20001_North_Graham_GW_Report_20131112

P.O. Box 5884 • Winston-Salem, NC 27113-5884
Office 336.722.9999 • Fax [phone]

November 12, 2013

Mr. Ed Tam
Belleau Wood Development, LLC
415 Pisgah Church Road, #363
Greensboro, North Carolina 27455

Subject: Limited Soil and Groundwater Assessment Report
Intersection of North Graham Hopedale Road and North Church Street
Burlington, Alamance County, North Carolina
Progress Project No.: 1013130.002

Dear Mr. Tam:

Progress Environmental, Inc. (Progress) is pleased to submit this Limited Soil and Groundwater
Assessment Report for the property located in the northeast quadrant of North Graham Hopedale
Road and North Church Street in Burlington, Alamance County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The
purpose of the environmental services is to determine whether the site has been impacted by the
historic uses of the site or by potential off-site sources.
INTRODUCTION

The site is approximately 9.64 acres and consists of a paved parking lot and inactive railroad spur
that transects the site extending northwest to southeast. The Alamance County Geographic
Information System identifies the parcel as 147805. Progress previously completed a review of the
available North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) files on
the CARA Portal and is preparing a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) for the
site.

FIELD ACTIVITIES

Geophysical Survey

A geophysical survey was completed on September 27, 2013 by Geo Solutions, Ltd. to determine if
“orphaned” USTs, anomalies, or if evidence of buried debris was present beneath the site. The
geophysical survey identified two unknown anomalies on the northeastern portion of the site.
Additional structural anomalies were not identified.

Soil and Groundwater Sampling and Temporary Monitoring Well Installation Activities

On October 2, 2013, Progress installed three temporary one-inch monitoring wells (TW-1 through
TW-3, Figure 2) and advanced eight soil borings (S-1 through S-5 and TW-1 through TW-3, Figure 2).
On October 30, 2013 Progress installed six additional temporary monitoring wells (TW-4 through
TW-9, Figure 2) and collected one soil sample (TW8-5, Figure 2) at the site to determine whether soil
and/or groundwater beneath the site has been adversely affected by the historical uses or by potential
Report of Limited Soil and Groundwater Assessment
Burlington, North Carolina
Progress Project No. 1013130.002
November 12, 2013

2
off-site sources that were identified during the October 2 and 3, 2013 soil and groundwater assessment
and during the historical research for the Phase I ESA. The borings were advanced using a track-
mounted Geoprobe®, which utilized the direct push drilling method.

Prior to initiating the first boring and between each subsequent boring, the Geoprobe® drill rig and
associated downhole equipment were decontaminated with the use of a high-pressure steam
cleaner. Soil samples were collected continuously in each boring from the ground surface to the
boring termination, at approximate five-foot intervals. Each soil sample was collected by driving a
five-foot long, 2.25-inch sampling probe into the soil. The probe is lined with a disposable clear
plastic tube, which was replaced for each five-foot interval. After the probe is driven, the clear
plastic tube filled with soil is removed from the probe. The clear plastic tube is then cut open to
remove the soil for visual analysis and/or collection of a soil sample for laboratory analysis.

A representative portion of the soil samples collected from each of the Geoprobe® soil sample tubes
was transferred into a new, clean resealable bag (half full). The bag was placed in a warm location.
Approximately ten minutes after the time of collection, the bag was opened slightly and the probe of a
RAE MiniRae Lite photoionization detector (PID) was inserted into the headspace of the bag. The
meter of the PID was monitored and the reading recorded. The recorded PID responses are presented
on the boring logs included in the Appendix.

Soil samples were collected and screened from the soil borings and temporary monitoring well borings
at five foot intervals from the ground surface to a depths ranging from approximately 5 feet below land
surface (bls) to approximately 15 feet bls.

One soil sample from each soil boring and select temporary monitoring well borings was submitted
to a North Carolina certified laboratory for analysis. The soil sample selected for laboratory
analysis from each boring was selected based on the depth to groundwater as estimated during the
drilling activities. Based on historical groundwater data and the estimated depth to groundwater
observed during the drilling activities, each soil sample selected for laboratory analysis was
collected from a depth of one to five feet bls. The selected soil sample from each boring was
placed into laboratory prepared containers and then into a cooler packed with ice and delivered
under chain-of-custody to Research and Analytical Laboratories, Inc. (R&A) in Kernersville, North
Carolina. Each soil sample S1-5, S2-5, S3-5, S4-5, S5-5, TW1-5, TW2-5, and TW3-5 was
analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using EPA Method 8260, for semi-volatile
organic compounds (SVOCs) using EPA Method 8270BNA (base neutrals and acid extractables,
for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) using EPA Method 8082, and for Priority Pollutant Metals.
Soil sample TW8-5 was analyzed for gasoline and diesel range total petroleum hydrocarbons
(TPH) using EPA Method 8015/5035 and 8015/3550, respectively.

The temporary monitoring wells were advanced to a depth of approximately 20 to 25 feet bls to
facilitate the collection of groundwater samples. Saturated soils were encountered in the soil borings
at depths ranging from approximately six to 15 feet bls. Boring logs and temporary monitoring
well construction diagrams, which include a description of the soil encountered and PID screening
results, are included in the Appendix.

On October 3 and 31, 2013 static water levels were measured in the temporary monitoring wells
TW-1 through TW-3 and existing monitoring well MWC-1 using a water level meter that was
decontaminated between each well and groundwater samples were collected. Static water levels
were measured in temporary monitoring wells TW-4 through TW-9 and groundwater samples were
collected on October 31, 2013. Groundwater samples were collected from the temporary
monitoring wells and the existing monitoring well using a disposable bailer and new length of
Report of Limited Soil and Groundwater Assessment
Burlington, North Carolina
Progress Project No. 1013130.002
November 12, 2013

3
nylon string dedicated to each well. Prior to sampling, the temporary monitoring wells were purged
of approximately three well volumes.

The groundwater samples were placed into laboratory prepared containers and then into a cooler
packed with ice and delivered under chain-of-custody to R&A. The groundwater samples collected
from temporary monitoring wells TW-1 through TW-3 and existing monitoring well MWC-1 were
analyzed for VOCs using Standard Method 6200B plus isopropyl ether (IPE) and metyl tertiary
butyl ether (MTBE), for SVOCs using EPA Method 625 BNA, for PCBs using EPA Method 8082,
and for Priority Pollutant Metals. The groundwater samples collected from temporary monitoring
wells TW-4 through TW-9 were analyzed for VOCs using Standard Method 6200B plus IPE and
MTBE.

Following the collection of the soil samples, the soil borings were backfilled with bentonite chips
and the investigation generated soil cuttings. The ground surface of the soil borings was repaired
with asphalt patch, as necessary. The temporary monitoring wells will be properly abandoned, but
have not been as of the date of this report.

Determination of Groundwater Flow Direction
The depth to the groundwater surface in temporary monitoring wells TW-1 through TW-9, and
existing monitoring well MWC-1 was measured prior to well purging using a decontaminated
electronic sounder. The wells were surveyed by Progress using a relative benchmark (top of casing
for monitoring well MWC-1) that was arbitrarily given an elevation of 100 feet. The elevations of
the monitoring wells and the groundwater surface are both relative to that benchmark. The relative
groundwater elevations are shown in Table 3 and depicted on Figure 3. Based on information
collected during the assessment activities, the groundwater flow direction beneath the site appears
to be generally to the north-northwest beneath the site.
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS
A summary of the soil analysis is summarized below and in Table 1:

• Laboratory analysis of soil samples S1-5, S2-5, S3-5, S4-5, S5-5, TW1-5, TW2-5, and
TW3-5 detected targeted Priority Pollutant Metals above the laboratory quantitation limits,
but below the NCDENR, Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Soil Remediation Goals
(SRGs) dated July 2013.
• Laboratory analysis of soil sample S2-5 detected fluoranthene at a concentration of 0.044J
parts per million (ppm), which is below its SRG. Based on the detected concentrations of
Priority Pollutant Metals and the lack of additional targeted VOCs, SVOCS, or PCBs being
detected at concentrations exceeding the laboratory detection limit and/or their respective
SRGs, the metals concentrations may represent naturally occurring concentrations.
• Laboratory analysis of soil sample TW8-5 detected gasoline and diesel range TPH above the
North Carolina Action Levels.
• Please note, background soil samples were not collected as part of this assessment. The
laboratory data sheets and chain-of-custody record are attached.

Report of Limited Soil and Groundwater Assessment
Burlington, North Carolina
Progress Project No. 1013130.002
November 12, 2013

4
A summary of the groundwater analysis is summarized below and in Table 2:

• Laboratory analysis of the groundwater samples collected from temporary monitoring wells
TW-1 through TW-3 and monitoring well MWC-1 detected total chromium above its North
Carolina 2L Groundwater Quality Standards (NC2LGWQS).
• Laboratory analysis of the groundwater sample collected from existing monitoring well
MWC-1 also detected total cadmium and total lead above their respective NC2LGWQS.
• Laboratory analysis of the groundwater sample collected from temporary monitoring well
TW-1 also detected benzene, 1,2-dichloroethane, naphthalene, and 1-methylnaphthalene
above their respective NC2LGWQS.
• Laboratory analysis of the groundwater samples collected from temporary monitoring wells
TW-4 through TW-7 did not detect targeted compounds above their respective NC2LGWQS.
• Laboratory analysis of the groundwater samples collected from temporary monitoring wells
TW-8 and TW-9 detected benzene above its NC2LGWQS.
• Laboratory analysis of the groundwater sample collected from temporary monitoring well
TW-8 also detected i-propylbenzene and naphthalene above their respective NC2LGWQS.
• Please note, background groundwater samples were not collected as part of this assessment.
• The elevated concentrations of the detected Priority Pollutant Metals may be attributable to the
turbidity of the groundwater samples.

CONCLUSIONS
Based on the results of the laboratory testing, Progress makes the following conclusions:

• The limited soil and groundwater assessment did not identify evidence of targeted compounds
above the SRGs in the soil samples collected.
• The concentrations of detected petroleum-related compounds in the groundwater samples
collected from temporary monitoring wells TW-1, TW-8, and TW-9 exceed their respective
NC2LGWQS.
• Based upon the calculated groundwater flow direction, the absence of identifiable on-site
sources of petroleum, the proximity to the documented off-site release of petroleum products
at 1845 North Church Street, and the potential for petroleum releases (historical or recent) to
have occurred at 1846 North Church Street, the petroleum-related compounds detected in the
groundwater samples collected from temporary monitoring wells TW-1, TW-8, and TW-9 are
most likely attributable to the off-site release(s) of petroleum products. The low levels of
gasoline and diesel range TPH detected in soil sample TW8-5 may be the result of fluctuations
in the groundwater table or vapors emanating from the impacted groundwater due to the
relatively shallow depth to groundwater.

RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the results of the laboratory testing, Progress makes the following recommendations:

• If USTs, impacted soil, or hazardous materials are encountered during future redevelopment
activities, they should be handled and disposed in accordance with current NCDENR rules
and regulations. Progress recommends that the current property owner be notified and that a
copy of this report be submitted to the NCDENR.

Report of Limited Soil and Groundwater Assessment
Burlington, North Carolina
Progress Project No. 1013130.002
November 12, 2013

5
• Furthermore, Progress also considers this site to be a potential candidate for the North
Carolina Brownfields Program in an effort to limit the liability and exposure to a
prospective developer not deemed responsible for the impacted media at the site. The
Brownfields program requires that an eligibility application be submitted by the
prospective developer, which should include associated documentation (i.e. Phase I ESA
and assessment activities). The eligibility process can take approximately two to six weeks
for the site to be approved for entry into the program. The Brownfields Program could
require additional assessment of the soil and groundwater at the site. The site eligibility
must be determined prior to a property transaction occurring.

CLOSING
This report is intended for the use of Belleau Wood Development, LLC, subject to the contractual
terms agreed to for this project. Reliance on this document by any other party is forbidden without
the express written consent of Progress, and that party's acceptance of mutually agreeable terms
and conditions. Use of this report for purposes beyond those reasonably intended by Belleau Wood
Development, LLC and Progress will be at the sole risk of the user.

We appreciate your selection of Progress for this project and look forward to assisting you further
on this and other projects. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at (336)
722-9999.

Sincerely,

PROGRESS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

Jason T. Ricks Jeffrey A. Ballsieper, L.G.
Senior Environmental Scientist Director of Environmental Services

Attachments: Figures
Tables
Boring Logs
Laboratory Analytical Reports

FIGURES
Figure 1
Topographic Site Map

Intersection of North Graham Hopedale Road and North Church Street
Burlington, Alamance County, North Carolina

Project: N. Graham Hopedale
Client: Belleau Wood Dev.,
LLC
Progress Job #: 1013130.002
P.O. Box 5884
Winston-Salem, NC 27113
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.progressenvironmental.com

USGS 7.5 Minute Series Topographic Map
Contour Interval: 10 feet
Scale: 1” = 2000’
Burlington, N.C.
Date: 1969, Photorevised 1981
Date: November 2013

SITE
Site
MW
C
-
1
TW
-
1
/
TW
1
-
5
TW
-
6
Progress ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.JAB1013130.002 NOV 2013 JTR SHOWNNOV 2013 Figure 2.SKFP.O. Box 5884 WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27113 PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]FIGURE 2 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER SAMPLE LOCATION MAP FORMER TAMP FACILITY INTERSECTION OF N. GRAHAM HOPEDALE ROAD AND N. CHURCH STREET BURLINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA %db("MAG-DATE")PROJECT
20
0
'
1"

=

2
0
0
'
0'GR
A
P
H
I
C

S
C
A
L
E
20
0
'
40
0
'
AP
P
R
O
X
I
M
A
T
E

E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G

M
O
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G

W
E
L
L

L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
AP
P
R
O
X
I
M
A
T
E

T
E
M
P
O
R
A
R
Y

M
O
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G

W
E
L
L

L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N

A
N
D
SO
I
L

S
A
M
P
L
E

L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
TW
-
9
TW
-
2
/
TW
2
-
5
TW
-
3
/
TW
3
-
5
MW
C
-
1
S-
2
S-
3
S-
1 S-
4
S-
5
AP
P
R
O
X
I
M
A
T
E

S
O
I
L

S
A
M
P
L
E

L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
S-
4
TW
-
1
/
TW
1
-
5
TW
-
8
/
TW
8
-
5
TW
-
6
TW
-
4
TW
-
5
TW
-
7
AP
P
R
O
X
I
M
A
T
E

T
E
M
P
O
R
A
R
Y

M
O
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G

W
E
L
L

L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N

MW
C
-
1
GR
O
U
N
D
W
A
T
E
R

C
O
N
T
O
U
R

A
N
D

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

(
I
N
T
E
R
V
A
L

=

2
.
0
0

FT.)
86
.
0
0
CA
L
C
U
L
A
T
E
D

G
R
O
U
N
D
W
A
T
E
R

F
L
O
W

D
I
R
E
C
T
I
O
N
GR
O
U
N
D
W
A
T
E
R

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
(9
2
.
1
3
)
IN
F
E
R
R
E
D

G
R
O
U
N
D
W
A
T
E
R

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
TW
-
1
Progress ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.JAB1013130.002 NOV 2013 JTR SHOWNNOV 2013 Figure 3.SKFP.O. Box 5884 WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27113 PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]FIGURE 3 POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP FORMER TAMP FACILITY INTERSECTION OF N. GRAHAM HOPEDALE ROAD AND N. CHURCH STREET BURLINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA %db("MAG-DATE")PROJECT
20
0
'
1"

=

2
0
0
'
0'GR
A
P
H
I
C

S
C
A
L
E
20
0
'
40
0
'
TW
-
9
91
.
3
5
TW
-
2
86
.
9
7
TW
-
3
85
.
1
9
MW
C
-
1
86
.
1
7
TW
-
1
91
.
4
7
TW
-
8
91
.
5
0
TW
-
6
97
.
0
0
TW
-
4
97
.
1
1
TW
-
5
93
.
9
4
TW
-
7
87
.
8
1
93
.
0
0
91
.
0
0
89
.
0
0
87
.
0
0
AP
P
R
O
X
I
M
A
T
E

E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G

M
O
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G

W
E
L
L

L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
AP
P
R
O
X
I
M
A
T
E

T
E
M
P
O
R
A
R
Y

M
O
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G

W
E
L
L

L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
95
.
0
0
9
5
.
0
0
8
7
.
0
0

TABLES
50
3
5

3
5
5
0

8
0
8
2

8
2
6
0

8
2
7
0
Da
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d

(m
/
d
d
/
y
y
)
Ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e

S
a
m
p
l
e

De
p
t
h

(f
e
e
t

B
L
S
)
S1
-
5

1
0
/
2
/
2
0
1
3

1
-
5

N
A

N
A
BQ
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
0.
1
7
8
BQ
L
14
.
3

2
1
.
3

0
.
0
5
7

3
.
1
7

6
.
8
6
BQL

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
10.0
S2
-
5

1
0
/
2
/
2
0
1
3

1
-
5

N
A

N
A
BQ
L

B
Q
L
0.0
4
4
J
BQ
L

B
Q
L
0.
4
5
6
BQ
L
30
.
9

4
3
.
4

0
.
0
6
8

8
.
8
0

5
.
0
4
BQL

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
29.5
S3
-
5

1
0
/
2
/
2
0
1
3

1
-
5

N
A

N
A
BQ
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
0.
1
8
2
BQ
L
11
.
7

8
.
4
1

0
.
0
3
5

2
.
6
5

3
.
0
8
BQL

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
11.9
S4
-
5

1
0
/
2
/
2
0
1
3

1
-
5

N
A

N
A
BQ
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
0.
6
5
4
BQ
L
39
.
9

6
4
.
4
BQ
L
4.2
4

1
0
.
4
BQL

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
20.8
S5
-
5

1
0
/
2
/
2
0
1
3

1
-
5

N
A

N
A
BQ
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
0.
4
0
8
BQ
L
7.0
7

1
4
.
0
BQ
L
3.8
0

7
.
8
3
BQL

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
30.1
TW
1
-
5

1
0
/
2
/
2
0
1
3

1
-
5

N
A

N
A
BQ
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
0.
1
6
9
BQ
L
8.3
6

8
.
4
3
BQ
L
2.3
1

2
.
7
0
BQL

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
11.2
TW
2
-
5

1
0
/
2
/
2
0
1
3

1
-
5

N
A

N
A
BQ
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
0.
4
1
8
BQ
L
59
.
9

2
2
.
2

0
.
0
4
2

2
5
.
4
BQL

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
58.2
TW
3
-
5

1
0
/
2
/
2
0
1
3

1
-
5

N
A

N
A
BQ
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
0.
6
9
0
BQ
L
95
.
4

4
8
.
2
BQ
L
45
.
0
BQL

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
153
TW
8
-
5

1
0
/
3
0
/
2
0
1
3

1
-
5
24
.
5

1
7
.
6
NA

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A
10

1
0

N
/
A

N
/
A

N
/
A

N
/
A

N
/
A

N
/
A

N
/
A

N
/
A

N
/
A

N
/
A

N
/
A

N
/
A

N
/
A

N
/
A

N
/
A

N
/
A
N/
A

N
/
A

N
/
A

N
/
A

4
6
0

7
8

0
.
6
1

3
2

1
4

2
4
,
0
0
0
/
0
.
2
9
*

6
2
0

4
.
6

1
6
0

4
0
0

6
.
2

7
8

0
.
1
6

4
,
6
0
0
N/
A

N
/
A

N
/
A

N
/
A

4
,
4
0
0

1
,
0
0
0

2
.
4

4
0
0

1
6
0

1
0
0
,
0
0
0
/
5
.
6
*

8
,
2
0
0

6
2

2
,0
0
0

8
0
0

8
2

1
,
0
0
0

2
.
0

6
2
,
0
0
0
N/
A

N
/
A

N
/
A

N
/
A

3
3
0

3
.
4

5
.
8

6
3

3
.
0

3
6
0
,
0
0
0
/
3
.
8
*

7
0
0

1
.
0

1
3
0

2
7
0

0
.90

2
.
1

0
.
2
8

1
,
2
0
0
NO
T
E
S
:
BQ
L

=

B
e
l
o
w

Q
u
a
n
t
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

L
i
m
i
t
s
IH
S
B

S
R
G
s

=

I
n
a
c
t
i
v
e

H
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s

S
i
t
e
s

B
r
a
n
c
h

S
o
i
l

R
e
me
d
i
a
t
i
o
n

G
o
a
l
s

d
a
t
e
d

J
u
l
y

2
0
1
3
*
=

C
h
r
o
m
i
u
m

I
I
I

S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
/
C
h
r
o
m
i
u
m

V
I

S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
BG
S

=

b
e
l
o
w

g
r
o
u
n
d

s
u
r
f
a
c
e
mg
/
k
g

=
m
i
l
l
i
g
r
a
m
s

p
e
r

k
i
l
o
g
r
a
m
NE

=

N
o
t

E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
N/
A

=

N
o
t

A
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
NA

=

N
o
t

A
n
a
l
y
z
e
d
Ta
b
l
e

1
Su
m
m
a
r
y

o
f

S
o
i
l

A
n
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l

R
e
s
u
l
t
s

Fo
r
m
e
r

T
A
M
P

F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
Re
p
o
r
t

o
f

L
i
m
i
t
e
d

S
o
i
l

a
n
d

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
An
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l

M
e
t
h
o
d
T
o
t
a
l

M
e
r
c
u
r
y
Co
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t

o
f

C
o
n
c
e
r
n
Sa
m
p
l
e

I
D
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y

P
o
l
l
u
t
a
n
t

M
e
t
a
l
s
Total Zinc
T
o
t
a
l

A
r
s
e
n
i
c
T
o
t
a
l

B
e
r
y
l
l
i
u
m
T
o
t
a
l

C
a
d
m
i
u
m
T
o
t
a
l

C
h
r
o
m
i
u
m
Total Selenium Total Thallium Total Antimony
F
l
u
o
r
a
n
t
h
e
n
e
Total Lead
T
o
t
a
l

N
i
c
k
e
l
T
a
r
g
e
t
e
d

C
o
m
p
o
u
n
d
s
IH
S
B

S
R
G
s

P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

(
m
g
/
k
g
)
T
o
t
a
l

C
o
p
p
e
r
P
C
B
s
T
o
t
a
l

S
i
l
v
e
r
IH
S
B

S
R
G
s

R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
a
i
l

H
e
a
l
t
h

B
a
s
e
d

(
m
g
/
k
g
)
IH
S
B

S
R
G
s

I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l

H
e
a
l
t
h

B
a
s
e
d

(
m
g
/
k
g
)
G
R
O
D
R
O
NC

A
c
t
i
o
n

L
e
v
e
l

(
m
g
/
k
g
)
=
C
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n

e
x
c
e
e
d
s

t
h
e

I
H
S
B

S
R
G

o
r

t
h
e

N
C

A
c
t
i
on

L
e
v
e
l
80
8
2
We
l
l

I
D

D
a
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d

(
m
/
d
d
/
y
y
)
De
p
t
h

t
o

W
a
t
e
r

(F
t
.

B
e
l
o
w

T
O
C
)

Me
a
s
u
r
e
d

1
0
/
3
1
/
1
3
TW
-
1

1
0
/
3
/
2
0
1
3

1
6
.
6
5
1,
4
9
0

7
.
9
2

0
.
2
J

1
3
.
3

2
5
.
4

0
.
4
1
J

2
.
2
0
BQ
L
0.
9
7

0
.
2
9
J

0
.
6
4
BQ
L

B
Q
L
0.
3
2
J

1
0
1

1
1
.
2
J

8
.
3
5
J
BQ
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
83.0

1
1
8
BQL 38.7 BQL BQL BQL BQL 193
TW
-
2

1
0
/
3
/
2
0
1
3

6
.
6
2

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
QL

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
7.06

1
.
0
7
BQL 83.9

8
1
.
4
BQL 36.4 BQL BQL BQL BQL 91.6
TW
-
3

1
0
/
3
/
2
0
1
3

1
2
.
8
1

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
BQ
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
63.9

5
7
.
9
BQL 33.9 BQL BQL BQL BQL 119
MW
C
-
1

1
0
/
3
/
2
0
1
3

1
3
.
8
3

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
12.3

2
5
.
4

2
4
.
3
BQL 6.20

3
2
.
2
BQL BQL BQL 214
TW
-
4

1
0
/
3
1
/
2
0
1
3

1
5
.
0
7

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A
NA NA NA
TW
-
5

1
0
/
3
1
/
2
0
1
3

1
0
.
6
0

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A
NA NA NA
TW
-
6

1
0
/
3
1
/
2
0
1
3

1
3
.
3
2

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A
NA NA NA
TW
-
7

1
0
/
3
1
/
2
0
1
3

1
8
.
4
2

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A
NA NA NA
TW
-
8

1
0
/
3
1
/
2
0
1
3

1
7
.
2
6
40
6
BQ
L
15
3

1
2
4

5
8
.
5

6
.
8
0

5
9
.
1

1
2
.
8

1
1
.
6
BQ
L
9.
3
0

8
9
.
2

4
0
.
7

1
9
8
NA

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

TW
-
9

1
0
/
3
1
/
2
0
1
3

1
6
.
2
0
2.0
5
BQ
L

B
Q
L
0.
2
4
J
BQ
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
0.1
3
J
BQ
L
0.
5
4
J
NA

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

N
A

1

0
.
4

6
0
0

7
0

6

7
0

7
0

2
5

7
0

7
0

6
0
0

4
0
0

4
0
0

5
0
0

6

3
0

1

N
/
A

2
0

1
0

4
*

2

1
0

1
,
0
00

1

1
0
0

1
5

1
*

2
0

0
.
2
*

1
,
0
0
0
=

V
a
l
u
e
s

a
r
e

t
h
o
s
e

t
h
a
t

e
x
c
e
e
d

t
h
e

N
o
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a

2
L

Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Q
u
a
l
i
t
y

S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d

(
N
C
2
L
G
W
Q
S
)
BQ
L

=

n
o
t

d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d

a
b
o
v
e

l
a
b
o
r
a
t
o
r
y

d
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
Re
s
u
l
t
s

a
r
e

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

i
n

µg/
l
µg/L

=

m
i
c
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

p
e
r

l
i
t
e
r
TO
C

=

t
o
p

o
f

c
a
s
i
n
g
*
=

I
n
t
e
r
i
m

M
a
x
i
m
u
m

A
l
l
o
w
a
b
l
e

C
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
N
-
B
u
t
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
T
o
t
a
l

X
y
l
e
n
e
s
p
-
I
s
o
p
r
o
p
y
l
t
o
l
u
e
n
e
1
,
2
,
4
-
T
r
i
m
e
t
h
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
1
,
3
,
5
-
T
r
i
m
e
t
h
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
P
C
B
s
1
,
2
-
D
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
a
n
e
I
-
P
r
o
p
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
N
a
p
h
t
h
a
l
e
n
e
T
o
l
u
e
n
e
N
-
P
r
o
p
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
S
e
c
-
B
u
t
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
T
e
r
t
-
B
u
t
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
2
-
M
e
t
h
y
l
n
a
p
h
t
h
a
l
e
n
e
1
-
M
e
t
h
y
l
n
a
p
h
t
h
a
l
e
n
e
Total Cadmium Total Chromium
E
t
h
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
An
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l

M
e
t
h
o
d
B
e
n
z
e
n
e
Co
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t

o
f

C
o
n
c
e
r
n
Total Arsenic Total Silver
N
a
p
h
t
h
a
l
e
n
e
Total Beryllium
NC
2
L
G
W
Q
S

(
µg/
l
)
62
5
B
N
A
Ta
b
l
e

2
Su
m
m
a
r
y

o
f

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

A
n
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l

R
e
s
u
l
t
s
Re
p
o
r
t

o
f

L
i
m
i
t
e
d

S
o
i
l

a
n
d

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
Priority Pollutant Metals
Fo
r
m
e
r

T
A
M
P

F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
62
0
0
B
Total Thallium Total Zinc Total Antimony Total Selenium Total Copper Total Mercury Total Nickel Total Lead
TW
-
1

1
0
/
2
/
2
0
1
3

1

1
0
-
2
5

2
5

1
6
.
6
5

1
0
8
.
1
2

9
1
.
4
7
TW
-
2

1
0
/
2
/
2
0
1
3

1

1
0
-
2
5

2
5

6
.
6
2

9
3
.
5
9

8
6
.
9
7
TW
-
3

1
0
/
2
/
2
0
1
3

1

1
0
-
2
5

2
5

1
2
.
8
1

9
8
.
0
0

8
5
.
1
9
MW
C
-
1

1
2
/
7
/
1
9
9
3

2

9
.
4
-
2
9

2
9

1
3
.
8
3

1
0
0
.
0
0

8
6
.
1
7
TW
-
4

1
0
/
3
1
/
2
0
1
3

1

1
0
-
2
0

2
0

1
5
.
0
7

1
1
2
.
1
8

9
7
.
1
1
TW
-
5

1
0
/
3
1
/
2
0
1
3

1

1
0
-
2
0

2
0

1
0
.
6
0

1
0
4
.
5
4

9
3
.
9
4
TW
-
6

1
0
/
3
1
/
2
0
1
3

1

1
0
-
2
0

2
0

1
3
.
3
2

1
1
0
.
3
2

9
7
.
0
0
TW
-
7

1
0
/
3
1
/
2
0
1
3

1

1
0
-
2
5

2
5

1
8
.
4
2

1
0
6
.
2
3

8
7
.
8
1
TW
-
8

1
0
/
3
1
/
2
0
1
3

1

1
0
-
2
5

2
5

1
7
.
2
6

1
0
8
.
7
6

9
1
.
5
0
TW
-
9

1
0
/
3
1
/
2
0
1
3

1

1
0
-
2
5

2
5

1
6
.
2
0

1
0
7
.
5
5

9
1
.
3
5
**

-

T
h
e

t
o
p
-
o
f
-
c
a
s
i
n
g

e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

e
a
c
h

f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
g
w
e
l
l

r
e
l
a
t
i
v
e

t
o

a
n

a
r
b
i
t
r
a
r
y

b
e
n
c
h
m
a
r
k

(
M
W
C
-
1
)

w
as

e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d

w
i
t
h

a
n

a
s
s
u
m
e
d

e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

1
0
0

f
e
e
t
.
--

=

N
o
t

M
e
a
s
u
r
e
d
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e

El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(F
e
e
t

T
O
C
)
*
*
Groundwater Elevation (feet)
De
p
t
h

t
o

W
a
t
e
r

(F
e
e
t

T
O
C
)

Oc
t
o
b
e
r

3
1
,

2
0
1
3
Mo
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

W
e
l
l

ID
In
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n

D
a
t
e
We
l
l

Di
a
m
e
t
e
r

In
c
h
e
s
Sc
r
e
e
n
e
d

In
t
e
r
v
a
l

(f
e
e
t
)

To
t
a
l

D
e
p
t
h

(f
e
e
t
)
Ta
b
l
e

3
We
l
l

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n

I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
Li
m
i
t
e
d

S
o
i
l

a
n
d

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
Fo
r
m
e
r

T
A
M
P

F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y

BORING LOGS
Boring terminated @ 5 feet bls
Remarks:
Total Depth: 5.0'
Project Manager: J. Ballsieper
Casing Diameter:
Hole Diameter: 2.5"Start Date: 10/2/13
Date: October 2013
Location: Burlington, NC
Project: Former TAMP Site
Job No.: 1013130.002
Boring/Well ID:
Geologist:
60
50
40
30
Drilling Method: Geoprobe - Direct Push
20
10
Sample
ID
Complete Date: 10/2/13
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
p
t
h
R
e
c
/
A
d
v
(p
p
m
)
B
l
o
w
s
(
i
n
)
P
I
D Geologic Description
L
i
t
h
o
l
o
g
y
W
a
t
e
r

T
a
b
l
e
Page 1 of 1
30
40
20
10
Well Diagram
S-1
60
50
120 Fayette Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101
[phone]
Mottled Orange, Yellow, and Red
Silty Clay
678.5
Boring terminated @ 5 feet bls
Remarks:
Total Depth: 5.0'
Project Manager: J. Ballsieper
Casing Diameter:
Hole Diameter: 2.5"Start Date: 10/2/13
Date: October 2013
Location: Burlington, NC
Project: Former TAMP Site
Job No.: 1013130.002
Boring/Well ID:
Geologist:
60
50
40
30
Drilling Method: Geoprobe - Direct Push
20
10
Sample
ID
Complete Date: 10/2/13
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
p
t
h
R
e
c
/
A
d
v
(p
p
m
)
B
l
o
w
s
(
i
n
)
P
I
D Geologic Description
L
i
t
h
o
l
o
g
y
W
a
t
e
r

T
a
b
l
e
Page 1 of 1
30
40
20
10
Well Diagram
S-2
60
50
120 Fayette Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101
[phone]
Brown Red Sandy Clay
287.4
Boring terminated @ 5 feet bls
Remarks:
Total Depth: 5.0'
Project Manager: J. Ballsieper
Casing Diameter:
Hole Diameter: 2.5"Start Date: 10/2/13
Date: October 2013
Location: Burlington, NC
Project: Former TAMP Site
Job No.: 1013130.002
Boring/Well ID:
Geologist:
60
50
40
30
Drilling Method: Geoprobe - Direct Push
20
10
Sample
ID
Complete Date: 10/2/13
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
p
t
h
R
e
c
/
A
d
v
(p
p
m
)
B
l
o
w
s
(
i
n
)
P
I
D Geologic Description
L
i
t
h
o
l
o
g
y
W
a
t
e
r

T
a
b
l
e
Page 1 of 1
30
40
20
10
Well Diagram
S-3
60
50
120 Fayette Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101
[phone]
Reddish Brown and Orange
Sandy Clay
645.8
Boring terminated @ 5 feet bls
Remarks:
Total Depth: 5.0'
Project Manager: J. Ballsieper
Casing Diameter:
Hole Diameter: 2.5"Start Date: 10/2/13
Date: October 2013
Location: Burlington, NC
Project: Former TAMP Site
Job No.: 1013130.002
Boring/Well ID:
Geologist:
60
50
40
30
Drilling Method: Geoprobe - Direct Push
20
10
Sample
ID
Complete Date: 10/2/13
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
p
t
h
R
e
c
/
A
d
v
(p
p
m
)
B
l
o
w
s
(
i
n
)
P
I
D Geologic Description
L
i
t
h
o
l
o
g
y
W
a
t
e
r

T
a
b
l
e
Page 1 of 1
30
40
20
10
Well Diagram
S-4
60
50
120 Fayette Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101
[phone]
Red Orange Silty Clay
706.8
Boring terminated @ 5 feet bls
Remarks:
Total Depth: 5.0'
Project Manager: J. Ballsieper
Casing Diameter:
Hole Diameter: 2.5"Start Date: 10/2/13
Date: October 2013
Location: Burlington, NC
Project: Former TAMP Site
Job No.: 1013130.002
Boring/Well ID:
Geologist:
60
50
40
30
Drilling Method: Geoprobe - Direct Push
20
10
Sample
ID
Complete Date: 10/2/13
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
p
t
h
R
e
c
/
A
d
v
(p
p
m
)
B
l
o
w
s
(
i
n
)
P
I
D Geologic Description
L
i
t
h
o
l
o
g
y
W
a
t
e
r

T
a
b
l
e
Page 1 of 1
30
40
20
10
Well Diagram
S-5
60
50
120 Fayette Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101
[phone]
Orange Sandy Clay
3.8
Job No.: 1013130.002
Remarks:
Total Depth: 25.0'
Project Manager: J. Ballsieper
Casing Diameter: 1"
Hole Diameter: 2.5"Start Date: 10/2/2013
Date: October 2013
Location: Burlington, NC
Project: Former TAMP Facility
Boring/Well ID:
Geologist:
60
50
40
30
Drilling Method: Geoprobe - Direct Push
20
10
Sample
ID
Complete Date: 10/2/2013
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
p
t
h
R
e
c
/
A
d
v
(p
p
m
)
B
l
o
w
s
(
i
n
)
P
I
D Geologic Description
L
i
t
h
o
l
o
g
y
W
a
t
e
r

T
a
b
l
e
Page 1 of 1
30
40
20
10
Well Diagram
TW-1/TW1-5
60
50
Boring Terminated @ 25 feet bls
Ground
Surface
(17') #2
Quartz Sand
(15.0') 1"
PVC Screen
120 Fayette Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101
[phone]
Bentonite(10.0') 1"
PVC Casing
Orange Sandy Clay (stained gray-green)
Orange Tan Sandy Clay
Tan to Med. Gray Sand
Brown Orange Silty Clay (Moist)
No Sample
1,902
442.8
1,014
318.4
N/A
Job No.: 1013130.002
Remarks:
Total Depth: 25.0'
Project Manager: J. Ballsieper
Casing Diameter: 1"
Hole Diameter: 2.5"Start Date: 10/2/2013
Date: October 2013
Location: Burlington, NC
Project: Former TAMP Facility
Boring/Well ID:
Geologist:
60
50
40
30
Drilling Method: Geoprobe - Direct Push
20
10
Sample
ID
Complete Date: 10/2/2013
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
p
t
h
R
e
c
/
A
d
v
(p
p
m
)
B
l
o
w
s
(
i
n
)
P
I
D Geologic Description
L
i
t
h
o
l
o
g
y
W
a
t
e
r

T
a
b
l
e
Page 1 of 1
30
40
20
10
Well Diagram
TW-2/TW2-5
60
50
Boring Terminated @ 25 feet bls
Ground
Surface
(17') #2
Quartz Sand
(15.0') 1"
PVC Screen
120 Fayette Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101
[phone]
Bentonite(10.0') 1"
PVC Casing
Med. Gray Sandy Clay
(Moist @ 5')
Gray Med. Grained Sand
Lt. Gray to Tan Silty Clay
Gray to Tan Silty Clay
Tan Silty Sand (Wet)
43.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
Job No.: 1013130.002
Remarks:
Total Depth: 25.0'
Project Manager: J. Ballsieper
Casing Diameter: 1"
Hole Diameter: 2.5"Start Date: 10/2/2013
Date: October 2013
Location: Burlington, NC
Project: Former TAMP Facility
Boring/Well ID:
Geologist:
60
50
40
30
Drilling Method: Geoprobe - Direct Push
20
10
Sample
ID
Complete Date: 10/2/2013
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
p
t
h
R
e
c
/
A
d
v
(p
p
m
)
B
l
o
w
s
(
i
n
)
P
I
D Geologic Description
L
i
t
h
o
l
o
g
y
W
a
t
e
r

T
a
b
l
e
Page 1 of 1
30
40
20
10
Well Diagram
TW-3/TW3-5
60
50
Boring Terminated @ 25 feet bls
Ground
Surface
(17') #2
Quartz Sand
(15.0') 1"
PVC Screen
120 Fayette Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101
[phone]
Bentonite(10.0') 1"
PVC Casing
Gray to Orange Silty Clay
Tan Sand - Saprolite
Tan to Orange Sandy Clay
(Moist)
Brown to Orange Sandy Clay
Burnt Wood Pieces
337.1
37.2
15.8
N/A
Job No.: 1013130.002
Remarks:
Total Depth: 20.0'
Project Manager: J. Ballsieper
Casing Diameter: 1"
Hole Diameter: 2.5"Start Date: 10/30/2013
Date: October 2013
Location: Burlington, NC
Project: Former TAMP Facility
Boring/Well ID:
Geologist:
60
50
40
30
Drilling Method: Geoprobe - Direct Push
20
10
Sample
ID
Complete Date: 10/30/2013
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
p
t
h
R
e
c
/
A
d
v
(p
p
m
)
B
l
o
w
s
(
i
n
)
P
I
D Geologic Description
L
i
t
h
o
l
o
g
y
W
a
t
e
r

T
a
b
l
e
Page 1 of 1
30
40
20
10
Well Diagram
TW-4
60
50
Boring Terminated @ 20 feet bls
Ground
Surface
(12') #2
Quartz Sand(10.0') 1"
PVC Screen
120 Fayette Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101
[phone]
Bentonite(10.0') 1"
PVC Casing
Mottled Reddish Brown to Light
Orange Brown Silt
Reddish Brown fine Sandy Silt
Light Brown Silty Fine Sand
(Moist to Wet)
2.2
2.7
10.6
Job No.: 1013130.002
Remarks:
Total Depth: 20.0'
Project Manager: J. Ballsieper
Casing Diameter: 1"
Hole Diameter: 2.5"Start Date: 10/30/2013
Date: October 2013
Location: Burlington, NC
Project: Former TAMP Facility
Boring/Well ID:
Geologist:
60
50
40
30
Drilling Method: Geoprobe - Direct Push
20
10
Sample
ID
Complete Date: 10/30/2013
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
p
t
h
R
e
c
/
A
d
v
(p
p
m
)
B
l
o
w
s
(
i
n
)
P
I
D Geologic Description
L
i
t
h
o
l
o
g
y
W
a
t
e
r

T
a
b
l
e
Page 1 of 1
30
40
20
10
Well Diagram
TW-5
60
50
Boring Terminated @ 20 feet bls
Ground
Surface
(12') #2
Quartz Sand(10.0') 1"
PVC Screen
120 Fayette Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101
[phone]
Bentonite(10.0') 1"
PVC Casing
Mottled Reddish Brown to Light
Orange Brown Silt
15.5
9.9
9.3
Job No.: 1013130.002
Remarks:
Total Depth: 20.0'
Project Manager: J. Ballsieper
Casing Diameter: 1"
Hole Diameter: 2.5"Start Date: 10/30/2013
Date: October 2013
Location: Burlington, NC
Project: Former TAMP Facility
Boring/Well ID:
Geologist:
60
50
40
30
Drilling Method: Geoprobe - Direct Push
20
10
Sample
ID
Complete Date: 10/30/2013
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
p
t
h
R
e
c
/
A
d
v
(p
p
m
)
B
l
o
w
s
(
i
n
)
P
I
D Geologic Description
L
i
t
h
o
l
o
g
y
W
a
t
e
r

T
a
b
l
e
Page 1 of 1
30
40
20
10
Well Diagram
TW-6
60
50
Boring Terminated @ 20 feet bls
Ground
Surface
(12') #2
Quartz Sand(10.0') 1"
PVC Screen
120 Fayette Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101
[phone]
Bentonite(10.0') 1"
PVC Casing
Reddish Brown to Light
Orange Brown Silty Fine Sand
Reddish Brown to Light
Orange Brown Silt (Moist)
47.8
124.1
93.0
Light Brown Fine to Medium Sand
(Moist)
Job No.: 1013130.002
Remarks:
Total Depth: 25.0'
Project Manager: J. Ballsieper
Casing Diameter: 1"
Hole Diameter: 2.5"Start Date: 10/30/2013
Date: October 2013
Location: Burlington, NC
Project: Former TAMP Facility
Boring/Well ID:
Geologist:
60
50
40
30
Drilling Method: Geoprobe - Direct Push
20
10
Sample
ID
Complete Date: 10/30/2013
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
p
t
h
R
e
c
/
A
d
v
(p
p
m
)
B
l
o
w
s
(
i
n
)
P
I
D Geologic Description
L
i
t
h
o
l
o
g
y
W
a
t
e
r

T
a
b
l
e
Page 1 of 1
30
40
20
10
Well Diagram
TW-7
60
50
Boring Terminated @ 25 feet bls
Ground
Surface
(17') #2
Quartz Sand
(15.0') 1"
PVC Screen
120 Fayette Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101
[phone]
Bentonite(10.0') 1"
PVC Casing
Reddish Brown to Light Orange
Brown Silty Fine Sand
44.5
131.9
231.5
Brownish Orange Fine Sand
(Petroleum Odor)
Job No.: 1013130.002
Remarks:
Total Depth: 25.0'
Project Manager: J. Ballsieper
Casing Diameter: 1"
Hole Diameter: 2.5"Start Date: 10/30/2013
Date: October 2013
Location: Burlington, NC
Project: Former TAMP Facility
Boring/Well ID:
Geologist:
60
50
40
30
Drilling Method: Geoprobe - Direct Push
20
10
Sample
ID
Complete Date: 10/30/2013
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
p
t
h
R
e
c
/
A
d
v
(p
p
m
)
B
l
o
w
s
(
i
n
)
P
I
D Geologic Description
L
i
t
h
o
l
o
g
y
W
a
t
e
r

T
a
b
l
e
Page 1 of 1
30
40
20
10
Well Diagram
TW-8
60
50
Boring Terminated @ 25 feet bls
Ground
Surface
(17') #2
Quartz Sand
(15.0') 1"
PVC Screen
120 Fayette Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101
[phone]
Bentonite(10.0') 1"
PVC Casing
Dark Gray Fine Sand w/gravel
(Petroleum Odor)
Light Brown Fine to Medium Sand
(Moist)
83.7
308.5
5,000+
1,685
Reddish Brown Fine Sandy Silt
Job No.: 1013130.002
Remarks:
Total Depth: 25.0'
Project Manager: J. Ballsieper
Casing Diameter: 1"
Hole Diameter: 2.5"Start Date: 10/30/2013
Date: October 2013
Location: Burlington, NC
Project: Former TAMP Facility
Boring/Well ID:
Geologist:
60
50
40
30
Drilling Method: Geoprobe - Direct Push
20
10
Sample
ID
Complete Date: 10/30/2013
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
p
t
h
R
e
c
/
A
d
v
(p
p
m
)
B
l
o
w
s
(
i
n
)
P
I
D Geologic Description
L
i
t
h
o
l
o
g
y
W
a
t
e
r

T
a
b
l
e
Page 1 of 1
30
40
20
10
Well Diagram
TW-9
60
50
Boring Terminated @ 25 feet bls
Ground
Surface
(17') #2
Quartz Sand
(15.0') 1"
PVC Screen
120 Fayette Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101
[phone]
Bentonite(10.0') 1"
PVC Casing
Brownish Orange Silty Fine Sand
Light Brown Fine to Medium Sand
(Moist)
167.1
397
392
N/A

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS