2001_ROSCANS_1992

i?,vX /e o ,-._E Co
4 STATE o Z o e/
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary.
Mr. Todd Reece
County Manager
Cherokee County
County Courthouse
Cherokee, N.C. 28906
September 10, 1992
RE: Notification Of Semi-annual Sampling Dates For Landfills
Dear Mr. Reece,
William L. NicN
Direct.
This past January a letter was mailed to all landfill owner/
operators informing them that the Solid Waste Section will be
requiring semi-annual ground and surface water monitoring beginning
January 1, 1993. All landfill owner/operators were requested to
notify the Section prior to July 1, 1992, of the months they will be
performing each of their semi-annual sampling episodes for the 1993
calendar year. Please note details in the letter of January 10, 1992
that is enclosed with this letter.
As of this date the Solid Waste Section has no record of the
proposed sampling dates for next year for your facility.. Please
notify the Solid. Waste Section in writing immediately of the two
months you have chosen for sampling this coming year. A response
should be received in our office by October 15, 1992.
If you have any questions regarding this request or the water
quality monitoring program required at sanitary landfills in North
Carolina, please contact the Solid Waste Section at [phone].
s
Sincerely,
Bobby Lutfy
Hydrogeologist
Solid Waste Section
cc: Regional Supervisor-,-r11c/ A.j Foset4e
Waste Management Specialist Y 77m i�47-7jreSoau
Attachment
An Equal Opportunity Aflirmadve Action Employer

„ STATE o
yd N.r o
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687 - Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Mr. Steve Cole
U.S. Forest Service
P.O. Box 2750
Asheville, NC 28802
August 11, 1992
William L. Meyer
Director
Subject: One Time Disposal of Approximately 400 Tons of Gasoline
Contaminated Soil from the Tusquitee Work Center (Murphy,
NC) at the Cherokee County Landfill, (Permit #20-01).
Dear Mr. Cole:
The Solid Waste Management Division has received a request for
characterization of the subject waste. Based upon the submitted
information, the waste appears to be non -hazardous. The Solid Waste
Management Division has no objection to the sanitary landfill
disposal of this waste, if in accordance with the conditions listed
below:
1. The owner/operator of the landfill approves the disposal.
2. The waste contains no -free liquids.
3. The waste shall be land applied in an area of the landfill
which has received two feet of earthen cover or in a virgin
area.
4. The waste shall be applied in a thin layer not to exceed
six inches in depth.
5. Surface water shall be diverted from the area of
application.
6. The area shall be seeded to control erosion if necessary.
7. Approval for sanitary landfill disposal is explicitly
limited to a "one-time” basis. Further approval by this
office will require submittal of a new Waste Determination
form, and (if applicable), new analytical data.
Failure to meet these conditions may result in revocation of
this approval, and subsequently, an administrative penalty. If you
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Steve Cole
August 11, 1992
Page 2
have further questions or comments concerning this matter, please
contact this office at [phone].
Sincerely,
William R. Hocutt
Waste Determination Coordinator
Solid Waste Section
cc: lames Patterson
Robert Allen
Robert M. Lewis; Atlanta Environmental Mgmt.; 1920 Monroe Drive,
N.E., Suite 100; Atlanta GA 30324

•^�1 �� / M' 1 /• 4tD lil MI ' 1� `y 1_Y� ►' " 4'1YM •
f,,►'�.+1117�1..��i�� w,lll ��. _��I Y,i h Y ' ?•1 YY r
CT
•III �1 R M M.
Thf a praxd= vi.11 be uwd by the Sal J d; Wasta PWalmmt, Division to &t �i tom+
whether a wwta is (1) bazardoQs as &find by M N= 13A, and (2) suitable for
disp=al at a ad].irl waste mmvv7mrw* faaLl_ity. Tire types of waste that will ba
evaluated by this paw are drily, but rx3t % lusively, indLrtr:1x1 and
c=mrci, A3 waftm -and sludges, and Publicly Owned Tre>at=t Wnx3m Sludges.
, Th! Solid Whiste Ott bivisiarn reserves the right to request additicnal
infomatian Or waive 90me of tha requix mw ts; based cn the type of waste if it d
necessaxy. r11W Division may also mire sme wastas to he tz^ tad Cr altR. Lid to re -der
tha wastaet envirormaTt2kUy immrbile pt-ior to dispcisal at a sw-itary lardfLU. WL tes
dispos-ed at sardtaxy lardfillr. must be nm-liquid which can be .rly managed in
With the "Stolid Wdste MwiWmerrt- Rules". APMZfML TO DLSP= OF = WA=
%ULTZ AM BE OHIAi2M F" = C7W M OR OpF:VATtR OF THE LANDFILL PRiaR TO ❑rrSPOSar.-
'&A f0110wi q iffo=Zti.o n .is required fclr an evalwti ft. Irccoplete waste
detarminaticn forts wil1 ba r r*d to the generate without review. An asterikk(*)
dQrr.>tea infonnaticn regLdxoi for Publicly owned Txwb nrtt: W=ks.
A*
1. Nor a, and aoilim address of fwility or person garsmting 'waste
P.J. AAC".s r'.1,C#.vi6E' 7VO. evi r_► e_ w0,414 6eV rg ;P
2. Specific 10chtion of waste (i.e. S.R. t, murty, city, etc...)
3. Mat is 1+rIe
4. %tot: volum of disposal w111 theme be? 14 - - ✓.S
S. WAt`fx_�gtx►t=Y yo�f.,�d.i.,,s�+s.Fx].l v= t C bye; _.. r.ye'_�.}77,4f �.,.._�}_.M _ .�.. 7
6. nTlai i eitherli a Mom{ ufa .` I-�r rin: j p . i cr � 11 i3 was a was .�� ►.ed.
pw4,✓e,. �c.�s lei' ��...+�.°��"�:+ �''�'�+!K 3. I_ _.s,.�r✓
t.r 4-
B _ I (15A. N.C. Admifi. Code 13A .0006)
1. 1z the WLSta li udder .0006(d) (i.e., 40 CFR 261.30 - 261.33) ? If yes, list
*2. DOW the Write exri t arly of the foUr chazactm�c% ar, defined by 15A N.G.
Admin. Coin M .0006(c) (i.e., 40 C R 2.61.20•-261.24)? (Attach labaratmy results
for TC Ta c rity, Rnact•ivity, Xgnitabil.ity, 0=rosivity.) Na
C L&M2Zn - PEAn�j=aa
1. Does the wasU ccr t&in any hazaxxXxm Ito aarst i t*r is listed in MA N.C. Admin.
Code 13A .0006(a), AMMUX = (i.e., 40 CPR 261, Appendix v3u)3 it yes, what
ca stitLmtm ant what c xxmtratinn? (Attact lab=atoiy ree;alts) n/o
2. 't&zt: oUwer arnstibient4 are prment and in that: t rttratim?
(Attach laboratory revalts)..TZ!2�1.,k,,_.g�j - f.�,
3. W the and di-}x=1 of this unAte tote dusk cm my
cote a hatflth bazard or 2xLi..sw)ce to lardfil l persarel. /✓e
*4. Dotes the waste pass the "paint fxl.tee tit for free liquids (Mats d 9095 in
S.W. 846)? (Attach Laboratory results) _—LA`S
*5. which solid wa,sto mangy facility 1 the request for (name of land ill
and wit mmber, incinarat=, etc ... )T 6dr&s
*6. 5geoify how the vazs will be: drlivered -- bulk or ca7tairxss (i.e..
barrvan,, bags, eta.) VO4k

