The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutIDX SOIL SAMPLES-OCR*301HSSF2021 * 11111111111111111111111111 DocumentlD NONCD0001814 Site Name HAMILTON BEACH/PROCTOR SILEX DocumentType Site Assessment Rpt (SAR) RptSegment 4 Doc Date DocRcvd Box Access level Division Section Program DocCat 1/1/1999 2/20/2007 SF2021 PUBLIC WASTE MANAGEMENT SUPERFUND IHS (IHS) FACILITY SOIL SAMPLES • • 10/02/98 16:28:02 Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C Test Code 827SSBCM Project Sample ID: ' Lab ID: File ID: Pate Collected: Pate Prepared: Date Analyzed: Pilution Factor: Matrix: Units: Report as: Column: Analyte Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Acetophenone 2-Acetylaminofluorene 4-Aminobiphenyl Aniline Anthracene Benz(a)anthracene Benz(a)pyrene Benzidine Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzoic acid Benzyl alcohol 4-Bromophenylphenyl ether Butylbenzylphthalate Carbazole 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol p-Chloroaniline • RBSULTS SUMMARY 09981lBWP02A 0998HBWP02B 9809512-03A 9809512-04A W8423 Y9384 09/22/98 09/22/98 09/28/98 ll:U5:00 09/28/98 11:05:00 09/30/98 00:45 09/29/98 18:24 1 1 Solid Solid ug/g ug/g dry weight dry weight Cone. DL Cone. DL ND 0. 0241 ND 0.0157 ND 0. 0178 ND 0. 0143 ND 0.00925 ND 0.0129 ND 0.0201 ND" 0. 0136 ND 0. 0433 lA.:J' ND 0.0903 t,W ND 0. 0272 ND 0.0174 ND 0.0197 ND 0.0160 ND 0.0210 ND 0.0197 ND 0.0324 ND 0. 0144 f-N" 1. I"!t ~ NEl 8.585 ND 0.0273 ND 0.0121 ND 0.0264 ND 0.0103 ND 0.0140 ND 0.0253 ND 0 .121\A.~ ND 1.60\.W ND 0. 0414 ND 0.0304 ND 0.0394 ND 0.0301 ND 0. 0115 ND 0.00894 ND 0.00683 ND 0.0107 ND 0.0326 ND 0.0247 ND 0.0101 ND 0. 0140 ~b Niu\-&-\c <.-\ c ,\ v... ~o \ p<c~~~~-a:.\:. ..... ,~ ~ {,l ,~Ut-l.W \e,.,re.-' ~ \?lll--0:-l.c~~A~·D": v.:s ~ct ck\u:.\-<4\ ~ -ttu. UL.-•'S Q.,~~+L.(.~, R LV\.vL'Stt-'°l.L ck.,~' 0998HBWP04A 9809512-02A W8422 09/22/98 09/28/98 11:05:00 09/30/98 00:04 1 Solid ug/g dry weight Cone. DL ND 0.0251 ND 0.0185 ND 0.00964 ND 0.0210 Work Order # 9809512 Page 2.._ 0998HBWP04B 9809512-0lA W8421 09/22/98 09/28/98 11:05:00 09/29/98 23:24 l Solid ug/g dry weight Cone. DL • ND 0.0274 ND 0.0202 ND 0. 0105 ND 0.0229 ND 0.04S21JJ ND 0. 04 92 \,\-:) ND 0.0283 ND 0.0309 ND 0.0205 ND 0.0224 ND 0.0219 ND 0.0238 ND 0.0337 ND 0.0368 j2_ NP I.22" l2... N9 I."3-rl ND 0.0285 ND 0.0311 ND 0.0275 ND 0.0300 ND 0.0146 ND 0.0159 ND 0.12611-3 ND 0. 137 1.1.3 ND 0. 04 31 ND 0.0470 ND 0. 0411 ND 0.0448 ND 0.0120 ND 0.0131 ND 0.00712 ND 0. 00776 ND 0. 0339 ND 0.0370 ND 0.0105 ND 0. 0114 GROUNDWATER SAMPLES • • • Radian International collected twenty-four groundwater samples on November 16-18, 1998 at the Hamilton Beach-Protor Silex facility in Washington, NC. All of the samples and two equipment blanks were submitted to Radian's analytical laboratory in Austin, Texas for the analysis of volatile and semivolatile organic compounds (VOC/SVOC) by SW-846 Methods 8260B and 8270C, respectively. Eighteen of these samples were submitted to the laboratory for the determination of alkalinity (EPA 310.1), sulfates (EPA 300.0), and nitrate-nitrites (EPA 353.1). The laboratory was also requested to analyze eight samples for total dissolved solids (TDS) by EPA Method 160.1. A trip blank was included in each shipment of samples submitted to Radian's laboratory for the analysis of VOC. Radian reviewed the analytical results, which were reported by the laboratory under work order numbers 9811465-469, 497, 550-570, and 619. The data evaluation was modeled after the National Functional Guidelines for Organic and Inorganic Data Review (EPA, February 1994). Accuracy was determined from the review of holding times, spike