The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1102_BASF_INDUS_1stSemiGWMReport_DIN26782_20160728 Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report Former BASF Industrial Landfill Facility Permit No. 11-02 US Highway 19/23 Enka, Buncombe County, North Carolina Prepared for: BASF Corporation Florham Park, New Jersey Prepared by: ELM Site Solutions, Inc. Raleigh, North Carolina (919) 792-3733 July 2016 ELM Site Solutions, Inc. P. O. Box 97607 Raleigh, North Carolina 27624 (919) 792-3733 1 July 28, 2016 Submitted via Electronic Mail Ms. Jaclynne Drummond Compliance Hydrogeologist North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Waste Management - Solid Waste Section 2090 US Highway 70 Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778 Subject: Semi-Annual Monitoring Report BASF Former Industrial Landfill Facility Permit # 11-02 Enka, North Carolina Dear Ms. Drummond: ELM Site Solutions, Inc., on behalf of BASF Corporation, herein submits an electronic copy of the semi-annual sampling report for the above-referenced site. This letter report presents results of semi-annual sampling activities conducted on April 14, 2016, which constitutes the first semi-annual sampling event for 2016. The approved groundwater monitoring network consists of MW-3, MW-4R, MW-5 and background well MW-6. The monitoring network also includes surface water sample locations SW-1 and DW-2 from Hominy Creek. In a letter dated November 4, 2010, the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) – Solid Waste Section requested the collection of an additional surface water sample from a seep area in conjunction with the semi-annual groundwater sampling events for a minimum of five (5) years. Sampling results for the monitoring wells, surface water samples and surface seep (Seep-1) are discussed below. In addition to the samples outlined above, 10 landfill gas monitoring wells (LG-1 through LG-10) were installed at the site in May 2010. Landfill gas quarterly monitoring events were conducted on December 1, 2015; March 15, 2016; and June 29, 2016 during this reporting period. Gas monitoring results are also discussed below. A completed Environmental Monitoring Report Form follows this letter report. Ms. Jaclynne Drummond July 28, 2016 2 FIELD ACTIVITIES Field Investigation methods for this groundwater monitoring event were conducted in compliance with industry standards and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region IV Field Branch’s Quality System and Technical Procedures. Groundwater samples from the site were collected on April 14, 2016 using ‘low-flow’ techniques with either a peristaltic pump (MW-3, MW-4R and MW-5) or a Geotech stainless steel submersible Geosub pump (MW-6). Water levels were measured at each well prior to sampling using a Testwell water level meter (Table 1). Groundwater elevations were used to construct potentiometric contours for this sampling event (Figure 1). Purging was accomplished by using a variable speed peristaltic or submersible pump with the pumping rate adjustable to equal the approximate recharge rate of the well. Indicator parameters of pH, temperature, specific conductance and turbidity were measured regularly during purging with an YSI 6920 water quality meter until the measured values stabilized. This ‘low-flow’ method targets the collection of groundwater samples that have the least total suspended solid count obtainable without filtering in the field, thus giving a more accurate indication of dissolved constituents present in the aquifer. Sample collection record sheets are provided in Appendix A. Surface water samples were collected directly from Hominy Creek by filling pre-preserved laboratory sample containers. The seep sample (Seep-1) was collected from a 4-inch pipe located at the base of the seep area. Sample locations are shown on Figure 2. Water quality parameters for the monitoring wells, surface water locations and seep at the time of sampling are presented in Table 2. As noted above, 10 landfill gas monitoring wells were sampled on December 1, 2015, March 15, 2016 and June 29, 2016. Well locations are presented on Figure 3. Percent lower explosive limit (% LEL) measurements and other applicable parameters (i.e., % methane by volume, % oxygen and % carbon dioxide) were recorded at the landfill gas monitoring wells using a laboratory calibrated Landtec GEM 2000 instrument. Sample collection record sheets are provided in Appendix A. SAMPLING RESULTS Environmental Conservation Laboratories, Inc. in Cary, North Carolina analyzed the groundwater and surface water samples for Appendix I volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260B, Appendix I metals by EPA Methods 6010C/6020A, mercury by EPA Method 7470A, sulfate by EPA Method 300.0 and total dissolved solids by SM 2540C. The surface seep sample was analyzed for Appendix I VOCs. A copy of the analytical data is presented in Appendix B. For data analysis, groundwater monitoring well results were compared to 15A NCAC 2L Groundwater Standards, the regulatory basis established to determine groundwater quality. Surface water results were compared to 15A NCAC 2B Surface Water Standards. Monitoring wells had one or more inorganic analyte concentrations that exceeded their respective groundwater standards. No analyte concentrations detected in the surface water samples exceeded their respective standards. Detections are discussed below. Analytical results are summarized in Table 3. Ms. Jaclynne Drummond July 28, 2016 3 No organic constituents were detected above laboratory method reporting limits in any of the groundwater or surface water samples during the April 2016 monitoring event. For inorganic constituents, barium, cobalt, nickel, sulfate and vanadium were detected in groundwater monitoring wells and/or surface water samples above laboratory method reporting limits. All of the barium and nickel concentrations were below their respective 15A NCAC 2L Groundwater Standard or 15A NCAC 2B Surface Water Standard. Cobalt was detected in three (3) monitoring wells (MW-3, MW-5 and MW-6 (background well)) at concentrations which exceeded its 15A NCAC 2L Groundwater Standard. Sulfate was detected in one (1) monitoring well (MW-5) at a concentration which exceeded its 15A NCAC 2L Groundwater Standard. Vanadium was detected in one (1) monitoring well (MW-3) at a concentration which exceeded its 15A NCAC 2L Groundwater Standard. As noted above, quarterly landfill gas monitoring events were conducted on December 1, 2015, March 15, 2016 and June 29, 2016 for 10 landfill gas wells located near the waste boundary during the reporting period. All gas wells exhibited 0% LEL through the reporting period. Current and historical landfill gas sampling data are summarized in Table 4. The following summarizes results obtained during this reporting period: • No organic compounds were detected in site groundwater monitoring wells or surface water sample locations at concentrations above reporting limits. • Cobalt was detected in three (3) groundwater monitoring wells (MW-3, MW-5 and MW-6 (background well)) at concentrations that exceeded the 15A NCAC 2L Groundwater Standard of 1 ug/L. It should be noted that background soil samples were collected during the initial seep investigation (2010) to assess naturally occurring site conditions. Results from the study included detection of cobalt at a maximum concentration of 9.34 milligrams per kilogram (mg/Kg). The NCDEQ - Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) has established a soil cleanup level protective of groundwater for cobalt at 0.9 mg/Kg. Oxidation Reduction Potential (ORP) measurements in the three (3) monitoring wells listed above indicated the presence of a reducing environment potentially mobilizing background metals from soils. Some, if not all, of the cobalt detected during monitoring may be due to mobilization of background metals from soil. • Sulfate was detected in one (1) monitoring well (MW-5) at a concentration that exceeded its 15A NCAC 2L Groundwater Standard of 250 ug/L. The sample result was 270 ug/L. • Vanadium was detected in one (1) monitoring well (MW-3) at a concentration that exceeded its 15A NCAC 2L Groundwater Standard of 0.3 ug/L. The sample result was 1.03 ug/L. • No inorganic element concentrations detected in surface water exceeded their respective 15A NCAC 2B Standards (where a standard has been established) during this monitoring event. Sulfate was detected in surface water but a 15A NCAC 2B standard has not been established for this constituent. • All gas wells exhibited 0% LEL through the reporting period, which is consistent with historical monitoring. Ms. Jaclynne Drummond July 28, 2016 4 If you have any questions or require any further information, please call Jeremy Odom at (704) 770-1481 or me at (919) 792-3733. Sincerely, ELM Site Solutions, Inc. Rusty Norris, PE, PLS, RSM Senior Engineer TABLES Table 1 Water Level Measurements Semi-Annual Sampling Event April 14, 2016 BASF Landfill Enka, North Carolina Page 1 of 1 Table 1 Facility Permit No.Well Identification Date Total Depth (feet) Screen Interval (feet) Top of Casing (Feet AMSL) Depth to Groundwater (Feet BTOC) Groundwater Elevation (Feet AMSL) 11-02 MW-3 4/14/2016 30.16 18-28 2056.44 6.53 2049.91 11-02 MW-4R 4/14/2016 34.92 23-33 2082.67 26.17 2056.50 11-02 MW-5 4/14/2016 19.35 6-16 2057.62 7.72 2049.90 11-02 MW-6 4/14/2016 41.35 28-38 2114.84 38.55 2076.29 NOTES: AMSL - Above Mean Sea Level (Vertical Control NAVD 88) Table 2 General Groundwater Quality Parameters Semi-Annual Sampling Event April 14, 2016 BASF Landfill Enka, North Carolina Page 1 of 1 Table 2 Facility Permit No.Well Identification Date pH Temp (oC) Conductivity (µs/cm) Turbidity (NTU) Oxidation Reduction Potential (mV) DO (mg/L) TDS (mg/L) 11-02 MW-3 4/14/2016 7.11 14.43 2.925 0.5 -82.8 1.19 2100 11-02 MW-4R 4/14/2016 5.87 15.69 0.136 0.4 139.5 6.82 70 11-02 MW-5 4/14/2016 6.27 13.72 1.075 1.4 -20.2 1.14 760 11-02 MW-6 4/14/2016 5.86 13.91 0.052 8.1 184.0 0.97 220 11-02 SW-1 4/14/2016 6.98 13.36 0.047 4.6 137.6 10.35 BRL 11-02 DW-2 4/14/2016 6.98 12.95 0.053 7.0 126.3 10.31 BRL 11-02 Seep-1 4/14/2016 6.72 13.04 1.179 5.1 -38.3 0.91 NM NOTES: DO - Dissolved Oxygen ORP - Oxidation-Reduction Potential TDS - reported in milligrams per liter (mg/L).NM - Not measured BRL - Below reporting