SW_F_8103-MSWLF-1974_06-22-2015_RM_GW.pdf

RUTHERFORD COUNTY
CENTRAL SANITARY LANDFILL

APPENDIX I DETECTION MONITORING
APPENDIX II ASSESSMENT MONITORING
APPENDIX II TRIGGERED CONSTITUENTS
MNA PARAMETERS
C & D PARAMETERS

APRIL/MAY 2015
SAMPLING

PREPARED FOR
RUTHERFORD COUNTY
SGC PROJECT NUMBERS 0001.001 AND 0001.006

JUNE 22, 2015

SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.
500 Hepowil Trace 919-477-9519
Hillsborough, NC www.scarlettgeophysics.com

RUTHERFORD COUNTY CENTRAL SANITARY LANDFILL
APPENDIX I DETECTION MONITORING
APPENDIX II ASSESSMENT MONITORING
APPENDIX II TRIGGERED CONSTITUENTS
MNA PARAMETERS
C & D PARAMETERS APRIL/MAY 2015 SAMPLING

I hereby certify this 22nd day of June, 2015, that this report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision.

Principal Geologist/Geophysicist
E. W. Scarlett, Jr., P.G.

Review performed by:

Reviewer
C. W. Scarlett

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
2.0 INTRODUCTION 4
3.0 SCOPE OF WORK 5
4.0 METHODS EMPLOYED 6
4.1 Monitoring Well Sampling 6 4.2 Stream Sampling 7 4.3 MNA Sampling 8
5.0 RESULTS 8
5.1 Groundwater 8
5.1.1 Analytical Results 8 5.1.2 Hydraulic Conductivity 12
5.1.3 Groundwater Flow Direction and Rate 13 5.2 Surface Water 13 5.3 Monitored Natural Attenuation 15
5.4 C & D Monitoring 15 5.5 Notifications 16 5.6 Quality Assurance 17
6.0 REFERENCES 18

TABLES

Table 1 Summary of Monitoring Well Data, Central Sanitary Landfill

Table 2 Ground and Surface Water Sampling Field Data, Central Sanitary Landfill, April
27-May 2, 2015

Table 3 Groundwater Sampling Results, Appendix I Inorganic Constituents by SW-846
Method 6010, Central Sanitary Landfill, April 27-May 2, 2015

Table 4 Groundwater Sampling Results, Appendix I Volatile Organic Constituents by SW-
846 Method 8260, Central Sanitary Landfill, April 27-May 2, 2015

Table 5 Groundwater Sampling Results, Appendix II Triggered Constituents, Central
Sanitary Landfill, April 27-May 2, 2015

Table 6 Groundwater Sampling Results, Appendix II Inorganic Constituents, Central
Sanitary Landfill, April 27-May 2, 2015

Table 7 Groundwater Sampling Results, Appendix II Volatile Organic Constituents by SW-
846 Method 8260, Central Sanitary Landfill, April 27-May 2, 2015

Table 8 Groundwater Sampling Results, Appendix II Semi-Volatile Organic Constituents by
SW-846 Method 8270, Central Sanitary Landfill, April 27-May 2, 2015

Table 9 Groundwater Sampling Results, Appendix II Organophosphorus Pesticides by SW-
846 Method 8270, Appendix II Herbicides by SW-846 Methods 8151 and
8270, Central Sanitary Landfill, April 27-May 2, 2015

Table 10 Groundwater Sampling Results, Appendix II Pesticides/PCBs by SW-846 Method
8081/8082, Central Sanitary Landfill, April 27-May 2, 2015

Table 11 Groundwater Sampling Results, Monitored Natural Attenuation Parameters, Central
Sanitary Landfill, April 27-May 2, 2015

Table 12 Groundwater Sampling Results, C&D Parameters, Central Sanitary Landfill, April
27-May 2, 2015

Table 13 Summary of Sampling Events, Central Sanitary Landfill

Table 14 Groundwater Flow Rates, Central Sanitary Landfill, April 27-May 2, 2015

Table 15 Surface Water Sampling Results, Appendix I Inorganic Constituents by SW-846
Method 6010, Central Sanitary Landfill, April 27-May 2, 2015

Table 16 Surface Water Sampling Results, Appendix I Volatile Organic Constituents by SW-
846 Method 8260, Central Sanitary Landfill, April 27-May 2, 2015

Table 17 Notification Table, Constituents Detected At or Above Groundwater Standards,
Central Sanitary Landfill, April 27-May 2, 2015

Table 18 Notification Table, Constituents Detected At or Above Surface Water Standards,
Central Sanitary Landfill, April 27-May 2, 2015

FIGURES

Figure 1 Site Location Map

Figure 2 Groundwater Contour Map, April 27-May 2, 2015

APPENDICES

Appendix A Ground and Surface Water Sampling Field Data Sheets

Appendix B Laboratory Reports

RUTHERFORD COUNTY CENTRAL SANITARY LANDFILL
APPENDIX I DETECTION MONITORING
APPENDIX II ASSESSMENT MONITORING
APPENDIX II TRIGGERED CONSTITUENTS
MNA PARAMETERS
C & D PARAMETERS
APRIL/MAY 2015 SAMPLING

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Sixteen monitoring wells and four stream locations at the Rutherford County Central Sanitary
Landfill were sampled April 27-May 2, 2015. Six of the wells (8103-MW-2, 8103-MW-4, 8103-
MW-6, 8103-MW-7, 8103-MW-8, and 8103-MW-9) comprise the Subtitle D groundwater
monitoring system for the municipal solid waste disposal area of the landfill. Six monitoring wells
comprising two well nests (8103-MW-10A, 8103-MW-10B, 8103-MW-10C, 8103-MW-10D, 8103-
MW-11A, and 8103-MW-11B) were installed in August 1998 to provide additional data on the
nature and extent of the contaminant plume emanating from the disposal area. 8103-MW-10A has
an extremely slow recharge rate and is not used as a sampling location. Five monitoring wells
(8103-MW-3, 8103-MW-12, 8103-MW-13, 8103-MW-14, and 8103-MW-15) comprise the
groundwater monitoring system for the construction and demolition (C&D) and yard waste
disposal areas and the transfer station facility. 8103-MW-2 provides the upgradient groundwater
data for the closed MSW and C&D sections of the facility. All sampling was conducted in
accordance with North Carolina Solid Waste Management Guidelines.

Samples from 8103-MW-2, 8103-MW-3, 8103-MW-4, 8103-MW-6, 8103-MW-7, 8103-MW-8,
8103-MW-9, 8103-MW-10B, 8103-MW-10C, 8103-MW-10D, 8103-MW-11A, 8103-MW-11B,
8103-MW-12, 8103-MW-13, 8103-MW-14, and 8103-MW-15 were submitted to a North Carolina
certified laboratory for analysis using the Federal Appendix I list of constituents for detection
monitoring. The Appendix I detection monitoring constituent list is a subset of the Federal
Appendix II assessment monitoring constituent list. Samples from 8103-MW-4, 8103-MW-6,
8103-MW-7, 8103-MW-8, and 8103-MW-9 were analyzed for the Appendix II assessment
monitoring constituents. Samples from 8103-MW-10B, 8103-MW-10C, 8103-MW-10D, 8103-
MW-11A, and 8103-MW-11B were also analyzed for triggered Federal Appendix II assessment

Rutherford County Central Sanitary Landfill June 22, 2015 Rutherford County, NC Page 1

monitoring constituents. In this report, the term "triggered Appendix II constituent" refers to any
Appendix II constituent not included in the Appendix I list that was detected above the quantitation
limit established by the Solid Waste Section during previous sampling events. Samples from
surface water sampling locations 8103-SW-2, 8103-SW-3, 8103-SW-4, and 8103-SW-5 were
analyzed for Federal Appendix I detection monitoring constituents.

In addition to Appendix I and triggered Appendix II parameters, samples from 8103-MW-2, 8103-
MW-4, 8103-MW-6, 8103-MW-9, 8103-MW-10D, and 8103-MW-11A were analyzed for the MNA
parameters set forth in the NC Solid Waste Section CAP approval letter dated August 17, 2007.
The results of the laboratory analyses and field tests for the MNA parameters are discussed in
Section 5.3.

In addition to Appendix I and triggered Appendix II parameters, samples from 8103-MW-2, 8103-
MW-3, 8103-MW-12, 8103-MW-13, 8103-MW-14, and 8103-MW-15 were analyzed for the C&D
parameters set forth in the NC Solid Waste Section approved monitoring plan. Surface water
samples 8103-SW-2, 8103-SW-3, and 8103-SW-4 were also analyzed for the C&D parameters.
The results of the laboratory analyses for the C&D parameters are discussed in Section 5.4.

Results from the sixteen monitoring wells sampled indicate that six Appendix I inorganic
constituents (antimony in 8103-MW-4 and 8103-MW-12; chromium in 8103-MW-10C and 8103-
MW-11B; cobalt in 8103-MW-3, 8103-MW-4, 8103-MW-6, 8103-MW-7, 8103-MW-10B, 8103-
MW-10C, 8103-MW-10D, 8103-MW-11A, 8103-MW-11B, 8103-MW-12, and 8103-MW-13; lead
in 8103-MW-11B; thallium in 8103-MW-6, 8103-MW-12, and 8103-MW-13; and vanadium in
8103-MW-2, 8103-MW-3, 8103-MW-4, 8103-MW-6, 8103-MW-7, 8103-MW-8, 8103-MW-9,
8103-MW-10B, 8103-MW-10C, 8103-MW-11A, 8103-MW-11B, 8103-MW-12, 8103-MW-13,
8103-MW-14, and 8103-MW-15) were present in concentrations exceeding the 15A NCAC 2L
Standards for Class GA Groundwater (2L) or NC Groundwater Protection (NCGP) Standards. Ten
Appendix I inorganic constituents (barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead,
nickel, silver, and zinc) were detected in one or more of the monitoring well samples at
concentrations at or above the Method Detection Limits (MDLs), but below the 2L or NCGP

Rutherford County Central Sanitary Landfill June 22, 2015 Rutherford County, NC Page 2

Standards. The above totals include those constituents detected at or above the MDLs, but below
the Solid Waste Section Limits (J values).

Concentrations of six Appendix I volatile organic constituents (1,2-dichloropropane in 8103-MW-
9; 1,4-dichlorobenzene in 8103-MW-6; benzene in 8103-MW-6 and 8103-MW-10D; chlorobenzene
in 8103-MW-6; tetrachloroethene in 8103-MW-10D; and vinyl chloride in 8103-MW-4, 8103-MW-
6, 8103-MW-10D, and 8103-MW-11A) exceeded the 2L or NCGP Standards on the date the
samples were collected. Thirteen Appendix I volatile organic constituents (1,1-dichloroethane;
1,1-dichloroethene; 1,2-dichlorobenzene; 1,4-dichlorobenzene; benzene; chlorobenzene;
chloroethane; chloroform; cis-1,2-dichloroethene; tetrachloroethene; total xylenes;
trichloroethene; and trichlorofluoromethane) were detected in one or more of the monitoring well
samples at concentrations at or above the MDLs, but below the 2L or NCGP Standards. The above
totals include those constituents detected at or above the MDLs, but below the Solid Waste Section
Limits (J values).

No Appendix II triggered constituents exceeded the 2L or NCGP Standards on the dates the
samples were collected. Three Appendix II triggered constituents (1,3-dichlorobenzene;
dichlorodifluoromethane; and mercury) were detected in one or more of the monitoring well
samples at concentrations at or above the MDLs, but below the 2L Standards. The above totals
include those constituents detected at or above the MDLs, but below the Solid Waste Section
Limits (J values).

In addition to the triggered Appendix II constituents noted above, two Appendix II constituents
(acenaphthene in 8103-MW-6 and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in 8103-MW-4) were detected at
concentrations below the 2L Standards and Solid Waste Section limits.

Surface water samples were collected from creeks along the northern, western, and southern
perimeters of the landfill property.

No Appendix I inorganic constituents were detected in concentrations that exceeded the 15A
NCAC 2B Standards for Class B/C Surface Waters (2B). One Appendix I inorganic constituent

Rutherford County Central Sanitary Landfill June 22, 2015 Rutherford County, NC Page 3

(silver in 8103-SW-2, 8103-SW-3, 8103-SW-4, and 8103-SW-5A) was detected in concentrations
that exceeded the Recommended Action Levels. One Appendix I inorganic constituent (chromium)
was detected in surface water samples at concentrations at or above the Method Detection Limits
(MDLs), but below the 15A NCAC 2B Standards for Class B/C Surface Waters (2B). Four
Appendix I inorganic constituents that do not have established standards (antimony, barium,
cobalt, and vanadium) were detected in one or more of the surface water samples at concentrations
at or above the MDLs. One Appendix I inorganic constituent (zinc) was detected in all surface
water samples at concentrations below the action level. No volatile organic constituents were
detected in any of the surface water samples.

2.0 INTRODUCTION

Central Sanitary Landfill is a Solid Waste Management Facility (SWMF) located off of Business
Highway 74 at the south end of Laurel Hill Drive south of Rutherfordton in Rutherford County,
North Carolina. Figure 1 is a map showing the site location. Groundwater and surface water
sampling locations are shown on Figure 2. Scarlett Geophysical Consulting, P.C. (SGC) was
contracted by Rutherford County to conduct sampling efforts to satisfy the following groundwater
monitoring requirements:

• 2015 semi-annual C&D water quality monitoring
• 2015 semi-annual Appendix I detection monitoring
• 2015 annual Appendix II assessment monitoring
• 2015 semi-annual Appendix I detection and Appendix II (triggered constituents only)
assessment monitoring for five supplemental wells installed in 1998
• 2015 semi-annual MNA monitoring

To complete the semi-annual C&D water quality monitoring requirement, samples from 8103-MW-
2, 8103-MW-3, 8103-MW-12, 8103-MW-13, 8103-MW-14, 8103-MW-15, 8103-SW-2, 8103-SW-
3, and 8103-SW-4 were analyzed for the Appendix I constituent list and the C&D parameters set
forth in the NC Solid Waste approved monitoring plan.

Rutherford County Central Sanitary Landfill June 22, 2015 Rutherford County, NC Page 4

To complete the semi-annual Appendix I and annual Appendix II monitoring requirements,
samples from 8103-MW-2 and the four surface water sampling locations were analyzed for
Appendix I inorganics and volatile organics and samples from 8103-MW-4, 8103-MW-6, 8103-
MW-7, 8103-MW-8, and 8103-MW-9 were analyzed for the full list of Appendix II constituents.

To complete the semi-annual Appendix I and triggered Appendix II monitoring requirements for
the five assessment wells installed in August 1998, samples from 8103-MW-10B, 8103-MW-10C,
8103-MW-10D, 8103-MW-11A, and 8103-MW-11B were analyzed for the full list of Appendix I
constituents and triggered Appendix II constituents 1,3-dichlorobenzene; 1,3-dichloropropane;
dichlorodifluoromethane; 4,4'-DDD; 4,4'-DDT; alpha-BHC; beta-BHC; delta-BHC; endrin;
gamma-BHC (Lindane); and mercury.

Monitoring wells 8103-MW-6, 8103-MW-7, 8103-MW-8, and 8103-MW-9 were installed in
November 1994 and March 1995 after three of the Appendix I baseline sampling rounds had been
completed. The March 1995 sampling event was the first in which they were included.
Monitoring wells 8103-MW-10A, 8103-MW-10B, 8103-MW-10C, 8103-MW-10D, 8103-MW-
11A, and 8103-MW-11B were installed in August-September 1998 and were first included in the
September 1998 sampling event. 8103-MW-10A was installed to provide deep groundwater
samples, and 8103-MW-10D was installed to provide water level data. 8103-MW-10A has a very
low recharge rate (less than 0.03 gallons over 24 hours); therefore, 8103-MW-10D has been
designated the deep sample well. Monitoring wells 8103-MW-12 and 8103-MW-13 were installed
in June 2002 and May 2001 to monitor the C&D waste disposal area of the landfill. 8103-MW-12
and 8103-MW-13 were first sampled in June 2002. Monitoring wells 8103-MW-14 and 8103-MW-
15 were installed in February 2008 to supplement the C&D area monitoring, and were first
sampled in May 2008.

To complete the semi-annual MNA water quality monitoring requirement, samples from 8103-
MW-2, 8103-MW-4, 8103-MW-6, 8103-MW-8, 8103-MW-9, 8103-MW-10D, and 8103-MW-11A
were analyzed for the MNA parameters set forth in the NC Solid Waste Section CAP.

3.0 SCOPE OF WORK

Rutherford County Central Sanitary Landfill June 22, 2015 Rutherford County, NC Page 5

To fulfill the groundwater monitoring requirements, SGC completed the following tasks:

• Sampled sixteen monitoring wells and four surface water locations at the Central Sanitary
Landfill SWMF
• Obtained field values for pH, temperature, and conductivity at each sample location
• Obtained field values for ORP, DO, and turbidity at the MNA sample locations
• Analyzed the appropriate samples for Appendix I, Appendix II, and triggered Appendix II
constituents by a North Carolina certified laboratory using State approved methods
• Analyzed the appropriate samples for MNA parameters
• Analyzed the appropriate samples for C&D parameters
• Determined groundwater flow rates and directions at the monitoring well locations
• Prepared a report for the State

4.0 METHODS EMPLOYED

4.1 Monitoring Well Sampling

Groundwater monitoring well sampling took place on April 27- May 2, 2015. The monitoring well
locations are shown on Figure 2. A representative from SGC opened each well and measured the
static water level from the top of the PVC casing. The volume of water in the well was calculated.
These data are summarized in Table 1. The wells were purged until a minimum of three well
volumes was removed, the well was purged dry, or the indicator field parameters were stabilized
(for the wells purged using pneumatic pumps). Following purging, groundwater samples were
collected and pH, temperature, and conductivity were measured and recorded on the groundwater
sampling field data sheets. Field measurements for oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), dissolved
oxygen (DO), and turbidity were obtained from the designated MNA wells. A groundwater
sampling field data sheet for each well is included in Appendix A. Table 2 summarizes the results
of the field data.

Rutherford County Central Sanitary Landfill June 22, 2015 Rutherford County, NC Page 6

Samples from 8103-MW-3, 8103-MW-4, 8103-MW-10D, and 8103-MW-11A were collected using
the dedicated pumps installed in each well. Samples from 8103-MW-2, 8103-MW-6, 8103-MW-8,
and 8103-MW-9 were collected using a properly decontaminated pneumatic pump and dedicated
tubing. Samples from 8103-MW-7, 8103-MW-10B, 8103-MW-10C, 8103-MW-11B, 8103-MW-
12, 8103-MW-13, 8103-MW-14, and 8103-MW-15 were collected using properly decontaminated
teflon bailers. Immediately upon collection, each sample was placed in laboratory supplied sample
containers, packed on ice, and placed under chain-of-custody. The sampling technician wore new
latex gloves and used separate bailers at each of the bailed wells to minimize the possibility of
cross contamination. Additionally, new bailer cord was used for each purging/sampling event
where a pneumatic pump was not available. The surface water samples were collected by
immersing laboratory supplied containers in the water to be sampled. After collection, each
sample was packed on ice and placed under chain-of-custody. All samples were submitted to
Research & Analytical Laboratories, Inc. (R&A), a North Carolina certified laboratory, for
analysis.

4.2 Stream Sampling

Surface water sampling took place on April 27, 2015. Sample 8103-SW-2 was collected from a
tributary of Cleghorn Creek immediately upstream from the confluence. This stream flows to the
southwest along the northwest boundary and south along the west boundary of the landfill
property. Sample 8103-SW-3 was collected from Stonecutter Creek, a stream that flows to the
southwest along the southeastern toe of the landfill. Sample 8103-SW-4 was collected from the
same stream as 8103-SW-2 approximately 2,500 feet upstream on the northern boundary of the
landfill property. The original 8103-SW-5 sampling location is an intermittent stream
downgradient from the C&D landfill. This feature drains into the Cleghorn Creek tributary
upstream from the 8103-SW-2 sampling location. This location is usually dry and rarely available
for sampling; therefore, the sampling location has been moved to the Cleghorn Creek tributary 50
feet upstream from the intersection with the drainage feature. Comparison of the data collected at
the new location with the 8103-SW-2 data should reveal whether or not conditions upgradient from
the drainage feature are impacting surface water quality. The new location is designated 8103-SW-
5A and is shown on Figure 2. Immediately upon collection, pH, temperature, and conductivity

Rutherford County Central Sanitary Landfill June 22, 2015 Rutherford County, NC Page 7

were measured and recorded on the surface water sampling field data sheets. A surface water
sampling field data sheet for each location is included in Appendix A and the field data are
summarized in Table 2. All stream samples were analyzed for the same Appendix I and C&D
parameters as the groundwater samples. The stream sample locations are shown on Figure 2.

4.3 MNA Sampling

The October 2007 event was the first to include a comprehensive set of baseline MNA
parameters. Subsequent MNA sampling has occurred on a semi-annual basis to evaluate the
effectiveness of MNA as a groundwater protection strategy. The MNA performance wells are
8103-MW-2, 8103-MW-4, 8103-MW-6, 8103-MW-8, 8103-MW-9, 8103-MW-10D, and 8103-
MW-11A. A Corrective Action Evaluation Report (CAER) discussing the first thirteen MNA
sampling events was submitted on April 1, 2014.

8103-MW-4, 8103-MW-10D, and 8103-MW-11A have dedicated bladder pumps, and were
purged and sampled in general accordance with the EPA guidelines for low-flow groundwater
sampling. Low-flow sampling was accomplished in 8103-MW-2, 8103-MW-6, and 8103-MW-9
using a properly decontaminated portable pneumatic pump and dedicated tubing.

5.0 RESULTS

5.1 Groundwater

5.1.1 Analytical Results

The results of the laboratory analyses for Appendix I constituents in the groundwater monitoring
wells are summarized in Tables 3 and 4. Table 5 summarizes the results of the laboratory analyses
for triggered Appendix II constituents. Tables 6 through 10 summarize the results of the
laboratory analyses for all Appendix II constituents in 8103-MW-4, 8103-MW-6, 8103-MW-7,
8103-MW-8, and 8103-MW-9, including the subset of Appendix I inorganics and volatile organics

Rutherford County Central Sanitary Landfill June 22, 2015 Rutherford County, NC Page 8

presented in Tables 3 and 4 and triggered Appendix II constituents presented in Table 5. Table 11
summarizes the results of the laboratory analyses for MNA parameters 8103-MW-2, 8103-MW-4,
8103-MW-6, 8103-MW-8, 8103-MW-9, 8103-MW-10D, and 8103-MW-11A. Table 12
summarizes the results for the additional C&D parameters required by the current C&D monitoring
plan. Complete laboratory reports for all Appendix I, Appendix II, MNA, and C&D analytical
testing are included in Appendix B.

The groundwater sample analyses revealed that twelve Appendix I constituents had concentrations
above 2L or NCGP Standards in one or more of the wells. A summary of these analytical results is
provided below.

• Antimony was detected in 8103-MW-4 at 1.2 ppb and 8103-MW-12 ppb. The 2L Standard
is 1.0 ppb. All results below 6.0 are estimated (J) values.

• Chromium was detected in 8103-MW-10C at 56.6 ppb, and 8103-MW-11B at 67.0 ppb.
The 2L Standard is 10.0 ppb.

• Cobalt was detected in 8103-MW-3 at 1.3 ppb, 8103-MW-4 at 2.4 ppb, 8103-MW-6 at 36.9
ppb, 8103-MW-7 at 2.8 ppb, 8103-MW-10B at 3.0 ppb, 8103-MW-10C at 35.7 ppb, 8103-
MW-10D at 28.4 ppb, 8103-MW-11A at 17.7 ppb, 8103-MW-11B at 33.1 ppb, 8103-MW-
12 at 8.6 ppb, and 8103-MW-13 at 3.3 ppb. The NCGP Standard is 1.0 ppb. All results
below 10.0 ppb are estimated (J) values.

• Lead was detected in 8103-MW- 11B at 19.4 ppb. The 2L Standard is 15.0 ppb.

• Thallium was detected in 8103-MW-6 at 9.6 ppb, 8103-MW-12 at 5.6 ppb, and 8103-MW-
13 at 5.6 ppb. The NCGP Standard is 0.28 ppb. All results below 5.5 ppb are estimated (J)
values.

Rutherford County Central Sanitary Landfill June 22, 2015 Rutherford County, NC Page 9

• Vanadium was detected in 8103-MW-2 at 1.4 ppb, 8103-MW-3 at 3.8 ppb, 8103-MW-4 at
11.8 ppb, 8103-MW-6 at 1.9 ppb, 8103-MW-7 at 5.2 ppb, 8103-MW-8 at 0.6 ppb, 8103-
MW-9 at 0.5 ppb, 8103-MW-10B at 8.0 ppb, 8103-MW-10C at 108.0 ppb, 8103-MW-11A
at 6.4 ppb, 8103-MW-11B at 135.0 ppb, 8103-MW-12 at 2.6 ppb, 8103-MW-13 at 3.4 ppb,
8103-MW-14 at 1.7 ppb, and 8103-MW-15 at 3.0 ppb. The NCGP Standard is 0.3 ppb. All
results below 25.0 ppb are estimated (J) values.

• 1,2-Dichloropropane was detected in 8103-MW-9 at 12.0 ppb. The 2L Standard is 0.6 ppb.

• 1,4-Dichlorobenzene was detected in 8103-MW-6 at 10.4 ppb. The 2L Standard is 6.0 ppb.

• Benzene was detected in 8103-MW-6 at 1.6 ppb and 8103-MW-10D at 1.7 ppb. The 2L
Standard is 1.0 ppb.

• Chlorobenzene was detected in 8103-MW-6 at 60.8 ppb. The 2L Standard is 50.0 ppb.

• Tetrachloroethene was detected in 8103-MW-10D at 1.9 ppb. The 2L Standard is 0.7 ppb.
All results below 1.0 ppb are estimated (J) values.

• Vinyl Chloride was detected in 8103-MW-4 at 0.5 ppb, 8103-MW-6 at 0.8 ppb, 8103-MW-
10D at 0.4 ppb, and 8103-MW-11A at 0.6 ppb. The 2L Standard is 0.03 ppb. All results
below 1.0 ppb are estimated (J) values.

The following Appendix I constituents were detected in one or more of the wells in concentrations
above the MDLs and below established 2L or NCGP Standards. Values that are above the MDLs
and below the SWSLs (estimated “J” values) are included.

• Barium
• Beryllium
• Cadmium

Rutherford County Central Sanitary Landfill June 22, 2015 Rutherford County, NC Page 10

• Chromium
• Cobalt
• Copper
• Lead
• Nickel
• Silver
• Zinc
• 1,1-Dichloroethane
• 1,1-Dichloroethene
• 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
• 1,2-Dichloropropane
• 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
• Benzene
• Chlorobenzene
• Chloroethane
• Chloroform
• Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
• Tetrachloroethene
• Total Xylenes
• Trichloroethene
• Trichlorofluoromethane

The groundwater sample analyses did not reveal any Appendix II triggered constituent
concentrations above the 2L or NCGP Standards.

The following Appendix II triggered constituents were detected in one or more of the wells in
concentrations above the MDLs and below established 2L Standards. Values that are above the
MDLs and below the SWSLs (estimated “J” values) are included.

• 1,3-Dichlorobenzene

Rutherford County Central Sanitary Landfill June 22, 2015 Rutherford County, NC Page 11

• Dichlorodifluoromethane
• Mercury

The following Appendix II constituents that are not included in the triggered Appendix II data set
were detected at concentrations above the MDLs and below established 2L Standards. They were
detected at low concentrations below the SWSLs (estimated “J” values) and will be monitored
annually. They will not be added to the triggered Appendix II list at this time.

• Acenaphthene was detected in 8103-MW-6.

• Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate was detected in 8103-MW-4.

The results of the laboratory analyses for MNA parameters are presented in Table 11 and discussed
in Section 5.3.

The results of the laboratory analyses for C&D parameters are presented in Table 12 and discussed
in Section 5.4.

Table 13 summarizes the sampling history for the wells in the groundwater monitoring plan and
includes the C&D and MNA wells.

5.1.2 Hydraulic Conductivity

In-situ hydraulic conductivity tests were performed on wells 8103-MW-2, 8103-MW-4, 8103-MW-
6, 8103-MW-7, 8103-MW-8 and 8103-MW-9 on March 20, 1995. These tests resulted in hydraulic
conductivity values ranging from 2.9 x 10-6 to 1.6 x 10-4 cm/sec. These data are included in Table
14 and were used to calculate groundwater flow velocities across the site. A complete discussion
of the test methods and calculations is presented in BPA Environmental & Engineering’s July 7,
1995, report "Monitoring Well System Upgrade, Central Sanitary Landfill, Rutherford County,
North Carolina."

Rutherford County Central Sanitary Landfill June 22, 2015 Rutherford County, NC Page 12

5.1.3 Groundwater Flow Direction and Rate

The static levels in the monitoring wells were measured April 27-May 2, 2015. The water table
elevations ranged from 804.12 to 953.33 feet MSL on these dates. Groundwater and well casing
elevation data are included in Table 1. A groundwater contour map was constructed and is
presented as Figure 2. Based on field data, groundwater appears to be flowing in a radial pattern
from the fill area towards the east, south, and west. Groundwater flow lines were drawn through
each well as shown on Figure 2. The groundwater gradient at each well was calculated assuming a
constant groundwater gradient along the flow line between adjacent groundwater elevation
contours, between two monitoring wells along the same flow path, or between a well and the
nearest stream.

Based on a variation of Darcy's Law, the rate of groundwater movement within the regolith aquifer
was calculated at each monitoring well using the following equation:

V = Ki
n

where V = velocity (ft/day)
K = hydraulic conductivity (ft/day)
i = groundwater gradient (ft/ft)
n = porosity (dimensionless)

Calculated hydraulic conductivity and gradient values and estimated effective porosity values for
each well were used in the velocity calculations. The 20 percent effective porosity value is based
on porosity and specific yield versus grain size distribution relationships presented in Fetter (1988)
and is typical for the type of soil (sandy silt with some clays) comprising the regolith at the
landfill. The calculated groundwater velocities ranged from 0.73 to 24.26 ft/yr (average = 8.65
ft/yr) and are included in Table 14.

5.2 Surface Water

Rutherford County Central Sanitary Landfill June 22, 2015 Rutherford County, NC Page 13

No Appendix I volatile organic constituents were detected above the MDLs in any of the surface
water samples.

No Appendix I inorganic constituents were detected in concentrations at or above the 2B Standards
in any of the four surface water samples collected on April 27, 2015. One constituent (listed
below) was detected at concentrations above the Recommended Action Level.

• Silver was detected in 8103-SW-2 at 1.8 ppb, 8103-SW-3 at 2.8 ppb, 8103-SW-4 at 1.2
ppb, and 8103-SW-5A at 2.8 ppb. The Recommended Action Level is 0.06 ppb. The
results are estimated (J) values.

Appendix I inorganic constituents with established standards (listed below) were detected in one or
more of the surface water samples at concentrations above the MDL and below the 2B Standards or
Action Levels. Values that are above the MDLs and below the SWSLs (estimated “J” values) are
included.

• Chromium
• Zinc

The following Appendix I inorganic constituents were detected in one or more of the surface water
samples in concentrations above the MDL. No 2B Standards have been established for these
constituents. Values that are above the MDLs and below the SWSLs (estimated “J” values) are
included.

• Antimony
• Barium
• Cobalt
• Vanadium

The results of the laboratory analyses for C&D surface water parameters are presented in Table 12
and discussed in Section 5.4.

Rutherford County Central Sanitary Landfill June 22, 2015 Rutherford County, NC Page 14

The results of the laboratory analyses for Appendix I constituents in the surface water samples are
summarized in Tables 15 and 16, and the complete laboratory reports are included in Appendix B.

5.3 Monitored Natural Attenuation

This is the sixteenth consecutive semi-annual sampling event that included MNA parameters,
providing a sufficient set of baseline data for constructive evaluation of MNA processes. The
results are encouraging. The presence and ratios of reductive dehalogenation chlorinated ethenes
and other MNA parameter concentrations in the wells that are in the primary plume migration
routes (8103-MW-4, 8103-MW-6, and 8103-MW-11A to the west and 8103-MW-10D to the
east) are consistent with the impacts expected from biodegradation processes at work in a mixed
contaminant plume. A Corrective Action Evaluation Report (CAER) discussing the first thirteen
MNA sampling events was submitted on April 1, 2014.

Two MNA parameters (shown below) was detected at concentrations above the 2L Standard.
The results of the MNA field parameter measurements are included in Table 2, and the complete
results of the MNA laboratory parameter analyses are presented in Table 11.

• Chloride was detected in 8103-MW-6 at 278,000.0 ppb. The 2L Standard is 250,000.0 ppb.

• Iron was detected in 8103-MW-4 at 3,070.0 ppb, 8103-MW-6 at 8,530.0 ppb, 8103-MW-
10D at 375.0 ppb, and 8103-MW-11A at 7,970.0 ppb. The 2L Standard is 300.0 ppb.

5.4 C & D Monitoring

The groundwater sample analyses revealed that three C&D parameters (listed below) exceeded
established groundwater water protection standards.

Rutherford County Central Sanitary Landfill June 22, 2015 Rutherford County, NC Page 15

• Iron was detected in 8103-MW-3 at 2,060.0 ppb, 8103-MW-12 at 1,480.0 ppb, 8103-MW-
13 at 1,520.0 ppb, 8103-MW-14 at 668.0 ppb, and 8103-MW-15 at 1,380.0 ppb. The 2L
Standard is 300.0 ppb.

• Manganese was detected in 8103-MW-3 at 233.0 ppb, 8103-MW-12 at 5,150.0 ppb, and
8103-MW-13 at 672.0 ppb. The 2L Standard is 50.0 ppb.

• TDS concentration in 8103-MW-3 was 514,000 ppb. The 2L Standard is 500,000.0 ppb.

No C&D surface water constituent concentrations exceeded the 2B Standard for Class B,C Surface
Waters.

5.5 Notifications

All groundwater constituent concentrations that exceeded the 2L or NCGP standards are listed in
Section 5.1.1, Section 5.3, and Section 5.4, and indicated by shaded cells and bold typeface in
Tables 3 through 12. Surface water constituent concentrations that exceeded the 2B standards are
listed in Section 5.5 and indicated by shaded cells and bold typeface in Tables 12, 15, and 16. A
summary of groundwater notifications is provided in Table 17 and surface water notifications in
Table 18.

Groundwater and surface water concentrations that exceeded the reporting limits, but were below
the 2L or NCGP standards are listed in Sections 5.1.1 and 5.2 and in Tables 3 through 12, 15, and
16.

The volatile organic constituents present in the groundwater samples are likely due to past waste
disposal activities; however, contributions by ongoing borrow, maintenance, and transfer station
activities cannot be ruled out. Continued operation of the C&D facility adjacent to the old disposal
area is also a potential contributor. There is no evidence indicating that volatile organic
constituents resulting from waste disposal at Central Landfill currently exceed the 2L or NCGP
Standards at locations beyond the facility boundary.

Rutherford County Central Sanitary Landfill June 22, 2015 Rutherford County, NC Page 16

The inorganic constituents present in the groundwater samples have been influenced by past waste
disposal, but it is likely that local geology has an impact. The upgradient well, 8103-MW-2, shows
no volatile organic impacts but over time has shown a number of inorganic concentrations similar
to those in downgradient wells.

5.6 Quality Assurance

A duplicate sample was collected from 8103-MW-3 and submitted for analysis as "Duplicate."
This sample was analyzed for Appendix I volatile organic constituents. The duplicate Appendix I
volatile organic results are in agreement with the 8103-MW-3 results. The results of the duplicate
sample analyses are included in Appendix B.

Trip blank samples accompanied the sample bottles from the time they left the laboratory until
their return. The laboratory did not report the presence of any Appendix I constituents above the
detection in the trip blank sample.

Rutherford County Central Sanitary Landfill June 22, 2015 Rutherford County, NC Page 17

6.0 REFERENCES

BPA Environmental & Engineering, Inc., Monitoring Well System Upgrade, Central Sanitary
Landfill, Rutherford County, N.C., July 7, 1995.

Fetter, C.W., 1988, Applied Hydrogeology, New York, New York; Macmillan Publishing
Company, 1988, 592 pp.

North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources, Division of Environmental Management, Subchapter 2L, Classifications and Water
Quality Standards Applicable to the Groundwaters of North Carolina, Sections .0100, .0200, and
.0300 (Downloaded from NCSW Web Site, June 11, 2012); from the Environmental Management
Commission, Raleigh, North Carolina.

North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources, Division of Environmental Management, Subchapter 2B, Classifications and Water
Quality Standards Applicable to the Surface Waters of North Carolina, Section .0200, May 1,
2007; from the Environmental Management Commission, Raleigh, North Carolina.

Composite 15A NCAC Subchapter 2B and EPA National Criteria for Freshwater Aquatic Life,
current as of February 5, 2010.

North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources, Division of Solid Waste Management, Subchapter 13B, Solid Waste Management,
Section .1600 (August 27, 2001).

North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources, Division of Solid Waste Management, Subchapter 13B, Solid Waste Management,
recently added/updated rules .1604, .1626, .1632, .1633, .1634, .1635, and .1637 (effective
April/May 2011)

Rutherford County Central Sanitary Landfill June 22, 2015 Rutherford County, NC Page 18

North Carolina Water Quality Monitoring Guidance Document for Solid Waste Facilities,
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Division of Solid Waste Management,
Solid Waste Section, (January 2000), Download from NCSW Web Site.

North Carolina Solid Waste Section Memorandum Regarding New Guidelines for Electronic
Submittal of Environmental Data, October 27, 2006.

Addendum to October 27, 2006, North Carolina Solid Waste Section Memorandum Regarding New
Guidelines for Electronic Submittal of Environmental Data, February 23, 2007.

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Solid Waste
Management, Solid Waste Management, Solid Waste Environmental Monitoring Reporting Limits
and Standards, updated June 13, 2011, downloaded from NCDENR June 11, 2015.

Rutherford County Central Sanitary Landfill June 22, 2015 Rutherford County, NC Page 19
RuthCent_0415
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL DATA
CENTRAL SANITARY LANDFILL (# 81-03)
RUTHERFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Elevation (ft)Depth4 Static Water Levels3
Well of
No.Land Top of Top of Bottom of Well Depth2 Elevation Depth2 Elevation Depth2 Elevation Depth2 Elevation
Surface Casing1 Screen Screen (ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)
8103-MW-2 995.43 995.51 945.43 935.43 60.0 35.94 959.57 37.12 958.39 40.80 954.71 42.18 953.33
8103-MW-3 859.62 860.28 822.62 812.62 47.0 31.36 828.92 32.03 828.25 33.97 826.31 32.91 827.37
8103-MW-4 849.72 851.03 809.72 799.72 50.0 31.96 819.07 31.82 819.21 35.82 815.21 33.34 817.69
8103-MW-6 833.43 834.90 810.93 795.93 37.5 29.08 805.82 28.42 806.48 30.77 804.13 30.78 804.12
8103-MW-7 890.51 892.70 851.51 836.51 54.0 33.93 858.77 33.50 859.20 36.54 856.16 34.56 858.14
8103-MW-8 857.86 860.31 828.36 813.36 44.5 38.87 821.44 36.91 823.40 41.66 818.65 39.99 820.32
8103-MW-9 864.97 867.25 842.47 827.47 37.5 31.54 835.71 32.60 834.65 32.75 834.50 32.74 834.51
8103-MW-10A 834.73 837.23 743.73 733.73 101.0 6.425 830.815 5.845 831.395 --6.055 831.185
8103-MW-10B 834.50 836.15 802.50 797.50 37.0 8.68 827.47 7.83 828.32 9.17 826.98 8.44 827.71
8103-MW-10C 834.50 836.19 823.50 818.50 16.0 8.42 827.77 7.62 828.57 8.97 827.22 8.22 827.97
8103-MW-10D 834.73 837.23 778.73 768.73 66.0 9.55 827.68 8.51 828.72 10.21 827.02 9.32 827.91
8103-MW-11A 815.39 817.18 780.39 770.39 45.0 8.08 809.10 7.80 809.38 8.81 808.37 8.11 809.07
8103-MW-11B 816.32 817.72 806.32 796.32 20.0 9.48 808.24 9.21 808.51 10.05 807.67 9.32 808.40
8103-MW-12 884.33 886.68 849.33 834.33 50.0 37.66 849.02 33.20 853.48 40.17 846.51 31.97 854.71
8103-MW-13 960.80 962.90 887.80 872.80 88.0 74.49 888.41 76.67 886.23 78.34 884.56 80.60 882.30
8103-MW-14 867.08 869.48 849.68 834.68 32.4 19.65 849.83 19.96 849.52 22.73 846.75 21.71 847.77
8103-MW-15 887.58 889.54 839.58 849.58 38.0 29.40 860.14 29.86 859.68 33.63 855.91 30.44 859.10
Notes:
1 Elevations for 8103-MW-2 through 8103-MW-11B determined by survey: Burnt Chimney Surveying, Forest City, NC,
December 1998, elevations for 8103-MW-12 and 8103-MW-13 provided by David Garrett P.G., P.E., Engineering
and Geology, Raleigh, NC, 2002 and 1999, respectively
2 Depth to groundwater measured by Scarlett Geophysical Consulting, P.C.
3 Water levels taken from top of casing
4 Depth of well measured from land surface
5 May not represent static water level. Well has very slow recharge rate (less than 0.03 gallons per day)
Sep 23-28, 2013 Apr 27-May 2, 2015Sep 23-28, 2014Apr 28-May 1, 2014
RuthCent_0415
TABLE 2
GROUND AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
CENTRAL SANITARY LANDFILL (# 81-03)
RUTHERFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL 27 - MAY 2, 2015
Sample Location
8103-MW-2 8103-MW-3 8103-MW-4 8103-MW-6 8103-MW-7 8103-MW-8 8103-MW-9 8103-MW-10A 8103-MW-10B
Temperature 16.43ºC 15.4ºC 15.54ºC 17.75ºC 14.9ºC 15.66ºC 16.43ºC NS 14.2ºC
Conductivity 76 µmhos/cm 804 µmhos/cm 516 µmhos/cm 1400 µmhos/cm 809 µmhos/cm 270 µmhos/cm 24.0 µmhos/cm NS 123.2 µmhos/cm
pH 8.05 6.24 6.24 6.24 6.43 5.83 5.38 NS 5.94
ORP 126 mV NA 43 mV -28 mV NA 240 mV 292 mV NS NA
DO 10.12 mg/l NA 0.00 mg/l 0.00 mg/l NA 3.41 mg/l 5.36 mg/l NS NA
Turbidity 0.0 NTU NA 0.0 NTU 0.0 NTU NA 0.0 NTU 0.0 NTU NS NA
Sample Location
8103-MW-10C 8103-MW-10D 8103-MW-11A 8103-MW-11B 8103-MW-12 8103-MW-13 8103-MW-14 8103-MW-15 8103-SW-2
Temperature 12.9ºC 14.72ºC 14.99ºC 13.1ºC 15.7ºC 16.0ºC 16.0ºC 15.9ºC 15.4ºC
Conductivity 109.0 µmhos/cm 192 µmhos/cm 475 µmhos/cm 172.6 mhos/cm 603 µmhos/cm 170.3 µmhos/cm 233.0 µmhos/cm 145.8 µmhos/cm 79.3 µmhos/cm
pH 5.98 5.85 5.86 5.53 6.12 5.35 5.58 5.48 7.13
ORP NA 112 mV 11 mV NA NA NA NA NA NA
DO NA 0.00 mg/l 0.00 mg/l NA NA NA NA NA NA
Turbidity NA 0.0 NTU 20.7 NTU NA NA NA NA NA NA
Sample Location
8103-SW-3 8103-SW-4 8103-SW-5A
Temperature 16.0ºC 14.2ºC 15.4ºC
Conductivity 71.1 µmhos/cm 47.9 µmhos/cm 60.0 µmhos/cm
pH 6.57 6.27 6.82
ORP NA NA NA
DO NA NA NA
Turbidity NA NA NA
NS - Not sampled
NA - Not analyzed
Parameter
Parameter
Parameter
RuthCent_0415
TABLE 3
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RESULTS
APPENDIX I INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS BY SW-846 METHOD 6010 C
CENTRAL SANITARY LANDFILL (# 81-03)
RUTHERFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL 27 - MAY 2, 2015
15A NCAC 2L NC Groundwater Solid Waste
Parameter Standard for Class Protection Section Limit
8103-MW-2 8103-MW-3 8103-MW-4 8103-MW-6 8103-MW-7 8103-MW-8 8103-MW-9 8103-MW-10B GA Groundwater Standard (SWSL)
ANTIMONY BQL BQL 1.2 J BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *1.0 6.0
ARSENIC BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 10.0 *10.0BARIUM19.4 J 138.0 169.0 290.0 100.0 141.0 53.2 J 87.0 J 700.0 *100
BERYLLIUM BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *4.0 1.0
CADMIUM BQL BQL 0.3 J BQL 0.3 J BQL BQL BQL 2.0 *1.0
CHROMIUM 0.9 J 1.6 J 2.6 J 4.7 J 3.6 J 2.1 J 2.6 J 4.3 J 10.0 *10.0
COBALT BQL 1.3 J 2.4 J 36.9 2.8 J BQL BQL 3.0 J *1.0 10.0
COPPER BQL 4.2 J 15.1 4.0 J 6.9 J BQL BQL 2.3 J 1,000.0 *10.0LEADBQLBQL3.6 J BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 15.0 *10.0
NICKEL BQL 2.0 J 1.9 J 12.9 J 5.9 J BQL 0.7 J 2.2 J 100.0 *50.0
SELENIUM BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 20.0 *10.0
SILVER 1.9 J BQL BQL 3.6 J BQL 2.3 J 2.8J BQL 20.0 *10.0
THALLIUM BQL BQL BQL 9.6 BQL BQL BQL BQL *0.28 5.5
VANADIUM 1.4 J 3.8 J 11.8 J 1.9 J 5.2 J 0.6 J 0.5 J 8.0 J *0.3 25.0
ZINC 61.3 24.1 50.9 28.4 39.7 62.4 65.9 55.2 1,000.0 *10.0
15A NCAC 2L NC Groundwater Solid Waste
Parameter Standard for Class Protection Section Limit
8103-MW-10C 8103-MW-10D 8103-MW-11A 8103-MW-11B 8103-MW-12 8103-MW-13 8103-MW-14 8103-MW-15 GA Groundwater Standard (SWSL)
ANTIMONY BQL BQL BQL BQL 2.4 J BQL BQL BQL *1.0 6.0
ARSENIC BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 10.0 *10.0
BARIUM 589.0 156.0 180.0 546.0 172.0 131.0 95.4 J 67.7 J 700.0 *100
BERYLLIUM 1.9 BQL BQL 3.6 BQL BQL BQL BQL *4.0 1.0
CADMIUM BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.3 J BQL BQL BQL 2.0 *1.0
CHROMIUM 56.6 1.0 J 5.0 J 67.0 3.8 J BQL 0.9 J 2.6 J 10.0 *10.0
COBALT 35.7 28.4 17.7 33.1 8.6 J 3.3 J BQL 0.8 J *1.0 10.0
COPPER 47.6 BQL 9.96 J 41.4 8.4 J BQL 2.8 J 3.8 J 1,000.0 *10.0
LEAD 13.1 BQL BQL 19.4 BQL BQL BQL BQL 15.0 *10.0
NICKEL 35.3 J 5.0 J 7.7 J 50.8 4.1 J 2.2 J BQL 0.7 J 100.0 *50.0
SELENIUM BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 20.0 *10.0
SILVER BQL 2.1 J 3.7 J BQL BQL 2.4 J BQL 2.0 J 20.0 *10.0
THALLIUM BQL BQL BQL BQL 5.6 5.6 BQL BQL *0.28 5.5
VANADIUM 108.0 BQL 6.4 J 135.0 2.6 J 3.4 J 1.7 J 3.0 J *0.3 25.0ZINC170.0 59.9 32.5 172.0 41.5 32.4 27.1 33.2 1,000.0 *10.0
Notes:• All results in parts per billion (ppb)• BQL - Below Method Detection Limit
• J - Estimated results. Present but below SWSL
• NS - Not Sampled
• * - Standard not established• Shaded cells denote concentrations that equal or exceed 2L or Groundwater Protection Standards
Well Number
Well Number
RuthCent_0415
15A NCAC 2L NC Groundwater Solid Waste
Parameters Standard for Class Protection Section Limit
8103-MW-2 8103-MW-3 8103-MW-4 8103-MW-6 8103-MW-7 8103-MW-8 8103-MW-9 8103-MW-10B 8103-MW-10C 8103-MW-10D 8103-MW-11A 8103-MW-11B 8103-MW-12 8103-MW-13 8103-MW-14 8103-MW-15 GA Groundwater Standard (SWSL)
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *1.0 5.0
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 200.0 *1.0
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.2 0.18 3.0
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *0.6 1.0
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL 1.7 J BQL BQL 0.3 J BQL 2.8 J BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 6.0 *5.0
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.2 J BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 7.0 *5.0
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.005 *1.0
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.04 *13.0
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.02 *1.0
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE BQL BQL 0.1 J 0.5 J BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.1 J 0.2 J BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 20.0 *5.0
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.4 *1.0
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 12.0 BQL BQL 0.2 J BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.6 *1.0
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE BQL BQL 2.9 10.4 BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 3.1 4.4 0.3 J 0.2 J BQL BQL BQL 6.0 *1.0
2-BUTANONE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 4,000.0 *100.0
2-HEXANONE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *40.0 50.0
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *560.0 100.0
ACETONE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 6000.0 *100.0
ACRYLONITRILE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL **200.0
BENZENE BQL BQL 0.3 J 1.6 0.1 J BQL BQL BQL BQL 1.7 0.3 J BQL 0.3 J 0.6 J BQL BQL 1.0 *1.0
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *0.6 3.0
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.6 *1.0
BROMOFORM BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 4.0 *3.0
BROMOMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *10.0 10.0
CARBON DISULFIDE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 700.0 *100.0
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.3 *1.0
CHLOROBENZENE BQL BQL 4.1 60.8 0.2 J BQL BQL BQL BQL 2.7 J 7.6 0.3 J 0.2 J 0.1 J BQL BQL 50.0 *3.0
CHLOROETHANE BQL BQL 0.6 J 0.2 J BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.7 J 0.4 J BQL BQL 0.8 J BQL BQL 3,000.0 *10.0
CHLOROFORM BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.4 J BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 70.0 *5.0
CHLOROMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 3.0 *1.0
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE BQL BQL 0.2 J 0.2 J 0.1 J BQL BQL 0.5 J BQL 14.9 0.3 J BQL BQL 0.8 J 0.2 J BQL 70.0 *5.0
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.4 *1.0
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.4 0.41 3.0
DIBROMOMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *70.0 10.0
ETHYLBENZENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 600.0 *1.0
METHYL IODIDE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL **10.0
METHYLENE CHLORIDE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 5.0 *1.0
STYRENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 70.0 *1.0
TETRACHLOROETHENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.2 J 0.3 J BQL 1.9 BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.7 *1.0
TOLUENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 600.0 *1.0
TOTAL XYLENES BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.4 J BQL BQL 500.0 *5.0
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 100.0 *5.0
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.4 *1.0
TRANS-1,4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL **100.0
TRICHLOROETHENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 1.6 BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 3.0 *1.0
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 1.9 3.6 2,000.0 *1.0
VINYL ACETATE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *88.0 50.0
VINYL CHLORIDE BQL BQL 0.5 J 0.8 J BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.4 J 0.6 J BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.03 *1.0
• All results in parts per billion (ppb)
• BQL - Below Method Detection Limit
• J - Estimated result. Present but below SWSL
• B - Lab blank contamination
• NS - Not Sampled
• * - Standard not established
• Shaded cells denote concentrations that equal or exceed 2L or Groundwater Protection Standards
• For constituents that are not naturally occurring and have no established standards, the SWSLs are the Standards
Well Number
TABLE 4
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RESULTS
APPENDIX I VOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS BY SW-846 METHOD 8260
CENTRAL SANITARY LANDFILL (# 81-03)
RUTHERFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL 27 - MAY 2, 2015
RuthCent_0415
15A NCAC 2L NC Groundwater Solid Waste
SW-846 Standard for Class Protection Section Limit
Parameter Method 8103-MW-4 8103-MW-6 8103-MW-7 8103-MW-8 8103-MW-9 8103-MW-10B 8103-MW-10C 8103-MW-10D 8103-MW-11A 8103-MW-11B GA Groundwater Standard (SWSL)
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8260 0.1 J 0.6 J BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.3 J BQL 200.0 *5.0
1,3-Dichloropropane 8260 BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL **1.0
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8260 BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.3 J BQL BQL 1,000.0 *5.0
4,4'- DDD 8081 BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.1 *0.1
4,4'- DDT 8081 BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.1 *0.1
alpha-BHC 8081 BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *0.006 0.05
beta-BHC 8081 BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *0.019 0.05
delta-BHC 8081 BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *0.019 0.05
Endrin 8081 BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 2.0 *0.1
gamma-BHC (Lindane)8081 BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.03 *0.05
Mercury 7470 0.12 J BQL 0.02 J BQL 0.01 J 0.01 J BQL 0.02 J BQL 0.04 J 1.0 *0.2
Notes:
• All results in parts per billion (ppb)
• BQL - Below Method Detection Limit
• J - Estimated result. Present but below SWSL
• * - Standard not established
• Shaded cells denote concentrations that equal or exceed 2L or Groundwater Protection Standards
• For constituents that are not naturally occurring and have no established standards, the SWSLs are the Standards
• NA - Not analyzed
Well Number
RUTHERFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL 27 - MAY 2, 2015
TABLE 5
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RESULTS
APPENDIX II TRIGGERED CONSTITUENTS
CENTRAL SANITARY LANDFILL (# 81-03)
RuthCent_0415
TABLE 6
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RESULTS
APPENDIX II INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS
CENTRAL SANITARY LANDFILL (#81-03)
RUTHERFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL 27 - MAY 2, 2015
15A NCAC 2L NC Groundwater Solid Waste
Parameter Laboratory Standard for Class Protection Section Limit
Method 8103-MW-4 8103-MW-6 8103-MW-7 8103-MW-8 8103-MW-9 GA Groundwater Standard (SWSL)
ANTIMONY SW 846 6010 1.2 J BQL BQL BQL BQL *1.0 6.0
ARSENIC SW 846 6010 BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 10.0 *10.0
BARIUM SW 846 6010 169.0 290.0 100.0 141.0 53.2 J 700.0 *100.0
BERYLLIUM SW 846 6010 BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *4.0 1.0
CADMIUM SW 846 6010 0.3 J BQL 0.3 J BQL BQL 2.0 *1.0
CHROMIUM SW 846 6010 2.6 J 4.7 J 3.6 J 2.1 J 2.6 J 10.0 *10.0
COBALT SW 846 6010 2.4 J 36.9 2.8 J BQL BQL *1.0 10.0
COPPER SW 846 6010 15.1 4.0 J 6.9 J BQL BQL 1,000.0 *10.0
CYANIDE EPA 335.2 BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 70.0 *10.0
LEAD SW 846 6010 3.6 J BQL BQL BQL BQL 15.0 *10.0
MERCURY SW 846 7470 0.12 J BQL 0.02 J BQL 0.01 J 1.0 *0.2
NICKEL SW 846 6010 1.9 J 12.9 J 5.9 J BQL 0.7 J 100.0 *50.0
SELENIUM SW 846 6010 BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 20.0 *10.0
SILVER SW 846 6010 BQL 3.6 J BQL 2.3 J 2.8 J 20.0 *10.0
SULFIDE EPA 376.1 BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL **1,000.0
THALLIUM SW 846 6010 BQL 9.6 BQL BQL BQL *0.28 5.5
TIN SW 846 6010 BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *2,000.0 100.0
VANADIUM SW 846 6010 11.8 J 1.9 J 5.2 J 0.6 J 0.5 J *0.3 25.0
ZINC SW 846 6010 50.9 28.4 39.7 62.4 65.9 1,000.0 *10.0
Notes:
• All results in parts per billion (ppb)
• BQL - Below Method Detection Limit
• J - Estimated result. Present but below SWSL
• * - Standard not established
• Shaded cells denote concentrations that equal or exceed the 2L or Groundwater Protection Standards
• NS - Not Sampled
RuthCent_0415
TABLE 7
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RESULTS
APPENDIX II VOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS BY SW-846 METHOD 8260
CENTRAL SANITARY LANDFILL (#81-03)
RUTHERFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL 27 - MAY 2, 2015
15A NCAC 2L NC Groundwater Solid Waste
Parameters Standard for Class Protection Standard Section Limit
8103-MW-4 8103-MW-6 8103-MW-7 8103-MW-8 8103-MW-9 GA Groundwater (SWSL)
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *1.0 5.0
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 200.0 *1.0
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.2 0.18 3.0
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *0.6 1.0
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE BQL BQL 1.7 J BQL BQL 6.0 *5.0
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 7.0 *5.0
1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL **5.0
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.005 *1.0
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE1 BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 70.0 70.0 10
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.04 *13.0
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.02 *1.0
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 0.1 J 0.5 J BQL BQL BQL 20.0 *5.0
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.4 *1.0
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BQL BQL BQL BQL 12.0 0.6 *1.0
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 0.1 J 0.6 J BQL BQL BQL 200.0 *5.0
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL **1.0
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 2.9 10.4 BQL BQL BQL 6.0 *1.0
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL **15.0
2-BUTANONE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 4,000.0 *100.0
2-HEXANONE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *40.0 50.0
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *560.0 100.0
ACETONE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 6,000.0 *100.0
ACETONITRILE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *42.0 55.0
ACROLEIN BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *4.0 53.0
ACRYLONITRILE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL **200.0
ALLYL CHLORIDE (3-chloropropene)BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL **10.0
BENZENE 0.3 J 1.6 0.1 J BQL BQL 1.0 *1.0
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *0.6 3.0
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.6 *1.0
BROMOFORM BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 4.0 *3.0
BROMOMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *10.0 10.0
CARBON DISULFIDE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 700.0 *100.0
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.3 *1.0
CHLOROBENZENE 4.1 60.8 0.2 J BQL BQL 50.0 *3.0
CHLOROETHANE 0.6 J 0.2 J BQL BQL BQL 3,000.0 *10.0
CHLOROFORM BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.4 J 70.0 *5.0
CHLOROMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 3.0 *1.0
CHLOROPRENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL **20.0
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 0.2 J 0.2 J 0.1 J BQL BQL 70.0 *5.0
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.4 *1.0
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.4 0.41 3.0
DIBROMOMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *70.0 10.0
DICHLORODIFLOUROMETHANE BQL BQL 0.2 J BQL BQL 1,000.0 *5.0
ETHYL BENZENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 600.0 *1.0
ETHYL METHACRYLATE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL **10.0
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL **100.0
METHACRYLONITRILE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL **100.0
METHYL IODIDE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL **10.0
METHYL METHACRYLATE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *25.0 30.0
METHYLENE CHLORIDE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 5.0 *1.0
PROPIONITRILE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL **150.0
STYRENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 70.0 *1.0
TETRACHLOROETHENE BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.2 J 0.7 *1.0
TOLUENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 600.0 *1.0
TOTAL XYLENES BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 500.0 *5.0
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 100.0 *5.0
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.4 *1.0
TRANS-1,4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL **100.0
TRICHLOROETHENE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 3.0 *1.0
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 2,000.0 *1.0
VINYL ACETATE BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL *88.0 50.0
VINYL CHLORIDE 0.5 J 0.8 J BQL BQL BQL 0.03 *1.0
Notes:
• All results in parts per billion (ppb)
• BQL - Below Method Detection Limit
• J - Estimated result. Present but below reporting limit.
• * - Standard not established
• Shaded cells denote concentrations that equal or exceed 2L or Groundwater Protection Standards
• For constituents that are not naturally occurring and have no established standards, the SWSLs are the Standards
• 1 Analyzed by SW-846 Method 8270
Sample Locations
RuthCent_0415
TABLE 18
NOTIFICATION TABLE
CONSTITUENTS DETECTED AT OR ABOVE SURFACE WATER STANDARDS
CENTRAL SANITARY LANDFILL (#81-03)
RUTHERFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL 27 - MAY 2, 2015
15A NCAC 2B Solid Waste
Parameter Standard for Class Section Limit
8103-SW-2 8103-SW-3 8103-SW-4 8103-SW-5 B,C Surface Water (SWSL)
SILVER 1.8 J 2.8 J 1.2 J 2.8 J 0.06[1]10.0
Notes:
• All results in parts per billion (ppb)
• J - Estimated result. Present but below SWSL
• * - Standard not established
• Shaded cells denote concentrations that equal or exceed 2B Standards or Action Levels
• [1] - Action Level
• NS - Not sampled. Dry location
Sample Location
RuthCent_0415
15A NCAC 2L NC Groundwater Solid Waste
Parameters Standard for Class Protection Section Limit
8103-MW-2 8103-MW-3 8103-MW-4 8103-MW-6 8103-MW-7 8103-MW-8 8103-MW-9 8103-MW-10B 8103-MW-10C 8103-MW-10D 8103-MW-11A 8103-MW-11B 8103-MW-12 8103-MW-13 8103-MW-14 8103-MW-15 GA Groundwater Standard (SWSL)
ANTIMONY 1.2 J 2.4 J *1.0 6.0
CHROMIUM 56.6 67.0 10.0 *10.0
COBALT 1.3 J 2.4 J 36.9 2.8 J 3.0 J 35.7 28.4 17.7 31.1 8.6 J 3.3 J *1.0 10.0
IRON 2,060.0 3,070.0 8,530.0 375.0 7,970.0 1,480.0 1,520.0 668.0 1,380.0 300.0 *300.0
LEAD 19.4 15.0 *10.0
MANGANESE 233.0 5,150.0 672.0 50.0 *50.0
THALLIUM 13.6 5.6 5.6 *0.28 5.5
VANADIUM 1.4 J 3.8 J 11.8 J 1.9 J 5.2 J 0.6 J 0.5 J 8.0 J 108.0 6.4 J 135.0 2.6 J 3.4 J 1.7 J 3.0 J *0.3 25.0
CHLORIDE 278,000.0 250,000.0 **
NITRATE-NITROGEN 10,000.0 *10,000.0
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS 514,000.0 500,000.0 **
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 12.0 0.6 *1.0
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 10.4 6.0 *1.0
BENZENE 1.6 1.7 1.0 *1.0
CHLOROBENZENE 60.8 50.0 *3.0
TETRACHLOROETHENE 1.9 0.7 *1.0
VINYL CHLORIDE 0.5 J 0.8 J 0.4 J 0.6 J 0.3 *1.0
Notes:
• All results in parts per billion (ppb)
• J - Estimated result. Present but below SWSL
• * - Standard not established
• Shaded cells denote concentrations that equal or exceed 2L or Groundwater Protection Standards
• For constituents that are not naturally occurring and have no established standards, the SWSLs are the Standards
Well Number
TABLE 17
NOTIFICATION TABLE
CONSTITUENTS DETECTED AT OR ABOVE GROUNDWATER STANDARDS
CENTRAL SANITARY LANDFILL (# 81-03)
RUTHERFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL 27 - MAY 2, 2015
RuthCent_0415
TABLE 16
SURFACE WATER SAMPLING RESULTS
APPENDIX I VOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS BY SW-846 METHOD 8260
CENTRAL SANITARY LANDFILL (#81-03)
RUTHERFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL 27 - MAY 2, 2015
15A NCAC 2B/EPA Solid WasteParametersStandards for Class Section Limit
8103-SW-2 8103-SW-3 8103-SW-4 8103-SW-5 B,C Surface Water (SWSL)
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL *5.0
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL 2,500.0 1.0
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL *3.0
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL *1.0
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL 20,000.0 5.0
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE BQL BQL BQL BQL 5,400.0 5.0
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE BQL BQL BQL BQL *1.0
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE BQL BQL BQL BQL *13.0
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL *1.0
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE BQL BQL BQL BQL 470.0 5.0
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL *1.0
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BQL BQL BQL BQL *1.0
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE BQL BQL BQL BQL 100.0 1.0
2-BUTANONE BQL BQL BQL BQL 160,000.0 100.0
2-HEXANONE BQL BQL BQL BQL *50.0
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE BQL BQL BQL BQL 26,000.0 100.0
ACETONE BQL BQL BQL BQL 2,000.0 100.0
ACRYLONITRILE BQL BQL BQL BQL *55.0
BENZENE BQL BQL BQL BQL *1.0
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL *3.0
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL *1.0
BROMOFORM BQL BQL BQL BQL *3.0
BROMOMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL *10.0
CARBON DISULFIDE BQL BQL BQL BQL *100.0
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BQL BQL BQL BQL *1.0
CHLOROBENZENE BQL BQL BQL BQL 140.0 3.0
CHLOROETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL *10.0
CHLOROFORM BQL BQL BQL BQL *5.0
CHLOROMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL *1.0
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE BQL BQL BQL BQL *5.0
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BQL BQL BQL BQL 12.0 1.0
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL *3.0
DIBROMOMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL *10.0
ETHYLBENZENE BQL BQL BQL BQL 97.0 1.0
IODOMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL *10.0
METHYLENE CHLORIDE BQL BQL BQL BQL *1.0
STYRENE BQL BQL BQL BQL *1.0
TETRACHLOROETHENE BQL BQL BQL BQL *1.0
TOLUENE BQL BQL BQL BQL 11.0 1.0
TOTAL XYLENES BQL BQL BQL BQL 670.0 5.0
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE BQL BQL BQL BQL *5.0
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BQL BQL BQL BQL 12.0 1.0
TRANS-1,4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE BQL BQL BQL BQL *100.0
TRICHLOROETHENE BQL BQL BQL BQL *1.0
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE BQL BQL BQL BQL *1.0
VINYL ACETATE BQL BQL BQL BQL *50.0
VINYL CHLORIDE BQL BQL BQL BQL *1.0
Notes:
• All results in parts per billion (ppb)
• BQL - Below Method Detection Limit
• J - Estimated result. Present but below SWSL
• * - Standard not established
• Shaded cells denote concentrations that equal or exceed 2B Standards
• For constituents that are not naturally occurring and have no established standards, the SWSLs are the Standards
Sample Location
RuthCent_0415
TABLE 15
SURFACE WATER SAMPLING RESULTS
APPENDIX I INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS BY SW-846 METHOD 6010CENTRAL SANITARY LANDFILL (#81-03)
RUTHERFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL 27 - MAY 2, 2015
15A NCAC 2B Solid Waste
Parameter Standard for Class Section Limit
8103-SW-2 8103-SW-3 8103-SW-4 8103-SW-5A B,C Surface Water (SWSL)
ANTIMONY BQL BQL BQL 1.6 J *6.0
ARSENIC BQL BQL BQL BQL 50.0 10.0
BARIUM 36.0 J 29.4 J 28.6 J 30.1 J *100.0
BERYLLIUM BQL BQL BQL BQL 6.5 1.0
CADMIUM BQL BQL BQL BQL 2.0 1.0
CHROMIUM 1.2 J 0.8 J 1.3 J 1.5 J 50.0 10.0
COBALT BQL BQL 0.7 J BQL *10.0
COPPER BQL BQL BQL BQL 7.0[1]10.0
LEAD BQL BQL BQL BQL 25.0 10.0
NICKEL BQL BQL BQL BQL 88.0 50.0
SELENIUM BQL BQL BQL BQL 5.0 10.0
SILVER 1.8 J 2.8 J 1.2 J 2.8 J 0.06[1]10.0
THALLIUM BQL BQL BQL BQL *5.5
VANADIUM 2.4 J 1.5 J 2.0 J 2.5 J *25.0
ZINC 27.2 28.9 39.4 27.3 50.0[1]10.0
Notes:
• All results in parts per billion (ppb)
• BQL - Below Method Detection Limit
• J - Estimated result. Present but below SWSL
• * - Standard not established
• Shaded cells denote concentrations that equal or exceed 2B Standards or Action Levels
• [1] - Action Level
• NS - Not sampled. Dry location.
Sample Location
RuthCent_0415
TABLE 14
GROUNDWATER FLOW RATES
CENTRAL SANITARY LANDFILL (#81-03)
RUTHERFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL 27 - MAY 2, 2015
Hydraulic
Conductivity Effective Velocity Velocity
Well No.(cm/sec)Gradient Porosity (cm/sec)(ft/yr)
8103-MW-2 1.3 x 10-5 0.077 .20 5.00 x 10-6 5.15
8103-MW-4 3.7 x 10-6 0.038 .20 7.07 x 10-7 0.73
8103-MW-6 2.4 x 10-5 0.126 .20 1.51 x 10-5 15.62
8103-MW-7 2.9 x 10-6 0.230 .201 3.33 x 10-6 3.45
8103-MW-8 1.6 x 10-4 0.029 .20 2.35 x 10-5 24.26
8103-MW-9 2.1 x 10-5 0.025 .20 2.60 x 10-6 2.69

