Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07029_Parker Hannifin_EMP_201706162725 East Millbrook Road, Suite 121 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Telephone 919-871-0999 Fax 919-871-0335 www.atcgroupservices.com June 16, 2017 Mr. Tony Duque Division of Waste Management – Brownfields Program North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Mail Service Center 1646 Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646 Subject: Environmental Management Plan Parker Hannifin Brownfields Site 12415 Capital Boulevard Wake Forest, Wake County, North Carolina Brownfields Project No. 07029-03-92 Dear Mr. Duque: ATC Group Services LLC (ATC), on behalf of RREF BB NC SICP LLC, is submitting the attached Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for the above referenced site for your review. If you have any questions or require further information, please contact Genna Olson at (919) 573-1193 or counsel for the developer, Kimberly Hale, at (404) 812-0845. Sincerely, ATC Group Services LLC Genna K. Olson, P.G. Principal Geologist Attachments: Environmental Management Plan Appendix A – AECOM Soils/Materials Management Plan during Site Structure Demolition Activities (Management Plan Appendix B – Construction Redevelopment Plans Appendix C – Soil Assessment Data Appendix D – Groundwater and Surface Water Assessment Data Appendix E – Soil Gas and Sub-Slab Gas Assessment Data cc: Kimberly Hale – Kazmarek Mowrey Cloud Laseter LLP, Rhodes Adair – RREF BB NC SICP LLC, Bob Wyrick – AECOM, Jim Schenker – Parker Hannifin Corporation 1 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014    NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN  This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in  the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a project manager for the  program.  Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all  pertinent attachments to their project manager prior to any site earthmoving or other  development related activities. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it must be  completed, reviewed by the program, and signed by all signers at the bottom. Consult your  project manager if you have questions.        Date:   6/16/2017    Brownfields Assigned Project Name:  Parker Hannifin    Brownfields Project Number: 07029‐03‐92    Brownfields Property Address: 12415 Capital Boulevard, Wake Forest, NC    Brownfields Property Area (acres): 30.51 Acres    Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit? ☒ Yes  ☐ No  If yes enter Permit No.:  NCD002591014    Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit? ☐ Yes ☒ No  If yes, enter Permit No.:        Prospective Developer (PD): RREF BB NC SICP LLC  Phone Numbers:   Office: (770) 580‐6574    Mobile: (404) 426‐3290  Email: rhodes.adair@rialtocapital.com     Primary PD Contact: Rhodes Adair  Phone Numbers:  Office:  (770) 580‐6574     Mobile:  (404) 426‐3290  Email: Rhodes.adair@rialtocapital.com   Environmental Consultant:    Consultant for Developer:  ATC Group Services, LLC  Phone Numbers:   Office: (919) 871‐0999    Mobile: (919) 606‐9926  Email: genna.olson@atcassociates.com    GENERAL INFORMATION  COMMUNICATIONS  2 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014    Consultant for Parker Hannifin:  AECOM Technical Services of North Carolina, Inc.  Phone Numbers:   Office: (919) 461‐1440    Mobile: (919) 413‐4987  Email: bob.wyrick@aecom.com  Brownfields Program Project Manager: Tony Duque  Office: (919) 707‐8380  Email:  tony.duque@ncdenr.gov    Other DENR Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,  Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):  NC Hazardous Waste Section (HWS) Project Manager, Joe  Ghiold, (919) 707‐8375, joe.ghiold@ncdenr.gov           Advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept  minimum notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task:  On‐site assessment or remedial activities: Within 10 days    ☒ Construction or grading start: Within 10 days  ☒ Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of  previously unknown contamination: Within 48 hours  ☒ Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood, or soil erosion control  measures in area of contamination, venting of explosive environments):  Within 48 hours ☒ Installation of mitigation systems: Within 10 days    ☒ Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to  implement redevelopment activities: (as applicable): Within 30 days    ☒ 1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):  ☐ Residential  ☐ Recreational ☐ Institutional ☒ Commercial ☐ Office  ☐ Retail ☐ Industrial  ☐ Other specify:     2) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (attach conceptual or detailed plans as available):  a) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?: ☒ Yes  ☐ No  ☐ Unknown  b) Do plans include removal of building foundation slab(s) or pavement:  ☒ Yes ☐ No  ☐ Unknown    c) Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of  building slabs/pavement and other structures:     The property previously contained a manufacturing facility operated by Parker Hannifin. The  former manufacturing building is vacant and has been partially demolished.  As part of the  NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM  REDEVELOPMENT PLANS  3 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014    redevelopment, the remaining building structures and other appurtenances, concrete pads,  and materials will be demolished and removed.  Note that two concrete structures are located  in the building area that are associated with SWMU #16 – Sand Filter Beds.  These structures  will not be removed during this phase of work and will be managed under a separate future  workplan.      Following removal of the existing structure, redevelopment activities will commence in the  southwestern portion of the Brownfields property.  Phase 1 of the redevelopment will include  construction of a 63,000 square foot retail sporting goods store and associated parking lot.  The  Phase 1 redevelopment area covers approximately 7 acres.  This portion of the Brownfields  property is expected to be subdivided into a separate property parcel in the future.  Grading  associated with the Phase 1 redevelopment will be limited to this 7 acre area, and this EMP is  intended only to cover the Phase 1 redevelopment activities in this 7 acre area.  Additional  phases of redevelopment in the northern and eastern portions of the Brownfields property will  be covered in a future EMP to be submitted under separate cover.    A Soils/Materials Management Plan during Site Structure Demolition Activities (Management  Plan) prepared by Parker Hannifin’s consultant, AECOM Technical Services of North Carolina,  Inc. (AECOM), is included in Appendix A.  The Management Plan describes measures to be  taken to address impacted media during redevelopment activities in accordance with the  requirements of the NC HWS and the RCRA Permit for the site.  The Management Plan also  contains figures showing the existing site structures and areas of soil contamination overlain by  the proposed redevelopment plan and grading plan.  The Management Plan has been  submitted to the NC HWS for review and approval. If edits to the plan are made based on  comments received from the NC HWS, ATC will update this EMP accordingly and provide a  revised version to the Brownfields Program.  The Phase 1 redevelopment construction plans  are included in Appendix B.      3) Which category of risk‐based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in  the Brownfields Agreement?  ☐ Residential   ☒ Non‐residential or Industrial/Commercial     Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall be cited in the Brownfields  Agreement for comparison purposes.    A Brownfields Agreement (BFA) was previously finalized for the property dated June 1, 2006.   The property covered by the BFA includes Parcel Identification Numbers 1831646036 and  1831644698.  The BFA specifies that property use be limited to mixed commercial uses.    4) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule): The formal construction schedule  has not yet been finalized but will be provided to the Brownfields Program upon completion.  a) Phase 1 start date and anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):  7/1/2017  The Phase 1 redevelopment is expected to start in July 2017, pending regulatory approval to  proceed from the NC HWS.  Redevelopment is expected to be completed by the fall of 2017.    a) If applicable, Phase 2 start date and anticipated duration (specify activities during  each phase):  4 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014    Additional phases of redevelopment are likely to be implemented.  However, the schedule  for the additional phases has not been confirmed and this EMP is intended only to cover the  Phase 1 redevelopment activities.  Additional phases of redevelopment will be covered in a  future EMP to be submitted under separate cover.     b) Additional phases planned? If yes, specify activities if known:  ☐ Yes  ☐ No  ☐ Not in the foreseeable future  ☒ Decision pending    c) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings:   9/1/2017      Contaminated Media (attach tabulated data summaries for each impacted media and figure(s)  with sample locations):  Part 1. Soil: ☒ Yes  ☐ No  ☐ Suspected  Part 2. Groundwater: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected  Part 3. Surface Water: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected  Part 4.  Sediment: ☐ Yes    ☒ No   ☐ Suspected  Part 5. Soil Vapor: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected  Part 6. Sub‐Slab Soil Vapor:    ☐ Yes  ☒ No  ☐ Suspected  Part 7. Indoor Air: ☐ Yes  ☒ No    ☐ Suspected    Tables and figures from prior reports that summarize prior assessment data for each impacted media  are included the appendices to this EMP.  Soil assessment data are summarized in Appendix C,  groundwater and surface water assessment data are summarized in Appendix D, and soil vapor and  sub‐slab vapor assessment data are summarized in Appendix E.        1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list specific compounds):     Impacted soil has been identified in three areas of the site: (1) Northeast Building Area (NEBA);  (2) Area of Concern (AOC) 38; and Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) 31/33 area.     In the NEBA, a number of volatile organic compounds have been detected, but  trichloroethylene (TCE) is the predominant constituent of concern (COC) in terms of area of  impact and constituents.  The metals cadmium and chromium are also considered COCs.  A  portion of the existing building to be demolished is located over the NEBA.  In addition, the area  of grading to be performed during the Phase 1 redevelopment encroaches onto a small portion  of impacted soil in the NEBA.    CONTAMINATED MEDIA  PART 1.  SOIL – Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate  using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure  overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.  5 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014    In AOC 38, the primary COCs are TCE, tetrachloroethylene (PCE), and cis‐1,2‐dichloroethylene  (cis‐1,2‐DCE). A small area of a concrete to be demolished is located over AOC 38.  Other than  potential disturbance during removal of the concrete pad, which is expected to be minimal, soils  in AOC 38 will not be disturbed during the Phase 1 redevelopment.    In the SWMU 31/33 area, the primary COCs are TCE, PCE, select petroleum hydrocarbons  (extractable petroleum hydrocarbon [EPH] range), and cobalt.  A portion of the existing building  to be demolished is located over the SWMU 31/33 area.  Other than potential disturbance  during removal of the existing building, which is expected to be minimal, soils in SWMU 31/33  will not be disturbed during the Phase 1 redevelopment.    2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):  In the NEBA, impacted soil extends from the  ground surface to the water table, which is present at depths of approximately 35 to 40 feet below  ground surface (bgs) in this area of the site.  In AOC 38, impacted soil extends from the ground  surface to a depth of approximately 12 feet bgs.  In the SWMU 31/33 area, impacted soil extends  from the ground surface to a depth of at least 16 feet bgs.  3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):  394,000 square feet (Note that this includes  both the grading area and the structure demolition area.)  4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet): The maximum cut during grading will be in the area of a  proposed stormwater retention pond, where cuts of up to 11 feet will be performed.  The proposed  stormwater retention pond is not in an area of known soil contamination.  Grading cuts over the rest  of the property are typically on the order of 2 feet or less.  5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan): The grading plan  indicates the total cut volume minus the total fill volume is 4,600 cubic yards.  6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:  The estimated volume of excavated soil anticipated to be impacted by contaminants is 80 cubic  yards.    7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:   As documented in the Management Plan in Appendix A, contaminated soil will be characterized  for disposal in accordance with the NC HWS Contained‐In Policy for Soil Contaminated with Listed  Hazardous Waste (Contained‐In Policy).  If soil sampling indicates no exceedences of the “Levels  for Unrestricted Use” specified in the Contained‐In Policy, the soil may be reused on site as fill  material.  If soil sampling indicates exceedences of the “Levels for Unrestricted Use”, the soil will  be transported off‐site for disposal either at a Municipal Solid Waste Landfill, Hazardous Waste  Landfill, or other appropriately permitted disposal facility depending on analytical data.  Based on  the data available at this time, 80 cubic yards of impacted soil are anticipated to be transported  off‐site for disposal.    IMPORTED FILL SOIL      1) Will fill soil be imported to the site? ☐ Yes  ☒ No  ☐ Unknown    2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?      3) If yes, what is the depth of fill soil to be used at the property?      If a range of depths, please list the range.  6 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014    4) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide plan to analyze fill soil to  demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards and can be considered clean for use at the  Brownfields property (Check all that apply):  ☐ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260  ☐ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270  ☐ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury, lead,  selenium and silver)  ☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List ‐14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium  (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel,  selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc)  ☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium (speciated  according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver,  thallium, and zinc)  ☐ Other Constituents & Analytical Method:   ☐ Known borrow material (DESCRIBE SOURCE AND ATTACH SAMPLING PROFILE):   The grading plan indicates the net cut volume minus the net fill volume is 4,600 cubic yards.  It is  anticipated that an additional estimated 80 cubic yards of contaminated soil will need to be  transported off‐site rather than used as fill.  Based on these volumes no fill material is anticipated  to be imported to the site during the Phase 1 redevelopment activities.     MANAGING ONSITE SOIL      1) If soil in known or suspected areas of contamination is anticipated to be excavated from the  Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields Property, or otherwise disturbed during  site grading or other redevelopment activities, please provide a grading plan that clearly  illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are acceptable, if only  preliminary data available).   The Management Plan in Appendix A contains figures showing the existing site structures and  areas of soil contamination overlain by the proposed redevelopment plan and grading plan.  As  shown, approximately 1 foot of soil will be removed in a small area of contaminated soil  associated with the NEBA.  This area encompasses approximately 2,145 square feet or 80 cubic  yards.  Please note that soils in this area are not anticipated to be above the NCDEQ IHSB  Commercial/Industrial PSRGs.     Note that a minimal volume of soil may also adhere to the floor slab during demolition of the  existing building.  This volume of soil is anticipated to be minimal, but will be removed using dry  brushing techniques and handled as potentially contaminated soil per the procedures detailed in  this EMP and the Management Plan in Appendix A.   2) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION – Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the  North Carolina Hazardous Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31‐261.35? ☒ Yes ☐ No    If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes generating the  waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).   During operation, the manufacturing facility at the site handled listed hazardous waste codes F006  (electroplating wastewater treatment sludge) and F008 (plating bath residues from cyanide plating  7 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014    process).    If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained‐Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the North Carolina   Contained‐In Policy?  ☒ Yes ☐ No    As documented in the Management Plan in Appendix A, contaminated soil will be characterized for  disposal in accordance with the Contained‐In Policy.   If soil sampling indicates no exceedences of  the “Levels for Unrestricted Use” specified in the Contained‐In Policy, the soil may be reused on  site as fill material.  If soil sampling indicates exceedences of the “Levels for Unrestricted Use”, the  soil will be transported off‐site for disposal either at a Municipal Solid Waste Landfill, Hazardous  Waste Landfill, or other appropriately permitted disposal facility depending on analytical data.      NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS THE  CONTAINED‐OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA CONTAINED‐IN POLICY THE  SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENR  HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.    3) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION – Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?:  ☐ Yes ☐ No   If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).  ☐ Ignitability  ☐ Corrosivity  ☐ Reactivity  ☐ Toxicity  ☐ TCLP results  ☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual hazardous  constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory TCLP standard)     If no, explain rationale:   As discussed above, contaminated soil will be characterized for disposal in accordance with the  Contained‐In Policy.   It is possible that some soil may be characterized as both a listed waste and a  characteristic waste depending on soil analytical data and based on toxicity, TCLP results, and/or  rule of 20 results.       NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE SOIL MAY NOT BE  RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENR HAZARDOUS WASTE  SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.    4) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in  place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):  ☐ Preliminary Health‐Based Residential SRGs 2/5/2016  ☐ Preliminary Health‐Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs 2/5/2016  ☐ Site‐specific risk‐based cleanup level, or acceptable concentrations determined via  calculated cumulative risk. Enter details of methods used for determination/explanation:  During the Phase 1 redevelopment, the quantity of soil to be excavated will be the minimum needed to  8 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014    implement the proposed redevelopment plans.  Soil will not be excavated to the extent needed to  achieve a specific remedial goal.  Soil remediation activities to achieve site remedial goals will be  implemented at a later date in accordance with workplans to be submitted to the NC HWS.  As  discussed above, soil which needs to be excavated to implement the proposed redevelopment will be  handled and disposed of in accordance with the Contained‐In Policy.      5) Check the following action(s) to be taken during excavation and management of said soils:  ☒ Manage fugitive dust from site:  ☒ Yes ☐ No  If yes, describe method; If no, explain rationale:    Care will be taken during excavation in areas of impacted soil to minimize fugitive dust  emissions.  Monitoring will be performed using a photoionization detector (PID) to evaluate  whether vapors associated with fugitive dust or excavation activities pose a risk to workers per  Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) regulations.  If needed, engineering  controls and/or wetting and misting will be performed to minimize fugitive dust and/or worker  exposure to vapors.   ☒ Field Screening:  ☒ Yes ☐ No  If yes, describe method; If no, explain rationale:   Soil will be monitored during excavation screening using a PID and observations will be made to  identify staining, odors, or other indications of impact.  Field screening and supervision of  excavation will be performed by Parker Hannifin’s consultant, AECOM, during excavation within  or in proximity to areas of known soil contamination.  Outside these areas, the grading  contractor will be instructed to contact AECOM to mobilize to the site if field indications of  impacts are observed.  Note that the grading contractor for the site will be trained in dealing  with hazardous materials operations and emergency response and will therefore be qualified  to make this determination.  ☒ Soil Sample Collection:  ☒ Yes ☐ No  If yes, describe method (e.g., in‐situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.); If no, explain rationale:  Soil samples will be collected from the excavated soil for disposal characterization in  accordance with the Contained‐In Policy and the Management Plan included in Appendix  A.    ☒ Stockpile impacted soil in accordance with NCDENR IHSB protocol in the current version of  the “Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup”, and providing erosion control, prohibiting  contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, and preventing  contaminated runoff.   Explain any variances:  Soil will be stockpiled in accordance with NC IHSB  protocol and in accordance with the procedures approved by the NC HWS per the Management  Plan in Appendix A.    ☒ Analyze potentially impacted soil for the following chemical analytes:  ☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260  ☐ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270  ☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury,  9 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014    lead, selenium and silver)  ☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List ‐14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,  chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese,  mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc)  ☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium  (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony,  selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc)  ☐ Other Constituent(s) & Analytical Method(s):     ☒ Proposed Measures to Obtain Pre‐Approval for Reuse of Impacted Soil within the  Brownfields Property Boundary  ☐ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager  ☐ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on  site map to Brownfields Project Manager once known  ☐ Use geotextile to mark depth of fill material (provide description of material)  ☐ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒ or clean fill ☒ Describe cap or fill: Onsite infrastructure (provide location diagram)  ☐ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re‐  recorded if actions are Post‐Recordation).  ☒ Other:   Impacted soil will be handled in accordance with the Contained‐In Policy.  This policy allows  reuse of soil as fill only if concentrations are below the “Levels for Unrestricted Use”  specified in the policy.  If concentrations are below the “Levels for Unrestricted Use”, no  special approval measures should be required by either the NC HWS or the Brownfields  Section.  It is possible that impacts may be present in the concrete floor debris generated during  demolition of the existing building.  The concrete will be sampled for disposal  characterization. Depending on concentrations, the concrete may be either used as fill  material on‐site or transported off‐site for disposal at an appropriately permitted facility.   Note that the developer is working with the NC Solid Waste Section to confirm the criteria  for this determination.  Disposal of the concrete will be in accordance with the procedures  approved by both the NC HWS and the NC Solid Waste Section.    ☒ Final grade sampling of exposed soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or  permanent hardscape): [if not checked provide rationale for not needing]   As previously discussed, the goal of the proposed excavation will be to remove only the minimum  volume of soil needed to implement the proposed redevelopment plans.  Soil will not be  excavated to the extent needed to achieve a specific remedial goal.  Soil remediation activities will  be implemented at a later date in accordance with workplans to be submitted to the NC HWS.  In  addition, note that the areas of impacted soil located within the Phase 1 redevelopment area will  be primarily covered by asphalt parking following redevelopment, with the exception of some  minimal areas of impacted soil adjacent to the parking lot that will be covered with grassy parking  lot islands.  Grading will be performed sufficient to ensure there is at least 1 foot of fill material  (below commercial/industrial PSRGs) at the ground surface in the areas of contaminated soil  accessible to the public that will not be paved.     10 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014    Provide diagram of soil sampling locations, number of samples, and denote Chemical  Analytical Program with check boxes below (Check all that apply):  ☐ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260  ☐ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270  ☐ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury,  lead, selenium and silver)  ☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List ‐14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,  chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese,  mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc)  ☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium  (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony,  selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc)  ☐ Pesticides  ☐ PCBs  ☐ Other Constituents & Analytical Method: Click here to enter text.  As discussed above, the only soil sampling proposed is sampling of excavated soils for waste  characterization purposes.     OFFSITE TRANSPORT & DISPOSITION OF EXCAVATED SOIL  NOTE: Unless soil will be transported offsite for disposal in a permitted facility under applicable  regulations, no contaminated or potentially contaminated soil may leave the site without approval  from the brownfields program. Failure to obtain approval may violate a brownfields agreement,  endangering liability protections and making said action subject to enforcement.  Justifications  provided below must be approved by the Program in writing prior to completing transport activities.      ☒ Transport and dispose of impacted soil offsite (documentation of final disposition must be sent to  Brownfields Project Manager)  ☒ Landfill – analytical program determined by landfill   ☒ Landfarm or other treatment facility   ☐ Use as Beneficial Fill Offsite – provide justification:    ☐ Use as Beneficial Fill at another Suitable Brownfields Site – (Note: a determination that a  site is a “Suitable Brownfields” site will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of  the same or similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil as beneficial  soil will not increase the potential for risk to human health and the environment at that site,  and that notarized documentation of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of  the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Provide justification:      As discussed above, contaminated soil will be characterized for disposal in accordance with  the NC HWS Contained‐In Policy.   If soil sampling indicates no exceedences of the “Levels  for Unrestricted Use” specified in the Contained‐In Policy, the soil may be reused on site as  fill material.  If soil sampling indicates exceedences of the “Levels for Unrestricted Use”, the  soil will be transported off‐site for disposal either at a Municipal Solid Waste Landfill,  Hazardous Waste Landfill, or other appropriately permitted disposal facility depending on  analytical data.        11 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014    MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES  ☒ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill  (Preferred)  ☐ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a  hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they were  removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth from  which it was excavated.    ☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport, and/or  degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants? Result: Yes □ No □  If no, include rationale here.     If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials    Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:     Based on the latest assessment data, impacted soil may be encountered in the area of stormwater  drainage lines to be installed in the northeastern portion of the property.  If impacted soil remains in  these areas following grading that will be in contact with the utility trench, a 10 mil polyethylene liner will  be placed in the trench prior to filling with clean fill material.        What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?      The depth to groundwater in the area of the Phase 1 redevelopment is approximately 35 feet bgs.    Is groundwater known to be contaminated by   ☒ onsite  ☐ offsite  ☐ both  ☐ or unknown  sources? Describe source(s):    Groundwater on the property is contaminated due to historical manufacturing operations  performed between 1964 and 2002.  The specific sources of contamination include: (1) a system for  the treatment of waste water generated by metal finishing and plating operations; and (2) storage  and use of chlorinated solvents to remove oil and metal particles from machined parts during the  manufacturing process.    What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?   The direction of groundwater flow at the property is generally to the north and west.      Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?   ☐ Yes   ☒ No  If yes, describe these activities:   Groundwater is not expected to be encountered during the redevelopment activities.  The  maximum cuts during gradient will be performed in the area of a proposed stormwater basin.  In  this area, cut will be performed to a depth of up to 11 feet bgs or less, which is still substantially  above the groundwater elevation at 35 feet bgs.      Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.  PART 2. GROUNDWATER – Please fill out the information below and attach figure showing  distribution of groundwater contaminants at site  PART 3. SURFACE WATER – Please fill out the information below.  12 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014      Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated:   ☒ Yes ☐ No    Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment activities?  ☐ Yes   ☒ No    In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment activities,  or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of such events  (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run‐off, stormwater impacts):     Impacts have been identified in a tributary which originates on the source property then  discharges to Horse Creek approximately 1,200 feet northwest of the Brownfields property.   The Phase 1 redevelopment activities will occur in the southern portion of the property and no  surface water bodies are located within the redevelopment area.  In addition, concentrations  of COCs in surface water did not exceed Title 15A NCAC 2B .0202 Surface Water Standards  during the latest reported sampling event.      A sediment and erosion control plan will be prepared in accordance with state and local  requirements and implemented as part of the redevelopment.  The plan will detail measures to  minimize the potential for stormwater impacts due to erosion.  In addition, weather conditions  will be monitoring during the timeframe when contaminated soils may be exposed.  If deemed  warranted based on weather conditions, contaminated soils exposed during excavation may be  covered to prevent contaminated surface water run‐off.        Is sediment at the property known to be contaminated:    ☐ Yes ☒ No    Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment activities?  ☐ Yes   ☒ No    If yes, attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.    In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list  activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):   As discussed in the prior section, no surface water bodies are located within the proposed Phase  1 redevelopment area.  In addition, sediment impacts have not been identified at the site  historically.      Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following  vapor intrusion screening levels in the following media:    IHSB Residential Screening Levels:  Soil Vapor:      ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐Unknown  Groundwater: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown    PART 4. SEDIMENT – Please fill out the information below.  PART 5. SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below.  13 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014    IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:  Soil Vapor:     ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown  Groundwater: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown    Attach a map showing the location of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site screening  levels. If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?   Soil gas sampling has been performed in the area of the proposed building.  The results of the  sampling indicated concentrations of TCE and 1,2,4‐trimethylbenzene above IHSB  Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels.   Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?  ☐ Yes   ☐ No ☒ Unknown    In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities  (trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work), list activities for management of  such contact:   A PID will be used to monitor ambient air quality during subgrade excavation work.  If PID readings  indicate a potential risk of vapor exposure for workers, engineering controls or other appropriate  measures will be taken to protect workers in accordance with OSHA regulations.  A vapor mitigation  system will be installed in the proposed building to eliminate future exposure by building occupants,  as discussed in Part 8.        Are sub‐slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property?   ☒ Yes  ☐ No ☐ Unknown    If data indicate that sub‐slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map  showing the location of these exceedances.    At what depth(s) is sub‐slab soil vapor known to be contaminated?  ☐ 0‐6 inches ☒ Other, If  other describe:  Sub‐slab vapor samples were collected at a depth of 6 to 8 inches bgs.    Will workers encounter contaminated sub‐slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?  ☐ Yes   ☐ No ☒ Unknown  In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list  activities for management of such contact:     A PID will be used to monitor ambient air quality during subgrade excavation work.  If PID readings  indicate a potential risk of vapor exposure for workers, engineering controls or other appropriate  measures will be taken to protect workers in accordance with OSHA regulations.  A vapor mitigation  system will be installed in the proposed building to eliminate future exposure by building occupants,  as discussed in Part 8.    PART 6. SUB‐SLAB SOIL VAPOR ‐please fill out the information below if existing buildings or  foundations will be retained in the redevelopment.  14 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014        Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property?   ☐ Yes  ☒ No   ☐ Unknown    If yes, attach a map showing the location where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.    If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk‐based screening levels  will not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter  contaminated indoor air during planned redevelopment activities?     ☐ Yes   ☐ No ☐ Unknown    In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list  activities for management of such contact:            Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system proposed for this Brownfields Property?  ☒ Yes   ☐ No  ☐ Unknown      If yes, provide the date the plan was submitted to the Brownfields Program.  The vapor mitigation system plan is currently being prepared and will be submitted to the  Brownfields Program under separate cover.    Has the vapor mitigation plan been approved by the NC Brownfields Program?  ☐ Yes  ☒ No ☐ Unknown    Has the vapor mitigation plan been signed and sealed by a North Carolina professional engineer?  ☐ Yes   ☐ No      What are the components of the vapor intrusion mitigation system?   The vapor mitigation system plan is currently being prepared, but is anticipated to consist of a  vapor barrier with a passive venting system that can be upgraded to an active venting system if  needed.    ☐ Sub‐slab depressurization system  ☐ Sub‐membrane depressurization system – If necessary the passive system can be converted to  active.  ☐ Block‐wall depressurization system  ☐ Drain tile depressurization system    ☒ Passive mitigation methods  ☒ Vapor barriers  PART 7. INDOOR AIR – Please fill out the information below.  PART 8 – Vapor Mitigation System – Please fill out the information below.  15 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014    ☒  Perforated piping vented to exterior  ☐ Other method:  Click here to enter text.        Please provide a contingency plan in the event unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or  other waste materials are encountered during site activities.  Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth‐moving activities  at the site:  ☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)  ☐ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility lines, etc.  ☒ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors    Notification to State Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other  officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of contamination  are discovered. See Notification Section on Page 1 for notification requirements.   If impacts are encountered that differ from known impacts, the appropriate notifications will be  made and measures to deal with newly identified impacts will be performed in accordance with this  EMP and/or applicable guidance and regulations.         In accordance with the site’s Brownfield Agreement, provide a report within the designated schedule  to the State Brownfields Project Manager.  ☒ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a redevelopment summary report in  compliance with the site’s Brownfields Agreement.     PART 9. CONTINGENCY FOR ENCOUNTERING UNKNOWN TANKS, DRUMS, OR OTHER WASTE  MATERIALS  POST‐REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING  Parker Hannifin Site Environmental Management Plan APPENDIX A AECOM SOILS/MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PLAN DURING SITE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES (MANAGEMENT PLAN) AECOM 1600 Perimeter Park Morrisville, NC 27560 T: 919.461.1100 F: 919.464.1415 aecom.com June 7, 2017-rev2 Mr. Joe Ghiold Project Manager Facility Management Branch Hazardous Waste Section, Division of Waste Management Department of Environmental Quality Green Square Complex DEQ Office Building 217 W Jones St, Raleigh, NC 27603 Subject: Soil/Materials Management Plan during Site Structure Demolition Activities (revision-2) Phase 1 Redevelopment Activities Former Parker Hannifin Facility EPA ID No. NCD-002-591-014 12415 Capital Boulevard, Wake Forest, Wake County, North Carolina Dear Mr. Ghiold, AECOM Technical Services of North Carolina, Inc. (AECOM) prepared this document on behalf of Parker Hannifin Corporation (Parker), to summarize the plan to be implemented to deal with potentially contaminated media during demolition of the remaining infrastructure and redevelopment of a portion of the former Parker Facility (Site) in Wake Forest, North Carolina. The Site is located at 12415 Capital Boulevard in Wake Forest, Wake County, North Carolina as illustrated on Figure 1. This facility is regulated under a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Part B Post Closure Permit as Site NCD-002-591-014 under the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), Hazardous Waste Section (HWS). Demolition of the remaining site structures, concrete pads, asphalt parking areas, and other appurtenances of the former facility will be performed by the current property owner. Parker/AECOM will be present to observe activities and identify/manage potentially impacted soils as necessary. Contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) include volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and metals. Background The property was previously owned by the Industrial Development Corporation (IDC) of the Town of Wake Forest. The IDC initially leased the property to Scovill Manufacturing Company which constructed the former plant in 1964 for the manufacture and distribution of air control devices. Parker acquired Scovill Manufacturing Company in 1986. Site manufacturing operations previously used chlorinated solvents, primarily trichloroethene, to degrease machined parts. Manufacturing operations ceased in January 2002, after which remaining process materials and equipment were removed. The property was purchased by St. Ives Commercial 220, LLC (St. Ives) from the IDC in 2006 and most of the former manufacturing building was demolished. The property was subsequently acquired by the current owner, RREF BB NC SICP LLC (c/o RREF BB Acquisitions, LLC; identified herein as Rialto Capital / Rialto) in 2012. The portion of the former manufacturing building containing the former plating room remains on the property. Several sections of concrete building slab, brick walls, concrete loading docks, concrete stairways, and sections of asphalt parking lot also remain on-Site. Proposed Redevelopment Parker/AECOM understands that the current property owner intends to redevelop the property. The proposed first phase of development (Phase I) will consist of construction of one commercial retail structure on the front portion of Wake County parcel pin lot 1831646036, along Wake Union Church Road. The proposed structure is approximately 65,000 square feet in size with slab on grade construction. A parking area will be constructed to the northeast of the future building. The proposed Phase 1 construction layout is illustrated in blue line on Figure 2. The property boundary and former manufacturing facility building are also illustrated on Figure 2. Parker/AECOM understands that redevelopment plans/documents for Phase 1 activities have been provided to the NCDEQ Brownfields and Hazardous Waste groups for review and approval. As part of the Phase 1 development, the remaining building structures will be demolished. No other subsurface activities or grading are planned for areas outside of Phase 1 at this time. Future development activities (Phase 2) may occur on Wake County Pin 1831644698. However, Phase 2 plans have not been finalized and this work plan only relates to development activities to be conducted during Phase 1. Pre-mobilization Environmental Features Survey Prior to site work, AECOM will use a high-precision, survey grade, global positioning system unit with sub- centimeter accuracy to identify and mark the limits of potentially impacted soils that are adjacent to or beneath remaining Site infrastructure. Also, the groundwater treatment system (GWTS) piping and existing groundwater monitoring wells will be marked to protect from potential damage/destruction. Features will be monitored and resurveyed/marked as necessary. Monitoring Well Protection Four monitoring wells (MW-1, MW-31, MW-36, and MW-37) are located within the proposed Phase 1 development area. Monitoring wells in the work zones will be marked prior to site work. The marking may include above grade staking and orange fencing/yellow caution tape (or equivalent) so that the well locations are apparent to grading contractors. AECOM staff will routinely visit the site during redevelopment to evaluate well integrity. If any wells are damaged or destroyed, the NCDEQ will be notified and the wells will be repaired or replaced, as necessary. Replacement wells will be installed at similar depths and locations and the NCDEQ will be notified regarding the location and proposed construction of replacement wells prior to completion. Groundwater Treatment System Demolition of the remaining structures may impact operation of the effluent discharge line from the existing GWTS. The property owner has indicated that the discharge piping can be maintained during property redevelopment. If relocation of the discharge piping is necessary, new piping will be installed prior to shut- down/disconnection of the current piping. If the piping is damaged, it will be repaired promptly. Currently, Parker/AECOM does not anticipate substantial interruption or shut-down of the GWTS. The NCDEQ will be notified if there are any changes to the operation of the GWTS during development. Groundwater Depth to water in the area of proposed Phase 1 redevelopment is approximately 35 feet below land surface. Based on the current plan, groundwater will not be encountered during redevelopment activities. If redevelopment plans are altered and there is a potential for contact with groundwater, the NCDEQ will be notified and a mitigation plan will be developed. Existing Fencing In response to the NCDEQ Environmental Indicator (EI) correspondence, dated March 28, 2012, chain-link fencing was installed around three areas of concern with impacted surface soils: (SWMU 16/Northeast Building Area [NEBA], SWMU 31/33, and AOC 38). A portion of this fencing may be removed during demolition activities (see below). However, temporary fencing/barricades will be placed around construction zones to restrict access during site work. Following demolition activities the fencing will be replaced and maintained with proper signage. Demolition The remaining building structures and other appurtenances, concrete pads, materials associated with the former manufacturing building, and remaining asphalt parking lot will be razed and removed by others (property owner/contractors). Parker/AECOM will monitor these activities to assist with locating site features (wells, piping, etc.) and potentially impacted soils. Figure 3 illustrates the remaining structures to be removed, the proposed stockpile area, truck routes, decontamination areas, and related demolition components. The concrete structures located within the NEBA that are associated with SWMU #16 – Sand Filter Beds will not be modified or removed during this phase of work and will be managed under a separate work plan. Fencing, barricades, and/or other controls will be maintained by the property owner/developer around the work zones and during development to restrict access and prevent unauthorized entry to the work zone(s). Surface Grading Following demolition activities, surface grading will be performed for construction of the retail facility proposed in the Phase I development plan (shown in blue line on Figure 2). Figure 4 illustrates the grading plan for the proposed Phase 1 area. Figure 5 illustrates an area of approximately 2,144 square feet (sq. ft.) of potentially impacted soils that will be removed during grading. Current plans indicated the anticipated grading depth is approximately 1 foot, which equates to removal of approximately 80 yards of potentially impacted soil. Management of impacted soils is discussed below. Grading/subsurface soil disturbance is not planned for areas outside of the Phase 1 development area. Management of graded/disturbed soils is discussed below. Building Materials Management Plan Based on previous soil sampling, three distinct areas of concern (AOCs) have been identified with known impacts to soils. These areas are illustrated on Figure 2. The remaining building structure, concrete pads and asphalt parking lot are located adjacent to the NEBA, SWMU #31/33 area, and AOC#38. AECOM/Parker has assumed that the brick walls, roofing, steel support beams, and other above-ground building materials will be disposed at an approved Construction and Demolition (C&D) landfill. The concrete flooring/pads that remain and are associated with the former building will be sampled to characterize for disposal. Based on the known site COPCs, concrete samples will be analyzed for the following: VOCs by EPA 8260 and metals by EPA Methods 6010B (arsenic, chromium, cobalt, and nickel), and 7471 (mercury). Concrete floor characterization samples will be collected prior to demolition at a frequency of one every approximately 100 cubic yards to determine if COCs are below the criteria for unrestricted use and can be disposed at an approved C&D landfill, used as beneficial fill on-site, or disposed at an appropriate approved landfill. A Beneficial Use Determination was previous approved for concrete materials on Site in correspondence from the NCDEQ dated June 29, 2006 (Attachment 1). Beneficial reuse or an appropriate approved landfill will be selected based on analytical data and disposal records will be obtained. Alternately based on analytical results, building materials may be managed under the NCDEQ Solid Waste program or the contained in policy as approved by NCDEQ in correspondence dated August 20, 2007 (Attachment 1). . Soil Management Plan The areas where soils above the NCDEQ Inactive Site Branch Protection of Groundwater (PoG) screening levels may be encountered during demolition activities are illustrated on Figure 2. No soils above NCDEQ Commercial/Industrial screening levels have been detected in the proposed Phase 1 development area. Within the areas with soils potentially greater than PoG levels, soils that adhere to the bottom of the concrete or asphalt pads will be removed using dry brushing techniques. Soils potentially above PoG levels that are removed during grading of the proposed Phase 1 area (see above, Figure 5) will be temporarily staged on minimum 6 ml plastic sheeting, bermed with hay bales (or equivalent), and covered with plastic to inhibit erosion and other impacts from weather. The temporary staging area for soils is shown on Figure 3. Waste characterization sampling of the soil stockpile(s) will be performed to appropriately manage soils according to the NCDEQ HWS Contained-In Policy and to meet the requirements of the selected waste disposal facility. Soil characterization samples will consist of composite samples collected from the stockpiled soil materials at frequency of one every approximately 25 cubic yards. Soil samples will be collected from the middle and/or lower portion of the stockpile and analyzed for VOCs using EPA Method 8260B, and metals by EPA Methods 6010B (arsenic, chromium, cobalt, and nickel), and 7471 (mercury). Contained-In Policy Review Analytical data for soils and concrete will be compared to screening levels presented in the Contained-In Policy, as follows: 1. Unrestricted Use – Concrete or soils containing COPCs at concentrations below the criteria for unrestricted use will be kept on-site and used for backfill or disposed at an approved C&D landfill. 2. Restricted Soils/Materials – Concrete or soils containing COPCs at concentrations above the criteria for unrestricted use, but below the maximum concentration allowed for disposal in a municipal solid waste landfill (MSWLF) – Concrete may be used on-site as beneficial fill or loaded directly into trucks for off-site disposal at a Subtitle D landfill.1 These materials may require limited short-term staging on-site due to characterization sampling and analysis and/or truck traffic limitations. 3. Hazardous Soils/Materials – Concrete or soils containing COPCs at concentrations above the criteria for disposal in a MSWLF may be initially staged in lined, covered roll-off boxes or stockpiled on-site. Samples will be collected and analyzed from these stockpiles to meet the disposal requirements for the selected hazardous waste disposal facility. 1 NCDEQ’s Waste Management Division has agreed that the concrete may be used as beneficial fill if it meets all required criteria. Concrete and soil stockpiles generated during the demolition work will be profiled and manifested according to the results of laboratory analysis. Restricted or hazardous wastes will be transported and disposed of at off-site permitted landfills according to their classification. Based on sample results, it is possible that all concrete debris will be crushed and used on-site as beneficial fill. Closing Please contact Jim Schenker, Parker Hannifin, or Bob Wyrick, AECOM, if you have any comments or questions. Sincerely, Matt Allen, PG Bob Wyrick, P.G. Project Geologist Geosciences Director Attachments: Figure 1. Topographic Site Location Map Figure 2. Site Layout – Proposed Phase 1 Development Figure 3. Proposed Phase 1 Demolition Plan Figure 4. Preliminary Earthwork – Phase 1 Figure 5. Impacted Soil Areas – Phase 1 Attachment 1. Historic NCDEQ Correspondence Documents cc: Jim Schenker, Parker Hannifin Corporation Figures SITE Map Location March 2016 60489813 Former Parker Hannifin Corp. Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed Topographic Site Location Map Figure 1 0 2,000 4,000Feet NC SC VA GA TN KY WV USGS Topographic Quadrangle Wake Forest (1983) AECOM1600 Perimeter Park DriveSuite 400Morrisville, NC 27560Phone: (919) 461-1100Fax: (919) 461-1415www.aecom.com . 1:24,000 X: \ D C S \ P r o j e c t s \ L - A E C O M \ G e o m a t i c s \ G I S \ P r o j e c t s \ P \ P a r k e r _ H a n n i f i n \ W a k e _ F o r e s t _ N C \ M X D \ F i g u r e _ 1 - 1 _ S i t e _ L o c a t i o n _ T o p o _ 2 0 1 6 . m x d PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION Former Parker Hannifin Corporation Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Project No.: 60489831 SITE LAYOUT PROPOSED PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT Figure: 2Date: 06/04/2017 FENCE LOCATION GROUNDWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM EFFLUENT PIPESSEWER MANHOLE MW-11DMW-1 MONITORING WELL NOT IMPACTED BY PHASE 1REDEVELOPMENTRECOVERY WELL OR MONITORING WELL POTENTIALLYAFFECTED BY PHASE 1 REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSED PHASE 1 REDEVELOPMENT LEGENDAPPROXIMATE EXTENT OF SOILS ABOVE IHSBPROTECTION OF GROUNDWATER SCREENING LEVELSBUILDING AND CONCRETE REMOVAL AREAADJACENT PARCEL BOUNDARIES SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION Former Parker Hannifin Corporation Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Project No.: 60489831 PROPOSED PHASE 1 DEMOLITION PLAN Figure: 3Date: 06/04/2017 L E G E N D A P P R O X I M A T E E X T E N T O F S O I L S A B O V E I H S B P R O T E C T I O N O F G R O U N D W A T E R S C R E E N I N G L E V E L S A R E A O F C O N C E R N S O L I D W A S T E M A N A G E M E N T U N I T A B B R E V I A T I O N S A O C S W M U D E C O N T A M I N A T I O N D E C O N . S O I L V A P O R E X T R A C T I O N S V E F E N C E L O C A T I O N G R O U N D W A T E R T R E A T M E N T S Y S T E M E F F L U E N T P I P E S P R O P E R T Y L I N E E D G E O F G R A V E L E X I S T I N G T R E E L I N E O V E R H E A D U T I L I T Y W I R E S G R A T E D I N L E T G R A V I T Y S E W E R P R O P O S E D S T A G I N G , P A R K I N G , A N D D E C O N . A R E A S P R O P O S E D H A U L I N G R O U T E W I T H D I R E C T I O N O F T R A F F I C F L O W U T I L I T Y P O L E U T I L I T Y P O L E W I T H D R O P E L E C T R I C A L T R A N S F O R M E R S T O R M D R A I N A G E P I P E S E W E R M A N H O L E P I P E C O N T I N U A T I O N ( E X A C T L O C A T I O N I S U N K N O W N ) A B O V E G R O U N D S V E P I P I N G ( P V C ) U N D E R G R O U N D G R O U N D W A T E R R E C O V E R Y L I N E ( A P P R O X I M A T E ) U N D E R G R O U N D E L E C T R I C L I N E ( A P P R O X I M A T E ) M W - 1 1 D M W - 1 M O N I T O R I N G W E L L N O T I M P A C T E D B Y P H A S E 1 R E D E V E L O P M E N T R E C O V E R Y W E L L O R M O N I T O R I N G W E L L P O T E N T I A L L Y A F F E C T E D B Y P H A S E 1 R E D E V E L O P M E N T B U I L D I N G A N D C O N C R E T E R E M O V A L A R E A C O N S U L T A N T C L I E N T P R O J E C T P R O J E C T N U M B E R S H E E T T I T L E S H E E T N U M B E R Last saved by: PIRESS(2017-06-08) Last Plotted: 2017-06-08Filename: Z:\CAD\PROJECTS\P\PARKER_HANNIFIN\WAKE_FOREST_NC\2016 PROPOSED MIP\C3D\WORKING FILES\FIGURE 4 PRELIMINARY EARTHWORK - IMPACTED AREAS - REDEVELOPMENT OVERLAY.DWG t e l f a x w w w . a e c o m . c o m P R E L I M I N A R Y E A R T H W O R K - P H A S E 1 P A R K E R H A N N I F I N C O R P O R A T I O N W A K E F O R E S T , N O R T H C A R O L I N A A E C O M 1 6 0 0 P e r i m e t e r P a r k D r i v e , S u i t e 4 0 0 M o r r i s v i l l e N C 2 7 5 6 0 9 1 9 . 4 6 1 . 1 4 1 5 9 1 9 . 4 6 1 . 1 4 9 5 6 0 5 3 7 0 1 5 E A R T H W O R K C A L C U L A T I O N S SP MA BW 0 0 5 0 ' 1 0 0 ' F i g u r e 4 M W - 1 1 D M W - 1 4 R W - 4 R E C O V E R Y W E L L M O N I T O R I N G W E L L C O M P L E T E D I N S A P R O L I T E O R P W R M O N I T O R I N G W E L L C O M P L E T E D I N B E D R O C K P O I N T O F C O M P L I A N C E M O N I T O R I N G W E L L C O M P L E T E D I N S A P R O L I T E O R P W R S W 9 S U R F A C E W A T E R S A M P L E L O C A T I O N L E G E N D S I W - 1 S H A L L O W I N J E C T I O N W E L L L O C A T I O N S O I L V A P O R E X T R A C T I O N W E L L P R O P O S E D P H A S E 1 G R A D I N G A R E A A P P R O X I M A T E E X T E N T O F S O I L S A B O V E I H S B P R O T E C T I O N O F G R O U N D W A T E R S C R E E N I N G L E V E L S S W M U 3 1 / 3 3 A O C 3 8 N o r t h e a s t B u i l d i n g A r e a E X I S T I N G G R O U N D W A T E R T R E A T M E N T A N D S V E S Y S T E M N C S R 1 9 2 9 - W A K E U N I O N C H A P E L R O A D T. S . D O U B L E S W I N G G A T E S I W - 1 P O C - 2 A P O C - 2 B M W - 4 M W - 6 D R MW-5 M W - 2 5 M W - 3 M W - 1 P O C - 1 A P O C - 1 B M W - 2 6 R W - 4 R W - 6 P M W - 1 S P M W - 2 S P M W - 1 D P M W - 2 D N O R T H E A S T B U I L D I N G A R E A S W M U 3 1 / 3 3 C O N C R E T E / B R I C K / R O O F I N G M A T E R I A L S F O R M E R M A N U F A C T U R I N G F A C I L I T Y ( D E M O L I S H E D 2 0 0 7 ) C O N C R E T E N O R T H E A S T B U I L D I N G A R E A F E N C E G A T E PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION Former Parker Hannifin Corporation Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Project No.: 60489831.4 IMPACTED SOILS AREA - PHASE 1 Figure: 5Date: 06/04/2017 LEGENDSOURCE: BASE MAP CREATED FROM "BOUNDARY RETRACEMENT" DONE BYMURPHY & SACKS, PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS, 6308 J. RICHARD DR.,RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA, DATED OCTOBER 2002. WELL LOCATIONS WERENOT INCLUDED IN SURVEY, AND ARE APPROXIMATE.NEW FENCE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENTUNIT FORMER LOCATION OFOVERHEAD POWER LINESGROUNDWATER TREATMENTSYSTEM EFFLUENT PIPENOTES:1. APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF SOILS ABOVE IHSBPROTECTION OF GROUNDWATER SCREENINGLEVELS IN PHASE I REDEVELOPMENT = 2,144 SQFT.APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF SOILSABOVE IHSB PROTECTION OFGROUNDWATER SCREENING LEVELSBELOW LAND SURFACEBLS PROPOSED PHASE I DEVELOPMENTBUILDING AND CONCRETEREMOVAL AREA PHASE I POTENTIAL SHALLOWEXCAVATIONSWMU #16 - CLOSED SAND FILTERBEDS SSEWER MANHOLE A O C 3 8 Attachment 1 Parker Hannifin Site Environmental Management Plan APPENDIX B CONSTRUCTION REDEVELOPMENT PLANS Parker Hannifin Site Environmental Management Plan APPENDIX C SOIL ASSESSMENT DATA Ta b l e 1 Su m m a r y o f S o i l A n a l y t i c a l R e s u l t s - V O C s Fo r m e r P a r k e r H a n n a f i n C o r p o r a t i o n F a c i l i t y Wa k e F o r e s t , N C 1 , 1 , 2 , 2 - T E T R A C H L O R O E T H A N E 1 , 1 , 2 - T R I C H L O R O E T H A N E 1 , 1 - D I C H L O R O E T H E N E 1 , 2 , 3 - T r i m e t h y l b e n z e n e 1 , 2 , 4 - T R I M E T H Y L B E N Z E N E 1 , 3 , 5 - T r i m e t h y l b e n z e n e 1 , 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 2 - B u t a n o n e ( M E K ) 2 - P h e n y l b u t a n e 4 - M e t h y l - 2 - p e n t a n o n e A c e t o n e B e n z e n e C h l o r o e t h a n e C h l o r o f o r m C h l o r o m e t h a n e c i s - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e C u m e n e C Y M E N E D i c h l o r o d i f l u o r o m e t h a n e ( C F C - 1 2 ) D i c h l o r o m e t h a n e E t h l y b e n z e n e N A P H T H A L E N E n - B u t y l b e n z e n e n - P r o p y l b e n z e n e t e r t - B u t y l b e n z e n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e T o l u e n e t r a n s - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e Trifluorotrichloroethane (Freon 113)Vinyl chloride Xylenes (Total)SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 1,2-Dichloroethane ISOPROPYLBENZENE P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE ug / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g /k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g u g / k g DP T - 0 3 6 - 8 8 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 6 <0 . 3 6 5 < 0 . 2 7 7 2. 0 1 0 . 9 6 0 J 0 . 7 4 3 J <0 . 2 6 6 < 0 . 2 2 6 5.0 6 J <0 . 2 0 1 < 1 . 8 8 47 . 7 J <0 . 2 7 0 < 0 . 9 4 6 < 0 . 2 2 9 < 0 . 3 7 5 61 6 <0 . 2 4 3 12 9 0 <0 . 7 1 3 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 9 7 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 5 8 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 0 6 0.6 7 8 J 2 . 0 5 J 1 4 . 1 3 0 . 5 <0.365 24.0 <0.698 <1 <0.265 <1 <1 <1 DP T - 0 3 1 0 - 1 2 8 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 6 <0 . 3 6 5 < 0 . 2 7 7 < 0 . 3 0 3 < 0 . 2 8 7 < 0 . 2 1 1 < 0 . 2 6 6 < 0 . 2 2 6 < 4 . 6 8 < 0 . 2 0 1 < 1 . 8 8 34 . 8 J <0 . 2 7 0 < 0 . 9 4 6 0. 4 5 6 J <0 . 3 7 5 11 8 <0 . 2 4 3 5. 8 4 <0 . 7 1 3 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 9 7 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 5 8 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 0 6 0.7 0 8 J 0 . 5 0 6 J 0 . 8 7 5 J 1 1 8 <0.365 2.68 <0.698 <1 <0.265 <1 <1 <1 DP T - 0 3 2 0 - 2 2 8 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 6 <0 . 3 6 5 < 0 . 2 7 7 < 0 . 3 0 3 < 0 . 2 8 7 < 0 . 2 1 1 < 0 . 2 6 6 < 0 . 2 2 6 6.0 7 J <0 . 2 0 1 < 1 . 8 8 30 . 7 J <0 . 2 7 0 < 0 . 9 4 6 < 0 . 2 2 9 < 0 . 3 7 5 1.4 6 <0 . 2 4 3 < 0 . 2 0 4 < 0 . 7 1 3 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 9 7 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 5 8 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 7 6 < 0 . 4 3 4 < 0 . 2 6 4 13 . 5 J <0.365 <0.291 <0.698 <1 <0.265 <1 <1 <1 DP T - 0 5 1 8 - 2 0 8 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 6 <0 . 3 6 5 < 0 . 2 7 7 < 0 . 3 0 3 < 0 . 2 8 7 < 0 . 2 1 1 < 0 . 2 6 6 < 0 . 2 2 6 < 4 . 6 8 < 0 . 2 0 1 < 1 . 8 8 30 . 8 J <0 . 2 7 0 < 0 . 9 4 6 0. 2 6 6 J <0 . 3 7 5 4.3 1 <0 . 2 4 3 < 0 . 2 0 4 < 0 . 7 1 3 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 9 7 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 5 8 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 7 6 < 0 . 4 3 4 < 0 . 2 6 4 7.30 <0.365 <0.291 <0.698 <1 <0.265 <1 <1 <1 DP T - 1 1 0 - 2 8 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 6 3 . 3 6 0 . 4 1 9 J 0 . 3 6 3 J <0 . 2 8 7 < 0 . 2 1 1 < 0 . 2 6 6 0.9 9 8 J 2 8 . 2 <0 . 2 0 1 < 1 . 8 8 14 3 <0 . 2 7 0 < 0 . 9 4 6 < 0 . 2 2 9 < 0 . 3 7 5 23 . 1 <0 . 2 4 3 < 0 . 2 0 4 < 0 . 7 1 3 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 9 7 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 5 8 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 0 6 45 0 0 <0 . 4 3 4 < 0 . 2 6 4 642 <0.365 <0.291 <0.698 <1 <0.265 <1 <1 <1 DP T - 1 1 3 - 5 8 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 6 5 . 4 7 <0 . 2 7 7 < 0 . 3 0 3 < 0 . 2 8 7 < 0 . 2 1 1 < 0 . 2 6 6 0.6 0 2 J 1 8 0 <0 . 2 0 1 6. 5 6 J 7 0 8 1 . 2 8 1 . 2 0 J <0 . 2 2 9 2. 3 8 J 2 . 8 3 <0 . 2 4 3 < 0 . 2 0 4 < 0 . 7 1 3 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 9 7 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 5 8 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 0 6 30 4 0 0 . 9 8 2 J <0 . 2 6 4 129 <0.365 <0.291 <0.698 <1 <0.265 <1 <1 <1 DP T - 1 1 1 0 - 1 2 8 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 6 <0 . 3 6 5 < 0 . 2 7 7 < 0 . 3 0 3 < 0 . 2 8 7 < 0 . 2 1 1 < 0 . 2 6 6 < 0 . 2 2 6 7.3 2 J <0 . 2 0 1 < 1 . 8 8 31 . 0 J <0 . 2 7 0 < 0 . 9 4 6 < 0 . 2 2 9 < 0 . 3 7 5 < 0 . 2 3 5 < 0 . 2 4 3 < 0 . 2 0 4 < 0 . 7 1 3 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 9 7 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 5 8 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 0 6 9. 9 7 J <0 . 4 3 4 < 0 . 2 6 4 < 7 . 2 5 < 0 . 3 6 5 < 0 . 2 9 1 < 0 . 6 9 8 < 1 < 0 . 2 6 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 DP T - 2 3 2 0 - 2 2 8 / 1 9 / 2 0 1 6 <0 . 3 6 5 0.3 6 8 J <0 . 3 0 3 < 0 . 2 8 7 < 0 . 2 1 1 < 0 . 2 6 6 < 0 . 2 2 6 < 4 . 6 8 < 0 . 2 0 1 < 1 . 8 8 16 . 8 J <0 . 2 7 0 < 0 . 9 4 6 1.6 0 J <0 . 3 7 5 13 . 0 <0 . 2 4 3 < 0 . 2 0 4 < 0 . 7 1 3 1. 4 7 J <0 . 2 9 7 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 5 8 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 7 6 < 0 . 4 3 4 0.3 5 7 J 5 6 . 3 <0.365 <0.291 <0.698 <1 <0.265 <1 <1 <1 DP T - 2 4 2 - 4 8 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 6 <0 . 3 6 5 < 0 . 2 7 7 < 0 . 3 0 3 < 0 . 2 8 7 < 0 . 2 1 1 < 0 . 2 6 6 < 0 . 2 2 6 < 4 . 6 8 < 0 . 2 0 1 < 1 . 8 8 10 . 6 J <0 . 2 7 0 < 0 . 9 4 6 < 0 . 2 2 9 < 0 . 3 7 5 0.9 7 0 J <0 . 2 4 3 < 0 . 2 0 4 < 0 . 7 1 3 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 9 7 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 5 8 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 7 6 < 0 . 4 3 4 < 0 . 2 6 4 0.6 1 3 J <0.365 <0.291 <0.698 <1 <0.265 <1 <1 <1 DP T - 2 4 6 - 8 8 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 6 <0 . 3 6 5 < 0 . 2 7 7 < 0 . 3 0 3 < 0 . 2 8 7 < 0 . 2 1 1 < 0 . 2 6 6 < 0 . 2 2 6 < 4 . 6 8 < 0 . 2 0 1 < 1 . 8 8 29 . 0 J <0 . 2 7 0 < 0 . 9 4 6 < 0 . 2 2 9 < 0 . 3 7 5 33 . 8 <0 . 2 4 3 < 0 . 2 0 4 < 0 . 7 1 3 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 9 7 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 5 8 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 0 6 0.5 3 3 J <0 . 4 3 4 0.6 1 3 J 5 7 . 2 <0.365 <0.291 <0.698 <1 <0.265 <1 <1 <1 DP T - 2 4 2 2 - 2 4 8 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 6 <0 . 3 6 5 < 0 . 2 7 7 < 0 . 3 0 3 < 0 . 2 8 7 < 0 . 2 1 1 < 0 . 2 6 6 < 0 . 2 2 6 5.5 2 J <0 . 2 0 1 < 1 . 8 8 28 . 0 J <0 . 2 7 0 < 0 . 9 4 6 < 0 . 2 2 9 < 0 . 3 7 5 3.2 6 <0 . 2 4 3 < 0 . 2 0 4 < 0 . 7 1 3 1. 2 9 J <0 . 2 9 7 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 5 8 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 7 6 < 0 . 4 3 4 < 0 . 2 6 4 18.6 <0.365 <0.291 <0.698 <1 <0.265 <1 <1 <1 DP T - 2 6 2 - 4 8 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 6 <0 . 3 6 5 < 0 . 2 7 7 < 0 . 3 0 3 < 0 . 2 8 7 < 0 . 2 1 1 < 0 . 2 6 6 < 0 . 2 2 6 < 4 . 6 8 < 0 . 2 0 1 < 1 . 8 8 34 . 4 J <0 . 2 7 0 < 0 . 9 4 6 < 0 . 2 2 9 < 0 . 3 7 5 < 0 . 2 3 5 < 0 . 2 4 3 < 0 . 2 0 4 < 0 . 7 1 3 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 9 7 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 5 8 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 7 6 < 0 . 4 3 4 < 0 . 2 6 4 44.4 <0.365 <0.291 <0.698 <1 <0.265 <1 <1 <1 DP T - 2 6 9 - 1 1 8 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 6 <0 . 3 6 5 < 0 . 2 7 7 < 0 . 3 0 3 < 0 . 2 8 7 < 0 . 2 1 1 < 0 . 2 6 6 < 0 . 2 2 6 < 4 . 6 8 < 0 . 2 0 1 < 1 . 8 8 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 2 7 0 < 0 . 9 4 6 < 0 . 2 2 9 < 0 . 3 7 5 < 0 . 2 3 5 < 0 . 2 4 3 < 0 . 2 0 4 < 0 . 7 13 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 9 7 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 5 8 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 7 6 0. 5 3 6 J <0 . 2 6 4 337 <0.365 <0.291 <0.698 <1 <0.265 <1 <1 <1 DP T - 2 6 1 2 - 1 4 8 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 6 <0 . 3 6 5 < 0 . 2 7 7 < 0 . 3 0 3 < 0 . 2 8 7 < 0 . 2 1 1 < 0 . 2 6 6 0.2 3 6 J <4 . 6 8 < 0 . 2 0 1 < 1 . 8 8 14 . 2 J <0 . 2 7 0 < 0 . 9 4 6 < 0 . 2 2 9 < 0 . 3 7 5 < 0 . 2 3 5 < 0 . 2 4 3 < 0 . 2 0 4 < 0 . 7 1 3 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 9 7 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 5 8 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 7 6 0. 4 8 7 J <0 . 2 6 4 71.7 <0.365 <0.291 <0.698 <1 <0.265 <1 <1 <1 DP T - 2 9 2 - 4 8 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 6 <0 . 3 6 5 < 0 . 2 7 7 < 0 . 3 0 3 10 . 1 J 1 4 . 0 J 0 . 9 9 2 J <0 . 2 2 6 < 4 . 6 8 0.4 8 8 J <1 . 8 8 18 . 1 J <0 . 2 7 0 < 0 . 9 4 6 < 0 . 2 2 9 < 0 . 3 7 5 86 . 7 <0 . 2 4 3 0.4 0 0 J <0 . 7 1 3 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 9 7 2.8 6 J 5 . 5 5 J 0 . 3 8 6 J <0 . 2 0 6 35 1 0 0 . 7 9 7 J <0 . 2 6 4 16.5 21.7 5.28 <0.698 <1 <0.265 <1 <1 <1 DP T - 2 9 4 - 6 8 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 6 <0 . 3 6 5 < 0 . 2 7 7 < 0 . 3 0 3 < 0 . 2 8 7 < 0 . 2 1 1 < 0 . 2 6 6 < 0 . 2 2 6 < 4 . 6 8 < 0 . 2 0 1 < 1 . 8 8 26 . 4 J <0 . 2 7 0 < 0 . 9 4 6 < 0 . 2 2 9 < 0 . 3 7 5 < 0 . 2 3 5 < 0 . 2 4 3 < 0 . 2 0 4 < 0 . 7 1 3 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 9 7 < 1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 5 8 < 0 . 2 0 6 < 0 . 2 0 6 50 . 6 <0 . 4 3 4 < 0 . 2 6 4 0.6 0 1 J <0.365 <0.291 <0.698 <1 <0.265 <1 <1 <1 DP T - 3 0 4 - 6 8 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 6 <0 . 3 6 5 < 0 . 2 7 7 < 0 . 3 0 3 < 2 3 0 0 21 0 0 J 8 9 . 1 0 . 3 2 2 J 1 2 . 0 4 1 . 9 <1 . 8 8 79 . 5 <0 . 2 7 0 < 0 . 9 4 6 < 0 . 2 2 9 < 0 . 3 7 5 37 . 9 1 1 . 0 3 5 . 1 3 5 . 3 <1 . 0 0 4. 5 1 7 3 . 7 <2 0 6 0 50 . 2 2 . 8 4 6 7 8 0 J 3 . 7 9 J <0 . 2 6 4 30.1 126000 12.7 26.1 <1 <0.265 <1 <1 <1 DP T - 3 0 1 4 - 1 6 8 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 6 <0 . 3 6 5 < 0 . 2 7 7 < 0 . 3 0 3 < 6 . 0 3 7. 2 9 J 2 . 0 6 0 . 3 8 2 J 7 . 0 9 J 1 . 3 0 <1 . 8 8 28 . 7 J <0 . 2 7 0 < 0 . 9 4 6 < 0 . 2 2 9 < 0 . 3 7 5 7.9 8 0 . 2 7 2 J 0 . 8 1 6 J 9 . 1 7 <1 . 0 0 < 0 . 2 9 7 3.4 2 J <5 . 4 2 1.0 8 <0 . 2 0 6 21 . 0 J 0 . 5 2 2 J <0 . 2 6 4 0.7 7 0 J 6 1 1 4 . 4 0 <0.698 <1 <0.265 <1 <1 <1 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 1 2 - 3 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 < 1 0 J 3 J 6 N A < 1 0 J 3 J 6 < 5 0 J 3 < 1 J 3 J 6 < 5 J 3 < 5 J 3 J 6 < 2 . 5 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 N A N A < 5 J 3 J 6 N A < 1 J 3 J 6 < 5 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 6.1 9 J 3 J 6 <5 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 N A < 1 J 3 J 6 < 3 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 1 5 - 6 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 11 . 8 J <1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 < 1 NA N A <5 NA <1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 N A < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 1 1 8 - 1 9 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 13 . 5 J <1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 < 1 NA N A <5 NA <1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 N A < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 2 1 . 5 - 2 . 5 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 19 . 1 J <1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 < 1 NA N A <5 NA <1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 73 . 6 <5 < 1 < 1 N A < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 2 7 - 8 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 < 5 0 < 1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 < 1 N A N A < 5 N A < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 3.4 9 <5 < 1 < 1 N A < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 2 1 8 - 1 9 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 0 . 4 N A < 1 0 . 4 11 . 9 J <1 . 0 4 < 5 . 2 < 5 . 2 < 2 . 6 < 1 . 0 4 NA N A <5 . 2 NA <1 . 0 4 < 5 . 2 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 0.3 7 4 J <5 . 2 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 N A < 1 . 0 4 < 3 . 1 2 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 3 2 . 5 - 3 . 5 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 < 5 0 < 1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 < 1 N A N A < 5 N A < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 N A < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 3 7 - 8 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 . 0 5 < 1 . 0 5 < 1 . 0 5 < 1 . 0 5 < 1 . 0 5 < 1 . 0 5 < 1 . 0 5 < 1 0 . 5 N A < 1 0 . 5 14 . 1 J <1 . 0 5 < 5 . 2 5 < 5 . 2 5 < 2 . 6 3 < 1 . 0 5 NA N A <5 . 2 5 NA <1 . 0 5 < 5 . 2 5 < 1 . 0 5 < 1 . 0 5 < 1 . 0 5 < 1 . 0 5 < 5 . 2 5 < 1 . 0 5 < 1 . 0 5 N A < 1 . 0 5 < 3 . 1 5 < 1 . 0 5 < 1 . 0 5 < 1 . 0 5 < 1 . 0 5 < 1 . 0 5 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 3 1 7 - 1 8 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 0 . 4 N A < 1 0 . 4 < 5 2 < 1 . 0 4 < 5 . 2 < 5 . 2 < 2 . 6 < 1 . 0 4 N A N A < 5 . 2 N A < 1 . 0 4 < 5 . 2 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1.0 4 < 5 . 2 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 N A < 1 . 0 4 < 3 . 1 2 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 < 1 . 0 4 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 4 3 - 4 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 < 5 0 < 1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 < 1 N A N A < 5 N A < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 N A < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 4 7 - 8 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 10 . 2 J <1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 < 1 NA N A <5 NA <1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 N A < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 4 1 8 - 1 9 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 10 . 5 J <1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 < 1 NA N A <5 NA <1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 N A < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 5 1 - 1 . 5 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 74 . 5 7 3 . 3 4 5 . 6 <1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 14 J <1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 75 . 1 N A N A <5 NA 7 . 5 3 3 9 . 2 2 1 . 6 1 2 . 6 0 . 7 8 J 9 7 0 5 6 . 8 <1 55.8 NA 55.6 43.5 6.08 <1 3.23 14.1 487 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 5 4 . 5 - 5 . 5 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 0. 4 2 5 J 0 . 6 1 6 J 0 . 3 5 J <1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 < 5 0 < 1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 2.7 9 NA N A < 5 N A < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 14 4 0 2 . 0 9 J <1 31 NA < 1 0.837 J <1 <1 <1 <1 <21.5 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 5 B 2 - 3 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 1.1 5 0 . 2 5 2 J <1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 < 5 0 < 1 < 5 0. 2 6 4 J <2 . 5 0.5 2 6 J NA N A < 5 N A < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 40 1 0 <5 < 1 15.1 NA < 1 < 3 0.22 J <1 <1 <1 <22.5 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 5 B 7 - 8 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 28 . 2 J <1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 < 1 NA N A <5 NA <1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 11 . 8 <5 < 1 0.6 6 7 J NA < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 5 B 1 8 - 1 9 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 0 . 6 N A < 1 0 . 6 12 . 8 J <1 . 0 6 < 5 . 3 < 5 . 3 < 2 . 6 5 < 1 . 0 6 NA N A <5 . 3 NA <1 . 0 6 < 5 . 3 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 1 J <5 . 3 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 N A < 1 . 0 6 < 3 . 1 8 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 6 0 . 5 - 1 . 5 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 24 . 8 J <1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 < 1 NA N A <5 NA <1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 14 . 9 <5 < 1 2.02 NA < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 6 7 - 8 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 < 5 0 < 1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 < 1 N A N A < 5 N A < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 0.5 6 8 J <5 < 1 < 1 N A < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 6 1 9 - 2 0 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 17 . 6 J <1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 < 1 NA N A <5 NA <1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 N A < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 7 0 . 5 - 1 . 5 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 J 6 < 1 < 1 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 46 . 2 J <1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 J 3 0.4 3 4 J N A N A <5 NA <1 J 3 J 6 < 5 J 3 < 1 J 3 < 1 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 23 . 9 <5 J 3 J 6 < 1 12 . 6 J 6 NA < 1 < 3 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 < 1 < 1 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 1.2 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 7 7 - 8 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 15 . 9 J <1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 < 1 NA N A <5 NA <1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 N A < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB 3 1 / 3 3 - 7 1 9 - 2 0 1 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 6 <1 . 0 9 < 1 . 0 9 < 1 . 0 9 < 1 . 0 9 < 1 . 0 9 < 1 . 0 9 < 1 . 0 9 < 1 0 . 9 N A < 1 0 . 9 13 J <1 . 0 9 < 5 . 4 5 < 5 . 4 5 < 2 . 7 3 < 1 . 0 9 NA N A <5 . 4 5 NA <1 . 0 9 < 5 . 4 5 < 1 . 0 9 < 1 . 0 9 < 1 . 0 9 < 1 . 0 9 < 5 . 4 5 < 1 . 0 9 < 1 . 0 9 N A < 1 . 0 9 < 3 . 2 7 < 1 . 0 9 < 1 . 0 9 < 1 . 0 9 < 1 . 0 9 < 1 . 0 9 SB N E B A - 1 3 - 4 1 0 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 6 <1 2.1 4 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 < 4 2 5 0 < 1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 12 3 NA N A < 5 N A < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 33 <5 1.8 6 2 4 0 0 NA 1.24 <3 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SB N E B A - 1 5 . 5 - 6 . 5 1 0 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 6 <1 8 0 < 1 8 0 < 1 8 0 < 1 8 0 < 1 8 0 < 1 8 0 < 1 8 0 < 1 8 0 0 N A < 1 8 0 0 < 9 0 0 0 < 1 8 0 < 9 0 0 < 9 0 0 < 4 5 0 11 7 0 NA N A < 9 0 0 N A < 1 8 0 < 9 0 0 < 1 8 0 < 1 8 0 < 1 8 0 11 5 0 <9 0 0 < 1 8 0 45 7 0 0 NA < 1 8 0 < 5 4 0 < 1 8 0 < 1 8 0 < 1 8 0 < 1 8 0 < 1 8 0 SB N E B A - 1 1 0 - 1 1 1 0 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 6 <1 0.6 5 5 J <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 17 J <1 < 5 1.1 2 J <2 . 5 24 . 5 N A N A <5 NA <1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 0. 2 8 J <5 < 1 248 NA < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB N E B A - 1 1 5 - 1 6 1 0 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 6 <1 1.1 8 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 < 5 0 < 1 < 5 1.1 6 J <2 . 5 13 . 2 NA N A < 5 N A < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 0.3 6 6 J <5 < 1 98.7 NA < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB N E B A - 1 1 6 - 1 7 1 0 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 6 <1 0.8 1 3 J <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 10 . 6 J <1 < 5 0. 8 7 5 J <2 . 5 11 . 5 N A N A <5 NA <1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 5 < 1 36.8 NA < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB N E B A - 1 2 2 - 2 3 1 0 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 6 <1 . 0 8 1.1 9 <1 . 0 8 < 1 . 0 8 < 1 . 0 8 < 1 . 0 8 < 1 . 0 8 < 1 0 . 8 N A < 1 0 . 8 < 5 9 . 5 < 1 . 0 8 < 5 . 4 0. 6 3 9 J <2 . 7 6.4 2 NA N A < 5 . 4 N A < 1 . 0 8 < 5 . 4 < 1 . 0 8 < 1 . 0 8 < 1 . 0 8 < 1 . 0 8 < 5 . 4 < 1 . 0 8 24.6 NA < 1 . 0 8 < 3 . 2 4 < 1 . 0 8 < 1 . 0 8 < 1 . 0 8 < 1 . 0 8 < 1 . 0 8 SB N E B A - 1 2 7 - 2 8 1 0 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 6 <1 0. 8 4 J <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 < 5 2 . 5 < 1 < 5 0. 8 8 2 J <2 . 5 10 . 6 NA N A < 5 N A < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 5 < 1 120 NA < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB N E B A - 2 3 - 4 1 0 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 < 5 0 < 1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 95 . 1 NA N A < 5 N A < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 5.1 1 <5 0.5 8 7 J 1 1 9 NA < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB N E B A - 2 7 - 8 1 0 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 3. 1 5 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 9.5 9 J NA < 1 0 < 1 8 0 0 < 1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 23 4 0 NA N A < 5 N A < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 0.3 4 7 J 1 . 4 2 J 1 2 . 2 3 9 . 4 NA 839 <3 <1 0.485 J <1 0.219 J <1 SB N E B A - 2 1 5 - 1 6 1 0 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 6 <1 0.9 8 4 J <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 11 . 3 J <1 < 5 2.2 3 J <2 . 5 73 . 1 N A N A <5 NA <1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 0.3 0 5 J <5 1.4 9 1 3 5 NA 0.785 J <3 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SB N E B A - 3 4 - 5 1 0 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 0.5 7 1 J <1 0.3 8 1 J <1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 < 1 9 3 0 < 1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 32 5 NA N A < 5 N A < 1 1.3 1 J <1 < 1 < 1 10 . 7 0 . 5 0 2 J 3 . 0 2 1 0 4 0 NA < 3 8 . 5 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB N E B A - 3 6 - 7 1 0 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 6 <1 0.3 4 8 J <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 12 . 1 NA < 1 0 < 1 9 3 0 < 1 < 5 0. 4 1 3 J <2 . 5 60 . 5 NA N A < 5 N A < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 3.1 1 <5 1.6 2 6 9 6 NA < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB N E B A - 3 1 8 - 1 9 1 0 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 6 <1 0.4 3 2 J <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 < 5 0 < 1 < 5 0. 3 6 4 J <2 . 5 9.3 6 NA N A < 5 N A < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 5 < 1 35.1 NA < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB N E B A - 4 1 - 2 1 0 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 75 . 4 <1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 4.8 N A N A <5 NA <1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 5 < 1 4.65 NA < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB N E B A - 7 1 - 2 1 0 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0. 2 8 J <1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 < 5 0 < 1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 9.7 3 NA N A < 5 N A < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 5 < 1 2.43 NA 0.541 J <3 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SB N E B A - 9 1 - 2 1 0 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0 N A < 1 0 40 . 2 J <1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 < 1 NA N A <5 NA <1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 5 < 1 < 1 N A < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 SB N E B A - 1 0 0 . 5 - 1 1 0 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 6 <1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 4.8 4 J NA < 1 0 15 9 <1 < 5 < 5 < 2 . 5 < 1 NA N A <5 NA <1 < 5 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 0. 8 2 3 J <1 9.71 NA < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 No t e s < - c o n s t i t u e n t w a s n o t d e t e c t e d a b o v e t h e l a b o r a t o r y r e p o r t i n g l i m i t ( R L ) J - R e p o r t e d d e t e c t i o n i s a b o v e M D L a n d b e l o w R L . J3 - T h e a s s o c i a t e d b a t c h Q C w a s o u t s i d e t h e e s t a b l i s h e d q u a l i t y c o n t r o l r a n g e f o r p r e c i s i o n . J6 - T h e s a m p l e m a t r i x i n t e r f e r e d w i t h t h e a b i l i t y t o m a k e a n y a c c u r a t e d e t e r m i n a t i o n ; s p i k e v a l u e i s l o w ft b g s - f e e t b e l o w g r o u n d s u r f a c e ug / k g - m i c r o g r a m p e r k i l o g r a m On l y d e t e c t e d c o m p o u n d s s h o w n i n t a b l e Sa m p l e Lo c a t i o n Sa m p l e D e p t h (f t b g s ) Sa m p l e D a t e M W - 2 5 M W - 2 6 2 7 0 3 5 0 4 7 0 1 4 0 < 6 . 4 < 6 . 4 < 5 . 6 1 6 1 , 1 0 0 < 7 0 1 , 5 0 0 9 6 5 6 1 7 3 , 7 0 0 5 6 , 0 0 0 5 , 3 0 0 1 4 , 0 0 0 < 6 . 6 < 6 . 6 3 0 3 9 5 , 0 0 0 3 5 0 < 6 . 2 1 3 1 1 < 6 . 3 3 1 - 0 2 - 1 0 ( 1 ' ) 3 1 - 0 2 - 0 1 ( 0 . 5 ' ) 3 1 - 0 3 - 0 2 ( 3 ' ) 3 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 ( 1 ' ) 3 1 - 0 2 - 1 2 ( 1 . 2 ' ) 3 1 - 0 2 - 1 8 ( 1 ' ) 3 1 - 0 2 - 1 1 ( 1 . 2 ' ) 3 1 - 0 3 - 1 1 ( 3 ' ) 3 1 - 0 2 - 1 7 ( 1 ' ) 3 1 - 0 3 - 1 6 ( 3 ' ) 3 1 - 0 2 - 1 6 ( 1 ' ) 3 1 - 0 3 - 1 5 ( 3 ' ) 3 1 - 0 2 - 1 5 ( 1 ' ) 3 1 - 0 2 - 0 9 ( 3 ' ) 3 1 - 0 2 - 0 8 ( 1 ' ) 3 1 - 0 3 - 1 0 ( 3 ' ) 3 1 - 0 2 - 1 4 ( 3 ' ) 3 1 - 0 2 - 1 3 ( 1 . 2 ' ) 3 1 - 0 3 - 0 7 ( 3 ' ) 3 1 - 0 2 - 0 7 ( 1 ' ) < 6 , 2 0 0 1 6 0 , 0 0 0 2 , 9 0 0 1 , 3 0 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 0 < 6 6 2 , 7 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 2 , 6 0 0 1 4 2 9 1 8 , 0 0 0 1 1 , 0 0 0 4 7 , 0 0 0 2 2 , 0 0 0 3 1 / 3 3 - B 1 0 3 1 / 3 3 - B 7 3 1 / 3 3 - B 9 3 1 / 3 3 - B 1 1 3 1 / 3 3 - B 8 3 1 / 3 3 - B 3 3 1 / 3 3 - B 1 3 1 / 3 3 - B 4 3 1 / 3 3 - B 5 3 1 / 3 3 - B 6 6 < 5 . 6 4 3 8 6 2 1 1 6 0 1 3 , 0 0 0 3 , 4 0 0 5 . 9 3 4 < 4 . 9 < 4 . 9 < 5 . 2 < 5 . 2 7 2 0 1 7 4 1 2 3 8 . 3 1 6 < 5 . 1 < 5 . 1 6 4 1 5 0 P O G P S R G ( P C E & T C E ) 3 1 / 3 3 - B 2 3 , 5 1 0 1 6 . 5 D P T - 2 9 ( 2 - 4 ' ) 6 . 1 9 J 3 J 6 < 1 J 3 J 6 S B 3 1 / 3 3 - 1 1 2 . 6 J 6 1 4 . 9 2 . 0 2 S B 3 1 / 3 3 - 6 6 , 7 8 0 J 3 0 . 1 D P T - 3 0 < 1 < 1 S B 3 1 / 3 3 - 4 9 7 0 5 5 . 8 S B 3 1 / 3 3 - 5 ( 1 - 1 . 5 ' ) 7 3 . 6 < 1 S B 3 1 / 3 3 - 2 < 1 < 1 S B 3 1 / 3 3 - 3 4 , 0 1 0 1 5 . 1 S B 3 1 / 3 3 - 5 B 1 , 4 4 0 3 1 S B 3 1 / 3 3 - 5 ( 4 . 5 - 5 . 5 ' ) 5 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 1 J D P T - 2 9 ( 4 - 6 ' ) 2 3 . 9 S B 3 1 / 3 3 - 7 Former Parker Hannifin Corporation Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Project No.: 60489831 SWMU 31/33 2016 AND HISTORICAL SOIL PCE & TCE ANALYTICAL RESULTS MAP (0-6 FT BGS) Figure: 2Date: 06/15/2017 MW-26 MW-25 LEGENDMONITORING WELL COMPLETEDIN SAPROLITE OR PWRMONITORING WELL COMPLETED INBEDROCKSOURCE: BASE MAP CREATED FROM "BOUNDARY RETRACEMENT" DONE BYMURPHY & SACKS, PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS, 6308 J. RICHARD DR.,RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA, DATED OCTOBER 2002. WELL LOCATIONS WERENOT INCLUDED IN SURVEY, AND ARE APPROXIMATE.PCE & TCE POG PSRGEXCEEDANCE ISOCONCENTRATIONCONTOUR (ug/kg) (DASHED WHEREINFERRED)FENCE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITNOTES:1. SOIL RESULTS REPORTED IN MICROGRAMS PERKILOGRAM (ug/kg)2. SEE DATA TABLE ON FIGURE FOR SAMPLE DATES.3. THE AREA FOR THE PROTECTION OFGROUNDWATER (POG) PRELIMINARY SOILREMEDIATION GOAL (PSRG) PCE AND TCEEXCEEDANCE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR ISAPPROXIMATELY 4,630 SQ. FT.4. PCE & TCE DID NOT EXCEED THE INDUSTRIALPSRG IN SWWU 31/33 IN 2016 SAMPLES.HISTORICAL SOIL SAMPLE 31-02-12 (1.2') LOCATION (DATES VARY)31/33-B6HISTORICAL SOIL SAMPLELOCATION (NOV. 2005)SAMPLE KEY:4,01015.12016 PCECONCENTRATION(ug/kg)2016 TCECONCENTRATION(ug/kg)SB31/33-5B SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION(AUG. & OCT. 2016)31/33-B6<5.2<5.2HISTORIC PCECONCENTRATION (ug/kg)HISTORIC TCECONCENTRATION (ug/kg)SB31/33-5BABBREVIATIONS:J = REPORTED DETECTION IS ABOVE THE METHOD DETECTION LIMIT AND BELOW REPORTING LIMITJ3 = THE ASSOCIATED BATCH QUALITY CONTROL (QC) WAS OUTSIDE THE ESTABLISHED QC RANGE FOR PRECISIONJ6 = THE SAMPLE MATRIX INTERFERED WITH THE ABILITY TO MAKE ANY ACCURATE DETERMINATION; SPIKE VALUE IS LOWfeet bgs = FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACEug/kg = MICROGRAM PER KILOGRAMmg/kg = MILLIGRAM PER KILOGRAM 3 8 - B 6 < 6 . 0 < 6 . 0 3 8 - B 5 3 8 - B 4 3 8 - B 3 3 8 - B 2 3 8 - B 1 G P - 2 / A O C - 2 G P - 8 G P - 1 / A O C - 1 1 2 1 8 0 < 5 3 2 0 , 0 0 0 < 4 . 7 < 4 . 7 2 , 4 0 0 5 4 0 6 . 4 2 5 3 5 , 0 0 0 2 4 0 , 0 0 0 < 5 . 4 < 5 . 4 T 9 - B 1 5 , 4 7 0 7 4 , 7 0 0 < 5 < 5 F O R M E R P A R K I N G A R E A Former Parker Hannifin Corporation Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Project No.: 60489831 AOC 38 HISTORICAL 2016 AND HISTORICAL SOIL PCE & TCE ANALYTICAL RESULTS MAP (0-6 FT BGS) Figure: 3Date: 06/14/2017 LEGENDSOURCE: BASE MAP CREATED FROM "BOUNDARY RETRACEMENT" DONE BYMURPHY & SACKS, PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS, 6308 J. RICHARD DR.,RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA, DATED OCTOBER 2002. WELL LOCATIONS WERENOT INCLUDED IN SURVEY, AND ARE APPROXIMATE.PCE & TCE POG PSRGISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR(ug/kg) (DASHED WHERE INFERRED)NOTES:1. SOIL RESULTS REPORTED IN MICROGRAMS PERKILOGRAM (ug/kg)2. SEE DATA TABLE ON FIGURE FOR SAMPLE DATES.3. THE AREA FOR THE PROTECTION OFGROUNDWATER (POG) PRELIMINARY SOILREMEDIATION GOAL (PSRG) PCE AND TCEISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR IS 1,454 SQ. FT.3. THE AREA FOR THE INDUSTRIAL PRELIMINARYSOIL REMEDIATION GOAL (PSRG) TCEISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR IS 240 SQ. FT.4. PCE DID NOT EXCEED THE INDUSTRIAL PSRG INAOC 38.38-B1HISTORICAL SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION (NOV. 2005)GP-6T9-B1 GP-2/AOC-2SOIL BORING (DECEMBER 1994)SOIL BORING (GP SAMPLES)(AUGUST 1995)SOIL BORING (AOC SAMPLES)(NOVEMBER 2003)38-B1 SAMPLE KEY<4.7<4.7HISTORIC PCECONCENTRATION (ug/kg)HISTORIC TCECONCENTRATION (ug/kg)TCE INDUSTRIAL PSRGISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR(ug/kg) (DASHED WHERE INFERRED)4,01015.12016 PCECONCENTRATION(ug/kg)2016 TCECONCENTRATION(ug/kg)SB31/33-5BABBREVIATIONS:feet bgs = FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACEug/kg = MICROGRAM PER KILOGRAM SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION(AUG. 2016)SB31/33-5B E X I S T I N G G R O U N D W A T E R T R E A T M E N T A N D S V E S Y S T E M T . S . N E 1 3 N E 1 N E 2 N E 2 0 N E 1 7 N E 1 1 N E 6 N E 8 N E 7 N E 9 N E 1 2 N E 1 0 N E 4 0 N E 3 8 N E 4 1 N E 3 9 N E 3 7 N E 3 6 N E 5 0 N E 4 9 N E 3 5 N E 3 4 N E 2 2 N E 6 6 N E 4 8 N E 4 7 N E 4 6 N E 4 5 N E 4 2 N E 5 1 N E 5 3 N E 6 1 N E 5 4 N E 5 5 N E 5 6 N E 5 7 P R - 4 P R - 5 P R - 2 P R - 1 P R - 6 P R - 8 P R - 7 N E 6 4 N E 6 5 N E 6 2 N E 5 2 N E 5 9 - 1 N E 6 3 N E 2 6 N E 2 8 N E 2 1 N E 3 2 N E 2 4 N E 2 5 N E 2 3 N E 1 9 N E 3 3 N E 5 P R - 3 N E 3 1 2 , 0 0 0 1 , 3 0 0 N E 2 9 8 7 0 P R - 9 2 4 0 7 , 7 0 0 7 , 4 0 0 4 3 0 3 7 0 1 8 0 5 6 8 8 3 6 . 4 1 , 2 0 0 N E 6 7 - 1 2 3 1 4 N E 1 5 6 4 4 8 0 1 4 0 N E 1 6 7 . 3 2 0 0 7 3 2 0 1 , 9 0 0 2 9 0 2 , 1 0 0 1 3 1 , 0 0 0 5 . 5 U 6 . 7 U N S 7 . 7 5 . 9 U 1 0 5 . 5 U 6 . 1 U 5 . 7 U 5 . 2 U 5 . 9 U 5 . 8 U 1 8 0 6 . 2 U 6 . 6 U N S N S 5 U 5 . 5 U N S N S 5 . 7 U 5 . 1 U 1 3 0 6 . 2 U 6 . 6 U 1 0 5 . 8 U 6 U N S N S N S 6 . 6 N S N S N S 5 3 0 N S 5 . 5 U 5 . 5 U N E 5 8 - 4 5 . 6 U 4 8 U 4 . 7 U N E 2 7 N S N E 1 8 3 8 0 0 ( I N D U S T R I A L P S R G ) 1 8 ( P O G P S R G ) N E 3 0 1 6 0 N E 4 4 N E 4 3 5 . 7 U N E 3 1 5 6 0 N E - B 7 N E - B 8 5 . 4 U 1 3 0 7 8 1 6 5 . 1 U 5 . 5 U 6 . 1 U S B N E B A - 2 1 1 9 S B N E B A - 1 4 5 , 7 0 0 S B N E B A - 3 9 . 7 1 S B N E B A - 4 4 . 6 5 S B N E B A - 5 N S S B N E B A - 6 N S S B N E B A - 8 N S 1 , 0 4 0 D P T - 2 4 D P T - 4 < 1 0 . 6 1 3 J N S S B N E B A - 7 2 . 4 3 1 8 ( P O G P S R G ) S B N E B A - 1 0 Former Parker Hannifin Corporation Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Project No.: 60489831 NEBA 2016 AND HISTORICAL SOIL TCE ANALYTICAL RESULTS (0-6 FT BGS) WITH PHASE 1 REDEVELOPMENT OVERLAY Figure: 4Date: 06/15/2017 LEGENDSOURCE: BASE MAP CREATED FROM "BOUNDARY RETRACEMENT" DONE BYMURPHY & SACKS, PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS, 6308 J. RICHARD DR.,RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA, DATED OCTOBER 2002. WELL LOCATIONS WERENOT INCLUDED IN SURVEY, AND ARE APPROXIMATE.TCE POG EXCEEDANCEISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR(ug/kg) (DASHED WHEREINFERRED)FENCE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENTUNITGROUNDWATER TREATMENTSYSTEM EFFLUENT PIPENOTES:1.SOIL RESULTS REPORTED IN MICROGRAMSPER KILOGRAM (ug/kg)2.SEE DATA TABLE ON FIGURE FOR SAMPLEDATES.3.NS = NOT SAMPLED4.THE AREA FOR THE PROTECTION OFGROUNDWATER (POG) PRELIMINARY SOILREMEDIATION GOAL (PSRG)ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOURS IS 15,800SQ. FT.5.THE AREA FOR THE INDUSTRIALPRELIMINARY SOIL REMEDIATION GOAL(PSRG) ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR IS1,100 SQ. FT.NE-1NEBA SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION(HISTORIC)TCE INDUSTRIAL PSRGEXCEEDANCEISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR(ug/kg)NEBA CONFIRMATION SAMPLELOCATION (HISTORIC)NE-B6 PHASE 1 - PROPOSEDREDEVELOPMENTSAMPLE KEY:15.12016 TCECONCENTRATION(ug/kg)SB31/33-5B SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION(AUG. & OCT. 2016)NE-B75.5 UHISTORIC TCECONCENTRATION (ug/kg)SB31/33-5BABBREVIATIONS:J = REPORTED DETECTION IS ABOVE THE METHODDETECTION LIMIT AND BELOW REPORTING LIMITfeet bgs = FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACEug/kg = MICROGRAM PER KILOGRAM Parker Hannifin Site Environmental Management Plan APPENDIX D GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER ASSESSMENT DATA Environment Submitted to Parker Hannifin Cleveland, OH Submitted by AECOM Raleigh, NC April 2017 60489813.3 Second 2016 Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation System Effectiveness Report Former Parker Hannifin Facility EPA ID No. NCD-002-591-014 Wake Forest, North Carolina AECOM Environment 60489813.3 April 2017 Tables Table 1-1 Groundwater Monitoring Plan - February/March 2016 First 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Report Former Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Well Well Type VOCs Metals 1-4, Dioxane Total Organic Carbon Field Parameters MW-3 CA 1 1 1 1 MW-4 CA 1 1 1 1 MW-5 other 1 MW-6 CA 1 1 1 1 MW-6D CA 1 1 1 1 MW-6DR CA 1 1 1 1 MW-6DR3 CA 1 1 1 1 MW-7 CA 1 1 1 1 MW-8 CA 1 1 1 1 MW-8D CA 1 1 1 1 MW-8DR CA 1 1 1 1 MW-9 CA 1 1 1 1 MW-15 other 1 MW-21 CA 1 1 1 1 MW-21D CA 1 1 1 1 MW-22 other 1 MW-23 other 1 MW-25 other 1 MW-27 other 1 MW-28 other 1 MW-31 other 1 MW-38 other 1 1 RW-4 RW 1 1 1 1 RW-6 RW 1 1 1 1 RW-19 RW 1 1 1 POC-1A POC 1 1 1 1 POC-1B POC 1 1 1 1 POC-2A POC 1 1 1 1 POC-2B POC 1 1 1 1 PMW-1D PMW 1 1 1 PMW-2S PMW 1 1 1 SIW-1 INJ 1 1 1 DIW-1 INJ 1 1 1 WSW-Andrews WSW 1 WSW-Perry WSW 1 SW-8 SW 1 SW-9 SW 1 SW-10 SW 1 SW-11 SW 1 SW-12 SW 1 SW-14 SW 1 SW-15 SW 1 SW-16 SW 1 SW-17 SW 1 QA/QC other 3 47 17 20 6 25 Notes:POC - point of compliance RW - recovery wells PMW - performance monitoring well Other - other recommended monitoring well INJ - injection well WSW- water supply well VOCs - volatile organic compounds PCBs - polychlorinated biphenyls Metals:- Cr - chromium, Ni - nickel SW - Surface Water QA/QC - quality assurance / quality control samplesCA - corrective action effectiveness wellsField Parameters: Water level, dissolved oxygen (DO), oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), pH, temperature, and turbidity. Totals AECOM Table 2-1 Monitoring Well Construction Information and Groundwater Elevations Second 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Report Former Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Well Date Gauged Water Level Below TOC (feet) Measuring Point Elevation at TOC (feet MSL) Groundwater Elevation (feet MSL) Total Well Depth (feet) MW-1 8/23/2016 398.85 36.49 362.36 43.60 MW-2 8/23/2016 394.01 31.20 362.81 44.12 MW-3 8/23/2016 393.58 31.10 362.48 55.70 MW-4 8/23/2016 395.65 33.82 361.83 39.30 8/23/2016 394.61 35.00 359.61 39.30 10/5/2016 394.61 35.30 359.31 39.34 MW-6 8/23/2016 385.47 25.90 359.57 45.64 MW-6D 8/23/2016 385.58 34.32 351.26 69.20 MW-6DR 8/23/2016 387.07 28.37 358.70 103.90 MW-6DR3 8/23/2016 387.95 35.10 352.85 154.10 8/23/2016 354.45 8.88 345.57 10.00 10/5/2016 354.45 9.54 344.91 10.02 MW-8 8/23/2016 357.87 13.90 343.97 17.20 MW-8D 8/23/2016 358.14 13.50 344.64 67.20 MW-8DR 8/23/2016 358.41 16.82 341.59 92.20 MW-11 8/23/2016 384.69 27.70 356.99 35.00 MW-11D 8/23/2016 384.79 28.12 356.67 67.20 MW-12 8/23/2016 386.75 33.70 353.05 38.02 MW-13 8/23/2016 377.93 26.95 350.98 34.65 MW-14 8/23/2016 377.93 25.30 352.63 26.65 8/23/2016 369.88 22.11 347.77 29.87 10/5/2016 369.88 22.20 347.68 29.87 MW-16 8/23/2016 372.94 21.60 351.34 24.05 MW-17 8/23/2016 357.10 11.15 345.95 17.00 MW-18 8/23/2016 394.33 32.90 361.43 40.50 MW-18D 8/23/2016 397.04 46.60 350.44 105.50 MW-20 8/23/2016 396.11 35.55 360.56 46.40 MW-21 8/23/2016 339.38 4.20 335.18 20.00 MW-21D 8/23/2016 340.07 11.20 328.87 142.32 8/23/2016 382.10 24.70 357.40 38.35 10/5/2016 382.10 25.30 356.80 38.35 8/23/2016 361.41 18.67 342.74 28.50 10/5/2016 361.41 18.60 342.81 28.50 MW-24 8/23/2016 395.12 36.05 359.07 128.00 8/23/2016 395.42 34.32 361.10 45.45 10/5/2016 395.42 34.65 360.77 48.45 8/23/2016 390.56 30.72 359.84 43.72 10/5/2016 390.56 30.32 360.24 43.72 8/23/2016 383.14 30.55 352.59 46.90 10/5/2016 383.14 31.00 352.14 46.90 MW-29 8/23/2016 376.32 25.92 350.40 37.20 MW-31 10/5/2016 391.26 33.32 357.94 49.19 MW-32 8/23/2016 375.67 20.82 354.85 62.55 MW-33 8/23/2016 382.54 31.55 350.99 40.15 MW-34 8/23/2016 383.07 36.80 346.27 84.00 MW-35R 8/23/2016 376.99 28.80 348.19 32.85 MW-36 8/23/2016 391.26 29.58 361.68 40.10 MW-37 8/23/2016 395.01 35.45 359.56 39.51 MW-38 8/23/2016 335.10 15.60 319.50 32.81 MW-39 8/23/2016 352.05 13.70 338.35 26.25 MW-39D 8/23/2016 352.02 12.35 339.67 69.90 MW-40 8/23/2016 350.10 14.00 336.10 32.60 MW-40D 8/23/2016 350.54 14.30 336.24 61.70 MW-41 8/23/2016 371.79 17.35 354.44 28.60 PMW-1D 8/23/2016 395.54 36.55 358.99 77.65 PMW-1S 8/23/2016 395.15 33.90 361.25 43.32 PMW-2D 8/23/2016 395.37 34.50 360.87 73.34 PMW-2S 8/23/2016 394.97 33.86 361.11 43.89 POC-1A 8/23/2016 393.72 30.95 362.77 41.92 POC-1B 8/23/2016 393.44 30.91 362.53 44.53 POC-2A 8/23/2016 395.30 33.15 362.15 47.00 POC-2B 8/23/2016 395.67 33.76 361.91 65.30 POC-2B 10/5/2016 395.67 34.00 361.67 65.30 RW-19 8/23/2016 356.99 91.47 265.52 163.50 RW-4 8/23/2016 393.87 31.90 361.97 78.00 RW-6 8/23/2016 388.02 21.94 366.08 65.08 DIW-1 8/23/2016 396.50 35.37 361.13 86.20 SIW-1 8/23/2016 395.44 34.20 361.24 38.28 Notes: MSL - Mean Sea Level TOC - Top of Casing MW-28 MW-5 MW-7 MW-15 MW-22 MW-23 MW-25 MW-27 AECOM Table 2-2 Field Indicator Parameters Second 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Report Former Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Conductivity DO ORP pH Temperature Turbidity mS/cm mg/L mV SU C NTU MW-3 8/25/2016 0.142 9.09 36.5 5.75 20.74 9.60 MW-4 8/25/2016 0.070 1.15 70.7 5.82 22.87 9.99 MW-5 10/5/2016 0.125 0.41 82.5 5.93 17.08 -- MW-6 8/25/2016 0.060 6.02 55.0 5.10 18.66 9.40 MW-6D 8/25/2016 0.681 8.33 64.3 6.75 18.21 4.59 MW-6DR 8/25/2016 0.391 1.95 39.8 6.71 17.38 1.35 MW-6DR3 8/25/2016 0.186 4.62 53.6 7.75 18.48 2.37 MW-7 10/5/2016 MW-8 8/24/2016 0.064 0.42 19.9 5.21 18.41 2.43 MW-8D 8/24/2016 0.164 1.23 79.7 6.93 19.06 1.03 MW-8DR 8/24/2016 0.348 0.59 7.3 6.52 17.54 6.91 MW-15 10/5/2016 0.141 2.41 113.0 5.70 16.77 -- MW-21 8/24/2016 0.096 0.54 80.8 5.68 19.50 7.62 MW-21D 8/24/2016 0.151 2.45 69.9 7.00 18.78 7.43 MW-22 10/5/2016 0.120 2.99 118.2 5.73 16.94 -- MW-23 10/5/2016 0.101 0.39 154.1 5.60 19.43 -- MW-25 10/5/2016 0.118 6.02 76.9 6.07 18.47 -- MW-27 10/5/2016 0.101 4.52 102.3 5.42 16.39 -- MW-28 10/5/2016 0.098 6.30 114.6 5.32 15.99 -- MW-31 10/5/2016 0.071 6.01 121.7 5.31 17.98 -- MW-38 8/23/2016 0.296 2.96 91.0 5.87 16.78 -- PMW-1D 8/25/2016 1.138 0.61 -84.5 6.58 22.15 -- PMW-2S 8/24/2016 0.230 1.08 -70.8 6.07 19.78 -- POC-1A 8/24/2016 0.094 5.20 49.0 5.18 19.53 9.04 POC-1B 8/24/2016 0.148 4.51 61.0 7.27 20.73 0.99 POC-2A 8/24/2016 0.232 0.73 -40.7 6.18 19.00 8.67 POC-2B 8/25/2016 3.946 0.29 -103.3 6.23 23.21 9.61 POC-2B 10/5/2016 2.239 0.82 32.9 5.86 18.40 3.99 RW-19 8/23/2016 0.150 4.85 103.0 5.93 16.78 -- RW-4 8/24/2016 0.191 0.13 -78.3 5.77 18.61 3.21 RW-6 8/24/2016 0.560 0.16 -78.9 6.56 19.45 8.65 DIW-1 8/24/2016 26.992 0.16 -91.4 7.67 28.39 -- SIW-1 8/24/2016 0.150 1.72 20.9 5.91 19.44 -- Notes: C - Degrees Celsius DO - Dissolved Oxygen mg/L - milligrams per liter mS/cm - milliseimens per centimeter mV - millivolts NTU - Nephelometric Turbidity Units ORP - Oxidation-Reduction Potential SU - Standard Units Well Sample Date Not enough water to purge AECOM Ta b l e 3 - 1 Su m m a r y o f O r g a n i c A n a l y t i c a l R e s u l t s - R C R A P e r m i t P a r a m e t e r s f o r S i t e W e l l s Se c o n d 2 0 1 6 G r o u n d w a t e r M o n i t o r i n g R e p o r t Fo r m e r P a r k e r H a n n i f i n F a c i l i t y Wa k e F o r e s t , N o r t h C a r o l i n a Ac e t o n e B e n z e n e Br o m o - di c h l o r o m e t h a n e Di b r o m o - ch l o r o m e t h a n e Ca r b o n Di s u l f i d e Ch l o r o f o r m ci s - 1 , 2 - D C E Di c h l o r o - di f l u o r o m e t h a n e MEK P C E µg / L µ g / L µ g / L µ g / L µ g / L µ g / L µ g / L µ g / L µ g / L µ g / L 60 0 0 1 0 . 6 0 . 4 7 0 0 7 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 . 7 MW - 3 8 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 4 . 6 5 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 < 0 . 3 7 2 MW - 3 D U P 0 3 8 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 5 . 4 3 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 < 0 . 3 7 2 MW - 4 8 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 5. 3 2 J <0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 7 . 1 9 J 12 5 0 J <0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 34.0 J MW - 5 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 0 . 4 5 6 J < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 3.78 MW - 6 8 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 1 . 8 9 J 61 2 J <0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 5.61 J MW - 6 D 8 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 1 . 0 2 J 26 4 0 <0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 1.68 MW - 6 D D U P 0 2 8 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 1 3 . 7 J < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 1 . 3 9 J 25 0 0 <0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 1.36 MW - 6 D R 8 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 1 . 2 9 J 27 4 0 <0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 3.72 MW - 6 D R 3 8 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 0 . 6 2 5 J 1 . 6 9 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 < 0 . 3 7 2 MW - 7 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 5 8 . 1 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 < 0 . 3 7 2 MW - 8 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 4 . 1 9 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 4.72 MW - 8 D 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 0 . 4 9 9 J < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 < 0 . 3 7 2 MW - 8 D R 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 8 . 0 9 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 2.4 MW - 1 5 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 1 8 . 5 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 5.64 MW - 2 1 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 < 0 . 2 6 0 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 < 0 . 3 7 2 MW - 2 1 D 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 < 0 . 2 6 0 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 < 0 . 3 7 2 MW - 2 2 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 4 . 7 6 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 0.957 J MW - 2 3 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 0 . 3 5 1 J < 0 . 2 6 0 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 < 0 . 3 7 2 MW - 2 5 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 0 . 4 6 8 J < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 5.78 MW - 2 7 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 1 . 6 9 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 0 . 4 2 6 J MW - 2 8 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 1 4 . 2 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 1.65 MW - 3 1 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 < 0 . 2 6 0 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 1.46 MW - 3 8 8 / 2 3 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 0 . 3 7 8 J < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 < 0 . 3 7 2 PM W - 1 D 8 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 2 5 . 5 J 0 . 5 4 6 J < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 15 0 0 0 <0 . 5 5 1 8 9 . 1 < 0 . 3 7 2 PM W - 2 S 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 0 < 3 . 3 1 < 3 . 8 0 < 3 . 2 7 < 2 . 7 5 < 3 . 2 4 83 2 0 <5 . 5 1 < 3 9 . 3 5.85 J PO C - 1 A 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 0 . 4 1 7 J 5 7 . 4 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 < 0 . 3 7 2 PO C - 1 B 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 1 . 4 4 J 8 . 4 2 J < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 2.58 J PO C - 2 A 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 0 < 3 . 3 1 < 3 . 8 0 < 3 . 2 7 < 2 . 7 5 < 3 . 2 4 62 1 0 <5 . 5 1 < 3 9 . 3 8.89 J PO C - 2 B 8 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 1 0 8 0 J < 8 . 2 8 < 9 . 5 0 < 8 . 1 8 < 6 . 8 8 < 8 . 1 0 35 0 0 0 <1 3 . 8 435 <9.30 PO C - 2 B 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 7 3 0 J < 8 . 2 8 < 9 . 5 0 < 8 . 1 8 < 6 . 8 8 < 8 . 1 0 41 0 0 0 <1 3 . 8 236 J <9.30 RW - 1 9 8 / 2 3 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 0 . 3 5 1 J 1 4 . 4 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 11.6 RW - 4 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 0 < 3 . 3 1 < 3 . 8 0 < 3 . 2 7 < 2 . 7 5 < 3 . 2 4 17 1 0 0 <5 . 5 1 < 3 9 . 3 < 3 . 7 2 RW - 6 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 3 8 . 3 J < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 0 . 4 0 7 J 28 4 0 <0 . 5 5 1 6 8 . 0 0 . 5 0 0 J DI W - 1 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 5 2 2 2. 2 <0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 0 . 3 4 9 J 2 6 . 2 27 9 <0 . 5 5 1 350 J 0.401 J SI W - 1 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 0 . 3 0 9 J 2 . 8 0 J 99 1 <0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 1.48 WS W - A N D R E W S 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 < 0 . 2 6 0 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 < 0 . 3 7 2 WS W - P E R R Y 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 < 0 . 2 6 0 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 < 0 . 3 7 2 No t e s : 1, 2 - D C A - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h a n e c i s - 1 , 2 - D C E - c i s - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e < - N o n - d e t e c t ME K - M e t h y l E t h y l K e t o n e 1 , 1 - D C A - 1 , 1 - D i c h l o r o e t h a n e B o l d v a l u e s i n d i c a t e a n e x c e e d a n c e o f p e r m i t l i m i t . TC E - T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 , 2 - D C E - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 , 1 , 1 - T C A - 1 , 1 , 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e TC F M - T r i c h l o r o f l u o r o m e t h a n e 1 , 2 - T C P - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o p r o p a n e 1 , 1 - D C E - 1 , 1 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e tr a n s - 1 , 2 - D C E - t r a n s - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e J - E s t i m a t e d P C E - T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e 1, 1 , 2 - T C A - 1 , 1 , 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e µg / L  ‐   mic r o g r a m s  pe r  lit e r U - n o t d e t e c t e d a b o v e t h e l e v e l o f t h e r e p o r t e d s a m p l e q u a n t i t a t i o n l i m i t UJ - t h e a n a l y t e w a s n o t d e t e c t e d ; h o w e v e r , t h e r e p o r t e d q u a n t i t a t i o n l i m i t i s a p p r o x i m a t e d a n d m a y b e i n a c c u r a t e o r i m p r e c i s e . N D - n o t d e t e c t e d We l l S a m p l e D a t e NC A C 2 L P e r m i t L i m i t AE C O M Page 1 of 2 Ta b l e 3 - 1 Su m m a r y o f O r g a n i c A n a l y t i c a l R e s u l t s - R C R A P e r m i t P a r a m e t e r s f o r S i t e W e l l s Se c o n d 2 0 1 6 G r o u n d w a t e r M o n i t o r i n g R e p o r t Fo r m e r P a r k e r H a n n i f i n F a c i l i t y Wa k e F o r e s t , N o r t h C a r o l i n a MW - 3 8 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 3 D U P 0 3 8 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 4 8 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 5 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 6 8 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 6 D 8 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 6 D D U P 0 2 8 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 6 D R 8 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 6 D R 3 8 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 7 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 8 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 8 D 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 8 D R 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 1 5 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 2 1 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 2 1 D 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 2 2 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 2 3 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 2 5 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 2 7 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 2 8 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 3 1 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 MW - 3 8 8 / 2 3 / 2 0 1 6 PM W - 1 D 8 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 PM W - 2 S 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 PO C - 1 A 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 PO C - 1 B 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 PO C - 2 A 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 PO C - 2 B 8 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 PO C - 2 B 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 RW - 1 9 8 / 2 3 / 2 0 1 6 RW - 4 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 RW - 6 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 DI W - 1 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 SI W - 1 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 WS W - A N D R E W S 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 WS W - P E R R Y 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 We l l S a m p l e D a t e NC A C 2 L P e r m i t L i m i t To l u e n e t r a n s - 1 , 2 - D C E T C E T C F M V i n y l c h l o r i d e 1 , 1 , 1- T C A 1 , 1 - D C A 1 , 1 - D C E 1 , 2 - D C A 1 , 2 - D C P T o t a l V O C ' s µg / L µ g / L µ g / L µ g / L µ g / L µ g / L µ g / L µ g / L µ g / L µ g / L µ g / L 60 0 1 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 . 0 3 2 0 0 6 7 0 . 4 0 . 6 <0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 34 . 2 <1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 3 8 . 8 5 <0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 38 . 1 <1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 4 3 . 5 3 6. 2 9 J 0 . 9 7 6 J 39 1 0 0 J <1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 0 . 4 6 0 J < 0 . 2 5 9 1 . 9 8 J < 0 . 3 6 1 21.7 J 40427.916 <0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 3. 6 5 <1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 7 . 8 8 6 <0 . 7 8 0 1 3 . 3 J 45 6 0 J <1 . 2 0 0. 6 1 5 J <0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 1 . 0 9 J < 0 . 3 6 1 0 . 3 7 8 J 5 1 9 4 . 8 8 3 <0 . 7 8 0 2 . 1 5 J 19 1 0 <1 . 2 0 0. 5 6 1 J <0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 3 . 6 1 0. 6 3 8 J 0.392 J 4 5 6 0 . 0 5 1 <0 . 7 8 0 8 . 0 3 J 18 4 0 <1 . 2 0 0. 8 5 4 J <0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 3 . 9 2 0. 8 6 0 J 0.416 J 4 3 7 0 . 5 3 <0 . 7 8 0 3 . 1 8 22 2 0 <1 . 2 0 2 <0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 5 . 4 8 0. 4 6 5 J <0.306 4976.135 <0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 20 5 <1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 2 0 7 . 3 1 5 1. 9 6 J < 0 . 3 9 6 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 6 0 . 0 6 <0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 8. 6 6 <1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 1 7 . 5 7 <0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 3. 2 6 <1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 3 . 7 5 9 <0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 24 . 2 2. 2 4 J < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 3 6 . 9 3 <0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 21 8 <1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 2 4 2 . 1 4 <0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 1.64 1.64 <0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 0 . 5 1 1 J < 1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 0 . 5 1 1 <0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 32 . 8 <1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 3 8 . 5 1 7 <0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 1 . 9 6 < 1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 0 . 3 5 1 <0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 3. 0 5 <1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 9 . 2 9 8 <0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 5. 5 5 <1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 7 . 6 6 6 <0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 13 1 <1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 0 . 5 3 6 J < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 1 4 7 . 3 8 6 <0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 6. 8 9 <1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 8 . 3 5 <0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 13 . 8 <1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 1 4 . 1 7 8 1. 4 5 J 7 6 . 9 < 9 9 . 5 < 1 . 2 0 15 . 5 <0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 20 . 4 2 . 3 3 <0.306 15231.726 <7 . 8 0 < 3 . 9 6 47 4 0 <1 2 . 0 < 2 . 5 9 < 3 . 1 9 < 2 . 5 9 15 . 7 4 . 3 6 J <3.06 13085.91 <0 . 7 8 0 1 . 2 7 12 8 <1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 1 8 7 . 0 8 7 <0 . 7 8 0 0 . 5 3 3 J 35 5 0 J <1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 0 . 3 1 9 J 3 5 6 3 . 2 9 2 <7 . 8 0 < 3 . 9 6 87 5 0 <1 2 . 0 < 2 . 5 9 < 3 . 1 9 < 2 . 5 9 10 . 3 <3 . 6 1 < 3 . 0 6 1 4 9 7 9 . 1 9 <1 9 . 5 1 9 . 2 J 66 4 <3 0 . 0 19 . 8 J <7 . 9 8 < 6 . 4 8 69 . 5 1 2 . 5 J <7.65 37300 <1 9 . 5 < 9 . 9 0 31 9 <3 0 . 0 7. 5 5 J <7 . 9 8 < 6 . 4 8 38 . 3 <9 . 0 2 < 7 . 6 5 4 2 3 3 0 . 8 5 <0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 23 6 1. 4 1 J < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 2 6 3 . 7 6 1 <7 . 8 0 < 3 . 9 6 14 0 0 <1 2 . 0 < 2 . 5 9 < 3 . 1 9 < 2 . 5 9 29 . 5 1 1 <3.06 18540.5 <0 . 7 8 0 1 6 . 4 19 4 <1 . 2 0 5. 4 3 <0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 5 . 8 8 0. 8 1 0 J <0.306 3169.727 3. 8 5 J < 0 . 3 9 6 55 9 <1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 0 . 6 6 0 J < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 1 7 4 3 . 6 6 <0 . 7 8 0 2 . 8 2 17 1 0 <1 . 2 0 0. 2 9 2 J <0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 1 . 3 6 0. 4 8 5 J <0.306 2710.546 <0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 N D <0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0 . 3 0 6 N D No t e s : 1, 2 - D C A - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h a n e c i s - 1 , 2 - D C E - c i s - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e < - N o n - d e t e c t ME K - M e t h y l E t h y l K e t o n e 1 , 1 - D C A - 1 , 1 - D i c h l o r o e t h a n e B o l d v a l u e s i n d i c a t e a n e x c e e d a n c e o f p e r m i t l i m i t . TC E - T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 , 2 - D C E - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 , 1 , 1 - T C A - 1 , 1 , 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e TC F M - T r i c h l o r o f l u o r o m e t h a n e 1 , 2 - T C P - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o p r o p a n e 1 , 1 - D C E - 1 , 1 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e tr a n s - 1 , 2 - D C E - t r a n s - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e J - E s t i m a t e d P C E - T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e 1, 1 , 2 - T C A - 1 , 1 , 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e µg / L  ‐   mic r o g r a m s  pe r  lit e r U - n o t d e t e c t e d a b o v e t h e l e v e l o f t h e r e p o r t e d s a m p l e q u a n t i t a t i o n l i m i t UJ - t h e a n a l y t e w a s n o t d e t e c t e d ; h o w e v e r , t h e r e p o r t e d q u a n t i t a t i o n l i m i t i s a p p r o x i m a t e d a n d m a y b e i n a c c u r a t e o r i m p r e c i s e . N D - n o t d e t e c t e d AE C O M Page 2 of 2 Ta b l e 3 - 2 Hi s t o r i c a l T C E G r o u n d w a t e r A n a l y t i c a l D a t a Se c o n d 2 0 1 6 G r o u n d w a t e r M o n i t o r i n g R e p o r t Fo r m e r P a r k e r H a n n i f i n F a c i l i t y Wa k e F o r e s t , N o r t h C a r o l i n a Ju l y 2 0 0 5 Fe b 2 0 0 6 A u g 2 0 0 6 F e b 2 0 0 7 A u g 2 0 0 7 F e b 2 0 0 8 A u g 2 0 0 8 F e b 2 0 0 9 A u g 2 0 0 9 F e b 2 0 1 0 Se p t 2 0 1 0 Fe b 2 0 1 1 A u g 2 0 1 1 F e b 2 0 1 2 A u g 2 0 1 2 F e b 2 0 1 3 A u g 2 0 1 3 Feb 2014 A u g 2 0 1 4 M a r 2 0 1 5 S e p t 2 0 1 5 F e b 2 0 1 6 A u g 2 0 1 6 O c t 2 0 1 6 MW - 1 <1 < 1 . 0 < 1 U N S N S N S < 1 . 0 N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS N S N S N S N S N S MW - 2 NS 35 0 . 0 NS N S N S N S N S 18 1 0 NS N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS N S N S 118 NS N S MW - 3 NS 33 0 . 0 5 0 0 . 0 9 8 0 . 0 2 1 9 0 74 5 10 0 0 NS 24 2 0 1 5 2 0 NS 16 0 0 8 3 0 . 0 7 9 0 . 0 93 0 9 2 0 1200 1 1 0 0 J 1 7 0 0 1200 3 8 6 9 5 . 3 3 4 . 2 NS MW - 4 NS N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S 27900 J 3 9 1 0 0 J NS MW - 5 NS N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS N S 3.65 MW - 6 16 0 0 1 2 0 0 8 5 0 . 0 9 7 0 . 0 1 3 8 0 98 9 12 3 0 3 7 2 . 0 1 0 4 0 2 3 9 0 2 7 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 1 9 0 0 13 0 0 2 5 0 0 2800 2 8 0 0 J 4 9 0 4300 1 7 2 0 4 1 1 0 J 4 5 6 0 J NS MW - 6 D NS 93 0 . 0 1 3 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 8 0 0 13 5 0 39 7 9 8 9 . 0 1 3 1 0 2 0 9 0 9 8 0 . 0 1 5 0 0 1 5 0 0 9 7 0 20 0 0 2 6 0 0 2200 1 5 0 0 J 5 1 0 0 3500 NS 1430 1 9 1 0 NS MW - 6 D R 13 0 0 2 7 0 J 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 9 5 3 . 0 75 4 97 7 8 0 9 . 0 8 9 7 . 0 3 9 0 0 1 1 0 0 7 7 0 . 0 7 9 0 . 0 6 1 0 . 0 69 0 2 8 0 0 3600 9 1 0 7 7 0 850 NS 2100 2 2 2 0 NS MW - 6 D R 3 16 0 . 0 1 1 0 . 0 9 9 . 0 1 2 0 . 0 1 3 6 . 0 11 2 12 1 9 2 . 6 1 8 6 . 0 2 9 . 7 7 3 0 . 0 1 1 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 1 0 . 0 14 0 1 0 0 66 2 4 0 1 8 0 170 1 2 4 1 7 3 2 0 5 NS MW - 7 NS 23 0 . 0 NS 84 . 0 NS N S N S N S N S 11 . 8 3 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 NS N S NS N S N S NS NS NS N S N S N S < 1 MW - 8 NS 11 . 0 1. 7 6. 7 5 . 3 9. 6 NS 7. 3 9 . 5 7 . 6 9 0 0 . 0 1 1 . 0 NS 12 . 0 NS 7 . 8 9.8 1 2 1 4 5.9 1 0 . 1 9 . 5 6 8 . 6 6 NS MW - 8 D NS 8. 7 1 3 . 0 1 6 . 0 1 6 . 0 14 . 9 13 . 3 1 4 . 0 1 3 . 0 1 5 . 9 1 2 . 0 1 4 . 0 1 2 . 0 1 5 . 0 14 1 4 11 1 3 1 1 6.4 3 . 8 5 4 . 7 8 3 . 2 6 NS MW - 8 D R 25 . 0 6 3 . 0 9 2 . 0 6 5 . 0 5 0 . 7 39 . 9 36 . 2 3 3 . 3 2 7 . 1 3 6 . 2 3 4 . 0 3 8 . 0 3 1 . 0 3 4 . 0 19 3 7 37 4 2 4 2 35 2 2 . 3 2 2 . 8 2 4 . 2 NS MW - 9 NS N S N S 61 0 . 0 NS N S N S N S 38 3 . 0 NS N S 41 0 . 0 NS 57 0 . 0 NS N S N S NS NS NS N S N S N S N S MW - 1 0 NS N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S 8.84 NS N S MW - 1 1 NS 20 . 0 NS N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS NS N S 0 . 8 8 8 J N S N S MW - 1 1 D NS 61 0 . 0 NS N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS NS N S 469 NS N S MW - 1 3 10 . 0 7 . 9 8 . 0 NS N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS NS 2 . 6 4 N S N S N S MW - 1 5 NS 32 0 . 0 1 1 0 0 NS N S N S 11 5 0 5 5 8 . 0 NS N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS NS N S N S N S 218 MW - 1 7 NS 4 . 9 7. 8 NS N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS NS N S N S N S N S MW - 1 8 NS 7. 8 1. 2 N S N S <1 . 0 30 . 9 NS N S N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS NS N S N S N S N S MW - 1 8 D NS 3 . 6 4. 8 NS N S 1. 4 <1 . 0 N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS NS N S N S N S N S MW - 2 0 9.3 6 . 9 4 4 . 0 NS 2 . 8 N S N S 1 . 1 N S N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS NS N S N S N S N S MW - 2 1 1.0 < 1 . 0 5. 0 <1 . 0 < 1 U <1 . 0 <1 . 0 < 1 . 0 < 1 . 0 < 1 . 0 < 2 . 0 < 2 . 0 < 0 . 5 0 < 0 . 5 0 <0 . 5 0 < 0 . 5 0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.42 J < 0 . 1 5 3 < 1 . 5 0 < 0 . 3 9 8 N S MW - 2 1 D <1 . 0 < 1 . 0 9. 8 <1 . 0 < 1 U <1 . 0 <1 . 0 < 1 . 0 < 1 . 0 < 1 . 0 < 2 . 0 < 2 . 0 < 0 . 5 0 < 0 . 5 0 <0 . 5 0 < 0 . 5 0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.65 J < 0 . 1 5 3 < 0 . 5 0 0 0 . 5 1 1 J N S MW - 2 2 NS 13 0 . 0 8 2 . 0 NS N S N S 59 . 8 NS N S N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS NS N S N S N S 32.8 MW - 2 3 27 . 0 1 6 . 0 2 0 . 0 NS N S N S N S 16 . 2 NS N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS NS N S N S N S 1 . 9 6 MW - 2 4 NS 12 0 . 0 1 8 0 . 0 NS N S N S N S 19 4 . 0 NS N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS NS N S 214 NS N S MW - 2 5 31 0 . 0 1 9 0 . 0 2 2 0 . 0 NS N S N S 25 3 NS N S N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS NS N S N S N S 3.05 MW - 2 6 6.4 2 3 . 0 1 5 0 . 0 NS N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS NS N S N S N S N S MW - 2 7 15 0 . 0 1 1 0 . 0 < 1 U N S N S 44 . 4 NS 28 . 2 NS N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS NS N S N S N S 5.55 MW - 2 8 51 0 . 0 4 8 0 . 0 3 3 0 . 0 4 7 0 . 0 3 2 8 A 52 1 . 0 NS 27 3 . 0 NS N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS NS N S N S N S 131 MW - 2 9 17 . 0 1 4 . 0 1 3 . 0 NS N S N S 15 . 3 NS N S N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS NS 6.19 NS N S N S MW - 3 0 22 . 0 2 2 . 0 NS N S N S N S N S 1 . 1 N S N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS NS N S N S N S N S MW - 3 1 12 . 0 2 0 . 0 8 . 5 NS N S 7. 3 NS < 1 . 0 < 1 . 0 N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS NS N S N S N S 6.89 MW - 3 2 <1 < 1 . 0 < 1 U < 1 . 0 < 1 U <1 . 0 <1 . 0 N S < 1 . 0 N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS NS < 0 . 1 5 3 N S N S N S MW - 3 3 52 0 . 0 7 0 0 J 5 7 0 . 0 5 1 0 . 0 5 5 0 . 0 53 9 42 6 J 2 2 7 . 0 NS 27 2 . 0 NS 22 0 . 0 3 2 . 0 2 2 0 . 0 NS 2 0 0 N S 120 110 89 4 1 . 6 4 5 . 5 NS N S MW - 3 4 31 0 . 0 3 4 0 J 2 8 0 . 0 3 9 0 . 0 6 3 . 8 58 . 7 12 6 NS 91 . 0 NS 51 . 0 NS N S N S 29 6 0 120 NS 66 26 2 0 . 5 2 1 . 2 NS N S MW - 3 5 38 . 0 NS N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S NS NS NS N S N S N S N S MW - 3 5 R N S N S N S N S < 1 U N S < 1 . 0 N S < 1 . 0 N S N S N S N S N S NS N S N S <0.50 NS NS N S N S N S N S MW - 3 6 NS 1 . 1 < 1 U N S N S 1. 4 NS < 1 . 0 1 . 3 < 1 . 0 N S N S N S 1 . 4 1 0 . 8 8 0.92 0 . 5 3 < 0 . 5 0 NS < 0 . 3 1 2 U < 0 . 3 9 8 N S N S MW - 3 7 NS 43 . 0 4 4 . 0 NS 50 . 2 NS N S N S N S N S 6. 3 4 . 5 NS N S NS N S N S NS 20 20 NS 12.7 NS N S MW - 3 8 NS N S N S 20 . 0 1 7 . 5 20 . 1 24 . 3 2 4 . 5 2 7 . 1 2 4 . 0 2 2 . 0 2 1 . 0 3 2 . 0 2 6 . 0 33 2 9 29 2 7 2 2 14 1 0 . 9 J 1 1 . 7 1 3 . 8 NS MW - 3 9 NS N S N S < 1 . 0 < 1 U <1 . 0 <1 . 0 < 1 . 0 < 1 . 0 < 1 . 0 1 . 4 J < 2 . 0 < 0 . 5 0 0 . 4 7 J <0 . 5 0 < 0 . 5 0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.48 J N S < 0 . 9 5 7 U N S N S MW - 3 9 D NS N S N S < 1 . 0 < 1 U <1 . 0 <1 . 0 < 1 . 0 < 1 . 0 < 1 . 0 1 . 7 J 0 . 7 4 J 0 . 6 0 . 8 5 0. 6 3 0 . 5 3 <0.50 NS <0.50 0.50 J < 0 . 1 5 3 U J 0 . 8 8 3 J N S N S MW - 4 0 NS N S N S < 1 . 0 < 1 U <1 . 0 3. 4 2. 1 8. 5 9 . 2 1 1 . 0 6 . 0 5 . 3 3 . 3 2. 9 4 . 4 5.5 5 . 3 4 . 2 1.5 NS 0 . 6 3 9 J N S N S MW - 4 0 D NS N S N S 12 . 0 5 . 4 1. 3 7. 8 3 . 1 7 . 7 1 4 . 0 5 . 5 1 3 . 0 3 . 1 7 . 4 6. 3 2 3 11 7 . 3 7 . 6 1.6 0.768 J 1 . 8 4 N S N S MW - 4 1 NS N S N S < 1 . 0 < 1 U <1 . 0 <1 . 0 < 1 . 0 < 1 . 0 < 1 . 0 < 2 . 0 < 2 . 0 < 0 . 5 0 < 0 . 5 0 <0 . 5 0 < 0 . 5 0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.40 NS 0 . 5 3 8 J N S N S RW - 4 85 0 0 2 8 0 0 5 6 0 0 7 1 0 0 8 8 7 0 A 63 3 0 11 7 0 0 J 9 8 4 0 9 4 0 0 1 1 8 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 J 1 4 0 0 0 1 9 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 41000 3 9 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 J 190 1 7 . 7 J 1 4 1 0 1 4 0 0 NS RW - 6 20 0 0 1 5 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 5 0 0 1 5 7 0 13 8 0 16 5 0 1 2 6 0 1 8 5 0 4 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 9 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 8 0 0 19 0 0 7 6 0 3800 7 5 0 0 2 9 0 0 1500 9 8 3 J 9 5 8 1 9 4 NS RW - 1 9 NS 55 0 6 8 0 6 9 0 8 5 2 10 7 0 74 5 6 4 9 7 8 9 9 2 4 7 5 0 8 4 0 9 1 0 7 4 0 76 0 7 0 0 720 5 7 0 4 8 0 400 2 8 3 J 2 8 1 2 3 6 NS PO C - 1 A 32 0 0 4 3 0 1 5 0 0 4 8 0 0 NS N S 30 0 0 1 6 0 0 NS 34 4 0 7 4 0 NS N S N S NS 9 2 0 1300 J 1 2 0 0 7 8 0 6.9 2 1 4 4 3 . 9 1 2 8 NS PO C - 1 B 65 0 0 6 5 0 0 6 5 0 0 5 6 0 0 NS N S 14 4 0 0 1 1 9 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 7 2 0 0 1 3 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 7 0 0 44 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9400 8 4 0 0 J 9 9 0 0 6700 4 4 7 0 J 3 8 4 0 J 3 5 5 0 J NS PO C - 2 A NS N S N S 13 0 0 NS N S N S N S N S 18 6 0 0 3 2 0 0 NS N S N S NS 3 9 0 0 0 20000 1 8 0 0 0 J 2 2 0 0 0 3200 1 9 8 0 J 5 6 9 0 8 7 5 0 NS PO C - 2 B 16 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 NS 80 9 0 99 2 0 2 7 8 0 0 3 1 2 0 0 1 6 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 42 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 20000 2 2 0 0 0 J 4 0 0 0 0 6400 2 5 1 0 J 1 2 7 0 6 6 4 3 1 9 No t e s : µg / L - m i c r o g r a m s p e r l i t e r J - E s t i m a t e d NC A C 2 L - T i t l e 1 5 A N o r t h C a r o l i n a A d m i n i s t r a t i v e C o d e 2 L G r o u n d w a t e r S t a n d a r d NS - n o t s a m p l e d U - n o t d e t e c t e d a b o v e t h e l e v e l o f t h e r e p o r t e d s a m p l e q u a n t i t a t i o n l i m i t We l l I D Hi s t o r i c T C E N C A C 2 L P e r m i t L e v e l : 3 . 0 µ g/ L AE C O M Table 3-3 Summary of 1,4-Dioxane Groundwater Analytical Results Second 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Report Former Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina 1,4-Dioxane µg/L 3 MW-3 8/25/2016 <0.597 MW-4 8/25/2016 35.4 J MW-6 8/25/2016 2.90 J MW-6D 8/25/2016 2.05 J MW-6DR 8/25/2016 2.30 J MW-6DR3 8/25/2016 <0.597 MW-8 8/24/2016 <0.597 MW-8D 8/24/2016 <0.597 MW-8DR 8/24/2016 <0.597 MW-21 8/24/2016 <0.597 MW-21D 8/24/2016 <0.597 POC-1A 8/24/2016 <0.597 POC-1B 8/24/2016 1.28 J POC-2A 8/24/2016 11.1 J POC-2B 8/25/2016 <0.597 RW-19 8/23/2016 <0.597 RW-4 8/24/2016 3.43 RW-6 8/24/2016 3.26 Notes: < - Non-detect µg/L - micrograms per liter Bold values indicate an exceedance of permit limit. J - Estimated NCAC 2L - Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2L Groundwater Standard Well Sample Date NCAC 2L Permit Level AECOM Ta b l e 3 - 4 Hi s t o r i c a l 1 , 4 - D i o x a n e G r o u n d w a t e r A n a l y t i c a l R e s u l t s Se c o n d 2 0 1 6 G r o u n d w a t e r M o n i t o r i n g R e p o r t Fo r m e r P a r k e r H a n n i f i n F a c i l i t y Wa k e F o r e s t , N o r t h C a r o l i n a Ju l y 2 0 0 5 Fe b 2 0 0 6 A u g 2 0 0 6 F e b 2 0 0 7 A u g 2 0 0 7 F e b 2 0 0 8 A u g 2 0 0 8 F e b 2 0 0 9 A u g 2 0 0 9 F e b 2 0 1 0 Se p t 2 0 1 0 Fe b 2 0 1 1 A u g 2 0 1 1 F e b 2 0 1 2 A u g 2 0 1 2 Feb 2013 A u g 2 0 1 3 F e b 2 0 1 4 Aug 2014 M a r 2 0 1 5 S e p t 2 0 1 5 F e b 2 0 1 6 A u g 2 0 1 6 MW - 1 < 3 . 2 < 3 . 4 < 3 . 3 U N S N S N S < 3 . 2 N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS N S N S N S N S MW - 2 N S < 3 . 1 N S N S N S N S N S < 3 . 9 N S N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS N S N S N S N S MW - 3 N S < 3 . 0 < 3 . 6 U < 3 . 6 U < 3 . 8 U < 4 . 0 < 3 . 3 < 3 . 2 < 3 . 1 < 3 . 8 54 0 * <3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 <3.0 <3.0 <0.60 NS 0 . 6 7 4 J < 0 . 5 9 7 MW - 6 < 3 . 3 < 3 . 8 < 3 . 6 U < 3 . 4 U < 3 . 8 U < 3 . 5 < 3 . 3 < 4 . 0 < 3 . 3 < 4 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 <3.0 <3.0 13 J 2.72 J 2 . 8 0 J 2 . 9 0 J MW - 6 D N S < 3 . 3 < 4 . 4 U < 3 . 5 U < 4 . 5 U < 3 . 5 < 3 . 5 < 3 . 6 < 3 . 6 < 3 . 8 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 1 . 0 J < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 <3.0 <3.0 4.7 J NS 1 . 3 3 J 2 . 0 5 J MW - 6 D R < 3 . 8 < 3 . 1 < 3 . 3 U < 3 . 3 U < 3 . 2 U < 4 . 0 U J < 3 . 0 < 3 . 2 3.9 <3 . 9 < 3 . 0 1 . 6 J < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 <3.0 4.7 1.8 J N S 2 . 2 0 J 2 . 3 0 J MW - 6 D R 3 < 3 . 4 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 5 U < 3 . 1 U < 3 . 1 U < 3 . 9 < 3 . 1 < 3 . 2 < 3 . 2 < 3 . 0 U J 6. 4 <3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 <3.0 <3.0 <0.60 <0.597 < 0 . 5 9 7 < 0 . 5 9 7 MW - 7 N S < 4 . 1 N S < 3 . 6 U N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS NS N S N S N S MW - 8 N S < 3 . 7 < 3 . 0 U < 4 . 2 U < 3 . 9 U < 3 . 3 N S < 3 . 3 N S < 3 . 6 N S < 3 . 0 N S < 3 . 0 NS <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <0.60 NS < 0 . 5 9 7 < 0 . 5 9 7 MW - 8 D N S < 3 . 3 < 3 . 5 U < 3 . 6 U < 3 . 3 U < 3 . 7 < 3 . 2 < 3 . 8 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 8 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <0.60 NS < 0 . 5 9 7 < 0 . 5 9 7 MW - 8 D R < 3 . 1 < 3 . 4 < 3 . 4 U < 3 . 8 U < 3 . 2 U < 3 . 4 < 3 . 2 < 3 . 6 < 3 . 1 < 3 . 3 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <0.60 NS < 0 . 5 9 7 < 0 . 5 9 7 MW - 9 N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S < 3 . 0 NS NS N S NS NS NS N S N S N S MW - 1 1 N S < 3 . 1 N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS NS N S N S N S MW - 1 1 D N S < 3 . 0 N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS NS N S N S N S MW - 1 3 < 3 . 2 < 3 . 2 < 3 . 2 U N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS NS < 0 . 5 9 7 N S N S MW - 1 5 N S < 3 . 9 < 4 . 2 U N S N S N S < 3 . 2 < 3 . 3 N S N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS NS N S N S N S MW - 1 7 N S < 3 . 5 < 3 . 3 U N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS NS N S N S N S MW - 1 8 N S < 3 . 4 < 4 . 7 U N S N S < 3 . 5 < 3 . 1 N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS NS N S N S N S MW - 1 8 D N S < 3 . 7 < 3 . 5 U N S N S < 3 . 5 < 3 . 0 N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS NS N S N S N S MW - 2 0 < 3 . 1 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 2 U N S < 3 . 6 U N S N S < 3 . 3 N S N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS NS N S N S N S MW - 2 1 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 1 < 3 . 2 U < 3 . 4 U < 3 . 8 U < 3 . 5 < 3 . 2 < 3 . 8 < 3 . 3 < 3 . 0 < 1 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <0.60 NS < 0 . 5 9 7 < 0 . 5 9 7 MW - 2 1 D < 3 . 4 < 3 . 1 < 3 . 2 U < 3 . 4 U < 3 . 3 U < 3 . 6 < 3 . 2 < 3 . 8 < 3 . 3 < 4 . 0 < 1 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 1 . 9 J < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <0.60 NS < 0 . 5 9 7 < 0 . 5 9 7 MW - 2 2 N S < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 U N S N S N S < 3 . 2 N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS NS N S N S N S MW - 2 3 < 3 . 3 < 4 . 0 < 3 . 3 U N S N S N S N S < 3 . 6 N S N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS NS N S N S N S MW - 2 4 N S < 3 . 1 < 3 . 9 U N S N S N S N S < 3 . 6 N S N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS NS N S N S N S MW - 2 5 < 3 . 3 < 3 . 4 < 3 . 5 U N S N S N S < 3 . 3 N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS NS N S N S N S MW - 2 6 3 <3 . 6 < 4 . 6 U N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS NS N S N S N S MW - 2 7 19 1 7 1 7 NS N S 14 . 9 NS 10 NS N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS NS N S N S N S MW - 2 8 < 3 . 3 < 3 . 1 < 3 . 2 U < 3 . 2 U < 3 . 7 U < 4 . 5 N S < 3 . 4 N S N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS NS N S N S N S MW - 2 9 < 3 . 3 < 3 . 2 < 3 U N S N S N S < 3 . 0 N S N S N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS NS < 0 . 5 9 7 N S N S MW - 3 0 < 3 . 3 < 3 . 4 N S N S N S N S N S < 3 . 2 N S N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS NS N S N S N S MW - 3 1 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 1 < 3 . 2 U N S N S < 3 . 9 N S < 3 . 4 < 3 . 0 N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS NS N S N S N S MW - 3 2 < 3 . 2 < 3 . 1 < 3 . 4 U < 3 . 5 U < 3 . 8 U < 4 . 2 < 3 . 2 N S < 3 . 0 N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S NS NS NS < 0 . 5 9 7 N S N S MW - 3 3 39 3 4 3 3 2 9 3 2 . 4 2 6 . 1 2 7 . 4 2 2 . 3 NS 24 . 2 NS 22 1 1 9 . 8 NS 12 NS 14 21 NS 9.02 NS N S MW - 3 4 20 1 8 1 9 1 3 1 2 . 8 1 1 . 2 1 4 . 0 NS 11 . 6 NS 7. 5 NS N S N S 5. 8 7.8 3.7 NS 9.1 NS 6.62 NS N S MW - 3 5 R < 3 . 1 N S N S N S < 4 . 2 U N S < 3 . 4 N S < 3 . 2 N S N S N S N S N S NS NS N S <3.0 NS NS N S N S N S MW - 3 6 N S < 3 . 5 < 3 . 4 U N S N S < 4 . 4 N S < 3 . 5 < 3 . 2 < 3 . 8 N S N S N S < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 NS N S N S N S MW - 3 7 N S < 3 . 6 < 3 . 3 U N S < 3 . 3 U N S N S N S N S N S 10 <3 . 0 N S N S NS NS N S NS <3.0 NS N S N S N S MW - 3 8 N S N S N S < 4 . 3 U < 3 . 2 U < 3 . 3 < 3 . 1 < 3 . 8 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 8 < 1 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 1 . 4 J <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 NS N S N S N S MW - 3 9 N S N S N S < 3 . 4 U < 3 . 5 U < 3 . 2 < 3 . 2 < 3 . 4 < 3 . 7 < 3 . 8 < 1 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 NS N S N S N S MW - 3 9 D N S N S N S < 3 . 4 U < 3 . 6 U < 3 . 5 < 3 . 1 N S < 3 . 6 < 3 . 0 < 1 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 NS N S N S N S MW - 4 0 N S N S N S < 3 . 4 U < 3 . 2 U < 4 . 7 < 3 . 2 < 3 . 8 < 3 . 1 < 3 . 0 < 1 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 NS N S N S N S MW - 4 0 D N S N S N S < 3 . 3 U < 3 . 2 U < 4 . 6 N S < 3 . 4 < 3 . 8 < 3 . 5 < 1 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 NS N S N S N S MW - 4 1 N S N S N S < 3 . 3 U < 3 . 5 U < 3 . 4 < 3 . 2 < 3 . 1 < 3 . 3 < 3 . 0 < 1 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 NS N S N S N S RW - 4 5. 2 <3 . 3 < 3 . 3 U < 3 . 3 U 18 . 4 A <3 . 3 < 3 . 1 < 3 . 4 3.6 <3 . 2 12 2. 8 J < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 <3.0 <3.0 3.2 <0.60 6.12 3 . 4 9 3 . 4 3 RW - 6 < 3 . 1 < 3 . 4 < 3 . 6 U < 3 . 7 U < 3 . 3 U < 3 . 3 < 3 . 2 < 3 . 3 < 3 . 2 < 3 . 3 < 1 0 1 . 4 J < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 5.9 J 3 . 6 4 J 1.64 J 3.26 RW - 1 9 N S < 3 . 1 < 3 . 2 U < 3 . 6 U < 3 . 3 U < 3 . 3 < 3 . 1 < 3 . 3 < 3 . 1 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 0.84 J 0 . 7 0 6 J < 0 . 5 9 7 < 0 . 5 9 7 PO C - 1 A < 3 . 1 < 3 . 3 < 3 . 3 U < 3 . 6 U N S N S N S N S N S < 3 . 8 < 4 . 0 N S N S N S NS <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 1.0 J 0 . 8 7 9 J < 0 . 5 9 7 < 0 . 5 9 7 PO C - 1 B < 3 . 0 < 3 . 1 < 3 . 4 U < 1 7 U N S N S N S N S < 1 0 8. 1 <1 0 8. 5 9 . 2 <3 . 0 < 3 . 0 5.5 <3.0 11 4.1 8.7 J 1 0 . 5 J 1.94 J 1 . 2 8 J PO C - 2 A N S N S N S < 4 . 1 U N S N S N S N S N S 3. 6 5 3 0 * NS N S N S NS <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 7.9 <0.60 22.3 J 7 . 9 9 J 1 1 . 1 J PO C - 2 B 14 <3 . 1 15 < 1 7 U N S 4. 1 NS N S < 3 . 3 < 3 . 0 < 1 0 4. 3 <3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 < 3 . 0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <0.60 <0.597 < 0 . 5 9 7 < 0 . 5 9 7 No t e s : *S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 0 d a t a f o r w e l l s M W - 3 a n d P O C - 2 A a r e l i k e l y a n o m a l o u s a n d n o t r e p r e s e n t a t i v e o f a c t u a l g r o u n d w a t e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s . µg / L - m i c r o g r a m s p e r l i t e r Bo l d v a l u e s i n d i c a t e a n e x c e e d a n c e o f p e r m i t l i m i t . J - E s t i m a t e d NC A C 2 L - T i t l e 1 5 A N o r t h C a r o l i n a A d m i n i s t r a t i v e C o d e 2 L G r o u n d w a t e r S t a n d a r d NS - N o t S a m p l e d U = N o n - d e t e c t We l l I D Hi s t o r i c 1 , 4 - D i o x a n e N C A C 2 L P e r m i t L e v e l : 3 µ g / L AE C O M Table 3-5a Summary of Inorganic Analytical Results-RCRA Permit Parameters for Site Wells Second 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Report Former Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Copper Nickel Selenium Silver Zinc Mercury µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L 10 700 2 10 1000 100 20 20 1000 1 MW-3 8/25/2016 <6.50 47.7 <0.700 <10 U <5.30 <4.90 <7.40 <2.80 <5.90 <0.0490 MW-4 8/25/2016 <6.50 55.6 <0.700 <10 U <5.30 <4.90 <7.40 <2.80 9.18 J 0.235 MW-6 8/25/2016 <6.50 55.0 <0.700 <10 U <5.30 5.35 J <7.40 <2.80 17.0 J <0.0490 MW-6D 8/25/2016 <6.50 840 <0.700 <10 U <5.30 <4.90 <7.40 <2.80 86.3 <0.0490 MW-6DR 8/25/2016 <6.50 123 <0.700 <10 U 9.21 J <4.90 <7.40 <2.80 <5.90 <0.0490 MW-6DR3 8/25/2016 <6.50 13.8 <0.700 <10 U <5.30 <4.90 <7.40 <2.80 <5.90 <0.0490 MW-8 8/24/2016 <6.50 22.5 <0.700 <10 U <5.30 <4.90 <7.40 <2.80 <5.90 <0.0490 MW-8D 8/24/2016 <6.50 54.7 <0.700 <10 U <5.30 <4.90 <7.40 <2.80 23.2 J <0.0490 MW-8DR 8/24/2016 <6.50 28.5 <0.700 <10 U <5.30 <4.90 <7.40 <2.80 12.4 J <0.0490 MW-21 8/24/2016 <6.50 45.2 <0.700 <10 U 11.9 9.62 J <7.40 <2.80 9.83 J <0.0490 MW-21D 8/24/2016 <6.50 23.8 <0.700 <10 U <5.30 <4.90 <7.40 <2.80 153 <0.0490 POC-1A 8/24/2016 <6.50 61.5 <0.700 <10 U <5.30 <4.90 <7.40 <2.80 <5.90 0.0497 J POC-1B 8/24/2016 <6.50 39.8 <0.700 10.5 J <5.30 5.32 J <7.40 <2.80 24.2 J <0.0490 POC-2A 8/24/2016 <6.50 70.4 <0.700 <10 U <5.30 <4.90 <7.40 <2.80 7.80 J <0.0490 POC-2B 8/25/2016 <6.50 1790 <0.700 14.2 43.1 75.3 32.4 4.45 J 192 0.0991 J Notes:µg/L - micrograms per liter. < - Constituent was not detected above laboratory reporting limit.J - The associated numerical value is the approximate concentration of the analyze in the sample. Bold values indicate an exceedance of permit limit. Well ID Sample Date NCAC 2L Permit Level AECOM Ta b l e 3 - 5 b Su m m a r y o f I n o r g a n i c A n a l y t i c a l R e s u l t s - O c t o b e r 2 0 1 6 Se c o n d 2 0 1 6 G r o u n d w a t e r M o n i t o r i n g R e p o r t Fo r m e r P a r k e r H a n n i f i n F a c i l i t y Wa k e F o r e s t , N o r t h C a r o l i n a To t a l B a r i u m T o t a l C h r o m i u m T o t a l N i c k e l T o t a l S e l e n i u m Di s s o l v e d Ba r i u m Di s s o l v e d Ch r o m i u m Di s s o l v e d Ni c k e l Dissolved SeleniumChromium VI (Hexavalent) ug / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l 70 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 7 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 n s PO C - 2 B 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 6 13 4 0 8. 5 1 J 5 1 . 6 < 7 . 4 0 15 0 0 1 7 . 1 J 44 . 3 J < 6 6 . 6 5 . 0 0 J - No t e s : µg / L - m i c r o g r a m s p e r l i t e r . < - C o n s t i t u e n t w a s n o t d e t e c t e d a b o v e l a b o r a t o r y r e p o r t i n g l i m i t . J - : T h e a s s o c i a t e d n u m e r i c a l v a l u e i s t h e a p p r o x i m a t e c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f t h e a n a l y z e i n t h e s a m p l e b i a s e d l o w . Bo l d v a l u e s i n d i c a t e a n e x c e e d a n c e o f p e r m i t l i m i t . ns - n o s t a n d a r d We l l I D S a m p l e D a t e NC A C 2 L P e r m i t L e v e l AE C O M Ta b l e 3 - 6 Su m m a r y o f S u r f a c e W a t e r A n a l y t i c a l R e s u l t s Se c o n d 2 0 1 6 G r o u n d w a t e r M o n i t o r i n g R e p o r t Fo r m e r P a r k e r H a n n i f i n F a c i l i t y Wa k e F o r e s t , N o r t h C a r o l i n a Ac e t o n e B e n z e n e Br o m o - di c h l o r o m e t h a ne Di b r o m o - ch l o r o m e t h a n e Ca r b o n D i s u l f i d e C h l o r o f o r m c i s - 1 , 2 - D C E Di c h l o r o - di f l u o r o m e t h a n e ME K P C E T o l u e n e t r a n s - 1 , 2 - D C E T C E T C F M V i n y l c h l o r i d e 1 , 1 , 1 - T C A 1 , 1 - D C A 1 , 1 - D C E 1 , 2 - D C A 1 , 2 - D C P ug / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l u g / l NS 5 1 N S N S 1 . 6 N S N S N S N S 3 . 3 1 1 N S 3 0 N S 2 . 4 N S N S N S N S N S SW - 8 8 /24 /20 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 < 0 . 2 6 0 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 < 0 . 3 7 2 < 0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 <0.361 <0.306 SW - 9 8 /24 /20 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 < 0 . 2 6 0 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 < 0 . 3 7 2 < 0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 <0.361 <0.306 SW - 1 0 8 /24 /20 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 < 0 . 2 6 0 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 < 0 . 3 7 2 < 0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 <0.361 <0.306 SW - 1 0 D U P 8 /24 /20 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 < 0 . 2 6 0 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 < 0 . 3 7 2 < 0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 <0.361 <0.306 SW - 1 1 8 /24 /20 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 1 . 4 2 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 < 0 . 2 6 0 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 < 0 . 3 7 2 < 0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 1 . 2 0 0 . 3 9 9 J < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 .361 <0.306 SW - 1 2 8 /24 /20 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 6 . 9 9 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 1 . 2 3 < 0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 1 2 . 1 < 1 . 2 0 1 . 2 1 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 6 1 < 0.306 SW - 1 4 8 /24 /20 1 6 < 1 0 . 0 < 0 . 3 3 1 < 0 . 3 8 0 < 0 . 3 2 7 < 0 . 2 7 5 < 0 . 3 2 4 1 . 9 7 < 0 . 5 5 1 < 3 . 9 3 < 0 . 3 7 2 < 0 . 7 8 0 < 0 . 3 9 6 4 . 4 4 < 1 . 2 0 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 1 9 < 0 . 2 5 9 < 0 . 3 9 8 < 0 . 3 61 <0.306 No t e s : < = N o n - d e t e c t 1 , 2 - D C A = 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h a n e c i s - 1 , 2 - D C E = c i s - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e NS = n o s t a n d a r d M E K = M e t h y l E t h y l K e t o n e 1 , 1 - D C A = 1 , 1 - D i c h l o r o e t h a n e Bo l d v a l u e s i n d i c a t e a n e x c e e d a n c e o f t h e 2 B S t a n d a r d T C E = T r i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 , 2 - D C E = 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1, 1 , 1 - T C A = 1 , 1 , 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e T C F M = T r i c h l o r o f l u o r o m e t h a n e 1 , 2 - T C P = 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o p r o p a n e 1, 1 - D C E = 1 , 1 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e t r a n s - 1 , 2 - D C E = t r a n s - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e u g / l = m i c r o g r a m s p e r l i t e r PC E = T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 , 1 , 2 - T C A = 1 , 1 , 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e NC A C 2 B S t a n d a r d = N o r t h C a r o l i n a A d m i n i s t r a t i v e C o d e 2 B S u r f a c e W a t e r S t a n d a r d We l l S a m p l e D a t e NC A C 2 B S t a n d a r d AE C O M Table 3-7a Qualfied Analytical Data Second 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Report Former Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Sample ID Method Analyte Lab Result Lab Qualifier Validated Result Validation Qualifier1 Units Reason Codes2 MW-3 6010C Chromium 3.15 BJ 10 U µg/L MB MW-4 6010C Chromium 3.44 BJ 10 U µg/L MB MW-4 8260B Bromodichloromethane 5.32 5.32 J µg/L SUR MW-4 8260B Chloroform 7.19 7.19 J µg/L SUR MW-4 8260B 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.98 1.98 J µg/L SUR MW-4 8260B trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.976 J 0.976 J µg/L SUR MW-4 8260B 1,2-Dichloropropane 21.7 21.7 J µg/L SUR MW-4 8260B Toluene 6.29 6.29 J µg/L SUR MW-4 8260B 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.46 J 0.46 J µg/L SUR MW-4 8260B SIM 1,4-Dioxane 35.4 35.4 J µg/L SUR MW-6 6010C Chromium 8.05 BJ 10 U µg/L MB MW-6 8260B Chloroform 1.89 J 1.89 J µg/L SUR MW-6 8260B 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.09 1.09 J µg/L SUR MW-6 8260B trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 13.3 13.3 J µg/L SUR MW-6 8260B 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.378 J 0.378 J µg/L SUR MW-6 8260B Tetrachloroethene 5.61 5.61 J µg/L SUR MW-6 8260B Vinyl Chloride 0.615 J 0.615 J µg/L SUR MW-6 8260B SIM 1,4-Dioxane 2.9 J 2.9 J µg/L SUR MW-6D 6010C Chromium 3.82 BJ 10 U µg/L MB MW-6D 8260B trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.15 2.15 J µg/L FD MW-6DR 6010C Chromium 3.83 BJ 10 U µg/L MB MW-6DR3 6010C Chromium 6.18 BJ 10 U µg/L MB MW-8 6010C Chromium 2.42 BJ 10 U µg/L MB MW-8D 6010C Chromium 2.82 BJ 10 U µg/L MB MW-8DR 6010C Chromium 3.22 BJ 10 U µg/L MB MW-21 6010C Chromium 3.11 BJ 10 U µg/L MB MW-21D 6010C Chromium 3.22 BJ 10 U µg/L MB POC-1A 6010C Chromium 4.15 BJ 10 U µg/L MB POC-1B 6010C Chromium 10.5 B 10.5 J µg/L MB POC-1B 8260B Chloroform 1.44 J 1.44 J µg/L SUR POC-1B 8260B cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8.42 8.42 J µg/L SUR POC-1B 8260B trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.533 J 0.533 J µg/L SUR POC-1B 8260B 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.319 J 0.319 J µg/L SUR POC-1B 8260B Tetrachloroethene 2.58 2.58 J µg/L SUR POC-2A 6010C Chromium 4.69 B 10 U µg/L MB POC-2A 8260B SIM 1,4-Dioxane 11.1 11.1 J µg/L SUR DIW-1 8260B 2-Butanone 350 350 J µg/L LCS DUP-02-082516 8260B trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8.03 8.03 J µg/L FD DIW-1 8260B Benzene 0.665 J 0.665 J µg/L SUR DIW-1 8260B Chloroform 19.6 19.6 J µg/L SUR DIW-1 8260B 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.84 J 0.84 J µg/L SUR DIW-1 8260B cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 182 182 J µg/L SUR DIW-1 8260B 2-Butanone 474 474 J µg/L SUR DIW-1 8260B Tetrachloroethene 1.52 1.52 J µg/L SUR DIW-1 8260B Toluene 6.65 6.65 J µg/L SUR DIW-1 8260B Trichloroethene 1560 1560 J µg/L SUR Notes: U - The analyte was not detected above the level of the reported sample quantitation limit. J: The associated numerical value is the approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.2: Reason Codes:MB - Method blank contamination. SUR - The surrogate recovery was outside of the quality control limits.LCS - The laboratory control standard recovery was outside of the quality control limits. FD - The field duplicate %RPD was outside of the quality control limits. AECOM Table 3-7b Field Duplicate Precision Second 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Report Former Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Field Identification Analyte Sample Result Duplicate Result Units % RPD Qualification SW-10/DUP-01 none Acetone ND 13.7 J µg/L NC *none Chloroform 1.02 J 1.39 J µg/L 31 *none 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.638 J 0.860 J µg/L 29.6 none 1,1-Dichloroethene 3.61 3.92 µg/L 8.2 none cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2640 2500 µg/L 5.4 none trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.15 8.03 µg/L 116 yes 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.392 J 0.416 J µg/L 5.9 none Tetrachloroethene 1.68 1.36 µg/L 21 none Trichloroethene 1910 1840 µg/L 3.7 none Vinyl Chloride 0.561 J 0.854 J µg/L 41 *none cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 4.65 5.43 µg/L 15 none Trichloroethene 34.2 38.1 µg/L 11 none Notes: % RPD - Relative percent difference between the primary sample result and the sample duplicate result * The primary result was non-detect and the field duplicate result was below the reporting limit. Based on laboratory precision, the results are acceptable. ND - Analyte not detected NC - RPD could not be calculated µg/L - micrograms per liter J - Estimated All analytes were non-detect for the sample and the duplicate MW-6D/DUP-02 MW-3/DUP-03 AECOM Table 3-8 Summary of Intra-Aquifer Flow Second 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Report Former Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina WL Elev. Screen Midpoint Gradient (ft, msl) Elev. (ft, msl) (ft/ft) MW-6 359.57 341.25 Saprolite MW-6D 351.26 313.98 Rock MW-6D 351.26 313.98 Rock MW-6DR 358.70 288.96 Rock MW-6DR 358.70 288.96 Rock MW-6DR3 352.85 238.06 Rock MW-8 343.97 345.77 Saprolite MW-8D 344.64 293.8 Rock MW-8D 344.64 293.8 Rock MW-8DR 341.59 271.68 Rock MW-21 335.18 323.93 Saprolite MW-21D 328.87 209 Rock MW-39 338.35 329.66 Saprolite MW-39D 339.67 281.76 Rock MW-40 336.10 321.98 Saprolite MW-40D 336.24 290.69 Rock Notes: ft, msl - Feet relative to mean sea level ft/ft - feet per foot Positive gradient is downward (shallow well head > deep well head). WL Elev. - Water Level Elevation Aug-16 -0.004 Upward Aug-16 0.055 Downward Aug-16 -0.028 Upward Aug-16 -0.013 Upward 0.138 Downward Well ID Date Direction Aquifer Aug-16 0.305 Downward -0.297 Upward 0.115 Downward AECOM Table 4-1 Extraction Well Construction Details Second 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Report Former Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina RW-4 393.87 78 31.9 361.97 6" Stainless Steel 0.00 RW-6 388.02 65.08 21.94 366.08 6" Steel/Open Hole 0.17 RW-19 356.99 163.5 91.47 265.52 6" Steel/Open Hole 1.59 Notes: " - inch ft MSL - feet above mean sea level gpm - gallons per minute TOC - top of casing Water levels were measured on August 23, 2016 Estimated Average Flow Rate (gpm)Well ID TOC Elevation (ft MSL) Total Depth (feet) Depth to Water (feet) Static Water Level (ft MSL) Diameter/Construction Material AECOM Table 4-2 Summary of GWTS Inspection Records Second 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Report Former Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Date August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 RW-4 and RW-6 remain off line. November 2009 December 2009 RW-4 and RW-6 remain off line. January 2010 February 2010 September 2010 February 2011 August 2011 February 2012 August 2012 February 2013 August 2013 February 2014 August 2014 March 2015 September 2015 March 2016 May 2016 July 2016 September 2016 Notes: ERD - Enhanced Reductive Dechlorination GWTS - Groundwater Treatment System Comments All pumps operational throughout August 2009. System Influent and Effluent samples collected. RW-4 and RW-6 are taken off line at 11:35 September 18, 2009. RW-4 and RW-6 remain off line. System Influent and Effluent Samples Collected. RW-4 and RW-6 remain off line. System Influent and Effluent Samples Collected. RW-4 and RW-6 are brought back online on Friday February 26, 2010. All pumps operational throughout February 2010. RW-19 and RW-6 operational throughout August 2014. RW-4 shut down in preparation for pilot scale ERD in July 2014. System Influent and Effluent samples were collected August 2014. RW-19 pump operational throughout August 2013. RW-4 and RW-6 shut down in preparation for pilot scale ERD. System Influent and Effluent samples were collected September 2013. All pumps operational throughout February 2014. Cleaning and maintanence performed on system. System Influent and Effluent samples were collected February 2014. All pumps operational throughout September 2010. System Influent and Effluent samples were not collected in September. Samples were last collected in July 2010. All pumps operational throughout February 2011. System Influent and Effluent samples were collected in February 2011. All pumps operational throughout August 2011. System Influent and Effluent samples were collected in August 2011. All pumps operational throughout February 2012. System Influent and Effluent samples were collected January 2012. RW-6 flow meter was cleaned to restore its functionality. RW-19 flow meter was non-operational so it was replaced with the flow meter from RW-4 RW-6 shutdown in preparation for the Membrane Interface Probe investigation taking place in August 2016. RW-6 restarted in September 2016. RW-19 and RW-6 have been operational since RW-6 and RW-19 were shut down from September 2015 to December 2015 due to effluent plumbing issues . In January 2016, the effluent line was serviced and the system began running intermittently due to electrical issues. In February 2016 full service to the system was restored and RW-6 and RW-19 have been operational ever since. RW-4 remains inactive since injection preparation began in July 2014. System Influent and Effluent samples were collected in February 2016. All pumps operational throughout August 2012. Cleaning and maintanence performed on system. System Influent and Effluent samples were collected August 2012. RW-19 pump operational throughout February 2013. RW-4 and RW-6 shut down in preparation for pilot scale ERD. System Influent and Effluent samples were collected February 2013. RW-6 and RW-19 operational through March 2015. RW-4 shut down in July 2014 for ERD field pilot testing. System Influent and Effluent samples were collected in March 2015. RW-6 and RW-19 were shut down in September 2015 due to effluent plumbing issues . RW-4 has been inactive since injection preparation began in July 2014. System Influent and Effluent samples were collected in July 2015. AECOM Table 4-3 Influent-Effluent Water Sample Results Second 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Report Former Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Influent Effluent 8/29/2016 8/29/2016 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/l 16.3 <0.260 Tetrachloroethene ug/l 11.7 <0.372 Trichloroethene ug/l 221 2.02 Di-n-octyl phthalate ug/l 0.284 J 0.422 J Nitrate-Nitrite mg/L 1.360 1.390 Barium mg/L 0.0356 0.0353 Chromium mg/L 0.00416 0.00395 Copper mg/L 0.00947 0.00866 Zinc mg/L 0.0162 J 0.0138 Notes: J - Estimated Only detected constituents listed on table. mg/L - milligrams per liter ug/L - micrograms per liter Inorganic Compounds Compound Unit Volatile Organic Compounds Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds AECOM Table 4-4 Historical TCE Removal Efficiency Calculations for GWTS Second 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Report Former Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Date Sampled TCE Concentration Influent (µg/L) TCE Concentration Effluent (µg/L)Stripping Tower Efficiency (%) 4/22/1992 NS 430 NA 4/22/1992 NS 410 NA 4/29/1992 46,000 290 99.37 4/29/1992 47,000 270 99.43 5/18/1992 60,000 83 99.86 5/26/1992 27,000 88 99.67 6/1/1992 23,000 78 99.66 6/9/1992 23,000 63 99.73 6/15/1992 21,000 50 99.76 6/22/1992 19,000 40 99.79 6/29/1992 NS 40 NA 7/7/1992 NS 34 NA 7/13/1992 NS 30 NA 7/20/1992 NS 28 NA 7/27/1992 18,000 11 99.94 8/3/1992 NS 11 NA 8/11/1992 NS 9.1 NA 8/17/1992 NS 8.8 NA 8/24/1992 NS 7 NA 8/31/1992 19,000 7.3 99.96 9/8/1992 NS 7.6 NA 9/14/1992 NS 4.4J NA 9/21/1992 NS 5.6 NA 9/28/1992 18,000 14 99.92 10/5/1992 NS 14 NA 10/12/1992 NS 6.7 NA 10/19/1992 NS 16 NA 10/26/1992 NS 12 NA 11/2/1992 21,000 16 99.92 11/9/1992 NS 13 NA 11/16/1992 NS 14 NA 11/23/1992 NS 37 NA 12/2/1992 21,000 34 99.84 1/6/1993 22,000 11 99.95 2/1/1993 22,000 7.8 99.96 3/1/1993 18,000 11 99.94 4/7/1993 21,000 7.8 99.96 4/8/1993 54,000 26 99.95 4/16/1993 50,000 23 99.95 4/21/1993 60,000 27 99.96 4/30/1993 88,000 19 99.98 5/12/1993 50,000 15 99.97 6/7/1993 29,000 9.1 99.97 7/6/1993 42,000 8.8 99.98 9/2/1993 35,000 5.7 99.98 10/13/1993 13,000 34 99.74 11/1/1993 19,000 36 99.81 12/6/1993 13,000 22 99.83 AECOM Page 1 of 4 Table 4-4 Historical TCE Removal Efficiency Calculations for GWTS Second 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Report Former Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Date Sampled TCE Concentration Influent (µg/L) TCE Concentration Effluent (µg/L)Stripping Tower Efficiency (%) 1/4/1994 14,000 14 99.90 2/2/1994 22,000 21 99.90 3/1/1994 14,000 25 99.82 4/13/1994 6,510 8 99.88 5/2/1994 36 8.1 77.50 6/1/1994 14,500 9.1 99.94 7/5/1994 9,890 6.8 99.93 8/1/1994 12,800 6.6 99.95 9/2/1994 6,460 3.1 99.95 10/17/1994 8,960 7 99.92 12/5/1994 20,600 6.9 99.97 1/2/1995 24,300 8.1 99.97 2/7/1995 21,300 7.9 99.96 3/6/1995 18,800 6.9 99.96 5/1/1995 10,100 3.9 99.96 6/7/1995 13,400 2.8 99.98 7/3/1995 11,900 3.3J 99.97 8/1/1995 13,300 2.7 99.98 9/13/1995 2,090 BDL 100.00 Appx. 10/3/1995 3,820 2.7 J 99.93 11/3/1995 2,100 BDL 100.00 Appx. 12/1/1995 28,430 4.8 99.98 1/4/1996 4,120 5.4 99.87 2/26/1996 11,100 4.7 99.96 3/7/1996 27,000 7.1 99.97 4/1/1996 6,760 5.5 99.92 5/2/1996 3,800 4.2 99.89 6/4/1996 13,520 3.6 99.97 7/1/1996 3,800 3.2 99.92 8/1/1996 13,400 BDL 100 9/5/1996 4,160 2.3 99.94 10/1/1996 4,400 2.4 99.95 11/1/1996 1,720 7.2 99.58 12/13/1996 3,240 3.4 99.90 1/8/1997 22,000 2.6 99.99 4/8/1997 3,440 7.6 99.78 7/3/1997 11,540 4.8 99.96 10/2/1997 9,320 2.3 99.98 1/12/1998 8,510 20.7 99.76 7/7/1998 6,980 6.4 99.91 10/5/1998 7,210 BDL 100 1/12/1999 6,370 3.7 99.94 4/6/1999 2,900 BDL 100 7/6/1999 3,740 BDL 100 10/5/1999 3,735 BQL 100 1/17/2000 5,480 5 99.91 4/3/2000 6,780 2.5 99.96 7/3/2000 3,810 2.7 99.93 10/9/2000 4,050 BQL 100 AECOM Page 2 of 4 Table 4-4 Historical TCE Removal Efficiency Calculations for GWTS Second 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Report Former Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Date Sampled TCE Concentration Influent (µg/L) TCE Concentration Effluent (µg/L)Stripping Tower Efficiency (%) 1/3/2001 3,831 3.2 99.92 4/19/2001 4,080 3.2 99.92 7/23/2001 2,450 1.3 99.95 10/8/2001 3,525 1.4 99.96 1/28/2002 1,880 4 99.79 7/26/2002 3,200 8 99.75 2/11/2003 2,420 4 99.83 4/22/2003 2,500 3 99.88 7/17/2003 1,500 BQL 100 Aprox. 2/5/2004 1,520 7.64 99.49 7/28/2004 1,570 BQL 100 Aprox. 1/27/2005 2,690 1.64 99.939 4/20/2005 NM BQL 100 Aprox. 7/25/2005 4,000 NM NM 2/28/2006 2,560 ND 100 3/31/2006 7,300 ND 100 4/28/2006 5,900 ND 100 5/25/2006 1,790 ND 100 6/21/2006 1,160 ND 100 8/24/2006 1,260 ND 100 10/25/2006 1,629 ND 100 12/27/2006 4,110 ND 100 2/26/2007 1,975 ND 100 4/27/2007 1,890 ND 100 6/22/2007 4,290 ND 100 8/22/2007 7,540 ND 100 10/26/2007 4,880 ND 100 12/26/2007 1,080 ND 100 2/29/2008 1,160 ND 100 4/25/2008 1,090 ND 100 6/27/2008 3,100 ND 100 8/29/2008 1,690 ND 100 10/30/2008 1,790 ND 100 12/18/2008 735 ND 100 2/26/2009 5,500 ND 100 4/29/2009 1,840 ND 100 6/25/2009 1,430 66.2 95.37 8/31/2009 1,790 189 89.44 11/12/2009 932 48.9 94.75 1/12/2010 1,030 ND 100 3/18/2010 8,760 ND 100 5/21/2010 3,500 ND 100 7/15/2010 2,100 ND 100 11/16/2010 3,500 ND 100 1/25/2011 2,600 ND 100 3/24/2011 1,700 ND 100 5/18/2011 2,300 ND 100 8/29/2011 3,100 ND 100 AECOM Page 3 of 4 Table 4-4 Historical TCE Removal Efficiency Calculations for GWTS Second 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Report Former Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Date Sampled TCE Concentration Influent (µg/L) TCE Concentration Effluent (µg/L)Stripping Tower Efficiency (%) 1/10/2012 3,000 54 98.20 8/20/2012 2,900 ND 100 2/20/2013 12,000 ND 100 2/20/2013 690 11 98.41 9/29/2013 690 25 96.38 2/18/2014 1,800 ND 100.00 8/4/2014 2,100 ND 100.00 2/19/2015 1,400 ND 100.00 7/2/2015 200 ND 100.00 2/19/2016 501 2.01 99.60 4/29/2016 322 0.987 99.69 7/7/2016 236 2.17 99.08 8/29/2016 221 2.02 99.09 Notes: Semi-Annual Remediation System Evaluation (Earth Tech, 2005). µg/L - micrograms per liter System efficiency rates from 7/25/2005 to 7/15/2010 estimated by AECOM. Previous efficiency data taken from the GWTS - groundwater treatment system Removal efficiency for First 2006 event based on influent/effluent sampling from 2/28/06. TCE - trichloroethene AECOM Page 4 of 4 Table 4-5 Historical Estimated GWTS Pumping Rates and Mass Removal Second 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Report Former Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Period Influent Concentration, Period Average (mg/L) Flow Total for Period (x 106 gallons) Mass of TCE Removed (pounds) May 1992 – Feb 1993 24.3 2.2 449 Mar 1993 – Aug 1993 43.4 2.8 998 Sep 1993 – Feb 1994 19.3 2.2 360 Mar 1994 – Aug 1994 15.6 2 256 Sep 1994 – Feb 1995 16.3 1.7 227 Mar 1995 – Aug 1995 13.5 1.7 197 Sep 1995 – Feb 1996 8.6 1 73 Mar 1996 – Aug 1996 11.4 1.7 160 Sep 1996 – Feb 1997 7.1 2.2 132 Mar 1997 – Aug 1997 7.5 1.4 85 Sep 1997 – Feb 1998 8.9 1.7 125 Mar 1998 – Aug 1998 7 1.8 106 Sep 1998 – Feb 1999 6.8 1 59 Mar 1999 – Aug 1999 3.3 1 28 Sep 1999 – Feb 2000 4.6 1.6 59 Mar 2000 – Jul 2000 5.3 1.2 55 Aug 2000 – Feb 2001 4 1.7 56 Mar 2001 – Aug 2001 3.3 1.6 43 Sep 2001 – Feb 2002 2.7 1.1 26 Mar 2002 – Aug 2002 3.2 1.3 34 Sep 2002 - Feb 2003 2.4 0.95 19 Mar 2003 - Aug 2003 2 1.068 18 Sep 2003 - Feb 2004 1.5 1.7 21 Feb 2004 - July 2004 1.57 1.74 23 July 2004 - Jan 2005 2.7 1.88 42 Jan 2005 - July 2005 3.4 1.3 37 July 2005 - Feb 2006 2.56 0.4 9 Feb 2006 - Aug 2006 2.85 1.11 26 Aug 2006 – Feb 2007 2.11 1.13 20 Feb 2007 - Aug 2007 3.92 2.06 67 Aug 2007 - Feb 2008 3.67 1.21 37 Feb 2008 - Aug 2008 1.76 0.75 11 Aug 2008 - Feb 2009 2.68 1.27 28 Feb 2009 - Aug 2009 2.64 1.67 37 Aug 2009 - Feb 2010 1.43 0.36 4 Feb 2010 - July 2010 2.13 0.31 5 July 2010 - Feb 2011 2.73 1.95 44 Feb 2011 - Aug 2011 3.1 2.06 53 Aug 2011 - Feb 2012 2.8 1.63 37 Feb 2012 - Aug 2012 2.9 1.76 62 Aug 2012 - Feb 2013 12.0 0.43 62 Feb 2013 - Aug 2013 0.7 0.33 3 Aug 2013 - Feb 2014 1.8 0.66 7 Feb 2014 - Aug 2014 2.1 1.54 18 Aug 2014 - Feb 2015 1.40 0.88 7 Feb 2015 - Aug 2015 0.71 0.53 3 Aug 2015 - Feb 2016 0.50 0.11 0.5 Mar 2016 - Aug 2016 0.23 0.62 1.2 TOTAL 64.3 4,230.6 Notes: GWTS - groundwater treatment system mg/L - milligrams per liter TCE - trichloroethene AECOM Table 4-6 SVE Soil Vapor Sampling Results Second 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Report Former Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina 1, 1 , D i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e Me t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e Tr a n s - 1 , 2 Di c h l o r o e t h y l e n e 1, 1 D i c h l o r o e t h a n e CI S - 1 , 2 Di c h l o r o e t h y l e n e Ch l o r o f o r m 1, 1 , 1 T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e Ca r b o n T e t r a c h l o r i d e Tr i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e Te t r a c h l o r o e t h y l e n e 2/14/2011 <40 <348 <40 <81 95 <24 <27 <32 517 1,522 4/25/2011 <40 <348 <40 <81 83 <24 <27 <32 458 1,081 7/18/2011 2245 <348 <40 <81 389 <24 <27 <32 1,169 2,379 1/11/2012 <40 <348 <40 <81 441 <24 <27 <32 1,395 3,602 8/30/2012 <40 <348 <40 <81 143 <24 <27 <32 722 1,604 2/20/2013 <40 <348 <40 <81 <40 <24 <27 <32 889 <34 8/14/2013 <40 <348 <40 <81 191 <24 <27 <32 598 1,522 2/19/2014 <40 <348 <40 <81 230 <24 <27 <32 1,012 2,746 8/18/2014 <40 <348 <40 <81 187 <24 <27 <32 264 476 3/4/2015 <40 <348 <40 <81 60 <24 <27 <32 237 1,047 9/3/2015 <40 <348 <40 <81 167 <24 <27 <32 813 1,651 3/4/2016 <40 <348 <40 <81 314 <24 <27 <32 533 1,692 9/6/2016 <40 <348 <40 <81 <40 <24 <27 <32 3,269 197 2/14/2011 <40 <348 <40 <81 381 <24 <27 <32 2,030 3,446 4/25/2011 <40 <348 <40 <81 501 <24 <27 <32 1,239 3,704 7/18/2011 7406 <348 <40 <81 83 <24 <27 <32 118 306 1/11/2012 <40 <348 <40 <81 99 <24 <27 <32 673 1,842 8/30/2012 <40 <348 <40 <81 <40 <24 <27 <32 <27 <34 2/20/2013 <40 <348 <40 <81 282 <24 <27 <32 2,073 1,760 8/14/2013 <40 <348 <40 <81 103 <24 <27 <32 210 700 2/19/2014 <40 <348 <40 <81 401 <24 <27 <32 1,104 3,819 8/18/2014 <40 <348 <40 <81 342 <24 <27 <32 738 1,142 3/4/2015 <40 <348 <40 <81 242 <24 <27 <32 1,906 3,466 9/3/2015 <40 <348 <40 <81 <40 <24 <27 <32 248 360 3/4/2016 <40 <348 <40 <81 219 <24 <27 <32 1,136 1,835 9/6/2016 <40 <348 <40 <81 40 <24 <27 <32 226 483 2/14/2011 <40 <348 <40 <81 <40 <24 <27 <32 21,572 143 4/25/2011 <40 <348 <40 <81 <40 <24 <27 <32 14,927 183 7/18/2011 5058 <348 <40 <81 <40 <24 <27 <32 6,101 265 1/11/2012 <40 <348 <40 <81 40 <24 <27 <32 13,872 156 8/30/2012 <40 <348 <40 <81 <40 <24 <27 <32 4,776 150 2/20/2013 <40 <348 <40 <81 <40 <24 <27 <32 5,972 61 8/14/2013 <40 <348 <40 <81 <40 <24 <27 <32 3,780 102 2/19/2014 <40 <348 <40 <81 <40 <24 <27 <32 12,741 136 8/18/2014 <40 <348 <40 <81 <40 <24 <27 <32 7,087 102 3/4/2015 <40 <348 <40 <81 44 <24 <27 <32 18,072 129 9/3/2015 <40 <348 <40 <81 48 <24 <27 <32 6,080 306 3/4/2016 <40 <348 <40 <81 <40 <24 <27 <32 4,960 143 9/6/2016 <40 <348 <40 <81 278 <24 <27 <32 980 3,201 2/14/2011 <40 <348 <40 <81 103 <24 <27 <32 2,763 1,189 7/18/2011 2980 <348 <40 <81 52 <24 <27 <32 1,545 401 1/11/2012 <40 <348 <40 <81 107 <24 <27 <32 3,296 938 8/30/2012 <40 <348 <40 <81 131 <24 <27 <32 2,429 1,087 2/20/2013 <40 <348 <40 <81 111 <24 <27 <32 1,438 347 8/14/2013 <40 <348 <40 <81 91 <24 <27 <32 2,800 340 2/19/2014 <40 <348 <40 <81 199 <24 <27 <32 5,089 1,271 8/18/2014 <40 <348 <40 <81 119 <24 <27 <32 2,019 238 3/4/2015 <40 <348 <40 <81 234 <24 <27 <32 5,913 639 9/3/2015 <40 <348 <40 <81 95 <24 <27 <32 1,756 428 3/4/2016 <40 <348 <40 <81 159 <24 <27 <32 1,890 557 9/6/2016 <40 <348 <40 <81 95 <24 <27 <32 1,373 748 2/14/2011 <40 <348 <40 <81 <40 <24 <27 <32 323 <34 7/18/2011 <40 <348 <40 <81 <40 <24 <27 <32 32 <34 1/11/2012 <40 <348 <40 <81 <40 <24 <27 <32 38 <34 8/30/2012 <40 <348 <40 <81 <40 <24 <27 <32 635 347 2/20/2013 <40 <348 <40 <81 52 <24 <27 <32 770 313 8/14/2013 <40 <348 <40 <81 64 <24 <27 <32 1,696 367 2/19/2014 <40 <348 <40 <81 115 <24 <27 <32 2,757 904 8/18/2014 <40 <348 <40 <81 83 <24 <27 <32 1,879 428 3/4/2015 <40 <348 <40 <81 68 <24 <27 <32 3,656 537 9/3/2015 <40 <348 <40 <81 <40 <24 <27 <32 1,756 428 3/4/2016 <40 <348 <40 <81 40 <24 <27 <32 27 <34 9/6/2016 <40 <348 <40 <81 <40 <24 <27 <32 700 381 Notes: ug/m3 - micrograms per cubic meter Bold denotes detection above laboratory limits Well Sample Date ug/m3 Effluent Influent SVE-6 SVE-5 SVE-4 AECOM AECOM Environment 60489813.3 April 2017 Figures SITE Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed Map Location March 2016 60489813 Topographic Site Location Map Former Parker Hannifin Corp. Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Figure 1-1 0 2,000 4,000Feet NC SC VA GA TN KY WV USGS Topographic Quadrangle Wake Forest (1983) AECOM1600 Perimeter Park DriveSuite 400Morrisville, NC 27560Phone: (919) 461-1100Fax: (919) 461-1415www.aecom.com . 1:24,000 X: \ D C S \ P r o j e c t s \ L - A E C O M \ G e o m a t i c s \ G I S \ P r o j e c t s \ P \ P a r k e r _ H a n n i f i n \ W a k e _ F o r e s t _ N C \ M X D \ F i g u r e _ 1 - 1 _ S i t e _ L o c a t i o n _ T o p o _ 2 0 1 6 . m x d NC S R 1 9 2 9 - W A K E U N I O N C H A P E L R O A D CURB GIRONDE COURT HORSE CREEK T.S . SPARHAWK ROADBISCAY LANEKEARNEY ROAD CAPELLAN STREETWINKWORTH WAY DEEP WOODS TRAIL W A K E U N I O N C H A P E L R O A D CA P I T O L B O U L E V A R D CA P I T O L B O U L E V A R D TRIBUTARY A2 TOHORSE CREEK CREEK IS PROPERTY LINECENTER OF HORSE CREEK IS PROPERTY LINECENTER OF HORSE P R O P E R T Y L I N E F O R M E R P A R K I N G A R E A CP&LSUBSTATIONFORMER OFFICE SPACE F O R M E R O F F I C E S P A C E PARKER H A N N I F I N FORMER F A C I L I T Y RAWMATERIALSFORMERWAREHOUSEF O R M E R PL A T I N G R O O M F O R M E R P A I N T R O O M 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 SW16SW17 S W 1 5 D I W - 1 S W 1 4 SW12 S W 1 4 P O C - 2 A S I W - 1 P O C - 2 B P O C - 1 A P O C - 1 B P M W - 1 S P M W - 2 S P M W - 1 D MW-23 M W - 1 5 M W - 2 7 MW-14MW-11DMW-29 M W - 1 8 D M W - 6 D R MW-30 M W - 4 1 M W - 3 9 D M W - 3 9 M W - 4 0 D M W - 4 0 M W - 3 4 M W - 3 5 M W - 2 8 M W - 2 2 MW-9MW-17 MW-8DRMW-8D MW-7 MW-21MW-21D M W - 1 0 M W - 6 D MW-11MW-5MW-25 M W - 3 MW-16MW-13MW-12 MW-8 M W - 3 3 M W - 3 2 M W - 1 MW-31 M W - 1 8 M W - 3 7 M W - 3 6 M W - 3 8 MW-26 M W - 6 M W - 2 0 R W - 6 1 3 . 8 N S N S N S N S N S 1 3 1 3 2 . 8 2 1 8 NS 1.96<1.000.511 J24.2<0.3988.66NSNSNS 2 2 2 0 N S N S 6 6 4 8 7 5 0 N S 3 5 5 0 3.65NS N S NSNSNS3.05 N S N S N S N S 4 5 6 0 N S 3.26 3 4 . 2 5 . 5 5 N S N S NS 1 9 1 0 1 9 4 NS6.89 1 2 8 5 5 9 N S 4 7 4 0 NS M W - 4 3 9 1 0 0 < 2 5 0 P M W - 2 D N S R W - 4 1 4 0 0 V T. S . F E N C E G A T E N E W 1 2 ' D O U B L E S W I N G G A T E E X I S T I N G G R O U N D W A T E R T R E A T M E N T A N D S V E S Y S T E M N E P L A N T A R E A A O C 3 8 A R E A P R O P E R T Y L I N E F O R M E R P A R K I N G A R E A F E N C E G A T E C P & L S U B S T A T I O N R A W M A T E R I A L S F O R M E R W A R E H O U S E F O R M E R P L A T I N G R O O M F O R M E R P A I N T R O O M N C S R 1 9 2 9 - W A K E U N I O N C H A P E L R O A D 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 P O C - 2 A P O C - 2 B P O C - 1 A P O C - 1 B S W 1 2 P M W - 1 S P M W - 2 S P M W - 1 D M I P - 8 / D P T - 0 8 M I P - 1 1 / D P T - 1 1 M I P - 5 / D P T - 0 5 M I P - 6 M I P - 2 M I P - 3 / D P T - 0 3 M I P - 1 2 / D P T - 1 2 M I P - 1 4 / D P T - 1 4 M I P - 1 M I P - 2 5 M I P - 2 2 M I P - 2 4 / D P T - 2 4 M I P - 2 1 M I P - 2 3 / D P T - 2 3 M I P - 2 6 / D P T - 2 6 M I P - 2 8 M I P - 2 7 / D P T - 2 7 S I W - 1 P M W - 2 D M W - 2 7 M W - 1 4 M W - 1 1 D M W - 4 M W - 2 9 M W - 1 8 D M W - 6 D R M W - 3 0 M W - 1 7 M W - 8 D M W - 8 D R M W - 7 M W - 1 0 M W - 6 D M W - 1 1 M W - 5 M W - 2 5 M W - 3 M W - 1 3 M W - 1 2 M W - 8 M W - 1 M W - 1 8 M W - 2 6 R W - 4 M W - 6 M W - 2 0 R W - 6 2 4 . 2 < 0 . 3 9 8 8 . 6 6 N S N S N S 2 2 2 0 N S N S 6 6 4 8 7 5 0 3 5 5 0 N S N S N S N S 3 . 6 5 N S N S N S 3 . 2 6 3 4 . 2 3 9 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 V 5 . 5 5 N S 1 2 8 1 9 1 0 1 9 4 N S N S < 2 5 0 N S 4 7 4 0 N S D P T - 1 7 D P T - 1 8 D P T - 1 9 D P T - 2 0 D P T - 1 5 D P T - 1 3 D P T - 3 0 D P T - 2 9 M W - 1 6 N S 4 5 6 0 1 2 5 0 4 1 6 0 M I P - 4 / D P T - 0 4 9 4 . 4 < 1 . 0 5 2 1 , 4 6 0 1 2 4 0 1 1 8 2 , 5 2 0 9 6 . 6 1 5 . 2 1 . 0 5 3 9 . 5 2nd 2016 Semi Annual Report Former Parker Hannifin Corporation Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Project No.: 60489813 TCE ISOCONCENTRATION MAP AUGUST 2016 Figure: 3-3Date: 11/03/2016 CC SPVERIFY PRINTEDSCALE M W - 1 1 D M W - 1 4 F O R M E R L O C A T I O N O F O V E R H E A D P O W E R L I N E S L E G E N D R W - 4 R E C O V E R Y W E L L A D J A C E N T P R O P E R T Y B O U N D A R Y C R E E K W I T H F L O W D I R E C T I O N S O L I D W A S T E M A N A G E M E N T U N I T S W M U 3 2 N E W F E N C E M O N I T O R I N G W E L L C O M P L E T E D I N S A P R O L I T E O R P W R M O N I T O R I N G W E L L C O M P L E T E D I N B E D R O C K P O I N T O F C O M P L I A N C E M O N I T O R I N G W E L L C O M P L E T E D I N S A P R O L I T E O R P W R N E W G R O U N D W A T E R T R E A T M E N T S Y S T E M E F F L U E N T L I N E S W 9 S U R F A C E W A T E R S A M P L E L O C A T I O N T C E C O N C E N T R A T I O N ( u g / L ) SOURCE: BASE MAP CREATED FROM "BOUNDARY RETRACEMENT" DONE BYMURPHY & SACKS, PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS, 6308 J. RICHARD DR.,RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA, DATED OCTOBER 2002. WELL LOCATIONS WERENOT INCLUDED IN SURVEY, AND ARE APPROXIMATE. N O T E S : 1 . G R O U N D W A T E R S A M P L E S C O L L E C T E D A U G U S T a n d O C T O B E R , 2 0 1 6 . 2 . A L L R E S U L T S R E P O R T E D I N M I C R O G R A M S P E R L I T E R ( u g / L ) . 3 . D A T A F R O M D E E P B E D R O C K W E L L S N O T U S E D I N M A P I N T E R P R E T A T I O N . 4 . 7 8 A B B R E V I A T I O N S : N S = N O T S A M P L E D D U R I N G T H I S S A M P L I N G E V E N T . E = T H E A N A L Y T E C O N C E N T R A T I O N E X C E E D S T H E U P P E R L I M I T O F T H E I N S T R U M E N T E S T A B L I S H E D B Y T H E I N I T I A L C A L I B R A T I O N T C E C O N T O U R ( u g / L ) ( D A S H E D W H E R E I N F E R R E D ) 1 0 ANSI D 22" x 34" F O R M E R P A R K E R H A N N I F I N S I T E P R O P E R T Y B O U N D A R Y C O M P L E T E D M E M B R A N E I N T E R F A C E P R O B E L O C A T I O N D P T S O I L A N D / O R G R O U N D W A T E R S A M P L E L O C A T I O N I N S E T INSET Figure 4-1 Hydrographs of Historic Water Level Data - Extraction Wells First 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Report Former Parker Hannifin Facility, Wake Forest, North Carolina 245.00 265.00 285.00 305.00 325.00 345.00 7/ 2 / 0 6 8/ 6 / 0 7 9/ 9 / 0 8 10 / 1 4 / 0 9 11 / 1 8 / 1 0 12 / 2 3 / 1 1 1/ 2 6 / 1 3 3/ 2 / 1 4 4/ 6 / 1 5 5/ 1 0 / 1 6 6/ 1 4 / 1 7 RW-19 HYDROGRAPH 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 7/ 2 / 0 6 8/ 6 / 0 7 9/ 9 / 0 8 10 / 1 4 / 0 9 11 / 1 8 / 1 0 12 / 2 3 / 1 1 1/ 2 6 / 1 3 3/ 2 / 1 4 4/ 6 / 1 5 5/ 1 0 / 1 6 6/ 1 4 / 1 7 RW-6 HYDROGRAPH 310.00 320.00 330.00 340.00 350.00 360.00 370.00 7/2 / 0 6 8/6 / 0 7 9/9 / 0 8 10 / 1 4 / 0 9 11 / 1 8 / 1 0 12 / 2 3 / 1 1 1/ 2 6 / 1 3 3/2 / 1 4 4/6 / 1 5 5/ 1 0 / 1 6 6/ 1 4 / 1 7 RW-4 HYDROGRAPH Parker Hannifin Site Environmental Management Plan APPENDIX E SOIL GAS AND SUB-SLAB GAS ASSESSMENT DATA Parker Hannifin Corporation 6035 Parkland Boulevard Cleveland, OH 44124 Soil Gas Investigation Report Former Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina 60537015 April 2017 Soil Gas Investigation Report 60537015 Prepared for: Parker Hannifin, Cleveland, OH AECOM Tables Ta b l e 1 Su m m a r y o f S o i l G a s A n a l y t i c a l R e s u l t s Fo r m e r P a r k e r H a n n i f i n F a c i l i t y Wa k e F o r e s t , N o r t h C a r o l i n a Co m p o u n d No n - R e s i d e n t i a l Ex t e r i o r S G S L 1 SV 2 0 1 6 - 1 DU P - 0 1 - 10 2 8 2 0 1 6 SV 2 0 1 6 - 2 S V 2 0 1 6 - 3 S V 2 0 1 6 - 4 S V 2 0 1 6 - 5 S V 2 0 1 6 - 6 S V 2 0 1 6 - 7 S V 2 0 1 6 - 8 S V 2 0 1 6 - 9 S V 2 0 1 6 - 1 0 S V 2 0 1 6 - 1 1 S V 2 0 1 6 - 1 2 Ac e t o n e 2 , 7 2 0 , 0 0 0 7. 5 2 B 8 . 3 9 B <5 . 9 4 15 . 7 1 3 . 4 1 2 . 8 7 . 0 6 B 2 6 . 6 6 6 . 2 1 2 . 4 1 1 . 4 1 1 0 1 5 0 Be n z e n e 1 , 5 7 0 15 3 1 1 8 1 6 8 2 9 8 4 3 . 6 5 . 8 7 3 . 6 9 <1 . 2 8 75 . 9 7 . 1 8 1 7 . 7 3 . 5 4 2 . 8 7 1, 3 - B u t a d i e n e 1 7 5 < 8 . 8 5 J 3 < 8 . 8 5 9.4 3 J 3 4 4 . 8 J 3 <8 . 8 5 J 3 < 8 . 8 5 J 3 < 8 . 8 5 J 3 < 8 . 8 5 J 3 < 8 . 8 5 J 3 < 8 . 8 5 J 3 < 8 . 8 5 J 3 < 8 . 8 5 J 3 < 8 . 8 5 J 3 Ca r b o n D i s u l f i d e 6 1 , 3 0 0 66 . 8 3 4 . 4 1 6 . 9 1 8 0 9 . 6 6 1 . 2 9 1 . 3 9 <1 . 2 4 27 6 9 . 6 6 . 5 7 1 2 . 5 8 4 . 6 Ch l o r o e t h a n e 8 7 6 , 0 0 0 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 52 . 1 <1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 < 1 . 0 6 Ch l o r o f o r m 5 3 3 10 6 1 2 0 1 7 4 <1 . 9 5 < 1 . 9 5 < 1 . 9 5 < 1 . 9 5 < 1 . 9 5 < 1 . 9 5 2. 0 1 <1.95 < 1 . 9 5 < 1 . 9 5 Ch l o r o m e t h a n e 7 , 8 8 0 < 0 . 8 2 6 < 0 . 8 2 6 < 0 . 8 2 6 < 0 . 8 2 6 < 0 . 8 2 6 1.5 4 1 . 3 1 1 . 2 8 7 . 3 9 <0 . 8 2 6 < 0 . 8 2 6 < 0 . 8 2 6 < 0 . 8 2 6 Cy c l o h e x a n e 5 2 6 , 0 0 0 13 . 1 7 . 6 8 1 3 . 6 5 0 . 3 1 1 . 2 8 . 0 2 <1 . 3 8 < 1 . 3 8 11 . 6 2 . 7 6 4 . 2 6 3 . 4 8 3 . 2 1, 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h a n e 4 7 2 11 . 4 1 4 . 3 2 1 . 2 <1 . 6 2 3. 4 <1 . 6 2 < 1 . 6 2 < 1 . 6 2 < 1 . 6 2 < 1 . 6 2 < 1 . 6 2 < 1 . 6 2 < 1 . 6 2 1, 1 - D i c h l o r o e t h a n e 7 , 6 7 0 < 1 . 6 < 1 . 6 < 1 . 6 18 5 <1 . 6 < 1 . 6 < 1 . 6 < 1 . 6 < 1 . 6 < 1 . 6 < 1 . 6 < 1 . 6 < 1 . 6 1, 1 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 7 , 5 0 0 < 1 . 5 9 < 1 . 5 9 < 1 . 5 9 30 . 5 <1 . 5 9 < 1 . 5 9 < 1 . 5 9 < 1 . 5 9 < 1 . 5 9 < 1 . 5 9 < 1 . 5 9 < 1 . 5 9 < 1 . 5 9 cis - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e N S 8. 6 6 9 . 6 2 8 . 1 1 <1 . 5 9 < 1 . 5 9 5.3 5 <1 . 5 9 < 1 . 5 9 < 1 . 5 9 < 1 . 5 9 < 1 . 5 9 < 1 . 5 9 < 1 . 5 9 1, 4 - D i o x a n e 2 , 4 5 0 < 1 . 4 4 < 1 . 4 4 < 1 . 4 4 < 1 . 4 4 5. 3 9 <1 . 4 4 < 1 . 4 4 7. 5 7 3 1 . 4 <1 . 4 4 < 1 . 4 4 < 1 . 4 4 < 1 . 4 4 Et h a n o l N S < 2 . 3 8 < 2 . 3 8 < 2 . 3 8 10 . 2 1 1 . 8 1 3 . 1 6 . 1 1 4 . 9 6 1 8 . 6 <2 . 3 8 8.11 1 2 . 6 6 . 7 2 Et h y l b e n z e n e 4 , 9 1 0 87 . 7 2 3 7 4 2 1 2 2 8 1 1 0 6 . 0 2 5 . 1 3 <1 . 7 3 30 5 2 . 0 1 3 . 3 3 . 5 3 2 . 3 9 4- E t h y l t o l u e n e N S 40 4 45 7 3 9 1 4 1 7 6 7 . 3 2 . 2 3 9 . 5 1 <1 . 9 6 28 9 <1 . 9 6 < 1 . 9 6 < 1 . 9 6 < 1 . 9 6 Tr i c h l o r o f l u o r o m e t h a n e N S 2. 4 9 3 . 0 3 4 . 1 2 <2 . 2 5 4. 4 8 <2 . 2 5 < 2 . 2 5 < 2 . 2 5 < 2 . 2 5 3. 1 2 <2.25 2.44 2 . 3 4 Di c h l o r o d i f l u o r o m e t h a n e 8 , 7 6 0 < 1 . 9 8 2. 2 1 2 . 2 2 . 1 5 2 . 2 5 2 . 4 4 2 . 5 8 2 . 4 1 2 . 0 1 2 2 . 0 8 2 . 0 7 <1.98 He p t a n e N S 23 . 1 1 6 . 1 2 6 . 4 1 0 7 4 1 . 9 8 . 1 7 <1 . 6 4 < 1 . 6 4 27 . 4 <1 . 6 4 < 1 . 6 4 < 1 . 6 4 < 1 . 6 4 N- H e x a n e 6 1 , 3 0 0 31 . 7 1 9 3 7 . 1 1 6 8 3 3 . 3 1 4 . 9 3 . 1 5 <1 . 4 1 17 . 8 4 . 7 6 <1.41 3.42 3 . 9 2 Is o p r o p y l b e n z e n e 3 5 13 3 1 2 8 1 3 6 1 3 9 3 0 . 9 <1 . 9 7 < 1 . 9 7 < 1 . 9 7 90 . 5 <1 . 9 7 < 1 . 9 7 < 1 . 9 7 < 1 . 9 7 Me t h y l e n e C h l o r i d e 5 2 , 6 0 0 1. 4 <1 . 3 9 1. 6 4 <1 . 3 9 < 1 . 3 9 < 1 . 3 9 < 1 . 3 9 < 1 . 3 9 1.9 1 <1 . 3 9 < 1 . 3 9 < 1 . 3 9 < 1 . 3 9 2- B u t a n o n e ( M e k ) 4 3 8 , 0 0 0 < 7 . 3 7 < 7 . 3 7 < 7 . 3 7 8. 5 9 1 3 . 2 <7 . 3 7 < 7 . 3 7 11 . 8 1 7 . 9 <7 . 3 7 < 7 . 3 7 81.6 6 8 . 6 4- M e t h y l - 2 - P e n t a n o n e ( M i b k ) 2 6 3 , 0 0 0 < 1 0 . 2 < 1 0 . 2 < 1 0 . 2 < 1 0 . 2 < 1 0 . 2 21 . 1 <1 0 . 2 < 1 0 . 2 < 1 0 . 2 < 1 0 . 2 < 1 0 . 2 15.8 1 4 . 3 Na p h t h a l e n e 2 6 3 9. 5 8 B 1 0 . 6 B 1 0 . 7 B 1 1 . 1 B 6 . 9 9 B <6 . 6 < 6 . 6 < 6 . 6 6. 8 9 B <6 . 6 < 6 . 6 8.76 B <6.6 2- P r o p a n o l 1 7 , 5 0 0 < 6 . 1 5 < 6 . 1 5 < 6 . 1 5 8. 2 <6 . 1 5 < 6 . 1 5 < 6 . 1 5 < 6 . 1 5 13 . 5 <6 . 1 5 < 6 . 1 5 10.9 <6.15 Pr o p e n e 2 6 3 , 0 0 0 60 . 8 4 1 1 0 2 5 8 9 8 3 . 6 1 8 . 4 5 . 9 1 <1 . 3 8 38 . 6 1 9 . 1 3 . 0 2 4 . 9 3 <1.38 St y r e n e 8 7 , 6 0 0 < 1 . 7 < 1 . 7 < 1 . 7 < 1 . 7 < 1 . 7 < 1 . 7 < 1 . 7 < 1 . 7 < 1 . 7 4. 7 9 <1.7 1.75 <1.7 Te t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e 3 , 5 0 0 69 . 2 6 4 . 9 8 6 . 5 9 3 2 2 . 9 5 . 6 8 <2 . 7 2 < 2 . 7 2 59 2 8 . 2 1 8 . 3 1 3 . 4 1 1 . 9 Te t r a h y d r o f u r a n 1 7 5 , 0 0 0 69 7 5 . 1 6 0 . 7 <1 . 1 8 < 1 . 1 8 < 1 . 1 8 < 1 . 1 8 4. 0 5 3 2 . 4 8 . 9 6 1 7 3 5 . 9 1 7 To l u e n e 4 3 8 , 0 0 0 21 6 5 6 4 54 9 5 6 7 2 0 2 1 5 . 6 1 6 . 1 2 . 6 6 7 1 1 8 1 4 . 9 1 6 . 4 8 . 9 7 Tr i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 7 5 48 4 0 1 6 3 0 0 2 0 6 0 0 3 2 1 0 1 4 6 4 7 . 1 4 2 3 . 9 6 5 9 . 4 7 . 1 9 <2.14 4.02 <2.14 1, 2 , 4 - T r i m e t h y l b e n z e n e 6 1 3 13 8 4 7 2 1 4 2 0 3 3 8 1 7 5 8 . 9 4 7 . 6 6 <1 . 9 6 85 3 5 . 6 3 . 3 2 3 . 7 2 2 . 2 1 1, 3 , 5 - T r i m e t h y l b e n z e n e N S < 9 8 . 2 29 0 5 8 0 2 0 9 9 0 . 4 6 . 6 1 5 . 9 4 <1 . 9 6 42 9 2 . 2 1 <1.96 < 1 . 9 6 < 1 . 9 6 2, 2 , 4 - T r i m e t h y l p e n t a n e N S 72 . 3 4 5 7 1 . 1 3 2 3 4 7 . 4 1 6 2 5 . 3 1 <1 . 8 7 38 . 2 <1 . 8 7 < 1 . 8 7 < 1 . 8 7 < 1 . 8 7 m& p - X y l e n e 8 , 7 6 0 26 7 7 9 0 7 1 2 6 8 3 3 1 9 2 6 . 8 1 9 . 3 <3 . 4 7 77 4 9. 9 9 1 0 . 4 1 0 . 1 8 . 0 7 o- X y l e n e 8 , 7 6 0 40 6 2 2 0 3 8 1 4 0 7 8 3 . 5 6 . 0 4 6 . 6 3 <1 . 7 3 27 9 2 . 6 5 3 . 3 8 3 . 6 2 2 . 6 1 Div i s i o n o f W a s t e M a n a g e m e n t N o n - R e s i d e n t i a l V a p o r I n t r u s i o n S c r e e n i n g C o n c e n t r a t i o n s f o r E x t e r i o r S o i l G a s , O c t o b e r 2 0 1 6 . Sa m p l e s a n a l y z e d b y S t a n d a r d M e t h o d T O - 1 5 . O n l y c o m p o u n d s d e t e c t e d a b o v e l a b o r a t o r y r e p o r t i n g l i m i t s i n c l u d e d i n t a b l e . SG S L = S o i l G a s S c r e e n i n g L e v e l . DU P - 0 1 - 1 0 2 8 2 0 1 6 c o l l e c t e d f r o m S V 2 0 1 6 - 1 . Sa m p l e s c o l l e c t e d o n 1 0 / 2 8 / 2 0 1 6 . Co n c e n t r a t i o n s r e p o r t e d i n u g / m 3 . Bo l d n u m b e r s i n d i c a t e d e t e c t e d c o m p o u n d s . Ex c e e d s N o n - R e s i d e n t i a l S G S L No t e s Soil Gas Investigation Report 60537015 Prepared for: Parker Hannifin, Cleveland, OH AECOM Figures SITE Map Location March 2016 60489813 Former Parker Hannifin Corp. Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed Topographic Site Location Map Figure 1 0 2,000 4,000Feet NC SC VA GA TN KY WV USGS Topographic Quadrangle Wake Forest (1983) AECOM1600 Perimeter Park DriveSuite 400Morrisville, NC 27560Phone: (919) 461-1100Fax: (919) 461-1415www.aecom.com . 1:24,000 X: \ D C S \ P r o j e c t s \ L - A E C O M \ G e o m a t i c s \ G I S \ P r o j e c t s \ P \ P a r k e r _ H a n n i f i n \ W a k e _ F o r e s t _ N C \ M X D \ F i g u r e _ 1 - 1 _ S i t e _ L o c a t i o n _ T o p o _ 2 0 1 6 . m x d Former Parker Hannifin Corporation Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Project No.: 60489831 SOIL VAPOR TCE ANALYTICAL RESULTS OCTOBER 2016 Figure: 2Date: 03/24/2017 L E G E N D S V 2 0 1 6 - 3 S O I L V A P O R S A M P L E L O C A T I O N ( O C T . 2 0 1 6 ) E X C E E D A N C E O F I N D U S T R I A L N O N - R E S I D E N T I A L P S R G F O R T C E ( 1 7 5 µ g / m ³ ) D A S H E D W H E R E I N F E R R E D < 2 . 1 4 T C E C O N C E N T R A T I O N P H A S E 1 R E D E V E L O P M E N T A R E A S O F C O N C E R N INTERNATIONAL Parker Hannifin Corporation Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Soil Vapor Sampling, Indoor Air Modeling, and Risk Evaluation Report ENSR Consulting and Engineering, (NC), Inc. Project 05303-004 October 2004 NOV 4-2004 TABLES e Table 2-1 Analytical Soil Vapor Results (a) Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina . . .. . ~pound 1,1, 1-Trichloroethane ••• 1,1 ,2-Trichloro-1 ,2,2-trilluoroethane (Freon 113) 1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone) Acetone carbon disulfide Carbon Tetrachloride Chloroform Chloromethane cis-1 ,2-dichloroethene Cydohexane Ethyl acetate Isopropanol m,p-Xylene Methyl tert-butyl ether Methylene chlooide Tetrachloroethene Tetrahydrofuran Toluene Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11) . Units ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 Notes: .. . :. •,• .. •:· d -Duplicate sample. E -Value exceeded upper range of ca(ipration; U -Not detected above specified reporting llmK. Blanks. indicate the compound was not anal~ for. (a) R<!l!UKs are reported for oompounds deteded et least Once In SOil vapor. ·.·.•· . . SV-1. ' , .S:V-1 81212!!!14 911012004: 55 u 47 u 6700 1300 49 u 42 u 29 u 25 u 24 u 82 u 31 u 27 u 63 u 54U 75 61 21 u 71 u 140 98 34U 30 u 36 u 260 85 u 87 u 38 u 36 u 31 u 69 u 30 u 4100 5400 29 u 25 u 38 u 32 u 17000 E 18000 120 48 u e . ... . SV-2 : .... . .. · . sv-2 . SV-2 Duplicate SV·Zt! SV~, SV.-3 .31212004 •911012004 911012004 911012004 31212004 911012004 110 240 u 130 230 u 55 u 5.8 u 21000 E 20000 22000 20000 77 u 8.1 u 49 u 210 u 110 u 200 u 49 u 5.2 u 29U 130 u 64U 120 u 490 3.1 u 24 u 410 u 200 u 400U 240 10 u 31 u 130 u 67 u 130 u 260 3.3 u 63 u 270 u 140 u 260 u 63 u 6.7 u 49 u 210 u 220 200 49 u 5.2 u 21 u 360 u 180 u 340 u 21 u 8.8 u 1400 1100 1300 1200 40 u 16 34U 150 u 74 u 140 u 100 3.6 u 36 u 47 25 u 420 u 210 u 410 u 97 10 u 87 u 190 u 94U 180 u 87 u 4.6 u 36 u 160 u 78 u 150 u 36U 3.8 u 69 u 150 u 75 u 140 u 120 3.7 u 11000 E 21000 22000 20000 68 u 29 29 u 130 u 64U 120 u 29 u 3.1 u 38 u 160 u 82 u 160 u 620 4 u 31000 E 48000 53000 E 47000 500 640 290 450 490 430 56 u 6 u . .·······. J:llndi_Service\Project Files1Par1<er Hannifin\Wake Forest, NC Site\ Vapor Intrusion Wor1<1Scenario 1_existing on-site\Soil Vapor Data Summary.xls e Page 1 of2 SV-4 SV-4 . sv.s ~· 9110121Jo4: :911012004 : 55 u 48 u 23 u : 77U 67 u 32 u I 49 u 43 u 21 u 29U 26 u 12 u 24 u 64U 40 u 31 u 27 u 13 u 430 160 27 u . 82 44 21 u 39 73 u 35 u 190 110 17 u 34U 30 u 15 u 36 u 25 u 86U 42 u 87 u 38 u 18 u 36U 32 u 15 u 69 u 30 u 15 u 220 61 29 u 29 u 26 u 12 u 38 u 33 u 16 u 27000 E 14000 8800 56 u 49 u 24 u -:-- October, 2004 Table 2-1 Analytical Soil Vapor Results (a) Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina .••. •.····· ·.• .·· <> .i .. . .. ;. ·.• •. •.. . : ili • ••.. " .• ; . • •.. •·.• 1,1,1-Trichloroethane · 1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane (Freon 113) 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone) Acetone Carbon disulfide Carbon Tetrachloride Chlorofonn Chloromethane cis-1,2-dichloroethene Cydohexane Ethyl acetate Isopropanol m,p-Xylene Methyl tart-butyl ether Methylene chloride Tetrachloroethane Tetrahydrofuran Toluene T richloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11) ~: .. · .. ... . ·•:: ...... d :: [)uplicl!te ~pie. ·.. .. . . . . . . ~=-~~~Pfletrar?>~C~Jti~. u -Not deteCted~ specified~ fiiJrit ••••• • ••• :unb uglm3 uglm3 uglm3 uglm3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 uglm3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 uglm3 ug/m3 ug/m3 uglm3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 Btanl<s indicl!te the~ waS nOt~ for. (a) Results are repolle<j rOr cornp<>Unds detecte,<! ~;~t ie<lst once in soil vapOr. ·.· • · · · · ·. sV'-6 •• fit,7 911or.IQI)4 liltQi2o!U 390 u 120 u 550 u 370 350 u 110 u 210 u 64U 680 u 200 u 220 u 67 u 450 u 140 u 350 u 100 u 600 u 180 u 290 u 510 250 u 74 u 710 u 210 u 310 u 94U 260 u 78 u 250 u 75 u 490 u 2100 210 u 84U 270 u 82 u 110000 26000 400 u 120 u . . • ... ·· .... r ···. • .... .. L< . .. ····.T &V'-41. .. . ...... ll'l111 S\'"11 •· SV-11d. svoe.: 911~ $/i~ 11110120114 911or.IQI)4 ;li/1012011,4 240 u 2300 u 46 u 120 u 120 u 330 u 3200 u 65 u 160 u 160 u 210 u 2000 u 42 u 100 u 110 u 130 u 1200 u 25 u 63 u 64U 410 u 4000 u 81 u 200 u 200 u 130 u 1300 u 26 u 66U 67 u 270 u 2600 u 53 u 130 u 140 u 210 u 2000 u 54 100 u 100 u 360 u 3400 u 70 u 180 u 180 u 170 u 1600 u 34U 64U 86U 150 u 1400 u 29 u 73 u 74 u 420 u 4100 u 84U 210 u 210 u 190 u 1800 u 37 u 92 u 94U 160 u 1500 u 31 u 76 u 78 u 150 u 1400 u 30 u 74 u 75 u 650 2800 u 58U 140 u 150 u 130 u 1200 u 25 u 63 u 64U 160 u 1600 u 32 u 80 u 82 u 75000 390000 15000 30000 32000 240 u 2300 u 48U 120 u 120 u . · . ........ ·····•· . -:-:c·· .. . .. :· .... !:x · .. J:llndi_.\Projed Files\Parl<er Hannifin\Wake Forest, NC Site\Vapor Intrusion Wort<\Scenario 1_e. on-site\Soil Vapor Data Summary.xls Page2of2 t~·< • < •.. . sv,12 .SV"13 S!M<t• I $.v,1~ !111. 0120114 911012004. ···$11~· 1111~ 790 u 5.8 u 5.9 u 46U 1100 u 8.1 u 8.3 u 65 u 710 u 5.2 u 12 42 u 420 u 6.2 10 25 u 1400 u 43 69 81 u 450 u 3.3 u 3.4 u 26U 910 u 6.7 u 6.8 u 53 u 810 5.2 u 26 45 1200 u 8.8 u 8.9 u 70 u 570 u 4.2 u 4.3 u 34U 500U 3.6 u 3.7 u 29 u 1400 u 10 u 11 u 83 u 630 u 4.6 u 6 37 u 520 u 3.8 u 6.6 30 u 500 u 3.7 u 3.8 u 29 u 980 u 7.2 u 120 1400 420 u 13 20 25 u 540 u 4 u 4.1 u 32 u 200000 13 21 10000 810 u 6 u 54 48 u . ;-::- ····· . .··•·· ::·.·· ...... • •• . . ... ·. ·· .. . .· . October,2~ e e Table3-1a Summary Statistics for Compounds Detected In Soil Vapor-September 2004 Sampling Event Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Minimum Maximum Detected Detected FOD Concentration Concentration Area (a) Compound (b) CAS Units (c) (d) (e) Heating room cis-1 ,2-0ichloroethene 156-59-2 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 1.60E-f{l1 1.60E-f{l1 T elrachloroethene 127-18-4 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 2.90E-f{l1 2.90E-f{l1 T richloroethene 79-01-6 uglm3 1 : 1 : 1 6.40E-f{l2 6.40E-f{l2 Main plant 1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 ug/m3 1:7:8 1.22E-f{l2 1.22E-f{l2 1,1 ,2-Trichloro-1 ,2,2-lrilluoroethane (Freon 113 76-13-1 ug/m3 3:8:8 3.70E-f{l2 2.07E<{)4 Chloroform 67-66-3 ug/m3 4:7:8 4.50E-f{l1 1.75E-f{l2 cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 ug/m3 3:8:8 9.80E-f{l1 1.20E-f{l3 Telrachloroethene 127-18-4 ug/m3 5:8:8 6.50E-f{l2 2.10E<{)4 T richloroethene 79-01-6 uglm3 8:8:8 1.00E<{)4 3.90E-f{l5 Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11) 75-69-4 ug/m3 1:7:8 4.57E-f{l2 4.57E-f{l2 Offices 2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone) 78-93-3 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 6.20E-f{IO 6.20E-f{IO Acetone 67-64-1 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 4.30E-f{l1 4.30E-f{l1 T etrahydrofuran 109-99-9 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 1.30E-f{l1 1.30E-f{l1 T richloroethene 79-01-6 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 1.30E-f{l1 1.30E-f{l1 Plating room Calbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 ug/m3 1 :2:3 1.60E-f{l2 1.60E-f{l2 Chloroform 67-66-3 ug/m3 1:2:3 4.40E-f{l1 4.40E-f{l1 cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene 158-59-2 ug/m3 1:2:3 1.10E-f{l2 1.10E-f{l2 T etrachloroethene 127-18-4 ug/m3 1:2:3 6.10E-f{l1 6.10E-f{l1 T richloroethene 79-01-6 ug/m3 3:3:3 8.80E-f{l3 1.10E-f{l5 Warehouse_east Chloroform 67-66-3 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 8.10E-f{l2 8.10E-f{l2 T richloroethene 79-01-6 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 2.00E-f{l5 2.00E-f{l5 J:\lndi_Service\Projed Files\Par1<er Hannifin\Wake Forest, NC Sije\Vapor Intrusion Wor1< e Page 1 of2 Location of Mean Maximum Concentration Detected (f) Concentration . 1.60E-f{l1 SV-3 2.90E-f{l1 SV-3 6.40E-f{l2 SV-3 6.16E-f{l1 SV-2 3.03E-f{l3 SV-2 7.71E-f{l1 SV-2 3.46E-f{l2 SV-2 4.01E-f{l3 SV-2 7.70E<{)4 SV-9 1.10E-f{l2 SV-2 6.20E-f{IO SV-13 4.30E-f{l1 SV-13 1.30E-f{l1 SV-13 1.30E-f{l1 SV-13 8.68E-f{l1 SV-4 2.73E-f{l1 SV-4 5.93E-f{l1 SV-4 3.78E-f{l1 SV-4 4.43E<{)4 SV-6 J 8.10E-f{l2 SV-12 2.00E-f{l5 SV-12 October, 2004 Table 3-1a Summary Statistics for Compounds Detected in Soil Vapor-September 2004 Sampling Event Parker Hannifin Facility · Wake Forest, North Carolina Minimum Maximum Detected Detected Mean FOD Concentration Concentration Concentration Area (a) Compound (b) CAS Units Warehouse_west 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 ug/m3 2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone) 78-93-3 ughn3 Acetone 67-64-1 ughn3 Chloroform 6Hi6-3 uglm3 m,p-Xylene 1-38-31106-4: ugJm3 Methyl tert-bueyJ elher 1634-04-4 uglm3 T etrachloroethene 127-18-4 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 T richloroethene 79-01-6 Trichlorolltwromethane (Freon 11) 75-69-4 Notes: CAS -Chemical Abstract Service. (a) Samples induded in each exposure area are as follows: Heating room: SV-3; Main plant SV-1, SV-2, SV-7, SV-8, SV-9, SV-10, SV-11, SV-15; Offices: SV-13 Plating room: SV-4, SV-5, SV-6; Warehouse (east): SV-12; Warehouse (west): SV-14. uglm3 uglm3 uglm3 ug/m3 (b) Only compounds detected at least once in each area are presented. (c) (d) (e) 1 : 1 : 1 1.20E..01 1.20E..01 1 : 1 : 1 1.00E..01 1.00E..01 1 : 1 : 1 6.90E..01 6.90E..01 1 : 1 : 1 2.60E..01 2.60E..01 1 : 1 : 1 6.00E+OO 6.00E..OO 1 : 1 : 1 6.60E..OO 6.60E..OO 1 : 1 : 1 1.20E..o2 1.20E..02 1 : 1 : 1 2.00E..01 2.00E..01 1 : 1 : 1 2.10E..01 2.10E..01 1 : 1 : 1 5.40E..01 5.40E..01 (c) Frequency of detection -Number of detected samples: Number of samples used to calculate statistics: Number of total samples. (d) Minimum detected concentration for each compound, after duplicates have been averaged. (e) Maximum detected concentration for each compound, after duplicates have been averaged. (f) 1.20E..01 1.00E..01 6.90E..01 2.60E..01 6.00E..OO 6.60E..OO 1.20E..02 2.00E..01 2.10E..01 5.40E..01 l«ationof Maximum Detected Concentration SV-14 SV-14 SV-14 SV-14 SV-14 SV-14 SV-14 SV-14 SV-14 SV-14 (f) Arithmetic mean concentration for each compound, after duplicates have been averaged and any non detected resulls with a sample quantitation limit greater than the maximum detected concentration have been exduded. J:llndi_Service\Project Files\Parker Hannifin\Wake Forest, NC Site\Vapor Intrusion Work October, 2004 e e Page2 of2 e e e Table3-1b Summary Statistics for Compounds Detected In Soil Vapor-August 2004 Sampling Event Parker Hannlfin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Minimum Maximum Detected Detected FOD Concentration Concentration Area (a) Compound (b) CAS Units (c) (d) (e) Heating room 2-Butanooe {Methyl Ethyl Kellllle) 78-93-3 ug/m3 1: 1 : 1 4.90E-t02 4.90E-t02 Acetone 67-64-1 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 2.40E-t02 2.40E-t02 Carbon Disulfide 75-15-0 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 2.60E-t02 2.60E-t02 Cyctohexane 110-82-7 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 1.00E-t02 1.00E-t02 Ethyl Acetate 141-78-6 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 4.70E-t01 4.70E-t01 Isopropanol 67-63-0 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 9.70E-t01 9.70E-t01 Methylene Chloride 75-09-2 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 1.20E-t02 1.20E-t02 Toluene 108-88-3 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 6.20E-t02 6.20E-t02 T richloroethene 79-01-6 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 5.00E-t02 5.00E-t02 Main plant 1,1,1-Trichloroelhane 71-55-6 ug/m3 1 :2:2 1.10E-t02 1.10E-t02 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane (Freon 113) 76-13-1 ug/m3 2:2:2 6.70E-t03 2.10E-t04 Chloroform 67-66-3 uglm3 1:2:2 7.50E-t01 7.50E-t01 cis-1,2-Dich/oroethene 156-59-2 ug/m3 2:2:2 1.40E-t02 1.40E-t03 Isopropanol 67-63-0 ug/m3 1 :2:2 2.60E-t02 2.60E-t02 T etrachloroethene 127-18-4 ug/m3 2:2:2 4.10E-t03 1.10E-t04 T richloroelhene 79-01-6 ug/m3 2:2:2 1.70E-t04 3.10E-t04 T richlorofluoromethane (Freon 11) 75-69-4 ug/m3 2:2:2 1.20E-t02 2.90E-t02 Plating room Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 4.30E-t02 4.30E-t02 Chloroform 67-66-3 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 8.20E-t01 8.20E-t01 Chloromethane 74-87-3 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 3.90E-t01 3.90E-t01 cis-1,2-Dichloroelhene 156-59-2 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 1.90E-t02 1.90E-t02 T etrachloroethene 127-18-4 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 2.20E-t02 2.20E-t02 Trichloroelhene 79-01-6 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 2.70E-t04 2.70E-t04 J:llndi_Service\Project Files\Parker Hannifin\Wake Forest, NC Stte\Vapor Intrusion Work - Page 1 of2 Location of Mean Maximum Concentration Detected (f) Concentration 4.90E-t02 SV-3 2.40E-t02 SV-3 2.60E-t02 SV-3 1.00E-t02 SV-3 4.70E-t01 SV-3 9.70E-t01 SV-3 1.20E-t02 SV-3 6.20E-t02 SV-3 5.00E-t02 SV-3 6.88E-t01 SV-2 1.39E-t04 SV-2 4.98E-t01 SV-1 7.70E-t02 SV-2 1.36E-t02 SV-1 7.55E-t03 SV-2 2.40E-t04 SV-2 2.05E-t02 SV-2 4.30E-t02 SV-4 8.20E-t01 SV-4 3.90E-t01 SV-4 1.90E-t02 SV-4 2.20E-t02 SV-4 2.70E-t04 SV-4 October, 2004 Table 3-1b Summary Statistics for Compounds Detected in Soil Vapor-August 2004 Sampling Event Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Minimum Maximum~~ Detected Detected Mean FOD Concentration Concentration Concentration Area (a) Compound (b) Notes: CAS-Chemical Abstract Service. (a) Samples induded in each exposure area are as follows: Heating room: SV-3; Main plant: SV-1, SV-2; Plating room: SV-4; CAS Units (c) (d) (e) (b) Only compounds detected at least once in each area are presented. (c) Frequency of detection-Number of detected samples: Number of samples used to calculate statistics: Number of total samples. (d) Minimum detected concentration for each compound, after duplicates have been averaged. (f) Locatio~n oT Maximum Detected Concentration (e) Maximum detected concentration for each compound, after duplicates have been averaged. (f) Arithmetic mean concentration for each compound, after duplicates have been averaged and any non detected resulls with a sample quantltation limit greater than the maximum detected concentration have been exduded. J:llndi_Service\Project Files\Pa!Ker Hannifin\Wake Forest, NC Site\Vapor Intrusion WorK October, 2004 e e Page 2 of2 - e Table 3-2a Selection of COPCs in Soil Vapor -September 2004 Sampling Event Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina e Maximum Detected FOD Concentration Area (a) Compound (b) CAS Units (c) (d) Heating room cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 1.60E+01 T e1rachloroe1hene 127-18-4 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 2.90E+01 T richloroethene 79-01-6 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 6.40E+02 Main plant 1,1, 1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 ug/m3 1:7:8 1.22E+02 1,1 ,2-T richloro-1 ,2,2-trifluoroethane {Freon 113 76-13-1 ug/m3 3:8:8 2.07E+04 Chloroform 67-66-3 ug/m3 4:7:8 1.75E+02 cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 ug/m3 3:8:8 1.20E+03 T etrachloroethene 127-18-4 ug/m3 5:8:8 2.10E+04 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 ug/m3 8:8:8 3.90E+05 T richlorofluoromethane {Freon 11) 75-69-4 ug/m3 1:7:8 4.57E+02 Offices 2-Butanone {Methyl Ethyl Ketone) 78-93-3 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 6.20E+OO Acetone 67-64-1 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 4.30E+01 T etrahydrofuran 109-99-9 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 1.30E+01 Trichloroethane 79-01-6 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 1.30E+01 Plating room Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 ug/m3 1:2:3 1.60E+02 Chloroform 67-66-3 ug/m3 1:2:3 4.40E+01 cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 ug/m3 1:2:3 1.10E+02 T etrachloroethene 127-18-4 uglm3 1:2:3 6.10E+01 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 ug/m3 3:3:3 1.10E+05 Warehouse_east Chloroform 67-66-3 uglm3 1 : 1 : 1 8.10E+02 T richloroethene 79-01-6 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 2.00E+05 J:llndi_Service\Project Files\Parker Hannifin\Wake Forest, NC Site\Vapor Intrusion Work e Page 1 of2 Soil Vapor I Screening Level COPC? (e) (f) ! I I 3.50E+02 No 8.10E+OO Yes 2.20E-01 Yes 220E+04 No 3.00E+05 No 1.10E+00 Yes 3.50E+02 Yes 8.10E+OO Yes 2.20E-01 Yes 7.00E+03 No 1.00E+04 No 3.50E+03 No NA Yes 2.20E-01 Yes 1.60E+OO Yes 1.10E+OO Yes 3.50E+02 No 8.10E+00 Yes 2.20E-01 Yes 1.10E+OO Yes 2.20E-01 Yes October, 2004 Table3-2a Selection of COPCs in Soil Vapor -September 2004 Sampling Event Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Maximum Detected FOD Concentration Area (a) Compound (b) CAS Units Warehouse _west 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 uglm3 2-Bu1anone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone) 7S-!n-3 uglm3 Acetone 67-64-1 uglm3 Chlorofoon 67-66-3 ug/m3 m,p-Xylene ~JS-31106-4: ug/m3 Methyl tert-bulyl ether 1634-04-4 ug/m3 T etrachloroethene T etrahydrofuran Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11) Notes: CAS -Chemical Abstract Service. COPC -Compound of potential concern. (a) Samples included in each exposure area are as follows: Heating room: SV-3; 127-1&-4 109-99-9 79-01-6 75-69-4 Main plant: SV-1, SV-2, SV-7, SV-8, SV-9, SV-10, SV-11, SV-15; Offices: SV-13 Plating room: SV-4, SV-5, SV-6; Warehouse (east): SV-12; Warehouse (west): SV-14. ug/mJ ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 (b) Only compounds detected at least once in each area are presented. (c) (d) 1 : 1 : 1 1.20E..01 1 : 1 : 1 1.00E..01 1 : 1 : 1 6.90E..01 1 : 1 : 1 2.60E..01 1 : 1 : 1 6.00E..OO 1 : 1 : 1 6.60E..OO 1 : 1 : 1 1.20E..02 1 : 1 : 1 2.00E..01 1 : 1 : 1 2.10E..01 1 : 1 : 1 5.40E..01 Soil Vapor Screening Level (e) 6.00E..01 1.00E-o04 3.50E-o03 1.10E..OO 7.00E-o04 3.00E-o04 8.10E..OO NA 2.20E-01 7.00E-o03 (c) Frequency of detection-Number of detected samples: Number of samples used to calculate statistics: Number of total samples. (d) Maximum detected concentration for each compound, after duplicates have been averaged. (e) Target Shallow Soil Gas Concentration Corresponding to Target Indoor Air Concentration. Table 2c: Generic Screening Levels corresponding to a target risk of 1x10-6. (f) A compound is identified as a COPC in soil vapor if its maximum detected concentration is greater than the screening level. J:llndi_Service\Project Files\Parker Hannifin\Wake Forest, NC Site\Vapor Intrusion Work e e Page 2 of2 COPC? (f) No No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No October, 2004 e e Table3-2b Selection of COPCs in Soil Vapor-August 2004 Sampling Event Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina FOD Area (a) Compound (b) CAS Units (c) Heating room 2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone) 78-93-3 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 Aoetone 67-64-1 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 caroon Disulfide 75-15-0 uglm3 1 : 1 : 1 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 Ethyl Acetate 141-78-6 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 Isopropanol 67-63-0 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 Methylene Chkxide 75-09-2 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 Toluene 108-88-3 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 Trichloroethane 79-01-6 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 Main plant 1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 uglm3 1:2:2 1,1 ,2-Trichloro-1 ,2,2-trifluoroethane (Freon 113 76-13-1 ug/m3 2:2:2 Chloroform 67-66-3 ug/m3 1:2:2 cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 ug/m3 2:2:2 Isopropanol 67-63-0 ug/m3 1:2:2 T etrachloruethene 127-18-4 uglm3 2:2:2 T richloroethene 79-01-6 uglm3 2:2:2 Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11) 75-69-4 ug/m3 2:2:2 Plating room Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 uglm3 1 : 1 : 1 Chlorofo"" 67-66-3 uglm3 1 : 1 : 1 Chloromethane 74-87-3 uglm3 1 : 1 : 1 cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 Tetrachloroethane 127-18-4 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 T richloroethene 79-01-6 ug/m3 1 : 1 : 1 J:llndi_Service\Project Files\Parker Hannifin\Wake Forest, NC Site\Vapor Intrusion Work e e Page 1 of2 Maximum Soil Vapor Detected Screening Concentration Level COPC? (d) (e) (f) 4.90E.02 1.00E.o4 No 2.40E.02 3.50E.03 No 2.60E.02 7.00E.03 No 1.00E.02 NA Yes 4.70E.01 320E.o4 No 9.70E.01 NA No (g) 1.20E.02 520E.01 Yes 6.20E.02 4.00E.03 No 5.00E.02 2.20E-01 No (h) 1.10E.02 2.20E.o4 No 2.10E.o4 3.00E..05 No 7.50E.01 1.10E..OO No (h) 1.40E..o3 3.50E..02 No (h) 2.60E..02 NA No(g) 1.10E.o4 8.10E..OO No (h) 3.10E.o4 2.20E-01 No(h) 2.90E.02 7.00E.03 No I I 4.30E.02 1.60E..OO No(h) 8.20E.01 1.10E..OO No(h) 3.90E..01 2.40E..01 Yes 1.90E.02 3.50E.02 No 2.20E.02 8.10E..OO No(h) 2.70E.o4 220E-01 No(h) October, 2004 Table 3-2b Selection of COPCs in Soil Vapor -August 2004 Sampling Event Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Area (a) Compound (b) Notes: CAS -Chemical Abstract Service. COPC -Compound of potential concern. (a) Samples included in each exposure area are as follows: Heating room: SV-3; Main plant SV-1, SV-2; Plating room: SV-4; CAS FOD Units (c) (b) Only compounds detected at least once in each area are presented. Maxtmuin Detected Concentration (d) Soil Vapor Screening Level (e) (c) Frequency of detection-Number of detected samples: Number of samples used to calculate statistics: Number of total samples. (d) Maximum detected concentration for each compound, after duplicates have been averaged. (e) Target Shallow Soil Gas Concentration Corresponding to Target Indoor Air Concentration. Table 2c: Generic Screening Levels corresponding to a target risk of 1x10-6. COPC? (f) (f) A compound is identified as a COPC in soil vapor if it was not detected in the September 2004 sampling event and its maximum detected concentration is greater than the screening level. (g) Isopropanol is not identified as a COPC because ~was introduced during field sampling and is not considered ~a-related. (h) These compounds are not identified as COPCs because they were detected in the soil vapor samples collected in the September 2004 sampling event These compounds are already being evaluated using the September 2004 soil vapor data, as discussed in the text J:\lndi_Service\Project Files\Parker Hannifin\Wake Forest, NC Site\Vapor Intrusion Work e - Page 2 of2 October, 2004 e e Table3-3 Doae-Response Information For Compounds With Potanttal Noncarcinogenic Effects Through The Inhalation Route Parbr Hanntfln Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Inhalation Refe,.nce Reference EPA CAS llose-l<espo11S8 Concentration (Last Verfllod) Confidence Compound Number Value {mglka-day) (mgfm'J TYIIO Laval Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 5.71E-04 NA NCEA(c) NA Chloroform 67-66-3 1.43E-<l2 (a) S.OOE-<12 NCEA (1122103) LOW/MEDIUM cis-1,2·Dtchloroethene 156-59-2 1.00E-02 NA(d) PPRTV (6/2004}-R LOW Chloromethane 74-87-3 2.57E-<>2 9.00E-<l2 IRIS (1 012004) MEDIUM Cydohexane 110-82-7 1.71E+OO 6.00E+OO IRIS (1012004) LOW/MEDIUM e Target Orglnl Critical Effect atLOAEL NA Liver, kidney and CNS effects Blood Effeds Cerebellar Lesions Reduced pup weights Methylene chloride 75-09-2 1.14E-<l1 4.00E-<l1 CAREL NA CardiovasaJiar and nervous system toxicity Tetmchloroethene 127-18-4 1.40E-01 (a) 4.90E-01 NCEA(c) MEDIUM Hepatotoxicity and renal to»c:ity Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 8.60E-<>2 NA NCEA(C) NA NA T richloroethene 79-01-6 1.00E-02 (a) 4.00E-02 (b) NA CNS. liver. endocrine Notes: CA REL-California's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Chronic Reference Exposure Levels. August, 2003. CAS-Chemical Abstracts Service. CNS-Central Nerwus System. LOAEL-Lowest Observed Adverse Etrects Level. R -Route to route extrapolation from oral reference dose. R1C-Reference Concentration. RfDi -Inhalation Reference Dose. IRIS -Integrated Risk lnfonnatlon System, an on-line computer database of toxicological information (US EPA, 2004a). NA-Not available. NCEA-National Center for Environmental Assessment PPRTV-Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values for Superfund, an on-line computer database of provisional, peer-reviewed toxicological information (US EPA, 2004). (a) Converted from the reference concentration as follows: RfDi (mgncg-day) = RfC (mglm3) * (20m"/day/70kg). (b) Tridlloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Characterization. EPAJ600/p-01/002A. August 2001. Personal communication (USEPA, July 9, 2003). {c) As referenced in the USEPA Region 3 Risk-Based Concentration Table. April14, 2004. (d) Route-to-route extrapolation of oral reference dose. e Study Study Animal Method NA NA MOUSE INHALATION RAT ORAL:GAVAGE MOUSE INHAlATION RAT REPROOUCTIVE:DEVELOPMENTAL NA NA MOUSE INHALATION NA NA HUMAN INHALATION:OCCUPATIONAL October, 2004 J:\Jndi_Service\Projed. Files\Parker Hannifin\Wake Forest, NC Site\Vapor Intrusion Work\Risk Tables_SVEval.xlsORNCI Table J.4 Dose-Response Information For Compounds Wolh Potential Carcinogenic E- Parker Hannlfin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina EPA Inhalation CAS Carcinogen CSF (a) Compound Number Class (mglkg-dayr' Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 B2 5.25E-02 Chlorofonn 67-66-3 B2 8.05E-02 (a) cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 D NA Chloromethane 74-87-3 D NA Cyclohexane 110-62-7 NA NA Methylene chloride 75-09-2 82 1.65E-03 Tetrachloroethene 127-16-4 NA 2.10E-02 T etrahydrofuran 109-99-9 NA 6.80E-03 Trichloroethane 79-01-6 NA 4.00E-01 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 NA 7.00E-03 Notes: A -Human carcinogen. C -Possible human carcinogen. Inhalation Unit Risk (mglm'r' 1.50E-02 2.30E-02 NA NA NA 4.70E-04 5.90E-03 NA 1.14E-01 2.00E-03 CA-California Cancer Potency Values. Ollice of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment June 2, 2004. CAS-Chemical Abstracts Service. CSF -Cancer Slope Fador. D-Not classifiable as to human carcinogenicity. Inhalation CSF Reference (Last Verified) IRIS (912004) IRIS (912004) NA NA NA IRIS (1012004) (e) NCEA (I) (d) CA(6/2004) IRIS -Integrated Risk lntormation System, an online computer database of toxicological inft>mation (USEPA, 2004a). NA -Not available. NCEA -National Center tor Environmental Assessment (a) Converted from the inhalation un~ risk as follows: CSF {mglkg-day)"1 = UR (mglm3)'1 • (70 kg/20m3/day). (b) Based on continuous lifetime exposure from birth. (c) Based on continuous lifetime exposure during adulthood (tor evaluating worker exposure). Inhalation Inhalation CSF CSF Study Animal Study Method HAMSTER/MOUSE INHALATION, GAVAGE MOUSE ORAL:GAVAGE NA NA NA NA NA NA MOUSE INHALATION MOUSE INHALATION NA NA HUMAN ORAL:DRINKING WATER NA NA (d) Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment synthesis and charaderization. EPA/600/p-01/002A. August 2001. Personal communication (USEPA, July 9, 2003). Upper end of range ofCSFs (0.02 to 0.4 (mg/kg-day)-1. (e) The NCEA has tor the interim adopted the California EPA dose-response values for tetrachloroethylene. Personal communication (USEPA, July 9, 2003). (I) As referenced in the USEPA Region 3 Risk-Based Concentration Table. April14, 2004. Odobei J:Undl_l?"rv.ject Files\Parker Hannilin\Wske Forest, NC Sita\Vapor Intrusion Work\Risk Tables_SVEval.x. Table 3-5 Exposure Parameters Pariler Hannlfln Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Exposure Parameter Exposure Time Exposure Frequency Exposure Duration Inhalation Rate Body Weight Notes: Units hours/day days/year years m3 air/hr kg On-site Adult Woriler 8 250 25 1.6 70 Except where noted, exposure parameters are taken from USEPA Region 4 guidance - Human Health Risk Assessment Bulletins-Supplement to RAGS (2000). (a) -Recommended mean inhalation rate for adults performing moderate activities (Table 5-23) USEPA, Exposure Factors Handbook (1997). (a) October, 2004 J:llndi_Service\Project Files\Parker Hannifin\Wake Forest. NC Site\Vapor Intrusion Work\Risk Tables_SVEval.xls T6-Exposure Parameters Table 3-6 Exposure Point Concentrations In Soli Vapor and Indoor Air Parker Hannlfln Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Soil Vapor Concentration (ug/m3) Area/Comnound IIIII CAS lbl Heating Room Cyclohexane 110-82-7 1.00E+02 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 1.20E+02 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 2.90E+01 Trichloroethane 79-01-6 6.40E+02 Main Plant Chloroform 67-66-3 7.71E+01 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 3.46E+02 Tetrachloroethane 127-18-4 4.01E+03 Trichloroethane 79-01-6 7.70E+04 ~ Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 1.30E+01 Trichloroethane 79-01-6 1.30E+01 Plating Room Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 8.68E+01 Chloroform 67-66-3 2.73E+01 Chloromethane 74-87-3 3.90E+01 Tetrachloroethane 127-18-4 3.78E+01 Trichloroethane 79-01-6 4.43E+04 lr:Y§rebou~ (~!!§! §!i~l Chloroform 67-66-3 8.10E+02 Trichloroethane 79-01-6 2.00E+05 lr:Y§reboY~!! (yt!!st s!l;!e l Chloroform 67-66-3 2.60E+01 Tetrachloroethane 127-18-4 1.20E+02 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 2.00E+01 Trichloroethane 79-01-6 2.10E+01 Notes: NA. Not applicable. (d) (d) (d) (a) The exposure areas are made up of the following sub-slab soil vapor samples: Heating room: SV-3; Main plant: SV-1, SY-2, SV-7, SV-8, SV-9, SV-10, SV-11, SV-15; Offices: SV-13 Plating room: SV-4,· SV-5, SV-6; Warehouse (east si~e): SV-12; Predicted Indoor Air Concentration lua/m3llcl 1.06E-02 1.27E-02 3.08E-02 6.92E-01 8.17E-03 3.64E-02 4.21E-01 8.12E+OO 2.76E-02 2.54E-02 3.30E-02 1.06E-02 4.14E-03 1.43E-02 1.69E+01 2.34E-01 5.70E+01 7.52E-03 3.40E-02 5.78E-03 5.99E-03 Warehouse (west s!de): SV-14. (b) Soil vapor con~ntrations are arithmetic mean concentrations from the September 2004 sampling event (except as indicated otherwise) within the exposure area. (c) Predicted using !he U.S. EPA Version of the Johnson and Ettinger Model, SG-ADV (3/14/03) (USEJ!IA, 2003) and the parameters shown on Table 3-7. (d) Soil vapor concentrations are arithmetic mean concentrations from the August 2004 sa molina event Within the exoosure area. October, 2004 J:llndi_Service\Project Files\Parker Hannifin\Wake Forest, NC Slte\Vapor Intrusion Work\Risk Tables_SVEval.xlsEPC Table 3·7 Parameters Used In the U.S. EPA Johnson and Ettinger Model (a) Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina 51te-5peCITICI Parameter Name Default Soil Vapor SamplinQ Depth NA Depth below grade to bottom of enclosed space floor (Slab or Basement NA Construction) scs Soil Type Site-specific Average Soil Temperature U.S. EPA Default Vadose zone soil dry bulk density U.S. EPA Default Vadose zone soli total porosity based on site-specific Vadose zone soil water filled porosity soil type Enclosed Space Floor Length/Width Site-specific Indoor air exchange rate Default (d) Notes: NA • Not applicable. (a) USEPA, 2003. On-site Building 45.48 em (b) 15cm (Slab-on-grade construction) Sand 10C(50F) 1.66 g/em3 0.375 0.054 (c) 0.828 h'1 (b) Sub-slab soil vapor samples were collected from 12 to 15 inches below the top of the concrete floor. Soil vapor sampling depth below grade is equal to the depth of 12 inches (30.48 em) from the floor plus the distance below the grade to floor of 15 em. (c) Heating room: 60 II x 18.75 II (1828.8 em x 571.5 em) Main plant: 358 fix 362.5 II (10911.84 cmx 11049 em) Offices: 13.75 II X 12.5 II (419.1 em X 381 em) Plating room: 119 II x 78 II (3627.12 em x 2377.44 em) Warehouse: 362.5 II x 78 II (11 049 em x 2377.44 em) (d) Default value for a commercial building used by the RBCA Tool Kit for Chemical Releases software, Version 1.3a, designed by Groundwater Services, Inc. (2000). October, 2004 J:~ndi_Service\Project Files\Parker Hannifin\Wake Forest, NC Site\ Vapor Intrusion Work\Risk Tables_SVEval.xlsJE Parameters Table3-8 Summary of Potential cancer Risk and Noncarcinogenic Hazard Index Parker Hannifin Wake Forest, North carolina Scenario 1 -Existing On-site Building-On-Site Worker Sub-Slab Soil Vapor to Indoor Air Heating Room Main Plant Offices Platin ~ Room Warehouse (east) Potential Noncancer Potential Noncancer Potential Noncancer Potential Noncaricer Potential Noncancer Cancer Hazard Cancer Hazard Cancer Hazard cancer Hazard cancer Hazard Risk Index Risk Index Risk Index Risk Index Risk Index Compound CAS Slab Slab Slab Slab Slab Slab Slab Slab Slab Slab Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 NCOPC NCO PC NCO PC NCOPC NCO PC NCOPC 7.75E-08 7.24E-03 NCO PC NCOPC Chloroform 67-66-3 NCO PC NCO PC 2.94E-08 7.17E-05 NCO PC NCOPC 3.81E-OB 9.26E-05 8.43E-07 2.05E-03 cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 NCO PC NCO PC NC 4.56E-04 NCOPC NCO PC NCO PC NCO PC NCO PC NCO PC Chloromethane 74-87-3 NCO PC NCO PC NCOPC NCO PC NCO PC NCO PC NC 2.02E-05 NCO PC NCOPC Cydohexane 11~2-7 NC 7.72E-07 NCOPC NCO PC NCO PC NCOPC NCO PC NCOPC NCO PC NCOPC Methylene chloride 75-09-2 9.35E-10 1.39E-05 NCO PC NCO PC NCOPC NCOPC NCO PC NCOPC NCO PC NCOPC Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 2.89E-OB 2.75E-05 3.96E-07 3.77E-04 NCOPC NCOPC 1.34E-08 1.28E-05 NCO PC NCO PC Tetrahydroturan 109-99-9 NCO PC NCO PC NCO PC NCO PC 8.40E-09 4.02E-05 NCOPC NCOPC NCO PC NCO PC Trichloroelhene (a) 79-01-6 1.24E-05 8.67E-03 1.45E-04 1.02E-01 4.54E-07 3.18E-04 3.02E-04 2.11E-01 1.02E-03 7.14E-01 Trichloroethane (b) 79-01-7 2.17E-07 8.67E-03 2.54E-06 1.02E-01 7.95E-09 3.18E-04 5.28E-06 2.11E-01 1.79E-05 7.14E-01 Total: (a) 1.24E-05 8.71E-03 1.46E-04 1.03E-01 4.62E-07 3.58E-04 3.02E-04 2.18E-01 1.02E-03 7.16E-01 (b) 2.47E-07 8.71E-03 2.97E-06 1.03E-01 1.63E-OB 3.58E-04 5.41E-06 2.18E-01 1.87E-05 7.16E-01 Notes: CAS -Chemical Abstract Service. NC-Not calculated; No dose-response value available. NCOPC -Not a compound of potential concern for this scenario. Bolded values indicate an exceedence of the target cancer risk ra~e of 1x10 ... to 1x10_. or target hazard index of 1. (a) Usi~ the provisional cancer slope factor of 0.4 mg/kg-day from Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment synthesis and characterization. EPA/600/p-01/002A. August 2001. Personal communication (USEPA. July 9, 2003). (b) Using the cancer slope factor of 0.007 mglkg-day from california Cancer Potency Values. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment June 2, 2004. - Warehouse (west) Potential Noncancer Cancer Hazard Risk Index Slab Slab NCO PC NCO PC 2.71E-08 6.59E-05 NCO PC NCO PC NCO PC NCOPC NCO PC NCOPC NCO PC NCOPC 3.20E-08 3.04E-05 1.76E-09 8.42E-08 1.07E-07 7.50E-05 1.87E-09 7.50E-05 1.68E-07 1.80E-04 6.27E-08 1.BOE-04 October, 2004 J:Undi_Service\Project Files\Parker Hannifin\Wake Forest. NC Site\Vapor Intrusion Work\Risk Tables_SVEval.xlsTotals e e e e e Tabla 3-9 Sensitivity Analysis for Trichloroethane • Parameters Varied in the USEPA Johnson and Ettinger Model (a) Parker Hannlfln Facility Wake Forest, North Carolina Slta..Spaclflcl Alternate Scenario A Alternate Scenario B Alternate Scenario C Parameter Name Default Original Evaluation (Air Exchange Rata) (Room Size) (Soil Type) Soil Vapor Sampling Depth NA 45.48 em (b) .. -- Depth below grade to bottom of 15em enclosed space floor (Slab or Basement NA Construction) (Slab-on-grade constructlon) ---- SCSSoiiTypa Site-specific Sand --Clay Average Soil Temperature USEPA DetauH 10C(50F) --- Vadose zone soil dry bulk density USEPA DefauH based 1.66g/em3 --1.43 gJcm3 Vadose zone soil total porosity on site-specific soil 0.375 .. -0.459 Vadose zone soil water filled porosity type 0.054 --0.215 358 x 362.5 II 13.75 X 12.5 II Enclosed Space Floor Length/Width Site-specific (10911.84 x 11049 em) (d) --(419.1 x 381 em) (e) - Indoor air exchange rate Default 0.828 h-1 (c) 4 h"1 (f) --- Notes: "-"-Parameter unchanged. Equal to parameter used in the original evaluation. NA-Not applicable. (a) USEPA, 2003. (b) Sub-slab soil vapor samples were collected from 12 to 15 inches below the top of the concrete floor. Soil vapor sampling depth below grade is equal to the depth of 12 inches (30.48 em) from the floor plus the distance below the grade to floor of 15 em. (c) Default value for a commercial building used by the RBCA Tool Kit for Chemical Releases software, Version 1.3a, designed by Groundwater Services, Inc. (2000). (d) Building dimensions of main plant area. (e) Building dimensions of the office area. Represents the assumption that the main plant is divided up into smaller areas similar to the size of the office. (f) Minimum air exchanQe rate in an industrial settinQ reQuired bv the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). EPA-452/F-03-033. e October, 2004 J:\lndi_Service\Project Files\Park.er Hannifin\Wake Forest, NC Site\Vapor Intrusion Work\Scenario 1_existing on-site\Sensitivity Analysis\SensitivityAnaiSummary.xlsJE Parameters Table 3-10 Sensitivity Analysis for Trichloroethane Parker Hannlfln Wake Forest, North Carolina Predicted indoor air concentration (uglm3) (a) Total potential carcinogenic risk (b) Total potential carcinogenic risk (c) Total noncarcinogenic hazard quotient Notes: TCE-Trichloroethane. Original Evaluation 8.12E+OO 1.45E-04 2.54E-06 1.02E-01 Alternate Alternate Alternate Scenario A Scenario B ScenarioC (Air Exchange Rate) (Room Size) (Soli Type) 1.68E+OO 1.50E+02 1.55E-01 3.01E-05 2.69E-03 2.78E-06 5.26E-07 4.71E-05 4.86E-08 2.11 E-02 1.88E+OO 1.94E-03 Bolded values indicate an exceedence of the target cancer risk range of 1 x1 0-4 to 1 x1 0-6 or hazard quotient of 1. (a) Predicted TCE indoor air concentration in the main plant area (See Table 3-6) using the U.S. EPA Version of the Johnson and Sttinger (JE) Model, SG-ADV (3/14/03) (USEPA, 2003). See Table 3-9 for parameters input into the JE model for the original evaluation andeach alternative scenario. (b) Using the provisional cancer slope factor of 0.4 mglkg-<lay from Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment synthesis and characterization. EPA/600/p-01/002A. August 2001. Personal communication (USEPA, July 9, 2003). (c) Using the cancer slope factor of 0.007 mg/kg-<lay from California EPA Cancer Potency Values. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. June 2, 2004. October, 2004 J:\Scenario 1_existing on-site\Sensitivity Analysls\SensitlvityAnaiSummary.xlsiSensitivltyAnal FIGURES Source: USGS igure 1·1 Site Location Map Parker Hannifin Facility ke Forest, North Carolina North l ~ I ~ E I ~ I ;~ I $ I l\ 100,00/l GAL WAlEFITANK I I e OFFICES ® <D RAW MATERIAL WAREHOUSE ,-;:::::;:-:;::: I SOURCE: L"':"_'_O SCALE Floor Plan by NUS e MAIN PLANT <D MAIN PLANT @=Plant <D ® ® <D OFFICES /~ -WO?~ • e LEGEND Approximate Area of Aoor Covered with Acid Resis1ant Bri::k Aoor Trenches Leading to SWMU 15 (Approximate Location) Floor Drains Leading to SWMU 15 (Approximate Location) -------. ·---------, ' g~--: 0 Filler Beds : Fttter Press Room : EE ' Wast·-·~ ---, +--;--T~lment Ao~ - - - - - -;;..;; c;;..,., @ I ' -----Paoonglot I --------~ @I --I I I Fonner Drum s""'ge -<---"-··-·- 0 --------------------------~ EARTH@TECH SWMU and AOC Locations Parker Hannifin Facility Wake Forest, North CSrotina March 2002 Ftgure3 ... .... 12. tJ Ia 7 G 5 4 3 2 , .... /0 _,.... .. +-_1---436 ft. fi 160ft. I ~ I N/··· ~ r ., .. ., ' f-¢ A • SV-15 SV·1· • SV-2 I Y t -IUUo -j ':> I S'TRTPP#N.GB 8111 t-1 H t-1 H H 1-t .. H ;TOtNEt:/. 0----------esv-14 Main Plant :~ r-7 I W~rAhnll~ H H r-t ,... 1-1 ('b 11 _, C '' --"'f I 'T IN· I I H H c.O. t< H 1-1 H H f.-Pfi>E-o3 I i • SV-8 SV-3 _ a\'-- 1-t I H H tf H H ,..,. Plating R H ;: '"' H -H_ 2 rN H H H --.........._ t< -q:l!!fi·''ti _U _ J F It) H ~1 H H <i,,;·t+,~ i H H ,;.,.tt f.ii'l~.J:UI I G L ~ co. H t-1 .... ... H +II,.. ~-... I~ I ~I H I> ,,. H .. r1 .... H .... H H •-.I '-'J-I I J ~Ill 78 ft. I ~. I H 6 ~-· '"' H H ,... · H H H t1 ; --.J.$":::1 K 'I-• ~· Sv 10 Mam Plant ,o. _ o 1 ~I \ r ,_. H o-t H .-,.. 1-j H ..., t< t . I ,.. 11 L Sv 12 c.o. ' I I • SV-11 o o I • <I • •·•·I ,.o I : ~Ware'liouse ... ... H .... ,"" "" "" H ~-< ' .---''· M I (E t E d) 12 5 ft , " -I 1 I asn "l~ "'-" ~ ... "'N~ 1 N ~ I ~ :'~ / I l_j ~A··--~ J ·~ Mel' I woMEN 1 __...,.., Offices zl ;;. 1 _, 13.75 ft. e e - SOIL VAPOR PROBE CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM Approximately 4-feet of 0.17-inch Inside Diameter (ID) Teflon tubing Soil Vapor Probes Installed by ENSR of the following dates: SV-1 through SV-6 Installed: July 30, 2004 SV-7 through SV-15 Installed: September 9, 2004 EN:RTM ENSR CONSUL liNG AND ENGINEERING FIGURE 2-2 Soil Vapor Probe Construction Diagram Parker Hannifin Corporation Wake Forest, North Carolina