20028_Alcatel Facility_Phase II GW Assessment 1994

'.
1
1
1,
1
'.,''::1
1
1
1
I
I",Ii,
•
I
I
'I'I',
I
•
Phase II Ground Water Assessment Report
Keebler Company Facility
Raleigh,North Carolina
October 18,1994
Prepared For
Keebler Company
Elmhurst,Illinois
Prepared By
Aquaterra,Inc.
Raleigh,North Carolina
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
410791fTVT/pjc
Sincerely,
CQflPQ(~A,'f~I-fI::AOQUARTERS:
?OSl OFFICE Box 37579 •RALEIG:H,NC.i06?7.7579.(9HI)859-9987 •fAx [phone]
Mr.Howard Hsu,Environmental Compliance Manager
Keebler Company
545 Lamont Road
Elmhurst,Illinois 60126
Reference:Phase II Ground Water Assessment Report
Keebler Company
Raleigh,North Carolina
Aquaterra Job No.4107601
Dear Mr.Hsu:
Aquaterra has completed the attached Phase II Ground Water Assessment Report for the
work conducted at the vacant Keebler facility in Raleigh,North Carolina.The Phase II
activities have been successful in continuing the definition of the ground water contaminant
plume beneath the central portion of the site.This report describes the scope of work and
field methods,provides analytical results,conclusions,and recommendations.
As previously mentioned,if Alcatel's progress at the site is less than desirable,Aquaterra
would be pleased to assist Keebler in continuing the assessment activities.
Aquaterra appreciates continuing to assist Keebler in finalizing their negotiations with
Alcatel and the property buyer.If you have any questions or comments concerning this
report,please call me at [phone].
A ATERRA,INC.
l~~
Thomas V.Taylor,P.G.
Project Manager
SrJ}~u~~L.Duncklee,P.G.
Branch Manager
October 18,1994
A\,~aQUaTerra
AGFi!EATL.,AKE;SCHEIYlICAL CORPORATIONCOMPANY
1
I
I
1
I
I,,
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
1
I
I
1 Introduction
Page 10f7
Phase II Ground Water Assessment Report
Keebler Company Facility
Raleigh,North CarOlina
October 18,1994
2 Objectives and Scope ofWork
The objective of the Phase II ground water assessment was to further delineate the
horizontal and vertical extent of ground water impact on the Keebler property in
accordance with DEM guidelines.
July 29,1994,Phase II Environmental Site Assessment prepared for
Tri Properties,Inc.
August 2,1994,Addendum to Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
prepared for Tri Properties,Inc.
September 27,1994,Ground Water Assessment Report prepared for
Keebler Company
•
•
•
Based on the above information,Keebler authorized Aquateua to COmmence with
additional (i.e.,Phase II)ground water assessment activities to further determine the
extent of ground water impact as presented in this report.For more detailed
information regarding previous assessment activities,please reference the following
reports prepared by Aquateua:
The Keebler Company (Keebler)retained Aquateua,Inc.,(Aquaterra)to conduct
Phase II ground water assessment activities at the vacant Keebler facility at
2900 Wake Forest Road in Raleigh,North Carolina (see Figure 1).Aquateua had
previously conducted a Phase II environmental site assessment (ESA)for a potential
buyer of the property and a Phase I ground water assessment for Keebler at the site.
The Phase II ESA included the installation and sampling of four temporary
monitoring wells at locations of potential ground water impact from both on-sIte and
off-site sources.The analytical results from two of these wells located along the
north property boundary of Keebler,adjacent to Alcatel Network Systems (Alcatel),
indicated impact from several volatile organic compounds (VOCs)at concentrations
exceeding North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standards under Title 15A NCAC
02L .0202 (g)(2L Standards).
The results of the Phase II ESA prompted Keebler to conduct Phase I ground water
assessment activities by installing six permanent ground water monitoring wells to
determine the source and extent of the VOC impacted ground water identified along
the northeastern property boundary.The analytical results from these wells
indicated VOC impact apparently limited to the northeastern-central portion of the
Keebler property extending downward into fractured bedrock.The most likely
source of the ground water contamination appears to originate on the Alcatel
property located to the northeast of Keebler,based primarily on the shallOW ground
water flow direction and documented ground water impact of chlorinated solvents at
Alcatel.
,
1,
I
J,
I
-.'.'
'I
1
~
I
I,
1
•,
I
I
I
Keebler Company
41D791
October 18,1994
The scope of work included the following tasks:
•Install two shallow and three intermediate ground water monitoring
wells (i.e.,EPA type II wells)to further assess the horizontal extent of
ground water impact in the unconsolidated and top of fractured
bedrock water bearing units.
•Install one deep monitoring well (i.e.,EPA type III well)to assess the
vertical extent ofimpacted ground water near existing wells MW-2 and
MW·2i.
•Develop and sample the wells for analysis of purgeable halocarbons,
and total chromium,copper,lead,and nickel.
•Survey the measuring point at the top of the well casings for
referencing water level measurements and determine ground water
flow directions and gradients.
•Prepare a Phase II Ground Water Assessment Report for submittal to
Keebler that describes field methods,provides analytical results,
conclusions,and recommendations.
3 Field Activities
1
I
I,
I
I
I,,
I•.·."
3.1 Monitoring Well Installation
3-1.1 Shallow and lntennediate Wells
Two shallow (MW-6s and MW-7s)and three intermediate ground water monitoring
wells (MW-1i,MW-6i,and MW-7i)were installed on-site from September 26 to
October 3,1994,to further delineate the horizontal extent of ground water impact in
the unconsolidated (shallow wells)and top of competent fractured bedrock
(intermediate wells)hydrogeologic units (see Figure 2).Wells MW-6s and MW-6i
were installed withm the warehouse portion of the building and wells MW-7s and
MW-7i were installed within the old snack plant portion of the building.Well MW-li
was paired with existing well MW-1s near the north corner of the Keebler property.
The wells were installed under the direct supervision of an Aquaterra geologist.
It should be noted that the five original shallow wells installed during the Phase I
ground water assessment,designated as MW-1 through MW-S,have been
redesignated as MW-Is through MW-Ss.The suffix "s"indicates a shallow well where
the well screen intersects the water table.The wells designated with the suffix "i"
indicate an intermediate well where the well screen is located entirely within the top
of competent fractured bedrock.These wells mayor may not be constructed with a
surface casing (i.e.,EPA type III well).The well designated with the suffix "d"
indicates a deep well where the well screen is installed within competent bedrock
well below the soil/bedrock interface.This well will be constructed with a surface
casing (see Section 3.1.2).
Page 2 of7
I-..'.I
1
I
••••
!,:'.
I
I
Keebler Company
410791
October 18,1994
Access for the four wells located inside the plant was provided by coring a lO-inch
hole through the concrete floor slab at each well location.The borings for the
shallow and intermediate monitoring wells were drilled with either a CME-75,
Mobile B-53 ATV,or a CME-45 ATV drilling rig using 4.25-inch inside diameter
hollow-stem augers to the boring termination depths (shallow wells)or auger refusal
(intermediate wells).The borings for the intermedIate wells were advanced into
competent bedrock with a 4-inch diameter air-hammer to the desired depth using the
augers or steel threaded pipe as temporary casing to keep the hole from collapsing.
Well MW-7i was advanced into rock with a 4-inch diameter core barrel due to
difficulties with the air-hammer.
Soil samples were not collected with a split-spoon sampler due to vertical space
constraints inside the building or the well was paired with an existing well where split-
spoon samples were already collected.Field classification of auger cuttings was
performed by the geologist or technician according to the Unified Soil Classification
System (ASTM D 2488-84).Soil boring and well construction information are
recorded on the Boring/Well Construction Lo~s,Well Construction Schematic,and
DEM Well Construction Records (Form GW-l)in Appendix A.
The shallow and intermediate wells were constructed of 2-inch diameter PVC casing
with lO-foot length,O.OlD-inch slot,PVC screen in the shallow wells and either 5 or
15-foot length,O.OlD-inch slot,PVC screen in the intermediate wells as described in
the standard procedures in Appendix B.A sand pack was not installed around the
screens of the intermediate wells due to annular space restrictions.Instead,a well
screen sock was slipped over the screen interval and time release bentonite pellets
were placed inside the top of the sock,just above the screen,and secured with
stainless steel hose clamps above and below the bentonite.The well screen and
bentonite was then installed in the boring and the bentonite was allowed to set up
over night.On the following morning,the integrity of the bentonite seal was checked
by tugging slightly on the well.Additional time release bentonite was then added
from the surface to ensure a competent seal.The seal was then checked again by
pumping water from the well WIth a 2-inch,low flow,submersible pump while
measuring the water level in the annular space outside the well.
The bottom of the well screens for the shallow wells (MW-6s and MW-7s)were
positioned at a depth of 23 feet below grade to intersect the water table measured at
approximately 15 to 17 feet below grade.The intermediate well screens were
installed to 42.5 (MW-li)to 73 (MW-7i)feet below grade.Each wellhead was fitted
with a water-tight lockable cap and a flush-mount steel manhole type cover.
Cuttings generated during all drilling activities were placed in labeled 55-gallon
drums and left on-site for future characterization and possible disposal.
3.1.2 Deep Well
As of this writing,the construction of deep well MW-2d has not been completed.
This well will be installed in the vicinity ofwells MW-2s and MW-li to determme the
vertical extent of VOC impacted ground water on the northeastern portion of the
site (see Figure 2).
Page 3 of7
I
1
J
;1•''.
1
I
I
I,
1
I
I,
I
1
I
!I
I
Keebler Company
410791
October 18,1994
During October 1 through 6,1994,The boring for well MW-2d was advanced with a 7
7/8-inch tricone roller bit using air to the top of competent bedrock.Due to
collapsing of the borehole in the unconsolidated material,a 6-inch diameter PVC
surface casing was installed to 28.5 feet below grade and was tremie grouted in-place.
Once the grout set,the hole was advanced to 80 feet with a 5 7/8-inch air hammer
through competent gneissic bedrock with zones of extremely hard quartz-rich layers.
A 4-inch diameter PVC surface casing was installed in the hole to 80 feet and was
tremie grouted in-place to prevent a carrying down of contaminants from the shallow
zone to deeper zones during subsequent drilling.Once the grout set,the hole was
advanced WIth a 4-inch diameter air hammer while looking for potential water
bearing fracture zones.No apparent water bearing zones were encountered to a
depth of 150 feet below grade.Therefore,the boring was terminated at 150 feet in
very competent gneiss with no apparent fractures.
After approximately 48 hours of completion,the boring was determined to be dry
with an electric water level probe.Construction of well MW-2d will commence
following removal of drilling tools that the subcontractor is having difficulty in
removing from the borehole.Well construction information and analytical results
from the sampling of the well,if water is present,will be included in an addendum to
this report.
3.2 Ground Water SamplingActivities
Following well development activities with either a disposable Teflon bailer or a
decontaminated low-flow 2-inch submersible pump,wells MW-li,MW-6s,MW-6i,
and MW-7s were purged of at least three well volumes with disposable Teflon bailers
just prior to sampling on October 4,1994,according to the procedures in
AppendixB.Wells MW-ls and MW-7i were purged to dryness before three well
volumes ofwater could be removed.
