1N� OD: --
COUPLINGS: TFIREADl.D___ FT
PIPE IN 10�0 FT LENGTHS
PIPE �L1�_6_8FT
PIPE 13��1 �_� FT
SCREED ----- FT
TOTAL: 42.68 -__ _ FT
THICKNESS OF UPPER SEAL 2.0 FT
LENGTH OF SCREEN 10.0 FT
SAND 12.0 FT
FT
40.0 FT _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ BOTTOM OF BORING
REMARKS: ALL MEASUREMENTS TO THE NEAREST 0.1 FT.
N=2,526.1117
E=2 961.6329-
MDR F-ng neenng, kv-.

PROJECT: MOORE COUNTY C&D LANDFILL PROJECT NO: 07625--001-018
LOCATION: HIGHWAY 5, ABERDEEN, NC BORING NUMBER: 9-12D
PAGE: 1 of 1
BORING LOG
DATE: 9/17/96
NUMBER
DEPTH
SPT
T
WL
SI
DESCRIPTION (USCS)
COMMENTS
4'
I
TAN TO YELLOW AND BROWN, MED.-DENSE,
FINE TO COARSE -GRAINED SAND (SM),
IRON OXIDATION STAINING, MOTTLED,
SLIGHTLY MOIST.
SS-1
19
SS
81
TAN, YELLOW, WHITE, MAROON AND BROWN,
FINE TO VERY FINE—GRAINED, DENSE SAND
SS-2
38
SS
(SM), SLIGHTLY CLAYEY, HORIZONTAL COLOR
_
-
MOTTLING, SLIGHTLY MOIST
_
SAME AS ABOVE (SM), COARSE TO VERY
COARSE -GRAINED AT TOP GRADING TO
MEDIUM TO COARSE -GRAINED AT BASE, WET
TAN, MEDIUM -DENSE, MEDIUM TO COARSE—
GRAINED SAND (SM), MOTTLED MAROON,
WHITE AND BROWN, WET,
SS-3
1 6'
35
SS
SS-4
23
SS
24'
NO SAMPLE RECOVERED DUE TO HEAVING
SANDS.
SS-5
20
SS
28'
.32'
—
AT
DRILLING
—
24 HR
BOREHOLE COMPLETION: 40 FEET BELOW LAND SURFACE
KEY:
St - SCREEN
SS - SPLITSPOON
SPT TION
- s� HENS BER
ST - SH LBY TUBE
T - TYPE
1Nl - WATER LEVEL
WATER DEPTH: 12.47 FEET BELOW LAND SURFACE DATE: 9/18/96
DRILLING METHOD: 4 1/4—INCH HOLLOW STEM AUGERS
LOGGED BY: J. ISHAM

W
0
m
ct
0
0
DEPTH PROTECTIVE
BELOW PIPE HEIGHT -
GROUND
SURFACE
O
1
3.0 FT
I•�a"
MONITORING WELL
INSTALLATION DIAGRAM
388.88 FT
2.53 FT
GROUT MIX:
PORTLAND TYPE I CEMENT
BENTONITE SEAL:
3/8-INCH BENTONITE PELLETS
IMPERVIOUS ZONE:
3.0 FT THICK
PERMEABLE ZONE:
17.0 FT THICK
FT
za.oFT �---
MOORE COUNTY C&D LANDFILL I
PEIZOMETER NO.: MW-13S
BORING NO: B-13S
JOB NO: 07625-001-018
PREPARED BY: J. ISHAM _
CHECKED BY:
DATE: 9/18/96 _
EL. 386.35 FT,
TOP OF GROUND
SURFACE
PROTECTIVE METAL CASING
_4-INCH SQUARE BLACK STEEL
WELL BOX WITH LOCKING COVER
RISER PIPE: SCHEDULE
ASTM DESIGNATION: .......
ID:-2�0-1Ii2H _ OD: _
COUPLINGS: THR�Dj.Q___ FT
PIPE IN __ D_a __ FT LENGTHS
PIPE U _ FT
PIPE _._fit Z 5N0 _ FT
SCREEN _�5.0� �o_o _ FT
TOTAL: __22_53 FT
THICKNESS OF UPPER SEAL 2.0 FT
LENGTH OF SCREEN 15.0 FT
SAN D 17.0 FT
-- — — — — — _ I [BOTTOM OF BORING
R MARK : ALL MEASUREMENTS TO THE NEAREST 0.1 FT.
N=2 218.1284
E=3 106.6545
HOR Enolee k-a rfC
c_

J
PROJECT: MOORE COUNTY C&D LANDFILL PROJECT NO: 07625-001--018
LOCATION: HIGHWAY 5, ABERDEEN, NC BORING NUMBER: B-13D
PAGE: 1 Of 1
BORING LOG
DATE: 9/18/96
NUMBER
DEPTH
SPT
T
WL
SI
DESCRIPTION (USCS)
COMMENTS
4'
TAN, MAROON, WHITE, YELLOW AND BROWN,
SS-1
26
SS
MEDIUM -DENSE, MEDIUM TO COARSE -GRAINED
CLAYEY SAND (SC), MOTTLED, SLIGHTLY MOIST.
YELLOW, BROWN AND TAN, MEDIUM -DENSE,
8
SS-2
22
SS
'
MEDIUM TO COARSE -GRAINED SAND (SM)
WITH FINES, MOTTLED MAROON, IRON OXIDE
STAINING, WET
YELLOW, TAN, WHITE AND MAROON, MEDIUM -DENSE,
SS-3
1 6'
26
SS
MEDIUM TO COARSE -GRAINED SAND (SM),
FINES MIXED, WET
NO SAMPLE RECOVERED DUE TO HEAVING
SS-4
24
SS
SANDS
2 4'
2 8'
3 2'-
v AT
36'
DRILLING
-1-� 24 HR
BOREHOLE COMPLETION: 40 FEET BELOW LAND SURFACE
K Y:
SI - SCREEN
SS - SPUTSPDON
TEST-N NU BER"
WATER DEPTH: 9 9.3 FEET BELOW LAND SURFACE DATE: 9/19/96
ST - SHELBY TUBE
T - TYPE
wL - WATER LEVEL
DRILLING METHOD: 4 1/4-INCH HOLLOW STEM AUGERS
laq
� �
I
LOG�tD BY. J ISHAM

DEPTH
BELOW
GROUND
SURFACE
2 6. 0 FT
28.0 FT
30.0 FT
F7
an n
MONITORING WELL
INSTALLATION DIAGRAM
PROTECTIVE
PIPE HEIGHT
388.04 FT
2.39 FT
GROUT MIX:
PORTLANO TYPE I CEMENT
BENTONITE SEAL:
3/8-INCH BENTONITE PELLETS
IMPERVIOUS ZONE:
28.0 FT THICK
PERMEABLE ZONE:
12.0 FT THICK
MOORE COUNTY C&D LANDFILL
PEIZOMETER NO.: Mw-13D
BORING NO.: B-13D
JOB NO.: 07625-001-018
PREPARED BY: J. ISHAM
CHECKED BY:
DATE: _. _ 18/96
EL, 385.65 FT.
TOP OF GROUND
SURFACE
PROTECTIVE METAL CASING
4-INCH SQUARE BLACK STEEL
WELL BOX WITH LOCKING COVER
RISER PIPE: SCHEDULE __
40__
ASTM DESIGNATION:
ID: OD:—
COUPLINGS: THRFA Q
_ �FT
PIPE IN _ �_0FT. LENGTHS
PIPE — _-1��_39
Fl
PIPE .--NL3-) i o.o _
FT
SCREEN �1�_ 10.0
FT
TOTAL: --- 42.39 -- ---
F i i
THICKNESS
OF UPPER
SEAL
2.0 IT
LENGTH OF
SCREEN
10.0
FT
SAND 12.0 FT
BOTTOM OF BORING
NEAREST D.t FT.
N=2 207.4862
REMARK,._ ALL MEASUREMENTS TO THE
- -
E=3,108.5434
HDR Ercheerin% k,c.

J
DEPTH
BELOW
GROUND
SURFACE
0
1.0 FT
3.0 FT
5.0 FT
PROTECTIVE
PIPE HEIGHT
MONITORING WELL
INSTALLATION DIAGRAM
400.58 FT
2.70 FT
LROUT_MIX:
PORTLAND TYPE I CEMENT
QENTONITE SEAL:
3/8-INCH SENTONITE PELLETS
IMPERVIOUS ZONE:
3.0 Fr THICK
PERMEABLE ZONE:
17.0 Fr THICK
MOORE COUNTY C&D LANDFILL
PEIZOMETER NO: Mw-14
BORING NO,: B-14
JOB NO: 07625-001-018 {
PREPARED BY: J. 1SHAM
CHECKED BY:
DATE: _- 9/16/96
EL, 397.88 Fr.
TOPOF GROUND
SURFACE
PROTECTIVE MFFAL CASING
4-INCH SQUARE BLACK STEEL
WELL BOX WITH LOCKING COVER
RISER PIPE: SCHEDULE aQ_v
ASTM DESIGNATION:
ID: _��0 CINCH _ OD: _______
-
COUPLINGS: THREADfD—_
FT
PIPE IN 10_0 FT LENGTH '.
PIPE------� 2.7
F
PIPE _ _LL�5.0
FT
SCREEN _�Z S.OL��_ t4_4
FT �
TOTAL: ___-- 22,70 __--_—. F
THICKNESS OF UPPER SEAL 2.0 F
LENGTH OF SCREEN 15.0 FT
SAN D 17.0 FT
FT
20.0 FT — — — — — — — BOTTOM OF BORING
REMARKS: ALL MEASUREMENTS TO THE NEAREST 0.1 FT.
fDq N=2,694.2171
E=3,615.2164 T

PROJECT: MOORE COUNTY C&D LANDFILL PROJECT NO: 07625-001-018
LOCATION: HIGHWAY 5, ABERDEEN, NC BORING NUMBER: B-14
PAGE: 1 of 1
BORING LOG
DATE: 9/ 16/96
NUMBER
DEPTH
SPT
T
WL
SI
DESCRIPTION (USCS)
COMMENTS
4'
_
—
WHITE AND TAN, MOTTLED, DENSE, FINE—
GRAINED SAND (SW), WITH A TRACE OF
CLAY, SLIGHTLY MOIST, IRON OXIDE
VERY UNIFORM
TEXTURE
SS-1
46
SS
8'
—
STAINING.
—_
_
WHITE TO TAN, MEDIUM —DENSE, FINE TO
COARSE —GRAINED SAND (SM), MOTTLED
WITH MAROON SAND LENSES, IRON OXIDE
STAINING, SLIGHT CLAY CONTENT, VERY
SS-2
11
SS
_
—
MOIST TO WET.
DARK GRAY AND MAROON, MEDIUM —DENSE,
SS-3
1 6'
19
SS
=
COARSE TO VERY COARSE SAND (SC),
MIXED WITH DARK GRAY TO MAROON SANDY
—
CLAY LENSES, STIFF, FIRM, SL. PLASTICITY,
=
WET.
T.D. = 20 FEET
2 4'
28'
32'
AT
—� DRILLING
36'
�- 24 HR
40'
BOREHOLE COMPLETION: 20 FEET BELOW LAND SURFACE
Si - SCREEN
SS - SPLITSPOON
SPT - SOIL PENETRATIDN
TEST-N NUMBER
ST - SHELffY TUBE
T - TYPE
WL - WATER LEVEL
WATER DEPTH: 12.78 FEET BELOW LAND SURFACE DATE: 9/18/96
DRILLING METHOD: 4 1/4-INCH HOLLOW STEM AUGERS
LOGGED BY: J ISHAM

DEPTH PROTECTIVE
BELOW PIPE HEIGHT
GROUND
SURFACE
16.0 FT
18.0 FT
1 20.0 FT
MONITORING WELL
INSTALLATION DIAGRAM
431.10 FT
1.79 FT
GRQ„WT MIX:
PORTLAND TYPE I CEMENT
NT NITESEAL:
3/8—INCH BENTONME PELLETS
IMPERVIOUS ZONE:
18.0 FT THICK
PERMEABLE ZONE:
17.0 FT THICK
MOORE COUNTY LANDFILL
PEIZOMETER NO..: MW-15
BORING NO.: B-15
JOB NO.: 07625-001-018
PREPARED BY: J. rSHAM
CHECKED BY:
DATE: 9/ 19 /96
EL. 429.31 FT.
TOP OF GROUND
SURFACE
PROTECTIVE METAL CASIN
4—INCH SQUARE BLACK STEEL
WELL BOX WITH LOCKING COVER
RISER PIPE: SCHEDULE
ASTM DESIGNATION:
ID: _�_0 CINCH OD
COUPLINGS: __ THREADED __ FT
PIPE IN __ 10_0 _ FT.. LENGTHS
PIPE -___ .il),?_79 FT
PIPE FT
SCREEN _LZ 5�0`��10�0 FT
TOTAL: -- 36.79 . �__-- FT
THICKNESS OF UPPER SEAL 2-0 FT
LENGTH OF SCREEN 15.0 FT
SAND 17.0 FT
FT
35.0 FT
— — — — — -- — — BOTTOM OF BORING
REMARKS: ALL MEASUREMENTS TO THE NEAREST 0.1 FT.
N=3s234.5825 _
E=4 373.7788
Hari Ord), Ism,

PROJECT: MOORE COUNTY C&D LANDFILL PROJECT NO: 07625-001-018
LOCATION: HIGHWAY 5, ABERDEEN, NC BORING NUMBER: B-15
PAGE: 1 of 1
BORING LOG
DATE: 9/19/96
NUMBER
DEPTH
SPT
T
WL
SI
DESCRIPTION (USCS)
COMMENTS
4'
TAN AND REDDISH -BROWN, MEDIUM -DENSE,
SS-1
17
SS
MEDIUM TO COARSE —GRAINED SLIGHTLY
CLAYEY SAND (SC), NO PLASTICITY, STICKY,
8'
MOIST, MOTTLED.
WHITE, MEDIUM —DENSE, FINE—GRAINED SAND
VERY UNIFORM
SS-2
17
SS
(SW), WITH MINOR FINES, MIXED WITH DENSE
TEXTURE
SANDY CLAY LENSES. SL. PLASTICITY, DRY,
=
HORIZONTAL COLOR BANDING,
SAME AS ABOVE (SW), MEDIUM TO COARSE—
GRAINED, PINK/MAROON MOTTLING, FINES
MIXED, SLIGHTLY KAOLONITIC, V. MOIST,
WHITE, MAROON, BROWN, RED —ORANGE,
VERY UNIFORM
TEXTURE
SS-3
1 6'
19
SS
SS-4
22
SS
_
MEDIUM —DENSE, MEDIUM TO COARSE —GRAINED
=
CLAYEY SAND (SC), KAOLINITIC ZONES, WET.
24'
_
—
-------�
WHITE AND PINK, MEDIUM —DENSE, MEDIUM TO
SS-5
26
SS
=
COARSE —GRAINED SAND (SM) MIXED WITH
28'
=
GRAY/WHITE CLAY LAYERS (KAOLINITIC/STICKY),
_
—
—
SLIGHTLY MOIST, HORIZONTAL MOTTLING
SAME AS ABOVE (SM), MEDIUM TO COARSE—
GRAINED, WET.
LANDFILL
GAS
SS-6
'
22
SS
=
ODOR
SS-7
36`
18
SS
T D = .35 FEET
� AT
— DRILLING
40'
BOREHOLE COMPLETION: 35 FEET BELOW LAND SURFACE
SI - SCREEN
SS - SPUTSPOON
SPT - SOIL' PENETRATION
TEST-N NUMBER
ST - SHELBY TUBE
T - TYPE
WL - WATER LEVEL
WATER DEPTH: 30 FEET BELOW LAND SURFACE DATE: 9/19/96
DRILLING METHOD: 4 1/4-INCH HOLLOW STEM AUGERS
Imi
LOGGED BY: J ISHAM

Project No: 07625-005-018
Project: Ground -Water Assessment Addendum
Client: Moore County
Location: Moore County Landfill Aberdeen, NC
Geologist Log SP-8/PZ-8
Ground Elevation: 372 60 MSL
Geologist: C Randazzo
SUBSURFACE PROFILE
SAMPLE
Shear Strength
`4
Remarks
w
m
L
0
Description
U
blows/ft
`4
n
O
Z
m
20 40 80 80
cn
3.1
-3
3757
..2
-1
Ground Surface
0
17:;
2
31
I
;
4
I
5-El
I
6
7
8
10
11�
i
12
Portland Type
i
l Cement
13 i
SAND AND CLAY
14]
Interval not sampled j
15 '
j
I
9
17
19
�
f
I
21
22
23 y
I
I
i
i
25 —
t
\
Drilled by: Graham 8 Cur a HDR Engineering, Inc o the Carolinas Hole Size: 8 inches C
Currie f th
128 S Tryon Street
Drill Method: 4 25-inch ID HSA Suite 1400 Top -of -Casing: 375 70 MSL.
Charlotte, NC 28202
Drill Date: November 20 2000 Sheet: 1 of 2

Project No: 07625-005-018
Project: Ground -Water Assessment Addendum
Client: Moore County
Location: Moore County Landfill, Aberdeen, NC
Drilled by: Graham & Currie
Drill Method: 4 25-inch ID HSA
Drill Date: November 20 2000
Geologist Log SP-81PZ-8
Ground Elevation: 372.60' MSL
Geologist: C. Randazzo
HDR Engineering Inc of the Carolinas
128 S Tryon Street
Suite 1400
Charlotte NC. 28202
Hole Size: 8 inches
Top -of -Casing: 375 70 MSL
Sheet: 2 of 2

Project No: 07625••005-018
Project: Ground -.Water Assessment Addendum
Client: Moore County
Location: Moore County Landfill Aberdeen, NC
Geologist Log SP-12SIPZ-12S
Ground Elevation: 358.80' MSL
Geologist: C Randazzo
SUBSURFACE PROFILE I
SAMPLE
Shear Strength
2
Remarks
w
m
r
0
Description
a
E
m
0
blowslft
0
Z
CL
FO
¢
20 40 60 80CD
to
om
3.3
3
621
_.. -
-2
-1
Ground Surface
0
Portland Type
I Cement
2
i
3
e ,
W8••inch
•'^
Bentonite Chips
4
• �.,
#2 Silica Sand
5
•.
SILTY SAND (SM)
01
•
Interval not sampled
6
'.•
I
2-inch Diameter
•
._
I SCH 40 PVC
8
��
'
:
i 0 010•-'inch Slots
.•e
i
i
i
9
••�•'•
i
:l
10
I
10
?
348.8
i
End of Borehole
;
I
i
11
E
!
1
!
12
13�
14--i
I
!
16]
I
I
Drilled by: Graham & Currie HDR Engineering Inc of the Carolinas Hole Size: 8 inches
128 S Tryon Street
Drill Method: 4 25-inch ID HSA Suite 1400 Top of -Casing: 362 10 MSL
Charlotte NC. 28202
Drill Date: November 8. 2000 Sheet: 1 of 1

Project No: 07625-005-018
Project: Ground -Water Assessment Addendum
Client: Moore County
Location: Moore County Landfill, Aberdeen NC
Geologist Log SP-12D/PZ-12D
Ground Elevation: 359.60' MSL
Geologist: C Randazzo
SUBSURFACE PROFILE
I SAMPLE
Shear Strength
1°
Remarks
i
m
w
Z'
o
Description
m
i
p
m
a
o
m
20 40 60 80
m
o
rA
❑
z
r
a:
3.3
-3
1362.9
— -
-2
-1
0
Ground Surface
4—t.
5
••
6
.
8�:
9
•'
I �
�
I
10
.•s
I
Portland Type
I Cement
12'•'.;�j
13�
1 q
SILTY SAND (SM)
�..'
Interval not sampled. see
j
15��
• •.:.'
adjacent soil boring log for !
MW-2 for details
i
16
I
Drilled by: Graham & Currie HDR Engineering, Inc of the Carolinas Hole Size: 8 inches
128 S Tryon Street
Drill Method: 4.25-inch ID HSA Suite 1400 Top -of -Casing: 362 90MSL
Charlotte, NC 28202
Drill Date: November 8 2000 Sheet: 1 of 3

Project No: 07625-005• 01 B
Project: Ground. -Water Assessment Addendum
Client: Moore County
Location: Moore County Landfill, Aberdeen, NC
Geologist Log SP-12DIPZ--12D
Ground Elevation: 359 60' MSL
Geologist: C Randazzo
SUBSURFACE PROFILE
SAMPLE
Shear Strength
i° Remarks
w
`D
a
o
�
Description
E
m
>
0
blowslft
O
cn
❑m
Z
�
m
Im
20 40 60 80
17
�•
•
18
19
;
20
21
••e
':.
01
23
24
•;
25
;•
26
27a�
.�
28
29
29e;.°
------------------ '—
SILTY CLAY (CL) i 330 61 !
Portland Type
I
30
_.
,�' :'°
Gray and white coarse to 02 I
99 I
i
I Cement
--
fine-grained quartz sand
31
--•
o—°
mixed very stiff wet.
IIr
32 �•
•
e -•
�
�
�
i
33
341
_•
34
CLAY (CL) 13256
=: -
Gray. more brittle than E 03
99
above little silt and fine
_
i
sand, very stiff
36
—_
Drilled by: Graham & Currie HDR Engineering, Inc of the Carolinas Role Size: 8 inches
128 S Tryon Street
Drill Method: 4.25-inch ID HSA Suite 1400 Top. -of -Casing: 362 90 MSL
Charlotte, NC 28202
Drill Date: November 8 2000 Sheet: 2 of 3

Project No: 07625••005-018
Geologist Log SP-12DIPZ-12D
Project: Ground -Water Assessment Addendum
Client: Moore County Ground Elevation: 359 60' MSL f DIA
Location: Moore County Landfill. Aberdeen, NC Geologist: C Randazzo
SUBSURFACE PROFILE
SAMPLE
Shear Strength
R
Remarks
i
m
ua
z
a
o
E
Description
n
m
E
3
i
blows/ft
O
_.
O
cn
O
Z
CL
m
¢
20 4D 6D 8D
37
38
39
39
L :
SILTY CLAY (CL)
3206.
Gray and white. zones of red
04
35
clay with coarse sand and
I
3!&inch
41
—•
pebbles
Bentonite Chips
42—
"
°
0 .I
#2 Silica Sand
43
w A
°
6
45�
°-`
05
43
46
,a
0 -
2-inch Diameter
_
SCH 40 PVC
47
E
D 010-inch Slots
48
o •
•
49
50
o�• '
as
99
J
�--
-�-
. •
`'_
51
51
End of Borehole
3086 !
52
53
54
i
y
55-1
I
56
1
Drilled by: Graham & Currie HDR Engineering, Inc of the Carolinas Hole Size: 8 inches
128 S Tryon Street
Drill Method: 4 25••inch ID HSA Suite 1400 Top -of -Casing: 362 90' MSL
Charlotte, NC 28202
Drill Date: November 8 2000 Sheet: 3 of 3

Project No: 07625-005-018
Geologist Log SP-14SIPZ-14S
Project: Ground -Water Assessment Addendum
Client: Moore County Ground Elevation: 373.20' MSL DIA
Location: Moore County Landfill, Aberdeen NC Geologist: C Randazzo
Unlied by: Graham & Uurne
Drill Method: 4.25-inch ID HSA
Drill Date: November 13 2000
HUH Engineering Inc of the Uarounas
128 S Tryon Street
Suite 1400
Charlotte, NC 28202
nure oue. o inures
Top -of -Casing: 376 70 MSL
Sheet: 1 of 1

Project No: 07625--005-01 e
Geologist Log SP-14DIPZ-14D
Project: Ground -Water Assessment Addendum
D1Jk
Client: Moore County Ground Elevation: 373 10' MSL
Location: Moore County Landfill, Aberdeen, NC. Geologist: C Randazzo
SUBSURFACE PROFILE
SAMPLE
Shear Strength
i°
cc
Remarks
m
w
Z
Descri Lion
p
i
E
a
=CD
3
blowsJft
o
E
�
rs
Z
F
m
L°,
�
20 40 60 80
3
3.7
i
376.8
-3
-1
0
Ground Surface
1
�2-
a :
4
5
6
7
8
9
10�
j
PoI Cementpe
i
12-
i
13
14
15�
E
i
I
1
16�
17�
I
18,
i i
19
SAND AND CLAY
i
Interval not sampled
20
I
1
21
1
22
23
'
24
I
Drilled by: Graham & Currie HDR Engineering Inc. of the Carolinas Hole Size: 8 inches
128 S Tryon Street
Drill Method: 4 25-inch ID HSA Suite 1400 Top -of -Casing: 376 80MSL
Charlotte NC 28202
Drill Date: November 13 2000 Sheet: 1 of 2

Project No: 07625-005..01 B
Geologist Log SP-14DIPZ--14D
Project: Ground. -Water Assessment Addendum
Client: Moore County Ground Elevation: 373 10 MSL IDIA
Location: Moore County Landfill, Aberdeen, NC Geologist: C Randazzo
Dnlled by: Graham & Gurne
Drill Method: 4.25-inch ID HSA
Drill Date: November 13 2000
HDR Engineering, Inc of the Carolinas
12B S Tryon Street
Suite 1400
Charlotte, NC 28202
mole oize: a incnes
Top -of -Casing: 376.80 MSL
Sheet: 2 of 2

Uj
z
Q
w
i
w
of
0
0
S
in
N 0
C�k
Ln
0
Ln
0
.n
0
Ln
0
N
l®rA64t.
HDR Engineering, Inc,
of the Carolinas
Suite 140C
128 S. Tryon Street
Choriotte, NC 28202-5001
[phone]
4" DIA,. SQUARE
STEEL PROTECTIVE COVER
WITH I.D. AND LOCKABLE
LID CEMENTED IN GROUND
PVC CAP (NO GLUE)
1 " DIA SCH 40 PVC PIPE
CONCRETE
EXISTING
GROUND
CEMENT
GROUT SEAL
BENTONITE SEAL
3/8—INCH PELLETS
ALL JOINTS FLUSH
THREADED (NO GLUE)
#2 WASHED COARSE
SILICA SAND
I" DIA SCH 40 PVC PIPE
0.02" SLOTTED SCREEN
1 " DIA PVC CAP
0
2
NO SCALE MM-9 I
MOORE COUNTY
3/00
SANITARY LANDFILL
METHANE MONITORING Figure
PROBE DETAIL

Ln
C'4 p
N
Ln
0
Un
0
Ln
N
HDR Engineering, Inc
of the Carolinas
Suite 1400
128 S. Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-5001
[phone]
4" DIA. SQUARE
STEEL PROTECTIVE COVER
WITH I.D. AND LOCKABLE
LID CEMENTED IN GROUND
4 40a D, 1 1' °`e
�n
0
2"
PVC CAP (NO GLUE)
I" DIA„ SCH 40 PVC PIPE
CONCRETE
EXISTING
GROUND
CEMENT
GROUT SEAL
BENTONITE SEAL
3/8—iNCH PELLETS
ALL ,JOINTS FLUSH
THREADED (NO GLUE)
#2 WASHED COARSE
SILICA SAND
1 " DIA, SCH 40 PVC PIPE
0.02" SLOTTED SCREEN
1 " DIA. PVC CAP
NO SCALE M M —1 0
MOORE COUNTY Date
SANITARY LANDFILL .3/00
METHANE MONITORING Figure
PROBE DETAIL

Un
N
O
N
to
0
�n
O
�n
1CD
cD U-)
Im
HDR Engineering, Inc,
of the Carormas
Suite 1400
128 S. Tryon Street
Cho rlotte, NC 28202-5001
(7na1 .i.3R-1ROD
4" DIA.. SQUARE
STEEL PROTECTIVE COVER
WITH I.D. AND LOCKABLE
LID CEMENTED IN GROUND
PVC CAP (NO GLUE)
1 " DIA. SCH 40 PVC PIPE
CONCRETE
°O D
EXISTING
GROUND
CEMENT
GROUT SEAL
BENTONITE SEAL
3/8--INCH PELLETS
I
ALL JOINTS FLUSH
THREADED (NO GLUE)
#2 WASHED COARSE
SILICA SAND
— 1 " DIA. SCH 40 PVC PIPE
0 02" SLOTTED SCREEN
�n
O
2"
1 " DIA PVC CAP
NO SCALE M M —13
GORE COUNTY Date
M 3/00
SANITARY LANDFILL
METHANE MONITORING Figure
PROBE DETAIL
d

4" DIA SQUARE
STEEL PROTECTIVE COVER
WITH I.D. AND LOCKABLE
LID CEMENTED IN GROUND
L
t�i 0
N
U-) p m G m
6 6
Un
0
Oo 00
Ln
0
II
II
If
0
U'
I I I
II
I
it
Ill
I 'r
U?4,
HDR Engineering, Inc,
of the Carolinas
Suite 1400
128 S. Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-5001
[phone]
Ln
0
2„
PVC CAP (NO CLUE)
1 " DIA. SCH 40 PVC PIPE
CONCRETE
EXISTING
GROUND
CEMENT
GROUT SEAL
BENTONITE SEAL
3/8—INCH PELLETS
ALL JOINTS FLUSH
THREADED (NO GLUE)
#2 WASHED COARSE
SILICA SAND
1" DIA SCH 40 PVC PIPE
0 02" SLOTTED SCREEN
1 " D IA. PVC CAP
NO SCALE MM--14
MOORE COUNTY Date
SANITARY LANDFILL 3/00
METHANE MONITORING Figure
PROBE DETAIL

d
in
c� O
N
Ln
a
Ln
a
Ln
a
I 'r "r
i)Ll
HDR Engineering, Inc
of the Cara%as
Suite 3 400
128
1 Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-5001
[phone]
4" DIA,. SQUARE
STEEL PROTECTIVE COVER
WITH I.D. AND LOCKABLE
LID CEMENTED IN GROUND
PVC CAP (NO GLUE)
3 " DIA. SCH 40 PVC PIPE
CONCRETE
°e D
EXISTING
GROUND
CEMENT
GROUT SEAL
BENTONITE SEAL
3/8-INCH PELLETS
ALL JOINTS FLUSH
THREADED (NO GLUE)
Un
0
2"
#2 WASHED COARSE
SILICA SAND
i " ,DIA. SCH 40 PVC PIPE
0.02" SLOTTED SCREEN
1 " DIA. PVC CAP
NO SCALE M M —1 5
MOORE COUNTY °°te
SANITARY LANDFILL 3/00
METHANE MONITORING Figure
PROBE DETAIL i

Ln
N Q
N
Ln
0
Ln
CD
0
0
Ln CD
hJ1(
HDR Engineering, Inc.
of the Carolinas
Suite 1400
128 S. Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-5001
(704) 338--1800
D
a
2"
4" DIA.. SQUARE
STEEL PROTECTIVE COVER
WITH I.D. AND LOCKABLE
LID CEMENTED IN GROUND
PVC CAP (NO GLUE)
I" DIA SCH 40 PVC PIPE
CONCRETE
°p D
EXISTING
GROUND
CEMENT
GROUT SEAL
BENTONITE SEAL
.3/8—INCH PELLETS
Ln
0
ALL JOINTS FLUSH
THREADED (NO GLUE)
#2 WASHED COARSE
SILICA SAND
1 " DIA. SCH 40 PVC PIPE
0.02" SLOTTED SCREEN
1 " DIA. PVC CAP
NO SCALE
MOORE COUNTY
SANITARY LANDFILL
METHANE MONITORING
PROBE DETAIL
MM- 1 6
Date
3/00
Figure

fait
HDR Engineering, Inc.
of the Carofmas
Suite 1400
128 S. Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-5001
(704) 338-ISCO
4" DIA. SQUARE
STEEL PROTECTIVE COVER
WITH I.D. AND LOCKABLE
LID CEMENTED IN GROUND
6pe D I I e �n
�n
0
2"
PVC CAP (NO GLUE)
1 " DIA. SCH 40 PVC PIPE
CONCRETE
EXISTING
GROUND
CEMENT
GROUT SEAL
BENTONITE SEAL
.3/8-INCH PELLETS
ALL JOINTS FLUSH
THREADED (NO GLUE)
#2 WASHED COARSE
SILICA SAND
1 " DIA. SCH 40 PVC PIPE
0.02" SLOTTED SCREEN
1 " DIA PVC CAP
NO SCALE MM-17
MOORE COUNTY °°t`
3/00
SANITARY LANDFILL
METHANE MONITORING Fiqure
PROBE DETAIL

RECORD OF BOREHOLE GP-10R SHEET 1of 1
PROJECT: Moore County LF DRILL RIG: Diedrich D-50 NORTHING: 1,855,952.87
PROJECT NUMBER: 19133605 DATE STARTED: 6/25/20 EASTING: 508,889.16
DRILLED DEPTH: 15.00 ft DATE COMPLETED: 6/25120 GS ELEVATION: 431.90
LOCATION: Aberdeen, NC TOC ELEVATION: 434.21 ft
SOIL PROFILE
SAMPLES
z
v
ELEV.
O
z
w
O
PIEZOMETER
PIEZOMETER
w
v
a O
W
Lu
BLOWS
O
DIAGRAM and NOTES
CONSTRUCTION
p
w
DESCRIPTION
O
J
J
EL
per 6 in
;
w
DETAILS
W
p
DEPTH
C')
N
140lb hammer
Z
30 inch drop
0
0.00 - 2.00
k8
WELL CASING
SM, Silty SAND, fine to medium, tan light
SM
1
m
1-1-2-2
3
Portland -
Interval: 0' - 5'
brown, cohesive, W<PL, soft
rn
Type I
Material: Schedule 40 PVC
430
429.9
Diameter: 2"
2.00 - 4.00
2.00
]2.00
Joint Type: Threaded
CL, Silty CLAY, some course sand, light
3/8"brown,
medium plasticity, cohesive, W<PL
CL
2
a)
2-3-2-2
5
Bentonite-
WELL SCREEN
427.9
Pellets
Interval: 5'-15'
4.00 - 6.00
Material: Schedule 40 PVC
4.00
5
CL, Silty CLAY, medium silty sand at 5.0',
CL
3
3-1-1-2
2
1.50
Riser-
Diameter: 2
Slot Size: 0.010"
tan, cohesive, W<PL, soft
(n
2 00
End Cap:
425.9
6.00 - 8.00
6.00
FILTER PACK
425
SM, Silty SAND, some clay, light tan and
1.75
Interval: 4'-15'
white, non -cohesive, loose, W<PL, dry
SM
4
(n
3-2-2-2
4
2.00
Type: #2 Filter Sand
423.9
FILTER PACK SEAL
8.00 - 10.00
8.00
SP, SAND, medium to coarse, tan and
SP
5
N
4-5-7-6
12
1.50
#2 Filter
Interval: 2'-4'
Type: 3/8" Bentonite Pellets
white, non -cohesive, loose, dry
(n
2.00
Sand
10
421.9
ANNULUS SEAL
10.00
10.00 - 12.00
Interval: 0' - 2'
SP, SAND, medium to coarse, trace clay,
1.75
0.010"
Type: Portland Type I
tan and white, non -cohesive, loose, dry
SP
6
(n
7-7-8-9
15
2 00
Slotted -
420
419.9
Screen
WELL COMPLETION
12.00 - 14.00
12.00
Pad: Tx Tx 0.5'
SP, SAND, medium to coarse, trace clay,
rn
2.00
Protective Casing: Aluminum
tan and white, non -cohesive, loose, moist
SP
7
�
7-7-8-9
15
2.00
417 9
DRILLING METHODS
Soil Drill: 4.25 inch HSA
14.00
14.00 - 16.00
Rock Drill: N/A
SP, SAND,medium to coarse, some clay,
2.00
15
white, cohesive, cohesive, loose, soft, moist
SP
8
m
5-7-7-9
15
2.00
415.9
Boring completed at 15.00 ft
16.00
415
20
410
25
405
30
400
35
395
40
LOG SCALE: 1 in = 5 ft GA INSPECTOR: Darren Cox
DRILLING COMPANY: Geologic Exploration CHECKED BY:
DRILLER: Jacob Messick DATE: G O L D E a

WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
This farm can be used for single or multiple wells
1. Well Contractor Information:
JACOB MESSICK
Well Contractor Name.
A - 42S2
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit#:
List all applicable well construction permits (i.e. County, State, Variance, etc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
❑Agricultural
❑Municipal/Public
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
El Residential Water Supply (single)
❑Industrial/Commercial
UResidential Water Supply (shared)
❑ Irrigat Lon
Non -Water Supply Well:
OMonitoring
❑Recovery
Injection Well:
❑Aquifer Recharge
❑Groundwater Remediation
❑Aquifer Storage and Recovery
❑Salinity Barrier
❑Aquifer Test
❑Stormwater Drainage
[]Experimental Technology
©Subsidence Control
❑Geothermal (Closed Loop)
❑Tracer
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Return)
❑Other (explain under #21 Remarks)
06/26/20
M W-19
4. Date Well(s) Completed:
Well ID#
52. Well Location:
MOORE COUNTY LANDFILL
FacdayfOwner Name
Facility ID# (if applicable)
456 TURNING LEAF WAY ABERDEEN 28315
Physical Address, City, and Zip
MOORE
County
Parcel Identification No, (PIN)
For Internal Use ONLY:
14. NVATER ZONES
FROM
TO DESCRIPTION
ft.
ft.
ft,
ft.
15. OUTER CASING for multi -cased wells OR LINER if a livable.
FROM TO
DIAMETER
THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft.
16. INNER CAStNG OR TUBING l2eothermal closed -loop)
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
0.0 ft•
50 ft.
2.0 a].
SCH 40
PVC
ft.
ft.
in.
17. SCREEN
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
SLOTSIZE
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
5.0 ft,
13.0 ft•
2.0 in.
.010
SCH 40
PVC
ft.
ft.
18. GROUT
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT
0_0 fl'
20 ft'
PJRTIANDBENTONTE
SLURRY
It.
ft.
ft.
ft.
19.SAND/GRAVEL PACK ifa. livable
FROM
T TO
I MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD
4.0 ft-
13.0 ft'
20-40
FINE SILICA SAND
ft.
ft.
20. DRILLING LOG attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM
TO
DESCRIPTION cola,, hardness, suillmck tv e, sin sim, err-)
0.0 ft.
13.0 ft-
TAN SILTY SAND
fT_
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft,
ft.
ft.
ft.
rt.
ft.
ft,
ft.
21. REMARKS
13ENTONITE SEAL FROM 2.0 TO 4.0 FEET
5b. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees: 22. Certification-
(ifwell field, one Iatllvrng is sufficient}
35" 08' 51,22" N 790 2$" 52,67" W
6. Is (are) the we4(s): ram]' Permanent or ❑Temporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: ❑Yes or ©No
IJ7hiv is arepair, filt out known irexi construction itjornlation and explain the nature ofthe
repair antler h21 remarks section or an the back of this harm.
S. Number of wells constructed. 1
For nmhiple injection or non-Ivater supply ,velis ONLY lruh the same construction, you can
.submit nne form.
9. Total well depth below land surface: 13.0
bue muhlple ,,ells list all depths it different (example- 3Q200 ` and 2 rc 100')
14. Static writer level below to of casing: 8.0 irtl
IJlratcr level is above caving, use "+ "
11. Borebole diameter: R'Q (in.)
AUGER
12. Well construction method: _
(i.eauger, rotary, cable, driect puslr, etc.)
Signnmre ofCertiCed Well Con1-t-
07/08/20
Ny signing thu.1orni. I hereby certify shot the ivell(s) ivas (were) construcled in accordance
lvilh 15A NC AC 02C _0100 or 15A NCAC 02C-0200 Well Construction Sfandordv and thal a
copy of this record hav been provided to the well onrner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
construction details. You may also attach additional pages ifnecessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTUCTIONS
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Quality, information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Infection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 241
above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Quality, Underground Injection Control Program,
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test: 24c, For Witter Supply & Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to
the address(es) above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of
13b, Disinfection type: Amount: completion of well construction to the county health department of the county
where constructed.
Form G W-1 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality Revised Jan. 2013

RECORD OF BOREHOLE GP-19 SHEET 1of 1
PROJECT: Moore County LF DRILL RIG: Diedrich D-50 NORTHING: 1,853,794.49
PROJECT NUMBER: 19133605 DATE STARTED: 6/25/20 EASTING: 510,494.25
DRILLED DEPTH: 10.00 ft DATE COMPLETED: 6/25120 GS ELEVATION: 397.08
LOCATION: Aberdeen, NC TOC ELEVATION: 399.33 ft
SOIL PROFILE
SAMPLES
z
v
ELEV.
O
z
w
O
PIEZOMETER
PIEZOMETER
w
v
a O
W
Lu
BLOWS
O
DIAGRAM and NOTES
CONSTRUCTION
p
w
DESCRIPTION
O
J
J
EL
per 6 in
;
w
DETAILS
W
p
DEPTH
C')
N
140lb hammer
Z
30 inch drop
0
0.00 - 2.00
WELL CASING
SM, Silty SAND, medium to fine sand,
SM
1
m
1-1-1-2
2
1.75
Portland _
Interval: 0' - 5'
brown, non -cohesive, loose, dry
2.00
Type I
Material: Shedule 40 PVC
395.08
Diameter: 2"
395
Joint Type: Threaded
2.00 - 4.00
2.00
MH, Clayey SILT, medium plasticity, tan
U)
2 00
3/8"
brown, cohesive, W<PL, soft
MH
2
a)
3-3-5-4
8
2 00
Bentonite-
WELL SCREEN
393.08
Pellets
Interval: 5'- 10'
4.00 - 6.00
Material: Schedule 40 PVC
4.00
5
MH, Clayey SILT, medium plasticity, tan
MH
3
7-6-5-5
11
2.00
Riser-
Diameter: 2"
Slot Size: 0.010"
brown, cohesive, W<PL, firm
(n
2.00
End Cap:
391.08
6.00 - 8.00
6.00
FILTER PACK
SM, Silty SAND, silty sandy with some clay,
�
2.00
Interval: 4' - 10'
390
medium to fine sand, tan orange,
SM
4
7-5-5-5
10
2.00
#2 Filter
Type: #2 Filter Sand
non -cohesive to cohesive, W-PL, soft
389.08
Sand
0.010"
FILTER PACK SEAL
8.00 - 10.00
8.00
SC, Clayey SAND, clayey sand with some
N
1.75
Slotted
Interval: 2'- 4'
silt, coarse to medium sand, tan -white,
SC
5
(n
4-3-5-3
8
2 00
Screen
Type: 3/8" Bentonite Pellets
10
non -cohesive, wet at 10', loose
387.08
ANNULUS SEAL
10.00 - 12.00
10.00
Interval: 0' - 2'
SP, SAND, coarse to medium sand,
2.00
Type: Portland Cement
tan -white, wet, loose
SIP
6
3-3 4-5
7
2.00
385.08
WELL COMPLETION
385
Pad: Tx Tx 0.5'
Boring completed at 10.00 It
12.00
Protective Casing: Aluminum
DRILLING METHODS
Soil Drill: 4.25 inch HSA
Rock Drill: N/A
15
380
20
375
25
370
30
365
35
360
40
LOG SCALE: 1 in = 5 ft GA INSPECTOR: Darren Cox
DRILLING COMPANY: Geologic Exploration CHECKED BY:
DRILLER: Jacob Messick DATE: G O L D E a

12. Well construction method: _
(he_ auger, rotarv, cable, direct push, etc.)
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
This form can be used for single or multiple wells
1, Well Contractor Information:
JACOB MESSICK
Well Contractor Name
A - 4252
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit#:
List all applicable well rans?ruclion permits 0e_ County, Siam, rarionce, ere.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
vrarer�uppty wen:
❑Agricultural
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
❑industrial/Commerciat
Non -Water Supply Well:
LZMonitoring
❑Municipal/Public
❑Residential Water Supply (single)
❑Residential Water Supply (shared)
❑ Aq Infer Recharge ❑ Groundwater Remediation
❑Aquifer Storage and Recovery ❑Salinity .Barrier
❑Aquifer Test ❑Stormwater Drainage
❑Experimental Technology ❑Subsidence Control
❑Geothermal (Closed Loop) ❑Tracer
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Return) ❑Other (explain under 921 P
4. Date Well(s) Completed: 06/26/20 Well ID# GP-19
5a. Well Location:
MOORE COUNTY LANDFILL
Facility/Owner Name Facility 16# (if applicable)
456 TURNING LEAF WAY ABERDEEN 28315
Physical Address, City, and Zip
MOORE
Comity
Parcel Mend fication No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(irwen field, one lat/long is sulrcientl
35' 08' 51.22" N 790 28' 52.67" W
6. 1s (are) the well(s): APermanent or ❑Temporary
7. is this a repair to an existing well: ❑Yes or ONo
If ilya Is a repair, fail ant knoll"? teen construction tnformotian and explain the nature of the
repair under x21 renrurkv section or on the back ofthis fornn.
S. Number Of wells constructed: 1
For mnhiple inleclion ar non -water supply wells ONLY ,rich the same construction. you can
sahn?ir one. farm.
9. Total well depth below land surface: 10•0
P )r multiple wells list at/ depths lJ'di -mnl (example- 3 r@200' and 2 i? 100')
10. Static water level below top of casing:
IJ sraler lerel is obare caning, use ", -
11. Borehole diameter: 80 (in.)
AUGER
ruternal Use IJNLY:
14. WATER ZONES
FROM TO
DESCRIPTION
fit. fit.
fit.
15. OUTER CASING for multi -eased wells OR LINER if a licable
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
TH1C87V,ss MATERIAL
rr,
fit,
in.
16. INNER CASING OR TUBING I Penthe-I closed -too
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
TInC10VE55
MATERIAL
0.0 fit'
5.0 ft.
2.0 in,
SCH 40
PVC
ft.
ft.
in
17. SCREEN
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
SLOTSIZE
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
5.0 ft'
10.0 fit•
2.0 'n'
.010
SCH 40
PVC
ft.
ft.
in.
18. GROUT
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD& AMOINT
0.0 ft.
ft'
2.0
PCR7L4NE19EWON7
SLURRY
ft.
ft.
ft,
ft.
19, SANDIGRAYEL PACK: if a licable
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD
4.0 fit.
10.0 ft.
20-40
FINE SILICA SAND
ft.
ft.
20. DR)LLtNG LOG (attach additional sheers lrnecessa
FROM
TO
DESCRIPTION 4colar, hardness, suil/mck e, grain size, etc.)
0.0 ft.
10 © ft.
TAN/BROWN SANDY SILT
re,
ft.
ft.
fr.
ft.
fit
ft.
ft
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
21. REMARKS
BENTONIfE SEAL FROM 2.0 TO4.0 FEET
22. Certification:
� 07/08/20
Signature of Certified We11 Contactor Dale
fay signing flus form, I herebv certify that the weH(s) teas (were) consrrucled in accordance
inhh 15A NCAC 02C . 0100 or 15A MAC 02C.' . 0200 Wall Conximcoon 5•tunelards turd thar a
copv of 1lds record has been provided to the srell owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional Weil site details or Weil
construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTUCTIONS
(ft.) 24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following-
(ft-) Division of Water Quality, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For ln•ection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24a
above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the fallowing -
Division of Water Quality, Underground Injection Control Program,
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test: 24c. For Water Sueply & Injection Wells. In addition to sending the form to
the address(es) above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of
131r. Disinfection type: Amount: completion of well construction to the county health department of the county
where constructed.
Form OW-1, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources -Division of Waier Quality Revised Jan, 2013

Cal
vi
0
O
Z
z
X
O
m
0
0
0
0
N
RECORD OF BOREHOLE MW-13DR SHEET 1of 1
PROJECT: Moore County LF DRILL RIG: Diedrich D-50 NORTHING: 1,853,156.68
PROJECT NUMBER: 19133605 DATE STARTED: 6/24/20 EASTING: 509,541.34
DRILLED DEPTH: 40.00 ft DATE COMPLETED: 6/24/20 GS ELEVATION: 383.31
LOCATION: Aberdeen, NC TOC ELEVATION: 385.99 ft
SOIL PROFILE
SAMPLES
z
v
ELEV.
O
z
w
O
PIEZOMETER
PIEZOMETER
w
v
a O
W
La
BLOWS
O
DIAGRAM and NOTES
CONSTRUCTION
p
w
DESCRIPTION
O
J
EL
per 6 in
;
w
DETAILS
uJ
p
D H
C')
fin)
N
140lb hammer
ZZ
30 inch drop
0
0.00 - 2.00
g'°
WELL CASING
SILT, tan brown, slightly plastic,
ClayL,
MH
1
5-6-5-4
11
20
Interval: 0'- 30'
1MH,
soft
2.00
Material: Schedule 40 PVC
381.31
Diameter: 2"
°3
Joint Type: Threaded
2.00 - 6.00
2.00
SM, Silty SAND, fine sand, light tan brown,
1.50
380
cohesive, W-PL, loose
2
a)
3-2-2-2
4
2.00
{°
WELL SCREEN
Interval: 30'-40'
SM
w
^^
Material: Schedule 40 PVC
Diameter:2"
5
3
5-4-3-4
7
1Q0
Riser-
__
°g
Slot Size: 0.010"
2.00
End Cap:
377.31
Me
a
FILTER PACK
6.00 - 8.00
6.00
CL, Silty CLAY, silty clay with sand, coarse
w
1.75°n
Interval: 28'-40'
sand, tan orange, cohesive, W-PL, soft
CL
4
4-3-3-3
6
2.00
9.
Type: #2 Filter Sand
375
375.31
°
dg
FILTER PACK SEAL
8.00 - 9.00
8.00ge
CL, Silty CLAY, silty with sand, coarse sand,
CL
374.31
(n
r e
Interval: 25'-28'
Type: 3/8" Bentonite Pellets
brown, cohesive, W>PL
9.00
5
7-6-6-7
12
2 00
°H,
10
SP
373.31
`g.
a
ANNULUS SEAL
9.00 -10.00
10.00
SP, SAND, coarse sand, tan, loose
ooa°
>a°
Interval: 0'- 25'
10.00 - 14.00
2.00
ie
eSS
Type: Portland Type I
SP, SAND, coarse sand, tan, non -cohesive,
6
(n
5-5 4 4
9
2.00
g`
loose, wet
rM.
WELL COMPLETION
SP
Portland
°8
Pad: 3' x 3' x 0.5'
2.00
_
Type I
Protective Casing: Aluminum
370
7
�
4-4-4-4
8
2.00
>?`
369.31
9°"
DRILLING METHODS
Soil Drill: 4.25 inch HSA
14.00°
14.00 - 16.00
>000
Rock Drill: N/A
SP SAND, flowing sand, wet
15
SP
8
z
1-3-3-5
6
200
°R:
367.31
16.00 - 18.00
16.00
SP, SAND, coarse sand, some red mottling,
�
2.00
non -cohesive, loose, wet
SP
9
m
5-7-7-8
14
2.00
365.31
ae
365
18.00 - 20.00
18.00
SP, SAND, coarse sand, tan, some
red -orange mottling at 19', non -cohesive,
SP
10
3-6-7-10
13
2.00
loose, wet
363.31
=08
20
20.00 - 24.00
20.00
SP, SAND, coarse sand, reddish tan, some
2.00
red -orange mottling, non -cohesive, loose,
11
5-9-13-14
22
2.00
wet
SP
ull
1,
360
12
y
9-7-7-8
14
2.00
2.00
0R
gee
'g
359.31
24.00 - 26.00
24.00
°oo
SP, SAND, trace clay, tan and white,
2.00
25
mottled red, non -cohesive, firm, wet
SP
13
m
2-2 4-6
6
2.00
357.31
3/8"
26.00 - 34.00
-
BePellets
Pellets
26.00
SP, SAND, trace clay, tan and white,
m
2.00
mottled red, non -cohesive, loose, wet
14
m
2-1-2-5
3
2.00
355
15
u)
3 4-5-7
9
.00
2.00
30
SP
16
�
1-1-5-9
6
00
2.00
17
ai
5-13-14-10
27
2.00
350
2.00
349.31
34.00 - 36.00
34.00
#2 Filter
SP, SAND, some clay, tan, non -cohesive,
2.00
_
Sand
35
compact, wet
SP
18
y
6-2-6-8
8
2.00
0.010"
347.31
Slotted
Screen
36.00 - 38.00
36.00
CH, CLAY, some sand, coarse sand, red,2.00
cohesive, very stiff
CH
19
(n
4-8-19-35
27
2.00
345.31
345
38.00 - 40.00
38.00
CH, CLAY, some sand, coarse sand, tan,
cohesive, very stiff
CH
20
10-14-16-10
30
2.00
40
343.31
Boring completed 40.00
LOG SCALE: 1 in = 5 ft GA INSPECTOR: Darren Cox
DRILLING COMPANY: Geologic Exploration CHECKED BY:
DRILLER: Jacob Messick DATE: G 0 L 1) E R

WELL CONSTRIJCTION RECORD
This form can he used for single or multiple wells
For Internal Use ONLY:
1. Well Contractor Information:
JACOB MESSICK
Well Contractor Name
A - 4252
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC
Company Name
2, Well Construction Permit 9;
l,icl all applicable ire11 construction permits 0. e_ County, Stale, 11artance, rlc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
Agricultural
❑Geothermal (Heating/Coohng Supply)
❑ Industrial/Commere jai
❑ irrigation
Nan -Water Supply Well:
71Monitorin2
❑Municipal/Public
❑Residential Water Supply (single)
❑Residential Water Supply (shared)
C
❑Aquifer Recharge
❑Groundwaler Remediation
❑Aquifer Storage and Recovery
❑Salinity Barrier
El Aquifer Test
❑Stormwater Drainage
❑Experimental Technology
❑Subsidence Control
❑Geothermal (Closed Loop)
❑Tracer
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Return)
❑Other (explain under 421 Re
4, Date Well(s) Completed: 06/26/20
Well ID# M W -13 D R
5a. Well Location:
MOORE COUNTY LANDFILL
FacilityNJwmer Name Facility 1 D# (if applicable)
456 TURNING LEAF WAY ABERDEEN 28315
Fhvsical Address, City, and Zip
MOORE
COuntr
Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
513. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrces:
(if wcll field, one latllong is sulfcient)
350 08' 51.22" N 790 28' 52.67" W
6. Is (are) the well(s): MPermanent or ❑Temporary
7, is this a repair to an existing well: []Yes or ZINo
lfehis is o repair. fill nut knnrrn „'ell construction irjbi-,a Finn and explabr the nature of the
repnir under :i21 rernark.r sec•rion or an the back of ihn form.
8. Number of wells constructed: 1
Rai rnuhiple in;C'M` ill or non -water supph^ welly On F iviat the scone c in.vtr11c'fion, yva can
subnrff nue_%arm.
9. Total well depth below land surface: 40.0 (ft.)
1-or nnrlftple mells lisi all deplha rf dij]Erenl (example- 3@200' and 2 r@i 100')
Ill. Sufic water level below top of casing: 20.0
If water level a ahm'e casing. ase
I1. Borehole diameter: 8-0 011.)
A
22. Certification:
07/08/20
Sig —tare of Certified Well Contractor pale
By signing this' form, I hereby certify that the
uae11(s) Was (were) consfructed in accordance
with 1-)A NCAC 02C.0100 or I5A NC AC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a
copy ofthis record has been provided to the we/1 owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
construction details- You may also attach additional pages if necessary_
SUBMITTAL INSTUCTIONS
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Quality, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24.1
UGER above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
12. Weil construction method: constmetion to the following.
(Lc. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc_)
Division of Water Quality, Underground Injection Control Program,
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 1636 Mai[ Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
13a. Yield (gptn) Method of test: 24c. For Water Supplv & 1114ection Wells: in addition to sending the form to
the address(es) above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of
13b. Disinfection type: Amount: completion of well construction to the county health department of the county
where constructed_
Form G W-i North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resum-ces — Division of Water Qwi ity Revised Jan. 2013

RECORD OF BOREHOLE MW-13SR SHEET 1of 1
PROJECT: Moore County LF DRILL RIG: Diedrich D-50 NORTHING: 1,853,164.04
PROJECT NUMBER: 19133605 DATE STARTED: 6/25/20 EASTING: 509,549.23
DRILLED DEPTH: 20.00 ft DATE COMPLETED: 6/25/20 GS ELEVATION: 383.87
LOCATION: Aberdeen, NC TOC ELEVATION: 386.57 ft
SOIL PROFILE
SAMPLES
z
v
ELEV.
O
z
w
O
PIEZOMETER
PIEZOMETER
w
v
a O
W
Lu
BLOWS
O
DIAGRAM and NOTES
CONSTRUCTION
p
w
DESCRIPTION
O
J
J
EL
per 6 in
;
w
DETAILS
W
p
D H
CO
fin)
N
140lb hammer
ZZ
HJ
30 inch drop
0
0.00 - 2.00p
.29
WELL CASING
MH, Clayey SILT, medium plasticity, tan
MH
1
m
8-8-5-2
13
2.00
Interval: 0'- 10'
brow, cohesive, W<PL, firm
rn
2.00
Material: Schedule 40 PVC
381.87
Diameter: 2"
Portland `9
Joint Type: Threated
2.00 - 4.00
2.00
SM, Silty SAND, fine sand, some clay, tan,
U)
1.25
_
Type 1 °"
yp
cohesive, W<PL, soft
SM
2
a)
3-2-3-2
5
2 00
ea' gw
WELL SCREEN
380
79.8
379.87
Riser-
Interval: 10'-20'
Material: Schedule 40 PVC
4.00 - 6.00
4.00
Diameter: 2"
5
MH, Clayey SILT, clayey silt to sand, fine
MH
3
5-3-3-3
6
1 25
Slot Size: 0.010"
sand, brown to tan, cohesive, W<PL, soft
(n
2 00
End Cap:
377.87
3/8"
Bentonite -
FILTER PACK
6.00 - 8.00
6.00
Clayey SAND, coarse sand, some silt,
SC
4
(n
3-4-18-19
22
2Q0
Pellets
Interval:
to onge, cohesive, W-PL, soft to firm
tan orange,
�
2.00
Filter
Type: #2 Filter Sand
375.87
FILTER PACK SEAL
8.00 - 10.00
8.00
375
MH, Clayey SILT, clayey silt to clayey sand,
MH
5
9-11-12-5
23
2 00
Interval: 5'-8'
Type: 3/8" Bentonite Pellets
fine sand, tan to orange, non -cohesive,
2 00
10
W-PL, soft
373.87
ANNULUS SEAL
10.00
10.00 - 12.00
Interval: 0'- 5'
MH, Clayey SILT, clayey silt to sand, coarse
1.75
Type: Portland Type I
sand, tan orange, non -cohesive, compact,
MH
6
3-3-2-3
5
2.00
loose, wet
371 87
WELL COMPLETION
Pad: Tx Tx0.5'
12.00-14.00
12.00
SP, SAND, coarse sand, mottled red at 13',
n
2.00
#2 Filter
Protective Casing: Aluminum
tan, non -cohesive, loose, wet
SP
7
m
9-10-10-11
20
2.00
Sand
370
369.87
DRILLING METHODS
Soil DHII: 4.25 inch HSA
14.00
14.00 - 16.00
0.010"
Rock Drill: N/A
SP, SAND, coarse sand, trace clay and silt,
n
2.00
15
tan, non -cohesive, loose, wet
SP
8
m
1-5-5-3
10
2.00
Slotted -
367.87
Screen
16.00 - 18.00
16.00
SP, SAND, coarse sand, tan with purple
m
2.00
oxidation stains at 17', non -cohesive, loose,
SP
9
m
2-3-7-8
10
2,00
wet
365.87
18.00 - 20.00
18.00
365
SP SAND, coarse sand, tan with purple
m
2.00
oxidation stains, non -cohesive, loose, wet
SP
10
rn
9-3-5-4
8
2.00
20
363.87
Boring completed at 20.00 ft
360
25
355
30
350
35
345
40
LOG SCALE: 1 in = 5 ft GA INSPECTOR: Darren Cox
DRILLING COMPANY: Geologic Exploration CHECKED BY:
DRILLER: Jacob Messick DATE: G O L D E a

WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
'this form can be used for single or multiple wells
Fur Internal Use ONLY:
L Well Contractor Information:
JACOB MESSICK
Well Contractor Name
A - 4252
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit#:
List all applicable hell eanornenon permils (i.e. Counly, Stale, !Variance, etc,)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
❑Agricultural
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
❑ IndustriallCommercial
❑MunicipallPublic
❑Residential Water Supply (single)
❑Residential Water Supply (shared)
Non -Water Supply Well:
M Monitorine ❑ Reeovery
❑Aquifer Recharge
❑Aquifer Storage and Recovery
❑Aquifer Test
❑Experimental Technology
0Gcothermal (Closed Loop)
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling
4. Date Nyell(s) Completed:
❑Groundwater Remediation
❑Salinity Barrier
❑.Stormwater Drainage
❑Subsidence Control
❑Tracer
❑Other (explain under 921 I
06/26/20 We]11D# MW-13SR
Sa. Well Location:
MOORE COUNTY LANDFILL
Facility/Owner Name Facility iD# (if applicable)
456 TURNING LEAF WAY ABERDEEN 28315
Physical Address, City, and Zip
MOORE
County
Parcel Identification No_ (PIN)
14. WATER ZONES
FROM
TO
DESCRIPTION
ft.
ft.
ft.
R.
IS. OUTFR CASING for mlrl6-cased wells OR L1NER if a Gcable
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
ft,
ft.
in.
16. INNER CASING OR TUBING(geothermal closed -too pp
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
0.0 fI.
10.0 ft.
2.0 ;n.
SCH 40
PVC
ft,
I ft.
in.
17. SCREEN
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
SLOT SIZE
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
10.0 fL
20.0 ft•
2.0 in.
.010
SCH 40
PVC
rt,
ft.
in.
Ill. GROUT
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
KMPLACEMENTMETHOD & AMOUNT
ao ft.
5.0 ft,
RORTLANaeeNTONITa
SLURRY
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
19. SAND)CRAVEL PACK if applicable)
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENTNIETHOD
8.0 ft
20,0 ft•
20-40
FINE SILICA SAND
it.
ft.
20. DRILLING LOG attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM
TO
I DESCRIPTION (color, hardness, soillrocklype, zraln size, ete.)
0.0 ft-
10.0 ft•
TAN/BROWN SILTY SAND
10,0 ft•
20.0 It.
TAN SILTY SAND
ft,
ft
ft.
ft-
rt_
ft.
rt.
ft.
ft.
ft.
21. REMARKS
BFNTONITF SEAL FROM 5.0 TO 8.0 FEET
5b. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees: 22. Certification:
(ifwcll field, one lat/long is sufficient)
350 08' 51.22" N 79" 28' 52.67" NN' A16 07/08/2.0
Signature of Certified Well Contractor Date
6. Is (are) the well(s): ©Permanent or ❑Temporary By signing lha farm, I hereby cortif
y thou the we11(s) was (Isere} canslrucred In accordance
rrith 15A SC AC 02C 0100 or 15A MAC 02C.0200 Well Construction S'landards and rhos a
7. is this a repair to an existing well: ❑Yes or ENo copy ofihis record hoc been provided ra the well owner.
If lhis it a repair, fill out knuirn well construction lnf>rmalion and explain fhe nature of the
repuir under 471 remark# section or on the back of din form_ 23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
S. Number of wells constructed: 1 construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
lvir multiple injection ar non -water supply welly ONLY with the same construction, you can
subuuie one form_ SUBMFFTAL INSTUCTIONS
9. Total well depth below land surface: 20,0 (ft,) 24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
For multiple (sells list oil depths ifdijferent (example- 3Q200' mod 2 n 100� Construction to the following:
10. Static water level below top of casing: 12.0 (ft,) Division of Water Quality, Information Processing Unit,
iJlrarer level is above casing, use 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
11. Borehole diameter: 8.0 (in.) 24b, For Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24a
AUGER above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
12, Well construction method: construction to the following:
(i.e_ auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
Division of Water Quality, Underground Injection Control Program,
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test: 24c, For Water Supply & Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to
the address(es) above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of
13b. Disinfection type: Amount- completion of well construction to the county heallh department of the county
where constructed_
Fortu GW-I North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality Revised Jan. 2013

RECORD OF BOREHOLE MW-19 SHEET 1of 1
PROJECT: Moore County LF DRILL RIG: Diedrich D-50 NORTHING: 1,852,158.78
PROJECT NUMBER: 19133605 DATE STARTED: 6/26/20 EASTING: 509,324.26
DRILLED DEPTH: 13.00 ft DATE COMPLETED: 6/26120 GS ELEVATION: 363.95
LOCATION: Aberdeen, NC TOC ELEVATION: 366.67 ft
SOIL PROFILE
SAMPLES
z
v
ELEV.
O
z
w
O
PIEZOMETER
PIEZOMETER
w
v
a O
W
Lu
BLOWS
O
DIAGRAM and NOTES
CONSTRUCTION
p
w
DESCRIPTION
O
J
J
EL
per 6 in
;
w
DETAILS
W
p
D H
CO
fin)
N
140lb hammer
ZZ
30 inch drop
0
0.00 - 2.00
tn
.2:
WELL CASING
SP, SAND, medium, tan -brown,
SP
1
m
2-3-2-3
5
2.00
Portland _
Interval: 0' - 5'
non -cohesive, loose, moist
rn
2.00
Type I
Material: Schedule 40 PVC
361.95
3/8"
Diameter:2"
2.00 - 4.00
Bentonite
Joint Type: Threaded
2.00
SP, SAND, medium, mottled orange at 3.5',
1.00
Pellets
loose, wet
SP
2
a)3-2-4-4
8
2.00
WELL SCREEN
359.95
Interval: 5'-13'
360
4.00 - 6.00
Riser-
Material: Schedule 40 PVC
4.00
5
SP, SAND, medium, mottled orange from
SP
3
5-2-3-3
5
1.50
Diameter:0.
Slot Size: 0.010"
5.25' to 6.00', loose, wet
(n
2.00
End Cap:
357.95
6.00 - 8.00
6.00
FILTER PACK
SP, SAND, medium to coarse, mottled
U)
1.25
Interval: T-13'
orange, loose, wet
SP
4
(n
3-4-4-4
8
2.00
Type: #2 Filter Sand
355.95
8.00 - 11.00
#2 Filter
FILTER PACK SEAL
8.00
SP, SAND, medium sand, tan -white, loose,
N
1.00
-
Sand
Interval: 1'-3'
355
wet
5
�
4-2-1-1
3
2.00
0.010"
Type: 3/8" Bentonite Pellets
�
10
SP
Slotted
Screen
ANNULUS SEAL
Interval: 0' - 1'
352.95
6
(n
1-2-9-31
11
2.00
Type: Portland Type
11.00 - 12.00
CH
11.00
2.00
CH, CLAY, clay with sand, medium sand,
351.95
WELL COMPLETION
white tan with purple, firm to stiff, cohesive,
Pad: Tx Tx 0.5'
12.00
moist to dry
00
Protective Casing: Aluminum
12.00 - 14.00
SC
7
27-37 41-50
78
2.00
SC, Clayey SAND, medium to coarse sand,
349 95
DRILLING METHODS
350
tan purple, compact to loose, moist
Soil Drill: 4.25 inch HSA
14.00
Rock Drill: N/A
Boring completed at 13.00 ft
15
345
20
340
25
335
30
330
35
325
40
LOG SCALE: 1 in = 5 ft GA INSPECTOR: Darren Cox
DRILLING COMPANY: Geologic Exploration CHECKED BY:
DRILLER: Jacob Messick DATE: G O t D E R

WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
This form cart be used for single or multiple wells
For Internal Use ONLY'.
1. Well Contractor Information:
JACOB MESSICK
Well Contractor Name
A - 4252
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit 4:
List all applicable weld con.rtruenon permits (i.e. County, State, Variance, etc,)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
❑ Agricultural D Municipal/Public
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooting Supply) ❑Residential Water Supply (single)
❑Industrial/Commercjai DResidential Water Supply (shared)
[]Irrigation
Non -Water Supply Well:
C]+ Monitoring ❑ Recovery
[]Aquifer Recharge
C]Aquifer Storage and Recovery
❑Aquifer Test
[]Experimental Technology
UGeothermal (Closed Loop)
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling
4. Date Wetl(s) Completed:
❑Groundwater Remediation
❑Salinity Barrier
❑Stormwater Drainage
Subsidence Control
❑Tracer
❑Other (explain under #21 I
06/26/20 W ell IDLY G P-1 Q R
Sa. Well Location:
MOORE COUNTY LANDFILL
Facility/Owner Name Facility I D# (if applicable)
456 TURNING LEAF WAY ABERDEEN 28315
Physical Address, City, and Zip
MOORE
County
Parcel identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(ifwell field, one lat/long is sufficient)
35D 08' 51.22" N 790 28' 52.67" W
14. WATER ZONES
FROM
TO DESCRIPTION
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
15, OUTER CASING for mold -cased wells OR LINER if a licable
FROM
TO
mAMETER
TH [CKNESS
MATERIAL
ft.
fr.
in.
16. INNER CASING OR TUBING(geothermal
closed -loop)
FROM
To
DIAMETER
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
0.0 ft.
5.0 ft'
2.0 in'
SCH 40
PVC
ft.
ft.
in.
17- SCREEN
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
SLOT SIZE
TRICKNESS
MATERIAL
5.0 ft.
15.0 ft.
2.0 in.
.010
SCH 40
PVC
ft.
ft.
in.
18. GROUT
FROM
I TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT
0.0 ft,
20 ft'
PORTLO.NDaENTONITE
SLURRY
ft
ft.
ft.
ft.
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK ifa livable
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD
4.0 ft-
15.0 ft.
20-40
FINE SILICA SAND
ft.
ft.
20. DRILLING
LOG (attach additional sheets if necessar
FROM
TO
DESCRIPTION (color, hardness, soiVrock typw, go-ain size, etc-)
0.0 ft-
5.0 ft.
TAN/BROWN SANDY SILT
5.0 ft.
15.0 ft.
TAN SAND
ft.
rr.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft,
ft.
ft
ft.
ft.
21. REMARKS
BENTONITE SEAL FROM 2.0 TO 4.0 FEET
22. Certification.-
07/08/20
Signatu- of`C.nnflzd weft Contractor
6. Is (are) the well(s)t (EPermanent or []Temporary
By .signing this farm, J hereby certify Thal the melt{s) was (SrereJ can.strucled in acc'orvTant'e
u'ilh 13.I NCAC 02C .0100 or 15-4 NC AC 02C 0201) Well Conslruc6otr Standards and that a
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: DYes or ©No copy ofthis record has been provided to the ,vel/ mrer
If'this is a repair, Jill out known well construction inJornalion and explain the nature ofthe
mpatr ruiner e21 reinarks section or on the back r f this farm_ 23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
8. Number ofwells constructed: 1 construction details. You may also attach additional pages ifnecessary.
hor multiple injeeiion or nan-trarersupply trrlls ONLY wrth the sane construction, you eon
submit one farts. SUBMITTAL INSTUCTIONS
9. Total well depth below land surface: 15.0 (ft.) 24a• For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
For multiple wells list all deptim iJ'd erena (example-3 200' and 2@/00') Construction to the following:
10. Static water level below top of casing:
Ifn^oler level is above raving, use " "
11. Borehole diameter: 8.0 (in.)
AUGER
(ft,) Division of Water Quality, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Iniection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24a
above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
12. Well construction method: construction to the following.-
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
Division of Water Quality, Underground Injection Control Program,
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
13a. Yield (Rpm) Method of test: 24c, For Water Supply & Iniectiou Wells: In addition to sending the form to
the address(es) above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of
13b, Disinfection type: Amount, completion of well construction to the county health department of fhe county
where constructed.
Form GW-t North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality Revised Jan, 20 B

Appendix II - Natural Attenuation Screening Protocol Forms

Natural Attenuation Inter retation score TO INPUT
Screening Ina dva. vts avidenca f.r a n c..eti:6:. d.arades i.n .F of l.r:natvd.raaniu O to s
Protocol:T.i.edvv dvnz.r.. ,n,rr.F:e l i.d. t..dai.n•et ct t..i a•rd..,,•:v b to lA Score: I8
"�+^i• �"`•r' ••-`�'"r.-o-. i`•" Adeauaty vvidvnee F.r, r.bi<bi.de vredae:. n'.r ehf..inaeed.r„niv 15 to 20
-a►.wr
$er.e,.uil.nse Far anea.d is b.. d. ueJet:.n•ef chle r:natvJ.r. aniu >20 SczaAr to E+d of 7r
Concentration in t J Points
Analysis most Contain. zone Interpretation Yes No Awwde
Qxygtn'
<0.5 mg1L
Tolerated, auppressce the reductivc pathway at higher
3
c on c ent. ation
> 5m)!L
Not toltratcd; 6owcvtr, VC may bt oxidixcd aerobically
0
Nitrate'
<1 m91L
At higher coneentrationa may compete with reductivc.
0
athwa
Iron Il'
>1 mglL
Reductive pathway possible; VC may bt oxidixcd under
'
0
FcI`1111-rcdvciAq conditions
sulfate'
<20 mgll.
At higher concentration: may compete with reductivc
r..
2
nthwa
sulfide-
>1 m9k
Deductive pathway possible
0
Methane'
>0.5 mgll
Ukimatt reductivc daughtcr product, VC Accumulates
f.
3
Oxidation
<50 millivolt: (mV)
Reductive pathway po§:iblc
1
Rtdu<tioa
t'
Potential• (OAP)
<-100mV
Reductive pathway likely
�,,
i,
2
PH'
5 < pH < 8
Optimal rang¢ for rtductivc pathway
i
0
TOC
>20 m911.
Carbon and cncrgy sourcc: drives dcchlorination: can be
c.�
*,
0
natural or anthro o cnic
Temperature'
>20'C
At T >20'C bio<hemieal proctss is acc0trattd
f
1
Carbon Dioxide
>2x background
Ultimate oxidative daughter product
�,,
t'
1
Alkalinity
>2x background
Results from interaction of carbon dioxide with aquif cr
Ir
1
minerals
Chloride'
>2x background
Daughter product of organic chlorine
2
Hydrogcn
>1 nM
Reductive pathway possible, VC may aceumulatc
Volatile Fatty Acid
MI mglL
Intcrmtdiatcs resulting from biodegradation of aromatic
a
*,
0
com ounds; cxbon and cntr sourcc
BTEX•
>0.1 m91L
Carbon and cncrgy sourcc; drives dcchlorination
0
PCE'
Material rdeascd
TCE'
Daughtcr product of PCE 'f
e,
0
DCE'
Oaughtcr product of TCE.
If ci: is greater than 80% of total DCE it is likely a daughter
2
product of TCE":1,1-DCE can be a chtm. reaction product of TCA
VC'
Daughtcr product of OCE'r
r
0
I.I.I.
Material rcicascd
0
Trichlorocthane'
DCA
Daughtcr product of TCA under rcducin) conditions
0
Carbon
Mlattrial rcicastd
r
0
Tetrachloride
_
Chlosoethanc'
Daughter product of DCA or VC under reducing <ondi6ons
r
0
EthtnclEthant
>0.01 mgll.
Daughtcr product of VClcthcnc
0
>0.1 rnglL
Daughtcr product of VClcthcnc
r
*'
0
Chloroform
Daughtcr product of CwbonTctrachloridc
0
Dichloromcthanc
Daughtcr product of Chloroform
0
' rcquircd analysis.
41 Point: awarded only if it can be shown that the compound is a daughter product TO INPUT I SCORE
(i,t.. not a constituent of the sourcc NAPL).
Date: 05/19/23
MNA Screening Protocol Form
Exhibit No.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII' Project ID: 4358-20-043D
Well MW-4 (October 2022)
II -A
Prepared by: EH
VI E
Moore County Landfill
Reviewed by:
T:\Greensboro-1580\Projects\2020\4358-20-043D Moore County Landfill\Task B - CAER Report\epa screening forms.xlsx

Natural Attenuation Interpretation
Screening Inadequate evidence for anaerobic biodegradation' of chlorinated Organics
Protocol Limited evidence for anaerobic biodegradation' of chi orinated organic$
Score TO INPUT
0 to 5
Score. ZU
Serrrll fa End of To.
6 to 14
15 to 20
I •�+'JSEVA.
rs0!] lrr rams d ra � • i ..:.nv .� •.o,awri
Adequate enc videe for anaerobic biodegradation hl of corinated organics
5tron evidence for anaerobic biode iodation' of chlorinated or anics
>20
Concentration in Points
Analysis Most Cor-Aam. Zone Interpretation Yes Na Awaidad
path ay
Sulfide"
> 1 mg?L
Reductive pathway possible
y.
0
Methane"
>0.5 mg'L
Ultimate reductive daughter product, VC .Accumulates
lip,0
Oxidation
Reduction
Potential" (ORP)
<50 millivolts (mV)
Reductive pathway possible
�'
'
<-100mV
Reductive pathway likely
pH"
5 < pH < 9
Optimal range for reductive pathway
r-
0
TOC
>20 mg'L
Carbon and energy source, drives dechlorination; can be
natural or anthro o enic
0
Temperature"
>201C
At T >20'C biochemical process is accelerated
Carbon Dioxide
>2x background
Ultimate oxidative daughter product
,
1
Alkalinity
>2x background
Results from interaction of carbon dioxide with aquifer
minerals
Chloride"
>2x background
Daughter product of organic chlorine
�.
r.
2
Hydrogen
>1 nM
Reductive pathway possible. VC may accumulate
0
vordnrp tartyW licru
�u. r nzyrL
rntUrnrCararCs resulting rronr uwacyrdUdtcon or drpnrdnc
compounds, carbon and energy source
..
,�
V
BTEX"
>0.1 mg'L
Carbon and energy source, drives dechlorination
2
PCE"
Material released
0
TCE"
Daughter product of PCE °'
,.
0
DCE"
Daughter product of TCE.
If cis is greater than 80% of total DCE it is likely a daughter
roduct of TCE" 1.1-DCE can be a chem. reaction product of TC.'
.
2
VC"
Daughter product of DCE•'
2
1,11-
Trichl oroethane`
Material released
0
DCA
Daughter product of TCA under reducing conditions
0
Carbon
Tetrachloride
Material released
0
Chloroethane"
Daughter product of DCA or VC under reducing conditions
r
z.
0
EthenelEthane
4.01 mg'L
Daughter product of VClethene
r
r�
0
>0.1 mg'L
Daughter product of VOethene
7,
'X
0
Chloroform
Daughter product of Carbon Tetrachloride
0
Diehioromekhane
Daughter product of Chloroform
0
' required analysis.
al Points awarded only if it can be shown that the compound is a daughter product TO INPUT Reset
[i.e., not a constituent of the source NAPL).
Date: 05/19/23
Project ID: 4358-20-043D
frfffffr Prepared by: EH
Reviewed by:
MNA Screening Protocol Form
Well MW-6 (October 2022)
Moore County Landfill
Exhibit No.
II-B
T:\Greensboro-1580\Projects\2020\4358-20-043D Moore County Landfill\Task B - CAER Report\epa screening forms.xlsx

Natural Attenuation Interpretation Score TO04PUT
Screening Inadcquatc cvidcnce for an bit 0 to sJ
Protocol Limited evidence for anaerobic biodegradation' of ehnor:natcd organics & to 14 Score: 25
- ••- Adequate evidence for anae rabic of cMor inaecd organic; 15 to 20
Strong aridance for anxrobie biodcgrada"e of chlorinated organic > 2Q .Scroota End of T.3
Concentration in Points
Analysis Most Contam. Zone Interpretation Ies o Awarciec
Oxyaen'
<0.5 mglL
Toter ated, suppresses the reductive pathway at higher
�_
3
concentrations
> 5mg)L
Not tolerated: however. VC may be oxidized aerobically
0
Nurate'
<1 mglL
At higher concentrations may compete with reductive
W
2
pathway
Iron ]I'
>1 mglL
Reductive pathway possible: VC may be oxidized under
j
3
Fetil 1) - F ed ucin2 conditions
Sulfate'
<20 mg1L
At higher concentrations may compete with reductive
W
2
pathway
Sulfide'
>1mglL
Reductive pat hwaypossible
{
Q
Methane'
>0.5 mg1L
Ultimate reductive daughter product, VC Accumulates
z_
3
Oxidation
<50 mill iwolts (mV)
Reductive pathway possible
1
Redvctiur
,4-
F'
<-100mV
Reductive pathway likely
2
Potential' (ORP)
pFi
5 < pF < 3
Optimal range for reductive pathw ay
0
TOC
> 20 mg1L
Carbon and energy source; drives dechlorination: can be
0
natural or anthro o enic
Temperature'
>20'C
At T >20'C biochemical process is accelerated
1
Carbon Dioxide
>2x background
Ultimate oxidative daughter product
�.
1
Alkalinity
>2x background
Results from interaction of carbon dioxide with aquifer
Q
1
minerals
Chloride'
>2x background
Daughter product of organic chlorine
W
2
Kpdrogen
> 1 nM
Reductive pathway possible, VC may accumulate
0
Volatile Fatty Aci ds
>0.1 mg1L
Intermediates resulting From biodegradation of aromatic
0
compounds: carbon and ene rqy source
STEX'
>0.1 mg1L
Carbon and energy source: drives dechlorination
C
0
PCE'
Material released
0
TGIF
Daughter product of PCE''
W
0
DCE'
Daughter product of TCE.
If cis is greater than 8Q% of total DCE it is likely a daughter
®
{
2
roduct of TCE'':1.1-DCE can be a them. reactien p roduo t of TCA
VC'
Daughter product of DCE"
2
1,11-
Material released
W
0
Trichloroethane'
DCA
Daughter product of TCA under reducing conditions
W
0
Carbon
Material released
W.
Tetrachloride
Chloreethane'
Daughter product of DCA or VC under reducing conditions
Q
0
EthenelEthane
>0.01 mg IL
Daughter product of VClethene
�.
i i
>0.1 malL
Daughter product of VClethene
Q
0
Chloroform
Daughter product of Carbon Tetrachloride
Q
ik
Dichloromethane
Daughter product of Chloroform
Q
iJ
'required analysis.
al Points awarded only if it can be shown that the compound is a daughter product TO INPUT I SCORE Fese:
(i.e.. not a constituent of the source NAPL).
Date: 05/19/23
MNA Screening Protocol Form
Exhibit No.
Project ID: 4358-20-043D
Well MW-11SR (October 2022)
II-C
Prepared by: EH
Ew
Moore County Landfill
Reviewed by:
T:\Greensboro-1580\Projects\2020\4358-20-043D Moore County Landfill\Task B - CAER Report\epa screening forms.xlsx

atural Attenuation Interpretation 5colre TO INPUT
Screening Inad..vaR.. id.nc.f.r.n.... ►icImJ.4'.4.1i.. .rcll..i .l.J...aniu 0to5
Protocol LimieadaviJ.Heel.ranger.►ic►:.4a4,44aei.n'.f,Merin.tvJ.r•ts iu 6to14 Score: '_3
M� M •�•• �• +•-++••r••�y -•+•�+ AJo q�•l. vv: Jvnty fr....... I. it ►i..1 Jql i.n`.f cl.l.r in.* J o. gen iu 15 to 20
•��� Ser.n .viJ.ne. f.r .na.rebie bide radnei.n'.f c/.l. r:naea l.r a >20 Srrolf to E+d of T�
Concentration in Paints
Analysis Most Contain. Zone Interpretation Yes Na Awarde
Oxygen'
<0-5 mg1L
Tolerated, suppres:c: the reductive pathway at higher
�.
3
concentration,
> 5n,q&
Not tolerated; however, VC may be oxidi:cd aerobically
�.,
0
Nitrate'
<A mgrL
At higher concentrations may eompcte with rcdue tivc
t
2
athwa
Iron II'
>1 mgrL
Reductive pathway possible; VC may be oxidised under
i-' 3
Fc Ili-reducin conditions
Sulfate'
c20 mgrL
At higher concentrations may compete with reductive
r.
2
pathway
Sulfide'
>1 mgrL
Rcductive pathway passibfc
1
Ir
r,
3
Methane'
>0.5 mg1L
Ultimatt reductive dwgMtr product, VC Accumvlatcs
r,
3
Ozid*A'o
<50 millivolt: (mV]
Reductive pathway possible
1
Ftaductioa
r
c-100mV
Reductive pathway likely
r.
Ir
0
Potcntial' [ORP]
p#P
5 c pH (3
Optimal range for reductive pathway
A
TQC
>20 mg1L
Carbon and energy --ourcc; drivts dcchtorination; can be
IF
r
natural or anthro oacntc
Tamptratvre'
>20'C
At T >20'C biochemical procc., is accelerated
r,
Ir
it
Carbon Dioxide
>2x background
Ultimate oxidative daughter product
1
Alkalinity
>2x background
Results from interaction of carbon dioxide with agvifer
olc
I
1
Chloride'
>2x background
Davghtcr product of organic chlorine
0
Hydrogen
>1 nM
Reductive pathway passible. VC may aecumulatt
0
Volatile Fatty Acid
>0A mg1L
Intermediate: resulting from biodegradation of aromatic
r
0
cam P ovnds: carbon and enee gy : our cc
t3TEX,
>0.1 mg1L
Carbon and energy sourer: drive: dcchlorination
r,
0
P 'E'
Mattrol relta:cd
I
r�
0
TCE•
Davghtcr product of PCE 'r
r
0
DCE•
Daughter product of TC£-
If cis is grcatcr than 60% of total DCE it is likely a daughter
$1,
r,
2
product of TCE'+:1.1•DCE can be a them. reaction product of TCA
VC'
Dwghter product of DCE"
r-
0
tl.f-
rvlatcrial released
r
0
Trichlaroethane•
'
OCA
Daughter product of TCA under reducing conditions
r
i,
0
Carbon
releascd
r,
it
0
Te-trachloride
Cb%g0&thanc'
Davghtcr product of DCA or VC under rc ducing conditions
0
EthanclEthanc
>0.01 mg1L
Daughter product of VCkthcnc
0
>0.1 mgll
Daughter product of VCltthcnr
r;
0
,
Chloroform
❑sughtcr product of CarbonTctrachlaride
L
or
0
�iehloromethane
Davghtcr product of Chloroform
0
required analysis, f
at1 Points awarded only if it can be shown that the compound is a davghtcr product TO INPUT + SCORE
(Le.. not a constituent of the :ourcc NAPL].
Date: 05/19/23
MNA Screening Protocol Form
Exhibit No.
Project ID: 4358-20-043D
Well MW-15R (October 2022)
II-D
Prepared by: EH
Moore County Landfill
Reviewed by:
T:\Greensboro-1580\Projects\2020\4358-20-043D Moore County Landfill\Task B - CAER Report\epa screening forms.xlsx

Natural Attenuation Inter retation Score TO MPUT
Screening 11. u.11 qa....i 4. nee f n r 41 rabic b:r lcr F uJ.,eio of cKPfi F I It a Jar, enii 0to5
Protocol 6to14 Score: 24
• '_, .�.w.....„�, 4 i:Jeavat. svide•.cefsr an rabic bide vradaNs.: sf sAte.:..aled s.aar.iv 15 to 20
- Serena auilane.f nranaare>20 Scroll ecad o! Ts
Concentration in Points
Analysis Most Contam. Zoac Interpretation Yes No Awafde
`Oxygen'
I <0.5 mgrL
Toltrattd, supprc.ccs the reductive pathway at higher
I
I
I
3
I
I
conccrtrationc
> Small-
No* rnlrrared• however. VC mau he nridixd aernhicallu
f7
- _--.a _
..__, _ _.__.___
Nitrate'
<1 mg7L
At higher concentrations may compttc with rtdvctivc
r
r+
2
athwa
Iron II'
>1 mglL
Reductive pathway possible; VC may be oxidi:cd under
Fe III-reduein 9 condition:
Sulfate'
<20 m91L
At higher concentration: may compete with reductive
.
r-.
2
pathway
Sulfide'
>1 mg7L
Reductive pathway possible
r,
3
Methant'
>0.5 mg1i
Ultimate reductive daughter product, VC Accumulate:
r
3
Oxidation
<50 millivoks (mV)
Reductive pathway possible
1
Redaction
c-100mV
Rcdactive pathway likely
Potential' (ORP)
pN'
5 < pH < 3
Optimal range for rCdaCrjVC pathway
r
0
TOC
>20 mg1L
Carbon and energy source; drives dechlorination; can be
i
2
natural or anthr4 P enic
Temperatwe'
>20'C
At T >20'C biochemical process is accelerated
�
0
Carbon Dioxide
>2x background
Ultimate oxidative daughter product
0
Alkalinity
>2x background
Results from interaction of Carbon digxide with aquifer
rule
Chloride'
>2x background
Daughter product of organic chlorine
r'-+
2
Hydrogtn
>1 nM
Rcdmetive pathway possible, VC may accumulate
�,
0
Volatile Fatty Acid
>0.1 mgrL
Intermediates resulting from biodegradation of aromatic
0
compound:: carbon and energy touccc
STEX'
>0A mgll
Carbon and energy :ouree; drives dechlorination
0
PCE'
Material released
,I,
f.
0
TCE'
Daughter product of PCE '`
I.
0
DCE'
Daughter product of TCE.
If cit is greater than 80% of total DCE it is likely a daughter
r
IF
0
roduct oFTCE'f; 1,1-0CE can be a chem. reaction product of TCA
VC'
Daughter product of DCE'f
L,
0
1,1.1-
Material released
IV
0
Teichlorocthanc'
DCA
Daughter product of TCA under reducing conditions
f
0
Carbon
Material released
0
Tetrachloride
Chlorocthanc'
Oaughtcc product of DCA or VC under reducing conditions
0
EthcncrEthanc
>0 01 m97L
0amghttr product of VCrcthene
r
IF
0
>+?.1 mg1L
Daughter product of VCkthcnc
r,
0
Chloroform
❑aughtcr product of Carbon Tetrachloside
r
*,
0
DkNloromethant
Daughter product of Chloroform
IF
0
'required analy:i:.
al Point: awarded only if it can be shown that the compound is a daughter product TO INPUT SCORE Pawl
(i..c., not a constituent of the soar<c NAP L).
= 0 Date: 05/19/23
MNA Screening Protocol Form
Exhibit No.
dIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII' Project ID: 4358-20-043D
Well MW-8 (October 2022)
II-E
Prepared by: EH
E
Moore County Landfill
Reviewed by:
T:\Greensboro-1580\Projects\2020\4358-20-043D Moore County Landfill\Task B - CAER Report\epa screening forms.xlsx

Natural Attenuation Inter retation Score To INPUT
Screening inad•a aeeaudsn<el.......v►-_1.d.3.a.lve:en•vf<kf.rinated.ra.,n:e+ 0to5
Protocol L v t•d •vid. c•iv.+..•e..►ic1, ede v•.d.10 .f ch 1... •t•d v. vv v 6 to 14 Scot-e: 2_^
•�ti ter"""'r���,�---n� d.d.awts e�iJ•..ce i..an .slit►:vdea•+dat:v..'.i c►Iv.�e•t•dv.+a..�u 15 to 20
........ li<►:.dearadaei.n•.f cl.l..�na ted.r a.. iu >20 serofl to £id of iQ
Concentration In Iloints
Analysis Most Cootam. Zone Interpretation Yes No Awarde
❑xygtn•
<0.5 mg1L
Tolerated, suppresses the reductive pathway at higher
Ir
{-�
3
<onctnirations
> Smg1L
Not tolerated; howtver, VC may be oxidixsd aerobically
t;
0
Nitrate,
<1 mg1L
At higher concentration" may compcec with rcdvctivc
2
athwa
Iron Il'
>1 mglL
Reductive pathway possible; VC may be oxidtacd under ,
3
Fc III-rcducin <anditions
sulfatt•
<20 mgll
At higher concentration: may compete with rcdvctivc
2
athwa
sulfide"
>1 mg7L
Reductive pathway possible
,
r;
3
Methane"
>0.5 mg1L
Ultimate reductive daughter product. SIC Accumulate:
3
Oxidation
<50 millivolt: (mV)
Rcdvttivc pathway possible
1
r
Potential" (ORP)
<-100mV
Reductive pathway likcty
��
2
PH'
5 < pH < 9
Optimal range for rcdvctivc pathway
f,
0
TOC
>20 m91L
Carbon and energy source; drive: dechlorination; can be
r,
r
2
natural or anthra o tnic
Ttmpuature•
>20'C
At T >20'C biochemical process is acetItmitt d
1
Carbon Dioxide
>2x background
Ultimate oxidative daughter product
0
Alkalinity
>2x background
ResWit s from interaction of carbon dioxide with aquifer
lip
'"
1
mineral:
Chloride'
>2x background
Daughter product of organic chlorine
2
Hydrogen
>1 nrvl
Reductive pathway possible. VC may at<umulatc
0
Volatile Fatty Acid
>,OA mg. L
Intcrmcdiatcz resulting from biodegradation of aromatic
�,
0
compounds. carbon and energy ^.ourcc
BTEX'
>0.1 mg.l
Carbon and energy sourct; drive: dechlorination
{,
0
PCE•
Material ccica:cd
0
TCE'
Daughter product of PCE
0
DCC-
Daughter product of TCE.
If cia is greater than 80% of total DCE it is likely a daughter
0
rodvct of TCE";1.1-DCE can be a them. rcattion pcoduct of TCA
VC•
Daughter product of OCE"
0
t
1.1.1-
Material released
0
Triehlorocthanc'
DCA
Daughter product of TCA under reducing condition:
{�
0
Carbon
Material rcltased
0
Tcivathloridc
Chloroethanc•
Daughter product of DCA or VC under reducing condition:
{�
0
EthenelEthanc
>0.AI rn•:1.L
Daughter product of VClcthcnc
r
0
>0.1 m-alL
Daughter product of VClethene
r
r,
0
Chloroform
Daughter product of Carbon Tetrachloride
{,.•
�.
CI
Diehloromtthanc
Daughter product of Chloroform
r
1
• required analysis.
al Point: awarded only if it can be shown that the compound is a daughter product TO INPUT I seol:k ....
(i.c.. not a constituent of the source NAPL).
= 0 Date: 05/19/23
MNA Screening Protocol Form
Exhibit No.
dommor Project ID: 4358-20-043D
Well MW-9 (October 2022)
II-F
Prepared by: EH
E
Moore County Landfill
Reviewed by:
T:\Greensboro-1580\Projects\2020\4358-20-043D Moore County Landfill\Task B - CAER Report\epa screening forms.xlsx

Appendix III - BIOCHLOR Model

610CHL_4:7FL Natural Attenuation Mecision Support System
IA--- County LF
Version 2.2
[7ZZ dct
E...1 .00
.I2
/inn Name
TYPE OV CHLOr31 YEO SOLVENT-
Elharlea
S. =Wmm l-
1. AOVI[CTON
_
Elhanvs r
ZI-1-[len Tim a'
I Modeled Area Width'
4f3
1600
tyr)
lfq yy f
Seapage Velocity-
Va
165-5 (.lye)
J Medefad A Lnngfh•
28U0
_-
fflj i
hydraulic Conducnvlty
K
r
s_5E-09
Zene Y Length'
[cmisoc) 2_one 2 Leng u,
2SU0
0
sa}
Hydreulic Gr dlent
I
0-015
(curt)
Efr-u_ Poraal[y
n
e- =OURGR I]ATA TYPE_
Centlnueus
2_ nlSPIIS SIom
SolArca 4p[lona I
Single Planer
(Alprya y) I (Alpha x)'
7-B
(-)
_
li
Source Tryle µHas!. ]n Sat- Zon.• SS (f!)
[Alprya zJ 1 (Alprya .J'
a-E-61
(-)
YT
�- I Wlf.rf- M) la00
Fite rn ax�ion Pac�lor•
ke"
Conc- ( C1
(llyr]
Soil bulk f7.nslfy. rryP
1.T�1' [kgll_]
Pce
.Get
o
PracflpndrgarticGarbop, rpc
1 8E
Parnllgn CPwrncl4nl
PCE
KPH kg
4SG [Llkg]
PGE
VC
.G7t!
.G3
tl
TCE
13D [Llkg]
Y.14
(-y
MT"
O
oCE
193 ILlkgI
7.pq
(-)
VC
30 ILrkg1
T. vmE w u^-r^ Pom uVMPARISON
ETH
3Q2 fLJK.
3.FsR
f_-1
PGE Gan. f-11.) .5107
.007 QOl
Commas R [uawd In model)' =
2-14
TCE Conc. [mplL)
_ .W-1
DOY
i. 6iC]TRA NSFCTRMATON
-1 a! CN r wcay CclanV
�� 1uCE Cunt. [atyrL)
.DOi 1)
nOl
_.D01
�01
lone T ���
Pce _ TCE
J (llyfl
F
l�blf-I�InV�rafyf s} Y�nW
�at5 to
VG Conc. [nlplL]
ETH Gonc- (mglL)
.00Q3
n Ixx
0026
n onq
.0003
TCE OCE
0.099 F
T-00 O.TA
C�itian�E rrcm ,�-,c�r-�
100
1000
1900
OCE -- VC
O.�B2 F
l_SO 0.64
O.L Oat. GUIleclad
2f@2
VC - ETH
0231 F
J�O� O.d5
8. CHOGz TYPE of OU'
uT TO
SYi:
Zonal r ---r
PCE �j TCE
J l
0.139 F
_
Finlf-I�fo (yrsj
5.00
[fiB!-V
TCE ; oCE
G.O99 F
T_On
RUN CENTERLINE
RUN ARRAY
ocE VC
G..e2 F
two
VC ETH
G211 E
�00
PCIE
Data Input Instruatlnns_
=1s -l. Enter yaiur. dlrecny....or
2_ Calculatd by .Ring In gray
G.m cnlly_ Praaa Enler- than G l
(To .cs - I--- . hd -Rock... Formulae' buffos )
_ Varlabin __- .Sala uaad dl—"yin rrfa IaL
That Ir
aretranalbrmatlen Natural no erua l
rs L'Joeu rrin9 -� 5.reuning Protocol -
V-11-a1 Pixne- Suufrx= De-lcmnlnc Souroa Wall
1-.cation end Inpi.t—1 �ncanlrallons
vl.w or PI.— Looking bows
ona.rvcti c.ntc .line Gonc. of Mvnitg nog Wwllc
y��p Raslore RESET
$�� Past® []nprotec[
DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L) at Z O
Biovanalormationl 0 0080 1 0 003 I 0 002 I 0.001 1 0 007 1 0 001 1 a 000 I 0-000 I ❑ 000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I
l00 i 1000 1900 1_mUniturip Well Locations
..............................
Field Data from Sita 0 001 J 0 001 0 001
—No 00praWlbN3roQUCb,,—5".eW.al tat Order belay r. Field Data fr� Site
1-000
J
E 0.100
G
0
if
0.010
0
0,001
0 Soo
Prepare Animation
No
lobo 1500 2000 2500
Distance From Source (ft_)
Danoan o
1 ime-
ears UnproteCt Return to
Lag Linear Sheet Input
See PCE
See TCE
See DCE
See VC
See ETH
3500
To All 7o Array
DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (MOIL) at Z=0
Monitori?m Well Locations rt
. ........... .. ........_.............. ............
700 loco 1900
Field Dale from site
❑ 001 0 001 1 O (301
—NO Oegrad a[iorVPfoduction iSepuerYi al ls[ Order Dec ay �- Feb Oaf. ff ctn Si)e
J
1 aaa
See PCE
E
See TCE
O 100
o
See OCE
d
0-010
Sae VC
j
See ETH
r
❑ 00l
Tea© I I
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 31000 3500
Distance From Source (ftj
1 ime�
49 O Years prn
Prepare Animation vSheet R Input[. To All To Army
Log �"' Linear
DISSOLIIr�d GHLOFiINATEO suit vEm-r CDmc:ENTFtATium2s ALDIIIG PLUME CENTERLINE (i rrgtL) at Z=O
�.rao nageaaaton.P.oa..c tan �hp.a nl��i tit GSSef new y .r fi e.� Due_ rrc.s. 5 e._
7 .OlY7
J
EE o_7Cn
C
R
t7.o ]0
C
0
U
0001 "ter
Prepare Animation I
2900
Distance From Source (ft )
To -
-a.F.>9 7" R.tum to
u rip r,sxa�x
L-9 „fir. Sr.cr. „per
71aa PCE
a" TCE
See DCE
aaa VC
Ses ETN
35oo
To All To Ari>ry
DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mgfL) at Z=0
Monrtorin VYNI Locations R
Field Uat. rr4m Sitr
700 loco I
❑ ❑❑fl ❑ ❑03
1900
0 000
�Tfo F]egradalloNProdu tfon �Sequerr1 al iM IXtle[ CKe aJ r Fieltl Cute from Sib
1 -000
J
Sea PCE
i�
Saw TCE
0-100
See OCE I
v 0-010
See VC I
2900
o
See ET H I
0-001
+ I h
O 500
1000 1SOO 2000 2500 MOO 3WO
Distance From Source (ft.)
Prepare Animation
1 ime_
49.0 Years
Sheets R In to To All
Pit
To Array
Log
Log �JLinear
Date:
05/19/23
BIOCHLOR Model Output
Exhibit No.
Project ID:
4358-20-043D
October 2022 Data (49 Years)
III -A
II I E Prepared by:
EH
Moore County Landfill
Reviewed by:
T:\Greensboro-1580\Projects\2020\4358-20-043D Moore County Landfill\Task B - CAER Repo rt\BIOCHLOR-MCLF-2012\report exhibits-caer.xlsx

BIOCHLOR Natural Attenuati,on Decision Support System
Moore County LF
Data Input Instructions:
Versf-R 2 2
12022 Oct
115 - 1 Enter value of roc tly ..
Ewc.l 2000
Ran Name
T or _ 2. Calculalo by tillinn In gray
TYPE OF CHLORINATED SOLVENT:
S_ GENERAL
C:
002 cells. Press Eraser- than
Ethanes
Simulation Tfmu'
1170
(yr) T L
! 10 restore rormulas. hit'Restora Formulas- button I
7_ ADVECTION
Modeled Ara. Width'
1800
(it]
Venable.- - D.t. used di—tty in model.
Seepage V.lpcoy,
Vg
16S S (Fvyr)
MK`,00ie0 ^FOR 1 e09th-
Zone 7 LengV1'
Y900
2� •
Vt) L
CTt3
TBS1 II Natural MtonuBlAPn
Biotr.ns[ormalinn
Hydra ubc Conduchn[y
K
3.5E-03
[rm/srr:]
Lone 2 Length-
❑
(rt) ZMlfs 2-
1s O.—ri Screani n{� Protrxnl
HyAr®ullC Gradient
I
0_016
(lt/ft)
L - Zone 1
Effective Porosity
035
(•J
G_ SOURCE DATA
TYPEContinuous
Vertical Plan. Source: de[armw-re Source Well
Z. P[SPER SI4N
Source Options
Single Pt. nor /
Loca[r ri and [.put SnWant Concentrations
Alpha x'
16. f
CRj
Cale
(Alpha y) ! (Alpha x)-
7.6
(-)
Source Thickness in Sa[ Zone- 55 (m
(Alpha 2}! (Alplin tom'
8_E-01
-
Yl
3. ADSORPTION
_
_ _
J
Wltl[h' (Try 1tf00
R.I.rd.tion F..1.1'
- R
k.'
Cone_ m L ' Cl
7 r
-
Soil Bulc O9nslty. rho
1-7
(Stull-]
POE
.008
O
F raclionOrganic Carbon, foc
1.HE-3
(-)
TCE
.00r
O
Vlaw of Plumes LooWng Down
Partllion Gn=i1clant
PCE
Koe
4211
`�
{Llkg]
4-72
[-)
DOE
VC
015
.tk3
0
O
Observed CanFe dine Conc- at Monitoring Waft
TOE
73tl
(Llkg)
ETH
a
0
DCE
i25
(L/IW)
2.09
[-)
VC
3Q
(Lllcg]
7 _26
[-)
7_ FIELD DATA FOR COMPARISON
ETry
302
(Llkg)
3-fi+)
[-)
PCE Cone (riv L]
Common R (uNd in modN)' =
2.14
TCE Co..- (mglL)
4_ RIOTRANSFORMATON
-1 se Orbiiir o..a Co r?T liirge
C
PCE Conc. (m9/t-)
Zone 1
POE TCE
h 1/ !
O 138
E
natf-life Yreld
00 079
VG C[1nC- (ff/$l/L
ET" Conc.
TGE DGE
6.86e
7_OO d. 7+f
f1•slanc.3 Trram �r.e ice ;ff )
DCE �' VC
v 4S2
E--
1 .50 084
1 ]a1. note C:-nnectad
a(m J
VC ETH
5331
3.OQ 0.45
S- CHOOSE TYPE OF OUTPUT
TO
SEE:
ton. 2 �
PCE TCE
OCE
.L 7
❑ 139
F
E
_
heir-
5.00 .L
5 HELP
RUN
CENTERLINE
RUN AROCE
IJelp
R.sTareFEM
..vaa
VC
P as2
E
t.gq
3EE
P.sla
VC ETH
v-23T
F
3-00
—_
EIMSULVELP C"LOFi[NATEU SULMENT
CONCENTRATIONS ALONG F-LUME CENTERLINE [mytL] at 2-0
Diztanor [ram Sourer [Fit
— Nn paQ r�garonP.n•f •+. r e. •.
1 U❑C
E
O l OD
0010
V
0.001
a sao 1OOt]
�� aff+rnllet !!! E]rrler Llilra}•
t coo saoa asoo
Oista nct From Source trL]
3000
n ri111! ��! seas. fM
3500
Prepare Animation IUshcr_ • R 1nt}yt� To AI[ io array
Lop
RISSOLYEO CHLORINATE© SOLVENT CRNCENTRATIONS ALON[3 PLl1ME CENTERLINE [rngtL] at 2=0
No L]a araAalon•P rad�acron �£»q.�nrial f ar []Noy LYccay � �i3 0ra6. Rai. SM
t OOO t
O.11)[l
v
R
o.o to
C
0
c�
0001
6 SJJ 1 tillO
piste rice Frvm Source [ft ]
25f]0 3000 3500
SN VCE
Prepare Animation Rwtum
b+r]ca InputTp Alt To Arrey
Lvg L
OISSt7LY� CHLORINATED S©LYENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLt1ME CENTERLINE [mglL] a[ 2= V
�Hr3 bap raealon•P raO.icfon i...c i�='•• + . st �.fe• [.c ..r• r. Rdf pff.>, eem Sac
1.0430 r
C
O
7)
O AD1
O
21900
Prapa� Animation I
Distance FrvrTa Source (ft.)
iM PCE
sew TCE
see Dc>e< I
Sae VC I
Sea ETH
t0,7
) i'Nr Return to
uftipwbcl Ta AO To nrrey
Log [npert
DISSOLVED Gi-ILORINATEd SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALRN6 PLUME CEN-TERLINE [rnglL] at 2- 0
tom r
o.1m
0
p OD1v
4
V
O �Ol
6 Soo
case vice
29C)O
1rn•'i tSOv 2vvU 2soo 5606 3508
Distance
P Ansmation �� 3cN� rlpar!
Date: 05/19/23
Project ID: 4358-20-043D
Prepared by: EH
� Reviewed by:
From Source (ft_)
U riP rovers RMrm to To A!1 To Aira+y
S.ne.a. I FY'Ip'ut
BIOCHLOR Model Output Exhibit No.
October 2022 Date (100 years) III -A
Moore County Landfill
T:\Greensboro-1580\Projects\2020\4358-20-043D Moore County Landfill\Task B - CAER Repo rt\BIOCHLOR_MCLF_2012\report exhibits_caer.xlsx

Appendix IV - Time vs Concentration Charts

12.0
11.0
10.0
9.0
8.0
J 7.0
o�v
c
6.0
0
L
c 5.0
v
U
C
0
U
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
-1.0
Benzene Concentrations Over Time - Centerline #1
lD n n W M O O -1 N M M Ln LD LD f\ W M M O r-I N N M 'zl' Ln Ln W f\ W W M O -1 r-i N M 'zl' 'zl' Ln W f\ f\ M M O O c-1 N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
\ M M M M M M M \ \ \ M \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ D1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
N D1 lD N M N D1 W M N lD N lD M N 01 lD IN M W M IND1 WN D1 lD IN 0) lD M N D1 WIN M W0 M O -1 CD CD CD � 0 0 O -1 CD CD -10 O O O O O -1 O O O -i O O O r-i O O O -1 O O O -i O O O -1 O O O r-i O O
Sampling Dates
MW-15R MW-6 MW-11SR MW-11DR •••
TAG—b—1 58MPraj-ta12020435&20-M3D M-. County Landfil ml,B-CAER RW,d\Appendix IV_2022 Fall_2L Emaad—, Charta.bax
Power (MW-15R) ......• Power (MW-6) ......• Power (MW-11SR) Power (MW-11DR)

10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
on
c
0
+� 5.0
P
L
U
C
u 4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
Benzene Concentrations Over Time - Centerline #2
lD I� n 00 M O O -1 N M M Ln W W I, W M M O -1 N N M 'zl' Ln Ln W r, W W M O .--I r-i N M 'zl' 'zl' Ln W r, f\ W M O O c-1 N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
C-I C-I C) CD CDCD CD C) C) C) c C-I CD r-qC) r-qC) r-qC) r-qC) O o CD r-qC) r-qC) C) c) C-I C-I CD CD CD CD C-I C-I C-I C-I r-qC) r-qC) r-qC) c c c c r-qc) c) C) C-I O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
lD M N Q1 l0 M N 01 lD M N Q1 lD M N Q1 l0 M N 01 l0 M N Q1 l0 M N 01 lD M N Q1 lD M N 01 l0 M N 01 lD M N Q1 l0 M N 01 lD
Sampling Dates
MW-14 MW-165 MW-16D MW-17S MW-17D ......••• Power (MW-14) ......••• Power (MW-16S)
TAG—b—1 58MPraj-c U020435&20-M3D M-. County LandfilkTmkB -CAER RW,d\Appendix IV_2022 Fa11_2L Emee—, Charts.bsx

7.0
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
4.5
J
tio
4.0
c
c
0
+� 3.5
c
v
c 3.0
0
U
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Benzene Concentrations Over Time - Centerline #3
lD n n W M O O .1 N In m �* M LD lD n W O M O -1 N N m �* M M LD n W W M O -1 -1 N M V �* M Lo n n W O O O -1 N
Ol Ql Ql M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C-I C-I .1 .1 .1 r1 c-I C-I C-I .1 .1 .1 r4 N N N N N N N N N N N N N M ro ro n9
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
0 (D N C) 0 M N C) lD M N 0 l0 M N C1 lD M N 0 l0 CD N 01 LD M N 0 lD M N Cl l0 M N C) lD M N 0 0 CV)CD N C1 lD CO N 0 to
O O c-I O O O C-I O O O i--I O O O c-I O O O C-I O O O c-I O O O C-I O O O i--I O O O C-I O O O C-I O O O c-I O O O C-I O O
Sampling Dates
MW-7 MW-13SR MW-18 ......• Power(MW-7) ......• Power(MW-13SR)
TAG—b—1 58MP,.j-t U020435&20-M3D M-. County LandfilkTmk B - CAER RW,d\Appendix IV_2022 Fa11_2L Emee —, Charts.bsx

Benzene Concentrations Over Time - MSW Landfill Wells
12.0
11.5
11.0
10.5
10.0
9.5
9.0
8.5
8.0
7.5
J
tin
7.0
7
6.5
m
L
6.0
c:
5.5
v
0
5.0
v
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
-
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
...........
0.5
0.0
lD
I�
n
00
Ol
O
O
ci
N
M
M
M
lD
lD
I,
W
M
M
O
ci
N
N M M M
lD I,
M
W
M
O
.--I
ci
N
M
M
lD
I,
n
W
M
O
O
ci N
M
M
M
M
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
c-I
i--I
i--i
i--I r-i c-I c-I c-I
i--I i--i
i--I
r-i
�4
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
M M
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\ \ \ \ \
ci ci ci ci ci
\ \
ci ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\
ci
\ \
ci ci
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O O O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
\
lD
\
M
\
N
\
Cl
\
lD
\
M
\
N
M
C)
\
lD
M
M
\
N
\
Cl
\
lD
\
M
\
N
M
LD
lD
\
M
\
N
\
Cl
\
lD
\
M
\ \ \ \ \
N Cl lD M N
M \
C) lD
M
M
\
N
\
Cl
\
lD
\
M
\
N
\
C)
\
lD
\
M
\
N
\
Cl
\
lD
\
M
\
N
\
C1
\
lD
\
M
\
N
\ \
C) lD
O
O
i--I
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
a
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
N O O O N
O O
O
N
O
O
O
i--I
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
i--I
O
O
O
N
O O
Sampling Dates
MW-6 MW-7 MW-8 MW-9 MW-15R MW-14
......• Power (MW-6) ......• Power (MW-7) ......• Power (MW-8) ......• Power (MW-9) ......• Power (MW-15R) ......• Power (MW-14)
TAG—b—1 58MPraj-c U020435&20-M3D M-. County LandfilhTmkB -CAER RW,d\Appendix IV_2022 Fa11_2L Emee—, Charfs.bsx

10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
C
5.0
cLo • •.
C
v
U
C
v 4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
Benzene Concentrations Over Time - C&D Landfill Wells
VAVJMVJ
Mm I
0.0 9
N N N N N N N.
...... M M M
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
(D ci 0 a ci CD C3 CD 0 C) (D ci 0 C) (D ci 0 C) (D ci ci ci ci 0 C) (D CD 0 CD C3 ci 0 C) (D ci 0 C) (D ci 0 C) ci a ci ci ci 0 C)
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
O I, ItT .-i O n ItT r-i O n Rt -1 O n Rt r-i O n ItT .-i O I, Z3, r-4 O n -tl* r-4 O n Z3, r-4 O n Z3, r-4 O n Z3, r-4 O n Z31 r-i O n ItT r-i
Sampling Dates
MW-11SR MW-11DR MW-13SR MW-13DR MW-18
......• Power (MW-11SR) ......• Power (MW-11DR) ......• Power (MW-13SR) ......• Power (MW-13DR)
TAG-b-1 58MPraj-ta12020435&20-M3D M-ra County Landfil ml,B-CAER RW,d\Appendix IV_2022 Fall_2L Emaad-, Charfa.bax

29.0
27.0
25.0
23.0
21.0
19.0
--J 17.0
c 13.0
v
u
c
v 11.0
9.0
7.0
5.0
3.0
1.0
-1.0
Vinyl Chloride Concentrations Over Time - Centerline #1
M LD n n 00 M O -1 N N M V M l0 n n W M O ci N N M V M LD n n W M O -1 N N M �* M lD n n 00 O O -i N
M M Ql Ql M M O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N c-i c-i c-i c-i c-i c-i c-i r-i r-i N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
c-I c-I ci ci ci c-I ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci c-I ci ci ci c-I ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
l\D �* N N O 0000 t\D KT N N O 000 LD 'cT N N O 00 kD KT N N O 00 l\D �* N N O 000 l\D 'cT N N O 0000 t\D KT N N O 00 LD �* N
O O O 1-4 c-i O O O O -4 -4 O O O O -4 c-i O O O O c-i c-i O O O O -4 -4 O O O O -4 -4 O O O O c-i c-i O O O O
Sampling Dates
MW-15R MW-6 MW-11SR MW-11DR ......• Power(MW-15R) ......• Power(MW-6) ......• Power(MW-11SR) ......• Power(MW-11DR)
TAG—b—l5BMPraj-c U020435&20-M3D M-. County LandfilkTmk B -CAER RW,d\Appendix IV_2022 Fa11_2L Emee—, Charfs.bsx

Vinyl Chloride Concentrations Over Time - Centerline #2
39.0
37.0
35.0
33.0
31.0
29.0
27.0
25.0
23.0
c
21.0
0
a
19.0
4-
c
u
17.0
c
0
15.0
13.0
11.0
9.0
—
7.0
5.0
3.0
�.
1.0
••
...................................
...
-1.0
Ln
LD
n
n
00
M
O
-1
N
N
CO
V
Ln
l0
n
n
00
M
O
ci
N
N
M V M
LD
I,
n
W
O
O
-1
N
N
M
�*
M
lD
I,
n
00
O
O
-i
N
M
\
M
\
M
\
M
\
M
\
M
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
O
\
c-i
\
c-i
\
N
\
c-i
\
c-i N N
\ \ \
c-i
\
c-i
\
c-i
\
.--i
\
.--i
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
M
\
M
\
M
\
c-I
O
c-I
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
c-I
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci ci ci
O O O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
c-I
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
c-I
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
ci
O
l\D
O
O
N
O
N
-4
O
-4
W
O
t00
O
KT
O
N
O
N
-4
O
-4
W
O
LD
O
'cT
O
N
O
N
c-i
O
c-i
W
O
l\D
O
KT
O
N
O
N
c-i
O W l\D
c-i O O
O
N
O
N
c-i
O
r-q
W
O
l\D
O
'cT
O
N
O
N
-4
O
c-i
W
O
t00
O
KT
O
N
O
N
c-i
O
c-i
W
O
LD
O
O
N
O
Sampling Dates
MW-14
MW-16S
MW-16D
MW-17S
......•
Power(MW-14)
......•
Power(MW-16S)
TAG—b—l5BMPraj-c U020435&20-M3D M-. County LandfilkTmk B -CAER RW,d\Appendix IV_2022 Fa11_2L Emee—, Charts.bsx

25.0
23.0
21.0
19.0
17.0
Joao 15.0
c
9.0
7.0
5.0
3.0
1.0
-1.0
Vinyl Chloride Concentrations Over Time - Center Line #3
Ln kD kD n W M M O -1 N N M Z3, Ln Ln kD f\ W W M O c-I -i N M Ln kD n f\ W M O O c-I N M M Z31 Ln lD kD n W M M O r-I N
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N MMM
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
\ M \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
WM N 01 lD M N Q1 lD M N N lD M N 01 lD M N 01 lD M N Q1 lD M N 01 lD M N 01 lD M N 01 lD M N Q1 lD M N 01 lD M N Q1 lD M
Sampling Dates
MW-7 MW-13SR MW-13DR —MW-18 MW-19 ......• Power(MW-7) ......• Power(MW-13SR)
TAG-b-l5BMPraj-ta12020W35&20-M3D M-. County LandfilkTaak B - CAER RW,d\Appendix IV_2022 Fall_2L Emaadance Charta.bax

29.0
27.0
25.0
23.0
21.0
19.0
--J 17.0
c
15.0
0
M
9.0
7.0
5.0
3.0
1.0
-1.0
Vinyl Chloride Concentrations Over Time - Center Line #4
Ln lD lD n W M M O -1 N N M Z3, Ln Ln lD f\ W W M O c-I r-i N M Ln lD n f\ W M O O c-I N M M Z31 Ln lD lD n W M M O r-I N
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N MMM
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
\ M M M M M M M M M \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
lD M IN01 WIN M WN N lD M N Q1 WIN 01 WIN M lD N MW M N Q1 W M IN lD N Q1 lD N MWM N Q1 lD M
Sampling Dates
MW-8 -MW-3 ......• Power(MW-8)
TAG-b-l5BMPraj-ta12020W35&20-M3D M-. County Landfil ml,B-CAER RW,d\AppendixIV_2022 Fall_2L Emaadance Charta.bax

29.0
27.0
25.0
23.0
21.0
19.0
--J 17.0
c
15.0
0
M
9.0
7.0
5.0
3.0
1.0
-1.0
Vinyl Chloride Concentrations Over Time - Center Line #5
lD I� W Q1 M O �1 N N M '�T Ln Ln LD r� W W M O c 1 �i N M ItT zll Ln lD f\ n M M O O c-I N M M zll Ln lD LD I, M M M O r-I N
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N MMM
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
O I, ItT -1 O n ItT -1 O n ItT .-i O n zl* .--i O n zl* .--i O n zl* .--i O n zl* .--i O n zl* .--i O n zl* -i O n ItT -1 O n ItT -1 O n ItT r-i
Sampling Dates
MW-9 MW-2 ....... Power (MW-9) ....... Power (MW-2)
TAG—b—l5BMPraj-ta12020W35&20-M3D M-ra County Landfil ml,B-CAER RW,d\AppendixIV_2022 Fall_2L Emaadance Charta.bax

25.0
23.0
21.0
19.0
17.0
9.0
7.0
5.0
3.0
1.0
-1.0
Vinyl Chloride Concentrations Over Time - MSW Landfill Wells
Ln kD 9.0 r, W M M O -1 N N M 'zl' Ln Ln kD r, W M M O c-I r-i N M ItT Ln lD r, n W M O O c-I N M M zll Ln lD 9.0 n W M M O r-I N
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N MMM
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
0 c-I 0 0 (D 0 c-I 0 0 c-I 0 (D CD CD CD CD CD CD C-I 0 0 c-I 0 0 0 0 CD CD CD CD 0 CD
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
lD M N 01 kD M N O1 l0 M N 01 kD M N 01 l0 M N 01 lD M N 01 M
M N 01 W M N M M M N 01 WM INO1 MM N 01 lD M N O1 WCDO -1 O CD CD r-i CD CD r-1 CD CD CD r-i CD CD -1 CD CD CD -i CD0 O r-1 O O O r-i O O O -1 O O O -i O O O -1 O O O r-i O O O
Sampling Dates
MW-6 MW-7 MW-8 MW-9 MW-15R ......• Power (MW-6) •• Power (MW-8) Power (MW-9) ......• Power (MW-15R)
TAG-b-l5BMPraj-c U020435&20-M3D M-. County UndflINTwk B -CAER RW,d\AppendI, IV_2022 Fa11_2L Emee-, Charts.bsx

Appendix V - Mann -Kendall Statistics

• •
for Constituent Trend Analysis
Evaluation Date: 2-Jun-23
Job ID: MW-4
Facility Name: Moore County Landfll
Constituent: VC, 1,2-13CE, Benzene, 1,4-Dioxane
Conducted By: Ed Henriques
Concentration Units: ug/L
Sampling Point ID:
I Vinyl Chloride
cis-1,2 DCE Benzene I 1,4-Dioxane
1 [0111 •
ao
<0.3
<1
<1
<0.3
777
<1
<0.3
T5T
<1
<0.3
<1
<0.3
<1
<1
<0.3
<1
<1
<0.3
U.bu
<1
<0.3
<1
<1
<0.3
<1
<0.3
<1
<1
<0.3
<1
<1
<1
<0.3
<1
<1
1.6
<0.3
<1
<1
<1
<0.3
T5T
<1
<1
20
Coefficient of Variation:
Mann -Kendall Statistic (S):
i
Confidence Factor:
0'
Concentration Trend: . Trend
Stable Stable #N/A
10
♦Vinyl Chloride
fcis-1,2 DCE
J
—dr�Benzene
�
—*$-- 1,4-Dioxane
C
1
O01
M
c
d
t�
c
O
V
0.1
12/14 1LO19
09/17 02/19 06/20 10/21
Sampling Date
Notes:
1. At least four independent sampling events per well are required for calculating the trend. Methodology is valid for 4 to 40 samples.
2. Confidence in Trend = Confidence (in percent) that constituent concentration is increasing (S>0) or decreasing (S<0): >95% = Increasing or Decreasing;
z 90% = Probably Increasing or Probably Decreasing; < 90% and S>0 = No Trend; < 90%, S50, and COV z 1 = No Trend; < 90% and COV < 1 = Stable.
3. Methodology based on "MAROS: A Decision Support System for Optimizing Monitoring Plans", J.J. Aziz, M. Ling, H.S. Rifai, C.J. Newell, and J.R. Gonzales,
Ground Water, 41(3):355-367, 2003.
DISCLAIMER: The GSI Mann -Kendall Toolkit is available "as is". Considerable care has been exercised in preparing this software product; however, no party, including without
limitation GSI Environmental Inc., makes any representation or warranty regarding the accuracy, correctness, or completeness of the information contained herein, and no such
party shall be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, incidental or other damages resulting from the use of this product or the information contained herein. Information in
this publication is subject to change without notice. GSI Environmental Inc., disclaims any responsibility or obligation to update the information contained herein.
GSI Environmental Inc., www.gsi-netcom

TOOLKIT
for Constituent Trend Analysis
Evaluation Date: 2-Jun-23 Job ID: MW-6
Facility Name: Moore County Landfll Constituent: VC, 1,2-DCE, Benzene, 1,4-Dioxane
Conducted By: Ed Henriques Concentration Units: u /L
Sampling Point ID:J
Vinyl Chloride I cis-1,2 DCE Benzene I 1,4-Dioxane
•
<0.3
<0.3
—94707727-
<0.3
1.9
<0.3
2.5
<0.3
1.3
<0.3
1.3
<0.3
<0.3
20
Coefficient of Variation: r .
Mann -Kendall Statistic (S):
Confidence Factor:
Concentration Trend: Vecreasing Prob.
10 ♦Vinyl Chloride
fcis-1,2 DCE
JEL —dr�Benzene
4 —*$-- 1,4-Dioxane
7
C
O 1
rr
i
C
d
C
O
V
0.1
12114 09/17 02119 06120 10121
Sampling Date
Notes:
1. At least four independent sampling events per well are required for calculating the trend. Methodology is valid for 4 to 40 samples.
2. Confidence in Trend = Confidence (in percent) that constituent concentration is increasing (S>0) or decreasing (S<0): >95% = Increasing or Decreasing;
z 90% = Probably Increasing or Probably Decreasing; < 90% and S>0 = No Trend; < 90%, S50, and COV z 1 = No Trend; < 90% and COV < 1 = Stable.
3. Methodology based on "MAROS: A Decision Support System for Optimizing Monitoring Plans", J.J. Aziz, M. Ling, H.S. Rifai, C.J. Newell, and J.R. Gonzales,
Ground Water, 41(3):355-367, 2003.
DISCLAIMER: The GSI Mann -Kendall Toolkit is available "as is". Considerable care has been exercised in preparing this software product; however, no party, including without
limitation GSI Environmental Inc., makes any representation or warranty regarding the accuracy, correctness, or completeness of the information contained herein, and no such
party shall be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, incidental or other damages resulting from the use of this product or the information contained herein. Information in
this publication is subject to change without notice. GSI Environmental Inc., disclaims any responsibility or obligation to update the information contained herein.
GSI Environmental Inc., www.gsi-netcom

• •
for Constituent Trend Analysis
Evaluation Date: 2-Jun-23 Job ID: MW-7
Facility Name: Moore County Landfll Constituent: VC, 1,2-13CE, Benzene, 1,4-Dioxane
Conducted By: Ed Henriques Concentration Units: u /L
Sampling Point ID:J
Vinyl Chloride cis-1,2 DCE Benzene I 1,4-Dioxane
• • • •
<3
<1
<1
1.1
TT_
_9470777
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
4.0
<0.2
18
19
20
Coefficient of Variation:
r
Mann -Kendall Statistic (S):
Confidence Factor:
0'
Concentration Trend:
No Trend No Trend Decreasing #N/A
10
♦Vinyl Chloride
fcis-1,2 DCE
J
—��Benzene
�
�� 1,4-Dioxane
7
.i
C
r
l�4 Rbe
or N
C
d
V
C
O
U
0.1
12114 09/17 02119 06120 10121
Sampling Date
Notes:
1. At least four independent sampling events per well are required for calculating the trend. Methodology is valid for 4 to 40 samples.
2. Confidence in Trend = Confidence (in percent) that constituent concentration is increasing (S>0) or decreasing (S<0): >95% = Increasing or Decreasing;
z 90% = Probably Increasing or Probably Decreasing; < 90% and S>0 = No Trend; < 90%, S50, and COV z 1 = No Trend; < 90% and COV < 1 = Stable.
3. Methodology based on "MAROS: A Decision Support System for Optimizing Monitoring Plans", J.J. Aziz, M. Ling, H.S. Rifai, C.J. Newell, and J.R. Gonzales,
Ground Water, 41(3):355-367, 2003.
DISCLAIMER: The GSI Mann -Kendall Toolkit is available "as is". Considerable care has been exercised in preparing this software product; however, no party, including without
limitation GSI Environmental Inc., makes any representation or warranty regarding the accuracy, correctness, or completeness of the information contained herein, and no such
party shall be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, incidental or other damages resulting from the use of this product or the information contained herein. Information in
this publication is subject to change without notice. GSI Environmental Inc., disclaims any responsibility or obligation to update the information contained herein.
GSI Environmental Inc., www.gsi-netcom

TOOLKIT
for Constituent Trend Analysis
Evaluation Date: 2-Jun-23 Job ID: MW-9
Facility Name: Moore County Landfll Constituent: VC, 1,2-DCE, Benzene, 1,4-Dioxane
Conducted By: Ed Henriques Concentration Units: u /L
Sampling Point ID:
I Vinyl Chloride cis-1,2 DCE I Benzene I 1,4-Dioxane
• 6_01• •T
Mill
<0.2
U.bJ
<0.2
U.bU
<0.2
U.84
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
1.3
<0.2
<0.2
<1
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<1
<0.2
<1
<0.2
<1
3.1
18
20
Coefficient of Variation:
Mann -Kendall Statistic (S):
Confidence Factor:
0'
Concentration Trend:
Stable
♦Vinyl Chloride
fcis-1,2 DCE
—dr�Benzene
—11-1,4-Dioxane
10
c
O
2
M
C
d
v
C
O
IL
0A
12/14 05/ 09/17 02/19 16/20
Sampling Date
Notes:
1. At least four independent sampling events per well are required for calculating the trend. Methodology is valid for 4 to 40 samples.
2. Confidence in Trend = Confidence (in percent) that constituent concentration is increasing (S>0) or decreasing (S<0): >95% = Increasing or Decreasing;
z 90% = Probably Increasing or Probably Decreasing; < 90% and S>0 = No Trend; < 90%, S50, and COV z 1 = No Trend; < 90% and COV < 1 = Stable.
3. Methodology based on "MAROS: A Decision Support System for Optimizing Monitoring Plans", J.J. Aziz, M. Ling, H.S. Rifai, C.J. Newell, and J.R. Gonzales,
Ground Water, 41(3):355-367, 2003.
DISCLAIMER: The GSI Mann -Kendall Toolkit is available "as is". Considerable care has been exercised in preparing this software product; however, no party, including without
limitation GSI Environmental Inc., makes any representation or warranty regarding the accuracy, correctness, or completeness of the information contained herein, and no such
party shall be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, incidental or other damages resulting from the use of this product or the information contained herein. Information in
this publication is subject to change without notice. GSI Environmental Inc., disclaims any responsibility or obligation to update the information contained herein.
GSI Environmental Inc., www.gsi-netcom

TOOLKIT
for Constituent Trend Analysis
Evaluation Date: 2-Jun-23 Job ID: MW-14
Facility Name: Moore County Landfll Constituent: VC, 1,2-DCE, Benzene, 1,4-Dioxane
Conducted By: Ed Henriques Concentration Units: u /L
Sampling Point ID:
I Vinyl Chloride I cis-1,2 DCE I Benzene 1,4-Dioxane
• • • •
<1
<1
1.1
<1
<1
< 1.00
18
19
20
Coefficient of Variation:
Mann -Kendall Statistic (S):
Confidence Factor: O' 0'
Concentration Trend: Wtable
♦Vinyl Chloride
fcis-1,2 DCE
—dr�Benzene
—11-1,4-Dioxane
7
C
O
R
C
d
v
C
O
V
0.1
12114 09/17 02119 06120
Sampling Date
Notes:
1. At least four independent sampling events per well are required for calculating the trend. Methodology is valid for 4 to 40 samples.
2. Confidence in Trend = Confidence (in percent) that constituent concentration is increasing (S>0) or decreasing (S<0): >95% = Increasing or Decreasing;
z 90% = Probably Increasing or Probably Decreasing; < 90% and S>0 = No Trend; < 90%, S50, and COV z 1 = No Trend; < 90% and COV < 1 = Stable.
3. Methodology based on "MAROS: A Decision Support System for Optimizing Monitoring Plans", J.J. Aziz, M. Ling, H.S. Rifai, C.J. Newell, and J.R. Gonzales,
Ground Water, 41(3):355-367, 2003.
DISCLAIMER: The GSI Mann -Kendall Toolkit is available "as is". Considerable care has been exercised in preparing this software product; however, no party, including without
limitation GSI Environmental Inc., makes any representation or warranty regarding the accuracy, correctness, or completeness of the information contained herein, and no such
party shall be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, incidental or other damages resulting from the use of this product or the information contained herein. Information in
this publication is subject to change without notice. GSI Environmental Inc., disclaims any responsibility or obligation to update the information contained herein.
GSI Environmental Inc., www.gsi-netcom

TOOLKIT
for Constituent Trend Analysis
Evaluation Date: 2-Jun-23 Job ID: MW-15R
Facility Name: Moore County Landfll Constituent: VC, 1,2-DCE, Benzene, 1,4-Dioxane
Conducted By: Ed Henriques Concentration Units: u /L
Sampling Point ID:J
Vinyl Chloride I cis-1,2 DCE I Benzene I 1,4-Dioxane
• •
<0.2
. 42
r4.47
<0.2
<3
3.4
-TT/-TL7TT-
----U-.4T-
----T. T-7
<0.2
-
<1
<0.2
<1
<1
TT_
-94707727-
<0.2
<1
.
<1
<0.2
2.4
<1
<1
<0.2
<1
<1
<0.2
<1
20
Coefficient of Variation:
Mann -Kendall Statistic (S):
Confidence Factor: ' , 73.7% 100.0% 54.0%
Concentration Trend: No Trend Decreasing #N/A
10 tVinyl Chloride
fcis-1,2 DCE
J Benzene
�—N-1,4-Dioxane
7
C
O 1
rr
i
r•+
C
d
C
O
V
0.1
12114 09/17 02119 06120 10121
Sampling Date
Notes:
1. At least four independent sampling events per well are required for calculating the trend. Methodology is valid for 4 to 40 samples.
2. Confidence in Trend = Confidence (in percent) that constituent concentration is increasing (S>0) or decreasing (S<0): >95% = Increasing or Decreasing;
z 90% = Probably Increasing or Probably Decreasing; < 90% and S>0 = No Trend; < 90%, S50, and COV z 1 = No Trend; < 90% and COV < 1 = Stable.
3. Methodology based on "MAROS: A Decision Support System for Optimizing Monitoring Plans", J.J. Aziz, M. Ling, H.S. Rifai, C.J. Newell, and J.R. Gonzales,
Ground Water, 41(3):355-367, 2003.
DISCLAIMER: The GSI Mann -Kendall Toolkit is available "as is". Considerable care has been exercised in preparing this software product; however, no party, including without
limitation GSI Environmental Inc., makes any representation or warranty regarding the accuracy, correctness, or completeness of the information contained herein, and no such
party shall be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, incidental or other damages resulting from the use of this product or the information contained herein. Information in
this publication is subject to change without notice. GSI Environmental Inc., disclaims any responsibility or obligation to update the information contained herein.
GSI Environmental Inc., www.gsi-netcom

TOOLKIT
for Constituent Trend Analysis
Evaluation Date: 2-Jun-23 Job ID: MW-11SR
Facility Name: Moore County Landfll Constituent: VC, 1,2-13CE, Benzene, 1,4-Dioxane
Conducted By: Ed Henriques Concentration Units: u /L
Sampling Point ID:J
Vinyl Chloride cis-1,2 DCE Benzene 1,4-Dioxane
�• • OR
<1
<1
<1
5.1
< 1.00
20
Coefficient of Variation:
Mann -Kendall Statistic (S):
Confidence Factor:
93.0%
Concentration Trend:
Prob.
10
♦Vinyl Chloride
fcis-1,2 DCE
J
—dr�Benzene
�
—m— 1,4-Dioxane
7
C
O 1
rr
r
C
d
C
O
V
0.1
12114 0511 09117 02119 06120 10/21
Sampling Date IMM
Notes:
1. At least four independent sampling events per well are required for calculating the trend. Methodology is valid for 4 to 40 samples.
2. Confidence in Trend = Confidence (in percent) that constituent concentration is increasing (S>0) or decreasing (S<0): >95% = Increasing or Decreasing;
z 90% = Probably Increasing or Probably Decreasing; < 90% and S>0 = No Trend; < 90%, S50, and COV z 1 = No Trend; < 90% and COV < 1 = Stable.
3. Methodology based on "MAROS: A Decision Support System for Optimizing Monitoring Plans", J.J. Aziz, M. Ling, H.S. Rifai, C.J. Newell, and J.R. Gonzales,
Ground Water, 41(3):355-367, 2003.
DISCLAIMER: The GSI Mann -Kendall Toolkit is available "as is". Considerable care has been exercised in preparing this software product; however, no party, including without
limitation GSI Environmental Inc., makes any representation or warranty regarding the accuracy, correctness, or completeness of the information contained herein, and no such
party shall be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, incidental or other damages resulting from the use of this product or the information contained herein. Information in
this publication is subject to change without notice. GSI Environmental Inc., disclaims any responsibility or obligation to update the information contained herein.
GSI Environmental Inc., www.gsi-netcom

TOOLKIT
for Constituent Trend Analysis
MW
Evaluation Date: 2-Jun-23 b DV-11DR
C2-DCE, Benzene, 1,4-DioxaneFacility Name: Moore County Landfll n
Conducted By: Ed Henriques Concentration Units: u /L
Sampling Point ID:
I Vinyl Chloride I cis-1,2 DCE Benzene I 1,4-Dioxane
• 1010 011 • IN I I VA 1101
<1
I.b
<2
<0.3
-
18
19
20
Coefficient of Variation: r
Mann -Kendall Statistic (S):
Confidence Factor:
Concentration Trend: Vecreasing Decreasing No Trend Decreasing
♦Vinyl Chloride
fcis-1,2 DCE
—dr�Benzene
—11-1,4-Dioxane
7
C
O
C
d OF
v
C
O
V
0.1
12/14 0511 09/17 02119 06120
Sampling Date
Notes:
1. At least four independent sampling events per well are required for calculating the trend. Methodology is valid for 4 to 40 samples.
2. Confidence in Trend = Confidence (in percent) that constituent concentration is increasing (S>0) or decreasing (S<0): >95% = Increasing or Decreasing;
z 90% = Probably Increasing or Probably Decreasing; < 90% and S>0 = No Trend; < 90%, S50, and COV z 1 = No Trend; < 90% and COV < 1 = Stable.
3. Methodology based on "MAROS: A Decision Support System for Optimizing Monitoring Plans", J.J. Aziz, M. Ling, H.S. Rifai, C.J. Newell, and J.R. Gonzales,
Ground Water, 41(3):355-367, 2003.
DISCLAIMER: The GSI Mann -Kendall Toolkit is available "as is". Considerable care has been exercised in preparing this software product; however, no party, including without
limitation GSI Environmental Inc., makes any representation or warranty regarding the accuracy, correctness, or completeness of the information contained herein, and no such
party shall be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, incidental or other damages resulting from the use of this product or the information contained herein. Information in
this publication is subject to change without notice. GSI Environmental Inc., disclaims any responsibility or obligation to update the information contained herein.
GSI Environmental Inc., www.gsi-netcom

TOOLKIT
for Constituent Trend Analysis
Evaluation Date: 2-Jun-23 Job ID: MW-13SR
Facility Name: Moore County Landfll Constituent: VC, 1,2-13CE, Benzene, 1,4-Dioxane
Conducted By: Ed Henriques Concentration Units: u /L
Sampling Point ID:J
Vinyl Chloride cis-1,2 DCE Benzene I 1,4-Dioxane
�.mow
<0.2
<0.2
TUT
< 1
5
12112117
0.4T—
____T_9__
U. 647
<0.2
<3
<1
<0.2
UAU
<1
1.8
<0.2
U.b2
<1
1.5
<0.2
<1
<0.2
<1
<1
<0.2
U.1b
<1
<0.2
1
<1
<0.2
<1
<1
tUs
5
<0.2
1.2
<0.54
7
20
Coefficient of Variation:
Mann -Kendall Statistic (S):
Confidence Factor:
0'
Concentration Trend:
Stable Decreasing Increasing
10
♦Vinyl Chloride
fcis-1,2 DCE
Pk-
J
—dr�Benzene
�
—*$-- 1,4-Dioxane
7
C
r
l�4
rr
C
d
V
C
OUN
ci
0.1
12114 17 02119 06120 10121
1
Sampling Date
M
Notes:
1. At least four independent sampling events per well are required for calculating the trend. Methodology is valid for 4 to 40 samples.
2. Confidence in Trend = Confidence (in percent) that constituent concentration is increasing (S>0) or decreasing (S<0): >95% = Increasing or Decreasing;
z 90% = Probably Increasing or Probably Decreasing; < 90% and S>0 = No Trend; < 90%, S50, and COV z 1 = No Trend; < 90% and COV < 1 = Stable.
3. Methodology based on "MAROS: A Decision Support System for Optimizing Monitoring Plans", J.J. Aziz, M. Ling, H.S. Rifai, C.J. Newell, and J.R. Gonzales,
Ground Water, 41(3):355-367, 2003.
DISCLAIMER: The GSI Mann -Kendall Toolkit is available "as is". Considerable care has been exercised in preparing this software product; however, no party, including without
limitation GSI Environmental Inc., makes any representation or warranty regarding the accuracy, correctness, or completeness of the information contained herein, and no such
party shall be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, incidental or other damages resulting from the use of this product or the information contained herein. Information in
this publication is subject to change without notice. GSI Environmental Inc., disclaims any responsibility or obligation to update the information contained herein.
GSI Environmental Inc., www.gsi-netcom

TOOLKIT
for Constituent Trend Analysis
Evaluation Date: 2-Jun-23 Job ID: MW-13DR
Facility Name: Moore County Landfll Constituent: VC, 1,2-13CE, Benzene, 1,4-Dioxane
Conducted By: Ed Henriques Concentration Units: u /L
Sampling Point ID:J
Vinyl Chloride cis-1,2 DCE Benzene I 1,4-Dioxane
1 •
• •
au
<0.3 I.b <1
<0.3
<1
7
<0.3
<1
<0.3
<1
#N/A
<0.3
<1
<0.3
<3
<1
<0.3
.
<0.3
<1
4.6
<0.3
U.11
<1
<0.3
<1
<1
<0.3
<1
2.5
TT_
_94777
<0.3
U.1b
<1
<0.3
<1
<1
3.3
<0.3
<1
<1
4.2
<0.3
U.bo
<1
20
Coefficient of Variation:
Mann -Kendall Statistic (S):
Confidence Factor: s ' , 99.6% 52.0% 1 50.0%
Concentration Trend: Decreasing No Trend #N/A
10 ♦Vinyl Chloride
fci s-1,2 DCE
dw, Be
J—�nzene
Dioxane
7
C
0 1
rr
r
C
d
C
o
V
0.1
12114 0511 09117 02119 06120 10121
Sampling Date
Notes:
1. At least four independent sampling events per well are required for calculating the trend. Methodology is valid for 4 to 40 samples.
2. Confidence in Trend = Confidence (in percent) that constituent concentration is increasing (S>0) or decreasing (S<0): >95% = Increasing or Decreasing;
z 90% = Probably Increasing or Probably Decreasing; < 90% and S>0 = No Trend; < 90%, S50, and COV z 1 = No Trend; < 90% and COV < 1 = Stable.
3. Methodology based on "MAROS: A Decision Support System for Optimizing Monitoring Plans", J.J. Aziz, M. Ling, H.S. Rifai, C.J. Newell, and J.R. Gonzales,
Ground Water, 41(3):355-367, 2003.
DISCLAIMER: The GSI Mann -Kendall Toolkit is available "as is". Considerable care has been exercised in preparing this software product; however, no party, including without
limitation GSI Environmental Inc., makes any representation or warranty regarding the accuracy, correctness, or completeness of the information contained herein, and no such
party shall be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, incidental or other damages resulting from the use of this product or the information contained herein. Information in
this publication is subject to change without notice. GSI Environmental Inc., disclaims any responsibility or obligation to update the information contained herein.
GSI Environmental Inc., www.gsi-netcom

TOOLKIT
for Constituent Trend Analysis
MW
Evaluation Date: 2-Jun-23 b DV-18
C1,2 -DCE, Benzene, 1,4-DioxaneFacility Name: Moore County Landfll n
Conducted By: Ed Henriques Concentration Units: u /L
Sampling Point ID:
I Vinyl Chloride cis-1,2 DCE Benzene 1,4-Dioxane
• . • •
<1
<0.3
19
20
Coefficient of Variation: r
Mann -Kendall Statistic (S):
Confidence Factor:
Concentration Trend: Vecreasing Decreasing Decreasing Stable
♦Vinyl Chloride
fcis-1,2 DCE
4%7
—�—Benzene
jE ��1,4-Dioxane
c
O
M
L
= 1
d
tt —
O
V
0.1
12/19 07121 02122 08122
UL
JUL/21
Sampling Date
Notes:
1. At least four independent sampling events per well are required for calculating the trend. Methodology is valid for 4 to 40 samples.
2. Confidence in Trend = Confidence (in percent) that constituent concentration is increasing (S>0) or decreasing (S<0): >95% = Increasing or Decreasing;
z 90% = Probably Increasing or Probably Decreasing; < 90% and S>0 = No Trend; < 90%, S50, and COV z 1 = No Trend; < 90% and COV < 1 = Stable.
3. Methodology based on "MAROS: A Decision Support System for Optimizing Monitoring Plans", J.J. Aziz, M. Ling, H.S. Rifai, C.J. Newell, and J.R. Gonzales,
Ground Water, 41(3):355-367, 2003.
DISCLAIMER: The GSI Mann -Kendall Toolkit is available "as is". Considerable care has been exercised in preparing this software product; however, no party, including without
limitation GSI Environmental Inc., makes any representation or warranty regarding the accuracy, correctness, or completeness of the information contained herein, and no such
party shall be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, incidental or other damages resulting from the use of this product or the information contained herein. Information in
this publication is subject to change without notice. GSI Environmental Inc., disclaims any responsibility or obligation to update the information contained herein.
GSI Environmental Inc., www.gsi-netcom

TOOLKIT
for Constituent Trend Analysis
Evaluation Date: 2-Jun-23 Job ID: MW-19
Facility Name: Moore County Landfll Constituent: VC, 1,2-13CE, Benzene, 1,4-Dioxane
Conducted By: Ed Henriques Concentration Units: ug/L
Sampling Point ID:
Vinyl Chloride cis-1,2 DCE Benzene 1,4-Dioxane
1 • • •
<0.2
<1
<1
7—
—T4TT372T-
<1
<0.2
<1
<1
<0.2
<1
<1
<0.2
<1
<1
1.9
19
20
Coefficient of Variation: r .
Mann -Kendall Statistic (S): • -
Confidence Factor:
Concentration Trend: Wtable
10 ♦Vinyl Chloride
fcis-1,2 DCE
J0.00 enzene
1,4-Dioxane
C
O 1
c
d
t�
c
O
V
06120 09/20 01121 04121 07/21 10121 02122 05122 08122
EL Sampling Date
Notes:
1. At least four independent sampling events per well are required for calculating the trend. Methodology is valid for 4 to 40 samples.
2. Confidence in Trend = Confidence (in percent) that constituent concentration is increasing (S>0) or decreasing (S<0): >95% = Increasing or Decreasing;
z 90% = Probably Increasing or Probably Decreasing; < 90% and S>0 = No Trend; < 90%, S50, and COV z 1 = No Trend; < 90% and COV < 1 = Stable.
3. Methodology based on "MAROS: A Decision Support System for Optimizing Monitoring Plans", J.J. Aziz, M. Ling, H.S. Rifai, C.J. Newell, and J.R. Gonzales,
Ground Water, 41(3):355-367, 2003.
DISCLAIMER: The GSI Mann -Kendall Toolkit is available "as is". Considerable care has been exercised in preparing this software product; however, no party, including without
limitation GSI Environmental Inc., makes any representation or warranty regarding the accuracy, correctness, or completeness of the information contained herein, and no such
party shall be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, incidental or other damages resulting from the use of this product or the information contained herein. Information in
this publication is subject to change without notice. GSI Environmental Inc., disclaims any responsibility or obligation to update the information contained herein.
GSI Environmental Inc., www.gsi-netcom