CCB0057_Nash_SwiftCreek_StructuralFill_Nov2021GW_FID1648935_20220310

Water Quality Monitoring Report - November
2021
Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill — CCB0057
Battieboro, Nash County
North Carolina
Chris Means,
Project Manager
ERM NC, Inc.
303 West Summit Avenue
Suite 330
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
Phone: [phone]
D Copyright 2022 by LRM worldwide Group Ltd and f or its affiliates (-ERM').
All rights reserved. No part or this work may he reproduced or transmitted in any form,
or by any means, without the prior written permission of ERM
1
' ENSE°
Brian Wilson, P.G. 7
Principal -in -Charge SEAL
2272 '-
I.aG�g 5Qa'�`
www.erm.com Version. 1.0 Project No.. 0397281 Client: Reuse Technology March 9, 2022

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT — NOVEMBER 2021
Battleboro, Nash County
CONTENTS
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION AND SITE HISTORY.............................................................................................1
1.1 Introduction...........................................................................................................................................1
1.2 Summary of Site Environmental History and Corrective Action............................................................1
2. CONCEPTUAL SITI MODEL............................................................................................................3
2.1 Hydrogeology........................................................................................................................................3
2.2 Contaminant Fate and Transport..........................................................................................................3
3. WATER QUALITY MONITORING ACTIVITIES................................................................................4
3.1 Objectives.............................................................................................................................................4
3.2 Monitoring Methods..............................................................................................................................5
4. MONITORING RESULTS......................................................................................................6
4.1 Groundwater Monitoring Results..........................................................................................................6
4.2 Surface Water Monitoring Results........................................................................................................8
4.3 Laboratory Data Quality Analysis..........................................................................................................8
5. SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................................9
APPENDIX A HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER RESULTS
APPENDIX B FIELD SHEETS
APPENDIX C LABORATORY DATA
List of Figures
Figure1 Site Location Map..................................................................................................................
Figure 2 Site Map and Monitor Well Locations....................................................................................
Figure 3 Shallow Groundwater Potentiometric Map — November 2021...............................................
Figure 4 Groundwater Analyses - Constituents Exceeding 2L Groundwater Standards — November
2021.......................................................................................................................................
Figure 5 Groundwater Analyses — Sulfate — Surficial Aquifer..............................................................
Figure 6 Hydrogeologic Profile A-A......................................................................................................
Figure 7 Sulfate Concentrations over Time — Selected Monitor Wells ................................................
List of Tables
Table 1
Monitor Well Construction Data Summary .........................
Table 2
Historical Groundwater Elevation Data ..............................
Table 3
Groundwater and Surface Water Analytical Event Results
Table 4
Groundwater and Surface Water Field Parameter Results
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology January 19, 2022 Page i

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT— NOVEMBER 2021 INTRODUCTION AND SITE HISTORY
Battleboro, Nash County
INTRODUCTION AND SITE HISTORY
1.1 Introduction
On behalf of ReUse Technology, Inc. (ReUse), ERM NC, Inc. (ERM) has prepared this Water Quality
Monitoring Report to summarize corrective action activities conducted for the Swift Creek Coal
Combustion By -Products (CCBs) Structural Fill site (CCB-0057) located along U.S. Highway 301 north of
Battleboro, Nash County, North Carolina, (hereafter called the "Site" or "subject property"). Corrective
actions have been implemented at the Site to address groundwater quality impacts in accordance with
the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) (ERM, February 27, 2015) approved by the North Carolina Department
of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) on March 12, 2015. The corrective actions were implemented in 2017
and included temporary removal of CCB materials to allow raising the floor elevation above the seasonal
high groundwater table, placing the CCB materials on the raised floor in a reduced footprint, installation of
a synthetic liner (cap) over the limits of the CCBs, and drainage improvements to minimize rainfall
infiltration. Groundwater and surface water monitoring activities presented herein are being conducted at
the Site to monitor the effectiveness of the previously completed corrective actions. The Site location is
shown in Figure 1. A Site map is included as Figure 2.
1.2 Summary of Site Environmental History and Corrective Action
The Site consists of a 25-acre property in northeast Nash County bounded by US Highway 301 to the
west, Lane Swamp to the north and east, and Swift Creek to the south. The area surrounding the Site is
comprised of sparsely populated agricultural land and partially wooded land. In December 1991, the
Solid Waste Section approved a proposed plan submitted by ReUse to use CCBs as structural fill
material in the development of the 25 acres as a commercial property. In September 1992, ReUse began
placement of CCBs as beneficial use fill at the Site. In January 2003, the last shipment of CCBs was
accepted at the Site. In March 2003, the Site had been graded, compacted, covered with an 18-inch soil
cap and planted with grass seed. In December 2003, Full Circle Solutions, Inc. purchased the business
assets of ReUse Technology, Inc., including the Swift Creek Site. According to records of Full Circle
Solutions, Inc., a total of approximately 134,000 tons of CCBs were placed at the Site. On November 4,
2004, the Closure Notice was forwarded to the Solid Waste Section.
In August 2004, Sherrill Environmental, Inc. reported the results of groundwater monitoring at four newly
installed monitoring wells (MW-1 S/MW-1 D, MW-2S/MW-2D) at the Site. Lead and sulfate were detected
at concentrations above the respective North Carolina 2L groundwater standards in the shallow
groundwater on the east side of the CCB fill. In October 2004, the Solid Waste Section required an
assessment by ReUse to determine the extent of the groundwater impact resulting from the placement of
CCBs at the Site. In March 2006, a Comprehensive Site Assessment for the Swift Creek Project was
submitted to the Solid Waste Section that included the results of an expanded groundwater and surface
water assessment. In September 2006, a Compliance Order was issued by the Solid Waste Section to
ReUse. In December 2006, pursuant to the Compliance Order, an Assessment Monitoring Plan and a
Swift Creek Dewatering Analysis were submitted to the Solid Waste Section. The Assessment Monitoring
Plan described a proposed groundwater and surface water monitoring program for the Site. The Swift
Creek Dewatering Analysis described a proposed dewatering subsurface drain along the western
boundary of the fill along US Highway 301 to remove water from the coal ash fill and lower the local
groundwater table to provide a required minimum 1-foot vertical separation between coal ash and
seasonal high groundwater elevations. The Assessment Monitoring Plan was approved by the Solid
Waste Section in February 2007. The Swift Creek Dewatering Analysis was conditionally approved by the
Solid Waste Section in July 2007 based on the performance of the proposed dewatering plan.
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology January 19, 2022 Page 1

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT— NOVEMBER 2021 INTRODUCTION AND SITE HISTORY
Battleboro, Nash County
In January 2008, a dewatering subsurface drain was installed consisting of a 6-inch polyvinyl chloride
(PVC) drain pipe along the western boundary of the fill along US Highway 301. The drain was designed to
lower the local groundwater table to provide a required minimum 1-foot vertical separation between coal
ash and seasonal high groundwater elevations. Groundwater collected in the pipe was transmitted by
gravity flow to an outfall box located at the north end of the Site at Lane Swamp.
The groundwater and surface water monitoring program was initiated at the Site in October 2007 in
accordance with the Assessment Monitoring Plan. The program consisted of semi-annual sampling and
laboratory analytical testing for metals and sulfates at eight (8) groundwater monitoring well locations and
three (3) surface water monitoring locations. Groundwater levels were also measured in the monitoring
wells and piezometers in order to evaluate ground water flow direction and determine water levels relative
to the CCB fill. The reported results of the groundwater monitoring from 2007 to 2014 confirmed
groundwater quality impacts including concentrations of sulfate, arsenic and lead at levels above the
respective North Carolina 2L groundwater standards. The monitoring reported no impacts to surface
water quality in Lane Swamp or Swift Creek adjacent to the facility.
The Division of Waste Management issued a "Warning Notice" to Full Circle Solutions and ReUse dated
May 16, 2014. The notice stated that the required groundwater vertical separation between filled CCBs
and seasonal high groundwater elevations had not been achieved and exceedances of the North Carolina
2L groundwater standards had been routinely reported. As a result, a "Groundwater Corrective Action
Application" was required to be submitted for approval.
On behalf of Full Circle Solutions and ReUse, ERM NC, Inc. (ERM) submitted a Corrective Action
Application, dated October 16, 2014, to the Division of Waste Management for approval. The Corrective
Action Application proposed the construction of a synthetic liner (cap) and drainage improvements as
corrective actions to significantly reduce or eliminate rainfall infiltration and leachate generation from the
beneficial fill. Two contingency corrective actions also were identified. The Division issued approval in
December 2014 and requested the submittal of a detailed Corrective Action Plan (CAP) to the Solid
Waste Section.
The Corrective Action Plan was submitted in February 2015 and approved by the NCDEQ Solid Waste
Section in March 2015. The Corrective Action Plan was designed to raise existing CCBs to above
historically high groundwater levels to prevent the leaching of contaminants of concern from the existing
CCBs. The CAP included the installation of a protective liner system, cover soil layer, and drainage
outlets to prevent infiltration of precipitation into the CCBs to assist in the prevention of leaching. The
footprint of the limits of ash was condensed from approximately 10 acres to 5 acres, reducing the
effective infiltration area. Implementation of the CAP was delayed approximately one year in 2015-2016
due to a North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) project to realign US Highway 301, along
with bridge replacements across Swift Creek. The corrective measures began on April 24, 2017 and
were completed on January 12, 2018.
In June 2018, two new monitoring wells, MW-5RS and MW-5RD, were installed as replacements for
former upgradient wells MW-5S and MW-5D, which were abandoned in 2015 by the NCDOT as part of
the Highway 301 realignment project. The new wells were located hydraulically upgradient (west) of the
Site on the west side of Highway 301 (see Figure 2) to monitor background water quality in the surficial
aquifer (MW-5RS) and deep aquifer (MW-5RD) zones. The monitoring wells were installed under an
NCDOT right-of-way encroachment agreement (E-0420981800025).
In accordance with the CAP, a performance monitoring and reporting plan was implemented in 2018 to
monitor the effectiveness of the corrective action. The elements of the performance monitoring plan
include:
■ Semi-annual groundwater and surface water monitoring and reporting,
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology January 19, 2022 Page 2

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT— NOVEMBER 2021 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
Battleboro, Nash County
■ Quarterly inspection and reporting of the Site for cap structural integrity, erosion control, proper
drainage, etc., and
■ Corrective Action Effectiveness Reports prepared every five years to evaluate and document a
reduction in contaminant concentrations in groundwater and a stable or decreasing plume extent.
2. CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
2.1 Hydrogeology
The following updated conceptual site model (CSM) has been developed based on the corrective action
and monitoring work performed by ERM, as well as previous site investigation activities performed by
others.
The Site is located in the Coastal Plain physiographic province of North Carolina. The Site surficial
geology consists of alluvial terrace deposits consisting of layers and mixtures of silts, clay, sands and
gravels. The alluvial deposits at the Site range in thickness from approximately 8 to 16 feet. The shallow
ground water at the Site occurs in the alluvial deposits and is referred to as the surficial or alluvial aquifer.
The alluvial aquifer sands are of low to moderate permeability (average hydraulic conductivity 0.67
feet/day). Within the alluvial aquifer zone, a yellowish -brown clay layer was encountered in the majority
of the borings for monitoring wells and piezometers installed at the Site. The clay layer of the alluvial
aquifer at the Site is approximately 1 to 4 feet thick and has a low permeability (average hydraulic
conductivity 0.002 feet/day). The clayey layer behaves as a confining layer or perching layer, which
appears to limit the vertical migration of contaminants at the Site. On the west (upgradient) edge of the
Site, the clay layer was reported absent in the borings for former wells MW-5S, MW-51D, P-23 and P-24.
The alluvial deposits at the Site are underlain by the Yorktown Formation, a regionally extensive marine
deposit. The upper Yorktown Formation, consisting typically of greenish -gray, clayey, silty, Shelly, very
fine sands, is encountered at the Site from approximately 13 feet below ground surface (bgs) to the
maximum depth of investigation of 35 feet bgs, and has a low permeability (average of 0.002 feet/day).
No groundwater quality impacts have been detected in monitoring wells completed in the deeper
Yorktown aquifer zone.
The general groundwater flow pattern at the Site is controlled largely by two groundwater discharge
features: Lane Swamp to the north and east, and Swift Creek to the south. Groundwater flow in the area
of the Site is generally from west to east with a northeast component of flow toward Lane Swamp at the
north end of the Site, and a southeast component of flow toward Swift Creek at the south end of the Site.
2.2 Contaminant Fate and Transport
The key features of the CSM for contaminant fate and transport are summarized as follows:
■ The depth to groundwater ranges from the ground surface at the creeks and swamps to more than 6
feet bgs in topographically higher areas (not including the beneficial fill footprint).
■ The regional groundwater flow regime within the surficial (alluvial) aquifer flows west to east, with
north and south flow components near Swift Creek and Lane Swamp, which serve as shallow
groundwater discharge features.
■ The estimated groundwater velocities at the Site are very low. The historical calculated groundwater
velocities are approximately 6 to 27 feet per year for the surficial (alluvial) aquifer and approximately
0.03 feet per year for the deeper Yorktown aquifer.
■ Prior to the 2018 corrective action, seasonal rises of the underlying water table and rainfall infiltration
downward through the old soil cap resulted in water infiltration into the coal ash fill. Constituents
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology January 19, 2022 Page 3

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT— NOVEMBER 2021 WATER QUALITY MONITORING ACTIVITIES
Battleboro, Nash County
within the coal ash fill were dissolved by the infiltration water and became mobile. The former
infiltration mechanism has been mitigated by the corrective action.
Once the infiltration water enters the surficial groundwater, it migrates laterally above a clay confining
or perching layer within the alluvial aquifer zone towards the groundwater discharge features of Lane
Swamp and Swift Creek, which serve to limit the lateral extent of the affected groundwater. The
limited lateral extent of the affected groundwater is evident at wells MW-2S and 2D, located
approximately 200 feet east of the former perimeter of the beneficial fill, where groundwater
concentrations are below 2L groundwater standards. Similarly, there is no evidence of affected
groundwater to the west (upgradient) as demonstrated by groundwater monitoring results at current
monitoring wells MW-5RS and MW-5RD and former monitoring wells MW-5S and 5D.
■ Based on historical groundwater monitoring results, the groundwater quality impacts at the Site are
limited to the surficial aquifer zone. No groundwater quality impacts are detected in the deeper
aquifer zone of the Yorktown Formation.
The swamps and creeks surrounding the beneficial fill site act as a "natural perimeter drain" and
intercept the affected groundwater. Based on the historical surface water monitoring results, there
are no surface water quality impacts to Lane Swamp or Swift Creek due to affected groundwater from
the Site.
3. WATER QUALITY MONITORING ACTIVITIES
3.1 Objectives
Demonstration of effectiveness of the completed remediation is the primary objective of the water quality
monitoring program (i.e. remedial performance monitoring). This objective is achieved by monitoring the
reduction of the site -specific contaminants of concern (COC) in groundwater, therefore mitigating the
potential for surface water quality impacts due to contaminated groundwater migration and discharge to
surface water.
The applicable preliminary remedial goals for groundwater and surface water are summarized below.
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology January 19, 2022 Page 4

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT — NOVEMBER 2021 WATER QUALITY MONITORING ACTIVITIES
Battleboro, Nash County
1compounds
• •
NC 2L •. •NC
Surface Water
2B Standard
Arsenic
•
0.01
•
0.15
Barium
0.7
NE
Cadmium
0.002
h
Chromium (Total)
0.01
h
Lead
0.015
0.025
Mercury
0.001
0.000012
Selenium
0.02
0.005
Silver
0.02
0.00006
Sulfate
250
NE
pH
6.5-8.5
6.0-9.0
North Carolina 2L Groundwater Quality Standard (April 1, 2013)
2 North Carolina Surface Water Quality Standard for Class C Waters (July 26, 2021)
NE = Not Established
mg/L = milligrams per liter
h = hardness dependent dissolved metal standard
Water quality monitoring is conducted in accordance with the NCDEQ-approved Corrective Action Plan
(ERM, March 2015). The following sections summarize the groundwater and surface water monitoring
activities conducted at the Site during the reporting period.
3.2 Monitoring Methods
A water quality monitoring event was conducted at the Site on November 1-2, 2021. Groundwater and
surface water samples were collected from the following monitoring wells and surface water locations.
Monitoring Wells Surface Water Locations
MW-1 S SW-1
MW-1 D SW-2
MW-2S SW-3
MW-2D
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5RS
MW-5RD
MW-6
M W-7
MW-8
Subtotal: 11 Subtotal: 3
The monitoring well and surface water locations are shown on Figure 2. Monitoring well construction
details are summarized in Table 1.
All monitoring wells were gauged for water levels and then purged and sampled by low -flow purging
methods. The surface water samples were collected as grab samples using clean containers. Field
parameters (pH, conductivity, temperature, dissolved oxygen and oxidation-reduction potential) were
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology January 19, 2022 Page 5

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT — NOVEMBER 2021 MONITORING RESULTS
Battleboro, Nash County
measured for each groundwater and surface water sample by calibrated meters. Well purge logs were
completed for each monitoring well to document the stabilization of field parameters prior to sample
collection. Well purge logs are provided in Appendix B. The groundwater and surface water samples
were placed in laboratory supplied containers and placed on ice. The samples were submitted to North
Carolina certified laboratory Pace Analytical Services (Formerly Shealy Environmental Services) (NC329)
and were analyzed for eight specific metals, sulfates and total dissolved solids using the analytical
methods summarized below:
Analytical Methods
MethodEPA
EPA Method 6010
EPA Method 7470C
Compound
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium (Total)
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Mercury
EPA 300.0 Sulfates
SM 2540 C Total Dissolved Solids
4. MONITORING RESULTS
4.1 Groundwater Monitoring Results
Groundwater monitoring activities were conducted at 11 monitoring wells at the Site. Groundwater depth -
to -water gauging and elevation data are presented in Table 2. The groundwater elevations in the surficial
aquifer on November 1, 2021 ranged from 89.89 feet above mean sea level (ft MSL) at MW-7 located on
the east (downgradient) side of the Site to 93.12 ft MSL at MW-4 located on the west (upgradient) side of
the Site. The groundwater elevations are below the base of the CCB fill, which generally ranges from 94
to 99 ft MSL from east to west. A potentiometric surface map for the surficial (alluvial) aquifer zone for the
November 2021 monitoring event is presented as Figure 3. Groundwater flow in the surficial aquifer over
most of the Site is generally west to east towards Lane Swamp Swift Creek, which serve as groundwater
discharge zones.
Using the current groundwater elevation data, the hydraulic gradients for the Site were calculated. See
summarized table below.
Horizontal Hydraulic.• -
01-November-2021
Well Head Head Distance Hydraulic Gradient
Designation Elevation Change Change
(ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/ft)
• � • .1 11 11 / 1/
- .•- Hvdraulic Gradient0.0035
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology January 19, 2022 Page 6

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT — NOVEMBER 2021
Battleboro, Nash County
MONITORING RESULTS
Groundwater seepage velocities were calculated using Darcy's equation, summarized as:
Where:
V=(Kxi)/ne
V = seepage velocity of groundwater in ft/day
K = hydraulic conductivity in ft/day
i = hydraulic gradient (ft/ft)
ne = effective porosity
As summarized below, the estimated groundwater seepage velocity in the surficial aquifer zone using a
primary porosity range of 10-25% is approximately 3 to 7 feet per year based on the November 2021
hydraulic gradients and the previously calculated mean hydraulic conductivities.
Seepage Velocity Range (Surficial Aquifer) =
= (0.55) (0.0035) / (0.25) = 7.66E-03 ft/day
= (0.55) (0.0035) / (0.10) = 1.91 E-02 ft/day
Range 25% 2.80 ft/yr
of
porosity 10% 6.99 ft/yr
Seepage
of3to7
The November 2021 groundwater analytical results are summarized in Table 3 for metals, sulfate and
total dissolved solids (TDS), and in Table 4 for field parameters. Constituents that exceeded North
Carolina 2L groundwater standards are summarized on Figure 4. Laboratory analytical reports for the
sampling event are provided in Appendix D. A historical groundwater data summary is provided in
Appendix A.
For the November 2021 monitoring event, four analytes were detected above their respective North
Carolina 2L groundwater standards, as summarized in the following table.
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology January 19, 2022 Page 7

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT— NOVEMBER 2021
Battleboro, Nash County
MONITORING RESULTS
Current Maximum Concentrations in Groundwater — November 2021
Arsenic 0.090 0.01
Lead 0.27 0.015
Sulfate 810 250
Total Dissolved Solids 10,000 500
mg/L = milligrams per liter
Sulfate, a primary indicator analyte for CCB contaminant releases, was detected in groundwater at
concentrations above its 2L standard (250 mg/L) at five of the 11 monitoring wells. The distribution of
sulfate concentrations across the Site is depicted in Figure 5. A hydrogeologic profile across the Site,
including sulfate concentrations in groundwater, is presented in Figure 6. The highest concentration of
sulfate was detected in the groundwater sample collected from monitoring well MW-3 (810 mg/L) located
on the southern (locally downgradient) side of the Site.
Graphs of sulfate concentrations over time for selected monitoring wells are presented in Figure 7. Since
the completion of the corrective action in January 2018, the graphs indicate fluctuating but overall
decreasing sulfate concentration trends at MW-3, MW-6, MW-7 and MW-8, where the most elevated
sulfate levels have historically been observed.
Notably low values of pH were measured in the groundwater samples from MW-6 (3.7), MW-7 (3.7), and
MW-8 (3.9). The low pH values at the three wells are consistent with historical monitoring results, and
correlate with detections of arsenic and lead, in addition to sulfate, at concentrations above their
respective North Carolina 2L groundwater standards at the three wells.
There were no exceedances of 2L standards in the two monitoring wells located on the west (upgradient)
side of the Site (MW-5RS & MW-5RD). Monitoring well MW-4, located near the southwest limit of the
CCB fill area, had only one exceedance (arsenic 0.035 mg/L) during the November 2021 monitoring
event. Historically, there have been no detectable levels of arsenic at MW-4 since 2010.
On the east side of the Site, sulfate and TDS concentrations exceeded their 2L standards in MW-1 S,
which is consistent with historical monitoring results. The only other exceedance of the 2L standards
detected in the four monitoring wells located on the east side of the Site (MW-1 D, MW-1 S, MW-2S and
MW-21D) was a concentration of TDS in MW-1 D. The elevated TDS concentration at MW-1 D does not
appear to be attributable to sulfate or metals, which were not present at elevated levels.
4.2 Surface Water Monitoring Results
Consistent with historical monitoring results, all November 2021 surface water monitoring results were
below the respective North Carolina 2B surface water standards for samples collected from Swift Creek
(SW-1) and Lane Swamp (SW-2 and SW-3). The November 2021 surface water sampling results are
summarized in Table 3. Laboratory analytical reports for the surface water samples are provided in
Appendix D. Historical surface water data is summarized in Appendix A.
4.3 Laboratory Data Quality Analysis
Quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) samples collected during the November 2021 groundwater
sampling activities included one blind duplicate sample collected at MW-1 S. The duplicate and parent
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology January 19, 2022 Page 8

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT— NOVEMBER 2021 SUMMARY
Battleboro, Nash County
sample results for MW-1S can be compared in Table 3. The analytical results of the MW-1S and
duplicate groundwater samples compare favorably, indicating no analytical discrepancy.
5. SUMMARY
Corrective actions have been implemented at the Site to address groundwater quality impacts in
accordance with the approved CAP. The corrective actions were completed in January 2018 and included
temporary removal of CCB materials to allow raising the floor foundation above the seasonal high
groundwater table, placing the CCB materials on the raised floor in a reduced footprint, installation of a
synthetic liner (cap) over the limits of the CCBs, and drainage improvements to minimize rainfall
infiltration. Groundwater and surface water monitoring activities are being conducted at the Site to monitor
the effectiveness of the previously completed corrective actions.
The November 2021 water quality monitoring event evaluated groundwater and surface water quality
conditions at the Site approximately 3.8 years after the corrective action completion. Since the
completion of the corrective action in 2018, the 4 monitoring wells (MW-3, MW-6, MW-7 and MW-8)
historically exhibiting the greatest sulfate concentrations in groundwater continue to exhibit overall
decreasing trends as shown in Figure 7. The trend of decreasing sulfate concentrations indicates that the
corrective action is effectively mitigating the groundwater quality impacts at the Site. The November 2021
surface water quality results continue to demonstrate that there have been no surface water impacts to
Swift Creek or Lane Swamp due to discharges of affected groundwater from the Site.
In accordance with the CAP, semi-annual water quality monitoring will continue at the Site, with the next
monitoring event tentatively planned for March 2022.
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology January 19, 2022 Page 9

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT — NOVEMBER 2021 SUMMARY
Battleboro, Nash County
Figures
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map and Monitoring Well Locations
Figure 3 Shallow Groundwater Potentiometric Map — November 2021
Figure 4 Groundwater Analytical Sample Results - Constituents Exceeding 2L
Groundwater Standards — November 2021
Figure 5 Groundwater Analytical Sample Resultss —Sulfate —Surf icial Aquifer
Figure 6 Hydrogeologic Profile A -A'
Figure 7 Sulfate Concentrations over Time — Selected Monitoring Wells
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology January 19, 2022 Page 10

e ; F •f " k
y ! �vl i
j{.� r y .r
evil
IN
it
3 1 t_.
_ +► w
If
n rL+],1 � � _ 1''e(yr��jq"y� y- w 'r � �= y __ �., � f � � �. .� � � •►r � -� _
f �
� �`��-�+ � � �N► 4 M _ � � } � f� f ti � f �� �_ r4-� _ yam+ ,_ �- �� � � � � •�
- - Vim__ M ~ + _
w!w ww _ �, f w w� .+r. w + + • w.s. 'r -rw - w - �'-w �` w •r -lot- w
41
rr
s
r + J L
u' a
r • w $ d11 "� i!
r1� r rAP n
' Feet ��� ' L� !
y Legend N Figure 1
Q site Site Location Map
o 2,000 ReUse Technology, Inc.
Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill - CCB0057
LD
i Environmental Resources Management Feet Battleboro, Nash County, North Carolina
ERM `v` w.erm.com 1:24,000 1 inch = 2,000 feet
Source: Copyright:© 2013 National Geoqraphic Society, i-cubed Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet

»I
1
u �
u
n i
MW-5RS
-Al SW-1
�I
i �A J'I
;Mw_3
~MWz1S
MW-1D
MW-2D
M W-7
`6 MW-8
DI
1:2,400 1 inch = 200 feet
r 0 100 200
5
7 Feet
tq
C
N
2 A
Legend
Figure 2
£,
Shallow Monitoring Well
Q Site
Site Plan
'. Abandoned Shallow Monitoring Well
Topographic Contour (1-ft intervals)
Reuse Technology, Inc.
Deep Monitoring Well
.// Wetland
Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill - CCB0057
Abandoned Deep Monitoring Well
E% Freshwater Pond
Battleboro, Nash County, North Carolina
0 Surface Water Monitoring Location
0 Riverine
Environmental Resources Management
w
o_
www.erm.com ERM
Source: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap,
increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survev, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Konq), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Communitv
Coordinate Svstem: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet
Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographies, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

SW-1
� l 1:1,680 1 inch = 140 feet
01
z 0 70 140
7 Feet
b, MW-5RS
_ --------- MW-51RD 91.49 —
91.22*,Q�
48MW--5D — 1
MW-4—
93.12
M W-3
9124
` o CO
i
►w w-9 MW-1S
90.46*
MW-7
89.93
90+50* .90�66
SW-2 MW-8
90.06
Legend
Shallow Monitoring Well r--j Site Potentiometric Surface Contour
'. Abandoned Shallow Monitoring Well Topographic Contour (1-ft intervals) Apparent Groundwater Flow Direction
Deep Monitoring Well Wetland Notes:
Groundwater elevation measurements collected 02 Nov 2021.
Abandoned Deep Monitoring Well Freshwater Pond 91.49 - Groundwater Elevation in Shallow Monitoring Well
0 Surface Water Monitoring Location Riverine 91.22" - Groundwater Elevation in Deep Monitoring Well (not contoured)
Elevations in feet above mean sea level
�f MW-6
); 89.89
A SW-3
Figure 3
Shallow Groundwater Potentiometric Surface
ReUse Technology, Inc.
Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill - CCB0057
Battleboro, Nash County, North Carolina
Environmental Resources Management
www.erm.com ERM
Coordinate Svstem: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet
�rce: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographies, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

e_
MW-5RD
None Exceed
MW-5RS
None Exceed
--r . -•- ._ ---- — •- MW-4
11/02/2021
Arsenic 0.035
SW-1 j
None Exceed
r
MW-3
11/02/2021
Sulfate 810
Dissolved Solids. Total 2,700
MW-1 S
11/01/2021
Sulfate
380
Dissolved Solids, Total
6,800 H
MW-1 D
11/01/2021
Dissolved Solids. Total
720H
,1
SW-2
None Exceed
MW-6
Sulfate
Dissolved Solids. Total
790
MW-7
09
1 11/01/2021
Arsenic
0.090
Lead
0.27
Sulfate
700
Dissolved Solids, Total
10,000
1:1,800 1 inch = 150 feet SW-3
N None Exceed
D 0 75 150
y
c
I MMMU
Feet
-
Legend
Figure 4
Shallow Monitoring Well
Q Site
Groundwater Analytical Results - Exceeds Standards
E t+tchir:
E
'. Abandoned Shallow Monitoring Well
CCB Structural Fill Boundary
Reuse Technology, Inc.
°
n
Deep Monitoring Well
Topographic Contour (1-ft intervals)
Notes:
Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill - CCB0057
Abandoned Deep Monitoring Well
��/, Wetland
Groundwater samples collected 02 Nov 2021.
Battleboro, Nash County, North Carolina
0
0 Surface Water Monitoring Location
Freshwater Pond
810 - Concentration in Monitoring Well
Concentrations in milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Environmental Resources Management
0
0 Riverine
Only Concentrations that exceed applicable regulatory standards are shown www.:rm.com ERM
Source: Sources: Esri,
HERE, Garmin, Intermap,
increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Konq), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Communitv
Coordinate Svstem: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet
ce: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographies, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

tMW=4
SW-1
1 161
MW
810'.
1
b,
MW-5RD MW-5RS
6.0 2.8
ci?IMW--5D — 1
Y MW-1S
380fMW 1 D
MW-2D \
1.1 i MW 2S
SW-2
1:1,680 1 inch = 140 feet !�\
z 0 70 140
Feet
N
C
N
Legend
❑ Shallow MonitoringWell Site Sulfate Isoconcentration Contours
trr_n:
'. Abandoned Shallow Monitoring Well Topographic Contour (1-ft intervals) Notes:
Deep Monitoring Well Wetland Groundwater samples collected 02 Nov 2021.
91.49 - Sulfate Concentration in Monitoring Well
Abandoned Deep Monitoring Well E% Freshwater Pond Concentration in milligrams per liter (mg/L)
0 Surface Water Monitoring Location F Riverine
BMW-7
700
MW-8
ie610 .
"*�� -1-100
+J p MW-6 i�
: —
c
✓790� N
SW-3
Figure 5
Groundwater Analytical Results - Sulfate
ReUse Technology, Inc.
Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill - CCB0057
Battleboro, Nash County, North Carolina
Environmental Resources Management
www.erm.com ERM
Coordinate Svstem: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet
,urce: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographies, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

0
u
u Notes:
0
o Vertical Exaggeration = 10:1
(90.55) Groundwater Elevation
1 inch = 150 feet
380 Sulfate Concentration (mg/L)
' A
A
Groundwater Elevation
2021)
(November
Well Details
150
150
_ Casing
® Screen
140
140
Subsurface Details
♦ h
Existing Clay Layer from Boring
♦ �,
Logs (Alluvial)
130
♦
130
e
!I
lzu
i
lzu
n
CCB Fill
110
110
n
'2
Y
,
El
n
(93.12)
♦
L 100
n
p rn
N
� ♦ , � �rL M
100
(90.66)
90
25
90
380 9 3
700
so
<1.0 610
80
Alluvial Aquifer 0 325 650
Feet
70 Yorktown Aquifer 70
16
n
-I 6o L A 1.1 J 60
>I 50 1 1 50
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 Fig u re6
, Earthstar Geoqraphics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN,
Hydrogeologic Profile A -A'
ReUse Technology, Inc.
Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill - CCB0057
Battleboro, Nash County, North Carolina
Environmental Resources Management kb
www.erm.com ERM
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet

FIGURE 7 - SULFATE CONCENTRATIONS OVER TIME
SWIFT CREEK CCB FILL SITE
800
700
600
500
n
400
v
300
3
`) 200
100
0
>J�O
O'l OV O\ O% O_J /� Y /� V A'J /�N lb nV ^ \ N% ^_J r& /� Y
PJ� �eQ &, �° O Sao Y �1 >4a Y PQ >�o Y 1O0 Y ,J� Y PJ�Y 4 > dG- V�°, V
Sulfate ......••• Sulfate Concentration Trend
MW-3
1200
1000
800
J
600
v
N 400
200
0
Oh 00 O� O� O� ,y0 ,y'y y'L ,y3 ,you `yh ti� ti� ti� ti0 ,y0 ,titi
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
Sulfate ......••• Sulfate Concentration Trend
1200
1000
800
J
bD
C 600
v
7- 400
200
0
W®
MW-6
(�, 00 O� O� O°� y0 yy yL yS yb yh ti0 ti� ti� ti� ti0 Ly
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
0—Seriesl ......••• Sulfate Concentration Trend

FIGURE 7 - SULFATE CONCENTRATIONS OVER TIME
SWIFT CREEK CCB FILL SITE
1000
900
800
700
600
on
500
400
2= zv000�
'n 300
200
100
0
Oh O� 01 OR' O� y0 yy yL y3 yA yh 1� 'yA y4' ti0 ti0 by
e� e� e� e� e� e� e� e� e� e�
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
f Sulfate ......••• Sulfate Concentration Trend
MW-8
1200
1000
800
J
bD
600
v'
m
75 400.... ..........•
N
Iis1s.
0
OA ow o� do titi titi ti3 ti° ti`' ti° ti� tiw ti° do titi
♦Sulfate ......••• Sulfate Concentration Trend

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT — NOVEMBER 2021
Battleboro, Nash County
SUMMARY
Tables
Table 1 Monitoring Well Construction Data Summary
Table 2 Historical Groundwater Elevation Data
Table 3 Groundwater and Surface Water Analytical Sample Results
Table 4 Groundwater and Surface Water Field Parameter Results
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology January 19, 2022 Page 11

TABLE 1
MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA SUMMARY - SWIFT CREEK PROJECT
Monitor Well
Top of
Casing Elev.
MW-1 S
99.54
MW-1 D
99.90
MW-2S
94.87
MW-21D
95.22
MW-3
102.15
MW-4
106.06
MW-5S
102.68
MW-51D
102.67
MW-5RS
98.80
MW-5RD
98.57
MW-6
98.41
MW-7
98.63
MW-8
95.42
Ground
Surface Elev.
96.8
97.1
92.1
92.2
99.2
104.1
99.7
99.8
TBD
TBD
95.0
95.1
92.4
Casing Stick
Up
2.7
2.8
2.8
3.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
2.9
Flush Mount
Flush Mount
3.4
3.5
KIM
Screen
Interval
3-13
23-33
6-16
26-36
7-17
8-18
6-16
25-35
8-18
30-35
6-16
6-16
Total
Depth (TOC)
15.7
35.7
18.7
39.1
20.0
20.0
17.0
37.9
18.0
37.9
19.4
19.5
19.0
Status
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Abandoned
Abandoned
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Piezometer
P-1
108.19
105.6
2.6
20-30
32.6
Abandoned
P-2
109.53
106.7
2.8
20-30
32.8
Abandoned
P-3
106.18
104.4
1.8
18-28
30.0
Abandoned
P-4
106.57
104.0
2.6
20-30
32.6
Abandoned
P-5
108.39
105.9
2.5
20-30
32.5
Abandoned
P-6
109.79
107.5
2.3
20-30
32.3
Abandoned
P-7
107.77
105.9
1.9
30-40
41.9
Abandoned
P-8
106.53
103.9
2.6
30-40
42.6
Abandoned
P-9
103.32
100.9
2.4
20-30
32.4
Abandoned
P-10
108.17
106.1
2.1
20-30
32.1
Abandoned
P-11
101.88
99.2
2.7
13-23
25.7
Abandoned
P-12
107.04
104.0
3.0
6-16
19.0
Abandoned
P-13
108.99
105.9
3.1
6-16
19.1
Abandoned
P-14
105.38
101.9
3.5
4-14
17.5
Abandoned
P-15
103.76
101.0
2.8
4-14
16.8
Abandoned
P-16
105.28
102.1
3.2
4-14
17.2
Abandoned
P-17
105.31
101.8
3.5
4-14
17.5
Abandoned
P-18
111.21
107.5
3.7
5-15
18.7
Abandoned
P-19
111.86
108.3
3.6
7-17
20.6
Abandoned
P-20
107.00
104.2
2.8
7-17
19.8
Abandoned
P-21
104.99
99.5
5.5
4.5-11.5
16.5
Abandoned
P-22
103.60
101.8
1.8
17-27
28.8
Abandoned
P-23East
109.75
107.1
2.7
9-19
21.8
Abandoned
P-24West
103.17
101.1
2.1
3-13
15.3
Abandoned
B-1
107.66
105.7
2.0
14-19
21.0
Abandoned

TABLE 2
HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA
SWIFT CREEK - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 1 of 1
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Gauging Date
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
Well Identification
MWAS
MW-1D
MW-2S
MW-213
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5S
MW-5D
MW-6
MW-7
MW-8
MW-5RS
MW-5RD
Lane Swamp
TOC Elevation:
99.54
99.90
94.87
95.22
102.15
106.06
102.68
102.67
98.41
98.63
95.42
98.80
98.57
92.25
TOC Stickup (Ft from GL)
2.7
2.8
2.8
6-16
3.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
2.9
25-35
3.4
3.5
3.0
6-16
N/A
Screened Interval (Ft BGL)
3-13
23-33
26-36
7-17
8-18
6-16
6-16
6-16
8-18
30-35
N/A
Geologic Zone Screened
Surficial
Surficial
Surficial
Deep (Yorktown)
Surficial
Surficial
Surficial
Deep (Yorktown)
Surficial
Surficial
Surficial
Surficial
Deep (Yorktown)
N/A
12-Jan-2005
8.21
91.33
8.57
91.33
4.72
90.15
4.7
90.52
9.65
92.50
11.24
94.82
6.01
96.67
6.4
96.27
7.17
91.24
7.63
91.00
NM
-
--
1-Aug-2006
8.11
91.43
8.28
91.62
NM
--
NM
--
9.48
92.67
10.15
95.91
5.86
96.82
5.68
96.99
7.18
91.23
7.74
90.89
NM
-
--
6-Sep-2006
8.69
90.85
9.05
90.85
4.83
90.04
4.87
90.35
10.32
91.83
11.41
94.65
6.94
95.74
6.84
95.83
7.74
90.67
8.66
89.97
NM
-
4-Apr-2007
7.80
91.74
8.18
91.72
4.4
90.47
4.75
90.47
9.31
92.84
9.96
96.10
6.12
96.56
5.96
96.71
7.28
91.13
7.8
90.83
4.84
90.58
-
21-Aug-2007
10.89
88.65
11.30
88.60
6.77
88.10
6.82
88.40
11.4
90.75
13.28
92.78
9.57
93.11
9.42
93.25
10.8
87.61
10.71
87.92
7.67
87.75
-
21-Oct-2007
11.40
88.14
11.76
88.14
7.31
87.56
7.43
87.79
12.98
89.17
14.06
92.00
10.62
92.06
10.63
92.04
11.9
86.51
11.41
87.22
8.3
87.12
-
--
31-Jan-2008
9.13
90.41
9.42
90.48
4.86
90.01
5.02
90.20
10.7
91.45
14.11
91.95
7.65
95.03
8.11
94.56
8.44
89.97
8.71
89.92
5.57
89.85
--
--
22-Mar-2008
8.10
91.44
8.44
91.46
4.4
90.47
4.54
90.68
9.18
92.97
13.28
92.78
6.98
95.70
7.34
95.33
7.18
91.23
7.79
90.84
4.78
90.64
--
-
2.51
89.74
9-Apr-2008
9.26
90.28
9.47
90.43
4.58
90.29
5.02
90.20
10.98
91.17
14.82
91.24
10.87
91.81
10.72
91.95
8.92
89.49
9.06
89.57
5.97
89.45
-
-
3.1
89.15
17-Jun-2008
9.12
90.42
9.42
90.48
5.03
89.84
5.23
89.99
10.54
91.61
14.05
92.01
8.93
93.75
8.92
93.75
8.36
90.05
9.06
89.57
6.09
89.33
-
--
3.2
89.05
13-Jan-2009
8.22
91.32
8.55
91.35
4.26
90.61
4.46
90.76
9.35
92.80
13.41
92.65
7.16
95.52
7.54
95.13
7.02
91.39
7.6
91.03
4.58
90.84
--
2.52
89.73
31-Mar-2009
7.60
91.94
7.96
91.94
4.36
90.51
4.38
90.84
6.74
95.41
12.43
93.63
5.98
96.70
6.22
96.45
6.81
91.60
7.2
91.43
4.21
91.21
-
2.5
89.75
23-Jun-2009
8.62
90.92
8.92
90.98
4.41
90.46
4.77
90.45
10.06
92.09
13.86
92.20
9.83
92.85
9.63
93.04
7.72
90.69
8.52
90.11
5.56
89.86
-
-
2.9
89.35
30-Sep-2009
8.86
90.68
9.18
90.72
4.64
90.23
5.00
90.22
10.82
91.33
14.7
91.36
10.4
92.28
10.26
92.41
8.08
90.33
8.51
90.12
5.5
89.92
-
--
3.15
89.10
15-Dec-2009
7.54
92.00
NM
--
4.22
90.65
NM
--
8.68
93.47
12.85
93.21
6.3
96.38
NM
--
6.78
91.63
7.13
91.50
4.21
91.21
-
-
2.6
89.65
31-Mar-2010
7.37
92.17
7.74
92.16
2.42
92.45
4.46
90.76
8.64
93.51
12.52
93.54
5.8
96.88
6.19
96.48
6.77
91.64
7.93
90.70
3.96
91.46
-
2.14
90.11
29-Jun-2010
9.35
90.19
NM
--
4.94
89.93
NM
--
10.66
91.49
14.62
91.44
9.97
92.71
NM
--
9.21
89.20
9.25
89.38
6.31
89.11
--
3.35
88.90
28-Sep-2010
9.23
90.31
10.05
89.85
4.8
90.07
5.50
89.72
11.55
90.60
14.8
91.26
10.85
91.83
11.1
91.57
9.11
89.30
8.52
90.11
5.48
89.94
-
-
4.1
88.15
13-Dec-2010
8.54
91.00
NM
--
4.36
90.51
NM
--
10.12
92.03
14.02
92.04
8.72
93.96
NM
--
7.37
91.04
7.93
90.70
4.81
90.61
-
-
2.02
90.23
28-Mar-2011
8.03
91.51
8.42
91.48
4.35
90.52
4.67
90.55
9.17
92.98
13.32
92.74
7.45
95.23
7.84
94.83
7.25
91.16
7.53
91.10
4.42
91.00
-
2.85
89.40
26-Jun-2011
10.05
89.49
10.35
89.55
6.02
88.85
6.32
88.90
11.23
90.92
14.82
91.24
10.59
92.09
10.43
92.24
9.2
89.21
9.98
88.65
7.04
88.38
--
2.85
89.40
28-Sep-2011
7.84
91.70
NM
--
4.24
90.63
NM
--
8.9
93.25
13.09
92.97
7.62
95.06
NM
--
7.13
91.28
7.71
90.92
4.83
90.59
--
-
2.2
90.05
18-Dec-2011
8.00
91.54
8.35
91.55
4.32
90.55
4.65
90.57
8.88
93.27
13.1
92.96
7.35
95.33
7.7
94.97
6.98
91.43
7.53
91.10
4.47
90.95
-
1.8
90.45
23-Mar-2012
8.01
91.53
8.35
91.55
4.31
90.56
4.56
90.66
8.89
93.26
13.01
93.05
7.35
95.33
7.66
95.01
7.03
91.38
7.75
90.88
4.8
90.62
--
1.65
90.60
28-Jun-2012
8.39
91.15
8.72
91.18
4.65
90.22
4.92
90.30
9.4
92.75
13.38
92.68
8.52
94.16
8.54
94.13
7.42
90.99
8.45
90.18
5.63
89.79
--
1.95
90.30
18-Sep-2012
7.41
92.13
7.86
92.04
4.16
90.71
4.5
90.72
8.21
93.94
12.73
93.33
7.21
95.47
7.45
95.22
6.82
91.59
7.37
91.26
4.51
90.91
-
1.52
90.73
17-Dec-2012
8.04
91.50
8.44
91.46
NM
--
NM
--
9.19
92.96
13.36
92.70
8.55
94.13
8.76
93.91
6.82
91.59
7.37
91.26
4.51
90.91
-
-
1.45
90.80
26-Mar-2013
7.87
91.67
8.13
91.77
4.23
90.64
4.46
90.76
8.71
93.44
12.84
93.22
7.03
95.65
7.38
95.29
7.08
91.33
7.26
91.37
4.22
91.20
--
2.05
90.20
12-Apr-2013
8.30
91.24
8.59
91.31
4.31
90.56
4.72
90.50
9.59
92.56
14.13
91.93
8.48
94.20
8.7
93.97
7.47
90.94
7.8
90.83
4.82
90.60
--
2.85
89.40
25-Jun-2013
8.00
91.54
8.34
91.56
4.18
90.69
4.57
90.65
9.05
93.10
12.97
93.09
6.92
95.76
7.44
95.23
7.05
91.36
7.7
90.93
4.69
90.73
2.45
89.80
26-Sep-2013
8.38
91.16
8.67
91.23
4.32
90.55
4.71
90.51
9.57
92.58
13.65
92.41
9.5
93.18
9.5
93.17
8.75
89.66
8.19
90.44
5.25
90.17
--
-
3.05
89.20
28-Mar-2014
7.74
91.80
8.03
91.87
4.33
90.54
4.54
90.68
8.56
93.59
12.53
93.53
6.68
96.00
7.03
95.64
6.92
91.49
7.23
91.40
4.39
91.03
--
1.85
90.40
27-Jun-2014
8.43
91.11
8.74
91.16
4.45
90.42
4.8
90.42
9.69
92.46
13.93
92.13
7.78
94.90
8.8
93.87
8.33
90.08
8.54
90.09
5.6
89.82
-
2.95
89.30
26-Sep-2014
7.82
91.72
8.20
91.70
3.91
90.96
4.28
90.94
8.62
93.53
13.81
92.25
6.68
96.00
7.33
95.34
7.1
91.31
7.36
91.27
4.4
91.02
1.95
90.30
17-Dec-2014
7.88
91.66
8.30
91.60
4.22
90.65
4.53
90.69
9.01
93.14
13.71
92.35
7.94
94.74
7.46
95.21
7.24
91.17
7.4
91.23
4.34
91.08
-
2.1
90.15
28-Jun-2018
9.36
90.18
9.55
90.35
4.56
90.31
4.96
90.26
10.35
91.80
11.65
94.41
Abandoned
2015
Abandoned
2015
8.68
89.73
9.12
89.51
5.86
89.56
6.84
91.96
10.52
88.05
22-Jan-2019
8.68
90.86
9.14
90.76
3.8
91.07
4.55
90.67
9.71
92.44
11.24
94.82
Abandoned
2015
Abandoned
2015
7.78
90.63
7.93
90.70
4.93
90.49
6.59
92.21
5.75
92.82
--
17-Jun-2019
8.90
90.64
10.16
89.74
4.06
90.81
4.56
90.66
10.54
91.61
11.96
94.10
Abandoned
2015
Abandoned
2015
8.19
90.22
8.55
90.08
5.35
90.07
6.98
91.82
8.95
89.62
--
9-Mar-2020
8.66
90.88
8.99
90.91
3.95
90.92
4.45
90.77
9.74
92.41
11.26
94.80
Abandoned
2015
Abandoned
2015
7.79
90.62
8.08
90.55
4.61
90.81
5.81
92.99
6.01
92.56
--
9-Nov-2020
8.65
90.89
8.80
91.10
3.73
91.14
4.27
90.95
9.98
92.17
11.56
94.50
Abandoned
2015
Abandoned
2015
7.8
90.61
8.2
90.43
4.89
90.53
5.7
93.10
6.03
92.54
--
--
25-Mar-2021
8.52
91.02
8.82
91.08
3.8
91.07
4.35
90.87
9.61
92.54
11.3
94.76
Abandoned
2015
Abandoned
2015
7.61
90.80
7.5
91.13
NM
NM
5.88
92.92
5.28
93.29
-
1-Nov-2021
8.77
90.77
9.44
90.46
4.21
90.66
4.72
90.50
10.91
91.24
12.94
93.12
Abandoned
2015
Abandoned
2015
8.52
89.89
8.7
89.93
5.36
90.06
7.31
91.49
7.35
91.22
--
NE - Not Established
-- = Not Measured
BTOC = Below Top of Casing BGL - Below ground level
ft MSL = feet above Mean Sea Level TOC Stickup data per Sherrill Environmental, Assessment Montoring Report , Feb 10, 2015 10-7-20 Note: Historical GW elevation values corrected for MW-3
RJRTIDRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2021 11.xisxl2. GW Elevations

TABLE 3
GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL EVENT RESULTS
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 1 of 1
Sample
Location / ID
Date
D
CD
W
n
a
s
o
o
°'
a
m
Z
cn
m
Cn
`<
cn
0
En
Cn ccnn
° o
a m
NC 2L Groundwater Standard
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
NC 213 Surface Water Standard
0.15
NE
h
h
0.025
0.000012
0.005
0.00006
NE
NE
GROUNDWATER MONITORING
WELLS
MW-1S
11/1/21
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
380
6,800
FD-01 (MW-1S)
11/1/21
<0.015
0.27
<0.005
<0.01
0.031
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
410
7,000
MW-1D
11/1/21
<0.015
0.027
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
16
720
MW-2S
11/1/21
<0.015
0.2
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1.0
360
MW-2D
11/1/21
<0.015
0.066
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.1
320
MW-3
11/2/21
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
810
2,700
MW-4
11/2/21
0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
25
230
MW-5RS
11/1/21
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.8
300
MW-5RD
11/1/21
<0.01
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.0
190
MW-6
11/2/21
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
7,509
MW-7
11/1/21
0.0901
0.13
<0.005
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
700
10,000
MW-8
11/1/21
0.070
0.089
<0.005
<0.01
0.24
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
610
7,300
SURFACE WATER
SW-01
11/1/21
<0.01b
0.027
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.3
75
SW-02
11/1/21
<0.015
0.048
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
5.3
110
SW-03
11/1/21
<0.015
0.026
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
9.3
82
All concentrations in milligrams per liter (mg/L) unless
otherwise noted.
--- Not sampled
NE - Not established
Bold with gray background indicates exceedance of NC Groundwater or Surface Water Standai
h = hardness dependent dissolved metal standard
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2021 11.xlsx/Table 3-Event Data 2021-11

TABLE 4
GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER FIELD PARAMETER RESULTS
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA Page 1 of 1
Sample
Location / ID
Date
=
3
nCQD m
`�-° v
v �
3 5
o3c
n
c
a
o
? A O
of as
< 0
p
X
o
cn <
v CDa
INC 2L Groundwater Standard
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NC 2B Surface Water Standard
6.0 - 9.0
NE
NE
50
NE
>5.0
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS
MW-1S
11/1/21
5.8
20.2
10,278
4.5
-27
0.31
MW-1D
11/1/21
7.0
20.4
1,205
1.0
-41
0.97
MW-2S
11/1/21
6.9
18.8
684
25.1
-106
0.30
MW-213
11/1/21
7.2
18.3
478
2.6
-91
0.34
MW-3
11/2/21
5.4
19.5
3,831
6.0
48
0.39
MW-4
11/2/21
6.4
22
320
5.9
14
0.29
MW-5RS
11/1/21
7.0
22.8
450
3.1
24
0.47
MW-5RD
11/1/21
7.4
21.6
321
1.5
-45
1.05
MW-6
11/2/21
3.7
20.2
9,522
0.3
231
0.30
MW-7
11/1/21
3.7
20.9
15,392
3.9
205
0.27
MW-8
11/1/21
3.9
19.5
12,230
8.8
235
0.29
SURFACE WATER
SW-01
11/1/21
7.3
14.4
77
14
35
8.16
SW-02
11/1/21
6.7
17.1
185
7
-9
2.48
SW-03
11/1/21
6.5
20.7
173
7
35
3.14
NE - Not established NM - Not measured
Bold value exceeds applicable pH standard
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2021 11.xlsx/Table 4-Field Parameters2021-11

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT— NOVEMBER 2021
APPENDIX A HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER
RESULTS
November 2021
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology January 19, 2022
P:\Projects\0397281 ReUse CAP Implementation Swift Cr.DW\Post Closure Monitoring\2021-11 GWS\Swift Creek Water Quality Monitoring Report DRAFT TW_bpw.docx

