9210_DukeShearonHarris_SiteAssessmentReport_DIN28100_20170628

Site Assessment Summary Report
Harris Nuclear Plant Closed Landfill
(Permit # 92-10)
New Hill, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7126-14-045
Prepared for:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
5413 Shearon Harris Road
New Hill, North Carolina 27562
Prepared by:
S&ME, Inc.
8646 West Market Street, Suite 105
Greensboro, North Carolina 27409
May 9, 2017
S&ME, Inc. | 8646 W Market St, Ste 105 | Greensboro, NC 27409 | p 336.288.7180 | f 336.288.8980 | www.smeinc.com
May 9, 2017
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
5413 Shearon Harris Road
New Hill, North Carolina 27562
Attention: Mr. Robert T. Wilson, Jr.
Reference: Site Assessment Summary Report
Harris Nuclear Plant-Industrial Landfill - Permit # 92-10
5413 Shearon Harris Road
New Hill, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7126-14-045
Dear Mr. Wilson:
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is pleased to submit the Site Assessment Summary Report for the referenced facility.
Our work was conducted in general accordance with S&ME Proposal Number 71-1400065 dated August
14, 2014 and the terms and conditions of the eMax Master Contract 8457 (Contract No. 02760931;
Amendment 1) between Duke Energy and S&ME.
We appreciate each and every opportunity to provide our services to you and to Duke Energy. Please do
not hesitate to contact us with any questions or when we may be of further service.
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
John Whitehead Edmund Q.B. Henriques, P.G.
Senior Professional/Project Manager Senior Geologist
[e-mail] [e-mail]
Lyndal A. Butler
Environmental Scientist
[e-mail]
Site Assessment Summary Report
Harris Nuclear Plant-Industrial Landfill - Permit # 92-10
New Hill, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7126-14-045
May 9, 2017 ii
Table of Contents
1.0 Background ............................................................................................................. 1
2.0 Geology / Hydrogeology ...................................................................................... 1
3.0 Site Conceptual Model Development ............................................................... 2
4.0 Assessment Activities ........................................................................................... 3
4.1 Soil Borings and Monitoring Well Installations ........................................................... 3
4.2 Groundwater Sampling and Analyses .......................................................................... 4
4.3 Slug Testing ....................................................................................................................... 5
5.0 Findings ................................................................................................................... 5
5.1 Groundwater Flow Direction .......................................................................................... 5
5.2 Groundwater Analytical Results .................................................................................... 6
6.0 Conclusions ............................................................................................................ 7
List of Figures
Figure 1 – Site Location Map
Figure 2 – Monitoring Well Locations
Figure 3 - Bedrock Monitoring Well Groundwater Occurrence
Figure 4 – Cross Section A-A’
Figure 5 – Cross Section B-B’
List of Tables
Table 1 - Well Construction and Groundwater Elevation Data
Table 2 – Summary of Groundwater Sampling Field Parameters
Table 3 – Summary of Groundwater Analyses Results-Detection
Table 4 – Summary of Hydraulic Conductivity Values
Appendices
Appendix I – Figures
Appendix II – Tables
Appendix III – Boring Logs, Completion Reports and Well Construction Records
Appendix I V – Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Field Forms
Appendix V – Laboratory Analytical Report
Appendix VI – Slug Testing Data
Site Assessment Summary Report
Harris Nuclear Plant-Industrial Landfill - Permit # 92-10
New Hill, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7126-14-045
May 9, 2017 1
1.0 Background
The closed landfill is located at the Duke Energy, Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant in New Hill North Carolina
(see Figure 1). In accordance with the Closure of the Harris Nuclear Plant, Unlined Industrial Landfill Unit;
New Hill, North Carolina; FACILITY PERMIT #: 92-10, letter from the NCDEQ dated May 25, 2005; this
unlined industrial landfill was closed and covered under NCDEQ Solid Waste Permit No. 92-10. The
NCDEQ letter dated May 25, 2005, addressing the closure of this unlined Industrial landfill referenced Rule
0.510. As a 0.500 landfill the compliance boundary would be established 500 feet from the waste
boundary, or at the property line; whichever is closer to the waste boundary. The review boundary would
be established halfway between the waste boundary and compliance boundary. Figure 2 depicts the
approximate location of landfill waste boundary, review boundary, and compliance boundary. The landfill
cells were reportedly trench style units. Figure 2 depicts the two landfill cells (Cells 1 and 3) known to
contain waste, the third cell (Cell 2) was not used for waste disposal.
Currently, monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-6, and MW-7 comprise the groundwater
monitoring network for the closed landfill. As part of post-closure monitoring, these wells are sampled on
a semi-annual basis and the collected groundwater samples analyzed for Appendix I VOCs, 8-RCRA
Metals, and sulfate. Analytical results are compared with the 15A North Carolina Administrative Code
(NCAC) 2L .0200 groundwater quality standards (2L Standard) or the NCDEQ Interim Maximum Allowable
Concentrations (IMACs) when no 2L Standard is published.
For at least the past two post-closure monitoring events performed during April and October 2016,
analytical results of the monitoring well groundwater samples indicated one or more VOC detections at
monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-7, with concentrations greater than the corresponding 2L Standard.
Both of these monitoring wells (MW-1 and MW-7) are located less than 100 feet from the landfill limits of
waste and are substantially within the 500 foot compliance boundary. Monitoring well MW-2, located
near the review boundary, has also had detections of VOCs with one VOC exceeding a 2L standard for the
last two monitoring events.
At monitoring well MW-7, some of the detected VOCs have exhibited apparent trends of increasing
concentrations over time. In contrast VOCs detected at monitoring well MW-1 have exhibited trends of
declining or stable concentrations over time.
Based on the detection of VOCs at monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-7 with concentrations greater than
the corresponding 2L Standards, a Work Plan was developed to outline the actions to be undertaken to
initiate an assessment of groundwater quality down-gradient of these wells. S&ME’s Work Plan dated
October 17, 2016, was submitted to the NCDEQ on October 27, 2016, and approved by the NCDEQ on
November 1, 2016.
2.0 Geology / Hydrogeology
According to the North Carolina Geologic Map, 1985, the subject site is located in an area underlain by
rock that is part of the Newark Super Group. The Newark Super Group is one of a series of sedimentary
rift valley structures worldwide resulting from movements in the continental plates during the Triassic
period. The Newark Super Group is located in the Eastern Piedmont area of North America, approximately
Site Assessment Summary Report
Harris Nuclear Plant-Industrial Landfill - Permit # 92-10
New Hill, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7126-14-045
May 9, 2017 2
parallel to the coastline and extending roughly from Pennsylvania to northern Florida. The Newark Super
Group is divided into several separate basins, and the subject site is located within the Deep River Basin.
The underlying rock present in the vicinity of the site can be classified as sedimentary rocks of the
Chatham Group, which can consist of shales, sandstones, and coarse conglomerates in a fine-grained
matrix. These sedimentary units are reported to dip gently eastward. Intrusive diabase dikes and sills are
known to locally cross-cut these sedimentary deposits.
From a hydrogeological stand point, these deposits are generally massive in texture with bedrock
permeability primarily available in faults, joints and fractures. Often the dense nature of these deposits
makes determining if and where groundwater is present in the overlying residual aquifer challenging.
Landfill monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 were drilled in 1986. The well construction records for
these monitoring wells contain sparse geologic information concerning when or if bedrock was
encountered. Water zones were not indicated on the Well Construction Records for monitoring wells
MW-1 through MW-3.
Monitoring wells MW-6 and MW-7, installed during 2003, were reported as screened within a portion of a
bedrock aquifer. Field logs described the bedrock as a Conglomerate. The Well Construction Record for
monitor well MW-6 indicated water zones at depths of 63 feet and 67 feet below ground surface, and the
Field Borehole Log stated “Significant water noted at 68 feet, boring dry to that point.” The Well
Construction Record for monitor well MW-7 did not indicate water zones, and the Field Borehole Log
stated “Groundwater seam at 53 feet. Dry drilling until that point.”
Previous groundwater level data indicated that monitoring wells MW-6 and MW-7 exhibit artesian
conditions, representative of the intersected portions of the bedrock aquifer. Development of relevant
groundwater elevation contours for the landfill area was not practical with the previous monitoring well
network due to the following factors.
♦The long-axis of the landfill unit parallels the axis of a local topographic ridge. Using topography
as a guide to estimate groundwater flow directions, some degree of radial groundwater flow is
expected within the shallow groundwater aquifer underlying the landfill. Considering the
locations of monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3 relative to the axis of the ridge,
groundwater elevation data for these points were not contoured.
♦Monitoring wells MW-6 and MW-7 were screened in the bedrock aquifer; however, it was
unknown if wells MW-1 through MW-3 were screened in the bedrock aquifer or the overlying
unconsolidated aquifer
3.0 Site Conceptual Model Development
Potential data gaps were assessed during the development of a site conceptual model for further
assessment of the landfill area. To address the lack of information regarding probable locations for
bedrock fractures and diabase dikes or sills in the study area, THG Geophysics, Ltd. was contracted to
perform geophysical surveys to image possible bedrock fractures and mafic-rich dikes in the immediate
area of the closed landfill.
Site Assessment Summary Report
Harris Nuclear Plant-Industrial Landfill - Permit # 92-10
New Hill, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7126-14-045
May 9, 2017 3
A Very Low Frequency (VLF) survey and Electrical Imaging (EI) survey were completed during September
2016 to image possible fractures in bedrock. A magnetometer survey was conducted to survey the landfill
area for the potential presence of mafic-rich1 dikes or sills, referred to hereafter as diabase. Fractures are
anticipated to act as conduits, providing significant control over the migration of groundwater in the
bedrock aquifer. Diabase dikes often act as local barriers to groundwater flow. Based on our experience,
the margins of diabase dikes can be fractured.
The locations of survey imaged fractures and probable diabase features are depicted on Figure 2. The
solid lines shown indicative of facture and diabase features are based on interpretations of the direction
and interconnection of imaged features detected between data collection transects. This figure was used
to examine potential spatial correlations between the imaged fractures and diabase features relative to
the waste disposal unit and the known distribution of dissolved phase groundwater contaminants. As
depicted in Figure 2, the geophysical surveys imaged two fracture zones striking generally north – south
and dipping toward the west, and one vertical fracture zone striking generally east - west. These features
appear to underlie portions of the landfill. Indications of a diabase feature striking generally north - south
were detected approximately 200 feet east of the landfill.
Our conceptual site model for the landfill assumes that water percolates downward from the land surface,
interacts with landfill contents in the waste management units, then continues to migrate downward into
the underlying groundwater aquifer. Due to the tight nature of the surround geologic formations,
groundwater flow and dissolved phase contaminant migration are largely controlled by fractures and the
diabase features. Thus groundwater migrating downward beneath the landfill may intersect the east –
west striking fracture and based upon head pressures, migrate east or west along this fracture as a
preferential flow path. When groundwater migrating along the east – west fracture intersects one of the
imaged north – south striking fractures, these may also become preferential flow paths, with flow
controlled by head pressures. It is possible that the diabase feature east of the landfill may inhibit further
eastward migration of groundwater, and if present, fractures on the margins of the diabase may be
preferred flow paths to the north or south. The hypothetical function of the diabase as a local barrier to
groundwater flow, may in part explain the observed absence of VOCs in the groundwater at monitoring
well MW-6.
4.0 Assessment Activities
The following sections summarize the assessment activities completed pursuant to the approved Work
Plan.
4.1 Soil Borings and Monitoring Well Installations
Hollow-stem auger soil borings B-1 and B-2 were completed at locations adjacent to existing monitoring
wells MW-2 and MW-1, respectively. Soil borings B-1 and B-2 encountered rock at approximate depths of
19 feet and 24 feet below ground surface, respectively. The bore-holes were left open for approximately
1 A magnetometer can measure properties of bedrock that are consistent with those of mafic-rich rocks;
however, it cannot determine actual rock compositions. Given that diabase rocks, a mafic-rich rock, have
been mapped in the area by others, the term diabase is utilized herein for simplicity of discussion.
Site Assessment Summary Report
Harris Nuclear Plant-Industrial Landfill - Permit # 92-10
New Hill, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7126-14-045
May 9, 2017 4
24 hours to measure the depth to water. Each boring was abandoned after water level data collection was
complete. An Environmental Staff Professional was on-site to observe drilling and to classify the soils.
Boring logs for soil borings B-1 @ MW-2 and B-2 @ MW-1 are included in Appendix III.
Two new monitoring wells were installed at locations approximated on Figure 2. Monitoring well MW-8
was installed to target the down-dip extension of the nearby north - south striking fracture zone.
Monitoring well MW-9 was installed to target the possible fractures along the margin of the imaged
diabase. These monitoring well locations were selected based on the site conceptual model, targeting
locations near the review boundary and along probable flow paths for groundwater constituents of
concern detected at monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-7. The monitoring wells were constructed in
accordance with the Solid Waste Sections requirement and the requirements specified under NCAC 2C.
The following summarizes basic tasks associated with the installation of the new monitoring wells:
♦The newly-installed monitoring wells were installed as Type II PVC monitoring wells with pre-
packed screens designed to monitor the uppermost prevalent aquifer. Two-inch diameter
Schedule 40 PVC casing and screens were installed in the mud-rotary auger borings / rock-core
borings. A bentonite seal was installed above the well screen and the annulus space between the
borehole wall and the well casing was grouted up to the ground surface. Each monitoring well
was completed at the surface by enclosing the casing within a protective cover installed to a
height approximately three feet above ground surface, and encased within a 2-foot by 2-foot
concrete pad installed at the ground surface. Well Completion Reports describing well
construction details are included in Appendix III.
♦An Environmental Staff Professional was on-site to observe drilling, to classify the soils and rock,
and determine site-specific well construction details based on observed subsurface conditions.
Well Completion Reports describing subsurface observations are included in Appendix III.
♦Depth to groundwater measurements were measured relative to each monitoring well top of
casing on October 19, 2016 (Table 1).
♦Drilling equipment was decontaminated prior to use at each location.
♦Each newly-installed monitoring well was developed using an electric submersible pump to
remove visible clay, silt, and sand particles that may have been introduced into the filter pack
during installation.
♦A registered land surveyor was subcontracted to determine the coordinates for each new well and
the top of casing elevations (Table 1).
♦A Well Construction Record (Form GW-1) was prepared for each newly-installed monitoring well
and submitted to the NCDEQ within 30-days of well completion (Appendix III).
4.2 Groundwater Sampling and Analyses
Following well installation and development, groundwater samples were obtained from monitoring wells
MW- 8 and MW-9 by S&ME on March 20, 2017 using low-flow sampling methods consistent with those
utilized at the landfill for routine site post-closure monitoring. New tubing was used at each well to
collect the samples. The Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Field forms (Appendix IV) indicate that
groundwater flow rates during purging and sampling ranged from approximately 50 milliliters/minute to
60 milliliters/minute. During the low-flow sampling field parameters of temperature, pH, conductivity,
dissolved oxygen (DO), oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), and turbidity were measured at the time
intervals recorded on the Low Flow Sampling Log until parameters stabilized.
Site Assessment Summary Report
Harris Nuclear Plant-Industrial Landfill - Permit # 92-10
New Hill, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7126-14-045
May 9, 2017 5
The low-flow sampling technique employed successfully obtained groundwater samples from the
groundwater monitoring wells with stable turbidity values ranging from 26.2 to 34.6 Nephelometric
Turbidity Units (NTUs). Turbidity was higher than the goal of 10 NTU, a condition that will likely improve
following additional purging of these newly installed wells. Upon meeting the stabilization goals or using
professional judgment, a groundwater sample was collected from each well. As quality control/quality
assurance measures, a duplicate sample (Dup) and a field blank sample (Field Blank) were each collected
at monitoring well MW-8. Table 2 includes a summary of the field indicator parameters measured.
The collected samples were placed under chain-of custody and submitted to PACE for laboratory analyses.
The collected groundwater samples were prepared and submitted for analysis for Appendix I VOCs, 8-
RCRA Metals, and Sulfate, consistent with the suite of analyses used during post-closure care monitoring.
4.3 Slug Testing
Rising and falling head slug tests were performed on each the newly-installed monitoring wells. The
collected data was analyzed by the Bouwer-Rice Method to provide estimated hydraulic conductivities for
each well location. Slug testing data is provided in Appendix VI.
Monitoring well MW-8 is screened in an unconfined, unconsolidated water table aquifer. Conductivity
values for MW-8 ranged from 6.33E-02 feet/day for the slug out test to 7.10E-02 for the slug in test.
Monitoring well MW-9 is screened in a confined, consolidated groundwater aquifer. Conductivity values
for MW-9 ranged from 1.06E-02 feet/day for the slug in test to 1.18E-02 for the slug out test. It should be
noted that the Bouwer-Rice Method is used to determine hydraulic conductivities in unconfined,
heterogeneous aquifers; however, it is noted that Bouwer-Rice points out that this solution method also
should give a reasonable estimate of hydraulic conductivity in confining aquifers. Therefore, the Bouwer-
Rice method was used to provide the above for estimation purposes only.
5.0 Findings
5.1 Groundwater Flow Direction
Static water levels in monitoring wells were measured on March 20, 2017. As summarized in Table 1, the
depths to the water table ranged from 0.0 feet below top of well casing at MW-7 to 27.82 feet below the
top of well casing at MW-3. For this event, the groundwater elevation at each monitoring well was
calculated by subtracting the depth to static water level from the top of casing elevation. Artesian
conditions were observed at monitoring well MW-7. Rather than rejecting this data point the top of
casing elevation was utilized to provide a minimum groundwater elevation for the examination of
groundwater elevations.
The monitoring well network includes newly-installed monitoring well MW-8 completed and screened
within the water table aquifer, and newly-installed monitoring well MW-9 completed and screened within
a bedrock aquifer. Based on provided Field Borehole Logs and Well Construction Records for previously
installed monitoring wells, MW-6 and MW-7 are screened in a bedrock aquifer. Based on the
observations recorded for soil boring SB-1 @ MW-2 and SB-2 @ MW-1 performed by S&ME during
December 2016, monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 are also screened in a bedrock aquifer. Based on the
Site Assessment Summary Report
Harris Nuclear Plant-Industrial Landfill - Permit # 92-10
New Hill, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7126-14-045
May 9, 2017 6
similar subsurface descriptions provided for monitoring well MW-3 to those of monitoring wells MW-1
and MW-2, and on the similar topographic positions observed at monitoring well locations MW-2 and
MW-3, monitoring well MW-3 is assumed to be screened in a bedrock aquifer. Monitoring wells MW-6
and MW-7 are screened in a bedrock aquifer for which the observed water levels for these monitoring
wells indicate artesian conditions in the intersected portions of the bedrock aquifer.
Figure 3 depicts the observed groundwater elevations for each monitoring well and projected
groundwater elevation contours represented by monitor wells screened in a bedrock aquifer. The
estimated potentiometric surface data suggests an estimated hydraulic gradient of 0.05 between wells
MW-7 and MW-1, and 0.04 between wells MW-7 and MW-9. Based on the site conceptual model the
diabase dike imaged by the geophysical survey and striking generally north to south may act like a barrier
to groundwater migrating to the east of the closed landfill. Groundwater migrating in the bedrock aquifer
is presumed to predominantly flow along the fractured rock pathways under the influence of head
pressures.
Figures 4 and 5 were prepared utilizing available boring log data, geophysical survey findings, and
groundwater elevation data obtained during this assessment. These geologic cross-sections present
known data and interpretations of the data for portions of the area assessed.
Based on the presence of one monitoring well, MW-8, known to be screened within the unconsolidated,
water table aquifer, a figure depicting groundwater elevation contours in the unconfined water table
aquifer was not prepared. It was recognized that the long-axis of the landfill unit parallels the axis of a
local topographic ridge. Using topography as a guide to estimate groundwater flow directions, some
degree of radial groundwater flow is expected within the shallow groundwater aquifer underlying the
landfill.
Considering the above stated limitations to the preparation of unconfined water table elevation contours,
groundwater flow rate calculations were not prepared for this monitoring report.
5.2 Groundwater Analytical Results
Table 3 provides a summary of the analytes detected by the laboratory analyses for the groundwater
samples obtained from monitoring wells MW-8 and MW-9 on March 20, 2017, as well as a summary of
the analytical results for the October 19, 2016, post-closure monitoring event. The table also provides the
laboratory data qualifiers, corresponding method detection limits, and the corresponding 2L Standards for
reference. Appendix I volatile organic compounds, certain 8-RCRA metals, and Sulfate were detected;
however, the detected concentrations were less than the corresponding 2L Standards. The complete
laboratory reports are included in Appendix IV.
For this monitoring event, the field measured pH for groundwater at monitoring well MW-8 was reported
as 5.0. This value is outside of the 6.5 – 8.5 range published under the 2L Standards.
During this monitoring event a duplicate sample labeled “Dup” was collected at monitoring well MW-8
and a field blank sample labeled “Field Blank” was collected near MW-8. Both samples were analyzed for
VOCs using EPA Method 8260, the 8-RCRA metals using EPA Methods 6010 and 7470, and Sulfate using
EPA Method 300.0. As summarized in Table 3, analytical results for duplicate sample “Dup” show good
correlation with the analytical results for sample MW-8, with the exception of Chromium. Chromium was
Site Assessment Summary Report
Harris Nuclear Plant-Industrial Landfill - Permit # 92-10
New Hill, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7126-14-045
May 9, 2017 7
reported in the duplicate sample at a concentration of 9.5 µg/L, but was not reported above the
laboratory detection limit of 2.5 µg/L in the MW-8 groundwater sample.
Analytical results for field blank sample “Field Blank” reported no concentration above the detection limit,
with the exception of 1,2-Dichloroethane at an estimated concentration of 0.30 µg/L. 1,2-Dichloroethane
was also reported in groundwater samples MW-8, MW-9, and the duplicate sample DUP, at estimated
concentrations ranging from 0.25 µg/L to 0.31 µg/L.
1,2-Dichloroethane was reported for analysis of the laboratory method blank at an estimated
concentrations of 0.25 µg/L, with a detection limit of 0.24 µg/L. Therefore, the reported concentrations of
1,2-Dichloroethane in monitor well samples are not believed to represent groundwater quality conditions.
Chloromethane was reported at estimated concentrations less than the 2L standard in monitoring well
sample MW-9 and in the duplicate sample; however, duplicate sample DUP was collected at monitoring
well MW-8. Chloromethane was also reported in the duplicate sample only during the October 2016
monitoring event. The reported concentrations of Chloromethane may be related to laboratory
operations and are not believed to represent groundwater quality conditions.
6.0 Conclusions
This additional assessment was completed in general accordance with the approved Work Plan. Potential
data gaps were assessed during the development of the Work Plan and associated site conceptual model
for this additional assessment of the landfill area. To address the lack of information regarding probable
locations for bedrock fractures and diabase dikes or sills in the study area, geophysical surveys were
performed to image possible bedrock fractures and diabase dikes in the immediate area of the closed
landfill. Monitoring wells MW-8 and MW-9 were installed based on the geophysical data and site
conceptual model, targeting locations near the review boundary and along probable flow paths for
groundwater constituents of concern previously detected at monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-7. The
completion of soil borings adjacent to monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 confirmed that these wells were
screened in a bedrock aquifer, closing the data gap regarding the nature of subsurface conditions at these
locations.
Subsurface conditions and groundwater elevation data obtained during this assessment suggested that
first water, or a water table aquifer, was observed in unconsolidated material by monitoring well MW-8
located north of the landfill area. Shallow groundwater flow from monitoring well MW-8 is likely to the
east toward Shearon Harris Reservoir. Radial flow conditions ranging from east to south from the landfill
area are indicated by groundwater occurrence observed in monitoring wells screened in a confined or
partially confined bedrock aquifer, including MW-1, MW-2, MW-6, MW-7, and as assumed in monitoring
well MW-3. The potentiometric surface indicated by groundwater elevations obtained from the well
network provide an estimate of bedrock groundwater flow directions.
Groundwater analytical results for monitoring wells MW-8 and MW-9 indicate that:
•Target analytes were not detected in newly-installed monitoring well MW-8 at concentrations
greater than the corresponding 2L standards. An estimated concentration of 1,2-Dichloroethane
was also reported in the laboratory method blank, and it not believed to represent groundwater
Site Assessment Summary Report
Harris Nuclear Plant-Industrial Landfill - Permit # 92-10
New Hill, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7126-14-045
May 9, 2017 8
quality conditions. Tetrachloroethane was reported at an estimated concentration (0.49 µg/L,
detection limit = 0.46 µg/L) less than the corresponding 2L standard of 0.7 µg/L; however,
Tetrachloroethane was not reported in groundwater samples representing the landfill area during
October 2016.
•Target analytes were not detected in newly-installed monitoring well MW-9 at concentrations
greater than the corresponding 2L standards. An estimated concentration of 1,2-Dichloroethane
was also reported in the laboratory method blank, and is not believed to represent groundwater
quality conditions. 1,1-Dichlroroethane and cis-1,2-Dichloroethane were reported at
concentrations of 1.3 µg/L and 1.4 µg/L, respectively, each less than the corresponding 2L
standards. Monitoring well MW-9 is located in a generally downgradient location relative to
monitoring well MW-7. 1,1-Dichlroroethane and cis-1,2-Dichloroethane were reported at
concentrations of 94.0 µg/L and 90.3 µg/L, respectively, in monitoring well MW-7 during October
2016.
•VOC detections in newly-installed monitoring well MW-9, located downgradient of the landfill
area and downgradient of impacted monitoring well MW-7, may represent the leading edge of
the dissolved VOC plume in a bedrock aquifer. VOCs were not reported in groundwater samples
collected from monitoring well MW-6 during October 2016. Monitoring wells MW-6 and MW-7
are located along an inferred, east-west trending vertical fracture. However, monitoring well MW-
6 is also located east of and on the opposite side of an apparent north-south trending Diabase
dike. The Diabase dike appears to influence groundwater flow conditions and the migration of
VOCs downgradient of the landfill area.
Existing compliance monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-7 were located less than 100 feet from the landfill
limits of waste and substantially within the 500 foot compliance boundary. Monitoring wells MW-8 and
MW-9 installed as part of this assessment were located near the landfill review boundary based on the
site conceptual model and along probable flow paths for groundwater constituents of concern previously
detected at monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-7. Based on the findings for this assessment we recommend
that Duke Energy Progress LLC request approval from the NCDEQ for the removal of monitoring wells
MW-1 and MW-7 from the semi-annual post-closure groundwater monitoring program and replace them
with monitoring wells MW-8 and MW-9. These two new monitoring wells would provide data for
groundwater quality at or near the review boundary.
Appendices
Appendix I – Figures
S
h
e
a
r
o
n

H
a
r
r
i
s
N
u
c
l
e
a
r

P
l
a
n
t
Closed Industrial LandfillPermit No. 92-10
3
0
1

Z
i
m
a

P
a
r
k

R
o
a
d
S
p
a
r
t
a
n
b
u
r
g
,

S
o
u
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a

2
9
3
0
1
P
h
o
n
e

8
6
4
.
5
7
4
.
2
3
6
0
F
a
x

8
6
4
.
5
7
6
.
8
7
3
0
W
W
W
.
S
M
E
I
N
C
.
C
O
M
S
i
t
e

L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n

M
a
p
S
h
e
a
r
o
n

H
a
r
r
i
s

N
u
c
l
e
a
r

P
l
a
n
t
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l

L
a
n
d
f
i
l
l

P
e
r
m
i
t

N
o
.

9
2
-
1
0
N
e
w

H
i
l
l
,

N
o
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
1
1" ≈ 2000'7126-16-045 February 6, 2017jww
2
0
0
0
G
R
A
P
H
I
C

S
C
A
L
E

(
F
T
)
0
2
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
M
W
-
6
M
W
-
7
M
W
-
1
M
W
-
2
MW-3 250-ft. Review B
o
u
n
d
a
r
y
500-ft. Compliance Bo
u
n
d
a
r
y
Ce
l
l

3
Cel
l

2
Cel
l

1
M
W
-
9
M
W
-
8
3
0
1

Z
i
m
a

P
a
r
k

R
o
a
d
S
p
a
r
t
a
n
b
u
r
g
,

S
o
u
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a

2
9
3
0
1
P
h
o
n
e

8
6
4
.
5
7
4
.
2
3
6
0
F
a
x

8
6
4
.
5
7
6
.
8
7
3
0
W
W
W
.
S
M
E
I
N
C
.
C
O
M
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

W
e
l
l

L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
S
h
e
a
r
o
n

H
a
r
r
i
s

N
u
c
l
e
a
r

P
l
a
n
t
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l

L
a
n
d
f
i
l
l

P
e
r
m
i
t

N
o
.

9
2
-
1
0
N
e
w

H
i
l
l
,

N
o
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
2
1" ≈ 200'7126-16-045 April 26, 2017rdm
L
e
g
e
n
d
2
0
0
G
R
A
P
H
I
C

S
C
A
L
E

(
F
T
)
0
2
0
0
4
0
0
I
n
f
e
r
r
e
d

F
r
a
c
t
u
r
e
A
r
r
o
w

I
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s

D
i
p

D
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
M
a
g
n
e
t
i
c

L
i
n
e
a
m
e
n
t
(
I
n
f
e
r
r
e
d

M
a
g
n
e
t
i
t
e
-
r
i
c
h

M
a
f
i
c

D
i
k
e
)
A
r
r
o
w

I
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s

D
i
p

D
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

W
e
l
l
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

W
e
l
l
A
s
s
u
m
e
d

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

F
l
o
w

D
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
A
l
o
n
g

S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l

F
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
L
a
n
d
f
i
l
l

C
e
l
l

C
o
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g

W
a
s
t
e
L
a
n
d
f
i
l
l

C
e
l
l

N
o
t

U
s
e
d

f
o
r
W
a
s
t
e

D
i
s
p
o
s
a
l
M
W
-
6
M
W
-
7
M
W
-
1
M
W
-
2
MW-3 250-ft. Review B
o
u
n
d
a
r
y
500-ft. Compliance Bo
u
n
d
a
r
y
Ce
l
l

3
Cel
l

2
Cel
l

1
M
W
-
9
M
W
-
8
3
0
1

Z
i
m
a

P
a
r
k

R
o
a
d
S
p
a
r
t
a
n
b
u
r
g
,

S
o
u
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a

2
9
3
0
1
P
h
o
n
e

8
6
4
.
5
7
4
.
2
3
6
0
F
a
x

8
6
4
.
5
7
6
.
8
7
3
0
W
W
W
.
S
M
E
I
N
C
.
C
O
M
B
e
d
r
o
c
k

M
o
n
i
t
o
r

W
e
l
l

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

O
c
c
u
r
r
e
n
c
e
S
h
e
a
r
o
n

H
a
r
r
i
s

N
u
c
l
e
a
r

P
l
a
n
t
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l

L
a
n
d
f
i
l
l

P
e
r
m
i
t

N
o
.

9
2
-
1
0
N
e
w

H
i
l
l
,

N
o
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
3
1" ≈ 200'7126-16-045 February 6, 2017jww
2
0
0
G
R
A
P
H
I
C

S
C
A
L
E

(
F
T
)
0
2
0
0
4
0
0
I
n
f
e
r
r
e
d

F
r
a
c
t
u
r
e
A
r
r
o
w

I
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s

D
i
p

D
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
M
a
g
n
e
t
i
c

L
i
n
e
a
m
e
n
t
(
I
n
f
e
r
r
e
d

M
a
g
n
e
t
i
t
e
-
r
i
c
h

M
a
f
i
c

D
i
k
e
)
A
r
r
o
w

I
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s

D
i
p

D
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

W
e
l
l
G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

C
o
n
t
o
u
r
T
o
p

o
f

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
L
e
g
e
n
d
A
s
s
u
m
e
d

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

F
l
o
w

D
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
A
l
o
n
g

S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l

F
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
L
a
n
d
f
i
l
l

C
e
l
l

C
o
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g

W
a
s
t
e
L
a
n
d
f
i
l
l

C
e
l
l

N
o
t

U
s
e
d

f
o
r
W
a
s
t
e

D
i
s
p
o
s
a
l
254 258 262 266
2
7
0
2
7
4
(
2
7
4
.
9
8
)
(
2
7
4
.
9
8
)
(
2
5
6
.
7
1
)
(
2
5
4
.
4
0
)
(
2
5
5
.
0
0
)
(28
8
.
2
1
)
(
2
5
5
.
0
8
)
(251.33)
N
o
t
e
:
G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

o
c
c
u
r
r
e
n
c
e

s
h
o
w
n

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s

p
o
r
t
i
o
n
s

o
f

t
h
e
b
e
d
r
o
c
k

a
q
u
i
f
e
r

i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
e
d

a
t

m
o
n
i
t
o
r

w
e
l
l
s

M
W
-
1
,

M
W
-
2
,
M
W
-
3
,

M
W
-
7

a
n
d

M
W
-
9
.

M
o
n
i
t
o
r

w
e
l
l

M
W
-
8

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s

t
h
e
u
n
c
o
n
s
o
l
i
d
a
t
e
d

s
h
a
l
l
o
w

a
q
u
i
f
e
r
.

M
o
n
i
t
o
r

w
e
l
l

M
W
-
6

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s
g
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

o
c
c
u
r
r
e
n
c
e

a
c
r
o
s
s

a
n

a
s
s
u
m
e
d

g
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

f
l
o
w
b
a
r
r
i
e
r

(
d
i
a
b
a
s
e

d
i
k
e
)
.
A
'
A
B
B
'
C
r
o
s
s

S
e
c
t
i
o
n

L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
B
B
'
JOB NO.
SCALE:
DATE:
DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:
FIGURE NO.
8646 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 105
GREENSBORO, NC. 27409
PH. 336-288-7180
FAX. [phone]
WWW.SMEINC.COM
DRAWING PATH:Q:\7126\2016\16-045 - DUKE HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT\4-17\S.Harris X-Sections.dwg
CROSS-SECTION A-A'
INDUSTRIAL LANDFILL PERMIT No. 92-10
NEW HILL, NORTH CAROLINA
AS SHOWN RDM ALB
7126-16-045 APRIL 2017 4
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
B-B'KEY- FRACTURE- DEPTH TO WATER- PROJECTED CROSS SECTION LOCATION- INFERRED FRACTURE- INFERRED MAFIC DIKE- PROJECTED POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE - BED
R
O
C
K

W
E
L
L
MW-3
M
W
-
7
M
W
-
9
B
-
B
'
COVER
C
E
L
L

1
CELL 2CELL 3UNCHARACTERIZED
S
I
L
T
Y

C
L
A
Y
R
O
C
K
C
O
N
G
L
O
M
E
R
A
T
E
S
I
L
T
Y

C
L
A
Y
S
A
N
D
Y

S
I
L
T
S
I
L
T
Y

C
L
A
Y
S
A
N
D
Y

S
I
L
T
A
N
D

S
A
N
D
R
O
C
K

-
S
A
N
D
S
T
O
N
E
S
O
F
T

S
E
A
M
(
D
R
Y
)
S
I
L
T
S
T
O
N
E
S
I
L
T
S
T
O
N
E
290280270260250240230220 ELEV. (FT.)
D
I
P

U
N
D
E
T
E
R
M
I
N
E
D
A
R
T
E
S
I
A
N

C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
S
2
7
4
.
9
8
F
F
F
F
F
M
W
-
6
DIABASE
DIKE
S
I
L
T
Y
C
L
A
Y
A
N
D
C
L
A
Y
ROCK
CONGLOMERATE
1
7
'
500'A
A
'
V
E
R
T
I
C
A
L
T
O
T
A
L

D
E
P
T
H
:

6
8
.
5
'
G
R
A
P
H
I
C

S
C
A
L
E
0
0
V
E
R
T
I
C
A
L

S
C
A
L
E
:

1
"

=

1
0
'
H
O
R
I
Z
O
N
T
A
L

S
C
A
L
E
:

1
"

=

1
0
0
'
1
0
5
5
0
1
0
0
JOB NO.
SCALE:
DATE:
DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:
FIGURE NO.
8646 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 105
GREENSBORO, NC. 27409
PH. 336-288-7180
FAX. [phone]
WWW.SMEINC.COM
DRAWING PATH:Q:\7126\2016\16-045 - DUKE HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT\4-17\S.Harris X-Sections.dwg
CROSS-SECTION A-A'
INDUSTRIAL LANDFILL PERMIT No. 92-10
NEW HILL, NORTH CAROLINA
AS SHOWN RDM ALB
7126-16-045 APRIL 2017 5
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
MW-2
M
W
-
7
M
W
-
8
A
-
A
'
C
O
V
E
R
C
E
L
L

1
C
E
L
L

2
C
E
L
L

3
SILTY CLAYCLAYSANDSTONE
S
I
L
T
Y

C
L
A
Y
A
R
T
E
S
I
A
N

C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
S
2
7
4
.
9
8
C
L
A
Y
S
A
N
D
S
I
L
T
Y
S
A
N
D
S
I
L
T
Y

C
L
A
Y

&

C
L
A
Y
R
O
C
K
C
O
N
G
L
O
M
E
R
A
T
E
(
S
A
N
D
S
T
O
N
E
)
D
I
P

U
N
D
E
T
E
R
M
I
N
E
D
V
E
R
T
I
C
A
L
FFFFFF39.7' TO 40.2' - CLAY SEAM AND UNCONSOLI
D
A
T
E
D
B-B'KEY- FRACTURE- DEPTH TO WATER- PROJECTED CROSS SECTION L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
- INFERRED FRACTURE- INFERRED MAFIC DIKE- PROJECTED POTENTIOMETRIC

S
U
R
F
A
C
E

-

B
E
D
R
O
C
K

W
E
L
L
- PROJECTED POTENTIOMETRIC

S
U
R
F
A
C
E

-

U
N
C
O
N
S
O
L
I
D
A
T
E
D

W
E
L
L
F B
B
'
290280270260250240230220 ELEV. (FT.)
G
R
A
P
H
I
C

S
C
A
L
E
0
0
V
E
R
T
I
C
A
L

S
C
A
L
E
:

1
"

=

1
0
'
H
O
R
I
Z
O
N
T
A
L

S
C
A
L
E
:

1
"

=

1
0
0
'
1
0
5
5
0
1
0
0
Appendix II – Tables
TABLE 1
WELL CONSTRUCTION AND GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA
HARRIS LANDFILL - PERMIT # 92-10
HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
NEW HILL, NORTH CAROLINA
S&ME PROJECT NO. 7126-16-045
Well ID
Date
Installed
Total
Depth
Well
Diameter
Depth to
Top of
Screen
Well Screen
Interval Geology of Screened Northing Easting
Ground
Elevation
Top of Casing
Elevation
Depth to
Groundwater1 Groundwater
Elevation
Interval NAD 83 NAD 83 NAVD 88 NAVD 88 10/19/2016 10/19/2016
(feet)(inches) (feet bgs) (feet bgs)(feet msl.)(feet msl.)(feet)(feet msl.)
MW-1 11/14/1986 98.0 2 87.0 87 - 97 siltstone bedrock 689729.55 2011877.41 276.17 277.17 22.41 254.76
MW-2 11/18/1986 52.5 2 30.0 30 - 40 siltstone bedrock 689078.18 2011527.11 269.42 271.54 14.63 256.91
MW-3 11/24/1986 58.0 2 47.0 47 - 57 clayey, sandy silt 688959.39 2010700.94 277.72 279.88 27.82 252.06
MW-6 12/18/2003 68.5 2 53.5 53.5 - 68.5 conglomeritic bedrock 689960.82 2012032.44 253.97 256.51 1.76 254.75
MW-7 12/18/2003 53.0 2 38.0 38 - 53 conglomeritic bedrock 689780.68 2011515.15 272.82 274.98 0.00 274.98
MW-8 12/13/2016 29.8 2 29.8 29.8 - 14.8 dense sand 689957.21 2011407.23 293.42 296.33 8.68 287.65
MW-9 12/19/2016 40.9 2 40.9 40.9 - 25.9 conglomeritic bedrock 690027.50 2011883.50 266.87 269.79 12.67 257.12
McKim & Creed provided the top of casing elevations and ground surface elevations based on measurements obtained on October 21, 2014.
Well Construction details obtained from Well Construction Records
feet bgs. = feet below ground surface
feet msl. = feet mean sea level
Depth to Groundwater1 = below top of casing
Well MW-7 exhibits artesian conditions, thus the groundwater elevation listed is not a static water level
T:\Projects\2016\Energy\7126-16-045_Duke Energy_Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant_Landfill Assessment\Deliverables\Site Assessment Report\FINAL report\Appendix II_Report Tables_Harris Landfill_FINAL.xls
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD PARAMETERS
HARRIS LANDFILL - PERMIT # 92-10
HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
NEW HILL, NORTH CAROLINA
S&ME PROJECT NO. 7126-16-045
DATE WELL WELL DEPTH TO WATER ODOR PURGE PUMP WELL EVAC PURGED TEMP SPECIFIC pH TURBIDITY ORP DO
ID DEPTH WATER ELEVATION METHOD RATE VOLUME VOLUME DRY?CONDUCTANCE
(feet)(feet)(feet)(mL/min) (gallons) (gallons) (yes/no)(deg C)(μs/cm)(SU)(NTU)(mV-NHE) (mg/L)
3/20/2017 MW-8 29.8 8.68 287.65 None Low Flow 60 4.0 1.1 no 13.6 0.132 5.0 34.6 211 6.7
3/20/2017 MW-9 40.9 12.67 257.12 None Low Flow 50 5.0 1.3 no 17.1 0.477 7.7 26.2 80 4.4
Notes:
1. Field sampling performed by S&ME, Inc. personnel.
2. TEMP = groundwater temperature, measured in degrees Celsius
3. Pump Rate, measured in milliliters/minute
4. Specific Conductance, measured in μs/cm indicates micro Siemens per centimeter.
5. SU indicates Standard Units.
6. NTU indicates Nephelometric Turbidity Units.
7. ORP = Oxidation Reduction Potential, mV-NHE indicates millivolts-Normal Hydrogen Electrode.
8. EVAC = evacuated volume of groundwater
9. DO = dissolved oxygen, measured in milligrams per liter
10. The pH value for MW-2 shown in bold print falls outside of the 6.5 - 8.5 su range published under 15A NCAC 2L Standards
NC SWSL NCAC 2L NCDEQ Federal
Well ID MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-6 MW-7 Duplicate Field Blank MW-8 MW-9 Dup Field Blank Standards IMAC MCLs
Sample ID 2016032917 2016032918 2016032919 2016032920 2016032921 2016032922 2016032923 2017006986 2017006987 2017006988 2017006989
Duplicate MW-6 Duplicate MW-8
Date Collected 10/19/16 10/19/16 10/19/16 10/19/16 10/19/16 10/19/16 10/19/16 03/20/17 03/20/17 03/20/17 03/20/17Detected Analytes (µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)
16 Benzene 0.55J 0.39J < 0.25 < 0.25 < 0.25 < 0.25 < 0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 1 1 --5
39 Chlorobenzene < 0.23 6.7 < 0.23 < 0.23 <0.23 < 0.23 < 0.23 <0.23 <0.23 <0.23 <0.23 3 50 --100
41 Chloroethane 5.8 1.2 < 0.54 < 0.54 8.3 < 0.54 < 0.54 <0.54 <0.54 <0.54 <0.54 10 3,000 --NSE
137 Chloromethane <0.11 <0.11 <0.11 <0.11 <0.11 0.15J <0.11 <0.11 0.34J 0.17J <0.11 1 3 --5
71 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 2.4 < 0.33 < 0.33 < 0.33 < 0.33 < 0.33 <0.33 <0.33 <0.33 <0.33 1 6 --75
75 1,1-Dichloroethane 81.7 9.5 < 0.32 < 0.32 94.0 < 0.32 < 0.32 <0.32 1.3 <0.32 <0.32 5 6 --NSE
77 1,1-Dichloroethene 3.3 <0.56 < 0.56 < 0.56 10.5 < 0.56 < 0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 5 350 --7
76 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.24 <0.24 <0.24 <0.24 0.33J <0.24 <0.24 0.25J 0.31J 0.25J <0.30J 1 0.4 --5
78 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.8 < 0.19 < 0.19 < 0.19 90.3 < 0.19 < 0.19 <0.19 1.4 <0.19 <0.19 5 70 --70
192 Tetrachloroethene <0.46 <0.46 <0.46 <0.46 <0.46 <0.46 <0.46 0.49J <0.46 <0.46 <0.46 1 0.7 --5
201 Trichloroethene 1.9 < 0.47 < 0.47 < 0.47 2.6 < 0.47 < 0.47 <0.47 <0.47 <0.47 <0.47 1 3 --5
211 Vinyl Chloride 0.94J < 0.62 < 0.62 < 0.62 2.7 < 0.62 < 0.62 <0.62 <0.62 <0.62 <0.62 1 0.03 --2
NC SWSL NCAC 2L NCDEQ Federal
Well ID MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-6 MW-7 Duplicate MW-6 Field Blank MW-8 MW-9 Dup Field Blank Standards IMAC MCLs
Sample ID 2016032917 2016032918 2016032919 2016032920 2016032921 2016032922 2016032923 2017006986 2017006987 2017006988 2017006989
Date Collected 10/19/16 10/19/16 10/19/16 10/19/16 10/19/16 10/19/16 10/19/16 03/20/17 03/20/17 03/20/17 03/20/17
Detected Analytes (ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)
14 Arsenic 6.1J <5.0 6.1J <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 10 10 --10
15 Barium 141 40.8 158 304 92.3 310 <2.5 110 231 110 <2.5 100 700 --2,000
51 Chromium <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 9.5 <2.5 10 10 --100
315 Sulfate 1,400 3,500 28,300 3,700 5,700 3,800 <1,000 7,900 9,400 7,900 <500 250,000 250,000 --250,000
Concentrations in shaded cells are greater than the corresponding NCAC 2L Standard
ug/L = concentrations reported in micrograms per liter (ug/L)
< = concentrations is less than the method detection limit shown
NC SWSL = North Carolina Solid Waste Section Limit
J = Concentration reported greater than the method detection limit but less than the SWSL, thus it is considered estimated
NCAC 2L Standards = 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2L .0200, GW Quality Standards for Class GA groundwater.
NCDEQ IMAC = Interim Maximum Allowed Concentration, NCDEQ
Federal MCL = Maximum Concentration Levels, USEPA
ns = no MCL listed, USEPA
na = not analyzed
NSE no NCAC 2L Standard established
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALYSES RESULTS - DETECTIONS
HARRIS LANDFILL - PERMIT # 92-10
HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
NEW HILL, NORTH CAROLINA
S&ME PROJECT NO. 7126-16-045
Sample Locations (October 19, 2016)
Solid
Waste
Section ID
#
Appendix I Volatile Organic Compounds
8-RCRA Metals + Sulfate
Solid
Waste
Section ID
#
Sample Locations
Sample Locations (March 20, 2017)
Sample Locations (March 20, 2017)
Well ID
Slug Test
Completion
Date
Screen Interval
(feet-bgs)Test (K) Slug In ft/day (K) Average
ft/day
Slug In 7.10E-02
Slug Out 6.33E-02
Slug In 1.06E-02
Slug Out 1.18E-02
Notes:
K = hydrualic conductivity
feet-bgs = Feet below ground surface.
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY VALUES
HARRIS LANDFILL - PERMIT # 92-10
HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
NEW HILL, NORTH CAROLINA
S&ME PROJECT NO. 7126-16-045
Hydraulic conductivity determined from rising or falling head test (slug test) data analyzed by Bouwer and Rice Updated
Method (1989) using the Aqtesolv software developed by Hydrosolve, Inc.
MW-8 1/7/2017 14.8 - 29.8 6.72E-02
MW-9 1/6/2017 25.9 - 40.9 1.12E-02
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF 2L STANDARD EXCEEDANCES
HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
NEW HILL, NORTH CAROLINA
S&ME PROJECT NO. 7126-14-013
NC SWSL NCAC 2L NCDEQ Federal
Well ID MW-1 MW-2 MW-7 Standards IMAC MCLs
Sample ID 2016032917 2016032918 2016032921
Date Collected 10/19/16 10/19/16 10/19/16
Detected Analytes (ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)
75 1,1-Dichloroethane 81.7 9.5 94.0 5 6 --ns
78 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 90.3 5 70 --70
211 Vinyl Chloride 0.94J 2.7 1 0.03 --2
Only concentrations greater than the corresponding NCAC 2L Standards are shown
ug/L = concentrations reported in micrograms per liter (ug/L)
NC SWSL = North Carolina Solid Waste Section Limit
NCAC 2L Standards = 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2L .0200, GW Quality Standards for Class GA groundwater
J= Concentration reported greater than the method detection limit but less than the SWSL, thus it is considered estimated
NCDEQ IMAC = Interim Maximum Allowed Concentration, NCDEQ
Federal MCL = Maximum Concentration Levels, USEPA
ns = no MCL listed, USEPA
Solid
Waste
Section ID
#
HARRIS LANDFILL - PERMIT # 92-10
Groundwater Sample Locations
Appendix III – Boring Logs, Completion Reports and Well
Construction Records
CG
BS
FP
TSC
293.42
282.42
279.22
278.62
SILTY CLAY (CL)medium stiff, yellowishred, medium plasticity,
slightly moist, organics(roots) present
CLAY (CH)
stiff, reddish yellow,high plasticity, moist
SILTY SAND (SM)medium dense, lightred yellowish brown,
fine to mediumgrained, slightly moist
CLAY (CL)
hard, dark reddishbrown, slightly moist
0.00
11.00
14.20
14.80
Diameter:
Type:
Interval:
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:
DRILLING METHOD:
DATE COMPLETED:
Type:
Interval:
RISER CASING
0.00 293.42
Neat Grout
0-11
Type:
Interval:
S&ME, Inc.
Mud Rotary with Tri Cone 3 7/8"
12/13/16
GS
COMPLETION REPORT OF WELL No. MW-8
LATITUDE:
LONGITUDE:
TOP OF CASING ELEVATION:
DATUM:
LOGGED BY:
2"
Prepack 0.010" slot
14.8-29.8
Diameter:
Type:
Interval:
#2 Sand
14.2-29.8
NA
NA
NA
SEAL
Diameter:
Type:
Interval:
FILTERPACK
Bentonite11.0-14.2
35.6457595°W
-78.9616045°W
296.33
MSL
A. Culpepper
PROTECTIVE CASING
2"
Schedule 40 PVC
+2.9-14.8
Type:
Interval:
SCREEN
GROUT
STRATA
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
DE
P
T
H
(f
t
.
)
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
(f
t
.
)
LE
G
E
N
D
DESCRIPTION
SY
M
B
O
L
WELL
DETAILS
DE
P
T
H
(f
t
.
)
PROJECT:
PROJECT NO:
PROJECT LOCATION:
Harris GW Assessment7126-16-045
New Hill, NC
Sheet 1 of 2
WATER LEVEL:17.3 feet @ Termination of
Boring/Depth to water 8.68
feet below top of casing
0
5
10
15
TOCGSBS
BOCTSCBSC
TDCG
TOP OF CASINGGROUND SURFACEBENTONITE SEAL
BASE OF OUTER CASINGTOP OF SCREENBOTTOM OF SCREEN
TOTAL DEPTHCEMENT GROUT
LEGEND
COMPLETION REPORT OF
WELL No. MW-8
FILTER PACK
BENTONITE
CEMENT GROUT
FORMATION
STATIC WATER LEVEL
MO
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G

W
E
L
L

7
1
2
6
-
1
6
-
0
4
5

H
A
R
R
I
S

G
W

A
S
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
.
G
P
J

W
I
T
H

C
P
T
.
G
D
T

4
/
2
1
/
1
7
Sheet 1 of 2
BSC
TD
263.62
259.72
SAND (SP)medium dense to verydense, weak red
reddish gray light gray,fine to medium,
slightly moist(continued)
29.80
33.70
HC
STRATA
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
DE
P
T
H
(f
t
.
)
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
(f
t
.
)
LE
G
E
N
D
DESCRIPTION
SY
M
B
O
L
WELL
DETAILS
DE
P
T
H
(f
t
.
)
(See Page 1)
PROJECT:
PROJECT NO:
PROJECT LOCATION:
Harris GW Assessment
7126-16-045
New Hill, NC
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION:
LOGGED BY:
293.4
A. Culpepper
20
25
30
TOCGSBS
BOCTSCBSC
TDCG
TOP OF CASINGGROUND SURFACEBENTONITE SEAL
BASE OF OUTER CASINGTOP OF SCREENBOTTOM OF SCREEN
TOTAL DEPTHCEMENT GROUT
LEGEND
COMPLETION REPORT OF
WELL No. MW-8
FILTER PACK
BENTONITE
CEMENT GROUT
FORMATION
STATIC WATER LEVEL
MO
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G

W
E
L
L

7
1
2
6
-
1
6
-
0
4
5

H
A
R
R
I
S

G
W

A
S
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
.
G
P
J

W
I
T
H

C
P
T
.
G
D
T

4
/
2
1
/
1
7
Sheet 2 of 2
CG 266.87
SILTY CLAY (CL)medium stiff, redbrown, medium
plasticity, slightly moistto dry
SANDY SILT (CL)very stiff, red gray,
slightly moist to dry
SILTY CLAY (CL)hard, red gray, slightlymoist to dry
SANDY SILT (SM)
very dense, gray, dry,low recovery
SAND (SP)very dense, gray, dry
Rock, Sandstone -
light gray, strong rock
0.00
Diameter:
Type:
Interval:
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:
DRILLING METHOD:
DATE COMPLETED:
Type:
Interval:
RISER CASING
0.00 266.87
Neat Grout
25.9-40.9
Type:
Interval:
S&ME, Inc.
Mud Rotary with Tri Cone 3 7/8", HQ Core
12/9/16
GS
COMPLETION REPORT OF WELL No. MW-9
LATITUDE:
LONGITUDE:
TOP OF CASING ELEVATION:
DATUM:
LOGGED BY:
2"
Prepack 0.010" slot
25.9-40.9
Diameter:
Type:
Interval:
#2 Sand
23.9-40.9
NA
NA
NA
SEAL
Diameter:
Type:
Interval:
FILTERPACK
Bentonite20-9-23.9
35.6459521°N
-78.9600014°W
269.79
MSL
A. Culpepper
PROTECTIVE CASING
2"
Schedule 40 PVC
+2.9-25.9
Type:
Interval:
SCREEN
GROUT
STRATA
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
DE
P
T
H
(f
t
.
)
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
(f
t
.
)
LE
G
E
N
D
DESCRIPTION
SY
M
B
O
L
WELL
DETAILS
DE
P
T
H
(f
t
.
)
PROJECT:
PROJECT NO:
PROJECT LOCATION:
Harris GW Assessment7126-16-045
New Hill, NC
Sheet 1 of 2
WATER LEVEL:35.4 feet @ Termination of
boring/Depth to water 12.67
feet below top of casing
0
5
10
15
TOCGSBS
BOCTSCBSC
TDCG
TOP OF CASINGGROUND SURFACEBENTONITE SEAL
BASE OF OUTER CASINGTOP OF SCREENBOTTOM OF SCREEN
TOTAL DEPTHCEMENT GROUT
LEGEND
COMPLETION REPORT OF
WELL No. MW-9
FILTER PACK
BENTONITE
CEMENT GROUT
FORMATION
STATIC WATER LEVEL
MO
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G

W
E
L
L

7
1
2
6
-
1
6
-
0
4
5

H
A
R
R
I
S

G
W

A
S
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
.
G
P
J

W
I
T
H

C
P
T
.
G
D
T

4
/
2
1
/
1
7
Sheet 1 of 2
BS
FP
TSC
BSC
TD
245.97
242.97
240.97
225.97
225.67
strength, massive,RQD 100%, slightlyweathered rock;
medium to fine grained(continued)Rock, Sandstone -
light gray, moderaterock strength,massive, RQD 94%,slightly weatheredrock. medium to
course grained, sharpfracture at 21.9, lowangle, open, clean
slightly fractured21.2-23.1Rock, Siltstone - red
brown, weak tomoderate rockstrength, massive,
RQD 98%, slight tomoderate weathering,
fine grained, fractureat 25.8, low angleopen
Rock, Siltstone, redbrown, weak tomoderate rock
strength, massive,RQD 98%, slight tomoderate weathering.
fracture at 27.1, lowangle open slightoxidationRock, Siltstone, redbrown, weak to
moderate rockstrength, massive,RQD 98%, slight to
moderate weathering.fracture at 33.2, low,open, slight oxidation,
32-34.5 weak, highlyweathered, fracture at35.5, 45°, open, clean,
slight oxidationRock, Siltstone, red
brown, weak tomoderate rockstrength, massive,
RQD 100%, slight tomoderate weathering.no fractures
20.90
23.90
25.90
40.90
41.20
HC
STRATA
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
DE
P
T
H
(f
t
.
)
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
(f
t
.
)
LE
G
E
N
D
DESCRIPTION
SY
M
B
O
L
WELL
DETAILS
DE
P
T
H
(f
t
.
)
(See Page 1)
PROJECT:
PROJECT NO:
PROJECT LOCATION:
Harris GW Assessment
7126-16-045
New Hill, NC
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION:
LOGGED BY:
266.9
A. Culpepper
20
25
30
35
40
TOCGSBS
BOCTSCBSC
TDCG
TOP OF CASINGGROUND SURFACEBENTONITE SEAL
BASE OF OUTER CASINGTOP OF SCREENBOTTOM OF SCREEN
TOTAL DEPTHCEMENT GROUT
LEGEND
COMPLETION REPORT OF
WELL No. MW-9
FILTER PACK
BENTONITE
CEMENT GROUT
FORMATION
STATIC WATER LEVEL
MO
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G

W
E
L
L

7
1
2
6
-
1
6
-
0
4
5

H
A
R
R
I
S

G
W

A
S
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
.
G
P
J

W
I
T
H

C
P
T
.
G
D
T

4
/
2
1
/
1
7
Sheet 2 of 2
3
3
38
50/6
50/3
50/2
4
5
72%
100%
100%
100%
7
9
50/4
50/6
50/3
50/2
3
4
50/4
100%
100%
100%
100%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
SILTY CLAY (CL)medium stiff to to hard, tan purple to red brown,low to medium plasticity, moist to dry
CLAY (CL)hard, red brown, low to medium plasticity, dry
SILTY SAND (SM)
very dense, red brown white, dry
Rock, Conglomerate (sandstone), red, weak tomoderate rock strength, massive, moderate tointense weathering, medium to coarse grained,
unfractrued
Rock, Sandstone- weak red, moderate to strong
rock strength, massive, moderate to intense
weathering, fine to medium grained, unfractured
Rock, Siltstone - weak red, moderate to strong
rock strength, massive, slight weathering,contact angle =low, fine-grained
Rock, Siltstone - weak red, moderate to strongrock strength, massive, slight weathering;
fracture at 27.0, low angle, open, slight
oxidation
THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT PREPARED FOR THE NAMEDPROJECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT REPORT.
BORING, SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN GENERALACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D-1586.
STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT EXACT.
WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY.
1.
2.
3.
4.
PROJECT:B-1 @ MW-2
EASTING:
BORING DEPTH:51.7 ft
LOGGED BY:A. Culpepper
3r
d

6
i
n

/

R
Q
D
GR
A
P
H
I
C
LO
G
N
V
A
L
U
E
DE
P
T
H
(f
e
e
t
)
Page 1 of 2
NOTES:
2n
d

6
i
n

/

R
E
C
DATE DRILLED: 12/8/16
DRILL RIG: CME 750
DRILLER: S&ME, Ray Norwood
HAMMER TYPE: Auto
SAMPLING METHOD: Rock Core, Split spoon
DRILLING METHOD: Mud Rotary with Tri Cone 3 7/8", HQ Core
5
10
15
20
25
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
NORTHING:
ELEVATION:
WATER LEVEL:16.5 feet at 24 hours
REMARKS
1s
t

6
i
n

/

R
U
N

#
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
(f
e
e
t
-
M
S
L
)
WA
T
E
R

L
E
V
E
L
BORING LOG
SA
M
P
L
E

N
O
.
SA
M
P
L
E

T
Y
P
E
BLOW COUNT/ CORE DATA
NOTES: HQ core at 18.6 feet, Water level at 24hours = 16.5 feet; cave in at 24 hours = 50.0 feet.
S&ME Project No. 7126-16-045
Harris GW Assessment
New Hill, NC
S&
M
E

B
O
R
I
N
G

L
O
G

7
1
2
6
-
1
6
-
0
4
5

H
A
R
R
I
S

G
W

A
S
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
.
G
P
J

S
&
M
E
.
G
D
T

4
/
2
1
/
1
7
8060302010
/
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA(blows/ft)
100%
84%
94%
95%
100%
100%
100%
100%
11
12
13
14
Rock, Siltstone - weak red, moderate to strong
rock strength, massive, slight weathering, withSandstone 32-33.2, fracture at 32.2, 45°;fracture at 35.8°, 30°, open, slight oxidation
Rock, Siltstone - weak red, moderate to strong
rock strength, massive, slightly weathered; 39.7- 39.9 gray clay layer, unconsolidated; 39.5-40.2
unconsolidated highly weathered
Rock, Slitstone - weak red, moderate to strong
rock strength, massive, slightly weathered; 42.6& 42.9 fracture, low angle slight oxidation
Rock, Slitstone - weak red, moderate to strong
rock strength, massive, slightly weathered, 46.9
fracture, low angle, open, slight oxidation;Fracture at 46.0
Boring terminated at 51.7 ft
HC
THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT PREPARED FOR THE NAMEDPROJECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT REPORT.
BORING, SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN GENERALACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D-1586.
STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT EXACT.
WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY.
1.
2.
3.
4.
PROJECT:B-1 @ MW-2
EASTING:
BORING DEPTH:51.7 ft
LOGGED BY:A. Culpepper
3r
d

6
i
n

/

R
Q
D
GR
A
P
H
I
C
LO
G
N
V
A
L
U
E
DE
P
T
H
(f
e
e
t
)
Page 2 of 2
NOTES:
2n
d

6
i
n

/

R
E
C
DATE DRILLED: 12/8/16
DRILL RIG: CME 750
DRILLER: S&ME, Ray Norwood
HAMMER TYPE: Auto
SAMPLING METHOD: Rock Core, Split spoon
DRILLING METHOD: Mud Rotary with Tri Cone 3 7/8", HQ Core
35
40
45
50
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
NORTHING:
ELEVATION:
WATER LEVEL:16.5 feet at 24 hours
REMARKS
1s
t

6
i
n

/

R
U
N

#
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
(f
e
e
t
-
M
S
L
)
WA
T
E
R

L
E
V
E
L
BORING LOG
SA
M
P
L
E

N
O
.
SA
M
P
L
E

T
Y
P
E
BLOW COUNT/ CORE DATA
NOTES: HQ core at 18.6 feet, Water level at 24hours = 16.5 feet; cave in at 24 hours = 50.0 feet.
S&ME Project No. 7126-16-045
Harris GW Assessment
New Hill, NC
S&
M
E

B
O
R
I
N
G

L
O
G

7
1
2
6
-
1
6
-
0
4
5

H
A
R
R
I
S

G
W

A
S
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
.
G
P
J

S
&
M
E
.
G
D
T

4
/
2
1
/
1
7
8060302010
/
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA(blows/ft)
4
4
12
50/4
36
47
50/1.5
7
9
50/5
100%
100%
11
14
50/5
50/4
50/5
50/3
50/1.5
4
5
30
50/5
50/3
100%
100%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SILTY CLAY (CL)stiff, reddish brown, low plasticity, slightly moist
SILT (ML)hard, reddish brown, damp
SILT (ML)hard, dark reddish brown, damp
Rock, Siltstone - red brown weak to moderaterock strength, massive, slightly weathered, nofractures
Rock, Siltstone - red brown, weak to moderate
rock strength, massive, slightly weathered; 31.5'
fracture, 30°, open, slight oxidation
THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT PREPARED FOR THE NAMEDPROJECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT REPORT.
BORING, SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN GENERALACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D-1586.
STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT EXACT.
WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY.
1.
2.
3.
4.
PROJECT:B-2 @ MW-1
EASTING:
BORING DEPTH:61.6 ft
LOGGED BY:A. Culpepper
3r
d

6
i
n

/

R
Q
D
GR
A
P
H
I
C
LO
G
N
V
A
L
U
E
DE
P
T
H
(f
e
e
t
)
Page 1 of 3
NOTES:
2n
d

6
i
n

/

R
E
C
DATE DRILLED: 12/14/16
DRILL RIG: CME 750
DRILLER: S&ME, Ray Norwood
HAMMER TYPE: Auto
SAMPLING METHOD: Rock Core, Split spoon
DRILLING METHOD: Mud Rotary with Tri Cone 3 7/8"
5
10
15
20
25
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
NORTHING:
ELEVATION:
WATER LEVEL:19.3 feet at 48 hours
REMARKS
1s
t

6
i
n

/

R
U
N

#
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
(f
e
e
t
-
M
S
L
)
WA
T
E
R

L
E
V
E
L
BORING LOG
SA
M
P
L
E

N
O
.
SA
M
P
L
E

T
Y
P
E
BLOW COUNT/ CORE DATA
NOTES: HQ core at 23.9 feet; cave in at 48hrs =61 feet
S&ME Project No. 7126-16-045
Harris GW Assessment
New Hill, NC
S&
M
E

B
O
R
I
N
G

L
O
G

7
1
2
6
-
1
6
-
0
4
5

H
A
R
R
I
S

G
W

A
S
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
.
G
P
J

S
&
M
E
.
G
D
T

4
/
2
1
/
1
7
8060302010
/
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA(blows/ft)
100%
50%
100%
100%
92%
100%
50%
100%
100%
92%
10
11
12
13
14
Rock, Siltstone - red brown, weak to moderate
rock strength, massive, slightly weathered
Rock, Siltstone - dark red brown, moderate tostrong rock strength, massive, slightly
weathered, 41.6' fracture, low angle, open,
slight oxidation
Rock, Slitstone - dark red brown, lifter clogged
with silt, core damaged during recovery
Rock, Siltstone, dark red brown, moderate tostrong rock strength, massive, slightly
weathered; 48' fracture, low angle, open, no
oxidation
Rock, Siltstone, dark red brown, weak rock
strength, massive, moderatly weathered; 52.8
fracture, low angle open
Rock, Conglomerate - dark red brown, weak,massive, moderately weathered
THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT PREPARED FOR THE NAMEDPROJECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT REPORT.
BORING, SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN GENERALACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D-1586.
STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT EXACT.
WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY.
1.
2.
3.
4.
PROJECT:B-2 @ MW-1
EASTING:
BORING DEPTH:61.6 ft
LOGGED BY:A. Culpepper
3r
d

6
i
n

/

R
Q
D
GR
A
P
H
I
C
LO
G
N
V
A
L
U
E
DE
P
T
H
(f
e
e
t
)
Page 2 of 3
NOTES:
2n
d

6
i
n

/

R
E
C
DATE DRILLED: 12/14/16
DRILL RIG: CME 750
DRILLER: S&ME, Ray Norwood
HAMMER TYPE: Auto
SAMPLING METHOD: Rock Core, Split spoon
DRILLING METHOD: Mud Rotary with Tri Cone 3 7/8"
35
40
45
50
55
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
NORTHING:
ELEVATION:
WATER LEVEL:19.3 feet at 48 hours
REMARKS
1s
t

6
i
n

/

R
U
N

#
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
(f
e
e
t
-
M
S
L
)
WA
T
E
R

L
E
V
E
L
BORING LOG
SA
M
P
L
E

N
O
.
SA
M
P
L
E

T
Y
P
E
BLOW COUNT/ CORE DATA
NOTES: HQ core at 23.9 feet; cave in at 48hrs =61 feet
S&ME Project No. 7126-16-045
Harris GW Assessment
New Hill, NC
S&
M
E

B
O
R
I
N
G

L
O
G

7
1
2
6
-
1
6
-
0
4
5

H
A
R
R
I
S

G
W

A
S
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
.
G
P
J

S
&
M
E
.
G
D
T

4
/
2
1
/
1
7
8060302010
/
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA(blows/ft)
Rock, Siltstone - dark red brown, weak tomoderate rock strength, massive, excellent rockquality, slightly weathered, no fractures
(continued)
Boring terminated at 61.6 ft
HC
THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT PREPARED FOR THE NAMEDPROJECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT REPORT.
BORING, SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN GENERALACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D-1586.
STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT EXACT.
WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY.
1.
2.
3.
4.
PROJECT:B-2 @ MW-1
EASTING:
BORING DEPTH:61.6 ft
LOGGED BY:A. Culpepper
3r
d

6
i
n

/

R
Q
D
GR
A
P
H
I
C
LO
G
N
V
A
L
U
E
DE
P
T
H
(f
e
e
t
)
Page 3 of 3
NOTES:
2n
d

6
i
n

/

R
E
C
DATE DRILLED: 12/14/16
DRILL RIG: CME 750
DRILLER: S&ME, Ray Norwood
HAMMER TYPE: Auto
SAMPLING METHOD: Rock Core, Split spoon
DRILLING METHOD: Mud Rotary with Tri Cone 3 7/8"
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
NORTHING:
ELEVATION:
WATER LEVEL:19.3 feet at 48 hours
REMARKS
1s
t

6
i
n

/

R
U
N

#
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
(f
e
e
t
-
M
S
L
)
WA
T
E
R

L
E
V
E
L
BORING LOG
SA
M
P
L
E

N
O
.
SA
M
P
L
E

T
Y
P
E
BLOW COUNT/ CORE DATA
NOTES: HQ core at 23.9 feet; cave in at 48hrs =61 feet
S&ME Project No. 7126-16-045
Harris GW Assessment
New Hill, NC
S&
M
E

B
O
R
I
N
G

L
O
G

7
1
2
6
-
1
6
-
0
4
5

H
A
R
R
I
S

G
W

A
S
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
.
G
P
J

S
&
M
E
.
G
D
T

4
/
2
1
/
1
7
8060302010
/
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA(blows/ft)
Appendix IV – Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Field Forms
47
50
8.12 ft-TOC 2 inch
32.60 ft-TOC 4.0 Gal
24.48 feet 11.98 Gal
15 feet Stickup:2.8 ft-GRD 19.97 Gal
Start Time:10:15 End Time:
On (sec):Off (sec):Pressure:psi
ft-TOC
feet 400 mL
ft-TOC
Gallons
mL/min
(Yes/No)
Field Parameters (Taken at time intervals ≥ 5 minutes and purge volumes ≥ 1 flow-through cell volume)
Time
Volume
Purged Flow Rate
Depth to
Water Temp pH Spec. Cond.
Dissolved
Oxygen ORP*Turbidity
(gal)(mL/min)(ft)(°C)(s.u.)(µS/cm)(mg/L)(mV)(NTU)
10:15 0.0 ------------------------
10:22 0.3 165 9.12 13.7 5.5 0.160 10.6 181 22.4
10:27 0.4 95 9.25 13.8 5.4 0.151 9.3 181 25.0
10:32 0.6 140 9.53 13.8 5.2 0.137 8.3 187 35.1
10:37 0.7 50 9.56 13.7 5.1 0.134 7.8 192 34.7
10:42 0.8 60 9.64 13.6 5.1 0.133 7.5 198 36.4
10:47 0.8 60 9.74 13.6 5.1 0.132 7.0 203 42.0
10:52 0.9 60 9.78 13.6 5.1 0.132 6.9 206 38.3
10:57 1.0 60 9.80 13.6 5.1 0.132 6.8 208 38.8
11:02 1.1 60 9.83 13.6 5.0 0.132 6.7 211 34.6
Final:11:02 1.1 60 9.83 13.6 5.0 0.132 6.7 211 34.6
Sample Method:11:05 11:45
Qty Container Qty Container
3 40mL VOAs
1 500mL A
1 250mL P
Name Signature Date
(1)
(2)
Notes:
Form Revision Date:
Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Field Form
Project Name:Shearon Harris Landfill Purge Date:March 20, 2017
Source Well:MW-8 Sample Time:11:05
Locked?:Yes Weather:clear
Project Location:New Hill, NC Purge Time:Minutes
Project Number:7126-16-045 Sample Date:March 20, 2017
Sampled By:Bob Bryant, Lyndal Butler Air Temp:° F
Flow Through Cell Serial No.:13H100507 Pump Serial No.:7694 Calibration Date:March 20, 2017
Total Well Depth:Water Volume
Water Level & Well Data
Measuring Point:Top of Casing Well Volume
Height of Water Column:3 * Well Volume
Screen Length:5 * Well Volume
Well Purging Information
Depth to Water:Well Diameter
Purge Method:Submersible Pump 11:02
(If Used)Bladder Pump Control Settings:
Pump Intake Depth from Top of Casing:27.0
Water Column Above Pump Intake:18.88 Flow Through Cell Vol:
DTW-TOC at 25% Drawdown of WC Above Pump:12.84 Comments:
Comment
Final Volume Purged:1.1 YSI 556
Final Volume Purge Rate:60
Well Purged Dry?:No
Start Purging
slowed flow
slowed flow
End of Purging
Submersible Pump Sample Start Time:Sample End Time:
Analytical Data
Method Preservative Method Preservative
Metals 6010 (Total)HNO3
VOCs 8260 HCl
Sulfate 300.0 Unpreserved
Duplicate collected at MW-8.
2/28/17 16:40
52
13.08 ft-TOC 2 inch
44.00 ft-TOC 5.0 Gal
30.92 feet 15.14 Gal
15 feet Stickup:3.1 ft-GRD 25.23 Gal
Start Time:12:23 End Time:
On (sec):Off (sec):Pressure:psi
ft-TOC
feet 200 mL
ft-TOC
Gallons
mL/min
(Yes/No)
Field Parameters (Taken at time intervals ≥ 5 minutes and purge volumes ≥ 1 flow-through cell volume)
Time
Volume
Purged Flow Rate
Depth to
Water Temp pH Spec. Cond.
Dissolved
Oxygen ORP*Turbidity
(gal)(mL/min)(ft)(°C)(s.u.)(µS/cm)(mg/L)(mV)(NTU)
12:23 0.0 ------------------------
12:30 0.5 260 13.74 16.5 7.1 0.467 9.5 94 7.30
12:35 0.7 180 14.64 16.3 7.4 0.472 7.1 94 39.5
12:40 0.8 60 14.85 16.5 7.5 0.475 6.0 90 45.5
12:45 0.9 60 15.07 16.8 7.6 0.476 5.5 86 45.8
12:50 0.9 40 15.27 16.8 7.6 0.476 5.3 84 45.3
12:55 1.0 50 15.47 16.7 7.7 0.477 5.1 83 43.4
13:00 1.1 50 15.68 16.7 7.7 0.476 4.9 82 35.9
13:05 1.1 50 15.83 16.8 7.7 0.477 4.7 82 35.7
13:10 1.2 50 15.98 17.0 7.7 0.476 4.6 81 28.6
13:15 1.3 50 16.17 17.1 7.7 0.477 4.4 80 26.2
Final:13:15 1.3 50 16.17 17.1 7.7 0.477 4.4 80 26.2
Sample Method:13:20 13:43
Qty Container Qty Container
3 40mL VOAs
1 500mL A
1 250mL P
Name Signature Date
(1)
(2)
Notes:
Form Revision Date:2/28/17 16:40
Sulfate 300.0 Unpreserved
VOCs 8260 HCl
Method Preservative Method Preservative
Metals 6010 (Total)HNO3
Submersible Pump Sample Start Time:Sample End Time:
Analytical Data
End of Purging
slowed flow
slowed flow
Start Purging
Comment
Final Volume Purged:1.3 YSI 556
Final Volume Purge Rate:50
Well Purged Dry?:
Water Column Above Pump Intake:25.42 Flow Through Cell Vol:
DTW-TOC at 25% Drawdown of WC Above Pump:19.44 Comments:
Well Purging Information
Depth to Water:Well Diameter
Purge Method:Submersible Pump 13:15
(If Used)Bladder Pump Control Settings:
Pump Intake Depth from Top of Casing:38.5
Total Well Depth:Water Volume
Water Level & Well Data
Measuring Point:Top of Casing Well Volume
Height of Water Column:3 * Well Volume
Screen Length:5 * Well Volume
Sampled By:Bob Bryant, Lyndal Butler Air Temp:° F
Flow Through Cell Serial No.:13H100507 Pump Serial No.:7694 Calibration Date:March 20, 2017
Locked?:Yes Weather:clear
Project Location:New Hill, NC Purge Time:Minutes
Project Number:7126-16-045 Sample Date:March 20, 2017
Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Field Form
Project Name:Shearon Harris Landfill Purge Date:March 20, 2017
Source Well:MW-9 Sample Time:13:20
Appendix V – Laboratory Analytical Report
#=CL#
March 28, 2017
LIMS USE: FR - PROGRAM MANAGER
LIMS OBJECT ID: 92334202
92334202
Project:
Pace Project No.:
RE:
Program Manager
Duke Energy
13339 Hagers Ferry Road
Bldg. 7405 MG30A2
Huntersville, NC 28078
J17030057
Dear Program Manager:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on March 21, 2017. The
results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the most
current, applicable TNI/NELAC standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where
applicable, unless otherwise noted in the body of the report.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kevin Herring
[e-mail]
HORIZON Database Administrator
1(704)875-9092
Enclosures
cc:Della Allen
Gerald Boley
H-Gordon Cladwell
James Eayres
Amanda Hair
Baxter Heather
Jeremy Keltner
Program Manager, Duke Energy
Brice Peters
Eric Scott
Bob Wilson
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 1 of 30
#=CP#
CERTIFICATIONS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Charlotte Certification IDs
9800 Kincey Ave. Ste 100, Huntersville, NC 28078
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37706
North Carolina Field Services Certification #: 5342
North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 12
South Carolina Certification #: 99006001
Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87627
Kentucky UST Certification #: 84
Virginia/VELAP Certification #: 460221
Asheville Certification IDs
2225 Riverside Drive, Asheville, NC 28804
Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87648
Massachusetts Certification #: M-NC030
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37712
North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 40
South Carolina Certification #: 99030001
Virginia/VELAP Certification #: 460222
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 2 of 30
#=SS#
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Lab ID Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received
92334202001 2017006986 Water 03/20/17 11:05 03/21/17 11:08
92334202002 2017006987 Water 03/20/17 13:20 03/21/17 11:08
92334202003 2017006988 Water 03/20/17 00:00 03/21/17 11:08
92334202004 2017006989 Water 03/20/17 11:50 03/21/17 11:08
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 3 of 30
#=SA#
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Lab ID Sample ID Method
Analytes
Reported LaboratoryAnalysts
92334202001 2017006986 EPA 6010 7 PASI-ASER
EPA 7470 1 PASI-AWAB
EPA 8260 52 PASI-CZDO
EPA 300.0 1 PASI-AAES2
92334202002 2017006987 EPA 6010 7 PASI-ASER
EPA 7470 1 PASI-AWAB
EPA 8260 52 PASI-CZDO
EPA 300.0 1 PASI-AAES2
92334202003 2017006988 EPA 6010 7 PASI-ASER
EPA 7470 1 PASI-AWAB
EPA 8260 52 PASI-CZDO
EPA 300.0 1 PASI-AAES2
92334202004 2017006989 EPA 6010 7 PASI-ASER
EPA 7470 1 PASI-AWAB
EPA 8260 52 PASI-CZDO
EPA 300.0 1 PASI-AAES2
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 4 of 30
#=HO#
SUMMARY OF DETECTION
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Parameters AnalyzedResult
Lab Sample ID
Report Limit QualifiersUnitsMethod
Client Sample ID
92334202001 2017006986
Barium 110 ug/L 03/28/17 06:105.0EPA 6010
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.25J ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 B1.0EPA 8260
Tetrachloroethene 0.49J ug/L 03/23/17 10:131.0EPA 8260
Sulfate 7.9 mg/L 03/23/17 12:091.0EPA 300.0
92334202002 2017006987
Barium 231 ug/L 03/28/17 06:135.0EPA 6010
Chloromethane 0.34J ug/L 03/23/17 10:311.0EPA 8260
1,1-Dichloroethane 1.3 ug/L 03/23/17 10:311.0EPA 8260
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.31J ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 B1.0EPA 8260
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.4 ug/L 03/23/17 10:311.0EPA 8260
Sulfate 9.4 mg/L 03/23/17 12:091.0EPA 300.0
92334202003 2017006988
Barium 110 ug/L 03/28/17 06:165.0EPA 6010
Chromium 9.5 ug/L 03/28/17 06:165.0EPA 6010
Chloromethane 0.17J ug/L 03/23/17 11:051.0EPA 8260
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.25J ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 B1.0EPA 8260
Sulfate 7.9 mg/L 03/23/17 12:091.0EPA 300.0
92334202004 2017006989
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.30J ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 B1.0EPA 8260
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 5 of 30
#=NA#
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Method:
Client:Duke Energy
EPA 6010
Date:March 28, 2017
Description:6010 MET ICP
General Information:
4 samples were analyzed for EPA 6010. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the
chain-of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form (SCUR) attached at the end of this report.
Hold Time:
The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below.
Sample Preparation:
The samples were prepared in accordance with EPA 3010A with any exceptions noted below.
Initial Calibrations (including MS Tune as applicable):
All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below.
Continuing Calibration:
All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below.
Method Blank:
All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank, where applicable, with any exceptions noted below.
Laboratory Control Spike:
All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Matrix Spikes:
All percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
Additional Comments:
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 6 of 30
#=NA#
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Method:
Client:Duke Energy
EPA 7470
Date:March 28, 2017
Description:7470 Mercury
General Information:
4 samples were analyzed for EPA 7470. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the
chain-of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form (SCUR) attached at the end of this report.
Hold Time:
The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below.
Sample Preparation:
The samples were prepared in accordance with EPA 7470 with any exceptions noted below.
Initial Calibrations (including MS Tune as applicable):
All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below.
Continuing Calibration:
All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below.
Method Blank:
All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank, where applicable, with any exceptions noted below.
Laboratory Control Spike:
All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Matrix Spikes:
All percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
Additional Comments:
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 7 of 30
#=NA#
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Method:
Client:Duke Energy
EPA 8260
Date:March 28, 2017
Description:8260 MSV Low Level Landfill
General Information:
4 samples were analyzed for EPA 8260. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the
chain-of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form (SCUR) attached at the end of this report.
Hold Time:
The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below.
Initial Calibrations (including MS Tune as applicable):
All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below.
Continuing Calibration:
All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below.
Internal Standards:
All internal standards were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Surrogates:
All surrogates were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Method Blank:
All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank, where applicable, with any exceptions noted below.
QC Batch: 353415
B: Analyte was detected in the associated method blank.
• BLANK for HBN 353415 [MSV/4069 (Lab ID: 1960244)
• 1,2-Dichloroethane
Laboratory Control Spike:
All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Matrix Spikes:
All percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
QC Batch: 353415
A matrix spike and/or matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) were performed on the following sample(s): 92334202001
M1: Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery.
• MS (Lab ID: 1960246)
• Vinyl chloride
Duplicate Sample:
All duplicate sample results were within method acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
Additional Comments:
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 8 of 30
#=NA#
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Method:
Client:Duke Energy
EPA 300.0
Date:March 28, 2017
Description:300.0 IC Anions 28 Days, LL
General Information:
4 samples were analyzed for EPA 300.0. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the
chain-of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form (SCUR) attached at the end of this report.
Hold Time:
The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below.
Method Blank:
All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank, where applicable, with any exceptions noted below.
Laboratory Control Spike:
All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Matrix Spikes:
All percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
Additional Comments:
This data package has been reviewed for quality and completeness and is approved for release.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 9 of 30
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Sample:2017006986 Lab ID:92334202001 Collected:03/20/17 11:05 Received:03/21/17 11:08 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010A6010 MET ICP
Arsenic <5.0 ug/L 03/28/17 06:10 7440-38-203/22/17 19:4510.0 5.0 1
Barium 110 ug/L 03/28/17 06:10 7440-39-303/22/17 19:455.0 2.5 1
Cadmium <0.50 ug/L 03/28/17 06:10 7440-43-903/22/17 19:451.0 0.50 1
Chromium <2.5 ug/L 03/28/17 06:10 7440-47-303/22/17 19:455.0 2.5 1
Lead <2.5 ug/L 03/28/17 06:10 7439-92-103/22/17 19:455.0 2.5 1
Selenium <5.0 ug/L 03/28/17 06:10 7782-49-203/22/17 19:4510.0 5.0 1
Silver <2.5 ug/L 03/28/17 06:10 7440-22-403/22/17 19:455.0 2.5 1
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 74707470 Mercury
Mercury <0.10 ug/L 03/27/17 13:05 7439-97-603/27/17 10:150.20 0.10 1
Analytical Method: EPA 82608260 MSV Low Level Landfill
Acetone <10.0 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 67-64-125.0 10.0 1
Acrylonitrile <1.9 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 107-13-110.0 1.9 1
Benzene <0.25 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 71-43-21.0 0.25 1
Bromochloromethane <0.17 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 74-97-51.0 0.17 1
Bromodichloromethane <0.18 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 75-27-41.0 0.18 1
Bromoform <0.26 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 75-25-21.0 0.26 1
Bromomethane <0.29 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 74-83-92.0 0.29 1
2-Butanone (MEK)<0.96 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 78-93-35.0 0.96 1
Carbon disulfide <1.2 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 75-15-02.0 1.2 1
Carbon tetrachloride <0.25 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 56-23-51.0 0.25 1
Chlorobenzene <0.23 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 108-90-71.0 0.23 1
Chloroethane <0.54 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 75-00-31.0 0.54 1
Chloroform <0.14 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 67-66-31.0 0.14 1
Chloromethane <0.11 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 74-87-31.0 0.11 1
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2.0 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 96-12-82.0 2.0 1
Dibromochloromethane <0.21 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 124-48-11.0 0.21 1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.27 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 106-93-41.0 0.27 1
Dibromomethane <0.21 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 74-95-31.0 0.21 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.30 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 95-50-11.0 0.30 1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.33 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 106-46-71.0 0.33 1
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene <1.0 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 110-57-61.0 1.0 1
1,1-Dichloroethane <0.32 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 75-34-31.0 0.32 1
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.25J ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 107-06-2 B1.0 0.24 1
1,1-Dichloroethene <0.56 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 75-35-41.0 0.56 1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.19 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 156-59-21.0 0.19 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.49 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 156-60-51.0 0.49 1
1,2-Dichloropropane <0.27 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 78-87-51.0 0.27 1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.13 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 10061-01-51.0 0.13 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.26 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 10061-02-61.0 0.26 1
Ethylbenzene <0.30 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 100-41-41.0 0.30 1
2-Hexanone <0.46 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 591-78-65.0 0.46 1
Iodomethane <0.32 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 74-88-45.0 0.32 1
Methylene Chloride <0.97 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 75-09-21.0 0.97 1
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)<0.33 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 108-10-15.0 0.33 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 03/28/2017 03:58 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 10 of 30
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Sample:2017006986 Lab ID:92334202001 Collected:03/20/17 11:05 Received:03/21/17 11:08 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL
Analytical Method: EPA 82608260 MSV Low Level Landfill
Styrene <0.26 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 100-42-51.0 0.26 1
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.33 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 630-20-61.0 0.33 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.40 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 79-34-51.0 0.40 1
Tetrachloroethene 0.49J ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 127-18-41.0 0.46 1
Toluene <0.26 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 108-88-31.0 0.26 1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.48 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 71-55-61.0 0.48 1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.29 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 79-00-51.0 0.29 1
Trichloroethene <0.47 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 79-01-61.0 0.47 1
Trichlorofluoromethane <0.20 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 75-69-41.0 0.20 1
1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.41 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 96-18-41.0 0.41 1
Vinyl acetate <0.35 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 108-05-42.0 0.35 1
Vinyl chloride <0.62 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 75-01-4 M11.0 0.62 1
Xylene (Total)<0.66 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 1330-20-71.0 0.66 1
m&p-Xylene <0.66 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 179601-23-12.0 0.66 1
o-Xylene <0.23 ug/L 03/23/17 10:13 95-47-61.0 0.23 1
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)100 %03/23/17 10:13 460-00-470-130 1
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)92 %03/23/17 10:13 17060-07-070-130 1
Toluene-d8 (S)101 %03/23/17 10:13 2037-26-570-130 1
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0300.0 IC Anions 28 Days, LL
Sulfate 7.9 mg/L 03/23/17 12:09 14808-79-81.0 0.50 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 03/28/2017 03:58 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 11 of 30
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Sample:2017006987 Lab ID:92334202002 Collected:03/20/17 13:20 Received:03/21/17 11:08 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010A6010 MET ICP
Arsenic <5.0 ug/L 03/28/17 06:13 7440-38-203/22/17 19:4510.0 5.0 1
Barium 231 ug/L 03/28/17 06:13 7440-39-303/22/17 19:455.0 2.5 1
Cadmium <0.50 ug/L 03/28/17 06:13 7440-43-903/22/17 19:451.0 0.50 1
Chromium <2.5 ug/L 03/28/17 06:13 7440-47-303/22/17 19:455.0 2.5 1
Lead <2.5 ug/L 03/28/17 06:13 7439-92-103/22/17 19:455.0 2.5 1
Selenium <5.0 ug/L 03/28/17 06:13 7782-49-203/22/17 19:4510.0 5.0 1
Silver <2.5 ug/L 03/28/17 06:13 7440-22-403/22/17 19:455.0 2.5 1
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 74707470 Mercury
Mercury <0.10 ug/L 03/27/17 13:07 7439-97-603/27/17 10:150.20 0.10 1
Analytical Method: EPA 82608260 MSV Low Level Landfill
Acetone <10.0 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 67-64-125.0 10.0 1
Acrylonitrile <1.9 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 107-13-110.0 1.9 1
Benzene <0.25 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 71-43-21.0 0.25 1
Bromochloromethane <0.17 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 74-97-51.0 0.17 1
Bromodichloromethane <0.18 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 75-27-41.0 0.18 1
Bromoform <0.26 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 75-25-21.0 0.26 1
Bromomethane <0.29 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 74-83-92.0 0.29 1
2-Butanone (MEK)<0.96 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 78-93-35.0 0.96 1
Carbon disulfide <1.2 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 75-15-02.0 1.2 1
Carbon tetrachloride <0.25 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 56-23-51.0 0.25 1
Chlorobenzene <0.23 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 108-90-71.0 0.23 1
Chloroethane <0.54 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 75-00-31.0 0.54 1
Chloroform <0.14 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 67-66-31.0 0.14 1
Chloromethane 0.34J ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 74-87-31.0 0.11 1
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2.0 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 96-12-82.0 2.0 1
Dibromochloromethane <0.21 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 124-48-11.0 0.21 1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.27 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 106-93-41.0 0.27 1
Dibromomethane <0.21 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 74-95-31.0 0.21 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.30 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 95-50-11.0 0.30 1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.33 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 106-46-71.0 0.33 1
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene <1.0 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 110-57-61.0 1.0 1
1,1-Dichloroethane 1.3 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 75-34-31.0 0.32 1
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.31J ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 107-06-2 B1.0 0.24 1
1,1-Dichloroethene <0.56 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 75-35-41.0 0.56 1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.4 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 156-59-21.0 0.19 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.49 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 156-60-51.0 0.49 1
1,2-Dichloropropane <0.27 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 78-87-51.0 0.27 1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.13 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 10061-01-51.0 0.13 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.26 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 10061-02-61.0 0.26 1
Ethylbenzene <0.30 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 100-41-41.0 0.30 1
2-Hexanone <0.46 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 591-78-65.0 0.46 1
Iodomethane <0.32 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 74-88-45.0 0.32 1
Methylene Chloride <0.97 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 75-09-21.0 0.97 1
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)<0.33 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 108-10-15.0 0.33 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 03/28/2017 03:58 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 12 of 30
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Sample:2017006987 Lab ID:92334202002 Collected:03/20/17 13:20 Received:03/21/17 11:08 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL
Analytical Method: EPA 82608260 MSV Low Level Landfill
Styrene <0.26 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 100-42-51.0 0.26 1
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.33 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 630-20-61.0 0.33 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.40 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 79-34-51.0 0.40 1
Tetrachloroethene <0.46 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 127-18-41.0 0.46 1
Toluene <0.26 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 108-88-31.0 0.26 1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.48 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 71-55-61.0 0.48 1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.29 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 79-00-51.0 0.29 1
Trichloroethene <0.47 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 79-01-61.0 0.47 1
Trichlorofluoromethane <0.20 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 75-69-41.0 0.20 1
1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.41 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 96-18-41.0 0.41 1
Vinyl acetate <0.35 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 108-05-42.0 0.35 1
Vinyl chloride <0.62 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 75-01-41.0 0.62 1
Xylene (Total)<0.66 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 1330-20-71.0 0.66 1
m&p-Xylene <0.66 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 179601-23-12.0 0.66 1
o-Xylene <0.23 ug/L 03/23/17 10:31 95-47-61.0 0.23 1
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)98 %03/23/17 10:31 460-00-470-130 1
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)90 %03/23/17 10:31 17060-07-070-130 1
Toluene-d8 (S)100 %03/23/17 10:31 2037-26-570-130 1
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0300.0 IC Anions 28 Days, LL
Sulfate 9.4 mg/L 03/23/17 12:09 14808-79-81.0 0.50 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 03/28/2017 03:58 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 13 of 30
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Sample:2017006988 Lab ID:92334202003 Collected:03/20/17 00:00 Received:03/21/17 11:08 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010A6010 MET ICP
Arsenic <5.0 ug/L 03/28/17 06:16 7440-38-203/22/17 19:4510.0 5.0 1
Barium 110 ug/L 03/28/17 06:16 7440-39-303/22/17 19:455.0 2.5 1
Cadmium <0.50 ug/L 03/28/17 06:16 7440-43-903/22/17 19:451.0 0.50 1
Chromium 9.5 ug/L 03/28/17 06:16 7440-47-303/22/17 19:455.0 2.5 1
Lead <2.5 ug/L 03/28/17 06:16 7439-92-103/22/17 19:455.0 2.5 1
Selenium <5.0 ug/L 03/28/17 06:16 7782-49-203/22/17 19:4510.0 5.0 1
Silver <2.5 ug/L 03/28/17 06:16 7440-22-403/22/17 19:455.0 2.5 1
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 74707470 Mercury
Mercury <0.10 ug/L 03/27/17 13:10 7439-97-603/27/17 10:150.20 0.10 1
Analytical Method: EPA 82608260 MSV Low Level Landfill
Acetone <10.0 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 67-64-125.0 10.0 1
Acrylonitrile <1.9 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 107-13-110.0 1.9 1
Benzene <0.25 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 71-43-21.0 0.25 1
Bromochloromethane <0.17 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 74-97-51.0 0.17 1
Bromodichloromethane <0.18 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 75-27-41.0 0.18 1
Bromoform <0.26 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 75-25-21.0 0.26 1
Bromomethane <0.29 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 74-83-92.0 0.29 1
2-Butanone (MEK)<0.96 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 78-93-35.0 0.96 1
Carbon disulfide <1.2 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 75-15-02.0 1.2 1
Carbon tetrachloride <0.25 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 56-23-51.0 0.25 1
Chlorobenzene <0.23 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 108-90-71.0 0.23 1
Chloroethane <0.54 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 75-00-31.0 0.54 1
Chloroform <0.14 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 67-66-31.0 0.14 1
Chloromethane 0.17J ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 74-87-31.0 0.11 1
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2.0 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 96-12-82.0 2.0 1
Dibromochloromethane <0.21 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 124-48-11.0 0.21 1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.27 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 106-93-41.0 0.27 1
Dibromomethane <0.21 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 74-95-31.0 0.21 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.30 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 95-50-11.0 0.30 1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.33 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 106-46-71.0 0.33 1
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene <1.0 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 110-57-61.0 1.0 1
1,1-Dichloroethane <0.32 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 75-34-31.0 0.32 1
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.25J ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 107-06-2 B1.0 0.24 1
1,1-Dichloroethene <0.56 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 75-35-41.0 0.56 1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.19 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 156-59-21.0 0.19 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.49 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 156-60-51.0 0.49 1
1,2-Dichloropropane <0.27 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 78-87-51.0 0.27 1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.13 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 10061-01-51.0 0.13 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.26 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 10061-02-61.0 0.26 1
Ethylbenzene <0.30 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 100-41-41.0 0.30 1
2-Hexanone <0.46 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 591-78-65.0 0.46 1
Iodomethane <0.32 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 74-88-45.0 0.32 1
Methylene Chloride <0.97 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 75-09-21.0 0.97 1
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)<0.33 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 108-10-15.0 0.33 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 03/28/2017 03:58 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 14 of 30
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Sample:2017006988 Lab ID:92334202003 Collected:03/20/17 00:00 Received:03/21/17 11:08 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL
Analytical Method: EPA 82608260 MSV Low Level Landfill
Styrene <0.26 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 100-42-51.0 0.26 1
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.33 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 630-20-61.0 0.33 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.40 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 79-34-51.0 0.40 1
Tetrachloroethene <0.46 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 127-18-41.0 0.46 1
Toluene <0.26 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 108-88-31.0 0.26 1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.48 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 71-55-61.0 0.48 1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.29 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 79-00-51.0 0.29 1
Trichloroethene <0.47 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 79-01-61.0 0.47 1
Trichlorofluoromethane <0.20 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 75-69-41.0 0.20 1
1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.41 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 96-18-41.0 0.41 1
Vinyl acetate <0.35 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 108-05-42.0 0.35 1
Vinyl chloride <0.62 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 75-01-41.0 0.62 1
Xylene (Total)<0.66 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 1330-20-71.0 0.66 1
m&p-Xylene <0.66 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 179601-23-12.0 0.66 1
o-Xylene <0.23 ug/L 03/23/17 11:05 95-47-61.0 0.23 1
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)98 %03/23/17 11:05 460-00-470-130 1
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)92 %03/23/17 11:05 17060-07-070-130 1
Toluene-d8 (S)101 %03/23/17 11:05 2037-26-570-130 1
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0300.0 IC Anions 28 Days, LL
Sulfate 7.9 mg/L 03/23/17 12:09 14808-79-81.0 0.50 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 03/28/2017 03:58 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 15 of 30
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Sample:2017006989 Lab ID:92334202004 Collected:03/20/17 11:50 Received:03/21/17 11:08 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010A6010 MET ICP
Arsenic <5.0 ug/L 03/28/17 06:20 7440-38-203/22/17 19:4510.0 5.0 1
Barium <2.5 ug/L 03/28/17 06:20 7440-39-303/22/17 19:455.0 2.5 1
Cadmium <0.50 ug/L 03/28/17 06:20 7440-43-903/22/17 19:451.0 0.50 1
Chromium <2.5 ug/L 03/28/17 06:20 7440-47-303/22/17 19:455.0 2.5 1
Lead <2.5 ug/L 03/28/17 06:20 7439-92-103/22/17 19:455.0 2.5 1
Selenium <5.0 ug/L 03/28/17 06:20 7782-49-203/22/17 19:4510.0 5.0 1
Silver <2.5 ug/L 03/28/17 06:20 7440-22-403/22/17 19:455.0 2.5 1
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 74707470 Mercury
Mercury <0.10 ug/L 03/27/17 13:12 7439-97-603/27/17 10:150.20 0.10 1
Analytical Method: EPA 82608260 MSV Low Level Landfill
Acetone <10.0 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 67-64-125.0 10.0 1
Acrylonitrile <1.9 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 107-13-110.0 1.9 1
Benzene <0.25 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 71-43-21.0 0.25 1
Bromochloromethane <0.17 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 74-97-51.0 0.17 1
Bromodichloromethane <0.18 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 75-27-41.0 0.18 1
Bromoform <0.26 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 75-25-21.0 0.26 1
Bromomethane <0.29 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 74-83-92.0 0.29 1
2-Butanone (MEK)<0.96 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 78-93-35.0 0.96 1
Carbon disulfide <1.2 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 75-15-02.0 1.2 1
Carbon tetrachloride <0.25 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 56-23-51.0 0.25 1
Chlorobenzene <0.23 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 108-90-71.0 0.23 1
Chloroethane <0.54 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 75-00-31.0 0.54 1
Chloroform <0.14 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 67-66-31.0 0.14 1
Chloromethane <0.11 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 74-87-31.0 0.11 1
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2.0 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 96-12-82.0 2.0 1
Dibromochloromethane <0.21 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 124-48-11.0 0.21 1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.27 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 106-93-41.0 0.27 1
Dibromomethane <0.21 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 74-95-31.0 0.21 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.30 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 95-50-11.0 0.30 1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.33 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 106-46-71.0 0.33 1
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene <1.0 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 110-57-61.0 1.0 1
1,1-Dichloroethane <0.32 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 75-34-31.0 0.32 1
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.30J ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 107-06-2 B1.0 0.24 1
1,1-Dichloroethene <0.56 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 75-35-41.0 0.56 1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.19 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 156-59-21.0 0.19 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.49 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 156-60-51.0 0.49 1
1,2-Dichloropropane <0.27 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 78-87-51.0 0.27 1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.13 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 10061-01-51.0 0.13 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.26 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 10061-02-61.0 0.26 1
Ethylbenzene <0.30 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 100-41-41.0 0.30 1
2-Hexanone <0.46 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 591-78-65.0 0.46 1
Iodomethane <0.32 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 74-88-45.0 0.32 1
Methylene Chloride <0.97 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 75-09-21.0 0.97 1
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)<0.33 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 108-10-15.0 0.33 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 03/28/2017 03:58 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 16 of 30
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Sample:2017006989 Lab ID:92334202004 Collected:03/20/17 11:50 Received:03/21/17 11:08 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL
Analytical Method: EPA 82608260 MSV Low Level Landfill
Styrene <0.26 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 100-42-51.0 0.26 1
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.33 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 630-20-61.0 0.33 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.40 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 79-34-51.0 0.40 1
Tetrachloroethene <0.46 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 127-18-41.0 0.46 1
Toluene <0.26 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 108-88-31.0 0.26 1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.48 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 71-55-61.0 0.48 1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.29 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 79-00-51.0 0.29 1
Trichloroethene <0.47 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 79-01-61.0 0.47 1
Trichlorofluoromethane <0.20 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 75-69-41.0 0.20 1
1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.41 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 96-18-41.0 0.41 1
Vinyl acetate <0.35 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 108-05-42.0 0.35 1
Vinyl chloride <0.62 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 75-01-41.0 0.62 1
Xylene (Total)<0.66 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 1330-20-71.0 0.66 1
m&p-Xylene <0.66 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 179601-23-12.0 0.66 1
o-Xylene <0.23 ug/L 03/23/17 11:23 95-47-61.0 0.23 1
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)99 %03/23/17 11:23 460-00-470-130 1
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)91 %03/23/17 11:23 17060-07-070-130 1
Toluene-d8 (S)102 %03/23/17 11:23 2037-26-570-130 1
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0300.0 IC Anions 28 Days, LL
Sulfate <0.50 mg/L 03/23/17 12:09 14808-79-81.0 0.50 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 03/28/2017 03:58 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 17 of 30
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
353482
EPA 7470
EPA 7470
7470 Mercury
Associated Lab Samples:92334202001, 92334202002, 92334202003, 92334202004
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK:1960713
Associated Lab Samples:92334202001, 92334202002, 92334202003, 92334202004
Matrix:Water
AnalyzedMDL
Mercury ug/L <0.10 0.20 03/27/17 12:440.10
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1960714LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
Mercury ug/L 2.72.5 107 80-120
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qual% RecConc.
1960715MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
MSSpike
Result
92333024015
1960716
MSD
Result
MSD
% Rec RPD RPD
Max
MSDMS
Spike
Conc.
Mercury ug/L 2.5 100 75-12594 6 252.5ND 2.6 2.4
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 03/28/2017 03:58 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 18 of 30
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
353165
EPA 3010A
EPA 6010
6010 MET
Associated Lab Samples:92334202001, 92334202002, 92334202003, 92334202004
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK:1959042
Associated Lab Samples:92334202001, 92334202002, 92334202003, 92334202004
Matrix:Water
AnalyzedMDL
Arsenic ug/L <5.0 10.0 03/26/17 05:115.0
Barium ug/L <2.5 5.0 03/26/17 05:112.5
Cadmium ug/L <0.50 1.0 03/26/17 05:110.50
Chromium ug/L <2.5 5.0 03/26/17 05:112.5
Lead ug/L <2.5 5.0 03/26/17 05:112.5
Selenium ug/L <5.0 10.0 03/26/17 05:115.0
Silver ug/L <2.5 5.0 03/26/17 05:112.5
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1959043LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
Arsenic ug/L 441500 88 80-120
Barium ug/L 515500 103 80-120
Cadmium ug/L 473500 95 80-120
Chromium ug/L 481500 96 80-120
Lead ug/L 458500 92 80-120
Selenium ug/L 462500 92 80-120
Silver ug/L 242250 97 80-120
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qual% RecConc.
1959044MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
MSSpike
Result
92334068001
1959045
MSD
Result
MSD
% Rec RPD RPD
Max
MSDMS
Spike
Conc.
Arsenic ug/L 500 93 75-12592 1 20500ND466462
Barium ug/L 500 104 75-125104 0 2050038.1 557 559
Cadmium ug/L 500 97 75-12596 1 20500ND484481
Chromium ug/L 500 93 75-12593 0 205006.7 474 473
Lead ug/L 500 86 75-12585 1 20500ND432428
Selenium ug/L 500 97 75-12596 1 20500ND484480
Silver ug/L 250 97 75-12597 0 20250ND247246
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 03/28/2017 03:58 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 19 of 30
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
353415
EPA 8260
EPA 8260
8260 MSV Low Level Landfill
Associated Lab Samples:92334202001, 92334202002, 92334202003, 92334202004
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK:1960244
Associated Lab Samples:92334202001, 92334202002, 92334202003, 92334202004
Matrix:Water
AnalyzedMDL
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L <0.33 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.33
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L <0.48 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.48
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L <0.40 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.40
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L <0.29 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.29
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L <0.32 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.32
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/L <0.56 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.56
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/L <0.41 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.41
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L <2.0 2.0 03/23/17 03:322.0
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/L <0.27 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.27
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L <0.30 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.30
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L 0.27J 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.24
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L <0.27 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.27
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L <0.33 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.33
2-Butanone (MEK)ug/L <0.96 5.0 03/23/17 03:320.96
2-Hexanone ug/L <0.46 5.0 03/23/17 03:320.46
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ug/L <0.33 5.0 03/23/17 03:320.33
Acetone ug/L <10.0 25.0 03/23/17 03:3210.0
Acrylonitrile ug/L <1.9 10.0 03/23/17 03:321.9
Benzene ug/L <0.25 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.25
Bromochloromethane ug/L <0.17 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.17
Bromodichloromethane ug/L <0.18 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.18
Bromoform ug/L <0.26 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.26
Bromomethane ug/L <0.29 2.0 03/23/17 03:320.29
Carbon disulfide ug/L <1.2 2.0 03/23/17 03:321.2
Carbon tetrachloride ug/L <0.25 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.25
Chlorobenzene ug/L <0.23 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.23
Chloroethane ug/L <0.54 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.54
Chloroform ug/L <0.14 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.14
Chloromethane ug/L <0.11 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.11
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L <0.19 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.19
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L <0.13 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.13
Dibromochloromethane ug/L <0.21 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.21
Dibromomethane ug/L <0.21 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.21
Ethylbenzene ug/L <0.30 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.30
Iodomethane ug/L <0.32 5.0 03/23/17 03:320.32
m&p-Xylene ug/L <0.66 2.0 03/23/17 03:320.66
Methylene Chloride ug/L <0.97 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.97
o-Xylene ug/L <0.23 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.23
Styrene ug/L <0.26 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.26
Tetrachloroethene ug/L <0.46 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.46
Toluene ug/L <0.26 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.26
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 03/28/2017 03:58 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 20 of 30
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK:1960244
Associated Lab Samples:92334202001, 92334202002, 92334202003, 92334202004
Matrix:Water
AnalyzedMDL
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L <0.49 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.49
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L <0.26 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.26
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene ug/L <1.0 1.0 03/23/17 03:321.0
Trichloroethene ug/L <0.47 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.47
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L <0.20 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.20
Vinyl acetate ug/L <0.35 2.0 03/23/17 03:320.35
Vinyl chloride ug/L <0.62 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.62
Xylene (Total)ug/L <0.66 1.0 03/23/17 03:320.66
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)%90 70-130 03/23/17 03:32
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%98 70-130 03/23/17 03:32
Toluene-d8 (S)%101 70-130 03/23/17 03:32
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1960245LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 49.750 99 80-125
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L 48.150 96 71-129
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 53.850 108 79-124
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L 52.250 104 85-125
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L 45.450 91 73-126
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/L 48.050 96 66-135
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/L 54.150 108 75-130
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L 51.650 103 71-133
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/L 55.050 110 83-124
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 53.950 108 80-133
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L 45.150 90 67-128
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 51.850 104 75-132
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 51.950 104 78-130
2-Butanone (MEK)ug/L 103100 103 61-144
2-Hexanone ug/L 112100 112 68-143
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ug/L 104100 104 72-135
Acetone ug/L 110100 110 48-146
Acrylonitrile ug/L 259250 104 40-160
Benzene ug/L 51.850 104 80-125
Bromochloromethane ug/L 47.250 94 71-125
Bromodichloromethane ug/L 54.950 110 78-124
Bromoform ug/L 45.650 91 71-128
Bromomethane ug/L 56.350 113 40-160
Carbon disulfide ug/L 41.350 83 50-160
Carbon tetrachloride ug/L 51.950 104 69-131
Chlorobenzene ug/L 53.950 108 81-122
Chloroethane ug/L 41.450 83 39-148
Chloroform ug/L 45.350 91 73-127
Chloromethane ug/L 52.150 104 44-146
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 03/28/2017 03:58 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 21 of 30
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1960245LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 45.450 91 74-124
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 52.150 104 72-132
Dibromochloromethane ug/L 48.950 98 78-125
Dibromomethane ug/L 50.150 100 82-120
Ethylbenzene ug/L 52.150 104 79-121
Iodomethane ug/L 107100 107 39-154
m&p-Xylene ug/L 103100 103 81-124
Methylene Chloride ug/L 47.850 96 64-133
o-Xylene ug/L 52.050 104 79-131
Styrene ug/L 52.850 106 84-126
Tetrachloroethene ug/L 53.150 106 78-122
Toluene ug/L 49.950 100 80-121
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 47.450 95 71-127
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 51.250 102 69-141
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene ug/L 39.450 79 40-160
Trichloroethene ug/L 52.250 104 78-122
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L 48.550 97 53-137
Vinyl acetate ug/L 103100 103 40-160
Vinyl chloride ug/L 38.950 78 58-137
Xylene (Total)ug/L 155150 103 81-126
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)%97 70-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%100 70-130
Toluene-d8 (S)%98 70-130
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1960246MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
MSSpike
Result
92334202001
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 20.720 104 70-130<0.33
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L 20.420 102 70-130<0.48
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 21.620 108 70-130<0.40
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L 21.520 108 70-130<0.29
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L 19.720 98 70-130<0.32
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/L 21.120 105 70-166<0.56
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/L 21.120 106 70-130<0.41
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L 19.220 96 70-130<2.0
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/L 21.720 109 70-130<0.27
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 22.620 113 70-130<0.30
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L 19.020 94 70-1300.25J
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 21.520 108 70-130<0.27
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 22.720 114 70-130<0.33
2-Butanone (MEK)ug/L 37.840 95 70-130<0.96
2-Hexanone ug/L 41.440 103 70-130<0.46
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ug/L 41.440 103 70-130<0.33
Acetone ug/L 41.240 92 70-130<10.0
Acrylonitrile ug/L 96.7100 97 70-130<1.9
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 03/28/2017 03:58 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 22 of 30
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1960246MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
MSSpike
Result
92334202001
Benzene ug/L 22.720 114 70-148<0.25
Bromochloromethane ug/L 20.120 100 70-130<0.17
Bromodichloromethane ug/L 22.020 110 70-130<0.18
Bromoform ug/L 18.720 93 70-130<0.26
Bromomethane ug/L 17.220 86 70-130<0.29
Carbon disulfide ug/L 18.320 91 70-130<1.2
Carbon tetrachloride ug/L 22.920 114 70-130<0.25
Chlorobenzene ug/L 23.420 117 70-146<0.23
Chloroethane ug/L 17.420 87 70-130<0.54
Chloroform ug/L 20.020 100 70-130<0.14
Chloromethane ug/L 18.720 93 70-130<0.11
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 20.020 100 70-130<0.19
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 20.120 101 70-130<0.13
Dibromochloromethane ug/L 19.820 99 70-130<0.21
Dibromomethane ug/L 21.520 108 70-130<0.21
Ethylbenzene ug/L 23.420 117 70-130<0.30
Iodomethane ug/L 42.340 106 70-130<0.32
m&p-Xylene ug/L 46.340 116 70-130<0.66
Methylene Chloride ug/L 19.520 97 70-130<0.97
o-Xylene ug/L 22.720 113 70-130<0.23
Styrene ug/L 22.720 113 70-130<0.26
Tetrachloroethene ug/L 23.220 114 70-1300.49J
Toluene ug/L 22.420 112 70-155<0.26
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 20.520 103 70-130<0.49
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 19.520 97 70-130<0.26
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene ug/L 17.920 90 70-130<1.0
Trichloroethene ug/L 23.120 116 69-151<0.47
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L 21.120 105 70-130<0.20
Vinyl acetate ug/L 37.040 93 70-130<0.35
Vinyl chloride ug/L 13.8 M1206970-130<0.62
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)%93 70-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%102 70-130
Toluene-d8 (S)%99 70-130
Parameter Units
Dup
Result
Max
RPD QualifiersRPDResult
92334202002
1960247SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L <0.33 30<0.33
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L <0.48 30<0.48
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L <0.40 30<0.40
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L <0.29 30<0.29
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L 1.2 1 301.3
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/L <0.56 30<0.56
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/L <0.41 30<0.41
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L <2.0 30<2.0
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 03/28/2017 03:58 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 23 of 30
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
Dup
Result
Max
RPD QualifiersRPDResult
92334202002
1960247SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/L <0.27 30<0.27
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L <0.30 30<0.30
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L <0.24 300.31J
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L <0.27 30<0.27
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L <0.33 30<0.33
2-Butanone (MEK)ug/L 4.4J 30<0.96
2-Hexanone ug/L <0.46 30<0.46
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ug/L <0.33 30<0.33
Acetone ug/L <10.0 30<10.0
Acrylonitrile ug/L <1.9 30<1.9
Benzene ug/L <0.25 30<0.25
Bromochloromethane ug/L <0.17 30<0.17
Bromodichloromethane ug/L <0.18 30<0.18
Bromoform ug/L <0.26 30<0.26
Bromomethane ug/L <0.29 30<0.29
Carbon disulfide ug/L <1.2 30<1.2
Carbon tetrachloride ug/L <0.25 30<0.25
Chlorobenzene ug/L <0.23 30<0.23
Chloroethane ug/L <0.54 30<0.54
Chloroform ug/L <0.14 30<0.14
Chloromethane ug/L 0.32J 300.34J
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 1.3 6 301.4
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L <0.13 30<0.13
Dibromochloromethane ug/L <0.21 30<0.21
Dibromomethane ug/L <0.21 30<0.21
Ethylbenzene ug/L <0.30 30<0.30
Iodomethane ug/L <0.32 30<0.32
m&p-Xylene ug/L <0.66 30<0.66
Methylene Chloride ug/L <0.97 30<0.97
o-Xylene ug/L <0.23 30<0.23
Styrene ug/L <0.26 30<0.26
Tetrachloroethene ug/L <0.46 30<0.46
Toluene ug/L <0.26 30<0.26
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L <0.49 30<0.49
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L <0.26 30<0.26
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene ug/L <1.0 30<1.0
Trichloroethene ug/L <0.47 30<0.47
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L <0.20 30<0.20
Vinyl acetate ug/L <0.35 30<0.35
Vinyl chloride ug/L <0.62 30<0.62
Xylene (Total)ug/L <0.66 30<0.66
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)%93 390
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%100 298
Toluene-d8 (S)%101 1100
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 03/28/2017 03:58 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 24 of 30
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
353458
EPA 300.0
EPA 300.0
300.0 IC Anions, Low Level
Associated Lab Samples:92334202001, 92334202002, 92334202003, 92334202004
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK:1960451
Associated Lab Samples:92334202001, 92334202002, 92334202003, 92334202004
Matrix:Water
AnalyzedMDL
Sulfate mg/L <0.50 1.0 03/23/17 12:090.50
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1960452LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
Sulfate mg/L 49.450 99 90-110
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qual% RecConc.
1960453MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
MSSpike
Result
92334202001
1960454
MSD
Result
MSD
% Rec RPD RPD
Max
MSDMS
Spike
Conc.
Sulfate mg/L 50 96 90-11096 0 10507.9 55.9 55.8
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 03/28/2017 03:58 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 25 of 30
#=QL#
QUALIFIERS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
DEFINITIONS
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to dilution of the sample aliquot.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL - Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit.
RL - Reporting Limit.
S - Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine decomposes to and cannot be separated from Azobenzene using Method 8270. The result for each analyte is
a combined concentration.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
SG - Silica Gel - Clean-Up
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2 Chloroethylvinyl ether.
A separate vial preserved to a pH of 4-5 is recommended in SW846 Chapter 4 for the analysis of Acrolein and Acrylonitrile by EPA
Method 8260.
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
TNI - The NELAC Institute.
LABORATORIES
Pace Analytical Services - AshevillePASI-A
Pace Analytical Services - CharlottePASI-C
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
Analyte was detected in the associated method blank.B
Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery.M1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 03/28/2017 03:58 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 26 of 30
#=CR#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92334202
J17030057
Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method QC Batch Analytical Method
Analytical
Batch
92334202001 353165 3533662017006986EPA 3010A EPA 6010
92334202002 353165 3533662017006987EPA 3010A EPA 6010
92334202003 353165 3533662017006988EPA 3010A EPA 6010
92334202004 353165 3533662017006989EPA 3010A EPA 6010
92334202001 353482 3538852017006986EPA 7470 EPA 7470
92334202002 353482 3538852017006987EPA 7470 EPA 7470
92334202003 353482 3538852017006988EPA 7470 EPA 7470
92334202004 353482 3538852017006989EPA 7470 EPA 7470
92334202001 3534152017006986EPA 8260
92334202002 3534152017006987EPA 8260
92334202003 3534152017006988EPA 8260
92334202004 3534152017006989EPA 8260
92334202001 3534582017006986EPA 300.0
92334202002 3534582017006987EPA 300.0
92334202003 3534582017006988EPA 300.0
92334202004 3534582017006989EPA 300.0
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 03/28/2017 03:58 PM
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 27 of 30
Page 28 of 30
Page 29 of 30
Page 30 of 30
Appendix VI – Slug Testing Data
0.1.2E+3 2.4E+3 3.6E+3 4.8E+3 6.0E+3
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
D i s p l a c e m e n t
(f t )
SLUG TEST
Data Set:\...\MW-8-SlugIn.aqt
Date:02/22/17 Time:14:17:50
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company:S&ME, Inc.
Client:Duke Energy
Project:7126-16-045
Location:New Hill, NC
Test Well:MW-8
Test Date:1/17/2017
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness:33.9 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr):1.
WELL DATA (MW-8)
Initial Displacement:3.28 ft Static Water Column Height:23.9 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth:23.9 ft Screen Length:15.8 ft
Casing Radius:0.086 ft Well Radius:0.167 ft
Gravel Pack Porosity:0.3
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model:Unconfined Solution Method:Bouwer-Rice
K =0.07099 ft/day y0 =2.848 ft
0.2.0E+3 4.0E+3 6.0E+3 8.0E+3 1.0E+4
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
D i s p l a c e m e n t
(f t )
SLUG TEST
Data Set:\...\MW-8-SlugOut.aqt
Date:02/22/17 Time:14:32:58
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company:S&ME, Inc.
Client:Duke Energy
Project:7126-16-045
Location:New Hill, NC
Test Well:MW-8
Test Date:1/17/2017
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness:33.9 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr):1.
WELL DATA (MW-8)
Initial Displacement:3.47 ft Static Water Column Height:23.9 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth:23.9 ft Screen Length:15.8 ft
Casing Radius:0.086 ft Well Radius:0.167 ft
Gravel Pack Porosity:0.3
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model:Unconfined Solution Method:Bouwer-Rice
K =0.06334 ft/day y0 =2.98 ft
0.4.0E+3 8.0E+3 1.2E+4 1.6E+4 2.0E+4
1.
10.
Time (sec)
D i s p l a c e m e n t
(f t )
SLUG TEST
Data Set:\...\MW-9-SlugIn.aqt
Date:02/22/17 Time:14:55:28
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company:S&ME, Inc.
Client:Duke Energy
Project:7126-16-045
Location:New Hill, NC
Test Well:MW-9
Test Date:1/16/17
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness:35.08 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr):1.
WELL DATA (MW-9)
Initial Displacement:3.136 ft Static Water Column Height:25.08 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth:25.08 ft Screen Length:17.2 ft
Casing Radius:0.086 ft Well Radius:0.167 ft
Gravel Pack Porosity:0.3
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model:Unconfined Solution Method:Bouwer-Rice
K =0.01063 ft/day y0 =2.981 ft
0.4.0E+3 8.0E+3 1.2E+4 1.6E+4 2.0E+4
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
D i s p l a c e m e n t
(f t )
SLUG TEST
Data Set:\...\MW-9-SlugOut.aqt
Date:02/23/17 Time:11:12:49
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company:S&ME, Inc.
Client:Duke Energy
Project:7126-16-045
Location:New Hill, NC
Test Well:MW-9
Test Date:1/16/17
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness:35.08 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr):1.
WELL DATA (MW-9)
Initial Displacement:3.21 ft Static Water Column Height:27.41 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth:25.08 ft Screen Length:17.2 ft
Casing Radius:0.086 ft Well Radius:0.167 ft
Gravel Pack Porosity:0.3
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model:Unconfined Solution Method:Bouwer-Rice
K =0.01177 ft/day y0 =2.82 ft