4112_WhiteStreet_GWMReport_DIN26361_20151007

White Street Landfill – Phase III
Permit #41-12
Detection Monitoring October 2015
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
Prepared for:
The City of Greensboro
Prepared by:
S&ME, Inc.
8646 W Market St, Suite 105
Greensboro, NC 27409
January 29, 2016
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 29, 2016 ii
Table of Contents
1.0 Executive Summary...............................................................................................1
2.0 Introduction............................................................................................................2
3.0 Scope Of Work.......................................................................................................2
4.0 Methods Employed...............................................................................................2
4.1 Monitoring Well Sampling..............................................................................................2
4.2 Statistical Analysis of Data..............................................................................................3
4.2.1 Software...............................................................................................................................3
4.2.2 Statistical Methods-Groundwater Analyses.......................................................................3
4.3 Stream Sampling...............................................................................................................4
5.0 Results......................................................................................................................4
5.1 Groundwater Analytical Results....................................................................................4
5.2 Statistical Results..............................................................................................................5
5.2.1 Overview of Database..........................................................................................................5
5.2.2 Statistical Analyses.............................................................................................................5
5.2.2.1 Descriptive Statistics........................................................................................................5
5.2.2.2 Time vs. Concentration Graphs......................................................................................6
5.2.2.3 Interwell Statistical Comparisons...................................................................................7
5.2.2.4 Non-Parametric Tolerance Limits Test..........................................................................7
5.3 Hydraulic Conductivity...................................................................................................7
5.4 Groundwater Flow Direction and Rate.........................................................................7
5.5 Surface Water....................................................................................................................8
5.6 Leachate Sample Analytical Results ..............................................................................9
5.7 Quality Assurance............................................................................................................9
6.0 References...............................................................................................................9
7.0 Certification..........................................................................................................10
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 29, 2016 iii
Appendices
Tables
Figures
Appendix I – Field Sampling Data Sheets
Appendix II – Laboratory Analytical Report
Appendix III – Descriptive Statistics
Appendix IV – Time vs. Concentration Graphs
Appendix V – Non-Parametric Upper Tolerance Limit Computations
Appendix VI – NCDEQ EDDS (CD only)
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 29, 2016 1
1.0 Executive Summary
Twelve groundwater monitoring wells and three stream locations at the lined Subtitle D White Street
Landfill were sampled between October 5 and October 6, 2015. Ten wells (MW-17, MW-18, MW-19, MW-
20, MW-21, MW-22, MW-23, MW-24, MW-25, and MW-25D) comprise the groundwater monitoring
system for the lined Subtitle D solid waste disposal area of the landfill, also known as Phase III.
Monitoring wells MW-15 and MW-16 serve as background wells for Phase III. The collected samples were
submitted to a North Carolina certified laboratory for analysis using the federal Appendix I list of volatile
organic and inorganic constituents for detection monitoring. Samples from surface water locations SW-1,
SW-2 and SW-3 were analyzed for federal Appendix I detection monitoring constituents. The following
summarizes the findings for this event.
♦Groundwater sample analyses detected no Appendix I volatile organic compounds at the
sampled locations.
♦Groundwater sample analyses report no Appendix I metals at concentrations which exceed the
corresponding NCAC 2L groundwater quality standards. Antimony, cobalt and vanadium were
detected in groundwater samples. Since there are no established NCAC 2L standards for these
metals, the results were compared with the North Carolina, Interim Maximum Allowable
Concentrations (IMAC). The only detection of antimony was at background well MW-16. The
estimated antimony concentration of 2.25 µg/L was greater than the corresponding IMAC
established at 1 µg/L. The vanadium concentration reported for background well MW-16 was
similar to the concentrations detected in the compliance wells, which were also greater than the
corresponding IMAC. The estimated cobalt concentrations at wells MW-18, MW-19, and MW-24
were greater than the corresponding IMAC standard. Time vs concentration plots for antimony,
cobalt, and vanadium were examined and do not suggest trends of increasing concentrations
over time, many plots suggest generally stable concentrations over time. These findings support
an assertion that these metal concentrations are representative of natural background conditions.
♦The groundwater analytical results were examined for evidence of statistically significant increases
(SSIs) over background values. The statistical analyses suggest that no SSIs occurred during this
groundwater monitoring event. Based on a finding of no SSIs, the reported concentrations were
not considered indicative of a release from the monitored unit.
♦Two volatile organic compounds and several inorganic constituents were reported in one or more
of the surface water samples collected. Based on the sampled locations and the reported
concentrations, the compounds detected in the surface water samples originate up-stream and
do not suggest a release of these constituents from the monitored unit.
S&ME previously completed an Alternate Source Demonstration (ASD) for metals in the adjoining Phase II
portion of the Facility. The results of the ASD advocate that antimony, cobalt, and vanadium
concentrations reported above the respective IMAC values are not likely due to a release by the Facility,
but instead may be attributed to the natural occurrence of these metals in the native, residual soil at
concentrations sufficient to influence the concentrations in groundwater samples. Although the ASD was
undertaken in the Phase II portion of the Facility, the ASD results are likely applicable to Phase III.
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 29, 2016 2
2.0 Introduction
White Street Landfill is a Solid Waste Management Facility (SWMF) located at the north end of White
Street in northeastern Greensboro. The City of Greensboro operates this lined Subtitle D landfill, referred
to as Phase III, under Solid Waste Permit #41-12. Ten wells (MW-17, MW-18, MW-19, MW-20, MW-21,
MW-22, MW-23, MW-24, MW-25, and MW-25D) comprise the groundwater monitoring system for the
lined Subtitle D solid waste disposal area of the landfill. Monitoring wells MW-15 and MW-16 serve as
background wells for Phase III. The monitoring well locations are shown on Figure 1
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) was contracted by the City of Greensboro to conduct this semi-annual water quality
monitoring event. Groundwater samples were collected from two up-gradient and 10 down-gradient
monitoring wells located along the perimeter of the Phase III disposal area. Surface water samples were
collected at surface water location SW-1, SW-2, and SW-3. Sampling was conducted in accordance with
the approved site Water Quality Monitoring Plan.
The Phase III monitoring well samples were analyzed for the RCRA Subtitle D Appendix I parameters. The
surface water samples were also analyzed for the Appendix I list of constituents. This report discusses the
field procedures, summarizes the field measurements and analytical results, and presents the statistical
evaluation results for the October 2015 water quality monitoring event.
3.0 Scope Of Work
S&ME completed the following tasks as part of this monitoring event:
♦Sampled twelve monitoring wells and three surface water locations.
♦Obtained field values for pH, temperature, conductivity, dissolved oxygen (DO), oxidation-
reduction potential (ORP), and turbidity at each groundwater sample location.
♦Collected depth to water measurements prior to sampling and during well purging to monitor
drawdown.
♦Had the samples analyzed for Appendix I constituents by a North Carolina certified laboratory
using State approved methods.
♦Determined groundwater flow rates and directions at the Phase III area monitoring well locations.
♦Collected a sample of landfill leachate from the wet well for laboratory analyses.
♦Prepared and submitted reports to the City of Greensboro and the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, Division of Waste Management, Solid Waste Section (NCDEQ-SWS).
4.0 Methods Employed
4.1 Monitoring Well Sampling
On October 5 and 6, 2015, monitoring wells MW-15, MW-16, MW-17, MW-18, MW-19, MW-20, MW-21,
MW-22, MW-23, MW-24, MW-25, and MW-25D were sampled. Prior to sampling, each well was opened
and the static water level was measured from the top edge of the PVC casing. Since dedicated
MicroPurge pumps were previously installed in each groundwater monitoring well as described in the
monitoring well construction details reported in the “Baseline Groundwater Monitoring Report, Phase III”
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 29, 2016 3
prepared by G.N. Richardson and Associates, dated May 1998, low-flow sampling techniques were used
for groundwater sample collection. Monitoring well construction details from the same report were used
to determine the volume of water in the monitoring wells.Table 1 provides a summary of relevant well
construction details.
At each well, the purge rate and the water level drawdown were monitored as an indicator of how much
stress the purging placed on the aquifer. The purge rates were calculated by recording the time required
to fill a graduated cylinder. The purging flow rates were approximately 100 milliliters/minute (ml/min.).
During purging, the depth to water was periodically monitored and recorded on the field data sheets. For
this event the measured drawdown in the sampled wells was generally less than 3 feet. It is our opinion
that the observed drawdowns were generally minor during purging; therefore, the stresses placed on the
aquifer should have been minor. The observed drawdown data suggests that the purging rates should
have been low enough such that recharge water should not have been overly agitated, reducing the
potential for colloids to be drawn into the well bore.
The purge water from the monitoring wells was monitored in the field for pH, temperature, conductivity,
DO, and ORP using a flow-through cell and multi-meter. Typically, a sample was collected when three
consecutive readings for each individual field parameter fluctuated by no more than 10 percent, between
each equipment volume. The 10% change target stabilization goal was generally reached prior to
collection of the groundwater samples. Turbidity was measured separately, with field measurements less
than or equal to 10 NTUs, as a goal. Even with the use of low flow sampling methods, turbidity values at
some wells remained higher than ideal during purging. Accordingly, some samples were collected based
upon professional judgment without meeting the turbidity goal. The field data collected during sampling
was recorded on the groundwater sampling field data sheets included in Appendix I.Table 2 provides a
summary of the field data collected during this event.
Groundwater samples were collected from the dedicated pump discharge Teflon tubing at the top of each
well. Immediately upon collection, each sample was placed into laboratory supplied containers, placed in
a cooler with ice, and placed under chain-of-custody. The sampling technician wore nitrile gloves, which
were changed between wells to reduce the potential for cross contamination. The groundwater samples
collected were analyzed for Appendix I volatile organic and inorganic constituents. Analyses were
conducted by Environmental Conservation Laboratories, a North Carolina certified laboratory.
4.2 Statistical Analysis of Data
4.2.1 Software
The groundwater analytical data were analyzed using ChemStat 6.2 software package. An Excel
spreadsheet was used to create a data file composed of recent and historic laboratory data. The Excel file
was then converted to a tab delimited file for use by the ChemStat software. The following procedures
were used to carry out statistical analyses of the data for each constituent detected during this monitoring
event.
4.2.2 Statistical Methods-Groundwater Analyses
In accordance with the NCDEQ-Solid Waste Management Rules 15A NCAC 13B, Section 1632, historical
up-gradient, cross-gradient, and background groundwater monitoring data collected from the monitoring
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 29, 2016 4
wells that comprise the Subtitle D monitoring well system were pooled and the analytical results were
used to create a statistical baseline for statistically significant increases in constituent concentrations. This
sampling round (October 2015) will be incorporated into the database for the next round of sampling.
The following procedure was used to analyze each new data set.
♦A descriptive statistics were run to provide mean, standard deviation, variance, and percentage
non-detects.
♦Normality/Data Distribution Tests were run and used to determine the statistical distribution of
the database for each quantified parameter. The data distribution test results were utilized to
determine if a data set exhibits a normal, log-normal or non-normal distribution. Due to the large
number of non-detects and the lack of normality in the data sets, non-parametric statistical
methods were deemed appropriate for the evaluation of the current compliance data set.
♦Time versus concentration graphs were prepared for each parameter detected at a quantifiable
concentration and used to evaluate data trends and to identify potential data outliers. If further
trend analysis was warranted, Mann-Kendall Trend analyses were performed as additional tests
for indications of an upward trend of concentrations over time.
♦A statistical Upper Limit was calculated for each of the detected parameter data sets utilizing
Non-Parametric Upper Tolerance Limits. Then the compliance data were compared via an Inter-
Well comparison to the statistical Upper Limit to determine if an SSI had occurred. For all
statistical analyses, the non-detect values were converted to the respective Detection Limit for
data analysis.
♦If data indicated a statistically significant increases across the site, the results are examined to
determine the validity of results.
4.3 Stream Sampling
Surface water sampling took place on October 7, 2015. Three stream samples (SW-1, SW-2 and SW-3)
were collected in accordance with the approved site Sampling and Analysis Plan. The stream sample
locations are indicated on Figure 2. The surface water samples were collected by immersing laboratory-
supplied containers in the water to be sampled. After collection, the surface water samples were placed in
a cooler with ice and managed under chain-of-custody. All stream samples were analyzed for Appendix I
constituents by Environmental Conservation Laboratories.
5.0 Results
5.1 Groundwater Analytical Results
Table 3 provides a summary of the constituent concentrations reported above the method detection limit
(MDL) for the groundwater samples collected. Concentrations reported between the MDL and the Solid
Waste Section Limits (SWSL) are considered estimated, thus shown as a “J” flagged concentration.Table
4 provides a summary of the reported concentrations which exceed the 15A NCAC 2L Standards (2L
Standard). For some constituents where there is no established 2L Standard, North Carolina has
published Interim Maximum Allowable Concentrations (IMACs). The IMAC values are intended to help
NCDEQ in assessing conditions and setting health protective groundwater levels at regulated sites. As
such the IMAC are only interim and not final groundwater quality standards. The following summarizes
the exceedances of the corresponding 2L Standard or IMAC.
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 29, 2016 5
Appendix I volatile organic compounds
♦No Appendix I volatile organic compounds were detected in the monitoring wells sampled
during this event.
Appendix I metals
Appendix I metals antimony, barium, beryllium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, nickel, vanadium and zinc
were detected at one or more of the wells sampled. The following lists constituents with concentrations
that exceed the corresponding 2L Standards or IMACs.
♦Currently there is no established 2L Standard for antimony; however, North Carolina has a
published IMAC established at 1 µg/L. Antimony was only detected at background monitoring
well MW-16 with an estimated concentration that was greater than the corresponding IMAC.
♦Currently there is no established 2L Standard for cobalt; however, North Carolina has a published
IMAC established at 1 µg/L. Each of the cobalt concentrations reported were estimated values,
which were greater than the corresponding IMAC.
♦Currently there is no established 2L Standard for vanadium; however, North Carolina has
published an IMAC established at 0.3 µg/L. Each of the vanadium concentrations were estimated
values, which were greater than the corresponding IMAC.
The complete laboratory analytical reports are included in Appendix II.
5.2 Statistical Results
5.2.1 Overview of Database
The “Baseline Groundwater Monitoring Report, Phase III Cell, White Street Sanitary Landfill,” prepared by
G.N. Richardson & Associated, dated June 1998, summarizes the baseline monitoring data. The baseline
monitoring samples were collected using the hand bailing procedures outlined in the approved Water
Quality Monitoring Plan. Prior to the October 1998 monitoring event, but subsequent to the Baseline
Groundwater Monitoring Report, the facility’s approved Water Quality Monitoring Plan was modified to
permit the use of dedicated MicroPurge pumps for monitoring well sample collection.
The statistical evaluations discussed herein were only performed on parameters detected during the
subject monitoring event. In this statistical evaluation, non-detects are assigned values equal to their
respective detection limits. This method of handling non-detects was used as part of the statistical
analyses completed as part of the baseline water quality monitoring evaluations as set forth in the
NCDEQ-SWS memo dated January 18, 1995.
5.2.2 Statistical Analyses
5.2.2.1 Descriptive Statistics
The descriptive statistics program calculates the pooled mean, background mean, pooled standard
deviation, background standard deviation, rank sum, rank mean, and variance for each constituent
detected in each well. The percentages of all sample analyses for which the concentrations are below the
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 29, 2016 6
quantitation limits (non-detects) are calculated by constituent for each well. The descriptive statistics are
included in Appendix III.
5.2.2.2 Time vs. Concentration Graphs
The graphs display plots of the concentrations of one parameter for a single well over time. The
concentration is plotted along the vertical axis and the sample dates are plotted along the horizontal axis.
The graphs were used to visually examine changes in concentration over time for a parameter at a given
well. Graphs were only prepared for parameters detected at a given well, during this monitoring event.
The graphs are contained in Appendix IV.
♦The time series plot antimony concentration at background well MW-16 illustrate consistent non-
detections of antimony prior to the promulgation of the lower NCDEQ-SWS, Solid Waste Section
Limits (SWSL) in 2006. With the lower SWSLs, estimated concentrations have been reported
infrequently. No consistent trends were recognized in the data sets.
♦The time series plots of barium concentrations at background wells and compliance wells
illustrate consistent non-detections of barium prior to the promulgation of the lower SWSLs. The
post 2006 data sets generally exhibits relatively stable concentrations.
♦The time series plot of beryllium concentrations at compliance well MW-19 illustrate consistent
non-detections of beryllium prior to the promulgation of the lower SWSL in 2006. With the lower
SWSLs, estimated concentrations have been reported infrequently. No consistent trends were
recognized in the data sets.
♦The time series plot of chromium concentrations at well MW-25d illustrate a high portion of non-
detections prior to the promulgation of the lower SWSLs. The majority of the detections were
estimated values. The post 2006 data set generally exhibits relatively stable concentrations.
♦Time series plots of cobalt concentrations at wells MW-18, MW-19, and MW-24 depict
fluctuations in concentrations coincide with the lower SWLS. The majority of the detections were
estimated values. No consistent trends over time were recognized in the data sets.
♦The time series plots of copper concentrations at compliance wells MW-19 and MW-24 illustrate
consistent non-detections of copper prior to the promulgation of the revised SWSL. The majority
of the detections were estimated values. The post 2006 data sets generally exhibits relatively
stable concentrations.
♦Time series plots of lead concentrations at wells MW-19 and MW-22 depict fluctuations in
concentrations coincide with the lower SWLS. The majority of the detections were estimated
values. No consistent trends over time were recognized in the data sets.
♦The time series plots of the concentrations of nickel at background well MW-16 and compliance
wells MW-19, MW-20, and MW-24 generally illustrate a high portion of non-detections of nickel
prior to the promulgation of the revised SWSL. The majority of the detections were estimated
values that exhibit an overall trend of relatively stable concentrations in the post 2006 data sets.
♦The time series plots of the concentrations of vanadium at background well MW-16 and
compliance wells MW-17, MW-18, MW-19, MW-20, and MW-25b illustrate no detections prior to
the revised SWSL. The detections of vanadium coincide with the promulgation of the revised
SWSL with the bulk of the detections estimated values. The post 2006 data sets generally depict
relatively stable concentrations.
♦The time series plots of the concentrations of zinc at compliance wells MW-19 and MW-24
illustrate no detections prior to the revised SWSL. The detections of zinc coincide with the
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 29, 2016 7
promulgation of the revised SWSL with the majority of the detections estimated values. The post
2006 data sets generally depict relatively stable concentrations.
5.2.2.3 Interwell Statistical Comparisons
Non-parametric Upper Tolerance Intervals were calculated from the background data set to determine if
any detected individual compliance parameter concentration represents a statistically significant increase
over the historic background concentrations. This test compares the current sampling event analytical
data for each compliance well to Upper Limits computed from the pooled background data set.
5.2.2.4 Non-Parametric Tolerance Limits Test
In order to analyze the laboratory analytical results for evidence of statistically significant increases (SSIs)
over background values, the data distribution of all of the detected monitored constituents was first
analyzed. Due to the large size of the pooled historical results database, the Shapiro-Francia Test of
Normality was utilized. This statistical test of data distribution can effectively determine if large data sets
are parametrically or non-parametrically distributed.
For all of the analyzed data sets, the data distribution tests indicated a non-parametric distribution likely
due to a relatively high percentage of non-detects in the analyzed database even at the 95% Confidence
Level. As a result, Non-Parametric Upper Limits Computations were employed in order to calculate the
appropriate Statistical Upper Limit for each of the detected monitored parameters. Non-parametric
Tolerance Limits were selected for use in calculation of the statistical Upper Limits. In order to determine
if any individual parameter concentration detected during this monitoring event represents a SSI over the
historic background concentrations, once the respective Upper Limit was obtained, the compliance data
were compared via an Inter-Well Comparison to the Statistical Upper Limit to determine if an SSI may
have occurred. The statistical analyses suggest that no SSIs occurred during this monitoring event. The
Non-Parametric Upper Tolerance Limits are included in Appendix V.
5.3 Hydraulic Conductivity
In-situ hydraulic conductivity tests were performed by G.N. Richardson and Associates, Inc. (GNRA) on
wells MW-16, MW-17, MW-18, MW-20, MW-21, MW-23, MW-25, during January 1998, with monitoring
wells MW-15, MW-19, MW-22, MW-24, and MW-25D tested during March 1998. The data from these
tests yielded hydraulic conductivity values ranging from 0.090 feet/day (in MW-24) to 3.269 feet/day (in
MW-18). A complete discussion of the test methods and calculations was presented in the “Baseline
Groundwater Monitoring Report, Phase III” prepared by G.N. Richardson and Associates, dated May 1998.
The data summarized in Table 5 was used to calculate groundwater flow velocities for compliance
network wells located at points around the perimeter of the monitored unit.
5.4 Groundwater Flow Direction and Rate
The static water levels in the Phase III monitoring wells were measured on October 5
th and 6
th 2015. The
depth to the water table ranged from 3.62 feet to 29.78 feet below the top of well casing. Groundwater
elevation, top of well casing elevations, and the monitored aquifer unit data for each well are presented in
Table 1. A groundwater contour map was constructed using the data collected during this event and is
presented as Figure 1. Based on the data collected, groundwater appears to be flowing north-northwest
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 29, 2016 8
beneath the west half of Phase III and generally to the north-northeast in the eastern half of Phase III. The
groundwater gradient at each well was calculated assuming a constant groundwater gradient along the
flow line between adjacent up-gradient groundwater elevation contour line and the monitoring well.
Based on a variation of Darcy’s Law, the rate of groundwater movement within the regolith aquifer was
calculated at each monitoring well using the following equation:
V = Ki ÷ n
Where V = velocity (feet/day)
K = hydraulic conductivity (feet/day)
i = groundwater gradient (feet/foot)
n =effective porosity (dimensionless)
Calculated hydraulic conductivity and gradient values and estimated effective porosity values for each well
were used in the velocity calculations. The 20 percent effective porosity value is based on porosity and
specific yield versus grain size distribution relationships presented in Fetter (1988), and is typical of the
types of soils (predominantly silts and sandy silts with some clays) comprising the regolith at the landfill.
The calculated groundwater velocities ranged from 0.007 feet/day at well MW-24 to 0.467 feet/day at well
MW-18 and are summarized in Table 5.
5.5 Surface Water
Table 6 provides a summary of the constituent concentrations reported above the method detection limit
(MDL) for the surface water samples collected. Concentrations reported between the MDL and the Solid
Waste Section Limits (SWSL) are considered estimated, thus shown as a “J” flagged concentration.Table
7 provides a summary of the reported concentrations which exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2B
Standard (2B Standard) criterion or action levels. The following summarizes the exceedances of the 2B
Standards. The complete laboratory analytical report is included in Appendix II.
♦Cobalt and copper were detected at concentrations greater than the corresponding 2B Standard
in the up-stream sample SW-1.
♦Silver was detected at a concentration greater than the corresponding 2B Standard in sample SW-
3.
Surface water sample location SW-1 is up-stream of the facility. Sample location SW-3 is down-stream of
Phase III with analytical results reporting no 2B Standard exceedance, other than silver at SW-3. First and
foremost, it is recognized that this “Freshwater Standard” may not be applicable to this segment of North
Buffalo Creek, with the presence of a municipal wastewater treatment plant immediately upstream. In
general, concentrations of the detected constituent concentrations were higher at up-stream sample
location SW-1. The detected concentration of silver at SW-3 is an estimated value which approximates
the method detection limit. When compared with the low 2B Freshwater Standard, any detection would
exceed the referenced standard. Nonetheless, silver was not detected in groundwater associated with
Phase I. In view of all these findings, the landfill including Phase III are not believed to be the source of
these constituents, or the cause for these exceedances of the 2B Standards.
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 29, 2016 9
5.6 Leachate Sample Analytical Results
On October 7, 2015, a sample of leachate was collected from the leachate wet well. The collected sample
was submitted for laboratory analyses for Appendix I constituents plus Nitrate, Sulfur, Sulfate, Phosphate,
Biological Oxygen Demand and Chemical Oxygen Demand.Table 8 provides a summary of the
associated analytical results.
5.7 Quality Assurance
A qualitative review of the data was performed to verify that the detected concentrations in the laboratory
report were of known quality. A formal, quantitative data validation was not performed. Laboratory-
assigned data qualifiers were evaluated to verify that rejected or unsupportable data were not included in
the dataset. Quality control data provided in the laboratory reports were also reviewed. No rejected or
otherwise unacceptable quality data were reported from the laboratory.
During this event a duplicate sample was collected from monitoring well MW-19 and submitted for
analysis as "Duplicate III." This sample was analyzed for Appendix I constituents. The detected
constituents and concentration reported for well MW-19 were similar to the concentrations reported in
the sample labeled "Duplicate III" suggesting a good correlation between the sample set analytical results.
Trip blank samples accompanied the sample bottles from the time they left the laboratory until they
returned. These samples were analyzed for Appendix I volatile organic and inorganic constituents. No
volatile organic or inorganic constituents were present in the trip blank samples at detectable levels.
Laboratory QC samples were analyzed for all constituents included in this sampling event. The results of
the duplicate, trip blank and laboratory QC sample analyses are included in Appendix II.
6.0 References
Fetter, C. W., 1988, Applied Hydrogeology, New York; Macmillan Publishing Company, 1988, 592 pp.
North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources,
Division of Environmental Management, Subchapter 2L, Classifications and Water Quality Standards
Applicable to the Groundwaters of North Carolina, Sections .0100, .0200, and .0300; from the
Environmental Management Commission Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources,
Division of Environmental Management, Subchapter 2B, Classifications and Water Quality Standards
Applicable to the Surface Waters of North Carolina, Section .0200; from the Environmental Management
Commission, Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources,
Division of Solid Waste Management, subchapter 13B, Solid Waste Management, Section .1600.
White Street Landfill - Phase III (Permit # 41-12)
Detection Monitoring Report
Greensboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1584-98-081C
January 29, 2016 10
7.0 Certification
I hereby certify this 29
th day of January 2016 that this report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision.
______________________________
Edmund Q.B. Henriques, L.G.
Senior Geologist / Project Manager
Technical support provided by:
______________________________
Amanda Bloom
Staff Professional
Tables
TABLE 1
WELL CONSTRUCTION AND GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA
PHASE 3 - PERMIT # 41-12
WHITE STREET LANDFILL
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
S&ME PROJECT NO. 1584-98-81C
Well ID
Date
Installed
Total
Depth
Well
Diameter
Depth to
Top of
Screen
Well Screen
Interval Geology of Screened Northing Easting
Ground
Elevation
Top of Casing
Elevation
Depth to
Groundwater1
Groundwater
Elevation
Interval NAD 83 NAD 83 NAVD 88 NAVD 88 4/13/2015 4/13/2015
(feet)(inches)(feet)(feet bgs)(feet msl.)(feet msl.)(feet)(feet msl.)
MW-15 11/18/1997 60.0 2 45.0 45 - 60 water table aquifer 1783971.29 857176.76 Not measured 794.81 29.78 765.03
MW-16 11/19/1997 28.5 2 13.5 13.5 - 28.5 water table aquifer 1785497.62 857278.58 Not measured 758.02 not measured not measured
MW-17 11/10/1997 31.5 2 21.5 21.5 - 31.5 water table aquifer 1785250.50 857781.89 Not measured 755.05 8.88 746.17
MW-18 12/10/1997 17.5 2 7.5 7.5 - 17.5 water table aquifer 1785289.10 858310.99 Not measured 742.70 8.99 733.71
MW-19 4/28/1998 35.0 2 20.0 20 - 35 water table aquifer 1785224.00 858805.30 Not measured 740.70 16.10 724.60
MW-20 11/21/1997 25.0 2 10.0 10 - 25 water table aquifer 1784508.67 858896.54 Not measured 748.87 14.31 734.56
MW-21 11/20/1997 18.5 2 4.5 4.5 - 18.5 water table aquifer 1784125.81 858871.51 Not measured 743.32 4.71 738.61
MW-22 2/19/1998 30.0 2 15.0 15 - 30 water table aquifer 1783634.95 858820.30 Not measured 744.43 8.45 735.98
MW-23 11/18/1997 33.5 2 18.5 18.5 - 33.5 water table aquifer 1783362.23 858516.99 Not measured 744.25 5.06 739.19
MW-24 11/12/1997 12.0 2 4.0 4 - 12 water table aquifer 1783438.34 857897.71 Not measured 752.52 3.62 748.90
MW-25 12/11/1997 17.0 2 7.0 7 - 17 water table aquifer 1785043.38 858973.32 Not measured 746.47 11.88 734.59
MW-25d 12/11/1997 32.0 2 27.0 27 - 32 upper bedrock aquifer 1785039.23 858973.68 Not measured 746.19 13.98 732.21
City of Greensboro provided the top of casing elevations and ground surface elevations
Well Construction details obtained from Well Construction Records reported by HDR, Inc.
feet bgs. = feet below ground surface
feet msl. = feet mean sea level
Depth to Groundwater
1 = below top of casing
T:\Projects\1998\ENV\081C White Street Landfill (2014)\2015 Compliance Monitoring\October 2015\Phase 3\Phase3_October_2015 tables (FINAL).xlsx
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD PARAMETERS
PHASE 3 - PERMIT # 41-12
WHITE STREET LANDFILL
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
S&ME PROJECT NO. 1584-98-81C
DATE WELL WELL
TOP OF
CASING DEPTH TO WATER ODOR PURGE PUMP WELL EVAC PURGED TEMP pH SPECIFIC ORP DO TURBIDITY
ID DEPTH ELEVATION WATER ELEVATION METHOD RATE VOLUME VOLUME DRY?CONDUCTANCE
(feet)(feet msl.)(feet)(feet)(mL/min)(gallons)(gallons)(yes/no)(deg C)(SU)(μs/cm)(mV-NHE)(mg/L)(NTU)
10/6/2015 MW-15 60.0 794.81 29.78 765.03 None Low Flow 100 4.9 3 No 16.84 6.93 0.318 -66 2.51 3.71
10/6/2015 MW-16 28.5 758.02 NM*NM*None Low Flow 100 4.9 3.5 No 19.48 5.82 0.186 142 3.09 5.91
10/6/2015 MW-17 31.5 755.05 8.88 746.17 None Low Flow 100 3.8 4 No 21.11 5.57 0.135 195 2.21 2.14
10/6/2015 MW-18 17.5 742.70 8.99 733.71 None Low Flow 100 1.8 4 No 18.92 5.75 0.129 170 2.63 5.77
10/5/2015 MW-19 35.0 740.70 16.10 724.60 None Low Flow 100 3.1 3.5 No 16.20 5.84 0.386 164 3.02 52.00
10/5/2015 MW-20 25.0 748.87 14.31 734.56 None Low Flow 100 1.7 3.5 No 18.29 6.25 0.330 163 1.69 1.09
10/5/2015 MW-21 18.5 743.32 4.71 738.61 None Low Flow 100 2.5 3.5 No 19.57 5.59 0.161 214 3.11 1.68
10/6/2015 MW-22 30.0 744.43 8.45 735.98 None Low Flow 100 3.5 6 No 17.20 5.88 0.288 46 1.15 6.59
10/6/2015 MW-23 33.5 744.25 5.06 739.19 None Low Flow 100 4.6 3.5 No 14.02 6.98 0.350 -19 2.26 1.08
10/6/2015 MW-24 12.0 752.52 3.62 748.90 None Low Flow 100 1.9 4 No 15.36 6.56 0.721 5 2.78 2.31
10/5/2015 MW-25 17.0 746.47 11.88 734.59 None Low Flow 100 1.3 0 Yes 17.20 5.60 0.101 196 7.39 2.65
10/5/2015 MW-25b 33.0 746.19 13.98 732.21 None Low Flow 100 3.1 3.5 No 16.83 5.86 0.101 175 6.06 0.71
Notes:
1. Field sampling performed by S&ME personnel.
2. TEMP = groundwater temperature, measured in degrees Celsius
3. Pump Rate, measured in milliliters/minute
4. Specific Conductance, measured in μs/cm indicates micro Siemens per centimeter.
5. SU indicates Standard Units.
6. NTU indicates Nephelometric Turbidity Units.
7. ORP = Oxidation Reduction Potential, mV-NHE indicates millivolts-Normal Hydrogen Electrode.
8. EVAC = evacuated volume of groundwater
9. DO = dissolved oxygen, measured in milligrams per liter
T:\Projects\1998\ENV\081C White Street Landfill (2014)\2015 Compliance Monitoring\October 2015\Phase 3\Phase3_October_2015 tables (FINAL).xlsx
MDL NC SWSL NCAC 2L NCDENR Federal
Well ID MW-15 MW-16 MW-17 MW-18 MW-19 MW-20 MW-21 MW-22 MW-23 MW-24 MW-25 MW-25b DuplicateIII Standard IMAC MCLs
Sample ID 4112-MW15 4112-MW16 4112-MW17 4112-MW18 4112-MW19 4112-MW20 4112-MW21 4112-MW22 4112-MW23 4112-MW24 4112-MW25 4112-MW26 4112-DuplicateIII
Date Collected 10/06/15 10/06/15 10/06/15 10/06/15 10/05/15 10/05/15 10/05/15 10/05/15 10/06/15 10/06/15 10/05/15 10/05/15 10/05/15
Detected Analytes (µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)
No VOC detected --------------------------
13 Antimony <0.220 2.25 J <0.220 <0.220 <0.220 <0.220 <0.220 <0.220 <0.220 <0.220 <0.220 <0.220 <0.220 0.220 6 ns 1 6
15 Barium 20.0 J 116 45.8 J 21.6 J 75.5 J 34.6 J 36.8 J 114 50.2 J 313 21.1 J 14.7 J 81.8 J 1.00 100 700 --2,000
23 Beryllium <0.100 <0.100 <0.100 <0.100 0.483 J <0.100 <0.100 <0.100 <0.100 <0.100 <0.100 <0.100 0.503 J 0.10 100 ns 4 ns
51 Chromium <1.40 <1.40 <1.40 <1.40 <1.40 <1.40 <1.40 <1.40 <1.40 <1.40 <1.40 1.61 J <1.40 1.40 10 10 --100
53 Cobalt <1.10 <1.10 <1.10 1.13 J 1.32 J <1.10 <1.10 <1.10 <1.10 4.09 J <1.10 <1.10 1.12 J 1.10 10 ns 1 ns
54 Copper <1.60 <1.60 <1.60 <1.60 2.74 J <1.60 <1.60 <1.60 <1.60 1.94 J <1.60 <1.60 3.45 J 1.60 10 1,000 --1,000
131 Lead <3.10 <3.10 <3.10 <3.10 7.88 J <3.10 <3.10 5.39 J <3.10 <3.10 <3.10 <3.10 8.83 J 3.10 25 15 --ns
152 Nickel <1.80 3.02 J <1.80 <1.80 3.60 J 3.25 J <1.80 <1.80 <1.80 2.92 J <1.80 <1.80 3.74 J 1.80 50 100 --ns
209 Vanadium <1.40 5.38 J 2.56 J 2.47 J 7.70 J 3.60 J <1.40 <1.40 <1.40 <1.40 <1.40 3.58 J 7.76 J 1.40 25 ns 0.3 ns
213 Zinc <3.80 <3.80 <3.80 <3.80 9.54 J <3.80 <3.80 <3.80 <3.80 6.68 J <3.80 <3.80 11.2 3.80 10 1,000 --5,000
µg/L =concentrations reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L)
< = concentrations is less than the method detection limit shown
shaded cells indicate parameter detected above the MDL
NC SWSL = North Carolina Solid Waste Section Limit
J = Concentration reported greater than the method detection limit but less than the SWSL, thus it is considered estimated
NCAC 2L Standards = 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2L .0200, GW Quality Standards for Class GA groundwater. Concentrations in BOLD exceed the corresponding 2L Standard
NCDENR IMAC = Interim Maximum Allowed Concentration, NCDENR
Federal MCL = Maximum Concentration Levels, USEPA
ns = no MCL listed, USEPA and/or no NCAC 2L standard Listed
na = not analyzed
Appendix I Volatile Organic Compounds
Solid
Waste
Section
ID #
Sample Locations
Appendix I Metals
S&ME PROJECT NO. 1584-98-81C
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALYSES RESULTS - DETECTIONS
PHASE 3 - PERMIT # 41-12
WHITE STREET LANDFILL
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
T:\Projects\1998\ENV\081C White Street Landfill (2014)\2015 Compliance Monitoring\October 2015\Phase 3\Phase3_October_2015 tables (FINAL).xlsx
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF 2L GROUNDWATER STANDARD EXCEEDANCES
PHASE 3 - PERMIT # 41-12
WHITE STREET LANDFILL
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
S&ME PROJECT NO. 1584-98-81C
NCAC 2L NCDENR Federal
Well ID MW-16 MW-17 MW-18 MW-19 MW-20 MW-24 MW-25b DuplicateIII Standards IMAC MCLs
Sample ID 4112-MW16 4112-MW17 4112-MW18 4112-MW19 4112-MW20 4112-MW24 4112-MW26 4112-DuplicateIII
Date Collected 10/06/15 10/06/15 10/06/15 10/05/15 10/05/15 10/06/15 10/05/15 10/05/15
Detected Analytes (ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)
----------------
13 Antimony 2.25 J <0.220 <0.220 <0.220 <0.220 <0.220 <0.220 <0.220 --1 6
53 Cobalt <1.10 <1.10 1.13 J 1.32 J <1.10 4.09 J <1.10 1.12 J --1 ns
209 Vanadium 5.38 J 2.56 J 2.47 J 7.70 J 3.60 J <1.40 3.58 J 7.76 J --0.3 ns
ug/L = concentrations reported in micrograms per liter (ug/L)
NC SWSL = North Carolina Solid Waste Section Limit
NCAC 2L Standards = 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2L .0200, GW Quality Standards for Class GA groundwater.
NCDENR IMAC = Interim Maximum Allowed Concentration, NCDENR
Concentration greater than the NCAC 2L Standards or NCDENR IMAC are shown in bold
Federal MCL = Maximum Concentration Levels, USEPA
ns = no MCL listed, USEPA and/or no NCAC 2L standard listed
Solid Waste
Section ID #
No 2L Standard Groundwater
Exceedances Detected
Appendix I Volatile Organic Compounds
Appendix I Metals
T:\Projects\1998\ENV\081C White Street Landfill (2014)\2015 Compliance Monitoring\October 2015\Phase 3\Phase3_October_2015 tables (FINAL).xlsx
Well No.Hydraulic Porosity Gradient Groundwater
Conductivity Velocity
(K = feet/day)(n = %)(I = feet/foot)(V= feet/day)
MW-15 0.265 0.20 0.017 0.023
MW-16 0.331 0.20 WO WO
MW-17 0.160 0.20 0.017 0.014
MW-18 3.269 0.20 0.029 0.467
MW-19 0.716 0.20 0.027 0.095
MW-20 1.336 0.20 0.019 0.130
MW-21 0.681 0.20 0.017 0.058
MW-22 0.325 0.20 0.018 0.029
MW-23 0.173 0.20 0.016 0.014
MW-24 0.090 0.20 0.016 0.007
MW-25 2.088 0.20 dry well dry well
MW-25D 0.827 0.20 NA NA
Notes: Hydraulic Conductivity's from slug test data: G.N. Richardson & Associates
Porosity values from published literature, based on soil types
Velocity calculated using V = KI/n
NA = Not Applicable, deeper aquifer monitoring well
WO = Well obstruction - no water level available for gradient calculation
S&ME PROJECT NO. 1584-98-081C
TABLE 5
GROUNDWATER VELOCITY DATA - OCTOBER 2015
WHITE STREET LANDFILL
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
PHASE 3 - PERMIT #41-12
T:\Projects\1998\ENV\081C White Street Landfill (2014)\2015 Compliance Monitoring\October 2015\Phase 3\Phase3_October_2015 tables (FINAL).xlsx
MDL NC SWSL NCAC 2B
Sample Location SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 Standards
Sample ID 4103-SW1 4103-SW2 4103-SW3
Date Collected 10/07/15 10/07/15 10/07/15
Detected Analytes
(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)
28 Bromodichloromethane <0.17 <0.17 0.96 J 0.17 3 ns
44 Chloroform <0.18 <0.18 2.4 J 0.18 5 5.6
13 Antimony 0.268 J <0.220 0.372 J 0.22 6 5.6
15 Barium 85.7 J 42.6 J 28.3 J 1.00 100 1000
34 Cadmium 0.784 J <0.360 <0.360 0.36 1 ns
51 Chromium 7.93 J <1.40 <1.40 1.4 10 50
53 Cobalt 4.34 J <1.10 2.43 J 1.1 10 3
54 Copper 11.30 <1.60 2.65 J 1.6 10 7
131 Lead 7.02 J <3.10 <3.10 3.1 10 25**
184 Silver <1.90 <1.90 2.74 J 1.9 10 0.06**
152 Nickel 3.16 J <1.80 6.56 J 1.8 50 25
209 Vanadium 18.2 J 2.91 J 3.69 J 25 25 ns
213 Zinc 117 7.88 J 25.2 3.80 10 50**
J = Concentration reported greater than the MDL but less than the SWSL, thus it is considered estimated
* = Title 15A NCAC 2B Standards for Class C, WS-V surface water
** = Freshwater Standard
µg/L =concentrations reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L)
< = concentrations is less than the method detection limit shown
NC SWSL = North Carolina Solid Waste Section Limit
TABLE 6
SUMMARY OF SURFACE WATER ANALYSES RESULTS - DETECTIONS
PHASE 3 - PERMIT # 41-12
WHITE STREET LANDFILL
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Solid Waste
Section
ID #
Sample Locations
Appendix I Volatile Organic Compounds
Appendix I Metals
S&ME PROJECT NO. 1584-98-81C
T:\Projects\1998\ENV\081C White Street Landfill (2014)\2015 Compliance Monitoring\October 2015\Phase 3\Phase3_October_2015 tables (FINAL).xlsx
TABLE 7
SUMMARY OF 2B SURFACE STANDARD EXCEEDANCES
PHASE 3 - PERMIT # 41-12
WHITE STREET LANDFILL
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
S&ME PROJECT NO. 1584-98-81C
Sample Locations NC SWSL NCAC 2B
Sample Location SW-1 SW-3 Standards*
Sample ID 4103-SW1 4103-SW3
Date Collected 10/07/15 10/07/15
Detected Analytes
(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)(µg/L)
53 Cobalt 4.34 J 2.43 J 10 3
54 Copper 11.30 2.65 J 10 7
184 Silver <1.90 2.74 J 10 0.06**
213 Zinc 117 25.2 10 50**
µg/L =concentrations reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L)
< =concentrations is less than the method detection limit shown
NC SWSL = North Carolina Solid Waste Section Limit
* = Title 15A NCAC 2B Standards for Class C, WS-V surface water
** = Freshwater Standard
(AL) = Action Level
J =Concentration reported is greater than the MDL but is less than the SWSL, thus it is considered estimated
Concentrations in bold print exceed either the NCAC 2B Standard or Action Level
Solid Waste
Section ID #
Appendix I Metals
Sample ID = Leachate Sample Collected 10/7/15
Parameter SWS ID Units Result MDL SWSL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 71 µg/L 6.3 JD 1.9 10
2-Butanone 141 µg/L 330 13 100
Acetone 3 µg/L 600 D 12 100
Antimony 13 µg/L 5.67 JD 2.20 6
Arsenic 14 µg/L 7.50 J 6.80 10
Barium 15 µg/L 558 1.00 100
Chromium 51 µg/L 14.9 1.40 10
Cobalt 53 µg/L 20.5 1.10 10
Copper 54 µg/L 16.3 1.60 10
Nickel 152 µg/L 135 1.80 50
Vanadium 209 µg/L 20.0 1.40 25
Zinc 213 µg/L 59.6 3.80 10
Sulfate 315 mg/L 80 D 2.9 250
Phosphorous none µg/L 0.32 0.050 NE
pH 321 s.u.7.2 1.0 NE
BOD 316 mg/L 23 2.0 NE
COD 317 mg/L 460 40 NE
J = Analyte detected; value is between the Method Detection Limit (MDL) and PQL
NE = Not Established
D = Analyte Value Determined with sample dilution
B = The analyte was detected in the associated method blank.
NC SWSL = North Carolina Solid Waste Section Limit
MDL = Method Detection Limit
Target compounds not detected are not listed
Miscellaneous Parameters
Appendix I Metals
Appendix I Volatile Organic Compounds
S&ME PROJECT NO. 1584-98-081C
TABLE 8
SUMMARY OF LEACHATE SAMPLE ANALYSES
PHASE 3 - PERMIT # 41-12
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
T:\Projects\1998\ENV\081C White Street Landfill (2014)\2015 Compliance Monitoring\October 2015\Phase 3\Phase3_October_2015 tables (FINAL).xlsx
Figures
GR
O
U
N
D
W
A
T
E
R

F
L
O
W

M
A
P
WH
I
T
E

S
T
R
E
E
T

L
A
N
D
F
I
L
L
GR
E
E
N
S
B
O
R
O
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
AS

S
H
O
W
N
RD
M
EQ
B
H
15
8
4
-
9
8
-
0
8
1
C
DE
C
E
M
B
E
R

2
0
1
5
1
PH
A
S
E

I
I
I

(724.60)
(733.71)
(746.17)
(NOT SAMPLED)
(765.03)
(739.19)
(735.98)
(738.61)
(734.56)
(748.90)
(746.17)
PHASE III
(732.21)(732.21)(732.21)
(734.59)
STREAM SAMPLE LOCATION
WHITE STREET LANDFILL
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
AS SHOWN DSB/RDM LE
1584-98-081 NOVEMBER 2007 2
PHASE III
0
8
0
0
4
0
0
8
0
0
S
C
A
L
E
:

1
"

=

8
0
0
'
LEGENDSTREAM SAMPLE LOCATION
Appendix I – Field Sampling Data Sheets
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
30.22 feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 1015 Stop 1105
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3 sec.Start 1105 Stop 1115
Off: 27 sec.
Pressure: 40 psi
2" well:
height:30.22 x .163 =4.92586
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
1020 10/6/2015 18.45 6.78 0.311 -5 4.89 5.12 30.54
1025 10/6/2015 17.87 6.95 0.341 -24 4.32 5.00 30.81
1030 10/6/2015 17.25 6.93 0.336 -34 4.12 4.75 31.08
1035 10/6/2015 16.86 9.92 0.332 -42 3.79 4.35 31.36
1040 10/6/2015 16.84 6.93 0.329 -50 3.54 4.78 31.69
1045 10/6/2015 16.84 6.93 0.325 -55 3.09 4.40 32.01
1050 10/6/2015 16.86 6.94 0.321 -58 2.54 4.15 32.30
1055 10/6/2015 16.85 6.95 0.319 -61 2.49 3.56 32.59
1100 10/6/2015 16.84 6.95 0.318 -64 2.54 3.66 32.92
1105 10/6/2015 16.84 6.93 0.318 -66 2.51 3.71 33.32
Final Readings 1105 10/6/2015 16.84 6.93 0.318 -66 2.51 3.71 33.32
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
Sample Collection Time
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 3.0
100
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:60.00
Height of water column:
Bladder Pump
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Bladder Pump Purge Time
Bradley Keyse
Depth to water from measuring point:29.78
1115
Sunny
60 *F
Water Level & Well Data
Tuesday, October 06, 2015
Tuesday, October 06, 2015
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-MW15
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:6-Oct x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
30.00 feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 1220 Stop 1255
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3.0 sec.Start 1255 Stop 1305
Off: 27.0 sec.
Pressure:psi
2" well:
height:30 x .163 =4.89
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
1225 10/6/2015 19.13 5.88 0.192 127 3.00 5.23
1230 10/6/2015 19.17 5.87 0.191 130 2.97 7.17 Note: Water level meter was obstructed by an unknown object in the well.
1235 10/6/2015 19.21 5.86 0.190 133 2.92 6.24
1240 10/6/2015 19.25 5.86 0.189 136 2.98 5.78
1245 10/6/2015 19.30 5.85 0.189 138 3.09 6.06
1250 10/6/2015 19.35 5.84 0.188 140 3.01 5.41
1255 10/6/2015 19.48 5.82 0.186 142 3.09 5.91
Final Readings 1255 10/6/2015 19.48 5.82 0.186 142 3.09 5.91
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
Tuesday, October 06, 2015
Tuesday, October 06, 2015
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-MW16
Bladder Pump Purge Time
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Water Level & Well Data
Depth to water from measuring point:
1305
Height of water column:
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Sunny
70 *F70
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:30.00
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 3.5
Bladder Pump
100 Sample Collection Time
Was well purged dry
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 1345 Stop 1420
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3.0 sec.Start 1420 Stop 1430
Off: 27.0 sec.
Pressure: 20 psi
2" well:
height:23.12 x .163 =3.76856
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
1350 10/6/2015 20.04 5.66 0.135 187 3.27 3.44 9.92
1355 10/6/2015 20.51 5.66 0.136 190 2.30 4.96 10.10
1400 10/6/2015 20.77 5.69 0.136 190 2.22 2.51 10.24
1405 10/6/2015 20.91 5.69 0.136 191 2.26 2.39 10.25
1410 10/6/2015 21.00 5.68 0.136 192 2.09 2.28 10.35
1415 10/6/2015 21.07 5.66 0.135 194 2.18 2.03 10.47
1420 10/6/2015 21.11 5.57 0.135 195 2.21 2.14 10.56
Final Readings 1420 10/6/2015 21.11 5.57 0.135 195 2.21 2.14 10.56
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
100 Sample Collection Time
Bladder Pump
Height of water column:23.12
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 4.0
1430
Sunny
71 *F
Water Level & Well Data
Bradley Keyse
Depth to water from measuring point:8.88
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Bladder Pump Purge Time
32.00
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-MW17
Tuesday, October 06, 2015
Tuesday, October 06, 2015
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 1450 Stop 1535
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3.0 sec.Start 1535 Stop 1545
Off: 27.0 sec.
Pressure: 18 psi
2" well:
height:11.01 x .163 =1.79463
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
1455 10/6/2015 18.64 6.08 0.173 97 4.18 10.59 9.29
1500 10/6/2015 18.64 6.07 0.172 100 2.78 10.44 9.36
1505 10/6/2015 18.65 5.92 0.151 126 2.15 8.77 9.36
1510 10/6/2015 18.71 5.87 0.143 135 2.22 7.65 9.38
1515 10/6/2015 18.98 5.81 0.136 153 2.26 6.71 9.35
1520 10/6/2015 19.10 5.79 0.134 159 2.26 6.47 9.35
1525 10/6/2015 19.11 5.77 0.131 165 2.35 5.70 9.35
1530 10/6/2015 18.93 5.76 0.129 168 2.59 6.08 9.35
1535 10/6/2015 18.92 5.75 0.129 170 2.63 5.77 9.35
Final Readings 1535 10/6/2015 18.92 5.75 0.129 170 2.63 5.77 9.35
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Water Level & Well Data
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-MW18
Tuesday, October 06, 2015
Bradley Keyse
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:20.00
Height of water column:
Tuesday, October 06, 2015
Depth to water from measuring point:8.99
1545
Sunny
71
11.01
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Was well purged dry
Bladder Pump Purge Time
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Field Analyses
Bladder Pump
100 Sample Collection Time
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 4.0
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
Water Level & Well Data
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 1120 Stop 1225
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3.0 sec.Start 1225 Stop 1235
Off: 27.0 sec.
Pressure: 25 psi
Note: Duplicate III taken at this location. (0900 hrs)
2" well:
height:18.90 x .163 =3.0807
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
1125 10/5/2015 15.81 5.75 0.352 94 11.42 40.30 16.31
1130 10/5/2015 15.58 5.68 0.378 118 8.24 64.40 16.32
1135 10/5/2015 15.62 5.73 0.388 137 6.81 66.20 16.35
1140 10/5/2015 15.71 5.78 0.387 148 6.08 57.40 16.36
1145 10/5/2015 15.71 5.79 0.386 153 6.20 57.90 16.37
1150 10/5/2015 15.75 5.79 0.387 157 6.18 59.00 16.37
1155 10/5/2015 15.78 5.81 0.386 158 4.42 60.90 16.37
1200 10/5/2015 15.8 5.82 0.385 159 4.40 65.00 16.36
1205 10/5/2015 15.89 5.81 0.387 160 3.58 58.00
1210 10/5/2015 16.10 5.81 0.389 163 2.88 50.00
1215 10/5/2015 16.17 5.80 0.388 164 3.10 53.00
1220 10/5/2015 16.17 5.84 0.388 164 3.05 54.00
1225 10/5/2015 16.20 5.84 0.386 164 3.02 52.00
Final Readings 1225 10/5/2015 16.20 5.84 0.386 164 3.02 52.00 13.91
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
Sample Collection Time100
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 3.5
Bladder Pump
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Bladder Pump Purge Time
18.90
Bradley Keyse
Monday, October 05, 2015
Monday, October 05, 2015
Height of water column:
53
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:35.00
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-MW19
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Depth to water from measuring point:16.10
1235
Cloudy
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 1450 Stop 1520
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3.0 sec.Start 1520 Stop 1530
Off: 27.0 sec.
Pressure: 18 psi
2" well:
height:10.69 x .163 =1.74247
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
1455 10/5/2015 18.28 6.31 0.394 193 4.10 1.26 14.58
1500 10/5/2015 18.18 6.30 0.380 188 2.83 1.14 14.61
1505 10/5/2015 18.23 6.28 0.358 178 2.10 1.00 14.61
1510 10/5/2015 18.40 6.20 0.347 171 1.77 0.96 14.62
1515 10/5/2015 18.37 6.27 0.338 166 1.66 0.99 14.61
1520 10/5/2015 18.29 6.25 0.330 163 1.69 1.09 14.61
Final Readings 1520 10/5/2015 18.29 6.25 0.330 163 1.69 1.09 14.61
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
100 Sample Collection Time
Bladder Pump
Height of water column:10.69
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 3.5
1530
Cloudy
65 *F
Water Level & Well Data
Bradley Keyse
Depth to water from measuring point:14.31
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Bladder Pump Purge Time
25.00
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-MW20
Monday, October 05, 2015
Monday, October 05, 2015
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 1550 Stop 1625
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3.0 sec.Start 1625 Stop 1635
Off: 27.0 sec.
Pressure: 20 psi
2" well:
height:15.29 x .163 =2.49227
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
1555 10/5/2015 18.78 5.81 0.176 192 5.17 1.78 5.14
1600 10/5/2015 18.98 5.70 0.168 196 4.01 1.68 5.15
1605 10/5/2015 19.31 5.67 0.165 200 3.82 1.44 5.13
1610 10/5/2015 19.62 5.65 0.163 205 3.58 1.32 5.12
1615 10/5/2015 19.57 5.63 0.162 208 3.54 1.90 5.13
1620 10/5/2015 19.54 5.61 0.161 211 3.14 1.56 5.13
1625 10/5/2015 19.57 5.59 0.161 214 3.11 1.68 5.13
Final Readings 1625 10/5/2015 19.57 5.59 0.161 214 3.11 1.68 5.13
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
100 Sample Collection Time
Bladder Pump
Height of water column:15.29
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 3.5
1635
Cloudy
65 *F
Water Level & Well Data
Bradley Keyse
Depth to water from measuring point:4.71
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Bladder Pump Purge Time
20.00
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-MW21
Monday, October 05, 2015
Monday, October 05, 2015
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 1700 Stop 1810
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 2.5 sec.Start 1810 Stop 1820
Off: 27.0 sec.
Pressure: 20 psi
2" well:
height:21.55 x .163 =3.51265
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
1705 10/5/2015 17.88 6.11 0.355 28 3.37 12.90 9.33
1710 10/5/2015 17.68 6.13 0.364 14 2.17 22.60 9.63
1715 10/5/2015 17.61 6.14 0.364 9 1.60 29.80 10.04
1720 10/5/2015 17.68 6.15 0.362 11 1.60 27.60 10.24
1725 10/5/2015 17.63 6.13 0.357 14 1.53 23.80 10.53
1730 10/5/2015 17.60 6.12 0.353 16 1.61 22.60 10.82
1735 10/5/2015 17.65 6.11 0.348 18 1.41 19.70 11.07
1740 10/5/2015 17.64 6.10 0.342 22 1.36 14.90 11.33
1745 10/5/2015 17.53 6.05 0.331 27 1.34 11.60 11.68
1750 10/5/2015 17.49 6.01 0.324 31 1.35 10.00 11.91
1755 10/5/2015 17.43 5.99 0.312 35 1.35 9.40 12.19
1800 10/5/2015 17.27 5.94 0.300 40 1.20 7.80 12.43
1805 10/5/2015 17.22 5.89 0.295 44 1.20 7.15 12.68
1810 10/5/2015 17.20 5.88 0.288 46 1.15 6.59 12.97
Final Readings 1810 10/5/2015 17.20 5.88 0.288 46 1.15 6.59 12.97
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Water Level & Well Data
Depth to water from measuring point:8.45
1820
Cloudy
55 *F
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-MW22
Bradley Keyse
Monday, October 05, 2015
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:30.00
Monday, October 05, 2015
Height of water column:21.55
Blader Pump
100
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Blader Pump Purge Time
Sample Collection Time
0.45
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 6.0
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 745 Stop 825
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 2.5 sec.Start 825 Stop 835
Off: 26.5 sec.
Pressure: 25 psi
2" well:
height:27.94 x .163 =4.55422
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
750 10/6/2015 13.41 6.70 0.328 -2 4.93 2.74
755 10/6/2015 13.60 6.78 0.335 -11 3.54 1.89
800 10/6/2015 13.68 6.85 0.340 -18 2.92 1.34
805 10/6/2015 13.76 6.73 0.343 -21 2.58 1.05
810 10/6/2015 13.82 6.78 0.344 -20 2.42 1.30
815 10/6/2015 13.88 6.89 0.346 -19 2.19 0.82
820 10/6/2015 13.98 6.95 0.348 -18 2.14 1.01
825 10/6/2015 14.02 6.98 0.350 -19 2.26 1.08
Final Readings 825 10/6/2015 14.02 6.98 0.350 -19 2.26 1.08 14.87
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
100 Sample Collection Time
Blader Pump
Height of water column:27.94
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 3.5
835
Clear/Cool
52 *F
Water Level & Well Data
Bradley Keyse
Depth to water from measuring point:5.06
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Blader Pump Purge Time
33.00
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-MW23
Tuesday, October 06, 2015
Tuesday, October 06, 2015
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:No:x Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 900 Stop 940
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 2.0 sec.Start 940 Stop 950
Off: 28.0 sec.
Pressure: 15 psi
2" well:
height:11.38 x .163 =1.85494
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
905 10/6/2015 15.22 6.54 0.679 -14 3.66 1.72 4.91
910 4/13/2015 15.16 6.52 0.705 -11 2.68 1.80 5.39
915 10/6/2015 15.12 6.53 0.710 -8 2.62 2.13 5.61
920 10/6/2015 15.25 6.56 0.716 -3 2.69 2.25 6.05
925 10/6/2015 15.28 6.57 0.718 1 2.80 2.31 6.29
930 10/6/2015 15.38 6.57 0.720 3 2.79 2.40 6.52
935 10/6/2015 15.54 6.57 0.723 4 2.84 2.29 6.71
940 10/6/2015 15.36 6.56 0.721 5 2.78 2.31 6.90
Final Readings 940 10/6/2015 15.36 6.56 0.721 5 2.78 2.31 6.90
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
100
Blader Pump Purge Time
Measuring point:
Sample Collection Time
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Height of water column:11.38
Blader Pump
Top of Casing
15.00
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Water Level & Well Data
Depth to water from measuring point:3.62
950
55 *F
White Street Landfill Tuesday, October 06, 2015
Tuesday, October 06, 2015
1584-98-081
4112-MW24
Bradley Keyse
Clear
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 4.0
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 1350 Stop 1405
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3.0 sec.Start 1405 Stop 1415
Off: 27.0 sec.
Pressure: 15 psi
2" well:
height:7.92 x .163 =1.29096
gallons liters x
Yes x No
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
1355 10/5/2015 17.32 5.64 0.101 192 7.44 2.99 12.34
1400 10/5/2015 17.32 5.61 0.101 191 7.16 2.62 12.34
1405 10/5/2015 17.20 5.60 0.101 196 7.39 2.65 12.41
Final Readings 1405 10/5/2015 17.20 5.60 0.101 196 7.39 2.65 12.41
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
80 Sample Collection Time
Bladder Pump
Height of water column:7.92
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 0.0
1415
Cloudy
55 * F
Water Level & Well Data
Bradley Keyse
Depth to water from measuring point:11.88
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Bladder Pump Purge Time
19.80
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-MW25
Monday, October 05, 2015
Monday, October 05, 2015
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start 1255 Stop 1335
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On: 3.0 sec.Start 1335 Stop 1345
Off: 27.0 sec.
Pressure: 28 psi
2" well:
height:19.07 x .163 =3.10841
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
1300 10/5/15 16.27 5.62 0.152 175 6.42 12.10 14.25
1305 10/5/15 16.17 5.68 0.138 175 6.49 8.95 14.23
1310 10/5/15 16.15 5.72 0.126 174 6.57 6.65 14.23
1315 10/5/15 16.13 5.79 0.113 173 6.47 3.45 14.23
1320 10/5/15 16.28 5.80 0.105 174 6.52 1.99 14.23
1325 10/5/15 16.53 5.82 0.102 175 6.43 1.33 14.23
1330 10/5/15 16.78 5.85 0.101 174 6.15 0.86 14.23
1335 10/5/15 16.83 5.86 0.101 175 6.06 0.71 14.23
Final Readings 1335 10/5/15 16.83 5.86 0.101 175 6.06 0.71 14.23
* C units mS/cm mV mg/L NTU
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Water Level & Well Data
Depth to water from measuring point:13.93
1345
Cloudy
55 *F
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
Bradley Keyse
Monday, October 05, 2015
Height of water column:19.07
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:33.00
Monday, October 05, 20154112-MW25b
Sample Collection Time
Bladder Pump
100
Measuring point:Top of Casing
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Bladder Pump Purge Time
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed 3.5
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
0.00 feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start Stop
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On:sec.Start Stop
Off:sec.
Pressure:psi
2" well:
height:0 x .163 =0
gallons liters
Yes No
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
Final Readings 1400 10/7/2015 18.76 7.27 0.229
* C units mS/cm
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Water Level & Well Data
Depth to water from measuring point:
1400
1584-98-081
White Street Landfill
4112-SW1
Gary Simcox
Sunny
65 *F
Summit Avenue Bridge
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed
Was well purged dry
Measuring point:
Wednesday, October 07, 2015
Wednesday, October 07, 2015
Height of water column:
Sample Collection Time
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Purge Time
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:x No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
0.00 feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start Stop
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On:sec.Start Stop
Off:sec.
Pressure:psi
2" well:
height:0 x .163 =0
gallons liters x
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
Final Readings 1320 10/7/2015 17.11 7.37 0.151
* C units mS/cm
Sample Collection Time
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Water Level & Well Data
Depth to water from measuring point:
1320
Sunny
65 *FGary Simcox
Height of water column:
Measuring point:
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Purge Time
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
Wednesday, October 07, 2015
Wednesday, October 07, 2015
White Street Landfill
1584-98-081
4112-SW2
White Street and Nealtown Road
Location:Purge Date:
Project No.:Purge Time:
Source Well:Sample Date:
Sample Time:
Locked?:Yes:No:Weather:
Sampled By:Air Temp:
feet
feet
feet
Purge Method
Sample Method Start Stop
Purge Rate ml/min
Control Settings On:sec.Start Stop
Off:sec.
Pressure:psi
2" well:
height:0 x .163 =0
gallons liters
Yes No x
*Stabilization Parameters
Time Date Temp pH Conductivity *ORP *D.O.*Turbidity DTW
Final Readings 154 10/7/2015 21.82 7.34 0.337
* C units mS/cm
Depth to well bottom from measuring point:
Purge Time
Measuring point:
Sample Collection Time
Well Purging & Sample Collection
Height of water column:0.00
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Water Level & Well Data
Depth to water from measuring point:
1545
65 *F
White Street Landfill Wednesday, October 07, 2015
Wednesday, October 07, 2015
1584-98-081
4112-SW3
Gary Simcox
Sunny
Waste Water Treatment Plant
Was well purged dry
Field Analyses
Volume of water in well
Volume of water removed
Appendix II – Laboratory Analytical Report
Appendix III – Descriptive Statistics
Appendix IV – Time vs. Concentration Graphs
Appendix V – Non-Parametric Upper Tolerance Limit
Computations
Appendix VI – NCDEQ EDDS (CD only)