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Sample
Location / ID
Date
D
0'
oo
°'
C'
3
0-
D
C'
D
o
o
C'
v 3
r
O
Q
S
C
3
C'
cn
<'
mCD
cn
c
N
o
v
°
m
0_
C
-O
=
Q
cc
m
m
C'
v i3
_
0
o CL
n <'
3 �'
Zc
6
Q
Z, �'
O
CD
in CD
m
3 -'. p'
<
x0(
< 0
(c c0 <
r CD Q
NC 2L Ground Water Standard
(mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
1 0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
1 0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Ju1-04
0.028
0.19
<0.001
<0.01
0.068
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
490
MW-IS
Dec-05
0.02
0.17
<0.001
<0.01
0.042
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
608
Oct-06
0.012
0.472
<0.001
<0.01
0.052
0.00064
<0.01
<0.01
740
May-07
<0.01
0.458
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
0.00047
<0.01
<0.01
420
Nov-07
<0.01
0.529
<0.001
<0.01
0.031
0.00089
<0.01
<0.01
520
Jun-08
<0.01
0.619
<0.001
<0.01
0.011
0.00051
<0.01
<0.01
470
Jan-09
<0.01
0.416
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
210
Jun-09
<0.01
0.412
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
220
Dec-09
<0.01
0.256
0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
0.022
<0.01
160
Jun-10
0.012
0.691
0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
280
Dec-10
<0.01
0.599
0.003
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
400
Jun-11
<0.10
0.475
<0.01
<0.10
<0.10
<0.00028
<0.10
<0.10
590
Dec-11
<0.050
0.422
<0.005
<0.050
<0.050
<0.0002
<0.050
<0.050
170
Jun-12
<0.01
0.419
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
150
Dec-12
0.018
0.567
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
180
Jun-13
<0.01
0.174
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
75
Dec-13
<0.01
0.163
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
99
Jun-14
<0.01
0.25
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
110
Dec-14
<0.01
0.408
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
310
Jun-18
<0.015
0.24
<0.005
<0.030
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
320
8,100
5.8
27.0
14,679
5
47
0.18
Jan-19
<0.015
0.27
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
270
4,700
6.0
6.4
4,305
7
4
0.53
Jun-19
<0.015
0.28
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
320
7,400
5.8
21.4
11,617
9
-51
0.19
Mar-20
<0.015
0.22
<0.005
<0.01
L 0.03
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
480
8,500
6.0
17.0
14,566
5
2
0.25
Nov-20
<0.015
0.26
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
400
8,500
5.6
23.8
8,023
2
-116
0.43
Mar-21
<0.015
0.23
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
430
6,200
6.1
16.1
10,125
8
-80
0.41
Duplicate (FD-01)
Mar-21
<0.015
0.22
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
430
6,100
--
--
--
Nov-21
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
380
6,800
5.8
20.2
10,278
4.5
-27
0.31
Duplicate (FD-01)
Nov-21
<0.015
0.27
<0.005
<0.01
0.031
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
410
7,000
--
-
--
Jul-04
<0.01
0.54
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
13
MW-1D
<0.01
<0.01
7.7
Page 1 of 9
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2021 11.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
o
Q
v
cc
_
0
O
CD
D
oo
0-
o
cn
°
m
o CL
Z c
m'C-o
Sample
°'
D
o
r
S
3
cn
c
m
m
6
m
x0(
< 0
Location / ID
Date
C'
3
C'
D
C'
v 3
O
Q
C
C'
<'
mCD
N
0_
-O
=
C'
v i3
n <'
3 �'
Q
v �'
3 -'. p'
<
(c c0 <
r CD Q
0'
C
NC 2L Ground Water Standard
(mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Oct-06
<0.01
0.341
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
20
May-07
<0.01
0.343
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
12
Oct-07
<0.01
0.365
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
11
Jun-08
<0.01
0.334
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
14
Jan-08
<0.01
0.356
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
14
Jun-09
<0.01
0.403
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
20
Jun-18
<0.01
0.66
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
19
8,200
6.9
25.6
1,221
3
-93
0.18
Jan-19
<0.01
0.67
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
17
750
6.9
8.9
1,165
7
-46
0.85
Jun-19
<0.01
0.66
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
13
800
6.8
22.4
1,374
11
-56
0.23
Mar-20
<0.01
0.67
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
13
730
7.0
18.2
1,344
9
11
1.97
Nov-20
<0.01
0.6
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
16
810
6.9
24.4
1,304
2
-68
0.40
Mar-21
<0.01
0.59
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
15
780
7.1
20.9
1,229
10
94
1.78
Nov-21
<0.015
0.027
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
16
720
7.0
20.4
1,205
1
-41
0.97
Jun-04
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
32
MW-2S
Dec-05
<0.01
0.18
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
10.1
Oct-06
<0.01
0.198
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
May-07
<0.01
0.232
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
4.4
Oct-07
<0.01
0.256
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
3.6
Jun-08
<0.01
0.103
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
4.4
Jan-09
<0.01
0.164
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
<5
Jun-09
<0.01
0.173
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
<5
Dec-09
<0.01
0.218
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Jun-10
<0.01
0.229
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Dec-10
<0.01
0.235
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Jun-11
<0.01
0.182
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Dec-11
<0.01
0.216
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Jun-12
<0.01
0.178
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Jun-13
<0.01
0.21
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Dec-13
I <0.01
1 0.199
<0.001
I <0.01
I <0.01
1 <0.0002
<0.01
I <0.01
1 <5
Page 2of9
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2021 11.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
o
Q
v
cc
_
0
O
CD
D
oo
0-
o
cn
°
m
o CL
Z c
m'C-o
Sample
°'
3
0
r
S
3
cn
c
m
m
6
m
x0(
< 0
Location / ID
Date
0'
C'
3
C'
5
C'
v 3
O
Q
C
C'
<'
mCD
N
0_
C
-O
=
C'
v i3
n <'
3 �'
Q
v �'
3 -'. p'
<
(c c0 <
r CD Q
NC 2L Ground Water Standard
(mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Jun-14
<0.01
0.165
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Dec-14
<0.01
0.2
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Jun-18
<0.015
0.13
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
790
6.3
21.0
448
0
-36
0.18
Jan-19
<0.015
0.21
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
400
6.9
10.0
611
5
-124
0.55
Jun-19
<0.015
0.24
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
430
7.0
20.8
641
2
-152
0.18
Mar-20
<0.015
0.28
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
400
6.9
16.8
759
4
-146
0.36
Nov-20
<0.015
0.24
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
400
6.3
21.3
732
15
-120
0.34
Mar-21
<0.015
0.23
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
340
6.6
16.7
615
2
-101
0.20
Nov-21
<0.015
0.20
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1.0
360
6.9
18.8
684
25
-106
0.30
M W -2 D
Jun-04
<0.01
0.17
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.6
Dec-05
<0.01
0.3
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
3.1
Oct-06
<0.01
0.29
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
11
May-07
<0.01
0.254
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
2.9
Oct-07
<0.01
0.273
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
4.8
Jun-08
<0.01
0.265
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
22
Jan-09
<0.01
0.253
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
16
Jun-09
<0.01
0.289
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
6.3
Jun-18
<0.015
0.13
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
790
7.1
25.0
444
10
18
1.30
Jan-19
<0.015
0.30
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.5
310
7.2
9.7
474
5
-94
880.38
Jun-19
<0.015
0.29
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
330
7.3
20.0
501
10
-63
0.27
Mar-20
<0.015
0.29
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
300
7.1
19.4
540
2
75
0.52
Nov-20
<0.015
0.27
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.3
300
7.1
22.0
529
3
-86
0.34
Mar-21
<0.015
0.27
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
300
7.3
20.4
538
2
-84
0.61
Nov-21
<0.015
0.07
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.1
320
7.2
18.3
478
3
-91
0.34
Dec-05
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
334
MW-3
Oct-06
<0.01
0.192
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
580
May-07
<0.01
0.342
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
570
Nov-07
<0.01
0.133
<0.001
<0.01
0.036
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
380
Page 3 of 9
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2021 11.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Sample
Location / ID
Date
D
0'
oo
°'
C'
3
0-
D
C'
D
o
o
C'
v 3
r
O
Q
S
C
3
C'
cn
<'
mCD
cn
c
N
o
v
°
m
0_
C
-O
=
Q
cc
m
m
C'
v i3
_
0
o CL
n <'
3 �'
Z c
6
Q
v �'
O
CD
m'C-o
m
3 -'. p'
<
x0(
< 0
(c c0 <
r CD Q
NC 2L Ground Water Standard
(mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
1 0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
1 0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Jun-08
<0.01
0.145
<0.001
<0.01
0.022
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
370
Jan-09
<0.01
0.144
<0.001
<0.01
0.013
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
550
Jun-09
<0.01
0.202
<0.001
<0.01
0.081
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
570
Dec-09
0.012
0.192
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
710
Jun-10
0.011
0.094
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
840
Dec-10
<0.01
0.125
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
690
Jun-11
<0.10
0.119
<0.01
<0.10
<0.10
<0.0002
<0.10
<0.10
790
Dec-11
<0.01
0.234
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
410
Jun-12
<0.01
0.125
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.05
<0.01
1,000
Dec-12
0.013
0.136
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
0.011
<0.01
910
Jun-13
<0.10d
0.201
<0.01 d
<0.1 d
<0.1 d
<0.0002
<0.1 d
<0.1 d
950
Dec-13
<0.050d
0.162
<0.005d
<0.05d
<0.05d
<0.0002
<0.05d
<0.05d
890
Jun-14
<0.027d
0.116
<0.002d
<0.07d
<0.01d
<0.0002
<0.025d
<0.07d
970
Dec-14
<0.050d
0.151
<0.005d
<0.05d
<0.05d
<0.0002
<0.05d
<0.05d
760
Jun-18
<0.015
0.066
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
980
830
5.5
27.2
7,611
9
60
0.30
Jan-19
<0.015
0.088
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
930
130
--
4.4
5,256
11
679
369.94
Jun-19
<0.015
0.072
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1,000
4,400
5.2
22.9
6,520
10
-39
0.20
Mar-20
<0.015
0.044
<0.005
<0.01
0.014
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
580
1,600
5.6
16.0
2,456
10.8
-49
0.63
Nov-20
<0.015
0.049
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
710
25,000
5.2
18.9
2,921
6.3
66
0.20
Duplicate (FD-01)
Nov-20
<0.015
0.26
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
370
6,400
--
--
--
-
--
Mar-21
<0.015
0.038
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
240
830
6.0
17.5
1,357
19.8
57
0.38
Nov-21
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
810
2,700
5.4
19.5
3,831
6.0
48
0.39
MW-4
Dec-05
<0.01
0.46
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.7
Oct-06
<0.01
0.171
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
May-07
<0.01
<0.100
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
8.6
Oct-07
<0.01
0.147
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.9
Jun-08
<0.01
0.198
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.4
Jan-09
<0.01
0.083
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
6.4
Jun-09
I <0.01
1 0.3491
NRI
NRI
<0.010
<0.00021
NRI
NRI
7.7
Page 4of9
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2021 11.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
o
Q
v
cc
_
0
O
CD
D
oo
0-
o
cn
°
m
o CL
Z c
m'C-o
Sample
°'
3
0
r
S
3
cn
c
m
m
6
m
x0(
< 0
Location / ID
Date
0'
C'
3
C'
5
C'
v 3
O
Q
C
C'
<'
mCD
N
0_
C
-O
=
C'
v i3
n <'
3 �'
Q
v �'
3 -'. p'
<
(c c0 <
r CD Q
NC 2L Ground Water Standard
(mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
1 0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
1 0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Dec-09
<0.01
0.121
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
7.5
Jun-10
<0.01
0.181
<0.001
0.018
<0.010
0.0006
<0.01
<0.01
15
Dec-10
0.016
0.195
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
16
Jun-11
<0.01
0.227
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
28
Dec-11
<0.01
0.516
0.003
<0.01
0.021
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
51
Jun-12
<0.01
0.356
0.008
<0.01
0.032
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
100
Jun-13
<0.01
0.109
0.004
<0.01
0.021
0.00078
<0.01
<0.01
250
Dec-13
<0.01
0.167
0.006
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
130
Jul-14
<0.01
0.085
0.0017
<0.01
<0.010
0.00101
<0.01
<0.01
190
Dec-14
<0.01
0.071
0.0017
<0.01
<0.010
0.00111
<0.01
<0.01
260
Jun-18
<0.01
0.041
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
66
450
6.4
25.1
72
7
56
0.28
Jan-19
<0.01
0.044
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
46
320
6.7
9.3
499
13
52
0.83
Jun-19
<0.01
0.052
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
30
310
6.9
22.0
553
7
-91
0.47
Mar-20
<0.01
0.054
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
37
<25
6.5
16.0
455
5
-51
0.42
Nov-20
<0.01
0.061
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
29
250
6.3
43.0
442
10
43
0.52
Mar-21
<0.01
0.059
<0.005
0.14
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
17
200
6.4
16.9
345
22
9
0.26
Nov-21
0.035
0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
25
230
6.4
21.9
320
6
14
0.29
Dec-05
<0.01
0.45
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.1
MW-5S
Oct-06
<0.01
0.121
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
7
May-07
<0.01
0.218
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
4.7
Oct-07
<0.01
0.278
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
4.9
Jun-08
<0.01
0.046
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
8.7
Jan-09
<0.01
0.051
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
10
Jun-09
<0.01
0.058
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
13
Dec-09
<0.01
0.056
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
17
Jun-10
<0.01
0.057
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
12
Dec-10
<0.01
0.102
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
14
Jun-11
<0.01
0.064
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
17
Dec-11
<0.01
0.087
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
I <0.01
1 21
Page 5of9
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2021 11.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Sample
Location / ID
Date
D
0'
oo
°'
C'
3
0-
3
C'
5
o
0
C'
v 3
r
O
Q
S
C
3
C'
cn
<'
mCD
cn
c
N
o
v
°
m
0_
C
-O
=
Q
cc
m
m
C'
v i3
_
0
o CL
n <'
3 �'
Z c
6
Q
v �'
O
CD
m'C-
3 -'.
<
o
m
p'
x0(
< 0
(c c0 <
r CD Q
NC 2L Ground Water Standard
(mg/1)
1 0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Jun-12
<0.01
0.095
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
22
Dec-12
<0.01
0.131
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
25
Jun-13
<0.01
0.025
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
22
Dec-13
<0.01
0.088
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
21
Jun-14
<0.01
0.052
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
14
Dec-14
<0.01
0.082
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
21
Monitor Well Abandoned on 4/17/15 by
NCDOT and
replaced
on
6/11/18 by MW-5RS
MW-5RS
Jun-18
<0.015
0.098
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
12
420
6.9
23.9
454
7
45
3.37
Jan-19
<0.015
0.10
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
3.4
260
6.6
12.6
382
2
78
0.99
Jun-19
<0.015
0.11
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1.0
320
7.0
25.3
594
9
-106
0.17
Mar-20
<0.015
0.09
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
3.1
230
6.6
16.4
363
4
-13
1.10
Nov-20
<0.015
0.10
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
3.1
290
7.0
22.0
477
1
-17
0.32
Mar-21
<0.015
0.07
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.3
210
6.4
18.2
297
3
143
0.69
Nov-21
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.8
300
7.0
22.8
450
3
24
0.47
Dec-05
<0.01
0.17
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
8.1
MW-513
Oct-06
<0.01
0.236
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6
May-07
<0.01
0.227
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.8
Oct-07
<0.01
0.258
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.6
Jun-08
<0.01
0.254
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
10
Jan-09
<0.01
0.255
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
10
Jun-09
<0.01
0.261
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
17
Monitor Well Abandoned on 4/17/15 by
NCDOT and
replaced
on
6/11/18 by MW-5RD
MW-5RD
Jun-18
<0.01
0.15
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
26
230
7.3
23.0
327
20
29
0.12
Jan-19
<0.01
0.22
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
17
230
7.4
11.9
374
10
-125
730.47
Jun-19
<0.01
0.21
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
14
250
7.3
24.0
388
9
-94
0.21
Mar-20
<0.01
0.25
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
11
240
7.3
16.2
383
4
-1
2.09
Nov-20
I <0.01
1 0.22
<0.001
I <0.01
I <0.01
1 <0.0002
<0.01
I <0.01
1 7.91
2401
7.31
21.51
3841
10
-1201
0.67
Page 6of9
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2021 11.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
o
Q
v
cc
_
0
O
CD
D
oo
Q
o
cn
m(D
o�
Z c
m' CL
O o
Sample
°'
3
0
r
S
3
cn
m
F E
6
m
E ,< O
Location / ID
Date
c'
�'
c'
°'
m
Q
�'
5
<'
m
m
n
=
�'
v m
<'
3 �'
v �'
< 0
cQ <
r(D Q
�
NC 2L Ground Water Standard
(mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
1 0.001
0.02
1 0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Mar-21
<0.01
0.096
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
4.7
140
7.4
18.6
265
4
136
1.77
Nov-21
<0.01
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.0
190
7.4
21.6
321
1
-45
1.05
Dec-05
<0.01
1.3
<0.001
<0.01
0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
174
MW-6
Oct-06
<0.01
0.816
<0.001
<0.01
0.013
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
510
May-07
<0.01
0.312
<0.001
<0.01
0.032
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
220
Nov-07
<0.01
0.12
<0.001
<0.01
0.074
0.00026
<0.01
<0.01
290
Jun-08
<0.01
0.08
<0.001
<0.01
0.054
0.00091
<0.01
<0.01
490
Jan-09
<0.01
0.066
NR
NR
0.014
<0.0002
NR
NR
560
Jun-09
0.018
0.155
NR
NR
0.016
0.00026
NR
NR
430
Dec-09
0.014
0.126
<0.001
<0.01
0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
220
Jun-10
0.109
0.313
<0.001
<0.01
0.155
0.0003
<0.01
<0.01
300
Dec-10
0.018
0.138
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
350
Jun-11
<0.10
0.717
<0.01
<0.10
<0.10
0.00095
<0.10
<0.10
460
Dec-11
<0.01
0.148
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
260
Jun-12
<0.05
0.156
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.05
<0.01
330
Dec-12
0.031
0.131
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
0.012
<0.01
270
Jun-13
<0.01
0.152
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
270
Dec-13
<0.05d
0.247
<0.005d
<0.05d
<0.05d
<0.0002
<0.05d
<0.05d
300
Jun-14
0.0189
0.193
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
260
Dec-14
0.099
0.155
<0.005d
<0.05d
0.122
<0.0002
<0.05d
<0.05d
660
Jun-18
0.043
0.047
<0.005
<0.01
0.045
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1,000
6,300
3.9
25.3
9,665
0
196
0.78
Jan-19
0.039
0.077
<0.005
<0.01
0.022
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
870
3,600
3.8
8.3
4,993
4
290
975.76
Jun-19
0.083
0.086
<0.005
<0.01
0.074
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
760
7,100
3.8
22.0
11,164
5
45
0.20
Mar-20
0.073
0.11
<0.005
<0.01
0.160
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
740
7,000
3.7
16.6
11,118
2
246
0.28
Nov-20
0.066
0.078
<0.005
<0.01
0.085
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
820
7,700
3.5
23.0
9,811
1
294
0.20
Mar-21
0.055
0.075
<0.005
<0.01
0.052
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
600
5,800
3.8
17.6
8,772
1
105
0.26
Nov-21
5
<0.005
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
790
5,500
3.7
20.2
9,522
0
231
0.30
Page 7 of 9
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2021 11.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
o
Q
CD
v
cc
(D
_ 0
3
O
CD
j.
D
oo
N
Q
o
(D
m
cn
°
(') -O
m m
Q
o c
Zc
CD XX
m QQ
O�
Sample
°'
3
0
r
cn
c
CD
m
S
0 m
o
Location / ID
Date
M.
c)
C
C
3
C"
°
CD
n
C
C
3
<.
N
�-
-6
=
C" C
V
n<
3
Q
m
3 -� �'
<�
cQ <
r 3 Q
NC 2L Ground Water Standard
(mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
1 0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Dec-05
0.038
<0.
<0.001
<0.01
0.093
<0.01
<0.01
379
MW-7
Oct-06
0.03
0.059
<0.001
<0.01
0.053
<0.01
<0.01
500
May-07
0.017
<0.1'
<0.001
<0.01
0.047
0.0003
<0.01
<0.01
460
Nov-07
0.029
<0.001
<0.01
0.124
0.00072
<0.01
<0.01
250
Jun-08
0.019
0.042
<0.001
<0.01
0.072
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
420
Jan-09
0.022
0.052
<0.001
<0.01
0.088
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
500
Jun-09
0.072
0.08
<0.001
<0.01
0.171
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
500
Dec-09
0.128
0.123
<0.01
<0.01
0.273
0.0006
<0.10
<0.10
490
Jun-10
0.208
0.172
<0.01
<0.01
0.379
0.0002
<0.10
<0.10
530
Dec-10
0.23
0.255
<0.01
<0.01
0.649
0.00057
<0.10
<0.10
590
Jun-11
0.134
0.159
<0.01
<0.10
0.396
0.00033
<0.10
<0.10
540
Dec-11
0.107
0.172
<0.01
<0.10
0.468
<0.0002
<0.10
<0.10
640
Jun-12
0.059
0.12
<0.005
<0.05
0.27
<0.0002
<0.05
<0.05
580
Dec-12
<0. I U0d
0.158
<0.01
<0.10
0.397
<0.0002
<0.10
<0.10
700
Jun-13
<0.100d
0.114
<0.01d
<0.10d
0.19
<0.0002
<0.10d
<0.10d
600
Dec-13
0.07
0.119
<0.05d
<0.050d
0.235
<0.0002
<0.050d
<0.050d
470
Jun-14
0.078
0.093
<0.002d
<0.007d
0.139
<0.0002
<0.025d
<0.010d
670
Dec-14
0.167
0.205
<n nFri
<0.050d
0.553
<0.0002
<0.050d
<0.050d
710
Jun-18
0.041
0.1
0.0074
<0.02
0.089
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
770
9,400
3.8
23.0
13,584
2
243
1.37
Jan-19
0.089
0.097
<0.005
<0.01
0.190
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
920
8,100
3.8
8.1
10,375
2
250
0.97
Jun-19
0.077
0.16
0.012
<0.01
0.160
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
630
10,000
3.7
21.5
15,916
9
128
0.31
Mar-20
0.093
0.13
0.012
<0.01
0.260
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
770
10,000
4.0
12.0
16,317
5
193
0.41
Nov-20
0.089
0.14
005
<0.01
0.260
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
640
12,000
3.5
20.9
16,203
3
259
0.24
Mar-21
0.080
0.092
<0.005
<0.01
0.160
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
670
8,000
3.8
16.0
12,734
8
186
0.25
Nov-21
0.090
0.13
<0.005
<0.01
0.270
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
700
10,000
3.7
20.9
15,392
4
205
0.27
MW-8
May-07
0.025
<0.001
<0.01
0.024
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
400
Nov-07
0.03
<0.001
<0.01
0.038
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
430
Jun-08
0.031
0.048
<0.001
<0.01
0.027
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
300
Jan-09
0.028
0.039
NRI
NR
0.032
<0.00021
NRI
NR
350
Page 8of9
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2021 11.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Sample
Location / ID
Date
D
0'
oo
°'
C'
3
0-
3
C'
5
o
0
C'
v 3
r
O
Q
S
C
3
C'
cn
<'
mCD
cn
c
N
o
v
°
m
0_
C
-O
=
Q
cc
m
m
C'
v i3
_
0
CL
o
n <'
3 �'
Z c
6
Q
Z, �'
O
CD
in' C- o
m
3 -'. p'
<
x0
< 0
(c c0 <
r CD Q
NC 2L Ground Water Standard
(mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Jun-09
0.159 0.114 NR NR 0.173
0.0003
NR
NR
460
Dec-09
0.569 0.286j <0.016 <0.050 0.376j
0.0002
<0.135
<0.095
460
Jun-10
0.366 0.232 <0.016 <0.050 0.283
0.0002
<0.135
<0.095
500
Dec-10
0.267 0.243 <0.01 <0.100 0.369
0.0013
<0.100
<0.100
470
Jun-11
0.207 0.223 <0.01 <0.100 0.103
<0.0002
<0.100
<0.100
410
Dec-11
0.321 <0.01 <0.100
<0.0002
<0.100
<0.100
270
Jun-12
0.146 0.169 <0.005 <0.05 0.199
<0.0002
<0.05
<0.05
580
Dec-12
0.11 0.168 <0.01 <0.100 0.234
<0.0002
<0.10
<0.10
580
Jun-13
0.14 0.172 <0.01d <0.100d 0.169
<0.0002
<0.10d
<0.10d
620
Dec-13
0.126 0.177 <0.05d <0.050d 0.211
<0.0002
<0.050d
<0.050d
510
Jun-14
0.154 0.13 <0.002d <0.007d 0.168
<0.0002
<0.025d
<0.010d
700
Dec-14
0.124 0.143 <0.05d <0.050d 0.263
<0.0002
<0.050d
<0.050d
620
Jun-18
0.055 0.056 <0.005 <0.02 0.10
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1,000
8,400
3.9
19.0
11,539
0
125
0.69
Jan-19
0.1 0.093 <0.005 <0.01 0.100
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
870
7,800
3.8
9.2
11,013
5
216
0.64
Jun-19
0.092 0.092 <0.005 <0.01 0.190
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
780
9,900
3.9
20.5
14,721
2
92
0.33
Mar-20
0.09 0.1 <0.005 <0.01 0.150
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
710
8,100
3.9
13.3
13,074
38
251
0.76
Nov-20
0.078 0.092 <0.005 <0.01 0.230
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
660
16,000
3.4
20.4
13,803
5
204
0.59
Mar-21
Monitor well unable to be sampled due to biological hazel
Nov-21
1 0.071 0.089 <0.005 <0.01 1 0.240
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1 610
7,3001
3.9
19.51
12,230
91
2351
0.29
All concentrations in milligrams per liter (mg/L) unless otherwise noted
NE - Not established
-- - Not sampled
Bold with gray background indicates exceedance of NC 2L Groundwater Standard
Page 9of9
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2021 11.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX A2
SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
O
xQ
O
Q
(D
0).
N
O
O
(D
(7
7
<
D
W
a
o
CD
cn
n m
o c
c
v' 0.
O
Sample
m
°'
3
o
r
CD
-
�_
C
o
m y
� LT
Location / ID
Date
'
3
v C
°n)
m
V
`
m
o
m
NC 2B Surface Water Standard -
Class C (ug/1)
0.15
1 NE
1 0.002 h
0.05 h
0.025
1 0.0000121
0.005
1 0.00006
1 NE
I NE
1 6.0 - 9.0
1 NE
I NE
1 50
1 NE
1 >5.0
04/03/03
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.005
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
12
SW-01
06/22/04
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<2.0
12/01 /05
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.3
10/06/06
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Surface Water - Upstream
05/04/07
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.6
10/22/07
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
3.8
06/18/08
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
2.5
01/14/09
<0.01
<0.10
NR
NR
<0.01
<0.0002
NR
NR
5.6
06/24/09
<0.01
0.03
NR
NR
<0.01
<0.0002
NR
NR
<5
12/16/09
<0.01
0.048
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.2
06/30/10
<0.01
0.032
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/14/10
<0.01
0.025
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
06/27/11
<0.01
0.041
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/19/11
<0.01
0.025
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/18/12
<0.01
0.028
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
06/25/13
<0.01
0.04
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
04/13/12
<0.01
0.025
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.3
06/27/14
<0.01
0.03
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/17/14
<0.01
0.027
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
06/28/18
<0.015
0.031
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
73
6.95
28.46
101
NM
-2.5
4.2
01 /21 /19
<0.015
0.090
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
6.1
79
7.84
6.50
107
11.0
37.1
19.2
06/17/19
<0.015
0.058
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.7
110
8.21
27.00
91
139.0
-130.0
2.1
03/09/20
<0.015
0.046
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
3.4
110
6.65
13.00
176
14.4
-45.6
8.4
11 /09/20
<0.015
0.032
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.8
91
6.79
15.20
94
9.7
26.2
4.2
03/26/21
<0.015
0.031
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.0
66
6.68
19.20
92
39.0
126.5
6.5
11 /01 /21
<0.015
0.027
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.3
75
7.32
14.40
77
13.9
35.4
8.2
04/03/03
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.005
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
12
SW-02
06/22/04
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<2.0
12/01 /05
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.3
10/06/06
<0.01
0.09
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Surface Water - Downstream
05/04/07
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.6
10/22/07
DRY
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
3.8
08/07/08
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
2.5
01/14/09
<0.01
<0.10
NR
NR
<0.01
<0.0002
NR
NR
5.6
06/24/09
<0.01
0.088
NR
NR
<0.01
<0.0002
NR
NR
<5
12/16/09
<0.01
0.025
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.2
06/30/10
DRY
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/14/10
<0.01
0.034
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
06/27/11
DRY
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/19/11
<0.01
0.027
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/18/12
<0.01
0.031
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
06/25/13
<0.01
0.037
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
04/13/12
<0.01
0.023
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.3
06/27/14
<0.01
0.038
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/17/14
<0.01
0.027
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
06/28/18
<0.015
0.089
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
130
6.98
29.68
369
90.0
-0.4
0.7
01 /21 /19
<0.01
0.027
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
7
100
5.81
3.60
171
6.6
139.6
14.2
06/17/19
<0.01
0.052
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
150
5.76
26.10
225
23.4
44.2
1.6
03/09/20
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
4.9
98
6.94
13.40
166
5.2
-39.0
9.8
11 /09/20
<0.015
0.039
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.1
91
6.41
19.30
133
11.0
-72.0
13.0
03/25/21
<0.015
0.026
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.8
66
7.16
20.40
65
16.2
65.1
9.9
11 /09/20
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.5
67
6.8
18.3
325.3
11.4
63.4
3.78
11 /01 /21
<0.015
0.048
<0.005
<0.01
I <0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
5.3
1101
6.71
17.11
184.51
6.98
-8.71
2.48
Page 1 of 2
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2021 11.xisx/Table A2-Historic SurfaceWater

APPENDIX A2
SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Sample
Location / ID
Date
D
m
co
°'
c'
Q
3
c'
s
o
o B
c'
v 3
r
Q
-
c
Z
m
c'
u)
<'
m
(n
v
m
4
o
a
o
-
N
a
=
Q
m
(D CD
N�
n(D
m °'
c' c
V m
_�
o c
<'
3 g
c
z 6
C n
v
O
x)
i
v
17
°
�C
iv' a
0
-
< 0
O
N.
p
<-
0.
O
cQ
r
NC 2B Surface Water Standard -
Class C (ug/I)
0.15
1 NE
1 0.002 "
0.05 "
0.025
1 0.0000121
0.005
1 0.00006
1 NE
I NE
1 6.0 - 9.0
1 NE
I NE
1 50
1 NE
1 15.0
05/04/07
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
2.4
SW-03
10/22/07
DRY
06/18/08
<0.01
0.089
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
3.3
01/14/09
<0.01
<0.10
NR
NR
<0.01
<0.0002
NR
NR
20
Surface Water - Downstream
06/24/09
<0.01
0.087
NR
NR
<0.01
<0.0002
NR
NR
<5
12/16/09
<0.01
0.075
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
14
06/30/10
<0.01
0.328
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
47
12/14/10
<0.01
0.074
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
16
06/27/11
DRY
12/19/11
<0.01
0.065
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
8
12/18/12
<0.01
0.067
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.5
06/25/13
<0.01
0.087
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
7.4
04/13/12
<0.01
0.051
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
23
06/27/14
<0.01
0.038
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/17/14
<0.01
0.08
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
9.9
06/28/18
<0.015
0.032
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
76
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
01/21/19
<0.015
0.03
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
31
160
5.6
6.3
257
14.5
138
13.1
06/17/19
<0.015
0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<
99
5.7
26.4
235.5
19.7
48.4
5.06
03/09/20
<0.015
0.035
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
9.8
94
6.3
10.5
265.4
6.98
55.1
8.9
11/09/20
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.5
67
6.8
18.3
325.3
11.4
63.4
3.78
03/25/21
Unable to collect
sample
due to biological
hazard near
sampling location
11 /01 /21
<0.015
0.026
<0.005
10.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
9.3
82
6.5
20.7
172.8
7.28
34.6
3.14
All concentrations in micrograms per liter (ug/L) unless otherwise noted
NE - Not established
-- - Not sampled
NM - Not measured
Bold indicates exceedance of NC 2B Water Quality Standard
h = hardness dependent dissolved metal standard
Page 2 of 2
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2021 11.xlsx/Table A2-Historic SurfaceWater

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT— NOVEMBER 2021
APPENDIX B FIELD SHEETS
November 2021
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology January 19, 2022
P:\Projects\0397281 ReUse CAP Implementation Swift Cr.DW\Post Closure Monitoring\2021-11 GWS\Swift Creek Water Quality Monitoring Report DRAFT TW_bpw.docx

ERM
Bottle Order/Label Sheet
Site: Swift Creek
ERM Project Number: 0397281
%BOTTLE LABEL
water Level
Metals
(6010)
Sulfate (
(300)
TDS
(2540C)
*MW-OIS-WG-202003
4�.77
X
X
X
MW-0ID-WG-202003
G UI
X
X
X
MW-02S-WG-202003
LI,;� (
X
X
X
MW-02D-WG-202003
t-I.7Z
X
X
X
MW-03-WG-202003
-
X
X
X
MW-04-WG-202003
(7.` Ll
X
X
X
MW-05RS-WG-202003
7, ; (
X
X
X
MW-05RD-WG-202003
'f
X
X
X
MW-06-WG-202003
i .q2
X
X
X
MW-07-WG-202003
�,
X
X
X
MW-08-WG-202003
3
X
X
X
SW-01-WG-202003
X
X
X
SW-02-WG-202003
X
X
X
SW-03-WG-202003
X
X
X
FD-01-WG-202003
X
X
X
AX
�..wl,.......:
x..
..,, �.::.,
X7
SUM (Bottle Count): 16 16 16
Notes
Please include:
- 1 trip blank per cooler.
At least 1 CoC per cooler.
1 custody seal per cooler.
Prepaid shipping labels, if possible.
*Collect FD-01 at MW-01S
Key:
=Normal sample
= Duplicate sample
= QAQC sample
= Extra set for breakag,
ERM Field Team Note: add the sample day in dd format to the end of the sample iD (i.e, MW-C

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
>ttNt
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other) Maht�on
Sample ID:
W. ^
W (J —Z 2
Date:
2
Time: 6613
Sampling Personnel (circle one : n Woodruff ohn Haffn r
Weather Conditions (circle one): nn
, Partl Cloudy, Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well T pe: F sh Surlace Completion, ti up Com lelio Well Tag Present: es No
Weli Locked: No Lock Present:
No Well ID info on Tag: e , No
o
Well Bolted: es No Well Cap: Well Cap Condition: c
, Replace, Other:
Well Pad Corldifion, Cracked, Replace, Other: Well Location: r s Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well .D.): Screen Length: 57 uut 1s, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): (1) Well Diameter: 2 q, e, a
Total Volume Purged: i' Casing Type: v ,steel
Purge Rate: mUmin Sampling Device: a, Monsoon, Orundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type:P h e Measuring Point: Top o a g other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.): Color:
a Odor: Yes, N
Time:
min
Volume
Pur ed
DTW:
feet
Temp
cc)
pH
Sid units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria 2
(gallop»-
(see note
below)3
+1.
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 My
+/-
10%4
60
1
CO
5.
$
J
6.
5
Y
o,"
-
s
-2.
1�oo036
S
-I&
t9x
9)T
,13
0.8
2 •0
0,2
u
327
O
-22a
3s
oA
Or
—a •2
6
e
0
3'
Oe26
-23,(
1 S
YB
5,
23
-2G•
500
5e
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro/ ql + r-
Official Sampling Dale & Time' I (l/I /L ` IS 5J "—" I ~W r"{
�Zoa4i`Id`o
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested' Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab.
Metals solo HNO3 25 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300
TDS 254OG
Notes:
(1)-0 vedepth to bottom
of well until after paging and spl'ng forefoot leswing pentlfines Natmay be resting on the well boMm.
(z)-saer�<so�aOrders brand On mme most recent tons trunks meaamemenn.
(J) -Total tl,axtloxn hwell to be less Nen 0.1 m (0.32 e). Paging rela to be lowered as necessaryto keep arawaovm below 0.1 m (0.32 S.
(4)W IO%vMen Val)=sendi : NTUs.
(b)-DO is not aO Volume seal)=g,on rule:
(e)-ORPa not a$aminonnedorsfor One
me MKinAvmersampling'' SE sadmtl OperagPmocedur
(])-ORPq not a steMlizafion cmeam for tl,e'Olev,Wmter samplv,g'SESD standard Opnaune Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
Site Name: Swift Creek--y ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (rNanitar-Weft DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other)
Sample ID:
iVnW - -- 6.(6-:zc'9 6Eel
Date:
Time:
L T�
Sampling Personnel circle
one): Jordan Woodruff
John Haffner
Weather Conditions circle
one): au Partly Cloudy,
Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well T pe: Flush Surface Completion, Stick Up Com letio
Well Tag
Present:
1 ems, No
Well Locked: s, No
Lock Present: No
Well ID info on Tag:
No
Well Bolted: Yes, M1Jryp
Well Cap: Yes,
Well Cap
Condition:
c o�e , Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition: o
d, Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Location:
, Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well T.D.:
7h 7
Screen Length:
5, R, 155
20
Depth to Water (D.T.W):
Well Diameter: Q, 4, s, a
Total Volume Purged:
Casing Type:
V Steel
Purge Rate: .1670
mumin
Sam lin Device:
ns tic,
Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
TubingType: Polyethylene
Measurin Point:
Top of casing other:
Pump Intake (ft below fil 3 a7
Color:
Odor: Yes, '(d
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
pc
pH
std units
SpC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
my
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalizalion
Critenb2
(gallons)
(see note
below)'
+/-
3%
+I-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10 %
+/-
10 my
+/.
10%,
5 ,2o
04n'1T
I
IZt�
-39
_3r1.3
- Z
erw�
O.'�i
Q�t
"2�2g'
d sJ
j0_ Qa7
^.i,
.` f3
2f 4'S
D'. 7
_s-IT4
3
I jufoj
67
o
I'
20-1
6LW
12n.t
GJ. I
i
1,31
' 2r
1- 1
2&7
16 q9
120&.
.,/0
_ilo,,
11, 22
20 q
6,19
fr�;-
J-"i#
Z
077
_3t
Field Parameters measured with: Ysl Pro/
Official Sampling Date & Time:
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010 HNW 29 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300
TDS 2540C
Notes:
-Do not manage earth to bottom ofwell until aper purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines pact maybe resting on One well botlom.
(2)-Stabilization nlerla based on Wee
(3)4110 %datum InweG roer less B,mi 011rm(0.32fl)e PulB�Beare lobe lowered asnecessary fokeep drawdown below 0.1 m(0.32 fi).
(5) H-f0%when Nrbidily Is over 10 NiUs.
(5)well uma(Bakio.W1alb a np:
(E) -OO not as stabilization
izetlon criterionforte
forte
vafersamplinB' SEED Elandarard operating
Procedure.
p) -oaPla not aatabe2aaon ememn mrlhe ^crounawaterramvnnq sas0 slanaem opemunB Procedure,

WATER MATRIX SAMPLINQ
FIELD DATA FORM
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM',tProject Number:
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surtace Water, Potable WSW; other) NoY7 a/'' Lli
0397281
Sample lD
2 ��b
Date: 2
Time:
Sampling Personnel (circle
one): Jordan Woodruff
John Haffner
Weather Conditions circle
one): u Partly Cloudy,
06�*�,Zaih,.Gfher
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, ick Up Completion
Well Tag
Present:
eNo
Well Locked es No
Lock Present:a
No
Well ID info on `fag.
yes No
Well Bolted: No
Well Cap: Yes,
Well Cap
Condition
cod Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition. Goo , Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Location: Grass,
Asp all, Concret ootl ,Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (F.D.):
Screen Length:
51 0 15,
20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): t')
Well Diameter:
a, e, 8
Total Volume Purged:
Casing Type:
v , steel
Purge Rate:
mL/min
Sampling Device:
Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Po to ene
Measuring Point:
pot Casin
other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.):
Color: L ectr
Odor: Yes, o
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp4stdunits
(Gc
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria'
(gallons)
(see note
belo,d)33%
+/-
+I-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 my
+/-
10%4
0-
U-
-O6.
21•
—!
.8
G
0s"
Field Parameters measured with vs1
`Prro1/ 137`
Official Sampling Date & Time: II1 112' OU
Samples Collected Analysis Reguested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals solo HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300
TDS 2540G arbitration criton Miss recent consurnifirmasurements
Notes:
(t) Do not measure tlepN to bottom o(well are after purging and aempfN9 to reduce resaape,m'ma fines t,al maybe resOn9 an Newell bplfom-
�S�- Total tlavdavmeNwell slodbe less Nanoo.f mte.32 fi)eP Oengrefefpbe lovreretl as necessary to keep dmvgpvn, belowe.l m(0.32 P).
(4)Well
f0%Volume
en all=4y0overle NTUs.
(e)- oR Isnot e abbclizate critern Ima be
uponavemodeler sampling' aSE 9 nds ema Gpna4ng procedure
te
(i)-ORPk not asiabilizeOan aMnon far Ne "G,aundvmfersampli,g' SD Slantla,d Gpxa6ng Procedu,e.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek
Sample Type: ( omtor ell, DPT, Surface Water, Potable
ERM Project Number: 0397281
WSW; other)
Sample ID:
0i
Date:
E (A 2 i
Time:
I
Sampling Personnel circle one): Jordan Woodruff
John Haffner
Weather Conditions circle
one): lgiiily, Partly Cloudy,
Cloudy, Rain, Other.
Well Type: Flush Surface Completio Stick U Compielf
Well Tag
Present:
'ies No
Well Locked: Wis, No
Lock Present: Vs, No
Well ID info on Tag:
des, No
Well Bolted: Yes, 70
Well Cap: Yes,
Well Cap
Condition: Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition: c00 , Cracked, Replace, Othel
Well Location: 99,
Asphalt, Concrete, Sods Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well T.D.:
}r -
4Screen Length:
5, 15,
o)
20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): 1t)
(. 7; Y
Well Diameter:
.h`! 4, e,
a
Total Volume Purged:
Casing Type:
Q, Steel
Pur a Rate: `.' f ,00
mUmin
Sampling
Device:
eri l itic,
Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring
Point:
Top of Casing other:
Pump Intake (ft below MR):
6 f=l
Color:
C le
Odor: Yes,
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
eC
pH
std units
SpC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criterial
(gallons)
(see note
below)'
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 my
+/-
10%4
b
u5
-
s.;
0,7b
_Yqer
2.
,.
w
_ 1
I -
�ey-3
it
- r#l.7
-'+N
I7 '3 rJ
70
.ad
%-i4
t'(7$,.
^-ay
70i
ldi
K.
4
a171
01
-404
n.hro
1i0
(�.-to
.r�.
.f h`
r-177.G
?1y
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro / ( ��(✓ � �" i "� � "�
Official Sampling Date & Time: j i �l / 2 ( ��/ 71
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals solo NN03 2s Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300
TDS 2540C
Notes:
(1)-Do not measure depth to bottom of well untll after posting and sampling to reduce resuspendng Ines Ual maybe resting an Me weA boham.
(z)-Stabilization rumors based on three maameaamless co„aecawe maaaaramema.
(4)-T wan robe 10 NTUnO.im(o.ffitt). Posting stem be lowered as necessary to keep araveaown below 0.1 m(g.a2 if).
(4)N Vowhenfall=M Is over to NTUs.
(5) we0 Volume stabilization
with:
(7)-o nnmerionfor
or e 'GMe 'Groundwater
mamipgg' ESD SEED Standard Opeb'ng Procedure.
(n-ORP is not a sfabllhatlon cmeaan for Na "Orounawater samping' SESD sUnaa,a Operating Proceaum.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
Site Name:
Sample Type:
Swift Creek
( for
I, DPT, Surface Water, Potable
ERM Project
WSW; other)
Number: 0397281
Sample ID:
AAE„s
- �' '> --
kN x2.1911
2-
Date:
Time:
Sampling Personnel circle one):
Jordan Woodruff
John Haffner
Weather Conditions circle
one):
Ea , Partly Cloudy,
Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well Type:
Flush Surface Completion ick UPC
Well Tag
Present:
ppyy
Yes, 4Jd
Well Locked:
YQs, No
Lock Present:
`9e ,, No
Well ID info on Tag:
Yes, ado'
Well Bolted:
Yes,
Well Cap:
No
Well Cap
Condition: nq d, Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition: 0, Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Location: 61,
Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well T.D.:
20 if
Screen Length:
s, 10 16,
20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): 01
fj?_
Well Diameter:
CP 4, s, a
Total Volume
Purged:
Casing Type:
t&Steel
Pur a Rate:
!` ,?:7
mUmin
Sampling
Device:
tic,
Monsoon, 0rundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type:
Polyethylene
Measurin
Point:
Top of Casing other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.):
`5 rfi
Color:
.clea
Odor: Yes,
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feetstd
pH
units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Critena'
(gallons)
(see note
below)'0.1
+/-
unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 mV
+/-
10%"
n
O
35r
jq7
5b
}t,tgL)
i, �
q75
�/
y�5-
3
y
asf
of K
s'-7
1 'v
; a�
!
q.
s. IT
—
0 `7
c(
7,11
3 •a7
0��0
R
7.4
�
3t�0
`t6�
4V/ 0
(.71
( 10
}
S.`(1
7131
1t7.:;/0/
Ll'�-7
6.9'1
133�
Field Parameters measured with: Ysl Pro / HA01 2 (7 W
Official Sampling Date &Time: � (/2 121 &i I � 2
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals solo HNO3 28 Pace.Analylical
Sulfate Soo
TDS 2540C
Notes:
-Do not measure aepmmbOtto mmwell „nw aver purging and sampling mreduce resuspending firms died may belosing on Me well bottom..
(2)-sfabd eanencnfeaa based on Ihree most recent consecutive meawremenk.
(3)-Total drawtlown in well to be less Man 0.1 m (0.32 n). Pu,efnp rate to be lowered as necessary to keep amwdown befaw 0.f in (0.32 n).
(4) N-10%when lu,blai0.Is over 10 NTUs.
(b) Well Volume (gags O.on deft
(S)- oolanot
ot asta izaaon«ifedonn for
for Me Groundwaletersoming'SE Iandmdopem4ng Procedure.
(])-ORP Is not a stabilization cMedan far the'GrounAvalersampRng'SEso Standard opemang Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM;;��Project Number:
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other) !w I rf
0397281
Sample ID:
0"�
Date: I
21
Time: 2S
Sampling Personnel circle
one):
Jordan Woodruff
�hn Haling
Weather Conditions (circle
one):
S n Partly Cloudy,
Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well T a: Flush Surface Compietio , tic
u Co leuon
Well Tag
Present:
No
Well Locked. a , No
Lock Present: No
Well ID info on Tag:
No
Well Bolted: a Na-
Well Cap:
e , No
Well Cap
Condition.
, Replace, Other:
Well Pad CO ItlOn:
Good, Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Locatio s,
sphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (f.D.):
Screen Length:
51 015,
20
Depth to Water (D,T.1N): m
Well Diameter:
2 a, e, 8
Total Volume Purged:
Casing Type:
Pv , Steel
Purge Rate:
murrain
Sam tin Device:
eristalt Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
TubingType:olyethylene
Measuring Pant:
o or cas g
other:
Pump Intake (ft "P"):
Color:
Odor: Yesd6jo
Time:
min
Volume
Pure
DTW:
feet
Temp
^c
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
my
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria'
.(yrylftlffT
(see note
below)'
+I-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10mv
+/-
t0%'
2
V
d
2ION6.
KOO
is.
6 6
t�.
2000
a
D
o `t
YS
Ul
DD
1
z24.5
6.
23
0'
4A
I.`
<eDb
73.10
a4l
cuy
3
t
Mir
2b
3.
,.
6"
p0
2
p
D
5-
Field Parameters measured with: vsl Pro/ livi'T
Official Sampling Date &Time' I(1�14I D2�
Samples Collected Analysis Requested Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010 HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300
TDS 2540C
ON tes;
(I) -Do not Measure depN to bottom ofrvell untaselllobe il after purging and sampling to reduce resozperding fines Nat maybe res4ng on Nevrell boflam.
(2)-StabT a0on nHedn based an tree most resent <onseagvo measuremen6.
(3) Total tlmxdoan in y a o u less Nan 0.1 m (0,32 p). Puging or [a lobe loweretl as necessary to keep Nawdovm below 0.l m (O.J2 a).
(5) WeiIVooluenialo=y041d to NTUs.
(b) Well Volume(gap=Oism smaller
(el-G adea forMeMe'GrouAvalersampling' aSE standardtandard Stanford
crooninProcedure.
(]) � ORPk not a�tab sterilization cnledan for Ne'Gm,ndwatersamping' SEW standard Opae0n0 Proredxe.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
ERM
Site Name; Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (go=nftor WiA, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other)
Sample ID: M LA/
Date: iir 2(
Time: I ��Ira
Sampling Personnel circle
one): Jordan Woodruff
John Haffner
Weather Conditions circle
one): un Partly Cloudy,
Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well Type: ash Surface Com le` U ' Stick Up Completion
Well Tag
Present:
es, No
Well Locked: Yes,
Lock Present: z No
Well ID info on Tag:
No
Well Bolted: e$�s. No
eS
Well Cap: No
Well Cap
Condition:
a , Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition: Good, Cracked, Replace, Other
Well Location: r
, Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (T.D.):
L
Screen Length:
5, 0 15,
20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): (1)
7•
Well Diameter: a� 4, s, e
Total Volume Purged:
20? vn
Casing Ty e:
Steel
Purge Rate: '.� 1,00
mUmin
Sampling Device:
eristafff
Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point:
Top of Casing
other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.):
p' g' ¢"
Color: h+-✓
Odor: Yes,
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
ec
pH
std units
SpC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria2
y L
(gellerls)
(see note
below)'
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 my
+/-
10%4
',KEY
22.(
e,�j•
"t�lJ-6
v,75
t-1.(eraof
`L2. Z
'��b
f.l�`f. J
-lira'
2--
. (y
(703 %3r2n.�.
a r<'
fl9:'J
.0IT
2Z.Z
7.00
��1,
26,
110f
1 h nD
q t,"
24t
G-lot
( f+5
=x rJ t7J
•Kh
22 .
G-.
�.. Qsi
O-wl
26
° t D
Field Parameters measured with:
Official Sampling Date & Time:
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals solo HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate sop
TDS 2540C
Notes:
(1) be -Do not measure depN to bottom Orwell until after purring and sampfng to seduce resuspentlNO fines that maybe rastirg on Newell bottom.
StalAzalion arttedabased on
(4)-Total whonto InweA toer lossthanNano011sm(0.02fl)ePurging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep drawdown below 0.1 m(0.32 S.
(4)WF10°/urna(lal) 0,Isoverf0NTas.
(b) Well snots stay=o.o41d36:
(E)- DOIsseta afabNizatloncriterion for roundwater aargo'GEED Statlmdd Opera,0Procedure.
(])-ORP Is not a slabAizatlan criterion for me 'Groundwater sampling' SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
Site Name: Swift Creek
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable
ERM Project
WSW; other)
Number: 0397281
Sample ID:
202j
j of
Data: 2
Time:
Sampling Personnel circle
one):
Jordan Woodruff
o ffner
Weather Conditions circle
one):
unn , Partly Cloud
oud , Rain, Other
Well T e: Flush
to Is Up Completion
Well Tag
Present:
Yes, No
Well Locked: Yes, o
oc Present: Yes, No
Well ID info on Tag:
Yes, No
Well Bolted: Yes, No
Well Cap:
Yes, No
Well Cap
Condition: Good, Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition: Good, Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Location: Grass, Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well T.D.:
7,
Screen Length:
5 10, 15,
20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): 11)
7 ryi
Well Diameter:
z, 45 a, 8
Total Volume Purged:
�,
Casin Type:
;)steel
Purge Rate:
m min
Sampling Device:
P vista '
Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
TubingType: olyeth lene,
Measurin Point:
of Casl
other:
Pump Intake (ft
a
.):
Color:
Odor: Yes, N ,
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
eC
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Slabalizalion
Criteria'
M
(Mg1151is)
(see note
below)'
+/.
3%
+/-
0.1unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10MV
+/-
1o%d
1i
>
0
`iu
.5
�L
2
2
m1
"i
u
f�,o
22a1ziq
i`t
ro
oaf
P 6
5 2 A
i,la
`
Field Parameters measured with:
Official Sampling Date &Time:
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals sour HNO3 2e Pace Analytical
Sulfate Soo
TDS 25400
Noes:
In- -Do not na1 measure aepm to bottom of well u,ml anarpmelna and aampr„a to reduce reauspeasking ethan uea met maybe raen„a on me well honour.
-Stablization Me,la based on mree most recent<onseculive measurements.
(4)-Total wIwn wn Nweg to be less TUB.g.1 m (0.32 n). Pouring rate to be lowered as necessary to keep drawtlown below 0.1 m (0.32 IS,
(5) won VRuben Wmlairy Isover
cDc a NTUs.
(6) wen volume (gag = dorl ilea
(7)- OOIsnot a as ubaizagonc,lleaoncarme"Groundwaterasmpmg"SEED Standard Operating
Procedure.
(])-ORP h net a ambRiutian criterion forme "Groundwater sampling' SESO Standard Operatl,g Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
Site Name: Swift Creek
Sample Type: ( o
ERM Project
1, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW, other)
Number: 0397281
Sample ID:
J r Ei. V.1r-
20l ('
Date:
(I z , f
Time:
Sampling Personnel circle
one):
Jordan Woodruff
John Haffner
Weather Conditions (circle
one);
u , Partly Cloudy,
Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, 'ck Up Completio
Well Tag
Present:
Ke§, No
Well Locked: , No
Lock Present:
6Z No
Well ID info on Tag:
JrR, No
Well Bolted: Yes,
Well Cap:
1�sg , No
Well Cap
Condition: o Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition: o
,Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Location: a
,Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (T.D.:
' Lt f Screen
Length:
�}
5, t'9( 15,
20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): (11
is - j f--'�
Well Diameter:
Cz! a, s, a
Total Volume Purged:
Casin T
e:
Steel
Purge Rate: +� 1 C) C
mL/min
Sampling
Device:
Ejfistal' ,
Monsoon, Grundfos, Railer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring
Point:
Top of casing other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.):
7,
Color:
COY
Odor: Yes,
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet(CC)
Temp
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Cdteriat?
(gallons)
(see note
below)'
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 my
+/-
10%4
y
2 2
7�
E 7 3
0
7
j
6
7/J0
.-�7�
`)+r-
^J(e
n� zr
0.1jfq"
7-fSa-
y J
-O U✓
f .-rig
ZD -7
74
" 1�z&E
r9.r-r2
21q.5
.35i
a.T'
7°(
f-7o .
Q-3q
'2=S_3
LLh 3
QO
2.�JC*^
S.Ya
20. S
3-7`1
4h i2
L ";52
1 2261
in76
2,0
-3.7+f
5"72
O7 to
H31.x
3.5i
. c(Iq-
`tjy nQ
Field Parameters measured with: vsl Pro/
Official Sampling Date & Time: 1 [ �'L �Z 1 ( t-I i0
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals ee10 HNO3 2a Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300
TDs 2640C
Notes:
-Do no I are depth to bottom of well and after purging and seraphim to reduce resuspending fines Net maybe reachin- Tell be g an the well bottom.
(2)-SIabR 4one,Heela based an Wee most recent consecutive meesuremenfa.
p) V 10 drawdown N well to over
less than 0.1 m (0.32 Hj. Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep drewtlown belawe.i m (0.3211).
(4)H-1e%when Nrbitlilyisovio NTDs.
(6)Weg-DO Is not a(gali hedcrigM1:
(7)-OOfsnota aboasci liallanmtedonfor r Me 'Groundwater
saamplin 'SESSESD Standard Spending
Procedure.
(1)-ORP Is not a stabfi'vation c,Hedon for Ne'GraunM�aler sampling' SESO Standard OperalNg Pracedae.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
fl
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable
ERM Project Number: 0397281
WSW; other)
Sample ID:
°A p✓-;j
-
240L1I
;5y
Date:
2
Time:
f(
Sampling Personnel circle
one): Jordan
Woodruff
John Haffner
Weather Conditions circle
one):
unn Peril Cloud
, Cloudy, Rain, Other.
Well Type: Flush Surface Complelio Stick
Well Tag
Present:
12, No
Well Locked: �, No
Lock Present: ' eke,
No
Well ID info on Tag:
es No
Well Bolted: Yes, '®
Well Cap:
No
Well Cap
Condition: , Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition: CGogU, Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Location: era
, Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well
Screen Length:
5, 0�, 15,
20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): tl)
X. 7
Well Diameter: (� a, s, s
Total Volume Purged:
Casin T
e:
Pv , Steel
Pure Rate: "`
mL/min
Samplin
Device:
ris ic,
Monsoon, Grundfos, Sailer, Other.
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring
Point:
Top of Casing other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.):
7-
Color:
, t-e4A/
Odor: Yes,
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
aC
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Crileriag
(gallons)
(see note
below)'
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 mV
+/-
10 4
c79
7o
.J
20
3.72.
IT370
0.3`6
-20?
5. 7 `5
�l o
1� 2^
7f7
15`34
ZS> _
2
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro/! 2 j{{02 1.:Y
Official Sampling Date & Time: [ l / / / 2 ( I'4 f i7
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals solo HNO3 26 Pace Analytical
Sulfate sop
TDS 2540C
Notes:
(I) - Do not measure depth to bottom of took onel aflerpurgNH and sampling to reduce resuspending fines met maybe resdng an Nowetlbottom.
(2)-Spoliation crfleda based on Nree most resent [onsecuE've meesuremenh.
(4)+1-10 Wien wnNwell Lobe less Pon 0.1m(o.J2IT, Purging rate fa belowered as neceueryla keep dmwdom befaw 0.1 m(0.32 it).
(4)al-f Volumen aft= 0.04over 10 NTn3.
(5)- Well
-DO
not a (gap=OA41tl3M1:
(e)-o ezatlonn critunfor rthe
me'Greaurdyersamplingg' ESD SEED Standard Operating
PProcedur
IT)-oRP[la not e mobilization <iiledon for me "crounAvaler sampling'sE50 Standard apemling Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
ER[vt
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DIST, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other)
Sample lD:
Date: tC 2t
Time: L [
Sampling Personnel (circle one): J rdan Woodruff
oh Haffne
Weather Conditions (circle
one): ,Sun'hy, Partly Cl.udy,
Clouq , Rain, Other
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, Stick Up Completion
Well Tag
Present' Ye o
Well Locked: es` No
Lock Present: es No
Well ID info on Tag: Yes No
Well Bolted: es No
Well Cap: es, No
W¢II Cap
Condition o Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condltl0 o , Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Location: Grass, Asphalt, Concrete, ood Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (r.D.):
Screen Length:
s, op 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): (1)
Well Diameter:
4, s, s
Total Volume Purged:
Casing Type:
Steel
Purge Rate:
munnin
Sampling Device:
erist tic, Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
TubingT e: olyethylene
Measuring Point:
Top of Casing other:
Pump Intake (ft below
M.P.):
Color:
Odor: Yes, No
Time:
min
Volume
Pur ed
DTW:
feet
Temp
ac
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteriaz
(gauons)
(see note
below)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+I-
10 my
+/-
10%4
W
ri'
S'
3}
S
y
P
2
C:2� It1
Field Parameters measured with: vsl tPro(r /�� ((� �.p _
Official Sampling Date & Time: {C (/ ° ( / ( f ? /�''"'
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals solo HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300
TDS 2sa0C
Notes:
nl-Do not measve depth to bottom :)well unN agsr plll9ng and samplers to reduce ressspersfin9 fines that maybe resOng on nevmll bogom.
(2)-Slab3izaC'on ttilena basetl on three most recent consea,we measuremen6.
(J) Total dmlWovm A well to be less non 0.1 an (0.32 to. nursing rat: to belowxed asnecessaryto keep tlmwdovm below0.i an 10.32 fiI.
olgmen bag =0.is over 10 NTDs.
(6) Well Volume(Val anon heel
(g)-DOIsnotasdbilzab'oonilalonlo,the"Grauntlwaler sampling' SEW Standard
Operating Procedure.
(])-ORPh nolastabilize0on aite,lon for tl,e'Growtlrrzler samgog SD SWntlartl Operand Preretlure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
ERM
Site Name; Swift Creek
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT,
ERM Proiect Number: 0397281
ace , Potable WSW; other)
Sample ID:
Date:
Time:
Sampling Personnel circle
one):
Jordan Woodruff
John Haffner
Weather Conditions circle
one):
Sunny, Partly Cloudy,
Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, Stick Up Completion
Well Tag
Present: Yes, No
Well Locked: Yes, No
Lock Present: Yes, No
Well ID info on Tag: Yes, No
Well Bolted: Yes, No
Well Cap:
Yes, No
Well Cap
Condition: Good, Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition: Good, Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Location: Grass, Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well T.D.:
Screen Length:
5, lo, 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): t11
Well Diameter:
21 41 s, 8
Total Volume Purged:
Casing Type:
PVC, Steel
Purge Rate:
mUmin
Sampling Device:
Peristaltic, Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point:
Top of casing other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.):
Color:
Odor: Yes, No
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
°C
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria
(gallons)
(see note
below)"
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 mV
+/.
10%,
01,-
7-
B.iE
7 f
ti.
4Vv
-
F t
-
1�/Ft5�
-T.�TT-
Lof 13
172,if
�i. L
L.(
7-2.
Field Parameters measured with YslPro/qfttil 2{oo
(
Official Sampling Date & Time: ,r '� 1'/9- 1 [ /'�2 z le
r
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010 HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate soo
TDS 2540C
Notes:
(1)-Do not measure depN to page; in of well until after pwging and sempling to reduce resusDendng tines Naf maybe restmg on Newell bogam.
Stabileramm rdeda based on tree most recent consecutive measurements.
(3)-Total dmwtlown In well to be less Nan g.1 m (g.32 fl). Pmgtng rate to he towered as necessary to keep drawtlown beluwe.l in (0.32 fl).
(6)Well
Volume
(get) tlM1y le over le MUs.
(b)-DOVolume(gal)= min crufr
(7)-0 Mission for on
e'Groundwatundwater eamplinyg' ESD SESO StandarOperating procedure.
(])-One Is not alslabPrzatlon mledon for Ne'Grountlwalersamgling' SEGO EUntlartl Operating Procedure.

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT— NOVEMBER 2021
APPENDIX C LABORATORY DATA
November 2021
www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0397281 Client: ReUse Technology January 19, 2022
P:\Projects\0397281 ReUse CAP Implementation Swift Cr.DW\Post Closure Monitoring\2021-11 GWS\Swift Creek Water Quality Monitoring Report DRAFT TW_bpw.docx

0
aceAnalytical
Report of Analysis
ERM NC, Inc.
300 West Summit Avenue
Suite 330
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attention: Chris Means
Project Name: Swift Creek
Project Number: SEE EDD INFO
Lot Number:WK08047
Date Completed:12/02/2021
12/02/2021 4:55 PM
Approved and released by:
Project Manager I: Hannah K. Lucas
PCCRFO
24r
iANSI
National Accreditation Board
qe0
A C C R E D I T E D
TESTING LABORATORY
The electronic signature above is the equivalent of a handwritten signature.
This report shall not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written approval of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172
Tel:[phone] Fax:[phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 1 of 58

PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC
SC DHEC No: 32010001 NELAC No: E87653 NC DENR No: 329 NC Field Parameters No: 5639
Case Narrative
ERM NC, Inc.
Lot Number: WK08047
This Report of Analysis contains the analytical result(s) for the sample(s) listed on the Sample Summary
following this Case Narrative. The sample receiving date is documented in the header information
associated with each sample.
All results listed in this report relate only to the samples that are contained within this report.
Sample receipt, sample analysis, and data review have been performed in accordance with the most
current approved The NELAC Institute (TNI) standards, the Pace Analytical Services, LLC ("Pace")
Laboratory Quality Manual, standard operating procedures (SOPS), and Pace policies. Any exceptions to
the TNI standards, the Laboratory Quality Manual, SOPS or policies are qualified on the results page or
discussed below.
Pace is a TNI accredited laboratory; however, the following analyses are currently not listed on our TNI
scope of accreditation: Biological Tissue: All, Non -Potable Water: SGT-HEM EPA 1664B, Silica EPA
200.7, Boron, Calcium, Silicon, Strontium EPA 200.8, Bicarbonate, Carbonate, and Hydroxide Alkalinity
SM 2320 B-2011, Fecal Coliform SM 9221 C E-2006 & SM 9222D-2006, Strontium SW-846 6010D, VOC
SM 6200 B-2011, Drinking Water: VOC (excluding BTEX, MTBE, Naphthalene, & 1,2-dichloroethane)
EPA 524.2, Solid Chemical Material: TOC Walkley-Black.
If you have any questions regarding this report please contact the Pace Project Manager listed on the
cover page.
Inorganic non-metals
Samples -001, -002, -003, -004, -007, -008, -010, -011, -013, -014 and -015 were analyzed one day
outside of the 7-day holding time due to laboratory constraints.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmetal Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 2 of 58

PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC
Sample Summary
ERM NC, Inc.
Lot Number: WK08047
Sample Number
Sample ID
Matrix
Date Sampled
Date Received
001
MW-01 S-WG-2021 1101
Aqueous
11/01/20211550
11/04/2021
002
MW-01D-WG-20211101
Aqueous
11/01/20211535
11/04/2021
003
MW-02S-WG-20211101
Aqueous
11/01/20211710
11/04/2021
004
MW-02D-WG-20211101
Aqueous
11/01/20211715
11/04/2021
005
MW-03-WG-20211101
Aqueous
11/02/20211320
11/04/2021
006
MW-04-WG-20211101
Aqueous
11/02/20211325
11/04/2021
007
MW-05RS-WG-20211101
Aqueous
11/01/20211115
11/04/2021
008
MW-05RD-WG-20211101
Aqueous
11/01/20211140
11/04/2021
009
MW-06-WG-20211101
Aqueous
11/02/20211410
11/04/2021
010
MW-07-WG-20211101
Aqueous
11/01/20211415
11/04/2021
011
MW-08-WG-20211101
Aqueous
11/01/20211415
11/04/2021
012
SW-01-WS-20211101
Aqueous
11/02/20211420
11/04/2021
013
SW-02-WS-20211101
Aqueous
11/01/20211640
11/04/2021
014
SW-03-WS-20211101
Aqueous
11/01/20211430
11/04/2021
015
FD-01 -WG-2021 1101
Aqueous
11/01/2021
11/04/2021
(15 samples)
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 3 of 58

PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC
Detection Summary
ERM NC, Inc.
Lot Number: WK08047
Sample Sample ID
Matrix
Parameter
Method
Result
Q
Units
Page
001
MW-01 S-WG-2021 1101
Aqueous
Sulfate
300.0
380
mg/L
7
001
MW-01S-WG-20211101
Aqueous
TDS
SM 2540C-
6800
H
mg/L
7
002
MW-01 D-WG-2021 1101
Aqueous
Sulfate
300.0
16
mg/L
9
002
MW-01 D-WG-2021 1101
Aqueous
TDS
SM 2540C-
720
H
mg/L
9
002
MW-01 D-WG-2021 1101
Aqueous
Barium
6010D
0.027
mg/L
10
003
MW-02S-WG-20211101
Aqueous
TDS
SM 2540C-
360
H
mg/L
11
003
MW-02S-WG-20211101
Aqueous
Barium
6010D
0.20
mg/L
12
004
MW-02D-WG-20211101
Aqueous
Sulfate
300.0
1.1
mg/L
13
004
MW-02D-WG-20211101
Aqueous
TDS
SM 2540C-
320
H
mg/L
13
004
MW-02D-WG-20211101
Aqueous
Barium
6010D
0.066
mg/L
14
005
MW-03-WG-20211101
Aqueous
Sulfate
300.0
810
mg/L
15
005
MW-03-WG-20211101
Aqueous
TDS
SM 2540C-
2700
mg/L
15
006
MW-04-WG-20211101
Aqueous
Sulfate
300.0
25
mg/L
17
006
MW-04-WG-20211101
Aqueous
TDS
SM 2540C-
230
mg/L
17
006
MW-04-WG-20211101
Aqueous
Arsenic
6010D
0.035
mg/L
18
006
MW-04-WG-20211101
Aqueous
Barium
6010D
0.025
mg/L
18
007
MW-05RS-WG-20211101
Aqueous
Sulfate
300.0
2.8
mg/L
19
007
MW-05RS-WG-20211101
Aqueous
TDS
SM 2540C-
300
H
mg/L
19
008
MW-05RD-WG-20211101
Aqueous
Sulfate
300.0
6.0
mg/L
21
008
MW-05RD-WG-20211101
Aqueous
TDS
SM 2540C-
190
H
mg/L
21
009
MW-06-WG-20211101
Aqueous
Sulfate
300.0
790
mg/L
23
009
MW-06-WG-20211101
Aqueous
TDS
SM 2540C-
5500
mg/L
23
010
MW-07-WG-20211101
Aqueous
Sulfate
300.0
700
mg/L
25
010
MW-07-WG-20211101
Aqueous
TDS
SM 2540C-
10000
H
mg/L
25
010
MW-07-WG-20211101
Aqueous
Arsenic
6010D
0.090
mg/L
26
010
MW-07-WG-20211101
Aqueous
Barium
6010D
0.13
mg/L
26
010
MW-07-WG-20211101
Aqueous
Lead
6010D
0.27
mg/L
26
011
MW-08-WG-20211101
Aqueous
Sulfate
300.0
610
mg/L
27
011
MW-08-WG-20211101
Aqueous
TDS
SM 2540C-
7300
H
mg/L
27
011
MW-08-WG-20211101
Aqueous
Arsenic
6010D
0.070
mg/L
28
011
MW-08-WG-20211101
Aqueous
Barium
6010D
0.089
mg/L
28
011
MW-08-WG-20211101
Aqueous
Lead
6010D
0.24
mg/L
28
012
SW-01-WS-20211101
Aqueous
Sulfate
300.0
2.3
mg/L
29
012
SW-01-WS-20211101
Aqueous
TDS
SM 2540C-
75
mg/L
29
012
SW-01-WS-20211101
Aqueous
Barium
6010D
0.027
mg/L
30
013
SW-02-WS-20211101
Aqueous
Sulfate
300.0
5.3
mg/L
31
013
SW-02-WS-20211101
Aqueous
TDS
SM 2540C-
110
H
mg/L
31
013
SW-02-WS-20211101
Aqueous
Barium
6010D
0.048
mg/L
32
014
SW-03-WS-20211101
Aqueous
Sulfate
300.0
9.3
mg/L
33
014
SW-03-WS-20211101
Aqueous
TDS
SM 2540C-
82
H
mg/L
33
014
SW-03-WS-20211101
Aqueous
Barium
6010D
0.026
mg/L
34
015
FD-01 -WG-2021 1101
Aqueous
Sulfate
300.0
410
mg/L
35
015
FD-01 -WG-2021 1101
Aqueous
TDS
SM 2540C-
7000
H
mg/L
35
015
FD-01 -WG-2021 1101
Aqueous
Barium
6010D
0.27
mg/L
36
015
FD-01 -WG-2021 1101
Aqueous
Lead
6010D
0.031
mg/L
36
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 4 of 58

Detection Summary (Continued)
Lot Number: WK08047
Sample Sample ID Matrix Parameter Method Result Q Units Page
(45 detections)
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 5 of 58

Inorganic non-metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-001
Description: MW-01 S-WG-2021 1101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 11/01/2021 1550
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(Sulfate) 300.0
5 11/10/2021 0043 AMR
21980
1
(TDS) SM 2540C-2011
1 11/10/2021 1920 SJL
22041
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ Units Run
Sulfate
300.0
380
5.0 mg/L 1
TDS
SM 254OC-2011
6800 H
25 mg/L 1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 6 of 58

Metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-001
Description: MW-01 S-WG-2021 1101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 11/01/2021 1550
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date Batch
1
7470A 1
11/12/2021 1051 CMS2
11/11/2021 1442 22159
1 3005A
601OD 1
11/10/2021 1701 KSH2
11/09/2021 1158 21737
Parameter
CAS Analytical
Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run
Arsenic
7440-38-2
6010D
ND
0.015
mg/L
1
Barium
7440-39-3
6010D
ND
0.025
mg/L
1
Cadmium
7440-43-9
6010D
ND
0.0050
mg/L
1
Chromium
7440-47-3
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Lead
7439-92-1
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Mercury
7439-97-6
7470A
ND
0.00020
mg/L
1
Selenium
7782-49-2
6010D
ND
0.020
mg/L
1
Silver
7440-22-4
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 7 of 58

Inorganic non-metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-002
Description: MW-01D-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 11/01/2021 1535
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(Sulfate) 300.0
1 11/10/2021 0102 AMR
21980
1
(TDS) SM 2540C-2011
1 11/10/2021 1920 SJL
22041
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ Units Run
Sulfate
300.0
16
1.0 mg/L 1
TDS
SM 254OC-2011
720 H
25 mg/L 1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 8 of 58

Metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-002
Description: MW-01D-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 11/01/2021 1535
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date Batch
1
7470A 1
11/12/2021 1053 CMS2
11/11/2021 1442 22159
1 3005A
601OD 1
11/10/2021 1712 KSH2
11/09/2021 1158 21737
Parameter
CAS Analytical
Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run
Arsenic
7440-38-2
6010D
ND
0.015
mg/L
1
Barium
7440-39-3
6010D
0.027
0.025
mg/L
1
Cadmium
7440-43-9
6010D
ND
0.0050
mg/L
1
Chromium
7440-47-3
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Lead
7439-92-1
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Mercury
7439-97-6
7470A
ND
0.00020
mg/L
1
Selenium
7782-49-2
6010D
ND
0.020
mg/L
1
Silver
7440-22-4
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 9 of 58

Inorganic non-metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-003
Description: MW-02S-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 11/01/2021 1710
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(Sulfate) 300.0
1 11/10/2021 0159 AMR
21980
1
(TDS) SM 2540C-2011
1 11/10/2021 1920 SJL
22041
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ Units Run
Sulfate
300.0
ND
1.0 mg/L 1
TDS
SM 2540C-2011
360 H
25 mg/L 1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 10 of 58

Metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-003
Description: MW-02S-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 11/01/2021 1710
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date Batch
1
7470A 1
11/12/2021 1056 CMS2
11/11/2021 1442 22159
1 3005A
601OD 1
11/10/2021 1716 KSH2
11/09/2021 1158 21737
Parameter
CAS Analytical
Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run
Arsenic
7440-38-2
6010D
ND
0.015
mg/L
1
Barium
7440-39-3
6010D
0.20
0.025
mg/L
1
Cadmium
7440-43-9
6010D
ND
0.0050
mg/L
1
Chromium
7440-47-3
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Lead
7439-92-1
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Mercury
7439-97-6
7470A
ND
0.00020
mg/L
1
Selenium
7782-49-2
6010D
ND
0.020
mg/L
1
Silver
7440-22-4
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 11 of 58

Inorganic non-metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-004
Description: MW-02D-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 11/01/2021 1715
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(Sulfate) 300.0
1 11/10/2021 0218 AMR
21980
1
(TDS) SM 2540C-2011
1 11/10/2021 1920 SJL
22041
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ Units Run
Sulfate
300.0
1.1
1.0 mg/L 1
TDS
SM 254OC-2011
320 H
25 mg/L 1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 12 of 58

Metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-004
Description: MW-02D-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 11/01/2021 1715
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date Batch
1
7470A 1
11/12/2021 1059 CMS2
11/11/2021 1442 22159
1 3005A
601OD 1
11/10/2021 1720 KSH2
11/09/2021 1158 21737
Parameter
CAS Analytical
Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run
Arsenic
7440-38-2
6010D
ND
0.015
mg/L
1
Barium
7440-39-3
6010D
0.066
0.025
mg/L
1
Cadmium
7440-43-9
6010D
ND
0.0050
mg/L
1
Chromium
7440-47-3
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Lead
7439-92-1
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Mercury
7439-97-6
7470A
ND
0.00020
mg/L
1
Selenium
7782-49-2
6010D
ND
0.020
mg/L
1
Silver
7440-22-4
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 13 of 58

Inorganic non-metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-005
Description: MW-03-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/02/2021 1320
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(Sulfate) 300.0
5 11/10/2021 0237 AMR
21980
1
(TDS) SM 2540C-2011
1 11/09/2021 2000 MSG
21861
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ Units Run
Sulfate
300.0
810
5.0 mg/L 1
TDS
SM 254OC-2011
2700
25 mg/L 1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 14 of 58

Metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-005
Description: MW-03-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/02/2021 1320
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date Batch
1
7470A 1
11/12/2021 1101 CMS2
11/11/2021 1442 22159
1 3005A
601OD 1
11/10/2021 1723 KSH2
11/09/2021 1158 21737
Parameter
CAS Analytical
Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run
Arsenic
7440-38-2
6010D
ND
0.015
mg/L
1
Barium
7440-39-3
6010D
ND
0.025
mg/L
1
Cadmium
7440-43-9
6010D
ND
0.0050
mg/L
1
Chromium
7440-47-3
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Lead
7439-92-1
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Mercury
7439-97-6
7470A
ND
0.00020
mg/L
1
Selenium
7782-49-2
6010D
ND
0.020
mg/L
1
Silver
7440-22-4
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 15 of 58

Inorganic non-metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-006
Description: MW-04-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/02/2021 1325
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(Sulfate) 300.0
1 11/10/2021 0256 AMR
21980
1
(TDS) SM 2540C-2011
1 11/09/2021 2000 MSG
21861
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ Units Run
Sulfate
300.0
25
1.0 mg/L 1
TDS
SM 254OC-2011
230
25 mg/L 1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 16 of 58

Metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-006
Description: MW-04-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/02/2021 1325
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date Batch
1
7470A 1
11/12/2021 1104 CMS2
11/11/2021 1442 22159
1 3005A
601OD 1
11/10/2021 1727 KSH2
11/09/2021 1158 21737
Parameter
CAS Analytical
Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run
Arsenic
7440-38-2
6010D
0.035
0.015
mg/L
1
Barium
7440-39-3
6010D
0.025
0.025
mg/L
1
Cadmium
7440-43-9
6010D
ND
0.0050
mg/L
1
Chromium
7440-47-3
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Lead
7439-92-1
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Mercury
7439-97-6
7470A
ND
0.00020
mg/L
1
Selenium
7782-49-2
6010D
ND
0.020
mg/L
1
Silver
7440-22-4
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 17 of 58

Inorganic non-metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-007
Description: MW-05RS-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 11/01/2021 1115
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(Sulfate) 300.0
1 11/10/2021 1918 AMR
22170
1
(TDS) SM 2540C-2011
1 11/09/2021 2000 MSG
21861
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ Units Run
Sulfate
300.0
2.8
1.0 mg/L 1
TDS
SM 254OC-2011
300 H
25 mg/L 1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 18 of 58

Metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-007
Description: MW-05RS-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 11/01/2021 1115
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date Batch
1
7470A 1
11/12/2021 1112 CMS2
11/11/2021 1442 22159
1 3005A
601OD 1
11/10/2021 1731 KSH2
11/09/2021 1158 21737
Parameter
CAS Analytical
Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run
Arsenic
7440-38-2
6010D
ND
0.015
mg/L
1
Barium
7440-39-3
6010D
ND
0.025
mg/L
1
Cadmium
7440-43-9
6010D
ND
0.0050
mg/L
1
Chromium
7440-47-3
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Lead
7439-92-1
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Mercury
7439-97-6
7470A
ND
0.00020
mg/L
1
Selenium
7782-49-2
6010D
ND
0.020
mg/L
1
Silver
7440-22-4
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 19 of 58

Inorganic non-metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-008
Description: MW-05RD-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 11/01/2021 1140
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(Sulfate) 300.0
1 11/10/2021 1937 AMR
22170
1
(TDS) SM 2540C-2011
1 11/09/2021 2000 MSG
21861
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ Units Run
Sulfate
300.0
6.0
1.0 mg/L 1
TDS
SM 254OC-2011
190 H
25 mg/L 1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 20 of 58

Metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-008
Description: MW-05RD-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 11/01/2021 1140
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date Batch
1
7470A 1
11/12/2021 1115 CMS2
11/11/2021 1442 22159
1 3005A
601OD 1
11/10/2021 1735 KSH2
11/09/2021 1158 21737
Parameter
CAS Analytical
Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run
Arsenic
7440-38-2
6010D
ND
0.015
mg/L
1
Barium
7440-39-3
6010D
ND
0.025
mg/L
1
Cadmium
7440-43-9
6010D
ND
0.0050
mg/L
1
Chromium
7440-47-3
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Lead
7439-92-1
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Mercury
7439-97-6
7470A
ND
0.00020
mg/L
1
Selenium
7782-49-2
6010D
ND
0.020
mg/L
1
Silver
7440-22-4
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 21 of 58

Inorganic non-metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-009
Description: MW-06-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/02/2021 1410
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(Sulfate) 300.0
5 11/10/2021 1956 AMR
22170
1
(TDS) SM 2540C-2011
1 11/09/2021 2000 MSG
21861
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ Units Run
Sulfate
300.0
790
5.0 mg/L 1
TDS
SM 254OC-2011
5500
25 mg/L 1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 22 of 58

Metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-009
Description: MW-06-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/02/2021 1410
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date Batch
1
7470A 1
11/12/2021 1118 CMS2
11/11/2021 1442 22159
1 3005A
601OD 1
11/10/2021 1739 KSH2
11/09/2021 1158 21737
Parameter
CAS Analytical
Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run
Arsenic
7440-38-2
6010D
ND
0.015
mg/L
1
Barium
7440-39-3
6010D
ND
0.025
mg/L
1
Cadmium
7440-43-9
6010D
ND
0.0050
mg/L
1
Chromium
7440-47-3
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Lead
7439-92-1
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Mercury
7439-97-6
7470A
ND
0.00020
mg/L
1
Selenium
7782-49-2
6010D
ND
0.020
mg/L
1
Silver
7440-22-4
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 23 of 58

Inorganic non-metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-010
Description: MW-07-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 11/01/2021 1415
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(Sulfate) 300.0
5 11/10/2021 2015 AMR
22170
1
(TDS) SM 2540C-2011
1 11/09/2021 2000 MSG
21861
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ Units Run
Sulfate
300.0
700
5.0 mg/L 1
TDS
SM 254OC-2011
10000 H
25 mg/L 1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 24 of 58

Metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-010
Description: MW-07-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 11/01/2021 1415
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date Batch
1
7470A 1
11/12/2021 1120 CMS2
11/11/2021 1442 22159
1 3005A
601OD 1
11/10/2021 1239 KSH2
11/10/2021 0143 21875
Parameter
CAS Analytical
Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run
Arsenic
7440-38-2
6010D
0.090
0.015
mg/L
1
Barium
7440-39-3
6010D
0.13
0.025
mg/L
1
Cadmium
7440-43-9
6010D
ND
0.0050
mg/L
1
Chromium
7440-47-3
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Lead
7439-92-1
6010D
0.27
0.010
mg/L
1
Mercury
7439-97-6
7470A
ND
0.00020
mg/L
1
Selenium
7782-49-2
6010D
ND
0.020
mg/L
1
Silver
7440-22-4
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 25 of 58

Inorganic non-metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-011
Description: MW-08-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 11/01/2021 1415
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(Sulfate) 300.0
5 11/10/2021 2034 AMR
22170
1
(TDS) SM 2540C-2011
1 11/09/2021 2000 MSG
21861
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ Units Run
Sulfate
300.0
610
5.0 mg/L 1
TDS
SM 254OC-2011
7300 H
25 mg/L 1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 26 of 58

Metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-011
Description: MW-08-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 11/01/2021 1415
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date Batch
1
7470A 1
11/12/2021 1123 CMS2
11/11/2021 1442 22159
1 3005A
601OD 1
11/10/2021 1307 KSH2
11/10/2021 0143 21875
Parameter
CAS Analytical
Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run
Arsenic
7440-38-2
6010D
0.070
0.015
mg/L
1
Barium
7440-39-3
6010D
0.089
0.025
mg/L
1
Cadmium
7440-43-9
6010D
ND
0.0050
mg/L
1
Chromium
7440-47-3
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Lead
7439-92-1
6010D
0.24
0.010
mg/L
1
Mercury
7439-97-6
7470A
ND
0.00020
mg/L
1
Selenium
7782-49-2
6010D
ND
0.020
mg/L
1
Silver
7440-22-4
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 27 of 58

Inorganic non-metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-012
Description: SW-01 -WS-2021 1101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/02/2021 1420
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(Sulfate) 300.0
1 11/10/2021 2053 AMR
22170
1
(TDS) SM 2540C-2011
1 11/09/2021 2000 MSG
21861
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ Units Run
Sulfate
300.0
2.3
1.0 mg/L 1
TDS
SM 254OC-2011
75
25 mg/L 1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 28 of 58

Metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-012
Description: SW-01 -WS-2021 1101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/02/2021 1420
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date Batch
1
7470A 1
11/12/2021 1126 CMS2
11/11/2021 1442 22159
1 3005A
601OD 1
11/10/2021 1311 KSH2
11/10/2021 0143 21875
Parameter
CAS Analytical
Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run
Arsenic
7440-38-2
6010D
ND
0.015
mg/L
1
Barium
7440-39-3
6010D
0.027
0.025
mg/L
1
Cadmium
7440-43-9
6010D
ND
0.0050
mg/L
1
Chromium
7440-47-3
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Lead
7439-92-1
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Mercury
7439-97-6
7470A
ND
0.00020
mg/L
1
Selenium
7782-49-2
6010D
ND
0.020
mg/L
1
Silver
7440-22-4
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 29 of 58

Inorganic non-metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-013
Description: SW-02-WS-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 11/01/2021 1640
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(Sulfate) 300.0
1 11/10/2021 2112 AMR
22170
1
(TDS) SM 2540C-2011
1 11/10/2021 1920 SJL
22041
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ Units Run
Sulfate
300.0
5.3
1.0 mg/L 1
TDS
SM 254OC-2011
110 H
25 mg/L 1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 30 of 58

Metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-013
Description: SW-02-WS-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 11/01/2021 1640
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date Batch
1
7470A 1
11/12/2021 1128 CMS2
11/11/2021 1442 22159
1 3005A
601OD 1
11/10/2021 1315 KSH2
11/10/2021 0143 21875
Parameter
CAS Analytical
Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run
Arsenic
7440-38-2
6010D
ND
0.015
mg/L
1
Barium
7440-39-3
6010D
0.048
0.025
mg/L
1
Cadmium
7440-43-9
6010D
ND
0.0050
mg/L
1
Chromium
7440-47-3
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Lead
7439-92-1
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Mercury
7439-97-6
7470A
ND
0.00020
mg/L
1
Selenium
7782-49-2
6010D
ND
0.020
mg/L
1
Silver
7440-22-4
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 31 of 58

Inorganic non-metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-014
Description: SW-03-WS-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 11/01/2021 1430
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(Sulfate) 300.0
1 11/10/2021 2209 AMR
22170
1
(TDS) SM 2540C-2011
1 11/09/2021 2000 MSG
21861
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ Units Run
Sulfate
300.0
9.3
1.0 mg/L 1
TDS
SM 254OC-2011
82 H
25 mg/L 1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 32 of 58

Metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-014
Description: SW-03-WS-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 11/01/2021 1430
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date Batch
1
7470A 1
11/12/2021 1131 CMS2
11/11/2021 1442 22159
1 3005A
601OD 1
11/10/2021 1318 KSH2
11/10/2021 0143 21875
Parameter
CAS Analytical
Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run
Arsenic
7440-38-2
6010D
ND
0.015
mg/L
1
Barium
7440-39-3
6010D
0.026
0.025
mg/L
1
Cadmium
7440-43-9
6010D
ND
0.0050
mg/L
1
Chromium
7440-47-3
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Lead
7439-92-1
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Mercury
7439-97-6
7470A
ND
0.00020
mg/L
1
Selenium
7782-49-2
6010D
ND
0.020
mg/L
1
Silver
7440-22-4
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 33 of 58

Inorganic non-metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-015
Description: FD-01-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/01/2021
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(Sulfate) 300.0
5 11/10/2021 2228 AMR
22170
1
(TDS) SM 2540C-2011
1 11/09/2021 2000 MSG
21861
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ Units Run
Sulfate
300.0
410
5.0 mg/L 1
TDS
SM 254OC-2011
7000 H
25 mg/L 1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 34 of 58

Metals
Client:ERM NC, Inc. Laboratory ID:WK08047-015
Description: FD-01-WG-20211101 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/01/2021
Date Received: 11 /04/2021
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date Batch
1
7470A 1
11/12/2021 1134 CMS2
11/11/2021 1442 22159
1 3005A
601OD 1
11/10/2021 1322 KSH2
11/10/2021 0143 21875
Parameter
CAS Analytical
Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run
Arsenic
7440-38-2
6010D
ND
0.015
mg/L
1
Barium
7440-39-3
6010D
0.27
0.025
mg/L
1
Cadmium
7440-43-9
6010D
ND
0.0050
mg/L
1
Chromium
7440-47-3
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Lead
7439-92-1
6010D
0.031
0.010
mg/L
1
Mercury
7439-97-6
7470A
ND
0.00020
mg/L
1
Selenium
7782-49-2
6010D
ND
0.020
mg/L
1
Silver
7440-22-4
6010D
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
Page 35 of 58

QC Summary
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 36 of 58

Inorganic non-metals - MB
Sample ID: WQ21861-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 21861
Analytical Method: SM 2540C-2011
Parameter Result Q Dil LOQ Units Analysis Date
TDS ND 1 25 mg/L 11/09/2021 1903
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
= RSD is out of criteria + = RPD is out of criteria
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 37 of 58

Inorganic non-metals - LCS
Sample ID: WQ21861-002 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 21861
Analytical Method: SM 2540C-2011
Spike
Amount Result %Rec
Parameter (mg/L) (mg/L) Q Dil % Rec Limit Analysis Date
TDS 1500 1500 1 101 90-110 11 /09/2021 1903
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40 %
= RSD is out of criteria + = RPD is out of criteria
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 38 of 58

Inorganic non-metals - MB
Sample ID: WQ21980-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 21980
Analytical Method: 300.0
Parameter Result Q Dil LOQ Units Analysis Date
Sulfate ND 1 1.0 mg/L 11 /09/2021 1806
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
= RSD is out of criteria + = RPD is out of criteria
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 39 of 58

Inorganic non-metals - LCS
Sample ID: WQ21980-002 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 21980
Analytical Method: 300.0
Spike
Amount Result %Rec
Parameter (mg/L) (mg/L) Q Dil % Rec Limit Analysis Date
Sulfate 20 20 1 102 90-110 11/09/2021 1844
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40 %
= RSD is out of criteria + = RPD is out of criteria
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 40 of 58

Inorganic non-metals - MS
Sample ID: WK08047-006MS Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 21980
Analytical Method: 300.0
Sample Spike
Amount Amount Result %Rec
Parameter (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) Q Dil % Rec Limit Analysis Date
Sulfate 25 10 34 1 98 90-110 11/10/2021 0315
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40 %
= RSD is out of criteria + = RPD is out of criteria
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 41 of 58

Inorganic non-metals - MSD
Sample ID: WK08047-OO6MD Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 21980
Analytical Method: 300.0
Sample Spike
Amount Amount Result %Rec % RPD
Parameter (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) Q Dil % Rec % RPD Limit Limit Analysis Date
Sulfate 25 10 35 1 100 0.55 90-110 20 11/10/2021 0334
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40 %
= RSD is out of criteria + = RPD is out of criteria
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 42 of 58

Inorganic non-metals - MB
Sample ID: WQ22041-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch:22041
Analytical Method: SM 2540C-2011
Parameter Result Q Dil LOQ Units Analysis Date
TDS ND 1 25 mg/L 11/10/2021 1920
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
= RSD is out of criteria + = RPD is out of criteria
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 43 of 58

Inorganic non-metals - LCS
Sample ID: WQ22041-002 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch:22041
Analytical Method: SM 2540C-2011
Spike
Amount Result %Rec
Parameter (mg/L) (mg/L) Q Dil % Rec Limit Analysis Date
TDS 1500 1500 1 101 90-110 11/10/2021 1920
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40 %
= RSD is out of criteria + = RPD is out of criteria
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 44 of 58

Inorganic non-metals - MB
Sample ID: WQ22170-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 22170
Analytical Method: 300.0
Parameter Result Q Dil LOQ Units Analysis Date
Sulfate ND 1 1.0 mg/L 11/10/2021 1728
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
= RSD is out of criteria + = RPD is out of criteria
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 45 of 58

Inorganic non-metals - LCS
Sample ID: WQ22170-002 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 22170
Analytical Method: 300.0
Spike
Amount Result %Rec
Parameter (mg/L) (mg/L) Q Dil % Rec Limit Analysis Date
Sulfate 20 20 1 102 90-110 11/10/2021 1900
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40 %
= RSD is out of criteria + = RPD is out of criteria
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 46 of 58

Metals - MB
Sample ID: WQ21737-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch:21737 Prep Method: 3005A
Analytical Method: 6010D Prep Date: 11/09/2021 1158
Parameter
Result
Q Dil
LOQ
Units
Analysis Date
Arsenic
ND
1
0.015
mg/L
11/10/2021 1547
Barium
ND
1
0.025
mg/L
11/10/2021 1547
Cadmium
ND
1
0.0050
mg/L
11/10/2021 1547
Chromium
ND
1
0.010
mg/L
11/11/2021 1058
Lead
ND
1
0.010
mg/L
11/10/2021 1547
Selenium
ND
1
0.020
mg/L
11/10/2021 1547
Silver
ND
1
0.010
mg/L
11/10/2021 1547
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
= RSD is out of criteria + = RPD is out of criteria
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 47 of 58

Metals - LCS
Sample ID: WQ21737-002 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 21737 Prep Method: 3OO5A
Analytical Method: 6010D Prep Date: 11/09/2021 1158
Spike
Amount
Result
%Rec
Parameter
(mg/L)
(mg/L) Q
Dil
% Rec
Limit
Analysis Date
Arsenic
0.40
0.36
1
89
80-120
11/10/2021 1551
Barium
2.0
1.9
1
95
80-120
11/10/2021 1551
Cadmium
0.40
0.38
1
95
80-120
11/10/2021 1551
Chromium
2.0
1.9
1
96
80-120
11/11/2021 1101
Lead
0.40
0.38
1
96
80-120
11/10/2021 1551
Selenium
0.40
0.38
1
94
80-120
11/10/2021 1551
Silver
0.40
0.38
1
96
80-120
11/10/2021 1551
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40 %
= RSD is out of criteria + = RPD is out of criteria
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 48 of 58

Metals - MB
Sample ID: WQ21875-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 21875 Prep Method: 3005A
Analytical Method: 6010D Prep Date: 11/10/2021 0143
Parameter
Result
Q Dil
LOQ
Units
Analysis Date
Arsenic
ND
1
0.015
mg/L
11/10/2021 1221
Barium
ND
1
0.025
mg/L
11/10/2021 1221
Cadmium
ND
1
0.0050
mg/L
11/10/2021 1221
Chromium
ND
1
0.010
mg/L
11/10/2021 1221
Lead
ND
1
0.010
mg/L
11/10/2021 1221
Selenium
ND
1
0.020
mg/L
11/10/2021 1221
Silver
ND
1
0.010
mg/L
11/10/2021 1221
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
= RSD is out of criteria + = RPD is out of criteria
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 49 of 58

Metals - LCS
Sample ID: WQ21875-002 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 21875 Prep Method: 3005A
Analytical Method: 6010D Prep Date: 11/10/2021 0143
Spike
Amount
Result
%Rec
Parameter
(mg/L)
(mg/L) Q
Dil
% Rec
Limit
Analysis Date
Arsenic
0.40
0.41
1
103
80-120
11/10/2021 1225
Barium
2.0
1.9
1
96
80-120
11/10/2021 1225
Cadmium
0.40
0.37
1
93
80-120
11/10/2021 1225
Chromium
2.0
2.0
1
100
80-120
11/10/2021 1225
Lead
0.40
0.40
1
99
80-120
11/10/2021 1225
Selenium
0.40
0.38
1
94
80-120
11/10/2021 1225
Silver
0.40
0.40
1
99
80-120
11/10/2021 1225
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40 %
= RSD is out of criteria + = RPD is out of criteria
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 50 of 58

Metals - MS
Sample ID: WK08047-01OMS
Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 21875
Prep Method: 3005A
Analytical Method: 6010D
Prep Date: 11/10/2021
0143
Sample
Spike
Amount
Amount
Result
%Rec
Parameter
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
Q Dil
% Rec
Limit
Analysis Date
Arsenic
0.090
0.40
0.56
1
118
75-125
11/10/2021 1243
Barium
0.13
2.0
2.0
1
95
75-125
11/10/2021 1243
Cadmium
ND
0.40
0.42
1
104
75-125
11/10/2021 1243
Chromium
ND
2.0
1.8
1
92
75-125
11/10/2021 1243
Lead
0.27
0.40
0.64
1
93
75-125
11/10/2021 1243
Selenium
ND
0.40
0.43
1
107
75-125
11/10/2021 1243
Silver
ND
0.40
0.40
1
99
75-125
11/10/2021 1243
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40 %
= RSD is out of criteria + = RPD is out of criteria
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 51 of 58

Metals - MSD
Sample ID: WK08047-01OMD
Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 21875
Prep
Method:
3005A
Analytical Method: 6010D
Prep Date:
11/10/2021 0143
Sample
Spike
Amount
Amount
Result
%Rec
% RPD
Parameter
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
Q Dil
% Rec % RPD
Limit
Limit
Analysis Date
Arsenic
0.090
0.40
0.56
1
117
0.45
75-125
20
11/10/2021 1248
Barium
0.13
2.0
2.0
1
92
3.0
75-125
20
11/10/2021 1248
Cadmium
ND
0.40
0.40
1
101
3.1
75-125
20
11/10/2021 1248
Chromium
ND
2.0
1.8
1
92
0.15
75-125
20
11/10/2021 1248
Lead
0.27
0.40
0.63
1
91
1.4
75-125
20
11/10/2021 1248
Selenium
ND
0.40
0.43
1
107
0.40
75-125
20
11/10/2021 1248
Silver
ND
0.40
0.39
1
99
0.58
75-125
20
11/10/2021 1248
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40 %
= RSD is out of criteria + = RPD is out of criteria
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 52 of 58

Metals - MB
Sample ID: WQ22159-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 22159 Prep Method:
Analytical Method: 7470A Prep Date: 11/11/2021 1442
Parameter Result Q Dil LOQ Units Analysis Date
Mercury ND 1 0.00020 mg/L 11/12/2021 1043
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40
= RSD is out of criteria + = RPD is out of criteria
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 53 of 58

Metals - LCS
Sample ID: WQ22159-002 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 22159 Prep Method:
Analytical Method: 7470A Prep Date: 11/11/2021 1442
Spike
Amount Result %Rec
Parameter (mg/L) (mg/L) Q Dil % Rec Limit Analysis Date
Mercury 0.0020 0.0019 1 93 80-120 11/12/2021 1045
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40 %
= RSD is out of criteria + = RPD is out of criteria
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 54 of 58

Chain of Custody
and
Miscellaneous Documents
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 55 of 58

PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC
i
f�RE
I9
i
�
I
I
r
x
�
h
7
11
�+ a
ILLI @ 3 = O
m2r n
Lb
L2
ems} {`•, a 4N!
A
i �
tx
X
X
k
J
X
1'k
i
2
�
J
i
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 56 of 58

PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC
CIQ
OWN
X
-Ayl
IL
Z=
L
w too! n -saw
a
IR
9
L
Eli
VS
ELD
�7-1 rj
C�7 N
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 57 of 58

PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC
Samples lkerelpt Cheallst (SRCI (ME0018C-1$j Revised;9129/202D
Ar tj+lreaf lss aingAuthority- PXe EW - WCOt, pagc I of 1
sample Receipt Checklist (SRC)
C L=eut. ERq Cooler Tn"crtcd byjd9ta: Jzq I f 11,1O&'2C21 Lot #: Vly ll {U47
twieanSofrtx•,eipt: ©Pace I=e��l Tip;; ve F'edEx Other;
:J Ym ; Na I, Were1`1SWd Sea] sp:C CTI:❑rttkCook{"'
'd Yes
Na
NAt
2, TFoi stud seaCa u�re I�senl, uerr th intact and unbrolugi?
pH Strip ID- zt,ssx _ Cl1Enrim Strip J D: .__ TcSfed ,. ,cH
Or[gina[temperature upon r>=pp,pt!Derived (Corrected) temperaWl'a UIFWI reeeipL V-S-olid Snay-Cup [D- NJ6
oC NA r• NA KA + NA aC NA r NA CC —
Method- LlTa j?c.rarure Bank 6L auis( 13+xtlo IR Gun ID, its Gun OoriwAi-an Factor: " "C
Method ul rwJarit: � Wet ]ce ❑ Ice flacks rw acks L1 Drou None —
Yes
No
�i A
[fr rnpeiotLLYr ❑Erin} c4oleC o�€Ceeded b.4'C, was ProjeCt [wfel, erA1o#ificd°
P.M wah N116FICri by; phone t entfl +' Flo-facc (c rcle one).
J
No
NA
4, Is the €oanrnomiul ccw Ices peeking s.in attadicd to tJiis fonu"
I Yes
No
{. 14'crc mts�r cuaitrkdy j�J'ooedtet_Es (ra.i,7yr,i;l�4xl�rccaived} follovt ad?
Yefi
7. No
d, Were sniff pie [Ds 1 iy Led on the COM
+
Xes
LD NC}
No
1. Ww sample 1Ds listed an allsamplc OOi]taiiiars?
Yes
S. 1WEi collection date & limit list d on the O0C9
0
YES
No
9. Wit; oReudpn date limo I:stcd an aC mmpie =tairiers?
LO, Lhd ali COn�aiher label information (ID, dulr:, time) agree Witt rite Coe?
! Yes
Mo
,e Yfe
Rio
11. Ware tests err he PCTR:TmPtl listed oil the COC?
No
12. Did all samples aRL,,re in the prgpor Qvntai sari fa, imch [csl anrVrW in good c611ditlon
(unLrckeu, lids bu, Clc,)'?
I Yes
j No
13, W tad: u� samp]e vnli ime, available?
es
+2 N t}
114.
WOLT all ar 49 hours, wh]Ghcver anm:s iflrst?
Ycs
No
IS. We --any eamul4s ContaineJS riiSS[rsg+excess (circle nee) NrrmplPs Not Ji3red on COC;i
ElYsr
has
�N•
16. For VOA a,id RSK-175 samples. were hlthl,ies present �1p siz6' ('r;"or Timm in diamprer;
in any of the VGA r615?
Yes
No
NA
li- Wt3,L -Al 13RO,tr auls,'nutrient sarn ]gsroceivemda[ aPAof,� T2
18. Wercall cyanide sam les zepCivod tale a 2 and ia,[rda cram Les reLA�ivrd Ld u pH
YLs
No
� NA
© Yes
❑ N+r
❑J NA
19, ",all app 'C8 Le NFI�,fT FChrcyartFde pJrecta Il625,11608.3 -Sn gr I.) SAm p; ixs free of -
re€idual efilurim?
. Were c[kiit mmarkslreyuesls (i,e, requested dilutions, LN4SIK1811 designations, etc.-,}
corract! Lrpnscribcd rim Tire 7
Y � ir,#o the carinsarlt see:irrn in I,)N]S,
21- Was 1hn {rote m°mLr�r [istntl +�t ihs container Jai?el? If . QU.0to ii AIaa
❑ Yes
❑ # `
I� IA
'J
yCS1
LJ N., 1
�Sarnple Prr_:mratian (Mkis[ bacompicted for any sarrplo(sj Mocu'rectlp pnewrverlorwv h hcsdspace.) --
S�rrnplc(s) Y WCrr received incorrxtl3y preserved ale¢ vwwo u0jimW acti�ardtnrly
ill %111Pic ]1:Cc[v[n_u ►eith ��� rnL of circle one: H2SO4. HAW, :10, Knoll using Sit f NA,
Tirhr, u-/ prcaervZion If more than ono przs�irwatjvc is neaded, p1e:i5n note lit the cainrrienib 13Cl15w.
`1'7[1'lul�1 NA were 70teiwdWith bubb.es irni Fndiami:lar,
R arriples(s) rJA WeTe recei 4Vd w [lh TRC > 0.5 m o�L (If *19 fs na) and were
11ji1sud acc4?rdjngly :n sample receiving with sodjuF:t thiosj[ tte (Na2Sa�) with Shealy Jf}; NA
R bueadc libels applied by; a�t1 jam- 111D8,�Tnx;
Commen
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 58 of 58

ERM has over 160 offices across the following
countries and territories worldwide
Argentina
The Netherlands
ERM's Charlotte, NC Office
Australia
New Zealand
ERM NC, Inc.
Belgium
Norway
300 West Summit Avenue, Suite 330
Brazil
Panama
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
Canada
Peru
Chile
Poland
T: 704-541-8345
China
Portugal
F: 704-624-7928
Colombia
Puerto Rico
France
Romania
www.erm.com
Germany
Russia
Hong Kong
Singapore
India
South Africa
Indonesia
South Korea
Ireland
Spain
Italy
Sweden
Japan
Switzerland
Kazakhstan
Taiwan
Kenya
Thailand
Malaysia
UAE
Mexico
UK
Mozambique
US
Myanmar
Vietnam
The business of sustainability ERM