4304_CentralCarolinaTire_Phase3_Oct2016_2ndSemiAnnual_DIN27002_20161026

11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
Explanatory Text for Notification Table
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase III
Cameron, Harnett, NC
Permit # 43-04
October 3, 2016 Water Quality Monitoring
The results of the October 2016 groundwater and surface water quality monitoring
conducted at the Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill are generally consistent with the
results of previous monitoring conducted at the site. No RCRA metals were reported in
the surface water sample at concentrations that exceed the 15A NCAC 2L .0202
groundwater quality standards or the 15A NCAC 2B surface water quality standards. In
addition, no Appendix I VOCs were detected in the surface water sample.

Acetone was detected at trace levels well below the 15A NCAC 2L groundwater quality
standard in the groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells MW-12 (4.2 µg/L,
estimated) and MW-17AR (5 µg/L). No other Appendix I VOCs were reported in any of
the groundwater samples. The concentration of chromium reported in the groundwater
sample collected from monitoring well MW-17AR (21 µg/L) exceeds the 15A NCAC 2L
groundwater quality standard of 10.0 µg/L. It is noted, however, that the turbidity of the
groundwater sample collected from MW-17AR was significantly elevated (647.4 NTUs).
The October 2016 monitoring event is the first event in over 10 years of monitoring in
which chromium has been reported at a concentration in excess of the 15A NCAC 2L
groundwater quality standard at the location of MW-17/17AR. Therefore, it is concluded
that the elevated concentration of chromium reported in the groundwater sample
collected from monitoring well MW-17AR in October 2016 is the result of significantly
elevated sample turbidity. None of the other reported concentrations of metals detected
in any of the groundwater samples exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202
groundwater quality standards.

11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]

October 26, 2016

Ms. Elizabeth S. Werner, Hydrogeologist
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1646

RE: Report of Results
Semi-Annual Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring: October 2016
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase III
Cameron, Harnett County, NC
Permit # 43-04

Dear Ms. Werner:

This report presents the results of semi-annual groundwater and surface water quality
monitoring conducted at the landfill site referenced above (Figure 1) in October 2016.
The scope of work performed included sampling and laboratory analysis of groundwater
samples from eight on-site monitoring wells (MW-10 through MW-14 and MW-16
through MW-18) and one surface water sample (SW-1 (EXP)). It is noted that
monitoring well MW-17 was abandoned on August 30, 2011 and replaced with
monitoring well MW-17AR in accordance with the facility Water Quality Monitoring Plan
submitted as part of the Application for Permit Amendment 5-Year Phase (2011-2016)
prepared by Garrett & Moore, Inc. The Water Quality Monitoring Plan was approved by
the NCDEQ, Division of Waste Management (DWM), Solid Waste Section (SWS), in a
letter to Central Carolina Tire Holdings, LLC dated August 10, 2011. The groundwater
and surface water samples were collected in accordance with the NCDEQ, DWM, SWS
Guidelines for Groundwater, Soil, and Surface Water Sampling Document and the
facility Water Quality Monitoring Plan. The sampling and data collection methods, as
well as the current and historical results of field and laboratory testing of the water
samples, are presented in the following sections.

– 2 – October 26, 2016
11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
1.0 POTENTIOMETRIC PATTERN AND GROUNDWATER FLOW

Groundwater levels were gauged in the site groundwater monitoring wells on October 3,
2016 as part of the site monitoring. Depths to groundwater were measured using an
electronic water level probe that was thoroughly decontaminated between wells with a
non-phosphate soap and water wash followed in order by multiple rinses with distilled
water, an isopropyl alcohol rinse, and multiple distilled water rinses. Depth to
groundwater measurements were made after the wells were opened for a sufficient
period of time to allow water levels to equilibrate with atmospheric pressure. The
locations of the site monitoring wells are depicted in Figure 2. Groundwater elevation
data collected at the monitoring wells on October 3, 2016 are presented in Table 1. The
depth to groundwater across the site, as measured in the Type II groundwater
monitoring wells on October 3, 2016, ranged from 0.97 feet (MW-12) to 16.48 feet (MW-
16) below grade, which is consistent with the surface topography.

A water-table elevation contour map that was developed based on the October 3, 2016
groundwater-gauging data for the Type II monitoring wells is presented as Figure 3.
The pattern of the water-table contours indicates that the horizontal component of
shallow groundwater flow at the site is generally to the southeast, which is consistent
with the surface topography and drainage features at the site. The hydraulic gradient of
the water table across the site, based on the data depicted in Figure 3, varies from
approximately 0.003 ft/ft in the northern part of the site to 0.012 ft./ft. in the southeastern
part of the site.

2.0 RESULTS OF GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING AND
ANALYSIS

Groundwater samples were collected from the site monitoring wells and a surface water
sample was collected from the on-site location on October 3, 2016 for laboratory
analysis to monitor the quality of groundwater and surface water at the site. The
groundwater and surface water samples were collected and handled in accordance with
the sampling protocols included in the site Water Quality Monitoring Plan as well as the
SWS Guidelines for Groundwater, Soil, and Surface Water Sampling Document. It is
noted that monitoring well MW-10 serves as the upgradient, natural background well for
the facility, and monitoring wells MW-11 through MW-14 and MW-16 through MW-18
serve as the downgradient monitoring wells. All reusable sampling equipment was
– 3 – October 26, 2016
11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
properly decontaminated between sampling locations with a non-phosphate soap and
water wash, followed by multiple rinses with distilled water. New disposable nitrile or
latex gloves were worn during all sampling activities. Disposable sampling
equipment/material was discarded after each use.