recoveries, initial and continuing calibration, and blank contamination. Precision was based on the evaluation of laboratory duplicate results. The results of the data evaluation are summarized below. All samples were received intact and in good condition by the laboratory on November 17-19, 1998. The temperature of the samples upon receipt was within laboratory·specification limits of 2-6°C. The laboratory observed air bubbles in one of three volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials received for sample 1198HBWW22 l. Air bubbles were also found in trip blank VOA vials received by the laboratory on November 17 and 18, 1998. The VOA results of trip blank #1, which was received by the laboratory on November 18, were qualified as estimated (J/UJ) because of headspace in the vial. Qualification was not required of the other VOA results because spare sample vials, which did not contain air bubbles greater than 6 millimeters in size, were available for analysis. Holding times were met during all analyses, except the VOA of a trip blank that was received by the laboratory on November 18, and the TDS analysis of samples 1198HBWW210-21 l, and 222- 224. The results of the laboratory control sample (LCS) analyses were reviewed for accuracy and precision. Laboratory and project specifications were met during the nitrate-nitrite, sulfate, and alkalinity LCS analyses. However, specifications were not met during the following LCS analyses: LCSID I Analvte I Result r QC.Limits Volatile OrJ?anics LCS985545 and 2-Butanone (MEK) 54,56%R 60-140%R1 LCSD985546 2-Hexanone 52, 54%R 4-Methvl-2-oentanone (MIBK) 57, 57%R LCS985987 and Carbon Tetrachloride 153, 150%R 60-140%R1 LCS985988 46-150%R2 Trichlorofluoromethane 145, 143%R . 60-140%R1 LCS985989 and Bromodichloromethane 143, 142%R 60-140%R1 LCS985990 57-135%R2 Bromoform 151, 153%R 60-140%R1 23-151%R2 1 Project specification limits of 60-140%R were exceeded in both the LCS and its duplicate. 2 Laboratory specification limits. 1198HB CSA Data Review.doc Page 1of5 01/19/99 I .Action J+/R- J+ J+ LCSID Analyte Carbon Tetrachloride Trichlorofluoromethane LCS98601 l and MEK LCSD986012 2-Hexanone LCS986013 and MEK LCSD986014 2,2-Dichloroprqpane 2-Hexanone MIBK Vinyl Acetate LCS986017 and 2,2-Dichloropropane LCSD986018 Semivolatile Orf?anics LCS/LCSD-986226 Aniline Benzidine 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol Hexachlorocyciooentadiene LCS/LCSD-986251 Aniline Benzidine p-Chloroaniline 3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine Hexachlorocvclopentadiene Pentachlorophenol LCS/LCSD-986266 Aniline Benzidine Benzoic Acid LCS/LCSD-986322 Benzidine Benzoic Acid Hexachlorocvclooentadiene Total Dissolved Solids LCS/LCSD-986323 I TDS J+ LCS LCSD MEK MIBK NA QC R- %R %RPD TDS Estimate positive values Laboratory control sample Laboratory control sample duplicate 2-Butanone or methyl ethyl ketone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone Not available Quality control Reject non-detects Percent recovery %Relative percent difference Total dissolved solids I Result QC Limits Action 160, 158%R 60-140%R1 46-150%R2 151, 151%R 60-140%R1 39-147%R2 57, 56%R 60-140%R1 J+/R- 59, 55%R ·. 52, 56%R 60-140%R1 J+/R- 49,48%R 52, 53%R 57, 57%R 59, 54%R 46,46%R 60-140%R1 J+/R- 57, 55%R 60-140%R1 J+/R- 1.6, 0%R J+/R- 146, 142%R J+ 45.4, 31%R J+/R- 2.2%Rand 45-85%R, NoneJ 187%RPD <29%RPD2 0,0%R 60-140%R' J+/R- 31%Rand 60-106%R, NoneJ 94%RPD <29%RPD2 65%Rand 67-135%R, Nonej 44%RPD <35%RPD2 19, 14%R 60-140%R1 J+/R- 145, 134%R 66-132%Rt NoneJ NA4,63%R 60-140%R1 J+/R- NA,3.8%R NA,59%R 8.1, 12%R 60-140%R1 J+/R- 36, 35%R 36, 43%R 130, 126 %R I 84-114%R;t IJ+ Associated sample results have been qualified as indicated above because of poor LCS results. 