rtiUawiry am the =xim= land
Waste ••• • • 11'. & •A •watar andrednral
Chfttical analy&ijs in required at data&-Im limits
(1 gemrator 0 •.'s•• • to dete=airs if their waste=&.a N.C. landfil.1
:.s• c • rt. •le lemls. Analysiz for herbicides, pwticides and •1 •a w. 1RM az L: �' , l 0
MMM►/W: m!.,!x= wr L-RUZURESENCE 1. Leachable
=st always■ : datjAll ad- • if quexticm:., an •, - /. •
-xC-rG�Atnna�i}1�
NC Lndtill
�p .1'. y���p.A
IPA LU1ZN
VA /w� XC$4
MXDM
ARSENIC
=L IwaYLi
5.0
1nnal
0.05
1er�/W
0.50
BAx.TM
10000
1r00
10.00
tAwnrN
1.4
0.01
0.10
C9 uxilux
s.0
0404
0.a0
MAD
b.0
0.05
0.50
}0 amy
O. 1
0. Q 02
0.02
d�t.Y]fM
1.D
0.01.
0,10
11ILVXR
5.0
0.05
0.ISO
HnBTC20E2 i PxsnCLem
CHLDXaAKX
O.Oi
"DAIN
D.02
0.0002
0.002
KCPTACHWR
01001
-
040090
LIND "
0.40
0.004
0.04
H3."L'HOl�YOMIAN
10.00
0.10
1.00
TOXA►HIWS
0.30
0.003
0.05
2,4-0
10600
0,10
1.00
314 5- TP STW U
°
1.00
O.Q1
0.10
QIILAt{LCQ
UNZnn
O.i
01005
0/00
CARWH °l•C'l'RAClffnR3DZ
0.3
0.003
0.05
CHLORORMUNK
100.0
-
10
CH L,OROTOR31
640
-
0160
0-CRUCL
300.0
-
30
H-CP=QL
300.0
-
30
P-CPJ-WL
X00.0
-
20
1,4 OICHIA1COb2"M
7.3
0.0?'3
0.7S
162 b1cailm)%orlwat
O.S
0.003
0.05
1, 1 DICRWxoi'n"Lum
0.7
0.007
0.07
1,4 OIHITRO'"WINI
0.13
0.013
HEXJ1MAROM21"
0.13
-
0,013
11tXA 1L0A0-1#3-bVTA==
0.3
-
0.03
HRYACHLI1xL 97VA"
3.0
-
O. j0
KMYL MIYL ICt'l'Olf:
200.0
-
20
HLTT10An :xW%
3.0
-
0.30
Pb TAC HLAiR OPURM
100.0
..
10
PYRIDIH'B
5.0
+
0.30
TE.`M0iL.0R0lIi11n"Z
0.7
oval
TRICHLOROS MA"
0.3
0.005
0.03
2, 4 , 3-,nuc2 L101WPf0'J'MDL
400, 0
-
40
314, 6-0MICHWA0PW.WOL
310
+
0.20
VIM C3.M ox
0.2
09003
0.02
wlbarebyantify thAt the inftmtim mimit:ted in mart to
(rlem of w wte) is t m and Cxwrwt to the buit of my immledg ani . M
•% ' MM t
(title) c.
(data)
All qu sticrz axxV=1hV this dux 9=ld be directed to the Y
; gyp at �9�9) 733-()dg2. c cpestians in spaaa provided, Attsdi
t&.tJ.[ na1 sheets if wry
CmUzet a &U inttim, sign, and alit to:
Solid WL to Mvwj went Division; Solid Wasta Sectian
P.O. Bmc 27687; Rnloio, NO 27611
lkttn: Waste Ibtvrmi natim
LEHMP. 3151 Sias Imo. 2/15/92

NC DEPARTMENT OF Ei,,IRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATUL RESOURCES
Division of Solid haste Management
Solid Waste Section
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
Type of FaciI
Name of FaciI
Date of Last Evaluation
I. Penlit Conditions FOLLomed Yes
A. Specific Condition(s) Violated
Permit # County
No N/A
II. Operatiorel Requirements Followed Yes No
15A N.C. Admin. Code 13B Section
A. Specific Violations) by number and letter.
III. Other Violations of Rule or Law
IV. Evaluator's Comments
V. Continuation Page Required? Yes No Receiving Signature
Location
Evaluation Date Solid Waste Section
DEHNR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary: Central Office Part III Pink: Regional office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7/94)

NC DEPARTMENT OF E1,,1RONMENT, HEALTH AND NATUR-, RESOURCES
Division of Solid waste Management
Solid Waste Section
SOLID WASTE NABLAGENENT FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
Type of Facility Permit # County
Name of Facility Z j Location
Date of Last Evaluation - ')L.- G
I Permit Conditions Followed 41 Yes No N/A
A. Specific Condition(s) Violated.
II. Operational Requirements Followed Yes A No
15A N.C_ Admin. Code 138 Section P r c-, 0 L5
A. Specific VioLation(s) by nud3er and Letter.
, � n .0 5 0" ) 1 , - ,
-wt- -A kk vo, I Mh"IA,
III. Other Violations of Rule or Law
IV. Evaluator's Comments
V. Continuation Page Required? —Yes No Receiving Signature
Evaluation Date Solid Waste Section
DEHNR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary: Central Office Part III Pink: Regional Office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7/94)

vd STATE o
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
William W Cobey, Jr., Secretary
April 22, 1992
Dr_ James M. Marcus, Manager
Regulatory Services
Fluor Daniel, Inc.
100 Fluor Daniel Drive
Greenville, SC 29607-2762
RE: Disposal of Contaminated Soil
Dear Dr. Marcus:
Ann B. Orr
Regional Manager
I have received your laboratory analyses concerning the petroleum contaminated soils
(135 cubic yards) resulting from a leaking storage tank at Baker Furniture Company and have
discussed the data with Bill Hocutt, Solid Waste Section Chemist. We have concluded that
this soil is acceptable for use in areas that have received final soil cover at the Cherokee
County Landfill. The contaminated soil should be applied in no more than a six-inch layer
in these areas and the areas should then be stabilized with grass.
Please contact Robert Allen, Cherokee County Landfill Supervisor at 704/837-2621
to arrange a time for delivering this soil to the landfill.
Sincerely,
James E. Patterson
Waste Management Specialist
JEP:a
cc: Mr. Julian Foscue
Mr. Don Link
Ms. Kay Dechant
Mr. Robert Allen
Interchange Building, 59 Woodhn Place, Asheville, N.C. 28801 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

NC DEPARTMENT OF L..VIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATUx..-,L RESOURCES
Division of Solid Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY EVALUAATION REPORT
Type of Faci L i ty Permit county.
Name of Facili
Date of Last Evaluation
I. Pensit Conditions Followed Yes No N/A
A. Specific Cordition(s) Violated
Location
II. Operational Requirements Followed Yes i4 No
15A N.C. Admin. Code 138 Section " .1 t) .�
A. Specific Violations) by ember and letter.
C> e,r &- cd 5 0 r
III. Other Violations of Rule or Law Ki n
t
IV. Evaluator's Comments
V. Continuation Page Required? Yes No Receiving Signature
Evaluation Date Solid Waste Section
DEHNR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary: Central Office Part III Pink: Regional Office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7/94)

a
FLUOR DANIEL
Fluor Daniel, Inc.
100 Fluor Daniel Drive
Greenville, SC 29607-2762
[phone]
14, 1992
Mr. Jim Patterson
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
iterchange Building
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Subject: Request to Landfill Soil
Baker Furniture Company - Andrews Plant
Dear Mr. Patterson:
Per our conversation in your office on January 3, 1992, with Ms. Kay Dechant and
Mr. Don Link, I am writing on behalf of Baker Furniture Company at Mr. Jerry Carroll's
direction to request approval for disposal of petroleum -containing soil in the Cherokee
County municipal landfill. Baker Furniture has used this landfill previously for disposal of
other solid waste from routine plant operations, but this would be the first use of it for soil
disposal by our firm. Initial discussion with the county and landfill managers have indicated
acceptance on their part, contingent upon regulatory approval. The following information
is provided for your review in the approval process.
PROJECT INFORMATION
site is located t 700- M R avo I7 rl i.^ A.,. d TT rf C t 'r , a
Tiles 3_ abr,_ . Y i.a^�:.0 t �laiii` �VJ, �vG�." � arGlinFi. iL:G uJi�V� gtOuiiu
storage tanks are maintained at the northwestern portion of the site. Previously, these tanks
were located underground in the same area. An apparent release of No. 2 fuel oil was
discovered and reported to the State of North Carolina by Baker Furniture on December 6,
1990. A Fluor Daniel hydrogeologist was present at the site on December 17-18, 1990 as
soils were removed from the release area to collect samples for laboratory confirmation of
field screening results. A report summarizing these activities was submitted to the State of
North Carolina by Fluor Daniel on behalf of Baker Furniture Company on March 8, 1991
(Fluor Daniel 1991a).
In response to the March 8, 1991 report, the North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR) requested that Baker Furniture install one
groundwater monitor well, collect one groundwater sample and one soil sample for total
petroleum fuel hydrocarbons (TPFH) analysis. On May 8, 1991, a Fluor Daniel
hydrogeologist was present at the site with the drilling subcontractor to install the well and
collect soil and groundwater samples. Results of the laboratory analyses indicated that the
Baker\CEM MM