All six ground water samples were submitted for analysis of purgeable halocarbons
according to EPA Method 601 and for total chromium,copper,lead,and nickel
according to standard preparation Method 3030C.Preparation Method 3030C for
metals involves a filtering process conducted in the laboratory and is recommended
by the North Carolina Department of Environment,Health,and Natural Resources,
Division of Environmental Management (DEM).Method 3030C was not requested
for the total metals analysis performed from the original sampling of wells MW-l,
MW-2,MW-2i,MW-3,MW-4,and MW-5.
3.3 Survey and Ground Water Flow Direction
The reference point of each well was surveyed for vertical control against a
temporary benchmark at an assumed elevation of 100.00 feet located on the north
corner of the concrete slab for the former corn hopper and food grade oil
aboveground tanks.Static water levels were measured in all wells on-site with an
electric water level prohe on October 11,1994.Intermediate depth wells MW-2i,
MW-6i,and MW-7i were measured again on October 17,1994,to verify the original
data.
Page 40f7
I
I,
I
I
I,
I
1
I
I
I
J
I,
I
J,
I
Keebler Company
410791
October 18,1994
The water levels were used to calculate the water table elevation (shallow wells)or
potentiometric elevation (intermediate wells)at each well location.These elevatlons
were used to create a water table contour map and an intermediate potentiometric
contour map (see Table 1 and Figures 3 and 4).Figure 3 indicates the generalized
shallow ground water flow direction toward the west and figure 4 indicates the
generalized intermediate ground water flow direction toward the west-northwest (see
Section 4.2).
4 Hydrogeology
4.1 Site Geology
Based on the boring logs,apparent fill material was encountered to depths of
approximately 7 (MW-7!7i)to 15 feet (MW-6/6i)below the finished floor elevation.
The material beneath the apparent fill consisted primarily of micaceous silty fine
sand and fine sandy silt underlain by relatively thin layers of fairly competent and
weathered rock with flowing silts and sands to the ultimate auger refusal depths of 51
(MW-6i)to 54 (MW-7i)feet below grade.Boring MW-li did not encounter the
layered weathered rock zone and met with auger refusal at 32.5 feet below grade.
Bedrock consists of slightly to moderately fractured gneiss with small dikes and/or
sills of coarse grained granite.
According to the Geology and Mineral Resources of Wake County,North Carolina
Department of Resources and Community Development,Division of Land
Resources,Geological Survey Section,Bulletin 86,1979,the bedrock beneath the
site is classified as injected gneiss and schist and described as layered mica gneiss and
schist with numerous dikes and sills ofgranite,pegmatite,and aplite.
4.2 Hydraulic Gradients
As mentioned in Section 3.3,the generalized shallow ground water flow direction is
toward the west in response to a horizontal hydraulic gradient that ranges from
approximately 0.014 to 0.020 foot per foot.The generalized intermediate ground
water flow direction is toward the west-northwest in response to a horizontal
hydraulic gradient of approximately 0.0017 foot per foot.
The water levels measured in well nest MW-lsIMW-li were not included in either of
the contour maps due to the location of the wells on the northwest side of the filled-
in stream that traverses the property (see Figures 3 and 4).It is believed that the
filled-in stream may be a ground water discharge boundary, whereby ground water is
generally flowing toward the filled-in stream from all locations on-site (i.e.,ground
water to the southeast of the filled-in stream is flowing to the west and ground water
to the northwest of the stream is flowing generally to the southeast).Insufficient
water level data exists to the northwest of the filled-in stream to verify the ground
water flow direction in that area.Water level data was included from well MW-5 on
the water table contour map because of its proximity to the filled-in stream.
The vertical hydraulic gradients at well nests MW-lsIMW-li,MW-2sIMW-2i,
MW-6s/MW-6i,and MW-7sIMW-7i were calculated by dividing the difference in the
water level elevation between the respectively paired shallow and intermediate wells,
Page 5 of7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
IIIil
I
II
:i':"
I
I
I,
1
,I
Keebler Company
410791
October 18,1994
based on the October 11,1994,water level data,by the difference in elevation
between the midpoint of the saturated filter pack in the two wells.The vertical
gradient at well nests MW-ls/MW-li and MW-6s/MW-6i were 0.032 and 0.042 foot
per foot upward,respectively.The vertical gradient at well nests MW-2s/MW-2i and
MW-7s/MW-7i were -0.014 and -0.009 foot per foot downward,respectively.The
upward vertical gradient in the two well nests located nearest the tilled-in stream
(MW-ls/MW-li and MW-6s/MW-6i)indicates that these well are located in the
vicinity of a ground water discharge area.Conversely,The downward vertical
/lradient in the two well nests located furthest from the filled-in stream
(MW-2s!MW-2i and MW-7s/MW-7i)indicates that these wells are located in a
ground water recharge area.
5 Analytical Results
The purgeable halocarbon analytical results from the October 4,1994,sampling
event revealed several VOCs in shallow wells MW-6s and MW-7s and intermediate
wells MW-6i and MW-7i at total VOC concentrations ranging from 23.5 (MW-6i)to
7,022.7 JLg/L (parts per billion) (MW-7i).The samples from wells MW-7s and
MW-7i contained dichloromethane.The laboratory report indicated that
dichloromethane is a possible laboratory contaminant.
No purgeable halocarbons were detected at or above the method detection limit in
the samples collected from wells MW-ls and MW-li (see Table 2 and Appendix C).
Several of the VOCs detected in wells MW-6s,MW-6i,MW-7s,and MW-7i exceeded
2L Standards (see Tables 2 and 3).
The total metals analytical results by standard preparation Method 3030C revealed
concentrations of lead exceeding the 2L Standard in wells MW-ls,MW-6s,MW-6i,
MW-7s,and MW-7i.These lead concentrations may be indicative of background
(i.e.,naturally occurring)conditions (see Tables 2 and 3 and Appendix C).
Shallow and intermediate total VOC isopleth maps were generated based on the
analytical results from the sampling of the shallow and intermediate wells conducted
on August 22,1994,(wells MW-2s,MW-2i,MW-3s, MW-4s,and MW-5s)and
October 4,1994,(MW-ls,MW-li,MW-6s,MW-6i,MW-7s,and MW-7i)(see
Figures 5 and 6).Figure 5 indicates a VOC plume migrating generally to the west
from the Keebler!Aicatel property border with the highest concentrations in the
vicinity of well cluster MW-2s!2i!2d.Figure 6 indicates a VOC plume migrating
generally to the west from the Keebler!Alcatel property border with the highest
concentrations in the vicinity ofwell nest MW-7s/71.
6 Conclusions
Aquaterra concludes the following based on testing and observations conducted to
date:
•The area of ground water impact from VOCs appears to extend from
the northeastern property border with Alcatel to the central portion of
the Keebler property.
Page 6 of7
7 Recommendations
Page 70f7
Aquaterra recommends that Keebler continue to assist Alcatel in their assessment
activities by providing them access to the installed wells for monitoring purposes and
access to the Keebler property for additional well installation,as needed.Aquaterra
suggests that Keebler have an environmental representative on-site during all
activities performed by Alcatel to document such actIVities for liability reasons.
The next phase of ground water assessment at the site should include two paired
shallow and intermediate wells located to the south and southwest of well nest
MW-tsm outside the snack plant facility.
To determine whether impacted ground water is moving off-site,monitoring well
installation should proceed at approximately three locations along the central section
of the southwest property border.These wells should be installed as intermediate
wells in the top of fractured bedrock with the central well being nested with a shallow
well.
'I,
I
1
I,
1
I
1,
II,
I,
1
.1,
~
1
1,
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Keebler Company
410791
October 18,1994
The data indicate that the VOC plume concentrations and migration
rates appear to be greater in the top of fractured bedrock
hydrogeologic unit as compared to the shallow unconsolidated
hydrogeologic unit.
The filled-in stream located on the northwestern portion of the site is
probably a ground water discharge area indicated by the upward
vertical hydraulic gradients noted in well nests MW-ls/li and
MW-6s/6i.This condition could assist preventing further migration of
the plume to the west.
Downward vertical hydraulic gradients exist at well nests MW-2s/2i
and MW-7s/7i,which could enhance the downward movement of
contaminants in these areas to the fractured rock unit.
The relatively low concentrations of VOCs in well nest MW-6s/6i
appear to indicate that these wells are located near the downgradient
edge of the plume.
If the highly competent rock identified at depth in the boring for well
MW-2d extends across the site,this condition would help prevent
further vertical migration of contaminants into the deep competent
rock unit.
Neither the shallow nor intermediate horizontal extent of VOC impact
has been adequately defined to the south and southwest of the plant.
The data indicates that Alcatel continues to appear to be the most
likely source of the ground water contamination identified beneath the
Keebler property.
1
I.....-----=-:"---:--::::~~~~=:::;::~~~~~
I
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
I,
1
1
I
1l~~~2~~~~~~:"'~=--,:~~-rn~~~~;;'':'''::~~::jm.'''::''-:''::''::'''-;S~lte~Lo;;;c:;;ation;;;;;;:-;Ma;;;p__===JaI-r,;hN,""-1-1/;;;:;:r.:r.;:n~g:u;,,---1o;'7-~Z~8:-94:-"Pr<;;ecr--~~~~;-:=----lJ.~aauaTl!!!lrra r ev,""on ,gu'""'"")Be Koebler Site
:"',,--~0 0.1 1-;;;:2000'RaWSh,North ,Carolina-4106300A.QIltA.'I'~CHmlIC.AL CORPORA'lWN wwPANT
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
___J
L
Tn..d<Parkl1J
hre
'=4s~
(Rallroed
Spu-
oxa I
ParI<rg
Srec!<Plant
FacIlity
MW
~MW-~-7s~
-f----------------1--
r--
AJcatai N3tv.aI<Systans
MW-2s
MW-2d~MW-~r-
----
~MW-ff3
~MW-!l
Laadln;)
hre
WarrJu.£i>
E>pmsbn
,___.._/W-----,-y-:-----
///(
////
~
~
~
I~!MW-jl ~,M"...;~,I ////
•/ij /I /ij ,.-
I ////
I •///
I I II r
1 :~::I j
I I II I
"
I I II I I I
I I II I
,"
!I I IIII I
• I I ,1::;:
I I ,
,f ,I:t •
i " /I 0,i :M#-&;
i:/,'
I I '
I !..Fcon::r-A::utai : /Of StrrernRIIOO h
RErcuted Strea",\i.:':For Wa'a'>::u>3 E>pmsloo
h !21 84',"1 /
Corrugate:l I 1 "IMetalPip;e •1 II I :
I I II I rIII;;i I :~I r Proprty~YI L __Una,--._~-------_._----._--.-._--
n ~i'?ir__"_~"'-lIlillL-II"~~~__i~_".'~~:7~;;';"i"-7 71 •.. .....I
,,
/,
/,,,
/
Six Faksfbatj
Legend
o Shallow M::fJtorIrg Walilocallm
~In_lalaMJnItcrirg Well LocatiCfl
~~M:JnIIcrIrg Wall Location (ho:xrp'ete)
Autlwr Drawing Layers ful''!'itl.
EVe 4l1Ji1>1 0,1~7-25-94 Mrltori1J Walll.ocatloo M3p
Jab No.Revision Figure-Scale-Frojeot I<aal::kSIte
4107001 10-17-94 2 l'=100'RaIaIgh,North CaroIlra
I
/If,Gt::A1 I.N!:±i Q-B..oCAL o:::Ff'CPAn::N C£J.PI1Nt
A~aClUaTE!rra
---.
\I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I,
I
I
I,
I
I
___J
L
TrUd<Par1<IrgIVea
88
"'"
86
Parking
84
-l----------------t-.--
Neate!N3lm1<SysIErm
-~-,
J
,
I
Formar Fb.rte
Of Stream A!Ied h
FcrW"eI1l>.J;>3 E>j:anslcrl
7a-."'0/ij /MW-11 ~,MWc1s'
/ij /
////
////
/ij /
///
r
L,
___.~_!'W.....~~...;---
//I (
....ij /,
~
~
~
1,
I,
I
I,
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I'1 II I •
I ill J /
I 'II I
I J II I 0,
I ''1 I r-<'e•j II I fJ7)
1 I H I1ilI ~~~:::t:
I I II I
~.~straam?\h':'I :"'1t:H~~84'I E I •
1,.1::/I!ICarugatedIIIiI
Metal Pipes !I II I /l I II I r
l :::Y r Prcprty~lfl L __Urn-_._---------------~---._---
....7 7 7 7 ,a 7 , , 7 , 7 7 ,, ,....I \
,
I,,.
/,,
J
SixFo1<s Fbad
Legrmri
..,
~
~
/'----
Shallow Mlnltor1rg Well Lccatlcrl
1n1Em1Edla1e MonItor1rg Well Location
D€<p MonItorlrQ WrJllccatIoo Ihmrrplate)
Ci"c.rdWater Ccnrou-
Ci"c.rdWater Plow ClrocIIoo
K€OOIEr Sits
f'al8Igh,N:<1h C>YoIlra
water Table Coo'<cu Mer:>(1~11-941
tject
TillEAuthorDrawingLayers!Jaw
EVe 4i'<lill-1 0.1,3 7-25-94
Joo No.Revi..sion F1.guTe Scale
4107E0t 10-17-94 B 1'~1WA(ffAT 'I.#<ES o-e.t::PL o::FFQlo',Tl:).,I CQ.PlNt
~aauaTerra
---- ----
\
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I__.J
L
Trud<ParkJrg
Nea
t-4S0
~"fIend
e Shallow MJnItoIYq Well location
<§>.,_IataMonltCllt1l Welt locatkn
~!JEep M:f'Itcro-g WeillocaIIon (h:,:)rqolotel
~Cro.rrl Wata"Cootcu
___Cro.rrl WatEr Row llroc1tm
Raitoad
~
%
rxxxo
ParIdrg
MW-3se
84,00'
~WJ-71MW-7s~184$1
\
-l----------------t-
r-;:::
Abltsll\l3tv,a\<e,mare _
,-
845ll'
Six Forks fbaj
,
I,,
I
I,,
I
Fctrr<rFbutB
OfStream RIIOO n
For VoIar€l"lc<m E>q:anslon
~,'"I
/ij /f
e/
MW-Ss
/,,
t,,
7r:Jl."'0/ij /MW-11 ~--Mlll'1'"
////
I'ij /
/ij /
/ij /
lj ,-
I II
I II
I II
I II,"
1 "
"
"
"
"
"
"
,,,
I,,
/
/
~
E
i
"""II
"II
Fbi<culOO S1room7th''I~{2la4'1l:ICorruJated.I 11 I
M3taI PIpes 1 I II I :
I I II I ~
I II :/
•I II j /Prq::a1y~t;1 L __Urn------------------------------
.......IIliiii 7 7 7 P n , ,J ;?.5',i i
__________of'~------------ -
K€<t:IEr Sits
-(f1,N:>r1h Carollra
hlErrra:liata Po1EntlcmalrioCcntcu M3p 110-17-941
'ject
'TiHe
Scale
l'~'!bII
lfJa..te
7-25-S4
Au-thor .Drawing Laygrs
EVe 41076-1 0,1,4
Job No.Revisi.an fi"igure-
4101l'01 10-t!l-S4 4......~I ~Q-B.Co!i..c:a:F'CRol!."ID{oo.,.p,o'N'f
~aCluaTerra
~....-.r-.~,•.
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
___J
L
Tru::k Pa1<Irg
A'ea
rxXX:CJ
Pa1<Irg
-f----------------t-
.----
Ak:atal N>tw:xk 8,'s!Etns
)---....,
loadlrg I
Area \,I /~,ee0
Snad<Pmt
Fadnly
(1'0.1)~MN-71 1//~MW-66 MN-7s '"
'"MW-fl 128'l.61
W~I I
/
E:qEns1on /
NJ
/'
/'
,-i
/'
~----
/
j
j
Farr<:<Fl:ute
OfStreem Riled h
Fer Wara'lcuse &pension
'1/MW-6s
1m
,,
t
___________/W
-~~_._~--------
///(
/ij /I.,~~I MW-Il <y'M».;;',,i /~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
J
~t
I,
"'I
II
II
II
R::rcuta:l -?In'II I 'h (2]84'I II I jO:m.gated I 11 I
lI"taI Ppeo !I II I "
I I II I •
I II ;;i I ~~J r Property~lf'L __Line---_.-----------_.-.-._--.-
...'7 n ",7 a ,n 71 7 5 7 ....,-.-
,,
/
j,,
I
Notes:
Six R:<I<s Fl:ad
Cl:Jrrpcrn:Js 1<lenlIIEd as possible Ial:aatrxy<XlIlIamInants
IYEffirot m.ded in btals.
Wflls MW-2s>21,as,Os.an:l5s_e sarrped 00 &22-1l4,
Wflls MW-1s.11,6s,El,78,a>:I71_e sarrPEd 00 1M-94,
Legend
'"~
~
(326)
NJ
~M:lrdl:flrg we,Locatbn
I_lateM::rttcrrg W€lI Localan
!JEEp M::rItor'rg Well Location ~letel
Total VoIatJla CXQanIc Carpc<n:!
(vCCl Cora:t1tJ3\Ion
Not [),tooted At a-/lI:xM3lhe M3lhOO
CX*ctbn UmIt
Author
EVe
A l:i"tA1 l.o"N:;::j a-e.cAL ca::FCAATQ.I o::t.oPPN'f
Joob No.
410i1'01
Drawing Layers Dale 1'i~Sh3IIcw Total VCf::<;O::o::Entratl::fl Map410il3-1 0,1,5 7-25-94
Revisi<Jn Figure Scale-jeol _Site
1~1&94 5 1'~1W Raleigh,N:JrIh Carollm
liM ,7'7 F R , 7 r s t J ,in,'....,
\I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I.
1
I
1
1,
I
___J
L
Tn.d<Pa<t<trg
hea
I
I
I
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'a<I<I"Q
I
/
NJ
/
'/
/'-1,ooa
M1'1-3s",
./
-f----------------1--
r-
5£00 Sred<Rant
Fadtlty\
MW-71 /
\M1'1-7s~flI/JT:!y
"-./
'-
\
---l--;
\
\
\
"-""
looolr(l
MOO
\
\
'\
~MW-Bs~MW-(,/
12351
W<!tfh:Jt.se
Expansl::o
I,,
j
I,,
!,
",,I
MW.os
/
-/41
/ij /1
,,
'..Forrra Fbuta
(OfStream R/aj ",For Wa€!louEe Expansion
~
~
i
~I.,
/ij /!M1'1-11 '"AM"1s''\:jIWI////~
•/-'l /I /ij /
I /lj /
I ///
I II I
I,I II I
I II 1
i :
i :
i :
i :
1 :tf
i :
i :
i :
i :i :
i :
I, ,j ,,,
I',,,,
FaculEd Streemr1M',h(2)84',,!
():mgated "
Metal PIPes !'I,'
!:I}/Prapny~~L L1r<l
~-----~_.-
,
/
,
j,
/
Notes:
Six FcfI<s fba:j
Ccrrp:lm:Is Ida1Ufla:l as possi>1e 1alx:mtory=tarnrantE
'Jo'fSe 001 h<:iJ:la:j In totals.
W€l1s MW-2s,21,as,4s,ard 56 Wff8 mrp1eden 8-22-94.
W€l1s MW-1s,11,63,6,7s,ard 71 Wff8 ~en 10-4-94.
Legend
'"~
~
1235)
NJ
Shallow M:Jntl:ftrg Well Location
tn_lata Mnt<Xt1J Well Localoo
D>zp ~Wf'fJ Localoo Ih::<:nl'letsl
Tolat VoIa~1a C<oanb O:xrp:lm:l
(I,I(X;I Countrallon
NotD3looled At ex Ai:>:Ml The M3lh:xI
Dets:olm L1mt
Author
EVe
.Drawing
41076-1
WY"'"
0,1,6
ful.
7-25-94
TWe htermEdla1e Total VCf::s CcrcentratJon M3p
A (rE.lo,T ~Q-B,.Co!t..o::fF'(Ro\n:::N CI:1:.PINI
JQO Ne..
4tl7l'0t
Revision
1e.-1B-94
FigUTr!
6
Soale
l'=100'
tjed __Site
Palelgh,~eaullna
Aquaterra Job No.4107601
410791
All units in feet referenced to temporary site benchmark at assumed elevation of100.00feet
a Measured On October 17,1994
Monitoring Well Reference Point and Ground Water Elevations,
Keebler Company Facility,Raleigh,North Carolina.
78.31
79.01
84.67
84.39
84.57a
86.29
88.96
78.97
82.59
84.06
84.2~
85.01
84.60
84.65a
Water Level
Elevation
Water Level
Measurement
(October 11,1994)
Reference
Point
Elevation
Monitoring
Well
Table 1.
MW-ls 95.29 16.98
MW-li 95.17 16.16
MW-2s 99.24 14.57
MW-2i 98.47 14.08
98.47 13.90"
MW-2d well incomplete Dry@80'
MW-3s 98.84 12.55
MW-4s 99.98 11.02
MW-5s 93.99 15.02
MW-6s 99.80 17.21
MW-6i 99.80 15.74
99.80 15.51a
MW-7s 99.88 14.87
MW-7i 99.76 15.16
99.76 15.Ua
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1IIIiIi __....
Table 2.October 4,1994,Ground WaterAnalytical Results,Keebler Company Facility,Raleigh,North Carolina.
SamplelD
Parameter MW-Is MW-li MW-6s MW-6i MW-7s MW-7i
Purgeable Halocarbons (EPA Method 601)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ?1,1,1-TCA)NO NO 1.7 1.6 16 230a
1,1,2-Trichloroethene TeE)NO NO 27a 4.4a NO 11a
1,1-Dichloroethane ~I,I-DCA)NO NO 4.8 ND 2.8 9.5
I,I-Dichloroethene I,I-DCE~NO ND 23a 12a 89"640"
1,2-0ichloroethane 1,2-DCA ND NO NO NO NO 5a
1,2-0ichloropropane ND NO NO ND ND 7.4a
Chloroform ND NO 0.6 NO 0.8a 4.sa
Oichloromethaneb ND NO NO NO 1.1 15a
Tetrachloroethene (PCE)NO NO 13a 5.5a 120"6,100"
Total ND ND 70.1 23.5 229.7 7,022.7
Total Metals (Standard Preparation Method 3030q
Chromium NO NO NO NO NO NO
Copper NO NO NO NO NO NO
Lead 3sa 11 23a l03a 2la 19"
Nickel NO NO 16 NO NO NO
Allunits in pg/kg (parts per bi/lum)
ND =Not detected ator above the methoddetection limit
a Concentration exceeds T15A NCAC 02L Groundwater Quality Standards;see Table 3
b Dichloromethane is apossible laboratory contaminant
Aquaterra Job No.4107601
410791
All units in parts per billion
Aquaterra Job No.4107601
410791
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
'.
1
1
1
Table 3.North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standards,Keebler Company
Facility,Raleigh,North Carolina.
T15ANCAC02L
Compound Groundwater Quality Standard
I, I,I-Trichloroethane (1,1,I-TCA)200
1,1,2-Trichloroethene (TCE)2.8
l,l-Dichloroethane (1,I~DCA)700
1,I-Dichloroethene (l,l-DCE)7.0
1,2-Dichloroethane (1,2-DCA)0.38
1,2-Dichloropropane 0.56
Chloroform 0.19
Dichloromethane 5.0
Tetrachloroethene (PCE)0.7
Lead 15
Nickel 100
1 Boring !Well Construction Log
Wen Construction Permit Number
1
1..I.D.Number
Project Name
Project No.1 Geologist
Start Date 9/26194 Complete Date
NA Aquaterra,Inc.
Ground Water Monitoring
Bore &Core,Inc.
763
Tony Debetsky
CME-7S
Drilling Method 41/4"ID hollow stem augers to refusal at32.5';4"air hammerto-,--
Comments 42.5';very Ilighflow ofwater during drilling;installS'screen with
filter sock (no sandpack)to 42.5';time release bentoniteplaced in-top ofsock above screen with hose clamps.No split-spoon samples
taken.FID/PID
Wen Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From -To Soil /Rock Description /Comments @ Depth (ft.)
Borehole Dia.8"/4"0'-3"Topsoil
Riser Type PVC 3"-11'Dark gray slightly clayey silty mIcaceousfme-,
fine to medium sand-possiblefillDiameter2"_.
Screen Type PVC 11'-15'Gray slightly clayey silty micaceousfine to medium
Diameter 2"-SAND(SM)
~
Riser Interval 0'-37.5'15'-16'Gray slightly clayey silty micaceousfine to medium
Screen Interval 37.5'-42.5'-SAND (SM)with rockfragments
Slot Size 0.010"16'-25'Greenish gray silty CLA Y (CL)with minor organic
Grout Type Portland #1 -debris (very stiff)
Interval 0'-33'25'-32.5'Silty fine to medium micaceous SAND (SM)with
Bentonite Type Time Release -rockfragments-,
Interval 33'-37.5'32.5'-42.5'Gneissic bedrock (fracture notedfrom 38.8'to
,•.~
Filter Pack Screen Sock -40.01-
Interval 37.5'-42.5'-
Total Depth 42.5'-Auger refusal@32.5'--R.P.Elevation 95.17'-Boring terminated@42.5'
Datum TBM -
Water Level Information -
Date W.L.Below RP.-
10/11/94 16.16'-
-
-
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Style 2.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
R.P.=Reference Point W.L.=Water Level TEM ~Temporary Benchmark MSL =Mean Sea Level
Aqua''''a Doc·41076LOO.xLS.Pagel
1 Boring !Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number
1
NA
10/2/94
Aquaterra,Inc.
Ground Water Monitoring
Bore &Core,Inc.
763
Robert Cassell
Mobile B·S3ATV
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Drilling Method 41/4"ID hollow stem augers.
Comments No split.spoon samples taken;wellinstalled inside warehouse.,.
,,~-
FIO/PIO
Wen Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From·To Soil I Rock Description /Comments @ Depth (ft.)
Borehole Dia.8"0'-7"ConcreteSlab
Riser Type PVC 7u -1'GravelSubbase
~.•.~
Diameter 2"1'·IS'Reddish-brown fine sandy silt •Probable Fill-,
Screen Type PVC IS'-23'Gray siltyfine SAND (SM)
Diameter 2"·
Riser Interval 0'·13'·
Screen Interval 13'-23'·Boring terminated@ 23'.,
Slot Size 0.010"·,
Grout Type Portland #1 ·
Interval 0'·9'·
Bentonite Type Pellets ·
Interval 9'·11'·
filter Pack Coarse Sand ·--,-
Interval 11'·23'-
Total Depth 23'·
R.P.Elevation 99.80'·
Datum TBM -
Watel"Level Infol"mation -
Date W.L.Below R.P.·
10/11/94 t lJ\>'.:'i'9·11,U ·
·
-1 R,P.;Reference Point W L.;Water Level TBM;Temporary Benchmark MSL ;Mean Sea Level
1
1
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Style 2.
Aqua/en"a Dcc-41076LOG.XLS,Pagel
1 Boring !Well Construction Log
1
Wen Construction Permit Number NA Aquaterra,Inc.
'I
1
I.D.Number
Project Name
Project No.
Geologist
Start Date
MW-6i Purpose-------,-----------Keebler Company -Raleigh Contractor
4107601 Registration No.
Tom TaylorlDave Stewart Driller-------:--------9/27/94 Complete Date 10/2194 Equipment
Ground Water Monitoring
Bore &Core,Inc.
763
Tony Debetsky
Mobile B-53 ATV
MSL ~Mean Sea LevelTBM~Temporary BenchmarkWL.~Water Level
Drilling Method 41/4"ID hollow stem augers to refusal at 51 ';4"air hammer to
Comments 58';well installed inside warehouse;5'SCreen with filter sock (no.--santipack);time release bentonite placedin top ofsockabove
screen with hose clamps.No split-spoon samples taken.
FID 1PID
Wen Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From -To Soil 1Rock Description 1Comments @ Depth (ft.)
Borehole Dia.8"/4"0'-7"CMcrete slab-Riser Type PVC 7"-1;Gravelsubbase
Diameter 2"1'-15'Reddish-brownfine santly silt-probablefill-,--Screen Type PVC 15'-28.5'Gray siltyfine SANlJ (SM)
Diameter 2"28.5'-51'Layers ofweathered rock anti clayeyfine /0
Riser Interval or~53'-medium sand-....-
Screen Interval 53'-58'51'-58'Competent gneissic hedrock (4"fracture no/etl-Slot Size 0.010"-atabou/537
Grout Type Par/land #1 --,,--
Interval 0'-51'-
Bentonite Type Time Release -Augerrefusal@ 51'
~.~..
Interval 51'-53'-Boring /ermina/ed@58'
Filter Pack Screen Sock -
Interval 53'-58'-
Total Depth 58'-
R.P.Elevation 99.80'-
Datum TBM -.-Water Level Information -..
Date W.L.Below R.P.-
10/11194 15.'74'-
-
-
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 R.P.~Reference Paint
1 Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Style 2.
1 Aquaterra Doe-41076LOOXLS,Page3
1 Boring !Well Construction Log
Wen Construction Permit Number
L D.Number
Keebler Company -Raleigh
4107601
1
I Project Name
Project No.
1 Geologist
Start Date
MW-7.
Dave Stewart
10/3/94 Complete Date 10/3/94
NA Aquaterra,Inc.
Ground Water Monitoring
Bore &Core,lI,c.
763
Robert Cassell
CME-4SATV
Drilling Method 4114"ID hollow stem augers.
Comments No split-spoon samples taken;well installed inSide plam building.-
-FID/PID
Wen Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From ·To Soil/Rock Description /Comments @Depth(ft)
Borehole Dia.8"0'-7"Concrete slab ---Riser Type PVC 7"-l'Gravel Subbase
Diametcr 2"1'-7'Reddish-brown to dark brown slightly clayey-Screen Type PVC -silt with wood debris -probablefill
Diameter 2"7'-12'Reddish-brownfine sandy clayey micaceous SILT-Riser Interval 0'-13'·(ML)-possiblefill_.
Screen Interval 13'-23'12'-23'Orange-brown fine sandy SILT (ML)..•
Slot Size 0.010"-,-Grout Type PorI/and #1 -
Interval 0'-9'--Bentonite Type Pellets -Boring terminated@23'
Interval 9'-1l'-
Filter Pack Coarse Sand ·-Interval 11'-23'-
Total Depth 23'-
R.P.Elevation 99.88'-
Datum TBM -
Water Level Information ·
"Date W.L.Below R.P.-
10/1l/94 14.87'-.
-
·
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Style 2.
1
1
1
1
1
'I
1
1
1
'I
1
1
1
I
1
R.P.~Reference Point W.L.~Water L,""el TBM ~Temporary Benchmark MSL ~Mean Sea L,""el
Aquaterra Doc-41076LOG,XLS,Page4
1 Boring !Well Construction Log
1
Well Construction Permit Number NA Aquaterra,Inc.
CME-45 ATV10/2/94
Purpose Ground Water MOllitoring--:::------------------Contractor Bore &Core,Inc.-----
Registration No.763-------------------
Driller Tony,Larry,Jim-----'-----------~-------------=-'---------'-------
1 L D.Number MW-7i
Project Name Keebler Company -Raleigh
Project No.4107601
1 Geologist T.TaylorlM.TischlerlD.Stewart
Start Date 9/29/94 Complete Date
MSL ~Mean Sea LevelTEM=Temporary BenchmarkWL=Water Level
Drilling Method 41/4"ID hollow stem augers to refusal at 54';cOre rockfrom 54'.
Comments to 73 ';well illstalled inside plant building.15'screen with jiltersock-(no sandpack);time release bentoniteplaced in top ofsock above-_.-
screell with hose damps.No split-spoon samples takell.
,~.~
FID!PID
Wen Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From -To Soil!Rock,Description !Comments @ Depth (ft.)
Borehole Dia.8"/4"0'-7"Concrete slab
.~".."
Riser Type PVC 7"-l'Gravel subbase
Diameter 2"l'-7'Reddish-brown to dark brown slightly dayey
Screen Type PVC -silt with wood debris -probablejill
Diameter 2"7'-12'Reddish-brownjine sandy dayey micaceous SlLT
,~~.
Riser Interval 0'-58'-(ML)-possiblejill
~
Screen Interval $8'-73']2'-25'Orange-brownjine sandy SILT (ML)..
Slot Size 0.010"25'-54'Layers ofweathered rock and dayeyjine to -Grout Type Portland #1 -medium sandy silt
.~~~
Interval 0'-56'54'-73'Competent gneissic bedrock (jew smallseams
Bentonite Type Time Release -noted@69'and7I',II2"each)
Interval 56'-58'-
Filter Pack Screell Sack -..
Interval 58'-73'-
"
Total Pepth 73'-Auger refusal@54'_.".
R.P.Elevation 99.76'-Boring terminated@ 73'
Datum TBM -
Water Level Information -
Date W.L.Below RP.-
10/11/94 15.i6'-
-
-
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 R.P.=Reference Point
1 Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Style 2.
1 Aquaterra Doc-4J076LOO.xLS,Page5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
~aCluaTerra
Protective Manhole Casing
With Lockable Cap
&al'IdMt Tl/INlll Bslowgrade Mon~o,inll
111I'811 Clml!!iruclion SChen"'Ii<:
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
III Identification
Drilling Contractor
liller Registration Number
North Carolina Dc::partment ofEnvironmental,Health &N:,ltural Resourl:es
Division ofEnvil"onmcntal Management-Groundwater Sc=:clion
P.O.Box 27687-Ralcigh.N.C.21611-7587
For Office Use Only
Quad.No.Serial No.._
Lat.Long.Pc'---_
Minor Basin _
Basin Code _
HeadetEnt..GW-l Ent._
State Well Construction Permit
Number:,...,~--:........;~------------
kw-li.
1
1
Drill Log
Formation Description
11'~S.04 D kHOlv-.....S~­
PP$';,e.~F</",-
fiM1 S£-U1"'Th1 CLA1I'i'7 "'ur<r n,~
f")H'€n 11.€'91 U'>'-s.~(SM\
Ifaddilional space is needed,use back ofform.
To
~.
I ocMioo Sketch
(Sbow diro::tion &distilJl~c:from at l/last two State Roads.or oll'iet map refercn<:c:points,)
County:
Q -
3 1l
--
15 '-t(.,·
Mm<ri>l
PVC
Top OfCasin.g
Wall Thickness
Sch40
AmOunt-----
\I..-
Zip Code
Usc=:OfWell Monitoring
Cuttings Cotlected---'-=N""'o;:';:>'---
No
State
Feet Above Land Surface
Test Method-----
Feet B~low
2"
Djameter
(Ff,o,,-d.Community.or Subdivi~iOn and LotNo.)
1?J?b-6L6f2-~P,;.,..,<t
Addn:ss
1 City
~"Drill,d 9 -1.'l-"/4=
otal D<pth 42 _5"•
~_es Well Replace Ex:isting Well
6.Static Water 1(.,_\Ie
1 Level
::pofCasing 0
7.Yield (gpm):N p..
'
Water Zones;
(depth)
.Chlorination:
I .Casing;
':pepth (ft )
From To ,10 -'37.S
.ell Location:(Show sketch ofthe location below)
I,ares,Towno I2ALE'15;..\.N L.
'2-9 c 0 IN A:~f!«h,---';''l J?,.O.
M<lhQl!
~IE
P/...ACfllIN
sCfUElJ ~t>Cl",.
l·G~Qut;
:oepth eft)
from To
-~"3'~,
!~
Depth (fl;)
I rom To Diameter ~M.awiiU
".5 ~41..'5'__2.=-"---'0"'-'·'c::.l)-'..:'0::...·_·__----'-p_,,=L.'------_
Date
SUbmit oritinal to Div;sion o~EnvirorunC:1'i131 f'danagc:ment &copy to well ownc:r.
Ido hereby certify that this weU was consUucted in accordance with 1SNCAC 2C.w
standards,and that acopy Ofthis record has been provided to the well owner.
tW-l Revised 2190
Aqllaterra,Inc.Document-Well_Logi.Page-l
.
'....Gravel Pack:
'".peptb (ft )From,To',IS -42..S
14.Rem","':
i 1
-----
I"
"--"I
I
I
I~f}'
I:1
I"
•
E
•
m
I
.....'U or 1lJ1.'1t{J 'Y(!f'$'\.e,~_a CI u a T -rra ,""""=--...,b==-+==---J"~7-;;28:..-=94:..-J,,;=,,....-__S_ite::-Loc....,..,...a_tiO.,,.n,....Ma.,...p ---I~IIi:ii:ii 0 0.e:V\Sl.01t 'l.g'I.LTB (l.i?JeC Keebler Site
A mu:A.T Lill!::!l CHEWlCAL CO~IlATION t:!»lPJ.Kr 4106300 1 1"~2000'Raleigh.North Carolina
For Office Use Only
Quad.No..Secial No._
Lat Long.Pc _
Minot Basin ~_~__
Basin Code._
Beade,Enl.GW.\Enl.,_~_
State Well Construction Permit
Number:_{l/"""d"'-~~~~~~~~~_
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
MW-tos
North Carolina Department ofEnvironmc=:nttll,Health &Natural Resources
Division ofEnvironmental Mana.zcment-GrOl,lndwilter Section
P.O.Box 27687·Raleigh,N.C.27611-7587
II
III Identification
Drilling Contractor
JllerRegistration Number
1
T'dl Location:(Shj\sketch ofthe location below)"
'e"",stTown:'8le~i\)IJ crib C.aroLn.a
'2-<1 0 w A1tf 'F'i:t=<k-~f?-.D
.t -
County:
I',15'
fulh
From to
0'-']"
7 1
>...I'
(Road.Community.or Subdivision and Lot No.)~~~b ~jl.S"t:f;nd~r~
(Street or Routo No.)
El",h,,~~t I L (QCI::l("
Le,
Address
1
City State Zip Code~le Drilled 10.1 Z./94-Use ofWell Monitoring
,otal Depth _J.'>I Cuttings cOliected====~~N:O==~~==~.c=:$Well Replace Existing Well,=--""",,N,--O~__
6.Static Water ga+3 ,,;,C1.'2.\Feet Below Top OfCasing
1....,oLrce'",el"n".,0
,::.Q ''I ,.....Fec=:t Above Land Surface
7.Yield (gpm):--":.,-.cA.-'-----Test MethodralerZones:----~--
(depth)
J.hlonnaticn:NA Amount ~----
l'C",ins,
,:,Dentb (ft )
From To:f_'_'_I_~._
Diameter
2"
Wall Thickness
Seh 40
~
PVC
Ifaddilional space is needed,use back ofform.
I,Qs:atjQO Sketch
(Show ditet<tiQn &distance from allca:il twoStilte~oad~,QI'Qthet I'tIap rdeuDcepoints.)
.1'~:;~~:(fi )
rom To
,"I'F<II'
J..t..Screen;
pepth (it)
rI,"tO~Toi.~-;t~'
Ml!llli;l/
1.ftI,;,,,d I
Bentonite
Djamc=:ter ~
C ."10
~X?t cO'POc..r(L
poV'/t..
1'".Grav"l Pack:
IXnth (ft)
From To·
If-'-'_-....2""3"-
14.Remarks:
OfContractor or Agent
SUbmitoriginal to Divi:sion ofEnvironmental Mnnagc:mcnt &l:0PY to 'well owner.
I do hereby certify that this well was c:onstn.1cted in accordance with 15 NCAC 2C,weI construction.
stnndards,and tha.t acopy ofthis record h:as bc=:c=:n provided to the well owner.
tW-1 Revised 2190
Aquaterra,Inc_DDcument~WdtLogJ,Page-l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
'I
North Carolina Department ofEn....ironmental.Health &Natural Resources
Division ofEnvironmental Mana~emc:nt·Groundwaler Section
P.O,Box 27687·Ralelgh,N,C.27611·75S7
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
For Office Use Only
Quad.No.,Serial No._
Lat.LQn~.Pc'---_
Minor Basirt _
Basin Code'_
He.de,Ent.GW.\Ent.,_
lell Identification
Drilling Contractor
rner Registration Number
Gqfl£.INc...State Well Construction Permit
Number:__-'N'""'-!(l.,.co-_
Prj!!I og
Forma.tion Description
C.(1't..>C:fu5'€'"'.LA--i!.
Count)':
Iklllh
From TI)
D -J"
:J'"-I'
.,
5]-~
!2.Rro,SIl -e,~51:.117 .!Ok"Nr>'7 SI ....'
I"S '-2.8·')'-=~~rn:=_~..-'!.r!hl....r;c4-fi.l::JFV:'-I>'."J1fJ<..___...,~~~.l<I-6""-1.<\+--_
1.8.5\'5:,'LAA!f/ZS.6?~O<.cZ "'=A
0=A"Je<1 BtoR =m b&C>l<r<-\skMP
Top or Casing
p.l .
Amount,_
Zip Code
Use ofWell Monitoring-...:=~=­Cuttings Conected_~~N~O=_____
No
fc~t Below
Feet Above::Land Surface
T"t M,thod,_
(Road r Community.orSubdlvhio";md Lot No.)
(Stre,t 0'Rout,No.)
EfU1 thcf!.:=.-t .1L...
tvner
Address
,~ell Location;(Show sketch ofthe location below)
1f<l"e51Towno @ALWl<:;H:,NL
2 'to0 ldAl.!.€\3r!U3T a..o,
1 City State
3.Dal. D,iII'd I0 -2.-"14lTOlalD,pth 5 e '
;Does Well Replace Existing Well
6.Static Water \';>.,4
1 Levd
porCasing '0
7.Yield (gpm):N I>e
8 Water Zones:1 (depth)
,Chlorination:
I:'.Casing;
,Depth (ft)
From To 1
r~-~~-
Djameter
2"
Wall Thickness
Sch40
Ml!l<riol
PVC
Ifadditional space is needed,use back offonn.
I amnion Sketch
(Show dit~tion &dislan~e from at I~.\'I$~two Slate Roads,or other map ~f,=renee point$.)
MlI\OIi.o1
e['!Ljl....WC
Bentonite:tnk~
~~E')
t",.Grout
])s;ntb (ft )
rrom To
~l'
;:-S'
" _Screen:
Dtpth at)
~,.',rom To,I_ye'Djameter
2;'
~
"0.0\D"
MollmilI
PVC-
construction
Si8nature ofContractor Or Agent Dau.:
Submit ori~in311()DivisionofEnvironmental Mana,gement &.copy towell owner.
'.'.Gravel Pack:
:~Dtgtb (ft )
~.
!~
Ido hcrt:by certify that this welt was constructe::d in accordance with 15 NCAC :lC,
standards,and that a copy ofthis record has been provided to the well owner.
fW.l Revised 2190
Aqtta!el7(l,Inc,DDClJment~Wi!ltLogl.Page·J
I
I
I
I
IiIi
I
For Office Use Only
Quad.No..Serial No._
Lat.Long.Pe'_
Minor Basin _
Basin Code,_
He.d«Ent.GW_1 Ent._
State Wen Construction Permit
Number:...J.:::ot1u,g"'-~_
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
..J!JW-1:;
J)O(C ~{2,(e,Ir\""
North Carolina Departmen~ofEnvironmcntal,Health &Natural Resource$
Division ofEnvironmental Manil~emc:nt.GroundwaterSection
P.O.Box 27687-Raleigh,N.C.27611-75871
1
lUldentification
Drilling Contractor
I JUt<Registration Number
C e <
LT L.
L -5 L
("0 "
prjll Jog
Fonnatjon Description
C~"lf'"t'"SI ab
County:
1'-P-'
7"-I'
From 10
o -'7"
Top OfCasing
Amount _
Zip Code
Use ofwell_-:M::;o;::n:::it::o,::in::;g'---_
Curtinss Collected__-,N;;o::.....__
No
IL
State
Foot Below
Feet Above Land Surface::
Test Method -----
(Street or Route No.)
E.\J""cs"l
(RQad I Community.or Subdivi:';l¢n and Lot NQ.)
B~~bk;f~S 'T:f~a1!k'L:lwner
Address
1
Y,~II Location:(Show Skc:tc.h ofthe location below).
1",""Snown,R2(~t.,t:I.dh r ;:l/·d.u'nl...!2"'=--o---_
7.qoo:r\A.,)W F;tfl.?TI t7-D,
eity
~ale Drilled r~{31s1
"01,1 Depth .1 :!>'
~.oes Well R.c=place Existing Well
6.Stalie W,,,,,14..81 '
I Level
"ofCasing I'l';;:'
7.Yiold (gpm),f\('"
:tater Zones:
,(depth)
~hlormatlOn:A9-
l easing'
"R1!ptb (ft )
From To:1'-13'
llli=
2-
Wall Thickness
Seh 40
Mm<ri.al
PVC
Ifadditional space is needed,use back ofform.
Jocatjon Sketch
(Show dir«:tiOn &.(!i$I.\UI.~~f'tQm 3.!lea!lt two State Roads.or otb~r map I'l::r~tetl~tl poin!.s:.)
~Grout:;1 Dtptb (ft)
t'rom To
~',,
-".I •Sc~cn~
l'kpth (ft)
ii,','rom To'13'-.;J.:,:>'
Mm<ri.alfcrtI2",e!.I
Bentonite
(Stm
_,.Gravel Pack:
':.fknth eft )
From To
~':'~
Signature ofContractor Or Ag~nt Date
Submit ori,&jn.;tl to Division ofEnvironmcnml MilDas,ement &copy to well OWl'\et.
IW-1 Rev1Sed 2190
Aqua/eTTa.InC.DocumentwWell~LogI.Page-l
I I do herebY certify that this welI was constructed in ac:cQrdance with 15 NCAC 2e,
standards,and that a copy ofthis record has been provided to the:well owner.
Lo-,-l8-"i
~aauaTG!rra
J..GRtAT UKES ~COJ!POR4\'IU)N COMPANY
u or
o 0-
4106300
."""",n
7-2IJ-94
co.
I"~2000'
oJ"C
Site Location Map
Keebler Site
Raleigh,NQrth Carolina.
I
I"""
I
I·'~
I
I
.,.ilIi
I
I
For Office Use Only
Quad.No.~Serial No,_
Lat.Long.Pc,-_~_
Minor Baslil _
BasinCode,_
Header Ent.,GW-1 E"t.,~_
State Well Construction Permit
Number:~~N:..:::..Ar-"'--~~~~~~~~_~~~_,C-3
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
MIN-I':
North Carolina Department ofEnvir'onmental,Health &Natural Resourcc=:S
Division ofEnvironmental Management-Groundwatc=:r Section
P.O.aox 27687-R.le;gh,N.C.27611·7587
tIl Identification
Drilling Contractor
Jiller Registration Number
1
1
prjII Jog
Fonnation.Desoription
C<s'-N ~-::'l...A--C:.
lht~OI"S\ol -I!>~TI DM.#-~
'i>L14 "'1U1 CA.......f'J SI vr '-'I L.,l ~
I peQUop Sketch
(Show direction &di:sfanl;e fr¢m.-t II!i3$l two State Road:s.or othc:r mll:p ~fl!:~nce poinl!l.)
County:
fulh
From To
0-'"
:(~-l'
l'-,'
9 '-,'3'
I -L -'Z.:S'
1.:5'-5"1 '
MmriID
PVC
Amount----
Wall Thickness
Sch 40
(Road I COffirt'll.lility ,or Subdivision and Lot No,)
Q Feer Above Land Surface~-N""''''~---Te"Method _
Address
wren Location:(Show sketch ofthe location below)
re.,-estTown,~c,H=,Jo,J c..
"2-<1 ""0 w krJf Fra?sT w.
1 City State=:Zip Code
3.Date Drilled I o~'Z.-94-Usc ofWell Monitoringt"otal Depth :'1 "3 I Cunings Collected -----".:.:.:;N"'o='""--
Docs Well Replace:E;,dsting Well No
6.Static Water l "5'"•ll,\Feet Below Top OfCasing
J;Level
pofCasing
J.ield (gprn):
8.Water Zones;
1.(depth)
,Chlorination:
1.Casing;
Depth (ft)
From To10-S8'
I.G,ou"
I':Denth (ft )
~rOm To
D-51,,'
'E;;c..:'-::.'5""'-1--8,-'':l;reen~
Depth (ft)
,~m TO
11}'--13'
MillWl
P~-nke
(h-IRI\">l?)
~
~,e'
fLA<\ft:>l....l
S~5'\)0:.
~:;..Gravel Pack:
I Depth (ft)
rom To'~':'~
Signa.tl1re ofContrac:tor Or Agent Da.te
SUbmit original to Divi$ion (If EnvironmentalManllsement k (.(Ipy to well QWft(r,
Ido hereby certity thar this well was constructed in accordance with IS NCAC 2C,c:eonstnlction
standards,and that a <:opY ofthis record has been provided to the well owner.
Aqualerra,Inc.DOCUment-WeICLagJ.Page-J
GW-I Revised 2190
I
1
",;
u 01'W1."{/11'"''•Sit.Location Map7-28-94
0 ..eV'tSton '9"""O'H ]"e Keebler Site·•u.=""""""-
__
"""'AN'(4106300 1 I"~2000'!Weigh,North Carolina
Ii,•
IiiI
I
I
I
I
I
I
1'1
"'I
1
1
1
'1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Monitoring Well Installation
Monitoring wells are installed in both unconsolidated and consolidated formations to
provide secure sampling points for discrete intervals within confined or unconfined
aquifers or hydrostratigraphic units.Following drilling activities,typically 2 or 4-inch
diameter PVC,or other material,monitoring well screen and casing is placed in the
boring in accordance with the standards specified in the RCRA Ground Water Monitoring
Technical Enforcement Guidance Document.
Well Construction
Once the boring is complete,a ground water monitoring well is constructed by installing a
casing and screen to the desired depth.The annulus is typically backfilled to
approximately 1 to 2 feet above the well screen with a sand pack selected based on the size
of the formation material.A 1 to 2-foot bentonite seal is emplaced above the sand pack.
The remaining annulus is then grouted to the surface with No.1 Portland cement.The
wellhead is secured with a watertight,lockable well cap and is protected by either a steel
manhole cover (at grade)or steel casing (above grade).Refer to the well construction
schematics for details of well construction.
Well Development
Monitoring wells are typically developed by using decontaminated Teflon bailers or new
disposable bailers as surge blocks,by pumping,or by other acceptable well development
procedures.Well development is performed to remove fines from the sand pack and well
screen to minimize turbidity in samples and to improve the hydraulic connection between
the well screen and the formation.
Surveying
Surveying is performed to determine the relative reference point elevation of the wells.
Elevations are referenced to either the state grid system (mean sea level)or an assumed
elevation at a temporary benchmark established on-site.Elevations are measured to the
nearest 0.01 foot,and are used for creating ground water contour maps.
Standard Procedures 5/94
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Ground Water Sampling
Field Parameters
Prior to ground water sample collection,the water level in each well is measured with a
decontaminated electric water level probe.Water level measurements are used to create
ground water contour maps (either water table or potentiometric)and to calculate well
volumes.The wel1s are purged by removing three to five times the wel1 volume,or until
dry,with decontaminated Teflon bailers,new disposable bailers,or low-flow submersible
pumps to remove stagnant water so that a representative ground water sample can be
obtained.Depending on the site status,temperature,specific conductivity,and pH are
measured and recorded in the field following removal of each volume of water.Samples
are general1y not collected until the field parameters stabilize within approximately 10%of
each other.
Ground Water Sample Collection
Ground water samples are typical1y collected within 1 hour of purging to minimize the loss
of any volatile organic compounds (VQCs)that may be present.Laboratory
decontaminated bottom~valve Teflon bailers,new disposable bailers,or low-flow
submersible pumps may used to withdraw the samples.
All ground water samples are decanted into laboratory provided containers appropriate
for the parameters being analyzed,preserved as required by the analytical technique,
and are labeled with the following information:sampler's name,date of col1ection,
sample number,analysis to be performed,and project number.Samples are stored and
transported to the analytical laboratory in an insulated cooler chilled to approximately
4°C.To ensure sample integrity,all samples are transported in accordance with EPA
chain-of-custody protocols.All samples are typically transported to the laboratory
within 24-hours ofsample collection,if possible.
Standard Procedures 5/94
If you have any questions concerning this report,please feel free
to contact us.
Dear Mr.Taylor:
Enclosed is the report of laboratory analyses for samples received
October 04,1994.
RECEIVED
October 06,1994 Ocr 7./994
An Equal Opportunity Employer
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Footnotes are given at the end of the report.
Kris H.Kommalan
Project Manager
Mr.Tom Taylor
Aquaterra Environmental Consultants
PO Box 37579
4901 Waters Edge Dr.
Raleigh,NC 27627-7579
RE:PACE Project No.641004.509
Client Reference:Keebler
Sincerely,
lJ.y~llcY\-;~"C(L~
Enclosures
9aoo Kintey Avenue.Suite 100
Huntersville.NC 28078
TEl;70H75-0007
FAk 704-075-5051
1"
1
I 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
------------_._-
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS
l,l,l-Trichloroethane
l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,I,2-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethene
1,1-0lchloroethane
1,l-Dlchloroethene
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
200.7
200.7
239.2
249.2
An Equal Opportuntty Employ!;!!'
October 06,1994
PACE Project Number:641004509
NO
NO
0.038
NO
92 0273044
10/04/94
10/04/94
MW-ls
____METHOD DATE ANALYZEDMOL
0.010
0.010
0.005
0.010
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
601
ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
ug/L ,1.0 NO 10/05/94
ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
ug/L 0.5 NO 10/05/94
ug/L 0.5 NO 10/05/94
ug/L 0.5 NO 10/05/94
ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
ug/L 0.5 NO 10/05/94
ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Units
Consultants
9800 Kincey Avenue,Suite 100
Huntersville.NC 28078
TEL:704·875·9092
FAX,704·875-9091
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Chloroform
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Chromium
Copper
Lead W/3030C Digestion
Nickel
1,2-Dlchlorobenzene
l,3-Dichlorobenzene
l,4-0lchlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dlchloropropane
2-ChloroethoxYethane
Aquaterra Environmental
PO Box 37579
4901 Waters Edge Dr.
Raleigh,NC 27627-7579
Bromodichlormethane
Oibromochloromethane
Bromoform
'Bromomethane
cis-l,3-0ichloropropene
Carbon tetrachloride
I'
I
1
1 Attn:Mr.Tom Taylor
1 C1 ient Reference:Keeb1er
PACE Sample Number:
Date Co 11 ected:
I,Date Recei ved:
"Client Sample 10:
Parameter
1 INORGANIC ANALYSIS
1
1
1
1
'I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1"
1 ENVIRONMENTAl..l..A60RATOAIES REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
9800 Kincey Avenue,Suite 100
Huntersville,NC 28078
TEL:704-875·9092
FAX:704·875-9091
601
ug!L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
ug/l 1.0 ND 10/05/94
ug/l 1.0 NO 10/05/94
ug/l 1.0 ND 10/05/94
ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
ug/l 1.0 ND 10/05/94
ug/L 1.0 ND 10/05/94
1Mr.Tom Taylor
Page 2
Client Reference:Keebler
'11 PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
1Date Received:
•Client Sample 10:
Parameter
11 ORGANIC ANALYSIS
PURGEABlE HAlOCARBONS
1,Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Chloroethane
11
Di ch 1oromethane
•trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Tetrachloroethene
11 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
,Chloroethene (Vinyl chloride)
I
I
1
11
1
1
1
11
11
1
Units MOL
October 06,1994
PACE Project Number:641004509
92 0273044
10/04/94
10/04/94
MW-1s
__________METHOD DATE ANALYZED
An Eqr,t~1 Opportuni'ty Employer
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
200.7 10/05/94
200.7 10/05/94
239.2 10/05/94
249.2 10/05/94
601
An Equal Op~ortunity Employer
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
___________METHOD DATE ANALYZED
NO
NO
0.01l
NO
92 0273052
10/04/94
10/04/94
MW-1 i
MOL
0.010
0.010
0.005
0.010
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
October 06,1994
PACE Project Number:641004509
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
9800 Kincey Avenue.Suite 100
Huntersville.NC 28078
TE'-'70.·875-g0n
FAX,704·875-909'
Chloroform
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Chloroethane
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Chromium
Copper
Lead W/3030C Digestion
Ni cke1
Dichloromethane
Client Reference:Keebler
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS
l,l,l-Trichloroethane
l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
l,l,2-Trichloroethane
l,l,2-Trichloroethene
l,l-0ichloroethane
l,l-Dichloroethene
l,2-Dichlorobenzene
l,3-Dichlorobenzene
l,4-Dichlorobenzene
l,2-0ichloroethane
l,2-Dichloropropane
2-Chloroethoxyethane
Bromodichlormethane
Dibromochloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
Carbon tetrachloride
r
1
1..'Mr.Tom TaylorPage3
I PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
1 Date Received:
..,Client Sample 10:
Parameter
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
I
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
____________METHOD DATE ANALYZED
October 06,1994
PACE Project Number:641004509
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
601
An Equal Opportunity Employer
NO
NO
NO
NO
92 0273052
10/04/94
10/04/94
MW-1i
MOL
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
9800 Kinee:y Avenue,Suite 100
Huntersville.NC ,a078
TEL:704·875·9092
FAX:704-975·9091
Client Reference:Keebler
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:.
Client Sample 10:
Parameter
Mr.Tom Taylor
Page 4
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Tetrachloroethene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroethene (Vinyl chloride)
l
I,
J
1
II
I
1
1
"I
J
1
1
1
1
1
'I
1
I
~I
I REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
1Mr.Tom Taylor October 06,1994
Page 5 PACE Project Number:641004509
Client Reference:Keebler
1PACE Sample Number:92 0273060
Date Collected:10/04/94
'I Date Received:10/04/94
Client Sample 10:MW-6s
Parameter Units MOL METHOD DATE ANALYZED
1 INORGANIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
I Chromi um mg/L 0.010 NO 200.7 10/05/94
Copper mg/L 0.010 NO 200.7 10/05/94
Lead W/3030C Digestion mg/L 0.005 0.023 239.2 10/05/94
1 Ni cke1 mg/L 0.010 0.016 249.2 10/05/94
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
1 PURGEABLE HALO CARBONS 601
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L 1.0 1.7 10/05/94
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
'.1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94-
1,1,2-Trichloroethene U9/L 1.0 27 10/05/94
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L 1.0 4.8 10/05/94
I 1,1-Dichloroethene ug/L 1.0 23 10/05/94
1,2-0ichlorobenzene ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
1,3-0ichlorobenzene ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94II1,4-0ichlorobenzene ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
1,2-0ichloroethane ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
1,2-0ichloropropane ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94,2-Chloroethoxyethane ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
Bromodichlormethane ug/L 0.5 NO 10/05/94
Oibromochloromethane ug/L 0.5 NO 10/05/94
1 Bromoform ug/L 0.5 NO 10/05/94
Bromomethane ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
cis-l,3-0ichloropropene ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
1 Carbon tetrachloride ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
Chloroform ug/L 0.5 0.6 10/05/94
1 Oichlorodifluoromethane ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
Chlorobenzene ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
Chloromethane ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
'.Chloroethane ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
Dichloromethane ug/L 1.0 NO 10/05/94
1
9aoo Kincey Avenue,Suite 100 An EClU~'Opportunity Employer
I Huntersville,NC 28078
W-'704·875·9092
FAX:704·875·9091
1
11
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
1Mr.Tom Taylor
Page 6
Client Reference: Keebler
I PACE Sample Number:
Date Co 11 ected:
Date Received:1Client Sample ID:
Parameter Units MDL
October 06,1994
PACE Project Number:641004509
92 0273060
10/04/94
10/04/94
MW-6s___________METHOD DATE ANALYZED
S1300 Kincey Avenue.Suite 100
Huntersville,NC 28078
TEl.:704-875·9092
FAX:704-875·9091
11 ORGANIC ANALYSIS
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS
1 trans~I,3-Dichloropropene
Tetrachloroethene
trans-l,2-0ichloroethene11Chloroethene(Vinyl chloride)
11
1
I
I
11
~I
I 1
11
'I
I
11
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
NO
13
ND
NO
601
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
An EClual Opportunity Employer
1
1 ENVIAONMaNiAL lABORATORIES REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
.Chloroform
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Chloroethane
",Mr.Tom Taylor•Page 7
Client Reference:Keebler
,PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
1Date Received:
,Client Sample ID;
Parameter
October 06,1994
PACE Project Number:641004509
___________METHOD DATE ANALYZED
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
200.7 10/05/94
200.7 10/05/94
239.2 10/05/94
249.2 10/05/94
601
An Equal Opportunity Employer
1.6
ND
ND
4.4
ND
12
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.103
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
NO
92 0273079
10/04/94
10/04/94
MW-6i
MDL
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.010
0.010
0.005
0.010
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Chromium
Copper
Lead W/3030C Digestion
Ni cke1
9800 Kincey Avenue,Suite 100
Hunts(sville.NC 28078
TEL:704-875·9092
FAX:704·875·9091
Dichloromethane
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS
I,I,I-Trichloroethane
I,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
2-Chloroethoxyethane
Bromodichlormethane
Dibromochloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Carbon tetrachloride
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
'.
1
1
I
'.
1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
____________METHOD DATE ANALYZED
October 06,1994
PACE Project NUmber:641004509
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
601
An Equal Opportunity emplaYE~
NO
5.5
ND
NO
92 0273079
10/04/94
10/04/94
MW-6i
MOL
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Units
9800 Kincey Avenue.Suite 100
Huntersville,NC 28078
TEL:704-875·9092
FAX,704·S75·9091
Client Reference:Keebler
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample 10:
Parameter
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Tetrachloroethene
trans-1,2-0ichloroethene
Chloroethene (Vinyl chloride)
Mr.Tom Taylor
Page 8
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
1
I
1
1
1
'.
1
1
I
1
I REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
11.,.Mr.Tom Taylor
••Page 9
Client Reference:Keebler
October 06,1994
PACE Project Number:641004509
____________METHOD DATE ANALYZED
92 0273087
10/04/94
10/04/94
MW-7s
An Eql,llill Opportunity Employe(
1
I
1
1
1
1
'.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample ID:
Parameter
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIOUAL PARAMETERS
Chromium
Copper
Lead W/3030C Digestion
Ni cke1
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS
l,l,l-Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethene
I,I-Dichloroethane
I,l-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
2-Chloroethoxyethane
Bromodichlormethane
Oibromochloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
cis-l,3-0ichloropropene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Oichlorodifluoromethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Chloroethane
Oichloromethane
9800 Kincey Avenl,le,Suite 100
Huntersville.NC 28076
TEL:[phone]
fAX'704-875·9091
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
MDL
0.010
0.010
0.005
0.010
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
ND
ND
0.021
ND
16
ND
ND
ND
2.8
89
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.8
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
1.1
200.7
200.7
239.2
249.2
601
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
__________METHOD DATE ANALYZED
October 06,1994
PACE Project Number:641004509
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
601
An Equal Opportunity Employer
ND
120
ND
ND
92 0273087
10/04/94
10/04/94
MW-7s
MDL
1.0
10.0
1.0
1.0
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
gEOa Kincey Avenl,ll'!.Suite '00
Huntersville.NC 28078
TEIc 704·875-5052
FAX:704-875·9091
Client Reference;Keebler
Mr.Tom Taylor
Page 10
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Tetrachloroethene
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroethene (Vinyl chloride)
DRGANIC ANALYSIS
PACE Sample Number;
Date Collected;
Date Received:
Client Sample ID;
Parameter
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
October 05,1994
PACE Project Number:541004509
___________METHOD DATE ANALYZED
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
200.7
200.7
239.2
249.2
501
An Equal Opportunity Employer
92 0273095
10/04/94
10/04/94
MW-7i
NO
NO
0.019
NO
230
ND
NO
11
9.5
540
NO
NO
NO
5.0
7.4
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
NO
NO
4.8
ND
NO
NO
NO
NO
IS
MDL
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
100
0.010
0.010
0.005
0.010
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
2.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Chromium
Copper
Lead W/3030C Digestion
Ni cke 1
9800 Kinc:ey Avenue,Suite '00
Hl,Inle:niVille,NC 28078
TEL:70H75-9092
fAX:704-875·9091
Mr.Tom Taylor
Page 11
Client Reference:Keebler
PACE Sample Number:
Date Co11 ected:
Date Received:
Client.Sample ID:
Parameter
Oichloromethane
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS
1,1,I-Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethene
I,I-Dichloroethane
I,I-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-0ichlorobenzene
1,4-0ichlorobenzene
1,2-0ichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
2-Chloroethoxyethane
Chloroform
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Chloroethane
Bromodichlormethane
Dibromochloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
cis-I,3-Dichloropropene
Carbon tetrachloride
I
I
1
I
'I
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
and are approved for release.
~METHOD DATE ANALYZED
IO/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
10/05/94
601
October 06,1994
PACE Project Number;641004509
92 0273095
10/04/94
10/04/94
MW-7i
NO
6100
NO
NO
MOL
5.0
100
5.0
5.0
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Units
Client Reference:Keebler
Mr.Tom Taylor
Page 12
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Tetrachloroethene
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroethene (Vinyl chloride)
These data have been reviewed
i2~~~Charles M Cabaniss
Manager,norganic Chemistry
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample 10:
Parameter
1
I
I
I
I
1
1
"I
1
1
1
rgaret S.Harding
Mnager,Organic Chemistry
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
9800 Kincey Avenue.Suite 100
Huntersville.NC Ze078
TEL:704-875·9092
FAX:704-875·9091
An Equal Opportunity Employer
MOL Method Detection Limit
NO Not detected at or above the MOL.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
1
'.
1
I
ill
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
«I
1
1
1
I
Mr.Tom Taylor
Page 13
Client Reference:Keebler
9800 Kincey Avenue.Suite 100
Huntersville.NC 28078
Tn:704·875·9092
FAX,704"875-9091
FOOTNOTES
for pages 1 through 12
October 06,1994
PACE Project Number:641004509
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Lead W/3030C Digestion
Batch:92 30962
Samples:92 0273044,92 0273052,92 0273060,92 0273079,92 0273087
92 0273095
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
l
I
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Reference
Value Recv
0.020 98%
October 06,1994
PACE Project Number:641004509
MOL
0:005
Method
MOL Blank
0:005 NO
Units
mg/L
Units
mg/L
9800 Klnc:ey Avenue,Suite 100
Huntersville,NC 2607S
TEl.:704·875-5052
FAX:704-67,·5051
ENVIRONMi::NTAl LABORATORIES
METHOD BLANK:
Client Reference:Keebler
Parameter
Lead W/3030C Digestion
Parameter
Lead W/3030C Digestion
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
Mr.Tom Taylor
Page 14
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
October 06,1994
PACE Project Number:641004509
QUALITY CONTROL DATA1..Mr.Tom Taylor
•Page 15
Client Reference:Keebler
I lCP QUALITY CONTROL
Batch:92 30921
1..·.Samples:92 0273044,92 0273052,92 0273060,92 0273079,92 0273087
92 0273095
I METHOD BLANK:Method
Parameter Units MDL BlankII--
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Calcium mg/L 0.10 NO
1 Magnesium mg/L 0.10 ND
Molybdenum mg/L 0.020 ND
Potassium mg/L 0.10 ND
Sodium mg/L 0.10 ND
1 ICP QUALITY CONTROL
Ni ckel mg/L 0.010 NO
'.Cadmium mg/L 0.010 ND
Vanadium mg/L 0.010 NO
Lead mg/L 0.10 ND
1 Barium mg/L 0.010 ND
Copper mg/L 0.010 ND
Chromium mg/L 0.010 ND
1 Beryll i urn mg/L 0.010 ND
Zinc mg/L 0.010 NO
Cobalt mg/L 0.010 NO
1 Iron mg/L 0.010 NO
Sil ver mg/L 0.005 NO
1 Manganese mg/L 0.010 NO
Aluminum mg/L 0.010 ND
1 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
Reference
Parameter Units MOL Value Recv--
I INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Calcium mg/L 0.10 5.0 102%
1 Magnesium mg/L 0.10 5.0 98%
Molybdenum mg/L 0.020 0.500 94%
Potassium mg/L 0.10 5.0 86%
1
ssoo Kincey Avenue,Suits 100 An Equal Opportunity Employer
I Huntersville,NC 28078
TEL:704-875·9092
FAX,704·875-90S1
saoo Klncey Avenue.Suite 100 An EClual Opportunity Employer
HuntE:(sville,file :lS078
TEl:704-875·9092
FAX;70H75·9091
ICP QUALITY CONTROL
Batch:92 30921
Samples:92 0273044,92 0273052,92 0273060,92 0273079,92 0273087
92 0273095
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
Reference
Parameter Units MDL Value Recv--
ICP QUALITY CONTROL
Sodium mgjL 0.10 5.0 90%
Ni cke1 mgjL 0.010 0.500 96%
Cadmium mgjL 0.010 0.500 95%
Vanadium mgjL 0.010 0.500 98%
Lead mgjL 0.10 0.50 96%
Barium mgjL 0.010 0.500 102%
Copper mgjL 0.010 0.500 100%
Chromium mgjL 0.010 0.500 97%
Beryllium mgjL 0.010 0.500 91%
Zinc mgjL 0.010 0.500 96%
Cobalt mgjL 0.010 0.500 97%
Iron mgjL 0.010 0.500 98%
Silver mgjL 0.005 0.050 90%
Manganese mgjL 0.010 0.500 97%
Aluminum mgjL 0.010 0.500 101%
October 06,I994
PACE Project Number:641004509
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Client Reference:Keebler
Mr.Tom Taylor
Page 16
1
1
1
1
'11
1
1
1
1
'.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
eeoo Kincey Avenue,Suite 100 An EQual Opportunity Emplover
Huntersville,NC 28078
TEl.:10.-815·9092
FAK 704·815-9091
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS
Batch:92 30976
Samples:92 0273044,92 0273052,92 0273060,92 0273079,·92 0273087
92·0273095
METHOD BLANK:
Method
Parameter Units MOL Bl ank
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS (1)
I,I,I-Trichloroethane U9/L 1.0 NO
I,I,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 1.0 NO
I,I,2-Trichloroethane ug/L 1.0 NO
l,l,2-Trichloroethene ug/L 1.0 NO
I,I-Dichloroethane ug/L 1.0 NO
I,I-Oichloroethene ug/L 1.0 NO
I,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 1.0 NO
I,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 1.0 NO
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 1.0 NO
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L 1.0 NO
I,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 1.0 NO
2-Chloroethoxyethane ug/L J.O NO
Bromodichlormethane ug/L 0.5 NO
Dibromochloromethane ug/L 0.5 NO
Bromoform ug/L 0.5 NO
Bromomethane ug/L 1.0 NO
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 1.0 NO
Carbon tetrachloride ug/L 1.0 NO
Chloroform ug/L 0.5 NO
Oichlorodifluoromethane ug/L 1.0 NO
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L 1.0 NO
Chlorobenzene ug/L 1.0 NO
Chloromethane ug/L 1.0 NO
Chloroethane ug/L 1.0 NO
Dichloromethane ug/L 1.0 0trans-I,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 1.0
Tetrachloroethene ug/L 1.0 NO
trans-I,2-0ichloroethene ug/L 1.0 NO
Chloroethene (Vinyl chloride)ug/L 1.0 NO
October 06,1994
PACE Project Number:641004509
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Client Reference:Keebler
Mr.Tom Taylor
Page 17
1
I
1
I
1
I
1
1
1
'.
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
Reference
Parameter Units MOL Value Recv
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L r:o 20 85%
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 1.0 20 110%
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L 1.0 20 95%
1,1,2-Trichloroethene ug/L 1.0 20 85%
1,1-0ichloroethane ug/L 1.0 20 95%
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/L 1.0 20 80%
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 1.0 20 100%
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 1.0 20 95%
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 1.0 20 95%
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L 1.0 20 95%
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 1.0 20 90%
2-Chloroethoxyethane ug/L 1.0 20 75%
Bromodichlormethane ug/L 0.5 20 95%
Dibromochloromethane ug/L 0.5 20 100%
Bromoform ug/L 0.5 20 90%
Bromomethane ug/L 1.0 20 85%
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 1.0 20 100%
Carbon tetrachloride ug/L 1.0 20 95%
Chloroform ug/L 0.5 20 95%
Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/L 1.0 20 100%
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L 1.0 20 95%
Chlorobenzene ug/L 1.0 20 90%
Chloromethane ug/L 1.0 20 95%
Chloroethane ug/L 1.0 20 95%
Dichloromethane ug/L 1.0 20 90%
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 1.0 20 95%
Tetrachloroethene ug/L 1.0 20 95%
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 1.0 20 85%
Chloroethene (Vinyl chloride)ug/L 1.0 20 100%
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS
Batch;92 30976
Samples:92 0273044,92 0273052,92 0273060,92 0273079,92 0273087
92 0273095
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
An Equal O~portl,ll'ljty Employer
October 06,1994
PACE Project Number:641004509
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
gaoo Kincey Avenue.Suit!;!100
Hvntersville,NC :za07a
TEL:104-875·9092
rAK 10H15·9091
Mr.Tom Taylor
Page 18
Client Reference;Keebler
1
1
1
1
'.
'I
I
1
1
~I
'.
'I
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
MDL Method Detection Limit
ND Not detected at or ,above the MDL.
(1)Dichloromethane is a possible lab contaminant.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
1
1
I
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Mr.Tom Taylor
Page 1g
Client Reference:Keebler
9600 Kincey Avenue,Suite 100
HunW$vilie.NC 28078
TEL:704·875-9092
FAX,704-S75-9091
FOOTNOTES
for pages 14 through 18
October 06,1994
PACE Project Number:641004509
An EQual Opportunity Employer
1870N?
~O""'Olfl~~
CHAIN·Of-CUSTODY RECORD
ANALYTI CAL REaUEST
.........................
A GREAT LAKES CHEMrCAL COHt-"UHAI lVi'll ....u m"'AI'll T
"':-.;_.-Ii .....-Ii .......
~aC1UaTerra
---~.__.--~._...~~
;;n.:)09:5
uj3B./
d,'72JJ&;.O
c((?-rf!-.ti
di30').<1
;J1...3t6.:J.
TURNAROUND.0 NORMAl 0 5.1)AY ['j"6TH"ISPEO"1';J Lj !;.L
r/
rl"~°~\!I i'YrN
N,
N,a
31 1-1 1v'
31 1-11,/lv
.3
.3-
NUMBER III COt-lTAI NERS
wmE~~:i)~s:tmj
W'jl,(J ,,,,011£-I.{-'V~iJ f-r
SAkliLEO o.y Ii'RlNlj:
fROJ!'CT NMIE.Y bI "'PORT TO•.........-:1 J__-/.0-,-,e,-,p,-..~PC 10 rv---,~o '![(j (
AOO",OS 51 t Elf ~<;PrA ,.!kk),.u)h I\!(."",noNr:;;;'_1 f~~•"o'~,",~"n","m_
KlBNUM'"y \07bo I .I I PHONE'ff1q)f..f1.'f 9.f
o rS"I.zXI.)(I V 1-1--TiY-ri
*~ftHVL1
,:j;~~;I ~~.~1J I
IJ',QJ \;1 1 III 1 I II
\l·~vII ILl 1 I 1I
AoomONAl COMMl:NTS:
'-
TIME A1RB11J.-#
1 i":I~,',Ij~I-_
/'
,'"IOU "~"""'fo'.T~_~...~'rr-nH r...~'-PI ~ll(_IABrnA.TCY-tr'Cr¥7'f I (lLNARY-S-AMPl FR'5 COPY