20023_Sealtest Dairy_Approved EMP_2016.04.29

NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in the
North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a project manager for the program.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments to their project manager prior to any site earthmoving or other
development related activities. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it must be completed,
reviewed by the program, and signed by all signers at the bottom. Consult your project
manager if you have questions.

GENERAL INFORMATION

Date: 4/25/2016

Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Former Sealtest Dairy

Brownfields Project Number: 20023-16-018

Brownfields Property Address: 2115 US Highway 70 SE

Brownfields Property Area (acres): 1.7 acres

Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit? ☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click here to enter text.

Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit? ☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click here to enter text.

COMMUNICATIONS

Prospective Developer (PD): HICKORY, NC (2115 US HWY 70 SE) LLC
Phone Numbers: Office: 630-617-9151…..Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Primary PD Contact: Dan Uebelhor
Phone Numbers: Office: 630-617-9151 Mobile: [phone]
Email:
Environmental Consultant: ECS Carolinas, LLP
Phone Numbers: Office: 336-856-7150…..Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Brownfields Program Project Manager: Joselyn Harriger
Office: Charlotte
1
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
Email: [e-mail]

Other DENR Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste): Click here to enter text.

NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM

Advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept minimum
notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task:
On-site assessment or remedial activities: Within 10 days ☒
Construction or grading start: Within 10 days ☒
Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: Within 48 hours ☒
Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood, or soil erosion control
measures in area of contamination, venting of explosive environments):
Within 48 hours ☒
Installation of mitigation systems: Within 10 days ☒
Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement
redevelopment activities: (as applicable): Within 30 days ☒

REDEVELOPMENT PLANS

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
☐ Residential ☐ Recreational ☐ Institutional ☒ Commercial ☐ Office ☒Retail ☐ Industrial
☒ Other specify: restaurant

2) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (attach conceptual or detailed plans as available):
a) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
b) Do plans include removal of building foundation slab(s) or pavement:
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
c) Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement and other structures: The three structures on the site, one commercial and
two residential, are scheduled to be demolished April 28, 2016. Following removal of the
buildings, the grading contractor will balance the site by digging into the slope north of the
commercial structure and using the fill to balance the site; i.e. raise the south and north sides
of the site. A utility trench for the storm water will be excavated (east to west) north of the
proposed building. A copy of the grading plan and utility plan are attached. A new 6,900 SF
Commercial / Restaurantl building will be constructed, along with associated parking and
utility improvements.

2
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
3) Which category of risk-based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement?
☐ Residential ☒ Non-residential or Industrial/Commercial

Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall be cited in the Brownfields
Agreement for comparison purposes.

4) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Phase I start date and anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
April 28, 2016 – Three week duration for demolition of the buildings, mass grading and insttaltion
of stormwater sedimentation basins.

b) If applicable, Phase 2 start date and anticipated duration (specify activities during each
phase):
May 20, 2016 – Four month duration consisting of uitilities, building and paving

c) Additional phases planned? If yes, specify activities if known:
☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Not in the foreseeable future ☐Decision pending
d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 9/16/2016

CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Contaminated Media (attach tabulated data summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with
sample locations):
Part 1. Soil: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 2. Groundwater: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 3. Surface Water: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 4. Sediment: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 5. Soil Vapor: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 6. Sub-Slab Soil Vapor: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 7. Indoor Air: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected

PART 1. SOIL – Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate
using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.

1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list specific compounds): Chromium (III) 26.8 to 54.2
ppm; total lead 34.9 to 18.9 ppm; chromium (VI) not detected above reporting limit (chromium
therefore naturally occurring) near western residential structure. Petroleum hydrocarbons
associated with the heating oil, diesel, and gasoline USTs.
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet): 3 to 5 feet for metals and between 8 and 17
feet for USTs
3
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet): Metals by residence naturally occurring
and collected from boring adjacent to one of the residences. No cut proposed for this area of the
site, fill area. May possibly encounter impacted soil during trench excavation for the utility trench
and excavation of the sedimentation basin on the west side of the site. Figure attached.
4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet): 0 to 4 feet
5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan): none expecxted
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
none
7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable: none
IMPORTED FILL SOIL

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported? Click here to enter text.
3) If yes, what is the depth of fill soil to be used at the property? Click here to enter text.
If a range of depths, please list the range.

4) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide plan to analyze fill soil to
demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards and can be considered clean for use at the
Brownfields property (Check all that apply):
☐ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☐ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☐ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury, lead,
selenium and silver)
☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List -14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver,
thallium, and zinc)
☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium (speciated
according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver, thallium, and
zinc)
☐ Other Constituents & Analytical Method: Click here to enter text.
☐ Known borrow material (DESCRIBE SOURCE AND ATTACH SAMPLING PROFILE): Click here
to enter text.

MANAGING ONSITE SOIL

1) If soil in known or suspected areas of contamination is anticipated to be excavated from the
Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields Property,or otherwise disturbed during site
grading or other redevelopment activities, please provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates
areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are acceptable, if only preliminary data
available).

2) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION – Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the
North Carolina Hazardous Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35? ☐ Yes ☒ No

4
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes generating the
waste( include pertinent analytical results as needed). Click here to enter text.

If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained-Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the North Carolina
Contained-In Policy? ☐ Yes ☐ No

NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS THE
CONTAINED-OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA CONTAINED-IN POLICY THE
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENR
HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.

3) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION – Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?:
☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).

☐ Ignitability
☐ Corrosivity
☐ Reactivity
☐ Toxicity
☐ TCLP results
☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual hazardous
constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory TCLP standard)

If no, explain rationale: Soil to be cut from the slope behind the building is not known to be
contaminated.

NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE SOIL MAY NOT
BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENR HAZARDOUS WASTE
SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.

4) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
☐ Preliminary Health-Based Residential SRGs Click here to enter a date.
☒ Preliminary Health-Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs 5/20/2016
☐ Site-specific risk-based cleanup level, or acceptable concentrations determined via
calculated cumulative risk. Enter details of methods used for determination/explanation:
Five soil samples will be collected from areas which will be vegetated once the site grading is
complete. The samples will be collected in accordance with NCDWM IHSB protocol as described in the
most recent version of “Guidelines for Assessment and Remediation”. Each sample will be analyzed
by EPA method 8260 and 8270.

5
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
5) Check the following action(s) to be taken during excavation and management of said soils:

☒ Manage fugitive dust from site:
☒ Yes ☐ No
If yes, describe method; If no, explain rationale: If dust is an issue a water truck will be used
to wet the soil.

☒ Field Screening:
☒ Yes ☐ No
If yes, describe method; If no, explain rationale: Grading contractor will screen soil for
staining and odor during excavation. A technician will be on site during the excavation of the utility
trench ande sedimentation basin. If suspect soils are encountered, the grading contractor will stop
work in the area and ECS will be contacted and the soil will be screened with a PID/FID.

☒ Soil Sample Collection:
☒ Yes ☐ No
If yes, describe method (e.g., in-situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.); If no, explain rationale:
Soil being excavated is being used for onsite fill and will either be placed in the area of the proposed
building pad and parking lot or will be placed on the north side of the site. If impacted soil is
discovered it will either be placed immediately in a low area and covered with a minum one foot thick
cap of clean soil before the end of the day or the soil will be temporarly stockpiled until the placement
area is prepared and/or sufficient clean soil (cap) is available. Impacted soil from the UST areas may
also be placed in the basement of the western house and covered with a minimum of two feet of
clean fill. If areas of impacted soil are discovered, other than in the areas of the USTs, a sample will be
collected and analyzed by EPA Method 8260 and 8270. Additional analysis will be performed if
warrented. The Brownfields Project Manager will be notified if other areas of impacted soil are
discovered other than those currently known or suspected.
☐ Stockpile impacted soil in accordance with NCDENR IHSB protocol in the current version of
the “Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup”, and providing erosion control, prohibiting
contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, and preventing
contaminated runoff. Explain any variances:

☒ Analyze potentially impacted soil for the following chemical analytes:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☐ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury,
lead, selenium and silver)
☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List -14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,
chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel,
selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc)
☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver,
thallium, and zinc)
☐ Other Constituent(s) & Analytical Method(s): Click here to enter text.
6
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014

☒ Proposed Measures to Obtain Pre-Approval for Reuse of Impacted Soil within the
Brownfields Property Boundary
☐ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
☒ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on
site map to Brownfields Project Manager once known
☐ Use geotextile to mark depth of fill material (provide description of material)
☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☐ or clean fill ☒
Describe cap or fill: A minimum 2 foot cap of clean fill from site. (provide location
diagram)
☐ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re-
recorded if actions are Post-Recordation).
☐ Other: Click here to enter text.

☒ Final grade sampling of exposed soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or permanent
hardscape): [if not checked provide rationale for not needing]
Provide diagram of soil sampling locations, number of samples, and denote Chemical
Analytical Program with check boxes below (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☐ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury,
lead, selenium and silver)
☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List -14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,
chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel,
selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc)
☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver,
thallium, and zinc)
☐ Pesticides
☐ PCBs
☐ Other Constituents & Analytical Method: Click here to enter text.
OFFSITE TRANSPORT & DISPOSITION OF EXCAVATED SOIL
NOTE: Unless soil will be transported offsite for disposal in a permitted facility under applicable
regulations, no contaminated or potentially contaminated soil may leave the site without approval
from the brownfields program. Failure to obtain approval may violate a brownfields agreement,
endangering liability protections and making said action subject to enforcement. Justifications
provided below must be approved by the Program in writing prior to completing transport activities.
☒ Transport and dispose of impacted soil offsite (documentation of final disposition must be sent to
Brownfields Project Manager)
☐ Landfill – analytical program determined by landfill
☒ Landfarm or other treatment facility Petroleum impacted soil will be taken to
Environmental Soils in Latitmore, North Carolina.
☐ Use as Beneficial Fill Offsite – provide justification: Click here to enter text.
☐ Use as Beneficial Fill at another Suitable Brownfields Site – (Note: a determination that a
site is a “Suitable Brownfields” site will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same
or similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil as beneficial soil will not
7
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
increase the potential for risk to human health and the environment at that site, and that notarized
documentation of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of the receiving site is
provided to Brownfields. Provide justification: Click here to enter text.

MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES
☒ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)

☐ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they were
removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth from
which it was excavated.

☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport, and/or
degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants? Result: Yes □ No □
If no, include rationale here. Click here to enter text.
If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches: The liner will consist of six mil
plastic

PART 2. GROUNDWATER – Please fill out the information below and attach figure showing
distribution of groundwater contaminants at site

What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property? 43 to 45 ft

Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☐onsite ☐ offsite ☐ both ☒ or unknown
sources? Describe source(s): Former auto repair facilty located on adjacent property east of the site
(now a car wash). Groundwater analysis summarized in Table 1 attached.

What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property? Not determined but believed
to be to the south based on surface topography.

Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, describe these activities: Click here to enter text.

In the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if
no is checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of
groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary
sewer, or sampling procedures): Click here to enter text.

PART 3. SURFACE WATER – Please fill out the information below.
Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
8
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014

Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☒ No

Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☒ No

In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment activities, or
clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of such events (e.g.
flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts): Click here to enter text.

PART 4. SEDIMENT – Please fill out the information below.
Is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☒ No

Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☒ No

If yes, attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.

In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance): Click here to enter text.

PART 5. SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below.
Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following
vapor intrusion screening levels in the following media:

IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
Groundwater: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown

IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
Groundwater: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown

Attach a map showing the location of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site screening levels.

If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated? Click here to enter text.

Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown

In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities (trenches,
manways, basements or other subsurface work, list activities for management of such contact:
Remove workers from area unitl the vapor concentrations can be determined, use engineering
controls; i.e. fans to reduce vapor concentrations

9
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014

PART 6. SUB-SLAB SOIL VAPOR -please fill out the information below if existing buildings or
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment.

Are sub-slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown

If data indicate that sub-slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map showing
the location of these exceedances.

At what depth(s) is sub-slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☐ 0-6 inches ☐ Other, If other
describe: Click here to enter text.

Will workers encounter contaminated sub-slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown

In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact: Click here to enter text.

PART 7. INDOOR AIR – Please fill out the information below .

Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown

If yes, attach a map showing the location where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.

If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk-based screening levels will not
be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated indoor air
during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown

In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact: Click here to enter text.

PART 8 – Vapor Mitigation System – Please fill out the information below .

Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system proposed for this Brownfields Property?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown

If yes, provide the date the plan was submitted to the Brownfields Program.
Click here to enter a date.
Attach the plan.

Has the vapor mitigation plan been approved by the NC Brownfields Program?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
10
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
Has the vapor mitigation plan been signed and sealed by a North Carolina professional engineer?
☐ Yes ☐ No

What are the components of the vapor intrusion mitigation system?
☐ Sub-slab depressurization system
☐ Sub-membrane depressurization system
☐ Block-wall depressurization system
☐ Drain tile depressurization system
☐ Passive mitigation methods
☐ Vapor barriers
☐ Perforated piping vented to exterior
☐ Other method: Click here to enter text.

PART 9. CONTINGENCY FOR ENCOUNTERING UNKNOWN TANKS, DRUMS, OR OTHER WASTE
MATERIALS

Please provide a contingency plan in the event unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other
waste materials are encountered during site activities.

Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth-moving activities at
the site:
☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
☐ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility lines, etc.
☒ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors

Notification to State Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of contamination are
discovered. See Notification Section on Page 1 for notification requirements.

POST-REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
In accordance with the site’s Brownfield Agreement, provide a report within the designated schedule
to the State Brownfields Project Manager.

☒ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a redevelopment summary report in compliance
with the site’s Brownfields Agreement.

11
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
SOURCE:

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
HICKORY, NORTH CAROLINA
QUADRANGLE, DATED 1993

FIGURE 1

SITE LOCATION MAP

2115 HIGHWAY 70 SE
HICKORY, CATAWBA COUNTY, NC
ECS PROJECT NO. 49-1624B
SITE
APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY
2,000’
SOURCE:

CATAWBA COUNTY GIS WEBSITE
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH, DATED 2014

FIGURE 2

SITE MAP

2115 HIGHWAY 70 SE
HICKORY, CATAWBA COUNTY, NC
ECS PROJECT NO. 49-1624B
LEGEND
CURRENT/FORMER AUTO REPAIR
BUSINESS APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY

A
200’

A
A
SOURCE:

CATAWBA COUNTY GIS WEBSITE
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH, DATED 2014

SCALE = NTS

FIGURE 3

SAMPLE LOCATION MAP

2115 HIGHWAY 70 SE
HICKORY, CATAWBA COUNTY, NC
ECS PROJECT NO. 49-1624B


SB-1

GWB-2
GWB-1 

MW-1 
SOURCE:

MODIFIED FROM COMMERCIAL
SITE DESIGNS’ GRADING PLAN

SCALE = NTS

FIGURE 4

FINAL GRADE SAMPLE LOCATIONS

2115 HIGHWAY 70 SE
HICKORY, CATAWBA COUNTY, NC
ECS PROJECT NO. 49-1624B

MW-1 
Approximate Site Boundary


GWB-2
GWB-1



EXPLANATION
Proposed Soil Sample Locations

Proposed Fill Areas



Fo
r
m
e
r

S
e
a
l
t
e
s
t

D
a
i
r
y
21
1
5

H
i
g
h
w
a
y

7
0

S
E
Hi
c
k
o
r
y
,

C
a
t
a
w
b
a

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

N
o
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
ECS Project 49.1624B
TA
B
L
E

1
:

H
I
S
T
O
I
C
A
L

G
R
O
U
N
D
W
A
T
E
R

R
E
S
U
L
T
S
Pa
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n

M
W
-
1

G
W
B
-
1

G
W
B
-
2

M
W
-
1
Da
t
e

S
a
m
p
l
e
d

1
0
/
0
1
/
1
3
3/
1
0
/
1
6
Ch
l
o
r
o
f
o
r
m

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

B
Q
L

1
.
3
5

7
0
Te
t
r
a
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
e
n
e
2.
3
BQ
L

B
Q
L
1.
8
3
0.7
Tr
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
f
l
o
u
r
o
m
e
t
h
a
n
e
2.
4
BQ
L
BQ
L
2,000
Al
l

T
a
r
g
e
t
e
d

C
o
m
p
o
u
n
d
s

N
S

B
Q
L

B
Q
L
NS
--
Ch
r
o
m
i
u
m

N
S
0.
1
5
2
0.
4
1
6
NS

0
.
0
1
0
Le
a
d
NS
0.
0
1
7
9

0
.
0
4
7
2
NS

0
.
0
1
5
Bo
l
d
=

C
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n

e
x
c
e
e
d
s

t
h
e

2
L

S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
BQ
L

=

B
e
l
o
w

t
h
e

l
a
b
o
r
a
t
o
r
y

q
u
a
n
t
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

l
i
m
i
t

o
f

t
h
e
m
e
t
h
o
d

o
f

a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
2L Standard
VO
C
s

b
y

E
P
A

M
e
t
h
o
d

8
2
6
0
/
6
0
2
10
/
1
5
/
1
5
Me
t
a
l
s
AN
A
L
Y
T
I
C
A
L

R
E
S
U
L
T
S
SV
O
C
s

b
y

E
P
A

M
e
t
h
o
d

8
2
7
0
Former Sealtest Dairy
2115 Highway 70 SE
Hickory, Catawba, North Carolina
ECS Project 09.26039B
TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Parameter
Sample ID SB1-3 SB1-5
Collection Depth
(feet bgs)3 5
Collection Date
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by UVF
GRO <0.36 <0.19 10 -- --
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by UVF
DRO <0.14 <0.08 10 -- --
Chromium and Lead
Chromium (Cr+3)54.2 26.8 -- 24,000 360,000
Lead 18.9 34.9 -- 400 270
Hexavalent Chromium
Cr+6 ND NSF -- -- --
Notes:
Results presented in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), parts per million (ppm)
Feet bgs = Feet below ground surface
UVF = Ultraviolet Fluorescence
BQL = Below Quantitation Limit
ND = Not Detected
BOLD = Concentration Exceeds Action Level
IHSB = Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
SRG = Soil Remediation Goal
IHSB Protction of
Groundwater
SRG
Comparison Criteria
IHSB Health-
Based
SRG
State
Action
Level
10/15/15