Mr. Jim Patterson
Page 2
soil contained a TPFH concentration of 60 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). A report
summarizing the findings of this work was submitted to the State of North Carolina by Fluor
Daniel on behalf of Baker Furniture Company on June 14, 1991 (Fluor Daniel 1991b).
Subsequently, NCDEHNR required a more detailed site investigation including multiple
groundwater monitor wells and delineation of the contaminated soil due to the close proximity
of groundwater to the affected soil. This work was performed by Fluor Daniel during August,
1991 as detailed in the associated report to NCDEHNR (Fluor Daniel 1991c). Essentially,
this work found the affected groundwater to include only monitor well MW-1 with a
somewhat wider area of low-level soil involvement. The five monitor wells were sampled
again on December 5, 1991. These results supported the August 1991 site investigation work
since only monitor well MW-1 exhibited evidence of petroleum contamination (Fluor Daniel
1992a).
A meeting was held with Ms. Kay Dechant and Messrs. Don Link and Jim Patterson of
NCDEHNR on January 3, 1991, to discuss these accumulated data and a remedial plan for
this site. Attending also were Mr. Jerry Carroll of Baker Furniture, Mr. Gene Wong of
Kohler Company and Messrs. John Whitehead and Mike Marcus of Fluor Daniel. The results
of this meeting were incorporated into a proposed remedial plan (Fluor Daniel 1992b) that
was subsequently approved by NCDEHNR. This plan was implemented on January 29-30,
1992.
REQUIREMENTS FOR DISPOSAL APPROVAL
Per our discussion on January 3, the following requirements must be met for disposal
approval to be granted:
No more than 50 gallons of material have been released to the affected soils;
2. The TFPH concentration of the soils for disposal not exceed 100 mg/kg;
3. Approval of the county landfill be obtained.
RESPONSE TO DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Release of material not to exceed 50 gallons.
The volume of material released resulting in the original December
1990 response was not documented; however, we have no data,
information or otherwise reason to believe that it was more than 50
gallons.
Bakei�CEMMM

Mr. Jim Patterson
Page 3
2. TFPH concentration not to exceed 100 mg/kg.
The data presented in Table 1 demonstrate that the TFPH level was
slightly over the 100 mg/kg limit (104 mg/kg). No TCLP volatile
organics were detected. Although the TFPH data just exceeded the
100 mg/kg limit, other historical data from the site indicate that the
soils typically encountered either through borings or excavation were
less than the criterion (Table 2).
3. Approval of County Landfill Authority
Disposal of this soil has been discussed with Mr. Todd Reece, Manager of
Cherokee County. Since the TCLP results for VOCs were negative, the
landfill is prepared to accept this soil once NCDEHNR has granted approval.
IMPLEMENTATION
Upon receipt of your approval to dispose of approximately 135 yd3 of soil in the Cherokee
County landfill, Baker Furniture will move immediately to do so. Documentation of disposal
(e.g., scales/tipping receipt) from the landfill will be obtained from the county landfill and
forwarded to Ms. Kay Dechant of NCDEHNR as per the request in her letter to Baker
Furniture of April 6, 1992.
SUMMARY
We appreciate your review of the material presented herein for approval to dispose of
petroleum -containing soil from the Andrews plant in the Cherokee County landfill. Such
approval will greatly assist us in continuing to manage this site with the best environmental
practices for straightforward clean-up and closure.
If I can provide any additional information or answer any questions, please call me at (704)
321-4251.
Sincerely,
I" W&UAO�w
James M. Marcus, PhD
Manager, Regulatory Services
MM:plb
cc: Kay Dechant, NCDEHNR
Jerry Carroll, Baker Furniture
Todd Reece, Cherokee County
Baker\CE212.MM

Mr. Jim Patterson
Page 4
REFERENCES
Fluor Daniel. 1991a. Site Investigation Report, Baker Furniture Company. Andrews, North
Carolina. 49 pp.
Fluor Daniel. 1991b. Supplemental Site Investigation Report, Baker Furniture Company.
Andrews, North Carolina. 21 pp.
Fluor Daniel. 1991c. Second Supplemental Site Investigation Report, Baker Furniture
Company. Andrews, North Carolina. 78 pp.
Fluor Daniel. 1992a. December 1991 Site Monitoring Report, Baker Furniture Company,
Andrews, North Carolina. 23 pp.
Fluor Daniel. 1992b. Proposed Work Plan for Site Remediation, Baker Furniture Company.
Andrews, North Carolina. 23 pp.
Baker\CEM MM

Table 2
Historical Soil Sample Results
Baker Furniture Company
Andrews, North Carolina
Sampling
Date
Type of
Samples'
Location
Number of
Samples
TPFH (mg/kg)
Mean
Range
December 1990
SS
Open Pit
4
25
15-53
May 1991
SB
Borehole
1
--
60
August 1991
SB
Borehole¢
5
<2.0
all <2.0
ILJanuary 1992
SS
Open Pits
4
47
16-130
1. SS = Soil Sample; SB = Soil Boring
2. Soil left -in -place is during original excavation (Fluor Daniel 1991a).
3. Soil left -in -place during construction of monitor well 1 (Fluor Daniel 1991b).
4. Soil left -in -place during assessment of contaminant boundary (Fluor Daniel 1991c).
5. Soil left -in -place during second excavation (Fluor Daniel 1992b).
Baker\CE212.MM

Table 1
Laboratory Results from Stockpiled Soil Analyses
January 1992
Baker Furniture Company
Andrews, North Carolina
Parameter
Concentration
• TCLP Volatiles by GC/MS
Benzene
< 10 ug/1
Carbon tetrachloride
< 10 ug/1
Chlorobenzene
< 10 ug/l
Chloroform
< 10 ug/1
1,1-dichloroethylene
<10 ug/l
Methyl ethyl ketone
< 10 ug/1
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethylene
<10 ug/l
Trichloroethylene
< 10 ug/1
Vinyl chloride
< 10 ug/1
1,2-dichloroethane
< 10 ug/l
• TFPH by Methods 3550/5030
Method 3550
74 mg/kg
Method 5030
30 mg/kg
BakeACE212.MM

NC DEPARTMENT OF L 1IRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATU_L RESOURCES
Division of Solid waste management
Solid Waste Section
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
Type of Facility Permit # Co
Name of Facility Location
Date of Last Evaluation
I- --jPermit-Conditions Followed Yes No — N/A
A. Specific Condition(s) Violated
II. Operational Requirements Followed Yes No
15A N.C. Admin. Code 138 Section
A. Specific VioLation(s) by rumber and Letter.
III. Other Violations of Rule or Law
IV. Evaluator's Comments
63
oil
V. Continuation Page Required? —Yes No Receiving Signature
Evaluation Date Solid Waste Section
DEHNR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary: Central Office
Solid Waste Section (Review 7/94)
Part III Pink: Regional Office)

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Solid. Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Mr. Layton Shuh
Emerson Electric Co. - SPD
2001 Highway 64 East
Murphy, NC 28906
William -L. Meyer
January 14, 1992 Director
Subject: Disposal of 0.5 Yd3/Day of Particle Board Drilling Chips -
Dust the Cherokee County Landfill, (Permit #20-01).
Dear Mr. Shuh:
The Solid Waste Management Division has received a request for
characterization of the subject waste. Based upon the submitted
information, the waste appears to be non -hazardous. The Solid Waste
Management Division has no objection to the sanitary landfill
disposal of this waste, if in accordance with the conditions listed
below:
1. The owner/operator of the landfill approves the disposal.
2. The waste contains no free liquids and can be confined,
compacted, and covered in accordance with the Solid Waste
Management Rules (15A NCAC 13B).
3. The waste shall be transported and disposed in a manner
which prevents a physical hazard from dust.
4. Additionally, a resubmittal of the Waste Determination Form
and current supportive analytical data, is required on the
anniversary of this approval.
Failure to meet these conditions may result in revocation of
this approval, and subsequently, an administrative penalty. The
approval is subject to change if new regulations were to prohibit
this practice. If the process which generates the waste changes or
if the composition of the waste changes significantly, this approval
is void and re-evaluation of the waste will be required prior to
subsequent disposal.
An Equal Opportunity Affim-iative Action Employer

Mr. Layton Shuh
January 14, 1992
Page 2
If you have further questions, please contact this office at
[phone].
Sincerely,
/ 4
William R. Hocutt
Waste Determination
Solid Waste Section
cc: games Patterson
Robert Allen
Coordinator

V • •,'.11 Y• ',• 1 I•
1Dix •'.11 la • all 1'•. 1 1 / ' VIDEO..6 .."
• 01 I I !ID •.MEW-GINI 12TWIN•.
� ��� M�1 ' 1 •i' DI• •' /• 1 'JI i 11 / •
M s procedure will be used by the Solid Waste Management Division to determine
whether a waste is (1) hazardous as defined by 15A NCAC 13B, and (2) suitable for
disposal at a solid waste managed facility. Zhe types of wastes that will be
evaluated by UtL- procedure are primarily,' but not exclusively, industeial and
ecuIDBrcial wastes and sludges, and Publicly Owned Treatment Works Sludges.
2-e Solid Waste Management Division reserves the right to request additional
informatkon ar waive same of the requites based on the type of waste if it deems
necessary. The Division may also require scue wastes to be treated or altered to render
the wastes environmentally immobile prior to disposal at a sanitary landfill. Wastes
disposed at sanitary landfills must be non -liquid which can be properly managed in
accordance with the "Solid Waste Management Rules". APPROVAL TO DISPOSE OF ZIiE WASTE
SHALL ALSO BE OBTAINED FROM THE OWNER OR OPERAIM OF g1JE IANDFU.L PRIOR TO DISPOSAL.
Mle following information is required for an evaluation. Incomplete waste
determination forms will be returned to the generator without review. An asterisk(*)
denotes information required for Publicly Owned Treatment Works.
A * GENERAL INF�URMATIGTT
1. Name, Tf'.II?[ DONE NUMBER and mailing address of facility or person generating waste
Emerson Electric Co. - SPD
2001 Hwy. 64 East
Murphy, NC 28906 (704) 83.7-5101
2. Specific location of waste (i.e. SR. #, county, city, etc...)
Manufacturing facility 5 miles east of Murphy on Hwy. 64 Cherokee County
3. Vaut is the waste? Particle board dril ling chips - dust
4. What volume of disposal will there be? 0. 50 cubic yard
5. What f1equency of disposal will there be? daily
6. E41ain either the manufacturing proms or haw the waste was generated.
drilling of particle board generates dust and chips
B TION FoR H1wDOUS (RCRA) DRI MJINMON (15A NCAC 13B .0006)
1. Is the waste listed under .0006(e) (i.e., 40 CFR 261.31 - 261.33)? If yes, list
Tuber. No
*2. Does the Waste exhibit any of the four characteristics as defined by .0006 (d)
(i.e., 40 CFR 261.21-261.24)? (Attach laboratory results for TC Toxicity,
Reactivity, Ignitability, Corrosivity.) No See attached Lab Analysis
C IlJE ORQMON FM LANDITIl,7 M DE` la;dR �ION
1. Does the waste contain any hazardous waste constituents listed in .0006(e),
Appendix VIII (i.e., 40 CYR 261, Appendix VIII)? If yes, what constituents and what
concentration? (Attach laboratory results) No See Attached Lab Analysis
2. What othex constituents are present and in what concentration?
(Attach laboratory results) See Attached Material Safety Data Sheets
3. Will the handling and dial of this waste create dust emissions which may
cause a health hazard or nuisance to landfill personnel. No
*4. Does the waste pass the "paint filter" test for free liquids (Method 9095 in
S.W. 846)? (Attach laboratory results) Dry Material - No Liquid Contact
*5. Which solid waste management facility is the request for (name of landfill
and Permit mmiber, incinerator, etc...)? Cherokee County Sanitary Landfill
*6. Specify how the waste will be delivered - in bulk or containoers (i.e.
barrels, bags, etc.) Loose freely mixed with common refuse - Dump truck

�al.10ding are the maxim..LL leachable (ZCCL,P) eoxttamination levels and pH for solid
waste disposal in N.C. Landfills.
Primary N.C. drinking water and Federal hazardous
limits are included for comparison.
Chemical analysis is required at detection limits
permitting assessment at or below the maximum landfill levels. individual pH values
must be >2.0 and <12.5; average values accepted are normally 4.0 - 10.0
Me generator is responsible to determine if their waste sleets N.C. landfill
acceptable levels. Analysis for herbicides, pesticides and organics MUST BE PmF mm
WHUMER IQJlMLEDGE OF 2IIC W11.SM WMS
Zii= PRISMCE A P06.SIBMPIY. Leachable metals
must always be Inquire
if any questions exist on interpretation.
NC UIU30U G NC Landfill
EPA IVMRDOIIS M out Mm M1x1"
ARS1•NIC
5.0 0.05 0.50
BARIUM
100.0 1.00 10.00
(ALML*q
1.0 0.01 0.10
CIMCKILM
5.0 0.05 0.50
[FAD
5.0 0.05 0.50
M1INURZY
0.2 0.002 0.02
S@:I17IUK
1.0 0.01 0.10
SILM
5.0 0.05 0.50
IIF7tDIC[U[S & PISI7CIT.(S
C1lLAltfVWE
0.03 - 0.003
EMIUM
0.02 0.0002 0.002
111:PFMILCR
0.008 - 0.0003
LINUME
0.40 0.004 0.04
MLIIK)XYC3MM
10.00 0.10 1.00
110=10•NE
0.50 0.005 0.05
2.4-0
10.00 0.10 1.00
2,4 5-M SMEK
1.00 0.01 0.10
S rANIL15
[YTrLFNL
0.5 0.005 0.05
CARDON TEIMCHIMME
0.5 0.005 0.05
aiLD1i0p"Mam
100.0 - 10
CHUMFU M
6.0 - 0.60
0-(3*ML
200.0 - 20
M-CM-DOL
200.0 - 20
I -C OMI L
200.0 - 20
1,4 DIClI1L1IUH NZEM
7.5 0.075 0.75
1,2 DIC71[mDI.IIIANE
0.5 0.005 0.05
1,1 DICIf1D12Dl.-n(YUM
0.7 0.007 0.07
2,4 DIN-MV1011IM?
0.13 - 0.013
IQ]Q1f.]111a1r0111•N1.0c,
0.13 - 0.013
10-KAO "D-1, 3-WDWIENE
0.5 - 0.05
IIIXk0ff. 4DVIIVdC
3.0 - 0.30
ME111YL EIIIYI. KEIONE
200.0 - 20
N1'IM"I.fM
2.0 - 0.20
l'fN1'A011I]ZOMML
100.0 - 10
PYRIDINE
5.0 - 0.50
'ITIMA 11[d201•`II IY IM
0.7 - 0.07
IRICIFLaULIIfY11'11E
0.5 0.005 0.05
,5�1RI4(L0120NIENOL
400.0 - 40
2,4,6-PRICt11LY1D1{C1MOL
2.0 - 0.20
VMM (3UAIX IDE
0.2 0.002 0.02
"I that the informations submitted in r i c l e b Q a r d drilling
"`-•'-'-'-'.I `�^-� �-u-1 I�OCfdlidd to chips & Cl U S t
_
(name of waste) is true and correct to the best of my ]umle dge and belief."
(print name) L ton Snub
(signature)
(title) E ironmenta1 Coordinator
All questions concerning this
"Procedure" should be directed to the solid Waste
Section at [phone]. Answer
specific questions in space provided. Attach
additi orla] sheets if necessary.
Completre.all information, sign, and submit to:
Solid Waste Management Division; Solid Waste Section
P.O. Boot 27687; Raleigh, NC 27611
Attn: Waste Determination
DEHMR Farm 3151 SWS REV. 11/7/90

ATE
_.
A
�� tea, U, Y,.w• .fi'
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
James—G.—Martin—Governor— -- _ William L—Meyer
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary January 14, 1992 Director
Mr. Layton Shuh
Emerson Electric Co. — SPD
2001 Highway 64 East
Murphy, NC 28906
Subject: Disposal of 0.2 Yd3/Day of Steel Shot Blasting Dust at
the Cherokee County Landfill, (Permit #20-01).
Dear Mr. Shuh:
The Solid Waste Management Division has received a request for
characterization of the subject waste. Based upon the submitted
information, the waste appears to be non -hazardous. The Solid Waste
Management Division has no objection to the sanitary landfill
disposal of this waste, if in accordance with the conditions listed
below:
1. The owner/operator of the landfill approves the disposal.
2. The waste contains no free liquids and can be confined,
compacted, and covered in accordance with the Solid Waste
Management Rules (15A NCAC 13B).
3. The waste shall be transported and disposed in a manner
which prevents a physical hazard from dust.
4. Additionally, a resubmittal of the Waste Determination Form
and current supportive analytical data, is required on the
anniversary of this approval.
Failure to meet these conditions may result in revocation of
this approval, and subsequently, an administrative penalty. The
approval is subject to change if new regulations were to prohibit
this practice. If the process which generates the waste changes or
if the composition of the waste changes significantly, this approval
is void and re-evaluation of the waste will be required prior to
subsequent disposal.
An Equal Opportunity AfBrrnative Action Employer

