19080_General Steel Drum_Charlotte Phase II and Baseline GW Report_20101020

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE ASSESSMENT AND
BASELINE GROUNDWATER QUALITY REPORT
General Steel Drum Facility
4500 South Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209

October 20, 2010

Prepared By:

31960 SW Charbonneau Drive, Suite 101
Wilsonville, Oregon 97070
TELEPHONE: [phone] FACSIMILE: [phone]

PROJECT NO. 0010736.00 PHASE 002

31960 SW Charbonneau Dr., Suite 101 • Wilsonville, OR 97070
phone: [phone] • fax: [phone]

October 20, 2010

Mr. Christian Stavig
Container Management Services, LLC
8435 NE Killingsworth
Portland, Oregon, 97220

REGARDING: RSV PROJECT NO. 0010736.00 PHASE 002
PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT AND BASELINE GROUNDWATER
QUALITY EVALUATION REPORT: General Steel Drum Facility
4500 South Boulevard, Charlotte, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Stavig:
RSV Engineering, Inc. (RSV) is pleased to provide the Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
(ESA) and baseline groundwater quality evaluation report for the above referenced property.
This assessment was performed as per our contract dated September 7, 2010 and associated
Change Order (No. 1) dated October 1, 2010.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide environmental services to Container Management
Services, LLC. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this report, or if we can assist
you in any other matter, please contact the undersigned at [phone].
Very truly yours,

Guy H. Tanz, R. G. (OR), L.G. (WA)
Principal Geologist
RSV Engineering, Inc.

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE ASSESSMENT AND
BASELINE GROUNDWATER QUALITY REPORT
General Steel Drum Facility
4500 South Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina, 282091

October 20, 2010

Prepared For

CONTAINER MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC
8435 NE KILLINGSWORTH
PORTLAND, OREGON, 97720

Prepared By:

31960 SW Charbonneau Drive, Suite 101
Wilsonville, Oregon 97070
TELEPHONE: [phone] FACSIMILE: [phone]

PROJECT NO. 0010736.00 PHASE 002

Phase II ESA and Baseline Groundwater Assessment Page i of ii
4500 South Boulevard October 20, 2010
Charlotte, North Carolina Project No. 0010736.00 Phase 002
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS....................................................................................................1
2. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................3
3. BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................3
3.1 Location and Description ................................................................................................3
3.2 Geology and Hydrogeology.............................................................................................3
3.2.1 Geology ...................................................................................................................3
3.2.2 Hydrogeology...........................................................................................................4
3.3 Phase I ESA ...................................................................................................................4
4. FIELD ACTIVITIES................................................................................................................5
4.1 Investigative Soil and Groundwater Locations and Rationale..........................................6
4.1.1 Former Diesel Fuel UST and Compressor Areas .....................................................6
4.1.2 Baseline Groundwater Investigation Locations and Rationale ..................................6
4.2 Investigative Methods .....................................................................................................7
4.2.1 Soil Sampling ...........................................................................................................7
4.2.2 Groundwater Sampling.............................................................................................7
4.3 Soil Field Screening ........................................................................................................8
4.4 Push Probe Abandonment..............................................................................................8
4.5 Decontamination Procedures..........................................................................................8
4.6 Investigative Derived Waste............................................................................................8
5. ANALYTICAL TESTING........................................................................................................8
6. INVESTIGATIVE RESULTS..................................................................................................9
6.1 Subsurface Conditions....................................................................................................9
6.2 Screening Reference Levels...........................................................................................9
6.2.1 Soil...........................................................................................................................9
6.2.2 Groundwater ..........................................................................................................10
6.3 Soil Analytical Testing Results......................................................................................10
6.3.1 Former Diesel Fuel Tank Area Soil Testing Results ...............................................10
6.3.2 Compressor Area Soil Testing Results ...................................................................10
6.4 Groundwater Analytical Testing Results........................................................................10
6.4.1 Baseline Temporary Well Point Groundwater Testing Results................................10
6.4.2 Production Well Groundwater Testing Results .......................................................11
7. LIMITATIONS......................................................................................................................12
8. SIGNATURES.....................................................................................................................13
9. GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS.....................................................................................14

Phase II ESA and Baseline Groundwater Assessment Page ii of ii
4500 South Boulevard October 20, 2010
Charlotte, North Carolina Project No. 0010736.00 Phase 002
Table of Contents (continued)
TABLES
1 Summary of Soil Analytical Testing Results – Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
2 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Testing Results – Volatile Organic Compounds

FIGURES
1 Site Location
2 Site Map
3 Investigation Locations Map

APPENDICES
A RSV Standard Operating Procedures
B Field Push Probe Boring Logs
C Laboratory Reports and Chain of Custody Documentation - Soil
D Laboratory Reports and Chain of Custody Documentation - Groundwater

Phase II ESA and Baseline Groundwater Assessment Page 1 of 14
4500 South Boulevard October 20, 2010
Charlotte, North Carolina Project No. 0010736.00
1. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
In October 2010, RSV Engineering, Inc. (RSV) conducted Phase II Environmental Site
Assessment (ESA) and baseline groundwater evaluation activities at the approximate 5.73-acre
General Steel Drum property located at 4500 South Boulevard, Charlotte, North Carolina
(Figure 1). A summary of findings relating to the Phase II ESA and baseline groundwater
evaluation activities are presented below.
1. On October 6 and 7, 2010, nine push probe borings were installed at the site to
evaluate soil and groundwater quality. In particular, soil quality samples were
collected in vicinity of a previously-removed diesel fuel underground storage
tank (UST) and in the area of an on-site compressor room. In addition, shallow
groundwater quality samples were collected at selected locations across the
site to assess baseline conditions while a deeper-zone water sample was
collected from the combined contribution of two site production wells prior to
use within the facility process.
2. Soils encountered in push probe borings were composed entirely of silt and/or
clay soil at SB-1, SB-2, SB-3, TW-1, TW-2, TW-3, and TW-4 to the maximum
depth of investigation at 35 feet below ground surface (bgs). Silty soils were
also encountered at TW-5 and TW-6 but at shallower depths of between five to
16 feet bgs that were underlain by what appeared to be severely weathered
bedrock to the maximum depth of investigation at these locations of 25 feet
bgs. Groundwater was encountered in TW-2 through TW-6 at depths ranging
between 17 to 24 feet bgs; while groundwater was not encountered in shallow
soil borings SB-1, SB-2, and SB-3, or temporary well point boring TW-1 thought
to be caused by pumping from the nearby process water well.
3. Field screening of boring soil did not identify the presence of petroleum or
volatile contamination that could be identified by such methods.
4. Soil and groundwater results were screened against established State of North
Carolina standards. More specifically, soil analytical testing results were
screened to standards established within Title 15A Environment and Natural
Resources of the North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) Subchapter 2L
and applicable Department of the Environment and Natural Resource (DENR)
guideline documents; groundwater analytical testing results were compared to
Title 15A of the NCAC Subchapter 2L Section .200 – Classifications and
Groundwater Quality Standards. For the purpose of site screening evaluations,
groundwater was considered Class GA (Best Usage).

Phase II ESA and Baseline Groundwater Assessment Page 2 of 14
4500 South Boulevard October 20, 2010
Charlotte, North Carolina Project No. 0010736.00

5. Analytical testing of soil quality samples collected in proximity to the previously
removed diesel fuel tank did not detect gasoline, diesel, or oil-range total
petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) above laboratory method reporting limits
(MRLs). Laboratory MRLs were below established reference levels for
petroleum products analyzed. Based on the preceding, it does not appear
further investigations in vicinity of the removed diesel tank or compressor room
are warranted
6. Analytical testing of five shallow temporary well point baseline groundwater
samples detected various volatile organic compounds (VOCs) above laboratory
method detection limits (MDLs) at various locations. More specifically,
concentrations of acetone, chloroform, chloromethane, chlorobenzene,
tetrachloroethene (perc or PCE), and methylene chloride were detected. Of
those six compounds, only two, namely chloroform and PCE, exceeded their
established reference levels. Chloroform can be associated with the addition of
chlorinated compounds to drinking water (for disinfecting purposes) and may
be sourced from underground water lines or sewer lines, and as such, is not
thought to be of concern for the site. The presence of PCE above reference
level is of concern, however, the source is not known.
7. Analytical testing of the water sample collected from the combined effluent from
the production wells at the site detected six VOCs including chlorobenzene,
1,4-dichlorobenzene, 1,2-dichloropropane, 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA or
ethylene dichloride [EDC]), cis-1,2-dichloroethene (DCE), and trichloroethene
(TCE). It is not possible to determine if these compounds are in one or both
production wells, nor is it possible to determine their true concentration since
the water sample was collected from the combined effluent down-stream of
well pumps and pressure systems. In addition, it is not known what hydraulic
influence these production wells exert on regional groundwater flow. Although
the sources of groundwater impact detected are not known, the concentrations
detected at the location sampled are below established reference levels.

Phase II ESA and Baseline Groundwater Assessment Page 3 of 14
4500 South Boulevard October 20, 2010
Charlotte, North Carolina Project No. 0010736.00
2. INTRODUCTION
Container Management Services, LLC (CMS) retained RSV Engineering, Inc. (RSV) to
conduct Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and baseline groundwater
evaluation activities at the approximate 5.73-acre General Steel Drum property located
at 4500 South Boulevard, Charlotte, North Carolina (Figure 1). The Phase II ESA and
baseline groundwater investigation activities were conducted to assess soil and
groundwater quality in selected areas of the subject property.
3. BACKGROUND
3.1 Location and Description
The site is located at 4500 South Boulevard in Charlotte, North Carolina (herein the
Site) that is currently operated by General Steel Drum for the purpose of steel drum
manufacture. The Site is at an elevation of approximately 730 feet mean sea level
(msl) (Figure 1) and zoned for industrial use. Four buildings are located on the property
(Figure 2) including:
• Building 1 - an approximate 61,000 square foot warehouse built in 1958, currently
used for steel drum production,
• Building 2 - a concrete block building that is approximately 2500 square feet, built in
1959, and currently used as a machine maintenance shop,
• Building 3 - an approximately 3000 square foot office building added in approximately
1983, and
• Building 4 – a concrete block paint storage structure located southwest of the main
facility (Building 1). In addition, a covered hazardous waste storage
area (fenced in canopy) is located southwest of Building 4.
3.2 Geology and Hydrogeology
3.2.1 Geology
According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Soil Conservation Service, the
native soils in the vicinity of the Subject Property are classified as Cecil Sandy
Clay Loam, with moderate infiltration rates that are well drained. The North
Carolina Geological Survey’s Geologic Map of North Carolina (1998) indicates that
bedrock in the vicinity of the subject property is generally composed of Paleozoic
aged mafic intrusive and metamorphosed mafic intrusive rocks while the United
States Geological Survey (USGS) describes surficial materials in the area as
having been formed by the partial chemical dissolution and physical disintegration

Phase II ESA and Baseline Groundwater Assessment Page 4 of 14
4500 South Boulevard October 20, 2010
Charlotte, North Carolina Project No. 0010736.00
of bedrock that includes fine to coarse-grained poorly sorted rocks1. Near-surface
soils encountered during site investigations were principally fine-grained silts and/or
clays to the maximum depth of investigation at 35 feet bgs; however, some coarse-
grained soils (gravels and sands) were encountered at several locations (see Section
6.1 for details).
3.2.2 Hydrogeology
The Site is situated on an area that is locally elevated surrounded by several
unnamed tributaries, the closest being a tributary to Little Hope Creek located
approximately 800 feet north of the Site. Based on local topography and Site’s
proximity to surface waters, unconfined local shallow groundwater would likely flow
to the north towards the nearby unnamed tributary stream; however, pumping from
two site production wells may significantly effect groundwater flow, the extent of
which is not known. Uppermost groundwater was encountered in temporary well
point push probe borings during the site investigations at depths between 17 and
24 feet bgs (Section 7.1).
3.3 Phase I ESA
In September 2010 RSV prepared a Phase I ESA2 for the subject property. The Phase
I ESA identified Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs), as defined by the
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Practice E1527-05. The RECs
identified are summarized as follows:
On-site REC #1: Staining of the asphalt near the southwest corner of Building
1 was observed near a large compressor. Mr. Lynn indicated that a housing
containing an oil-water separator had cracked in this area, which resulted in the
release of oil to the ground surface.
Recommendation: A baseline soil assessment should be conducted in
proximity to the compressor to assess soil quality.
Historic REC #1: A diesel fuel underground storage tank was located at the
southwest corner of Building 1 for several months in approximately 1985/1986. The
tank was subsequently removed and purported to be in good condition. However, no
documentation related to the tank, its removal, or surrounding soil quality were
provided by General Steel Drum.

1 U.S. Geological Survey (2004). Materials in the Conterminous United States. 2004
2 RSV Engineering, Inc. (2010). Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, General Steel Drum Facility, 4500
South Boulevard, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209. September 24, 2010.

Phase II ESA and Baseline Groundwater Assessment Page 5 of 14
4500 South Boulevard October 20, 2010
Charlotte, North Carolina Project No. 0010736.00
Recommendation: A baseline soil assessment should be conducted in
proximity to the former tank to assess soil quality.
Non-REC #1: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (principally toluene and methyl-ethyl
ketone) are used in the current site process and the historic site uses are not well
documented. In addition, at sites with soil and groundwater contamination, it is common
for groundwater cleanup to cost orders of magnitude greater than soil cleanup.
Recommendation: It would be prudent for the Client to consider conducting a
baseline groundwater investigation at the site.
Based on the preceding, CMS retained RSV to conduct a Phase II ESA with respect to the
above-referenced On-Site and Historic RECs as well as conduct a baseline groundwater
evaluation for the above-referenced site the results of which are the subject of the report herein.
4. FIELD ACTIVITIES
Phase II ESA and baseline groundwater investigative field activities were conducted on October
6 and 7, 2010. A truck-mounted push probe boring rig was used for the collection of subsurface
soil and groundwater samples. McCall Brothers, Inc. of Charlotte, North Carolina, a driller
licensed to conduct such activities, was the contract driller for this project. All push probe
borings were installed and abandoned in accordance with the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality Rules (NCAC 15A 2C.0100 Well Construction Standards for Water Supply and Certain
Other Wells).
Soil and baseline groundwater samples were collected consistent with North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resource (DENR) guidelines3,4,5,6 and in general
accordance with RSV Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) that provide the framework from
which the field activities for this project were completed. All applicable RSV SOPs are included
in Appendix A and field activities are briefly summarized below.

3 Department of Environment and Natural Resources (2008a). Guidelines for Sampling. December 1, 2008. 4 Department of Environment and Natural Resources (2008b). Guidelines for Assessment and Corrective Action for
UST Releases. December 1, 2008. 5 Department of Environment and Natural Resources (2008c). Guidelines for Site Checks, Tank Closure, and Initial
Response and Abatement for UST Releases. December 1, 2008. 6 Department of Environment and Natural Resources (2007). UST Section Guidelines for the Investigation and
Remediation of Contamination from Non-UST Petroleum Releases. July 1, 2007.

Phase II ESA and Baseline Groundwater Assessment Page 6 of 14
4500 South Boulevard October 20, 2010
Charlotte, North Carolina Project No. 0010736.00

4.1 Investigative Soil and Groundwater Locations and Rationale
In total, nine investigative borings (TW-1 through TW-6 and SB-1, SB-2, and SB-3)
were installed at the site for the purpose of assessing soil and baseline groundwater
quality. The boring locations and rationale are briefly described in the following
section.
4.1.1 Former Diesel Fuel UST and Compressor Areas
Three push probe borings (SB-1, SB-2, and SB-3) were placed in vicinity to the
previously-removed diesel fuel tank and existing compressor room located in
proximity to southwestern exterior of the main facility structure (Building 1) to
evaluate shallow soil quality. More specifically, SB-1 and SB-2 were placed in
vicinity of oil-stained asphalt adjacent to the compressor room while SB-3 was
placed in proximity to the previously-removed diesel tank location.
4.1.2 Baseline Groundwater Investigation Locations and Rationale
Screening-level groundwater samples were collected from five of six push probe
borings (namely TW-2 through TW-6) for the purpose of assessing baseline
groundwater conditions across the site. Although attempts were made to collect a
water sample from TW-1, groundwater was not encountered to a depth of 35 feet
bgs that was thought to be the result of dewatering caused from long-term
pumping at the nearby eastern facility production well. Of the temporary well
points where groundwater was encountered and sampled, various locations
served a dual purpose in that they were also focused in areas of interest as
follows:
Push Probe
Number
Purpose
TW-2 Baseline groundwater quality; near interior parts lining
booths and loading dock
TW-3 Baseline groundwater quality; near former diesel fuel
UST and compressor room
TW-4 Baseline groundwater quality; near hazardous waste
storage area and paint/oil storage areas
TW-5 Baseline groundwater quality; near maintenance shop
TW-6 Baseline groundwater quality; near spray booth and
exterior paint booths

Phase II ESA and Baseline Groundwater Assessment Page 7 of 14
4500 South Boulevard October 20, 2010
Charlotte, North Carolina Project No. 0010736.00
In addition to the preceding, efforts were made to collect water samples from each
of the two production wells at the Site. However, based on the configuration of the
production well system, there was no access for sampling individual well-heads,
and as such, one water sample was collected from the most up-stream access
point where waters from these wells are combined prior to use in the General Steel
Drum process. Although a log for either of the site production wells was not
available at the facility, or from the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (DENR) Division of Water, the production wells located west
and east of Building 1 were suggested by General Steel Drum personnel to be on
the order of 525 and 130 feet deep respectively (General Steel Drum maintenance
to Ms. Paula Richardson, personal communication) (Figure 3).
4.2 Investigative Methods
A truck-mounted push probe drilling rig was used to collect subsurface soil and ground
water samples from selected areas at the Site described in detail below. McCall
Brothers Inc., of Charlotte, North Carolina, was the licensed driller for this project.
4.2.1 Soil Sampling
A Macro Core sampler was utilized for the collection of soil samples that was
advanced through subsurface soils at approximate 5-foot intervals. Upon removal
from the ground, the acetate sleeve was removed, and cored soil exposed. A soil
sample was then collected into a laboratory-provided sample jar with a pair of new
nitrile gloves. Appropriate state preservation methods were utilized consistent with
the requested laboratory analysis (Section 5.0).
4.2.2 Groundwater Sampling
Screening level groundwater samples were collected from TW-2, TW-3, TW-4,
TW-5, and TW-6 (Figure 3) from the uppermost groundwater beneath the site
utilizing a 1-inch diameter temporary well point that was advanced to between five
to ten feet below the water table. Upon reaching the desired sampling depth,
approximately 1 liter of water was purged prior to sampling. Groundwater samples
were then collected into laboratory-provided 40-mililiter (ml) sampling volatile
organic analysis (VOA) vials.
The configuration of individual production well-heads precluded groundwater
sample collection on an individual basis. As such, one water sample was collected
from an access point where waters from these wells are combined prior to use in
the General Steel Drum process. Production well sampling was conducted as
consistent as possible with applicable state guidance (NC DENR 2008b) and RSV
SOPs (Appendix A).

Phase II ESA and Baseline Groundwater Assessment Page 8 of 14
4500 South Boulevard October 20, 2010
Charlotte, North Carolina Project No. 0010736.00
4.3 Soil Field Screening
Field screening methods were employed in each of the push probe borings at selected
intervals to assess for contaminants of interest that could be identified by such
methods. Field screening methods included visual, odor, and vapor headspace. Field
screening did not identify the presence of petroleum or volatile contamination that
could be identified by such methods.
4.4 Push Probe Abandonment
Upon completion, and removal of drilling equipment form the borehole, each boring
was abandoned in accordance with North Carolina Division of Water Quality Rules
(NCAC 15A 2C.0100 Well Construction Standards for Water Supply and Certain Other
Wells) by filling with bentonite chips to land surface. Areas of asphalt pavement were
restored to match using asphalt patch.
4.5 Decontamination Procedures
All push probe drilling equipment was decontaminated prior to, and between, each
probed location to prevent cross-contamination.
4.6 Investigative Derived Waste
Investigative-Derived Waste (IDW) was managed consistent with North Carolina DENR
guidance (DENR 2008b). Since evidence of soil contamination was not observed in
any of the drill cuttings, soil wastes were placed at each respective boring location or in
the closest landscape area.
Since evidence of contamination was not observed in soil cuttings or field screening
indicators on boring purge or equipment decontamination water (sheen), and water
quality was thought to be representative of uppermost shallow groundwater, all
decontamination water was placed on vegetated land surface in proximity to each
respective boring.
5. ANALYTICAL TESTING
The soil samples were shipped with chain-of-custody documentation in a chilled coolers to Pace
Analytical Laboratory, in Charlotte North Carolina, for analytical testing on an expedited five-day
turnaround basis.
Selected soil samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline range
organics (GRO) by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8015M and EPA 5035
preparation, for diesel-range organics (DRO) by EPA Method 8015M with an EPA 3545 and
3550 preparation, and oil-range hydrocarbons by an EPA Method 9071 modified.

Phase II ESA and Baseline Groundwater Assessment Page 9 of 14
4500 South Boulevard October 20, 2010
Charlotte, North Carolina Project No. 0010736.00
Selected groundwater samples were analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260B.
The laboratory reports and chain-of-custody documentation for the soil and groundwater
analytical testing are in Appendices C and D respectively. Summaries of soil and groundwater
sample analytical testing results are presented on Tables 1 and 2.
6. INVESTIGATIVE RESULTS
6.1 Subsurface Conditions
Soils encountered in push probe borings, beneath asphalt-paved surfaces where
applicable, were composed entirely of silt soil at B-1, B-2, B-3, TW-1, TW-2, and TW-3,
to the maximum depth of investigation at 35 feet below ground surface (bgs) (TW-1),
while TW-4, the most-western location, consisted entirely of clay soil to a depth of 25
feet bgs. Silty soils were also encountered at TW-5 and TW-6 but at shallower depths
of between five to 16 feet bgs that were underlain by what appeared to be severely
weathered bedrock to the maximum depth of investigation at these locations of 25 feet
bgs. Groundwater was encountered in TW-2 through TW-6 at depths ranging between
17 to 24 feet bgs; while groundwater was not encountered in shallow soil borings SB-1,
SB-2, and SB-3, or temporary well point boring TW-1. The absence of water in TW-1
is thought to have been caused by pumping from a nearby process water well.
6.2 Screening Reference Levels
6.2.1 Soil
Soil analytical testing results was conducted in accordance with Title 15A
Environment and Natural Resources of the North Carolina Administrative Code
(NCAC) Subchapter 2L and applicable DENR guideline documents (DENR 2007
and 2008c). More specifically, soil analysis in vicinity of the former diesel fuel tank
was compared to a “site check” screening-reference level of 10 milligrams per
kilogram (mg/kg) (DENR 2008c). Soil analysis in vicinity of the compressor room
was compared to cleanup requirements for non-UST contaminated soil for low
boiling point hydrocarbons (gasoline), medium to high boiling point hydrocarbons
(diesel fuel), and oils and greases of 10 mg/kg, 40 mg/kg, and 250 mg/kg
respectively (DENR 2007). According to DENR, the non-UST reference levels are
currently being updated to a 10 mg/kg threshold for all hydrocarbon ranges (Ms.
Linda Smith DENR UST Section to Mr. Guy Tanz RSV, October 7, 2010 telephone
communication).

Phase II ESA and Baseline Groundwater Assessment Page 10 of 14
4500 South Boulevard October 20, 2010
Charlotte, North Carolina Project No. 0010736.00
6.2.2 Groundwater
Groundwater analytical testing results were compared to Title 15A Environment
and Natural Resources of the NCAC Subchapter 2L Section .200 – Classifications
and Groundwater Quality Standards. For the purpose of site screening evaluation,
site groundwater was considered Class GA (Best Usage).
6.3 Soil Analytical Testing Results
The results of Phase II site investigations are discussed by area in the following
sections. Tables summarizing laboratory analytical results are on Table 1 and
investigative locations are depicted on Figure 3.
6.3.1 Former Diesel Fuel Tank Area Soil Testing Results
Analytical testing of soil samples collected from push probe boring B-3 installed in
vicinity of the former tank pit did not detect total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as
gasoline-range organics (GRO), diesel-range organics (DRO), or residual range
(oil) organics (RRO) (Table 1). In addition, evidence of petroleum hydrocarbons
was not identified by field screening methods in nearby temporary well point boring
TW-3. Accordingly, it does not appear that further Phase II investigation of soil in
proximity to the former diesel fuel tank area is warranted.
6.3.2 Compressor Area Soil Testing Results
Analytical testing of soil samples collected from two push probe borings (B-1 and
B-2) installed in vicinity of the compressor room did not detect total petroleum
hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline-range organics (GRO), diesel-range organics
(DRO), or residual range (oil) organics (RRO) (Table 1). Accordingly, it does not
appear that further Phase II investigation of soil in proximity to the compressor
room is warranted.
6.4 Groundwater Analytical Testing Results
The results of baseline groundwater and production well sampling are discussed
below. Tables summarizing laboratory analytical results are on Table 2 and
investigative locations are depicted on Figure 3.
6.4.1 Baseline Temporary Well Point Groundwater Testing Results
Analytical testing of five shallow baseline groundwater samples detected various
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) above laboratory method detection limits
(MDLs) at different locations (Table 2). More specifically, concentrations of
acetone, chloroform, chloromethane, chlorobenzene, tetrachloroethene (perc or
PCE), and methylene chloride were detected. Acetone and methylene chloride

Phase II ESA and Baseline Groundwater Assessment Page 11 of 14
4500 South Boulevard October 20, 2010
Charlotte, North Carolina Project No. 0010736.00
are commonly used in analytical laboratories and their presence in the trip blank
suggest these compounds are not of concern for the site. Of the six compounds
detected, only two, chloroform and PCE at concentrations of 0.82 (estimated) and
1.7 ug/l, exceed their established reference levels of 0.7 ug/l for Class GA
groundwater. Chloroform can be associated with the addition of chlorinated
compounds to drinking water (for disinfecting purposes) and may be sourced from
underground water lines or sewer lines, and as such, is not thought to be of
concern for the site. PCE is a chlorinated solvent that is sometimes used by
industrial facilities as a degreasing compound and is commonly used in dry
cleaning activities. The presence of PCE above reference level is of concern.
Although the location of TW-106 where the PCE exceedence was detected is in
proximity to facility process spray and paint booths, its source is not known.
6.4.2 Production Well Groundwater Testing Results
Groundwater analysis of the sample from the combined effluent from the
production wells at the site detected six VOCs including chlorobenzene, 1,4-
dichlorobenzene, 1,2-dichloropropane, 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA or ethylene
dichloride [EDC]), cis-1,2-dichloroethene (DCE), and trichloroethene (TCE). It is
not possible to determine if these compounds are in one or both production wells,
nor is it possible to determine their true concentration since the water sample was
collected down-stream of well pumps and pressure systems. It is also not known
what kind of hydraulic influence these production wells exert on regional
groundwater flow. Lastly, the latter two compounds detected, namely cis-1,2-DCE
and TCE, are typical daughter products of PCE; however, it is not possible to
determine if they are related to the PCE detected in TW-106.
The concentrations of all VOCs detected in the combined production water well
effluent at the location sampled are below their established reference levels for
Class GA groundwater.

Phase II ESA and Baseline Groundwater Assessment Page 12 of 14
4500 South Boulevard October 20, 2010
Charlotte, North Carolina Project No. 0010736.00
7. LIMITATIONS
The scope of Phase II investigation herein was prepared and implemented using the degree of care and
skill ordinarily exercised by, and consistent with, the standards competent environmental science
professionals would apply in evaluation of a similar site in vicinity of the subject property. In performing
such a study, it is understood that a balance must be struck between reasonable inquiry into the Site
conditions and cost of an exhaustive evaluation. No environmental site assessment can wholly eliminate
uncertainty regarding potential environmental conditions in connection with a property since the
exploration and/or testing conducted only determine quality of surface and/or subsurface conditions at
those points sampled, and as such, are not representative of the property as a whole.
Certain information utilized by RSV Engineering, Inc. in this report/assessment has been obtained,
reviewed, and evaluated from various sources believed to be reliable, including property owners,
operators, state and federal agencies, or other knowledgeable persons. Although RSV Engineering, Inc’s
conclusions, opinions, and recommendations are based in part on such information, RSV Engineering,
Inc.’s services did not include the verification of its accuracy or authenticity. Should such information
prove to be inaccurate or unreliable, RSV Engineering, Inc. reserves the right to amend or revise its
conclusions, opinions, and/or recommendations.
Without limitation, RSV Engineering does not provide guarantee or certification that the subject site is free
of contamination, nor where detected, is representative of the property as a whole. In addition, we are
not responsible for any changes in environmental standards, practices, or regulations subsequent to
performance of these services. The document herein is a work of opinion and therefore we do not offer
any warranty regarding advice, conclusions, or recommendations. In addition, advice, opinions, and
recommendations should not be used as a substitute to that of legal counsel. (11/30/07)

Phase II ESA and Baseline Groundwater Assessment Page 13 of 14
4500 South Boulevard October 20, 2010
Charlotte, North Carolina Project No. 0010736.00

8. SIGNATURES

We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to Container Management Services, LLC

Sincerely,

RSV Engineering Inc.

Guy H. Tanz, R.G. (OR) L.G. (WA)
Principal Geologist
RSV Engineering, Inc.

Phase II ESA and Baseline Groundwater Assessment Page 14 of 14
4500 South Boulevard October 20, 2010
Charlotte, North Carolina Project No. 0010736.00
9. GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
bgs below ground surface
COC contaminant of concern
DCA dichloroethane
DCE dichloroethene
DENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
EDR Environmental Data Resources
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
ESA environmental site assessment
HVOC halogenated volatile organic compound
mg/kg milligrams per kilogram
MCL maximum contaminant limit
MRL method reporting limit
MSL mean sea level
NCAC North Carolina Administrative Code
PCE tetrachloroethene
PAH polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon
REC Recognized Environmental Condition
RSV RSV Engineering, Inc.
TCA trichloroethane
TCE trichloroethene
USGS United States Geological Survey
UST underground storage tank
VOC volatile organic compounds

Tables

TABLE 1 - Summary of Soil Analytical Testing - Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Sample Sample Sample Sample Laboratory Analytical Testing Results (mg/kg)
Description Number
1 Date Depth EPA Method
5035+8015M 3545/3550+8015M 9071B Modified
Low Boiling Point Moderate to High
Boiling Point Heavy Fuels
(feet bgs)(gasolines)(flags)(diesel fuels)(flags)(oils)(flags)
Reference Levels:UST Reference Levels1 --> 10. 10. 10.
Non-UST Reference Levels2,3 -->10. 40. 240.
Compressor room SB-201 7-Oct-10 4 - 5 6.7 U 6.8 U 96.3 U
Compressor room SB-202 7-Oct-10 4 - 5 7.4 U 6.1 U 84.6 U
Former diesel tank area SB-203 7-Oct-10 7 - 8 7. U 6.5 U -
Note: EPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
mg/kg = miligrams per kilogram
U = not detected above laboratory reporting limit indicated.
UST = underground storage tank
1 = Reference Level based on Department of Environment and Natural Resources Guidelines for Site Checks, Tank Closure,
and Initial Response and Abatement for UST Releases, December 1, 2008.
2 = Reference Level based on Department of Environment and Natural Resources UST Section Guidelines for the Investigation and
Remediation of Contamination from Non-UST Petroleum Releases, July 1, 2007.
3 = Diesel and oil standards are currently in review for being lowered to 10 mg/kg
(Ms. Linda Smith, DENR to Mr. Guy Tanz, RSV, 10/07/10 telephone communication)
Bold = detected concentration exceeds reference Level
___________________________________
Summary of Soil Analytical Testing - TPH
4500 South Boulevard, Charlotte, NC
File: Table 1 NC TPH in Soil.xls, Soil Summary Table
___________________________________
Page 1 of 1
Updated: 10/15/10 GHT
TABLE 2Summary of Groundwater Sampling Analytical Testing - Volatile Organic Compounds by Laborator
y

M
e
t
h
o
d

D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

L
i
m
i
t
LocationSampleDate
A
n
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l

R
e
s
u
l
t
s

i
n

u
g
/
l
Number
V
O
C
s

b
y

E
P
A

M
e
t
h
o
d

8
2
6
0
b
AcetoneChloroformChloromethaneChlorobenzene1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloropropane
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes
Naphthalene
MEK
1,1,1-TCA
1,2-DCA (EDC)
1,1-DCA
Vinyl Chloride
trans-1,2-DCE
cis-1,2-DCE
TCE
PCE
Methylene Chloride
Other VOCs
Reference Levels1:Class GA Standard --> 6,000. 0.7 3. 50. 6.
0
.
6

1
.

6
0
0
.

6
0
0
.

5
0
0
.

6
.

4
,
0
0
0
.

2
0
0
.

0
.
4

6
.

0
.
0
3

1
0
0
.

7
0
.

3
.

0
.
7

5
.

v
a
r
i
e
s

Loading dock area TW-102 7-Oct-10 2.2 U 0.14 U 0.11 U 0.23 U 0.3
3

U

0
.
2
7

U

0
.
2
5

U

0
.
2
6

U

0
.
3

U

0
.
6
6

U

0
.
2
4

U

0
.
9
6

U

0
.
4
8

U

0
.
1
2

U

0
.
3
2

U

0
.
6
2

U

0
.
4
9

U

0
.
1
9

U

0
.
4
7

U

0
.
4
6
U

0
.
9
7
U

U
Former diesel tank area TW-103 7-Oct-10 2.9 J0.82J 0.11 U 0.23 U 0.3
3

U

0
.
2
7

U

0
.
2
5

U

0
.
2
6

U

0
.
3

U

0
.
6
6

U

0
.
2
4

U

0
.
9
6

U

0
.
4
8

U

0
.
1
2

U

0
.
3
2

U

0
.
6
2

U

0
.
4
9

U

0
.
1
9

U

0
.
4
7

U

0
.
4
6

U

0
.
9
7

U

U
Haz-waste storage area TW-104 6-Oct-10 3.4 J 0.14 U 0.16 J 0.23 U 0.3
3

U

0
.
2
7

U

0
.
2
5

U

0
.
2
6

U

0
.
3

U

0
.
6
6

U

0
.
2
4

U

0
.
9
6

U

0
.
4
8

U

0
.
1
2

U

0
.
3
2

U

0
.
6
2

U

0
.
4
9

U

0
.
1
9

U

0
.
4
7

U

0
.
4
6

U

0
.
9
7

U

U
Maintenance area TW-105 7-Oct-10 2.4 J 0.14 U 0.27 J 0.3 J 0.3
3

U

0
.
2
7

U

0
.
2
5

U

0
.
2
6

U

0
.
3

U

0
.
6
6

U

0
.
2
4

U

0
.
9
6

U

0
.
4
8

U

0
.
1
2

U

0
.
3
2

U

0
.
6
2

U

0
.
4
9

U

0
.
1
9

U

0
.
4
7

U

0
.
4
6

U
0
.
9
7

U

U
Spray/paint booth areas TW-106 7-Oct-10 2.8 J 0.14 U 0.11 U 0.23 U 0.3
3

U

0
.
2
7

U

0
.
2
5

U

0
.
2
6

U

0
.
3

U

0
.
6
6

U

0
.
2
4

U

0
.
9
6

U

0
.
4
8

U

0
.
1
2

U

0
.
3
2

U

0
.
6
2

U

0
.
4
9

U

0
.
1
9

U

0
.
4
7

U
1
.
7
2
.
2

U
Production Well PWW-001 7-Oct-10 2.2 U 0.14 U 0.11 U 0.75 J 0.6
J

0
.
4
4

J

0
.
2
5

U

0
.
2
6

U

0
.
3

U

0
.
6
6

U

0
.
2
4

U

0
.
9
6

U

0
.
4
8

U

0
.
1
7

J

0
.
3
2

U

0
.
6
2

U

0
.
4
9

U

0
.
4
7

J

0
.
8

J

0
.
4
6

U

0
.
9
7

U

U
Trip blank - 7-Oct-10 5. J 0.14 U 0.11 U 0.23 U 0.3
3

U

0
.
2
7

U

0
.
2
5

U

0
.
2
6

U

0
.
3

U

0
.
6
6

U

0
.
2
4

U

0
.
9
6

U

0
.
4
8

U

0
.
1
2

U

0
.
3
2

U

0
.
6
2

U

0
.
4
9

U

0
.
1
9

U

0
.
4
7

U

0
.
4
6

U

0
.
9
9

J

U
Note:DCA = dichloroethaneMRL =

m
e
t
h
o
d

r
e
p
o
r
t
i
n
g

l
i
m
i
t
DCE = dichloroethene MEK =

m
e
t
h
y
l

e
t
h
y
l

k
e
t
o
n
e

(
2
-
b
u
t
a
n
o
n
e
)
EDB = ethylene dibromide (1,2-dibromoethane)PCE =

t
e
t
r
a
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
e
n
e
EDC = ethylene dichloride (1,2-DCA )TCA =
1
,
1
,
1
-
t
r
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
a
n
e
EPA = U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyTCE =

t
r
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
e
n
e
J = estimated concentration above MDL and below MRLU = no
t

d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d

a
b
o
v
e

l
a
b
o
r
a
t
o
r
y

r
e
p
o
r
t
i
n
g

l
i
m
i
t

i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
MEK = methyl ethyl ketone (2-butanone)ug/l =
m
i
c
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

p
e
r

l
i
t
e
r
MDL = method detection limit1 = Reference Level based on (15A NCAC 02L .200 - Classifications and Groundwater Qua
l
i
t
y

S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s

f
o
r

C
l
a
s
s

G
A

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

U
s
a
g
e
)
Bold = detected concentration exceeds Class GA groundwater usage reference Level

=

c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d
___________________________________Summary of Groundwater Analytical Testing - VOCs4500 South Boulevard, Charlotte, NCFile: Table 2 NC GW VOCs.xls, MDL Data
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
P
a
g
e

1

o
f

1
U
p
d
a
t
e
d
:

1
0
/
1
8
/
1
0

G
H
T

Figures

N

N

Appendices

Appendix A

RSV Standard Operating Procedures

SOP ENV-10 Page 1 of 5
Field Documentation Procedures June 2009
FIELD DOCUMENTATION
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

SOP ENV-10

Updated June 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................1
2. FIELD DOCUMENTATION....................................................................................................1
2.1 Daily Logs.......................................................................................................................1
2.2 Field Logs .......................................................................................................................3
2.2.1 Drilled, Direct Push, or Hand Auger Borings.............................................................3
2.2.2 Temporary Well-Point Installation.............................................................................4
2.2.3 Monitoring Well Installation ......................................................................................4
2.2.4 Test Pits...................................................................................................................4
2.2.5 Surface or Near-Surface Soil Penetration and Sampling..........................................5
2.3 Sample Quality Control ...................................................................................................5

1. INTRODUCTION
This SOP presents the methods and procedures for documentation of activities while in the
field. The SOP is intended to provide a framework that describes the minimum documentation
field personnel should gather while in the field, however, additional documentation may be
required based on site specific circumstances. In addition, field personnel should discuss
specific project objectives and requirements with the RSV project manager prior to conducting
field operations.
2. FIELD DOCUMENTATION
In general, field documentation should include, but is not limited to, properly utilizing daily logs
and field logs as described in detail below.
2.1 Daily Logs
Field team members will keep a daily record of project activities that document their
observations of significant events, findings, and measurements in a field log. All field

SOP ENV-10 Page 2 of 5
Field Documentation Procedures June 2009

activities will be recorded on RSV field forms that will be considered the main source of
field documentation for all activities including samples collected. The minimum
required documentation includes, but is not limited to, the following:
1 Project name,
2 Field personnel,
3 Project personnel and/or site visitors,
4 Health and safety tailgate meetings,
5 Weather conditions,
6 Scale maps and/or drawings,
7 Photographs,
8 Date, time, media, number of containers filled and type, and locations of
samples collected,
9 Sample types, methods of collection and equipment used, field instruments
used and calibration,
10 Sample bottles, preservation, and handling,
11 Unique sample identification numbers,
12 Conferences associated with field sampling activities,
13 General chronology of daily events,
14 Sizes of underground storage tanks and associated piping, locations, depths,
orientation, material types, and conditions,
15 Release reporting,
16 Number and locations of borings, wells, and test pits installed,
17 Site restoration,
18 Decontamination procedures,
19 Investigative-derived waste management,
20 Subsurface conditions encountered including soil descriptions and depths,
presence or absence and depth of groundwater, and environmental
observations and/or field screening results,
21 Field observations including sampling complications, and any deviations from
Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs), Sampling Analysis Plans, or project
work plans,

SOP ENV-10 Page 3 of 5
Field Documentation Procedures June 2009

Field notes will be maintained on a new page for each day. In general, sufficient
information must be recorded during all field activities such that activities can be
reconstructed without relying on the memory of the field personnel.
Field notes will be maintained on appropriate media such that they resist adverse field
conditions. All pages will be dated and numbered consecutively. All pages will
remain intact, and maintained in a central location within the project file. Notes will be
taken in indelible, waterproof blue or black ink. Errors will be corrected by crossing out
with a single line, dating, and initialing.
2.2 Field Logs
RSV will document certain kinds of activities on a designated field log, such as drilled,
direct-push, or hand auger borings and sampling, temporary well point installation and
sampling, monitoring well installation, test pit installation and sampling, or involved
surface or near-surface soil penetration and sampling activities.
At a minimum the following information will be recorded for each of these referenced
logs:
2.2.1 Drilled, Direct Push, or Hand Auger Borings
1 Project number,
2 Project name,
3 Project address,
4 RSV logger,
5 Boring start and end date and time,
6 Contractor name and equipment,
7 Sampling methods,
8 Abandonment materials,
9 Groundwater depth of occurrence,
10 Soil types encountered, USCS description, and depth (in accordance with
SOPs ENV-140 and ENV-150),
11 Sample numbers and time,
12 Field screening results (in accordance with SOP ENV ENV-130),
13 Recovery and sample core interval,
14 Depth of investigation, and

SOP ENV-10 Page 4 of 5
Field Documentation Procedures June 2009

15 Global positioning coordinate.
2.2.2 Temporary Well-Point Installation
All of 1 through 15 under Drilled or Direct Push Borings above, including:
16 Temporary well point screen diameter, slot-size and placement,
17 Depth and zone of temporary sand pack, if any,
18 Groundwater sampling data logged on the appropriate RSV temporary well
point and monitoring well sampling form, including but not limited to: purge and
sampling equipment used, volume of water purged, field parameter
measurements, and samples collected.
2.2.3 Monitoring Well Installation
All of 1 through 15 under Drilled, Direct Push, or Hand Auger Borings above,
including:
16 Well construction materials, dimensions, length of screen, rat-hole length, and
screen slot size,
17 Sand pack size and depths,
18 Surface seal type and configuration,
19 Well completion type,
20 Well development (setting sand pack).
2.2.4 Test Pits
1 Project number,
2 Project name,
3 Date
4 Project address,
5 RSV logger,
6 Excavating company,
7 Excavating equipment,
8 Abandonment,
9 Groundwater depth of occurrence, if any,
10 Soil types encountered, USCS description, and depth (in accordance with SOP
ENV-140),

SOP ENV-10 Page 5 of 5
Field Documentation Procedures June 2009

11 Sample numbers and time,
12 Field screening results (in accordance with SOP ENV-130),
13 Depth of investigation.
2.2.5 Surface or Near-Surface Soil Penetration and Sampling
1 Project number,
2 Project name,
3 Date and time,
4 Project address,
5 RSV sampler,
6 Sampling methods,
7 Sample depth interval,
8 Soil type sampled including USCS description (in accordance with SOP ENV-
140),
9 Environmental observations and field screening (in accordance with SOP ENV-
130),
10 Global positioning coordinate.
Field logs will be maintained on a new page for each day. In general, sufficient
information must be recorded during all field activities such that activities can be
reconstructed without relying on the memory of the field personnel.
Field logs will be maintained on appropriate media such that they resist adverse field
conditions. All pages will be dated and numbered consecutively. All pages will
remain intact, and maintained in a central location within the project file. Logs will be
taken in indelible, waterproof blue or black ink. Errors will be corrected by crossing out
with a single line, dating, and initialing.
2.3 Sample Quality Control
All RSV personnel will identify and label samples in a consistent manner to ensure that
the life-cycle of all samples collected in the field can be reproduced. In addition, all
samples must provide information for the laboratory to conduct required analyses
properly. Bottle storage, preservation, and handling in the field will be documented on
field forms and logs. In all cases, samples collected must be managed in accordance
with SOP ENV-100 Sample Handling and Custody.

SOP ENV-100 Page 1 of 2
Sample Handling and Custody June 2009
SAMPLE HANDLING AND CUSTODY
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

SOP ENV-100

Updated June 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................1
2. SAMPLING HANDLING ........................................................................................................1
2.1.1 Sample Containers...................................................................................................1
2.1.2 Sample Labels .........................................................................................................2
3. SAMPLING CUSTODY .........................................................................................................2

1. INTRODUCTION
This standard operating procedure (SOP) describes the methods and procedures required for
maintaining custody of the samples throughout the sample collection and shipping process, and
provides specific procedures for sample shipping. The SOP herein was not designed to be
exhaustive for all decontamination programs that may be required during field operations. As
such, this SOP was developed only as a general guide that may require modification specific to
a given project’s requirements by the RSV project manager.
2. SAMPLE HANDLING
2.1 Sample Containers
Sample containers will be selected based on the laboratory parameter analyzed.
All containers will be provided by the analytical laboratory in a new pre-cleaned
condition, collected into the appropriate sampling container, and placed in a chilled
cooler for shipment to the analytical laboratory.

SOP ENV-100 Page 2 of 2
Sample Handling and Custody June 2009

2.2 Sample Identification and Labels
Each sampling container will be labeled prior to shipment to the analytical
laboratory. At a minimum, each sample will be labeled with the date, time, project
number, sampling personnel, company, and a unique sampling number. Individual
and unique sample numbers will be selected utilizing the project number followed
by a six digit reverse-date code followed by the sample number (i.e. 8047-080521-
001).
3. SAMPLE CUSTODY
Chain-of-custody will be maintained for all samples collected as part of a project.
Samples are considered to be in one’s custody if they are: (1) in the custodian’s
possession or view; (2) in a secured location (under lock) with restricted access; or
(3) in a container that is secured with an official seal(s) such that the sample
cannot be reached without breaking the seal(s).
Chain-of-custody procedures will be followed for all samples throughout the
collection, handling, and analytical testing that will be tracked on the chain-of-
custody form. Each sample will be documented on the chain-of-custody record in
indelible ink pen or type-written text. Any corrections necessary, will be made by
drawing a single line through the error, initialing, then writing in the correct
information and dating the change.
A chain-of-custody form will accompany each cooler of samples to the analytical
laboratory. Custody will be documented by the laboratory signing the chain-of-
custody acknowledging receipt and responsibility for the samples. The chain-of-
custody form will then be used by the analytical laboratory to track sample
handling and final disposition. The laboratory will return a signed chain-of-custody
at the time of custody transfer that will serve as a written record of sample transfer.

SOP ENV-120 Page 1 of 4
Equipment Decontamination Procedures June 2009
SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

SOP ENV-120

Updated June 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................1
2. DECONTAMINATION REAGENTS.......................................................................................2
3. DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES .................................................................................2
3.1 Low-Level Contamination Sites.......................................................................................2
3.2 Moderate-Level Contamination Sites ..............................................................................2
3.2.1 INORGANIC CONTAMINATED SAMPLING EQUIPMENT ......................................2
3.2.2 ORGANICALLY CONTAMINATED SAMPLING EQUIPMENT .................................3
4. DECONTAMINATION OF SAMPLING PUMPS.....................................................................3
5. DECONTAMINATION OF DRILLING EQUIPMENT..............................................................3
6. INVESTIGATIVE DERIVED WASTE (IDW)...........................................................................4

1. INTRODUCTION
This standard operating procedure (SOP) describes the methods and procedures that will be
used to decontaminate reusable soil and water sampling equipment that may come into contact
with environmentally contaminated media. The SOP herein was not designed to be exhaustive
for all decontamination programs that may be required during field operations. As such, this
SOP was developed only as a general guide that may require modification specific to a given
project’s requirements by the RSV project manager.
The decontamination program herein is designed to: 1) minimize the spread of contaminants
within a study area or from site to site, 2) reduce the potential for worker exposure, and 3)
improve data quality and reliability by eliminating the opportunity for cross contamination. In all
cases, personnel performing the decontamination procedures will wear protective clothing as
specified in the site-specific Health and Safety Plan.

SOP ENV-120 Page 2 of 4
Equipment Decontamination Procedures June 2009

2. DECONTAMINATION REAGENTS
1 Detergents shall be non-phosphate,
2 Acid rinses (inorganic constituents) shall be reagent grade nitric or hydrochloric
acid,
3 Solvent rinses (organic constituents) shall be pesticide grade methanol, hexane,
isopropopanol or acetone,
4 Deionized water rinses shall be organic free, reagent grade (generally provided by
laboratory),
5 Tap water rinses shall be either local tap water or distilled water available from retail
stores. Note that this distilled water generally contains low levels of organic
contaminants and can not be used for Deionized rinse or blanks.
3. DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES
Reusable sampling equipment will be decontaminated in accordance with the environmental
contaminants suspected or known to be present. More specifically, the purpose of a wash is to
remove all visible particles and residual residue from the sampling equipment utilizing a scrub
brush.
3.1 Low-Level Contamination Sites
Most low-level contamination sites will involve a four step decontamination procedure
as follows:
1. Wash equipment with nonphosphate detergent, scrubbing off any residues
2. Rinse generously with tap water
3. Rinse with deionized water
4. Allow to air dry
3.2 Moderate-Level Contamination Sites
Additional measures may be necessary for moderate to heavily contaminated
equipment that may utilize at least a five step decontamination procedure as noted for
each of the general constituent categories below.
3.2.1 INORGANIC CONTAMINATED SAMPLING EQUIPMENT
1. Wash equipment with nonphosphate detergent, scrubbing off any residues

SOP ENV-120 Page 3 of 4
Equipment Decontamination Procedures June 2009

2. Rinse generously with tap water
3. Rinse equipment with acid rinse (0.1 N nitric or hydrochloric)
4. Rinse with deionized water
5. Allow to air dry

3.2.2 ORGANICALLY CONTAMINATED SAMPLING EQUIPMENT
1 Wash equipment with nonphosphate detergent, scrubbing off any residues
2 Rinse generously with tap water
3 Rinse equipment with solvent rinse
4 Rinse with deionized water
5 Allow to air dry
4. DECONTAMINATION OF SAMPLING PUMPS
When pumps (e.g., submersible or bladder) are submerged below the water surface to collect
water samples, they shall be thoroughly cleaned and flushed between uses. This cleaning
process consists of an external detergent wash and high-pressure tap water rinse, or steam
cleaning of pump casing, tubing, and cables, followed by a flush of potable water through the
pump. This flushing can be accomplished by placing the pump in a newly purchased plastic
garbage can filled with tap water and pumping multiple volumes through the pump. The
procedure should be repeated first with detergent water and then with tap water.
5. DECONTAMINATION OF DRILLING EQUIPMENT
It is the responsibility of drilling contractors to provide adequate resources necessary to ensure
appropriate decontamination of their equipment, and containment for subsequent management
of resultant waste. However, field personnel present should both observe and document this
process to ensure that these procedures protect the environmental quality of the site.
At a minimum, all drilling equipment should be pressure-washed prior to, and immediately
following, borehole locations. Equipment that is re-used for down-hole sampling (i.e. split spoon
samplers) should be decontaminated in accordance with Section 3 Decontamination
Procedures above.

SOP ENV-120 Page 4 of 4
Equipment Decontamination Procedures June 2009

6. INVESTIGATIVE DERIVED WASTE (IDW)
Investigative derived waste (IDW) will be managed in accordance with RSV SOP ENV-110 IDW
Management Procedures and as modified to a specific project’s requirements by the RSV
project manager.

SOP ENV-130 Page 1 of 3
Soil Field Screening Procedures June 2009
SOIL FIELD SCREENING
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

SOP ENV-130

Updated September 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................1
2. FIELD SCREENING METHODS...........................................................................................1
2.1 Visual Screening.............................................................................................................2
2.2 Olfactory Screening ........................................................................................................2
2.3 Headspace Vapor Screening..........................................................................................3

1. INTRODUCTION
This SOP presents the qualitative field screening methods that may be utilized for petroleum
hydrocarbons in soil while in the field. Field screening may be conducted on soil samples
obtained from exploratory boreholes, test pits, other excavations, or surface/near-surface
samples, the results of which are site specific and may vary with soil type, soil moisture and
organic content, ambient air temperature, and type of contaminant.
The field screening techniques described herein are used as a general guideline to delineate
areas with potential residual hydrocarbons and possibly volatile organic compounds, in soils. In
addition, field screening results may be used as a basis for selecting soil samples for chemical
analysis. The SOP is not intended to be an exhaustive list, rather summarize those methods
and procedures that are more commonly utilized for screening soil samples for the purpose of
qualitatively assessing soil quality while in the field.
2. FIELD SCREENING METHODS
The field screening methods employed include 1) visual examination, including color and sheen
testing; 2) olfactory evidence; and 3) headspace vapor testing using a photoionization detector
(PID) (or equivalent meter) calibrated to isobutylene. Sheen testing and headspace vapor
testing are sensitive screening methods that can be useful in detecting hydrocarbon

SOP ENV-130 Page 2 of 3
Soil Field Screening Procedures June 2009

concentrations below typical regulatory cleanup guidelines; however, the effectiveness is
dependant on site-specific characteristics (soil type, type of product released, age of release
etc.). The results of field screening should be included on RSV Field Logs and/or Forms for the
situation as appropriate.
2.1 Visual Screening
Visual screening consists of inspecting the soil for the presence of stains and/or
sheens indicative of residual petroleum hydrocarbons. Visual screening can also be
effective in detecting the presence of heavier petroleum hydrocarbons, such as motor
oil, or when hydrocarbon concentrations are high. Indications of the presence of
hydrocarbons typically include a mottled appearance or dark discoloration of the soil.
Sheen testing involves immersion of the soil sample in water and observing the water
surface for signs of sheen. Typically, by introducing approximately 5 grams of
disaggregated soil to water within either a stainless steel or dark plastic pan filled with
clean water with as little disturbance as possible. Visual evidence of sheen forming on
the surface of the water is classified as follows:
Parameter Analytical Method
No sheen (NS) No visible sheen on the water surface
Colorless
Sheen (CS)
Light, nearly colorless sheen; spread is irregular, not rapid; film
dissipates rapidly (Note: light colorless sheens can be confused
with sheens produced by organic content). Note that this sheen
may or may not indicate the presence hydrocarbons.
Heavy Sheen
(HS)
Light to heavy colorful film with iridescence; stringy, spread is
rapid; sheen flows off the sample; most or all of water surface is
covered with sheen
2.2 Olfactory Screening
Olfactory screening can be effective in assessing for the presence of lighter volatile
aromatic compounds associated with gasoline and diesel fuels, however, olfactory
glands can become “sensitized” over time and effected based on site specific
conditions (i.e. cold) or health of field screening personnel. Since there may be health
and safety concerns with exposure to contaminants through inhalation, the presence of
petroleum odor should only be noted as part of implementing other field screening
methods and should only be considered an inadvertent indicator; however, should not
be conducted as the only method of screening.

SOP ENV-130 Page 3 of 3
Soil Field Screening Procedures June 2009

2.3 Headspace Vapor Screening
Organic vapor levels in soil samples may be measured by the headspace vapor
method utilizing a PhotoVac MicroTIP equipped with a PID and a 10.6 electron volt
(eV) lamp.
Immediately following the collection, a small representative soil sample sample is
placed in a plastic bag and sealed that is allowed to sit at ambient temperature for
approximately 10 minutes. The detector probe is then inserted through the seal into
the bag to collect the headspace sample. The instrument measures the concentration
of organic vapors within the sample bag in parts per million (ppm). All field screening
results should be documented in field forms and/or notes.

SOP ENV-140 Page 1 of 5
Soil Sample Description June 2009
SOIL SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

SOP ENV-140

Updated June 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................1
2. SOIL SAMPLE DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................1

TABLES
1 USCS Field Description Assistant
2 USCS Field Description Tests
1. INTRODUCTION
This SOP presents the methods and procedures for classification of soils while in the field
considered to be an essential part of interpretive efforts regarding one or more sites. In general,
RSV follows the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) that provides a conventional system
for categorizing soils by gradation and plasticity characteristics as provided in detail in the
American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) D-248793 Standard Classification of Soils for
Engineering Purposes (United Soil Classification System) and ASTM D-2488-84
Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedures).
In general, the similarities of consecutive soil samples should be emphasized and minor
differences de-emphasized. These descriptions will be used to assess environmental and
aquifer properties and other potential contaminant transport properties, rather than interpret
mineralogy or tectonic environment.
2. SOIL SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
The physical properties of all soils observed will be logged in the field by an RSV field
representative experienced in such under the supervision of a licensed geologist. Soils should
be classified utilizing the USCS as noted above; USCS soil type designations will be field

SOP ENV-140 Page 2 of 5
Soil Sample Description June 2009

approximations only and will typically not be confirmed by laboratory analyses. Table 1
provides a “USCS Soil Field Description Assistant” while Table 2 provides generic “Field
Description Tests”, that expand on the below general classification scheme:
• Coarse-grained soil descriptions will include: group name, symbol, grading, color, density,
moisture and environmental observations.

• Fine-grained soil descriptions will include: group name, group symbol, color, moisture
plasticity, and environmental observations.
All properties and observations will be recorded on RSV Field Forms and Logs as appropriate.

SOP ENV-140 Page 3 of 5
Soil Sample Description June 2009

TABLE 1 – USCS Soil Field Description Assistant

Generic Description:
Primary Modifier(s), PRIMARY CONSTITUENT, Secondary Modifier(s), USCS Symbol - grain size
(optional: % each grain-size, range of grain size, and angularity), color, moisture, consistency/density, plasticity,
grading (coarse grained soil only other observations, environmental observations

Primary Primary Secondary USCS Symbol
Modifier Constituent Modifier
(highest %) (use gauge)
Coarse Grained: BOULDERS Coarse grained: GW ML
30-50% ADD
"LY" COBBLES 15-30% add
"with some" GP CL
GRAVEL 15%< add "with
trace" GM OL
SAND GC MH
Fine Grained: Fine grained:
10-50% add "ly" SILT 5-10% add
"with some" SW CH
CLAY 5%< add "with
trace" SP OH
PEAT SM OH
SC PT

Grain Angularity Color Moisture
Consistency/
Density
Size Coarse grained Fine grained
(use gauge) (use gauge) (use gauge) Modifier Blows/ft Modifier Blows/ft
coarse gravel v angular brown dry v loose <4 v soft <2
fine gravel angular light brown moist loose 4-10 soft 2-4
coarse sand sub-angular yellow orange wet m
dense 11-30 m stiff 5-8
medium sand sub-rounded light gray dense 31-50 stiff 9-15
fine sand v fine
sand rounded dark gray v dense 50> v stiff 16-30
well rounded greenish gray hard 31-60
olive gray v hard >60

SOP ENV-140 Page 4 of 5
Soil Sample Description June 2009

Consistency Grading Other Environmental
Observations Observations
(fine grained
soil)
(coarse
grained soil)

non-plastic well-graded fill materials O = odor
low plastic poorly-
graded cementation S = sheen by sheen test
med. Plastic uniformly
graded structure D = discoloration
highly plastic gap-graded FP = free product

SOP ENV-140 Page 5 of 5
Soil Sample Description June 2009

TABLE 2 – Soil Field Description Tests

Parameter Descriptor Field Test

Moisture Dry Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch, considerable addition of
moisture required to obtain optimum moisture content
Moist Damp but no visible water, near optimum moisture content.

Wet Near or below the water table - requires drying to obtain optimum moisture
content
Consistency Non-plastic A 1/8" thread cannot be rolled at any water content

Low-plasticity The thread can barely be rolled and the lump cannot be formed when drier
than the plastic limit

Med. Plasticity The thread is easy to roll and not much time is required to reach the
plastic limit; the thread cannot be re-rolled after reaching the plastic limit

High Plasticity It takes considerable time rolling and kneading to reach the plastic limit.
The thread can be re-rolled several times after reaching the plastic limit
Density Very Loose Easily penetrated many inches (>12) with 1/2" rebar pushed by hand
Loose Easily penetrated several inches with 1/2" rebar pushed by hand
Medium Dense Easily to moderately penetrated with 1/2" rebar driven by 5 lb. hammer
Dense Penetrated 12" with difficulty using 1/2" rebar driven by 5 lb. hammer
Very Dense Penetrated only a few inches with 1/2" rebar driven by 5 lb. hammer
Grading Well-Graded Full range and even distribution of grain sizes present (GW/SW)
Poorly-Graded Narrow range of grain sizes present (fine to medium SP)

Uniformly
Graded
Consists predominantly of one grain size (fine SP)

Gap-Graded Within range of grain sizes present, one or more sizes are missing (fine
sand with some coarse gravel (SP)

SOP ENV-150 Page 1 of 3
Logging of Soil Boreholes and Test Pits June 2009
LOGGING OF SOIL BOREHOLES AND TEST PITS
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

SOP ENV-150

Updated June 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................1
2. BASIC INSTALLATION INFORMATION ...............................................................................1
3. TECHNICAL DATA ...............................................................................................................2

1. INTRODUCTION
This Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) presents the general procedures for logging soil
boreholes and/or test pits. These procedures, establish the minimum information that must be
recorded in the field to adequately characterize soil boreholes and/or test pits.
Soil description procedures are adapted from the American Society for Testing Materials
(ASTM) D-248793 Standard Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (United Soil
Classification System) and ASTM D-2488-84 Standard Practice for Description and
Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedures). This SOP modifies some of these
procedures in that it is designed to emphasize environmental investigations as opposed to
geotechnical investigations for which ASTM standard are written. Because environmental
projects are each unique and situation’s requirements can vary widely, the minimum standards
presented may need to be supplemented with additional technical descriptions or field test
results. However, all RSV soil boring and/or test pit field logs, regardless of special project
circumstances, must include the information addressed in this SOP to achieve the minimum
acceptable standards of documentation.
2. BASIC INSTALLATION INFORMATION
At a minimum, the RSV boring or test pit log must include the following.
1. Project Number: Project Number. Use the standard contract number and acronym.
2. Client: Identify the name of the client and the project site location.

SOP ENV-150 Page 2 of 3
Logging of Soil Boreholes and Test Pits June 2009

3. Location: If stationing, coordinates, mileposts, or similar are applicable identify the
location of the project. Collect a gps coordinate of work site and all investigative locations.
4. Drilling/Test Pit Method: For drilling projects, identify the bit size and type, drilling fluid (if
used), and method of drilling (e.g., rotary, hollow-stem auger, cable tool) and the name of
the drill rig (e.g., Mobil B 61, CME 55); for test pit projects identify the equipment type,
make and model number as well as bucket dimensions used.
5. Installation Specifications: Provide the diameter of drilled boreholes; if variable, provide
the depth interval for each diameter. Provide the dimensions of all test pits in length, width,
and depth.
6. Sampling Method: Identify the type of sampler(s) used (e.g., standard split spoon, acetate
sleeve, grab etc..
7. Contractor: Provide the name of the drilling and or excavation contractor.
8. RSV Staff: Enter the name(s) of staff performing logging and sampling activities.
9. Water Level Information: Provide the date, time, depth to static water, and depth from top
of temporary/permanent casing in drilled boreholes and from land surface at test pit
locations. Generally, water levels should be taken each day before resuming drilling and at
the completion of drilling. If water is not encountered in the boring or test pit, this
information should be recorded.
10. Installation Number: Provide a unique boring and/or test pit number for each location. For
more complex sites, a numbering system should be developed prior to drilling and/or test
pitting in accordance with SOP ENV-100 Sample Handling and Custody Procedures and
such that it does not conflict with other site information, such as previous drilling or other
sampling activities.
11. Sheet: Number the sheets consecutively for each boring and/or test pit log and continue
the consecutive depth numbering.
12. Start and Finish: Provide the drilling / test pit start and finish dates and times.
13. For consecutive sheets provide, at a minimum, the job number, the installation number, and
the sheet number.
3. TECHNICAL DATA
1. Sampler Type: Provide the sampler type (split spoon, acetate sleeve, grab etc.)
2. Depth of Installation: Enter the depth of the boring and/or test pit below ground surface
(bgs) immediately prior to sampling.
3. Driven/Recovery: For boring installations, provide the length that the sampler was driven
and the length of sample recovered in the sampler.
4. Sample Number/Sample Depth: Provide the sample number, depth, and time of
collection. The sample numbering scheme should follow SOP ENV-100 Sample Handling
and Custody Procedures. The soil sample interval from drilled borings is determined

SOP ENV-150 Page 3 of 3
Logging of Soil Boreholes and Test Pits June 2009

assuming the top of the recovered soil interval begins at the top of the soil interval
collection point (i.e. 2 feet of soil observed in a 5-foot Macrocore is logged as originating
from the 10 to 12 foot interval); samples should be obtained from the middle of the
recovered sample. Samples from test pits are usually reported in zones of half-foot
increments from (i.e. depth zone between 5.0 and 5.5 feet bgs) relative to depth below
ground surface (bgs).
5. Standard Penetration Test: In situations where a hollow stem auger drilling rig is used,
record the number of blows for each 6 in. of split-spoon sampler penetration.
6. Depth: Use a depth scale that is appropriate for the complexity of the subsurface
conditions.
7. Surface Conditions: Describe the surface conditions (e.g., paved, 4-in. concrete slab,
grass, natural vegetation and surface soil, oil-stained gravel) and note them on the
standardized field log.
8. Soil Description: The classification of soil should follow SOP ENV-140 Soil Description
Procedures.
9. Soil Field Screening: The screening of soils for environmental contamination should follow
those procedures in SOP ENV-130 Soil Field Screening.
10. Soil Sample Collection: Soil sample collection should follow those procedures in SOP
ENV-200 Soil Sampling Procedures.
11. Comments: Include all pertinent observations that may include, but are not limited to:
rod-bounce or chatter (coarse-grained materials), sudden differences in drilling speed
(change in formation), damaged samplers, and malfunctioning equipment, environmental
observations, or fill materials encountered.

SOP ENV-200 Page 1 of 4
Soil Sample Collection June 2009
SOIL SAMPLE COLLECTION
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

SOP ENV-200

Updated June 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................1
2. SOIL SAMPLE COLLECTION METHODS AND PROCEDURES..........................................1
2.1 Sonic Soil Boring Samples..............................................................................................2
2.2 Hollow-Stem Auger Soil Borings .....................................................................................2
2.3 Push Probe Borings........................................................................................................3
2.4 Test Pits..........................................................................................................................3
2.5 Hand Auger Borings .......................................................................................................3
2.6 Surface Soil Samples......................................................................................................4
2.7 Manhole/Catch Basin Solids Samples ............................................................................4
3. OTHER RELATED SOP........................................................................................................4

1. INTRODUCTION
This standard operating procedure (SOP) describes the methods and procedures that may be
utilized for collecting soil samples while in the field. The SOP is not intended to be an
exhaustive list, rather summarize those methods and procedures that are more commonly
utilized for collecting representative soil samples for the purpose of assessing soil quality. As
such, this SOP was developed only as a general guide that may require modification specific to
a given project’s requirements by the RSV project manager. In addition, all sampling efforts
must be conducted in accordance to the site-specific health and safety plan utilizing personnel
protective equipment suitable to meet site conditions.
2. SOIL SAMPLE COLLECTION METHODS AND PROCEDURES
Soil samples may be obtained using a variety of methods and equipment depending on site-
specific factors including, but not limited to, sample depth, type (disturbed or undisturbed), soil
type, purpose, and locations of underground utilities and physical features, utilizing various

SOP ENV-200 Page 2 of 4
Soil Sample Collection June 2009

methods including, but not limited to, drilled soil borings, push probe borings, hand auger
borings, or from directly from surface or near-surface soils using hand tools. In addition, in
some circumstances, soil samples may require preservation, and as such, these samples will be
collected utilizing a new dispensable laboratory-provided sampling device in accordance with
the directions for that particular device.
2.1 Sonic Soil Boring Samples
Sonic borings are typically cored using a 5-inch outer-diameter (OD), 5-foot long,
stainless-steel, core sampler, that is advanced as the drill casing is advanced into the
subsurface.
Soil samples are typically collected from the core-barrel following extrusion into a 5-foot
long plastic bag. If needed, soil samples will be collected by cutting open the plastic
bag, sampling directly into a 4 or 9-ounce sample jar, by pushing a 6-inch long brass
sleeve into the desired sample location that will be capped with Teflon paper, plastic
end caps, and sealed with non-volatile silicon tape, or sampled with a laboratory-
provided coring device. Other sampling methods may be utilized that are beyond the
scope of this SOP. Boreholes will be abandoned in accordance with Oregon Water
Resources Department requirements. Boreholes will be abandoned in accordance with
Oregon Water Resources Department requirements.
2.2 Hollow-Stem Auger Soil Borings
Soil samples from hollow-stem auger drilled borings will be collected with a 2-inch OD
split-barrel sampling device that will be driven into the undisturbed soils 1.5 feet ahead
of the drill bit, using a Standard Penetration Test (SPT).
Soil samples collected from the split-spoon sampling device will be manually
transferred to a 4 or 9-ounce sample jar and capped with Teflon lined lid. In cases
where brass sleeves are utilized (i.e., where volatile compounds are of interest), the
sleeve containing the sample will be capped with Teflon paper, plastic end caps, and
sealed with non-volatile silicon tape, or sampled with a laboratory provided coring
device. Other sampling methods may be utilized that are beyond the scope of this
SOP. Boreholes will be abandoned in accordance with Oregon Water Resources
Department requirements.

SOP ENV-200 Page 3 of 4
Soil Sample Collection June 2009

2.3 Push Probe Borings
Continuous soil cores will be collected from push probe borings using a 2-inch OD, 4 or
5-foot long, stainless-steel, Macro-Core sampler, fitted with a polyvinyl chloride (PVC)
or acetate sleeve, that will be advanced up to 5 feet into undisturbed soils.
Soil samples will be collected from push probes by cutting open the PVC sleeve and
placing soil in either a 4 or 9-ounce sample jar that is capped with Teflon lined lid. In
cases where volatile compounds will be analyzed, soil samples will be collected by
utilizing a laboratory provided coring device and sampling container or by cutting a 6-
inch long section from the PVC sleeve that will immediately be capped with Teflon
paper, plastic end caps, and sealed with silicon (non-VOC) tape. Other sampling
methods may be utilized that are beyond the scope of this SOP. Boreholes will be
abandoned in accordance with Oregon Water Resources Department requirements.
2.4 Test Pits
Shallow test pits (usually less than 12 feet deep) will be installed utilizing a rubber-tire
backhoe and/or excavator. A test pit measuring approximately 3 feet wide by 5 feet
long will typically be excavated to the depth of investigation.
Upon bringing the backhoe bucket to the surface, a sample will be obtained by
scraping away approximately 3 inches of soil from the surface and immediately
collecting the sample into a 4 or 9-ounce glass sample jar with teflon-lined lid using a
newpair of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) gloves. In cases where volatile organic
compounds are anticipated for analysis soil samples will be collected by utilizing a
laboratory provided coring device and sampling container or by cutting a 6-inch long
section from the PVC sleeve that will immediately be capped with Teflon paper, plastic
end caps, and sealed with silicon (non-VOC) tape. Following completion, the test pit
will be backfilled with the removed soil and compacted with the backhoe bucket in two-
foot lifts, unless dictated otherwise by site conditions or the project manager.
2.5 Hand Auger Borings
Soil samples collected can be collected from a hand auger equipped with a 2-inch OD
hollow bit. Once the desired sampling depth is attained, the hand auger will be
removed from the hole and soil collected from the auger tip.
In cases where volatile compounds will be analyzed, once the desired sampling depth
is reached, upon removal of the auger, a laboratory provided coring device will be used

SOP ENV-200 Page 4 of 4
Soil Sample Collection June 2009

to collect a sample from the auger tip into the appropriately preserved sampling
container. Alternatively, samples may be collected with a decontaminated slide-
hammer sampler equipped with a 6-inch long brass sleeve capped and sealed as
noted in Section 3.3 above. Where appropriate, hand auger borings will be abandoned
in accordance with Oregon Water Resources Department requirements.
2.6 Surface Soil Samples
Surface grab soil samples will be collected utilizing a new pair or nitrile gloves with
access facilitated using a decontaminated stainless steel trowel, if necessary, and by
scraping approximately 3-inches of overly soil from beneath asphalt, concrete, gravel,
or soil surface cover directly into a laboratory provided sampling container.
2.7 Manhole/Catch Basin Solids Samples
Samples of solids from manholes or catch basins will be collected from the inside
bottom portion of manholes/catch basins with a decontaminated stainless-steel hand
auger. For safety reasons, manholes will not be physically entered by sampling
personnel. The solids samples will be collected at the bottom portion of the installation
in areas away from the main flow.
3. OTHER RELATED SOP
Soil sampling activities must be conducted in accordance with the following RSV SOP’s:
1) ENV-10 Field Documentation,
2) ENV-100 Sample Handling and Custody,
3) ENV-110 Investigative Derived Waste Management,
4) ENV-120 Equipment Decontamination,
5) ENV-130 Soil Field Screening,
6) ENV-140 Soil Sample Description,
7) ENV-150 Logging of Boreholes and Test Pits.

SOP ENV-320 Page 1 of 3
Push Probe and Temporary Well Point Groundwater Sampling Procedure July 2009
PUSH PROBE AND TEMPORARY WELL POINT GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

SOP ENV-320

Updated July 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................1
2. TEMPORARY WELL POINT INSTALLATION AND SAMPLING ...........................................1
2.1 Screen Placement ..........................................................................................................1
2.2 Purging...........................................................................................................................2
2.3 Sample Collection...........................................................................................................3
2.4 Other Procedures ...........................................................................................................3

1. INTRODUCTION
This standard operating procedure (SOP) describes the methods and procedures that will be
used to obtain a representative sample of groundwater sample from a temporary well point or
push probe boring using several types of commonly used equipment. The SOP herein was not
designed to be exhaustive for all sampling programs that may be required during field
operations, and as such, this SOP was developed only as a general guide that may require
modification specific to a given project’s requirements by the RSV project manager.
In all cases, personnel performing the sampling procedures will wear protective clothing as
specified in the site-specific Health and Safety Plan.
2. TEMPORARY WELL POINT INSTALLATION AND SAMPLING
2.1 Screen Placement
1. Measure water level in push-probe or auger boring to ensure temporary well point
screen is placed across the depth of the soil/water interface, or at the depth
specified in the site-specific work plan and/or RSV project manager. Consider
possibility of perched groundwater or sealed-of zones when measuring static water
level. In some cases, it may be prudent to pull-back outer casing slightly based on
subsurface soil encountered.

SOP ENV-320 Page 2 of 3
Push Probe and Temporary Well Point Groundwater Sampling Procedure June 2009

2. Set the temporary well point screen, and if possible, place a temporary sand-pack
around the screen to reduce fines in the water sample.
3. Expose temporary well point screen and sand pack, if any, by pulling back outer
casing.
4. Measure and document static water level on the RSV temporary well point record.
5. Calculate one casing storage volume then multiply by three to obtain minimum
volumes desired to be purged.
6. Document all findings on RSV field forms and logs.
2.2 Purging
7. Lower decontaminated submersible pump or unused disposable sample tubing to
peristaltic pump into upper three-feet of static water level within the borehole; leave
sufficient length at land surface such that pump tubing can be lowered if well draws
down more than three feet.
8. Attempt to purge at least one borehole volume with a preference for three; if
possible, gather basic field parameters of ph, temperature, and conductivity for
each borehole volume.
9. Purge the temporary well point at a rate such that the well does not draw down
more than three feet from static water level, if the pump draws-down more than
three feet, lower the pump intake or tubing as in 3 above; however, do not lower
such that it hits the bottom of the well that could disturb settled sediments.
10. Monitor the cumulative volume pumped using an in-line meter or graduated
container while.
11. Measure field parameters required for the project, but at a minimum, pH,
temperature, and specific conductance at regular intervals. Verify static water level
with an electric water level meter (conductive probe) at selected times during the
purging process.
12. Well purging is complete when three well volumes have been purged and the
minimum parameters of pH, temperature, and specific conductance have stabilized
(as well as any other required parameters); or the temporary well point has gone
dry and recharged sufficiently for collection of samples.

SOP ENV-320 Page 3 of 3
Push Probe and Temporary Well Point Groundwater Sampling Procedure June 2009

2.3 Sample Collection
13. After purging has been completed, carefully fill each laboratory-supplied sample
container, making an effort to minimize sample turbulence. As appropriate, sample
containers will be filled in the following order: organic compounds (volatile organic
compounds, total petroleum hydrocarbons, semi-volatile organic compounds,
polychlorinated biphenyls), specialty parameters, and inorganics (unfiltered followed
by filtered). Volatile organic compounds should not be collected utilizing a peristaltic
pump unless purging data meet the criteria for low-flow sampling (see RSV SOP
ENV-310). In circumstances where VOC samples are required, field personnel can
either use the purge water tubing as a mini-bailer for collection of a sample with
minimal disturbance or volatilization, or alternatively use a submersible pump at
low flow rate (100 ml/l) if it had been used for temporary well point purging.
14. All VOC sample containers should be inverted to ensure they do not contain any
headspace or air bubbles. All other sample containers should be filled to the top.
Containers that have preservatives added to them prior to sampling will not be
overfilled. Repeat this step until a sufficient sample volume is acquired.
2.4 Other Procedures
15. Collect Static water level measurements using principals in SOP ENV-330 Static
Water Level Measurement Procedure.
16. Manage all samples in accordance with SOP ENV-100 Sample Handling and
Custody Procedures.
17. Mange all investigative derived waste (IDW) with SOP ENV-110 IDW Management
Procedures.
18. Decontaminate re-usable sample equipment in accordance with SOP ENV-120
Equipment Decontamination Procedures.

Appendix B

Field Push Probe Drilling Logs

BORING LOG KEY
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS)
MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP
SYMBOL TYPICAL NAMES
GRAVELS Clean Gravels GW Well Graded Gravels, Gravel-Sand Mixtures, Little or no Fines
COARSE
GRAINED
(little or no fines)GP Poorly Graded Gravels, Gravel-Sand Mixtures, Little or no Fines
SOILS Gravels With Fines GM Silty Gravels, Gravel-Sand-Silt Mixtures
(appreciable amount of
fines)GC Clayey Gravels, Gravel-Sand-Clay Mixtures
SANDS Clean Sand SW Well-Graded Sands, Gravelly Sands, Little or no Fines
(little or no fines)
SP Poorly-Graded Sands, Gravelly Sands, Little or nno Fines
Sands with Fines SM Silty-Sands, Sand-Silt Mixtures
(appreciable amount of
fines)SC Clayey Sands, Sand-Clay Mixtures
SILTS AND CLAYS ML Inorganic Silts and Very Fine Sands, Silty or Clayey Fine Sands
or Clayey Silts
FINE
GRAINED Liquid Limit Less Than 50 CL Inorganic Clays, Gravelly Clays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Loean
Clays
SOILS OL Organic Silts and Silty Clays
SILTS AND CLAYS MH Inorganic Silts, Micaceous or diatomaceous Fine Sand or Silty
Soil
Liquid Limit Greater Than 50 CH Inorganic Clays and Organic Silts
OH Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils with Organics
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS Pt Peat and Other Highly Organic Soils
Abbreviations Used:Symbols Used:
hrs. = hours Estimated Water Level During Drilling
No. = number
PID = photoionization detector
TWP = temporary well point
USCS = Unified Soil Classification System
Limitations:
Boring log soil description and classification is based on field observations conducted using the degree of care and skill
ordinarily exercised by, and consistent with, the standards of competent environmental science professionals. Soil
observations are not based on field or laboratory testing. No explatory program can eliminate uncertainty regarding
stratigraphic boundaries, and as such, logged descriptions are approximate representations only. In addition, no warranty is
provided as to the continuity of soil strata between borings.
TABLE 1 – Rock Core Field Reference Sheet
Texture:
Pegmatitic (PEG) - grains very large
Phaneritic (PHAN) - grains seen with naked eye
Aphanitic (APH) - grains cannot be seen with naked
eye
Lithology
Weathering:
Fresh (F)
Very
Slight(VSL)
Slight(SL)
Moderate (M)
ModeratelySevere(MS)
Severe (SV)
VerySevere (VSV)
Complete (C)
Rockisfresh, crystalsarebright, few joints,
may show slight staining as aresultof
groundwater. Rock rings under hammer if
crystalline.
Rockisgenerallyfresh, jointsare stained,
some joints may have thin claycoatings,crystals in broken face show bright. Rock
ringsunder hammer if crystalline.
Rock is generally fresh, joins are stained and
discoloration extendsinto rock upto 1 in.Joints may contain clay. In granitoid rocks
some feldspar crystalsare dulland discol-ored. Rocks ring under hammer ifcrystalline.
Significant portionsof rockshow discolor-
ation and weathering effects. In granitoiedrocks, most feldsparsare dull and discolored;
some are clayey. Rockhasdullsound underhammer and showssignificant lossof
strength as compared with freshrock.
All rock, except quartz, discolored or stained.
In granitoiedrocks, all feldsparsdulland dis-colored an majorityshow kaolinization. Rock
shows severe lossof strength and can beexcavated with geologist’spick. Rockgoes
“clunk” when struck.
Allrock, except quartz, discolored or stained.
Rock“fabric” isclear and evident butreduced in strength to strongsoil. In grani-
toid rocks, allfeldspars kaolinized tosomeextent. Some fragments of harder rock usu-
ally left such ascorestonses in basalt.
Allrock, except quartz, discolored or stained.Rock“fabric” isdiscernible, but mass effec-
tivelyreduced to :soil” withonlyfragmentsofharder rock remaining.
Rock is reduced to “soil”. Rock“fabric” isnot
discernible, or onlyinsmall scatteredloca-
tions. Quartzmaybe presentas dikesorstringers.
Roughness:
Stepped - Near normal steps and ridges occur on the fracture surface
Rough - Large, angular asperities can be seen
M. Rough - Asperities are clearly visible and fracture surface feels abrasive
SL Rough - Small asperities on the fracture surface are visible and can be felt
Smooth - No asperities, smooth to the touch
Discontinuity
Vesicularity:
Dense (non) - <1%
Slightly Vesicular - 1 - 10%
M. Vesicular - 10 - 30%
Highly Vesicular - 30 - 50%
Scoriaceous - >50%
Structure (joints/bedding spacing):
Spacing Joints Bedding
2 in. Very close Very thin
2 in - 1 ft Close Thin
1 ft - 3 ft M. Close Medium
3 ft - 10 ft Wide Thick
Crumbles under firm blows with point of
geology pick, can be peeled by a pocket knife
Can be peeled with a pocket knife with
difficulty, shallow indentation made by firm
blows of geology pick
Cannot be scraped or peeled withy a pocket
knife, specimen can be fractured with a single
firm blow of geology hammer
Specimen required more than one blow with a
geology hammer to fracture it
Specimen required many blows of geology
hammer to fracture it
Specimen can only be chipped with a geology
hammer
28 -100
100 -1,000
4,000 - 8,000
8,000 - 16,000
16,000 -
32,000
R>32,000
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
Very Soft (VS)
Soft (S)
Medium
Hard (MH)
Hard (H)
Very
Hard (VH)
Very High
Strength (VHS)
Field Identification:UCS (appx.
i)
De
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
Co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
y
___________________________________
File: Rock Core Field Reference Sheet.xls, Rock Core Parameter Reference
___________________________________
Page 1 of 1
BORING LOG TW-1
Project Number: 0010736.00 Phase 002 Boring Start: 107/10
Project Name: General Steel Drum Facility Boring End: 10/7/10
Address: 4500 South Boulevard Contractor: McCall Brothers, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina Equipment: GeoProbeTM
RSV Logger: Paula Richardson Sampling Method(s): Continuous Core
Log Detail
Ab
a
n
d
o
n
m
e
n
t
Te
m
p
.

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Gr
o
u
n
d
Wa
t
e
r
De
p
t
h
Sa
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
PI
D
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
Im
p ac
t
Co
r
e
In
t
e
r
v
a
l
Gr
a
p
h
i
c

L
o
g
Soil Description
0
1
2
3
4
5 -0.0
6
7
8
9
10 -0.0
11
12
13
14
15 -0.0
16
17
18
19
20 -0.4

te
m
p or
a
r
y
ris
e
r
te
m
p or
a
r
y
sc
r
e
e
n
SILT (ML) - pink-orange-white mottled, moist, firm, no odor, no
discoloration
B en
t
o
n
i te
SILT (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
SILT (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
SILT (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
SILT (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
___________________________________
Boring Logs
File: 0010736.00 Boring Logs.xls, TW-1
___________________________________
Page 1 of 2
Updated: 10/18/10 GHT
BORING LOG TW-1
Project Number: 0010736.00 Phase 002 Boring Start: 107/10
Project Name: General Steel Drum Facility Boring End: 10/7/10
Address: 4500 South Boulevard Contractor: McCall Brothers, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina Equipment: GeoProbeTM
RSV Logger: Paula Richardson Sampling Method(s): Continuous Core
Log Detail
Ab
a
n
d
o
n
m
e
n
t
Te
m
p
.

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Gr
o
u
n
d
Wa
t
e
r
De
p
t
h
Sa
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
PI
D
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
Im
p ac
t
Co
r
e
In
t
e
r
v
a
l
Gr
a
p
h
i
c

L
o
g
Soil Description

21
22
23
24
25 --
26
27
28
29
30 --
31
32
33
34
35 --
36
37
38
39
40
Bottom of boring 35' bgs
Temporary well point completed to 15-25' bgs (10/6/10), then 25-
35' bgs (10/7/10): water was not encountered.
Boring abandoned 10/7/10)
B en
t
o
n
i te
te
m
p or
a
r
y s
c
r
e
e
n
te
m
p or
a
r
y s
c
r
e
e
n
SILT (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
SILT (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
SILT (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
SILT (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
___________________________________
Boring Logs
File: 0010736.00 Boring Logs.xls, TW-1
___________________________________
Page 2 of 2
Updated: 10/18/10 GHT
BORING LOG TW-2
Project Number: 0010736.00 Phase 002 Boring Start: 10/7/10
Project Name: General Steel Drum Facility Boring End: 10/7/10
Address: 4500 South Boulevard Contractor: McCall Brothers, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina Equipment: GeoProbeTM
RSV Logger: Paula Richardson Sampling Method(s): Continuous Core
Log Detail
Ab
a
n
d
o
n
m
e
n
t
Te
m
p
.

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Gr
o
u
n
d
Wa
t
e
r
De
p
t
h
Sa
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
PI
D
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
Im
p ac
t
Co
r
e
In
t
e
r
v
a
l
Gr
a
p
h
i
c

L
o
g
Soil Description
0
1
2
3
4
5 -0.2
6
7
8
9
10 -0.0
11
12
13
14
15 -0.1
16
17
18
19
20 -0

te
m
p or
a
r
y
ris
e
r
te
m
p or
a
r
y
sc
r
e
e
n
SILT (ML) -pink-orange-white mottled, moist, firm, no odor, no
discoloration
B en
t on
it
e
SILT (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
10
/
7
/
1
0
SILT (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
SILT (ML) - as above, most to wet, no odor, no discoloration
SILT (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
Asphaltasphalt
___________________________________
Boring Logs
File: 0010736.00 Boring Logs.xls, TW-2
___________________________________
Page 1 of 2
Updated: 10/18/10 GHT
BORING LOG TW-2
Project Number: 0010736.00 Phase 002 Boring Start: 10/7/10
Project Name: General Steel Drum Facility Boring End: 10/7/10
Address: 4500 South Boulevard Contractor: McCall Brothers, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina Equipment: GeoProbeTM
RSV Logger: Paula Richardson Sampling Method(s): Continuous Core
Log Detail
Ab
a
n
d
o
n
m
e
n
t
Te
m
p
.

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Gr
o
u
n
d
Wa
t
e
r
De
p
t
h
Sa
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
PI
D
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
Im
p ac
t
Co
r
e
In
t
e
r
v
a
l
Gr
a
p
h
i
c

L
o
g
Soil Description

21
22
23
24
25 --
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33

34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Bottom of boring 25' bgs
Temporary well point completed to 15-25' bgs (10/7/10);
Sample TW-102 collected 10/7/10 @ 11:00 hrs
Boring abandoned 10/7/10)
Be
n
t
o
n
i
t
e
te
m
p or
a
r
y s
c
r
e
e
n
SILT (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
SILT (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
___________________________________
Boring Logs
File: 0010736.00 Boring Logs.xls, TW-2
___________________________________
Page 2 of 2
Updated: 10/18/10 GHT
BORING LOG TW-3
Project Number: 0010736.00 Phase 002 Boring Start: 10/6/10
Project Name: General Steel Drum Facility Boring End: 10/7/10
Address: 4500 South Boulevard Contractor: McCall Brothers, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina Equipment: GeoProbeTM
RSV Logger: Paula Richardson Sampling Method(s): Continuous Core
Log Detail
Ab
a
n
d
o
n
m
e
n
t
Te
m
p
.

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Gr
o
u
n
d
Wa
t
e
r
De
p
t
h
Sa
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
PI
D
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
Im
p ac
t
Co
r
e
In
t
e
r
v
a
l
Gr
a
p
h
i
c

L
o
g
Soil Description
0
1
2
3
4
5 -0.2
6
7
8
9
10 -4.8
11
12
13
14
15 -3.2
16
17
18
19
20 -5.4

te
m
p or
a
r
y
ris
e
r
te
m
p or
a
r
y
sc
r
e
e
n
SILT (ML) - red-orange, moist, firm, no odor, no discoloration
B en
t on
it
e
SILT (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
10
/
6
/
1
0
SILT (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
SILT (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
Asphaltasphalt
SILT (4-inch gravel lenses at 16 and 18 feet bgs) (ML) - red-
orange, moist, firm, no odor, no discoloration
___________________________________
Boring Logs
File: 0010736.00 Boring Logs.xls, TW-3
___________________________________
Page 1 of 2
Updated: 10/18/10 GHT
BORING LOG TW-3
Project Number: 0010736.00 Phase 002 Boring Start: 10/6/10
Project Name: General Steel Drum Facility Boring End: 10/7/10
Address: 4500 South Boulevard Contractor: McCall Brothers, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina Equipment: GeoProbeTM
RSV Logger: Paula Richardson Sampling Method(s): Continuous Core
Log Detail
Ab
a
n
d
o
n
m
e
n
t
Te
m
p
.

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Gr
o
u
n
d
Wa
t
e
r
De
p
t
h
Sa
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
PI
D
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
Im
p ac
t
Co
r
e
In
t
e
r
v
a
l
Gr
a
p
h
i
c

L
o
g
Soil Description

21
22
23
24
25 --
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33

34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Bottom of boring 25' bgs
Temporary well point completed to 15-25' bgs (10/6/10);
Sample TW-103 collected 10/7/10 @ 11:30 hrs
Boring abandoned 10/7/10)
Be
n
t
o
n
i
t
e
te
m
p or
a
r
y s
c
r
e
e
n
SAND (SP) - red-orange, wet, dense, no odor, no discoloration
SAND (SP) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
___________________________________
Boring Logs
File: 0010736.00 Boring Logs.xls, TW-3
___________________________________
Page 2 of 2
Updated: 10/18/10 GHT
BORING LOG TW-4
Project Number: 0010736.00 Phase 002 Boring Start: 10/6/10
Project Name: General Steel Drum Facility Boring End: 10/6/10
Address: 4500 South Boulevard Contractor: McCall Brothers, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina Equipment: GeoProbeTM
RSV Logger: Paula Richardson Sampling Method(s): Continuous Core
Log Detail
Ab
a
n
d
o
n
m
e
n
t
Te
m
p
.

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Gr
o
u
n
d
Wa
t
e
r
De
p
t
h
Sa
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
PI
D
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
Im
p ac
t
Co
r
e
In
t
e
r
v
a
l
Gr
a
p
h
i
c

L
o
g
Soil Description
0
1
2
3
4
5 -2.4
6
7
8
9
10 -0.0
11
12
13
14
15 -0.4
16
17
18
19
20 -0.0

te
m
p or
a
r
y
ris
e
r
te
m
p or
a
r
y
sc
r
e
e
n
CLAY with trace Gravel (CL) - red-brown, moist, firm, no odor, no
discoloration
B en
t on
it
e
CLAY with trace Gravel (CL) - as above, no odor, no
discoloration
10
/
6
/
1
0
CLAY with trace Gravel (CL) - as above, no odor, no
discoloration
CLAY with trace Gravel (CL) - as above, no odor, no
discoloration
Asphaltasphalt
___________________________________
Boring Logs
File: 0010736.00 Boring Logs.xls, TW-4
___________________________________
Page 1 of 2
Updated: 10/18/10 GHT
BORING LOG TW-4
Project Number: 0010736.00 Phase 002 Boring Start: 10/6/10
Project Name: General Steel Drum Facility Boring End: 10/6/10
Address: 4500 South Boulevard Contractor: McCall Brothers, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina Equipment: GeoProbeTM
RSV Logger: Paula Richardson Sampling Method(s): Continuous Core
Log Detail
Ab
a
n
d
o
n
m
e
n
t
Te
m
p
.

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Gr
o
u
n
d
Wa
t
e
r
De
p
t
h
Sa
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
PI
D
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
Im
p ac
t
Co
r
e
In
t
e
r
v
a
l
Gr
a
p
h
i
c

L
o
g
Soil Description

21
22
23
24
25 --
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33

34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Bottom of boring 25' bgs
Temporary well point completed to 15-25' bgs (10/6/10);
Sample TW-104 collected 10/6/10 @ 14:00 hrs
Boring abandoned (10/6/10)
Be
n
t
o
n
i
t
e
te
m
p or
a
r
y s
c
r
e
e
n
CLAY with trace Gravel (CL) - as above, no odor, no
discoloration
CLAY with trace Gravel (CL) - as above, no odor, no
discoloration
___________________________________
Boring Logs
File: 0010736.00 Boring Logs.xls, TW-4
___________________________________
Page 2 of 2
Updated: 10/18/10 GHT
BORING LOG TW-5
Project Number: 0010736.00 Phase 002 Boring Start: 10/6/10
Project Name: General Steel Drum Facility Boring End: 10/7/10
Address: 4500 South Boulevard Contractor: McCall Brothers, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina Equipment: GeoProbeTM
RSV Logger: Paula Richardson Sampling Method(s): Continuous Core
Log Detail
Ab
a
n
d
o
n
m
e
n
t
Te
m
p
.

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Gr
o
u
n
d
Wa
t
e
r
De
p
t
h
Sa
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
PI
D
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
Im
p ac
t
Co
r
e
In
t
e
r
v
a
l
Gr
a
p
h
i
c

L
o
g
Soil Description
0
1
2
3
4
5 -6.7
6
7
8
9
10 -4.5
11
12
13
14
15 -5.8
16
17
18
19
20 -6.6

te
m
p or
a
r
y
ris
e
r
te
m
p or
a
r
y
sc
r
e
e
n
CLAY with trace Sand (CL) - red-brown, moist, firm, no odor, no
discoloration
B en
t on
it
e
10
/
7
/
1
0
SILT with trace Gravel (ML) - as above, no odor, no
discoloration
SILT with trace Gravel (ML) - red-brown, moist to wet, firm, no
odor, no discoloration
Asphaltasphalt
CLAY with trace Sand (CL) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
Very Severely Weathered BEDROCK - moist-wet, no odor, no
discoloration
___________________________________
Boring Logs
File: 0010736.00 Boring Logs.xls, TW-5
___________________________________
Page 1 of 2
Updated: 10/18/10 GHT
BORING LOG TW-5
Project Number: 0010736.00 Phase 002 Boring Start: 10/6/10
Project Name: General Steel Drum Facility Boring End: 10/7/10
Address: 4500 South Boulevard Contractor: McCall Brothers, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina Equipment: GeoProbeTM
RSV Logger: Paula Richardson Sampling Method(s): Continuous Core
Log Detail
Ab
a
n
d
o
n
m
e
n
t
Te
m
p
.

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Gr
o
u
n
d
Wa
t
e
r
De
p
t
h
Sa
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
PI
D
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
Im
p ac
t
Co
r
e
In
t
e
r
v
a
l
Gr
a
p
h
i
c

L
o
g
Soil Description

21
22
23
24
25 --
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33

34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Bottom of boring 25' bgs
Temporary well point completed to 15-25' bgs (10/6/10);
Sample TW-105 collected 10/7/10 @ 12:30 hrs
Boring abandoned 10/7/10)
Be
n
t
o
n
i
t
e
te
m
p or
a
r
y s
c
r
e
e
n
Very Severely Weathered BEDROCK - as above, wet, no odor, no
discoloration
___________________________________
Boring Logs
File: 0010736.00 Boring Logs.xls, TW-5
___________________________________
Page 2 of 2
Updated: 10/18/10 GHT
BORING LOG TW-6
Project Number: 0010736.00 Phase 002 Boring Start: 10/6/10
Project Name: General Steel Drum Facility Boring End: 10/7/10
Address: 4500 South Boulevard Contractor: McCall Brothers, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina Equipment: GeoProbeTM
RSV Logger: Paula Richardson Sampling Method(s): Continuous Core
Log Detail
Ab
a
n
d
o
n
m
e
n
t
Te
m
p
.

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Gr
o
u
n
d
Wa
t
e
r
De
p
t
h
Sa
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
PI
D
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
Im
p ac
t
Co
r
e
In
t
e
r
v
a
l
Gr
a
p
h
i
c

L
o
g
Soil Description
0
1
2
3
4
5 -4.3
6
7
8
9
10 -2.3
11
12
13
14
15 -3.0
16
17
18
19
20 -4.5

te
m
p or
a
r
y
ris
e
r
B en
t on
it
e
SILT (ML) - red-orange, moist, firm, no odor, no discoloration
Asphaltasphalt
SAND with some Silt (SM) - red-orange, moist, loose, no odor, no
discoloration
SAND with some Silt (SM) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
SAND with some Silt (SM) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
Very Severely Weathered BEDROCK - moist-wet, no odor, no
discoloration
___________________________________
Boring Logs
File: 0010736.00 Boring Logs.xls, TW-6
___________________________________
Page 1 of 2
Updated: 10/18/10 GHT
BORING LOG TW-6
Project Number: 0010736.00 Phase 002 Boring Start: 10/6/10
Project Name: General Steel Drum Facility Boring End: 10/7/10
Address: 4500 South Boulevard Contractor: McCall Brothers, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina Equipment: GeoProbeTM
RSV Logger: Paula Richardson Sampling Method(s): Continuous Core
Log Detail
Ab
a
n
d
o
n
m
e
n
t
Te
m
p
.

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Gr
o
u
n
d
Wa
t
e
r
De
p
t
h
Sa
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
PI
D
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
Im
p ac
t
Co
r
e
In
t
e
r
v
a
l
Gr
a
p
h
i
c

L
o
g
Soil Description

21
22
23
24
25 --
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33

34
35
36
37
38
39
40
10
/
7
/
1
0
Bottom of boring 30' bgs
Temporary well point completed to 20-30' bgs (10/6/10);
Sample TW-106 collected 10/7/10 @ 13:00 hrs
Boring abandoned 10/7/10)
Be
n
t
o
n
i
t
e
te
m
p or
a
r
y s
c
r
e
e
n
Very Severely Weathered BEDROCK - as above, wet, no odor, no
discoloration
Very Severely Weathered BEDROCK - as above, no odor, no
discoloration
Very Severely Weathered BEDROCK - as above, no odor, no
discoloration
___________________________________
Boring Logs
File: 0010736.00 Boring Logs.xls, TW-6
___________________________________
Page 2 of 2
Updated: 10/18/10 GHT
BORING LOG SB-1
Project Number: 0010736.00 Phase 002 Boring Start: 10/7/10
Project Name: General Steel Drum Facility Boring End: 10/7/10
Address: 4500 South Boulevard Contractor: McCall Brothers, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina Equipment: GeoProbeTM
RSV Logger: Paula Richardson Sampling Method(s): Continuous Core
Log Detail
Ab
a
n
d
o
n
m
e
n
t
Te
m
p
.

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Gr
o
u
n
d
Wa
t
e
r
De
p
t
h
Sa
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
Ti
m
e
PI
D
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
Im
p ac
t
Co
r
e
In
t
e
r
v
a
l
Gr
a
p
h
i
c

L
o
g
Soil Description
0
1
2
3
4
5 201 12:45 0.0
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

B en
t
o
n
i te
Bottom of boring 5' bgs
Groundwater not encountered
Boring abandoned 10/7/10)
SILT (ML) - red-orange, moist, firm, no odor, no discoloration
Asphaltasphalt
Silt (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
___________________________________
Boring Logs
File: 0010736.00 Boring Logs.xls, SB-1
___________________________________
Page 1 of 1
Updated: 10/18/10 GHT
BORING LOG SB-2
Project Number: 0010736.00 Phase 002 Boring Start: 10/7/10
Project Name: General Steel Drum Facility Boring End: 10/7/10
Address: 4500 South Boulevard Contractor: McCall Brothers, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina Equipment: GeoProbeTM
RSV Logger: Paula Richardson Sampling Method(s): Continuous Core
Log Detail
Ab
a
n
d
o
n
m
e
n
t
Te
m
p
.

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Gr
o
u
n
d
Wa
t
e
r
De
p
t
h
Sa
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
Ti
m
e
PI
D
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
Im
p ac
t
Co
r
e
In
t
e
r
v
a
l
Gr
a
p
h
i
c

L
o
g
Soil Description
0
1
2
3
4
5 202 13:15 0.4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

B en
t
o
n
i te
Bottom of boring 5' bgs
Groundwater not encountered
Boring abandoned 10/7/10)
SILT (ML) - red-orange, moist, firm, no odor, no discoloration
Asphaltasphalt
Silt (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
___________________________________
Boring Logs
File: 0010736.00 Boring Logs.xls, SB-2
___________________________________
Page 1 of 1
Updated: 10/18/10 GHT
BORING LOG SB-3
Project Number: 0010736.00 Phase 002 Boring Start: 10/7/10
Project Name: General Steel Drum Facility Boring End: 10/7/10
Address: 4500 South Boulevard Contractor: McCall Brothers, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina Equipment: GeoProbeTM
RSV Logger: Paula Richardson Sampling Method(s): Continuous Core
Log Detail
Ab
a
n
d
o
n
m
e
n
t
Te
m
p
.

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Gr
o
u
n
d
Wa
t
e
r
De
p
t
h
Sa
m
p
l
e

N
o
.
Ti
m
e
PI
D
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
Im
p ac
t
Co
r
e
In
t
e
r
v
a
l
Gr
a
p
h
i
c

L
o
g
Soil Description
0
1
2
3
4
5 -0.6
6
7 203 13:30 0.0
8
9
10 -1.3
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

B en
t
o
n
i te
Bottom of boring 10' bgs
Groundwater not encountered
Boring abandoned 10/7/10)
SILT (ML) - red-orange, moist, firm, no odor, no discoloration
Asphaltasphalt
Silt (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
Silt (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
Silt (ML) - as above, no odor, no discoloration
___________________________________
Boring Logs
File: 0010736.00 Boring Logs.xls, SB-3
___________________________________
Page 1 of 1
Updated: 10/18/10 GHT

Appendix C

Laboratory Reports and Chain of Custody Documentation –
Soil Samples

October 14, 2010
LIMS USE: FR - PAULA RICHARDSON
LIMS OBJECT ID: 9279322
9279322
Project:
Pace Project No.:
RE:
Ms. Paula Richardson
RSV-Jefferson
146 E. Milwaukee St.
Jefferson, WI 53549
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-736
Dear Ms. Richardson:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on October 07, 2010.
The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the
most current NELAC standards, where applicable, unless otherwise narrated in the body of the
report.
Inorganic Wet Chemistry and Metals analyses were performed at our Pace Asheville laboratory and
Organic testing was performed at our Pace Huntersville laboratory unless otherwise footnoted. All
Microbiological analyses were performed at the laboratory where the samples were received.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Erin Waters
[e-mail]
Project Manager
Enclosures
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 1 of 11
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
CERTIFICATIONS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279322
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-736
Charlotte Certification IDs9800 Kincey Ave. Ste 100, Huntersville, NC 28078Louisiana/LELAP Certification #: 04034
New Jersey Certification #: NC012North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37706North Carolina Field Services Certification #: 5342North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 12Pennsylvania Certification #: 68-00784
South Carolina Certification #: 99006001South Carolina Drinking Water Cert. #: 99006003
Virginia Certification #: 00213Connecticut Certification #: PH-0104Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87627Kentucky UST Certification #: 84Louisiana DHH Drinking Water # LA 100031
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 2 of 11
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279322
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-736
Lab ID Sample ID Method
Analytes
Reported LaboratoryAnalysts
9279322001 SB-201 EPA 8015 Modified 2 PASI-CRES
9071B 1 PASI-CEAJ
EPA 8015 Modified 2 PASI-CAW
ASTM D2974-87 1 PASI-CKDF
9279322002 SB-202 EPA 8015 Modified 2 PASI-CRES
9071B 1 PASI-CEAJ
EPA 8015 Modified 2 PASI-CAW
ASTM D2974-87 1 PASI-CKDF
9279322003 SB-203 EPA 8015 Modified 2 PASI-CRES
EPA 8015 Modified 2 PASI-CAW
ASTM D2974-87 1 PASI-CKDF
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 3 of 11
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279322
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-736
Sample:SB-201 Lab ID:9279322001 Collected:10/07/10 12:45 Received:10/07/10 15:10 Matrix:Solid
Results reported on a "dry-weight" basis
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
8015 GCS THC-Diesel Analytical Method: EPA 8015 Modified Preparation Method: EPA 3546
Diesel Components ND mg/kg 1 10/11/10 18:10 68334-30-510/11/10 10:456.8
n-Pentacosane (S)68 %1 10/11/10 18:10 629-99-210/11/10 10:4541-119
9071 Oil and Grease Analytical Method: 9071B Preparation Method: 9071B
Oil and Grease ND mg/kg 1 10/12/10 10:0410/12/10 08:1596.3
Gasoline Range Organics Analytical Method: EPA 8015 Modified Preparation Method: EPA 5035A/5030B
Gasoline Range Organics ND mg/kg 1 10/14/10 12:58 8006-61-910/14/10 11:076.7
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)143 %1 10/14/10 12:58 460-00-410/14/10 11:0770-167
Percent Moisture Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87
Percent Moisture 27.3 %1 10/08/10 13:430.10
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/14/2010 04:05 PM Page 4 of 11
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279322
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-736
Sample:SB-202 Lab ID:9279322002 Collected:10/07/10 13:15 Received:10/07/10 15:10 Matrix:Solid
Results reported on a "dry-weight" basis
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
8015 GCS THC-Diesel Analytical Method: EPA 8015 Modified Preparation Method: EPA 3546
Diesel Components ND mg/kg 1 10/11/10 18:45 68334-30-510/11/10 10:456.1
n-Pentacosane (S)53 %1 10/11/10 18:45 629-99-210/11/10 10:4541-119
9071 Oil and Grease Analytical Method: 9071B Preparation Method: 9071B
Oil and Grease ND mg/kg 1 10/12/10 10:0410/12/10 08:1684.6
Gasoline Range Organics Analytical Method: EPA 8015 Modified Preparation Method: EPA 5035A/5030B
Gasoline Range Organics ND mg/kg 1 10/14/10 14:20 8006-61-910/14/10 11:077.4
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)129 %1 10/14/10 14:20 460-00-410/14/10 11:0770-167
Percent Moisture Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87
Percent Moisture 17.2 %1 10/08/10 13:430.10
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/14/2010 04:05 PM Page 5 of 11
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279322
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-736
Sample:SB-203 Lab ID:9279322003 Collected:10/07/10 13:30 Received:10/07/10 15:10 Matrix:Solid
Results reported on a "dry-weight" basis
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
8015 GCS THC-Diesel Analytical Method: EPA 8015 Modified Preparation Method: EPA 3546
Diesel Components ND mg/kg 1 10/11/10 18:45 68334-30-510/11/10 10:456.5
n-Pentacosane (S)48 %1 10/11/10 18:45 629-99-210/11/10 10:4541-119
Gasoline Range Organics Analytical Method: EPA 8015 Modified Preparation Method: EPA 5035A/5030B
Gasoline Range Organics ND mg/kg 1 10/14/10 14:44 8006-61-910/14/10 11:077.0
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)144 %1 10/14/10 14:44 460-00-410/14/10 11:0770-167
Percent Moisture Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87
Percent Moisture 23.6 %1 10/08/10 13:440.10
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/14/2010 04:05 PM Page 6 of 11
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279322
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-736
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
OEXT/11444
EPA 3546
EPA 8015 Modified
8015 Solid GCSV
Associated Lab Samples:9279322001, 9279322002, 9279322003
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK:510066
Associated Lab Samples:9279322001, 9279322002, 9279322003
Matrix:Solid
Analyzed
Diesel Components mg/kg ND 5.0 10/11/10 13:43
n-Pentacosane (S)%109 41-119 10/11/10 13:43
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
510067LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
Diesel Components mg/kg 123167 74 49-113
n-Pentacosane (S)%86 41-119
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qual% RecConc.
510068MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
MSSpike
Result
9279386002
510069
MSD
Result
MSD
% Rec RPD
MSDMS
Spike
Conc.
Diesel Components mg/kg M0,R11917210-14641 53191ND14181.5
n-Pentacosane (S)%82 41-11949
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/14/2010 04:05 PM Page 7 of 11
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279322
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-736
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
GCSV/8516
9071B
9071B
9071 Oil and Grease
Associated Lab Samples:9279322001, 9279322002
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK:510292
Associated Lab Samples:9279322001, 9279322002
Matrix:Solid
Analyzed
Oil and Grease mg/kg ND 70.0 10/12/10 10:04
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
510293LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
Oil and Grease mg/kg 12301330 92 78-114
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qual% RecConc.
510294MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
MSSpike
Result
9279209003
510295
MSD
Result
MSD
% Rec RPD
MSDMS
Spike
Conc.
Oil and Grease mg/kg 1550 95 78-11493 1155010115701560
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/14/2010 04:05 PM Page 8 of 11
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279322
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-736
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
GCV/4411
EPA 5035A/5030B
EPA 8015 Modified
Gasoline Range Organics
Associated Lab Samples:9279322001, 9279322002, 9279322003
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK:511912
Associated Lab Samples:9279322001, 9279322002, 9279322003
Matrix:Solid
Analyzed
Gasoline Range Organics mg/kg ND 6.0 10/14/10 12:34
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%105 70-167 10/14/10 12:34
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
511913LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
Gasoline Range Organics mg/kg 25.125 100 70-165
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%89 70-167
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qual% RecConc.
511914MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
MSSpike
Result
9279322001
511915
MSD
Result
MSD
% Rec RPD
MSDMS
Spike
Conc.
Gasoline Range Organics mg/kg 28.1 121 47-187111 928.1ND 34.0 31.1
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%119 70-167137
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/14/2010 04:05 PM Page 9 of 11
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279322
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-736
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
PMST/3494
ASTM D2974-87
ASTM D2974-87
Dry Weight/Percent Moisture
Associated Lab Samples:9279322001, 9279322002, 9279322003
Parameter Units
Dup
Result QualifiersRPDResult
9279284001
509180SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Percent Moisture %20.1 421.0
Parameter Units
Dup
Result QualifiersRPDResult
9279226013
509181SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Percent Moisture %26.4 126.6
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/14/2010 04:05 PM Page 10 of 11
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALIFIERS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279322
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-736
DEFINITIONS
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample preparation, dilution of
the sample aliquot, or moisture content.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL - Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
S - Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (8270 listed analyte) decomposes to Azobenzene.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Pace Analytical is NELAP accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
LABORATORIES
Pace Analytical Services - CharlottePASI-C
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
Matrix spike recovery and/or matrix spike duplicate recovery was outside laboratory control limits.M0
RPD value was outside control limits.R1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/14/2010 04:05 PM Page 11 of 11
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]

Appendix D

Laboratory Reports and Chain of Custody Documentation –
Groundwater Samples
October 15, 2010
LIMS USE: FR - PAULA RICHARDSON
LIMS OBJECT ID: 9279321
9279321
Project:
Pace Project No.:
RE:
Ms. Paula Richardson
RSV-Jefferson
146 E. Milwaukee St.
Jefferson, WI 53549
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Dear Ms. Richardson:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on October 07, 2010.
The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the
most current NELAC standards, where applicable, unless otherwise narrated in the body of the
report.
Inorganic Wet Chemistry and Metals analyses were performed at our Pace Asheville laboratory and
Organic testing was performed at our Pace Huntersville laboratory unless otherwise footnoted. All
Microbiological analyses were performed at the laboratory where the samples were received.
Report revised on October 15, 2010, to include method detection limits (MDL) and J-Flags.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Erin Waters
[e-mail]
Project Manager
Enclosures
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 1 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
CERTIFICATIONS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Charlotte Certification IDs9800 Kincey Ave. Ste 100, Huntersville, NC 28078Louisiana/LELAP Certification #: 04034
New Jersey Certification #: NC012North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37706North Carolina Field Services Certification #: 5342North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 12Pennsylvania Certification #: 68-00784
South Carolina Certification #: 99006001South Carolina Drinking Water Cert. #: 99006003
Virginia Certification #: 00213Connecticut Certification #: PH-0104Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87627Kentucky UST Certification #: 84Louisiana DHH Drinking Water # LA 100031
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 2 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Lab ID Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received
9279321001 TW-102 Water 10/07/10 11:00 10/07/10 15:10
9279321002 TW-103 Water 10/07/10 11:30 10/07/10 15:10
9279321003 TW-104 Water 10/06/10 14:00 10/07/10 15:10
9279321004 TW-105 Water 10/07/10 12:30 10/07/10 15:10
9279321005 TW-106 Water 10/07/10 13:00 10/07/10 15:10
9279321006 PWW-001 Water 10/07/10 10:30 10/07/10 15:10
9279321007 TRIP BLANK Water 10/07/10 00:00 10/07/10 15:10
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 3 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Lab ID Sample ID Method
Analytes
Reported LaboratoryAnalysts
9279321001 TW-102 EPA 8260 63 PASI-CMCK
9279321002 TW-103 EPA 8260 63 PASI-CMCK
9279321003 TW-104 EPA 8260 63 PASI-CMCK
9279321004 TW-105 EPA 8260 63 PASI-CMCK
9279321005 TW-106 EPA 8260 63 PASI-CMCK
9279321006 PWW-001 EPA 8260 63 PASI-CMCK
9279321007 TRIP BLANK EPA 8260 63 PASI-CMCK
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 4 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Sample:TW-102 Lab ID:9279321001 Collected:10/07/10 11:00 Received:10/07/10 15:10 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLLimit
Report
8260 MSV Low Level Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Acetone ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 67-64-125.0 2.2
Benzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 71-43-21.0 0.25
Bromobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 108-86-11.0 0.30
Bromochloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 74-97-51.0 0.17
Bromodichloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 75-27-41.0 0.18
Bromoform ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 75-25-21.0 0.26
Bromomethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 74-83-92.0 0.29
2-Butanone (MEK)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 78-93-35.0 0.96
Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 56-23-51.0 0.25
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 108-90-71.0 0.23
Chloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 75-00-31.0 0.54
Chloroform ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 67-66-31.0 0.14
Chloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 74-87-31.0 0.11
2-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 95-49-81.0 0.35
4-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 106-43-41.0 0.31
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 96-12-85.0 2.5
Dibromochloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 124-48-11.0 0.21
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 106-93-41.0 0.27
Dibromomethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 74-95-31.0 0.21
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 95-50-11.0 0.30
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 541-73-11.0 0.24
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 106-46-71.0 0.33
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 75-71-81.0 0.21
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 75-34-31.0 0.32
1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 107-06-21.0 0.12
1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 75-35-41.0 0.56
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 156-59-21.0 0.19
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 156-60-51.0 0.49
1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 78-87-51.0 0.27
1,3-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 142-28-91.0 0.28
2,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 594-20-71.0 0.13
1,1-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 563-58-61.0 0.49
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 10061-01-51.0 0.13
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 10061-02-61.0 0.26
Diisopropyl ether ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 108-20-31.0 0.12
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 100-41-41.0 0.30
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 87-68-31.0 0.71
2-Hexanone ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 591-78-65.0 0.46
p-Isopropyltoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 99-87-61.0 0.31
Methylene Chloride ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 75-09-22.0 0.97
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 108-10-15.0 0.33
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 1634-04-41.0 0.21
Naphthalene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 91-20-31.0 0.24
Styrene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 100-42-51.0 0.26
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 630-20-61.0 0.33
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 79-34-51.0 0.40
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/15/2010 09:35 AM Page 5 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Sample:TW-102 Lab ID:9279321001 Collected:10/07/10 11:00 Received:10/07/10 15:10 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLLimit
Report
8260 MSV Low Level Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Tetrachloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 127-18-41.0 0.46
Toluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 108-88-31.0 0.26
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 87-61-61.0 0.33
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 120-82-11.0 0.35
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 71-55-61.0 0.48
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 79-00-51.0 0.29
Trichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 79-01-61.0 0.47
Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 75-69-41.0 0.20
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 96-18-41.0 0.41
Vinyl acetate ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 108-05-42.0 0.35
Vinyl chloride ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 75-01-41.0 0.62
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 179601-23-12.0 0.66
o-Xylene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:14 95-47-61.0 0.23
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)89 %1 10/13/10 14:14 460-00-470-130
Dibromofluoromethane (S)91 %1 10/13/10 14:14 1868-53-770-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)94 %1 10/13/10 14:14 17060-07-070-130
Toluene-d8 (S)91 %1 10/13/10 14:14 2037-26-570-130
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/15/2010 09:35 AM Page 6 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Sample:TW-103 Lab ID:9279321002 Collected:10/07/10 11:30 Received:10/07/10 15:10 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLLimit
Report
8260 MSV Low Level Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Acetone 2.9J ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 67-64-125.0 2.2
Benzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 71-43-21.0 0.25
Bromobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 108-86-11.0 0.30
Bromochloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 74-97-51.0 0.17
Bromodichloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 75-27-41.0 0.18
Bromoform ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 75-25-21.0 0.26
Bromomethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 74-83-92.0 0.29
2-Butanone (MEK)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 78-93-35.0 0.96
Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 56-23-51.0 0.25
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 108-90-71.0 0.23
Chloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 75-00-31.0 0.54
Chloroform 0.82J ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 67-66-31.0 0.14
Chloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 74-87-31.0 0.11
2-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 95-49-81.0 0.35
4-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 106-43-41.0 0.31
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 96-12-85.0 2.5
Dibromochloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 124-48-11.0 0.21
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 106-93-41.0 0.27
Dibromomethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 74-95-31.0 0.21
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 95-50-11.0 0.30
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 541-73-11.0 0.24
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 106-46-71.0 0.33
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 75-71-81.0 0.21
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 75-34-31.0 0.32
1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 107-06-21.0 0.12
1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 75-35-41.0 0.56
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 156-59-21.0 0.19
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 156-60-51.0 0.49
1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 78-87-51.0 0.27
1,3-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 142-28-91.0 0.28
2,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 594-20-71.0 0.13
1,1-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 563-58-61.0 0.49
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 10061-01-51.0 0.13
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 10061-02-61.0 0.26
Diisopropyl ether ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 108-20-31.0 0.12
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 100-41-41.0 0.30
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 87-68-31.0 0.71
2-Hexanone ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 591-78-65.0 0.46
p-Isopropyltoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 99-87-61.0 0.31
Methylene Chloride ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 75-09-22.0 0.97
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 108-10-15.0 0.33
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 1634-04-41.0 0.21
Naphthalene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 91-20-31.0 0.24
Styrene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 100-42-51.0 0.26
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 630-20-61.0 0.33
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 79-34-51.0 0.40
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/15/2010 09:35 AM Page 7 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Sample:TW-103 Lab ID:9279321002 Collected:10/07/10 11:30 Received:10/07/10 15:10 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLLimit
Report
8260 MSV Low Level Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Tetrachloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 127-18-41.0 0.46
Toluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 108-88-31.0 0.26
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 87-61-61.0 0.33
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 120-82-11.0 0.35
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 71-55-61.0 0.48
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 79-00-51.0 0.29
Trichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 79-01-61.0 0.47
Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 75-69-41.0 0.20
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 96-18-41.0 0.41
Vinyl acetate ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 108-05-42.0 0.35
Vinyl chloride ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 75-01-41.0 0.62
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 179601-23-12.0 0.66
o-Xylene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 14:40 95-47-61.0 0.23
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)95 %1 10/13/10 14:40 460-00-470-130
Dibromofluoromethane (S)91 %1 10/13/10 14:40 1868-53-770-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)94 %1 10/13/10 14:40 17060-07-070-130
Toluene-d8 (S)93 %1 10/13/10 14:40 2037-26-570-130
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/15/2010 09:35 AM Page 8 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Sample:TW-104 Lab ID:9279321003 Collected:10/06/10 14:00 Received:10/07/10 15:10 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLLimit
Report
8260 MSV Low Level Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Acetone 3.4J ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 67-64-125.0 2.2
Benzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 71-43-21.0 0.25
Bromobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 108-86-11.0 0.30
Bromochloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 74-97-51.0 0.17
Bromodichloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 75-27-41.0 0.18
Bromoform ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 75-25-21.0 0.26
Bromomethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 74-83-92.0 0.29
2-Butanone (MEK)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 78-93-35.0 0.96
Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 56-23-51.0 0.25
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 108-90-71.0 0.23
Chloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 75-00-31.0 0.54
Chloroform ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 67-66-31.0 0.14
Chloromethane 0.16J ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 74-87-31.0 0.11
2-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 95-49-81.0 0.35
4-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 106-43-41.0 0.31
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 96-12-85.0 2.5
Dibromochloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 124-48-11.0 0.21
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 106-93-41.0 0.27
Dibromomethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 74-95-31.0 0.21
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 95-50-11.0 0.30
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 541-73-11.0 0.24
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 106-46-71.0 0.33
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 75-71-81.0 0.21
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 75-34-31.0 0.32
1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 107-06-21.0 0.12
1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 75-35-41.0 0.56
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 156-59-21.0 0.19
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 156-60-51.0 0.49
1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 78-87-51.0 0.27
1,3-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 142-28-91.0 0.28
2,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 594-20-71.0 0.13
1,1-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 563-58-61.0 0.49
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 10061-01-51.0 0.13
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 10061-02-61.0 0.26
Diisopropyl ether ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 108-20-31.0 0.12
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 100-41-41.0 0.30
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 87-68-31.0 0.71
2-Hexanone ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 591-78-65.0 0.46
p-Isopropyltoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 99-87-61.0 0.31
Methylene Chloride ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 75-09-22.0 0.97
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 108-10-15.0 0.33
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 1634-04-41.0 0.21
Naphthalene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 91-20-31.0 0.24
Styrene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 100-42-51.0 0.26
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 630-20-61.0 0.33
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 79-34-51.0 0.40
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/15/2010 09:35 AM Page 9 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Sample:TW-104 Lab ID:9279321003 Collected:10/06/10 14:00 Received:10/07/10 15:10 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLLimit
Report
8260 MSV Low Level Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Tetrachloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 127-18-41.0 0.46
Toluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 108-88-31.0 0.26
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 87-61-61.0 0.33
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 120-82-11.0 0.35
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 71-55-61.0 0.48
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 79-00-51.0 0.29
Trichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 79-01-61.0 0.47
Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 75-69-41.0 0.20
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 96-18-41.0 0.41
Vinyl acetate ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 108-05-42.0 0.35
Vinyl chloride ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 75-01-41.0 0.62
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 179601-23-12.0 0.66
o-Xylene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:05 95-47-61.0 0.23
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)91 %1 10/13/10 15:05 460-00-470-130
Dibromofluoromethane (S)89 %1 10/13/10 15:05 1868-53-770-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)92 %1 10/13/10 15:05 17060-07-070-130
Toluene-d8 (S)94 %1 10/13/10 15:05 2037-26-570-130
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/15/2010 09:35 AM Page 10 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Sample:TW-105 Lab ID:9279321004 Collected:10/07/10 12:30 Received:10/07/10 15:10 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLLimit
Report
8260 MSV Low Level Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Acetone 2.4J ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 67-64-125.0 2.2
Benzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 71-43-21.0 0.25
Bromobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 108-86-11.0 0.30
Bromochloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 74-97-51.0 0.17
Bromodichloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 75-27-41.0 0.18
Bromoform ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 75-25-21.0 0.26
Bromomethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 74-83-92.0 0.29
2-Butanone (MEK)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 78-93-35.0 0.96
Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 56-23-51.0 0.25
Chlorobenzene 0.30J ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 108-90-71.0 0.23
Chloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 75-00-31.0 0.54
Chloroform ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 67-66-31.0 0.14
Chloromethane 0.27J ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 74-87-31.0 0.11
2-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 95-49-81.0 0.35
4-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 106-43-41.0 0.31
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 96-12-85.0 2.5
Dibromochloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 124-48-11.0 0.21
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 106-93-41.0 0.27
Dibromomethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 74-95-31.0 0.21
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 95-50-11.0 0.30
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 541-73-11.0 0.24
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 106-46-71.0 0.33
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 75-71-81.0 0.21
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 75-34-31.0 0.32
1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 107-06-21.0 0.12
1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 75-35-41.0 0.56
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 156-59-21.0 0.19
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 156-60-51.0 0.49
1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 78-87-51.0 0.27
1,3-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 142-28-91.0 0.28
2,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 594-20-71.0 0.13
1,1-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 563-58-61.0 0.49
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 10061-01-51.0 0.13
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 10061-02-61.0 0.26
Diisopropyl ether ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 108-20-31.0 0.12
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 100-41-41.0 0.30
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 87-68-31.0 0.71
2-Hexanone ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 591-78-65.0 0.46
p-Isopropyltoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 99-87-61.0 0.31
Methylene Chloride ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 75-09-22.0 0.97
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 108-10-15.0 0.33
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 1634-04-41.0 0.21
Naphthalene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 91-20-31.0 0.24
Styrene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 100-42-51.0 0.26
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 630-20-61.0 0.33
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 79-34-51.0 0.40
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/15/2010 09:35 AM Page 11 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Sample:TW-105 Lab ID:9279321004 Collected:10/07/10 12:30 Received:10/07/10 15:10 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLLimit
Report
8260 MSV Low Level Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Tetrachloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 127-18-41.0 0.46
Toluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 108-88-31.0 0.26
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 87-61-61.0 0.33
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 120-82-11.0 0.35
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 71-55-61.0 0.48
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 79-00-51.0 0.29
Trichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 79-01-61.0 0.47
Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 75-69-41.0 0.20
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 96-18-41.0 0.41
Vinyl acetate ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 108-05-42.0 0.35
Vinyl chloride ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 75-01-41.0 0.62
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 179601-23-12.0 0.66
o-Xylene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:31 95-47-61.0 0.23
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)91 %1 10/13/10 15:31 460-00-470-130
Dibromofluoromethane (S)94 %1 10/13/10 15:31 1868-53-770-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)92 %1 10/13/10 15:31 17060-07-070-130
Toluene-d8 (S)91 %1 10/13/10 15:31 2037-26-570-130
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/15/2010 09:35 AM Page 12 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Sample:TW-106 Lab ID:9279321005 Collected:10/07/10 13:00 Received:10/07/10 15:10 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLLimit
Report
8260 MSV Low Level Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Acetone 2.8J ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 67-64-125.0 2.2
Benzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 71-43-21.0 0.25
Bromobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 108-86-11.0 0.30
Bromochloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 74-97-51.0 0.17
Bromodichloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 75-27-41.0 0.18
Bromoform ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 75-25-21.0 0.26
Bromomethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 74-83-92.0 0.29
2-Butanone (MEK)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 78-93-35.0 0.96
Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 56-23-51.0 0.25
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 108-90-71.0 0.23
Chloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 75-00-31.0 0.54
Chloroform ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 67-66-31.0 0.14
Chloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 74-87-31.0 0.11
2-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 95-49-81.0 0.35
4-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 106-43-41.0 0.31
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 96-12-85.0 2.5
Dibromochloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 124-48-11.0 0.21
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 106-93-41.0 0.27
Dibromomethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 74-95-31.0 0.21
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 95-50-11.0 0.30
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 541-73-11.0 0.24
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 106-46-71.0 0.33
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 75-71-81.0 0.21
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 75-34-31.0 0.32
1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 107-06-21.0 0.12
1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 75-35-41.0 0.56
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 156-59-21.0 0.19
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 156-60-51.0 0.49
1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 78-87-51.0 0.27
1,3-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 142-28-91.0 0.28
2,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 594-20-71.0 0.13
1,1-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 563-58-61.0 0.49
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 10061-01-51.0 0.13
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 10061-02-61.0 0.26
Diisopropyl ether ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 108-20-31.0 0.12
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 100-41-41.0 0.30
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 87-68-31.0 0.71
2-Hexanone ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 591-78-65.0 0.46
p-Isopropyltoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 99-87-61.0 0.31
Methylene Chloride 2.2 ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 75-09-22.0 0.97
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 108-10-15.0 0.33
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 1634-04-41.0 0.21
Naphthalene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 91-20-31.0 0.24
Styrene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 100-42-51.0 0.26
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 630-20-61.0 0.33
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 79-34-51.0 0.40
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/15/2010 09:35 AM Page 13 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Sample:TW-106 Lab ID:9279321005 Collected:10/07/10 13:00 Received:10/07/10 15:10 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLLimit
Report
8260 MSV Low Level Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Tetrachloroethene 1.7 ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 127-18-41.0 0.46
Toluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 108-88-31.0 0.26
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 87-61-61.0 0.33
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 120-82-11.0 0.35
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 71-55-61.0 0.48
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 79-00-51.0 0.29
Trichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 79-01-61.0 0.47
Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 75-69-41.0 0.20
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 96-18-41.0 0.41
Vinyl acetate ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 108-05-42.0 0.35
Vinyl chloride ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 75-01-41.0 0.62
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 179601-23-12.0 0.66
o-Xylene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 15:56 95-47-61.0 0.23
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)93 %1 10/13/10 15:56 460-00-470-130
Dibromofluoromethane (S)92 %1 10/13/10 15:56 1868-53-770-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)93 %1 10/13/10 15:56 17060-07-070-130
Toluene-d8 (S)92 %1 10/13/10 15:56 2037-26-570-130
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/15/2010 09:35 AM Page 14 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Sample:PWW-001 Lab ID:9279321006 Collected:10/07/10 10:30 Received:10/07/10 15:10 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLLimit
Report
8260 MSV Low Level Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Acetone ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 67-64-125.0 2.2
Benzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 71-43-21.0 0.25
Bromobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 108-86-11.0 0.30
Bromochloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 74-97-51.0 0.17
Bromodichloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 75-27-41.0 0.18
Bromoform ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 75-25-21.0 0.26
Bromomethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 74-83-92.0 0.29
2-Butanone (MEK)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 78-93-35.0 0.96
Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 56-23-51.0 0.25
Chlorobenzene 0.75J ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 108-90-71.0 0.23
Chloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 75-00-31.0 0.54
Chloroform ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 67-66-31.0 0.14
Chloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 74-87-31.0 0.11
2-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 95-49-81.0 0.35
4-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 106-43-41.0 0.31
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 96-12-85.0 2.5
Dibromochloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 124-48-11.0 0.21
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 106-93-41.0 0.27
Dibromomethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 74-95-31.0 0.21
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 95-50-11.0 0.30
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 541-73-11.0 0.24
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.60J ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 106-46-71.0 0.33
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 75-71-81.0 0.21
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 75-34-31.0 0.32
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.17J ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 107-06-21.0 0.12
1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 75-35-41.0 0.56
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.47J ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 156-59-21.0 0.19
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 156-60-51.0 0.49
1,2-Dichloropropane 0.44J ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 78-87-51.0 0.27
1,3-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 142-28-91.0 0.28
2,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 594-20-71.0 0.13
1,1-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 563-58-61.0 0.49
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 10061-01-51.0 0.13
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 10061-02-61.0 0.26
Diisopropyl ether ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 108-20-31.0 0.12
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 100-41-41.0 0.30
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 87-68-31.0 0.71
2-Hexanone ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 591-78-65.0 0.46
p-Isopropyltoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 99-87-61.0 0.31
Methylene Chloride ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 75-09-22.0 0.97
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 108-10-15.0 0.33
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 1634-04-41.0 0.21
Naphthalene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 91-20-31.0 0.24
Styrene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 100-42-51.0 0.26
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 630-20-61.0 0.33
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 79-34-51.0 0.40
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/15/2010 09:35 AM Page 15 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Sample:PWW-001 Lab ID:9279321006 Collected:10/07/10 10:30 Received:10/07/10 15:10 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLLimit
Report
8260 MSV Low Level Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Tetrachloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 127-18-41.0 0.46
Toluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 108-88-31.0 0.26
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 87-61-61.0 0.33
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 120-82-11.0 0.35
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 71-55-61.0 0.48
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 79-00-51.0 0.29
Trichloroethene 0.80J ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 79-01-61.0 0.47
Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 75-69-41.0 0.20
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 96-18-41.0 0.41
Vinyl acetate ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 108-05-42.0 0.35
Vinyl chloride ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 75-01-41.0 0.62
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 179601-23-12.0 0.66
o-Xylene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 16:22 95-47-61.0 0.23
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)91 %1 10/13/10 16:22 460-00-470-130
Dibromofluoromethane (S)88 %1 10/13/10 16:22 1868-53-770-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)90 %1 10/13/10 16:22 17060-07-070-130
Toluene-d8 (S)92 %1 10/13/10 16:22 2037-26-570-130
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/15/2010 09:35 AM Page 16 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Sample:TRIP BLANK Lab ID:9279321007 Collected:10/07/10 00:00 Received:10/07/10 15:10 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLLimit
Report
8260 MSV Low Level Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Acetone 5.0J ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 67-64-125.0 2.2
Benzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 71-43-21.0 0.25
Bromobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 108-86-11.0 0.30
Bromochloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 74-97-51.0 0.17
Bromodichloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 75-27-41.0 0.18
Bromoform ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 75-25-21.0 0.26
Bromomethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 74-83-92.0 0.29
2-Butanone (MEK)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 78-93-35.0 0.96
Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 56-23-51.0 0.25
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 108-90-71.0 0.23
Chloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 75-00-31.0 0.54
Chloroform ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 67-66-31.0 0.14
Chloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 74-87-31.0 0.11
2-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 95-49-81.0 0.35
4-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 106-43-41.0 0.31
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 96-12-85.0 2.5
Dibromochloromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 124-48-11.0 0.21
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 106-93-41.0 0.27
Dibromomethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 74-95-31.0 0.21
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 95-50-11.0 0.30
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 541-73-11.0 0.24
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 106-46-71.0 0.33
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 75-71-81.0 0.21
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 75-34-31.0 0.32
1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 107-06-21.0 0.12
1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 75-35-41.0 0.56
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 156-59-21.0 0.19
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 156-60-51.0 0.49
1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 78-87-51.0 0.27
1,3-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 142-28-91.0 0.28
2,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 594-20-71.0 0.13
1,1-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 563-58-61.0 0.49
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 10061-01-51.0 0.13
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 10061-02-61.0 0.26
Diisopropyl ether ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 108-20-31.0 0.12
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 100-41-41.0 0.30
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 87-68-31.0 0.71
2-Hexanone ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 591-78-65.0 0.46
p-Isopropyltoluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 99-87-61.0 0.31
Methylene Chloride 0.99J ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 75-09-22.0 0.97
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 108-10-15.0 0.33
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 1634-04-41.0 0.21
Naphthalene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 91-20-31.0 0.24
Styrene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 100-42-51.0 0.26
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 630-20-61.0 0.33
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 79-34-51.0 0.40
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/15/2010 09:35 AM Page 17 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Sample:TRIP BLANK Lab ID:9279321007 Collected:10/07/10 00:00 Received:10/07/10 15:10 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLLimit
Report
8260 MSV Low Level Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Tetrachloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 127-18-41.0 0.46
Toluene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 108-88-31.0 0.26
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 87-61-61.0 0.33
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 120-82-11.0 0.35
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 71-55-61.0 0.48
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 79-00-51.0 0.29
Trichloroethene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 79-01-61.0 0.47
Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 75-69-41.0 0.20
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 96-18-41.0 0.41
Vinyl acetate ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 108-05-42.0 0.35
Vinyl chloride ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 75-01-41.0 0.62
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 179601-23-12.0 0.66
o-Xylene ND ug/L 1 10/13/10 13:49 95-47-61.0 0.23
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)94 %1 10/13/10 13:49 460-00-470-130
Dibromofluoromethane (S)91 %1 10/13/10 13:49 1868-53-770-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)91 %1 10/13/10 13:49 17060-07-070-130
Toluene-d8 (S)93 %1 10/13/10 13:49 2037-26-570-130
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/15/2010 09:35 AM Page 18 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
MSV/12624
EPA 8260
EPA 8260
8260 MSV Low Level
Associated Lab Samples:9279321001, 9279321002, 9279321003, 9279321004, 9279321005, 9279321006, 9279321007
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK:510996
Associated Lab Samples:9279321001, 9279321002, 9279321003, 9279321004, 9279321005, 9279321006, 9279321007
Matrix:Water
Analyzed
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
1,1-Dichloropropene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L ND 5.0 10/13/10 10:44
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
1,3-Dichloropropane ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
2,2-Dichloropropane ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
2-Butanone (MEK)ug/L ND 5.0 10/13/10 10:44
2-Chlorotoluene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
2-Hexanone ug/L ND 5.0 10/13/10 10:44
4-Chlorotoluene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ug/L ND 5.0 10/13/10 10:44
Acetone ug/L ND 25.0 10/13/10 10:44
Benzene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Bromobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Bromochloromethane ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Bromodichloromethane ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Bromoform ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Bromomethane ug/L ND 2.0 10/13/10 10:44
Carbon tetrachloride ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Chlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Chloroethane ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Chloroform ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Chloromethane ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Dibromochloromethane ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Dibromomethane ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Diisopropyl ether ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Ethylbenzene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/15/2010 09:35 AM Page 19 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK:510996
Associated Lab Samples:9279321001, 9279321002, 9279321003, 9279321004, 9279321005, 9279321006, 9279321007
Matrix:Water
Analyzed
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
m&p-Xylene ug/L ND 2.0 10/13/10 10:44
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Methylene Chloride ug/L 1.5J 2.0 10/13/10 10:44
Naphthalene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
o-Xylene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
p-Isopropyltoluene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Styrene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Tetrachloroethene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Toluene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Trichloroethene ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
Vinyl acetate ug/L ND 2.0 10/13/10 10:44
Vinyl chloride ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/10 10:44
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)%92 70-130 10/13/10 10:44
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%93 70-130 10/13/10 10:44
Dibromofluoromethane (S)%95 70-130 10/13/10 10:44
Toluene-d8 (S)%93 70-130 10/13/10 10:44
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
510997LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 49.650 99 70-130
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L 45.150 90 70-130
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 45.450 91 70-130
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L 41.450 83 70-130
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L 47.150 94 70-130
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/L 47.150 94 70-132
1,1-Dichloropropene ug/L 42.250 84 70-130
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/L 49.850 100 70-135
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/L 47.450 95 70-130
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/L 48.650 97 70-134
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L 48.950 98 70-130
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/L 48.050 96 70-130
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 48.150 96 70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L 46.550 93 70-130
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 38.150 76 70-130
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 46.050 92 70-130
1,3-Dichloropropane ug/L 47.550 95 70-130
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 48.250 96 70-130
2,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 38.150 76 58-145
2-Butanone (MEK)ug/L 83.9100 84 70-145
2-Chlorotoluene ug/L 47.550 95 70-130
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/15/2010 09:35 AM Page 20 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
510997LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
2-Hexanone ug/L 98.3100 98 70-144
4-Chlorotoluene ug/L 50.650 101 70-130
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ug/L 84.4100 84 70-140
Acetone ug/L 77.9100 78 50-175
Benzene ug/L 50.050 100 70-130
Bromobenzene ug/L 44.350 89 70-130
Bromochloromethane ug/L 45.250 90 70-130
Bromodichloromethane ug/L 40.650 81 70-130
Bromoform ug/L 45.950 92 70-130
Bromomethane ug/L 45.350 91 54-130
Carbon tetrachloride ug/L 45.850 92 70-132
Chlorobenzene ug/L 49.450 99 70-130
Chloroethane ug/L 44.250 88 64-134
Chloroform ug/L 44.850 90 70-130
Chloromethane ug/L 39.950 80 64-130
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 43.750 87 70-131
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 39.950 80 70-130
Dibromochloromethane ug/L 47.050 94 70-130
Dibromomethane ug/L 43.750 87 70-131
Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/L 38.550 77 56-130
Diisopropyl ether ug/L 46.950 94 70-130
Ethylbenzene ug/L 52.550 105 70-130
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/L 49.150 98 70-130
m&p-Xylene ug/L 103100 103 70-130
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/L 44.150 88 70-130
Methylene Chloride ug/L 39.950 80 63-130
Naphthalene ug/L 55.150 110 70-138
o-Xylene ug/L 51.250 102 70-130
p-Isopropyltoluene ug/L 50.050 100 70-130
Styrene ug/L 47.650 95 70-130
Tetrachloroethene ug/L 54.550 109 70-130
Toluene ug/L 44.450 89 70-130
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 44.650 89 70-130
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 39.850 80 70-132
Trichloroethene ug/L 46.150 92 70-130
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L 49.350 99 62-133
Vinyl acetate ug/L 90.7100 91 66-157
Vinyl chloride ug/L 42.150 84 69-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)%92 70-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%97 70-130
Dibromofluoromethane (S)%91 70-130
Toluene-d8 (S)%92 70-130
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/15/2010 09:35 AM Page 21 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qual% RecConc.
510998MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
MSSpike
Result
9279353012
510999
MSD
Result
MSD
% Rec RPD RPD
Max
MSDMS
Spike
Conc.
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/L 3 3050.3 51.9
Benzene ug/L 50 98 70-148101 2 30503.0 52.1 53.3
Chlorobenzene ug/L 50 107 70-146109 2 3050ND53.4 54.5
Toluene ug/L 50 102 70-155101 0 3050ND50.9 50.7
Trichloroethene ug/L 3 3048.1 49.7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)%90 70-13089
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%91 70-13097
Dibromofluoromethane (S)%90 70-13086
Toluene-d8 (S)%90 70-13089
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/15/2010 09:35 AM Page 22 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALIFIERS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
9279321
GERERAL STEEL DRUM 10-739
DEFINITIONS
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample preparation, dilution of
the sample aliquot, or moisture content.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL - Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
S - Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (8270 listed analyte) decomposes to Azobenzene.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Pace Analytical is NELAP accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
LABORATORIES
Pace Analytical Services - CharlottePASI-C
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 10/15/2010 09:35 AM Page 23 of 23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]