7803_Robeson_MSWLF_SprayIrr_DIN26735_20160919

ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
ROBESON COUNTY LANDFILL

Prepared on Behalf of:

Robeson County
701 N. Elm Street Lumberton
North Carolina 28358

Dated:

February 9, 2016

Prepared by:

3430 Capuano St.
Lumberton, NC 28358

Table of Contents

1.0 Table of Contents ................................................................................................................. 0
INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1
1.0 EAA STEP 1: DETERMINE IF THE PROPOSED DISCHARGE WILL BE ALLOWED
2
1.1 Determine if Discharge Is Allowable ............................................................................... 2
1.2 Project Description ........................................................................................................... 3
2.0 EAA STEP 2: PROVIDE PROJECTIONS FOR POPULATION AND FLOW ............... 4
3.0 EAA STEP 3: EVALUATE TECHNOLOGICALLY FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES ..... 5
3.1 Alternative A. Connection to an Existing Wastewater Treatment Plant .......................... 5
3.1.1 Alternative A(1). Connection to Town of St. Pauls WWTP..................................... 5
3.1.2 Alternative A(2). Connection to the City of Lumberton WWTP ............................. 5
3.2 Alternative B: Disposal by Land Application .................................................................. 6
3.3 Alternative C: Wastewater Reuse .................................................................................... 8
3.4 Alternative D: Direct Discharge to Surface Waters ......................................................... 8
3.5 Alternative E: Combination of Alternatives ..................................................................... 8
4.0 EAA Step 4: EVALUATE ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF ALTERNATIVES .............. 9
4.1 Connect to an Existing Wastewater Treatment Plant ....................................................... 9
4.1.1 Alternative A(2). Connection to the City of Lumberton WWTP ........................... 10
4.2 Alternative B: Disposal by Land Application ................................................................ 10
4.3 Alternative C: Wastewater Reuse .................................................................................. 10
4.4 Alternative D: Direct Discharge to Surface Waters ....................................................... 11
4.5 Alternative E: Combination of Alternatives ................................................................... 11
4.6 Results of Analysis of Economic Alternatives ............................................................... 11
5.0 Local Government Review Form ....................................................................................... 11
6.0 References .......................................................................................................................... 12

Figures

Figure 1: Site Location
Figure 2: Nearest WWTPs
Figure 3: Soils Map

Appendices

Appendix I: Analytical Results
Appendix II: OMB Discount Rate
Appendix III: Costing Analysis
Appendix IV: Supporting Information and Manufacturer’s Literature
Appendix V: Preliminary Design Calculations

Robeson County Landfill
Landfill Leachate Treatment System
. Page 1 of 20

INTRODUCTION

The Robeson County Landfill (RCL) currently receives solid waste in Robeson County, near St.
Pauls, North Carolina (Figure 1). During precipitation events, water percolates through waste
deposited in the landfill whereby it becomes “leachate”. At RCL this leachate is collected in a
conveyance system on site and stored for off-site disposal. Hunt Environmental Associates (HEA)
previously has investigated additional treatment options for this facility, and based upon HEA's
review the leachate on-site can be treated with an on-site wasterwater treatment system. Therefore,
RCL will apply for a NPDES permit to discharge water to treat the leachate onsite. As a part of
the NPDES permit review process, the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
(NCDEQ) has required RCL to prepare an Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA).

This EAA is submitted to comply with the Water Quality Permitting Section, NCDEQ – NPDES
requirements for Individual Minor NPDES Applications. The permitting process and related
guidance documents for Individual Minor NPDES Applications are focused on small industrial,
municipal, and non-municipal wastewater treatment plant discharges. The RCL will only discharge
treated landfill leachate. This project involves no domestic wastewater discharge.

1.0 EAA STEP 1: DETERMINE IF THE PROPOSED DISCHARGE WILL BE
ALLOWED

1.1 Determine if Discharge Is Allowable

RCL is not aware of any Lumber River permitting strategies that would limit discharges of water
from the landfill to Big Marsh Swamp. The receiving stream (Big Marsh Swamp) does not have
any classification restrictions according the DWR website. Also, there are no impaired waters or
TMDL's designated along the Big Marsh Swamp according to the NC Division of Water Quality's
website.

The USGS was contacted to further determine the streamflow characteristics at the site. Mr. Curtis
Weaver with the USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center responded in an email dated July 2,
2015:

“In response to your inquiry about the low-flow characteristics (7Q10, 30Q2) for Big Marsh
Swamp near Saint Pauls in Robeson County, the following information is provided:

A check of the low-flow files here at the USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center (Raleigh
office) does not indicate a previous low-flow determination for your specific point of interest
(lat/long 34.782402 // -78.903629) provided via email dated June 29, 2015. No USGS discharge
records are likewise known to exist for the point of interest. However, the low-flow files do
indicate a previous determination for an upstream location on Big Marsh Swamp near Oakland
(station id 02134297, drainage area approx. 60 sqmi, at Secondary Road 1924, known as Barker
10 Mile Road). Completed in February 1980, the 7Q10 discharge was estimated at 0.2 cfs (cubic
feet per second).

In the absence of site-specific discharge records sufficient for a low-flow analysis, estimates of
low-flow characteristics at ungaged locations are determined by assessing a range in the low-flow
yields (expressed as flow per square mile drainage area, or cfsm) at nearby sites where estimates
have been determined.

For streams in Robeson County, low-flow characteristics published by the USGS are provided in
the following reports:

(1) The first is a statewide report completed in the early 1990's. It is USGS Water-Supply
Paper 2403, "Low-flow characteristics of streams in North Carolina" (Giese and Mason,
1993). An online version of the report is available at
http://pubs.usgs.gov/wsp/2403/report.pdf. The report provides the low-flow characteristics
(based on data through 1988) via regional relations and at-site values for continuous-record
streamgages and partial-record sites with drainage basins between 1 and 400 sqmi and not
considered or known to be affected by regulation and/or diversions.

(2) The second is a statewide report published in March 2015. It is USGS Scientific
Investigations Report 2015-5001, "Low-flow characteristics and flow-duration statistics
for selected USGS continuous-record streamgaging stations in North Carolina through

2012" (Weaver, 2015). The report is available online at
http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2015/5001/. The report provides updated low-flow characteristics
and flow-duration statistics for 266 active (as of 2012 water year) and discontinued
streamgages across the state where a minimum of 10 climatic years discharge records were
available for flow analyses.

A basin delineation completed using the online NC StreamStats application
(http://water.usgs.gov/osw/streamstats/north_carolina.html) indicates the drainage area for your
point of interest is 63 sqmi.

Inspection of both reports indicates the presence of four nearby selected USGS partial-record sites
(3) and continuous-record streamgage (1) in the general vicinity of your point of interest on Big
Marsh Swamp where low-flow characteristics have previously been published. Among these 4
sites, the annual 7Q10 yields range from zero to 0.007 cfsm (average 0.004 cfsm). In a similar
manner, the annual 30Q2 yields range from 0.048 to 0.133 cfsm (average 0.09 cfsm).
Applying the above annual 7Q10 and 30Q2 yield ranges to the drainage area (63 sqmi) for the
point of interest results in an annual 7Q10 discharge estimated in the range from zero to 0.44 cfs
(average 0.25 cfs) and annual 30Q2 discharge estimated in the range of 3.0 to 8.4 cfs (average 5.7
cfs).”

Based on this correspondence and discussion with NCDWR, it is determined that based on the
7Q10 estimates from the USGS water quality based effluent limitations may be assigned.
Additionally, technology-based limits in accordance with 40 CFR 445 will apply since the site
operates as a RCRA Subtitle D Non-Hazardous landfill.

RCL is not aware of any endangered species that would be impacted by the proposed discharge.
A review of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Website (htto://www.fws.gov/nc-
es/es/countvfr.html) shows that there are three endangered species listed in Robeson County.
These are the Red-Cockaded Woodpecker, Michaux’s sumac, and the American Alligator.
However, since the property in question is currently an active landfill facility operated by Robeson
County, it is assumed that habitat necessary for these species does not occur on the property.

The proposed RO system would not have any issues meeting these standards, therefore it is
assumed that the proposed discharge will pass the “allowable discharge” criteria.

1.2 Project Description

The proposed Robeson County Landfill Leachate Treatment Plant will be located on the landfill’s
property, consisting of about 450 acres, in Robeson County (Figure 1). The RCL is currently
accepting construction and demolition debris (C&D) waste over the closed Phase 1 Municipal
Solid Waste (MSW) unlined landfill. All MSW is being disposed in the Phase 4 lined landfill. The
leachate tanks on site collects leachate water from Phases II, III, and IV.

The leachate conveyance system consists of perforated pipes which via a force main transfer the
leachate to two 250,000 gallon storage tanks. Currently the leachate is pumped into tanker trucks
and hauled off-site. The new treatment plant will be located adjacent the storage tanks and when

built will utilize reverse osmosis (RO) technology to treat the leachate water prior to discharge into
a nearby ditch. Discharged water will travel through the unnamed ditch to an abandoned borrow
pit, and once the pond water is sufficiently high will convey via an overflow pipe to Big Marsh
Swamp. The location of the proposed outfall are shown on the plans submitted with the NPDES
Permit Application.

Based on the past years’ leachate haul-off data, the average daily discharge is calculated to be
15,000 gallons per day (GPD). Due to the current permit to construct for a new landfill cell (Phase
5); upon completion it is expected that the leachate discharge will increase to 25,000 GPD. It is
expected that the discharge rate will increase an average of 5,000 GPD with the construction of
each new landfill cell, which will occur on average every 7-10 years.

Contact Information

Applicant Name: Robeson County
Mailing Address: 701 N. Elm Street, Lumberton, NC 28358
Phone Number: 910-865-3348
Contact Person: Steve Edge

Facility Name: Robeson County Landfill
Address: 246 Landfill Rd., St. Pauls, NC 28384
County: Robeson
Phone Number: 910-865-3348
Contact Person: Steve Edge

EAA Preparer: Hunt Environmental Associates, PLLC
Mailing Address: PO Box 390, Lumberton, NC 28359
Phone Number: 910-674-5925
Contact Person: Cody Hunt

2.0 EAA STEP 2: PROVIDE PROJECTIONS FOR POPULATION AND FLOW

Step 2 is mainly applicable to domestic wastewater production resulting from changes in
population. Step 2 does not apply to the RCL Leachate Treatment operations as leachate discharge
is independent of population changes. No domestic wastewater discharges are resultant from the
landfill operation. As explained above, leachate discharge will is expected to be 15,000 gallons
per day (GPD) initially. Due to the current permit to construct for a new landfill cell (Phase 5)
which will begin in 2016; upon completion it is expected that the leachate discharge will increase
to 25,000 GPD. It is expected that the discharge rate will increase an average of 5,000 GPD with
the construction of each new landfill cell, which will occur on average every 7-10 years.

3.0 EAA STEP 3: EVALUATE TECHNOLOGICALLY FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES

Five alternatives are evaluated herein to assess their technological feasibility. Those alternates
found to be technologically feasible will be evaluated for economic feasibility in Step 4. The five
alternatives assessed for technological feasibility are:

A. Connection to an Existing Wastewater System
(1) Town of St. Pauls Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP)
(2) City of Lumberton Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP)
B. Land Application
C. Wastewater Reuse
D. Direct Discharge to Surface Waters
E. Combination of Alternatives

3.1 Alternative A. Connection to an Existing Wastewater Treatment Plant

In order to evaluate the feasibility of connecting to an existing wastewater treatment system, the
closest existing NPDES permit holders were considered: (1) The Town of St. Pauls WWTP and
(2) City of Lumberton WWTP. A description of the infrastructure and logistical challenges to
connecting to either of these systems is detailed as follows:

3.1.1 Alternative A(1). Connection to Town of St. Pauls WWTP

The Town of St. Pauls’ existing sewer system does extend onto NC Highway 20 within
approximately 3 miles of the RCL site. At this distance, infrastructure wise, it is cost effective for
the RCL to connect to the Town of St. Pauls’ WWTP (contact: Danny Hallman). During 2013-
2014, as a pilot study, RCL hauled its leachate to the Town of St. Pauls’ WWTP for a period of
about six months to determine whether it was technologically feasible for the Town to treat the
RCL leachate. During the first two months, approximately 10,000 GPD was disposed of at the
Town’s WWTP. It was clear during the second month that the Town could not treat this volume
of leachate from RCL, therefore, the pilot study was scaled back to 3,000 GPD. This also caused
upset at the Town of St. Pauls’ WWTP, therefore the pilot study was suspended and all leachate
hauling has since been suspended. It was determined that in order for the Town of St. Pauls’
WWTP to accept leachate from the RCL, the Town would have to invest significantly in its WWTP
and conveyance system. This idea was presented to the Town Council and was ultimately rejected.

Due to the small size of St. Pauls’ WWTP (< 1 MGD) and lack of additional capacity, any
introduced waste stream even at the scale we are proposing herein (25,000 GPD) has the potential
to cause significant upset as was witnessed in our pilot study. Therefore, it is clear that a connection
to the Town of St. Pauls’ WWTP is technologically infeasible.

3.1.2 Alternative A(2). Connection to the City of Lumberton WWTP

As shown in Figure 2, the second municipal wastewater treatment plant located to the south of the
subject area is the City of Lumberton’s WWTP (contact: Steve West). Mr. West, as well as various
other City of Lumberton staff have been contacted by HEA. The City of Lumberton currently

accepts RCL’s leachate from a manhole that is located miles from the WWTP (for dilution
purposes according to Mr. West). The WWTP is permitted at 20 MGD and operates at 5-8 MGD
on average, therefore they have ample capacity to continue acceptance of the RCL leachate via a
tie-in to their existing sewerage system.

The closest existing sewer line from the City of Lumberton’s sewerage system is located near the
intersection of Barker Ten Mile Rd. and Duart Rd. (Figure 2), approximately 11.5 miles from the
RCL site. In order to convey wastewater from RCL to the City, at minimum, 2 lift stations and
11.5 miles of force main would need to be constructed. The costs associated with Alternative A(2)
are discussed in Step 4 (Section 4.1).

3.2 Alternative B: Disposal by Land Application

The proposed treatment plant will be located adjacent to the active permitted landfill cells. Landfill
operations currently occupies 45% of the land surface owned by RCL, and approximately another
30% is considered forested swamp (potential wetlands) (Figure 3). Existing ditches are located
throughout the RCL property. There are man-made drainage ditches along the facility perimeter
leading to the Big Marsh Swamp. These ditches are believed to have been installed originally for
agricultural purposes long before the landfill existed. These ditches are now incorporated as part
of the landfill side slope drainage network, as well as general stormwater control throughout the
site and are monitored semi-annually as part of RCL’s subtitle D reporting requirements. A review
of the national wetlands inventory (http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html) indicates
that the site has wetlands throughout the southern part of the property (Figure 3).

Soils in the vicinity of the proposed treatment facility are classified as predominantly Wagram
loamy and Norfolk loamy sands (USDA-NRCS, 2015). Wagram loamy sands are described by
USDA as well drained and minor undrained (5%) consisting of loamy sands to sandy clay loam
subsoil. USDA lists the permeability of these soils ranging from moderately high to high (0.57 to
1.98 inches/hour) depending on the soil horizon. The Norfolk loamy sands are described by USDA
as loamy sands and sandy clay loams and are well drained. USDA lists the permeability of these
soils ranging from moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 inches/hour) depending on the soil
horizon. Both soil types are present on marine terraces. The NCDEQ Stormwater Best
Management Practices (BMP) Manual lists the Wagram and Norfolk soil types as being in soil
groups A/B (NCDEQ, 2007). Soil groups A and B include soils classified as sand, loamy sands,
and silt loams. Other soils located to the south of the proposed treatment facility (Figure 3), such
as the Wakulla sand, have similar infiltration rates to those listed above.

Brown and Caldwell (B&C, 2015) classified the soils at the site as clayey sand or sandy clay (SC),
slightly silty to clean sand (SM), silty fine sands (MH), and clays (CL and CH). Visual
classification indicated complex sequences of interbedded sedimentary deposits with individual
strata ranging from a few inches to a few feet thick. In general, the shallow clay and sandy-clay
strata exhibited permeabilities on the order of 0.014 inches/hour and the sandier strata exhibit
permeabilities on the order of 0.14 inches/hour. Data from the Phase 4 Hydrogeologic Report
(B&C, 2009) indicated that deeper (>40 feet) clayey soils exhibited 0.000014 inches/hour
hydraulic conductivity.

The State's non-discharge rules (15A NCAC 02T Sections 0.0100-0.1600) describe the limitations
for land application (site is not in a Coastal Management area). Although both a high-rate and a
low-rate of infiltration are allowed in non-coastal areas, the high-rate of infiltration would be a
much more involved permitting process. This process would include modeling of the entire area
(a mounding study) undergoing infiltration in order to obtain a permit. Site specific studies of the
infiltration area would be needed to determine an appropriate infiltration rate.

As this exercise is a speculative one at this time, specific property tracts have not been identified
yet for this alternative, and therefore necessary testing has not been performed. Recognizing that
B&C's (2015) work at the Landfill site indicates that moderate conductivity values exist, and may
control soil water movement, HEA has assumed for the purposes of this report that the highest
infiltration rate for low-rate application can be met in soils surrounding the Landfill location. This
rate was used by HEA for preliminary cost estimates for this alternative. If the infiltration rate is
lower as indicated in HEA (2015), then the costs to accomplish infiltration, if possible at all, would
be higher than those estimated below.

The low-rate of infiltration cutoff for designated non-coastal lands is 1.50 gallons of wastewater
effluent per day per square foot of land (per 2T .0702(1)). So, for the application of the 25,000
GPD of leachate discharge at a low rate, at least 16,666 ft2 of property, which equals approximately
2 acres (including buffers and piping), would be required.

The property inside the active landfill site is owned by Robeson County. Adjoining property to the
east is owned by Prestage foods, to the south it is border by unusable swamplands, to the north it
is constrained by NC Highway 20, and on the western border private residences/landowners exist.
Therefore, the land application site would have to be cited within the Robeson County Landfill
property, as no suitable land exists adjacent to the project site. The Robeson County Landfill has
gone through great expense to develop and permit this property to expand the life of the existing
landfill 30 years into the future, which given the buffer requirements (NCDEQ Solid Waste) would
utilize the remaining open property. Additionally, the setback requirements (per 2T .0706) would
mean that the land application site would have to be sited in areas reserved for future landfill
expansion which would cost the landfill $193,600 per square acre.

Based on analysis of samples of leachate water from routine testing at the landfill (Appendix I),
water withdrawn from the leachate system will contain high levels of metals, sulfate, ammonia,
and BOD/COD. Prior to discharging the water on a land application site, these constituents would
be removed to lessen the chances of fouling of the irrigation devices needed to distribute water.
The treatment process will consist of a Reverse Osmosis (RO) system which will treat the waste
stream prior to surface discharge (site plan provided in attached NPDES Permit Application). No
reject water will be sent to the surface irrigation system.

Although it is not known if tracts of land are available for purchase in the area adjacent to the
landfill, this alternative may be technically feasible as a discharge method. In addition to the cost
of purchasing land and the RO System, the discharge alternative of disposal of water via land
application would include the construction and maintenance a pump station, pipelines and a center
pivot irrigation system, and ancillary equipment. The costs associated with Alternative 2 are
discussed in the economic evaluation in Section 4.2.

3.3 Alternative C: Wastewater Reuse

In an RO system, approximately 10-15% of the larger molecules are retained by the membrane as
well as a portion of the water that does not pass through the membrane. This concentrated stream
is called the concentrate or RO reject. It is currently proposed that the Robeson County Landfill
reuse this water by pumping it into a water truck and applying it onto the operating landfill phases
(whereby it will percolate through the waste and/or evaporate). Since this process will not create
any additional effluent streams, 15A NCAC 2U will be satisfied.

In order to reduce the waste stream to effectively a non-discharge system, an evaporative system
could alternatively be employed. The water would be effectively evaporated into the atmosphere
and the solids would be applied to the existing MSW landfill phase. The limiting factor here is
cost, which is presented in Appendix III.

3.4 Alternative D: Direct Discharge to Surface Waters

Alternative D calls for discharge of water to a surface water point. Leachate water is currently
produced via rainwater percolation through the lined landfill phases, and is collected and stored
on-site. Leachate will be pumped from the two (2) 250,000 gallon storage tanks into an
equalization basin at the proposed RO treatment plant, where primary treatment will begin. Once
treated the water will be gravity fed to an abandoned borrow pit whereby further settling (and
secondary treatment as needed) can occur. The only feasible option considered below is where
water is discharged to tributary of Big Marsh Swamp. Feasibility studies for the Big Marsh Swamp
discharge option have already been completed.

Discharged water will travel through a ditch to the borrow pit, then on to an unnamed tributary to
Big Marsh Swamp. The location of the outfall is shown in Figure 1 of the NPDES Permit. This
option would require the construction of a water treatment plant and connections to existing
drainage ditches that lead to the outfall along Big Marsh Swamp. Any required maintenance of the
ditches will be performed, but minor ditch construction may be needed to efficiently connect the
pond to the existing ditches. Compared to other options previously discussed, there would be
minimal infrastructure required for this alternative. Based on the location of this proposed facility
and the volume of water involved, the discharge to surface water through the NPDES program to
Big Marsh Swamp is a viable option. The costs associated with this option are discussed in the
economic evaluation in Section 4.4.

3.5 Alternative E: Combination of Alternatives

The Robeson County Landfill will require some level of control over water withdraws from the
existing leachate storage tanks during normal and emergency operations in order to control the
tank levels. Therefore, some discharge to surface water (Alternative D above) may be required
with any option. Alternative D is the least complicated option, and requires little infrastructure
construction to implement. A combination of another technologically feasible alternative with
Alternative D will be more complicated and costly than utilizing this alternative alone.

As an example of how alternatives can be combined, an economic analysis is presented in Section
4.5 that combines Alternative B (land application) with Alternative C (wastewater reuse). For the
purposes of the analysis, it is assumed that the 25,000 GPD flow will be split evenly between
options.

4.0 EAA Step 4: EVALUATE ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF ALTERNATIVES

Alternatives A(2) through E were all found to be technically feasible in Section 3. The economic
evaluation of each of these options is summarized in Section 4, with cost details presented in
Appendix III. Source data for performing the cost analyses came from a combination of HEA's
project experience, manufacturer's data, and EPA and RS Means projections (Appendix III, pages
4-4 to 4-32). Manufacturer's information used to prepare cost estimates is included in Appendix
III. Preliminary design calculations that form the basis for the land application cost projection is
shown in Appendix VI.

According to the NPDES Unit EAA Guidance Document (NCDENR, 2014)," To provide valid
cost comparisons among all technologically feasible wastewater alternatives identified in STEP 3,
a 20-year Present Value of Costs Analysis (PVCA) must be performed A preliminary design level
effort is considered appropriate for comparing feasible options and their associated costs. For the
PVCA cost comparison, all future expenditures are converted to a present value cost at the
beginning of the 20-year planning period. A discount rate is used in the analysis and represents
the time value of money (the ability of money to earn interest).” This procedure has been followed
in Appendix III and a 20 year PVCA has been performed for each alternative. The discount rate
used in the analysis was obtained from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB, 2014).

In evaluating Alternatives B through E, it is assumed that a condition common to each option will
be the need to pre-treat the leachate waters utilizing a proposed RO system prior to discharge
and/or secondary treatment, to meet discharge restrictions/limits. HEA assumed for cost estimating
purposes that this method will be both applicable and sufficient for each alternative to meet State
standards. This method has been consistently applied to each alternative, after it was found to be
most cost effective through a prior pre-treatment study. The cost for water quality improvements
would likely be higher should additional methods be required to meet State Standards. Prior to
performing this EAA, HEA contacted several RO vendors for pricing and based upon their
responses, it is estimated that the total cost of the RO system will be $1,200,000.

4.1 Connect to an Existing Wastewater Treatment Plant

Alternative A evaluates the disposal of leachate water by establishing a connection to an existing
water treatment plant. The City of Lumberton is the nearest wastewater treatment plant that has
expressed a qualified interest in receiving wastewater from the landfill operation. The major cost
element for disposing of water will be a pipeline capable of conveying a minimum of 100,000
GPD (maximum buildout).

The City of Lumberton’s nearest lift station which would have the ability to convey the wastewater
is located on Barker Ten Mile Road near East Powersville Road. A pipeline needed to transport

wastewater to the City would be about 11.5 miles long and would follow the route along Highway
20 and then south down Barker Ten Mile to the lift station. It is assumed that the pipeline could be
constructed within public rights-of-way. A polymer feed system will have to be constructed so that
the chemical toxicity of the wastewater can be balanced prior to delivery to the City of
Lumberton’s collection system.

4.1.1 Alternative A(2). Connection to the City of Lumberton WWTP

Conceptualized components needed to dispose of wastewater to the City of Lumberton and
corresponding capital costs are listed on Pages 3-1 and 3-2 of Appendix III. These components
include pump stations, road borings, SCADA and controls, a polymer feed system, transmission
piping, valves, and ancillary equipment. Also included are the engineering and labor costs needed
for installation of the force main. Projected O&M costs for Alternative A(2) are shown on Page 3-
2 of Appendix III. The PVCA of Alternative A(2) was found to be $6,287,200.63.

4.2 Alternative B: Disposal by Land Application

Conceptualized components needed to discharge all 25,000 GPD of treated leachate water to a
land application site and corresponding capital costs are listed on Page 3-3 of Appendix III. As
shown on Page 3-3 of Appendix IV, the amount of land needed for discharge of water was adjusted
to 2 acres to allow for buffers and other setbacks. The Robeson County Landfill would have to
utilize currently waste disposal permitted property at the Site, which would cost the County
approximately $40/yd3 at the current tipping fee rate. This would essentially lock up this property
and buffers for the life of the landfill. Wetland and other studies would have to be completed for
the land application site as well, which are included in engineering design costs.

Alternative B includes a reverse osmosis (RO) system for primary waste treatment, a pump station,
a 2,000 foot long pipeline with valves and fittings, 2 acres of land, and irrigation devices. The
approach would rely on pressurized piping to deliver water to center pivot irrigation systems that
would apply water to 1 acre within the 2 acre tract. HEA has assumed that each center pivot
irrigation system could supply water to 1 acres (NC Coop Extension, 1996), so that there would
only need to be 1 system as shown schematically on Page 5-1 of Appendix V. Projected O&M
costs for Alternative B are shown on Page 3-4 of Appendix III. The PVCA of Alternative B was
found to be $3,583,749.46.

4.3 Alternative C: Wastewater Reuse

Conceptualized components needed to evaporate 25,000 GPD, and corresponding capital costs are
listed on page 3-5 of Appendix III. These components include pumping systems, SCADA and
controls, transmission piping, valves, an evaporative system, a pump station. System design, and
SWS permitting compliance are included in the engineering services cost estimate for this
alternative. Projected O&M costs for Alternative C are shown on Page 3-5 of Appendix III. The
PVCA of Alternative C was found to be $4,350,747.52.

4.4 Alternative D: Direct Discharge to Surface Waters

Conceptualized components needed to discharge 25,000 GPD to Big Marsh Swamp and
corresponding capital costs are listed on pages 3-7 and 3-8 of Appendix III. These components
include piping, controls, a reverse osmosis (RO) system, and ditches to convey the water.
Projected O&M costs for Alternative D are shown on Page 3-8 of Appendix III. The PVCA of
Alternative 4 was found to be $1,935,347.77.

4.5 Alternative E: Combination of Alternatives

Conceptualized components needed to land apply and evaporate 25,000 GPD of treated water, and
corresponding capital costs are listed on page 3-9 of Appendix III. These components include
controls, ditches to convey the water, a pump station, SCADA and controls, transmission piping,
valves, and a RO system. Projected O&M costs for Alternative 5 are shown on Page 3-10 of
Appendix III. The PVCA of Alternative E was found to be $5,128,827.98.

4.6 Results of Analysis of Economic Alternatives

The present worth estimates of alternatives evaluated in this EAA are:

Alternative A(2) Connection to the City of Lumberton WWTP PVCA = $6,287,200.63
Alternative B Disposal by Land Application PVCA = $3,583,749.46
Alternative C Wastewater Reuse PVCA = $4,350,747.52
Alternative D Direct Discharge to Surface Waters PVCA = $1,935,347.77
Alternative E Combination of Alternatives PVCA = $5,128,827.98

The Alternative that has the most favorable economic impact is Alternative D - Discharge to Big
Marsh Swamp. Alternative D has a PVCA of $1,935,347.77. The cost of Alternative D is
substantially less than the next closest alternative (Alternative B). The most costly alternative is
connection to the City of Lumberton WWTP (Alternative A(2)) because of the costs associated
with infrastructure needs (piping and irrigation equipment) due to the distance away from the
site.

5.0 Local Government Review Form

This form is not required in this situation since this is a minor permit and is being submitted by a
government entity.

6.0 References

AWWNASCE, American Water Works Association and American Society of Civil Engineers,
Water Treatment Plant Design, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, 2012.

Weaver, Curtis, USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center, Personal Communication, July 27,
2015.

Joyce Engineering, Inc., July, 2015, report titled "Phase 5 Design Hydrogeologic Report", 303
pages.

NC Coop. Extension Service, March 1996, "Irrigation System Characteristics and Costs",
Publication Number EBAE 178-93; accessed through https://www.bae.ncsu.edu/extension/ext-
publications/waste/wastewater/ebae-178-93-system-costs.pdf.

NCDENR Division of Water Quality, North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A,
Subchapter 02T, Sections 0.0100-0.1600, "Waste Not Discharged To Surface Waters", effective
September 1, 2006.

NCDENR Division of Water Quality, Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual, July
2007, Revised through 2012.

NCDENR, Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) Guidance Document, Division of Water
Quality, NPDES Unit, http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swp/ps/nodes, June 23, 2005.

OMB, Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President, 2015 Discount
Rates for OMB Circular no. A-94, January 21, 2015.

RS Means, Heavy Construction Cost Data, 22nd ed., 2008.

Southeast Regional Climate Center, 2012,
http://www.sercc.com/climateinfo_files/monthly/North%20Carolina_prcp_DivNew.htm.

U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service (USDA-SCS), 1989, Soil Survey of
Robeson County, North Carolina.

USGS, Rainfall Report, http://waterwatch.usgs.gov/?m=real&r=nc, 2015.

FIGURES

EAA
ROBESON COUNTY LANDFILL
ST. PAULS, NORTH CAROLINA
11/2015

Figure 1
Site Location of
Robeson County Landfill

Robeson
County
Landfill

EAA
ROBESON COUNTY LANDFILL
ST. PAULS, NORTH CAROLINA
11/2015

Figure 2
Map of WWTPs near
Robeson County Landfill

City of Lumberton WWTP
Robeson County Landfill
St. Pauls WWTP
Proposed Force Main
Soil Map—Robeson County, North Carolina
(RCL)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
1/4/2016
Page 1 of 3
38
5
1
1
0
0
38
5
1
4
0
0
38
5
1
7
0
0
38
5
2
0
0
0
38
5
2
3
0
0
38
5
2
6
0
0
38
5
1
1
0
0
38
5
1
4
0
0
38
5
1
7
0
0
38
5
2
0
0
0
38
5
2
3
0
0
38
5
2
6
0
0
38
5
2
9
0
0
689600 689900 690200 690500 690800 691100 691400 691700 692000 692300
689600 689900 690200 690500 690800 691100 691400 691700 692000 692300
34° 48' 1'' N
78
°

5
5
'

4
3
'
'

W
34° 48' 1'' N
78
°

5
3
'

5
1
'
'

W
34° 47' 1'' N
78
°

5
5
'

4
3
'
'

W
34° 47' 1'' N
78
°

5
3
'

5
1
'
'

W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
0 500 1000 2000 3000
Feet
0 150 300 600 900
Meters
Map Scale: 1:12,900 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Robeson County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 13, Sep 29, 2015
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 7, 2010—Apr 3,
2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Soil Map—Robeson County, North Carolina
(RCL)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
1/4/2016
Page 2 of 3
Map Unit Legend
Robeson County, North Carolina (NC155)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
GoA Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes, Southern
Coastal Plain
10.9 3.1%
JT Johnston soils 6.5 1.9%
Mc McColl loam 18.4 5.3%
NoA Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes
51.0 14.6%
NsC Norfolk and Faceville soils, 6 to
10 percent slopes
16.9 4.8%
Pg Pantego fine sandy loam 13.7 3.9%
PoB Pocalla loamy sand, 0 to 3
percent slopes
5.3 1.5%
Ra Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes
5.3 1.5%
W Water 0.1 0.0%
WaB Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6
percent slopes
192.7 54.9%
WkB Wakulla sand, 0 to 6 percent
slopes
29.9 8.5%
Totals for Area of Interest 350.8 100.0%
Soil Map—Robeson County, North Carolina RCL
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
1/4/2016
Page 3 of 3

APPENDIX I: ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.SAMPLE RESULTS - 27
L801958
LEACHATE PHASE 2
Collected date/time: 11/18/15 15:10
Wet Chemistry by Method 365.4
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
Phosphorus,Total 3.08 0.100 1 11/27/2015 15:29 WG830333
Wet Chemistry by Method 410.4
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
COD 1300 100 10 11/23/2015 13:45 WG830753
Wet Chemistry by Method 5210 B-2011
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
BOD 8.90 3.33 1 11/24/2015 10:53 WG830211
Wet Chemistry by Method 9056MOD
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
Nitrate 1.33 0.100 1 11/20/2015 13:17 WG830498
Sulfate 736 500 100 11/24/2015 10:35 WG830779
Metals (ICPMS) by Method 6020
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
Antimony 0.0708 0.0180 9 11/23/2015 13:28 WG830587
Arsenic 0.213 0.0180 9 11/23/2015 13:28 WG830587
Beryllium ND 0.0180 9 11/23/2015 13:28 WG830587
Cadmium ND 0.00900 9 11/23/2015 13:28 WG830587
Copper 0.311 0.0450 9 11/23/2015 13:28 WG830587
Lead 0.162 0.0180 9 11/23/2015 13:28 WG830587
Selenium ND 0.0180 9 11/23/2015 13:28 WG830587
Thallium ND 0.0180 9 11/23/2015 13:28 WG830587
Zinc ND 0.225 9 11/23/2015 13:28 WG830587
Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) by Method 8260B
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
Acetone 0.110 0.0500 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Acrylonitrile ND J4 0.0100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Benzene 0.00436 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Bromochloromethane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Bromodichloromethane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Bromoform ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Bromomethane ND 0.00500 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Carbon disulfide ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Carbon tetrachloride ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Chlorobenzene 0.00152 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Chlorodibromomethane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Chloroethane ND 0.00500 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Chloroform ND 0.00500 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Chloromethane ND 0.00250 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Dibromomethane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.00585 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene ND 0.00250 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
1,1-Dichloroethane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
1 Cp
2Tc
3Ss
4Cn
5Sr
6Qc
7Gl
8Al
9Sc
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates 14-011550 L801958 12/01/15 20:38 60 of 101
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates 14-011550 L801958 12/02/15 12:56 60 of 101
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.SAMPLE RESULTS - 27
L801958
LEACHATE PHASE 2
Collected date/time: 11/18/15 15:10
Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) by Method 8260B
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
1,1-Dichloroethene ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
1,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Ethylbenzene 0.00790 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
2-Hexanone ND 0.0100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Iodomethane ND 0.0100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
2-Butanone (MEK)0.0828 0.0100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Methylene Chloride ND 0.00500 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ND 0.0100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Styrene ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Tetrachloroethene ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Toluene ND 0.00500 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Trichloroethene ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Trichlorofluoromethane ND 0.00500 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 0.00250 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Vinyl acetate ND 0.0100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Vinyl chloride ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
Xylenes, Total 0.0262 0.00300 1 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
(S) Toluene-d8 107 90.0-115 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
(S) Dibromofluoromethane 26.5 J2 79.0-121 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
(S) a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene 114 90.4-116 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
(S) 4-Bromofluorobenzene 106 80.1-120 11/21/2015 10:15 WG830461
1 Cp
2Tc
3Ss
4Cn
5Sr
6Qc
7Gl
8Al
9Sc
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates 14-011550 L801958 12/01/15 20:38 61 of 101
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates 14-011550 L801958 12/02/15 12:56 61 of 101
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.SAMPLE RESULTS - 28
L801958
LEACHATE PHASE 3
Collected date/time: 11/18/15 15:15
Wet Chemistry by Method 365.4
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
Phosphorus,Total 0.534 0.100 1 11/27/2015 15:30 WG830333
Wet Chemistry by Method 410.4
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
COD 427 100 10 11/23/2015 13:45 WG830753
Wet Chemistry by Method 5210 B-2011
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
BOD 26.4 10.0 1 11/24/2015 10:56 WG830211
Wet Chemistry by Method 9056MOD
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
Nitrate 0.415 0.100 1 11/20/2015 13:32 WG830498
Sulfate 50.9 5.00 1 11/20/2015 13:32 WG830498
Metals (ICPMS) by Method 6020
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
Antimony ND 0.0180 9 11/23/2015 13:31 WG830587
Arsenic 0.0269 0.0180 9 11/23/2015 13:31 WG830587
Beryllium ND 0.0180 9 11/23/2015 13:31 WG830587
Cadmium ND 0.00900 9 11/23/2015 13:31 WG830587
Copper 0.0547 0.0450 9 11/23/2015 13:31 WG830587
Lead ND 0.0180 9 11/23/2015 13:31 WG830587
Selenium ND 0.0180 9 11/23/2015 13:31 WG830587
Thallium ND 0.0180 9 11/23/2015 13:31 WG830587
Zinc ND 0.225 9 11/23/2015 13:31 WG830587
Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) by Method 8260B
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
Acetone 0.0998 0.0500 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Acrylonitrile ND J4 0.0100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Benzene 0.00589 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Bromochloromethane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Bromodichloromethane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Bromoform ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Bromomethane ND 0.00500 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Carbon disulfide ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Carbon tetrachloride ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Chlorobenzene 0.00208 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Chlorodibromomethane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Chloroethane ND 0.00500 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Chloroform ND 0.00500 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Chloromethane ND 0.00250 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Dibromomethane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0121 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene ND 0.00250 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
1,1-Dichloroethane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
1 Cp
2Tc
3Ss
4Cn
5Sr
6Qc
7Gl
8Al
9Sc
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates 14-011550 L801958 12/01/15 20:38 62 of 101
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates 14-011550 L801958 12/02/15 12:56 62 of 101
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.SAMPLE RESULTS - 28
L801958
LEACHATE PHASE 3
Collected date/time: 11/18/15 15:15
Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) by Method 8260B
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
1,1-Dichloroethene ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
1,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Ethylbenzene 0.0232 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
2-Hexanone ND 0.0100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Iodomethane ND 0.0100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
2-Butanone (MEK)0.124 0.0100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Methylene Chloride ND 0.00500 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ND 0.0100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Styrene ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Tetrachloroethene ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Toluene 0.00723 0.00500 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Trichloroethene ND 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Trichlorofluoromethane ND 0.00500 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 0.00250 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Vinyl acetate ND 0.0100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Vinyl chloride 0.00120 0.00100 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
Xylenes, Total 0.0806 0.00300 1 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
(S) Toluene-d8 105 90.0-115 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
(S) Dibromofluoromethane 90.7 79.0-121 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
(S) a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene 113 90.4-116 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
(S) 4-Bromofluorobenzene 108 80.1-120 11/21/2015 10:33 WG830461
1 Cp
2Tc
3Ss
4Cn
5Sr
6Qc
7Gl
8Al
9Sc
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates 14-011550 L801958 12/01/15 20:38 63 of 101
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates 14-011550 L801958 12/02/15 12:56 63 of 101
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.SAMPLE RESULTS - 29
L801958
LEACHATE PHASE 4
Collected date/time: 11/18/15 15:50
Wet Chemistry by Method 365.4
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
Phosphorus,Total 0.279 0.100 1 11/27/2015 15:31 WG830333
Wet Chemistry by Method 410.4
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
COD 3920 100 10 11/23/2015 13:45 WG830753
Wet Chemistry by Method 5210 B-2011
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
BOD 2310 1000 10 11/24/2015 11:01 WG830211
Wet Chemistry by Method 9056MOD
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
Nitrate ND 0.100 1 11/20/2015 13:48 WG830498
Sulfate 99.1 5.00 1 11/20/2015 13:48 WG830498
Metals (ICPMS) by Method 6020
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
Antimony ND 0.0180 9 11/23/2015 13:33 WG830587
Arsenic 0.0704 0.0180 9 11/23/2015 13:33 WG830587
Beryllium ND 0.0180 9 11/23/2015 13:33 WG830587
Cadmium ND 0.00900 9 11/23/2015 13:33 WG830587
Copper ND 0.0450 9 11/23/2015 13:33 WG830587
Lead ND 0.0180 9 11/23/2015 13:33 WG830587
Selenium ND 0.0180 9 11/23/2015 13:33 WG830587
Thallium ND 0.0180 9 11/23/2015 13:33 WG830587
Zinc ND 0.225 9 11/23/2015 13:33 WG830587
Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) by Method 8260B
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
Acetone 2.61 0.500 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Acrylonitrile ND 0.100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Benzene ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Bromochloromethane ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Bromodichloromethane ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Bromoform ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Bromomethane ND 0.0500 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Carbon disulfide ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Carbon tetrachloride ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Chlorobenzene ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Chlorodibromomethane ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Chloroethane ND 0.0500 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Chloroform ND 0.0500 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Chloromethane ND 0.0250 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Dibromomethane ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene ND 0.0250 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
1,1-Dichloroethane ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
1 Cp
2Tc
3Ss
4Cn
5Sr
6Qc
7Gl
8Al
9Sc
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates 14-011550 L801958 12/01/15 20:38 64 of 101
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates 14-011550 L801958 12/02/15 12:56 64 of 101
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.SAMPLE RESULTS - 29
L801958
LEACHATE PHASE 4
Collected date/time: 11/18/15 15:50
Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) by Method 8260B
Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/l mg/l date / time
1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
1,1-Dichloroethene ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
1,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Ethylbenzene 0.0116 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
2-Hexanone ND 0.100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Iodomethane ND 0.100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
2-Butanone (MEK)3.05 0.100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Methylene Chloride ND 0.0500 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ND 0.100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Styrene ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Tetrachloroethene ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Toluene ND 0.0500 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Trichloroethene ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Trichlorofluoromethane ND 0.0500 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 0.0250 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Vinyl acetate ND 0.100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Vinyl chloride ND 0.0100 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
Xylenes, Total ND 0.0300 10 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
(S) Toluene-d8 102 90.0-115 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
(S) Dibromofluoromethane 102 79.0-121 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
(S) a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene 106 90.4-116 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
(S) 4-Bromofluorobenzene 105 80.1-120 12/01/2015 10:02 WG832427
1 Cp
2Tc
3Ss
4Cn
5Sr
6Qc
7Gl
8Al
9Sc
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates 14-011550 L801958 12/01/15 20:38 65 of 101
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates 14-011550 L801958 12/02/15 12:56 65 of 101

APPENDIX II: OMB DISCOUNT RATE

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503

THE DIRECTOR
January 21, 2015
M-15-05
MEMORANDUM FORT
FROM:
SUBJECT: 2015 Discount Rates for OMB Circular No. A-94
On October 29, 1992, OMB issued a revision to OMB Circular No. A-94, "Guidelines
and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs." The revision established
new discount rate guidelines for use in benefit-cost and other types of economic analysis.
The revised Circular specifies certain discount rates that will be updated ai:mually when
the interest rate and inflation assumptions in the budget are changed. These discount rates are
found in Appendix C ofthe revised Circular. The attachment to this memorandum is an update
ofAppendix C. It provides discount rates that will be in effect for the calendar year 2015.
The rates presented in Appendix C do not apply to regulatory analysis or benefit-cost
analysis ofpublic investment. They are to be used for lease-purchase and cost-effectiveness
analysis, as specified in the Circular.
Attachment
OMB Circular No. A-94
APPENDIXC
(Revised December 2014)
DISCOUNT RATES FOR COST-EFFECTIVENESS, LEASE PURCHASE,

AND RELATED ANALYSES

Effective Dates. This appendix is updated annually. This version of the appendix is valid for
calendar year 2015. A copy ofthe updated appendix can be obtained in electronic form through the
OMB home page at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars a094/a94 appx-c/. The text ofthe
Circular is found athttp://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars a094/, and a table ofpast years' rates
is located at http://www. whitehouse. gov Isites/ default/files/ omb/ assets/ a94/ dischist. pdf. Updates of
the appendix are also available upon request from OMB 's Office of Economic Policy (202-395­
3316).
Nominal Discount Rates. A forecast of nominal or market interest rates for calendar year 2015
based on the economic assumptions for the 2016 Budget is presented below. These nominal rates are
to be used for discounting nominal flows, which are often encountered in lease-purchase analysis.
Nominal Interest Rates on Treasury Notes and Bonds
of Specified Maturities (in percent)
3-Year 5-Year 7-Year 10-Year 20-Year 30-Year
1.7 2.2 2.5 2.8 3.1 3.4
Real Discount Rates. A forecast of real interest rates from which the inflation premium has been
removed and based on the economic assumptions from the 2016 Budget is presented below. These
real rates are to be used for discounting constant-dollar flows, as is often required in cost­
effectiveness analysis.
Real Interest Rates on Treasury Notes and Bonds
of Specified Maturities (in percent)
3-Year 5-Year 7-Year 10-Year 20-Year 30-Year
0.1 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.4
Analyses ofprograms with terms different from those presented above may use a linear interpolation.
For example, a four-year project can be evaluated with a rate equal to the average ofthe three-year
and five-year rates. Programs with durations longer than 30 years may use the 30-year interest rate.

APPENDIX III: COSTING ANALYSIS

It
e
m

D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Un
i
t

Q
u
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t

P
r
i
c
e

T
o
t
a
l

P
r
i
c
e
pi
p
e

-

4
"

t
o

C
i
t
y

o
f

L
u
m
b
e
r
t
o
n

(
1
1
.
5

m
i
l
e
s
)
L.
F
.

6
0
7
2
0
.
0
0

4
6
.
0
0
$

2
,
7
9
3
,
1
2
0
.
0
0
$

fi
t
t
i
n
g
s

-

4
"
E.
A
.

2
4
.
0
0

1
1
.
7
3
$

2
8
1
.
5
2
$

va
l
v
e
s

-

4
"
E.
A
.

1
2
.
0
0

6
0
0
.
0
0
$

7
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$

Mo
t
o
r

a
c
t
u
a
t
e
d

v
a
l
v
e
s

-

4
"
E.
A
.

2
.
0
0

8
8
0
.
8
6
$

1
,
7
6
1
.
7
2
$

Ai
r

R
e
l
e
a
s
e

V
a
v
l
e
s
E.
A
.

5
.
0
0

5
,
2
2
0
.
0
0
$

2
6
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$

Bl
o
w
-
o
f
f
s
E.
A
.

3
.
0
0

3
,
2
4
8
.
0
0
$

9
,
7
4
4
.
0
0
$

po
l
y
m
e
r

f
e
e
d

s
y
s
t
e
m
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

1
1
6
,
8
7
0
.
0
0
$

1
1
6
,
8
7
0
.
0
0
$

SC
A
D
A
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

1
6
,
2
4
0
.
0
0
$

1
6
,
2
4
0
.
0
0
$

Pu
m
p
s
/
S
t
a
t
i
o
n

P
i
p
i
n
g
E.
A
.

3
.
0
0

2
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$

6
7
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$

ro
a
d
/
R
R

b
o
r
e
E.
A
.

3
0
.
0
0

3
0
,
1
6
0
.
0
0
$

9
0
4
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$

Am
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t

t
o

L
e
a
c
h
a
t
e

M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t

P
l
a
n
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

Er
o
s
i
o
n

C
o
n
t
r
o
l
F.
T
.

6
0
7
2
0
.
0
0

2
.
2
4
$

1
3
6
,
0
1
2
.
8
0
$

Te
s
t
i
n
g
F.
T
.

6
0
7
2
0
.
0
0

2
.
0
0
$

1
2
1
,
4
4
0
.
0
0
$

Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r

M
o
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

9
.
0
0
%

3
7
8
,
3
6
6
.
3
0
$

En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
/
S
u
r
v
e
y

&

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
t
i
o
n

A
d
m
i
n
.
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

1
0
.
0
0
%

4
5
8
,
2
4
3
.
6
3
$

Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n

C
o
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
c
y
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

1
0
.
0
0
%

5
0
4
,
0
6
8
.
0
0
$

5,
5
4
4
,
7
4
7
.
9
8
$

10
0
gp
m
1
ft

p
e
r

1
0
0

f
t

5

f
t
75
ps
i

2
0
0

f
t
5
ft

5

f
t
to
t
a
l

2
1
0

f
t

T
D
H
70
%
90
%15

H
P
40

K
W
Mo
t
o
r

E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y

a
s
s
u
m
e
d

t
o

b
e
HP

r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
KW

r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
Pu
m
p

E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y

a
s
s
u
m
e
d

t
o

b
e
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

A
(
2
)
:

C
o
n
n
e
c
t

t
o

C
i
t
y

o
f

L
u
m
b
e
r
t
o
n

W
W
T
P
Pi
p
i
n
g

a
n
d

S
y
s
t
e
m

C
o
s
t
s
To

t
h
e

C
i
t
y

o
f

L
u
m
b
e
r
t
o
n

(
2
5
,
0
0
0

G
P
D

-

1
1
.
5

m
i
l
e
s
,

F
i
g
u
r
e

2
)
To
t
a
l

C
a
p
i
t
a
l

C
o
s
t

o
f

A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

D
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g

P
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
s

A
f
f
e
c
t
i
n
g

C
o
s
t
Pu
m
p

S
t
a
t
i
o
n
Fr
i
c
t
i
o
n

L
o
s
s
De
l
i
v
e
r
y

P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e

R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

H
e
a
d
O&
M

C
o
s
t
s
0.
0
9
$

(
a
s
s
u
m
e
d
)
0.
3
5
$

25
,
0
0
0

3
,
1
9
3
.
7
5
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
45
.
0
0
$

pe
r

h
o
u
r

4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
2,
1
6
0
.
0
0
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
1,
0
8
0
.
0
0
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
39
,
4
3
6
.
1
7
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
50
,
3
6
9
.
9
2
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
Pr
e
s
e
n
t

V
a
l
u
e

C
o
s
t
s

A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
:
Wh
e
r
e
:
PV

=

P
r
e
s
e
n
t

v
a
l
u
e

o
f

c
o
s
t
s
.
C o
=

C
o
s
t
s

i
n
c
u
r
r
e
d

i
n

t
h
e

p
r
e
s
e
n
t

y
e
a
r
.
C

=

C
o
s
t
s

i
n
c
u
r
r
e
d

y
e
a
r
l
y
n

=

E
n
d
i
n
g

y
e
a
r

o
f

t
h
e

l
i
f
e

o
f

t
h
e

f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
.
n
=

2
0

y
e
a
r

p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g

p
e
r
i
o
d
r

=

C
u
r
r
e
n
t

E
P
A

d
i
s
c
o
u
n
t

r
a
t
e
.

20
1
4

d
i
s
c
o
u
n
t

r
a
t
e

i
n

O
M
B

C
i
r
c
u
l
a
r

A
-
9
4

=

3
.
1
%

(
O
M
B
,

2
0
1
4
)
PV
=
+

5
0
,
3
6
9
.
9
2
$

x
Pr
e
s
e
n
t

V
a
l
u
e

o
f

A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

B
PV

=
6,
2
8
7
,
2
0
0
.
6
3
$

[0
.
0
3
1
(
1

+

0
.
0
3
1
)
20
]
Mo
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

L
a
b
o
r
Ot
h
e
r

S
y
s
t
e
m

M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e

-

A
s
s
u
m
e

1
%

o
f

C
a
p
i
t
a
l

C
o
s
t

o
f

E
q
u
i
m
e
n
t
a
n
d

P
i
p
e
To
t
a
l

O
&
M

C
o
s
t

o
f

A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

B
5,
5
4
4
,
7
4
7
.
9
8
$

[1

+

.
0
3
1
)
20
-

1
]
An
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l

C
o
s
t
s
po
w
e
r

c
o
s
t

p
e
r

K
W
-
H
r
pu
m
p
i
n
g

c
o
s
t
s

f
r
o
m

s
u
m
p

p
e
r

1
0
0
0

g
a
l
l
o
n
s
pu
m
p
i
n
g

c
o
s
t
s

f
r
o
m

s
u
m
p

G
P
D
op
e
r
a
t
o
r

1
0
0

h
o
u
r
s
/
y
e
a
r
PV

C o

C
(1

r )n

1
r (1

r )n


Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d

A
c
r
e
s

N
e
e
d
e
d

1

a
c
r
e
Co
s
t

o
f

L
a
n
d

i
s

$
4
0

y d 3
of

A
i
r
s
p ac
e

=

$
4
0

x

4
8
4
0
=

$
1
9
3
,
6
0
0
pe
r

a
c
r
e
Co
s
t

o
f

a
c
e
r
a
g
e

r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d

=

$
1
9
3
,
6
0
0

x

2
=

$
3
8
7
,
2
0
0
It
e
m

D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Un
i
t

Q
u
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t

P
r
i
c
e

T
o
t
a
l

P
r
i
c
e
p ip
e

-

1
2
"
L.
F
.

2
0
0
0
.
0
0

2
7
7
.
8
0
$

5
5
5
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$

p ip
e

-

8
"
L.
F
.

5
0
0
.
0
0

1
2
4
.
0
0
$

6
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

p ip
e

-

6
"
L.
F
.

1
0
0
.
0
0

8
1
.
6
0
$

8
,
1
6
0
.
0
0
$

p ip
e

-

4
"
L.
F
.

1
0
0
0
.
0
0

4
6
.
0
0
$

4
6
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

va
l
v
e
s

-

4
"
L.
F
.

4
.
0
0

6
0
0
.
0
0
$

2
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$

fi
t
t
i
n
g
s

-

1
2
"
E.
A
.

2
.
0
0

1
8
2
.
2
6
$

3
6
4
.
5
2
$

fi
t
t
i
n
g
s

-

8
"
E.
A
.

2
.
0
0

6
2
.
0
8
$

1
2
4
.
1
6
$

fi
t
t
i
n
g
s

-

6
"
E.
A
.

2
.
0
0

3
7
.
0
3
$

7
4
.
0
6
$

fi
t
t
i
n
g
s

-

4
"
E.
A
.

6
.
0
0

1
1
.
7
3
$

7
0
.
3
8
$

Ce
n
t
e
r

P
i
v
o
t

I
r
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

S
y
s
t
e
m
,

1

a
c
r
e
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

1
7
,
2
7
0
.
0
0
$

1
7
,
2
7
0
.
0
0
$

Ai
r

R
e
l
e
a
s
e

V
a
l
v
e
s
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

5
,
2
2
0
.
0
0
$

5
,
2
2
0
.
0
0
$

Pu
m
p

H
o
u
s
e
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

3
9
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$

3
9
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$

El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
/
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
s
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

5
5
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$

5
5
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$

Pu
m
p
s
/
S
t
a
t
i
o
n

P
i
p
i
n
g
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

4
9
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$

4
9
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$

No
n
-
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e

P
e
r
m
i
t

F
e
e
s
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

8
1
0
.
0
0
$

8
1
0
.
0
0
$

Am
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t

t
o

L
e
a
c
h
a
t
e

M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t

P
l
a
n
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

Er
o
s
i
o
n

C
o
n
t
r
o
l
F.
T
.

5
0
0
0
.
0
0

2
.
2
4
$

1
1
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$

Te
s
t
i
n
g
F.
T
.

5
0
0
0
.
0
0

2
.
0
0
$

1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r

M
o
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

9
.
0
0
%

7
7
,
9
5
7
.
3
8
$

En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
/
S
u
r
v
e
y

&

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
t
i
o
n

A
d
m
i
n
.
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

1
0
.
0
0
%

9
4
,
4
1
5
.
0
5
$

Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n

C
o
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
c
y
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

1
0
.
0
0
%

1
0
3
,
8
5
6
.
5
6
$

1,
5
2
9
,
6
2
2
.
1
1
$

2,
7
2
9
,
6
2
2
.
1
1
$

To
t
a
l

C
a
p
i
t
a
l

C
o
s
t

o
f

A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

B

+

R
O

S
y
s
t
e
m
To
t
a
l

C
a
p
i
t
a
l

C
o
s
t

o
f

A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

B
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

B
:

D
i
s
p
o
s
a
l

b
y

L
a
n
d

A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
Co
s
t

o
f

L
a
n
d
Pi
p
i
n
g

a
n
d

S
p
r
a
y
f
i
e
l
d

C
o
s
t
s
25
gp
m
1
ft

p
e
r

1
0
0

f
t

2
0
0

f
t
60
ps
i

5
0

f
t
10
ft

1
0

f
t
to
t
a
l

f
t

T
D
H
70 90 7.
5

H
P
20

K
W
0.
0
9
$

(
a
s
s
u
m
e
d
)
0.
3
5
$

0.
4
7
$

25
,
0
0
0

3
,
1
9
3
.
7
5
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
25
,
0
0
0

4
,
2
8
8
.
7
5
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
45
.
0
0
$

pe
r

h
o
u
r

4
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
3,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
1,
0
8
0
.
0
0
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
81
0
.
0
0
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
57
3
.
7
3
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
57
,
9
4
6
.
2
3
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
Pr
e
s
e
n
t

V
a
l
u
e

C
o
s
t
s

A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
:
Wh
e
r
e
:
PV

=

P
r
e
s
e
n
t

v
a
l
u
e

o
f

c
o
s
t
s
.
C o
=

C
o
s
t
s

i
n
c
u
r
r
e
d

i
n

t
h
e

p
r
e
s
e
n
t

y
e
a
r
.
C

=

C
o
s
t
s

i
n
c
u
r
r
e
d

y
e
a
r
l
y
n

=

E
n
d
i
n
g

y
e
a
r

o
f

t
h
e

l
i
f
e

o
f

t
h
e

f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
.
n
=

2
0

y
e
a
r

p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g

p
e
r
i
o
d
r

=

C
u
r
r
e
n
t

E
P
A

d
i
s
c
o
u
n
t

r
a
t
e
.

20
1
4

d
i
s
c
o
u
n
t

r
a
t
e

i
n

O
M
B

C
i
r
c
u
l
a
r

A
-
9
4

=

3
.
1
%

(
O
M
B
,

2
0
1
4
)
PV
=
+

5
7
,
9
4
6
.
2
3
$

x
Pr
e
s
e
n
t

V
a
l
u
e

o
f

A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

B
PV

=
3,
5
8
3
,
7
4
9
.
4
6
$

O&
M

C
o
s
t
s
[1

+

.
0
3
1
)
20
-

1
]
[0
.
0
3
1
(
1

+

0
.
0
3
1
)
20
]
2,
7
2
9
,
6
2
2
.
1
1
$

pe
r

1
0
0
0

g
a
l
l
o
n
s
pe
r

1
0
0
0

g
a
l
l
o
n
s
GP
D
GP
D
10
0
0

h
o
u
r
s
/
y
e
a
r
To
t
a
l

O
&
M

C
o
s
t

o
f

A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

B
po
w
e
r

c
o
s
t
pu
m
p
i
n
g

c
o
s
t
s

f
r
o
m

s
u
m
p
pu
m
p
i
n
g

c
o
s
t
s

t
o

l
a
n
d

a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
pu
m
p
i
n
g

c
o
s
t
s

f
r
o
m

s
u
m
p
pu
m
p
i
n
g

c
o
s
t
s

f
o
r

l
a
n
d

a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
op
e
r
a
t
o
r
An
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l

C
o
s
t
s
Mo
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

L
a
b
o
r
Pe
r
m
i
t

F
e
e
s
Ot
h
e
r

S
y
s
t
e
m

M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e

-

A
s
s
u
m
e

1
%

o
f

C
a
p
i
t
a
l

C
o
s
t

o
f

E
q
u
i
m
e
n
t
a
n
d

P
i
p
e
pe
r

K
W
-
H
r
Pu
m
p

E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y

a
s
s
u
m
e
d

t
o

b
e
Mo
t
o
r

E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y

a
s
s
u
m
e
d

t
o

b
e
HP

r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
KW

r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g

P
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
s

A
f
f
e
c
t
i
n
g

C
o
s
t
Fr
i
c
t
i
o
n

L
o
s
s
De
l
i
v
e
r
y

P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e

R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

H
e
a
d
Pu
m
p

S
t
a
t
i
o
n

2
5
,
0
0
0

G
P
D

=
PV

C o

C
(1

r )n

1
r (1

r )n


It
e
m

D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Un
i
t

Q
u
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t

P
r
i
c
e

T
o
t
a
l

P
r
i
c
e
pi
p
e

-

6
"
L.
F
.

1
0
0
.
0
0

8
1
.
6
0
$

8
,
1
6
0
.
0
0
$

fi
t
t
i
n
g
s

-

6
"
E.
A
.

2
.
0
0

3
7
.
0
3
$

7
4
.
0
6
$

Pu
m
p

H
o
u
s
e
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

3
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

3
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
/
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
s
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

5
5
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$

5
5
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$

Pu
m
p
s
/
S
t
a
t
i
o
n

P
i
p
i
n
g
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

3
9
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$

3
9
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$

Ev
a
p
o
r
a
t
i
v
e

S
y
s
t
e
m

(
1
0
0
%

W
a
t
e
r
)
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

1
,
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

1
,
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

Am
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t

t
o

L
e
a
c
h
a
t
e

M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t

P
l
a
n
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

Er
o
s
i
o
n

C
o
n
t
r
o
l
F.
T
.

1
5
0
.
0
0

2
.
2
4
$

3
3
6
.
0
0
$

Te
s
t
i
n
g
F.
T
.

1
5
0
.
0
0

2
.
0
0
$

3
0
0
.
0
0
$

Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r

M
o
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

9
.
0
0
%

1
5
6
,
7
3
2
.
3
1
$

En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
/
S
u
r
v
e
y

&

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
t
i
o
n

A
d
m
i
n
.
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

1
0
.
0
0
%

1
8
9
,
8
2
0
.
2
4
$

Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n

C
o
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
c
y
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

1
0
.
0
0
%

2
0
8
,
8
0
2
.
2
6
$

2,
2
9
6
,
8
2
4
.
8
6
$

3,
4
9
6
,
8
2
4
.
8
6
$

25
gp
m
1
ft

p
e
r

1
0
0

f
t

1
0
0

f
t
60
ps
i

2
5

f
t
10
ft

1
0

f
t
to
t
a
l

f
t

T
D
H
70 90 7.
5

H
P
20

K
W
Mo
t
o
r

E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y

a
s
s
u
m
e
d

t
o

b
e
HP

r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
KW

r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
Pu
m
p

S
t
a
t
i
o
n

2
5
,
0
0
0

G
P
D

f
r
o
m

L
e
a
c
h
a
t
e

T
a
n
k
s

t
o

P
l
a
n
t

=
Fr
i
c
t
i
o
n

L
o
s
s
De
l
i
v
e
r
y

P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e

R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

H
e
a
d
Pu
m
p

E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y

a
s
s
u
m
e
d

t
o

b
e
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

C
:

W
a
t
e
r

R
e
u
s
e
Pi
p
i
n
g
,

S
y
s
t
e
m
,

a
n
d

D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e

C
o
s
t
s
To
t
a
l

C
a
p
i
t
a
l

C
o
s
t

o
f

A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

C
To
t
a
l

C
a
p
i
t
a
l

C
o
s
t

o
f

A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

C

+

R
O

S
y
s
t
e
m
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g

P
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
s

A
f
f
e
c
t
i
n
g

C
o
s
t
0.
0
9
$

(
a
s
s
u
m
e
d
)
0.
3
5
$

25
,
0
0
0

3
,
1
9
3
.
7
5
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
45
.
0
0
$

pe
r

h
o
u
r

4
9
,
2
7
5
.
0
0
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
3,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
1,
0
8
0
.
0
0
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
81
0
.
0
0
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
57
3
.
5
9
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
57
,
9
3
2
.
3
4
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
Pr
e
s
e
n
t

V
a
l
u
e

C
o
s
t
s

A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
:
Wh
e
r
e
:
PV

=

P
r
e
s
e
n
t

v
a
l
u
e

o
f

c
o
s
t
s
.
C o
=

C
o
s
t
s

i
n
c
u
r
r
e
d

i
n

t
h
e

p
r
e
s
e
n
t

y
e
a
r
.
C

=

C
o
s
t
s

i
n
c
u
r
r
e
d

y
e
a
r
l
y
n

=

E
n
d
i
n
g

y
e
a
r

o
f

t
h
e

l
i
f
e

o
f

t
h
e

f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
.
n
=

2
0

y
e
a
r

p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g

p
e
r
i
o
d
r

=

C
u
r
r
e
n
t

E
P
A

d
i
s
c
o
u
n
t

r
a
t
e
.

20
1
4

d
i
s
c
o
u
n
t

r
a
t
e

i
n

O
M
B

C
i
r
c
u
l
a
r

A
-
9
4

=

3
.
1
%

(
O
M
B
,

2
0
1
4
)
PV
=
+

5
7
,
9
3
2
.
3
4
$

x
Pr
e
s
e
n
t

V
a
l
u
e

o
f

A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

B
PV

=
4,
3
5
0
,
7
4
7
.
5
2
$

Ot
h
e
r

S
y
s
t
e
m

M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e

-

A
s
s
u
m
e

1
%

o
f

C
a
p
i
t
a
l

C
o
s
t

o
f

E
q
u
i
m
e
n
t
a
n
d

P
i
p
e
To
t
a
l

O
&
M

C
o
s
t

o
f

A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

B
3,
4
9
6
,
8
2
4
.
8
6
$

[1

+

.
0
3
1
)
20
-

1
]
[0
.
0
3
1
(
1

+

0
.
0
3
1
)
20
]
op
e
r
a
t
o
r

1
0
9
5

h
o
u
r
s
/
y
e
a
r
An
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l

C
o
s
t
s
Mo
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

L
a
b
o
r
Pe
r
m
i
t

F
e
e
s
pu
m
p
i
n
g

c
o
s
t
s

f
r
o
m

s
u
m
p

G
P
D
po
w
e
r

c
o
s
t

p
e
r

K
W
-
H
r
pu
m
p
i
n
g

c
o
s
t
s

f
r
o
m

s
u
m
p

p
e
r

1
0
0
0

g
a
l
l
o
n
s
O&
M

C
o
s
t
s
PV

C o

C
(1

r )n

1
r (1

r )n


It
e
m

D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Un
i
t

Q
u
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t

P
r
i
c
e

T
o
t
a
l

P
r
i
c
e
pi
p
e

-

6
"
L.
F
.

5
0
0
.
0
0

8
1
.
6
0
$

4
0
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$

fi
t
t
i
n
g
s

-

6
"
E.
A
.

2
.
0
0

3
7
.
0
3
$

7
4
.
0
6
$

Di
t
c
h
e
s
E.
A
.

1
5
0
0
.
0
0

2
.
1
8
$

3
,
2
7
0
.
0
0
$

El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
/
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
s

(
g
r
a
v
i
t
y

f
l
o
w

t
o

r
e
c
e
i
v
i
n
g

s
t
r
e
a
m
)
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

2
7
,
5
5
0
.
0
0
$

2
7
,
5
5
0
.
0
0
$

Pu
m
p
s
/
S
t
a
t
i
o
n

P
i
p
i
n
g
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

2
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$

2
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$

NP
D
E
S

P
e
r
m
i
t

F
e
e
s
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

8
6
0
.
0
0
$

8
6
0
.
0
0
$

Am
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t

t
o

L
e
a
c
h
a
t
e

M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t

P
l
a
n
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

Er
o
s
i
o
n

C
o
n
t
r
o
l
F.
T
.

1
5
0
0
.
0
0

2
.
2
4
$

3
,
3
6
0
.
0
0
$

Te
s
t
i
n
g
F.
T
.

1
5
0
0
.
0
0

2
.
0
0
$

3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r

M
o
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

9
.
0
0
%

9
,
3
9
7
.
2
7
$

En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
/
S
u
r
v
e
y

&

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
t
i
o
n

A
d
m
i
n
.
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

1
0
.
0
0
%

1
1
,
3
8
1
.
1
3
$

Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n

C
o
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
c
y
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

1
0
.
0
0
%

1
2
,
5
1
9
.
2
5
$

13
7
,
7
1
1
.
7
0
$

1,
3
3
7
,
7
1
1
.
7
0
$

25
gp
m
1
ft

p
e
r

1
0
0

f
t

1
0
0

f
t
60
ps
i

2
5

f
t
10
ft

1
0

f
t
to
t
a
l

f
t

T
D
H
70 90 7.
5

H
P
20

K
W
To

B
i
g

M
a
r
s
h

S
w
a
m
p

(
2
5
,
0
0
0

G
P
D

-

6
,
5
0
0

f
e
e
t
,

F
i
g
u
r
e

3
)
HP

r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
KW

r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
Fr
i
c
t
i
o
n

L
o
s
s
De
l
i
v
e
r
y

P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e

R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

H
e
a
d
Pu
m
p

E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y

a
s
s
u
m
e
d

t
o

b
e
Mo
t
o
r

E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y

a
s
s
u
m
e
d

t
o

b
e
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

D
:

D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e

2
5
,
0
0
0

G
P
D

t
o

B
i
g

M
a
r
s
h

S
w
a
m
p
Pi
p
i
n
g

a
n
d

S
y
s
t
e
m

C
o
s
t
s
To
t
a
l

C
a
p
i
t
a
l

C
o
s
t

o
f

A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

D
To
t
a
l

C
a
p
i
t
a
l

C
o
s
t

o
f

A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

D

+

R
O

S
y
s
t
e
m
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g

P
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
s

A
f
f
e
c
t
i
n
g

C
o
s
t
Pl
a
n
t

S
u
m
p

t
o

O
u
t
f
a
l
l

=
O&
M

C
o
s
t
s
0.
0
9
$

(
a
s
s
u
m
e
d
)
0.
3
5
$

25
,
0
0
0

3
,
1
9
3
.
7
5
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
45
.
0
0
$

pe
r

h
o
u
r

3
2
,
8
5
0
.
0
0
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
2,
1
6
0
.
0
0
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
1,
0
8
0
.
0
0
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
86
0
.
0
0
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
40
1
.
4
4
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
40
,
5
4
5
.
1
9
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
Pr
e
s
e
n
t

V
a
l
u
e

C
o
s
t
s

A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
:
Wh
e
r
e
:
PV

=

P
r
e
s
e
n
t

v
a
l
u
e

o
f

c
o
s
t
s
.
C o
=

C
o
s
t
s

i
n
c
u
r
r
e
d

i
n

t
h
e

p
r
e
s
e
n
t

y
e
a
r
.
C

=

C
o
s
t
s

i
n
c
u
r
r
e
d

y
e
a
r
l
y
n

=

E
n
d
i
n
g

y
e
a
r

o
f

t
h
e

l
i
f
e

o
f

t
h
e

f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
.
n
=

2
0

y
e
a
r

p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g

p
e
r
i
o
d
r

=

C
u
r
r
e
n
t

E
P
A

d
i
s
c
o
u
n
t

r
a
t
e
.

20
1
4

d
i
s
c
o
u
n
t

r
a
t
e

i
n

O
M
B

C
i
r
c
u
l
a
r

A
-
9
4

=

3
.
1
%

(
O
M
B
,

2
0
1
4
)
PV
=
+

4
0
,
5
4
5
.
1
9
$

x
Pr
e
s
e
n
t

V
a
l
u
e

o
f

A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

B
PV

=
1,
9
3
5
,
3
4
7
.
7
7
$

[0
.
0
3
1
(
1

+

0
.
0
3
1
)
20
]
Mo
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

L
a
b
o
r
Pe
r
m
i
t

F
e
e
s
Ot
h
e
r

S
y
s
t
e
m

M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e

-

A
s
s
u
m
e

1
%

o
f

C
a
p
i
t
a
l

C
o
s
t

o
f

E
q
u
i
m
e
n
t
a
n
d

P
i
p
e
To
t
a
l

O
&
M

C
o
s
t

o
f

A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

B
1,
3
3
7
,
7
1
1
.
7
0
$

[1

+

.
0
3
1
)
20
-

1
]
pu
m
p
i
n
g

c
o
s
t
s

f
r
o
m

s
u
m
p

G
P
D
op
e
r
a
t
o
r

7
3
0

h
o
u
r
s
/
y
e
a
r
An
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l

C
o
s
t
s

a
t

O
u
t
f
a
l
l

#
1
po
w
e
r

c
o
s
t

p
e
r

K
W
-
H
r
pu
m
p
i
n
g

c
o
s
t
s

f
r
o
m

s
u
m
p

p
e
r

1
0
0
0

g
a
l
l
o
n
s
PV

C o

C
(1

r )n

1
r (1

r )n


Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d

A
c
r
e
s

N
e
e
d
e
d

1

a
c
r
e
Co
s
t

o
f

L
a
n
d

i
s

$
4
0

y d 3 of

A
i
r
s
p ac
e

=

$
4
0

x

4
8
4
0

=

$
1
9
3
,
6
0
0
pe
r

a
c
r
e
Co
s
t

o
f

a
c
e
r
a
g
e

r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d

=

$
1
9
3
,
6
0
0

x

2
=

$
3
8
7
,
2
0
0
It
e
m

D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Un
i
t

Q
u
a
n
t
i
t
y
Un
i
t

P
r
i
c
e

T
o
t
a
l

P
r
i
c
e
pi
p
e

-

1
2
"
L.
F
.

2
0
0
0
.
0
0

2
7
7
.
8
0
$

5
5
5
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$

pi
p
e

-

8
"
L.
F
.

5
0
0
.
0
0

1
2
4
.
0
0
$

6
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

pi
p
e

-

6
"
L.
F
.

1
0
0
.
0
0

8
1
.
6
0
$

8
,
1
6
0
.
0
0
$

pi
p
e

-

4
"
L.
F
.

1
0
0
0
.
0
0

4
6
.
0
0
$

4
6
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

va
l
v
e
s

-

4
"
L.
F
.

4
.
0
0

6
0
0
.
0
0
$

2
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$

fi
t
t
i
n
g
s

-

1
2
"
E.
A
.

2
.
0
0

1
8
2
.
2
6
$

3
6
4
.
5
2
$

fi
t
t
i
n
g
s

-

8
"
E.
A
.

2
.
0
0

6
2
.
0
8
$

1
2
4
.
1
6
$

fi
t
t
i
n
g
s

-

6
"
E.
A
.

2
.
0
0

3
7
.
0
3
$

7
4
.
0
6
$

fi
t
t
i
n
g
s

-

4
"
E.
A
.

6
.
0
0

1
1
.
7
3
$

7
0
.
3
8
$

Ce
n
t
e
r

P
i
v
o
t

I
r
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

S
y
s
t
e
m
,

1

a
c
r
e
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

1
7
,
2
7
0
.
0
0
$

1
7
,
2
7
0
.
0
0
$

Ai
r

R
e
l
e
a
s
e

V
a
l
v
e
s
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

5
,
2
2
0
.
0
0
$

5
,
2
2
0
.
0
0
$

Pu
m
p

H
o
u
s
e
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

3
9
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$

3
9
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$

El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
/
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
s
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

5
5
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$

5
5
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$

Pu
m
p
s
/
S
t
a
t
i
o
n

P
i
p
i
n
g
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

4
9
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$

4
9
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$

Wa
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r

R
e
u
s
e
pi
p
e

-

6
"
L.
F
.

1
0
0
.
0
0

8
1
.
6
0
$

8
,
1
6
0
.
0
0
$

fi
t
t
i
n
g
s

-

6
"
E.
A
.

2
.
0
0

3
7
.
0
3
$

7
4
.
0
6
$

Pu
m
p

H
o
u
s
e
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

3
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

3
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
/
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
s
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

5
5
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$

5
5
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$

Pu
m
p
s
/
S
t
a
t
i
o
n

P
i
p
i
n
g
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

3
9
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$

3
9
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$

Ev
a
p
o
r
a
t
i
v
e

S
y
s
t
e
m

(
5
0
%

W
a
t
e
r
)
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

8
0
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

8
0
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

No
n
-
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e

P
e
r
m
i
t

F
e
e
s
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

8
1
0
.
0
0
$

8
1
0
.
0
0
$

Am
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t

t
o

L
e
a
c
h
a
t
e

M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t

P
l
a
n
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

Er
o
s
i
o
n

C
o
n
t
r
o
l
F.
T
.

5
0
0
0
.
0
0

2
.
2
4
$

1
1
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$

Te
s
t
i
n
g
F.
T
.

5
0
0
0
.
0
0

2
.
0
0
$

1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r

M
o
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

9
.
0
0
%

1
6
2
,
3
6
2
.
4
5
$

En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
/
S
u
r
v
e
y

&

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
t
i
o
n

A
d
m
i
n
.
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

1
0
.
0
0
%

1
9
6
,
6
3
8
.
9
6
$

Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n

C
o
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
c
y
E.
A
.

1
.
0
0

1
0
.
0
0
%

2
1
6
,
3
0
2
.
8
6
$

2,
7
6
6
,
5
3
1
.
4
5
$

3,
9
6
6
,
5
3
1
.
4
5
$

La
n
d

A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
Co
s
t

o
f

L
a
n
d
Pi
p
i
n
g

a
n
d

S
p
r
a
y
f
i
e
l
d

C
o
s
t
s
To
t
a
l

C
a
p
i
t
a
l

C
o
s
t

o
f

A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

E
To
t
a
l

C
a
p
i
t
a
l

C
o
s
t

o
f

A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

E

+

R
O

S
y
s
t
e
m
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

E
:

D
i
s
p
o
s
a
l

b
y

L
a
n
d

A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

w
i
t
h

P
a
r
t
i
a
l

W
a
t
e
r

Re
u
s
e

(
E
v
a
p
o
r
a
t
i
v
e

S
y
s
t
e
m
)
25
gp
m
1
ft

p
e
r

1
0
0

f
t

2
0
0

f
t
60
ps
i

5
0

f
t
10
ft

1
0

f
t
to
t
a
l

f
t

T
D
H
70 90 7.
5

H
P
20

K
W
O&
M

C
o
s
t
s
0.
0
9
$

(
a
s
s
u
m
e
d
)
0.
3
5
$

0.
4
7
$

25
,
0
0
0

3
,
1
9
3
.
7
5
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
25
,
0
0
0

4
,
2
8
8
.
7
5
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
45
.
0
0
$

pe
r

h
o
u
r

6
5
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
3,000.00
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
1,080.00
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
810.00
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
780.73
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
78,853.23
$

p
e
r

y
e
a
r
Ot
h
e
r

S
y
s
t
e
m

M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e

-

A
s
s
u
m
e

1
%

o
f

C
a
p
i
t
a
l

C
o
s
t

o
f

E
q
u
i
m
e
n
t
a
n
d

P
i
p
e
To
t
a
l

O
&
M

C
o
s
t

o
f

A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

B
op
e
r
a
t
o
r

1
4
6
0

h
o
u
r
s
/
y
e
a
r
An
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l

C
o
s
t
s
Mo
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

L
a
b
o
r
Pe
r
m
i
t

F
e
e
s
pu
m
p
i
n
g

c
o
s
t
s

t
o

l
a
n
d

a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

p
e
r

1
0
0
0

g
a
l
l
o
n
s
pu
m
p
i
n
g

c
o
s
t
s

f
r
o
m

s
u
m
p

G
P
D
pu
m
p
i
n
g

c
o
s
t
s

f
o
r

l
a
n
d

a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

G
P
D
Mo
t
o
r

E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y

a
s
s
u
m
e
d

t
o

b
e
HP

r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
KW

r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
po
w
e
r

c
o
s
t

p
e
r

K
W
-
H
r
pu
m
p
i
n
g

c
o
s
t
s

f
r
o
m

s
u
m
p

p
e
r

1
0
0
0

g
a
l
l
o
n
s
Pu
m
p

S
t
a
t
i
o
n

2
5
,
0
0
0

G
P
D

=
Fr
i
c
t
i
o
n

L
o
s
s
De
l
i
v
e
r
y

P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e

R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

H
e
a
d
Pu
m
p

E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y

a
s
s
u
m
e
d

t
o

b
e
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g

P
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
s

A
f
f
e
c
t
i
n
g

C
o
s
t
Pr
e
s
e
n
t

V
a
l
u
e

C
o
s
t
s

A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
:
Wh
e
r
e
:
PV

=

P
r
e
s
e
n
t

v
a
l
u
e

o
f

c
o
s
t
s
.
C o
=

C
o
s
t
s

i
n
c
u
r
r
e
d

i
n

t
h
e

p
r
e
s
e
n
t

y
e
a
r
.
C

=

C
o
s
t
s

i
n
c
u
r
r
e
d

y
e
a
r
l
y
n

=

E
n
d
i
n
g

y
e
a
r

o
f

t
h
e

l
i
f
e

o
f

t
h
e

f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
.
n
=

2
0

y
e
a
r

p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g

p
e
r
i
o
d
r

=

C
u
r
r
e
n
t

E
P
A

d
i
s
c
o
u
n
t

r
a
t
e
.

20
1
4

d
i
s
c
o
u
n
t

r
a
t
e

i
n

O
M
B

C
i
r
c
u
l
a
r

A
-
9
4

=

3
.
1
%

(
O
M
B
,

2
0
1
4
)
PV
=
+

7
8
,
8
5
3
.
2
3
$

x
Pr
e
s
e
n
t

V
a
l
u
e

o
f

A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e

B
PV

=
5,
1
2
8
,
8
2
7
.
9
8
$

3,
9
6
6
,
5
3
1
.
4
5
$

[1

+

.
0
3
1
)
20
-

1
]
[0
.
0
3
1
(
1

+

0
.
0
3
1
)
20
]
PV

C o

C
(1

r )n

1
r (1

r )n


TA
B
L
E

O
F

C
A
P
I
T
A
L

C
O
S
T
S
It
e
m
Si
z
e

U
n
i
t

M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
Co
s
t

p
e
r

F
o
o
t

o
r

It
e
m

I
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
Da
t
a

S
o
u
r
c
e

S
o
u
r
c
e

D
a
t
e
Ad
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t

Fa
c
t
o
r

t
o

2
0
1
6
Adjusted Cost per Foot or Item Installed
pi
p
e
4

i
n
c
h
e
s

P
V
C
46
.
0
0
$ 

Ch
a
r
l
o
t
t
e

P
i
p
e
20
1
6

N
/
A
46.00 $                      
pi
p
e
6

i
n
c
h
e
s

P
V
C
81
.
6
0
$ 

Ch
a
r
l
o
t
t
e

P
i
p
e
20
1
6
81.60 $                      
pi
p
e
8

i
n
c
h
e
s

P
V
C
12
4
.
0
0
$ 

Ch
a
r
l
o
t
t
e

P
i
p
e
20
1
6
124.00 $                    
pi
p
e
12

i
n
c
h
e
s

P
V
C
27
7
.
8
0
$ 

Ch
a
r
l
o
t
t
e

P
i
p
e
20
1
6
277.80 $                    
fi
t
t
i
n
g
4

i
n
c
h
e
s

D
I
11
.
7
3
$ 

Ch
a
r
l
o
t
t
e

P
i
p
e
20
1
6
11.73 $                      
fi
t
t
i
n
g
6

i
n
c
h
e
s

D
I
37
.
0
3
$ 

Ch
a
r
l
o
t
t
e

P
i
p
e
20
1
6
37.03 $                      
fi
t
t
i
n
g
8

i
n
c
h
e
s

D
I
62
.
0
8
$ 

Ch
a
r
l
o
t
t
e

P
i
p
e
20
1
6
62.08 $                      
fi
t
t
i
n
g
12

i
n
c
h
e
s

D
I
18
2
.
2
6
$ 

Ch
a
r
l
o
t
t
e

P
i
p
e
20
1
6
182.26 $                    
ai
r

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$ 

Fo
l
k
s
t
o
n
e
/
D
i
x
o
n

2
0
1
1

1
.
1
6
5,220.00 $                
va
l
v
e
4

i
n
c
h
e
s

D
I
60
0
.
0
0
$ 

ca
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d

f
r
o
m

C
E
C

2
0
0
7

1
.
5
4
924.00 $                    
mo
t
o
r

a
c
t
u
a
t
e
d

v
a
l
v
e
4

i
n
c
h
e
s

D
I
78
6
.
4
8
$ 

S
p
e
a
r
s

M
a
n
u
f
a
c
t
u
r
i
n
g

2
0
1
2

1
.
1
2
880.86 $                    
bl
o
w
‐
o
f
f
6

i
n
c
h
e
s
3,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$ 

Fo
l
k
s
t
o
n
e
/
D
i
x
o
n

2
0
1
1

1
.
1
6
3,712.00 $                
bl
o
w
‐
o
f
f
4

i
n
c
h
e
s
2,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$ 

Fo
l
k
s
t
o
n
e
/
D
i
x
o
n

2
0
1
1

1
.
1
6
3,248.00 $                
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l

B
o
r
e
14

i
n
c
h
e
s

H
D
P
E

2
6
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 

Fo
l
k
s
t
o
n
e
/
D
i
x
o
n

2
0
1
1

1
.
1
6
30,160.00 $              
mo
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
6%
CE
C

W
e
l
l
f
i
e
l
d
20
0
7

1
.
5
4
9%
er
o
s
i
o
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
pe
r

f
o
o
t
1.
9
3
$ 

F
o
l
k
s
t
o
n
e
/
D
i
x
o
n

2
0
1
1

1
.
1
6
2.24 $                        
te
s
t
i
n
g
pe
r

f
o
o
t
1.
7
2
$ 

F
o
l
k
s
t
o
n
e
/
D
i
x
o
n

2
0
1
1

1
.
1
6
2.00 $                        
SC
A
D
A
1

e
a
14
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 

CE
C

W
e
l
l
f
i
e
l
d
20
1
1

1
.
1
6
16,240.00 $              
el
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l

a
n
d

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
s

‐

2
5

H
P
1

e
a
47
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$ 

EP
A

4
0
9
8
0
0
0
3
20
1
1

1
.
1
6
55,100.00 $              
pu
m
p
s
25

g
p
m
6,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$ 

Ve
n
d
o
r

Q
u
o
t
e
s
20
1
5
6,500.00 $                
Ce
n
e
r

P
i
v
o
t

I
r
r
i
g
a
t
o
r
1 
a
c
r
e

e
a
7,
8
5
0
.
0
0
$ 

N
C

C
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
v
e

E
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n

1
9
9
6

2
.
2
17,270.00 $              
Dr
a
i
n
a
g
e

D
i
t
c
h
e
s
,

3

f
t

d
e
e
p
1

f
t
1.
4
7
$ 

RS

M
e
a
n
s
20
0
8

1
.
4
8
2.18 $                        
Po
l
y
m
e
r

F
e
e
d

S
y
s
t
e
m
20
0

l
b
/
d
a
y

e
a
31
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 

EP
A
19
7
8

3
.
7
7
116,870.00 $            
RO

S
y
s
t
e
m
25
,
0
0
0

G
P
D
1,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 

Ve
n
d
o
r

Q
u
o
t
e
s
20
1
5
1,200,000.00 $        
Ev
a
p
o
r
a
t
i
v
e

S
y
s
t
e
m
25
,
0
0
0

G
P
D
1,
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 

Ve
n
d
o
r

Q
u
o
t
e
s
20
1
5
1,600,000.00 $        
**

E
s
t
i
m
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

c
o
s
t

f
o
r

i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l

o
p
t
i
o
n

u
s
i
n
g

d
a
t
a

f
r
o
m

d
a
t
a

f
r
o
m

r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

p
r
o
j
e
c
t

a
d
j
u
s
t
e
d

b
y

t
h
e

"
s
i
x

t
e
n
t
h
s

r
u
l
e
.
"
TA
B
L
E

O
F

O
&
M

C
O
S
T
S
It
e
m

S
i
z
e

U
n
i
t
O&
M

C
o
s
t
/

Y
r
Da
t
a

S
o
u
r
c
e

S
o
u
r
c
e

D
a
t
e
O&
M

L
a
b
o
r

R
a
t
e

$
4
5
/
h
r

A
s
s
u
m
e
d

2
0
1
6
Po
w
e
r

R
a
t
e

K
W

H
r

0
.
0
9
$ 

L
R
E
M
C

P
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
d

R
a
t
e
s

2
0
1
6
An
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l

C
o
s
t
s

‐

N
P
D
E
S
mo
n
t
l
y

e
v
e
n
t

‐

an
n
u
a
l
i
z
e
d
$1
8
0
/
e
v
e
n
t

2
,
1
6
0
.
0
0
$ 

ES
C

L
a
b

S
c
i
e
n
c
e
s

F
e
e

S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e

No
v
e
m
b
e
r

1
,

2
0
1
5
2015
An
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l

C
o
s
t
s

‐

N
o
n
‐
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
mo
n
t
h
l
y

e
v
e
n
t

‐

an
n
u
a
l
i
z
e
d
$2
5
0
/
e
v
e
n
t

3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 

ES
C

L
a
b

S
c
i
e
n
c
e
s

F
e
e

S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e

No
v
e
m
b
e
r

1
,

2
0
1
5
2015
Mo
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

L
a
b
o
r

‐

N
P
D
E
S
mo
n
t
h
l
y

e
v
e
n
t

‐

an
n
u
a
l
i
z
e
d
2 
h
r
s

/

e
v
e
n
t
,

$4
5
/
h
r
1,
0
8
0
.
0
0
$ 

A
s
s
u
m
e
d

2
0
1
6
Mo
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

L
a
b
o
r

‐

N
o
n
‐
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
mo
n
t
h
l
y

e
v
e
n
t

‐

an
n
u
a
l
i
z
e
d
2 
h
r
s

/

e
v
e
n
t
,

$4
5
/
h
r
1,
0
8
0
.
0
0
$ 

A
s
s
u
m
e
d

2
0
1
6
Pe
r
m
i
t

F
e
e
s

‐

N
P
D
E
S

y
e
a
r
l
y

8
6
0
.
0
0
$ 

N
C
D
E
Q

W
e
b
s
i
t
e

2
0
1
6
Pe
r
m
i
t

F
e
e
s

‐

N
o
n
‐
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e

y
e
a
r
l
y

8
1
0
.
0
0
$ 

N
C
D
E
Q

W
e
b
s
i
t
e

2
0
1
6

APPENDIX IV: SUPPORTING INGORMATION AND MANUFACTURER’S
LITERATURE

Contents

Pages 4-1 to 4-3 Permit Fees
Pages 4-4 to 4-24 Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Pipe and Fittings Prices
Pages 4-25 to 4-32 “Irrigation System Characteristics and Costs”; NC Cooperative
Extension, 1996
1&'(413'(6)HHV
KWWSSRUWDOQFGHQURUJZHEZTVZSSVQSGHVIHHVFKHGXOH 
1&'HSDUWPHQWRI(QYLURQPHQWDQG1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHV
:DWHU4XDOLW\13'(6)HHV
:DWHU4XDOLW\3HUPLWWLQJ
:DVWHZDWHU%UDQFK
13'(6:DVWHZDWHU
38%/,&127,&(6
$SSOLFDWLRQV
$XWKWR&RQVWXFW
&RDO$VK'RFV
&RPSOLDQFH
&RQWDFW6WDII
)$4V
)HHV
)RUPV 'RFV
*HQHUDO3HUPLWV
*XLGDQFH
+LVWRU\
/LQNV
0DMRU)DFLOLW\0DS
0LQRU)DFLOLW\0DS
0HHWLQJ5HTXHVW
0HWDOV&DOFXODWRUV
3HUPLW3URFHVV
5HJXODWLRQV
7D[&HUWLILFDWLRQ
3UHWUHDWPHQW
&ROOHFWLRQ6\VWHPV
1RQ'LVFKDUJH3HUPLWWLQJ
8QLW
:HWODQGV
)HHV6FKHGXOH
(IIHFWLYH6HSWHPEHU
0LVFHOODQHRXV_'HILQLWLRQV
&$7(*25<$
$&7,9,7<
6HH1RWHV
1(:3(50,7$33/,&$7,21
)(($118$/)((
0$-2502',),&$7,21)((
6HH1RWH
0DMRU,QGLYLGXDO13'(63HUPLWV 
0LQRU,QGLYLGXDO13'(63HUPLWV 
6LQJOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQFHV 
6WRUPZDWHU :DVWHZDWHU
'LVFKDUJH*HQHUDO3HUPLWV
1$
5HF\FOH6\VWHPV 
$QLPDO3HUPLWV6PDOO2SV1$
$QLPDO3HUPLWV0HGLXP2SV1$
$QLPDO3HUPLWV/DUJH2SV1$
1RQGLVFKDUJH0DMRU3HUPLWV 
1RQGLVFKDUJH0LQRU3HUPLWV 
&$7(*25<%
$&7,9,7<
6HH1RWH
$'',7,21$/$118$/)((
6HH1RWH
352-(&7)((
6HH1RWH
6SHFLDO2UGHUE\&RQVHQW0DMRU 
6SHFLDO2UGHUE\&RQVHQW0LQRU 
&$7(*25<&
$&7,9,7<
6HH1RWH
$'',7,21$/$118$/)((
6HH1RWH
6HZHU([WHQVLRQV 
6WDWH6WRUPZDWHU 
:DWHU4XDOLW\&HUWLILFDWLRQV0DMRU 
:DWHU4XDOLW\&HUWLILFDWLRQV0LQRU 
3HWUROHXP&RQWDPLQDWHG6RLOV 
0,6&(//$1(286¬
$&7,9,7<352-(&7)((
1&'(413'(6)HHV
KWWSSRUWDOQFGHQURUJZHEZTVZSSVQSGHVIHHVFKHGXOH 
3HUPLW5HQHZDO 1R)HH
$XWKRUL]DWLRQWR&RQVWUXFW 1R)HH
0LQRU3HUPLW0RGLILFDWLRQ 1R)HH
%DFNWR7RS
127(6
¬5HIHUWRGHILQLWLRQVSDJHIRUVSHFLILFGHVFULSWLRQVRIHDFKDFWLYLW\FDWHJRU\
¬)RUQHZSHUPLWUHTXHVWVXQGHUDFWLYLWLHVOLVWHGLQ&DWHJRU\$DIHHHTXLYDOHQWWRWKHFRUUHVSRQGLQJDQQXDOIHH
LVUHTXLUHG¬7KLVIHHLVQRQUHIXQGDEOHLIWKHSHUPLWUHTXHVWLVGHQLHG¬,IWKHSHUPLWLVJUDQWHGWKLVIHHDSSOLHVDV
WKHDQQXDOIHHIRUWKHILUVW\HDUDIWHUSHUPLWLVVXDQFH
¬7KLVIHHLVQRQUHIXQGDEOHLIWKHSHUPLWUHTXHVWLVGHQLHG¬$PDMRUPRGLILFDWLRQVKDOOEHGHILQHGDVRQHWKDW
LQFUHDVHVWKHYROXPHLQFUHDVHVWKHSROOXWDQWORDGUHVXOWVLQDVLJQLILFDQWUHORFDWLRQRIWKHGLVFKDUJHSRLQWRU
UHVXOWVLQDFKDQJHLQWKHFKDUDFWHULVWLFVRIWKHZDVWHJHQHUDWHG
¬7KHVHIHHVVKDOOEHLQDGGLWLRQWRWKHDVVRFLDWHGDQQXDOIHHDVOLVWHGXQGHU&DWHJRU\$
¬
'HILQLWLRQVRI3HUPLWWHG$FWLYLWLHV
,QGLYLGXDO13'(6
0DMRU
! PLOOLRQJDOORQVSHUGD\,QGXVWULHVZLWKKLJKWR[LFSRWHQWLDOPXQLFLSDOLWLHV
ZLWKSUHWUHDWPHQWSURJUDPVPXQLFLSDOVWRUPZDWHUSHUPLWV
,QGLYLGXDO13'(6
0LQRU
PLOOLRQJDOORQVSHUGD\,QGXVWULHVZLWKORZWR[LFSRWHQWLDOPXQLFLSDOLWLHV
VPDOOGRPHVWLFZDVWHIDFLOLWLHVLQGXVWULDOVWRUPZDWHUSHUPLWV
6LQJOH)DPLO\
5HVLGHQFHV
$OOLQGLYLGXDOV\VWHPVFRYHUHGXQGHU13'(6*HQHUDO3HUPLW1XPEHU1&*
DQGQRQGLVFKDUJHVLQJOHIDPLO\UHVLGHQWLDOV\VWHPV
6WRUPZDWHU
:DVWHZDWHU'LVFKDUJH
*HQHUDO3HUPLWV
)DFLOLWLHVFRYHUHGXQGHUVWDWHZLGH*HQHUDO13'(63HUPLWV&RPPRQH[DPSOHV
LQFOXGHPLQHGHZDWHULQJFRROLQJZDWHUYHKLFOHPDLQWHQDQFHDFWLYLWLHVHWF
5HF\FOH6\VWHPV 0XVWEHFRPSOHWHFORVHGORRSUHF\FOHV\VWHP
$QLPDO3HUPLWV
6PDOO
WR6WHDG\6WDWH/LYH:HLJKW
$QLPDO3HUPLWV
0HGLXP
WR6WHDG\6WDWH/LYH:HLJKW
$QLPDO3HUPLWV
/DUJH
!6WHDG\6WDWH/LYH:HLJKW
1RQGLVFKDUJH3HUPLWV
0DMRU
!JDOORQVSHUGD\RU!DFUHVRIODQGUHTXLUHG
1RQGLVFKDUJH3HUPLWV
0LQRU
WR6WHDG\6WDWH/LYH:HLJKW
6SHFLDO2UGHUE\
&RQVHQW0DMRU
5HIHUWRFDWHJRULHVGHVFULEHGDERYHIRU0DMRUIDFLOLWLHV
6SHFLDO2UGHUE\
&RQVHQW0LQRU
5HIHUWRFDWHJRULHVGHVFULEHGDERYHIRU0LQRUIDFLOLWLHV
6HZHU([WHQVLRQV &ROOHFWLRQV\VWHPFRQVWUXFWLRQRUH[WHQVLRQWRDQH[LVWLQJV\VWHP
6WDWH6WRUPZDWHU $OOQHZGHYHORSPHQWLQWKHFRDVWDOFRXQWLHV1HZGHYHORSPHQWORFDWHG
WKURXJKRXWWKHVWDWHQHDUGHVLJQDWHGVHQVLWLYHZDWHUVLH+LJK4XDOLW\:DWHUV
2XWVWDQGLQJ5HVRXUFH:DWHUV
:DWHU4XDOLW\
&HUWLILFDWLRQV0DMRU
!DFUHZHWODQGILOO!IHHWVWUHDPLPSDFWV
:DWHU4XDOLW\
&HUWLILFDWLRQV0LQRU
DFUHZHWODQGILOOIHHWVWUHDPLPSDFWV
1&'(4)HHV
KWWSSRUWDOQFGHQURUJZHEZTDSVODXIHHV 
1&'HSDUWPHQWRI(QYLURQPHQWDQG1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHV
:DWHU4XDOLW\)HHV
:DWHU4XDOLW\3HUPLWWLQJ
:DVWHZDWHU%UDQFK
13'(6:DVWHZDWHU
3UHWUHDWPHQW
&ROOHFWLRQ6\VWHPV
1RQ'LVFKDUJH3HUPLWWLQJ
8QLW
$SSOLFDWLRQ)RUPV
)DFLOLW\0DS
)HHV
3HUPLWWLQJ
3URJUDPV
3ROLFLHV
0HPRUDQGXPV
5HSRUWLQJ)RUPV
5XOHVDQG6WDWXWHV
6WDII'LUHFWRU\
6XEPLWWDO0HHWLQJ
:HWODQGV
1RQ'LVFKDUJH3HUPLWWLQJ8QLW)HHV
*HQHUDO1RWHV
$SSOLFDWLRQIHHVDUHQRQUHIXQGDEOH
&KHFNV0RQH\2UGHUV(OHFWURQLF7UDQVIHUVVKDOOEHPDGHSD\DEOHWRWKH1RUWK&DUROLQD'HSDUWPHQWRI
(QYLURQPHQWDO4XDOLW\1&'(4
&KDQJHVRI2ZQHUVKLS0LQRU0RGLILFDWLRQV1DPH&KDQJHV5HQHZDOVZLWK0LQRU0RGLILFDWLRQVDQG5HQHZDOV
ZLWKRXWPRGLILFDWLRQGRQRWUHTXLUHDQDSSOLFDWLRQIHH
$QQXDODQG$SSOLFDWLRQIHHVDUHHVWDEOLVKHGLQ*6'
KWWSZZZQFOHJQHW(QDFWHG/HJLVODWLRQ6WDWXWHV+70/%\6HFWLRQ&KDSWHUB*6B'KWPO
$QQXDOIHHVIRUPXQLFLSDOLWLHVDQGLQGXVWULHVPD\EHSDLGXVLQJH3D\PHQW KWWSSRUWDOQFGHQURUJZHEZTKRW
WRSLFVHSD\PHQW
1RQ'LVFKDUJH$FWLYLW\$QQXDO)HH
&ORVHG/RRS5HF\FOH 
1RQ'LVFKDUJH0DMRU 
1RQ'LVFKDUJH0LQRU 
5HFODLPHG:DWHU'LVWULEXWLRQ/LQH 1$
6LQJOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQFH 
$QQXDO $SSOLFDWLRQ
1RUWK&DUROLQD'HSDUWPHQWRI(QYLURQPHQWDO4XDOLW\
:HVW-RQHV6WUHHW5DOHLJK1&
7ROO)UHH¬
SPECIFICATIONS
PlasticP i p e
For Drainage & Pressure Applications
(Updated November 2, 2015)
© 2002-2015 Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Company
LP-PPDP
2
Contents
Product Offering by Type & Diameter ..................................................................................................3
Price Sheets
ABS Foam Core DWV Pipe ............................................ASTM F 628 ...............................................4
ABS Plus® Foam Core DWV Pipe ...................................ASTM F 1488 .............................................5
PVC Foam Core DWV Pipe .............................................ASTM F 891 ...............................................6
RePVC® DWV Pipe ........................................................ASTM F 1760 .............................................7
PVC Schedule 40 DWV Pipe Plain End ...........................ASTM D 1785 & ASTM D 2665 ..................8
PVC Schedule 40 Pipe Plain End ...................................ASTM D 1785 & ASTM D 2665 ..................9
PVC Schedule 40 Pipe Bell End .....................................ASTM D 1785 & ASTM D 2665 ................10
PVC Well Casing Bell End ..............................................ASTM F 480 ..............................................11
PVC SDR 21 PR-200 Pipe Bell End ...............................ASTM D 2241 ...........................................11
PVC SDR 26 PR-160 Pipe Bell End ...............................ASTM D 2241 ...........................................11
FlowGuard Gold® CPVC CTS Pipe ..................................ASTM D 2846 ...........................................12
ReUze® CPVC CTS Pipe .................................................ASTM D 2846 ...........................................13
PVC Schedule 80 Plain End Pipe ....................................ASTM D 1785 ...........................................14
PVC Schedule 80 Bell End Pipe ......................................ASTM D 1785 ...........................................15
ChemDrain® CPVC Schedule 40 Pipe ..............................ASTM D 2618 ...........................................16
PVC SDR 35 Gasketed Sewer Pipe .................................ASTM D 3034 ...........................................17
PVC SDR 35 PS46 Solvent Weld Sewer Pipe ..................ASTM D 3034 ...........................................17
PVC Sewer and Drain Solvent Weld Pipe ........................ASTM D 2729 ...........................................18
Additional Information .....................................................................................................................19
Possession of this price list shall not be construed as an offer to sell the products listed.
ABS Plus, ReUze, RePVC, Charlotte Pipe, Charlotte, ChemDrain and “You can’t beat the system” are registered trademarks of Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Company.
FlowGuard Gold is a registered trademark of Lubrizol Corp.
Prices published in this guide are list prices.
Please contact Charlotte Pipe® or one of our distributors for net prices.
All products manufactured by Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Company are proudly made in the U.S.A.
M ADEINU.S.A.
3
M ADEINU.S.A.
Sizes Available
Product 1⁄4 3⁄8 1⁄2 3⁄4 1 11⁄4 11⁄2 2 21⁄2 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 14 15 16
ChemDrain® CPVC
Schedule 40 ★ • • • • • •
FlowGuard Gold®
CPVC CTS SDR 11 • • • • • •
ReUze® CPVC CTS SDR 11 • • • • •
PVC Schedule 80 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PVC Schedule 40 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PVC Schedule 40 DWV ★ • • • • • • • • • • • •
RePVC® Schedule 40 DWV
with Recycled Content ★ • • • • • •
PVC Schedule 30 ★ •
PVC DWV Foam Core ★ • • • • • • • •
PVC Well Casing • • • • • • • • • •
PVC SDR 13.5 (PR315) •
PVC SDR 21 (PR200) • • • • •
PVC SDR 26 (PR160) • • • •
PVC SDR 35 Sewer Main
Belled-End ★†
• •
PVC SDR 35 Sewer Main
Gasketed ★† • • •
PVC D 2729 Sewer and Drain ★† • •
ABS DWV Foam Core ★ • • • • •
ABS Plus® DWV Foam Core ★ • • • •
★ Non-Pressure
† Not NSF Listed
Pipe Reference Guide
ABS Plus, ReUze, RePVC, ChemDrain and “You can’t beat the system” and are registered trademarks of Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Company.
FlowGuard Gold is a registered trademark of Lubrizol Corp.
Notes:
1. End treatments are Plain and Belled. Consult factory for availability.
2. Lengths are 10 and 20 feet (14 and 20 feet for Gasketed Sewer Main. Consult factory for availability and non-standard lengths.
3. PVC Schedule 40 Bell End and PVC Well Casing pipe lengths for sizes 4”, 6”, and 8” are 20 feet plus the bell (20 foot laying length).
The length for all other sizes of Schedule 40 Bell End pipe and PVC Well Casing pipe are 20 feet, including the bell.
4. PVC SDR 35 Sewer Main Pipe in 14 foot lengths are 14 feet plus the bell (14 foot laying length).
4
ABS 3112 11⁄2” x 10’ 03132 2590 2.500 1.900 0.145 27.1 $113.20
ABS 3112 11⁄2” x 20’ 03133 5180 5.000 1.900 0.145 27.1 $113.20
ABS 3200 2” x 10’ 03134 1670 2.500 2.375 0.154 37.7 $151.90
ABS 3200 2” x 20’ 03135 3340 5.000 2.375 0.154 37.7 $151.90
ABS 3300 3” x 10’ 03136 750 2.500 3.500 0.216 74.5 $314.00
ABS 3300 3” x 20’ 03137 1500 5.000 3.500 0.216 74.5 $314.00
ABS 3400 4” x 10’ 03138 480 2.500 4.500 0.237 107.1 $449.00
ABS 3400 4” x 20’ 03139 960 5.000 4.500 0.237 107.1 $449.00
ABS 3600 6” x 20’ 03141 400 5.000 6.625 0.280 187.8 $914.70
NOTE: For truckloads of mixed sizes, multiply skids desired by
truckload percent per skid.
>> ABS Schedule 40 DWV Pipe (For Non-Pressure Applications)
Possession of this price list shall not be construed as an offer to sell the products listed.
ABS Foam Core DWV Pipe
ABS SCHEDULE 40 FOAM CORE (BLACK) PLAIN END ASTM F 628
TRUCKLOAD PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL (IN.) WT. PER LIST PRICE 611942- SKID PER SKID 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
NSF Listed. Meets All Requirements of ASTM F 628.
All products manufactured by Charlotte Pipe and
Foundry Company are proudly made in the U.S.A.
NOT FOR PRESSURE
Do not use PVC / ABS / ABS Plus® cellular core (foam core) pipe
for pressure applications. The use of cellular core pipe in
pressure applications may result in system failure and
property damage.
• NEVER test with or transport/store
compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS /
CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings.
• NEVER test PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast
Iron pipe or fittings with compressed
air or gas, or air over water boosters.
• ONLY use PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast Iron
pipe or fittings for water or approved
chemicals.
• Refer to warnings on PPFA’s website
and ASTM D 1785.
Testing with or use of compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS
/ CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings can result in explosive
failures and cause severe injury or death.
5
APA 17112 11⁄2” x 10’ 12495 2590 2.500 1.900 0.145 31.4 $113.20
APA 17112 11⁄2” x 20’ 12494 5180 5.000 1.900 0.145 31.4 $113.20
APA 17200 2” x 10’ 12497 1670 2.500 2.375 0.154 41.9 $151.90
APA 17200 2” x 20’ 12496 3340 5.000 2.375 0.154 41.9 $151.90
APA 17300 3” x 10’ 12499 750 2.500 3.500 0.216 84.0 $314.00
APA 17300 3” x 20’ 12498 1500 5.000 3.500 0.216 84.0 $314.00
APA 17400 4” x 10’ 12501 480 2.500 4.500 0.237 118.8 $449.00
APA 17400 4” x 20’ 12500 960 5.000 4.500 0.237 118.8 $449.00
NOTE: For truckloads of mixed sizes, multiply skids desired by
truckload percent per skid.
>> ABS Plus® Schedule 40 DWV Pipe (For Non-Pressure Applications)
Possession of this price list shall not be construed as an offer to sell the products listed.
ABS Plus is a registered trademark of Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Company.
ABS Plus® Foam Core DWV Pipe
ABS PLUS® SCHEDULE 40 FOAM CORE (BLACK) PLAIN END ASTM F 1488
TRUCKLOAD PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL (IN.) WT. PER LIST PRICE 611942- SKID PER SKID 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
NSF Listed. Meets All Requirements of ASTM F 1488.
All products manufactured by Charlotte Pipe and
Foundry Company are proudly made in the U.S.A.
NOT FOR PRESSURE
Do not use PVC / ABS / ABS Plus® cellular core (foam core) pipe
for pressure applications. The use of cellular core pipe in
pressure applications may result in system failure and
property damage.
Testing with or use of compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS
/ CPVC pipe or fittings can result in explosive failures and
cause severe injury or death.
• NEVER test with or transport/store
compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS / CPVC
pipe or fittings.
• NEVER test PVC / ABS / CPVC pipe or
fittings with compressed air or gas, or air
over water boosters.
• ONLY use PVC / ABS / CPVC pipe or
fittings for water or approved chemicals.
• Refer to warnings on PPFA’s website and
ASTM D 1785.
6
PVC 4112 11⁄2” x 10’ 04178 1650 1.785 1.785 0.145 32.3 $89.00
PVC 4112 11⁄2” x 20’ 04177 3300 3.570 1.900 0.145 32.3 $89.00
PVC 4200 2” x 10’ 04174 990 1.780 2.375 0.154 43.3 $120.00
PVC 4200 2” x 20’ 04173 1980 3.570 2.375 0.154 43.9 $120.00
PVC 4300 3” x 10’ 03934 1040 4.160 3.500 0.216 89.7 $245.00
PVC 4300 3” x 20’ 03935 920 3.570 3.500 0.216 89.7 $245.00
PVC 4400 4” x 10’ 03936 600 4.160 4.500 0.237 123.8 $336.00
PVC 4400 4” x 20’ 03937 1200 7.144 4.500 0.237 123.8 $336.00
PVC 4600 6” x 10’ 03938 280 4.160 6.625 0.280 235.0 $569.00
PVC 4600 6” x 20’ 03939 560 8.330 6.625 0.280 235.0 $569.00
PVC 4800 8” x 20’ 03941 360 8.330 8.625 0.322 371.0 $854.00
PVC 4910 10” x 20’ 03942 220 8.330 10.750 0.365 566.3 $1,425.00
PVC 4912 12” x 20’ 03943 120 8.928 12.750 0.406 700.0 $2,095.00
PVC 4300B 3” x 20’ 04782 920 3.570 3.500 0.216 89.7 $306.00
PVC 4400B 4” x 10’ 04783 540 4.160 4.500 0.237 123.8 $420.00
PVC 4400B 4” x 20’ 04784 1080 7.144 4.500 0.237 123.8 $420.00
PVC 4600B 6” x 10’ 09904 240 4.160 6.625 0.280 235.0 $711.00
PVC 4600B 6” x 20’ 04786 480 8.330 6.625 0.280 235.0 $711.00
NOTE: When ordering, please specify plain end or bell-end.
For truckloads of mixed sizes, multiply skids desired by
truckload percent per skid.
Possession of this price list shall not be construed as an offer to sell the products listed.
PVC Foam Core DWV Pipe
PVC SCHEDULE 40 FOAM CORE (WHITE) PLAIN END ASTM F 891
TRUCKLOAD PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL (IN.) WT. PER LIST PRICE 611942- SKID PER SKID 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
>> PVC Schedule 40 DWV Pipe (For Non-Pressure Applications)
PVC SCHEDULE 40 FOAM CORE (WHITE) BELL-END
TRUCKLOAD PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL (IN.) WT. PER LIST PRICE 611942- SKID PER SKID 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
NSF Listed. Meets All Requirements of ASTM F 891.
• NEVER test with or transport/store
compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS /
CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings.
• NEVER test PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast
Iron pipe or fittings with compressed
air or gas, or air over water boosters.• ONLY use PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast Iron
pipe or fittings for water or approved chemicals.
• Refer to warnings on PPFA’s website
and ASTM D 1785.
Testing with or use of compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS
/ CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings can result in explosive
failures and cause severe injury or death.
NOT FOR PRESSURE
Do not use RePVC DWV pipe for pressure applications. The
use of co-extruded DWV pipe in pressure applications may
result in system failure and property damage.
7
PVC 15112 11⁄2” x 20’ 11744 3300’ 3.570 1.900 0.145 50.7 $123.00
PVC 15200 2” x 20’ 11745 1980’ 3.570 2.375 0.154 68.1 $167.00
PVC 15300 3” x 20’ 11746 920’ 3.570 3.500 0.216 141.2 $328.00
PVC 15400 4” x 20’ 11748 1200’ 7.144 4.500 0.237 201.2 $458.00
PVC 15600 6” x 20’ 11749 560’ 8.330 6.625 0.280 353.7 $1,042.00
PVC 15800 8” x 20’ 11984 360’ 8.330 8.625 0.322 544.6 $1,330.00
PVC SCHEDULE 40 (WHITE) PLAIN END FOR NON-PRESSURE APPLICATIONS ASTM F 1760
TRUCKLOAD PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL (IN.) WT. PER LIST PRICE 611942- SKID PER SKID 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
>> PVC Schedule 40 DWV Pipe with Recycled Content
Possession of this price list shall not be construed as an offer to sell the products listed.
RePVC and “You can’t beat the system” are registered trademarks of Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Company.
RePVC® DWV Pipe
NOTE: For truckloads of mixed sizes, multiply skids desired by
truckload percent per skid.
NSF Listed. Meets All Requirements of ASTM D 4396
and ASTM F 1760.
All products manufactured by Charlotte Pipe and
Foundry Company are proudly made in the U.S.A.
Piping systems differ in chemical resistance. Pipe or fittings
may be damaged by contact with products containing
incompatible chemicals resulting in property damage.
• Verify that paints, thread sealants, lubricants, plasticized
PVC products, foam insulations, caulks, leak detectors,
insecticides, termiticides, antifreeze solutions, pipe
sleeve, firestop materials or other materials are
chemically compatible with ABS, PVC or CPVC.
• Do not use edible oils such as Crisco® for lubricant.
• Read and follow chemical manufacturer’s literature
before using with piping materials.
• Confirm compatibility of pipe marking adhesive tape
with the manufacturer of the tape to ensure chemical
compatibility with CPVC pipe and fittings.
• NEVER test with or transport/store
compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS /
CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings.
• NEVER test PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast
Iron pipe or fittings with compressed
air or gas, or air over water boosters.
• ONLY use PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast Iron
pipe or fittings for water or approved
chemicals.
• Refer to warnings on PPFA’s website
and ASTM D 1785.
Testing with or use of compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS
/ CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings can result in explosive
failures and cause severe injury or death.
8
PVC 7100* 11⁄4”x10’ 03945 2120’ 1.780 1.660 .140 42.4 $106.00
PVC 7100* 11⁄4”x20’ 03946 4240’ 4.166 1.660 .140 42.4 $106.00
PVC 7112* 11⁄2”x10’ 03947 1650’ 1.780 1.900 .145 51.8 $124.00
PVC 7112* 11⁄2”x20’ 03948 3300’ 3.570 1.900 .145 51.8 $124.00
PVC 7200* 2”x10’ 03949 990’ 1.780 2.375 .154 69.5 $162.00
PVC 7200* 2”x20’ 03950 1980’ 3.570 2.375 .154 69.5 $162.00
PVC 7300* 3”x10’ 03951 1040’ 4.160 3.500 .216 144.2 $326.00
PVC 7300* 3”x20’ 03952 920’ 3.570 3.500 .216 144.2 $326.00
PVC 7400 † 4”x10’ 03953 600’ 4.160 4.500 .237 205.5 $460.00
PVC 7400 † 4”x20’ 03954 1200’ 7.144 4.500 .237 205.5 $460.00
PVC 7500 † 5”x20’ 04837 760’ 7.144 5.563 .258 272.5 $630.00
PVC 7600 † 6”x10’ 03955 280’ 4.160 6.625 .280 361.2 $816.00
PVC 7600 † 6”x20’ 03956 560’ 8.330 6.625 .280 361.2 $816.00
PVC 7800 † 8”x10’ 13087 180’ 4.160 8.625 .322 543.6 $1240.00
PVC 7800 † 8”x20’ 03958 360’ 8.330 8.625 .322 543.6 $1240.00
PVC 7910 † 10”x20’ 03959 220’ 8.330 10.750 .365 770.7 $1900.00
PVC 7912 † 12”x20’ 03961 120’ 7.144 12.750 .406 1019.0 $2778.00
PVC 7914 † 14”x20’ 04862 60’ 4.160 14.000 .437 1205.0 $3281.00
PVC 7916 † 16”x20’ 04918 60’ 5.000 16.000 .500 1575.7 $4290.00
NOTE: When ordering, please specify plain end or bell end. For
truckloads of mixed sizes, multiply skids desired by truckload
percent per skid.
>> PVC Schedule 40 DWV Pipe
Possession of this price list shall not be construed as an offer to sell the products listed.
PVC Schedule 40 DWV Pipe
PVC SCHEDULE 40 (WHITE) PLAIN END PVC 1120 ASTM D 2665
TRUCKLOAD PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL (IN.) WT. PER LIST PRICE 611942- SKID PER SKID 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
NSF Listed. Meets All Requirements of ASTM D 1784, ASTM D 1785,
and ASTM D 2665.
All products manufactured by Charlotte Pipe and
Foundry Company are proudly made in the U.S.A.
* Dual marked ASTM D 1785 and ASTM D 2665.
† Triple Marked ASTM D 1785 & ASTM D 2665 & ASTM F 480.
• NEVER test with or transport/store
compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS /
CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings.
• NEVER test PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast
Iron pipe or fittings with compressed
air or gas, or air over water boosters.
• ONLY use PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast Iron
pipe or fittings for water or approved
chemicals.
• Refer to warnings on PPFA’s website
and ASTM D 1785.
Testing with or use of compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS
/ CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings can result in explosive
failures and cause severe injury or death.
9
M ADEIN
U .S.A.
PVC 4005 1⁄2”x10’ 06658 4500’ 2.083 .840 .109 600 PSI 15.9 $ 41.60
PVC 4005 1⁄2”x20’ 03922 9000’ 4.166 .840 .109 600 PSI 15.9 $ 41.60
PVC 4007 3⁄4”x10’ 06661 3500’ 2.083 1.050 .113 480 PSI 21.1 $ 54.00
PVC 4007 3⁄4”x20’ 03925 7000’ 4.166 1.050 .113 480 PSI 21.1 $ 54.00
PVC 4010 1”x10’ 06664 3000’ 2.083 1.315 .133 450 PSI 31.3 $ 79.60
PVC 4010 1”x20’ 03928 6000’ 4.166 1.315 .133 450 PSI 31.3 $ 79.60
PVC 7100* 11⁄4”x10’ 03945 2120’ 1.780 1.660 .140 370 PSI 42.4 $106.00
PVC 7100* 11⁄4”x20’ 03946 4240’ 4.166 1.660 .140 370 PSI 42.4 $106.00
PVC 7112* 11⁄2”x10’ 03947 1650’ 1.780 1.900 .145 330 PSI 51.8 $124.00
PVC 7112* 11⁄2”x20’ 03948 3300’ 3.570 1.900 .145 330 PSI 51.8 $124.00
PVC 7200* 2”x10’ 03949 990’ 1.780 2.375 .154 280 PSI 69.5 $162.00
PVC 7200* 2”x20’ 03950 1980’ 3.570 2.375 .154 280 PSI 69.5 $162.00
PVC 4025‡ 21⁄2”x20’ 04205 1360’ 3.570 2.875 .203 300 PSI 110.0 $257.00
PVC 7300* 3”x10’ 03951 1040’ 4.160 3.500 .216 260 PSI 144.2 $326.00
PVC 7300* 3”x20’ 03952 920’ 3.570 3.500 .216 260 PSI 144.2 $326.00
PVC 7400† 4”x10’ 03953 600’ 4.160 4.500 .237 220 PSI 205.5 $460.00
PVC 7400† 4”x20’ 03954 1200’ 7.144 4.500 .237 220 PSI 205.5 $460.00
PVC 7500† 5”x20’ 04837 760’ 7.144 5.563 .258 190 PSI 272.5 $630.00
PVC 7600† 6”x10’ 03955 280’ 4.160 6.625 .280 180 PSI 361.2 $816.00
PVC 7600† 6”x20’ 03956 560’ 8.330 6.625 .280 180 PSI 361.2 $816.00
PVC 7800† 8”x10’ 13087 180’ 4.160 8.625 .322 160 PSI 543.6 $1240.00
PVC 7800† 8”x20’ 03958 360’ 8.330 8.625 .322 160 PSI 543.6 $1240.00
PVC 7910† 10”x20’ 03959 220’ 8.330 10.750 .365 140 PSI 770.7 $1900.00
PVC 7912† 12”x20’ 03961 120’ 7.144 12.750 .406 130 PSI 1019.0 $2778.00
PVC 7914† 14”x20’ 04862 60’ 4.160 14.000 .437 130 PSI 1205.0 $3281.00
PVC 7916† 16”x20’ 04918 60’ 5.000 16.000 .500 130 PSI 1575.7 $4290.00
PVC SCHEDULE 40 (WHITE) PLAIN END PVC 1120 ASTM D 1785
TRUCKLOAD MAX WORK PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL (IN.) PRESSURE WT. PER LIST PRICE 611942- SKID PER SKID AT 23° C OR 73° F 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
>> PVC Schedule 40 Pipe - Plain End
PVC Pipe: Schedule 40
* Dual marked ASTM D 1785 and ASTM D 2665.
† Triple Marked ASTM D 1785 & ASTM D 2665 & ASTM F 480.
‡ Dual marked ASTM D 1785 and ASTM F 480.
NOTE: When ordering, please specify plain end or bell end.
NSF Listed. Meets All Requirements of ASTM D 1784 and ASTM D 1785.
All products manufactured by Charlotte Pipe and
Foundry Company are proudly made in the U.S.A.
• NEVER test with or transport/store
compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS /
CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings.
• NEVER test PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings with compressed
air or gas, or air over water boosters.
• ONLY use PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast Iron
pipe or fittings for water or approved
chemicals.• Refer to warnings on PPFA’s website
and ASTM D 1785.
Testing with or use of compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS
/ CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings can result in explosive
failures and cause severe injury or death.
10
PVC 4005B** 1⁄2”x10’ 04986 6000’ 2.083 .840 .109 600 PSI 2.00 15.9 $ 41.60
PVC 4005B** 1⁄2”x20’ 03923 9000’ 4.166 .840 .109 600 PSI 2.00 15.9 $ 41.60
PVC 4007B** 3⁄4”x10’ 04987 4000’ 2.083 1.050 .113 480 PSI 2.25 21.1 $ 54.00
PVC 4007B** 3⁄4”x20’ 03926 7000’ 4.166 1.050 .113 480 PSI 2.25 21.1 $ 54.00
PVC 4010B** 1”x10’ 04988 3000’ 1.780 1.315 .133 450 PSI 2.50 31.3 $ 79.60
PVC 4010B** 1”x20’ 03929 6000’ 3.570 1.315 .133 450 PSI 2.50 31.1 $ 79.60
PVC 4012B§ 11⁄4”x10’ 04989 2000’ 2.083 1.660 .140 370 PSI 2.75 42.4 $108.40
PVC 4012B§ 11⁄4”x20’ 03930 4000’ 3.570 1.660 .140 370 PSI 2.75 42.4 $108.40
PVC 4015B§ 11⁄2”x10’ 04990 1650’ 1.785 1.900 .145 330 PSI 3.00 51.8 $127.60
PVC 4015B§ 11⁄2”x20’ 03931 3300’ 3.570 1.900 .145 330 PSI 3.00 51.8 $127.60
PVC 4020B† 2”x10’ 04991 990’ 1.786 2.375 .154 280 PSI 4.00 69.5 $165.60
PVC 4020B† 2”x20’ 03932 1980’ 3.570 2.375 .154 280 PSI 4.00 69.5 $165.60
PVC 4025B‡ 21⁄2”x20’ 04206 1360’ 3.570 2.875 .203 300 PSI 4.00 110.0 $262.00
PVC 7300B§ 3”x10’ 04853 1040’ 4.160 3.500 .216 260 PSI 4.00 147.6 $340.00
PVC 4030B† 3”x20’ 03933 920’ 3.570 3.500 .216 260 PSI 4.00 144.2 $340.00
PVC 7400B§ 4”x10’ 04835 540’ 4.160 4.500 .237 220 PSI 4.00 212.3 $489.00
PVC 9400B† 4”x20’ 03964 1080’ 7.144 4.500 .237 220 PSI 5.00 210.6 $489.00
PVC 7600B§ 6”x10’ 04850 240’ 4.160 6.625 .280 180 PSI 6.50 379.3 $852.00
PVC 9600B† 6”x20’ 03965 480’ 7.144 6.625 .280 180 PSI 6.50 373.2 $852.00
PVC 7800B† 8”x10’ 09903 100’ 2.500 8.625 .322 160 PSI 7.00 556.9 $1296.00
PVC 9800B† 8”x20’ 03967 200’ 5.000 8.625 .322 160 PSI 7.00 564.0 $1296.00
PVC 7910B† 10”x20’ 03960 160’ 6.250 10.750 .365 140 PSI 9.00 781.4 $1940.00
PVC 7912B† 12”x20’ 03962 120’ 7.144 12.750 .406 130 PSI 10.00 1033.2 $2836.00
PVC 7914B† 14”x20’ 04863 60’ 4.160 14.000 .437 130 PSI 10.00 1221.8 $3350.00
PVC 7916B† 16”x20’ 04929 60’ 5.000 16.000 .500 130 PSI 10.00 1594.5 $4380.00
>> PVC Schedule 40 Pipe - Bell End*
* Bell dimensions meet either ASTM D 2672 or ASTM F 480,
depending upon pipe diameter
** ASTM D 1785
§ Dual Marked ASTM D 1785 & ASTM D 2665
† Triple Marked ASTM D 1785 & ASTM D 2665 & ASTM F 480
‡ Dual Marked ASTM D 1785 & ASTM F 480
PVC SCHEDULE 40 (WHITE) BELL END PVC 1120 ASTM D 1785
TRUCKLOAD MAX WORK PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL (IN.) PRESSURE BELL DEPTH WT. PER LIST PRICE 611942- PER SKID SKID AT 23° C OR 73° F (IN.) 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
All products manufactured by Charlotte Pipe and
Foundry Company are proudly made in the U.S.A.
M ADEINU.S.A.
• NEVER test with or transport/store
compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS /
CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings.
• NEVER test PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast
Iron pipe or fittings with compressed
air or gas, or air over water boosters.
• ONLY use PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast Iron
pipe or fittings for water or approved
chemicals.
• Refer to warnings on PPFA’s website
and ASTM D 1785.
Testing with or use of compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS
/ CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings can result in explosive
failures and cause severe injury or death.
11
PVC 23155B *1⁄2”x20’ 03991 9000’ 3.570 .840 .062 315 PSI 2.00 10.0 $ 27.00
PVC 20007B 3⁄4”x10’ 10742 3500’ 2.083 1.050 .060 200 PSI 2.25 12.7 $ 32.80
PVC 20007B 3⁄4”x20’ 03984 7000’ 3.570 1.050 .060 200 PSI 2.25 12.7 $ 32.80
PVC 20010B 1”x20’ 03986 6000’ 4.166 1.315 .063 200 PSI 2.50 16.9 $ 42.00
PVC 20012B 11⁄4”x20’ 03987 4000’ 4.166 1.660 .079 200 PSI 2.75 25.5 $ 66.00
PVC 20015B 11⁄2”x20’ 03988 3300’ 3.570 1.900 .090 200 PSI 3.00 32.4 $ 86.40
PVC 20020B 2”x20’ 03989 1980’ 3.570 2.375 .113 200 PSI 4.00 50.8 $126.00
*PR 315 / SDR 13.5
PVC 16012B 11⁄4”x20’ 04211 4000’ 4.166 1.660 .064 160 PSI 2.75 21.5 $ 52.00
PVC 16015B 11⁄2”x20’ 04210 3300’ 3.570 1.900 .073 160 PSI 3.00 27.0 $ 67.00
PVC 16020B 2”x20’ 04212 1980’ 3.570 2.375 .091 160 PSI 4.00 41.4 $103.00
PVC 16030B 3”x20’ 04222 960’ 3.570 3.500 .135 160 PSI 4.00 90.8 $223.00
NOTE: When ordering, please specify plain end or bell end.
PR 200 PVC 1120 BELL END ASTM D 2241 SDR 21
TRUCKLOAD MAX WORK PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL (IN.) PRESSURE BELL DEPTH WT. PER LIST PRICE 611942- SKID PER SKID AT 23° C OR 73° F (IN.) 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
PR 160 PVC 1120 BELL END ASTM D 2241 SDR 26
>> PVC SDR Pipe
TRUCKLOAD MAX WORK PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL (IN.) PRESSURE BELL DEPTH WT. PER LIST PRICE 611942- SKID PER SKID AT 23° C OR 73° F (IN.) 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
PVC 4020B 2”x20’ 03932 1980’ 3.570 2.375 .154 4.00 69.5 $ 165.60
PVC 4025B 21⁄2”x20’ 04206 1360’ 3.570 2.875 .203 4.00 110.0 $ 262.00
PVC 4030B 3”x20’ 03933 920’ 3.570 3.500 .216 4.00 144.2 $ 340.00
PVC 9400B 4”x20’ 03964 1080’ 7.144 4.500 .237 5.00 210.6 $ 489.00
PVC 9600B 6”x20’ 03965 480’ 7.144 6.625 .280 6.50 373.2 $ 852.00
PVC 9800B 8”x20’ 03967 200’ 5.000 8.625 .322 7.00 564.0 $1296.00
PVC 7910B 10” x 20’ 03960 160’ 6.250 10.750 .365 9.00 781.4 $1940.00
PVC 7912B 12” x 20’ 03962 120’ 7.144 12.750 .406 10.00 1033.2 $2836.00
PVC 7914B 14” x 20’ 04863 60’ 4.160 14.000 .437 10.00 1221.8 $3350.00
PVC 7916B 16” x 20’ 04929 60’ 5.000 16.000 .500 10.00 1594.5 $4380.00
>> PVC Well Casing
PVC SCHEDULE 40 (WHITE) BELL END WELL CASING PVC 1120 ASTM F 480
TRUCKLOAD PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL (IN.) BELL DEPTH WT. PER LIST PRICE 611942- SKID PER SKID (IN.) 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
All products manufactured by Charlotte Pipe and
Foundry Company are proudly made in the U.S.A.
M ADEINU.S.A.
• NEVER test with or transport/store
compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS /
CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings.
• NEVER test PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast
Iron pipe or fittings with compressed
air or gas, or air over water boosters.
• ONLY use PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast Iron
pipe or fittings for water or approved
chemicals.
• Refer to warnings on PPFA’s website and ASTM D 1785.
Testing with or use of compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS
/ CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings can result in explosive
failures and cause severe injury or death.
12
>> CPVC Copper Tube Size Pipe
NOTE: STRAIGHT LENGTH PIPE ARE SHIPPED IN FULL BUNDLE QUANTITY ONLY.
Possession of this price list shall not be construed as an offer to sell the products listed. FlowGuard Gold is a registered trademark of Lubrizol Corp.
FlowGuard Gold® Pipe
NSF Listed. Meets All Requirements of ASTM D 2846.
STRAIGHT LENGTHS PLAIN END SDR 11 CPVC COPPER TUBE SIZE PIPE ASTM D 2846
TRUCKLOAD MAX WORK PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT QTY. PER AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL PRESSURE WT. PER LIST PRICE 611942- BUNDLE PER SKID SKID (IN.) AT 23° C OR 73° F 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
CTS 12005 1⁄2” x 10’ 04979 500’ 2.083 12,000’ .625 .068 400 PSI 8.3 $242.00
CTS 12005 1⁄2” x 20’ 04993 1,000’ 5.000 24,000’ .625 .068 400 PSI 8.3 $242.00
CTS 12007 3⁄4” x 10’ 04980 250’ 2.083 6,000’ .875 .080 400 PSI 13.9 $372.00
CTS 12007 3⁄4” x 20’ 05145 500’ 5.000 12,000’ .875 .080 400 PSI 13.9 $372.00
CTS 12010 1” x 10’ 05146 150’ 2.083 3,600’ 1.125 .102 400 PSI 22.2 $798.00
CTS 12010 1” x 20’ 05147 300’ 5.000 7,200’ 1.125 .102 400 PSI 22.2 $798.00
CTS 12012 11⁄4” x 10’ 05148 100’ 2.083 2,400’ 1.375 .125 400 PSI 33.3 $1,393.00
CTS 12012 11⁄4” x 20’ 05321 200’ 5.000 4,800’ 1.375 .125 400 PSI 33.3 $1,393.00
CTS 12015 11⁄2” x 10’ 05150 60’ 2.083 1,440’ 1.625 .148 400 PSI 46.6 $1,853.00
CTS 12015 11⁄2” x 20’ 05306 120’ 5.000 2,880’ 1.625 .148 400 PSI 46.6 $1,853.00
CTS 12020 2” x 10’ 05152 40’ 2.083 960’ 2.125 .193 400 PSI 79.5 $3,127.00
CTS 12020 2” x 20’ 05322 80’ 5.000 1,920’ 2.125 .193 400 PSI 79.5 $3,127.00
CTS 12005 1⁄2” x 150’ 05313 150’ 4.166 3,750’ .625 .068 400 PSI 8.3 $415.00
CTS 12007 3⁄4” x 100’ 05314 100’ 4.166 2,500’ .875 .080 400 PSI 13.9 $820.00
CTS 12010 1” x 100’ 10643 100’ 4.166 1,200’ 1.125 .102 400 PSI 22.2 $1,491.00
COILED PIPE SDR 11 COILED SDR CPVC COPPER TUBE SIZE PIPE ASTM D 2846
TRUCKLOAD MAX WORK PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT QTY. PER AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL PRESSURE WT. PER LIST PRICE 611942- BUNDLE PER SKID SKID (IN.) AT 23° C OR 73° F 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
All products manufactured by Charlotte Pipe and
Foundry Company are proudly made in the U.S.A.
M ADEINU.S.A.
• NEVER test with or transport/store compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS /
CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings.• NEVER test PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast
Iron pipe or fittings with compressed
air or gas, or air over water boosters.
• ONLY use PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast Iron
pipe or fittings for water or approved
chemicals.
• Refer to warnings on PPFA’s website
and ASTM D 1785.
Testing with or use of compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS
/ CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings can result in explosive
failures and cause severe injury or death.
13
Possession of this price list shall not be construed as an offer to sell the products listed.
ReUze and “You can’t beat the system” are registered trademarks of Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Company.
ReUze® Pipe
>> CPVC Copper-Tube-Size Pipe for Non-Potable Water Distribution
NOTE: STRAIGHT LENGTH PIPE ARE SHIPPED IN FULL BUNDLE QUANTITY ONLY.
STRAIGHT LENGTHS PLAIN END SDR 11 CPVC COPPER TUBE SIZE PIPE ASTM D 2846
TRUCKLOAD MAX WORK PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT QTY. PER AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL PRESSURE WT. PER LIST PRICE 611942- BUNDLE PER SKID SKID (IN.) AT 23° C OR 73° F 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
CTS 12005 RU 1⁄2” x 20’ 11642 1,000’ 5.000 24,000’ .625 .068 400 PSI 8.3 $156.00
CTS 12007 RU 3⁄4” x 20’ 11643 500’ 5.000 12,000’ .875 .080 400 PSI 13.9 $282.00
CTS 12010 RU 1” x 20’ 11644 300’ 5.000 7,200’ 1.125 .102 400 PSI 22.2 $575.00
CTS 12015 RU 11⁄2” x 20’ 11645 120’ 5.000 2,880’ 1.625 .148 400 PSI 46.6 $1,133.00
CTS 12020 RU 2” x 20’ 11646 80’ 5.000 1,920’ 2.125 .193 400 PSI 79.5 $1,918.00
NSF Listed. Meets All Requirements of ASTM D 2846.
Due to conflicting requirements in the plumbing codes,
pipe marking may not be in conformance with local code
requirements. Check code requirements for conformance
with all local plumbing and building codes.
M ADEINU.S.A.
All products manufactured by Charlotte Pipe and
Foundry Company are proudly made in the U.S.A.
• NEVER test with or transport/store
compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS /
CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings.
• NEVER test PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast
Iron pipe or fittings with compressed
air or gas, or air over water boosters.
• ONLY use PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast Iron
pipe or fittings for water or approved
chemicals.
• Refer to warnings on PPFA’s website
and ASTM D 1785.
Testing with or use of compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS
/ CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings can result in explosive
failures and cause severe injury or death.
14
PVC 10002 1⁄4”x20’ 04920 15140’ 2.083 0.540 .119 1130 PSI 10.0 $ 117.40
PVC 10003 3⁄8”x20’ 04917 9360’ 2.083 0.675 .126 920 PSI 13.8 $ 132.95
PVC 10005 1⁄2”x20’ 03968 6880’ 2.083 0.840 .147 850 PSI 20.3 $ 55.60
PVC 10007 3⁄4”x20’ 03969 4200’ 2.083 1.050 .154 690 PSI 27.5 $ 72.00
PVC 10010 1”x20’ 03970 3540’ 2.191 1.315 .179 630 PSI 40.5 $ 105.00
PVC 10012 11⁄4”x20’ 03973 4240’ 4.166 1.660 .191 520 PSI 55.9 $ 141.00
PVC 10015 11⁄2”x20’ 03976 3300’ 3.570 1.900 .200 470 PSI 67.7 $ 169.00
PVC 10020 2”x20’ 03977 1980’ 3.570 2.375 .218 400 PSI 93.6 $ 228.00
PVC 10025 21⁄2”x20’ 03978 1360’ 3.570 2.875 .276 420 PSI 142.8 $ 284.00
PVC 10030 3”x20’ 03979 960’ 3.570 3.500 .300 370 PSI 194.2 $ 448.00
PVC 10040 4”x20’ 03980 1080’ 7.144 4.500 .337 320 PSI 279.3 $ 652.00
PVC 10060 6”x20’ 03981 480’ 7.144 6.625 .432 280 PSI 532.7 $1255.00
PVC 10080 8”x20’ 04175 300’ 8.330 8.625 .500 250 PSI 808.9 $1852.00
PVC 10100 10”x20’ 04768 160’ 7.144 10.750 .593 230 PSI 1199.3 $2760.00
PVC 10120 12”x20’ 04770 120’ 8.928 12.750 .687 230 PSI 1650.1 $3795.00
PVC 10140 14”x20’ 04816 60’ 4.160 14.000 .750 220 PSI 1930.0 $4830.00
PVC 10160 16”x20’ 04919 60’ 5.000 16.000 .843 220 PSI 2544.1 $6106.00
>> PVC Schedule 80 Pipe, Type 1, Grade 1 - Plain End
Possession of this price list shall not be construed as an offer to sell the products listed.
PVC Schedule 80 Pipe
PVC SCHEDULE 80 (GRAY) PLAIN END PVC 1120
TRUCKLOAD MAX WORK PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL (IN.) PRESSURE WT. PER LIST PRICE 611942- SKID PER SKID AT 23° C OR 73° F 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
ASTM D 1784 & ASTM D 1785
NOTE: For truckloads of mixed sizes, multiply skids desired by truckload
percent per skid.
Full pallets are polyethylene wrapped for cleanliness and UV protection.
NSF Listed. Meets All Requirements of ASTM D 1784
and ASTM D 1785.
M A DEINU.S.A.
All products manufactured by Charlotte Pipe and
Foundry Company are proudly made in the U.S.A.
• NEVER test with or transport/store
compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS /
CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings.
• NEVER test PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast
Iron pipe or fittings with compressed
air or gas, or air over water boosters.
• ONLY use PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast Iron
pipe or fittings for water or approved
chemicals.
• Refer to warnings on PPFA’s website
and ASTM D 1785.
Testing with or use of compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS
/ CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings can result in explosive
failures and cause severe injury or death.
15
PVC 10005B 1⁄2”x20’ 04924 6880’ 2.083 0.840 .147 850 PSI 20.3 $ 59.00
PVC 10007B 3⁄4”x20’ 04925 4200’ 2.083 1.050 .154 690 PSI 27.0 $ 76.00
PVC 10010B 1”x20’ 04926 3540’ 2.083 1.315 .179 630 PSI 40.5 $ 111.00
PVC 10012B 11⁄4”x20’ 04927 4240’ 4.166 1.660 .191 520 PSI 55.9 $ 148.00
PVC 10015B 11⁄2”x20’ 04928 3300’ 3.570 1.900 .200 470 PSI 67.7 $ 178.00
PVC 10020B 2”x20’ 04764 1980’ 3.570 2.375 .218 400 PSI 93.6 $ 230.00
PVC 10025B 21⁄2”x20’ 04875 1360’ 3.570 2.875 .276 420 PSI 142.8 $ 286.00
PVC 10030B 3”x20’ 04776 960’ 3.570 3.500 .300 370 PSI 191.1 $ 450.00
PVC 10040B 4”x20’ 04774 1080’ 7.144 4.500 .337 320 PSI 279.3 $ 654.00
PVC 10060B 6”x20’ 04763 480’ 7.144 6.625 .432 280 PSI 532.7 $1256.00
PVC 10080B 8”x20’ 04766 300’ 7.144 8.625 .500 250 PSI 808.9 $1853.00
PVC 10100B 10”x20’ 04769 160’ 8.928 10.750 .593 230 PSI 1199.3 $2762.00
PVC 10120B 12”x20’ 04771 120’ 7.144 12.750 .687 230 PSI 1650.1 $3797.00
PVC 10140B 14”x20’ 04832 60’ 4.160 14.000 .750 220 PSI 1930.0 $4830.00
PVC 10160B 16”x20’ 09372 60’ 5.000 16.000 .843 220 PSI 2544.1 $6106.00
>> PVC Schedule 80 Pipe, Type 1, Grade 1 - Belled End
Possession of this price list shall not be construed as an offer to sell the products listed.
PVC SCHEDULE 80 (GRAY) BELLED-END PVC 1120
TRUCKLOAD MAX WORK PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL (IN.) PRESSURE WT. PER LIST PRICE 611942- SKID PER SKID AT 23° C OR 73° F 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
ASTM D 1784 & ASTM D 1785
NOTE: For truckloads of mixed sizes, multiply skids desired by truckload
percent per skid.
Full pallets are polyethylene wrapped for cleanliness and UV
protection.
NSF Listed. Meets All Requirements of ASTM D 1784
and ASTM D 1785.
M A DEINU.S.A.
PVC Schedule 80 Pipe
All products manufactured by Charlotte Pipe and
Foundry Company are proudly made in the U.S.A.
• NEVER test with or transport/store
compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS /
CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings.
• NEVER test PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast
Iron pipe or fittings with compressed
air or gas, or air over water boosters.
• ONLY use PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast Iron
pipe or fittings for water or approved
chemicals.
• Refer to warnings on PPFA’s website
and ASTM D 1785.
Testing with or use of compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS
/ CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings can result in explosive
failures and cause severe injury or death.
16
>>ChemDrain® CPVC Schedule 40 Pipe, Type IV, Grade 1
Possession of this price list shall not be construed as an offer to sell the products listed.ChemDrain is a registered trademark of Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Company.
ChemDrain® CPVC Pipe
ASTM D 1784 & ASTM F 2618
NOTE: For truckloads of mixed sizes, multiply skids desired by truckload percent per skid.
Full skids of pipe are polyethylene wrapped for cleanliness and UV protection.
NSF Listed. Meets All Requirements of ASTM D 1784 and ASTM F 2618.
For Non-Pressure Applications
AW 14015 11⁄2” x 10’ 10732 1650’ 1.780 1.900 .145 55.3 $ 727.00
AW 14002 2” x 10’ 10733 990’ 1.780 2.375 .154 74.3 $ 982.00
AW 14003 3” x 10’ 10734 1040’ 4.160 3.500 .216 154.2 $ 1,776.00
AW 14004 4” x 10’ 10735 600’ 4.160 4.500 .237 219.6 $ 2,520.00
AW 14006 6” x 10’ 10736 280’ 4.160 6.625 .280 386.1 $ 4,551.00
AW 14008 8” x 10’ 11363 180’ 4.160 8.625 .322 581.1 $ 8,791.00
CPVC SCHEDULE 40 (LIGHT GRAY) PLAIN END CPVC 4120
TRUCKLOAD PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL WT. PER LIST PRICE 611942- SKID PER SKID (IN.) 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
NOT FOR PRESSURE
Do not use ChemDrain CPVC pipe for pressure
applications. The use of ChemDrain CPVC pipe in pressure
applications may result in system failure and property
damage.
All products manufactured by Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Company are proudly made in the U.S.A.
• NEVER test with or transport/store
compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS /
CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings.
• NEVER test PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast
Iron pipe or fittings with compressed
air or gas, or air over water boosters.
• ONLY use PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast Iron
pipe or fittings for water or approved
chemicals.
• Refer to warnings on PPFA’s website
and ASTM D 1785.
Testing with or use of compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS
/ CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings can result in explosive
failures and cause severe injury or death.
17
S/M 6004G 4”x14’ 11920 840 5.556 14’-0” 110.4 4.215 .120 $ 286.00
S/M 6004G 4”x20’ 04012 1200 7.144 20’-0” 109.7 4.215 .120 286.00
S/M 6006G 6”x14’ 11921 392 5.556 14’-0” 249.6 6.275 .180 546.00
S/M 6006G 6”x20’ 04016 560 8.330 20’-0” 247.0 6.275 .180 546.00
S/M 6008G 8”x14’ 11922 140 3.333 14’-0” 451.0 8.400 .240 928.00
S/M 6004 4”x10’ 04008 600 4.160 10’-0” 108.3 4.215 .120 $ 276.00
S/M 6004 4”x20’ 04009 1200 7.144 20’-0” 108.3 4.215 .120 276.00
S/M 6006 6”x10’ 04013 280 4.160 10’-0” 241.7 6.275 .180 532.00
S/M 6006 6”x20’ 04014 560 8.330 20’-0” 241.7 6.275 .180 532.00
>>PVC SDR 35 PSM Pipe
Possession of this price list shall not be construed as an offer to sell the products listed.
PVC Sewer Pipe
SDR-35 GASKETED - PS 46
TRUCKLOAD PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT LAYING WT. PER AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL (IN.) LIST PRICE 611942- SKID PER SKID LENGTH 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
ASTM D 3034 & ASTM F 477
SDR-35 SOLVENT WELD - PS 46
TRUCKLOAD PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT LAYING WT. PER AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL (IN.) LIST PRICE 611942- SKID PER SKID LENGTH 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
Weight is approximate and is for shipping purposes only.
Weight is approximate and is for shipping purposes only.
Meets All Requirements of ASTM D 3034. SDR 35 Gaskets meet or
exceed ASTM F 477. Gasketed joints meet ASTM D 3212.
NOTE: For truckloads of mixed sizes, multiply skids desired by truck-
load percent per skid.
NOT FOR PRESSURE
Do not use PVC Sewer pipe for pressure applications. The
use of sewer pipe in pressure applications may result in
system failure and property damage.
• NEVER test with or transport/store
compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS /
CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings.
• NEVER test PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast
Iron pipe or fittings with compressed
air or gas, or air over water boosters.
• ONLY use PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast Iron
pipe or fittings for water or approved
chemicals.
• Refer to warnings on PPFA’s website
and ASTM D 1785.
Testing with or use of compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS
/ CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings can result in explosive
failures and cause severe injury or death.
18
NOT FOR PRESSURE
Do not use PVC Sewer pipe for pressure applications. The
use of sewer pipe in pressure applications may result in
system failure and property damage.
All products manufactured by Charlotte Pipe and
Foundry Company are proudly made in the U.S.A.
Possession of this price list shall not be construed as an offer to sell the products listed.
PVC Sewer and Drain Pipe
Perforated pipe is supplied with two rows of 1/2” diameter holes every five inches. Rows are parallel to the pipe
axis and are 120° apart.
Weight is approximate and is for shipping purposes only.
NOTE: For truckloads of mixed sizes, multiply skids desired by truckload percent per skid.
Pipe listed in this section meets or exceeds the requirements of ASTM D 2729.
PVC 30030 3”x10’ 10903 810’ 3.125 3.250 0.070 3.00 52.8 $ 110.00
PVC 30040 4”x10’ 10905 500’ 3.125 4.215 0.075 3.50 70.4 $ 130.00
>> PVC ASTM D 2729 Pipe
SOLVENT WELD BELLED END ASTM D 2729
TRUCKLOAD PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL (IN.) BELL DEPTH WT. PER LIST PRICE 611942- SKID PER SKID (IN.) 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
PVC 30030P 3”x10’ 11814 1040’ 4.160 3.250 0.070 3.00 52.8 $ 110.00
PVC 30040P 4”x10’ 11815 500’ 3.125 4.215 0.075 3.50 70.4 $ 130.00
>> Perforated PVC ASTM D 2729 Pipe
SOLVENT WELD BELLED END ASTM D 2729
TRUCKLOAD PART NO. NOM. SIZE UPC # QTY. PER PERCENT AVG. OD (IN.) MIN. WALL (IN.) BELL DEPTH WT. PER LIST PRICE 611942- SKID PER SKID (IN.) 100 FT. (LBS.) PER 100 FT.
• NEVER test with or transport/store
compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS /
CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings.
• NEVER test PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast
Iron pipe or fittings with compressed
air or gas, or air over water boosters.
• ONLY use PVC / ABS / CPVC / Cast Iron
pipe or fittings for water or approved
chemicals.
• Refer to warnings on PPFA’s website
and ASTM D 1785.
Testing with or use of compressed air or gas in PVC / ABS
/ CPVC / Cast Iron pipe or fittings can result in explosive
failures and cause severe injury or death.
19
Charlotte Pipe offers a wide variety of information from product specifications, design and engineering
data to installation procedures as well as special considerations in our Plastics Technical and Installation
Manual. For complete safety, installation and application information please call 800-438-6091. You may
also get information 24 hours a day by calling our fax on demand number at 800-745-9382 or by visiting
our website at www.charlottepipe.com.
Failure to follow safety and installation instructions may result in damage, injury or death.
Additional Information
PO BOX 35430
CHARLOTTE
NORTH CAROLINA 28235
PHONE [phone]
[phone]
FAX [phone]
LITERATURE BY FAX [phone]
WWW.CHARLOTTEPIPE.COM
All products manufactured by
Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Company
are proudly made in the U.S.A.

Irrigation System Characteristics
and Costs
Prepared by:
Ronald E. Sneed, Professor and Extension Specialist
Biological and Agricultural Engineering
North Carolina State University
Published by: North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service
Publication Number: EBAE 178-93
Last Electronic Revision: March 1996 (JWM)

Hand-Move (Sprinkler)
Characteristics
initial cost: medium
operating cost: medium
labor: intensive
acreage: small
pressure: medium
pipe: aluminum
smallest recommended nozzle diameter: 0.25"
application rate: 0.25" to 0.50"/hr
maximum recommended event application: 0.50" to 1.00"
consider used equipment

Hand-Move (Gun Sprinkler)
Characteristics

initial cost: medium
operating cost: medium to high
labor: medium
acreage: small to medium
pressure: medium to high
pipe: aluminum
application rate: 0.30" to 0.75"/hr
maximum recommended event application: 0.50" to 1.00"
consider used equipment
runoff potential
affected by wind
flush lines after pumping sludge

Solid-Set (Sprinkler)
Characteristics

initial cost: high
operating cost: medium
labor: low to medium
acreage: small
pressure: medium
pipe: aluminum
smallest recommended nozzle diameter: 0.25"
application rate: 0.25" to 0.50"/hr
maximum recommended event application: 0.50" to 1.00
consider used equipment

Solid-Set (Gun Sprinkler)
Characteristics

initial cost: high
operating cost: medium to high
labor: low to medium
acreage: small to medium
oressure: medium to high
pipe: aluminum
application rate: 0.30" to 0.75"/hr
maximum recommended event application: 0.50" to 1.00"
consider used equipment
runoff potential
affected by wind
flush lines after pumping sludge

Permanent (Sprinkler)
Characteristics

initial cost: medium to high
operating cost: medium
labor: low to medium
acreage: small to medium
pressure: medium
pipe: PVC
smallest recommended nozzle diameter: 0.25"
application rate: 0.25 n to 0.35"/hr
maximum recommended event application: 0.50" to 1.00"

System Components
System Lateral Lateral Main Main Motor
size size length size length & pump

(ac) (in) (ft) (in) (ft) (hp)

5 2 2,880 3 1,500 7.5
10 2 5,740 3 1,500 7.5
20 2.5 11,400 3 2,000 10 *
30 3 17,020 4 2,500 15 **
40 4 22,600 4 3,000 25 **

* Some power companies will allow single-phase, most desire 3-phase.

** Can only use 3-phase.

System Component Costs
System Lateral Main Valve Sprinkler,* Pump Misc Total
size cost cost cost & riser & &
(number) swing joint motor
(& number)

(Ac) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)

5 576 675 490 ( 35) 300 ( 6) 1,600 300 3,941
10 1,148 675 980 ( 90) 300 ( 6) 1,600 600 5,303
20 3,990 900 1,960 (140) 450 ( 9) 2,100 1,000 10,400
30 7,659 1,625 2,940 (210) 600 (12) 2,500 1,500 16,824
40 14,690 1,950 3,920 (280) 850 (17) 3,200 2,000 26,610
* 20 percent extra sprinkters for each system.

System Cost Per Acre *
Size Equipment Contract
(ac) cost/ac installation **

5 $ 788 $ 524 ($ .60/ft)
10 $ 530 $ 434 ($ .60/ft)
20 $ 520 $ 436 ($ .65/ft)
30 $ 561 $ 553 ($ .85/ft)
40 $ 665 $ 640 ($1.00/ft)
* Gate valves on each lateral wouldd add about $50/ac.
Water meter at pump would add $10 - 50/ac
** Grouer doing oun instattation coutd significantly reduce these costs

Permanent (Gun Sprinkler)
Characteristics

initial cost: medium to high
operating cost: medium to high
labor: low to medium
acreage: small to medium
pressure: medium to high
pipe: PVC
application rate: 0.30" to 0.75"/hr
maximum recommended evenc application: 0.50" to 1. oo"
runoff potential
affected by wind
flush lines after pumping sludge

Hard-Hose Traveler
Characteristics

initial cost: medium
operating cost: high
labor: low
acreage: medium
pressure: high
main line pipe: aluminum or PVC
hard hose: polyethylene
application rate: 0.40" to 0.75"/hr
maximum recommended event application: 0.50" to 1.00"
runoff potential
affected by wind
portable system, need main line at each location
use engine reel drive unit for sludges
flush lines after pumping sludge

Flow Rates for Different Size Travelers
Hose size (in) Flow (gpm) *

2.5 110 - 150
3.0 170 - 230
3.3 225 - 300
3.7 - 3.75 275 - 400
4.0 - 4.2 375 - 550
4.5 500 - 670
* 3-5 psi friction Loss / 100 ft of hose.
Hard-Hose Traveler Cost *
Machine size Approximate cost

2.5 in, 800 ft hose $ 12,000
3 in, 850 - 1000 ft hose $ 15,500 - 17,000
3.3 in, 900 - 1200 ft hose $ 18,500 - 20,000
3.7 - 3.75 in, 950 - 1300 ft hose $ 22,000 - 25,000
4 - 4.2 in, 1000 - 1250 ft hose $ 23,000 - 26,000
4 in, 1500 ft hose $ 32,000 - 33,000
4.5 in, 1050 ft hose $ 23,500 - 24,500
4.5 in, 1300 ft hose $ 32,000 - 33,000
*Most units are equipped uith 3.5 to 5 hp gasoline engines.
Some may be available with small diesel engine.
Could use water drive for clean lagoon liquid.
Definitely need engine for wastewater containing solids.

Center Pivot
Characreristics

initial cost: medium
operating cost: low to medium-high
labor: low
acreage: medium to high
pressure: low, medium or high
main line pipe: PVC
sprinkler: rotary impact, gun, or spray nozzles
application rate: 0.75" to 3.00"/hr
maximum recommended event application: 0.50" to 1.00"
runoff potential
affected by wind
towable systems available
flush lines after pumping sludge

Center-Pivot Cost *
Pivot - impact sprinkler

< 1000 feet $ 35 - 40 / ft
1000 feet $ 30 - 32 / ft
> 1000 feet $ 25 - 28 / ft

Slurry shooter $ 40 - 45 / ft

Example: a 4-tower pivot with: impact sprinkler slurry shooter

approximately 760 - 780 ft $ 28,000 $ 33,000
approximately 50 ac $ 560 / ac $ 660 / ac
* Need to add pump, power unit, and slurry pipe to determine total cost of system, which
would add another $ 300 - 350 per acre.

Pipe Cost
6" Aluminum Ring-Lok $ 2.90 - 3.15 / ft
2" Class 160 PVC $ .20 - .35 / ft
2.5" Class 160 PVC $ .35 - .50 / ft
3" Class 160 PVC $ .45 - .70 / ft
4" Class 160 PVC $ .65 - 1.00 / ft
6" Class 160 PVC $ 1.40 -2.00 / ft
6" Class 200 PVC $ 1.75- 2.40 / ft
8" Class 160 PVC $ 2.40- 3.00 / ft
8" Class 200 PVC $ 2.90- 4.00 / ft

Hydrants, 6" with air-relief: $ 200 - 225 each

Pump and Power Unit Costs
3 cylinder diesel or 4 cylinder gas $ 7,000 - 8,000
and pump, 150 - 250 gpm

Small 6 cylinder gas or 4 cylinder diesel $ 9,000 - 11,000
and pump, 200 - 350 gpm

6 cylinder diesel and pump, 350 - 550 gpm $ 12,000 - 14,000

6 cylinder diesel, slurry pump, 350 - 550 gpm $ 19,000 - 21,000
with hydraulic assist pump on suction

Small PT0 pump, 150 - 250 gpm $ 1,800 - 2,300
need 40 - 50 hp tractor

Large PTO pump, 250 - 550 gpm $ 3,000 - 4,000
need 60 - 130 hp tractor

Power Costs for Applying Wastewater

System Cost / Ac*
-----------------------------
Gasonline Diesel Electric
Portable pipe (sprinkler) $ 5.65 $ 3.61 $ 4.08
Portable pipe (gun sprinkler) $ 7.53 $ 4.81 $ 5.45
Solid-set (sprinker) $ 5.33 $ 3.40 $ 3.86
Solid-set (gun sprinkler) $ 7.22 $ 4.61 $ 5.22
Permanent (sprinkler) $ 5.02 $ 3.21 $ 3.63
Permanent (gun sprinkler) $ 6.90 $ 4.41 $ 4.99
Hard-hose traveler $ 10.04 $ 6.41 $ 7.02
Center-pivot (sprinkler) $ 5.96 $ 3.81 $ 4.22
Center-pivot (gun sprinkler) $ 7.53 $ 4.81 $ 5.26

* Gasotine and diesel fuel = S1.00/gallon; electricity = $0.08/KWH; pump efficiency =
65%; gasoline engine efficiency = 65%; diesel engine efficiency = 70%; electric m•otor
efficieny = 90%. More efficient pumps would decrease pumping costs. Proper pipe size
to reduce friction loss should also reduce pumping costs.
Distributed in furtherance of the Acts of Congress of May 8 and June 30, 1914. Employment and
program opportunities are offered to all people regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, age,
or disability. North Carolina State University, North Carolina A&T State University, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, and local governments cooperating.
EBAE 178-93

Return to: BAE Extension Publications

Appendix V: Preliminary Design Calculations

Basis for Land Application Calculations:

Center Pivot Irrigator: Radius ≈ 2608 Ft
25,000 GPD = 18 gpm
Each Irrigator covers ≈ 1 acre
Land Application Area Needed = 1 acre
Therefore one center pivot at 18 gpm needed.

Conceptual Pipe Schedule:
pipe - 12" 2000.00 L.F.
pipe - 8" 500.00 L.F.
pipe - 6" 100.00 L.F.
pipe - 4" 1000.00 L.F.

feet
meters
2000
700
Case Narrative
Lab No: 20160460
The analytical results included in this report meet all applicable quality control procedure requirements except as noted below:
The test results in this report meet all NELAC requirements unless noted below:
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of ESC Lab Sciences.
All radiochemical sample results for solids are reported on a dry weight basis with the exception of tritium, carbon-14 and
radon, unless wet weight was requested by the client.
This report contains the analytical results for the 1 sample(s) received under chain of custody by ESC Lab Sciences on
5/11/2016 2:59:44 PM. These samples are associated with your Robeson County Landfill project.
Results have been reviewed by the Director of Radiochemistry or their designees and is approved for release.
Observations / Nonconformances
The following QC parameters are outside method control limits:
Ra-228 DUP RER SDG R3820
*NELAC Certified Parameter BDL = Below Detection Limit Page 1 of 2
OUTREACH LABORATORY, A Divsion of ESC Lab Sciences
Address: 311 North Aspen Avenue, Broken Arrow, OK, 74012 - EMail: [e-mail] - Tel: [phone]
2 of 2
Date Reported 06/17/16
Date Received 05/11/16
Lab Number 20160460
Client Hunt Environmental Associates
Page Number
Client Project Robeson County Landfill
:
:
:
:
:
:
Units AnalystPrep
Date
Method Result
Analytical Report
DL Analysis
Date
Qual
Lab ID 20160460-01
Client ID Leachate
Date Sampled
Matrix
5/9/2016 2:22:00 AM
NPW
:
:
:
:
Radiochemical Analyses
pCi/l20.2 +/- 7.05 JR06/07/16EPA 900*/9310*Gross Alpha 11.0 05/31/16
pCi/l67.1 +/- 7.70 JR06/07/16EPA 900*/9310*Gross Beta 11.6 05/31/16
pCi/l3.43 +/- 0.424 AK05/13/16SM 7500 Ra B M*Radium-226 0.095 05/12/16
pCi/l3.81 +/- 0.558 JR06/14/16EPA 904*/9320*Radium-228 0.617 06/10/16
Lab Approval:
DUP
RPD
DateMS
%REC
MSD
%REC RPD
Parameter
QC Report
Blank LCS
%REC
LCSD
%REC RPD
RER, NAD
or DER
20.0 103.0 6/7/201699.4Gross Beta 0.000 3.595.4 1.850
NC 102.0 5/13/201692.8Radium-226 0.032 6.987.9 0.502
NC 96.1 6/15/201698.0Radium-228 0.251 1.593.0 2.140
*NELAC Certified Parameter BDL = Below Detection Limit Page 2 of 2
OUTREACH LABORATORY, A Divsion of ESC Lab Sciences
Address: 311 North Aspen Avenue, Broken Arrow, OK, 74012 - EMail: [e-mail] - Tel: [phone]