Mr. Layton Shuh
January 14, 1992
Page 2
If you have further questions, please contact this office at
[phone].
Sincerely,
William R. Hocutt
Waste Determination Coordinator
Solid Waste Section
cc: games Patterson
Robert Allen

S= OF •FU N• •,• 1a
• DIPARTMENr OF E ,•. a 1 I J. • �MD.
• �� I [iD • • • D •.
• •,• •11ig jj• ftnuboqj j • to /- NOEWNW019.Z11 / •
This procedure will be used by the Solid Waste management Division to determine
whether a waste is (1) hazardous as defined by 15A NCAC 13B, and (2) suitable for
disposal at a solid waste management facility. The types of wastes that will be
evaluated by ttt'L-procedure are primarily, but not exclusively, industelal and
commercial wastes and sludges, and Publicly Owned Treatment Works Sludges.
The Solid Waste Management Division reserves the right to request additicnal
-f rmation-or-waive-solve-of-the requirements based on the ty s-t if it —dew
necessary. Zhe Division may also require some wastes to be treated or altered to render
the wastes environmentally immobile prior to disposal at a sanitary landfill. Wastes
disposed at sanitary landfills must be non -liquid which can be properly managed in
accordance with the "Solid Waste Management Rules". APPROVAL TO DISPOSE OF THE WASTE
SHALL ALSO BE ORDAINED FROM THE 0WNER OR 0PERATOR OF THE IMDFILL PRIOR TO DISPOSAL.
The following information is required for an evaluation. Inocuplete waste
determination forms will be returned to the generator without review. An asterisk(*)
denotes information requited for Publicly Owned Treatment Works.
A * CENERAL INFbId TION
1. Name, TEI MIONE NOMBER and mailing address of facility or person generating waste
Fmersnn F1 Pnt-ri c Co - SPn
2001 Hwy. 64 East
Murphy, NC 28906 [phone]
2. Specific location of waste (i.e. SR. #, County, city, etc...)
Manufacturing facility 5 miles east of Murphy on Hwy 64, Cherokee County
3. What is the waste? S h of b l a s t i ng dust
4. What volume of disposal will there be? 0. 2 0 C u b i c Y a r d s
5. What frequency of disposal will there be? daily
6. Explain either the manufacturing press or how the waste was generated. steel
shotblasting dust from bagfilter separator
B D*-O TON FOR H1 ?MDOus (RCRA) DETf 1TI0N (]5A NCAC 13B .0006)
1. Is the waste listed under .0006(e) (i.e., 40 CFR 261.31 - 261.33)? If yes, list
iu k)er. No
*2. Does the Waste exhibit any of the four d1aracteri St-i cs as defined by .0006(d)
(i.e., 40 CFR 261.21-261.24)? (Attach laboratory results for TC Toxicity,
Reactivity, Ignitability, Corrosivity.) No See attached Lab Analysis
C D*XX�ON FUR 1ANDF 11,11TG DRIERKrN 1TION
1. Does the waste contain any hazardous waste constituents listed in .0006(e),
Peen ix VIII (i.e., 40 C132 261, Appendix VIII)? If yes, what constituents and what
Concentration? (Attach laboratory results) No See attached Lab Analysis
2. What other constituents are present and in what concentration?
(Attach laboratory results) See attached Material Safety Data Sheets
3. Will the handling and disposal of this waste create dust emissions which may
cause a health hazard or nuisance to landfill personnel. No
*4. Does the waste pass the "paint filter" test for free liquids (Method 9095 in
S.W. 846)? (Attach laboratory results) _Dry Material - No liquid contact
*5• Which solid waste manag nt facility is the request for (name of landfill
and permit number, incinerator, etc...)? Cherokee County Sanitary Landfill
*6. Specify how the waste will be delivered - in bulk or containers (i.e.
barrels, bags, etc.) Loose -freely mixed with common refuse - dump truck

Following are the maximum leachable (TCLP) contamination levels and pH for solid
waste di x.sal in N.C. Iandfills. Primary•N.C. drinking water and Federal hazardous
limits are inclined for cm parison. C ianical analysis is required at detection limits
permitting assessment at or below the maximum landfill levels. Individual pH values
must be >2.0 and <12.5; average values accepted are normally 4.0 - 10.0
'Ihe generator is responsible to determine if their waste meets N.C. landfill
acceptable levels. Analysis for herbicides, pesticides and organics MUST HE
F UIC- VER RKNIEQGE OF THE MAKES THMIR P02 SL (M A P:ISSIB=I Y. leachable metals
mist always be 1ni ned. Inquire if any questions exist on interpretation.
NC DHI11 UM
NC landfill
A
EPA NUMMOM
w►IFn HM
M MMlhi
_
Al2SFNIC
IJ;y5rm3iL1
5.. 0
UPA
0.05
rnU&j
0.50
R RIUM
100.0
1.00
10.00
CADMIIM
1.0
0.01
0.10
0MOKQll
5.0
0.05
0.50
1FAD
5.0
0.05
0.50
MF7taw
0.2
0.002
0.02
!Uff I'M
1.0
0.01
0.1.0
SILVFII
5.0
0.05
0.50
IiF7tDICIU S 6 i'[STICIi71S
c1molaym
0.03
-
0.003
FMUH
0.02
0.0002
0.002
! 0' P AC11=
O. ooa
-
0.0008
LINDW
0.40
0.004
0.04
MIi 11 myclum
10.00
0.10
1.00
40X/ UME
0.50
0.005
0.05
2,4-4)
10.00
0.10
1.00
2.4 5-M SIUMC
1.00
0.01
0.10
9V_jVM
BMIENE
0.5
0.005
0.05
CAIUICN TEMWIUl1t11E
0.5
0.005
0.05
aff-a m-NLFNE
100.0
-
10
ciffDlDFUM
6.0
-
0.60
0-00-SUL
200.0
-
20
M-M-SOL
200.0
-
20
I-QtUM
200.0
-
20
1,4 DIC11IlYlDiYMEM
7.5
0.075
0.75
1, 2 DIailllnOMMi;
0.5
0.005
0.05
1,1 DICIU1JiiDEnIYL'PNE
0.7
0.007
0.07
2,4 MM1010MML
0.13
-
0.011
100Q1C1II17dODfNIFNE
0.13
-
0.013
HElU10M; D-1, 2-WrAD 4E
0.5
-
0.05
10.2C/Y]O:L1110F'111mc
3.0
-
0.30
ME111YL E311YL KELUM
200.0
-
20
NITHOOF Mm,
2.0
-
0.20
PFNfAC UaiDMEML
100.0
-
10
11YIUDIM7.
5.0
-
0.50
•n-11W3iICM?nIY1jM
0.7
-
0.07
IMIC111"4 .111YLLM
0.5
0.005
0.05
1RIC]1IOIIDMIENDL
400.0
-
40
, 4 , 6-101YUCNLMM CWL
2.0
-
0.20
vim• C]Uf.RIDE
0.2
0.002
0.02
"I lierebY certify that the information submitted in regard to s h o t b l a s t dust
(name of waste) is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief."
(print name) La- ton Schuh
(signature)
(title) En or
(date)_ (c) (z-, �&?j
All questions concerning this "Procedure" should be directed to the Solid Waste
section at [phone]. Answer specific questions in space provided. Attach
additions] sheets if necessary.
Ocm>plete all information, sign, and submit to:
Solid Waste Manages Division; Solid Waste Section
P.O. Boat 27687; Raleigh, NC 27611
Attn: Waste Determination
EEHNR Form 3151 SW5 REV. 11/7/90