Prior to groundwater sampling, all monitoring wells were purged using pre-cleaned
Teflon-lined disposable polyethylene tubing connected to a peristaltic pump under low
flow conditions. During purging, measurements were made in the field of the pH,
temperature, specific conductance and turbidity of the groundwater collected from the
monitoring wells, in accordance with SWS requirements. The results of the field
analyses of these parameters are presented in Table 1. Copies of Groundwater
Sampling Forms containing pertinent information recorded in the field during purging
and sampling at each groundwater monitoring well are presented in Appendix A. The
results of the field-measured water-quality parameters indicate that the values
measured in groundwater collected from the site monitoring wells, with the exception of
turbidity at MW-17AR and MW-18, were generally within the applicable stabilization
criteria (see Groundwater Sampling Forms). Groundwater at the site is acidic to
moderately acidic based on the pH values measured in the field (4.27 to 5.09). Specific
conductance values ranged from 16 (MW-13) to 173 (MW-10) µS/cm in groundwater.
Turbidity values ranged from 5.08 (MW-11) to 647.4 (MW-17AR) NTUs.

A surface water sample was collected from monitoring location SW-1 (EXP), which is
located approximately 280 feet southeast of the planned limits of scrap tire disposal
along the primary drainage feature that bisects the southeastern portion of the Phase III
landfill footprint. The sampling location is depicted in Figure 2. The surface water
sample was collected in accordance with the protocol presented in the SWS Guidelines
for Groundwater, Soil, and Surface Water Sampling Document.

All groundwater and surface water samples were analyzed at a North Carolina-certified
laboratory for Appendix I volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by SW 846 Method 8260
and the 8 RCRA metals by EPA 6000/7000 series methods. Summarized results of
laboratory analyses for groundwater and surface water samples collected from the site
on October 3, 2016 are presented in Table 2. Summarized historical groundwater and
surface water quality data for the site are presented in Table 3. Copies of the original
laboratory reports are included in Appendix B.

– 4 – October 26, 2016
11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
The laboratory analytical results for the surface water sample (SW-1 (EXP)) collected
from the site indicate that no Appendix I VOCs were reported in the sample. Low levels
of arsenic, barium, cadmium, lead, and selenium were reported in surface water sample
SW-1 (EXP), however, the reported concentrations were well below the corresponding
15A NCAC 2L groundwater quality standards and the 15A NCAC 2B surface water
standards applicable to the site.

The laboratory analytical results for the groundwater samples collected from the site
monitoring wells on October 3, 2016 indicate that acetone was detected at trace levels
well below the 15A NCAC 2L groundwater quality standard in the samples collected
from monitoring wells MW-12 (4.2 µg/L, estimated) and MW-17AR (5 µg/L). No other
Appendix I VOCs were reported in any of the groundwater samples. The results of the
metals analyses of the groundwater samples indicate that arsenic was reported in five
of the samples, barium, cadmium, and lead were reported in all of the samples,
chromium was reported in four of the samples, mercury was not reported in any of the
samples, and selenium and silver were each reported in two of the samples. The
concentration of chromium reported in the groundwater sample collected from
monitoring well MW-17AR (21 µg/L) exceeds the 15A NCAC 2L groundwater quality
standard of 10.0 µg/L. It is noted, however, that the turbidity of the groundwater sample
collected from MW-17AR was significantly elevated (647.4 NTUs). The October 2016
monitoring event is the first event in over 10 years of monitoring in which chromium has
been reported at a concentration in excess of the 15A NCAC 2L groundwater quality
standard at the location of MW-17/17AR. Therefore, it is concluded that the elevated
concentration of chromium reported in the groundwater sample collected from
monitoring well MW-17AR in October 2016 is the result of significantly elevated sample
turbidity. None of the other reported concentrations of metals detected in any of the
groundwater samples exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202 groundwater
quality standards. Monitoring wells MW-17AR and MW-18 will be redeveloped before
the next scheduled semiannual monitoring event to clear the wells of excess sediment.

3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The results of the October 2016 groundwater and surface water quality monitoring
conducted at the Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill are generally consistent with the
results of previous monitoring conducted at the site. No RCRA metals were reported in
the surface water sample at concentrations that exceed the 15A NCAC 2L .0202
– 5 – October 26, 2016
11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
groundwater quality standards or the 15A NCAC 2B surface water quality standards. In
addition, no Appendix I VOCs were detected in the surface water sample. Acetone was
detected at trace levels well below the 15A NCAC 2L groundwater quality standard in
the groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells MW-12 (4.2 µg/L, estimated)
and MW-17AR (5 µg/L). No other Appendix I VOCs were reported in any of the
groundwater samples. The concentration of chromium reported in the groundwater
sample collected from monitoring well MW-17AR (21 µg/L) exceeds the 15A NCAC 2L
groundwater quality standard of 10.0 µg/L. It is noted, however, that the turbidity of the
groundwater sample collected from MW-17AR was significantly elevated (647.4 NTUs).
The October 2016 monitoring event is the first event in over 10 years of monitoring in
which chromium has been reported at a concentration in excess of the 15A NCAC 2L
groundwater quality standard at the location of MW-17/17AR. Therefore, it is concluded
that the elevated concentration of chromium reported in the groundwater sample
collected from monitoring well MW-17AR in October 2016 is the result of significantly
elevated sample turbidity. None of the other reported concentrations of metals detected
in any of the groundwater samples exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202
groundwater quality standards.

If you have any questions or require further assistance regarding this report, please call
me at 919-995-0363. The next water quality monitoring event for the Central Carolina
Tire Monofill Landfill is scheduled for April 2017.

Sincerely,
Brian S. Boutin, P.G.
Consulting Geologist

Cc: Tim McNeil, Central Carolina Holdings, Inc.
Vance Moore, Garrett and Moore, Inc.
Craig Fortner, Garrett & Moore, Inc.
Drawn by: Reviewed by: Drawing #:
Drawing Date: 1
SITE LOCATION MAP
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill
Harnett County, North Carolina
Source: USGS 7.5’ Topographic Quadrangle Series
Murchisontown, NC 2010
Figure No. Project #:
Scale: USGS
1:24,000 05/31/2012
N
11112 Branding Iron Place Wendell, NC 27591
Office: [phone]
Cell: [phone]
Central Carolina Tire
334
335
336
337
338
338
339
339
340
340
341
341
34
2
34
2
3
4
3
34
3
3
4
4
3
4
4
(343.78)
(340.49)
(333.48)
(333.98)
(339.49)
(344.11)
(346.38)
(339.11)
MW-10 27.0 2.0 356.28 353.74 12.50 343.78 21.4 5.09 173 6.22
MW-11 23.8 2.0 347.80 345.70 7.31 340.49 22.4 4.39 36 5.08
MW-12 21.6 2.0 336.58 334.45 3.10 333.48 24.0 4.29 25 16.8
MW-13 20.6 2.0 339.47 337.36 5.49 333.98 21.8 4.44 16 5.77
MW-14 12.6 2.0 344.12 341.86 4.63 339.49 22.9 4.87 29 9.66
MW-16 28.9 2.0 362.53 360.59 18.42 344.11 20.8 4.32 48 6.54
MW-17AR 20.0 2.0 352.99 350.70 6.61 346.38 22.9 4.54 55 647.4
MW-18 14.8 2.0 344.71 342.45 5.60 339.11 23.1 4.27 38 108.6
Notes:MSL = Mean Sea Level
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
GW = Groundwater
S.C. = Specific Conductance
ntu = Nephelometric Turbidity Units
Monitoring well construction data taken from October-December 2006 Sampling Event Monitoring Report prepared by Withers & Ravenel.
Well Diameter
(Inches)
Field Parameters
Turbidity
(ntu)
Ground
Surface
Elevation
(Feet MSL)
Groundwater
Elevation
(Feet MSL)
Depth to
Groundwater
(Feet BTOC)
Top of Casing
Elevation (Feet
MSL)
Monitoring Well and Groundwater Data
Table 1
October 2016 Sampling Event
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase III
Harnett County, North Carolina
Well
Identity Temp. Co
October 3, 2016
Well Depth
(Feet BTOC)pH S.C.
umhos/cm
Permit # 43-04
ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS GWP Std NCAC 2L STD
(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)
Acetone ND ND ND 4.2 J ND ND ND 5 ND NE 6000
Acrylonitrile ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE NE
Benzene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 1
Bromochloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.6 NE
Bromodichloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.6
Bromoform (Tribromoethane)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 4
Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 10
2-Butanone (MEK), (Methyl Ethyl Ketone)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 4000
Carbon Disulfide ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 700
Carbon Tetrachloride ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.3
Chlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 50
Chloroethane (Ethyl Chloride)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 3000
Chloroform (Trichloromethane)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 70
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.04
Dibromochloromethane (Chlorodibromomethane)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.41 0.4
1,2,-Dibromoethane (Ethylene Dibromide)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.02
Dibromomethane (Methylene Bromide)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.5 70
1,2-Dichlorobenzene (O-Dichlorobenzene)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 20
1,3-Dichlorobenzene (M-Dichlorobenzene)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 200
1,4-Dichlorobenzene (P-Dichlorobenzene)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 6
Trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE NE
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 6
1,2-Dichloroethane (Ethylene Dichloride)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.4
1,1-Dichloroethene (Vinylidene Chloride)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 7
1,2-Dichloroethene (cis and trans isomers)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 60 60
1,2-Dichloropropane (Propylene Dichloride)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.6
1,1-Dichloropropene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE NE
1,3-Dichloropropene (cis and trans isomers)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.4
Ethylbenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 600
Iodomethane (Methyl Iodide)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE NE
2-Hexanone (Methyl Butyl Ketone)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 280
Methyl Chloride (Chloromethane)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 3
Methylene Chloride (Dichloromethane)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 5
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (Methyl Isobutyl Ketone)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 560 NE
Styrene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 70
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.18 0.2
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene), (PCE)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.7
Toluene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 600
1,1,1-Trichloroethane (Methylchloroform)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 200
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.6 0.6
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene), (TCE)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 3
Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 2000
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.005
Vinyl Acetate ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 88 88
Vinyl Chloride ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.03
Total Xylenes ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 500
INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS GWP Std NCAC 2L STD
(in ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)
Arsenic 0.67 J 0.69 J ND 3.6 ND 0.31 J ND 5.3 0.70 J NE 10
Barium 28 50 28 9.5 4.1 J 27 58 39 20 NE 700
Cadmium 0.049 J 0.45 J 0.069 J 0.042 J 0.10 J 0.12 J 0.059 J 0.11 J 0.062 J NE 2
Chromium ND 2.0 ND 2.2 ND ND ND 21 3.6 NE 10
Lead 0.39 J 0.17 J 0.32 J 0.50 J 0.29 J 0.44 J 0.57 J 13 2.0 NE 15
Mercury ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 1
Selenium 1.2 5.2 ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 J ND NE 20
Silver ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.28 J 0.064 J NE 20
Notes:
Values in boldface exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202 groundwater quality standard for Class GA groundwater.J = Estimated value above laboratory method detection limit and below SWSL or reporting limit.
NCAC 2L STD = North Carolina Groundwater Standard established in Title 15A of North Carolina Administrative Code Subchapter 2L B = Analyte found in associated field and/or laboratory blank.
GWP Std = Solid Waste Section Groundwater Protection Standard NE = No standard established.
ND = None detected above laboratory method detection limit.
Table 2
SW-1 (EXP)MW-13 MW-14
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase III, Harnett County, NC
Laboratory Results for Surface Water and Groundwater Samples
October 3, 2016
October 2016 Sampling Event
MW-16
Permit # 43-04
NS = Not Sampled, No sample exists for this sampling period
MW-17ARMW-11 MW-18MW-10 MW-12
Page 1 of 2
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/23/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/5/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/2/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16 10/3/16
Well No:MW-10
Arsenic 10 ND ND 1.91 J 2.25 J ND ND 1.5 J ND ND 1.40 1.90 1.80 ND 1.10 ND 1.60 0.77 J 0.64 J 0.69 J
Barium 700 78.0 J 39.2 JB 53.8 JB 63.3 JB 27.8 JB 22.0 0.17 J 32.0 25.0 33.0 17.0 40.0 18.0 29.0 39.0 29.0 40.0 36 50
Cadmium 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.69 J ND ND ND ND 0.094 J ND 0.049 J ND ND 0.052 J 0.086 J 0.45 JChromium101.46 J 2.47 JB 1.45 JB 3.01 JB 2.86 JB 0.55 J ND ND 8.4 BJ ND 2.7 B ND ND ND ND 0.26 J 0.51 J ND 2.0Lead155.11 J 4.90 J ND ND ND 0.71 J ND ND 0.95 J 0.21 J 0.28 J 0.2 J 0.26 J 0.33 J ND 0.18 J 0.32 J 0.26 J 0.17 J
Mercury 1 ND ND ND 0.281 J ND ND ND ND 0.019 J ND ND ND 0.18 J 0.34 0.15 J 1.80 0.23 1.70 ND
Selenium 20 ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 ND ND 7.20 6.50 7.70 2.00 3.80 3.50 8.60 6.00 8.4 5.2
Silver 20 ND 2.37 JB 3.41 JB ND ND ND ND ND 0.45 J ND 0.18 J ND ND 0.056 J ND ND ND ND NDAcetone6000ND1.83 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDBromoform4NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND1.10 ND ND ND ND
Trichloroethene 3 ND ND ND 0.380 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Toluene 600 ND ND 5.54 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/15/08 4/23/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/5/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/2/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16 10/3/16
Well No:MW-11
Arsenic 10 2.59 J ND ND 2.43 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.37 J ND ND ND ND 0.48 J NDBarium70019.5 J 55.1 JB 44.6 JB 60.5 JB 29.6 JB 65.0 51.0 33.0 25.0 27.0 28.0 28.0 29.0 63.0 23.0 55.0 43.0 54.0 28Cadmium2NDNDNDNDNDND2.1 ND 0.27 J ND ND 0.061 J 1.4 ND ND ND 0.14 J 0.16 J 0.069 J
Chromium 10 1.31 J 6.94 JB 1.35 JB 3.99 JB 3.42 JB ND 1.5 J ND 7.2 B ND 2.8 B 1.1 B ND ND ND ND 0.64 J 0.54 J ND
Lead 15 ND 10.60 ND 5.01 JB ND ND 0.81 J ND 0.89 J 0.30 J 0.38 J 0.37 J 0.88 J 0.20 J 0.21 J 0.22 J 0.60 J 0.69 J 0.32 J
Mercury 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.86 1.20 NDSelenium20NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.47 J 0.70 J 1.00 0.62 J ND ND ND ND 0.83 J 0.98 J NDSilver20ND2.03 JB 3.91 JB 1.49 JB 1.56 JB ND ND ND 0.33 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Methylene Chloride 5 ND ND 0.830 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/15/08 4/23/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/5/11 4/27/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/2/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16 10/3/16
Well No:MW-12
Arsenic 10 ND 2.32 J ND 3.00 J ND ND ND ND 0.12 J 0.38 J ND ND 2.70 0.83 J 14.00 0.63 J 2.10 4.00 3.6
Barium 700 97.8 J 46.2 JB 23.8 JB 56.2 JB 24.8 JB 5.7 J 11 J 14.0 16.0 15.0 13.0 15.0 17.0 9.0 22.0 8.9 15.0 11.0 9.5Cadmium2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.18 J 0.088 J 0.042 JChromium103.04 J 11.6 B 3.25 JB 7.16 JB 4.08 JB 1.6 J 2 J ND 5.60 ND 3.6 B 1.6 B 0.95 J 0.47 J 2.40 1.30 5.70 3.90 2.2
Lead 15 ND 6.31 J 4.80 J 9.68 JB ND 0.81 J 2 J ND 0.62 J 0.64 J 0.96 J 0.41 J 1.70 0.49 J 1.60 0.90 J 2.40 1.70 0.50 J
Mercury 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.12 J ND ND
Selenium 20 ND 7.32 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.34 J ND ND ND ND ND 0.72 J NDSilver20ND1.93 JB 4.01 JB 1.82 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.013 J NDAcetone6000NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND6.60 ND ND ND 4.2 J
Chloroform 70 0.150 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Methylene Chloride 5 ND ND 0.390 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2-Butanone (MEK)4000 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 9.80 ND ND ND NDToluene600ND0.510 JB 0.510 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 4.5 ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/15/08 4/23/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/5/11 4/27/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/2/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16 10/3/16
Well No:MW-13Arsenic 10 3.79 J ND ND ND ND 3.1 J ND ND ND ND 0.60 J ND 0.50 J ND ND ND ND ND ND
Barium 700 9.36 J 19.8 JB 14.9 JB 18.5 JB 8.7 JB 7.4 J 4.8 J 6.3 J 7.5 3.9 J 6.0 7.1 11.0 4.5 J 4.2 J 4.9 J 13.0 7.0 4.1 J
Cadmium 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.19 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 J 0.089 J 0.10 J
Chromium 10 3.26 J 3.07 JB ND 3.60 JB 3.05 JB 2.1 J 1.3 J ND 3.6 B ND 2.6 B 1.1 B ND ND ND ND 1.50 ND NDLead15ND8.32 J 4.75 J 7.51 JB ND ND ND ND 0.41 J 0.24 J 0.21 J 0.18 J 0.83 J 0.12 J 0.26 J ND 1.1 0.27 J 0.29 JMercury1NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.068 J ND ND
Selenium 20 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.36 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Silver 20 ND 2.88 JB 3.65 JB 1.12 JB 0.78 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Bromoform 4 ND ND ND ND 0.27 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/15/08 4/23/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/5/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/2/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16 10/3/16
Well No:MW-14
Arsenic 10 3.12 J ND ND 2.50 J ND ND 1.9 J ND ND 0.12 J 0.30 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.31 J
Barium 700 113.0 180 B 185 B 177 B 159 B 130.0 91.0 110.0 87.0 110.0 100.0 80.0 67.0 38.0 26.0 28.0 42.0 34.0 27
Cadmium 2 ND ND ND ND 0.22 J ND 0.34 J ND ND ND ND 0.18 J 0.27 J ND ND ND 0.074 J 0.097 J 0.12 JChromium101.46 J 4.86 JB 1.77 JB 3.80 JB 5.02 JB 0.9 J 1.6 J ND 6.9 B ND 2.4 B 1.2 B ND ND ND ND 0.80 J 0.51 J NDLead153.62 J 8.51 J 5.06 J 3.74 JB 8.24 J 1.7 J 1.7 J 1.4 J 1.80 1.60 1.70 0.82 J 1.10 0.43 J 0.035 J 0.22 J 0.94 J 0.27 J 0.44 J
Mercury 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.019 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Selenium 20 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.80 J ND 0.16 J ND ND ND ND ND
Silver 20 ND 1.99 JB 3.11 JB 1.29 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.12 J ND ND ND ND ND ND NDAcetone60008.25 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 15.00 ND ND ND NDBromoform4NDNDNDND0.18 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Methylene Chloride 5 ND ND 0.560 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/15/08 4/23/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/5/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/2/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16 10/3/16
Well No:MW-16
Arsenic 10 1.86 J ND ND 4.76 JB ND ND ND ND 0.67 J ND 0.41 J ND 0.44 J ND ND ND ND 0.47 J ND
Barium 700 8.81 J 69.8 JB 31.1 JB 28.8 JB 16.3 JB 27.0 19 J 24.0 38.0 33.0 31.0 38.0 48.0 41.0 42.0 35.0 37.0 37.0 58
Cadmium 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.66 J ND ND ND ND 0.14 J 0.037 J ND ND ND 0.053 J 0.11 J 0.059 JChromium10ND3.07 JB 1.87 JB 3.99 JB 2.76 JB 1.0 J 1.5 J ND 8.7 B ND 2.5 B 1.2 B ND ND ND ND 0.83 J 0.63 J NDLead15ND8.15 J ND 4.74 JB ND 1.1 J ND ND 0.66 J 0.41 J 0.55 J 0.55 J 0.97 J 0.49 J 0.49 J 0.37 J 0.56 J 0.71 J 0.57 J
Mercury 1 ND ND 0.114 J ND ND ND ND 0.092 J 0.17 J ND ND ND ND 0.028 J 0.15 J ND 0.46 0.45 ND
Selenium 20 ND ND ND ND 2.9 J ND ND ND 0.48 J 0.97 J 0.69 J 0.24 J ND ND ND ND ND 0.42 J ND
Silver 20 ND 1.66 JB 4.10 JB 1.85 JB 0.86 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDAcetone6000ND2.42 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDBromoform4NDNDNDND1.06 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Dibromochloromethane 0.4 ND ND ND ND 0.25 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Methylene Chloride 5 ND ND 0.560 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
NOTES:
Results in parts per billion (ppb)
ND - Not Detected above the laboratory method detection limit or practical quantitation limit (results prior to April 2007).
NA - Not analyzed for or not available
Values in boldface exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202 groundwater quality standards.
Results for sampling conducted prior to April 2007 as presented in previous GW reports prepared by Withers & Ravenel.
J = Estimated value above laboratory method detection limit and below SWSL or reporting limit.
B = Analyte found in associated field and/or laboratory blank.
Table 3
Historical Summary of Constituent Detections
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase III
Permit # 43-04
Harnett County, North Carolina
Page 2 of 2
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/15/08 4/23/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/5/11 4/27/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/2/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16 10/3/16Well No:MW-17AR*
Arsenic 10 ND ND ND 5.63 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.46 J 0.95 J ND ND ND 0.75 J 5.3Barium70091.7 J 71.9 JB 89.5 JB 56.4 JB 68.6 JB 35.0 41.0 41.0 90.0 30.0 120.0 130.0 110.0 25.0 110.0 150.0 110.0 37.0 39Cadmium2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.24 J 0.17 J 0.086 J ND 0.093 J ND 0.11 J 0.094 J 0.11 J
Chromium 10 1.76 J 2.47 JB ND 3.90 JB 2.58 JB ND 1.6 J ND 4.90 ND 2.6 B 1.2 B ND 2.30 0.32 J 1.10 1.50 2.50 21
Lead 15 ND 5.88 J ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.00 1.30 1.70 1.40 1.50 1.90 2.00 1.90 2.10 1.40 13
Mercury 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDSelenium20NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.76 J 0.72 J 0.51 J ND ND ND ND ND 0.52 J 0.50 JSilver20ND2.26 JB 4.19 JB 1.51 JB 0.84 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.041 J ND ND ND ND ND 0.017 J 0.28 J
Acetone 6000 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0
Bromoform 4 ND ND ND ND 0.27 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Methylene Chloride 5 ND ND 0.450 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDToluene600NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.58 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/15/08 4/23/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/5/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/2/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16 10/3/16
Well No:MW-18
Arsenic 10 4.49 J ND ND 2.22 J ND ND ND ND ND 0.34 J 0.60 J ND 0.37 J 0.51 J ND ND 0.84 J ND 0.70 J
Barium 700 26.3 J 43.1 JB 43.8 JB 48.6 JB 48.4 JB 41.0 41.0 46.0 41.0 40.0 41.0 39.0 57.0 31.0 46.0 43.0 55.0 59.0 20Cadmium2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.23 J ND ND ND ND 0.050 J 0.039 J ND ND 0.081 J 0.11 J 0.062 JChromium10ND2.32 JB 1.25 JB 3.90 JB 3.51 JB ND 1.5 J ND 4.70 ND 2.5 B 1.0 B ND ND ND 0.38 J 0.63 J 0.60 J 3.6
Lead 15 4.04 J 4.07 J ND 6.38 JB ND 0.96 J 2.3 J ND 0.56 J 0.47 J 0.53 J 0.50 J 0.77 J 0.56 J 0.61 J 0.45 J 0.84 J 0.94 J 2.0
Mercury 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.39 0.37 0.029 J 0.26 0.14 J 0.014 J ND ND
Selenium 20 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.67 J 0.75 J 0.92 J ND 0.22 J ND 1.90 4.20 0.79 J NDSilver20ND2.07 JB 3.72 JB 1.69 JB 0.95 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.038 J 0.064 J
60 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.75 ND ND
Methylene Chloride 5 ND ND 0.910 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/23/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/5/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/2/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16 10/3/16
Well No:SW-1(Exp)
Arsenic 10 4.32 J ND ND 1.96 J ND ND ND ND 0.79 J 0.23 J ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.35 J 0.59 J 0.67 J
Barium 700 36.2 J 44.4 JB 17.9 JB 21.7 JB 10.5 JB 12.00 9.5 J 13.00 33.00 21.00 21.00 26.00 43.00 34.00 30.00 43.00 33.00 45.00 28Cadmium2NDNDNDNDNDND0.2 J ND ND 0.31 J ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.049 J 0.10 J 0.049 JChromium101.61 J 1.73 JB ND 2.71 JB 2.58 JB ND 1.3 J ND 8.30 ND 4.7 B 1.4 B ND ND ND ND 0.68 J 0.79 J ND
Lead 15 4.88 J 6.43 J ND 4.49 JB ND 0.76 J ND 0.83 J 7.50 0.95 J 0.44 J ND 1.10 0.27 J 0.35 J ND 0.43 J 1.10 0.39 J
Mercury 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.23 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Selenium 20 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.79 J 1.10 1.00 0.68 J ND 0.22 J ND 1.40 0.86 J 0.36 J 1.2Silver20ND2.53 JB 3.75 JB 1.66 JB 0.98 JB ND ND ND ND 0.22 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.018 J NDStyrene700.260 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
NOTES:
Results in parts per billion (ppb)
ND - Not Detected above the laboratory method detection limit or practical quantitation limit (results prior to April 2007).* - Monitoring well MW-17 was abandoned on August 30, 2011 to make way for landfill expansion
NA - Not analyzed for or not available and was replaced by monitoring well MW-17AR located outside the expansion footprint.
Values in boldface exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202 groundwater quality standards.
Results for sampling conducted prior to April 2007 as presented in previous GW reports prepared by Withers & Ravenel.
J = Estimated value above laboratory method detection limit and below SWSL or reporting limit.
B = Analyte found in associated field and/or laboratory blank.
Table 3 (Continued)
Historical Summary of Constituent Detections
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase III (Planned)
Permit # 43-04
1,2-Dichloroethene
(cis and trans isomers)
Harnett County, North Carolina

11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
APPENDIX A

Groundwater Sampling Forms
EFM E IPMENT CALIBRATION FORM
(:.i:)i (-t i, Proiect#: C C -T/ ,&:_
INSTRUMENT: Y LT- S;-;
SERIAL NO.:
INSTRUMENT:(/l :,,t
SERIAL NO.:
Calibration Recorded Bv 1f{-
rri :ft L Lol#,\'zt/ r ?',-.,
Lot#('zr>a/
/.718 mS Lot# ?/li6(-r, Exp: {/ I 7
Lot# ;-6' ,€--lq.Exp'. f / t
Calibration Recorded Bv f2_
EFM E IPMENT CALIBRATION FORM
Project #:a(lGlient: ,// ori, i ,
INSTRUMENT:'57 3 s(
SERIAL NO.: o 9 6/ ffi-l d3 0(,39o
INSTRUMENT:
SERIAL NO.:
Calibration Recorded
/o"3 t(Lot# i:i t J44
"€;'aa't
Lour.66t-o,'3 : oJ st-/"t/o-3-tl
JO-J /I
Lot#(ity/q, Exp: g !- J/-,t'
Calibration Recorded
Client: NAUTILUS
Project No: CENTRAL
Site Location: CAMERON,
conds: ( ''i^l^- t
Date:
-lolJttoTime: Start C>? t 0 am/pm
Finish olS-f srnTpt
NA TIRE, PERMIT #4304
Water Sample Collection Record
Well/Piezo lD:*1w.'l'i
Well 6f Piezometer E
e. Length of Water Cotumn 7. F 1 6-ny
f. Calculated Well Volume (see back) I . 3
WATER LEVEL DATA:
a. Total Well Length
b. Water Table Depth
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method
Comments
from Top of Casing)
c. Casing Material PVC
d. Casing Diamete r 2"
LOW FLOW
ned (from workplan)b. Acceptance Criteria
- Minimum Required
- Maximum Allowable
- Stabilization of
c. Field Testing Eq
d. Field Testing
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
Have parameters
lf no or N/A -below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION:Method: Peristaltic Pump
Volume (@ _well volumes) _ N/A pumping Rate: i CO milminN/A NTUs----------Td o/o
t Used: Make Model Serial Number
556 ,1 )zrot3cJ-
Calibration Documentation Found on Separate Form
removed
reached
No N/Atrtrrt]ntr
Signature Date _1013 l$
Client; NAUTILUS
Project No: CENTRAL
Conds: i'u rva.-w ?
Date:
-lot-J
t16
Time: Start lc ( l- am/pm
Finish lcS-.o am/pm
4304- ^Ai"\/ 1 2
Qa
Water Sample Collection Record
,rr t Lr,^/ -(
Well *F4 Piezometer I
e. Lengthof WaterOolumn lSl c I (a-O)
f. Calculated Well Volume (see back) ,? " f
WATER LEVEL DATA:
a- Total Well Length
b. Water Table Depth
WELL PURGING DATA
from Top of Casing)
C c. Casing Material PVC
d. Casing Diamete r 2"
LOW FLOW
10 o/o
a. Purge Method
b. Acceptance Criteria
- Minimum Required
- Maximum Allowable rbidity NiA NTUs
(from workplan)
Volume (@ _well volumes) _ N/A Pumping Rate: 4 c C' milmin
- Stabilization of
c. Field Testing Eq Used: Make ModelYSI 556
Serial Numbere9/,:t e 13c,T-
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
removed
reached
No N/AunDNutr
Comments
d. Field Testing nt Calibration Documentation Found on Separate Form
e. Acceptance criteria YesE-&,+Have parameters
lfnoorN/A-E below
SAMPLE COLLECTION:Method: Peristaltic Pump
Signature
Client NAUTILUS
Project No: CENTRAL
Site Location: CAMERON
ther Conds: -.fvrvN
Date: _ tol.3 lt6
Time: Start [too amipm
Finish ['z i 5-- amipm
\/La/':_
TIRE. PERMIT #4304
4304- t\:la r.\
WATER LEVEL DATA:
a. Total Well Length
b. Water Table Depth
WELL PURGING DATA
Comments l1c
c. Casing Material PVC
d. Casing Diamete r 2"
LOW FLOW
.Qt v
nd Water Sample Collection Record
from Top of Gasing)
ID:/i\(/,/ - I :
Well tr Piezometer I
e. Length of Water Column ( 3-.- f o 1a-n;
f. Calculated Well Volume (see back) -3 . t:
Serial Number
a. Purge Method
b. Acceptance Criteria
- Minimum Required
- Maximum Allowable urbidity N/A NTUs
- Stabilization of 10 o/o
c. Field Testing Used: Make Model
d. Field Testing
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume removed
Has required been reached
Have parameters
lfnoorN/A-E below
SAMPLE GOLLECTION:Peristaltic Pump
(from workplan)
Volume (@ _ well volumes) _ N/A Pumping Rate: 1 o e, ml/min.
YSI 556 c..^l [ lc: ( :j a.l.'
Calibration Documentation Found on Separate Form
No N/Aunnt]Nt]
Yes
#d-
Signature -;=Date _ 10/-tr /16
Client: NAUTILUS
Project No: CENTRAL
Location: CAMERON,
Date: _ 1Ol-3 /16
1;ms; Start i-2: { srnTprn
Finish t3 3C amlpm
Volume
Removed ml
lG.Cr(:
tr'\h '' {1
nd Water Sample Gollection Record
WATER LEVEL DATA:
a. Total Well Length
b. Water Table Depth
WELL PURGING DATA
from Top of Casing)
c. Casing Material PVC
d. Casing Diamete r 2"
LOW FLOW
ned (from workplan)
removed
reached
1r, V
Q.
Well .S piezometer fl
e. Leni;th of Water Cotumn : :J 7 \ 1a-01
f. Calculated Well Volume (see back) .{ " 3
a. Purge Method
b. Acceptance Criteria
- Minimum Required
- Maximum Allowable idity N/A NTUs"s 10%- Stabilization of
c. Field Testing Used: Make ModelYSt 556
d. Field Testing Eq t Calibration Documentation Found on Separate Form
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume
Has required
Have parameters
lf no or N/A -below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION:Method: Peristaltic Pump
Comments
Yesa
-@--w
Volume (@ _ weil volumes) _ N/A Pumping *r," 'ZC C milmin.
Serial Number
c''i /,:-r e/ 3 cJ'
No N/Anntrtrntr
YutrJ f/ta
Signature
Q nt-,
Date _flJ trc
r' F lt'r'
Client: NAUTILUS
Project No: CENTRAL
Location: CAMERON,
condt' -f .*t-' ,'-'
Dale: - rc] 7, 116
Time: Start i3ir7 am/pm
p1n;s6 lTFlamipm
4
INA TIRE, PERMIT #4304
nd Water Sample Collection Record
wXur/ l,*
Well $- Piezometer ITe. Lengjtn of Water Column '\ . L t,
from Top of Casing)
9 c. Casing Material PVC
d. Casing Diamete t 2"f. Calculated Well Volume (see back) /
LOW FLOW
lized
in below
Method: Peristaltic Pump
WATER LEVEL DATA:
a. Total Well Length
b. Water Table Depth
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method
(a-b)
(-
b. Acceptance Criteria (efined (from workplan)
- Minimum Required f urge Volume (@ _ well volumes)N/A Pumping nate i 7C mtlmin
- Maximum Allowable]Turbidity N/A NTUs
- Stabilization of Dararneters --------7d vo
d. Field Testing Calibration Documentation Found on Separate Form
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume removed
Has required been reached
Yes No N/Afrtr!Ent]EntrHave parameters
lf no or N/A -
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
V
Date: 10/ 'j /16
Time: Start I Y"9f "t/ptFinish l51fO amipm
Client NAUTILUS
Location: CAME
WeatherConds: \'ursr-.i Collecto(s) -\l-;
WATER LEVEL DATA:
a. Total Well Length
b. Water Table Depth
WELL PURGING DATA
c. Casing Material PVC
d. Casing Diamete r 2"
LOW FLOW
44
nd Water Sample Collection Record
from Top of Casing)Well tr
7yt1i,t/ - i \
Piezometer I
e. Length of WaterColumn t 6 ...2'7 ta-O)
f. Calculated Well Volume (see back) e -1
Serial Number,)kr<:t.7cJ-
a. Purge Method
b. Acceptance Criteria
- Minimum Required
- Maximum Allowable Turbidity N/A NTUsneters 10 %- Stabilization of
c. Field Testing Used:Make
(from workplan)
Volume (@ _ well volumes) _ N/A PumpingRate: / e C milmin.
d. Field Testing E Calibration Documentation Found on Separate Form
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume removed
Has required been reached
Have parameters
lfnoorN/A-E
SAMPLE COLLECTION:Method: Peristaltic Pump
Comments
No N/AntrtrnNt]
Yes+w.w
Signature Date fit3 nG
No: CENTRAL
Location: CAMERON
Weather Condst J;,*iv
INA TIRE, PERMIT #4304
Date: _10/-? /i6
Time: Start r'{.c'l am/pm----=a-Finish I {-S C' am/pm
Collector(s) {E/a--
AL<-t.-{ I
Gro nd Water Sample Collection Record
WATER LEVEL DATA: {
a. Total Well Length
b. Water Table Depth
from Top of Casing)
c. Casing Material PVC
d. Casing Diamete r 2"
removed
reached
Well d= Piezometer I
e. te/gtn of Water Cotumn 1- ? j
1"-01
f. Calculated Well Volume (see back) t , 4
t'-
1
2t
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method LOW FLOW
b. Acceptance Criteria
- Minimum Required
- Maximum Allowable
- Stabilization of
c. Field Testing
d. Field Testing Eq
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume
Has required
Have parameters
lf no or N/A -below
SAMPLE COLLEGTION:
Comments
(from workplan)
Volume (@ _ well volumes) _ N/A Pumping Rate: ,C,C' mt/min.ity N/A NTUs
1A Yo
Used: Make Model Serial Number
No N/Annutrntr
YSI 556 C'il.-rcl!cJ-
t Calibration Oo"rr"n,"t,offi
Yes6&p
Method: Peristaltic Pump
Signature Date _tot3 n6
Client: NAUTILUS
iect No: CENTRAL
Site Location: CAMERON
WeatherConds: f! l:' *t,r,t
Dale:
- 1Ol 'a 116
Time: Start ('? O -< amtpm
rinish llcfb am/pm
INA TIRE, PERMIT #4304
4304- ft,l tlv ( A
WATER LEVEL DATA:
a. Total Well Length
b. Water Table Depth
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method
te
nd Water Sample Collection Record
from Top of Casing)
c. Casing Material PVC
d. Casing Diamete r 2"
LOW FLOW
L'\',-(c
*".u w Piezometer I
e. Len$th of Water Column lT'eN 6-o1
f. Calculated Well Volume (see back) ,Q . \
Pumping Rate: /6 C) mymin
Serial Number
b. Acceptance Criteria
- Minimum Required
- Maximum Allowable
- Stabilization of
c. Field Testing
rge Volume (@ _well volumes)
--
N/Aurbidity NIA NTUsrters 10 To
Make
c'lA
556-TtYSI
d. Field Testing
e. Acceptance crlteria
Has required volume removed
Has required been reached
Have parameters
lf no or N/A -below
SAMPLE GOLLECTION:
Comments
Calibration Documentation Found on Separate Form
Yes.A
@w
Method: Peristaltic Pump
No N/Autrnnntr
Signature -4t Date _ 1Ol.? 116

11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
APPENDIX B

Laboratory Reports
And
Chain-of-Custody Records

Page 1 of 59
Page 2 of 59
Page 3 of 59
Page 4 of 59
Page 5 of 59
Page 24 of 59
Page 25 of 59
Page 26 of 59
Page 27 of 59
Page 28 of 59
Page 29 of 59
Page 30 of 59
Page 31 of 59
Page 32 of 59
Page 33 of 59
Page 34 of 59
Page 35 of 59
Page 36 of 59
Page 37 of 59
Page 38 of 59
Page 39 of 59
Page 40 of 59
Page 41 of 59
Page 42 of 59
Page 43 of 59
Page 44 of 59
Page 45 of 59
Page 46 of 59
Page 47 of 59
Page 48 of 59
Page 49 of 59
Page 50 of 59
Page 51 of 59
Page 52 of 59
Page 53 of 59
Page 54 of 59
Page 55 of 59
Page 56 of 59
Page 57 of 59
Page 58 of 59
Page 59 of 59