4112_GreensboroMSWLF_GWMR_DIN27849_20160926

White Street Landfill – Phase III
Permit #41-12
Detection Monitoring, September 2016
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
Prepared for:
The City of Greensboro
Prepared by:
S&ME, Inc.
8646 W Market St, Suite 105
Greensboro, NC 27409
January 11, 2017
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 11, 2017 ii
Table of Contents
1.0 Executive Summary...............................................................................................1
2.0 Introduction............................................................................................................2
3.0 Scope Of Work.......................................................................................................2
4.0 Methods Employed...............................................................................................2
4.1 Monitoring Well Sampling..............................................................................................2
4.2 Statistical Analysis of Data..............................................................................................3
4.2.1 Software...............................................................................................................................3
4.2.2 Statistical Methods-Groundwater Analyses.......................................................................4
4.3 Stream Sampling...............................................................................................................4
5.0 Results......................................................................................................................4
5.1 Groundwater Analytical Results....................................................................................4
5.2 Statistical Results..............................................................................................................5
5.2.1 Overview of Database..........................................................................................................5
5.2.2 Statistical Analyses.............................................................................................................6
5.2.2.1 Descriptive Statistics........................................................................................................6
5.2.2.2 Time vs. Concentration Graphs......................................................................................6
5.2.2.3 Interwell Statistical Comparisons...................................................................................6
5.2.2.4 Non-Parametric Prediction Interval Test......................................................................7
5.3 Hydraulic Conductivity...................................................................................................7
5.4 Groundwater Flow Direction and Rate.........................................................................7
5.5 Surface Water....................................................................................................................8
5.6 Leachate Sample Analytical Results ..............................................................................8
5.7 Quality Assurance............................................................................................................8
6.0 References...............................................................................................................9
7.0 Certification..........................................................................................................10
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 11, 2017 iii
Appendices
Tables
Figures
Appendix I – Field Sampling Data Sheets
Appendix II – Laboratory Analytical Report
Appendix III – Time vs Concentrations Graphs
Appendix IV – NCDEQ EDDS (CD only)
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 11, 2017 1
1.0 Executive Summary
Eleven groundwater monitoring wells and three stream locations at the lined Subtitle D White Street
Landfill were sampled between September 27 and September 28, 2016. Ten wells (MW-17, MW-18, MW-
19, MW-20, MW-21, MW-22, MW-23, MW-24, MW-25, and MW-25D) comprise the groundwater
monitoring system for the lined Subtitle D solid waste disposal area of the landfill, also known as Phase III.
Monitoring wells MW-15 and MW-16 serve as background wells for Phase III. The collected samples were
submitted to a North Carolina certified laboratory for analysis using the federal Appendix I list of volatile
organic and inorganic constituents for detection monitoring. Samples from surface water locations SW-1,
SW-2, SW-3, and SW-4 were analyzed for federal Appendix I detection monitoring constituents. The
following summarizes the findings for this event.
♦Groundwater sample analyses detected no Appendix I volatile organic compounds at the sampled
locations, except for an estimated concentration of 2-Butanone at background well MW-15.
♦Groundwater sample analyses report no Appendix I inorganics at concentrations which exceed
the corresponding NCAC 2L groundwater quality standards. Cobalt and vanadium were detected
in groundwater samples. Since there are no established NCAC 2L standards for these metals, the
results were compared with the North Carolina, Interim Maximum Allowable Concentrations
(IMAC). The cobalt concentration at well MW-24 was greater than the corresponding IMAC. The
vanadium concentrations reported at wells MW-17, MW-19, MW-20, MW-23, and MW-25b were
greater than the corresponding IMAC. Time vs concentration plots for cobalt and vanadium were
examined and do not suggest trends of increasing concentrations over time, most suggest
generally stable concentrations over time. These findings provide a line of reasoning that
supports the natural occurrence of these metals at the Facility. The Phase III Alternate Source
Demonstration (ASD) for metals also supports this finding.
♦The groundwater analytical results were examined for evidence of statistically significant increases
(SSIs) over background values. The statistical tests suggest that no SSIs occurred during this
groundwater monitoring event. This finding was further supported by a review of time vs
concentration graphs prepared for the detected constituents, which revealed no evidence of
increasing concentrations over time. Based on a finding of no SSIs, the reported concentrations
were not considered indicative of a release from the monitored unit.
♦Three Appendix I volatile organic compounds and seven inorganic constituents were detected in
one or more of the surface water samples collected. No 2B Standards associated with the Water
Supply (WS) stream classification were exceeded, except for copper which was detected up-
stream and down-stream at relative similar concentrations, thus we infer it is not from the Facility.
An ASD for metals was previously completed for the adjoining Phase II portion of the Facility. The results
of the ASD advocate that cobalt and vanadium concentrations reported above the respective IMAC values
were not likely due to a release by the Facility, but instead may be attributed to the natural occurrence of
these metals in the native, residual soil at concentrations sufficient to influence the concentrations in
groundwater. Although undertaken for Phase II of the Facility, the ASD results were likely applicable to
Phase III. During 2016, an ASD was developed for metals detected in shallow groundwater in the vicinity
of Phase III. The Phase III ASD also found cobalt and vanadium as naturally occurring in shallow
groundwater. The Phase III ADS was submitted to the NCDEQ-SWS for their review and approval.
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 11, 2017 2
2.0 Introduction
White Street Landfill is a Solid Waste Management Facility (SWMF) located at the north end of White
Street in northeastern Greensboro. The City of Greensboro operates this lined Subtitle D landfill, referred
to as Phase III, under Solid Waste Permit #41-12. Ten wells (MW-17, MW-18, MW-19, MW-20, MW-21,
MW-22, MW-23, MW-24, MW-25, and MW-25D) comprise the groundwater monitoring system for the
lined Subtitle D solid waste disposal area of the landfill. Monitoring wells MW-15 and MW-16 serve as
background wells for Phase III. The monitoring well locations are shown on Figure 1
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) was contracted by the City of Greensboro to conduct this semi-annual water quality
monitoring event. Groundwater samples were collected from two up-gradient and nine down-gradient
monitoring wells located along the perimeter of the Phase III disposal area. Surface water samples were
collected at surface water location SW-1, SW-2, SW-3 and SW-4. Sampling was conducted in accordance
with the approved site Water Quality Monitoring Plan.
The Phase III monitoring well samples were analyzed for the RCRA Subtitle D Appendix I parameters. The
surface water samples were also analyzed for the Appendix I list of constituents. This report discusses the
field procedures, summarizes the field measurements and analytical results, and presents the statistical
evaluation results for the September 2016 water quality monitoring event.
3.0 Scope Of Work
S&ME completed the following tasks as part of this monitoring event:
♦Sampled eleven monitoring wells and four surface water locations.
♦Obtained field values for pH, temperature, conductivity, dissolved oxygen (DO), oxidation-
reduction potential (ORP), and turbidity at each groundwater sample location.
♦Collected depth to water measurements prior to sampling and during well purging to monitor
drawdown.
♦Samples were analyzed for Appendix I constituents by a North Carolina certified laboratory using
State approved methods.
♦Assessed groundwater flow rates and directions at the Phase III area monitoring well locations.
♦Collected a sample of landfill leachate from the wet well for laboratory analyses.
♦Prepared and submitted reports to the City of Greensboro and the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, Division of Waste Management, Solid Waste Section (NCDEQ-SWS).
4.0 Methods Employed
4.1 Monitoring Well Sampling
On September 27 and 28, 2016, monitoring wells MW-15, MW-16, MW-17, MW-18, MW-19, MW-20,
MW-21, MW-22, MW-23, MW-24, and MW-25b were sampled. The water level observed in monitoring
well MW-25 was near the pump; therefore, it was not sampled. Prior to sampling, each well was opened
and the static water level was measured from the top edge of the PVC casing. Since dedicated
MicroPurge pumps were previously installed in each groundwater monitoring well as described in the
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 11, 2017 3
monitoring well construction details reported in the “Baseline Groundwater Monitoring Report, Phase III”
prepared by G.N. Richardson and Associates, dated May 1998, low-flow sampling techniques were used
for groundwater sample collection. Monitoring well construction details from the same report were used
to determine the volume of water in the monitoring wells.Table 1 provides a summary of well
construction details.
At each well, the purge rate and the water level drawdown were monitored as an indicator of how much
stress the purging placed on the aquifer. The purge rates were calculated by recording the time required
to fill a graduated cylinder. The purging flow rates were approximately 100 milliliters/minute (ml/min.).
During purging, the depth to water was periodically monitored and recorded on the field data sheets. For
this event the measured drawdown in the sampled wells was generally less than 3 feet. It is our opinion
that the observed drawdowns were generally minor during purging; therefore, the stresses placed on the
aquifer should have been minor. The observed drawdown data suggests that the purging rates should
have been low enough such that recharge water should not have been overly agitated, reducing the
potential for colloids to be drawn into the well bore.
The purge water from the monitoring wells was monitored in the field for pH, temperature, conductivity,
DO, and ORP using a flow-through cell and multi-meter. Typically, a sample was collected when three
consecutive readings for each individual field parameter fluctuated by no more than 10 percent, between
each equipment volume. The 10% change target stabilization goal was generally reached prior to
collection of the groundwater samples. Turbidity was measured separately, with field measurements less
than or equal to 10 NTUs, as a goal. Even with the use of low flow sampling methods, turbidity values at
some wells remained higher than ideal during purging. Accordingly, some samples were collected based
upon professional judgment without meeting the turbidity goal. The field data collected during sampling
was recorded on the groundwater sampling field data sheets included in Appendix I.Table 2 provides a
summary of the field data collected during this event.
Groundwater samples were collected from the dedicated pump discharge Teflon tubing at the top of each
well. Upon collection, each sample was placed into laboratory supplied containers, placed in a cooler with
ice, and placed under chain-of-custody. The sampling technician wore nitrile gloves, which were changed
between wells to reduce the potential for cross contamination. The groundwater samples collected were
analyzed for Appendix I volatile organic and inorganic constituents. Analyses were conducted by
Environmental Conservation Laboratories, a North Carolina certified laboratory.
4.2 Statistical Analysis of Data
4.2.1 Software
The groundwater analytical data were analyzed using ChemStat 6.2 software package. An Excel
spreadsheet was used to create a data file composed of recent and historic laboratory data. The Excel file
was then converted to a tab delimited file for use by the ChemStat software. The following procedures
were used to carry out statistical analyses of the data for each constituent detected during this monitoring
event.
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 11, 2017 4
4.2.2 Statistical Methods-Groundwater Analyses
In accordance with the NCDEQ-Solid Waste Management Rules 15A NCAC 13B, Section 1632, historical
up-gradient, cross-gradient, and background groundwater monitoring data collected from the monitoring
wells that comprise the Subtitle D monitoring well system were pooled and the analytical results were
used to create a statistical baseline for statistically significant increases in constituent concentrations. This
sampling round (September 2016) will be incorporated into the database for the next round of sampling.
The following procedure was used to analyze each new data set.
♦A descriptive statistics were run to provide mean, standard deviation, variance, and percentage
non-detects.
♦Normality/Data Distribution Tests were run and used to determine the statistical distribution of
the database for each quantified parameter. The data distribution test results were utilized to
determine if a data set exhibits a normal, log-normal or non-normal distribution. Due to the large
number of non-detects and the lack of normality in the data sets, non-parametric statistical
methods were deemed appropriate for the evaluation of the current compliance data set.
♦Time versus concentration graphs were prepared for each parameter detected at a quantifiable
concentration and used to evaluate data trends and to identify potential data outliers. If further
trend analysis was warranted, Mann-Kendall Trend analyses were performed as additional tests
for indications of an upward trend of concentrations over time.
♦Non-Parametric Prediction Interval tests were employed to determine if any individual parameter
concentration detected during this monitoring event represents a Statistically Significant Increase
(SSI) over the historic background concentrations. For all statistical analyses, the non-detect
values were converted to the respective Detection Limit for data analysis.
♦If data indicated a statistically significant increases across the site, the results are examined to
determine the validity of results.
4.3 Stream Sampling
Surface water sampling took place on September 26, 2016. Three stream samples (SW-1, SW-2, SW-3,
and SW-4) were collected in accordance with the approved site Sampling and Analysis Plan. The stream
sample locations are indicated on Figure 2. The surface water samples were collected by immersing
laboratory-supplied containers in the water to be sampled. After collection, the surface water samples
were placed in a cooler with ice and managed under chain-of-custody. All stream samples were analyzed
for Appendix I constituents by Environmental Conservation Laboratories.
5.0 Results
5.1 Groundwater Analytical Results
Table 3 provides a summary of the constituent concentrations reported above the method detection limit
(MDL) for the groundwater samples collected. Concentrations reported between the MDL and the Solid
Waste Section Limits (SWSL) are considered estimated, thus shown as a “J” flagged concentration.Table
4 provides a summary of the reported concentrations which appear to exceed the 15A NCAC 2L
Standards (2L Standard). For some constituents where there is no established 2L Standard, North Carolina
has published Interim Maximum Allowable Concentrations (IMACs). The IMAC values are intended to help
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 11, 2017 5
NCDEQ-SWS in assessing conditions and setting health protective groundwater levels at regulated sites.
As such the IMAC are only interim and not final groundwater quality standards. The following
summarizes the apparent exceedances of the corresponding 2L Standard or IMAC.
Appendix I volatile organic compounds
♦No Appendix I volatile organic compounds were detected during this monitoring event, except
for 2-butanone detected at background monitoring well MW-15. The detected concentrations
was below the corresponding 2L Standard.
Appendix I metals
Appendix I metals barium, chromium, cobalt, copper, nickel, vanadium, and zinc were detected at one or
more of the wells sampled. Many metals occur naturally in groundwater; consequently, the 2L Standards
contain a provision to exempt naturally occurring metal concentrations. Thus a direct comparison of
detected concentrations to these benchmarks is not conclusive evidence of an exceedance. The following
lists constituents with concentrations that appear to exceed the corresponding 2L Standards or IMACs.
♦There is no established 2L Standard for cobalt; however, North Carolina has a published IMAC
established at 1 µg/L. Cobalt concentration reported at well MW-24 was greater than the
corresponding IMAC.
♦There is no established 2L Standard for vanadium; however, North Carolina has published an
IMAC established at 0.3 µg/L. Vanadium concentrations reported at wells MW-17, MW-19, MW-
20, MW-23, and MW-25b were greater than the corresponding IMAC.
The complete laboratory analytical reports are included in Appendix II.
5.2 Statistical Results
5.2.1 Overview of Database
The “Baseline Groundwater Monitoring Report, Phase III Cell, White Street Sanitary Landfill,” prepared by
G.N. Richardson & Associated, dated June 1998, summarizes the baseline monitoring data. The baseline
monitoring samples were collected using the hand bailing procedures outlined in the approved Water
Quality Monitoring Plan. Prior to the October 1998 monitoring event, but subsequent to the Baseline
Groundwater Monitoring Report, the facility’s approved Water Quality Monitoring Plan was modified to
permit the use of dedicated MicroPurge pumps for monitoring well sample collection.
The statistical evaluations discussed herein were only performed on parameters detected during the
subject monitoring event. In this statistical evaluation, non-detects are assigned values equal to their
respective detection limits. This method of handling non-detects was used as part of the statistical
analyses completed as part of the baseline water quality monitoring evaluations as set forth in the
NCDEQ-SWS memo dated January 18, 1995.
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 11, 2017 6
5.2.2 Statistical Analyses
5.2.2.1 Descriptive Statistics
The descriptive statistics program calculates the pooled mean, background mean, pooled standard
deviation, background standard deviation, rank sum, rank mean, and variance for each constituent
detected in each well. The percentages of all sample analyses for which the concentrations are below the
quantitation limits (non-detects) are calculated by constituent for each well.
5.2.2.2 Time vs. Concentration Graphs
The graphs display plots of the concentrations of one parameter for a single well over time. The
concentration is plotted along the vertical axis and the sample dates are plotted along the horizontal axis.
The graphs were used to visually examine changes in concentration over time for a parameter at a given
well. Graphs were only prepared for parameters detected at a given well, during this monitoring event.
The graphs are contained in Appendix III.
♦The time series plots of barium concentrations at background wells and compliance wells
illustrate consistent non-detections of barium prior to the promulgation of the lower SWSLs. The
post 2006 data sets generally exhibits relatively stable concentrations over time.
♦Time series plots of chromium concentrations at well MW-25b depict consistent detections
following the change to a lower SWLS. The majority of the detections were estimated values. The
detected concentrations depict reasonably stable concentrations over time.
♦Time series plots of cobalt concentrations at well MW-24 depict periodic detections following the
change to a lower SWLS. The majority of the detections were estimated values. The detected
concentrations depict reasonably stable concentrations over time.
♦The time series plots of copper concentrations at each compliance well and background well MW-
15 depict consistent non-detections of copper prior to the revised SWSL. The majority of the
detections were estimated values. The post 2006 data set for each well generally exhibit relatively
stable concentrations over time.
♦The time series plots of the concentrations of nickel at compliance wells MW-16, MW-21, and
MW-24 generally illustrate no detections of nickel prior to the revised SWSL. The majority of the
detections were estimated values that exhibit an overall trend of stable concentrations over time.
♦The time series plots of vanadium concentrations at compliance wells MW-17, MW-19, MW-20,
MW-23, and MW-25b illustrate no detections prior to the revised SWSL. The detections coincide
with the revised SWSL, with most detections qualified as estimated values. The post 2006 data
sets depict trends of relatively stable concentrations over time.
The time series plots of the concentrations of zinc at compliance wells MW-16, MW-17, MW-18,
MW-19, MW-20, MW-21, MW-22, MW-24, MW-25, and MW-25b illustrate that the majority of the
detections coincide the revised SWSL, with detected concentrations qualified as estimated values.
The post 2006 data sets generally depict relatively stable concentrations over time.
5.2.2.3 Interwell Statistical Comparisons
Non-parametric Upper Tolerance Intervals were calculated from the background data set to determine if
any detected individual compliance parameter concentration represents a statistically significant increase
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 11, 2017 7
over the historic background concentrations. This test compares the current sampling event analytical
data for each compliance well to Upper Limits computed from the pooled background data set.
5.2.2.4 Non-Parametric Prediction Interval Test
In order to analyze the laboratory analytical results for evidence of statistically significant increases (SSIs)
over background values, the data distribution of the detected monitored constituents was first analyzed.
The data distribution tests indicated a non-parametric distribution for most wells and constituents, mostly
due to a relatively high percentage of non-detects in the analyzed database. As a result, Non-Parametric
Prediction Interval tests were employed to determine if any individual parameter concentration detected
during this monitoring event represents a Statistically Significant Increase (SSI) over the historic
background concentrations. The statistical analyses suggest that no SSIs occurred during this monitoring
event. This finding is supported by the trend observation made of the time vs concentration graphs
discussed in Section 5.2.2.2.
5.3 Hydraulic Conductivity
In-situ hydraulic conductivity tests were performed by G.N. Richardson and Associates, Inc. (GNRA) on
wells MW-16, MW-17, MW-18, MW-20, MW-21, MW-23, MW-25, during January 1998, with monitoring
wells MW-15, MW-19, MW-22, MW-24, and MW-25D tested during March 1998. The data from these
tests yielded hydraulic conductivity values ranging from 0.090 feet/day (in MW-24) to 3.269 feet/day (in
MW-18). A complete discussion of the test methods and calculations was presented in the “Baseline
Groundwater Monitoring Report, Phase III” prepared by G.N. Richardson and Associates, dated May 1998.
The data summarized in Table 5 was used to calculate groundwater flow velocities for compliance
network wells located at points around the perimeter of the monitored unit.
5.4 Groundwater Flow Direction and Rate
The static water levels in the Phase III monitoring wells were measured on September 27 and September
28, 2016. The depth to the water table ranged from 3.71 feet to 27.63 feet below the top of well casing.
Groundwater elevation, top of well casing elevations, and the monitored aquifer unit data for each well
are presented in Table 1. A groundwater contour map was constructed using the data collected during
this event and is presented as Figure 1. Based on the data collected, groundwater appears to be flowing
north-northwest beneath the west half of Phase III and generally to the north-northeast in the eastern half
of Phase III. The groundwater gradient at each well was calculated assuming a constant groundwater
gradient along the flow line between adjacent up-gradient groundwater elevation contour line and the
monitoring well.
Based on a variation of Darcy’s Law, the rate of groundwater movement within the regolith aquifer was
calculated at each monitoring well using the following equation:
V = Ki ÷ n
Where V = velocity (feet/day)
K = hydraulic conductivity (feet/day)
i = groundwater gradient (feet/foot)
n =effective porosity (dimensionless)
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 11, 2017 8
Calculated hydraulic conductivity and gradient values and estimated effective porosity values for each well
were used in the velocity calculations. The 20 percent effective porosity value is based on porosity and
specific yield versus grain size distribution relationships presented in Fetter (1988), and is typical of the
types of soils (predominantly silts and sandy silts with some clays) comprising the regolith at the landfill.
The calculated groundwater velocities ranged from 0.008 feet/day at well MW-24 to 0.365 feet/day at well
MW-25 and are summarized in Table 5.
5.5 Surface Water
Table 6 provides a summary of the constituent concentrations reported above the method detection limit
(MDL) for the surface water samples collected. Concentrations reported between the MDL and the Solid
Waste Section Limits (SWSL) are considered estimated, thus shown as a “J” flagged concentration. The
table also includes the corresponding 15A NCAC 2B Standard (2B Standard) for stream classified by
NCDEQ as Water Supply (WS), if a WS standard is published. Three Appendix I volatile organic
compounds were detected. Seven Appendix I metals were detected.Table 7 provides a summary of the
reported concentrations which would appear to exceed the corresponding 2B Standard. The following
summarizes the exceedances of the 2B Standards for this monitoring event.
♦No target constituents were detected above the 2B Standards during the September 2016
sampling event, except for copper. The copper concentrations upstream of the facility were
similar to those detected down-stream. Immediate upstream sources include a municipal
wastewater treatment plant. Based on these findings, the Phase 3 is not believe to be the source
of the apparent copper 2B Standard exceedance.
The complete laboratory analytical report is included in Appendix II.
5.6 Leachate Sample Analytical Results
On September 26, 2016, a sample of leachate was collected from the leachate wet well. The collected
sample was submitted for laboratory analyses for Appendix I constituents plus Nitrate, Sulfur, Sulfate,
Phosphate, Biological Oxygen Demand and Chemical Oxygen Demand.Table 8 provides a summary of
the associated analytical results.
5.7 Quality Assurance
A qualitative review of the data was performed to verify that the detected concentrations in the laboratory
report were of known quality. A formal, quantitative data validation was not performed. Laboratory-
assigned data qualifiers were evaluated to verify that rejected or unsupportable data were not included in
the dataset. Quality control data provided in the laboratory reports were also reviewed. No rejected or
otherwise unacceptable quality data were reported from the laboratory.
During this event a duplicate sample was collected from monitoring well MW-19 and submitted for
analysis as "Duplicate III." This sample was analyzed for Appendix I constituents. The detected
constituents and concentration reported for well MW-19 were similar to the concentrations reported in
the sample labeled "Duplicate III" suggesting a good correlation between the paired analytical results.
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 11, 2017 9
Trip blank samples accompanied the sample bottles from the time they left the laboratory until they
returned. These samples were analyzed for Appendix I volatile organic and inorganic constituents. No
volatile organic or inorganic constituents were present in the trip blank samples at detectable levels.
Laboratory QC samples were analyzed for all constituents included in this sampling event. The results of
the duplicate, trip blank and laboratory QC sample analyses are included in Appendix II.
6.0 References
Fetter, C. W., 1988, Applied Hydrogeology, New York; Macmillan Publishing Company, 1988, 592 pp.
North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources,
Division of Environmental Management, Subchapter 2L, Classifications and Water Quality Standards
Applicable to the Groundwaters of North Carolina, Sections .0100, .0200, and .0300; from the
Environmental Management Commission Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources,
Division of Environmental Management, Subchapter 2B, Classifications and Water Quality Standards
Applicable to the Surface Waters of North Carolina, Section .0200; from the Environmental Management
Commission, Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources,
Division of Solid Waste Management, subchapter 13B, Solid Waste Management, Section .1600.
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 11, 2017 10
7.0 Certification
I hereby certify this 11
th day of January 2017 that this report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision.
______________________________
Edmund Q.B. Henriques, L.G.
Senior Geologist / Project Manager
Technical support provided by:
______________________________
B. Summers Long
Staff Professional
Appendices
Tables
TABLE 1
WELL CONSTRUCTION AND GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA
PHASE 3 - PERMIT # 41-12
WHITE STREET LANDFILL
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
S&ME PROJECT NO. 1584-98-081C
Well ID
Date
Installed
Total
Depth
Well
Diameter
Depth to
Top of
Screen
Well Screen
Interval Geology of Screened Northing Easting
Ground
Elevation
Top of Casing
Elevation
Depth to
Groundwater1
Groundwater
Elevation
Interval NAD 83 NAD 83 NAVD 88 NAVD 88 Sep-16 Sep-16
(feet)(inches)(feet)(feet bgs)(feet msl.)(feet msl.)(feet)(feet msl.)
MW-15 11/18/1997 60.0 2 45.0 45 - 60 water table aquifer 1783971.29 857176.76 Not measured 794.81 27.63 767.18
MW-16 11/19/1997 28.5 2 13.5 13.5 - 28.5 water table aquifer 1785497.62 857278.58 Not measured 758.02 24.01 734.01
MW-17 11/10/1997 31.5 2 21.5 21.5 - 31.5 water table aquifer 1785250.50 857781.89 Not measured 755.05 EDRE EDRE
MW-18 12/10/1997 17.5 2 7.5 7.5 - 17.5 water table aquifer 1785289.10 858310.99 Not measured 742.70 10.69 732.01
MW-19 4/28/1998 35.0 2 20.0 20 - 35 water table aquifer 1785224.00 858805.30 Not measured 740.70 17.31 723.39
MW-20 11/21/1997 25.0 2 10.0 10 - 25 water table aquifer 1784508.67 858896.54 Not measured 748.87 15.01 733.86
MW-21 11/20/1997 18.5 2 4.5 4.5 - 18.5 water table aquifer 1784125.81 858871.51 Not measured 743.32 6.90 736.42
MW-22 2/19/1998 30.0 2 15.0 15 - 30 water table aquifer 1783634.95 858820.30 Not measured 744.43 10.93 733.50
MW-23 11/18/1997 33.5 2 18.5 18.5 - 33.5 water table aquifer 1783362.23 858516.99 Not measured 744.25 12.54 731.71
MW-24 11/12/1997 12.0 2 4.0 4 - 12 water table aquifer 1783438.34 857897.71 Not measured 752.52 3.71 748.81
MW-25 12/11/1997 17.0 2 7.0 7 - 17 water table aquifer 1785043.38 858973.32 Not measured 746.47 13.77 732.70
MW-25b 12/11/1997 32.0 2 27.0 27 - 32 upper bedrock aquifer 1785039.23 858973.68 Not measured 746.19 14.11 732.08
City of Greensboro provided the top of casing elevations and ground surface elevations
Well Construction details obtained from Well Construction Records reported by HDR, Inc.
feet bgs. = feet below ground surface
feet msl. = feet mean sea level
Depth to Groundwater
1 = below top of casing
T:\Projects\1998\ENV\081C White Street Landfill (2014)\2016 Compliance Monitoring\Fall 2016\Phase 3\Phase3_September_2016 tables.xlsx
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD PARAMETERS
PHASE 3 - PERMIT # 41-12
WHITE STREET LANDFILL
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
S&ME PROJECT NO. 1584-98-081C
DATE WELL WELL
TOP OF
CASING DEPTH TO WATER ODOR PURGE PUMP WELL EVAC PURGED TEMP pH SPECIFIC ORP DO TURBIDITY
ID DEPTH ELEVATION WATER ELEVATION METHOD RATE VOLUME VOLUME DRY?CONDUCTANCE
(feet)(feet msl.)(feet)(feet)(mL/min)(gallons)(gallons)(yes/no)(deg C)(SU)(μs/cm)(mV-NHE)(mg/L)(NTU)
9/27/2016 MW-15 60.0 794.81 27.63 767.18 None Low Flow 100 5.3 0.9 no 18.94 7.05 0.234 -42 1.77 1.44
9/28/2016 MW-16 28.5 758.02 24.01 734.01 None Low Flow 100 0.98 1.0 no 19.50 5.58 0.163 -63 1.15 5.23
9/28/2016 MW-17 31.5 755.05 EDRE EDRE None Low Flow 100 3.1 0.8 no 18.86 5.01 0.119 144 1.28 1.35
9/27/2016 MW-18 17.5 742.70 10.69 732.01 None Low Flow 100 1.5 0.9 no 20.92 6.02 0.144 -12 1.99 1.91
9/27/2016 MW-19 35.0 740.70 17.31 723.39 None Low Flow 100 2.9 0.9 no 18.25 5.77 0.166 116 2.17 3.51
9/27/2016 MW-20 25.0 748.87 15.01 733.86 None Low Flow 100 1.6 0.8 no 18.80 6.41 0.350 71 1.33 1.26
9/27/2016 MW-21 18.5 743.32 6.90 736.42 None Low Flow 100 2.1 0.8 no 22.91 5.77 0.169 72 1.26 1.65
9/27/2016 MW-22 30.0 744.43 10.93 733.50 None Low Flow 100 3.1 1.6 no 22.42 5.96 0.272 2 0.38 1.80
9/27/2016 MW-23 33.5 744.25 12.54 731.71 None Low Flow 100 3.3 0.8 no 22.84 7.28 0.366 -97 0.84 1.35
9/27/2016 MW-24 12.0 752.52 3.71 748.81 None Low Flow 100 1.4 0.8 no 23.64 6.67 0.730 -115 1.48 2.00
9/27/2016 MW-25 17.0 746.47 13.77 732.70 None Low Flow 100 1.0 0.0 yes NM*NM*NM*NM*NM*NM*
9/27/2016 MW-25b 32.0 746.19 14.11 732.08 None Low Flow 100 3.2 0.8 no 18.69 5.87 0.086 87 3.58 0.49
Notes:
1. Field sampling performed by S&ME personnel.
2. TEMP = groundwater temperature, measured in degrees Celsius
3. Pump Rate, measured in milliliters/minute
4. Specific Conductance, measured in μs/cm indicates micro Siemens per centimeter.
5. SU indicates Standard Units.
6. NTU indicates Nephelometric Turbidity Units.
7. ORP = Oxidation Reduction Potential, mV-NHE indicates millivolts-Normal Hydrogen Electrode.
8. EVAC = evacuated volume of groundwater
9. DO = dissolved oxygen, measured in milligrams per liter
10. Dry = water level is below the bottom of the dedicated well pump. Well not sampled
11. NM*= Not measured due toinsuffienct volume of water in well
12. EDRE = Electronic Data Recording Error, data lost
T:\Projects\1998\ENV\081C White Street Landfill (2014)\2016 Compliance Monitoring\Fall 2016\Phase 3\Phase3_September_2016 tables.xlsx
MDL NC SWSL NCAC 2L NCDEQ Federal
Well ID MW-15 MW-16 MW-17 MW-18 MW-19 MW-20 MW-21 MW-22 MW-23 MW-24 MW-25b DuplicateIII Standard IMAC MCLs
Sample ID 4112-MW15 4112-MW16 4112-MW17 4112-MW18 4112-MW19 4112-MW20 4112-MW21 4112-MW22 4112-MW23 4112-MW24 4112-MW26 4112-DuplicateIII
Date Collected 09/27/16 09/28/16 09/28/16 09/27/16 09/27/16 09/27/16 09/27/16 09/27/16 09/27/16 09/27/16 09/27/16 09/27/16
Detected Analytes (µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)
141 2-Butanone 17J <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 1.3 100 4,000 --ns
15 Barium 27.7J 110 51.1J 29.3J 26.9J 48.4J 50.0J 137 53.3J 344 21.1J 25.7J 1.00 100 700 --2,000
51 Chromium <1.40 <1.40 <1.40 <1.40 <1.40 <1.40 <1.40 <1.40 <1.40 <1.40 1.53J <1.40 1.40 10 10 --1,000
53 Cobalt <1.10 <1.10 <1.10 <1.10 <1.10 <1.10 <1.10 <1.10 <1.10 4.40J <1.10 <1.10 1.10 10 ns 1 ns
54 Copper 4.18J 9.16J 4.70J 4.69J 5.87J 4.17J 5.79J 3.98J 1.86J 5.45J 5.15J 6.49J 1.60 10 1,000 --1,000
152 Nickel <2.20 3.98J <2.20 <2.20 <2.20 <2.20 2.65J <2.20 <2.20 3.25J <2.20 <2.20 2.20 50 100 --ns
209 Vanadium <1.40 <1.40 1.76J <1.40 4.71J 5.51J <1.40 <1.40 1.59J <1.40 3.11J 3.98J 1.40 25 ns 0.3 ns
213 Zinc 6.64J 21.2 13.6 12.8 10.7 6.23J 18.5 26.2 <4.40 8.19J 19.0 10.6 4.40 10 1,000 --5,000
µg/L =concentrations reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L)
< = concentrations is less than the method detection limit shown
shaded cells indicate parameter detected above the MDL
NC SWSL = North Carolina Solid Waste Section Limit
J = Concentration reported greater than the method detection limit but less than the SWSL, thus it is considered estimated
NCAC 2L Standards = 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2L .0200, GW Quality Standards for Class GA groundwater. Concentrations in BOLD exceed the corresponding 2L Standard
NCDEQ IMAC = Interim Maximum Allowed Concentration, NCDEQ
Federal MCL = Maximum Concentration Levels, USEPA
ns = no MCL listed, USEPA and/or no NCAC 2L standard Listed
na = not analyzed
Appendix I Volatile Organic Compounds
Solid
Waste
Section
ID #
Sample Locations
Appendix I Metals
S&ME PROJECT NO. 1584-98-081C
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALYSES RESULTS - DETECTIONS
PHASE 3 - PERMIT # 41-12
WHITE STREET LANDFILL
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
T:\Projects\1998\ENV\081C White Street Landfill (2014)\2016 Compliance Monitoring\Fall 2016\Phase 3\Phase3_September_2016 tables.xlsx
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF APPARENT 2L GROUNDWATER STANDARD EXCEEDANCES
PHASE 3 - PERMIT # 41-12
WHITE STREET LANDFILL
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
S&ME PROJECT NO. 1584-98-081C
NCAC 2L NCDEQ Federal
Well ID MW-16 MW-17 MW-19 MW-20 MW-23 MW-24 MW-25b DuplicateIII IMAC MCLs
Sample ID 4112-MW16 4112-MW17 4112-MW19 4112-MW20 4112-MW23 4112-MW24 4112-MW26 4112-DuplicateIII
Date Collected 09/28/16 09/28/16 09/27/16 09/27/16 09/27/16 09/27/16 09/27/16 09/27/16
Detected Analytes (µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)
--------
53 Cobalt 4.40J ns 1 ns
209 Vanadium 1.76J 4.71J 5.51J 1.59J 3.11J 3.98J ns 0.3 ns
ug/L = concentrations reported in micrograms per liter (ug/L)
NC SWSL = North Carolina Solid Waste Section Limit
NCAC 2L Standards = 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2L .0200, GW Quality Standards for Class GA groundwater.
NCDEQ IMAC = Interim Maximum Allowed Concentration, NCDEQ
Concentration greater than the NCAC 2L Standards or NCDENR IMAC are shown in bold
Federal MCL = Maximum Concentration Levels, USEPA
ns = no MCL listed, USEPA and/or no NCAC 2L standard listed
Blank cell indicates no apparent 2L Standard or IMAC exceedance detected.
Solid Waste
Section ID #
No 2L Groundwater Standard
Exceedances Detected
Appendix I Volatile Organic Compounds
Appendix I Metals
T:\Projects\1998\ENV\081C White Street Landfill (2014)\2016 Compliance Monitoring\Fall 2016\Phase 3\Phase3_September_2016 tables.xlsx
Well No.Hydraulic Porosity Gradient Groundwater
Conductivity Velocity
(K = feet/day)(n = %)(I = feet/foot)(V= feet/day)
MW-15 0.265 0.20 0.024 0.031
MW-16 0.331 0.20 0.044 0.073
MW-17 0.160 0.20 NA NA
MW-18 3.269 0.20 0.020 0.325
MW-19 0.716 0.20 0.026 0.093
MW-20 1.336 0.20 0.014 0.094
MW-21 0.681 0.20 0.018 0.060
MW-22 0.325 0.20 0.020 0.033
MW-23 0.173 0.20 0.042 0.036
MW-24 0.090 0.20 0.017 0.008
MW-25 2.088 0.20 0.035 0.365
MW-25D 0.827 0.20 NA NA
Notes: Hydraulic Conductivity's from slug test data: G.N. Richardson & Associates
Porosity values from published literature, based on soil types
Velocity calculated using V = KI/n
NA = Not Applicable, deeper aquifer monitoring well
WO = Well obstruction - no water level available for gradient calculation
S&ME PROJECT NO. 1584-98-081C
TABLE 5
GROUNDWATER VELOCITY DATA - SEPTEMBER 2016
WHITE STREET LANDFILL
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
PHASE 3 - PERMIT #41-12
T:\Projects\1998\ENV\081C White Street Landfill (2014)\2016 Compliance Monitoring\Fall 2016\Phase 3\Phase3_September_2016 tables.xlsx
MDL NC SWSL NCAC 2B
Sample Location SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SW-4 Standards*
Sample ID 4103-SW1 4103-SW2 4103-SW3 4103-SW4
Date Collected 09/26/16 09/26/16 09/26/16 09/26/16
Detected Analytes
(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)
3 Acetone <10 11 J <10 <10 10 100 no standard
44 Chloroform <0.18 <0.18 1.6 J <0.18 0.18 5 no standard
196 Toluene <0.14 1.1 <0.14 <0.14 0.14 1 11
15 Barium 44.8 J 52.8 J 17.6 J 27.9 J 1.00 100 1000
53 Cobalt <1.10 1.30 J <1.10 <1.10 1.1 10 no standard
54 Copper 4.52 J 2.57 J 6.61 J 6.03 J 1.6 10 2.7
152 Nickel <2.20 <2.20 3.54 J 3.34 J 1.8 50 25
194 Thallium 0.190 J 0.124 J 0.205 J 0.187 J 0.110 5.5 no standard
209 Vanadium 1.95 J <1.40 <1.40 1.64 J 25 25 no standard
213 Zinc 5.08 J 5.21 J 20 16.4 3.80 10 36
J = Concentration reported greater than the MDL but less than the SWSL, thus it is considered estimated
* = Title 15A NCAC 2B Standards for all Water Supply Classifications
µg/L =concentrations reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L)
< = concentrations is less than the method detection limit shown
NC SWSL = North Carolina Solid Waste Section Limit
TABLE 6
SUMMARY OF SURFACE WATER ANALYSES RESULTS - DETECTIONS
PHASE 3 - PERMIT # 41-12
WHITE STREET LANDFILL
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Solid Waste
Section
ID #
Sample Locations
Appendix I Volatile Organic Compounds
Appendix I Metals
S&ME PROJECT NO. 1584-98-081C
T:\Projects\1998\ENV\081C White Street Landfill (2014)\2016 Compliance Monitoring\Fall 2016\Phase 3\Phase3_September_2016 tables.xlsx
TABLE 7
SUMMARY OF 2B SURFACE STANDARD EXCEEDANCES
PHASE 3 - PERMIT # 41-12
WHITE STREET LANDFILL
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
S&ME PROJECT NO. 1584-98-081C
Sample Locations NC SWSL NCAC 2B
Sample Location SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SW-4 Standards*
Sample ID 4103-SW1 4103-SW2 4103-SW3 4103-SW4
Date Collected 09/26/16 09/26/16 09/26/16 09/26/16
Detected Analytes
(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)
54 Copper 4.52 J 6.61 J 6.03 J 10 2.7
µg/L =concentrations reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L)
< =concentrations is less than the method detection limit shown
NC SWSL = North Carolina Solid Waste Section Limit
* = Title 15A NCAC 2B Standards for all Water Supply Classifications
J =Concentration reported is greater than the MDL but is less than the SWSL, thus it is considered estimated
Concentrations in bold print exceed the corresponding NCAC 2B Standard
Blank cell indicates no 2B Standard exceedance detected.
Solid Waste
Section ID #
Appendix I Metals
Sample ID = Leachate Sample Collected 9/26/16
Parameter SWS ID Units Result MDL SWSL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 71 µg/L 8.8 JD 1.9 10
2-Butanone 141 µg/L 410 D 13 100
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 147 µg/L 14 JD 11 100
Acetone 3 µg/L 410 D 12 100
Ethylbenzene 110 µg/L 8.2 JD 1.3 1
Toluene 196 µg/L 15 D 1.4 1
Xylenes 346 µg/L 42 D 4.5 5
Arsenic 14 µg/L 24.3 6.80 10
Barium 15 µg/L 727 1.00 100
Chromium 51 µg/L 20.7 1.40 10
Cobalt 53 µg/L 18.7 1.10 10
Copper 54 µg/L 6.80 J 1.60 10
Nickel 152 µg/L 106 2.20 50
Thallium 194 µg/L 3.74 JD 1.10 5.5
Vanadium 209 µg/L 36.0 1.40 25
Zinc 213 µg/L 11.8 3.80 10
Nitrate 303 µg/L 100 25 10,000
Phosphorus none µg/L 3600 BD 50 NE
pH 321 s.u.6.9 1.0 NE
BOD 316 mg/L 60 2,000 NE
COD 317 mg/L 710 20,000 NE
J = Analyte detected; value is between the Method Detection Limit (MDL) and PQL
NE = Not Established
D = Analyte Value Determined with sample dilution
B = The analyte was detected in the associated method blank.
NC SWSL = North Carolina Solid Waste Section Limit
MDL = Method Detection Limit
Target compounds not detected are not listed
Miscellaneous Parameters
Appendix I Metals
Appendix I Volatile Organic Compounds
S&ME PROJECT NO. 1584-98-081C
TABLE 8
SUMMARY OF LEACHATE SAMPLE ANALYSES
PHASE 3 - PERMIT # 41-12
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
T:\Projects\1998\ENV\081C White Street Landfill (2014)\2016 Compliance Monitoring\Fall 2016\Phase 3\Phase3_September_2016 tables.xlsx
Figures
MW-13
MW-15
MW-24
MW-23
MW-22
MW-21
MW-20 MW-25d
MW-25
MW-19
MW-18
MW-17
MW-16
MW-13
7
3
6
.
0
7
3
0
.
0
7
5
0
.
0
76
0
.
0
7
5
4
.
0
7
2
8
.
0
7
2
4
.
0
7
3
2
.
0
7
3
4
.
0
7
4
0
.
0
7
4
2
.
0
7
4
6
.
0
7
4
4
.
0
7
4
8
.
0
7
5
6
.
0
7
5
8
.
0
7
6
2
.
0
7
6
4
.
0
7
5
2
.
0
7
6
6
.
0
7
2
6
.
0
7
3
8
.
0
APROXIMATE GROUNDWATER
LEGEND
CELL LIMITS
PROPERTY LINE
MONITOR WELL LOCATION
ESTIMATED GROUNDWATERELEVATION (SEPTEMBER 2016)
FLOW DIRECTION
GR
O
U
N
D
W
A
T
E
R

F
L
O
W

M
A
P
WH
I
T
E

S
T
R
E
E
T

L
A
N
D
F
I
L
L
GR
E
E
N
S
B
O
R
O
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
AS

S
H
O
W
N
RD
M
EQ
B
H
15
8
4
-
9
8
-
0
8
1
C
DE
C
E
M
B
E
R

2
0
1
6
1
PH
A
S
E

I
I
I
CALCULATED FOR THE 9/16 EVENTGROUNDWATER ELEVATION AS

(723.39)
(732.01)
(NO DATA)
(767.18)
(731.71)
(733.50)
(736.42)
(733.86)
(748.81)
(734.01)
PHASE III
(732.08)(732.08)(732.08)
(732.70)
(734.01)
STREAM SAMPLE LOCATION
WHITE STREET LANDFILL
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
AS SHOWN DSB/RDM BSL
1584-98-081C DECEMBER 2016 2
PHASE III
0
G
R
A
P
H
I
C

S
C
A
L
E
8
0
0
4
0
0
8
0
0
S
C
A
L
E
:

1
"

=

8
0
0
'
LEGENDSTREAM SAMPLE LOCATION"
Appendix I – Field Sampling Data Sheets
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
-15.63 feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 1720 Stop 1755
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3 sec.Start 1755 Stop 1805
Off: 27 sec.
Pressure: 40 psi
2" well:
height:-15.63 x .163 =-2.54769
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
1720
1725 21.47 6.48 0.187 32 5.13 5.57 28.55
1730 20.19 6.78 0.213 -1 3.93 3.44 29.12
175 19.61 6.90 0.231 -28 2.43 2.23 29.60
1740 19.19 6.97 0.237 -46 1.66 1.89 30.17
1745 19.04 7.04 0.235 -48 1.61 1.67 30.83
1750 19.00 7.05 0.235 -44 1.82 1.85 31.20
1755 18.94 7.05 0.234 -42 1.77 1.44 31.69
Final Readings 1755 9/27/2016 18.94 7.05 0.234 -42 1.77 1.44 31.69
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-MW15
Gary Simcox
Depth to water from measuring point:27.63
1805
Cloudy
75 *F
Water Level & Well Data
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:12.00
Height of water column:
Bladder Pump
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Bladder Pump Purge Time
Sample Collection Time
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 4.0
100
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
-12.01 feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 935 Stop 1005
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3.0 sec.Start 1005 Stop 1015
Off: 27.0 sec.
Pressure:psi
2" well:
height:-12.01 x .163 =-1.95763
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
935
940 19.05 5.50 0.167 -52 4.79 14.40 24.42
945 18.84 5.53 0.170 -80 2.91 8.86 24.65
950 18.92 5.50 0.168 -81 1.88 5.77 24.83
955 19.15 5.54 0.163 -75 1.35 5.64 25.02
1000 19.33 5.55 0.163 -66 1.23 5.53 25.15
1005 19.50 5.58 0.163 -63 1.15 5.23 25.21
!
Final Readings 1005 9/28/2016 19.50 5.58 0.163 -63 1.15 5.23 25.21
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 4.0
Bladder Pump
100 Sample Collection Time
Was well purged dry
Bladder Pump Purge Time
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Water Level & Well Data
Depth to water from measuring point:24.01
1015
Height of water column:
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Cloudy
80 *FGary Simcox
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:12.00
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-MW16
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
-28825
feet
feet
feet
855
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 825 Stop 855
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3.0 sec.Start 855 Stop 905
Off: 27.0 sec.
Pressure: 20 psi
2" well:
height:845 x .163 =137.735
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
825
830 20.00 6.01 0.199 63 5.34 3.08 14.73
835 19.38 5.49 0.168 99 3.95 2.17 14.91
840 19.05 5.20 0.141 123 2.81 1.82 15.04
845 18.92 5.06 0.128 135 1.97 1.70 15.19
850 18.94 4.99 0.122 145 1.55 1.61 15.24
855 18.86 5.01 0.119 144 1.28 1.35 15.29
Final Readings 855 9/28/2016 18.86 5.01 0.119 144 1.28 1.35 15.29
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-MW17
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
Depth to water from measuring point:835.00
Bladder Pump Purge Time
12.00
Measuring point:850
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
905
Cloudy
75 *F
830
Gary Simcox
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 4.0
100 Sample Collection Time
Bladder Pump
Height of water column:845.00
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 1350 Stop 1430
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3.0 sec.Start 1430 Stop 1440
Off: 27.0 sec.
Pressure: 19 psi
2" well:
height:1.31 x .163 =0.21353
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
1535
1540 23.18 6.70 0.441 -47 3.14 4.71 10.93
1545 22.06 6.63 0.337 -41 2.95 3.92 10.91
1550 21.39 6.39 0.227 -32 2.62 3.04 11.00
1555 21.03 6.17 0.176 -23 2.26 2.00 10.97
1600 20.99 6.09 0.159 -19 2.08 1.95 10.98
1605 20.93 6.06 0.152 -16 2.01 2.15 11.00
1610 20.89 6.02 0.146 -13 2.01 2.24 10.99
1615 20.92 6.02 0.144 -12 1.99 1.91 10.97
Final Readings 1430 9/27/2016 20.92 6.02 0.144 -12 1.99 1.91 10.97
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
Field Analyses
Bladder Pump
100 Sample Collection Time
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 7.0
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Was well purged dry
Bladder Pump Purge Time
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:12.00
Height of water column:
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Depth to water from measuring point:10.69
1440
P/Cloudy
85 *F
1.31
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Water Level & Well Data
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-MW18
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Gary Simcox
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
Water Level & Well Data
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 745 Stop 820
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3.0 sec.Start 820 Stop 830
Off: 27.0 sec.
Pressure: 26 psi
Note: Duplicate III taken at this location. (0800 hrs)
2" well:
height:-5.31 x .163 =0 830
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
745
750 18.54 5.80 0.222 89 6.13 12.80 17.53
755 18.16 5.81 0.192 98 3.04 6.72 17.54
800 18.17 5.72 0.181 104 2.88 5.16 17.57
805 18.23 5.74 0.174 110 2.50 4.36 17.55
810 18.20 5.75 0.171 114 2.41 4.45 17.54
815 18.27 5.73 0.168 115 2.13 3.74 17.56
820 18.25 5.77 0.166 116 2.17 3.51 17.50
Final Readings 820 9/27/2016 18.25 5.77 0.166 116 2.17 3.51 17.50
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Depth to water from measuring point:17.31
830
Cloudy/Drizzle
-5.31
Gary Simcox
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Height of water column:
70 *F
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:12.00
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-MW19
Bladder Pump
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Bladder Pump Purge Time
Sample Collection Time100
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 4.0
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 1000 Stop 1030
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3.0 sec.Start 1030 Stop 1040
Off: 27.0 sec.
Pressure: 24 psi
2" well:
height:-3.01 x .163 =-0.49063
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
1000
1005 18.54 6.20 0.218 94 5.30 3.01 15.37
1010 18.35 6.24 0.321 86 2.86 2.32 15.47
1015 18.34 6.30 0.340 82 2.19 2.00 15.48
1020 18.48 6.35 0.349 78 1.74 1.53 15.47
1025 18.73 6.42 0.351 73 1.56 1.41 15.47
1030 18.80 6.41 0.350 71 1.33 1.26 15.48
Final Readings 1030 9/27/2016 18.80 6.41 0.350 71 1.33 1.26 15.48
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-MW20
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Depth to water from measuring point:15.01
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Bladder Pump Purge Time
12.00
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
1040
Cloudy
75 *F
Water Level & Well Data
Gary Simcox
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 4.0
100 Sample Collection Time
Bladder Pump
Height of water column:-3.01
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 1110 Stop 1140
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3.0 sec.Start 1140 Stop 1150
Off: 27.0 sec.
Pressure: 20 psi
2" well:
height:5.1 x .163 =0.8313
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
1110
1115 20.57 6.40 0.266 76 3.78 2.71 7.15
1120 20.56 6.08 0.203 75 2.87 2.23 7.19
1125 20.76 5.92 0.179 77 2.27 2.37 7.23
1130 21.08 5.85 0.169 78 1.82 2.00 7.24
1135 21.81 5.79 0.167 76 1.51 1.82 7.23
1140 22.91 5.77 0.169 72 1.26 1.65 7.22
Final Readings 1140 9/27/2016 22.91 5.77 0.169 72 1.26 1.65 7.22
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-MW21
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Depth to water from measuring point:6.90
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Bladder Pump Purge Time
12.00
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
1150
Cloudy
75 *FGary Simcox
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 4.0
100 Sample Collection Time
Bladder Pump
Height of water column:5.10
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 1205 Stop 1305
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3.0 sec.Start 1305 Stop 1315
Off: 27.0 sec.
Pressure: 21 psi
2" well:
height:1.07 x .163 =0.17441
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
1205
1210 21.73 6.17 0.266 46 2.80 2.46 11.55
1215 20.77 6.33 0.334 -33 2.53 5.03 11.81
1220 20.34 6.43 0.377 -57 1.78 5.47 12.04
1225 20.14 6.39 0.373 -50 1.11 6.14 12.41
1230 20.32 6.33 0.361 -40 0.88 4.51 12.70
1235 20.81 6.32 0.352 -31 0.76 4.57 12.91
1240 21.46 6.27 0.343 -23 0.65 4.03 13.21
1245 21.91 6.21 0.332 -20 0.58 3.54 13.55
1250 22.00 6.15 0.318 -12 0.51 3.33 13.75
1255 22.30 6.06 0.299 -6 0.44 2.33 14.06
1300 9/27/2016 22.33 6.00 0.282 1 0.40 1.93 14.39
1305 9/27/2016 22.42 5.96 0.272 2 0.38 1.80 14.53
Final Readings 1305 9/27/2016 22.42 5.96 0.272 2 0.38 1.80 14.53
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 4.0
Blader Pump
100
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Blader Pump Purge Time
Sample Collection Time
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:12.00
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Height of water column:1.07
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Water Level & Well Data
Depth to water from measuring point:10.93
1315
Cloudy/Drizzle
75 *F
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-MW22
Gary Simcox
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 1325 Stop 1355
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3.5 sec.Start 1355 Stop 1405
Off: 26.5 sec.
Pressure: 30 psi
2" well:
height:-0.54 x .163 =-0.08802
gallons liters x
Yes No x
0
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
1325
1330 23.51 6.16 0.287 25 2.47 6.75 13.20
1335 22.16 6.59 0.328 -60 2.25 3.87 13.59
1340 21.41 6.87 0.342 -96 1.77 2.65 14.29
1345 21.84 7.09 0.353 -97 1.27 2.02 14.75
1350 22.46 7.18 0.361 -99 0.99 1.67 15.13
1355 22.84 7.28 0.366 -97 0.84 1.35 15.66
Final Readings 1355 9/27/2016 22.84 7.28 0.366 -97 0.84 1.35 15.66
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-MW23
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Depth to water from measuring point:12.54
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Blader Pump Purge Time
12.00
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
1405
Cloudy
75 *F
Water Level & Well Data
Gary Simcox
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 4.0
100 Sample Collection Time
Blader Pump
Height of water column:-0.54
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 1430 Stop 1500
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3.0 sec.Start 1500 Stop 1510
Off: 27.0 sec.
Pressure:psi
2" well:
height:8.29 x .163 =1.35127
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
1430
1435 22.88 6.73 0.674 -110 3.33 6.39 4.81
1440 23.50 6.57 0.716 -119 2.12 3.49 5.43
1445 23.81 6.54 0.729 -127 1.79 2.31 5.72
1450 24.09 6.56 0.736 -133 1.47 1.93 6.13
1455 24.04 6.61 0.738 -128 1.37 2.09 6.50
1500 23.64 6.67 0.730 -115 1.48 2.00 6.89
Final Readings 1500 9/27/2016 23.64 6.67 0.730 -115 1.48 2.00 6.89
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 4.0
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Water Level & Well Data
Depth to water from measuring point:3.71
1510
75 *F
White Street Landfill Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
1584-98-081
4112-MW24
Gary Simcox
P/Cloudy
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
100
Blader Pump Purge Time
Measuring point:
Sample Collection Time
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Height of water column:8.29
Blader Pump
Top of Casing
12.00
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start Stop
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3.0 sec.Start Stop
Off: 27.0 sec.
Pressure:psi Notes: Water level w/out pump is 14.10. The bottom
of the pump is set at approx. 14' below TOC.
2" well:
height:-1.77 x .163 =-0.28851
gallons liters x
Yes x No
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
Final Readings 4/18/2016
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-MW25
NA
NA
Depth to water from measuring point:13.77
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Bladder Pump Purge Time
12.00
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
Sunny
85 *F
Water Level & Well Data
Gary Simcox
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 1.0
100 Sample Collection Time
Bladder Pump
Height of water column:-1.77
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet %
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 900 Stop 930
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3.0 sec.Start 930 Stop 940
Off: 27.0 sec.
Pressure: 28 psi
2" well:
height:-2.11 x .163 =-0.34393
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
900
905 19.28 5.99 0.380 90 3.74 3.81 14.44
910 19.07 5.99 0.111 86 3.90 1.69 14.51
915 18.90 5.89 0.098 85 3.87 1.29 14.56
920 18.84 5.91 0.090 85 3.76 0.81 14.53
925 18.74 5.89 0.088 86 3.74 0.45 14.55
930 18.69 5.87 0.086 87 3.58 0.49 14.56
Final Readings 930 9/27/16 18.69 5.87 0.086 87 3.58 0.49 14.56
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 4.0
Sample Collection Time
Bladder Pump
100
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Bladder Pump Purge Time
Height of water column:-2.11
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:12.00
Tuesday, September 27, 20164112-MW25b
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Water Level & Well Data
Depth to water from measuring point:14.11
940
Cloudy
70 *F
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
Gary Simcox
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
0.00 feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start Stop
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On:sec.Start Stop
Off:sec.
Pressure:psi
2" well:
height:0 x .163 =0
gallons liters
Yes No
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
Final Readings 1210 9/26/2016 21.60 7.22 293.000
* C units mS/cm
Measuring point:
Monday, September 26, 2016
Monday, September 26, 2016
Height of water column:
Sample Collection Time
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Purge Time
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed
Was well purged dry
Blank
Water Level & Well Data
Depth to water from measuring point:
1210
1584-98-081
White Street Landfill
4112-SW1
Gary Simcox
Sunny
75 *F
Summit Avenue Bridge
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
0.00 feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start Stop
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On:sec.Start Stop
Off:sec.
Pressure:psi
2" well:
height:0 x .163 =0
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
Final Readings 1130 9/26/2016 20.60 6.75 214.000
* C units mS/cm
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
Monday, September 26, 2016
Monday, September 26, 2016
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-SW2
White Street and Nealtown Road
Height of water column:
Measuring point:
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Purge Time
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Water Level & Well Data
Depth to water from measuring point:
1505
Cloudy
75 *FGary Simcox
Sample Collection Time
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start Stop
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On:sec.Start Stop
Off:sec.
Pressure:psi
2" well:
height:0 x .163 =0
gallons liters
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
Final Readings 1345 9/26/2016 23.80 7.21 439.000
* C units mS/cm
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Water Level & Well Data
Depth to water from measuring point:
1345
75 *F
White Street Landfill Monday, September 26, 2016
Monday, September 26, 2016
1584-98-081
4112-SW3
Gary Simcox
Cloudy
Waste Water Treatment Plant
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
Purge Time
Measuring point:
Sample Collection Time
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Height of water column:0.00
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start Stop
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On:sec.Start Stop
Off:sec.
Pressure:psi
2" well:
height:0 x .163 =0
gallons liters
Yes No
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
Final Readings 1245 9/26/2016 22.50 7.30 412.000
* C units mS/cm
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Water Level & Well Data
1245
Cloudy
75 *F
White Street Landfill Monday, September 26, 2016
1584-98-081
4112-SW4
Gary Simcox
Rankin Mill Road Bridge
Sample Collection Time
Was well purged dry
Purge Time
Volume of water in well
Field Analyses
Monday, September 26, 2016
Measuring point:
Depth to water from measuring point:
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
Height of water column:0.00
Volume of water removed
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
0.00 feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start Stop
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On:sec.Start Stop
Off:sec.
Pressure:psi
2" well:
height:0 x .163 =0
gallons liters
Yes No
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
Final Readings 1210 9/26/2016 21.60 7.22 293.000
* C units mS/cm
Measuring point:
Monday, September 26, 2016
Monday, September 26, 2016
Height of water column:
Sample Collection Time
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Purge Time
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed
Was well purged dry
Blank
Water Level & Well Data
Depth to water from measuring point:
1210
1584-98-081
White Street Landfill
4112-SW1
Gary Simcox
Sunny
75 *F
Summit Avenue Bridge
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
0.00 feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start Stop
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On:sec.Start Stop
Off:sec.
Pressure:psi
2" well:
height:0 x .163 =0
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
Final Readings 1130 9/26/2016 20.60 6.75 214.000
* C units mS/cm
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
Monday, September 26, 2016
Monday, September 26, 2016
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-SW2
White Street and Nealtown Road
Height of water column:
Measuring point:
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Purge Time
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Water Level & Well Data
Depth to water from measuring point:
1505
Cloudy
75 *FGary Simcox
Sample Collection Time
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start Stop
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On:sec.Start Stop
Off:sec.
Pressure:psi
2" well:
height:0 x .163 =0
gallons liters
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
Final Readings 1345 9/26/2016 23.80 7.21 439.000
* C units mS/cm
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Water Level & Well Data
Depth to water from measuring point:
1345
75 *F
White Street Landfill Monday, September 26, 2016
Monday, September 26, 2016
1584-98-081
4112-SW3
Gary Simcox
Cloudy
Waste Water Treatment Plant
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
Purge Time
Measuring point:
Sample Collection Time
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Height of water column:0.00
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start Stop
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On:sec.Start Stop
Off:sec.
Pressure:psi
2" well:
height:0 x .163 =0
gallons liters
Yes No
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
Final Readings 1245 9/26/2016 22.50 7.30 412.000
* C units mS/cm
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Water Level & Well Data
1245
Cloudy
75 *F
White Street Landfill Monday, September 26, 2016
1584-98-081
4112-SW4
Gary Simcox
Rankin Mill Road Bridge
Sample Collection Time
Was well purged dry
Purge Time
Volume of water in well
Field Analyses
Monday, September 26, 2016
Measuring point:
Depth to water from measuring point:
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
Height of water column:0.00
Volume of water removed
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start Stop
Purge Rate gpm
Control Settings On:sec.Start Stop
Off:sec.
Pressure:psi
2" well:
height:0 x .163 =0
gallons x liters
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
Final Readings 1100 9/26/2016 22.60 7.34 427.000
* C units mS/cm
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 0.0
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Water Level & Well Data
Depth to water from measuring point:
1100
75 *F
White Street Landfill Monday, September 26, 2016
Tuesday, September 06, 2016
1584-98-081
4112-SW5
Gary Simcox
Cloudy
Below monitor well II-3
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
Purge Time
Measuring point:
Sample Collection Time
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Height of water column:0.00
Appendix II – Laboratory Analytical Report
Appendix III – Time vs Concentrations Graphs
Appendix IV – NCDEQ EDDS (CD only)