limit Table 3 Groundwater Analytical Results Semi-Annual Sampling Event April 14, 2016BASF Landfill Enka, North Carolina Page 1 of 1 Table 3 Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Copper Lead Mercury Nickel Selenium Silver Sulfate Thallium Vanadium Zincug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L mg/L ug/L ug/L ug/L 1 10 700 4 2 10 1 1000 15 1 100 20 20 250 0.2*0.3*1000 MW-3 4/14/2016 BRL BRL 207 BRL BRL BRL 24.3 BRL BRL BRL 29.2 BRL BRL 54 BRL 1.03 BRL DUP (MW-3)4/14/2016 BRL BRL 210 BRL BRL BRL 25.3 BRL BRL BRL 29.5 BRL BRL 53 BRL 1.03 BRL MW-4R 4/14/2016 BRL BRL 75.8 BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL 23 BRL BRL BRL MW-5 4/14/2016 BRL BRL 180 BRL BRL BRL 18.4 BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL 270 BRL BRL BRL MW-6 4/14/2016 BRL BRL 68.5 BRL BRL BRL 5.8 BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL 84 BRL BRL BRL 640 10 200,000 6.5 2 50 4 7 25 0.012 88 5 0.06 NS NS NS 50 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L mg/L ug/L ug/L ug/L SW-1 4/14/2016 BRL BRL 25.1 BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL DW-2 4/14/2016 BRL BRL 23.8 BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL 5.3 BRL BRL BRL Seep-1 4/14/2016 NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM Notes:No organic compounds were detected during this sampling event.ug/L - micrograms per liter or parts per billion (ppb)mg/L - milligrams per liter or parts per million (ppm)1.3 Non-estimated concentrations that exceed North Carolina 2L Groundwater Standards (April 2013) or NC 2B Surface Water Standards (May 2007) * - Groundwater Protection StandardBRL - Below Laboratory Reporting Limit or Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL)NS - No StandardD - The sample was analyzed at dilution.B - The analyte was detected in the associated method blank.NM - Not measured . Units 15A NCAC 2B Standard Monitoring Well and Surface Water I.D.Sample Date 15A NCAC 2L Standard Units Table 4 Landfill Gas Sampling Data BASF Enka Landfill Enka, North Carolina LFG SAMPLE Sample Sample Tube Time % CH4WELL ID DATE Time Purge Pumped By Volume 12/13/2010 1124 >60s >60s 0 0 17.0 4.8 LG-1 3/11/2011 1335 >60s >60s 0 0 18.2 3.8 6/3/2011 1100 >60s >60s 0 0 17.0 3.4 10/12/2011 1130 >60s >60s 0 0 16.8 3.812/14/2011 1300 >60s >60s 0 0 17.0 3.7 3/8/2012 1200 >60s >60s 0 0 17.3 3.66/14/2012 1115 >60s >60s 0 0 17.0 3.8 9/26/2012 1200 >60s >60s 0 0 17.2 3.612/3/2012 1200 >60s >60s 0 0 18.3 3.9 3/27/2013 1200 >60s >60s 0 0 18.0 3.46/3/2013 1300 >60s >60s 0 0 15.3 3.09/17/2013 1130 >60s >60s 0 0 14.5 7.2 12/11/2013 1200 >60s >60s 0 0 15.3 5.73/13/2014 1200 >60s >60s 0 0 18.2 3.2 6/5/2014 1230 >60s >60s 0 0 15.6 4.29/30/2014 1130 >60s >60s 0 0 14.4 5.5 12/19/2014 1100 >60s >60s 0 0 14.8 5.13/17/2015 1130 >60s >60s 0 0 16.8 4.3 6/19/2015 1215 >60s >60s 0 0 17.1 3.99/14/2015 1400 >60s >60s 0 0 18.2 3.112/1/2015 1130 >60s >60s 0 0 15.5 5.5 3/15/2016 1200 >60s >60s 0 0 15.7 2.66/29/2016 1200 >60s >60s 0 0 16.9 4.2 12/13/2010 1131 >60s >60s 0 0 18.9 2.2LG-2 3/11/2011 1345 >60s >60s 0 0 20.4 0.9 6/3/2011 1130 >60s >60s 0 0 19.5 2.3 10/12/2011 1145 >60s >60s 0 0 18.1 2.4 12/14/2011 1330 >60s >60s 0 0 18.6 2.2 3/8/2012 1145 >60s >60s 0 0 19.3 1.86/14/2012 1130 >60s >60s 0 0 18.5 2.4 9/26/2012 1215 >60s >60s 0 0 18.8 2.212/3/2012 1230 >60s >60s 0 0 19.2 2.0 3/27/2013 1230 >60s >60s 0 0 19.6 2.56/3/2013 1315 >60s >60s 0 0 16.8 3.3 9/17/2013 1140 >60s >60s 0 0 17.5 3.712/11/2013 1215 >60s >60s 0 0 17.3 3.23/13/2014 1230 >60s >60s 0 0 19.3 2.7 6/5/2014 1245 >60s >60s 0 0 17.0 3.09/30/2014 1145 >60s >60s 0 0 16.7 3.9 12/19/2014 1115 >60s >60s 0 0 16.9 3.53/17/2015 1140 >60s >60s 0 0 17.1 2.9 6/19/2015 1230 >60s >60s 0 0 18.1 2.89/14/2015 1415 >60s >60s 0 0 19.6 0.8 12/1/2015 1145 >60s >60s 0 0 17.1 3.43/15/2016 1230 >60s >60s 0 0 18.6 1.36/29/2016 1230 >60s >60s 0 0 18.5 2.4 % LEL % O2 % CO2 Table 4 Landfill Gas Sampling Data BASF Enka Landfill Enka, North Carolina LFG SAMPLE Sample Sample Tube Time % CH4WELL ID DATE Time Purge Pumped By Volume % LEL % O2 % CO2 12/13/2010 1136 >60s >60s 0 0 18.6 3.2 LG-3 3/11/2011 1400 >60s >60s 0 0 19.7 2.1 6/3/2011 1200 >60s >60s 0 0 17.4 3.4 10/12/2011 1200 >60s >60s 0 0 17.8 3.012/14/2011 1345 >60s >60s 0 0 18.0 2.9 3/8/2012 1230 >60s >60s 0 0 18.4 2.86/14/2012 1200 >60s >60s 0 0 18.8 2.5 9/26/2012 1230 >60s >60s 0 0 18.6 2.712/3/2012 1245 >60s >60s 0 0 18.9 2.9 3/27/2013 1245 >60s >60s 0 0 20.4 2.46/3/2013 1230 >60s >60s 0 0 16.8 3.29/17/2013 1150 >60s >60s 0 0 17.4 3.8 12/11/2013 1230 >60s >60s 0 0 17.5 3.73/13/2014 1300 >60s >60s 0 0 20.1 2.5 6/5/2014 1300 >60s >60s 0 0 17.7 3.19/30/2014 1200 >60s >60s 0 0 16.9 3.5 12/19/2014 1145 >60s >60s 0 0 16.5 4.03/17/2015 1150 >60s >60s 0 0 18.5 2.6 6/19/2015 1245 >60s >60s 0 0 17.5 3.39/14/2015 1430 >60s >60s 0 0 18.2 2.512/1/2015 1200 >60s >60s 0 0 17.5 3.6 3/15/2016 1245 >60s >60s 0 0 16.7 2.96/29/2016 1245 >60s >60s 0 0 17.9 3.1 12/13/2010 1143 >60s >60s 0 0 16.6 5.5LG-4 3/11/2011 1415 >60s >60s 0 0 18.8 2.8 6/3/2011 1230 >60s >60s 0 0 17.8 3.2 10/12/2011 1230 >60s >60s 0 0 14.1 5.4 12/14/2011 1400 >60s >60s 0 0 13.9 5.3 3/8/2012 1245 >60s >60s 0 0 16.8 4.26/14/2012 1215 >60s >60s 0 0 