The above results were obtained by using the relation:
V =Ki
n
Where K = hydraulic conductivity
i = gradient
n = effective porosity
V = velocity
1 Porosity value may not reflect true nature of fractured bedrock.
8103-MW-7 is screened in rock.
SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Purge Date May 2, 2015
Source/Well 8103-MW-2 Purge Time 1020 to 1120
Locked: Yes X No Sample Date May 2, 2015
PVC X Steel Stainless Steel Sample Time 1120
Measuring point description: Sampled by E. W. Scarlett
Top of PVC Casing Weather Clear, 64⁰F

Water Level and Well Data
1) Depth to water from measuring point 42.18 ft.
2) Depth to well bottom from measuring point 60.08 ft.
3) Height of water column (h) 17.90 ft.

Well Purging and Sample Collection
1) Purge Method Pneumatic Pump
2) Sample Method Pneumatic Pump
3) Volume of water in well
1" well . . . . (v = 0.041 x h) X 2" well . . . . (v = 0.163 x h) 2.92 gal.
4" well . . . . (v = 0.651 x h) 6" well . . . . (v = 1.5 x h)
4) Volume of water removed prior to sampling 6.4 gal.
5) Was well purged DRY? YES NO X

Field Analysis
1) Temperature 16.43⁰C
2) Specific Conductance 76 µmhos/cm
3) pH 8.05
4) ORP 126 mV
5) DO 10.12 mg/l
6) Turbidity 0.0 NTU
7) Physical Appearance and Odor Slightly cloudy, no odor

Note: Hydrogen sampled @ 1200
SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Purge Date April 28, 2015
Source/Well 8103-MW-3 Purge Time 1100 to 1130
Locked: Yes X No Sample Date April 28, 2015
PVC X Steel Stainless Steel Sample Time 1130
Measuring point description: Sampled by E. W. Scarlett
Top of PVC Casing Weather Clear, 58⁰F

Water Level and Well Data
1) Depth to water from measuring point 32.91 ft.
2) Depth to well bottom from measuring point 47.66 ft.
3) Height of water column (h) 14.75 ft.

Well Purging and Sample Collection
1) Purge Method Pneumatic Pump
2) Sample Method Pneumatic Pump
3) Volume of water in well
1" well . . . . (v = 0.041 x h)
X 2" well . . . . (v = 0.163 x h) 2.40 gal.
4" well . . . . (v = 0.651 x h) 6" well . . . . (v = 1.5 x h)
4) Volume of water removed prior to sampling 10.0+ gal.
5) Was well purged DRY? YES NO X

Field Analysis
1) Temperature 15.4⁰C
2) Specific Conductance 804 µmhos/cm
3) pH 6.24
4) Physical Appearance and Odor Slightly cloudy, reddish tan, no odor

SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Purge Date April 30, 2015
Source/Well 8103-MW-4 Purge Time 1449 to 1530
Locked: Yes X No Sample Date April 30, 2015
PVC X Steel Stainless Steel Sample Time 1530
Measuring point description: Sampled by E. W. Scarlett
Top of PVC Casing Weather Partly cloudy, 70⁰F

Water Level and Well Data
1) Depth to water from measuring point 33.34 ft.
2) Depth to well bottom from measuring point 51.31 ft.
3) Height of water column (h) 17.97 ft.

Well Purging and Sample Collection
1) Purge Method Pneumatic Pump
2) Sample Method Pneumatic Pump
3) Volume of water in well
1" well . . . . (v = 0.041 x h)
X 2" well . . . . (v = 0.163 x h) 2.93 gal.
4" well . . . . (v = 0.651 x h) 6" well . . . . (v = 1.5 x h)
4) Volume of water removed prior to sampling 12.1 gal.
5) Was well purged DRY? YES NO X

Field Analysis
1) Temperature 15.54⁰C
2) Specific Conductance 516 µmhos/cm
3) pH 6.24
4) ORP 43 mV
5) DO 0.00 mg/l
6) Turbidity 0.0 NTU
7) Physical Appearance and Odor Cloudy, gray, septic odor

Note: Hydrogen sampled @ 1610
SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Purge Date April 28, 2015
Source/Well 8103-MW-6 Purge Time 1516 to 1556
Locked: Yes X No Sample Date April 28, 2015
PVC X Steel Stainless Steel Sample Time 1556
Measuring point description: Sampled by E. W. Scarlett
Top of PVC Casing Weather Clear, 67⁰F

Water Level and Well Data
1) Depth to water from measuring point 30.78 ft.
2) Depth to well bottom from measuring point 38.97 ft.
3) Height of water column (h) 8.19 ft.

Well Purging and Sample Collection
1) Purge Method Pneumatic Pump
2) Sample Method Pneumatic Pump
3) Volume of water in well
1" well . . . . (v = 0.041 x h)
X 2" well . . . . (v = 0.163 x h) 1.33 gal.
4" well . . . . (v = 0.651 x h) 6" well . . . . (v = 1.5 x h)
4) Volume of water removed prior to sampling 4.4 gal.
5) Was well purged DRY? YES NO X

Field Analysis
1) Temperature 17.45⁰C
2) Specific Conductance 1400 µmhos/cm
3) pH 6.24
4) ORP -28 mV
5) DO 0.00 mg/l
6) Turbidity 0.0 NTU
7) Physical Appearance and Odor Cloudy, gray, fetid odor

Note: Hydrogen sampled @ 1650
SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Purge Date April 30, 2015
Source/Well 8103-MW-7 Purge Time 1000 to 1015
Locked: Yes X No Sample Date April 30, 2015
PVC X Steel Stainless Steel Sample Time 1030
Measuring point description: Sampled by E. W. Scarlett
Top of PVC Casing Weather Clear, 61⁰F

Water Level and Well Data
1) Depth to water from measuring point 34.56 ft.
2) Depth to well bottom from measuring point 56.19 ft.
3) Height of water column (h) 21.63 ft.

Well Purging and Sample Collection
1) Purge Method Teflon Bailer
2) Sample Method Teflon Bailer
3) Volume of water in well
1" well . . . . (v = 0.041 x h)
X 2" well . . . . (v = 0.163 x h) 3.53 gal.
4" well . . . . (v = 0.651 x h) 6" well . . . . (v = 1.5 x h)
4) Volume of water removed prior to sampling 7.2 gal.
5) Was well purged DRY? YES X NO ___

Field Analysis
1) Temperature 14.9⁰C
2) Specific Conductance 809 µmhos/cm
3) pH 6.43
4) Physical Appearance and Odor Slightly cloudy, no odor

SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Purge Date April 29, 2015
Source/Well 8103-MW-8 Purge Time 1401 to 1441
Locked: Yes X No Sample Date April 29, 2015
PVC X Steel Stainless Steel Sample Time 1441
Measuring point description: Sampled by E. W. Scarlett
Top of PVC Casing Weather Lt. rain, 57⁰F

Water Level and Well Data
1) Depth to water from measuring point 39.99 ft.
2) Depth to well bottom from measuring point 46.95 ft.
3) Height of water column (h) 6.96 ft.

Well Purging and Sample Collection
1) Purge Method Pneumatic Pump
2) Sample Method Pneumatic Pump
3) Volume of water in well
1" well . . . . (v = 0.041 x h)
X 2" well . . . . (v = 0.163 x h) 1.13 gal.
4" well . . . . (v = 0.651 x h) 6" well . . . . (v = 1.5 x h)
4) Volume of water removed prior to sampling 4.0 gal.
5) Was well purged DRY? YES NO X

Field Analysis
1) Temperature 15.66⁰C
2) Specific Conductance 270 µmhos/cm
3) pH 5.83
4) ORP 240 mV
5) DO 3.41 mg/l
6) Turbidity 0.0 NTU
7) Physical Appearance and Odor Slightly silty, tan, no odor

Note: Hydrogen sampled @ 1540
SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Purge Date April 30, 2015
Source/Well 8103-MW-9 Purge Time 1209 to 1254
Locked: Yes X No Sample Date April 30, 2015
PVC X Steel Stainless Steel Sample Time 1254
Measuring point description: Sampled by E. W. Scarlett
Top of PVC Casing Weather Partly cloudy, 68⁰F

Water Level and Well Data
1) Depth to water from measuring point 32.74 ft.
2) Depth to well bottom from measuring point 39.78 ft.
3) Height of water column (h) 7.04 ft.

Well Purging and Sample Collection
1) Purge Method Pneumatic Pump
2) Sample Method Pneumatic Pump
3) Volume of water in well
1" well . . . . (v = 0.041 x h)
X 2" well . . . . (v = 0.163 x h) 1.15 gal.
4" well . . . . (v = 0.651 x h) 6" well . . . . (v = 1.5 x h)
4) Volume of water removed prior to sampling 6.0 gal.
5) Was well purged DRY? YES NO X

Field Analysis
1) Temperature 16.34⁰C
2) Specific Conductance 24.0 µmhos/cm
3) pH 5.38
4) ORP 292 mV
5) DO 5.36 mg/l
6) Turbidity 0.0 NTU
7) Physical Appearance and Odor Clear, no odor

Note: Hydrogen sampled @ 1350
SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Purge Date April 29, 2015
Source/Well 8103-MW-10A Purge Time - to -
Locked: Yes X No Sample Date NS
PVC X Steel Stainless Steel Sample Time NS
Measuring point description: Sampled by NS
Top of PVC Casing Weather Cloudy, 60⁰F

Water Level and Well Data
1) Depth to water from measuring point 6.05 f t.
2) Depth to well bottom from measuring point 103.50 ft.
3) Height of water column (h) 97.45 ft.

Well Purging and Sample Collection
1) Purge Method -
2) Sample Method -
3) Volume of water in well
1" well . . . . (v = 0.041 x h)
X 2" well . . . . (v = 0.163 x h) - gal.
4" well . . . . (v = 0.651 x h) 6" well . . . . (v = 1.5 x h)
4) Volume of water removed prior to sampling - gal.
5) Was well purged DRY? YES NO __

Field Analysis
1) Temperature -
2) Specific Conductance -
3) pH -
4) Physical Appearance and Odor -

NS – Not Sampled
Note: Well not used for sample collection. See text.
SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Purge Date April 29, 2015
Source/Well 8103-MW-10B Purge Time 1125 to 1135
Locked: Yes X No Sample Date April 29, 2015
PVC X Steel Stainless Steel Sample Time 1155
Measuring point description: Sampled by E. W. Scarlett
Top of PVC Casing Weather Cloudy, 60⁰F

Water Level and Well Data
1) Depth to water from measuring point 8.44 ft.
2) Depth to well bottom from measuring point 38.65 ft.
3) Height of water column (h) 30.21 ft.

Well Purging and Sample Collection
1) Purge Method Teflon Bailer
2) Sample Method Teflon Bailer
3) Volume of water in well
1" well . . . . (v = 0.041 x h)
X 2" well . . . . (v = 0.163 x h) 4.92 gal.
4" well . . . . (v = 0.651 x h) 6" well . . . . (v = 1.5 x h)
4) Volume of water removed prior to sampling 5.8 gal.
5) Was well purged DRY? YES X NO __

Field Analysis
1) Temperature 14.2⁰C
2) Specific Conductance 123.2 µmhos/cm
3) pH 5.94
4) Physical Appearance and Odor Slightly cloudy, tan, no odor
SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Purge Date April 29, 2015
Source/Well 8103-MW-10C Purge Time 1105 to 1115
Locked: Yes X No Sample Date April 29, 2015
PVC X Steel Stainless Steel Sample Time 1120
Measuring point description: Sampled by E. W. Scarlett
Top of PVC Casing Weather Cloudy, 60⁰F

Water Level and Well Data
1) Depth to water from measuring point 8.22 f t.
2) Depth to well bottom from measuring point 17.69 ft.
3) Height of water column (h) 9.47 ft.

Well Purging and Sample Collection
1) Purge Method Teflon Bailer
2) Sample Method Teflon Bailer
3) Volume of water in well
1" well . . . . (v = 0.041 x h)
X 2" well . . . . (v = 0.163 x h) 1.54 gal.
4" well . . . . (v = 0.651 x h) 6" well . . . . (v = 1.5 x h)
4) Volume of water removed prior to sampling 4.6 gal.
5) Was well purged DRY? YES NO X

Field Analysis
1) Temperature 12.9⁰C
2) Specific Conductance 109.0 µmhos/cm
3) pH 5.98
4) Physical Appearance and Odor Cloudy, reddish-tan, no odor
SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Purge Date April 29, 2015
Source/Well 8103-MW-10D Purge Time 1045 to 1220
Locked: Yes X No Sample Date April 29, 2015
PVC X Steel Stainless Steel Sample Time 1220
Measuring point description: Sampled by E. W. Scarlett
Top of PVC Casing Weather Cloudy, 60⁰F

Water Level and Well Data
1) Depth to water from measuring point 9.32 ft.
2) Depth to well bottom from measuring point 68.50 ft.
3) Height of water column (h) 59.18 ft.

Well Purging and Sample Collection
1) Purge Method Pneumatic Pump
2) Sample Method Pneumatic Pump
3) Volume of water in well
1" well . . . . (v = 0.041 x h)
X 2" well . . . . (v = 0.163 x h) 9.66 gal.
4" well . . . . (v = 0.651 x h) 6" well . . . . (v = 1.5 x h)
4) Volume of water removed prior to sampling 24.5 gal.
5) Was well purged DRY? YES NO X

Field Analysis
1) Temperature 14.72⁰C
2) Specific Conductance 192 µmhos/cm
3) pH 5.85
4) ORP 112 mV
5) DO 0.00 mg/l
6) Turbidity 0.0 NTU
7) Physical Appearance and Odor Clear, no odor

Note: Hydrogen sampled @ 1303
SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Purge Date April 28, 2015
Source/Well 8103-MW-11A Purge Time 1229 to 1339
Locked: Yes X No Sample Date April 28, 2015
PVC X Steel Stainless Steel Sample Time 1339
Measuring point description: Sampled by E. W. Scarlett
Top of PVC Casing Weather Clear, 62⁰F

Water Level and Well Data
1) Depth to water from measuring point 8.11 ft.
2) Depth to well bottom from measuring point 46.79 ft.
3) Height of water column (h) 38.68 ft.

Well Purging and Sample Collection
1) Purge Method Pneumatic Pump
2) Sample Method Pneumatic Pump
3) Volume of water in well
1" well . . . . (v = 0.041 x h)
X 2" well . . . . (v = 0.163 x h) 6.30 gal.
4" well . . . . (v = 0.651 x h) 6" well . . . . (v = 1.5 x h)
4) Volume of water removed prior to sampling 18.9 gal.
5) Was well purged DRY? YES NO X

Field Analysis
1) Temperature 14.99⁰C
2) Specific Conductance 475 µmhos/cm
3) pH 5.86
4) ORP 11 mV
5) DO 0.00 mg/l
6) Turbidity 20.7 NTU
7) Physical Appearance and Odor Cloudy, gray, no odor

Note: Hydrogen sampled @ 1420
SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Purge Date April 28, 2015
Source/Well 8103-MW-11B Purge Time 1255 to 1310
Locked: Yes X No Sample Date April 28, 2015
PVC X Steel Stainless Steel Sample Time 1315
Measuring point description: Sampled by E. W. Scarlett
Top of PVC Casing Weather Clear, 62⁰F

Water Level and Well Data
1) Depth to water from measuring point 9.32 ft.
2) Depth to well bottom from measuring point 21.40 ft.
3) Height of water column (h) 12.08 ft.

Well Purging and Sample Collection
1) Purge Method Teflon Bailer
2) Sample Method Teflon Bailer
3) Volume of water in well
1" well . . . . (v = 0.041 x h)
X 2" well . . . . (v = 0.163 x h) 1.97 gal.
4" well . . . . (v = 0.651 x h) 6" well . . . . (v = 1.5 x h)
4) Volume of water removed prior to sampling 5.9 gal.
5) Was well purged DRY? YES NO X

Field Analysis
1) Temperature 13.1⁰C
2) Specific Conductance 172.6 µmhos/cm
3) pH 5.53
4) Physical Appearance and Odor Silty, tan, no odor
SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Purge Date April 27, 2015
Source/Well 8103-MW-12 Purge Time 1145 to 1410
Locked: Yes X No Sample Date April 27, 2015
PVC X Steel Stainless Steel Sample Time 1425
Measuring point description: Sampled by E. W. Scarlett
Top of PVC Casing Weather Partly cloudy, 64⁰F

Water Level and Well Data
1) Depth to water from measuring point 31.97 ft.
2) Depth to well bottom from measuring point 52.35 ft.
3) Height of water column (h) 20.38 ft.

Well Purging and Sample Collection
1) Purge Method Teflon Bailer
2) Sample Method Teflon Bailer
3) Volume of water in well
1" well . . . . (v = 0.041 x h)
X 2" well . . . . (v = 0.163 x h)
4" well . . . . (v = 0.651 x h) 3.32 gal. 6" well . . . . (v = 1.5 x h)
4) Volume of water removed prior to sampling 10.0 gal.
5) Was well purged DRY? YES NO X

Field Analysis
1) Temperature 15.7⁰C
2) Specific Conductance 603 µmhos/cm
3) pH 6.12
4) Physical Appearance and Odor Silty, tan-gray, fetid odor

SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Purge Date April 27, 2015
Source/Well 8103-MW-13 Purge Time 1645 to 1715
Locked: Yes X No Sample Date April 27, 2015
PVC X Steel Stainless Steel Sample Time 1730
Measuring point description: Sampled by E. W. Scarlett
Top of PVC Casing Weather Partly cloudy, 69⁰F

Water Level and Well Data
1) Depth to water from measuring point 80.60 ft.
2) Depth to well bottom from measuring point 90.10 ft.
3) Height of water column (h) 9.50 ft.

Well Purging and Sample Collection
1) Purge Method Teflon Bailer
2) Sample Method Teflon Bailer
3) Volume of water in well
1" well . . . . (v = 0.041 x h)
X 2" well . . . . (v = 0.163 x h) 1.55 gal.
4" well . . . . (v = 0.651 x h) 6" well . . . . (v = 1.5 x h)
4) Volume of water removed prior to sampling 4.7 gal.
5) Was well purged DRY? YES NO X

Field Analysis
1) Temperature 16.0⁰C
2) Specific Conductance 170.3 µmhos/cm
3) pH 5.35
4) Physical Appearance and Odor Silty, gray, no odor
SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Purge Date April 27, 2015
Source/Well 8103-MW-14 Purge Time 1215 to 1230
Locked: Yes No X Sample Date April 27, 2015
PVC X Steel Stainless Steel Sample Time 1535
Measuring point description: Sampled by E. W. Scarlett
Top of PVC Casing Weather Partly cloudy, 63⁰F

Water Level and Well Data
1) Depth to water from measuring point 21.71 ft.
2) Depth to well bottom from measuring point 34.80 ft.
3) Height of water column (h) 13.09 ft.

Well Purging and Sample Collection
1) Purge Method Teflon Bailer
2) Sample Method Teflon Bailer
3) Volume of water in well
1" well . . . . (v = 0.041 x h)
X 2" well . . . . (v = 0.163 x h)
4" well . . . . (v = 0.651 x h) 2.13 gal. 6" well . . . . (v = 1.5 x h)
4) Volume of water removed prior to sampling 6.4 gal.
5) Was well purged DRY? YES NO X

Field Analysis
1) Temperature 16.0⁰C
2) Specific Conductance 233.0 µmhos/cm
3) pH 5.58
4) Physical Appearance and Odor Muddy, tan, no odor
SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Purge Date April 27, 2015
Source/Well 8103-MW-15 Purge Time 1300 to 1308
Locked: Yes X No Sample Date April 27, 2015
PVC X Steel Stainless Steel Sample Time 1600
Measuring point description: Sampled by E. W. Scarlett
Top of PVC Casing Weather Partly cloudy, 63⁰F

Water Level and Well Data
1) Depth to water from measuring point 30.44 ft.
2) Depth to well bottom from measuring point 39.96 ft.
3) Height of water column (h) 9.52 ft.

Well Purging and Sample Collection
1) Purge Method Teflon Bailer
2) Sample Method Teflon Bailer
3) Volume of water in well
1" well . . . . (v = 0.041 x h)
X 2" well . . . . (v = 0.163 x h)
4" well . . . . (v = 0.651 x h) 1.55 gal. 6" well . . . . (v = 1.5 x h)
4) Volume of water removed prior to sampling 4.7 gal.
5) Was well purged DRY? YES NO X

Field Analysis
1) Temperature 15.9⁰C
2) Specific Conductance 145.8 µmhos/cm
3) pH 5.48
4) Physical Appearance and Odor Cloudy, tan, no odor
SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

SURFACE WATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Sample Date April 27, 2015
Source/Well 8103-SW-2 Time 1450
Sampled by E. W. Scarlett Weather Partly cloudy, 65⁰F

Field Analysis

1) Temperature 15.4⁰C
2) Specific Conductance 79.3 µmhos/cm
3) pH 7.13
4) Physical Appearance and Odor Clear, no odor
SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

SURFACE WATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Sample Date April 27, 2015
Source/Well 8103-SW-3 Time 1815
Sampled by E. W. Scarlett Weather Hazy, 68⁰F

Field Analysis

1) Temperature 16.0⁰C
2) Specific Conductance 71.1 µmhos/cm
3) pH 6.57
4) Physical Appearance and Odor Clear, no odor
SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

SURFACE WATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Sample Date April 27, 2015
Source/Well 8103-SW-4 Time 1130
Sampled by E. W. Scarlett Weather Partly cloudy, 61⁰F

Field Analysis

1) Temperature 14.2⁰C
2) Specific Conductance 47.9 µmhos/cm
3) pH 6.27
4) Physical Appearance and Odor Clear, no odor

SCARLETT GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTING, P.C.

SURFACE WATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA

Location Rutherford County Central Sample Date April 27, 2015
Source/Well 8103-SW-5A Time 1510
Sampled by E. W. Scarlett Weather Partly cloudy, 65⁰F

Field Analysis

1) Temperature 15.4⁰C
2) Specific Conductance 60.0 µmhos/cm
3) pH 6.82
4) Physical Appearance and Odor Clear, no odor