_M1
LEE COMPANY
P.O. BOX 2940
SHAWNEE MISSION, KS 66201
913-384-4000
May 26, 1992
Jim Patterson
N.C. flonartmont of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
Solid Waste Section
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Ref: Solid Waste Disposal
Lee Apparel Company, Inc.
Highway 19/129
Andrews, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Patterson:
This letter will confirm our telephone conversation on 5-21 92 regarding the
disposal of wastewater pretreatment sludge from the Lee facility in Andrews,
North Carolina. We have been utilizing on -site storage and disposal of our
sludge waste.
During our discussion, you informed me that on -site storage and disposal is
not acceptable unless prior approval is granted from your Department. You
stated that our waste is classified as non -hazardous and may be disposed in
the future at the city landfill if proper moisture levels are achieved, and
the city landfill agrees to accept the waste. You also stated that the
existing waste disposed of on -site does not need to be removed.
Based upon this information, we will no longer store or dispose of this waste
on our property. Attached is the information concerning our facility in
Winston-Salem which generates similar waste. We are pursuing methods to dry
the sludge before disposal at the city landfill.
Should you have any questions or concerns on our disposing of this waste,
please contact me at 913-384-4000.
Sincerely,
Brad D. Webb, P.E.
Senior Facilities Engineer
80W:t1f/8W601
cc: K.W. Garrard
Russellville
J.A. Gibson
Andrews
D. Raxter
Andrews
R.D. Norris
Merriam
J.M. Fischer
Merriam
B.KAA991,
Merriam

February 13, 1992
Bill Hocutt
_Soli-d-Waste Management Division
401 Oberlin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
Ref: Waste Determination - Lee Apparel Company, Inc.
(New Facility) Centre Park Boulevard
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Dear Mr. Hocutt:
Please find attached the Waste Determination Questionnaire for
the Lee Company facility to be located at Centre Park Boulevard
in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. As noted in the questionnaire,
I am requesting approval to dispose of the waste at the Winston-
Salem City Landfill.
The facility is currently under construction and scheduled for
production start-up on June 1, 1992. Therefore, I'm asking you
to expedite this request as soon as possible, should questions or
concerns arise.
I have attached sample test results from our Springfield,
Missouri, and Dalton, Georgia facilities which generate similar
waste. These sample tests include results for pH, paint filter,
and TCLP analysis, as you've requested.
Should you have any questions, or require additional information,
please contact me at 913-384-4000, Ext. 693. I look forward to
your response on our waste disposal procedure at your earliest
convenience.
Sincerely,
Brad D. Webb, P.E.
Senior Facilities Engineer
cc: Roger Norris
Mike Fischer
Randy Stabenow
Randy Fortenberry
BDw:t1f/BM572

=ATM iDII' OF FNVII�tZ* ILrir,' i mAun i AND TIlauw, RLrC up=
SOLID WNM E MJUNSD- lNr DIVISIC14; SOLID WA.SZr, SEJON
Th-i
s ProDedure Will be used by the Solid Waste Management Division to dnterr -
whether a waste is (1) hazardous as defined by 10 NCAC 10F, and (2) suitable for
disposal at a solid waste management facility. The types of wastes that will be
evaluated by this procedure are primarily, but not exclusively, industrial and
commercial wastes and sludges, and Publicly Owned Treat>nent Works Sludges.
The Solid Waste Management Division reserves the right to rat additional
information or waive some of the requirements based on the type of waste if it deems
mne ssary. The Division may also require some wastes to be treated or altered to render
the-wastes-envi-rre ment iiy-mile prior to disposal at a sanitary landfill. Wastes
disposed at sanitary landfills must be moor -liquid which can be prq:)esly managed in
accordance with the "Solid Waste Management Rules". APPRDVAL TO DISPOSE OF THE WASTE
S MIL ALSO BE 0I3MMM FROM THE OWER OR OPERATOR OF THE IMDFIZ.L PRIOR TO DISPOSAL.
The followir9 information is required for an evaluation. Incomplete waste
determination forms will be returned to the gene-rator without review. An asterisk(*)
denotes information required for Publicly Owned Treatment Works.
A * GINERAL INFURNUTION
1. Name, TEI�MJMBER and mailing address of facility or person gene ati-ng waste
Lee Apparel Company, Inc.
Centre Park Boulevard
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
2. Specific location of waste (i.e. SR. #, county, city, etc...) (See above)
3. What is the waste? Dried sludge from the Wet -Processing of Denim Blue Jeans
4. What Wli of disposal will there be? 27 tons per Week (Estimated)
5. What frequency of disposal will there be? Weekly
6. Explain either the manufacturing process or how the waste was generated.
Wastewater effluent from the wet -processing of denim garments is screened with
vibrating filters. solids are accumulated in a Settling Tank and transferred to a Drying Bed before
B DUU:;1QTI0N FoR HAZARDOUS (RCRA) Dg TION (10 i3C11C lOF .0029) disposal.
1. Is the waste listed under '.0029(e) (i.e., 40 CFR 261.31 — 261.33)? If yes, list
number. No
*2. Doe's the waste exhibit any of. the four characteristics as defined by .0029 (d)
(i.e., 40 CFR 261.21-261.24) ? (Attach laboratory results for FP Tbocicity,
Reactivity, Ign-itability, Corrosivity.) No, See attached Test Analvsis Results
C I UUUT OG d FM UJMF`III,TN9 Cff
1. Does the waste Main any hazardous waste ccrn-tituernts listed in . 0029 (e) ,
APPendix VIII (i.e., 40 CFR 261, Appendix VIII)? If yes, what constituents and what
COnceiltratlon? (Attach laboratory results) Trace amounts of Cadmium, Chromium,
and Barium as indicated on attached laboratory test results.
2. What other constituents are present and in what aan�rrtxation?
(Attach laboratory results) Pumice Stone 70% (Estimated)
Moisture 30°b (Estimated)
3. Will the handling and dual of this waste create dust enissions which may
cause a health hazard or nuisance to landfill personnel. No
*4. Does the waste pass the "paint filter" test for free liquids (Method 9095 in
S.W. 846)? (Attach laboratory results) Yes
*5. Fi-,ch solid waste management facility is the rat for (name of landfill
and permit number, incinerator, etc ... ) ? Hanes Mill Road - Sanitary Landfill - Permit
Mumher +4 2 Winston-Salem, North Carolina
*6. Specify how the waste will be delivered — in bulk or containers (i.e.
barrels, bags, etc.) Bulk via Di . Truck

.4
Following are the maximum leachable (Iup) cantaanination levels and piI for solid r
waste disposal in N.C. Landfills. Primary N.C. drinking water and Federal hazaxdocly limits are inclu3ed for omparison. Cxmical analysis is r q� at detection limits
permitting assesmnent at or below the max== landfill levels. Individual pH values
mist be >2. 0 and <12.5; avleracr values accepted are normally 4.0 - 10.0
M-le 901--Mtor is bible to determine if their waste macsts N.C. landfill
as le levels. Analysis for herbicides, pesticides and organics MbT BE I
KPIOWLEDM OF ZIIE i+PmE MA EES 931Ellt PitFSEWM A PASSIBILITY. Leachable metals
must always be det�ne . jmVjre if W, Qaastions exist on interpretation.
W UFUMQNO
I+c UVXULU
EM IU\ MMOIS
NA'Itlt MM
MAX] Ri
MCEN1C
wu m
100.0
1.00
10.00
CALIMIUM
1.0
0.01
0.10
O tI CKILM
5.0
0. 05
0. 50
LEAD
5.0
0.05
0.50
I11.1i=?Y
0.2
0.002
0.02
SFIFNIUR
1.0
0.01
0.10
SILVER
5.0
0.05
0.50
1F7t171t U L j-rr==
(3ILI due
0.03
-
0.003
FMRIN - -
_, 0.02 _
0.0002
0.002
11L•'r IX)rLon
0.006
-
0.0008
LUAYM
0.40
0.004
0.04
I0-M UCYCI M R
10. 00
0.10
1.00
7t> M10•NE
0.50
0.005
0.05
2,4-D
10. DO
0.10
1.00
2,4 5-W SnMDC
1.00
0.01
0.10
-QUA ISM
tlwz. NM
0.5
0.005
0.05
CNIDON 'LEIRACIIIIRIM
0.5
0.005
0.05
OIIL1UUUMNE
100.0
-
10
CuLa 0FUM
6.0
-
0.60
0-QiE90L
200.0
-
20
M-<3:lML
200.0
-
20
I"CREML
200.0
-
20
1,4 DIQMaUff- 7aM
7.5
0.075
0.75
1,2 DIO1L0 CCnME
0.5
0.005
0.05
1,1 m a I rL1ioen m1•NE
0.7
0. D07
0.07
2,4 DINl-MMILINE
0.13
-
O.OI3
IIi;>♦1C111LltURXLENE
0.13
-
0.013
10°XACIn-aUi-1,3-DIII' MIM
0.5
-
0.05
I WRAC 1 a.L11Ur.11 VM
3. 0
-
0.30
MIMIYL VIM% 1a UW..
200.0
-
20
Hr1VCOI rzFNE
2.0
-
0.20
I'A ITNC111OfY) IRML
100.0
-
10
INUMINE
5.0
-
0.50
,m-n tM11I0a' cenra"m
0.7
-
0.07
7RIOIIan nrYi1•Ne
0.5
0.005
0.05
2,4,5--g1U(11IL11U111QIGL
400.0
-
40
2,4,6-rMC1U-a CS H0L
2.0
-
0.20
VINYL C3 U-nu 7R
0.2
0.002
0.02
" 1 I hereby
n Cer t l_fy that the information m2 mitfied 1n �rd to Dried Sludge
(name of waste) is trine and correct to the best of my )a•mledcp and belief . t1
(Print name) Brad D. Webb
(signature) l f
(title) Senior Facilities Engineer
(date)__ February 13, 1992
All questions curc� this "Prooedae- sli ul.d be directed, to the Solid Waste
Section at [phone]. Answer sPeci.fic questions in space Provided. Attach
additional sheets if necessary.
Oowlete all information, sign, and szt n.it to:
Solid Waste Man ent: Division; solid Waste Section
P.O. Boat 27687; Raleigh, NC 27611
Attn: Waste Detemli 1-►�tian
�IFt Form 3151 SF15 12FV. 10/18/90

TSLINC.
Technical Services Laboratories, Inc.
1612 North Lexington Avenue • Springfield. Missouri 65002
417-864-8924 FAX:[phone] BN: B-864.3175
UPON FUTURE CORRESPONDENCE
REFER TO REPORT NUMBER
Material WASTE MATERIAL
Test Report No D-7784
Manufacturer Lee Apparel Company, Inc. - Address SPRINGFIELD, MO
Purchase Order No. File No. T-082 Specification
Date Sample Submitted OCTOBER 17, 1991 Date Sample Received OCTOBER 17, 1991
Analysis of a waste sample, as identified below, received from Mr. John Phinney, Lee Apparel.
Sample Identification ............................ Drying Sludge Pit
10-17-91
Appearance .................................... Moist grey powder
Paint Filter Test ................................. No free liquids
TCLP Analysis:
Metals:
Chromium, ppm* ..........................
0.02
Lead, ppm.................................
Not detected,
<0.01
Cadmium, ppm ............................
0.03
Arsenic, ppm ..............................
Not detected,
<0.01
Barium, ppm ...............................
Not detected,
<0.10
Silver, ppm................................
Not detected,
<0.01
Mercury, ppm ..............................
Not detected,
<0.002
Selenium, ppm .............................
Not detected,
<0.01
*Parts per million
cc: Mr. John Phinney
Lee Apparel
2950 W. Catalpa
Springfield, MO 65802
Prepared by: R. E. Hackley / R. C. Thaemlitz / M. D'Onofrio / Dr. J. Bohanon
Approved by: /� t, Date: November 6, 1991
LABORATORY DIRECTOR

TSL
Test Report D-7784
November6, 1991
Page 2
TCLP Analysis:
Organics:
Benzene, ppm ..............................
Not detected,
<0.01
Carbon tetrachloride, ppm ..................
Not detected,
<0.01
Chlorobenzene, ppm .......................
Not detected,
<0.01
Chloroform, ppm ...........................
Not detected,
<0.01
o-Cresol, ppm ....... ...................
Not detected,
<0.01
p-Cresol, and m-Cresol, ppm ................
Not detected,.
<0.01
1,4 Dichlorobenzene, ppm ..................
Not detected,
<0.01
1,2 Dichloroethane, ppm ....................
Not detected,
<0.01
1,1-Dichloroethylene, ppm ..................
Not detected,
<0.01
2,4-Dinitrotoluene, ppm ....................
Not detected,
<0.01
Hexachlorobutadiene, ppm .................
Not detected,
<0.01
Hexachlorobenzene, ppm ...................
Not detected,
<0.01
Hexachloroethane, ppm ....................
Not detected,
<0.01
Methyl ethyl ketone, ppm ...................
Not detected,
<0.01
Nitrobenzene, ppm ........................
Not detected,
<0.01
Pentachlorophenol, ppm ...................
Not detected,
<0.01
Pyridine, ppm ..............................
Not detected,
<0.01
Tetrachloroethylene, ppm ..................
Not detected,
<0.01
Trichloroethylene, ppm .....................
Not detected,
<0.01
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol, ppm .................
Not detected,
<0.01
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol, ppm .................
Not detected,
<0.01
Vinyl chloride, ppm .........................
Not detected,
<0.01

KANSAS CITY TESTING LABORATORY
KCPL # 65/0, n 05F
Lee Company
Client Purchase Order 0 : 22205
One sludge sample received /05/SO
DETECTIGN
PARAMETER METHOD LIMIT - RESULTS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
CHROMIUM
1111
0.01 mg/L.
0.01 mo/L
BARIUM
1111
0.1 Mg/L
0.1mo/L
LEAD
311C11
0.001 mg/L
hone detected
CADMIUM
W11
0,006 rya/L
none detected
ARSENIC
=13
0.00Z mg/L
none detected
SELENIUM
311Z
0.001 mg/L
none detected
SILVER
ziii
0.01 mg/L
none detected
PH
1310
---_ -
6.77.
solids
Q10
-----
46. % w/w
water
KF
O. M2 %
45.?% w/w
Metals data
obtained
with EPTOX method 1310,
SW-346
SI..V�Cx-, l.J1l.l..' �L \a {� �"'�1l)�.r. ..�y0`..li��•
�1-4
CD(3� �i ritp F2ot-� ��Li Owl � (7i�D�C-�► ►4 � .. .

STATE o
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687 - Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
James G. Martin, Governor William L. Meyer
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
February 18, 1992
Mr. Brad D. Webb, P.E.
Lee Apparel Company, Inc.
3201 Centre Park Boulevard
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Subject: Disposal of Approximately 27 Tons/Week of Dried Denim
Garment Processing Sludge at the City of Winston-Salem
Landfill, (Permit #34-02).
Dear Mr. Webb:
The Solid Waste Management Division has received a request for
characterization of the subject waste. Based upon the submitted
information, the waste appears to be non -hazardous. The Solid Waste
Management Division has no objection to the sanitary.landfill
disposal of this waste, if.in accordance with the conditions listed
below:
1. The owner/operator of the landfill approves the disposal.
2. The waste contains no free liquids and can be confined,
compacted, and covered in accordance with the Solid Waste
Management Rules (15A NCAC 13B).
3. Total or TCLP leachable potassium permanganate
concentration residual in this waste is to be determined at
a detection level <1.0 ppm once this new plant is
operational (after June 1, 1992). This data should be
forwarded to the Solid Waste Section as soon as available.
4. Additionally, a resubmittal of the Waste Determination Form
and current supportive analytical data, is required on the
anniversary of this approval.
Failure to meet these conditions may result in revocation of
this approval, and subsequently, an administrative penalty. The
approval is subject to change if new regulations were to prohibit
this practice. If the process which generates the waste changes or
if the composition of the waste changes significantly, this approval
is void and re-evaluation of the waste will be required prior to
subsequent disposal.
r_.._+n-..__.._...1.._ -

Mr. Brad D. Webb, P.E.
February 18, 1992
Page 2
If you have further questions, please contact this office at
[phone].
Sincerely,
William R. Hocutt
Waste Determination Coordinator
Solid Waste Section
cc: Jan McHargue
D Miles
rad D. Webb, P.E.; Lee Company; P.O. Box 2940; Shawnee Mission,
KS 66201

Y • •'•I •► ,• 1 I
�• /1 / I !ID 10 1 • •• /1 / � •
This procedare will be used by the Solid Waste Management Division to determine
whether a waste is (1) hazardous as defined by 10 N= 10F, and (2) suitable for
disposal at a solid waste management facility. The types of wastrel that will be
evaluated by this pry are primarily, but not elusively, irr3ustri.al and
arrmemial wastes and sludges, and Publicly Owned Treatment Works Sludges.
The Solid Waste Management, Division reserves the right to request additia-k
information waive some of therequirements
based on the tYPeste
-if it: deems
treated or a
the wastes envi Dm,R„e�,1-�i y also reqiire some wawastes to be altered to render
y inmobile prior to disposal at a sanitary landfill. Wastes
disposed at sanitary landfills s mast be nan-liquid which can be properly MMged in
accordance with the "Solid Waste Markmant files". AMOVAL M DISPOSE OF ZHE WAgm
SIT ATSO DE OMMINED FROM niE. MnM CR OPMAaM OF 11M LVMFII.1, PRIOR TO DISPOSAL.
The following information is reTuxed for an evaluation. Incomplete waste
determination forms will be returned to the 9ery--rator without review. An asterisk(*)
-.denotes-information-required for Publicly -Owned Treatmmt Works.
A * amHPAL DUUMMON
1' Nam2' 10W_1 MJMBZ and mailing address of facility or person 911
Lee Apparel Company, Inc. waste
3Z6 Centre Park Boulevard
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
2. Specific location of waste (i.e. SR._#, oeUrhty, city, etc...) (See above)
3. Rmt is the Waste? Dried sludge from the Wet -Processing of Denim Blue Jeans
4. What volume of d7-sposal will there be? 27 tons per Week (Estimated)
5 • Mlat frequency of disposal will there be? we ek lv
6 • Explain either the Inarnifacturing process or how the waste was generated.
Wastewater effluent from the wet -processing of denim garments is screened with
vibrating filters solids are accumulated in a Settling Tank and transferred to a i Bed before
B TION >;UZ RZARDCUS I is-2 ) Ut:11a341MTIO1T (10 NO C 10F .0029) sposa:
1. Is the waste listed under'.0029(e) (i.e., 40 C R 261.31 - 261.33)? If yes, list
rMber. No
*2. Does the waste exhibit any of the fair characteristics as defined
(i.e., 40 CFR 261.21-261.24)? (Attach laboratory results for i?P Ttinci x.0029(d)
city,
ReactiVity, Ignitab'-"ty, CbrLb6iVitY.) No. See attached Test Analysis Results
C INFaMITOg FM 7MDF 113NG EL'Efd6MTICt1
1. Dees the waste contain any hazardous waste vorlstituents listed in .0029(e),
APPerKUX VIII (i.e., 40 C-R 261, Appendix VIII)? If yes, what ccnStituents and what
cQrxDentrat cn? (Attach laboratory results) Trace amountsoof Cadmium, Chromium,
and Barium as indicated on attached laboratory test results.
2. Valat athvr constituents are present and in what
(Attach laboratoryao�ntratioll.
results) Pumice Stone 70% (Estimated)
Moisture 30'/. (Estimated)
3. Will the handling and disposal of this Waste create dust emissions which may
cause a health hazard or nuisance to landfill
�.
*4. Does the waste No
pass the No filter" test for free liquids (Method 9095 in
S.W. 846) (Attach laboratory results) Yes
*5. Mdch solid waste management facility is the request for name of landfill
and permit mmiDer, incinerator, etc... ?
) Hanes Mill Road -Sanitary Landfill - Permit
NtnnhPr 'i4-01 Winston-Sal�wn- Nnrrh Cnr.,1;..�
*6•
Specify how the waste will be delivered - in bulk or co�ntalrxhrs (l. e.
barrels, b&p, etc.) Bulk via M Truck

Following are the maxi mTm leachable (TCIP) contamination levels and pti for solid
waste disposal in N.C. Landfills. Primary N.C. drinking water and Ftderal ha,-.ardou--
limits are inr✓.luded for ci parison. Chemical analysis is required at detection limits
Permitting assessment at or below the maxi ]n Tm landfill levels. Individual PH values
must be >2.0 and <12.5 ; average values accepted are normally y 4.0 - 10.0
The generator is responsible to determine if their waste meets N.C. landfill
astable levels. Analysis for herbicides, pesticides and organics MUST BE IUUU E
MUM7 R iWWI= OF ME WAM MAKES TfiE;Il2 PF=NCE A POSSIBIII'I'Y. Leachable metals
mast always be determined. Inquire if any questions exist on interpretation.
r>c DraN IN5
W Lzrxuil.l
EM 1017dvMOUS
WATM MM
F9 Wm
IUMU
IFIVEL-iMZL1
_IL4m1_
(nTL1L_
M>T141C
5.0
0.05
0.50
DAR1tH
100.0
1.00
10.00
CA[74tt"
1.0
0.01
0.10
a R4?1IUM
5.0
0.05
0.50
MAD
5.0
0.05
0.50
►OCURY
0.2
0.002
0.02
SF7_FNIUi
1.0
0.01
0.10
SILVER
5.0
0.05
0.50
III?UXIVC5 ri PfSPICST.FS
aILEIdYWE
- 0.03
-
0.003
EMRIN
0.02
0.D002
0.002
M717K]MM
0.008
-
0.000E
LINDAW
0.40
0.004
0.04
1 .Ill YaQfR
10.00
0.10
1.00
7o11ff?4E
0.50
0.005
0.05
2,4-D
10.00
0.10
1.00
2,4 5-JIP S=X
1.00
0.01
0.10
9U► NU
1><NI.F14F.
0.5
0.005
0.05
C PDN TuiTzMlars4ME
0.5
0.D05
0.05
OUjaU ANTE
100.0
-
10
UMOU T3M
6.0
-
0.60
0-aawL
200.0
-
20
)YAM
200.0
-
20
P-CI ML
200.0
-
20
1, 4 010II11(>Oty7
7.5
0.075
0.75
1,2 Dlou-accliv'NE
0.5
0.005
0.05
1,1 DIa1f.Rccnryij-NE
0.7
0.007
0.07
2,4 DR41'MIDIM-NE
0.1.7
-
0.01.3
10�ClQfii7[YMINE
0.13
-
0.013
10JC1t0ILtIiT 1,J-QJ17�T7E
0.5
-
0.05
1 tF7C1Y] tILI70F�] V1NE
3.0
-
0.30
KMIYL MIrYL KErCHE
200.0
-
20
►i1TAD0MUM
2.0
-
0.20
PiNIN]IIL7i1I HNM
100.0
-
10
1'YItIMM
5.0
-
0.550
9£IlMalic"Cr'IIMNE
0.7
-
0.07
nucl ILiiounrYLF?4E
0.5
0.005
0.05
2,4,5-IMafJCMIIOIM
400.0
-
40
2 , 4 , 6-2RI0 a.U"CfiDL
2.0
-
0.20
vINn aarpT E
0.2
0.002
0.02
"I hereby cer-tifv that the information submitted in regard to Dried Sludge
(name of waste) is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. --
(print mane) Brad D. Webb
(signature)
(title) Senior Facilities Engineer
(date) February " . 1992
All questions acnoezning this "Procedure" should be directed -to the Solid Waste
Section at [phone]. Answer specific questions in space provided. Attach
additional. streets if necessary.
Complete all information, sign, and submit to:
Solid Waste Division; Solid Waste Section
P.O. Box 27687; Raleigh, NC 27611
Attn: Waste Determination
MItIR Fb m 3191 SWS =. le/18/90

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
William WCobey, Jr. Secretary
April 22, 1992
Dr. James M. Marcus, Manager
Regulatory Services
Fluor Daniel, Inc.
100 Fluor Daniel Drive
Greenville, SC 29607-2762
RE: Disposal of Contaminated Soil
Dear Dr. Marcus:
APR 2 7 1992
Ann B. Orr
Regional Manager
I have received your laboratory analyses concerning the petroleum contaminated soils
(135 cubic yards) resulting from a leaking storage tank at Baker Furniture Company and have
discussed the data with Bill Hocutt, Solid Waste Section Chemist. We have concluded that
this soil is acceptable for use in areas that have received final soil cover at the Cherokee
County Landfill. The contaminated soil should be applied in no more than a six-inch layer
in these areas and the areas should then be stabilized with grass.
Please contact Robert Allen, Cherokee County Landfill Supervisor at 704/837-2621
to arrange a time for delivering this soil to the landfill.
Sincerely,
James E. Patterson
Waste Management Specialist
JEP:a
cc: Mr. Julian Foscue
Mr. Don Link
Ms. Kay Dechant
Mr. Robert Allen
Interchange Building, 59 Woodhn Place, Asheville, N.C. 28801 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer