Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9809_WilsonCDLF_reviewcomments_20220628Wilson, Donna J From: Wilson, Donna J Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2022 9:10 AM To: Michael Brinchek (mike@smithgardnerinc.com) Cc: Stanley, Sherri; Ritter, Christine; College, John H Subject: Wilson County C&D Landfill, Area 2 PTC comments, 9809-CDLF-2004 I've completed review of the PTC application for the Wilson County C&D Landfill. Below are the complete comments, including my earlier preliminary comments. Some of the comments have been already addressed. 1. Provide a cover sheet for the Permit to Construct application, table of contents, and executive summary. 2. All portions of the application, other than the Siting location restrictions for Area 2, should apply to and include both Area 1 and Area 2 (e.g., Facility Plan, Operating Plan, Closure plan, etc.). The cover sheets of these different sections should state "Areas 1 and 2." This includes tables and volumes. 3. Asbestos waste disposal must be within the permitted C&D landfill footprint. Provide information on the history of operation of the separate asbestos disposal area. 4. The onsite LCID landfill will need to meet the new LCID rules. Existing LCIDs are required to meet the new rules or close by Jan. 1, 2026. 5. Facility Plan: a. Table 1, Capacity — The table should confirm that the gross capacity represents the volume from the bottom of waste to the top of the final cover. Same comment for the Closure Plan. b. Provide a drawing that incorporates the buffer distances to the property line, residences, surface, water, and wells. Show the closest residences and well on the drawing. c. Section 7 — Settlement. Is the required 4 foot separation distance, post -settlement, to the seasonal high groundwater table met, considering the maximum 1.5 foot calculated settlement? Add specific information for this in the text. d. The traffic study and environmental impact study should be discussed in this section, per the new rules changes, and a reference to their location in the application. e. Tear -off shingle recycling is mentioned. If this is still in operation, it should be marked on a map, the approved plan and letter from Dec. 2012 should be included in an appendix, or it should be updated as necessary. 6. Technical specs - Site preparation - Specify the maximum storage time of concrete, pipes, etc. that will be removed during land clearing. Or address this in another section of the report. 7. Technical specs and CQA — The standards and requirements of the top 2 feet of the subgrade are not adequately covered. This should be addressed for both in -place and constructed subgrade. It appears that the discussion of the constructed subgrade is included in the Embankment sections, and these sections allow soil types not approved for the landfill subgrade (for example, SP). The standards for the landfill subgrade are specific to the rules, whereas other embankment construction does not have these standards. 8. Appendix A of the Facility Plan —The Final Cover Infiltration Analysis summary does not show that infiltration of the alternate final cover is less than the regulatory final cover. 9. CQA — Section 2.6 —The Final CQA report must contain the statement by the project engineer that construction was completed in accordance with the CQA plan, the conditions of the permit to construct, and the requirements of NC Solid Waste Rule 15A NCAC 13B .0541. 10. Final cover — The text description (Facility Plan and elsewhere) should include the side slope final cover with the 12-inch intermediate cover below. 11. Drawings: a. Final cover side slope detail should include both the 24 inch soil layer and the 12 inch intermediate layer. b. Provide a detail drawing of the alternative gas vent that is not drilled. c. As noted in the Facility Plan, the existing borrow area is shown on figure S1. The borrow area location should be clarified on the drawing. d. Show the locations of the waste tire, scrap metal, white goods, and shingle recycling areas on Drawing S1. 12. Provide status of the Stormwater and Erosion & Sedimentation Control permits. 13. Operating Plan: a. Section 3.1.2 - Describe methods to prevent leachate from the active face from entering the stormwater features, for example, the placement of a soil berm at the base of the active slope. b. Describe methods for compliance with windblown litter/waste, Rule .0542 (g). At the conclusion of each operating day, all windblown material resulting from the operation shall be collected and disposed of by the owner or operator. 14. Water quality monitoring plan — Why are wells 2 and 5 proposed within the landfill footprint, requiring future abandonment, instead of outside the landfill footprint? It appears that areas downgradient of Phase 2 are not represented in monitoring, based on the potentiometric surface maps. Please clarify. 15. Landfill gas monitoring plan —The closest residences should be added to this map, on Heather Ct. and Buck Branch Cr. Monitoring points are needed in direct line with the closest residences, unless otherwise dictated by geologic materials for probable gas migration. 16. Closure costs — It should be stated that it is based on the largest area requiring closure at any given time. This would be the area requested to be approved for the next PTO (or all future areas), and all areas containing waste that are not closed. Provide a note indicating what the 8.1 acres listed consists of. If it is intended to be Phases 1 and 2, it would be 9.1 acres. DHE rr�rif�wur�ra «.Nlw� DonnaJ" Wilson Engineering Project Vfanager' .Solid Pv'aste .Section Division of MasteManagement North Caroli_ua Department of Environmental Quality, 919-707-8255 (Office) D0nna.1Vi1SGn,dAcdenr_ goy" Physical Address: 217 West Jones Street, Raleigh SIC 27603 _flailing address: 1646 Dail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 Emad CWesporX14nelaaOfru.T iPl ajjfe':� F'i€..L: Ji'LL i'J La,-. iv'j