18018_Singer Furniture_Meeting Outline for SMWU 3_20000919

Meeting Outline for SWMU No. '.\
Singer -Miller Hill
Lenoir, North Carolina
September 19, 2000
I. Introduction
A. S inger is Responsible Party and Brookhill is Develop'er
B. SWMU No. 3 parcel separated from larger property in July 2000
C. SWMU No. 3 -former unlined waste glue holding pond (1979 to 1989)
1. Glue was urea-fonnaldehyde adhesive (not solvent based)
2. Primary constituent of concern is formaldehyde
3. All visible glue removed from pond in I 990
D. Soil and ground water data
1. Initial data collected 1995 and 1996
2. Additional data collected as part of 1998 Phase IL-ESA / A 12 ~f) Uollil.d.a.Y-~~~~ -
II. Objectives
A. Close SWMU No. 3 in most efficient and expeditious manner
B. Avoid need for further regulatory requirements and 30-year post-closure
III. Method
A Use existing data to extent possible to meet objectives
B. Supplement with additional data collection efforts
C. Compare data to risk-based standards and/or background to determine if
additional activities are wan-anted
IV. Receptor Update
A. Water supply welJ at 905/905A Virginia St. used for drinking water appx. 550 / " •
-~'"k ') ~ -, \&.)"'(! ~ ~"'--~)
ftfromSWMUNo.3 tvv-~~~~·.~:r.-6q~
B. Well located cross-gradient from SWMU ~ 11P( vc-k., k-~
C. City water is available along Virginia St.
I
TURNER llART t~ H!CltMAiV, PC
1
V. Soil Data w~ tu'~J( y
VI.
A.· 16 soil samples, 4 background samples, 1 duplicate ~ ~ :v.:~-B. Formaldehyde primary constituent of concern q v 1 ~
C. No fonnaldehyde, VOCs, pesticides/herbicides, _or PCBs above industrial or
soil to ground water preliminary remedial goals (PRGs) not"
D. Se, As, and Tl detected above background and PRGs but'\n immediate vicinity
ofSWMUNo. 3
E. Benzo(a)pyrene detected in two background samples at detection limit, but
above industrial PRG
Soil Action: Resarnple to confirm presence or absence of benzo(a)pyrene, Se,
As, and Tl using Level 3 QNQC and appropriate blanks
Ground Water Data
A. 2 downgradient monitoring :wells, 2 background wells, duplicates ( 4 ev~~
B. No detections above standards most recent event (1998) Vl~ ~~ > /;)
C. Inconsistent trace pesticide/PCB detections ~ ~~~, ~ ~
D. Metals detected above background and standards, particularly 1I initial eveti.fso.9 Q ? ~l fi.,1.
(Metal detections potentially related to poorly developed (silty) wells) XJ.s /~
;.,-~ •t.tA C1 ().
Ground Water Action: Resample wells to confirm the presence or absence of full JY'~
list of compounds (VOCs, SVOCs, Pesticides, PCBs, 16 Metals previously ~ r .n
sampled) using low flow techniques and Level III QNQC. Conduct total andj, _ J vJ,,IP"
filtered metal analyses. ~~~
Vll. Surface Water Data
\tf £\(''
A. Partially piped tributary to Lower Creek (Class C)
B. Sampling indicated on piped tributary (SW-6), but data not located ~\tO~~
2
I -I • )M (lltil () (.l1,c..{J/v4'-LuCVH''l w
Tl'RNEU l/ART <~ ll/Cl\MA.'\', PC
Table 3
Formaldehyde (FORM) Soil Screening Level
Singer -Miller Hill Plant
Lenoir, North Carolina
Form. Transport Model for Calculation of Soil-to-Ground Water Screening Level (1)
Parameters Description Value Units
Csoil Maximum soil concentration Calculated mg/kg
Cgw Ground water target concentration 5.5 mg/I
df Dilution factor (Default) 20 unitless
koc Organic-carbon partition coefficient 3.63 I/kg
foe Fraction of organic carbon in soil 0.001 unitless
ks Soil-water partition coefficient (koc"foc) 0.00363 I/kg
Thetaw Water-filled soil porosity (Default) 0.3 Lwater/Lsoil
Thetaa Air-filled soil porosity 0. 13 Lair/Lsoil
Pb Dry bulk density (Default) 1.5 kg/I
H' Henry's Law constant 1.30E-05 unitless
Transport Model: Csoil = Cgw [ks +[(thetaw + theataa*H?!Pb]*df
Screening FORM Soil Concentration (Soil-to-Ground Water)
Csoil = 22.399 mg/kg
22,399 µg/kg
References: (1) NC Groundwater Section Guidelines, Volume I (May 1998)
Chemical Properties:
File:Data,Form
Oate:9/18/00
Montgomery et al. (1991)
Ground water target from EPA Region 9 PRGS (Tap Water)
Assu111e ruta1 pore ail)' ..Q..4
Aest1ffie-fle"fleh:1Fal ~r:iie·~sgrptieR
DRAFT
1
r
•
Ftle:Data,Soil Oala
oe1e:e110100
Sample ID 9WT 10WT 581 SB1 SB2
Oepm (feel) 4-10' 4·8' 1' 1·2' ,.
Units (ug/ka) (ug/kal (uo/kg) (uglkg) (ugfl<g) eara.mmc Formaldehyde NO NO 330 3.600 NO
llOC~ (!!240)
iric:h!cr~lhene NO NO NA NA 6
1, 1·Dicl11oroethene ND No NA NA 6
8entene NO ND NA NA 5
Ace10ne• 10 31 NA NA NA
Toluene NO NO NA NA 6
SllQQs (!!2Z!l)
Bulylbe02ylplllhatatc ND NO NA NA NO
Phenentllfene NO NO NA NA ND
Oi-n-Butvlchth81ete 400 420 NA NA NO
1seN:o(a)py1ene ND NO NA NA NO
Chrysene ND NO NA NA ND
Ben2o<kJn1.101anthene NO NO NA NA ND
Fluoranthene NU NO NA NA NO
Benzo(1>)ftuQ1anlllene NO NO NA NA 4.7
lndeno(1,2.3~.d)pylOne NO NO NA NA NO
Pyrene NO NO NI\ NA 5.7
Anthraeene NO ND NA NA ND
Dl·n-cx:tytphlhelate NO ND NA NA 61 Bis(2~1hylhexy~phtnalate• 400 420 NA NA 30
e~1e1e~1£cas
~.4-DOO NA NA NO NO NA Aldrin NA NA 0.22 NO NA
~
2.4·0 NA NA NO NO NA
Sample ID 9wr 1owr $81 S81 SB2
Deptn (feel) 4·10' 4·8' 1' 1·2' ,.
UnllS (mnlko) (mQJkg) <mglkal (mo/kg) lmg/kal
ll4el1\l:I
SelenNm 8.1 12 NA NA NA
Zinc 37.7 53.4 NA NA NA
Varnidlum 80.2 109 NA NA NA
COPcio>r 16.2 23.8 NA NA NA
1"'°tlall 12.2 17 NA NA NA
Chromium 18 17.9 NA NA NA
Cadmium 2.1 3.1 NA NA NA
Betytlium 1.3 1.9 !".A. ~JA NM
tlarium 221 244 NA NA NA
AJstrnic 10.4 12.2 NA NA NA
Anllmony 4.5 NO NA NA NA
Tin NO NO NA NA NA
The Ill um 1S.3 38.3 NA NA NA
Nickel 9.2 3.3 NA NA NA
Mercuty ND ND NA NA NA
Lead 11,9 14.5 NA NA NA
Iron 28,700 39,900 NA NA NA
Notes:
EPA analytical m!lll\od follows parameler or paremeter group in paren1t\eSe$,
During Ille April 1998 sampllll9 event, voes were ana~ed by EPA ao101ao20.
SB3 S64 565 SB!!
1' 1' 1' 0.5·1'
(ualkgJ luo/kg) loo/kg) luo/~g)
310 13,000 7,800 5,000
NO ND NO ND
NO NO ND NO
ND NO NO NO
NA NA NA NO
NO NO NO NO
ND ND 380 ND
NO ND NO ND
ND NO NO ND
NO ND ND ND
NO No ND NO
NO ND NO NO
NO NO NO NO
NO ND NO NO
NO ND ND NO
No l'<U No NU
ND NO NO NO
NO ND NO ND
380 370 360 690
NA NA NA ND
NA NA NA NO
NA NA NA NO
SB3 SBA SB5 SB6
1' 1' 1' 0.5-1'
(mg/l<Ql (malknl lma/lcol (molkOl
NA NA NA NO
NA NA NA 158
NA NA NA 75.2
NA NA NA 20
NI'\ NA NA 10.2
NA NA NA 16.6
NA NA NA NO
NA NA NA 1.3
NA NA NA 213
NA NA NA 0.59
NA NA NA 0.:37
NA NA NA 1,6
NA NA NA NO
NA NA NA 6,3
NA NA NA om
NA NA NA 10.S
NA NA NA 26,700
SB6 SB7
1-1.5' 0.5•1'
luo/l<o) lualkg)
190 NO
NO ND
NO ND
NO NO
NO NO
NO NO
ND NO
NO NO
NO NO
NO NO
NO ND
NO ND
NO ND
NO ND
NO ND
NO ND
NO NO
NO ND
410 390
ND NO
NO ND
NO ND
SB6 S87
1·1.5' 0.5-1'
(malkol (mo/kg)
NO NO
5$.7 46.1
80 54.8
21.8 41.9
12.1 10.6
12.5 11
NO ND
1.5 1,1
262 291
NO ND
0.32 0.33
1.:l 0.87
NO NO
5.3 5.2
NO ND
8.4 7:4
28,400 ~.eoo
Soil Sar
SlngerFu1
Lenoir, I
Tii&H J4
SB7 SBl
2-'I' 0.5-
lug/kal (®ii<
NO 48C
NO NO
ND NO
ND NO
NO 12
ND ND
ND NO
NO ND
ND ND
No ND
ND ND
NO NO
ND ND
ND ND
NO ND
NIJ NLJ
NO NO
NO ND
ND 970
NO 3.9
NO NO
22 NO
S87 sse
2·4' 0.5-1'
(mo/lto\ lma/kol
NO NO
100 74
57.2 68
23.1 19.4
10.6 10.0
11.8 15.2
t-10 ND
1.1 1.4
~9 275
NO 0.5
03 1.2
1.1 1,2
Nu NO
5.3 7.8
ND NO
6.9 9.6
25.000 28.500
PRGs::: EPA Region 9 Preliminary Remedial Goals, except tnalllum. ~pper, and Dls(2-ethyll1exyl)phtnalate ~I to GWwhleh are EPA ReglOn 3; Pnenaolllrene l
Bold indicates exceeds 2 Umes mean background and industrial or soil to 'ifN PRG.
VOCs • VQleOle Organic Compounds; SVOCa "' Semi.Volatile Organic Compound•
NO ~ Not Oelected: detection limit not available
NA = Not Available
NS· Not Specified
GW,. Ground water
• • Analyte was lound in lab method blank and was tess 1han 10 times the teported re'ult 01 the reported result was less than 3 t1mes the EQL (note from previOLtS
Ace1or.e@ 30 ug/1<9 (SB-2 to SB-5) ;md@ 11 uglKg (BG·1SP from 0.5-1'),
Bis(2-etnylhexyl)p111halale@ 19 ug!l<g (BG·1SP from 4-4.S')
Traca methylene chlOfl<!e detettion$ unreli;lble due to deUon in laboratory blank.
Soil samples MHB3 end MH84 OOll~ed In April 19Q8 by DIJ!lleS & Meote
... -· ·------·
r
r ble 1
piing Resulls
1iture Company
orth Carolina ~No. BHG..01
SB8 SB8(Dup) . 2-4' 2-4'
I (ug/kg) lunllcn)
I 410 400
I
NO NO
ND NO
ND NO
I ND NO
ND ND
NO ND
NO NO
NO ND NO ND
NO ND NO NO
ND NO
NO ND NO ND
ND NO NO ND
NO NO
410 ~00
NO " NO NO
ND ND
sea 588 (Cup)
2-'f 2-4'
(mg/kQ) (mg/kg)
NO ND
46.1 47,9
66.1 64.8
8.4 7.5
10 104
18.fl 22 NO ND
1.5 1.5
190 191
0.44 NO
0.39 NO
0.94 1.2
ND NO
7.3 S.8 ND NO
77 7,4
I 27.200 27,100
// (J
MHB3 MHB4 BG·1WT
2·3.S' 2-4. 0.5-1'
(ug/kg) (ua/l\al (UCl/kg)
2,100 NA 1.300
NA <12 ND
NA ·'12 ND
NA < 11.8 NO
NA NA 15,000
NA < 11.8 NO
<640 <630 NO
<640 <630 ND
< 6<10 <630 ND
<&40 < 630 NU
<640 < 630 ND
< 640 <630 ND
<640 <630 NO
< 640 < 630 ND
< 640 <630 NO
< 640 <630 NU
< 640 <630 ND
<640 <630 ND
<640 <630 460
NA NA NO NA NA ND
NA NA NO
MH83 MHB4 BG·1Wi
2.3,5• 2·4' 0.5-1'
(lllQ/l<Ql (mg/kg) lmt!il<nl
NA NA 0,$3
NA NA 4S
NA NA 57.9
NA NA 29.6 NA NA 11.7
NA NA 22.~
NA NA 1.3
NA NA 0.69
NA NA 163
NA NA o.s•
NA NA 0.37
NA NA 1.2
NA NA NO
NA NA 14.2
NA NA NO
NA NA 5.8
NA NA 22,800
vels are base<! on OENR UST Section Guidance
d3te summary by othen:)
BG-1WT BG·1SP
4-4.:r O.S·l'
lua/ko\ (ug/kg)
840 670
NO NO
NO ND
NO NO
ND NA
ND NO
ND ND
380 ND
NO NO
380 NO
380 NO
380 NO
380 NO
380 ND
360 NO
360 NO
300 NO
NO NO
380 440
NO NO
ND NO
NO NO
BG-1WT BG·1SP
4-4.5· 0.5·1'
(maikal (mg/k!I)
0.66 O.G6
~3.9 39.2
66.8 51.6
23.5 ~3.5
9.9 9 .. 3
10.7 15.7
!.:? 1.1
0.71 0.96
144 133
0.50 0.67
0.4 o.~
1.2 1
NO ND
G.6 8.8
ND NO
6.8 5.8
20,800 19.300
l
BG·1SP lndusltlal Rasldenlial SoilloGW
4-4.s· PRG PRG PRG
luo/l<g) (ug/kg\ cuo/kal (ugtkg)
400 100.000 9,200 22.31*1
ND 6.100 2.800 so
ND 120 54 60
NO 1,500 670 30
NO 6.200.000 1,600,000 20,000
NO 520,000 520,000 Hl.000
NO 100.000.000 12,000,000 900,000
NO 12,264,000 469,000 60.000
NA 86,000.000 6,100,000 2.000.000
380 290 62 8,000
NO 290,000 62.000 200,000
ND 29,000 6.200 50,000
380 30,000,000 2,300,000 4.000.000
ND 2.900 620 S.Ooo
NO 2.900 620 10,000
380 54,000,000 2,300.000 4,000,000
NO 390.000,000 22,000,000 10.000,000
NO 10,000.000 1.200.000 10.000,000
NA 180,000 35.000 2,900
NO 17,000 2.400 20.000 NO 150 29 1?.000
NO 12.000 690 NS
BG-1SP Mean 2XM9an lndustlial Residential SolltoGW
4·4.S' Background Baell ground PRG PRG PRG
(mg/kg) ValUe Value (mall<g) CmQ/kol (mg/kg)
0.77 o.6$$ 1.31 10,000 390 5
43.5 42.9 65.8 100,000 23,000 10.000
64.1 80.1 120.2 14.000 550 6.000
23.9 25.125 50.2$ 78.000 2.900 1,400
10.7 1D.• 20.8 100,000 4,700 NS
63 14.225 28.45 100,000 100,000 NS
t.2 ... .:; ... OiO Si 0
0.76 0.8275 1.655 2,200 150 63
147 146.7:> 293.5 100,000 5,400 1.600
0.44 0.685 1.37 2.7 0.39 29
0.35 0.37 0.74 820 31 s
0.92 1.08 2.16 100.000 47.000 NS
ND NO NA 140 M 3.6
5 a.GS 17.3 41,000 1,600 100
NO NO NA 610 23 NS
5.5 5.925 11.85 1,000 400 NS
21.600 21,125 42,250 100,000 23.000 NS
DRAFT
•
9WT
Sample 10 9WT 9WT(Oup) (MHMW·2J 1owr 10WT(Oup)
Sample Date Oct-es Feb-96 May-96 May-96 Apr-98 Ocl-95 Fob-96 May·96 Ocl·95
~
F"omialdthyde (Melhod 8315) NO NO 110 70 < 100 NO NO ND ND
!.!QC• (EPA 8240)
T richlotoelllene 6 NO ND NO < 2.0 6 NO ND NO
Me1t1yl8(1e Chloride 14 6 NO s "2.0 14 6 5 6
AGelQ(IO 10 NO ND ND NA ND ND ND NO
ci•• 1.2·0lchloroeU\ene NO NO ND ND < 2.0 ND ND ND 5
'T ctrechloroo1hena 5 NO NO NO <20 ND ND NO NO
Toluene ND ND NO NO <2.0 NO NO ND ND
SllOC~ m~e a22m
Buty~nzytph~late NO NO NO ND < 15 10 NO NO 10
Oi-n·BU!ylphll\~lale' NA NO NO ND < 15 10 ND NA NA
DiethYfph!h~late• NA NO 10 NO < 15 10 NO NA NA
e;$ (4-ethythexy1) pbll\aJaw NA 10 10 10 < 1~ 10 ND NA NA
etillci!!~C EU CA~11 ll()
End1ln aldehyde NO NO ND NO NA ND 0.05 ND NO
4,4-00T NO NO NO NO NA ND 0.05 NO ND
atpha-BHC NO NO NO NO NA NO ND ND ND
Atoclot 1260 NO NO NO ND NA NO NO ND NO
Omallll:fe~lis;.'l!e• (~
Oimelhootc NO NO ND NO NA 0.2S ND NO ND
9WT
S;mp1010 9WT 9WT (Oup) (MMMW·2) 10WT 10WT(OupJ
5.>mple Dalo 0Cl·95 Feb-II& MOy·96 May-% Apr-98 Oct·95 Fet>-96 May-96 CKl·95
~ Uoo~lo •D• o.-D>
Selan lo.Im 45.t NO ND NO < 10.0 20.3 3.9 NO 22.&
Zinc 218 118 48.7 66.4 NA 5-4.7 130 35.6 97.4
Vanadium 325 78.2 49.2 72 NA 53.8 80.2 27.7 102
Copper n.e 24.9 15.9 19.1 NA 31.4 42 17 54
Cobalt S6.2 13.S 14 1f>.7 NA 11.2 17.3 5.6 23.2
Cl\rolllium 89.3 27.9 16.3 W.8 8.75 6.7 15.:l NO 1!1.8
Cadmium e.1 10.2 ND NO <5.0 1,5 2 ND 3.1
Beryllium 8.8 2.1 1.1$ 2.1 NA 1.1 1.e 0.62 2.1
Batlum 2750 649 1130 1100 272 342 493 329 507
11/s&~ic NO NO NO ND NA NO NO ND NO
AnUmony 21.6 NO NO NO NA NO NO NO ~5
ThUrum 96.9 NO NO t-!C NA NO NO NO ND
$!~ NO NO NO NO < 5.0 NO 24.7 NO NO
Nrci<al 63.5 18.6 10.1 14.2 NA 5.7 7.6 ND 10.7
Me"uty (by CVM) NO 0.05 NO ND < 0.2 NO 0.05 NO NO
Le.;d 106 23.4 NO 18.4 < 10.0 16,9 16,3 ND 30
Iron 118,000 26,600 18,300 28,400 NA 21,700 29,800 10.900 39,300
Notes:
EPA analyllcal mell\od follows p81:imeter or pern.metor group in parenlheaes.
'The ronawing April 1990 analytical melllQ<b d~!er from those specified in i;,~: voe. aMlyzlld by EPA eo101eo20; mel8Js by EPA eo1on470.
8cld indicates oxceod' 2 times mean b:1ck9round Ond the standard.
