9231_BrownfieldRdCDLF_CQA_Phase2A_Stage2_DIN26538_201700706

July 5, 2016

Ms. Patricia Backus, P.E.
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR Division of Waste Management
217 W. Jones Street
Raleigh, North Carolina

RE: Construction Quality Assurance Report
Brownfield Road C&D Landfill (Phase 2A – Stage 2 Construction)
Solid Waste Permit No. 92-31
Raleigh, North Carolina

Dear Ms. Backus:

On behalf of Wake Reclamation, LLC, Smith Gardner, Inc. (S+G) would like to submit for your
review the (2) enclosed Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) Reports (one (1) hard copy and one
(1) electronic) for the Phase 2A – Stage 2 Construction at the Brownfield Road C&D Landfill. An
updated capacity study for the site to reflect airspace lost due to rock during construction has
been submitted with the Phase 2B Permit to Construct Application1.

Closure Event No. 1 took place simultaneously with Phase 2A –Stage 2 construction. A separate
certification report for Closure Event No. 1 will be submitted within the month and the attached
financial assurance has been updated to represent both construction and closure activities.

Should you have any questions or require clarification, please contact us at [phone] or by
email below.

Sincerely,
SMITH GARDNER, INC.

Carter T. Shore, E.I. Stacey A. Smith, P.E.
Staff Engineer, ext. 142 Project Manager, ext. 127
[e-mail] [e-mail]
cts/sas

Attachments: Financial Assurance – Brownfield Road CDLF

Cc: Donald Plessinger, Waste Industries USA, Inc.
David Pepper, Waste Industries USA, Inc.
Jim Poole, Insure-NC

1 Brownfield Road C&D Landfill – Phase 2B Permit to Construct Application by S+G dated October
2015.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
7/5/2016

This page intentionally left blank.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
DATE:27-Jun-16
BY:CTS
Brownfield Road C&D Landfill (NC Solid Waste Permit No. 92-31)
Engineer's Closure Construction Cost Estimate
Item Item Contractor
No.Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Price Comments
Closure Area (Horizontal Plan) ---->AC 30.2
1.0 Pre-Construction Subtotal $45,200.00
1.1 Construction Documents & Bidding AC 30 $15k + $1k/AC $45,200.00 S+G Estimate
2.0 Construction $1,980,516.00 Reference 1
2.1 Surveys and Layout AC 30 $250.00 $7,550.00 S+G Historical Estimate
2.2 Mobilization AC 30 $1,100.00 $33,220.00 Based on 2016 Closure Event No. 1 Costs
2.3 Site Preparation (repairs to intermediate cover layer)AC 30 $2,100.00 $63,420.00 Based on 2016 Closure Event No. 1 Costs
2.4 18" On-site Low Permeability Soil CY 73,084 $8.00 $584,672.00 S+G Historical Estimate
2.5 18" Vegetative Support Layer CY 73,084 $3.50 $255,794.00 S+G Historical Estimate
2.6 Landfill Gas Venting System AC 30 $3,000.00 $90,600.00 Based on 2016 Closure Event No. 1 Costs
2.7 Cap Drainage Structures (berms, piping, etc.)AC 30 $27,000.00 $815,400.00 Based on 2016 Closure Event No. 1 Costs
2.8 Erosion & Sediment Control (grading, silt fence, maintenance, etc.)AC 30 $1,800.00 $54,360.00 S+G Historical Estimate
2.9 Revegetation AC 30 $2,500.00 $75,500.00 S+G Historical Estimate
3.0 Quality Assurance, Certification, & Deed Notation $181,670.00
3.1 Field Monitoring AC 30 $3,000.00 $90,600.00 S+G Estimate
3.2 Laboratory Testing AC 30 $2,500.00 $75,500.00 S+G Estimate
3.3 Engineering Certification AC 30 $5k + $250/AC $12,550.00 S+G Estimate
3.4 Surveying and Deed Notation AC 30 $100.00 $3,020.00 S+G Historical Estimate
4.0 Miscellaneous Costs to Close $37,750.00
4.1 Erosion and Stormwater Control (outside landfill footprint)AC 30 $1,000.00 $30,200.00 S+G Historical Estimate
4.2 Engineering and Reporting AC 30 $250.00 $7,550.00 S+G Historical Estimate
5.0 Total Closure Costs
Construction Estimate ----->$2,245,136 (2016$)
Cost per Acre ---->$74,342
Total Estimate ---->$2,245,136 (2016$) (See Notes 1 & 2)
Notes:
1.  All costs are presented in current dollars and should be increased at an inflation rate prescribed by the NCDENR Division of Waste Management per http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sw/financialassurance
     if additional review is not performed annually.
2. This ESTIMATE has been prepared for financial assurance purposes only and shall not be considered a replacement for an actual bid from a licensed contractor and is considered acceptable
within a +/- 10% of the Total Estimate value.
References:
1. Wake Reclamatinon, LLC., Brownfield Road C&D Landfill, Phase 2B Permit to Construction, October 2015, prepared by Smith Gardner, Inc.
Denotes values calculated in spreadsheet.
NOTE: Estimate for purpose of permitting only. Actual
estimate will be based on actual constructed area.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
2 of 2 Closure-Post Closure.xls
DATE:27-Jun-16
BY:CTS
Brownfield Road C&D Landfill (NC Solid Waste Permit No. 92-31)
Engineer's Post Closure Cost Estimate
Item Quantity Unit Comments
Groundwater Monitoring
Monitoring wells 9 wells Reference 1
Surface water point 3 points Reference 1
Sampling frequency 2 events Reference 1
Field sampling, collection, and shipping.$800 per event S+G estimate
Laboratory Analysis $350 per well S+G estimate
Data review, statistics, and reporting $2,000 per event S+G estimate
Maintenance and repair $100 per well S+G estimate
Subtotal Cost $14,900 per year Compares to current pricing by Golder
Landfill Gas Management
Control System Vents 37 vents Pro-rated @ one (1) per one (1) acre
Sub-Surface Perimeter Monitoring Probes 10 probes Per Ref. 1
Control system monitoring, maintenance and repair $100 per vent per year S+G estimate
Semi-Annual Perimeter Monitoring $150 per probe per year S+G estimate
Subtotal Cost $5,200 per year Averaged over post-closure period
Final Cover Management
Area of maintenance 36.7 acres Extends to area immediately around landfill.
Mowing $200 per acre S+G estimate
Erosion and sediment control maintenance $200 per acre S+G estimate
Topdressing (seed & fertilizer)$150 per acre S+G estimate
Vector and rodent control $10 per acre S+G estimate
Maintenance Mobilization $2,000 per year S+G estimate
Subtotal Cost $22,552 per year
Administration, Inspections, and Reporting
Administration and record keeping $1,000 per year S+G estimate
Inspection $1,000 per year S+G estimate
Miscellaneous engineering $1,500 per year S+G estimate
Subtotal Cost $3,500 per year
Subtotal Post-Closure Costs
Estimated Average Annual Costs $46,152 per year (2016$)
Number of Years for Post-Closure 30 years
Cost per Acre $1,257.55 per year
Subtotal Post Closure Costs $1,384,560 (2016$) (See Notes 1 & 2)
Potential Assessment and Corrective (Remedial) Action
Minimum amount required by NCDENR Division of Waste Management $1,000,000 lump sum Regulatory requirement (G.S. 130A-295.2 (h1))
Subtotal Remedial Cost $1,000,000 lump sum
Total Post Closure and Remedial Costs $2,384,560 (2016$) (See Notes 1 & 2)
Total Closure, Post Closure, and Remedial Costs $4,629,696 (2016$) (See Notes 1 & 2)
Notes:
1.  All costs are presented in current dollars and should be increased at an inflation rate prescribed by the NCDENR Division of Waste Management
per http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sw/financialassurance if additional review is not performed annually.
2. This ESTIMATE has been prepared for financial assurance purposes only and shall not be considered a replacement for an actual bid from a licensed contractor and is considered acceptable
within a +/- 10% of the Total Estimate value.
References:
1. Wake Reclamatinon, LLC., Brownfield Road C&D Landfill, Phase 2B Permit to Construction, October 2015, prepared by Smith Gardner, Inc.
Denotes values calculated in spreadsheet.
NOTE: Estimate for purpose of permitting only. Actual
estimate will be based on actual constructed area.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

Construction Quality Assurance Report

Brownfield Road C&D Landfill - Phase 2A Stage 2
Raleigh, North Carolina

Prepared for:

Wake Reclamation, LLC
(A Subsidiary of Waste Industries USA, Inc.)
Raleigh, North Carolina

June 2016

Prepared by:

© 2016 Smith Gardner, Inc.
This document is intended for the sole use of the client for which it was prepared and
for the purpose agreed upon by the client and Smith Gardner, Inc.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
This page intentionally left blank.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

Construction Quality Assurance Report

Brownfield Road C&D Landfill Phase 2A Stage 2
Raleigh, North Carolina

Prepared For:
Wake Reclamation, LLC
(A Subsidiary of Waste Industries USA, Inc.)
Raleigh, North Carolina

S+G Project No. BROWNFIELD-16-1

June 2016

Carter T. Shore, E.I.
Staff Engineer

Stacey A. Smith, P.E.
Senior Engineer
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
7/5/2016
This page intentionally left blank.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

Brownfield Road C&D Landfill Phase 2A Stage 2 Construction Quality Assurance Report
June 2016 Table of Contents Page i
Brownfield Road C&D Landfill Phase 2A Stage 2
Raleigh, North Carolina

Construction Quality Assurance Report

Table of Contents
Page

1.0 OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................. 1
2.1 General .................................................................................................................... 1
2.2 Reference Documents ............................................................................................ 1
2.3 Project Participants ................................................................................................ 2
2.3.1 Owner .......................................................................................................... 2
2.3.2 Engineer/CQA Engineer .............................................................................. 2
2.3.3 CQA Testing - Earthwork & Construction Monitoring ................................ 2
2.3.4 Contractor ................................................................................................... 2
2.3.5 Owner’s Surveyor ........................................................................................ 3
3.0 SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ..................................................................... 3
3.1 Well Abandonment .................................................................................................. 3
3.2 Site Preparation ...................................................................................................... 3
3.3 Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures ....................................................... 3
3.4 Excavation, Embankment, and Rock Removal ....................................................... 4
3.5 Prepared Subgrade ................................................................................................. 4
4.0 CQA PROGRAM ................................................................................................................ 4
4.1 Scope of Services .................................................................................................... 4
5.0 EARTHWORK CQA ........................................................................................................... 5
6.0 MODIFICATIONS .............................................................................................................. 5
7.0 PROJECT CERTIFICATION ............................................................................................... 6
7.1 Engineer’s Certification .......................................................................................... 6
7.2 Geologist’s Certification .......................................................................................... 6

FIGURES
Figure 1 Limits of Certification
Figure 2 Subgrade As-Built

TABLES
Table 1 Summary of Material Control and Record Tests - Structural Fill

APPENDICES
Appendix A Reference Documents (Permit)
Appendix B Photographic Log
Appendix C Subgrade Inspection Report
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

Brownfield Road C&D Landfill Phase 2A Stage 2 Construction Quality Assurance Report
June 2016 Table of Contents Page ii
Table of Contents (Cont.)

Appendix D Well Abandonment Records
Appendix E Meeting Minutes
Appendix F Earthwork CQA Data
CQA Test Results - Record Tests
CQA Test Results - Control Tests
Appendix G Field Orders

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

Brownfield Road C&D Landfill Phase 2A Stage 2 Construction Quality Assurance Report
June 2016 Page 1
1.0 OVERVIEW
This Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) Report has been prepared to document the CQA
activities performed during the construction of Phase 2A Stage 2 of the Brownfield Road
Construction and Demolition (C&D) Landfill. The landfill facility is located on Brownfield Road
in Raleigh, North Carolina and is owned and operated by Wake Reclamation, LLC under North
Carolina Solid Waste Permit No. 92-31. A Permit to Construct for Phase 2A (including Phase 2A
Stage 2) was issued by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management (NCDENR-DWM) on March 20, 2012.

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 General
Phase 2A Stage 2 is a 7.5 acre C&D landfill unit. The construction documents were
prepared by Smith Gardner, Inc. (S+G). The subgrade was constructed using soils
obtained from on-site sources located within the limits of the facility. In addition to the
subgrade, the Phase 2A Stage 2 design also includes associated perimeter berms and
erosion and sedimentation control (E&SC) measures.

2.2 Reference Documents
Phase 2A Stage 2 was constructed in accordance with the following documents :

Permit To Construct - Brownfield Road C&D Landfill - Phase 2A Stage 2:
Permit to Construct issued by NCDENR-DWM on March 20, 2012 (copy provided
in Appendix A)).

Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan for Brownfield Road C&D Landfill -
Phase 2A Stage 2 Construction & Closure Event No. 1, submitted by Smith
Gardner, Inc., January 2016, to update previous permits, as follows:

• Permit S#2148-A3 submitted by Smith Gardner, Inc., January 2016.
Approved by Wake County Environmental Services Sedimentation &
Erosion Control on February 3, 2016

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

Brownfield Road C&D Landfill Phase 2A Stage 2 Construction Quality Assurance Report
June 2016 Page 2
2.3 Project Participants
The following parties were involved in the construction and CQA of Phase 2A Cell 2:

2.3.1 Owner
Wake Reclamation, LLC
2600 Brownfield Road
Raleigh, NC27610
Phone: [phone]

Contact: Donald Plessinger, Landfill Manager

2.3.2 Engineer/CQA Engineer
Smith Gardner, Inc. (S+G)
14 N. Boylan Ave.
Raleigh, NC 27603
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Contacts: Stacey A. Smith, P.E., Senior Engineer
Carter T. Shore, E.I., Staff Engineer

2.3.3 CQA Testing - Earthwork & Construction Monitoring
Geotechnics (Soil Testing)
2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Contacts: Michael Smith, Regional Manager
Aaron Smith, Field Technician

2.3.4 Contractor
Baxter Johnson Contracting (BJC)
PO Box 33343
Raleigh, NC 27636
Phone: [phone]

Contacts: Brady Johnson, President
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

Brownfield Road C&D Landfill Phase 2A Stage 2 Construction Quality Assurance Report
June 2016 Page 3
Brad Murray, Site Superintendent

2.3.5 Owner’s Surveyor
Surveying Solutions, PC
PO Box 376
Louisburg, NC 27549
Phone: [phone]

Contact: Dwayne Kroeze, PLS

3.0 SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
Major elements of the project are discussed below. Photos documenting the construction of
Phase 2A Cell 2 can be found in Appendix C. Prior to BJC beginning work, a project
Pre-Construction Meeting was held on January 19, 2016.

3.1 Well Abandonment
A total of ten wells were abandoned1 in relation to the construction of Phase 2A – Stage
2. Four wells (G-4, G-18, G-19, and G-22) were located within the cell footprint. One well
(G-15) was located in the future Phase 2B area but had be irreparably damaged and was
therefore abandoned. Five wells (P-15, P-16, UD-2, UD-5, and Test Well 40) within the
southern stockpile and sediment basin footprint were abandoned.

3.2 Site Preparation
Construction of Phase 2A Stage 2 began on January 26, 2016 with the surveying/staking
of the limits of construction and the initiation of site preparation activities by BJC.

3.3 Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures
The construction of erosion and sedimentation control measures took place in
conjunction with project activities and under the site permits issued by Wake County
Erosion and Sedimentation Control Services (Appendix A). Permanent and temporary
drainage channels were added as areas were brought to grade. Once areas reached
final grade, the areas were matted and vegetated in accordance with project
requirements.

1 Phase 2A – Stage 2 Well Abandonment reports by S+G submitted to NCDEQ dated February 29, 2016 and
May 2, 2016
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

Brownfield Road C&D Landfill Phase 2A Stage 2 Construction Quality Assurance Report
June 2016 Page 4

3.4 Excavation, Embankment, and Rock Removal
The work area was cleared and grubbed. Afterwards, excavation and stockpiling
activities were performed. Excavated materials including stripped topsoil and structural
fill were identified and separated. Topsoil was taken to the stockpile area for later use
by BJC on the closure area or future use as daily/intermediate cover by the Landfill. The
soils within the Phase 2A Stage 2 footprint identified for use as structural fill were
excavated and placed and compacted where needed.

Per the Wake County approved erosion and sedimentation control design, the sediment
basin in the stockpile area to the south of Phase 2A Cell 2 was constructed before
excavation of Phase 2A – Stage 2 commenced. Construction of the eastern berm of
Phase 2A – Stage 2 was completed in conjunction with cell excavation. The drainage
channels were built as construction on their respective areas progressed. The access
road for Phase 2A Stage 2 was constructed in conjunction with berm and excavation
activities.

Upon completion of construction, Mr. Kroeze performed the record survey, and Madeline
German, P.G. from S+G conducted a post-construction subgrade inspection. As
documented in Ms. German’s report (Appendix C) no adverse conditions were observed.

3.5 Prepared Subgrade
The upper two feet of subgrade consists of soil types ML and CL, meeting the
requirements set forth in 15A NCAC 13B .0540(2)(b). Subgrade was inspected visually as
construction took place.

4.0 CQA PROGRAM
4.1 Scope of Services
In satisfying the requirements of the Project CQA Manual for Phase 2A Stage 2, the
following activities were performed:

• Observation and documentation of construction of prepared subgrade and
structural fill.
• Field and/or laboratory testing of embankment material.
• Review of submittals from the Contractor for conformance with project
specifications and CQA requirements.
• Review/preparation of record drawings.
• Preparation of the final CQA report.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

Brownfield Road C&D Landfill Phase 2A Stage 2 Construction Quality Assurance Report
June 2016 Page 5
5.0 EARTHWORK CQA
The criteria for construction of embankment per the project specifications included the
following:

Materials: SP, SW, SM, SC, ML, or CL (ASTM D 2488) with no topsoil or
other deleterious material and no stones or rocks in excess
of one half the lift thickness as compacted;
Density: 100% for Embankment beneath structures and roads;
95% for embankment, backfill around structures, and backfill
in pipe trenches (ASTM D 698);

Moisture Content:

As necessary for compaction; and

Lift Thickness:

8-inch max. (compacted).

The number and results of material control and record tests performed on the structural fill are
summarized in Table 1. Other tests performed on an on-going basis during construction
included visual classification of soils (ASTM D 2488) and monitoring of loose lift thickness. Note
that the number of tests required was based on an approximate quantity of 17,500 CY of
embankment material placed (in-place measure). The results of field and laboratory testing of
structural fill can be found in Appendix D.

6.0 MODIFICATIONS
During construction, it is typically necessary to make modifications to the design and
construction documents to accommodate field conditions and/or to improve constructability
based on practical considerations.

As anticipated, areas with rippable rock were encountered. These areas were able to be
excavated. However, unrippable rock was encountered in two locations on the southern slope of
the cell. After two weeks of using a hydraulic hammer the majority of the rock was removed. A
field order (Appendix G) was issued for rock that remained in place to be covered with soil to
maintain the regulatory separation of four (4) feet between rock with the upper two (2) feet of
separation being the prepared subgrade to satisfy the requirements of 15A NCAC 13B
.0540(2)(b). Based upon the as-built survey data, total airspace lost is 26,128 CY.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

Brownfield Road C&D Landfill Phase 2A Stage 2 Construction Quality Assurance Report
June 2016 Page 6
7.0 PROJECT CERTIFICATION
7.1 Engineer’s Certification
Based on the observations and results of the CQA program documented herein, it is our
professional opinion that the construction of Phase 2A Stage 2 of the Brownfield Road
C&D Landfill was completed in accordance with the following:

i. The Project CQA Manual;
ii. The conditions of the Permit to Construct Phase 2A Stage 2; and
iii. Acceptable engineering practices.

Stacey A. Smith, P.E.
Senior Engineer

7.2 Geologist’s Certification
Based on my inspection of the completed Phase 2 - Stage 2A Subgrade at the Brownfield
Road C&D Landfill Facility, I certify no unusual geologic conditions were encountered.
Rock type at the facility is primarily granite or weathered granite. Rock encountered
during construction was either excavated or covered with four (4) feet of soil to comply
with 15A NCAC 13B .0540.

Madeline M. German, P.G.
Hydrogeologist

SMITH GARDNER, INC.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
7/5/2016
7/5/2016
Brownfield Road Construction Demolition Landfill
Phase 2A Stage 2 Construction
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF MATERIAL CONTROL
AND RECORD TESTS
STRUCTURAL FILL
1 of 1
SMITH GARDNER, INC.Table 1 - Structural Fill CQA Report Table BROWNFIELD-16-1
Control Tests
Units -----% Std. Proctor %
Test Method ASTM D 698 ASTM D 69381 ASTM D 69382
Required Test Frequency 5,000 CY per each soil
20,000 ft2 per lift & 1 per
500 LF of Berms (<200 ft.
base width) (+/- 1 Per 500
CY)
20,000 ft2 per lift & 1 per
500 LF of Berms (<200 ft.
base width) (+/- 1 Per 500
CY)
No. of Tests Required 4 35 35
No. of Tests Performed 8 39 39
Specified Value -----> 95% Std. Proctor As Required for Density
Minimum Value -----95.0 % Opt.
Maximum Value -----103.4 % Opt.
Average Value -----98.1 % Opt.
Quantity of Structural Fill (In-Place):17,500 CY
Notes:
1. Nuclear density values verified periodically by sand cone (ASTM D 1556), rubber balloon (ASTM D 2167), and/or drive cylinder (ASTM D
2937) test methods.
2. Nuclear moisture values verified periodically by oven (ASTM D 2216), microwave oven (ASTM D 4643), and/or direct heating (ASTM D
4959) test methods.
Record Tests
Property
Moisture-Density
Relationship (Proctor)In-Place Density In-Place Moisture Content
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

This page intentionally left blank.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

Figures

Construction Quality Assurance Report
Brownfield Road C&D Landfill Phase 2A Stage 2
Raleigh, North Carolina

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

This page intentionally left blank.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
DRAWN:APPROVED:SCALE:DATE:PROJECT NO.:FIGURE NO.:FILE NAME:
PREPARED FOR:PREPARED BY:
SMITH
14 N. Boylan Avenue, Raleigh NC 27603
NC LIC. NO. C-0828 (ENGINEERING)
919.828.0577
GARDNER+
G:
\
C
A
D
\
W
C
A

B
r
o
w
n
f
i
e
l
d
\
B
r
o
w
n
f
i
e
l
d

1
6
-
1
\
s
h
e
e
t
s
\
W
I
-
A
1
1
8
3
.
d
w
g
-

6
/
2
4
/
2
0
1
6

1
2
:
0
7

P
M
© 2016 Smith Gardner, Inc.
WAKE RECLAMATION, LLC
BROWNFIELD ROAD C&D LANDFILL
PHASE 2A STAGE 2
LIMITS OF CERTIFICATION
T.R.S.AS SHOWN BROWNFIELD 14-1 1 WI-A1183Jun 2016
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

This page intentionally left blank.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Do
c
u
S
i
g
n

E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e

I
D
:

1
1
8
F
5
3
B
4
-
0
D
6
5
-
4
E
4
2
-
8
1
C
6
-
4
8
A
C
F
6
E
9
F
7
F
9
Do
c
u
S
i
g
n

E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e

I
D
:

1
1
8
F
5
3
B
4
-
0
D
6
5
-
4
E
4
2
-
8
1
C
6
-
4
8
A
C
F
6
E
9
F
7
F
9

Appendix A
Reference Documents

Construction Quality Assurance Report
Brownfield Road C&D Landfill Phase 2A Stage 2
Raleigh, North Carolina

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

This page intentionally left blank.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

Facility Permit No: 92-31
Material Recovery C&D Landfill
Permit to Construct and Operate
March 20, 2012
Doc ID: 16327
Page 1 of 16
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue Dexter R. Matthews Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary

1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Telephone [phone] \ Internet: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sw

An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer – Printed on Dual Purpose Paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
SOLID WASTE SECTION

CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION LANDFILL FACILITY
Permit No. 92-31

MATERIAL RECOVERY, LLC
and WCA WASTE SYSTEMS, INC., wholly owned subsidiaries of
WCA WASTE CORPORATION
are all hereby issued a

PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT
MATERIAL RECOVERY C&D LANDFILL
Phase 2A, and a

PERMIT TO OPERATE
MATERIAL RECOVERY C&D LANDFILL
Phase 1 (Cells A, B, and C), and Phase 2A (Cell 1)

Located at 2600 Brown Field Road, southeast of Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina, in accordance
with Article 9, Chapter 130A, of the General Statutes of North Carolina and all rules promulgated
thereunder and subject to the conditions set forth in this permit. The legal description of the site is
identified on the deeds recorded for this property listed in Attachment No. 1 of this permit.

Edward F. Mussler, III, P.E.,
Permitting Branch Supervisor
Solid Waste Section
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Facility Permit No: 92-31
Material Recovery C&D Landfill
Permit to Construct and Operate
March 20, 2012
Doc ID: 16327
Page 2 of 16

ATTACHMENT 1

PART I: PERMITTING HISTORY

Permit Type Date Issued Doc ID
Site Suitability Approval Letter January 24, 2003 10050
Original Issue PTC (Phase 1 – Cells A, B, & C) January 31, 2003 3232
PTO Phase 1, Cell A October 1, 2003 10050
PTO Modification - New franchise / Wood waste
processing area added
February 18, 2005 3600
PTO–Phase 1, Cell B May 23, 2006 230
PTO– Phase 1, Cell C, and ownership change January 28, 2008 3612
PTC Phase 2A January 28, 2011 12346
PTO – 5 year amendment Phase 1, Cells A, B,
and C
January 28, 2011 12346
PTO – Phase 2A, Cell 1 March 20, 2012 16327

1. In 2003, a Permit to Construct for Phase 1, and Permit to Operate for Phase 1 Cell A
were issued to Material Recovery, LLC, owned by MRR Southern, LLC. The Permit to
Construct was recorded on February 14, 2003, at Book 9914, Pages 701 – 720 in the
Wake County Register of Deeds.

2. On or about April 5, 2005, business entities which were wholly owned by WCA Waste
Corporation purchased four solid waste management facilities in North Carolina owned
by MRR Southern, LLC, including the construction and demolition waste landfill
permitted to Material Recovery, LLC. Subsequent to the purchase of the facility, WCA
obtained a franchise for the landfill from Wake County and applied for the permit to
operate the facility to be re-issued to WCA Waste Systems, Inc. and Material Recovery,
LLC. During this period, WCA continued to operate the landfill as previously
permitted to Material Recovery, LLC. The permit that approved the ownership change
was issued in January 2008.

PART II: LIST OF DOCUMENTS FOR THE APPROVED PLAN

1. Volume One - Site Application, Material Recovery, LLC/Brown-field Road
Construction & Demolition Landfill. December 2001. Joyce Engineering, Inc.,
Greensboro, NC. Revised through 2003. Doc ID 3602 (partial, Section II).
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Facility Permit No: 92-31
Material Recovery C&D Landfill
Permit to Construct and Operate
March 20, 2012
Doc ID: 16327
Page 3 of 16

2. Volume Two - Site Application, Material Recovery, LLC/Brown-field Road
Construction & Demolition Landfill. December 2001. Joyce Engineering, Inc.,
Greensboro, NC. Revised through 2003. Doc ID 10463.

3. Construction Certification, Phase 1, Cell A. Prepared by Joyce Engineering,
Greensboro, NC. September 16, 2003.

4. Modification: Letter dated 25 March 2004 requesting the use of soils off-site with less
than 10 ppm nitrate and addressing that soils with greater than 10 ppm nitrate levels be
utilized on-site. Doc ID 10051.

5. Modification: New franchise approvals for Material Recovery, LLC. 20 January 2004
and 2 February 2004, Wake Board of Commissioners. The franchise changes include
adding Franklin County to the service area and increasing the daily disposal amount.
Doc ID 10551.

6. Construction Quality Assurance Report, WCA Brownfield Road C&D Landfill Cell B.
Prepared by: David Garrett, P.G., P.E, Raleigh, NC. May 22, 2006. Doc ID 232.

7. Letter from Stephen R. Berlin to Paul Crissman, dated November 16, 2006, requesting
issuance of permit to WCA Waste Corporation and providing information to support
the request for permit issuance. Doc ID 823.

8. Construction Quality Assurance Report, WCA Brownfield Road C&D Landfill Cell C.
Prepared by: David Garrett, P.G., P.E, Raleigh, NC. April 13, 2007. Doc ID 3828.

9. Application for Permit to Construct, Phase 2A. Prepared by David Garrett, P.G., P.E,
Raleigh, NC. June 25, 2008, revised through December 2010. Doc ID 12363.

10. Application for Permit to Construct, Phase 2A, Design Hydro Report, Water Quality
Monitoring Plan, and Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan. Prepared by David Garrett, P.G.,
P.E, Raleigh, NC. June 25, 2008, revised through March 2010. Doc ID 10041.
Approval letter Doc ID 10047.

11. Construction Quality Assurance Certification Report, Phase 2A, Cell 1. Prepared by
Joyce Engineering, Greensboro, NC. September 2011, revised through December 2011.
Doc ID 16328.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Facility Permit No: 92-31
Material Recovery C&D Landfill
Permit to Construct and Operate
March 20, 2012
Doc ID: 16327
Page 4 of 16

PART III: PROPERTIES APPROVED FOR THE SOLID WASTE FACILITY

Wake County, N.C. Register of Deeds
Book Page Grantee Grantor Tract Acres
8806 845 Material Recovery, LLC
William A. Turner and wife,
Debra C. Turner

1 113.55
8806 849 Material Recovery, LLC Ashley Turner Enterprises, Inc. N/A 98.41
Book of Maps
2002 791 Material Recovery, LLC

Material Recovery, LLC

1A and 1B 211.96
Book of Maps
2003 1508 Material Recovery, LLC
Material Recovery, LLC and
Margaret Talton

1 210.19
Total Site Acreage 210.19
The Wake County property ID is 174 163 9103, and the Real Estate ID is 4648.

PART IV: GENERAL PERMIT CONDITIONS

1. This permit is issued by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Waste Management, Solid Waste Section (Section). In
accordance with North Carolina Solid Waste Management Rule 15A NCAC 13B
.0201(d), a solid waste management facility permit shall have two parts: a Permit to
Construct and a Permit to Operate. The Permit to Construct shall expire January 28,
2016. The Permit to Construct shall be implemented in accordance with Attachment 2 of
this permit. The Permit to Operate shall expire January 28, 2016. The Permit to Operate
must be implemented in accordance with Attachment 3 of this permit.

2. The persons to whom this permit is issued (“permittee”) are the owners and operators of
the solid waste management facility.

3. (Intentionally Blank)

4. When this property is sold, leased, conveyed, or transferred in any manner, the deed or
other instrument of transfer must contain in the deed description section, in no smaller
type than that used in the body of the deed or instrument, a statement that the property has
been used as a sanitary landfill and a reference by book and page to the recordation of the
permit.

5. By beginning construction or receiving waste at this facility the permittee shall be
considered to have accepted the terms and conditions of this permit.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Facility Permit No: 92-31
Material Recovery C&D Landfill
Permit to Construct and Operate
March 20, 2012
Doc ID: 16327
Page 5 of 16

6. Construction and operation of this solid waste management facility must be in accordance
with the Solid Waste Management Rules, 15A NCAC 13B, Article 9 of Chapter 130A of
the North Carolina General Statutes (NCGS 130A-290, et seq.), the conditions contained
in this permit, and the approved plan. Should the approved plan and the rules conflict,
the Solid Waste Management Rules shall take precedence unless specifically addressed
by permit condition.

7. This permit is issued based on the documents submitted in support of the application for
permitting the facility identified in Attachment 1, “List of Documents for Approved
Plan,” which constitutes the approved plan for the facility. Where discrepancies exist, the
most recent submittals and the Conditions of Permit shall govern.

8. This permit may be transferred only with the approval of the Section, through the
issuance of a new or substantially amended permit in accordance with applicable statutes
and rules. In accordance with NCGS 130A-295.2(g), the permittee must notify the
Section thirty (30) days prior to any significant change in the identity or business structure
of either the owner or the operator, including but not limited to, a proposed transfer of
ownership of the facility or a change in the parent company of the owner or operator of
the facility.

9. The permittee is responsible for obtaining all permits and approvals necessary for the
development of this project including approval from appropriate agencies for
sedimentation and erosion control, and a General or Individual National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Discharge Permit, if applicable.
Issuance of this permit does not remove the permittee’s responsibilities for compliance
with any other local, state or federal rule, regulation or statute.

- End of Section -

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Facility Permit No: 92-31
Material Recovery C&D Landfill
Permit to Construct and Operate
March 20, 2012
Doc ID: 16327
Page 6 of 16

ATTACHMENT 2
CONDITIONS OF PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT

1. Pursuant to the NC Solid Waste Management Rules (Rule) 15A NCAC 13B .0201(c) and
(d)(1), this permit approves construction for Phase 2A of the landfill, consisting of
approximately 16.7 acres with a projected operating capacity of 1,400,000 cubic yards of
airspace.

2. The initial, substantial, construction authorized by this Permit to Construct must
commence within 18 months from the issuance date of this permit. If substantial
construction does not begin within 18 months from the issuance date of this permit, then
the permit to construct shall expire. Substantial construction includes, but is not limited
to, issuance of construction contracts, mobilization of equipment on site, and construction
activities including installation of sedimentation and erosion control structures. The
permittee may reapply for the Permit to Construct prior to the expiration date. The re-
application will be subject to the statutes and rules in effect on that date and may be
subject to additional fees.
3. Construction of all solid waste management units within this facility must be in
accordance with the pertinent approved plans and only for those phases of development
approved for construction as described in Attachment I, Part II, List of Documents for the
Approved Plan.
4. The permittee must conduct a preconstruction meeting at the facility prior to initiating
construction of any unit/cell and must notify the Section at least 10 days prior to the
meeting.
5. Modifications or revisions of the approved documents or changes during construction of
any landfill unit/cell require approval by the Section, and may constitute a permit
modification and be subject to a permitting fee.
6. The following conditions must be met prior to operation of Cell 2 and subsequent cells of
Phase 2A:
a. Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) documentation and a certification by the
project engineer that the landfill was built in accordance with approved plans and
the conditions of the permit must be submitted to the Section for review and
approval.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Facility Permit No: 92-31
Material Recovery C&D Landfill
Permit to Construct and Operate
March 20, 2012
Doc ID: 16327
Page 7 of 16

b. The edge of the waste footprint must be identified with permanent physical
markers, for both existing units and the new unit.
c. The Permittee must contact the appropriate regional environmental specialist and
permitting engineer to determine whether the Section chooses to hold a pre-
operative meeting with key landfill personnel and representatives of the Section.
d. Documentation of financial assurance mechanisms must be submitted to the
Section. The financial assurance amount must include closure and post-closure
costs including the new phase to receive the PTO, in accordance with 15A NCAC
13B .0546, and must include costs for potential assessment and corrective action,
in accordance with NCAC 13A 295.2 (h).
e. The Permittee must obtain a Permit to Operate for the phase from the Section in
accordance with 15A NCAC 13B .0201(d).

7. If dried sludge from the site’s previous use as a composting/sludge application site are
encountered during excavation of the landfill cell, the dried sludge must be stockpiled
separately from the insitu soils and must not be used in the cell construction.

8. No rock blasting is allowed in construction without written approval of a blasting plan by
the Section.

9. Prior to construction of Phases 2B through 5, a Permit to Construct application must be
submitted for approval to the Section. The application must be prepared in accordance
with applicable statutes and rules in effect on that date and will be subject to a permitting
fee.

10. Pursuant to Rule 15A NCAC 13B .0542(i)(2), burning of land-clearing debris generated
on-site, as a result of construction activities, requires approval by the Section prior to
initiating the burn. In addition, the Division of Air Quality and local fire department must
approve the activity prior to burning.

Geologic, Water Quality, and Landfill Gas Monitoring Requirements

11. Prior to construction of the phase or cell(s) within the phase, all piezometers, borings, and
groundwater and landfill gas monitoring wells within the footprint must be properly
abandoned by overdrilling first (exception of non-cased borings) and sealed with grout in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0113 (d)(2), entitled “Abandonment of Wells.”

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Facility Permit No: 92-31
Material Recovery C&D Landfill
Permit to Construct and Operate
March 20, 2012
Doc ID: 16327
Page 8 of 16

12. In areas where soil is to be undercut, abandoned piezometers, groundwater and landfill
gas monitoring wells and borings must not be grouted to pregrade land surface, but to the
proposed base grade surface to prevent having to cut excess grout and possibly damage
the wells.

13. A Licensed Geologist must report any pertinent geological feature(s) exposed during
phase or cell excavation. Prior to placing any landfill liner, the geologist must submit to
the Section hydrogeologist a written report that includes an accurate description of the
exposed geological feature(s) and effect of the geological feature(s) on the design,
construction, and operation of the cell, phase, or unit.
14. A Licensed Geologist must supervise the installation of groundwater monitoring wells
and landfill gas monitoring wells. Each groundwater monitoring well and landfill gas
well must be surveyed for location and elevation. Each groundwater monitoring well and
landfill gas monitoring well must have an identification plate permanently attached to the
well, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0108(o).

15. Any modification to the approved water quality monitoring, sampling, landfill gas, and
analysis plan must be submitted to the Section Hydrogeologist for review.

16. Groundwater and landfill gas monitoring well construction and abandonment must meet
the requirements of 15A NCAC 02C.

17. Within 30 days of completed construction of each new groundwater and landfill gas
monitoring well, a well construction record, well schematic, boring log, field log and
notes, and description of well development activities, certified by a Licensed Geologist,
must be submitted to the Section. Form GW-1(b) must be used for both groundwater and
landfill gas wells. The submittal must also include a scaled topographic map, showing
the location and identification of new, existing, and abandoned wells and piezometers.

18. Within thirty (30) days of the abandonment of any groundwater monitoring well or
landfill gas monitoring well, the well abandonment record and any additional information
included in the abandonment record must be certified by a Licensed Geologist, and
submitted to the Section. Form GW-30 must be used for both groundwater and landfill
gas wells.

19. All forms, reports, maps, plans, and data submitted to the Section must include an
electronic (pdf) copy.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Facility Permit No: 92-31
Material Recovery C&D Landfill
Permit to Construct and Operate
March 20, 2012
Doc ID: 16327
Page 9 of 16

20. Proper abandonment records must be submitted to the Section for the residential drinking
water well located in the center of Phase 2. The records must be submitted with the CQA
report for the construction area of Phase 2 containing the well.

Erosion and Sedimentation Control Requirements

21. All sedimentation and erosion control activities must be conducted in accordance with the
Sedimentation Control Act N.C.G.S. 113A-50, et seq., and rules promulgated under 15A
NCAC 4. All required sedimentation and erosion control measures must be installed and
operable to mitigate excessive on-site erosion and to prevent silt from leaving the area of
the landfill unit during the service life of the facility.

22. Facility construction, operations or practices must not cause or result in a discharge of
pollution, dredged material, and/or fill material into waters of the state in violation of the
requirements under Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, as amended.

23. Modifications to the approved sedimentation and erosion control activities require
approval by the North Carolina Land Quality Section. The Section must be notified of any
sedimentation and erosion control plan modifications.

- End of Section -
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Facility Permit No: 92-31
Material Recovery C&D Landfill
Permit to Construct and Operate
March 20, 2012
Doc ID: 16327
Page 10 of 16

ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF OPERATING PERMIT

PART I: OPERATING CONDITIONS

1. The Permit to Operate shall expire January 28, 2016. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 13B
.0201(g), no later than September 28, 2015, the permittee must submit to the Section a
permit amendment application prepared in accordance with 15A NCAC 13B .0535 (b).

2. This permit approves operation of Phase 2A, Cell 1 and the continued operation of Phase
1, Cells A, B, and C of the landfill, as well as the onsite environmental management and
protection facilities as described in the approved plans. Operation of future phases or
cells requires written approval of the Section after documentation has been submitted that
the area has been constructed in accordance with applicable statutes and rules.

3. The following table lists the dimensions and details for the landfill, both existing and
planned. Total gross capacity is defined as the volume measured from the bottom of
waste through the top of final cover. The estimated life of the landfill, for both northern
and southern areas, is approximately 21.9 years from 2010.

Phase Acres Gross Capacity Status
1 20 1,636,000 Partially filled
2A (Cell 1) 4.8 366,000 Approved for fill
2A (remaining area) 11.9 1,034,000 Approved for
construction
2B 8.2 1,400,000 future
2C * 1,400,000 future
Total northern area 45 5,836,000

Southern area 3-5 24.2 2,300,000 future

Total northern and
southern areas
69.2 8,136,000
*Phase 2C will be vertical fill over Phases 1, 2A, and 2B.

4. The permittee must maintain permanent markers that accurately identify the edge of the
approved waste disposal boundary.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Facility Permit No: 92-31
Material Recovery C&D Landfill
Permit to Construct and Operate
March 20, 2012
Doc ID: 16327
Page 11 of 16

5. Fill operations must be contained within the approved elevation contours as shown on the
approved application drawings. The maximum approved fill elevation for Phase 2A is
310 feet mean sea level, as shown on Drawing 8 (E2), Doc ID 12363.

6. The landfill is permitted to receive the following waste types:
a. "C&D solid waste" as defined in 15A NCAC 13B, Rule .0532(8) means solid
waste generated solely from the construction, remodeling, repair, or demolition
operations on pavement and buildings or structures. C&D waste does not include
municipal and industrial wastes that may be generated by the on-going operations
at buildings or structures.
b. “Inert debris” as defined in G.S. 130A-290 (a)(14) means solid waste that consists
solely of material such as concrete, brick, concrete block, uncontaminated soil,
rock, and gravel.
c. “Land-clearing debris” as defined in G.S. 130A-290 (a)(15) means solid waste
which is generated solely from land clearing activities, limited to stumps, trees,
limbs, brush, grass, and other naturally occurring vegetative material.
d. “Asphalt” in accordance with G.S. 130-294(m).

7. Regulated asbestos-containing material must be managed in accordance with 40 CFR 61.
Disposal of asbestos waste must be in accordance with 15 NCAC 13B .0542 (c).

8. Those wastes listed in 15A NCAC 13B .0542 (e) must not be accepted for disposal
including, but not limited to, hazardous waste, municipal solid waste, liquid waste,
commercial and industrial wastes, and yard trash.

9. Wastewater treatment sludge is not approved for disposal. Wastewater treatment sludge
may be accepted, with the approval of the Section, for utilization as a soil conditioner and
incorporated into or applied onto the vegetative growth layer. The wastewater treatment
sludge must not be applied at greater than agronomic rates nor to a depth greater than six
inches.

10. The facility is approved to accept approximately 1100 tons per day, approximately 286
days per year (5.5 days per week), with a maximum variance in accordance with GS
130A-294(b1)(1) and consistent with the approved franchise granted by the County of
Wake dated February 2, 2004.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Facility Permit No: 92-31
Material Recovery C&D Landfill
Permit to Construct and Operate
March 20, 2012
Doc ID: 16327
Page 12 of 16

11. This facility is permitted to receive solid waste generated within the following counties:
Chatham, Durham, Franklin, Johnston, Orange, and Wake and the municipalities
contained within those counties, consistent with the approved franchise approved by the
Wake County Board of Commissioners.

12. The permittee must not knowingly dispose of C&D waste that is generated within the
boundaries of a unit of local government that by ordinance:

a. Prohibits generators or collectors of C&D waste from disposing of that type or
form of C&D waste.

b. Requires generators or collectors of C&D waste to recycle that type or form of
C&D waste.

13. The facility operator must complete an approved operator training course in compliance
with G.S. 130A-309.25.
a. A responsible individual certified in landfill operations must be on-site during all
operating hours of the facility at all times while open for public use to ensure
compliance with operational requirements.
b. All pertinent landfill-operating personnel must receive training and supervision
necessary to properly operate the C&D landfill unit in accordance with G.S.
130A-309.25 and addressed by memorandum dated November 29, 2000.

14. The permittee must actively employ a training and screening program at the facility
prepared in accordance with Section .0544(e) for detecting and preventing the disposal of
excluded or unauthorized wastes. At a minimum, the program must include:
a. Random inspections of incoming loads or other comparable procedures.
b. Records of any inspections.
c. Training of personnel to recognize hazardous, liquid, and other excluded waste
types.
d. Development of a contingency plan to properly manage any identified hazardous,
liquid, MSW, or other excluded or unauthorized wastes. The plan must address
identification, removal, storage, and final disposition of these wastes.

15. The use of alternative periodic cover requires approval, prior to implementation, by the
Section. Requests for alternative periodic cover approval must include a plan detailing the
comprehensive use and a demonstration of the effectiveness of the alternative cover,
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Facility Permit No: 92-31
Material Recovery C&D Landfill
Permit to Construct and Operate
March 20, 2012
Doc ID: 16327
Page 13 of 16

developed according to Section guidelines. Plans that are approved by the Section will be
incorporated into, and made a part of, the approved documents listed in Attachment 1.

16. Financial assurance must be continuously maintained for the duration of the facility in
accordance with Rule 15A NCAC 13B .0546, 15A NCAC 13B .0547 (2), and NCGS
130A 295.2 (h). The owner and operator must annually adjust cost estimates including
closure and post-closure activities, and potential assessment and corrective action costs,
for inflation within 60 days prior to the anniversary date of the establishment of the
financial instrument(s), pursuant to 15A NCAC 13B .0546.

17. All sedimentation and erosion control activities must be conducted in accordance with the
Sedimentation Control Act N.C.G.S. 113A-50, et seq., and rules promulgated under 15A
NCAC 4. All required sedimentation and erosion control measures must be installed and
operable to mitigate excessive on-site erosion and to prevent silt from leaving the area of
the landfill unit during the service life of the facility.

18. Facility construction, operations or practices must not cause or result in a discharge of
pollution, dredged material, and/or fill material into waters of the state in violation of the
requirements under Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, as amended.

19. Modifications to the approved sedimentation and erosion control activities require
approval by the North Carolina Land Quality Section. The Section must be notified of
any sedimentation and erosion control plan modifications.

20. An updated closure and post-closure plan must be submitted for approval at least 90 days
prior to closure or partial closure of any landfill unit. The plan must include all steps and
measures necessary to close and maintain the C&D unit in accordance with all rules in
effect at that time. At a minimum, the plan must address the following:
a. Design of a final cover system in accordance with 15 NCAC 13B .0543(c), or the
solid waste management rules in effect at the time of closure;
b. Construction and maintenance/operation of the final cover system and erosion
control structures; and
c. Surface water, ground water, and explosive gas monitoring.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Facility Permit No: 92-31
Material Recovery C&D Landfill
Permit to Construct and Operate
March 20, 2012
Doc ID: 16327
Page 14 of 16

PART II: MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

21. Groundwater, surface water, and landfill gas monitoring locations must be established
and monitored as identified in the approved plans (Doc ID 10041 and 10047). Any
proposed modification to an approved plan must be submitted to the Section and
approved prior to implementation.
22. The permittee must obtain approval from the Section for the modification of any
groundwater or landfill gas monitoring well. Design, construction, abandonment,
surveying, and well plate identification of groundwater and landfill gas monitoring wells
must be implemented in accordance with the conditions in Attachment 2, Geologic,
Water Quality, and Landfill Gas Monitoring Requirements.
23. Groundwater monitoring wells and surface water sampling locations must be sampled at
least semi-annually in accordance with 15A NCAC 13B .0544, the approved water
quality monitoring plan, and the current policies and guidelines of the Section in effect at
the time of sampling. In accordance with 15A NCAC 13B .0544(d), landfill gas
monitoring must be conducted quarterly, unless otherwise specified by the Section.
24. Monitoring reports of the analytical results for surface water and groundwater monitoring
sampling events must be submitted to the Section within 120 days of the sample
collection date. Analytical laboratory data must be submitted in electronic portable
document format (pdf) and in a spreadsheet format in an Electronic Data Deliverable
(EDD) Template. All monitoring reports must contain:
a. a potentiometric surface map for the current sampling event,
b. analytical laboratory reports and summary tables,
c. a completed Solid Waste Environment Monitoring Data Form, and
d. laboratory data submitted in accordance with the EDD Template.
25. A readily accessible unobstructed path must be maintained so that groundwater and
landfill gas monitoring wells and surface water sampling locations are accessible using
four-wheel drive vehicles.
26. Documentation of well completion, development details, repair, abandonment, and all
other pertinent activities associated with each groundwater and landfill gas monitoring
well must be maintained in the facility operating record. The permittee must maintain a
record of all groundwater, surface water, and landfill gas monitoring events and analytical
data in the operating record.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Facility Permit No: 92-31
Material Recovery C&D Landfill
Permit to Construct and Operate
March 20, 2012
Doc ID: 16327
Page 15 of 16

27. All forms, reports, maps, plans, and data submitted to the Section must include an
electronic (pdf) copy.

28. All landfill gas monitoring events must be conducted by properly trained personnel and
must include monitoring for all explosive gases, including hydrogen sulfide. Landfill gas
monitoring must include interior monitoring of onsite buildings.

29. Landfill gas monitoring results must be recorded on forms provided by the Section and be
maintained in the facility’s operating record.
REPORTING AND RECORDKEEPING

30. Copies of this permit, the approved plans, and all records required to be maintained by the
permittee must be maintained at the facility and made available to the Section upon
request during normal business hours.

31. The owner or operator must maintain records of the following. Scales must be used to
weigh the amount of waste received. The daily reports are to be summarized into a
monthly report for use in the required annual reports.

a. The amount of all accepted solid waste materials as (i) C&D wastes, (ii) material
used as alternate periodic cover, and (iii) recyclable material.

b. Daily records of waste received, and origins of the loads.

32. On or before August 1 annually, the Permittee must submit an annual facility report to the
Section, on forms prescribed by the Section.

a. The reporting period shall be for the previous year beginning July 1 and ending
June 30.
b. The annual facility report must list the amount of waste received in tons and be
compiled:
i) On a monthly basis.
ii) By county, city or transfer station of origin.
iii) By specific waste type.
iv) By disposal location within the facility.
v) By diversion to alternative management facilities.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Facility Permit No: 92-31
Material Recovery C&D Landfill
Permit to Construct and Operate
March 20, 2012
Doc ID: 16327
Page 16 of 16

c. A measurement of volume utilized in the landfill cells must be performed during
the second quarter of the calendar year. The date and volumes, in cubic yards,
must be included in the report.

d. The amount of waste, in tons from scale records, disposed in landfill cells from
October 1, 2003 through the date of the annual volume survey must be included in
the report.

e. The tons of C&D waste recycled, recovered or diverted from disposal including a
description of how and where the material was ultimately managed, as applicable,
must be included in the report.

f. The completed report must be forwarded to the Regional Environmental Senior
Specialist for the facility by the date due on the prescribed annual facility report
form.

g. A copy of the completed report must be forwarded to each county manager for
each county from which waste was received the facility. Documentation that a
copy of the report has been forwarded to the county managers must be sent to the
Regional Environmental Senior Specialist by the date due on the prescribed
annual facility report form.

PART III: MISCELLANEOUS SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CONDITIONS,
(SPECIFY)

33. The reclamation pad operation as shown on the application drawings is not approved for
construction or operation.

34. The wood waste/land clearing debris storage and processing operation as shown in the
application text and on drawings is not approved for operation at this time.

- End of Permit Conditions -
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Wake County Environmental Services Department
Water Quality Division, Watershed Management Section
336 Fayetteville St.  P.O. Box 550  Raleigh, NC 27602
TEL [phone]  FAX [phone]
WMCPA – WATERSHED MANAGEMENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN APPROVAL

1
APPROVAL_SW+S&EConstructionPlan-V.1_WM

Project Name Brownfield Road C&D Landfill (stockpile addition) Watershed Lower Neuse
Date Received 2/3/16
Date Processing
Initiated 2/3/16 Disturbed Acreage 86.39

S&E Permit Number S#2148
S&E
Plan Review Fee $2925(paid) S&E Permit Fee $2846(pending)

SW Permit Number S#2148
SW
Plan Review Fee N/A SW Permit Fee N/A

Applicant: Engineer:
Name Wake Reclamation , LLC Name: Smith Gardner, INC
Address:
2600 Brownfield Rd
Raleigh, NC 27610 Address:
14 N Boylan Ave
Raleigh, NC 27603
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] x142
Email: Email: [e-mail]

Plan Date/Revision Date: 12.24.15/2.3.16
Approval Date:
2/3/16

The above-referenced erosion control and stormwater management plans have been reviewed and
conditionally approved.
Brownfield C&D is approved for the addition of 11.39 ac disturbance for a stockpile that is to be converted back
to existing conditions, grade and land cover, upon abandonment of stockpile. Conversion back to existing
conditions exempts requirement for stormwater for this additional disturbance. The permit acreage will be
added to an existing 75 ac with a new site total of 86.39 ac. [Merged from Permit S#998008]
Approved Site Data:
Permitted
Imp (SF)= TBD
Road ISA
(SF)= TBD Lots ISA (SF)= TBD
Other ISA
(SF)= TBD
Nitrogen Pre
(lb/ac/yr)= TBD
Nitrogen Post
(lb/ac/yr)= TBD
Nitrogen Post
BMP
(lb/ac/yr)= TBD
Nitrogen
Offset (lb)= TBD

Conditions of Approval
Items marked with an “X” were noted as conditions of the Stormwater and Sediment and Erosion Control Plan approval. Unless
otherwise noted, all references shown in brackets are for the Wake County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), adopted
04/17/06.
1.
A mandatory preconstruction meeting is required between the owner, contractor, and Wake County prior to
issuance of the Stormwater and Land Disturbance Permits. Please call to schedule this meeting at your convenience.
The Stormwater and Land Disturbance permit fees are due at that time.
2. Grading, other than for installation of soil erosion and sedimentation control measures, is prohibited prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. [10-30-7(D)]
3. Contractor shall follow plans strictly and maintain contact with Wake County prior to making any field modifications
to erosion and sediment control devices. No devices shall be removed without prior approval from Wake County.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Wake County Environmental Services Department
Water Quality Division, Watershed Management Section
336 Fayetteville St.  P.O. Box 550  Raleigh, NC 27602
TEL [phone]  FAX [phone]
WMCPA – WATERSHED MANAGEMENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN APPROVAL

2
APPROVAL_SW+S&EConstructionPlan-V.1_WM

4.
Wake County’s sedimentation pollution control program is performance oriented, requiring protection of the natural
resources and adjoining properties. If at any time during the project it is determined that the Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Plan is inadequate to meet the requirements of the Erosion and Sedimentation Control
Ordinance of Wake County, this office may require revisions in the plan and its implementation to ensure compliance
with the Ordinance.
5.
All projects that have approved plans for an E&SC permit on or after Aug. 3, 2011 are covered by the NPDES
Construction Stormwater General Permit, NCG 010000. In addition, effective October 1, 2010, persons conducting
land-disturbing activities larger than one acre must inspect their project after each phase of the project, and
document the inspection in writing. A packet with information on the NPDES General Permit and the Self-inspection
Program will be provided at the preconstruction meeting. Permits and inspection reports shall be maintained on site.
6. SUBDIVISIONS ONLY Builders are required to obtain grading permits for cumulative disturbance over one acre
(including non-contiguous lots).
Stormwater COAs - All conditions of approval must be completed and approved by Wake County prior to final plat approval or
signoff of the Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.) for future building permits. Items required prior to final plat or building permit
approval are checked and listed below.
7.
As-Built Plans – Upon completion of required improvements, an as-built plan of required stormwater improvements
must be submitted (must indicate that stormwater improvements were constructed in accordance with the
approved plan). [9-31-2]
8. Maintenance Plan
a.
The developer must record and reference on the record plat, a maintenance plan providing instruction about
annual maintenance tasks and associated costs for at least a 20-year period. [9-32-3(A)]
b.
It will be the responsibility of the property owners association or lot owner to update the maintenance plan at
least every 10 years. [9-32-3(B)]
9. Maintenance Agreement
a.
The developer must record and reference on the record plat, a maintenance agreement or restrictive covenant
that sets for the property owners association’s or lot owner’s continuing responsibilities for maintenance,
including how cost will be apportioned among lot owners served. [9-32-4(A)]
b. The maintenance agreement must provide that the association and its individual members are jointly and
severable liable for maintenance. [9-32-4(B)]
10.
All maintenance documents required must be submitted prior to record plat approval and must be referenced on the
record plat. For developments not requiring record plats, documentation must be submitted prior to building permit
issuance. [9-32-6]
11.
Performance Guarantee – The county may not approve a record plat or issue a building permit until stormwater
improvements required of the developer have been completed or a performance guarantee has been provided.
[9-31-1]
Applicable Regulations
12. 9-32-2 Parties Responsible for Maintenance of Improvements
a.
The developer must maintain stormwater improvements until accepted by a property owners association or lot
owner. The developer must disclose which party will be responsible for continued maintenance on the record
plat.
b.
Before improvements are accepted for maintenance by the property owners association or lot owner, the
developer must certify to the property owners association or lot owner and the county that improvements are
complete and functioning as designed.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Wake County Environmental Services Department
Water Quality Division, Watershed Management Section
336 Fayetteville St.  P.O. Box 550  Raleigh, NC 27602
TEL [phone]  FAX [phone]
WMCPA – WATERSHED MANAGEMENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN APPROVAL

3
APPROVAL_SW+S&EConstructionPlan-V.1_WM

13. Part 5 – Enforcement and Penalties
a. Failure to complete required improvements or failure to maintain improvements as required by the approved
plan are violations and subject to a fine of up to $1,000 per day. [9-50]
b.
Inspection of Stormwater Improvements – Wake County agents have the right to inspect sites to determine
whether stormwater improvements are being installed and maintained in compliance with the ordinance. [9-
51]
14.
10-30-6 Validity of Plan, Lapse of Approval - An approved erosion and sedimentation control plan is valid for 2
calendar years from the date of approval. If a land disturbance permit has not been obtained within the 2-year
period, the erosion and sedimentation control plan approval becomes null and void.
15. 10-20-11 Standards for Landfills
a. Land disturbance permits for landfills are valid for five (5) calendar years. If no construction activity has begun
within 2-years, the land disturbance permit becomes null and void.
b. A valid land disturbance permit is required for the duration of the ―active life‖ of the landfill or phased
permitted portion thereof until completion of closure activities.
c. Land disturbance permits for landfills may be renewed in 5-year increments.
d.
Land Disturbance permits for landfills may be automatically renewed upon the certification of Financially
Responsible Party and upon concurrence by County staff that there are no major modifications to the
approved plan and that the project adheres to all current applicable standards.
e. Automatic permit renewals will not be subject to plan review and land disturbance permit fees.
f.
No plan shall be approved unless it complies with all applicable state and Wake County erosion and
sedimentation control and stormwater management requirements. Approval assumes the applicant’s
compliance with federal and state water quality and landfill laws, regulations and rules in addition to Wake
County’s regulations.
g. Adequate erosion and sediment control measures consisting of vegetative cover, materials, structures or
devices must be utilized to prevent sediment from leaving the landfill facility.
h.
Whenever the County determines that significant erosion and sedimentation is occurring as a result of land-
disturbing activity, despite application and maintenance of protective practices, the party conducting the land-
disturbing activity will be required to and shall take additional protective action.
i. Adequate erosion and sediment control measures consisting of vegetative cover, materials, structures or
devices must be utilized to prevent excessive on-site erosion of the landfill facility or portion thereof.
j.
Erosion and sedimentation control measures, structures and devices for landfills must be designed,
constructed and maintained to manage the calculated maximum peak rate of runoff generated by the 24-hour,
25-year storm event. Runoff rates must be calculated using the procedures in the USDA, Soil Conservation
Service’s National Engineering Field manual for Conservation Practices, or the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual or other
calculation procedures acceptable to Wake County.
k.
Stormwater plan review for landfills shall be included in the plan review for erosion and sedimentation control
and stormwater improvements shall be permitted under the land disturbance permit upon payment of
applicable land disturbances review and permit fees.
l. Landfills shall conform to the requirements of the Sedimentation and Pollution Control Law (15A NCAC 04) and
any required NPDES permits.
m. Phased permits may be closed upon compliance with Wake County’s certificate of completion requirements.
16. 10-30-8 Actions Required Prior to Land Disturbance
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Wake County Environmental Services Department
Water Quality Division, Watershed Management Section
336 Fayetteville St.  P.O. Box 550  Raleigh, NC 27602
TEL [phone]  FAX [phone]
WMCPA – WATERSHED MANAGEMENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN APPROVAL

4
APPROVAL_SW+S&EConstructionPlan-V.1_WM

a.
S&EC plan approval and land disturbance permit issued must be prominently displayed until all construction is
complete, all permanent sedimentation and erosion control measures are installed and the site has been
stabilized. A copy of the approved plan must be kept on file at the job site.
b. No person shall initiate a land-disturbing activity until notifying Wake County of the date that the land-
disturbing activity will begin.
17. 10-31-1 Authority
a.
County officials may enter any property, public or private, at reasonable times for the purpose of investigating
and inspecting the sites of any land-disturbing activity. No person shall refuse entry or access to any authorized
representative or agent for the County who requests entry for purposes of inspections, and presents
appropriate credentials, nor shall any person obstruct, hamper, or interfere with any such representatives
while in the process of carrying out their official duties.
b.
Agents and officials of the County will periodically inspect land-disturbing activities to ensure compliance with
the North Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, this article, or rules or orders adopted or issued
pursuant to this article, and to determine whether the measures required in the erosion and sedimentation
control plan are effective in controlling erosion and sedimentation resulting from land-disturbing activity.
c.
Any land-disturbing activity will be the responsibility of the person(s) conducting the land disturbing activity,
including the property owners. Failure to prevent off site sedimentation will be deemed a violation of the
erosion and sedimentation control regulations of this article.
Wake County Watershed Management Section is not responsible for subject approvals of other Local, State or Federal Agencies. The
subject approvals are (but not limited to) Federal Emergency Management Area Flood regulations/requirements, Division of Water
Quality under stormwater or other water quality regulations/requirements, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under Article 404/401
(Wetlands/Streams) jurisdiction/requirements, and/or any Federal, State, County and Local municipal regulations or permit
requirements. The approval issued in this letter cannot supersede any other required permit or approval.
Watershed Manager
Name & Signature:
Shawn Springer, PE Contact Info:
[e-mail]
919-369-6135

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

Appendix B
Photographic Log

Construction Quality Assurance Report
Brownfield Road C&D Landfill Phase 2A Stage 2
Raleigh, North Carolina

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

This page intentionally left blank.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Client Name:
Wake Reclamation, LLC

Site Location:
Raleigh, North Carolina

Project No.
BROWNFIELD-16-1

Photo No.
1 Date:
3/1/16

Direction Photo Taken:

North
Description:

E&S controls were
established for
stockpile area.

Photo No.
2 Date:
3/1/16

Direction Photo Taken:
West
Description:

Drainage channel with
check dams along
perimeter of stockpile
area.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Client Name:
Wake Reclamation, LLC

Site Location:
Raleigh, North Carolina

Project No.
BROWNFIELD-16-1

Photo No.
3 Date:
3/8/16

Direction Photo Taken:

Northeast
Description:

Commencement of
excavation of Phase 2A
Stage 2.

Photo No.
4 Date:
4/6/16

Direction Photo Taken:
Southeast
Description:

Eastern berm and
access road.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Client Name:
Wake Reclamation, LLC

Site Location:
Raleigh, North Carolina

Project No.
BROWNFIELD-16-1

Photo No.
5 Date:
4/6/16

Direction Photo Taken:

West
Description:

Excavation of Stage 2 in
progress.

Photo No.
6 Date:
4/13/16

Direction Photo Taken:
Southeast
Description:

Excavation of Stage 2 in
progress.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Client Name:
Wake Reclamation, LLC

Site Location:
Raleigh, North Carolina

Project No.
BROWNFIELD-16-1

Photo No.
7 Date:
6/7/16

Direction Photo Taken:
South

Description:

Established vegetation
in perimeter channel
with matting and check
dams along access
road.

Photo No.
8 Date:
6/7/16

Direction Photo Taken:

West
Description:
Phase 2A Stage 2
Subgrade

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

Appendix C
Subgrade Inspection Report

Construction Quality Assurance Report
Brownfield Road C&D Landfill Phase 2A Stage 2
Raleigh, North Carolina

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

This page intentionally left blank.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

ME

Date:
To:
From
RE:

On Ma
Raleig
soil ty
PWR
elevat
south
elevat
obser
a few

Based
subgr
invest

Madel
Projec
MORAN
: M
S
S
: M
S
B
ay 27, 2016
gh, for the p
ypes were c
above bedro
tions. It was
ern slope of
tions mainta
ved in three
feet visible)
d on my obse
rade constru
tigation.
line German
ct Geologist
NDUM
May 27, 2016
Stacey A. Smith
Smith Gardner,
Madeline Germ
Smith Gardner,
Brownfield Ro
, I visited th
purpose of in
onsistent w
ock). This a
s understood
f the cell; ho
ained the pro
locations. T
and relative
ervation, I he
uction, was
n, P.G.
h, P.E., Carter Sh
Inc.
an, P. G.
Inc.
oad C&D Land
he Waste In
nspecting th
with those en
area had be
d that rock h
owever, sligh
oper separa
These were
e position in
ereby certify
materially c
hore, E.I.
fill Phase 2-S
ndustries Br
e subgrade
ncountered
een previous
had been en
ht adjustme
ation from b
determined
line with the
y that the sub
consistent w
Stage2A Subg
rownfield Ro
in the Phas
during drilli
sly excavate
countered d
nts to the de
edrock. Du
d to be bould
e slope.
bgrade mate
with the soil
grade Certific
oad C&D La
se 2 – Stage
ing (primari
ed to the de
during const
esign ensur
ring my visi
ders based o
erial, followi
types found
ation
andfill Facili
2A Cell. I f
ly silty sand
signed subg
ruction alon
ed that subg
it, boulders
on their size
ing completi
d during the
ty, in
found
d and
grade
ng the
grade
were
(only
ion of
e site
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

This page intentionally left blank.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

Appendix D
Well Abandonment Records

Construction Quality Assurance Report
Brownfield Road C&D Landfill Phase 2A Stage 2
Raleigh, North Carolina

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

This page intentionally left blank.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
D
o
c
u
S
i
g
n

E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e

I
D
:

1
1
8
F
5
3
B
4
-
0
D
6
5
-
4
E
4
2
-
8
1
C
6
-
4
8
A
C
F
6
E
9
F
7
F
9
D
o
c
u
S
i
g
n

E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e

I
D
:

1
1
8
F
5
3
B
4
-
0
D
6
5
-
4
E
4
2
-
8
1
C
6
-
4
8
A
C
F
6
E
9
F
7
F
9
D
o
c
u
S
i
g
n

E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e

I
D
:

1
1
8
F
5
3
B
4
-
0
D
6
5
-
4
E
4
2
-
8
1
C
6
-
4
8
A
C
F
6
E
9
F
7
F
9
D
o
c
u
S
i
g
n

E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e

I
D
:

1
1
8
F
5
3
B
4
-
0
D
6
5
-
4
E
4
2
-
8
1
C
6
-
4
8
A
C
F
6
E
9
F
7
F
9
D
o
c
u
S
i
g
n

E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e

I
D
:

1
1
8
F
5
3
B
4
-
0
D
6
5
-
4
E
4
2
-
8
1
C
6
-
4
8
A
C
F
6
E
9
F
7
F
9
D
o
c
u
S
i
g
n

E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e

I
D
:

1
1
8
F
5
3
B
4
-
0
D
6
5
-
4
E
4
2
-
8
1
C
6
-
4
8
A
C
F
6
E
9
F
7
F
9
D
o
c
u
S
i
g
n

E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e

I
D
:

1
1
8
F
5
3
B
4
-
0
D
6
5
-
4
E
4
2
-
8
1
C
6
-
4
8
A
C
F
6
E
9
F
7
F
9
D
o
c
u
S
i
g
n

E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e

I
D
:

1
1
8
F
5
3
B
4
-
0
D
6
5
-
4
E
4
2
-
8
1
C
6
-
4
8
A
C
F
6
E
9
F
7
F
9
D
o
c
u
S
i
g
n

E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e

I
D
:

1
1
8
F
5
3
B
4
-
0
D
6
5
-
4
E
4
2
-
8
1
C
6
-
4
8
A
C
F
6
E
9
F
7
F
9
D
o
c
u
S
i
g
n

E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e

I
D
:

1
1
8
F
5
3
B
4
-
0
D
6
5
-
4
E
4
2
-
8
1
C
6
-
4
8
A
C
F
6
E
9
F
7
F
9

Appendix E
Meeting Minutes

Construction Quality Assurance Report
Brownfield Road C&D Landfill Phase 2A Stage 2
Raleigh, North Carolina

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

This page intentionally left blank.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

MEMORANDUM

Date: February 15, 2016
To: Distribution and Meeting Attendees
From: Carter T. Shore, E.I.
Smith Gardner, Inc.
RE: Brownfield Road C&D Landfill
Phase 2A – Stage 2 Construction & Closure Event No. 1
Pre-Construction Meeting Summary

Attendees: See attached list and contact information.

Meeting Summary:

A pre-construction meeting was held Tuesday, January 16th at the scalehouse to discuss the
plans for the construction of Phase 2A – Stage 2 and Closure Event No. 1 of the Brownfield
Road C&D Landfill. The meeting began at 2:00 p.m. and the following items were discussed:

A. Tentative Construction Schedule/Milestones

The Notice to Proceed (NTP) was discussed and will be issued once bonds have been
received from Baxter Johnson. Work will generally occur Monday through Saturday (7 a.m.
to 7 p.m. as daylight allows). Initial plans are to focus on construction of sediment basin and
stockpile area to allow for cell excavation. Closure work will begin in spring to increase
success of revegetation. Work sequencing will be discussed and updated at regular
construction meetings.

B. Designation of Responsible Personnel

Wake Reclamation, LLC (Owner)
David Pepper, Director of Capital Projects
Don Plessinger, Site Manager
Richard Call, Jr., Site Supervisor

S+G (Design and CQA Engineer)
Stacey Smith, P.E., Senior Engineer
Carter Shore, E.I., Staff Engineer
Geotechnics (Soil Testing)

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Pre-Construction Meeting Summary – January 19, 2016
February 15, 2016
Page 2 of 3
Baxter Johnson Contracting, Inc. (Contractor)
Brady Johnson, Project Manager
Brad Murray, Site Superintendent

Wake County - Water Quality
Shawn Springer, P.E., Site Inspector

C. Field Decisions and Change Orders

• Conflicts between drawings and field conditions shall be brought to the attention of
S+G ASAP for resolution.

D. Distribution of Contract Documents

S+G will provide copies as requested by contractor and site.

E. Submittals

• Submittals will be reviewed by Engineer and issued back to Contractor as quickly as
possible.

Electronic submittals will be used.

F. Record Documents

• S+G and Geotechnics will perform and document all quality assurance testing.
• S+G will maintain all test and sample information for preparation of the certification
report.

G. Use of Site and Owner’s Requirements
• Site access will be through the existing entrances and as coordinated with Site (Mr.
Call).
• All personnel were reminded that the job is at an active landfill. Mr. Plessinger has
informed site personnel that Baxter Johnson equipment has right-of-way. Baxter
Johnson discussed use of flagmen to control traffic flow.

H. Safety and First Aid Procedures

Safety was discussed. Baxter Johnson has an internal safety program that is used.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
Pre-Construction Meeting Summary – January 19, 2016
February 15, 2016
Page 3 of 3
I. Security Procedures

• Baxter Johnson is responsible for security when working after landfill hours and the
gate must be locked.
• Baxter Johnson is responsible for securing equipment on-site.

J. Pay Requests

• Pay requests should be submitted at/near the end of each month to S+G (Attn: Carter
Shore).

S+G will forward approved pay requests to Mr. Pepper.

K. Other Items

Land disturbance and erosion control permits are still in the process of being reviewed by
Mr. Springer. S+G will work on acquiring approval and the permits as quickly as possible so
as to not hold up construction activities. A pre-construction meeting with a County
representative present will need to take place.

L. Next Meeting

Regular project meetings will be held monthly during active construction. It was agreed that
regular meetings would be held each month at the scalehouse. The initial meeting will be
February 16th at 8 a.m.

Attachment: Attendee List
Baxter Johnson Schedule

cc: Distribution:
David Pepper, Waste Industries USA, Inc.
Don Plessinger, Waste Industries USA, Inc.
Richard Call, Jr., Waste Industries USA, Inc.
Brady Johnson, Baxter Johnson
File

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

Appendix F
Earthwork CQA Data

Construction Quality Assurance Report
Brownfield Road C&D Landfill Phase 2A Stage 2
Raleigh, North Carolina

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

This page intentionally left blank.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

22
0
0

W
e
s
t
i
n
g
h
o
u
s
e

B
l
v
d
.
,

S
u
i
t
e

1
0
3

•

R
a
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
4

•

P
h
o
n
e

(
9
1
9
)

8
7
6
-
0
4
0
5

•

F
a
x

(
9
1
9
)

8
7
6
-
0
4
6
0

•

w
w
w
.
g
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
s
.
n
e
t

Sm
i
t
h
+
G
a
r
d
n
e
r
,

I
n
c
.
Br
o
w
n
f
i
e
l
d

R
d
.

C
&
D

L
a
n
d
f
i
l
l
20
1
6
-
6
2
5
Re
p
o
r
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

:

G
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
s

R
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e

:

P
a
g e
:

1

o
f

1
Da
t
e

(s ) :
Re
v
i
e
w
e
d

B
y :
Da
t
e

:

2
/
2
3
/
1
6
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r

:

Bo
r
r
o
w

S
o
u
r
c
e

:
MD
D

p
c
f

O
p
t
.

%
M

W
D

(
p
c
f
)

%

M

D
D

(
p
c
f
)

%

C

%

R
e
q
.
ND
-

1
40
'

L
i
f
t

1

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
1
-
0
0
1

1
1
8
.
3

1
2
.
1
13
0
.
1

1
4
.
1

1
1
4
.
0

9
6
.
4
%

9
5
.
0
%
DC
-

1
40
'

L
i
f
t

1

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
1
-
0
0
1

1
1
8
.
3

1
2
.
1
13
1
.
0

1
4
.
6

1
1
4
.
3

9
6
.
7
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

2
20
0
'

L
i
f
t

1

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
1
-
0
0
2

1
1
0
.
0

1
3
.
0
12
2
.
8

1
3
.
4

1
0
8
.
3

9
8
.
4
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

3
33
0
'

L
i
f
t

1

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
1
-
0
0
2

1
1
0
.
0

1
3
.
0
12
3
.
8

1
4
.
7

1
0
7
.
9

9
8
.
1
%

9
5
.
0
%
Ga
u
g
e

M
o
d
e
l
Ga
u
g
e

N
u
m
b
e
r
Mo
i
s
t
u
r
e

C
o
u
n
t
De
n
s
i
t
y

C
o
u
n
t
24
6
5
6
34
3
0
18
8
6
58
1
Access Road, 1/28/16 Access Road, 1/28/16 Access Road, 1/28/16 Access Road, 1/28/16
Cl
i
e
n
t
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
m
e

:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

:
Pr
o
c
t
o
r

I
.
D
.

No
.
Pr
o
c
t
o
r

D
a
t
a
Aa
r
o
n

S
m
i
t
h
Me
a
s
u
r
e
d

I
n

P
l
a
c
e

C
o
m
p
a
c
t
i
o
n
Comments
Ba
x
t
e
r
-
J
o
h
n
s
o
n
On

S
i
t
e
CA
T

1
0
0

F

R
o
l
l
e
r
,

S
a
k
a
i

S
V

5
0
5

P

R
o
l
l
e
r
Fi
e
l
d

D
e
n
s
i
t
y

R
e
p
o
r
t
Co
m
p
a
c
t
i
o
n

Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t

:
Te
s
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

T
e
s
t

L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
/

Li
f
t
Ro
d

De
p
t
h
Sh
a
n
n
o
n

S
i
s
e
l
l
SF
F
D
R
-
0
1
1/
2
8
/
1
6
-
1
/
2
9
/
1
6
Do
c
u
S
i
g
n

E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e

I
D
:

1
1
8
F
5
3
B
4
-
0
D
6
5
-
4
E
4
2
-
8
1
C
6
-
4
8
A
C
F
6
E
9
F
7
F
9

22
0
0

W
e
s
t
i
n
g
h
o
u
s
e

B
l
v
d
.
,

S
u
i
t
e

1
0
3

•

R
a
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
4

•

P
h
o
n
e

(
9
1
9
)

8
7
6
-
0
4
0
5

•

F
a
x

(
9
1
9
)

8
7
6
-
0
4
6
0

•

w
w
w
.
g
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
s
.
n
e
t

Sm
i
t
h
+
G
a
r
d
n
e
r
,

I
n
c
.
Br
o
w
n
f
i
e
l
d

R
o
a
d

C
&
D

L
a
n
d
f
i
l
l
20
1
6
-
6
2
5
Re
p
o
r
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

:

G
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
s

R
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e

:

P
a
g e
:

1

o
f

1
Da
t
e

(s ) :
Re
v
i
e
w
e
d

B
y :
Da
t
e

:

2
/
2
3
/
1
6
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r

:

Bo
r
r
o
w

S
o
u
r
c
e

:
MD
D

p
c
f

O
p
t
.

%
M

W
D

(
p
c
f
)

%

M

D
D

(
p
c
f
)

%

C

%

R
e
q
.
ND
-

4

3
0
'

L
i
f
t

2

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
1
-
0
0
2

1
1
0
.
0

1
3
.
0
12
0
.
6

1
3
.
4

1
0
6
.
3

9
6
.
7
%

9
5
.
0
%
DC
-

2

3
0
'

L
i
f
t

2

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
1
-
0
0
2

1
1
0
.
0

1
3
.
0
12
1
.
6

1
3
.
8

1
0
6
.
8

9
7
.
1
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

5

1
7
0
'

L
i
f
t

2

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
1
-
0
0
2

1
1
0
.
0

1
3
.
0
11
6
.
4

1
1
.
3

1
0
4
.
6

9
5
.
1
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

6

3
1
0
'

L
i
f
t

2

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
1
-
0
0
2

1
1
0
.
0

1
3
.
0
11
7
.
1

1
1
.
9

1
0
4
.
6

9
5
.
1
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

7

2
6
0
'

L
i
f
t

3

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
2
-
0
0
2

1
1
0
.
2

1
5
.
5
12
0
.
4

1
5
.
0

1
0
4
.
7

9
5
.
0
%

9
5
.
0
%
DC
-

3

2
6
0
'

L
i
f
t

3

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
2
-
0
0
2

1
1
0
.
2

1
5
.
5
12
1
.
4

1
5
.
4

1
0
5
.
2

9
5
.
4
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

8

3
7
0
'

L
i
f
t

3

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
2
-
0
0
2

1
1
0
.
2

1
5
.
5
12
7
.
0

1
6
.
4

1
0
9
.
1

9
9
.
0
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

9

2
7
0
'

L
i
f
t

4

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
2
-
0
0
2

1
1
0
.
2

1
5
.
5
12
5
.
1

1
7
.
5

1
0
6
.
5

9
6
.
6
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

1
0

3
8
0
'

L
i
f
t

4

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
2
-
0
0
2

1
1
0
.
2

1
5
.
5
12
4
.
2

1
7
.
1

1
0
6
.
1

9
6
.
2
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

1
1

2
7
0
'

L
i
f
t

5

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
2
-
0
0
2

1
1
0
.
2

1
5
.
5
12
2
.
7

1
7
.
0

1
0
4
.
9

9
5
.
2
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

1
2

3
8
0
'

L
i
f
t

5

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
2
-
0
0
2

1
1
0
.
2

1
5
.
5
12
3
.
8

1
6
.
9

1
0
5
.
9

9
6
.
1
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

1
3

3
0
'

L
i
f
t

3

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
2
-
0
0
1

1
0
7
.
8

1
7
.
6
12
3
.
4

1
9
.
5

1
0
3
.
3

9
5
.
8
%

9
5
.
0
%
DC
-

4

3
0
'

L
i
f
t

3

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
2
-
0
0
1

1
0
7
.
8

1
7
.
6
12
3
.
0

2
0
.
1

1
0
2
.
5

9
5
.
1
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

1
4

1
6
0
'

L
i
f
t

3

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
2
-
0
0
1

1
0
7
.
8

1
7
.
6
12
2
.
5

1
9
.
4

1
0
2
.
6

9
5
.
2
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

1
5

3
0
'

L
i
f
t

4

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
2
-
0
0
2

1
1
0
.
2

1
5
.
5
12
4
.
1

1
7
.
5

1
0
5
.
6

9
5
.
8
%

9
5
.
0
%
DC
-

5

3
0
'

L
i
f
t

4

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
2
-
0
0
2

1
1
0
.
2

1
5
.
5
12
3
.
3

1
7
.
3

1
0
5
.
1

9
5
.
4
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

1
6

1
6
0
'

L
i
f
t

4

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
2
-
0
0
2

1
1
0
.
2

1
5
.
5
12
4
.
8

1
7
.
0

1
0
6
.
7

9
6
.
8
%

9
5
.
0
%
Access Road, 2/2/16
Ga
u
g
e

M
o
d
e
l
Ga
u
g
e

N
u
m
b
e
r
Mo
i
s
t
u
r
e

C
o
u
n
t
De
n
s
i
t
y

C
o
u
n
t
24
6
5
6
34
3
0
19
0
3
57
2
Access Road, 2/2/16Access Road, 2/2/16 Access Road, 2/2/16 Access Road, 2/2/16Access Road, 2/1/16 Access Road, 2/1/16 Access Road, 2/1/16 Access Road, 2/1/16 Access Road, 2/2/16 Access Road, 2/2/16
Cl
i
e
n
t
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
m
e

:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

:
Access Road, 2/2/16 Access Road, 2/2/16 Access Road, 2/3/16 Access Road, 2/3/16 Access Road, 2/3/16Access Road, 2/2/16
Pr
o
c
t
o
r

I
.
D
.

No
.
Pr
o
c
t
o
r

D
a
t
a
Aa
r
o
n

S
m
i
t
h
Me
a
s
u
r
e
d

I
n

P
l
a
c
e

C
o
m
p
a
c
t
i
o
n
Comments
Ba
x
t
e
r
-
J
o
h
n
s
o
n
On

S
i
t
e
CA
T

1
0
0

F

R
o
l
l
e
r
,

S
a
k
a
i

S
V

5
0
5

P

R
o
l
l
e
r
Fi
e
l
d

D
e
n
s
i
t
y

R
e
p
o
r
t
Co
m
p
a
c
t
i
o
n

Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t

:
Te
s
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

T
e
s
t

L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
/

Li
f
t
Ro
d

De
p
t
h
Sh
a
n
n
o
n

S
i
s
e
l
l
SF
F
D
R
-
0
2
2/
1
/
1
6

t
o

2
/
6
/
1
6
Do
c
u
S
i
g
n

E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e

I
D
:

1
1
8
F
5
3
B
4
-
0
D
6
5
-
4
E
4
2
-
8
1
C
6
-
4
8
A
C
F
6
E
9
F
7
F
9

22
0
0

W
e
s
t
i
n
g
h
o
u
s
e

B
l
v
d
.
,

S
u
i
t
e

1
0
3

•

R
a
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
4

•

P
h
o
n
e

(
9
1
9
)

8
7
6
-
0
4
0
5

•

F
a
x

(
9
1
9
)

8
7
6
-
0
4
6
0

•

w
w
w
.
g
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
s
.
n
e
t

20
1
6
-
6
2
5
Re
p
o
r
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

:

G
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
s

R
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e

:

P
a
g e
:

1

o
f

1
Da
t
e

(s ) :
Re
v
i
e
w
e
d

B
y :
Da
t
e

:

3
/
2
6
/
1
6
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r

:

Bo
r
r
o
w

S
o
u
r
c
e

:
MD
D

p
c
f

O
p
t
.

%
M

W
D

(
p
c
f
)

%

M

D
D

(
p
c
f
)

%

C

%

R
e
q
.
ND
-

1
7

S
i
d
e

1

1

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
7
.
3

1
7
.
5

9
9
.
8

9
5
.
3
%

9
5
.
0
%
SF
D
C
-

6

S
i
d
e

1

1

N
/
A

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
8
.
4

1
6
.
4

1
0
1
.
7

9
7
.
2
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

1
8

S
i
d
e

2

1

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
8
.
1

1
7
.
8

1
0
0
.
3

9
5
.
8
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

1
9

S
i
d
e

1

2

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
9
.
2

1
6
.
2

1
0
2
.
6

9
8
.
0
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

2
0

S
i
d
e

2

2

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
6
.
9

1
7
.
2

9
9
.
7

9
5
.
3
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

2
1

S
i
d
e

1

3

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
8
.
0

1
7
.
1

1
0
0
.
8

9
6
.
2
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

2
2

S
i
d
e

2

3

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
8
.
5

1
7
.
8

1
0
0
.
6

9
6
.
1
%

9
5
.
0
%
SF
D
C
-

7

S
i
d
e

2

3

N
/
A

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
9
.
7

1
7
.
3

1
0
2
.
0

9
7
.
5
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

2
3

S
i
d
e

1

4

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
7
.
6

1
6
.
8

1
0
9
.
2

9
7
.
0
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

2
4

S
i
d
e

2

4

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
6
.
5

1
7
.
4

1
0
7
.
8

9
5
.
7
%

9
5
.
0
%
SF
D
C
-

8

S
i
d
e

2

4

N
/
A

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
7
.
4

1
5
.
3

1
1
0
.
5

9
8
.
1
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

2
5

S
i
d
e

1

5

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
6
.
2

1
6
.
2

1
0
8
.
6

9
6
.
5
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

2
6

S
i
d
e

2

5

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
6
.
7

1
5
.
3

1
0
9
.
9

9
7
.
6
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

2
7

S
i
d
e

1

6

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
7
.
4

1
7
.
4

1
0
8
.
5

9
6
.
4
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

2
8

S
i
d
e

2

6

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
6
.
4

1
7
.
1

1
0
7
.
9

9
5
.
9
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

2
9

S
i
d
e

1

7

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
5
.
4

1
7
.
2

1
0
7
.
0

9
5
.
0
%

9
5
.
0
%
SF
D
C
-

9

S
i
d
e

1

7

N
/
A

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
5
.
7

1
6
.
2

1
0
8
.
2

9
6
.
1
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

3
0

S
i
d
e

2

7

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
5
.
4

1
6
.
2

1
0
7
.
9

9
5
.
8
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

3
1

S
i
d
e

1

8

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
4
.
8

1
5
.
9

1
0
7
.
7

9
5
.
6
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

3
2

S
i
d
e

1

8

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
5
.
7

1
7
.
2

1
0
7
.
3

9
5
.
3
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

3
3

S
i
d
e

1

9

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
7
.
6

1
7
.
1

1
0
9
.
0

9
6
.
8
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

3
4

S
i
d
e

2

9

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
12
0
.
2

1
7
.
5

1
0
2
.
3

9
7
.
7
%

9
5
.
0
%
SF
D
C
-

1
0

S
i
d
e

2

9

N
/
A

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
12
2
.
0

1
6
.
7

1
0
4
.
5

9
9
.
8
%

9
5
.
0
%
Co
m
p
a
c
t
i
o
n

Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t

:
CA
T

1
0
0

F

R
o
l
l
e
r
,

S
a
k
a
i

S
V

5
0
5

P

R
o
l
l
e
r
Cl
i
e
n
t
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
m
e

:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

:
Fi
e
l
d

D
e
n
s
i
t
y

R
e
p
o
r
t
SF
F
D
R
-
0
3
Aa
r
o
n

S
m
i
t
h
Sm
i
t
h

+

G
a
r
d
n
e
r
,

I
n
c
.

Br
o
w
n
f
i
e
l
d

R
d
.

C
&
D

L
a
n
d
f
i
l
l
Pr
o
c
t
o
r

D
a
t
a
2/
1
0
/
1
6

t
o

2
/
1
2
/
1
6
Sh
a
n
n
o
n

S
i
s
e
l
l
Ba
x
t
e
r
-
J
o
h
n
s
o
n
On

S
i
t
e
-

E
x
c
a
v
a
t
e
d

f
r
o
m

b
a
s
i
n

o
f

p
o
n
d

d
a
m

t
o

b
e

u
s
e
d

f
o
r

p
o
n
d

d
a
m

e
m
b
a
n
k
m
e
n
t
Te
s
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

T
e
s
t

L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
/

Li
f
t
Ro
d

De
p
t
h
Pr
o
c
t
o
r

I
.
D
.

No
.
2/11/16
Me
a
s
u
r
e
d

I
n

P
l
a
c
e

C
o
m
p
a
c
t
i
o
n
Comments 2/10/16 2/10/16 2/10/16 2/10/16 2/10/16 2/10/16 2/10/16 2/10/16 2/11/162/11/16 2/11/16 2/11/16 2/11/16 2/11/16 2/11/16 2/11/16 2/11/16 2/11/16 2/11/16 2/11/16 2/11/16 2/11/16
Ga
u
g
e

N
u
m
b
e
r

G
a
u
g
e

M
o
d
e
l

D
e
n
s
i
t
y

C
o
u
n
t

M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e

C
o
u
n
t
24
6
5
6

3
4
4
0

1
8
8
5

5
7
8
Do
c
u
S
i
g
n

E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e

I
D
:

1
1
8
F
5
3
B
4
-
0
D
6
5
-
4
E
4
2
-
8
1
C
6
-
4
8
A
C
F
6
E
9
F
7
F
9

22
0
0

W
e
s
t
i
n
g
h
o
u
s
e

B
l
v
d
.
,

S
u
i
t
e

1
0
3

•

R
a
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
4

•

P
h
o
n
e

(
9
1
9
)

8
7
6
-
0
4
0
5

•

F
a
x

(
9
1
9
)

8
7
6
-
0
4
6
0

•

w
w
w
.
g
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
s
.
n
e
t

20
1
6
-
6
2
5
Re
p
o
r
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

:

G
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
s

R
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e

:

P
a
g e
:

1

o
f

1
Da
t
e

(s ) :
Re
v
i
e
w
e
d

B
y :
Da
t
e

:

3
/
2
6
/
1
6
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r

:

Bo
r
r
o
w

S
o
u
r
c
e

:
MD
D

p
c
f

O
p
t
.

%
M

W
D

(
p
c
f
)

%

M

D
D

(
p
c
f
)

%

C

%

R
e
q
.
ND
-

3
5

S
i
d
e

1

1
0

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
8
.
3

1
7
.
4

1
0
0
.
8

9
6
.
2
%

9
5
.
0
%
SF
D
C
-

1
1

S
i
d
e

1

1
0

N
/
A

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
9
.
7

1
6
.
3

1
0
2
.
9

9
8
.
3
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

3
6

S
i
d
e

2

1
0

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
9
.
2

1
7
.
2

1
0
1
.
7

9
7
.
1
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

3
7

S
i
d
e

1

1
1

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
12
0
.
6

1
6
.
8

1
0
3
.
3

9
8
.
6
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

3
8

S
i
d
e

2

1
1

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
9
.
1

1
6
.
0

1
0
2
.
7

9
8
.
1
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

3
9

S
i
d
e

1

1
2

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
8
.
0

1
8
.
0

1
0
0
.
0

9
5
.
5
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

4
0

S
i
d
e

2

1
2

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
12
0
.
8

1
7
.
8

1
0
2
.
5

9
7
.
9
%

9
5
.
0
%
SF
D
C
-

1
2

S
i
d
e

2

1
2

N
/
A

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
12
1
.
7

1
6
.
5

1
0
4
.
5

9
9
.
8
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

4
1

S
i
d
e

1

1
3

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
8
.
2

1
7
.
7

1
0
0
.
4

9
5
.
9
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

4
2

S
i
d
e

2

1
3

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
9
.
2

1
6
.
2

1
0
2
.
6

9
8
.
0
%

9
5
.
0
%
24
6
5
6
34
4
0
18
8
5
57
8
Ga
u
g
e

N
u
m
b
e
r

G
a
u
g
e

M
o
d
e
l

D
e
n
s
i
t
y

C
o
u
n
t

M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e

C
o
u
n
t
2/12/162/12/16
Me
a
s
u
r
e
d

I
n

P
l
a
c
e

C
o
m
p
a
c
t
i
o
n
Comments 2/12/16 2/12/16 2/12/16 2/12/16 2/12/16 2/12/16 2/12/16 2/12/16
Te
s
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

T
e
s
t

L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
/

Li
f
t
Ro
d

De
p
t
h
Pr
o
c
t
o
r

I
.
D
.

No
.
Pr
o
c
t
o
r

D
a
t
a
2/
1
0
/
1
6

t
o

2
/
1
2
/
1
6
Sh
a
n
n
o
n

S
i
s
e
l
l
Ba
x
t
e
r
-
J
o
h
n
s
o
n
On

S
i
t
e
-

E
x
c
a
v
a
t
e
d

f
r
o
m

b
a
s
i
n

o
f

p
o
n
d

d
a
m

t
o

b
e

u
s
e
d

f
o
r

p
o
n
d

d
a
m

e
m
b
a
n
k
m
e
n
t
Co
m
p
a
c
t
i
o
n

Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t

:
CA
T

1
0
0

F

R
o
l
l
e
r
,

S
a
k
a
i

S
V

5
0
5

P

R
o
l
l
e
r
Cl
i
e
n
t
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
m
e

:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

:
Fi
e
l
d

D
e
n
s
i
t
y

R
e
p
o
r
t
SF
F
D
R
-
0
3
Aa
r
o
n

S
m
i
t
h
Sm
i
t
h

+

G
a
r
d
n
e
r
,

I
n
c
.

Br
o
w
n
f
i
e
l
d

R
d
.

C
&
D

L
a
n
d
f
i
l
l
Do
c
u
S
i
g
n

E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e

I
D
:

1
1
8
F
5
3
B
4
-
0
D
6
5
-
4
E
4
2
-
8
1
C
6
-
4
8
A
C
F
6
E
9
F
7
F
9

22
0
0

W
e
s
t
i
n
g
h
o
u
s
e

B
l
v
d
.
,

S
u
i
t
e

1
0
3

•

R
a
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
4

•

P
h
o
n
e

(
9
1
9
)

8
7
6
-
0
4
0
5

•

F
a
x

(
9
1
9
)

8
7
6
-
0
4
6
0

•

w
w
w
.
g
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
s
.
n
e
t

Sm
i
t
h
+
G
a
r
d
n
e
r
,

I
n
c
.
Br
o
w
n
f
i
e
l
d

R
d
.

C
&
D

L
a
n
d
f
i
l
l
20
1
6
-
6
2
5
Re
p
o
r
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

:

G
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
s

R
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e

:

P
a
g e
:

1

o
f

1
Da
t
e

(s ) :
Re
v
i
e
w
e
d

B
y :
Da
t
e

:

4
/
4
/
1
6
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r

:

Bo
r
r
o
w

S
o
u
r
c
e

:
MD
D

p
c
f

O
p
t
.

%
M

W
D

(
p
c
f
)

%

M

D
D

(
p
c
f
)

%

C

%

R
e
q
.
ND
-

4
3

S
i
d
e

1

1
3

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
12
0
.
2

1
7
.
8

1
0
2
.
0

9
7
.
5
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

4
4

S
i
d
e

2

1
3

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
9
.
7

1
7
.
4

1
0
2
.
0

9
7
.
4
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

4
5

S
i
d
e

1

1
4

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
7
.
4

1
6
.
8

1
0
0
.
5

9
6
.
0
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

4
6

S
i
d
e

2

1
4

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
9
.
6

1
7
.
4

1
0
1
.
9

9
7
.
3
%

9
5
.
0
%
DC
N
D
-

1
3

S
i
d
e

2

1
4

N
/
A

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
7
.
9

1
6
.
4

1
0
1
.
3

9
6
.
7
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

4
7

S
i
d
e

1

1
5

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
12
0
.
7

1
7
.
3

1
0
2
.
9

9
8
.
3
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

4
8

S
i
d
e

2

1
5

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
12
2
.
1

1
6
.
0

1
0
5
.
3

1
0
0
.
5
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

4
9

S
i
d
e

1

1
6

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
12
0
.
6

1
7
.
1

1
0
3
.
0

9
8
.
4
%

9
5
.
0
%
DC
N
D
-

1
4

S
i
d
e

1

1
6

N
/
A

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
8
.
4

1
6
.
2

1
0
1
.
9

9
7
.
3
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

5
0

S
i
d
e

2

1
6

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
7
.
2

1
5
.
4

1
0
1
.
6

9
7
.
0
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

5
1

S
i
d
e

1

1
7

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
12
0
.
4

1
7
.
0

1
0
2
.
9

9
8
.
3
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

5
2

S
i
d
e

2

1
7

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
7
.
4

1
6
.
2

1
0
1
.
0

9
6
.
5
%

9
5
.
0
%
DC
N
D
-

1
5

S
i
d
e

1

1
7

N
/
A

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
9
.
4

1
5
.
4

1
0
3
.
5

9
8
.
8
%

9
5
.
0
%
Co
m
p
a
c
t
i
o
n

Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t

:
CA
T

1
0
0

F

R
o
l
l
e
r
,

S
a
k
a
i

S
V

5
0
5

P

R
o
l
l
e
r
Cl
i
e
n
t
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
m
e

:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

:
Fi
e
l
d

D
e
n
s
i
t
y

R
e
p
o
r
t
SF
F
D
R
-
0
4
Aa
r
o
n

S
m
i
t
h
Pr
o
c
t
o
r

D
a
t
a
2/
1
7
/
1
6
,

2
/
1
8
/
1
6

S
h
a
n
n
o
n

S
i
s
e
l
l
Ba
x
t
e
r
-
J
o
h
n
s
o
n
On

S
i
t
e
-

E
x
c
a
v
a
t
e
d

f
r
o
m

b
a
s
i
n

o
f

p
o
n
d

d
a
m

t
o

b
e

u
s
e
d

f
o
r

p
o
n
d

d
a
m

e
m
b
a
n
k
m
e
n
t
Te
s
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

T
e
s
t

L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
/

Li
f
t
Ro
d

De
p
t
h
Pr
o
c
t
o
r

I
.
D
.

No
.
2/18/16
Me
a
s
u
r
e
d

I
n

P
l
a
c
e

C
o
m
p
a
c
t
i
o
n
Comments 2/17/16 2/17/16 2/17/16 2/17/16 2/17/16 2/18/16 2/18/16 2/18/16 2/18/16 2/18/16 2/18/16 2/18/16
Ga
u
g
e

N
u
m
b
e
r

G
a
u
g
e

M
o
d
e
l

D
e
n
s
i
t
y

C
o
u
n
t

M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e

C
o
u
n
t
24
6
5
6

3
4
4
0

1
9
1
4

5
8
0
Do
c
u
S
i
g
n

E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e

I
D
:

1
1
8
F
5
3
B
4
-
0
D
6
5
-
4
E
4
2
-
8
1
C
6
-
4
8
A
C
F
6
E
9
F
7
F
9

22
0
0

W
e
s
t
i
n
g
h
o
u
s
e

B
l
v
d
.
,

S
u
i
t
e

1
0
3

•

R
a
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
4

•

P
h
o
n
e

(
9
1
9
)

8
7
6
-
0
4
0
5

•

F
a
x

(
9
1
9
)

8
7
6
-
0
4
6
0

•

w
w
w
.
g
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
s
.
n
e
t

Sm
i
t
h

+

G
a
r
d
n
e
r
,

I
n
c
.
Br
o
w
n
f
i
e
l
d

R
d
.

C
&
D

L
a
n
d
f
i
l
l
20
1
6
-
6
2
5
Re
p
o
r
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

:

G
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
s

R
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e

:

P
a
g e
:

1

o
f

1
Da
t
e

(s ) :
Re
v
i
e
w
e
d

B
y :
Da
t
e

:

4
/
7
/
1
6
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r

:

Bo
r
r
o
w

S
o
u
r
c
e

:
MD
D

p
c
f

O
p
t
.

%
M

W
D

(
p
c
f
)

%

M

D
D

(
p
c
f
)

%

C

%

R
e
q
.
ND
-

5
3

3
0
'

L
i
f
t

5

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
5
.
9

1
6
.
7

1
0
7
.
9

9
5
.
8
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

5
4

1
7
0
'

L
i
f
t

5

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
4
.
8

1
6
.
2

1
0
7
.
4

9
5
.
4
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
D
C
-

1
6

1
7
0
'

L
i
f
t

5

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
6
.
8

1
6
.
7

1
0
8
.
7

9
6
.
5
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

5
5

3
1
0
'

L
i
f
t

5

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
5
.
5

1
7
.
3

1
0
7
.
0

9
5
.
0
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

5
6

3
0
'

L
i
f
t

6

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
6
.
4

1
6
.
5

1
0
8
.
5

9
6
.
4
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

5
7

1
7
0

L
i
f
t

6

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
4
.
9

1
5
.
4

1
0
8
.
2

9
6
.
1
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

5
8

3
1
0
'

L
i
f
t

6

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
9
.
4

1
6
.
0

1
1
1
.
6

9
9
.
1
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

5
9

3
0
'

L
i
f
t

7

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
6
.
4

1
5
.
9

1
0
9
.
1

9
6
.
9
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
D
C
-

1
7

3
0
'

L
i
f
t

7

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
7
.
2

1
5
.
1

1
1
0
.
5

9
8
.
1
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

6
0

1
7
0
'

L
i
f
t

7

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
5
.
4

1
7
.
0

1
0
7
.
2

9
5
.
2
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

6
1

3
1
0
'

L
i
f
t

7

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
6
.
8

1
7
.
4

1
0
8
.
0

9
5
.
9
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

6
2

5
0
'

L
i
f
t

8

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
7
.
5

1
7
.
4

1
0
8
.
6

9
6
.
5
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
D
C
-

1
8

5
0
'

L
i
f
t

8

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
7
.
3

1
7
.
8

1
0
8
.
1

9
6
.
0
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

6
3

1
5
0
'

L
i
f
t

8

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
12
3
.
4

2
0
.
9

1
0
2
.
1

9
7
.
5
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

6
4

5
0
'

L
i
f
t

9

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
12
1
.
7

1
6
.
6

1
0
4
.
4

9
9
.
7
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

6
5

1
5
0
'

L
i
f
t

9

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
12
1
.
6

1
6
.
7

1
0
4
.
2

9
9
.
5
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

6
6

7
5
'

L
i
f
t

1
0

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
5
.
1

1
5
.
3

9
9
.
8

9
5
.
3
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
D
C
-

1
9

7
5
'

L
i
f
t

1
0

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
5
.
5

1
5
.
9

9
9
.
7

9
5
.
2
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

6
7

1
7
5
'

L
i
f
t

1
0

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
5
.
2

1
5
.
7

1
0
8
.
2

9
6
.
1
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

6
8

7
5
'

L
i
f
t

1
1

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
9
.
4

1
8
.
2

1
0
1
.
0

9
6
.
5
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

6
9

2
0
0
'

L
i
f
t

1
1

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
12
0
.
0

1
7
.
9

1
0
1
.
8

9
7
.
2
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

7
0

5
0
'

L
i
f
t

1
2

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
0
.
6

1
2
.
6

1
0
7
.
1

9
5
.
1
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

7
1

1
5
0
'

L
i
f
t

1
2

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
1
.
5

1
2
.
9

1
0
7
.
6

9
5
.
6
%

9
5
.
0
%
3/
9
/
1
6
3/
1
0
/
1
6

t
o

3
/
1
1
/
1
6
24
6
5
6
34
4
0
21
7
9
71
0
20
7
2
2
34
3
0
1927 6383/11/16 3/11/16
Ga
u
g
e

N
u
m
b
e
r

G
a
u
g
e

M
o
d
e
l

D
e
n
s
i
t
y

C
o
u
n
t

M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e

C
o
u
n
t

G
a
u
g
e

N
u
m
b
e
r

G
a
u
g
e

M
o
d
e
l

D
e
n
s
i
t
y

C
o
u
n
t

M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e

C
o
u
n
t
3/11/163/9/16 3/9/16 3/10/16 3/10/16 3/10/16 3/10/16 3/10/16 3/11/16 3/11/16 3/11/16 3/11/163/9/16
Me
a
s
u
r
e
d

I
n

P
l
a
c
e

C
o
m
p
a
c
t
i
o
n
Comments 3/9/16 3/9/16 3/9/16 3/9/16 3/9/16 3/9/16 3/9/16 3/9/16
Te
s
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

T
e
s
t

L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
/

Li
f
t
Ro
d

De
p
t
h
Pr
o
c
t
o
r

I
.
D
.

No
.
Pr
o
c
t
o
r

D
a
t
a
2/
1
7
/
1
6
,

2
/
1
8
/
1
6
Sh
a
n
n
o
n

F
.

S
i
s
e
l
l
Ba
x
t
e
r
-
J
o
h
n
s
o
n
On

S
i
t
e
-

E
x
c
a
v
a
t
e
d

f
r
o
m

b
a
s
i
n

o
f

p
o
n
d

d
a
m

t
o

b
e

u
s
e
d

f
o
r

p
o
n
d

d
a
m

e
m
b
a
n
k
m
e
n
t
Co
m
p
a
c
t
i
o
n

Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t

:
CA
T

1
0
0

F

R
o
l
l
e
r
,

S
a
k
a
i

S
V

5
0
5

P

R
o
l
l
e
r
Cl
i
e
n
t
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
m
e

:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

:
Fi
e
l
d

D
e
n
s
i
t
y

R
e
p
o
r
t
SF
F
D
R
-
0
5
Aa
r
o
n

S
m
i
t
h
Do
c
u
S
i
g
n

E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e

I
D
:

1
1
8
F
5
3
B
4
-
0
D
6
5
-
4
E
4
2
-
8
1
C
6
-
4
8
A
C
F
6
E
9
F
7
F
9

22
0
0

W
e
s
t
i
n
g
h
o
u
s
e

B
l
v
d
.
,

S
u
i
t
e

1
0
3

•

R
a
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
4

•

P
h
o
n
e

(
9
1
9
)

8
7
6
-
0
4
0
5

•

F
a
x

(
9
1
9
)

8
7
6
-
0
4
6
0

•

w
w
w
.
g
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
s
.
n
e
t

Sm
i
t
h

+

G
a
r
d
n
e
r
,

I
n
c
.
Br
o
w
n
f
i
e
l
d

R
d
.

C
&
D

L
a
n
d
f
i
l
l
20
1
6
-
6
2
5
Re
p
o
r
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

:

G
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
s

R
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e

:

P
a
g e
:

1

o
f

1
Da
t
e

(s ) :
Re
v
i
e
w
e
d

B
y :
Da
t
e

:

4
/
7
/
1
6
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r

:

Bo
r
r
o
w

S
o
u
r
c
e

:
MD
D

p
c
f

O
p
t
.

%
M

W
D

(
p
c
f
)

%

M

D
D

(
p
c
f
)

%

C

%

R
e
q
.
ND
-

7
2

2
2
5
'

L
i
f
t

1
2

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
7
.
2

1
7
.
9

1
0
7
.
9

9
5
.
8
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

7
3

7
5
'

L
i
f
t

1
3

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
4
.
1

1
4
.
6

9
9
.
6

9
5
.
1
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

7
4

2
0
0
'

L
i
f
t

1
3

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
4
.
6

1
4
.
5

1
0
0
.
1

9
5
.
6
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

7
5

7
5
'

L
i
f
t

1
4

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
3
.
7

1
2
.
8

1
0
9
.
7

9
7
.
4
%

9
5
.
0
%
DC
-

2
0

7
5
'

L
i
f
t

1
4

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
4
-
0
0
1

1
1
2
.
6

1
5
.
3
12
4
.
5

1
3
.
1

1
1
0
.
1

9
7
.
8
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

7
6

T
i
e
-
i
n

a
r
e
a

L
i
f
t

1

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
1
.
0

1
1
.
4

9
9
.
6

9
5
.
2
%

9
5
.
0
%
ND
-

7
7

T
i
e
-
i
n

a
r
e
a

L
i
f
t

2

6
"

6
2
5
-
0
0
3
-
0
0
1

1
0
4
.
7

1
5
.
8
11
4
.
6

1
2
.
0

1
0
2
.
3

9
7
.
7
%

9
5
.
0
%
Te
s
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

T
e
s
t

L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
/

Li
f
t
Ro
d

De
p
t
h
Sh
a
n
n
o
n

S
i
s
e
l
l
3/
1
4
-
3
/
1
9
Ba
x
t
e
r
-
J
o
h
n
s
o
n
On

S
i
t
e
CA
T

1
0
0

F

R
o
l
l
e
r
,

S
a
k
a
i

S
V

5
0
5

P

R
o
l
l
e
r
Fi
e
l
d

D
e
n
s
i
t
y

R
e
p
o
r
t
Co
m
p
a
c
t
i
o
n

Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t

:
SF
F
D
R
-
6
Cl
i
e
n
t
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
m
e

:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

N
u
m
b
e
r

:
Pr
o
c
t
o
r

I
.
D
.

No
.
Pr
o
c
t
o
r

D
a
t
a
Er
i
k

L
i
n
d
q
u
i
s
t
Me
a
s
u
r
e
d

I
n

P
l
a
c
e

C
o
m
p
a
c
t
i
o
n
Comments 3/14/16 3/14/16 3/14/16 3/15/16 3/15/16 3/15/16 3/15/16
Ga
u
g
e

M
o
d
e
l
Ga
u
g
e

N
u
m
b
e
r

M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e

C
o
u
n
t
De
n
s
i
t
y

C
o
u
n
t
20
7
2
2

3
4
3
0

1
9
2
7

6
3
8
Do
c
u
S
i
g
n

E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e

I
D
:

1
1
8
F
5
3
B
4
-
0
D
6
5
-
4
E
4
2
-
8
1
C
6
-
4
8
A
C
F
6
E
9
F
7
F
9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
Smith+Gardner
Brown field Rd C&D Landfill
2016-625
Report Number :Geotechnics Representative :Page : 1 of 1
Date (s) :Reviewed By : MPS Date : 4/26/16
Contractor :Borrow Source :
MDD pcf Opt. %M WD (pcf) % M DD (pcf) % C % Req.
ND 78 S. END ACCESS RD -5 6" 625-005-001 105.0 17.3 125.4 17.9 106.4 101.3% 95.0%
ND 79 S. END ACCESS RD -4 6" 625-005-001 105.0 17.3 122.1 16.6 104.7 99.7% 95.0%
ND 80 S. END ACCESS RD -4 6" 625-005-001 105.0 17.3 126.0 16.0 108.6 103.4% 95.0%
ND 81 S. END ACCESS RD -3 6" 625-005-001 105.0 17.3 123.0 17.2 104.9 100.0% 95.0%
ND 82 S. END ACCESS RD -3 6" 625-005-001 105.0 17.3 124.5 17.5 106.0 100.9% 95.0%
ND 83 S. END ACCESS RD -2 6" 625-005-001 105.0 17.3 123.2 16.4 105.8 100.8% 95.0%
ND 84 S. END ACCESS RD -2 6" 625-005-001 105.0 17.3 124.0 18.1 105.0 100.0% 95.0%
ND 85 S. END ACCESS RD -1.5 6" 625-005-001 105.0 17.3 124.3 17.6 105.7 100.7% 95.0%
ND 86 S. END ACCESS RD -1.5 6" 625-005-001 105.0 17.3 125.1 19.1 105.0 100.0% 95.0%
ND 87 S. END ACCESS RD -1 6" 625-005-001 105.0 17.3 126.4 19.4 105.9 100.8% 95.0%
ND 88 S. END ACCESS RD -1 6" 625-005-001 105.0 17.3 125.9 18.6 106.2 101.1% 95.0%
ND 89 S. END ACCESS RD -0.5 6" 625-005-001 105.0 17.3 123.7 17.9 104.9 99.9% 95.0%
ND 90 S. END ACCESS RD -0.5 6" 625-005-001 105.0 17.3 126.3 18.3 106.8 101.7% 95.0%
ND 91 S. END ACCESS RD SG 6" 625-005-001 105.0 17.3 125.8 17.7 106.9 101.8% 95.0%
DC 21 S. END ACCESS RD SG 6" 625-005-001 105.0 17.3 124.5 16.2 107.1 102.0% 95.0%
ND 92 S. END ACCESS RD SG 6" 625-005-001 105.0 17.3 125.0 18.0 105.9 100.9% 95.0%
Field Density Report
Compaction
Equipment :
Test Number Test Location Elevation/
Lift
Rod
Depth
SFFDR-7
3/16-3/18
Proctor I.D.
No.
Proctor Data Measured In Place
3/18/2016
Brandon Thomas
Compaction Comments
Baxter-Johnson On Site
CAT 100 F Roller, Sakai SV 505 P Roller
3/17/2016
Client:
Project Name :
Project Number :
3/18/2016
3/18/2016
3/18/2016
3/18/2016
3/18/2016
3/17/2016
3/17/2016
3/17/2016
3/16/2016
3/16/2016
3/16/2016
3/16/2016
3/16/2016
3/17/2016
Gauge ModelGauge Number Moisture CountDensity Count
32387 3430 2202 678
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net

ATTERBERG LIMIT
ASTM D 4318-10
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC. Boring No.NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft)NA
Project No.2016-625-001 Sample No. BS-1
Lab ID 2016-625-001-001 Visual Description BROWN
( MInus No. 40 sieve material, Wet Method)
NON - PLASTIC
MATERIAL
Tested By TB Date 2/1/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/2/16
page 1 of 1 DCN: CT-S4C DATE: 7-11-97 REVISION : 2T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-001-002 Limit-(NP).xls]Sheet1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC. Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No. 2016-625-001 Sample No. BS-1
Lab ID 2016-625-001-001 Soil Color BROWN
SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER
USCS cobbles gravel sand silt and clay fraction
USDA cobbles gravel sand silt clay
USCS Summary
Sieve Sizes (mm) Percentage
Greater Than #4 Gravel 16.00
#4 To #200 Sand 67.55
Finer Than #200 Silt & Clay 16.45
USCS Symbol SM, TESTED (NON PLASTIC FINES)
USCS Classification SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL
page 1 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-001-001 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.0010.010.11101001000
Pe
r
c
e
n
t

F
i
n
e
r

B
y

W
e
i
g
h
t
Particle Diameter (mm)
12" 6" 3" 2" 1" 3/4" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #140 #200
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
USDA CLASSIFICATION CHART
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No.2016-625-001 Sample No. BS-1
Lab ID 2016-625-001-001 Soil Color BROWN
Particle Percent USDA SUMMARY Actual Corrected % of Minus 2.0 mm
Size (mm)Finer Percentage material for USDA Classificat.
Gravel 29.61 0.00
2 70.39 Sand 55.33 78.61
0.05 15.06 Silt 10.42 14.80
0.002 4.64 Clay 4.64 6.59
USDA Classification: LOAMY SAND
page 2 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-001-001 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
0102030405060708090100
PERCENT SAND
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10 90
8
7
6
5
4
3
20
10
CLAY
SANDY CLAY
SANDY CLAY LOAM
SANDY LOAM
SAND
LOAM
SILT LOAM
SILT
CLAY LOAM SILTY CLAY LOAM
SILTY CLAY
LOAMY
SAND
PERCENT SILT
PERCENT CLAY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
WASH SIEVE ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No.NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No.2016-625-001 Sample No. BS-1
Lab ID 2016-625-001-001 Soil Color BROWN
Minus #10 for Hygroscopic Moisture Content Hydrometer Specimen Data
Tare No.E-2 Air Dried - #10 Hydrometer Material (g)50.00
Wgt.Tare + Wet Soil (g)37.41 Corrected Dry Wt. of - #10 Material (g)45.19
Wgt.Tare + Dry Soil (g)35.98
Weight of Tare (g)22.54 Weight of - #200 Material (g)10.56
Weight of Water (g)1.43 Weight of - #10 ; + #200 Material (g)34.63
Weight of Dry Soil (g)13.44
Moisture Content (%)10.6 J-FACTOR (%FINER THAN #10)0.7039
Soil Specimen Data
Tare No.165
Wgt.Tare + Air Dry Soil (g)958.43
Weight of Tare (g)237.36
Air Dried Wgt. Total Sample (g) 721.07 Dry Weight of Material Retained on #10 (g) 198.61Total Dry Sample Weight (g) 670.83 Corrected Dry Sample Wt - #10 (g)472.22
Sieve Sieve Wgt.of Soil Percent Accumulated Percent Accumulated
Size Opening Retained Retained Percent Finer Percent
(mm)Retained Finer
(gm)(%) (%)(%)(%)
12" 300 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
6" 150 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
3" 75 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
2" 50 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1 1/2" 37.5 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1" 25.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
3/4" 19.0 11.24 1.7 1.7 98.3 98.3
1/2" 12.5 8.22 1.2 2.9 97.1 97.1
3/8" 9.50 20.75 3.1 6.0 94.0 94.0
#4 4.75 67.10 10.0 16.0 84.0 84.0
#10 2.00 91.30 13.6 29.6 70.4 70.4
#20 0.85 6.71 14.8 14.8 85.2 59.9
#40 0.425 10.17 22.5 37.4 62.6 44.1
#60 0.250 7.40 16.4 53.7 46.3 32.6
#140 0.106 8.18 18.1 71.8 28.2 19.8
#200 0.075 2.17 4.8 76.6 23.4 16.5
Pan -10.56 23.4 100.0 --
Notes :
Tested By EL Date 2/3/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/4/16
page 3 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-001-001 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No.2016-625-001 Sample No. BS-1
Lab ID 2016-625-001-001 Soil Color BROWN
Elapsed R Temp.Composite RNKDiameterN'
Time Measured ( o C )Correction Corrected ( % ) Factor ( mm ) ( % )
(min)
0NANANANANANANANA
2 13.0 22.6 4.38 8.6 20.1 0.01452 0.0386 14.2
5 11.0 22.7 4.35 6.6 15.5 0.01450 0.0247 10.9
15 10.0 22.7 4.35 5.6 13.2 0.01450 0.0143 9.3
30 9.0 22.7 4.35 4.6 10.9 0.01450 0.0102 7.6
60 8.0 22.7 4.35 3.6 8.5 0.01450 0.0072 6.0
250 7.5 23.3 4.17 3.3 7.8 0.01440 0.0035 5.5
1440 7.0 22.4 4.44 2.6 6.0 0.01455 0.0015 4.2
Soil Specimen Data Other Corrections
Wgt. of Dry Material (g) 45.19 Hygroscopic Moisture Factor 0.904
Weight of Deflocculant (g) 5.0
a - Factor 1.056
Percent Finer than # 10 70.39
Specific Gravity 2.37 Assumed
Notes:
Tested By TB Date 2/1/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/4/16
page 4 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-001-001 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
ASTM D698-12
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No.: NA
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft): NA
Project No.:2016-625-001 Sample No.: BS-1
Lab ID:2016-625-001-001 Test Method STANDARD
Visual Description: BROWN SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL
Optimum Water Content 12.1
Maximum Dry Density 118.3
Tested By AMS Date 2/4/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/5/16
page 1 of 2 DCN:CT-S12 DATE:5/1/13 REVISION: 14 PROCTOR.xls
105
110
115
120
125
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
De
n
s
i
t
y

(
p
c
f
)
Water Content (%)
Specific Gravity 2.70
Assumed
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
MOISTURE - DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
ASTM D698-12
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No.: NA
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft): NA
Project No.:2016-625-001 Sample No.: BS-1
Lab ID:2016-625-001-001
Visual Description: BROWN SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL
Total Weight of the Sample (g) 19100 Test Type STANDARD
As Received Water Content (%)NA Rammer Weight (lb)5.5
Assumed Specific Gravity 2.70 Rammer Drop (in)12
Rammer Type MECHANICAL
Percent Retained on 3/4" 2 Machine ID R 174
Percent Retained on 3/8" 6 Mold ID R 173
Percent Retained on #4 NA Mold diameter 6'
Oversize Material Not included Weight of the Mold (g)5531
Procedure Used A Volume of the Mold (cm3)2119
Mold / Specimen
Point No.123 4 5
Wt. of Mold & Wet Sample (g)9608 9814 10020 10045 9963
Wt.of Mold (g)5531 5531 5531 5531 5531
Wt. of Wet Sample (g)4078 4284 4490 4515 4433
Mold Volume (cm3)2119 2119 2119 2119 2119
Moisture Content / Density
Tare Number 310 821 815 305 300
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g)401.90 450.70 440.30 416.50 433.80
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g)382.20 423.50 408.40 375.80 388.00
Wt. of Tare (g)111.90 130.90 138.10 84.80 110.90
Wt. of Water (g)19.70 27.20 31.90 40.70 45.80
Wt. of Dry Sample (g)270.30 292.60 270.30 291.00 277.10
Wet Density (g/cm3)1.92 2.02 2.12 2.13 2.09
Wet Density (pcf) 120.1 126.1 132.2 132.9 130.5
Moisture Content (%) 7.3 9.3 11.8 14.0 16.5
Dry Density (pcf) 111.9 115.4 118.2 116.6 112.0
Zero Air Voids
Moisture Content (%)15.0 17.0 19.5
Dry Unit Weight (pcf)119.9 115.5 110.4
Tested By AMS Date 2/4/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/5/16
page 2 of 2 DCN:CT-S12 DATE:5/1/13 REVISION: 14 PROCTOR.xls
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net

ATTERBERG LIMIT
ASTM D 4318-10
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC. Boring No.NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft)NA
Project No.2016-625-001 Sample No. BS-2
Lab ID 2016-625-001-002 Visual Description TAN
( MInus No. 40 sieve material, Wet Method)
NON - PLASTIC
MATERIAL
Tested By TB Date 2/1/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/2/16
page 1 of 1 DCN: CT-S4C DATE: 7-11-97 REVISION : 2T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-001-002 Limit-(NP).xls]Sheet1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC. Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No. 2016-625-001 Sample No. BS-2
Lab ID 2016-625-001-002 Soil Color TAN
SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER
USCS cobbles gravel sand silt and clay fraction
USDA cobbles gravel sand silt clay
USCS Summary
Sieve Sizes (mm) Percentage
Greater Than #4 Gravel 7.96
#4 To #200 Sand 68.37
Finer Than #200 Silt & Clay 23.67
USCS Symbol SM, TESTED (NON PLASTIC FINES)
USCS Classification SILTY SAND
page 1 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-001-002 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.0010.010.11101001000
Pe
r
c
e
n
t

F
i
n
e
r

B
y

W
e
i
g
h
t
Particle Diameter (mm)
12" 6" 3" 2" 1" 3/4" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #140 #200
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
USDA CLASSIFICATION CHART
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No.2016-625-001 Sample No. BS-2
Lab ID 2016-625-001-002 Soil Color TAN
Particle Percent USDA SUMMARY Actual Corrected % of Minus 2.0 mm
Size (mm)Finer Percentage material for USDA Classificat.
Gravel 11.13 0.00
2 88.87 Sand 69.77 78.51
0.05 19.10 Silt 16.36 18.41
0.002 2.74 Clay 2.74 3.09
USDA Classification: LOAMY SAND
page 2 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-001-002 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
0102030405060708090100
PERCENT SAND
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10 90
8
7
6
5
4
3
20
10
CLAY
SANDY CLAY
SANDY CLAY LOAM
SANDY LOAM
SAND
LOAM
SILT LOAM
SILT
CLAY LOAM SILTY CLAY LOAM
SILTY CLAY
LOAMY
SAND
PERCENT SILT
PERCENT CLAY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
WASH SIEVE ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No.NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No.2016-625-001 Sample No. BS-2
Lab ID 2016-625-001-002 Soil Color TAN
Minus #10 for Hygroscopic Moisture Content Hydrometer Specimen Data
Tare No.P-1 Air Dried - #10 Hydrometer Material (g)50.00
Wgt.Tare + Wet Soil (g)35.27 Corrected Dry Wt. of - #10 Material (g)44.17
Wgt.Tare + Dry Soil (g)33.76
Weight of Tare (g)22.31 Weight of - #200 Material (g)11.76
Weight of Water (g)1.51 Weight of - #10 ; + #200 Material (g)32.41
Weight of Dry Soil (g)11.45
Moisture Content (%)13.2 J-FACTOR (%FINER THAN #10)0.8887
Soil Specimen Data
Tare No.164
Wgt.Tare + Air Dry Soil (g)1343.94
Weight of Tare (g)242.72
Air Dried Wgt. Total Sample (g) 1101.22 Dry Weight of Material Retained on #10 (g) 109.69Total Dry Sample Weight (g) 985.69 Corrected Dry Sample Wt - #10 (g)876.00
Sieve Sieve Wgt.of Soil Percent Accumulated Percent Accumulated
Size Opening Retained Retained Percent Finer Percent
(mm)Retained Finer
(gm)(%) (%)(%)(%)
12" 300 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
6" 150 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
3" 75 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
2" 50 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1 1/2" 37.5 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1" 25.0 50.40 5.1 5.1 94.9 94.9
3/4" 19.0 12.72 1.3 6.4 93.6 93.6
1/2" 12.5 0.00 0.0 6.4 93.6 93.6
3/8" 9.50 8.60 0.9 7.3 92.7 92.7
#4 4.75 6.73 0.7 8.0 92.0 92.0
#10 2.00 31.24 3.2 11.1 88.9 88.9
#20 0.85 2.97 6.7 6.7 93.3 82.9
#40 0.425 8.69 19.7 26.4 73.6 65.4
#60 0.250 7.25 16.4 42.8 57.2 50.8
#140 0.106 10.40 23.5 66.4 33.6 29.9
#200 0.075 3.10 7.0 73.4 26.6 23.7
Pan -11.76 26.6 100.0 --
Notes :
Tested By EL Date 2/3/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/4/16
page 3 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-001-002 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No.2016-625-001 Sample No. BS-2
Lab ID 2016-625-001-002 Soil Color TAN
Elapsed R Temp.Composite RNKDiameterN'
Time Measured ( o C )Correction Corrected ( % ) Factor ( mm ) ( % )
(min)
0NANANANANANANANA
2 12.0 22.7 4.35 7.6 18.3 0.01450 0.0388 16.2
5 10.0 22.7 4.35 5.6 13.5 0.01450 0.0248 12.0
15 9.0 22.7 4.35 4.6 11.1 0.01450 0.0144 9.9
30 8.0 22.7 4.35 3.6 8.7 0.01450 0.0102 7.8
60 7.0 22.8 4.32 2.7 6.4 0.01448 0.0073 5.7
250 6.0 23.3 4.17 1.8 4.4 0.01440 0.0036 3.9
1440 5.5 22.3 4.48 1.0 2.4 0.01457 0.0015 2.2
Soil Specimen Data Other Corrections
Wgt. of Dry Material (g) 44.17 Hygroscopic Moisture Factor 0.883
Weight of Deflocculant (g) 5.0
a - Factor 1.056
Percent Finer than # 10 88.87
Specific Gravity 2.37 Assumed
Notes:
Tested By TB Date 2/1/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/4/16
page 4 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-001-002 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net

MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
ASTM D698-12
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No.: NA
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft):NA
Project No.:2016-625-001 Sample No.: BS-2
Lab ID:2016-625-001-002 Test Method STANDARD
Visual Description: TAN SILTY SAND
Optimum Water Content 13.0
Maximum Dry Density 110.0
Tested By AMS Date 2/4/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/5/16
page 1 of 2 DCN:CT-S12 DATE:5/1/13 REVISION: 14 PROCTOR.xls
95
100
105
110
115
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
De
n
s
i
t
y

(
p
c
f
)
Water Content (%)
Specific Gravity 2.70Assumed
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net

MOISTURE - DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
ASTM D698-12
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No.: NA
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft):NA
Project No.:2016-625-001 Sample No.: BS-2
Lab ID:2016-625-001-002
Visual Description: TAN SILTY SAND
Total Weight of the Sample (g)19300 Test Type STANDARD
As Received Water Content (%)NA Rammer Weight (lb)5.5
Assumed Specific Gravity 2.70 Rammer Drop (in)12
Rammer Type MECHANICAL
Percent Retained on 3/4" 1 Machine ID R 174
Percent Retained on 3/8" 1 Mold ID R 461
Percent Retained on #4 NA Mold diameter 4"
Oversize Material Not included Weight of the Mold (g)4161
Procedure Used B
Volume of the Mold (cm3)942
Mold / Specimen
Point No.123 4 5
Wt. of Mold & Wet Sample (g)5856 5986 6044 6063 6040
Wt.of Mold (g)4161 4161 4161 4161 4161
Wt. of Wet Sample (g)1696 1826 1883 1903 1879
Mold Volume (cm3)942 942 942 942 942
Moisture Content / Density
Tare Number 314 312 368 307 866
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g)432.30 401.10 426.80 432.00 421.80
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g)410.50 370.50 389.40 388.70 370.90
Wt. of Tare (g)84.50 84.30 111.10 109.90 86.50
Wt. of Water (g)21.80 30.60 37.40 43.30 50.90
Wt. of Dry Sample (g)326.00 286.20 278.30 278.80 284.40
Wet Density (g/cm3)1.80 1.94 2.00 2.02 2.00
Wet Density (pcf)112.3 121.0 124.7 126.1 124.5
Moisture Content (%) 6.7 10.7 13.4 15.5 17.9
Dry Density (pcf) 105.3 109.3 110.0 109.1 105.6
Zero Air Voids
Moisture Content (%)19.0 21.0 24.0
Dry Unit Weight (pcf)111.4 107.5 102.2
Tested By AMS Date 2/4/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/5/16
page 2 of 2 DCN:CT-S12 DATE:5/1/13 REVISION: 14 PROCTOR.xls
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net

DCN: Data Transmittal Letter Date: 1/28/05 Rev.: 1

February 11, 2016

Project No. 2016-625-002 Mr. Carter Shore Smith + Gardner, Inc.
14 N. Boylan Ave. Raleigh, NC 27603
[e-mail]
Transmittal Laboratory Test Results Brownfield C & D Landfill Please find attached the laboratory test results for the above referenced project. The tests were outlined on the Project Verification Form that was transmitted to your firm prior to the testing. The testing was
performed in general accordance with the methods listed on the enclosed data sheets. The test results are believed to be representative of the samples that were submitted for testing and are indicative only of
the specimens which were evaluated. We have no direct knowledge of the origin of the samples and imply no position with regard to the nature of the test results, i.e. pass/fail and no claims as to the
suitability of the material for its intended use. The test data and all associated project information provided shall be held in strict confidence and disclosed to other parties only with authorization by our Client. The test data submitted herein is
considered integral with this report and is not to be reproduced except in whole and only with the authorization of the Client and Geotechnics. The remaining sample materials for this project will be
retained for a minimum of 90 days as directed by the Geotechnics’ Quality Program.
We are pleased to provide these testing services. Should you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please contact our office.
Respectively submitted,
Geotechnics, Inc.

Michael P. Smith Regional Manager

We understand that you have a choice in your laboratory services
and we thank you for choosing Geotechnics.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net

ATTERBERG LIMITS
ASTM D 4318-10 / AASHTO T89-10
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC. Boring No.:SMALL STOCKPILE
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft):NA
Project No.: 2016-625-002 Sample No.: RED SANDY CLAY
Lab ID:2016-625-002-001 Soil Description:RED LEAN CLAY
Note: The USCS symbol used with this test refers only to the minus No. 40 ( Minus No. 40 sieve material, Airdried)
sieve material. See the "Sieve and Hydrometer Analysis" graph page for the complete material description .
Liquid Limit Test 1 2 3
M
Tare Number I 1M O U
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g) 29.44 27.90 28.73 L
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g) 25.19 24.20 24.33 T
Wt. of Tare (g)15.22 15.82 15.22 I
Wt. of Water (g)4.3 3.7 4.4 P
Wt. of Dry Sample (g)10.0 8.4 9.1 O
I
Moisture Content (%)42.6 44.2 48.3 N
Number of Blows 33 27 15 T
Plastic Limit Test 1 2 Range Test Results
Tare Number A-B 4M Liquid Limit (%) 45
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g) 22.50 24.38
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g) 21.16 22.68 Plastic Limit (%) 24
Wt. of Tare (g) 15.50 15.59
Wt. of Water (g) 1.3 1.7 Plasticity Index (%) 21
Wt. of Dry Sample (g) 5.7 7.1
USCS Symbol CL
Moisture Content (%) 23.7 24.0 -0.3
Note: The acceptable range of the two Moisture contents is ± 2.6
Flow Curve Plasticity Chart
Tested By NE Date 2/10/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/11/16
page 1 of 1 DCN:CT-S4B DATE:3/18/13 REVISION:4 3ptlimit.xls
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
110100
Wa
t
e
r

C
o
n
t
e
n
t

(
%
)
Number of Blows
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 20406080100
Pl
a
s
t
i
c
i
t
y

I
n
d
e
x

(
%
)
Liquid Limit (%)
CL CH
MH
CL-ML
ML
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC. Boring No. SMALL STOCKPILE
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No. 2016-625-002 Sample No. RED SANDY CLAY
Lab ID 2016-625-002-001 Soil Color RED
SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER
USCS cobbles gravel sand silt and clay fraction
USDA cobbles gravel sand silt clay
USCS Summary
Sieve Sizes (mm) Percentage
Greater Than #4 Gravel 13.95
#4 To #200 Sand 47.90
Finer Than #200 Silt & Clay 38.15
USCS Symbol SC, TESTED
USCS Classification CLAYEY SAND
page 1 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-002-001 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.0010.010.11101001000
Pe
r
c
e
n
t

F
i
n
e
r

B
y

W
e
i
g
h
t
Particle Diameter (mm)
12" 6" 3" 2" 1" 3/4" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #140 #200
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
USDA CLASSIFICATION CHART
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. SMALL STOCKPILE
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No.2016-625-002 Sample No. RED SANDY CLAY
Lab ID 2016-625-002-001 Soil Color RED
Particle Percent USDA SUMMARY Actual Corrected % of Minus 2.0 mm
Size (mm)Finer Percentage material for USDA Classificat.
Gravel 16.63 0.00
2 83.37 Sand 48.78 58.51
0.05 34.59 Silt 19.06 22.86
0.002 15.53 Clay 15.53 18.63
USDA Classification: SANDY LOAM
page 2 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-002-001 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
0102030405060708090100
PERCENT SAND
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10 90
8
7
6
5
4
3
20
10
CLAY
SANDY CLAY
SANDY CLAY LOAM
SANDY LOAM
SAND
LOAM
SILT LOAM
SILT
CLAY LOAM SILTY CLAY LOAM
SILTY CLAY
LOAMY
SAND
PERCENT SILT
PERCENT CLAY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
WASH SIEVE ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. SMALL STOCKPILE
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No.2016-625-002 Sample No. RED SANDY CLAY
Lab ID 2016-625-002-001 Soil Color RED
Minus #10 for Hygroscopic Moisture Content Hydrometer Specimen Data
Tare No.N-1 Air Dried - #10 Hydrometer Material (g)50.00
Wgt.Tare + Wet Soil (g)29.41 Corrected Dry Wt. of - #10 Material (g)44.97
Wgt.Tare + Dry Soil (g)28.04
Weight of Tare (g)15.80 Weight of - #200 Material (g)20.58
Weight of Water (g)1.37 Weight of - #10 ; + #200 Material (g)24.39
Weight of Dry Soil (g)12.24
Moisture Content (%)11.2 J-FACTOR (%FINER THAN #10)0.8337
Soil Specimen Data
Tare No.319
Wgt.Tare + Air Dry Soil (g)2004.98
Weight of Tare (g)209.12
Air Dried Wgt. Total Sample (g) 1795.86 Dry Weight of Material Retained on #10 (g) 273.16Total Dry Sample Weight (g) 1642.58 Corrected Dry Sample Wt - #10 (g)1369.42
Sieve Sieve Wgt.of Soil Percent Accumulated Percent Accumulated
Size Opening Retained Retained Percent Finer Percent
(mm)Retained Finer
(gm)(%) (%)(%)(%)
12" 300 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
6" 150 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
3" 75 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
2" 50 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1 1/2" 37.5 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1" 25.0 128.82 7.8 7.8 92.2 92.2
3/4" 19.0 20.36 1.2 9.1 90.9 90.9
1/2" 12.5 27.88 1.7 10.8 89.2 89.2
3/8" 9.50 13.57 0.8 11.6 88.4 88.4
#4 4.75 38.51 2.3 13.9 86.1 86.1
#10 2.00 44.02 2.7 16.6 83.4 83.4
#20 0.85 2.36 5.2 5.2 94.8 79.0
#40 0.425 6.28 14.0 19.2 80.8 67.4
#60 0.250 5.86 13.0 32.2 67.8 56.5
#140 0.106 8.17 18.2 50.4 49.6 41.3
#200 0.075 1.72 3.8 54.2 45.8 38.2
Pan -20.58 45.8 100.0 --
Notes :
Tested By BW Date 2/11/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/11/16
page 3 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-002-001 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. SMALL STOCKPILE
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No.2016-625-002 Sample No. RED SANDY CLAY
Lab ID 2016-625-002-001 Soil Color RED
Elapsed R Temp.Composite RNKDiameterN'
Time Measured ( o C )Correction Corrected ( % ) Factor ( mm ) ( % )
(min)
0NANANANANANANANA
2 21.0 21.7 4.66 16.3 38.4 0.01467 0.0372 32.0
5 19.0 21.7 4.66 14.3 33.7 0.01467 0.0238 28.1
15 18.0 21.7 4.66 13.3 31.3 0.01467 0.0138 26.1
30 17.0 21.7 4.66 12.3 29.0 0.01467 0.0098 24.2
60 15.5 21.8 4.63 10.9 25.5 0.01466 0.0070 21.3
250 13.0 22 4.57 8.4 19.8 0.01462 0.0035 16.5
1440 12.5 21.1 4.85 7.7 18.0 0.01478 0.0015 15.0
Soil Specimen Data Other Corrections
Wgt. of Dry Material (g) 44.97 Hygroscopic Moisture Factor 0.899
Weight of Deflocculant (g) 5.0
a - Factor 1.056
Percent Finer than # 10 83.37
Specific Gravity 2.37 Assumed
Notes:
Tested By TB Date 2/9/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/11/16
page 4 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-002-001 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
ASTM D698-12
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No.: SMALL STOCKPILE
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft): NA
Project No.:2016-625-002 Sample No.: RED SANDY CLAY
Lab ID:2016-625-002-001 Test Method STANDARD
Visual Description: RED CLAYEY SAND
Optimum Water Content 17.6
Maximum Dry Density 107.8
Tested By AMS Date 2/8/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/9/16
page 1 of 2 DCN:CT-S12 DATE:5/1/13 REVISION: 14 PROCTOR.xls
90
95
100
105
110
115
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
De
n
s
i
t
y

(
p
c
f
)
Water Content (%)
Specific Gravity 2.70
Assumed
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
MOISTURE - DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
ASTM D698-12
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No.: SMALL STOCKPILE
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft): NA
Project No.:2016-625-002 Sample No.: RED SANDY CLAY
Lab ID:2016-625-002-001
Visual Description: RED CLAYEY SAND
Total Weight of the Sample (g) 20800 Test Type STANDARD
As Received Water Content (%)NA Rammer Weight (lb)5.5
Assumed Specific Gravity 2.70 Rammer Drop (in)12
Rammer Type MECHANICAL
Percent Retained on 3/4" 3 Machine ID R 174
Percent Retained on 3/8" 1 Mold ID R 173
Percent Retained on #4 NA Mold diameter 6"
Oversize Material Not included Weight of the Mold (g)5529
Procedure Used C Volume of the Mold (cm3)2119
Mold / Specimen
Point No.123 4 5
Wt. of Mold & Wet Sample (g)9165 9525 9829 9767 9630
Wt.of Mold (g)5529 5529 5529 5529 5529
Wt. of Wet Sample (g)3636 3996 4300 4238 4101
Mold Volume (cm3)2119 2119 2119 2119 2119
Moisture Content / Density
Tare Number 866 317 398 312 310
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g)414.80 446.20 432.90 408.20 437.30
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g)380.80 400.90 380.90 354.20 373.90
Wt. of Tare (g)86.60 83.90 84.00 84.30 111.80
Wt. of Water (g)34.00 45.30 52.00 54.00 63.40
Wt. of Dry Sample (g)294.20 317.00 296.90 269.90 262.10
Wet Density (g/cm3)1.72 1.89 2.03 2.00 1.94
Wet Density (pcf) 107.1 117.7 126.6 124.8 120.8
Moisture Content (%) 11.6 14.3 17.5 20.0 24.2
Dry Density (pcf) 96.0 102.9 107.7 104.0 97.2
Zero Air Voids
Moisture Content (%)20.0 24.0 28.0
Dry Unit Weight (pcf)109.4 102.2 95.9
Tested By AMS Date 2/8/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/9/16
page 2 of 2 DCN:CT-S12 DATE:5/1/13 REVISION: 14 PROCTOR.xls
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net

ATTERBERG LIMITS
ASTM D 4318-10 / AASHTO T89-10
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC. Boring No.:SMALL STOCKPILE
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft):NA
Project No.: 2016-625-002 Sample No.: LT. BROWN SILT SAND
Lab ID:2016-625-002-002 Soil Description:LIGHT BROWN LEAN CLAY
Note: The USCS symbol used with this test refers only to the minus No. 40 ( Minus No. 40 sieve material, Airdried)
sieve material. See the "Sieve and Hydrometer Analysis" graph page for the complete material description .
Liquid Limit Test 1 2 3
M
Tare Number M A-N W-5 U
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g) 30.18 29.68 36.35 L
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g) 26.01 25.47 29.94 T
Wt. of Tare (g)15.15 15.44 15.61 I
Wt. of Water (g)4.2 4.2 6.4 P
Wt. of Dry Sample (g)10.9 10.0 14.3 O
I
Moisture Content (%)38.4 42.0 44.7 N
Number of Blows 34 24 16 T
Plastic Limit Test 1 2 Range Test Results
Tare Number Y-3 D-1 Liquid Limit (%) 41
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g) 25.61 25.85
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g) 23.85 24.06 Plastic Limit (%) 21
Wt. of Tare (g) 15.64 15.29
Wt. of Water (g) 1.8 1.8 Plasticity Index (%) 20
Wt. of Dry Sample (g) 8.2 8.8
USCS Symbol CL
Moisture Content (%) 21.4 20.4 1.0
Note: The acceptable range of the two Moisture contents is ± 2.6
Flow Curve Plasticity Chart
Tested By TB Date 2/9/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/10/16
page 1 of 1 DCN:CT-S4B DATE:3/18/13 REVISION:4 3ptlimit.xls
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
110100
Wa
t
e
r

C
o
n
t
e
n
t

(
%
)
Number of Blows
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 20406080100
Pl
a
s
t
i
c
i
t
y

I
n
d
e
x

(
%
)
Liquid Limit (%)
CL CH
MH
CL-ML
ML
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC. Boring No. SMALL STOCKPILE
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No. 2016-625-002 Sample No. LT. BROWN SILT SAND
Lab ID 2016-625-002-002 Soil Color LIGHT BROWN
SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER
USCS cobbles gravel sand silt and clay fraction
USDA cobbles gravel sand silt clay
USCS Summary
Sieve Sizes (mm) Percentage
Greater Than #4 Gravel 2.52
#4 To #200 Sand 60.91
Finer Than #200 Silt & Clay 36.58
USCS Symbol SC, TESTED
USCS Classification CLAYEY SAND
page 1 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-002-002 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.0010.010.11101001000
Pe
r
c
e
n
t

F
i
n
e
r

B
y

W
e
i
g
h
t
Particle Diameter (mm)
12" 6" 3" 2" 1" 3/4" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #140 #200
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
USDA CLASSIFICATION CHART
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. SMALL STOCKPILE
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No.2016-625-002 Sample No. LT. BROWN SILT SAND
Lab ID 2016-625-002-002 Soil Color LIGHT BROWN
Particle Percent USDA SUMMARY Actual Corrected % of Minus 2.0 mm
Size (mm)Finer Percentage material for USDA Classificat.
Gravel 5.70 0.00
2 94.30 Sand 60.44 64.10
0.05 33.85 Silt 13.22 14.02
0.002 20.63 Clay 20.63 21.88
USDA Classification: SANDY CLAY LOAM
page 2 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-002-002 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
0102030405060708090100
PERCENT SAND
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10 90
8
7
6
5
4
3
20
10
CLAY
SANDY CLAY
SANDY CLAY LOAM
SANDY LOAM
SAND
LOAM
SILT LOAM
SILT
CLAY LOAM SILTY CLAY LOAM
SILTY CLAY
LOAMY
SAND
PERCENT SILT
PERCENT CLAY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
WASH SIEVE ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. SMALL STOCKPILE
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No.2016-625-002 Sample No. LT. BROWN SILT SAND
Lab ID 2016-625-002-002 Soil Color LIGHT BROWN
Minus #10 for Hygroscopic Moisture Content Hydrometer Specimen Data
Tare No.R-1 Air Dried - #10 Hydrometer Material (g)50.00
Wgt.Tare + Wet Soil (g)35.90 Corrected Dry Wt. of - #10 Material (g)47.87
Wgt.Tare + Dry Soil (g)35.32
Weight of Tare (g)22.31 Weight of - #200 Material (g)18.57
Weight of Water (g)0.58 Weight of - #10 ; + #200 Material (g)29.30
Weight of Dry Soil (g)13.01
Moisture Content (%)4.5 J-FACTOR (%FINER THAN #10)0.9430
Soil Specimen Data
Tare No.AF-09
Wgt.Tare + Air Dry Soil (g) 758.24
Weight of Tare (g) 228.01
Air Dried Wgt. Total Sample (g) 530.23 Dry Weight of Material Retained on #10 (g) 29.02Total Dry Sample Weight (g) 508.84 Corrected Dry Sample Wt - #10 (g) 479.82
Sieve Sieve Wgt.of Soil Percent Accumulated Percent Accumulated
Size Opening Retained Retained Percent Finer Percent
(mm)Retained Finer
(gm)(%) (%)(%)(%)
12" 300 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
6" 150 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
3" 75 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
2" 50 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1 1/2" 37.5 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1" 25.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
3/4" 19.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1/2" 12.5 3.68 0.7 0.7 99.3 99.3
3/8" 9.50 2.88 0.6 1.3 98.7 98.7
#4 4.75 6.24 1.2 2.5 97.5 97.5
#10 2.00 16.22 3.2 5.7 94.3 94.3
#20 0.85 2.71 5.7 5.7 94.3 89.0
#40 0.425 9.36 19.6 25.2 74.8 70.5
#60 0.250 7.30 15.3 40.5 59.5 56.1
#140 0.106 8.13 17.0 57.5 42.5 40.1
#200 0.075 1.80 3.8 61.2 38.8 36.6
Pan -18.57 38.8 100.0 --
Notes :
Tested By BW Date 2/11/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/11/16
page 3 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-002-002 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. SMALL STOCKPILE
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No.2016-625-002 Sample No. LT. BROWN SILT SAND
Lab ID 2016-625-002-002 Soil Color LIGHT BROWN
Elapsed R Temp.Composite RNKDiameterN'
Time Measured ( o C )Correction Corrected ( % ) Factor ( mm ) ( % )
(min)
0NANANANANANANANA
2 20.0 21.7 4.66 15.3 33.8 0.01467 0.0374 31.9
5 18.0 21.8 4.63 13.4 29.5 0.01466 0.0239 27.8
15 17.0 21.8 4.63 12.4 27.3 0.01466 0.0139 25.7
30 16.5 21.8 4.63 11.9 26.2 0.01466 0.0099 24.7
60 16.0 21.8 4.63 11.4 25.1 0.01466 0.0070 23.7
250 15.0 21.8 4.63 10.4 22.9 0.01466 0.0034 21.6
1440 14.5 21.1 4.85 9.7 21.3 0.01478 0.0015 20.1
Soil Specimen Data Other Corrections
Wgt. of Dry Material (g) 47.87 Hygroscopic Moisture Factor 0.957
Weight of Deflocculant (g) 5.0
a - Factor 1.056
Percent Finer than # 10 94.30
Specific Gravity 2.37 Assumed
Notes:
Tested By TB Date 2/9/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/11/16
page 4 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-002-002 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
ASTM D698-12
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No.: SMALL STOCKPILE
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft): NA
Project No.:2016-625-002 Sample No.: LT BROWN SILT SAND
Lab ID:2016-625-002-002 Test Method STANDARD
Visual Description: LIGHT BROWN CLAYEY SAND
Optimum Water Content 15.5
Maximum Dry Density 110.2
Tested By BW Date 2/8/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/10/16
page 1 of 2 DCN:CT-S12 DATE:5/1/13 REVISION: 14 PROCTOR.xls
90
95
100
105
110
115
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
De
n
s
i
t
y

(
p
c
f
)
Water Content (%)
Specific Gravity 2.70
Assumed
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
MOISTURE - DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
ASTM D698-12
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No.: SMALL STOCKPILE
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft): NA
Project No.:2016-625-002 Sample No.: LT BROWN SILT SAND
Lab ID:2016-625-002-002
Visual Description: LIGHT BROWN CLAYEY SAND
Total Weight of the Sample (g) 18300 Test Type STANDARD
As Received Water Content (%)NA Rammer Weight (lb)5.5
Assumed Specific Gravity 2.70 Rammer Drop (in)12
Rammer Type MECHANICAL
Percent Retained on 3/4" 2 Machine ID R 174
Percent Retained on 3/8" 1 Mold ID R 173
Percent Retained on #4 NA Mold diameter 6"
Oversize Material Not included Weight of the Mold (g)5529
Procedure Used C Volume of the Mold (cm3)2119
Mold / Specimen
Point No.123 4 5
Wt. of Mold & Wet Sample (g)9115 9478 9833 9836 9724
Wt.of Mold (g)5529 5529 5529 5529 5529
Wt. of Wet Sample (g)3586 3949 4304 4307 4195
Mold Volume (cm3)2119 2119 2119 2119 2119
Moisture Content / Density
Tare Number 866 300 398 368 305
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g)507.40 622.20 562.80 681.90 626.80
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g)473.20 567.10 500.00 594.50 531.90
Wt. of Tare (g)86.50 111.20 84.10 111.60 84.80
Wt. of Water (g)34.20 55.10 62.80 87.40 94.90
Wt. of Dry Sample (g)386.70 455.90 415.90 482.90 447.10
Wet Density (g/cm3)1.69 1.86 2.03 2.03 1.98
Wet Density (pcf) 105.6 116.3 126.7 126.8 123.5
Moisture Content (%) 8.8 12.1 15.1 18.1 21.2
Dry Density (pcf) 97.0 103.7 110.1 107.4 101.9
Zero Air Voids
Moisture Content (%)19.0 24.0 28.0
Dry Unit Weight (pcf)111.4 102.2 95.9
Tested By BW Date 2/8/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/10/16
page 2 of 2 DCN:CT-S12 DATE:5/1/13 REVISION: 14 PROCTOR.xls
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net

MOISTURE CONTENT
ASTM D 2216-10
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC.
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF
Project No.: 2016-625-003
Lab ID:001
Boring No.:NA
Depth (ft):SUBSURFACE
Sample No.:POND DAM
Tare Number 807
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g) 246.07
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g) 224.07
Weight of Tare (g)103.06
Weight of Water (g)22.00
Weight of Dry Sample (g)121.01
Water Content (%)18.2
Notes :
Tested By AMS Date 2/17/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/18/16
page 1 of 1 DCN: CT-S1 DATE: 3/18/13 REVISION: 4
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net

ATTERBERG LIMITS
ASTM D 4318-10 / AASHTO T89-10
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC. Boring No.:NA
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft):SUBSURFACE
Project No.: 2016-625-003 Sample No.: POND DAM
Lab ID:2016-625-003-001 Soil Description:ORANGE SILT
Note: The USCS symbol used with this test refers only to the minus No. 40 ( Minus No. 40 sieve material, Airdried)
sieve material. See the "Sieve and Hydrometer Analysis" graph page for the complete material description .
Liquid Limit Test 1 2 3
M
Tare Number I 4M 1M U
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g) 28.63 29.44 27.77 L
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g) 24.38 24.89 23.68 T
Wt. of Tare (g)15.22 15.59 15.82 I
Wt. of Water (g)4.3 4.6 4.1 P
Wt. of Dry Sample (g)9.2 9.3 7.9 O
I
Moisture Content (%)46.4 48.9 52.0 N
Number of Blows 34 24 14 T
Plastic Limit Test 1 2 Range Test Results
Tare Number A-B O Liquid Limit (%) 48
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g) 22.90 22.95
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g) 20.82 20.75 Plastic Limit (%) 39
Wt. of Tare (g) 15.50 15.22
Wt. of Water (g) 2.1 2.2 Plasticity Index (%) 9
Wt. of Dry Sample (g) 5.3 5.5
USCS Symbol ML
Moisture Content (%) 39.1 39.8 -0.7
Note: The acceptable range of the two Moisture contents is ± 2.6
Flow Curve Plasticity Chart
Tested By TB Date 2/15/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/17/16
page 1 of 1 DCN:CT-S4B DATE:3/18/13 REVISION:4 3ptlimit.xls
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
110100
Wa
t
e
r

C
o
n
t
e
n
t

(
%
)
Number of Blows
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 20406080100
Pl
a
s
t
i
c
i
t
y

I
n
d
e
x

(
%
)
Liquid Limit (%)
CL CH
MH
CL-ML
ML
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC. Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) SUBSURFACE
Project No. 2016-625-003 Sample No. POND DAM
Lab ID 2016-625-003-001 Soil Color ORANGE
SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER
USCS cobbles gravel sand silt and clay fraction
USDA cobbles gravel sand silt clay
USCS Summary
Sieve Sizes (mm) Percentage
Greater Than #4 Gravel 0.03
#4 To #200 Sand 63.71
Finer Than #200 Silt & Clay 36.26
USCS Symbol SM, TESTED
USCS Classification SILTY SAND
page 1 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-003-001 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.0010.010.11101001000
Pe
r
c
e
n
t

F
i
n
e
r

B
y

W
e
i
g
h
t
Particle Diameter (mm)
12" 6" 3" 2" 1" 3/4" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #140 #200
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
USDA CLASSIFICATION CHART
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) SUBSURFACE
Project No.2016-625-003 Sample No. POND DAM
Lab ID 2016-625-003-001 Soil Color ORANGE
Particle Percent USDA SUMMARY Actual Corrected % of Minus 2.0 mm
Size (mm)Finer Percentage material for USDA Classificat.
Gravel 2.45 0.00
2 97.55 Sand 63.22 64.81
0.05 34.33 Silt 20.95 21.48
0.002 13.38 Clay 13.38 13.71
USDA Classification: SANDY LOAM
page 2 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-003-001 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
0102030405060708090100
PERCENT SAND
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10 90
8
7
6
5
4
3
20
10
CLAY
SANDY CLAY
SANDY CLAY LOAM
SANDY LOAM
SAND
LOAM
SILT LOAM
SILT
CLAY LOAM SILTY CLAY LOAM
SILTY CLAY
LOAMY
SAND
PERCENT SILT
PERCENT CLAY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
WASH SIEVE ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) SUBSURFACE
Project No.2016-625-003 Sample No. POND DAM
Lab ID 2016-625-003-001 Soil Color ORANGE
Minus #10 for Hygroscopic Moisture Content Hydrometer Specimen Data
Tare No.E-2 Air Dried - #10 Hydrometer Material (g)50.00
Wgt.Tare + Wet Soil (g)38.64 Corrected Dry Wt. of - #10 Material (g)44.26
Wgt.Tare + Dry Soil (g)36.79
Weight of Tare (g)22.52 Weight of - #200 Material (g)16.45
Weight of Water (g)1.85 Weight of - #10 ; + #200 Material (g)27.81
Weight of Dry Soil (g)14.27
Moisture Content (%)13.0 J-FACTOR (%FINER THAN #10)0.9755
Soil Specimen Data
Tare No.AF-05
Wgt.Tare + Air Dry Soil (g) 809.33
Weight of Tare (g) 227.97
Air Dried Wgt. Total Sample (g) 581.36 Dry Weight of Material Retained on #10 (g) 12.65Total Dry Sample Weight (g) 516.09 Corrected Dry Sample Wt - #10 (g) 503.44
Sieve Sieve Wgt.of Soil Percent Accumulated Percent Accumulated
Size Opening Retained Retained Percent Finer Percent
(mm)Retained Finer
(gm)(%) (%)(%)(%)
12" 300 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
6" 150 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
3" 75 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
2" 50 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1 1/2" 37.5 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1" 25.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
3/4" 19.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1/2" 12.5 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
3/8" 9.50 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
#4 4.75 0.16 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
#10 2.00 12.49 2.4 2.5 97.5 97.5
#20 0.85 2.13 4.8 4.8 95.2 92.9
#40 0.425 7.90 17.8 22.7 77.3 75.4
#60 0.250 6.55 14.8 37.5 62.5 61.0
#140 0.106 8.67 19.6 57.0 43.0 41.9
#200 0.075 2.56 5.8 62.8 37.2 36.3
Pan -16.45 37.2 100.0 --
Notes :
Tested By EL Date 2/17/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/19/16
page 3 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-003-001 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) SUBSURFACE
Project No.2016-625-003 Sample No. POND DAM
Lab ID 2016-625-003-001 Soil Color ORANGE
Elapsed R Temp.Composite RNKDiameterN'
Time Measured ( o C )Correction Corrected ( % ) Factor ( mm ) ( % )
(min)
0NANANANANANANANA
2 19.0 21.2 4.82 14.2 33.8 0.01476 0.0379 33.0
5 16.0 21.3 4.78 11.2 26.8 0.01474 0.0244 26.1
15 15.0 21.3 4.78 10.2 24.4 0.01474 0.0142 23.8
30 14.0 21.3 4.78 9.2 22.0 0.01474 0.0101 21.4
60 12.5 21.3 4.78 7.7 18.4 0.01474 0.0072 18.0
250 11.0 21.7 4.66 6.3 15.1 0.01467 0.0035 14.8
1440 10.0 22 4.57 5.4 13.0 0.01462 0.0015 12.6
Soil Specimen Data Other Corrections
Wgt. of Dry Material (g) 44.26 Hygroscopic Moisture Factor 0.885
Weight of Deflocculant (g) 5.0
a - Factor 1.056
Percent Finer than # 10 97.55
Specific Gravity 2.37 Assumed
Notes:
Tested By TB Date 2/12/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/19/16
page 4 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-003-001 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
ASTM D698-12
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No.: NA
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft): SUBSURFACE
Project No.:2016-625-003 Sample No.: POND DAM
Lab ID:2016-625-003-001 Test Method STANDARD
Visual Description: ORANGE SILTY SAND
Optimum Water Content 15.8
Maximum Dry Density 104.7
Tested By AMS Date 2/17/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/18/16
page 1 of 2 DCN:CT-S12 DATE:5/1/13 REVISION: 14 PROCTOR.xls
90
95
100
105
110
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
De
n
s
i
t
y

(
p
c
f
)
Water Content (%)
Specific Gravity 2.70
Assumed
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
MOISTURE - DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
ASTM D698-12
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No.: NA
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft): SUBSURFACE
Project No.:2016-625-003 Sample No.: POND DAM
Lab ID:2016-625-003-001
Visual Description: ORANGE SILTY SAND
Total Weight of the Sample (g) 18900 Test Type STANDARD
As Received Water Content (%)NA Rammer Weight (lb)5.5
Assumed Specific Gravity 2.70 Rammer Drop (in)12
Rammer Type MECHANICAL
Percent Retained on 3/4" NA Machine ID R 174
Percent Retained on 3/8" NA Mold ID R 461
Percent Retained on #4 NA Mold diameter 4"
Oversize Material Not included Weight of the Mold (g)4160
Procedure Used A Volume of the Mold (cm3)942
Mold / Specimen
Point No.123 4 5
Wt. of Mold & Wet Sample (g)5826 5939 5999 6014 5971
Wt.of Mold (g)4160 4160 4160 4160 4160
Wt. of Wet Sample (g)1666 1779 1839 1854 1811
Mold Volume (cm3)942 942 942 942 942
Moisture Content / Density
Tare Number 866 398 307 317 314
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g)407.60 405.20 417.00 409.90 429.10
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g)377.20 366.90 373.60 355.50 365.20
Wt. of Tare (g)86.60 84.00 109.90 84.00 84.40
Wt. of Water (g)30.40 38.30 43.40 54.40 63.90
Wt. of Dry Sample (g)290.60 282.90 263.70 271.50 280.80
Wet Density (g/cm3)1.77 1.89 1.95 1.97 1.92
Wet Density (pcf) 110.4 117.8 121.8 122.9 120.0
Moisture Content (%) 10.5 13.5 16.5 20.0 22.8
Dry Density (pcf) 99.9 103.8 104.6 102.3 97.7
Zero Air Voids
Moisture Content (%)22.0 24.0 27.0
Dry Unit Weight (pcf)105.7 102.2 97.4
Tested By AMS Date 2/17/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/18/16
page 2 of 2 DCN:CT-S12 DATE:5/1/13 REVISION: 14 PROCTOR.xls
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net

ATTERBERG LIMITS
ASTM D 4318-10 / AASHTO T89-10
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC. Boring No.:NA
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft):SUBSURFACE
Project No.: 2016-625-004 Sample No.: POND DAM #2
Lab ID:2016-625-004-001 Soil Description:ORANGE LEAN CLAY
Note: The USCS symbol used with this test refers only to the minus No. 40 ( Minus No. 40 sieve material, Airdried)
sieve material. See the "Sieve and Hydrometer Analysis" graph page for the complete material description .
Liquid Limit Test 1 2 3
M
Tare Number R V-2 B4 U
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g) 28.69 32.21 32.01 L
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g) 24.93 27.24 26.83 T
Wt. of Tare (g)15.16 15.62 15.46 I
Wt. of Water (g)3.8 5.0 5.2 P
Wt. of Dry Sample (g)9.8 11.6 11.4 O
I
Moisture Content (%)38.5 42.8 45.6 N
Number of Blows 35 25 15 T
Plastic Limit Test 1 2 Range Test Results
Tare Number Z-4 A-K Liquid Limit (%) 42
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g) 25.33 24.63
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g) 23.64 23.14 Plastic Limit (%) 20
Wt. of Tare (g) 15.59 15.55
Wt. of Water (g) 1.7 1.5 Plasticity Index (%) 22
Wt. of Dry Sample (g) 8.1 7.6
USCS Symbol CL
Moisture Content (%) 21.0 19.6 1.4
Note: The acceptable range of the two Moisture contents is ± 2.6
Flow Curve Plasticity Chart
Tested By TB Date 2/18/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/19/16
page 1 of 1 DCN:CT-S4B DATE:3/18/13 REVISION:4 3ptlimit.xls
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
110100
Wa
t
e
r

C
o
n
t
e
n
t

(
%
)
Number of Blows
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 20406080100
Pl
a
s
t
i
c
i
t
y

I
n
d
e
x

(
%
)
Liquid Limit (%)
CL CH
MH
CL-ML
ML
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC. Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) SUBSURFACE
Project No. 2016-625-004 Sample No. POND DAM #2
Lab ID 2016-625-004-001 Soil Color ORANGE
SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER
USCS cobbles gravel sand silt and clay fraction
USDA cobbles gravel sand silt clay
USCS Summary
Sieve Sizes (mm) Percentage
Greater Than #4 Gravel 0.62
#4 To #200 Sand 55.88
Finer Than #200 Silt & Clay 43.50
USCS Symbol SC, TESTED
USCS Classification CLAYEY SAND
page 1 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-004-001 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.0010.010.11101001000
Pe
r
c
e
n
t

F
i
n
e
r

B
y

W
e
i
g
h
t
Particle Diameter (mm)
12" 6" 3" 2" 1" 3/4" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #140 #200
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
USDA CLASSIFICATION CHART
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) SUBSURFACE
Project No.2016-625-004 Sample No. POND DAM #2
Lab ID 2016-625-004-001 Soil Color ORANGE
Particle Percent USDA SUMMARY Actual Corrected % of Minus 2.0 mm
Size (mm)Finer Percentage material for USDA Classificat.
Gravel 1.55 0.00
2 98.45 Sand 55.14 56.01
0.05 43.31 Silt 17.18 17.45
0.002 26.13 Clay 26.13 26.54
USDA Classification: SANDY CLAY LOAM
page 2 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-004-001 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
0102030405060708090100
PERCENT SAND
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10 90
8
7
6
5
4
3
20
10
CLAY
SANDY CLAY
SANDY CLAY LOAM
SANDY LOAM
SAND
LOAM
SILT LOAM
SILT
CLAY LOAM SILTY CLAY LOAM
SILTY CLAY
LOAMY
SAND
PERCENT SILT
PERCENT CLAY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
WASH SIEVE ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No.NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) SUBSURFACE
Project No.2016-625-004 Sample No. POND DAM #2
Lab ID 2016-625-004-001 Soil Color ORANGE
Minus #10 for Hygroscopic Moisture Content Hydrometer Specimen Data
Tare No.B-2 Air Dried - #10 Hydrometer Material (g)50.00
Wgt.Tare + Wet Soil (g)33.48 Corrected Dry Wt. of - #10 Material (g)45.29
Wgt.Tare + Dry Soil (g)32.41
Weight of Tare (g)22.12 Weight of - #200 Material (g)20.01
Weight of Water (g)1.07 Weight of - #10 ; + #200 Material (g)25.28
Weight of Dry Soil (g)10.29
Moisture Content (%)10.4 J-FACTOR (%FINER THAN #10)0.9845
Soil Specimen Data
Tare No.NE-06
Wgt.Tare + Air Dry Soil (g)816.43
Weight of Tare (g)227.18
Air Dried Wgt. Total Sample (g) 589.25 Dry Weight of Material Retained on #10 (g) 8.26Total Dry Sample Weight (g) 534.53 Corrected Dry Sample Wt - #10 (g)526.27
Sieve Sieve Wgt.of Soil Percent Accumulated Percent Accumulated
Size Opening Retained Retained Percent Finer Percent
(mm)Retained Finer
(gm)(%) (%)(%)(%)
12" 300 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
6" 150 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
3" 75 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
2" 50 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1 1/2" 37.5 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1" 25.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
3/4" 19.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1/2" 12.5 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
3/8" 9.50 3.11 0.6 0.6 99.4 99.4
#4 4.75 0.18 0.0 0.6 99.4 99.4
#10 2.00 4.97 0.9 1.5 98.5 98.5
#20 0.85 3.06 6.8 6.8 93.2 91.8
#40 0.425 9.31 20.6 27.3 72.7 71.6
#60 0.250 5.90 13.0 40.3 59.7 58.7
#140 0.106 5.67 12.5 52.9 47.1 46.4
#200 0.075 1.34 3.0 55.8 44.2 43.5
Pan -20.01 44.2 100.0 --
Notes :
Tested By EL Date 2/23/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/25/16
page 3 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-004-001 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) SUBSURFACE
Project No.2016-625-004 Sample No. POND DAM #2
Lab ID 2016-625-004-001 Soil Color ORANGE
Elapsed R Temp.Composite RNKDiameterN'
Time Measured ( o C )Correction Corrected ( % ) Factor ( mm ) ( % )
(min)
0NANANANANANANANA
2 23.0 23.2 4.20 18.8 43.8 0.01442 0.0361 43.2
5 22.0 23.3 4.17 17.8 41.6 0.01440 0.0229 40.9
15 21.0 23.4 4.14 16.9 39.3 0.01438 0.0133 38.7
30 20.0 23.4 4.14 15.9 37.0 0.01438 0.0095 36.4
60 18.5 23.4 4.14 14.4 33.5 0.01438 0.0068 33.0
250 16.5 23.3 4.17 12.3 28.8 0.01440 0.0034 28.3
1440 15.5 21.5 4.72 10.8 25.1 0.01471 0.0014 24.7
Soil Specimen Data Other Corrections
Wgt. of Dry Material (g) 45.29 Hygroscopic Moisture Factor 0.906
Weight of Deflocculant (g) 5.0
a - Factor 1.056
Percent Finer than # 10 98.45
Specific Gravity 2.37 Assumed
Notes:
Tested By TB Date 2/23/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/25/16
page 4 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-004-001 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
ASTM D698-12
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No.: NA
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft): SUBSURFACE
Project No.:2016-625-004 Sample No.: POND DAM #2
Lab ID:2016-625-004-001 Test Method STANDARD
Visual Description: ORANGE CLAYEY SAND
Optimum Water Content 15.3
Maximum Dry Density 112.6
Tested By BW/TB Date 2/18/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/25/16
page 1 of 2 DCN:CT-S12 DATE:5/1/13 REVISION: 14 PROCTOR.xls
90
95
100
105
110
115
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
De
n
s
i
t
y

(
p
c
f
)
Water Content (%)
Specific Gravity 2.70
Assumed
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
MOISTURE - DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
ASTM D698-12
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No.: NA
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft): SUBSURFACE
Project No.:2016-625-004 Sample No.: POND DAM #2
Lab ID:2016-625-004-001
Visual Description: ORANGE CLAYEY SAND
Total Weight of the Sample (g) 16100 Test Type STANDARD
As Received Water Content (%)NA Rammer Weight (lb)5.5
Assumed Specific Gravity 2.70 Rammer Drop (in)12
Rammer Type MECHANICAL
Percent Retained on 3/4" NA Machine ID R 174
Percent Retained on 3/8" NA Mold ID R 461
Percent Retained on #4 NA Mold diameter 4"
Oversize Material Not included Weight of the Mold (g)4160
Procedure Used A Volume of the Mold (cm3)942
Mold / Specimen
Point No.123 4 5
Wt. of Mold & Wet Sample (g)5769 5944 6115 6073 6003
Wt.of Mold (g)4160 4160 4160 4160 4160
Wt. of Wet Sample (g)1609 1784 1955 1913 1843
Mold Volume (cm3)942 942 942 942 942
Moisture Content / Density
Tare Number 311 842 840 837 318
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g)454.80 647.90 573.40 663.30 448.60
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g)423.60 605.80 532.74 601.49 384.17
Wt. of Tare (g)84.20 256.30 263.40 261.90 86.60
Wt. of Water (g)31.20 42.10 40.66 61.81 64.43
Wt. of Dry Sample (g)339.40 349.50 269.34 339.59 297.57
Wet Density (g/cm3)1.71 1.89 2.08 2.03 1.96
Wet Density (pcf) 106.6 118.2 129.5 126.7 122.1
Moisture Content (%) 9.2 12.0 15.1 18.2 21.7
Dry Density (pcf) 97.6 105.5 112.5 107.2 100.3
Zero Air Voids
Moisture Content (%)18.0 22.0 26.0
Dry Unit Weight (pcf)113.4 105.7 99.0
Tested By BW/TB Date 2/18/16 Checked By GEM Date 2/25/16
page 2 of 2 DCN:CT-S12 DATE:5/1/13 REVISION: 14 PROCTOR.xls
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net

MOISTURE CONTENT
ASTM D 2216-10
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC.
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF
Project No.: 2016-625-005
Lab ID:001 002
Boring No.:NA NA
Depth (ft):NA NA
Sample No.:BS-3 BS-4
Tare Number 821 TB-04
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g) 388.47 365.35
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g) 348.91 334.27
Weight of Tare (g)130.52 134.79
Weight of Water (g)39.56 31.08
Weight of Dry Sample (g)218.39 199.48
Water Content (%)18.1 15.6
Notes :
Tested By BW Date 3/16/16 Checked By GEM Date 3/17/16
page 1 of 1 DCN: CT-S1 DATE: 3/18/13 REVISION: 4
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net

ATTERBERG LIMITS
ASTM D 4318-10 / AASHTO T89-10
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC. Boring No.:NA
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft):NA
Project No.: 2016-625-005 Sample No.: BS-3
Lab ID:2016-625-005-001 Soil Description:BROWN SILT
Note: The USCS symbol used with this test refers only to the minus No. 40 ( Minus No. 40 sieve material, Airdried)
sieve material. See the "Sieve and Hydrometer Analysis" graph page for the complete material description .
Liquid Limit Test 1 2 3
M
Tare Number KP AP Y U
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g) 34.14 30.41 28.30 L
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g) 29.52 26.47 24.85 T
Wt. of Tare (g)15.55 15.57 15.63 I
Wt. of Water (g)4.6 3.9 3.5 P
Wt. of Dry Sample (g)14.0 10.9 9.2 O
I
Moisture Content (%)33.1 36.1 37.4 N
Number of Blows 35 24 16 T
Plastic Limit Test 1 2 Range Test Results
Tare Number A-M U Liquid Limit (%) 35
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g) 27.09 26.23
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g) 24.77 24.01 Plastic Limit (%) 25
Wt. of Tare (g) 15.40 15.19
Wt. of Water (g) 2.3 2.2 Plasticity Index (%) 10
Wt. of Dry Sample (g) 9.4 8.8
USCS Symbol ML
Moisture Content (%) 24.8 25.2 -0.4
Note: The acceptable range of the two Moisture contents is ± 2.6
Flow Curve Plasticity Chart
Tested By TB Date 3/11/16 Checked By GEM Date 3/14/16
page 1 of 1 DCN:CT-S4B DATE:3/18/13 REVISION:4 3ptlimit.xls
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
110100
Wa
t
e
r

C
o
n
t
e
n
t

(
%
)
Number of Blows
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 20406080100
Pl
a
s
t
i
c
i
t
y

I
n
d
e
x

(
%
)
Liquid Limit (%)
CL CH
MH
CL-ML
ML
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC. Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No. 2016-625-005 Sample No. BS-3
Lab ID 2016-625-005-001 Soil Color BROWN
SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER
USCS cobbles gravel sand silt and clay fraction
USDA cobbles gravel sand silt clay
USCS Summary
Sieve Sizes (mm) Percentage
Greater Than #4 Gravel 0.97
#4 To #200 Sand 53.54
Finer Than #200 Silt & Clay 45.49
USCS Symbol SM, TESTED
USCS Classification SILTY SAND
page 1 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-005-001 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.0010.010.11101001000
Pe
r
c
e
n
t

F
i
n
e
r

B
y

W
e
i
g
h
t
Particle Diameter (mm)
12" 6" 3" 2" 1" 3/4" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #140 #200
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
USDA CLASSIFICATION CHART
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No.2016-625-005 Sample No. BS-3
Lab ID 2016-625-005-001 Soil Color BROWN
Particle Percent USDA SUMMARY Actual Corrected % of Minus 2.0 mm
Size (mm)Finer Percentage material for USDA Classificat.
Gravel 2.35 0.00
2 97.65 Sand 56.61 57.98
0.05 41.04 Silt 22.08 22.61
0.002 18.96 Clay 18.96 19.42
USDA Classification: SANDY LOAM
page 2 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-005-001 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
0102030405060708090100
PERCENT SAND
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10 90
8
7
6
5
4
3
20
10
CLAY
SANDY CLAY
SANDY CLAY LOAM
SANDY LOAM
SAND
LOAM
SILT LOAM
SILT
CLAY LOAM SILTY CLAY LOAM
SILTY CLAY
LOAMY
SAND
PERCENT SILT
PERCENT CLAY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
WASH SIEVE ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No.2016-625-005 Sample No. BS-3
Lab ID 2016-625-005-001 Soil Color BROWN
Minus #10 for Hygroscopic Moisture Content Hydrometer Specimen Data
Tare No.N-1 Air Dried - #10 Hydrometer Material (g)50.00
Wgt.Tare + Wet Soil (g)35.14 Corrected Dry Wt. of - #10 Material (g)45.01
Wgt.Tare + Dry Soil (g)33.21
Weight of Tare (g)15.81 Weight of - #200 Material (g)20.97
Weight of Water (g)1.93 Weight of - #10 ; + #200 Material (g)24.04
Weight of Dry Soil (g)17.40
Moisture Content (%)11.1 J-FACTOR (%FINER THAN #10)0.9765
Soil Specimen Data
Tare No.AF-08
Wgt.Tare + Air Dry Soil (g) 734.76
Weight of Tare (g) 228.15
Air Dried Wgt. Total Sample (g) 506.61 Dry Weight of Material Retained on #10 (g) 10.73Total Dry Sample Weight (g) 457.10 Corrected Dry Sample Wt - #10 (g) 446.37
Sieve Sieve Wgt.of Soil Percent Accumulated Percent Accumulated
Size Opening Retained Retained Percent Finer Percent
(mm)Retained Finer
(gm)(%) (%)(%)(%)
12" 300 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
6" 150 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
3" 75 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
2" 50 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1 1/2" 37.5 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1" 25.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
3/4" 19.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1/2" 12.5 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
3/8" 9.50 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
#4 4.75 4.42 1.0 1.0 99.0 99.0
#10 2.00 6.31 1.4 2.3 97.7 97.7
#20 0.85 3.01 6.7 6.7 93.3 91.1
#40 0.425 5.47 12.2 18.8 81.2 79.3
#60 0.250 4.28 9.5 28.4 71.6 70.0
#140 0.106 8.15 18.1 46.5 53.5 52.3
#200 0.075 3.13 7.0 53.4 46.6 45.5
Pan -20.97 46.6 100.0 --
Notes :
Tested By TB Date 3/16/16 Checked By GEM Date 3/16/16
page 3 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-005-001 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No.2016-625-005 Sample No. BS-3
Lab ID 2016-625-005-001 Soil Color BROWN
Elapsed R Temp.Composite RNKDiameterN'
Time Measured ( o C )Correction Corrected ( % ) Factor ( mm ) ( % )
(min)
0NANANANANANANANA
2 21.0 23.6 4.07 16.9 37.2 0.01288 0.0327 36.4
5 19.0 23.6 4.07 14.9 32.8 0.01288 0.0209 32.1
15 17.5 23.6 4.07 13.4 29.5 0.01288 0.0122 28.8
30 16.0 23.6 4.07 11.9 26.2 0.01288 0.0087 25.6
60 14.5 23.6 4.07 10.4 22.9 0.01288 0.0062 22.4
250 13.5 23.6 4.07 9.4 20.7 0.01288 0.0031 20.2
1440 12.5 22.9 4.29 8.2 18.1 0.01299 0.0013 17.6
Soil Specimen Data Other Corrections
Wgt. of Dry Material (g) 45.01 Hygroscopic Moisture Factor 0.900
Weight of Deflocculant (g) 5.0
a - Factor 0.99
Percent Finer than # 10 97.65
Specific Gravity 2.70 Assumed
Notes:
Tested By TB Date 3/15/16 Checked By GEM Date 3/16/16
page 4 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-005-001 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
ASTM D698-12
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No.: NA
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft): NA
Project No.:2016-625-005 Sample No.: BS-3
Lab ID:2016-625-005-001 Test Method STANDARD
Visual Description: BROWN SILTY SAND
Optimum Water Content 17.3
Maximum Dry Density 105.0
Tested By NE Date 3/14/16 Checked By GEM Date 3/16/16
page 1 of 2 DCN:CT-S12 DATE:5/1/13 REVISION: 14 PROCTOR.xls
90
95
100
105
110
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
De
n
s
i
t
y

(
p
c
f
)
Water Content (%)
Specific Gravity 2.70
Assumed
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
MOISTURE - DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
ASTM D698-12
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No.: NA
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft): NA
Project No.:2016-625-005 Sample No.: BS-3
Lab ID:2016-625-005-001
Visual Description: BROWN SILTY SAND
Total Weight of the Sample (g) 20700 Test Type STANDARD
As Received Water Content (%)NA Rammer Weight (lb)5.5
Assumed Specific Gravity 2.70 Rammer Drop (in)12
Rammer Type MECHANICAL
Percent Retained on 3/4" NA Machine ID R 174
Percent Retained on 3/8" 0 Mold ID R 461
Percent Retained on #4 0 Mold diameter 4"
Oversize Material Not included Weight of the Mold (g)4160
Procedure Used A Volume of the Mold (cm3)942
Mold / Specimen
Point No.123 4 5
Wt. of Mold & Wet Sample (g)5855 5973 6033 6014 5943
Wt.of Mold (g)4160 4160 4160 4160 4160
Wt. of Wet Sample (g)1695 1814 1874 1854 1784
Mold Volume (cm3)942 942 942 942 942
Moisture Content / Density
Tare Number 305 300 312 317 304
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g)481.80 422.50 505.10 470.00 552.75
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g)435.80 381.10 439.10 400.40 462.90
Wt. of Tare (g)84.80 110.60 84.30 84.00 110.50
Wt. of Water (g)46.00 41.40 66.00 69.60 89.85
Wt. of Dry Sample (g)351.00 270.50 354.80 316.40 352.40
Wet Density (g/cm3)1.80 1.93 1.99 1.97 1.89
Wet Density (pcf) 112.3 120.2 124.1 122.9 118.2
Moisture Content (%) 13.1 15.3 18.6 22.0 25.5
Dry Density (pcf) 99.3 104.2 104.7 100.7 94.2
Zero Air Voids
Moisture Content (%)22.0 26.0 29.5
Dry Unit Weight (pcf)105.7 99.0 93.8
Tested By NE Date 3/14/16 Checked By GEM Date 3/16/16
page 2 of 2 DCN:CT-S12 DATE:5/1/13 REVISION: 14 PROCTOR.xls
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
ASTM D698-12
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No.: NA
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft): NA
Project No.:2016-625-005 Sample No.: BS-4
Lab ID:2016-625-005-002 Test Method STANDARD
Visual Description: LIGHT BROWN SILTY SAND
Optimum Water Content 14.4
Maximum Dry Density 110.6
Tested By BW Date 3/16/16 Checked By GEM Date 3/17/16
page 1 of 2 DCN:CT-S12 DATE:5/1/13 REVISION: 14 PROCTOR.xls
95
100
105
110
115
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
De
n
s
i
t
y

(
p
c
f
)
Water Content (%)
Specific Gravity 2.70
Assumed
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
MOISTURE - DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
ASTM D698-12
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No.: NA
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft): NA
Project No.:2016-625-005 Sample No.: BS-4
Lab ID:2016-625-005-002
Visual Description: LIGHT BROWN SILTY SAND
Total Weight of the Sample (g) 13800 Test Type STANDARD
As Received Water Content (%)NA Rammer Weight (lb)5.5
Assumed Specific Gravity 2.70 Rammer Drop (in)12
Rammer Type MECHANICAL
Percent Retained on 3/4" NA Machine ID R 174
Percent Retained on 3/8" 0 Mold ID R 461
Percent Retained on #4 1 Mold diameter 4"
Oversize Material Not included Weight of the Mold (g)4160
Procedure Used A Volume of the Mold (cm3)942
Mold / Specimen
Point No.123 4 5
Wt. of Mold & Wet Sample (g)5884 5934 6063 6077 6018
Wt.of Mold (g)4160 4160 4160 4160 4160
Wt. of Wet Sample (g)1724 1775 1903 1918 1859
Mold Volume (cm3)942 942 942 942 942
Moisture Content / Density
Tare Number 317 305 312 300 304
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g)421.90 451.30 443.40 485.10 492.00
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g)392.80 414.90 399.10 430.50 425.40
Wt. of Tare (g)84.30 84.80 84.10 110.60 110.50
Wt. of Water (g)29.10 36.40 44.30 54.60 66.60
Wt. of Dry Sample (g)308.50 330.10 315.00 319.90 314.90
Wet Density (g/cm3)1.83 1.88 2.02 2.04 1.97
Wet Density (pcf) 114.2 117.6 126.1 127.0 123.1
Moisture Content (%) 9.4 11.0 14.1 17.1 21.1
Dry Density (pcf) 104.4 105.9 110.5 108.5 101.6
Zero Air Voids
Moisture Content (%)19.0 22.0 25.0
Dry Unit Weight (pcf)111.4 105.7 100.6
Tested By BW Date 3/16/16 Checked By GEM Date 3/17/16
page 2 of 2 DCN:CT-S12 DATE:5/1/13 REVISION: 14 PROCTOR.xls
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC. Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No. 2016-625-005 Sample No. BS-4
Lab ID 2016-625-005-002 Soil Color LIGHT BROWN
SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER
USCS cobbles gravel sand silt and clay fraction
USDA cobbles gravel sand silt clay
USCS Summary
Sieve Sizes (mm) Percentage
Greater Than #4 Gravel 0.66
#4 To #200 Sand 62.18
Finer Than #200 Silt & Clay 37.16
USCS Symbol SM, TESTED
USCS Classification SILTY SAND
page 1 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-005-002 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.0010.010.11101001000
Pe
r
c
e
n
t

F
i
n
e
r

B
y

W
e
i
g
h
t
Particle Diameter (mm)
12" 6" 3" 2" 1" 3/4" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #140 #200
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
USDA CLASSIFICATION CHART
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No.2016-625-005 Sample No. BS-4
Lab ID 2016-625-005-002 Soil Color LIGHT BROWN
Particle Percent USDA SUMMARY Actual Corrected % of Minus 2.0 mm
Size (mm)Finer Percentage material for USDA Classificat.
Gravel 3.93 0.00
2 96.07 Sand 64.41 67.05
0.05 31.66 Silt 20.43 21.26
0.002 11.23 Clay 11.23 11.69
USDA Classification: SANDY LOAM
page 2 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-005-002 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
0102030405060708090100
PERCENT SAND
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10 90
8
7
6
5
4
3
20
10
CLAY
SANDY CLAY
SANDY CLAY LOAM
SANDY LOAM
SAND
LOAM
SILT LOAM
SILT
CLAY LOAM SILTY CLAY LOAM
SILTY CLAY
LOAMY
SAND
PERCENT SILT
PERCENT CLAY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
WASH SIEVE ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No.2016-625-005 Sample No. BS-4
Lab ID 2016-625-005-002 Soil Color LIGHT BROWN
Minus #10 for Hygroscopic Moisture Content Hydrometer Specimen Data
Tare No.E-20 Air Dried - #10 Hydrometer Material (g)50.00
Wgt.Tare + Wet Soil (g)34.83 Corrected Dry Wt. of - #10 Material (g)44.88
Wgt.Tare + Dry Soil (g)33.51
Weight of Tare (g)21.94 Weight of - #200 Material (g)17.36
Weight of Water (g)1.32 Weight of - #10 ; + #200 Material (g)27.52
Weight of Dry Soil (g)11.57
Moisture Content (%)11.4 J-FACTOR (%FINER THAN #10)0.9607
Soil Specimen Data
Tare No.AF-03
Wgt.Tare + Air Dry Soil (g) 808.03
Weight of Tare (g) 229.17
Air Dried Wgt. Total Sample (g) 578.86 Dry Weight of Material Retained on #10 (g) 20.50Total Dry Sample Weight (g) 521.68 Corrected Dry Sample Wt - #10 (g) 501.18
Sieve Sieve Wgt.of Soil Percent Accumulated Percent Accumulated
Size Opening Retained Retained Percent Finer Percent
(mm)Retained Finer
(gm)(%) (%)(%)(%)
12" 300 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
6" 150 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
3" 75 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
2" 50 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1 1/2" 37.5 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1" 25.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
3/4" 19.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
1/2" 12.5 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
3/8" 9.50 0.00 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
#4 4.75 3.44 0.7 0.7 99.3 99.3
#10 2.00 17.06 3.3 3.9 96.1 96.1
#20 0.85 2.97 6.6 6.6 93.4 89.7
#40 0.425 6.93 15.4 22.1 77.9 74.9
#60 0.250 5.78 12.9 34.9 65.1 62.5
#140 0.106 8.77 19.5 54.5 45.5 43.7
#200 0.075 3.07 6.8 61.3 38.7 37.2
Pan -17.36 38.7 100.0 --
Notes :
Tested By TB Date 3/16/16 Checked By GEM Date 3/16/16
page 3 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-005-002 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
ASTM D 422-63 (2007)
Client SMITH + GARDNER, INC.Boring No. NA
Client Reference BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft) NA
Project No.2016-625-005 Sample No. BS-4
Lab ID 2016-625-005-002 Soil Color LIGHT BROWN
Elapsed R Temp.Composite RNKDiameterN'
Time Measured ( o C )Correction Corrected ( % ) Factor ( mm ) ( % )
(min)
0NANANANANANANANA
2 16.5 23.5 4.10 12.4 27.3 0.01290 0.0336 26.3
5 15.0 23.6 4.07 10.9 24.1 0.01288 0.0214 23.2
15 13.0 23.6 4.07 8.9 19.7 0.01288 0.0125 18.9
30 12.0 23.6 4.07 7.9 17.5 0.01288 0.0089 16.8
60 11.0 23.5 4.10 6.9 15.2 0.01290 0.0063 14.6
250 10.0 23.6 4.07 5.9 13.1 0.01288 0.0031 12.6
1440 9.0 22.9 4.29 4.7 10.4 0.01299 0.0013 10.0
Soil Specimen Data Other Corrections
Wgt. of Dry Material (g) 44.88 Hygroscopic Moisture Factor 0.898
Weight of Deflocculant (g) 5.0
a - Factor 0.99
Percent Finer than # 10 96.07
Specific Gravity 2.70 Assumed
Notes:
Tested By TB Date 3/15/16 Checked By GEM Date 3/16/16
page 4 of 4 DCN: CT-S3OR DATE: 7/26/13 REVISION: 8 T:\2016 PROJECTS\2016-625 SMITH + GARDNER - BROWNFIELD C&D LF\[2016-625-005-002 SIEVEHYD10.xls]Sheet1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

2200 Westinghouse Blvd., Suite 103 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.geotechnics.net

ATTERBERG LIMITS
ASTM D 4318-10 / AASHTO T89-10
Client:SMITH + GARDNER, INC. Boring No.:NA
Client Reference: BROWNFIELD C&D LF Depth (ft):NA
Project No.: 2016-625-005 Sample No.: BS-4
Lab ID:2016-625-005-002 Soil Description:LIGHT BROWN SILT
Note: The USCS symbol used with this test refers only to the minus No. 40 ( Minus No. 40 sieve material, Airdried)
sieve material. See the "Sieve and Hydrometer Analysis" graph page for the complete material description .
Liquid Limit Test 1 2 3
M
Tare Number W-5 MD-1 U
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g) 32.07 33.08 29.13 L
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g) 27.67 28.19 25.07 T
Wt. of Tare (g)15.61 15.15 15.29 I
Wt. of Water (g)4.4 4.9 4.1 P
Wt. of Dry Sample (g)12.1 13.0 9.8 O
I
Moisture Content (%)36.5 37.5 41.5 N
Number of Blows 31 25 15 T
Plastic Limit Test 1 2 Range Test Results
Tare Number A-N Y-3 Liquid Limit (%) 38
Wt. of Tare & Wet Sample (g) 23.14 24.34
Wt. of Tare & Dry Sample (g) 21.41 22.26 Plastic Limit (%) 30
Wt. of Tare (g) 15.44 15.66
Wt. of Water (g) 1.7 2.1 Plasticity Index (%) 8
Wt. of Dry Sample (g) 6.0 6.6
USCS Symbol ML
Moisture Content (%) 29.0 31.5 -2.5
Note: The acceptable range of the two Moisture contents is ± 2.6
Flow Curve Plasticity Chart
Tested By TB Date 3/11/16 Checked By GEM Date 3/14/16
page 1 of 1 DCN:CT-S4B DATE:3/18/13 REVISION:4 3ptlimit.xls
20
25
30
35
40
45
110100
Wa
t
e
r

C
o
n
t
e
n
t

(
%
)
Number of Blows
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 20406080100
Pl
a
s
t
i
c
i
t
y

I
n
d
e
x

(
%
)
Liquid Limit (%)
CL CH
MH
CL-ML
ML
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9

This page intentionally left blank.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 118F53B4-0D65-4E42-81C6-48ACF6E9F7F9