3 Only one of the two LCS recoveries failed to meet laboratory specifications and project specifications of 60-140%R in both the LCS and LCSD were met. 4 Laboratory specifications were not met during the LCS analysis due to a spiking error; recoveries were less than 60%R according to the Quality Control Exception Report. The LCS results were not reported by the laboratory. l 198HB CSA Data Review.doc Page 2 of 5 01/19/99 • • • • • • Surrogate recoveries did not meet laboratory specifications during organic analyses. The recovery for at least one of three surrogate compounds was l.ess than the laboratory specification limits during the VOA of samples 1198HBWW216, 217, 221, 225, 227, 228, and 231. The samples were reanalyzed to verify matrix interference. Acceptabie surrogate recoveries were obtained for all samples, except 1198HBWW216, 217, 221, and 231, upon reanalysis. Except for the November 19 at 15:05 analysis of sample 1198HBWW225, sample results from analyses with unacceptable surrogate recoveries were qualified as estimated (J/UJ). The results from the original VOA of sample 1198HBWW225 have been qualified as unusable (R) because the results obtained upon reanalysis are more accurate. Surrogate recoveries met labor;:ltory specifications during all SVOA except for sample l 198HBWW228. Since only one out of three acid surrogate compounds failed to meet laboratory specifications during the SVOA of sample 1198HBWW228, no action is warranted. Acceptable sample results were obtained for the internal standards during all organic analyses. Samples 1198HBWW212 and 213 were selected for the volatile organic, semivolatile organic, nitrite-nitrate, and sulfate matrix spike (MS) analyses. Sample 1198HBWW208 was also subjected to an MS VOA. An alkalinity and sulfate MS analysis was conducted on sample 1198HBWW224. Laboratory QC criteria were not met during the following project-specific sample MS/MSD analyses: Sample ID Analysis 1198HBWW213 voe svoc Alkalinity 1198HBWW212 svoc J+ Estimate positive value Quality control Percent recovery Analyte 1, 1-Dichloroethene Trichloroethene Pentachlorophenol Phenol 2-Chlorophenol n-Nitroso-di-n- oroovlamine Pentachlorophenol Phenol QC %R %RPD svoc voe Percent relative percent difference Semivolatile organic compound Volatile organic compound Results QC Limits. Action -124,-23%R 47-175%R, None5 137%RPD <25%RPD 27, 36%R 71-129%R, 29%RPD <17%RPD 138, 137%R 66-132%R None0 122%R 76-118%R None7 93, 93%R 95-109%R J+ 121%R 82-118%R None7 131%R 75-127%R 142%R 66-132%R 136%R 76-118%R Laboratory specifications were met during the alkalinity, nitrate-nitrite, sulfate, and volatile and semivolatile organic initial and continuing calibrations. Project specifications were not met for several target analytes during some of the volatile and semivolatile organic initial and continuing calibrations. During the SepteJTiber 21 and October 3 volatile organic initial calibration on instruments MSDC and MSDB, respectively, the average response factor (RF) was less than 0.05 for acrolein. The response factor was also less than 0.05 for acetonitrile during the September 21 5 Native sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by a factor of four or more. 6 Analyte not detected in parent sample. . 7 Only one of the two MS recoveries failed to meet laboratory specifications. l l 98HB CSA Data Review.doc Page 3 of 5 01/19/99 initial calibration on instrument MSDC. Positive and non-detect acrolein and acetonitrile results in the associated samples have been qualified as estimated and unusable (R), respectively. The percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) between RFs exceeded 30 during the following initial calibrations: 2-butanone and tetrahydrofuran (October 3 VOA), bromoform and 1,2-dibromo-3- chloropropane (September 21 VOA). Associated sample results for the above-mentioned compounds were qualified as estimated (J/UJ) due to poor precision. Project specifications were not met for some analytes during the volatile and semivolatile organic continuing calibrations. Positive results in the associated samples were qualified as estimated (J) whenever the recovery for a continuing calibration standard exceeded project specification limits of 80-120%. Whenever the recovery was less than 80% during a continuing calibration, non-detect results for associated samples were qualified as estimated (UJ). Methylene chloride, a common laboratory contaminant, was detected during the VOA of the method, trip, and equipment blanks. Acetophenone, carbon disulfide, cis-1, 2-dichloroethene, and trichloroethene were also detected in the blanks during the organic analyses. Nitrate-nitrite, bicarbonate, and total dissolved solids were also detected in method blanks. Sample results not significantly greater (ten times for common contaminants, five times for all others) than the maximum amount detected among the blanks have been qualified as non-detect (ND). The sample detection limit has been elevated to the amount of contamination present in the sample and flagged with an "U." A common semivolatile organic blank contaminant, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, was detected in seven of the samples (1198HBWW210, 213, 214, 219, 225, 229, and 230) at concentrations · ranging from 0.91to2.63 parts per billion (ppb). Benzoic acid and phenol were also detected in some of the samples at trace levels. These semivolatile organic compounds have been known to be present in laboratory blanks. Benzoic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, and phenol were detected in the laboratory's method blanks at concentrations as high as 15.73, 386, and 2.18 ppb, respectively, between September and December 1998. Although these analytes were not detected in any of the blanks reported by the laboratory, the presence of these analytes at trace levels in the samples should be consider suspect. The laboratory reported the potential for instrument carryover during the VOA of samples 1198HBWW210,_211, 214, 215, 222, 223, 230, and 231. Results that were not confirmed upon reanalysis were flagged non-detect (ND), and the detection limit elevated to the amount present in the sample and flagged with an "U." Precision was deemed acceptable during the laboratory duplicate analysis of samples 1198HBWW211 and 225 for TDS. Acetone was detected at a concentration outside the calibration range (and linear range of the instrument) during the VOA of sample 1198HBWW228. The sample was reanalyzed at a higher dilution but acetone was diluted out. Due to high concentrations of other target analytes, the sample could be not reanalyzed at an intermediate dilution. Acetone was qualified as estimated (J) in sample 1198HBWW28. During the SVOA of sample 1198HBWW228 and 230, 3-methylphenol co-eluted with 4- methylphenol. The result for 4-methylphenol was qualified as estimated (J) in these two samples since it may be the sum of the two indistinguishable isomers. The laboratory reanalyzed samples 1198HBWW210, 211, 222, 223, and 224 for TDS because of the potential for the wash bottle, which was used for rinsing, to be contaminated. Evidence of l 198HB CSA Data Review.doc Page 4 of 5 01/19/99 • • • • • • contamination was observed during the TDS analysis of blank BLK984129 and LCS/LCSD- 986323. The level (208 parts per million) of TDS reported in the method blank was significantly greater than the specification limit of 15 parts per million. LCS/LCSD recoveries were above the tolerance limit. Sample results associated with this analytical bateh were qualified as unusable (R). Multiple analyses were performed because of poor surrogate recovery, elevated levels of contaminants, and the potential for cross-contamination. The justification for qualifying extraneous data as unusable (R) was as follows: · • The potential exists for results to be biased high or low whenever the surrogate recovery exceeds the upper or lower control limit, respectively; sample results associated with the reanalysis are more accurate whenever acceptable recoveries are obtained. • When sample concentrations exceed the calibration range, the results from the reanalysis that are within the calibration range are considered more accurate (unless diluted out). • Data that has been R-flagged by the laboratory are considered unusable (R) when the potential for cross-contamination exists. Alkalinity and sulfate results reported below sample detection limits have been qualified as non- detect (ND) . 1198HB CSA Data Review.doc Page 5 of 5 01/19/99 -0.. 3 .;-'O -rr 5 .., r. .; v • =-;;; ;J :r ... ..., -" ~ C'" " r. "' :I :: .0 c -c ~ VJ -· m " .,, c. >-·~ -11 ;;>J " ... C'" 0. 2 g· ~ :r :0 .. .c 3 = ~ a· :I a C'" '-' "' " 0. 5 j-r. ~ =-;;; 0 -. 5-" 0. '-' ;:; fa < ii' ~ 'O a n n "' !" ~ :r ;:;· :r ;;;· 3 0 c. " n-0. ... ::;> n ., ::;. .. ~ I ~ s " ::::. g !:._ C) ~ ::-: ~ ,., ~-::; c .... § ~ • ll/30/98 16:33:05 Method Volatile Organics SW82608 Test Code 826SWACM Project Sample ID: Lab ID: File ID: Date Collected: Date Prepared: Date Analyzed: Dilution Factor: Matrix: Units: Report as: Column: Analyte Surrogate(s) l,4-0romofluorobenzene l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 Toluene-dB 1198HBWW216 9811467-03A 81118820 11/16/98 14: 30 00:00:00 11/19/98 00:59:00 l Water ug/L received Cone. Recovery \ 93 94 86 Q DL • R K S 0 L T S S 0 M M A R Y (Cont'd) 1198HBWW216 9811467-030 01119807 11/16/98 14:30 00:00:00 11/19/98 15:33:00 l Water ug/L received Cone. Recovery ' 94 94 84 Q DL ll98H0WW217 9811467-04A 01118821 11/16/98 14: 40 00:00:00 11/19/98 01:28:00 l Water ug/L received Cone. DL Recovery \ 94 92 78 Q Work Order U 9811467 Page lL 1198H0WW217 9811467-040 01119808 11/16/98 14:40 00:00:00 11/19/98 16:01:00 l Water ug/L received Cone. DL Recovery \ 92 94 78 Q • 'i " ., § D' =-i:; v; ~ :r "' ::: < " :>o t:r ~ " " ~ ~ ..c c: -c ~ tn =< m" -0 c:.. I' ·'r "l1 ;o r. "' er c.. 2 ~-.~ 5"' -;:; "2 3 ;; E Ci" ~ E.. t:r "' "' " c. c ~ :7-,. rt "' g. ~. 2. :7-" c.. "' p Cil < (i" ~ 'O a n ll "' !" ~ :r ;:;· :r u;· 3 0 c.. " " c. "' :::> ll ., :;. "' ~ §· §_ ~ ::s " :::. c::i "' ::.. 0 ~ ~· "' .._ ~· <::> _., .r; ~ .., 12/02~:45:31 Method Volatile Organics SW82608 Test Code 826SWACM Project Sample ID: Lab ID: File ID: Date Collected: Date Prepared: Date Analyzed: Dilution Factor: Matrix: Units: Report as: Column: Analyte Surrogate(s) 1,4-8romofluorobenzene l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 Toluene-de 1198H8WW211 9811555-048 81121812 11/17 /98 14 :45 00:00:00 11/21/98 08:38:00 50 Water ug/L received Cone. Recovery ' 97 92 98 DL RBS 0 LT S • MARY· (Cont'd) 1198H8WW222 9811555-lOA 81120819 11/17 /98 10 :45 00:00:00 11/20/98 09:50:00 1 Water ug/L received Cone. DL Recovery ' 95 95 93 1198H8WW223 9811555-09A 81120818 11/17/98 10:50 00:00:00 11/20/98 09:22:00 1 Water ug/L received Cone. Recovery ' 94 96 90 DL Work Order # 9811555 Page £!_ 1198HBWW229 • 9811555-0GA 81120815 11/17/98. 08 :25 00:0.0:00 11/20/98 07:57:00 l Water ug/L received Cone. Recovery ' 94 101 97 DL '"' ~ " ~ § V> =-;:; c;; ~ ::r "' -: .. ?." a-.. r. ;;: ::i .0 c r.: ~ '../] =o rn .. -0 c. ?"·~ "Tl ;;o r. "' 'T 0.. ~ if ~ s -0 " .c; 3 .t ~ 5· ::i !:.. -r t:: f-t :5 :;. r. ~ V> ~ ·•. :;. .. c. "' ~ -· r. < c;· :e -0 g n .,, !" :! ;:;· ::r u;· 3 ':> c. r.. [ " ;::> ... .. S-"' f a ~ ::i !:: :::; ::i !:.. ~ :· ·.; "" ::; C) ~ :::: :: " 12/02~:19:03 Method Volatile Organics SW82608 Test Code 826SWACM Project Sample ID: Lab ID: File ID: Date Collected: Date Prepared: Date Analyzed: Dilution Factor: Matrix: Units: Report as: Column: Analyte Surrogate(s) 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene l,2-D~chloroethane-d4 Toluene-dB ll98H8WE02 9811619-118 Cll23822 11/18/98 13:30 00:00:00 11/24/98 02:12:00 1 Water ug/L received Cone. Recovery ' 96 106 101 DL RR SULT S • II ARY (Cont'd) 1198H8WW212 9811619-0lA 81121816 11/18/98 09:00 00:00:00 11/21/98 10:34:00 1 Water ug/L received Cone. Recovery ' 95 92 87 DL 1198H8WW213 9811619-04A 81121819 11/18/98 09:30 00:00:00 11/21/98 11:59:00 l Water ug/L received Cone. DL Recovery ' 96 96 95 Work Order H 9811619 ~ Page lL 1198H8WW213 9811619-048 Cll23824 11/18/98 09:30 00:00:00 11/24/98 03:08:00 20 Water ug/L received Cone. DL Recovery \ 96 104 102 .'i " .r; fl ~ V> g. V> ? :::r .... -: n. ~ ':T n. r. " "' :: .0 c: -r: ~ Vl :=; rr1 n. -0 c.. ?--·~ ;p ;;iJ .... ..,.. 0. ~ ~f -~ s :;; " -0 3 ;; g 5· "' g_ c:r fi n. c.. c "' :;. r. ii! ~ "· r. c. t.. i.: 0 < ... ~ -0 a n n Ill !" "' :::r ;;· ::r :;.· 3 0 c.. n. er c. .... ::::-· "' ., :;. t\ ~ 5· ~ ~ ;:, ..., :::. <::> " ~ ~ ~ ~ .. .., ?· ., 0 _., ~ ~ '1 12/02~:19:03 Method Volatile Organics SW8260B Test Code 826SWACM Project Sample ID: Lab ID: File ID: Date Collected: Date Prepared: Date Analyzed: Dilution Factor: Matrix: Units: Report as: Column: Analyte Surrogate(s) l,4-8romofluorobenzene l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 Toluene-de ll98HBWW227 98ll619-09A 81121824 11/18/98 13:00 00:00:00 ll/21/98 14:21:00 l Water ug/L received Cone. Recovery ' 98 42 Q 100 DL R B S 0 L T S • M A. R Y (Cool: 'di 1198HBWW227 1198HBWW228 9811619-098 9811619-lOA Cll23825 81121825 11/18/98 13:00 11/18/98 13:20 00:00:00 00:00:00 11/24/98 03:37:00 11/21/98 14 :49:00 100 l Water Water ug/L ug/L received received Cone. DL Cone. DL Recovery Recovery ' ' 96 106 104 6.7 Q 102 139 Q Work Order # 9811619 Page n._ 1198H8WW228 9811619-108 Cll23826 • 11/18/98 13:20 00:00:00 11/24/98 04: 04; 00 500 Water ug/L received Cone. DL Recovery ' 97 102 103 i. a ~'9. ,. .. -. rt "' =-. ;;; 0 :r ~ "' ~~ ~ -n. ~ O" n. n. "' :::J :: .0 c -"' c :: VI =i n. me.. :u O" >-·< ;:p ;;o:l "' O" Q. 2 ~r ~ s -" :g 3 .j... "' -=· 0 :::J e. O" "' "' n. Q. 0 :::J 5-n. ~ =-;;; 0 ..... 5-.. Q. "' 6 rt -: r;· ~ 'O a n .. "' l" ~ :r ;;· :r u;· 3 0 c.. n. ;r Q.. "' ;:::> n ., :;. ... ~ I ~ :. .... :::. "' :. ~ ~ ~ ::::· ii "' '-::--. ::; 0 ·"' § " 11/24/98 16:17:17 Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C Test Code 827SWBCM Project Sample ID: Lab ID: File ID: Date Collected: Date Prepared: Date Analyzed: Dilution Factor: Matrix: Units: Report as: Column: Analyte Surrogate(s} 2-Fluorobiphenyl :;;i-Fluorophenol Nitrobenzene-d5 Phenol-d5 Terphenyl-dl4 2,4,6-Tribromophenol • 1198HBWW224 9811465-0lA Z9203 11/16/98 11/18/98 11 :05 :00 11/23/98 12:10 1 Water ug/L received Cone. DL Recovery ' 105 102 104 106 100 123 RBSOLTS S 0 M M AR Y (Cont'd) 1198HBWW226 9811465-06A Z9210 11/16/98 11/18/98 11:05:00 11/23/98 16:26 1 Water ug/L received Cone. DL Recovery ' 104 100 105 106 100 120 • Cone. DL Recovery \ Work Order # 981146~ Page !!._ Cone. DL Recovery \ •