VOCs • Volat.111 0.-ganlG Compounds
SVOCs = Sam~Volatife Organic Compounds
NO = Not Detected: detection Yim" not ava~able
NA " Not Avaijabte
NS • Not S!leeflied
10WT
(MHMW-3)
Apt-98 Nov/Dec-gs
< 100 NO
< 2.0 NO
< 2.0 &
NA NO
< 2.0 NO • ~.o ND
<2.0 ND
< 15 NO
< 15 NA
< 1~ ND
< 15 NA
AA NO
NA NO
NA NO
NA NO
NA NO
10WY
(MHMW-.3)
As>r-98 Nov/Oco-95
< 10.0 ND
NA 70
NA 83.9
NA 54.6
NA 17.3
< 5.0 32.6
< s.o NO
NA 2.3
128 2.'.)8
< 20.0 5.5
;~ JS
NA NO
< 5.0 NO
NA 26.3
<02 0.28
< 10.0 17.8
NA 31,700
Ta
Ground Wate1
Singer Furn
Lenoir, N1
TH&H Jot
BG·1WT
Fet>-;a Ma
NO ~
NO " ND "' ND f\
NO N
NO N
NO :
NO N
NO N
NO N
NO N
ND N
NO N
NO N
ND N
NO N
BG·1WT
Fcb-98 May
NO N'
26.S 2&
24.4 31
14.8 22
4,6 7
12.6 16
ND NI
0.62 O.t
75.3 10
NO NI
NO NI
NO NI
NO NI
G.8 s.:
0.09 NI
6 NI
8.270 11,4
• • Melyta was round in lab method btanl\ tor lhe following compounds and wa5 loss Chan 10 limes lhe reported te$Uh or Cha reported result wa• ICS6 lhan 3 Ume• lhe EQL (r\ole !tom provlou& d:
O~n-outylphthlllate@ 1.2 ugll (Oct. 9S) and@1.Z ugll. (Dec. 95). •
Diethytphlhruate @0.9 ug/L (Oct. 85) and@ i.9 ugJL (May 98)
8is(2-e1hylhexyt)phU\nlate@ 1.2 ug/L (Oct. OS); @ 9.~ ug/L (Dec. 95) and @ 0,63 "¢ (May 90).
" Coruntra~on ~en io NCAC 2L Ground Waler SU>ndard unless olherwl$C speclfied ea rouows:
(a)· MCLGtprc>p<»ed MCLG
fb) • tnlertm standMl or Interim Maximum Allowablo Concontr;i.tion (IMAC)
(c) • EPA Re11ion 9 Preliminary Remedial Goals (PRG~) for Tap Water
Fae:Oata,GW Dal.5
Oate:GJ18JOO
le 2
Analytical Oat.a
ure Company
th Carolina
'lo. BHG..01
BG·1Wl' (Oup)
26 NovlOee-95
) . NO
I NO
) NO
I NO
) ND
I ND
NO
) 10
) NO
ND
' NA
l ND
) ND
) ND
I ND
) ND
BG·1WT (Oup)
·98 Nov/Oec:r95
) NO
9 47.S
5 12.8
9 81
2.8
4 0.7
) ND
6 O.S8
l 397
) ND
~ 3,8
NO
l NO
NO
NO
SA 4,7SO
BG·1WT (Du1>l
Fel>-96
ND
NO
NO
ND
ND
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
o.os
NO
NO
0.6
NO
8(MWT t0uo)
Fet>-96
ND
2J 1
25.8
16 s.e
13.6
0.32
o.65
79
NO
NO
NO
ND
8.4
0.09
6.4
9.710
1ta summery by others).
BG-'IWf
(MHMW-Sl
Ap<·98
< 100
<2.0
< 2.0
NA
<2 0
< 2.0
<2.0
< 16
< 16
< 16
< 16
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
BG·1WT
(MHMW•li)
N>t·98
< 10.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
< 5.0
< S.O
NA
28.5
<20.0
NA
NA
< s.o
NA
<0.2
< 10.0
NA
BG·1SP
Nov/Ot:e-95 Feb-98 May-96
NO ND NO
NO ND NO s NO NO
NO NO ND
NO ND ND
ND NO NO
NO ND NO
10 ND NO
NA ND NO
10 NO NA
NA NO NA
NO ND NO
ND ND ND
NO NO 0.025
NO NO NO
NO ND ND
BG·1SP
Nov/Deo-95 Fel>-96 May-96
NO NO NO
16.4 20.1 29 6
7.7 7.1 8.6
5.3 6.S 15
l.1 1.2 NO
14.9 15A 12.2
NO ND 2.2
0.41 ND NO
43.5 39.7 43.9
NO NO NO
5 ND NL>
NO NO NO
ND NO NO
11.4 12.3 7
NO 0.06 ND
2.8 NO ND
2.e10 2,700 2.160
l l
BG-'ISP Ground
BG·1SP (Ovp) BG-1SP (0\IP) (MHMW-4) water Standard"
Nov-9S Fel>-98 Apr-98 {l'tJll)
ND ND ~ 100 6,SOO (c)
NO NO < 2.0 2.8
NO ND < 2.0 5
NO NO NA 700
ND ND < 2.0 70
NO ND < 2.0 0.7
NO NO < 2.0 1,000
NA NO NO 100
NA NO ND 700
NA ND NO 5,000
NA 10 ND 3
NA NO NA NS
NA NO NA 0.1 (b)
NA ND NA 0.019
NA NO NA 0.034 (e)
NA NO NA 7.3(C)
EIG·1SP Mean 2X Mean Ground
BG-1SP (Cup) BG·1SP (Oup) (MHMW-4) Background Bec~ground W~ter Standard•
NoY-95 Fcl>-9e Apr-98 Va.Ive Value (µgll)
NO NO < 10.0 ND NA so
25.1 15.3 NA 29.9G 59,92 2.100
7.1 9.4 NA 21.93 43.86 260 (c)
04 8.7 NA 15.83 31.66 1,000
1.4 2.2 NA 02 9,84 2,200(C)
12.7 28.6 < s.o 13.81 27.82 50
NO 0.29 < 5.0 0.56 1.12 s
0.4 NO NA 0.77 I.SS 4 (3)
38.9 45.J 44.1 &II.OB 136.16 2.000
ND NO < 20.0 1.83 3,67 50
1.1 ND r:,; 4. l!l e.2(1 ' ~(a)
ND NO NA NO NA 0.5 (;i)
NO ND < s.o NO NA 18
12.7 15.8 NA 12.17 24.33 100
ND 0.09 <02 0.08 0.17 1, 1
2.8 NO < 10.0 5.15 10.30 15
2.500 2,900 NA 7936 15a72 300
DRAFT
·----. ..
r SEP-18-2000 16' 30 FROM' T0:19197153605-4259
L. V. Soil Data
A. 16 soiJ samples, 4 background samples, 1 duplicate
B. FormaJdehyue primary constituent of concern
C. No fonnaldehyde, voes, pesticides/herbicides> or PCBs above industrial or
soi.I to ground water preliminary remedial goals (PRGs)
D. Se. As, and Tl detected above background and PRGs but in immediate vicinity
ofSWMUNo. 3
E. B~nzo(a)pyrene detected in two background .sai;nples At detection limit, but
above industrial PRG
Soil Action: Resample to confom presence or absence ofbenzo(a)pyrenc, Sc,
As, and Tl using Level 3 QA/QC and appropriate blanks
YI. Ground Water Data
A. 2 downgradient monitoring wells, 2 background wells, duplicates (4 eveots)
B. No det~tions above standards most recent event (1998)
C. Tnconsistcnt trace pesticide/PCB detections
D. Metals detected above background and standards, particularly in initial events
(Metal detections potentially related to poorly developed (silty) wells)
Ground Water Action: Resample wells to conflrrn the presence or absence of full
list of compounds (VOCs, SVOCs, Pesticides, PCBs, 16 Metals previously
sampled) using low flow techniques and Level III QAJQC. Conduct total and
filtered metal analyses.
Vll. S.urface Water Data
A. :Par.ti ally piped tributary to Lower Creek (Class C)
l3. Salnpling indicated on piped tributary (SW-6), but data not located
2
P.003"008
=earrra
TURNER 11.1.RT & HICKMAN,. PC
,
I