16.4 4.4 9/26/2012 1245 >60s >60s 0 0 16.5 4.612/3/2012 1300 >60s >60s 0 0 15.5 5.9 3/27/2013 1300 >60s >60s 0 0 19.9 3.26/3/2013 1430 >60s >60s 0 0 16.0 4.2 9/17/2013 1200 >60s >60s 0 0 12.9 6.412/11/2013 1245 >60s >60s 0 0 15.4 5.73/13/2014 1330 >60s >60s 0 0 19.7 3.3 6/5/2014 1330 >60s >60s 0 0 14.7 4.29/30/2014 1230 >60s >60s 0 0 13.9 5.4 12/19/2014 1230 >60s >60s 0 0 14.1 5.23/17/2015 1200 >60s >60s 0 0 18.4 3.3 6/19/2015 1300 >60s >60s 0 0 17.8 3.29/14/2015 1445 >60s >60s 0 0 16.2 4.6 12/1/2015 1230 >60s >60s 0 0 15.5 5.63/15/2016 1300 >60s >60s 0 0 17.1 3.06/29/2016 1300 >60s >60s 0 0 17.7 3.4 Table 4 Landfill Gas Sampling Data BASF Enka Landfill Enka, North Carolina LFG SAMPLE Sample Sample Tube Time % CH4WELL ID DATE Time Purge Pumped By Volume % LEL % O2 % CO2 12/13/2010 1159 >60s >60s 0 0 14.2 6.7 LG-5 3/11/2011 1430 >60s >60s 0 0 15.6 5.7 6/3/2011 1300 >60s >60s 0 0 16.1 5.5 10/12/2011 1300 >60s >60s 0 0 15.6 5.212/14/2011 1430 >60s >60s 0 0 15.9 5.4 3/8/2012 1330 >60s >60s 0 0 14.6 6.16/14/2012 1245 >60s >60s 0 0 14.8 5.99/26/2012 1300 >60s >60s 0 0 14.2 6.0 12/3/2012 1330 >60s >60s 0 0 15.1 7.03/27/2013 1330 >60s >60s 0 0 14.7 6.0 6/3/2013 1500 >60s >60s 0 0 15.1 5.79/17/2013 1230 >60s >60s 0 0 15.5 4.9 12/11/2013 1330 >60s >60s 0 0 17.0 5.53/13/2014 1400 >60s >60s 0 0 15.2 5.6 6/5/2014 1400 >60s >60s 0 0 17.6 4.8 9/30/2014 1300 >60s >60s 0 0 17.4 5.012/19/2014 1300 >60s >60s 0 0 17.1 5.1 3/17/2015 1230 >60s >60s 0 0 15.1 5.46/19/2015 1330 >60s >60s 0 0 14.6 5.8 9/14/2015 1500 >60s >60s 0 0 18.8 1.912/1/2015 1300 >60s >60s 0 0 17.1 5.3 3/15/2016 1330 >60s >60s 0 0 15.5 4.36/29/2016 1330 >60s >60s 0 0 14.9 5.212/13/2010 1207 >60s >60s 0 0 18.9 2.1 3/11/2011 1500 >60s >60s 0 0 19.8 1.8LG-6 6/3/2011 1320 >60s >60s 0 0 19.4 1.6 10/12/2011 1000 >60s >60s 0 0 16.3 4.412/14/2011 1115 >60s >60s 0 0 16.7 4.9 3/8/2012 1400 >60s >60s 0 0 18.1 3.26/14/2012 1330 >60s >60s 0 0 17.6 3.4 9/26/2012 1330 >60s >60s 0 0 17.5 3.512/3/2012 1400 >60s >60s 0 0 20.2 1.53/27/2013 1400 >60s >60s 0 0 17.9 3.5 6/3/2013 1530 >60s >60s 0 0 17.4 3.69/17/2013 1300 >60s >60s 0 0 20.5 0.9 12/11/2013 1400 >60s >60s 0 0 19.6 1.23/13/2014 1430 >60s >60s 0 0 18.0 3.2 6/5/2014 1430 >60s >60s 0 0 18.1 3.09/30/2014 1330 >60s >60s 0 0 19.0 1.5 12/19/2014 1330 >60s >60s 0 0 18.9 1.7 3/17/2015 1300 >60s >60s 0 0 17.8 3.36/19/2015 1400 >60s >60s 0 0 17.6 3.4 9/14/2015 1530 >60s >60s 0 0 17.4 3.412/1/2015 1330 >60s >60s 0 0 19.5 1.3 3/15/2016 1400 >60s >60s 0 0 17.9 2.16/29/2016 1400 >60s >60s 0 0 17.5 3.1 Table 4 Landfill Gas Sampling Data BASF Enka Landfill Enka, North Carolina LFG SAMPLE Sample Sample Tube Time % CH4WELL ID DATE Time Purge Pumped By Volume % LEL % O2 % CO2 12/13/2010 1215 >60s >60s 0 0 19.4 1.1 3/11/2011 1515 >60s >60s 0 0 17.9 1.1 6/3/2011 1345 >60s >60s 0 0 17.8 1.3 LG-7 10/12/2011 1015 >60s >60s 0 0 17.9 2.212/14/2011 1100 >60s >60s 0 0 18.3 1.5 3/8/2012 1000 >60s >60s 0 0 18.7 2.26/14/2012 1030 >60s >60s 0 0 18.1 3.0 9/26/2012 1030 >60s >60s 0 0 18.0 2.912/3/2012 1030 >60s >60s 0 0 19.9 1.3 3/27/2013 1030 >60s >60s 0 0 21.9 0.36/3/2013 1115 >60s >60s 0 0 19.0 0.49/17/2013 1000 >60s >60s 0 0 18.9 2.3 12/11/2013 1100 >60s >60s 0 0 20.2 0.23/13/2014 1000 >60s >60s 0 0 19.1 2.4 6/5/2014 1100 >60s >60s 0 0 18.9 1.99/30/2014 1000 >60s >60s 0 0 18.1 1.9 12/19/2014 1000 >60s >60s 0 0 18.4 1.63/17/2015 1030 >60s >60s 0 0 19.9 1.0 6/19/2015 1100 >60s >60s 0 0 18.8 1.89/14/2015 1300 >60s >60s 0 0 19.0 2.212/1/2015 1000 >60s >60s 0 0 19.2 1.5 3/15/2016 1430 >60s >60s 0 0 19.0 1.26/29/2016 1415 >60s >60s 0 0 18.6 2.0 12/13/2010 1222 >60s >60s 0 0 18.0 2.9 3/11/2011 1530 >60s >60s 0 0 13.9 3.6 LG-8 6/3/2011 1430 >60s >60s 0 0 16.2 3.5 10/12/2011 1030 >60s >60s 0 0 16.2 3.1 12/14/2011 1145 >60s >60s 0 0 15.9 3.0 3/8/2012 1030 >60s >60s 0 0 19.1 1.96/14/2012 1040 >60s >60s 0 0 18.3 2.6 9/26/2012 1100 >60s >60s 0 0 18.2 2.412/3/2012 1050 >60s >60s 0 0 19.2 2.4 3/27/2013 1045 >60s >60s 0 0 18.7 2.46/3/2013 1145 >60s >60s 0 0 16.4 4.2 9/17/2013 1015 >60s >60s 0 0 18.3 4.112/11/2013 1115 >60s >60s 0 0 17.7 3.23/13/2014 1030 >60s >60s 0 0 19.1 2.3 6/5/2014 1115 >60s >60s 0 0 18.5 2.99/30/2014 1015 >60s >60s 0 0 16.2 4.4 12/19/2014 1010 >60s >60s 0 0 16.5 4.13/17/2015 1045 >60s >60s 0 0 17.4 2.7 6/19/2015 1115 >60s >60s 0 0 18.3 2.59/14/2015 1310 >60s >60s 0 0 18.4 2.3 12/1/2015 1015 >60s >60s 0 0 17.6 3.33/15/2016 1000 >60s >60s 0 0 17.2 1.96/29/2016 1000 >60s >60s 0 0 18.2 2.1 Table 4 Landfill Gas Sampling Data BASF Enka Landfill Enka, North Carolina LFG SAMPLE Sample Sample Tube Time % CH4WELL ID DATE Time Purge Pumped By Volume % LEL % O2 % CO2 12/13/2010 1227 >60s >60s 0 0 18.1 3.1 3/11/2011 1545 >60s >60s 0 0 17.9 1.8 6/3/2011 1500 >60s >60s 0 0 17.5 2.1 LG-9 10/12/2011 1040 >60s >60s 0 0 17.2 3.412/14/2011 1215 >60s >60s 0 0 17.5 3.5 3/8/2012 1100 >60s >60s 0 0 20.7 0.46/14/2012 1050 >60s >60s 0 0 19.9 1.2 9/26/2012 1115 >60s >60s 0 0 19.7 1.212/3/2012 1100 >60s >60s 0 0 19.5 2.9 3/27/2013 1100 >60s >60s 0 0 22.2 0.26/3/2013 1200 >60s >60s 0 0 14.0 2.59/17/2013 1030 >60s >60s 0 0 15.3 4.4 12/11/2013 1130 >60s >60s 0 0 17.4 3.33/13/2014 1100 >60s >60s 0 0 21.6 1.5 6/5/2014 1130 >60s >60s 0 0 15.8 2.79/30/2014 1045 >60s >60s 0 0 