Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7906_Duke_DanRiver_Attach1ClosGuid_DIN26814_20161011  _____________________________________________________________________________________  1 The steps or methodology for calculating SSLs for contaminant migration to groundwater were developed to identify chemical concentrations in soil with the potential to migrate and contaminate groundwater. SSLs protective of groundwater are calculated with a soil leachate model using default values from the 2L groundwater standard or the 2L groundwater interim maximum allowable concentration (IMAC) as target groundwater concentrations and take into consideration fate and transport parameters.   Page 1 of 5  Attachment 1 Coal Combustion Residuals Surface Impoundment Closure Guidelines for Protection of Groundwater The overall objective of these guidelines is to address remediation of discharges or releases of contaminants into soil and groundwater resulting from Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) disposal to cleanup levels that meet Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code Subchapter 02L standards (2L Standards):  For groundwater, the cleanup level is the site-specific background concentration or the 2L Standards.  For soil, the cleanup level is either the site-specific background concentration or the lowest soil screening level (SSL) protective of groundwater. Protection of groundwater criteria dictates groundwater and soil remediation goals in the closure process. Either Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) identified using North Carolina’s Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ)’s Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) SSLs,1 or site-specific background concentrations in soil will be used to identify soil remediation goals that are protective of groundwater quality. Any wastes encountered that are not associated with CCR will be addressed by applicable DEQ Division of Waste Management (DWM) program guidance. Excavation Soil Sampling Plan Sampling and analyses of soil collected during excavation of a CCR Impoundment is needed in order to develop soil remediation goals and corresponding cleanup levels. The responsible party may need to prescribe additional sampling and analysis based on site-specific conditions. A stand-alone Excavation Soil Sampling Plan (Plan) generated for closure of a CCR surface impoundment shall be developed to ensure the proposed excavation design is comprehensive enough in scope to meet the performance standards for closure. This Plan shall be submitted to DEQ as part of an Excavation Plan, with the sample analytical results and modeling that incorporate the data provided as part of the final overall closure plan for approval, as dictated by §130A-309.214. CCR Excavation Determination CCR excavation will be considered complete based on a visual confirmation that all CCR and co- mingled CCR/soil has been removed. The extent of co-mingled CCR/soil will be based on sampling of the material and analysis under Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). Soil samples will   Page 2 of 5    be examined utilizing methods outlined in American Standards for Testing and Measures (ASTM) D2488, Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedure). Vertical and horizontal excavation of CCR can terminate when the remaining material can be documented using PLM to contain less than 50% CCR. Visual confirmation sampling of CCR will be performed on a 100-foot grid system. The soil sample will be performed on an acre grid system and should be collected by advancing a boring using a hand-auger or from a test pit at a minimum depth of 2 feet below ground surface unless refusal, bedrock, or the water table are encountered. The sample should be analyzed using PLM and excavation of the CCR will be considered complete when the sample contains less than 50% CCR. If possible, excavation of CCR material should continue even if groundwater is encountered. If complete excavation of the CCR and co-mingled CCR/soil (greater than 50% CCR) is not able to be completed, documentation of site conditions or other restricting factors shall be presented to the DEQ. Soil Sampling and Analysis Sampling of the remaining soils (containing less than 50% CCR) will be necessary to evaluate the extent of contamination depending on the depth of water table and any proposed institutional or engineering controls that may be used in the area of excavation. Soil sampling will not be required if refusal or the top of bedrock are encountered, or the remaining soils are below the water table. Soil samples for laboratory analysis must be collected in a manner that will ensure a relatively uniform distribution of particles throughout the 6-inch sample. The systematic approach and design for soil sampling and analysis is dependent upon two scenarios:  Scenario 1: Remaining soil (containing less than 50% CCR) is located above the seasonal high water table and final constructed institutional and/or engineering controls will restrict infiltration from the surface reaching the water table (e.g. installation of a liner system).  Scenario 2: Remaining soil (containing less than 50% CCR) is located above the seasonal high water table and infiltration from the surface would continue to reach the water table. Scenario 1. Confirmation sampling will include discrete surface samples collected from the first 6 inches of the soil. Sampling will be performed on an acre grid system. This sample collection methodology shall be sufficient to characterize the horizontal extent of any remaining soil contamination for comparison with the PSRG. The samples shall be analyzed by a North Carolina certified lab for total concentrations of the following parameters: Antimony, Aluminum, Arsenic, Barium, Beryllium, Boron, Cadmium, Calcium, Chloride, Chromium (total and hexavalent), Cobalt, Copper, Iron, Lead, Magnesium, Manganese, Mercury, Molybdenum, Nickel, Nitrate as Nitrogen, pH, Potassium, Selenium, Silver, Sodium, Strontium, Sulfate, Thallium, Vanadium, and Zinc.     Page 3 of 5  Scenario 2. Confirmation sampling will include collection of both discrete surface and subsurface soil samples performed on an acre grid system. Discrete surface samples will be collected from the first 6 inches of the soil and a subsurface soil sample will be collected from a 6-inch discrete interval at a minimum depth of 2-feet below the surface soil sample depth interval unless refusal, bedrock, or the water table are encountered. This sample collection methodology shall be sufficient to characterize both the horizontal and vertical extent of any remaining soil contamination for comparison with the PSRG and/or input into the soil leachate model. The samples shall be analyzed by a North Carolina certified lab for both total concentrations and by the Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure (SPLP) of the following parameters: Antimony, Aluminum, Arsenic, Barium, Beryllium, Boron, Cadmium, Calcium, Chloride, Chromium (total and hexavalent), Cobalt, Copper, Iron, Lead, Magnesium, Manganese, Mercury, Molybdenum, Nickel, Nitrate as Nitrogen, pH, Potassium, Selenium, Silver, Sodium, Strontium, Sulfate, Thallium, Vanadium, and Zinc. Characterization and Management of Non-Ash Material If non-ash materials are discovered during ash removal activities, work in that area will be stopped, temporarily relocated to another area, and the Duke Energy environmental team will be contacted to perform the appropriate assessment(s) to determine the nature and the extent of the non-ash related impacts. Depending upon the material encountered, the area will either be delineated and segregated for profiling and proper disposal, or placed directly into roll-off containers for proper disposal. Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) crews will be mobilized to the site to perform the excavation activities if hazardous materials are encountered. The appropriate DEQ Division of Water Resources Regional Office or the DWM will be contacted if these areas are discovered and the plan for proper removal and disposal will be discussed. Non- ash related areas will be documented on excavation drawings and information recorded will include, but not be limited to, the material encountered, the dimensions with coordinates of the excavated area, the health and safety protocols used to protect human health and the environment during the execution of these activities, a summary of the sample and confirmation analytical results, and copies of the appropriate manifests. Determination of Site-Specific Soil Remediation Goals and Cleanup Levels Protection of groundwater soil remediation goals can be identified by following specific instruction found in DWM remediation guidance (referred to below). Only requirements for remediation goals that involve protection of groundwater criteria will be considered. Risk-based or health-based remediation goals for unrestricted land use will not be considered for closure performance standards. The DWM IHSB guidance documents that contain direction for establishing remediation goals include:     Page 4 of 5   Inactive Hazardous Sites Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=32af7da0-d350-4392-8a87- 201f94b2eedc&groupId=38361 and  Registered Environmental Consultant (REC) Program Implementation Guidance: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=3049dcfb-b0cf-4ebf-8459- 5018415fb6a3&groupId=38361 Site-specific soil remediation goals are identified by:  Identifying PSRGs that relate to the SSLs that meet the protection of groundwater criteria for a specific constituent, and  Determining site-specific background concentrations in soil. The procedure for identifying PSRG that meets protection of groundwater criteria and the corresponding SSL involves the following:  Screening Values. The screening values that relate to SSLs protective of groundwater are shown in the PSRG Table located at: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=13ccab00-3c6a-48c5-abe4- 41b96d7ea6cb&groupId=38361.  PSRG table. This contains a column with soil remediation goals titled “Protection of Groundwater PSRG” that should be used in evaluating soil-to-groundwater values that meet and are protective of 2L standards. The values in this table for the respective constituents are the SSLs, which are the contaminant-specific soil remediation goals that are the cleanup levels for site closure. Note that the DWM updates this table during the first and third quarter of each calendar year.  Transport Model. A transport model is included in the PSRG table for calculating other SSLs not specifically listed in the table in order to meet protection of groundwater criteria. 15A NCAC 2L .0202 (c) does specify substances that are not permitted in groundwater and indicates that even those which are not specifically listed in the rule are not allowed above the PQL, unless they are naturally occurring. The approved laboratory method PQL for the substance can be used in the equation if there is no specifically listed 2L standard.  Background Concentrations. Background concentrations of naturally occurring metals in soil at a site can be established using US Environmental Protection Agency guidance for comparing background and chemical concentrations in soil: http://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6931 Groundwater Modeling Contingency for stabilization of remaining amounts of contaminated soil in a manner that will meet the intent of the 2L Rules and closure requirements shall be considered as site conditions dictate. Provisions to develop groundwater flow and transport models to evaluate protection of groundwater criteria if some soil contamination is left in place shall be considered. In addition, the possibility of metals leaching into soils from a potential change in pH and geochemical conditions related to dewatering and excavation shall be considered along with plans for groundwater models to assess resulting site conditions.     Page 5 of 5  References American Standards for Testing and Measures Standard D D2488-09a Standard Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedure), 2009. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Waste Management – Superfund Section – Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch, Inactive Hazardous Sites Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup, November 2014, https://ncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs- public/Waste%20Management/DWM/SF/IHS/guidance/IHSB%20GUIDANCE%20Assessment %20and%20Remediation%20saved%202-9-2016.pdf. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Waste Management – Superfund Section – Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch, Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRG) Table, http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=13ccab00-3c6a-48c5-abe4- 41b96d7ea6cb&groupId=38361 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Waste Management – Superfund Section – Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch, Registered Environmental Consultant Program Implementation Guidance, November 2014, http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=3049dcfb-b0cf-4ebf-8459- 5018415fb6a3&groupId=38361 North Carolina Administrative Code Title 15A Subchapter 2L Section .0100, .0200, .0300, Classifications and Water Quality Standards Applicable to the Groundwaters of North Carolina. April 1, 2013. http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=1aa3fa13-2c0f-45b7- ae96-5427fb1d25b4&groupId=38364 US Environmental Protection Agency. Guidance for Comparing Background and Chemical Concentrations in Soil for CERCLA Sites, EPA 540-R-01-003OSWER 9285.7-41, September 2002. http://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6931. US Environmental Protection Agency. Final Rule for Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities. 80 FR 21301. 40 CFR Parts 257 and 261. April 17, 2015. https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2015/04/17/2015-00257/hazardous-and-solid-waste- management-system-disposal-of-coal-combustion-residuals-from-electric