15.3 4.2 12/19/2014 1020 >60s >60s 0 0 15.5 4.03/17/2015 1100 >60s >60s 0 0 16.4 3.1 6/19/2015 1130 >60s >60s 0 0 15.2 4.39/14/2015 1320 >60s >60s 0 0 18.0 3.712/1/2015 1035 >60s >60s 0 0 17.2 3.1 3/15/2016 1030 >60s >60s 0 0 19.1 0.86/29/2016 1025 >60s >60s 0 0 15.3 4.2 12/13/2010 1235 >60s >60s 0 0 15.5 5.8 3/11/2011 1600 >60s >60s 0 0 16.8 4.7 LG-10 6/3/2011 1515 >60s >60s 0 0 17.1 3.8 10/12/2011 1100 >60s >60s 0 0 14.9 5.6 12/14/2011 1230 >60s >60s 0 0 14.2 5.7 3/8/2012 1115 >60s >60s 0 0 14.9 5.06/14/2012 1100 >60s >60s 0 0 14.7 4.9 9/26/2012 1130 >60s >60s 0 0 14.6 4.812/3/2012 1130 >60s >60s 0 0 16.0 5.8 3/27/2013 1130 >60s >60s 0 0 16.8 4.46/3/2013 1345 >60s >60s 0 0 14.9 4.5 9/17/2013 1100 >60s >60s 0 0 10.9 8.512/11/2013 1145 >60s >60s 0 0 13.2 6.93/13/2014 1130 >60s >60s 0 0 16.6 5.9 6/5/2014 1200 >60s >60s 0 0 15.0 5.19/30/2014 1100 >60s >60s 0 0 12.4 7.6 12/19/2014 1030 >60s >60s 0 0 12.9 7.03/17/2015 1110 >60s >60s 0 0 14.6 5.4 6/19/2015 1200 >60s >60s 0 0 16.8 5.79/14/2015 1330 >60s >60s 0 0 17.8 3.0 12/1/2015 1100 >60s >60s 0 0 14.2 5.93/15/2016 1100 >60s >60s 0 0 13.8 4.16/29/2016 1105 >60s >60s 0 0 16.9 5.5 Notes: Landfill gas data were collected using a calibrated Landtec GEM 2000+. CH4 = Methane; O2 = Oxygen; CO2 = Carbon Dioxide; LEL = Lower Explosive Limit; 5% CH4 = 100 % LEL FIGURES Fi g u r e 1 – P o t e n t i o m e t r i c S u r f a c e M a p Se m i - A n n u a l S a m p l i n g E v e n t – A p r i l 1 4 , 2 0 1 6 So u r c e : Go o g l e E a r t h Scale: 1” = ~200’ Si t e N a m e : B A S F C l o s e d I n d u s t r i a l L a n d f i l l E n k a , N o r t h C a r o l i n a MW - 5 (20 4 9 . 9 0 ) MW-6 (2076.29) M W - 4 R (2 0 5 6 . 5 0 ) Mo n i t o r i n g W e l l Gr o u n d w a t e r E l e v a t i o n P o t e n t i o m e t r i c C o n t o u r (2 0 4 9 . 9 1 ) MW - 3 (20 4 9 . 9 1 ) (2050 ) (2080 ) (2060) (2070) Ho m i n y Cr e e k Pe r m i t t e d Fa c i l i t y Bo u n d a r y Figure 2 – Surface Water Sample Locations Semi-Annual Sampling Event – April 14, 2016 Source: Google Earth (2013) Scale: 1” = ~350’ Site Name: BASF Closed Industrial Landfill Enka, North Carolina Surface Water Sample Location Hominy Creek Permitted Facility Boundary SW-1 DW-2 Seep-1 M W - 4 P P c L I M I T O F W A S T E S E D I M E N T A T I O N B A S I N c P N E W P E R M I T T E D F A C I L I T Y B O U N D A R Y ( S E E N O T E S ) M W - 6 M W - 3 M W - 5 B O U N D A R Y L I N E S O F S O L I D W A S T E P E R M I T N O . 1 1 - 0 2 L G - 1 L G - 2 L G - 3 L G - 4 L G - 5 L G - 6 L G - 7 L G - 8 L G - 9 L G - 1 0 E X T E N T O F L A N D F I L L W A S T E E N K A - B U N C O M B E C O U N T Y C L O S E D B A S F I N D U S T R I A L L A N D F I L L P L A N R E V I S I O N S F I G U R E - 3 S C A L E : 1 " = 1 0 0 ' D A T E : 0 9 - 0 9 - 1 0 E L M S i t e S o l u t i o n s , I n c . P . O . B O X 9 7 6 0 7 R a l e i g h , N o r t h C a r o l i n a 2 7 6 2 4 P h o n e : ( 9 1 9 ) 7 9 2 - 3 7 3 3 P R O J E C T : 1 0 0 7 - 1 0 - 0 0 8 T h i s d r a w i n g i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f E L M S i t e S o l u t i o n s , I n c a n d i s n o t t o b e r e p r o d u c e d o r c o p i e d i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t . I t i s o n l y t o b e u s e d f o r t h e p r o j e c t a n d s i t e s p e c i f i c a l l y i d e n t i f i e d h e r e i n a n d i s n o t t o b e u s e d o n a n y o t h e r p r o j e c t . I t i s t o b e r e t u r n e d u p o n r e q u e s t . N O . D A T E D E S C R I P T I O N S A N D H I L L R O A D N O R T H C A R O L I N A E X I S T I N G T R E E L I N E N E W L A N D F I L L G A S E X I S T I N G P O W E R L I N E E X I S T I N G M I N O R C O N T O U R E X I S T I N G M O N I T O R I N G W E L L E X I S T I N G M A J O R C O N T O U R L E G E N D P E X I S T I N G F E N C E X X X P E R M I T T E D L A N D F I L L V O L U M E = 4 0 6 4 6 0 C U B I C Y A R D S N O T E S A R E A W I T H I N O R I G I N A L S O L I D W A S T E P E R M I T B O U N D A R Y = 2 8 . 1 3 A C R E S O R I G I N A L T O P O G R A P H I C S U R V E Y D A T A A N D S I T E I N F O R M A T I O N P R O V I D E D F R O M A S U R V E Y M A P T I T L E D T O P O G R A P H I C S U R V E Y - A P R I L 2 0 0 3 B A S F C O R P O R A T I O N I N D U S T R I A L L A N D F I L L , E N K A , N . C . , D R A W I N G N O . 9 7 0 5 3 - 4 _ 1 _ 0 3 ; P R E P A R E D B Y C . O . H A M P T O N C O M P A N Y - L A N D S U R V E Y O R S , P . O . D R A W E R 1 3 1 9 , F L E T C H E R , N . C . A R E A W I T H I N N E W S O L I D W A S T E P E R M I T B O U N D A R Y = 4 1 . 7 5 A C R E S A S - B U I L T S U R V E Y D A T A A N D S I T E I N F O R M A T I O N P R O V I D E D F R O M A S U R V E Y M A P T I T L E D S U R V E Y O F S O L I D W A S T E L A N D F I L L , P E R M I T N O . 1 1 - 0 2 , C O L B O N D A C Q U I S I T I O N I I N C . ; D R A W I N G N O . 0 5 1 6 7 F I N A L - V 2 0 0 0 ; P R E P A R E D B Y 2 7 7 8 , A S H E V I L L E , N . C . N E W P E R M I T T E D F A C I L I T Y B O U N D A R Y R E Q U I R E D P E R N C D E N R L E T T E R D A T E D A P R I L 1 , 2 0 0 4 . B E T H B . G I L L A M , P . L . S . , O F H U T C H I S O N - B I G G S & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . , P . O . B O X M W - 2 A B A N D O N E D O N A P R I L 2 3 , 2 0 0 9 I N A C C O R D A N C E W I T H 1 5 A N C A C 2 C . 0 1 1 3 . M W - 6 I N S T A L L E D O N A P R I L 2 3 , 2 0 0 9 . T B M - T E M P O R A R Y B E N C H M A R K S L A N D F I L L G A S M O N I T O R I N G W E L L L O C A T I O N S A R E A P P R O X I M A T E . F I N A L L O C A T I O N S W I L L B E I N F L U E N C E D B Y A C C E S S A N D O T H E R P O T E N T I A L I M P E D I M E N T S . A N A S - B U I L T S U R V E Y W I L L B E C O M P L E T E D O N C E F I N A L I N S T A L L A T I O N S A R E C O M P L E T E . S I T E L O C A T I O N - N . T . S . I - 4 0 H W Y - 1 9 / 2 3 S A N D H I L L R D S I T E M O N I T O R I N G W E L L S APPENDICES APPENDIX A FIELD SAMPLE COLLECTION RECORDS I Well/Piezo ID:S w-/ Ground Water Sample Collection Record Client:Date:()'f f '1/2<71 f., Project Name:B71.sF~N~I}Project Number:_ Site Location:Ef!(~!t I/U C.Start:IDQO af;i?pm Weather Conditions:60 ••f'oS"Lc.M '"d Finish:,I 0 0 ~/pm WATER LEVELDATA:(measured from top of casing)-51c.,.1'~U.W6I tzlL.!'~P /.sL.. a.TotalWell Length:N)4 c.CasingMaterial:N JI9 e.Water Column Length(a-b): b.Water Table /V r9-d.CasingDiameter:tv19 f.CalculatedWell Depth:Volume: WELLPURGINGDATA:f~J'.f~~a.Purge Method:---'L'--_ b.Acceptance Criteria: -Minimum Required Purge Volume (@__....:N:....:....:...i4'----wellvolumes)_ -Maximum Allowable Turbidity ..:....'_0 NTUs -Stabilization of Parameters --.::'_0 % c.FieldTesting Equipment Used Make 7'3 I Model _--,6~9-=z.::..o=-__ d.Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation "..,f/c'Joot Serial Number .................. /GYS-CJ.) I!J.OY71.0 e:J.OV70.0'17 r./JDS-O Z.Oz..r O.OY7 f a.i:J 2 I~2 .I /O·YI rr«.</o.?ti 137.s: Yes Noe.Acceptance criteria pass/fail Has required volume been removed Has required turbidity been reached Have parameters stabilized If No or N/A-Explain below D Der060 N/A ITDo SAMPLECOLLECTION:Method: I 'II S ..,I y Additional Comments;_ J } Date:__--=()'--''1~/.c-I-'y'__l_Z=-2.<J=-=-.</k=--_,} I WelljPiezo ID:j)W-2. Ground Water Sample Collection Record Client:Date:0 't;I 't ~I "~, Project Name:I3I9Sr ~"'J(JII Project Number:-.,-_ Site Location:E#M,IV!.Start:/Ir ~/pm Weather Conditions:(000 ~tlAAt(I 'Q Finish:1200 am/rJt11 WATER lEVEL DATA:(measured/rom top of casinq]Su,~~WA~S"~/'" a.Total Well Length:IJ J9 c.CasingMaterial:/11"e.Water ColumnLength(a-b):/VA f.Calculated Well Volume:b.Water Table Depth: d.Casing Diameter:- WEll PURGINGDATA:/) a.Purge Method:--.J!V-:.......::~~::._.:J:.-.'_~~({.-~.=...:..~f.1L---------------------- b.Acceptance Criteria: -Minimum Required Purge Volume (@ __--'-.N_II1 welivolumes)----------- _Maximum Allowable Turbidity --'-/....:O~NTUs _Stabilization of Parameters .::...J _0 % c.FieldTesting Equipment Used Make S /Model _--=b--=-9.::;.Z-O-=-__ d.FieldTesting Equi ent Calibration Documentation Serial Number __2_7_~_o_~_ /IS-o Z.O /3.01 7·00 b.O!":; 7.Z./0.19 /ZV.7 ••••••••••••••• /·0 /r.o«7.01 o.os'v'/:s: z .s:~?.9.r i.(.9/1 IJ.tJ.("~7.0 /0,7/VU,? e.Acceptance criteria pass/fail Yes No N/A Hasrequired volume been removed D D ~Hasrequired turbidity been reached 0"0 DHaveparametersstabilizeder00IfNoorN/A-Explain below SAMPLECOLLECTION:Method:O>.er/~tf~p J rD.5 -., Additional Comments:-----~-----------------------------------------.) Date:_-=If):.....:y':..l;A~'/__.:y-A7~~=_!I,2'(p~_Signature: WelljPiezo ID:IhlW-'l Ground Water Sample Collection Record Client:----,-....,..--_ Project Name:_----AB.~'I'I!...:J~r!..__£=:....:..M~~~'B~_ Site Location:__---'e....'NtIt'.J:.M:!!o~/l-'It/'--=----(!..------ Weather Conditions:b~o=-----'r~~.JLI.U'I~~I1:L...7J;f_ Date:_~O=----=-,II.I--I.!...../..':....Y /L-:-?tJ_I_~=---- Project Number:_ Start:I Uo am/roP Finish:13DO am/~ WATER LEVEL DATA:(measured from top of casing) a.Total Well Length:10./b c.Casing Material: ~.S-3 »vc e.Water Column Length (a-b): f.Calculated Well Volume: b.Water Table Depth: d.Casing Diameter: WELL PURGING DATA: a.Purge Method:~~_...:'M:::.....:...._,,_~....:~_'"_._~_••._I,ec.::...---------------------- b.Acceptance Criteria: -Minimum Required Purge Volume (@__.=:Lo=..;...~.:::....:..~-,~..::.'P_W well volumes)_ -Maximum Allowable Turbidity '_0 NTUs -Stabilization of Parameters ....:/'--=-0 % c.Field Testing Equipment Used Make ~£I Model_~6=-9=_ZO=_ d.Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation Serial Number Z.7101 (PINE) ).:",',>':.:[ii > ...'.....':....'.,.... :.: •••••••••• :,.:......:-.,:.:.,.,,:....... IZ3~/.0 ,y.zz.7.J*;2.'-~2-•~/.'7 -I•• 12.YO ,.r ty.'J1J 7.1'1 2.9'/7-17.s:/.'17 -.0 ,21"'>Z.t:>I/Y.S/S-7.1'J z...92-9 0.>/.ZB ....;;6·2- /ze»z.r I¥."'~7./~2.92.7 o.$"I·'2-2.--Y'.~/7S',r ~,o /Y.~i 7./1 '7...92-~O.~1./9 -r2,1) " o 0Ej0I:2t 0 N/A ~oo e.Acceptance criteria pass/fail Has required volume been removed Has required turbidity been reached Have parameters stabilized If No or N/A -Explain below Yes No J)W-I SAMPLE COLLECTION:Method: Additional Comments:_ 5;,"''"',=fji~afMt~A~_J I Well/Piezo ID:MW·Y~ Ground Water Sample Collection Record Client:--------0----=--------- Project Name:_--c~~'IJ.~~Lr~~=M~'J.t=.:II:~_ Site Location:__--'.£o=...:.M.:..:~=ttL...j_•....:~-"--'c.=------- Weather Conditions:_---!!6~.r~,;E'_____"'Si'_'''''ff'''''''~,,~~:}---- Date:()_~.:...,.l-t-l--=-y-l-I--z,-O-'/-6- Project Number:_ Start:/Y I>0 am/!1S> Finish:/roo am/~ WATER LEVEL DATA:(measured from top of casing) a.Total Well Length::13·00 -c.Casing Material: Z-6.17 . e.Water Column Length (a-b): f.Calculated Well Volume: b.Water Table Depth: d.Casing Diameter: WELL PURGING DATA: a.Purge Method:--.JI1~~~~/_·Lf1.___.::l.::::••.-::::"':=-~Y-'~-------------------,b.Acceptance Criteria: -Minimum Required Purge Volume (@ tD_-t.V_.:...,&._/._tuu well volumes)_ -Maximum Allowable Turbidity L_P NTUs -Stabilization of Parameters --'J"-=O"---% c.Field Testing Equipment Used Make fJ £1 Model _---""6'--'9'-~=-=D'____ d.Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation Serial Number _ /.0 IYfr ····.·····.·····1:.>\ II ':IS- IYVoIYY.r z..Q IYro z..r e.Acceptance criteria pass/fail Has required volume been removed Hasrequired turbidity been reached Have parameters stabilized If No or N/A-Explain below Yes No N/AEIDD DBB DDD SAMpLE COLLECTION:Method: Additional Comments:_ 5;,",,",",~~O~==-----__J J Date:_~o=-yL.II-!..:.-/~'I_)/~~=V~6=--------- I Well/Pieza ID:/J1W_S-1 Client:=---_ Project Name:$IlJF CNJ<19 Site Location:IENJ<.19 J IV" Weather Conditions:6 r-i J'tA,III"( WATER LEVEL DATA:(measured from top of casing) a.Total Well Length:19.3'.s-•c.Casing Material: 7.72.' Ground Water Sample Collection Record Date:01.(/J Y/UI ~, Project Number:_ Start:I.r:OD am/Ifi> Finish:/6(:>0 am/~ b.Water Table Depth: e.Water Column Length (a-b): f.Calculated Well Volume:".>~r~f>It!.u/I~e,~ WELL PURGING DATA:f?t.f/?/!""10 a.Purge Method:~__/_~.....f7_t.A•••_._-4_n_]jIfL----------------------- b.Acceptance Criteria: -Minimum Required PurgeVolume (@_--=to=-:!V'J==-.:....;C.-"-;,-'-Q(.-=-~well volumes)_ -Maximum Allowable Turbidity ...:/_1:>NTUs -Stabilization of Parameters ---'1'----'0 % rvc d.Casing Diameter: c.FieldTesting Equipment Used Make 'IS I Model _~~~9-",Zc=__ d.FieldTesting Equipment Calibration Documentation Serial Number _ /ryo Z.O e.Acceptance criteria pass/fail Has required volume been removed Has required turbidity been reached Have parameters stabilized If No or N/A-Explain below Yes No N/A @DD DDD SAMPLE COLLECTION:Method:1fJ~/~d?~(:) mw-s TO r ••}i.CAh~l:ys.i$/••·••···•••·•··•···•.•··········iTim~<················ V{)C~6260 /600 Additional Comments:_ Date:_--...:O~tt~Z-L.j.s....,V,.........ht7~/~b----7 I Well/Piezo ID: /11W-& Ground Water Sample Collection Record Date:.0"/J ¥/'LOI /, Project Numbe/__'_ Start:/'fd am/@! Finish:IZt.JJC:1 am/CiIiY Client:~~__:_----=--------_ Project Name:liAS J'-ENI<IT Site Location:E Nk.tt I N C- Weather Conditions:70'F St.Y1..,# WATERLEVELDATA:(measured from top a/casing) a.Total Well length:'/2.OD"/,.,..~c.Casing Material:eVG b.Water Table Depth: d.Casing Diameter: e.Water Column length (a-b): f.Calculated Well Volume: WELLPURGINGDATA: a.Purge Method:=6t-=eo==-=j;'-w-=8"---'~""-=~=:..M...:_=..£(LJ__"I_=_.~(,.•••£'___!!!Pt_"~"_=_'_'_+f----------- b.Acceptance Criteria: -Minimum Required PurgeVolume (@ __-'f..o=--'-...v----'r_~_IN well volumes)_ -Maximum Allowable Turbidity ~/_O NTUs -Stabilization of Parameters --=-'-'-0=---% c.FieldTesting Equipment Used Make ':IS I Model __,,,,"--q,---",,2-0,,-,,,,,-__ d.FieldTesting Equipment Calibration Documentation Serial Number _ /.I? /./Z IffY.2 :i.·•••••·•.( .......••. /y/.y /.1)2.rer:»o.q?18r:t) /Ah./ Yes Noe.Acceptance criteria pass/fail Hasrequired volume been removed Hasrequired turbidity been reached Have parameters stabilized If No or N/A-Explain below N/Al2rDD SAMPLECOLLECTION:Method:teaSu..e JuA/J1£1!s11JU e~e :Sampl~lri }\tpritaih¢f:TYp~.N~:Qf~ritilnElB/....;(@s~rY~tli:il}/•.•'T / // r (C/~r/-h:t Additional Comments:r..--------..--------------------------- Sign ature:~~Date:()~LjI_7--"-I-'V'__f7--'U>.~~'-"'b"'-------I J NC Division of Waste Management -Solid Waste Section Landfill Gas Monitoring Data Form Notice:This form and any information attached to it are "Public Records"as defined in NC General Statute 132-1.As such, these documents are available for inspection and examination by any person upon request (NC General Statute 132-6). Facility Name:$115 p ~Permit Number:_~t~'1-=D=--='2....=---_ Date of Sampling:12/t>*r NC Landfill Rule (.0500 or .1600):_,_O'_lfV-'----_O _ Name and Position of Sample Collector:J~€)[2~/'4a/Hr6€0t.06lsr Type and Serial Number of Gas Meter:{/IIvpr&.c 6£-,11~Calibration Date of Gas Meter:///zs-k.r 6M 119zr ' Date and Time of Field Calibration:O?Jo 12../0/1Zt:J1S' Type ofField Calibration Gas (15/15 or 35/50):'"3:-).ro Expiration Date ofField Calibration Gas Canister:"~O/Za~ Pump Rate of Gas Meter:O.S-t.11'f.I;~. I Ambient Air Temperature:~r Barometric Pressure:up"f'70.06 :.,..General Weather Conditions:~fI-t:/rl'''l:U(Q-IIt~· Instructions:Under "Location or LFG Well"identify the monitoring wells or describe the location for other tests (e.g.,inside buildings).A drawing showing the location oftest must be attached.Report methane readings in both %LEL and %methane by volume.A reading in percent methane by volume can be converted to %LEL as follows:%methane by volume =% LEL/20 o Location.or Sample.Tube Tune LFGvtdtIDPutg~ Tune ·Ptlmped(s} Initial %La o/ctr..EL .by V'ohnne Stabilized o/cCH4 1l/B02 %C02 ~tes o 1t6-1 ""60r //,]'0 7bOr o sO .1'7.1 s.Y o 0 17./S'.io011.:1 /.s ",Q I'I.~.I.S. o 0 172-s.» c»0 IY·2 579 If your facility has more gas monitoring locations than there is room on this form,please attach additional sheets listing the same information as contained on this form. t,...t;-z L.,/;-7ILb-B o Certification To the best of my knowledge,the information reported and statements made on this data submittal and attachments are true and correct.I am aware that there are significant penalties for making any false statement,representation,or certification including the possibility of a fme and imprisonment. /200 ~t~OJ oo o .0 TITLE 16 NC Division of Waste Management -Solid Waste Section Landfill Gas Monitoring Data Form Notice;This form and any information attached to it are "Public Records"as defined in NC General Statute 132-1.As such, these documents are available [or inspection and examination by any person upon request (NC General Statute 132-6). Facility Name:__/J._"'_s._~__~_~_"'_Ir Permit Number:_-=---/_'_0_"2....-=-:'--__----'-__ Date of Sampling:D"i/I'>/~lJlb NC Landfill Rule (.0500 or .1600):_,_O_s",",o__O _,, Name and Position of Sample Collector:Jeg(SM'1 el>oM,plIJJ Ecr (,Sa,oGlS r Type and Serial Number of Gas Meter:!"AHt>1'£C O£,1)f ~O Calibration Date of Gas Meter:/)3/09 /UtI, Date and Time of Field Calibration:tJ9 ~0 03 It.s/~J b Type ofField Calibration Gas (15/15 or 35/50):3.>j-v Expiration Date ofField Calibration Gas Canister:09/to/-ZOt:~ Pump Rate of Gas Meter:O.S"'-k;..,• Ambient Air Temperature:7SO r Barometric Pressure:ZtJ·80 ;11..General Weather Conditions:S'"t.ur iIJ 7 Instructions:Under "Location or LPG Well"identify the monitoring wells or describe the location for other tests (e.g.,inside buildings),A drawing showing the location of test must be attached,Report methane readings in both %LEL and %methane by volume.A reading in percent methane by volume can be converted to %LEL as follows:%methane by volume =% LELl20 ,.." .Locationor Sample.Tabe T.ime Time fuitia:l Srnbilized ~WH4 llj\i02 %C01.Notes tFaWcltlD PUtgt ~ed(5J %tEL o/~Lill;>by'VoImne Il0J-l "?6Os ,ZoO 7hOs ,0 0 fZ}IT'.7 z...~u:.-"2-,{;,or I~:~O "lbOs 6 e 1i?f IB.6 I.g/'6-'3 ~6C)r IZYS-~tlGOr 0 ~@ 16,,7 Z..9 lG-Y '6c:u 1300 ~bO~(if ..e e 17,,1 '3.e>LG-S-,,6:9,./370 ~60$ii1 f3 <0 'S·S-t.j,s /.,G,-b ">bGs 1~t)O >bbr e (p e J7.'%.../t,t;-7 .,.~O"..../'/10 >60s ..~f2J .,~.1't.O /.2;,... 1.6-8 :!'£:,os-/()tK:J .,1":0.1 i?!.'0 0'17·2../.9/.6-9 '?60s I/Oso .,~Or /lJ ~0 19.J o.~ La -10 ,7bO~1//00 71.;Os e 'fi!J 121 I?~'I.I If your facility has more gas monitoring locations than there is room on this form,please attach additional sheets listing the same information as contained on this form, Certification To the best of my knowledge,the information reported and statements made onthis data submittal and attachments are true and correct.I am aware that there are significant penalties for making any false statement,representation,or certification including the possibility of a fme and imprisonment.SIGNtJ;~O~}Ir/U>J6II 1TfLE ' 16 NC Dlvision of Waste Management -Solid Waste Section Landfill Gas Monitoring Data Form Notice:This form and any information attached to it are "Public Records"as defmed in NC General Statute 132-1.As such, these documents are available for inspection and examination by any person upon re.quest (NC General Statute 132-6). Facility Name:81lS F £1YJ!.ttt Permit Number:------'1"-'1'--0-"2-=-_ Date of Sampling:06/'J.tf/ZOth NCLandfillRule(.0500or.l600):-=-,_O_Sl_D_O _~, Name and Position of Sample Collector:J~t)POM)P/l./Vur 6~/sr- Type and Serial Number of Gas Meter:L1'1llc-C6£.IJ1~bO Calibration Date of Gas Meter:fJ'/U/~/66MlI9Z:S-> Date and Time ofField Calibration:o2J!)~~1'6 Type ofField Calibration Gas (15i15 or 35/50):"3Jffv Expiration Date ofField Calibration Gas Canister:,,9j'll>M16' Pump Rate of Gas Meter:tJ#~l./""'Vc."•• Ambient Air Temperature:I£~f Barometric Pressure:tf.98 General Weather Conditions:I-IDr;5V~. Instructions:Under "Location or LFG Well"identify the monitoring wells or describe the location for other tests (e.g.,inside buildings).A drawing showing the location oftest must be attached.Report methane readings in both %LEL and %methane by volume.A reading in percent methane by volume can be converted to %LEL as follows:%methane by volume =% LELl20 Time Initial Pumped{s)%LEL %C02 NotesLocation.or SampleTube TimetFG,\~cltID~ge .by\oInine -~//:I.r eJ /7.7 Lk--b ·>60$IVoo 7bOJ .er/B.~ .3'-y ILS-9 )l6Dr /ozs:-ec»t:EY./f:3 If your facility has more gas monitoring locations than there is room on this form,please attach additional sheets listing the same information as contained on this form. Certification To the best of my knowledge,the information reported and statements made on this data submittal and attachments are true and correct.I am aware that there are significant penalties for making any false statement,representation,or certification including the possibility of a fme and imprisonment. TITLE 16 APPENDIX B LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT